Q: Greg: Can you help me answer this question? Also, we have been through our ISDA forms and had the following questions with respect to Canadian law matters? 1. We have assumed that for all ISDA Masters where Canadian law applies, we should not insert our arbitration provision. Is this correct? 2. With respect to the Trade Option exemption and Eligible Swap Participant reps that we normally insert in our form (which I have enclosed below), we have assumed that the only time that these reps should not be inserted is when the Master is between ECC and a Canadian or Foreign counterparty? Is this correct? What we are unsure about is whther these reps are needed when ECC's counterparty is a US entity. We look forward to hearing from you. Carol
Propose a subject line
A: ISDA Securities Rep

Q: Alicia The only comment that I have to the swap schedules is that I think we need to have an exception built into the arbitration language that permits us to go to court to enforce the remedies that we describe in the confidentiality section. This probably hold true for all of the docs where we have arbitration and a ca provision. Alos, there may be some defined terms that are now used in the new confidentiality language that haven't been defined (i.e, Enron, Enron Put Agreement etc) Finally, should we upper case "affiliates" in the confidentiality language and either use the ISDA def or some other def? Carol
Propose a subject line
A: Comments

Q: Randy: Enclosed is a draft of the ETA letter that has been approved by the head of the online group. Sorry that this took so long. CArol
Propose a subject line
A: ETA Letter

Q: Gentlemen, What's happening with the above deal ? The term is 11/01/01 - 03/31/02, I can see the volume has been changed to 0 - is this only temporarily or has this deal been killed ? We show this deal as Pending and I wanted to remind you that we have never confirmed this transaction. Please advise. Regards,
Propose a subject line
A:
Colorado Springs Utilities - Sitara # 889014