In this task, you need to write an incorrect answer to the given question. Along with the question, you are also given the correct answer(s) and the associated paragraph. An incorrect answer should be closely related to the content of the paragraph and/or the question but will not truthfully answer the question. Your incorrect answers should be similar to the given correct answer such that it will pose a challenge for students to distinguish the two. A good incorrect answer should prevent those who skip the paragraph from answering the question. The incorrect answer should not be trivial, in the sense that they should not be easily eliminated without reading the paragraph.

Ex Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: Pester came running into the room.
Sent 2: He came to a fast stop when he saw the dog.
Sent 3: He'd seen a dog before, every cat has, and he used to live with a black dog named Henry, but he'd never seen a brown one before.
Sent 4: It seemed strange to him, but not as strange as it was to see Linda the brown chicken in the living room last spring.
Sent 5: That still confused him.
Sent 6: He thought he liked this dog, not because of the color, but because it was small.
Sent 7: And it was so hairy.
Sent 8: It was a like a mop that could run around.
Sent 9: He jumped on his favorite chair and looked down as Maggie ran under it.
Sent 10: She was kind of cute for a dog, Pester thought to himself.
Sent 11: He layed down on the chair and pawed at her as she ran in a circle under it.
Sent 12: He tapped her ears as she went by, and waved his tail like a flag trying to get her attention.
Sent 13: After a little more of this, Pester curled up in a ball on the chair and took a nap.
Question: Was Pester already familiar with dogs when he came running into the room?.

Ex Output:
Not at all.

Ex Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: Amateur tennis star Guy Haines wants to divorce his vulgar and unfaithful wife Miriam , so he can marry the elegant and beautiful Anne Morton , daughter of a senator .
Sent 2: While on a train to meet Miriam , Haines meets Bruno Anthony , a forward stranger who recognizes Guy from gossip items in the newspapers that detail his marital problems .
Sent 3: During lunch in Bruno's compartment , Bruno tells Guy about his idea for the perfect '' Criss-cross '' murder : he will kill Miriam and in exchange , Guy will kill Bruno's father .
Sent 4: Since both are strangers , otherwise unconnected , there is no identifiable motive for the crimes , Bruno contends , hence no suspicion .
Sent 5: Guy hurriedly leaves the compartment but leaves Bruno thinking he has agreed to the deal .
Sent 6: Guy accidentally leaves his cigarette lighter behind , a gift from Anne to Guy , Which Bruno pockets .
Sent 7: Bruno heads to Guy's hometown of Metcalf and follows Miriam and her two beaux to an amusement park , where he briefly illuminates her face with Guy's lighter , then strangles her to death .
Sent 8: Guy's problems begin when his alibi an inebriated college professor on the same train as Guy can not remember their meeting .
Sent 9: But they increase exponentially when Bruno makes repeated appearances into Guy's life as he seeks to remind Guy that he is now obliged to kill Bruno's father , according to the bargain he thinks they struck on the train .
Sent 10: Bruno sends Guy the keys to his house , a map to his father's room , and a pistol .
Sent 11: Soon after , Bruno appears at a party at Senator Morton's house and hobnobs with the guests , much to Guy's apprehension and Anne's increasing suspicion .
Question: What are the things given by Bruno to kill his father?.

Ex Output:
Cigarette lighter.

Ex Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: Iwasaki's careful respect for the Long Beach program and its lawyers earned him the political capital he needed to complete his takeover in a matter of weeks.
Sent 2: "The Long Beach program had strong support in the community so in a situation like that, one has to recognize that it's not like a takeover where I have all the answers and I know best," Iwasaki said.
Sent 3: "The people in the community who are working there have the contacts and the knowledge that will allow service to continue."Sent 4: Things have gone less smoothly across town.
Sent 5: There, Dudovitz, a longtime poverty lawyer and executive director of the San Fernando Valley's 36-year-old legal aid program, continues to struggle with his hostile takeover of the neighboring San Gabriel-Pomona Valleys service area one year after it was accomplished.
Sent 6: On the bright side, Dudovitz has extended his respected program to clients in the San Gabriel-Pomona Valley, and he now operates on a much larger budget, $6.5 million last year.
Sent 7: However, his clash with the old San Gabriel program resulted in litigation, bitter feelings and a mission that some say is not clearly focused on serving poor people.
Sent 8: "It was a difficult situation that was probably mishandled by everyone," a longtime observer of the public interest community said of the San Fernando Valley-San Gabriel-Pomona Valley merger.
Sent 9: "There are very few people who come out as the heroes.
Sent 10: Personalities got involved when they shouldn't have.
Sent 11: Things were said that caused bad feelings and couldn't be unsaid."Sent 12: Iwasaki's merger with the smaller, 48-year-old Long Beach program was friendly and fast, and no one - not even Long Beach board members - lost a job.
Sent 13: When it was over, Iwasaki had $1 million more in federal dollars and two new offices.
Sent 14: Long Beach clients regained services they had lost years ago when federal budget cuts and dwindling grants reduced the staff of 15 lawyers to five and cut immigration and consumer law programs.
Sent 15: Iwasaki said, "[I judged the transition] better than I could have hoped for.".
Question: During federal budget cuts, the number of lawyers were reduced from 15 to how many?.

Ex Output:
15.