Given a paragraph, generate a claim that is supported by the given paragraph. 1) The claim must contain information from within the paragraph. 2) A sentence within the paragraph can be used as a claim. 3) The claim should not have contradictions within the paragraph. 4) The claim should be at most one sentence long.
One example: "Although the story didn't cite the cost of appendectomy emergency or urgent surgery and we wish it had, we nonetheless will give it a satisfactory score because it at least cited what the editorial writer wrote, ""A secondary benefit is the savings to the hospital generated by minimizing staff and anesthesiologist presence late in the evening and during the wee hours of the morning."" As with our harms score above, although the story didn't give absolute numbers, in this case we think it was sufficient for it to report that ""The scientists found no significant difference among the groups in the patients' condition 30 days after surgery or in the length of their operation or hospital stay."" Although the story didn't give absolute numbers, in this case we think it was sufficient for it to report that ""The scientists found no significant difference among the groups in the patients' condition 30 days after surgery or in the length of their operation or hospital stay."" Despite running less than 300 words, this story did an adequate job in explaining the quality of the evidence, including pointing out limitations. No disease-mongering here. The story meets the bare minimum requirement for this criterion in that it at least cited what an editorial stated. The focus of the story was on a study comparing emergency appendectomy with surgery done up to 12 hours later or beyond. This is the whole focus of the story and one we applaud when it begins: ""Appendectomy is the most common emergency surgery in the world, but it doesn't have to be."" There were no claims made about the novelty of this research, and we may have wished for a bit more context on this. Nonetheless, the potential for guiding future care decisions was made clear. Not applicable. Given that the story only pulled excerpts from the journal article and the accompanying editorial, and didn't include any fresh quotes from interviews, we can't be sure of the extent to which it may have been influenced by a news release."
Solution is here: Some appendicitis cases may not require 'emergency' surgery
Explanation: The paragraph mentions that "Appendectomy is the most common emergency surgery in the world, but it doesn't have to be." which is considered evidence for the output. Thus, the output is a valid claim.

Now, solve this: "While the rest of the nation celebrated Mardi Gras on Feb. 12, official Washington was transfixed by a different spectacle: delivery of President Barack Obama's yearly State of the Union speech. Newly elected Congressman Dave Joyce watched the hour-long oration on the House of Representatives floor with his House and Senate colleagues and was up the next morning to discuss it with radio talk show host and Plain Dealer columnist Mike McIntyre on WCPN's ""The Sound of Ideas"" call-in program. The Russell Township Republican told McIntyre he heard plenty of familiar themes in Obama's speech, and said many of the president's solutions to problems ""seemed to involve more big government."" But Joyce said he was intrigued by Obama's call for providing high school students with a more technical education that will help them get better jobs after graduation. During the speech, Obama highlighted a school in Brooklyn, N.Y. that graduates students with both a high school diploma and an associates degree in computers or engineering. ""We need to better prepare our workforce for the jobs that we have,"" Joyce said. ""There are three million jobs that go vacant each month in this country, so the idea of trying to better prepare our children for the workforce by reforming high schools and stressing technical degrees in engineering, that is something that intrigues me. It's something that people in other districts hear from their people, who said we have difficulty finding competent workers."" PolitiFact was intrigued by Joyce's assertion that three million U.S. jobs go unfilled every month. Could that be that a nation with a 7.9 percent unemployment in January, 2013 actually has so many job openings? Joyce's press secretary referred us to monthly job openings reports produced by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. A Feb. 12 report that covered statistics from December 2012 said there were 3.6 million job openings on the last day of the year, a number that varied little throughout 2012. The report said that during 2012, hires totaled 51.8 million and separations totaled 50.0 million, yielding a net employment gain of 1.8 million. Reports the office issued for previous months in 2012 indicated there were 3.8 million job openings in June, 3.7 million job openings in November, October , July, May and March, 3.6 million openings in September and August, 3.5 million vacancies in January and February, and 3.4 million unfilled jobs in April, So why are there so many unfilled jobs? Employers maintain there's a skills gap, while some labor economists say that skilled workers desire more pay than employers want to provide. A Bloomberg.com article on the subject said U.S. companies have reported more than 3 million job openings every month since February 2011. The article quoted Anthony Carnevale, who heads the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce in Washington, D.C., saying there's a demand for workers with highly specific skills. The article described a growing skills gap as a global problem, quoting a McKinsey Global Institute study that said employers worldwide could face a shortage of 85 million high- and medium-skilled workers by 2020. It also highlighted a Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center program that helps unskilled workers train for better paid, skilled jobs in fields such as nursing. ""'Qualified' used to mean a high school degree,"" Carnevale told Bloomberg. ""Now the qualification level has gone up so they're pressing for better people."" A Nov. 11 segment on CBS News' ""60 Minutes"" said that manufacturers nationwide say the lack of skilled workers is the reason for hundreds of thousands of unfilled jobs. But it quoted management professor Peter Capelli of the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School of Business saying that if companies paid better, they might be able to get the higher skilled workers they say they need. ""This is a market. And so, you know, if you're not willing to pay more, don't expect to get better quality people,"" Capelli said. ""One of the things we know now is wages are not going up. In fact, they've been stagnant and some cases even declining over time. So where is the shortage?"" Capelli also noted that a generation ago, companies provided workers with the training they needed. ""Companies are now saying, for all kinds of reasons, ""We're not going to do it anymore,"" Capelli told ""60 Minutes."" ""And maybe they're right, they can't do it. But what they probably can't do is say, 'We're not going to do it, and it's your problem. It's your problem to provide us with what we need, Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer. You need to pay for this for us."" Alcoa Inc. CEO Klaus Kleinfeld provided a counterpoint to Capelli's views. Kleinfeld said he believes manufacturing jobs pay ""very, very well,"" and that Alcoa is making efforts to fill the skills gap as are many other businesses. Asked why there's still a skills gap if manufacturing is attempting to close it, Kleinfield replied: ""This is not a society where you can tell somebody what - where to go, or where to - what education to get, right?' Joyce's claim that 3 million jobs go vacant each month is accurate."
Solution:
There are 3 million jobs that go vacant each month in this country.