input question: As with all the holy places of Jainism, you must remove not only your shoes but any leather you may be wearing. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The tenets of Jainism demand that everyone must be wearing shoes when they come into a holy place."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "I can imagine she would, said Sir James grimly.", can we conclude that "I would think that she would, said Sir James darkly."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Milosevic points to 1989.

Sentence B: Milosevic suggests the year 1989.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: And what about Rupaul?
Can Rupaul be included?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
46 Higher Expected Spending and Call for New Benefit Underscore Need for Meaningful Reform (GAO-01-539T, March 22, 2001).

Here is a hypothesis:
reform is needed for new military benefits

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
He poured several skins together and drank the stuff, forcing himself to endure the agony of its passage down his throat.

Does it follow that "After drinking, he was left with a sore throat for days."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell