Problem: Write an article based on this summary: Make it clear that you aren't arguing that abortion is a wonderful procedure full of sunshine and rainbows. Mention the United Nations (UN)'s position on pregnancy and torture. Point out double standards regarding bodily autonomy in government. Discuss cases in which abortion could protect the pregnant person from severe harm or even death. Mention the pregnant person's future. Examine whether they have a middle ground.

Answer: Being pro-choice does not necessarily mean hating babies or coercing people into terminating a pregnancy. It is about allowing people to evaluate their own situations, think hard, and then choose what is best in their unique circumstances. Mention how abortion centers will interview the patient to ensure that they are not being pushed or manipulated into the abortion. One Planned Parenthood ex-volunteer describes being trained on how to give resources (e.g. rehab brochures, information on subsidized childcare) to someone who said that they wanted to keep their pregnancy but didn't think they could. "Choice" includes choosing to keep and love a fetus. Pregnancy involves around nine months of difficult or debilitating symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, bloating, cravings, exhaustion, and more. The UN has classified forcing a pregnant person to continue a pregnancy against their will as torture. For example, in most countries, vital organs cannot be harvested from a corpse without the dead person's prior consent. If corpses are allowed to control organs that could save lives, while pregnant people cannot control their uteruses, then a pregnant person has less bodily rights than a corpse. Some pregnancies, such as tubal pregnancies, are ticking time bombsthe fetus faces certain death and the pregnant person could be harmed too. These people should have the right to safety. Aborting a fetus before it naturally miscarries, and being kind about it, can save the pregnant person a lot of pain and danger to health (especially if the dying fetus was wanted and loved). Ask if causing both pregnant person and fetus to die is pro-life. Ask if they believe the birth of an unwanted child to a young, promising person would hinder their life. Of course it will: it'll cause financial expense, increased stress, enormous medical bills (if they lack adequate insurance), and other hardships. Ask: Is it ethical to force this upon someone who never asked for it? Not all pregnant people consented to sexrape victims didn't, and some pregnant people were too young to consent to sex (e.g. 13-year-old girls). Even if the sex that led to pregnancy was consensual, consent to one thing does not automatically translate to equal consent to another. Many people may not fully comprehend the implications of their actions. Thus, why would consent to sex be viewed as consent to pregnancy and childbirth? Around of people who get abortions say they could not afford a(nother) child. Is the pro-life person supporting programs that would help low-income families? Discuss the health issues that can result from pregnancy. Mental health issues such as depression and postpartum PTSD are more likely to occur in people who endured an unwanted pregnancy. Pregnancy and childbirth can also cause permanent physical damage. They may argue exceptions of rape, incest, pregnant children/teens, dead or dying fetuses, et cetera. Ask what makes these cases so different. Continue examining different cases, and they'll begin to realize that abortion is far more than black and white. For rape/incest exceptions, point out that this isn't about a "right to life" at all then, because a fetus created from rape is no less alive than a fetus created from consensual sex. It is about punishing the pregnant person (often a woman) for consenting to sex. For "pro-need" type beliefs, point out that this is the foundation of the pro-choice movement: that if the pregnant person feels their individual case is serious, then they should be able to abort. Shake their hand and say you wholeheartedly agree.

Problem: Write an article based on this summary: Bake your dry ingredients. Prepare your wet ingredients. Combine wet and dry and then bake again.

Answer: Set your oven to 300 degrees Fahrenheit (149 degrees Celsius). While that heats up, break any large pretzels or bagel chips into bite-size pieces. Line two cookie sheets with parchment paper and spread your pretzels, chips, nuts, and Chex across those. When the oven's ready, place the cookie sheets inside and bake for 15 minutes. Place your butter in a large, ungreased roasting pan and stick that into the oven with the dry ingredients. Watch over it and remove once the butter melts. Then add your Worcestershire sauce, salt, garlic powder, and onion powder, plus any other seasonings that you care to use. Stir to combine. Once the dry ingredients have baked for 15 minutes, lower the oven to 250 degrees F (121 Celsius). Transfer the dry goods from the cookie sheets to the roasting pan. Stir them into the wet mixture until they're evenly coated. Then, when the oven has reached its new temperature, put the roasting pan in. Check and stir every 15 minutes until they're done. Since you already baked the dry goods once, the second bake may take less time than the full hour that's usually needed for a one-time bake. The mix should brown like toast when it's ready.

Problem: Write an article based on this summary: Shrug off speculation of "How would you feel if your mom aborted you? Remind them that being pro-choice is not anti-family. Point out inherent flaws in disaster comparisons. Dismiss speculations about what the fetus could have been. Point out the hypocrisy (and bad manners) of showing graphic abortion pictures. Don't validate any extremely hypothetical points.

Answer: " Explain that you wouldn't have feelings because you wouldn't exist, and that people can give birth while supporting others' right not to. You may wish to add that you love your mother and wouldn't want her to endure nine months of a forced pregnancy. No one is disputing that a wanted, loved pregnancy is a beautiful thing. Pro-choice people support a person's ability to choose what happens inside their body. (This is why the position is called pro-choice and not pro-rampant-abortion.) The death of an unwanted fetus is not the same as genocide, slavery, or the murder of an autonomous person. (A fetus or embryo, unlike a human being, is using another person's body in order to exist.) If they point out that murdering disabled people and children is wrong, and disabled/young people may not be autonomous, the key is that any caregivers consent to caring for that person. (For example, an autistic person's caregiver chose that job and can quit at any time.) Many Jewish people don't appreciate pro-life groups comparing abortion to the Holocaust. The fetus could have cured cancer, yes... or it could have been a serial killer (which is statistically more likely). One could imagine all sorts of things, but none of it is relevant to the point of human rights. Heart surgery and the removal of tumors are also graphic procedures, yet those aren't automatically evil. Furthermore, gore can trigger phobias, PTSD, and other awful reactions, so it's not exactly a kind thing to shove in strangers' faces. Don't let someone base their point entirely off of something that would never happen. For example, if someone said "What if everybody got an abortion?", point out that there are many people who continue the pregnancy and that this is not realistic. This isn't the same as other points such as "What if somebody was raped?", as there are many rape victims who receive abortions.

Problem: Write an article based on this summary: Understand the economic factors. Understand the role of education. Research organizations.

Answer:
Before we can take action, we need to understand what leads to child labor. In many impoverished countries, children make up nearly half the labor force. Sometimes families need their children to work and help pay household expenses, and employers take advantage of this desperation by forcing children to work long hours in hazardous conditions for low pay and no rights. One of the root causes of child labor is poor or corrupt schools and a "lack of earning during learning." Most basically defined, "lack of earning during learning" means that children are not earning money while they are attending school; this lack of earning and the need for families to earn more money results in school dropout. Improving access to quality education is one way to intervene and help stop child labor. Use the internet to find out which organizations support anti-child labor initiatives. Browse their mission statements and events pages to get a sense of their stance on the issues, and how they plan to help exploited children workers. Here are a couple of websites to start with: United Nations Children's Fund UNICEF The Stop Child Labor Coalition International Initiative to End Child Labor National Child Labor Committee International Program on the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC)