Question: Sentence A: ( In authentic religion, doesn't it take Kierkegaard's leap of faith?

Sentence B: In authentic religion, doesn't it take Schrodinger's cat?

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: It will also improve visibility over much of the country, particularly the scenic vistas in national parks such the Grand Canyon.
The Grand Canyon will see an improvement in visibility thanks to it.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
plus a lot more you know and you got to realize that there's only this much money in the bank and if you're going to live you know

Here is a hypothesis:
There is not an unlimited supply of money in the bank.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: and everything huh

Sentence 2: All of the stuff that you talked about.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
If only Poirot had been accessible, I could have asked his advice.

Does it follow that "I was a little miffed that he hadn't told me his plans. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Most commercial ferries arrive at the new port of Athinios farther along the coast.", can we conclude that "The Athinios port was designed specifically for commercial ferries."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell