input question: Would an admission of lying about Monica weaken Clinton's claims in the other Starr matters? If this premise is true, does that tell us:"It's clear an admission of lying would only give Clinton strength against all of Starr's matters -- who could disagree?"?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "yeah i think one thing that maybe would help people vote is if the polls were either open more days or you could mail it in or", can we conclude that "More people would probably vote if the polls were open more days."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: These effects include cognitive, sensory, and motor deficits.

Sentence B: They include a number of bodily defects.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: uh it will be quite a few because one brother has five children and they're all going to be there with their children
There will be over a dozen people in total.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
They meant nothing.

Here is a hypothesis:
They meant nothing about the battle.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
The British lived along the waterfront in Victoria (now Central) and on the cooler slopes of Victoria Peak.

Does it follow that "The British lived in Toronto. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no