Premise:
"yeah i had a whole bunch of flowers and things well i don't have as many now we lived in the country for a long time and i had a whole bunch but"
Hypothesis: I grew roses and sunflowers.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: Some time, some place, in the distant future- when things were right and normal again- I could come back. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"I would never return."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "i would think i don't know might be a little bit different because the city interferes with the weather patterns to a certain extent because of the heating of the of the concrete and asphalt", can we conclude that "The city does not tamper with weather patterns."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: But what earthly interest could he have in my mother's death?

Sentence B: He is investigating the potential for a serial killer.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: The conclusion, then, is influenced strongly by whether the workshare category is more elastic.
The conclusion is influenced by the elasticity of the workshare category.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
With this greater capital intensity, diminishing returns to capital have reduced the return on investment in Japan over the years.

Here is a hypothesis:
Diminishing returns to capital has been a factor of reduced investment in Asia.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell