Question:
They were longitudinal, were made by on-site observers who sought participant-observer roles, and constituted an inquiry structured from an evolving understanding of events and their meaning to the persons involved in them.

Does it follow that "They were made on site by observers, constituted an inquiry, and were longitudinal."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If We know now that there is one person 98 who did not buy the poison. , can we say that "It was decided that fourteen people had bought the poison."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"Let's not dwell on the sheer dishonesty of insinuating that I, or any serious writers on evolutionary psychology, believe infidelity or genocide or anything else is rendered inevitable genetically."
Hypothesis: Writers all think some groups are genetically prone to genocide.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: "But you must have heard some guesses about what started the cracks in the sky?" Dave suggested. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Dave knew something sinister did it. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "yeah yeah that in-fighting can really destroy a team and its ability to win", can we conclude that "In-fighting can ruin a team and impair its ability to win any games."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

input question: My system is based on his, though of course I have progressed rather further. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"I have not progressed very far with this type of system. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer:
no