Question:
The media exaggerate the risks and benefits of research findings, and it's only in rare cases (notably cigarette smoking) that science discovers clear evidence that changing behavior can improve health.

Does it follow that "Risks and benefits of research findings are never exaggerated by the media."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If It is astonishing to see a public figure at a political event refer to any work of literature written before 1985 or, in the case of George W., written., can we say that "Politicians think no one reads the classics anymore."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"'Shut up.'"
Hypothesis: They entered the room and we all had to shut up as soon as possible, or else they would hear us and give away our location.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: absolutely absolutely i don't it's gonna be hard to um we've that's you that's you that's that's where you're absolutely right as we've got to do something in that region to encourage uh or to make to make him growing bananas profitable again i mean If this premise is true, does that tell us:"we have to do something in his area to incentivize him to grow bananas again"?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "GAO follows modified protocols in work leading up to congressional testimony and during investigations of fraud, abuse, or misconduct conducted by its Office of Special Investigations.", can we conclude that "The Office of Special Investigations is forbidden from dealing with cases on fraud or abuse."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

input question: they are they are doing a whole bunch better who's their quarterback If this premise is true, does that tell us:"They are awful all the time."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer:
no