Problem: Here is a premise:
i can't imagine just being at home uh although i have a lot of interests and a lot of things i would like to pursue

Here is a hypothesis:
I'd like to work on my sewing if I was at home.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: The FDA reviewed the rule under the Order and concluded that the affect of the final rule would not constitute a taking of private property.

Sentence 2: A taking of private property would not be constituted by the affect of the final rule, as FDA concluded after reviewing the rule under the Order.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Yes, Tommy chimed in.

Does it follow that "Tommy said yes, despite disagreeing. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If BUT WE DOUBT IT, reads a card beside four sizes of woven metal baskets in Restoration Hardware's Georgetown store., can we say that "Georgetown's Restoration Hardware has a card that reads: "BUT WE DOUBT IT.""?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"(Mainstream conservatives sure aren't complaining about the WTO's power to penalize countries that fail to open their telecommunications to foreign investment.)"
Hypothesis: Mainstream conservatives do not see a reason to complain, yet others do.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) reviewed the rule as an economically significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

Sentence 2: The OMB reviewed the rule as an economically significant regulatory action under an executive order.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes