We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: Doesn't hold together, though - you have no evidence that criminal arms supply is unaffected by gun control.
Sent2: Gun control in the U.S. does not equal crime control.
[A]: Not similar

[Q]: Sent1: Gun registration schemes have been disabled for criminals because requiring them to register a gun they are forbidden to own would violate their 5th Amendment rights.
Sent2: If England wants to ban weapons, that is quite alright, but we should not trade with htem as long as they are violating the human rights of their citizens.
[A]: Not similar

[Q]: Sent1: now imagine if no criminals could get hold of a gun, you wouldn't need a protection, as no criminals have guns.
Sent2: It is just a case of prevention, remove guns being so easily accessible and you then decrease the gun crime and remove the need for guns to defend yourself.
[A]:
Similar