In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Shouldn't complainant have been charged with sexually assaulting Sameer Kara? I mean he was passed out the whole time; she was on top of him trying to wake him up, she was fondling him as she was having intercourse with one cop and oral sex with the other. Kara was passed out drunk and could have gone to jail. Career and marriage probably ruined, and complainant gets away scott free? What is going on in the media? What is with this media sanctioned bullshit? Where are real journalists? (robyn doolitlle pfft.)
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: This firm is a train wreck, selling very very expensive funds that have not done very well.

And everyone leaving?? Obviously there is a lot of 'screwing the client' going on.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Yes and those people are dumb.... for the far right it is a major case of cognitive dissonance. They are deeply trenched in on their beliefs and when anything is said to challenge that, their brains suffer from cognitive dissonance and they do not hear a word anyone says......unless of course someone pipes back up, "Trump is great". etc.....then the flood gates of their feeble minds re-awake.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit