In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
Example: Comment: your posts shows you are stupid period
Example solution: Insult
Example explanation: This comment is insult because it is scornful and disrespectful.

Problem: Comment: I admit to being "simple". And your point is well taken. There are deacon-theologians out there with proper credentials that merit inclusion on the commission. And I do believe that actually living in the charism of the modern diakonia is indeed very relevant and even necessary before "adding" women to live it as well. The "historical" diaconate was not restored at the SVC.... the current diaconate was. In fact, many argue history does not support women in this role.... so looking at it from more than one theological lens is appropriate. One persons view of what is the proper credentials for commission membership is easily debated. Having no diaconal representation when plenty of qualified theologians are available is a mistake. Just ask the 45,000 deacons who are affected by it
Solution: Non-insult