IN: We are in the process of filing our annual hedge exemptions with the NYMEX for 1999. In connection therewith, I will need to provide the NYMEX with an updated copy of the alphabetical list of Enron Corp. and Subsidiary Companies. My last list was dated June 8, 1998. Thanks Kate, as usual, for your help!

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Enron Corp. and Subsidiary List
IN: This is an email
hi there: how are you doing? have you told the company anything yet? i am thinking you probably had to turn ole pattie down... was she devestated that you won't be her new BFF? let me know how it went, and i hope things are going well on the whole "looking for a job" front. I know it can be so frustrating. have you spoken with matt???? any more updates with that? happy valentines (even though it is a dumb holiday) Take care bonnie

What is the subject?

OUT: seattle
QUESTION: Attached is the First Amendment to License Agreement which extends the term of the contract to March 31, 2001. My understanding is that you will be sending it directly to FT. Once they have signed off on the form, let me know and I will get Mark Greenberg to initial it and get it signed by an officer of EnronOnline. Call me at x33399 if you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Financial Times Energy Amendment
We're getting a lot of inquiries about Enron's role in California's de-reg history, with a lot of misinformation arising out of Peace's handywork. I spent about 3 hours on Friday with a Sac Bee reporter (Dale Kasler). He'll be interviewing Skilling on the same topic in a week or so, and he'd like to talk to Steve, too. Sue spent time with a NYT reporter discussing the same. Some common themes are arising in the questions. Thought it would be a good idea to spend 30 minutes discussing those themes and developing our messages to ensure consistency. If folks think it would be useful, is there a time this week that we could squeeze in 30 minutes? Thanks. Best,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Messages Regarding Recent Interest in the History of De-regulation In California
I want to document my appreciation for your efforts and attitude during this incident. You showed compassion and moved quickly to resolve the issue. There was no hesitation on April's part to make loans to Jenny and me. Compensatory efforts have resulted in April taking Jenny and me to lunch, Amy initiating and funding another lunch for us and Dave Parquet mandating us four hours pay for waiting at home on a Saturday to recieve replacement checks via Fedex that turned out to be non-negotiable. I have cc'd Jeff Skilling because I believe he needs to know that he has very efficient and compassionate people working for Enron. April, Amy and Cristina, thank you for being yourselves.
Answer: Paycheck Fiasco
Q: Per our conversation, it appears that the two companies are going to merge in October? Looking at Lotus Notes, I don't think we could pick two bigger dogs of masters to have in place. I don't think we want either master to be the survivor master. With Chase we have an old 1987 Interest Rate and Currency Exchange Agreement and with Morgan we have a Master Energy Price Swap Agreement. Yuk, yuk. If I had my druthers I say, LET'S START OVER. I know it's far reaching, but maybe we could make it our goal to have this master replaced by October. Do you think that's do-able? Do we have a contact at Chase/Morgan we can start dealing with? I'm going to add chase to the Legal/Credit list just as a tickler for us to get this thing rolling.
Propose a subject line
A:
Chase Manhattan/Morgan Guaranty Merger