Detailed Instructions: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. The four incorrect answers are other holding statements. You should find the correct option. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Q: Angelina Damitas Echeverria-Ruiz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing her appeal ng that it is "more likely than not" that the government would persecute her upon return to Guatemala. See Hakeem, 273 F.3d at 816. Echeverria-Ruiz's due process claim fails, because even if the corroborating declaration were given full weight, it would merely confirm rather than add to other evidence in the record, and EcheverriaRuiz would still be unable to establish entitlement to withholding of removal. See Halaim v. INS, 358 F.3d 1128, 1136 (9th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). Echeverria-Ruiz did not raise, and therefore
Holding statements: (A) holding that an alien must show error and substantial prejudice in order to prevail on a due process claim (B) holding that a petitioner must show prejudice in order to prevail on a claim that he or she was denied a full and fair hearing in violation of due process (C) holding that to prevail on a claim that an immigration hearing was procedurally insufficient the petitioner must demonstrate prejudice (D) holding that an alien must establish that he was prejudiced by the alleged error in order to prevail on a due process claim (E) holding petitioner must show prejudice to prevail on due process claim
A:
(E)