instruction:
Given a review text from amazon and its polarity (either positive or negative). Generate answer "True" if given sentence and its polarity match, otherwise generate answer "False". A review is considered positive if the reviewer is satisfied with the product. Otherwise, it is considered negative.
question:
Review: Playboy magazine May 2004Cover: Pamela AndersonPlaymate: Nicole WhiteheadInterview: Johnny Depp20 Questions: Matthew PerryPictorials: Remembering Helmut Newton Master of erotic photographyPam Anderson - Stripperella shows off.Features: Gunning For The Big Guy - Balco steroids investigationRaising The Bar - secrets for making great cocktailsSex Pistols - Vibrators tested.
Polarity: Negative
answer:
False

question:
Review: Without Stephen Gammell's artwork, these are pretty close to worthless.Why would they EVER replace the original, incredible artwork? The reality is, Harper Collins, that Stephen Gammell's artwork MADE these classics.The artwork now is unoriginal, not the least bit frightening (or artful), and does nothing to complement the stories.Huge mistake. Someone should be fired. At least five people should be fired... and blacklisted.This is an atrocity.Prospective buyers: go buy the other versions! Oh, that's right, they're extremely expensive. I wonder why, Harper Collins? You fools.And again for good measure: you fools.
Polarity: Positive
answer:
False

question:
Review: The way Bill Sloan wrote Jean Hill's side of her story of the assassination was in perfect terms. Jean Hill was the closest person to President Kennedy when the shots were fired and she saw where the shots came from and the feds tried to cover everything up. I believe that Jean Hill really knew and saw what happened that day in November. Anyone who would like to find out information about the assassination I believe this is the right book to read and hear what was truly covered up.
Polarity: Negative
answer:
False