I have received the list of CES agreements which George put together as having Texas delivery points and have been attempting to put together a back to back agreement similar to the back to back agreement which ENA has with CES; however, I keep running into confidentially agreement problems. I understand that these CES agreements relate to June business and have no deals and/or term beyond that point. I suggest that the deliveries under these agreements be documented as a GTC Confirmation between ENA and HPL and thus avoid the confidentiality agreement problems. George Weissman and Bob Hall feel that this is a workable solution. We will proceed with the preparation of GTC's for each deal unless I hear otherwise.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: CES - counterparty contracts with Texas delivery points
IN: This is an email
Jim Bouillion of CRM and Gary Cooney of McGriff, Seibels (our insurance broker) asked that I raise three matters with you: 1. Scheduling of a meeting with the D & O carriers' counsel; 2. Obtaining additional D & O coverage; and, 3. Defense counsel selection in light of the possible "advise of counsel" defense and subrogation rights of the carriers. I know that you are covered up, but I would not expect discussion of these issues to take more than 15 minutes. I will wait to hear form you or Steph. Thanks.

What is the subject?

OUT:
Securities Litigation -- D & O Carriers