Problem: Here is a premise:
A notice of proposed rulemaking was published on June 27, 1996, 61 Fed.

Here is a hypothesis:
There was no notice of proposed rulemaking.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: If you want to look like a propaganda organ of Microsoft, about the best thing you could do would be to publish an article about a very hotly contested industry issue, take Microsoft's side, and support your point with misinformation and untruths.

Sentence 2: If you write an article about a controversial issue, you will definitely look like a propaganda for Microsoft.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Having conditioned its audience to view IQ as all-important, The Bell Curve then manipulates statistics in a way that makes IQ look bigger, and everything else smaller, in determining Americans' life-chances.

Does it follow that "The Bell Curve may be responsible for the altered perception, though it may be founded in some truth and fact."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If This would be great for the country but tough on News Quiz, already perilously low on favorite targets., can we say that "This would be bad for the country and great for News Quiz."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"but oh well i don't know"
Hypothesis: I do not know.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: Now the tradition of open-air discussion continues over coffee or a glass of wine on some cafe terrace on the boulevard St-Michel or in the streets around the faculty buildings.

Sentence 2: The traditional outdoor discussions occur near the faculty buildings.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes