In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Very true. Let's blame this on the gay, pedophile/ephebophile priests and the bishops who covered for them.

Output: Identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: "There would be no deadly terror attacks in the U.K. if Muslims didn't live there."
The families of the thousands killed in the UK by the IRA and protestant radicals might disagree.

Output: Identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Re: "Trump seems like a loose cannon."

"SEEMS"???

Re: "Shouldn't he have advisors and the like to caution and restrain him before he goes off saying things that could cause negative repercussions?"

It isn't POSSIBLE to "restrain" him. He already does have myriad "advisors" to caution him - and he couldn't care less. He is reckless AND dangerous.

Re: "Especially some of his sweeping crazy assertions, like the one where he said Ford was planning to shut down in the States and move the jobs to Mexico."

If you weren't already well-aware, lying is his M.O.

Re: "By saying erroneous things, he can hurt Ford shareholders"

Again, he does not CARE.

Re: "and if wrong and carelessly considered"

"IF"???

Re: "even he is subject to lawsuits."

He is currently the subject of some 3,500 lawsuits.

Re: "As the prospective president, he carries a burden of due diligence in his pronouncements."

Yes he does, but ... He. Does. Not, CARE.
Output: Non-identity-attack