Here is an email: Hey, what's going on? I'm reading terrible things about Enron - is it affecting you? Let me know how you are and if you can meet for tea. G.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Checking In
Q: Greg, Condolences for the turbulent times Enron is going through. We remain excited and optimistic about the possibilities of a joint project. We realize that you and Vince may have limited bandwidth in the immediate future, but when you have time we hope you will consider the draft proposal we sent Vince. We are still fully behind it. Yours truly, Norman
Propose a subject line
A: Enron and Prediction Company
IN: I visited with Joseph Kaye last evening. He is now in a private room, and is healing as fast as he can. He is able to sit up by himself, and can walk the hall with assistance. His remarkable recovery is, no doubt, due to his equally remarkable attitude. His left arm is in a cast, and he is in a lot of pain from the fractures to his face and the back of his skull. It's difficult for him to eat because of the discomfort remaining from the intubation which had kept him alive immediately following the accident. In spite of all the above, he looks toward his full recovery and wanted me to tell you that he knows he is alive because of your prayers. He was proudly wearing an MS150 "finish" pin on his hospital gown which Pat Bertotti took to him, and was thrilled with the "finish" cap from Team Enron. When I asked what he'd like to tell the team, he asked me to send you his love and his appreciation for your prayers. He also asked that you always remember how precious life is, how precious our basic life functions are that we sometimes take for granted.....He shared with me that his Pedal Partner, Tim Hart, had come to visit him at the hospital to thank him for the effort he made to ride and raise money for MS. Joseph knows that the pain and struggle he has now will be gone in time, but that his Pedal Partner has year after year to deal with the circumstances of managing his life with MS. Joseph purchased, just before the tour, a great pair of sunglasses with prescription lenses. They were totaled in the crash, and I thought it would be a good idea for the team to replace those glasses for him. If you'd like to donate to this, please send your checks to me. It wouldn't take much from each rider, and what we have left, we can donate to MS in Joseph's honor, since I'm sure he'll not be in any shape to collect his pledges before deadline, and I know he is concerned about the pledges he had promised. He is very devoted to this cause. Make your checks payable to Enron Cycling Club and send to address below. (Please make sure if you are also sending a get-well card to Joseph to put your check in a separate envelope, as I do not open the correspondence you send to him.) All riders donating to the glasses will have their names included on the presentation. We have sent him a floral arrangmeent from the team for delivery today. He enjoyed the mail you have sent, and if you have any more cards and letters please send to: Amelia Alder, Enron Corp., P.O. Box 1188, Suite 3AC3120, Houston, TX 77251-1188 If you'd like to email him, please send to me and I will print out and deliver.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: GREETINGS FROM JOSEPH
IN: This is an email
Tanya: There's no short answer with these people! I think we are fine with their setoff language (part A only) because the NDP always has the option to permit setoff to other agreements between the parties as to amounts payable by the Payee to the Payer (where the Payer owes money under the ISDA to the Payee). So here's my recommendation: (1) Call your friend Andre and hear what he has to say. He has some kind of suggestion about Part (B) and limiting the NDP's payment to the DP to be based upon satisfaction that "nondisputed" amounts having been paid by the DP. Will he also raise the "other agreements" issue here? Not a clue. (2) If Cargill leaves part A in tact and we agree to change part B, I'M FINE. (I'm fine without part B, actually) (3) The potential problem is that Cargill and ENA view part A differently, right off the bat. I think Cargill is wrong because they don't read part A as applying to "other agreements between the parties". But Cargill proposed part A and it DOES apply to "other agreememts between the parties." I don't want to start off on the wrong foot so I'm sure I'll have to discuss this again with Marty. Thanks for your continued help. Sara

What is the subject?

OUT: Cargill, Incorporated - the final SETOFF discussion
QUESTION: Attached is the draft presentation of the internal controls component of the audit. We are only planning on including the first 4 of 8 pages. The last 4 pages were built anticipating Andersen being involved and are included here for reference only. Page 4 is the RAC component. Thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Internal Controls presentation
IN: Kathy, My recollection is the costs to us were roughly: Scenario 1 $55m 2 week for service 2 weeks for $10k in pay Min 8 weeks max 52 Scenario 2 $45m 1.5 weeks 1.5 weeks Min 8 max 39 Scenario 3 $35m Dynegy 2 weeks Min 13 weeks max 52 I've pitched the following compromise to Dynegy this morning: 2 weeks for service 2 weeks for every $10k of salary capped at $100k Min 13 weeks max 52 weeks. Can you run numbers and correct above if I'm way off. Thanks

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
Severance