Teacher:In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: Comment: What is clearly orchestrated is the Liberal response to the election of Mr. Scheer as the leader of the Conservative Party. The policy statement that he has been absolutely clear on is that neither the same-sex marriage debate or the abortion issue will be re-opened by his party.

Nevertheless, the "progressive" attack machine is churning out barbs criticising Mr. Scheers's faith, the number of children he has, even the notion that he'd let his children play on Scotchgarded carpets in Stornoway and more.

Mr. Scheer is attacked by "progressives" for voting his conscience in parliament too . . . I guess personal integrity is so foreign to "progressives" they think being true to your beliefs is a bad thing.

If one reads carefully, there is a suspicious sameness to all the "progressives" attacks. Cut and paste from the Liberal Party HQ missives to its faithful?
Student:
Non-insult