Ken Bentsen deserves your thanks and a note or a phone call from you. (see below for phone number and address). I called Congressman Bentsen yesterday to express the Partnership's support on the Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) bill. Yesterday, the bill passed in Congress by one vote (215 to 214). Ken Bentsen's vote made the difference. When I spoke with him, he told me how difficult it would be for him to make that vote, and that he had been lobbied hard by the labor unions, the Cabinet and the President. I urged him to vote for the bill and told him what the impact would be to Houston and the region*. In the final analysis, the bill passed thanks to your fellow Houstonian
Answer: Congressman Bentsen and the Trade Promotion Authority
Hi Ben, Hope Day 1 of your daughter's illustrious academic career went well. We are hoping to meet tomorrow at 130 Central in 38C2 to discuss GE issues. Sheila says you won't be here quite that soon, but it would be very helpful if you could join us once you get here. Time permitting, we can discuss the ESA transaction once we are done with the GE stuff. See you soon, Kay
Answer: GE meeting
On behalf of EOTT, an environmental records review was completed for a block of Koch crude oil pipeline assets located in south Texas. There were no issues or environmental deficiencies identified during the review. A due diligence was recommended to verify confirmation of the housekeeping activities presented in the records review. The air permit modification for the La Plata C/S was received from the state of Colorado. This modification allows for additional emissions and fuel use as a result of a change in gas quality supplies in the San Juan basin.
Answer: Weekly Report, Roswell Area
Russell, Please review the attached draft of the draft Enfolio Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement which has been drafted based on Exxon's comments as necessary changes before they will allow the Mobil plant to schedule gas under the terms of the October 1, 1995 Agreement. I have merely incorporated the credit language that was used in the October 1, 1995 agreement into this agreement and have attempted to make the other changes that Exxon was requesting. Question, is the parent company still Mobil Corp. for the purposes of the MAC. Do you still agree with the prior credit requirements as provided in the October 1, 1995 agreement, and if not, please provide me with your updated requirements as early as possible this morning so that I can incorporate into the agreement prior to presenting it to them for further negotiation later today. Lee, Please review the attached so that we can discuss which of their changes have been made, which we did not make and the reasons therefor. The quick points being: sentence at end of 2.3 which takes the place of their items 1-4; $0.15 to $0.05 in 3.2 and 3.4; item (iii) in 4.2 per their request #5 except I changes 30 business days to simply 30 days; I did not give them their request #6 except I did incorporate the last two sentences of their request; I attempted to give them all of their requested #7 except I reworded slightly for balance and the items we previously discussed; did not do request #8 because we will incorporate that in the Transaction Agreement; gave them their request #9, gave them their request #10 except I left in the "as is, where is" and the line they omitted when they retyped; did not do their item #11, added section 8.9 for termination of prior agreement; added their items #12 and #13 but modified as we discussed; otherwise I updated the contract and changed references for Buyer's Transporter to simply Company. Anything else? .
Answer:
Mobil Oil Corporation Master Enfolio Agreement