Q: On June 26, 2000, two scientists, called Francis Collins and Craig Venter, told the world that they could read the whole "map" of the human body: DNA. DNA is something that everybody has, and it tells the body what to do. DNA is the reason that we look like our mother and father, because we get some of their DNA to make our own. People have been trying to understand the human body for a long time. In 1860, Gregor Mendel discovered a special reason why we look the same as other people in our family. It is because of small things named "genes" in our body. In 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick made another discovery and found out that those small parts are real messages written in the DNA with a special language. In 1961, Marshall Nirenberg and Johann Matthaci found a message in DNA showing how DNA tells the cell to build its parts. Scientists have now found all the words in the DNA map, but we still do not understand what they all do. By understanding what just one "word" means, we can help save more people from several illnesses. Most people hope that this will help make better medicine and help sick people. Other people worry that when people begin to know more words and find out lots of other information, we might use it in a wrong way, just to make people more attractive, or stop sick people from getting jobs. Man would have to meet a lot of trouble if DNA technic wasn't limited in use.

1. Two
2. Scientists
3. Francis Collins and Craig Venter
4. DNA
5. It tells the body what to do
6. Gregor Mende

Numbered questions:
1. how many people said they could read peoples outline?
2. what were their jobs?
3. what were their names?
4. why do we look like our parents?
5. what else does it do?
6. who fount out about little thing in humans?

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. The unemployment rate is a measure of the prevalence of unemployment and it is calculated as a percentage by dividing the number of unemployed individuals by all individuals currently in the labor force. During periods of recession, an economy usually experiences a relatively high unemployment rate. According to International Labour Organization report, more than 200 million people globally or 6% of the world's workforce were without a job in 2012.

There remains considerable theoretical debate regarding the causes, consequences and solutions for unemployment. Classical economics, new classical economics, and the Austrian School of economics argue that market mechanisms are reliable means of resolving unemployment. These theories argue against interventions imposed on the labor market from the outside such, as unionization, bureaucratic work rules, minimum wage laws, taxes, and other regulations that they claim discourage the hiring of workers.

Keynesian economics emphasizes the cyclical nature of unemployment and recommends government interventions in the economy that it claims will reduce unemployment during recessions. This theory focuses on recurrent shocks that suddenly reduce aggregate demand for goods and services and thus reduce demand for workers. Keynesian models recommend government interventions designed to increase demand for workers; these can include financial stimuli, publicly funded job creation, and expansionist monetary policies. Its namesake economist John Maynard Keynes, believed that the root cause of unemployment is the desire of investors to receive more money rather than produce more products, which is not possible without public bodies producing new money. 1. What is being calculated?
2. How so?
3. Is it generally low during a bad economic period?
4. How many folks didn't have jobs in 2012?
5. What percent is that?
6. Says who?
7. What uses focus on the cycle of folks not working?
8. Does that say governments should help?
9. How so?
10. Any other ways?
11. Like what?
12. Who is this style of thinking named after?
13. What does he do?
14. What did the think caused the issue?
15. Did he think this could be done?
16. Do experts agree on what makes folks jobless?
17. How many types of thought think markets fix it?
18. And they are?
19. Do they agree with external influence trying to help?
20. Why not?
numbered_answers: 1. The unemployment rate
2. by dividing the number of unemployed individuals by all individuals currently in the labor force
3. no
4. more than 200 million people globally
5. Six
6. the International Labour Organization
7. Keynesian economics
8. yes
9. financial stimuli
10. yes
11. publicly funded job creation, and expansionist monetary policies
12. John Maynard Keynes
13. he's an economist
14. the desire of investors to receive more money rather than produce more products
15. no
16. no
17. three
18. Classical economics, new classical economics, and the Austrian School of economics
19. no
20. it will discourage the hiring of workers

CHAPTER XXXV.

Were uneasiness of conscience measured by extent of crime, human history had been different, and one should look to see the contrivers of greedy wars and the mighty marauders of the money-market in one troop of self-lacerating penitents with the meaner robber and cut-purse and the murderer that doth his butchery in small with his own hand. No doubt wickedness hath its rewards to distribute; but who so wins in this devil's game must needs be baser, more cruel, more brutal than the order of this planet will allow for the multitude born of woman, the most of these carrying a form of conscience--a fear which is the shadow of justice, a pity which is the shadow of love--that hindereth from the prize of serene wickedness, itself difficult of maintenance in our composite flesh.

On the twenty-ninth of December Deronda knew that the Grandcourts had arrived at the Abbey, but he had had no glimpse of them before he went to dress for dinner. There had been a splendid fall of snow, allowing the party of children the rare pleasures of snow-balling and snow-building, and in the Christmas holidays the Mallinger girls were content with no amusement unless it were joined in and managed by "cousin," as they had always called Deronda. After that outdoor exertion he had been playing billiards, and thus the hours had passed without his dwelling at all on the prospect of meeting Gwendolen at dinner. Nevertheless that prospect was interesting to him; and when, a little tired and heated with working at amusement, he went to his room before the half-hour bell had rung, he began to think of it with some speculation on the sort of influence her marriage with Grandcourt would have on her, and on the probability that there would be some discernible shades of change in her manner since he saw her at Diplow, just as there had been since his first vision of her at Leubronn. What are the answers to this following set of questions: 1. What date did someone know something?
2. who arrived?
Answer:
1. the twenty-ninth of December
2. the Grandcourts