Subject: "time to discuss gas storage".

Body: Scott- Don Miller would like for me to get together with you to discuss several gas storage transactions that have been originated recently (in MI, LA and TX). I have been meeting with Jean Mrha and Laura Luce and their respective teams, but want to better understand a trading perspective on these assets. I'm more interested in your macro views than specifics related to each particular project. Please let me know a time that works for you (tomorrow or Friday would work best for my schedule). thanks,

Subject: "OBA Imbalance Sheet".

Body: Scott & Walt: A couple of things...I talked to Theresa today and the OBA Spreadsheet (or actually, Enron's imbalance sheet) needs to be changed for both October and November as follows: October: ENA purchased 300 mmbtu/d from Westport at the Bear Paw point beginning October 9. We need to add a column on the ENA sheet (i.e. similar to Phillips) showing that 300 mmbtu. Quantum - ENA did not purchase any gas from Quantum for October. We had some measurement of gas from Quantum throughout the month. This needs to go to imbalance between Quantum and Crestone. November: ENA is purchasing 1,000 mmbtu/d from Quantum. If Quantum produces more than 1,000 mmbtu/d that extra goes to imbalance between Quantum and Crestone. ENA is not purchasing Westport's gas at this time. I would be happy to make these changes, but I am unsure as to how this file affects your Meter Allocation report and I don't want to mess that one up!!! I'm copying Theresa on this memo....please feel free to add to it if I missed something. Thanks.

Subject: "Thoughts".

Body: Jim-I just wanted you to know that you are in my mind during these difficult times. I know how disappointing this all must be to you, but know that you have a lot of friends supporting you. Regards

Subject: "New ET&S Law Objectives".

Body:
Here's one for you to chew on for awhile. As we approach the transition to a new organizational structure in ET&S, let's rethink the role and competencies of the legal department. I'd like each of you to answer the following questions and circulate your answers to me and each other. To avoid having anyone's answers unduly influenced by anyone else's, please send your responses at 12 noon on Thursday. No, this isn't being graded, and doesn't affect the PRC process or any other process. I just want to get access to as much original thinking as possible. 1. What is the ET&S law dept. currently best at? (give one example). 2. What is the ET&S law dept. currently worst at? (give one example). 3. Without regard for any past objectives, what should our top 3 objectives be? (make these very specific--objectives like "We should manage legal and