You will be given a context and a verb separated with a newline character, and you have to answer if the given verb can be anchored in time or not. We say a verb can be anchored in the real timeline if and only if a verb happened in the past, is happening now, or is guaranteed to happen in the future. The output should be "Yes" if the verb can be anchored in time and "No" otherwise.

Q: The concern in Cuba always has been that if Gonzalez goes he will immediately become involved in political and legal problems that will prevent his speedy return. Elian's paternal grandmother, Mariela, told reporters that she was willing to go to Miami to retrieve her grandson if it was assured to her that she could pick him up and return immediately to Cuba without (become) embroiled in legal or political problems.
Verb: become

A: No
****
Q: Embassy employees in both cities have gone back to work, although in new locations. The bombed-out Embassy in Nairobi is (expected) to be demolished after the FBI has finished gathering evidence.
Verb: expected

A: No
****
Q: He was immediately released into the custody of relatives in Miami _ and just as quickly embraced as a pawn in the poisonous estrangement between Fidel Castro's regime and its opponents in exile. This page has argued from the start that Elian not be (denied) due process because of his youth, and the INS appears to have moved carefully.
Verb: denied

A:
No
****