Given reviews from Amazon, classify those review based on their content into two classes: Negative or Positive.
One example is below.
Q: I've read this book with much expectation, it was very boring all through out the book
A: Negative
Rationale: Review writer does not like the book because it was boring, therefore it is a negative review.
Q: ...is the full and misleading name of this album, one that is as run of the mill as a fan of electronic metamusic could desire. This album has seven tracks, ranging in time from 3-11 minutes, but don't let that fool you into thinking there's much variety. All of them meld together after the first, "Fish", which is the highlight among few others that are moderately well-crafted and distinct. There is a definite feeling of sonic recycling ("didn't I just hear that whir on the previous track?") and a limited sound spectrum within their grasp. One can't expect too terribly much from indie techno, so its unfair to condemn this album for lack of equipment. It's usually competent, even musical, but when an occasional vocal bit is all that differentiates one track from another, one tends to seek greener electropastures.
A:
Negative