input question: So-called Houston! This one problem, Denise, or maybe Dennis, was repeating. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The announcer is likely to be a man."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Sher-Mandal, the octagonal tower due south of the mosque, served as the General's pleasure-palace, but it was to be the death of his rival and successor, Humayun .", can we conclude that "Before he passed, the General cursed his pleasure-palace."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: But admitting that people's happiness depends on their relative economic level as well as their absolute economic resources has some subversive implications.

Sentence B: Admitting people's happiness depends on their economic situation is subversive.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Schiff told the Star the story was absolutely not true.
Shiff spoke with a reporter.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Exhibits 12 and 13 present a summary of health effects benefits resulting from improvements in air quality between the Base Case and the Clear Skies Act scenarios.

Here is a hypothesis:
Exhibits 12 and 13 are pictures of mountains and hills.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
course uh course it it's the by word now i mean let let's tax everything three or four times

Does it follow that "I mean, it is just by the IRS's word now, but they always tax more."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell