input question: Select the correct sentiment of the following review: This is probably one of the worst movies I have ever seen, everything about it is weak and incoherent. The acting is absurd, the costumes even crummier and the story is non-existent. This 'poverty row' sword and adventure film was meant to capture some of the success that "Beastmaster" and "Conan" enjoyed but it doesn't give us any reason to follow along. The lead character is tepid and dull, he can't even fight with a sword and the sword is from the 16th Century. All the action sequences are like that, slow and unrealistic, not to mention the castle and the horribly dated music playing whenever they are riding a horse. Don't even bother with this crap.
....
output answer: negative

input question: Select the correct sentiment of the following review: A question for you : A family go to a new house and get stalked by demonic forces . Which film am I talking about ? Every horror film you've seen ? Yes that's true but that's not the answer I'm looking for . I'll narrow it down by saying there's a lot of teen angst scenes . Doesn't help ? Well there's lots of bits where the characters are stalked by a creature and you see the characters through the creature's POV . No futher forward ? Okay there's a dream sequence involving lots of blood ? Could still be any horror film you say . Oh gawd this could take weeks so I'll say the film I'm talking about features loads of Aussies many of whom have appeared in NEIGHBOURS and HOME AND AWAY . Yes that's right the film is THE THIRD CIRCLE ( aka CUBBYHOUSE ) and do you understand what the above exercise is about ? It's about me pointing out how THE THIRD CIRCLE is absolutely no different from any horror film that's been made
....
output answer: negative

input question: Select the correct sentiment of the following review: I just went to a screening of the film during Expresion en Corto, a short film festival in Guanajuato, Mexico. One of the producers was there and gave a brief introduction. The Film rolled and from the first shot I was amazed: one long continuous shot of a futuristic Paris in glorious black and white.

I shouldn't go on with the details 'cause I think it is a film worth seeing. The sci-fi story might be found average for many... to me was really good. The action is great, the camera is free to fly everywhere and I mean everywhere. Things you would not be able to do or see is accomplished beautifully. The cast performance is good, in my opinion no one hits the wrong note.

Now, the thing that I found awesome is the animation. 3D grafics look 2D. A BW comic book brought to life. The details on the backgrounds gives more texture as if it had been done by hand (I'm sure it was but when the angles change you see the depth).

The producer at the screening talked about the hard work behind the film: 7 years! The director, she said, is brilliant, but perhaps he was quite unexperienced since he only had one short film in his CV. So, many people had true faith in them. They started their own studio from scratch and ever since they faced the challenge they brought upon them.

Don't miss it. I think you won't regret it... maybe Richard Linklater for the final look of this film is superior to his I think.
....
output answer:
positive