In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: hey muslim traitor, go back to your native kenya, STFU, or
you will die

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: "It doesn't keep elections 'pure' it just drives the money into STUPID AREAS"

Well, that's a useful bunch of gibberish. It's not like there aren't elections all around the world with campaign finance laws that work quite well.

"You want to get good candidates get rid of every restriction BUT the REPORTING requirements."

Here's a better idea: leave every candidate with limited but equal financing -- so that candidates focus solely on explaining why their policy is superior to all others -- and every citizen, whether billionaire or hobo has but one equal voice.

It's "one man one vote" not "one dollar one vote."

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Let's start with not referring to that couple dozen jerks in the Leg that insisted on this in the first place. THEY screwed 'the state' and it's pretty clear their by a clear margin even their own constituents don't support their decision. The only question is whether those same outraged people will swallow their principles, yet again, and enable these clearly nonrepresentive chuckleheads to continue along their merry way and be shocked with they do it again. Anyone that is spending that much time measuring for drapes isn't doing their job in the first place.

A:
Non-identity-attack
****