input question: As Lost in the Funhouse notes, Kaufman actually joined Lawler on the professional circuit and traveled across the country in a kind of touring carnival. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Kaufman and Lawler were on CNN together every week."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "To our youngest players, the title of Thursday's question may be as ancient and obscure as Edgar Bergen's wacky catch I'm a ventriloquist on the radio, suckers!", can we conclude that "To our oldest players, the title of Thursday's question may be new and popular."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Federal agencies are feeling the pressure to demonstrate that they are putting the taxpayers' money to sound use.

Sentence B: The federal agencies need to increase their spending.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: The techniques for ensuring sufficient comparability and quality and for aggregating the information are what constitute the cumulative part of the methodology.
The information needs to be aggregated to really become useful.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
It is supported by good science and good economics, as well as by good intentions.

Here is a hypothesis:
There's no science that supports it.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
The Ditch Is Back

Does it follow that "The ditch has fallen out of favor."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no