Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Shoot to kill policy ? Enlighten me .
Yes

That was tried, Zobels killed that with a lawsuit in the early 80's
No

Nope, as that website clearly shows, Coyote hunting is not allowed anywhere near where the occupation took place. Yet Finicum was specifically inviting hunters to illegally hunt coyotes on the entire refuge. He was clearly breaking the law.

And as I said, waterfowl season had never even opened this year, due to low water at the lake.

On top of all of that, the government closed the entire refuge to the public during the occupation. So it was no longer legal for anyone to use the refuge and be on it for any kind of recreation, including hunting.

It does not seem that you know much at all about hunting or hunting regulations. Or the layout of the refuge, or, for that mater, what happened during the occupation. The refuge was officially closed. In fact, it is still closed today. It has yet to reopen to the public. Just take a look at the refuge's website:

http://www.fws.gov/refuge/malheur/

Do you really believe in disobeying the government and ignoring the law?
No