Given an Amazon customer review, write a title for the review. The preferred titles are under fifteen words.

Q: I have purchased almost a dozen NAS devices for SAN backups and most of them have been quite solid. For disaster recovery purposes, I have my SAN contents copied to two NAS units per volume for failover, with one set of NAS units always off-site. This Sonnet looked like a good buy and I, too, was happy with the look. With five 750GB SATA hard drives mine is a 3TB solution using disk striping and keeping one drive as a spare. One issue with this unit is that, while it uses a multipath 3124 chip, only on Windows Server 2003 can you implement software based RAID-5. On XP you are limited to disk striping or mirroring using Disk Manager in Windows after your've made these PASS-THRU disks. The biggest problem with this unit, however, is the poorly designed drive caddies and back-plane. These disks are removable, but they shouldn't be since the connection to the backplane is so 'iffy'. In fact, if I move this unit from one location to another I have to always re-seat one or more drives before the SATA card on the server or workstation can see it. Unless you are willing to play with the drives, popping them in and out until you get a good connection with the backplane, I would pass on this unit. Much more reliable units are the MicroNet SR4 (4TB) SATA units available for under $800. They can take a lot more handling because the drives are integral to the unit. This means if a drive fails you live with it or send the entire unit back for repair, but I've not see any issues with these, especially if you use RAID-5 with the SilImage Raid program included. An array on these units configured as RAID-5 is recognized by Windows Server as a single volume which is what you want. Also recommended are the Sans Digital TowerRAID TR5M-B units. They do have drive caddies, but are much better built. The trhoughput on these is much better than the earlier units Sans Digital put out.

A: A nice looking external SATA enclosure with a fatal flaw - poor internals
****
Q: Works Great in my smartphone. Holds tons of music, pictures and videos. I would recommend this to any that has a smartphone.

A: MircoSD Card
****
Q: I have the original iPad and wireless keyboard and case. I recently got an iPad 2 and saw the upgraded wireless keyboard and case model. I jumped on it since it looked the same and had a \"Shift\" key on the right side of the keyboard. Things I like: The keyboard is good. Shift key on the right side. Caps lock indicator on the keyboard. What I don't like: The case and keyboard got bigger adding more bulk. Abound 1/2\". It doesn't sound like much, but after using the original case it feels like a lot. (The iPad 2 is smaller than the iPad 1, so this is not a good feature) The case is made of a slippery material. It's slipped out of my hand twice already. I don't like the way the material feels either. Kind of like wet fingers on a dry newspaper. *ick* The ability to orientate is nice, but a pain when I'm trying to take notes. The iPad will move when writing, which can become a real annoyance. The keyboard is made out of a hard plastic which doesn't give it much flexibility. When the case is in the keyboard mode it doesn't have the same stability as the original case. It wobbles quite a bit when I use the touchscreen. It's not as good using it on my lap as the original case. When I flip it around to put the iPad in reading mode it's very bulky. More so then the original case. When I carry the case it feels awkward. Uneven somehow. It's hard to describe, but it was annoying. All these issues were enough for me to go back to using the original case. With some strategic placement of thin bubble wrap, the original case will work just fine. This case is actually very good and will work for most people. The keyboard is great and will let people whip up some really long emails. If you think you can handle the bulk then I'd recommend you go for this case. You might like it.

A:
Dissapointed
****