Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
Example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Output: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

New input case for you: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Telephone Slamming Prevention Act of
1998''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS OF PROTECTIONS AGAINST UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES OF
PROVIDERS OF TELEPHONE SERVICE.

(a) Clarification of Verification Procedures.--Subsection (a) of
section 258 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 258) is
amended to read as follows:
''(a) Prohibition.--
''(1) In general.--No telecommunications carrier shall
submit or execute a change in a subscriber's selection of a
provider of telephone exchange service or telephone toll
service except in accordance with this section and such
verification procedures as the Commission shall prescribe.
''(2) Verification.--The procedures prescribed by the
Commission to verify a subscriber's selection of a telephone
exchange service or telephone toll service provider shall--
''(A) preclude the use of negative option letters
of agency as a verification method; and
''(B) require the retention of the verification of
a subscriber's selection in such manner and form and
for such time as the Commission considers
appropriate.''.
(b) Liability for Charges.--Subsection (b) of such section is
amended--
(1) by striking ''(b) Liability for Charges.--Any
telecommunications carrier'' and inserting the following:
''(b) Liability for Charges.--
''(1) In general.--Any telecommunications carrier'';
(2) by designating the second sentence as paragraph (3) and
inserting at the beginning of such paragraph, as so designated,
the following:
''(3) Construction of remedies.--''; and
(3) by inserting after paragraph (1), as designated by
paragraph (1) of this subsection, the following:
''(2) Subscriber payment option.--
''(A) In general.--A subscriber whose telephone
exchange service or telephone toll service is changed
in violation of the procedures prescribed under
subsection (a) may elect to pay the carrier previously
selected by the subscriber for any such service
received after the change in full satisfaction of
amounts due from the subscriber to the carrier
providing such service after the change.
''(B) Payment rate.--Payment for service under
subparagraph (A) shall be at the rate for such service
charged by the carrier previously selected by the
subscriber concerned.''.
(c) Additional Penalties.--Such section is further amended by
adding at the end the following:
''(c) Civil Penalties.--
''(1) In general.--Unless the Commission determines that
there are mitigating circumstances, any telecommunications
carrier who submits or executes a change in a provider of
telephone exchange service or telephone toll service in
violation of the procedures prescribed under subsection (a)
shall be fined a minimum of $50,000 for the first offense and
shall be fined a minimum of $100,000 for any subsequent
offense.
''(2) Penalties for activities of agents and resellers.--
The Commission may assess penalties for violations of the
procedures prescribed under subsection (a) in the case of a
carrier that submits or executes unauthorized changes on behalf
of its agents or resellers if the carrier meets such conditions
as the Commission shall prescribe in regulations.
''(d) Criminal Penalties.--Any person who submits or executes a
change in a provider of telephone exchange service or telephone toll
service in willful violation of the procedures prescribed under
subsection (a)--
''(1) shall be fined in accordance with title 18, United
States Code, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both; but
''(2) if previously convicted under this subsection at the
time of a subsequent offense, shall be fined in accordance with
title 18, United States Code, imprisoned not more than 5 years,
or both, for such subsequent offense.
''(e) Disqualification From Certain Activities.--
''(1) Disqualification of persons.--Subject to paragraph
(3), any person convicted under subsection (d), in addition to
any fines or imprisonment under that subsection, may not carry
out any activities covered by section 214.
''(2) Disqualification of companies.--Subject to paragraph
(3), any company substantially controlled by a person convicted
under subsection (d) may not carry out any activities covered
by section 214.
''(3) Reinstatement.--
''(A) In general.--The Commission may terminate the
application of paragraph (1) or (2) of this subsection
to a person or company, as the case may be, if the Commission
determines that the termination would be in the public interest.
''(B) Effective date.--The termination of the
applicability of paragraph (1) or (2) to a person or
company, as the case may be, under subparagraph (A) may
not take effect earlier than 5 years after the date on
which the applicable paragraph applied to the person or
company.
''(f) Actions by States.--Whenever the attorney general of a State,
or an official or agency designated by a State, has reason to believe
that any person has engaged or is engaging in a pattern or practice of
unauthorized changes in providers of telephone exchange service or
telephone toll service of residents in such State in violation of the
procedures prescribed under subsection (a), the State may bring a civil
action on behalf of its residents to enjoin such practices, to recover
damages equal to the actual monetary loss suffered by such residents,
or both. If the court finds the defendant executed such changes in
willful and knowing violation of such procedures, the court may, in its
discretion, increase the amount of the award to an amount equal to not
more than 3 times the amount awardable under the preceding sentence.
''(g) No Preemption of State Law.--Nothing in this section shall
preempt the availability of relief under State law for unauthorized
changes of providers of intrastate telephone exchange service or
telephone toll service.
''(h) Reports on Complaints.--
''(1) Reports required.--Each telecommunications carrier
shall submit to the Commission, as frequently as the Commission
shall require, a report on the number of complaints of
unauthorized changes in providers of telephone exchange service
or telephone toll service that are submitted to the carrier by
its subscribers. Each report shall specify each provider of
service complained of and the number of complaints relating to
such provider.
''(2) Utilization.--The Commission shall use the
information submitted in reports under this subsection to
identify telecommunications carriers that engage in patterns
and practices of unauthorized changes in providers of telephone
exchange service or telephone toll service.''.
(d) Treatment of Regulations.--The Federal Communications
Commission may treat the regulations prescribed under section 258 of
the Communications Act of 1934 before the date of enactment of this Act
as regulations prescribed under such section 258, as amended by this
section, but only to the extent that the regulations prescribed before
such date of enactment are not inconsistent with the requirements of
such section, as so amended.
(e) Report on Slamming Violations.--
(1) In general.--Not later than October 31, 1998, the
Federal Communications Commission shall submit to Congress a
report on its enforcement actions against carriers for
violations of the procedures prescribed under section 258(a) of
the Communications Act of 1934, as in effect on the day before
the date of enactment of this Act.
(2) Elements.--The report shall--
(A) set forth the number of complaints against each
telecommunications carrier that was subject to more
than 100 complaints in 1997 for violation of the
procedures referred to in paragraph (1); and
(B) describe the penalties assessed against each
such carrier for violations of such procedures.

SEC. 3. REVIEW OF ADEQUACY OF LICENSING REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES.

Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act,
the Federal Communications Commission shall submit to Congress a report
that--
(1) assesses the adequacy and effectiveness of the
licensing requirements and procedures of the Commission under
section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 214)
in determining whether or not a carrier is suitable for
licensing under that section; and
(2) identifies additional actions that the Commission could
take under that section in order to ensure that new licenses
are not issued under that section to persons or carriers that
have previously lost their licenses for violations of section
258 of that Act (47 U.S.C. 258) or have otherwise engaged in
egregious violations of such section 258.
Output:
Telephone Slamming Prevention Act of 1998 - Amends the Communications Act of 1934 (the Act) to require procedures prescribed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to verify a subscriber's selection of a provider of telephone exchange or toll service to: (1) preclude the use of negative option letters of agency; and (2) require the retention of a subscriber's selection verification.
Allows a subscriber whose provider is changed in violation of such Act to pay the former provider for all services provided by the unauthorized provider.
Authorizes civil penalties: (1) of a minimum of $50,000 for the first offense and $100,000 for any additional offense by carriers who submit or execute an unauthorized change of provider service; and (2) in the case of a carrier that submits or executes unauthorized changes on behalf of its agents or resellers. Prescribes criminal penalties of a fine and up to one year in prison for a first offense and up to five years in prison for a subsequent offense for such a willful violation by any person.
Prohibits any person or company convicted of such violations from participating in the provision of universal telecommunications service and related activities authorized under the Act. Authorizes reinstatement of such participation, but no earlier than five years after such prohibition, if found by the FCC to be in the public interest.
Authorizes a State to bring an action on behalf of its residents when it has reason to believe that a carrier has or is engaging in a pattern or practice of making such unauthorized changes in service providers.
Requires each carrier to report to the FCC on the number of complaints of unauthorized provider changes submitted to such carrier by its subscribers. Directs the FCC to utilize such information to identify carriers that engage in patterns and practices of unauthorized provider changes.
Directs the FCC to report to the Congress on: (1) its enforcement against carriers for violations of this Act; (2) the adequacy and effectiveness of carrier licensing requirements and procedures in determining whether a carrier is suitable for such license; and (3) additional actions the FCC could take to ensure that new licenses are not issued to persons or carriers that have previously lost such license due to violations covered by this Act or that have engaged in egregious violations covered by this Act.