Given a paragraph, generate a claim that is supported by the given paragraph. 1) The claim must contain information from within the paragraph. 2) A sentence within the paragraph can be used as a claim. 3) The claim should not have contradictions within the paragraph. 4) The claim should be at most one sentence long.

Q: The story does not mention the costs of screening or follow-up tests or treatment to the individual or, collectively, to society. Those costs are significant. This story uses several different statistics and expert perspectives to explain what the researchers found in their examination of the effects of mammography screening. It not only include the relative risk reduction (10 percent) and an absolute risk reduction statistic (among women in their 50s, a decade of screening would boost the likelihood of avoiding a fatal breast cancer from 995.6 out of 1,000 to 996 out of 1,000), but it also offered comments from different experts about how they would personally value effects of that size. The story notes that screening mammography exposes women to false alarms scares as well as the risks and harms of treating tumors that actually would not have become life-threatening. This story explains how this study is different from earlier research on mammography. It points out both advantages of the study methods (comparing women in regions with screening to those without as Norway rolled out a national program over a 9 year period) and limitations (an observational study like this is not as powerful as a randomized trial, and the study might have found more benefits to screening if it had lasted longer). The story also noted the uncertainty in the numbers the researchers reported and that the real differences might be different. The story does not exaggerate the risk of breast cancer or the need to be screened for it. The story includes comments from several independent sources offering a variety of perspectives. It does not mention that the study was funded by the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Research Council of Norway. The story notes that improved treatments appear to have reduced the breast cancer death rate even among women who did not have regular screening mammograms. Not being screened was clearly acknowledged as an alternative, something not all competing stories explicitly addressed. The availability of mammography screening is not at issue. This story does point out that the women who were screened in Norway had access to special treatment teams. And it noted that these treatments are available at "many major medical centers in the United States." Mammography is not new, but this story does a good job of explaining what is new about the way these researchers examined the effects of screening. The story includes comments from several sources and does not appear to rely on a news release.

A: Mammograms' Value in Cancer Fight at Issue
****
Q: But as other Democrats already in the race endorse "Medicare-for-all," Hickenlooper told a crowd at a New Hampshire college that it was more important now to get behind the general idea rather than argue over a specific approach. "I reject the notion that it should become a litmus test of what it takes to be a good Democrat," said Hickenlooper, who expanded Medicaid while governor and has teamed with former Gov. John Kasich, R-Ohio, on a health care overhaul. The onetime Denver mayor, who's considered a centrist politician, said after holding a town hall that he will not decide for several more weeks whether to join the crowded 2020 contest. He took questions mostly from students and faculty on topics including student debt, the ballooning national debt and relations with American allies around the world. Hickenlooper said he was concerned that the push for "Medicare-for-all" calls for dismantling the current system when less disruptive measures may achieve universal health care. "There are so many different ways to cut the pie and work on the issue that we too often are trying to say, 'You're wrong, I'm right,' and this is even within the Democrat Party," he said. "It's more important to be unified and say we want universal coverage. We are not going to stop until we get universal coverage." With Sens. Kamala Harris of California and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts already running, the challenge for Hickenlooper is showing he is liberal enough to compete. He cited liberal policies he enacted as governor dealing with methane emissions and teenage pregnancies and abortion. "In many ways, I'm a lot more progressive than a lot of these other folks," he asserted. Hickenlooper also insisted he would have no problem going up against President Donald Trump. "I grew up the skinny kid with thick glasses and a funny last name. I've dealt with bullies my whole life," he said. "The way to deal with a bully is you don't punch back and take them head on. You take what they say to you and ... you reframe it in a way that reveals the foolishness of what they're saying and the weakness and insecurity that they're demonstrating." After his New Hampshire swing, Hickenlooper is scheduled to give an address at the Global Security Conference in Munich this weekend about trade and the trans-Atlantic partnership. The trip would help burnish the former governor's foreign policy credentials ahead of any possible presidential campaign.

A: Ex-Colorado Gov. Hickenlooper supports universal health care.
****
Q: "The story listed the cost per unit for all three creams. The story didn't provide the numbers from a cited 1994 study on capsaicin benefits. Overall, the message of ""no good evidence"" was clear. But, confusingly, the story gave the last word to a rheumatologist who said some of these creams ""do seem to help some peopleit can give you temporary relief."" If you're going to do that, we think you need to provide numbers. How many people? How long is temporary? To end the story in this way without numbers to back up this flip-flop of a message was disappointing. The story was clear about lack of effectiveness overall and that with the capsaicin cream, ""the burning sensation is often intolerable."" The story went right to the point: ""there's no good evidence that any over-the-counter rub or cream offers real relief for arthritis, Altman says. Very few high-quality studies have ever investigated the products, he says, and the results that do exist have been far from convincing."" There was no disease-mongering of the pain of arthritis. Two expert sources in rheumatology were interviewed. The story danced around the topic of a placebo effect without ever directly addressing it. And it didn't make any direct comparison with aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or with heating pads or other options. The over-the-counter availability of the creams is clear in the story. The story offered this context: ""Over the centuries, people have been willing to rub all sorts of things into their sore joints. Today, arthritis sufferers can choose from a wide range of over-the-counter creams with different approaches to relief."" By the end of the story it was clear that today's creams may not offer much advancement over what's been done with rubs through the centuries. It's safe to assume that the story did not rely on a news release."

A:
Arthritis creams are probably better than goat tears
****