QUESTION: Sara, David, Goldman Sachs Credit, and I have tentatively scheduled a conference call for this Thursday, Jan 3rd, at 1:30 Houston time, 2:30 NY time. We will be discussing our funds we have requested from Goldman Sachs of $944,239.43 for Enron North America and $1,493,287.81 for Enron Credit Inc. Please confirm. Joanne has put on your schedule. Regards,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: goldman sachs Conference call
We are trying to track down the signed documents for this counterparty. Our notes reflect that Samantha Boyd sent them up to Peter for execution on 3/9/01 with instructions to send them back to Samantha Boyd when executed. My understanding is that they were signed in Canada and returned to Samantha, but they have not yet shown up here. If you sent them fedex and can track them via a tracking number can you see if you can find them. They appear to have done some unauthorized trades w/o having the master signed and this has now become a really high priority. Thanks!
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: IMC Canada
At the request of Bob Shults, I am enclosing a clean and redlined copy of the Non-Disclosure Agreement revised to include your comment. If the enclosed meets with your approval, please have the agreement executed and return a copy to me via fax no. (713) 646-3490. I will then have it executed by Enron and return a copy to you via fax.
Answer: Revised PVM NDA
Here is an email: I believe ENA is still agent for Columbia Energy Services and Columbia Energy Marketing on several pipelines. Rich Contos's (the only CES person I know) last day is this Friday. I left Rich a voicemail asking him if CES/CEM should continue to exist as a legal entity on the pipelines. As ENA, I believe I sould at least begin terminating the agency (and liability) relationships. Comments/questions? ?
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: CES and CEM
Q: Karen: See highlited section of story below. PG&E's got it right. Recall that DWR was only buying power that it determined was "priced reasonably." Consequently, the net short wasn't getting picked up. That meant that the ISO would have to go to the real-time market to close the gap. The ISO would then charge the utilities for the power purchased. Recall that Bob Glynn referenced the $300 MM/month that continued to pile up on PG&E's balance sheet as one of the several reasons that PG&E put itself into bankruptcy. Now that PG&E's in bankruptcy, the state is now responsible for the full net short, and can't continue to sluff it off onto PG&E's balance sheet. So it's therefore no surprise that the State's daily bill for power purchases has increased dramatically---just not for any of the bogus reasons cited by
Propose a subject line
A: CA legislature in doubt
Here is an email: Steve: Just thought I'd follow up since our conversation of 9/13 to see if you have had an opportunity to redraft the ISDA Schedule and CSA, and, whether you have reviewed the guaranty which Tana Jones delivered to you shortly thereafter. Please feel free to give me a call at 713-853-5620. I will be on vacation from Oct. 6 - Oct. 13. I look forward to hearing from you. Sara
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
Deutsche Bank AG master agreement