QUESTION: Following is info on BPS, Pipeline Segment and EC meetings in April / May. FYI - On the Triage call this afternoon, Kim announced the following BPS schedule for dealing with the recall order: ** Wed 4/3 conference call 8:30 - 12:30 central - agenda - only to identify the issues and not to work on any of the issues at this point ** Wed/Thurs 4/10 - 4/11 face to face @ Con Ed in NYC ** Wed 4/24 conference call 8:30 - 12:30 central ** Tues/Wed 4/30-5/1 face to face in Houston - probably @ CMS Kim indicated that on the 4/24 call we'd know better what additional meetings might be needed. I suggested that since the Technical and IR are meetings are in Houston Mon May 13 (Tech) and Tues/Wed May 14-15 (IR), that if there needs to be another face to face about that time, that we could possibly have it that Thursday and Friday (May 16-17) in Houston. Stay tuned on any dates after the May 1 meeting. Kim is going to try to have the NAESB office post this schedule this afternoon. ** Kim also asked me to remind everyone about the Pipeline Segment meeting to prepare for the BPS meetings (see her e-mail of 3/15/02)
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Order RM96-1-019 (Partial Day Recalls) - BPS Schedule is Official & Pipeline Segment Meeting
Hi Mark, I don't know what these folks are up to. In fact, I didn't know that Scott Laidlaw was involved. When I spoke with EECC I told them that they needed to get direction from you, someone from Mike Coleman's group, or an ENA developer. Any word from the Co Op/PB team? I have jury duty in just a little while, so I'll be out of touch for a short while. Kay
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Co-op City - Term Sheet
I will be on vacation from Monday the 19th through Monday the 26th (returning to the office on Tuesday the 27th). My cell phone and pager will not work either at sea or in the countries I will be visiting. I can be reached via Maritime Communications Network at (877)225-7447 - you will need to give my name and the name of the ship - Celebration. Since the rates are around $10 per minute, I don't plan to check my voicemail as often as usual but will call in when in port.
Answer: Vacation Memo
Here is an email: For Enron Canada Corp. and Enron Canada Power Corp., the following is a summary of change in control provisions: 1. Current Precedent Form of Master Firm Physical Gas Agreement - there is no change in control provision (individual contracts would ahve to be checked) 2. Current Precedent Form of Guarantee supporting the Gas Master - no change in control provision (individual contracts would ahve to be checked) 3. Current Precedent Form of Master Firm Physical Power Agreement - although there is no change in control provision, there is an "Event of Default" where a party reorganizes (including by asset transfer) into another entity and, at the time of such reorganization, the resulting entity fails to assume all the obligations of the predecessor party under that agreement (individual contracts would ahve to be checked) 4. Current Precedent Form of Guarantee supporting the Power Master - no change in control provision (individual contracts would ahve to be checked) 5. Physical GTCs (Gas and Power) - no change in control provision (individual contracts would ahve to be checked) 6. ISDA - there is an "Event of Default" where one party reorganizes (including by asset transfer) and the resulting entity does not assume the obligations of the preceding entity under the ISDA. There is also a "Credit Event upon Merger" when one party or its Credit Support Provider reorganizes and the creditworthiness of the resulting entity is "materially weaker" than the predecessor entity. A Credit Event upon Merger allows the non-affected party to terminate. (individual contracts would ahve to be checked) 7. Financial Omnibus - in the financial terms and conditions (Annex A) there is an "Event of Default" where a party reorganizes (including by asset transfer) into another entity and, at the time of such reorganization, either the resulting entity fails to assume all of the obligations of the Defaulting Party under the Confirmation or the resulting entity's creditworthiness is materially weaker than that of the Defaulting Party (mirroring the ISDA "Merger without Assumption" and "Credit Event upon Merger"). (individual contracts would ahve to be checked) 8. Impact Energy Subscription Agreement - no change in control provisions 9. Petro Canada Services Agreement - Section 11.4 indicates that Enron Canada ceasing to be an affiliate of Enron North America Corp. is a material breach of the agreement entitling PC to terminate the agreement in accordance with its terms. 10. Suncor Services Agreement - Article 18 allows for the termination of the agreement by Suncor if (i) there is a change in shareholding of either ECC or ENA that results in either or both ceasing to be an affiliate of Enron Corp. or (ii) ECC or ENA disposes of all or substantially all of its or their assets or (iii) ECC, ENA or Enron Corp. amalgamate, merge or consolidate into another entity other than an affiliate and such transaction would have a material adverse impact on the business on Suncor. 11. Sundance B Power Purchase Arangement - no change in control provision 12. British Energy Power Purchase Agreement - no change in control provision 13. OEFC Services Agreement - no change in control provision 14. ENERconnect Services Agreement - no change in control provision 15. SYNCRUDE Services Agreement - no change in control provision 16. CASCO Services Agreement - no change in control provision 17. Papier Masson Agreements - these were all transferred to Houston and should be checked by someone in EIM As far as trading agreements go, I believe that most if not all inter-company contracts (ie. between ECC and Enron Direct, ENA, EES, etc.) have a MAC clause relating to ownership by Enron Corp. but I am not aware of any third party trading agreements that would contain the same provision with respect to Enron Canada.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Material Contract Review
Q: Postle, I just did a download from Global Facilities of all the delivery points associated with Mid-C, NP15, SP15 and Rockies. You might want to get with Kara (or someone else in scheduling) to determine which points are still actively used. If you find that you're deleting alot more than you're keeping (as was our case), simply highlight the ones you want to take forward to UBS and send the file to Kim Theriot. Let me know if you have any questions! Casey
Propose a subject line
A: west delivery points
Here is an email: Mark Greenberg asked me to send you the Password Application to be used for the brokers. Actually, there will not be a Password Application. What they will be signing instead is the attached Fee Agreement. Any questions, call me, Mark Taylor or Mark Greenberg...
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
"PA" for Brokers