In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
Example: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Example solution: Sexual-explicit
Example explanation: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.

Problem: Comment: The Catholic Church has never needed permission to pick and choose for whom it would perform any ceremony.

That has not changed because the *states* are now required to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples. There is no relationship between the two. Obergefell does not require any church to do a single damn thing. And everyone with an IQ above room temperature knows that or is capable of reading the decision and figuring that out.

The Catholics used to be focused on things like orphanages and priceless artifacts and poisoning each other at the Vatican. They should stick to that, and stop trying to gin up more false grist for the propaganda machine that is rapidly destroying our democracy and turning the U.S. into ungovernable factions where every problem has to be solved in federal court. Sorry, boys (and it is boys, because the nuns *do not care*) we aren't going back to any of the centuries you would like to return to. Go back to arguing about angels and pinheads.
Solution: Non-sexual-explicit