Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

Example Input: CONTEXT: This irks me too, but I'm certain it's done to convey to the audience that the character is actually drinking. It's one of those tropes that people have become accustomed to, even though it isn't realistic. It's similar to the trope of "every time you turn on a microphone, it whines with feedback for a second, then settles down." Not realistic, but it clearly shows the audience what's going on. <sep> Q: Why does TV shows always make a full drink sound like an almost empty one? A: done to convey to the audience that the character is actually drinking Q: Is it a good technique? A: This irks me Q: Is it realistic? A: it isn't realistic <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why do, they use this technique?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: CONTEXT: I bet it had something to do with her consciousness never really disappearing. My interpretation is that, in the movie, bodies are mortal. They die. But a person's consciousness, their awareness and ability to interact with the physical universe, is timeless and is not tied to the mortal body they inhabit for a while. (That's just my guess. The movie was pretty trippy and didn't explain everything fully.) <sep> Q: What did Lucy mean by "We never really die"? A: I bet it had something to do with her consciousness never really disappearing Q: Did Lucy become immortal? A: a person's consciousness, their awareness and ability to interact with the physical universe, is timeless and is not tied to the mortal body they inhabit for a while <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So is that what happened when Lucy's brain usability got to 100% or something?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: CONTEXT: They get affected by lightning just like anyone else would be - they're still human (ok, metahuman). The lightning strike PLUS the dark matter released by the particle accelerator explosion is what turned Barry into the Flash and gave him access to the Speed Force. As we've seen before with other metas who harness electrical powers, Barry can still take an electrical hit and be hurt by it, and lightning is just a large electrical charge. So in summary, yes - if he's hit by lightning it's perfectly understandable that his heart might be stopped by it. <sep> Q: Why does lightning hit affects speedsters? A: As we've seen before with other metas who harness electrical powers, Barry can still take an electrical hit and be hurt by it, and lightning is just a large electrical charge Q: How would an injured Flash be resuscitated if they were struck by lightening ? A: They get affected by lightning just like anyone else would be - they're still human (ok, metahuman <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How many seasons of the Flash TV show are there?
Example Output:
No