Question: Sentence A: Indian troops were trained to bite the cartridges before loading their rifles, but some were greased with animal fat and the Indians felt they were ingesting either fat from the cow, sacred to the Hindus, or lard from the pig, abomination to the Muslims.

Sentence B: Indian troops were trained to bite cartridges, but since some were greased with lots and lots of animal fat they felt they were ingesting substances against their religions tenements.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Procedures for minimizing the effect of these limitations require, for example, proper technical advice, qualifying language in audit reports, and a review of data and assumptions by agency officials.

Sentence B: There is no way to reduce the limitations.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?

Answer: no

Question: Sentence A: and and i understand they're doing it because the prisons are full but somewhere we've got to come up with some money to build to build more you know and keep these people in them you know

Sentence B: They're doing it because the prisons are full.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?

Answer: yes

Question: Sentence A: and uh you you know they are O and four but i think they're going to be one and four at the end of today they're sitting here with two out in the ninth with a uh fifteen to three lead

Sentence B: They are 0 and five, and I think they will lose again today.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?

Answer:
no