You are given a conversation between two people. 'Person1:' and 'Person2:' are used to separate their respective dialogues. If the conversation begins with a question, label it '1' otherwise '0'.

[Q]: Person1: I heard that you went to the concert the day before ? How did you like it ?
Person2: It was terrific.The concert was really a hit.The symphony orchestra was so good that I was completely absorbed in their performance .
Person1: Who was the conductor ?
Person2: Oh , speaking of the conductor , he is indeed a genius.He did a perfect job.His name is Menuhin , a descendent of Russian American immigrants .
Person1: Oh , I learned that he is also a legendary violinist .
Person2: Absolutely right.He gave a performance of Felix Mendelssohn's violin concerto.That caused a sensation.The audience were stunned by his pure tone .
Person1: Obviously you did enjoy the concert .
Person2: Yes , I did .
[A]: 1

[Q]: Person1: Where should I park ?
Person2: Do you have a car or motorbike ?
Person1: I drive a scooter
Person2: In that case , you can park either in a student lot or on the street . Are you aware of the marked handicapped spots ?
Person1: No , I haven't seen those spots .
Person2: The handicapped logo with blue means that you are not to park there unless you have a handicapped permit . Will you mostly be parking during the day or the night ?
Person1: I park in the daytime .
Person2: Make sure you pay special attention to the street signs with time limits . Have you noticed those signs ?
Person1: No , I have not seen the signs .
Person2: Pay attention to what the signs tell you in terms of time limits and what days you can park there . Do you know what the curb colors mean ?
Person1: No , I don't know what the curb colors mean .
Person2: Just remember that red means absolutely no parking and white means loading and unloading only . I think you'll be good to go !
[A]: 1

[Q]: Person1: We ' Ve been over this a thousand times . The data is irrefutable ! Look , we ' Ve done extensive research , built studies , and read the literature , and there is conclusive evidence to support my theory !
Person2: Horowitz , I beg to differ . Even in your most recent study , the investigative approach was flawed ! You know as well as I do that the collection of data was not systematic , and there is a large margin of error . To draw a definitive conclusion based on that data would be misleading
Person1: That is preposterous !
Person2: You are trying to single-handedly solve one of the world ' s greatest mysteries , and yet you are oblivious to the fact that you are wrong !
Person1: I am not wrong ! The chicken came first !
Person2: No ! The egg came first !
[A]:
0