Generate an explanation for the given claim using the provided supporting material from the paragraph. Please consider the following points while generating an output. 1) The claim will always have supporting proof in the paragraph, and the paragraph will have a clear point of view supporting the claim. 2) There can be instances where direct correlation to the claim is not available. Make use of the sentences in the paragraph to provide a corresponding output supporting the claim. 3) The explanation should be at least one and at most twelve sentences long.

Q: Paragraph: Strong point. The story said, "There's one other thing, the CDC says. Make sure patients understand that warding off HIV isn't cheap. Each pill currently costs around $36, which adds up to more than $13,000 a year. Some insurers might pay, but some might balk" The story stated the benefits clearly albeit only in relative risk reduction terms. We would have preferred absolute numbers. But it did such a good job in telling the updated story about proper use of the drug in question that we give it a satisfactory score. Several clear points were made about harms: The story did a great job of communicating the read-between-the-lines reality of the evidence for the use of this drug. NO disease-mongering here. The story is based on the CDC's evaluation and warnings about proper use of the drug. We would have liked to have seen a clinician-researcher's perspective someone not affiliated with the CDC analysis. Not applicable. Because of the nature of this drug, no comparison is really necessary. As the story stated, "It's the first time anybody's shown that taking a pill can prevent HIV and it was the first new weapon against HIV unveiled in many years." The story is clear that Truvada is already on the market. The story stated, "It's the first time anybody's shown that taking a pill can prevent HIV and it was the first new weapon against HIV unveiled in many years." We have no evidence that the story relied on a news release. Claim: CDC To Doctors: Anti-HIV Pill No Magic Bullet Against Virus

A: Clear, succinct, and important reporting that tones down some of the celebratory tone that greeted a drug's "landmark study" from a few months ago. The story notes that there was a lot of celebrating when news came out in November that taking a pill can reduce the risk of getting HIV. But the story delivered a clear dose of evidence and caution important journalism.
****
Q: Paragraph: The state Department of Environmental Protection is considering new regulations on how much toxins are allowed in the state's waterways. The Tampa Bay Times reports that environmentalists say the state should set numeric limits on the amount of toxins. However, the state agency believes the new limits should determine when and where to declare a public health emergency, not as a tool to try to prevent such emergencies. Florida had the worst blue-green algae bloom last year in the state's history. That was coupled with a devastating red tide outbreak along the state's beaches that caused respiratory irritations in people and killed sea turtles, manatees, dolphins and fish. ___ Information from: Tampa Bay Times (St. Petersburg, Fla.), http://www.tampabay.com. Claim: Environmentalists, state officials disagree on toxin limits.

A: Environmental activists and state environmental officials disagree about how regulations should be used to combat algae blooms in Florida's waterways.
****
Q: Paragraph: On May 18 2020, a photograph purportedly from a COVID-19 anti-lockdown protest began circulating, which showed a white woman holding a sign reading "muzzles are for dogs and slaves" alongside an illustration of a black woman wearing a mask or a face covering:Inside the mind of white conservatives. pic.twitter.com/wflisE1mUX Chad Loder (@chadloder) May 18, 2020In the above tweet, the woman is holding what appeared to be a box top with the image of the black woman on the left, and the "muzzles and slaves" verbiage on the right. The image was the first Google result for "slave mask," and it led to a Wikimedia Commons page featuring a woman who was called Escrava Anastacia ("Slavewoman Anastacia"):That same image was featured on the full page for Escrava Anastacia, who is an unofficial saint veneratedin Brazil:A slave woman of African descent, Anastacia is depicted as possessing incredible beauty, having piercing blue eyes and wearing an oppressive facemask. Although not officially recognized by the Catholic Church, Anastacia is still an important figure in popular Catholic devotion throughout Brazil. She is also venerated by members of the Umbanda and Spiritist traditions. She has also been portrayed in Brazil in books, radio programs and a highly successful television miniseries bearing her name.That page goes on to say that Escrava Anastacia lacks an official history, and that the details of her life story vary but in all versions, "she is enslaved and cruelly treated by her owners" and "Anastacia stoically bears these traumas and treats all people with love." According to that same Wikipedia page, she eventually died of tetanus:Eventually, she is punished by her owners by being forced to wear a muzzle-like facemask, which prevents her from speaking, and a heavy iron collar. The reasons given for this punishment vary: some stories report her aiding in the escape of other slaves, others claim she resisted the amorous advances of her master, and yet another places the blame on a mistress jealous of Anastacia's beauty. After a prolonged period of suffering, all the while performing more miracles of healing and peace, Anastacia dies of tetanus from the collar. It is often claimed that she healed the son of her master and mistress, and forgave their cruelty as she died.In a section about the hagiography of Anastacia, the page emphasizes her portrayal wearing a mask:While there are reports of black Brazilians venerating an image of a slave woman wearing a facemask throughout the late 19th and early 20th century, the first wide-scale veneration of the Saint began in 1968 when the curators of the Museum of the Negro, located in the annex of the Church of the Rosary of the Brotherhood of St. Benedict in Rio, erected an exhibition to honor the 80th anniversary of the abolition of slavery in Brazil. Among the displays was an engraving of a female slave wearing a punishment facemask. The image soon became the object of popular devotion and members of the Brotherhood began collecting Anastacia stories in the early 1970s.As for the sign, it was real and unaltered. It appeared on May 16 2020 in two separate images attached to a post on KymKemp.com, and at :03 in this video. A woman shown in one photograph was identified as Larkin Small, 37:Larkin Small said it was her first time ever coming to a demonstration and that this is what it took to get her out of her house at the age of 37.For the more widely circulating version of a woman in sunglasses holding the sign, a caption read:Gretha Stenger came out to stand with people who were deeply concerned about the Stay-at-Home orders and their repercussions.One of many comments on the post read:The sign that Larkin Small and Gretha Stenger are holding made me nauseous. Although I do not agree with the position of this protest, I do support the right of people to raise their voices for something they believe in, but the blatant ignorance and racism that the sign reflects is outrageous. Equating enslaved African American with dogs, and humans being chained and muzzled with a mandate to wear masksWTF?? ?The post itself covered a small May 15 2020 protest in Eureka, California, at the Humboldt County Courthouse. Some of the additional signs visible read:Pan-Demic caused entirely by Dem-PanicSocial-ISM DistancingCOVID-19 has a 99% survival rate. Why are we locked up?An image of a woman holding a sign reading "muzzles are for dogs and slaves" at a COVID-19 anti-lockdown rally in Eureka, California was one of many similar signs from weeks of astroturfed and inauthentically organized and promoted demonstrations that have gone viral. Previous iterations included one urging leaders to "sacrifice the weak," an anti-Semitic "the real plague" sign, Nazi imagery, and myriad iterations with poor spelling.Update, May 19 2020, 1:37 PM:Stenger, one of the women depicted, provided a statement to a local news outlet after her "muzzles are for dogs and slaves" sign went viral, and claimed she did not make the sign herself:"Holding that sign up at the lockdown protest was a grave mistake and I ask forgiveness from all those who I have caused pain. As I had no sign of my own, it was handed to me by another protester and a photographer took the picture before I considered the racist implications. My intent was to take a stand for the freedom of all human persons and I mistakenly held a sign that conveyed the opposite. Please know that I respect the dignity of all people and I sincerely regret any suffering it has caused."Stenger did not directly address several of the Times-Standard's questions about the ongoing stay-at-home order or the equivalencies drawn between that and slavery.The outlet was unable to reach Small for comment.Comments Claim: "A COVID-19 protester held a sign that said ""muzzles are for dogs and slaves,"" alongside an illustration of a masked woman of color."

A:
'Muzzles are for Dogs and Slaves' COVID-19 Protest Sign
****