Question: Sentence A: As an alternative to my approach, in which the growth in Holocaust memory is to be explained by the contemporary purposes it serves, you suggest a focus on the Jewish tradition of remembering catastrophes.

Sentence B: Our approaches to the Holocaust memory are very different.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: and some well it's like the the Dale Hansen on channel eight little is a sometimes a little too cutesy but i wonder if we're coming up on ten minutes have you talked have you been on the conversation when they beeped you at ten minutes
Channel 8 is a little too cutsey.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
The guide's appendixes augment these areas by citing applicable statutes (app.

Here is a hypothesis:
The guide augments these areas with laws.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: It was more of a limo, actually.

Sentence 2: In reality, it was more of a limo.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
During the first time period analyzed (through the end of 2005), EPA projects that a large number of SCR's will be installed to meet the requirements of the NOX SIP Call.

Does it follow that "Nox Sip Call will oversee the installments of SCR's."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "San'doro spun low and threw one of the daggers twirling end over end.", can we conclude that "San'doro ducked and flung one of the daggers."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes