In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Q: Comment: Your an idiot plain and simple. Your anti gun, anti hunting rhetoric is evidence that you have reach full retardation.

A: Insult
****
Q: Comment: Interesting. He sounded like a real scumbag. I hope Monegan does some deep thinking about how to improve the results of the AST hiring process.

That said, Palin was off her rocker to adopt a personal vendetta against the guy for personal reasons. Everyone associated with that family can be written off as trash.

A: Insult
****
Q: Comment: The banks have generally produced solid numbers over the past few years despite a lot of valid caution thrown their way due various concerns that have not either materialized (housing bubble crash) or weren't as impactful as expected (loan exposure to the oil sands). However, they had a fantastic run-up the past year and are likely due for a breather to revert to the mean. If you're focused on their dividends, they're solid. However, I suspect the banks will under-perform from a TR perspective over the next year.

A:
Non-insult
****