TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
PROBLEM: Comment: Imagine allowing terrorists cancel the I-phone over concerns it could cause cancer. We would not know the advantages and we could never learn if it is possible to mitigate the disadvantages.

It is too bad these self-righteous terrorists feel they need to shut down education because of fear. Possibly they could open their minds, shut their hate speech and participate in learning.

Nah, this is the time of Progressive Terrorists. We don't need no stink'n Constitution or fairness for all.

SOLUTION: Non-threat

PROBLEM: Comment: Of your list I would pick Iraq's non-existent 'Weapons of Mass Destruction' which was a failure of the MSM to expose the lie even though there was well-known evidence to the contrary including the testimony of the U.N.'s Hans Blix and expatriate Iraqi scientists. The other items on your list are not subject to MSM fake news.

SOLUTION: Non-threat

PROBLEM: Comment: I have to say Rep. Pramila Jayapal is just a drama queen and if that comment hurts her feelings, then clearly she is not cut out for her job in DC. Let's take the comment in context. If she had actually read the Exec Order, she would have known it had zero to do with religion. Maybe Saudi or Venezuela should be included but all the six countries that are listed are dirty and supportive in regards to terror. If they want off the list they know what they need to do. Has ZERO to do with religion. The Democrat narrative makes it about religion. Like many Seattle, liberal people, highly educated but not necessarily smart.

Bill O'Reilly is a jerk and his Waters comment was unbecoming. I think it is time for the Factor to take a hike.

SOLUTION:
Non-threat