Question: Sentence A: You'll enjoy visiting Le Vauclin, a consummate fishing village with more than its share of friendly, weatherbeaten people.

Sentence B: You will enjoy the fresh seafood fair in Le Vauclin.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Israel gained total control of Palestine, including Jerusalem, Gaza, and the West Bank, as well as Egypt's Sinai and Syria's Golan Heights.
Israel lost all control.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
In a chapel in the left transept, the wooden Crucifixion by Donatello (1425) is in affecting naturalistic contrast to the Renaissance idealism of the time.

Here is a hypothesis:
The wooden Crucifixion by Donatello (1425) is stark contrast to ideals of the Renaissance of the time.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: oh that's kind of neat

Sentence 2: That new design is kind of neat.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
why did he make you do it

Does it follow that "Do you know why he made you eat the entire bowl by yourself?"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "f) All of the above.", can we conclude that "Everything mentioned is correct."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes