In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: Many people associated with the Clintons, supporters and workers alike, met with bizarre and tragic ends. The Clintons are simply criminals with a murderous streak in their behavior. Psychopathic for Bill. Sociopathic for Hillary.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: No one knows how to gauge te outcome based on the ranked ballot. But isn't the challenge greater than that?
Each EDA counts as 100 points and the first candidate to get 16901 points, or more, is the winner. This means that EDA's with a small number of members carry a lot of weight. If one candidate has 28% support concentrated in many EDA's with few members, that candidate ha a much better chance than another candidate with 35% support concentrated in a few ridings in the GTA.
This is the same approach the Liberals used to choose Justin Trudeau. Apparently, he had broad support getting over 80% of the points on the first round. This time around, it seems like a real crap shoot.

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: To be fair, there were a number of statements made by former Justice Robin Camp which, taken as a whole, were deemed to be misconduct. That particular statement, however, has been used out of context. It sounds as if it's an admonishment of the complainant, when it was simply the judge trying to get at the specific facts of the alleged crime.

But your analogy illuminates some of the inconsistencies in this matter. Judges are clearly held to a different standard when they conduct sexual assault trials. The straight-forward question you posed in your example of a car theft trial would raise no eyebrows at all. Yet in a sexual assault trial the consequences are plain to see.

The message being hammered into judges is clear: whether you think the female sexual assault complainant is credible or not, you must question her with kid gloves.

A:
Non-obscene
****