You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.

secured proof of claim was properly filed. The Court again wishes to stress that its holding today is limited to the facts of the case before it. The Court is not generally holding that replacement windows can never become fixtures or do not typically become part of the real estate to which .2008). See also 35A Am.Jur.2d Fixtures 19 (stating that "[t]he characterization put upon articles as fixtures or nonfix-tures by parties to a purchase contract should be upheld where the rights of third parties are not adversely affected, no statute suggests a contrary result, and the articles are not so completely merged with the realty as to prevent removal of the article without material injury to the realty.") 16 . Id. at 745-46. 17 . 77 B.R. 34 (Bankr.M.D.N.C.1987). 18 . Id. at 36. 19 . Id. (<HOLDING>). 20 . 800 S.W.2d 755 (Mo.App. W.D.1990). 21 .
Holding statements: (A) holding that when third party rights are involved the apparent intent to an outsider are determinative (B) holding that while general objections are discouraged they are valid to preserve error when the ground of the objection is apparent (C) holding that apparent authority refers to a third partys reasonable belief that the principal has authorized the acts of its agent it arises from the principals indirect or direct manifestations to a third party (D) holding that a litigant may not claim standing to assert the rights of a third party (E) holding that a third party has authority to consent to a search if the third party is a coinhabitant
Output:
holding that while general objections are discouraged they are valid to preserve error when the ground of the objection is apparent