Question: Sentence A: we went and saw uh i think it was uh Sugar Babies that was good that had good music in it

Sentence B: There was no good music in that.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: yeah uh-huh oh so you don't need a personal one
Yeah, so, you don't need a personal one right now because your brother shares with you
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Then the data base is searched for further evidence that confirms or conflicts with the pattern.

Here is a hypothesis:
The data base can be searched for ouliers.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Perhaps we'll see more in the daylight. On the morrow they took up the search once more, and were reluctantly forced to the conclusion that the house had not been invaded for some considerable time.

Sentence 2: The house has never been invaded in its known history.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Quieones Miller says that, though Johnson's reputation in Harlem was mixed, he was known for taking care of the Bumpy made the Italians give money to neighborhood charitable organizations.

Does it follow that "Miller says that Johnson was known for giving Germans money for their charities."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "uh you know you you tax the people that have the most and the people that don't have anything get it for nothing", can we conclude that "You have different tax rates for different people."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell