Question: Sentence A: The total dollar value represents a measure of the change in social welfare associated with implementation of the Clear Skies Act.

Sentence B: The implementation of the Clear Skies Act had no affect on the world at large.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: that was in the water you know
You are aware that was in the water.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Time 's cover package focuses on Clinton's failure to sell the war to the American public.

Here is a hypothesis:
Time is very concerned with covering the relationship between war and the American public.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Rouen continues to work on its monuments and public buildings, and recently has finished quayside renovations aimed at bringing life back to the riverside with new promenades.

Sentence 2: Rouen has repeatedly failed to rehabilitate its crumbling architecture and dilapidated riverside.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
This ancient city is due northeast of Bodh Gaya, out on the road to Naland, and it has been holy to both the Buddhists and Jains since the sixth century b.c.

Does it follow that "This ancient city has never been revered by anyone."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "Once on a particular island, you can easily get around on foot or rent a car for more in-depth exploring.", can we conclude that "It's impossible to get around by car on the island."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no