Teacher: In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Reason: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

Now, solve this instance: SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Lower Rio Grande Valley Water
Resources Conservation and Improvement Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES UNDER THE
LOWER RIO GRANDE WATER CONSERVATION AND IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.

(a) Additional Projects.--Section 4(a) of the Lower Rio Grande
Valley Water Resources Conservation and Improvement Act of 2000 (Public
Law 106-576; 114 Stat. 3067) is amended by adding at the end the
following:
''(20) In Cameron County, Texas, Bayview Irrigation
District No. 11, water conservation and improvement projects as
identified in the March 3, 2004, engineering report by NRS
Consulting Engineers at a cost of $1,425,219.
''(21) In the Cameron County, Texas, the Brownsville
Irrigation District, water conservation and improvement
projects as identified in the February 11, 2004 engineering
report by NRS Consulting Engineers at a cost of $722,100.
''(22) In the Cameron County, Texas Harlingen Irrigation
District No. 1, water conservation and improvement projects as
identified in the March, 2004, engineering report by Axiom-
Blair Engineering at a cost of $4,173,950.
''(23) In the Cameron County, Texas, Cameron County
Irrigation District No. 2, water conservation and improvement
projects as identified in the February 11, 2004 engineering
report by NRS Consulting Engineers at a cost of $8,269,576.
''(24) Braden, Inc. at a cost of $5,607,300.
''(25) In the Cameron County, Texas, Adams Gardens
Irrigation District No. 19, water conservation and improvement
projects as identified in the March, 2004 engineering report by
Axiom-Blair Engineering at a cost of $2,500,000.
''(26) In the Hidalgo and Cameron Counties, Texas, the
Hidalgo and Cameron Counties Irrigation District No. 9, water
conservation and improvement projects as identified by the
February 11 engineering report by NRS Consulting Engineers at a
cost of $8,929,152.
''(27) In the Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, Texas, Delta
Lake Irrigation District, water conservation and improvement
projects as identified in the March, 2004 engineering report by
Axiom-Blair Engineering at a cost of $8,000,000.
''(28) In the Hidalgo County, Texas, Hidalgo County
Irrigation District No. 2, a water conservation and improvement
project identified in the engineering reports attached to a
letter dated February 11, 2004, from the district's general
manager, at a cost of $5,312,475.
''(29) In the Hidalgo County, Texas, Hidalgo County
Irrigation District No. 1, water conservation and improvement
projects identified in an engineering report dated March 5,
2004 by Melden and Hunt, Inc. at a cost of $5,595,018.
''(30) In the Hidalgo County, Texas, Hidalgo County
Irrigation District No. 6, water conservation and improvement
projects as identified in the March, 2004, engineering report
by Axiom-Blair Engineering at a cost of $3,450,000.
''(31) In the Hidalgo County, Texas Santa Cruz Irrigation
District No. 15, water conservation and improvement projects as
identified in an engineering report dated March 5, 2004 by
Melden and Hunt at a cost of $4,609,000.
''(32) In the Hidalgo County, Texas, Engelman Irrigation
District, water conservation and improvement projects as
identified in an engineering report dated March 5, 2004 by
Melden and Hunt, Inc. at a cost of $2,251,480.
''(33) In the Hidalgo County, Texas, Valley Acres Water
District, water conservation and improvement projects as
identified in an engineering report dated March, 2004 by Axiom-
Blair Engineering at a cost of $500,000.
''(34) In the Hudspeth County, Texas, Hudspeth County
Conservation and Reclamation District No. 1, water conservation
and improvement projects as identified in the March, 2004,
engineering report by Axiom-Blair Engineering at a cost of
$1,500,000.
''(35) In the El Paso County, Texas, El Paso County Water
Improvement District No. 1, water conservation and improvement
projects as identified in the March, 2004, engineering report
by Axiom-Blair Engineering at a cost of $10,500,000.
''(36) In the Hidalgo County, Texas, Donna Irrigation
District, water conservation and improvement projects
identified in an engineering report dated March 22, 2004 by
Melden and Hunt, Inc. at a cost of $2,500,000.
''(37) In the Hidalgo County, Texas, Hidalgo County
Irrigation District No. 16, water conservation and improvement
projects identified in an engineering report dated March 22,
2004 by Melden and Hunt, Inc. at a cost of $2,800,000.
''(38) The United Irrigation District of Hidalgo County
water conservation and improvement projects as identified in a
March 2004 engineering report by Sigler Winston, Greenwood and
Associates at a cost of $6,067,021.''.
(b) Inclusion of Activities to Conserve Water or Improve Supply;
Transfers Among Projects.--Section 4 of such Act (Public Law 106-576;
114 Stat. 3067) is further amended by redesignating subsection (c) as
subsection (e), and by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
''(c) Inclusion of Activities to Conserve Water or Improve
Supply.--In addition to the activities identified in the engineering
reports referred to in subsection (a), each project that the Secretary
conducts or participates in under subsection (a) may include any of the
following:
''(1) The replacement of irrigation canals and lateral
canals with buried pipelines.
''(2) The impervious lining of irrigation canals and
lateral canals.
''(3) Installation of water level, flow measurement, pump
control, and telemetry systems.
''(4) The renovation and replacement of pumping plants.
''(5) Other activities that will result in the conservation
of water or an improved supply of water.
''(d) Transfers Among Projects.--Of amounts made available for a
project referred to in any of paragraphs (20) through (38) of
subsection (a), the Secretary may transfer and use for another such
project up to 10 percent.''.

SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR LOWER RIO GRANDE
CONSTRUCTION.

Section 4(e) of the Lower Rio Grande Valley Water Resources
Conservation and Improvement Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-576; 114 Stat.
3067), as redesignated by section 2(b) of this Act, is further amended
by inserting before the period the following: ''for projects referred
to in paragraphs (1) through (19) of subsection (a), and $42,356,145
(2004 dollars) for projects referred to in paragraphs (20) through (38)
of subsection (a)''.
Student:
Lower Rio Grande Valley Water Resources Conservation and Improvement Act of 2004 - Amends the Lower Rio Grande Valley Water Resources Conservation and Improvement Act of 2000 to authorize specified additional projects, including projects for water conservation and improvement in Cameron, Hidalgo, Willacy, Hudspeth, and El Paso counties, Texas.

Permits each project that the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, conducts or participates in to include: (1) the replacement of irrigation canals and lateral canals with buried pipelines; (2) the impervious lining of irrigation canals and lateral canals; (3) the installation of water level, flow measurement, pump control, and telemetry systems; (4) the renovation and replacement of pumping plants; and (5) other activities that will result in water conservation or an improved water supply. Authorizes the Secretary to transfer and use for another such project up to ten percent of amounts made available for a project.

Reauthorizes appropriations for Lower Rio Grande construction.