In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: "What did all those investigations lead to? WHAT? The Republicans investigated the crap out of all of those conspiracies and what charges did they bring?"

To paraphrase the famous battle cry of John Paul Jones who had asked for a fast ship to go in harms way, "We have not yet BEGUN to investigate Felony-Shrillary".

Don't be surprised if the Mueller investigation you lefties lusted after for so long begins to shine the lamp of truth on what Felony-Shrillary did and why she did it - - how fitting THAT would be, eh wot? Hoist on YOUR petard!

Ex Output:
Obscene

Ex Input:
Comment: "Non-PC speak"; right. Like "campaign device" is really right wing spin speak for "huge lie to convince Trump supporters to vote for him." And "pussy grabbing" is "just locker room talk" heard in no real locker room, ever. How do you define hate speech? I mean, what do the words faggot and nigger and kike and wop, slit, etc mean to you?

Ex Output:
Obscene

Ex Input:
Comment: Amazing how many right wing hawks there are in a newspaper comment forum in a country where Obama would be on the right of Harper. My guess: lots of frustrated, superannuated wasp farts looking to speculation income and their gold plated pensions, which people can no longer even hope to get.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene