Q: Susan, I am busy this morning. Can we do this early this afternoon, say at 1:30? Also can you please send an email to my supervisor Chris Constantine and our main business user Bjorn Hagelmann to outline what the request is. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: Curve mapping
IN: Andy As we discussed during the last conference call, attached is a revised Article 8, Credit Provisions, to the EEI Contract, along with a revised section for the Cover Page. The changes were made to make Article 8 more user friendly and to incorporate the few comments that were agreed to during the conference call. I tried blacklining, but that proved not decipherable due to the extensive formatting changes. Maybe you will have better success. I have attempted to mark by hand the changes and will fax that to you in case you want to distribute it to the rest of the group. The only changes that were not discussed on the call (other than those resulting from the global restructuring) that I made are as follows: 1. Changed the Section entitled "Performance Assurance" to "Collateral Threshold" - Use of PA seemed misleading since PA is referenced in other sections dealing with collateral. 2. Added the words "acceptable to Party ___" in new Section 8.1(d) and 8.2(d)

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Revisions to Article 8 of EEI Contact
IN: This is an email
Johan, Steve: I enjoyed our conference call earlier today. Thank you for describing your eCommerce strategies to me; it sounds like Anglo Platinum may be interested in using eCommerce tools to reach new markets for its products. I look forward to showing you in greater detail how Enron Net Works' applications and tools may help you in this important effort. To move our discussions forward, here are two items I promised to send you during the call: I have secured a guest ID for you on our principal-based eMarketplace, www.enrononline.com. When you get a moment, please log in to the system by visiting the site and using login "BSP45498" and password "AngloPlat" (both are case sensitive). You'll be able to see our main bid/offer page as well as other content. As a guest, you will have read-only access to the system, but this should provide you with a good overview of the site's capabilities. Please feel free to customize the various product views and other displays as you see fit. Also attached to this note is a draft non-disclosure agreement for your review. Please take a look at it and let me know what you think. If you or your attorneys have legal questions or comments on the NDA, please feel free to contact our legal person, Tana Jones, directly at tana.jones@enron.com or at her direct phone number, 1-713-853-3399. Johan, I understand you will be traveling during the next few weeks. I look forward to making contact with you again during the second half of October to discuss next steps in greater detail. If at all possible, please take a quick tour of EnronOnline.com and complete the NDA in the interim so we can hit the ground running when we reconnect in a few weeks. Thanks again for your time today, and I anticipate further productive discussions with you in the weeks ahead.

What is the subject?

OUT: Anglo Platinum -- follow up from today's conference call
QUESTION: I will be stopping by this morning to distribute the pages that were missing from the "Options" section in your Deriviatives I binder. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Missing pages from binder
Bob and I just spoke with Steve Susman. I tried to mention the points you asked. Here are his comments: 1. F&J probably could not simply send us our files back and put itself in a position to be adverse to us with Arthur Anderson. Susman believes that there is a "hot potato" rule that prevents F&J from doing so. 2. That being said, Susman doesn't care if F&J represents Arthur Anderson or anyone else potentially adverse to us in the actions he is handling. 3. Susman would not, however, agree to a broad advance ethical waiver, as proposed by F&J. He does not believe such waivers are effective. Susman would agree to a waiver once we were advised who F&J wanted to represent. I don't know whether F&J would agree to this or not. 4. Susman recognizes that we cannot force F&J to take on the new Mariner matter, and that this is ultimately a risk/benefit decision for us to make, and that we may have to agree to terms that we otherwise wouldn't agree to. Parenthetically, I have received no comments on F&J's proposed waiver letter. Under the circumstances, from his standpoint, Bob is inclined for us to get the best deal on the waiver letter that we can with F&J, but that if F&J won't budge, that we take something along the lines of what they have given us (Bob, let me know if I have mischaracterized your thoughts). From my standpoint, I unfortunately think there are some parts of the letter that we must have changed. This would be to the extent that the letter purports to have Enron Corp. agree to bind all the Enron entities, and to the extent that it involves Enron's agreement to what will happen after the Dynegy merger (as I set out in my earlier e-mail). My recommendation would be, as set forth in my earlier e-mail, that only the Enron entities currently being represented by F&J sign it and be bound by it, and to remove the language regarding what Enron would agree to after the Dynegy merger. I also find the advance ethical waiver language repugnant, but could agree to it if the other modifications mentioned could be made. I do not know whether F&J would be willing to make these changes or not. Our biggest problem right now is time-management. I know that Mariner wanted to make a decision by today as to who to use. I am willing to confer with Dutton ASAP to see what F&J would agree to, and if he can agree in principle, to send him a proposed draft agreement. I believe he is out of the office but is checking his voice-mail. Please let me know what you want me to do. Britt
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: In re F&J Representation
Has the old adversary adopted an "if you can't beat em, join em" strategy? I noticed that CNG is planning to build some high deliverability storage. More competition is always a problem, but at least that is a vindication of the MHP strategy. I noticed Vaina was quoted in the trade press. Is he the man on Tioga now? DF
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
CNG