Detailed Instructions: In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
Problem:the working title for no looking back was long time , nothing new , and rarely has there been a more apt name for a motion picture .
even though this movie clocks in at a relatively skinny 96 minutes , it seems to run long enough to engulf two titanics .
writer / director edward burns has trotted out a hackneyed storyline , the trajectory of which will be instantly recognizable to anyone who has n't spent their life in seclusion .
instead of tweaking the formula a little to invigorate the proceedings , burns is content to allow the film to ramble aimlessly towards its irritatingly predictable conclusion , offering precious few momentary pleasures along the way .
no looking back is dominated by three very dislikable characters whose constant presence on the screen is painful .
the most appropriate ending would have been a triple suicide , and the sooner , the better .
alas
, that 's not the case , and those who stick with this film for its entire length will be forced to endure the prolonged company of this wretched trio .
and , to further depress audiences
, burns has shot the entire film on cold , rainy days in a gray new york state beach town .
peeks of sunshine are few and far between .
no wonder the characters are all so miserable .
first of all , we have charlie ( burns ) , a generation x slacker who abandoned his girlfriend three years ago after she had an abortion , then spent some time bumming around in california before deciding to come home .
that girlfriend is claudia ( lauren holly ) , and , after picking up the pieces of her life following charlie 's departure , she has moved on , shacking up with one of charlie 's old school buddies , mike ( jon bon jovi ) .
the two have a comfortable relationship , but it 's apparent to even a blind person that they 're not right for each other .
claudia years for some spice in her life ; mike wants to settle down and have children .
then charlie re - enters the mix .
so who , if anyone , will claudia end up with ? who cares ? ?
no looking back goes to extraordinary lengths to make sure that we 're not especially interested in the outcome of the romantic triangle .
so what if no one finds happiness -- these characters do n't deserve it anyway , especially after wasting 90 minutes of our time .
they are n't real people -- they 're a writer 's construct stumbling through a too - obvious storyline .
they should know the ending as well as we do .
and burns should have given his audience more credit and presented them with a plot that at least offered a surprise or two .
another frustrating thing about no looking back is that burns has populated the film with a group of potentially - interesting supporting characters .
blythe danner is solid as claudia 's housebound mother , connie britton is suitably high - strung as claudia 's neurotic sister , and jennifer esposito is eye - catching as a bartender in search of a little romance .
sadly , all we get is quick glimpses into their lives , although a movie about any of them would have been far more intriguing than the story burns has chosen to tell .
none of the lead performers are going to wow critics with their thespian attributes .
edward burns is pushing the edge of his limited range here .
jon bon jovi shows more acting ability than one might reasonably expect from a singer branching into a different career , but he could still use a little polish .
the worst case is lauren holly , who presents a completely bland claudia .
as portrayed here , she 's hardly the kind of woman who would inspire even a moment 's interest , not to mention undying love .
burns ' ex , the monumentally untalented maxine bahns , would have been hard - pressed to do a less inspired job .
when he released the brothers mcmullen , edward burns was revered as the wunderkind of the 1995 sundance film festival ( robert redford has apparently stuck with him -- the aging actor / director executive produced this mess ) .
two films and three short years later , the luster has faded .
some movie makers have only one good film in them . with back- to - back duds
like she 's the one and no looking back to follow the delightful brothers , burns is beginning to look like a member of that undistinguished club .
Solution:
N