Craft one correct answer to the question given in input. To make it more interesting, try to use non-stereotypical language if possible. Make sure your correct answer is reasonably long, consistent with the context, and requires common sense (instead of explicit extraction from the context.) In your answer, use as few words as possible from the given context. Use a response that is uncommon/non-stereotypical, so that it is less predictable. To be less repetitive, please vary your language for each question.

Context: As we talked more ( every night ? ? ? ) it occurred to me that she was kinda serious .... i mean .... you know . That 's the past again though , i think she got all she wanted from me , because she will no longer talk to me at all . Next , the party at Nick 's .
Question: Why is the narrator acting so avoidant ?
They want to avoid talking about an old relationship .

Context: and what she 's doing next ... all that stuff . nice to catch up news with her .... she was thinking of staying back in kuching for a while . before deciding what to do next .
Question: What may be the reason she returned ?
To visit people in her hometown .

Context: However , you never seen exactly why he 's found someone to spend time with in Luke ( is this kid really his most likeable patient ? ) other than the fact that Luke is his provider . As far as their therapy sessions , the movie begins in media res , so we never get to that crucial point where a knobhead like Luke would ever meet this therapist , why he would seek therapy , and how they would make the unusual compensation plans involving marijuana . Like so much of this film it 's as inorganic as seedy weed- there 's no way to imagine what happens before or after this movie between these characters .
Question: What may be a fact about this person ?
They are criticizing a film they did n't like .