Question: Sentence A: If the fact will not fit the theory, let the theory go."

Sentence B: We must not waste time on theories that are no longer correct.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: New Cool and cloudy but no rain.
Windy and dark, without rain.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
On a broader level, conferees agreed that we must work to ensure that both individual state justice communities and the broader national counterpart becomes more diverse, inclusive and multiculturally competent.

Here is a hypothesis:
Conferees said we have to work to make sure the community is diverse and accepting of immigrants and refugees.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Yet I was a little chary of doing so.

Sentence 2: I was wary of doing so.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
FEMA and VBA were selected because a literature review of relevant articles indicated that front-line employees from those agencies had been empowered or involved in key agency decisions or operations.

Does it follow that "FEMA and VBA were picked because the literature review found front-line employees were involved in decision making."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "As most laws vary state-by-state, queries from out-of-state used to meet a dead end.", can we conclude that "In state queries usually get to a dead end. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no