In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: The White House official position is that they're sweeping any and all allegations of sex assault under the rug and deflect to Banghazi and Hillary's e-mails. Trump's twitter posts are not to be disrespected because he is the dictator of America. They've been very clear that they are going to continue witch hunts on Hillary... Look a squirrel... God help us. We have to bend over and get screwed by this administration.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Oh, those 'naughty' BC Liberals! First, Christy shrugs and says, "The BC voters don't care corrupt we are.", then disappears until the whole thing blows over (she hopes). Then her deputy crime boss, Rich Coleman comes out and throws their donors under the bus. If that wasn't bad enough, Suzanne Anton, Attorney General, stands up in QP and throws their lobbyists under the bus. Who's next?

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Wrong comparison. Mattis is Secretary of Defense. Monsef is Minister of Status of Women. He is qualified for his role, she is qualified for her role. There have been questions about the wisdom of having so many military people in cabinet roles in the US, but as they are the most competent of Trump's group of losers it is a good thing they are there. Tillerson has been a weak and ineffective Secretary of State. Freeland looks less qualified on paper, but has been much more effective. This may reflect the relative competence of the two leaders though. Trudeau has been more effective than Trump.

A:
Non-identity-attack
****