You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: So that was Scheer who swore at an MP, elbowed another in the chest, and grabbed one by the wrist and yanked him down the centre aisle in the house. Was he also the one who called MP Peter Kent a piece of sh$t? And is he the leader who petulantly refuses to directly answer most questions and then sits down with an arrogant smirk?

Wow. If he's that guy, he deserves everything he gets from the other side.

I'm a little surprised though. I was told that Andrew Scheer served for four years as the speaker of the house which is a bit like herding cats and yet was quite popular on all sides of the chambre and able to discharge his duties with relative diplomacy and an even temper.

It was one of the other leaders, so I was told, who was an arrogant, smirking bully much like his father and used to always getting his way and having everyone fawn all over him.

Thanks for setting me straight, Ursula.
Output:
Non-threat