Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: This is just further proof that the Malheur occupiers are all mentally ill people. These are clearly the acts of an unbalanced person. They need to all either be locked up in prison, or become a patient at a secure mental hospital.

Just look at this image of Scott Willingham taken during the occupation. Just look at all of the powerful weapons that he is armed with. And take a look at the absolutely crazed look on his face. That is clearly the face of a very dangerous insane maniac.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CZs_cRHWEAE0-4Q.jpg

Willingham is homeless, and has been living out of his pickup truck for a long time. He was still in his home state of Texas when the occupation started. Although only 48, he admitted to the news media during the occupation that he had not worked in a long time.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: The last time we had a little violence in an election year it was Mayor Daley's thugs beating protester's during a Democratic Convention in Chicago.

"Outside the official convention proceedings, anti-war demonstrators clashed with 11,900 Chicago police, 7500 Army troops, 7500 Illinois National Guardsmen and 1000 Secret Service agents over 5 days."

These are just scuffles.

You can't have a Real riot without Democrats.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: And of course being so ethical you opted to keep the overage remaining after you bought your three squares a day and loved that TDY because you generally increased your take home three or four hundred a week.

Right?
Example Output:
No