In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: Participants raised questions about whether the SEC should reconsider the amount and targeting of its civil sanctions and more frequently use other types of remedies, such as criminal sanctions, to hold people accountable for wrongdoing. Choices: 1. Participants believe candles will be a great remedy for criminals. 2. Participants asked questions about different ways to hold criminals accountable for wrongdoing. 3. Participants asked many questions about the death penalty.

Output: 2

Input: Consider Input: Statement: The immense monument it would have been the largest in Egypt had it been completed fractured along a fault line and was abandoned in 1500 b.c. Choices: 1. The monument is the largest in all of Egypt. 2. The monument was built along a fault line and as a result was never completed. 3. The monument was far from completion.

Output: 2

Input: Consider Input: Statement: As we have reported, IRS recently initiated appropriate first steps to address these weaknesses via its initial modernization expenditure plan that represents the first step in a longterm, incremental modernization program. Choices: 1. The weakness was never reported because we failed to do so. 2. The IRS is in charge of the tax services in the country, 3. We have reported something on the IRS.
Output: 3