Mr. Speaker, the second petition deals with concerns about child pornography, specifically in British Columbia, and the fact that the B.C. Court of Appeal has struck down subsection 163(1)(4) of the criminal code that makes possession of child pornography a criminal offence and that the court decision is therefore placing children in British Columbia at risk.
Does this next sentence follow, given the preceding text?
They can no longer prosecute for a person having child porn.

Options are: [+] Yes; [+] It's impossible to say; [+] No;
Yes