IN: This is an email
Rex/Mark - As we discussed, I am not confident that the Automated Securities Clearance NDA sufficiently covers us in this new matter. I have called Henry Bonner at SunGard to verify the legal structure to see if we can or cannot use it; however, he has yet to return my call. I have prepared the attached based upon a belief that we should have in place an NDA specifically with SunGard Trading & Risk Systems. Because we also want to move this matter forward, I have attached to the agreement a "Schedule A" in which I have outlined the work that SunGard will be performing for us - at least at the onset. If we go beyond the first five days of this work, we should definitely have a formal consulting agreement signed to ensure we have a clear path forward on the work to be done and deliverables to be provided. In the meantime, please take a look at the attached and let me know if this works. Thanks.

What is the subject?

OUT: SunGard
QUESTION: I left Mike a message telling him that I was forwarding this to you and that someone on your team would verify this information and get back to him. His note asks for info back by Friday the 17th - Friday is the 15th and I assume that is the deadline that he intends. Thanks. --Sally
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Perry Gas Companies, Inc.
The invoices for August 2001 settlements were posted by 10:42 AM today, Saturday, September 8, 2001. The NYISO apologizes for any inconvenience resulting in posting these invoices a day after they were scheduled. The Customer Settlements group makes every effort to render accurate invoices on a timely basis. Although issued a day after their scheduled posting, the invoices are still being issued within the 5-business days. {I'd forgotten about Labor Day when I set up the schedule.} Transmission Customers will observe adjustments for an error on in May 2000 Settlement Adjustment invoices that were issued in July. The total adjustment amounted to $2,081,568.11 and was allocated across 2,261,753.08 MWh. Customers may validate their respective adjustments by computing their ratio shares of the $2,081,568.11 using 2,261,753 MWh as the denominator in their respective ratios of their May 2000 load. The reason the denominator of the ratio share appears small is because the pay out of this adjustment is to the Transmission Owners. In order not to assess the TO's a proportionate share of the $2,081,568.11, which would defeat the purpose of the adjustment, their withdrawals have been excluded from the ratio share. Transmission Owners should observe a credit on their invoices based upon their respective megawatt-mile coefficients for the period. With regard to the November 1999 & December 1999 settlement adjustments that were scheduled to be issued on the 7th, the NYISO intends to issue those invoices next week. The issuance dates will ensure that customers will have at least 5 business days to review the invoices prior to payments being due to the NYISO. If necessary, the NYISO will reschedule settlement dates for these months should our reconciliations take longer to complete; however, we do not anticipate this at this time. In addition, I'd like to take this opportunity to clarify a point that I made in a TIE posting regarding the rebilling of the August 25th settlements. The initial billing runs for August 25th were done without considering ConEd's sub-zonal load. As a result, it appeared as though there was no load in the ConEd sub-zones on the 25th and all DAM purchases and bilateral transactions in those sub-zones were sold back to the market in real time causing the Schedule 1 residual adjustment to be grossly inflated. The reason this occurred was due to what appears to have been a frame relay problem between the NYISO & ConEd resulting in the NYISO not receiving a file from ConEd. By no means was my email notification of this event to imply that ConEd was not complying with the daily load provision process. This was merely a hardware/communications issue. Regards,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: August 2001 invoices
Effective immediately we are changing the way we handle deliveries to Oglethorpe on Transco. Current Process ENA sales gas to Oglethorpe at St 85 ENA buys gas from EPMI (deal 318335) at St 85 at Gas Daily ENA sells gas back to EPMI at Doyle Plant at Gas Daily plus variable cost. New Process ENA sells gas to Oglethorpe at St 85 (deal 329314, baseload deal and deal 318423, gas daily deal) ENA does an exchange buy (deal 338732) at St 85. Curretly, this volume will match the sale to Oglethorpe at St 85 ENA does an exchange sell (deal 338735), volume on this deal will be the amount on deal 338732 less Z4 to Z4 fuel.
Answer: Oglethorpe Power
Here is an email: Blue Range Resources Corporation is an executed ISDA Master we have for ECT Canada that went into bankruptcy. It shows up on my list because I'm working off the original list, but it is not a good Credit counterparty so it doesn't show up on Credit's approved counterparty list. I just want to make sure that we don't send them any mailouts.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Bankrupt Counterparty
QUESTION: U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE INFORMATION CENTER World Data Center for Seismology, Denver Reply to: sedas@neis.cr.usgs.gov or neic@usgs.gov The following is from the United States Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center: Preliminary hypocenter for earthquake of 2001 Jul 19, UTAH, about 25 miles (40 km) NNE of Loa, Utah: latitude 38.7 degrees north, longitude 111.5 degrees west, origin time 20 15 34.0 utc, depth 3 km, magnitude 4.3. The magnitude and location may be revised when additional data and further analysis results are available. There have been no reports of damage. The location and magnitude for this earthquake were furnished by the University of Utah, Salt Lake City. Stations used: MSU eP 201544.3 MVU eP 201545.2 SRU eP 201550.5 PV10 P 201552.5 MPU eP 201557.9 DUG eP 201605.0 DAU eP 201605.2 ARUT eP 201606.5 NOQ eP 201608.3 CTU P 201609.0 PV01 P 201616.1 ELK P 201629.7 TPNV P 201639.8 BW06 P 201641.5 BMN P 201648.6 ISCO P 201648.9 HAYW P 201650.8 HLID eP 201654.8 ANMO eP 201658.3 LAZ P 201659.8 LENM P 201703.8 LPM P 201705.7 BNM P 201706.9 MCMT P 201709.3 JLDW P 201709.4 TUC qPn 201710.6 WVOR ePn 201713.7 BOZ eP 201718.7 CHMT P 201738.9 WALA eP 201808.8 WMOK eP 201814.0 MIAR eP 201908.8 ULM P 201920.8 SIUC P 201943.4 PWLA P 202001.5 LRAL P 202016.8 GOGA P 202043.8 EDIS-07-19-01 1443 PDT
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
[EDIS] EQ MAG 4 3 UTAH [News: Statewide]