input: Washington (CNN) -- President Barack Obama's assertion of executive privilege ahead of a hearing before a House committee, which subsequently recommended his attorney general be cited for contempt of Congress, sets up a fight that has had mixed results in the past.

At stake are Justice Department documents relating to the flawed Fast and Furious gunrunning sting that House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-California, wants in his hands, and that Attorney General Eric Holder says are confidential.

The White House move means the Department of Justice can withhold the documents from the committee, which recommended by a 23-17 vote Wednesday that Holder be cited for contempt.

The full House is expected to consider the motion next week.

More details: House panel recommends contempt citation

If it votes to issue a contempt citation, a statement of facts would be delivered to the U.S. Attorney in the District of Columbia, "whose duty it shall be to bring the matter before the grand jury for its action," according to the law governing contempt citations.

Executive privilege also has been around since the earliest days of the country, and gives the executive branch the ability to withhold certain internal discussions and documents from scrutiny.

"It's there to give the executive branch some breathing room for its own deliberations," said Josh Chafetz, professor of law at Cornell Law School.

Executive privilege "has a long history, but it often plays out very differently," he said.

The last major confrontation over executive privilege also involved the Justice Department, but the partisan roles were reversed. 1. What the AG had done?
2. Who would have been hearing the case?
3. When?
4. Who was the AG?
5. Was the president supporting him?
6. What privilege he would exercise?
7. Did this work before?
8. Where the statement of facts would be sent?
9. in which district?
10. Where the attorney would send the matter then?
11. Which law stipulates all these?
12. Is executive privilege a new matter in the country?
13. From when we can trace it?
14. What power it gives to the executive branch?
15. What was the last such confrontation?
16. Was President Obama's party involved?
17. What sting is in question this time?
18. Who wanted the info?
19. Did the AG agree?
20. At the end did DOJ have to give the info away? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. contempt of Congress,
2. The full House
3. next week.
4. Eric Holder
5. Yes
6. executive privilege
7. Yes
8. to the U.S. Attorney
9. District of Columbia,
10. to the grand jury
11. the law governing contempt citations.
12. No
13. since the earliest days of the country,
14. the ability to withhold certain internal discussions and documents from scrutiny.
15. also involved the Justice Department,
16. No
17. the flawed Fast and Furious gunrunning sting
18. Darrell Issa
19. No
20. unknown

question: CHAPTER IX.

COUSINS.

"Come in," called Beth, answering a knock at her door.

Louise entered, and with a little cry ran forward and caught Beth in her arms, kissing her in greeting.

"You must be my new cousin--Cousin Elizabeth--and I'm awfully glad to see you at last!" she said, holding the younger girl a little away, that she might examine her carefully.

Beth did not respond to the caress. She eyed her opponent sharply, for she knew well enough, even in that first moment, that they were engaged in a struggle for supremacy in Aunt Jane's affections, and that in the battles to come no quarter could be asked or expected.

So they stood at arm's length, facing one another and secretly forming an estimate each of the other's advantages and accomplishments.

"She's pretty enough, but has no style whatever," was Louise's conclusion. "Neither has she tact nor self-possession, or even a prepossessing manner. She wears her new gown in a dowdy manner and one can read her face easily. There's little danger in this quarter, I'm sure, so I may as well be friends with the poor child."

As for Beth, she saw at once that her "new cousin" was older and more experienced in the ways of the world, and therefore liable to prove a dangerous antagonist. Slender and graceful of form, attractive of feature and dainty in manner, Louise must be credited with many advantages; but against these might be weighed her evident insincerity--the volubility and gush that are so often affected to hide one's real nature, and which so shrewd and suspicious a woman as Aunt Jane could not fail to readily detect. Altogether, Beth was not greatly disturbed by her cousin's appearance, and suddenly realizing that they had been staring at one another rather rudely, she said, pleasantly enough:
1. Who did Beth meet for the first time?
2. What was their relationship?
3. Were they competing for something?
4. What?
5. What did they do to each other after the saying hello?
6. What was Beth's estimation of Louise?
7. What was Louise's of Beth?
8. What did Beth think of Aunt Jane?
9. Was Beth agitated by Louise's appearance?
10. Is Beth a nickname?
11. What is her full name?
12. Who is older?
13. How did she greet Beth?
14. Did Beth respond?
15. Did she think Louise had any advantage?
16. Did she think she had any disadvantages?
17. What?
18. Did Beth think Aunt Jane would notice?
19. Did Louise think that Beth was stylish?
20. What did she think she lacked?
****
answer: 1. Louise
2. They're cousins
3. Yes
4. Aunt Jane's affections
5. Faced one another
6. That she was older and more experienced
7. She was pretty enough
8. She was shrewd and suspicious
9. No
10. Yes
11. Elizabeth
12. Louise
13. Hugged and kissed her
14. No
15. Yes
16. Yes
17. Her evident insincerity
18. Yes
19. No
20. Tact and self-possession

Question: (CNN) -- Scotland's Paul Lawrie carded a final round seven-under-par 65 on Sunday to win the Qatar Masters by four strokes, his second victory in the tournament.

The 43-year-old -- who also won in Doha in 1999, the year he went on the lift the British Open -- recorded a 15-under-par aggregate of 201, clear of Australian Jason Day and Sweden's Peter Hanson, in an event reduced to 54 holes because of high winds.

Holding a one-shot lead after Saturday's second round, Lawrie produced a bogey-free 18 holes, with a brilliant eagle on the par-five ninth the highlight of his round.

Day matched Lawrie's 65, and briefly threatened after opening with four successive birdies, but two dropped shots soon afterwards halted his charge.

Meanwhile, Hanson posted a 67 to follow up consecutive 69s to ensure he shared second place.

"I don't think I can play much better than that," Lawrie told the official European Tour website.

"I've been playing well for a long, long time, but it's just nice to come out one ahead and shoot seven- under-par.

"When you've got a chance to win a tournament you don't sleep as well the night before and things go racing through your mind," he added.

"You've got to get back to basics and I did that. I hit some nice shots coming in."

John Daly matched his opening 67 to finish alone in fourth place, six shots off the leader, while Sergio Garcia was one of four players who finished a further shot behind. 1. How old is Paul Lawrie?
2. What did he score on the last round?
3. What contest did he win?
4. How much did he win by?
5. Was it his first win in the tournament?
6. What number win was it?
7. Where did he win in 1999?
8. Who was golfing for Australia?
9. and Sweden?
10. Did Lawrie think he could have played much better?
11. Has he been playing well for a very short time?
12. When does he not sleep well? Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers:
1. 43
2. 65
3. Qatar Masters
4. seven-under-par
5. No
6. unknown
7. Doha
8. Jason Day
9. Peter Hanson
10. No
11. No
12. the night before