input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. CHAPTER XXVIII

A DISCOVERY OF INTEREST

It was a stinging rebuke, and everybody within hearing felt its effect. There was a sudden hush, and then Bolton turned and skated away, muttering savagely under his breath.

Once more the game proceeded, but before the puck could be gotten within striking distance of either goal the whistle blew; and the first half of the game came to an end.

"Wonder what Nat Poole thinks of his team now?" remarked Roger, as the boys gathered in a group to discuss the plays made.

"He is as mad as hops," reported Plum. "He says Bolton was not to blame, and that it wasn't fair for Mr. Dodsworth to rule him off."

"They ought to be satisfied," said Messmer, who was close by. "Langley, the substitute, is as good as Bolton, if not better."

"Say, we must keep them from scoring in the second half!" cried Ben. "That will break Nat's heart. He has been blowing constantly that he was going to do us up."

"Look out for tricks," cautioned Dave. "They may have something up their sleeve they haven't tried yet--although I doubt it."

Promptly on time the second half of the game started. As soon as the puck was put into action it was seen that Nat's team had adopted new tactics. This was to "worry" the disc along close to the side line, and in such a manner that Dave's seven had to either miss it or run the risk of off-side plays. 1. Who skated away?
2. After hearing what?
3. Was there a rebuke?
4. What did the whistle blow signify?
5. What did Roger say?
6. When did he say it?
7. Who responded?
8. Whos fault did he know it was?
9. Was Mr. Dodsworth being fair?
10. Who was the substitute?
11. Was he worse than Bolton?
numbered_answers: 1. Bolton
2. a sudden hush
3. yes
4. the first half of the game came to an end.
5. "Wonder what Nat Poole thinks of his team now?"
6. as the boys gathered in a group
7. Plum
8. Bolton
9. no
10. Langley
11. no

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. Even though there is a broad scientific agreement that essentialist and typological conceptualizations of race are untenable, scientists around the world continue to conceptualize race in widely differing ways, some of which have essentialist implications. While some researchers sometimes use the concept of race to make distinctions among fuzzy sets of traits, others in the scientific community suggest that the idea of race often is used in a naive or simplistic way,[page needed] and argue that, among humans, race has no taxonomic significance by pointing out that all living humans belong to the same species, Homo sapiens, and subspecies, Homo sapiens sapiens.

There is a wide consensus that the racial categories that are common in everyday usage are socially constructed, and that racial groups cannot be biologically defined. Nonetheless, some scholars argue that racial categories obviously correlate with biological traits (e.g. phenotype) to some degree, and that certain genetic markers have varying frequencies among human populations, some of which correspond more or less to traditional racial groupings. For this reason, there is no current consensus about whether racial categories can be considered to have significance for understanding human genetic variation. 1. Do people think race labels are natural or made by society?
2. Do they think race can be attributed strictly to biology?
3. Does everyone agree?
4. Why not?
5. Do they have any other reasons?
6. What are they?
7. Does this cause a division of opinion?
8. About what?
9. Are there any wide ranging things that are generally agreed upon?
10. What are they?
11. Anything else?
12. What core group are all people a part of?
13. What's that called?
14. Is there a subgroup?
15. And what is that?
16. What do most science enthusiasts agree about essentially?
17. Does this cause the majority to view it the same then?
18. How do some folks feel racial comparisons come across?
19. What do they think isn't significant?
20. Do some folks have distinct racial concepts for hyper clear trait settings?
numbered_answers: 1. socially constructed
2. no
3. no
4. some argue that racial categories correlate with biological traits
5. yes
6. certain genetic markers correspond to traditional racial groupings
7. yes
8. about whether racial categories can have significance for understanding human genetic variation
9. yes
10. racial categories are socially constructed
11. and racial groups cannot be biologically defined
12. the same species
13. Homo sapiens
14. yes
15. subspecies, Homo sapiens sapiens
16. that essentialist and typological conceptualizations of race are untenable
17. no
18. naive or simplistic
19. race has no taxonomic significance
20. no

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. Hong Kong (CNN) -- An Australian teenager reported missing two months ago has been found alive in dense bushland not far from his home, local police say.

Matthew Allen, 18, was last seen at his family home near Westleigh, a suburb about 30 kilometers (20 miles) away from Sydney, on November 27.

Police feared the worst as the teen had not taken his mobile phone with him or accessed his bank accounts.

More from CNN Justice: Three years later, no sign of missing family

Extensive searches by police and emergency services failed to find him.

On Saturday, two hikers told police that they had spotted a "disorientated man" in bushland not far from Westleigh.

When rescuers reached Allen, he was in a bad way suffering from exhaustion and dehydration.

Local media said he was emaciated, covered in leeches and mosquito bites and his feet and lower legs were suffering from gangrene.

It was believed he had been in the bush the entire nine weeks he was missing, police said.

More from CNN Justice: Casey Anthony files for bankruptcy

''He was in such a poor state,'' Detective Acting Inspector Glyn Baker told the Sydney Morning Herald.

''He was completely exhausted, completely dehydrated, suffered significant weight loss, somewhere up to 50%. He was suffering from partial blindness and he had leeches all over him.''

He was winched out by a rescue helicopter and taken to a nearby hospital, where he was reunited with his family.

Allen went missing during a record heatwave when Sydney endured temperatures above 45 degrees Celsius. 1. What did hikers find?
2. Where?
3. Where was it close to?
4. How many hikers were there?
5. When did they see him?
6. Who did it turn out to be?
7. How old is he?
8. How someone reported him missing
9. How long was he gone?
10. Where does he live?
11. What big city is that close to?
12. How far apart are they?
13. Was he in good shape when they found him?
14. Was was he experiencing?
15. Anything else?
16. Was some kind of animal on him?
17. What?
18. What had bitten him?
19. How much of his body weight had he lost?
20. Who filed for bankruptcy?
numbered_answers:
1. a "disorientated man"
2. in bushland
3. Westleigh
4. two
5. On Saturday
6. Matthew Allen,
7. 18
8. Yes
9. two months
10. Westleigh
11. Sydney
12. 20 miles
13. no
14. dehydration
15. partial blindness
16. Yes
17. leeches
18. mosquitos
19. 50%
20. Casey Anthony