Problem: There's a -- no, look, there's a systemic problem. Health-care costs are on the rise because the consumers are not involved in the decision-making process. Most health-care costs are covered by third parties. And therefore, the actual user of health care is not the purchaser of health care. And there's no market forces involved with health care.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Heath care is inexpensive"?

A: No

Problem: I was hunting in Iowa last year with a sheriff from one of the counties there, and he pointed to a house in back of us, and said, "See the house over? We just did a drug bust a week earlier, and the guy we arrested had an AK-47 lying on the bed right beside him. "

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Some midwestern folks possess firearms"?

A: Yes

Problem: Well, the strongest First Amendment argument is about the retrospective extension, because of a fundamental change that occurs when Congress extends subsisting copyrights, rather than when Congress legislates prospectively. When Congress legislates prospectively, it has no way to know who's going to benefit from its extension.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "First Amendment has a q"?

A:
No