Here is an email: I was wondering if the Bammel lease to AEP contains any operating parameters to protect the integrity of the facility. The question arises from the fact that Bammel had about 24 BCF of remaining capacity when Enron turned the facility over to AEP. We believe their plan is to max inject in June which would reduce the remaining capacity to around 12 BCF. It could become a challenge to keep injections under the remaining 12 BCF level during the reaming 4-5 months of the injection cycle. Enron always operated the facility with the understanding that a Gas In Place volume greater than 117.5 BCF could create a high enough pressure to jeopardize the safety of the wellhead casings and some of the abandoned wells. We would not want the Texas RRC to question the safety of the Bammel facility. From the other end of the perspective if the Gas In Place is taken below 65 BCF their is a high probability of watering out the outer wells and the facility itself.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Bammel Lease Question
Q: John, Attached is a spreadsheet that outlines the transactions with the Power Pool today, specifically the $6.95 M that will be withheld as a security deposit for Enron Canada Power Corp. If you have any questions or concerns, please give me a call. <<Enron Security Jan 29 2002.xls>>
Propose a subject line
A: Power Pool
IN: I had sent out an incorrect revision of the agenda for today's UAF meeting. Attached is a copy of the correct agenda with last months meeting notes. This agenda also includes the dates for year 2002 UAF meetings. Kenneth

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Resend of Southeast UAF agenda
IN: This is an email
We are 25 mws long HE 7-22 at palo verde in the real-time position manager. I printed a forward obligation report for the 20th and that report does not reflect this length. After checking every deal at PV for the 20th against the forward obligation report it appears that our deals have been entered correctly. I discussed this with Holden and he agrees there is no reason we should be long at PV for that day. Therefore, the correct position at PV for the 20th is flat. The length is false. If you are aware of any deals that may have caused the real-time position manager to reflect this length, please let me know. Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: Length at PV heavy for the 20th
QUESTION: Jay and Matt, We should get together and build a gas consumption model for the new generation in the west. We should identify the delivery point and then continue to monitor their status. This will provide us with more information behind our Socal/Rockies spread. Thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: new build
IN: Ms. Buchanan: Attached for your consideration is a draft of a Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement between Enron North America Corp. and TrizecHahn. Upon your review, please give me a call to discuss any issues or questions you may have regarding this matter. Regards,

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
Master Draft