In this task, you are given product reviews about dvds. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive(the reviewer is satisfied) or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative(the reviewer is not satisfied).

Input: Consider Input: Relive Childhood Memories . WWE produces good quality documentary DVDs (I can't always say the same about their raunchy live shows). This is another well-made, interesting, and entertaining WWE DVD. It brought back lots of memories for me. A lot of the 80s gimmicks seem corny and overly tame by today's standards, but they seemed pretty dumb to me at the time, too, and I was just a kid. One sort of sad thing is to see Bobby Heenan's commentary. He doesn't sound or look anything like he used to. He appears gaunt and withdrawn and slurs his words. He says with a touch of sadness in his voice that he misses the days of going out there and entertaining the fans (realizing, I'm sure, that he will never again be a personality on any wrestling programming)

Output: POS

Input: Consider Input: pretty good Fantasey! . To tell you the truth i had never read the book before because the libary always has other holds on it but i went ahead and wacthed this movie with my sister and younger brother we were hoping we would enjoy it despit bad reveiws, so it turns out we liked it, my sister said it's seem's more of a remake of lord of the rings (as everyone else does ) the dragon was wonerfully done we liked the fact that it had a mind of it's own. Ed Spellers did better than i thought for a newcomer, i always enjoy Jeremy irons (exepct for the really bad D&D)the only miscast really was John Malvoich as the evil king i just think he didn't fit well, overall a pretty good fantasy not a classic but good enough for me.( it's my 3rd favariet dragon movie besides dragonheart and dragonslayer i highly recommend those)

Output: POS

Input: Consider Input: Bizarre and ridiculous rip-off; a drug-induced nightmare put to film . How the film-makers achieved financing to make this film I'll never understand. The make-up, costuming, screen-writing, directing, acting, cinematography, editing are all over-the-top and way over-done. It looks like an amateur film-school project. Nicole Kidman is beautiful--the one bright spot in this film. For some reason, a film set in the late 19th century had the male lead and entire cast break out singing "The Sound of Music" by Rodgers and Hammerstein. Someone must have been smoking something illegal that lead to this manic, ridiculous parody? of a musical. Nowhere did I read a review that said it was a parody and farce; it was supposed to be a musical. There was no way I could view this film for more than 15 minutes, and that long just to see if the title character would awake from a drug-induced nightmare. I love musicals but this one should definitely be viewed free on television and not rented or bought until you see if you can stand it. Save your money--it is awful. Note: If I had read a review such as this, I would have saved myself time and money
Output: NEG