You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

However, recent work has found that many NLI datasets contain biases, or annotation artifacts, i.e., features present in hypotheses that enable models to perform surprisingly well using only the hypothesis, without learning the relationship between two texts BIBREF2 , BIBREF3 , BIBREF4 . For instance, in some datasets, negation words like "not" and "nobody" are often associated with a relationship of contradiction. As a ramification of such biases, models may not generalize well to other datasets that contain different or no such biases.
Question: Is such bias caused by bad annotation?
Output:
No