Detailed Instructions: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Problem:fairly and reasonably compensate Grace C. Chantos for her damages, if any, that resulted from such breach of contract? Consider the following elements of damages, if any, and none other: The amount Grace C. Chantos would have received for the sale of her 502 shares of the business corporation if H. Frank Faucette and J. Lawrence Scha-dler had not breached the Sale and Purchase Agreement. At the charge conference, Faucette's and Schadler's only objection to this question was that the answers should have been separate for each of them. They did not complain that the instruction's measure of damages was improper or otherwise object to the instruction. Therefore, we measure the sufficiency of the evidence against the language in the charge. Osterberg v. Peca, 12 S.W.3d 31, 55 (Tex.2000) (<HOLDING>); Kroger Co. v. Brown, 267 S.W.3d 320, 323
Holding statements: (A) holding when no objection is made to jury issue sufficiency of the evidence is measured against charge given by court rather than some other unidentified law (B) holding that sufficiency of the evidence is measured against a hypothetically correct jury charge (C) holding that sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction is not measured by the jury charge actually given but rather measured by the elements of the offense as defined by a hypothetically correct charge (D) holding that direct and circumstantial evidence are to be given the same weight when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence (E) holding that summary judgment is appropriate when no issue of material fact exists and the court is reviewing administrative record for sufficiency of evidence
Solution:
holding that sufficiency of the evidence is measured against a hypothetically correct jury charge