Premise:
"While self-regulatory approaches can and have worked in various situations, there are certain instances in which it is unrealistic for them to work as effectively as needed in order to adequately protect the public interest."
Hypothesis: Self-regulatory approaches can and have worked during very difficult times.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: Arriving by boat gives you splendid views of the magnificent unspoiled, treeless landscape, which bears scant evidence of the hand of man. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The treeless landscape goes on for over ten miles."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "For all resources needed for installation, it is assumed that these resources are required over a 31-month period prior to 2005 and a three-year period prior to 2010, 2015, and 2020.", can we conclude that "We assume that the resources are required for installation."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: But putting Greenspan (or his successor) into the picture restores much of the classical vision of the macroeconomy.

Sentence B: Greenspan's policies have been traditional in the past.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: You might just as likely find yourself in the pit instead of watching it from above.
You can either be in the pit or above the pit.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Station Jesus is stripped; Station Jesus is nailed on to the crose and Station Jesus dies on the crose

Here is a hypothesis:
Jesus is stripped as he is nailed to the cross but he may have died from other causes.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell