In this task, you are given books product reviews in English language. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative.

Example Input: Novel goes nowhere, can't believe this won something . Talk about a waste of time! I was wondering if it was just me so I asked several friends who dutifully read this prize winner and they said they could barely get through it. It is boring, tells you instead of shows you, hyperactively jumps around the timeline like a flea and provides no payoff at all. I also found the protrayal of the grandmother's flirtation with Islam to be shallow, un-informed, unbelievable and ultimately dismissive. Don't waste your time on this or your money. Luckily I had picked it up at a book sale for $0.25, about what it was worth
Example Output: NEG

Example Input: Myth under the guise of 'science'- A warning from a professional logician . If you want to read a Classic of Western Mythology, look no further. This is specious philosophy under the guise of a supposed 'truth' about reality. The tragedy of all this is noticing other reviewers' comments about how the contents of this book negatively influenced their lives. Dawkins belief that we are machines created by our genes is a misleading view of reality, and when evolutionary 'science' catches up with evolutionary 'philosophy,' this view will come out false. This could only be taken seriously by those who are so blinded by the details that they can no longer think straight, so they are not able to figure out where the argument is wrong, let alone realize something IS wrong with it. What almost everyone doesn't seem to understand, even about VALID arguments is this: ALL a valid argument does is set up a tug of war between the premises being true and the conclusion being false. If the conclusion is OUTRAGEOUS, you don't, "bite the bullet," "swallow the medicine," and accept the conclusion anyway. You say there MUST be something wrong with the premises, even if you can't point out where the mistake is. It took some 2,000 years before someone came up with a solution to why Zeno's argument that 'nothing moves' is incorrect. But during that period of time, NO ONE (except maybe a few fools here and there- probably 'intellectuals' like this Dawkins character) accepted the conclusion that nothing moves
Example Output: NEG

Example Input: Finally read this cult favorite: YEAH! . What a magical book! The Mellon family inherits The Pink Motel on the Florida coast and moves down for the summer to run it. There they meet an assortment of regular guests and find some new ones. The children, Kirby and Bitsy, make friends with a local boy named Big and revive a bored girl guest named Sandra. Secrets, mysteries, alligator chasing, coconuts, wonderful treats from Miss Frith's basket, and some very, very valuable dog guests make for a lively and engaging story. For 1951, the integration between white and black children is natural and straightforward. This is the kind of book I would like to write. I sure enjoyed reading it.
Example Output:
POS