Question:
Based on the premise "Whether a particular act is, in fact, illegal may have to await final determination by a court of law or other adjudicative body.", can we conclude that "Whether a particular act is illegal depends purely on the opinion of the doer and not on any other governing court. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: and he said a what and i said a tire tool he said you mean a T A R tool and i said no a T I R E tool

Sentence B: We had a misunderstanding concerning what I had said.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: President Bush purposely mispronounced Saddam Hussein to annoy the Iraqi leader, while Iraqi newsreaders retaliated by mispronouncing Bush so that, in Arabic, it meant nothing.
President Bush did not intentionally mispronounce Saddam Hussein's name.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
I'd like to run.

Here is a hypothesis:
I do not like to run.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: This non-LSC funded entity is available to clients throughout the state and currently consists of six full and part-time staff attorneys.

Sentence 2: This entity not funded by LSC is available to clients throughout the state and currently consists of six full and part-time staff attorneys.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"uh-huh oh so you're you're an old pro then"
Hypothesis: So you've been a pro at this for 20 years now?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell