In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

filmmakers will use all manner of tricks to flesh out and brighten up a dull , dreary , and overused idea .
doug liman ( swingers ) , director of the ultra - hip and severely dark comedy go , is an example of just such a filmmaker .
in his latest , he gives the viewers a raucous , neon - lit backdrop as cinematographer and points the audience down a drug - infested path of misadventure as director .
but he fails to come up with any parallel structure in his multi - tiered movie and he fails to connect with the audience on any level , bringing the worth of his efforts to nil and the value of go to about the same .
his movie is produced anthology - style -- telling the same story from multiple ( three ) points of view , much as an author might write a serial novel .
consistent with this ethic , liman and screenwriter john
august provide a bit of an overlap at the beginning of each narrative and insert brief connections to other narratives .
the thread that laces the three stories together is a drug deal and the events thereafter .
in story a we have checkout clerk ronna ( sarah polley ) looking to score some rent money and turning to drug trafficking to do it ; in story b we have
regular drug dealer simon ( desmond askew ) gone to las vegas giving ronna her opportunity ; and in story c we have gay soap actors zack ( jay mohr ) and adam ( scott wolf ) working undercover for the police to bust said drug deal .
neither of the three stories have much substance , and the movie has the feel of a campfire story ( albeit a rather strange one ) that could be told in five to ten minutes .
( in fact , the movie was originally a short film entitled x expanded to feature length . )
the early april release date is too mistimed to capitalize on the movie 's christmas setting , and the los angeles / las vegas nightlife is something too far from the mainstream for most theater - goers to attach themselves to .
the characters are shallow to the point of prerequisite , and performances from little - known players like polley , askew , and taye diggs do n't help or hurt the roles .
in fact , even bigger names like mohr , wolf , and katie holmes do n't have enough time to make substantial success .
although that 's almost expected for lack of continuous screen time , the success in the picture should come from a thread that binds the stories .
go does n't have this , and it suffers because of it . as far as teen movies are concerned , go
represents the absolute bottom , for its constant stream of indecipherable light and sound mean nothing without some sort of common theme .
( the following do not count as common themes : drug deals , people attempting to have romantic interludes with drug dealers , people resorting to drug deals for alterior motives , or people not involved in drug deals stumbling into them . ) at times , the humor in go is sickly funny , and on a low night , almost watchable ; but for the majority of its running time and for most viewers , this movie will best be left to teens at blockbuster on a saturday night .
N