Q: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
Comment: While I agree that the Proud Boys are by definition misogynistic, it's not the thing to go after in this case. I would question their sincerity in sticking up for Cornwallis as I am absolutely certain that they are not serious, and if they were just how crazy does that make them. They say that they're not anti- this, that and the other thing but their actions at the Cornwallis statue clearly reveal that they don't like Canada's indigenous peoples. The rubbish about sticking up for Cornwallis is just a smokescreen, they got what they wanted by turning the event sour and by getting their moment of infamy in the press. Clearly, the Royal Canadian Navy is not on their side and they'll be lucky if they're not court martialled.
A:
Non-sexual-explicit