Question: Sentence A: Pesticide concentrations should not exceed USEPA's National Ambient Water Quality chronic criteria values where available.

Sentence B: There are no controls on pesticide concentrations.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: uh as long as i can remember
I don't recall it prior to yesterday.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
but uh i still think there's plenty of good football players around that just were not able to get on the NFL because the NFL's teams were just full

Here is a hypothesis:
The NFL teams consisted only of competent players.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: A literary critic's biography of the 18 th -century satirical English painter wins praise for bringing [her] subject and his milieu alive (Bruce Cook, the Washington Post Book World ). The critics accept Uglow's revisionist claim that Hogarth's famous moralizing was accompanied by a prurient fixation on sex.

Sentence 2: Critics reluctantly accept Uglow's revisionist claim.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
you know get a big crown done you know things like that but

Does it follow that "He got a big crown done."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "That John Cavendish still loved his wife, I was convinced. ", can we conclude that "I did not think that John Cavendish loved his wife."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no