In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: Next, we determine the total cost of delivery performed by the incumbent and a second firm that is assumed to be equally efficient. Choices: 1. The second firm is going to have a lower total cost of delivery. 2. We're just going to focus on determining the incumbent's total cost of delivery. 3. For the next step we look at both the incumbent's total cost of delivery and that of another firm that we will assume to be just as efficient.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: The Slums of Beverly Hills also walks a line between two genres, in this case coming-of-age sex comedy and autobiographical monologue. Choices: 1. Beverly Hills Slums split between two genres, one of coming-of-age sex comedy and autobiographical monologue. 2. The Slums of Beverly Hills never formed a rift of genres, instead only focusing on coming-of-age sex comedies. 3. The autobiographical monologue phenomenon is of greater intensity than the comedies of the Beverly Hills Slums.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: It would be impossible to name every place of interest in a guide of this size, so we aim to give you a representative overview of the country rather than an encyclopedic listing of must-see sites. Choices: 1. The guide isn't long enough to name every place because it would cost too much money. 2. It's possible to name every place of interest in this guide, we want to give an encyclopedic listing of must-see sites. 3. The guide is too small to list off every interesting place available.
[EX A]:
2