Question: Sentence A: When Howard Ceter peered through the dusty air of Tutankhamun's tomb in 1922 and, in his own words, wonderful things met his eyes, he confirmed the immeasurable wealth of the Pharaohs, and when the backer of the dig, Lord Carnarvon, died suddenly only a few months later, vox populi blamed it on the curse of the Pharaohs mummy and Hollywood was quick to feed our fantasies.

Sentence B: Ceter explored Tutankhamun's tomb.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: For example, it formats printouts for two or three columns a page, thus saving even more paper.
It only formats printouts for one column a page.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
FIXED VALUE SECURITIES - Securities that have a known maturity or redemption value at the time of issue.

Here is a hypothesis:
Fixed value securities have 7% interest.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: here kid this is this is all you're getting

Sentence 2: I'm not giving you anything.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
On the east coast, try Puri, south of Calcutta, or Pondicherry.

Does it follow that "Puri is not so well known."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "uh there's really a lot isn't there i mean there really is", can we conclude that "There really is a lot. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes