Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: The legislature is NOT fiscally conservative, nor were Palin or Parnell. Knowles was the last conservative we had and he was a democrat While I applaud Walker for trying to solve this, he has not addressed the bloated state government really - a 30%+ Reduction in Force is needed to get us back in line with income
Example Output: No

Example Input: The Republican party establishing demonstrating why Trump is so popular. We are at war with Radical Islam. Wishing it away isn't going to make the mean people stop. Until we take a much tougher stance thing will get worse before they get better. Restricting immigration from Islamic countries that harbor radicals is common sense.

Allowing unfettered immigration from countries that hate us is a stupid idea. One that has and will come to harm us.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: I will guarantee you more subjugated people died at the hands of Japanese soldiers in the name of Japanese imperialism than died in the bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima combined. And they didn't die quickly like most of the atomic bombing casualties. So many people like to talk about those bombings like they were the most horrific acts of WWII. Not even close. The war in the Pacific and on the Western front both pale in comparison to the scale and savagery with which the Germans and Russians fought each other on the Eastern front. By most accounts 2 million soldiers and civilians died in the Battle of Stalingrad alone.
Example Output:
Yes