instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: More "FAKE NEWS" from the Trump administration regarding the player's peaceful protests.

Pence and Trump should stick to things they actually understand, for instance the reasoning behind the protest in Charlottesville, last night.

The only reason Pence was there was so he could walk out in "protest".....what a phoney!
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit

question:
Comment: I don't think it bothers him in the least. The only thing worse than being a sore loser like you would be a sore winner. I'm sure Torque is quite happy to be in the position that he is. Clinton was a weak candidate, and the electoral college did exactly what it was created to do. If only you lefties hadn't sold out Bernie, he probably would have won. hahaha
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit

question:
Comment: This is pathetic, although it's become the norm around here. (Who can forget the drunk who spent hundreds at a strip club before spreading a homeless man all over the street with his car and then falling asleep, only to receive a month or two of probation?) She's got at least one prior DUII (the first one is wiped from the record, so the fact that one is there probably means she has two), she committed hit and run, a felony, and then tried to frame an innocent person. Just how depraved does one have to be to get a prison sentence around here? Perhaps being white and female played roles in this farce.

As far as promising to not drink, how about we follow North Dakota's lead here and put an anklet on her that automatically reports any drinking? Her word seems about as valuable as dirt, so distrust and verify seems in order.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit