IN: John, This is a follow-up to our earlier discussion. I would like to have you lay out our physical crude needs to become a player a long with some action steps to accomplish the goal. I don't want to forget about this because I believe it may be something we need to assign someone or a mid-market or originator or team to accomplish. I would like to see foreign and domestic. I see this as one of our possible competitive advantages or at least to solve the problem of not being in the know and getting second hand info or pricing. Thanks,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Crude - Physical
IN: This is an email
Tracy: I did a preliminary Weekly for Steve since he will be on vacation the rest of this week. I will do another one tomorrow. Just wanted to give him a look at where we are since we did not do a Weekly last week. Please review and if it is OK I will give it to Steve. Thanks!

What is the subject?

OUT: TW Weekly for November 30, 2001
QUESTION: Hi Melba, We need to have a couple of new physical products set up as soon as you can. They are: 1) Nicor/E. Dubuque = The interconnection between Nicor Gas Company and Northern Natural Gas Company located in Jo Daviess County, Illinois 2) PGLC/NGPL (Non-Pool) = The interconnection between The Peoples Gas Light & Coke Company and Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America (Pin No. 909285) 3) NBPL/Peoples/MANHTN = The interconnection between The Peoples Gas Light & Coke Company and Northern Border Pipeline Company located in Cook County, Illinois (Meter No. 81) Please let me know when these products can be activated. Thanks
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: New Products
Concerning the status of Cinnabar, Mr. Shumway and I are currently discussing requested changes in the Guaranty involving letters of credit and damages. We cannot agree to their suggested change in language to the Guaranty. Therefore as some of their transactions are for 30-60 days and they are looking at on line trading, I purposed for the short term a GISB. He agreed, and I will be sending our draft of same to him for review (I will include you in my e-mail). The issue of the Master is still open and I await his final response. I will keep you informed of Cinnabar's status.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Cinnabar Energy Services & Trading, L.L.C.
I am working with the Click Paper.com lawyers on their online documentation, and they want to see a UK form of financial GTC. Can you send me one? As ever, in your debt...
Answer: Need Help!
Q: Ken, As you'll recall, during the September 10th advisory board meeting, we discussed the need for strong, senior-level support to ensure an opportunity for Xcelerator's success. At the conclusion of the meeting, we agreed you and Greg Whalley would discuss the support level with the Management Committee on the 13th. Of course, the sad events of the 11th understandably delayed that timeline. Since September 10th, I've revisited the Xcelerator with several members of the Management Committee including Louise Kitchen, John Lovorato, Jim Fallon, John Sheriff, and Andy Fastow. In summary, they are supportive contingent on support from you and Greg. Additionally, other Xcelerator board members are supportive - specifically Jeff Donahue and Kevin Garland - but all agree the sincere support from you and Greg will be necessary for success. Greg Whalley and I have also discussed the Xcelerator on two occasions. Greg is concerned that I will be unable to attract good talent from within Enron to this "risky" initiative, especially given the trajectory of the economy and scarcity of new jobs within the company. I agree with him. Greg asked if I would try the Xcelerator understanding that most if not all of the full-time team members would need to be hired from the outside. Although not optimal, I think it is doable and told him I'd be willing to proceed under those circumstances. While Greg was quite supportive, he was appropriately distracted by the upcoming board meeting and close of the quarter. As a result, he and I are planning on discussing the future of the Xcelerator this Tuesday. (Of course, the earnings announcement may delay that discussion to next week.) As I mentioned in the Xcelerator's board meeting, I am excited about this opportunity and am committed to giving it my all, with the support of the senior team. This effort could create tremendous value for Enron. However, I have no delusions about how difficult it will be and the patience it will require. If we are successful over '02, we will definitely create value for our shareholders, but are almost certain to be a drag on earnings -- albeit a small one. If you and Greg are not able to be supportive, then let's acknowledge that and discontinue the Xcelerator's operations. As we discussed on the 10th, lukewarm senior support will not be sufficient for success.
Propose a subject line
A:
Quick update: status of the Xcelerator