IN: David, I have a problem with the RAC comments made on page #2 of the DASH. Specifically, the two paragraphs basically add no value and just confuse the reader (ie) what is your opinion? Is this a good sale or can significant recovery (on a risk adjusted basis) occur if we convert the sub debt and infuse more equity? Are we not receiving enough value from the CFPC given the possible recovery of this sector? The DASH is deficient in its view of Basic's prospects given current energy prices. Jeff/Dick/Ray, what are your opinions? Independent of the desire to move on - what is the right call - I do not want to give value away in any divestiture or restructuring. Regards

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Basic
IN: This is an email
Mr. Christman: Thank you for your invitation for Dr. Lay to speak at your upcoming forum in France, the format looks wonderful. Unfortunately, Dr. Lay has calendar conflicts and will be unable to participate. If you should need further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Tori Wells Executive Assistant

What is the subject?

OUT: Wall Street Journal Millennium Forum
QUESTION: FYI. As you know, we're attempting to find a solution to the "reasonable review" morrass that's impeding utility forward contracting. For that effort, we've worked with the Portland desk to pull together some educational materials to use with a subset of California stakeholders that's trying to devise a solution to California's melt down. The attached graphs show 3 scenarios for the state as a whole. 1) "do nothing" 2) for 60% of IOU short position, split the amount 50-50 and 1cover half the amount with 10-year fixed priced power and the other half with 5-year fixed priced power. 3) create a portfolio with a) 25% of short position covered by 10-year fixed priced power, b) 20% of short position covered by 5-year fixed price power, c) 15% covered by 1-year fixed price power, d) 20% covered by May-Sept fixed-price power, and e) 15% from the PX. The term of each scenario is 5 years. Because each is priced off our our curves, the average price is roughly equivalent for each of the three portfolios. However, the graph shows (as one would expect) that exposure to price volatility is significantly higher under scenario 1 compared to 2 and 3. The goal is to use the illustrative scenarios to persuade the industry that in the short run (i.e., immediately) the utilities should be permitted to buy a modest amount of power under 5 and 10 terms, and those purchases (if undertaken using a "DealBench-like" tool) ought to be "per se" reasonable.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Illustrative Portfolios
Gerald, Maybe this is what you were looking for - this is the only Fixed Price Election language we use in Confirmations (only Flex Price deals). Please let me know if I can help you further. Regards,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Flex Price Confirmation - Example
Dan, Ref. is made to yr e-mail dated 30th re adjusting ETA Lake Charles to the 9th at latest 0600LT. Please be advised that the vessel is instructed to arrive Lake Charles June 9th 0400lt accordingly. Best regards
Answer: LNG/C"HOEGH GALLEON" - ETA LAKE CHARLES
Q: Joe, just wanted to give you and update on how Payton is. He is growing like a weed, he is now 16lbs and 5 ozs. His hair is getting thicker, I had to trim his hair over his ears because it was getting long enough to tuck it behind his ears He is learning very fast, he can move really well in his walker when he is on smooth flooring and he is praticing everyday to sit up and crawl, it want be long. He still talks alot and never cries, he is such a wonderful baby. He can turn around on his back in a 360 turn and he can roll across the room, if nothing is in his way. Wel, he is ready for me to get him out of his bed, I better go!! He looks forward to visiting with you soon!
Propose a subject line
A:
Payton