The girls would need to be looking at the jewelry to be admiring the jewelry.
The question and answer are below.
If "Two girls admiring jewelry worn by someone on their hands." does that mean that "The girls are looking at the jewelry."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes
The presence of a superior does not imply the soldiers are getting yelled at.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "Four soldiers with bayonets are standing in front of their superior." that "A group of soldiers getting yelled at."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell
One cannot punch his defensive opponent while he sits and listens to his coach.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Can we conclude from "One boxer attempts to punch his defensive opponent with a fierce expression on his face." that "One black boxer sits and listens to his coach."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no
A woman working on an ice sculpture would have to be sculpting.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A woman is working on an ice sculpture."
Hypothesis: "A woman is sculpting something out of ice."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
yes
The tools used for drawing are not the tools used for painting. People are humans and flowers are plants.
The question and answer are below.
If "A woman is drawing a caricature of two people." does that mean that "A woman is painting flowers."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
One cannot drive a pickup truck and a ATV at the same time.
The question and answer are below.
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A person drives an atv through mud."
Hypothesis: "A person is driving a pickup truck."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no