In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
One example is below.
Q: Comment: i am just sorry that khadr didnt get a bullet in the head before he blew the head off that innocent father because his islamic boogie skywizard told him to.
A: Toxic
Rationale: This is a toxic comment because it advocates acts of violence.
Q: Comment: There are a lot of references in the commentary that equate a vote from the young (16-24)
as being of greater importance than one from the older population. This is also implied
in Ms Renzetti's article itself.
But like someone said, quoting Churchill, 'it's too bad youth is wasted on the young'. I recognise it from my own youth. And today it feels more telling than ever. I'm not saying they should not vote, just that age and experience (as we now see as a new trend in the
work force) speak loud and clear and should be hailed, as it often is in other cultures, as
something to look to and learn from. Youth will always take itself very seriously so no
chance we will miss that part. But older people often feel harassed for simply having a lot
of years behind them. This scorning of the older voter is shameful.
A:
Non-toxic