Teacher: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
Comment: Damn! Another cloudy day, and it's all Obama's doing!
Solution: Obscene
Reason: This is obscenity because it hints on sexual content that is offensive to the public sense of decency.

Now, solve this instance: Comment: Tides is a leftwing organization of career activists and professional protesters paid to oppose and postpone Canadian resource projects. The Globe will tread very carefully because "it's 2017" and investigating too deep (for example into Gregor Robertson and Vision Vancouver's financial backing from the same organization) doesn't fall into their "progressive" narrative. The Globe writes it's virtually impossible to prove except for the fact that Tides and Green Peace bragged about their influence in the 2015 election in their annual report - they are shameless.
Student:
Non-obscene