Problem: Why wouldn't it? If the equity argument under the Necessary and Proper Clause justifies extension of the copyright for those whose copyright will expire tomorrow if it's not extended, in order to put them on parity with those getting copyrights for new works, why doesn't it apply to the copyright, the holder of the copyright that expired yesterday?

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The person speaking is a legal professional"?

A: It's impossible to say

Problem: In the face of the referendums that have taken place, private citizens' referendums in British Columbia, not only in Smithers, but in Ladner, Vancouver, and Prince George, all of the surveys that have been done, why is he prepared to ignore the expressed wishes of British Columbians and ram this Nisga'a treaty through the House of Commons without giving the people of British Columbia a chance to vote on it in a referendum?

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Upon knowing about the many surveys that came out of britishcolumbians he chose to neglect their hopes. And do what he originally sought out to do with the treaty without their say in it"?

A: Yes

Problem: How to take legal action for player to official violence<br>Call the police. Assault is a crime, and you should call the police as soon as possible. The police will need to investigate and will ask you questions.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "punishment for the crime of assault varies by state"?

A:
It's impossible to say