In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: What a scumbag. Golovan (and nome) you ought to boot this pile of crap. He is a joke, just cause its technically legal it is immoral to pull this crap. The state has been broke for several years but this guy just kept on sucking the state tit dry. A state employee would lose his job if they Pulled this crap. And basically that's what these clowns are...
Obscene

Comment: In the trade fight Christy Clark is the loud talking 90 pound weakling who is going to get the crap kicked out of her by the big bad American bully.
Is this the way we want it? No, but this is the reality of the trade dispute. Nice try Clark but every one is aware that your bluster only amounts to a bucket of warm spit as far as the Americans are concerned.
Obscene

Comment: If evidence is found it will not be made public at once. It will be presented to Trump, his cabinet and Congress for analysis. If the evidence is conclusive and a conspiracy is recognizable, Trump will be offered a choice between resignation - like Nixon before him - or impeachment and perhaps prison. You are correct to say that unsubstantiated allegations are not proof. These leaks come from the FBI and the intelligence community; do you really think they are on the level of Breitbart and that Jones idiot on the radio? Think logically for a minute: calls were made throughout the campaign by those close to Trump, not just Flynn - this is a fact that has been publicized. Just what do you think they were discussing? Ivanka's newest hairdo?
Non-obscene