Q: Can we conclude from "The child is observing the object and is concentrating very hard." that "The child is watching something."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: A child observing something does imply a child is watching something.

Q: Premise: "Man sitting in the shadows on the steps of a building."
Hypothesis: "A shadowy figure on some steps."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: yes
Chain-of-thought: We can describes man in the shadows as a shadowy figure.

Q: Premise: "A dog is twisting in the air as it tries to catch a frisbee."
Hypothesis: "A dog performing for a crowd."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: A dog catching a frisbee does not mean it was performing for a crowd.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A construction site with a worker in a green bandanna sitting down as he works on something."
Hypothesis: "A man is walking down the street."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: no
Chain-of-thought:
One man is working and the other man is walking down the street.