Q: Given the sentence "A woman and a child are playing with a wooden truck and track set." can we conclude that "A woman and child are playing on the floor with toys."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: Playing with a truck and track set does not mean that a woman and child are playing on the floor. A wooden truck and track set may not be the only toys they play with.

Q: Given the sentence "A man in a gray coat is standing on a washed out bridge." can we conclude that "A man is standing on a washed out bridge after having lost everything in a flood."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: A man observing flood damage does not have to have lost everything.

Q: Can we conclude from "A group of people eat a meal in a crowded outdoor location." that "A group of people are surfing."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: no
Chain-of-thought: People cannot eat a meal and be surfing at the same time.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man is wearing a hat and a white shirt."
Hypothesis: "The man is wearing a hat."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: yes
Chain-of-thought:
You cannot be wearing a shirt and a hat at the same time.