Question: Sentence A: Low-income households must negotiate legal issues to satisfy their basic needs for food, housing, health care, personal safety and education.

Sentence B: Low income households don't have to negotiate legal issues.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: In one of them, a congressional hearing on the minimum wage becomes an attack ad as Rep.
There was a congressional hearing about the minimum wage.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
mail used by non-households to send and pay bills to other non-households).

Here is a hypothesis:
To send and pay bills to non-households, other non-households use mail.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: yeah but uh those are all great the the interesting thing we're getting ready to have a house built

Sentence 2: We are going to build a house as big as the White House
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
and it was a new Ford so the automobiles that that i have uh

Does it follow that "The Ford was second hand"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "The man was a fool he had been incredibly, unbelievably stupid.", can we conclude that "The man made so many stupid and foolish choices."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell