In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: The best one yet. As a former Alaskan of 25 years I carry a deep affection for the Great Land. Now a resident of North Idaho, imagine my surprise when I ran into a film crew on Lake Pend O'Reille filming for History channels, "Missing in Alaska". I was told that this was now Lake Illiamna and they would be filming on a public landing and could I stay out of the camera view. Evidently there is not much HISTORY (or ethics) to the History channel or someone at History needs to check their GPS location before setting up the film crew. Reality my ass.
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: $14,000 a year would be the equivalent of what I expect in annual repayments from my Social Security fund. F*ck these rich f*ckers who don't give two darns about any of us.
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: And how can you blame the tides (assuming they meant one (1) day) when the tides were never above the usual high tide of 4.6 metres most days.
An eclipse (casting a shadow, or obscuring of light) does not make the sun and moon gravitational effects any more stronger.
A simple Tide tool would show that. WxTide32, for example.
Maybe it is the untidal (tides but greater effect of spring floods and summer releases) "Inland Toronto Globe and Mail"'s fault.

And the lack of scientifically alert questioning Copy-Editors at the Globe doesn't help.
Please send the reporters and remaining editor back to school over the next months for intense subject refreshers, away from the stale Globian air.

This cursed Washington State fish farm shows why all fish-farms should be land-based.
[EX A]:
Obscene