instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Eliza Kashinsky, you are a sorry, sorry case. Are you so unsure of your dogma that you have to hide your identity?

I have no financial interests in Eugene real estate other than the single-family home I bought when you were just a pain in some parents' eyes.

Yet, in contrast to your ignorance about Eugene development practices, I could qualify as a real estate genius. The redevelopment of the SW-SAZ, _against the will of the community_, would displace working folks in affordable, single-family homes with higher cost condos and apartments.

Please go back to defending the poor, downtrodden atheists (like myself), as you were doing before you moved to Eugene.

-- Paul
answer:
No

question:
Ok, now we're back to my point. Unfortunately, it is apparent that pedestrians (and probably bikers too) need explicit instructions to help them ensure their own safety. The feel good rhetoric on the city's website is not enough; its not working.

The final draft of Vision Zero needs to be something tangible, not rhetoric. Otherwise, it seems people will continue to let themselves "be killed at alarming rates", such as walking into travel lanes. Since it is the pedestrians and bikers who are the ones being "killed", why continue resisting pro-active safety measures that bikers and pedestrians can use to help themselves stay alive?

To make a real difference, I would think in terms of a since and frank resolution that applies exclusively to the vulnerable. There are all kinds of forums that apply specifically to consumers, as a self-help tool preventing them from being ripped-off. It works for consumers, why not for pedestrians and bikers?
answer:
No

question:
Does Ms. Millett know anything except for when she received her monthly paycheck? : )
answer:
No