Sentence 1: it is it is really outrageous but uh i mean like whenever i i was growing up and all my mom i never understood this then but i do now but she never would buy me like the new designer jeans that had come out that were thirty dollars or

Sentence 2: Mom would not buy me expensive jeans when I was younger.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
(The same is true for another of Vietnam's most famous Eddie Adams' photo of the gun-to-temple execution of a Viet Cong.)

Does it follow that "It is not true for another of Vietnams' most famous Eddie Adams' photo."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If No model he could make would equal it., can we say that "the models he could make would be inferior to it"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"it is it's expensive"
Hypothesis: It costs a lot of money.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: well it's hard to say i mean while it's certainly the case that things like automobiles and factories uh pollute a lot um if you look at how much pollution is say kicked up by an active volcano uh it's certainly less than clear that anything man can do in this sort of scale of things has much effect at all what do you think If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There are still other man-made creations that are capable of more pollution."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Q: If Morgan went to New York banks and compelled them to dip into their reserves to offer loans that would allow stockholders to cover their margins and begin buying again., can we say that "The action was successful, and stockholders started making more transactions."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
it is not possible to tell