Q: I thought it may be helpful to review my notes on information needed to respond to the Botchlett/Straub charges (although I know you have notes on the information needed). We need: 1. The name, title, description of job function (e.g. had crude oil trading portfolio) and ages of all persons reporting directly to Wade Doshier and John Nowlan for the period 1/1/99 to 6/1/01 and what happened to them in the organization (e.g. still there, transferred, terminated) including dates. For each person if they had established P&L goals in each year what they were and how well they did against the goal. 2. The P&L for Botchlett on his own books (as opposed to his team result) for both 1999 and 2000. 3. The organization charts for the group managed by Doshier then Shankman back to 1995 if available. 4. Data on Straub's actual presence in the building from security. ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++ The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. Thank You
Propose a subject line
A: Botchlett/Straub
IN: Sara and Marie, Mike Kustra was in to meet Gary for Morgan Stanley today. Mike has been told that the only thing outstanding is the place of jusidiction and Chicago has been agreed to as the compromise. Please let me know if this agrees with your view. Thanks. Sheila

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Morgan Stanley futures
IN: This is an email
John, I previously asked you to quantify the global size of your business (in Billions) and you sent me a voice mail on it. I have misplaced that note and don't remember the global size for the presentation. Please re-provide as a return email. Sorry for the inconvenience. Mike

What is the subject?

OUT: Crude and product market size
QUESTION: Kay, Here is the draft form of the contract I spoke to you about on Friday. I've also sent this to the contract administrative group. If this draft is ok to use, I believe the only thing we have to add to this is the 'PSA'. We could consider this document as our 'Scope of Work' or 'Statement of Work'. I'll be out of the office on Monday, however you can reach me by cell, 713-516-7582 or tex pager 888-662-8505. Thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Draft Contract for Plant Protection Service Houston to New Orleans (Jode Corp)
The transfer of your securities and mutual funds is in process. There are a few Canadian items that will not transfer. You mentioned that you would like to sell the Canadian securities and transfer the cash. Can you please call Dale Onrait at 250-712-2195 and have him liquidate the Canadian positions and tell him you would like the proceeds and the Candian cash to be converted to US dollars and transfered to RBC Dain Rauscher. This instruction must come from you. If you have any questions, please give me a call.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Canadian Transfer
I am finalizing the negotiation of the ISDA Master Agreement with SITA. You will recall that this is an ECTRIC; master NOT ENA. SITA has (1) requested evidence of EEFT's ability to sign for ECTRIC and (2) confirmation that "EEFT is signing on the basis of their authority under the investment services directive". Would you please provide directly to SITA's lawyers as follows: Susan Hopkinson and Sharon Lewis at Lovells in Paris: susan.hopkinson@lovells.com
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
SITA master agreement with ECTRIC