In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example input: Comment: Damn! Another cloudy day, and it's all Obama's doing!
Example output: Obscene
Example explanation: This is obscenity because it hints on sexual content that is offensive to the public sense of decency.
Q: Comment: Bill Boyd, on the faculty at the University of Hawaii West Oahu, posted the following comment on an article by Ian Lind on Honolulu Civil Beat 4/29/15: "The main use of Mauna Kea prior to 1778 was as a quarry and adze manufacturer. Most of the shrines there are connected to the quarry. It is the main feature at the summit and runs seven and one half miles. ... adzes in various stages of production, chips, refuse from the production. When I first saw it I thought it was a 20 th century mining operation because of the refuse. The positioning of the shrines around the quarry indicate that the spiritual activity on Mauna Kea was related to the quarry. Workers homes, and garbage dumps (middens) are there. Indicating it was commoners doing the mining and manufacture. ... native Hawaiians placed the largest mine and adze factory in ... a sacred precinct and operated it for a thousand years." Give it up Thomas. The presence of small worker/household shrines does not make a place sacred.
A:
Non-obscene