Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: Though it was never fully explained (and likely left on the cuttingroom floor), I thought the obvious answer is that he was taking out frustration while getting sedated with wine. It was my impression, though not explicitly stated in the movie, that Murray's character was a victim of physical abuse. As such, it would make sense that he would need to vent on some other physical object, namely the tree. <sep> Q: Why does Bill Murray's character try to chop down the tree? A: It was my impression, though not explicitly stated in the movie, that Murray's character was a victim of physical abuse. As such, it would make <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did he hope the tree would fall?
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: There's something else to add to the other answers : Vision can't exist without the mind stone. So to bring him back, you'll need to bring him back with the mind stone on his head, which can't be done if the mind stone is on the gauntlet (as far as we know, even having the 6 stones can't make you create a new stone). So even if resurecting someone was possible, Vision is one of the only creatures in the universe that actually could never be brought back by the stones. <sep> Q: Thanos killed Vision in Infinity War to get the Mind Stone. During end game, hulk does "the snap" does this mean that the chracter was brought back? A: Vision can't exist without the mind stone. So to bring him back, you'll need to bring him back with the mind stone on his head Q: How is this possible? A: as far as we know, even having the 6 stones can't make you create a new stone Q: So Vision wont be able to be brought back to life? A: Vision is one of the only creatures in the universe that actually could never be brought back by the stones <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else you can tell me?
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so. He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot. It's a judgment call by the Academy, but his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct. <sep> Q: Why was Dev Patel nominated for Supporting Actor rather than Best Actor? A: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so Q: So he wasn't eligible? A: It's a judgment call by the Academy Q: Would he be better suited for a "Supporting Role"? A: his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is he the main character or the protagonist for the movie Lion?
[EX A]:
Yes