Problem: Given the question: I am trying to decide whether it's worth it to invest in this film proposal. Can you help me answer a few questions? If you can't, please say "No I can't". Question: What does Louise sell? Movie title: The Earrings of Madame de... Movie plot: Needing to pay debts Comtesse Louise de... (Danielle Darrieux) decides to sell off some of her personal property finding that the jewelry she likes the least is a pair of earrings her husband General Andre de... (Charles Boyer) gave her on their wedding day. After selling the jewelry Louise invents a story that the earrings were lost at the Opera, but when the story breaks in the newspapers the jeweler Monsieur Remy (Jean Debucourt) who bought them thinks he may be held responsible so he tells Andre, and he purchases them back. Miffed by the sale Andre gives them to his mistress Lola (Lia Di Leo) who departs for Constantinople where she finds she must pawn the earrings to pay her gambling debts. While touring Constantinople on diplomatic duties, Baron Fabrizio Donati (Vittorio De Sica) buys the earrings from a jeweler and travels back to Paris. When a carriage accident introduces Donati to Louise he is smitten and pursues her until reciprocates his love. Andre is aware of his wife Louise's indiscretion but says little until Donati gives Louise her earrings which he bought in Constantinople. When Louise pretends to find the jewelry in her glove drawer, Andre surmises the affair between Donati and his wife is out of hand and challenges Donati to a duel where Louise realizes the depth of her affection.C'est l'histoire d'une femme emprisonnee dans sa condition et d'un monde qui ne lui laisse aucune chance. La femme, le mari et l'amant.Louise (Danielle Darieux), une aristocrate, cherche dans son boudoir que vendre pour repayer ses dettes ; des dettes fruits de sa vie frivole. Quand on apercoit enfin son visage, c'est au travers de son reflet dans le miroir de sa psyche. Il est emprisonne. Louise nous apparait comme un medaillon, un beau bijou bien garde. Louise se decide enfin pour des boucles d'oreilles en forme de coeur ; il s'agit de son cadeau de mariage. Le film suit d'abord l'histoire de ce bijou.Louise les vend au bijoutier qui les a vendu a son mari. Le bijoutier lui promet de garder le secret, secret de...
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The answer is:
the earrings

Problem: Given the question: I am trying to decide whether it's worth it to invest in this film proposal. Can you help me answer a few questions? If you can't, please say "No I can't". Question: What items were considered dangerous and violations of rules Movie title: The War on Kids Movie plot: Blame for problems with schooling in America is often assigned to insufficient funding or the inherent failings of today's kids. In rare cases, parents, teachers, and administrators are also implicated. However, all efforts to improve the quality of education are doomed to fail if the system itself is not examined and understood to be the most significant impediment. After over six years in the making, THE WAR ON KIDS reveals that the problems with public education ultimately stem from the institution itself. Astonishingly all efforts at reform consistently avoid even considering this to be a possibility and the future for children and American democracy are at stake.In 95 minutes, THE WAR ON KIDS exposes the many ways the public school system has failed children and our future by robbing students of all freedoms due largely to irrational fears. Children are subjected to endure prison-like security, arbitrary punishments, and pharmacological abuse through the forced prescription of dangerous drugs. Even with these measures, schools not only fail to educate students, but the drive to teach has become secondary to the need to control children.THE WAR ON KIDS begins with the history of Zero Tolerance policy. In the 1990s, almost all schools began instituting guidelines that were originally designed to keep weapons and drugs off campus. Very quickly, school officials began to arbitrarily decide what should be considered a weapon and what should be considered a drug. Hundreds of situations followed where children were (and continue to be) suspended or expelled for possessing food knives, nail clippers, key chains, chicken strips, aspirin, and candy. Kindergarteners were even suspended for playing cops and robbers and using their fingers as guns. Under the guise of Zero Tolerance, administrators have been able to wield tremendous power without the burden of responsibility and this authority continues to be increasingly abused. Students invariably feel despondent and fearful in the Kafka-esque state that has been...
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The answer is:
Weapons and Drugs

Problem: Given the question: I am trying to decide whether it's worth it to invest in this film proposal. Can you help me answer a few questions? If you can't, please say "No I can't". Question: Where does the movie take place? Movie title: Watership Down Movie plot: The story begins with a prologue, narrated by Michael Hordern, establishing the Lapine culture and mythology and describing the creation of the world and its animals by Lord Frith, the sun god. All the animals co-exist peacefully and eat grass together but the rabbits, led by Prince El-ahrairah, quickly multiply and overwhelm the other animals with their insatiable hunger. When Frith warns El-ahrairah to control his people, the prince scoffs at him, claiming that his are the strongest people in the land. In retaliation, Frith gives to each of the other animals a gift, turning them into predators, or 'elil' that hunt and feed on the rabbits. However, Frith also bestows upon the rabbits the gifts of speed and cunning, enabling them a fighting chance against their enemies. All creatures may seek to kill El-ahrairah and his descendants but, with their wits and quickness, the rabbits may survive.The film then transitions to realistic animation and brings us to the English countryside of Sandleford. Fiver (Richard Briers), a young runt rabbit with prophetic abilities, foresees the end of his peaceful rabbit warren during an afternoon grazing, or 'silflay'. He exclaims to his older brother, Hazel (John Hurt), that the field they live on is covered in blood, but Hazel acknowledges the image as a trickery of the sunset. Regardless, he agrees to take Fiver to the Chief Rabbit to see if they can have the warren evacuated. However, the Chief Rabbit (Ralph Richardson) dismisses them, saying that leaving the warren in the height of the mating season is preposterous enough without it being based on a young rabbit's prophecy. Knowing that his brother's visions have always come to light in the past, Hazel helps Fiver gather any rabbits willing to leave the warren and they all sneak away during the night. They are briefly stopped by Captain Holly (John Bennett) of the Owsla, the rabbit police force, but they manage to fight past him. As they leave the safety of the warren, they pass a sign clearly stating that the lands of...
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The answer is:
A Warren.