Question: Sentence A: One factor that can increase the time to install a scrubber is competition for resources with other emission control projects.

Sentence B: No factors can increase the time it takes to install a scrubber.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: but we can do this tax sheltered annuity that's the only thing that's saving us
Our tax sheltered annuity is really hurting our business.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
The regal, extravagant Comedor de Gala (Ceremonial Dining Room), built for the wedding of Alfonso XII and his second wife, Maria Cristina in 1879, seats 145 guests.

Here is a hypothesis:
Comedor de Gala was built for a funeral and sits thousands of people.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Adopting a Comprehensive, Integrated, Multi-Pollutant By reducing emissions of the three key sources of air pollution at the same time, the Clear Skies Initiative will produce environmental results more effectively and efficiently than the current labyrinth of overlapping and uncoordinated single-pollutant requirements.

Sentence 2: There is only a single problem that causes air pollution.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
They appeared to be in an argument.

Does it follow that "They were fighting about their plan."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "But what will federal drug agencies do?", can we conclude that "What will the federal drug agencies leave aside?"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no