In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Input: Consider Input: written by mark rosenthal and lawrence konner starring charlize theron , bill paxton , david paymer as reviewed by james brundage
i 'm beginning to get fed up .
over my four years as a critic , the thing which has kept me going is the moderate balance of films .
the good balances the bad .
i try to see both in equal proportions .
but disney 's mighty joe young remake marks the fourth week in which i have n't seen a truly terrible movie .
it 's a backwards machismo , i suppose , the urge to see the things which you so loathe ; but i need to see a bad film every once in a while .
and , you know what , mighty joe young does n't qualify .
far from being bad , mighty joe young is actually a family fun movie .
it 's enjoyable , appropriate , cute , cuddly , and all of those other things that i 've been seeing in every movie since a bug 's life .
mighty joe young tracks a 2 , 000 pound gorilla in the wilds of africa that is taken to a reserve in .
. .
california ? .
.
. for safe - keeping .
okay .
a little unrealistic , but who ever said a kid 's movie had to have the slightest hint of realism .
the first half of the movie is a gorillas in the mist - esque hatred of poachers woman - of - the - wild motif .
the second half is a straight up parody of king kong , awestruck onlookers and all .
mark one down .
i 'm feeling relaxed .
it is , as a point of fact , an extremely un - creative movie .
but , as a vetern , i can say quite honestly that creativity does n't count for as much as it should .
so that saves mighty joe from my wrath , although my colleagues and cohorts and surely bashing this film at this very moment .
this is not the film to take a girl on a date to .
it 's not the film for you .
it 's the film for you and your family .
when you 're right alongside your kid , all of the normal rights and wrongs slip away .
the same thing happens when you watch a horror movie or an action flick .
it becomes fun .
all you have to do to enjoy mighty joe young is shut up and watch .

Output: P

Input: Consider Input: an astonishingly difficult movie to watch , the last temptation of christ may be scorsese 's most important film , and yet his most impossibly abstract as well .
scorsese presents the life of jesus christ
, through nikos kazantzakis ' novel , which details the life of christ from approximately 20 until the day of crucifixtion .
jesus of nazareth ( dafoe ) is a carpenter , who opens the film making crosses , so that he can escape the fate he is subjected to , his destiny on earth .
yet , he soon learns his evil ways for aiding in the deaths of others , and subjects himself to a desert in exile , in hopes that he can reach god .
before leaving , he asks for forgiveness from mary magdelene ( barbara hershey ) , a prostitute who is also a childhood friend of jesus .
after going to the desert , christ learns his true purpose in life , and what he must do .
aided by judas ( keitel ) , he sets off on teaching the world his message .
along the way , he meets john the baptist , the rest of the prophets , and tries to teach the world his message .
christ is also confronted by internal demons and self - doubt , as he tries to find his true purpose throughout the entire film .
during the story , judas is the closese ally of jesus : his betrayal , argues the film , was not out of hate , but out of love , in order to allow christ to die .
he is eventually captured , and crucified as per the bibile .
however , as he is about to die on the cross , he is saved by a girl , who brings him to his marriage with mary magdelene .
the girl is a guardian angel who is from god , and who has saved him from his death .
jesus goes on to live a life as a man , as a carpenter , and does not die on the cross .
on his deathbed , in the final moments of his life , he is visited by the prophets , and by judas , who denounces his master for " not keeping his end of the bargain .
"
judas reveals the angel to truly be the devil , and the life jesus had lived to be the ultimate selfish act .
jesus escapes from his deathbed , and asks his father for forgiveness , for succumbing to his last temptation .
visually and aurally , the film is absolutely breathtaking .
no other director has even come close to realizing jerusalem during the time of christ 's life to the screen .
peter gabriel contributes a score than is simply astonishing , with pulsing rhythms that capture the viewer .
the performances are simply exquisite , with dafoe leading the way with a mesmerizing turn as jesus .
keitel , although his accent is a problem , is passionately brilliant , fighting through language to bring the character to life .
the visuals are also amazing .
scorsese frames his movie in a harsh tone , leaving the impression that jesus truly is a man who is having human frailties .
the film , though , has many trouble spots .
paul schrader 's script is one .
schrader uses modern - day new york english to tell the story , along with new york words , new york mannerisms , and new york slang speech .
the film also does not focus on the godly aspects of christ .
there is no underlying message behind the man 's words .
the film fails to capture the glory and splendor of christ .
had it faithfully explored that aspect , than the dichotomy of jesus ' soul , his frailties and doubt mixed with his unmistakable glory , would have been simply spectacular .
the message of christ is confused between love and violence , and the film merely tells us jesus is great , instead of showing us his greatness .
the film is also overlong .
it just drags in the middle , with nothing truly happening .
christ is a confused figure , in the sense that the audience does n't know who he really is .
schrader forgets to give jesus a message , to show that he truly is the messiah , to give him the divinity .
without that , he is a rambling prophet , who the audience themselves do not believe .
there are several moments of accidental hilarity , and most of them occur when jesus is attempting to preach .
there are moments of brief awe and power , followed by moments of confused hilarity .
that said , the controversial temptation sequence is something to behold .
it is a step in an unexpected direction , one that leaves the audience puzzled , until the arrival of the disciples .
it is a simply breathtaking scene , with jesus about to die as a mortal .
it is truly one of scorsese 's finest moments .
it is unfortunate that scorsese could n't make a film about christ as powerful as that one scene .

Output: P

Input: Consider Input: frequency n . ,
the number of times a specified phenomenon occurs within a specified interval as the number of repetitions of a complete sequence of values of a periodic function per unit variation of an independent variable ?
etc do n't worry .
when watching the thriller frequency , you wo n't have to know what the heck frequency means .
the premise , although it may sound complex , is very basic on the big screen .
a new york cop , john , ( jim caviezel ) finds a radio in his house , which allows him to communicate with his new york firefighter father , frank , ( dennis quaid ) who died thirty years ago .
immediately john warns his father that he will die trying to stop a fire in an abandoned warehouse .
when frank takes his advice and survives the accident he was n't supposed to , the two eventually realize that by changing that one moment in the past , they have created a whole new future in which a serial killer murders john 's mother and nine other women .
it is now up to john and frank to use their special connection and save thirty years ago to make present time a better place .
( i told you that was n't confusing ? ) .
overall , i was very pleased with frequency .
it 's occasional sappy moments perfectly synchronized with its suspenseful serial killer scenes .
i usually do n't buy those cheesy
" i love you dad " segments in movies , but this one surprisingly satisfied me .
maybe because the plot is so creative and universal that i believed that this is how most people would act when talking to a dead relative .
frequency 's creepy premise left me thinking once the film ended ,
what if ?
what would i do ?
would i help my own family or save a historical figure from being assasinated ? or stop some kids from shooting other kids ? or buy stock from yahoo ! ?
( a character in the film does the latter with humorous consequences ) .
frequency also reminded me of the fantastic back to the future .
both share that " change the past slightly , and you 'll change the future heavily " warning .
the changes between the present and the past , such as different newspaper headlines or people disappearing and reappearing in photographs , are very similar .
both are also wonderful feel - good family films that can attract to a number of generations .
the only difference worth noting is that frequency 's final scene does n't set up a possibility for a lucrative sequel already in the making .
there are some problems with the film though .
first , there is a major flaw in the story towards the end that is somewhat distracting ( email me if you have seen the movie and want to know what i think it is ) .
the plot must have confused even the filmmakers who frequently ( no pun intended ) switch from 1969 to 1999 while telling the story .
another problem is that the supporting cast , including noah emmerich and andre braugher , are underused .
while in the film , which is not enough , the aforementioned actors steal every scene they are in .
frequency was a pleasant surprise for me and the audience i saw it with who cheered at the end .
even if you know what is going to happen or if you think the preview ruined the movie for you , like it almost did for me , check this movie out .
you may be surprised as well .
Output: P