In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: In one of them, a congressional hearing on the minimum wage becomes an attack ad as Rep. Choices: 1. The congressional hearing on minimum wage was a peaceful event. 2. There was a congressional hearing about the minimum wage. 3. There was much disagreement at the hearing.
2

Statement: He's a proselytizer of newspapers. Choices: 1. The newspaper originally had ideas that countered his own. 2. The newspaper changes its views based on him. 3. He hasn't prolytized a single newspaper in his life.
2

Statement: Indeed, in Japan's consensus-based management system, the response of politicians, bureaucrats, and business leaders seemed to be to look the other way and hope bad news would disappear. Choices: 1. Japan didn't have a consensus-based management system. 2. The tendency of politicians to avoid bad news put strain on foreign partnerships. 3. Japan's management system was consensus-based.
3