Q: Darrell, Grant just alerted me that I sent you only part of the text. Here is the full chapter with an aged version of Gran't part. What I sent you represents an update of his contribution. Sorry for that. Vince
Propose a subject line
A: Full version
IN: Mark As per my voicemail, I am working as part of a team implementing financial trading agreements with our intra group counterparties. Part of that process involves contacting the directors of each enterprise and clarifying certain pieces of information. Could I ask that you confirm the following regarding RMTC - Global Markets and Enron Metals and Commodities Corp That you are a director, and therefore authorised signatories of the companies? Would your signature be required on any new trading agreement for both companies? Would there need to be a corporate resolution in order to sign the new trading agreement? Thanking you very much in advance for your time, Best Regards

Generate a subject line.

OUT: RMTC - Global Markets and Enron Metals & Commodities Corp
IN: This is an email
The meeting Don and I had with Kinder/Morgan to discuss his Price Risk Management Product went really well. We met with Park Schaper (CFO), Anthony Lannie (President of Power Group) and Jay Hopper (VP and General Manager) was on the phone from Denver. They were very interested with regards to potentially replacing long term tolling agreements with this product. Enron could provide a five year toll and the product would begin in the sixth year through year 15 or 20. We talked very little about their existing projects; Little Rock and Michigan. They do have all the permits for the Little Rock site and are moving forward with the Michigan site and still do not have any tolling agreements in place for those projects. The ball is currently in their court and were going to get back with Scot with respects to the projects and with Tom on the PRM Product. Please let me know if you have any questions with this matter. Thanks! Ben

What is the subject?

OUT: Kinder/Morgan PRM Structure
QUESTION: I also noticed the ISDA memo, and was rooting around looking for the attachments that went with it, and couldn't find them. There was also a few updates in a second memo there to some country opinions. If and when Mark calls in I was going to ask him if he knows where the attachments went, because the one will cost $100 if we have to order it.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: ISDA Documents
Here is a good example of the problem to which your research project pertains. This info. could be devastating in the next rate case ( or sooner) if disclosed. How comfortable are we with our privilege arguments? DF
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: The memo
The doorstep audit is not yet complete as I'm having about 25 or so deals "tested" out of the Long Beach office. We should know all final results within the next week or so. Rick-your suggestions are generally on target as we have already begun the process for pulling each specific office's information together-ie: how many offices do we have, who are the specific people in them, what do they transact on (DSM, gas/power commodity, services mgmt., etc), and can we consolidate/minimize the number of offices we have. For example, of the 87-ish offices that we currently have EES folks in, only 14 of those offices have individuals that transact gas or power deals in the EnronDirect sales group (ie: customers below $10 million in energy spend) and there are @ 45 sales folks in these 14 offices. The losses now expected out of the Long Beach office are MUCH lower than initial estimates. If anyone would like to review, please call me directly. We are already well underway in establishing new transaction process' for both gas and power deals. Although we have already put in place and communicated these new procedures to each of the sales offices, we are putting together a "sales package" that will encompass each of the new procedures in detail, each of the new gas and power contracts and rules for use, and a new sales policy which will review in detail the responsibilities for each sales individual. This policy will require signatures from the sales folks in order for them to continue working for EES in a sales transaction role. We are also exploring an independent verification process whereby we would have someone from either Deal Capture or Deal Management actually contact the customer to confirm the transaction. The "McDonald's Hamburger" analogy is quite appropriate here! Just wanted to let everyone know what was already underway.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Remote Offices- Suggestions