input question: Perhaps more to the point, Cassidy has made it clear in earlier writing that he does not like mainstream economists, and he may have been overly eager to accept a story that puts them in a bad light. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Cassidy seemingly admits that he holds bias against mainstream economists."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "um-hum right oh i was thinking about you know like the uh the styrofoam used at uh the fast-food restaurants", can we conclude that "Oh I had the styrofoam that fast-food restaurants use in mind. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: John turned.

Sentence B: John kept going forward, without even looking around.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: The original temple built in 1164 survived only 100 years, and today's reconstruction dates from the 13th century.
The reconstruction happening now dates back 50 years.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
I'm _not_ going to tell.

Here is a hypothesis:
I'm not going to tell you shit.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
exactly exactly right yeah we we have i think we we name drop it a little too much and and don't fully understand what what what it is we're saying i think it's it's focusing in on the issue and walking your talk and and all that kind of rolls in together there but uh

Does it follow that "I think we can name drop."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes