Question:
Based on the premise "Reno has apparently construed this ambiguous provision in the only way one sensibly can.", can we conclude that "Reno construed an ambiguous provision in the most sensible way possible."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: uh particularly solicit you know soliciting so having your and i know that a lot of these of course are random phone calls they just you know start going through the phone book or going through a series of numbers

Sentence B: The solicitation calls you are making are not random.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: well the uh the time we were there at the warehouse we felt really bad because we had uh another person coming from Washington our outside counsel and she was told that we were gonna be in a warehouse but she really didn't get the idea that we were in the warehouse part of the warehouse not the office to the warehouse but the warehouse
We were having lunch when the outside counsel arrived and were not even in the warehouse building at all.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
FGD installation plans and experience have been extensive in the U.S. and abroad.

Here is a hypothesis:
The plans were simple in the US.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: The distinctive sound of the cicada chirps through the heat of the day.

Sentence 2: It is easy to identify the cicada by its unique sound.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"Suppose a potential competitor needed a critical mass in order to begin operations."
Hypothesis: A potential competitor may need a critical mass in order to start operating.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes