QUESTION: Per several conversations with Mirant (our upstream) and Pinwest (our downstream) the following situation occurred on July 19th between 2:30 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. Deal #694398 $41.00 our purchase from Mirant Deal #693496 $40.75 our sale to Pinwest Mirant(G)sp15-Ciso(t)sp15/pv5#scem_sp15_pv-Mirant-Epmi-Pinwest-aps(t)pv/ww#gf-Pinwest Mirant was cut by the CISO per Dan at the Mirant Real-time group. He was unable to re-supply an upstream. Pinwest would not allow the schedule to flow on a real-time basis per Carla on the scheduling desk. Enron agreed to bookout out with Pinwest and bill LD's to Mirant. I spoke with Glen Ryan at Pinwest at about 3:30 to agree on a price at which Enron would buy back the power in order to bookout. He said it would have to be the purchase price which was $345.00. In a later conversation about 3:45, I told Pinwest that we would not agree to the purchase price of $345.00 and that the current market price was around $45.00 - $50.00 per mw hour. They would not agree to the current market price and will bill us L.D. 's.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Liquidated Damages that need to be passed on to Mirant
Attached is the referenced list. Again, no european power products for US counterparties until further notice. Also, Renaissance is an Amended approval, so I just wrote in the corner-amended-no change, since I have no change in the earlier approvals I told you.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Counterparty Approval List for 1/21/00
John, Would you have 45 minutes later this week for Eric and myself? We'd like to give you a quick update on whats happening in the Atlantic basin in LNG, and also get an update from you on where the US Natgas market is heading. Thanks,
Answer: LNG Update
Here is an email: Here's the latest info. regarding Bloomberg's ability to accept deals with Pinnacle West (formerly Arizona Public Service Co.). From now on, we'll enter ALL deals with Pinnacle, despite Bloomberg's slow response to the counterparty name change. If you never knew that Bloomberg wasn't accepting confirms with the name Pinnacle on them, then disregard this message and continue as you were. Thanks,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Bloomberg-Pinnacle/APS deals
Q: Kevin, given the track record of mis-behaviour, I don't fault you with the = premise of guilt before understanding. But I would like to assure you that= despite the high valuations externally, which I probably agree are fantasy= , The Facility Services Group has a clear vision/market; it has a quality m= anagement team; it will be under my thumb and it is conservatively valued i= n the books. It is much more that a Blockbuster or other like structure. = If you would like to discuss in detail do not hesitate to give me a call an= d I will take you through it - both overall strategy and tactics. Even tho= ugh it has been a confluence of events which has caused our problems, the f= undamental root of most issues is an inactive management team which hasn't = managed the detail as well as we would like. New Power in my view would no= t have been as big a loser if we had kept it private and managed it closely= as a key part of the business. Instead we took it public and let it run a= mok. I think you can see parallels across the company. Initially well int= entioned and thought out strategies fall apart when not managed appropriate= ly. Regards
Propose a subject line
A: ServiceCo
Here is an email: Gerald, I gave confusing instructions to Daphne for the last draft and it was not what I wanted. Attached is a clean draft with the edits I suggest. Bill - GulfExpediteLetter2clean version2.doc
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
Another Draft