In this task, you need to write an incorrect answer to the given question. Along with the question, you are also given the correct answer(s) and the associated paragraph. An incorrect answer should be closely related to the content of the paragraph and/or the question but will not truthfully answer the question. Your incorrect answers should be similar to the given correct answer such that it will pose a challenge for students to distinguish the two. A good incorrect answer should prevent those who skip the paragraph from answering the question. The incorrect answer should not be trivial, in the sense that they should not be easily eliminated without reading the paragraph.

Input: Consider Input: Paragraph- Sent 1: The side of Malaquez's parcel gave way to reveal a greenmunk caught in a sheen of solid air.
Sent 2: Bits of leaf mold flew from under his feet as he ran to greet a friend or a bringer of food.
Sent 3: Tasha oohed in awe.
Sent 4: I said, "Frodo's been visiting you, eh?"Sent 5: Malaquez said, "Your pet?"Sent 6: "Hardly.
Sent 7: He lives around here somewhere.
Sent 8: I suppose he was attracted to the commotion up the hill."Sent 9: "Ah," Malaquez said.
Sent 10: "Why 'Frodo'?"Sent 11: Tasha said, "A little fellow with big, furry feet.
Sent 12: What else could he be called?"Sent 13: She handed the sculpture to me.
Sent 14: I almost dropped it; I expected it to weigh no more than a holo.
Sent 15: "Heavy," I said, as if he might not have known.
Sent 16: He laughed.
Sent 17: "My last piece was of four old Undersiders crouched around a trash fire.
Sent 18: Be glad someone didn't toss that to you."Sent 19: He spoke of his art with the enthusiasm of a seven-year-old.
Sent 20: "Um, I should wait to importune you, but...".
Question: Where does Frodo get his name?.

Output: White colour.

Input: Consider Input: Paragraph- Sent 1: Her career started more than 20 years ago in a garage behind a Catholic Worker soup kitchen on skid row in Los Angeles.
Sent 2: She lived on a $3-a-week stipend that she spent on pantyhose and bus fare.
Sent 3: Her law practice grew to an organization that brought in millions of dollars of damages through its cases against L.A. slumlords, allowing poor families to set up college funds and buy homes.
Sent 4: In all those years, she never lost a case.
Sent 5: When she stepped down, she had time to notice what was happening to the field of poverty law.
Sent 6: "I realized with a shock that the work had really disintegrated and we had lost a whole generation of public-interest lawyers," she said.
Sent 7: "It had gone from being an economic sacrifice as it was in my day to an economic impossibility.
Sent 8: ... The whole system has essentially collapsed."Sent 9: Mintie also started to ask questions about the medical field.
Sent 10: Almost every person who walks into a free medical clinic, she said, faces some legal problem such as an eviction or the loss of Social Security benefits.
Sent 11: And many of her clients had medical problems from living in slum housing such as cockroaches lodged in ear canals and rat bite fever, a nonfatal malady that particularly affects children.
Sent 12: Mintie noticed that health-care professionals were graduating with staggering debts and also couldn't afford to work with the poor.
Sent 13: Her work was noticed by Oprah Winfrey, who invited her on the TV show March 26, 2001.
Sent 14: Mintie received a $100,000 "Use Your Life Award" from Oprah's Angel Network, a nonprofit organization that awards money to those who help others.
Sent 15: Mintie said that all of the money has gone to her recipients -- none was spent on overhead.
Sent 16: She will be out of funds by spring.
Sent 17: She is trying to get religious organizations to sponsor recipients.
Sent 18: It is a secular organization, but one that grew out of Mintie's religious convictions.
Question: How many years did Mintie go without losing a case?.

Output: 2 years.

Input: Consider Input: Paragraph- Sent 1: Appended to the last book, however, is a self-contained essay on aesthetics, which Durer worked on between 1512 and 1528, and it is here that we learn of his theories concerning 'ideal beauty'.
Sent 2: Durer rejected Alberti's concept of an objective beauty, proposing a relativist notion of beauty based on variety.
Sent 3: Nonetheless, Durer still believed that truth was hidden within nature, and that there were rules which ordered beauty, even though he found it difficult to define the criteria for such a code.
Sent 4: In 1512/13 his three criteria were function ('Nutz'), naive approval ('Wohlgefallen') and the happy medium ('Mittelmass').
Sent 5: However, unlike Alberti and Leonardo, Durer was most troubled by understanding not just the abstract notions of beauty but also as to how an artist can create beautiful images.
Sent 6: Between 1512 and the final draft in 1528, Durer's belief developed from an understanding of human creativity as spontaneous or inspired to a concept of 'selective inward synthesis'.
Sent 7: In other words, that an artist builds on a wealth of visual experiences in order to imagine beautiful things.
Sent 8: Durer's belief in the abilities of a single artist over inspiration prompted him to assert that "one man may sketch something with his pen on half a sheet of paper in one day, or may cut it into a tiny piece of wood with his little iron, and it turns out to be better and more artistic than another's work at which its author labours with the utmost diligence for a whole year.".
Question: What was Durer's concept of 'selective inward synthesis?'.
Output: Durer's belief in the abilities of a single artist over inspiration.