Question: Sentence A: Take time to see beyond the streets filled with traffic and you will be amply rewarded.

Sentence B: You'll find the parts of the city beyond the busy areas to be very rewarding.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: and um they they gave you a paper right there and they said if you were out drinking or if you went out for a good time last night go ahead and write down that you did have beer or you did have alcohol or if you are on medicine go ahead and write down what medicine you are on
They didn't want people to be testing for false positives.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
DHS might consider new scientific and technical personnel tracks to encourage recruitment, retention and rewarding of individuals with critical knowledge, or Congress may wish to provide the new department with some limited term appointment authority.

Here is a hypothesis:
DHS might consider new scientific techniques to sell drugs.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: They worked much longer and harder than our own workers.

Sentence 2: Our workers were the harder workers.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Rule 78(a)(2)) requires the Commission to prepare an analysis of the effect of these rules on competition.

Does it follow that "The analysis must contain no less than three examples of possible effects the rules in question may have on competition. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "The main square in Monte pleasantly evokes yesteryear.", can we conclude that "Monte contains a quaint main square that is pleasant."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes