We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: If a person wasn't convicted then they surely wouldn't be murdered by the state.
Sent2: killing someone who has raped them or hurt a family member, while some of these reasons would definitely require being locked up the death penalty does not seem right for alot of situations

Ex Output:
Not similar

Ex Input:
Sent1: So how about we stop a penalty that has executed innocents?
Sent2: The fact is that as long as we have a death penalty (the only Western nation to have it), we will execute innocents with the guilty.

Ex Output:
Similar

Ex Input:
Sent1: Once the danger is gone killing a person is simply murder.
Sent2: No letting the family or friends of the victim kill the convicted person might be childish revenge.

Ex Output:
Not similar