Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
outsider, what a passive/aggressive way to drag your nefarious beliefs towards sexual assault into a story. and how telling ...this "murderess" had a male counterpart which you fail to mention. this child tragically died of starvation....not sexual assault. another fail for you

Ex Output:
Yes

Ex Input:
Because we need a legal mind to instand all the carefully worded inserts that have been used to steal tax credits. Juneau Republicans can not read. Except spot dotted line to sign! Everyone else will be like Randy "veco" Ruedrich! We have many in party still.

Ex Output:
No

Ex Input:
This mistake by Stewart goes to poor judgement and more attention to style than substance. His speech made a valid point about helping people in appropriate ways where they live, but he just couldn't resist repeating the story about fires and disappearing pets (perhaps not even true). I agree that Stewart is not qualified for any higher office, and possibly would not even be in the public eye if he were not part of one of the powerful families in the area.

Ex Output:
No