An athlete and another player does not constitute as a crowd of people. An athlete grabbing another player would not be in a restaurant.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "An athlete who is covered in dirt grabs onto the jersey of player number 30." that "A crowd of people are ordering food at a restaurant."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no
Looking at merchandise at a jewelry kiosk is a form of shopping.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "Three people are looking at merchandise of a jewelry kiosk." can we conclude that "The people were shopping."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes
The players cannot be both playing hockey and playing basketball at the same time.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "Three basketball players in white are defending against the attacking player with the ball in orange." can we conclude that "They are playing hockey."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
Performing a trick over a wall doesn't imply being flipped upside down over it.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A bicyclist performing a trick over a heavily graffitied wall."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A cyclist is flipped upside down over a wall." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
The group cannot be at a mall and outdoor concert at the same time.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "A group of people congregate at a mall." is it true that "A group of people are at an outdoor concert."?
no
Two women can not be at a Chinese convenience store and swimming in a lake at the same time.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "Two women looks over an item at a chinese convenience store."
Hypothesis: "Two women swimming in a lake."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
no