You will be given a review about a book, an item, a place or a movie. After that, a question is given that you should answer using a certain span of the review. Your answer should be from the review itself and should not contain extra words, and should not be a combination of different spans. If there's no direct answer to the question, answer with a part of the text that is the most relevant to the question. See the examples for clarification.

review: "Thank You for Smoking" was an entertaining movie. I enjoyed the portrayal of corporate shenanigans and its satire of Hollywood types. The acting was good and all players did their jobs well but I was a bit put off by the smirking 'we're so smart and hip attitude' of the movie. A bit of humbleness is appealing you know. Some say the subject matter in this film i.e. to smoke or not to smoke is equally weighed. I personally didn't feel that way at all. I felt the overall tone for the movie was geared toward smoking. Personally, I don't smoke but I don't mind that this film is for smoking. What I liked about the film is that it kept my brain going. And like I said majority of this film is predictable, but you do begin to question how free the rights of the American Public are? Should smoking be banned or should smokers have their rights too? Like stated in the film people know smoking is bad yet they still do it. Why? The movie puts a nice spin on the importance of information and looking at things from alternative views.It's nice to see Aaron Eckhart play a good solid role for once. I think his performance in this film was excellent and extremely believable. I think after this role we will be seeing him in more movies. William H. Macy also stars and shines yet again. Macy is one of the best actors in Hollywood who for years still never got the appreciation he deserves. Also Katie Holmes does a decent job although her character is extremely predictable. I personally think Holmes does a good job at playing bad girl roles like her role here and in "The Gift". The reason I think that is because she looks so innocent so when she comes out saying something like "I want to f*** you, when I watch you on TV" it seems out of the ordinary for her. This is also probably another reason why Tom Cruise loves her; she's probably a very bad girl outside the public eye.Even though this is Jason Reitman's first feature film he is one to keep an eye on. I feel as the time goes on he will become a very big director just like his father. Being that "Smoking" is his first film, I think he has already hit a home run. I think the guy has talent and as long as he keeps making good movies he will be just as big as his dad is someday.I like the message behind "Thank You For Smoking" but not the overall subject matter of the film. This movie provides its audience with fine acting, a good script and some nice directing. The film's idea also keeps its audience thinking. It's a good movie to watch with someone and then have a nice long talk with about it afterwards. It's a satirical look at the smoking issue although I still feel it tilts more towards one side than the other. But at the end of the day, it's a good independent film which you will be able to enjoy and appreciate.
question: Do you think this act is satisfying?
good

review: Pretty high in sugar, but not all that sweet really (which isn't a great thing), but still has a nice coffee flavor and is a great pick me up. It only has 100 calories so it's also not bad there. I enjoyed it a lot.
question: How good was the stuff in the dishes at the hotel?
It only has 100 calories so it 's also not bad there

review: What the heck did I just watch? This movie is senseless.In a nutshell, the hero does various dirty dance routines (presumably - because we never actually see the dances) in order to distract people so that her friends can steal a series of items in order to escape some sort of mental institution that doubles as a brothel. Got all that?Why don't we see the dances you ask? Because whenever a dance starts our hero goes into a fantasy trance and we are transported into a dream sequence where her and her fellow dancers take on zombie Nazis, dragons, robots, etc. For example, one of the items that they need to steal is a lighter. Therefore, the fantasy sequence involves the squad of women cutting the throat of a baby dragon, ripping out two fire crystals, and then a chase sequence with the mother dragon.I'll admit that the fantasy parts are pretty well done. However, after the first two I found myself asking - "Is this all there is? Do I have to go through this two or three more times?" In that sense, I suppose Sucker Punch is a lot like a vasectomy. The first one is a bit of a surprise, but the second one usually hurts a little more. Party because you know what to expect... partly because... well... it's a vasectomy. Sucker Punch was just like that. The first cut scene was a bit of a surprise, but then you get through it and have to endure the second one. Unfortunately, there are more than two in this case and no warm towel to soften you up! This movie made me want to spend two days sitting on an ice pack.In the end, I just wondered what the point was. This movie was just barely good enough so that I didn't turn it off. That's the only reason it gets two stars instead of one. One star is reserved for absolute trash like GI Joe.You know how you can really tell how bad this movie is? By how much many of the 5 star reviewers spend their time defending it. Uhhhh... If it was five stars, it would speak for itself, right? Apparently not, because many 5 star reviews spend time advising everyone how they "don't get it" etc, etc. Yes, yes, yes... the critics were wrong, the poor reviewers are wrong... blah, blah, blah. You, my 5 star friend, are the only genius to see the magnificence of this film and the rest of us are just inbred and toothless dolts.Now give me a Bud and let me go sit in my recliner.
question: What is your favorite music genre?
various dirty dance routines