In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[Q]: Comment: Many adults are naive and stupid too...that's why Trumps has millions of supporters. From Trumps own mouth "I love the poorly educated", what a role model from America.
[A]: Insult

[Q]: Comment: Dean, does your head hurt when you think up stupid s_____ like that?
[A]: Insult

[Q]: Comment: Cheating just points out that school discipline is quite separate from criminal prosecution. I trust you understand a) Title IX requires the school to, in a timely fashion, launch their own investigation and b) the standards for judging the actions are those at the civil court level "preponderance of evidence", rather than the criminal prosecution level of guilty " without a reasonable doubt." I think O.J. could support that these are very different requirements. In my post, I specifically reference that many of these alleged rapes and sexual assualts involve "date" or "acquaintance" actions. There are seldom wittnesses (not a big surprise). The "rape kits" are usually irrelevant since the defense is almost always "yes, we had sex....but it was consensual." You need to remember the schools have NO CHOICE but to launch a "genuine" investigation of their own. It's required by Title IX. Your final sentence "....matter for the justice system, not academic institutions" is not true.
[A]:
Non-insult