Premise:
"Israel i saw that on Twenty uh 20/20 or something last week you know the about the migration and it's just and and jeez i don't know what their doing with all the people"
Hypothesis: There must be so many people coming into Israel.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: As you peer into the dripping gloom, you can marvel at the fact that it still stands, 1,500 years after it was built. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"It stood for only 600 years before being demolished by a Mongol invasion force. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "oh sure and and there's going to be a lot of you know cover your ass and you know well you can cut his program but not mine and", can we conclude that "People will want to cut the programs that don't affect their voters because they want to be reelected."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: 1.9 GAGAS may be used in conjunction with professional standards issued by other authoritative bodies.

Sentence B: GAGAS should never be used alongside professional standards issued by other authoritative bodies.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: This 1770s mansion was formerly the residence of viscount Powerscourt and still possesses some magnificent plasterwork, particularly in the rear exit hall.
Viscount Powerscourt did not live in this mansion.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Or the program could be restricted in various ways in order to blunt possible objections.

Here is a hypothesis:
The program will not ever have any objections made about it.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no