Question: Sentence A: The California primaries and ballot initiatives demonstrate that 1) California voters are content with the status quo (career politicians won big) and 2) it doesn't take money to win elections anymore (millionaire political neophytes lost big).

Sentence B: The primaries and ballot initiatives in California show important information about California voters.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Somehow Drew got an arm under Anse's shoulders and tried to hoist him up.
Drew tried to lift Anse up.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
it was that bad huh

Here is a hypothesis:
It could have been worse right?

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Thorn turned and looked at the mercenary.

Sentence 2: Thorn glared at the mercenary in front of him.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
In contrast, the rule as proposed would have required sources to document for each process all major hazards, the consequences of each of these hazards, the risk reduction steps taken to address each hazard, and the consequences of each risk reduction step.

Does it follow that "The proposed rule requires sources to document each process."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "I then washed three of the sets 14 times each, in hot water, with each of the fine household products I mentioned above.", can we conclude that "I washed three of the sets fourteen times each, in hot water, with each of the products I mentioned."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes