Problem: Here is a premise:
Welles was at the peak of his talent in Touch of Evil , but let's never forget what an abrasive, high-wire, self-destructive talent he was.

Here is a hypothesis:
Welles' performance has declined since Touch of Evil.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Here's a laying it all out, helpfully provided to us by a Washington lawyer who just happens to be the husband of a Slate editor.

Sentence 2: The Washington lawyer who laid everything out is married to a Slate editor.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Then you consider it more likely that the drug was administered in the coffee, but that for some unknown reason its action was delayed.

Does it follow that "The action was delayed, for reasons unknown, after the drug was likely administered into the coffee."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If Nor should Congress heed HMO lobbyists and force Medicare officials to renegotiate the 1999 contracts., can we say that "Congress should make sure that Medicare has to renegotiate that deal."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"our estimate of the total number of premature mortalities in 2020 would be reduced by approximately 80 percent, from approximately 12,000 annually to approximately 2,200 annually."
Hypothesis: The number of premature moralities in 2020 would go down 80% if interventions are inacted.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: oh yeah not anymore i mean i i i was raised on Walt Disney films you know

Sentence 2: I watched Disney films growing up.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes