Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

New York<br>I went to New York City to sing last year. I went to Central Park to get some nice pictures. On they way back, I saw a street market. I was so engrossed in the market, I got lost. I had to walk many extra blocks to get back to my hotel!

Sentence: The hotel was close to Central Park.

Output: It's impossible to say
Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

All right. Now, previously, on September 12th, the Court entered an order which went to the motion for reconsideration. That related specifically to -- filed by the reporters. That went specifically to our August 2nd order which, in effect, said that the reporters would have to testify at certain depositions.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: The reporters do not have to testify for some depositions.
****
Answer:
No
[Q]: When he approached Mr. Landry, did the Prime Minister tell him that this intervention in the field of education was raising hackles in Quebec and that everyone involved-students, the academic community and federalists and sovereignists alike-strongly opposed the federal government's intrusion into an area of provincial jurisdiction? intervention is the topic of discussion OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]: Yes
Problem: Well, I'm not for photo licensing. Let me say something about Columbine. Listen, we've got gun laws. He says we ought to have gun-free schools. Everybody believes that. I'm sure every state in the union has got them. You can't carry a gun into a school. And there ought to be a consequence when you do carry a gun into a school.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "There should be no consequence when you bring a gun to school."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: No
Q: The speaker implies he has stood up for the rights of people who disagree with him in the past.
But I think marriage is a sacred institution. I'm going to be respectful for people who may disagree with me. I've had a record of doing so in the State of Texas. I've been a person that had been called a uniter, not a divider, because I accept other people's points of view.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: Yes
Q: The Ministers have a great benefits package.
''this section, the Ministers and the minister responsible for the other Act referred to in paragraph (6)( a ) are responsible for determining whether or not the requirements referred to in that paragraph are met by that other Act or regulations made under that Act, and ( a ) if the Ministers and that other minister determine that the''
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A:
It's impossible to say