Question:
That was our way of showing, to ourselves especially, that we were intimates of those eminent locations.

Does it follow that "We had never been to any of those places and had little knowledge of them."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If i probably wouldn't and i've lived here all of my life, can we say that "I probably wouldn't eat the grass and I have lived here all my life."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"They could cover twice as many stories if they simply inserted yadda yadda yadda into their reports."
Hypothesis: They would cover half the reports if they used fluff.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: uh we're supposed to be talking about houses though right well i run the business in my home If this premise is true, does that tell us:"I operate a business from my home."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "22 Also, there are cases where merchandise is treated different from non-merchandise and where, under the MBMFC rule discussed above, some kinds of content may use one subclass and not others.", can we conclude that "All types of non-merchandise were treated in the same manner."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

input question: Neither the latitude for government speech nor its rationale applies to subsidies for private speech in every instance, however. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Government speech applies to private speech."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer:
it is not possible to tell