Question: Sentence A: There's a special Kid's World that those under 12 can enter free when accompanied by a paying adult.

Sentence B: When accompanied by a paying adult, children under 12 can enter for free.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: In a morning's tour from Morlaix, about 160 km (100 miles) to the west of Dinard, you can take in three of the most important ones on a route signposted as the Circuit des Enclos Paroissiaux.
Dinard is about 100 miles to the east of Morlaix.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
see see one of the things that will determine whether they're able to do that or not is not their ability to prove that it is unhealthy because we all know that French fries are not healthy for you it's the capability it's the capability of detecting it

Here is a hypothesis:
We all know that French fries are very healthy.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: The gardens, once a favorite spot for aristocratic duels, now serve as a pleasant children's playground.

Sentence 2: The gardens are a favorite spot for children.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
yeah and not to have to pull up roots and you know and go somewhere half way around the world or something

Does it follow that "I would love to be somewhere half way around the world pulling up roots."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "and then if you have particular religious beliefs they have to be they're kind of monitored", can we conclude that "They do not trust other religions being practiced."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell