You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.

retailers for them to resell, but to specifically encourage its customers in Tennessee to access its website to -find and purchase Defendant's products in Tennessee. The Court therefore finds Defendant purposefully availed itself of this forum. B. Arises Out Of Or Relates To "In the ordinary patent infringement suit, the claim asserted by the paten-tee plaintiff is that some act of making, using, offering to sell, selling, or importing products or services by the defendant constitutes an infringement of the presumptively valid patent named in suit." Avocent Huntsville Corp. v. Aten Int'l Co., 552 F.3d 1324, 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (citing 35 U.S.C. 271(a)). Consequently, for specific jurisdiction purposes, a claim typically arises out of or relates to the infringing activity. See id. (<HOLDING>) In the instant action, Plaintiffs, claim is
Holding statements: (A) holding that an assignment or sale of rights in the invention and potential patent rights is not a sale of the invention within the meaning of section 102b (B) holding in an ordinary patent infringement suit the claim both arises out of and relates to the defendants alleged manufacturing using or selling of the claimed invention (C) holding that the computer readable code claimed in claim 6 the product claim was a part or component of that invention (D) holding a nonparty to a patent infringement suit who funded an unsuccessful challenge to a patent could not file a subsequent lawsuit again challenging the patent (E) holding that knowledge of the patent is required for willful infringement
Output:
holding that an assignment or sale of rights in the invention and potential patent rights is not a sale of the invention within the meaning of section 102b