You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Solution: Yes
Why? The comment suggests threat against Trump and his agendas and classified as threatening. Hence, it is a positive example

New input: I have lived in Alaska almost 30 years. I think all responsible users are NOT "toking and driving" - just as responsible drinkers do not "drink and drive." Those who don't honor the law or principles of ethics are certainly not 'moral' in the sense I mean, and you should not have written they are among 'the most moral people' you know. Surely we must express disapproval of unsafe driving, as an absolute minimum. And maybe we should rethink legalization - if it going to make access easier to a significant population which won't behave well. As well as rethinking making the penalty for bad behavior merely a fine - which is the new proposed code. Sounds like those who have money and no sense are getting a 'get out of jail free card' until they actually kill someone.
Solution:
No