[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two dogs urinating on a red fire hydrant."
Hypothesis: "Pets are smart enough."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
These sentence have nothing to do with one another. One sentence is explains two animals urinating while the other is explains that animals are smart.
The answer is no.

Q: Can we conclude from "A man looks over a menu while the waiter waits to take his order." that "The man is interested in ordering a steak."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: The man looking over the menu may or may not be interested in ordering a steak.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: If "An older man is helping to lower a stack of pipes." does that mean that "A man is stacking pipes."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A man refers here was an older man is helping to lower a stack of pipes.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Three little kids in a open field looking towards the sky."
Hypothesis: "The kids are trying to spot particular stars."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Kids looking towards the sky are not necessarily trying to spot particular stars.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: If "A man in a cowboy hat with a guitar singing into a microphone." does that mean that "The man sings country music."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A man can sing into a microphone many types of music which are not necessarily country music.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man in bright colors is being helped to perform his routine."
Hypothesis: "A man is performing a routine."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Being helped to perform a routine means that he is performing a routine.
The answer is yes.