In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: The most common socio/religious 'phobia' in Canada is anti-semitism. If this were addressed in these articles regarding islamophobia I would be able to take them more seriously. Although in general, I am a supporter of multiculturalism I do not think that it is the role of our government to single out one community in general for special protection when we have laws adequately protecting all citizens. Especially when that one community is known for all kinds of 'phobias' such as homophobia.

Output: Agree

Input: Consider Input: Comment: If a Canadian person were to paint like the French impressionists, would that person be committing cultural appropriation? Would people scream it is unacceptable?

If a French person were to paint like the Canadian Group of Seven, would that person be committing cultural appropriation? Would that be unacceptable?

If eastern foreigners or indigenous people in Canada adopt western language and styles of writing and western ways, would that be cultural appropriation? Should that be unnaceptable?

When is adopting some of ways of another culture acceptable and when is it unaccptable?

What do the Metis say?

And isn't immitation the finest form of flattery?

Output: Agree

Input: Consider Input: Comment: God help us.

Those operatives are now running the PMs office in Ottawa.

Already we have seen evidence of this arrogance that they are above the law..
Output: Agree