In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: I was so excited to eat at Mi Mero Mole until I found out that the owner, Nick Zukin, was racist and so dismissive of Black Lives Matter.

I'm grateful that this very real issue with Saffron has brought much more about Portland businesses into the light and caused folks to dig deeper into who they support.

Smart business owners should do the right thing and use this opportunity to sympathize with the community (who is rightfully outraged) with the result of likely earning that community's support and winning them over to their business (much like Ristretto Roasters did) rather than PUBLICLY expressing support and shooting themselves in the proverbial foot. It doesn't look like Nick Zukin is that kind of business owner. I suppose some people just like to commit business-suicide.

It's amazing how arrogant business owners like Sally and Nick are to think that Portland has enough racists or racist-sympathizers to keep their restaurants afloat.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: According to third wave feminists like this, it's just not realistic to ask young women to not get blindingly drunk and to moderate their sex lives.

They are from a different planet indeed.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: If you fear for your life or the life of others, you can defend yourself. Cops do it all the time when charged with a car. Couldn't they just "walk away?" I guess you missed the terrorist running down innocent citizens overseas? Who knew they could just "walk away" and live. You live in a fantasy land.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit