In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: And yet ANOTHER angry white guy mass slaughters. Maybe Mexico should build a wall to keep white dudes out.
[A]: Identity-attack

[Q]: Comment: Someone is staying busy deleting posts that are perfectly acceptable but don't agree with this article. It's hilarious and pathetic at the same time that people who write these opinions, are so thin skinned that they cannot accept that other people have a difference of opinion and can't deal with the fact that their words are not treated like they came down from God.
[A]: Non-identity-attack

[Q]: Comment: To dwell on sexuality alone, as Hefner mostly did, with nods to women's equality, narrows the cause to self-interest. To build an empire essentially on religious bashing and specialized strategy to make consumerism OK doesn't rank among my great movements of history.Ken Briggs Neither does the dysfunctional hierarchy, busy covering up sexual abuses. For all of that "God is with us" (Zechariah 8:23). The time will come, and is now here, when people will say, as the cultural pendulum swings back toward center, "Let us go with you, for we have heard that God is with you" (Zechariah 8:23). "He resolutely determined to journey to Jerusalem" (Luke 9:51), as must all the Faithful in every age and at every time. Liturgy of the Word, Reading 456, Monday of the Twenty-Sixth Week in Ordinary Time I.
[A]:
Non-identity-attack