In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: It is sufficient to note, however, that Stevenson was content to rely on a mix of his own admitted bloodthirstiness and good old-fashioned prejudice for his conclusion. Choices: 1. Stevenson relied on his thirst for blood and prejudice. 2. Stevenson was just and relied on the truth. 3. Stevenson will do anything to get ahead.

Answer: 2

Question: Statement: Will the snazzy partnership produce nothing more than a TV newsmagazine with Tina as the talent, as Variety has suggested? Choices: 1. Variety implied that the partnership will produce no more than a magazine with Tina as the talent. 2. Tina will be the talent because she is the most qualified. 3. Variety has no idea what the snazzy partnership will produce.

Answer: 3

Question: Statement: Additionally, Las Vegas had been made a part of Nevada's new Clark County in 1909, a year when the legislature also outlawed gambling. Choices: 1. Las Vegas was not considered part of Clark County until 1969. 2. Before 1909, Las Vegas was considered its own county. 3. Las Vegas became part of the new Clark County in the same year gambling was outlawed.

Answer:
1