In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: Just what the oil and gas needs when values are hardly above the break even point. I see more than shades of excessive regulation when the industry is just limping under the strain of lower prices, only the liberals could up with more brain farts.
Non-identity-attack

Comment: Gay folk don't define themselves by sexual acts any more than heterosexuals to. It is the sodomy-obsessed gay-haters who try to impose such a definition.
Identity-attack

Comment: Hodes implies that by not speaking out against Zille's tweet, Jews are somehow deserving of tis horrendous tweet; specifically because Zille is Jewish. Is she not, also, say, female? English? A Capetonian? Why impose the obligation onto Jews only? Why not attack any other group? The truth is, there is no justification in supposing that the Jewish community needs to speak out simply because Zille is Jewish. After all, she did not speak as a Jew. Hode's contention is that Jews somehow deserved Mnxgitama's racist tweet. That contention is in itself racist, and absurd.
Identity-attack