Here is an email: In reviewing the key items of your business review with Jeff Skilling, he had some issues with your new Broadband business. Please provide me with some more detail as follows: It was mentioned that we had spent around $13 million thus far on dark fiber. How much of the resultant capacity has been sold? Are we laying the dark fiber at risk? In other words are we taking a long position in dark fiber. What is our capacity situation today? Do you have a business plan for this new venture..ie what is the anticipated capital expenditures annually for this venture. Who are the customers? What is the expected return? What is the payback on our investment, etc. Who approved the formation of this new venture and the capital commitment? Anything else that will help me get a clear understanding of what we have and where we are going with it.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Broadband Business
Q: I received a message that there will be a surprise lunch for Rich Jolly on Friday, March 29 from 11:30 to 1:00pm in ECN46C1. Rich is retiring after 35 years of service. Everyone is invited. Thanks, Kim.
Propose a subject line
A: Surprise lunch for Rich Jolly
IN: At the request of Jake Staffel, I am attaching our proposed form of Non-Disclosure Agreement. If the enclosed meets with your approval, please sign the NDA and return it to me via fax (713) 646-3490. If you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (713) 853-3399.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: NDA - Paperloop Inc.
IN: This is an email
You have received this message because someone has attempted to send you an e-mail from outside of Enron with an attachment type that Enron does not allow into our messaging environment. Your e-mail has been quarantined and is being held at the MailSweeper server. Sender:

What is the subject?

OUT: An Inbound Message For You Has Been Quarantined
QUESTION: Russ and Richard: The referenced agreement was sent to you for execution on December 7, 2000. We have never received an executed original of the agreement or the guaranty from Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc. We have called on several occasions to locate these instruments. Please let us know if there is a problem.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: ISDA Master Agreement between Enron Corp. ("Enron") and Lehman Bros. Finance S.A. ("Lehman")
IN: NGI's Daily Gas Price Index published : October 29, 2001 ALJ Clears Transwestern of Market Power Charges A FERC administrative law judge has found no improprieties, nor evidence of the exercise of market power in negotiated rate contracts between Transwestern Pipeline and two shippers on its system, which resulted in the shippers being charged as much as $27/MMBtu last February, far in excess of the pipeline's allowed transportation rate of 38 cents/MMBtu (RP97-288-009). ALJ Jacob Leventhal had only one fault to find, and that was with Transwestern's method of posting capacity. The judge said, and Transwestern agreed, to modify its tariff "so that all posting, bidding and award procedures are set forth in a separate provision with an appropriate caption" on its Internet bulletin board. Shippers had said that reviewing capacity on the Transwestern web site was "a tortuous process." Indicated Shippers claimed Transwestern's inadequate capacity posting and award procedures did not provide all interested parties with an opportunity to bid for the capacity that was available. While "both Indicated Shippers and (FERC) Staff find it curious that SET (Sempra Energy Trading) and Richardson (Products Co.) were the sole bidders on the contracts awarded to each of them...curiosity does not translate into proof," the judge said. Witnesses in the expedited hearing testified no bids were considered in advance of the capacity posting. The judge subsequently found the capacity was awarded in a manner consistent with Transwestern's tariff. Similarly, Levanthal could find no evidence that Transwestern exercised market power in negotiating the rates with shippers or withholding or threatening to withhold capacity. The capacity was available at recourse rates, and the shippers knew those rates were available. "Staff's arguments really are criticisms of the posting and award procedures, but do not demonstrate the exercise of market power." The two shippers said they made a business decision to propose the "index-to-index" formula that produced the higher rates, rather than take the recourse rate "to minimize any risk on transportation options." The index-to-index formula refers to taking the difference between the daily published commodity prices at two different points and subtracting to get the transportation rate between them. In this case the two points were the San Juan Basin and the SoCal Needles delivery point. The case was set for expedited hearing last summer by the commissioners acting on staff recommendations.

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
NGI Article on TW Ruling