instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.
question:
Context: 'I think we'll both need each of the three items, but we can't split them evenly. How about I take 2 waters, 2 firewoods, and a food. You can have two food packages, a water, and a firewood.' 'hi bro, 2 water for 2 firewood 1 food for me'
Utterance: 'Do you need the extra water? I get super thirsty and I'd be willing to give up another firewood to get an extra water, while we still get at least one of each.'
answer:
Yes

question:
Context: 'No problem.🙂 So I will keep the 3 packages of water and, since I am giving you all 3 packages of the firewood I will take back the 1 food package and keep all 3 of the food packages.' 'I would still like at least 1 package of the food please. There has been a lot of rain in the area, but I think some poisonous mushrooms maybe prevalent in the area, so to be extra cautious I would like a little spare food on hand.' 'You don't have to eat the poison mushrooms. You can catch some fish from the river or hunt for small animals. You have all of the firewood so cooking the food should not be a problem.'
Utterance: 'I won't willingly eat the poisonous mushrooms, but it could be very hard to tell the difference from safe and toxic ones. I understand you will be staying in your area for a few extra days, but can you catch fish or hunt for small animals in your area too?'
answer:
Yes

question:
Context: 'I do. I have been looking everything over and feel this won't be to hard to come to an agreement' 'Well my camp places a premium on water. How would you feel about for me: 2 water, 1 food, 1 firewood?' 'I think we're on the right track. I am bring my 2 kids with me and they eat everything in sight.'
Utterance: 'Would they be okay with 2 food? Otherwise can give you an extra and I can take either an additional water or firewood 🙂'
answer:
Yes