John and Krishna, I am sending you an outline of a conference at Stanford on topics related to demand-side pricing and management in the power markets. Please, let me know if you are personally interested and who else in your respective organizations would like to attend. Vince
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: RTP project
Jeff, As you know, you are going to be the keynote speaker at this year YPO Regional Conference next September. The organizers are asking us if you will be willing to participate in a "breakout" session right after your speech. The session would be 1 hour 15 minutes long and only a fraction of the 130 couples would participate. Since the topics being presented at the same time are more family oriented ( The Aspen Contemporary Museum of Art, mother- daughter relationships, wealth and family business), Bill and I thought that if you decide to go ahead with this session, you would probably like to talk about a business topic form a personal perspective like how to become a CEO or the characteristics of a leader. In my opinion, we will not get much extra from this additional session, but since you are involved with the organization, I wanted to check with you before saying that you were not available for an additional session. Please, let me know if you want to participate and what topic would you like to talk about. Regards,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: YPO Regional Conference - Additional session
John: Do you need Accumap day one? Carmen said that it had not been renewed so do you have access to it now? If you do need an account how many and for who? thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: IHS Accumap
We are nearing the "final" form of the document for further use. I have asked Bradford to speak with you regarding use of it for major trading counterparties that may not be investment grade, but with whom Credit sees the ability to greatly enhance our liquidity via netting of margin requirements (not the small accounts). Two issues. 1. Do you think we should write a risk memo concerning the issues surrounding the ultimate effectiveness under the Code and "square setoff" rights? Basically, the intent would be to clarify that if a court did not enforce the close-out netting, and then did not enforce the square setoff, our collateral position on a trading master by trading master basis could be underwater because we would have netted the positions under the master netting agreement for margining purposes. Further to this, the bankruptcy reform aspects of this issue are not moving as previously hoped due to consumer issues and current events. 2. FYI: It has come to my attention this week that Global Finance has consummated a receivable financing, and desires to consummate additional such financings which conflict with master netting agreements in place (as well as setoff language in trading contracts) and with the general concept of master netting for the future. We are meeting tomorrow with Bradford and Global Finance representatives to gather facts, sort through the issues, and try to resolve what appear to be different objectives concerning trading receivables. From a cash perspective, I would think Enron as whole would get more benefit from master netting (dollar for dollar benefit) than loan security (which would never be a dollar for dollar benefit)--do you think this is a correct analysis?
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Master Netting Agreement: Update, Issues, Questions