In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: You can't fix stupid, and Alaska has proven itself to be really, really stupid.
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: Here in Philadelphia there were about 50,000. It was very civil in my opinion. People brought their children. One child had a sign: "I am too young to vote but I will remember." A woman had a sign: "I protested in the 60s and today I am protesting in my 60s." There were very few signs relating to abortion and hardly any signs that were vulgar unless the sign on someone's male boxer dog would offend some: "Build a wall and I'll pi** on it." There were signs on immigration, education, climate, human rights, health care - all issues that are important to women. I had a sign with a picture of Pope Francis saying: "Build bridges not walls." A man with a group from his synagogue smiled and nodded to me when he read my sign.
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: Such stupidity....most analysis done by financial experts is largely conspiracy theory based. Oil pricing is perfect example. Weekly oil inventory changes of 0.3 mmbpd in a 100 mmbpd marketplace are considered to be 100% relevant. One would think the financial/economic whiz kids would be happy that one or two mmbpd of oil supply could be brought on as a safety valve for political/facility disruptions given that it takes ten to fifteen years to bring online any significant amount of incremental production. At some point their foolishness will have major negative consequences.
[EX A]:
Insult