We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
--------
Question: Sent1: Let's see what they get, when REAL trouble happens, and they have to stop everything, and try to load the gun!
Sent2: If people are going to carry guns for protection, they should be encouraged to put lots and lots of rounds through the gun.

Answer: Not similar

Question: Sent1: where gun control laws prohibit good law abiding citizens from carrying a gun to protect themselves and others.
Sent2: Law abiding citizens are not going to misuse their firearms and those with criminal records are already banned from owning guns.

Answer: Not similar

Question: Sent1: In addition to ORGANIZING the militia, and while congress has the power to ARM the militia, they have no responsibility to do so, and they have NEVER provided personal weapons.
Sent2: The pre-existing right to keep and bear arms was premised on the commonplace assumption that individuals would use them for these private purposes, in addition to whatever militia service they would be obligated to perform for the state.

Answer:
Not similar