In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: These uncertainties can be reduced by careful consideration of the differences in the health risk or air pollution commodity and the study populations in the underlying economic literature versus the context of benefits conferred by the Clear Skies Act. Choices: 1. There is no way to reduce these uncertainties at this time. 2. Careful observation and studying of health risks by air pollution can help ease uncertainties. 3. The risk of air pollution is the most important type of pollution which should be carefully considered.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: i really was i was hoarse getting out of there and maybe i just laughed so hard the first time that i didn't have it i mean it just wasn't as funny the second time because i had just gone overboard the first time i don't know but Choices: 1. I couldn't stop laughing the first time I went through it. 2. I tried it a second time, and it wasn't as funny as the first time. 3. I have only tried it once, and I'm still to give it another try.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: National emission standards for affected units. Choices: 1. There are no standards for this kind of unit. 2. Affected units are subject to national emission standards. 3. National emission standards are very strict for units like these.
[EX A]:
1