IN: This is an email
Market Participants: There is one correction to the version mapping below. April 4, 2001 should be Version 4 minus Version 1. This was one day when we had an overwrite problem. The version 1 for this day is what ties out to the original bill and supplemental invoice. The supplemental invoice consisted of changes on 4/4, 4/10, 4/11, 4/13, and 4/18 through 4/30.

What is the subject?

OUT: April 2001 Advisory Statement Mapping

IN: This is an email
As you may have become aware, the company received notice yesterday that you have been named as defendants (along with Enron Corp., Ken Lay, Jeff Skilling, Andy Fastow, and Arthur Andersen) in one of the federal securities class actions. I will forward to you a copy of the Complaint. We are in the process of determining who would be the most effective counsel for you. If you wish to have separate representation, please let me know. I cannot guarantee that the D&O carrier will reimburse you for the cost of separate counsel. I am setting up a meeting with counsel for Enron Corp., Susman & Godfrey, to discuss this litigation with you as soon as possible. Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions. Thank you.

What is the subject?

OUT: Securities Litigation

IN: This is an email
Please find attached a draft agreement for the purchase of EPMI's position with Santa Clara. Peter Meier <<Purchase Agreement ver1.doc>> PG&E National Energy Group and any other company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the regulated California utility. Neither PG&E National Energy Group nor these other referenced companies are regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission. Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company do not have to buy products from these companies in order to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

What is the subject?

OUT:
Santa Clara Purchase