Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

But it is hard to understand how, if the overall purpose of the Copyright Clause is to encourage creative work, how some retroactive extension could possibly do that. I -- one wonders what was in the principle 13 difficult principle given to Congress and has been exercised so repeatedly out there that would ever kick in?

Hypothesis: The copyright clause is absolutely an alliterative title.
It's impossible to say