Premise:
"With cooling sea breezes and good sandy beaches it offers all the basic ingredients needed for a relaxing vacation; Egyptian hoteliers and restaurateurs are working hard to provide the rest."
Hypothesis: Egypt offers anything but a relaxing vacation.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: Administrative support staff who assist travelers who achieve savings can also share in the savings awards. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Administrative support staff who helps travelers save money can get a kickback of up to $1000 a year."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Any sustained effort--conscious or unconscious--by a media conglomerate to slant the news in favor of its holdings will only damage the long-term value of its journalistic properties.", can we conclude that "The media must slant the news for journalistic integrity. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: oh easily i'm sure

Sentence B: I'm certain it is easy to do.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: So I, accordingly, went that way.
That way seemed the obvious way.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
As we explained in our June 22 letter, the Counsel failed to supply any evidence from the statutory language, legislative history, or case law to support the assertion that Congress intended the phrase existing law to exclude the Constitution, the highest law of the land.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Counsel produced sufficient evidence to support the assertion.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no