In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: and it seems like uh um we're catching all their residue i'm not sure if it's kerosene or what that's dropping but other than that you know we don't have the unless we're catching it from the midwest the emissions yeah from the power plants Choices: 1. The residue could be kerosene or it could be something else entirely. 2. Power plants emit a lot of residue that we end up catching. 3. I'm sure that the residue coming from the power plants is safe.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: In contrast with the existing Section 411, which imposes a full financial penalty starting immediately after the deadline for holding allowances covering emissions, Section 406 imposes a financial penalty that is graduated, with the penalty increasing the longer the period before the excess emissions are offset and the financial penalty is paid. Choices: 1. Section 411 and Section 406 are virtually identical. 2. Section 411 and Section 406 were drafted within the same year. 3. Section 411 deals with financial penalties related to allowances covering emissions.
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: The above changes would allow substantial reductions in the complexity of rates and in the complexity of the data systems, which in turn would allow improvements in the costs and volumes for the subclasses that remained. Choices: 1. Reduction of rate complexity will be achieved. 2. The above changes will not allow reductions in complexity of rates and data systems. 3. As per the changes above, substantial reductions in the complexity of rates and data systems will be possible.
Example Output:
2