In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: north korea 3 atomic bombs 9 million people usa 7000 350 The usa has to find a small country to bomb the shit out of to make itself feel good no mater that kim dum dum is an idiot

Answer: Obscene

Question: Comment: None of you know Zane so keep your damn mouths shut

Answer: Obscene

Question: Comment: If we have intercommunion with Protestants, should we be concerned that they don't have nor claim to have or believe in Apostolic Succession? Do we still believe in that? If not, than why should a Catholic priest remain celibate when he could equally be a married Methodist minister? Why be Catholic if the Eucharist is valid in any church? Why bother with a Pope?
There are implication to allowing even limited intercommunion. Would the Catholic be receiving the true Body and Blood of the Lord from a Lutheran minister not ordained in Apostolic Succession?
We need to think these things out and not react simply from feelings.
God bless.

Answer:
Non-obscene