Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you are given the abstract of a research paper. Your task is to generate a summary of this abstract. Your summary should not be very short, but it's better if it's not more than 30 words.

Despite rapid advances in speech recognition, current models remain brittle to superficial perturbations to their inputs. Small amounts of noise can destroy the performance of an otherwise state-of-the-art model. To harden models against background noise, practitioners often perform data augmentation, adding artificially-noised examples to the training set, carrying over the original label. In this paper, we hypothesize that a clean example and its superficially perturbed counterparts shouldn't merely map to the same class--- they should map to the same representation. We propose invariant-representation-learning (IRL): At each training iteration, for each training example, we sample a noisy counterpart. We then apply a penalty term to coerce matched representations at each layer (above some chosen layer). Our key results, demonstrated on the LibriSpeech dataset are the following: (i) IRL significantly reduces character error rates (CER)on both 'clean' (3.3% vs 6.5%) and 'other' (11.0% vs 18.1%) test sets; (ii) on several out-of-domain noise settings (different from those seen during training), IRL's benefits are even more pronounced. Careful ablations confirm that our results are not simply due to shrinking activations at the chosen layers.
In this paper, we hypothesize that superficially perturbed data points shouldn't merely map to the same class---they should map to the same representation.