In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.

Input: Consider Input: Context: To evaluate the efficacy of continuous low-level heat wrap therapy for the treatment of various sources of wrist pain including strain and sprain (SS), tendinosis (T), osteoarthritis (OA), and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).', 'Prospective, randomized, parallel, single-blind (investigator), placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial.', 'Two community-based research facilities.', 'Ninety-three patients (age range, 18-65 y) with wrist pain.', 'Subjects with moderate or greater wrist pain were randomized and stratified to 1 of the following treatments: efficacy evaluation (heat wrap, n=39; oral placebo, n=42) or blinding (oral acetaminophen, n=6; unheated wrap, n=6). Data were recorded over 3 days of treatment and 2 days of follow-up.', 'The primary comparison was between the heat wrap and the oral placebo group among SS/T/OA subjects for pain relief. Outcome measures included pain relief (0-5 scale), joint stiffness (101-point numeric rating scale), grip strength measured by dynamometry, and perceived pain and disability (Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation [PRWE]); subjects with CTS also completed the Symptom Severity Scale and Functional Status Scale.', 'Heat wrap therapy showed significant benefits in day 1 to 3 mean pain relief (P=.045) and increased day 3 grip strength (P=.02) versus oral placebo for the SS/T/OA group. However, joint stiffness and PRWE results were comparable between the 2 treatments. For the CTS group, heat wraps provided greater day 1 to 3/hour 0 to 8 mean pain relief (P=.001), day 1 to 3 mean joint stiffness reduction (P=.004), increased day 3 grip strength (P=.003), reduced PRWE scores (P=.0015), reduced symptom severity (P=.001), and improved functional status (P=.04). In addition, the heat wrap showed significant extended benefits through follow-up (day 5) in the CTS group.\Question: Is continuous low-level heat wrap therapy effective for treating wrist pain?

Output: Continuous low-level heat wrap therapy was efficacious for the treatment of common conditions causing wrist pain and impairment.

Input: Consider Input: Context: Chlorophyllin (CHL) was proved to have strong anti-inducement effect toward many mutagens and epicarcinogens. This study was to explore effect of CHL in preventing colon neoplasms in mice induced by dimethylhydrazine (DMH), and the selective inhibition on cyclooxygenase 2(COX-2).', 'The colorectal neoplasms were induced with DMH in mice and the different dose of CHL were administered in different phases, then the prevention of colorectal neoplasms by CHL was examined; The IC50 and growth curve of HT29 cells were measured with MTT method after treated with CHL; The effect of CHL on the expression of COX-1 mRNA and COX-2 mRNA in HT29 cells were measured with RT-PCR method; The effect of CHL on the expression of COX-2 protein and NF-kappaB protein were measured with western blot and immunohistochemistry methods.', 'The incidence of colon cancer, average tumor amount, and percentage of carcinoma in CHL group were significantly lower than those in DMH group (P< .05); CHL could inhibit the growth of HT29 cells. The effects were dose dependent; CHL could selectively inhibit the expression of COX-2mRNA in HT29 cells,the expression of COX-2 protein in colon neoplasms and HT29 cells, and the expression of NF-kappaB protein in colon neoplasms.\Question: Do [ CHL prevent colon neoplasms in mice and its selective inhibition on COX-2 ]?

Output: CHL could prevent colon neoplasms in mice induced by DMH and the preventive effect related to selective inhibition on COX-2, furthermore, the inhibition of CHL on COX-2 was realized by inhibiting NF-kappaB protein.

Input: Consider Input: Context: The effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus (adult-onset non-insulin-dependent), which is the most common form of diabetes in humans, on osseointegration capacity has not been addressed in an appropriate animal model. This study histologically and histomorphometrically examines bone healing around titanium implants in the type 2 diabetes rat model.', 'Titanium implants with a chamber were placed into the femurs of normal male rats and genetically modified male rats with a close symptomatic resemblance to human type 2 diabetes, as characterized by late-onset hyperglycemia and obesity. Cross-sectional histology for the tissue grown into the implant chamber was examined.', 'Bone volume around implants was consistently (from weeks 4 to 8 postimplantation) smaller for the diabetes group than for the control group in the cortical area, while the bone volume in the marrow area was not affected by the diabetes. Bone-implant contact percentage was considerably lower for the diabetes group in both the cortical and marrow areas, with the week 4 bone-implant contact in the cortical area being 12% for the diabetes group and 61% for the control group. A 2-fold difference remained at week 8. Bone morphogenesis in the diabetic rats was characterized by fragmented bone tissues and extensive soft tissue intervention.\Question: Does type 2 diabetes impair implant osseointegration capacity in rats?
Output: Type 2 diabetes mellitus impaired osseointegration capacity disproportionally between the cortical bone and bone marrow areas. The reduction of the bone quantity in the cortical area and the bone-implant contact in both the cortical and marrow areas was remarkable.