Teacher: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
Comment: It's bad enough we already have all these American sicko's living in this country shooting up theatre, schools, churches, malls, etc., we don't have room for crazy muslims.
Solution: Identity-attack
Reason: This comment contains identity attacks on both American and Muslim.

Now, solve this instance: Comment: The rise in anti-white sentiment is a reflection of the rise of radical whites within the white community.

Christianity is a dark sinister force and for some reason the right continues to turn a blind eye to this.

Until so-called "moderate" white Christians publicly condemn and disavow the white-suprecacists' exhortation to remove all non-whites, there's nothing to talk about; except perhaps the banning of a hate organization.

Yes, of course not all Christians should be painted with he same brush, that goes without saying, however if a show of solidarity needs to happen one would expect that our Canadian Christians would perhaps show their outrage and disapproval when atrocious acts are perpetrated by white terrorists.

(amended from other posters' comments about Islam and Muslims)
Student:
Identity-attack