IN: This is an email
Roland and David I am attaching the Enron response to your RFP of October 4, 2001. This proposal is indicative and confidential. We would be most pleased to discuss this proposal or other approaches/modifications with you. thank you

What is the subject?

OUT: Indicative Enron Proposal for Wallingford

IN: This is an email
Just wanted to give you an update on my progress so far - I'm changing these deals in between each of my other daily tasks, and I'm also having a hard time reading some of the deal numbers. I've made it through the first page and a bit of the second. I've changed all but four of the deals to "no confirm." Here are the questions I have on those deals: 1. 552516 - why are we not confirming a City of Riverside deal? Should I ask Jeff? 2. 553037 - looks like it's already "no confirm" 3. 553666/667/668 - are we not confirming any deals where PGE is the counterparty? I thought it was just where PGE System was the delivery point? 4. 553926 - this deal is killed. Do we have to change settings on killed deals as well? Also, if you have a slightly bigger copy of the document you faxed over, or if you could e-mail it to me, that would save me a lot of guessing time. Thanks for your help!

What is the subject?

OUT: Deal Changes - No confirm

IN: This is an email
Rick, I read your memo regarding Global Risk Management Initiative. I am sending you the information regarding a related initiative on which I have been working last year and which is moving now into the implementation stage. It's Enterprise - Wide Risk Management and it's really an effort to measure business risks consistently across the company. I hope my group can be helpful in designing the general approach to this problem. Please, let me know what your thoughts are. Vince

What is the subject?

OUT:
Global Risk Management Initiative