Question:
Based on the premise "One alternative would be to turn this function over to the Department of Justice.", can we conclude that "The Department of Justice can take over this function."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: well yeah but TI is up there so that part of it would probably work out

Sentence B: No one is up there right now.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Jon caught Adrin's rapier tip in the points of the falcon wings of his rapier's guard.
Jon caught Adrin's rapier tip with his rapier's guard, and flung the weapon aside.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
And though Bill Clinton proves that people will elect presidents who feel their pain, still I think Weisberg is close to the mark on this point.

Here is a hypothesis:
Bill Clinton is proof that people vote for people who understand them.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: But both the design and workmanship were considered poor.

Sentence 2: The design, along with the workmanship, was not up to par.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"um um action i i guess one of my favorite well two of my favorite movies is probably like Lethal Weapon and Lethal Weapon Two and those are those are like two of my most favorite i mean they're just really good movies and i liked Bird on a Wire"
Hypothesis: Lethal Weapon is probably the worst movie I ever watched.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no