Question: Sentence A: The plantation was bought in 1936 by English industrialist Sir Harold Mitchell and became an important focus for diplomatic, political, and social activities in Jamaica.

Sentence B: Sir Harold Mitchell moved to Jamaica in 1936.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: A pious Muslim, puritanical in both clothes and personal tastes, he banished music from the court and burned the portraits of princes as breaches of the Islamic taboo on graven images.
He was a musically inclined artistic ruler.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
we haven't talked much about the weather i know that's what we're supposed to do

Here is a hypothesis:
I know we're supposed to be talking about the weather even though we haven't much.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: uh okay go ahead yeah i understand the topic this morning is uh our policy in Latin America and you know what we've been doing down there so i don't know

Sentence 2: I'm not sure, Even though I understand it's our policy in Latin American, you know more about what we're doing down there.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
i can't think of what his name is right right off the bat though but uh they they they were fun they were real just books for fun

Does it follow that "The books were not fun, but I remember his name. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "Nowhere is that more clear than in the periodic appearance of what I call the Left-Behind White.", can we conclude that "This is unclear everywhere."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no