You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Comment: Why do right wingers have so little respect for the rule of law when the law does not advance their personal interests? Is it a lack of empathy? Or a more general lack of basic human decency? I don't doubt that pBurns9 would be the first one to run to the courts if his rights were violated.
Solution: Disagree
Why? This comment expresses strong disagreement with right-wing politics, is disrespectful (accusing right-wingers "lack of basic human decency"), and comes with personal attack (to the user pBurns9). Thus, this comment is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement from others.

New input: Comment: Which "victims" is Munoz referring to? The victims in both of these rape cases are CHILDREN. Munoz never in either of her letters once mentioned the children who were raped by their parents and foster parent. Adding insult to injury, Munoz is only backing away because she's getting the message that law abiding Alaskans with morals are going to take her legislative seat away from her; as it should be. Too little too late, Munoz. How dare you back peddle for the wrong reason. Alaskans should continue pressuring Munoz to resign from the Legislature. Anything short of that is unacceptable.
Solution:
Agree