Q: Hi Paul Thomas, Welcome to The Princeton Review's Online Companion Tools! You're on your way to getting higher test scores - and getting into your first choice school. Below is some important information to help you use the course. Be sure to save this email for future reference. LOGGING IN Just point your browser at www.PrincetonReview.com and click on "Sign In." In the next window, click on "Sign In" under "Test Prep." Enter your username & password & click Enter. Then click on the Online Companion Tools link to get started. For your records, here are the username and password you selected when you registered: USERNAME: paul.d.thomas@enron.com PASSWORD: qy1qwlih Please note that you will have access to your Online Companion Tools for a period of 120 days from today. If you plan on accessing your tools from multiple machines you'll need to make sure each is configured properly by running our requirements check, which is available through a link after you log in. LOGGING OUT If you are using a public computer, like one in a library or dorm, it's a very good idea to log out every time you finish your work on the website. All you have to do is click on the Exit link that appears at the right end of the toolbar along the bottom of your tools dashboard. TECHNICAL SUPPORT Tech support is available at no charge to all Princeton Review Online Companion Tools users Monday through Friday from 7am until 1am EST and Saturday and Sunday from 8am to 8pm EST. You can reach tech support by phone or e-mail:
Propose a subject line
A: Your username and password for www.PrincetonReview.com

Q: All, At our offsite in Miami next week, each of you are on the agenda to present your business and goals. This will be very short, only 20 minutes (an agenda will soon follow but we will have a business meeting from 8am - 11:30am on Saturday). Please prepare a few of pages on power point and submit to Cathy Phillips so that she can have all the presentations ready for that Saturday morning. Attached below is a copy of the abbreviated goals that I submitted to Frevert, summarizing EGM's 2001 goals. Please do not hesitate to change the list and add to it, it is only a guide and was used as a quick reference of EGM for the Enron board. After this meeting, I will take each of your presentations and make a more comprehensive goals and objectives list for EGM as a business unit. Also please add some of your other specific goals that illustrate where you want to be by year end regarding your competitive position and/or market share. For example, to be the largest marketer of coal in the US, to be the largest options player in crude and products, or what ever is appropriate. Also attached, for your information, is a recent presentation from the coal group. We thought that this was an excellent format and review. In the upcoming weeks, we would like to see an update on each of your businesses as well. I will let you know more in the next few weeks about the timing and format. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: Offsite and 2001 goals

Q: In todays meeting the CPUC did NOT act on the Revised Proposed Decision issued last week to unbundle the SoCal system. Once again the decision has been Held Over to the next meeting. gh
Propose a subject line
A: SoCal GIR/Unbundling

Q: Lucy: Tana tells me you are looking for some guidance as to which Enron entity should be used for booking trading transactions with various counterparties. There are a couple of general rules that apply to "normal" trading circumstances and I'll spell them out below, but remember that these are not hard and fast rules and may go straight out the window when circumstances vary (even just a little bit) from "normal." For example, abnormal situations exist where the trading transaction is in connection with another transaction with an Enron company (e.g. a financing or equity investment), the counterparty has a legally justifiable desire to trade with a certain Enron company, the product being traded is only traded by a particular Enron company or the counterparty is in a jurisdiction outside the country where we are trading (except as spelled out below). Having said all that, the following rules (generally tax driven) can be used as general guidelines: 1. If there is no master agreement in place between the counterparty and an Enron company, the trade should be entered into on behalf of the Enron company based in the country where the Enron trader is when the trade is concluded and, if there is any hope of further trading with the counterparty, Credit and Legal should be notified to negotiate a master agreement. Of course, if the counterparty is outside the country where we are trading, Legal should be consulted ahead of time (there are some countries where derivatives are actually illegal, special procedures must be followed or can't be done by us from the U.S.). 2. If there is a master agreement between the counterparty and either ENA or Enron Canada, and the Enron trader is in the U.S. or Canada, the trade should be entered into by the trader on behalf of the Enron company that is party to the master agreement. If the trader is outside of the U.S. or Canada, other rules may apply. 3. If there is a master agreement between the counterparty and ECT International (usually only European counterparties), and the Enron trader is in the U.S. or the U.K., the trade should be entered into by the trader on behalf of ECT International. Note that there are special considerations if the trader is in the U.K. based on U.K. regulatory issues (the trade is actually "arranged" by Enron Europe Finance and Trading Ltd. on behalf of ECT International). If such a master exists but the trader is not in the U.S. or U.K., the trade should be handed off to a trader located in one of those two countries for final negotiation and execution. It would be a good idea to consult with Legal or Tax if this comes up for more specific advice. These general rules relate to which Enron entity should be the legal counterparty to the transactions. This doesn't determine where within the Enron family the actual risk should ultimately reside. If we want the risk to be in an Enron company other than the Enron counterparty for contractual purposes, an intercompany transaction should be booked (probably through RMT) to get the risk in the right place.
Propose a subject line
A:
Enron Entity for Financial Trading