QUESTION: Given the sentence "There is a man in a red helmet climbing a mountain near a big body of water." can we conclude that "The man is a rockclimber."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A man with a helmet does not have to be a rockclimber.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Three women and a man around a table as if having a meeting." is it true that "Some people around a table."?
Women and a man are people. One can infer this correctly.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A group of spectators enjoying an event."
Hypothesis: "Spectators enjoy the event."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: If there is more than one spectator then there is a group of spectators.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A large group of people traveling down a countryside road in the back of a small pickup truck while one person is walking along side the truck." is it true that "The small truck is driving slow so the walker can keep up."?

Let's solve it slowly: One person is walking along side the truck so the truck must be driving slow so the walker can keep up.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man stands inside a bus stop."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man is inside the bus stop waiting for a bus." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The man might be an employee instead of waiting for a bus.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A monk in a red shawl looks at the camera."
Hypothesis: "A monk looking at the camera."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A:
The monk looks at the camera is carrying out the action of looking regardless of what he is wearing.
The answer is yes.