Question:
Based on the premise "In terms of the purposes of the study-finding out what was stressful to the women and why the incidence of mental health problems among them was so high-the case study method disclosed the importance of any change in life circumstances as a source of stress rather than merely confirming change that the observers might have thought stressful a priori.", can we conclude that "Finding out what was calming to the women was important to the study."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: IRS spent more than $3 billion in the late 1980s and early 1990s on systems modernization without producing commensurate value.

Sentence B: The IRS spent $2 billion.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Most of this coast, though, is filling with hotels, villas, and apartment blocks.
The views are being blocked by all the high rise buildings for accommodation that are being built.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
The Sinai is a wild and dramatically beautiful land pointing south out into the Red Sea.

Here is a hypothesis:
Sinai is a desolate and barren landscape with no surrounding seas.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: outside of Boston

Sentence 2: Beyond Boston.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"Coincidentally, this is precisely what Naomi Wolf advised Al Gore to do, advice for which he was paying her $15,000 a month."
Hypothesis: Naomi wolf's advice is worth $15,000 because she has access to the thoughts of god.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell