Q: Premise: "Two football players are tackling a third while a referee watches."
Hypothesis: "The football players are playing football."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: yes
Chain-of-thought: The football players are playing football because two football players are tackling a third.

Q: Premise: "An older girl helps a younger girl ice skate."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Two girls ice skate." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: yes
Chain-of-thought: An older girl and a younger girl indicates two girls ice skate.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A young boy is sitting in a blue chair."
Hypothesis: "The boy is tired."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: Just the boy is sitting in a chair doesn't mean he is tired.

Q: Given the sentence "Three dogs on a beach looking at a red ball in someones hand." can we conclude that "Three dogs are playing at the beach."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought:
Not all dogs on a beach looking at a red ball in someones hand are playing at the beach.