Here is an email: Hello Everyone, Well, this week was no doubt a tough week for us all picking the winners. Approximately 10 of the NFL games were won by the underdogs this week. Many people missed the Pittsburgh/Tampa Bay game, also the Carolina/Washington game, Baltimore/Cleveland, New England/Indy game; Atlanta/New Orleans, Denver/San Diego and Green Bay/Minnesota game. Back on Thursday, Buffalo was only picked by one person over Jacksonville. In the college games, just about everyone missed the North Carolina/Clemson game, while the Wisconsin/Illinois and USC/Notre Dame games were missed by about half the people. Through all that, Larry Campbell is the current leader with only 7 wrong, while George Phillips is the only other person still in contention with 8 wrong. Larry picked the Giants tonight with 39 total pts, while George picked the Eagles with 32 total points. Therefore, if the Giants win, Larry will win outright, if the Eagles win and there is 36 or more total pts, then Larry will also win. George will win with a Philly victory and 35 or fewer total points scored. There were 31 entries this week, therefore the prize is $62. There is another Thursday night NFL game this week, therefore we will make this week's picks due Thursday afternoon. I did have a few requests for making each entry $3 this week, to increase the money you could win. Therefore, please email me back if you would like to see the entry fee at $3 instead of $2. If we get more than 20 people who would not mind a $1 increase in the entry fee for a bigger prize, then we will go with it. I do not want to go more than $3 for now. Therefore, if we can keep the 30-35 people each week, the prize will be closer to $100, instead of $60-70 dollars. This is not my idea to have some people give up more money, but just a suggestion I got from a few people. Below are the number of games missed by each person this week. Andy Larry Campbell 7 George Phillips 8 Carter Ellis 8 Joe Brewer 9 Daniel Muschar 9 Andy Pace 9 Rob Benson 10 Valerie Ramsower 10 Daniel Jenkins 10 Ashish Mahajan 10 Miguel Garcia 11 Diana Allen 11 Thomas Lowell 11 Rick Broussard 11 Gautam Gupta 11 Kayne Coulter 11 Robert Vargas 12 Larry Jester 12 Mike Grubbs 12 Gerald Gilbert 12 Bryce Schneider 12 Todd DeCook 12 Dean Laurent 12 Joe Quenet 12 Steve Pan 12 Reagan Mathews 12 Joe Step 13 Jaime Gualy 13 Joe Capasso 13 Pat Hanse 14 Ryan Williams 14
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: results of football pool
Q: This is the estimated PJM Trans Loss Charges for Nove business as of the 17th. Any questions or concerns, please let me know. - Marci x3-0577
Propose a subject line
A: PJM Trans Losses - 11/2001
IN: Hi Steve, I wanted to send this to you before I send it out to others, since I feel like there were changes we had discussed that somehow didn't make in the last draft. Guess you can say this is a sanity check! If it looks good to you, then I will send it out, unless you prefer to make distribution. Kay

Generate a subject line.

OUT: NJN LOI
IN: This is an email
Hey Sam, that has to be one of the "cheeriest" cards I've ever received. Please thank Leica for her birthday wishes (and how is the old girl doing?). Do you remember my 39th at Andrea's with Pat and Dee (I think) and Ron and his wife (I've forgotten her name but I remember what she looks like)? I remember your 40th with Beverly and Helen and the walker (you probably remember the stripper). I need your MAILING address so that Phoebe, Chloe and I can send you a holiday card. Are you a bi-city resident? Do you still own Corky's? Do you have a different venture(s)? How is Mr. Casey? How are Helen and Beverly? Do you see them often? Do you love Atlanta? You know that at my age (it's actually been any my ages) I write in stream of consciousness. I hope this makes sense. Sara P.S. Ain't life grand?

What is the subject?

OUT: You'd better not squeal!
QUESTION: Attached please find referenced list. The only amended counterparty with a change was Murphy Exploration which was shut down for power. I wonder, when we are working with amended counterparties, if there is some way that my prior approval could be on the recent spread sheet? Right now I have to go find the old spread sheet to find out what I approved it for last time to see if I have any problem with the change. So usually, unless I have - change next to amended, it means I had no change to what I said before. Does that make sens?
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Counterparty Approval List for 1/28/00
IN: Anne, We would like to know the P&L for trading California gas this year for physical only. Please run a report summarizing the P&L at Socal Topock, PG&E Topock, Socal Ehrenberg, Ca Production, PG&E Topock, Malin, etc. We will then need to notify John Lavorado of the results. Thanks,

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
CA Report