Question: Sentence A: 10 The process of transitioning from the construction permit to the operating permit varies among States, but the application review process is estimated to take between 9 - 11 months.

Sentence B: On average applications are reviewed within a year.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: and like you have your own little code name you know and you'd type in hi how are you and they'd type back and everybody and you'd have five or six or seven people talking to each other at the same time and everything everybody said
You wouldn't have talked to any of the others before.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
It should be noted that this raises an important policy issue.

Here is a hypothesis:
This raises an important policy issue.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Opposite on Padang Pahlawan (Bandar Hill) a sound-and-light show is held in the evenings, following the tradition of turning history into entertainment to draw the crowds.

Sentence 2: Bandar Hill brings in the most tourism in the country.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
However, the nature of these Federal physical assets that are classified as stewardship PP and E differ from general PP and E in that their values may be indeterminable or may have little meaning (for example, museum collections, monuments, assets acquired in the formation of the nation) or that allocating the cost of such assets (for example, military weapons systems and space exploration hardware) to accounting periods that benefit from the ownership of such assets is meaningless.

Does it follow that "It is meaningless to allocate the costs of assets like these."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "We actually hope to expand our services as a result of the merger, she said.", can we conclude that "The merger was beneficial because they will be able to provide better services."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell