Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

(CNN) -- Michelle Asci dreamed of capturing life through her camera lens. Asci had her sights set on being a photographer as she graduated with a bachelor of fine arts degree from Georgia State University in December.

But the 23-year-old is not working as a photographer. She's at a concession stand, selling popcorn or ushering people into their respective theaters before the midnight screening. Asci's been working part-time at the same Atlanta movie theater since 2005.

"It's going on to be eight years of this," she said. But working part-time at a movie theater was not what she saw herself doing with her degree, and she is not alone.

Last month's surprising drop in U.S. unemployment rates from 8.2% to 7.8% gave many hopes that the economy is improving, and the lower rates even beat the expectations of some economists. But a breakdown of the latest jobs report shows that more than half of the jobs added this month are part-time.

This leaves people like Asci wondering: Is the new American job part-time?

From law dreams to data-entry

Every day, Dolores Casillas holds her breath as she walks into the Chicago bank where she works part-time doing data entry. It's a temporary position, and she's heard her boss say time and time again that there might not be a job for her one of these days.

"There was someone at my job who was working for only three weeks, and she came in one day and didn't have a job. It's nerve-wracking," she said.

1. How old is Asci?
2. How long has she been working at the Atlanta movie theatre?
3. Does she work full time?
4. Does she have a degree?
5. Where did she get it?
6. What did she want to be?
7. What did the unemployment rate drop from?
8. to what?
9. What did people hope that meant?
10. How many jobs added were part time?
11. where does Casillas work?
12. Where?
13. full time?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. 23
2. eight years
3. no
4. yes
5. Georgia State University
6. a photographer
7. 8.2%
8. 7.8%
9. economy is improving
10. more than half
11. a bank
12. Chicago
13. no

Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

CHAPTER XXI

OFF FOR THE MINING DISTRICT

While Jack Wumble was off attending to his private business the three Rover boys took a stroll through Denver.

The city was different from any they had visited, and their walk was full of interest.

Coming to a store in the window of which were exhibited a number of Indian curiosities, the boys halted to examine the objects, when Tom uttered a sudden cry.

"Look, Dick! There is Bradner inside!"

"Yes, and Dan Baxter is with him!" returned the elder brother quickly. "Here's luck, surely!"

"Will you have them locked up?" asked Sam.

"To be sure--if we can."

The boys looked around for a policeman, but none happened to be in sight.

"Run and see if you can find one," said Dick to Sam. "Tom and I can watch the pair."

At once Sam made off. But policemen were not numerous, and it took quite some time to locate one and explain what was wanted.

In the meantime Dan Baxter had caught sight of Tom and told Bradner of his discovery.

Boy and man came out of the store in a great hurry. They were about to run off when Dick caught Bradner by the arm, while his brother halted the former bully of Putnam Hall.

"Let go of me!" hissed Bradner, and as Dick paid no attention he aimed a blow for the youth's head. But Dick "had been there before," and dodged, and the force of his effort nearly took the rascal off his feet. Before he could recover Dick had him down on his back and was sitting on his chest.

1. What was Wumble off doing?
2. What were the Rover boys doing?
3. Where they bored with their walk?
4. What was in the shop window?
5. What did Tom see inside?
6. Who was Bradner with?
7. Did they want them in jail?
8. Who did they need to do that?
9. Did they find one quickly?
10. Were there a lot of cops around?
11. Who did Baxter see?
12. Who grabbed Bradner?
13. Who was sitting on his chest?
14. How many Rover boys were there?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. attending to business
2. taking a stroll
3. no
4. Indian curiosities
5. Bradner
6. Dan Baxter
7. yes
8. a policeman
9. no
10. no
11. Tom
12. Dick
13. Dick
14. three

Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

CHAPTER VII

I experienced a great surprise a few mornings afterwards. I had risen quite early, and found the Celebrity's man superintending the hoisting of luggage on top of a van.

"Is your master leaving?" I asked.

"He's off to Mohair now, sir," said the valet, with a salute.

At that instant the Celebrity himself appeared.

"Yes, old chap, I'm off to Mohair," he explained. "There's more sport in a day up there than you get here in a season. Beastly slow place, this, unless one is a deacon or a doctor of divinity. Why don't you come up, Crocker? Cooke would like nothing better; he has told me so a dozen times."

"He is very good," I replied. I could not resist the temptation to add, "I had an idea Asquith rather suited your purposes just now."

"I don't quite understand," he said, jumping at the other half of my meaning.

"Oh, nothing. But you told me when you came here, if I am not mistaken, that you chose Asquith because of those very qualities for which you now condemn it."

"Magna est vis consuetudinis," he laughed; "I thought I could stand the life, but I can't. I am tired of their sects and synods and sermons. By the way," said he pulling at my sleeve, "what a deuced pretty girl that Miss Thorn is! Isn't she? Rollins, where's the cart? Well, good-bye, Crocker; see you soon."

He drove rapidly off as the clock struck six, and an uneasy glance he gave the upper windows did not escape me. When Farrar appeared, I told him what had happened.

1. who asks about the celebrity?
2. where was the man putting the baggage?
3. where is the celeb going to?
4. Is he happy at Asquith?
5. who does he say would like it?
6. what did he say about Asquith?
7. why not?
8. does he think it is fast paced?
9. did he like Asquith in the past?

Numbered answers:

A:
1. Crocker
2. on top of a van
3. Mohair
4. no
5. Cooke
6. That he cant stand the life there
7. because of their sects and synods and sermons
8. unknown
9. Yes he did