One can not be hamming HITs and looking through a telescope simultaneously.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A child is looking through a telescope."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A child is hamming hits." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
People watching a movie can not watch as a race car screeches through a turn.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "A race car screeches through a turn as spectators watch." that "The people are watching a movie."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no
The biker can be either riding through the woods or through the busy city streets.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A mountain biker riding through the woods."
Hypothesis: "The mountain biker is riding through the busy city streets."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
Climbing is not necessarily the same as rock climbing. The woman may not be a fit brunette. Sweating it out doesn't imply enjoying.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: If "Fit brunette enjoys some time rock climbing." does that mean that "A woman sweating it out while climbing."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
Kids cannot be in a sandbox if they are jumping into a swimming pool.
The question and answer are below.
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A group of kids jumping into a swimming pool."
Hypothesis: "Kids are in a sandbox."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no
Just because a man makes a sandwich doesn't imply the sandwich is for his wife.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A man is making some sort of sandwich."
Hypothesis: "The man is making a sandwich for his wife."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
it is not possible to tell