Question: Sentence A: To reach the salt lakes, follow the road on the outskirts of La Sabina before turning right, eastwards, down a rough lane, at the end of which turn left.

Sentence B: The salt lakes are to the west of La Sabina.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: It was nonsense to pretend that he was afraid of the scandal, as no possible scandal could attach to him.
Scandals could very easily attach themselves to him.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
His views are calculatedly divisive.

Here is a hypothesis:
He is not easily swayed.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: De Kooning's best paintings, from the '40s as well as the early '80s, flirt with refinement and turbulence.

Sentence 2: De Kooning's best paintings have elements of refinement and turbulence.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
A minute staircase led to the Musamman Burj, the pavilion of the emperor's chief wife.

Does it follow that "The pavilion of the emperor's main wife is beautiful, and you can take a tiny staircase to get there."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "'He may want to be close at hand for further attacks.'", can we conclude that "He wants to be as far away as possible."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no