Given a paragraph, generate a claim that is supported by the given paragraph. 1) The claim must contain information from within the paragraph. 2) A sentence within the paragraph can be used as a claim. 3) The claim should not have contradictions within the paragraph. 4) The claim should be at most one sentence long.

Example Input: On December 18, 2018, a spate of posts and articles about fast food chain Popeye's new "emotional support chicken" appeared on social media:The move appeared to be a stunt that was either tasty or tasteless, depending on your perspective. Although several general news outlets posted about the Popeye's product, readers and social media users remained on high alert for leg pulls and marketing stunts based on the topics of the day in this case, the ongoing controversy around emotional support animal companions and air travel:Delta says it saw an 84 percent increase in reported incidents involving service and support animals in 2016 and 2017. According to the trade group Airlines for America, airlines in the US saw a 74 percent increase overall in emotional support animals from 2016 to 2017. This increase has caused other major airlines including American and United totighten their policies.Even if you haven't encountered a nonhuman passenger on your own flight, you've probably heard one of the viral stories about one, which seem to surface every few weeks. In January [2018], a woman was barred from bringing heremotional support peacockon a United flight, even when she offered to buy the bird its own seat.Likely owing in part to the evergreen popularity of the debate, Popeye's advertisement of a new purported product relating to emotional support animals proved popular on social media:Sorry, Fido. Popeyes #EmotionalSupportChicken doesn't bark on the plane. (Available in the Philadelphia airport on 12/18.) pic.twitter.com/vWyBWq4PTe Popeyes Chicken (@PopeyesChicken) December 18, 2018Popeye's issued a press release on December 18, 2018 about its purported new product:There is no doubt the holiday season is one of the busiest and most stressful travel times of the year. The airports are crowded, the delays are frustrating, and travelers are stressed about getting from point A to point B with gifts in hand. This year, POPEYES®️ is launching "Emotional Support Chicken" to provide a good-hearted laugh most need to get through stressful holiday air travel. Starting Tuesday, December 18 [2018], travelers passing through Philadelphia International Airport can purchase their fried chicken meal with an "Emotional Support Chicken" carrier at the Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen in Terminal C to bring with them on their flight.Emotional support animals provide comfort and companionship, especially during a highly stressful time like air travel. However, according to recent headlines, some travelers are pushing the envelope with the types of animals they try to bring on flights and classify as "emotional support animals," including the likes of peacocks, squirrels and tarantulas. Knowing this, Popeyes decided to launch its new "Emotional Support Chicken" to bring holiday travelers some humor to what is one of the most stressful places to be during the holidays the airport.As is often the case with headline-grabbing fast food news, Popeye's "Emotional Support Chicken" promotion was a bit overhyped for its real-world impact. The product was only available at one location (Philadelphia International Airport), and only while supplies lasted. Overall, the announcement largely served to get Popeye's a bunch of news mentions, with little substance behind the novelty item.
Example Output: "Popeye's Louisiana Kitchen is selling ""emotional support chicken"" for weary flight passengers."

Example Input: London's Metropolitan Police said the company had been charged with seven counts of supplying a medicinal product which was not of the nature or quality specified in the prescription. It was also accused of failing to take all reasonably practicable steps to ensure that patients were not infected by contaminants. The north London company said in a statement: "As founders of ITH we have every sympathy for all the families affected, regardless of the cause. However, we are disappointed by the decision to charge the company and will vigorously defend this case." The police investigation was launched in September 2014 following the death of a baby three months earlier at London's Guy's and St Thomas' hospital. The death of a second baby at the same hospital and a third at the Rosie Maternity Hospital in Cambridge, central England, in June 2014 were then also investigated. The inquiry followed an outbreak of a bacterial infection that affected some babies receiving Total Parental Nutrition (TPN), an intravenous feed. The seven babies involved in the investigation, including the three who died, had all received the feed. The investigation established that the cause of death of the first baby could be linked to TPN, although the deaths of the other two were not found to be linked. Five hospitals in total were involved in the investigation, the other three being Russells Hall Hospital in Dudley, Luton and Dunstable Hospital and Lister Hospital in Stevenage, all in central England. ITH Pharma, which was founded in 2008, said it had manufactured more than 1.4-million components of TPN since its launch and was the sole commercial supplier of reactive feeding solutions to the National Health Service. "This product has helped thousands of extremely vulnerable infants survive premature and complex births," it said. The case is due to start at Westminster Magistrates' Court in London on Dec. 17.
Example Output: UK police charge pharmaceutical company over hospital baby deaths.

Example Input: "There's plenty of fish in the waters of New Jersey, along with lots of other things: mercury, polychlorobiphenyls and dioxin, among them. And according to a former governor, there could be some danger in eating fish from Garden State waters. ""Many types of fish and shellfish from waters across the state are labeled unsafe to eat,"" Jim Florio wrote in a Dec. 14 guest column in The Star-Ledger about how new reductions in mercury pollution will protect New Jerseyans from contaminated seafood. It turns out Florio wasn't exactly telling a fish tale, PolitiFact New Jersey found. ""I think that's a fair and accurate statement actually,"" said Kerry Pflugh, manager of Constituent Services for the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. ""But that doesn't mean that everything we catch is unsafe to eat. Advisories are not based on water quality, it's based on what's in the fish itself. Fish advisories are set by tissue analysis, not water quality."" Jonathan Scott, communications director for Clean Water Action in Washington, DC said, ""We would agree with his assessment."" Florio could not be reached for comment. How are fish consumption advisories formulated? Fish collected from New Jersey waterways are sent to The Academy of Sciences of Drexel University in Philadelphia. Tissue samples are taken to test for contaminants mostly mercury, PCBs, DDT and other pesticides, said Richard Horwitz, senior biologist at the academy. A committee decides an acceptable risk for eating a particular fish based on potential health issues for people considered ""high risk"": children, pregnant women and women of child-bearing age, Horwitz said. They are advised to eat smaller portions of fish and less often. The 2010 Fish Consumption Advisories for all New Jersey waterways is available at the DEP's Office Of Science website. The 30-page document explains what parts of fish are safe to eat; proper preparation; consumption frequency; and more. ""Fish is a very healthy source of protein, vitamins and minerals,"" said Dr. Gary Buchanan, manager for the DEP's Office of Science. ""Just be careful about the fish you eat when catching them in local waters."" The state also considers federal recommendations made by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. ""The EPA provides guidance to assist states, Indian tribes and local governments in developing methods of monitoring, gathering and assessing information about their fish populations,"" EPA press officer John Martin said in an email. ""Since this information is only guidance, use by states is not mandatory. The States have primary responsibility for monitoring, assessing and making advisory decisions. Thus the basis for each State fish advisory varies."" While a variety of contaminants are found in fish, mercury is the most prevalent, experts told us. The mercury found in New Jersey waters comes from air pollution emitted from power plants, coal plants and incinerators from Pennsylvania and the Midwest, according to Buchanan, Horwitz and Scott. ""If those sources from out of state are reduced, that will help speed up the reduction of mercury in our waters and our fish and help allow additional fish consumption,"" Buchanan said. ""It is a nationwide problem. It's not just a New Jersey problem. Every state in the country has a fish advisory for some parameter and some species."" Even with the chemicals found in fish, New Jerseyans shouldn't fear eating fish caught from the state's waters, said Tom Fote, legislative chairman for the Jersey Coast Anglers Association in Toms River, as long as fish consumption guidelines are followed. ""Seafood coming out of New Jersey waters is no different than the seafood coming from out of any other state,"" Fote said. Ourruling Florio said in a recent opinion column in The Star-Ledger that most fish from New Jersey waterways ""is labeled unsafe to eat."" Experts told PolitiFact New Jersey that they agree with the former governor's assessment but also note that fish from New Jersey waters can be eaten safely by following consumption advisories. Also, fish bought in supermarkets or other stores in New Jersey are labeled, but recreationally caught fish are not. To comment on this story, go toNJ.com."
Example Output:
Many types of fish and shellfish from waters across the state are labeled unsafe to eat.