In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Obama used Romney's Republican Health care plan. But since Obama was black, the Republicans refused to work with him to reform health care. They have a lot of voters who hate Obama due to his skin colour.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Sounds like McComas had a few priors but the theft was the only prior that left a victim. He might have tried something stupid that angered the cop. Freedom of information absolutely should be available as soon as it is discovered, for anyone to study. I'm not saying the police are corrupt but they do protect each other. What I fear is the concept of "We have conducted a thorough internal investigation and find no wrong doing on the part of the officer"
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Nope, the villain is dead. The lawyer just another liberal pos, who callously added to the victim's pain.
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit