Question:
Based on the premise "Special Report to the Health Effects Institute, Cambridge MA, July 2000", can we conclude that "The special report was publishes in the 80s"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Alternatively, an interpretation of the presence requirement that required H-2A workers to be present in the United States throughout the course of the representation would eviscerate their right to legal representation altogether.

Sentence B: An interpretation of the presences requirement that required H-2A workers to be present would be detrimental to their representation.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: The general massacre of Protestants spread to the countryside, and by October another 30,000 had lost their lives.
This was a move to force a different religion onto them.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
_Who_ were dead.

Here is a hypothesis:
Who were dead.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: It was purple with rage, and the veins stood out on the forehead.

Sentence 2: It was in a pleasant mood all day.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"But with a foot in so many camps past and present, east and west, religious and secular Egypt should be well-placed to withstand the vagaries of modern life and grow in wealth and influence in the coming years."
Hypothesis: With a foot in so many camps today and yesterday, east and west.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes