TASK DEFINITION: Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.
PROBLEM: CONTEXT: I think that what the trailer was getting at was Noora's fear of just being another one of William's conquests. I think the naked girls were all meant to represent his past hook ups (I also think the blonde girl in the bed next to her is vilde and the fact those two are in the bed together represents noora and vilde's relationship and how it develops during season 2 because of William). All the sex toys, booze and cigarettes might be a shoutout to his bad boy image and the rumours that surround William that we heard in season 1. I think really it's just about Noora opening herself up to something she feels might destroy the walls that she put up around herself but thats how I feel now watching it back <sep> Q: Does the morning after scene from the trailer of season 2 of Skam fit into the actual story of the season? A: I think that what the trailer was getting at was Noora's fear of just being another one of William's conquests <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else of importance I should know?

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: CONTEXT: I bet it had something to do with her consciousness never really disappearing. My interpretation is that, in the movie, bodies are mortal. They die. But a person's consciousness, their awareness and ability to interact with the physical universe, is timeless and is not tied to the mortal body they inhabit for a while. (That's just my guess. The movie was pretty trippy and didn't explain everything fully.) <sep> Q: What did Lucy mean by "We never really die"? A: I bet it had something to do with her consciousness never really disappearing Q: Did Lucy become immortal? A: a person's consciousness, their awareness and ability to interact with the physical universe, is timeless and is not tied to the mortal body they inhabit for a while Q: So is that what happened when Lucy's brain usability got to 100% or something? A: That's just my guess. The movie was pretty trippy and didn't explain everything fully Q: So Lucy is immortal because of her brain or something? A: My interpretation is that, in the movie, bodies are mortal <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who was the officer in the car with Lucy?

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: CONTEXT: He was the stand-in photographer, implying that, having discovered that his target was to attend the wedding he put things in motion to ensure that he would be there. The women were all employees of his target. By dating the women, he was trying to find some information about his target that would enable him to carry out an attack. Tessa saw the target's invitation, not the photographer's. She evidently let some details slip to the Mayfly Man. Perhaps some ill-considered pillow-talk. <sep> Q: What is the connection between the cases in "The Sign of Three" A: The women were all employees of his target Q: What do you know about the Mayfly man? A: He was the stand-in photographer <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why was Tessa not invited to the wedding?

SOLUTION:
Yes