In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: I'm a bit disappointed to discover that their "tuning in" will be accomplished in such a mundane way as tuning in to a livestream. I was hoping for something a bit more demonstrative of their unique history. Something like looking into the bottom of a stovepipe hat using magic spectacles and seeing the broadcast.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Top national security aide Michael Flynn, caught in a lie, forced to resign.
Federal courts block Trumps Executive order banning travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries.
Trump's plan to immediately "repeal and replace" Obamacare is frozen by the reality that he never had actually had a health care plan to substitute.
Mexico's president, insulted by Trump, cancels his state visit.
A contentious call with the Prime Minister of Australia (an American ally) concludes when Trump abruptly ends the call.
A tail-between-the-legs acceptance of America's longstanding "one China" policy, which he'd threatened to upend.
An embarrassing display in which he discusses a surprise missile launch by North Korea in the public setting of his Mar-a-Lago club.
Lies about voter fraud and a "massacre" that never happened have made the administration a laughingstock.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: The Supreme Court of Canada has certainly made a big mess.

What they did was markedly foolish. They chose to put into motion a set of events that would set criminals free, to the detriment of everyday citizens, if the other arms of government did not meet the strict timeline the Judges imposed.

In other words, they made the egregious error of setting up a mechanism that would ultimately make everyday citizens pay the price for government failure to meet their imposed and tight deadlines.

What a mess. And what a poorly developed ruling from the bench.

In future, when the judicial tail decides to wag the national dog, the tail would do well to set up the needed penalties and reprimands for the individual politicians who fail to meet the judges' strict timelines. That way the politicians, the objects of the court's ire, will bear the brunt of failing the judicial directive, instead of having everyday citizens pay the (too high) price.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack