Q: Bob: Thanks for the memo and we should discuss in a future meeting dedicated to form changes. If we adopt the 2000 Definitions in our Schedule, we will also need to change the existing reference in Part 6(f)(iii) to "Negotiated Fallback" (to Section 7.5(c)(iv)) Also, the term "Relevant Price" is used in the "Negotiated Fallback" definition. We should clarify whether we need to retain Part 6(f)(iv) of the Schedule when using "Negotiated Fallback" or whether we intend that "Fallback Reference Dealers" be an entirely separate and distinct fallback (i.e. the 4th fallback in our Schedule).
Propose a subject line
A: ISDA 2000 Supplement to the 1993 Commodity Derivatives Definitions

Q: Do you have any credit issues w/ NW? They would like to have a GISB. Previously we had a GISB in place, but has "trade suspended". Please advise. Thanks!
Propose a subject line
A: New Waskom Gas Gathering, Inc.

Q: I will be stopping by this morning to distribute the pages that were missing from the "Options" section in your Deriviatives I binder. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: Missing pages from binder

Q: Dave: Here is the agreement I received from London which I have revised to apply to the Chicago situation. Let's consider this a rough draft at present. It does identify some interesting issues regarding how this will work. let's get together and go through it and see what we need and what we don't. Let me know what time works for you. Mark
Propose a subject line
A:
Back to Back Agreement