Premise:
"This city of a thousand fountains, huge plane trees, and a sprawling fortress was probably founded by Hannibal in 219 b.c."
Hypothesis: The city was likely founded by Hannibal in 219 B.C.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: A more controversial measure of personal saving would include changes in the value of existing assets. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Personal saving does not include changes in the value of something."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "Lest anyone confuse these demands with negotiation, Albright insisted, We're not trying to please President Milosevic.", can we conclude that "They wanted to please President Milosevic."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: , thoroughness, appropriate use of investigative techniques, impartiality, objectivity, protection of individual rights, and timeliness) is exercised.

Sentence B: Nobody uses thoroughness, impartiality, objectivity, and protection of a single persons anymore.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Two other notable buildings in Hawkshead are the Quaker Meeting House, dating from 1688, and the Minstrel's Gallery Cafe on Flag Street, a 15th-century building that now provides refreshment for today's visitors.
Nothing from Hawkshead could be considered remarkable.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
You think I mind saying it, but I don't in the least!

Here is a hypothesis:
I actually do mind saying it at all.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no