In this task, you are given the abstract of a research paper. Your task is to generate a summary of this abstract. Your summary should not be very short, but it's better if it's not more than 30 words.

Input: Consider Input: This paper considers multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) in networked system control. Specifically, each agent learns a decentralized control policy based on local observations and messages from connected neighbors. We formulate such a networked MARL (NMARL) problem as a spatiotemporal Markov decision process and introduce a spatial discount factor to stabilize the training of each local agent. Further, we propose a new differentiable communication protocol, called NeurComm, to reduce information loss and non-stationarity in NMARL. Based on experiments in realistic NMARL scenarios of adaptive traffic signal control and cooperative adaptive cruise control, an appropriate spatial discount factor effectively enhances the learning curves of non-communicative MARL algorithms, while NeurComm outperforms existing communication protocols in both learning efficiency and control performance.

Output: This paper proposes a new formulation and a new communication protocol for networked multi-agent control problems

Input: Consider Input: Hierarchical label structures widely exist in many machine learning tasks, ranging from those with explicit label hierarchies such as image classification to the ones that have latent label hierarchies such as semantic segmentation. Unfortunately, state-of-the-art methods often utilize cross-entropy loss which in-explicitly assumes the independence among class labels. Motivated by the fact that class members from the same hierarchy need to be similar to each others, we design a new training diagram called Hierarchical Complement Objective Training (HCOT). In HCOT, in addition to maximizing the probability of the ground truth class, we also neutralize the probabilities of rest of the classes in a hierarchical fashion, making the model take advantage of the label hierarchy explicitly. We conduct our method on both image classification and semantic segmentation. Results show that HCOT outperforms state-of-the-art models in CIFAR100, Imagenet, and PASCAL-context. Our experiments also demonstrate that HCOT can be applied on tasks with latent label hierarchies, which is a common characteristic in many machine learning tasks.

Output: We propose Hierarchical Complement Objective Training, a novel training paradigm to effectively leverage category hierarchy in the labeling space on both image classification and semantic segmentation.

Input: Consider Input: The goal of standard compressive sensing is to estimate an unknown vector from linear measurements under the assumption of sparsity in some basis. Recently, it has been shown that significantly fewer measurements may be required if the sparsity assumption is replaced by the assumption that the unknown vector lies near the range of a suitably-chosen generative model. In particular, in (Bora {\em et al.}, 2017) it was shown that roughly $O(k\log L)$ random Gaussian measurements suffice for accurate recovery when the $k$-input generative model is bounded and $L$-Lipschitz, and that $O(kd \log w)$ measurements suffice for $k$-input ReLU networks with depth $d$ and width $w$. In this paper, we establish corresponding algorithm-independent lower bounds on the sample complexity using tools from minimax statistical analysis. In accordance with the above upper bounds, our results are summarized as follows: (i) We construct an $L$-Lipschitz generative model capable of generating group-sparse signals, and show that the resulting necessary number of measurements is $\Omega(k \log L)$; (ii) Using similar ideas, we construct two-layer ReLU networks of high width requiring $\Omega(k \log w)$ measurements, as well as lower-width deep ReLU networks requiring $\Omega(k d)$ measurements. As a result, we establish that the scaling laws derived in (Bora {\em et al.}, 2017) are optimal or near-optimal in the absence of further assumptions.
Output: We establish that the scaling laws derived in (Bora et al., 2017) are optimal or near-optimal in the absence of further assumptions.