Roger Federer will not necessarily beat an opponent just because he strikes a tennis ball with a forehand swing.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Roger federer strikes a tennis ball with a forehand swing on a tennis court."
Hypothesis: "Federer will beat his opponent."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell

The men may not be in a garden just because they are surrounded by plant life.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two men sit on a bench surrounded by plant life."
Hypothesis: "The men are in a garden."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell

A dog cannot both eat cheese and be herding at the same time.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "Border collies at herding a competition." is it true that "Dogs eat cheese."?
no

Not all construction workers dig in the background by a bulldozer.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Young child plays on a swing set as construction workers dig in the background."
Hypothesis: "A kid swings as workers in hardhats use a bulldozer."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell