Question:
Based on the premise "A thunderous roar grew in the night; metal screeching and scratching.", can we conclude that "It was a calm and silent evening. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Major Buddhist temples, profiting from the suppression of Christianity during the 17th century, were established by Chinese Zen monks and designed in the style of the late Ming Dynasty.

Sentence B: During the 17th century, very few people worshiped the Christian God.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: yeah it seems that the the policies of pretty much anywhere not just in Central America that US has now is is you know more action than just words than just rhetoric but you know i we we back up what we say what we say with actions
The policies of both the US and Central America are to back up your words with actions.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
so you guys are well aware of the problems with the Japanese markets and everything else

Here is a hypothesis:
You guys know about the issues with the Japanese markets?

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Don Lorenzo pointed a pistol skyward.

Sentence 2: Don Lorenzo has his pistol at home.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"My mind was still quite jumbled."
Hypothesis: My mind was crystal clear.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no