A child in shorts in water would most likely be in a pool.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A kid in red shorts playing in water."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The kid in shorts is playing in the pool." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes
A man can examine the chain on a bike but it doesn't mean it was not working correctly.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "Two men cyclists examining the chain on a bike at night."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The bike chain was not working correctly." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
Must be a man or two men. Cannot sit contemplatively and shout in a crowd.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "A man wearing a helmet has his hand up in the air and is shouting in a similar way the crowd behind his doing." is it true that "Two men sit contemplatively."?
no
A girl runs through sprinklers that shoot water out of the ground does not necessary that she is wearing a swimsuit.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A girl runs through sprinklers that shoot water out of the ground."
Hypothesis: "She is wearing a swimsuit."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell
Men cannot be both watching a man in a cherry picker and watching television.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "Three men are watching the man in the cherry picker." is it true that "Three men are watching the man pick cherries on television."?
no
They are talking about how the chief is wearing a headdress.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "An indian chief in traditional headdress." that "The chef is wearing a headdress."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
yes