Sentence 1: See it and you still won't believe it.

Sentence 2: You will not want to believe what you see.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
that they can be adopted by federal agencies,

Does it follow that "Federal agencies will have to adopt all of them."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If But I guess I'd got the hump from standing so long in the rain, and anything seemed better than going on doing nothing., can we say that "It was a bright and sunny day and I was feeling great, but anything seemed better than going on doing nothing."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"co-requesters as to the original requester (see Commitment to Congressional Requesters)."
Hypothesis: There are no co-requesters, just the original one.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: However, once you accept these facts, Cairo has lots to offer the visitor; its main museum is an essential part of your vacation experience and its street life is a sure sign that you have come to a totally different culture. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"You must visit the main museum while in Cairo. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Q: If and and they're very dissatisfied and they're they're causing wars right now and, can we say that "The people are upset with their situation and starting wars."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
it is not possible to tell