Problem: Here is a premise:
The first question to Bauer Wednesday was, Don't you just give this story more momentum by doing this?

Here is a hypothesis:
Unbelievably, no one questioned Bauer about the story on Wednesday.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: NONEXCHANGE TRANSACTION - A transaction that arises when one party to a transaction receives value without giving or promising value in return or one party to a transaction gives or promises value without receiving value in return.

Sentence 2: A nonexchange transaction is when one party gets something without giving something of the same value in return.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
The last time the sergeant had woken up was in 1976, when his father was caught in-flagrante with a policewoman from the station in Gizajno, where they had lived at the time.

Does it follow that "The sergeant's father loved the policewoman."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If A little farther along the passage on the left was a second door., can we say that "The door on the left was locked."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"And, Helburn and Morris point out, since tax credits can be used for any kind of care the parents choose--and parents being the way they are--tax breaks are not good tools for ensuring good quality."
Hypothesis: Morris and Helburn noted that tax breaks are not always synonymous with excellent quality.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: They're not good or evil, they are just mindless slaves to instinct and the food chain.

Sentence 2: Jellyfish do no good and cause no harm; they are merely a part of the food chain.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell