input question: Unfortunately, no positive proof has ever corroborated the claim. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There has been evidence against the claim."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "that's right that's right well it's been enjoyable talking with you", can we conclude that "I'm afraid I really didn't enjoy our talk."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: you know when you develop your imagination that can take you into a lot of other areas because you've developed uh your your your mind in in seeing things you know even if it's your own set way

Sentence B: Your imagination can take you lots of places because you can see things others can't.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: NOECs and LOECs are determined by hypothesis testing (Dunnett's Test, a t test with the Bonferroni adjustment, Steel's Many-One Rank Test, or the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test with Bonferroni adjustment), whereas LCs, ICs, and ECs are determined by point estimation techniques (Probit Analysis, the Spearman-Karber Method, the Trimmed Spearman-Karber Method, the Graphical Method or Linear Interpolation Method).
Hypothesis testing is how LOECs are found.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Finkelstein is not breaking new ground here.

Here is a hypothesis:
Finkelstein is breaking new ground here.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
Others may pause to wonder why Connecticut--and 19 other states--needs an antitrust policy separate from that of the United States.

Does it follow that "Many wonder why 20 states need a different antitrust policy than the one written by the United States."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes