Problem: Here is a premise:
so you would

Here is a hypothesis:
What if you didn't?

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Wade had ended differently, argues Largent, the United States would have 23 million more taxpayers to pay as we go.

Sentence 2: Because of Wade ending, not many people will be paying taxes.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
The new religion of India is of course modernization, and young, upwardly mobile professionals are everywhere.

Does it follow that "Modren India consists of young and mobile professionals."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If how how terrible that is yeah how terrible that is so we'll have to we'll have to keep our eyes on all that i guess, can we say that "i suppose we can forget about that issue now and focus on other things"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"but you need to rent the first one first"
Hypothesis: Before renting anything else, start with the first one.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: The original route cannot be precisely followed because the Herodian city of Jesus's time was destroyed by Rome in a.d. 70; it was rebuilt in a.d. 135 by the Roman Emperor Hadrian with a different town plan and pattern of streets, making accurate identification of sites in the earlier city difficult.

Sentence 2: The original route is hard to follow correctly.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes