The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
--------
Question: Context: 'Looking forward to this camping trip! I am hoping we can find something amicable with these additional resources.' 'I'm excited too 🙂. Things have been stressful lately. What are some things that you value most?' 'It's supposed to be chilly where we are heading and I could really use some extra firewood. 🙂 What about you?'
Utterance: 'I really need food and firewood. Could you do 3 firewood and 3 food packages? My son has a problem with poor sugar levels which cause him to convulse when cold and doesn't eat enough food.'

Answer: Yes

Question: Context: 'Same here haha. Is water your lowest priority item too?' 'Yes. We think we have enough water for now.' 'Same here! I am in need of food more than firewood however as I am very hungry. '
Utterance: 'Me too. We have a bigger family and we will run out of food if we don't get some more.'

Answer: Yes

Question: Context: 'But these are only additional packages☹️' 'I get that and understand completely. I have a large number of mouths to feed making the food a necessity or all the firewood to cook whatever we hunt. How many you have?' 'I have three.'
Utterance: 'I have 8. That is 5 more people to feed for 3 meals per day....'

Answer:
Yes