Q: If What damaged the Los Angeles Times most after the initial revelations seeped out (from an alternative weekly that didn't exist 20 years ago, it's worth noting) was the beating it took from other big media., can we say that "The Los Angeles Times was damaged by criticism from other big media."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"Towards what end they were working, we did not know. "
Hypothesis: We could not tell what their ultimate motives were.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: American credibility is at stake. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"American credibility could become either better or worse."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Pollock asked for a more specific definition of prioritization.", can we conclude that "The person wanted a more detailed definition."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: uh yeah more of a football powerhouse i guess

Sentence B: He is a powerhouse of football.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Sentence A: evaluation criteria or if other included factors unfairly restrict the competition.

Sentence B: There is no competition to restrict.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no