In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Ex Input:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''National Cyber Security Leadership
Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Federal agencies rely on networked computer systems to
deliver critical services and information to the American
people, including operations related to national defense,
emergency services, tax collection, and the payment of
benefits.
(2) There has been an astonishing increase in cyber threats
to government and industry in recent years. The number of cyber
attacks on Federal Government systems in 2001 was 71 percent
greater than the number of such attacks on such systems in
2000.
(3) Cyber attacks can cause irreparable harm in network
systems, including the loss or dissemination of sensitive and
important data. Cyber attacks can also reduce the confidence of
the American people in the integrity and security of the
Internet.
(4) There is mounting evidence to suggest that terrorists
view the Internet as a tool to achieve their goals. Government
investigators found that al Qaeda operatives browsed Internet
sites that offered software describing the digital switches
that control power, water, transport, and communications grids.
(5) The Bush Administration has recognized in its draft
National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace ''the pressing need to
make federal cyberspace security a model for the nation''.
(6) All but a few Federal agencies continue to receive
failing grades for their cyber security programs.
(7) Federal agencies must take significant steps to better
protect themselves against cyber attacks, including--
(A) identifying significant vulnerabilities in
their computer networks and the tools needed to detect
such vulnerabilities;
(B) monitoring for new vulnerabilities in their
computer networks, and assessing risks of cyber
attacks;
(C) testing computers against identified
vulnerabilities; and
(D) ensuring that computers and networks are
adequately protected against such vulnerabilities.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:
(1) Chief information officer.--The term ''Chief
Information Officer'', with respect to an agency, means the
official designated as the Chief Information Officer of the
agency pursuant to section 3506(a)(2) of title 44, United
States Code.
(2) Vulnerability.--The term ''vulnerability'', in the case
of information technology, means an error or defect in coding,
configuration, or installation of such information technology
that increases its susceptibility to a cyber threat.
(3) Other definitions.--Except as otherwise provided in
this section, any term used in this Act which is defined in
section 3502 of title 44, United States Code, shall have the
meaning given that term in such section 3502.

SEC. 4. ELIMINATION OF SIGNIFICANT VULNERABILITIES OF FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY.

(a) In General.--The Chief Information Officer of each agency
shall--
(1) identify the significant vulnerabilities of the
information technology of such agency, including--
(A) vulnerabilities of such classes of information
technology of such agency as the Chief Information
Officer shall designate for purposes of this section;
and
(B) vulnerabilities of the information technology
of such agency as a whole;
(2) establish performance goals for eliminating the
significant vulnerabilities of the information technology of
such agency identified under paragraph (1), with such
performance goals--
(A) to be established utilizing the current state
of the information technology of such agency as a
baseline;
(B) to be stated both for particular classes of
information technology of such agency (as determined
under paragraph (1)(A)) and for the information
technology of such agency as a whole; and
(C) to be expressed as target ratios of
vulnerabilities per information technology;
(3) procure or develop tools to identify and eliminate the
vulnerabilities identified under paragraph (1) in order to
achieve the performance goals established under paragraph (2);
(4) train personnel of such agency in the utilization of
tools procured or developed under paragraph (3);
(5) not less often than once each quarter, test the
information technology of such agency to determine the extent
of the compliance of the information technology with the
performance goals established under paragraph (3); and
(6) to the extent that the information technology of such
agency does not comply with the performance goals established
under paragraph (3), promptly develop and implement a plan to
eliminate significant vulnerabilities in the information
technology in order to achieve compliance with such performance
goals.
(b) Annual Report on Activities.--
(1) Requirement.--The Chief Information Officer of each
agency shall include information on its activities under
subsection (a) in each annual report submitted to the Director
of the Office of Management and Budget under section 3545(e) of
title 44, United States Code (as amended by section 301(b) of
the Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 (title
III of Public Law 107-347)).
(2) Form.--The form of information submitted under
paragraph (1) shall be specified by the Director of the Office
of Management and Budget.
(c) Governmentwide Standards.--
(1) Review by nist.--The Director of the Office of
Management and Budget shall ensure the review by the Director
of the National Institute of Standards and Technology of the
annual reports submitted under subsection (b) in the first year
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) Guidelines.--Not later than 180 days after receiving
annual reports for review under paragraph (1), the Director of
the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall
develop and make available to the Chief Information Officers of
the agencies governmentwide guidelines for use in complying
with subsection (a). The guidelines shall--
(A) identify vulnerabilities of information
technology common to the agencies; and
(B) describe means of eliminating such
vulnerabilities, including the use of checklists
pursuant to section 8(c) of the Cyber Security Research
and Development Act (Public Law 107-305).
(3) Mandatory use.--
(A) Designation of vulnerabilities.--The Director
of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
shall designate as a result of the review under
paragraph (1) any significant vulnerabilities of
information technology of such broad applicability and
severity so as to warrant the mandatory use of the
guidelines developed under paragraph (2) with respect
to such vulnerabilities.
(B) Mandatory use.--The Secretary of Commerce
shall, using the authority available to the Secretary
under section 11331(b) of title 40, United States Code,
mandate the use by the agencies of guidelines developed
under paragraph (2) with respect to vulnerabilities
designated under subparagraph (A).
(C) Use and exception.--Each agency shall use a
standard mandated under subparagraph (B) unless the
Chief Information Officer of such agency determines,
with the concurrence of the Director of the National
Institute of Standards and Technology, that the use of
such guideline by such agency would not increase the
security of the information technology covered by such
standard.

SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be
appropriated to carry out the provisions of this Act amounts as
follows:
(1) For the Department of Commerce for the National
Institute of Standards and Technology, $1,000,000 for fiscal
year 2004 to develop the guidelines required by section 4(c).
(2) For each agency, such sums as may be necessary for such
agency for fiscal years 2004 through 2008 to carry out the
provisions of this Act.
(b) Availability.--The amount authorized to be appropriated by
subsection (a)(1) shall remain available until expended.

SEC. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act shall take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment
of this Act.

Ex Output:
National Cyber Security Leadership Act of 2003 - Requires the Chief Information Officer of each Federal agency to: (1) identify the significant vulnerabilities of the information technology (IT) of such agency; (2) establish performance goals for eliminating such vulnerabilities; (3) procure or develop tools to identify and eliminate those vulnerabilities in order to achieve such performance goals; (4) train personnel in the utilization of those tools; (5) test the agency's IT to determine the extent of its compliance with the performance goals; and (6) develop and implement a plan to eliminate significant vulnerabilities in order to achieve compliance.Requires: (1) each Officer to include information on the agency's activities under this Act in annual reports on the agency's information security program and practices submitted to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB); and (2) the OMB Director to ensure the review of such reports by the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST); (3) the NIST Director to designate, as the result of such review, any significant IT vulnerabilities of such broad applicability and severity so as to warrant the use of government-wide guidelines the Director shall develop and make available to such Officers for complying with this Act; and (4) the Secretary of Commerce to mandate agency use of such guidelines.

Ex Input:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Community-Based Health Care
Retraining Act''.

SEC. 2. HEALTH PROFESSIONS TRAINING DEMONSTRATION PROJECT.

Section 171 of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C.
2916) is amended by adding at the end the following:
''(e) Health Professions Training Demonstration Project.--
''(1) Definitions.--In this subsection:
''(A) Covered community.--The term 'covered
community' means a community or region that--
''(i) has experienced a significant
percentage decline in positions in the
manufacturing or service sectors; and
''(ii) is determined by the Secretary of
Health and Human Services (in consultation with
the medical community) to be an area with a
shortage of health care professionals described
in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (C).
''(B) Covered worker.--The term 'covered worker'
means an individual who--
''(i)(I) has been terminated or laid off,
or who has received a notice of termination or
layoff, from employment in a manufacturing or
service sector;
''(II)(aa) is eligible for or has exhausted
entitlement to unemployment compensation; or
''(bb) has been employed for a duration
sufficient to demonstrate, to the appropriate
entity at a one-stop center referred to in
section 134(c), attachment to the workforce,
but is not eligible for unemployment
compensation due to insufficient earnings or
having performed services for an employer that
were not covered under a State unemployment
compensation law; and
''(III) is unlikely to return to a previous
industry or occupation; or
''(ii)(I) has been terminated or laid off,
or has received a notice of termination or
layoff, from employment in a manufacturing or
service sector as a result of any permanent
closure of, or any substantial layoff at, a
plant, facility, or enterprise; or
''(II) is employed in a manufacturing or
service sector at a facility at which the
employer has made a general announcement that
such facility will close within 180 days.
''(C) Health care professional.--The term 'health
care professional'--
''(i) means an individual who is involved
with--
''(I) the delivery of health care
services, or related services,
pertaining to--
''(aa) the identification,
evaluation, and prevention of
diseases, disorders, or
injuries; or
''(bb) home-based or
community-based long-term care;
''(II) the delivery of dietary and
nutrition services; or
''(III) rehabilitation and health
systems management; and
''(ii) with respect to a covered community
to be served through a grant made under
paragraph (3), includes individuals in health
care professions and jobs for which there is a
shortage in the community, as determined by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services (in
consultation with the medical community),
giving consideration to the amount of training
time required to retrain the covered workers
for the health care professions and jobs.
''(D) Tribal college or university.--The term
'tribal college or university' means--
''(i) a tribally controlled college or
university, as defined in section 2 of the
Tribally Controlled College or University
Assistance Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. 1801);
''(ii) Dine College, authorized in the
Navajo Community College Act (25 U.S.C. 640a et
seq.); and
''(iii) any of the 1994 Institutions, as
defined in section 532 of the Equity in
Educational Land-Grant Status Act of 1994 (7
U.S.C. 301 note).
''(2) Establishment of project.--In accordance with
subsection (b), the Secretary shall establish and carry out a
health professions training demonstration project.
''(3) Grants.--In carrying out the project, the Secretary,
after consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human
Services, shall make grants to eligible entities to enable the
entities to carry out programs in covered communities to train
covered workers for employment as health care professionals.
The Secretary shall make each grant in an amount of not less
than $100,000 and not more than $500,000.
''(4) Eligible entities.--Notwithstanding subsection
(b)(2)(B), to be eligible to receive a grant under this
subsection to carry out a program in a covered community, an
entity shall be a partnership that is--
''(A) under the direction of a local workforce
investment board established under section 117 that is
serving the covered community; and
''(B) composed of members serving the covered
community, such as--
''(i) an institution of higher education
that provides a 4-year program of instruction;
''(ii) an accredited community college;
''(iii) an accredited vocational or
technical school;
''(iv) a tribal college or university;
''(v) a health clinic or hospital;
''(vi) a home-based or community-based
long-term care facility or program; or
''(vii) a health care facility administered
by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
''(5) Applications.--To be eligible to receive a grant
under this subsection, an entity shall submit an application to
the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing such
information as the Secretary may require, including, at a
minimum--
''(A) a proposal to use the grant funds to
establish or expand a training program in order to
train covered workers for employment as health care
professionals (including paraprofessionals);
''(B) information demonstrating the need for the
training and support services to be provided through
the program;
''(C) information describing the manner in which
the entity will expend the grant funds, and the
activities to be carried out with the funds;
''(D) information demonstrating that the entity
meets the requirements of paragraph (4); and
''(E) with respect to training programs carried out
by the applicant, information--
''(i) on the graduation rates of the
programs involved;
''(ii) on the retention measures carried
out by the applicant;
''(iii) on the length of time necessary to
complete the training programs of the
applicant; and
''(iv) on the number of qualified covered
workers that are refused admittance into the
training programs because of lack of capacity.
''(6) Selection.--In making grants under paragraph (3), the
Secretary, after consultation with the Secretary of Health and
Human Services, shall--
''(A) consider the information submitted by the
eligible entities under paragraph (5)(E); and
''(B) select--
''(i) eligible entities submitting
applications that meet such criteria as the
Secretary of Labor determines to be
appropriate; and
''(ii) among such entities, the eligible
entities serving the covered communities with
the greatest need for the grants and the
greatest potential to benefit from the grants.
''(7) Use of funds.--
''(A) In general.--An entity that receives a grant
under this subsection shall use the funds made
available through the grant for training and support
services that meet the needs described in the
application submitted under paragraph (5), which may
include--
''(i) increasing capacity, subject to
subparagraph (B), at an educational institution
or training center to train individuals for
employment as health professionals, such as
by--
''(I) expanding a facility, subject
to subparagraph (B);
''(II) expanding course offerings;
''(III) hiring faculty;
''(IV) providing a student loan
repayment program for the faculty;
''(V) establishing or expanding
clinical education opportunities;
''(VI) purchasing equipment, such
as computers, books, clinical supplies,
or a patient simulator; or
''(VII) conducting recruitment; or
''(ii) providing support services for
covered workers participating in the training,
such as--
''(I) providing tuition assistance;
''(II) establishing or expanding
distance education programs;
''(III) providing transportation
assistance; or
''(IV) providing child care.
''(B) Limitation.--To be eligible to use the funds
to expand a facility, the eligible entity shall
demonstrate to the Secretary in an application
submitted under paragraph (5) that the entity can
increase the capacity described in subparagraph (A)(i)
of such facility only by expanding the facility.
''(8) Funding.--Of the amounts appropriated to, and
available at the discretion of, the Secretary or the Secretary
of Health and Human Services for programmatic and
administrative expenditures, a total of $25,000,000 shall be
used to establish and carry out the demonstration project
described in paragraph (2) in accordance with this
subsection.''.

