The following parcel has been rejected : Parcel: 8866 Contract Number: 05715 Path: Kingsgate to Malin Quantity: 10000 Min Release Quantity: 10000 Begin Date: 12/6/2001 End Date: 10/31/2003 The prearranged replacement shipper is: Canadian Natural Resources Limited PG&E National Energy Group and any other company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the regulated California utility. Neither PG&E National Energy Group nor these other referenced companies are regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission. Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company do not have to buy products from these companies in order to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.
Answer: PG&E eTrans Notification - Parcel 8866 has been rejected
Here is an email: I just ran several Shipper Scheduled Quanties reports and discovered the fomat had changed. I monitor several contracts for forecasting purposes and also provide Market Services invoicing information for revenues for negotiated rates and sharing revenues for volumes flowing West for USGT. I rely upon the Shipper Scheduled Quantities report to get the information I need. Before the change, I was able to run 1 report for each of these shippers each week, a total of 3 reports. Because the new report does not give me month-to-date totals I now have to run a report for each shipper for each gas day, a total of 21 reports each week. It is very time consuming to run and analyze all these reports. As Marketing does more of these sort of deals the volume will only grow. It is critical that I get a report that gives me month-to-date totals so I don't have to run a report for each shipper for each day. Is there some way you could revise the report to again show the month-to-date totals? Minor comparisons: 1) The 2nd portion of the original report had an area where you could quickly glance at either your receipt or delivery point totals. In order to get a break out of receipt and delivery points now, you have to run 1 report sorted by receipt point and 1 report by delivery point. 2) This is very minor, but I also liked the fact that the report was on letter size paper. All my files have been set up to accomodate that size of report. I now have to set up new files. I appreciate any help you can give me in this matter. Thanks!
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: TMS Shipper Scheduled Quantities Report
Q: I just noticed that ENA is still agent for CES and CEM on Transco. If we no longer have a need to be agent, I think we should terminate those agencies. What do you think?
Propose a subject line
A: CES
IN: George, Attached for your review and commentary is a copy of a first draft of a presentation that i am creating on EGM. This is for an upcoming analyst presentation and for our ongoing use. Please review and make any comments you feel are needed. Especially focus on coal which is on page 5. Please take a quick look and return your initial comments quickly. I need to get out a new and better draft ASAP. Also, how do we illustrate your business graphically. Please decide, fill in and I'll have our graphics guy make it look pretty. Thanks,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: presentation
IN: This is an email
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL Julia The tax issue, as far as I see it does not do anything for us except put us in the position that we will have to make an application for a power marketing certificate using whatever vehicle provides the tax advisors with the solution they are seeking. With Enron under the spotlight at the moment any filing at FERC would be picked up by the media and could be used to cause untold further damage to Enron's credibility and reputation. We could not for example provide any credible reason for setting up such an entity without revealing our true intent. In addition, the FERC Commissioners are going to be wary about expediting any application at the moment for an Enron entity which does not have an interest in a generating unit, for example. As for Clinton Energy Services Management Inc, which has a power marketing certificate, we are getting an opinion from outside Counsel to confirm that if this entity was moved to become a subsidiary of Enron Corp. that because of the current ownership structure no filing will be necessary with FERC. We at least retain this option and can thereby proceed fairly quickly if required. As to trading without a power marketing certificate I could not support this course of action. In addition, we would probably be in breach of any agreement we have with counterparties enabling them to terminate the agreements immediately. If you need me I will be on 713 533 0313. and will be logged on. Marcus

What is the subject?

OUT: PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
Good Afternoon, The following two counterparties are requesting a netting agreement with ENA: Kennedy Oil, and Independent Production Company, Inc. The netting agreement should cover physical sales and purchases, and MTM. These are both standard netting agreements, not master netting. Both companies sell us gas under a first purchaser agreement and / or GTC's, and will begin buying back gas. For Independent the contract # is 96023736, and for Kennedy 96052164. I have contact names and phone numbers if you need them. Give me a call with any questions. Thanks,
Answer:
Independent Production & Kennedy Oil