In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: I don't think it bothers him in the least. The only thing worse than being a sore loser like you would be a sore winner. I'm sure Torque is quite happy to be in the position that he is. Clinton was a weak candidate, and the electoral college did exactly what it was created to do. If only you lefties hadn't sold out Bernie, he probably would have won. hahaha

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Except those priests who rape children. They weren't, and aren't, so much shepherds as wolves preying upon the flock, often with the support of the hierarchy. But, because they have been given magic powers by the bishop, and those magic powers cannot be removed, they remain priests of the Church even while committing vile acts condemned by all decent humans.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: What is truly screwed up is having someone like Barbara Hudman making such a stupid comment and who probably knows zilch on what it takes to contain a fire of this magnitude. Ms. Hudman say a prayer for those who perished and then shut your trap and help clean up the debris.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****