In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Input: Consider Input: synopsis : original " jurassic park " survivor alan grant ( neill ) is tricked by paul and amanda kirby ( macy and leoni ) into leading an expedition to an island overrun by dinosaur , to rescue their stranded son .
grant 's team is picked off one by one as they encounter dinosaurs both new and familiar , and grant grows to realise that some breeds are more intelligent than he previously thought .
review : there is one reason why " jurassic park iii " is better than its immediate predecessor , " the lost world : jurassic park " .
the latter wasted 129 minutes of my life ;
the former , only 94 .
the first " park " was a marvellous film , full of awe - inspiring sights , interesting characters , and genuine thrills .
its two successors have been pale imitations , amounting to hundred - million - dollar b - grade horror movies .
at least this third entry realises it ; whereas " the lost world " tried to justify its existence with a ludicrous and overextended plot , " jurassic park iii " simply sticks its characters on an island with a bunch of dinosaurs and lets the mayhem begin .
there is a desperate sense of deja vu presiding over this movie ; the computer - animated dinos are no longer novel or exciting , and even the first - time presence of aerial lizards scarcely improves the situation .
remember that wondrous first trolley ride through the park in the original movie ?
nothing in this rehash even comes close .
add in execrable dialogue from screenwriters buchman , payne and taylor , and phoned - in performances by the normally capable macy and leoni , and
it is difficult to recommend the film to anyone but dino enthusiasts .
at least neill makes some effort to retain the dignity of his character , and there is much less gore than in " the lost world " , making this installment more suitable for children .

Output: N

Input: Consider Input: plot : a rich guy who does n't believe in love , orders a mail - order bride for himself .
that very evening , the couple is married and fall madly in love soon thereafter .
but what 's this ?
one of them might not be the person they are pretending to be ?
wow . . .
a sin , indeed .
critique : easily
one of the worst movies that i 've seen all year .
too long , too boring , too predictable and too ridiculous for anyone interested in watching a good movie .
what the hell were they thinking when they made this thing ?
( it 's no wonder that the film has been sitting on the racks for about a year ) this felt like a really bad tv movie of the week , with some nudity stuffed in from time to time , just to wake up the audience .
have you ever switched channels and fallen upon one of those ridiculously melodramatic tv movies , one that you just could n't help but switch back to from time to time , just to make sure that it was n't part of some sick joke ?
well , this movie is exactly like that , only it is n't a joke , it is n't on tv
and you are asked to pay money to see it ! !
i say again . . .
what the shite were they thinking ?
okay , so where do i start ?
first of all , the trailer of this film gives away the movie 's main plot twist , the betrayal .
so for the first half hour of the film , you 're basically just sitting there , watching these two " lovers " go through the motions until the " betrayal " occurs .
whoopee , big surprise .
second of all , angelina jolie is horribly miscast in this part .
why ?
well , it 's like this : not for one second
do you ever believe that she is not a nasty backstabbing woman !
i mean , it 's like all of those people who complained about jack nicholson being psycho from the start of the shining , well , the same goes here .
every look in jolie 's eyes screams " psycho " !
then of course , you have the case of the " patsy " husband , a man who just ca n't seem to figure out anything in time .
i mean . . .
how boring is that for the audience ?
you 're watching this guy screw up time after time after time , and somehow , we 're supposed to feel sorry or care about this dude .
no , thanks !
and if we do n't care about him , and we really do n't care about her ( she 's a beeyatch and as confused as we are about her actual motivations in the film ) , who the hell are we supposed to care about in this film ?
well , i 'll tell you .
the only thing that i was worrying about the whole way through this picture was whether or not i 'd actually fall asleep before the end credits rolled .
no suspense , no chemistry between the leads , no real love or passion , no sense of surprise , plenty of plot holes for everyone and an extra moronic ending
.
so why am i even giving this film a rating of three points ?
well , it 's actually pretty simple .
i liked the locations in the movie and the groovy score , but my primary reason for slipping three notches onto this bedpost is for the gratuitous shots of jolie 's boobies ( that 's two points right there ! )
and another one for antonio 's ass ( hairless , just for the record ) .
everything else in this movie was pointless , boring and just plain stupid .
try imagining a soft - porn movie .
. .
but without the plot !
that 's pretty much what you 've got here .
a low point in the careers of both stars .
oops , i almost forgot to mention the crappy dialogue . .
.
god
oh mighty . .
. make it stop ! !
where 's joblo coming from ?
american psycho ( 9/10 ) - cruel intentions ( 8/10 ) - eyes wide shut ( 6/10 ) - fatal attraction ( 8/10 ) -
playing by heart ( 7/10 ) - under suspicion ( 7/10 ) - what lies beneath ( 8/10 ) - what women want ( 4/10 ) - whipped ( 7/10 )

Output: N

Input: Consider Input: this is a film that i was inclined to like at the outset : the two main characters had been involved with the fine television drama st .
elsewhere for several years , and i had understood that the director / screenwriter had written for the show on occasion also .
i am sorry to report that the results were not up to my expectations , nor were they satisfactory .
if i had to list a reason why . .
. .
but that would be getting ahead of myself ; besides , it 's not immediately clear , as there are so many problems with the film .
adam arkin plays a grade - school teacher who is sardonic , cynical , and somewhat abrasive , but a good teacher .
he spends his lunches playing basketball by himself on a nearby court .
one day , he meets a drifter ( david morse , who plays jack morrison on st .
elsewhere ) in the park , and inveigles him in a game of one - on - one basketball .
morse turns out to be good , and a friendship slowly develops between the two , as their respective professions progress on the screen -- arkin 's teaching , and morse 's selling of paper flowers to passing motorists .
so far , my major complaint would be the lack of dialogue , and the constant intrusion of the musical soundtrack .
good music to be sure , but it does n't replace the dialogue for setting the mood or telling the story
-- it makes the film somewhat minimalistic , a technique i rarely admire
.
suddenly their friendship is interrupted by morse 's introduction to a fellow teacher of arkin 's
, a woman arkin has long admired from afar , but it too reticent to approach .
it appears that she begins to admire morse ( who enjoys here attentions , but is n't sure what to do about it -- she does n't realize that he is a drifter , and knows nothing about his past ) , and this causes friction between arkin and almost everyone else .
until then , i had only a vague dissatisfaction with the film .
the conclusion is where it begins to evolve into a full - fledged failure .
the woman , at least to me , appeared to be fairly shallow ; i did n't realize how shallow until her final scene with arkin , where she reveals that she has been trying to make arkin jealous by her attentions to morse .
somehow , this is made to appear as if it is arkin 's fault , and it is left with him feeling somehow victorious that he 's gotten such a find of girlfriend .
frankly , dropping her on the spot would have seemed the most civilized action arkin could make ; punching her in the mouth not the least . after this , the childish confrontation between morse and arkin at the end seems almost natural . if i had to summarize a major gripe
, it 's that this is a story spread too thin , that creates semi - likable characters at the outset , and then suddenly jerks them into being 16-year - olds at the last moment .
it might be true - to - life with some people ; but that does n't mean
* i
* have to like it .
i do n't . .
avoid .
Output: N