In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: Misuse by the user.

Yup. Cause aaaallll those users, they just went right out and got pills from the local grocery store.

Oh no! Wait! They were given prescriptions by uninformed, misinformed, ignorant, and willingly ignorant, mis-prescribing physicians.

Let's put the damn blame where it really belongs--on the "supply" end, which ended up creating a "demand" end.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: I do not think any Canadian would mind a MOAB dropped on these traitors' heads.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: Had you taken 10 seconds to read the article in the Aspen Newspaper, or even my reply to Karl Sandin, (before you offered your zero cents worth) you would have seen that the police officer DID try to help them get to a different place where they COULD legally cook the food.

"Fabrocini said he tries to be sympathetic to people's situations and even suggested a spot where the men might be able to finish cooking the food. The men were not arrested or cited, he said."

So much for another ignorant opinion.
Non-sexual-explicit