QUESTION: Premise: "A borders bookstore employee is wearing a black shirt."
Hypothesis: "The borders employee is required to wear a black shirt."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: The Borders employee could be wearing the black shirt out of his own choice not because he is required to wear it.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Scantily-clad woman holding boy in red shirt." is it true that "A boy is holding a woman."?
Either boy is holding a woman or woman is holding him.
The answer is no.

Q: Given the sentence "A man in a black shirt stands in front of books on shelves." can we conclude that "A man in a black shirt is standing in front of books."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A man in a black shirt standing in front of books stands in front of books.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: If "Group of cyclists spotted on an asian highway." does that mean that "Some cyclists are competing."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Just because cyclists are on a highway doesn't imply they are competing.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] If "A legless man is walking next to a man in a bright yellow shirt." does that mean that "The man with no legs is the spring blade attachment."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A legless man is walking next to a man doesn't necessarily imply he has the spring blade attachment.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A couple walks down a dirt street."
Hypothesis: "A couple walk together down road while a carriage drives past them."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A:
The street could have been empty with no carriage in sight.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.