Problem: Does the Minister of Canadian Heritage really think that increasing the tax write-off to 100% for corporate boxes, lowering the taxes sports millionaires pay to American levels, and writing off professional sports facilities in one year, which will cost hundreds of millions of dollars in lost tax revenues, will fly with Canadian taxpayers?

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The Minster of Canadian Heritage is in complete control of lowering and increasing taxes."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: It's impossible to say

Problem: That's fine. And I note that, and that's why I wanted to do this on the record. And I understand that you object to that, and I understand the defendants have interposed not only this objection but they have also argued against that. And to the extent that this really clarifies and reasserts what I have in my prior orders, I think you've preserved your position as it relates to that, and I understand that position.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "A pronoun is not used"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: No

Problem: LyndsayGill wrote: Combined Affiliated States. The players are drawn from local competitions in Northern Territory, South Australia, Victoria and Western Australia. So basically the equivalent of us sticking a 'best of NCL' side in against the Australian national team? Can't complain about the performance so far but not sure what anyone is learning from this.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The Australian National Team does not complete against other Australian teams. "? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A:
No