Problem: Here is a premise:
First, we concluded that the LSC is not a federal agency for purposes of judicial review under the Administrative Procedures Act.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Administrative Procedures Act changed the view of the LSC.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: In the mountains of Tochigi Prefecture, about 150 km (93 miles) north of Tokyo by train, Nikko is the final resting place of Ieyasu, founder of the Tokugawa shogunate, who died in 1616.

Sentence 2: You can get to the Tochigi Prefecture by foot in a day, you have to use the train or a car.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Services also operate down the west coast to Rennes, Bordeaux, and the Pyrenees.

Does it follow that "It's possible to have service in Bordeaux."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If that's kind of scary to me that kind of to me it is more like vigilantism, can we say that "That scares me, I see it more like vigilantism."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"It's just there."
Hypothesis: There it is.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: The interchange is designed to place each of the OASDHI trust funds in the same position as it would have been if railroad employment had been covered under Social Security since its inception.

Sentence 2: The interchange did not place the OASDHI funds the same.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no