Question:
Based on the premise "That was only after phone use became ubiquitous.", can we conclude that "It did not happen before phone use became ubiquitous."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Trent Lott must have been moved.

Sentence B: Trent Lott must have moved to a new area.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Dreams of it, sometimes, I does.
I do sometimes dream of it.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
The Administrator of the EPA has certified that the final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Here is a hypothesis:
The epa administrator says that the final rule will not significantly impact the economy.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: The interchange differs from the examples in the previous cases primarily in that (a) the payment is between two trust funds and (b) the payment may be made in either direction.

Sentence 2: The payment must be large, or it won't be considered.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"The rest of Pigalle plumbs the lower depths with a certain fascinating glee."
Hypothesis: Every portion of the depths remain unexplored and untouched.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no