In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: What the heck are you even talking about. The Constitution is the Supreme Court's job. To interpret it and uphold it, as written. Not come at it with some kind of activist perspective that Hillary thinks would be good policy. What was she right about?

Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: And the Quran does not include female genital mutilation. Are you also opposed to male genital mutilation? Jesus underwent it. It was ordered by God. It's in the Bible.
So, all Muslims have the same culture, because they are Muslims. Therefore, all Christians engage in genocidal war and militarized rape (as was done by christian Croats and Serbs in the 1990s). All Christians have a culture of protesting at military funerals (a practice one group of christians engages in). After all, they all agree on the Bible, so what one group does somewhere on the planet, all Christian cultures endorse.
Surely you are aware "culture" and religion aren't the same thing. Or do you actually believe all muslims engage in female genital mutilation?

Output: Sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: They should ignore Spanish speakers. Not only did Spanish speakers play no part at all in developing the USA into a world power, they weren't even invited here, they forced their way in only when life was easy. Every other immigrant group learned English and didn't demand their language be given official status in the USA. Why should Spanish speakers be any different?!
Output: Non-sexual-explicit