Question:
Based on the premise "Harbaugh, foundation trustee and a colleague of Athens at the Conner and; Winters law firm, said his mentor had a special interest in people who could not afford legal services.", can we conclude that "Harbaugh said his mentor had a special interest in big corporations."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: and so they get her off and at the very end of the case after it's over he's talking with her and he figures out that she really did do it after all a uh after after he got after he got her off

Sentence B: He only learned that she was guilty after he had already gotten her off.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: No, sir, there was a bit of blotting paper over that part.
No, sir, there was some absorbent paper on top of that part.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
As in the new nationwide sulfur dioxide trading program, compliance with the requirement to hold allowances will thus be determined on a facility-wide basis.

Here is a hypothesis:
Sulfur dioxide is traded under a nationwide program.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: He belonged to men, who stubbornly pursued a goal, and could dedicate themselves to the quest wholly, regardless of the obstacles.

Sentence 2: The men have achieved many goals
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Therefore, once in place, internal control provides reasonable, not absolute, assurance of meeting agency objectives."
Hypothesis: Internal control also provides a platform for staff to voice their concerns.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell