Definition: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
Input: Comment: What growth? Growth fuelled by social welfare for new immigrants from tax dollars is what they want. GDP per capita has been, and is, declining = middle to low income earners (the majority) are all making less (income) and paying more (taxes/COLA). This is directly correlated with the substantial increase in immigration in the early 90's. Therefore, we have over two decades of economic statistics that show high immigration levels are directly correlated with worsening economics for middle to lower income earners (the majority). Also directly correlated with widening income gap, where the very wealthy get even wealthier.

With 6.5 million youth entering the job market in the next decade and only 5 million boomers who may (not will) retire and reduce consumption, there is already labour oversupply coming. After that decade, demographics start to balance again UNLESS you want vast labour oversupply to depress wages and human rights - then you propose high immigration levels.
Output:
Non-toxic