In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Example Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Federal Judiciary Ethics Reform Act
of 2006''.

SEC. 2. JUDICIAL EDUCATION FUND.

(a) Establishment.--Chapter 42 of title 28, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following:
''Sec. 630. Judicial Education Fund
''(a) In this section, the term--
''(1) 'institution of higher education' has the meaning
given under section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965
(20 U.S.C. 1001(a));
''(2) 'private judicial seminar'--
''(A) means a seminar, symposia, panel discussion,
course, or a similar event that provides continuing
legal education to judges; and
''(B) does not include--
''(i) seminars that last 1 day or less and
are conducted by, and on the campus of, an
institute of higher education;
''(ii) seminars that last 1 day or less and
are conducted by national bar associations or
State or local bar associations for the benefit
of the bar association membership; or
''(iii) seminars of any length conducted
by, and on the campus of an institute of higher
education or by national bar associations or
State or local bar associations, where a judge
is a presenter and at which judges constitute
less than 25 percent of the participants;
''(3) 'national bar association' means a national
organization that is open to general membership to all members
of the bar; and
''(4) 'State or local bar association' means a State or
local organization that is open to general membership to all
members of the bar in the specified geographic region.
''(b) There is established within the United States Treasury a fund
to be known as the 'Judicial Education Fund' (in this section referred
to as the 'Fund').
''(c) Amounts in the Fund may be made available for the payment of
necessary expenses, including reasonable expenditures for
transportation, food, lodging, private judicial seminar fees and
materials, incurred by a judge or justice in attending a private
judicial seminar approved by the Board of the Federal Judicial Center.
Necessary expenses shall not include expenditures for recreational
activities or entertainment other than that provided to all attendees
as an integral part of the private judicial seminar. Any payment from
the Fund shall be approved by the Board.
''(d) The Board may approve a private judicial seminar after
submission of information by the sponsor of that private judicial
seminar that includes--
''(1) the content of the private judicial seminar
(including a list of presenters, topics, and course materials);
and
''(2) the litigation activities of the sponsor and the
presenters at the private judicial seminar (including the
litigation activities of the employer of each presenter) on the
topic related to those addressed at the private judicial
seminar.
''(e) If the Board approves a private judicial seminar, the Board
shall make the information submitted under subsection (d) relating to
the private judicial seminar available to judges and the public by
posting the information on the Internet.
''(f) The Judicial Conference shall promulgate guidelines to ensure
that the Board only approves private judicial seminars that are
conducted in a manner so as to maintain the public's confidence in an
unbiased and fair-minded judiciary.
''(g) There are authorized to be appropriated for deposit in the
Fund $2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006, 2007, and 2008, to
remain available until expended.''.
(b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for
chapter 42 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the
end the following:

''630. Judicial Education Fund.''.

SEC. 3. PRIVATE JUDICIAL SEMINAR GIFTS PROHIBITED.

(a) Definitions.--In this section, the term--
(1) ''institution of higher education'' has the meaning
given under section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965
(20 U.S.C. 1001(a));
(2) ''private judicial seminar''--
(A) means a seminar, symposia, panel discussion,
course, or a similar event that provides continuing
legal education to judges; and
(B) does not include--
(i) seminars that last 1 day or less and
are conducted by, and on the campus of, an
institute of higher education;
(ii) seminars that last 1 day or less and
are conducted by national bar associations or
State or local bar associations for the benefit
of the bar association membership; or
(iii) seminars of any length conducted by,
and on the campus of an institute of higher
education or by national bar associations or
State or local bar associations, where a judge
is a presenter and at which judges constitute
less than 25 percent of the participants;
(3) ''national bar association'' means a national
organization that is open to general membership to all members
of the bar; and
(4) ''State or local bar association'' means a State or
local organization that is open to general membership to all
members of the bar in the specified geographic region.
(b) In General.--Not later than 240 days after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Judicial Conference of the United States
shall promulgate regulations to apply section 7353(a) of title 5,
United States Code, to prohibit the solicitation or acceptance of
anything of value in connection with a private judicial seminar.
(c) Exception.--The prohibition under the regulations promulgated
under subsection (b) shall not apply if--
(1) the judge participates in a private judicial seminar as
a speaker, panel participant, or otherwise presents
information;
(2) Federal judges are not the primary audience at the
private judicial seminar; and
(3) the thing of value accepted is--
(A) reimbursement from the private judicial seminar
sponsor of reasonable transportation, food, or lodging
expenses on any day on which the judge speaks,
participates, or presents information, as applicable;
(B) attendance at the private judicial seminar on
any day on which the judge speaks, participates, or
presents information, as applicable; or
(C) anything excluded from the definition of a gift
under regulations of the Judicial Conference of the
United States under sections 7351 and 7353 of title 5,
United States Code, as in effect on the date of
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 4. RECUSAL LISTS.

Section 455 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding
at the end the following:
''(g)(1) Each justice, judge, and magistrate of the United States
shall maintain a list of all financial interests that would require
disqualification under subsection (b)(4).
''(2) Each list maintained under paragraph (1) shall be made
available to the public at the office of the clerk for the court at
which a justice, judge, or magistrate is assigned.''.
Example Output: Federal Judiciary Ethics Reform Act of 2006 - Amends the federal judicial code to: (1) establish within the Treasury a Judicial Education Fund for the payment of necessary expenses incurred by a judge or justice in attending a private judicial seminar approved by the Board of the Federal Judicial Center; and (2) require each justice, judge, and magistrate of the United States to maintain a list (to be made available to the public) of all financial interests that would require disqualification in any proceeding in which his or her impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

Directs the Judicial Conference of the United States to promulgate regulations to prohibit the solicitation or acceptance of anything in value in connection with a private judicial seminar, with specified exceptions.

Example Input: SECTION 1. RENEWAL COMMUNITY TAX INCENTIVES.

(a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 1400E of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
(1) by striking ''December 31, 2009'' in paragraphs (1)(A)
and (3) and inserting ''December 31, 2012''; and
(2) by striking ''January 1, 2010'' in paragraph (3) and
inserting ''January 1, 2013''.
(b) Zero-Percent Capital Gains Rate.--
(1) Acquisition date.--Paragraphs (2)(A)(i), (3)(A),
(4)(A)(i), and (4)(B)(i) of section 1400F(b) of such Code are
each amended by striking ''January 1, 2010'' and inserting
''January 1, 2013''.
(2) Limitation on period of gains.--Paragraph (2) of
section 1400F(c) of such Code is amended--
(A) by striking ''December 31, 2014'' and inserting
''December 31, 2017''; and
(B) by striking ''2014'' in the heading and
inserting ''2017''.
(3) Applicable rules.--Subsection (d) of section 1400F is
amended--
(A) by striking ''December 31, 2014'' the first
place it appears and inserting ''December 31, 2017'',
and
(B) by striking ''December 31, 2014'' the second
place it appears and inserting ''December 31, 2016''.
(c) Commercial Revitalization Deduction.--
(1) Extension.--
(A) In general.--Subsection (g) of section 1400I of
such Code is amended by striking ''December 31, 2009''
and inserting ''December 31, 2012''.
(B) Conforming amendment.--Subparagraph (A) of
section 1400I(d)(2) of such Code is amended by striking
''after 2001 and before 2010'' and inserting ''which
begins after 2001 and before the date referred to in
subsection (g)''.
(2) Carryforward of unallocated state commercial
revitalization expenditure ceiling.--
(A) In general.--Paragraph (1) of section 1400I(d)
of such Code is amended to read as follows:
''(1) In general.--The aggregate commercial revitalization
expenditure amount which a commercial revitalization agency may
allocate for any calendar year is the amount equal to the sum
of--
''(A) the amount of the State commercial
revitalization expenditure ceiling determined under
this paragraph for such calendar year for such agency
(determined without regard to subparagraph (B)), and
''(B) the aggregate of the unused State commercial
revitalization expenditure ceilings determined under
this paragraph for such agency for each of the 2
preceding calendar years.
For purposes of subparagraph (B), amounts of expenditure
ceiling shall be treated as allocated by an agency first from
unused amounts for the second preceding calendar year, then
from unused amounts for the 1st preceding calendar year, and
then from amounts from the current year State allocation.''.
(B) Effective date.--The amendment made by this
subsection shall apply to calendar years beginning
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(d) Increased Expensing Under Section 179.--Subparagraph (A) of
section 1400J(b)(1) of such Code is amended by striking ''January 1,
2010'' and inserting ''January 1, 2013''.
(e) Treatment of Certain Termination Dates Specified in
Nominations.--In the case of a designation of a renewal community the
nomination for which included a termination date which is
contemporaneous with the date specified in subparagraph (A) of section
1400E(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as in effect before
the enactment of this Act), subparagraph (B) of such section shall not
apply with respect to such designation unless, after the date of the
enactment of this section, the entity which made such nomination
reconfirms such termination date, or amends the nomination to provide
for a new termination date, in such manner as the Secretary of the
Treasury (or the Secretary's designee) may provide.
(f) Effective Dates.--
(1) In general.--Except as otherwise provided in this
subsection, the amendments made by this section shall apply to
periods after December 31, 2009.
(2) Acquisitions.--The amendments made by subsections
(b)(1) and (d) shall apply to acquisitions after December 31,
2009.
(3) Commercial revitalization deduction.--
(A) In general.--The amendment made by subsection
(c)(1) shall apply to buildings placed in service after
December 31, 2009.
(B) Conforming amendment.--The amendment made by
subsection (c)(2) shall apply to calendar years
beginning after December 31, 2009.
Example Output: Amends the Internal Revenue Code to extend through December 31, 2012, the designation period of areas as renewal communities and tax incentives for investment in such areas, including: (1) the exclusion from gross income for income tax purposes of gain from the sale or exchange of assets (stock or business property) in such areas, (2) the tax deduction for commercial revitalization expenditures in such areas, and (3) an increased expensing allowance for the acquisition of business and investment assets in such areas.

