Input: In week 4, the Lions hosted their NFC North Division rivals the Minnesota Vikings. The Vikings took an early lead when Percy Harvin returned the opening kickoff 105 yards for a touchdown. The Lions responded with a 40-yard field goal by Jason Hanson. Minnesota's Blair Walsh then kicked a field goal from 49 yards out. Both teams kicked a field goal in the second quarter, first Minnesota's Blair Walsh from 27 yards out, then Detroit's Jason Hanson from 31 yards. The only scoring drive of the third quarter was when the Vikings' Marcus Sherels returned a punt 77 yards for a touchdown. The Lions scored the only points of the final quarter when quarterback Matthew Stafford completed a 1-yard run for a touchdown. With the loss, the Lions went into their bye week at 1-3.

Question: Were there more field goals or touchdowns during the game?

Input: Coming off a last-second road win over the Eagles, the Bears went home for Week 8, donned their alternate uniforms, and played an NFC North rematch with the Detroit Lions. After a scoreless first quarter, Chicago trailed as Lions kicker Jason Hanson got a 26-yard field goal, while RB Kevin Jones got a 4-yard TD run. Afterwards, Hanson increased Detroit's lead with a 52-yard field goal. In the third quarter, the Bears got on the board with QB Brian Griese completing a 20-yard TD pass to rookie TE Greg Olsen for the only score of the period. The Lions sealed Chicago's doom as Hanson nailed a 20-yard field goal, while Detroit's defense held its ground and got the season-sweep. With the loss, the Bears entered their bye week at 3-5. Q2 - DET - 14:56 - Jason Hanson 26-yard FG (DET 3-0) Q2 - DET - 1:53 - Kevin Jones 4-yard TD run (Hanson kick) (DET 10-0) Q2 - DET - 0:05 - Jason Hanson 52-yard FG (DET 13-0) Q3 - CHI - 5:26 - 20-yard TD pass from Brian Griese to Greg Olsen (Robbie Gould kick) (DET 13-7) Q4 - DET - 14:42 - Jason Hanson 20-yard FG (DET 16-7)

Question: How many field goals did the Lions make?

Input: Economic; The importance of trade and economic interests to the participants is often under estimated; contemporaries viewed Dutch and English support for the Habsburg cause as primarily driven by a desire for access to the Spanish American markets. Modern economics generally assumes a constantly growing market whereas the then dominant theory of Mercantilism viewed it as static. As a result, increasing your share of trade implied taking it from someone else, with the government's role being to restrict foreign competition. Trade was often used as a policy weapon; between 1690-1704, English import duties increased by 400%, while the 1651-1663 Navigation Acts were a major factor in the Anglo-Dutch Wars. On 6 September 1700, France banned the import of English manufactured goods like cloth and imposed prohibitive duties on a wide range of others. Military; the armies engaged in the Nine Years War often exceeded 100,000 men and proved too large for the pre-industrial economies of its participants. Those of 1701-1714 averaged around 35,000 - 50,000 but a dependence on water-borne transport accentuated the importance of rivers like the Rhine in Germany or the Adda in Northern Italy. Reliance on the local countryside for resupply limited operations in poor areas like Northern Spain; these factors confined campaigns to the same general areas.

Question: What happened first: the Navigation Acts or France banning the import of English manufactured goods?

Input: As of the United States Census, 2000, there were 68,747 people, 28,169 households, and 17,746 families residing in the city. The population density was . There were 29,499 housing units at an average density of . The racial makeup of the city was 79.2% White (U.S. Census), 14.5% African American (U.S. Census), 1.1% Asian (U.S. Census), 1.9% from Race (United States Census), and 2.0% from two or more races. Hispanic (U.S. Census) or Latino (U.S. Census) people of any race were 3.2% of the population.

Question:
How many in percent from the census weren't from two or more races?