Question: No, we're not.
We are not.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
only significant structures that have an operating use (such as, a recently constructed hotel or employee housing block) shall be treated as general PP and E by identifying the cost attributable to general PP and E and segregating it from the cost of the stewardship land acquired.

Here is a hypothesis:
A recently constructed hotel would not be a significant structure with an operating use.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Whatever you call it, Saint-Martin as the French do, or Sint Maarten with the Dutch, it is part of both the French West Indies and the Netherlands' Antilles.

Sentence 2: It has a French name; Saint-Martin, as well as a Dutch name; Sint Maarten.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
The plan also calls for the elimination of the Mayor's Office of Contracts, which would save $1.

Does it follow that "The elimination of the Mayor's Office of Contracts would save $100."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If and uh this guy was going nuts and his uh son built him a garage and got him some uh oh i don't know what the equipment's called but planes and thi ngs, can we say that "This guy was going berserk and his son built him a garage and got him some equipment to do with planes and things."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Question: Szary to the manager!
Szary, to the worker drone!
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no