Hi Marilyn, I am helping a friend plan an "away" wedding. I was wondering if you knew of or would suggest any resorts that have full wedding services that we can start looking at. They want simple wedding and are going to invite their close family and friends, but are not sure who will be able to come yet. I am thinking it will probably be about 10 people. They definitely want something tropical and probably all-inclusive would be best. I had a friend who got married in Playa de Carmen, but I'm not sure which resort. I was thinking somewhere in Mexico would be good but definitely not Cancun. They are on a tight budget because they will be paying for it themselves. So here are the details about what we are looking for: Tropical All-Inclusive Resort Round trip airfare Travel date between November 2001 and January 2002 (what time is cheaper?) Wedding Services including someone to perform the ceremony, flowers for the bride, photography, location for ceremony (possibly on the beach), location for reception for about 10 people (can be restaurant at the resort)
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Help with wedding plans!
I am currently working on a form for the master netting without the CSA. It is somewhat complicated--so if you have such a request, please await the new form. Do not try to do it yourself. Thank you.
Answer: Master Netting Without Margin/Collateral Provisions
IN: This is an email
HELP STOP THE SHIFT OF OVER $600 MILLION OF POWER COSTS FROM S. CALIFORNIA TO N. AND CENTRAL CALIFORNIA RATEPAYERS. Please call the PUC at 415 703 2074 to voice your opposition to this unfair plan. Details and talking points are below. *********** According to the California Public Utilities Commission's (CPUC) draft decision on the California Department of Water Resources?s (DWR) revenue requirement (attached), the CPUC is proposing to shift over $600 million of unreviewed DWR power costs to PG&E?s customers from Southern California customers. If adopted by the CPUC, this would lock PG&E customers into 40-55 percent higher rates for DWR power over the next 10 years, compared to customers of Southern California Edison and SDG&E. It discriminates against PG&E?s customers and has not been subject to public review, due process, or cost justification by DWR or the CPUC. The CPUC has postponed the vote on the DWR cost shifting issue until later this month (Sept 20th, or sooner). Without a full public hearing at which all the cost and ratemaking issues can be aired, Northern and Central California customers will not have a full and fair opportunity to review DWR ?s multi-billion dollar rate demands and will be unable to influence these proceedings. The SVMG is strongly urging you to call the CPUC as well as your local legislators (contact information attached) to gain their support in opposing this unjustified and discriminatory rate shift. Main issues of concern are: 1)the unfair shift of over $600 million in costs from SCE customers to PG&E customers; 2)imposes higher Direct Access exit fees in Northern CA. than in Southern CA. ; 3)appears to fund a portion of SCE's debt repayment on the backs of PG&E customers without any justification from the CPUC (please find further talking points attached). We are asking that the CPUC conduct open public hearings so that public comment can be provided, and the DWR's basis for cost recovery can be reviewed. Thank you for your prompt support in this crucial effort.

What is the subject?

OUT:
VERY URGENT - $600million Cost Shifting to PG&E Customers