[QUESTION] Premise: "A small image used to signify a broken web image link."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A tiny image used as a symbol for a broken image link on a white background with a 404 message underneath." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
An image may not be a symbol and a and broken link may not have a a white background with a 404 message underneath.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: If "Two men and a woman eating cake at a restaurant." does that mean that "Two men and a woman are eating chocolate cake with white frosting."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A cake does not have to be chocolate or have white frosting.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "Smiling boy buried in sand up to his waist." that "A boy is playing in the sand."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: The boy is happy to be buried in the sand which is the result of him playing in it.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A skateboarder wearing a black shirt is doing a trick."
Hypothesis: "A person is skateboarding."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A skateboarder is a person and doing a trick on a skateboard constitutes skateboarding.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "Two men are leaning on the rail near the water." is it true that "Two men are leaning on a rail fishing in the water."?
A: Men can be leaning on a rail near water even if they aren't fishing.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Groups of people are riding down a river in rafts." is it true that "Groups of people are riding down the street in rafts."?
People riding down a river can't be riding down the street simultaneously.
The answer is no.