In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Such an absurd comment. Actually, this will directly benefit affordable projects, because they will pass the savings onto residents, just as occurs with lower utility bills due to conservation. As for discouragement of larger projects: silly. The cost increment is so modest per square foot, and the cost benefit so clear, that it will not impede the decision to appropriately scale.

Suggesting this is racist is silliest of all. Environmental benefit benefits all. Environmental Equity's a thing, focusing on the obligation of all to provide healthy conditions for all, particularly those most disenfranchised.

But mostly: look at the economics. This is an unambiguous step forward.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Ah, I get it now. You actually have no idea what the NRA does, you just implied blacks are criminals, and you think a responsible gun owner is the same thing as a criminal in Detroit.

Perhaps we should start with getting you educated on these topics, first. Then we can talk about my gun rights and why you think you know something about them.
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Trump signed it for two reasons: 1. First and foremost, if he didn't sign it, it would make him look like an even worse Russia sycophant than he clearly already is to Mueller. 2. He knows he is powerless to stop the bill. Rather than look like the idiot he is, he prefers to sign it, pretend he's doing it for the people, then indulge in his favorite past time: Whining endlessly about how he's been screwed.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack