Sentence 1: No, that's Julius, explained Tuppence.

Sentence 2: "That's Julius" Tuppence corrected.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
oh hey sure oh absolutely

Does it follow that "Sure, I guess. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If The Court's nondistortion principle is also wrong on the facts, since there is no basis for believing that a504(a)(16), by causing cases [to] be presented by LSC attorneys who [can]not advise the courts of serious questions of statutory validity, ante, at 11, will distort the operation of the courts., can we say that "The non-distortion principal is wrong on the facts."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"Hong Kong's third largest island has a population of only about 12,000; it is still largely undeveloped, and life on Lamma, if not totally primitive, is close to the essentials."
Hypothesis: Lamma is Hong Kong's third largest island.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: In some instances, only one component of a case study may be analyzed in this way. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The complexity of the numbers makes it impossible to analyze a case study this way."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Q: If Only a tiny number of trusted aides and Secret Service agents could know of it., can we say that "Only a few trusted helpers and secret service agents could have knowledge of it."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
yes