Teacher: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
Comment: Damn! Another cloudy day, and it's all Obama's doing!
Solution: Obscene
Reason: This is obscenity because it hints on sexual content that is offensive to the public sense of decency.

Now, solve this instance: Comment: Apparently feminist "theologians" or commentators know much more about the mind of God than did Jesus Himself.
It seems a silly exercise to me to change the lyrics to match one's ill-conceived concept of a gendered God counter to all Scriptural and Doctrinal references to Him as Father, King, etc. despite the fact that the Church has always understood that Father is not a gendered identity but a relationship. It's an exercise in idolatry.
I will say that WRT "Holy God We Praise Thy Name" that goddess fits the measure better than "Go-od", but in the second verse you are still left with the problem of making a two syllable word stretch for three notes; "Fa-ah-ther" and the proposed "Mo-uh-ther".
Student:
Non-obscene