Premise:
"We have exposed the counterrevolutionary machinations of Richard Ford and Amy Tan."
Hypothesis: We exposed the machinations of the authors.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: That was Pa right enough. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The image in the painting was Pa exactly."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "At one point, West quotes Du Bois--with no sense of irony--to the effect that we must have honest men or we die.", can we conclude that "Du Bois expressed that we must have honest men or death."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Comptroller General Aof the United States

Sentence B: The general comptroller

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: yeah oh they're good they're great and it's uh like uh uh usually about a family of um
This is good, but not as good as last time.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
In hindsight, should you have stopped all private law practice?

Here is a hypothesis:
Private law practices are instruments of greed.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell