In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.

Example Input: Context: High arginase-1 (Arg) expression by myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) is known to inhibit antitumor T-cell responses through depletion of l-arginine. We have previously shown that nitric oxide (NO), an immune mediator produced from l-arginine, is a potent radiosensitizer of hypoxic tumor cells. This study therefore examines whether Arg(+) overexpressing MDSC may confer radioresistance through depleting the substrate for NO synthesis.', 'MDSC and Arg expression were studied in preclinical mouse CT26 and 4T1 tumor models and further validated in rectal cancer patients in comparison with healthy donors. The radioprotective effect of MDSC was analyzed in hypoxic tumor cells with regard to l-arginine depletion.', 'In both mouse tumors and cancer patients, MDSC expansion was associated with Arg activation causing accelerated l-arginine consumption. l-Arginine depletion in turn profoundly suppressed the capacity of classically activated macrophages to synthesize NO resulting in impaired tumor cell radiosensitivity. In advanced cT3-4 rectal cancer, circulating neutrophils revealed Arg overexpression approaching that in MDSC, therefore mounting a protumor compartment wherein Arg(+) neutrophils increased from 17% to over 90%.\Question: Do myeloid-derived suppressor cells reveal radioprotective properties through arginase-induced l-arginine depletion?
Example Output: Protumor Arg(+) MDSC reveal a unique ability to radioprotect tumor cells through l-arginine depletion, a common mechanism behind both T-cell and macrophage inhibition.

Example Input: Context: We have previously demonstrated that hypertonic saline (HS) resuscitation decreased inflammation and mucosal injury after mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion (I/R). In contrast to I/R cell necrosis, apoptosis provides controlled cell death that minimizes inflammation. We therefore hypothesized that HS resuscitation after mesenteric I/R would induce apoptosis and decrease mucosal injury.', "Rats underwent 60 minutes of superior mesenteric artery occlusion (SMAO) and then received no resuscitation or resuscitation with 4 mL/kg of HS, 4 mL/kg of lactated Ringer's (LR) solution (equal volume), or 32 mL/kg of LR solution (equal salt load). Rats were killed at 6 hours of reperfusion, and ileum was harvested for analysis. DNA fragmentation (apoptosis) was assessed by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end-labeling (TUNEL) and mucosal injury by histology (Chiu score 0-5). Caspase-3 (proapoptotic mediator) and Bcl-xL (antiapoptotic mediator) protein expression were analyzed by Western immunoblot.", 'SMAO with no resuscitation, SMAO with 4 mL/kg of LR, and SMAO with 32 mL/kg of LR increased apoptosis (quantitated by TUNEL) and I/R-induced mucosal injury (quantitated by Chiu score). This was associated with an increase to similar levels in both proapoptotic caspase-3 and antiapoptotic Bcl-xL protein expression. Moreover, SMAO with 4 mL/kg of HS further increased apoptosis but decreased mucosal injury. This was associated with a differential expression of proapoptotic caspase-3 over antiapoptotic Bcl-xL.\Question: Does hypertonic saline resuscitation after mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion induce ileal apoptosis?
Example Output: HS resuscitation after mesenteric I/R significantly increased ileal mucosal apoptosis while decreasing mucosal injury and may represent a novel mechanism by which HS resuscitation after mesenteric I/R reduces inflammation and imparts protection to the gut.

Example Input: Context: A cross-sectional study of spinal loading in healthy volunteers.', 'To measure the bending and compressive forces acting on the lumbar spine, in a range of postures, when unknown loads are delivered unexpectedly to the hands.', 'Epidemiologic studies suggest that sudden and unexpected loading events often lead to back injuries. Such incidents have been shown to increase back muscle activity, but their effects on the compressive force and bending moment acting on the spine have not been fully quantified. Furthermore, previous investigations have focused on the upright posture only.', 'In this study, 12 volunteers each stood on a force plate while weights of 0, 2, 4, and 6 kg (for men, 40% less for women) were delivered into their hands in one of three ways: 1) by the volunteer holding an empty box with handles, into which an unknown weight was dropped; 2) by the same way as in 1, but with volunteer wearing a blindfold and earphones to eliminate sensory cues; or 3) by the volunteer sliding a box of unknown weight off a smooth table. Experiments were carried out with participants standing in upright, partially flexed, and moderately flexed postures. Spinal compression resulting from muscular activity was quantified using electromyographic signals recorded from the back and abdominal muscles. The axial inertial force acting up the long axis of the spine was calculated from the vertical ground reaction force. The bending moment acting on the osteoligamentous spine was quantified by comparing measurements of lumbar curvature with the bending stiffness properties of cadaveric lumbar spines.', 'The contribution from abdominal muscle contraction to overall spinal compression was small (average, 8%), as was the axial inertial force (average, 2.5%), and both were highest in the upright posture. Peak bending moments were higher in flexed postures, but did not increase much at the moment of load delivery in any posture. Peak spinal compressive forces were increased by 30% to 70% when loads were suddenly and unexpectedly dropped into the box, and by 20% to 30% when they were slid off the table, as compared with loads simply held statically in the same posture (P < 0.001). The removal of audiovisual cues had little effect.\Question: Does sudden and unexpected loading generate high forces on the lumbar spine?
Example Output:
Sudden and alarming events associated with manual handling cause a reflex overreaction of the back muscles, which substantially increases spine compressive loading. Manual handling regulations should aim to prevent such events and limit the weight of objects to be lifted.