Q: Given the sentence "A man (with a name tag on his shirt) is sitting in a printed cloth chair in what appears to be a hospital room." can we conclude that "A human with a shirt."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: yes
Chain-of-thought: There is a man which is a human whom is wearing a ton on his shirt meaning he is wearing a shirt.

Q: Can we conclude from "Two kids play hockey on a pond." that "There are kids playing hockey on the pond."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: yes
Chain-of-thought: On a pond and on the pond mean the same thing.

Q: Given the sentence "Young women taking a break from shopping." is it true that "Young women taking a break from shopping at the mall full of people."?
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: You can't imply they are at a mall full of people just because they are shopping.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Woman and kids having picnic in a park."
Hypothesis: "A family eating dinner in their home."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: no
Chain-of-thought:
The family are either in the park or at home but they cannot be in both places at the same time.