Premise:
"if you don't drink you know you used to drink okay you go out and you want to party and that's that's something you do when you're young and dumb i guess"
Hypothesis: I guess you drink when you are young and dumb but eventually you grow out of it.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: Indeed, compared to the prewar wealthy, the contemporary rich have no apparent class markers. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The contemporary rich have built an empire on being the children of prewar wealthy."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Then again, if the Times were to embrace the virtue of a Style section (or is that a vice?)", can we conclude that "It is my opinion that the Times should stick to what it knows best and prevent the introduction of a Style section."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: But the really interesting thing about Java is that Gilder isn't the only one using this kind of language.

Sentence B: Java is not interesting because Gilder isn't the only one using this kind of language.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: I'm afraid this is kind of a one joke question, and the joke is cheap and easy blasphemy.
There have been protests about the blasphemous nature of the joke.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
The finest and most authentic work is mashrabiya, the lattice screens that covered Ottoman windows allowing women to watch the world go by without being seen.

Here is a hypothesis:
Mashrabiya screens are very poorly crafted and offer no privacy to women.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no