Question:
Based on the premise "The Fuji case dealt with the tightly interlocked relationship between Fuji and Japan's four largest distributors of photographic film and paper, all of whom sold Fuji exclusively.", can we conclude that "The Fuji case dealt with the tightly interlocked relationship between Fuji and Japan's four largest distributors"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: This attribution may be less endorsed with medical conditions such as liver disease or pancreatitis.

Sentence B: Liver disease and pancreatitis are medical conditions that require little treatment.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Founded by French architect Auguste Mariette in an attempt to stop the flow of artifacts to museums around the world, it has grown into one of the major collections in the world, housing some of the finest treasures of the ancient Egyptian civilization.
Mariette collected twenty mummies.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
The preambles to both the proposed and final rules reflect HUD's finding that the rule will not have a significant impact on the environment.

Here is a hypothesis:
HUD's findings suggest that the rules will have a significant impact on the environment.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Although many of the sanctions have been lifted, inflation remains sky high.

Sentence 2: Inflation is still very high despite a number of the sanctions being lifted.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"Abracadabra, he cried."
Hypothesis: He cried out because he knew that he had lost the game.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell