Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
Yes, we do know the timeframe from the stories provided. He had lots of time to get in his truck if he's telling the truth. 4-5 barks=10+ seconds.

I like your fantasy about a family's loyal labrador becoming a vicious killing machine in the space of a few seconds, about to rip off the face of a child, heroically dispatched by a Hollywood producer who generously moved to Alaska to become a co pilot for a regional airline and who was so afraid of the animal in question that he parked his vehicle in its yard and walked his toddler over to it. A man so responsible that he keeps guns in the house with four toddlers and apparently posts nude pictures of the kids on social media. yes this man is certainly a worthy subject for our admiration.

For the rest of us who have survived decades on earth without having to carry guns around to protect us from the shadows we jump at, the mentality required to feel that you need a concealed weapon on a day to day basis is really incomprehensible.

Ex Output:
Yes

Ex Input:
"Unaffiliated voters for the most part tossed their ballots in the trash or the recycling bin, the data show."

I don't think the data even address how voters disposed of their ballots. Perhaps they burned them or used them as birdcage liner. Perhaps they are saving them for another election day, hoping to get in the last word. Maybe Lucy Vinis was just excited to see her name in print and she autographed and framed several copies for her friends.

The tally was heavily buoyed, by the way.

Ex Output:
No

Ex Input:
The pps plan is to move access to humbolt in 2017 (there is currently no other building solution for it), leaving humbolt empty for a year. Kairos is in desperate need of a new space and petitioned the board to lease it for that year.

Ex Output:
No