Question: Sentence A: It could easily be seen by ships in the Firth of Forth and was a useful safeguard if prevailing winds carried the sound of the gunfire the wrong way.

Sentence B: The ships could never hear the gunfire.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: According to the survey, most employers with business travelers allowed their workers to keep frequent flyer miles received on business travel for their own use.
Employers refused to give their employees the frequent flyer miles.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
The simple columned structure marking the spot where Theresa fled as a youngster already consumed with religious visions is secondary to the location.

Here is a hypothesis:
Religious visions made Theresa run to Tibet.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: That was the only reason the Kentuckian could think of.

Sentence 2: The Kentuckian man could only think of one reason and that was poverty.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
It's hedonistic and funky, and tolerant of alternative lifestyles.

Does it follow that "It's tolerant of all lifestyles."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "How is he named, senor ?" ", can we conclude that "What is his name, sir?"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes