In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Durango?!? I'm ambivalent about Amazon picking Denver but please don't destroy the smaller towns in the state. Durango would become unrecognizable if they were sucked into the Amazon orbit.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[Q]: Comment: This firm is a train wreck, selling very very expensive funds that have not done very well.

And everyone leaving?? Obviously there is a lot of 'screwing the client' going on.
[A]: Sexual-explicit

[Q]: Comment: Blame Warren Buffett. RTD did not sign the deal for use of BNSF for a few years after 2006 the voters approved the use of BNSF tracks(public record). Buffet bought final 77% of BNSF (that he did not own) for $44M in november 2009 and when RTD came back to sign the deal Buffet wanted 4x more $ for occasional use of HIS tracks ( he wants about $1B to share the tracks. That's why HE is super wealthy and a kinda huge dick.
[A]:
Sexual-explicit