In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Let me give you an example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
The answer to this example can be: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Here is why: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

OK. solve this:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Patent Abuse Reduction Act of
2013''.

SEC. 2. PLEADING REQUIREMENTS.

(a) In General.--Chapter 29 of title 35, United States Code, is
amended by inserting after section 281 the following:
''Sec. 281A. Pleading requirements for patent infringement actions
''In a civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to
patents, a party alleging infringement shall include in the initial
complaint, counterclaim, or cross-claim for patent infringement--
''(1) an identification of each patent allegedly infringed;
''(2) an identification of each claim of each patent
identified under paragraph (1) that is allegedly infringed;
''(3) for each claim identified under paragraph (2), an
identification of each accused apparatus, product, feature,
device, method, system, process, function, act, service, or
other instrumentality (referred to in this section as an
'accused instrumentality') alleged to infringe the claim;
''(4) for each accused instrumentality identified under
paragraph (3), an identification with particularity, if known,
of--
''(A) the name or model number of each accused
instrumentality; and
''(B) the name of each accused method, system,
process, function, act, or service, or the name or
model number of each apparatus, product, feature, or
device that, when used, allegedly results in the
practice of the claimed invention;
''(5) for each accused instrumentality identified under
paragraph (3), an explanation of--
''(A) where each element of each asserted claim
identified under paragraph (2) is found within the
accused instrumentality;
''(B) whether each such element is infringed
literally or under the doctrine of equivalents; and
''(C) with detailed specificity, how the terms in
each asserted claim identified under paragraph (2)
correspond to the functionality of the accused
instrumentality;
''(6) for each claim that is alleged to have been infringed
indirectly, a description of--
''(A) the direct infringement;
''(B) any person alleged to be a direct infringer
known to the party alleging infringement; and
''(C) the acts of the alleged indirect infringer
that contribute to or are inducing the direct
infringement;
''(7) a description of the right of the party alleging
infringement to assert each--
''(A) patent identified under paragraph (1); and
''(B) patent claim identified in paragraph (2);
''(8) a description of the principal business of the party
alleging infringement;
''(9) a list of each complaint filed, of which the party
alleging infringement has knowledge, that asserts or asserted
any of the patents identified under paragraph (1);
''(10) for each patent identified under paragraph (1),
whether such patent is subject to any licensing term or pricing
commitments through any agency, organization, standard-setting
body, or other entity or community;
''(11) the identity of any person other than the party
alleging infringement, known to the party alleging
infringement, who--
''(A) owns or co-owns a patent identified under
paragraph (1);
''(B) is the assignee of a patent identified under
paragraph (1); or
''(C) is an exclusive licensee to a patent
identified under paragraph (1);
''(12) the identity of any person other than the party
alleging infringement, known to the party alleging
infringement, who has a legal right to enforce a patent
identified under paragraph (1) through a civil action under any
Act of Congress relating to patents or is licensed under such
patent;
''(13) the identity of any person with a direct financial
interest in the outcome of the action, including a right to
receive proceeds, or any fixed or variable portion thereof; and
''(14) a description of any agreement or other legal basis
for a financial interest described in paragraph (13).''.
(b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for
chapter 29 of title 35, United States Code, is amended by inserting
after the item relating to section 281 the following:

''281A. Pleading requirements for patent infringement actions.''.
(c) Review of Form 18.--Not later than 12 months after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Supreme Court shall review and amend Form 18
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to ensure that Form 18 is
consistent with the requirements under section 281A of title 35, United
States Code, as added by subsection (a).
(d) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section or the
amendments made by this section shall be construed to alter existing
law or rules relating to joinder.

SEC. 3. JOINDER OF INTERESTED PARTIES.

Section 299 of title 35, United States Code, is amended by adding
at the end the following:
''(d) Joinder of Interested Parties.--
''(1) Definition.--In this subsection, the term 'interested
party', with respect to a civil action arising under any Act of
Congress relating to patents--
''(A) means a person described in paragraph (11) or
(13) of section 281A; and
''(B) does not include an attorney or law firm
providing legal representation in the action if the
sole basis for the financial interest of the attorney
or law firm in the outcome of the action arises from an
agreement to provide that legal representation.
''(2) Joinder of interested parties.--In a civil action
arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents, the
court shall grant a motion by a party defending an infringement
claim to join an interested party if the defending party shows
that the interest of the plaintiff in any patent identified in
the complaint, including a claim asserted in the complaint, is
limited primarily to asserting any such patent claim in
litigation.
''(3) Limitation on joinder.--The court may deny a motion
to join an interested party under paragraph (2) if--
''(A) the interested party is not subject to
service of process; or
''(B) joinder under paragraph (2) would deprive the
court of subject matter jurisdiction or make venue
improper.''.

