In this task, you are given product reviews about dvds. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive(the reviewer is satisfied) or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative(the reviewer is not satisfied).

Input: Consider Input: What Were They Thinking? . Man, I don't know what the other reviewers of this movie were smoking, but it should be illegal! This is, first off, a terrible DVD: 4:3 (full screen) format, with a dark, muddy picture. Worse, the plot is typical, predictable, and poorly written. Other than looking for glimpses of Teri Hatcher's body, sitting through this fiasco is a total bore. I was also surprised at how bad Teri's acting was in this movie, since I've seen her do much better in things she was in previous to this. That is probably the fault of the director, Erik Anjou, a third-rate director (at best!) who has done a total of two movies and one documentary. Gee, I wonder why he isn't in more demand (NOT!)! I can enjoy "B" movies, and bad movies, but this one is just so totally non-involving that it is not even good enough to laugh at. I can't imagine that this mess was released on DVD for any reason other than to cash in on Teri Hatcher's current popularity, and to suck the cash out of people who are anxious to see a younger (29 year-old) Teri Hatcher nude. Rent this, if you must, but, wow, there is no reason anyone should want to buy a movie this bad

Output: NEG

Input: Consider Input: Extreme something . Some folks need only a paper-thin plot to string together a bunch of action sequences, without character or theme or language or logic getting in the way. If that's you, this may be your movie. Xtreme sports, xtreme ops. Get it? If that doesn't strike you as xtremely clever, you may find this movie painful to watch. I'm thinking of telling The Agony Booth about it. The humor doesn't work, to the extent that I think I want a laugh track after all. Or a drummer doing rim shots. Ba-DUM-bum! Characters are distinguishable by such things as fake national accent and stereotyped mannerisms, hair style and/or color, or shouting all his dialogue. I didn't watch it all. I didn't even watch enough to tell you what it's about. Amazon or Imdb can tell you what it's about. Just something else we found in the flat. Someone's losing credibility as a selector of DVDs.

Output: NEG

Input: Consider Input: Stunning visuals, Dismal premise and narration. . Visuals are stunning, editing is superb - so if you need a visual guide to the Bible, this is pretty good. Unfortunately, that is where the good ends. Bruce Feiler sets out on a quest to visit all the biblical landmarks of its first five books, but the trip has an inherent weakness - Mr. Feiler is a skeptic. He is taking a journey of faith but rationalizes each and every step he takes. For example, ascending the Mt. Ararat, where the Bible says the Ark of Noah rested; he wonders where all the waters would have come from in the first place. He wonders - melting ice-caps? In other words, Bruce Feiler is looking for a rational explanation for the Great Flood! If Bruce Feiler believes that there was a garden of Eden as the Bible says (his very first stop), then he must also believe that God made the heavens and the earth, as the Bible says! If HE can create the Heavens and the Earth by the Word of HIS mouth, HE can also perform miracles. You cannot pick and choose what you believe based on your so-called rationality - either the Bible is true in its entirety, or it is not. If it is not true, then it does not need Bruce Feiler's help to prop up its so-called "stories". This aspect of Bruce Feiler journey is oft repeated - and very perplexing. Why set out on such a journey if you do not believe your Guidebook? More examples? Bruce Feiler suggest that since the Sinai wilderness could not support the number of people the Bible says crossed over from Egypt, therefore the numbers must be wrong. How about the Manna being nothing but the gum of some wilderness tree in Sinai? I could go on....but you get the point. After a while, this becomes very annoying. If you are a believer, this is not for you. I would not recommend it for my children.
Output: NEG