TASK DEFINITION: Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.
PROBLEM: CONTEXT: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts' wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation. Only at the most distant point of the mission the conversation gaps reach 21 minutes. Thus, there seems to be no blooper nor plothole. (I am much more worried about the Apollo mission technology used for a journey of at least a year. Could three astronauts just sit in the command module most of the time? I guess even the strongest personalities would have gone mad. There might have been a strong extended/additional stage of a modified Saturn rocket for the outward and return journey. If this stage was equipped with extra rooms, stores etc. it would appear more realistic than what we see in the movie.) <sep> Q: How is the fluent conversation with spacecraft possible in Capricorn One? A: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts' wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How close was Capricorn One to earth?

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: CONTEXT: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so. He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot. It's a judgment call by the Academy, but his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct. <sep> Q: Why was Dev Patel nominated for Supporting Actor rather than Best Actor? A: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So he wasn't eligible?

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: CONTEXT: A properly executed plot twist often causes opposite reactions of what you've just described. People want to watch the movie again because the ending was so unexpected that they need to review the whole thing to get all the puzzle pieces together. "Fight Club" is a great example, in my opinion. There's a lot of dialogue (especially the lines from Helena Bonham Carter) that doesn't make any sense if you don't know the ending. You will enjoy and understand Fight Club much better after a second view. There are many ingredients that define the quality and longevity of a movie. Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience. <sep> Q: Is there any evidence of "Big Twist" movies having poor post-cinema sales? A: Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience Q: Do you think this is a common reaction though? A: A properly executed plot twist often causes opposite reactions of what you've just described Q: So, for up ad coming directors, is this the type of movie to stay away from A: Directors should not be afraid to use a plot twist, but relying only on this trick - especially if it is predictable - may ruin the whole experience <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there evidence to suggest that this type of film have relatively poor post-cinema sales?

SOLUTION:
Yes