Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Boozer: I'm guessing the Courts will eventually decide if this ban is a "traffic safety matter" or a blatant attempt to circumvent the Constitutional Protections provided by the First Amendment.

I've yet to read of a single incident of a traffic accident being caused by someone passing spare change to a panhandler. I've yet to read of a single incident of a panhandler being struck by a vehicle.

If you follow the "traffic safety" logic, Springfield should make it completely illegal for pedestrians to cross main street. Why don't you tally the number killed crossing that street and compare it to the number of panhandlers struck by vehicles.

The proposed ban is, indeed, that "end run" I suggest. I don't expect the City or any supporters of the ban to acknowledge this (although a few posters on this site have done so). I don't expect the Police Chief to acknowledge it. I don't expect the City Council to acknowledge it. I don't expect Springfield's attorneys to acknowledge it

Output: No

Input: Consider Input: The republican party now realizes their party is a joke and Trump has become the punch line.

Output: Yes

Input: Consider Input: Beyond BS, be it SB 21 or ACES, no tax credit law for Alaska's oil should be structured to result in NO royalty revenue. Both SB21 and ACES were pushed by the cabal of Republican legislators to create an unbalanced contract. Simply, Alaska's royalty should be no less than the profit gained by the oil producer. Anything less is a give-away. Now it is not only a give-away, but an insane result of paying the oil companies to "take without compensation" oil and gas that is first owned by Alaska. As it stands, it is a criminal theft of Alaska's resource property. The Alaska legislature must set right the situation (an undesirable situation): otherwise, "by the time a problem becomes patently obvious, it may be almost too late to remedy it." If not remedied in this session then the immediate solution is to REMEMBER THIS IN NOVEMBER.
Output: Yes