Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Thanks for letting us all know that money is more important to you than the unnecessary death of a loved one at the hands of an uncaring system. The rest of us, however, actually care about our loved ones, especially those who are killed by an institution that not only is supposed to care for them and keep them safe, but has an affirmative legal duty to do so.

A: Yes
****
Q: Yeah, I'm a "drone". Maybe do a little thinking for yourself instead of taking the internet's word for it that it's true. Bye-bye now!

A: No
****
Q: "His own party's leaders realized he'd become a huge impediment and, armed with insider information not available to voters a few months earlier, showed him the door."

Yet more innuendo and insinuation thrown at Kitzhaber. What "insider" info are you referring to? None of you have produced anything that is tangible or concrete in nature. It is all based purely on suspicion. I'm shocked that everyone is being so self-righteous in condemning Kitzhaber, that you cannot see how utterly unfair this is.

McCarthyism: a campaign or practice that endorses the use of unfounded allegations and unfair investigations.

.

A:
No
****