At the request of Tom Gros, I am attaching our proposed form of Non-Disclosure Agreement. If the enclosed meets with your approval, please execute the agreement and return it to me via fax no. (713) 646-3490. I will then have it executed by Enron. If you have any comments or questions please call Mark Greenberg, Senior Counsel, at (713) 345-8897 or me at (713) 853-3399. We look forward to hearing from you.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: NDA - Zefer Boston
Below is a link to the Proposed Decision by Com. Bilas on the Gas Industry Restructuring proceeding that has been lingering on the agenda for most of the year. This was just issued late last week and published today. I'm still in the process of reviewing it but the good news is that he is proposing the adoption of the Comprehensive Settlement which Transwestern helped design and supported along with most other participants. The decision does however make some modifications which may not be in our best interest i.e. the adoption of a price cap for secondary market transactions. Due to the lapse in time on this proceeding, Com. Bilas has granted participants the right to file comments by Friday, October 19, 2001. Please review and advise if you agree we should file comments (I also have a call into Mark Baldwin). Note this is 140+ pages--you may wish to review the summary and pertinent sections.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: GIR Proceeding--I99-07-003
In the Master Letter Log (version 3/20/02) Belco is included with the early termination made by Westport Resources Corporation. We currently have Belco as a live (non-terminated) CP but this may be incorrect. Please review the Master Letter Log AND the termination provided by Westport Resources to determine whether Belco is included in that early termination. Thanks
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Belco Oil and Gas Corp.
Byron as per the Red Rock expansion conference call today presented below are the emissions estimates for the auxillary engines at sta. 1-4. Understand these are not actual emissions, but are emissions based upon potential to emit. When these units were permitted actual testing data was not required, so each unit was permitted based upon an accpeted emissions limit from an EPA approved document. This has worked out in our favor as the emisisons numbers presented in the EPA document were high, therefore, this will allow us to net more emissions, if needed. Emissions are presented for a single engine only in tons per year, even though there are two auxillary units at each facility except Sta. 1 where they only have one auxillary unit. Sta. 1 1- Waukesha 350 Hp LRZ NOx 30.48 CO 121.94 VOC 1.31 Sta. 2 2- Waukeshas 350 Hp LRZ NOx 30.48 CO 121.94 VOC 1.31 Sta. 3 2-366 Hp PSVG Ingersol Rands NOx 35.35 CO 30.40 VOC .04 Sta. 4 2-450 Hp Waukeshas F3520 GU NOx 43.46 CO 37.38 VOC .05
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
emissions levels for the auxillary units 1-4