This is the content of an email: Charlotte, Michael hasn't bounced back yet - still getting fever up to 102. I spoke with Delores, and she said Rey said that Michael had a pretty good dose of strep, so it will take 6 doses of medicine to get it under control. I'll see how he is in the early am, but I may not take him to school, just so I can watch him another few hours. If you will be at your office tomorrow I'll let you know how he's doing. Maybe I can leave on Saturday. I know he will be very upset if he doesn't get to spend time with you this weekend. Kay

Subject: Michael

This is the content of an email: We have received an executed Letter Agreement in connection with the Interest Rate and Currency Exchange Agreement dated as of April 5, 1994 between ENA and The Chase Manhattan Bank ("Chase") (the "Chase Agreement") and the Master Energy Price Swap Agreement dated as of May 28, 1992 between ENA and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York ("Morgan") (the "Morgan Agreement"). On November 10, 2001 (the "Merger Date"), Morgan will merge with and into Chase and will operate under the name JP Morgan Chase Bank. Upon the Merger Date (1) JP Morgan Chase Bank will succeed to all rights and obligations of Chase and Morgan, (2) all outstanding transactions between ENA and Morgan shall be governed by and subject to the Chase Agreement, and (3) the Morgan Agreement shall be terminated. Copies will be distributed.

Subject: JP Morgan Chase - Executed Letter Agreement

This is the content of an email: Attached please find referenced list. A few notes: No physical power or credit derivatives for any of these Japanese counterparties. Re: Bandwidth, as a general principle, what I'm hearing from the bandwidth lawyers is (1) for Japanese counterparties they can only trade the U.S. segment (which is currently the only segment we have online), and (2) for right now, we have 1 Netherlands and 2 German counterparties on the list, and they are still checking to get the scoop on those countries, so for right now I am shutting them down for bandwidth.

Subject: Japanese Counterparty Approvals

This is the content of an email: Contract Shippers Contract Date 107018 Tenaska Marketing Ventures Nov 1 2000 107019 Texaco Gas Marketing Nov 1 2000 107021 OGE Energy Resources Nov 1 2000 107989 Tenaska Marketing Jun 1 2001 108021 Arkla Energy Marketing Co. Jul 1 2001 108284 Tensaka Marketing Ventures Nov 1 2001 108290 Texaco Gas Marketing Nov 1 2001 108281 El Paso Merchant Energy Nov 1 2001 108282 UtiliCorp United, Inc. Nov 1 2001 108283 Engage Energy American Nov 1 2001 These are the SBA contracts that were provided during the due diligence. I'd like to be able to verify and support that the changes in the business requirements for the scheduling priority for these SBA contracts do not result in an impact to NNG's primary firm shippers. Your assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks MW
Subject: SBA Contracts