Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

CONTEXT: To get rid of Jesse. It's my speculation, I think Gus is not able to kill Jesse directly because of Walt. But he can create a situation where he can get killed on his own. So killing Tomas is a good way to make Jesse create trouble for his own self. It was Walt's involvement which saved Jesse in the end otherwise Jesse might died that day. <sep> Q: Why did Tomas have to die? A: To get rid of Jesse Q: Was his method successful? A: I think Gus is not able to kill Jesse directly because of Walt Q: What is the conclusion of the episode? A: It was Walt's involvement which saved Jesse in the end otherwise Jesse might died that day Q: Who's plan was it to kill Tomas? A: So killing Tomas is a good way to make Jesse create trouble for his own self <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Are there any plot twists?
Yes