In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: The US forces didn't show a shred of mercy towards Khadr. The report of the incident indicates that they were about to shoot the severely wounded Khadr where he lay. Which, of course, is a war crime. At the last second an order came through from headquarters to patch Khadr up so that he could be interrogated for intel. And that's exactly what happened.

Output: Non-insult

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Rmiller101
"Predict that this guy will also be a disaster for the US."
Will that prediction come from the same crystal ball used to predict the landslide victory of Hillary Clinton?. If so you need to reconsider your sources or face the fact Trump is bringing much needed
change to America.
Cheers.

Output: Non-insult

Input: Consider Input: Comment: You obviously have not read M103. It condemns all forms of discrimination"
Here's what it proposes (from Global News):

The government should recognize the need to "quell the increasing public climate of hate and fear."
The government should "condemn Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination."
The Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage should look at how the government could develop an "approach to reducing or eliminating systemic racism and religious discrimination including Islamophobia" and collect data to "contextualize hate crime reports."
The committee should present its findings and recommendations to Parliament within 240 days.

So basically, if the motion passes, a committee will study how to better tackle religious discrimination in Canada. That's it.
Output: Non-insult