The man could be talking to anyone not just his apprentice and they might not be going to rob the place.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "A man wearing a brown t-shirt and blue jeans is standing in front of a chanel store holding a walkie talkie." can we conclude that "A man contacts his apprentice by walkie talkie as they prepare to rob a store."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
Just because police are escorting someone does not mean it is because they are irate.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "Some policemen escort demonstrating citizens."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The citizens are irate." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
The workers would not be picketing against the company while yelling how much they love them.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "Construction workers picketing against pm construction services."
Hypothesis: "Construction workers are in the streets yelling how much they love and appreciate pm construction services."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
no
The man can't be wearing a red helmet and a fedora at the same time.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A man in a red helmet has water squirted in his mouth by another man in a boxing ring."
Hypothesis: "A man in a fedora."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
no
The snowboarder is not necessarily a professional snowboarder doing warm up activities for a main event.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A person sits on a snowbank watching a snowboarder take a high leap."
Hypothesis: "A spectator watches a professional snowboarder warm up for the main event."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell
A sculptor of a topless woman reaching upwards is attached to a flat wall of a building with a row of barred doors at the ground level is identical to A sculptor of a topless woman reaching upwards is attached to a flat wall of a building with a row of barred doors at the ground level.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:
Given the sentence "A sculptor of a topless woman reaching upwards is attached to a flat wall of a building with a row of barred doors at the ground level." can we conclude that "A sculptor of a topless woman reaching upwards is attached to a flat wall of a building with a row of barred doors at the ground level."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes