We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: The crime comes from using the gun (or any other weapon) to violate the rights of others.
Sent2: I see you always use gun crime rates as an argument, are you totally uninterested in other types of violent crimes, what happens when all guns are banned and we only have knife crimes?

Ex Output:
Not similar

Ex Input:
Sent1: I think law abiding citizens should be allowed to carry conceled weapons.
Sent2: Wow I think we must just be confused by the fact you openly abuse those who support guns in the hands of law abiding citizens.

Ex Output:
Not similar

Ex Input:
Sent1: You still have to prove that gun control equals crime control and your admission that it does not is proof that it is about control and dependency on government to protect you when they have no obligation to do so.
Sent2: If you want any protection for your rights, you have to be able to present an argument outlining how they are being violated.

Ex Output:
Not similar