Detailed Instructions: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. The four incorrect answers are other holding statements. You should find the correct option. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Problem:order granting Appellee Elliott's motion for pretrial diversion and we remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings on Kenton Circuit Court Indictment No. 99-CR-641. All concur. 1 . KRS 533.250 .262. 2 . KRS 533.250(1). 3 . Class D Felony Pretrial Diversion Rules for the Kenton Circuit Court (hereinafter "Kenton Circuit Court Pretrial Diversion Program"), III(C). 4 . KRS 533.250. 5 . KRS 533.252. 6 . KRS 533.254. 7 . Hyatt v. Commonwealth, Ky.App., 17 S.W.3d 121, 123 (2000). 8 . KRS 533.258(1). See also KRS 533.258(2) ("The defendant shall not be required to list this disposition on any application for employment, licensure, or otherwise unless required to do so by federal law."); KRS 533.258(3) ("Pretrial diversion records shall not be introduced as evidence 998) (<HOLDING>). 20 .See Thomas v. Commonwealth, Ky., 95
Holding statements: (A) holding that the appellant had an adequate remedy by appeal for his discovery violation allegations (B) holding that an appeal is properly dismissed as moot when an appellate court lacks power to provide an effective remedy for the appellant should it find in his favor (C) holding that the appropriate remedy for a public trial violation was a new suppression hearing not a new trial because the remedy should be appropriate to the violation (D) holding that a discovery exception to a statute of limitation applies only to the discovery of facts not discovery of the law (E) holding that the appellant waived his claim on appeal because he failed to address that claim in either his application for a coa or his brief on appeal
Solution:
(A)