Attached is a memo that Rick plans to send out - I hope that attaching this makes it easy for you to take care of this. I am delivering to him a highlighted copy of the memo so that he will know about a few wording changes that I have made since the last time that he saw this in draft form. He is certainly free to make any other changes before it goes out. Call me with any questions.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Memo for Rick to send
Hi Kam, Could you send us your updated address? Yahoo says you still live on 4444 Westheimer, which I know is wrong. We would like to send you a wedding invite. Have a happy holiday. Take care, JR
Answer: Your Address
Here is an email: Mr. Lay, Recent developments with EBS are causing me significant concern. I became employed by Enron (EBS) as part of the acquisition of DataSystems Group, Inc. in 1999. Part of that employment agreement included a retention bonus, payable in three installments in March of 2000, 2001, and 2002. We were told that bonus was payable if we did not voluntarily terminate (quit) prior to those dates. With the highly uncertain future of EBS, I am faced with two likely scenarios: Scenario 1 - EBS terminates as part of a severance prior to February of 2002. I receive no bonus for 2001 after working countless hours of overtime to "save EBS". I receive no retention payment because I was severed prior to March 31. Scenario 2 - Enron divests EBS to a third party. Third party terminates employment with little or no severance. I receive no bonus for 2001 after working countless hours of overtime to "save EBS". I receive no retention payment because I was severed prior to March 31. As my wife and I both work for EBS, this is an even greater concern to me. At the recent all-employee meeting, you asked everyone to redouble their work, work harder and more than before to help pull Enron out of this current crisis. I find it difficult (as do those working for me) to commit to this effort while we're facing what appears to be almost certain personal disaster. We have been working tirelessly on the Microsoft deal since the beginning of the year. It now is beginning to look like we'll see no acknowledgement from Enron for the work. I would like to know what you and Enron can do to assuage the concerns my reports and I have over these issues. Thank you,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Concern about EBS
Q: Please be advised that the California Power Exchange Corporation has received a deposition subpoena from the California State Senate Select Committee to investigate price manipulation of the wholesale energy market. The subpoena seeks the testimony of George Sladoje, Chief Executive Officer, of the CalPX. Mr. Sladoje is scheduled to testify pursuant to the subpoena on April 2, 2002 at the legislative office Building, 1020 N Street, Room 288, Sacramento, California. The subpoena also seeks the production of the following documents, some of which may be considered confidential under Section 19.3.2 of the CalPX Tariff: 1. Any and all documents relating to the Market Monitoring Committee, including, but not limited to, any and all reports prepared by or for said Committee, notes, e-mail memorandum, correspondence, drafts, and documents supporting any Committee reports. 2. Any and all documents relating to the market compliance Unit including but not limited t, any and all reports prepared by or for said Committee notes, e-mails, memorandum, correspondence, drafts, and documents supporting any Committee reports. Counsel for the Senate Select Committee has stated that the confidential materials provided by CalPX in response to this subpoena will be treated by the Senate Select Committee in accordance with the terms of the May 15, 2001 letter from Senator Joseph L. Dunn that was previously posted on the CalPX web site. If you desire to assert a claim of confidentiality or privilege, you should direct your written statement by March 26, 2002 to the following:
Propose a subject line
A: Deposition Subpoena by the California State Senate Select Committee
IN: In order to deal with the online trading program as well as other issues that repeatedly arise, we need to make some modifications to our Master Swap Agreement Database. Foremost, we would like to open the Master Swap Agreement Database to any ECT, ECT Canada or ECT International employee that would like access to the information. This would include employees in the London, Oslo, Singapore, Portland and Buenos Aires offices. The only information we need to continue to restrict is the Legal and Credit comment section (attorney-client privilege issues). Access to this information would continue to be limited to Legal and Credit In addition, it also very critical that only Legal and Credit have access to the Portland General masters. Second, we will need to add some drop downs to deal with online trading issues. Online trading will commence by the end of the month and we need to have this information and access available by that time. In addition, we have remaining "kinks" in the database we need to resolve. Can you let me know when you would be available to meet to discuss the changes. Thanks for your help!

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Changes to our Master Swap Areement Database
IN: This is an email
Hi, I need your help. I would like you guys to prioritize the "first 10" and the "second 10" firms that we would like to change our existing trading agreements with to allow all of us to use ConfirmLogic. I would like this process to go forward even if the counterparty has not yet signed up for the module. To my mind, the legal change simply gives us both the option (and perhaps the preference, but not the obligation) to use the module to serve as a legal confirmation. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help speed up the process. As I understand it, only Sempra currently has proposed changes in front of them. I would like us to have proposed changes in front of the top 20 clients by September 20. Many thanks, Tom

What is the subject?

OUT:
Contract Amendments for ConfirmLogic