QUESTION: Given the sentence "A man in neon green jacket slides down a rail using his snowboard." can we conclude that "A man is doing sports."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A man sliding down a rail using his snowboard may not necessarily be doing sports.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A young boy laying on a hospital bed with his leg over the side."
Hypothesis: "A boy on a dirtbike."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Either the boy is laying on a hospital bed or he is on a dirtbike. He cannot be doing both.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "Man plays scrabble in a kitchen."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man is playing dominos." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Man is a very specific statement compared to A man which is very vague.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "Two female volleyball players try to hit the ball."
Hypothesis: "Two female volleyball players fighting for the ball."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: The players try to hit the ball which means they must be fighting for the ball.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Seven women sitting at a table eating."
Hypothesis: "Seven women sitting at a table eating at a wedding."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Sitting at a table eating doesn't imply being at a wedding.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A black dog is in midair as a woman behind it cheers."
Hypothesis: "A dog is performing tricks for a woman."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A:
The dog is in midair but that doesn't necessarily imply the dog is performing tricks for the woman.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.