input question: Since GAO has a legal right of access to the requested documents and since full access was not provided within 20 days following our July 18 letter pursuant to 31 U.S.C. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"GAO has too many legal rights."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "They would not be shaken because twelve stupid men had happened to make a mistake! ", can we conclude that "They wouldn't be shaken by a bad jury."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: The ruling, which is expected in June, will turn on the court's interpretation of the White House counsel's mandate . No legal precedent presages the decision.

Sentence B: It is expected that the ruling will be delivered in June.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Hospital admissions-Respiratory and Cardiovascular
No one is admitted to the hospital.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
that the reason why she didn't like it was that she felt that the place wasn't cleaned well um they had um younger kids you know wiping the tables down and they weren't very

Here is a hypothesis:
She loved the place because it was cleaned thoroughly.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
He ran for Congress from Massachusetts and, revitalized, served for 18 years--notably helping to overturn the shameful gag rule that forbade the reading of anti-slavery petitions on the floor of the House.

Does it follow that "During his 18 years of service, he worked on gag rules enacted on the floor of the House."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes