[QUESTION] Premise: "Baseball players with one tagging the other out."
Hypothesis: "Two baseball teams are playing for the championship title."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Baseball players can play without the championship title being at stake.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "People eating at a long table full of food and drink." can we conclude that "Thanksgiving dinner was a big event at my grandmother's house."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Their are many reasons people would eat at a table full of food and drink not only for thanksgiving and there is no mention of the location being a grandmother's house.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A man is launching a spear with an atyl-atyl."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man threw it hard." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: The man could have threw the spear soft and not hard.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man is tending to a little baby that is trying to stand up."
Hypothesis: "A man is tending to his own baby as it tries to stand."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The man tending the little baby does not imply it is his own baby.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A guy with a red shirt walking."
Hypothesis: "A guy is wearing a pink shirt."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: If a guy is in a red shirt he is not in a pink shirt.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Machinists at work with heavy machinery." can we conclude that "Machinists are playing the piano."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Machinists at work with heavy machinery cannot be the ones playing the piano.
The answer is no.