Premise: Meanwhile, Jones' lawyers foolishly cooperated by grumbling that Starr was shadowing them and hijacking their investigation of Lewinsky.

Hypothesis: Starr was accused of hijacking the investigation of Lewinsky.
Answer: yes

Premise: oh that's fantastic

Hypothesis: That's no good.
Answer: no

Premise: It is well understood that when there are two reasonable constructions for a statute, yet one raises a constitutional question, the Court should prefer the interpretation which avoids the constitutional issue.

Hypothesis: The court should prefer the interpretation which adheres to the constitutional issue.
Answer: no

Premise: Arrow's goal was to eliminate such anomalies with a more sophisticated voting system.

Hypothesis: Arrow's goal was to destroy the voting system.
Answer: no