Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: We cant trust people who change ethical positions to stay in power. #whichjulesbailey #whichtedwheeler We would have wasted $10 Billion as estimated by Joe Cortright who is quoted as an expert on this. ODOT also used the endless lies used by Bailey. All the lies and roll vall listed here.. http://tinyurl.com/csatalking
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Not really late. I am talking across the board reduction in the operating budget. Based on allocation, some agencies will take more, some less. Some departments will be eliminated. It is going to happen, might as well get out in front of it and get it done. I am sure some, although very limited, agencies have taken substantial cuts, but more have to be made. I lived in the mid-80's crash and know what it was like. I can tell you history is about to repeat itself. Brings to mind the old bumper sticker... Lord gives us another Prudhoe Bay and I promise not to pass it away. Not gonna happen this time around.
Example Output: No

Example Input: If I recall the details correctly, Reynolds was an applicant for the job Gissiner got, then she stayed on in her former position, subsequently being fired by Gissiner.
Now, is it any surprise that the person who got the job would find some reason to fire his main potential rival? No, not at all, nor is it a surprise that she'd sue.
The sensible procedure for the City would have been to recognize the all too common political and personal dynamics in Reynolds's firing, and compensate her, without throwing away even more money in fighting what was almost a slam dunk on Reynolds part.
Example Output:
No