Question:
Based on the premise "wonder because football", can we conclude that "I don't think about it."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: In the 1890s, Theodor Herzl (1860 1904) worked to organize a movement, Zionism, to create a Jewish state.

Sentence B: Theodor Herzl worked with many other men and women toward this goal.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: 70 Annie wasn't best pleased.
Annie would stop them.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
The Times speculated that NATO officials leaked the bad news to persuade Congress not to pull out the troops.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Times claims NATO leaked bad news to persuade Congress in favor of their wish to not pull out troops.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Not an airtight argument (all anti-discrimination laws pick and choose among protected classes), but a cleverly textualist one--and one that seems to have helped convince a majority of the court to strike down the amendment, despite a lack of helpful precedent.

Sentence 2: The Court had always wanted to strike the amendment down and the textualist argument provided just the excuse to do so.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Care must be taken to distinguish between regular overtime and irregular overtime or occasional overtime (or compensatory time in lieu of overtime, where allowed) in order for the agency to properly document and calculate an employee's overtime pay entitlements under 5 U.S.C."
Hypothesis: You don't have to distinguish between regular and irregular and occasional overtime to document it appropriately.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no