You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
--------
Question: ['Hey there neighbor', 'Thoughts on how we want to split the Balkans?', 'Hello there yourself', "what are your thoughts? I haven't spoken to anyone else yet so. I am open to ideas before that. We would most certainly need to deal with Russia sooner rather than later", "Agreed -- I'd rather deal with Russia from the get go as well. Have you heard anything from Italy tho? I'm kind of worried of committing north if they're an unknown quantity"]

Answer: All I have heard from Italy thus far is they don't want to fight so... hopefully that is the case

Question: ["Good morning, France.

I wanted to reach out to you to see where your mind is at initially. I also wanted to let you know up front that, unless something changes, I will be moving to Ruhr. I'm not worrying about Belgium at this point, but I do want to ensure that I have Holland locked down. Most importantly, this isn't intended as hostility towards you.

With that out of the way, what's going on so far? Have you heard from Italy, England, or Russia? What are you hoping for early?", "Checking back in with one more question: would you prefer to plan a stand-off in Burgundy? I'm not excited about it, but I'm open to it.", "Hi Germany!

Bounce in Burgundy sounds good. But your move to Ruh... idk, not really liking that. Holland is guaranteed to you winter 1901 no matter if you have Ruh or not. The main reason you would move it there in 1901 would be to take Belgium, and then move in on me. It feels pretty anti-france. Hopefully we can work something out, and maybe even arrange an alliance against England? About that, have you heard anything from them? I havn't.

Looking forwards to a good game! -France", "Yes, England reached out to me, and asked if I was interested in an alliance of the three of us. I told him I wasn't, as that rarely ends well for Germany. I told him I was definitely interested in allying with one of you, but not both.

I'm not a big fan of a bounce in Burgundy. It's kind of a fear maneuver that puts both of us behind overall. It's nice on your end, since it functions as your defense and frees up Marsailles.

Speaking of Marsailles - nothing from Italy? I haven't heard from him yet.", 'What would the rest of S01 look like with the Burgundy bounce?']

Answer: So... what are you going to do about ruhr? The rest of S01 really depends on where we want this to go. Do you want a full on alliance against england or just an agreement of DMZs and who gets what territories.

Question: ['Hey Germany, would you like to work together?', 'Yes I'd like to work together. Can you let me know what your regional alliances are besides me?', 'Currently, France and I are keeping the channel clear and, for 1901 only, we aren't building fleets in Brest or Liverpool.

I've asked Russia not to go north and am trying to convince Italy to not hit France.

My preference is to work with you over France long-term because you can build armies while I build fleets, ensuring neither of us can effectively stab the other', 'To work with you, I'd ask that you don't build F Kie in 1901 and that you let me have Belgium at some point before 1904', 'I'm good with that plan. Similarly I'd rather ally with you over France but will be needing to discuss nonaggression for the moment with France.']

Answer:
I can hold off on building fleets initially.