In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: "Non-PC speak"; right. Like "campaign device" is really right wing spin speak for "huge lie to convince Trump supporters to vote for him." And "pussy grabbing" is "just locker room talk" heard in no real locker room, ever. How do you define hate speech? I mean, what do the words faggot and nigger and kike and wop, slit, etc mean to you?

Answer: Obscene

Question: Comment: The authors of the JJ report insist that homosexuality played no role in the abuse crisis, but their own data undermine this conclusion. For example, they plainly admit that "81% of the victims [between 1950 and 2002] were male," and that 78% were post-pubescent.

So if the abusers weren't pedophiles, and the victims were mostly adolescent males, wouldn't that make the victimizers homosexuals?

What else could we possibly be talking about if not homosexuality?

Why can't you answer this question?

Answer: Non-obscene

Question: Comment: "immiserate": transitive verb, meaning to make miserable.

Darn those Chinese and their inscrutable justice system! Imagine making accused spies feel miserable. You'd never see America or Canada doing that.

Answer:
Obscene