Teacher:In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: Comment: "Wait - what "due process" did he have? There is no mention in the article about his being charged with a crime. If he is believed to have committed a crime, he should be charged and tried, not simply tossed out of school based on the opinions of a biased kangaroo court."

This hits the nail on the head. Upon cross-examination, the person in charge of my tribunal admitted that 100% of students that go through the student conduct system are "found responsible" for the charges. Innocence isn't considered a valid defense. There's no due process, they will deny your right to an attorney, they will even withhold exculpatory evidence from you. I am speaking from experience. If you are accused, then you are found guilty, *100%* of the time. Call them kangaroo courts, these are "Star Chambers" where there's already a predetermined outcome.
Student:
Non-insult