Detailed Instructions: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
See one example below:
Problem: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Solution: Sexual-explicit
Explanation: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.

Problem: Comment: We should all thank Loren for his fine reporting. He speaks facts to power. An interesting exercise would be to compare his fact-based information compared to the spin that will be reported in the Adventist Review.

We look forward to more of his balanced reporting and analysis of the serious problems being created by the current administration in power at the GC. It is with that hope that he will be reporting in 2020 when Wilson II will be replaced with someone who will undo the damage to the Adventist Church currently being caused by Wilson II and his supporters.

We can hope that a new GC president will resume the positive
developments that were slowly being implemented by the moderate GC president, Dr. Jon Paulsen. Wilson II and his misguided policies will then be discarded into "the dustbin of Adventist history."
Solution:
Non-sexual-explicit