QUESTION: Can we conclude from "Little kid on a man's shoulders and another man holding a blue backpack in front of a canyon." that "A kid on his father's shoulders."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: A kid not a man's shoulders does not indicate the boy is on his father's shoulders.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A blond-haired man dressed in dark colors sitting next to a woman dressed in green and wearing a black beret." that "Tango dancers cross the dance floor."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The couple can not be both sitting and crossing the dance floor.
The answer is no.

Q: Given the sentence "An advertisement on the side of a green building with a man in a blue shirt walking nearby." can we conclude that "The man is walking in front of an advertisement."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A man walking near building with an advertisement on the side could be said to be walking in front of an advertisement.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Premise: "A construction worker is working on the side of a bridge."
Hypothesis: "A construction worker is working at a computer."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: He could not be on a computer if he were on the side of a bridge because there are not computers in that location.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A group of 5 boy scouts standing on a stage." is it true that "A bunch of boy scouts are standing at their award ceremony."?
The boy scouts may not be on stage for an award ceremony specifically.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A large group of people in a red raft wearing red life jackets on the river."
Hypothesis: "A large group of people are on the river."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A:
A group is on the river regardless of what they are wearing.
The answer is yes.