In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Decades ago, one could work these jobs and make enough money to buy a house and provide for their families. Now people like like you just tell them they are lazy.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: No other arrests were made? You gotta be kidding me! And I just don't get the philosophy of the police leaving what is obviously a hostile scene to "diffuse" it. I'm thinking harassing a police officer when they are doing their duty to "serve and protect" is a crime. Arrest them all and let them deal with the criminal justice system.. That's gonna cost them money, and we all are lucky some jail time. This outcome just emboldens the rats...
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: That's a nice story, except that it's not true. I was very surprised when I heard Kershaw wasn't starting. Like I said, Darvish looked like crap in game 3, and his eyes looked lost. No way I would have started him in a game 7 with Kershaw available. And again, the metrics on Darvish vs. the Astros are pretty astounding. Frankly, I wouldn't even have put Darvish on the roster for the WS, given his history with the Astros.
[EX A]:
Obscene