input question: On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "Bad"???
output answer: 1

On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "This is my new favorite app for getting access my remote servers. Installs a full openssh (with ed25519 support etc.) and has a familiar apt interface to packages. The cntrl (Volume down) integration is genius. Just like having a Debian shell on you phone. Highly recommend. Note: If you're hit JuiceSSH's limited cipher and key algorithm wall and need a real ssh client this is it. Aside from everything else it let's you do...."
----
Answer: 5

Q: On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "Sardar Rizwan Dogar"
A: 5

Question: On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "K Kirankharvi"
Answer: 5

[Q]: On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "This works great so far. Any plans for support of Q branch direct sampling for HF reception on RTL SDR? Maybe the option is there and I missed it. Great app keep up the great work."
****
[A]: 5

Problem: Given the question: On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "The crapiest app ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The answer is:
1