input question: The Times ' prescription is comparable to allowing people to choose how much to sleep while forbidding them from choosing how much to stay awake If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The Times' prescribed something that is being critiqued."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "The rule provides for recompense to the mortgagees for using these alternative procedures and provides for payment to the mortgagee of a partial claim which would be applied to the arrearage.", can we conclude that "The rule changes how mortgages are paid."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: So much for the cruel stereotype of the pea-brained dinosaur.

Sentence B: Science says dinosaurs were the stupidest animals.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: You can't never tell how a kid's gonna turn out.
Everyone knows genetics dictate whether a kid is a good one or not.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
The rule was issued as a notice of proposed rulemaking on April 18, 1996 (61 Fed.

Here is a hypothesis:
All proposed rules are subject to wild and drastic change without report.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
uh-huh yeah that's about that's about all i listen to is the classical stuff we have a we have a really good classical radio station here

Does it follow that "We have a good classical station here and that is mostly what I listen to on my commute."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell