QUES: This technique of representing simultaneity, multiple viewpoints (or relative motion) is pushed to a high degree of complexity in Gleizes' monumental Le Depiquage des Moissons (Harvest Threshing), exhibited at the 1912 Salon de la Section d'Or, Le Fauconnier's Abundance shown at the Independants of 1911, and Delaunay's City of Paris, shown at the Independants in 1912. These ambitious works are some of the largest paintings in the history of Cubism. Leger's The Wedding, also shown at the Salon des Independants in 1912, gave form to the notion of simultaneity by presenting different motifs as occurring within a single temporal frame, where responses to the past and present interpenetrate with collective force. The conjunction of such subject matter with simultaneity aligns Salon Cubism with early Futurist paintings by Umberto Boccioni, Gino Severini and Carlo Carra; themselves made in response to early Cubism.

What did the technique in Gliezes' piece Le Depiquage represent?
What is the answer?
ANS: relative motion)
QUES: Translation is a major obstacle when comparing different cultures. Many English terms lack equivalents in other languages, while concepts and words from other languages fail to be reflected in the English language. Translation and vocabulary obstacles are not limited to the English language. Language can force individuals to identify with a label that may or may not accurately reflect their true sexual orientation. Language can also be used to signal sexual orientation to others. The meaning of words referencing categories of sexual orientation are negotiated in the mass media in relation to social organization. New words may be brought into use to describe new terms or better describe complex interpretations of sexual orientation. Other words may pick up new layers or meaning. For example, the heterosexual Spanish terms marido and mujer for "husband" and "wife", respectively, have recently been replaced in Spain by the gender-neutral terms conyuges or consortes meaning "spouses".

Why does translation cause such issues among different cultures?
What is the answer?
ANS: English terms lack equivalents in other languages, while concepts and words from other languages fail to be reflected in the English language.
QUES: The concept's origins can potentially be traced back further. Jewish law includes several considerations whose effects are similar to those of modern intellectual property laws, though the notion of intellectual creations as property does not seem to exist notably the principle of Hasagat Ge'vul (unfair encroachment) was used to justify limited-term publisher (but not author) copyright in the 16th century. In 500 BCE, the government of the Greek state of Sybaris offered one year's patent "to all who should discover any new refinement in luxury".

Jewish law includes which principle used to justify copyright?
What is the answer?
ANS:
Hasagat Ge'vul (unfair encroachment)