In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: It means that instead of blandly assuming less regulation is better than more or more competition is better than less, you have to study the specifics of each case very carefully. Choices: 1. Studying the specifics of every case is what it means. 2. If you don't study the specifics, you won't get it right. 3. There's no need to study the specifics, not at all.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: Hornby still writes with warmth and charm. Choices: 1. The writing of Hornby is entirely cold and stark. 2. There is warmth and charm in Hornby's writing. 3. Hornby mainly writes children's stories with illustrations.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: From the top of a hefty climb up the tower are breathtaking views of Segovia and the valley beyond. Choices: 1. There is no tower near Segovia, the next one is kilometers apart. 2. Most of the tourists like to visit the tower in order to see Segovia. 3. Beautiful views of Segovia can be seen from the top of the tower.
[EX A]:
1