Q: Colleagues: Risk Analytics would like to ensure that the impact of Sept.11 events on Enron's retail positions-if any-are identified and communicated to the URM. There is very specific emphasis on the regulatory perspective (rather than a much wider economic impact) and I hope that the attached two-page presentation can help. The first page is our short positions in September classified by State, and the second page lists the seven regulatory issues that affect the curves materially as they constitute inputs to the forecasting mechanism. The ten states (NY, CA, IL, NJ, TX, SC, FL, NV, MA, and OH) represent over 70% of URM total positions of 103 TWh (short). It is very possible that the regulatory environment shall not change in a material manner and thus this request to address the impact is an over reaction. However, I would appreciate very much your inputs and opinions. Please let me know if you have any question. Brgrds
Propose a subject line
A: Utility Risk Management Postions - Impact of Sep. 11th Events

Q: I've got three undeveloped rolls of film in my car that I keep meaning to get developed but always forget until I'm not in the car. I'll get around to it one of these days. My address is: 1322 Rutland St. Houston, TX 77008 (713)863-7190
Propose a subject line
A: The Bitter End

Q: Ruth: In follow-up to our telephone conversation, I am confirming that it is my analysis of the purchase agreement between CES and ENA that ENA must refund to CES any transportation refunds it gets relating to the CES transportation contracts that relate to activity prior to January 1, 2000. Likewise, if there are costs relating to such contracts prior to January 1, 2000, those are the responsibility of CES. I hope this helps to clarify the situation. Jeff
Propose a subject line
A: Columbia Energy Services Corporation

Q: Attached is a list of Japanese counterparties. I need to respond to EnronOnline Friday with my approvals to this list. The list is broken up into 3 groups, Group 1 being counterparties already opened up for online trading (so you don't need to re-review), Group 2 being counterparties that we have correct names and credit on (you need to review this list which has about 100 counterparties), and Group 3 being counterparties that we have bad names or no approved credit yet ( so you don't need to approve this list). You may ask, what products will these counterparties trade? They can potentially trade all the products we offer online so you need to look at them like any new counterparty. Saying that, what we really expect them to trade is the Singapore based group of products.
Propose a subject line
A:
Japanese Approvals