You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Why? This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

New input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Fiscal Accountability and
Transparency in Infrastructure Spending Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:
(1) Agency.--The term ''agency'' has the meaning given the
term ''Executive agency'' in section 105 of title 5, United
States Code.
(2) Alternate infrastructure type bidding.--The term
''alternate infrastructure type bidding'' means a process under
which a Federal, State or local agency determines, from
engineering and economic analysis, that 2 or more initial
project designs utilizing different construction materials and
methods and their forecasted performance and life-cycle costs
are comparable or similar enough to warrant solicitation of
bids on more than 1 design for a project.
(3) Life-cycle cost analysis.--The term ''life-cycle cost
analysis'' means a process for evaluating the total economic
worth of an infrastructure project by analyzing initial costs
and discounted future costs, such as structural maintenance,
user costs, reconstruction, rehabilitation, restoring, and
resurfacing costs, over at least a 50-year period.
(4) Major infrastructure projects.--The term ''major
infrastructure projects'' means highway, transit, rail
(including high-speed passenger rail), airport, seaport, public
housing, energy, water, bridge, and military construction
projects, including those authorized under titles 23, 40, and
49, United States Code, for which the total Federal cost
estimated by the Federal or State government, including the
cost of materials, is not less than $5,000,000.
(5) Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide.--The term
''Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide'' means the
pavement design guide and software, developed under National
Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 1-37A, providing a
uniform basis for the design of flexible, rigid, and composite
pavements, using mechanistic-empirical approaches.

SEC. 3. LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS.

(a) Requirement To Obtain Life-Cycle Cost Analysis.--Not later than
1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, each agency shall
obtain a life-cycle cost analysis based on the standards developed by
the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to subsection (c) for each
major infrastructure project prior to obligating funds.
(b) Sources of Life-Cycle Cost Analysis.--The life-cycle cost
analysis required under subsection (a) may be obtained from State or
local governments, or private sector entities.
(c) Guidance.--
(1) Development.--Not later than 6 months after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget, in consultation with the American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,
shall issue a circular that provides guidance to agencies on
implementing the requirements under subsection (a).
(2) Requirements.--In developing the circular required
under paragraph (1), the Director shall--
(A) provide the public with notice and opportunity
to comment before issuing the circular;
(B) consider the principles contained in section 2
of Executive Order 12893, ''Principles for Federal
Infrastructure Investments'' (January 31, 1994; 59 Fed.
Reg. 4233); and
(C) require that any analysis obtained pursuant to
subsection (a)--
(i) be conducted over at least a 50-year
valuation period; and
(ii) use actual material life and
maintenance cost data.
(d) Transparency.--Any life-cycle analysis obtained by an agency
pursuant to subsection (a) shall be posted on the agency's Web site not
later than 72 hours after it is received.

SEC. 4. FLEXIBILITY TO USE ALTERNATE INFRASTRUCTURE TYPE BIDDING
PROCEDURES.

(a) Application to National Highway System.--A State transportation
department or local transportation agency may, in its sole discretion,
award contracts for projects on the National Highway System pursuant to
alternate infrastructure type bidding procedures.
(b) Application to Other Major Infrastructure Programs.--
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, Federal, State and local
governments may award contracts for major infrastructure projects
pursuant to alternate infrastructure type bidding procedures.

SEC. 5. MECHANISTIC-EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN GUIDE.

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of Transportation shall require States to utilize the
Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide for the initial design
phase of all projects authorized under title 23, United States Code.
Solution:
Fiscal Accountability and Transparency in Infrastructure Spending Act of 2011 - Requires each executive agency to obtain a life-cycle cost analysis for each major infrastructure project prior to obligating funds. Defines "life-cycle cost analysis" as a process for evaluating the total economic worth of an infrastructure project by analyzing specified costs over a minimum 50-year period.

Authorizes the use of alternate infrastructure type bidding procedures for awarding contracts for projects on the National Highway System and for major infrastructure projects.

Requires the Secretary of Transportation to require states to utilize the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (developed under the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project I-37A)for the initial design phase of all authorized highway projects.