In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[EX Q]: Comment: I believe the respected British economist Sir Paul Collier has noted that the net economic benefits for developed countries resulting from large scale immigration are marginal and that the impacts tend to be unfairly differential in that they benefit the already wealthy and hurt those, including other recent immigrants, who are nearer the bottom of the economic ladder.
[EX A]: Agree

[EX Q]: Comment: That is very good advice from a practical guy from Alberta. Bravo! Totally agree. So I'll say it again, get rid of wasteful practices instead of more revenue to continue wasteful practices (another example - the spectacular failure of the federal payroll system and IBM blundering on, without penalty).
[EX A]: Agree

[EX Q]: Comment: I had a 'roll my eyes' moment reading your post.

The problem with die-hard political hacks such as yourself is that you are content to use tired cliches that don't really correspond to reality.

Have you at all been paying attention to the province's labour negotiations with its various unions? I don't think they are on very good terms with most of these 'public sector unions'.
[EX A]:
Disagree