instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
I got the point. Richard, and apparently, you and your husband, think they are entitled to FREE stuff. Highly suggest you get off whatever pedestal you think you are on as a fellow taxpayer.

These people are taking from a private charity. When Obamacare was being debated, conservatives said we didn't need it, because private charity would take care of them. Now apparently, you are opposed to private charity helping the low-income workers, too. Disgusting!
answer:
No

question:
When the Wehrmacht had belt buckles which claimed that "Gott Mit Uns"; the Japanese had the code Bushido which authorized and encouraged the beheading of any opponent who surrendered as being a "dishonorable" person (and did so from the battle of Midway on), and committed The Rape of Nanking, the Korean "comfort women's" enslavement; and the US and Great Britain and its allies chose to allow the continued extermination of the Jews and all those other undesirables in the Nazi death camps for strategic reasons; when Russia, once they were any ally, was encouraged by the other allies to commit their atrocities wherever they conquered, 'moral superiority' is virtually an invisible commodity by any National participant.

The victors wrote the histories. That is your 'moral superiority' in World War II.
answer:
Yes

question:
Sorry, not gonna take that from you. Folks in the melanistically-challenged section of the bleachers dealt that deck, and now don't like being called on it when they try to deal from the bottom.

Would you like a little cheese with your whine?
answer:
Yes