This is the content of an email: eSource presents Global Access training Global Access offers an online connection to complete company information and filings via content that includes Disclosure, Worldscope, Datastream and I/B/E/S. The product is designed to allow users to get complete company information such as financials, filings, databases and news for thousands of US and International companies from a single source. Training Agenda Includes: ? General Introduction. ? Basic Reference View Query (Which provides an itemized list of all available source data.) ? Basic Business View Query (Which pulls source data from various Global Access content, and displays it in a presentation summary). Attend our Global Access Clinic: May. 16 - 9:00 -10:00 AM EB572

Subject: eSource Presents Free Global Access Training

This is the content of an email: Sara: What we have negotiated with Southern was limited to financial trades done under the ISDA. This was a form that they sent to us that we revised. It was my understanding that they were going to contact Leslie separately about EPMI physical trades and Stacy about physical gas trades. Carol.

Subject: Confirmation Reply Letter

This is the content of an email: I got the memo from Naomi that you sent. First, who is Doug Imrie? Does he have a strong background in trading operations? Will he be able to coordinate effective reviews from a controls perspective, and will he be able to be the front-runner on how MG runs its business so that we will get a jump start on how best to assimilate the business? I think that this effort should be much broader than deal testing. It should encompass assessing people, processes, controls, systems support, etc. To do this quickly and effectively will require persons who are knowledgeable about daily trading operations. I don't know Naomi's background, but I wonder if she will be the right person to lead one of these efforts since she does not work in operations on a daily basis. Patrick Conner left me a message today to be certain that we are plugged in with an appropriate team from ENA to review the Chicago and New York offices. From the sound of Naomi's memo, it looks as if Andy Cornfield is assume to have the US responsibility. Again, I don't know Andy. Should we circle the wagons and develop a plan for doorstep reviews that includes some others in the process, particularly those that have been involved in some doorstep reviews to date and those that have daily operational experience? I have also mentioned Shona as a good resource as well.

Subject: Merlin Doorstep Reviews

This is the content of an email: Stan felt it would be appropriate for the Policy Committee to review the attached changes to the Analyst / Associate PRC process, prior to execution. In summary, the following modifications have been developed by the heads of the AAPRC Committees (Horton, Kean, and Sherriff) and A/A Program Management (Lemmons): ? Most cross-calibration will be at the business unit level, since this is where the best interaction and information gathering occurs. Steps to ensure consistency across the business units are outlined in the memo. The final PRC meeting will focus on business unit ranking distributions, and the names/attributes of the top performers across the company. ? The PRC committees have been expanded to improve the quality of representation, and to reflect the diversity of our workforce. The additions were selected from a pool of high performing VPs and Directors. To ensure fairness, only VPs and Directors will provide representation on the AAPRC Committee. ? An attachment has been included to clarify program tenure and promotion criteria. Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss by mid-day Wednesday, May 9. We are planning to release this information to the memo distribution list that evening. Regards,
Subject: Policy Committee Review - Analyst/Associate Program PRC Process