input question: That's why the only logical explanation is typographical errors in the prospectus. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There were clear blatant obvious purposeful errors in the documents and this will not be overseen. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "Today, the National Park Authority and the National Trust work with the Cumbria County Council and professional bodies like the Lake District Tourism and Conservation Partnership to formulate sensible plans for the future.", can we conclude that "The National Trust did not work with the Cumbria county council today. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Ras Mohammed also protects the environment along the shoreline of the Sinai, including rare mangrove forests with abundant bird life.

Sentence B: The shoreline of the Sinai is all sand and desert.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: no especially when going to spend the next eighteen years in school
Definitley, especially when going to spend the next 18 years in school.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
From October to May, the summit is covered in snow and often closed to the public.

Here is a hypothesis:
The summit is usually closed from October to May due to weather.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question:
'Yes, he was!'

Does it follow that "Yes, he was in the newspaper!"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell