In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: So, the much vaunted TRUMPCARE has now become the DUMPCARE.

That's one for Obama :)

Output: Non-threat

Input: Consider Input: Comment: I find those who chant do so because they either have such a slim argument that they don't want to be drawn into it, or because they lack the mental prowess to mount their argument in a rational manner. It is for that reason that the "Lock her up," chant is offensive.

I should point out too that the main perpetrators of the chanting phenomenon are unionists, "Hey, Hey Ho, Ho. Fill-in-the-blank has got to go!" Clever eh? The "progressives" particularly the enviro-nuts, are no better, "U.G.L.Y. Corporate scum you cheat you lie. You UGLY, uh, uh, you UGLY." That intellectual gem and many others are found on the website tarsandsblockade.org

Chanting has no place in rational debate, none.

Output: Non-threat

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Not a bad call, because the Devil is in the details (as usual). There are consequences to hasty decisions, and no battle plan survives contact with the enemy. I side with Trump, because one thing that is necessary to an effective military is the psychological stability of the people wearing the uniform. In my case, I required close scrutiny because I was to be one who launched nuclear weapons. Remember Chelsea Manning? Crypto troop, special clearances and a psychological basket case. He released vast amounts of classified material because of his homosexual/tranny leanings. If he made the Army "stronger", then I'm a cracked teapot with a giraffe for my mom. Who wants to give a Secret clearance to somebody who can't even decide what gender he is? Might as well enlist depressed and./or bipolars and give them access to sensitive material. And the Navy needs lookouts, so why not recruit the blind for those positions? What could go wrong?
Output: Non-threat