Given a paragraph about movies, and a set of conversational question answers about the paragraph, answer a follow-up question from the paragraph. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: They didn't change the whole climax scene. In one version Rudra's father saying him that the girl he loved is actually his step sister, so he can not marry her. On the other hand, the scene is same but there is no dialogue as it is muted and audience needs to understand from their reaction and background score. This change was made because the film got poor audience response due to the dialogue delivery of the conversation. <sep> Q: What are the differences between two climax of Solo? A: In one version Rudra's father saying him that the girl he loved is actually his step sister, so he can not marry her <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What happens in the other version?
[EX A]: On the other hand, the scene is same but there is no dialogue as it is muted and audience needs to understand from their reaction and background score

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: You're kind of focusing on the wrong end of the sentiment. It's not so much that they did what Freddie wanted, it's that they never stood up to him or offered any critiques. What Freddie's trying to concede here is that he did his best work when Brian, Roger, and John were giving their input. The Munich guys were either unable or unwilling to stand up to Freddie's creativity, and so his work wasn't as good. In short, Freddie found out he is not the perfect musical force he believed he was before he went to Munich, he recognizes that he needs the rest of the band, and he's explaining why he was wrong in abandoning Queen. <sep> Q: Why is it a problem for Freddie if the guys from Munich did what he wanted? A: You're kind of focusing on the wrong end of the sentiment. It's not so much that they did what Freddie wanted Q: Why is their pushback that it was done? A: it's that they never stood up to him or offered any critiques Q: Why is that a problem if it got done? A: What Freddie's trying to concede here is that he did his best work when Brian, Roger, and John were giving their input Q: Then why didn't they give their input? A: The Munich guys were either unable or unwilling to stand up to Freddie's creativity, and so his work wasn't as good Q: How do they fix this? A: In short, Freddie found out he is not the perfect musical force he believed he was before he went to Munich <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How is Freddie able to get back to being a good musician?
[EX A]: he recognizes that he needs the rest of the band, and he's explaining why he was wrong in abandoning Queen

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: I am surprised no one has suggested a bullet proof vest as the explanation. The first shot, hitting Bond in the shoulder, is above the location of any kevlar plates. This shot leaves an entry wound and shrapnel. The second shot, that knocks Bond off the train, makes impact around his ribs on his right side. If Bond did have a bullet proof vest on, this area is likely to be covered. The impact from the bullet is transferred through the kevlar plate/s onto a larger area of Bonds body. Rather than penetrating his ribcage, and leaving an entry wound, the vest stops the bullet. Stopping the bullet before it enters his body imparts a lot more force onto Bond, which explains him being thrown off the train. It also explains the 4 broken ribs and minor organ damage. Bullet wounds are typically puncture wounds, deep and localised. Without a vest, Bond would have suffered much more serious organ damage as the bullet tears through him. Bullet proof vests typically leave blunt trauma injuries, affecting larger areas, and are not likely to leave scarring. One direct bullet wound is not likely to break 3 ribs, however the impact through a kevlar plate definitely is. <sep> Q: in Skyfall opening scene on train, does Bond fake getting shot? A: I am surprised no one has suggested a bullet proof vest as the explanation. The first shot, hitting Bond in the shoulder, is above the location of any kevlar plates Q: Where was he injured? A: The second shot, that knocks Bond off the train, makes impact around his ribs on his right side <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did he have internal injuries from the bullet?
[EX A]:
4 broken ribs and minor organ damage