Definition: Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.
Input: CONTEXT: I think the link from Napoleon Wilson provides valuable insight. Another consideration is the Indominus' intelligence. As it was already mentioned the canon establishes the Velociraptor as an intelligent creature that communicates and coordinates to attack prey, the T-Rex sees no such treatment. In the first film these two species are juxtaposed with one another to demonstrate the raw intelligence of the raptor which infers the T-Rex is in some way intellectually inferior. The T-Rex is a doer, not a thinker; brute not brain. The Indominus is also hyper intelligent, perhaps moreso than the raptors themselves. The creature could know that the raptors are more able and more willing to follow commands, where the T-Rex might not listen or might not even be at the capacity to communicate with it. <sep> Q: Why didn't the Indominus Rex eat or kill the Velociraptors? A: The creature could know that the raptors are more able and more willing to follow commands Q: Why did the Indominus REx fight with the T-Rex? A: the T-Rex is in some way intellectually inferior Q: Why did the Indominus Rex eat its sibling? A: The T-Rex is a doer, not a thinker; brute not brain Q: What did Claire observe about the Indominus Rex? A: The Indominus is also hyper intelligent, perhaps moreso than the raptors themselves <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How did they communicate?
Output:
No