In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: _"like all Republicans: show me the money"_ -- GoDucks!

I have to love this. Some anonymous person, posting as "GoDucks!" is trying to knock a candidate for raising money.

Ummm. It's Nike's money that has turned UO from an educational institution into a semi-pro athletic money machine and party school.

Go Ducks indeed!

-- Paul

Output: Non-identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Christianity was aggressive removed from pubic school but Islam has been welcomed with open arms. There is a huge hypocrisy by both the School board and Muslims. Just like animals, some religions are more equal than others

Output: Identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: does anybody find a chair polisher finding a reason to sit down as a surprise - not one mention of the cult of the false accusation - the G&M series was a rip-off a discredited study in the US stating a culture of rape existed on college campuses that saw 1 in 5 female students raped - anybody remember the Rolling Stone article that got thoroughly trashed and yuge judgment award against the magazine or how bout the Duke lacrosse team that got a yuge settlement for unfounded accusations or how bout Columbia that got hammered for yuge judgment for false accusations of woman who wore a mattress on her back because she couldn't concede defeat and that she lied - epic fail by Doolittle and sycophants that want to use lawfare for petty spiteful vindictive plays to get even with the man who stopped returning calls
Output: Non-identity-attack