Question:
Based on the premise "It is possible to walk along the walls, which seem to be swallowed up by the higher modern buildings of the city, to gain an impression of how large the citadel once was.", can we conclude that "When you walk on the walls you can understand how large the citadel used to be."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: no yeah i guess there was even a a bit of a ruckus caused by the MC Hammer who's really you know seems to be the hot one of of today he used um

Sentence B: MC Hammer is outdated and nobody likes him anymore.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: right and then you let it carry it downstream
Then you just let it get carried downstream.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
and it runs fifty eight i think fifty eight bucks a month something like that an that's not bad but you don't get anything

Here is a hypothesis:
it costs 58 dollars a month but you don't get anything.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: The success of These programs is best demonstrated by the fact that they have been close to meeting cost, schedule, and performance objectives.

Sentence 2: They are close to meeting objectives.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Because the FGD estimate based on availability of resources is much less than the amount of FGD capacity that would be cost effective to build, EPA ran model sensitivities constraining the amount of scrubber capacity that could be installed by 2005 at 10,000 MWe."
Hypothesis: Increasing the availability would help.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell