Instructions: Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no".
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
Input: >>If you had told me 5 years ago someone was destroying 2,387 vintage Star Wars figures I would have freaked out at the loss. But thanks to Disney, I don't care!! It's actually impressive how they took the most profitable IP of all time and made it worthless. > >I'm a bit confused how not liking the last movie(s) in a series suddenly makes all the enjoyment you had in the previous media disappear. I mean, I was pretty pissed off with Mass Effect 3, but my 400 hours in the ME1 and ME2 didn't vanish and I still enjoyed the multiplayer. Imagine being reminded of your ex cheating on you every time you cuddle with your current significant other. Not to say this is reasonable or healthy, but it's understandable and plausible. And, before sequence of events gets argued, you can still apply this to past experiences. Those 400 hours you spent with the ex, no matter how enjoyable at the time, were spoiled when they cheated on you. Again, only an analogy.
Output:
no