Teacher:In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:
(1) Contrary to the Weinberger Doctrine, which states that
the United States should use military force only if it is in
the vital national interest of the United States and only with
clearly defined political and military goals, the United States
went to war against Iraq in March 2003 without clearly defined
political and military goals.
(2) Contrary to the Powell Doctrine, which states that if
the United States is to use military force it should be
''overwhelming'' military force, the United States went to war
against Iraq without the troop levels or strategy needed to
secure a post-invasion Iraq.
(3) Ignoring the advice of United States military leaders
and experts, the President sent United States troops into war
against Iraq without sufficient levels needed for post-conflict
success and without sufficient armor and related equipment, and
has used the United States military in such a way that today it
is straining under the weight of the war.
(4) The justifications cited by the President for using
military force against Iraq--that Iraq possessed weapons of
mass destruction and Iraq had links to al Qaeda--have not, to
date, been proven correct.
(5) On May 1, 2003, the President announced the end of
major combat operations in Iraq, thus starting an entirely new
phase--the occupation of Iraq.
(6) The justifications cited by the President for using
military force against Iraq have shifted dramatically since
Congress passed the Authorization for Use of Military Force
Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107-243), from
combating the threat that Saddam Hussein allegedly posed to the
United States, to establishing an Iraqi democracy, and to a
larger vision of Middle Eastern democracy.
(7) Public Law 107-243 authorized the President to use
force to ''defend the national security of the United States
against the continuing threat posed by Iraq''.
(8) Currently, United States troops are not facing a
military force or direct threat to the United States in Iraq,
rather they are facing both a Sunni insurgency against the
United States occupation of Iraq and a violent, long-standing
struggle between Sunni and Shia Islam on the streets of
Baghdad--neither of which pose a ''continuing threat'' to the
United States.
(9) Public Law 107-243 clearly reflected the President's
policies of preemption and unilateralism that have left the
United States with an open-ended and ill-defined occupation of
a country in the middle of a civil war.
(10) The President's policies of preemption and
unilateralism that led the United States into Iraq now leave
the United States with no clear exit strategy from Iraq.
(11) The escalation of the use of military force in Iraq
continues the retreat from long-held United States policies of
diplomacy, deterrence, and containment.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PUBLIC LAW 107-243.

The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution
of 2002 (Public Law 107-243) is hereby repealed.

SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) Congress should vote on a new authorization for use of
force resolution that--
(A) reflects the current situation in Iraq;
(B) abandons the Bush Doctrine of preemption and
unilateralism; and
(C) realigns United States policy with its long-
held engagement priorities of diplomacy, deterrence,
and containment;
(2) the United States should establish a quick-reaction
United States military force with an over-the-horizon presence
in the region to respond as needed to imminent security threats
in the Middle East;
(3) the United States should enhance and intensify
diplomatic relations that will provide the proper external
environment and support for the difficult internal steps that
the Government of Iraq should take to promote national
reconciliation;
(4) the United States should increase efforts to engage all
neighboring countries and the League of Arab States in
promoting stability in Iraq;
(5) the United States should maintain its commitment to
continue to provide humanitarian and reconstruction assistance
in Iraq;
(6) the United States should redirect diplomatic, economic,
and military support to Afghanistan, where the Taliban
continues to destabilize the region; and
(7) the United States should aggressively pursue Osama Bin
Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri, al Qaeda and other terrorist
organizations that continue to pose an imminent threat to the
United States.
Student:
Repeals P.L. 107-243 (Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002).

Expresses the sense of Congress that: (1) Congress should vote on a new authorization for use of force resolution that reflects the current Iraq situation, abandons the Bush Doctrine of preemption and unilateralism, and realigns U.S. policy with its long-held priorities of diplomacy, deterrence, and containment; (2) the United States should establish a quick-reaction U.S. military force with an over-the-horizon presence in the region; (3) the United States should intensify diplomatic relations to support the difficult internal steps that the government of Iraq should take to promote national reconciliation; (4) the United States should increase efforts to engage all neighboring countries and the League of Arab States in promoting Iraq's stability; (5) the United States should continue to provide humanitarian and reconstruction assistance in Iraq; (6) the United States should redirect diplomatic, economic, and military support to Afghanistan; and (7) the United States should aggressively pursue Osama Bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri, al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations that continue to pose an imminent threat to the United States.