Hey guys. Let's try this. Take the data from 2000 and change the following. Take Keystone West volumes to 850,000/d rateably, then add the new gen numbers posted below. You will need to add this demand to the EOC S ML demand numbers (Is Salmayuca included in this number?). We should use the 2000 waha west volumes for now. You should end up with reduced ehrenberg volumes for the reduction in Keystone west volumes and the addition of New Gen demand. Run the storage balance at 2000 Socal in this scenario. We will then plug forward with waha west volumes to balance Socal in 2001. Also, add columns to adjust (90%, 60%, 50%, etc) the burns for new gen in SW. We should then look to adjusting socal demand down for the high hydro/increased NW imports to CA scenario that could happen. Use the SP-15 2000 gen numbers and then back out the avg of 1999 and 2000 power imports. I would like to avoid averaging 1999 and 2000 socal gas demand. Use a 10,000 heat rate to reduce gas demand. Have Jay adjust EOC demand for normal weather. We may have to refer to the load sensitivity data from west power to reduce the SW electric loads and then back out of gen numbers using a 10,000 heat rate. We will then be exposed to EPNG and the OPS increasing Keystone west volumes between now and next summer - run the 2001 with this possibility as well. Take Key West to 1.1 bcf. Let me know where my errors in approach may be. This should give us a picture of the Socal deliverability for 2001. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: APR-OCT Analysis
Susan, Attached are redlined copies of the CSA Amendments. We made a change to the Monthly Contract Quantity to exclude Force Majeure events and Section 2.4 Shaft energy interruptions. Please review and call me with any questions. x-33512. Since we have circulated the prior amendment, I think it would avoid the most confusing by giving these amendments a new execution date. I also added a section which specifices that these versions replace the amendments dated June 18, 1999. The NBV letter values will also be redone. The numbers will have to be changed. The investors have asked that instead of a Contract Year Schedule, a quarterly schedule be included. I don't have the numbers from Mark yet, but will forward those changes as soons as I get them. Mark indicated that he had discussed these changes with both you and David.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: CSA Amendments
PW, HPL's spot and base purchases by zone for April 2000 are reported in the attached file. Let me know if you have any questions. D
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: April 2000 spot supply
Robbie: I was in your class that you taught for the Princeton Review at Enron just recently. What I'm looking for is a private Math tutor. I wasn't sure if I had to go through the Princeton Review or if I could talk directly to you. I liked the way you taught the class and wanted to see if you taught one on one sessions. If you could let me know, I would appreciate it. Thanks!
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Princeton Classes