Premise:
"uh-huh uh-huh i don't blame you i don't blame you at all years ago it would have been fine but"
Hypothesis: That would not have been fine, even year ago.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: The correction modification seems to have no effect. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The correct modification was executed in a wrong way."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "As recalled by Peter Prichard in his book, The Making of McPaper , Neuharth condemned the old journalism of despair, a derisive technique of leaving readers discouraged, or mad, or indignant.", can we conclude that "Neuharth supported the old journalism of despair."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: It requires, for example, permission from the rabbi and renting from an anti-Semitic landlord.

Sentence B: Permission from the rabbi is reuired when renting from an anti-semitic landlord.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Notice the carved central mihrab (the recess marking the direction of Mecca).
The mihrab is a symbol of Islam.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Sir, excuse me, the terrified, quadrophonic voice of the secretary could be heard again.

Here is a hypothesis:
The voice could not be heard.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no