IN: This is an email
When: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:15 PM-4:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Where: Gerald's Office EB - 3883 *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Discussion of default and contract fulfillment risk between: 1. Wholesale generation + ancillaries provider 2. NTEC 3. Rusk County Electric Co-op

What is the subject?

OUT: Oakhill Default Risk Issues
QUESTION: Mark, do you have any customers that we could invite as a guest to this event. I would be more than happy to host. I have tickets for the Sunday race.... Oct.7. Let's discuss on Monday. BT
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Texaco Grand Prix
Louise, I am sorry to bother you at such a critical time, because I know you are doing everything you can to salvage the remaining pieces at Enron and are working long & tiresome hours to achieve this difficult matter. However, I felt like I had to at least let you know my thoughts on the following. Dave Forster & I met a couple of weeks ago on his initiative to discuss the proposed retention bonuses for my group. I was asked to review the preliminary numbers by individual. I was allowed to move dollars but NOT allowed to increase the total dollar figure for my group. Frankly, the numbers seemed pretty low. Assuming the goal is to retain key employees for Netco, I am not confident these numbers will achieve this. I know several people in my group are interviewing outside of the company. I have asked them to be patient, not make any quick decisions, and give us a chance to see this through. Dave told me the figures were based on mid year evaluations. As you know, mid year evaluations are typically lower than year end. The mid year evaluation allows the employee time to improve in order to get to the desired level by year end. I understand the need for a reference point of some sort and mid year was the latest figure available. However, because the retention numbers were based on this, they are significantly lower. My intentions are not to show any disrepect to Dave by discussing this with you but I wanted to make sure my thoughts /opinions were communicated to you. If Dave has already discussed this with you, I apologize for the duplication. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me. I am on holiday & will be traveling today but can be reached on my cell at 713-446-9669. Thank you for your time.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Proposed Retention Bonuses for Netco
Last week we completed preliminary ROCAR calculations on the following deals: ROCAR Georgia Pacific/Leaf River 29.03% Owens DSM 10.75% Project Oz 2.74% These results place Georgia Pacific at the high end of all of the deals we have looked at so far. The ROCAR for GP includes the impact of the swap which only slightly improved the return (versus the asset only) due to the credit risk associated with a BBB minus credit. Owens is about on par with other energy management deals we have seen coming out off EES. Operational risk (implementation/contract risk) is considered low due to the ongoing nature of the project. Project Oz is one of the worst deals we have analyzed. Margins are very thin, and due to the illiquid nature of the asset, market risk is very large (1 day VAR $45MM). Since most of the ROCAR's are still not included on the DASH, I will provide you with weekly updates on the current deals we are analyzing. Regards,
Answer: ROCAR Update
Here is an email: Attached is a draft of the "Final Working Capital Calculation Statement" that would be attached to the letter that Anne is drafting that needs to be sent to AEP before Friday. These agree to the amounts that we previously sent to AEP in a letter earlier this month except for a slight adjustment to the Centanna Ad Valorem Tax Expense number as I received an updated number from the Tax Department this week. I have also told Jim Dedicker at AEP that I will forward him a copy of the bill from Jefferson County once we receive it. Also keep in mind that this working capital calculation statement does not include the working gas adjustments for Bammel and Centanna which were already sent in a "Final Working Gas Calculation Statement" on 10/15. Please review and verify these numbers and let me know if you think anything needs to changed, added, or omitted ASAP! Thanks
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Final Working Capital Schedule
QUESTION: Gerald, Does LCDR mean Lieutenant Commander? On my last email his title was LT, just lieutenant. I guess that means our boy has been promoted...... The Horns weren't too impressive on Sat.............I was going to go to the Colorado game, but I think I might skip now, seems like the whole season is shot.........
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Still here and still ready...