Here is an email: I just entered a commodity rate on deal 299159. It has very big volumes on it each month and there has not been a commodity rate on it. Joanne just verified that this is regular transport, not Dayton or CALP. This will be a big OA variance for June - August. This deal is for deliveries to Storage. Would you verify if ACA and GRI are billed for storage deliveries please?
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: CGAS deals
Q: We are short 100 mw's in the Ercot Asset book for hours ending 7-22. We want to remain that way, unless the balancing energy market goes haywire. We would need to delete our SC counterparty EL Paso and input a replacement QSE in the portal if this is filled. Enpower shows 100 mw's coming from Ercot imbalance. This deal would need to be cut and replaced with the power that was purchased for bal-day, etc. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: Position for tomorrow
IN: Jackie - Woodward is calling....contract #33175 has deliveries to Canon City, 60 dth per day, and I see it on your spread sheet, but it is not in path manager, and not on the contract. Can you please look into this asap. The guy at Woodward is wanting a call back from Paul Lucci today. Thanks, Gloria

Generate a subject line.

OUT: CIG 10/01
IN: This is an email
David, Doug asked me to get you a list of our top counterparties in ERCOT. Below is our list: Calpine Dynegy Mirant Aquila Constellation El Paso TXU Reliant ANP Marketing FP&L BP Amoco LCRA Morgan Stanley Call me if you have questions. Thanks

What is the subject?

OUT: ERCOT Counterparties
QUESTION: Jeff: Per my voice mail, please let me know if Friday, May 12 is an acceptable date for your group. This works fine for Settlements. Thanks. Sara
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Confirmation/Settlements lunch
IN: Greg (Adams), Attached is our cash forecast. There are several important points to keep in mind with this forecast: 1. This is our best guess at this point. As other business units clarify their business plans, it will affect our activity. Once their plans are set and communicated to us, we can better forecast our numbers. 2. This forecast represents the estate only. (Since that is what we discussed in the meeting on Monday) We have made no attempt to forecast NETCo since that has already been done and is seperate. 3.Infrastructures numbers are somewhat soft due to the Outlook problems experienced yesterday. As they firm up or we get additional information, we can update numbers. 4. We have not included any future severance or retainage payments as we discussed. 5. I have included a tab which attempts to segregate costs by business unit. Again, this is soft and will be better defined as the business units define their plans. 6. I will be out of the office after today for a while. If you have questions after today, contact Mike Galvan (x3-5439) or Kevin May (x5-2508) 7. I have not put this file on the O: drive since it is being emailed. Let me know if I need to. Kerry (x5-4895)

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
ENW Estate Cash Forecast