Problem: Here is a premise:
For example, we've mentioned in previous testimony the overlapping and duplicative food safety programs in the federal government.

Here is a hypothesis:
We've mentioned overlapping and duplicative food safety programs in the federal government in our previous testimony.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: I have learned to find my way around better, although that is still a problem and I think that a technology that can deliver so much information should be able to provide better guidance on the screen and not require reference to a printed magazine.

Sentence 2: I used to get lost all the time because I didn't have a phone.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Amusing roadside Americana is basically a bad restaurant in the shape of a big chicken.

Does it follow that "Americana is amusing but it is a bad restaurant."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If Its basilica, like the peaceful medieval town center, has been beautifully preserved, and the centuries-old pilgrim trade manages (sometimes just barely) to avoid the unashamed commercialism that blights other religious shrines., can we say that "The basilica was destroyed to make room for a shopping mall."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"But he had seen enough."
Hypothesis: He had to leave soon.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: capable of being verified, and linked to the data in such a manner that, if the data are changed, the signature is invalidated.

Sentence 2: The validity of the signature is dependent upon the data remaining the same.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell