Premise:
"The bears are holding up what might be a dinner plate that says, United We Stand Divided We Ball, indicating a surprisingly open marriage or that the ink smeared."
Hypothesis: The bears' dinner plate supports open marriages.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: 1) In other words, there is a definitive number, according to the Pentagon. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Having a definite number is preferable to an estimation. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "There is no indication in section 717 or its legislative history that Congress intended to take such a narrow view of GAOas authority.", can we conclude that "Section 717 showed that Congress had intended to take a narrow view of GAO's authority."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: That's what happened on Face the Nation , where Gore campaign manager Donna Brazile accused Bradley of endangering African-Americans and all other minorities and Hispanics by trying to eliminate Medicaid.

Sentence B: Bradley was oblivious to the consecuences of eliminating medicaid.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: HHS' reporting and analysis of improper Medicare payments has helped lead to the implementation of several initiatives to identify and reduce such payments.
There were some improper Medicare payments.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
You _are_ Dave Hanson, therefore." "Don't try to deceive us," Nema suggested.

Here is a hypothesis:
"Do not attempt to fool us," Nema said.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes