Q: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
Comment: Wow...armchair quarterbacks, dribbling nonsense and labeling it "wisdom." Meeks and his disciples need to stop talking (you're an embarrassment to Ducks football).

1. Beating ANY PAC-12 team 13 times in a row is practically impossible. The Ducks are 12-1 against Washington in the last 13 years. Stop for a moment and consider that. The so-called "streak" is meaningless.

2. The program is not spiraling. Give the coach time to turn it around. No Oregon coach has ever won a championship; Helfrich doesn't need to be fired for not taking us there this year.

3. Washington and WSU are both fantastic teams this year. We deserved to get clobbered by them. Prior to the streak, UW has always owned us. They've long been an elite program, the Ducks are still newcomers.

4. We need to get rid of the stupid, cutesy uniforms! I hate thinking "Oregon football where every week is Halloween." Look the part; play the part.

Let the coach handle football. Meeks: Go back to your desk
A:
Non-identity-attack