Q: If New Yorker writer Remnick's sequel to his Pulitzer Prize-winning Lenin's Tomb is a compelling postscript (Walter Laqueur, Los Angeles Times ). Reviewers focus on Remnick's access to political insiders, especially his extended interviews with Mikhail Gorbachev, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, and Gennady Zyuganov., can we say that "Remnicks newest sequal was written very well"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"Parc Ast??rix"
Hypothesis: Disneyland
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: In an editorial Friday, the Daily Telegraph , a conservative paper, made fun of a splendid correction published in the liberal Guardian the day before. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The Daily Telegraph is a daily paper."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "So deep did he think that he neither saw, nor heard, nor felt anything until the tip of the blade touched the side of his neck.", can we conclude that "He felt nothing, saw nothing, heard nothing. Not even when he was punctured by the blade. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: They are heeding the call of a growing pool of law schools, which are for the first time pointing graduates in a new direction and teaching them how to get there.

Sentence B: The law schools had some of the highest tuition in the world.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: The building is being restored, but its future purpose remains undecided.

Sentence B: They have not decided the way the store will be repurposed.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes