Per our discussion when I was in London, we ordered you a box of blue files and sent them to you (for your original deal files since you said you couldn't get those types of files in England). One of our assistants got a call from what I guess must be Meagan and she (Meagan) said she was sending the files back because it wasn't what she wanted. So if you do want the blue files you might want to intervene with Meagan before the files cross the Atlantic again. We would, of course, be able to use the files here, so no big deal.
Answer: Blue Files
This is the section they wish to change.=20 =01&11.1. Except with regard to a party's obligation to make payment due un= der=20 Section 7. and Imbalance Charges under Section 4, neither party shall be=20 liable to the other for failure to perform a Firm obligation, to the extent= =20 such failure was caused by Force Majeure. The term "Force Majeure" as=20 employed herein means an event not anticipated as of the date hereof, which= =20 is not within the reasonable control of the Party (or in the case of third= =20 party obligations or facilities, the third party) claiming suspension, and= =20 which such Party (or third party) by the exercise of due diligence is unabl= e=20 to overcome, or which such Party (or third party) by the exercise of due=20 diligence is unable to obtain or cause to be obtained a commercially=20 reasonable substitute performance. Subject to the foregoing sentence, even= ts=20 of Force Majeure shall include the events as further defined in Section 11.= 2=20 and shall include an event of Force Majeure occurring with respect to the= =20 facilities or services of Buyer's or Seller's Transporter.=018 =20
Answer: Ogle
The September 26, 2001 order had established December 10, 2001 as the date for "Simultaneous rebuttal testimony on November 6, 2001 evidentiary presentations." On November 6, 2001 several parties had filed responsive testimony on issues relating to other sources of cost recovery, including NOx emissions and startup costs The November 23, 2001 order said these issues will be addressed at the February hearing on issues 2 and 3. This combination left Staff uncertain as to when rebuttal testimony on these issues is to be filed. We called Bryan Clark, Judge Birchman's new law clerk, and asked when we are to file rebuttal testimony. He checked with Judge Birchman, and said we are to file all rebuttal testimony on these issues on February 6, 2002.
Answer: rebuttal testimony schedule clarification
Mark Although the Xcelerator has been moved to Corp, Jim Derrick asked that I continue to receive legal support from your group. I and people in my group have worked some with Teresa Bushman and Angela Davis in Lance Schuler's group. Would you like me to consider Lance or someone in his group as my legal "point person", or is there someone else you'd prefer? Thanks
Answer:
Quick question - Xcelerator legal "point person"