Craft one correct answer to the question given in input. To make it more interesting, try to use non-stereotypical language if possible. Make sure your correct answer is reasonably long, consistent with the context, and requires common sense (instead of explicit extraction from the context.) In your answer, use as few words as possible from the given context. Use a response that is uncommon/non-stereotypical, so that it is less predictable. To be less repetitive, please vary your language for each question.

Ex Input:
Context: Most online pharmacies offer overnight delivery , and your prescriptions are delivered in plain packages that will not reveal to anyone that there is a product inside that deals with any highly sensitive conditions you may have . All reputable online pharmacies have secure sites that are SSL certified so that any credit card or bank information you enter is kept completely safe from hackers or phishers . They are licensed pharmacists who get the same FDA approved drugs that your neighborhood pharmacy gets . All you have to do is access one of these web sites online , order your prescription drugs with a credit card and the order will usually arrive the very next day at your front door via a courier service like UPS or FEDEX .
Question: What may be the plausible reason for my narration ?

Ex Output:
I am explaining the safety of ordering from a pharmacy online .

Ex Input:
Context: We are ready to walk out and become independents or capital - L Libertarians or capital - C Constitutionalists or capital - R Reformers . You have one shot at keeping us around , GOP , and even invigorating us to be proud Republicans again . Try not to blow it . Note - Adam Bernay is a longtime Libertarian Republican activist , dating back to the mid-1990s . He has been involved with the Republican Liberty Caucus , particularly in California , in numerous capacities , since about that time .
Question: What is the economic ideology of the narrator ?

Ex Output:
The narrator believes in capitalism .

Ex Input:
Context: Courts should also examine whether the nature of the crime and other evidence support " the ultimate conclusion that an inmate continues to pose an unreasonable risk to public safety . " The majority said that other evidence , such as the inmate 's prison record or his or her mental state or demeanor , should be considered in deciding whether the felon posed a safety threat . George said state law requires the parole board and the governor " to normally grant parole to life prisoners who have committed murder .
Question: What might one conclude about the information in the post ?

Ex Output:
The people releasing a killer after decades in jail need to look at the ALL the risks .