Question: Sentence A: Surely the whole thing is clear as daylight.

Sentence B: The entire thing is obvious.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: The head engineer took off in the one we finished.
The head engineer didn't take off in any of them, he's still here.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Also husk-roasted sweet corn dipped in butter.

Here is a hypothesis:
Husk-roasted sweet corn dipped in butter is very tasty.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Since World War II, annual growth in GDP per capita has averaged roughly 2 percent.

Sentence 2: The GDP per capita had a sharp drop after World War II.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
she's uh uh uh a poodle of a toy poodle a toy poodle and she's

Does it follow that "She's a toy poodle."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "nah so it's sort of an old wife or common folk tales about you know if you're going to have a cat spayed let it go through heat first not true because when they go into heat their uh genetic parts swell up and expand and everything and then once you do take them into surgery it's a little more difficult easier to have them spayed before they even go into heat", can we conclude that "You should always wait for heat to happen then spay."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no