Here's what I propose to send to the parties on the 14th. Take a look, and think about whether it would be wise to do more selling in the first paragraph. I propose that we get on the agenda for the March 1 meeting so that we have some time to approach individual parties first. With your permission, I will forward this to Mr. Dasovich also.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: TW comments on CAC proposal
This is preliminary. I'm supposed to get with our finance folks tomorrow to get it finished. This is ok to send to NW with that understanding. Kay
Answer: Preliminary draft of assignment & assumption
Here is an email: Judge says Enron has to give up documents By Emily Bazar Bee Capitol Bureau (Published Sept. 7, 2001) Enron Corp. must turn over sensitive internal documents to state legislators, a Sacramento judge ruled Thursday, but only after the two sides agree to a court-approved confidentiality agreement. For months, a special Senate committee investigating electricity price manipulation has been issuing subpoenas and gathering documents from power generators and marketers. During the process, the committee has found three companies in contempt for resisting the subpoenas, including Enron, which fought back with a lawsuit asking the court to intervene on its behalf. In his ruling stemming from the suit, Sacramento Superior Court Judge Charles Kobayashi said he wasn't convinced that "the Senate committee will be able to maintain the petitioner's right to confidentiality." As a result, he ruled, those documents handed over by Enron that contain legitimate trade secrets must be protected by a confidentiality agreement. In his ruling on another Enron motion, however, he denied the company's request to quash the committee's subpoena. Still, Enron officials considered the judge's findings on the whole a victory. "We had no certainty that anything we handed over to the Senate would remain confidential," said Enron spokeswoman Karen Denne. "We were not receiving due process from Senator (Joe) Dunn's committee. They were acting as judge and jury on this issue." Dunn, D-Santa Ana, who is the committee chairman, said he "respectfully disagrees" with the judge's decision on the confidentiality agreement, which he said will be reviewed in the next few days by the Legislature's lawyers to determine whether an appeal should be pursued. Another Enron motion seeking an injunction against the committee will be heard in court next week. Enron is one of three companies that have been found in contempt by the committee. However, the committee purged its contempt finding against Mirant in July after the company complied with the committee's requests. The committee was poised to expunge its contempt finding against Reliant Energy Inc. on Thursday as well but couldn't draw enough senators for a vote. Dunn delayed the action until the next meeting. As for the contempt charge facing Enron, the Senate Rules Committee is scheduled to review the findings Monday and possibly make a recommendation to the full Senate. Should the full Senate also find Enron in contempt, it would determine what punishments, if any, would be levied. Dunn said he believes fines would be the most appropriate punishment.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: CA Energy Issues
Q: Subscription probe for list AllActiveMA (larry.may@enron.com:19) This is a periodic automatic posting from the AllActiveMA mailing list. Do NOT reply to this message unless you want to be unsubscribed from this mailing list. Your current settings for the AllActiveMA are: Automatic acknowledgement of list postings: No Conceal your email address from queries: Yes Digest mode: No Send mailing list messages to you: Yes Send your own mailing list postings to you: Yes You have posted a total of 0 messages to the list since subscribing on 10/26/01 15:28:15. For a list of valid mailing list commands, please send a message to ListCaster@LISTSERV.AMUNET.EDU with the word "HELP" in the message body.
Propose a subject line
A: Subscription probe for list AllActiveMA (larry.may@enron.com:19)
IN: This is an email
Tony, the idea we had discussed at our meeting with Drew was somehow acquiring capacity on El Paso in order to access the South Needles interconnect with SoCal. Currently SoCal lets El Paso deliver to S. Needles but does not extend the same privilege to TW. I'm unsure how it would work. TW does have a couple of interconnects with El Paso's system. I would simply say in the memo that one solution to the constraint at Topock might be to get some shippers to switch to South Needles, and deliver gas to South Needles after twisting SoCal's arm and letting us in, or somehow acquiring capacity on El Paso (or otherwise using their system) to access South Needles. Obviously we will need to flesh this out from an economic, regulatory and legal standpoint. I will discuss it with Jeff when he returns. My apologies for the delay. Call if you have any questions or comments to discuss! S.

What is the subject?

OUT:
PG&E question