Q: Steve, I wanted to send this email in reference to Min Zhen with regards to the fact that he has not been included as one of the employees that will be a part of the new company. I wanted to make you aware of the fact the West and Canada power risk management groups consider Min to be a vital and very important part of the IT support that we receive. His knowledge and understanding of several very important excel macros that we use daily is critical to the success of our groups. It must be noted that on several occasions when other people were asked for help in areas that Min supports, the response was slow as people tried to understand what the problem was and how to fix it. I feel that is very important and necessary that Min be a part of the staff for the new company to ensure that all the risk groups continue to receive the exceptional support that we have come to expect from him. John
Propose a subject line
A: Min Zheng
IN: There is a sale to CES for a volume of 34,248 dts, deal 149430. It has your name on it. My conterpart at CES does not recognize it. According to Unify the downstream k# is 94946. If you did this deal, do you remember who you did the deal with? Thanks.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Jan CES deal
IN: This is an email
Hello, following up our PGE Budget presentation I am forwarding you the following information. Jessica - the 2002 Capital Slide has been revised to be consistent with the NNG disclosure schedule. The decommissioning forecast is up by $1.6 MM, however since this is funded by the decommissioning trust it should not be an issue. Tracy - Do you have a time and agenda set for the Nov. 1 dry run of the budget presentation? I may be sitting in for Piro so please keep me posted as to what the plan is. Rod - you asked for some detail on our IT capital expenditures. The file IT_Teresa includes the requested detail. Note that in our UE-115 ratecase we were authorized to expend up to $96.8 MM for the 2000-2002 budget years. This is a balancing account, such that if we don't expend the money we have to refund it to customers. As an fyi - I've pasted in below the language from our UE-115 Stipulation on IT costs. Q. What is the basis for the stipulation relating to issue S-45, CIS / IT Disallowance? A. After a Staff review of new IT systems and their associated capital costs, Staff has determined PGE's capital costs for new IT systems to be prudent. As a result, the Parties agreed to full recovery of PGE's IT investments, subject to a Staff audit. PGE will place into base rates 100% of the 2002 revenue requirement related to the 2000, 2001, and 2002 capital additions for the CIS/IT capital items listed below. The 2002 revenue requirement included in base rates will be trued-up to the actual revenue requirement for the CIS/IT capital costs. OPUC Staff will audit PGE's actual capital expenditures for the CIS/IT capital items listed below. 1. Customer information system. 2. Enterprise resources planning (ERP) system. 3. Network meter reading (NMR) backbone and data store (excluding the meters). 4. Miscellaneous capitalized information technology costs. Some of the forecasted 2000-2002 capital additions may be delayed until 2003. Delayed costs can also be recovered, subject to the same Staff audit procedures and standards. Only those costs that are reasonable and prudent will be authorized for inclusion in the "actual" revenue requirement calculation. Accordingly, customers will receive a refund for any costs PGE does not expend or costs the OPUC finds imprudent.

What is the subject?

OUT: PGE 2002 Capital Costs and IT Detail
QUESTION: Over the past few months, Enron Global Finance has been evaluating various opportunities where Enron and Smith Graham & Company may be able to work together. Unfortunately, the process was slowed when our primary contact at Smith Graham, Gabriel Hayes, left the firm earlier this year. We have since reestablished discussions and the Global Finance Group is preparing a proposal that a portion (about $30 million) of the Enron Cash Balance Plan portfolio be dedicated to an emerging managers portfolio. One-third of this money ($10 million) would be invested in bonds, which could be placed with Smith Graham, as the fixed-income manager . (Total Plan assets are about $235 million.) The proposal will be submitted to the Plan Administrative Committee at its quarterly meeting on May 3rd. The proposal should be well received as the Committiee has previously requested that we optimize our existing allocation to minority money managers. Gerald Smith has been advised that Enron is looking at ways to allocate money to the firm, and that a decision should be reached sometime in May. We have not communicated the specific details of our intentions as of yet pending the outcome of the May 3rd meeting. I am available for further discussion at your convenience. Regards,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Gerald Smith
Jane: Susan is trying to revise the Services Agreement once again and the "governing law" issue was raised. I do not have any memoranda addressing which choice of law would be binding on Enron Japan Corp. However, I note that the draft ISDA marked by our Japanese counsel for use by Enron Japan Corp. and IBJ elects New York law (AA email to me dated 9/21/00). Are either Texas or New York law preferable for the Services Agreement? Thanks for your assistance. Regards.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Representative Agreement between Enron Japan Corp. and Enron North America Corp. (the "Services Agreement")
Global counterparty is trying to locate online corporate search companies that can check company names in Europe and Canada. In the U.S. we can access this information via Westmate in Westlaw. Are either of you aware of any online search company, or can you direct me to someone who may be aware of an online search company, for Canada and Europe? If there are no online search companies available, is there a reasonably priced corporate search company that can verify this information for us? I appreciate your help.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Assistance to Global Counterparty