Instructions: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Input: that reimbursement rates for many services are already set below providers' costs. (See, e.g., Yelamanchili Decl. 10; Coughlin Decl. 7.) 6 . Plaintiffs seek to vindicate wha er a claim to quality services would be judicially manageable where the issue were other than whether rates have been set in consideration of cost of service. 16 . Whether federal regulations can create rights enforceable under 1983 is not at all clear. However, there are good reasons to think that they cannot. See Wright v. City of Roanoke Redev. & Hous. Auth., 479 U.S. 418, 437-38, 107 S.Ct. 766, 93 L.Ed.2d 781 (1987) (O'Connor, J., dissenting) (noting concerns with allowing regulations to create enforceable rights); S. Camden Citizens in Action v. N.J. Dep't of Envtl. Prot., 274 F.3d 771, 790 (3d Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>). 17 . For example, the Health Net of
Holding statements: (A) holding that regulations do not create enforceable rights when they are too far removed from congressional intent (B) holding that when regulations are intended to have different purposes and are not dependent on each other they are not intertwined (C) holding federal regulations have the force of law and may create enforceable rights (D) recognizing that these two recent supreme court decisions resolve the issue of whether federal regulations alone can create enforceable rights under 1983 (E) holding that because federal regulations have the force of law they may create enforceable rights under 1983
Output:
holding that when regulations are intended to have different purposes and are not dependent on each other they are not intertwined