input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. (CNN) -- Svetlana Kuznetsova drew on her vast experience to keep Russia in contention for a fifth Fed Cup tennis title in the final against the Czech Republic on Saturday.

The 26-year-old, who featured in three of her nation's four winning line-ups between 2004 and 2008, helped Russia end the first day on level terms in Moscow after world No. 2 Petra Kvitova continued her remarkable year.

Kvitova, who last weekend added the season-ending WTA Championships title to her July Wimbledon crown, gave the visiting Czechs a 1-0 lead when she beat Maria Kirilenko 6-2 6-2 in the opening singles rubber.

Kuznetsova lost both of her singles matches in the 2004 final, a 3-2 win over France sealed in the deciding doubles tie, but was undefeated in four finals outings in 2007-08.

The former U.S. Open and French Open champion continued that winning run as she beat Lucie Safarova 6-2 6-3.

"I felt colossal pressure. But if I was playing that rubber in the year 2004, I think I would feel really tight and jittery," she told the Fed Cup website.

"Now I have more expertise, and that expertise helped me to motivate myself and to motivate myself in the right direction."

Kuznetsova, ranked 19th, will take on the 21-year-old Kvitova in Sunday's opening reverse singles rubber in their first career meeting.

Kirilenko has a 4-1 career record over Safarova, but they have not met since 2009.

The Czechs have not won the title since 1988, which came five years before the formation of the republic and Slovakia. 1. What happened over the weekend?
2. Who won?
3. What happened over summer?
4. Were those her only wins?
5. Who lost in 2004?
6. What had she lost?
7. Was she a novice then?
8. Is she ranked top ten?
9. Who is her next match against?
10. When?
11. Have they opposed one another before?
12. Who last met in 2009?
13. When was the czechs last win?
14. What did not exist then?
15. When were they formed?
16. Who beat someone 6-2 6-3?
17. Who did she beat?
18. When is the final?
19. When did someone havea perfect record?
20. Who was it?
numbered_answers: 1. WTA Championships title
2. Kvitova
3. She won Wimbledon crown.
4. No, her fifth.
5. Kuznetsova.
6. Both of her singles matches
7. Yes.
8. 19th
9. Kvitova
10. Sunday
11. Their first meeting.
12. Kirilenko and Safarova,
13. 1988
14. The republic and Slovakia.
15. five years later.
16. Kuznetsova.
17. She beat Lucie Safarova.
18. On Saturday.
19. 2007-08.
20. Kuznetsova.

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. The Mahabharata is one of the two major Sanskrit epics of ancient India, the other being the "Ramayana".

The "Mahabharata" is an epic narrative of the Kuruksetra War and the fates of the Kaurava and the Pandava princes. It also contains philosophical and devotional material, such as a discussion of the four "goals of life" or "purusartha" (12.161). Among the principal works and stories in the "Mahabharata" are the "Bhagavadgita", the story of Damayanti, an abbreviated version of the "Ramayana", and the story of Rsyasringa, often considered as works in their own right.

Traditionally, the authorship of the "Mahabharata" is attributed to Vyasa. There have been many attempts to unravel its historical growth and compositional layers. The oldest preserved parts of the text are thought to be not much older than around 400BCE, though the origins of the epic probably fall between the 8th and 9th centuries BCE. The text probably reached its final form by the early Gupta period (c. 4th century CE). The title may be translated as "the great tale of the Bharata dynasty". According to the "Mahabharata" itself, the tale is extended from a shorter version of 24,000 verses called simply "Bharata".

The "Mahabharata" is the longest epic poem known and has been described as "the longest poem ever written". Its longest version consists of over 100,000 "sloka" or over 200,000 individual verse lines (each shloka is a couplet), and long prose passages. About 1.8million words in total, the "Mahabharata" is roughly ten times the length of the "Iliad" and the "Odyssey" combined, or about four times the length of the "Ramayana". W. J. Johnson has compared the importance of the "Mahabharata" in the context of world civilization to that of the Bible, the works of Shakespeare, the works of Homer, Greek drama, or the Qur'an. 1. what are the 2 major Sanskrit epics of india
2. what is the longest epic poem known
3. what has compared the importance mahabharata to that of the bible
4. is the tail extended from a shorter version
5. what is Rsyasringa concidered
6. was the title translated
7. how old is it
8. does it compare to a greek drama
9. what about works of shakespear
10. and the qur an
numbered_answers: 1. Mahabharata and the "Ramayana".
2. "Mahabharata"
3. . W. J. Johnson
4. yes
5. a work in its own right.
6. yes
7. around 400BCE
8. yes
9. yes
10. yes

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. In law and government, de jure (; , "in law") describes practices that are legally recognized by official laws. In contrast, ("in fact" or "in practice") describes situations that are generally known to exist in reality, even if not legally authorized. The terms are often used to contrast different scenarios, for example, "I know that, de jure, this is supposed to be a parking lot, but now that the flood has left four feet of water here, it's a de facto swimming pool".

It is possible to have multiple simultaneous conflicting ("de jure") legalities, possibly none of which is in force ("de facto"). After seizing power in 1526, Ahmad ibn Ibrahim al-Ghazi made his brother, Umar Din, the lawful ("de jure") Sultan of Adal. Ahmad, however, was in practice ("de facto") the actual Sultan, and his brother was a figurehead. Between 1805 and 1914, the ruling dynasty of Egypt ruled as "de jure" viceroys of the Ottoman Empire, but acted as "de facto" independent rulers who maintained a polite fiction of Ottoman suzerainty. However, from about 1882, the rulers had only "de jure" rule over Egypt, as it had by then become a British puppet state. Thus, Egypt was by Ottoman law "de jure" a province of the Ottoman Empire, but "de facto" was part of the British Empire. 1. What is the topic of conversation?
2. Is there a specific practice?
3. Who was Adal's Sultan?
4. Who was in practice?
5. When did Egypt rule?
6. What law did they fall under?
7. What is de jure and de facto used to contrast?
8. What relationship did Egypt have with Britain?
9. And what was it referred to around 1882?
10. Can you have more than one conflict at once?
numbered_answers:
1. Different kinds of laws
2. de jure
3. Umar Din
4. Ahmad,
5. Between 1805 and 1914
6. de jure
7. situations
8. de facto
9. a British puppet state
10. yes