In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: Hmmmmm.
Let me see. Someone to the south of us was just judged best suited for the task of the presidency solely because of his business background.
And he was celebrated during the campaign because he didn't "come across as "wishy washy."
That ain't working out too well.
Maybe we should apply some other criteria when selecting these guys.
To quote Betrand Russell:
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt."
[A]: Non-identity-attack

[Q]: Comment: To All the posters here, taxi cab drivers, and everyone else who cuts hair, who really knows how to run our muni, you should have exactly One And only One say.

Here's mine: Mark Begich is the biggest loser ever in Alaska - so ignore his noise. Why is he rated a loser? He is quite under-accomplished. He has only a high school degree, from Steller in the 80s no less, when all one had to do is show up in the "lizard lounge" (main office area) to be counted present. Mark Begich is a loser, in many ways, and is not in any way fit to be anything other than a slum landlord which is how he got his Alaskan politics start. His pals did a hit on Ted Stevens, which later was proven untrue.
Do your homework people, you will discover the truth!
While Bill Walker's proposals are not to my liking, I can respect his proposals, understand his effort to solve our state problems, for absolutely sure. mark begich - not so much!
[A]: Non-identity-attack

[Q]: Comment: Puerile and pathetic.
[A]:
Non-identity-attack