input question: For scenario C, program spending increased by $1. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Program spending plummeted "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "The audit report should include the objectives, scope, and methodology; the audit results, including findings, conclusions, and recommendations, as appropriate; a reference to compliance with generally accepted government auditing standards; the views of responsible officials; and, if applicable, the nature of any privileged and confidential information omitted.", can we conclude that "The audit report should have the methodology included."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Located just north of the Wenatchee Valley Mall, the park had been threatened with closure for more than a year.

Sentence B: The park had been relatively safe while the mall had been threatened with closure.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: and we just everything just piled up wrecked the car and you know in order to do that we had to you know we was paying
We were lucky not to have wrecked the car.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
This city of a thousand fountains, huge plane trees, and a sprawling fortress was probably founded by Hannibal in 219 b.c.

Here is a hypothesis:
Hannibal lived in the city for many years.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
You're safe.

Does it follow that "You are in great peril."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no