Martin, Subsequent to my last e-mail I discovered an additional detail which may po= ssibly clarify why ENCE prefers to purchase the Chilean E. globulus species= to the Brazilian species for pulp production. It would appear that the E.= globulus species holds up better than the various Brazilian species during= the refining process. While most papermakers generally don't refine hardw= oods and softwoods with the same equipment, many smaller European mills are= unable to afford the capital investment of a second refiner and accordingl= y do use a single refiner for all grades. This is particularly true of the= Italian mills. Since hardwoods cannot withstand the rigorous refining req= uired for softwoods without losing their papermaking characteristics (opaci= ty, etc. ), these papermakers need to utilize the hardwood species best suit= ed for this type of processing. Accordingly, the globulus species (which i= s also the predominant species in the Iberian peninsula) holds up much bett= er under this type of heavy refining than any other species of eucalyptus. In any case, I hope this helps shed additional light on this issue, and, as= always, please feel free to revert with any questions you might have. Tha= nks. Karen
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Eucalyptus Pulp - Final Note
Hope are things in London? I have seen Beth Apollo at two meetings in Texas recently, one in Dallas and one in San Antonio. We have been making the Texas circuit -- not quite as exciting as your travels.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Stephanie is coming to Houson!
The Gas Spec (Oil NG Hedge) book will show a MTD variance of $819,000 today. When the Power p&l was added to this book last week the formulas did not divide by 1,000. Therefore the incorrect p&l was reported. However, John Lavorato was given a corrected report, so this variance will not be included in today's daily p&l on the NGP&L. If you have any questions feel free to give me a call. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: NGP&L Variance
Attached is the preliminary CA monthly report for December for your review. Please verify the following: TK - The rates under Item 1 (especially those highlighted in pink, which I updated manually by reviewing invoices/transactional reports) Darrell - The operational capacity and footnotes under Item 3 Terry - The scheduled and/or nominated volumes under Item 1 and 3 (I've done some cross-validations checks but another pair of eyes will help) Jeanette - Overall data and format for accuracy Please provide any comments to me no later than COB Monday, 1/21/02, for updates. Once finalized, I will email to the full distribution list. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Transwestern FERC California Monthly Report - Dec 2001 (Preliminary)