We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: Machine gns are currently legal (despite an unconstitutional tax that is required to purchase one) and there has NEVER been a single case of a private citizen using a legally owned machine gun to commit a crime.
Sent2: Many thousands of Guns are stolen and used in GUN CREATED CRIME because most legal gun owners

Ex Output:
Not similar

Ex Input:
Sent1: Some people will argue that there should be little or no gun regulation, while others will argue that there should be as much regulation as the courts will allow.
Sent2: Perhaps if other types of firearms were as strictly regulated as machine guns

Ex Output:
Not similar

Ex Input:
Sent1: A law-abiding gun nut who uses their gun in committing a crime, is a criminal, and not law-abiding.
Sent2: gun control doesent solve anything in fact it makes crime go up because the criminals will always get their guns and your only disarming the law abiding citizens thus making them easy victims from the criminals.

Ex Output:
Not similar