input question: The Model cannot address the uncertainty of deregulation created by California's experience -- where competition may increase or decrease in the future. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The model is not advanced enough to analyze the experience."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "'Jacob, I'll need to see you in the cockpit.'", can we conclude that "Jacob, come to the cockpit."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: In the end, I agree that principles of evolutionary psychology tend to support the argument for sleeping with your infant.

Sentence B: Principles of evolutinary psychology encourage infants to sleep alone.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: yeah oh and still are
Still are.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
uh but yeah i hope some of the local well that's what they they keep saying that it seems like people with it with old-fashioned values are the ones that aren't turning out at the at the booths they they say that these older voters that uh you know they they feel like the kids are running the the country so they they don't come out turn out to vote and they're the ones that uh you know really know what's going on have the experience and have seen you know how politicians can you know screw up or whatever

Here is a hypothesis:
They think that older voters do not have positive feelings toward voting.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question:
(Of course, to a weasel, the meaning is quite clear.)

Does it follow that "To a weasel the meaning is unclear."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no