Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

Ex Input:
Context: Within Australian hospitals, cardiac and respiratory arrests result in a resuscitation attempt unless the patient is documented as not for resuscitation.', 'To examine the consistency of policies and documentation for withholding in-hospital resuscitation across health services.', 'An observational, qualitative review of hospital policy and documentation was conducted in June 2013 in three public and two private sector hospitals in metropolitan Melbourne. Not for resuscitation (NFR) forms were evaluated for physical characteristics, content, authorisation and decision-making. Hospital policies were coded for alerts, definition of futility and burden of treatment and management of discussions and dissent.', 'There was a lack of standardisation, with each site using its own unique NFR form and accompanying site-specific policies. Differences were found in who could authorise the decision, what was included on the form, the role of patients and families, and how discussions were managed and dissent resolved. Futility and burden of treatment were not defined independently. These inconsistencies across sites contribute to a lack of clarity regarding the decision to withhold resuscitation, and have implications for staff employed across multiple hospitals.
Answer: NFR forms should be reviewed and standardised so as to be clear, uniform and consistent with the legislative framework. We propose a two-stage process of documentation. Stage 1 facilitates discussion of patient-specific goals of care and consideration of limitations of treatment. Stage 2 serves to communicate a NFR order. Decisions to withhold resuscitation are inherently complex but could be aided by separating the decision-making process from the communication of the decision, resulting in improved end-of-life care.

Ex Output:
Does comparison of not for resuscitation ( NFR ) form across five Victorian health services?

Ex Input:
Context: A functional vacuolar adenosine triphosphatase (v-ATPase) complex regulates canonical Wnt/-catenin signaling. The goal of this study was to identify the distribution of the v-ATPase in human and murine models of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasms (PanINs) and assess its role in Wnt/-catenin signaling.', 'We evaluated the immunolabeling pattern of the v-ATPase in human PanIN specimens and murine PanIN-1 and PanIN-2 lesions obtained from Ptf1a(Cre/+); LSL-Kras(G12D) mice. Wnt/-catenin signaling was interrogated in primary PanIN cells by examining the phosphorylated levels of its surface coreceptor, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-6 (LRP6), and its intracellular effector, nonphosphorylated -catenin. The response of primary PanIN cells to epidermal growth factor (EGF) was assessed in the absence and presence of the v-ATPase inhibitor, concanamycin.', 'In advanced (PanIN-2), but not early (PanIN-1), lesions, the v-ATPase assumed a polarized phenotype. Blocking the v-ATPase disrupted Wnt/-catenin signaling in primary PanIN cells despite significantly higher levels of the total and activated Wnt cell surface coreceptor, LRP6. Vacuolar adenosine triphosphatase blockade significantly decreased the total and activated levels of EGF receptor, a determinant of PanIN progression. The activation of EGF receptor and its intracellular mediator, p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase, was also reduced by v-ATPase blockade. This led to diminished proliferation in response to EGF ligand.
Answer: The v-ATPase regulates Wnt/-catenin and EGF receptor signaling in PanINs.

Ex Output:
Does polarization of the vacuolar adenosine triphosphatase delineate a transition to high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasm lesions?

Ex Input:
Context: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are recommended for treating chemotherapy-induced anemia in breast cancer patients. Reduced survival rates in ESAs-treated patients have been reported, possibly due to thromboembolic complications, however the exact mechanism remains obscure. The principal activator of blood coagulation in cancer is tissue factor (TF). There are data that erythropoietin receptor (EPO-R) is expressed in tumor cells. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the expression of EPO-R and TF in loco in breast cancer.', 'The expression of EPO-R and TF was investigated in 24 invasive breast carcinoma specimens. Immunohistochemical (IHC) methodologies according to ABC technique and double-staining IHC procedure were employed utilizing antibodies against EPO-R and TF.', 'Expression of EPO-R and TF was demonstrated in the tumor cells in all breast cancer specimens. No staining for EPO-R and TF was visualized in normal breast tissue. Double staining studies revealed co-expression of both EPO-R and TF in breast cancer cells and endothelial cells.
Answer: EPO-R and TF expression and their coexpression in breast cancer cells suggest a possibility that EPO-R might be responsible for some adverse effects and reduced survival observed in ESAs-treated breast cancer patients with anemia, possibly due to the interaction with TF. Further experimental studies are warranted to determine the role of both EPO-R and TF in the treatment with ESAs of breast cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia.

Ex Output:
Are erythropoietin receptor and tissue factor coexpressed in human breast cancer cells?