In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: Many milennial women like myself don't feel called to marry the immature losers that remain single.
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: Good comments, Monica.

I imagine you'll agree that the discussion about who might be the first gay saint presupposes a fairly modern paradigm about sexual orientation. The norm throughout most of history has been for a somewhat flexible line. It's doubtful that Paul -- or most of the sacred authors, for that matter -- even thought in terms of 'straightness' or 'gayness,' but rather in terms of what they perceived as moral or immoral actions.

Regarding RC bishops, it seems that these days intellectual curiosity is not high on the list of qualifications. There are plenty of intellectually curious priests (well, some anyway), but they tend to get weeded out well before they rise to the level of the episcopacy, sad to say.
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: The RG has a very forgiving stance toward NK now that Trump has taken them on. Would that the RG applied the same sensitivity to the internal interests of Russia and China and other countries all of whom have their internal self interests. The RG must be appalled that Obama bombed Libya and armed the killer rebels in Syria - or not. Rationality and consistency seem in short supply on the left.
[EX A]:
Non-insult