Dressed in is a rephrasing of wearing. Crouching is another form of crouches.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Can we conclude from "A man wearing a blue shirt crouches on a rocky cliff." that "A man dressed in a blue shirt crouching on a cliff."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
yes
Being sheltered with an umbrella and carrying an umbrella could mean the same thing.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "A jogger is being sheltered with an umbrella." that "A jogger is carrying an umbrella."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
yes
A man in a black leather jacket is the man in a jacket that is sitting.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "A man in a black leather jacket sitting looking at the city beyond." can we conclude that "A man with a jacket is sitting down."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes
The man could be sweeping after the shop closes so the customers would not be coming.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Can we conclude from "A man wearing black sweeping brown tile floors outside of a tile shop." that "A man is sweeping the floor before the customers come."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell
A boy might not be young. A completely flat train track is not the same as an elevated train track.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A young boy in a green shirt playing with a miniature train on an elevated train track."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A boy playing with a train on the completely flat train track." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
Men playing instruments in the street are not necessarily apart of a band.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "Two men are playing instruments in the street."
Hypothesis: "The two men are apart of a band."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
it is not possible to tell