In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: (Pinker has denied the accusation, arguing that he is trying to understand infanticidal behavior, not condoning it.) Choices: 1. Pinker prohibited them from behaving like that ever again. 2. Pinker did not realize they would misunderstand his intentions. 3. Pinker denies the accusations saying he was understanding the behavior.

Output: 3

Input: Consider Input: Statement: The anti-HMO strategy is also evidence of the pernicious influence of Anecdotal Politics. Choices: 1. There is a strategy to fight HMOs. 2. There is a strategy to fight HMOs that has been highly successful. 3. No one is sure what to do with HMOs.

Output: 1

Input: Consider Input: Statement: Horses to be found back in the rough country, hidden away in the maze of pocket canyons where there was water and enough browning grass to keep them from straying. Choices: 1. In the maze of pocket canyons there is a drought and sandy ground with no vegetation. 2. People put their horses in the maze of pocket canyons to prevent them from being detected. 3. In the maze of pocket canyons there was enough water and grass to keep horses from straying.
Output: 3