You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no".
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Was Michelangelo straight though? I mean, being a pizza-maniac ninja would indicate so, but... You never know.
Solution: yes
Why? This text has indentity directed abuse because it is trying to judge sexual orientation of Michelangelo. Hence, the answer is "yes"

New input: > Neither of these seem to be anything of what people are saying. First of all, one, "piracy helps me try games before I buy" is one, if not the biggest argument for piracy. Second, the first being true, "I'll pirate the game to spite the developers" is the *second* most common argument for piracy. > Non-Americans seem to forget other countries often have a difficult time purchasing games. What the f-- Oh, yeah, totally. I mean, Nintendo literally didn't produce systems in Brazil for half of the Wii U / 3DS lifespan and only just got back in its industry, and obviously the inconvenience of downloading a 80MB app is on the exact same level of legal fuckery as "we do not officially sell our products in your country". Conversely, I've seen almost no one argue against people who *literally cannot buy a game legally* pirating, much like how no one gives a shit if you download the original *Super Mario Bros. 3*. But games like *The Outer Worlds* and possibly *Borderlands 3* *aren't even out yet.* Do you *actually* fucking think *any* of the people in the linked thread aren't red-blooded, glued-to-their-seats Americans, let alone Westerners?
Solution:
no