In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Ex Input:
apparantly money talks .
. .
and uses quite a bit of obscenities doing so !
i 've always considered myself pretty open about the gratuity a film can possess , whether in language , violence , sex , or what have you .
i find that this fact gives me a little more leverage to complain when a movie goes overboard , and money talks definitely does !
it 's not so much that the movie swore nearly constantly ( and i mean constantly ! ) , but it swore so much that it seemed overly prominent and way too staged .
perhaps if one character were foul mouthed , but in this film , everybody swears nearly every other word .
money talks is about a black ticket scalper named franklin hatchett ( played less annoyingly than expected by chris tucker ) .
franklin is your typical con - man and ends up with more than one person out to get him .
when the plot finally gets underway , there 's no less than three people ( or groups ) that want him , dead or alive .
the frenchman who 's somewhat responsible for franklin 's escape from a prisoner - packed bus , a hoodlum whom franklin owes seven grand , and the cops who wrongly suspect him of murder .
franklin 's only hope : james russell ( charlie sheen ) , an investigative reporter for the local news who 's out to prove himself a worthy journalist .
james offers to help clear franklin 's name if franklin will just allow him an exclusive report to help channel 12 conquer sweeps week .
both of these elements are completely lost along the way however , and never do reappear .
as expected , the odd couple of franklin and james do wind up friends at the end , which is another wasted element seeing as how they show no signs of becoming friends at any point along the way .
there is just nothing original or intriguing about this film , and so many developments are either non - relevant , or just plain forgotten about . money talks is a paint - by - numbers movie that lacks any real involvment with the audience . frivilous dialogue , a predictable , flat storyline , and two - dimensional characters make money talks a reason to save your money .

Ex Output:
N

Ex Input:
you always have to be careful with the first official studio release out of the gate each year .
they 're obviously films for which the studios have no great hopes ( having missed both the deadline for academy award eligibility and the big box - office holiday season ) .
combine that with howie long 's first starring action role , and
you 've got a doozy of a movie
that , while not as bad as it could have been , is n't a very good film .
howie stars as an ace smokejumper ( a firefighter who parachutes into forest fires unreachable from the ground ) .
in the slightly contrived opening scenes , we witness his heroism in action , as he , and his mentor ( played by scott glenn ) attempt to rescue a small girl and her dog from an oncoming forest fire .
william forsythe plays the bad guy , a mass murderer who has several million dollars tucked away to help fund his jailbreak .
he ( and five convict cohorts ) manages to get selected for firefighting duty when a woodland blaze just happens to ignite nearby .
his escape plan bets a lot on the laxity of the guards , but ( since there must be a movie )
luck is with him .
soon the now - escaped convicts are masquerading as canadian firefighters .
why canadian ? who knows , eh ? along the way they pick up a pretty birdwatcher ( suzy amis ) to be their hostage .
enter howie long .
he 's called in to help fight the blaze , and when he spots the group of " ground pounders " , apparently lost , he parachutes in to help .
when he discovers their true identity , he is the only thing standing between them and escape , and the only hope of help for the hostage .
long 's acting talents are above those of , say , steven seagal , but not by much .
although his delivery is mostly flat and wooden
, he 's a likeable hero , and there are some hints here and there that he may get better .
the script does n't help him out any , however .
all too often , it veers into the realm of the unintentionally funny .
the dialogue is strictly b - movie material , and the plotting relies too heavily on coincidences to be believable .
long 's co - stars are a mixed bag .
at least they 're all comfortable in their respective roles .
forsythe has the scenery - chewing villain down cold , down cold , and scott glenn is always enjoyable to watch , even when he does n't seem to be stretching his talents ( as is definitely the case here ) .
suzy amis plays peril pretty well , but is n't given much more to do .
some of the nature and wildfire shots are interesting , but many are rather bland .
you 'd think that the director , dean semler , a former cinematographer , would at least produce a film with interesting visuals .
that 's not the case .
there 's a lack of originality to nearly all the sequences .
. .
we 've seen this stuff before .
it 's not the most auspicious start to 1998 , but it could have been worse ( just think back to 1996 's debut , bio - dome ) .
however , after a month of oscar - caliber pictures , a movie like firestorm at least gives you some perspective on how good those movies really were .
in fact , there 's a good chance that some of them are still playing near you . . .

Ex Output:
N

Ex Input:
movies like six days , seven nights make me mad because talented people like harrison ford , anne heche , and ivan reitman put a lot of hard work in to a script worth about ten cents .
?
the script was written by michael browning , and he decided that , instead of thinking up new ideas , he 'd rehash a lot of cliches , omit even the slightest bit of character development , and then throw in drug - dealing pirates to provide for a few high - level action sequences and explosions . ?
there are good scripts out there that high - profile actors can make ( see the truman show , for instance ) . ?
six days
, seven nights is simply a waste .
let 's see .
.. we have to get harrison ford and anne heche alone on an island . ?
so , how do we do that ? ?
well , we 'll make her a feisty magazine editor , and we 'll make him a crusty old pilot .
?
but wait , she has to have a fianc ?
e ; that can be david schwimmer .
?
but wait , if she has a fianc ?
e , how will she and harrison ford crash on the island alone ?
?
i know ! ?
they 'll get to their vacation spot , and then she 'll get called back ! ?
yessssss !
?
so , they 'll crash on the island , and that will be funny for about five minutes . ?
shucks .
oh , i 've got it ! ?
we 'll throw in a distracting subplot in which her fianc ?
e has sex with a really attractive woman who acts like a bimbo , and then he can feel guilty . ?
then , when anne heche kisses harrison ford ( they have to kiss , because otherwise nobody will want to see the movie ) , it will be a vindicated action , because her fianc ?
e will already have cheated on her ! ?
then , for no obvious reason , they 'll accidentally run into pirates who try to kill them . ?
oh , yes ! ?
i feel so good about this story . ?
instead of using characterization to propel the events , it will be completely random , and yet totally predictable ! ?
imagine that .
do n't get me wrong --
six days , seven nights is not a boring picture ; ford and heche both do a great job .
?
the sparks fly between them , and so most of browning 's inane dialogue is drowned out by the actors ' sheer force of talent . ?
almost every scene between them has energy that the performers bring to the screen , and i found myself laughing pretty hard . ?
schwimmer is also funny , and manages to milk all of his scenes for whatever he can get . ? and reitman , who has made some good films , at least tries to make things exciting . ?
even though the pirate subplot is profoundly dumb , i was prepared to be pleasantly sidetracked by the action sequences .
it 's
just when i start to think about the story that my contempt for this film surfaces .
?
the picture feels like it 's been hacked to pieces --
i would n't be surprised if five or six inept subplots have been edited out completely . ?
the ones that are here are as bad as they come
( i think i let out a very audible groan when they get the first glimpse of the pirate ships ) , and i 'd just like to shake the producers by the shoulders and scream , " why did you pick this awful script ! ?
"
?
the film is outright stupid , but some of the elements are subtly horrifying .
?
for instance , take the subplot in which the schwimmer character has sex with the bimbo , and then feels really guilty . ?
this is a serious problem in real life , but six days , seven nights reduces any chance of complexity to a weak plot device : ?
his actions are what makes it okay for heche to kiss ford . ? in a script that lacks even a glimpse of intelligent subtlety , i find it odd that such a strangely insulting device ended up in the story .
this is summer movie season , but that does n't mean our movies have to be dumb . ?
1998 so far has been one of the worst years in recent memory for summer blockbusters . ?
when i was in line for six days , seven nights , i heard the woman in front of me ask for " two tickets to that new harrison ford movie .
"
?
why did n't she know the name of the film ? ?
i suppose she just did n't care .
?
what bothers me even more is that the people who make these big - budget pictures do n't realize that their films are becoming parodies of themselves . ?
good actors should sign to good scripts , and if hollywood insists on making flicks to rake in cash , they least they could do is assume that we 'd like to spend our money on a story worth more than ten cents .

Ex Output:
N