In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: This article is somewhere between deceptive and fraudulent.
1)The first step in suing the state or any other entity is the FILING of the COMPLAINT and SERVING the defendant the COMPLAINT. The state says they have not been served the complaint. Therefore at this time no complaint has been filed.
The truth is, at best, is that the plaintiff is PREPARING to sue the state and I hardly find this to be any way news worthy! Seriously WTF?

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: Luckily Trump will shut this idiot up once and for all.
Lord knows Junior can't.
Platitudes, climate change rhetoric along with a few epithets won't take out your enemy.
Maybe Junior could carbon tax kim juck muck to oblivion like he is doing to us.

Saturday Night Live needs an MC - kim juck muck would do fine

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: Hahahaha I'll make sure to pay attention to the gender of he director. God forbid if the film stinks and I say so I'll be labelled a misogynist. The whole concept of gender equality is an utter joke. Man or woman if you excel at your career good on you. If you suck you suck. Move on and suck it up

Answer:
Sexual-explicit