instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: Right Steve, because the McGuinty, Butts, Wynne's "green" plan is paying off in spades... the Ontario Liberals are a national embarrassment, they have no credibility and their "green" plan has turned out to be an absolute failure. Canadians who actually work for a living understand this, the smug limousine liberals who will be protected by fat golden pensions couldn't care less about rising costs of living and weaker economic competitiveness, it's not going to have any material impact on Wynne's ability to sip daiquiris in Cabo. This new tax will hurt working Canadians with higher living expenses and less economic opportunity.Trudeau operates with a smug sense of unearned entitlement, he lives in a cushioned dream of puff and ignorance. Butts sewered Ontario and now he wants to double down with the same incompetent policies on the rest of Canada.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit

question:
Comment: The way the state runs, these ridiculous laws always cost more to enforce then they ever bring in. There are already fines in place for littering and money isn't motivating the state to enforce those more vigorously.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit

question:
Comment: "Boo hoo: Canadian babies cry
more but why?

Because third-world countries, to which number belongs Canada, have complex problems affecting all aspects of life. Canada will never attain European standards.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit