Premise:
"The fights are riotous slapstick set In the art museum finale, Chan fends off hordes of assassins while catching giant, priceless Ming vases as they tumble from their pedestals."
Hypothesis: All of Chan's fights include him fighting assassins and protecting pieces of art.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: Think now, did I ever say to you that I believed John Cavendish guilty? If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Think now, did I not show you proof that John Cavendish was guilty?"?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "It can be so exhilarating that one needs ever greater amounts of it and can be induced to do silly or reckless things to get more of it.", can we conclude that "It can be so exciting that you never need more."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: I wanted to help her.

Sentence B: I hoped I was able to help her.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Brinkley skirts the arguments against his rosy vision.
Brinkley embraces his detractors.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Whatever your beliefs about the formal obstruction of justice case against Clinton, Lewinsky clearly intuited that her mendacity would please the president.

Here is a hypothesis:
Lewinsky knew how to appeal to Clinton's ego.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell