Problem: Here is a premise:
Does this distinction matter?

Here is a hypothesis:
Does the difference matter?

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Suddenly he caught my wrist, and began twisting it.

Sentence 2: He twisted his own wrist.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
The risk is that the shift in market psychology might not be subtle, and the deflation might not be gradual.

Does it follow that "The risk is that the change in market psychology might be significant."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If When you talk to euro enthusiasts, they invariably claim that one of the great benefits of the new currency will be price transparency., can we say that "Euro enthusiasts claim that euro implies more richness."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"Tuesday, Bush tried to steer his campaign back to the right."
Hypothesis: He tried to get his movement where he wanted it to be.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: But after taking a hard look at its performance, FEMA concluded that it could better fulfill its mission by addressing the range of activities available before, during, and after disaster strikes.

Sentence 2: FEMA reevaluated how they perform during a natural disaster.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell