Generate an explanation for the given claim using the provided supporting material from the paragraph. Please consider the following points while generating an output. 1) The claim will always have supporting proof in the paragraph, and the paragraph will have a clear point of view supporting the claim. 2) There can be instances where direct correlation to the claim is not available. Make use of the sentences in the paragraph to provide a corresponding output supporting the claim. 3) The explanation should be at least one and at most twelve sentences long.
--------
Question: Paragraph: The vote which prompted environmental activists still in council chambers after four hours to break into applause approved an ordinance that bans the transport, handling and storage of coal and petroleum coke at bulk material facilities or terminals in Oakland. "We want jobs that people can have, and have a long life and they don't have to rely upon a job of desperation," said Council President Lynette Gibson McElhaney after the vote. "I just believe that we can do better in Oakland." The ordinance requires a second vote. City leaders have wrestled with the issue for more than a year, as detractors and supporters of the proposed marine terminal argued over the environmental dangers of bringing millions of tons of coal through the area and the economic benefits of good-paying union jobs. The terminal is part of a larger makeover of an army base that closed in 1999, eliminating thousands of jobs. The proposed terminal is in West Oakland, a historically black neighborhood that's among the poorest and most polluted in the region. The council approved the project before the coal proposal was made. It's uncertain whether the terminal will continue without shipping coal. A lawyer for the Oregon Bulk and Oversized Terminal on Monday sent the council a letter detailing potential legal consequences. "Politically, no quantity of handling coal or petcoke under whatever extraordinary standard will be tolerated," said David Smith. "While that may accomplish a political outcome, it is only the first steps towards an unfortunate legal outcome." City leaders said they were confident they could overcome a legal challenge. More than 150 people on both sides rallied outside the building Monday before the evening meeting. They packed the council's chamber, cheering and booing as speakers testified. At times, it was so hard to hear speakers that the council president had to ask security to remove some people from the room. Coal proponents railed at the council for what they saw as a pre-ordained vote. They argued that any environmental impact would be mitigated by transporting coal in covered rail cars that are unloaded underground. "We agree 1,000 percent that West Oakland is polluted," said Ron Muhammad, a fourth-generation resident of West Oakland. "But the project has a plan to mitigate it, to address it, so since the public health portion is taken out of the picture, then it goes back to the jobs." On the other side, coal opponents argued there was no way to keep coal dust from escaping into the air, and that rail shipment would worsen the health of children already disadvantaged by poverty and bad air. "This whole notion of coal-covered cars is rather ridiculous to say the least because it's never been done before," said Derrick Muhammad of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union, which opposes the shipment of coal. Among the speakers were residents of Utah who were furious that their state lawmakers had pumped more than $50 million in public money to build the facility, hoping to spur investment in the state's rural counties. Claim: Oakland council bans coal shipments, citing health risks.

Answer: The Oakland City Council voted unanimously Monday night to kill a plan to use a proposed marine terminal to transport Utah coal to Asia, calling such shipments public health and safety hazards. Backers argued the project would bring needed jobs to an impoverished part of town.

Question: Paragraph: McLaren Flint Hospital on Friday requested an administrative hearing before the state enforces the terms of an order over issues with the bacteria that causes Legionnaires' disease. The Flint Journal reports McLaren's attorneys say the order issued Wednesday by the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs contains allegations, findings and conclusions that are untrue. Flint, while under state financial management, switched to the Flint River for water in 2014 without treating it to reduce corrosion. Lead leached from pipes, contaminating the system. At the same time, a deadly Legionnaires' disease outbreak occurred that led to criminal charges against government officials. ___ Information from: The Flint Journal, http://www.mlive.com/flint Claim: Flint hospital wants hearing on order over Legionella risks.

Answer: A Flint hospital ordered by the state to take steps to reduce the risk of exposure to Legionella bacteria wants a hearing on the matter.

Question: Paragraph: It's an understandable query. Producing the Oscars is guaranteed to be a stressful job, but the road to the 91st Academy Awards, which will take place on Sunday, has been unusually bumpy, and public. "We're good! We're good!" Gigliotti said while laughing Thursday afternoon. "Did we look like cadavers yesterday?" Both have been working out of the Dolby Theatre, where hundreds of people are making sure everything is ready by Sunday night when the show airs live in more than 225 countries and territories. But beyond the physical preparation, in the months leading up to the renowned show they and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences have been under immense scrutiny from the public and even peers for basically everything : The choice of a host, the choice to go host-less, the plan for which songs would be included in the broadcast and which awards categories would be aired live. Even the announcement that Queen and Adam Lambert would open the show was met with snark and sarcasm from some: They were worried about the excess time it would take for the cinematography winner to get to the stage and now there's going to be a potentially six-plus-minute Queen performance of a song that isn't even nominated? Oh, and they're also on the hook to save the show from declining ratings (last year's hit a record low of 26.5 million people, down 20 percent from the previous year) and keep the ABC broadcast to a trim three hours. No pressure, right? But Gigliotti and Weiss, who is also directing the show, aren't sweating. "I think that the show is in very good shape," Gigliotti said. "We feel good about the way it is flowing, looking (and) our presenters." The film academy has announced a massive roster of celebrity talent that will be joining the show: Barbra Streisand, Michael B. Jordan, Tina Fey, Charlize Theron and Michael Keaton are just a few of the confirmed presenters. They're also bringing out well-known figures from outside the film world, like Serena Williams, Congressman John Lewis and chef Jose Andres to help present some of the best picture nominees. One thing that's given them confidence is how successful many of the eight best picture nominees have been this year. Conventional wisdom is that the more popular the nominated films are, the more viewers will tune in (one of the highest-rated years was when "Titanic" won). (The nominations) kind of go to the heart of what we were trying to do with this show, which was put a spotlight on films with worldwide success that have had a cultural impact," Gigliotti said, noting "Black Panther," Bohemian Rhapsody," BlacKkKlansman" and "Green Book." Getting Queen to perform on the show was also something they said they discussed very early on. "We thought it was an exciting way to open the show with a lot of energy," Gigliotti said. Also, "Bohemian Rhapsody" was a massive hit worldwide, earning over $100 million in Japan alone. It just made sense for a show hoping to attract a global audience. They aren't looking to set a host-free Oscars precedent, and say that big picture, not much has changed for their overall vision for the show. "As with any other show, moments change along the way," Weiss said. "But the big overlying arc of where we're going is pure to when we first met months ago." Winners are still going to have a 90-second clock running from the time their name is called to the time the orchestra is signaled to start playing them off, but Gigliotti says that they'll make judgment calls if something extraordinary is happening on stage that lasts a bit longer. Weiss said there's a misnomer that they want to cut people off. "Nobody wants to do it," he said. "Our job, make no mistake about it, is to honor them, not antagonize them. We hope that everybody works toward that same end." And also to try to let an east coast audience go to bed by 11 p.m. knowing what the best picture winner is. They've been aware of the chatter on social media, but say they're not ruffled by it. "Everybody's got an opinion," Gigliotti said. "It's interesting. You sort of listen to people. But my doorman, I tell you, he's got an opinion. And he thinks it's a good thing that we're going without a host." As for what a successful show will look like, Weiss confidently said, "Watch Sunday night." After the show is finished, Gigliotti has offered to help plan Weiss' honeymoon (the two live three blocks away from one another in New York). Weiss famously proposed to his girlfriend at the Emmys last year while accepting an award which, incidentally, clocked in at nearly three minutes and was also easily the most memorable moment of the show but hasn't had time to focus on much but the Oscars. "You're not the only woman in my life who thinks that," Weiss joked. ___ Follow AP Film Writer Lindsey Bahr on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ldbahr ___ For full coverage of the Oscars, visit: https://apnews.com/AcademyAwards Claim: Oscars producers say the show is in 'good shape' for Sunday.

Answer:
Academy Awards producers Donna Gigliotti and Glenn Weiss have been hearing the same question a lot recently: Are you OK?