Problem: Given the question: Question: "Why was a binding precedent not possible at the time of the Constitution?" Context: "As federal judge Alex Kozinski has pointed out, binding precedent as we know it today simply did not exist at the time the Constitution was framed. Judicial decisions were not consistently, accurately, and faithfully reported on both sides of the Atlantic (reporters often simply rewrote or failed to publish decisions which they disliked), and the United Kingdom lacked a coherent court hierarchy prior to the end of the 19th century. Furthermore, English judges in the eighteenth century subscribed to now-obsolete natural law theories of law, by which law was believed to have an existence independent of what individual judges said. Judges saw themselves as merely declaring the law which had always theoretically existed, and not as making the law. Therefore, a judge could reject another judge's opinion as simply an incorrect statement of the law, in the way that scientists regularly reject each other's conclusions as incorrect statements of the laws of science." Answer:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The answer is:
United Kingdom lacked a coherent court hierarchy

Problem: Given the question: Question: "Baptists believe in what liberty of association?" Context: "Baptists, like other Christians, are defined by doctrinesome of it common to all orthodox and evangelical groups and a portion of it distinctive to Baptists. Through the years, different Baptist groups have issued confessions of faithwithout considering them to be creedsto express their particular doctrinal distinctions in comparison to other Christians as well as in comparison to other Baptists. Most Baptists are evangelical in doctrine, but Baptist beliefs can vary due to the congregational governance system that gives autonomy to individual local Baptist churches. Historically, Baptists have played a key role in encouraging religious freedom and separation of church and state." Answer:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The answer is:
religious freedom

Problem: Given the question: Question: "Russian and Polish cultures are not?" Context: "In 2013 a lot of media coverage was given to unclassified NSA's study in Cryptologic Spectrum that concluded that Tito did not speak the language as a native, and had features of other Slavic languages (Russian and Polish). The hypothesis that "a non-Yugoslav, perhaps a Russian or a Pole" assumed Tito's identity was included. The report also notes Draza Mihailovic's impressions of Tito's Russian origins." Answer:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The answer is:
Yugoslav