Q: In 1183, the Taira loss at the Battle of Kurikara was so severe that they found themselves, several months later, under siege in Kyoto, with Yoshinaka approaching the city from the north and Yukiie from the east. Both Minamoto leaders had seen little or no opposition in marching to the capital and now forced the Taira to flee the city. Taira no Munemori, head of the clan since his father Kiyomori's death, led his army, along with the young Emperor Antoku and the Imperial regalia, to the west. The cloistered emperor Go-Shirakawa defected to Yoshinaka. Go-Shirakawa then issued a mandate for Yoshinaka to "join with Yukiie in destroying Munemori and his army".:293-294 In 1183, Yoshinaka once again sought to gain control of the Minamoto clan by planning an attack on Yoritomo, while simultaneously pursuing the Taira westward. The Taira set up a temporary Court at Daaifu in Kyushu, the southernmost of Japan's main islands. They were forced out soon afterwards by local revolts instigated by Go-Shirakawa, and moved their Court to Yashima. The Taira were successful in beating off an attack by Yoshinaka's pursuing forces at the Battle of Mizushima.:295-296 Yoshinaka conspired with Yukiie to seize the capital and the Emperor, possibly even establishing a new Court in the north. However, Yukiie revealed these plans to the Emperor, who communicated them to Yoritomo. Betrayed by Yukiie, Yoshinaka took command of Kyoto and, at the beginning of 1184, set fire to the Hojujidono, taking the Emperor into custody. Minamoto no Yoshitsune arrived soon afterwards with his brother Noriyori and a considerable force, driving Yoshinaka from the city. After fighting his cousins at the bridge over the Uji, Yoshinaka made his final stand at Awazu, in Omi Province. He was defeated by Yoshitsune, and killed while attempting to flee.:296-297
What happened first, the Battle of Kurikara or the seige in Kyoto?
A: Battle of Kurikara

Q: This period was known as the "Golden Age (metaphor)" by the FCZ faithful. At this time, the club was run by the legendary President Edwin Nageli and had players such as Kobi Kuhn, Fritz Kunzli, Ilija Katic, Rene Botteron, and many more. Zurich won seven Swiss Super League in the years 1962-63 Nationalliga A, 1965-66 Nationalliga A, 1967-68 Nationalliga A, 1973-74 Nationalliga A, 1974-75 Nationalliga A, 1975-76 Nationalliga A and 1980-81 Nationalliga A. They also won the Swiss Cup five times in 1966, 1970, 1972, 1973, and in 1976. FCZ also had some success in Europe getting to the semi-finals of the European Cup 1963-64, before losing to Real Madrid C.F. and also reaching the semi-finals in the European Cup 1976-77, where they lost to Liverpool F.C..
How many times did Zurich win the Swiss Cup in the 1970's?
A: 4

Q: The February 2013 offer represented a small premium over the then-current stock price, much lower than the stocks all-time high of $65 USD per share reached during the dotcom bubble in 2000, as well as its July 2005 price of $40 USD which was the high-water mark of the post-dotcom era. The price of $13.65 per share represented a 25% premium to the stock price, but far below the 52-week high of $18.36, and more than 76% off its all-time high. Several major institutional shareholders have voiced opposition, including Southeastern Asset Management and Mason Hawkins. Michael Dell owns the largest single share of the companys stock and was part of negotiations to go private, but only offered $750 million of his own money for a deal that would involve almost $16 billion in new debt. T. Rowe Price, which has the third largest holding, also objected to the low price of the proposal. Southeastern Asset Management, the largest shareholder of Dell stock with about 8.5%, is opposed to the deal at the per share price of $13.50 to $13.75 as they value the company at $23.72 a share. Southeastern also complained that the overseas funds arent offered to sweeten the buyout offer.
How many more dollars was the company's value of the stock over the highest amount offered?
A: 9.97

Q: In May 1959 the first major steps to prepare infiltration routes into South Vietnam were taken; Group 559 was established, a logistical unit charged with establishing routes into the south via Laos and Cambodia, which later became famous as the Ho Chi Minh trail. At about the same time, Group 579 was created as its maritime counterpart to transport supplies into the South by sea. Most of the early infiltrators were members of the 338th Division, former southerners who had been settled at Xuan Mai from 1954 onwards. Regular formations were sent to Southern Vietnam from 1965 onwards; the 325th Divisions 101B Regiment and the 66th Regiment of the 304th Division met US forces on a large scale, a first for the PAVN, at the Battle of Ia Drang Valley in November 1965. The 308th Divisions 88A Regiment, the 312th Divisions 141A, 141B, 165A, 209A, the 316th Divisions 174A, the 325th Divisions 95A, 95B, the 320A Division also faced the US forces which included the 1st Cavalry Division (United States), the 101st Airborne Division, the 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team, the 4th Infantry Division (United States), the 1st Infantry Division (United States), and the 25th Infantry Division (United States). Many of those formations later became main forces of the 3rd Division (Yellow Star Division) in Binh Dinh (1965), the 5th Infantry Division (Vietnam) (1966) of 7th Military Zone (Capital Tactical Area of ARVN), the 7th Division (Vietnam) (created by 141st and 209th Regiments originated in the 312th Division in 1966) and 9th Division (Vietnam) (first Division of National Liberation Front of Vietnam in 1965 in Mekong Delta), the 10th Dakto Division in Dakto - Highland in 1972 south of Vietnam.
Which divisions met US forces at the Battle of Ia Drang Valley?
A:
325th Division