input question: News lays out Starr's probable The independent counsel will indict Lewinsky and name Clinton as an unindicted co-conspirator, likely forcing the prez to testify. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The president will be punished for his actions."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "My concern here isn't so much for Leuchter or even the Holocaust revisionists, who'll just think he was sandbagged.", can we conclude that "I have other important concerns besides Leuchter."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: to protect agricultural laborers, both foreign and domestic.

Sentence B: There exists both foreign and domestic agricultural laborers.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: To contribute to that national target, the senior executive in the Nashville regional office had a performance expectation for his office to meet a target accuracy rate of 59.
The accuracy rate the senior executive decided on was 59.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
I dare say it's some natural law that we haven't found out.

Here is a hypothesis:
It's nothing unusual, I dare say.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
Still, its hidden coves, remarkable natural harbors, and more than 1,000 Megalithic monuments inscrutable remnants of the island's prehistoric origins are dazzling.

Does it follow that "The island has twelve natural harbors and twenty hidden coves."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell