Premise:
"One specific area of consensus among Task Force members was that all LSC reconfiguration criteria should be codified into one document."
Hypothesis: Task Force members cannot reach a consensus on anything.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: Build environment Engineering Manufacturing Production (all rate tooling) (1st set of production tooling) If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The product is an electric car."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Duke Cosimo had Vasari design it in 1560 as a series of government offices (hence its name), a mint for the city's florin, and workshops for the Medici's craftsmen.", can we conclude that "Vasari designed a series of buildings for Duke Cosimo in 1560."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: GPRA calls for phased implementation so that selected pilot projects in the agencies can develop experience from implementing GPRA requirements in fiscal years 1994 through 1996 before implementation is required for all agencies.

Sentence B: GPRA is completely against implementing the project by all means.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: If both know nothing about Monica, then both are happy.
If they are unaware of Monica, they are both fine.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
The Weekly Standard 's John Podhoretz compares Horowitz's conversion to conservatism to Whittaker Chambers' magisterial tale of apostasy, Witness . Leftists dismiss the book as score-settling and name-calling.

Here is a hypothesis:
Mr. Podhoretz could not find anything to compare Horowitz's conversion to.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no