Problem: Here is a premise:
The risks to the environment and to workers seem theoretical.

Here is a hypothesis:
The risks to both environment and worker seem theoretical.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Were we seeing it tonight?

Sentence 2: Were we going to watch it?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
The reason for delineating these various types is to emphasize that if the advocacy of offering the discounts is to be analyzed, all of the dimensions need to be considered.

Does it follow that "Delineating those types is to deemphasize that all dimensions should be considered."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If The GOP's Why the Republicans will save Clinton by destroying themselves., can we say that "Why the Republicans will utterly destroy Clinton."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"President Clinton officially released his 1998 budget . He says it will boost investment in education, cut taxes, and eradicate deficit spending for more than 20 years."
Hypothesis: President Clinton stated that his budget will raise taxes.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: and you know it's it was uh basically all based on oil because nobody actually like for example if uh let's say if uh you know Brazil took over you know Surinam i don't think anybody would care

Sentence 2: Brazil would never try to take over Surinam because everyone would care.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no