Based on the information present in the given passage, you need to write a correct answer to the given question. A correct answer is one that correctly and completely answers the question. Do not write answers that address the question partially or incorrectly. The correct answer must be contained in the given paragraph.

Example Input: Paragraph- Sent 1: The day was just breaking, as I left the tower; though it was still too dark in the house to be able to see without a light, and I took one of the study candles with me on my 'round.
Sent 2: By the time I had finished the ground floor, the daylight was creeping in, wanly, through the barred windows.
Sent 3: My search had shown me nothing fresh.
Sent 4: Everything appeared to be in order, and I was on the point of extinguishing my candle, when the thought suggested itself to me to have another glance 'round the cellars.
Sent 5: I had not, if I remember rightly, been into them since my hasty search on the evening of the attack.
Sent 6: For, perhaps, the half of a minute, I hesitated.
Sent 7: I would have been very willing to forego the task--as, indeed, I am inclined to think any man well might--for of all the great, awe-inspiring rooms in this house, the cellars are the hugest and weirdest.
Sent 8: Great, gloomy caverns of places, unlit by any ray of daylight.
Sent 9: Yet, I would not shirk the work.
Sent 10: I felt that to do so would smack of sheer cowardice.
Sent 11: Besides, as I reassured myself, the cellars were really the most unlikely places in which to come across anything dangerous; considering that they can be entered, only through a heavy oaken door, the key of which, I carry always on my person.
Question: Why did he hesitate before going into the cellar?.
Example Output: It's huge and weird.

Example Input: Paragraph- Sent 1: Roberta Adams skipped the thick how-to guide on child-custody forms and sat down at a computer at the Lamoreaux Justice Center in Orange on Wednesday.
Sent 2: The Garden Grove woman answered a series of questions to create and print a form to file with the court.
Sent 3: "It's easy," said Adams, 25.
Sent 4: "I thought I'd have all kinds of questions and have to take the forms home."Sent 5: A University of California, Irvine, study released Wednesday found an interactive computer system effectively helps people fill out paperwork for restraining orders, eviction defense, small-claims cases and requests for filing-fee waivers.
Sent 6: Not only does the system make life easier for people who can't afford a lawyer, but it also might improve efficiency in the courts because the forms, which are printed out when completed, are easy to read and are being filled out correctly, the study found.
Sent 7: Since the program started in 2000, more than 6,000 people have used the free system, located in public buildings throughout Orange County.
Sent 8: The system was developed by the Legal Aid Society of Orange County with about $800,000 in grants.
Sent 9: The program avoids legal jargon, offers a courthouse video tour and sticks to a fifth-grade vocabulary.
Sent 10: Users can choose English, Spanish or Vietnamese.
Sent 11: Kiosks are in courthouses in Fullerton and Orange, the district attorney's family-support office, the Legal Aid Society in Santa Ana, Irvine City Hall and the San Juan Capistrano Library.
Sent 12: The program is also available online.
Sent 13: Bob Cohen, executive director of Legal Aid, said the study should clear the way for expansion throughout California.
Sent 14: Locally, a program for divorce petitions will be added this summer.
Sent 15: Cohen said the system proves the benefit of technology tailored to those who aren't computer-savvy.
Sent 16: He said much of the technology now available requires Internet skills and access.
Sent 17: Low-income people, however, have less access to computers and less experience using them.
Sent 18: "Our clients have to catch up, and they have to become a part of the mainstream," Cohen said.
Question: What forms can be filled out via the kiosk?.
Example Output: Eviction, restraining orders, child custody.

Example Input: Paragraph- Sent 1: Clarifying the Record The defense of U.S. airspace on 9/11 was not conducted in accord with preexisting training and protocols.
Sent 2: It was improvised by civilians who had never handled a hijacked aircraft that attempted to disappear, and by a military unprepared for the transformation of commercial aircraft into weapons of mass destruction.
Sent 3: As it turned out, the NEADS air defenders had nine minutes' notice on the first hijacked plane, no advance notice on the second, no advance notice on the third, and no advance notice on the fourth.
Sent 4: We do not believe that the true picture of that morning reflects discredit on the operational personnel at NEADS or FAA facilities.
Sent 5: NEADS commanders and officers actively sought out information, and made the best judgments they could on the basis of what they knew.
Sent 6: Individual FAA controllers, facility managers, and Command Center managers thought outside the box in recommending a nationwide alert, in ground-stopping local traffic, and, ultimately, in deciding to land all aircraft and executing that unprecedented order flawlessly.
Sent 7: More than the actual events, inaccurate government accounts of those events made it appear that the military was notified in time to respond to two of the hijackings, raising questions about the adequacy of the response.
Sent 8: Those accounts had the effect of deflecting questions about the military's capacity to obtain timely and accurate information from its own sources.
Sent 9: In addition, they overstated the FAA's ability to provide the military with timely and useful information that morning.
Sent 10: In public testimony before this Commission in May 2003, NORAD officials stated that at 9:16, NEADS received hijack notification of United 93 from the FAA.
Sent 11: This statement was incorrect.
Sent 12: There was no hijack to report at 9:16.
Sent 13: United 93 was proceeding normally at that time.
Sent 14: In this same public testimony, NORAD officials stated that at 9:24, NEADS received notification of the hijacking of American 77.
Sent 15: This statement was also incorrect.
Sent 16: The notice NEADS received at 9:24 was that American 11 had not hit the World Trade Center and was heading for Washington, D.C. In their testimony and in other public accounts, NORAD officials also stated that the Langley fighters were scrambled to respond to the notifications about American 77,178 United 93, or both.
Sent 17: These statements were incorrect as well.
Sent 18: The fighters were scrambled because of the report that American 11 was heading south, as is clear not just from taped conversations at NEADS but also from taped conversations at FAA centers; contemporaneous logs compiled at NEADS, Continental Region headquarters, and NORAD; and other records.
Question: Who needed to clarify the record of the U.S. defense of 9/11?.
Example Output:
The defense of U.S. airspace.