Question:
Based on the premise "Participants also focused on the roles of the nominating, compensation, and audit committees noting that (1) nominating committees need to independently identify candidates for board membership rather than rubber stamp management's candidates, (2) compensation committees need to focus more on achievements related to the company's long-term strategic objectives and less on short-term accomplishments, such as meeting earnings projections, and (3) audit committees need to work more effectively with the independent auditor as defined by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and not get tied up in procedural matters concerned with their legal liabilities as committee members.", can we conclude that "Participants ignored the committees' roles"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "yeah and he he went to uh he went to the bank and he took um i can't remember the guy the guy he defended for murder Earl you know they had a lien against his house so he'd pay his legal bills do you remember that", can we conclude that "He took Earl to the bank to get the money he owed him."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 defines a number of audit committee responsibilities for the hiring, compensation, and oversight of auditors.", can we conclude that "The audit committee only has one responsibility defined by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no