In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: Wrong, wrong, wrong. Most of us are interested in the common good, meaning the good of the nation. We don't concentrate on the man so much as on what he has done and is doing as president of this nation. It seems obvious that Trump has fired the FBI director for the director's refusal, reportedly in a private meeting, that the director end his investigation of Trump/Russia ties. It is a pressing need for our nation that these ties, if any, be identified, and the new special counsel will pursue that. I think it is you who is attempting to deflect attention from what Trump has done, to what the man, Trump, is. Good luck with that one, Trump is an absolute mess, our own Mad King George.

Answer: Non-identity-attack

Question: Comment: Hmmmmm.
Let me see. Someone to the south of us was just judged best suited for the task of the presidency solely because of his business background.
And he was celebrated during the campaign because he didn't "come across as "wishy washy."
That ain't working out too well.
Maybe we should apply some other criteria when selecting these guys.
To quote Betrand Russell:
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt."

Answer: Non-identity-attack

Question: Comment: LOL. Never thought of it like that. First time he turned up to shriek and flail was--IIRC--to comment on my 2015 Nat'l Feral Cat Day editorial. At least two of the other cat-nutter commentators in here posted last year as well. Heh--and they call US 'trolls'.

The embarrassing thing about Roy is that last year anti-TNR commentators (from elsewhere and who didn't know him) thought he was a teenager because of the frantic idiocy and immaturity of his posts. One of the 'lurkers' in here whom I know is on our side probably remembers too, because he made lengthy, patient efforts to reason with him, and Roy acted like a baboon and hurled heaps of childish crap at him in return.

I'll give him credit for putting a little more effort into the debate than he did last year, but now he seems to simply have degenerated into tantrums and name-calling. What seems to work (although it's taking a little longer this time) is to ridicule him until he gets sufficiently butt-hurt and leaves...

Answer:
Non-identity-attack