input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. CHAPTER XIX.

_The Crisis Rapidly Advances_.

HENRIETTA TEMPLE began once more to droop. This change was not unnoticed by her constant companion Lord Montfort, and yet he never permitted her to be aware of his observation. All that he did was still more to study her amusement; if possible, to be still more considerate and tender. Miss Grandison, however, was far less delicate; she omitted no opportunity of letting Miss Temple know that she thought that Henrietta was very unwell, and that she was quite convinced Henrietta was thinking of Ferdinand. Nay! she was not satisfied to confine these intimations to Miss Temple; she impressed her conviction of Henrietta's indisposition on Lord Montfort, and teased him with asking his opinion of the cause.

'What do you think is the cause, Miss Grandison?' said his lordship, very quietly.

'Perhaps London does not agree with her; but then, when she was ill before she was in the country; and it seems to me to be the same illness. I wonder you do not notice it, Lord Montfort. A lover to be so insensible, I am surprised!'

'It is useless to notice that which you cannot remedy.'

'Why do you not call in those who can offer remedies?' said Miss Grandison. 'Why not send for Sir Henry?'

'I think it best to leave Henrietta alone,' said Lord Montfort.

'Do you think it is the mind, then?' said Miss Grandison.

'It may be,' said Lord Montford.

'It may be! Upon my word, you are very easy.' 1. How was Miss Grandison asked a question?
2. Who was Henrietta's companion?
3. Did he allow her to be aware that he was watching?
4. Who was Henrietta thinking about?
5. Was she okay with keeping this from Miss Temple?
6. Did she tease the Lord?
7. How?
8. About what?
9. Did London agree with Henrietta?
10. Was she sick before arriving in the country?
11. Did she get sick with something else once arriving?
12. Did Miss Grandison think someone should have been called in?
13. Who?
14. What could he offer?
15. What did the Lord think best to do?
numbered_answers: 1. far less delicate
2. Ferdinand.
3. no
4. Ferdinand
5. no
6. yes
7. with asking his opinion
8. the cause
9. no
10. yes
11. With the same illness
12. yes
13. Sir Henry
14. remedies
15. leave Henrietta alone

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. Though Robert H. Richards IV was convicted of rape, the wealthy heir to the du Pont family fortune was spared prison by a Delaware court in 2009 because he would "not fare well" behind bars, according to court documents CNN obtained Tuesday.

Richards is a great-grandson of the chemical magnate Irenee du Pont.

He received an eight-year prison sentence in 2009 for raping his toddler daughter, but the sentencing order signed by a Delaware judge said "defendant will not fare well" in prison and the eight years were suspended.

Richards was placed on eight years' probation and ordered to get treatment and register as a sex offender, the documents show. He was also prohibited from having contact with children under 16, including his own children.

The documents were never sealed, yet the ruling managed to go unnoticed until March, when Richards' former wife, Tracy Richards, filed a lawsuit in Delaware Superior Court on behalf of their children alleging "personal injuries arising from the childhood sexual abuse." The 11-page suit alleges that not only was their daughter abused, but Richards abused their son, too. The suit seeks unspecified monetary damages.

While he was convicted of raping his daughter, Richards has never been charged with sexually molesting his son, according to Jason Miller, a spokesman for the Delaware attorney general's office.

CNN tried repeatedly to reach Richards and Eugene Maurer, the attorney who represented him in 2009. Maurer is no longer representing Richards, his assistant told CNN on Wednesday. CNN asked if he had a comment; he has not offered one. 1. What was Irenee du Pont
2. Who is his great-grandson
3. What was he convicted of
4. When was he convicted?
5. How long was his sentence?
6. Did he serve this?
7. What was he prohibited from?
8. Where was the lawsuit filed?
9. Who is Jason Miller
10. Has Richards been charged with molesting his son?
11. Who tried to reach Richards
12. Who is Eugene Maurer
13. Does he still represent him?
14. Did he have a comment?
numbered_answers: 1. A chemical magnate
2. Robert H. Richards IV
3. raped his toddler daughter
4. 2009
5. eight-years
6. No
7. He was also prohibited from having contact with children under 16, including his own children.
8. Delaware Superior Court
9. A spokesman for the Delaware attorney general's office.
10. No
11. CNN
12. the attorney who represented him in 2009
13. No
14. No

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. CHAPTER VII.

THE WALK HOME.

Mary Masters, when Reginald Morton had turned his back upon her at the bridge, was angry with herself and with him, which was reasonable; and very angry also with Larry Twentyman, which was unreasonable. As she had at once acceded to Morton's proposal that they should walk round the house together, surely he should not have deserted her so soon. It had not been her fault that the other man had come up. She had not wanted him. But she was aware that when the option had in some sort been left to herself, she had elected to walk back with Larry. She knew her own motives and her own feelings, but neither of the men would understand them. Because she preferred the company of Mr. Morton, and had at the moment feared that her sisters would have deserted her had she followed him, therefore she had declared her purpose of going back to Dillsborough, in doing which she knew that Larry and the girls would accompany her. But of course Mr. Morton would think that she had preferred the company of her recognised admirer. It was pretty well known in Dillsborough that Larry was her lover. Her stepmother had spoken of it very freely; and Larry himself was a man who did not keep his lights hidden under a bushel. "I hope I've not been in the way, Mary," said Mr. Twentyman, as soon as Morton was out of hearing.

"In the way of what?" 1. Who was upset?
2. Who she was angry with?
3. Was she upset with anyone else?
4. Did the author find her attitude rational?
5. Who left early?
6. Where were they at that time?
7. Did she agree with his request before that?
8. Who disrupted the plan?
9. Did she rather stay with him?
10. Was she aware of her own emotions?
11. What about the guys?
12. Did she like one over other?
13. Who was that?
14. But did she do otherwise?
15. Was she worried about any of her relatives?
16. Who was that?
17. What was her thought about her?
numbered_answers:
1. Mary Masters
2. Reginald Morton
3. Larry Twentyman
4. No
5. Morton
6. walking round the house
7. Yes
8. Larry
9. No
10. Yes
11. No
12. Yes
13. Mr. Morton
14. yes
15. Yes
16. her sisters
17. unknown