You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: If I cared about what you thought, Gary, I'd certainly consider your suggestion.

Unfortunately for you, I am not in a position where you wield any sort of power over me. You don't get to grade my writing.

Mr. Massengill's original post was (IN MY OPINION) a pompous, and false appeal to his own authority. By setting himself up as a legitimate authority on history and politics, he declared himself a speaker of truth, not opinion. Science was invoked to back up his claim to truth.

Rather than waste time pointing out his fallacy, I chose to let the air out of his screed by pointing out an error he made not once, but twice. It gave truth to his lie of superiority.

I enjoy ruthlessly pricking the odd gonfalon bubble, Gary. And, f I can do it with wit, and an economy of words, I'll continue to do so.

Try to get out more. Read something new today. Throw a ball for your dog. Google Dave Berry's year in review. Tickle a baby. A life with no laughter is not one worth living. Lighten up
Output:
Non-obscene