In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Example Input: To better analyze model generalization to an unseen, new domain as well as model leveraging the out-of-domain sources, we propose a new architecture which is an extension of the ARED model. In order to better select, aggregate and control the semantic information, a Refinement Adjustment LSTM-based component (RALSTM) is introduced to the decoder side. The proposed model can learn from unaligned data by jointly training the sentence planning and surface realization to produce natural language sentences.
Question: What is the difference of the proposed model with a standard RNN encoder-decoder?
Example Output: Introduce a "Refinement Adjustment LSTM-based component" to the decoder

Example Input: The split methods (beyond random split) are the following:

Output length: Variation of the setup described by BIBREF2 where the train set consists of examples with output (sparql query or action sequence) length $\le \hspace{-2.5pt} N$, while the test set consists of examples with output length $> \hspace{-2.5pt} N$. For CFQ, we use $N = 7$ constraints. For scan, we use $N = 22$ actions.

Input length: Variation of the above setup, in which the train set consists of examples with input (question or command) length $\le N$, while test set consists of examples with input length $> N$. For CFQ, we use $N=19$ grammar leaves. For SCAN, we use $N=8$ tokens.

Output pattern: Variation of setup described by BIBREF8, in which the split is based on randomly assigning clusters of examples sharing the same output (query or action sequence) pattern. Query patterns are determined by anonymizing entities and properties; action sequence patterns collapse primitive actions and directions.

Input pattern: Variation of the previous setup in which the split is based on randomly assigning clusters of examples sharing the same input (question or command) pattern. Question patterns are determined by anonymizing entity and property names ; command patterns collapse verbs and the interchangeable pairs left/right, around/opposite, twice/thrice.
Question: What are other approaches into creating compositional generalization benchmarks?
Example Output: random Output length Input length Output pattern Input pattern

Example Input: We introduce a new model for difficulty prediction combining learned representations induced via a pre-trained 'universal' sentence encoder BIBREF6 , and a sentence encoder learned from scratch for this task. In total, this resulted in 57,505 and 2,428 sentences in the train and test set abstracts, respectively.
Question: How much data is needed to train the task-specific encoder?
Example Output:
57,505 sentences