Problem: Mr. Lessig, on your First Amendment argument I don't see where the retroactivity-prospectivity comes in, because -- I follow your argument under the Copyright Clause, but if you're saying that the time is too long, the public domain should get this stuff sooner rather than later, would you explain to me how your prospectivity-retrospective line fits into your First Amendment claim?

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Lessig has talked to trump"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: It's impossible to say

Problem: Charles Gallet (26 November 1875 - 1 November 1951) was a French lawyer and politician. He started his career as a lawyer in La Roche-sur-Yon. He served as a member of the Chamber of Deputies from 1928 to 1936, where he represented Vendee. He was succeeded by Francois Boux de Casson.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Charles Gallet has a q"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: No

Problem: Two persons were injured in dynamite attacks perpetrated this evening against two bank branches in this northwestern, Colombian city.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The two people were men."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A:
It's impossible to say