Dear Stacey, The R21, R22 curves for 2/5 have been copied over. However, there is no 2/6 curves for Estate, so those are not copied. The 2/6 Alberta Post IDs were calculated using Non-Exact curves. Will the Estate Alberta curves be marked in the future? Thanks, Norman.
Answer: Canadian Curves.
Here is an email: A quote from Pennsylvania Ave.: "This is pretty serious!" This was just received from the DOE and pertains particularly to DOE and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) facilities: "DOE/NNSA is at SECON 3 with additional measures designed to detect and deter vehicular-borne explosives. Effective immediately, and until further notice, all DOE/NNSA activities shall add measures to their current heightened state of readiness designed to deter terrorist attacks by visibly increased perimeter security and security checks. Change in routines, including institution of random measures, shall also be implemented." Thank you,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: NERC security update from DOE
Q: Steve, This email is to notify Columbia Gas Transmission of Enron North America's intention to exercise our right of first refusal for the subject contract. By this notification, Enron does not agree to continue the agreement beyond the current expiration date or match the highest value bid in any subsequent auction. If you have any questions concerning this notification, please feel free to call me at (713) 853 - 7276. Thanks for your help,
Propose a subject line
A: FTS Agreement 67207
IN: Please ammend our WIC contract number 41066 to have the term match up to the MDQ. Currently the MDQ goes to 0 after November 30,2009 but the term continues with a 0 MDQ through November 30, 2013. We would like to match up the term with the MDQ so that the term expires on Nomber 30,2009. Your earliest attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated. Thanks,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Enron North America WIC contract number 41066 ammendment
IN: This is an email
Jack: Enclosed is a new draft of the Schedules marked against the previous draft. I believe that this draft responds to most of the issues raised in your e-mails. Just a few additional thoughts: 1. Since we will be redoing all of the existing confirms to refer to this Master, I did not change the language that states that conflicts between the Confirms and the Agreement are resolved in favor of the Confirm. I think that the language as written works. 2. On the setoff language, when we are the Non-Defaulting Party, we can only pull in other agreements between our affiliates and inland so I don't see how this language would impact any agreements between ENA and guaranty Bank unless Inland is the Non-Defaulting party. 3. With respect to Disruption Fallbacks, our view is that if the Confirm specifies a Fallback reference Price that after Postponement, you would use that price if available. I think that the language works as drafted. 4. On cash collateral, the Qualified institution concept only applies when the non-posting party is a Defaulting party or has a Credit rating below the threshold. Otherwise the non-posting party can hold the collateral and do whatever it wants to with it. Your are correct that in practice this cash gets commingled with corporate funds and swept into the party's bank account but there is no requirement taht it work that way. We look forward to having a call with your group next week. Please e-mail me with some days and times so that I can alert our people. thanks.

What is the subject?

OUT: New Draft
Andrea, Is it possible to get a list of first year analysts who graduated in December to interview for my group? I don't know how the process works, but I would like to hire a candidate just out of college if possible. Thanks for your help. DG 3-9573
Answer:
First Year