Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: First, you have to convince the US Congress to pass a law permitting a State to go bankrupt---like they refused to do earlier this year when Puerto Rico proved that their Democratically-controlled government was too incompetent to manage their own budget over numerous years.

You have to convince the Oregon Supreme Court that OUR Constitution is wrong when it says that you can't impair Contracts. (If you can't do that, the Federal Courts will let their decision stand. "States rights", I think they call it. It will never get to SCOTUS.)

You have to also convince our Oregon Supreme Court that the US CONSTITUTION is wrong when it says you can't impair Contracts.

THEN you have to convince SCOTUS....and there are several of the 'liberal' Justices who may be 'liberal' on abortion or affirmative action and such who are downright super-conservative on other types of issues....like whether the Contract clause should be followed.
Non-sexual-explicit