QUESTION: Given the sentence "A little blond girl is looking up." can we conclude that "The girl is staring at a cricket on the ground."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: You can not look up and stare down at the ground at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "An asian woman in a pink and white striped t-shirt taking a picture." that "The asian woman is wearing pink."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The asian woman is taking picture and has a t-shirt on which is pink.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "A woman in a green sweater staring into the water from a bridge."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A woman is standing on a bridge." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Sentence 2 just reconfirms that a woman is standing on a bridge.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Premise: "A mime performing on stage holds a ukulele (mandolin?)."
Hypothesis: "The mime is doing backflips off a couch."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: The mime must either hold a ukulele or be doing a backflip.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A singer and guitarist performing."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A singer is performing." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A singer is singing in both instances. There is no non-inferrable information.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A woman in white shorts is standing with a sign that says ""honk to indict bush""."
Hypothesis: "A woman is holding a sign about elmo."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A:
The sign cannot be about Elmo and 'Honk to Indict Bush' at the same time.
The answer is no.