This is the content of an email: This is a very rough draft based on an agreement done previously with a jv company. I'm sending it for Enron review only, since I haven't even read the entire thing yet. I thought you might want to take a look at it to see what you think, and to consider the scope of the services to be provided. As for legal services, one alternative would be to have the services provided by an outside law firm, not associated with either principal. Could you forward me what you received from Clement regarding the corporate guaranty issue? I would like to see what's the latest in that regard. Thanks,

Subject: Services agreement

This is the content of an email: Attached, please find our revised presentation for the October 8th Board Meeting. In addition, I have attached a replacement page for the DASH that Chip Schneider asked to be distributed. The change is a correction of the mill's power service territory. The original DASH stated that the mill is in the Entergy service territory - the correct region is SERC. The Board Resolution has not changed since the Sept 25th Executive Committee presentation. I believe that Rebecca Carter has the final version. I currently have the signed DASH and will sending it to RAC to be archived. Let me know if you have questions. - Matt (3-9166)

Subject: Leaf River Information for Board Presentation

This is the content of an email: Irene: Due to the lateness of discussions at Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp., I did not send any documents to you this evening. However, I do have two different sets of drafts to send to you in the morning. I have an ISDA without an annex (collateral built into the Schedule) and an ISDA with an annex. We have had discussions regarding the use of Letters of Credit and Surety Bonds as acceptable forms of collateral and I may need some additional time to resolve the issues. I will contact you early tomorrow to deliver docs and establish a timeline (if possible). Thanks. Sara

Subject: ISDA Schedule to Master Agreement and Credit Support Annex

This is the content of an email: Microsoft's in-house counsel called me on my cell phone a few minutes ago. He just wanted to let me know that they received our proposal this morning and that they have retained Preston Gates & Ellis LLP to assist them in reviewing and analyzing our proposal. He said they would be getting back with us shortly -- hopefully tomorrow -- and said that his business folks where intent on moving "forward instead of backward," whatever that means.
Subject: Microsoft