In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: Blacks, coloreds and Indians where not the target of the hatred that BPs policies where aimed at. Whilst the people where used by BP it was towards Whites that BP targeted the hatred. WMC, not BMC or CMC.
[A]: Identity-attack

[Q]: Comment: No, we don't have to "agree to disagree." It's just something trite people like to say. (Note you didn't even agree but went on arguing your opinion with, of all things, an appeal to your ignorance.)

As for the appeal to cite "any person nationally," you haven't even cited anyone so bugger off already. (Note, nor would it matter as it's all just silly opinion anyway.)

I repeat, shake things up a bit and hire Kaepernick as the quarterback.
[A]: Non-identity-attack

[Q]: Comment: I did over 23 years in the military and am 40% disabled, some of that combat related disability. I cannot live on a military retirement alone so yes, I am working for the government again.

A person would be stupid to not take advantage of any and every opportunity that comes by them. So if you don't like the fact that I am still working for the government then too bad. You do 23+ years for your country and you too can get the extra 10 points I got to get that job.
[A]:
Non-identity-attack