In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: The GOP doesn't act on their values vs the left that doesn't even pretend to have any values. That's not a very tough call to make Ryan. Hillary Clinton will be indicted that much has become clear and crazy Bernie da Bomber wasn't even a successful senator...and values? No one ran from his values faster than Bernie. But lets start with the crazy part:

He wrote in the 1970s that the country was close to experiencing a nuclear apocalypse or "death by poison gas." He claimed cervical cancer was caused by women not experiencing enough orgasms

When he launched his campaign in May, this economic illiterate blamed the abundance of consumer goods for child hunger

Don't forget how much women love being raped because Bernie hasn't.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: "Arson in the second degree
164.315
A person commits the crime of arson in the second degree if:

By knowingly engaging in the manufacture of methamphetamine, the person causes fire or causes an explosion that damages ...Any property of another and the damages to the property exceed $750"

I think we need to add 'hash oil manufacturing' to this Oregon statute. Too many stoned idiots are out there playing chemist.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: No. You say he's made cakes for gay people before. You claim that as fact. How many has he made?

Nice buzzwords. Sounds to me like this man's faith "triggers" you. Why is it you "SJWs" never want your justice for the Christians?

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****