In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Milo is an openly gay man purports to be a Catholic and does part of his hate routine in drag. The Cardinal Newman Foundation should have itself in vapors if such a character comes to a Catholic university. Milo might corrupt the students and turn them gay.
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Keep parroting the line, Neff. You and your Liberal friends have no political power anymore. Just violence and name calling.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: This was a racist article against Eastman; cause he wouldn't kiss their
butt and it should be a bill for ALL, who worked on the project. What about
Orientals, or Mexicans? Why does ONE GROUP want recognition, but
not all? So, they can later claim that blacks built the highway and not
others?
[EX A]:
Identity-attack