Teacher: In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Reason: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

Now, solve this instance: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Violent and Repeat Offender
Accountability Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

(a) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
(1) it is the responsibility of the Federal Government to
provide States help in certain areas, including efforts to
reduce violent crime;
(2) Federal legislation relating to criminal justice,
including the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Act (''RICO'') and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, has been
very effective in dealing with crimes to which the legislation
applies;
(3) the responsibility for protecting citizens against most
violent crimes and for punishing most violent criminal
offenders is primarily a matter of State and local governance;
(4) violent crimes nationwide have risen dramatically and
constitute a national priority of the highest order;
(5) the persistence and increasing incidence of violent
crime, despite the efforts of State and local governments, has
resulted in a vastly increased Federal role in this area, and
there is pressure for even greater Federal involvement in
criminal matters traditionally handled by State and local
governments;
(6) the Federal courts especially have become overburdened
with criminal matters more properly handled by State and local
governments;
(7) a major impetus for this increased Federal role in
combating violent crime is the lack of effective tools with
which State and local governments can prosecute violent
criminal offenders;
(8) a more uniform, proportionate, and appropriately
punitive system of sentencing for violent criminal offenders
would serve both to reduce the incidence of violent crime and
to reduce the need for direct Federal involvement in criminal
matters traditionally handled by State and local governments;
(9) a more appropriate and effective role for the Federal
Government in the struggle against most violent crime is to
encourage each State to take the steps necessary to reduce
crime in such State which would also reduce the national crime
rate;
(10) the United States Sentencing Guidelines have proven to
be an effective means of achieving, at the Federal level, a
more uniform, proportionate, and appropriately punitive
criminal sentencing system; and
(11) each State should be required to analyze its criminal
sentencing system and to consider whether the adoption of a
revised sentencing system would enable it to combat violent
crime more effectively.
(b) Purposes.--The purposes of this Act are--
(1) to require each State to undertake a comprehensive
examination of the State's criminal sentencing scheme and to
create a sentencing system which more effectively governs the
sentencing of violent offenders; and
(2) to provide funds to States that comply with the
requirements of section 5(b) to implement necessary changes to
the State criminal sentencing system, including increasing the
capacity of State correctional facilities if necessary.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

For the purpose of this Act, the term ''State'' means any State of
the United States.

SEC. 4. STATE SENTENCING REVIEWS.

(a) In General.--Each State, in order to be eligible for funds
under this Act, must conduct a systematic review of its criminal
sentencing laws and practices.
(b) State Sentencing Reviews.--Not later than one year after the
date of enactment of this Act, the government of each State shall
submit to the Attorney General a report detailing the results of the
State's review of its criminal sentencing system. The report also shall
include the following:
(1) An analysis of the State statutory criminal sentencing
scheme, including information regarding murder (all degrees),
arson, burglary, assault, robbery, kidnapping, extortion, rape,
and child molestation. This analysis should include--
(A) the minimum and maximum sentence available for
each offense;
(B) the basis for distinguishing between different
degrees of the same offense;
(C) whether factors in addition to the actual crime
(such as criminal history, victim impact, or use of a
weapon) should be considered by the sentencing
authority; and
(D) whether probation or some other non-custodial
alternatives to incarceration are a sentencing option.
(2) An analysis of the sentences actually imposed by State
court judges for the crimes listed in paragraph (1).
(3) An analysis of the time which has actually been served
for the conviction of crimes listed in paragraph (1).
(4) An analysis of the practices and procedures of the
State relating to probation, parole, and other alternatives to
incarceration, with particular emphasis on crimes which have
been committed by convicted criminals while on parole or
probation or otherwise not incarcerated.
(5) An analysis of whether the State sentencing system
permits or requires the sentencing authority to order convicted
criminals to pay restitution to the victim, the victim's
family, or the State, and the percentage of restitution orders
which are actually collected.
(6) An analysis of whether and under what circumstances
State law permits the pretrial detention without bond of
dangerous offenders.
(7) An analysis of whether and under what circumstances
State law gives victims the right to be informed, present, and
heard at all critical stages of a case from arrest through
parole.
(8) An analysis of whether and how State law establishes
post conviction relief procedures which limit repetitive
challenges by convicted offenders.
(9) An analysis of State law regarding the application of
adult sentencing laws to juvenile offenders charged with the
crimes listed in section 4(b)(1) of this Act.
(10) An analysis of the State prison capacity and whether
court orders limit, or otherwise impact such capacity and
whether a lack of capacity impacts sentencing or release
decisions at the judicial or administrative level.

SEC. 5. STATE SENTENCING SYSTEMS.

(a) In General.--Each State, in order to comply with this Act, must
submit for approval a plan to the Attorney General that evaluates the
criminal sentencing system and, if necessary, creates a sentencing
system which complies with the requirements of subsection (b).
(b) State Sentencing System.--In addition to responding to the
reporting requirement of section 4(b) of this Act, the State, in a
subsequent report to the Attorney General, shall describe in detail any
changes in the State's criminal sentencing system designed to meet the
requirements of this Act. The elements of a sentencing system that the
States must have in order to be in compliance with this Act shall
include at least the following:
(1) State constitutional or statutory authority for
pretrial detention of dangerous criminals.
(2) Mandatory minimum prison sentences, which do not allow
probation or suspension of sentence, for violent offenders or
repeat offenders who--
(A) intentionally or knowingly inflict serious
physical injury;
(B) use or exhibit deadly weapons in the commission
of the crimes listed in section 4(b)(1) of this Act.
(C) commit violent or sexual offenses against
children; and
(D) commit sexual assault.
(3) Mandatory life sentence with no release for third or
subsequent conviction of violent crime.
(4) Truth in sentencing provisions which restrict parole,
good-time credit release for violent offenders, or other forms
of early release to not more than a total reduction of 15
percent of the sentence imposed.
(5) State constitutional or statutory provisions which
guarantee to victims the right to be informed, present, and
heard at all critical stages of the criminal case, and
provisions to ensure the collection, tracking, and enforcement
of restitution from the offender in all cases involving
economic loss to the victim.

SEC. 6. FUNDING AND COMPLIANCE.

(a) Funding.--There shall be available to carry out the purposes of
this Act, for fiscal year 1994, $1,000,000; for fiscal year 1995,
$1,500,000; for fiscal year 1996, $2,000,000; for fiscal year 1997,
$2,500,000; and for fiscal year 1998, $3,000,000; from amounts
appropriated for foreign operations during such fiscal years
(specifically from the amounts allocated for the Multilateral
Development Banks, the International Development Association, the
Agency for International Development, Public Law 83-480, and the
Export-Import Development Bank) and from amounts appropriated from
Federal land purchases and from amounts appropriated for trade
promotion activities and travel and tourism activities.
(b) Federal Share.--The Federal share of a grant made under this
Act may not exceed 50 percent of the total costs of the projects which
receive funds under this Act.
(c) Compliance.--Beginning 3 years after the date of enactment of
this Act, the Attorney General shall eliminate funding to a State that
does not comply with the requirements of this Act.
Student:
Violent and Repeat Offender Accountability Act of 1993 - Requires each State, to be eligible for funds under this Act, to conduct and report to the Attorney General on a systematic review of its criminal sentencing laws and practices, including analyses related to: (1) the State statutory criminal sentencing scheme; (2) sentences actually imposed for specified crimes; (3) time actually served; (4) practices and procedures relating to probation, parole, and other alternatives to incarceration; (5) restitution; (6) pretrial detention; (7) victims rights; (8) post-conviction relief procedures; (9) application of adult sentencing laws to juvenile offenders; and (10) prison capacity.
Directs each State to submit to the Attorney General for approval a plan that evaluates the criminal sentencing system and, if necessary, creates a sentencing system which provides for: (1) State constitutional or statutory authority for pretrial detention of dangerous criminals; (2) mandatory minimum prison sentences which do not allow probation or suspension of sentence, for certain violent or repeat offenders; (3) mandatory life sentence with no release for a third or subsequent conviction of a violent crime; (4) provisions which restrict parole, good-time credit release for violent offenders, or other early release to not more than a total reduction of 15 percent of the sentence imposed; and (5) State constitutional or statutory provisions which guarantee victims the right to be informed, present, and heard at all critical stages of the criminal case, and to ensure the collection, tracking, and enforcement of restitution from the offender in all cases involving economic loss to the victim.
Makes funds available for this Act from amounts appropriated for foreign operations, for trade promotion, travel, and tourism activities, and for Federal land purchases.
Limits the Federal share of grants made under this Act to 50 percent of total project costs.