Question: Sentence A: San'doro stood, his face hidden under his black hood.

Sentence B: San'doro was hiding the bruises on his face.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Opponents said reformers shouldn't jump the gun, since 1) the decision did not deal with soft money; and 2) the court refused to overturn its 1976 decision that campaign spending limits do impede free speech.
Opponents and reformers should not act with too much haste without considering hard money.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
The rancher says it's his land, not the government-protected wolf's.

Here is a hypothesis:
Wolves are vegetarians, so I don't know why this Rancher is upset.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: oh yeah that looks really good too

Sentence 2: I can look at that too.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
yeah and they like to fish they've been inviting us to come up there in the summer her dad has a cabin and they go fishing up there

Does it follow that "They've never invited us to their cabin."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "Thus, by using this evaluation technique, we are able to avoid the need for obtaining productive hourly costs translated into dollars using purchasing power parities.", can we conclude that "The money saved by using these techniques can be spent on more important things. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell