Q: Premise: "A construction worker inspecting part of a wooden structure."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A worker is replacing part of a wooden structure." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: Inspecting and replacing are two very different actions. Not all inspectors will replace parts of a structure.

Q: If "A young child plows snow manually." does that mean that "A child is wearing snow pants."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: A young child plows snow manually is not necessarily wearing snow pants.

Q: If "A surfer is paddling on a board through the ocean." does that mean that "A surfer paddles through the pacific ocean."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: A surfer is paddling on a board through the ocean does not necessary that surfer through the pacific ocean.

Q: Given the sentence "Two female traffic police officers peer down a cobble-stoned street." can we conclude that "The female officers change after work."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: no
Chain-of-thought:
Police officers who peer down a cobble-stoned street can't be changing after work at the same moment.