You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: Career oriented? That's the spin faux-conservative Brooks is pushing for why people don't trust Hillary? She doesn't have a hobby or a religious day of rest common folks can relate to? OK, but it's clear to us that that is simply part of her pathology. Climbing to the top of the power-wielding heap is her hobby and her religion, her everything. She has long ago come to terms with not being liked, even by her own husband, and chosen instead to be feared by those over whom she wields power. Perhaps she thinks only then will anyone like her. But it is in vain, for who truly likes anyone who will lie so repeatedly and transparently, and use her power to evade the legal consequences of her actions? Who really thinks the very first woman to hold the Presidency should be a likely felon and borderline sociopath who will taint that feat forever? Brooks does not seem to understand that the reason Hillary doesn't show us her sanctuaries is because they would only shock us more than her phoniness.
Output:
Non-identity-attack