Problem: (CNN) -- An extensive internal review of the debacle at Penn State that left a child sex abuser in place on campus for years forever casts a shadow over a heroic figure at the school: Joe Paterno.

The report, the result of months of investigation, finds Paterno and a few other top officials not only showed a "callous and shocking disregard for child victims," but also helped "empower" assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky to attract victims, according to former FBI Director Louis Freeh, who spearheaded the review.

Review at Penn State: 'Total disgard' for the victims

Allegations have swirled around Paterno, the legendary head football coach who led Penn State to national prominence, since the scandal broke last year. Still, the official independent review deals a heavy blow to those who love college football and idolize Paterno.

Penn State trustee Kenneth Frazier, head of the committee addressing the Sandusky scandal, said it was clear that Paterno and other key university leaders exhibited "inexcusable failures" when it came to protecting children.

But, Frazier said, figuring the coach's legacy will be a bit more complicated.

Paterno defended Penn State in letter before his death

"There is a lot about his life that's worth emulating," he said. "You have to measure every human by the good they've done, the bad they've done. I don't think any of us wants to be measured by the worst things we've ever been done in our life."

Following the report's release Thursday, many people took to social media to condemn the aura of support that has long surrounded Paterno -- and the students who rioted in November after he was fired.
1. Who was Paterno?
2. Where?
3. Was he good at it?
4. Does he now have allegations against him?
5. of what?
6. What kind of abuse did he inflict?
7. Who was Jerry Sandusky?
8. Did he have victims?
9. Who are they saying helped him?
10. Where did all this happen?
11. Is Paterno alive?
12. What did he write before he passed?
13. What did he do in the letter?
14. What does he say people should be measured by?
15. The good and the bad?
16. How does he think no one wants to be measured?
17. When was a report put out?
18. When was there a riot?
19. Why?
20. Who rioted?
Answer: 1. a head football coach
2. Penn State
3. yes
4. yes
5. being a child abuser
6. sex abuse
7. an assistant football coach
8. yes
9. Paterno and top officials
10. Penn State
11. no
12. a letter
13. Penn State
14. things they've done
15. yes
16. by the worst things we've done
17. Thursday
18. in November
19. Paterno was fired
20. students

Problem: CHAPTER VI.

TWO STRANGE MEETINGS.

"Mrs. Hugh Holker, at home, Saturday, May 29th, 3 to 6.30. Chetwood Court; tennis."

Cyril Waring read it out with a little thrill of triumph. To be sure, it was by no means certain that Elma would be there; but still, Chetwood Court was well within range of Tilgate town, and Montague Nevitt felt convinced, he said, the Holkers were friends of the Cliffords and the Kelmscotts.

"For my part," Guy remarked, balancing a fragment of fried sole on his fork as he spoke, "I'm not going all that way down to Chetwood merely to swell Mrs. Holker's triumph."

"I wouldn't if I were you," Cyril answered, with quiet incisiveness. He hadn't exactly fallen in love with Elma at first sight, but he was very much interested in her, and it struck him at once that what interested him was likely also to interest his twin brother. And this is just one of those rare cases in life where a man prefers that his interest in a subject should not be shared by any other person.

Before Saturday, the 29th, arrived, however, Guy had so far changed his mind in the matter, that he presented himself duly with Nevitt at Waterloo to catch the same train to Chetwood station that Cyril went down by.

"After all," he said to Nevitt, as they walked together from the club in Piccadilly, "I may as well see what the girl's like, anyhow. If she's got to be my sister-in-law--which seems not unlikely now--I'd better have a look at her beforehand, so to speak, on approbation."
1. What was close to Tilgate?
2. Who received the invitation there?
3. Who did he hope would be there?
4. Did he love her?
5. what was he then?
6. Was anyone else perhaps also?
7. who?
8. Was his brother intending to go?
9. Did he end up going?
10. Where did he meet Nevitt?
11. How did the intend to travel?
12. What is the date they are going?
13. What day of the week?
14. is there a specific time?
15. what is it?
16. Why did Guy decide to go?
17. Why would he want to do that?
18. Was Cyril happy to be invited?
19. What did Guy have on his fork?
20. Did Cyril want his brother to know he was interested in Elma?
Answer:
1. Chetwood Court
2. Cyril Waring
3. Elma
4. no
5. he was interested in her
6. yes
7. his twin brother
8. no
9. yes
10. at Waterloo
11. via train
12. May 29th
13. Saturday
14. yes
15. 3 to 6.30
16. To see what Elma is like.
17. She might become his sister in law.
18. yes
19. fried sole
20. no