Subject: "Information Technology Systems Report".

Body: Due to the flooding, electrical and communications problems in Houston over the weekend, several Enron Information Technology systems experienced outages. At this time all critical systems have been restored and should be operational. In the process of restoring service, several user and common data directories had to be restored from the backup tapes from Thursday evening. Therefore, some of you may be missing data files on your H drive or M drive that you created or modified on Friday. If you have any questions or have any IT related problems, please contact the Resolution Center at x31411 for assistance.

Subject: "Online Trading".

Body: Several things are not very clear to me and I need to run them by you. 1. From your email it appears to me that there would be no legal reason prohibiting your Australian based counterparties from trading all of the products we offer, however, except for financial Australian power, the contracting Enron entity will have to be the party referenced on the particular product. It appears that the only product Credit has currently opened the Australian based counterparties to trade anyway is Australian financial power. 2. Will you be approving the Australian based counterparties for trading? Dave Forster appears to want me to approve Australian based counterparties too, which doesn't make sense to me and Mark Taylor. What are your thoughts on this? I guess EnronOnline just does not want a third Legal contract they are going to have to deal with on an ongoing basis. FYI, I currently do not approve the London based counterparties. 3. The Australian company number. Does that have to go on every confirmation done with an Australian counterparty? If it does we will need to make sure that it gets put on every confirmation. It is my understanding that the confirmations for online trading will be generated from Houston so we will have to provide every company number to the Houston Confirmation Desk. FYI, tomorrow at the end of the day is my drop dead time to get all the counterparies approved, because the information will have to be loaded in by London when they arrive for work Friday morning.

Subject: "CIG's Raton Basin 2002 Expansion Project".

Body: Hello Paul and Mark. FYI: CIG proposes to construct and operate facilities necessary to transport additional volumes of approximately 55 MDth per day of natural gas out of the Raton Basin Area in Colorado and New Mexico. The total cost of the project is $26,896,800 with a proposed rolled-in treatment for the expansion out of the Raton Basin Area. Question - Do you all have any issues that you want us to address in regards to the expansion or will a plain vanilla intervention be fine? The intervention is due Nov. 5th. If you could get to me between now and the early part of next week, that would be great. Melinda

Subject: "Netco meeting today".

Body:
I know we have moved this meeting already, but since I have very little info ( only what I read on Yahoo!) I think we should wait till next week to meet. So I am going to cancel. I have given Leslie, Jeff , Stacey and Rita, Enron BUCKS cards. Make them buy you a drink. Let me know if you hear anything. Thanks for you patients and continued understanding. bob