The fact that a security guard is standing next to a museum sculpture doesn't imply the guard takes their job seriously.
The question and answer are below.
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A security guard standing next to a sculpture in a museum."
Hypothesis: "The guard takes their job seriously."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell
Identically dressed girls don't have to be twins. Being late for supper is not the only possible explanation for someone to climb a fence. Taking a short cut may not be the motivation for someone to climb a fence. People climbing a fence need not be headed home.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "Two identically dressed girls climbing a fence." can we conclude that "The twins are late for supper as they try to take a short cut home over the fence."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
A collie cannot be jumping and eating at the same time.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A collie jumps over a hurdle."
Hypothesis: "A collie is eating his dinner in his doghouse."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
It mentions that the man is alone but doesnt say that he is happy to be alone.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "A lone fisherman casts off a rock with a city visible across the water." that "A lone fisherman is happy to be alone."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell
Standing between two rows of blue seats is a way of being next to blue seats.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A little boy is holding a skinny baseball bat while standing between two rows of blue seats."
Hypothesis: "A boy is next to blue seats."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
yes
You can not be on top and beneath the water at the same time.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man glides on top of the water."
Hypothesis: "A man scuba dives deep beneath the water."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no