Rod: As per our phone conversation, the list of information we would like to have follows: 1. FERC Form 2s for the last three years 2. Revenue breakdown: Assumptions made for the contracted period, as well as the time period beyond current contracts - firm/interruptible mix and volumes, tariffs for each type of transportation contract A build up from contracts to the revenues in the model would be ideal 3. As before, compressor gas volumes and assumed sales prices for the projected years 4. As before, the story as it relates to CERA's view of the world 5. Explicit calculation of rate base going forward 6. Employee benefit plan information - funding status, return rates, future liabilities Thanks Rod.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Transwestern information requests
Mark, you may recall my memo to you in April, 1999 which indicated that for netting purposes, the conditions included: 1. The transaction must be governed by a market standard master agreement or occur on a French regulated market 2. One of the parties must be (a) an "investment firm" within the meaning of the law of 2nd of July, 1996, (b) an instituion or firm benefitting from the provisions of article 25 of the Law or (c) a non-resident entity having a "comparable status" The term "investment firm" embodies financial type institutions which recieve and transmit order for financial instruments for third parties. There are 12 categories of article 25 firms (including Bank of France, insurance companies, broker types, etc.) .For example, one murky designation includes "persons who supply an investment service which is ancillary to their professional activity, provided the rules governing such activity do not prohibt the carrying on of investment services". Slaughter and May has advised that they could assist us in determining whether our French counterparty fit this category and it definitely needs to be discussed with the counterparty (and extract a rep from them as well). There are other categories as well. I have a copy of the law if you would like to review. The non-resident entity having "comparable status" is the category WE were trying for fit into without much success. Tana tells me that I have given you misinformation. Perhaps the law has changed and Justin has a recent update. ENA has a Soc Gen master, and we have recently sent a Deemed ISDA to a French corporate (one shot deal only).
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Derivatives trading in France
FYI. Great news. PUC "fixed" the language glitches in the original decision granting ETI its certificate and voted it out yesterday. So we're good to go on filing our final tariff. It's attached. Please take a look and let's discuss ASAP (Monday?) so we can get if on file at the CPUC. Best,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Need to Review California Tariff Pronto
EFCU's E-Survey Results are In! Thanks to everyone who completed the Credit Union's recent E-Survey. We received over 3,000 responses, and we appreciate the time each of you took to provide us with your honest opinions. Please help us congratulate our contest winner, Rick Loveless, of Amarillo, TX. Rick is now $200 richer! You will find the results to our E-survey in your e-mail box soon.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
EFCU - E-Survey Winner Announcement