Question: Sentence A: on he can't hear me i i don't remember how many people but it's it's got men men and women and it's not it's it's nice i mean it's pleasant you know music it's not what's it hurts your ears to hear it but it's not as it's not like uh Chicago where it's got that much instrument to it you know it doesn't have like all the brass and everything

Sentence B: The music is pleasant and does not hurt your ears.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: This encourages the least expensive reductions over time as well as across facilities.
Across all facilities, the least expensive reductions are encouraged by this.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Messinger has at least been alluding to the new reformist thinking, while Giuliani merely mocks good-government proposals as so much eyewash.

Here is a hypothesis:
Guiliani loves government proposals.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: huh-uh oh what kinds of things do they uh show

Sentence 2: Do they show anything?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Analyzing Written Material.

Does it follow that "They are analyzing the written materials in the pamphlets."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "The second bill was dismissed as veto bait, but Republicans were deemed to have scored a victory by detaching it and thereby removing Clinton's excuse to veto the larger bill.", can we conclude that "The second bill was not passed because it was considered veto bait."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes