instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
That means you'd lose your welfare checks, Dial.
answer:
No

question:
Trump is obviously not qualified to be President, but neither is Hillary. JohnnKiriakou, former CIA Officer, writes; " If Hillary Clinton gets a free pass on Espionage from President OBAMA, so should whistleblowers". " . Hillary Clinton " appears to have committed a very serious violation of the country's most important laws governing the use and misuse of classified information, she revealed the names of undercover CIA officers by using her unclassified and unprotected personal email server.. That may be a violation of both the a Espionage Act of 1917 and the Intelligence Identities Act of 1982". The media needs to get serious about these candidates character.
answer:
Yes

question:
That's a silly response. First, Copernicus illustrated the movement of the planets around the sun. Not the sun around the planet. Second, what human intervention occurs in relation to the sun? We have a direct influence on the earth's environment as we interact with it every moment of every day. Don't think that's the case with the sun. Third, going back to the OP's post and using that to rif on a favorite conservative position - As it is prudent to assume that all 'others' are looking to rob, kill, or rape us it is thus only prudent to carry a gun everywhere, why is it not prudent in the face of our possible (though, really the data clearly points to our complicity in accelerating climate change) involvement in accelerating climate change to take actions to prevent or combat, much like feeling the need to carry a weapon to prevent or combat a theoretical attack?
answer:
Yes