Question: Sentence A: it's Olympic size yes

Sentence B: No, it is gladiator size.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Stephanopoulos rephrased the rape charge as a question about the relevance of candidates' private lives.
Stephanopoulous emphasized that the rape charge must be considered at face value.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Is bestiality, that perpetual urban smirk at rural life, actually prevalent in Nebraska and Wyoming?

Here is a hypothesis:
Does bestiality exist in Nebraska and Wyoming?

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: well across the stream there's a fallen log that you have to walk across to get into this little place and i'm crossing over the top of this thing it's snowing the thing is slippery and of course i slipped and fell in

Sentence 2: The log was slippery, but there's no way I would fall.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
All we've done is checked that the first two creditors divided their collective share of $125 appropriately

Does it follow that "The creditors are not allocating their shares correctly."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "The groups also plan to enlist more pro bono attorneys through coordination with the Utah State Bar.", can we conclude that "The groups decided they did not need more pro bono employees."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no