In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: So muslims repeatedly threaten to wipe Israel off the face of the earth, kill the USA- "the Great Satan", continue to violently attack anyone they find vulnerable, behead people & burn them alive ..... yet the cerebrally challenged politically correct (whatever that really means morphs daily to suit the current situation) voices seem to think acting positively to protect your own is not acceptable. They fear that direct, effective counter measures may "offend" someone. That is ridiculous & self defeating.
Just as the USA reacted to the Jap attack on Pearl Harbor, we need to act effectively to eliminate all terrorism.
Attempts to cloak islamic terrorism as acceptable because it is based on a "religion" is obviously a red herring. Islam is far from a religion as most of us conceive religion to be. Islam is a theocracy aimed at political, economic, & thought control by those who direct it.

A: Threat
****
Q: Comment: 'But lobbying isn't just about money. It's about access and persuasion'. jesus! dumbest statement in months.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: Natives in villages get handcuffed and dragged to airplanes every day. And it's seldom in the news. When there's no law enforcement in Togiak how are the local people supposed to deal with a guy bringing in alcohol? My advice to the people of Togiak is to stick to the traditional way of dealing with bad guys: stuff them under the ice.

A:
Threat
****