Subject: "Non-ISDA Master CP's".

Body: Attached is a list of high volume "old" ECT Masters which was obtained from the confirmation desk. Many of them appeared on our working list from last year. Tanya: We have enough legal help to pursue the names on the list. Would you like to prioritize or amend?

Subject: "Sherry Dawson Review & Performance Agreement".

Body: Frank, Attached is the end of year review and performance agreement for Sherry Dawson. Also attached are the reviews for the rest of group I lead. I'm not sure if you need the reviews for the rest of the group, but I attached them anyway. Thanks,

Subject: "Reference Entity review".

Body: I received the proposed list of reference entities today. Here is a draft of a memo that I cobbled together to use in trying to get input from others within Enron for the restriced list. Would you let me know what you think? I will be meeting with Mark H. tomorrow to talk with him about it. It isn't clear to me who should receive this and from whom it should come. Since the communications people may have relationships with some of these folks, is Kristina the right person? I know that EES has some kind of joint venture with AOL - should Vicki sign off? If it is going to such persons, should the memo come from Mark? Cliff Baxter? John Sheriff? Jim Derrick?

Subject: "Sun Devil Meeting".

Body:
Kim, Kevin would like to have a 1 hour meeting either Tuesday or Wednesday and have all the Sun Devil Commercial people attend. I'm not sure who all that involves, but would you either forward this to them with a request for availability or tell me who to poll. Thanks for your assistance with this.