Question: Sentence A: It referred to the mysterious man found dead in New York.

Sentence B: The strange male found tied up and deceased in Brooklyn, New York is what it specified.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: and that that that's the way it would be you know it's like
There is no definitive way things should be.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
um-hum would uh would you be more in favor of uh you know like a local uh my only experience with it i was in Central America for a while and uh in San Salvador in El Salvador for instance everybody had what they called there social year

Here is a hypothesis:
I was never in central america.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Though it lacked the size of the uninhabitable hydrogen-ammonia planets and its low density made its surface gravity fairly normal, its gravitational forces fell off but slowly with distance.

Sentence 2: It was smaller than other planets but had typical gravity.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
i'm not sure that there is a solution to that as far as uh the day there you know everybody has in their mind the kind of day care that they want but it seems you know that there's not really the perfect one out there

Does it follow that "Everyone agrees on the solution to creating the perfect day care."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "When the evidence is more consistent than not, the analyst confirms the pattern and looks for others related to it.", can we conclude that "When the evidence is consistent, the analyst still cannot confirm the pattern."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no