In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Actually, those who fought in the military fought to protect the rights of people like those NFL players, and their supporting owners, who made a peaceful demonstration. That is what you fought for: to protect all speech, not just the speech you agree with. You did not fight for the flag or national anthem. You fought for the Constitution. This is what our freedom is about. It's not about marching in lock step with what a fake patriot like DT commands. Our military fought so we can protest dictators like DT.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: That is 100 % an impossibility. If you are pro life and vote and support candidates and a party that advocates full term and late term abortion at will then you cannot under any circumstance be pro life.

You have to look at where the candidates stand. Hillary wants us to be required to provide and pay for abortions and abortive medicines. She stated flat out in the debate she supports full term partial birth murder. HOW can ANY Catholic support her. Then there are the e - mails where she, through her campaign, states how "backwards" we are and advocates groups to sping to action when they can incite a "Catholic Spring." SHE will use law and the courts to mandate the marrying of homosexuals and the providing of abortion procedures. No Catholic can vote for her.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Ridiculous, indeed. Although Rome does seem to have a soft spot for cocaine-fueled homosexual orgies under the very nose of the pope.
Output: Sexual-explicit