We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: Look online at firearm replicas and see how many retailers have statements about not being able to ship to certain states.

Output: Valid

Input: Consider Input: I would argue, for example, that since so called assault weapons are not as common today as handguns then they must be more dangerous and unususal and therefore more subject to a ban.

Output: Valid

Input: Consider Input: And if the ones we already have aren't being enforced just like all the other laws, why should we believe that new gun laws will be enforced better than their predecessors?
Output: Valid