Subject: "REMINDER - OCTOBER 24 BOARD MEETING - REMINDER".

Body: Good afternoon. This email serves as a reminder that the next i2 Board of Directors meeting is Wednesday, October 24. PLEASE NOTE TIME ADJUSTMENT BELOW. THIS IS TO ALLOW FOR DISCUSSION OF 2002 OPERATIONAL PLANS. Logistics are as follows: Location: One i2 Place, Luna Road, Dallas Time: 8:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. CST Room: 6th Floor Green Conference Room. Continental breakfast and hot lunch will be served. Board packages are expected to be shipped Friday, for Monday delivery. Admins, if your managers will be at locations other than their respective offices on Monday, please let me know so that I may direct the shipment accordingly. Thank you. Please feel free to contact either Keith Larney at 469-357-4497, or me at the number below, if you should have any questions. Thank you.

Subject: "Viewing of All Employee Meeting".

Body: All, The viewing of the All Employee Meeting today was not a complete success despite our successful testing yesterday. There were several IT teams (your local IT Support as well as Houston based Web and Network teams) that worked together to troubleshoot the audio and video feeds while watching the performance of your sites communication links with Houston to ensure your trading business was not compromised. I would like to provide you some history as well as go forward actions to provide better audio/video streaming services. You may have noticed that the medium for viewing the meeting has changed from the previous IPTV application to a web based application. This new medium has been in the development stages with the production target of October 2001 which was set by business. Last Friday business approached IT infrastructure and advised that there would be an All Employee Meeting on Aug, 16 (today). This didn't provide much time for preparation and testing. During the troubleshooting for each of your sites, the Network team (Scott Shishido and George Nguyen) were able to determine some but not all causes to the poor performance. I will be meeting with the Web (Edward Ray) and Network (Steve Hardy and Scott Shishido) teams to determine what the action plan is for resolving the performance issues. My understanding is that the meeting will be available for viewing if you wish to do so. I will be communicating to you when your site will be able to view this replay of the All Employee Meeting. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Regards,

Subject: "Thanks".

Body: Brian, Thanks for the kind words in the phone mail message. I enjoy working with you and your group and look forward to continuing to do so. Thanks

Subject: "Responsibilities breakdown for clean-up".

Body:
Without Prejudice Here is the matrix with work allocated. If you run out of work or have too much, let me know. Thanks. Any other issues let me know. Please follow the procedures laid out in Kyle's memo. Please set up a file (use a legal file with sections for the model calc's, termination status notes and letters, notes on telephone conversations and script reviewed, release and other agreements, etc. for each counterparty with all of the relevant data. At the end of the day these will be merged with the legal files. Use orange labels so that we can easily identify these files around the office. We now have a directory set up under i:\CES\Estate to capture clean-up stuff. You should save your models or anything else created in a sub-directory of the company name. To get a sense of exposures and contract type for a given counterparty, please see Jason Biever. We have an exposures report prepared out of TAGG with AR/AP from accounting - I don't want this to be widely copied so if you wouldn't mind, just work through Jason to get the 4 pieces of information for your counterparty (physical contract type, FMTM, PMTM, AR, AP). The MTM is from Dec 11, somewhat in the middle of all the termination dates. You will have to ask Risk to get a TAGG run from the termination date. Kyle, We need to confirm a process for handling counterparties with many deals (eg. Duke, PanCdn). I would suggest that we run TAGG, then take all deals of MTM over $50,000 and model them separately. The rest of the small deals we would group using the TAGG run to value. You might want to set a higher or lower threshold. Please let me know. Peter, We need to issue to the teams a termination status for each of the counterparties on the priority list, or would you prefer that groups contact Chris Christopher in Greg's absence to go through the details on termination status (this could prove a roadblock over the next few days). At any rate, per our process, the teams need to sit down with legal before they start, to understand the situation.