Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

It states that we should not negotiate any further liberalization of trade or investment at the Seattle meeting of the WTO or the free trade area of the Americas without first securing enforceable international rules on core labour standards, environmental protection, cultural diversity, the preservation of public health care and public education.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: The liberalization of certain policies will be to the benefit of the Americas.
****
Answer:
It's impossible to say
[Q]: New suit<br>Yesterday I bought my husband a new suit. When he saw it he was absolutely pleased. He immediately tried it on. The suit fit perfectly. However to my dismay he spilled some wine on it. I brought a new suit yesterday because my husband spilled wine on his suit. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]: No
Problem: In The Toronto Star, the story is that, before the offending letter was sent off to Swiss authorities, it went back and forth several times between Staff Sergeant Fiegenwald and the Justice Department lawyer Kimberly Prost, each time resulting in the Justice Department toughening the language.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The language was the same all throughout"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: No
Q: he is not asserting himself in serbian politics
And unfortunately now he is trying to reassert himself in Serbian politics. Already just today the members of his political party said that they were going to ignore the orders of the new president of Serbia, and that they question his legitimacy, and he's still going to try to be actively involved.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: No
British mountaineer Alison Hargreaves becomes the first woman to climb Mount Everest alone and without oxygen tanks.
She did it in the summer OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: It's impossible to say
Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

In other words, in order to make sure we're secure, there must be a comprehensive plan. My opponent just this weekend talked about how terrorism could be reduced to a nuisance, comparing it to prostitution, illegal gambling. I think that attitude and that point of view is dangerous. I don't think you can secure America for the long run if you don't have a comprehensive view as to how to defeat these people.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: The person thinks the opponent's point of view is dangerous
****
Answer:
Yes