In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Well, we sure are touchy about "words". But real action is no big deal, right? I especially like the comment in the article that Trump's quicker to act to defend Muslims...by sending cruise missiles. LMAO...uh, you think those babies don't take out humans?

And, the humans on that base were likely Muslim. So, we're protecting Muslims by killing Muslims. Said that way, it's kinda counter-productive, isn't it?

Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: During the day I believe he went to prospective houses where he hoped to harm individuals, knocking on doors during the day where he asked for work. He is an admitted liar. He is manipulative producing his penciled writing. It may be the cover story. He is definitely a thug perhaps for political purposes. He may not be who he presents himself at all. He may just be an operative of some type perhaps a paid assassin. How would you like him showing up at your door with your family there - while you are at work. He may have. Not buying his penciled story. He is an admitted liar among other qualities. He no doubt has his admirers and cohorts in various interests. The one's he and his associates have not "mentioned". Gullible reporting? What's his military record? I don't believe his story. He is a bad character for sure.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: That's what the Australian government used to require for someone to bring a "pet" cat into the country. And although you can find an account of it in the CDC web page (2013, IIRC), you'll NEVER hear these "humane" charlatans mention that the worst case of human rabies exposure in US HISTORY--665 people had to receive post-exposure prophylactic inoculation--was caused by a TNR FERAL CAT COLONY in one New Hampshire town in 1994. Four kittens from that colony (b-b-but I thought these colonies were supposed to be spayed/neutered!) got rabies from a raccoon attracted to the food put out for them, and the idiot "care-takers" foisted the kittens on a local pet shop which sold them to different households. Cost the town nearly $2 million to treat those exposed. Otherwise it could have been 665 horrible DEATHS.

Thanks to these "no-kill" nitwits and TNR charlatans, cats have accounted for one-third of all human rabies exposures in the US for the last 22 years (Gerhold & Jessup, 2012).
Output: Non-sexual-explicit