Write a multi-choice question for the following article, with the given choices and answer: Article: Was Princess Diana murdered? The verdict is no. according to an inquiry held into the cause of her death over the last six months. The big question was whether the deaths of Diana and her boyfriend Dodi A1 Fayed in a deadly car crash in 1997 had been accidental, or whether there was some kind of conspiracy to have them killed. Dodi's father Mohamed A1 Fayed, owner of London's world-famous department store Harrods, has insisted for the last decade that the pair were murdered by spies of the British state who did not want them to marry. But _ The courtfound that Princess Diana and her boyfriend were not murdered but killed due to the "gross, carelessness" of her driver and the paparazzi . Her driver was drunk at the time of the crash and the paparazzi had been running after their car. So is this the end of the Diana story? British taxpayers may hope so. The inquiry has cost them about PS10m (140m RMB). "Thank God it's over", was the headline in The Guardian newspaper. UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown said it was time to "draw a line" under the death of the Princess. But Mohamed AI Fayed has refused to accept the judgment. He says the result will come as a "blow" to millions of his supporters around the world, and has not ruled out starting another investigation. Whatever happens, next, the special place Princess Diana has in the hearts of people around the world is not likely to be forgotten. Options: A what caused the deaths of Diana and her boyfriend B who were the paparazzi C how much British taxpayers paid for the case D whether the driver was drunk then . Answer: A what caused the deaths of Diana and her boyfriend Question:
Ans: According to the text, the inquiry focuses on _ .

Write a multi-choice question for the following article, with the given choices and answer: Article: You may have noticed that the world's population is not evenly distributed around our planet. There are some countries where people seem to be living nearly _ each other because conditions are overcrowded. Then there are others where it seems that hardly anybody lives. What influences this unequal distribution of people? There are specific advantages and disadvantages of *diving in a certain area. The two main factors that influence people's choice of location are climate and resources. Climate is the usual weather conditions in a region. Areas that have bad weather are generally less deal as places to live in. The north and south poles at the top and bottom of the world may be beautiful in their rugged, natural way, but the disadvantage of the bitterly cold and windy conditions usually keeps people away. When it comes to climate, warm conditions and a normal amount of rainfall are advantages that attract people. Natural resources are things that we get from nature that help us survive. Each region offers different resources, and therefore attracts different groups of people. People who enjoy the beach can make their living by catching and selling the ocean's many fish and other sea creatures. Those who prefer farming can take advantage of rich soil in valleys near rivers. Some people are willing to accept the disadvantages of the terrible conditions of deserts or mountains in order to take advantage of the resources like oil or woods. Options: A Resources and oceans. B Climate and rivers. C Climate and resources. D Warm conditions and rainfall. Answer: C Climate and resources. Question:
Ans: What are the main factors that influence the distribution of people?

Write a multi-choice question for the following article, with the given choices and answer: Article: British researchers have found that children's IQ predicts their probability of becoming vegetarians as young adults. Recent studies suggest that vegetarianism may be associated with lower cholesterol , reduced risk of overweight and heart disease. "We know from other studies that brighter children tend to behave in a healthier fashion as adults--they're less likely to smoke, less likely to be overweight,less likely to have high blood pressure and more likely to take exercise." lead author Catharine Gale said, "This study provides further evidence that people with a high IQ tend to have a healthier lifestyle." In the study, Gale's team collected data on nearly 8,200 men and women aged 30, whose IQ had been tested when they were 10 years of age. "Children who scored higher on IQ tests at age 10 were more likely than those who got lower scores to report that they were vegetarian at the age of 30."Gale said. The researchers found that 4.5 percent of participants were vegetarians. Of these, 2.5 percent were _ , and 33.6 percent said they were vegetarian but also ate fish or chicken. There was no difference in IQ score between strict vegetarians and those who said they were vegetarian but also ate fish or chicken,the researchers added. One expert said the findings weren't the whole answer,however. "We don't know the beliefs or attitudes of the parents of the children,nor do we know if there was a particular event that led these children to becoming vegetarian in their teens or adulthood." said Lona Sandon, and assistant professor at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas. Options: A the low IQ children will be unhealthier when they grow up B being vegetarians can reduce the risk of overweight and heart disease C IQ is important to vegetarians D high IQ children are more likely to become vegetarian when they grow up Answer: D high IQ children are more likely to become vegetarian when they grow up Question:
Ans: The main idea of the passage is that _ .

Write a multi-choice question for the following article, with the given choices and answer: Article: There's a dark little joke: Rip Van Winkle awakens in the 21st century after a hundred-year sleep. Men and women dash about, talking to small metal devices. Young people sit on sofas, moving miniature athletes around on electronic screens. Airports, hospitals, shopping malls-- every place Rip goes just puzzles him. But when he finally walks into a schoolroom, the old man knows exactly where he is. "This is a school," he declares. "We used to have these black in 1906. Only now the blackboards are green." American schools aren't exactly frozen in time, but considering the pace of change in other areas of life, our public schools tend to feel like throwbacks. Kids spend much of the day as their great-grandparents once did: sitting in rows, listening to teachers lecture, scribbling notes by hand, reading textbooks that are out of date. A yawning chasm separates the world inside the schoolhouse from the world outside. The national conversation on education has long focused on reading scores, math tests and closing the "achievement gap". This is not a story about that conversation. This is a story about the big public conversation the nation is not having about education, the one that will ultimately determine whether an entire generation of kids will fail to make the grade in the global economy because they can't think their way through abstract problems, work in teams or speak a language other than English. This week the conversation will burst onto the front page, when the NCSAW releases a blueprint for rethinking American education from pre-K to 12 and beyond to better prepare students _ in the global economy. While that report includes some debatable proposals, there is a remarkable agreement among educators and business and policy leaders on one key conclusion: we need to bring what we teach and how we teach into the 21st century. Today's economy demands not only a high-level competence in the traditional academic disciplines but also what might be called 21st-century skills. Options: A They look much like their great-grandparents. B They can do everything as they like. C They are well developed on all sides. D They are almost separated from the outside world. Answer: D They are almost separated from the outside world. Question:
Ans: What is the writer's general impression of American school children?