In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: While they have pushed hard for open skies policies in Japan and Europe and lobbied hard against government antitrust intervention, they have been more than happy to use the legislative process to protect what amount to sinecures. Choices: 1. These policies are popular among the public. 2. Japan and Europe did not use the legislative process. 3. Japan and Europe have pushed for open skies policies.

Ex Output:
3

Ex Input:
Statement: This is a little too simple. Choices: 1. This is way more simplified. 2. This math problem is too easy. 3. This is as complex as it gets.

Ex Output:
1

Ex Input:
Statement: This would have been a good story for ABC News, if ABC hadn't been so busy being part of the problem. Choices: 1. This news network missed a story because they were part of the story. 2. If ABC news had not incited the terrorist, there would have been no story. 3. The news agency aired 24 hours straight of grass growing.

Ex Output:
1