IN: Veronica Aquila did a great job of cleaning our house when we first moved back to the neighborhood, then she got called back to Mexico. She's back in town ready to go to work, but we have someone we're very satisfied with. You can reach her at 713.426.3094. Hilary (Mr.) Hilary Smith 712 Bomar St.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: *EMCA* House cleaner available
IN: This is an email
Here's what I have on the open issues/ to do list: Resolve shipping/delivery obligations in accordance with option agreement; conform contract Confirm pricing Add schedule of delivery dates Finalize assignment language (I sent Mike an email with a question about their request) Agree on effective date: suggest signing date be whatever it is (hope for tomorrow) with effective date being the last day of last option Need estimated price per month to store (a request from Finance for budget purposes) Verify sales tax exemption with WestLB (doesn't require ABB involvement, nor does it need to be done before contract is signed) Need assignment of option (Finance to provide - no ABB action, I'll follow up) Kathy: do you have anything to add? Are there any technical details left to resolve? Ben, anything to add? I'll send a cleaned up version to Mike tomorrow am. Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: ABB to do list
QUESTION: In September I sent you all a summary of the facts at issue in the above-referenced lawsuit. Since that time, several developments have occurred. First, the trial date was moved from October 11, 2001 to November 13, 2001. We have no reason to believe that we will not go to trial on the 13th. We expect the trial to last from 10 days to 2 weeks. Judge Ira Gammerman will try the case. There is no jury. The second development deals with the proposed summary judgment motions mentioned in my last e-mail. Summary judgments on liability and damages have been filed and the plaintiffs have responded. We have filed replies to their opposition papers. In addition, the plaintiffs filed a cross-motion for summary judgment as to liability. We filed opposition papers to this motion. New York practice differs somewhat from Texas practice to the extent that we have no firm date for a hearing on these motions. Although we are attempting to get a hearing before the trial date, the judge has complete discretion as to whether to hear the parties' motions for summary judgment before the start of trial. The third development relates to the plaintiffs' theory of the case. It seems clear from the papers filed in response to our motions for summary judgment that the plaintiffs are fine-tuning their case to focus on the contracts' size distribution requirement arguing that the type of coal supplied by Enron, whether crushed or not, could never meet the contracts' size distribution requirement. The plaintiffs make this argument in simple terms and, when argued as such, it has some appeal. However, it is Enron's position that the contracts' language is ambiguous and the better (and much more complicated) approach advanced by the defendants is that the subject coal could and would have met the size distribution requirements. Issues of whether the contracts are installment contracts also play heavily in this analysis. Fourth, since the last e-mail on this matter, we have learned that the plaintiffs are seeking $71 million in damages from Enron. This is approximately half of the amount of the contracts' damage cap. Lastly, we finally received a response from the plaintiffs to the settlement proposal we made in June. The plaintiffs have offered to resolve this matter for a cash payment by Enron of $45 million. In the alternative, the plaintiffs have proposed a business alternative which is currently being investigated. Additionally, there is some discussion of mediation in the limited time remaining before trial. Should you have any questions about this case or should you need any further information, please call me.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Sempra v. Enron
Lou, Per your request here are the appropriate coding strings for you and those that you would like to have access for aggregating costs associated with perfecting the ROW and associated professional costs. I hope this is what you are looking for, if I can be of further assistance please advise. Tim Project Definition C.015000 - Northern Natural Gas Coding Information Cost Element WBS Element Description 52501500 C.015000.03.09.50.01 Banking - Outside Services 52507000 C.015000.03.09.50.02 Legal - Outside Services 52507700 C.015000.03.09.50.03 Accounting - Outside Services 52508000 C.015000.03.09.50.04 ROW - Outside Services 52501500 C.015000.03.09.51 Bank Advisory Fees 52004500 C.015000.03.09.52 Other General Expenses Project Definition C.015001 - Transwestern Pipeline Coding Information Cost Element WBS Element Description 52501500 C.015001.03.09.50.01 Banking - Outside Services 52507000 C.015001.03.09.50.02 Legal - Outside Services 52507700 C.015001.03.09.50.03 Accounting - Outside Services 52508000 C.015001.03.09.50.04 ROW - Outside Services 52501500 C.015001.03.09.51 Bank Advisory Fees 52004500 C.015001.03.09.52 Other General Expenses
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Coding Structure for Revolver Costs
Due to recent concerns about the lack of security over wireless networks, all wireless hubs will be disconnected from the Enron network on Tuesday, 3/26. Enron Network Services will continue to investigate alternative wireless security methods. If you have any questions concerning this action please, please contact Mary Vollmer @ ext. 33381.
Answer: Decommission Wireless Hubs
Q: Gerald, As discussed yesterday, we are targeting to deliver an LOI to Oakhill Pipeline this Thursday morning. Please review the attached LOI Draft and provide any comments. Items in red are still being worked and will be confirmed by tomorrow afternoon. Please contact me with any questions. Thanks, Lisa Druzbik
Propose a subject line
A:
Oakhill Compression Project - LOI