Question:
Based on the premise "uh i agree i agree that would be something that would have to be uh evaluated i feel prior to ownership the uh i think a lot of people hear only the sensation stories of this child being killed or", can we conclude that "Tha would be something I'd have to evaluate."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: We nod to the idea of value-subtraction whenever we fall back on Horace's phrase about laboring to bring forth a mouse, or lament the forests felled to make possible a terrible book, or recollect an experience of working by committee.

Sentence B: We may feel that a tree has been wasted if the book made from it is not one we like.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Sather Karf and Bork had come over to join Hanson.
Hanson was joined by Sather Karf and Bork.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
yeah i know they must have a lot of tourism too but i don't see as much advertising there as you do in the Bahamas the say the Bahamas

Here is a hypothesis:
There are no tourists because there is too much advertising.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: i understand we've got i've got a daughter

Sentence 2: I have a thirteen year old daughter, too
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"But if Hurt has the kind of visage we normally associate with dissipation, few actors are able to combine such bleariness with such (oxymoronic) concentration."
Hypothesis: Hurt is an actor with visage and dissipation.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes