Detailed Instructions: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
See one example below:
Problem: Comment: It's bad enough we already have all these American sicko's living in this country shooting up theatre, schools, churches, malls, etc., we don't have room for crazy muslims.
Solution: Identity-attack
Explanation: This comment contains identity attacks on both American and Muslim.

Problem: Comment: You ignore the fundamental hypocrisy of NAACP that solely and exclusively advocate for blacks or "colored people" (the same 19th C. descriptor used in 1909 and continues). The organization has zero to do with any other Americans. The fundamental crux of "inclusion" is to embrace other people. Like Pacific-Islanders? Native Americans? Asian-Americans? Hispanic/Latinos? Bi-racial? Multi-racial? Undesignated? Get the picture?

Are we talking about income inequality, access to education, job opportunities or the like? Oh, only for "CP"? The U.S. has the lowest social mobility for people in the middle-and-lower economic classes since the first Gilded Age. When the NAACP or La Raza or the like show up for their "exclusivity" we all lose. Tens of millions of Americans are mired in poverty and transgenerational poverty. Good thing we only look at their skin tone. I guess that's why the NAACP has offices on NA Reservations or Guam/ASamoa/PR?
Solution:
Non-identity-attack