Sentence 1: a little baby chicken and all that but they say you shouldn't do that any more but um

Sentence 2: It is illegal for you to do it anymore.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Consider Only 13 nations participated in 1896, but there were 172 in 1992.

Does it follow that "13 nations were involved in the world stage in 1896, while 172 were in 1992."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If In the courtyard is a huge iron cauldron that was used for distributing rice gruel to the poor during famines in the 17th and 19th centuries., can we say that "Rice gruel was the only thing served in the courtyard."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"So we all have benefited indirectly."
Hypothesis: Everyone has benefited from the increase budget for healthcare.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: Post-show, Seinfeld plans to take time off, swim with dolphins, and then start an ad boutique (he wrote his own American Express ads). If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Post-show, Seinfeld plans to swim with dolphins and start an ad boutique."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Q: If This could lead to a spiral of rate increases and further volume losses., can we say that "There is no chance of a spiral of rate increase."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
no