Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

CONTEXT: It is a lot clearer in the book. They where both quite willing to run, but Gale expected only Katniss, himself and their families. He did start turning his opinion around when Katniss mentioned she's taking Haymitch and, of all people, Peeta, too! In the book, Katniss then mentioned an uprising happening in District 8, which caused Gale to see an opportunity to bring down the Capitol, without any need to have Peeta along for a desperate escape that may easily fail. Also, it was winter, so finding food on the way would have been quite a challenge, too. Actually, the whole thing may have played out differently if only it had been spring. <sep> Q: Why did Katniss and Gale not run away when they had the chance? A: They where both quite willing to run, but Gale expected only Katniss, himself and their families Q: Who did katniss want to take? A: Katniss mentioned she's taking Haymitch Q: Why did she want to take haymitch? A: it was winter, so finding food on the way would have been quite a challenge <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did the winter stop them from leaving?
Yes

CONTEXT: I think he was talking about his dead wife: Parry is saying he remembers everything about what happened and forgives Jack, so Jack can find peace, that's why he was crying (Jack is the wounded, tormented Fisher King and Parry the simple-minded man that helps him, in my interpretation of the movie). <sep> Q: Which girl Parry was referring to after waking up?
Yes

CONTEXT: I don't think it had any plot driven change. The Bond franchise was feeling threatened by newer spy movies (such as the Bourne series) which have more action, (slightly) more plausible plots (compared to ray-gun satellites etc), and have less comedic elements. A reboot with a new younger actor and a deliberate step away from some of the conventions of the franchise (gadgets & moneypenny for example) were their answer. They tried to take it this direction before - a Licence to Kill was a deliberate attempt with a drug-smuggling and revenge plot-line, but wasn't well done. They then decided to switch back to more 'classic' Bond approaches with Brosnan. <sep> Q: Why is James Bond less tech savvy in the Daniel Craig movies? A: The Bond franchise was feeling threatened by newer spy movies (such as the Bourne series) which have more action Q: What changes were made to make the movies more like the Bourne series? A: a new younger actor and a deliberate step away from some of the conventions of the franchise (gadgets & moneypenny for example <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What changes were made to the gadgets?
No