In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[EX Q]: Statement: Moreover, requiring legal services attorneys to monitor their clients' movements and formally withdraw whenever the client left the country would creating extraordinary burdens for the LSC grantees, the clients, opposing parties, and the courts. Choices: 1. There would be huge burdens upon LSC grantees if attorneys had to monitor their clients. 2. There is no burnen in attorneys monitoring their clients. 3. The LSC lawyers are extremely overworked.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: A substantial body of published scientific literature recognizes a correlation between elevated PM concentrations and increased mortality rates. Choices: 1. There is a correlation between elevated PM concentrations and increased mortality rates. 2. There is no evidence that there is a correlation between elevated PM concentrations and increased mortality rates. 3. However the study needs more trials.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: Scandal questions upstaged Gore's feel-good visit to New Hampshire, giving pundits hope that he may get a real fight in the 2000 primaries. Choices: 1. Gore's visit was upstaged by scandalous questions. 2. Gore might not win the 2000 primaries. 3. Gore is for sure going to be the next President of The United States of America.
[EX A]:
2