Detailed Instructions: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
Problem:Comment: Was that before a black man went to an English court in Virginia and got it to "award" him, a former black indentured servant as a life-long slave? (In the 1600's? The 1st documented "slave" in the American colonies?) There were free blacks who owned black slaves. Slavery was economic, not racial. As for the 2nd amendment, neither the government nor the Constitution grant "rights". The Constitution lists the most important, which is directing the government to guarantee and protect them, nothing more or less! Man has had the natural right to self protection since the dawn of time. And if you're referring to "stealing" a country (I'm assuming vis a vis the "indians") they weren't indigenous, they also came from somewhere else....and eliminated the peoples here before them. Perhaps you should apply your same standards to the daily massacres committed BY blacks ON blacks in all liberal controlled inner cities, like Baltimore, Detroit, Chicago, etc. liberals are such hypocrites.
Solution:
Identity-attack