IN: This is an email
This is just a short update on the conference call just completed with Michael Adewumi of Penn State, concerning the PCB pipeline modeling project proposed for the Transwestern mainline system. David Roensch, Dr. Adewumi and myself discussed the latest proposal submitted by Adewumi and based upon his answers to the technical and operational questions, it appears that the model will yeild some useful information. Adewumi was asked about the simultaneous modeling of PCB's and arsenic and feels that the model can address this situation. He felt that by initiating the model to the pipeline segement selected for the study (between C/S 4 and C/S3) this information could be projected to the other pipeline segments with physical and elevational conditions not represented in the segment selected. As is the case with most projects of this nature, answers to some questions cannot be addressed until we begin the process. It appears that the next step in this process is to have Mike Terraso contact Michael Adewumi. David Roensch and I will be available to feed technical and operational information to Adewumi for his modeling input. It may also be in the best interest of this project to see a team of technical and operational experts from Enron and Transwestern begin a brain stroming of this project during the data input stage to address issues related to the field cleaning trials, both of the pipeline system and the C/S piping. By working through the process, we may be able to alleviate some potential concerns and increase the cleaning success. Although Transwestern has been involved in this type of cleaning for a number of years, based upon the liquids data results, the system has met with variable success. The more technical and operational information we can incorporate into the model, the better will be the modeling conclusions and results of the cleaning activity.

What is the subject?

OUT: Conference Cal with Adewumi

IN: This is an email
Mike & Sally, Below is the information that we received on the project. I am still waiting on a cost center from EES for the expense portions to settle to. Look over this information and let me know if you still want to meet to go over this. This is the EES project, which is set up on EES to capture the capital portion of the project costs. The expense portion should settle to an EES cost center. The project set up shown below is the Networks project, which I set up, but have not yet released. Only Release 1 is shown below. There are three releases set up, but only the first one will be released at this time. All three releases or phases will look like the other phases. As you can see below, the capital parts of the project (Solution Definition, Design & Build, and Implementation & Testing) are set up with three basic WBS elements. These elements as described below will settle to the EES project as follows. Project Coding on Networks Project Settles to EES Project WBS C.300000.01.SD.OU Rel 1 SD Outside Consultants Labor C.007730.22.01 Outside Professional C.300000.01.SD.EN Rel 1 SD Enron Labor C.007730.22.03 Enron Labor C.300000.01.SD.OE Rel 1 SD Other Expenditures C.007730.22.05 Other Expenditure C.300000.01.HW Hardware Purchases C.007730.24.01 Hardware C.300000.01.SW Software Purchases C.007730.24.02 Software This will allow the costs on the Networks project to be tracked in a manor that will support how the charges are settling to EES. So if EES has any questions about the charges we should be able to pull up the detail very quickly. The following items will settle to an EES cost center since they are expense related. C.300000.01.PI.TR Rel 1 PI Training Dev & Delivery C.300000.01.PI.PI Rel 1 PI Post Implementation Support C.300000.01.PI.GA Rel 1 PI General & Administrative

What is the subject?

OUT: Genesys or now the Liberty Project

IN: This is an email
While you were out, it was a bit crazed as you expected. I'll hit some highlights for you: Botchlett and Straub position statements: went out on Wednesday. Chapman: I sent the Ok. lawyer a letter and hired Lyn Mattson to investigate. Roome: Spoke with Trey (we had a case against each other a while back and get along well) and sent him a letter. Left Haedicke a message asking if we should give anyone in particular a head's up that they mentioned the SEC investigation. He says don't need to pass along. Anthony Sexton: Got out that separation agreement. Ken Rice: Sent Mark Haedicke a memo outlining the non-competition obligations and potential issues. CC'd you on it. Kitchen/Nettleton: Further discussions with T&F, Oxley, Marcus, Tim Callaghan, etc. Sounds like Marcus is happy. We're getting packet for consular process out to T&F, they send to London, and we think that with some luck (depending on FBI delay on background check), January or February may hold their interviews. Marcus decided not to switch to J&G. RIF: I helped out on some connected stuff, including helping Kerry with release language and speaking with counsel in Mexico so HR can determine what needs to go into calculations for analysis of shutdown of all Mexico ops. Internet Use: Prepared a memo for Oxley. He hasn't responded about whether he wishes to use it. He walked someone out the door (without talking to legal) for posting on the internet from work. New Hire: I did what Vance says was the final new hire orientation. :( We'll talk on your return about figuring out how to tell new hires what they need to know. Hope you had a good trip and a happy Thanksgiving!

What is the subject?

OUT:
various updates