input: (CNN) -- Former Olympic champion Angel Matos of Cuba faces a life ban after kicking a referee flush in the face during his taekwondo bronze medal match in Beijing.

Matos reacted in extraordinary fashion to being disqualified by Chelbat.

Matos, who took gold in Sydney in 2000, was winning 3-2, with just over a minute left in the second round, when he fell to the mat after being hit by his opponent, Kazakhstan's Arman Chilmanov.

Matos lay down, awaiting medical attention, but was then disqualified by referee Chakir Chelbat of Sweden for taking too much injury time.

A furious Matos reacted by pushing a judge, then pushed and kicked Chelbat in the face.

It left the Swede with blood pouring from his lip while Matos spat on the floor and was then escorted out of the arena.

"We didn't expect anything like what you have witnessed to occur," said World Taekwondo Federation secretary general Yang Jin-suk.

"I am at a loss for words," he told the Associated Press.

Matos' coach, Leudis Gonzalez, is also in hot water for his angry reaction and claiming the Kazakhs had tried to fix the match.

"This is an insult to the Olympic vision, an insult to the spirit of taekwondo and, in my opinion, an insult to mankind," Yang added.

Although the arena announcer said Matos and his coach were banned effective immediately, Yang said due process must be followed before officially banning the two.

It was not the only controversial moment in the four-day taekwondo competition, which was marred by several protests against judging decisions. 1. was Matos disqualified?
2. who disqualified him?
3. was matos happy about it?
4. who did he kick in the face?
5. what metal was he pursuing?
6. did security expect matos to act out?
7. what did the secretary general say about it?
8. who did he tell?
9. who is matos coach?
10. is he in trouble too? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. Yes
2. the announcer
3. no
4. Chelbat
5. bronze medal
6. no
7. He didn't expect it and was at a loss for words.
8. Associated Press
9. Leudis Gonzalez
10. yes

input: Unlike in Westminster style legislatures or as with the Senate Majority Leader, the House Majority Leader's duties and prominence vary depending upon the style and power of the Speaker of the House. Typically, the Speaker does not participate in debate and rarely votes on the floor. In some cases, Majority Leaders have been more influential than the Speaker; notably Tom DeLay who was more prominent than Speaker Dennis Hastert. In addition, Speaker Newt Gingrich delegated to Dick Armey an unprecedented level of authority over scheduling legislation on the House floor.

The current Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, of the United States House of Representatives serves as floor leader of the opposition party, and is the counterpart to the Majority Leader. Unlike the Majority Leader, the Minority Leader is on the ballot for Speaker of the House during the convening of the Congress. If the Minority Leader's party takes control of the House, and the party officers are all re-elected to their seats, the Minority Leader is usually the party's top choice for Speaker for the next Congress, while the Minority Whip is typically in line to become Majority Leader. The Minority Leader usually meets with the Majority Leader and the Speaker to discuss agreements on controversial issues. 1. What was Nancy Pelosi's title?
2. Where?
3. What is her relation to the Majority Leader?
4. She is the floor leader for which party?
5. Is the Minority Leader listed on a ballot?
6. For what?
7. When?
8. Who is the number one choice for Speaker?
9. How many people get together to talk about issues that are controversial?
10. Who?
11. Does the Speaker of the House take part in debates?
12. How often do they vote?
13. Who did Newt Gingrich give some authority to?
14. Was it a lot?
15. What was he doing with it?
16. Whas Newt a Majority Leader?
17. Whas Dick?
18. What was Newt?
19. Are the Majority Leaders duties set in stone?
20. What do they depend on? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. Minority Leader
2. United States House of Representatives
3. counterpart to the Majority Leader.
4. opposition party
5. Yes
6. Speaker of the House
7. the convening of the Congress
8. usually the Minority Leader
9. Three
10. The Minority Leader, Majority Leader and the Speaker
11. Typically not
12. rarely
13. Dick Armey
14. Yes
15. scheduling legislation on the House floor.
16. No
17. Yes
18. Speaker
19. No
20. the style and power of the Speaker of the House.

input: The wedding between Prince Wiliam and Kate Middleton on April 29 has focused the world's camera lenses on the UK.

In Britain, there is a constant debate about the relevance of the royal family to modern British society. However, Windsor (the family name of the British Royal Family) and Middleton have been seen to represent a more modern, forward-looking nation.

Nigel Baker, the British ambassador to Bolivia, believes that the royal wedding is "about modern Britain". "The estimated 2 billion spectators across the world will see that Britain is one of the most culturally and ethnically diverse nations in the world, home to 270 nationalities speaking 300 different languages, founded on tolerance and respect for difference," wrote Baker on his blog.

According to Baker, the wedding could help viewers to see "why Britain is one of the most dynamic and creative countries in the world": The television on which most people watched the event was invented by John Logie Baird, a Briton, and the World Wide Web that broadcast the event to millions more was invented by another Briton, Tim Berners-Lee.

The guests who attended the wedding ceremony gave more than a few clues as to the nature of modern Britain. David and Victoria Beckham represent Britain's obsession with football and celebrity.

Leaders from different religious backgrounds supported Baker's comments on the multicultural nature of modern British society.

Before the wedding, David Elliott, arts director of the British Council China, agreed that the wedding would be a showcase for modern Britain: "I think, and hope, that it (modern British influence) would be values like openness, multiculturalism, creativity, sense of humor and the traditional British sense of fair play," he said.

Furthermore, events such as the Olympics in London in 2012 may also increase people's sense of Britishness.

According to a poll published in Daily Telegraph, more than a third of people in the UK admitted they felt "very British" when watching the Olympics. 1. What is there a debate about?
2. Was there a special event?
3. What was it?
4. Who was getting married?
5. Who was he going to wed?
6. When was the wedding to be?
7. How many will view the nuptuals?
8. What will they see?
9. How many languages are spoken there?
10. Did any athletes attend the wedding?
11. Who?
12. What does he play?
13. Did anyone attend with him?
14. Who?
15. Is she an ahlete as well?
16. Did half the country feel "very British" watching the Olympics?
17. What percentage reported feeling so?
18. According to what?
19. Who published the poll?
20. Was the wedding shown streaming on the web Return numbered answers in your output.

output:
1. The relevance of the royal family in modern society
2. Yes
3. A wedding.
4. Prince William.
5. Kate Middleton
6. April 29
7. "An estimated 2 billion
8. britain is one of the most diverse cultures in the world.
9. 300
10. Yes
11. David Beckham
12. Football
13. Yes
14. Victoria Beckham
15. A celebrity
16. No
17. more than a third
18. A poll
19. The Daily Telegraph
20. Yes