In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Ya know, I gotta say, I don't find it much comfort to hear that "well, other denominations are losing adherents too." (As bad as the "well, other people abuse children too" with the implication that the hierarchy is somehow excused from the abuse and cover-up.) The overall drift away from Catholicism and other Christian denominations suggests a bigger overall problem. Christianity began and grew in the midst of a decadent secular Roman society, so frankly, it's not society's fault. I can't help thinking too many supposed Christian leaders have become too wrapped up in trying to dominate society with secular power rather than leading by spiritual example.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: I was driving on Farrington Hwy in Waianae the other day and there was this guy wearing his shorts half way down his buttocks. No skivies on, and from the front you could see his pubes...! I don't think HPD ever approached him to let him know that he was a distraction...😳

Answer: Sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: You are a man. It is science. Remember that? If you have a penis you are a man. If you don't, you're a woman. It is basic biology. Believing you're anything else is a mental delusion. Society used to know these basic truths. Now liberals don't. Yet they think they're the 'science' party.

Answer:
Sexual-explicit