Question:
Based on the premise "The restrictive definition of the USO does not allow a post to rationalize either its cost or pricing structure,3 thus, creating cream-skimming opportunities under liberalization.", can we conclude that "There are no opportunities for corruption within the USO."?
****
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "Oregon's 16 Legal Aid offices strive to provide civil legal services for the state's lowincome population.", can we conclude that "Oregon's Legal Aid offices want to help the rich."?
****
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "no no it's not bad and uh yeah i mean if it's if you can find somebody who's uh you know willing to go out for several days you know and can handle that sort of thing uh which isn't everybody you run across obviously who's willing to", can we conclude that "It's terrible and I don't bring anyone along."?
****
Answer:
no