Detailed Instructions: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Q: number of animals in an enclosed space made cat A209057 more susceptible to disease and chronic infection. The evidence showed that the bedroom containing approximately 50 cats smelled strongly of urine and feces and that the residence contained only four litter boxes. Many of the cats suffered infections. Cat A209057 suffered an infection so severe that it led to its demise. Although defendant may have believed that she was saving the stray cats from certain death, a reasonable person would understand that her actions caused cat A209057 to exist in an unsanitary environment where the cat became so sick that animal control personnel deemed it necessary to euthanize the animal. Common sense tells us that defendant's actions were inhumane. See Larson, 379 Ill. App. 3d at 650-51 (<HOLDING>). Thus, we determine that a person of ordinary
Holding statements: (A) holding because determination of guilt and whether mercy should be recommended should be made in one proceeding by the same jury petitioner is entitled to a new trial on the burglary charge (B) holding after bairesreyes was decided that 16b is void for vagueness in the context of the ina (C) holding that determination of whether someone is an employee under the adea must be made in accordance with common law agency principles (D) holding that in making a determination as to whether a statute is void for vagueness common sense should not be suspended and criminal acts cannot always be defined with absolute precision because of the limits of the english language (E) holding that common knowledge and common sense of one skilled in the art must be considered in determining obviousness
A:
holding because determination of guilt and whether mercy should be recommended should be made in one proceeding by the same jury petitioner is entitled to a new trial on the burglary charge