Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

(CNN) -- The British and Irish Lions held on for a 23-21 victory over Australia Saturday in a nail-biting first Test in Brisbane.

The opening match of the three-Test series swung on a few key moments and the Wallabies were left to count the cost of two late missed penalties from Kurtley Beale.

His first effort from just 30 meters out went wide of the posts and when presented with another chance from a little further out, Beale cruelly slipped as he was making his attempt.

It left Warren Gatland's men and the thousands of their supporters who had turned the Suncorp Stadium into a sea of red to celebrate a famous victory.

"It was relief, but we deserved to win that game," Gatland told reporters after his side's narrow triumph.

They led 13-12 at halftime, despite two tries from Australia wing Israel Folau, who was making a sensational debut just five months after switching to rugby union from rugby league and Australian Rules football.

The Lions responded with a superb try of their own through Welshman George North, converted by Leigh Halfpenny, who also made two further penalties to give the tourists the edge.

Right wing Alex Cuthbert went over for a second Lions try -- again converted by Halfpenny -- early in the second half -- to leave them 20-12 ahead.

James O'Connor and replacement Beale kicked two penalties to give the Wallabies renewed hope, but the ever accurate Halfpenny's boot stretched the lead to 23-18.

But after yet another careless infringement by the Lions left Beale with the opportunity to close the gap to just two points after his own surging run led to a penalty.

1. Who won the game?
2. Who did the beat?
3. Was it close?
4. What was the score?
5. Where was it?
6. Are there any more games?
7. Who had two tries?
8. What sport did he play before?
9. When did he make the change?
10. Who was the away team?
11. Did Beale have a chance to make the score closer?
12. What is Australia's nickname?
13. What's the biggest lead mentioned?
14. Where is George North from?
15. Who converted North's try?
16. What was the score at the midpoint?
17. What building was the game in?
18. What color symbolizes the Lions?
19. How far was Beale's first try from?
20. What's Beale's first name?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. The British and Irish Lions
2. Australia
3. yes
4. 23-21
5. Brisbane
6. yes
7. Israel Folau
8. rugby league and Australian Rules football
9. five months ago
10. The British and Irish Lions
11. yes
12. the Wallabies
13. 20-12
14. Wales
15. Leigh Halfpenny
16. 13-12
17. Suncorp Stadium
18. red
19. 30 meters
20. Kurtley

Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

CHAPTER XXX

GOOD-BY TO THE BOY HUNTERS

"I'll kill that monkey!" roared Ham as he ran into the camp and picked up his ruined clothing. "Look at this!"

"And this!" added Carl Dudder, snatching up the remains of his sleeping blanket.

"It was the chimpanzee, sure enough," said Dick Bush.

"Come on after him!" exclaimed Shep. "Remember the reward," he whispered to his chums.

All presently made off after the chimpanzee. They kept in a bunch at first, but gradually separated, the Spink crowd going one way and Snap and his chums in another.

"I'm glad we caught sight of him as we did," said Whopper. "Now those fellows know we were not guilty of the rough-housing."

"It certainly was rough," was Giant's comment. "Three-quarters of their things are ruined."

"Perhaps they can hold the circus proprietor responsible," said the doctor's son.

They moved forward for nearly a quarter of a mile, and were on the point of giving up the search and returning to camp when Giant caught sight of a small, cave-like opening on the mountain side.

"Let's look in there," he said. "See, there is a vest on the ground in front of it!"

"Be careful---the chimpanzee may be dangerous!" warned Snap.

They hurried forward, with eyes and ears on the alert. Giant looked into the opening.

"No monkey here," he announced. "But he has been here. Look!"

And much to Snap's delight he held up the missing camera. Then he ran into the cave and came forth with Shep's watch, and a number of trinkets taken from the Spink camp.

1. Who held up a missing camera?
2. What animal is in danger of being killed?
3. By who?
4. Was his clothes ruined?
5. Is there a reward involved?
6. Did they get separated?
7. Who said they weren't guilty of playing rough?
8. How much of their things were destroyed?
9. How far did they have to travel?
10. Did they ever find the monkey?
11. What else was located other than the camera?
12. Who's sleeping blanket was messed up?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. Giant
2. the monkey
3. Ham
4. yes
5. yes
6. yes
7. Whopper
8. Three-quarters of their things
9. nearly a quarter of a mile
10. no
11. Shep's watch and a number of trinkets taken from the Spink camp
12. Carl's

Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

In epistemology, rationalism is the view that "regards reason as the chief source and test of knowledge" or "any view appealing to reason as a source of knowledge or justification". More formally, rationalism is defined as a methodology or a theory "in which the criterion of the truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive".

In an old controversy, rationalism was opposed to empiricism, where the rationalists believed that reality has an intrinsically logical structure. Because of this, the rationalists argued that certain truths exist and that the intellect can directly grasp these truths. That is to say, rationalists asserted that certain rational principles exist in logic, mathematics, ethics, and metaphysics that are so fundamentally true that denying them causes one to fall into contradiction. The rationalists had such a high confidence in reason that empirical proof and physical evidence were regarded as unnecessary to ascertain certain truths in other words, "there are significant ways in which our concepts and knowledge are gained independently of sense experience".

Different degrees of emphasis on this method or theory lead to a range of rationalist standpoints, from the moderate position "that reason has precedence over other ways of acquiring knowledge" to the more extreme position that reason is "the unique path to knowledge". Given a pre-modern understanding of reason, rationalism is identical to philosophy, the Socratic life of inquiry, or the zetetic (skeptical) clear interpretation of authority (open to the underlying or essential cause of things as they appear to our sense of certainty). In recent decades, Leo Strauss sought to revive "Classical Political Rationalism" as a discipline that understands the task of reasoning, not as foundational, but as maieutic.

1. What did Leo Strauss want to revive?
2. How is rationalism seen in epistemology?
3. how is it formally defined?
4. Has rationalism ever been controversial?
5. What was it opposed to?
6. Is it illogical or logical?
7. What is the argument for rationalism?
8. Was math apart of the argument?
9. Did ethics come into play?
10. What was the last thing involved?
11. Were they confident in this or not sure?
12. What type of proof did the have?
13. What type of evidence did they not need?
14. What were there words on that?
15. Were there one or many standpoint to this?
16. What was the moderate one?
17. What was more extreme?
18. What is rationalism the same as?
19. What does zetetic mean?
20. Is it considered a discipline?

Numbered answers:

A:
1. Classical Political Rationalism
2. regards reason as the chief source and test of knowledge
3. a methodology or a theory "in which the criterion of the truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive"
4. YES
5. empiricism
6. logical
7. that certain truths exist and that the intellect can directly grasp these truths
8. yes
9. yes
10. metaphysics
11. confident
12. empirical proof
13. physical
14. there are significant ways in which our concepts and knowledge are gained independently of sense experience
15. many
16. that reason has precedence over other ways of acquiring knowledge
17. the unique path to knowledge
18. philosophy
19. skeptical
20. yes