Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

OK. But I calls 'em as I sees 'em, and I gave three examples supporting my conclusion. Could have provided several more (as I mentioned). But I don't expect everyone to agree with me on every point.

My main goal is to expose--and STOP--the arrogant, irresponsible "animal welfare" simpletons who value PET lives over environmental stability, species-level wildlife extinctions and indeed the lives of their fellow human beings.

As for the rabbits, I must respectfully decline, despite the fact my one remaining cat would probably really enjoy their company. My daughter loves rabbits and raised them for years when she was younger, but no longer has the time or energy to care for one dealing with three kids (ages 16, 4 and 2).

As for me, was difficult enough to get my land-person to accept renters with a cat, and even more difficult to get her to agree to a second one--a "rescue" I brought home from Sand Pt in 2004. But thanks anyway.
No

Arun makes a number of good points and offers a perspective that undermines the demagogues of the right. The right loves simple easy answers to complex problems. They miss their responsibility for creating the conditions that make for a rich soup of angry people who don't see any way out. Of course we all know that the Iraqi war was the worst response, particular how the first six months were handled. Bush's team was arrogant. Blackwater was arrogant. Debathification was stupid, and arrogant. They left stock piles of bombs around Bagdad that slowly dissolved to become IEDs. And throughout this the words of support for Islam were undermined by the radical right. And it's gotten worse, much worse as Fox and team rally their troops to undermine considered actions that could both reduce the hatred and tension and increase our ability to deal with extremists on both ends...great insights!
Yes

Patricia Blair: Instead of coming across as an insensitive hater, try tapping into the Aloha Spirit & have some empathy.

Public servants, especially on the Congressional level are saturated with many problems, cares & concerns. I would venture to say that it is quite a demanding job, especially for those who serve from Hawaii, having to travel all the way to D.C.

Mark Takai made a promise to his constituents & to the State of Hawaii to serve his term. He is keeping his promise. Many politicians who get voted into office, find a better opportunity, bails out of the office BEFORE their term ends. Then the public is outraged, for lack of commitment.

So, even in the face of a life threatening illness. Mark could step down, but then we the taxpayers would have to foot the bill for the special election!

Furthermore, what specific votes did Mark miss? We're those votes crucial for Hawaii? How many votes that had something to do with Hawaii did Mark miss?

HAMAU! (Peace be still!) Aloha!
No