Problem: Here is a premise:
Dudovitz acknowledged that the acrimonious transition may not have been ideal for clients but said the range of services now available to them will more than compensate for any lapse of services.

Here is a hypothesis:
There exist fewer lapse in service than there once was.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: He is opportunistic.

Sentence 2: He grabbed the opportunity to work for the company.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
We will meet him tomorrow," said Jon.

Does it follow that "Jon told me we'll meet him tomorrow."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If mechanical beast but uh they haven't lost their seal yet so it's i guess there's a quality some quality in it, can we say that "There's no quality in it"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"They drank that.""
Hypothesis: he ate that.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: The castle contains an interesting but disappointingly modern museum displaying armor, weapons, costumes, and historical documents.

Sentence 2: The museum in the castle has armor and weapons.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes