Lynn, attached find the notes I took at our meeting with Alliant this week. I would like to conduct a conference call with you to go over a few of the items which will require Gas Logistics' input. I'll call you at 2:30 today.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Alliant Energy Meeting Notes
Randy, based upon the records review, this is the only issue that may be a= =20 problem. If a tank has been moved to another location, it would trigger=20 requirements which were enacted on the date of the relocation. For instanc= e,=20 if a tank constructed prior to 1973 was moved in 1978, there would be=20 emissions control requirements placed on the tank as required by the 1978= =20 tank regulations. If the tank had remained at its original location, it=20 would be grandfathered with respect to emissions. However, because the tan= k=20 was relocated, it is looked upon as being a tank constructed in 1978 and=20 subject to the 1978 regulations and is no longer grandfathered. I was not given this information during the records review, so I dont know = if=20 any of the tanks apply. If any of the tanks fit into the above scenerio,= =20 EOTT or Koch will be looking at some major $$$$$ to bring any subject tank= =20 into compliance. Generally speaking, the regualtions and costs to comply= =20 increase as a function of date. =20 1. Q. Of the tanks listed on the spreadsheet, have any of the tanks been=20 relocated from its original construction locations? List the tank, date=20 moved and location moved to. A. Benevides Station Tank 6125 and Mirando Station Tank 28591 were relocat= ed=20 to those stations. Three Rivers Tanks 28508 and 28100 were relocated and= =20 re-erected at that station. Duval Station Tank 28052 and Mirando Station= =20 28045 were relocated and re-erected at those stations prior to Koch=01,s= =20 acquisition of those assets.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Koch South Texas pipeline data room questions and answers
Due to computer troubles etc. I did not get the confirms or agreement out last night. I assure you it is going today via Fed Ex First Delivery. Is the previous address still the location you want these docs sent too?
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Honeywell
Tino called this morning with a quick report. They are still negotiating with DOE on a power plant deal, but it looks pretty shaky. The size of the plant has grown to 380 MW, for reasons that are unclear to me. Tino has been ordered to develop an exit strategy in case the power plant deal falls apart. He says Dennis has about $3 mm in the project so far, most of it related to the pipeline right of way. The have a binding 20 year agreement with the tribes for the ROW that calls for a $100,000 minimum monthly payment. I'm not sure the entire route is perfected or not or whether the ROW agreement includes fiber optic rights etc. The question is whether we are even interested enough to justify a closer look, since the rights Dennis has pulled together will probably be available for cents on the dollar. I told Tino I'd give him a call next week to let him know. At minimum, I'd suggest we have one of our ROW guys take a look at whatever they've got and advise us on what its worth. Your thoughts? DF
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Pueblo