Given the Question and Answer pair, detect whether the answer is acceptable or not. Denote acceptable answer as "yes", otherwise denote as "no". An acceptable answer is consistent with the context in question, detailed, long, and uses general knowledge of English. Answers that are not definite and suggest a variety of options are not acceptable answers.

Ex Input:
Question: Is it possible to use the abbreviation "w.r.t." in academic papers?
Answer: David Foster Wallace uses this abbreviation all the time. It's awesome. Depends on the tone you are going for; DFW uses it to evidence his desire for efficient language is on balance with his sprawling analysis of 'ineffable' artistic topics. I agree with it's use in a mathematician's paper, as efficiency is prized in that study. History, humanities, etc - it's a no go. Oh yeah, I'm a mere BA holder, so account for that in your advice acceptance criteria.

Ex Output:
no

Ex Input:
Question: What's a word that means "not knowing everything"? This would serve as a complementary antonym of omniscient, which means having infinite knowledge, or simply "all-knowing". Thesaurus.com shows these possible words: stupid (opposite of being clever, which = being omniscient) unknowing (opposite of being knowing, which = being omniscient) fallible (opposite of being infallible, which means "not able to make mistakes", which = being omniscient, since I can know everything and still make mistakes) erring (which means "capable of making mistakes", which = being omniscient, since I can know everything and still make mistakes) imperfect (opposite of being perfect, which is a superset of being omniscient... how could I be perfect if I'm both omniscient and fallible?) faulty (which means "to have fault(s) / defect(s)", is the opposite of "to have no fault(s) / defect(s)", which means being perfect, which = being omniscient) ignorant (which means "having inadequate knowledge", is the opposite of "having adequate knowledge", which = having infinite knowledge) uneducated (opposite of being educated, which = being omniscient) unaware (opposite of being aware, which = being omniscient) uninformed (opposite of being informed, which = being omniscient) Yet, none of them are true antonyms for omniscient. Is there an alternative?
Answer: I suggest that ignorant is the opposite.

Ex Output:
no

Ex Input:
Question: What does "I'm game" mean and what is its correct usage?
Answer: I'm game means that I am up for the challenge, but arguably more commonly, I agree... Q: Fancy going for a drink? A: Sure, I'm game... or Q: I was thinking of going shopping. Do you want to come? A: Yes, I'm game... As for correct usage, as with most idioms, use it as you will... there is no correct usage as such.

Ex Output:
yes