QUESTION: Bill, attached is a memo prepared by Susan Scott that does a good job of answering the several questions that you had about the situation at Topock. Note that in Susan's first answer, PG&E has no obligation to Transwestern to accept gas at Topock. They may well have obligations to their own transportation customers or sales customers that have to be satisfied with Topock receipts, but that doesn't give TW any rights against PG&E. I realize these are not comforting answers, but I wanted us all to have a realistic understanding of where we are. I'm running this by Lou in case he has a different spin on the history or the agreements. Thanks. DF
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: PG&E: PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL--ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT

QUESTION: Scott, Finally, here's the resolution on the Coenergy invoice for April, 1999. Coenergy is telling me that the we need to pay the difference $2.90 vs. $2.74 on 10,000 MMBtu per day. If this is true, please pay the difference of $0.155 to Coenergy on a volume of 10,000 MMBtu per day for April, 1999. If your understanding is different, please let me know, but otherwise please pay the difference. Thank you for your patience, and sorry it took so long to resolve.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Coenergy

QUESTION: You had asked for more information regarding Canadian renewal rights. I found language in tariff in Transcanada's website (www.transcanada..com) under the following: NOVA FTS-R, Sec 12, FTS-D, Sec 10 BC system, Sec 4.9 Bottom line: 12 month notice prior to end of term. Once notice given, irrevocable! Must extend for at least one year. Please call if you have questions. Please call if you have any question. Steph
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Canadian Tariffs