In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: And it is impossible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing upon the First Amendment question, which, to repeat, is whether the funding scheme is 'manipulated' to have a 'coercive effect' on those who do not hold the subsidized position. Choices: 1. It is not possible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing on the First Amendment question. 2. The difference from Rust on the First Amendment question is very noticeable. 3. The question that was asked it really rather very subjective.
[A]: 1

[Q]: Statement: How maddening, cried Tuppence. Choices: 1. Tuppence thought it was maddening. 2. Tuppence was feeling upset. 3. Tuppence said it was delightful.
[A]: 1

[Q]: Statement: so uh they they've got a lot of sports going on around here Choices: 1. Sports are popular here. 2. Sports are going on a lot around here. 3. There are no sports going on here.
[A]:
2