The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Example input: Context: 'Great! So looks like all the water goes to you. I will take all the food if that is ok and we can split the wood. ' 'Well i would need one food and one wood' 'OK. I think that will work out for me. You get 3 water, 1 wood and 1 food. I will take the rest.'
Utterance: 'Great that's an agreement for me'
Example output: No
Example explanation: The participant does not engage in any small talk in this utterance and primarily refers to the negotiation itself.
Q: Context: 'Okay, well firewood is also my top priority since it will be so cold tonight. But I would be willing to take only 1 firewood (and give you 2) as long as I got 2 foods and 2 waters ' 'Thank you for the offer on firewood. I think that sounds fair. However, I really would like at least 2 waters as well. ' 'Hmm unfortunately I can't budge since I would be accepting less of my top priority item. It sounds fair to me though; I'd get 5 items in total but less of my top priority and you would get 4 items in total but more of your top priority'
Utterance: 'Well, how about if I take 2 firewoods and all of the food and you can have all of the waters? I have a device that I can make clean water, but will need more calories to do so! 🙂'
A:
No