In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
One example is below.
Q: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
A: Sexual-explicit
Rationale: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.
Q: Comment: You'll probably get some responses that Trump truly is a "madman" of course.

I guess my question then is (probably not answerable except by time) is Trump up for the bluster he's showing? He does have somewhat of a track record of making overblown threats (just as an example, "on day one I will appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Hillary Clinton). Why is this different? I don't know if I would call it bluffing per se, since I think he wholeheartedly believes what he says when he says its. Reality sometimes brings a different light on things when it comes to a head.

I do think it would be very dangerous for our position in the world to "turn NK to glass" as some others have called it, just because Kim won't turn over his nuclear weapons. The rest of the world seems OK (uncomfortable sure, but OK) with him having them. So someone is going to have to take a bloody nose or else we are going to seem the bad guy if we attack first. Your thoughts?
A:
Non-sexual-explicit