Question: Sentence A: going to effect too many

Sentence B: It is going to effect way too many people when it passes.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Gordon thwarted him by slowing down so Earnhardt couldn't get enough distance to find an angle and shoot past him.
Gordon sped up so Earnhardt couldn't find a way past him.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
At the time, Walsh was trying to get Weinberger to rat out Bush in exactly the same way Starr reportedly is trying to get Susan McDougal to finger Clinton.

Here is a hypothesis:
Walsh tried to bribe Weinberger into ratting out Bush.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: That was before we killed their king and broke their spirit in the wars twelve years ago.

Sentence 2: The king was killed fighting for his people.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
but we don't we're not intervening in that or do you think that we are to the degree that we are causing

Does it follow that "How are we affecting things?"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "He believes that trauma research requires multi-disciplinary input and that research by non-MDs is taken seriously.", can we conclude that "He believes that trauma research should get more funding for non-MDs."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell