TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
PROBLEM: This decision, Cases v US, is where the militia connection qualification (fn2) was born and another, US v Tot is where the "state's right" interpretations (fn3) came into being

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: That right there is reason enough not to give government absolute control over firearms.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: No, the gun (+one set of ammo) still costs more than restocking pepper spray for a lifetime (calculation: pepper spray @~7 per year, handgun @~500 = ~71 years)

SOLUTION:
Valid