Sentence 1: England will be plunged in anarchy.

Sentence 2: England will never turn to anarchy.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
The complexity of the weapon made Ca'daan dizzy.

Does it follow that "Ca'daan became dizzy because the weapon was so complex. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If It would have been very risky., can we say that "It is very risky."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"From estimated annual household postage expenditures in 1994 are approximately $5 billion, which implies a 2.7 percent reduction in annual aggregate expenditures or approximately a $135 million reduction in annual revenues from household sales, holding all else constant."
Hypothesis: The constant change can be attributed to the steady rise in competition.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: It employs a full- time staff of about 75 lawyers, paralegals, intake specialists, social workers and others. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"They have over 70 people employed."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Q: If Perhaps we surface-dwelling life forms are the exceptions--bizarre mutations of the normally deep-dwelling archeabacteria that populate the interiors of planets all over the galaxy., can we say that "We are not the result of evolution from deep-dwelling archeabacteria."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
no