In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Sigh ... sadly evoking a some commenters here on the R-G site who define every new Donald Trump revelation as simply losers whining about the results of the last election, I have to say, as the feces continues to move into the fan with the power and consistency of a conveyor belt, that (damn) if ever there was an agenda this country needed, it was the politics of Bernie Sanders. Reform systems skewed for the wealthiest 1%, reform the worst health care system in the developed nations, reform the economics of higher education, and do what we can to halt the human damage to our planet. Hindsight and all that; and (damn) I didn't even vote for him in the primary.
[A]: Obscene

[Q]: Comment: Remember the modern left and the neo-cons don't do logic. It is all about how they feel.

-

Doug Saunder and Robyn Doolittle are the same as the anti-vaxxer's. They are pushing theories that have been disproven decades ago.
[A]: Non-obscene

[Q]: Comment: The junior Trudeau always seems to be in over his head with his foot in his mouth. The unqualified, unprepared, never ready drama supply teacher is a sad case.
[A]:
Non-obscene