Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: There is a long history of the elders in a society believing that the past is superior to the present and that the young are incapable of ensuring the future.

It is, however, my personal perception of an extreme and growing polarization of two-party politics and a reluctance to seek or accept compromise that has become the norm in my lifetime.
Example Output: No

Example Input: I realize that I've been critical of Obama in the past, but when I step back and look at what he's accomplished I have to admit I'm impressed. Obamacare is a huge advance over what we had (nothing). Serious action to address climate change. Appointed highly qualified supreme court justices that aren't hyper political and conservative.

He was far from perfect. Too much militarism, too cozy with big business and all that. But given the congress he had to deal with he made more progress can I expected. And just think if he had lost either election.

The republicans deserve Trump. And they deserve the drubbing they're going to get. Bernie or Hillary will crush him.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: You are a textbook example why liberalism is a mental illness. While making ridiculous statements how Indian mascots created by Native American's are racially offensive to Indians, you then have no problem making racist remarks mocking my Chickasaw name. At no time are you capable of posting anything remotely intelligent, and then when your ridiculous opinion is called out with facts you can't refute, predictably you run like a coward, and post grade school insults. I truly pity people like you.
Example Output:
Yes