In this task, you're given a question, along with a context passage. The passage will not have a direct answer to the question, but can include some information and a clue for the answer. Assuming you can only obtain information about one entity in the passage, your job is to determine whether information from the passage can be used to answer the question. Indicate your choice as 'a' for Yes or 'b' for No.

Ex Input:
Question: How many people could Stamford Bridge seat the year York joined Aston Villa? Passage:York started his career with Handsworth Royal, Birchfield Rangers and the Royal Air Force, and also guested for Chelsea during World War I. In March 1915 he joined Aston Villa as an amateur, signing professional forms in August 1919. He scored one goal in 17 games in 191920, but did not feature in the 1920 FA Cup Final, which ended in a 10 victory over Huddersfield Town at Stamford Bridge. He appeared just 11 times in 192021, before going on to make 47 appearances in the 192122 campaign, as the "Villans" finished fifth in the First Division. He scored nine goals in 37 games in 192223 and five goals in 43 games in 192324. He also appeared at Wembley in the 1924 FA Cup Final, in a 20 defeat to Newcastle United. He scored seven goals in 34 matches in 192425, before hitting 20 goals in 44 appearances in 192526. He bagged 13 goals in 43 games in 192627, before being limited to just four goals in 30 appearances in 192728. He rediscovered his scoring form with 18 strikes in 48 matches in 192829, before hitting seven goals in 32 games in 192930. However he played just four times in the 193031 campaign, as Villa finished second in the league with an English record of 128 top-flight league goals scored.

Ex Output:
a

Ex Input:
Question: Were the players who scored for Bayer II in the opening game born in the same place? Passage:On 27 July, Bayern Munich II opened up their season with a 21 victory against Union Berlin. Thomas Muller and Mehmet Ekici scored for Bayern II and Shergo Biran scored for Union Berlin. Bayern II finished the matchday tied for fifth with VfR Aalen. On matchday two, on 2 August, Bayern II and Borussia Wuppertal finished in a 22 draw. Deniz Ylmaz and Mehmet Ekici scored for Bayern II and Marcel Reichwein and Tobias Damm scored for Borussia Wuppertal. Bayern II finished the matchday in seventh place. On matchday three, on 16 August, Bayern II defeated Dynamo Dresden 10 with a goal from Daniel Sikorski. Bayern II finished the matchday in third place. On matchday four, on 23 August, Bayern II defeated Eintracht Braunschweig 10 with a goal from Mehmet Ekici. Bayern II finished the matchday in first place. On matchday five, on 29 August, Bayern II defeated Carl Zeiss Jena 21. Deniz Ylmaz and Thomas Muller scored for Bayern II and Salvatore Amirante scored for Carl Zeiss Jena. Bayern II finished the matchday in second place. The match between Bayern II and VfR Aalen on matchday six, on 13 September, finished in a goalless draw. Bayern II finished the matchday in second place. Bayern II had their second consecutive draw after a 11 draw against Werder Bremen II on matchday seven, on 19 September. Bayern II finished the matchday in third place. Bayern II loss of their first match of the season after losing to SC Paderborn 07 21 on matchday eight, on 27 September. Frank Loning scored two goals for Paderborn and Daniel Sikorski scored for Bayern II. Bayern II finished the matchday in seventh place.

Ex Output:
b

Ex Input:
Question: What is the characteristic of the cloth that was imported by the East India Company? Passage:In the 18th century, England was famous for its woollen and worsted cloth. That industry, centred in the east and south in towns such as Norwich, jealously protected their product. Cotton processing was tiny: in 1701 only of cottonwool was imported into England, and by 1730 this had fallen to . This was due to commercial legislation to protect the woollen industry. Cheap calico prints, imported by the East India Company from Hindustan (India), had become popular. In 1700 an Act of Parliament passed to prevent the importation of dyed or printed calicoes from India, China or Persia. This caused demand to switch to imported grey cloth insteadcalico that had not been finisheddyed or printed. These were printed with popular patterns in southern England. Also, Lancashire businessmen produced grey cloth with linen warp and cotton weft, known as fustian, which they sent to London for finishing. Cottonwool imports recovered though, and by 1720 were almost back to their 1701 levels. Again the woollen manufacturers, in true protectionist fashion, claimed that the imports were taking jobs away from workers in Coventry. The Woollen, etc., Manufactures Act 1720 was passed, enacting fines against anyone caught wearing printed or stained calico muslins. Neckcloths and fustians were exempted. The Lancashire manufacturers exploited this exemption; coloured cotton weft with linen warp were specifically permitted by the 1736 Manchester Act. There now was an artificial demand for woven cloth.

Ex Output:
b