In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.

Q: Context: To assess how different imputation methods used to account for missing variance data in primary studies influence tests of heterogeneity and pooled results from a meta-analysis with continuous outcomes.', 'Point and variance estimates for changes in serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were variably reported among 48 primary longitudinal studies of living kidney donors (71%-78% of point estimates were reported, 8%-13% of variance data were reported). We compared the results of meta-analysis, which either were restricted to available data or used four methods to impute missing variance data. These methods used reported P-values, reported nonparametric summaries, results from other similar studies using multiple imputation, or results from estimated correlation coefficients.', 'Significant heterogeneity was present in all four outcomes regardless of the imputation methods applied. The random effects point estimates and 95% confidence intervals varied little across imputation methods, and the differences were not clinically significant.\Question: Do imputing variance estimates alter the conclusions of a meta-analysis with continuous outcomes : a case study of changes in renal function after living kidney donation?

A: Different methods to impute the variance data in the primary studies did not alter the conclusions from this meta-analysis of continuous outcomes. Such reproducibility increases confidence in the results. However, as with most meta-analyses, there was no gold standard of truth, and results must be interpreted judiciously. The generalization of these findings to other meta-analyses, which differ in outcomes, missing data, or between-study heterogeneity, requires further consideration.
****
Q: Context: Endotoxin, when delivered shortly before or during mechanical ventilation, increases susceptibility to ventilation-associated lung injury. However, it is unclear whether increased susceptibility to ventilator-associated lung injury is still present after clinical recovery from a transient endotoxin challenge.', 'Anesthetized rats were submitted to a 4-h period of mechanical ventilation with low (8 ml/kg) or high (24, 27, or 30 ml/kg) tidal volumes (VTs) 24 h after transient illness had been provoked by a single nonlethal intravenous injection of Escherichia coli endotoxin. Control animals were injected with phosphate-buffered saline and underwent the same protocol.', 'At 24 h, endotoxin-treated nonventilated animals showed no symptoms of clinical illness, and oxygenation was comparable with that of controls, but lung neutrophil counts were increased. Compared with controls, mechanical ventilation with high VT induced a stronger pulmonary inflammatory response and more severe lung injury in endotoxin-treated animals, as indicated by impaired oxygenation, increased lung wet-to-dry weight ratio, and increased levels of protein, neutrophils, and cytokines in lung lavage fluid. In addition, the highest VT resulted in increased mortality in endotoxin-treated animals. Low VT after endotoxin treatment did not cause functional pulmonary impairment but induced an inflammatory response.\Question: Does increased susceptibility to ventilator-associated lung injury persist after clinical recovery from experimental endotoxemia?

A: In this animal model, a 24-h delay after a single systemic injection of endotoxin resulted in clinical recovery and preserved pulmonary function but did not prevent increased susceptibility to ventilator-associated lung injury provoked by high VT. Residual pulmonary inflammation and neutrophilic infiltration at initiation of mechanical ventilation probably contribute to these findings.
****
Q: Context: Free fat grafts have an unpredictable survival rate, which may be dependent on host bed vascularity. Therefore, the authors hypothesized that the presence of growth factors in platelet-rich plasma (PRP), may enhance free fat graft survival.', 'Free fat grafts and autologous PRP were harvested from a healthy female and processed using the Coleman technique and the Medtronic Magellan system respectively. The experiment comprised two groups of 12 nude mice each with injection of free fat grafts into the scalp. The experimental group comprised the combination of 0.8 ml of free fat graft and 0.2 ml of PRP. The control group comprised the combination of 0.8 ml of free fat graft and 0.2 ml of normal saline. The mice were euthanized after 16 weeks and the fat grafts explanted and measured for weight and volume. Histology was performed with Oil Red O stain. Statistical analysis of the weight and volume in between groups was performed using the independent samples T-test (SPSS v11). The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the ranking of six histological parameters between the two groups.', 'The mean weight and volume for the experimental arm were 0.503 g and 0.545 ml respectively. The mean weight and volume for the control arm were 0.500 g and 0.541 ml respectively. The weight, volume and histological parameters between the two groups were not statistically significant. A mouse from each group died of unknown causes.\Question: Does platelet-rich plasma have no effect on increasing free fat graft survival in the nude mouse?

A:
PRP did not enhance free fat graft survival in the nude mouse.
****