Q: Hi there, I thought I'd check back to see where we are on the Delta (Salmon) break out contract, now that we know that the stabilizers should be included. How's it looking? Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: Breakout contract
IN: Alex, Can you set up a meeting to review this product. They have an office in Houston. Please, invite people on the distribution list. Vince

Generate a subject line.

OUT: PoweRisk 2000 followup in re WeatherDelta
IN: This is an email
03/29/02 FINANCIAL STATUS FOR 03/29/02 10:02 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT: 40781075 ENRON N.A. CORP-ENA CASH SRV 20208846139 SAME DAY CR TRANSFER 2,735,550.05 GID:C0020880869301 CHP0073745 REF: 0209100088JO BENEF REF:CAP OF 02/03/29 ORDER: 009102771343 DUKE ENERGY FIELD SER VICES, LP. C/O DUKE ENERGY FIELD SERVICES IN C P O BOX 5493 DENVER CO 80217- ORIG BK: 0002 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK DETAILS:PAYMENT TO ENRON FOR SETTLEMENT OF STORAGE FEES DUE POST BANKRUPTCY. INSTRUCT DATE:03/29/02 ADVICE TYPE:NONE

What is the subject?

OUT: Duke $
QUESTION: Elizabeth: I am one of the contract attorneys from Bracewell & Patterson assisting EES on various projects. One of the matters which has been delegated to me is the review of a Master Power Purchase & Sale Agreement between EES and A'lones. I met with Richard Ring yesterday, and he indicated that you might be able to answer a few questions. First, Richard has informed me that ENA was heavily involved in the development of this document, and, as a result, the form is used "as is" and without amendment, save for information to be provided in the Cover Sheet. One of my "marching orders" is that choice of law provisions in EES paper should require Texas law. The Edison form opts for New York. Is this something that can be changed? Second, what about more substantive matters, such as who takes the lead in sending transaction confirmations? In the A'lones transaction, it is contemplated that EES will be the Buyer. The Edison form places primary confirmation obligations on the Seller. I am informed that EES prefers to be the confirming party, regardless of whether it is the buyer or seller. Is this something that can be changed? Third, there are a variety of typographical and reference errors. i.e. double commas (see paragraph 2.2), doubled phrases (paragraph 5.1(h)(i)), and possibly mistaken use of defined terms (see use of "Product" in second line of paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2). What is the Company's position on correcting these types of items? I apologize that this is being e-mailed, as it would probably be quicker by phone, but my connection to the phone system is lagging somewhat behind my connection to the computer network. Thank you for your time and attention. Scott L. Franck Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Edison Electric Institute/Master Power Purchase & Sale Agreement
February 29, 2000 Received 2/29/00 11:30 am Posted 2/29/00 11:30 am Dear Producers and Shippers, In January, you were notified that the Schultz Gas Processing Plant would be permanently shut down on February 29, 2000. We heard from many of you regarding the financial hardship this shut down may cause Schultz area producers while a gas delivery alternative was being constructed. Given your concerns and given that natural gas liquids prices have risen sufficiently to allow operations at Schultz to be marginally profitable, CNG Transmission will continue to operate the Schultz facility until: 1. it becomes uneconomic to continue operations or, 2. CNG develops a compression/pipeline alternative for delivering and processing the Schultz area gas elsewhere on its system.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: CNG note
I have modified the letter slightly to try and shift the burden of being notified as to internal policy matters back to the counterparty. Let me know if you think this approach works or if you have suggested improvements in the language. Thanks
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Apparent Authority Letter