Next Question: Premise: "It's football practice as a small group of players take a stance on the field watched by four onlookers on the sidelines."
Hypothesis: "Football players are taking a shit."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
My Answer: Let's think. You definitely can not take a stance and a stance simultaneously. The answer is no.

Next Question: Can we conclude from "A woman opens a present while drinking beer." that "Gril is drinking beer."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
My Answer: Let's think. Sentences are reversed. There's no connection to beer and opening a present. The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Next Question: Can we conclude from "Two male basketball players are playing a competitive game while the referee is standing behind watching." that "A referee is watching two male basketball players play the game."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
My Answer: Let's think. Sentence one focuses on the actions of the basketball players playing the game while sentence two focuses on the referee who is watching the basketball players play the game. The answer is yes.

Next Question: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A worker is driving a piece of green colored machinery on a city sidewalk."
Hypothesis: "A man is driving an orange tractor through a field."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
My Answer:
Let's think. A worker could mean a man or woman. The machinery doesn't necessarily have to be a tractor and it can only be either green or orange. The machinery cannot be driven on a city sidewalk and field simultaneously. The answer is no.