Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Sorry, Dingman, as much sense as you make, I'm keeping my head firmly in the sand, where it's been for the last 35 years. As an insider in a capacity professional ethics keeps me from revealing, I learned very quickly how corrupt Alaska politics was, and remains. I forgot about the politicians, saved my money, and kept my sanity. Now I'm moving out of state. Alaska isn't worth the effort. I realize I'm part of the problem but, in conventional terms, there isn't any solution. Things are far too degenerated for that. As St. Ronnie once said, "If it's going to take a bloodbath, let's get it over with." He was speaking about young protestors, of whom I was one. How deliciously ironic I can quote him approvingly now.
[A]: Yes

[Q]: Excellent piece. People don't realize that it is ultimately the consumer who is pinched by these so-called business-only taxes; they are more or less pass-thru charges that hurt businesses (impairing their ability to compete with companies not exposed to the same taxes), workers (when costs of being in business go up, companies lay off workers), and consumers who pay higher prices for the same stuff as they did before. Enough is enough. Perhaps the hostile tax environment may be part of the reason that the economy is so services oriented in Oregon. A lot of the Fortune 500 companies have left. The problem with such a services-oriented economy is that it is not very flexible. So, when economic downturns come around every 8 years, or so, the Oregon and other services-oriented economies (e.g. Arizona) is hit harder than the national average; a lot of the money used to pay for those services is sourced from discretionary income. In recessions, people have less discretionary consumption.
[A]: No

[Q]: I'm hope you're right, that the extreme exaggeration of one side of a multi-sided issue was just for effect. We don't have to choose sides on this issue. We can sympathize with the falsely accused and with the real victims of rape, both. This isn't an issue that benefits from heavy handedness. It's not either-or.
[A]:
No