In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: Participants raised questions about whether the SEC should reconsider the amount and targeting of its civil sanctions and more frequently use other types of remedies, such as criminal sanctions, to hold people accountable for wrongdoing. Choices: 1. Participants believe candles will be a great remedy for criminals. 2. Participants asked questions about different ways to hold criminals accountable for wrongdoing. 3. Participants asked many questions about the death penalty.

Output: 2

Input: Consider Input: Statement: There was usually only one research investigator, and the data consisted of descriptions, observations, impressions, unstructured interviews, and existing materials gathered at the site that were organized intuitively and informally. Choices: 1. The data collected by the research investigator proved very useful to his field. 2. There are plenty of research investigators that investigate data. 3. There is typically only a single research investigator.

Output: 3

Input: Consider Input: Statement: Scott Wheeler, president of the Eastern Bar Association of Los Angeles and an ally of the old program, said he mobilized his 200 members to staff the clinic after watching the ranks of unserved poor grow over the past year. Choices: 1. The Eastern Bar Association of Los Angeles has on president; Will Fonuit. 2. Wheeler's employment provided a long-term solution to poverty in his area. 3. Scott Wheeler mobilized a large group of people to help combat poverty.
Output: 3