Sentence 1: The next morning, Ca'daan watched the four boys playing again.

Sentence 2: Ca'daan watched the four boys play the following evening.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
say i i i would think that um that that people like that i think inflammatory inflammatory politicians are um or or emotional politicians you know certain very vibrant politicians tend to bring crowds out i think i would hope

Does it follow that "I think that politicians who show their true feelings are more likeable."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If Is it possible, asks Livingstone, that Zapruder was a plant?, can we say that "Livingstone knew Zapruder was not a plant."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"For alternative measures including changes in the market value of households' existing assets, see William G. Gale and John Sabelhaus, Perspectives on the Household Saving Rate, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1:1999), pp. 181-224; and Richard Peach and Charles Steindel, A Nation of Spendthrifts?"
Hypothesis: Changing households market values is an alternative method.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: One important determinant of the effect on national saving is the funding source for the individual accounts. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Individual accounts would have the same effect on national savings, however they are funded."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Q: If One part each, lending each its own essential quality to the mixture, so that the sky is solid as earth, radiant as fire, formless as water, insubstantial as air., can we say that "Equal parts earth, fire, waster and air."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
yes