In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: Ha ha "scientists".
More like shills of the Democrat party who will lose their Global Warming research grants.
I hear there are lots of jobs opening up in the food servixes indusrty...perhaps, if they work at it, they could qualify for one of those positions.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: You don't want a discussion, you want to explain these terrorist attacks away by blaming it all on the West.
If it's all the West's fault, why are these terrorist organizations killing more Muslims than Westerners? Why are they forcing Arabs to adhere to their strict interpretation of Islam? Why are they raping Arab girls, enslaving Arab women, mass killing Arab men?
Explain why ISIL wants to create a caliphate from legitimate ,recognized countries? You have not once acknowledged that ISIL is responsible for many of these attacks, and they cannot be considered an organization representing your average Arab. Unless, you try to twist the argument to fit your narrative.
You're argument is coloured by your obvious hatred for the Jews, so you do not have a pertinent argument; otherwise, you would have used it.
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: "The Department of Homeland Security's acting administrator of the region that includes Puerto Rico said distribution had been hampered by the destruction of roads and bridges, which makes it hard to get supplies to those in need."

Duh.

It's interesting what they decided not to include in the article, same ol' crap, trying to trash others during a disaster, typical.
Example Output:
Non-identity-attack