Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: Eric Andre (who played Max in the movie) is a series regular on the upcoming show Don't Trust The B***h in Apartment 23. Sometimes when a TV movie is shot ahead of a series, actors only sign contracts for the one appearance. In the interim they'll get other jobs (which probably pay far better) that have contracts that are more strict and don't allow for the time to work on more than one series. He also has his own Adult Swim show coming out this summer, so he's pretty busy. :D <sep> Q: Why was the game designer actor replaced in the show "Level Up"? A: actors only sign contracts for the one appearance Q: Why do they do this? A: In the interim they'll get other jobs (which probably pay far better) that have contracts that are more strict and don't allow for the time to work on more than one series Q: It seems only one actor was replaced, is this for a particular reason? A: also has his own Adult Swim show coming out this summer, so he's pretty busy. :D Q: Is there a reason the actor was changed from the movie to the series? A: Eric Andre (who played Max in the movie) is a series regular on the upcoming show Don't Trust The B***h in Apartment 23 Q: Why couldn't he do both? A: Eric Andre <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Was he busy on other projects?

Ex Output:
Yes

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: I'm afraid you completely misunderstood a lot of the movie. At the start of the movie, Hal is already dead (killed himself in prison). Those scenes with Hal (mostly in New York) were all flashbacks. The present is with sister in San Francisco. Jasmine meets Dwight at a party in San Francisco. This is long after Hal killed himself. But to your question: "Why did Jasmine arrest Hal?" It was purely a spur of the moment, revenge thing. Hal had just told Jasmine that he was in love with this French girl and was going to leave her. And almost immediately, Jasmine calls the FBI (or rather calls someone to get the FBI's number). <sep> Q: Why did Jasmine arrest Hal? A: It was purely a spur of the moment, revenge thing Q: Who did Jasmine sleep with? A: Dwight <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who does she call?

Ex Output:
Yes

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: The money belonged to Barr so it had his fingerprints on it. The gun was also Barr's as was the van. The whole point of Charlie's actions were to frame Barr for the killing. He had befriended Barr to get close to him and was close enough to be able to drug him and take the various pieces of property away from Barr's house and to return them with incriminating evidence without Barr realising he'd been set up. If I remember correctly the movie shows a jar filled with coins on Barr's desk. Presumably Charlie just took one of these to leave that final piece of incriminating evidence in the multi-story car park. <sep> Q: How did Charlie get Barr Finger prints? A: Charlie just took one of these to leave that final piece of incriminating evidence Q: What did Charlie take one of? A: If I remember correctly the movie shows a jar filled with coins on Barr's desk. Presumably Charlie just took one of these <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why did Charlie kill four people?

Ex Output:
Yes