QUESTION: Premise: "A woman peeks outside a set of archaic wooden doors."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A woman checks to see if the mail man is outside her window." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. Peeks does not necessarily imply that she checks for mail man.
Answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "Two kids with blond-hair sit atop a four-wheeler."
Hypothesis: "A brown haired boy is driving another brown haired boy on the motorcycle."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. A boy is just one person as opposed to two kids.
Answer is no.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A child in blue jeans pulls off a red jacket in front of a mirror."
Hypothesis: "A boy is struggling to get out of his winter coat after he came inside from playing in the snow."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. Not every child in blue jeans and a red jacket is a boy. A child can pull of his jacket without struggling to get out of it. Not all red jackets are winter coats. Just because is child is taking off his jacket does not mean that he has just come inside from playing in the snow.
Answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "Three people are digging into the ground." that "The people are searching for treasure."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

SOLUTION:
Let's solve this gradually. People can be digging into the ground without being searching for treasure.
Answer is it is not possible to tell.