Problem: Here is a premise:
yeah i guess i was having a hard time there too i thought it sounded well guess we better stick to the subject for the benefit of the people uh uh doing this work but um

Here is a hypothesis:
It's better for the people doing this work if we stick to the subject.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Economic theory tells us that when everyone is polluting a communal stream, everyone can benefit from enforced moderation.

Sentence 2: They wanted everyone to be more thoughtful of their actions.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Texas sure is a lotta country, a whole bag with odds an' ends stuffed in any which way.

Does it follow that "Texas is a tiny place with a uniform type of people. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If Novelist Emile Zola poured forth arguments against industrial exploitation., can we say that "Industrial exploitation was necessary for economic competitiveness, according to Emile Zola."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"yeah there's there's always a drawback to everything i mean i don't know well"
Hypothesis: There's always something negative with everything.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: LABS METHOD METHOD TOTAL5

Sentence 2: Lab method totals
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes