QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man playing cricket."
Hypothesis: "The man swung the golf club."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: The man cannot swing the golf club and play cricket at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A dog trying to catch a snowball in the snow."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A dog plays in the water at the beach." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The dog is in the snow and not in the water.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "There are two dogs in the snow and one has something in his mouth."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "One of the dogs carrying something in the snow." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Something in a dogs mouth does not necesarily mean the dog is carrying something.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A woman with three young children." is it true that "There are five people in total."?

Let's solve it slowly: A woman with three young children does not become five people.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Three men in safety vests work along a roadside."
Hypothesis: "Some men are fixing a giant pothole."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Three men in safety vests working along a roadside does not imply the men are fixing a giant pothole.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Can we conclude from "An archer releases his arrow while another awaits his turn." that "The archer is kneading bread dough."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A:
An archer cannot both be releasing an arrow and kneading bread dough at the same time.
The answer is no.