It has come to our attention that a group of employees missed their January 15th 401-K deduction. This was due to an incorrect employment status being fed by ENRON's SAP system to our 401-K vendor which resulted in your contribution amounts being defaulted to zero. Your 401-K contribution amounts were restored for the January 31, 2002 payroll. If you would like to have your contribution for the January 15, 2002 pay date taken on the February 28, 2002 pay date please respond by February 14, 2002. If we do not receive a response by February 14, 2002 we will assume that you have decided not to have a make up 401-K contribution for the one missed on January 15, 2002. We are trying to be sensitive to the possible hardship a double deduction could have on your personal financial situation. If you are not contributing the maximum percentage you could make an adjustment to your contribution percentage going forward to accomodate the missed January 15, 2002 contribution. As always we encourage all employees to review your investment elections to ensure they are consistent with your investment goals.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Employees who missed their 401-K contribution on the January 15, 2002 paycheck
Here is an action item list for the Duke LNG dispute. Items Responsible 1. Interview Witnesses Sanders/Rivera a. Rebecca McDonald b. Wayne Perry c. Transportation Witness d. Curve Witness 2. Send letter requesting information re economic hardship Rivera 3. Select arbitrator Sanders/Rivera a. Research regarding Mike Beatty Rivera 4. Compile documents/data for exchange of information Sanders/Hodge/Boyt 5. Confidentiality agreement for loss of supply information Sanders 6. Response to all outstanding correspondence from Duke's attorneys Rivera
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Duke LNG
Jim-I just wanted you to know that you are in my mind during these difficult times. I know how disappointing this all must be to you, but know that you have a lot of friends supporting you. Regards
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Thoughts
I understand that AA may not provide the review of interim financial information that the SEC requires to be obtained in respect of Form 10-Q filings ( Article 10 of Regulation SX). Jordan asked me to give an update in an hour about the impact of this on covenants in ENE credit and other instruments requiring delivery of ENE's 10Qs. (1) I have not yet been able to ascertain whether (i) the AA review or any statement in respect thereof is required to be filed with the SEC, or (ii) if not so required, ENE would file the 10-Q without having obtained the review. (2) ENE's 364-day corporate revolver (and most other ENE instruments containing the subject covenant) requires ENE to make available either on "EDGAR" or ENE's home page on World Wide Web, or otherwise make available to the Banks promptly after the filing or sending thereof, and in any event within 75 days after the end of each of the first three fiscal quarters, a copy of ENE's report on Form 10-Q. If ENE does not file the 10-Q, it arguably could nevertheless send it to the banks as confidential information (to comply with Regulation FD) within the required time period and satisfy the covenant. The revolver contains a confidentiality provision. Failure to deliver the 10-Q constitutes an Event of Default under the revolver if the failure continues for more than 30 days after ENE has received notice thereof by the Paying Agent. I will continue to pursue information from the accountants. Regards, NJD
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
ENE Form 10-Q Accounting Matter -- Initial Report