Here is an email: You may recall that I flew in from San Francisco to meet with you last September to interview for an attorney position to work on the commoditization of broadband. You were interested in me because I had traded futures as a broker prior to my career as a lawyer. I was sorry to hear through a headhunter that Enron had disbanded the group. (Robbi, I hope that you recovered from your house fire.) To cut to the chase, I have read in the news about the SEC investigating Enron and its derivatives trading with two of its LP's, which I gather was extremely profitable. I wondered if there was an opportunity to finally work for Enron. I understand how swaps work, have conducted financial investigations and have securities litigation experience, albeit all on a smaller scale than you are operating on. I have gas swaps experience as a lawyer at TransCanada Energy Ltd. I worked for the Alberta Securities Commission assisting them in an investigation into a market manipulation. I also used to sue the major brokerage houses on a contingency basis for outrageous acts committed by their brokers when I had my own practice. I have been looking for an opportunity to work with swaps and specialize in the law with respect to derivatives. I am available immediately and would be willing to work on a contract basis. If you think that I could help, my number is 403-241-7293. Take care, Garry Henderson Calgary, Alberta, CANADA - Resume of Garry Henderson.doc
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: SEC inquiry regarding hedging through limited partnerships
Q: Mr. Skilling, I have been attempting to work with Enron Broadband for over six months; indeed, we have an 'Agent' agreement. With the recent market disequilibrium, it has become next to impossible to close deals with your company. Like you, I am a consultant, a deal-broker, a veritable rainmaker. Unlike you, I didn't consult with a big firm. I am independent an am extremely hungry. That said, I would love to sit with you to discuss opportunities of where Enron is going and how they are going to get there. These impromptu emails often work and have even afforded me one-on-one chats with the likes of VISA founder, Dee Hock! I can provide further background information should you be interested in meeting. I have many ideas on the telecom future for Enron that are exciting, practical, and profit mongering. I'd love the chance to speak with you over the phone, on instant messenger, or even face-to-face. With perspicuity and aplomb,
Propose a subject line
A: Impact
IN: Hi John, I believe Ben Jacoby has mentioned our deal with NorthWestern. In connection with that transaction, we have prepared the attached assignment and consent, which is patterned after the Pastoria form. We would like to get it wrapped up in the next two weeks, if possible. Please let Ben or me know if you have any questions.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: NorthWestern assignment and consent
IN: This is an email
Keith: I am okay with the arbitration and non-exclusive jurisdiction language as currently written as I understand that these concepts were previously agreed to between you and Mary. Here is my understanding of the remaining open issues: 1. Whther termination is automatic or elective on bankruptcy. You are considering our request to make it elective. 2. Loss vs. Market Quotation. We are considering whther we can accept your proposed language. 3. Time period for posting collateral. You are considering how long you need. 4. Cash collateral. I am checking with our office in Canada about this. 5. MAC clause - you are considering whther this should be an Additional Termination Event with the ability to cure by posting collateral or an event that reduces the collateral threshold to zero. 6. Default rate definition - Ed is considering what we can accept in lieu of the ISDA definition. 7. No Fault Termination - we are considering whether we can accept this. 8. Credit thresholds and Rounding amounts - you and Ed to discuss. 9. Acceptable LC Issuers - Ed to consider whther limiting it to US and Schedule 1Canadian banks with a certain credit rating is sufficient with language that the parties can agree to add foreign banks. Let me know if I misstated and of the above issues. Thanks.

What is the subject?

OUT: ISDA Matters
QUESTION: Russell: Here is what their letter should say to us: Reference is made to the Guaranty Agreement dated as of September 1, 1998 from American Central Gas Companies, Inc. ("Guarantor") for the benefit of Enron North America Corp. ("Enron"). By letter addressed to you dated April 6, 2000 (the "Termination Letter"), Guarantor terminated its obligations under the Guaranty. The purpose of this letter is to notify Enron that such Termination Letter is null and void such that no termination of the Guaranty by Guarantor has occurred. In addition, Guarantor hereby agrees to amend the Guaranty by (1) changing the amount set forth in Section 1(b) from $1,000,000 to $2,000,000 and (2) by changing the text of the fourth paragraph in Section 6 to read as follows: "This Guaranty shall terminate on the date (such date being the "Termination Date") that is the earlier of (a) July __, 2000 or (b)
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: American Central
IN: Hello- For my own use, I put together the attached list of outstanding DMS requests and plan to do so at the end of each week. It occurred to me that perhaps this spreadsheet would be a helpful tool for all of you to see as well. If you have any additions/corrections (my apologies for any mistakes! ), please let me know. Also, please let me know if you would like me to forward to you an updated spreadsheet like this on a weekly basis. Note: I only pulled "Need Further Documentation" requests from bankruptcy forward. Thanks!

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
Outstanding DMS requests - week ending June 21