Question: Sentence A: The Byzantines built the splendid gate on the ruins of earlier ones.

Sentence B: The Byzantines had pride in their construction.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Ruling from Palermo, Barbarossa's highly cultured but brutal grandson Frederick II (1194 1250) was a prototype for the future Renaissance prince.
The citizens of Palermo feared the rule of Frederick II.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Then Red turned fiercely upon his companion.

Here is a hypothesis:
Red turned on his companion.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: And after that defeat at Glorieta, the retreat to Texas was pure hell with the fires roaring.

Sentence 2: Nobody wanted to run all the way to Texas.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
But it was the adventure of Garibaldi's Red Shirts that imposed the unification of the peninsula in 1860.

Does it follow that "Garibaldi's Red Shirts divided the peninsula."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "3 billion for the delivery function alone.", can we conclude that "The delivery function costs three billion by itself."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes