Problem: Here is a premise:
He underlines the problems with this arrangement.

Here is a hypothesis:
He is a teacher underlining problems on a paper submitted by a student.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Maybe I'm overreacting, but I think Clinton is courting disaster here.

Sentence 2: I think Clinton will be glad he did this.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
This was nothing else than unhappiness packaged as multi-flavor chocolates produced locally from natural domestic ingredients.

Does it follow that "Multi-flavor chocolates produced locally from natural domestic ingredients were nothing else than unhappiness in a package."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If that that that's uh yeah that's absolutely right and you can gain a lot of ground doing that too if you, can we say that "You won't earn anything by doing that"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"yeah i don't think i uh i would have to say i probably didn't get to spend as much time as i would have liked to either uh however i did you know uh early on i was in the retail business and i worked late hours so i saw less of them then but then when i changed over and got into electronics industry i uh"
Hypothesis: I worked in the electronics industry before I was ever in the retail business.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: oh yeah that's what she said they they were going to have the governor was going to try to have it declared a disaster area

Sentence 2: She said they were going to try to get the governor to declare it a disaster area.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes