In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Le Pen represents France's last hope to remain French. She is being trashed by the globalists and their pet candidates because they fear another Brexit-style surprise. As usual, they are enlisting the services of their accomplices, the pollsters, in order to achieve the desired results. French voters need to give the elites a good swift kick in the cojones.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: I agree with Teresa Shook, who says, "Politics has no business basing decisions on religion covertly or overtly." I also agree that the legislators who failed to support this bill are "cowards," lacking the courage to do the right thing and caving in to the loud minority who would force their religious beliefs on the majority.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: This doesn't sound at all like you Stephen.........maybe I've missed something.
The institution /organisation wouldn't exist if it weren't for the individuals. I think your being a little too hard on yourself
A not so long ago piece by Josephine McKenna RNS Sex orgies, prostitution and porn claims shake the church in Italy, certainly sent child down my back [a problem displaying the full article] and has nothing to do with just a few apples in the barrel, the whole damned tree is contaminated.
It leaves nothing to the imagination to whatever else is hidden away.
There are no secrets in the corridors of the Vatican.
Be well.
Example Output:
Sexual-explicit