In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example input: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Example output: Sexual-explicit
Example explanation: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.
Q: Comment: All that blather and you still have yet to address the need to keep tabs on real pedophiles (who target prepubescent children not ovulating females) and rapists. Just because some bureaucratic nonsense put public urination and near-age statutory rape in the same category as monsters does not mean the monsters ought be let off the leash, and your suggestion otherwise makes me wonder why you spend so much effort finding ways for monsters to avoid detection by going so far as to suggest Jesus was a rape baby? What issue do you have with such an intimate and powerful experience being reserved for consenting adults, and not twisted to give an advantage to those who take it with power and despite the trauma done? If you cannot acknowledge the distinction, I suspect you to be monstrous.
A:
Sexual-explicit