Premise:
"Most certainly!"
Hypothesis: Something will definitely happen.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: Intellectual property refers, basically, to nontangible creative product and, like a rising sea, it seems to cover new territory with every passing year. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Every year, it seems like more things are classified as intellectual property."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "She would be in the same spot as many members of the press and public, who thought that Clinton had made a tacit agreement to quit fooling around for the duration of his presidency, for the sake of common sense if not common decency.", can we conclude that "A lot of people thought Clinton would stop fooling around while in office."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: The higher savings rate would raise the growth rate.

Sentence B: The growth rate can not be raised in any way.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Finally, Greece was ousted from its new territory in Asia Minor, which became part of the new Turkish state.
The new territory in Asia Minor became part of the new Turkish state, according to the teacher.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
The newest curators-in-your-pocket are lightweight CD-ROM based systems on which visitors can punch in the numbers on wall labels, accessing commentary on whatever interests them.

Here is a hypothesis:
The visitors have to pay a fee in order to use the system.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell