In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.

with the federal sex offender registration and disclosure requirements created by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) for juvenile delinquents who were fourteen years or older at the time of the offense, and that the later enacted SORNA controlled for these older juveniles, but that "[f]or all other juvenile delinquents, the FJDA's confidentiality provisions remain in force"). 4 . Among other places, if J.D.T. were to move to Montana, he would be subject to lifelong registration as a sexual offender; state law also makes the name and address of registered sexual offenders publicly available. See Mont.Code Ann. 45-5-502(3); 46-23-502(9)(b),(10); 46-23-506(1); 46-23-508(l)(a); see also United States v. Juvenile Male, 360 Mont. 317, 255 P.3d 110, 112-15 (2011) (<HOLDING>). Similarly, if he went to school in Illinois
Holding statements: (A) holding that a juvenile adjudicated as delinquent in federal court for violation of 2241c had a duty under state law to register as a sexual offender when present in montana (B) holding that aedpa limits a federal habeas court to the record before the state court where a claim has been adjudicated on the merits by the state court (C) holding that when applying state law a federal court is bound to follow the highest court in the state (D) holding that court leave under 6322 is not available to a federal employee summoned to appear in juvenile court in her capacity as the juveniles parent as a party to the proceedings (E) holding that the uniform act and mca 259303 are alternative methods for filing a judgment of a montana federal court in montana state court
holding that aedpa limits a federal habeas court to the record before the state court where a claim has been adjudicated on the merits by the state court