IN: This is an email
David: I will try to call you before I leave work today to follow up with any questions you may have with respect to the following items: (1) I am having the Representative Agreement executed by ENA and will return an original to your attention. Shari suggested that Susan Musch initial the agreement and Susan is out until May 22. (2) The ENA/Aquila weather deal has not been finalized ONLY because I have been waiting to actually view the Floating Price source materials which our traders have never been able to produce or cite a reference to (so that I could view). There is no problem with the deal. (3) As a policy matter for Enron Australia Finance Pty. Limited, do you always agree to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of New South Wales as opposed to arbitration? I am negotiating the ENA/ABN AMRO (Australian branch) futures agreement and am trying to determine appropriate jurisdiction. (4) ENA is attempting to draft an ISDA Master Agreement with a company incorporated in New Guinea (which may have a US office). I don't know a darn thing about New Guinea law. Do you happen to know if we've ever dealt in New Guinea, any lawyers located in New Guinea, what law is used (I guess New Guinea!) or whether it's similar to other PacRim countries? I'll speak with you later. Regards. Sara

What is the subject?

OUT: Australian matters

IN: This is an email
Sara: I heard rumors today about the move next week so I called Joya. We need to pack up your office by 5 pm next Thurs. (8/24). I'll order the boxes. Kaye

What is the subject?

OUT: You move next Thursday

IN: This is an email
Curriculum Review Task Force Report # 11 (December 4, 2001) The draft educational goals were reviewed in a "committee of the whole" discussion at the November faculty meeting. Several good suggestions were made during the nearly one-hour discussion. The current secretary of the task force, Ms. Susan Dagit, took extensive notes of this discussion. In addition, two faculty members provided some written comments after the meeting. The task force is currently working on the revision of the educational goals based on the suggestions made by the faculty. The task force has also been planning for a while the work to be done after the educational goals are finalized. The November 26 meeting was fully devoted to this discussion. The following steps are envisaged at this time: 1. To examine carefully the current academic program on the basis of the educational goals. 2. To keep on the table the curricular initiatives which came out of the Purser-Gans conference and the intensive summer work. 3. To develop a four-year matrix for a well-planned integrated curriculum based on items 1 and 2 above. 4. To continue deliberations on calendar, organizational structure, workload and other issues which have a direct bearing on the curriculum. Full details of these discussions are available in the detailed minutes posted in the public folders. To access them, please go to Public Folders, All Public Folders, Documents, College, Curriculum Review Task Force. Raj Ambrose Chair

What is the subject?

OUT:
Monmouth College CRTF Report #11