In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Don't cry "reverse racism" or make false equivalencies. Context matters. Saying whiteface is the same as blackface trivializes historical oppression (hello, black folks were not the slave owners/lynchers/Jim Crow enforcers). People of color are forced to assimilate themselves to the mainstream white culture in order to survive; putting on a "white face" is something we must do every day. When a white person dons black face, they are trying on the face of the marginalized other for fun without living or experiencing racism. Not to mention the historical context of blackface. Google it.
[A]: Non-obscene

[Q]: Comment: Sorry pal, but I've never acted like that at any job. I value my professionalism and reputation over a cheap thrill at someone else's expense. So you can stick your comment in a body bag, pal.
[A]: Non-obscene

[Q]: Comment: Of course not. It is not permissible for married couples to engage in sexual practices that would be sinful for others as well. Do we follow everyone if they are headed for a cliff? My understanding is that sodomy includes oral sex as well as the other meaning. The Church and Scripture clearly teach that sodomy is very wrong in all instances. I would think S &M would be wrong, there is nothing loving about inflicting pain, even if consentual. So no, I do not think we need dialogue if by that you mean that it needs to be hashed out what is considered right and wrong. We need further clarification as to why certain things are sinful judging by the number of Catholics who do not seem to understand much of why the Church teaches what she does.
[A]:
Non-obscene