Premise:
"evidence is consistent, no further examination is needed."
Hypothesis: Due to inconsistent evidence, there must be additional examination.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: Do you think they know? said Ca'daan. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Jon was wondering if they knew."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "and that's kind of fun", can we conclude that "I would like to do that again."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: By the end of the 1980s, more than 80 percent of Cuban trade was with the USSR, which also provided Cuba with a subsidy of state support worth an estimated US$5 billion annually.

Sentence B: At the end of the 1980s, Cuba no longer had any trade with the USSR.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Say, Jane, you can get up on the seat now." For the first time the girl spoke.
The girl had never talked before, but she responded now.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
So if all 78 hypotheses are true, then roughly 7.8 of them--call it eight-- should be confirmed overwhelmingly.

Here is a hypothesis:
8 should be easily confirmed if they are all true.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes