Question: Sentence A: uh i mean that's sort of the overall the meta the meta change as it were uh where that woman really have more of a choice now about what they do

Sentence B: There are not choices for women.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Since the rule does not impose a federal intergovernmental or private sector mandate, as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, sections 202, 204 and 205 of the act are inapplicable.
Certain sections of the act are not applicable.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
And if technically cilantro is neither fruit nor vegetable, that's the least of my classification problems.

Here is a hypothesis:
I have classification problems with the fruits and vegetables.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: It Was a Simple Error

Sentence 2: A mistake was made.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Countries can compare experiences, seek answers to common problems, and work to coordinate domestic and international policies.

Does it follow that "Countries can never work together at all. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "For example, a couple could contribute up to $2,000 annually.", can we conclude that "A married couple would only put in $500 per year."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no