[QUESTION] Premise: "Skiiers on snow cappedhills."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Skiiers are doing jumping jacks." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Skiers skiing on snow capped hills cannot be doing jumping jacks.
The answer is no.

Q: Can we conclude from "A person in brown and two older cars in front of a white building." that "Two motorcycles are parked behind the building."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Cars are not the same as motorcycles as being behind the building is not the same as being in front of the building.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A tropical fisherman throws an orange net into a river." is it true that "A fisherman is fishing."?

Let's solve it slowly: A fisherman throws an orange net into a river must be fishing.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A wooly dog on a beach looks toward another dog in the water."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A wooly dog looks at another dog." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A wooly dog looks at another dog may be in water.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "A laughing child is holding a water gun and getting sprayed with water." is it true that "A girl gets sprayed by her brother with the hose."?
A: A child getting sprayed with water does not imply that the person spraying her is her brother or that the object used to do the spraying is a hose.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A small bird sits in a person's hand and eats seeds." that "The bird is soaring high through the sky."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Sitting and soaring are mutually exclusive actions. The bird cannot be both in a hand (close to the ground and an enclosed space) and in the sky (above the ground and an open space).
The answer is no.