TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: The denialists are like those mammoths. Stuck on a shrinking island amidst a sea of information. Soon they'll all be extinct. Or learn to swim.

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Upon what evidence do you base your opinion that her response was "phony?" Or that it was "outrage?" The outrage that YOU are expressing shows an appalling lack of sensitivity on your part. Why defend rudeness?

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: *"Sorry Lars, but he's seriously mentally ill and can't help himself."*

You're right- you are indeed "Sorry," what you're *not* is a psychiatrist.

Here's the sad part (for you): whatever you failingly attempt to attribute to Trump, I'll still take over Hillz. Comparatively- he will always be less (fill in whatever you attribute to him).

You're right- there are other options on the ballot. Let's just not confuse an attack on Trump as tantamount for an endorsement to Hillz.

SOLUTION:
Non-identity-attack