In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: I am a gay man, chaste & celibate, with "tendencies" rather than just an orientation or supposed "disorder", and a former priest. The dearth of celibate integrated fellow priests was largely why I left active ministry. My experience is that gay priests tend to be more sexually active than straight priests, although both (forgive the binary constructs) are at least periodically active and to a staggering extent. Solid accounts by rare seminary or chancery personnel underline this reality. Yes, concupiscence is a function of humanity, so let's start such conversations by being compassionate and, where required, forgiving. But we must also acknowledge that the sideways living of enough priests, and the bishops who manage them and who themselves live less than integrated lives, give cover to those in their ranks who engage in criminal, and not merely immoral, behavior. You're only as sick as your secrets; an elite hierarchy calling out this phenomenon as a disorder is more than ironic.

Answer: Identity-attack

Question: Comment: Upon what evidence do you base your opinion that her response was "phony?" Or that it was "outrage?" The outrage that YOU are expressing shows an appalling lack of sensitivity on your part. Why defend rudeness?

Answer: Non-identity-attack

Question: Comment: Last year at Pride, when Black Lives Matters accused the entire LGBT community of Toronto of being nothing but oppressor class racists, did the Globe, CBC or Star stand up in defence of the gay community who have traditionally been open and accepting of all people. Did any politician ( Wynne, Trudeau, Wong Tam, Tory) speak against the sweeping slander of BLM? No of course not. They all tacitly agreed with BLM by refusing to refute the allegations. In white man's media , white man is always guilty. Appropriations just one more sin we carry in our souls.

Answer:
Identity-attack