IN: This is an email
Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing for the week of 6/11/01. Please note that United States Gypsum Company was added to "No Trades" and Proliance Energy is now at "ENA Purchases Only". If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report. To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002. For other questions, please contact Jason R. Williams at x5-3923, Russell Diamond at x5-7095, or Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.

What is the subject?

OUT: REVISED: Credit Watch List--Week of 6/11/01

IN: This is an email
You had asked for my input on a response to a letter you received from Tom Donahue regarding increasing Enron's contribution to the US Chamber to $100,000. I have been giving the Chamber a bit of a hard time lately and wanted you to know why. I have been in touch with both Tom and his staff over the last year. Donahue has done a very good job raising money and getting his membership rolls up, both in terms of membership and dollar contribution per member. My reservation about the Chamber is that they won't take a stand on something which is in the best interests of the vast majority of their membership if it will alienate a vocal few. Electric restructuring was a key example of this. There was no doubt where they should have been on the issue, but instead of embracing retail open access legislation at the federal level they decided to have a "process". Naturally, all the utilities volunteered to participate in the process and outnumbered the nonutility members when it came time to vote. The vote supported wholesale, but not retail, reform (with heavy emphasis on ensuring stranded cost recovery). Afterwards, the federal debate shifted solely to wholesale legislation (though this is not exclusively the Chamber's fault). Unfortunately, Tom's forceful and competitive approach when it comes to raising his membership rolls leaves him unwilling to do the right thing if a few members will be upset. For Enron it's a bit like paying $100,000 for a veto right. The only things the organization pushes for are the things everyone agrees on in the business community -- eg China PNTR and lower

What is the subject?

OUT: US Chamber

IN: This is an email
Last week you were sent an EWS Human Resources survey. Your input is very valuable to us. Please take a moment to complete this survey by Friday, June 15th. Please direct any replies to "EWS Human Resources" Please click on the link below. Experiencing technical problems? If this link does not automatically launch the questionnaire: 1. Launch by copying the link into your browser, or 2. If you continue to have technical difficulties, please send an email message to confirmit@enron.com 3. Please do not forward this link to anyone else, as it is unique for each respondent. Thank you

What is the subject?

OUT:
EWS Client Satisfaction Survey - Reminder