Question: Sentence A: For 1999, LSC grantees reported closing 1,038,662 million1 civil legal cases relating to issues such as domestic violence, child custody and visitation rights, evictions, access to health care, bankruptcy, unemployment and disability claims, and many other issues that millions of low-income Americans face throughout their lives.

Sentence B: LSC grantees closed over a million civil legal cases for people who otherwise wouldn't have representation.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: However, we are so sophisticated psychometrically and methodologically that virtually every piece of research can be dissected, revealing flaws and problems.
There is no research that can be dissected at all.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Perhaps you are right, Poirot, I said gently.

Here is a hypothesis:
I gently suggested that Poirot was right.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: A timely expenditure of tax revenues might just work wonders.

Sentence 2: A timely expenditure might work wonders, but only for the elderly.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Perhaps the pig has always been a comical animal because it's so much like us--a college graduate with 2.3 children, yacking away on a cell phone while it's stuck in traffic in its rotten SUV.

Does it follow that "Pigs are considered staples of comedy because we can see the similarities between them and us."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "The magazine interviews Microsoft billionaire buddies Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer.", can we conclude that "Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer are poor."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no