In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: All I want is equal rights under the law. This country has never achieved that goal. Do you support the police murdering unarmed black folks including children? Do you enjoy being a beneficiary of that racist violence? Do you think killing a 12 year old holding an air rifle in a playground is justified? The cop that shot him was fired for lying on his job application, not murder. He is still free. How many white folks murdered by black people for political purposes would you tolerate? How many centuries of that violence would you tolerate? What would you do to stop the killing? Would peaceful protest work for you as your response? Would mere suspicion of you having a gun justify a cop killing you?

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Apparently my visceral reaction to this guano was not considered civil. Whatever. Hard to figure out what that means in respect to a "man" who refers to a woman as a "hole".

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: The comments in this thread read like the comments of 2nd Amendment folks. It is complete fealty to the NRA/LaPierre's view of gun rights or else. Uber-libertarianism man, it's going to sink us in every way. The funny thing is that this individual would have zero involvement in abortion politics as mayor and has said he supports Roe v. Wade. No, it's not enough. For the leaders of the DNC and the plurality of folks on this blog, there is no nuance. Any question as to whether there should be any restrictions on abortion is met with scorn. "They're going to take our guns!!!" "They're trying to control our bodies!!!" Two peas in a pod.

A:
Non-identity-attack
****