You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. The four incorrect answers are other holding statements. You should find the correct option. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.

resistance, temperature, barorqetric pressure, engine age, associated cylinder compres sion ratio, ambient air conditions, and the like. '258 Patent 11:6-25. Column 11 is simply a list of input factors with no disclosure on the relationship of any of these factors to glow plug energization. Merely stating that the inputs could be "interactively adapted" fails to inform how any of these inputs relate to one another. Although the listed variables may affect temperature and voltage variables depicted in Chart 1 and Figure 2, the listed variables Plaintiffs cite in Column 11 are not themselves algorithms. The Federal Circuit, has rejected the notion that a list of variables alone without a disclosed relationship could constitute a disclosed algorithm. See Ibor-meith, 732 F.3d at 1381 (<HOLDING>). Although Plaintiffs note that the description
Holding statements: (A) recognizing same factors (B) recognizing that among other factors the location and level of the precedent as well as its age are important factors in a qualified immunity analysis (C) holding that judgment calls on the weight to be given various relevant factors are for the sentencing court not for this court (D) holding that a list of identified factors related to detecting driver drowsiness in a sleep monitoring program does not amount to an algorithm when there is no disclosure of even a single concrete relationship between the various factors that are used to compute an outcome to warn of driver drowsiness (E) holding that the district court is not required to state on the record that it has explicitly considered each of the 3553a factors or to discuss each of the 3553a factors
Output:
(D)