We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: In England, where currently the private ownership of hand guns by the law abiding is absolutely prohibited, crimes involving the use of guns are rapidly increasing: only the criminals have access to them.
Sent2: By that brand of logic, any gun law is specifically aimed at reducing criminal use of guns, including a complete ban.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: You're saying that an unarmed man can't have intent to cause violence since he's unarmed?
Sent2: He says that you can't judge the intent of others to make a life or death decision, but if you see somebody stabbing another person, then it's likely not a Sunday greeting that means nothing.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The argument isn't that guns promote or cause crime, it is that when crimes happen having a gun involved causes more damage.
Sent2: Again, I don't think anybody will argue that owning a gun prevents crime.

A:
Not similar
****