Q: If Lincoln went down., can we say that "Lincoln descended. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"huh-uh the only thing that i ever felt was every time i stop and start going again because i end up getting two jobs once in a while i end up having to quit for a while but i get blisters on my toes on the bottom because i really jump a lot"
Hypothesis: I ended up getting blisters on my feet.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: Reviewers call it pretentious and filled with inaccurate references to theoretical physics, Walt Whitman, and the Kabbalah. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Reviewers saw the work as not being true and references to theories."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "The credibility of these two studies is further enhanced by the fact that they were subject to extensive reexamination and reanalysis by an independent scientific analysis team of experts compiled by the Health Effects Institute (Krewski et al.", can we conclude that "The credibility of the two studies is enhanced by how they are subject to reexamination. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: The lower floor here houses the throne room with ornate griffin frescoes and a lustral basin for ritual purification.

Sentence B: The upper floor houses even more ornate frescoes in what was once a royal bedroom.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Jon ran his rapier through the horse's flank and into the man's groin.

Sentence B: Jon didn't own a rapier.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no