IN: This is an email
Taffy: Did HR confirm that everything had been worked out regarding Samantha? Also, we need to do something with the remaining files in Marie's old office. Could you please coordinate this with Susan Flynn and Susan Bailey? Thanks. Carol

What is the subject?

OUT: Samantha Boyd

IN: This is an email
Cheryl, I was in your store on 9/23/00 and saw some Bernhardt furniture I am interested in. It is the Paris Collection Dining Table and Chairs and the numbers are: 346-242 Table 346-244 Base 346-502 Air Chair (4) 346-501 Side Chair Also I am interested in one of the two beds in the Paris Collection: 346-435 Sleigh Bed 5-0 346-527 Metal Canopy 5-0 346-457 Poster Bed 5-0 346-416 Poster Headboard 4-6 thru 5-0 On the second bed I am not sure if you need all three pieces or not so it would help if you could tell me what is the difference between the three pieces. Finally, I am interested in an amroire and chest of draws (there are several depending if I go with a granite top or not): 346-144 Armoire 346-237 Right Stone Top 346-236 Right Bachelor's Chest Base 346-235 Right Bachelor'e Chest 346-042 Dressing Chest 346-044 Dressing Chest Stone Top 346-043 Dressing Chest Base

What is the subject?

OUT: Attn: Cheryl Baldwin Re: Furniture Quote

IN: This is an email
Want to clarify if the Estate has the right to do a services deal with a 3r= d party with our copy of the licenses after the NetCo deal is done. =20 =20 Here is the issue (as per an old draft of the Assignment and License Agreem= ent). =20 In the current deal, Enron assigns, sells, transfers and conveys to NetCo a= ll of the rights, title and interest in and to the software and intellectua= l property rights. In other words, NetCo will be the owner of the Enron de= veloped applications or software including EOL, TAGG, ERMS, DCAF, Sitara, U= nify, EnPower, etc. Enron or the estate gets back a worldwide, perpetual, = irrevocable, nonexclusive, fully paid-up, royalty free license of all of th= em for any purpose. I am not sure why the original deal was done this way = as opposed to Enron continuing to own all the software and just granting a = perpetual, royalty free license to all the applications to NetCo, but I rea= lize we are in the 11th hour. =20 What it also says is that Enron shall not have the right to grant any subli= cense to any third party for use within the field of "wholesale trading of = natural gas and electricity within North America." It also says that NetCo= can't, as long as Enron owns 20% of NetCo, assign or license the software = to any third party or use the software for any of the prohibited commoditie= s. =20 Is trading the act of buying and selling of the commodities? Once a NetCo = deal is completed, we want to have NetCo and the estate agree that trading = is buying and selling, not service or fulfillment. I would like the Estate= to maintain the right and ability to sub-license all the applications asso= ciated with logistics and settlement (not EOL or those systems associated w= ith buying and selling and order capture) to a third party that would have = the opportunity to build a mid and back office processing and service busin= ess around those sub-licenses in all commodities, including gas and power i= n North America. The Estate may even outsource to this 3rd party and take = back a service agreement from this 3rd party as well as some of the future = profit it generates from this service company. This would allow the estate= to get value for the applications and associated employees on a service de= al. NetCo should not be concerned about fulfillment as being defined as co= mpetition. Also, the estate is keeping CommodityLogic and it is much more = valuable as a tool within a complete services entity. =20 I have not heard whether the final purchase and sale agreement has a non-co= mpete or not. If there is not one, then doing the above should be no issue. =20 Need an answer quick on if we need to change anything or if you think that = we have this right as written or if you think NetCo has an issue. =20 Also, I assume that we can use our licenses within the estate and its affil= iates and subs any way we want in all commodities. =20 Thanks.=20

What is the subject?

OUT:
Licenses, services and NetCo Deal