We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: This appeared to me to be an argument that self defense cannot exist if a gun is used.
Sent2: I am, however, suprised that gun rights advocates use this case to defend the right to own guns, because the case seems to imply the opposite, as stated by Tim.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: However, even though there were less deaths, there was a surge in gun crime, death and non-death related, after the ban on guns.
Sent2: If guns are banned, there will obviously be less guns in circulation.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Simply put, you should have to prove that the gun control you seek will do what you say it will do before burdening the Constitution with a load up of Liberal wishes and hopes!
Sent2: You say that gun control must not be effective because the study's conclusions about gun control were inconclusive.
[EX A]:
Not similar