In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: Hahahaha. Now tell us PC spokesperson pretty please, did Ms. Ambrose make the calls to the ethics people after Trudeau's vacation event became public and and turned into a cheap political play? She would have to be awfully dumb if she did not. In addition to the hypocrisy the layer of parsing non existent differences is boggling.
Non-threat

Comment: yeah, he is an idiot
Non-threat

Comment: So at the of end of the official hearing, the teacher blurted out "It was probably one of the most professional things that I did, actually", and stormed out of the room?

Am I understanding this correctly?

If so, wow, is there ever a canyon between the real world of real jobs and what must surely be a public school world of coddled snowflake teachers.

Perhaps this is an opportunity to dispel the understandable perception of readers, that there is "a public school world of coddled snowflake teachers", you know, to dispel that perception by immediately firing the teacher in question and yanking his teacher's license?
Non-threat