In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: No kidding... not once did he call someone a fat slob or mock a handicapped person. How dare he. Maybe he will grab someone by the p*ssy to redeem himself.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: This article is somewhere between deceptive and fraudulent.
1)The first step in suing the state or any other entity is the FILING of the COMPLAINT and SERVING the defendant the COMPLAINT. The state says they have not been served the complaint. Therefore at this time no complaint has been filed.
The truth is, at best, is that the plaintiff is PREPARING to sue the state and I hardly find this to be any way news worthy! Seriously WTF?
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: To all of you who have decided that you're informed enough to judge this boy, let me clear up a few things for you. The weapons charge was due to a hand gun that was still on the seat of his car after he had been target shooting, that had inadvertently had a coat pushed onto it. The knives were a variety of hunting knives that were seized in an ILLEGAL search by the police. Shockingly, people do have legitimate reasons for having weapons and it should not be assumed that all are criminals. His sentence was a minimal fine, community service and a gun safety class. As far as the current charge, surely you've heard of college kids who get drunk and have consensual sex? Once upon a time, girls had to own their bad decisions but now they have Title IX on campuses which allows those who regret having sex while drunk to claim they were raped. REGRET SEX IS NOT RAPE and I suggest you read www.esquire.com/news-politics/a33751/occidental-justice-case if you actually want to be informed.
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit