Sentence 1: After saying we learn nothing from current Darwinian theorizing about any darkness in human nature, he continues, At the very most, biology might help us to delimit the environmental circumstances that tend to elicit one behavior rather than the other.

Sentence 2: Darwinian theories are the best learning tool for learned behaviors from environmental factors.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
A real liar wouldn't tell you that he's a liar as Wolff does, would he?

Does it follow that "Wolff admits he is a liar."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If Also keep an eye out for pilgrims who prostrate themselves repeatedly as they circle the stupa., can we say that "Some pilgrims will throw themselves down again and again as they're circling the stupa. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"They are classified as (a) offsetting receipts (i.e."
Hypothesis: They are not considered (b) offsetting receipts
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: 3. Elitism. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Society with no leaders."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Q: If My guess is they ain't sure., can we say that "My guess is they ain't sure who there dad is."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
it is not possible to tell