Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
Example: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Output: Sexual-explicit
This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.

New input case for you: Comment: Actually how you are portrayed is a reflection of what you write in these comments.

In one comment you are clamoring for people to spoon feed you information and provide basic investor education. The very kind of stuff you would expect a trader to be well versed in or at least capable of finding for themselves. Probably 99% of your questions could be resolved if you took literally 5 minutes (or less) to look up using Google. But then oddly enough your making comments raving about being a successful trader with consistent high double digit returns for the past 15 years in an apparent attempt to ridicule those that follow a dividend based strategy (based on your frequency of being the first and most prolific to comment on all things dividend related).

As I said in another comment - I don't know whether you are simply a troll or completely delusional but for your sake I sincerely hope it is the former.
Output:
Non-sexual-explicit