Part 1. Definition
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
Part 2. Example
Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Answer: Sexual-explicit
Explanation: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.
Part 3. Exercise
Comment: Although I admire Fr. Martin's efforts to build bridges between the LGBT community and the hierarchy, I think he's naive about the bishops desperately wanting to reach out to gays and not being sure how? How? That's easy, at least to start. I would propose the following three very, very initial steps. #1: Hold one (or preferably several) listening sessions with the LGBT community. Have it facilitated well, but, Your Excellencies, shut your mouths!!! Let gays talk about their experience and perhaps, for just a moment - mirabili dictu - they can be your teachers! #2: Allow the gay community to celebrate the Eucharist on Sundays as a community (as in Chicago's AGLO). #3: Establish in your (arch)diocese an office whose explicit purpose is to be about the continuing work of building bridges.
Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit