In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question based on the context. You have to classify the questions into "Extractive", "Abstractive", or "Yes-no" questions. Extractive questions can be answered by concatenating extracts taken from a context into a summary while answering abstractive questions involves paraphrasing the context using novel sentences. Yes-no question is a question whose expected answer is one of two choices, one that affirms the question and one that denies the question. Typically, the choices are either yes or no.

[EX Q]: Then, we created test sets with varying levels of perturbation operations - $\lbrace 20\%,40\%,60\%
brace $.
Question: Are recurrent neural networks trained on perturbed data?
[EX A]: Yes-no

[EX Q]: Results reveal that, contrary to the common belief, correlations between Rouge and the Pyramid scores are weak, which challenges its effectiveness for scientific summarization. Furthermore, we show a large variance of correlations between different Rouge variants and the manual evaluations which further makes the reliability of Rouge for evaluating scientific summaries less clear.
Question: What is the common belief that this paper refutes? (c.f. 'contrary to the common belief, ROUGE is not much [sic] reliable'
[EX A]: Extractive

[EX Q]: In contrast, in order to exploit section information, in this paper we propose to capture a distributed representation of both the global (the whole document) and the local context (e.g., the section/topic) when deciding if a sentence should be included in the summary
Question: What do they mean by global and local context?
[EX A]:
Extractive