In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

robin williams , this time without a beard , returns to drama in this sloppy , sickly sweet fantasy with few redeeming features apart from the incredible effects .
he plays chris nielsen , who meets annie ( annabella sciora ) and promptly marries her .
they have two great kids , who sadly die in a car crash .
just when it could n't get any worse , chris gets killed in a car crash , and goes to heaven where he meets his guide albert ( gooding jnr . )
annie ca n't take the grief anymore , and kills herself .
( all sounding like good fun so far ? )
the ' penalty ' for suicide is to go to hell , and chris goes on a mission to try and rescue her using the help of the traveller ( max von sydow . )
based on a novel by twilight zone writer richard matheson , what dreams may come is clunky , manufactured material doused with a extra load of sugar .
this is the worse spielberg film spielberg never made .
everything is wrong about this movie : the performances are forced , and the audiences fail to relate to any of the characters .
williams puts on a convincing upset face , but that 's all it is : a face .
there 's no emotion behind it .
sciora 's performance is lazy , and bogs down the whole film .
she may look pretty , but she ca n't act .
max von sydow is o .
k as the traveller , if nothing special .
cuba gooding jnr , thankfully , adds some bounce to his performance , and is certainly the best performer in the film .
it 's a shame that his character is so flat and 2-d , and offers no room for improvement .
all the performers have to work with a soppy script
, that tries it 's best to get some emotion going , but never takes off the ground .
there are _ some _ scenes which could be real heartwarmers , but the faceless characters do n't help to get anything out of the performers .
while films like e .
t used great actors , music and direction to pull of a masterful heart - tugging scene , what dreams may come is haphazard , expecting the emotion to come out of the scene automatically .
instead , it 's all rather boring
.
sure , the music is pretty ( by michael kamen ) and the cinematography is n't bad ( by eduardo serra ) but there 's something lacking .
the script does n't help , filled with hopeless romantic clich ?
s , and dud speeches
.
richard matheson can write some awesome science fiction stories , sadly this novel would look embarrassed in a bargain bin , let alone being converted into a $ 70 million vehicle for robin williams . despite being set in heaven , what dreams may come is mightily depressing .
the film rushes a happy ending , but everything before this is very , very sad and black , which just adds to make the ending even more hopeless and stupid
.
but there 's one redeeming feature about this failure of a movie : the special effects .
heaven and hell are truly incredible places , and the actors fit perfectly with the virtual sets .
but despite this , what dreams may come , proves to be nothing but the biggest disappointment of 1998 .
instead of raising questions about existence , it raises boredom .
sadly , i recommend you give this film a miss .
better luck next time , robin .
a david wilcock review ?
1998
"
you know , for kids
" - norville barnes
N