Given a paragraph, generate a claim that is supported by the given paragraph. 1) The claim must contain information from within the paragraph. 2) A sentence within the paragraph can be used as a claim. 3) The claim should not have contradictions within the paragraph. 4) The claim should be at most one sentence long.
One example: "Although the story didn't cite the cost of appendectomy emergency or urgent surgery and we wish it had, we nonetheless will give it a satisfactory score because it at least cited what the editorial writer wrote, ""A secondary benefit is the savings to the hospital generated by minimizing staff and anesthesiologist presence late in the evening and during the wee hours of the morning."" As with our harms score above, although the story didn't give absolute numbers, in this case we think it was sufficient for it to report that ""The scientists found no significant difference among the groups in the patients' condition 30 days after surgery or in the length of their operation or hospital stay."" Although the story didn't give absolute numbers, in this case we think it was sufficient for it to report that ""The scientists found no significant difference among the groups in the patients' condition 30 days after surgery or in the length of their operation or hospital stay."" Despite running less than 300 words, this story did an adequate job in explaining the quality of the evidence, including pointing out limitations. No disease-mongering here. The story meets the bare minimum requirement for this criterion in that it at least cited what an editorial stated. The focus of the story was on a study comparing emergency appendectomy with surgery done up to 12 hours later or beyond. This is the whole focus of the story and one we applaud when it begins: ""Appendectomy is the most common emergency surgery in the world, but it doesn't have to be."" There were no claims made about the novelty of this research, and we may have wished for a bit more context on this. Nonetheless, the potential for guiding future care decisions was made clear. Not applicable. Given that the story only pulled excerpts from the journal article and the accompanying editorial, and didn't include any fresh quotes from interviews, we can't be sure of the extent to which it may have been influenced by a news release."
Solution is here: Some appendicitis cases may not require 'emergency' surgery
Explanation: The paragraph mentions that "Appendectomy is the most common emergency surgery in the world, but it doesn't have to be." which is considered evidence for the output. Thus, the output is a valid claim.

Now, solve this: A passenger waits for a delayed flight at Heathrow airport's terminal four in London August 12, 2006. REUTERS/Toby Melville The findings show that bariatric surgery, an increasingly popular operation, benefits patients' health and saves money, according to Pierre-Yves Cremieux of the economic consulting firm Analysis Group and the University of Quebec at Montreal, who led the study. Bariatric surgery alters the digestive system's anatomy, reducing the volume of food that can be eaten and digested. The most common form is gastric bypass, which makes the stomach smaller and permits food to bypass part of the small intestine. Some insurers have been reluctant to cover this surgery. "It demonstrates the fact that this is not cosmetic surgery," Cremieux said in a telephone interview. "The reason why you get your money back when you cover bariatric surgery is because the patients who were morbidly obese before and had high rates of diabetes and hypertension no longer do. They don't go to the doctor as much as they used to, and they don't go to the emergency room as much as they used to. Why? Because they are healthier," Cremieux added. How quickly an insurer recovered the costs of paying for bariatric surgery depended on the type performed, Cremieux reported in the American Journal of Managed Care. Insurers fully recovered the expense of covering minimally invasive bariatric surgery, which on average cost $17,000, within about two years, the study showed. They fully recovered the expense of more common bariatric procedures such as traditional gastric bypass surgery, which on average cost $26,000, within about four years. After surgery, the obese patients lost weight and incurred lower costs associated with prescription drugs, doctor visits and hospital services as they became healthier and less burdened by chronic disease, the researchers said. The researchers based the findings on insurance claims filed by 3,651 morbidly obese bariatric surgery patients and insurance claims filed by an equal number of morbidly obese people who did not have weight-loss surgery. It spanned six months of pre-surgical evaluation and care, the operation and up to five years of post-surgical care. Those who did not have surgery also were tracked for five years. The average age of the surgical patients was 44 and most were women. They began the study with obesity-related ailments like high blood pressure, diabetes and sleep apnea. Previous research has found that obese people who have weight-loss surgery are less likely to die from heart disease, diabetes and cancer than obese people who do not have such surgery. An estimated 205,000 people had bariatric surgery in the United States last year. The study was funded by Johnson & Johnson's Ethicon Endo-Surgery division, which makes instruments for bariatric surgery.
Solution:
Insurers recoup obesity surgery cost in 2-4 years.