Q: If yeah what's funny is the idea that uh you know what i consider you know like a three-quarter backswing or even a half backswing uh my friend says that's you know that's a full backswing and you don't want to go any further than that so i mean it's a now it's a matter of trying to convince myself that that's right, can we say that "My friend says what I thought was a three-quarter or half backswing is a full backswing and I shouldn't go further than that so I'm trying to tell myself that's right."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Q: If According to a program official, the inability to demonstrate system reliability contributed to a production delay of about 1 year., can we say that "The system was known to fail regularly, incinerating any workers who happened to be nearby."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Q: If The final rule withdraws both exemptions and introduces three limited exemptions for permissible payments by employers to bona fide employees., can we say that "The last rule deals with payments that are allowable."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Q: If However, the nature of these Federal physical assets that are classified as stewardship PP and E differ from general PP and E in that their values may be indeterminable or may have little meaning (for example, museum collections, monuments, assets acquired in the formation of the nation) or that allocating the cost of such assets (for example, military weapons systems and space exploration hardware) to accounting periods that benefit from the ownership of such assets is meaningless., can we say that "It is meaningless to allocate the costs of assets like these."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
yes