IN: Can we use credited service date for sev calc? I have a person who was hired in 1997, left in 1999 and was rehired in April 2001. The system is using a 1998 service date for severance. I calculated in on the 2001 re hire date.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Severance
IN: This is an email
Attached is the latest skew file that is being used to value options in the system. Each of you should be able to use this file to download the information from the system. Please try to by pressing the fetch data button. You do not have the ability to save the data in the system. Please call me at (713) 853-6247 if you have any problems. Thanks. John Griffith

What is the subject?

OUT: Skew File
QUESTION: The letter looks good. A couple of comments for your consideration: On page three we describe the change to the definition of Public Utility and then argue that we don't fit into it. Would it be worth explaining why that makes sense? Specifically, the New Jersey restructuring law, like most efforts of its kind in other markets, is designed to separate the competitive from monopoly elements of the power (and gas) businesses. Economic regulation would then be restricted to the remaining monopoly elements of the business (eg distribution). The competitive market can not be solely relied upon to "regulate" the behavior of monopoly asset owners, such as distribution utilities. Therefore, regulators continue to be called upon to set pricing and other terms of service. What those regulators decide matters a great deal to those monopoly utilities and it consequently makes sense for lawmakers to be concerned about attempts by such entities to use campaign contributions to tacitly influence decision makers. The same public policies simply do not apply to that portion of the market which is competitive. The generation and sales business has a competitive structure (i.e. relatively low barriers to entry, multiple competitors etc.). These components of the power and gas business can be "regulated" by the market with respect to rates and terms of service. They do not require economic regulation any more than grocery stores, department stores, appliance sellers or other "retailers" (who presumably are not prohibited from making contributions. Competition and markets discipline behavior and establish competitive prices and terms of service. Because regulators don't set the prices and terms of service for such sellers, there is no reason to be concerned about campaign contribuitions from such organizations. Indeed, the legislation, and the legislative history, clearly conform to this underlying policy rationale. As a former practicing lawyer, I certainly understand the value of pleading in the alternative. But, I question how certain of our arguments woud be perceived by the public if they ever came to light (which these documents have a habit of doing).. . I can just see the press seizing on Enron's claim of "ignorance or mistake" or the fact that we pled for the favorable exercise of "prosecutorial discretion". I suggest that we add whatever we feel is necessary to the very solid looking intent argument, not make specific reference to "ignorance or mistake", and not plead for the favorable esxercise of PD. If we feel we need to write about this last item, perhaps we could suggest that it would be a waste of the public's resources to pursue a claim under such circumstances.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: AG letter - privileged and confidential: request for legal advice.
Attached is a clean CSA, only change is to date as of today. Attached are a clean and relined MNA for final review. Troy, I will call after 1 to get your final approval and coordinate execution of the documents.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Enron Master Netting
Hi: I heard back that many of you have been unable to open the original solicitation letter I sent to you because of the links involved with the mail merge. So, I removed the links and am resending it to you in hopes that it works this time. I have gotten requests from many of you to resend letters via fax, etc. to various businesses. I am more than happy to do that for you. Unless you tell me otherwise, in the interest of time, I am signing your names to those letters and faxing them. However, if you want to use the attached letter on your own, feel free. Thanks,
Answer: Solicitation Letter
Q: Dear all, Attached is the final copy of the speaking points for the CEO Diversity Roundtable. Thank you for your immediate and quick response. ay
Propose a subject line
A:
CEO Diversity Rountable Speaking Points for Ken Lay