Question:
Based on the premise "The rules are promulgated with the authority provided in the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.", can we conclude that "The rules contain the authority that the Communications Act added to constitution."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: It would maybe give us a start.

Sentence B: It might give them a start because it is helpful.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Within broad federal statutory and regulatory guidelines, each state (1) establishes its own eligibility standards,
Every state has it only eligibility standards with federal guidelines.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
But if you climb the maze of steep narrow streets into the upper part, you'll find peaceful, shady squares.

Here is a hypothesis:
There are peaceful squares in the upper part beyond the narrow streets.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: We overlooked Mr. Clinton's past indiscretions--he was hardly the first politician with testosterone overload--on the condition that he pursue his agenda and postpone his next dalliance until after he left the White House.

Sentence 2: Clinton had seven past indiscretions.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Stephanopoulos rephrased the rape charge as a question about the relevance of candidates' private lives."
Hypothesis: Stephanopoulous emphasized that the rape charge must be considered at face value.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no