Example Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''American Missile Protection Act of
1998''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The threat of weapons of mass destruction delivered by
long-range ballistic missiles is among the most serious
security issues facing the United States.
(A) In a 1994 Executive Order, President Clinton
certified, that ''I ... find that the proliferation of
nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons ('weapons of
mass destruction') and the means of delivering such
weapons, constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat
to the national security, foreign policy, and economy
of the United States, and hereby declare a national
emergency to deal with that threat.'' This state of
emergency was reaffirmed in 1995, 1996, and 1997.
(B) In 1994 the President stated, that ''there is
nothing more important to our security and the world's
stability than preventing the spread of nuclear weapons
and ballistic missiles''.
(C) Several countries hostile to the United States
have been particularly determined to acquire missiles
and weapons of mass destruction. President Clinton
observed in January of 1998, for example, that ''Saddam
Hussein has spent the better part of this decade, and
much of his nation's wealth, not on providing for the
Iraqi people, but on developing nuclear, chemical and
biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them''.
(D) In 1996, the Senate affirmed that, ''it is in
the supreme interest of the United States to defend
itself from the threat of limited ballistic missile
attack, whatever the source.''
(2) The long-range ballistic missile threat to the United
States is increasing.
(A) Several adversaries of the United States have
stated their intention to acquire intercontinental
ballistic missiles capable of attacking the United
States.
(i) Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi has
stated, ''If they know that you have a
deterrent force capable of hitting the United
States, they would not be able to hit you. If
we had possessed a deterrent--missiles that
could reach New York--we would have hit it at
the same moment. Consequently, we should build
this force so that they and others will no
longer think about an attack.''
(ii) Abu Abbas, the head of the Palestine
Liberation Front, has stated, ''I would love to
be able to reach the American shore, but this
is very difficult. Someday an Arab country will
have ballistic missiles. Someday an Arab
country will have a nuclear bomb. It is better
for the United States and for Israel to reach
peace with the Palestinians before that day.''
(iii) Saddam Hussein has stated, ''Our
missiles cannot reach Washington. If we could
reach Washington, we would strike if the need
arose.''
(iv) Iranian actions speak for themselves.
Iran's aggressive pursuit of medium-range
ballistic missiles capable of striking Central
Europe--aided by the continuing collaboration
of outside agents--demonstrates Tehran's intent
to acquire ballistic missiles of ever-
increasing range.
(B) Over 30 non-NATO countries possess ballistic
missiles, with at least 10 of those countries
developing over 20 new types of ballistic missiles.
(C) From the end of World War II until 1980,
ballistic missiles were used in one conflict. Since
1980, thousands of ballistic missiles have been fired
in at least six different conflicts.
(D) The clear trend among countries hostile to the
United States is toward having ballistic missiles of
greater range.
(i) North Korea first acquired 300-
kilometer range Scud Bs, then developed and
deployed 500-kilometer range Scud Cs, is
currently deploying the 1000-kilometer range
No-Dong, and is developing the 2000-kilometer
range Taepo-Dong 1 and 6000-kilometer range
Taepo-Dong 2, which would be capable of
striking Alaska and Hawaii.
(ii) Iran acquired 150-kilometer range CSS-
8s, progressed through the Scud B and Scud C,
and is developing the 1300-kilometer range
Shahab-3 and 2000-kilometer range Shahab-4,
which would allow Iran to strike Central
Europe.
(iii) Iraq, in a two-year crash program,
produced a new missile, the Al-Hussein, with
twice the range of its Scud Bs.
(iv) Experience gained from extending the
range of short- and medium-range ballistic
missiles facilitates the development of
intercontinental ballistic missiles.
(E) The technical information, hardware, and other
resources necessary to build ballistic missiles are
increasingly available and accessible worldwide.
(i) Due to advances in information
technology, a vast amount of technical
information relating to ballistic missile
design, much of it formerly classified, has
become widely available and is increasingly
accessible through the Internet and other
distribution avenues.
(ii) Components, tools, and materials to
support ballistic missile development are
increasingly available in the commercial
aerospace industry.
(iii) Increasing demand for satellite-based
telecommunications is adding to the demand for
commercial Space Launch Vehicles, which employ
technology that is essentially identical to
that of intercontinental ballistic missiles. As
this increasing demand is met, the technology
and expertise associated with space launch
vehicles also proliferate.
(F) Russia and China have provided significant
technical assistance to rogue nation ballistic missile
programs, accelerating the pace of those efforts. In
June of 1997, the Director of Central Intelligence,
reporting to Congress on weapons of mass destruction-
related equipment, materials, and technology, stated
that ''China and Russia continued to be the primary
