Write an article based on this "Check the bar width. Check the bar slope. Check the bar flare. Check the gullet."
article: Remember when you checked your horse's withers and topline? This is when that comes in handy. Place the saddle on your horse without a saddle pad/blanket. If it fits, the bars should be in contact with the horse down the entire length of their back. If the bars touch only the base of the horse's back but not the top, then the saddle is too narrow. If the bars touch only the top of the horse's back but not the bottom, then the saddle is too wide. The slope of the bar is the angle of the rocker against the angle of the horse's back. A well-fitting saddle will have bars that mimic the angle of the topline. Therefore, the bars will be in contact along the entire strip of the horse's back. If the bars touch only the withers and the croup, then 'bridging' will occur and cause sores on the horse. This happens if the bars are too long, or if there isn't a large enough slope to match the sway of the horse's back. If the bars contact the center of the horse's back only, then rocking will occur. This happens if the bars are too short or if the slope of the bars is too great to mimic the horse's back. The angle at which the bars turn upwards/outwards at the front at back of the saddle is the bar flare. If there is little to no bar flare evident, then the saddle may be too small for your horse. Make sure that your saddle has evident bar flare to prevent it from digging into your horse's back while riding, causing sores or chafing. Place the saddle on your horse without a blanket or saddle pad. Look at gullet from the croup of the horse; you should be able to see all the way through to the withers. If you cannot, then the saddle is too small. Then, go to the gullet by the withers and place as many fingers as you can vertically in the empty space. A well-fitting saddle will allow for 2-2.5 fingers to stack in the gullet; more than that means your saddle is too large, while less means that the saddle is too small.

Write an article based on this "Make a rough outline. Decide how much detail you want. Select a design."
article: Start by creating a visual of your structure, beginning with the largest parts of the organization first, such as the main departments. You could also start with the main managers, if you're using an employee-based chart. The point of this exercise is to establish a visual of what your chart needs to look like and how much information you'll want to include. For instance, in a large organization, including every employee is probably not feasible. Even including every sub-department may not be feasible. Make a decision about the amount of detail you're going to include. One way to design an organizational chart is like a family tree. You have the CEO in a box at the top. Underneath that, you have lines coming out to the next major departments or managers, also enclosed in boxes. This design works especially well for a hierarchical company. On the other hand, a thought-bubble type design might work better in a less hierarchical company. If you have three equal departments with no CEO, you could connect all three departments in the design, with each department spreading out from a middle square or bubble with the name of the company in it.

Write an article based on this "Think about the goal of your presentation. Know your audience's background to help you structure your presentation. Select your main points based on the length of your presentation. Find your best-supporting information."
article:
You should always begin with the end in mind when it comes to planning a presentation. Think about what you're trying to convey, and the best means to do so in the time you have. Write down your most important points. See if you notice a key point emerging. If your audience were to take away one thing from this presentation, what would it be? Don't just bombard your audience with facts. Think about what these facts do for your audience. What's the point you're trying to make with the information? If your topic isn't common knowledge, then you'll need to include that information in your presentation and ensure that you have enough time for it. You should also consider what your audience expects from the presentation. For example: Are you trying to sell them a product, introduce them to a new idea, alter their way of thinking? Think about the kind of people in your audience. Do you have a tougher crowd, or do you have a group of enthusiastic people excited about what you're going to say? Ask yourself what statements, facts, and points best illustrate the theme of your presentation. A 10-minute presentation, for example, should include no more than 3 points. You should also consider the way the points relate to one another, and be prepared to discuss them in a logical, cohesive fashion. Not all points will relate to one another. For example, if you're talking to a company about recycling program, you might discuss how corporate pollution contributes to global warming and how recycling can help the company save money. You wouldn't discuss the melting ice caps as a key point. Melting ice caps are a valid concern, but they are a fact or a supporting point. Comb through the research you are presenting. Look for your most solid supporting information. This should be the information that will really get the audience thinking, and can inspire change. Supporting information should do three things: Add clarity to your argument by explaining anything the audience may not understand. For example: a brief overview of pollution's effect on climate change. Add authority by making connections with existing research, studies, and information. For example, you could mention the consensus in the scientific community that global warming is manmade and cite a few studies. Add color to your argument through visuals, like pictures and videos. For instance, you could show a chart of the amount of waste an average corporation produces in one month.