We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: The laws the gun haters want will keep the right to bear arms from the law abiding citizens!
Sent2: Criminals kill people so gun haters like gun hater pilot want to pass gun control laws that only law abiding citizens obey!
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: This appeared to me to be an argument that self defense cannot exist if a gun is used.
Sent2: I am, however, suprised that gun rights advocates use this case to defend the right to own guns, because the case seems to imply the opposite, as stated by Tim.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If this is the case then gun control laws will have no effect on who carries melee weapons, so you argument falls apart because 'the law abiding' can remain armed.
Sent2: Doesn't hold together, though - you have no evidence that criminal arms supply is unaffected by gun control.
[EX A]:
Not similar