In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

[Q]: if you 're into watching near on two hours of bored , foul - mouthed florida teens having sex , doing drugs , having sex , listening to eminem , having sex , playing video games , having sex , and killing one of their peers , then " bully " 's for you .
based on jim schutze 's novelization of a true - life event , " bully " charts the story of a handful of disenchanted teenagers who , in 1993 , murdered their high school bully in cold , calculated blood .
the film could have provided fascinating insights into what turned these aimless kids into premeditated killers .
in the hands of controversial director larry clark ( " kids " ) , however , it has less to say about its subject matter and more to say about the filmmaker 's pornographic proclivities .
in terms of the incident and what provoked it , " bully " stirs up nothing new .
the high schoolers are presented as a uniformly screwed up lot -- bored with life , not much ambition , promiscuous , profane .
the bully in question , bobby kent ( nick stahl ) , is certainly an unpleasant piece of work
but he does n't exactly tower over his colleagues in the pathological department .
he hounds and harries and humiliates his " best friend " marty ( played by brad renfro ) and marty 's girlfriend lisa ( rachel miner ) does n't care for it at all and comes up with the idea of killing bobby .
simply remove him from the equation .
marty and lisa and a handful of their promiscuous , profane , and stoner friends , plus a recruited hit man ( ? ) , lure bobby to a swamp one night , stab him , beat him over the head with a baseball bat , and dump him into the canal where the sand crabs and the gators , presumably , finish him off .
there 's no remorse --
the next day they 're talking about it as openly as a homework assignment .
they did it because they wanted to , and because they could .
what 's most troubling about the film , however , is n't the unsettling subject matter and the matter - of - fact way these young people go about eliminating one of their own but the way in which clark is constantly distracted by his own material
.
not only is the nudity plentiful and graphic in " bully
" but there 's also an uneasy , exploitative feel to it .
gratuitous crotch shots abound ( one of which makes the zipper cut - away in " there 's something about
mary " look like the height of subtlety ! ) .
clark is so pre - occupied with his female ( predominantly ) leads that
you forget , at times , what this movie is supposed to be about .
the stripping bare , literally and figuratively , of these actors ( who are , after all , playing underage teenagers ) becomes harder to watch over time , as you begin to feel for them and question the motives of the man behind the camera .
the conclusion of " bully " offers up literal snapshots of information about the sentences imposed on each of the protagonists for their involvement in the crime .
it 's a short sequence of stills -- heather : 7 years ; ali : 40 years ; lisa : life imprisonment , for example -- but it 's infinitely more telling than the 110 minutes of rampant unpleasantness that precedes it .
"
bully " aims for truth , exploits it shamelessly , then bludgeons it to death .
[A]: N

[Q]: its a stupid little movie that trys to be clever and sophisticated , yet trys a bit too hard .
with the voices of woody allen , gene hackman , jennifer lopez , sylvester stallone , and sharon stone , this computer - animated yak - fest ( think toy story [ 1996 ] filled with used merchandising ) is one for the ant - eaters .
the main story is the independence of a worker named z ( allen ) .
he wants more to life than just digging away underground for the colony .
when he finds out about ' ' insectopia , " a mythical place where all insects can run free , z , along with his colony 's princess ( stone ) , journey out into the world to find a meaning for life .
about 15 minutes into the picture , i began to wonder what the point of the film was .
halfway through , i still did n't have an answer .
by the end credits , i just gave up and ran out .
antz is a mindless mess of poor writing and even poorer voice - overs .
allen is nonchalant , while i would have guessed , if i had n't seen her in the mighty and basic instinct , stone ca n't act , even in a cartoon .
this film is one for the bugs : unfunny and extremely dull .
hey , a bug 's life may have a good time doing antz in .
[A]: N

[Q]: " houston .
we have a serious problem .
" after making " mission : impossible " , brian de palma has a lot to live up to .
by making an epic science fiction and inviting great cast and talented crew , he hopes to reach the modern audience .
and the possibilities are certainly there , but the result is a great disaster .
starting in a near future , with a prologue copied from " apollo 13 " , de palma slowly builds up his " story " .
the human race has already set foot on mars .
a research expedition has vanished without trace on the red planet and another one has been sent to find out what happened .
this is basically the whole plot .
so it 's hard to imagine that it can be stretched to 2 hours .
but de palma manages to do that .
it is not a very good achievement .
as we follow this expedition to mars and watch them slowly float in space , the hardest thing to do is stay awake .
the film 's major problem is that it tries to seem more clever than it is .
david mamet 's dialogue , while trying to seem natural , is distant and simply fake .
de palma and mamet wanted to combine action with a thought provoking plot .
the result is more like an unsuccessful mutation of kubrick 's " 2001 : a space odyssey " , " apollo 13 " and " godzilla " .
to make time pass , the creators have inserted several " refreshing " scientific details , that would not convince a half - crazed frog .
it consists of multiple copies and direct ripp - offs from several great science fiction films and stories .
when it finally presents an almost original idea ,
it falls flat because of its uncovered stupidity .
i ca n't even call this film predictable , since
no one with a healthy imagination can come up with something like this .
sometimes it gets so cheesy , that you 'll start laughing when you 're supposed to cry and cry when you 're supposed to laugh .
you 'll see enormous sandstorms , hear mysterious sounds and , last but not least , on this " constantly surprising " tour you 'll see -- an alien .
it 's really hard to find comparisons to such an experience , and i know that i 've never said that before ( i thought i never would ) , but " lost in space " is actually better .
that 's an achievement in itself !
director brian de palma has stroke gold with " untouchables " that became an instant american classic .
it is for this film that he will be remembered , while all his other failures will be forgotten .
he 'll live to fight another day !
i send the actors my condolences , since they truly do try to transform into their undeveloped and dull characters .
and both the cinematography , production design and art direction are very decent .
it is because of the achievement of 254 people , that i rate this film 2/10 .
unfortunately their hard work was in vain . if you have problems with insomnia , i recommend you this film .
if you 're not asleep within the first half hour , consult your doctor .
[A]:
N