Premise:
"and cannot accept the principle of external interference in a state's affairs whatever regime it may have, especially when that intervention lacks any international cover or consensus."
Hypothesis: We cannot accept principles based on those of external interference in regards to whatever regime the state's affair may have.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: The building's exterior, interior and exhibit displays are triumphs of design and harmony between old and new, East and West, simplicity and complexity. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The building's exterior features mossy gardens and shiny steel."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "yeah you know and it's not for uh not for protection or hunting or or anything just you know for all those reasons just you know nobody thinks anything about having a gun it's no big deal", can we conclude that "Guns are not just for hunting."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: It dies, of course.

Sentence B: It is subject to death, as you would expect.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Makes you wonder why no one thought of it before.
I wonder why no one thought of it before
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
The band is a revival of the Ottoman military band that accompanied the sultans' armies on their campaigns and led the victory processions through the conquered cities.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Ottoman military band would join the sultan's armies on their conquests.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes