Problem: Pole<br>The man drove into a pole. He told the cops he hadn't seen it. The cops gave him a sobriety test. The man did not pass it. The man got a ticket.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The man said he saw the pole before he hit it."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: No

Problem: So how do I make it better? Well, we provided an affidavit, and that affidavit indicated that we, if called upon to testify, would validate the authenticity of the articles that were written. We did that, in effect, to offer to both sides so that we wouldn't otherwise have to testify. Accepted by the plaintiffs, not accepted by the defendants. Defendants wanted to have the right of cross-examination.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The affadavit is for a crime of passion"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: It's impossible to say

Problem: Hinostroza's children told police that four hooded individuals broke into the house and shot their mother after having insulted her.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The four hooded individuals spoke with British accents."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A:
It's impossible to say