In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: There was a term floating around some time ago: I think it was "cosmetic abortions"? The rich and famous who could see pregnancy as simply "utilitarian" and without a qualm - or maybe a twitch at being discovered by their husband or "sugar daddy" - would buy the "riddance".
A rich psychopathic narcissist who self-proclaims his absolute license and opportunity to grope women's genitals likely has; has done so for more; and likely has "cosmetically" paid for the "riddance". (Reminds me of Tom Wolfe's "Vanity of the Gods"). Even if he hasn't, he seems like someone who would. Not someone I would want to be around. St Paul was only a tax-collector and "persecutor" when his lightning hit. A conversion for Trump would require a strike more akin to that which "enlivened" Frankenstein's beast.
Sexual-explicit