QUESTION: Premise: "Two children smile next to a fruit vendor's cart."
Hypothesis: "There are children near the vendors cart."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: The words next to are a different version of the word near.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "One boy in a purple sweater is hugging another boy in a purple sweater."
Hypothesis: "Two boys are hugging because they're wearing matching sweaters."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Just because one boy in a purple sweater is hugging another boy in a purple sweater does not mean they are hugging because they are wearing matching sweaters.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "A dog drinks from a sprinkler." can we conclude that "A dog is inside on the couch."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The dog is inside on couch which is contradictory to the dog drinking from a sprinkler.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A drawing artist sitting down to eat at a cafe after a long day of hard work." can we conclude that "The artist has food."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: The artist has food due to a hard day of work.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A yellow dog is standing in front of a green car and next to a toilet."
Hypothesis: "A yellow female dog is standing in front of a car."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A yellow dog is standing in front of a green car and next to a toilet does not imply that female dog is standing in front of a car.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A man wades in the water and watches a waterfall."
Hypothesis: "A man watches a waterfall from the water."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A:
The man watches the waterfall from the water because he is wading in the water.
The answer is yes.