In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: ESPN with the imploding business plan. A network allegedly dedicated to reporting on the usually benign topic: sports. Yet, the network's double-standards and hypocrisy were laid bare. She should've been Terminated-for-Cause. The fact ESPN gave her the wink, wink is why ESPN is hemorrhaging tens of millions of dollars in annual losses.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: We don't need free trade deals with "developing" nations. Until China starts playing by the same rules as the rest of the Developed world we don't need to be signing trade deals with them.

I trust the Russians more than I trust the Chinese.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: Odds are your completed house is uglier and more dangerous than that house. And for the fine, it's not supposed to be punitive, so using a percentage makes no sense. I at least agree that government properties shouldn't be exempt, but that just passes a fee onto the budget that we'll have to pay.

A:
Non-obscene
****