In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Example input: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Example output: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Example explanation: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.
Q: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

(a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ''Cancer Care
Planning and Communications Act of 2018''.
(b) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Cancer care in the United States is often described as
the best in the world because patients have access to many
treatment options, including cutting-edge therapies that save
lives and improve the quality of life.
(2) Access to the best treatment options is not equal
across all populations and in all communities. The 1999
Institute of Medicine report entitled ''The Unequal Burden of
Cancer'' found that low-income people often lack access to
adequate cancer care and that ethnic minorities have not
benefitted fully from cancer treatment advances.
(3) In addition, despite access to high-quality treatment
options for many, individuals with cancer often do not have
access to a cancer care system that incorporates shared
decision-making and the coordination of all elements of care.
(4) Cancer survivors often experience the under-diagnosis
and under-treatment of the symptoms of cancer and side effects
of cancer treatment, a problem that begins at the time of
diagnosis and may become more severe with disease progression
and at the end of life. The failure to treat the symptoms, side
effects, and late effects of cancer and cancer treatment may
have a serious adverse impact on the health, survival, well-
being, and quality of life of cancer survivors.
(5) Individuals with cancer often do not participate in a
shared decision-making process that considers all treatment
options and do not benefit from coordination of all elements of
active treatment and palliative care.
(6) Quality cancer care should incorporate access to
psychosocial services and management of the symptoms of cancer
and the symptoms of cancer treatment, including pain, nausea,
vomiting, fatigue, and depression.
(7) Quality cancer care should include a means for engaging
cancer survivors in a shared decision-making process that
produces a comprehensive care summary and a plan for follow-up
care after primary treatment to ensure that cancer survivors
have access to follow-up monitoring and treatment of possible
late effects of cancer and cancer treatment, including
appropriate psychosocial services.
(8) The Institute of Medicine report entitled ''Ensuring
Quality Cancer Care'' described the elements of quality care
for an individual with cancer to include--
(A) the development of initial treatment
recommendations by an experienced health care provider;
(B) the development of a plan for the course of
treatment of the individual and communication of the
plan to the individual;
(C) access to the resources necessary to implement
the course of treatment;
(D) access to high-quality clinical trials;
(E) a mechanism to coordinate services for the
treatment of the individual; and
(F) psychosocial support services and compassionate
care for the individual.
(9) In its report ''From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor:
Lost in Transition'', the Institute of Medicine recommended
that individuals with cancer completing primary treatment be
provided a comprehensive summary of their care along with a
follow-up survivorship plan of treatment.
(10) In ''Cancer Care for the Whole Patient'', the
Institute of Medicine stated that the development of a plan
that includes biomedical and psychosocial care should be a
standard for quality cancer care in any quality measurement
system.
(11) The Commission on Cancer has encouraged survivorship
care planning by making the development of such plans for
patients one of the standards of accreditation for cancer care
providers, but cancer care professionals report difficulties
completing the plans.
(12) Because more than half of all cancer diagnoses occur
among elderly Medicare beneficiaries, addressing cancer care
inadequacies through Medicare reforms will provide benefits to
millions of Americans. Providing Medicare beneficiaries more
routine access to cancer care plans and survivorship care plans
is a key to shared decisionmaking and better coordination of
care.
(13) Important payment and delivery reforms that
incorporate cancer care planning and coordination are already
being tested in the Medicare program; the Oncology Care Model
has been implemented in a number of oncology practices, and
additional models that will include care planning have been
proposed.
(14) The alternative payment models, including the Oncology
Care Model, provide access to cancer care planning for Medicare
beneficiaries who receive their cancer care in practices that
are part of the Oncology Care Model. Other Medicare
beneficiaries who are not enrolled in these delivery
demonstrations may not have access to a cancer care plan or
appropriate care coordination.
(15) The failure to provide a cancer care plan to patients
in many care settings relates in part to inadequate Medicare
payment for such planning and coordination services.
(16) Changes in Medicare payment for cancer care planning
and coordination will support shared decisionmaking that
reviews all treatment options and will contribute to improved
care for individuals with cancer from the time of diagnosis
through the end of the life. Medicare payment for cancer care
planning may begin a reform process that helps us realize the
well-planned and well-coordinated cancer care that has been
recommended by the Institute of Medicine/National Academy of
Medicine and that is preferred by cancer patients across the
Nation.

SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF CANCER CARE PLANNING AND COORDINATION SERVICES.

(a) In General.--Section 1861 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1395x) is amended--
(1) in subsection (s)(2)--
(A) by striking ''and'' at the end of subparagraph
(FF);
(B) by adding ''and'' at the end of subparagraph
(GG); and
(C) by adding at the end the following new
subparagraph:
''(HH) cancer care planning and coordination services (as
defined in subsection (jjj))''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:

''Cancer Care Planning and Coordination Services

''(jjj)(1) The term 'cancer care planning and coordination
services' means--
''(A) with respect to an individual who is diagnosed with
cancer, the development of a treatment plan by a physician,
nurse practitioner, or physician assistant that--
''(i) includes an assessment of the individual's
diagnosis, health status, treatment needs, functional
status, pain control, and psychosocial needs;
''(ii) engages the individual in a shared decision-
making process that reviews all treatment options;
''(iii) details, to the greatest extent practicable
all aspects of the care to be provided to the
individual with respect to the treatment of such
cancer, including any curative treatment, comprehensive
symptom management, and palliative care;
''(iv) is furnished in person, in written form, to
the individual within a period specified by the
Secretary that is as soon as practicable after the date
on which the individual is so diagnosed;
''(v) is furnished, to the greatest extent
practicable, in a form that appropriately takes into
account cultural and linguistic needs of the individual
in order to make the plan accessible to the individual;
and
''(vi) is in accordance with standards determined
by the Secretary to be appropriate;
''(B) with respect to an individual for whom a treatment
plan has been developed under subparagraph (A), the revision of
such treatment plan as necessary to account for any substantial
change in the condition of the individual, recurrence of
disease, changes in the individual's treatment preferences, or
significant revision of the elements of curative care or
symptom management for the individual, if such revision--
''(i) is in accordance with clauses (i), (ii), (iv)
and (v) of such subparagraph; and
''(ii) is furnished in written form to the
individual within a period specified by the Secretary
that is as soon as practicable after the date of such
revision;
''(C) with respect to an individual who has completed the
primary treatment for cancer, as defined by the Secretary, the
development of a follow-up survivorship care plan that--
''(i) includes an assessment of the individual's
diagnosis, health status, treatment needs, functional
status, pain control, and psychosocial needs;
''(ii) engages the individual in a shared decision-
making process that reviews all survivorship care
options;
''(iii) describes the elements of the primary
treatment, including symptom management and palliative
care, furnished to such individual;
''(iv) provides recommendations for the subsequent
care of the individual with respect to the cancer
involved;
''(v) is furnished, in person, in written form, to
the individual within a period specified by the
Secretary that is as soon as practicable after the
completion of such primary treatment;
''(vi) is furnished, to the greatest extent
practicable, in a form that appropriately takes into
account cultural and linguistic needs of the individual
in order to make the plan accessible to the individual;
and
''(vii) is in accordance with standards determined
by the Secretary to be appropriate; and
''(D) with respect to an individual for whom a follow-up
cancer care plan has been developed under subparagraph (C), the
revision of such plan as necessary to account for any
substantial change in the condition of the individual,
diagnosis of a second cancer, change in the individual's
preference for survivorship care, or significant revision of
the plan for follow-up care, if such revision--
''(i) is in accordance with clauses (i), (ii),
(iii), (v), and (vi) of such subparagraph; and
''(ii) is furnished in written form to the
individual within a period specified by the Secretary
that is as soon as practicable after the date of such
revision.
''(2) The Secretary shall establish standards to carry out
paragraph (1) in consultation with appropriate organizations
representing suppliers and providers of services related to cancer
treatment and organizations representing survivors of cancer. Such
standards shall include standards for determining the need and
frequency for revisions of the treatment plans and follow-up
survivorship care plans based on changes in the condition of the
individual or elements and intent of treatment and standards for the
communication of the plan to the individual.
''(3) In this subsection, the term 'shared decision-making process'
means, with respect to an individual, a process in which the individual
and the individual's health care providers consider the individual's
diagnosis, treatment options, the medical evidence related to treatment
options, the risks and benefits of all treatment options, and the
individual's preferences regarding treatment, and then jointly develop
and implement a treatment plan.''.
(b) Payment Under Physician Fee Schedule.--
(1) In general.--Section 1848(j)(3) of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-4(j)(3)) is amended by inserting ''(HH),''
after ''health risk assessment),''.
(2) Initial rates.--Unless the Secretary of Health and
Human Services otherwise provides, the payment rate specified
under the physician fee schedule under the amendment made by
paragraph (1) for cancer care planning and coordination
services shall be the same payment rate as provided for
transitional care management services (as defined in CPT code
99496).
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall
apply to services furnished on or after the first day of the first
calendar year that begins after the date of the enactment of this Act.
A:
Cancer Care Planning and Communications Act of 2018 This billprovides forMedicarecoverage and paymentof cancer care planning and coordination services.