In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: So, we create a crap shoot lottery to fund education? Along with closing 1-2 Pioneer Homes (to save money) and throwing seniors out on the street, if I as I suspect many have no place else to go? All to protect the wealthy from paying into a balanced an progressive tax plan? Is this truly the kind of state we as a collective wish to create? How much lower can our Republican lead Senate drop to?

I have no kids to educate nor do I have any family or anyone I know living in a Pioneer Home (so I have no stake in this), but I do know that I am willing to pay into a progressive income and/or sales tax within a balanced plan to insure that seniors are housed and that your kids are educated.

This is about creating a common sense, responsible, balanced, and compassionate Alaskan society for all, not an everyone for themselves, statewide dystopia.

This is not fiscal responsibility; this is fiscal idiocy.
[A]: Obscene

[Q]: Comment: You hit the nail on the head. What Kurgan and devotees call "humor" is in fact sarcasm and ridicule.
[A]: Non-obscene

[Q]: Comment: El Duque 2, Christians in Alberta are not attacked daily, no matter what is happening in the whole world. In fact they are very rarely attacked at all in Alberta. Someone calls you to account and you call that an attack ... That is making yourself into a victim, can you not see that? As John the Baptist would say, "You brood of vipers!"
[A]:
Non-obscene