In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example input: Comment: Damn! Another cloudy day, and it's all Obama's doing!
Example output: Obscene
Example explanation: This is obscenity because it hints on sexual content that is offensive to the public sense of decency.
Q: Comment: Faux history is trotted out to support a predetermined narrative once again. The Cuban missile crisis was in response to the USA's plans to put nuclear weapons in Turkey, right in the USSR's backyard, not in response to the Bag of Pigs invasion. Though no doubt that played a role in Cuba's eagerness to go along.

So why not say that Khrushchev and Kennedy reached a mutual understanding rather than give Kennedy all the credit.

And why mention Chrystia Freeland at all, she has no influence in North Korea. Dennis Rodman has a better reputation as an honest broker than anyone in Canadian Foreign Affairs.
A:
Non-obscene