In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: First, any Breitbart article should be deemed suspect. Second, the author clearly misunderstood what Francis was saying. He was not saying that there are no Muslim terrorists, he was saying that there is no such thing as "Muslim terrorism", any more than there is "Christian terrorism".

Output: Non-threat

Input: Consider Input: Comment: I think I can grasp your feelings quite well. A woman makes some bad choices, putting her in this horrific gang rape situation, "Well it's her fault. She shouldn't have gotten drunk and left willingly with them. She should've known she'd be gang raped." If you were to look back at what you said and compared it to what you say you "feel", don't you agree that you're being hypocritical? Just saying the obvious. Victim blaming is victim blaming is victim blaming. There are no ifs or buts.

Output: Non-threat

Input: Consider Input: Comment: OH my god. A woman divorced the nation's least funny actor. She should be BURNED ALIVE.
Output: Threat