In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
One example: Comment: Enough already. Cut the head off this snake.
Solution is here: Threat
Explanation: This comment conveys a violent threat to someone.

Now, solve this: Comment: Your description of Wheeler's response as "coy" is dishonest & misleading: it was straight-forward & honest. He's not going to take a stand on something he sees as divisive & points to work being done at the Leg as a better course. It's fine for voters to disagree with that, but setting it up with an unnecessary adjective is editorializing, not reporting.

Plus you take a single response to a single question, an incomplete response for that matter, and you do not put it into the context of anything else he's said. That's not just misleading; it's poor journalism. (And let's not even get into how bad the headline is.)
Solution:
Non-threat