In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
Q: Comment: Consider this: "I JUST KNOW in my heart/gut that Trump's divisive rhetoric makes him worse than the alternative."

Actually, you don't know that, you just believe that. It's based on a rather bizarre value system. Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama, for example, are responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent people (see: Rape of Libya). Yet somehow, you've rated Trump's harmless rhetoric, that has actually killed no one (yet), as more disqualifying than *actually* being responsible for the unjustified killing of thousands of innocent brown people in a foreign country. More so if we count Saudi Arabia's war in Yemen which both Hillary and Obama unapologetically backed.

Let that sink in for a moment Neil. You've judged Trump to be worse, based upon his refusal to conform to PC speech social norms, than people whom you KNOW to be responsible for innocent deaths. Is this a good value system? Have you ever questioned your value system, or your political beliefs even?
A:
Non-insult