Question:
In spite of himself he believed in the omniscience of the enemy.

Does it follow that "He believed that the enemy didn't know anything."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If yeah well no wonder they're out of it, can we say that "No wonder they are out of it because of their choices."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"They treat games of chance as exactly that--games."
Hypothesis: They treat tick tack toe as a dance.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: British playwright David Hare, criticized in the past for his preachy politics, is said to have finally found his way beyond polemic (John Lahr, The New Yorker ). Hare's new play about a self-centered film critic, his wife, and his mother-in-law is hailed as a coup de theatre (Matt Wolf, Variety ), both for its social critique (of the amorality of the news media) and for its sensitivity about such personal matters as loss, grief and stoical survival (Benedict Nightingale, the London Times ). Hare's enthusiasts declare it time for canonization. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The playwright used to be critiqued for political content has created a play that appeals to non-political fans. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "You see, I've figured it out that those things of Tuppence's are a plant too, and she's no more drowned than I am.", can we conclude that "Tuppence didn't drown because he is being hidden in a sack under the rug."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

input question: I wouldn't mind going to him and telling him everything." 88 Somewhat to her surprise, Julius negatived the idea sharply. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Julius was going to negatively speak about cameras. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer:
no