In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: And it is impossible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing upon the First Amendment question, which, to repeat, is whether the funding scheme is 'manipulated' to have a 'coercive effect' on those who do not hold the subsidized position. Choices: 1. It is not possible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing on the First Amendment question. 2. The difference from Rust on the First Amendment question is very noticeable. 3. The question that was asked it really rather very subjective.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: Information that is the basis for entry of data into a computer. Choices: 1. Information that isn't the basis for entering data into a computer. 2. Information that is the basis for entry of data into a computer. 3. It's difficult to find the data once it has been entered into the computer.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: There WAS some one in the house! Choices: 1. Someone came into the house. 2. Someone broke into the house and robbed us. 3. No one was ever in the house.
[EX A]:
1