Question: Sentence A: and they just wanted me to continue working for them at home doing other things so

Sentence B: They forced me to take an on site position rather than work from home.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: To be sure, intelligence of the kind that might manifest itself in high SAT scores isn't the most important quality in a chief executive.
High SAT scores don't necessarily mean you are going to be a great executive.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Rather than add yet another layer of environmental regulations on top of the existing ones, we believe that S. 556 should eliminate those unnecessary existing requirements.

Here is a hypothesis:
S. 556 had several goals related to parring down regulation on businesses.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: He had trusted Jon to defend Fena Dim with no idea how he would do it.

Sentence 2: He had no idea how Jon would defend Fena Dim.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Especially for 1999, LSC has substantially strengthened the documentation requirements for reporting a case to LSC.

Does it follow that "The strengthening of the documentation took one year."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "yeah uh yeah for ones that you want to see again or you know ones that you really weren't sure if you wanted to see or not you know", can we conclude that "For ones you want to re-watch or ones you were undecided about watching."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes