Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
I used that quote because Regan has a folk hero status with many of the conservatives, the real damage done by his administration was the repeal of the anti trust laws which has negatively impacted the balance of wealth ever since, look no further that the " secrecy " clauses between the State and oil companies for an example of the legal monopoly.

Ex Output:
No

Ex Input:
If you have no integrity with the publicly stated beliefs of your religious denomination, that's between you and God. You are a private citizen, believe as you wish.

But, your fellow Conservative Baptist Imago Dei church-member, Jules Bailey, has put the integrity of his beliefs (or, more accurately, lack of integrity, if I'm following his waffling correctly), up for public scrutiny.

People who choose to become paid public figures, must expect to be scrutinized as such. And, it's a bit naive for an Evangelical Christian to run for public office, in Portland, and not expect to be held accountable for the history of his chosen religion, particularly the past 30 years here in Portland (OCA, Oregon Family Council, etc.)

Ex Output:
No

Ex Input:
We could charge all owners and caregivers of dogs that inflict severe or fatal injuries to other dogs or humans with animal neglect. They neglected to keep their dog safe, so the dog and others suffered.

This breed neutral law would ban the owners/handlers from owning or handling dogs. No responsible dog owner would be punished. This proposed law would punish the guilty party, the negligent dog owner.

Ex Output:
Yes