In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[Q]: Comment: Piece of shit post from a piece of shit poster.
[A]: Insult

[Q]: Comment: The Nones on the Bus view the Church through a rear view mirror. As they pull out, they hear the fading sounds of "All are welcome.." and they feel the pain of irony and lies. They are women who practice birth control amid a "sinner" cry of celibate cardinals; they are students at Notre Dame and Georgetown told by the Newman Society they aren't at authentic Catholic universities; they are young kids told by the bishop Grandma and Uncle Mike aren't invited to the altar with them; they are gays told to follow as truth apparitions in long-ago places but to distrust their consciences; they are laity told "It's not about clerical power," then ordered to know their place; they are young couples told by old men when, how, and why to have intimate relations; they are activists in a democracy who received a letter from the bishop proclaiming to not tell them how to vote--then tells them how NOT to vote; they are told JPII is "Great," but Francis is confusing; they are told EWTN has truth...
[A]: Non-insult

[Q]: Comment: LOTL, that petition you mention in your last sentence can be read in John's Gospel (17:21). Since you made the sentence an exclamation, I presume that you, like me, recognize just how pivotal is the petition to (and how definitional of) any genuine claim to be Jesus' disciple. What exactly was Jesus asking of his Father? If you read to the end of the chapter, the answer is clearly stated: "...that the love with which thou hast loved me may be in them, and I in them." (The New Oxford Annotated Bible, v 26)

The unity Jesus seeks of his followers is primarily a unity in love, not doctrine. I don't deny the importance of doctrine, but I do deny that it has supreme importance. Belief in (intellectual assent to) the dogma of the Eucharist cannot redeem a person: only Eucharistic love, manifested in and through word and deed, can do this. Note, however, that intellectual assent to Eucharistic dogma is not a condition for exercising the love referenced by the dogma.
[A]:
Non-insult