input question: Mr. Casellas began his career at the Philadelphia law firm Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and Rhoads, where he worked for sixteen years. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Mr. Casellas worked at Montgomery, McCracken, Walker and Rhoads for sixteen years."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "The agencies subsequently used these expectations as the basis of senior executives' performance appraisals.", can we conclude that "The agencies used these expectations and others to evaluate executives."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Exactly--and while we're at it, Maslin is only a critic who asks for too little.

Sentence B: Maslin's standards are too high.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: The agency must also control changes to the contract and accept or reject contract deliverables.
The agency does not have any responsibilities.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
The final rule was determined to be an economically significant regulatory action under Executive Order

Here is a hypothesis:
The final rule was economically significant and was impressive reading for students.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
They may not realize their complicity in a movement that seems likely ultimately to take such freedom away.

Does it follow that "They are not aware of the freedoms that may be taken away."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes