input question: Gentilello's results had a powerful impact on trauma surgeons because his study was an RCT. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Gentilello's study had a significant impact on trauma surgeons."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "The superficial The even split of many of his assets vindicates her argument and bodes well for corporate wives.", can we conclude that "The assets could not be split."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Writing in the New York Review of Books , Mark Danner has argued that the administration's predilection for tough talk, coupled with its political timidity, did much to make matters worse in Bosnia.

Sentence B: Tough talk coupled with political timidity were the most effective policies for Bosnia.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Board independence does not require the elimination of all inside directors but it would seem to call for ensuring that a super-majority of board members are truly independent both in fact and appearance.
There can be some inside directors on the board, but the majority must be independent for board independence.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
I have heard of you, said the Kal.

Here is a hypothesis:
Kal said he had heard of the person.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question:
Unless Wanamaker was willing to pay double for reaching the right half of the people, his total ad spending would go down and not up.

Does it follow that "Wanamaker has a long list of ads that he wants to put out."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell