In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: And, finally:
.
"We'd be in uncharted territory, that is unarguable."
.
What nonsense.
.
The vast majority of democracies world-wide use PR. Are you really suggesting Canadians are too dumb to figure it out?
.
Or are you merely suggesting that it only works in countries where the populations once worshipped Odin, Thor, and Freya?
.
Bring on Bugs Bunny, Elmer Fudd, and the Wagnerian opera ...

Ex Output:
Non-obscene

Ex Input:
Comment: the term lady does not apply

Ex Output:
Non-obscene

Ex Input:
Comment: There would be many fewer dead without the bump stocks. For better or worse they do make it easier to shoot very fast and at least somewhat accurately. But hey, this is the price of freedom, right?

Next time an Islamic Terrorist decides to shoot up a Christmas party, don't complain, because, hey it is just the price of freedom, right?

Had this guy been Muslim, you would be screaming for restrictions on anyone coming here from the Middle East, or whatever nation he came from. You would be screaming that they want to kill us all, but since he is a white guy, all you can do is try to defend owning the types of guns that make this kind of massacre possible.

I am a gun owner and am becoming more and more disgusted with the freak show that gun ownership has become.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene