Instructions: In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
Input: it is unlikely that similar circumstances will often be replicated, but where a judge does come to have no matter how extrajudicial ""personal knowledge"" of a ""disputed evidentiary fact[],"" as we conclude was the case here, the trial judge is required to recuse herself under subsection (a) of canon 3(e)(1); model judicial code, rule 2.11(a)(1).
Output:
non-overruling