Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
This kind of thinking is why the 30 year old Saudi Prince glutted the oil market, they knew fools would bankrupt oil producers so Saudi can control the oil market they have!

Stop attacking the money men like musselman who helps keep Alaska alive, look at the last lease sales on the North Slope, if it was not for Caelus and Armstrong Alaska would be in real bad shape, the majors would have to shut down the trans Alaska pipeline.

Ex Output:
No

Ex Input:
Of course the author ignores the mcdowell decision<1989> which proclaimed any rural priority as illegal under state constitution. They want disciminatory rules which give them the right to shoot whatever they want whenever they want. And everybody else gets to stay out. What a load of unequal protection crap.

Ex Output:
Yes

Ex Input:
What legal precedent requires a duly tried and convicted defendant to pay for "upgrades" as part of their restitution? I knew this would turn into a blank check boondoggle. Government always decides to give itself endless free money.

Ex Output:
No