In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

[Q]: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Restoring Access to Medication and
Improving Health Savings Act of 2016''.

TITLE I--RESTORING ACCESS TO MEDICATION ACT OF 2016

SEC. 101. SHORT TITLE.

This title may be cited as the ''Restoring Access to Medication Act
of 2016''.

SEC. 102. REPEAL OF DISQUALIFICATION OF EXPENSES FOR OVER-THE-COUNTER
DRUGS UNDER CERTAIN ACCOUNTS AND ARRANGEMENTS.

(a) HSAs.--Section 223(d)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 is amended by striking the last sentence.
(b) Archer MSAs.--Section 220(d)(2)(A) of such Code is amended by
striking the last sentence.
(c) Health Flexible Spending Arrangements and Health Reimbursement
Arrangements.--Section 106 of such Code is amended by striking
subsection (f).
(d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall
apply to expenses incurred after December 31, 2016.

TITLE II--HEALTH CARE SECURITY ACT OF 2016

SEC. 201. SHORT TITLE.

This title may be cited as the ''Health Care Security Act of
2016''.

SEC. 202. ALLOW BOTH SPOUSES TO MAKE CATCH-UP CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SAME
HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT.

(a) In General.--Section 223(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 is amended to read as follows:
''(5) Special rule for married individuals with family
coverage.--
''(A) In general.--In the case of individuals who
are married to each other, if both spouses are eligible
individuals and either spouse has family coverage under
a high deductible health plan as of the first day of
any month--
''(i) the limitation under paragraph (1)
shall be applied by not taking into account any
other high deductible health plan coverage of
either spouse (and if such spouses both have
family coverage under separate high deductible
health plans, only one such coverage shall be
taken into account),
''(ii) such limitation (after application
of clause (i)) shall be reduced by the
aggregate amount paid to Archer MSAs of such
spouses for the taxable year, and
''(iii) such limitation (after application
of clauses (i) and (ii)) shall be divided
equally between such spouses unless they agree
on a different division.
''(B) Treatment of additional contribution
amounts.--If both spouses referred to in subparagraph
(A) have attained age 55 before the close of the
taxable year, the limitation referred to in
subparagraph (A)(iii) which is subject to division
between the spouses shall include the additional
contribution amounts determined under paragraph (3) for
both spouses. In any other case, any additional
contribution amount determined under paragraph (3)
shall not be taken into account under subparagraph
(A)(iii) and shall not be subject to division between
the spouses.''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2016.

SEC. 203. SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN MEDICAL EXPENSES INCURRED BEFORE
ESTABLISHMENT OF HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT.

(a) In General.--Section 223(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
''(D) Treatment of certain medical expenses
incurred before establishment of account.--If a health
savings account is established during the 60-day period
beginning on the date that coverage of the account
beneficiary under a high deductible health plan begins,
then, solely for purposes of determining whether an
amount paid is used for a qualified medical expense,
such account shall be treated as having been
established on the date that such coverage begins.''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply
with respect to coverage beginning after December 31, 2016.

SEC. 204. MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTION LIMIT TO HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT
INCREASED TO AMOUNT OF DEDUCTIBLE AND OUT-OF-POCKET
LIMITATION.

(a) Self-Only Coverage.--Section 223(b)(2)(A) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ''$2,250'' and inserting
''the amount in effect under subsection (c)(2)(A)(ii)(I)''.
(b) Family Coverage.--Section 223(b)(2)(B) of such Code is amended
by striking ''$4,500'' and inserting ''the amount in effect under
subsection (c)(2)(A)(ii)(II)''.
(c) Conforming Amendments.--Section 223(g)(1) of such Code is
amended--
(1) by striking ''subsections (b)(2) and'' both places it
appears and inserting ''subsection'', and
(2) by striking ''determined by'' in subparagraph (B)
thereof and all that follows through '''calendar year 2003'.''
and inserting ''determined by substituting 'calendar year 2003'
for 'calendar year 1992' in subparagraph (B) thereof .''.
(d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2016.

TITLE III--PROTECTING TAXPAYERS BY RECOVERING IMPROPER OBAMACARE
SUBSIDY OVERPAYMENTS ACT

SEC. 301. SHORT TITLE.

This title may be cited as the ''Protecting Taxpayers by Recovering
Improper Obamacare Subsidy Overpayments Act''.

SEC. 302. RECOVERY OF IMPROPER OVERPAYMENTS RESULTING FROM CERTAIN
FEDERALLY SUBSIDIZED HEALTH INSURANCE.

(a) In General.--Section 36B(f)(2)(B)(i) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
''(i) In general.--In the case of a
taxpayer whose household income is less than
300 percent of the poverty line for the size of
the family involved for the taxable year, the
amount of the increase under subparagraph (A)
shall in no event exceed the applicable dollar
amount determined in accordance with the
following table (one-half of such amount in the
case of a taxpayer whose tax is determined
under section 1(c) for the taxable year):

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
''If the household income (expressed as a
percent of poverty line) is: The applicable dollar amount is:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Less than 200%............................... $600
At least 200% but less than 250%............. $1,500
At least 250% but less than 300%............. $3,000.''.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2016.

Passed the House of Representatives July 6, 2016.

Attest:

KAREN L. HAAS,

Clerk.
[A]: Restoring Access to Medication and Improving Health Savings Act of 2016 This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to modify the rules that apply to health savings accounts (HSAs) and overpayments of subsidies under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Restoring Access to Medication Act of 2016 The bill repeals provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, as added by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, that limit payments for medications from HSAs, medical savings accounts, and health flexible spending arrangements to only prescription drugs or insulin (thus allowing distributions from such accounts for over-the-counter drugs). Health Care Security Act of 2016 The bill modifies the rules for HSAs with respect to catch-up contributions for married couples, medical expenses incurred before an HSA is established, and contribution limits. If both spouses of a married couple have family coverage under a high deductible health plan, each spouse may make catch-up contributions to the same HSA. (Catch-up contributions are additional contributions which individuals who are at least 55 years of age may make to an HSA.) If an HSA is established within 60 days of the beginning of coverage under a high deductible health plan, any distribution from the HSA used to pay a qualified medical expense incurred during that 60-day period after the health coverage began is excludible from gross income. (Under current law, the medical expense must be incurred on or after the date that the HSA is established.) The bill increases the maximum contribution limits for HSAs to equal the maximum for the sum of the annual deductible and out-of-pocket expenses that may be required to be paid for covered benefits under a high deductible health plan. Protecting Taxpayers by Recovering Improper Obamacare Subsidy Overpayments Act The bill eliminates the limitation on the increase in tax imposed upon certain low-income families for advance payments of the tax credit for health insurance premium assistance that exceed the allowable amount of such credit.

[Q]: SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO UNITED STATES INSULAR POSSESSION PROGRAM.

(a) Production Certificates.--The additional U.S. Note 5(h) to
chapter 91 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is
amended--
(1) by amending subparagraphs (i) and (ii) to read as
follows:
''(i) In the case of each calendar quarter beginning after January 1,
2002, and before January 1, 2016, the Secretaries jointly,
shall:
''(A) verify for the preceding calendar quarter both the wages
paid by each producer to permanent residents of the
insular possessions (including the value of any fringe
benefits) and the total quantity and value of watches
produced in the insular possessions and imported into
the customs territory of the United States; and
''(B) issue to each producer (not later than 30 days after the
end of the calendar quarter) a certificate for the
applicable amount.
''(ii) For purposes of subparagraph (i), except as provided in
subparagraphs (iii) and (iv), the term 'applicable amount'
means an amount equal to the sum of:
''(A) 90 percent of the producer's creditable wages (including
the value of any fringe benefits) on watch assembly
during the preceding calendar quarter (but only the
first 300,000 units per calendar year); plus
''(B) the applicable graduated declining percentage (determined
each year by the Secretaries) of the producer's
creditable wages (including the value of any fringe
benefits) on the assembly during the preceding calendar
quarter for units in excess of 300,000 that calendar
year, but not in excess of 750,000 that calendar year;
plus
''(C) the difference between the duties that would have been
due on the producer's watches (excluding digital
watches) imported into the customs territory of the
United States during the preceding quarter if they had
been imported from a country eligible for normal trade
relations subject to duty at the rates set forth in
column 1 under this chapter that were in effect on
January 1, 2001, and the duties that would have been
due on those watches if they had been imported from the
same country under the tariffs in effect for the
preceding calendar quarter.''; and
(2) by amending subparagraph (v) to read as follows:
''(v)(A) Any certificate issued under subparagraph (i) shall entitle
the certificate holder to secure the refund of duties equal to
the face value of the certificate on watches, watch movements
and, with the exception of discrete cases, parts therefor
imported into the customs territory of the United States by the
certificate holder. Such refunds shall be made under
regulations issued by the Treasury Department. Not more than 5
percent of such refunds may be retained as a reimbursement to
the Customs Service for the administrative costs of making the
refunds. If the Secretary of the Treasury determines that there
is an insufficient level of duties from watch and watch-related
tariffs, the Secretary may authorize refunds of duties
collected on jewelry under chapter 71 or any other duties that
the Secretary determines are appropriate.
''(B) At the election of the certificate holder and upon making the
certification described in this clause, the Secretary of the
Treasury shall pay to the holder the face value of the
certificate, less the value of (1) any duty refund claimed by
the holder under the certificate, plus (2) a discount of not
more than 2 percent of the face value of the certificate, as
determined by the Secretary of the Treasury. A certificate
holder shall not be eligible for direct payment under this
clause unless the certificate holder certifies to the
Secretaries that the funds received will be reinvested or
utilized to support and continue employment in the Virgin
Islands.
''(C) The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to make the payments
provided for in clause (B) from duties collected on watches,
watch movements and, with the exception of discrete cases,
parts therefor. If such duties are insufficient, the Secretary
of the Treasury is authorized to make those payments from
duties collected on jewelry under chapter 71 or any other
duties that the Secretary determines are appropriate.''.
(b) Jewelry.--Additional U.S. Note to chapter 71 of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (b), (c), (d), and (e) as
paragraphs (c), (d), (e), and (f), respectively;
(2) by inserting after paragraph (a) the following new
paragraph:
''(b) The 750,000 unit limitation in additional U.S. Note 5(h)(ii)(B)
to chapter 91 shall not apply to articles of jewelry subject to
this note.''; and
(3) by striking paragraph (f), as so redesignated, and
inserting the following:
''(f) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, prior to February 9,
2004, any article of jewelry provided for in heading 7113 that
is assembled in the Virgin Islands, Guam, or American Samoa
shall be treated as a product of the Virgin Islands, Guam, or
American Samoa for purposes of this note and General Note
3(a)(iv) of this Schedule.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

The amendments made by this Act shall take effect on April 1, 2002,
with respect to goods imported into the customs territory of the United
States on or after January 1, 2002.
[A]: Amends the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to revise clock and watch provisions to require the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of the Interior, jointly, for each calendar quarter beginning after January 1, 2002, and before January 1, 2016, to: (1) verify for the preceding calendar quarter both the wages paid by each producer to permanent residents of the insular possessions (including the value of any fringe benefits) and the total quantity and value of watches produced there and imported into the U.S. customs territory; and (2) issue to each producer a certificate for the applicable amount.Directs the Secretary of the Treasury, at the election of the certificate holder, to pay to the holder the face value of the certificate, less the value of any duty refund claimed by the holder under the certificate, plus a discount of not more than two percent of the face value of the certificate as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury.

[Q]: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Rural Broadband Investment Act of
2013'' or the ''RBI Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act--
(1) the term ''applicable Federal-State Joint Board''
means--
(A) the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
Service; and
(B) if the limitations in the proposal submitted by
the Commission to the Federal-State Joint Board on
Universal Service under section 4(b)(1)(A) result in a
revision of the jurisdictional allocation of expenses,
the Federal-State Joint Board on Separations;
(2) the term ''Commission'' means the Federal
Communications Commission;
(3) the term ''revised proposal for rural support'' means a
revised proposal to establish limitations on study area total
unseparated loop costs of rural rate-of-return carriers;
(4) the term ''rural carrier'' means--
(A) a rural rate-of-return carrier;
(B) a rural wireless carrier owned by a rural rate-
of-return carrier; and
(C) a rural competitive local exchange carrier
owned by a rural rate-of-return carrier;
(5) the term ''rural rate-of-return carrier'' means a rural
telephone company (as defined in section 153 of the
Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 153)) that is a rate-of-
return carrier (as defined in section 54.5 of title 47, Code of
Federal Regulations);
(6) the term ''study area total unseparated loop cost''
means the cost calculated under section 36.621 of title 47,
Code of Federal Regulations;
(7) the term ''Transformation Order'' means the Report and
Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking of the Federal
Communications Commission adopted on October 27, 2011 (FCC 11-
161); and
(8) the term ''tribal lands'' has the meaning given the
term in section 54.400(e) of title 47, Code of Federal
Regulations.

SEC. 3. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:
(1) The implementation of new rules and regulations set
forth in the Transformation Order has created financial
uncertainty and instability for rural carriers by denying rural
carriers a meaningful opportunity to recover investments and
expenses incurred to provide universal service prior to 2012.
(2) The implementation of the Transformation Order,
including the utilization of a widely criticized regression
analysis used to determine levels of universal service support,
is creating significant uncertainty with respect to the
sufficiency and predictability of the universal service support
mechanisms, which has discouraged rural carriers from making
broadband infrastructure investments to build out new broadband
capabilities in high cost-to-serve rural communities throughout
the United States.
(3) The intent of Congress under section 254 of the
Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254) is that the
Commission--
(A) consult with the Federal-State Joint Board on
Universal Service before adopting changes to
regulations that affect universal service high-cost
fund mechanisms; and
(B) adopt policies and regulations that establish
and maintain ''specific, predictable, and sufficient''
support mechanisms to preserve and advance universal
service.
(4) The Secretary of Agriculture has warned that the
implementation of the Transformation Order is having unintended
consequences for rural broadband investment and deployment and
for other Federal programs designed to promote rural broadband
deployment.
(5) The Department of Agriculture has reported that demand
for Rural Utilities Service loans for broadband buildout has
plummeted in 2013, due in part to the uncertainty created by
the new rules and regulations set forth in the Transformation
Order.
(6) Surveys of rural carriers indicate that nearly two-
thirds of rural rate-of-return carriers are canceling or
postponing new broadband investments, while other reports
indicate that rural rate-of-return carriers are being forced to
increase consumer prices and reduce staff, creating ripple
effects for economies in rural areas of the United States.
(7) Congressional hearings have demonstrated that the
approach of the Commission to the consideration, review, and
resolution of petitions for waivers from rules adopted under
the Transformation Order--
(A) is unduly burdensome and costly for small,
rural carriers and inconsistent with the established
policy and waiver standards of the Commission; and
(B) is consequently discouraging small, rural
carriers from requesting waivers and is creating
additional business uncertainties.
(8) Congressional hearings have demonstrated that the
Commission can make adjustments to the Transformation Order to
address the adverse impact and business uncertainties
confronting small, rural carriers without affecting other
categories of carriers or increasing the Universal Service Fund
budget established in the Transformation Order.

SEC. 4. SUSPENSION AND REVISION OF PROVISION OF TRANSFORMATION ORDER.

(a) Suspension.--Section 36.621(a)(5) of title 47, Code of Federal
Regulations (relating to the annual limitation of study area total
unseparated loop cost pursuant to a schedule announced by the Wireline
Competition Bureau), shall have no force or effect.
(b) Review and Revision.--
(1) Publication of revised proposal for universal service
distribution to rural rate-of-return carriers.--
(A) Requirement to submit proposal.--Not later than
60 days after the effective date of this Act, the
Commission shall issue a notice of proposed rulemaking
to adopt a revised proposal for rural support.
(B) Recovery of reasonable investments and
operating expenses.--The Commission shall ensure that
the revised proposal for rural support does not deprive
a rural rate-of-return carrier of the opportunity to
recover reasonable investments and operating expenses
incurred prior to the adoption under subparagraph (D)
of the revised proposal for rural support.
(C) Consultation with joint boards.--Before the
Commission issues a final rule under subparagraph (D)
to adopt a revised proposal for rural support, the
Commission shall consult with the applicable Federal-
State Joint Board to the extent that such consultation
is required under the Communications Act of 1934 (47
U.S.C. 151 et seq.).
(D) Final rule adopting proposal.--Not earlier than
45 days and not later than 120 days after the date on
which the Commission issues the notice of proposed
rulemaking under subparagraph (A), the Commission shall
issue a final rule adopting a revised proposal for
rural support.
(2) Report to congress.--Not later than 60 days after the
effective date of this Act, the Commission shall submit to the
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the
Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of
Representatives--
(A) a report that contains the revised proposal for
rural support published in the notice of proposed
rulemaking under paragraph (1)(A); and
(B) a report that--
(i) describes the amount of universal
service funding necessary to achieve universal
service objectives during the 10-year period
following the date on which the report is
submitted; and
(ii) includes--
(I) quantitative and qualitative
analysis in support of the findings of
the Commission under clause (i); and
(II) a specific analysis
identifying the unique circumstances
and resulting high-cost loop support
required to provide and maintain
universal service in Alaska and on
tribal lands.
(c) Interim Limitations.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 30 days after the effective
date of this Act, the Commission shall establish interim
limitations on study area total unseparated loop costs by--
(A) determining the annual Universal Service Fund
distribution for each rural rate-of-return carrier on
the basis of the applicable rules that were in effect
on the day before the effective date of the
Transformation Order; and
(B) adjusting the universal service distribution of
high-cost loop support that results from the annual
distribution determined under paragraph (1) to
reflect--
(i) the revision to section 36.605 of title
47, Code of Federal Regulations, required under
section 5 of this Act; and
(ii) any revisions to responses to waiver
petitions required under section 6 of this Act.
(2) Duration.--The interim limitations established under
paragraph (1) shall be in effect until the date on which the
final rule required under subsection (b)(1)(D) takes effect.

SEC. 5. SAFETY NET ADDITIVE.

The Commission shall amend section 36.605(a) of title 47, Code of
Federal Regulations (relating to adjustments to high-cost loop support
for rural rate-of-return carriers) to provide that, beginning on
January 1, 2012, the calculation of safety net additive support for a
rural rate-of-return carrier shall include all just and reasonable
investments made by the carrier prior to 2012.

SEC. 6. WAIVERS.

(a) In General.--The Commission shall apply the criteria and
standards under this section when considering a petition for a waiver
submitted by a rural carrier negatively affected by a revision adopted
in the Transformation Order.
(b) Reasonable Opportunity To Recover Costs.--The Commission shall
grant a petition for a waiver described in subsection (a) if the
Commission determines a waiver is necessary to ensure that the
requesting rural carrier is afforded a reasonable opportunity to
recover the costs of providing universal service, including an
equitable return on the investments the rural carrier made to provide
universal service.
(c) Time Limit for Consideration of Waiver Petition.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date on
which the Commission receives a petition for a waiver, the
Commission shall grant or deny the petition.
(2) Failure to act within time limit.--If the Commission
fails to make a determination on a petition for a waiver prior
to the expiration of the time period set forth under paragraph
(1), the Commission shall be deemed to have granted the
petition.
(3) Waiver petitions filed before effective date.--The
Commission shall reconsider, in accordance with this section,
any petition for a waiver relating to a revision to a
regulation adopted in the Transformation Order that--
(A) was submitted to the Commission during the
period beginning on November 18, 2011, and ending on
the day before the effective date of this Act; and
(B) is denied by the Commission.
(d) Denial of Waiver Petition.--If the Commission denies a petition
for a waiver, in whole or in part, the Commission shall identify with
specificity--
(1) any operating expenses of the requesting carrier that
the Commission determines unreasonable;
(2) any investments made by the requesting carrier that the
Commission determines are not used and useful in the provision
of universal service; and
(3) the underlying basis for any determination under
paragraph (1) or (2).

SEC. 7. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act shall take effect 30 days after the date of enactment of
this Act.
[A]:
Rural Broadband Investment Act of 2013 or the RBI Act of 2013 - Suspends regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that resulted in a revised method of determining levels of support for rural telephone carriers under the Universal Service Fund by allowing study area unseparated loop cost to be limited annually pursuant to a schedule announced by the Wireline Competition Bureau. (Thus, eliminates a distribution analysis method provided for in the FCC's Transformation Order known as the Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking of the Federal Communications Commission adopted on October 27, 2011.) Requires the FCC to initiate a rulemaking to adopt a revised proposal for rural support that does not deprive a rural rate-of-return carrier (a rural telephone company that is an incumbent local exchange carrier not subject to price cap regulation) of the opportunity to recover reasonable investments and operating expenses incurred prior to the proposal's adoption. Directs the FCC, to the extent required under the Communications Act of 1934, to consult with: (1) the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; and (2) if the limitations in the proposal submitted by the FCC to such Board result in a revision of the jurisdictional allocation of expenses, the Federal-State Joint Board on Separations. Directs the FCC to submit to Congress: (1) the revised proposal for rural support published in the notice of proposed rulemaking, and (2) a report that describes the amount of universal service funding necessary to achieve universal service objectives during the next 10 years. Requires the report to include a quantitative and qualitative analysis as well as an identification of the unique circumstances and resulting high-cost loop support required to provide and maintain universal service in Alaska and on tribal lands. Sets forth interim limitations on study area total unseparated loop costs that are to apply until the final rule takes effect. Directs the FCC to amend regulations relating to high-cost loop support adjustments for rural rate-of-return carriers to require, beginning on January 1, 2012, the calculation of safety net additive support for such a carrier to include all just and reasonable investments made by the carrier prior to 2012. Requires the FCC to grant a petition for a waiver submitted by a rural carrier negatively affected by a revision adopted in the October 2011 Transformation Order if such a waiver is necessary to ensure that the carrier is afforded a reasonable opportunity to recover the costs of providing universal service, including an equitable return on investments.