In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: He's a proselytizer of newspapers. Choices: 1. The newspaper originally had ideas that countered his own. 2. The newspaper changes its views based on him. 3. He hasn't prolytized a single newspaper in his life.

Ex Output:
2

Ex Input:
Statement: The Decline in U.S. Choices: 1. It has dropped in the United States. 2. The decline was caused by decreasing wages. 3. The increase in the U.S.

Ex Output:
1

Ex Input:
Statement: Others point to Waas' supposedly shoddy reporting of a Pulitzer Prize-nominated article on arms sales to Iraq that he co-wrote for the Los Angeles Times . There is no evidence that the pair repeated any of these alleged sins in their reporting on Hale. Choices: 1. These sins were not recorded to have been repeated. 2. The evidence towards these sins is incontrovertible. 3. They committed the sins and put in a massive amount of effort in hiding the evidence.

Ex Output:
1