Question: Sentence A: Perhaps there's a third way, and that's just to admit that we're incapable of being logically rigorous about issues involving the unconceived.

Sentence B: Logic should always be the driving force of thought.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: It finances issue discussion in this country.
It takes resources from issue discussion.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Other tombs in the valley are much more instructive about Egyptian life, death, and the afterlife.

Here is a hypothesis:
All the tombs in the valley have the exact same carvings.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: you know i don't know what he would do but

Sentence 2: I know everything he does, maybe more than he remembers.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
The hypocrisy buster?

Does it follow that "It will not bust the hypocrisy."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "Both have their trade-offs.", can we conclude that "Neither of them had any trade-offs. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no