Premise:
"The Congress has given GAO broad statutory rights of access to a wide range of federal agency documents."
Hypothesis: Congress did not give GAO access to any federal agency documents
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: Well, we wouldn't mind hearing her back history, said Tuppence guardedly. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Tuppence wanted to hear her story."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "While consumer activists pump for another technological fix--smart air bags that can adjust their behavior to the stature of front-seat passengers--more and more of us (perhaps influenced in part by mandatory seat-belt laws in 49 states) are squandering those 2.97 precious seconds and buckling up.", can we conclude that "We want improved air bag technology because seat belts are a nuisance."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: The National Association for Public Interest Law leads the country in organizing, training and supporting public service-minded law students and in creating summer and postgraduate public interest jobs that bring equal justice to millions of low-income persons and families.

Sentence B: The National Association for Public Interest Law does not have any offers to help law students.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: You can also order a CD.
You cannot order a CD.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
exactly next big issue up yeah yeah because i think uh young and old alike uh would would more or less agree on this issue

Here is a hypothesis:
People of all ages likely agree on this issue.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes