Problem: Here is a premise:
But isn't there some point at which the media's choice of topic can become so controversial and so determinative of the course of the campaign that the principle of self-disclosure supersedes the principle of modesty?

Here is a hypothesis:
The media's choice of topic raised a lot of eyebrows amongst the voters.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: The city was now under the more tolerant rule of the Persians, but rebuilding was slow work.

Sentence 2: The city was never ruled by the Persians.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
I found I didn't want to do that and realized an interest in psychology.

Does it follow that "I realized I had an interest in maths."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If so that so then that she that was when she got moved from the first one to the second one where she was given penicillin, can we say that "They gave her penicillin in the second one."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"Nijo Castle is a poignant monument to the ironic twists of history."
Hypothesis: The Nijo Castle was built in 1503.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Tuesday night, Scheck himself was billed as a guest, but he never appeared.

Sentence 2: Scheck attended as planned on Tuesday night.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no