Instructions: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Input: 971 F.2d at 6. "A contested collection proceeding will end in a judgment or a series of judgments granting supplementary relief to the plaintiff. The judgment that concludes the collection pro ceeding is the judgment from which the defendant can appeal." Id. Thus, if the government discovered an asset from defendants' disclosures on which it could bring a further judicial collection action, defendants could appeal from the interlocutory discovery order once judgment was entered regarding that particular asset. See id. In the alternative, defendants could refuse to comply with the discovery order, and if the district court entered a contempt sanction, that sanction would be immediately appealable. See Consumers Gas & Oil, Inc. v. Farmland Indus., Inc., 84 F.3d 367, 370 (10th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>); Cent. States, 971 F.2d at 6; Fabric Garment
Holding statements: (A) holding that a postjudgment contempt sanction for refusal to obey orders whether it is characterized as a civil or a criminal sanction is immediately appealable as a final order under 1291 (B) holding that remand orders are also appealable orders under 28 usc 1291 (C) holding that a trustee can recover damages in the form of costs and attorneys fees under section 105a as a sanction for ordinary civil contempt (D) holding an order of rule 37a sanctions against an attorney is immediately appealable under 1291 (E) holding that monetary sanction was not supportable as a compensatory civil contempt sanction because there was no proof of the amount of loss
Output:
holding that remand orders are also appealable orders under 28 usc 1291