Question: Sentence A: It was originally intended as a church for Louis XV, but is now a secular mausoleum of some of the nation's greatest heroes.

Sentence B: Originally intended as a church for Louis XV, it has since been transformed into a premier art gallery.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: i didn't know anything about this that's fantastic
I didn't know about this great news.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
History teaches few practical lessons, but here it may have a small one to Larry Cockell, call your agent.

Here is a hypothesis:
History is full of lessons to be learned.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: In another moment, the door opened and Dorcas appeared.

Sentence 2: Dorcas was standing by the door at that moment.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Penalties on delinquent taxes are therefore a nonexchange revenue.

Does it follow that "Penalties are a nonexchange revenue."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Keynes therefore understood perfectly well that a low interest-rate policy requires an accommodating central bank.", can we conclude that "Central banks have to accommodate a low interest-rate policy."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes