Premise:
"Part of India's legacy after several centuries of bureaucracy (don't just blame the British civil service it began long before) is an inordinate respect for the written document and the rubber stamp."
Hypothesis: The disdain for the written document is part of India's legacy.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: Cherpitel screened an ED population with questions from CAGE, BMAST, AUDIT, and TWEAK. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Cherpitel used questions from CAGE and AUDIT to screen an ED population."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "'You've got to be kidding.'", can we conclude that "You're pulling my leg about that."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Studies on alcohol interventions in emergency departments should consume a proportionate amount of research dollars.

Sentence B: Alcohol studies should have money spent on them in relation to the problem.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: that uh that you you know you never get a chance to read and so i said well i think it was because i read um Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities and i just
I read Oliver Twist by Dickens.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Farrow is humorless and steeped in a bottomless melancholy.

Here is a hypothesis:
Farrow is depressed and acting very sad.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell