Detailed Instructions: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
Problem:Comment: Its all relative.

Relative to your hero Little Potato, all 13 candidates have impressive relevant education, experience, accomplishments and intellect.

The Clown Prince is not maintaining his favourable poll numbers anymore and his slide will continue. Just six months ago he had a 57% approval rating, now it is down to 42% and the net is negative at -5%. This means 5% more people now think Trudeau is not doing a good job. By comparison, Ambrose is at +13%. When the Conservatives elect a permanent leader, this newly emergent gap will widen considerably.

Trudeau is resonating with the folks in on the payoff including greater public sector employees and other PIGs (political interest groups). With the folks who actually pay for his profligacy and pandering - the net taxpayers in the market sector - not so much.

I see you ran out of gas and resorted to the old lefty "spelling mistake = fallacious argument" ploy. This simply makes you look stupid and desperate.
Solution:
Non-threat