IN: Here is an update on Oakhill power sourcing: Wholesale Generation + Ancillaries ? Electric cooperatives and municipalities are exempt from retail deregulation. We can not directly contract with AEP or whoever the wholesale generation provider would be because it constitutes a retail sale in a non-deregulated area. The prevailing utility in the area must be the buyer of the power. ? Generation + ancillaries will be provided by the chosen entity, through NTEC, and then through Rusk. The wholesale generation + ancillaries contract will be a three party agreement between AEP (or whoever is chosen), NTEC, and Rusk. ? Swing - There are consumption penalties for using more or less than the contracted 5.0 MW 7x24 block (meaning there is no free swing). These penalties are part of the ancillary services, which means that we will not have the exact specifications until Rusk receives the bids on their RFP on 6/27/01. T&D ? T&D is provided directly by Rusk County Electric Co-Op. ? NTEC is charging us $0.20 / MW as an administrative fee (mark up), which is why the fixed T&D cost from Rusk County is $10.20/MW and not $10.00/MW. ? There will be a minimum T&D charge from Rusk, above which we pay for only what we use: o For example: We pay the minimum charge or actual usage, whichever is higher. Ricki is constructing the T&D only contract (which he claims will be similar in structure to the previous contract), with the inclusion of T&D pricing and swing. I also reminded him that he needs to provide the audited financial statements to us. Attached is a deal diagram with the most current information that we have. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Oakhill Power Update
IN: This is an email
Got a call from Dennis out of the blue this afternoon. He's pretty gung ho, and also alluded to several other projects he's got on the front burner (gas-fired power deals). He had met again with some DOE folks in DC about the power contract and feels it is 70-80% locked in. Have you ever known a project developer who would admit to less than 70-80% odds??? I look forward to talking on Tuesday. DF

What is the subject?

OUT: Pueblo
QUESTION: The Tozzini lawyers will meet with us to discuss prior memoranda and products for trading. For those in Houston who wish to be conferenced in, please contact my assistant Kaye Ellis in Houston (X35968) who will make arrangements. Thanks. Sara
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: conference call, Tuesday, November 30, 2:00 pm (Brazil time)
CP, Go ahead and put me in the Marriot. I should give this a try. Plus it will make them plan better for us. m
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: OU trip
Charlene, I am sending you as promised the information I have about 3 of our summer interns. I shall fax you this morning two additional resumes I have in hard copy. In the case of Paulo Rocha we don't have a formal resume, just a letter from him with the summary of his skills. Thanks for your help. Enron desperately needs this talent. Vince
Answer: Resumes
Q: The time is blocked for Michelle Lokay and Paul Y'Barbo, tomorrow from 2:00 until 3:00. I still need to let them know the subject. I will also need to schedule one-on-one's with all Marketing Directors when you give me the go-ahead. Have TK and Mike already had theirs? Thank you, Ricki
Propose a subject line
A:
Meeting Scheduled