Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Oh wow Peter DeFazio got his name on something now he should move on to New Zealand. This editor is touting saving $24 million. For a bunch of bureaucrats that have been doing lunch meetings for several years that they even voted on any thing is amazing. I would be interested to see the over head of this committee. In fact the editor is totally wrong if the interest is saving money. The maybe 6-8 million not going to fund draft registration after committee costs will be spent on some thing else. Like maybe send it to ltd for their next round of monument building and legacy padding emx. Draft registration just might serve another purpose. Like about the only thing left that demonstrates to 18 year olds they may be called on to defend what freedoms we have left in this country. Just the opposite of what is taught in schools.

Answer: No

Question: Ian - actually the third reading clarified for me that the only folks winning in this are the attorneys and the Governor. We will end in the weeds looking for who said whom could ask for what long before any valid action, like a judge recusing himself or the 'right' person having authority, is fully addressed.

Answer: Yes

Question: I echo christa_m's remark below - I am most interested in the answer to #7. With due respect to Mr. Jaquiss, I am perplexed about the placement of this item so far down the list. I also can't fathom these individuals as "protesters" - that describes peaceful marchers objecting to violent deaths at the hands of police officers, not an armed militia.

These armed domestic terrorists were allowed to overtake control of land protected by our national government for the safety of our wildlife without consequence for 3 weeks; a number of them still remain unfettered in their unlawful, threatening behavior. While in no way do I wish official intervention had led to any loss of life, I most assuredly have far more concern for their being held accountable than I do for the details of their arrest. Is it not obvious why they'd be transferred to Portland? Does it matter if they were drawn away from the refuge under false pretense? I do not understand the tone or intention of this piece.

Answer:
No