You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you are given the abstract of a research paper. Your task is to generate a summary of this abstract. Your summary should not be very short, but it's better if it's not more than 30 words.

This paper revisits the problem of sequence modeling using convolutional
architectures. Although both convolutional and recurrent architectures have a
long history in sequence prediction, the current "default" mindset in much of
the deep learning community is that generic sequence modeling is best handled
using recurrent networks. The goal of this paper is to question this assumption .
Specifically, we consider a simple generic temporal convolution network (TCN ),
which adopts features from modern ConvNet architectures such as a dilations and
residual connections. We show that on a variety of sequence modeling tasks ,
including many frequently used as benchmarks for evaluating recurrent networks ,
the TCN outperforms baseline RNN methods (LSTMs, GRUs, and vanilla RNNs) and
sometimes even highly specialized approaches. We further show that the
potential "infinite memory" advantage that RNNs have over TCNs is largely
absent in practice: TCNs indeed exhibit longer effective history sizes than their
recurrent counterparts. As a whole, we argue that it may be time to (re)consider
ConvNets as the default "go to" architecture for sequence modeling.
Output:
We argue that convolutional networks should be considered the default starting point for sequence modeling tasks.