Subject: "holidays".

Body: I think the wedding is on for the 23rd. My mom wants us to stay at a hotel while in DC. I think Bob would likely want us to stay in DC for Christmas Day since Chi will be on honeymoon, but I am not real sure on this. Bob is out in OK over New Year's and I will need to go back up the following weekend to stay with Mom while Bob is out. What do you think. PS My mom is chain smoking - she bought a cartoon of cigarettes with Chi. Chi thinks we should just let her make her own choices. What do you think.

Subject: "Need a Bright Tenured Analyst?".

Body: Ken/Greg: I wish you both the best as you work through the next few weeks. I have a sincere and eager interest in remaining to ensure that Enron remains a viable and competitive force in the energy sector and become the leading transaction provider of gas and power trading and marketing. If you need an analyst to assist you in reaching this goal, please let me know. If you need references, I am confident that John Sherriff or Jeff Kinneman in my current group will provide detailed information on my behalf. Moreover, I am able to provide other contacts within the firm to provide additional information if needed. Best wishes in your future endeavors! Regards

Subject: "Congratulations".

Body: Congratulations to you and Lanettte on the birth of Nicole Mackenzie. What a pretty name! I was in London last week and got the news while I was there. I hope that everyone in your household is doing well, although I know that you are probably a bit sleep deprived. That will pass - although with your first one that is really hard to believe. Please stop by as soon as you have pictures. I would love to see them. --Sally

Subject: "Comments on Dennis' Declaration in UC/CSU Lawsuit".

Body:
Mike: Here are my comments. Apologies for the fact that they are quick and dirty. All Enron's public statements that I have read, including, I think, statements made to financial analysts, state that our exposure in California is not "material." Dennis' declaration says that the situation in California has been a "financial disaster," that "Enron has lost over $300 million," and that "Enron stands to lose millions more." The losses are described as "huge." Perhaps this is information that has since been communicated to the market, but I'm not aware of it. And if it hasn't, it could represent a significant conflict with previous statements. Seems prudent to run this by IR and perhaps others before releasing. Regarding the statements about our hedging strategy. It would seem prudent to run this through the organization for comment and discussion prior to making public. Very minor technical point--I don't think that AB 1890 was passed