It appears that the evergreen function on certain Transport contracts is not working. Take a look at deal 98243. I just had to extend the date for May 31, 2000.
Answer: Sitara
Here is an email: On October 17, 2001 Rockland Electric Company and PJM filed with FERC a joi= nt application for the transfer of operational control from the NYISO to PJ= M of certain facilities located in Northern New Jersey. The facilities are= the transmission assets in the Eastern Division of Rockland's service terr= itory. This includes approximately 400 MW of load in Bergen County, NJ and= transmission facilities that are already directly interconnected with PJM = (note that other Rockland facilities located in NJ, namely those in norther= n Passaic County and Sussex County (Rockland's Central and Western Division= s respectively) will not be transferred to PJM and will remain under the op= erational control of the NYISO since these facilities are not directly inte= rconnected with PJM nor with Rockland's Eastern Division). The filing requ= ests approval of the transfer by November 30, 2001 which would allow PJM to= take operational control on February 1, 2002 (the filing does not address = what, if any, changes to the operation date might be if FERC does not appro= ve this by Nov 30). Rockland Electric is a subsidiary of Orange & Rockland= Utilities which is a subsidiary of Con Edison. The transfer adds approximately 400 MW of load and 56,000 customers (mostly= residential and commercial) to PJM. There is no increase in supply, there= fore the total load of PJM is increased by 400 MW without any additional re= sources. The transmission assets include 138-kV (8.3 miles), 69-kV (35.9 m= iles) and 35-kV (12.4 miles) transmission lines and 11 substations (the fil= ing includes a detailed description of these assets). Let me know if you require any additional information.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Rockland Electric Transfer to PJM
Q: Some questions in advance of the 42nd floor meeting on the 16th: Do you expect the current crisis in California will result in an "overbuilt" situation for the pipelines serving California, similar to 1993-94? It seems like everyone has an expansion proposal. Do you expect the situation in India to be resolved to our satisfaction? What is your projection for year-end stock price?
Propose a subject line
A: QUESTIONS
IN: We are selling 20,000 day to Transco at TP #5564. It will cost us $.0153 to go from St 65 to the Sims deal, no fuel. The transport usage deal is 289228. Let me know if you have any questions.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: New Transport deal
IN: This is an email
Hi Mom, Where are we staying in Telluride again? I have been looking at some restaurants on telluride.org - it looks like they have some nice places. Maybe we should look into doing a sleigh ride or snowmobile dinner outing one night.

What is the subject?

OUT: Telluride
As we discussed, I never received a confirmation of the May, June and July forward gas purchase (1,000 per day at Ventura at $2.895/mmBtu). This purchase was made through Brian Frihart. I need to know if Enron plans to stand behind this purchase. Without confirmation, I will assume that the deal is no longer valid.
Answer:
Confirmation of Forward Purchase