In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: When you hear that despite the fact that he has economists who know better, the Justice Department's Joel Klein apparently either believes or chooses to claim that this case is about path dependence, you start to wonder. Choices: 1. Joel Klein is lying about the case, and it's obvious why. 2. Joel Klein's claim that the case is about path dependence is fully backed up by his economists. 3. Joel Klein says that this case is about path dependence, even though the economists who work for him know that isn't true.

Answer: 3

Question: Statement: The entrance to the Asclepion is located along a colonnaded street, the Sacred Way, which leads to the medical precinct. Choices: 1. The Sacred way also leads to the local supermarket. 2. The opening to the Asclepion was along the colonnaded street. 3. The colonnaded street was located on Downing street

Answer: 2

Question: Statement: Bill Bradley and George W. Bush ought to know. Choices: 1. Bill Bradley and George W. Bush, given their political credentials, should be familiar with this concept. 2. Bill Bradley is obviously clueless, and nobody would expect him to know much of anything. 3. Both Bill Bradley and George W. Bush should know this.

Answer:
3