Q: Leslie Hansen just called me and it appears the power traders have asked her to review the ETA for trading on the Dynegy Website. I told her we were meeting to develop a policy about the opening of such websites, that we had no board resolutions passed allowing the opening of them, nor do we have control procedures in place about where statements go, etc., so we can control and prevent "rogue" trading. She said before she sent this out she would contact you.
Propose a subject line
A: Dynegy Direct Trading Website
IN: I was reviewing the pictures you sent. You are not only an adventuress but also a Goddess. Happy Valentines day. I turned Pete down on the offer to stay. I guess I'm just ready to move on and this feels pretty dead end here. But I'll try and catch up with you from time to time if I can. Beija Rob

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Valentines Day
IN: This is an email
Dear Mr. Schrum, I attended Sing! last night to watch and support my daughter perform with her Tri Delta friends. I enjoyed the performances of the various groups, which were within the bounds of what I expected. Unfortunately, I am not writing to tell you how much I enjoyed it. I'm writing you to encourage the administration to not take lightly the indecent exposure incident which occured in the second act. The act was beyond offensive, it was criminal, especially in light of the young children present. During the first act, I was sitting on the first row, and there were 4 young children sitting in the front. In fact, at the end of the first act I had regretted that I had not brought Paige's six year old brother to watch her perform. I cannot tell you how glad I am that I did not bring Michael. Even I was offended, and I'm a forty-two year old lawyer (we don't offend easily) who was in a sorority at UT. I was glad I had moved back at intermission to sit with my daughter for the second act. Again, I urge you to not view this as an act of youthful indiscretion. It was offensive to the individuals present, and degrading to a fine university which prides itself on "encouraging contributions toward the well-being of humanity". My husband, Neil, who was a Pike at SU in the seventies, joins me in this request. Thank you,

What is the subject?

OUT: Sing!
QUESTION: Mike, I reviewed the pages to the site you provided. My only comment right now is that the correct name of the pipeline is "Houston Pipe Line Company". Note the Pipe Line is two words. Everything else looks fine. We will be getting back with you on the site access agreement.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Web Site Format
Andy, I have completed negotiation with TBG on the Settlement. TBG has exe= cuted the documents and Louise and John have approved the deal. In short, = I want to make sure that you understand the effect on you. Attached is a m= ore detailed summary but generally I removed all swing flexibility from the= deal. They have baseload obligations of 12,500 MMBtu per day. We can del= iver at any of the delivery points identified in the Agreement ( I will giv= e you a copy of the Agreements) however the primary delivery point is Stati= on 65. That is the location for all price settlements. If we delivery at = an alternate location we receive additional basis differentials for moving = downstream ( Station 85 ) and we pay the basis differential for moving ups= tream ( Sta 45, 30 ). TBG has the right to move our deliveries back to Sta = 65 at anytime, if we are delivering at alternate locations. I want to check= with you one more time before I execute the final documents. I think that= this is a great trade for ENA if I do say so myself. My next effort is to= clear up any issues with Trigen. Frank
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: TBG
Enclosed please find a draft reponse to DEP's "change of position" in the Pompano case. Although we would normally take DEP heavily to task for its eleventh-hour change of position, and argue that the process cannot fairly proceed without additional procedural protections, I understand that keeping the trial date is our paramount concern here. Accordingly, we have pulled our punches somewhat, and simply try to accomplish 3 things: (1) place all parties on notice that we will be advocating issuance of the original draft permit at the hearing (we can always pull back on issues that turn out to have no consequence), (2) require DEP to clearly state, for the record, exactly what textual changes to the draft permit it is advocating (we will also attempt to do this through discovery), and (3) sensitive the judge to the fact that we will likely need to expedite our discovery from DEP. I would like to file this by mid-afternoon tomorrow (I am travelling on Wed.) and would welcome your comments at your earliest possible convenience. Thanks!
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Pompano Beach Energy Center