instruction:
We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
question:
Sent1: The death penalty is gives the ability to off killers and murderers, as, if they were given life in parole, they have the ability to escape and continue their crimes.
Sent2: So, when someone gets the death penalty, they chose their own fate by committing the crime.
answer:
Not similar

question:
Sent1: The person who said that the death penalty should be used for people who are convicted of multiple-burglaries sounds like a complete knucklehead.
Sent2: When someone mentions a criminal deterrence factor with death sentences, it sounds like a bad joke or total ignorance.
answer:
Not similar

question:
Sent1: So should we be able to impose the sentence of life without parole, all the while understanding that we may have put an innocent man in prison for life?
Sent2: It is also possible for an innocent person to be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, but nobody is making the argument to stop sending people to prison.
answer:
Similar