instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
What a nice birthday treat to once again be (sort of) mentioned by my favorite Portland weekly publication.
answer:
No

question:
Supposedly, HB 2960, which established this program provides that "(n) Provide that the State of Oregon and employers that participate in the plan have no proprietary interest in the contributions to or earnings on amounts contributed to accounts established under the plan."

Of course, that is a Legislative Law; they can change it any time Senator Prozanski or Representative Barnhart or any other Democrat decides that they need more money for one of their programs; they are in the Majority and can just slap the Emergency Clause on new Legislation anytime they feel like it and do whatever they please because the Republicans have no say and the people can't do an Initiative to stop them.
answer:
Yes

question:
See that's the problem. You only see the 1st and 2nd tier spending. From there the vendors you mention it spreads out, to the restaurants, the grocery stores, and on and on until we are ALL affected. If you work for a living this can affect you. If you don't work for a living, or at least don't work for a living anymore, I could see how you would be unconcerned about this -- good for you, glad you can sit there all cushy because you got yours and got out.
answer:
No