Q: Marie is not in the office today; your direct contact should be Susan Bailey (X 34737). I spoke earlier with Rick Hopkinson who indicated that the account will probably be for the benefit of EPCA. We need to verify a few details (account party, purpose, resolutions, authorized trader list, etc.). Also, will the broker be Morgan? Nancy, since you will be working on the authorizations, please keep in mind that Ted Murphy will limit authorized traders to the Houston equity traders(and perhaps Bruce) for control purposes. I believe we had to change the Enron Brazil Power Holding XII Ltd. resolutions in that regard. I'll verify. Susan and I will wait to hear from one of you in Sao Paulo. I called about 10 minutes ago and no one was available. Thanks. Sara
Propose a subject line
A: Brokerage Account/CIESA transaction
IN: Attached are the marks for New Power for COB 10/02/01. The exposure as increased by $24.5MM due to a large number of capacity deals that have rolled-off bringing our total Net Exposure after collateral to $36.6MM. Please let me know if you would like any additional information. Thank you

Generate a subject line.

OUT: New Power
IN: This is an email
My CES buddy is starting to focus on local production now. What's bad is CES has seen some of the pricing for the local production, I was going to bill them a lot more for it. That does not mean they agree to the pricing.

What is the subject?

OUT: local production
QUESTION: The following reports have been waiting for your approval for more than 4 days. Please review. Owner: Luiz T Maurer Report Name: LM 111301 Days In Mgr. Queue: 14 Owner: Susan J Mara Report Name: SJM11152001 Days In Mgr. Queue: 11
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Expense Reports Awaiting Your Approval
There seems to be some question whether Utilicorp. can trade financial. I opened them to trade all financial (including power) on 7/26/00. I think the customer is calling Kathy for access. There should be no change in their physical power profile.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Utilicorp United Inc.
I am forwarding this message which I received yesterday for your review and action. Imagine the chilling effect that a tax would have on the exchange of nostalgia that has been taking place between the brethren. Even if you don't participate directly it has been a pleasure to watch. My name is Starkey Sharp. I graduated in 1974. I don't remember my number, but I think it was around 504. Federal Bill 602p Guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill 602P 5-cents per E-mail sent. It figures! No more free E-mail! We knew this was coming!! Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent charge on every delivered E-mail. Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay online and continue using E-mail. The last few months have revealed an alarming trend in the Government of the United States attempting to quietly push through legislation that will affect our use of the Internet. Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be attempting to bill E-mail users out of "alternative postage fees." Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent surcharge on every e-mail delivered, by billing Internet Service Providers at source. The consumer would then be billed in turn by the ISP. Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent this legislation from becoming law. The US Postal Service is claiming lost revenue, due to the proliferation of E-mail, is costing nearly $230,000,000 in revenue per year. You may have noticed their recent ad campaign: "There is nothing like a letter." Since the average person received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day in 1998, the cost of the typical individual would be an additional 50 cents a day --
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
[smu-betas] FW: Federal Bill 602p