Question: Sentence A: Are you proposing a third advertisement: Wanted, female crook, answering to the name of Rita?

Sentence B: All three of the advertisements are about chairs.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: stuff on the outside in to the inside
People on the outside should stay outside.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
of the effects uh you know whether it was justified or not i know that they probably felt like we were going in for a good cause i i feel like maybe they felt like we were doing the right thing to try and help maintain the democracy over there and and beat the communism but

Here is a hypothesis:
We were trying to help the democracy over there.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: In front of the building is a statue of the Duke of Wellington, resplendent in battle dress and cloak astride his trusty steed, Copenhagen.

Sentence 2: The Duke of Wellington is well known among the English population.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
and if i had it to do all over again i would do what you're planning to do like continue

Does it follow that "Given a choice i would drop out again."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "Insofar as the social insurance program applies to employees of the United States government, the terms and conditions are generally the same as the program for private employees.", can we conclude that "The terms and conditions vary greatly between the Government employees and private sector employees."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no