QUESTION: Given the sentence "A skier in the mountains." can we conclude that "A skier in the mountains."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A skier in the mountains is the same phrase as a skier in the mountains.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A skater in a black tee demonstrates a trick."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A person performs skating tricks for the crowd." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The skater does not have to be showing tricks for a crowd.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A group of people are completing a move with their heads slightly lowered and their arms bent and up."
Hypothesis: "There is a group of people lifting their arms up."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Lifting their arms up is a rephrase of their arms bent and up.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "A puppy jumps off a low brick wall." that "A puppy jumps off a wall and lands on a trampoline."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: A trampoline is not necessarily at the bottom of a brick wall.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A light turns red on hollywood boulevard."
Hypothesis: "The traffic light is the first one installed in american."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Not all traffic lights are the first one installed in American.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "A white man and an african american appear to be sitting in front of a scenery with plants and a tree." can we conclude that "A group of asian americans are out at an amusement park."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A:
In sentence 1 it was a white man and an African american and in sentence 2 it is a group of Asian Americans. Both statements cannot be true simultaneously.
The answer is no.