In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: The political stupidity is not just limited to the narrow minded right! So if and when pot is allowed to be purchased will the people who have set the rules still buy their weed from their illegal dealer? The committee that was selected to come up with these recommendation have obviously never grown a single plant of marijuana before. They obviously do not at this time use marijuana, and quite likely never did! I cannot believe that our government is so naive to suggest that I will be able to grow 4 marijuana plants, but I will only be able to legally possess 30 grams at one time but I can grow for marijuana plants that can only produce up 30 grams of cured consumable is absolutely ridiculous. No one with any real subject intelligence would make such a ridiculous recommendation. Trudeau you have taken what should be a relatively simple transition and instead of listening to the needs of the consumer you have to tried to please the non users.
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: Good point, any theocratic philosophy is a threat to constitutional democracy. Canada had a blasphemy law.

Violent theocrats are much worse - regardless of their religion.

I only meant to say that The Premier was probably referring to violent Muslim theocrats which is essentially what an Islamist is. But the term is too close to Islamic and ends up stereotyping the religion.

Given that the Ottoman empire ended just 100 years ago, the link to religious rule is more recent in Islam. About the same time the Federal Reserve was created in America and they are still fighting about that!
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: A number of private companies tried that. The Natives would have no part of it, and the equipment wound up being the chiefs entertainment system.
[EX A]:
Non-insult