Detailed Instructions: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. The four incorrect answers are other holding statements. You should find the correct option. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Q: of the complaint because it is unclear whether he was acting within the course and scope of his employment. There is a factual dispute whether the chase began on or off of reservation property, as well as a legal question concerning Epstein's authority to engage in a chase in order to investigate an expired license tag. See e.g. City of Pinellas Park v. Brown, 604 So.2d 1222, 1226 (Fla.1992)(<HOLDING>). AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND
Holding statements: (A) holding that tribal sovereign immunity did not bar rico suit only after concluding that sue and be sued clause in tribal ordinance unequivocally expressed waiver of sovereign immunity (B) holding that sovereign immunity barred a wrongful death claim against the board and stating that the only question is whether the boards sovereign immunity protection was waived emphasis added (C) holding that a state may waive its sovereign immunity (D) holding that rfras waiver of sovereign immunity did not extend to monetary damages the acts reference to appropriate relief was susceptible to more than one interpretation and thus was not an unambiguous waiver of sovereign immunity (E) holding that sovereign immunity shields only those acts which are discretionary in nature and not operational
A:
(E)