Detailed Instructions: You need to read the given passage and construct a question about the information present in the passage. The question should be answerable from the passage. Most importantly, only those questions are allowed whose answers cannot be determined from a single sentence. Do not generate questions that require only a single sentence to answer. Instead, try to combine two sentences and create a question from that combination. Do not create open-ended questions, i.e., the answers to them cannot be found precisely from the information provided in the passage.
Problem:Paragraph- Sent 1: The "visual of a billboard and a narration" is viewed by you as evidence that Moore is trying to somehow tie the two events together, when in reality, it is quite obvious that he does it to separate the introduction of Heston from his speech in Denver.
Sent 2: Moore is a professional filmmaker -- he concentrates on maximum impact of each of the statements he cites, and to accomplish that effect, uses subtle interludes instead of long-winded introductions.
Sent 3: This is a common technique, but because conservative readers are not familiar with the basics of filmmaking, they believe critics who claim that he is "distorting" the interview.
Sent 4: What he does is standard filmmaking practice.
Sent 5: The same goes for the interview which follows.
Sent 6: Moore's critics would expect us to have him quote Heston in his entirety, have him present fully the PR that the NRA has used to justify its rally in Denver for reasons of "balance".
Sent 7: The NRA was fully aware of the scandal it would cause through its rally and decided to push on because they believed to have enough media support to successfully do so.
Sent 8: They were right.
Sent 9: You claim that there was "no way to change location, since you have to give advance notice of that to the members, and there were upwards of 4,000,000 members."Sent 10: 10 days are more than enough to give advance warning of a change in location or date, had the NRA really wanted to.
Sent 11: It is probably correct that their primary reason for not doing so was to save money, not to piss off the victims of Colubmine.
Sent 12: That does not change the fact that they did just that.
Sent 13: Moore presents the most important part of the speech to back up this point and ignores the fluff.
Sent 14: This is what good documentary filmmaking is about.
Sent 15: And here the critics again ignore important evidence: When Heston mentions the mayor of Denver, the crowd boos loudly.
Sent 16: Heston maganimously holds up a hand to read the mayor's letter (only to explain in detail why he chose to ignore the request -- not mentioning at all the reasons you have given!).
Sent 17: This booing by the crowd, not mentioned with a single word in your transcript or your article, shows that the crowd was fully aware of the controversy they would cause by coming to Littleton after children were being killed there -- and they effectively said "Fuck you".
Sent 18: To say that they could not have done otherwise is a bold lie by Moore's critics.
Solution:
The victims and families of which incidents are upset by Heston's speech?