Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
Example: Comment: your posts shows you are stupid period
Output: Insult
This comment is insult because it is scornful and disrespectful.

New input case for you: Comment: Our stupid, rigid, and inconsiderate institutional Church again shows its inability to understand the Human condition. A bunch of celibate (or so they say) lawmakers in Rome wrote the rules for an optional-married Deaconate, and the results are what this story reports. I'll add another. I have a cousin, a wonderful man who is a semi-retired police officer, married for 40 years and had two children who are accomplished adults, and one is married with two children and very active in their parish as well. My cousin applied for and was accepted for the Deaconate program in our diocese. After about 3 months, he received a call from someone telling him he was rejected from the program. They at first refused to provide the reasons why: it took some time to learn that his wife, who was unable to adjust her work schedule, could not attend the required meetings for wives, and so they threw my cousin out. As if we have too many Deacons in the first place. Church idiots.
Output:
Insult