Problem: Now right here in Arizona, that difference would have been $131 million to the state of Arizona to help its kids be able to have better education and to lift the property tax burden from its citizens. The president reneged on his promise to fund No Child Left Behind.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The president broke his promise to Arizona by not funding No Child Left Behind."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: Yes
Q: This context involves flowers.
Flowers<br>Jill wanted a flower garden. So she got gardening supplies and seeds. After a week, her flower garden was complete. And she took care of it everyday. Gardening became Jill's favorite hobby.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: Yes
If according to Bloc Quebecois policy only individuals are allowed to contribute to the financing of political parties, how can the Bloc Quebecois justify that, in 1994, candidates for the Bloc Quebecois accepted corporate donations amounting to several thousand dollars in spite of the fact that their internal regulations preclude it?
The Bloc Quebecois had policy in place to control party finances before 1994. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: Yes
input hypothesis: ben had lived on a dark street
Context: Street lights<br>Ben lived on a dark street. There was an increase of car break-ins in his neighborhood. Ben started a petition to get street lights for his street. After the lights were placed, crime on his street dropped. The neighbors were glad that Ben started the petition.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
true or false: Yes
Context:
How to make a backyard badminton court<br>Decide where to make your badminton court. If you have a small backyard, you don't have many options except putting it in the middle. But if you have a bigger space, you can put your badminton court anywhere.
Hypothesis: Badminton requires a net OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
It's impossible to say
Problem: Based upon this possibility and given that the government has wasted almost $1 billion on cancellation fees and will spend much more on lawsuits, will the government attempt to save the Canadian taxpayer a large sum of money by purchasing the same helicopter for both search and rescue and maritime operations - in other words, return to commonality?

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "$1 billion was wasted."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A:
Yes