In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Ex Input:
Comment: A tremendous and dedicated servant to the public, his district and Alaska overall. You never had to question where Johnny was coming from. I remember in the 1980's when Johnny was running and there was a very dirty whisper campaign about him being gay being run by an unscrupulous campaign consultant who is still in the business. My parents, long time residents of Fairview, both stood up for Johnny and let him run their picture in his campaign literature along with a personal statement of support. My dad died when he was 90 but my mom, Helen is still alive at 96 and often mentions Johnny when I see her. I was always very proud of them for that.

Ex Output:
Agree

Ex Input:
Comment: I agree that the attacks are over smoke and mirrors however I dont agree that the government are hypocrites in talking about the middle and working classes and tax fairness.

I think they are serious about the dangers of income disparity and see it s a threat as well as people feeling left out of whatever benefits accrue from trade and an improved economy..They have taken steps to address this however the opposition and press have dragged around one red herring after another to try to distract from this.

Ex Output:
Disagree

Ex Input:
Comment: I've attempted to try and understand why this commission is necessary. My main source of information is the CBC because, they seem to have gone all in with respect to the indigenous narrative this year.
So, apparently the reason some commissioners quit and why indigenous peoples are dismayed are because the commissioners should have been victims as well. I'm reducing a rather complex issue but it appears the main focus of this inquiry is to let the victims be heard. By themselves.
I think we're going in circles here. And time and money will be spent with no satisfactory result. Again.

Ex Output:
Agree