input question: Shakespeare wanted me to remind those who prefer a return to Admin Law Judges that What's past is prologue. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There are people who wish to return to Admin Law Judges."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "GAGAS incorporate all AICPA field work and reporting auditing standards and the related SASs unless the Comptroller General of the United States excludes them by formal announcement.", can we conclude that "GAGAS uses formal announcements to exclude audit standards."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: In regard to H-2A workers, the record demonstrates that Congress' purpose of providing meaningful representation to these workers cannot be accomplished under the three interpretations in the Federal Register.

Sentence B: H-2A workers need representation.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Chief Judge Robert M. Bell said his budget request is intended to maintain the same level of services that we have had in the last several years in terms of access to justice for the needy.
The budget request by Chief Judge Robert M. Bell is intended to maintain the same level.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
'I just want to steal all of your fans.'

Here is a hypothesis:
I don't want to take your fans.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
Speak Into the Ear Horn, Boy!

Does it follow that "Just whisper."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no