Q: Andy, UBS has given us a list of open due diligence items made by UBS' Market Risk Group. We would like to have due diligence completed by this evening so that we might sign soon thereafter. Below are the items for which you were identified as NetCo contact. Please let me know the status of this information and send it to me as soon as possible. If you need any assistance from me, do not hesitate to call. 3) Detailed explanation of funding assumptions which would include what levels the traders expected to receive funding from Treasury and how Treasury derived both overnight and term internal lending rates. - Andy Zipper 4) A detailed description of how volatility curves are currently being built. Description should include what inputs are used, are outputs consistent with inputs, and are these curves independently verified by a internal control group. - Andy Zipper Regards,
Propose a subject line
A: Open due diligence items
IN: Another FAS 133 Offsite meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, Feb 29 (all day). Sally asked me to forward this to you - would like you to attend if at all possible. Scott, this is an FYI for you - I know you will be overseas on this date. Patti

Generate a subject line.

OUT: FAS 133 Offsite
IN: This is an email
Attached are the draft ConfirmLogic documents for Entergy Koch for your review. Prior to this going to a wider circulation within Enron for comment I would appreciate any comments or suggestions on the structure and format. There are many definitions in these documents that will need careful review to ensure that the end result is consistent with our practice. Exhibit A needs to be modified so that the Index name is consistent with what will be input into ConfirmLogic. There are also some missing variables in certain of the indexes that will need clarification. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Regards,

What is the subject?

OUT: Entergy Koch ConfirmLogic
QUESTION: D-Rock, Attached are a clean and redlined copy with my comments. I have noted a couple of areas where I still have questions. One that I didn't note in the agreement, is my concern that they could deny us a new Delivery Point if we can't agree on terms. We need to discuss this one tommorrow. I will shout out at ya tommorrow. The Artist
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Maverick Revisions
I just wanted to let you know that I know that we are in a hot spot now, but I have all the confidence in you and Enron. I trust in God, but I have a lot of confidence in you too. You have kept Enron an ethical and decent company to deal with and to work for over the years. I was gone from the company (laid off 5 years ago) but returned 13 months ago and I just celebrated my tenth anniversary with the company and I would like to say that I am so proud to be back working for Enron. Those five years I was gone, I never lost my allegiance to thecompany even though I was no longer an employee, I felt as though I was still a member of the Enron family. I have always felt that Enron cared about its employees and in talking with some of my co-workers, those who have been here for a while, feel the same as I do. I want to let you know that I am praying for you and the company and I know you will bring us through this time of trouble with God's help. Keep your spitits up. God bless you. Georgia Matula EES Data Management
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Confidence
Curricular Review Task Force (CRTF) Report # 9 (October 1, 2001) The Curriculum Review Task Force held its first meeting for the academic year on August 23, 2001. We reviewed the work done last May to tie up loose ends and to plan the work for the year. During the intensive work sessions in the last week of May, the eight faculty members of the Task Force (including the Chair) had made detailed presentations to our group on eight topics related to the Curriculum Review (Please see my last report for details). It was decided that these members would write a summary of their presentations, including their cited references, and circulate them to the other members of the Task Force. After reviewing these summaries, and remembering the strategic curricular initiatives collectively decided on by our faculty and staff during the Purser-Gans Conference, each Task Force member was asked to come up with five Educational Goals which would guide our future work. Meanwhile, it had been decided in consultation with the Faculty Senate that the Fall Faculty/Staff Conference would focus on the Curricular Review. The Task Force had decided last May that the first two curricular initiatives to be considered are (1) Reinvestment in Pedagogy and (2) Communication Across the Curriculum. These two topics became the key themes for the Faculty/Staff Conference. The Task Force met with the Conference Planning Group on August 20 and it was agreed that the small group discussions will be led by seven Task Force members. The Faculty Conference held on August 23 was very productive in providing valuable input for the work of the Task Force. In a general sense the Conference gave a vote of confidence for the work and approach of the CRTF. We have taken detailed notes of the discussions in the small groups and the plenary session. On September 12th and 19th, the Task Force held intensive work sessions in the Boone House from 5:30 to 9:00 p.m. Each member, as agreed earlier, brought a list of five Educational Goals and after a lengthy discussion we have arrived at six educational goals and a list of operational ends for each of them. These goals focus on the competencies to be developed by our students and the learning outcomes of our academic program. After these are finalized, we will arrange an open meeting to discuss them with our faculty. On September 24, the Task Force met with the Assessment Committee and Dr. Susan Holm, Chair of the MFL department. The Assessment Committee discussed with us its plans and the list of eight Assessment Review Questions prepared by the Committee. Dr. Holm discussed the role of foreign language learning in the liberal arts education, the recent changes in MFL majors/minors/concentration and her department=s plans for further changes. The details of these discussions will be available in our minutes which will be posted in the public folders later this week. To access this folder, please go to Public Folders, All Public Folders, Documents, College, Curricular Review Task Force. We are planning to meet with other departments in the near future. Thanks. Raj Ambrose, Chair Curriculum Review Task Force.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Curricular Review Task Force Report #9