QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Shaggy little dog jumps in the snow."
Hypothesis: "A dog is outside."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: We know that the dog is outside because it jumps in the snow.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A baseball player dodges a ball with his bat high in the air."
Hypothesis: "Batter narrowly misses being hit with ball."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
To dodge a ball is to miss being hit with the ball.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "A group of guys swimming in red trunks." can we conclude that "A group of guys cooking."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The guys cannot be swimming and cooking at the same time.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "Kids are playing ball in front of a big fancy building."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Kids are playing with a basketball." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Playing ball does not necessarily mean that one is playing basketball.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Four girls in blue perform on a basketball court in front of a crowd."
Hypothesis: "Four girl in the blue."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Four girl in blue is a rephrasing for four girls in blue.
The answer is yes.

Q: If "A man laying on the ground with his arm under a car white a little boy is watching him." does that mean that "A man repairing a car in his garage while his song watches him."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A:
A man with his arm under a car is not necessarily repairing a car and the boy is not necessarily his song.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.