Sentence 1: Layering additional requirements, such as the outdated power plants provision, on top of a cap and trade program is very likely to increase costs without providing significant environmental benefits.

Sentence 2: Layering more requirements and cap and trade is likely to raise costs.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Blanka and Edmundo inhaled books by the truckload and even that was not enough.

Does it follow that "Blanka and Edmundo read a lot."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If and they're able to do that through all the manipulations of the computer, can we say that "They can manipulate it on the computer."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
" Feast of St. Francis; Franciscan Mysteries"
Hypothesis: Feast of St. Francis: Franciscan Mysteries
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: (The return crossing, however, is never as bad. ) If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The return crossing isn't nearly as bad."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Q: If The real outrage is that boxing is barbaric., can we say that "Boxing has been losing viewers because it's barbaric."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
it is not possible to tell