In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and you have to write an answerable question based on the context. Your questions can be extractive, abstractive, or yes-no questions.

Q: We employ a huge dataset of 45,000 self-reported depressed users introduced in BIBREF46 where a lexicon of depression symptoms consisting of 1500 depression-indicative terms was created with the help of psychologist clinician and employed for collecting self-declared depressed individual's profiles. A subset of 8,770 users (24 million time-stamped tweets) containing 3981 depressed and 4789 control users (that do not show any depressive behavior) were verified by two human judges BIBREF46 .

A: How is the data annotated?
****
Q: Dataset Quality Analysis ::: Inter-Annotator Agreement (IAA)
To estimate dataset consistency across different annotations, we measure F1 using our UA metric with 5 generators per predicate. Dataset Quality Analysis ::: Dataset Assessment and Comparison
We assess both our gold standard set and the recent Dense set against an integrated expert annotated sample of 100 predicates. Dataset Quality Analysis ::: Agreement with PropBank Data
It is illuminating to observe the agreement between QA-SRL and PropBank (CoNLL-2009) annotations BIBREF7.

A: How was quality measured?
****
Q: The results indicate that most performance gains come from words embeddings, style, and morality features. Other features (emotion and sentiment) show lower importance: nevertheless, they still improve the overall system performance (on average 0.35% Macro-F$_1$ improvement)

A:
Based on this paper, what is the more predictive set of features to detect fake news?
****