In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: RadirD, Kim Jung Un and the DPRK regime threaten us all the time. Why would Trump or any other rational person use that as a line in the sand? It took them a few hours after his asinine statement to threaten us yet again. Foolish.

The only person who yells out "I'm going to punch you in the face!" is a coward who doesn't actually want a fistfight (like Kim Jong Un). A serious person would just slam you in the kisser without warning.

Don't get me wrong, the DPRK is a growing and serious threat and there may not be a way out of a conflict at this point. They have been seriously mishandled and underestimated by every president (both GOP and Dems) since the Korean war.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: Hilarious. Or would be if it wasn't so scary. Right up there with Pope Gregory's women are good for ----ing and motherhood.

Answer: Sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: I was told that a bunch of dicks surf out there and are territorial. They tell you to leave and not come back.

Answer:
Sexual-explicit