IN: This is an email
As part of the HPL transition, we are reviewing imbalances on shipper contracts. Attached below is the list and where we stand on reconcilations. About 50% are reconciled, meaning that the counterparty agrees with our number. Most we are waiting on information from the counterparty. The big items are the imbalances with Duke Energy, Gulf Energy, and Tejas. Rita and I have people working with these counterparties to get good information. thanks

What is the subject?

OUT: HPLC Imbalance File

IN: This is an email
Details in exchange for this - I read an article this morning that quoted an ISO market analyst speaking about the $6.2 billion the system operator would like to recover in charges since last spring: "We are not saying now that these are overcharges. We are telling the FERC that we see these as the amounts that we deem 'excessive.'" The lead of the story was this: "The California Independent System Operator......significantly upped the ante Thursday when it told the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that 21 generators and suppliers should refund the state a stunning $6.2 billion for electricity sold into the state since last May." First of all, tell me what the difference is between "overcharges" and "excessive" charges. If there isn't one, give me your opinion on why this analyst would say such a stupid thing. Second, give me one reason why the lead is journalistically incorrect, and one why it is gramatically unattractive. Then you get details. Kate

What is the subject?

OUT: Date details

IN: This is an email
Mark, Could you please check to see if we ever got paid by Vitol under contract YC2758.1. The contract was a sale by Enron Clean Fuels Company to Vitol S.A. Inc for 30,000 bbls +/- 5% of MTBE @ $.7225/gal. We are currently holding a letter of credit for this transaction which expires on 12/28/01. Regards,

What is the subject?

OUT:
Vitol - YC2758.1