In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: The water is just fine, as is the air. Those that work in the oil industry drink the same water and breath the same air, as do their families. Don't fall for the hype by those who make money off the anti this and anti that crap. Lawyers will keep us safe, as those harmed by industries will sue the hell out of the alleged offenders. It's all good. Calm down. We don't need a colossal sized government with government officials that know nothing about the areas they regulate.
Obscene

Comment: The University, for whatever, reason decided to terminate Mr. Walls' contract. It was an amazingly "one-sided" document..ostensibly written for four years....but, with a "without cause" clause which allowed the University to terminate it with only one month's notice. The administration exercised that legal right and terminated Mr. Walls with no stated "cause".....that was perfectly legal...however "unfair" it might seem. On the other hand, perhaps they did have "cause" but chose to "take the easy way out" and not go through the hassle of proving any justification for his termination. They experienced considerable "blowback" because of their actions and, it seems, decided to "buy off" Mr. Walls for $90K...."here that this damn money and go away!" The whole fiasco reflects very badly on the administration...these guys make too much money to be so horribly incompetent...Gary Crum
Obscene

Comment: F***ing moron apparently.
Obscene