Question:
Based on the premise "As we have pointed out, [i]t does not follow . . . that viewpoint-based restrictions are proper when the [government] does not itself speak or subsidize transmittal of a message it favors but instead expends funds to encourage a diversity of views from private speakers.", can we conclude that "Restrictions are appropriate when the government does not speak of the transmittal of a message it favors. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: The authentic FWI dances originated with the African slaves.

Sentence B: The original FWI dances started out in Africa.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: I shall spend a few months in a quiet sanatorium, my mental health will improve, the doctors will declare me sane again, and all will end happily for little Julius.
If I go to the sanatorium I will be tortured and restrained until my death.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
I am 25 and have one criminal conviction for hacking, a bad credit history, and some failed personal and professional relationships.

Here is a hypothesis:
I still owe the bank a huge sum of money.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Safire notes that Steve and Cokie Roberts were there too, facts confirmed by the husband-and-wife team on CNN's Late Edition and This Week , respectively.

Sentence 2: Steve and Cokie Roberts never go anywhere without eachother.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"ye ah i imagine it's really competitive"
Hypothesis: I can imagine that it's really competitive.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes