Sentence 1: The article is supposedly an exclusive ...

Sentence 2: The article is probably an exclusive.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
As a dominant buyer, Office Behemoth could command concessions from Paper Clip Inc.

Does it follow that "Office Behemoth has no leverage to command concessions."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If The huge royal palace of Fontainebleau is an elegant monument to the Renaissance tastes of Francois I and Henri IV, although subsequent monarchs added on and generally refurbished., can we say that "Fontainebleau is a huge palace of over four hundred acres."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Several local residents are said to have caught a glimpse of him but there is no firm evidence to support this claim."
Hypothesis: Local people said they saw a glimpse of him.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: This augments future income, although a portion of the income generated by the investment will be paid to foreign lenders. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Foreign lenders will not be paid soon "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Q: If Do you want to lie on beaches or hike in mountains?, can we say that "It's impossible to actually lie on the beaches."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
no