Dear Sir/Madam, This will introduce an exceptional Candidate for an Executive Level Information Security position. He has 19 years of VP level Information Security development, implementation and management at several of the most technologically advanced financial institutions including a $6 Billion/year stock brokerage (1995 - 2001), a $12 billion/year financial services conglomerate with interests in mutual funds, life insurance, banking and retirement services ( 1990- 1995), and a $50 billion/year bank( 1989-1990). He holds an MS in Systems Engineering and a BS in Mathematics. PhD course work completed. He is a Certified Information Systems Security Professional ( CISSP) and a Registered Brokerage Rep: Series 7 and Series 63. His primary love is building global Information Security programs and departments. He is receptive to working for smaller institutions and to relocation. For additional information on this candidate or to enquire about other Information Security executives please contact Gary Erlinger. Note: CIO Club is a Fee Based Staffing Organization. Regards
Answer: Information Security Executive -101901
Here is an email: We will have a group class on OA tomorrow around 9:00 am in EB3268. THis is an effort to get you guys up to speed on OA so you can review forms and I can take 3 hour lunches. See you there. PL
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: OA class
Q: Tim, my understanding is that partnership fee (the $11.0M) has been amortized for the last several years and expensed to the Industrial groups (McConville and Ondarza). As you are aware, I sued them for breach. The settlement involved the elimination of all existing transactions between Ft. James and Enron including the Wauna and Halsey power contracts. It is my understanding that the benefit of the elimination of those shorts resides in the Portland shop. The elimination of the shorts would not have occurred without the lawsuit on the alliance and the settlement I originated. It seemed logical to charge the Portland office with the remaining un-amortized fee of $1.8M as a cost of eliminating the shorts for no cost and no future contingent liability. Lets discuss. Regards
Propose a subject line
A: Fort James Amortization
IN: Please let me know if you would like a copy of the interconnection agreement filed by Entergy as described below. It is a revision of an agreement previously approved by FERC effective 9/25/00. Susan Scott Lindberg

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Entergy Arkansas/Wrightsville interconnection agreement
IN: This is an email
adele: Just wanted to get back to you regarding the one remaining issue on the ISDA Schedule. With respect to Section 7 - Transfer, we would like to keep the original language. We view the "credit rating" language as a one time exception which if we need to we can deal with separately, but any subsequent transfers after that we want to use the more generic language. Can we set up a call to discuss this and my other comments which I sent to you? Let me know some times this week that work for you. Thanks. carol

What is the subject?

OUT: Remaining Credit Issue
Here are the preliminary reports ready for your review. I have done a thorough analysis on Items 2 and 3 and feel very confident with the data. I will be finalizing my review of contract volume data in Item 1 no later than tomorrow and will advise if any changes are necessary. TK - Please update the daily rates for contract 27495 (Astra) and verify the rates in blue. Additionally, please verify that the discounted IT rates for contract 20248 and 22136 are correct as billed (it doesn't appear that these discounts appeared in the daily transactional report postings). I need all updates/comments no later than COB Monday, 10/29/01. Thanks,
Answer:
September 2001 FERC California Report - Preliminary Ready for Review