In reviewing Jeff Shields' expenses for the previous two months, I have found two travel itineraries which came without prices on them. Jessica and Mollie have both checked their e-mail and confirmed that the only documents sent did not detail the cost of the trip. The prices I need are from the following trips: Itinerary only - August 28, Alaska Airlines, PDX-SeaTac-Helena-SeaTac-PDX, Reservation # AS/WXOKNK (reservation made August 24) Itinerary only - Sept. 6 to 7, Delta Airlines, PDX-Salt Lake City-Spokane-PDX, Reservation # DL/V2KIC3 (reservation made September 6) Thank you so much for your time.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Travel Invoices
Rick - As we discussed, I have an outstanding tax liability with the Australian government, and I need your help in this matter. Working for Enron Ex-Pat Services, I incurred additional tax liabilities which Enron was to pay on my behalf. In simple terms, Enron agreed to make up the difference between my U.S. income tax liability and that charged by Australia. My full U.S. tax liability was withheld from my paychecks and Enron was to make up the difference between this and the 48% charged by the Australian government. As of today, the incremental tax liability has not been addressed by Enron, and I need to resolve this issue immediately. It appears that the easiest solution is for Enron Corp. to wire Enron Australia the estimated tax liability, with Enron Australia passing the money to the Australian tax authority. I will have the final estimate from PWC first thing Monday morning, but it has been indicated that the liability in total will be less than $50,000 U.S.. I appreciate any help you can provide in getting this matter resolved. I will provide you the specific estimates Monday morning, and in the interim, if there is anything else you need from me, I am at your disposal. Thanks -
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Australian Tax Liability
Mary: Enclosed is a draft of the CA agreement. I spoke with DSavid this morning about the point that you had raised as item #3 in your last e-mail and given what Enron has done and might in the future do in this area, from a legal standpoint, I cannot get comfortable placing any further limitations on Enron in this agreement other than the disclosure and use limitations that are currently in the CA which we feel should protect RMS. Ones interpretation of what is meant by "creating derivative works of" the data is to ambiguous for me to feel comfortable putting ahytning further in this CA. I look forward to hearing from you. Carol
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Draft OF CA
I spoke with Earl regarding the cost differences indicated for the Calpine -Topock interconnect. The project files were discarded when the E&C Group moved to 3 Allen Center due to lack of storage capacity. But Earl recalled that Jim Tucker said that the scope change was done at the request of Marketing which explains the two work order forms that you have. E&C does not initiate project scope changes unless directed.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Calpine Cost Estimates