IN: Jeff: Sorry this took so long but here are my thoughts on the above: 1. In Section 3.1 (c), I'm assuming that the additional sections were added because we will get these reps in another agreement from the Trust. Is that correct? 2. In Section 3.4 e), the new language regarding rescission of acceleration I think belongs after the phrase that begins, "if the effect of such failure..." Also, where did the new language regarding prepayments at the end come from? Is this in the Revolver or in Enron's existing deals? 3. Section 3.11 should be made subject to Section 5.7 or vice versa. Carol

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Swap Assignment Agreement - April 20 Draft

IN: Tracy: Sorry to bother you with this one again - in 1999 and 2000, what were the revenues and costs associated with the base gas sales - the footnote disclosure indicates $53 million and $34 million in sales but not the cost. In addition, going forward, how much of the 2001 and 2002 TG&S expense is solely related to this transaction (i.e. expenses that would not be incurred but for this transaction)? My question may be a bit confusing - call me if I am totally off base!

Generate a subject line.

OUT: More base gas questions

IN: p a p e r l o o p . c o m d a i l y n e w s s e r v i c e Welcome to paperloop.com, the premier information and exchange service for the pulp, paper, converting, and printing industries. THURSDAY, Nov. 15, 2001

Generate a subject line.

OUT: paperloop news for Thursday, Nov. 15, 2001

IN: Attached please find the referenced lists. On the list of 3/12/01a, I have not yet seen the list from Gobal Contracts with the corrected names, but I cannot believe Lyke Corporation (also called Ripon Community Printers) is a valid legal name. We might want to get that sorted out before we start trading with them.

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
Clickpaper lists for 3/12/01 and 3/12/01a