You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: It's bad enough we already have all these American sicko's living in this country shooting up theatre, schools, churches, malls, etc., we don't have room for crazy muslims.
Solution: Identity-attack
Why? This comment contains identity attacks on both American and Muslim.

New input: Comment: Weather this child had pubic hair or not, it was purely and simply (attempted) rape. Drunk or not --RAPE! When an adult attempts to have sex with a minor it is RAPE no matter what age the minor is. The age of consent has been raised most appropriately to keep more experienced men and women from taking advantage of our children. Age of the child is not the important part, it is only an attempt by church officials to nit pick. Rape is Rape, no matter what the age. It is statutory rape for an adult to have even consented sex with a minor. There is a bit of a problem when one person is 17 and the other is 18 and that is why sometimes the whole situation must be taken into consideration. The most important thing though for Catholic Clergy and laity alike to accept is that Rape is Rape and it is illegal and immoral and unethical to quibble about by Clerical authorities. Report all Rape to the police and never the Bishop...
Solution:
Non-identity-attack