Question:
Based on the premise "i was afraid we might get into an argument well uh", can we conclude that "There were other reasons than arguing that I was afraid of."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Witness the new anti-sweatshop consortium, featuring Nike, Liz Claiborne, Kathie Lee Gifford, et.

Sentence B: Nike, Liz Clailborne and Kathie Lee all reject the new anti-sweatshop consortium.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: But Pixar went public at a price 77 percent lower than the highest price people paid for its shares on the opening day of trading.
Pixar went on to become a popular company.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
As the weeks went by, the state of Poirot's nerves grew worse and worse.

Here is a hypothesis:
Poirot was almost never this nervous, but got more and more anxious as the weeks went by.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Albert's still below, and must be just hopping mad by this time." With which Julius departed abruptly.

Sentence 2: Albert's probably mad that we didn't join him.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"right that that that's real good and i and i bet it gives you a real good feeling to be doing that"
Hypothesis: That's really good and I expect it gives you a good feeling.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes