input question: But I think I'd better get back and rout out Tuppence." If this premise is true, does that tell us:""I'd better rout out Tuppence, so I'll get back."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "the World Wide Area Football League WWAFL or whatever they call it WWAFL", can we conclude that "WWAFL stands for the World Wide Area Football League or something like that."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: And it means Alabama won't have a half-million dollars cut from its budget as had been expected.

Sentence B: Alabama didn't have its budget cut because the initial justification for doing so didn't stand up to scrutiny.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: yeah yeah course he he came after a legend too Tom Landry so he had some uh tough row to hoe there
beginning his career after the legend Tom Landry means that he will always be compared to the former
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
A precondition to risk assessment is the establishment of clear, consistent agency objectives.

Here is a hypothesis:
Consistent agency objectives aren't important in risk assessment.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
Four knights of a golden kingdom defending the villages from the sand king and his army.

Does it follow that "Four knights fought to keep the villages safe."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes