Premise:
"They are not important. "
Hypothesis: They are of the utmost importance.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: The Honorable Daniel Akaka Chairman The Honorable James Inhofe Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Readiness and Management Support Committee on Armed Services United States Senate If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Daniel Akaka is one of the members of the United States Senate."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "LC50s for flow-through tests with Mysidopsis bahia and Cyprinodon variegatus were calculated two different ways -- (1) on the basis of the nominal toxicant concentrations (Nom), and (2) on the basis of measured (Meas) toxicant concentrations.", can we conclude that "One of the ways LC50s were calculated was with nomincal toxicant concentrations."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: They would forget that we are products not just of evolution, but also of what we imagine ourselves to be.

Sentence B: We are only products of evolution.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: The entrance is marked by two huge torii gates, their pillars made from 1,700-year-old cypress trees.
The torii gates' pillars next to the entrance were made using the wood of oak trees.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
The nanny, by comparison, can be trusted to control the children, but her constant presence irritates the children and slows down the shoot.

Here is a hypothesis:
The nanny controls the kids.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes