Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

One day when Jack was walking in the park, he saw a woman he knew sitting on a bench with a dog beside her. The dog was looking up at the woman. Jack walked up to the woman and said, "Hello, Sue, how are you? May I sit and talk with you for a while?" "Of course, please sit down," Sue said. Jack sat down next to Sue on the bench, and they talked quietly together. The dog continued to look up at Sue, as if waiting to be fed. "That's a nice dog," Jack said, pointing at the animal. "Yes, he's handsome. He's a bit of a mixture , but that's a bad thing. He's strong and healthy." "And hungry," Jack said. "He hasn't taken his eyes off you. He thinks you've got some food for him." "That's true," Sue said. "But I haven't." The two friends laughed and then Jack said, "Does your dog bite?" "No," Sue said. "He's never bitten anyone. He's always gentle and good-tempered ." Hearing this, Jack decided to _ the dog. He put out his hand and touched the animal's head. Immediately it jumped up and bit him. "Hey!" Jack shouted. "You said he didn't bite." "No, I didn't," Sue replied. "You asked if my dog bit, and I said no......"

1. Who was sitting on the bench?
2. What was with her?
3. What kind?
4. Who saw them?
5. What was he doing?
6. where?
7. Who does he think is handsome?
8. What was the dog doing?
9. Why?
10. Does she feed him?
11. Why not?
12. Why did Jack feel it was safe to pet the dog?
13. What does she say about his temperament?
14. What happened when he tried to pet it?
15. How many people had it previously bitten?
16. What did he think about the dog before it bit him?
17. Where was Jack sitting?
18. What were they doing?
19. What did he do when he saw Sue?
20. What did he say?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. Sue
2. a dog
3. mixture
4. Jack
5. walking
6. in the park
7. the dog
8. Looking up at Sue
9. Because he appeared to be waiting to be fed
10. No
11. She hasn't got any food for him
12. Because Sue says her dog has never bitten anyone
13. gentle and good-tempered
14. It bit him
15. unknown
16. That it was a nice dog
17. On the bench next to Sue
18. Talking quietly together
19. Walked up to her
20. "Hello, Sue, how are you? May I sit and talk with you for a while?"

Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

London (CNN) -- I remember well the shock when in 2000 Alex Rodriquez signed a 10 year, a quarter of a billion dollar deal ($252 million) to play baseball with the Texas Rangers.

It was beyond reality, and it didn't work out for the Rangers. He was later traded to the Yankees who happily increased the deal. Good for Rodriguez.

But at least he was being paid to work.

Rory McIlroy has now become Nike's poster boy -- certainly there will be a lot of strings attached; but he's not being paid by Nike to swing a club. He'll get millions more to do that.

Read more: Nike unveils Rory McIlroy: Tiger's heir apparent

Good for McIlroy. It's a better deal from Nike than Woods got.

His baseball cap now switches from Titleist to the Nike tick. TV ads have already been shot.

Now, I wonder which stable of Nike's sports stallions will he join?

Will he join Roger Federer and Michael Jordan at causing little or no offenses on or off the field of play?

Will he join Lance Armstrong and one day cause a massive scandal putting his Nike contract in jeopardy?

Or will he join the middle rank of bad boy athletes who's off the field scandals don't cost them their Nike deal; think Kobe Bryant or of course, Tiger Woods.

What's the difference? Lance Armstrong is accused of cheating his fans and his beloved sport and cashed in on that cheating. But remember, Nike actually stood by Armstrong for months in 2012, when all others headed for the exit.

1. Who signed a contract?
2. For how much?
3. For which team?
4. How long was it for?
5. Did he stay 10 years with them?
6. Why not?
7. Where did he end up playing?
8. Did he make good money with them?
9. Who is Rory McIlroy?
10. How much did he make?
11. How doe he relate to Tiger Woods?
12. Who else worked for Nike?
13. Was there anyone else that did?
14. What kind of problems did he cause?
15. Did anyone else cause problems for them?
16. Did they lose their contracts?
17. What else did Lance Armstrong do?
18. How did Nike react to that?
19. What did his other sponsors do?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. Alex Rodriquez
2. $252 million
3. Texas Rangers
4. 10 year
5. N0
6. It was beyond reality
7. Yankees
8. Yes
9. Nike's poster boy
10. millions
11. better
12. Roger Federer and Michael Jordan
13. Lance Armstrong
14. massive scandal
15. Kobe Bryant and Tiger Woods
16. No
17. cheating his fans and sport
18. Nike stood by Armstrong
19. headed for the exit

Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

English law is the common law legal system governing England and Wales, comprising criminal law and civil law.

English law has no formal codification: the essence of English common law is that it is made by judges sitting in courts applying statute, and legal precedent ("stare decisis") from previous cases. A decision of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, the highest civil appeal court of the United Kingdom, is binding on every other court.

Some rulings are derived from legislation; others, known as common law, are based on rulings of previous courts. For example, murder is a common law crime rather than one established by an Act of Parliament. Common law can be amended or repealed by Parliament; murder, for example, now carries a mandatory life sentence rather than the death penalty.

The first schedule of the Interpretation Act 1978, defines the following terms: "British Islands", "England", and "United Kingdom". The use of the term "British Isles" is virtually obsolete in statutes and, when it does appear, it is taken to be synonymous with "British Islands". For interpretation purposes, England includes a number of specified elements:

"Great Britain" means England, Wales, Scotland, their adjacent territorial waters and the islands of Orkney and Shetland, the Hebrides and, by virtue of the Island of Rockall Act 1972, Rockall. "United Kingdom" means Great Britain and Northern Ireland and their adjacent territorial waters, but not the Isle of Man, nor the Channel Islands, whose independent status was discussed in "Rover International Ltd. v Canon Film Sales Ltd." (1987) 1 WLR 1597 and "Chloride Industrial Batteries Ltd. v F. & W. Freight Ltd." (1989) 1 WLR 823. "British Islands"but not "British Isles"means the United Kingdom, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands.

1. Does English law have a formal codification?
2. Who makes it?
3. What is stare decisis?
4. Where does it come from?
5. Where else are ruling derived from?
6. What is the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom?
7. What act was passed in 1978
8. What is the punishment for murder?
9. What does the Interpretation Act 19787 define?
10. What does "Great Britain" mean
11. Are islands a part of that?
12. Which ones?
13. What act made Rockall a part of this?
14. What does United Kingdom mean?
15. Does that include Isle of Man?

Numbered answers:

A:
1. no
2. judges
3. legal precedent
4. from previous cases
5. from legislation
6. its highest civil appeal court of the United Kingdom
7. the Interpretation Act 1978
8. a mandatory life sentence
9. it defines the following terms: "British Islands", "England", and "United Kingdom"
10. "Great Britain" means England, Wales, Scotland
11. yes
12. the islands of Orkney and Shetland, the Hebrides and, by virtue of the Island of Rockall
13. Rockall Act 1972,
14. "United Kingdom" means Great Britain and Northern Ireland and their adjacent territorial waters
15. no