Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: The solution Randall was provided by Professor Johnathan Gruber of MIT who wrote most of the ACA for the Obama crowd. And as you recall his recorded comments were that the American public is so stupid they will buy into the programs even though it raises all costs, does not improve health care delivery, and there are not enough doctors to service the basic system. It wasn't enough that Obama illegally stole 600+billion from MEDICARE to help pay for the illegal program, that theft of dedicated funds still has not been corrected by the courts but some issues have. So just where is Mrs. Martell/Murkowski going wrong?

A: Yes
****
Q: Except that it is government " demanding I give them my resources, time .....for free", not corporate America.

A: No
****
Q: First off, it's not a theory: a vote not cast for Hillary is a vote for Trump. Period.
Hillary is a strong supporter of health care: she brought the issue to the fore years ago where it remained.
Women's rights: she's been a champion of equal pay and other issues (Planned Parenthood) for decades.
African-Americans overwhelmingly support her. Do you know why?
Minimum wage: $12. Not as high as Bern, but a large improvement.
Gun control: a decades' long supporter of toughening laws.
Immigration: supporter of Obama.
Education: platform calls for free community college; debt-free public university attendance through $2500/year credit.
So, I don't know what you mean about her progressive ideas and credentials. Not as far as Bern, right, but a MASSIVE, MASSIVE difference from Trump.
Please, read this and learn a bit about her: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/hillary-clinton-believe-candidate-stands-10-issues/

A:
No
****