Premise:
"i i just don't uh see how"
Hypothesis: I can totally see how.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: Adrin didn't move. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Adrin was motionless."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "An intervention template with options incorporating the alcohol problem intervention into the various settings should be developed and evaluated.", can we conclude that "No templates should be developed and evaluated for intervention. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: An example of an investment with a split purpose is a grant issued to a state to construct segments of the National Highway System and to conduct highway research.

Sentence B: A grant issued to a state to make segments of a highway system and to conduct research is an investment with split purpose.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: 'My God, J, why?'
It was confusing to me.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Nonsense! snapped Tuppence.

Here is a hypothesis:
Tuppence didn't understand it.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell