IN: This is an email
Barry, It was nice talking with you this morning. As promised, below you will find my contact information. I will give you a call when scheduling my next trip to Houston to arrange a meeting. Best regards,

What is the subject?

OUT: Contact Info

IN: This is an email
In conversations with GE, it is their understanding that their guaranty will not be transmitted until there is a fed ref number tomorrow. The opinion letter will be faxed as soon as the GC is available, or Kent can sign for Dan Rowley if that is acceptable. DRowley can sign originals on Thursday. The LOC is in the works, and GE understands that 10% will be retained in escrow until the LOC is delivered. There will be three original opinions. There is one original guaranty, and I'm not certain of GE's willingness to give more than that. Obviously, there will be only one LOC. Kay

What is the subject?

OUT: GE guaranty, opinion of counsel and letter of credit

IN: This is an email
Dear Vince J Kaminski, As a Mathematical Trading and Finance MSc student (City University London) I am writing my dissertation on "power forward curves". Since you have participated in the writing of the book "Managing Energy Price" I was wondering if you could eventually help me. The MRHV model seams to be the best econometric one to model the electricity forward curve. I understand and know how to work out with the classic Mean Reverting Process, but I don't understand the MRHV (I don't know the discretised form and I cannot even find any paper, or article on it) and how to get rid of the exponent to estimate my parameters (long-run mean, Speed of mean reversion, volatility, exponent, Floor price). Thank you by advance for any help Yours sincerely

What is the subject?

OUT:
MRHV Model (power curve)