Question:
Based on the premise "She took off with that, but he was sure it wouldn't satisfy the Sather.", can we conclude that "She realised that it wasn't going to work on the Sather, so she changed tack."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: The jury-selection process is another good example of judicial make-work.

Sentence B: The unjust way they jurors are picked makes one wonder if any cases are valid.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Milles tonnerres! cried Poirot, dumfounded.
Poirot ran out of the room in silence.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
The Balanced Budget Act of 1997, enacted August 5, 1997, required the per-beneficiary limitations be established by April 1, 1998.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 was established in April 1998.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: uh you know he enjoys that but uh um i i like i said TV isn't my best subject because but i i do enjoy a good comedy a good movie is a comedy if i can you know sit down and and watch or if they have a good uh

Sentence 2: I can't say I'm very well versed in TV.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"The tobacco industry suffered a potentially catastrophic defection."
Hypothesis: A potentially dangerous defection has been suffered by the tobacco industry.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes