Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example is below.
Q: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
A: Yes
Rationale: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: I understand where you are coming from. I assume with my hypothetical question that you would not recommend recusing Carlson if your client was charged with a felony assault on a gay man. Reasonable minds might disagree with your position. But if your test is as you say: whether the judge gets reversed a lot on denying suppression motions or for other errors and more than his peers, then I expect you would not be trying many cases in Carlson's court since his record for reversals was far more than any other judge during his tenure trying criminal and domestic cases. But since such refusals are so opaque as you suggested how would anyone know your reasons? You may have the last word. I have concluded.
A:
No