Instructions: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
Input: Statement: What's wrong with informing certain segments of the electorate that your opponent is using the feel-good rhetoric of solutions to pull a fast one at their expense? Choices: 1. One should never discuss one's opponent with the electorate. 2. There's nothing wrong with telling the voters about the opposing candidate's underhanded tactics. 3. The opponent is proposing highly illegal solutions in order to woo voters.
Output:
2