Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Comment: Thanks for trying, but those are one persons word against another, there's no hard evidence, you can choose to believe these allegations if you want, but I would suggest you're choosing to believe them because of your distaste for Trump, not because of any compelling evidence.

"Trump is privatizing the presidency. He is allowing his children to run the family business..." Ahh yes, you're favorite Democrat talking points. Does it ever strike you as odd that a man you are suggesting is an anti-semite is the same man you are convinced is allowing his two grown sons, who both married Jews, along with his Jewish son-in-law and Jewish Daughter, to "merge" their organization with the Presidency. Sounds like the type of conspiracy theory you'd hear from an anti-semite. Honestly, if Bannon authored what you just said, would you call it evidence of anti-semitism?
Non-insult