In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Fuck Trump and fuck your piece of shit "newspaper."

Ex Output:
Obscene

Ex Input:
Comment: Caldwell is trying to bankrupt this city before he leaves office.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene

Ex Input:
Comment: Meanwhile Erdogan is bullying any opposition into submission through intimidation and fear in order to gain absolute power through 2029. The Globe barely addresses Turkey's regression under Erdogan after 70+ years of secularism because of some misguided commitment to political correctness. The religious implications of Erdogan's government conflict with the Globe's "progressive" agenda; essentially, Erdogan is an unapologetic Islamist and the last 10 years are a reflection of Islamism's natural progression as a political force to suffocate liberal secularism and individual freedoms in favour of an authoritarian state governed by religious law. No free expression, no free press, no freedom of association, and a constitutional amendment that would give Erdogan the powers of a Sultan. The fact that the Globe's writers would be arrested in Turkey if they covered Erdogan the same way they do Trump highlights the Globe's shameless bias, the irony would be comical if not so pitiful.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene