Q: (CNN) -- Serena Williams came from a set down against Maria Sharapova to win the Miami Masters for a record sixth time on Saturday.

After a slow start, the world No.1 sprang into life in stunning fashion, winning the last 10 games of the match to eventually prevail 4-6 6-3 6-0.

Williams' win -- the 48th of her career -- means she surpasses the previous all-time title mark that she jointly held with Germany's Steffi Graf.

"Maria definitely pushed me -- she did a really great job today," Williams said, WTATennis.com reported.

"I look forward to our next matches -- it's going to be really fun for the fans and for us and for everyone."

The match was turned on its head in the sixth game of the second set with Sharapova serving at 3-2. Williams won the game to love before streaking away with the set and the match.

Williams joins Martina Navratilova, Steffi Graf and Chris Evert as only the fourth player ever to win any WTA event six times.

Defeat for Sharapova means she has now finished runner-up for three successive years in Miami and five times in all.

"It's disappointing to end it like this but Serena played a great match, and I'm sure we'll play a few more times this year," Sharapova said, WTATennis.com reported.

Answer the following questions:
1. What has Williams become with this win?
2. Who else has done it?
3. Who did she beat on Saturday?
4. What tournament was it?
5. Is it her first time winning this?
6. How many times has she won it?
7. Was she in the lead the whole time?
8. What is her rank?
9. Who does she complement after the match?
10. Is she excited about upcoming matches with her?
11. Who does she think will enjoy it?
12. What place did Sharapova get?
13. Is it her first time in that position?
14. How many times has she been second place?
15. What this consecutive years??
16. Is that the total times?
17. What's the total?
18. Who reported on this?
19. Is she happy about the outcome?
20. Who does she complement?
A: 1. the fourth player ever to win any WTA event six times.
2. Martina Navratilova, Steffi Graf and Chris Evert
3. Maria Sharapova
4. the Miami Masters
5. no
6. Six
7. no
8. number 1
9. Maria
10. yes
11. everyone
12. runner up
13. no
14. three
15. yes
16. no
17. five
18. WTATennis.com
19. no
20. Serena
Q: Textual criticism is a branch of textual scholarship, philology, and literary criticism that is concerned with the identification of textual variants in either manuscripts or printed books. Ancient scribes made alterations when copying manuscripts by hand. Given a manuscript copy, several or many copies, but not the original document, the textual critic might seek to reconstruct the original text (the archetype or autograph) as closely as possible. The same processes can be used to attempt to reconstruct intermediate versions, or recensions, of a document's transcription history. The ultimate objective of the textual critic's work is the production of a "critical edition" containing a scholarly curated text.

Many ancient works, such as the Bible and the Greek tragedies,[citation needed] survive in hundreds of copies, and the relationship of each copy to the original may be unclear. Textual scholars have debated for centuries which sources are most closely derived from the original, hence which readings in those sources are correct.[citation needed] Although biblical books that are letters, like Greek plays, presumably had one original, the question of whether some biblical books, like the Gospels, ever had just one original has been discussed. Interest in applying textual criticism to the Qur'an has also developed after the discovery of the Sana'a manuscripts in 1972, which possibly date back to the 78th centuries.

Answer the following questions:
1. Is the Bible ancient?
2. What other works are considered ancient?
3. How many copies do they survive in?
4. is the relationship of copies to the original always clear?
5. What type of scholars debate about the sources?
6. How long have they debated about them?
7. What are they debating about the readings?
8. What presumably had one original souce?
9. Did Greek plays also have one original?
10. Is there a question about how many originals the Gospels had?
11. What type of criticism is there interest in applying to the Qur'an?
12. When did this interest develop?
13. Whose manuscript had been discovered?
14. How far back might it date?
15. Is that earlier or later than when we put a man on the moon?
16. Does Textual criticism concern itself with any books?
17. Who made alterations when they copied manuscripts?
18. How did they make copies?
19. What does the critic want to do to the original text?
20. Can the same process be used for intermediate versions?
A: 1. Yes
2. the Greek tragedies
3. hundreds
4. No
5. Textual scholars
6. for centuries
7. which sources are most closely derived from the original
8. biblical books that are letters
9. Yes
10. Yes
11. textual
12. after 1972
13. Sana'a
14. to the 78th centuries.
15. earlier
16. yes
17. Ancient scribes
18. by hand
19. reconstruct it
20. Yes
Q: Baltimore (CNN) -- Erika Brannock, a survivor of the Boston Marathon bombing, anxiously purses her lips.

Her eyes jump and she is quick to smile and laugh.

This is what someone looks like waiting to meet the person, a stranger, who she believes saved her life.

"I told my cousin last night that it's kind of like the night before Christmas, where you're so excited, but nervous at the same time and you can't sleep," Brannock told CNN's AC360 on Wednesday.

'Ready to go home': Last victim, Brannock, leaves the hospital

Brannock is about to meet Amanda North, a woman who took her hand and did not let go.

The day of the marathon, the two women were standing near the finish line when the bombs went off.

North was there to watch her daughter run, while Brannock was supporting her mom.

Brannock was seriously injured. She suffered bone and tissue damage, eventually requiring the amputation of her lower left leg.

North was also injured. Like Brannock, her eardrums were busted.

She had cuts and lacerations on her leg. But in the immediate aftermath of the blast, North was unaware of her own injuries.

She just saw Brannock, who was clearly hurt more than she, and jumped in to help, offering her belt as a tourniquet for Brannock's leg.

Boston bombings destroy dancer's foot, but not her spirit

"She had heard me screaming for help and she said, 'My name is Joan from California, and I'm not going to let you go.' And she stayed with me the whole time," Brannock recalled.

Answer the following questions:
1. Was Brannock seriously injured?
2. What type of damage did she sustain?
3. What did this eventually require?
4. How about North, was she injured?
5. Where were her injuries?
6. Was she aware of them?
7. Who was hurt worst, Brannock or North?
8. Did anyone offer to help?
9. How?
10. Where is Joan from?
11. How long did she stay with Brannock?
12. Who did Brannock grant an interview for on Wednesday?
13. How did she feel about the interview?
14. Did she relate it to a holiday?
15. Which one?
16. The day after?
17. Who was reunited on the show?
18. Where were they standing when the bombs went off?
19. Who was North there to watch?
20. What about Brannock?
A:
1. yes
2. bone and tissue damage
3. amputation of her lower left leg
4. yes
5. on her leg
6. no
7. Brannock
8. North
9. offered her belt as a tourniquet for Brannock's leg
10. California
11. the whole time
12. CNN's AC360
13. excited, but nervous
14. yes
15. Christmas
16. the night before
17. Brannock and North
18. near the finish line
19. her daughter
20. her mom