Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.
--------
Question: Context: A patient with a suspected cervical spine injury may be at risk for secondary neurologic injury when initially placed and repositioned to the center of the spine board.', 'We sought to determine which centering adjustment best limits cervical spine movement and minimizes the chance for secondary injury.', 'Using five lightly embalmed cadaveric specimens with a created global instability at C5-C6, motion sensors were anchored to the anterior surface of the vertebral bodies. Three repositioning methods were used to center the cadavers on the spine board: horizontal slide, diagonal slide, and V-adjustment. An electromagnetic tracking device measured angular (degrees) and translation (millimeters) motions at the C5-C6 level during each of the three centering adjustments. The dependent variables were angular motion (flexion-extension, axial rotation, lateral flexion) and translational displacement (anteroposterior, axial, and medial-lateral).', 'The nonuniform condition produced significantly less flexion-extension than the uniform condition (p=0.048). The horizontal slide adjustment produced less cervical flexion-extension (p=0.015), lateral bending (p=0.003), and axial rotation (p=0.034) than the V-adjustment. Similarly, translation was significantly less with the horizontal adjustment than with the V-adjustment; medial-lateral (p=0.017), axial (p<0.001), and anteroposterior (p=0.006).
Answer: Of the three adjustments, our team found that horizontal slide was also easier to complete than the other methods. The horizontal slide best limited cervical spine motion and may be the most helpful for minimizing secondary injury based on the study findings.

Answer: Does horizontal Slide create Less Cervical Motion When Centering an Injured Patient on a Spine Board?

Question: Context: Genetic haploinsufficiency of SYNGAP1/Syngap1 commonly occurs in developmental brain disorders, such as intellectual disability, epilepsy, schizophrenia, and autism spectrum disorder. Thus, studying mouse models of Syngap1 haploinsufficiency may uncover pathologic developmental processes common among distinct brain disorders.', 'A Syngap1 haploinsufficiency model was used to explore the relationship between critical period dendritic spine abnormalities, cortical circuit assembly, and the window for genetic rescue to understand how damaging mutations disrupt key substrates of mouse brain development.', 'Syngap1 mutations broadly disrupted a developmentally sensitive period that corresponded to the period of heightened postnatal cortical synaptogenesis. Pathogenic Syngap1 mutations caused a coordinated acceleration of dendrite elongation and spine morphogenesis and pruning of these structures in neonatal cortical pyramidal neurons. These mutations also prevented a form of developmental structural plasticity associated with experience-dependent reorganization of brain circuits. Consistent with these findings, Syngap1 mutant mice displayed an altered pattern of long-distance synaptic inputs into a cortical area important for cognition. Interestingly, the ability to genetically improve the behavioral endophenotype of Syngap1 mice decreased slowly over postnatal development and mapped onto the developmental period of coordinated dendritic insults.
Answer: Pathogenic Syngap1 mutations have a profound impact on the dynamics and structural integrity of pyramidal cell postsynaptic structures known to guide the de novo wiring of nascent cortical circuits. These findings support the idea that disrupted critical periods of dendritic growth and spine plasticity may be a common pathologic process in developmental brain disorders.

Answer: Does syngap1 haploinsufficiency damage a postnatal critical period of pyramidal cell structural maturation linked to cortical circuit assembly?

Question: Context: Patients sensitized to airborne fungi such as Alternaria alternata and Cladosporium herbarum often also show positive skin prick test results and specific serum IgE antibodies to a yeast, Pityrosporum ovale. We examined whether part of the IgE binding to these fungi is explained by cross-reacting mould and yeast allergens.', 'Serum samples from 36 patients with positive skin prick test to A. alternata or C. herbarum were analyzed for IgE antibodies to fungal extracts by ELISA and immunoblot analysis. Cross-reactivity between mould and yeast extracts was studied by ELISA and immunoblot inhibition assays. In further analysis, the mannan-containing glycoproteins were removed from the yeast extract by concanavalin A-Sepharose chromatography, and the IgE binding properties of the extracts were compared.', 'Serum IgE reactivity to P. ovale was found in 40% of the mould-sensitized patients. The IgE antibody binding to A. alternata and C. herbarum moulds was partially inhibited by the yeast P. ovale in ELISA and immunoblot inhibition assays. When the glycoproteins were removed from the extract, cross-reactivity was markedly reduced.
Answer: Part of the IgE binding to mould and yeast allergen extracts is due to cross-reacting glycoproteins. False-positive IgE and skin prick test results should be taken into account in the diagnosis of mould allergy.

Answer:
Do cladosporium herbarum and Pityrosporum ovale allergen extracts share cross-reacting glycoproteins?