[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A woman in a red shirt sitting with two young girls in dresses."
Hypothesis: "A woman is wearing a red shirt."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A woman being in a red shirt implies she is wearing the shirt.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "Two white men drinking beer out of guinness glasses." can we conclude that "Two white men drink imported beers."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Just because drinking out of Guinness glasses does not mean it is imported beers.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A group of firemen move about in a restricted area." can we conclude that "Firemen gather."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Gathering and moving about in a restricted area are the same thing.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A quad sends dirt flying into the air." is it true that "The four wheeler is stuck in the dirt."?
I THE FOUR WHEELER MAY NOT BE STUCK IN THE DIRT JUST BECAUSE IT IS SENDING DIRT FLYING IN THE AIR.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "Three men with reflectors on their clothing are searching in the field." can we conclude that "A few men are outdoors."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: If three men are searching in a field then they are outdoors.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A male dressed in blue is carrying things in both hands."
Hypothesis: "A man in coveralls is carrying buckets of water out to the stable."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A male dressed in blue is not necessarily wearing coveralls. A male carrying things in both hands is not necessarily carrying buckets of water. A male carrying things in both hands is not necessarily carrying those things out to the stable.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.