Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: I'm afraid you completely misunderstood a lot of the movie. At the start of the movie, Hal is already dead (killed himself in prison). Those scenes with Hal (mostly in New York) were all flashbacks. The present is with sister in San Francisco. Jasmine meets Dwight at a party in San Francisco. This is long after Hal killed himself. But to your question: "Why did Jasmine arrest Hal?" It was purely a spur of the moment, revenge thing. Hal had just told Jasmine that he was in love with this French girl and was going to leave her. And almost immediately, Jasmine calls the FBI (or rather calls someone to get the FBI's number). <sep> Q: Why did Jasmine arrest Hal? A: Hal had just told Jasmine that he was in love with this French girl and was going to leave her Q: Who did Jasmine sleep with? A: Dwight Q: Who did Jasmine call about Hal? A: Jasmine calls the FBI <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who did she accuse Hal of sleeping with?

Output: Yes

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: From what I can gather all sensates were born sensates, which is why people in the same cluster have the same birthday and take their first breaths together. It isn't until later when someone activates their connection to their other selves in the cluster that they become aware of them, which is what Angelica does. Will and Sarah are both sensates, who made eye contact with each other when they were children hence their connection, to one another, even though he is still unaware of the rest of his cluster, or knows what is happening. He doesn't make eye contact with Whispers or Jonas until he his older. A similar thing happens between Riley and Yrsa in Iceland when Riley was still a child. Yrsa made eye contact with her at some point which is what connected them and then used that connection to try and keep her safe from Whispers and the Biologic Preservation Organization. So even though both Will and Riley were unaware of the rest of the cluster, it is shown that they still have some sensate abilities. <sep> Q: Will and Sarah's connection A: people in the same cluster have the same birthday and take their first breaths together <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What does being in the same cluster mean?

Output: Yes

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: The movie has altered the plot of One Shot in many significant ways. The setting, for example, is a large city not a medium sized town, which makes it more cinematic but less coherent or credible (though this is a common trade-off in movies). The plot is simpler with fewer characters. The overall tone is not too far from the books, but the opportunity for cinematic additions has been taken. The slapstick scene is pure cinema invention (I'm not even sure you can do slapstick like that in prose writing). Some of the humorous dialogue, though, is true to Reacher's character in the book. I recall some inventive insults in the bar scene, for example, which are the sort of things he does say in the books as a result of his unshakeable confidence in dealing with people he has to fight. He really doesn't mind getting physical as he know he will win, so insulting his adversaries and goading them is a typical strategy. Overall the movie captures the spirit of the books reasonably well, but the slapstick scene sticks out as an anomaly. <sep> Q: Are the comedic elements in the film Jack Reacher evident in the novels on which it was based? A: The movie has altered the plot of One Shot in many significant ways Q: How has the movie altered the plot? A: The setting, for example, is a large city not a medium sized town, which makes it more cinematic but less coherent or credible Q: Why was this done if it makes the movie less credible? A: this is a common trade-off in movies Q: Why does the film have so much humour? A: The slapstick scene is pure cinema invention (I'm not even sure you can do slapstick like that in prose writing <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why do films feel like they need to add humorous elements that are not true to the book?
Output: Yes