Problem: Here is a premise:
Neurological disorders Learning disabilities Retarded development Cerebral palsy

Here is a hypothesis:
Both learning disabilities and retarded development result in lingering difficulties with formal education.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Because CCLS is not part of the class Congress sought to benefit in enacting the LSCA, we must conclude that Congress did not intend to imply a private cause of action by CCLS to challenge the LSC's exercise of its statutory and regulatory duties.

Sentence 2: Congress probably did not intend this benefit to apply to private actions.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
huh well that's uh that's quite a savings having that talent

Does it follow that "I don't see any benefit with that talent really."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If yeah i uh i i lived in a part of Houston that was uh unpleasant i lived south down in uh the Montrose area, can we say that "I have never been to Houston."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"absolutely yeah i agree"
Hypothesis: I don't think so, I disagree.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: And now you are going to die to defend them.

Sentence 2: There is no way that you will win if you defend him.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell