In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: Right, a man who chooses to have sex with a women who has passed out is not responsible. As a matter of fact, it should be a man's right.
what kind of person are you?
Yes drinking to excess is not good for anyone. Sexual assault is a vicious crime.
Are you suggesting this woman asked to be assaulted? The cabbie assaulted her..she did nothing to deserve it.
Surely even you know the difference. If not, perhaps go to a rape crisis centre or buy a book...learning is quite powerful.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: Jill: Just another note.....the rather infamous incident you reference involved a "he said, she said" sexual assault?/consensual sex? incident involving a young lady and three (now ex-) basketball players. We could spend hours debating the incident. However, in all fairness, you should refer to "allegedly GANG RAPED". I spoke out at the time, and will repeat, the Administation's actions were deplorable and violated every standard for patient/therapist confidentiality. I very much agree that the U of O has a very self-serving "flexible" standard of privacy. It's cost them a great deal of money in the past and will cost them a great deal more unless they develop and honor a decent standard of privacy. regards, Gary Crum

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: How come no Wikileaks of Republican emails? Certainly, they would hotter with the likes of Ann Coulter in the mix; make for more sizzling read!
Sad thing are the "Catholic" lap dogs for Trump: Guiliani, Christies, Hannity, O'Reilly, KA Conway, etc. (Bloggers, add to the list; they are legion).
The list competes with Trump's distortions, lies, personal attacks, etc.

How RCs can be in his toxic company & maintain their Catholic virginity is difficult to comprehend.

I guess they feel they can get this in during the Year of Mercy & be absolved.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit