Mark spoke to Bloomberg and their attorney with Wilkie Farr, and they made substantial revisions to the form. I just faxed a clean and blacklined draft to them and am waiting to get their approval. Will you be around to sign?
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: UPDATE - Bloomberg
I have not heard back from DAPSA with respect to the Consent to Service of Process. Can your business contact there give them a call? Thanks.
Answer: DAPSA
Here is an email: In February, 539,594 Mmbtu were allocated to the our index purchase from HPLR Liquids at King Ranch. This allocation resulted in a large physical unaccounted for loss. Effectively, the gas was being purchased twice in our systems. In addition, a sale to the Liquids group, which should have been zero, was brokered with a purchase from Swift (2500 Mmbtu/day), resluting in additional gas being allocated to the HPLR Liquids purchase contract. I have attached a schedule detailing the volumes that were double booked in February. This schedule also reports the daily volumes for March which will need to be adjusted. I have calculated (based on estimates) that we should have only purchased about 88,000 from the Liquids group at King Ranch for February. See the following: Booked to HPLR Liquids: 539,574 18,606/day Purch by HPLC @ WH: 379,108 13,073/day Incorrect Liquids Sale: 72,500 2,500/day Adjusted purch from Liquids: 87,986 3,034/day We usually input a purchase of 2,500 Mmbtu/day from HPLR Liquids at the tailgate. We can increase this to 3,000/day for March. The majority of gas in the 3-Rivers system is transported to the King Ranch plant through HGPL. Some of this gas is purchased at the wellhead by HPLC, some of the gas is purchased at the wellhead by HPLR Liquids, and three producers have the option to either sell their gas to HPLC at the wellhead or to process their gas and sell the residue to HPLC at the tailgate of the plant. It is very important to keep the meters and volumes allocated correctly among parties related to these transactions. The attached schedule should assist in doing this. I have reported the meters at which HPLC buys wellhead gas. The movement of this gas through HGPL and King Ranch should be kept seperate from the gas purchased by the Liquids group. A transport usage ticket can be used to show the transfer of HPLC's gas from King Ranch to HPL. Let's plan on discussing this either Friday or Monday afternoon. Let me know what works best for you. D
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: 3-rivers / King Ranch / HPLR Liquids
Q: Hey there Mr. Real Time. Looks like you did a deal with Pacificorp on 11/28 - EPMI STCA buys 8 MW @ $60 for hour 2. These eight silly little megawatts have unbalanced our book and driven the schedulers to near insanity. No, just kidding. But I think there should be a sale of 8 MW from Nevada to Mead on hour 2 somewhere in there. I don't know - I'm not the expert, which is why I'm asking you. Will you please let Lisa Gang or me know how to fix this. I'm more than happy to do it, just wanted to double check with the man who created the mess in the first place. (Kidding again.) Kate
Propose a subject line
A: STCA Net Position Discrepancy 11/28
IN: Hi Monika, It was great to see you at our annual conference. I hope that you had a good time and enjoyed the services we provided. Let's keep in touch and let me know if I can provide any help for you in the future. Best,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Good to see you
IN: This is an email
Please plan to attend the Quarterly Managing Director Meeting scheduled for Monday, October 22. An agenda will be distributed at the meeting. Meeting details are as follows: Monday, October 22 8:30 - Noon Hyatt Regency Dogwood Room (located on the 3rd floor) A video connection will be made from the London office. Please call if you have any questions. Joannie 3-1769

What is the subject?

OUT:
Quarterly Managing Director Meeting - Monday, October 22