instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: Here is another one that doesn't care to check data or present proof. Isn't it time we demand from these charlatans the good-old obligation of no lying?
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit

question:
Comment: The assertion by self_reliance about unions at United is, of course, ridiculous. United has had unions for decades and many of those decades included superb service from United. It is, as always, a crisis of leadership. When things go bad, organizationally, then it is a leadership issue, pure and simple.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit

question:
Comment: It is no longer shocking that a priest/bishop who facilitates the raping of children by priests and bishops would be accused of sexual abuse. Is there a difference between priests/bishops who rape children and priests/bishops who remain silent or pass them around? And this particular bishop is a hit and run bishop who left a man dead on the side of the road. Bishop Thomas should be counting his lucky stars that he's escaped prison thus far.

AW
answer:
Sexual-explicit