QUESTION: We will be holding a series of employee meetings today to talk through the merger with Dynegy and to answer questions. Time and location are as follows: Group Meetings - Houston Based - Monday, November 12 Time Group Room 12:00p EFS Houston 500 JFR - 16th Floor 1:00p IES/MES/CES/RMS/Acq. EB 5 C2 1:30p Product Development EB 5 C2 2:00p Deal Management/New Business Ventures EB 5 C2 2:30p Wholesale Services EB 5 C2 3:00p Services EB 5 C2 3:30p EAM / Info. Mgmt. EB 5 C2 4:00p Professional Services EB 5 C2 - Customer Care and Communications - Finance - Financial Operations - Human Resources - Legal - Media Services - Regulatory 4:30p Enron Direct EB 5 C2 We have also scheduled two conference calls later today for our field locations. See dial-in numbers below: Field Calls - Monday, November 12 Time Group Dial-In No. Confirmation No. 5:00p CST IPT/FieldCentrix 800-446-1671 Conf No. 5050607(Reference Dan Leff as the host.) 5:30p CST East Coast & West Coast 800-446-1671 Conf No. 5050627(Reference Dan Leff as the host.)
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Update Meetings - Today
So far I have talked to everyone but Heather. As I mentioned Nick was much = better than I anticipated. He said things were a little slower than he was = expecting but nothing else. The point I wanted to get across to him was to = take the initiative in working with Jeff and getting more involved within o= ur group. Fran was a little unusual. She was concerned about having to wait each morn= ing before running liquidations because we are not flat and she felt that i= t was a bad reflection on the group if we reported late. She was also conce= rned about the Enpower QandA meeting and why none of the West issues had be= en taken care of that have been sitting there for a couple of months. She a= lso couldn't understand why it mentioning your name before they would take = the index option out of the PCS. She just wished that if Bill Crooks requir= ed your approval then he should say so. Finally, while she has seen some im= provement with Heather, she is still a little unhappy with her. She feels t= hat Heather is not doing her part in helping with the day to day routines e= nough, disappears for a while,etc. I told her that I would talk to Bill abo= ut the status of our projects, that we need to run liquidations by 9 each m= orning no matter what and I will address the issue with Bill Williams and T= im only if necessary. Heather's issues I was going to address anyway, so we= will see how that goes. I did tell Fran that she has really stepped up and= become a "lead" in this group and that she is doing an outstanding job. I = also mentioned to her that I talked to you about the work status thing and = she was very grateful for that. I asked what her long term goals were and s= he thought at some point about getting into structuring and maybe doing tha= t in Houston! I was surprised by that comment. Sam's went fairly well. Her only concern was regarding team spirit. Not wha= t I thought it meant thought. She really means interaction between people, = so I have suggested that we go more regular meeting depending on what proje= cts are going on within the group. She also is comparing herself to Fran an= d the learning curve. She wanted to know how she could learn more like what= Fran has done. The only thing that I see as different between the two is t= hat Fran has been heavily involved with the index and Asian options. I reco= mmended that Sam take on some of these "testing duties" and she was happy a= bout that. John
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: reviews
I've located the Gas Nomination information that was prepared for Dec. 01 and updated to include Jan. 02 business. The Dec.01 numbers differ slightly from the initial numbers generated by James Centilli at TW as well as the numbers that Stephanie Miller conveyed in her Dec. 18th memo. These values are based on the nomination worksheets & actual power bills from he respective utilities. Thanks
Answer: Dec 01 and Jan 02 Gas Nominations for ECS with TW
Here is an email: After our meeting yesterday, I asked Mark Taylor whether under the revised version of the CEA there was any restriction on one's ability to cash settle physical transactions. He confirmed that so long as the parties to the transaction are "Eligible Contract Participants", then there is no restriction and our physical contracts can expressly permit cash settlement. Enclosed is a summary of the ECP definition.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Csah Out Option
Q: PVRC'S WORKSHOP ON TIGHTNESS-BASED BOLTED FLANGE GASKET CONSTANTS AND DESIGN RULES February 6 & 7, 2002, Safety Harbor Florida REGISTER NOW AND WATCH FOR FUTURE ANNOUNCEMENTS ON PVRC'S WEBSITE AT WWW.FORENGINEERS.ORG Description You must attend this workshop to help keep your job knowledge useful by understanding the new design rules for bolted flanged joints! Are you ready for the New Tightness-Based Gasket constants and flange design changes that are about to replace the traditional constants and rules? This workshop will get you ready with focus on three critical areas that apply to both ASME Section VIII flanges and standard B16 Joints. The New Tightness-Based Rules Gasket Qualification and Selection Latest On Analysis and Assembly of Bolted Joints This Two-Day Workshop is a "must" for those needing advance information and know-how about applying the recently developed gasket constants and flange design rules. The tightness-based rules accommodate levels of permissible joint leakage, representing a new basis for design criteria and opening additional choices and decisions for users and designers. Attendees will gain detailed knowledge about several topics focussing on the new gasket constants and design rules and particularly on issues relating to leakage criteria and associated choices. The tightness concept is also extended to elevated temperature gasket qualification and selection, and know-how for efficient joint assembly and making zero leakage plant operation a realistic goal is presented. Several industry experts will lead workshop sessions including: Bob Mikitka, Jim Payne, Michel Derenne, Yves Birembaut, Ron winter, Jerry Waterland, Rod Mueller, Anita Bausman, Jim Frew Hildegarde Zeres, Warren Brown, Ed Hayman, Bill Koves, and David Reeves. Attendees will receive a bound collection of the presentations and guidelines and recommendations. For additional information contact Welding Research Council at 212-591-7956 or www.forengineers.org/pvrc
Propose a subject line
A: PVRC Workshop
Here is an email: We need to talk about the contract language for Holly Sugar. Please see Kim Ward about some of the language we have used for full-req customers on PG&E. Thanks,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
Holly Sugar?