IN: This is an email
OUTLOOK EMAIL NOTIFICATION Your Date of Migration is: May 17th YOU WILL BE UNABLE TO SEND E-MAIL unless you take the following action: Please go through your Notes email and clean out as many old/un-needed email items as possible BEFORE your date of migration. After you are migrated to Outlook you will only be allocated 100MB of total Mailbox space. If more than this amount of data is migrated to Outlook YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SEND E-MAIL until it is below the 100MB limit. Cleaning up your Notes email now will prevent this from happening to YOU. Enron's messaging platform is migrating from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Outlook 2000 worldwide. You will be accessing Outlook for all of your email functions. WHY IS ENRON MIGRATING TO OUTLOOK 2000? Many factors contributed to the decision to migrate from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Exchange/Outlook. The most prominent factors were: ? Significant advantages to moving to a product that is more integrated with current Enron apps (Windows 2000, Office and Internet Explorer) ? More efficient Shared PC and Roaming User features ? Improved support and integration for Palm/CE devices ? Instant Messaging capabilities WHAT IS BEING MIGRATED TO OUTLOOK 2000? ? Email Messages. From the date of your scheduled migration, the last (30) thirty days of your Email will be converted for use in Outlook. ? All your folders in Notes you use to store email messages in. ? To Do Items ? Journal Items ? Calendar Entries dating from (1) one year in the past to (10) ten years in the future will be converted. ? Address Books, but NOT your Distribution Lists that you created. You will need to re-create these in Outlook. Thank you,

What is the subject?

OUT: 1-URGENT - Outlook Email Notification (new)
QUESTION: Rhett: You may recall a few weeks ago I asked you about some language that one of our counterparties wanted as an amendment to the term "Indemnifiable Tax". Another counterparty, Deutsche Bank, has requested the following which I think is very similar to what we were looking at before: Notwithstanding the foregoing, "IndemnifiableTax" also means any Tax imposed by reasons of a Change in Tax Law by a government or taxing authority of a Relevant Jurisdiction of the payer, unless the payee is incorporated, organized, managed and controlled or considered to have its seat in such jurisdiction, or is acting for purposes of this Agreement through a branch or office located in such jurisdiction. In the ISDA Users' guide, they explain that the effect of this language is to eliminate the payee's risk of bearing new taxes imposed by the payer's jurisdiction even if the payee's activities in such jurisdiction is the basis for such taxes. (except if the circumstances in the definition occur). It thus results in the payer having to gross up for such taxes. Do you think that we can or should accept this?
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: ISDA Tax Issue
Brian, Attached is a draft of the termination letter. The letter assumes the letter agreement was executed. There also appears to be an agency agreement which appointed Merrick as agent for ROW acquisition. This is also terminated by the letter. I haven't heard from Shonnie yet. Please review and add any comments you have. Thanks
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Merrick Termination
As discussed on today's conference call, in an effort to satisfy the Presiding Judge's request to remove the protected status of materials, Mirant proposes the following action concerning exhibits it filed Nov. 6 pursuant to the protective order in the EL00-95 proceeding (namely, MIR-3 and MIR-4) : Mirant proposes to formally withdraw its submission of the protected versions of Exhibits MIR-3 and MIR-4, leaving the redacted versions of these exhibits as the only versions of MIR-3 and MIR-4 in the record. As noted on the conference call today, Mirant believes that the limited amount of material redacted from these exhibits (certain PPAs pursuant to which Mirant incurred emissions costs) is not relevant to the issues in this proceeding. If any party objects to or has concerns about Mirant undertaking such action, please let me know no later than November 28, 2001 at noon, EST. Thanks much,
Answer: Mirant Protected Materials
Here is an email: I have a question about the SFTS conversions that were done a while back so that the customer could utilize our capacity release program. I noticed that The City of Chattahoochee converted their SFTS to FTS-1 and that the temporary acquisitions on their FTS-1 have a gap. More specifically, they have a release in place for 10/1/02 thru 4/30/03 and the next release begins 10/1/03 thru 4/30/04. Do the releases have to be consecutive in order for them to retain their conversion to FTS-1? Because they will not have a release in place for May thru Sept. of 2003 according to their releases. Is this wrong? I haven't checked to see if this occurs on any of the other coversions and will if this is an issue. Please advise. nb
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: SFTS conversions
QUESTION: Rich, May I get a status on the requests from last week for the $944,239.43 for the Hedge Book and the $1,493,287.81 for Enron Credit? The Order I sent for ENA basically allows us to continue to use bank accounts which existed prior to Bankruptcy. For Enron Credit, I sent supporting documentation which supports that the account was managed and funded by Enron Credit and we had been working for 10 months to get it moved from the ENA family to Enron Credit. Regards,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Status on ENA $944,239.43 and Enron Credit $1,493,287.81