Question: Sentence A: In the fall of 1995, none other than Henry Kissinger--the author of the secret incursion into Cambodia that prompted the War Powers Act--asserted that Clinton must obtain clear and unambiguous congressional backing before sending troops to Bosnia.

Sentence B: In the summer of 1997, someone other than Henry Kissinger asserted that Clinton doesn't have to obtain clear congressional backing before sending troops to Bosnia.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: and i'll bet they don't i'll bet you don't i i would imagine legitimate gun dealers you'd have background checks but i'll bet if somebody goes in and offers a pawnshop guy some money for a gun
I'm betting if you offer someone at a pawnshop money they'll sell you a gun without a permit.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
I'm not sure how to apply competitive-market theory to Whitewater, but fortunately there is no lack of additional scandals to analyze.

Here is a hypothesis:
I can tell you exactly how to apply the competitive-market theory to Whitewater.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: The man grinned with sharp bloody teeth as he drew out Jon's rapier from his chest and threw it on the ground.

Sentence 2: The man was missing all of his teeth.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
But he didn't want a joke.

Does it follow that "He was not in the mood for jokes."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "That assumption may or may not be correct.", can we conclude that "That assumption can only be correct."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no