This is the content of an email: Jeff: Sorry this took so long but here are my thoughts on the above: 1. In Section 3.1 (c), I'm assuming that the additional sections were added because we will get these reps in another agreement from the Trust. Is that correct? 2. In Section 3.4 e), the new language regarding rescission of acceleration I think belongs after the phrase that begins, "if the effect of such failure..." Also, where did the new language regarding prepayments at the end come from? Is this in the Revolver or in Enron's existing deals? 3. Section 3.11 should be made subject to Section 5.7 or vice versa. Carol
What was the subject line for this email?
Swap Assignment Agreement - April 20 Draft