Sentence 1: He planned the town on the principle of the human body, with the government buildings of the Capitol and university at its head, the commercial town-center at its heart, and the outlying industrial districts as its limbs.

Sentence 2: The structure of the human body was the primary inspiration for the layout of the town.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Please keep trying, either in The Fray or by e-mail to letters@msn.com.

Does it follow that "Please keep trying to get ahold of the editor about the mistake and if you need to email him, do so. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If It was already there "in the mixture. , can we say that "It was not already a part of the mixture"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"How about Lexington and Concord or no taxation without representation?"
Hypothesis: Lexington and Concord are immediately associated with no taxation without representation.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: it just doesn't make sense to buy a used car down here If this premise is true, does that tell us:"It probably isn't a great idea to buy a preowned car around here."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Q: If Stewardship PP and E would include stewardship land (that is, land not acquired for or in connection with general property, plant, and equipment); heritage assets (for example, Federal monuments and memorials and historically or culturally significant property); and Federal mission property, plant, and equipment (for example, space exploration and military weapons systems)., can we say that "Stewardship land is land that is acquired for federal monuments."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
no