input question: The Biblioteca Ambrosena (Piazza Pio XI) has reopened in the newly restored 17th-century palace and library of Cardinal Federigo Borromeo. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The Biblioteca Ambrosena was never reopened."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "To the west of the Accademia, the Ca' Rezzonico is another canal-side design of Longhena, completed in the 18th century and now a museum (reopened in 2000) dedicated to those swan-song years of the Venice's Most Serene Republic, la Serenissima.", can we conclude that "The museum, a design of Longhena, is dedicated to la Serenissima."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Even for a mammoth like ATandT, the economics of going local are close to prohibitive, because the local loop is the most expensive part of the entire system to build and operate.

Sentence B: Going local is a cost effective course of action for AT&T.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: sure okay what else can we talk about who do you work for
I want to know nothing about who you work for.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
well right now we're in a delicate situation because we've got this we've for the first time we're sort of aligned with a lot of these Arab countries

Here is a hypothesis:
Both of us at the moment are involved in a fragile scenario.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question:
okay you too bye-bye

Does it follow that "No, don't do that."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no