Hello there! Hope all is well. Will you be at the legal conference later this month? Would you please provide us with information identifying the specific entity requiring the brokerage account and a brief description of the transaction for which the account is required. Also, for purposes of your unanimous consent or resolution, you should note that either of Ted Murphy or Rick Buy should be one of the two signatories required for opening the account. Let me know if you have any questions. Sara
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Brokerage Account for EES affiliate
Hi Carolyn, In addition to my comments regarding the definitions, here are some other thoughts: Letter agreement: I would bracket [Spawn], since we don't have it formed yet and we probably haven't checked on availability. 2. Closing date should be at least five but no more than 10 business days. 2 (a) Facility Agreement is probably the more appropriate concept than Turbine Contract. Not a big issue if anyone disagrees with this terminology. 3. Make the guaranty for this agreement and the LLC agreement. 5 (d) change 1st "shall" to "'may". 7 (b) does this make sense? Should we also have the right to specific performance? 9. (iii) consents won't necessarily be obtained at the time of the signing of the letter agreement. Should say by closing such will have been obtained. I haven't done a reg evaluation, so I would delete the reg rep unless you are comfortable. I want the HSR risk to be with them, so I don't want to contradict it with the rep. I'll review the LLC agreement next. Kay
Answer: Panda letter agreement
Here is an email: Please remember that we will have our regulatory global issues conference call tomorrow, 9/27, at 8:00am (CST). For those of you in Houston, we will be in room 4793. Dialing details are listed below:
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Regulatory Global Update Call
Q: Please note the following addition to the domestic credit reserve for September 2001: CP: Williams Energy Marketing & Trading Deal No: 773737.1 EOL No: 1852957 Deal Date: 9/13/2001 Deal Specifics: EPMI to buy 50MW On-Peak Power from Cinergy for Calendar Year 2004. Term: 1/1/2004 thru 12/31/2004 Volume: 50 MWs On-Peak Price: $36.00 Delivery Point: Cinergy Trader/Mid-Marketer: Fletch Sturm Credit Reserve Amount: $20,000 (twenty thousand US dollars) RAC: transaction confirmed under Executed EEI dated 2/1/1997. Please call w/any questions. Kortney x30616
Propose a subject line
A: Williams Cal 04 Reserve for EOL
IN: Cynthia: As you know, the Bankruptcy Code revisions never made it through the recent Congress. I understand they bogged down in the final days over issues which were essentially irrelevant to us in ECT. I'm not sure you are aware of the importance to our trading business of certain of the other proposed revisions. We anticipate that the revisions will be reintroduced in the next Congress and are beginning to think about ways that we can influence the outcome this time around. Are you the right person in your shop for us to talk to about this? If you could let me know, I'd appreciate it. Thanks,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Bankruptcy Code revisions
IN: This is an email
Our June 14 dinner is our official final club event of the season. We hope you choose to attend and bring your spouse or guest to this event and enjoy an awesome meal and an excellent presentation. TOPIC: An Update on Harvard Business School SPEAKER: Professor Howard Stevenson, Sarofim-Rock Professor of Business Administration, Harvard Business School

What is the subject?

OUT:
HBS June 14 - Final Event