Problem: Here is a premise:
and so what we go through is uh if you see it smoking there's a problem and having worked with some of the legal folks very closely uh it becomes a real issue especially when it's smoking and you have to get it fixed el pronto

Here is a hypothesis:
If it is smoking there is a fire.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Therefore, the recipient entity recognizes the transfer-in as an other financing source, and the transferring entity recognizes the transfer-out as a negative financing source.

Sentence 2: This system has simplified the job of accounting in more ways than one.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Rather than sponsor truncated representation, ante, at 11, Congress chose to subsidize only those cases in which the attorneys it subsidized could work freely.

Does it follow that "They chose to sponsor truncated representation."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If The reconstructed Kumamoto Castle is worth a visit for the significant role it played during the last hectic days of Japan's feudal era., can we say that "Kumamoto Castle was barely involved with the end of Japan's feudal era."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"The contract should specify conditions for acceptable performance."
Hypothesis: The contract will specify the amount of money we want to spend.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: It has been architected, that is, to be different from the principle of non-discrimination in the original Net.

Sentence 2: They made this version better then the original principle of non-discrimination.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell