Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example is below.
Q: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
A: Yes
Rationale: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: Agreed, you left out the part about how we are entering a recession but our legislature continues to bury its collective head in the sand. They continue to believe oil prices will rebound and save the state, and why shouldn't they, I mean it's happened many times in the past right? Yes indeed it has, but that was when we were pumping millions of barrels of oil a day and only needed $50 or $60 a barrel to balance the budget, not the $100+ a barrel were hoping for now.

They refuse to believe it because they know that implementing a more balanced state revenue stream would require some form of taxes. Taxes would likely spell the end of many political careers, so we are left with a bunch of ostriches in Juneau with their heads in the sand.......
A:
Yes