The history of Latin canon law can be divided into four periods: the jus antiquum, the jus novum, the jus novissimum and the Code of Canon Law. In relation to the Code, history can be divided into the jus vetus (all law before the Code) and the jus novum (the law of the Code, or jus codicis).
If it is possible to answer this question, answer it for me (else, reply "unanswerable"): What did jus vetus follow?
Ah, so.. unanswerable

In the first post war years Tito was widely considered a communist leader very loyal to Moscow, indeed, he was often viewed as second only to Stalin in the Eastern Bloc. In fact, Stalin and Tito had an uneasy alliance from the start, with Stalin considering Tito too independent.
If it is possible to answer this question, answer it for me (else, reply "unanswerable"): Who was Tito considered second to in the Eastern bloc?
Ah, so.. Stalin

The Scottish philosopher David Hume (17111776) responded to Berkeley's criticisms of Locke, as well as other differences between early modern philosophers, and moved empiricism to a new level of skepticism. Hume argued in keeping with the empiricist view that all knowledge derives from sense experience, but he accepted that this has implications not normally acceptable to philosophers. He wrote for example, "Locke divides all arguments into demonstrative and probable. On this view, we must say that it is only probable that all men must die or that the sun will rise to-morrow, because neither of these can be demonstrated. But to conform our language more to common use, we ought to divide arguments into demonstrations, proofs, and probabilitiesby 'proofs' meaning arguments from experience that leave no room for doubt or opposition." And,
If it is possible to answer this question, answer it for me (else, reply "unanswerable"): What was Locke's nationality?
Ah, so..
unanswerable