This is the content of an email: "Kirkpatrick, Joe" <joe.kirkpatrick@nrgenergy.com> writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: The results of the recent capacity auctions would seem to highlight that New York and NYC in particular may not be the "tight markets" that require the numerous layers of mitigation presently in place. It is difficult to determine the "spare" capacity in NYC, Long Island or the Rest of State market due the fact that New York unlike other ISOs does not publish what the total capacity supply is for each month or season. The "curtailable load" portion of the equation has had a significant impact on capacity requirements but as yet it is unknown what the total impact is. This new capacity supply is effectively increasing the supply of available capacity. Quoting generation capabilities and load requirements excludes curtailable load and other demand response mechanisms, the exclusion of these factors grossly misrepresents supply conditions. Total capacity and spare capacity after the completion of all the capacity auctions is information essential to the economics for developers who are developing or constructing generation in NYC and other areas in NY. There is only a set amount of capacity required in New York and New York City, adjustments in price do not increase demand as they would in other commodities. Assumptions that supplies are tight and developers can rely on capacity payments to contribute to fixed cost recovery are severely overstated. There is a significant surplus of capacity in NYC alone, at a minimum there is well over 800 MW of spare capacity that we can account for as a result of the recent auctions. How much more capacity is out there? Market participants require this information to assess the economics to develop and build new generation facilities. If capacity payments are being included in project economics then this will have a significant impact on the viability of projects if those capacity payments are not there. This information needs to be published. Joe

Subject: Capacity Totals

This is the content of an email: We should probably start thinking about an agenda for this meeting if only so that we can determine appropriate attendees and get it on their calendars. Do you have anything in particular in mind? Were you thinking legal/regulatory/operations/business/marketing? Hope you're having a fun weekend!

Subject: October 2nd London Meeting

This is the content of an email: I am definitely interested in the parking space at the Met. Please let me know if it is still possible for me to acquire a space. Thanks,

Subject: Parking

This is the content of an email: Mike, The change in the curves only shows a .60 increase today. The curves were down anywhere from .60 to 1.65 previous which was supposed to be up .25. Cin was up @ .15 today. That would mean that ENT should be up at least the amount it was down the previous day plus any increase marked today. Can you look into this for me. This is causing a $2MM hit in the books down here. Thanks.
Subject: CURVES