Problem: Here is a premise:
Underplayed : A California scientist announced that he has made chickens behave like quails by replacing their embryonic brain cells with quail brain cells.

Here is a hypothesis:
A California scientist said he made chickens act like quails by hypnotizing them.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: It would be something like the orreries he'd seen used for demonstrations of planetary movement.

Sentence 2: He had never seen such a device in his life.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
notion of divine sanction for democratic values.

Does it follow that "The idea of sacrosanct democratic values."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If He guesses " Mrs. Vandemeyer eyed him scornfully., can we say that "She was irritated with him. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"She started shovelling electronic equipment into the bath."
Hypothesis: She started throwing electronics into the bathtub.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: who was it well maybe maybe it wasn't that one then because it's a living it was a living person that i'm that i'm thinking of that um that said you know hey

Sentence 2: It wasn't one of the Beatles, but it's a living person.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell