This is the content of an email: As promised. The Illinois Power CA info is: Counterparty:Illinois Power 500 S.27th Decataur, Ill 62521 Attn: Steve Warren Deal info: IP is the Utility relative to our proposed NICOR transaction Facility: Nicor Storage Facility at Troy Grove, Ill Note: IP is owned by Dynegy, however, I understand that IP is bound by "affiliate rules" with regards to Dynegy. How comfortable are you with this? Do you think we need additional language in the CA to protect us? With regards to the Devon CA the following are the Devon comments; You should add at the beginning of paragraph 3, the following: "Each party represents that in providing Confidential Information to the other, it has the right and authority to do so." Whenever we look at a CA, we should endeavor to limit it in time and coverage. You say that the agreement concerns purchase of electricity in the Carthage area, but in the opening paragraph, the CA states that it is related to "a proposed sale and/or purchase of natural gas or fuel." You should get this clarified to say something more definitive. For example, more definitive language would be something like "...in connection with a proposed sale and/or purchase of electricity in the Carthage Field area for purpose of providing power to compression facilities." Other than that, the CA looks good. Thanks. >>> Blaine Wofford 07/25/01 07:52AM >>> Jim, do you mind taking a quick look at this document. It's relative to the purchase of electricity for the Carthage area. Thanks,

Subject: More CA's- Deals to follow?

This is the content of an email: Jeff, Let me know what you think. Please make changes to make more accurate and effective. I will send this to him and follow up with a discussion. It needs some work. m draft John, I have just had some additional discussions on our Global weather business and have come to a decision on how we need to run the weather business. I believe that we do need 100% full time dedication from each and any employee that is dedicated to the weather business including in the overall development and execution of or global strategy and positions. I have a great deal of confidence and am holding Mark Tawney responsible and accountable for extensive growth and profitability in the business. We need to hire additional people to add to grow the business in Japan and Australia. Joe and Paul are on board with this strategy and Mark will work with them to accomplish the hiring of people and needed resources. This will not be talk but we will get these people in place by specific deadlines. We will pay all of those people's expenses and they will be on board with the hiring and will be expected to be a valuable team player and resource to their group. On the Norway front, we need to implement the same organization structure. We have talked a lot about Thor and better communication, but we need to make a change. We will have weekly calls with him and the weather group to make sure that we are all on the same page and he is up to speed with where we are going. Jeff did have a video call with Thor to talk about his email and it went well. Upon my return I learned that Thor and the London group put out a press release about putting out pricing on 1,000 cities and even changing the index. Neither Mark or Jeff were even aware of this event nor was it even brought up in the call as something that was going to happen. Also the hiring of xxxxxx as a weather originator, without any discussion, also illustrates the lack of communication or desire to work together. I am not saying that Mark or Thor are totally to blame, they both deserve credit for not working together, but we are going to change the future and make sure that it will work better. I know that all of Thor's group is very loyal to Thor and may not want to transition into EGM and if that is the case, we can make it work via London. I think the key is our approach to Thor and that this isn't meant as a reflection on him but is a consistent change with how we are running all of our businesses around the world. The weather piece of his business is very small and isn't going to effect his P&L significantly (he'll actually be net positive!) Please give me a call and we will discuss the issues surrounding this new structure and the best way to communicate it to those involved to make this the most effective. This email is going just to you and Jeff and won't be shared with anyone else. mike

Subject: Weather organization

This is the content of an email: I have received the executed CA from Energy Solutions. I will return a copy to customer and send a copy to fuller and nemec. Dave, please coordinate next steps with client including an immediate review of all the commercial details that they can share with us, including any paper that they have or are contemplating. I am OK with a meeting on monday ( late ) or tues a.m... in L.A. but will insist that we see some paperwork first to determine our next steps. Pls advise after you have talked to customer. BT

Subject: Energy Solutions Gas USA Inc - Confidentiality

This is the content of an email: Rick called and asked me to sit in on a meeting on enegy issues that he's having tomorrow in Houston. Wants me to bring to the table information on gas issues, particularly in light of the SoCalGas settlement here in California. I'll be leaving at the crack of dawn tomorrow monring and will be in Houston on Tuesday/Wednesday and back in the office on Thursday.
Subject: Schedule Change for the Week