Problem: Having 11 directors on the board of management nominated from the private sector by the provinces and territories will ensure that the agency continues to operate in a cost effective and responsive manner as would the other accountability mechanisms built into the legislation before this House.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Having 11 directors on the board ensures that the agency costs more money than necessary "?

A: No

Problem: Donald Berry, a professor of biostatistics at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center who was not involved in the study, told The Associated Press in an email that he believes the report is more accurate than the one released by Harvard investigators in May that estimated up to 4,600 more deaths than usual occurred.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Donald Berry has been to a hospital"?

A: Yes

Problem: But you -- under your intermediate scrutiny test we would not be hypothesizing what might have been in Congress's mind. Your First Amendment test is a stringent one. You have to have an important purpose, and the means that you use is necessarily tied to that purpose. If you take that position, I don't see how you make the retroactive-prospective line work.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "purpose is not necessary for this position"?

A:
No