FYI... I just wanted to let you know that I have been working with the settlements group in order to put approx. $800,000.00 into the Central and East desk books for Devon penalties that have been incurred over the last year. Settlements should be talking with the Risk group in order to get this done soon. We are also working to determine the Pipeline cash out as a result of Panaco's imbalance over the last year. After talking with legal it appears that we do have remedy to recoup cash out from Panaco. I'll keep you informed when I have more information. If you have any questions please let me know. Mark
Answer: Devon and Panaco
Here is an email: Here is my first cut at a proposed form of amendment. I have added a rep and an additional Event of Default to cover the 'Lien" issue in light of the fact that Barrett's Credit Agreement restricts them from entering into any agreement that contains a negative pledge. I winged the amendment to the Confirmations since I have not seen them yet. Please call me with any comments. Carol
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Barrett Amendment
Q: Good Afternoon All! I will be in a class tomorrow afternoon from 11:30 am - 2:30 pm. I will be in the office before and after the class. Call me if you have any questions. Thank you.
Propose a subject line
A: Keegan Farrell - Class Tomorrow
IN: TheMarket for Lemons and the Price of Dishonesty=20 The Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics was awarded thisyear to three economi= sts: George Akerlof, Joseph Stiglitz and Michael Spence,who made significan= t contributions to modeling markets with information asymmetry.In many case= s in a given market sellers or buyers may have exclusiveinformation that is= not available to the counter party. The best-known examplecomes from the [= paper by Akerlof, The Market for "Lemons": QualityUncertainty and the Marke= t Mechanism, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84,(1970), pages 488-500. =20 An owner of a used car can form a good idea of the qualityof his vehicle. H= e has much better information if his car is a lemon. As bothgood and bad us= ed car have to sell at the same price - it is impossible for anaverage buye= r to distinguish between good and bad merchandise - they sellers ofgood use= d cars are driven out of the market. Most traded used cars will belemons. O= f course, there are ways to mitigate the problem: an owner of a goodused ca= r may send signal to the buyer by offering him a guarantee or absorbingthe = cost of inspection.=20 Hiring is a similardecision. As Michael Spence wrote in his paper Job Marke= t Signaling,Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, (1973), pages 355 - 374, to= hire somebodyis frequently to purchase a lottery ticket. The employer cann= ot directlyobserve the productivity of a potential hire. "What he does obse= rve is aplethora of personal data in the form of observable characteristics= andattributes of the individual, and it is these that must ultimately dete= rminehis assessment of the lottery he is buying." The observable characteri= stics of an individual may be immutable (raceand, generally, sex) but in so= me cases certain attributes are alterable. A candidatecan modify such chara= cteristics as education and job history. Some economistssay, tongue-in-chee= k, that some candidates who attended top schools and spentmany painful hour= s studying useless subjects signal their willingness to dowhatever it takes= to succeed. Another way to send a signal about one's qualityis to find a j= ob with a top firm at the beginning of one's career and tosucceed in this f= irm before moving on. This provides a useful lesson to anybodywho plans to = be in the labor market at some points in his or her life: thereputation of = the current employer is critical to future employmentopportunities and shou= ld be defended at any cost. Honesty, at the end of theday, is an imperative= dictated as much by morality as by one's self interest. =20 - The Market for Lemons and the Price of Dishonesty.doc=20 - The Market for Lemons and the Price of Dishonesty.doc

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Newsletter
IN: This is an email
Greg, Attached is a clean and redlined version of the Gateway Interconnect Agreement. Please review before forwarding to Pace to make sure the ownership concept is in accordance with your negotiations. Please call me if you have any questions and I will forward the Rio Nogales later today.

What is the subject?

OUT: Gateway Project
Joe: Did you ever contact them about the confirms that they sent to us? Are they now signing our confirms? Please advise as to what, if anything, I need to be doing on this. Thanks. Carol
Answer:
CLECO