Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Do you own a shotgun? Excellent. Take it out. Load it with one round, any shot will do. Now point it square at your TV. Release the safety. Pull the trigger.

Now doesn't that feel better?
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: I'm tired of reading from various prominent state leaders, not the legislators, that we need "new revenue." OK, Fran, what new revenue? You've served in plenty of high caliber appointed position inside and outside of Alaska, surely you can do better than beat around the bush. The only new revenue that's been kicked around in op-eds is taxes: Tax the PFD, income tax, education head tax ranging from $100-$500 depending on one's income, additional fuel tax, marijuana tax, more cigarette tax, and a statewide sales tax. No on new revenue taxes until the Legislature cuts $50 million from its own budget, and repeals SB21 tax credits.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Hot doesn't necessarily mean there is a fire hazard. Conditions in the forest have to be very dry, and that wasn't the case back in the 70's and 80's. Then it was hot but the forests were still wet. The trees weren't dried out. So while the weather may be similar, the climate can still be different and its the changing climate leading to increased fire hazard.
[EX A]:
No