instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
question:
Context: 'How are you today? Did you have any preferences on the supplies we will be trading?' 'I am good. How about yourself? I think I would like some firewood to start off with. We like to have bigger fires. What about you?'
Utterance: 'I am good as well. That is good to hear that you like to have bigger fires as we do not care much for that. We would much rather have some extra water.'
answer:
Yes

question:
Context: 'Alright. I have a feeling we will have a deal then. How about you give me two water for a firewood?' 'that sounds like a plan' 'how many firewood you need? Maybe we could also exchange one food for one more firewood?'
Utterance: 'I would appreciate that, I was thinking of asking that! I would not require much in the way of extra food or water but the fire wood would be important!'
answer:
Yes

question:
Context: 'look mate, let me have 3 on food and 2 on firewood, you can have the water and i on firewood' 'why would you not just take 2 packs of each whiile i onlt keep 1?' 'Alright fair enough, let me have 3 on food, 1 on firewood and 1 on water. This trip means alot to me'
Utterance: 'i can do that for you, in on a diet anyways and already have a stock ive been working on since fall'
answer:
No