In this task, you are given a paper review. Based on the review, your job is to identify language and generate "en" if the review is in English or generate "es" if the review is in Spanish. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

- Strengths: - The paper is clearly written and well-structured. - The system newly applied several techniques including global optimization to end-to-end neural relation extraction, and the direct incorporation of the parser representation is interesting. - The proposed system has achieved the state-of-the-art performance on both ACE05 and CONLL04 data sets. - The authors include several analyses. - Weaknesses: - The approach is incremental and seems like just a combination of existing methods. - The improvements on the performance (1.2 percent points on dev) are relatively small, and no significance test results are provided. - General Discussion: - Major comments: - The model employed a recent parser and glove word embeddings. How did they affect the relation extraction performance? - In prediction, how did the authors deal with illegal predictions? - Minor comments: - Local optimization is not completely "local". It "considers structural correspondences between incremental decisions," so this explanation in the introduction is misleading. - Points in Figures 6 and 7 should be connected with straight lines, not curves. - How are entities represented in "-segment"? - Some citations are incomplete. Kingma et al. (2014) is accepted to ICLR, and Li et al. (2014) misses pages.
en