Detailed Instructions: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
See one example below:
Problem: Comment: i am just sorry that khadr didnt get a bullet in the head before he blew the head off that innocent father because his islamic boogie skywizard told him to.
Solution: Toxic
Explanation: This is a toxic comment because it advocates acts of violence.

Problem: Comment: I appreciate your thoughtful response. I must contest your terms, however, as they mean everything. The fundamental issue that has you and others here perplexed, is that though disagree as he does with his church on women in leadership and marriage equality Jules Bailey doesn't seem to think his fellow members are either misogynistic or homophobic. That is, he must not believe the members and leadership of Imago Dei hate or mistreat women and they don't fear or mistreat homosexuals. What if this is actually true? The progressive community is now far too exclusive and refuses to hear the opinions and perspectives of people it disagrees with. Its group think. And...fear.

Let the man believe what he wants, and worship where he will. What a majority on here are saying is that he's a viable candidate except he hangs out with undesirables...people who believe (peacefully, without controversy) counter to the majority. This runs counter to self-purported progressive Portland values.
Solution:
Non-toxic