Here is an email: Hey there! I went to jeep at lunch. The guy is giving me a good price on the car. However, he is trying to screw me on the price of my car. He is telling me that the price of the car purchased from the dealership is as follows... Manuf price $23,668 +sun roof- $704.00 +destination charge $600.00 + a few addl charges$364.00 Total price $25,336 That is pretty consistent with what I show for the price. Possibly taking off a few of those fees but that is pretty minimal... I am thinking that I should sell my car myself... What do you think. Please see the attached file. This is how the guy is trying to screw me.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: jeep
Q: Draft of transcribed message from Richard Sanders voice mail (Legal) to Rick Shapiro. Rick forwarded to Jim Steffes. FYI: "We have not seen the Reliant Protective Order. It's only been described to me by their General Counsel. And in the way it was described it was a document that we would probably agree to, because there's still some corks(? and provisions over disagreements about the Confidentiality. So, I'm gonna try to get Mike Kirby to get ahold of it this a.m. in terms of the theme to the Legislators. The question I've got is why haven't we even been offered that same deal? It shows clearly that they're trying to isolate us, and that they're treating us differently from everyone else., but I'm not sure how far that goes....."
Propose a subject line
A: Reliant Protective Order
IN: Dear John, dear Vincent, Let me up-date you on the roundtables we decided in the last meeting to focus on during the rest of the academic year. The original idea was to keep the number of events from 3 to 4 roundtables each semester. The result of the last meeting with all members was driven by enthusiasm, and as you see below we produced a prolific list of 13 subjects. Maybe you can help us to narrow down to a reasonable number, 12 events (one we had yesterday) by May 2002 we think are too many. I also would take this opportunity to update on the ongoing relationships with the most prominent industry in the sectors and have your feedback, suggestion on how to group them in the roundtable. We got great support so far from Reliant, Enron, Mirant, Schell (Coral), Bp, Duke. El Paso, Chevron-Texaco, Phillips, and Halliburton etc.. also are interested and we will present the club to them as well. The major challenge for us is not transform the Energy Club in a Finance Energy Club. At Rice we already have a Finance club and it works very well. We want first educate about the energy industry in general, and second present the opportunities for MBAs in the industry in different areas, including finance but not limited to. Topics of Roundtable Meetings: 0) Energy "101" 1) Corporate Finance (Treasurer or Controller) 2) Energy Consulting 3) Financial Services (trading, risk management) 4) Origination, Marketing and Sales (Oil, Gas, Electricity) - Marteen 5) Project Development, strategic planning 6) Project Finance 7) Project Risk Management 8) Regulation, Deregulation, and Restructuring - Reliant done 9/17/2001 9) Structuring of Products 10) Supply Chain 11) Telecom - Broadband 12) Venture Capital within energy industry - Brian, Paresh Thanks in advance for your precious suggestions and I am looking forward to meeting you.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Rice Energy Club Roundtable topics
IN: This is an email
All, Attached, for your information, is a 2 page financial and statistical fact sheet for EGM (as a consolidated unit and for each business unit). I obviously would have liked our gross margin and EBIT to be a lot larger but all the other facts show enormous growth and progress. I wanted to at least get it into your hands in case you needed a quick reference. Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: EGM Q3 fact sheet
QUESTION: I agree with Rick. I know Jose is tied up on current business, but his input will be important. To date we have been relying on legal analysis of required approvals etc. That information is essential but it is, as you know, about 10% of the issue. The far more critical considerations are how is the government likely to react on a political level and what can we do about it. I think our government affairs people are in the best position to make these assessments.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Project California
IN: Bob: Are there any issues that might be useful for your goup that I should address? Also, I would like to chat with you about settlements on multiple trades. An interesting issue was raised in our credit lunch last week. Please let me know when you are available. Thanks. Sara

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
Friday luncheon