Question:
Based on the premise "Also, special tax credits and deductions are aimed at spurring private R&D.", can we conclude that "There are special tax credits and deductions trying to improve the growth of private R&D."?
****
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "The corporation changed the name of the product to Dr Perenni's Le Pudd Skin Care, and made an even bigger killing on it, especially in the US, where puddles are a thing of the past, because of very effective drainage systeMs. And Doctor Edward Perennial? For about four and a half months he was more famous that his famous brother, but now was back up a shit creek without a paddle, pushed there by Olek who wanted more money, because he thought he had given Edward one zero too many (20 000 instead of 2 000).", can we conclude that "Doctor Perennial's brother was famous for his puddles."?
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Jon continued to examine him instead.", can we conclude that "Jon pretended to examine him."?
****
Answer:
no