TASK DEFINITION: Given a paragraph about movies, and a set of conversational question answers about the paragraph, answer a follow-up question from the paragraph. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.
PROBLEM: CONTEXT: Mostly, Ron works in the department because of the Rule of Funny. Having a dour anti-government personality is great for Leslie to play off of. However, Ron also keeps his job because he wants to make the government as inefficient as possible. He doesn't just see high spending as bad but everything the government actually gets done. He keeps his position so he can slow things down and so he can hire inefficient people. This is especially highlighted in his episodes with Tom and April, who he hired because they were inefficient and unmotivated. <sep> Q: Why does Ron Swanson work at the Parks Department? A: Mostly, Ron works in the department because of the Rule of Funny <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: what is the rule of funny excactly?

SOLUTION: Having a dour anti-government personality

PROBLEM: CONTEXT: They didn't change the whole climax scene. In one version Rudra's father saying him that the girl he loved is actually his step sister, so he can not marry her. On the other hand, the scene is same but there is no dialogue as it is muted and audience needs to understand from their reaction and background score. This change was made because the film got poor audience response due to the dialogue delivery of the conversation. <sep> Q: What are the differences between two climax of Solo? A: In one version Rudra's father saying him that the girl he loved is actually his step sister, so he can not marry her <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What happens in the other version?

SOLUTION: On the other hand, the scene is same but there is no dialogue as it is muted and audience needs to understand from their reaction and background score

PROBLEM: CONTEXT: We don't know. All we know is that Chiron assaulted him with the chair. Certainly he was injured but we don't know the severity of the injuries. Given that Chiron is only sent to juvie it's extremely unlikely that Terrel was killed. Thus a charge of the Assault variety would seem likely but that is also unknown. We also don't know how long Chiron was in juvie but most age out of the juvenile system at 18, assuming he was tried as a minor. However, there is a 10 year time jump between the assault and when we see Chiron again so any sentence would have been less than that since Chiron has now relocated to another city, is considerably larger than before and is now established as a drug dealer. <sep> Q: What happened to Terrel? A: We don't know <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What happened to Chiron after this?

SOLUTION:
Given that Chiron is only sent to juvie it's extremely unlikely that Terrel was killed