In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Comment: No one is asking that Cornwallis be erased from any book. It would be great if the scope of Cornwallis' crimes were studied and published in detail. Public monuments like statutes are generally intended to honour individuals. We shouldn't be honouring Cornwallis.
Disagree

Comment: I am one who disagrees with you.

Those in society who derive greater financial benefit from it, owe it a greater percentage of their income.

In fact, I would go further, and stratify incomes into the tens of millions (56% on those over $500k, 66% over $5M, 76% over $15M, 86% over $30M - feel free to choose your own numbers here...). This is not a new idea - top tax brackets in the US in 1945 were 94% over $200k.

As well, in the booming 50's top tax rates were 91% (in the USA).
Disagree

Comment: You wish to continue to indulge in your hatred caused by irrational fears of Muslims without ever being called out for it. Well, you still have every freedom to spew Islamaphobia (and that's exactly what you're defending here) but others have every right to continue to call it for what it is. You and others continue to whine that you're not Islamaphobic and yet you never seem to be able to raise any non-bigoted, intelligent arguments about Islam. In fact, you almost certainly haven't read the Qoran either so please, tell us, what fact-based, reason-based arguments do you have then???????? M103 is a motion. Your hysterical response to it just highlights your irrationality even more.
Disagree