instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: This topic must be expanded beyond "clergy sex abuse" to abuse of all kinds by clergy. There are priests who engage in patterns of verbal and emotional abuse which are just as damaging to the victims, and if the victims report the treatment, they are ridiculed, intimidated and manipulated to keep silent by those in authority over these abusers, who go merrily on their way, thinking, "As long as I'm not caught in bed with a woman, or a man, or looking at porn on a computer, nothing will happen." They behave like spoiled children, and those in authority enable and protect them.
answer:
Sexual-explicit

question:
Comment: Ya know, I gotta say, I don't find it much comfort to hear that "well, other denominations are losing adherents too." (As bad as the "well, other people abuse children too" with the implication that the hierarchy is somehow excused from the abuse and cover-up.) The overall drift away from Catholicism and other Christian denominations suggests a bigger overall problem. Christianity began and grew in the midst of a decadent secular Roman society, so frankly, it's not society's fault. I can't help thinking too many supposed Christian leaders have become too wrapped up in trying to dominate society with secular power rather than leading by spiritual example.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit

question:
Comment: War shouldn't be the first answer but with Republicans it usually is. I wonder how many in the National Guard thought they'd be going to Iraq and Afghanistan? Not many I would think since they hadn't been used that way before. Thanks, GW. No, Davis, I'm not saying our soldiers are stupid. I'm saying our leaders are.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit