Problem: This review is like what?
OPTIONS:
- negative
- positive

Review:A very strong movie. Bruce is good and Brad also.

As I think there are two cities missed in the receptionist list from the list Bruce remembered.

That means the woman was a real insurance and she did her job.

Well, Novikov property seems to me work in this movie. However, I do believe in Back to the future theory of worlds' multiplicity.

So Bruce could save the world, but not his world.

In the theory of parallel worlds the man can meet himself.

And I do believe there is no problem in that. Here I disagree with Dr. Brown from Back...

But the story pf 12 Monkeys has its own beauty. Inspite of all these theories of one world or many or continuum one can believe that he is really insane and the doctor - his girlfriend was just lost.

A sequence of events which may lead her to believe that he is from the future. The bullet - well it might be some mistake, some falsification.

Well I like this movie - has to buy a DVD.

Best.
+++++++++
A: positive

Problem: This review is like what?
OPTIONS:
- negative
- positive

Review:This movie is nothing short of a dark, gritty masterpiece. I may be bias, as the Apartheid era is an area I've always felt for. But I'd say it ranks right up with Cry Freedom and Cry the Beloved Country. Sadly up until a few days ago I'd never even heard of this movie. Inside is one of the most underrated films of all time, probably because it was a small film company, I'd never even heard of it before. Eric Stoltz, one of my favorite actors anyway, is believable and dramatic, Nigel Hawthorne plays his dastardly role well. Do not look for humor in this film, there is none. It is real, savage and gritty to the last, and to the sensitive I'd say bring a box of tissues. But movies as great as this make you wonder, why is it that the greatest films are often never heard of?
+++++++++
A: positive

Problem: This review is like what?
OPTIONS:
- negative
- positive

Review:The reason I intended to give this movie a chance to take 2 hours of my life (actually it was only 35 minutes) was my wish to try to understand and hopefully appreciate Indian cinema. All I have ever seen were few older movies of S.Ray.

Browsing through IMDb I came across this one and after seeing rating of 8.7 I concluded this must be the one which will open the doors of unknown and bring artistic enjoyment. Oh my how wrong I was! The only logical explanation for this rating of 8.7 is that most of 970 people who voted are Indian and their only venture outside Bolliwood production were Adam Sandler movies.

With this rating this movie would be ranked on 9th place on IMDb List of 250 best movies above Citizen Cane, Goodfellas of Psycho! I am really not in a mood to review and criticize because there is simply nothing that I find worth remembering from this painful experience. My only hope is that there is a lot of Hindu who like me find this movie as is -- plain stupid, with abundance of kitsch and cheesy music.
+++++++++
A: negative

Problem: This review is like what?
OPTIONS:
- negative
- positive

Review:At first you think another Disney movie, it might be good, but it's a kids movie. But when you watch it, you can't help but enjoy it. All ages will love this movie. I first saw this movie when I was 10 and now 8 years later I still love it! Danny Glover is superb and could not play the part any better. Christopher Lloyd is hilarious and is perfect for the part. Tony Danza is so believable as Mel Clark. You can't help, but to enjoy this movie! I give it a 10/10!
+++++++++
A:
positive