New time for tomorrow only! REMINDER -- The EGM Org. Post Petition Meeting will be held on Wednesday, February 6 at 9:00 am in conf. room ECN 30C1. Please plan to attend or use the dial-in number shown below:
Answer: REMINDER -- EGM Organizational Post Petition Meeting
Here is an email: Greetings All: If memory serves, our filing in California is due on Tuesday. Steve Bowen & Co. should be getting me a draft today based on our discussion a couple of weeks ago in Houston. Soon as I get it, I'll be distributing for review. Aim would be to have it in shape COB tomorrow. Thoughts? P.S. Some good news. Recall from our meeting a couple of weeks ago that I mentioned that there were some preliminary filings we had to make in Arizona (in order to transact business there) prior to filing for a CPCN. Well, I've spoken with Robin Hill, and those filings have already been made some time ago, so that's one less thing to worry about. Best,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: California Tariff Filing----How Time Flies
Q: Hi Ladies, I hope the meeting on Saturday was interesting and informative for you. Ginger was concerned that so many people left at noon when it was supposed to last until 1 pm, but I think we pretty much covered everything. In the notes I saw that it says "Awards, Yellow Rose Petal, 25 hours over the minimum. This is a new award." I just want to clarify that it is an award that our chapter asked for and is not a nation wide award. If you want to have it, your chapter will have to request it from National. Marymaryt@houston.rr.com
Propose a subject line
A: Yellow Rose Petal award
IN: Stacy: John had asked me to review a form of Guaranty from Alberta Energy Company Ltd. As it turns out, the Guarantor will be the counterparty on all financial trades so this Guaranty will only support physical deals done by Alberta's affiliates. I had commented on it and they had responded. Could you please take a look at their response and coordinate with John on this? Thanks.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Alberta Energy Guaranty
IN: This is an email
Mike - Both the options and the restricted stock vest 33.33% 1st, 2nd, and 3rd anniversary from grant date with a 5 year term. Also, I have requested the change to your agreement on the retention payments. Tim asked me to change the payment dates to the following: 4/1/02 4/1/03 4/1/04 He did not want to add any more to the signing payment per a conversation that he had with Lavo. I hope this works for you. Let me know if you need any more information! Amy

What is the subject?

OUT: Vesting Schedule of Options and Restricted Shares
What do you think about Russell's request for a confirm here? I think this is really confusing for our Canadian team. There must be requirements for the LC if it's an upfront LC, we would need a zero threshold. I just don't think this is very straight forward for these poor Candadian girls to figure out. What do you think?
Answer:
Pending transactions, Casco qy6450.1