Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
The writer shouldn't feel too sorry for Chile because they turned against their home-grown socialist problem in the 1970s, rather than become another technological and economic backwater like Cuba. Today Chile is arguably one of the best-run countries in the western hemisphere, economically and politically. Arguably they are even more 'progressive' than the USA - after all, they have already elected a woman president! ;-)

Chile is not a 'third-world' country by any stretch of the imagination, despite what the writer of this letter implies.

Ex Output:
No

Ex Input:
More school yard insults, you really haven't turned over a new leaf have you?

The Supreme Court ruled based on interpretation of the Constitution. It was unanimous, including Republican nominees. I still suggest more sleep, that way your world is of your own creating Booz. The real world most certainly isn't.

Ex Output:
No

Ex Input:
Ugh. That True guy is the worst. He created some fantasy about an indigenous people steeped in Noble Savage-style racism, then ran himself to death because he didn't want to grow up. Should not be famous and definitely should not be thought of as a good example worthy of study. And the "minimalist" trend is over, now we're on to something equally stupid.

Ex Output:
Yes