IN: This is an email
Any member who would like to have his or her photo taken may come by the Houston Bar Association office between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on June 19 or June 20. There is no charge for the photo, no appointment is necessary, and the photo sessions will take only a few minutes. The Houston Bar Association office is located downtown at 1001 Fannin, Suite 1300. The HBA hopes to have as many current photos as possible in the new Roster, so please take advantage of this opportunity.

What is the subject?

OUT: Reminder: June 19 and 20 - HBA Pictorial Roster Photos - Free
QUESTION: Here's the current forecast for Lenny. Shouldn't be a major problem for us but I feel for folks scheduled to go down there tomorrow and Thursday. Bruce - we're still keeping our fingers crossed that your permit will come through. Are you sure you've got the right lawyer working on this? Seems like he ought to be able to shake it loose somehow. Anything at all we can do from here?
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Lenny
John/Gia: You asked that we attempt to evaluate our activities. Working with TW, I've valued this one. The California Commission ruled that the "Hector Road" natural gas recent point in California ought to be made a primary receipt point. This would have had the effect of TW losing access right to 200 MMcf/d of capacity at SoCalGas' Needles receipt point. Best case scenario: Under SFV rates, loss to TW is commodity rates (wash) and the fuel margin. TW calculates the fuel margin to be $5.8MM/yr. Bad case: If shippers on TW try to make the case that TW is at fault for losing the primary access rights, then TW is at risk for the demand component of the contracts associated with the 200 MMcf/d. TW calculates the demand charges loss to be $16.5 MM/yr. Worse case: In addition to actual damages listed above, shippers face performance penalties and other contractual damages (from their customers) and they try to pass those costs on to TW. I discussions with TW, we concluded that the most likely case fell between "best" and "bad," somewhere in the $12-15MM/yr range. TW believes that without the assistance of CA Gov't Affairs in the case, the $12-15 MM/yr would have been lost. Be happy to discuss with you further. Best,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Valuation of GA Activities
How would you like meeting to discuss pooling our resources? One of my responsibilities for East Power Trading/CRM, is generating load and HR curves for Nepool, NY, and PJM. It's my understanding you have access and use some of the same data for your analyses. My schedule is flexible. At your convenience, please let me know your availability . Thanks,
Answer: data sources
Here is an email: Well, you never know... Got back into the office today after taking two days off with Sheila and family in Fredricksburg to find a thick envelope from Mertz Ranch Company buried in my "in box". Did not know what to expect, had visions of Mertz mailing it back with a note saying forget it. Instead, the lease was signed and dated and had a nice note saying "thanks". Go figure. We've got a lease for four more years. Same deal, same contract as the last three years, just 6K more a year. Price remains the same this year. next year it is 2k a year per spot and we will need to add one spot. Still waiting on Chet. Would like to know who McCombs would suggest if Chet does not commit. Lease requires Mertz to spent 2k a year on protien feed. He and I can agree in writing to reduce or increase that amount with a corresponding reduction or increase in lease cost. Term is April 1, 2002 to April 1 2005; exclusive right to hunt turkey and deer, spring turkey starting the third weekend in april. I'm pleased. Hope you are, too. Erik.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Good News, Lease Signed
QUESTION: Dear Market Participant, Technical Bulletin # 79 - Generator Committments Due to 24-hour NOx Averaging Requirements - is being distributed for Market Participant comment. The Technical Bulletin will be posted to the NYISO web site following the comment period. The purpose of our Technical Bulletins is to facilitate participation in the NYISO by communicating various NYISO concepts, techniques, and processes to Market Participants before they can be formally documented in a NYISO manual. Please forward comments on this Technical Bulletin, via email, by 5PM on Tuesday, October 2, 2001 to: Peter Lemme NYISO Customer Technical Services plemme@nyiso.com (See attached file: TB_79_draft.pdf) - TB_79_draft.pdf
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
NYISO - Technical Bulletin # 79 - Generator Committments Due to 24-hour NOx Averaging Requirements