Question: Sentence A: As drafted, S. 556 would make some existing requirements unnecessary, but would not eliminate them.

Sentence B: The unnecessary requirements will be eliminated.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: yeah you know the less actually the less you spend on a car it seems like luxury cars they're called luxury cars even though they're much more expensive like like uh um a Mercedes Benz they don't have the history of breaking down or things like that that would go wrong would definitely not be considered disposable
Mercedes Benz is an expensive luxury car.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
It builds enormously expensive plants that employ blue-collar workers, even if they are wearing bunny suits.

Here is a hypothesis:
Many blue collar workers are employed at the expensive plants.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: 2) And yet you secretly desire one so you can capture some magical moments from your childhood.

Sentence 2: You want one so you can relive crashing your bike and breaking your arm at age 8.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Is there another amateur among Slate 's readers who would like to pick up the challenge?

Does it follow that "Slate has a lot of amateurs among its readers."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Britain began taking India more seriously.", can we conclude that "India was taken more seriously by Britain with time."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes