Sentence 1: Steel, like the market, lost 80 percent of its 1929 value.

Sentence 2: The steel market crashed.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Let fools like Severn pretend that life continued normally.

Does it follow that "Severn and the others were not in touch with the reality of life. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If However, the nature of these Federal physical assets that are classified as stewardship PP and E differ from general PP and E in that their values may be indeterminable or may have little meaning (for example, museum collections, monuments, assets acquired in the formation of the nation) or that allocating the cost of such assets (for example, military weapons systems and space exploration hardware) to accounting periods that benefit from the ownership of such assets is meaningless., can we say that "These assets should be allocated to accounting periods."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"We're all familiar with the Miranda warning, or at least how it sounds in the movies."
Hypothesis: No one has ever heard of the Miranda warning before.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: Just because an organization drops off the cover of Vanity Fair or People or the Saturday Evening Post doesn't mean it has ceased to exist. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Organizations don't cease to exist simply because Vanity Fair stops talking about them."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Q: If The word cannibal derives from Carib, a reminder of the way these marauders disposed of some prisoners., can we say that "Cannibals do not like eating humans."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
no