In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: One thing for sure - it's going to be extremely funny watching the BC NDP suck and blow at the same time on this one.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: While I agree with the basics of your thought (the Legislature failed us), to think the chief thief would not have vetoed the PFD is foolishness. That man wants our PFD, and nothing will stop him. The Legislature could have hacked the budget with a light saber, and Walker would have still capped our PFD.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: I wonder if anyone will dare to ask Singh, who portrays himself as a devoted Sikh, how he can be devoted to Sikhism and yet support the NDP's pro abortion and pro-gay rights agendas. Sikhism is very clear that abortion is only to be considered in extreme circumstances like a threat to the life of the mother. And Sikhism's spiritual leader has declared homosexuality to be wicked and sinful.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit