IN: This is an email
Kay please forward to Max Yzaguirre. Max, congrats on the Decero PPA - we need to wrestle up another 100 to 200 MW. This should be a priority given the profit potential of this deal as per Oz and Doug (+50M in 2000). Is there an ability to let Sabine or Irvin run with Vitro and get your attention on this item asap. I know that the Monterrey project is eating into your time. Do we need to augment your resources? On a different note, the current Monterrey control budget is showing a $5.3M negative variance from the original control budget. Is this accurate? Does this reduce the profitability or is it absorbed by the PPA's? Regards

What is the subject?

OUT: Various
QUESTION: Amy has additional questions from John Koomey: 1. Can we change the wording in Section 3.a to "$2,500.00 per one-day course, plus the actual price of course books... 2. Can we delete the last sentence in Section 3b? (Examples of acceptable forms...) 3. Does Section 5 mean Koomey can present his (math and calculation class) to other companies as long as he does not refer to Enron, does not use Enron teaching examples, and does not use use / disclose any Enron-specific information? Thanks.... I'm printing these questions and I have pulled the Agreement for you to look at.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Analytics Press (John Koomey Consulting Agreement)
FYI. As part of our defense against the UC/CSU suit, I've been asked to provide a declaration. The gist of the declaration is that the future of Direct Access in California is very uncertain. Best,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Declaration for UC/CSU Suit
Debbie and Tanya: At our group meeting this morning, the general consensus was that we should continue to send margin letters to those counterparties that have not yet terminated. Can Harlan and I meet with you sometime this afternoon to talk about this so that we can keep track of what is being done? Anytime after 1 works for me.
Answer: Margin Letters
Here is an email: Attached for your review and comments is a revised version of the TransPecos LOI. This version (which reflects comments received from Kim and Mark this afternoon) is red-lined to show changes from the version that I circulated earlier in the week. It's my understanding that we'll be meeting on this at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, January 22.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: TransPecos LOI
QUESTION: JM, The message below is related to deal #138094. According to Joan, October is the last month for this deal. However, the evergreen flag is activated in Sitara and a new line has been created for November. Can you look into this please? D
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Swift - OCTOBER 2000 Vols