Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: The Clintons are not a "crime family", and your assertion that "The vast majority of America (sic)" has "rendered a guilty verdict" is incorrect.

In fact, as the editor points out, "the mess" is the trumped-up charges against HRC bought by gullible suckers looking for a scapegoat. The editor calls for setting aside these differences, along with the irrationality and anger that accompany them.

That would entail that people like you, with your cut-and-paste defamation of every single registered member of the Democratic Party (63 million patriotic voters) are "village idiots", "Sanctimonious hypocrites" or, impossibly, "Clinton Crime Family" members. Now, how many times have you posted that exact nonsense? a dozen times? more? You must be very proud of your formulation, despite the idiocy it embodies.

If Trump is elected, I'll be surprised and unhappy, but I'll live with it. That is, unless it results in thermonuclear war.

This editorial was directed toward you, go-ducks.
Non-obscene