Problem: Here is a premise:
detecting material misappropriations is an objective of control over safeguarding of assets, understanding this type of control can be essential to planning the audit.

Here is a hypothesis:
Material misappropriations occur commonly and are easy to detect.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: ENTERTAINMENT

Sentence 2: There are lots of entertainment options available for kids.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
and uh there wasn't a thing they could do you know they'd take her down to the juvenile hall and then they'd have to let her go and she'd be back doing it

Does it follow that "They would have to let her go from juvenile hall and then she would go right back to doing it because her parents don't care."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If That is not a Salamonca, said Jon., can we say that "Jon thought it was not Salamonca. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"I loved everything about talking to the folks who schlepped there on a Sunday morning; the comic effect of having a guy dressed like McGruff, the Crime Dog from public service ads, standing behind Dole."
Hypothesis: Having a guy dressed like the Crime Dog McGruff had a certain comedic effect.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: The great man had impressed her.

Sentence 2: The man had shown great feats of strength, which is why she was impressed.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell