In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[EX Q]: Statement: Hindu ethics say that the path to salvation has three righteousness, prosperity honestly achieved, and, not least, pleasure. Choices: 1. The way to achieve prosperity honestly is written in Hindu texts. 2. Hindu ethics do not instruct you how to achieve salvation. 3. The path to salvation in Hindu ethics includes pleasure.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: During a NewsHour discussion of Vernon Jordan's testimony, Shields comes out with the bizarrely malapropos comment that Vernon Jordan's elocutionary style reminds him of nothing more than Barbara Jordan's measured diction. Choices: 1. Shields says something about Vernon Jordan that has no bearing on the proceedings. 2. In a moment of senile dementia, Shields loses the plot when speaking about Jordan. 3. During the discussion, Shields flew about the room and perched on the window sill.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: and yeah and uh i'll i talked to a thirteen year old last night who's uh goes to uh one of the Plano schools high schools or or junior highs i guess and she said that that she had a a choice she could either have taken tennis or weight lifting so she chose to take weight lifting Choices: 1. She decided to go for tennis instead of weight lifting. 2. She wants to be a professional weightlifter and compete at the Olympics. 3. The teenager I spoke to last night opted for weight lifting over tennis.
[EX A]:
2