Q: Louise and Geoff, Please review the attached Statement Of Work of the new gas system project and provide me with your comments by next Friday, 10/12/01. I would like to request your signature after your review of the document. By the way, Beth Perlman, Steve Stock and Richard Burchfield have read the Statement Of Work. Thanks
Propose a subject line
A: Statement Of Work of the new gas system project
IN: Holli: EWEB's Board Resolution of December 5, 2000 permits financial hedging in general and authorizes: "The General Manager or other authorized officers as noted in the Power Risk Management Guidelines to execute confirmations of transactions within the limits specified in the Power Risk Management Guidelines." Each time ENA trades with EWEB, the trader must verify whether the EWEB trader is authorized under the then current version of the Power Risk Management Guidelines. Each date you execute a trade: (1) you will need a list of authorized traders (authorized to enter into derivative transactions) certified by EWEB's secretary to be correct as of the Trade Date and (2) a statement certified by EWEB's secretary that the Transaction falls within the limits specified in the most current version of the Power Risk Management Guidelines, effective as of the Trade Date. We have only a portion of the Power Risk Management Guidelines and it is dated April 19, 1999. Our version is incomplete and probably outdated. Maybe EWEB will provide you with the current version. It would be a lot easier if EWEB's resolution simply authorized it to enter into financial trades documented under the ISDA (which is what most resolutions permit). However, EWEB did not obtain a broad resolution. To Melissa, Sharen and Kim: We should also verify that our confirmations contain these representations. Please talk to me.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: EWEB
IN: This is an email
Please let me know if you have any comments or if I can provide additional info. re the attached. The DASH will circulate this afternoon or Monday. Esmeralda -- Please printo out and fax to my attention at the Woodlands the attachment.

What is the subject?

OUT: Legal Risk Memo re Siemens Repair and Parts Agreements
QUESTION: Carolyn, I wasn't sure you had the last version. This is the version agreed to by GE, which should be attached to the letter agreement. I will email an exhibit which needs to be inserted.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: CA Development Agreements
Ken talked to Sen Kinder. He made the points you had prepared. Kinder agreed to shelve the legislation for this session. He said he had been hearing from several others, including Proctor and Gamble (which has a big facility in his district) that the legislation was not going to help competition develop in the state. He expressed willingness to work with us on a better package and also expressed interest in coming to Enron's offices. He is going to be in San Antonio in August and would like to come to Houston around that time.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: call to Sen Kinder
Michelle/Kimberly, I was looking at the economics for Park-N-Rides (on the TW Mainline Leg) thought you might be interested in this: According to Gary Choquette, it costs us in fuel 1420 Mscf/d for storage of 42,502 Mscf of gas. Assuming a BTU factor of 1.00 and at a gas cost of $3.00 per MMBTU--fuel costs amount to $4260/day. Adding O&M to this (assuming 1/3 fuel cost), the total cost of this storage to us is ~13 cents.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Park-N-Ride Economics