Here is an email: Karen: Here is our response to your e-mail comments: 1. We can put back VI(c)(i) but the reason that we deleted it was because the provisions in VI(c)(ii) and VI(E) really deal with how an LC can be drawn upon and the language in VI(c)(i) seemed unnecessary and perhaps inconsistent with those sections. If we put it back in, it should be made subject to those other sections. 2. With respect to your points regarding the amount that can be drawn, I am unclear as to what your position is. In one place you want to limit it to amounts owed and in another you want to limit it to Exposure Amount. What is your position. We thought that the formula that we set forth in Section 4(b) of the amendment was what everyone had agreed to. 3. The reason for the change in E.4. (c) is because the Event of Default situation has already been addressed in VI(c)(ii). 4. I need to check with our credit people regarding the transferability issue. I will note that the current form that is attached to the Master permits transfers. Why is this an issue with you? I look forward to hearing from you. My number is 713-853-3989. Carol
What is a potential subject line for this email?
Response to Comments