Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Boo hoo, Hillary is so "uninspiring" and lord knows (infantile) Americans must be "inspired." The problem is the overactive and ideological imagination of the populace. Hillary Clinton will continue the policies of Barack Obama and if Americans find this state of affairs unsatisfactory they only have lack of political involvement and naivete to blame. Finally, the Republican party's backwardness is coming home to roost and what do we see? A bunch of ideological idiots on the so-called American "left" fantasizing that a country where fanatics shoot doctors and women seeking abortions is going to turn into a Sweden-style social democracy in the course of a single presidential election. Now is the finally the moment for the Democratic party to take over the political center (a strategic move for the future) and lo and behold the Sanders people have arrived to screw that up. Never underestimate the ability of Americans to shoot themselves in the foot.

A: Yes
****
Q: Show a picture of this piece of crap.

A: Yes
****
Q: "Francois...said school officials would do whatever they can to make students and staff feel safe at the high school on Monday. "

Shouldn't the focus be on actually making them safe every day, not on making them feel safe on Monday?

A:
No
****