In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Merely removing him from the cabinet is not enough, Gordhan should be imprisoned for his crimes

Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: A well articulated opinion. Sadly, Ms Wente grossly underestimates the power of the vast hordes of broader public sector employees and their Unions to mobilize the vote for whoever is promising the status quo for them. So long as they are kept in the lap of luxury, with all the attendant 5-star perks that others can only dream of, no party preaching fiscal restraint can ever win. Exactly what Justin did, promising to spend more.
For all of Trumps darker sides, his pro economy pro business model is slowly starting to appeal to voters of all stripes, except perhaps the extreme socialists. It would be nice of other mature economies can emulate Trumponomics minus the unpleasant elements like anti trade, anti [legal] immigrant policies.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: The insurance industry person says, "Instead of hitting themselves in the head and saying 'How stupid I am for not buying insurance to cover my condo,' they will sue," Savio says. "People do not buy enough insurance because they think something like this will never happen to them. When it does, they don't want to take responsibility." WHAT?! This is another example of blaming victims for a fire they did not cause exacerbated by the lack of fire safety responsibility by the Association and lack of prevention rules responsibility by the City. Looking forward to successful suits waged by owners as well as renters who were affected and who are still prohibited from retrieving their belongings.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit