Q: The authors work for the court.
It is simply evaluating what the term should be prospectively in a way that we presume this Court should presume is legitimate under the First Amendment. When it legislates retrospectively, it is, in effect, looking at particular authors and estates of authors who are before Congress asking for this extension, and it's choosing between these particular authors and the public at large.
A: It's impossible to say
Q: The Canadian House of Commons ordered an invasion of the united states during World War 1.
The land claims agreement must still be approved by the Canadian House of Commons , but has already passed through the House of Assembly of Newfoundland and Labrador.
A: It's impossible to say
Q: Judy Sgro testified before the Canadian parliament
The Canadian parliament's Ethics Commission said former immigration minister, Judy Sgro, did nothing wrong and her staff had put her into a conflict of interest.
A: It's impossible to say
Q: This statement says that the only way to create the wealth to solve social issues is to make a plan to create wealth.
If we want to generate the type of wealth and the type of economic growth required to address all the social issues and challenges we heard about from coast to coast to coast, then there is no question in my mind that the only way we can do that is to put a plan together that speaks to the issue of improving the standard of living for people.
A:
Yes