Definition: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. The four incorrect answers are other holding statements. You should find the correct option. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Input: Amendment, federal power extend[s] to intrude upon the province of the Eleventh Amendment...." Seminole Tribe, 517 U.S. at 58-60, 116 S.Ct. 1114. Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has never held that private parties may sue states without Congress first passing implementing legislation under the Fourteenth Amendment, 5. Indeed, Seminole Tribe continues its discussion of the Fourteenth Amendment's "intrufsion] upon the province of the Eleventh Amendment" by stating that "therefore ... 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment allow[s] Congress to abrogate the immunity from suit guaranteed by that Amendment." Id. at 59, 116 S.Ct. 1114 (emphasis added); see Pennhurst, 465 U.S. at 99-100, 119-121, 104 S.Ct. 900 (citing Quern v. Jordan, 440 U.S. 332, 342, 99 S.Ct. 1139, 59 L.Ed.2d 358 (1979) (<HOLDING>)). Similarly, the Supremacy Clause dictates
Holding statements: (A) holding that 1983 does not override states eleventh amendment immunity (B) recognizing absolute immunity to suits under 42 usc 1988 (C) holding that a state is not a person under 42 usc 1983 (D) holding that suits under 42 usc 1983 do not override state immunity (E) holding that 1983 does not override a states eleventh amendment immunity
Output:
(D)