Question:
Based on the premise "According to EPA's analysis, a number of decisions adopted in the final rule (specifically, the adoption of tiers (programs), the reduced requirements for the risk management plan and the development of guidance for offsite consequence analysis) have significantly reduced the burden on small entities.", can we conclude that "A number of decisions in the final rule have made the burden on small business shrink by 35%."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Recent business projections for Las Vegas predict challenges; tourism revenues must increase substantially to sustain what is already built, while actual figures show visitation as steady or declining.

Sentence B: If tourism revenues don't increase, Las Vegas will have to be closing down its casinos.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: right right right isn't it such such a long running
SNL is really long running.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
i've got a big Oldsmobile that i pull it with when i

Here is a hypothesis:
I pull my big Oldsmobile with it.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: The most picturesque street in the old town, across the railway tracks north of the Fort (an area once known as Black Town ), is Armenian Street.

Sentence 2: Music and dance are fixtures on Armenian Street.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Fried chicken, fried chicken, fried chicken."
Hypothesis: Hamburger, hamburger, hamburger.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no