Teacher:Given a text, write a compressed version of it in a single sentence.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: While the judicial proponents of freedom continue to hold the upper hand on free speech, the reigning approach to freedom of religion underscores the even-handedness of the law-the same rules should apply to religious and nonreligious alike. In 1990, in Oregon v.
Student:
The judicial proponents of freedom hold the upper hand on free speech while freedom of religion underscores the even-handedness of the law. Religious and nonreligious rules should be equal.