instruction:
In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.
question:
Context: Objective analysis of surgical skill is necessary. A novel method of assessment using simple error analysis in synthetic models is examined for construct validity.', 'Two examination protocols were devised using synthetic models. These contained either a purpose made error or were representative of good surgical practice. Protocol one contained models of skin closure and minor operations. Protocol two in addition more complex procedures. Face validity was established by the approval of senior surgeons. Junior surgeons were recruited to undertake the assessment. A p value of less than 0.05 was deemed to be significant.', 'Eighty-nine surgeons were recruited. Both protocol one and two were able to discriminate between groups at statistically significant levels.\Question: Is the surgical error examination a novel method for objective technical knowledge assessment?
answer:
Construct validity has been established by showing that error analysis is able to distinguish surgeons with varying levels of experience.

question:
Context: The aim of this study was to investigate the attitudes and perceptions of staff radiologists regarding the incorporation of a nonanonymous peer review system at an academic hospital.', 'A questionnaire gauging knowledge of, attitudes toward, and perceptions regarding peer review was distributed to all staff radiologists at a large academic hospital. The survey was distributed before the implementation of a nonanonymous peer review system. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Responses were cross-tabulated according to subspecialty and number of years in practice.', 'The majority of respondents agreed that peer review is important for improving patient care (31 of 36 [86%]) and professional development (29 of 36 [81%]), but the vast majority (33 of 36 [92%]) believed that peer review should be anonymous. Twenty-six of 36 respondents (72%) believed that peer review will not be safe from malpractice issues, 24 of 36 (67%) agreed that it has the potential to damage interpersonal relationships within the department, and 15 of 36 (42%) believed that it may influence their job security or rankings within the department. Significant differences were identified between radiologists with more and fewer years of practice experience.\Question: Do survey of radiologist attitudes and perceptions regarding the incorporation of a departmental peer review system?
answer:
The incorporation of a nonanonymous peer review system generates anxiety and uncertainty within a radiology department. The investigation of physicians' attitudes toward and perceptions about peer review is important for understanding the potential impact not only on patient care but also on radiologists' relationships and psychology in the workplace.

question:
Context: To evaluate magnesium deficiency during and after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the role of intravenous magnesium therapy given in the early postinfarction period.', 'One hundred patients with AMI were randomly assigned to 2 equal groups and monitored over a 4-week period. The placebo group received intravenous dextrose solution and the trial group was given 15 g intravenous magnesium (62 mmol) over a 48-hour period. Serum magnesium levels were measured on days 1, 2, 4, and 6 after admission by calorimetry with methyl thymol blue.', 'The groups were comparable in prevalence of risk factors for coronary artery disease and other acute parameters of AMI. The serum magnesium levels of a group of 50 controls were higher (1.61 +/- 0. 21 vs 1.23 +/- 0.27mEq/L) than in patients with AMI (P <.001). There was an increase in serum magnesium levels in the trial group on day 2 (1.73 +/- 0.27 vs 1.29 +/- 0.28 mEq/L; P <.001) as well as on day 4 (1.62 +/- 0.25 vs 1.38 +/- 0.36 mEq/L; P <.001). The trial group also showed significantly lower incidence of arrhythmias (8% vs 34%) and death (4% vs 20%). The mortality rate from pump failure was reduced in the trial group (4% vs 14%).\Question: Is benefits of magnesium in acute myocardial infarction : timing crucial?
answer:
The serum magnesium levels in patients with AMI were lower compared with controls. The administration of intravenous magnesium to patients in the immediate postinfarction period is cardioprotective and decreases the incidence of arrhythmia, pump dysfunction, and death. Thus intravenous magnesium is a safe, effective, and inexpensive modality of treatment in AMI.