Hey Tricey! I haven't talked to you or seen you in a little while. What has been going on? How are the boys? Not too much is going on with me. I went on a field trip with Taylor yesterday to the Oil Ranch (pumpkin patch) and we had a good time. Danielle was going to give you your invitation to her shower on Tuesday but she didn't know that we weren't having rehearsal and I didn't either. Needless to say, I have your invitation and I would like to give it to you. Do you think that you are coming? It's at the Pappadeaux on Westheimer at 4PM. By the way, do you by chance have Sherie's phone number or email address I have one for her too?
Answer: Hi
Here is an email: I recall that we set up a warning flag approach with market services last year to make sure that Sempra never "goes physical" without us manning the battle stations and deciding what to do. Do you guys know who the noms would come in to in Market Services if Sempra ever decided to try to take their gas out of Cunningham and move it off system? Care to venture a guess as to what that person would do if a 100,000 nom by Sempra into an IT contract for a haul from the Cunningham storage point to Demarc hit their desk? Sempra couldn't nom the gas into a transport contract without first giving Kent/Sue/Morgan a physical delivery nom under the SF agreement, correct? At which point we would immediately nom the SBA, correct? These issues may be important to our closing this year's deal if TCEM can't come up with the corp. guarantee. I.e., if we can retain absolute control of the noms, do we really have any "go physical" risk??? We need to think this through. DF
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: last year's deal
Q: Christy, I read these points and they definitely need some touch up. I don't understand why we need to give our commentary on why prices are so high in California. This subject has already gotten so much press. Phillip
Propose a subject line
A: Talking points about California Gas market
IN: PG&E National Energy Group and any other company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the regulated California utility. Neither PG&E National Energy Group nor these other referenced companies are regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission. Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company do not have to buy products from these companies in order to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: PG&E GTN Customer Survey
IN: This is an email
Attached are the referenced lists. If the Credit Counterparty is "amended" I don't have any changes to what I've previously said about the counterparty unless I add "w/change" (which I didn't have any on these lists, so just keep the Legal approvals the same). The only counterparty on the 12/22/99 list was a "read only" counterparty, so I didn't bother responding to that list. For physical power, again, even 'tho I'm not saying it, "no" for European based physical power products.

What is the subject?

OUT: Counterparty Lists for 12/21/99 and 12/27/99
Please see the attached and let me know if you have questions. If it looks OK to you and the 1/2 reimbursement arrangement is OK with EPFS, please forward to James Centilli for his review. Thanks.
Answer:
draft I&O