Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example is below.
Q: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
A: Yes
Rationale: The comment suggests threat against Trump and his agendas and classified as threatening. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: Actually, Obama redefined turn backs at the border as deportations, thus vastly inflating his deportation numbers, so no one really knows what the correct comparison is. But essentially, no president has taken on this problem. Trump will be the first if he gets elected, and he will only need to use existing law to do it. But funding it will be the trick. If he finds a way to do that, and he might, he will have solved a problem no other president has been able to. But he has to get elected first, not an easy thing when running against a person powerful enough to keep from being indicted for obvious felonies that even the Director of the CIA, a former celebrated general, could not avoid for much lesser violations.
A:
No