In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: "It doesn't keep elections 'pure' it just drives the money into STUPID AREAS"

Well, that's a useful bunch of gibberish. It's not like there aren't elections all around the world with campaign finance laws that work quite well.

"You want to get good candidates get rid of every restriction BUT the REPORTING requirements."

Here's a better idea: leave every candidate with limited but equal financing -- so that candidates focus solely on explaining why their policy is superior to all others -- and every citizen, whether billionaire or hobo has but one equal voice.

It's "one man one vote" not "one dollar one vote."
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: John Ibbetsen is correct again, as usual. Trump is an unmitigated disaster waiting to happen, and it's only going to get worse. His childish ego and his cluelessness will wreck any good will the USA has left in the world.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Who cares if they've had snaps as Ducks? We have a stable of highly-rated QBs raring to go. Stop whining about the past. There's a new season coming on, or hadn't you heard?
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack