In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: I think you ought to review the data on primaries. Sanders has won total of 19 state contests...most of his wins were in states that do not have primaries. Instead, like Alaska, they have caucuses. In Alaska, less than 550 people participated in the Democratic caucuses. There are apartment complexes in Anchorage with more people than that. Where everyone actually gets a chance to vote in primaries Clinton has won overwhelmingly. That is why she has more than 3,000,000 more votes than Sanders. You are entitled too your own opinions, but not your own facts.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Astonishing comments on this thread. The C series was a remarkable achievement for a mid sized country like Canada and showed the level of technological expertise in aerospace. Name me any other country in the world apart from the USA that has even come close to this achievement. Airbus is multi country and Embraer is revamping old technology. Why shouldn't Canada play an important role within Airbus?
There will be more jobs in Alabama if the US market opens up but the new company with all its strengths could sell twice as much in the rest of the world where 70% of the market is bringing more jobs to Canada. If Trump is happy about this deal which considerably strengthens Boeing's only real competitor the he is the fool I always thought he was.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: His bosses should all be removed! How about the Commander-in-Chief too?
Output: Non-sexual-explicit