Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Buying Northern Dynasty stock back is definitely a better deal than providing tax credits for big oil. Tax credits for oil exploration in the Inlet will never ever pay off. Who knows what Pebble could be in a hundred years. It might be like having Prudhoe in the bank all over again. Right now Alaska could buy it back for a small fraction of the money invested. We could have bought it back many times for the money wasted studying the gas line. We could buy in back many times for what we are wasting in oil tax credits.
[A]: No

[Q]: And I eat Wendy's twice a week and have a pro-grade cardiovascular system.

Genetics, circumstance, and moderation all matter, but by all means keep body-shaming people, hand-waving, and equating it somehow to the existence of fast food.
[A]: No

[Q]: Maybe it's closing cause he put trump signs up in the place. As soon as I saw the trump stickers on the fridges I instantly lost respect. I don't like to give my money to people that support a xenophobic, racist, selfish, asshole.
[A]:
Yes