Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: "cost would be minimal in the scheme of things" If you sell your car and you only get 2 per cent more than it is worth; (Worth $1,000 and you get $1,020) and you have to pay 2.5% tax on the sale that means you have to pay $1,025. So you now have to pay more than your profit was. Multiply that so the $1,000 is really $1 million dollars of a small construction project, and you might understand the effect of this tax. ($20,000 profit; $25,000 tax. Knife River will have to pay $5,000 more than you actually made.)

Answer: Yes

Question: Hey look! It got posted! You're allowed to disagree, the idea is to be civil about it.

Answer: No

Question: I am hardly a Trump supporter. I will always attempt to keep your posts honest as the facts when you are overcome by hyperbole or your emotions, however.

I don't have to agree with anything anyone says; I just have to vote against the worst of two seriously flawed candidates.

I am concerned about Hillary (and Bill) as a serial war monger, serial liar, serial misogynist (against Bill's women) and lack of ethics regarding the source of money for the Clinton Foundation as well as her cozy relationship with the 1% who are funding her campaign. Her morals in pursuit of the office are virtually non-existent.

Trump may well be the lesser of two evils this year.

Income distribution is not my hot button; throwing away lives in the Middle East for no possible gain is.

Answer:
Yes