In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Example input: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Example output: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Example explanation: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.
Q: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Level Playing Field in Trade
Agreements Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. INELIGIBILITY FOR EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION BY CONGRESS OF
CERTAIN TRADE AGREEMENTS.

(a) In General.--No trade agreement with a country or implementing
bill with respect to a trade agreement may receive expedited
consideration by Congress under any provision of law, including any
limitation on amendments or debate in either the Senate or the House of
Representatives (other than under rule XXII of the Standing Rules of
the Senate, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act)
unless the agreement--
(1) includes binding and enforceable requirements that all
producers of merchandise exported to the United States from
that country pay adequate wages and maintain sustainable
production methods; and
(2) provides that, for purposes of merchandise from that
country, the application of antidumping duty laws under
subtitle B of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1673 et seq.) shall be modified as provided under subsection
(b).
(b) Adjustment of Normal Value To Include the Cost of Paying
Adequate Wages and Maintaining Sustainable Production Methods.--
(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (3), in
determining the price of covered merchandise under subsection
(a)(1)(B) of section 773 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1677b) for purposes of determining the normal value of the
covered merchandise under that section, the administering
authority shall increase the price by the difference, if any,
between--
(A) the actual cost of producing the covered
merchandise; and
(B) the estimated cost of producing the covered
merchandise if the producer paid its employees adequate
wages and maintained sustainable production methods.
(2) Demonstration of injury.--An interested party described
in subparagraph (C), (D), (E), (F), or (G) of section 771(9) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677(9)) that files a
petition under section 732(b)(1) of that Act (19 U.S.C.
1673a(b)(1)) with respect to covered merchandise that relies on
calculations of normal value made under this subsection shall
be presumed to demonstrate that the party is materially injured
or threatened with material injury by reason of imports of the
covered merchandise unless--
(A) the country from which the covered merchandise
is exported is covered by a precertification issued
under paragraph (3)(A)(ii); or
(B) the estimated cost of producing the covered
merchandise under paragraph (1)(B) is equal to or
greater than the cost of producing the merchandise in
the country in which the interested party is located.
(3) Precertification.--
(A) In general.--
(i) Exporter- or producer-specific
precertification.--If an exporter or producer
of covered merchandise demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the administering authority
that all such merchandise, including
significant components or ingredients of the
covered merchandise, was or will be produced
under conditions under which all employees
receive adequate wages or sustainable
production methods are maintained, the
administering authority shall issue to that
exporter or producer, upon request, a
precertification with respect to wages,
production methods, or both, that covers all
covered merchandise by that exporter or
producer.
(ii) Country precertification.--The
administering authority may issue a
precertification for all covered merchandise
imported from a country if the government of
that country maintains and enforces laws
requiring all producers of such merchandise in
that country to pay its employees adequate
wages and to maintain sustainable production
methods.
(B) Safe harbor.--
(i) In general.--If the administering
authority has issued a precertification under
subparagraph (A), covered merchandise to which
the precertification applies shall not be
subject to an antidumping duty solely because a
petition filed under section 732(b)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673a(b)(1)) with
respect to the covered merchandise alleges that
the covered merchandise was not produced under
conditions under which all employees receive
adequate wages and sustainable production
methods are maintained.
(ii) Challenging precertification.--An
interested party described in subparagraph (C),
(D), (E), (F), or (G) of section 771(9) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677(9)) that
files a petition under section 732(b)(1) of
that Act (19 U.S.C. 1673a(b)(1)) with respect
to covered merchandise covered by a
precertification issued under subparagraph (A)
bears the burden of proving that the covered
merchandise was not produced under conditions
under which all employees receive adequate
wages, sustainable production methods are
maintained, or both, depending on the scope of
the precertification.
(C) Use of third-party standards.--
(i) In general.--The administering
authority, the Secretary of Labor, and the
Administrator of the Environmental Protection
Agency may jointly establish procedures
pursuant to which obtaining certification from
an organization described in clause (ii) may
demonstrate the eligibility of an exporter or
producer for a precertification under
subparagraph (A)(i) or the eligibility of a
country for a precertification under
subparagraph (A)(ii).
(ii) Organization described.--An
organization described in this clause is an
independent third-party organization that sets
standards with respect to adequate wages or
sustainable production methods.
(D) Guidance on compliance.--Not later than one
year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
administering authority shall publish in the Federal
Register guidance with respect to how persons producing
covered merchandise for exportation to the United
States or seeking to import covered merchandise into
the United States may obtain a precertification under
subparagraph (A).
(c) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Adequate wages.--The term ''adequate wages''--
(A) means compensation for a regular work week that
is sufficient to meet the basic needs of the employee
and any dependents of the employee, including providing
reasonable discretionary income; and
(B) includes, at a minimum--
(i) the payment of the higher of the
minimum wage or the appropriate prevailing
wage;
(ii) compliance with all legal requirements
relating to wages (including freedom of
association relating to the bargaining relating
to wages and related matters); and
(iii) the provision of such benefits as are
required by law or contract.
(2) Administering authority.--The term ''administering
authority'' has the meaning given that term in section 771(1)
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677(1)).
(3) Covered merchandise.--The term ''covered merchandise''
means merchandise imported into the United States from a
country described in subsection (a).
(4) Sustainable production methods.--The term ''sustainable
production methods''--
(A) means the application of technologies and
methods that are necessary to provide for workplace
safety, toxic waste control, control of discharge of
pollutants to air, water, and land, and the reasonable
conservation of energy and natural resources, taking
into account local standards and conditions; and
(B) includes, at a minimum, the use of technologies
and methods that would be required for similar
production facilities in the United States.
A:
Level Playing Field in Trade Agreements Act of 2015 No trade agreement with a country, or implementing bill for one, may receive expedited consideration by Congress under any provision of law, including any limitation on amendments or debate in either the Senate (except under rule XXII of the Standing Rules) or the House of Representatives unless the agreement: includes binding and enforceable requirements that all producers of merchandise exported to the United States from that country pay adequate wages and maintain sustainable production methods; and provides that, for purposes of such merchandise, the application of antidumping duty laws under the Tariff Act of 1930 shall be modified according to this Act. The administering authority, in determining the normal price of covered merchandise and whether it is or is likely to be sold at less than fair value, must increase the price by the difference, if any, between the actual cost of producing the merchandise and the estimated cost of producing it if the producer paid its employees adequate wages and maintained sustainable production methods. Certain interested parties that petition for an antidumping proceeding with respect to covered merchandise relying on calculations of normal value under this Act shall be presumed to demonstrate that they are materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports of the covered merchandise unless: the country from which the covered merchandise is exported is covered by a precertification, or the estimated cost of producing the covered merchandise is equal to or greater than the cost of producing it in the country in which the interested party is located. The administering authority shall issue a precertification with respect to wages, production methods, or both, for merchandise of a requesting exporter or producer that demonstrates to the administering authority's satisfaction that all such merchandise, including significant components or ingredients, was or will be produced under conditions under which all employees receive adequate wages or sustainable production methods are maintained. The administering authority shall also issue a precertification for all merchandise imported from a country if that country's government maintains and enforces laws requiring all producers of such merchandise in that country to pay its employees adequate wages and to maintain sustainable production methods. The administering authority, the Secretary of Labor, and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency may jointly establish procedures pursuant to which obtaining certification from an independent third-party standards-setting organization may demonstrate eligibility for a precertification.