Premise:
"In 1992, Rieff went to Europe to explore the transformation of its cultural geography by Third World immigration."
Hypothesis: Nobody immigrated to Europe in 1992.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: Greece was given large concessions, Armenia was to become an independent state in the east, and the Middle East was to be divided among the Arab leaders who had fought with Colonel Lawrence (under British and French spheres of influence ). If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Greece, Armenia and the Middle East were subject to different ruling conditions."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "It means that she has discovered Monsieur Lawrence does not dislike her as much as she thought, replied Poirot philosophically. ", can we conclude that "Monsieur Lawrence doesn't actually dislike her at all and is in fact, quite fond of her. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: I can't stand here on this ladder all day long.

Sentence B: I don't have the ability to stay on the ladder for the entire day.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: -Rural routes have only 4.3 pieces per possible delivery, while city residential routes have
Residential routes have more pieces of mail per delivery.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
_Who_ were dead.

Here is a hypothesis:
A silence rose for those who were dead.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell