In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: $14,000 a year would be the equivalent of what I expect in annual repayments from my Social Security fund. F*ck these rich f*ckers who don't give two darns about any of us.
[EX A]: Obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: This is why old media G&M is dying. Anyone with a few brain cells can see this is a Re/Max propaganda dressed up as news. In other words, this is fake news.

More honest headline: "Bubble to grow more toxic in 2017 if real estate shills get their wish."
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: Pius took a great teaching on sexual freedom for Downs Syndrom and mentally ill patients and turned it on its head. As I said, he was acting in response to Lambreth. The majority of the encyclical was a vainglorous attempt to fight back against moderity. It was so quaint that there was an outcry for the Council to repeal it, which the Trads fought off and ultimately Ottoviani scuttled. Still, the economic logic still stands and I have no qualms in wanting birth control not to be necesssary for ecoomic reasons. Benedict echoed that in Caritas in Veritate. As for the pill, it regulated my ex-wife's emotions and removing it probably helped cause our divorce.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene