input question: If anyone actually was inclined to light up a cigar after breakfast, he would have been breaking the NAM's no-smoking rule, according to an association representative (who, like another witness I talked to, saw no cigars). If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There were no cigars."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "The independence and objectivity of stock analysts reporting is also a matter of concern.", can we conclude that "It is a concern because if it isn't truly objective, it could lead to false results."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Wait." The girl put her finger to her lips.

Sentence B: She desired for there to be silence and patience in wait.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: I needn't tell the next part, because you know it.
I will have to repeat the ending of the story for you, since you have forgotten.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
um-hum well i've considered it last year and this year both but i haven't done anything about it so

Here is a hypothesis:
Maybe I'll think more about it for next year.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Sure thing, mimicked Tuppence.

Does it follow that "Certainly not, declined Tuppence."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no