Problem: Here is a premise:
yeah these were young kids too they couldn't have been out of middle school

Here is a hypothesis:
Those involved were middle school age.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: During the past decade the AICPA and many accounting firms put too much emphasis on how they could grow their top line, bottom line, and earnings through pushing non-audit/consulting services and not enough time modernizing attest and assurance services that represent the franchise for CPAs on which the public relies.

Sentence 2: The AICPA does not care about growing their earnings.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
i just love it in fact i uh mow my lawn but there's a gigantic vacant field in back of us uh that belongs to Richland College

Does it follow that "I usually don't mow my lawn during the winter time."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If To what are we comparing idiocy?, can we say that "Are they comparing idiocy to multiple things?"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"ooh i hate that that's horrible"
Hypothesis: I hate that method, it is so horrible for us.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: including the classes of small entities subject to the rule and alternatives considered to reduce the burden on the small entities.

Sentence 2: Small entities are subject to the rule, and alternatives to reduce the burden were considered.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes