Premise:
"He'd go on into town, and he'd--he'd do whatever he pleased."
Hypothesis: He would never in his life go into town.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: yeah and you know i didn't think that one was near as good If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Nah, and I must tell you, that that one was much better."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "Willingness to pay and Willingness to accept are comparable measures when the change in environmental quality is small and there are reasonably close substitutes available.", can we conclude that "Willingness to pay and willingness to accept are comparable."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: 5. What are the Implications of Current Fiscal Policy Choices for Future Living Standards?

Sentence B: Future Living Standards are impacted by Current Fiscal Policy.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Of course.
Absolutely.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Does this constitute an independent argument for taxing pollution, quite aside from its environmental payoff?

Here is a hypothesis:
If we don't tax the public, will the environment get worse

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no