TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: This article is somewhere between deceptive and fraudulent.
1)The first step in suing the state or any other entity is the FILING of the COMPLAINT and SERVING the defendant the COMPLAINT. The state says they have not been served the complaint. Therefore at this time no complaint has been filed.
The truth is, at best, is that the plaintiff is PREPARING to sue the state and I hardly find this to be any way news worthy! Seriously WTF?

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Yeah, I'e been living with this issue for most of my life. I'm happy to keep it alive.

There's no question that men who make sexual overtures from a position of power commit an abuse of power. And yes, it's exactly these blurry lines that become problematic.

When I was quite young (I may even have been a minor) I had a boss who got sexual with me when we were alone in a room. I rebuffed him, and he was a gentleman about it. I was really annoyed, but I continued to work at that job for a while. Was it an abuse of power? Yes. Was it a crime? Actually, legally it may have been. But I don't think of it as a crime. Women used to experience this kind of stuff all the time. I'd like to think the culture has changed a bit since then.

Unfortunately, as you may remember, I have also been a rape victim. So I give women who claim they've been raped the benefit of the doubt. But...at times, it's not the truth.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: "we have to quit making the mistakes in funding whacko projects like we've been doing"

That's just it, they aren't going to cut any boondoggles, or the LIO, or the $300 a day(getting a raise in May) per diem, or the free vacations, the office supply slush fund, or the tax credits.

Micchiche actually suggested increasing the budget for their subsidized cafeteria.

They will only cut things that hurt Alaskans, because they want us to feel the pain so we give them our money.

Once they take our money, they will still spend it on whatever they damn well please. Count on it.

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit