Question: Sentence A: my husband's been in Dallas during an ice storm he said that he pulled up to a stop at a stop sign and completely stopped just slid to the side of the curb that they're that bad Lubbock

Sentence B: My husband's car slid on ice during a storm in Dallas, it was that bad.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: E-mail Slate readers will get the survey by e-mail.
Slate subscribers who receive the magazine electronically and are in good standing can check their e-mails for the poll.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Techniques and conventions that will come to seem eternal and inevitable will actually be invented in the coming months.

Here is a hypothesis:
All the techniques and conventions needed are already there.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: yeah well unless they finally do take care of it themselves but you know you kind of have to wonder whether it's going to be any better with uh you know depending on whether it Shiite Muslim or uh or the Kurds in power but uh you know

Sentence 2: Who would be best in power?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Another knew all about dredging canals and the last one was an electronics engineer--a field in which Dave was far more competent.

Does it follow that "Dave was far more competent as an electronics engineer than anything else."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "To recognize and reinforce results-oriented management, VA instituted in 1992 a formal recognition program for quality achievement.", can we conclude that "A formal recognition program was instituted in 1992 by VA."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes