Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
Example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Output: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

New input case for you: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Armed Forces Reserve and National
Guard Dual-Status Review and Modernization Act''.

SEC. 2. POSTPONEMENT OF DEADLINE FOR COMPLETION OF CONVERSION OF
CERTAIN MILITARY TECHNICIAN (DUAL STATUS) POSITIONS TO
POSITIONS OF CIVILIAN EMPLOYMENT BY THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) A September 2013 study conducted by a federally funded
research and development center found that 21 percent of the
military technician (dual status) positions are administrative
in nature--the largest category as a percentage of military
technician (dual status) positions. The study recommends
investigation on whether ''some Dual Status MilTech positions
supporting general administration functions could be converted
to Title 5 Federal civilian full-time support positions without
compromising unit readiness''. The study further recommends
investigation on whether ''it is more appropriate to use
military full-time support for other reasons (such as currency
in military operations and training and augmentation)''.
(2) Section 1053 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2016 directs the conversion of not fewer than
20 percent of all military technician positions to positions of
Federal civilian employment under title 5, United States Code,
by January 1, 2017. Section 1084 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 extends the deadline for
that conversion from January 1, 2017, to October 1, 2017.
(3) The Department of Defense submitted a report on the
management of military technicians in December 2016 that finds
that 12.6 percent of the military technician (dual status)
positions were administrative in nature, and recommended a
conversion of 4.8 percent of such positions to positions of
Federal civilian employment.
(4) The Chief of the National Guard Bureau testified before
Congress in April 2017 that a conversion of 20 percent of
military technician (dual status) positions to positions of
Federal civilian employment would degrade readiness, but that a
lower number could be converted with minimal impact. The Chief
of the National Guard Bureau also testified that the Department
of Defense had not conducted an analysis of the associated
costs and benefits of a conversion of 20 percent of military
technician (dual status) positions to positions of Federal
civilian employment.
(b) Postponement of Deadline for Completion of Conversion.--
Notwithstanding the deadline otherwise specified in paragraph (1) of
section 1053(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2016 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) for the completion of the conversion of
military technician positions as described in that subsection, the
deadline for the completion of such conversion shall be 180 days after
the date on which the Secretary of Defense transmits to Congress under
paragraph (6) of subsection (c) the report of the working group
required by paragraph (5) of that subsection.
(c) Working Group on Full Time Support of the Reserve Components.--
(1) In general.--There shall be established in the
Department of Defense a working group to be known as the
''Working Group on Full Time Support of the Reserve
Components'' (in this subsection referred to as the ''working
group'').
(2) Co-chairs.--The co-chairs of the working group shall be
the following:
(A) The Director of the Army National Guard.
(B) The Director of the Air National Guard.
(C) The Chief of the Army Reserve.
(D) The Chief of the Air Force Reserve.
(3) Members.--The members of the working group shall
include the co-chairs of the working group and such other
personnel of the Department of Defense as the Secretary shall
appoint from among organizations and elements of the Department
with an interest in full time support of the reserve components
of the Armed Forces, including the National Guard Bureau and
the Adjutants General of the States.
(4) Duties.--The working group shall undertake a
comprehensive review of full time support of the reserve
components of the Armed Forces, including the following:
(A) An identification of the missions, purposes,
and objectives of military technicians (dual status) in
support of an operational reserve force.
(B) A review of the posture of current military
technician (dual status) positions, and of their
current role in meeting the objectives identified
pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(C) An analysis of potential restructurings of the
workforce of military technicians (dual status) in
order to identify a restructuring that fully aligns
military technician (dual status) positions with
objectives for full time support of the reserve
components.
(D) An identification of the military technician
(dual status) positions whose conversion to positions
of Federal civilian employment under title 5, United
States Code, would best ensure the achievement of
objectives for full time support of the reserve
components.
(E) An assessment of the impact on the readiness of
the National Guard for domestic operations of the
conversion of positions identified pursuant to
subparagraph (D) as described in that subparagraph.
(F) An assessment of costs and potential savings
associated with the conversion of positions identified
pursuant to subparagraph (D) as described in that
subparagraph.
(5) Report to secretary of defense.--Not later than 180
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the working
group shall submit to the Secretary of Defense a report on the
comprehensive review undertaken pursuant to paragraph (4). The
report shall include the following:
(A) A comprehensive description of the review and
the results of the review.
(B) The percentage of military technician (dual
status) positions whose conversion to positions of
Federal civilian employment under title 5, United
States Code, would best ensure the achievement of
objectives for full time support of the reserve
components of the Armed Forces as an operational
reserve.
(C) A transition plan for implementing a new force
structure for full time support of the reserve
components, including for the conversion of positions
as described in subparagraph (B) which mitigates any
risks to readiness identified pursuant to paragraph
(4)(E).
(D) Recommendations for the reform of personnel
management policy for military technician (dual status)
positions that address--
(i) the eligibility of military technicians
(dual status) for civilian retirement upon
retirement from the Armed Forces; and
(ii) the process for appealing employment
decisions.
(E) Recommendations for reforms of compensation and
benefits policies for military technician (dual status)
positions in order to provide military technicians
(dual status) with parity in compensation and benefits
with other Federal civilian employees of the Department
of Defense under title 5, United States Code.
(6) Transmittal of report to congress.--The Secretary shall
transmit to the congressional defense committees the report of
the working group under paragraph (5), together with such
discussion and recommendations in connection with the report as
the Secretary considers appropriate. The Secretary shall
publish the report, and any such discussions and
recommendations, in the Federal Register at the time of
transmittal.
(7) Congressional defense committees defined.--In this
subsection, the term ''congressional defense committees'' has
the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10,
United States Code.
Output:
Armed Forces Reserve and National Guard Dual-Status Review and Modernization Act This bill postpones the deadline for conversion of at least 20% of all military technician (dual status) positions to positions of civilian employment in the federal government until 180 days after the Department of Defense transmits to Congress the report of the Working Group on Full Time Support of the Reserve Components, established by this bill. The working group shall undertake a comprehensive review of full-time support of the reserve components of the Armed Forces, including: an identification of the missions, purposes, and objectives of military technicians (dual status) in support of an operational reserve force; a review of the posture of such positions and their role in meeting such objectives; an analysis of potential workforce restructuring to fully align such positions with objectives for full-time support of the reserve components; an identification of such positions the conversion of which to federal civilian positions would best ensure the achievement of such objectives; an assessment of the impact of such conversion on the readiness of the National Guard for domestic operations; and an assessment of costs and potential savings associated with such conversion.