IN: This is an email
Phyllis, Since you're Ms. Aggregation now -- thought you'd want to see this. This bill passed out of the Legislature and has gone to the Governor to sign. Call with questions!

What is the subject?

OUT: Municipal Aggregation Bill Passes
QUESTION: Be advised that there will be a meeting on Thursday 11:00 am August 23 at the NNG Turbine station, south of Kermit Tx. to complete and submit annual certification reports which are required by the following Title V permitted facilities: Seminole Brownfield Plainview Spraberry Irion Co. No. 1 Reagan Co. 2 Eldorado Wt-2 Walton Keystone Kermit Turbine Should a team decide not to attend this meeting, be advised that the required submittal date for the annual certifications for the state of Texas is September 8, 2001. It will be your teams responsibility to ensure that the certifications are submitted prior to the 9/8/01 deadline should you decide not to attend the August 23 meeting.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Annual Certifications Reports Required by Title V
As you know, the Commission last week issued several important notices and papers regarding various policy initiatives that the Commission plans to address over the next few months. These issues are extremely important to Enron and we have been urging FERC to address and resolve (most) of these issues for many years. There is now a Commission in charge that looks like it is ready to act, and we need to be ready to respond. In an effort to coordinate our efforts, we have developed coverage teams to respond to these FERC initiatives. The Washington advocacy group will also work closely with all of these teams. If someone is interested in a particular issue and was not included on that team, please feel free to call the Project Lead to have your name added to the team. All assistance is welcome. As you will see on the attached chart, many of the deadlines for responding to these initiatives are within the next few weeks, so the teams need to mobilize and establish a game plan for our responses very quickly. On the attached chart, we have listed in the left column each of the FERC initiatives that will be starting or are currently underway. A "Project Lead" has been named for each initiative. The Project Lead will be responsible for developing and initiating a game plan for how Enron will respond in the proceeding. The Team Lead will be contacting each of you within the next couple of days to set up processes and procedures for moving forward. The team will be responsible for the initial determination of what issues should be addressed, what is the best way for Enron to respond to them, and producing draft comments. Once draft comments are prepared, the comments will be circulated to a much wider group of Government Affairs and commercial people to ensure that the team has captured all of Enron's important issues. There is a column of "Inside Counsel" and "Outside Services." In some areas, we plan to use outside counsel or consultants and in others we do not. Where we do not list outside counsel, we will rely on our inside counsel to draft the comments (with significant input from the team members). Please remember, however, that even if outside services are listed, the RCR process must still be followed. If applicable, Project Leads should submit the necessary RCR request as soon as possible. The following is a brief description of each proceeding and the Project Lead named for each proceeding: RTO Meetings and Comments to NOPR: Sarah Novosel and Christi Nicolay will be the Project Leads in this proceeding. The RTO meetings will be held in Washington from October 15-19, and we hope to have an executive from Enron make a presentation on one of the panels. Comments will be submitted to FERC regarding the appropriate market design for RTOs. This team will also be responsible for these comments. Standards of Conduct NOPR: Lisa Yoho will be the Project Lead. Comments are due in approximately 45 days. Several issues are raised in this proceeding, including a proposal to apply the standards of conduct to a utility's marketing affiliate buying and selling power to serve native load. This is a significant action for FERC and we will strongly encourage the Commission to adopt this bold proposal. ICAP Inquiry: Christi Nicolay will be the Project Lead. Chairman Wood has indicated that he is not very familiar with capacity and reserve requirements, whether they are needed, and what impact such requirements have on the market. Enron has been a strong opponent of ICAP for many years, and we plan to show FERC that ICAP requirements are not needed. We will submit expert testimony on this issue. California Audit and Westwide Price Cap Mitigation: Alan Comnes will be the Project Lead. Commissioner Brownell is leading a FERC audit of the California ISO. Although we do not have details of what the audit is intended to cover or how expansive it will be, we need to carefully monitor this proceeding and have input into the audit process where possible. Furthermore, a request for rehearing is pending before the Commission regarding the current price cap mitigation measures. The Commission implemented these caps in an effort to limit price spikes in California. California's summer peaking season is over, but the Pacific Northwest's winter peaking season will be starting soon, and the mitigation measures currently in effect could discourage power sellers from selling power to the Northwest, where it will be needed this winter. This team will be responsible for both of these proceedings. Transmission Constraint and Energy Infrastructure Issues: Steve Walton is the Project Lead. FERC staff is studying two significant transmission constraints - California's Path 15 and the Central East Interface in New York -- and plans to have the study completed later this year. The Commission plans to forward the study to DOE. The Commission stated that this is a high priority for it. In a relating proceeding, the Commission has stated that it will hold four open meetings in different regions of the country to identify energy infrastructure issues. The team will also oversee the progress in these proceedings.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Teams for Upcoming FERC Proceedings
Thank you is nice. But cash is even better. Happy Holidays from SBC! We wanted to do more than just say thanks to our customers who view
Answer: Thank you is nice. But cash is even better.
Here is an email: Scott, would you be available in the next couple of weeks to meet with me and some of the HR reps regarding follow-up for employees who leave the company? I would like us to be proactive in those situations. Let me know your availability. Thanks. Michelle x36401.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Follow-Up
QUESTION: Vince, I was just thinking about the subject project that you were trying to get off the ground (even though no commercial support existed!) that I worked on initially. I know you were trying to get this done before I arrived and then followed my effort with at least one other person. I think the reason we could not complete a comprehensive project was we did not have the mandate from the CEO office to do it so that relevant commercial and functional entities can provide the required information. Perhaps the reason there were no major thrust from the management was that most people knew the answer was going to be less than desirable. However, such information would have correctly priced the risk (to the shareholder not its agents--the management) so that we could have better managed the $20 Billion or so company specific (taking systemic market down turn, including telecom exposure, out) market value that perished.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Enterprise-wide Risk Management