[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Young tennis player is in action hitting a tennis ball with her racket."
Hypothesis: "Tennis player is playing tennis."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A tennis player hitting a tennis ball is a rephrasing of a tennis player playing tennis.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "People eating at a long table full of food and drink." can we conclude that "Thanksgiving dinner was a big event at my grandmother's house."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Their are many reasons people would eat at a table full of food and drink not only for thanksgiving and there is no mention of the location being a grandmother's house.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man stands next to a pillar near water."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The pillar is made of water." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Man is a living thing while pillar is non living thing.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A woman looking at food trying to decide what she wants to buy." can we conclude that "The woman is looking at panda bears."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The woman can't be looking at food and looking at panda bears at the same time.
The answer is no.