QUESTION: Dear Mr. Whitt, It is a pleasure to announce our ninth annual Aspen Clean Energy Roundtable. In keeping with our continual renewal of spirit and enthusiasm, we are holding this event in spring 2002. This will be our first ski-season Roundtable! ASPEN CLEAN ENERGY ROUNDTABLE IX The Aspen Meadows Resort, March 21-23, 2002 - THURS, March 21: Travel to Aspen; evening registration & reception - FRI, March 22: Roundtable sessions & discussions, gala dinner - SAT, March 23: Morning Roundtable sessions; optional afternoon discussion - SUN, March 24: Departures We are excited to meet in early spring in Colorado, and hope these dates work for you. A preliminary program will be posted on our website next week. The Aspen Clean Energy Roundtable was created in 1994 to discuss investment in clean and sustaining energy and transportation technology solutions. These include hybrid & electric automobiles, microturbines, fuel cells, hydrogen production & storage, batteries, and distributed energy systems. Energy security will again be a key component of this year?s discussion, which will include policy and investment implications for oil, gas, coal, nuclear, and renewable energy. Innovative technologies will again be highlighted. The Aspen Meadows will be an ideal venue for this year?s Roundtable (please note this event is not connected with the Aspen Institute). Participation is strictly limited to 100 senior executives. All sessions are "off the record" in order to facilitate an open dialogue. Spouses are welcome! There will be ample skiing opportunities before and after the Roundtable. I am also pleased to share that we will soon open our new office in Denver, Colorado. Our new phone and fax details will be provided shortly; in the meantime, please contact me via my email address. We hope you can join us in Aspen in March! Yours truly, Andrew Andrew W. Bermingham Managing Director aberm@montreuxenergy.com
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Aspen Clean Energy Roundtable to be held MARCH 21-23, 2002
Keith, The article I mentioned. Vince *********************************************** rashed By Tax Selling But are there bargains among the discards? By Michael Santoli Here it is more than six months since even the most intransigent last-minute filers wrote checks to the IRS to render to the government its due for their financial good fortune in 1999. By rights, this should be a season relatively free of concerns about taxes, notwithstanding the presidential candidates' parrying over whose tax-cut math features more fuzz. And yet, for anyone with a dollar in the stock market (which in recent weeks has likely been reduced to loose change), the looming demands of this year's levies on capital gains have helped to make this month yet another taxing October for investors. The jump-and-stumble course the major stock indexes have taken this year is being blamed for a particularly intense effort among mutual-fund managers and other big investors to sell their losers. The steep ramp-up in stocks that persisted from the fall of 1999 through the first quarter of this year
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Article
To the West Desk et al: The FERC's west-wide price cap has been raised to at least $108/MWh beginning today through 30 April 02. Please see the order excerpt below. Although market prices are well below both the old and new cap, the new cap will give the markets more breathing room if there is an unexpected cold snap and/or supply disruption. I am happy to report that the one of Enron's advocacy messages made it into the order: any change to the cap must be applied West-wide. PNW parties and Duke were willing to settle with region-specific caps but FERC rejected that concept in favor of a single, West-wide value. Alan Comnes Relevant Passage: "Effective on the trading day following the date of this order, through April 30, 2002, we will suspend the methodology used to calculate the current mitigated price and substitute the following West-wide winter season methodology. As a starting point, the mitigated price will be set at $108/MWh. This is the actual mitigated price set using the current methodology during the last reserve deficiency on May 31, 2001, based on a gas index of $6.641/MMBtu, a generating unit with a heat rate of approximately 15,360 Btu/MWh and $6.00 for the O&M adder. The new interim mitigated price will supersede the existing mitigated price (approximately $92/MWh), which was set at eighty-five percent of the originally calculated $108/MWh mitigated price for application during non-reserve deficiency hours. We find this adjustment necessary to set the price for the winter period and to track changes in the gas indices. The winter formula will maintain the current heat rate and O&M adder. The one variable in the formula will be tied to the current average of the mid-point for the monthly bid-week index prices reported for SoCal Gas (large packages), Malin and PG&E city-gate. Under the winter season formula, the mitigated price will be recalculated when the average gas price rises by a minimum factor of 10 percent (e.g., to $7.305/MMBtu) effective for the following trading day. The formula will also track subsequent cumulative changes of at least 10 percent (including reductions of 10 percent, but not less than a floor of $108/Mwh). Effective on May 1, 2002, the summer methodology will be reinstated along with the current mitigated price of approximately $92/Mwh for non-emergency periods."
Answer: Details on the West-wide Price cap: now $108/MWh through April 30, 2002.
Here is an email: John, Attached for your review is the process that I am pursuing at Mariner. I would like to discuss it with you tomorrow if you are available in person or by phone. Also, it appears that Mariner has another discovery in its Swordfish prospect. The results from the 1st well are positive and we are preparing to drill the 2nd well in the next few days. Second well will be down around Christmas. A definitive economic impact is impossible to provide at this point but could be in the $15-$25 million range +. Scott <<Restructure 11-20-01.doc>> - Restructure 11-20-01.doc
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Mariner
Q: Jeff, Below is an email from John. Please let me know how to respond. I know yo= u=20 guys talked about this. Thor was in the loop here wasn't he? I know we to= ok=20 out the Thor reporting piece but in reality they do report up through him. = =20 How many people do we expect in London? John and I did talk about this and= I=20 didn't really think of it lately. Mike
Propose a subject line
A: Organizational Announcement - revised comments
Here is an email: Rick, Attached is the significantly scaled down version of the RAC presentation we anticipate using for the taped Bloomberg mid-year credit review. Please let me know if you have any comments or other changes once you have had a chance to review. As we discussed earlier, we do not yet know when the taping will be. If it is after August 15th, we will plan on working with Bill Bradford and Dave Gorte on this. Thanks. Shirley
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
RAC Presentation for Bloomberg