Question: Sentence A: yeah well you know that i mean i uh you have to agree on this almost i would think i can't imagine not agreeing that everybody should agree on a jury i i i don't know on ours when we we all really agreed on this did you all have any disagreements when you were doing the sentencing

Sentence B: We had a lot of disagreement in my jury.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: The Alternative projects that reductions in exposure to fine PM and ozone due to the Clear Skies Act will result in 3,800 avoided premature deaths in 2010 and nearly 7,200 avoided premature deaths in 2020.
Premature deaths in 2009 were much higher than in 2010.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
This action is required as a result of the Mickey Leland Childhood Hunger Relief Act (Title XIII, Chapter 3, Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, Pub.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Mickey Leland Childhood Hunger Relief Act requires this action.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: He blinked feebly.

Sentence 2: He blinked ferociously
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
It was laminated, and bore the Fat Man's name; Peter Greuze.

Does it follow that "It was flimsy paper with no lamination or writing on it. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "You are going away?", can we conclude that "Are you leaving today?"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell