Question:
Based on the premise "Jon continued to examine him instead.", can we conclude that "Jon pretended to examine him."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: unless the people have proof that they're leaving that they're not going to stay

Sentence B: If we can see proof that those people are getting out of the country then those people are not going to stay.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: The Bugis in Johor's administration provided much of the spirit in that State's independent stand in the 19th and 20th centuries.
The Bugis in Johor's administration was against independence and sought to give India to the British.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
noodles and pasta and such

Here is a hypothesis:
No one kinds of noodles.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: The GAO senior executive official responsible for the completion of the engagement, along with the staff that performed

Sentence 2: The person in charge of the completion of the engagement is the GAO senior executive.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"i will get on it one day and see if i can uh um what what do they win they they win money i think don't they"
Hypothesis: I will have to find out if they win money.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell