Q: Michelle, Can you please prepare 2 executable employment agreements for Stewart Seeligson. All terms have been approved by D. Oxley. The revised terms are: Base Salary: $200,000 Sign on Cash: $100,000 Term: 11/16/01 - 11/15/02 Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: Employment Agreement - S. Seeligson
IN: RBoyle@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: Section 4.2.1 of the ICAP manual states that the DMNC testing period for the summer capability period will end on September 15. If you have not performed a DMNC test, time is running out. Bob Boyle

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Reminder that the DMNC testing for Summer 2001 is nearing an end - September 15
IN: This is an email
Hello, I am a Tax Analyst currently working on Co. 102's (The Protane Corporation) and Co. 214's (Citadel Corporation Limited) federal tax returns. I need the following four issues resolved to complete their tax returns. If you are not the correct accountant(s), could you please tell me who is? I would appreciate this information by Friday, April 27. It appears that on November 3, 2000 Co. 214 sold its 100% interest in Co. 218 (Citadel Venezolana, S.A.) to Co. 102 for 8,000,000 Venezuelan Bolivars. (If you need documentation for your research, I have the interoffice memo concerning this transaction.) There are four issues I have with this transaction: 1) As of 12/31/00, Co. 214 still has an Investment in Subsidiary balance of $1,760,000 and Equity Earnings of $494,508.83 relating to Co. 218. Should not these balances be $0? Also would there have been an intercompany gain/loss associated with this stock sale? 2) As of 12/31/00, Co. 102 shows no Investment in Subsidiary nor Equity Earnings balance relating to Co. 218. Should not there be a balance for Co. 218 which equals the USD equivalent of $8,000,000 Venezuelan Bolivars? Also, should not the Equity Earnings ($494,508.83) from Co. 218 posted on Co. 214 be posted on Co. 102? 3) As of 12/31/00, Co. 218 shows capital stock of $1,760,000 owned by Co. 214. Should not this capital stock be shown to be owned by Co. 102? 4) As of 12/31/00, Co. 214 is showing a $6,000,000 entry in "Other Deductions" (The credit side of the journal entry hits "Deferred Credits."). I need more detail concerning this amount. Could this be the consideration received from Co. 102 relating to the stock sale mentioned above? If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Thank you for your time,

What is the subject?

OUT: Need information concerning Co. 102, 214, and 218.
QUESTION: ok....am wondering if i can get some feedback on attendance for a b-day outing this sat. night in houston...any takers? i know some of you expressed interest, some requested sat night b/c of a whirlwind social calendar (alan wins! ), and some....have dropped off the face of the earth. peace out, mes amis- emily ps....pass along to those i've missed, s'il vous plait
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: saturday?
Hi Vonda Even though, I know I'll probably be at a disadvantage because of my notification deadline, I'll try again on the S. Texas piece. If my memory serves me right, you were looking for a daily call option on the S.Texas piece. Enron offers the following: Period: November, 2001 - March, 2002 Region: Trunkline South Texas Pool Volume: 10,000 MMBtu/d Demand Charge: $0.0425 per MMBtu for the above referenced time period times the volume, for the right to receive the volumes on a daily basis at the Trunkline S. Texas " Gas Daily Daily" price. Notification Time: 7:30 a.m. Thanks
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Nov, 2001-Mar, 2002 Offer at Trkl S. Texas
Hi, Barry, To help me prepare for our meeting: What role does Stephanie play? Will you be speaking for both Canada and US when we talk? Most important: Do you like paella? Ray
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Meeting with PG&E