Given the Question and Answer pair, detect whether the answer is acceptable or not. Denote acceptable answer as "yes", otherwise denote as "no". An acceptable answer is consistent with the context in question, detailed, long, and uses general knowledge of English. Answers that are not definite and suggest a variety of options are not acceptable answers.

[EX Q]: Question: I debated with my peers that we can use the word emails when referring to more than one and it would be grammatically right. But most of them said since we don't say we received mails today, similarly we won't say we received emails . Quick advice please.
Answer: Dan Bron's comment (above) that e-mail/email at its inception was treated as a mass noun is correctand so is Kristina Lopez's comment (above) that e-mail/email is widely applied today not just to the medium of electronic mail but to individual messages sent and received in that medium. For many years the technology magazines where I worked enforced a strict house rule: e-mail (and later email) referred to "electronic mail" as a mode of communication, and individual messages had to be termed "e-mail [or email] messages." But three or four years ago, the overwhelming weight of popular usage prevailed, and we began to accept the use of email as a singular noun that could take an indefinite article, and emails as a plural nounboth referring to individual messages. It is probably not coincidental that other forms of electronic communication receive similar treatment in popular (and some publishing) usage: a text and texts for "a text message" and "text messages," respectively; and an IM and IMs for "an instant messaging message" and "instant messaging messages" (as I recall, people used to avoid "instant messaging message" by conflating the technology with the individual message to produce "instant message"). At publishing houses, the proper handling of "an e-mail [or email]" versus "an e-mail [or email] message" remains a house style issuethere is no universally agreed-upon preference. If you are beholden to no one's style guide, you are free to use the wording that you like better. But the overall tendency, I believe, is toward accepting an email and emails as collapsed forms of "an electronic mail message" and "electronic mail messages.".
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Question: I am trying to find a single word antonym for "exceed". I am using the word as a verb (so "beneath" doesn't work) and it should have a positive connotation (as in a golf score which falls below par). I thought of "subceed", which I like, and found a few Google hits but it doesn't show up in any reputable dictionaries. I've reviewed answers to similar questions and found no suitable alternatives. For example, the selected answer to What would be an appropriate opposite of "exceed"? suggested: "eluded" has a mostly negative connotation and implies intention "beneath" is not a verb "are below"/"did not meet" phrases I'm looking to replace "exceeded" in the following quotes with a single word (meaning something like "went below", "were under", etc.): "He never gets tickets because he always exceeds the speed limit." "To win the match, Tiger Woods must exceeded 4 strokes on the twelth hole." "To prevent freezing, do not exceed -20 degrees centigrade."
Answer: I'd go for: You underrun the speed limit.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Question: A simple question that has sparked some debate, and I couldn't find a concrete answer anywhere. There seems to be two camps: The word plethora indicates plural, so therefore it should be "There are a plethora"; and the other camp says that there is only one plethora (which contains multiple), so it should be "There is a plethora". I've seen many examples of both. Is there a consensus, or is it just one of those things that can go either way?
Answer: There IS A whole bunch of reasons why you need to pay attention to encapsulation and collectives. There is a {ton of bananas} in the truck. There is a {whole ton of bananas} in the truck. There is a {bag of cloves} that I bought. There is a {box of cigarettes}. This is a {list of people} I am inviting. There is a {collection of artwork of various genres} in the warehouse. It is three days' {work} to finish painting the house. We have to look at he complex noun phrase as a whole. This is the super noun encapsulation. If there is only one collection, then there is only one collection. Regardless if there are many members in that singular collection. There is {singular complex noun}. There are {plural complex noun}. The following is a plural noun phrase encapsulated by a singular noun phrase: There IS my {having to deal with two hundred people who ARE attending the party} that IS giving me a headache. If we address the singular collection, we have to look at that collection as the singularised entity. If we wish to address the items (of the singular collective) in plural, we have to get rid of the collective encapsulation: There is a whole lot of people feeling depressed about the Patriots' failure to reach the Super Bowl. There is a lot of people feeling depressed about the Patriots' failure to reach the Super Bowl. There are lots of people feeling depressed about the Patriots' failure to reach the Super Bowl. There are many people feeling depressed about the Patriots' failure to reach the Super Bowl. Contractor: How many boxes of framing nails did you buy? Peon: I bought only one box. Angry Contractor: Do you mean to say there IS only ONE box of framing nails? Unrepentant Peon: There are plenty nails in a box Angry Contractor: There is also one whole load of studs to frame. There are another two loads coming in.
[EX A]:
no