IN: Hi Michelle, Have you spoken with the fair employment attorney in Montreal yet? Please let me know if we will be able to roll out a similar voluntary separation program in Montreal. Thanks

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Canadian Legal Determination

IN: On October 2, I, Aaron Klem and our outside attorney, Jeanne Bennett, met with other ESPs, the utilities, and the Energy Division staff of the CPUC to hammer out an agreement on implementing the CPUC's order suspending direct access (DA) and handling continued submission of DASRs. It was news to the utilities that ESPs have many contracts -- most several years old -- that allow for addition and subtraction of facilities throughout the contract term. The utilities had thought that cutting off DASRs would be the best way to enforce the CPUC's order without having to review contracts (which they don't want to do). After much discussion and debate, the participants agreed to make a joint filing at the CPUC seeking quick action.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: ESP/UDC/CPUC Meeting on Implementation of DA Suspension

IN: Hi there, I made some revisions to the language Rose proposed. Here are some questions/comments: I deleted the references to changing any delegation of rights/obligations. = =20 I'm not yet clear as to what the agency language will look like, and what= =20 rights we need/want to change (i) the identity of the agent (ii) the role o= f=20 the agent (iii) whether the agency can be terminated. I'm just not that=20 familiar with the structure yet, but if I can get that information, I'll wo= rk=20 on it.=20 I suggest we consider using a credit rating instead of "substantially=20 similiar" comparison. Just easier to decipher. Rose/Lisa, I've added some SPV language. I'm added receipt of final payment as an exception to the credit rating=20 standard. In other words, if they have received their final payment, they= =20 can't use credit as a reason to not give consent. I don't think we should agree to provide a list of power projects done by t= he=20 assignee in the past 5 years. I also think 3 years is a bit much on audite= d=20 financials, but I didn't comment there. I don't like their language that an affiliate must be intending to=20 own/operate the plant. I've just bracketed the langauge and added=20 "construct", since I don't know if this point has already been agreed. Enough explanation, here it is (with Word file attached below): Except for as described in Section ___ [ next paragraph], neither Party sha=

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Turbine assignment clause

IN: KLAY@ENRON.COM Invited CE World authors, Many of you have heard by now that ASCE is hosting the 1st Virtual World Congress for Civil Engineering, CE World (www.ceworld.org). The call-for-content was issued earlier this summer and the deadline for submission was September 27, 2001. Although this deadline has passed, we are still accepting contributions. Go to "Submit Abstracts" on the CE World web site. As Content Area Manager for the Geo-Technology area, I invite you to visit their website to find out more and to submit a contribution. Most content is expected to be in the form of papers, although you are challenged to "think outside the box" by including other forms of media. Remember this is a virtual conference-you do not need to attend; you visit the Congress from the web. This is a good opportunity to show case your work without having to travel to present it.

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
CE World Call for Content