Q: Given the sentence "A little boy in a green shirt is about to cross the bridge at the playground." can we conclude that "A little boy is running to his friend at the playground."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: Sentence 1: A little boy in a green shirt is about to cross the bridge at the playground. Sentence 2: A little boy is running to his friend at the playground.

Q: If "Three people walk past a red brick building." does that mean that "Three people walk past a building."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: yes
Chain-of-thought: Walking past a red brick building is walking past a building.

Q: Premise: "Pedestrians in a shaded walkway."
Hypothesis: "People stood in the shade to avoid the sun."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: Just because Pedestrians in a shaded walkway doesn't mean they are trying to avoid the sun.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two people play a game at a carnival."
Hypothesis: "A man is trying to win a bear for a girl at a carnival game."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought:
Gender of the two people could be anything other than a man and a girl.