TASK DEFINITION: Craft one correct answer to the question given in input. To make it more interesting, try to use non-stereotypical language if possible. Make sure your correct answer is reasonably long, consistent with the context, and requires common sense (instead of explicit extraction from the context.) In your answer, use as few words as possible from the given context. Use a response that is uncommon/non-stereotypical, so that it is less predictable. To be less repetitive, please vary your language for each question.
PROBLEM: Context: There 's always at least one kid with a backpack or book bag of enormous proportions ; more often than not the voluminous vessel is coupled with an individual that has the tendency to barrel down the hallway , oblivious to the fact that with each step he is sending human projectiles left and right and that pandemonium has ensued . With all of the other adjustments that come with middle school , one takes it in a stride and catches on quickly that stepping into a doorway is a fine idea when the dark - blue L.L. Bean Deluxe Book Pack ( only 39 $ ! ).
Question: Why may one get hurt in the school hallway ?

SOLUTION: There is a kid with a dangerous backpack .

PROBLEM: Context: Opening her apartment door , she found herself taking in the sight of a slender , blonde - haired , blue - eyed beauty queen type with a hard sneer for a mouth . " I ' m here , " she said as she pushed past Eden and made her into her apartment uninvited . She stood in the middle of the modest one bedroom and wrinkled up her pert little nose , and turned back to Eden who was now closing the door behind them . " Wow , this is some crappy dump they put you in ! " " I happen to like it , " Eden told her coolly as she moved over to the kitchenette and offered her guest a drink .
Question: Why was Eden 's response to the woman cool ?

SOLUTION: Because the woman was behaving rudely .

PROBLEM: Context: The article is a miserable hack - job . Todd Purdum does n't even pretend to prove anything , but uses the anti - Clinton mystique to let his readers make broad leaps from innocuous trips in planes with rich guys to ... oh , you know , do n't you ? Clinton was right - anyone who would write such a piece of crap - to say nothing of the editors who published it - is a " scumbag " .
Question: Why does the writer believe that the author of the article is a hack job ?

SOLUTION:
Because he believes he is accusing Clinton of things without proof .