Premise:
"I am pleased to be here today to discuss the essential actions that the federal government needs to take in order to manage its most important asset-its people, or human capital."
Hypothesis: The people, or human capital, are not the most important asset to the federal government.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: This display summarizes information from a variety of sources, including a prototype consolidated financial statement for the US and annual reports that contained information covering the categories of Federal mission PP&E (columns 1 and 5); and hypothetical amounts for revaluation adjustments (column 2); and deletions and additions (columns 3 and 4). If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The display shows the information from one source."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "Therefore, the impact of the rule varies based on the type of business and its place in the chain of production and distribution.", can we conclude that "This rule has little to no impact at all, with no real exceptions or variances."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Many echo Leonardo da Vinci's comparison to sacks of nuts.

Sentence B: Picasso himself echoed the comparison of Da Vinci.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: mental health and racial justice
Doctors are good advocates mental health.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Then you know what he said, Dean?

Here is a hypothesis:
Then he said that he wished you would die; can you believe that?

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell