Q: Given the sentence "A blond woman wearing glasses is playing tennis." can we conclude that "The woman is wearing nike tennis shoes."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A woman in blue shorts and white shirt holds a tennis racket on a blue tennis court is not necessarily wearing Nike tennis shoes.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "A hockey player tries to block the puck from the goal." can we conclude that "The hockey player will stop the puck."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A hockey player tries to block the puck from the goal does not imply that he will stop the puck.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A mountain biker with number 060 on the bike covered in mud from riding downhill on a muddy track."
Hypothesis: "A woman is riding her bike on the sidewalk."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: The woman riding her bike on a sidewalk contradicts the biker in first sentence riding downhill.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "Several young people walking casually around."
Hypothesis: "Walking is dumb."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A:
Several young people walking casually around does not make them dumb.
The answer is no.