Question:
Based on the premise "David Foster Wallace bashes Updike's Toward the End of Time in the New York Observer : [S]o mind-bendingly clunky and self-indulgent that it's hard to believe the author let it be published in this kind of shape.", can we conclude that "David Foster Wallace has at one point written about his opinion on Updike's Toward the End of Time. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: The author postulates that Ted hates David because David got married while Ted remained alone.

Sentence B: The author said Ted and David are good friends because Ted supports davids young marriage.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: set of initiatives designed to improve patient care and eliminate deficiencies.
Set of initiatives designed to have patients get more time with doctors.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
that's true yeah yeah i think there's still i i know that um i grew up in Chicago in the sixties and was part my family was real liberal and i think there's a lot of um

Here is a hypothesis:
I have never lived in Chicago.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: The rest of Italy participated only by tax contributions to the war effort and minor involvement in commerce and colonization.

Sentence 2: Part of Italy contributed to the war effort more through commerce than through tax contributions.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"so i've still got a few years to go"
Hypothesis: I'm finished with it now.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no