TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government.
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Why should we have to pay to help idiots
use illegal dope. Let them die. That or bring
in Durete. He has what it takes to stop this crap.

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: When you have an organization which says "Black Lives Matter" whenever police shootings are involved, how can the fact of the race of the dead person not be relevant enough to put in a headline?

Especially in a State where only 2.3% of the population is black and most of that population is in Portland?

Not mentioning the race of the alleged victim could be construed as white censorship.

As in: "We don't want people to know that white cops are killing black kids!"

Pick your headline and justify it.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene