input question: oh we had a frog strangler go sweeping sweeping through here uh yesterday and last night and we're expecting another one tonight If this premise is true, does that tell us:"A frog strangler has never been here."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "If she made a mistaken bet that her husband could reform, she is now in the position of a Siamese twin.", can we conclude that "She might have made a mistaken bet that her husband could reform."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: (We can add some side conditions that prohibit him from dealing with known terrorists and other undesirables.)

Sentence B: We should add rules to stop him from being in touch with known terrorists.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: While most of the published studies found positive (but not always significant) associations with available PM indices such as total suspended particles (TSP), fine particles components (i.e.
Positive associations were discovered by most of the published studies.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
he said, still looking at Tommy.

Here is a hypothesis:
He looked away from Tommy when he said it.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
Very little flourishes here perhaps a solitary acacia tree whose deep roots seek water deep below the surface but the odd desert fox will raise its long ears above the skyline, and you'll still see family groups of wild camels eking out an existence.

Does it follow that "There is a thriving ecosystem in this place. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no