Mark, I can use your advise on a few new projects that I am working on. 1. The weather desk is trying to roll out a HDD Swap for Calgary by Monday= . Most of the anticipated buyers of the product will be Canadian counterpa= rties ECC has masters with. The desk originally thought that we need to cr= eate a GTC for Enron Canada using the ENA weather GTC. Because if the time= issues involved in creating a new GTC (fixing all the things that are wron= g with the ENA form) I looked for a new way to deal with this issue. I thi= nk I found it in section 3(d) of the ETA which provides that the Enron coun= terparty to a particular transaction will be the Enron Entity they have a m= aster with that covers that type of transaction. I believe this provision = was a stroke of genius designed for just this type of scenario. I can prep= are the long description to specify the Enron entity as "the applicable Enr= on entity" and if there is a master then the Enron Entity is the one with t= he master pursuant to Section 3(d) of the ETA and if there is no master the= ETA says the GTC applies and the GTC specifies that ENA is the counterpart= y. Do you think this works? 2. I was contacted by someone at McKinsey & Company yesterday who is worki= ng with the weather desk to develop a Bermuda Transformer Commercial Struct= ure to partner up with the Insurance market to provide some capital to our = weather trading desk. I have been told that conceptually it will be a Jedi= type arrangement. I have been asked to help them think through the issues= and coordinate with the other attorneys who work on these types of issues.= I do not want to get too deep into the structuring of this investment veh= icle myself without the appropriate legal group involved. Would this be so= mething Jordan Mintz's group would handle or would this be something that L= ance Schuler's group would develop? I thought I might want to talk to Juli= a Murrey (or Cristina Mordant or Carol St. Clair) to see what issues croppe= d up in the development of Jedi I and Jedi II (or maybe I should just talk = to whatever lawyer is currently handling these structures). What are your = thoughts on how to move forward? 3. The other rush deal is a financing deal out of Jordan's group. The dea= l I helped look at that was a physical forward using ISDA type language is = now a financial deal (a series of Total Return Swaps) that needs to close n= ext Friday. I will go to a meeting in the morning to try and get more info= rmation on the structure. Angela Davis who has worked on the Total Return = swap deals has offered to help me pilot this through. Sara thought I shoul= d check with you to make sure you don't have a problem with me taking on on= e of these deals. I am going to try and make sure they have Danny Sullivan= from A&K working on the deal since he is the most knowledgeable lawyer on = this type of structure. =20 I hope all goes well with your return flight plans. Brent
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: New Project Direction
I believe all the bugs have been worked out of this one. It pulls in inter-desk swaps and includes all the features you guys have requested - sorts by delivery point or hour, able to refresh, etc. I've saved the download as EOL Download (in P://Real Time/Increment/Windows 2000) and deleted the file called NEW EOL DOWNLOAD. Test is out and let me know what you think. Thanks.
Answer: Revised EOL Download - PLEASE USE
Here is an email: Tana - When you have the ETA amendment letter ready for TECO to see, could you please e-mail it to Pat Castoro at TECO (pacastoro@tecoenergy.com) and also forward a copy to their counsel - Brian Harms (brian.harms@troutmansanders.com). The legal name that needs to be on this letter is TECO EnergySource, Inc. There will also be a second letter amendment for a partnership that is being formed by TECO under the name TECO-Panda Generating Company, LP. Thanks.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: TECO EnergySource Inc.
Q: Kim, John Cogan and I had called asking for copies of three transaction agreements. I had not seen those yet so I wanted to send an e-mail clarifying which dates we are looking for. Could you please fax copies of the transaction agreements dated: 3/11/99, 11/28/00 & 6/1/01 to me at fax number 520-779-5338. Thanks very much for your help with this. Eileen Hamlin Procurement Analyst
Propose a subject line
A: Transaction Agreements
IN: Mitch/John, Here's the form of LOI I was thinking of using, in draft form. I don't know how much information we are prepared to fill in on the term sheet. If we don't have enough to fill in we can always skip the term sheet for now. Kay

Generate a subject line.

OUT: BPUB LOI
IN: This is an email
On October 19, Consumers Energy filed tariff sheets and workpapers changes rates and rate calculation methodologies for firm and non-firm transmission service. Consumers states that the filing is in compliance with a letter order issued by the Commission October 5. The filed sheets are to have retroactive effective dates (1992; 1993). Interventions/protests are due Nov. 16. Please contact me if you need further information.

What is the subject?

OUT:
Consumers Energy -- tariff filing