Problem: BODY: I thought it might behoove you guys to know about this, even though I am unclear as to its meaning myself. Basically, Cara made a change in scheduling that she did not change in Enpower, and it has to do with an ongoing deal being managed by the short and long term northwest desks. In addition, Carla and I zeroed out a deal for Diana Scholtes in scheduling - 473338 - selling to Modesto at NP-15 for BOM on peak. For some reason, she just needed it zeroed out for tomorrow, so we did not change the deal in deal entry. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks,
======
A: SUBJECT: Explained variance for 12/13

Problem: BODY: market_relations@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: Dear Market Participants: On the November 1999 & December 1999 Transmission Customer Monthly Statements many customers have noted under the "Energy Settlement" section for "Forward Energy" a change in MW-Hrs with no associated change in dollar amounts. This is because of a correction in the sign convention for the MW-Hrs related to external generation transactions (transactions from a proxy bus to the NYISO reference bus). For all other types of transactions the NYISO charges customers the appropriate TUC or LBMP based on the MWs that flowed, but for external generation transactions, customers receive payments from the NYISO, and therefore these types of transactions have an opposite sign convention. The dollars associated with the external generation transactions have always had the proper sign convention, but the MW-Hrs have not. On 01/17/2000 this sign convention was corrected for all billing months going forward resulting in the correct MW-Hr values being reported from February 2000 to date. However, November 1999 - January 2000 did not have the proper MW-Hrs reported on the Transmission Customer Monthly Statements. With the latest settlement adjustments posted the MW-Hrs are being corrected with the proper sign convention. Transmission Customers will see similar changes in their forward energy MW-Hrs for January 2000's settlement adjustment.
======
A: SUBJECT: November & December 1999 Settlement Adjustments

Problem: BODY: Frontera is not scheduled to run tomorrow. However all units should be available, but offline with the following exception: He 10 - some gas line work is being done and Frontera can only run in a 1/1 config, meaninig a max of 220. The steamer, #3 and CT #1 will be the only units available. For this hour. Late word: If Ercot doesnt OOM us, the entire plant will be unavailable and offline for he 1, as well. In this scenario, only hour ending 1 and 10 would be affected. Any questions? JMF
======
A:
SUBJECT: Frontera Availability for tomorrow