In this task, you are given product reviews about dvds. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive(the reviewer is satisfied) or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative(the reviewer is not satisfied).
--------
Question: Why did I buy this trash? . Poltegeist is the worst DVD set that I ever purchased. The plots are the most ridiculous and amateurish that I have ever encountered. Characters have no clear delineation, they hover over any terrain that the writers hoist on them. Contradictions and sheer lunacy are admitted into the script if the story demands it. Characters who are sceptical one minute, suddenly swing wildly into occult belief full of knowledge of mystical arcana. The actors try to make this schmaltz work, however, at times their faces, confused at the blatant absurdity of the script, collapse into pseudo profound baffoonery. Ludicrous coincidences dominate the plot to such an extent that you cannot even expel didainful laughter. This show is not even a "turkey" because the sheer stupidity of the script elicits revulsion of such a sharp quality that you can only dream of smashing the DVD's with a hammer to eleviate the loathing that overwhelms your mind while wasting your life watching this dross. This show is so awful, I couldn't give it away as a present for the justified fear that the recipient would promptly end our dear friendship due to the insult of unloading this manure to their dwelling. Ugh! Avoid this show like the pox.

Answer: NEG

Question: Promising Debut . Small town America... only this isn't the pleasant and white-picketed small town America of film noir fame, it's the gray and colorless small town America of neo-noir, and there's the man on the sidewalk looking like a lost bum to prove it. A bum who's being approached by that famous "Man in a Black Trenchcoat"... Hard Eight (AKA Sydney, but I've yet to see a version of it anywhere that actually claims that title) is a debut pretty much as promising as Blood Simple to the brothers Coen. Paul Thomas Anderson immediately sets out to give us only the best, with actors he wants to make famous and a script that has characters doing almost nothing we want (or expect) them to do, but who yet remain completely sympathetic throughout. Anderson also uses neo-noir color to great effect, allowing red and blue to do what harsh black and white contrast is supposed to do in classical noir. That said, Anderson still knows where the majority of the talent lies, and despite the long takes and steady-cam shots that would develop into those dizzying long takes from later movies, he focuses most of his time on the characters' faces, and just lets them be. If he hadn't already done the amazing and always stunning later work of Magnolia, Boogie Nights, and Punch Drunk Love, I'd say that this is a "promising debut that makes me impatient for the next Anderson picture to come out," but since he does now have four classics notched into his belt, I must say, "See this to see Anderson at his roots," and "Man I can't wait for his next feature!" --PolarisDi

Answer: POS

Question: Room 101 Revisited . After expecting "The English Patient, Part VI" We were pleasantly surprised to see Ralph Fiennes head off into uncharted waters. A dark blend of "Nineteen Eighty-Four" and "Brazil" emerges in a fully-formed recreation of the Stalinist revolutionary state, with subreferences to practically every dictator who graced the Twentieth Century. Donald Sutherland has a chance to shine in a fabulous Castro-esque (the early years) beard, and We were also highly impressed with Lara Flynn Boyle, and Tom Hollander as the son-turned-heir, an unfortunate dictatorial truth still being played out in North Korea. Mr. Hollander was suitably portrayed as a short man next to the leggy Boyle, and the 1950s Peronist costumes set an appropriate tone. Draw whatever conclusions you will from the film's final scenes- they are the results of torture and re-education camps- but many Russian, Cuban, Argentinian, North Korean, Chinese, Afghani, Italian, Cambodian, George Orwellian dissidents would agree that "Land of the Blind" is a superbly accurate and ironic piece of work.

Answer:
POS