Question:
Based on the premise "By varying the estimated values for cost drivers, the auditor may also be able to perform a sensitivity analysis illustrating where project estimates are most susceptible to change.", can we conclude that "The auditor can do a sensitivity analysis that shows where estimates are likely to change."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: it's better for for a large yard

Sentence B: It's great because most big yards are easy to maintain.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: However, if I know the new way is inappropriate, I cannot be permitted to cave.
I should be allowed to give in if the new way is good.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
The group found enough uninjured horses to mount.

Here is a hypothesis:
Unfortunately, all of the horses were injured and unable to be ridden.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: i don't care

Sentence 2: This doesn't effect me.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Further, our work has shown that U.S. agencies have benefited from their use of results-oriented performance agreements for political and senior career executives."
Hypothesis: According to our work, political and senior career executives benefit US agencies through agreements.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes