Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
Example: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Output: Sexual-explicit
This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.

New input case for you: Comment: How come no Wikileaks of Republican emails? Certainly, they would hotter with the likes of Ann Coulter in the mix; make for more sizzling read!
Sad thing are the "Catholic" lap dogs for Trump: Guiliani, Christies, Hannity, O'Reilly, KA Conway, etc. (Bloggers, add to the list; they are legion).
The list competes with Trump's distortions, lies, personal attacks, etc.

How RCs can be in his toxic company & maintain their Catholic virginity is difficult to comprehend.

I guess they feel they can get this in during the Year of Mercy & be absolved.
Output:
Non-sexual-explicit