In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Ummm NO! But nice way to frame your answer so no matter what we say against this utter bullshit..you can shake your head in phoney support like "its ok we know you cant say cuz your man is holding you down". That in itself is enough to not vote for your corrupt ass because basically your saying im weak! Ide like to get these weak hands around your neck if that says anything.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: Martin Cizmar, You're a douche. Like a huge douche. Damn dude, Stop being such an enormous douche. Seriously. Calm down. You're such a god damn douche.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: I stated some opinions, and you labeled them "demands". You included things that I had not mentioned, but ascribed those opinions to me. That's not what I describe as civil conversation , but .....
I am a progressive, but I do not speak on behalf of " those who call themselves progressive". I don't know of any "demands that any of us have made of the Church. I have not heard of any group of us calling to have no Pope.
Quite frankly, I don't worry about when it is a mortal or venial sin to engage in sex outside of marriage, because that is not something in which I engage. I mostly worry about my own sins and shortcomings. Categorizing the sins of others is something that I consider to be above my pay grade.
Example Output:
Non-obscene