TASK DEFINITION: Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.
PROBLEM: CONTEXT: It is not explained, but we can theorize. We don't know when he rented those books. He might have done so before buying his own (to ensure he indeed should buy them), or because the books weren't easy (or cheap) to purchase. Also remember that instead of renting books on a subject he is well versed in, he probably became well versed on the subject thanks to renting those books. Finally, despite those books in his apartment, IIRC we are never told what those books are about. They might have had nothing to do with the seven deadly sins (John Doe wanted to avoid having incriminating evidence on his home, perhaps?), and thus all of his knowledge came from renting the books in the library. The books in his house might have been educational on a ton of other subjects or philosophies. Also keep in mind, the Internet still wasn't a thing back then. And books such as the ones mentioned (on bondage, homicide, or by Italian Dominican friars) might have not been easily found in your regular old book store. Finally, you can also claim that he rented them to make the plot move along, as this was their main lead. <sep> Q: Why did John Doe need to check out books at a public library? A: It is not explained, but we can theorize Q: What is your theory? A: Internet still wasn't a thing back then Q: John Doe knew a lot about the Seven Deadly Sins already, didn't he? A: IIRC we are never told what those books are about. They might have had nothing to do with the seven deadly sins <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What else can you tell me about the movie?

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: CONTEXT: There's something else to add to the other answers : Vision can't exist without the mind stone. So to bring him back, you'll need to bring him back with the mind stone on his head, which can't be done if the mind stone is on the gauntlet (as far as we know, even having the 6 stones can't make you create a new stone). So even if resurecting someone was possible, Vision is one of the only creatures in the universe that actually could never be brought back by the stones. <sep> Q: Thanos killed Vision in Infinity War to get the Mind Stone. During end game, hulk does "the snap" does this mean that the chracter was brought back? A: Vision can't exist without the mind stone. So to bring him back, you'll need to bring him back with the mind stone on his head Q: How is this possible? A: as far as we know, even having the 6 stones can't make you create a new stone Q: So Vision wont be able to be brought back to life? A: Vision is one of the only creatures in the universe that actually could never be brought back by the stones <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else you can tell me?

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: CONTEXT: When Loki tries to take control of Stark he actually hits the ARC reactor and not the flesh over his heart. Your graphic explains it best with the "Tink, Tink" sound showing that Loki is actually hitting the metal of the reactor. In the Avengers director commentary, Joss Whedon states it fails to work because the ARC reactor prevents the staff from reaching Tony's heart. <sep> Q: Can Loki finally control Tony Stark's mind? A: When Loki tries to take control of Stark he actually hits the ARC reactor and not the flesh over his heart Q: Does the Arc help Tony Stark in any ways? A: In the Avengers director commentary, Joss Whedon states it fails to work because the ARC reactor prevents the staff from reaching Tony's heart <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What does Loki use to change other people's mind?

SOLUTION:
No