Q: If John's face hardened. , can we say that "John was always angry at something. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"this subpart."
Hypothesis: This is a subpart of the law.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: The only housing available was huts or tents, and the roads were generally quagmires. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Since the road were generally quagmires, no vehicles could pass through."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Then the German's voice came up the stairs.", can we conclude that "A German spoke downstairs."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: The rule is issued pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4(i) and (j), 303(r), 308 and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C.

Sentence B: The Communications Act of 1934 was established in 1944.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Sentence A: Montparnasse took over from Montmartre as the haunt of the avant-garde in the 1920s and still stakes a claim.

Sentence B: Montparnasse still stakes a claim as a haunt of the avant-garde.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes