Question:
Based on the premise "EPA employed the Argonne National Laboratory's AMIGA modeling system to evaluate the impact of capping emissions under the four different technology scenarios.", can we conclude that "There are four separate technology scenarios that are part of the assessment."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: In fact, the White House says that when the FBI briefed National Security Council staffers on the subject, the FBI told the staffers specifically not to pass information to higher-ups.

Sentence B: The FBI can be really shady with their practices.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Anyone with a nose for cooked quotes should be able to detect the distinct odor of journalistic jambalaya coming from Hatfield's book.
Anyone who can detect good quotes should find one in Hatfield's book.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Slim stepped out and approached.

Here is a hypothesis:
Slim was shy and stayed back.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: well he's yeah he's been gone for about seven months now we're expecting him to be getting home here before too much longer hopefully

Sentence 2: They sent him back after a month.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"To some, the instance was clearly not an application of the case study method, because we do not know if the instances are representative of the universe, and there doesn't appear to be enough done at each site."
Hypothesis: The instance was obviously and very clearly a perfect application of the case study method.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no