QUESTION: Dear Medicine Bow Shipper: We received notification that the 5th segment to gate valve 6 providing a total firm capacity of 495 Mdth/day was approved by FERC today. Based on the feedback some of you have provided today, and since this is late notice on a Friday afternoon, the contracts will be effective on Monday, October 29, but the capacity will be available tomorrow and Sunday. We filed the 6th segment to gate valve 5 this past Tuesday (October 23) and are prepared to file the final segment as soon as one currently being reviewed is approved. Please call me if you have any questions.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Medicine Bow Tie-In Capacity
Hi Sally, I hope this message finds you well. Just a short note to let you know that I have settled into my workspace at EB 3089F. I am very excited about my summer internship with Enron, and when you have a free moment, let me know; I would like to stop by and say "hi". Feel free to contact me at (713) 853-4750 or at michelle.yee@enron.com with any questions. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Have a great day, Michelle
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Summer Contact Information for M. Yee
I had a little bird put a word in my ear. Is there any possibility for Ben Raimer to be Bush's secretary of HHS? Just curious about that infamous UTMB rumor mill. Hope things are well, happy holidays. PL
Answer: New President
Here is an email: Beginning tomorrow this report will contain Inter-Continental Exchange (ICE) trade numbers and volumes, in addition to EOL and brokered deal information. Please look for that information at the beginning of the e-mail. Also note that the ICE data is released one day later, so it will not correlate directly to the EOL data below it. (i.e. Daily EOL Summary 3/1 will include ICE data from 2/28) Enjoy...
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Daily EOL Summary 2/28
Q: Darron, I am forwarding you 3 positions open at CMS Energy. Richard says that they are looking. I thought that you might know some EES people that were cut who were looking for jobs. I know that you have been here for a while. Let me know what you think. 1. gulf coast wholesale gas originator to create structured long term deals with LDCs, large industrials and municipals off the interstate pipes 2. Retail commercial / industrial power marketing manager/director to lead the charge into the Michigan and possibly other profitable retail electric markets 3. Retail power analyst to assess tariffs and cost/risk models ro support retail power sales
Propose a subject line
A: power positions
Here is an email: Meeting covered Market Power and Market Monitoring issues. First presenter was David Patton, from Potomac Economics. This firm has been jointly hired to provide technical support to SPP, MISO and Alliance. Many initial questions on what is market power, how can you define a well functioning market, etc. David envisions a market monitoring organization. If a problem emerges, it has to work with the RTO. IMM should not recommend power mitigation measures, but it should report any problems to FERC. It (has to go via FERC). General feeling is that Market Monitoring should be much more than market power, but to make sure that the market as a whole is functioning. It seems to me that the proposal is aligned with what Christi has advocated as part of the Southeast Mitigation. Multiple questions on how power market should be handled for must run, out of merit (constrained on and contrained off plants) and inflexible plants (e.g. hydro or take or pay gas contracts). Proposals to establish price caps were not accepted. Instead a proposal to deal with one or more generators with potential mkt power: they should have caps on bid prices. David proposed some market rules to deal with specific circumstances. It was generally accepted that demand side response should be used to mitigate market power. Other questions on how demand side bidding shold be operationalized (Mike: are there rules for DSB as part of the MISO Market Rules compendium?) Second Presenter - from WPPI. He raised serious concerns about potential market power in the region (Michigan Peninsula). Should utilities have approval to sell at market based rates? How should ATC be calculate to take into account counterflows? Issue is more pertinent until RTO enter into day 2 phase. Presenter's proposal, which faced a lot of resistance, was to assume that all Gs have market power, unless they prove otherwise (except must run agreements for reliability purposes). Roberto disagreed: this goes beyond MISO's authority. RTO has to work with IMM if market power is suspected. Dynegy requested David to further explore the situation of must run plants. David asked whether or not we had filed our position on MM for MISO. Mike: you may want to send him a copy, just as a courtesy. LM
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
MISO Meeting last week