In this task, you are given product reviews about dvds. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive(the reviewer is satisfied) or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative(the reviewer is not satisfied).
Q: Ken Park how not to make a movie . Larry Clark reminds me of a lot Let's take a look at his pathetic resume shall we: *Kids-Yes another soft porn film involving Kids. *Bully- This movie should be when "White Trash attacks". Bully featured mundane acting, the most UNLIKABLE characters ever to put on screen, stupid characters, a "twist" that aint really a twist, awful camera shots and angle and a "gay bull". Nuff said. *Teenage Caveman-Subpar sci-film. Now we get to Ken Park, probably the most revolting story of Clark's kids trilogy if you will. These kids special? Please give me a break. I don't call killing your neighbors or grandparents, special. Doing drugs makes you special? Funny I thought that made you a druggie and a loser. There is no smoothness or observation or anaylsis of the kids from any sort of rhetorical view. Anyone who who seeks to compare this to classic shows like Family Ties, or My So Called Life isn't fooling anyone. One key difference, the kids in so called life, knew they were troubled, lost and asked for help. The teens in "Ken Park" could give a crap if they live or die, their days are spent on drug binges, fornicating with the friends and in some cases, their friend's mother. Really it doesn't get anymore revoling that Larry Clark. None of the characters in the movie can be considered, weak, inept, pathetic, loony comes to mind but far from being strong. Softcore and hardcore pornograpy seem to be what the filmmaking is echoing nothing else, the other reviews even the most positive ones can ignore that. There is no reality with these kids, they live in their violent world and heaven forbid if you try to take them out of it. Clark is not anybody's master of art, if you're art is hardcore pornography, mixed in with convulted storyline , with no rolemodels, no point and weak characters then people need to pick up a dictionary or read actual definitions of art. The movie is nothing more than tour de force of obscene garbage that should be flushed down the toilet. Seeing at the reception Clark has received over the year, it's great that fans are starting to see what he really is just a perverted old man , nothing else. Even then his movies make him look even more pathetic.
A:
NEG