In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: No, we don't have to "agree to disagree." It's just something trite people like to say. (Note you didn't even agree but went on arguing your opinion with, of all things, an appeal to your ignorance.)

As for the appeal to cite "any person nationally," you haven't even cited anyone so bugger off already. (Note, nor would it matter as it's all just silly opinion anyway.)

I repeat, shake things up a bit and hire Kaepernick as the quarterback.

Output: Non-identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: He's not from the inner city. He comes from an upper middle class family. Why would you mention inner city? Because he's black?

Output: Identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: When a HOMOSEXUAL that HAS SEX WITH DOGS WAS PRESIDENT LITTLE BLAK BARRY the MUSLUM DOG RAPING NIGER
he was DESTROYING the NATION
His ARMY of CANINE MEAT LOCKER MOUTH PROGRESSIVES will SOON be EXTINCT
ALONG WITH the NIGER RACE
GOD is CALLING the SCUM HOME
Output: Identity-attack