In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
Example: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Example solution: Sexual-explicit
Example explanation: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.

Problem: Comment: "When will this charade end? What, this jerk is going to have his wages garnished? Forever?"

Oh, it gets even better. Recently, there was a story of someone who was "ordered" to pay a large amount while granting ridiculously small payments. Some years go by and only a fraction of it got paid WITH the explanation of "the order" expiring BECAUSE the entity owed wasn't granted a "judgment" for the amount, which is good for 10 years and renewable for another 10.

Oh, and the order they said was expired? In reality, it wasn't because the statute says a debt expires six years from the date of last payment yet the State wasn't bright enough to know that so they just said it was expired.
Solution: Non-sexual-explicit