Question: Sentence A: The Straits Settlements were formed after the Anglo-Dutch Treaty of London (1824).

Sentence B: English and Dutch negotiators could not reach an agreement and the treaty was abandoned.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Fashion now seems like a club with a private jargon that leaves no room for the play of sensitive literary exposition.
Fashion now seems like an exclusive club.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Cowardy-cat.

Here is a hypothesis:
Brave dog.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: i'm not sure that there is a solution to that as far as uh the day there you know everybody has in their mind the kind of day care that they want but it seems you know that there's not really the perfect one out there

Sentence 2: Some might share the same ideas about what would constitute an acceptable day care.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
'All right.

Does it follow that "He responded in agreement with what I had just said."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "The first of these is political experience, of which Bush has little and Forbes has almost none.", can we conclude that "Bush does not have much political experience."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes