Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: You are correct, but you have to also understand that this just makes the protesters look like foolish, intolerant, children. This kind of behavior is becoming more and more common and I think Trump is a direct result of this kind of new liberalism.

These people did EXACTLY what the Trumpkins wanted.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Then tax demolition and gentrification at a rate that will suppress the increase in the growth rate.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Ambler- maybe. I could see a route from tanana being beneficial because of the amount of people coming/going. But...who's going to drive that? (After fueling stations deem it fiesable). That's a seriously long drive, and airfare beats those costs 10 fold.

Knik arm. No. Not only would it save a small amount of time. It is chalk full of unconsolidated soils that would be subject to extreme damages from settling and an inevitable DISASTER when an earthquake strikes. The glenn is not that bad. They just need to make that sucker 3 lanes deep the entire way.

In the end, it is Fairbanks that will boom due to the incoming F-35 squadrons. Probably another 5k troops to benefit to the economy there.

We can see benefits in almost anything, sh*t=fertilizer. If you have a million dollars and you buy a million dollar house, it may be cool for awhile.

Up until the property taxes come due. I'm a firm believer that building on crap will become crap itself. Fixing what we have is #1 priority.
Example Output:
Yes