Teacher: In this task, you're given a review from Amazon and rating for the product on a scale of 1-5 based on the review. The rating means 1: extremely poor, 2: poor, 3: neutral, 4: good, 5: extremely good. Your task is to generate whether the rating matches the review or not. Answer with "True" if the sentence belongs to that section, otherwise answer with "False"
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
Review: These are junk! Both bulbs have burned out within a two month period!! I cannot believe that this company can be in business with such poor quality. I have used infrared lights for my ball python for many years now and I get a varied range of months from a bulb, but I have never gone through two bulbs in a matter of two months! I am very disappointed.
Rating: 1
Solution: True
Reason: The user seems very disappointed in the product because the bulb they ordered has been burned out earlier than usual. So, he gave 1 star to the review considering it extremely poor. So, true is the correct answer.

Now, solve this instance: Review: Loved this little machine. It replaced a Keurig - I hated the taste of the pod coffee. I love using freshly ground beans in the Ninja. The controls are simple and clearly labeled and the machine is easy to operate. The milk frother is easy to operate and clean. The large travel mug is useful for brewing two cups of coffee. The 4 oz setting with frothed milk is almost a real latte! The machine does not use a lot of counter space. And the price is very reasonable. However!!!! After less than 12 months of use, the water container cracked, the drip stop leaks, the clean light turns on weekly, and a significant amount of liquid remains in the filter after the machine beeps.
Rating: 1
Student:
True