We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: There's no evidence to prove the believe that when guns are less available, less criminals will be armed than if guns were more readily available.
Sent2: I have a better theory as to why there's a supposed smaller availability of guns to criminals in the UK; because there are less people and obviously fewer guns were ever made or imported to begin with.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: No mortal man has the right to deny me the ability to maintain life within my body.
Sent2: I for one would rather be able to defend my children without the risk of trying to overpower another person to keep the bat from hitting my children.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Or, to put it another way, more guns = more crime, and if we could stop the illegal gun running then we would have less guns = less crime.
Sent2: When we factor in the usefulness of guns for self-defense against violent criminals, it's clear that normal gun owners are at less risk of criminal victimization.
[EX A]:
Not similar