Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Excellent piece. People don't realize that it is ultimately the consumer who is pinched by these so-called business-only taxes; they are more or less pass-thru charges that hurt businesses (impairing their ability to compete with companies not exposed to the same taxes), workers (when costs of being in business go up, companies lay off workers), and consumers who pay higher prices for the same stuff as they did before. Enough is enough. Perhaps the hostile tax environment may be part of the reason that the economy is so services oriented in Oregon. A lot of the Fortune 500 companies have left. The problem with such a services-oriented economy is that it is not very flexible. So, when economic downturns come around every 8 years, or so, the Oregon and other services-oriented economies (e.g. Arizona) is hit harder than the national average; a lot of the money used to pay for those services is sourced from discretionary income. In recessions, people have less discretionary consumption.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: You're right, it could. However, I'd still have more control as an end user.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Andi, Markie as you refer to him obviously rolled into politics off of a political silver spoon. And Andi I am seriously saddened that after they lost Nick in the ice fields mom hooked up with a guy gyping rich women. But Mark's really bad politics was gyping every woman in Anchorage and then Alaska. He grew government locally more than any Mayor to now. Because his back story may not be pretty (I don't wish that on any child) that doesn't mean we should have to live with leadership and politics that is not pretty.
[EX A]:
No