Q: If But for the Flytrapped president, it's better than nothing., can we say that "It was greater than having zero."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"France is internationally acknowledged to be a leader in high technology and is happy to share its pride in these advances."
Hypothesis: France is happy to share the story of their technology with anyone.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: When he finally succeeded, after a prolonged siege and heavy losses, he punished the local population by cutting off the noses and lips of all men except those who played wind instruments. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"All men who played wind instruments were tasked with helping cut off people's noses. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "yeah to to actually support it you know it would be just like saying that you know what are what are you crazy i mean there", can we conclude that "Supporting it would mean you're crazy!"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Limitations on total emissions.

Sentence B: The emissions are unlimited.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Sentence A: The loss of a federal grant has stymied plans for the Senior Legal Hotline to expand its free legal services statewide.

Sentence B: Legal services were expanded nation wide thanks to a federal grant.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no