Premise:
"There was an enormous oven."
Hypothesis: The kitchen contained only a stove.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: However, because the discounts for bulk mail are cost based, any lost revenues should be offset by corresponding reduced costs. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The discounts for bulk mail are cost based and top out at 5c per 100,000."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Reluctantly, I got ready to run.", can we conclude that "I prepared to run from the zombies, even though I didn't want to."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: In , Chatterbox writes, the hallmarks of Lapham's style are a magnificent contempt for mankind's folly and an apparent conviction that the United States is reenacting the last days of Rome.

Sentence B: Lapham's work primarily is used to point out the differences between the United States and the last days of Rome.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: What the next form will be depends on the sum of a person's actions in his previous life, his karma.
The next form does not depend on the actions taken in this life.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
The RLC ad says Forbes hurt the Republican Party in 1996 and will help the Democrats in 2000 by criticizing his GOP rivals.

Here is a hypothesis:
The ad says that Forbes did the Republican party a disservice in 1996.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes