QUESTION: Premise: "A woman wearing a fluorecent safety jacket stands near equipment."
Hypothesis: "A woman got hit by a car."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: A woman hit by a car could not be the same woman who stands in a fluorescent safety jacket.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A young woman wearing a red shirt stands in a soccer goal and kicks a ball."
Hypothesis: "A young woman is playing basketball."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
In a soccer game the target is to make a goal by kicking the ball and in a basketball the target is to make a goal by dropping the ball into the basket with the ball keeping in hands.
The answer is no.

Q: Can we conclude from "A man in black shirt is binding wheat." that "A man binding wheat."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A man binding wheat is equivalent to a man binding wheat.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: If "A soccer player wearing white jogs past other soccer players who are on the ground." does that mean that "While a fan in the background celebrates the ball going into the net."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A fan celebrates a goal while one soccer player in white jogs past some other players on the ground.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] If "A boat named ""eloin"" floats on the water." does that mean that "A boat named ""eloin"" floats on the water."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A boat floats on the water - The sentences are the same.
The answer is yes.

Q: Can we conclude from "Two people riding bikes smile at each other." that "Two smiling people are riding bicycles."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A:
To smile at each other is smiling. Riding bicycles is a rephrasing of riding bikes.
The answer is yes.