IN: This is an email
Hi, Steve: We am preparing a form of assignment from ECT Investments, Inc. in favor of Enron North America Corp. whch will transfer several credit derivative Transactions. I anticipate an attachment to the assignment which will identify the trades. I believe that Bill Bradford (Ernon) and Mark Tarkington have discussed these trades and Bill is sending me the list. Please let me know that you are aware of this request. Thanks.

What is the subject?

OUT: Assignment of trades
QUESTION: I found a mistake in the first Excel spreadsheet when discussing with Kim Kouri. Cost Estimate Summary sheet (2nd tab) did not add all of the rows down for the San Juan portion. The attached was corrected. It made a difference of $5,000,000 total project cost. Ron M.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Sun Devil Project - Level B Request "REVISED"
EPMI is entering into more and more transactions that are settled against a floating, published index price. Our physical contract does not currently provide for what happens if the published source is not available or is otherwise materially changed. Under ISDA for financial trading, this is addressed as a Market Disruption Event (MDE). Under ENA's standard contract for financial trading, there is included as a MDE "the imposition of trading limits on the range within which the price of the commodity may fluctuate". What this may mean is that if a cap is imposed on power prices, then in lieu of using the capped price to determine the floating price, you would be required (under ISDA) to eventually get brokers to determine what the price would have been without the cap. I want to add language to our physical contracts that addresses material changes/disappearance of the published prices that would mirror the financial trading terms and doubt whether we would want to make the imposition of a cap on power prices a MDE. If you treat the imposition of a cap (say in CA of prices to $500 or in NEPOOL to $1,000) as a MDE, then we would be required to secure quotes as to what the price would have been without the cap each time that a pricing date trades at the cap level. This only seems fraught with litigation risk to me. Alternatively, if caps are not deemed a MDE, then you would always settle against the published prices, even if they are "artificially" determined after the trade was entered into. While caps are not appealing, I think it would be better to not have the imposition of caps be considered a MDE. I have spoken with the financial trading group and they will follow our lead on this. So, depending upon what you both think, we will make sure that financial and physical power are treated the same on this issue. Thanks for your thoughts.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Index Transactions
Current Notes User: To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook, it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of migration. Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following survey. Double Click on document to put it in "Edit" mode. When you finish, simply click on the 'Reply With History' button then hit 'Send' Your survey will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox. Thank you.
Answer: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL 5-17-01
Here is an email: Gerald, Have you gotten a chance to look over the ROW document? It seems to be a pretty standard agreement. If possible, we would like to get this finalized soon. Once we hit the middle of Dec, it will probably be harder to get anything done. Let me know if you have any questions on the agreement. Thanks,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: ROW agreement
QUESTION: I'm losing my mind. Did I already forward this note to you? Do you still need the confirmation information? I can print out whatever they have stored in Livelink, or you can contact Stephanie - it looks like she has what you were searching for. Thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
deal 3689