This is the content of an email: Kathy, Could you run a mini-book of all the deals in my FX book as of today. I am setting up a new model and want to double check that I have all the correct deals. Thanx,

Subject: IM FX Positions

This is the content of an email: Jeff, Please, take a look at the resume I got from my friend. Vince P.S. what follows is a copy of his message to me: Dear Vincent, I very much would like to ask you for a career advice. I am looking for new challenges and new professional opportunities. Possibly there would be such opportunity around yourself at Enron Corporation. I trust that my strongest asset is my intellectual capital and ability to look from new angles into complex issues. Beside of the experience of working under Jacob Goldfield an Paul Jacobson at Goldman on the interest rate swaps and proprietary desks, I was a part of research effort of John Meriwether group at Salomon Brothers, I headed the European interest options desk at DKBI in London and I have managed a small hedge fund in partnership with Albert Friedberg. I hold Ph.D. in mathematics from MIT and I have studied under Nobel Laureate in Economics, Bob Merton. I very much would like to apply my knowledge of capital markets, trading and research in the field of energy markets. With my very best regards and personal wishes,

Subject: A resume

This is the content of an email: Business&Finance: ESB ownership of network is questioned - Competition Authority says separation of national grid from core company does not go far enough. Arthur Beesley reports 11/13/2000 Irish Times 18 Copyright (C) 2000 Irish Times; Source: World Reporter (TM) The Competition Authority has questioned the ESB's ownership of the electricity network in the newly deregulated power market. In a paper submitted to the Department of Public Enterprise, the body said the separation of the ESB's National Grid operation from the core company did not go far enough to ensure fair competition. It said arguments in favour of the ESB retaining the transmission and distribution system ignored the 'overwhelming conclusion' that a generation company which owns such assets 'will naturally favour itself' at the expense of customers and reliability. The paper has not been published yet. It is believed to state, however, that the ESB's retention of its 'non-competitive' transmission and distribution assets and its 'competitive' electricity generation business was unwise from a competition perspective. The National Grid, which controls when individual power stations feed electricity into the network, was separated from the ESB when 27 per cent of the market was opened last February. In theory, this meant the ESB could not favour its own generation stations over more efficient competitors when deciding which plant to switch on and off as demand for power fluctuates. But the authority's response to the Statutory Instrument behind the separation - which renamed the National Grid as Eirgrid - said more should be done to ensure the market operates fairly. The paper said: 'Some argue that as long as there is an independent operator of the underlying transmission system, ownership of the transmission system can remain in the hands of an upstream generation operator. 'In accordance with this line of argument, the shift of operational control of electricity transmission to Eirgrid would mean that discrimination in dispatch [of power] and other operations would not be possible. However, the Competition Authority considers that this argument ignores the overwhelming conclusion that the generation company that owns the transmission lines will naturally favour itself.' The Statutory Instrument followed complex talks, which led to an agreement between the ESB, its trade unions and the Minister for Public Enterprise, Ms O'Rourke. When Eirgrid was formed, the ESB retained ownership and responsibility to develop and maintain the high-voltage national transmission system and the low-voltage local distribution network. The authority says these, too, should be separated from the ESB to ensure the competitive market functions fairly, according to a person familiar with its paper. This would ensure equal access to the power network and an objective, transparent, non-discriminatory treatment of all electricity generators in the market, it said. The paper argues the ESB has an incentive to allocate as many costs as possible to the operation of the transmission and distribution system. Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 100

Subject: EBS News

This is the content of an email: Hi everybody, I happened on an addition to my search for info while doing a little research last night. There just might not be anything on this out there yet, but I was at Asus' website last night and it seems they have a new dual-processer motherboard out called a CUV266-DLS and I can't find anything about it anywhere. Maybe it's too new or too expensive for anyone to have bothered with up to this point but I'm snooping around so if you've heard anything... Avram
Subject: More DAW