Problem: Here is a premise:
Even four decades later, Bradley's appeal as a presidential candidate-contrary to some of his own campaign slogans-is not that he was ever the epitome of effortless cerebral and athletic superiority but that he has made the most of his talents.

Here is a hypothesis:
Bradley's campaign only focused on his athletic and cerebral prowess.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: The 2000 census showed Illinois with about 35,000 fewer people who are eligible for LSC services.

Sentence 2: A census showed LSC clients skyrocketing.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
we don't get channel two my our cable doesn't i wish we got that one it was it well we don't get channel two

Does it follow that "We could pay a little more to get channel two."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If oh of E-Systems okay, can we say that "Oh, belonging to E-Systems, okay."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"so i mean it it's like where does this all stop"
Hypothesis: Where does this all stop and reverse itself?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Dent was operating a royal charter for the British North Borneo Company a charter similar to that of the EIC.

Sentence 2: Dent independently founded the Dutch North Borneo Company, operating under a different charter to that of the EIC.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no