Given a passage, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

Example Input: Humans can easily restore a speech signal that is temporally masked by an interfering sound (e.g., a cough masking parts of a word in a conversation), and listeners have the illusion that the speech continues through the interfering sound. This perceptual restoration for human speech is affected by prior experience. Here we provide evidence for perceptual restoration in complex vocalizations of a songbird that are acquired by vocal learning in a similar way as humans learn their language.', "European starlings were trained in a same/different paradigm to report salient differences between successive sounds. The birds' response latency for discriminating between a stimulus pair is an indicator for the salience of the difference, and these latencies can be used to evaluate perceptual distances using multi-dimensional scaling. For familiar motifs the birds showed a large perceptual distance if discriminating between song motifs that were muted for brief time periods and complete motifs. If the muted periods were filled with noise, the perceptual distance was reduced. For unfamiliar motifs no such difference was observed.
Example Output: Does stimulus familiarity affect perceptual restoration in the European starling ( Sturnus vulgaris )?

Example Input: Dyspnoea is a threatening sensation of respiratory discomfort that presents many similarities with pain. Experimental dyspnoea in healthy subjects induces analgesia. This 'dyspnoea-pain counter-irritation' could, in reverse, imply that relieving dyspnoea in patients with chronic respiratory diseases would lower their pain thresholds.", 'We first determined pressure pain thresholds in 25 healthy volunteers (22-31years; 13 men; handheld algometer), during unloaded breathing (BASELINE) and during inspiratory threshold loading (ITL). Two levels of loading were used, adjusted to induce dyspnoea self-rated at 60% or 80% of a 10cm visual analogue scale (ITL6 and ITL8). 18 patients with chronic respiratory failure due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) were then studied during unassisted breathing and after 30 and 60min of non-invasive ventilation-NIV30 and NIV60-(same dyspnoea evaluation).', 'In healthy volunteers, pressure pain thresholds increased significantly in the deltoid during ITL6 (p<0.05) and ITL8 (p<0.05) and in the trapezius during ITL8 (p<0.05), validating the use of pressure pain thresholds to study dyspnoea-pain counter-irritation. In patients with ALS, the pressure pain thresholds measured in the deltoid during unassisted breathing decreased by a median of 24.5%-33.0% of baseline during NIV30 and NIV60 (p<0.05).
Example Output: Does relieving dyspnoea by non-invasive ventilation decrease pain thresholds in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis?

Example Input: Hypotension increases mortality after all types of injuries. Prior studies comparing mortality of hypotensive traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients to normotensive TBI patients have implied that hypotension is particularly detrimental after TBI. It is unknown whether hypotension affects TBI patients more severely than it affects other types of patients. We hypothesized that hypotension does not increase mortality in TBI patients more than it does in non-TBI patients.', 'National Trauma Data Bank (1994-2002) patients aged 18 to 45 years with blunt mechanisms of injury treated at Level I and Level II centers were included. Deaths occurring before 24 hours were excluded. Logistic regression was used to measure the association between hypotension (< or =90 mm Hg) and death after adjusting for confounding variables of age, gender, comorbidities, complications, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and severity of associated injuries. Odds ratios (95% confidence interval) indicate the risk of death in hypotensive patients in each group compared with normotensive patients in the same group.', 'The study population consisted of 79,478 patients (TBI, 30,742; no TBI, 48,736). Hypotension independently quadrupled the risk of death after adjusting for confounding variables (odds ratio [OR], 4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-5.6). However, increase in this risk associated with hypotension was the same in TBI (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 3.5-4.9) and non-TBI patients (OR, 4.6; 95% CI, 3.4-6.0). Furthermore, the relationship between hypotension and TBI did not change with increasing head Abbreviated Injury Scale score severity.
Example Output:
Does hypotension increase mortality in brain-injured patients more than it does in non-brain-injured Patients?