IN: This is an email
Attached is a redline of the Bisti Assignment in Contribution Agreement (ECC to ECS). This version picks up a change in the indemnity section that was missed in the version e-mailed earlier. This change will be made in all 4 Assignment and Contribution Agreements.

What is the subject?

OUT: Assignment & Contribution
QUESTION: John, EGS are asking whether Orlando is yours for PRC and bonus purposes? Presumably no doubt about Wiggs et al. What's your view. They seem happy either way. Just want clarity. David
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Electro - Orlando Gonzales
We have reached resolution regarding the parking and mass transit issue. Until notified otherwise, the parking and mass transit subsidy will continue as an employee benefit. For those who have a payroll parking deduction, your deduction has been stopped. No deduction should occur on 12/31/01 payroll. In addition, you should receive a credit for the deduction taken for the 12/15 payroll. For those who incurred any out-of-pocket parking costs during the month of December, you may expense up to $89 for reimbursement. Beginning 1/1/02, parking and mass transit will continue as follows: WTC Parking: You should receive your parking pass in the mail. Payroll deductions will begin on the 1/15/02 paycheck. (No Action Req'd) Outside Parking Lots: Park at lot of your choice and pay out of pocket. Request reimbursement of up to $89 per month. (No payroll parking deduction will occur) Tri-Met and MAX employees: Passes are available for January. If you would like to pick up your pass, please see Debra Davidson. NOTE: Extra Tri-Met passes are available. If you would like to select mass transit as your parking option, please notify either Grace or myself before Friday, 12/21/01 EOB and we will insure a monthly pass is available. Validations: We will no longer validate parking passes, however, you are able to reimburse up to $89 per month for daily parking. If you have any questions, please let us know! ENA Human Resources Julie Kearney 503) 464-7404 Grace Rodriguez 503) 464-8321
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Parking & Mass Transit Resolution
Hi Dan, One more thing I want to mention. As you know, Enron has a confidentiality agreement with a competitor of Fuel Cell (I believe it is ONSI). The agreement has an exclusivity arrangement, which prevents the other company from chasing certain transactions without Enron. Once we really know what we are going to do with FCE, will it be necessary/advisable to waive the exclusivity provision to avoid any restraint of trade arguments? FYI, When I last discussed the other company with Ozzie and Heather on Friday, they were planning on calling the other company to tell them the general status without violating confidentiality obligations to FCE or CRRA. I will follow up to get the details of the discussion. Kay
Answer: FCE/Confidential
Here is an email: Attached please find Gas Daily daily prices for April/Oct 2001 for the Permian and Waha areas. The differential looks good for a support of our $.04 offer. Please let me know if you want me to pull more pricing information. TK
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Permian to Waha Differentials for Socal Discussions
QUESTION: Please include me on the Priority Dual Monitor list. I will be the product manager for trading Transwestern capacity on EnronOnline. In order to manage the product in Stack Manager and view pricing information, two monitors for the same CPU are required. Thanks.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Monitor Request