Premise:
"Well, go on and tell me if you've got so much to say."
Hypothesis: Please don't say anything, even if you've got a lot to say.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: Again, as in the case of wine sales, states have taxing jurisdiction over transactions only if the seller has sufficient physical presence in the state. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Seller do not always have sufficient physical presence in a state."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "We will give you short shrift.", can we conclude that "We will allow you a short period with the priest."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: and well you know the auto budget car payment sucks a hell of a lot of it dry

Sentence B: Thankfully that will end in two years.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Upon acceptance of the award, Hankinson said, This award means so much to me.
Hankinson was thrilled to have won the award.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
The creation of the Department of Homeland Security will be one of the largest reorganizations ever undertaken and the difficulty of this task should not be underestimated.

Here is a hypothesis:
The creation of the Department of Homeland National Security should be a straightforward reorganization for everyone involved.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no