QUESTION: Ken - Although I cannot pretend to feel the pressure you have felt over the past year, I do appreciate your interest in the employees as expressed in the current decision regarding the Change of Control Provision. In light of the current circumstances, it is an honorable action. I wouldn't be here (4 yrs; as an Analyst, then and currently an Associate) if I didn't believe in Enron and would have left long ago. Enron has had a profound impact in more than the energy sector, and will continue regardless of Enron's form, simply based on its historical innovation. To have our health and have had the opportunity to do what Enron has done is astonishing, especially these days. I wish you the best in time ahead. Be well, Ilan
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Change of Control Provisions
Dear Mr. Kvetinskas, Per the instructions of Julie Gomez, I am forwarding you a marked version of the above referenced LOI containing the changes that Ms. Gomez discussed with you this afternoon. Please feel free to call me at 713-853-7238 with any questions regarding the attached. Steve Van Hooser
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: ENA's suggested revisions to SSI's Draft of 11:54 today.
Attached please find referenced list. A few notes: No physical power or credit derivatives for any of these Japanese counterparties. Re: Bandwidth, as a general principle, what I'm hearing from the bandwidth lawyers is (1) for Japanese counterparties they can only trade the U.S. segment (which is currently the only segment we have online), and (2) for right now, we have 1 Netherlands and 2 German counterparties on the list, and they are still checking to get the scoop on those countries, so for right now I am shutting them down for bandwidth.
Answer: Japanese Counterparty Approvals
Here is an email: All, We are currently working on the data model for the Trading Agreements System and have a question pertaining to internal/external counterparties. Are all agreements between an internal company(counterparty) and an external company(counterparty)? I spoke with Meredith Stewart (the data architect for this project) and she found an agreement between 2 internal counterparties, e.g. Enron Louisiana and ECT. Please let me know ASAP. Thanks,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Counterparties
Q: Darron, Here's the detail we discussed. Let me know if you have any questions. The tabs labeled NSS1 Deals Killed and NSS2 Deals Killed are the PGL deals that were killed. The sitara deals to book the 12 Bcf were 1194383, 1194384, 1194385, and 1194386. Let me know if you have any questions. Robin
Propose a subject line
A: NSS Detail
Here is an email: I have rolled or input the following deals for October. Crosstex 138553 2 Duke 418429 139 Hesco 394798 500 Swift 418431 322 Tri-Union 418432 700 Vintage 403367 300 Whiteoak 418434 96 Whiting 418436 100 So, I am showing that the only deals we have outstanding for Oct are: Camden/9858 3000 Heatherlock/6879 544 (previous deal#133010) North Central/5228 3000 Julie - Please check these deals for the correct contract/terms. Also, please look into Heatherlock. Vance is noming gas for this deal. However, the deal ticket does not have an evergreen flag. When I tried to roll another month, I got a message that another contract was needed. Thanks.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
October Wellhead