Problem: Here is a premise:
annual basis in DOD, strong incentives exist for the program office to make optimistic assumptions about development cost and schedule.

Here is a hypothesis:
There's every reason to believe that funding won't be an issue for the development schedule.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: When the carbon dioxide emissions trader looked at the full barf bag, he couldn't help but comment:

Sentence 2: The carbon dioxide emissions trader was grossed out.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
you know it's like all of a sudden when there's noticeable things saying hey you know we're ruining the earth you know and now everybody is doing something about which is good

Does it follow that "it really took fear to motivate all these people to do something"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If We arrived back in a very cheerful mood. , can we say that "We cane back in a good mood. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"Residence is a term of art within the meaning of immigration law and is not synonymous with physical presence."
Hypothesis: In immigration law, there are some terms of art.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: Ultimately, what I say in my defense is completely meaningless.

Sentence 2: I will lose the case.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell