In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.

Example Input: Context: Poultry remains a major source of foodborne bacterial infections. A variety of additives with presumed anti-microbial and/or growth-promoting effects are commonly added to poultry feed during commercial grow-out, yet the effects of these additives on the gastrointestinal microbial community (the GI microbiome) as the bird matures remain largely unknown. Here we compared temporal changes in the cecal microbiome to the effects of formic acid, propionic acid, and medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) added to feed and/or drinking water.', 'Cecal bacterial communities at day of hatch (n=5 birds), 7d (n=32), 21d (n=27), and 42d (n=36) post-hatch were surveyed using direct 454 sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons from each bird in combination with cultivation-based recovery of a Salmonella Typhimurium marker strain and quantitative-PCR targeting Clostridium perfringens. Treatment effects on specific pathogens were generally non-significant. S. Typhimurium introduced by oral gavage at day of hatch was recovered by cultivation from nearly all birds sampled across treatments at 7d and 21d, but by 42d, S. Typhimurium was only recovered from ca. 25% of birds, regardless of treatment. Sequencing data also revealed non-significant treatment effects on genera containing known pathogens and on the cecal microbiome as a whole. In contrast, temporal changes in the cecal microbiome were dramatic, highly significant, and consistent across treatments. At 7d, the cecal community was dominated by three genera (Flavonifractor, Pseudoflavonifractor, and a Lachnospiracea sequence type) that accounted for more than half of sequences. By 21d post-hatch, a single genus (Faecalibacterium) accounted for 23-55% of sequences, and the number of Clostridium 16S rRNA gene copies detected by quantitative-PCR reached a maximum.\Question: Are successional changes in the chicken cecal microbiome during 42 days of growth independent of organic acid feed additives?
Example Output: Over the 42 d experiment, the cecal bacterial community changed significantly as measured by a variety of ecological metrics and increases in the complexity of co-occurrence networks. Management of poultry to improve animal health, nutrition, or food safety may need to consider the interactive effects of any treatments with the dramatic temporal shifts in the taxonomic composition of the cecal microbiome as described here.

Example Input: Context: Transport across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is an important mediator of beta-amyloid (A) accumulation in the brain and a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). One of the receptors responsible for the transport of A in the BBB is the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1). LRP1 is susceptible to proteolytic shedding at the cell surface, which prevents endocytic transport of ligands. Previously, we reported a strong inverse correlation between LRP1 shedding in the brain and A transit across the BBB. Several proteases contribute to the ectodomain shedding of LRP1 including the -secretase, a desintegrin and metalloproteinase domain containing protein 10 (ADAM10).", 'The role of ADAM10 in the shedding of LRP1 and A BBB clearance was assessed through pharmacological inhibition of ADAM10 in an in vitro model of the BBB and through the use of ADAM10 endothelial specific knock-out mice. In addition, an acute treatment paradigm with an ADAM10 inhibitor was also tested in an AD mouse model to assess the effect of ADAM10 inhibition on LRP1 shedding and Abrain accumulation.', 'In the current studies, inhibition of ADAM10 reduced LRP1 shedding in brain endothelial cultures and increased A42 transit across an in vitro model of the BBB. Similarly, transgenic ADAM10 endothelial knockout mice displayed lower LRP1 shedding in the brain and significantly enhanced A clearance across the BBB compared to wild-type animals. Acute treatment with the ADAM10-selective inhibitor GI254023X in an AD mouse model substantially reduced brain LRP1 shedding and increased A40 levels in the plasma, indicating enhanced A transit from the brain to the periphery. Furthermore, both soluble and insoluble A40 and A42 brain levels were decreased following GI254023X treatment, but these effects lacked statistical significance.\Question: Does inhibition of ADAM10 promote the clearance of A across the BBB by reducing LRP1 ectodomain shedding?
Example Output: These studies demonstrate a role for ADAM10 in the ectodomain shedding of LRP1 in the brain and the clearance of A across the BBB, which may provide a novel strategy for attenuating A accumulation in the AD brain.

Example Input: Context: Cam impingement as a known sequelae of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) has led to speculation that subclinical SCFEs may be the causative factor in idiopathic cam morphology; alternatively, others have implicated an abnormal extension of the growth plate as a causative factor.', 'To investigate the growth plate tilt angle in 4 patient cohorts: normal patients, patients with idiopathic cam morphology (CamIP), patients with cam morphology secondary to known SCFE (CamSCFE), and patients with incidental findings of an asymptomatic cam (Camasymp).', 'Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.', 'A database of 192 computed tomography scans of abdomens/pelvises of patients (ages, 5-19 years) with no known orthopaedic issues, reformatted to neutral tilt, inclination, and rotation, were utilized for the normal cohort, the Camasymp cohort, and to create an age- and sex-matched control cohort. In addition, a retrospective review of all patients treated for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with preoperative advance imaging was conducted, and patients were separated to CamIP and CamSCFE cohorts. The alpha angle and tilt angle were measured on each hip. Statistical analysis was performed.', 'The mean tilt angle among the normal patients was 12.1, with 1.9% of the variation in tilt angle being explained by age; each additional year of age decreased the tilt angle by 0.27 (P = .008). The tilt angle for the CamSCFE cohort (mean, 44.5) was found to be significantly greater than both the CamIP cohort (mean, 5.9; P < .001) and the control cohort (mean, 12.8; P < .001). The tilt angle for the CamIP cohort was found to be significantly less than the control cohort (P = .003). The alpha angle and tilt angle were positively correlated in the CamIP cohort, but no correlation was found in the other cohorts. The mean tilt angle of the 18 hips in the Camasymp cohort was 13.9 11.5 (range, -12 to 37), with 12 hips (67%) in the tilt angle range of CamIP cohort and 6 in the tilt angle range of CamSCFE.\Question: Is idiopathic Cam Morphology Caused by Subclinical Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis : An MRI and CT Study?
Example Output:
The proximal femoral growth plate normally has a posterior tilt that becomes more anterior through maturation. Idiopathic cam morphology has a drastically different growth plate tilt angle than cam morphology secondary to SCFE, suggesting that a majority of idiopathic cam morphology is not the result of subclinical SCFEs.