Problem: Here is a premise:
The disposition of the revenue from forfeiture is determined by law.

Here is a hypothesis:
Forfeitures are informal affairs without set rules.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Professor Cleveland worked for two years (1994-1996) for Florida Legal Services as a Skadden Fellow, conducting civil impact litigation on behalf of Caribbean H-2A migrant farmworkers in the southeastern U.S.

Sentence 2: Professor Cleveland loved his time working for Florida Legal Services.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
In order to be comprehensive and cohesive, the researchers provide a great deal of detail and description and quote directly from the participants' own words and vignettes in the observers' field records.

Does it follow that "The observers' field records are quoted by the participants and the researchers are thorough in their descriptions."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If B. A lottery ticket that gives you a 10/11 chance of winning $5 million., can we say that "If there is a lottery ticket with 10/11 odds of winning, you will never lose."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"yeah i've i've got a two year old and we hunted Easter eggs yesterday and the weather was really nice"
Hypothesis: I hunted Easter eggs with my two year old yesterday, luckily the weather was great.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: the judge decides whether or not they should hear it

Sentence 2: The judge decides and cannot be persuaded.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell