In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Denver is becoming a kicking team. Other teams don't even need to kick them in the @$$. They will kick themselves in the @$$.
[A]: Sexual-explicit

[Q]: Comment: Yeah, I often see the truck with all the dead baby pigs in it, and I'm pretty sure that the Department of Health and USDA would not approve. Does not meet their storage, transportation, and sale regs. Plus, seeing them all piled up is horrific. The driver rolls up the door and boom, instant tragic atrocity right in your face. Haven't seen the chickens and ducks, but I imagine it's the same issues with them too.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[Q]: Comment: "The department has been monitoring the situation and crafting a spill-response plan with Cooke (Aquaculture), [Ron] Warren said." It is incomprehensible that there is no spill-response plan in place . . . and foreseeable that this escapement is probable with any operation. Why aren't aquaculture businesses REQUIRED to have a spill response plan on file, with evidence of the needed repair and recovery equipment on standby? This is about as dumb as it gets. I wonder if the taxpayers of WA state will review Mr. Warren's performance and the responsibilities of his position?
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit