IN: This is an email
Hello all, Lorraine and I have been unable to get ourselves down to the meetings lately. Being new parents has us pretty exhausted but we are getting the hang of it. Tyler James is growing so fast. Maybe next month we will make it. Anyway, we did have a question about the newly adopted city lot size ordinance that was passed in December. Is there something printed that specifically addresses how this affects our neighborhood? Do we know what the average lot size is in Montrose? Does this mean that no more old classic homes can be torn down to build 3 townhomes? Also, we were wondering if anyone has noticed the parking problems lately due to the Eclesiastic church on Taft? They seem to provide no parking for their events which seem to occur more often every month. They have done alot of work on that church and I have never noticed one single permit posted on their structure. We don't really know these people and have nothing against them but don't they need to comply with city parking and building codes? Maybe these issues can be addressed in next months newsletter?

What is the subject?

OUT: *EMCA* City lot size ordinance
QUESTION: Part I: Dress Code for Female FERC Lawyers at FERC Proceedings* Skirts must be mid-calf length and of a synthetic fabric. All clothing worn in FERC hearing rooms must be properly aged (12 years or more). No solid-colored garments are permitted. Exceptions: mauve, pink, peach, teal, harvest gold. Hair must be fuzzy, multi-colored and must partially conceal the face. Suntan hose must be worn at all times. Open-toed shoes (preferably in a lighter color than the hem of the skirt) are preferred. Those with a flair for fashion are permitted to wear inexpensive animal print garments, metallic accessories or clothing with fake fur trim, so as to attract attention to one's originality. *also applicable to female practitioners at the Texas Railroad Commission and Public Utilities Commission.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: so ya wanna be a FERC lawyer
Jim, Per your and others' authority, on Friday, December 15, I sent to Sharron West, the lead adjuster for Underwriters on the above-referenced three insurance claims, a request for an extension of time by which the insureds could filed suit against Underwriters through and including March 15, 2002. I will give you a call on Wednesday, and if you have heard nothing by then from Underwriters, we can discuss a follow-up. I would greatly prefer to have some response before the intervention of the Christmas holidays. I will keep you advised. Britt
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: In re Enron Petrochemicals Claim Against Underwriters/In re M/V PACIFIC VIRGO/In re M/V INDUSTRIAL BRIDGE
Sorry I never called yesterday...I had turned my phone off and didn't realize you'd called until last night. I'm still at work right now and therefore am extremely tired. Hope you got everything you needed to accomplished this weekend. I had a good time at the game and, thanks to Travis's pledge class reunion, have come to the conclusion that 27-28 is a better age range for me. There young enough to excuse being single due to career focus and still old enough to know who they are and what they want. Some critical things happen in those 3-5 years from a man's late twenties to early thirties that can expose so many "issues" (examples of which I got to see several of on Saturday). Talk to you soon, Susan Are you and Doug going to OU?
Answer: Delayed reaction
Here is an email: I talked to John Fielder (SVP Edison) about setting up a meeting for Barry Tycholiz with Edison's CFO about hedging Edison's QF price risk. Fielder wanted to talk about the negative CTC issue. Here's what he said: They plan to "settle" with the ESPs and pay them when they pay everyone else, which he re-iterated would be sometime in Q1'02. Edison is holding firm to the notion that the negative CTC contributed to the utility's undercollection and that the ESP's share of the undercollection has to be netted against the payables attributable to the negative CTC and owed the ESP. He said that they will propose to net it out in one of two ways: 1) lump sum netting (i.e., if they owe $50MM and the share of the undercollection is $30 MM, then they pay the ESP $20 MM; or 2) future reductions in PX Credit (i.e., they pay the ESP $50 MM, and then reduce the PX going forward until the $30 MM is paid down). The numbers are illustrative only. In addition, he said that they have the view that a decision is going to have to be made about 1) whether DA customers pay for stranded costs tied to the DWR L-T contracts, and 2) whether DA customers pay going forward for stranded costs tied to the QF contracts. (Edison is clearly lobbying the PUC to get DA customers to pay for these costs.) I recommended strongly that he de-link issues 1 and 2 above from the issue of paying us ASAP what they owe us for negative CTC. He agreed. He said that the PUC judge's recently issued pre-hearing conference order requires that Edison "meet and confer" with ESPs prior to the Nov. 7th hearing, and that Edison intends to set something up with ESPs prior to that hearing. Fielder is also the point person on "getting ESPs paid" and intends to initiate settlement discussions with ESPs week after next. It was very clear from the conversation that Edison is going to do everything possible (at the expense of creditors) to maximize headroom under the settlement it struck with the PUC a few weeks ago. Edison's stalemate with the QFs is evidence of it. We shouldn't assume anything different with the Negative CTC issue. If you have any questions, let us know. Best,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Conversation with Edison re: Getting Negative CTC Paid
QUESTION: Dear Fellow Sisters, I urge you to visit the following website: www.rawa.org It is dedicated to informing the world about the repression and persecution of women under the Taliban in Afganistan. The picture gallery slide show is not for the faint of heart. I was so moved that I had to send a monetary contribution. I just hope it helps to end all of their suffering. Those BASTARDS!!! Sylvia
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
RAWA