Q: Good Afternoon Sara, I wanted to follow up to see what the status is regarding the Credit Suisse First Boston Equity Swap Basket documentation. Please advise! Regards,
Propose a subject line
A: CSFB- Equity Swap Basket Documentation

Q: The Enron Net Works Offsite has been relocated to the Doubletree Hotel - Allen Center for all day Monday, April 24, only. Once I have all the details confirmed, i.e. meeting room, start time etc., I'll advise. Listed below are the presentations scheduled for Monday. An Agenda will be forthcoming. Louise Kitchen EOL Greg Piper Paper Exchange.com Harry Arora Securities Philippe Bibi Trading Platform Technology Bryan Seyfried Credit Mike McConnell International eCommerce Development Should you have any questions, please contact me @ 31935. Many Thanks, Liz
Propose a subject line
A: Location Change for ENW Offsite

Q: Davis' deadlines on energy much easier set than met By Emily Bazar Bee Staff Writer (Published Feb. 23, 2001) Exactly one week ago, Gov. Gray Davis sounded hopeful, optimistic even, when he predicted that the state and its debt-ridden utilities would forge an agreement by today on a plan to save the companies from financial doom. Problem is, it won't work out that way. Negotiations between state officials and the investor-owned utilities have produced no comprehensive agreement to announce today. Davis' predictions during the energy crisis have been wrong before. For weeks, he has set deadlines for agreements and legislative action that haven't been met. On deadline days, even when there's little substantive progress to report, Davis often holds news conferences anyway -- many of them
Propose a subject line
A: Davis' deadlines on energy much easier set than met

Q: Mark, Tom, and Holden, In reference to the DPR impacts of $ 132,000 (WAPA) and $133,000 (SRP) that you were expecting, here is an explanation of why you will not be seeing that in your PMA's: The 2 deals listed below were put in as a MW month, each with 3 strips in the deal separating out April 1, April 2, and the rest of the month. The reason for the 3 strips was to catch the April 1 time change from PST to PDT. deal # 539126: 3 strips @ 2216 = 199,500 charge for the month in CARP (true value is - $66,500). deal # 538832: 3 strips @ 2180 = 196,200 charge for the month in CARP (true value is - $65,400) . Typically, I provide you with a report that tells you what $ amount to look for coming thru in your PMA's, according to the changes that I am making on the back end. You then see the change in DPR come thru on a PMA report that Risk provides for you. When these deals hit Settlements, we recognized that the CARP was calculating both deals at 3 times their monthly value (and since we are purchasing, that is a negative three times against your books). When the above + DPR impacts didn't come thru in your PMA's, we started looking at the deals to figure out why they didn't. Here is a discription of the Risk - Settlements process: Risk values a deal on the day of liquidation. Any intra-month changes, even if they happen after the day of flow, get trued up by Risk and changed in the DPR. Anything that gets changed after the end of the month, Settlements recognizes as a DPR variance and reports this to Risk and you see it affect your DPR as reported in the PMA report. So the question was: When it came to recognizing a variance in Settlements, why weren't we seeing a + amount back to your books for 2 of the strips that I zero'd out? Houston Settlements looked into it and were seeing that these deals were originally valued at ($66,500) and ($65,400), even though CARP was showing that they were calculating at ($199,500) and ($196,200) .... Heather Dunton and I did alot of searching for the answer and we found that: When Risk flashed these deals in April, they flashed them according to a single MW month charge. Regardless of how many strips there are, the deal is set up as a MW month and should, therefore, calculate as one single charge for the month. We found that CARP is reading these incorrectly and causing the confusion, (as I was seeing that the deals were calculating 3 times because that is how CARP and UNIFY were reading the deal). The IT people in Houston are now working on fixing that glitch. When it comes to DPR, your book originally recognized an impact of (66,500) and (65,400), which is correct. Since your April DPR was correct, you will not see an adjustment in your PMA's. I recognize that this is not gratification for the + DPR impact that you were expecting and I apologize for the confusion and mis-information that I gave you in my report. This has, however, helped us to hi-light a technical error that will save us alot of work in the future. Thanks for your patience while we figured this out. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A:
DPR on your PMA's