Question: Sentence A: In 2001, county judges heard 98 Protection From Abuse cases, finding the defendant guilty in 48 percent of those cases, either after a hearing or through a technical violation or plea.

Sentence B: In 2001, no defendants were charged in Protection from Abuse cases.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Departures are from the Macau Ferry Terminal, just west of Central in the Shun Tak Centre, 200 Connaught Road, Central, in Hong Kong.
You can catch a ferry at a terminal due west of Central.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
and uh that's not good that's not good at all and uh

Here is a hypothesis:
That is bad.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: As shorter chronic tests were developed, it became common practice to apply the same terminology to the endpoints.

Sentence 2: Endpoints use the same terminology.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
That explains everything!

Does it follow that "Everything is explained, finally!"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Its restored lobby is Hong Kong's most elegant gathering place; afternoon tea here is a visitors' ritual.", can we conclude that "Visitors can always be found enjoying an afternoon tea in the restored lobby."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes