In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Example input: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Example output: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Example explanation: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.
Q: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Sound Science in Risk Assessment
Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds that--
(1) as of the date of enactment of this Act, approximately
$140,000,000,000 per year, over 2 percent of the annual gross
national product of the United States, is being spent on
environmental compliance, and the amount being spent is
expected to rise substantially;
(2) unfunded Federal environmental mandates are straining
the budgets of State and local governments and may diminish the
financial resources available for other important public
programs and services;
(3) an environmental risk assessment developed by the
Environmental Protection Agency is often perceived as not
containing sufficient scientific objectivity, absence of bias,
clarity, or consistency to serve as a sound and credible basis
for protecting public health and safety, determining
environmental protection needs and priorities, making
regulatory decisions, or allocating limited financial
resources; and
(4) Executive Order No. 12866 (5 U.S.C. 601 note; relating
to regulatory planning and review) requires a decision by a
Federal agency to be based on the best reasonably obtainable
scientific and technical information, and embodies the
principle of openness in government.

SEC. 3. RISK ASSESSMENT PRINCIPLES.

In accordance with this Act, the Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency (referred to in this Act as the ''Administrator'')
shall develop rules, proposed rules, and review procedures that provide
that--
(1) risk assessments shall be--
(A) consistent;
(B) of high technical quality;
(C) scientifically objective; and
(D) unbiased; and
(2) significant uncertainties regarding facts, scientific
knowledge, the validity of analytical techniques, or numerical
risk estimates are clearly disclosed in terms readily
understandable to the public.

SEC. 4. PROPOSED RULES.

(a) Proposed General Rules.--Not later than 180 days after the date
of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall issue, in accordance
with section 3, proposed rules that--
(1) set forth uniform general procedures governing risk
assessments conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency;
and
(2) incorporate, to the extent the Administrator considers
advisable, relevant guidelines existing prior to the issuance
of the proposed rules.
(b) Distinctive Approaches, Techniques, or Methodologies.--
(1) Proposed distinctive rules.--Not later than 1 year
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator
shall issue, in accordance with section 3, proposed rules to
govern use of a distinctive type of risk assessment approach,
technique, or methodology. The rules shall specify the minimum
standard for a risk assessment approach that is appropriate for
the scale of the problem to be assessed, the level of
scientific understanding, and the available data.
(2) Use of distinctive approaches, techniques, or
methodologies.--In accordance with section 3, the Administrator
shall determine the distinctive types of risk assessment
approaches, techniques, or methodologies for which a proposed
rule will be issued pursuant to paragraph (1). The
Administrator shall include risk assessment approaches,
techniques, or methodologies that utilize epidemiological data.
In the case of an approach, a technique, or a methodology not
in use prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the
Administrator shall develop rules to govern the distinctive use
of the approach, technique, or methodology before using the
approach, technique, or methodology in a risk assessment.

SEC. 5. RISK ASSESSMENT REVIEW.

(a) Review Procedures.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall issue procedures, in
accordance with section 3, for the review and revision of a risk
assessment completed prior to the enactment of this Act or the issuance
of final risk assessment rules under section 6.
(b) Basis for Review.--
(1) Criteria for review.--A review of a risk assessment in
accordance with the procedures issued under subsection (a)
shall be conducted by the Administrator on the written petition
of a person if--
(A) the risk assessment is inconsistent with the
principles set forth in section 3;
(B) the risk assessment is inconsistent with a rule
issued under section 4; or
(C) the risk assessment does not take into account
significant new scientific data or scientific
understanding.
(2) Response to petition.--Not later than 60 days after
receiving a petition under paragraph (1), the Administrator
shall respond to the petition by agreeing or declining to
review the risk assessment referred to in the petition, and
shall state the basis for the decision.
(3) Judicial review.--Denial of a petition by the
Administrator shall be subject to judicial review in accordance
with chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code.

SEC. 6. FINAL RULES.

(a) Notice and Comment Procedures.--Not later than 270 days after
the date of enactment of this Act, in accordance with section 553 of
title 5, United States Code, the Administrator shall publish in the
Federal Register a list of risk assessment approaches, techniques, or
methodologies for which a rule shall be issued under subsection (b),
after taking into account comments by the public, Federal agencies,
States, municipalities, experts in the scientific community, and such
other persons as the Administrator considers advisable.
(b) Issuance of Final Rules.--Not later than 1 year after the date
of enactment of this Act, in accordance with sections 3 and 4 of this
Act and section 553 of title 5, United States Code, the Administrator
shall publish in the Federal Register final rules, after taking into
account comments by the public, Federal agencies, States,
municipalities, experts in the scientific community, and such other
persons as the Administrator considers advisable.

SEC. 7. PRIVATE RIGHTS OF ACTION PRECLUDED.

Nothing in this Act shall give rise to a private right of action
seeking damages against the United States or against an agency or
instrumentality of the United States.
A:
Sound Science in Risk Assessment Act - Directs the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop rules and review procedures that provide that: (1) risk assessments are consistent, of high technical quality, scientifically objective, and unbiased; and (2) significant uncertainties regarding facts, scientific knowledge, the validity of analytical techniques, or numerical risk estimates are clearly disclosed in terms readily understandable to the public.
Requires the Administrator to issue proposed rules that: (1) set forth uniform general procedures governing risk assessments conducted by EPA and incorporate relevant guidelines existing prior to the issuance of such rules; and (2) govern use of a distinctive type of risk assessment approach, technique, or methodology.
Directs the Administrator to issue procedures for the review and revision of a risk assessment completed prior to this Act's enactment or the issuance of final risk assessment rules. Permits petitions to the Administrator to perform reviews under certain conditions.
Requires the Administrator to issue final rules for risk assessment approaches, techniques, or methodologies after taking into account comments by the public.