ENA is selling the Power Gas Marketing pool gas behind East Ohio (10,000/month) to EES for the month of July. EES has the ability to take this gas for the term of the deal (through Oct 2000). I told Marde we would talk about that after the 4th. EES will nominate this gas directly from Power's pool, so Heidi does not need to be involved at all. Heidi, it looks like this pool can be terminated. Peoples, for July ENA is selling 430/day to Clinton Energy (Latrobe). Heidi is working on that. Heidi also informed me yesterday that CES was terminating the Peoples pool effective 8/1/2000. I suggested that we may need to transfer the pool to ENA, because there will still be activity in August due to the Latrobe fuel credit. However, we may be able to transfer any balances to EES effectve 8/1/2000. Hopefully, we can talk about this after the 4th. Let me know if anyone has any questions.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: EOG for July, Peoples
Have tax problems? Do you owe the IRS money? If your debt is $10,000 US or more, we can help! Our licensed agents can help you with both past and present tax debt. We have direct contacts with the IRS, so once your application is processed we can help you immediately without further delay. Also, as our client we can offer you other services and help with other problems. Our nationally recognized tax attorneys, paralegals, legal assistants and licensed enrolled agents can help you with: - Tax Preparation - Audits - Seizures - Bank Levies - Asset Protection - Audit Reconsideration - Trust Fund Penalty Defense - Penalty Appeals - Penalty Abatement - Wage Garnishments .. and more! To receive FREE information on tax help, please fill out the form below and return it to us. There are no obligations, and supplied information is kept strictly confidential. Please note that this offer only applies to US citizens. Application processing may take up to 10 business days. Note: For debt size please also include any penalties or interest ********** Full Name: State: Phone Number: Time to Call: Estimated Tax Debt Size: ********** Thank you for your time.
Answer: Have Tax Problems? [o8ul9]
Here is an email: Mark: I left you voice mail last week regarding a due authorization opinion from ENA to Statoil (for execution of a master). Will you or Haedicke sign? Also, who signs an enforceability opinion (under either NY or Texas law)? Thanks. Sara
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: legal opinion
Q: This is a notice to inform you that the server where your Outlook mailbox resides is scheduled for an outage tonight. Your mailbox will be temporarily unavailable starting anytime after 11pm and may continue to be unavailable until 1 a.m., when all server maintenance work have been completed. Outlook Web Access (OWA) will also be unavailable during this time. Blackberry users: Message delivery may be delayed for a few minutes. If you have any questions, please call the Resolution Center at x31411.
Propose a subject line
A: CORRECTION: Outlook Outage - Friday, December 28, 2001
IN: The invoices for August 2001 settlements were posted by 10:42 AM today, Saturday, September 8, 2001. The NYISO apologizes for any inconvenience resulting in posting these invoices a day after they were scheduled. The Customer Settlements group makes every effort to render accurate invoices on a timely basis. Although issued a day after their scheduled posting, the invoices are still being issued within the 5-business days. {I'd forgotten about Labor Day when I set up the schedule.} Transmission Customers will observe adjustments for an error on in May 2000 Settlement Adjustment invoices that were issued in July. The total adjustment amounted to $2,081,568.11 and was allocated across 2,261,753.08 MWh. Customers may validate their respective adjustments by computing their ratio shares of the $2,081,568.11 using 2,261,753 MWh as the denominator in their respective ratios of their May 2000 load. The reason the denominator of the ratio share appears small is because the pay out of this adjustment is to the Transmission Owners. In order not to assess the TO's a proportionate share of the $2,081,568.11, which would defeat the purpose of the adjustment, their withdrawals have been excluded from the ratio share. Transmission Owners should observe a credit on their invoices based upon their respective megawatt-mile coefficients for the period. With regard to the November 1999 & December 1999 settlement adjustments that were scheduled to be issued on the 7th, the NYISO intends to issue those invoices next week. The issuance dates will ensure that customers will have at least 5 business days to review the invoices prior to payments being due to the NYISO. If necessary, the NYISO will reschedule settlement dates for these months should our reconciliations take longer to complete; however, we do not anticipate this at this time. In addition, I'd like to take this opportunity to clarify a point that I made in a TIE posting regarding the rebilling of the August 25th settlements. The initial billing runs for August 25th were done without considering ConEd's sub-zonal load. As a result, it appeared as though there was no load in the ConEd sub-zones on the 25th and all DAM purchases and bilateral transactions in those sub-zones were sold back to the market in real time causing the Schedule 1 residual adjustment to be grossly inflated. The reason this occurred was due to what appears to have been a frame relay problem between the NYISO & ConEd resulting in the NYISO not receiving a file from ConEd. By no means was my email notification of this event to imply that ConEd was not complying with the daily load provision process. This was merely a hardware/communications issue. Regards,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: August 2001 invoices
IN: This is an email
SK - we will forward the necessary information to him (the claim form). It's just not the same here without you. Happy New Years. Mo Steve, Happy holidays. It is hard to know where to begin except to say that we certainly have followed the Enron story closely. Not for the obvious business reasons, of course, but because people, like you, that we came to know and like were going through such difficulty. Naturally, we all hope that as 2002 arrives with it will come easier and better times and that ultimately this all plays out in a way that is good for you. You know that we very much enjoyed working with Enron and spared no effort to do the best job we could. For this reason, we were delighted when we received, prior to the announcement of Enron's bankruptcy a check for the final payment of our truncated agreement. However, that check has now bounced twice. We are a small company and while the payment was not immense, only $120K, it is still meaningful. Do you have any advice for us as to how we can get this check honored? Clearly, it was the intent to pay us and we are now caught in the system. Among the many things you must have to do, I know this is small. But to us it is large and if there is a way that you can help we would be most grateful. Many thanks and best wishes for the New Year, David

What is the subject?

OUT:
Greetings