Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: I have a lot of British friends who are more involved in American politics than most Americans. So in exchange I confront them about the real heir to the British throne, the Australian man claiming to be Charles' and Camilla's love child from the '60s. He lives in Australia and has 9 kids. So all nine of his kids would also be in the succession for the throne! I think America should be ready to go to war on behalf of the rightful king of England!
Example Output: No

Example Input: Hot doesn't necessarily mean there is a fire hazard. Conditions in the forest have to be very dry, and that wasn't the case back in the 70's and 80's. Then it was hot but the forests were still wet. The trees weren't dried out. So while the weather may be similar, the climate can still be different and its the changing climate leading to increased fire hazard.
Example Output: No

Example Input: And if they take action BEFORE a criminal conviction they set themselves up for a lawsuit brought on by those that they have taken adverse action against while lacking "the training the skill the resources to do it in-house" to do a proper investigation. Such an approach is and will be a disaster for universities and colleges.
Example Output:
No