suppliers, and are key to any future efforts to stem
the flow of dual-use goods and modern weapons to
countries of concern.''
(G) Russia and China continue to engage in missile
proliferation.
(i) Despite numerous Russian assurances not
to assist Iran with its ballistic missile
program, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of
State for Nonproliferation testified to the
Senate, that ''the problem is this: there is a
disconnect between those reassurances, which we
welcome, and what we believe is actually
occurring.''
(ii) Regarding China's actions to
demonstrate the sincerity of its commitment to
nonproliferation, the Director of Central
Intelligence testified to the Senate on January
28, 1998, that, ''the jury is still out on
whether the recent changes are broad enough in
scope and whether they will hold over the
longer term. As such, Chinese activities in
this area will require continued close
watching.''
(H) The inability of the United States to defend
itself against weapons of mass destruction delivered by
long-range ballistic missile provides additional
incentive for hostile nations to develop long-range
ballistic missiles with which to threaten the United
States. Missiles are widely viewed as valuable tools
for deterring and coercing a vulnerable United States.
(3) The ability of the United States to anticipate future
ballistic missile threats is questionable.
(A) The Intelligence Community has failed to
anticipate many past technical innovations (for
example, Iraq's extended-range Al-Hussein missiles and
its development of a space launch vehicle) and outside
assistance enables rogue states to surmount traditional
technological obstacles to obtaining or developing
ballistic missiles of increasing range.
(B) In June of 1997, the Director of Central
Intelligence reported to Congress that ''many Third
World countries--with Iran being the most prominent
example--are responding to Western counter-
proliferation efforts by relying more on legitimate
commercial firms as procurement fronts and by
developing more convoluted procurement networks.''
(C) In June of 1997, the Director of Central
Intelligence stated to Congress that ''gaps and
uncertainties preclude a good projection of exactly
when 'rest of the world' countries will deploy ICBMs.''
(D) In 1997, the Director of Central Intelligence
testified that Iran would have a medium-range missile
by 2007. One year later the Director stated, ''since I
testified, Iran's success in getting technology and
materials from Russian companies, combined with recent
indigenous Iranian advances, means that it could have a
medium-range missile much sooner than I assessed last
year.'' Department of State officials have testified
that Iran could be prepared to deploy such a missile as
early as late 1998, nine years earlier than had been
predicted one year before by the Director of Central
Intelligence.
(4) The failure to prepare adequately for long-range
ballistic missile threats could have severe national security
and foreign policy consequences for the United States.
(A) An attack on the United States by a ballistic
missile equipped with a weapon of mass destruction
could inflict catastrophic death or injury to citizens
of the United States and severe damage to their
property.
(B) A rogue state's ability to threaten the United
States with an intercontinental ballistic missile may
constrain the United States' options in dealing with
regional threats to its interests, deter the United
States from taking appropriate action, or prompt allies
to question United States security guarantees, thereby
weakening alliances of the United States and the United
States' world leadership position.
(5) The United States must be prepared for rogue nations
acquiring long-range ballistic missiles armed with weapons of
mass destruction.
(A) In its resolution of ratification for the START
II Treaty, the United States Senate declared that
''because deterrence may be inadequate to protect the
United States against long-range ballistic missile
threats, missile defenses are a necessary part of new
deterrent strategies.''
(B) In September of 1994, Secretary of Defense
Perry stated that in the post-Cold War era, ''we now
have opportunity to create a new relationship based not
on MAD, not on Mutual Assured Destruction, but rather
on another acronym, MAS, or Mutual Assured Safety.''
(C) On February 12, 1997, the Under Secretary of
Defense for Policy testified to the Senate that ''I and
the administration are quite willing to acknowledge
that if we saw a rogue state, a potential proliferant,
beginning to develop a long-range ICBM capable of
reaching the United States, we would have to give very,
very serious attention to deploying a limited national
missile defense.''
(6) The United States has no defense deployed against
weapons of mass destruction delivered by long-range ballistic
missiles and no policy to deploy such a national missile
defense system.

SEC. 3. NATIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE POLICY.

It is the policy of the United States to deploy as soon as is
technologically possible an effective National Missile Defense system
capable of defending the territory of the United States against limited
ballistic missile attack (whether accidental, unauthorized, or
deliberate).
Example Output:
American Missile Protection Act of 1998 - States as U.S. policy to deploy as soon as technologically possible an effective National Missile Defense system capable of defending U.S. territory against limited ballistic missile attack (whether accidental, unauthorized, or deliberate).