Hello Jeff A voice from the past. Hope you are doing well. I wanted to gain your assistance to point me to the most appropriate person I could interview at Enron. I am helping a client understand how companies in the US Natural Gas and Power industry are coping with the challenges in their industry in terms of developing and retaining the "right skills". So, someone who could provide an external perspective of how players in the industry are coping with the challenges as well as an internal perspective on Enron would be great for me to interview. If that means more than one individual, that is fine too. Hope this is not too much of an imposition. I'll undertake the conversation over the telephone and keep it short.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Guidance
As we discussed, attached is my "Cheat Sheet" which I use to guide me when approving non-US counterparties that come in through EnronOnline via Houston Credit. London Legal and I try to coordinate our responses but I cannot speak for them and the standards they may apply to approving counterparties to trade online. They also frequently deal with different countries than us. You may want to speak to Justin Boyd. Generally, with respect to most physical trading, except power trading, there are no legal restrictions to trading. Most of the restrictions in this list are with respect to financial products. Physical bandwidth has generally not done much legal due diligence outside of the US and the UK and bandwidth is therefore not open to non US and UK counterparties. With physical power, generally, in most countries they require some sort of power marketing license so I look to the power lawyers to guide me. As I also mentioned, for Japan or Australian based counterparties I wait for David Minns or Jane McBride to advise me.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: EOL Country Approval List
James, I believe the Communications for 2002 should be $.2MM in NNG's Gas Logistics... Anyway... NNG 2002 increase is due primarily to: EPSC $.3 Less Capitalized $.4 Increase in Benefits $.15 Increase in Salaries $.1 Hope this helps. Nancy
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Gas Logistics 2001 C.E. vs 2002 Plan
Mark, I talked with Jeff Stone this morning concerning the petition. The petition did not get filed on Friday as planned. Jeff had left for Tallahassee prior to the FEDEX arriving on Friday morning. They also wanted to have Katz-Kutter (our counsel in Fla.) sign the transmittal letter for the petition prior to sending. This way the petition is sent by the customer and not the utility. Bill Bryant at Katz-Kutter was unavailable Fri. Jeff assured me that they will get this filed today. I asked him to call me once filed. We need to start thinking about the best way to approach WFEC after this petition is filed. It sounds like Alabama Electric Cooperative is the way to approach this. Do we know someone in our power trading group who works with AEC? Might be useful to approach it through that relationship.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Station 13 Petition Status