Question: Sentence A: The supplementary information published with the Final Rule clearly states the preemptive effect to be given to the rule; what, if any, retroactive effect its provisions may have; and the administrative procedures to be followed prior to any judicial challenge to provisions of the rule.

Sentence B: There are rules to any changes in the judicial system that have to be rigorously followed.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: With luck, you'll see a leopard draped indolently on a tree branch, and perhaps a stately sambar stag.
You can't see stately sambar stag's in the area.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
They could not travel upriver because several sets of cataracts blocked passage and they did not know that the waters traveled from the heartland of Africa.

Here is a hypothesis:
The presence of multiple cataract sets prevented them from travelling upriver.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: The tower comprises four stories, each a tapering cylinder with angular and convex ribs, separated by balconies.

Sentence 2: The tower is four stories high.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Even that, though, is a problematic concept.

Does it follow that "That concept is perfect."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "Sister should read the rules outside the door. I gathered from the little nurse's expression that there was not the least likelihood of her having the hardihood to retail this message to the dreaded "Sister". ", can we conclude that "She should read the rules posted and start to follow them."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell