IN: This is an email
John, Many thanks for agreeing to speak at our YPO session on April 24, 2001, in= =20 Houston. The meeting will be held at Enron Broadband Services=01, network= =20 equipment staging building, which is close to downtown. We anticipate=20 attendance of about 100 people. Breakfast will begin at 7:30 a.m., and the program will run from 8:15 a.m. = to=20 10:15 a.m. The subject is "New Trends in Technology and Venture Capital." = =20 You will be on a panel discussion with two other venture capitalists. I=20 expect the tone will be highly informal, but I will schedule a conference= =20 call (probably in early March) to provide more details and specific topics = of=20 interest. Again, John, thank you. I look forward to seeing you in April.

What is the subject?

OUT: YPO Panel, April 24, 2001

IN: This is an email
Hi Dana. Pls research (dnb / lexis) and validate (phone call) information for the CPs listed below. We will have to set these up in GCP. Thanks.

What is the subject?

OUT: Research and Validation for CP Set-up

IN: This is an email
Confidential; Attorney client work product; Not discoverable Here is a rough draft. I will also start on TVA letter. Per my earlier vm, I am struggling with the benefit of a 2 year proposal vs. 7. I'm not sure if we get any "cap" benefit from making a seven year deal even if TVA doesn't accept our offers (benefit would assume that TVA has an obligation to cover entire position which is contrary to what our outside counsel has said in the past. According to Bob, since TVA is asking for specific performance, it may not be reasonable for TVA to cover entire period. I will try to talk to him tonight.). If TVA accepts one of our proposals and then we lose the termination argument, what do we do? Supply? Terminate Again? In either case our proposal for 7 years will likely not cap our damages. Let me know what you think. I'll be in early tomorrow. Thanks

What is the subject?

OUT:
Draft TVA memo to Delainey