In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
One example: Comment: Damn! Another cloudy day, and it's all Obama's doing!
Solution is here: Obscene
Explanation: This is obscenity because it hints on sexual content that is offensive to the public sense of decency.

Now, solve this: Comment: Your adjectives are highly questionable and rhetorical. An "enemy" ? A critic is an "enemy" ? Who determines "a good thing"? You ? And your "good thing" must be "good" for everybody ? What if it is not ?

She is a "religious ideologue" How on earth do you define that ? Can she be an "ideologue" who just happens to be "religious" ? Are you saying a "religious person is unfit to serve in a public office ? That is surely what it sounds like.

These are just simply your opinions that will resonate with those who think like you. You are going to need to give us something better than this. We do not need a lifelong school system employee to watch the henhouse, as so many lead us to believe. I have a very brief conversation with former 4J sup George Russell a few years ago, who basically told me NOBODY except a person from the system can run school district - I saw hogwash. There are millions of brilliant people in this country and they do not all work for the School District.
Solution:
Non-obscene