In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.

[Q]: Context: In a recent intervention study, the daily supplementation with 200 mg monomeric and oligomeric flavanols (MOF) from grape seeds for 8 weeks revealed a vascular health benefit in male smokers. The objective of the present study was to determine the impact of MOF consumption on the gene expression profile of leukocytes and to assess changes in DNA methylation.', "Gene expression profiles were determined using whole genome microarrays (Agilent) and DNA methylation was assessed using HumanMethylation450 BeadChips (Illumina). MOF significantly modulated the expression of 864 genes. The majority of the affected genes are involved in chemotaxis, cell adhesion, cell infiltration or cytoskeleton organisation, suggesting lower immune cell adhesion to endothelial cells. This was corroborated by in vitro experiments showing that MOF exposure of monocytes attenuates their adhesion to TNF--stimulated endothelial cells. Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-B) reporter gene assays confirmed that MOF decrease the activity of NF-B. Strong inter-individual variability in the leukocytes' DNA methylation was observed. As a consequence, on group level, changes due to MOF supplementation could not be found.\Question: Do dietary flavanols modulate the transcription of genes associated with cardiovascular pathology without changes in their DNA methylation state?
[A]: Our study revealed that an 8 week daily supplementation with 200 mg MOF modulates the expression of genes associated with cardiovascular disease pathways without major changes of their DNA methylation state. However, strong inter-individual variation in leukocyte DNA methylation may obscure the subtle epigenetic response to dietary flavanols. Despite the lack of significant changes in DNA methylation, the modulation of gene expression appears to contribute to the observed vascular health effect of MOF in humans.

[Q]: Context: Mucosal human papillomaviruses (HPV) are a major cause of cancers and papillomas of the anogenital and oropharyngeal tract. HPV-vaccination elicits neutralising antibodies in sera and cervicovaginal secretions and protects uninfected individuals from persistent anogenital infection and associated diseases caused by the vaccine-targeted HPV types. Whether immunisation can prevent oropharyngeal infection and diseases and whether neutralising antibodies represent the correlate of protection, is still unclear.', 'We determined IgG and neutralising antibodies against low-risk HPV6 and high-risk HPV16/18 in sera and oral fluids from healthy females (n=20) before and after quadrivalent HPV-vaccination and compared the results with non-vaccinated controls.', 'HPV-vaccination induced type-specific antibodies in sera and oral fluids of the vaccinees. Importantly, the antibodies in oral fluids were capable of neutralising HPV pseudovirions in vitro, indicating protection from infection. The increased neutralising antibody levels against HPV16/18 in sera and oral fluids post-vaccination correlated significantly within an individual.\Question: Does human papillomavirus vaccination induce neutralising antibodies in oral mucosal fluids?
[A]: We provide experimental proof that HPV-vaccination elicits neutralising antibodies to the vaccine-targeted types in oral fluids. Hence, immunisation may confer direct protection against type-specific HPV infection and associated diseases of the oropharyngeal tract. Measurement of antibodies in oral fluids represents a suitable tool to assess vaccine-induced protection within the mucosal milieu of the orophayrynx.

[Q]: Context: The present study was conducted to determine whether preservation of the right atrial appendage lessens the decrease of plasma atrial natriuretic peptide levels after the maze procedure and whether the increase of plasma atrial natriuretic peptides improves the ability of the kidneys to excrete the fluid load after the operation.', 'We evaluated 42 patients who underwent the maze procedure. The right atrial appendage was preserved in 22 patients but not in 20. Blood samples were obtained before and after the operation for measurement of atrial natriuretic peptides. To evaluate the influence of atrial natriuretic peptides on the ability of the kidneys, we also measured body weight, fluid balance, and the doses of furosemide and dopamine administered after the operation.', 'The restoration to sinus rhythm at 1 month after was comparable in the two groups. Plasma atrial natriuretic peptide levels significantly increased after the operation in patients in whom the right atrial appendage was preserved (1 day after: 23.4 +/- 17.8 vs 3 days after: 42.7 +/- 23.6 and 7 days after: 36.3 +/- 23.7 pg/mL, P <.05) but not in patients in whom the right atrial appendage was not preserved (1 day after: 20.0 +/- 19.6, 3 days after: 28.5 +/- 19.3, and 7 days after: 23.0 +/- 16.1 pg/mL). Furthermore, plasma atrial natriuretic peptide levels were significantly lower in patients in whom the right atrial appendage was not preserved than in patients in whom the right atrial appendage was preserved at 3 and 7 days after the operation. The fluid balance during the first 7 days of the postoperative period was comparable in the two groups, although the total dose of dopamine used in the same period was significantly smaller in patients in whom the right atrial appendage was preserved than in patients in whom the right atrial appendage was not preserved (155.3 +/- 119.0 vs 244.9 +/- 129.0 microg/kg, P <.05).\Question: Does preservation of the right atrial appendage improve reduced plasma atrial natriuretic peptide levels after the maze procedure?
[A]:
The present study showed that preservation of the right atrial appendage lessens the decrease of plasma atrial natriuretic peptide levels after the maze procedure and that increased plasma atrial natriuretic peptides may improve the ability of the kidneys to excrete the fluid load after the operation.