Problem: Here is a premise:
they even had somebody portraying Ed Sullivan and it was very very funny i think it was the funniest part of the of that movie

Here is a hypothesis:
The guy that played him did not portray him very well.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: but uh you know i don't necessarily uh you know there's a place here uh it's um it's good it's a barbecue place and it's uh you know you go through a line and and get your stuff

Sentence 2: The place here is good for barbecue and has an open buffet.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
We've done the best we can to keep it from being so drug-infested it becomes a war zone.

Does it follow that "Gentrifying is not helping matters."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If Ironically, it was George Shaheen rather than Jim Wadia who publicly stated his support for modernizing the attest and assurance model for the 21st century!, can we say that "Shaheen supported modernizing the model."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"Mavericks do have problems without Roy Tarpley they're not going anywhere"
Hypothesis: Mavericks are not doing well because Roy Tarpley is not on the team.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: The second thing is getting in there, digging so hard so that they understand completely and exactly what the facts are.

Sentence 2: The second thing is digging hard enough to find the facts.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes