Problem: Here is a premise:
Jon saw the exact moment, the moment when Adrin's sword and dagger and body moved in response to Jon's attacks before Jon had yet thrown them.

Here is a hypothesis:
Jon stabbed Adrin in the chest and watched him die.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: I never used him again.

Sentence 2: I use him regularly.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Though Seti commissioned the temple between 1291 and 1279 b.c. , the colonnaded courtyards and ramps on its facade were added by his son Ramses II who usurped his father, trying every way possible to excise his name from the temple walls.

Does it follow that "Ramses II did not excise his father's name. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If weapon systems over the next 5 years requires an approach that keeps cost, schedule, and performance risks to a minimum., can we say that "Schedule, cost and performance risks are important factors to consider in the approach taken to weapons systems in the next half-decade."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"In fact, the protests did not occur."
Hypothesis: It it possible the protests did not occur.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: He had a video camera attached to the ceiling, which recorded every move.

Sentence 2: The video camera was put in place to catch thieves.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell