Detailed Instructions: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
Q: Comment: Someone wrote that the same people arguing that these girls should have to more effectively cover their midsections are the same people arguing that it is ok for young girls to have to put on a hijab.

I dunno.

In the first place, the hijab argument does not fit with the ten year old girl. Pre-pubescent girls are not required to cover their hair in most Muslim traditions.

But in the second place, is there really no difference between, on the one hand, seeing a seventeen year old with hair reaching from her forehead to her shoulders, and, on the other hand, seeing a seventeen year old's backside who is wearing thong undies under thin sheer leggings?

I have a sneaking suspicion that, if you did a poll of all Canadian mothers, more would be comfortable with seated middle-aged men admiring their teen daughter's hair than with seated middle-aged men admiring their teen daughter's thong-and-legging veneered backsides.

Does that mean all those moms are just sexist and narrow-minded?
A:
Sexual-explicit