You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Solution: Disagree
Why? This comment expresses strong disagreement with right-wing politics, is disrespectful (accusing right-wingers "lack of basic human decency"), and comes with personal attack (to the user pBurns9). Thus, this comment is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement from others.

New input: Comment: that blatant liar is John Horgan. He has promised to spend so much money on unbelievably economy-destroying ideas like $10 childcare, massive expansion of the social service and teachers, buying renter voters with $400 handouts, eliminating new bridge tolls, cancelling clean hydro project site C. He is either lying because he won't deliver those items, or he is lying about the amount of massive tax increases and deficits he will have to impose on the hard working taxpayers. He is also lying saying he will end the kinder morgan expansion - he cannot legally do anything about it. A vote for NDP will mean we will see our debt-to-GDP and unemployment skyrocket like it did in every province where the NDP has had power!
Solution:
Disagree