In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Zuma fires competent ministers but retains incompetenet lying ministers such as Dlamini. She should be fired as a minister and taken out of Parliament, as she makes a mockery of the institution. One wonders why she is allowed to act as she does-unilaterally. The other question that should be asked is whether she has paid the court costs and show proof that the payment was out of her own pocket
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[Q]: Comment: ""Have you forgoten Okalahoma? Just a good ole country boy. lol""

And are terrorists more likely to come from Muslim countries or from Oklahoma?
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[Q]: Comment: Enough of this garbage. I come from the UK where my ancestors were invaded by the Romans and the French. Are any of these Countries paying reparations? No. If we are upsetting the aboriginals we should stop all payments to them until we figure out and agree to what they want. Meanwhile they can live quite comfortably on what their chiefs and tribal councils have squirrelled away.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit