In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: if trump is the orange poodle does that mean obumma is a black monkey?
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: The democrats are not going to be happy until we are all un-armed and cowering helplessly face-down on the floor of a gay bar toilet.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Nice job BB!

Taking your analysis a little further, if enough Sanders supporters follow folks like the frequent poster here over the cliff, Sanders' "ideals" will be consigned to the ash-can of history. How can any sensible person believe that a Trump presidency would do anything other than place enormous power in a cabal of fascists?

I'm from the south, and I know a number of folks who have worked with Hillary, and she's held in the highest regard for her life's work. As another post pointed out, she's been the target of a relentless false narrative. Has she made mistakes? Of course. And some of them were big ones.

But she's been in the middle of the toughest decisions one can imagine and had to fight election campaigns with brutal adversaries. Sanders has never been tested by fire. And Trump is a maniacal clown, except as president of the most powerful country in the world, not so funny.

Let's hope smart folks who stood with Clinton in the primaries work hard for her election.
Example Output:
Non-identity-attack