In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
One example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution is here: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Explanation: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

Now, solve this: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Federal Consent Decree Fairness
Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds that the United States Supreme Court, in its
unanimous decision in Frew v. Hawkins, 540 U.S. 431 (2004), found the
following:
(1) Consent decrees may ''lead to federal court oversight
of state programs for long periods of time even absent an
ongoing violation of federal law,''. 540 U.S. 431, 441.
(2) ''If not limited to reasonable and necessary
implementations of federal law, remedies outlined in consent
decrees involving state officeholders may improperly deprive
future officials of their designated legislative and executive
powers.''. 540 U.S. 431, 441.
(3) ''The federal court must exercise its equitable powers
to ensure that when the objects of the decree have been
attained, responsibility for discharging the State's
obligations is returned promptly to the State and its
officials.''. 540 U.S. 431, 442.
(4) ''As public servants, the officials of the State must
be presumed to have a high degree of competence in deciding how
best to discharge their governmental responsibilities.''. 540
U.S. 431, 442.
(5) ''A State, in the ordinary course, depends upon
successor officials, both appointed and elected, to bring new
insights and solutions to problems of allocating revenues and
resources. The basic obligations of federal law may remain the
same, but the precise manner of their discharge may not.''. 540
U.S. 431, 442.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON CONSENT DECREES.

(a) In General.--Chapter 111 of title 28, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following:
''Sec. 1660. Consent decrees
''(a) Definition.--In this section, the term 'consent decree'--
''(1) means any order imposing injunctive or other
prospective relief against a State or local government, or a
State or local official against whom suit is brought, that is
entered by a court of the United States and is based in whole
or part upon the consent or acquiescence of the parties; and
''(2) does not include--
''(A) any private settlement agreement;
''(B) any order arising from an action filed
against a government official that is unrelated to his
or her official duties;
''(C) any order entered by a court of the United
States to implement a plan to end segregation of
students or faculty on the basis of race, color, or
national origin in elementary schools, secondary
schools, or institutions of higher education; and
''(D) any order entered in any action in which one
State is an adverse party to another State.
''(b) Limitation on Duration.--
''(1) In general.--A State or local government, or a State
or local official who is a party to a consent decree (or the
successor to that individual) may file a motion under this
section with the court that entered the consent decree to
modify or terminate the consent decree upon the earliest of--
''(A) 4 years after the consent decree is
originally entered by a court of the United States,
regardless of whether the consent decree has been
modified or reentered during that period;
''(B) in the case of a civil action in which a
State or an elected State official is a party, the date
of expiration of the term of office of the highest
elected State official who is a party to the consent
decree;
''(C) in the case of a civil action in which a
local government or elected local government official
is a party, the date of expiration of the term of
office of the highest elected local government official
who is a party to the consent decree;
''(D) in the case of a civil action in which the
consent to the consent decree was authorized by an
appointed State or local official, the date of
expiration of the term of office of the elected
official who appointed that State or local official, or
the highest elected official in that State or local
government; or
''(E) the date otherwise provided by law.
''(2) Burden of proof.--
''(A) In general.--With respect to any motion filed
under paragraph (1), the burden of proof shall be on
the party who originally filed the civil action to
demonstrate that the denial of the motion to modify or
terminate the consent decree or any part of the consent
decree is necessary to prevent the violation of a
requirement of Federal law that--
''(i) was actionable by such party; and
''(ii) was addressed in the consent decree.
''(B) Failure to meet burden of proof.--If a party
fails to meet the burden of proof described in
subparagraph (A), the court shall terminate the consent
decree.
''(C) Satisfaction of burden of proof.--If a party
meets the burden of proof described in subparagraph
(A), the court shall ensure that any remaining
provisions of the consent decree represent the least
restrictive means by which to prevent such a violation.
''(3) Ruling on motion.--
''(A) In general.--The court shall rule
expeditiously on a motion filed under this subsection.
''(B) Scheduling order.--Not later than 30 days
after the filing of a motion under this subsection, the
court shall enter a scheduling order that--
''(i) limits the time of the parties to--
''(I) file motions; and
''(II) complete any required
discovery; and
''(ii) sets the date or dates of any
hearings determined necessary.
''(C) Stay of injunctive or prospective relief.--In
addition to any other orders authorized by law, the
court may stay the injunctive or prospective relief set
forth in the consent decree in an action under this
subsection if a party opposing the motion to modify or
terminate the consent decree seeks any continuance or
delay that prevents the court from entering a final
ruling on the motion within 180 days after the date on
which the motion is filed.
''(c) Other Federal Court Remedies.--The provisions of this section
shall not be interpreted to prohibit a Federal court from entering a
new order for injunctive or prospective relief to the extent that it is
otherwise authorized by Federal law.
''(d) Available State Court Remedies.--The provisions of this
section shall not prohibit the parties to a consent decree from seeking
appropriate relief under State law.''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 111 of
title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the
following:

''1660. Consent decrees.''.

SEC. 4. GENERAL PRINCIPLES.

(a) No Effect on Other Laws Relating to Modifying or Vacating
Consent Decrees.--Nothing in the amendments made by section 3 shall be
construed to preempt or modify any other provision of law providing for
the modification or vacating of a consent decree.
(b) Further Proceedings Not Required.--Nothing in the amendments
made by section 3 shall be construed to affect or require further
judicial proceedings relating to prior adjudications of liability or
class certifications.

SEC. 5. DEFINITION.

In this Act, the term ''consent decree'' has the meaning given that
term in section 1660(a) of title 28, United States Code, as added by
section 3 of this Act.

SEC. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on
the date of the enactment of this Act and apply to any consent decree
regardless of--
(1) the date on which the order of the consent decree is
entered; or
(2) whether any relief has been obtained under the consent
decree before such date of enactment.
Solution:
Federal Consent Decree Fairness Act - Amends the federal judicial code to authorize any state or local government or related official (or successor) to file a motion to modify or terminate a federal consent decree upon the earliest of: (1) four years after the consent decree is originally entered; (2) in the case of a civil action in which a state or state official, or a local government or local government official, is a party, the expiration date of the term of office of the highest state or local government official who is a party to the consent decree; or (3) a date otherwise provided by law.

Places the burden of proof with respect to such motions on the party originally filing the action to demonstrate that the denial of the motion to modify or terminate a consent decree (or any part of it) is necessary to prevent the violation of a federal requirement that was: (1) actionable by such party, and (2) addressed in the consent decree.

Requires a court, within 30 days after the filing of a motion, to enter a scheduling order that: (1) limits the time of the parties to file motions and complete discovery, and (2) sets the date or dates of any necessary hearings.

Authorizes a court to stay the injunctive or prospective relief set forth in the consent decree if a party opposing the motion to modify or terminate it seeks any continuance or delay that prevents the court from entering a final ruling on the motion within 180 days after its filing.