Ex Output:
Community-Based Health Care Retraining Act - Amends the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to require the Secretary of Labor to establish and carry out a health professions training demonstration project that awards grants to eligible entities to train certain unemployed workers from the manufacturing or service sector for employment as health care professionals in communities with manufacturing and service sector job loss and health care professional shortages.

Ex Input:
SECTION 1. LIMITATIONS ON BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT ACTIVITIES AND
CRITERIA FOR CERTAIN DECISIONS INVOLVING SUCH ACTIVITIES.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) In 2012, the Department of Defense requested additional
rounds of defense base closure and realignment in 2013 and
2015.
(2) There have been five rounds of defense base closure and
realignment (BRAC) in the last 25 years (1988, 1991, 1993,
1995, and 2005).
(3) Congress has not approved additional rounds of base
closure and realignment to occur after 2005, and recognizes
that the 2005 round incurred substantial costs that will not be
offset by savings for nearly two decades.
(4) According to the Government Accountability Office,
implementation of the 2005 round of defense base closure and
realignment cost $35,100,000,000, or approximately
$14,100,000,000 more than was estimated by the 2005 Base
Closure and Realignment Commission.
(5) Furthermore, the Government Accountability Office has
determined that the 2005 round of defense base closure and
realignment will take 17 years before taxpayers realize net
savings from the round.
(6) On March 8, 2012, defending the request for additional
rounds of defense base closure and realignment in testimony
before the Committee on Armed Services of the House of
Representatives, Dr. Dorothy Robyn, Deputy Undersecretary of
Defense for Installations and Environment, asserted that the
Department of Defense would close military installations using
non-BRAC authorities, stating that ''if Congress does not
authorize additional BRAC rounds the department will be forced
to use its existing authorities to begin to realign and close
bases''.
(7) The Department of Defense may close or realign bases
only if a round of defense base closure and realignment is
carried out in compliance with sections 2687 and 993 of title
10, United States Code.
(8) Section 2687 of title 10, United States Code, contains
ambiguous language, leading the Department of Defense to pursue
significant closures and realignments without congressional
approval or an authorization for a round of defense base
closure and realignment.
(9) Sections 2687 and 993 of title 10, United States Code,
contain single action limits on reductions that are too easily
circumvented by cumulative actions.
(10) As demonstrated by BRAC and other closure and
realignment actions, base closures and realignments can have
significant effects on Department of Defense functions, current
and future operational capabilities, and on host communities
and States.
(11) Recommendations for closures and realignments should
be carried out only with the consent of Congress, which has the
constitutional responsibility to ''raise and support Armies,''
''provide and maintain a Navy,'' ''make Rules for the
Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces,'' and
''provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the
Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed
in the Service of the United States''.
(b) Limitations on Base Closure and Realignment Activities.--
Section 2687 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ''at which at
least 300 civilian personnel are authorized to be
employed'';
(B) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:
''(2) any realignment with respect to any military
installation involving a reduction in the number of military
and civilian personnel authorized to be employed at such
military installation at the time the Secretary of Defense
notifies Congress under subsection (b) of the Secretary's
proposal to close or realign such installation by more than the
lesser of--
''(A) 100; or
''(B) 50 percent of the highest number of military
and civilian personnel assigned to such installation
during any of the previous 4 years; or''; and
(C) in paragraph (3)--
(i) by striking ''other than a military
installation referred to in clause (1) or
(2)'';
(ii) by inserting ''military or'' before
''civilian personnel''; and
(iii) by striking ''to which clause (1) or
(2)'' and inserting ''to which paragraph (1) or
(2)'';
(2) in subsection (b)--
(A) by striking ''referred to in such subsection'';
(B) in paragraph (1)--
(i) by striking ''or the Secretary of the
military department concerned'';
(ii) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and
(B) as subparagraphs (B) and (D), respectively;
(iii) by inserting before subparagraph (B),
as redesignated by clause (ii), the following
new subparagraph:
''(A) a justification for the proposed action;'';
(iv) in subparagraph (B), as so
redesignated, by striking ''; and'' and
inserting a semicolon;
(v) by inserting after subparagraph (B), as
so redesignated, the following new
subparagraph:
''(C) a description of the alternatives
considered;'';
(vi) in clause (ii) of subparagraph (D), as
so redesignated, by striking ''; and'' and
inserting a semicolon; and
(vii) by inserting after subparagraph (D),
as so redesignated, the following new
subparagraphs:
''(E) an estimate of the number of military,
civilian, and contractor personnel affected by the
proposed action; and
''(F) a plan to provide support for affected
communities; and''; and
(C) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:
''(2) Congress has enacted legislation expressly
authorizing the action.'';
(3) in subsection (c)--
(A) by striking ''shall not apply to the closure''
and inserting the following: ''shall not apply--
''(1) to the closure'';
(B) by striking ''or a military emergency.'' and
inserting ''or a military emergency; or''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:
''(2) to the relocation from a military installation of
personnel or functions that are required to support the
deployment of members of the armed forces, provided that such
personnel and functions are returned to the military
installation after the deployment.'';
(4) in subsection (d), by striking ''(1) After the
expiration'' and all that follows through ''(2) Nothing in this
section'' and inserting ''Nothing in this section'';
(5) in subsection (e)--
(A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ''and any public
land under Bureau of Land Management control that is
withdrawn and reserved for military training and
testing'' after ''including any leased facility'';
(B) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:
''(3) The term 'realignment' includes any action or
combination of actions within a 4-year period that reduces or
relocates functions and military or civilian personnel
positions, but does not include a reduction in force resulting
from a reduction in military end strength levels or a reduction
in total civilian personnel levels.'';
(C) by striking paragraph (4); and
(D) by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:
''(4) The term 'closure' includes any action or combination
of actions that results in the elimination of all active
functions at a military installation, the elimination of all
military and civilian personnel positions at a military
installation, or the placement of a military installation into
non-active status.''; and
(6) by adding at the end the following new subsections:
''(g) For purposes of this section, the component bases of a joint
base shall be considered as independent military installations, and not
collectively as a single military installation.
''(h) For purposes of this section, any leased space in which more
than 300 combined military and civilian personnel are housed shall be
considered to be an independent military installation, and shall not be
considered part of a larger military installation. Functions and
personnel located at a leased space may be transferred to another
leased space located within 50 miles or to the nearest military
installation located within 50 miles notwithstanding any limitations in
this section.''.

Ex Output:
Revises provisions concerning a required congressional notification and waiting period prior to the closure or realignment of a military installation by the Department of Defense (DOD) to instead prohibit, absent specific legislative authorization, any realignment involving a reduction of the lesser of: (1) 100 or more combined military and civilian personnel, or (2) 50% of the highest number of such personnel assigned to that installation during any of the previous four years. Allows only the Secretary of Defense (under current law, either such Secretary or the Secretary of the military department concerned) to provide such notification, and to include a description of the alternatives considered, an estimate of the number of military, civilian, and contractor personnel affected, and a plan to provide support for affected communities.

Excepts from such requirements the relocation of personnel or functions required to support the deployment of members of the Armed Forces, as long as such personnel and functions are returned to the installation after the deployment.

Includes as a military installation, for purposes of such requirements: (1) any public land under Bureau of Land Management control that is withdrawn and reserved for military training and testing, and (2) any leased space in which more than 300 combined military and civilian personnel are housed.