Premise:
"The economics are easy enough to understand, lacking major stars, these movies are inexpensive to make and draw the ideal teens who are capable of seeing Titanic 17 times."
Hypothesis: These movies are economically advantageous, drawing enough ideal teens to them even without having major stars.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: and i guess there are some people out there like that um you know i always thought maybe you know if he took more of an interest and you know what i was doing and maybe we could have communicated better If this premise is true, does that tell us:"I thought that, if we had spent time doing what I was doing with me, then we would have communicated better."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Christians, Taoists, and Buddhists may practice as long as they support the state.", can we conclude that "Who believes in some religion can practice if they support the state, said the government."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: "Anyway he'll give Oro stiffer competition than he's had in the last two races.

Sentence B: Oro is a horse that does not compete.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Very little is being done practically to solve it.
People are talking, but there are no good solutions yet.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Traditional audience participation in events such as beauty contests usually plays a part in the entertainment.

Here is a hypothesis:
Entertainment commonly entails activities that include spectators.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes