Q: If 51 A review of state statutes, including those of the District of Columbia, revealed that 38 states have a provision that allows third-party payors to issue policies that deny payment for injuries sustained while intoxicated., can we say that "No matter the cause of an accident or injury, third party payers will always pay the medical expenses under the insurance plan. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"The FDA has concluded that the rule will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities and an initial regulatory flexibility analysis and final regulatory flexibility analysis have been prepared and included in the notice of proposed rulemaking and the final rule notice, respectively, as required by sections 603 and 604."
Hypothesis: The FDA still has not come up with any conclusions.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: They pushed into the crowd who pushed back. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"They were pushing back and forth with the crowd during the battle."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "well i tell you the way people are driving nowadays i'm surprised we're not killing more people than we are", can we conclude that "I think that the government should put more money into driving safety campaigns."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: 1. Effluent Samples

Sentence B: They wanted to show what was already in progress.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Miss Howard was obviously quite a public character.

Sentence B: Miss Howard was demure and quiet, keeping to herself.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no