Transmission Customers: Since FERC did not act on our September 11, 2001, PJM West compliance filing (Docket No. RT01-98-000) at its December 19th meeting, Allegheny Power (AP) will need to delay the start of the PJM West arrangement until March 1, 2002. In order to accommodate the further delay in the start date, AP will need to sell transmission service under the AP OATT and on the AP OASIS for the month of February 2002. To accomplish this, AP will do the following: * AP will attempt to call the Transmission Customers that have "confirmed" point-to-point transmission service reservations on the PJM OASIS for the paths that are not currently valid for PJM (AEP and DLCO) by 4:30 p.m. on December 21 to determine if they need comparable service on the AP system. If that is the case, AP will honor the "confirmed" reservations and the PJM OASIS timestamps. * Yearly service that was not given the option to exercise roll-over rights on the PJM paths (AP to PJM and PJM to AP) will be given the option to extend that service through the month of February. AP will attempt to call these Transmission Customers by 4:30 p.m. on December 21. * ATCs for the month of February will be uploaded to the AP OASIS starting at 8 a.m. on December 24. The upload will include all valid AP paths (AEP, PJM, VAP, FE and DLCO). * Transmission Marketing will post a message on the OASIS when the ATC upload is started and when it is complete. * Transmission service beyond March 1, 2002, will continue to be sold by PJM per the Interim Coordination Agreement that was filed with FERC on February 12, 2001. * January 30, 2002, is the last scheduled FERC meeting in January. If FERC does not act on our filing at that time, the start of the PJM West arrangement may then be delayed until April 1, 2002. Further information will be provided at that time, if necessary.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: PJM West Implementation Delay to March 1, 2002
Please redraft the New Power September activity. I'm looking for the deals shown below AND there should be a demand charge of $892,040.00 on deal 377245 and a demand of $624,028.00 on deal 381811. If you see the items above, please send me a new worksheet. Thanks
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: New Power Deals
6/7/2001 Thurs Notice: If any clients or potential clients that are getting duplicate e-mails just reply to this, and let us know and we will remove the extra recaps. If anyone feels that they may be receiving these in error please kindly reply to have you removed from the list and we are sorry for any trouble we caused you. IF ANYONE WHO DID NOT GET THE "PDF" FILE ATTACHMENT SHOWING THE THREE YEAR LONG TERM NUMBERS AND FULL CFTC DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT PLEASE E-MAIL OR CALL TOLL FREE (800) 773-1713 AND WE WILL RESEND IT RIGHT AWAY Here were todays trades "Swing" S/P full size S 1282.00 open trade 6/6 b 1275.00 close trade 6/7 JUNE +7.0=$1,750.00
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: trades forTurs 6/7
To all whom it may concern: I keep receiving such unsolicited messages (please, see below) that represent an obvious scam. Is there any way to block out the messages from this source? I assume other employees of Enron are also being hit. Vince Kaminski
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Investment