Problem: Video The video was filmed in 2004 and investigated as part of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program. It's not clear if the object was ever identified. The New York Times reports that the US Department of Defense programme was shut down in 2012.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The Department of Defense program was shut down in 2009. "? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: No

Problem: How to say no to a child and mean it<br>Say " no " in a clear, firm tone. Start by saying " no " in a tone that is clear, firm, and in control. Raise your voice so the child can hear you but do not yell or scream when you say " no.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Raising your voice to a child is a good way of telling them no."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: Yes

Problem: Could we then go back to Justice O'Connor's question? To make that very specific, if we agree with you, does that mean that we would, in principle, have to hold the 1976 extension unconstitutional? I mean, in 1976, Congress extended the term from 28 years renewable once, to life of the author plus 50 years. Now they're extending it life of the author plus 70. If the latter is unconstitutional on your theory, how could the former not be? And if the former is, the chaos that would ensue would be horrendous.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Could we then go back to the lovely Justice O'Connor's question?"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A:
It's impossible to say