Question:
Based on the premise "Downtown casinos are a bit more flexible when it comes to house rules, offering lower minimums and higher (sometimes no) limits.", can we conclude that "The house rules in the casinos downtown are more lax."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: The first Roman town in Gaul (a citadel and spa founded in 125 b.c. as Aquae Sextiae), Aix-en-Provence today is elegant and cultured, charming and cheerful.

Sentence B: Aix-en-Provence was the last town ever built by Romans in Gaul.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: It is not yet clear how Congress and the president can squeeze all the tax goodies each insists upon into a $135 billion bag (and come up with an honest $50 billion in new revenues to bring the net price down to $85 billion).
Congress and the president may have over promised what they can offer with 135 billion dollars.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
In any case what do you lose?

Here is a hypothesis:
What do you gain?

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: From you, perhaps, said Tyroid, a thin man with a few wisps of gray hair on his bald scalp.

Sentence 2: Tyroid had a full head of hair.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"It's probably safe to say Clinton's real feelings for Lewinsky actually go in another direction; see the Anne Boleyn theory, above.)"
Hypothesis: Clinton has alternate feelings for Lewinsky.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes