In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: It's like the track. Go to one at the end of the day and you see people sitting, in shock, holding well-thumbed tickets that no matter how much they check and recheck them, are not giving them back their last $20. And now how to get home? Call their daughter and explain, again, how they were so close this time? A voluntary tax on the poor who pay for my fancy new hockey facility. Water on the bench! It's atrocious.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Right Steve, because the McGuinty, Butts, Wynne's "green" plan is paying off in spades... the Ontario Liberals are a national embarrassment, they have no credibility and their "green" plan has turned out to be an absolute failure. Canadians who actually work for a living understand this, the smug limousine liberals who will be protected by fat golden pensions couldn't care less about rising costs of living and weaker economic competitiveness, it's not going to have any material impact on Wynne's ability to sip daiquiris in Cabo. This new tax will hurt working Canadians with higher living expenses and less economic opportunity.Trudeau operates with a smug sense of unearned entitlement, he lives in a cushioned dream of puff and ignorance. Butts sewered Ontario and now he wants to double down with the same incompetent policies on the rest of Canada.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Question: If the person was a drunk girl who had passed out......and the nurses were a college football team who.....lifted/removed items of clothing.....to admire her breasts, etc.....would any concern or outrage be the same, less, or more?
Output: Sexual-explicit