In this task, you will be shown a conversation and a question. You need to write an implausible answer to the question. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. "W" and "M" in the conversations stand for "woman" and "man".

Ex Input:
M: Helen,I heard you wanted to be a gym teacher, didn't you? W: Yes, I did think about it. But it was going to be too expensive. M: You mean the training? W: Yes. You need to pay for the use of all the equipment, you know. M: So you went to the nursing college. W: I did, and I have no regrets. M: Really? You enjoyed it? W: Oh, very much. M: Didn't you feel sad that you couldn't become a teacher? W: Well, in a way. But as time went by, I really began to like my job., Question: Why did the woman give up her dream to be a gym teacher?

Ex Output:
She didn't have the equipment.

Ex Input:
W: I didn't think much of that performance. M: No. It wasn't too hot. What a pity, they're a good group after all. W: I couldn't hear the lead singer at all. M: Me neither. The guitars and drums were too bad., Question: What are the speakers talking about?

Ex Output:
A record.

Ex Input:
M: What do you think of Professor Potter's course, Jane? W: Not much. M: Why, what's wrong with it? W: Oh, I don't know. It's just that he overloads it with details. The course he gave on town planning last year, it was just the same-a load of details, which you could have got from a book anyway. There was no overall ... M: No general overview you mean? W: Yes. I suppose you could call it that. I couldn't see the town for the buildings. M: But you've got to have the details in this kind of subject. Anyway I think he's good. You take his first lecture for instance. I thought that was very interesting, and not at all over-detailed. W: Well, he starts off all right, but then he just piles on the details. M: Now you're exaggerating. W: Well, the way he dealt with the Western developments, that wasn't bad, I suppose. M: You seem to have got something. Perhaps Potter is a little disorganized, but I think he's good. W: Do you really think so? M: He does do most of his teaching to the postgraduates. He only does the one undergraduate course each year. After all, I think he tends to forget where he is. He starts off being nice and general and then tries to cram in a bit too much specialized information. W: The main thing I object to is the lack of direction., Question: What is true of Potter's first lecture?

Ex Output:
There was an interesting start and a well-organized end.