Q: If The increase in citizenship applications has led to longer processing periods and, according to critics, to some immigrants being wrongly naturalized., can we say that "According to critics, all immigrants should be naturalized. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"So if the stock market is overvalued, what should the Fed do?"
Hypothesis: What should Fred do if the stock market holds more value than its worth?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: The key thing about Story No. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The least relevant thing about Story No."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "In order to provide a consistent frame of reference for discussing federal fiscal policy issues, this section refers to the unified budget measure unless otherwise specified.", can we conclude that "The unified budget measure is not an accurate way to analyze specific federal fiscal policy issues."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: you know and they're not going to let you see what they don't want you to see

Sentence B: You're going to be able to see everything.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Sentence A: Agricultural employers have consistently asserted that many U.S. workers did not want to work in seasonal agriculture or live in rural areas, and that crops would rot in the fields without foreign workers.

Sentence B: Agricultural employers stated that crops would rot without foreign workers.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes