In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: He's at least admitting that the best thing he can do is lick his own balls. Hasn't done much else except prove he' a liar.Good thing about it he's more like a poodle, they can lick their own balls plus other dogs too.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: That is 100 % an impossibility. If you are pro life and vote and support candidates and a party that advocates full term and late term abortion at will then you cannot under any circumstance be pro life.

You have to look at where the candidates stand. Hillary wants us to be required to provide and pay for abortions and abortive medicines. She stated flat out in the debate she supports full term partial birth murder. HOW can ANY Catholic support her. Then there are the e - mails where she, through her campaign, states how "backwards" we are and advocates groups to sping to action when they can incite a "Catholic Spring." SHE will use law and the courts to mandate the marrying of homosexuals and the providing of abortion procedures. No Catholic can vote for her.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: WE ARE CALLING ON CANADA TO BAN ALL AMERICAN BAPTISTS FROM ENTERING THE COUNTRY,,THE AMERICAN BAPTISTS ARE RAPING CANADIAN CHILDREN..ALSO BAN ALL MUSLIMS AS THEY ARE DOING THE SAME CRIMES

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit