In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Let me give you an example: Comment: i am just sorry that khadr didnt get a bullet in the head before he blew the head off that innocent father because his islamic boogie skywizard told him to.
The answer to this example can be: Toxic
Here is why: This is a toxic comment because it advocates acts of violence.

OK. solve this:
Comment: You are right, the Church did not deal with this matter in a comprehensive way. I don't think there is a single reason for this.

Although child sexual abuse (CSA) is and has been a widespread phenomenon both culturally and historically, civil society did not deal with it comprehensively until very recently either.

The age to marry in the RCC according to CCL has been 14 for the longest time. So sexual contact with people fifteen and up could have been explained away as sexual misconduct/sin, and not abuse, that could be fixed by spiritual means (confession, prayer, etc). Remember, the overwhelming cases of abuse involved postpubertal individuals.

Every institution has a basic reflex to protect itself. Add to this the fear and disdain of scandal in the RCC, and the high regard for the secrecy of the confessional, and you have a strong incentive to keep things private or secret.

These are just a few reasons, but none of this justifies anything. But it is worth considering them.
Answer:
Non-toxic