SEC. 4. DISCOVERY LIMITS.

(a) In General.--Chapter 29 of title 35, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following:
''Sec. 300. Discovery in patent infringement suits
''(a) Discovery Limitation Prior to Claim Construction.--
''(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), in
a civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to
patents, if the court determines that a ruling relating to the
construction of terms used in a patent claim asserted in the
complaint is required, discovery shall be limited, until such
ruling, to information necessary for the court to determine the
meaning of the terms used in the patent claim, including any
interpretation of those terms used to support the claim of
infringement.
''(2) Discretion to expand scope of discovery.--
''(A) Timely resolution of actions.--If, under any
provision of Federal law (including the Drug Price
Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law
98-417)), resolution within a specified period of time
of a civil action arising under any Act of Congress
relating to patents will have an automatic impact upon
the rights of a party with respect to the patent, the
court may permit discovery in addition to the discovery
authorized under paragraph (1) before the ruling
described in paragraph (1) as necessary to ensure
timely resolution of the action.
''(B) Resolution of motions.--When necessary to
resolve a motion properly raised by a party before a
ruling relating to the construction of terms (as
described in paragraph (1)), the court may allow
limited discovery in addition to the discovery
authorized under paragraph (1) as necessary to resolve
the motion.
''(b) Sequence and Scope; Cost-Shifting.--
''(1) Definitions.--In this subsection--
''(A) the term 'additional discovery' means
discovery of evidence other than core documentary
evidence; and
''(B) the term 'core documentary evidence', with
respect to a civil action arising under any Act of
Congress relating to patents--
''(i) subject to clause (ii), includes only
documents that--
''(I) relate to the conception,
reduction to practice, and application
for the asserted patent;
''(II) are sufficient to show the
technical operation of the
instrumentality identified in the
complaint as infringing the asserted
patent;
''(III) relate to potentially
invalidating prior art;
''(IV) relate to previous licensing
or conveyances of the asserted patent;
''(V) are sufficient to show
revenue attributable to any claimed
invention;
''(VI) are sufficient to show the
organizational ownership and structure
of each party, including identification
of any person that has a financial
interest in the asserted patent;
''(VII) relate to awareness of the
asserted patent or claim, or the
infringement, before the action was
filed; and
''(VIII) sufficient to show any
marking, lack of marking, or notice of
the asserted patent provided to the
accused infringer; and
''(ii) does not include computer code or
electronic communication, such as e-mail, text
messages, instant messaging, and other forms of
electronic communication, unless the court
finds good cause for including such computer
code or electronic communication as core
documentary evidence of a particular party
under clause (i).
''(2) Discovery sequence and scope.--In a civil action
arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents, the
parties shall discuss and address in the written report filed
under rule 26(f)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure the
views and proposals of the parties on--
''(A) when the discovery of core documentary
evidence should be completed;
''(B) whether the parties will seek additional
discovery under paragraph (3); and
''(C) any issues relating to infringement,
invalidity, or damages that, if resolved before the
additional discovery described in paragraph (3)
commences, will simplify or streamline the case,
including the identification of any key patent claim
terms or phrases to be construed by the court and
whether the early construction of any of those terms or
phrases would be helpful.
''(3) Discovery cost-shifting.--
''(A) In general.--In a civil action arising under
any Act of Congress relating to patents, each party
shall be responsible for the costs of producing core
documentary evidence within the possession, custody, or
control of that party.
''(B) Additional discovery.--
''(i) In general.--A party to a civil
action arising under any Act of Congress
relating to patents may seek additional
discovery if the party bears the costs of the
additional discovery, including reasonable
attorney's fees.
''(ii) Requirements.--A party shall not be
allowed additional discovery unless the party--
''(I) at the time that such party
seeks additional discovery, provides to
the party from whom the additional
discovery is sought payment of the
anticipated costs of the discovery; or
''(II) posts a bond in an amount
sufficient to cover the anticipated
costs of the discovery.
''(C) Rules of construction.--Nothing in
subparagraph (A) or (B) shall be construed to--
''(i) entitle a party to information not
otherwise discoverable under the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure or any other applicable rule
or order;
''(ii) require a party to produce
privileged matter or other discovery otherwise
limited under the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure; or
''(iii) prohibit a court from--
''(I) determining that a request
for discovery is excessive, irrelevant,
or otherwise abusive; or
''(II) setting other limits on
discovery.''.

