Given a paragraph, generate a claim that is supported by the given paragraph. 1) The claim must contain information from within the paragraph. 2) A sentence within the paragraph can be used as a claim. 3) The claim should not have contradictions within the paragraph. 4) The claim should be at most one sentence long.

Let me give you an example: "Although the story didn't cite the cost of appendectomy emergency or urgent surgery and we wish it had, we nonetheless will give it a satisfactory score because it at least cited what the editorial writer wrote, ""A secondary benefit is the savings to the hospital generated by minimizing staff and anesthesiologist presence late in the evening and during the wee hours of the morning."" As with our harms score above, although the story didn't give absolute numbers, in this case we think it was sufficient for it to report that ""The scientists found no significant difference among the groups in the patients' condition 30 days after surgery or in the length of their operation or hospital stay."" Although the story didn't give absolute numbers, in this case we think it was sufficient for it to report that ""The scientists found no significant difference among the groups in the patients' condition 30 days after surgery or in the length of their operation or hospital stay."" Despite running less than 300 words, this story did an adequate job in explaining the quality of the evidence, including pointing out limitations. No disease-mongering here. The story meets the bare minimum requirement for this criterion in that it at least cited what an editorial stated. The focus of the story was on a study comparing emergency appendectomy with surgery done up to 12 hours later or beyond. This is the whole focus of the story and one we applaud when it begins: ""Appendectomy is the most common emergency surgery in the world, but it doesn't have to be."" There were no claims made about the novelty of this research, and we may have wished for a bit more context on this. Nonetheless, the potential for guiding future care decisions was made clear. Not applicable. Given that the story only pulled excerpts from the journal article and the accompanying editorial, and didn't include any fresh quotes from interviews, we can't be sure of the extent to which it may have been influenced by a news release."
The answer to this example can be: Some appendicitis cases may not require 'emergency' surgery
Here is why: The paragraph mentions that "Appendectomy is the most common emergency surgery in the world, but it doesn't have to be." which is considered evidence for the output. Thus, the output is a valid claim.

OK. solve this:
The story includes some pricing estimates for these products. The story is clear that despite the claims made by some who stand to profit there is no quantifiable information about benefits documented about these products. And there's this closing skepticism from Dr. Lewy: "he was not sure that their other purportedly sleep-inducing ingredients like valerian root work and partly because food delays rather than hastens the absorption of melatonin." The story explains that dessert makers "are marketing their products as a harmless way to promote relaxation." While harms are not quantified, it's clear from the story's discussions about regulatory questions why that's impossible to do right now. The harms mentioned are largely hypothetical in that there isn't good evidence documenting these problems. But the story does a good job in painting, with broad strokes, what might go wrong if one uses these products. The story shows how evidence is elusive, partially due to the lack of regulatory clarity about the products in question. No disease-mongering in this story. Several independent experts independent of the product manufacturers were quoted. Not applicable. It isn't possible to compare existing alternatives to these products because there is no information documenting efficacy of the products. The widening availability of these products is eminently clear from the story. And the fact that melatonin has not approved by the FDA as a food additive is explained. The relative novelty of these products and their spread is clear from the story. It's clear that the story did NOTrely on a news release.
Answer:
Dessert, Laid-Back and Legal