Question: Sentence A: As discussed, HCFA published the full text of its initial analysis as an appendix to the proposed rule and invited comments from small entities.

Sentence B: HCFA never made its initial analysis available as an appendix.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: 'In that case,' Derry had advised, 'answer however the hell you like.
You must stick to a set script when answering the questions.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
This is an approach that is frequently used because engineers have developed cost effective methods to install the SCR reactor while addressing potential interferences from existing equipment.

Here is a hypothesis:
This approach is never used because engineers hate it.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Supreme Court -- tramples on individual rights and harms the very people public housing authorities are supposed to help.

Sentence 2: The Supreme Court infringes on individuals rights when it comes to marriage.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Although in 88 b.c. , Mithradates made a swift and successful raid from the East across Asia Minor and the Aegean Islands, the next major power change brought influence from the West.

Does it follow that "He raided from the East across Asia Minor."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "but you know it's it's similar to a lobster too because the tail has got the little pleats in it like a lobster would", can we conclude that "It's nothing like a lobster tail which has little pleats. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no