Subject: "Final Sale on Scuba Dooby Doo Items".

Body: Hi everybody, We only have a few things left after the Flea Market last month and we'd really rather not have to pack them! Attached is a list of items and asking prices. We will consider any reasonable offer just so we don't have to move everything to Florida with us. If you are interested in anything, please let us know before Monday, November 26, otherwise the movers will box it all up. We also have a few non-scuba items left: - Mexican-style hutch (the one that is underneath our Egyptian market tapestry). Asking $300 - Antique dresser/commode stand with mirror (it's in the spare bedroom). Asking $300 - Lifestep stair climbing machine. Asking $350 We'll be sending out our change-of-address info as soon as the house closings are confirmed the last week of November.

Subject: "Outage Commericial Review Meeting (NNG,TW, & NBPL)".

Body: FYI, The next Outage Coordination Commercial Review meeting is 11/14/01. The purpose for the meeting is to discuss outages that have a flow impact for the month of December. I will send out an outage report later today for your review. If you have any questions, please give me a call.

Subject: "New York State Electric & Gas ("NYSEG")".

Body: Tom: I'm trying to finalize the ISDA Master Agreement with these guys. We have one issue: If there is a long-term market disruption event (i.e. over 3 days), and we have no fallback price, then we negotiate a price and ENA would normally obtain 2 quotes and average them. Our position is that we prefer to obtain the quotes because if a disruption were to occur, we would obtain quotes for hundreds of deals in the same manner (because our agreements will all have the same provisions) and it is possible that 4 quotes may not be available. NYSEG would like for each of ENA and NYSEG to obtain 2 quotes and then average the 4 quotes. Are you agreeable to this? Sara

Subject: "New Australian Financial Power Product".

Body:
As you may or may not be aware of, tomorrow is the drop dead date for approval of the referenced new product for our existing approved counterparty list. Thinking through this product today and reading through my various emails from David Minns, I have come to the conclusion that there are no particular issues specifically relating to Australian financial power, and my thinking is to just mirror the approval for some other previously approved financial power product. I can't, obviously, speak for you, but it seems to me that that should work for your counterparty lists too. What do you think? The list I am working off of is the list generated for Credit Derivative approvals (which is the most somewhat current list of counterparties who have been issued passwords).