Problem: Here is a premise:
Had a set-to in the Jacks with a trooper.

Here is a hypothesis:
There was a trooper in the Jacks because he was stationed there.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: In fact, I'm afraid I only said that to be quite sure of getting in.

Sentence 2: I said that in order to make sure I'd get in.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Similarly, the Joint Federal Travel Regulations,7 applicable to members of

Does it follow that "The Joint Federal Travel Regulations can not be similarly used "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If there is somebody and i read uh i can't remember who it is but there's a really famous, can we say that "The person is definitely Tom Cruise."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"Declaring that cooperation in any form with this satanic government is sinful, Gandhi advocated the boycott of elections and the withdrawal of people from government office."
Hypothesis: Gandhi rooted for elections to be boycotted and government officers to withdraw themselves under the principle that cooperation with the government in every way was sinful.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: Now it needs to think more rigorously about how to do so.

Sentence 2: It doesn't need to think about the future.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no