In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: Case study data were collected through interviews and analysis of documentation. Choices: 1. Interviews and analysis of documentation were collected to provide the data for the case study of certain employees to study how some of them succeed to meet the quota in a company and others fall behind in performance by the third quarter. 2. Interviews and analysis of documentation were collected to provide the data for the case study. 3. Participant test-taking and objective lab tests were collected to provide supplemental data for the case study.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: This has made her an attorney general without measurable accomplishment in law enforcement or prosecution. Choices: 1. She did not have the experience. 2. She was hoping to learn as she went along. 3. Her years of experience outnumbered any of the other applicants.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: According to the senior executive, the RAC recommended that ongoing uses continue, but that this stretch receive special protection from further development. Choices: 1. The RAC wanted to halt ongoing uses. 2. The executive requested to remain unnamed. 3. There is special protection for this stretch.
[EX A]:
3