Question: In other words, the questions he got from reporters focused on politics and positioning to the total exclusion of his actual policies and positions.
He received questions on politics and positioning instead of questions on actual policies and positions yet it was still very informative.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
So what if all the negatives are lost?

Here is a hypothesis:
It's not a big deal if all the negatives are lost.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: In the Washington Post , Archer accuses Democrats of supporting big government on autopilot and argues that the cuts epitomize compassionate conservatism.

Sentence 2: Some people think that all Democrats want the largest government possible.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Center for Budget and Policy Priorities.

Does it follow that "Center for spending without policies "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If In actual fact, I was just trying to find something that might have survived., can we say that "I was looking for something that might have survived."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Question: The agonized expression on his face looks like a kind of rapture.
The expression on his face depicts rapture.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes