Question: "We're going to move," Jimmy said to Mr. James,her teacher, with tears in her eyes. "Dad lost his job and now we don't have enough money to live in our house." Pam was walking by and just heard Jimmy's talk with Mr.James. In the lunchroom Pam met Carol and said, "I've got something to tell you about Jimmy." As she started to tell Carol about Jimmy's dad, several other classmates stopped to listen. Pam felt bad telling what she had heard but she went on anyway. After school, Pam saw some of her classmates talking to Jimmy. "Where does your dad work?" one of the boys asked. Jimmy's face turned red. She left without answering. Pam felt terrible, because she didn't mean to hurt Jimmy. And she hadn't thought that some of the classmates would make jokes and laugh at Jimmy about her father's losing the job. Pam didn't know what she could do to help Jimmy. 1. Who was mobing
2. Why?
3. who did his teacher tell?
4. Who was the girl who overheard?
5. Who did Pam tell?
6. what did a boy ask Jimmy?
7. What did Jimmy feel like after that?
8. was there anyway Pam could help Jimmy
9. Where did Pam talk to Caro Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers: 1. Jimmy
2. his dad lost his job
3. no one
4. Pam
5. Carol
6. "Where does your dad work?"
7. embarrassed
8. no
9. In the lunchroom

Question: CHAPTER VIII

KIPPS ENTERS SOCIETY

1

Submission to Inexorable Fate took Kipps to the Anagram Tea.

At any rate he would meet Helen there in the presence of other people and be able to carry off the worst of the difficulty of explaining his little jaunt to London. He had not seen her since his last portentous visit to New Romney. He was engaged to her, he would have to marry her, and the sooner he faced her again the better. Before wild plans of turning socialist, defying the world and repudiating all calling for ever, his heart on second thoughts sank. He felt Helen would never permit anything of the sort. As for the Anagrams he could do no more than his best and that he was resolved to do. What had happened at the Royal Grand, what had happened at New Romney, he must bury in his memory and begin again at the reconstruction of his social position. Ann, Buggins, Chitterlow, all these, seen in the matter-of-fact light of the Folkestone train, stood just as they stood before; people of an inferior social position who had to be eliminated from his world. It was a bother about Ann, a bother and a pity. His mind rested so for a space on Ann until the memory of these Anagrams drew him away. If he could see Coote that evening he might, he thought, be able to arrange some sort of connivance about the Anagrams, and his mind was chiefly busy sketching proposals for such an arrangement. It would not, of course, be ungentlemanly cheating, but only a little mystification. Coote very probably might drop him a hint of the solution of one or two of the things, not enough to win a prize, but enough to cover his shame. Or failing that he might take a humorous, quizzical line and pretend he was pretending to be very stupid. There were plenty of ways out of it if one kept a sharp lookout.... 1. Who is Kipps engaged to?
2. Has it been a while since he saw her?
3. When was it?
4. Where will he see her?
5. What kind of occasion is it?
6. Does he need to explain something to her?
7. What?
8. Does he think it will be easy?
9. What is he going to start restoring?
10. Who is in a lower class than him?
11. What should happen to people like that?
12. Why?
13. What was he planning to become?
14. What didn't he?
15. Who is he hoping to see tonight?
16. What help does he think he might get?
17. Can he help him with a solution?
18. Is he proud?
19. Are there a lot of options?
20. what might he pretend? Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers: 1. Helen
2. yes
3. unknown
4. in the presence of other people
5. an anagram contest
6. yes
7. little jaunt to London.
8. no
9. his social position.
10. Ann, Buggins, Chitterlow,
11. they had to be eliminated from his world.
12. unknown
13. a socialist,
14. Helen would never permit anything of the sort
15. Coote
16. some sort of connivance about the Anagrams
17. yes
18. yes
19. yes
20. to pretend he was pretending to be very stupid.

Question: Washington (CNN) -- President Barack Obama's assertion of executive privilege ahead of a hearing before a House committee, which subsequently recommended his attorney general be cited for contempt of Congress, sets up a fight that has had mixed results in the past.

At stake are Justice Department documents relating to the flawed Fast and Furious gunrunning sting that House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-California, wants in his hands, and that Attorney General Eric Holder says are confidential.

The White House move means the Department of Justice can withhold the documents from the committee, which recommended by a 23-17 vote Wednesday that Holder be cited for contempt.

The full House is expected to consider the motion next week.

More details: House panel recommends contempt citation

If it votes to issue a contempt citation, a statement of facts would be delivered to the U.S. Attorney in the District of Columbia, "whose duty it shall be to bring the matter before the grand jury for its action," according to the law governing contempt citations.

Executive privilege also has been around since the earliest days of the country, and gives the executive branch the ability to withhold certain internal discussions and documents from scrutiny.

"It's there to give the executive branch some breathing room for its own deliberations," said Josh Chafetz, professor of law at Cornell Law School.

Executive privilege "has a long history, but it often plays out very differently," he said.

The last major confrontation over executive privilege also involved the Justice Department, but the partisan roles were reversed. 1. What the AG had done?
2. Who would have been hearing the case?
3. When?
4. Who was the AG?
5. Was the president supporting him?
6. What privilege he would exercise?
7. Did this work before?
8. Where the statement of facts would be sent?
9. in which district?
10. Where the attorney would send the matter then?
11. Which law stipulates all these?
12. Is executive privilege a new matter in the country?
13. From when we can trace it?
14. What power it gives to the executive branch?
15. What was the last such confrontation?
16. Was President Obama's party involved?
17. What sting is in question this time?
18. Who wanted the info?
19. Did the AG agree?
20. At the end did DOJ have to give the info away? Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers:
1. contempt of Congress,
2. The full House
3. next week.
4. Eric Holder
5. Yes
6. executive privilege
7. Yes
8. to the U.S. Attorney
9. District of Columbia,
10. to the grand jury
11. the law governing contempt citations.
12. No
13. since the earliest days of the country,
14. the ability to withhold certain internal discussions and documents from scrutiny.
15. also involved the Justice Department,
16. No
17. the flawed Fast and Furious gunrunning sting
18. Darrell Issa
19. No
20. unknown