Premise:
"They know you and they know this place."
Hypothesis: The cops already know you and where you live.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: Anyway, as Clinton's lawyer David Kendall pointed out at the hearing, this rule is about official statements, not anonymous leaks. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Kendall is Clinton's lawyer."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "no i don't know they're they keep doing things and it doesn't seem to be doing any good i was i was really amazed because i never would have expected you know this problem somewhere like in Atlanta", can we conclude that "Nothing they do about these sinkholes seems to help and it's destroying Atlanta. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: The sequence of screening tests needs to be evaluated by studying the NIAAA approach and several alternatives.

Sentence B: The screening doesn't have enough analysis

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: New Yorker writer Remnick's sequel to his Pulitzer Prize-winning Lenin's Tomb is a compelling postscript (Walter Laqueur, Los Angeles Times ). Reviewers focus on Remnick's access to political insiders, especially his extended interviews with Mikhail Gorbachev, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, and Gennady Zyuganov.
Remnick's sequal was worse than the original
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
No one has ever overdosed.

Here is a hypothesis:
No one has ever overdosed.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes