You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Why? This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

New input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Ensuring Meaningful Petition
Outreach While Enhancing Rights of States Act of 2018'' or the
''EMPOWERS Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. GREATER COUNTY AND STATE INVOLVEMENT.

(a) County and State Consultation on Petitions.--Section 4(b)(3) of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(3)) is amended by
adding at the end the following:
''(E) Listing petition review requirements.--
''(i) Not later than 30 days before
submitting to the Secretary a petition to list,
delist, or reclassify a species that occurs in
the United States, or to revise a designation
of critical habitat of such a species, the
petitioner shall provide to the chief executive
of each county and State in which the species
is located a notice of intent to submit such
petition.
''(ii) The Secretary shall, upon finding
that a petitioned action to list a species as a
threatened species or endangered species may be
warranted, solicit from the chief executive of
each county and State in which the species is
located--
''(I) information regarding
threats to the species and
efforts by the county or State,
respectively, to protect the
species;
''(II) information about
the anticipated effects of the
action requested in the
petition in that county or
State, respectively; and
''(III) the advice of the
chief executive on whether the
status of the species merits
the action requested in the
petition, including information
in support of such advice.
''(iii) The Secretary may verify by field
testing the information presented in a petition
asserting that a species is a threatened
species or endangered species.
''(iv) If a chief executive advises under
clause (ii)(III) that the petitioned-for action
is not warranted, the Secretary may not proceed
with the action unless the Secretary
demonstrates that information submitted in
support of such advice by the chief executive
is incorrect and that the action is
warranted.''.
(b) Regulations To Implement Determinations.--Section 4(b)(5) of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(5)) is amended to
read as follows:
''(5) Notice required.--With respect to any regulation
proposed by the Secretary to implement a determination referred
to in subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall--
''(A) not less than 90 days before the effective
date of the regulation--
''(i) publish a general notice and the
complete text of the proposed regulation in the
Federal Register;
''(ii) provide notice of the proposed
regulation (including the complete text of the
regulation) to the chief executive of county
and State in which the species is located, and
invite such chief executive to submit to the
Secretary a determination as to whether the
proposed regulation is warranted; and
''(iii) if the chief executive notifies the
Secretary that the proposed regulation is not
warranted, provide to the chief executive a
record of decision for such determination,
including information made available to the
Secretary that did not support the
determination and in writing the reasons for
the determination;
''(B) in cooperation with the Secretary of State,
provide notice of the proposed regulation to each
foreign nation in which the species is located or whose
citizens harvest the species on the high seas, and
invite the comment of such nation thereon;
''(C) provide notice of the proposed regulation
to--
''(i) each person who requests such notice;
''(ii) each person who has submitted
additional data on the proposed regulation;
''(iii) each county, State, and local
government within the jurisdiction of which the
species is located or that is likely to
experience any effects of any measures to
protect the species under this Act; and
''(iv) such professional scientific
organizations as the Secretary considers
appropriate;
''(D) publish a summary of the proposed regulation
on the internet; and
''(E) promptly hold one public hearing on the
proposed regulation if any person files a request for
such a hearing within 45 days after the date of
publication of general notice.''.
(c) Consultation on Final Determination.--Section 4(i) of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533(i)) is amended to read
as follows:
''(i) Written Justification.--If the Secretary adopts a final
regulation in conflict with advise submitted by the chief executive of
a county or State or fails to adopt a regulation pursuant to an action
petitioned for by such a chief executive under subsection (b)(3), the
Secretary shall submit to the chief executive--
''(1) a separate written justification explaining the
failure of the Secretary to adopt regulations consistent with
the advise or petition of the chief executive;
''(2) any determination referred to in subsection (a)(1)
relating to the regulation; and
''(3) all comments received by the Secretary that disagreed
with all or part of the regulation.''.
(d) FACA.--Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16
U.S.C. 1533(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
''(9) FACA.--Consultation with counties and States
regarding petitions and proposed regulations under this
subsection shall not be subject to the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).''.
Solution:
Ensuring Meaningful Petition Outreach While Enhancing Rights of States Act of 2018 or the EMPOWERS Act of 2018 This bill amends the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to revise the process for listing, delisting, or reclassifying a species under the Act. Before submitting to the Department of the Interior or the Department of Commerce, as appropriate, a petition to list a species as a threatened or endangered species, the petitioner must notify each county and state in which the species is located of the intent to submit a petition. Upon finding that the petition may be warranted, the appropriate department must solicit advice from each county and state in which the species is located. If a state or county advises that the listing is not warranted, then the appropriate department may not proceed with the listing unless the department demonstrates that the information submitted in support of the advice is incorrect and that the listing is warranted. The bill expands requirements regarding providing notice of a proposed regulation that determines whether a species is endangered or threatened, including by requiring the appropriate department to provide notice to each person who requests a notice. The appropriate department must justify a final regulation that conflicts with the advice of a state or county.