As a result of the latest meeting with PG&E over the greater than 500 ppm PCB liquids collection at the PGE Topock C/S filter separator (F/S), presented below is a summary of the deconning and sampling activity which occurred 6/29/00. Vector was instructed to use a high caustic detergent (Cimclean) as the cleaning agent for removing PCB's from the Topock F/S (50:50 Cimclean:water mixture). Diesel was not used in the deconning process. The only equipment cleaned by Vector was the PG&E F/S. Transwestern's filters in its separator were replaced, but no cleaning or deconning was perfromed to this unit. The filters were also replaced in the PG&E separator. The following samples were collected during this project: On the Transwestern side: 1. Wipes (3) of the interrior body of our filter separator after the filters were removed. Large areas were wiped to determine presence/absence of PCB's. (Not 100 sq. cm. sample) 2. A composite sample of a used filter removed from the upstream separator at the Selexol Plant. The filters appeared to be exceptionally clean 3. Composite sample of the fine powdery rust which had collected in the bottom of the F/S. Approximte volume one cup. 4. Composite sample of the used filters from the F/S. Visible appearance of the filters removed from this vessel showed them to be clean and virtually unstained. A small discoloration was present on the ends of each filter confirming that the filters were sealed properly in the F/S. 5. A sample of an unused clean stocked filter. This was a control sample. On the PG&E side: 1. A liquids sample of the residual in the upstream leg of the Topock filter separator prior to deconning. Approx. volume one cup 2. Sample of the solids (fine, blackened, powder) which had collected in the F/S. An estimate of the volume of this material removed form the F/S prior to deconning was approximately one gallon. 3. Wipe samples (3) of the interrior of the F/S prior to deconning (not 100 cm sq. wipe) 4. Used filter media from the F/S. The operation of the F/S filters are designed to be a twice pass through of the same filter. Composite samples were collected of the upstream and downstream portions of the filters. 5. Wipes (3) of the deconned filter separator interrior walls. The only inconsistency observed during the cleaning and inspection process was the volume and buildup of the black fine powdery hydrcarbon material which was present in the F/S at the Topock C/S and conspicuously small amount of rust colored material which was present in Transwestern's F/S . As previously mentioned, samples were collected of both materials. The only difference between the two locations was the color of the materials and the volume. It is suspected that the deconning activity conducted in August of 99 loosened hydrocarbon solids present in the 1850 feet of pipe which had over time moved and collected in the PG&E F/S. The small amount of rust materials observed in the Transwestern F/S is the result of the pigging activity from the Selexol Plant into the Transwestern F/S. I will have reprensentataive samples of both materials. Photographs were also taken of the cleaning and inspection activities and will be available for review at the forthcoming meeting in Flagstaff with PG&E. on the 13th of July. Analytical results will also be completed at this time.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Latest deconning Activity-Topock Lateral
It is with regret that I have to announce that Jeff Skilling is leaving Enron. Today, the Board of Directors accepted his resignation as President and CEO of Enron. Jeff is resigning for personal reasons and his decision is voluntary. I regret his decision, but I accept and understand it. I have worked closely with Jeff for more than 15 years, including 11 here at Enron, and have had few, if any, professional relationships that I value more. I am pleased to say that he has agreed to enter into a consulting arrangement with the company to advise me and the Board of Directors. Now it's time to look forward. With Jeff leaving, the Board has asked me to resume the responsibilities of President and CEO in addition to my role as Chairman of the Board. I have agreed. I want to assure you that I have never felt better about the prospects for the company. All of you know that our stock price has suffered substantially over the last few months. One of my top priorities will be to restore a significant amount of the stock value we have lost as soon as possible. Our performance has never been stronger; our business model has never been more robust; our growth has never been more certain; and most importantly, we have never had a better nor deeper pool of talent throughout the company. We have the finest organization in American business today. Together, we will make Enron the world's leading company. On Thursday at 10:00 a.m. Houston time, we will hold an all employee meeting at the Hyatt. We will broadcast the meeting to our employees around the world where technically available, and I look forward to seeing many of you there.
Answer: Organizational Announcement
Here is an email: Enron Net Works invites you to join Vice Presidents Brad Richter and Jay Webb for an info session about the largest B2B website - EnronOnline. Tuesday, October 30, 2001 at 12:00 p.m. ECN 5C2 Lunch will be provided. Seating is limited. RSVP via email to Jennifer Rosado by Thursday, October 25, 2001.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: EnronOnline - Info Lunch
Q: Krishna, We shall have meeting with Kim Watson on Thu at 10:00, 49 C2. It will be followed by a Video Conference with Nebraska at 11:30. Vince
Propose a subject line
A: Kim Watson
IN: Rick One question we are often asked is how do security and risk relate? Risk is the potential reduction in asset values from threats and vulnerabilities. Security is an ability you possess to protect specific assets in specific way(s). So the answer is: Security is able to reduce risk in specific areas but without the full breadth of risk defined it is impossible to determine how significant security solutions are. Stay Safe

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Security vs Risk
IN: This is an email
I received a call from a permit engineer with the Arizona Dept. of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) concerning the issue of notification of mechanical activities at C/S 2 Flagstaff and a mandatory 7 day wating period for agency review and approval. Due to the urgency of the C/S 2 work being performed, I had written a notification to the agency friday evening requesting approval to initiate the activities detailed in the scope of work which was included with the letter. On Monday, the engineer called and said that he had read the letter and had no problems with the activity proceeding at the C/S. After we had discussed this issue at some length, I posed the question to him of whether it was necessary to notify the agency of mechanical and maintenace activities which will not impact or change a combustion units throughput, fuel use, emissions, horsepower, or cause a change in design. After some discussions I informed him that Transwestern will probably inundate the agency with notification letters, he stated that as long as the engines operating parameters would not change, ( horsepower, emissions, throughput, fuel use etc), and the burden of responsibility will rest on Transwestern to ensure that no permit conditions are violated, he stated that we may proceed with these types of activities in Arizona without any notification to the agency. The only hitch being, that when Transwestern does a major mechanical activity, which would cost more than 25-30% of the cost of replacing a unit, that we provide them a courtesy notification. I told them we would apprise them of such an activity.....

What is the subject?

OUT:
ADEQ Requirement for Notification of Mechanical Activities