In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: The Booker, and all the laurels, are about my past, not my future, says this ace of the apothegm. Choices: 1. All of these laurels talk about past experiences dealing with romance. 2. The Booker and all the laurels are about my future. 3. All of the laurels are about the past of this ace of the apothegm.

Ex Output:
2

Ex Input:
Statement: like up at the end of last year where one police officer it was on a drug raid uh was trying to extra extricate um a confession or information from a drug dealer and did so by placing a hot a hot iron on his chest his bare chest burned him Choices: 1. A police officer tried to extricate a confession from a drug dealer by placing a hot iron on his chest. 2. The drug dealer was not harmed by the police officer. 3. A police officer caught a drug dealer on a drug raid.

Ex Output:
2

Ex Input:
Statement: But the Bronx alone refused, saying that Legal Services lawyers might be forced to answer to LSNY's funders rather than focus exclusively on their clients' interests. Choices: 1. The Legal Services lawyers support the objections raised by The Bronx. 2. The Bronx was concerned about lawyers not being able to focus entirely on the interest of their clients. 3. The Bronx was only one of many boroughs to refuse.

Ex Output:
3