In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: "... scientism, the notion that the only valid means of understanding ... is via science and the scientific method."
.
Thus David Mulroney conjures a straw man that he then proceeds to ridicule.
There are serious issues to face. Two of them are
.
(a) the threat to democracy of the targeted spread of misinformation and polarisation through social media; and
(b) the undermining of evidence-based decision-making, whether on climate change, public transportation, taxation, criminal law, immigration, abortion ...
.
It is long past time that government - including the Crown - stopped pandering to the falsehoods of political and religious demagoguery.
.
The US disaster was brought about by the hypocrisy of right-wing religious voters. Their religious quackery is now a clear menace to the world.
David Mulroney expects the Crown to pander to quackery?
.
We would not tolerate holocaust denial from the Crown.
David Mulroney expects the Crown to pander to climate change denial?
Non-obscene