Q: Premise: "Two hockey players are fighting with a referee watches."
Hypothesis: "The referee watches as the hockey player rights each other while drink a can of soda."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: The referee would not necessarily be drinking a can of soda.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "Three police officers conversing rollerblades." can we conclude that "Roller blade cops are at the board walk."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Police officers could be conversing rollerblades at many places and nothing implies that they are at the board walk.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Can we conclude from "Two construction workers are digging up pavement on a road." that "The two workers have been working on the road for months."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Digging up pavement does not imply having worked on the road for months.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A fire burns in a barrel on the concrete floor while a man stands on a platform of scaffolding."
Hypothesis: "The man is working on a construction project."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A:
The man may not be working. He may be simply observing. The site may not be a construction project. It could be a movie set or a fire training event.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.