QUESTION: We have a spreadsheet showing old 2002 plan that everyone agreed to a few months ago before all the fun started. We have EA, EGM, EIM, EEL, EBS, EES, ENW, Corp., CommodityLogic, and Other broken out by EnronOnline, Operations, IT development and IT infrastructure which is further broken down by expense and capital and totals (we separated out depreciation as well so we could see what was cash and non-cash). We are currently trying to put together the adjusted or new 2002 Plan along side the above numbers based on the estimates from the last week or so and will try to be done late tonight. Thanks.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Quick Update
Attached are the results of the Balancing Test evaluation performed on October 25, 2001. According to may paperwork, I should send the results back to Steve Olin but I cannot contact him therefore, I am contacting you with the results. I regret to inform you that Enron has unsuccessfully completed Balancing Test evaluation. Results are attached. <<ENRON_ bal_10_25_01_evaluation_v2_fail.xls>> - ENRON_ bal_10_25_01_evaluation_v2_fail.xls
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Enron Balancint Test Documentation
Earlier this year, I negotiated this agreement with GS&C. I cannot locate the agreement so GS&C is sending a copy. The Enron party is ENA. We now need to amend the authorized trader list which I will email to you. ENA's use of GS&C's platform is for trading US treasuries, agencies, money market, corporates, JGB's. We need to: (1) remove Harry Arora (who was the sole authorized trader) (2) add the following: Darren Delage Shane Dallmann Ellen Su Pushkar Shahi Gary Hickerson THIS IS A VERY HIGH PRIORITY FOR GARY AND WE SHOULD TRY TO COMPLETE TODAY.
Answer: Goldman, Sachs & Co. - Electronic Trading Agreement
Here is an email: Per discussions with Steve Harris we have re-estimated volumes and costs for a smaller version of Project Red Rock. We have studied two scenarios and the results are as follows. 70 mmcf/d Case Requires PGT-25 compressor installation at TW Stations No.1 and No.2. Estimated cost = $48,000,000 120 mmcf/d Case Requires PGT-25 Compressor installation at TW Stations No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3. Estimated cost = $72,000,000. GE has informed us that absent a substantial commitment from Enron by June 13, they will be forced to stop all work on the 4 PGT-25 compressor packages for Project Red Rock. If we elect to restart this work at a later date, the original delivery dates (Nov-Dec 2001) will not be feasible. We have proposed to GE that Enron make an irrevocable commitment for 2 or 3 PGT-25 Compressors by June 13, and GE continue to preserve the original delivery dates for the uncommitted balance. They have indicated that this will be an acceptable arrangement through the end of June. With no further commitment from Enron for the balance of the original order by June 30, GE would stop all work on the uncommitted portion of the order. This would preserve our required In-Service date for 150 mmcf/d through the end of June, and of course, would preserve the required In-Service date for a reduced Project Red Rock. If, by the end of June we have not committed to the balance of the compressor order, I believe that we may be able to scale back the purchase of the uncommitted PGT-25 Compressors packages. The PGT-25 Compressor package consists of a Gas Generator (LM 2500) and a skid mounted Gas Compressor/Power Turbine. The reason for long manufacturing lead-time is the Gas Compressor/Power Turbine. We may be able to purchase the PGT-25 Compressor package without an LM-2500 Gas Generator. LM-2500 Gas Generators are much easier to come by on short notice. The cost of the Gas Compressor/Power Turbine, without an LM 2500 Gas Generator, is about $4,000,000. The cost of the LM 2500 Gas Generator is about $5,500,000. We have not discussed this with GE at this time but I believe it is feasible to preserve project delivery options. We are preparing a communication to send to GE affirming our election to make an irrevocable commitment on some portion of the original order. We will release that communication to GE next week if you wish to proceed on either of these alternatives. I will not be in the office this coming Monday but Jerry will be available to followup.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Project Red Rock Update and Alternatives
Q: This warning is sent automatically to inform you that your mailbox is approaching the maximum size limit. Your mailbox size is currently 91384 KB. Mailbox size limits: When your mailbox reaches 75000 KB you will receive this message.To check the size of your mailbox: Right-click the mailbox (Outlook Today), Select Properties and click the Folder Size button. This method can be used on individual folders as well. To make more space available, delete any items that are no longer needed such as Sent Items and Journal entries. You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed. To turn Journaling off, click Tools | Options | Journaling Options and de-select all items. See client Help for more information.
Propose a subject line
A: WARNING: Your mailbox is approaching the size limit
Here is an email: Attached is our updated forecast. Note that for Monday the largest proposed distribution is for California Gas through the end of the month. That decision is currently being evaluated by the business with a final decision on Monday. A minimum of $250,000 for Ca. gas will be required. Please have the cash committee approve the entire balance of the month contingent on business sign-off. Thanks
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
Update 12/14/2001