Transwestern Pipeline Company Transwestern has run into some problems with the air permit conditions for the Redrock Expansion. For the state permits, the ADEQ wants to abitrarily set a 10% safety factor to the emissions levels which approach PSD. This means that they have written into the draft permit a reduction in the allowable hours of operation for the generator from 8760 to 7800. This generator is the facility's prime source of power and therefore, needs to be operated for 8760 hours. Transwestern will challenge the agency's authority to apply a 10%safety factor. For the Indain lands permits, the EPA has written a permit condition of 25 ppmvd for NOx and CO under all operating conditions. Manufacturerers guarantees only apply at 25 ppmvd at loads above 65% and at 0F. It appears that Transwestern may have convenienced the EPA to back away from permit limits in ppmvd and include as permit conditons lb/hr and ton/yr emissions limits that Transwestern originally placed into its applications. Northern Natural Gas Company A standard exemption for the NNG Martin Co. No. 1 facility was submitted to the TNRCC. Preliminary maintenance activities and newly published AP-42 emissions factors have shown that the Martin Co. 1 facility may be a Title V facility. Under the old AP-42 factors, the units at the facility were not greater than 100 ton/year sources. Continued investigation is being conducted to determine emissions levels from the units at the facility. EOTT A request and supporting documentation was submitted to the TNRCC to remove the EOTT Crane facility from the Title V operating permit program. New data on the crude oil received into the facility shows the emissions limits for VOCs to be less than the Title V regulated limit. General Preparations are being finalized for the environmental roundtable to be held next week in Albuquerque.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Weekly Envoironmental Activity Report
Cynthia: As you know, the Bankruptcy Code revisions never made it through the recent Congress. I understand they bogged down in the final days over issues which were essentially irrelevant to us in ECT. I'm not sure you are aware of the importance to our trading business of certain of the other proposed revisions. We anticipate that the revisions will be reintroduced in the next Congress and are beginning to think about ways that we can influence the outcome this time around. Are you the right person in your shop for us to talk to about this? If you could let me know, I'd appreciate it. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Bankruptcy Code revisions
The referenced counterparty is on the list below for online approval to trade us gas financial products. This counterparty came through before on the 1/20/00 list and we did not approve them for financial trading because of a "payment dispute". Is anyone out there aware of the payment dispute with this counterparty, and has it been resolved? Can we open this counterparty up to trade financial? They are an ESP...
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: PLEASE READ: Sonoco Products Company
Attached is the referenced counterparty approval list. Per earlier emails, no U.S. counterparty should be approved for european power until we hear otherwise. Also, per my email yesterday, CMS Marketing, Services & Trading Company was already approved yesterday to do basis financial. All other prior approvals for that counterparty should stay the same.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Counterparty List for 12/28/99