SEC. 5. COSTS AND EXPENSES.

(a) In General.--Section 285 of title 35, United States Code, is
amended to read as follows:
''Sec. 285. Costs and expenses
''(a) In General.--The court shall award to the prevailing party
reasonable costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, unless--
''(1) the position and conduct of the non-prevailing party
were objectively reasonable and substantially justified; or
''(2) exceptional circumstances make such an award unjust.
''(b) Prohibition on Consideration of Certain Settlements.--In
determining whether an exception under paragraph (1) or (2) of
subsection (a) applies, the court shall not consider as evidence any
license taken in settlement of an asserted claim.
''(c) Recovery.--If the non-prevailing party is unable to pay
reasonable costs and expenses awarded by the court under subsection
(a), the court may make the reasonable costs and expenses recoverable
against any interested party, as defined in section 299(d).''.
(b) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--
(1) Table of sections.--The table of sections for chapter
29 of title 35, United States Code, is amended by striking the
item relating to section 285 and inserting the following:

''285. Costs and expenses.''.
(2) Conforming amendments.--Chapter 29 of title 35, United
States Code, is amended--
(A) in section 271(e)(4), in the flush text
following subparagraph (D), by striking ''attorney
fees'' and inserting ''reasonable costs and expenses,
including attorney's fees,'';
(B) in section 273(f), by striking ''attorney
fees'' and inserting ''reasonable costs and expenses,
including attorney's fees,''; and
(C) in section 296(b), by striking ''attorney
fees'' and inserting ''reasonable costs and expenses
(including attorney's fees)''.
Answer:
Patent Abuse Reduction Act of 2013 - Directs a party alleging infringement in a civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents to include in the court pleadings: an identification of each patent and claim allegedly infringed as well as the accused apparatus, product, feature, device, method, system, process, function, act, service, or other instrumentality (referred to as an "accused instrumentality") alleged to infringe any such claim; an identification of the name or model number of accused instrumentalities that allegedly result in the practice of a claimed invention; for each accused instrumentality, an explanation of where each element of each asserted claim identified is found within the accused instrumentality, whether each such element is infringed literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, and how the terms in each asserted claim correspond to the functionality of the accused instrumentality; for each claim alleged to have been infringed indirectly, a description of: (1) the direct infringement; (2) any person alleged to be a direct infringer known to the party alleging infringement; and (3) the acts of the alleged indirect infringer that contribute to or are inducing the direct infringement; a description of the right of the party alleging infringement to assert each identified patent and claim; the principal business of the party alleging infringement; a list of each complaint filed, of which the party alleging infringement has knowledge, that asserts or asserted any of the identified patents; whether any identified patent is subject to any licensing term or pricing commitments through any agency, organization, or other standard-setting body; the identity of any person other than the party alleging infringement, known to the party alleging infringement, who: (1) owns or co-owns an identified patent or is the assignee of, or an exclusive licensee to, such patent; or (2) has a legal right to enforce an identified patent through a civil action under any Act of Congress relating to patents or is licensed under such patent; and the identity of any person with a direct financial interest in the outcome of the action and a description of any agreement or other legal basis for such financial interest. Sets forth procedures with respect to the joinder of parties and discovery of evidence. Directs each party to be responsible for the costs of producing core documentary evidence within the possession, custody, or control of that party. Defines "core documentary evidence" as documents that: relate to the conception, reduction to practice, and application for the asserted patent; are sufficient to show the technical operation of the instrumentality identified in the complaint as infringing the asserted patent; relate to potentially invalidating prior art; relate to previous licensing or conveyances of the asserted patent; are sufficient to show revenue attributable to any claimed invention; are sufficient to show the organizational ownership and structure of each party, including identification of any person with a financial interest in the asserted patent; relate to awareness of the asserted patent or claim, or the infringement, before the action was filed; and are sufficient to show any marking, lack of marking, or notice of the asserted patent provided to the accused infringer. Excludes from the definition of core documentary evidence any computer code or electronic communication, such as e-mail, text messages, instant messaging, and other forms of electronic communication, unless the court finds good cause. Permits additional discovery under specified conditions if the party seeking such additional discovery bears the costs, including reasonable attorney's fees. Directs courts to award to the prevailing party reasonable costs and expenses, including attorney's fees, unless: (1) the position and conduct of the non-prevailing party were objectively reasonable and substantially justified, or (2) exceptional circumstances make such an award unjust. Allows the court, if the non-prevailing party is unable to pay such costs and expenses, to make the costs and expenses recoverable against interested parties.