Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example is below.
Q: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
A: Yes
Rationale: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: "This bill doesn't go far enough."

I couldn't agree more. The proposed bill ought to emphasize safe driving---prevention, not just the penalty the killer will face after the fact. For added perspective, motorists crashed 5,419,000 times in 2010 alone, killing 32,999, injuring 2,239,000 and causing hundreds of billions of dollars in property damage. Avoidable and pointless traffic violations are a factor in most of them. This happens because it's allowed to happen. It won't stop until the penalty for aggressive driving is made consummate with the death and destruction it causes. Raise the penalty for speeding, running red lights and tailgating to $10,000 and a year in jail; watch how fast the body count takes a dive.
A:
No