TASK DEFINITION: Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.
PROBLEM: CONTEXT: I'm afraid you completely misunderstood a lot of the movie. At the start of the movie, Hal is already dead (killed himself in prison). Those scenes with Hal (mostly in New York) were all flashbacks. The present is with sister in San Francisco. Jasmine meets Dwight at a party in San Francisco. This is long after Hal killed himself. But to your question: "Why did Jasmine arrest Hal?" It was purely a spur of the moment, revenge thing. Hal had just told Jasmine that he was in love with this French girl and was going to leave her. And almost immediately, Jasmine calls the FBI (or rather calls someone to get the FBI's number). <sep> Q: Why did Jasmine arrest Hal? A: Hal had just told Jasmine that he was in love with this French girl and was going to leave her Q: Who did Jasmine sleep with? A: Dwight Q: Who did Jasmine call about Hal? A: Jasmine calls the FBI <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who did she accuse Hal of sleeping with?

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: CONTEXT: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover". The whole movie is against stereotypes. The bunny should be a carrot farmer, because that's what bunnies do, the predators are bullies an deep down everyone feels that way, because when assumption is made that only predators are going feral, everyone accepts it as truth. You can see that even the fox is bullied for being a predator because he is perceived as one. <sep> Q: What is the moral of Zootopia? A: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover Q: Is the story about taking risks? A: The whole movie is against stereotypes Q: What is the relevance of the bunny in the film. A: The bunny should be a carrot farmer, because that's what bunnies do, the predators are bullies an deep down everyone feels that way Q: What is the relevance of the predators? A: You can see that even the fox is bullied for being a predator because he is perceived as one Q: isn't the moral about trying everything in life? A: I believe the moral of the story is "Don't judge book by its cover <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else that's relevant from the film?

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: CONTEXT: Solozzo indeed puts in place many countermeasures. First and most important, he was with Police Captain Mark McCluskey, who was on his payroll. Those days no one dared to do anything to a policeman, especially a Captain. It means bringing wrath of force and media on the whole family. Second, Micheal was checked for arms/guns or weapons while in the car sent by Solozzo. So, he was not supposed to have gun. The only man with a gun was the Captain, who was on Solozzo's side. Thirdly, Micheal was not even supposed to know where they were meeting until the end. Solozzo was confident that he could not plant a weapon or a man at the meeting place. The Corleone family got this information by paying some man from the Solozzo gang. Fourth, Micheal did not seem that harmful, as he recently joined family that to be until Don was in hospital. In fact, he was not involved in family business that time. All the above conclude that the only man who was at risk was Micheal. The countermeasures taken by Micheal for having a place with people, it works both ways. Micheal was also not supposed to be able to kill in front of people. <sep> Q: Why did Sollozzo risk it? A: the only man who was at risk was Micheal <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So why didn't Sollozzo put any counter measures for such a "Just in-case" scenario?

SOLUTION:
Yes