All, Further to your recent discussions surrounding the ENA Origination Track I will shortly be scheduling an interview date for you to interview recommended candidates. You have already received the attached list of suggested candidates and as I understand it you have no comments on these individuals thus far. In order to match the success of the ENA Trading Track it requires your 100% commitment and participation in the following areas: 1. Interviewing 2. Training 3. Mentoring 4. Promotion of the Track I will contact each supervisor of the attached list of candidates to gain further feedback on these candidates, prior to contacting them, and ensure their respective buy-in. If you have any questions please call me. I look forward to working with you on this Track. Kind regards,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: ENA Origination Track
It's not looking good for getting back to you today on this - shaping up to be a very bad day and we need to coordinate with Credit for their responses as well. I have a call in to John Suttle and have forwarded the revised draft to him. We'll do what we can. I saw your reply to my previous note. On this one point: It strikes me as disingenuous to say that they don't have the internal systems for csa's with nonfinancial counterparties - the same systems would work for nonfinancial parties as well as financial parties. IBJ is the most sophisticated Japanese player in the derivative market and one would believe that they could handle the documentation for both financial and non-financial entities. I note, I have heard that it is not market practice for Japanese financial institutions to provide collateral to non-financial institutions, so it may be very difficult for them to alter their position. I understand. My view is just that it is probably not a systems issue but a position and it irks me to have the point made as a systems issue when it is not. As we both agree, the issue may be moot depending on what Credit thinks.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: IBJ
Beginning at noon today, Mark Taylor will be out of the office. He will return to work on Monday, October 22. Numbers to reach him are as follows:
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Mark Taylor - Out of Office
I would like to set up a brief meeting in the afternoon this week or next, to discuss increasing the liquidity in west basis on EOL. It would be helpful for our desk to sit down with John Arnold and John Lavorato to openly discuss the importance of continuing to increase liquidity on EOL. I would also like to put to rest the notion that increasing liquidity leads to negative P&L and that a Trader's support of EOL liquidity will go unrecognized at year end PRC. Please email me with a response of when we could set up such a meeting. Sincerely,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Increasing EOL liquidity in West Basis