In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Example Input: Comment: I think that although Canadians act like sheep at times electing this group of broken promises is finally out for all to see.I mean really, Justin the trust fund kid and Marneau the bizzionaire both as 1% as you can get in this country pretending to be for the people,for the middle class is so phony even the children they pat on the head can see though this charade,where is the pail.
Example Output: Agree

Example Input: Comment: Perhaps Stewart Brian you could focus on the facts rather than mounting a specious ad hominem attack.
Example Output: Disagree

Example Input: Comment: It's unlikely that the health care quagmire in the US can ever be fixed. Obamacare was a shoddy compromise that provided a partial sop to the insurance companies and an unsustainable model for poorer Americans.

While it is well-nigh impossible to objectively rank health care -- even the World Health Organization gave it up as futile -- it is easy to see that the US spends more per capita than any nation in the world, and arguably provides worse service than almost any in the West.

This is largely due to a powerful medical lobby and routine gouging of both citizens and insurance companies. Tylenol administered in hospital is as high as $15 per pill, and the cost of one stitch can exceed $500.

If the US wants to fix its health insurance problem, they should start by legislating cost caps for routine procedures. Profiteering through human suffering is disgusting.
Example Output:
Agree