You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.

exhaustion of administrative remedies, petition for writ of mandamus may be filed in Leon County, Florida); Stovall v. Cooper, 860 So.2d 5, 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)(petition for writ of mandamus as to gain time lies against the Department of Corrections in the county wherein which the DOC keeps its headquarters, i.e., Leon County). The record reflects that Borroto was sentenced to nine months in the Dade County jail in case number 01-25640 on July 22, 2002, and to nine months in the Dade County jail in case number 01-26153 on August 9, 2002. In each instance, the trial court ordered and the defendant received all credit for time served. The State concedes that Borroto has satisfied the sentence requirements in both cases, as he was entitled to 332 days for time served in case A 1995)(<HOLDING>). We note that based upon the attachments to
Holding statements: (A) holding that after exhausting administrative remedies if the defendant believes the department of corrections ruling is incorrect he may file a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court for the second judicial circuit leon county florida (B) holding that a plaintiff may not avoid exhausting the administrative remedies by requesting money damages (C) holding that a procedural default in exhausting administrative remedies bars relief in federal court (D) holding a claim not previously raised or ruled on by the circuit court was waived in an appeal from the denial of a writ of mandamus (E) holding that defendant seeking credit for time served must exhaust administrative remedies within the department of corrections prior to seeking judicial relief
Output:
holding that a plaintiff may not avoid exhausting the administrative remedies by requesting money damages