In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: A witch hunt, nothing more nothing less. Did she give any thought to the 3,000 who died in New York and what success has the ICC had to date with the untold $millions which have been spent by this elitist "old boys' club". Pray tell why the Sudanese President is still at large and Mugabe travels freely throughout the world? Ermine robed, latte sipping parasites - that is the ICC.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Enough of this! Grab your plackards, it's time to protest! "What do we want! Hall of fame Bowlen! When do we want it! NOW!" Seriosuly, this is crazy. The man should have been selected this year. I truly believe this is east coast crap once again. Beathard is deserving and in no way am I taking away from him, but had he not been connected to Washington, he would not have been nominated yet.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: And there is probably only one reply to such an terribly insensitive comment coming from a very privileged individual. With a Cat 3 hurricane baring down on Floridians today, unfortunately any rational reply to STO would probably be a bit too un-civil for 'civil comments' That's my best guess...What kind of jokes will you be telling about earthquake victims the next time a 'big one' hits our area. You'll just be laughing yourself silly at your own 'jokes' won't you?

A:
Non-identity-attack
****