Premise:
"In a statement, Sawyer said she played no role in this decision."
Hypothesis: Sawyer never gave a statement.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: The Supplementary Information accompanying the final rule states that the final rule was not analyzed under Executive Order No. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The Supplementary Information accompanying the final rule was inferred from the public"?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "In the center is the most ancient monument in Paris, the 23-m- (75-ft-) tall pink-granite Obelisk of Luxor from the temple of Ramses II, dating back to 1300 b.c.", can we conclude that "The Obelisk of Luxor is over three thousand years old."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Earthquake, fire, flood, and the plunder of barbarians and Renaissance architects reduced the area to a muddy cow pasture until the excavations of the 19th century.

Sentence B: The area never declined from it's peak state of completion.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Me "Hercule Poirot!"
Poirot is weak, in body and mind.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
The ones that were killed in the crib would have turned neo-Clintonism into a full-scale self-parody.

Here is a hypothesis:
Babies that got killed in their crib would turn the idea into a self-parody.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes