In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Peter: The reason why it's difficult to take deal with issues raised in the letter is that the writer is largely dealing in hyperbole and bromides.

Here's an example: "Trump's tax cuts would increase investment, boost productivity and wages and increase innovation and opportunities for all Americans." That's silly. Tax cuts for the super-wealthy don't result in any of those things (or if they do the effect is neglible). The Bush tax cuts sure didn't result in that stuff.

Most of the other statement are similar. Just a whole bucket of simplistic statements with little regard for the complexity of any of these issues.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Also, humility. Garrison doesn't put on any airs. But Mr. Keillor is a bright bulb, illuminating general human follies and particularly, the foolishness of high-falutin' folks. His support of Hillary Clinton as an honest, hard-working, and people-oriented politician is something that has been totally lacking in our media coverage. Clinton is a wonky gem with a heart. D.T. is a fraud with a giant ego backed up by nothing more than intestinal gas.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Idiots.

A:
Non-identity-attack
****