Premise:
"Tour guides say the red paste is to spare Hanuman the sight of the goings-on more acrobatic than erotic carved on the struts of the small Jaganath Temple opposite."
Hypothesis: The red paste saves Hanuman from the sight on carvings on the struts of the Jaganath Temple.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: We stayed in the word of God. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"We didn't believe in religion."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "uh and i find ways to to turn some of that back to to others uh and i i guess i i can't see that as being something to really object to", can we conclude that "overall, i can't argue with something that will do more good than harm"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: The Amida Hall of Hasedera houses the image of a seated Amida Buddha, endowed by Minamoto no Yoritomo when he was 42 a particularly unlucky age according to popular Japanese belief.

Sentence B: According to popular Japanese belief, 42 is a particularly unlucky age, and that was the age of Amida Buddha, whose image is housed in The Amida Hall of Hasedera.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Nearly a year after Sept. 11, the Legal Aid Society-the lawyers for New York's poor and homeless-remains, well, homeless.
The Legal Aid Society still can't afford an office location in New York City.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
But nobody had the heart to go through with it, although there was no shortage of people who hated it.

Here is a hypothesis:
Lots of people hated the building, but no one had the heart to tear it down.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell