Question:
Based on the premise "well i mean uh they no more punishment per se", can we conclude that "No one really punishes their kids anymore."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: In cases where the willingness to pay of the sender is related to content, it might be possible to argue that content would continue to be recognized in rates.

Sentence B: In cases where the willingness to pay of the sender is related to content, it might be possible to argue that content would continue to be recognized in rates.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Shellfish is served with rice in an unlikely but very tasty sauce of olive oil, ground almonds, assorted spices, and chocolate, though local cooks sometimes cheat a bit by adding octopus and other shell-less tidbits.
The dish usually includes shellfish and rice, but local cooks sometimes add octopus.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
They even went to Buddhist temples to worship the feminine Kannon deities, which were resculpted holding a child to represent Mary and Jesus.

Here is a hypothesis:
Worshipping the deities were the only reason people came to the Buddhist temples.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Wanniski, who invited Farrakhan to a conference last spring, argues that a Republican-nation alliance could guarantee an unbeatable electoral majority for the GOP.

Sentence 2: Farrakhan was never invited to a conference last spring, not even by Wanniski.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"but i uh sounds like you like one thing that i like like swimming you like that a lot"
Hypothesis: you enjoy swimming very much
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes