Problem: Here is a premise:
Somethin' 'bout this show's bad, plain as a black saddle on a white hoss.

Here is a hypothesis:
There's nothing wrong with this show, it looks authentic.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Applicants for permanent residence status as a rule are more restricted in their travel outside of the United States and must seek permission from the INS to travel or risk abandoning their application.

Sentence 2: People applying for permanent residence in the US are more restricted on international travel.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
No "but "

Does it follow that "Yes."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If well yeah but on the other hand if it if it needed his personal intervention all the time then it wasn't a good system anyway, can we say that "Changes were implemented to remove his involvement."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Mr. Carter must be warned."
Hypothesis: Do not warn Mr. Carter.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: Singapore became the capital of the Straits Settlements as the EIC called its Malay holdings incorporating Penang and Melaka and was the linchpin of Britain's 150-year presence in the region.

Sentence 2: Penang and Melaka would later seek a separate independence from the Straits Settlements.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell