Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Maybe. At least there is accountability for vanity. Nothing that Springfield did just now, including the weird and massively expensive roundabouts project that suddenly is reversing a long held City policy not to confiscate private ownership in Glenwood through immanent domain has any meaningful public input or accountability. The consolidation happening is something that is being fast-tracked and pushed and is not spontaneously occurring from the economics of the situation or the economic good of the city or Glenwood. And, as a diversion, all this activity and private investment positioning is being fronted by a showcase CLT parking lot that purports to revitalize a timber economy that someone needs to acknowledge is not going to return anytime soon. At least Kitty Piercy cannot do things like this in a vacuum and I hope Eugene locates its new city hall by "recycling" the EWEB building at the river. A truly "carbon neutral" choice.
No