Question:
Based on the premise "The Results Act provides a ready-made statutory mechanism for making this essential connection, engaging Congress in a discussion of how and when management problems will be addressed, and helping to pinpoint additional efforts that may be needed.", can we conclude that "The Results Act provides a mechanism for making the connection."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Resources are maximized when strategically aimed at the areas that need the most improvement.

Sentence B: All of the areas have been improved greatly.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Here they created what most of us envision as the Way of the Samurai : the values, codes, religion, and culture of a warrior caste that would rule Japan for 700 years.
This is where the Samurai laws were first developed.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Editorialists admired and reviled his diabolical shrewdness.

Here is a hypothesis:
The people who write editorials both respected and loathed his shrewdness.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: July 27, it voted 27-11 to pass the first article of impeachment, which focused on obstruction of justice: paying hush money to the Watergate burglars, using the CIA to block the FBI's Watergate investigation, lying to Congress and to investigators, and otherwise covering up crimes.

Sentence 2: The first article of impeachment was voted down.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"That explains everything! "
Hypothesis: Everything is explained.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes