In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Federal Employee Protection of
Disclosures Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF DISCLOSURES COVERED.

Section 2302(b)(8) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (A)--
(A) by striking ''which the employee or applicant
reasonably believes evidences'' and inserting '',
without restriction as to time, place, form, motive,
context, or prior disclosure made to any person by an
employee or applicant, including a disclosure made in
the ordinary course of an employee's duties, that the
employee or applicant reasonably believes is evidence
of''; and
(B) in clause (i), by striking ''a violation'' and
inserting ''any violation''; and
(2) in subparagraph (B)--
(A) by striking ''which the employee or applicant
reasonably believes evidences'' and inserting '',
without restriction as to time, place, form, motive,
context, or prior disclosure made to any person by an
employee or applicant, including a disclosure made in
the ordinary course of an employee's duties, of
information that the employee or applicant reasonably
believes is evidence of''; and
(B) in clause (i), by striking ''a violation'' and
inserting ''any violation (other than a violation of
this section)''.

SEC. 3. COVERED DISCLOSURES.

Section 2302(a)(2) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking ''and'' at the
end;
(2) in subparagraph (C)(iii), by striking the period at the
end and inserting ''; and''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
''(D) 'disclosure' means a formal or informal
communication, but does not include a communication concerning
policy decisions that lawfully exercise discretionary authority
unless the employee providing the disclosure reasonably
believes that the disclosure evidences--
''(i) any violation of any law, rule, or
regulation; or
''(ii) gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds,
an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific
danger to public health or safety.''.

SEC. 4. REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION.

Section 2302(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by
adding at the end the following: ''For purposes of paragraph (8), any
presumption relating to the performance of a duty by an employee who
has authority to take, direct others to take, recommend, or approve any
personnel action may be rebutted by substantial evidence. For purposes
of paragraph (8), a determination as to whether an employee or
applicant reasonably believes that such employee or applicant has
disclosed information that evidences any violation of law, rule,
regulation, gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of
authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or
safety shall be made by determining whether a disinterested observer
with knowledge of the essential facts known to or readily ascertainable
by the employee or applicant would reasonably conclude that the actions
of the Government evidence such violations, mismanagement, waste,
abuse, or danger.''.

SEC. 5. NONDISCLOSURE POLICIES, FORMS, AND AGREEMENTS.

(a) Personnel Action.--Section 2302(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United
States Code, is amended--
(1) in clause (x), by striking ''and'' at the end;
(2) by redesignating clause (xi) as clause (xii); and
(3) by inserting after clause (x) the following:
''(xi) the implementation or enforcement of any
nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement; and''.
(b) Prohibited Personnel Practice.--Section 2302(b) of title 5,
United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (11), by striking ''or'' at the end;
(2) in paragraph (12), by striking the period and inserting
a semicolon; and
(3) by inserting after paragraph (12) the following:
''(13) implement or enforce any nondisclosure policy, form,
or agreement, if such policy, form, or agreement does not
contain the following statement:
'''These provisions are consistent with and do not supersede,
conflict with, or otherwise alter the employee obligations, rights, or
liabilities created by Executive Order No. 12958; section 7211 of title
5, United States Code (governing disclosures to Congress); section 1034
of title 10, United States Code (governing disclosures to Congress by
members of the military); section 2302(b)(8) of title 5, United States
Code (governing disclosures of illegality, waste, fraud, abuse, or
public health or safety threats); the Intelligence Identities
Protection Act of 1982 (50 U.S.C. 421 and following) (governing
disclosures that could expose confidential Government agents); and the
statutes which protect against disclosures that could compromise
national security, including sections 641, 793, 794, 798, and 952 of
title 18, United States Code, and section 4(b) of the Subversive
Activities Control Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 783(b)). The definitions,
requirements, obligations, rights, sanctions, and liabilities created
by such Executive order and such statutory provisions are incorporated
into this agreement and are controlling.'; or
''(14) conduct, or cause to be conducted, an investigation,
other than any ministerial or nondiscretionary factfinding
activities necessary for the agency to perform its mission, of
an employee or applicant for employment because of any activity
protected under this section.''.

SEC. 6. EXCLUSION OF AGENCIES BY THE PRESIDENT.

Section 2302(a)(2)(C) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by
striking clause (ii) and inserting the following:
''(ii)(I) the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the
Central Intelligence Agency, the Defense Intelligence
Agency, the National Imagery and Mapping Agency, the
National Security Agency; and
''(II) as determined by the President, any
Executive agency or unit thereof the principal function
of which is the conduct of foreign intelligence,
counterintelligence activities, or homeland security,
if the determination (as that determination relates to
a personnel action) is made before that personnel
action; or''.

SEC. 7. DISCIPLINARY ACTION.

Section 1215(a)(3) of title 5, United States Code, is amended to
read as follows:
''(3)(A) A final order of the Board may impose--
''(i) disciplinary action consisting of removal, reduction
in grade, debarment from Federal employment for a period not to
exceed 5 years, suspension, or reprimand;
''(ii) an assessment of a civil penalty not to exceed
$1,000; or
''(iii) any combination of disciplinary actions described
under clause (i) and an assessment described under clause (ii).
''(B) In any case in which the Board finds that an employee has
committed a prohibited personnel practice under paragraph (8) or (9) of
section 2302(b), the Board shall impose disciplinary action if the
Board finds that the activity protected under such paragraph (8) or (9)
(as the case may be) was the primary motivating factor, unless that
employee demonstrates, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the
employee would have taken, failed to take, or threatened to take or
fail to take the same personnel action, in the absence of such
protected activity.''.

SEC. 8. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE STUDY ON REVOCATION OF
SECURITY CLEARANCES.

(a) Requirement.--The Comptroller General shall conduct a study of
security clearance revocations, taking effect after 1996, with respect
to personnel that filed claims under chapter 12 of title 5, United
States Code, in connection therewith. The study shall consist of an
examination of the number of such clearances revoked, the number
restored, and the relationship, if any, between the resolution of
claims filed under such chapter and the restoration of such clearances.
(b) Report.--Not later than June 30, 2006, the Comptroller General
shall submit to the Committee on Government Reform of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate
a report on the results of the study required by subsection (a).

SEC. 9. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act shall take effect 30 days after the date of enactment of
this Act.
Federal Employee Protection of Disclosures Act - (Sec. 2) Includes as a protected disclosure by a federal employee any lawful disclosure an employee or applicant for employment reasonably believes is credible evidence of waste, abuse, gross mismanagement, or substantial and specific danger to public health or safety without restriction as to time, place, form, motive, context, or prior disclosure. (Sec. 3) Defines the term "disclosure" to mean a formal or informal communication, but does not include a communication concerning policy decisions that lawfully exercise discretionary authority unless the employee providing the disclosure reasonably believes that the disclosure evidences: (1) any violation of any law, rule, or regulation; or (2) gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety. (Sec. 4) Codifies the legal standard for determining whether a whistleblower has a reasonable belief that a disclosure evidences governmental waste, fraud, or abuse, or a violation of law. (Sec. 5) Includes under the definition of "personnel action" the implementation or enforcement of any nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement. Prohibits taking the following actions against whistleblowers making protected disclosures: (1) the implementation or enforcement of any nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement; and (2) an investigation (other than routine nondiscretionary agency investigations) of an employee or applicant. (Sec. 6) Authorizes the President to exclude certain agencies engaged in the conduct of foreign intelligence or counterintelligence activities from whistleblower protections if such exclusion is made prior to any personnel action against the whistleblower. (Sec. 7) Expands the authority of the Merit Systems Protection Board to impose disciplinary action for prohibited personnel practices. (Sec. 8) Requires a Government Accountability Office (GAO) study on security clearances revocations taking effect after 1996 with respect to personnel that filed claims in connection with such security clearance revocations. (Sec. 9) Permits an employee, former employee, or applicant to bring an action against the United States at law or equity for de novo review as an alternative recourse in seeking corrective action with respect to a prohibited personnel practice. (Sec. 10) Amends the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 to modify remedy and enforcement authority under provisions relating to the protection of contractor employees from reprisal for disclosure of certain information, including by permitting such an employee who has been subjected to a reprisal prohibited by such provisions to bring an action at law or equity for de novo review in order to seek compensatory damages and other relief available under those provisions. Makes an identical amendment with respect to federal military law relating to the protection of military contractor employees from reprisal for disclosure of certain information. (Sec. 11) Makes certain prohibited personnel practices provisions applicable to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA).