In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Useless sanction. China will support them behind the scene.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene

Ex Input:
Comment: Good riddence to Fidel Mierda ! He murdered 1000s who disagreed politically with him. 1000s more were jailed for decades. 20,000 or more fled his reign, many drowning in funky boats trying to get to Florida. The current leader, his brother Raul, is not much better. Cubans are a wonderful people and deserve much better !!!

Ex Output:
Obscene

Ex Input:
Comment: Reread what happened. The man walked back to his vehicle after asking the question. As for blame, I would point to the constant stream of negativity and anger coming from left leaning publications. This shooter was 'a crazy' as many of the other mass shooters are. He was very deliberate in his actions. Then you state that it does not mean all Dems feel this way which I can agree with, but you then carry on to imply 'all Rs' as you finish. Can you see the double standard in your words.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene