We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: I see, so banning guns just stops law abiding citizens from having them, yet your family of criminals buys them from people who legally obtained them, or has them legally obtained for them.
Sent2: Law abiding citizens obey the law, there can surely be no reason to prohibit them form having guns.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: So somebody try and tell us, that with stuff like this going on, that America still needs to overhaul its gun laws to bring them more in line with those of Mexico.
Sent2: If a person does not want to own or carry a gun then so be it, and if an individual does own guns then like wise.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: So now you're saying that just because somebody owns a gun, they're somehow more likely to start killing people than somebody who doesn't own a gun?
Sent2: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person.
[EX A]:
Similar