Problem: Whereas if you don't accept the Copyright Clause claim, then, in order to make the First Amendment analysis we've simply got to say, well, gee, is the promotion of useful art and so on more important than the public domain, and can we say that that allows a distinction between 50 years and 70 years?

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The speaker here is a lawyer."?

A: It's impossible to say

Problem: When I see, for example, what they did with Dorval airport, where an agreement had almost been concluded with the Sret du Qubec to assume responsibility for airport security and the federal government stepped in and imposed the RCMP, you will understand that, because of the powers that will be given to our customs officers with Bill C-18, members of the Bloc Quebecois want to make sure that provincial jurisdictions are respected.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "There is an airport in Dorval."?

A: Yes

Problem: Movie Detour<br>Will and his friends went to the movie theater. They were pumped about a new movie's opening night. When they arrived, their movie had been sold out. They decided to see a comedy instead. They couldn't believe how much fun they had at the comedy!

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Will and his gang had to change their plans."?

A:
Yes