QUESTION: I have attached the referenced spreadsheet, changing my product approvals to add the new product list that Stephanie sent me (instead of th eold list Credit sent me). One of the new products appears to be Austrian physical power. Like the other European based physical power products, it should not be opened for the US based credit counterparties to trade, so I will not be marking it out on a going forward basis, I will just expect it to be shut down for the US based counerparties (unless I tell you otherwise on a particular one). Is that OK with you. Also, for Sempra, they will be coming by again on the 7/21 list (Credit opened them up for all financial power). I had already opened them up for all financial products except weather, so it shouldn't affect my approval.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Counterparty Approval List for 7/18/00
During the past few weeks, we have received numerous requests for information about XMS, both from employees who are unfamiliar with XMS, and from current users who want to better understand how XMS has changed since filing for bankruptcy. In response, we developed XMS Update Training. This brown bag session will cover the following agenda items: Approver level Expensing Cash Advance Expense reports; current employees vs. terminated employees How to select a "Profile" How to set up multiple approvers How to submit expenses for contractors Reviewing status Receipt Report "Barcode" What is "Resubmit" Who do I call for help? The session will be Tuesday, April 23, 11:30am-1:00pm in EB5C2. To register, please select the "Accept - Tuesday, April 23rd" button. You will receive an email to confirm your attendance. Remember, register today, space is limited! If you are unable to attend this session but are interested in a future session, please select the "Interested in a future session" button. You will be contacted in the event another session is planned.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: XMS Update Training!
fyi. also, I just spoke with Sarah Wesner (ext. 35261) who will coordinate with you. You can review the note with her and let's talk about their guaranty (will our guaranty format work?). Also, I'm almost inclined to go with their commitment letter (if revised) in lieu of a lengthier agreement. SS
Answer: Differences
Here is an email: Please be advised that a conference call regarding the above-referenced has been set for Friday, June 23, 2000, 10:30am central time. The dial in number for this call is 1-800-998-2462. The pincode is 4309724.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Project Stanley Conference Call
Q: CONFIDENTIAL Because many of the same people would be involved in the below-referenced telecons, both of which relate to developing public and gov relations strategies, some in the context of legal issues, I have scheduled a one hour conference call, half hour each for Roseville and the DC Line to SF. I have indicated who at least I would like involved in each conversation. The rest of you can feel free to listen on the whole thing, or drop off or call in as appropriate. If I have left anyone out of the list, please call me to discuss, as I would like to restrict these discussions to the recipients of the email. (Mark - if you wish Eric or Karen to participate, no problem.) The call in number for both calls will be 800-820-4690 (passcode: 7012645#) 1:00 - 1:30pm: ROSEVILLE "Required" participants Wehn Brodbeck Jones Russeth Govenar(s) ISSUE - Butte county APCD is resisting the transfer of certain ERCs that we own from Butte county to Placer county for our Roseville project. I want to discuss who knows who and which of them we can call to enlist support for our position. For example, Kelly has already petitioned CARB, who have said that this is not right and will pressure them. I will get a letter from the ISO indicating the general economic support our Roseville project will have to the area, including Butte. Dean Russell and Rick Johnson are going to get the support of the Building Trades because of the obvious risk on jobs. I would guess that all of Kelly's new-found farmer friends (sorry, they are called growers out here) can make a few phone calls. I am sure that Scott and Heady can find some political friends in Sacto that we can call. Etc. Please come to the telecon with a list of who you have already contacted, and who we may consider contacting. In the interest of time, I want to set the stage for giving Kelly and Sam some clear guidelines and assignments. Then we can let them do their work and report. And we can get on to the next subject. 1:30 - 2:00 pm: DC LINE TO SF "Required" Participants Palmer Russeth Govenar(s) Etringer Gray Dasovich Rasmussen ISSUE - As we have discussed, we are developing a strategy that, if successful, would result in a transmission line solution to SF's electrical problems. I would like this telecon to be a kick off to discussing/developing a PR and Government relations strategy. Each of you have reviewed my summary email of last week (I have attached a copy for Dasovich and Palmer), so I will not repeat here. It is for the most part self explanatory on issues, status, benefits, etc. Please bring to the telecon your thoughts.
Propose a subject line
A: Public and government telecon re SF DC line and Roseville ERCs/Butte County issue
Here is an email: Here's one for you to chew on for awhile. As we approach the transition to a new organizational structure in ET&S, let's rethink the role and competencies of the legal department. I'd like each of you to answer the following questions and circulate your answers to me and each other. To avoid having anyone's answers unduly influenced by anyone else's, please send your responses at 12 noon on Thursday. No, this isn't being graded, and doesn't affect the PRC process or any other process. I just want to get access to as much original thinking as possible. 1. What is the ET&S law dept. currently best at? (give one example). 2. What is the ET&S law dept. currently worst at? (give one example). 3. Without regard for any past objectives, what should our top 3 objectives be? (make these very specific--objectives like "We should manage legal and
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
New ET&S Law Objectives