In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Let me give you an example: Comment: It's bad enough we already have all these American sicko's living in this country shooting up theatre, schools, churches, malls, etc., we don't have room for crazy muslims.
The answer to this example can be: Identity-attack
Here is why: This comment contains identity attacks on both American and Muslim.

OK. solve this:
Comment: Absolutely absurd. " No one voted for the Daily Mail. But when that newspaper branded the three judges of the U.K. High Court late last year as "enemies of the people" for having the temerity to suggest that Parliament should have a say on when the U.K. left the EU, Britain really did start to resemble Germany in the 1930s."
Another attempt to invoke Nazi Germany. There was a referendum and it was democratic. What on earth does that have to do with the Daily Mail?

" A referendum is part but only one part of the democratic process. The extent to which the democratic process in its entirety was attacked by unelected tribunes of the people was one of the more alarming effects of the referendum campaign and its aftermath."
What is that about? A referendum is only part of the democratic process? Really what part other than voting is more important to invoke the will of the population. How on earth was the democratic process preserved through court order trumping the vote?
Absurd!
Answer:
Non-identity-attack