Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: OV,

Let's say your view is 100% spot-on. Oregon democrats found away to tax businesses with annual sales in Oregon above $25 million with a 2.5% rate with no, nada, nyet, 0 effect on Oregonians. Hurray! Yowza! Raise that 2.5% another .05%! How long do you think it will be before other states take notice and go for that "free" money also? Do you think that will affect corporate national pricing strategy? If so, it will only be a matter of time before Oregonians are "trickled" on.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: If this won't convince you to kill your television, nothing will.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Sure wealth accumulation from a gormless citizenry through hot air blasting over monster speakers containing certitude of an invisible power only available through self-appointed agents wielding absolute political power. Religious tax scofflaws brought in to aid the Republican dictatorship to certify the destruction of the governing system to allow monster corporations to finish the looting of the state. A feudal religion born in Empire demanding return to religious theocracy enslaving all and inquisition for all dissent. The death of democracy and the Constitutional Republic orchestrated by traitors infesting every facet of the human experience.
[EX A]:
Yes