Question: Sentence A: Take your warriors back to Fena Dim.

Sentence B: The warriors had been moved from Fena Dim.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Because Pashupati is the patron deity of Nepal, Pashupatinath, located on the banks of the Bagmati River near the airport, is one of Nepal's most sacred sites.
Nepal has a total of 12 sacred sites.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
And even if the costs were a dead economic loss to other jurisdictions, surely there are gains in national pride for recompense.

Here is a hypothesis:
No national pride can be gained from this economic loss.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: The cumulative case study can be retrospective, aggregating information across studies done in the past, or prospective, structuring a series of investigations for different times in the future.

Sentence 2: The study can be retrospective.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
In her attitude towards Poirot, she was inclined to be suspicious, but he soon broke down her defences.

Does it follow that "Poirot was not a nice person. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "We want to see it again.", can we conclude that "It was interesting to see."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell