In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: It's like the track. Go to one at the end of the day and you see people sitting, in shock, holding well-thumbed tickets that no matter how much they check and recheck them, are not giving them back their last $20. And now how to get home? Call their daughter and explain, again, how they were so close this time? A voluntary tax on the poor who pay for my fancy new hockey facility. Water on the bench! It's atrocious.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: "Santa Barbara feel." You mean walkable, well kept sidewalks. Livable, nice even. Not the dumping ground for homeless drug addicts and prostitutes that it looks like now. The Ammo Can has enough parking. I never see that lot full. I do see all the snow from that lot pushed in the way of any one on a bike or walking.

People in Anchorage need to get off their butts and walk to a business. Their doctors will be happier, and they will be healthier.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Fat people should not get government health coverage, same with smokers. If you are fat or a smoker automatically you lose coverage until you drop your weight down to an acceptable level or if you are a smoker - you quit. There are also ways to see if a person is cheating, for fatty it is obvious but doctors can tell if a person smokes or not and the police can register smokers when they see them outside puffing away.

Never mind more taxes this will do it and unless they get with the program Fatty and Puffy will kick the bucket in jig time.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit