IN: This is an email
Please mark your calendar with a Pulp Weekly Meeting scheduled by Rodney Malcolm for every Monday at 9:00am to 10:00am in conference room ECS 04075. The London team will be participating via video conference. Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: Pulp Weekly Meeting - REMINDER

IN: This is an email
Alicia The only comment that I have to the swap schedules is that I think we need to have an exception built into the arbitration language that permits us to go to court to enforce the remedies that we describe in the confidentiality section. This probably hold true for all of the docs where we have arbitration and a ca provision. Alos, there may be some defined terms that are now used in the new confidentiality language that haven't been defined (i.e, Enron, Enron Put Agreement etc) Finally, should we upper case "affiliates" in the confidentiality language and either use the ISDA def or some other def? Carol

What is the subject?

OUT: Comments

IN: This is an email
Guys, At the Board meeting yesterday, WPTF agreed to consider being involved in the utility procurement case. AReM is also reviewing its participation as is IEP. IEP should play a major role -- they have serious concerns that the CPUC will attempt to reinstate integrated resource planning and the evil BRPU. WPTF will have its attorney review the utility filings due on November 21, and prepare summary comments for WPTF as a starting point for detrrmining the WPTF position. The board agreed to hold a teleconference on November 28 to decide on its position. With all these groups involved, I think Enron will be able to coordinate its issues through them and avoid being in the case separately.

What is the subject?

OUT:
WPTF Considers Participating in Procurement OIR