Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: We are in agreement. But what does it matter if one is dealt with before the other, particularly since the campus policy effects thousands every day, staff, students, and visitors, while the capitol might see a few hundreds a year? The perfect is the enemy of the good, it is perfectly valid to remove restrictions one step at a time.

That is, after all, how we went from no legal carry in '93 to permitless in '04. One improvement at a time.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Hey so the person commenting under the name opinions why dont u go fuck yourself. Because were u there when she died? Instead of coming and offering rumors and insults on my friend whos dead show some respect and offer some condolences. She may have not been makin the best choices but in no way asked for or deserved what happened.U still have a voice. She doesnt. R.i.p courtney funk. And opinions- get bent
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: By grabthar's hammer, you shall be avenged!
[EX A]:
Yes