Question: Sentence A: Tens of millions of humans, as we know, willingly partake of marijuana, and these differences between rat and human behavior should discourage us from using two rat studies to assert that a) marijuana is addictive in the same way as harder drugs are and b) marijuana primes humans for addiction to harder drugs.

Sentence B: Millions of people take the marijuana drug.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: The second managed a scream before the huge blade hewed into his skull.
He was in a great deal of pain.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
You can go." The clerk withdrew, closing the door behind him.

Here is a hypothesis:
The clerk walked back inside and closed the door.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Tudjman is reportedly suffering from stomach cancer that has metastasized.

Sentence 2: It's said that Tudjman has stomach cancer that's traveled to other parts of his body.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
that would be nice

Does it follow that "That could never work out, it would be horrible."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "Detection of acute alcohol intoxication and chronic alcohol dependence by trauma center staff.", can we conclude that "The staff at the trauma center do not deal with chronic alcohol use."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no