Problem: Here is a premise:
We believe the bill is missing some provisions -- it should address the allocation scheme and integration with existing programs.

Here is a hypothesis:
The bill is missing an allocation scheme for the EPA.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: uh larger plants up around up around one twenty eight um we've got reports that uh during the night too like they blow off their their stacks from uh the

Sentence 2: We've heard that their stacks blow away at night time.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
The Phoenix 's Kennedy sees it as proof of her utter disengagement and her detachment from the people she writes about.

Does it follow that "A detached perspective is critical to Kennedy's writing, in her opinion"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If Maybe tomorrow will bring some better news ..., can we say that "Today was a great day full of great news!"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"and uh and the manufacturer recommended that uh he gave me uh i can't remember what the solution was and he said just uh wash your house down with it"
Hypothesis: Wash your house down with the chemical cleaner.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: The core issue is whether it is ethical for Americans to conduct Third World studies seeking therapies cheaper and perhaps inferior to our own.

Sentence 2: The cover issue does not include Americans or the Third World.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no