Question: Sentence A: In addition, a nation can invest more in domestic capital than it saves by borrowing from other countries.

Sentence B: The amount a nation is able to invest in domestic capital is capped by the savings of that nation.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Does this constitute an independent argument for taxing pollution, quite aside from its environmental payoff?
In regards to the taxation, will the environment get better
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
For a change, it's not something that Napoleon looted during a campaign, but was a gift from Mohammed Ali, viceroy of Egypt.

Here is a hypothesis:
For a change it came from the Viceroy of Egypt.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Assuming inflation remains at current rates through 2001, almost $450 million is required in FY01 to maintain the purchasing power (and services) of the FY95 level.

Sentence 2: There was no measurable inflation between 1995 and 2001.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
I felt as if I was the mother of Smurfs.

Does it follow that "I felt so disconnected from all of the Smurfs."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "With material of infinite strength--and an infinite supply of it--and with infinite time and patience, it might have been worth considering.", can we conclude that "It might be worth thinking about if there was a an infinite supply of infinitely strong material. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes