Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: It is dangerous because it could be any number of things thrown together in a bag and called spice (think herbs d' provence, but also think meth, coke, heroin and all the horrible drugs full of all kinds of crap to cut it and make it travel further) and sold cheaper than cigarettes.
There's too many fools with no money out there and you can be sure 'fools' are selling something for almost nothing that has no real recipe or definition.

A: Yes
****
Q: Young sez: restrict the availability of information about environmental impact statements to individuals and entities, like tribes and state and local governments, who live in the "affected area." What kind of crap is that? Republican crap!

A: Yes
****
Q: I think we need another City Manager...perhaps the man
from Austin who applied for the job is still available. Austin
is such a beautiful city with award-winning community design.

I hope that The Council has started looking.

A:
No
****