Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: Well no. The Genie was freed. Therefore he had no more obligation to grant the wishes, regardless of whether Aladdin had any wishes left. If we are going to count the wishes though, the movie does count the saving from drowning as the second wish making freeing the Genie the third. This would have made the Nile wish pointless either way, since either the Genie was free to deny the wish as he was free, or he was free to deny it because it would have been the fourth wish. <sep> Q: Does the Genie trick Aladdin with the third wish? A: Well no. The Genie was freed Q: Does the Genie trick Aladdin into using his real last wish? A: he had no more obligation to grant the wishes, regardless of whether Aladdin had any wishes left Q: How many wishes did Aladin receive? A: If we are going to count the wishes though, the movie does count the saving from drowning as the second wish making freeing the Genie the third <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What about when Alladin tricks the Genie into getting him and Abu out of the cave where they are trapped?
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts' wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation. Only at the most distant point of the mission the conversation gaps reach 21 minutes. Thus, there seems to be no blooper nor plothole. (I am much more worried about the Apollo mission technology used for a journey of at least a year. Could three astronauts just sit in the command module most of the time? I guess even the strongest personalities would have gone mad. There might have been a strong extended/additional stage of a modified Saturn rocket for the outward and return journey. If this stage was equipped with extra rooms, stores etc. it would appear more realistic than what we see in the movie.) <sep> Q: How is the fluent conversation with spacecraft possible in Capricorn One? A: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts' wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How close was Capricorn One to earth?
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: My personal interpretation: I don't know how Siamese twins are like to each other in the real world but in the movie the relationship between the two lead characters are shown very strange yet interesting. After watching the movie, two things were stuck in my head about these two characters, Theo (Louis Garrel) and Isabelle (Eva Green). 1 - They both share common interest, that's passion for movies. Through out the movie you see snippets of french classic movies (that's what I think they are.) and they role-play them and they lay bets on those movies. 2 - At any cost, they don't leave each other. The movie made me say this line because, from beginning, they sleep nude next to each other, they bath together and even sexuality (the intercourse between Isabelle and Matthew in the kitchen.) they took liberally. So, I'm not surprised that Isabelle did not choose to leave with Matthew. Simply, Isabelle won't either leave her twin brother or the love for movies. <sep> Q: Why Isabelle and Theo leave Matthew in the end? A: Isabelle won't either leave her twin brother or the love for movies <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What is the cause of the riot?
[EX A]:
Yes