Problem: Here is a premise:
Never before has a U.N. court been able to punish the actions of individuals . Both right- and left-wingers worry that the new U.N. tribunals will reprise the flaws of the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials, attempting to make political points and failing to adequately protect the rights of the accused.

Here is a hypothesis:
The UN court has always been able to punish the actions of people.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Below is a list of the hubs and the islands that can be reached by ferry from them within two hours.

Sentence 2: There is a list of hubs that can be reached by the ferry.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Gateway of India still describes the main function of Mumbai, known until 1995 as Bombay.

Does it follow that "Mumbai is still considered the Gateway of India."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If USA Snapshots and other regular graphs abound., can we say that "USA Snapshots and other regular graphs are plentiful."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"LSC requested that the planners seriously consider the advantages of having one LSC-funded program anchor each of the six regions identified in the plan."
Hypothesis: LSC didn't request anything of planners
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: huh well Raleigh just got a uh one of the new football teams the new World whatever it is World Football League or

Sentence 2: Raleigh just got a new football team.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes