TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: Luckily Trump will shut this idiot up once and for all.
Lord knows Junior can't.
Platitudes, climate change rhetoric along with a few epithets won't take out your enemy.
Maybe Junior could carbon tax kim juck muck to oblivion like he is doing to us.

Saturday Night Live needs an MC - kim juck muck would do fine

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Right, a man who chooses to have sex with a women who has passed out is not responsible. As a matter of fact, it should be a man's right.
what kind of person are you?
Yes drinking to excess is not good for anyone. Sexual assault is a vicious crime.
Are you suggesting this woman asked to be assaulted? The cabbie assaulted her..she did nothing to deserve it.
Surely even you know the difference. If not, perhaps go to a rape crisis centre or buy a book...learning is quite powerful.

SOLUTION: Sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: But what about Christ's commandments? Not suggestions but commandments. When does
Jesus begin being God in your mind and where is he simply a really cool social worker. He calls his disciples to abandon family and suffer for him, to deny oneself for the sake of him and others.

The 2000 years prior to Francis did not come out of the blue, the massive charity efforts of the Church providing a 4th of the entire worlds healthcare and on of the largest charities, all this before Francis. We have had spiritual manuals on how to have a personal relationship with Christ since the 3rd century!

The caricature of the Church as some apathetic monolithic organization is grossly dishonest, usually found in protestant circles.

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit