As we discussed, I wanted to confirm LRCI, Inc.'s consent to our recordation of the map referenced in Exhibit A of the Act of Sale as a part of the Act of Sale pursuant to which Reliant Energy Gas Storage, LLC purchased real property from LRCI on November 26, 2001. If this is acceptable, please so indicate by responding to this email. Thanks!
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Recordation of map referenced in metes and bounds description
Well, I didn't get this out to you before I left the office last night. I was still pouring over bonus info until 9:30, and decided to call it quits at that point. Here are some of the things that I would like to do next week: review your action plan to move the close and officialization of London books to same day, to replicate, if appropriate, an Operational Risk information session for London counterparts (you and I can review early in the week what we are doing here in Houston today and modify the info for Europe) discuss the Doorstep process with you and, if you deem appropriate, your business controllers in the London office who will participate in Doorstep reviews this year (clear up and questions and get your input on how to continually improve the process), discuss with Mark Pickering the technology dependencies of the London office related to speeding up London's information for the corporate DPR do some planning with you for the February 12 & 13 ASE discuss the feasibility of utilizing our operational pricing model in London discuss your ideas and thoughts on CommodityLogic and other ideas around potential commercialization of mid and back office services In addition, I would like to meet with anyone in the London office that you think would be beneficial. Through Nicki Scott, I understand that Michael Brown would like to meet with me so we are setting that up. I will also spend some time with Beth Apollo and Ted Murphy while I am there. And I plan to meet with Fernley as well. Any other suggestions on topics or people to see? I think that we have lunch already on the calendar for Wednesday.
Answer: Topics for next week
Here is an email: Spoke to Carrie at the lawyer's office today. Everything has been signed by Mary and Carrie will mail me the originals to sign. I asked about a termination ont he $1500.00, Joal told Carrie that since we couldn't include it in this agreement since we didn't agree to it in the meeting with Mary. IF Mary agrees, they will prepare and addendum to the original agreement. I've learned a lot and the sooner we are through with this lawyer the happier I will be. BE NICE NOW.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Legal Stuff
Q: Here is the most recent (and dare we hope last?) draft of the ABB agreement. Kathy Clark is preparing a redline for your use, and you should have it shortly. ABB may be insistent upon dating this June 30, but we will try the 7th with an effective date of the 30th. Ben advises that this is a very, very critical point to ABB. I have not taken ABB's comment on the assignment language, but I hope they will accept what we've given them in this draft. I have been advised that the price reduction is due to more definitive design criteria being provided by Enron. Matt Gockerman points out that their is exposure to Missouri sales tax, so we will need WestLB's cooperation in getting the proper exemption certificate for MO. Have I forgotten to address any questions or comments? Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: ABB rev 10
IN: Dear Ms Leisure: If you're still tanning, and still up for lunch, I'm game. Besides, I owe you a beer. Let me know. Don't work too hard, Best,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Still beached
IN: This is an email
John, Here is a brief email on a possible resolution for the European/Oslo weather situation. Mark sent this draft to me last weekend but i haven't had time to review it this week. Personally, I think that this is the wrong answer from a Corporate perspective but this issue keeps hanging around and isn't worth any more of our time. For what it is worth, I think our communication strategy did make a big difference but didn't get us exactly where we needed to be. These groups will be expected (and held accountable) for good and consistent communication on an ongoing basis as well. For a P&L that is this small (and negative) we are all spending too much time on this. There is more to this story but I think we should just drop it and move on to bigger and better things. I am certainly not wedded to any of this but would rather focus on all the other issues and problems on my plate. Let's discuss upon your return on our weekly call. Thanks and I hope your vacation was relaxing. Mike ps-this hasn't been shared outside the group on the email.

What is the subject?

OUT:
European Weather