instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Burn his house down.
answer:
Yes

question:
So what you can't refute you attempt to 'label'. I guess that's how you 'dumb-down' issues to the point where you can stop thinking about them. But I won't feel 'guilty' defending my children and grandchildren, and will without hesitation engage in 'macroagression' for their sake. Don't care what you think about that.
answer:
No

question:
So there we have it.
It's the position of the industry, (advocated by their sock-puppets in the legislature) that AK's fiscal needs are a threat to their tax gift. Thank you Rebecca, for making it so very clear.

Strip funding for all govt service, however necessary, so that the industry can extract AK's resource wealth, for their benefit alone. And our crooked, bought off legislature obediently goes along. Counter to AK's constitution, and the oath they've sworn, to uphold the same.
answer:
No