Q: Could one of you tell me how much gas we delivered to American Public Energy Agency in Dec 2001? in 2002 if any? I don't have a good way to search for deals but I did find 2 deals on Northern Natural Gas at the Demarc point. All of the information is below. It appears that both deals were pathed on contract 105515. There are 2 deals in Sitara for sales to American Public Energy Agency. Deal 310424 Term through 4/30/2011 Volume ?? It appears that all volumes on this deal were taken to 0 in Sitara on 12/18/2001. However, the volume pathed in Unify for this deal in Dec 2001 is 7,000 dth per day for the 1st - 4th and the 31st, a total pathed volume of 35,000 dth for the month. No volumes were pathed for the 5th - 30th. Pipeline Northern Natural Gas Deal 310690 Term through 5/31/2008 Volume 5,250 dth per day from 6/1/2001 through 5/31/2002. The volume pathed in Unify for this deal in Dec 2001 is 5,250 dth per day for the 1st - 4th and the 31st, a total pathed volume of 26,250 dth for the month. No volumes were pathed for the 5th - 30th. Pipeline Northern Natural Gas
Propose a subject line
A: American Public Energy Agency

Q: I have asked ENA's Compensation team within HR to conduct a compensation study for me for all positions from Manager level through Vice President. This analysis will include employees who are dedicated to ENA, EIM and EGM. It had been the plan to complete our compensation analysis by focusing on the Manager level and above, following the market analysis for Senior Specialists and below that was completed by Yvonne Land. I learned recently that Yvonne has left the Company and that she had not begun the analysis for Managers and above. Todd Burke, who recently joined Enron, will be conducting the market survey and compensation analysis. I met with Todd recently. He has had wonderful experience with Towers Perin and Watson Wyatt, and I feel that we are fortunate to have him devoted to this project. Please give sufficient thought and attention to requests from Todd. The quality and timeliness of your responses will directly impact the quality and timeliness of the analysis that I will receive from Todd. I think that you should each have a vested interest in the success of this project! Todd also plans to resurvey market information for Senior Specialists and below so that his view of compensation will be complete and timely for all of Energy Operations. Since we recently took action on compensation levels for key players at the Senior Specialist level and below, I would not anticipate further adjustments for those levels as a result of Todd's review. You should receive a message from Todd in the next day or so in which he will detail steps in the compensation analysis and what your role will be. Sally
Propose a subject line
A: Compensation Analysis

Q: For those teams that have turbines installed after 1990 and/or for those turbines which have undergone power unit changouts, the following recordkeeping and monitoring conditions apply: 1) DAILY recordkeeping of nitrogen and sulfur must be taken of the fuel gas which supplies the applicable turbine(s). 2) This recordkeeping consists of electronic recording (gas chromtograph for nitrogen and delmar or equivelant for sulfur) or stain tubes may also be used for sulfur. These DAILY records include measurements on Saturdays and Sundays. 3) The measurement must be taken at the location. An exception to this is that the nitrogen and sulfur measurements may be taken upstream or downstream of the applicable turbine facility provided that there are no natural gas deliveries into the pipe which would interfere or dilute/increase the measurements for the applicable turbine fuel gas. 4) Fuel gas records in hard copy form or equivalent for the nitrogen and sulfur must be maintained at the facility or at a central location for easy retrival. 5) A turbine facility may waiver out of this nitorgen and sulfur daily recordkeeping requirement by obtaining a custom fuel monitoring schedule (CFMS) from the EPA. Approval of a CFMS allows a greatly reduced recordkeeping and reporting for nitrogen and sulfur. CFMS requests have been submitted for the following facilities: P-1 C/S Plains Turbine C/S Atoka No 2 C/S Monument C/S Crawford C/S Bloomfield C/S Approvals have not as yet been obtained. Until issuance of a CFMS, an applicable facility is required to continue daily sampling for nitrogen and sulfur. Facilities which have received CFMS from the EPA include: La Plata C/S P-2 C/S Please be advised that there may be certain reporting requirements that might be required for each CFMS. I would strongly advise that the La Plata and Panhandle teams review their CFMS and include reporting dates into MCS, so that the deadlines and reportings are not missed. If you have a turbine facility which is subject to the nitrogen and sulfur reporting requirements and would like to reduce the reporting burden, contact Butch or myself.
Propose a subject line
A: Nitrogen and Sulfur reporting and Recordkeeping for Turbines

Q: Michelle, We are wanting to rescind Michael Slayton's offer of employment in Marlin Gubser's group. He is currently working at New Power and his start date with Enron is December 28th. He has not given notice because he has an agreement with New Power to stay on his current project until the end of the year. He has already signed and returned his offer letter. Marlin feels that Michael is a non-essential hire and would like to rescind his offer . Please advise how we should handle this situation. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A:
"Rescind Michael Slayton's Offer"