Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: It was acid. Just not a melt your face off type acid. It bleached their skin and discolored their hair and clothing. It likely also affected them mentally, but it's debatable if it made them crazy or just proved that they were. It is implied to be the same Ace chemical factory that the Joker is said to have fall in to make him as pale green as we know him. The significance of the scene is to establish that Joker maybe somehow also actually cared about Harley instead of just toying with her. His face before jumping down seems to show some internal conflict, as of he himself disliked that he felt something for her, which pushed him to save her against his normal desire to kill people. It's also to establish how Harley became like she did, her look. That she voluntarily became like that, out of a type of mad love for Mistah J. Unlike her recent comic reboot where he threw her into the acid against her will. The comics make him rapier than the movie. Then again, as this is a flashback of an "unreliable narrator" like batshit crazy Harley, we don't know if that's an accurate flashback. For one, she wouldn't have been able to see what Joker does after she fell. Line of Sight issues. <sep> Q: what is the significance of the acid scene in "Suicide Squad"? A: The significance of the scene is to establish that Joker maybe somehow also actually cared about Harley instead of just toying with her Q: Why did it look like blue and red paint around them when they were kissing? A: It was acid. Just not a melt your face off type acid. It bleached their skin and discolored their hair and clothing <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: I thought it looked a bit like milk, what about you?

Ex Output:
No

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: We don't know. All we know is that Chiron assaulted him with the chair. Certainly he was injured but we don't know the severity of the injuries. Given that Chiron is only sent to juvie it's extremely unlikely that Terrel was killed. Thus a charge of the Assault variety would seem likely but that is also unknown. We also don't know how long Chiron was in juvie but most age out of the juvenile system at 18, assuming he was tried as a minor. However, there is a 10 year time jump between the assault and when we see Chiron again so any sentence would have been less than that since Chiron has now relocated to another city, is considerably larger than before and is now established as a drug dealer. <sep> Q: What happened to Terrel?

Ex Output:
Yes

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: He had visited the cafe as Harold Finch previously and made the same order with Grace. He then repeated the visit in his Professor Whistler identity and was recognised by the waitress. Samaritan could hear what the waitress said to him as well. Enough was the same for Samaritan to draw a line between the two identities. Bear in mind, in an early episode that Finch mentions how a series of almost totally unrelated facts are linked together by the Machine to determine the perpetrator of a crime. It doesn't take much if you can see and hear everything (and process it quick enough) to spot the connections. Perhaps it wasn't entirely conclusive, but nobody ever said that Samaritan insists on absolute proof before choosing an action. Once that connection was made, Samaritan could have analysed facial markers, his gait while walking, his voice records etc to achieve whatever level of proof it determined necessary to define Harold as a threat and to send its assets after him. <sep> Q: How did Finch's cover identity get blown?

Ex Output:
Yes