TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: According to the Rochester team, the findings suggest that our language-learning abilities may have to do with our general cognitive prowess, not with any particular language module. Choices: 1. There's a language module that aids us in our ability to learn a new language. 2. The team at Rochester doesn't have any ideas concerning the basis of learning new languages. 3. A person's general intelligence may be related to the ability to learn a new language according to the team from Rochester.

SOLUTION: 3

PROBLEM: Statement: Following the earl's death, Scottish historian Thomas Carlyle decided to inspire his fellow countrymen through a national gallery devoted to their heroes. Choices: 1. Thomas Carlyle opened a national gallery for the Scottish people. 2. If the earl didn't die, there would be no national gallery from Thomas Carlyle. 3. Thomas Carlyle was an English biologist who studied reptiles.

SOLUTION: 1

PROBLEM: Statement: I'd love some, the president drawled, his eyes widening with desire, but let me finish up here talking about highway appropriations with Sen. Choices: 1. The president would like some. 2. The president was in the middle of a conversation. 3. The president wasn't interested in it.

SOLUTION:
1