Q: Ted, Attached is a revised draft of a letter. Please review and let me know if you have any comments. Please note the following with respect to this issue: 1. We should make sure we have performed a gas analysis at each producers delivery point and are sure they are creating or contributing to the quality problem. I recommend attaching such gas analysis to this letter. 2. The BRG Petroleum Corp. contract doesn't give us any cause to send this letter. The contract requires BRG to meet the quality specs. of the the pipeline which receives the gas downstream of the Point of Delivery on the Confirm. Such Point of Delivery is at the wellhead and HPL is the downstream pipe. HPL's specs (unless they have changed, don't have a limitation on gas richness). 3. The Texlan letter will be slightly modified from the attached, since we will reference Force Majeure. 4. Do we have a accurate list of producer names and address? If you are okay with the letter, I can have a paralegal prepare the letters with addresses.
Propose a subject line
A: Nacogdoches Letter

Q: Hi, Think I forgot to tell you that Ken has a daughter, born almost two weeks ago, so your Grandparents tell me. Apparently Peg hasn't told Carolyn either .I've e-mailed her several times about the baby's arrival and she promised to let me know . Mom
Propose a subject line
A: forgot

Q: That was an interesting little conversation. I came back down and looked for you guys but you had both split. We should take a few minutes and plug John in on what happened at the end of that meeting when the power issues came up. I'm somewhat surprised at Bill's reaction, but what the hell, now we can run with Cunningham, and we know MKM's pulse on Hubbard (and Bill's). Pretty damn good end to the week, all things considered. DF
Propose a subject line
A: ?

Q: I would like to consider some counterparty-specific agreement to solve this problem. What do you think of a side agreement among both KN entities and Enron which specifies that a user ID and password have been issued to both of KN's legal entities jointly and severally and that transactions for certain products (e.g. all financial products) entered into under that user ID and password will be deemed executed by KN Trading (their financial trading entity) and all others will be deemed executed by KN Marketing (their physical entity)? Do you see any problems here? Issues re: joint & several liability under the ETA but not the Transactions? Let me know if you need further clarification of the problem. I haven't run this by Louise yet - she may raise system or commercial objections. Mark
Propose a subject line
A:
Assignment Issue