Problem: OPTIONS:
- blast earthquakes
- earthquakes close to the surface
- deep earthquakes
- earthquakes more than 6.8 Richter scale
Q: Read the following article and answer the question. Article: The Kingdome in Seattle was destroyed on March 26, 2000. It was taken down to make room for a new stadium. The blast from the falling building caused the earth to shake as if an earthquake had happened Scientists placed more than 200 earthquake recorders in the earth to measure the movement. They found which parts of the city shook the most. This information helped them know which parts of the city would be damaged in a real earthquake at an early time. A real earthquake happened on February 28, 2001 in Seattle. The Nisqually earthquake was 6.8 on the Richter scale(6.8). It damaged the same parts of Seattle that scientists had predicted from the pulling down of the Kingdome. It was a plate quake. It started deep in the earth, 37 miles below the surface on the Juan de Fuca Plate. Sometimes, huge plates under the earth cause earthquakes when the plates move against each other suddenly. Scientists have learned that deep earthquakes have very few aftershocks . The Nisqually earthquake had only 4 ones. Another earthquake in California that was close to the surface had over 120 aftershocks. Scientists do not know why the deep earthquakes have fewer aftershocks. Scientists plan to blast in the ground near Seattle with the purpose of testing the plate. The shockwaves from the blast will jump off the plate and give them an idea of where the plate is and how it is moving. This will give them more information in case another real earthquake hits the area. Question: According to the passage, _ have the most aftershocks Answer:
Answer: earthquakes close to the surface
Problem: OPTIONS:
- She is only interested in rock climbing.
- She is a girl with many talents.
- Rock climbing has affected her study.
- She has won gold medals in several matches.
Q: Read the following article and answer the question. Article: Grace Kane hangs onto an Olympic dream of clinging to a granite wall by her fingertips 70 feet from the ground. The fearless girl is only 10, but already has scaled great heights in the sport of rock climbing. Last week, Kane won a bronze in the 11andyounger sport class at the USA Climbing Youth National Championships in Atlanta. She was the only competitor of the 31 there with no climbing coach or topflight facilities in which to train. Climbing will become an exhibition at the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics in Brazil. The hope of enthusiasts is that the sport will gain full status in 2020."I'm already training for that," said Kane. "Climbing is my passion, my love, and I want to make something of it." Her dad took her to climb rocks on her fourth birthday for the first time and today he can't keep up with her, "It's the freedom to let loose," she said. "When I'm up there, I'm so focused and don't hear anything. I always feel comforted knowing people are supporting me." The bronze in Atlanta qualified Kane for the USA team and November's International Championships in Ecuador. That's a trip she might have to miss because it's too expensive. Kane held a backyard music concert---she played the guitar and the piano and wrote inspirational songs---and raised $600 for her $1,500 trip to Atlanta. She's also been sponsored by a shoe company, but must rely heavily on donations from family and friends for travel expenses. Her mom Heather Kane said the family has chosen "to do whatever we need to help her achieve her goals". One of Grace's biggest challenges is finding balance in her life. There's school, her music and church to fit around climbing. "Climbing is going to mean sacrificing things other kids might pursue," Grace said. "But it doesn't bother me. It's like playing the piano; you can't take a break or you'll lose your touch." Question: Which of the following is TRUE about Grace Kane? Answer:
Answer: She is a girl with many talents.
Problem: OPTIONS:
- they are convenient and popular though they are slow
- they help to keep the friendly relationship between people
- most people cannot keep up with the development of technology
- modern means of communication does too much harm
Q: Read the following article and answer the question. Article: Online Communication In an age when technology moves faster than most can keep up with, a small group of people still remain in the time of old-fashioned letter. Frankly speaking, I was once certain that traditional letters could never be replaced by other means of communication. But a story about online communication changed my mind. An old man, who suffered a lot from Parkinson's disease, was not able to talk clearly and could hardly write his name. Living totally alone, he managed to keep in touch with nearly all the members of his family. How did he achieve this? He clicked out words on his computer keyboard. I, therefore, managed to get an E-mail box as soon as the opportunity came. My life changed. E-mail, and all online communication, is something truly different. It has capabilities that few other products can match. E-mail is convenient. It takes less time with its fast speed and 24-hour connection. The slow postal service is no match. If you wouldn't want to have a face-to-face talk with your manager, you might talk with him through E-mail even if you are in the same office. Naming all the good things about online communication is not easy. But wait. E-mail can be inconvenient. It can waste time and energy. Just think what may happen when you take a short vacation and return to find your e-mail box filled with 200 unread messages. You could easily spend half a day clearing _ ads. Then, online communication will keep us staying at our computer while it connects us to distant strangers. Once we throw ourselves into the machine, we may forget the human touches we once held so dear. I'm sure there is and always will be a place for the old-fashioned letter, phone call, and face-to-face meeting... even in the world of modern communication. As I listen to the sound of the modem , I was excited at stepping out to the outside world but, at the same time, I sensed a loss of control over something valuable in my personal life. Question: According to the writer, traditional means of communication will never disappear because _ . Answer:
Answer:
they help to keep the friendly relationship between people