In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
One example is below.
Q: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
A: Sexual-explicit
Rationale: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.
Q: Comment: Yes, but...

Not every country/culture has the same view on human rights. We constantly virtue-signal and tell other cultures how we have it right and they have it wrong. Rooted in Greek/Roman law and Greek/Roman rational thought process, our laws, worldview, and culture have produced our current societies. You cannot legislate laws to peoples have not gone through the same democratic evolution that Western civilization has gone through. Nor can these cultures co-exist peacefully, because they are vastly different at their fundamental core. It isn't that one is better or worse, it is just different. A tribal-based culture functions much differently. There is no room for individualism, because the survival of the whole depends upon a homogenous mindset.

It is extremely arrogant of the West to think that just because we say so, it is so. It is also dangerous. Hasn't the current mess in the ME taught us anything?
A:
Non-sexual-explicit