In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: "The Rasmuson Foundation's analysis found that a plan like Walker's, which also would have reduced the dividend to around $1,000, was sharply regressive, even with the income tax." Sorry, that is ludicrous. I can't really believe the Rasmuson Foundation believes that? What a bunch of nonsense. The use of the word "regressive" by the socialists is getting out of hand. Last stand for them I guess as the cold reality of the law and fundamental free-enterprise principles are honored.
Non-sexual-explicit