Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Yep, good thing that Shell could not move forward with production. The associated support jobs would only bring/keep the wrong type of people around here. I think that it is just safer to work for the State of Alaska.
[A]: Yes

[Q]: Alex,
How many of your remarks are true? Right from Pebbles own website they are only claiming up to 1000 jobs that will last from 20 to 25 years. Then what? Look at Detroit or Pittsburgh after their economy's turned down. And they had more than one industry to fall back on. It happens everywhere, when the industry dries up and the company's leave, it is left up to the local people and tax payers to clean up the mess left behind. Why risk one of the greatest unspoiled places on Earth so a very few people can make a little more money?
[A]: No

[Q]: Interesting article. Somewhere in this story is "some truth." The fed prosecutor if this record is accurate is taking this matter entirely to personal. Perhaps as what occurred in Steven's ordeal. And if the actions of the defendant where really that "murky and grey" why hasn't he passed away as is what often happens to the "stooge" when no longer needed and his permanent silence assured? (Hey ADN I have two computers and sense this "new" site came on line booting it up, scrolling it and sometimes writing in is not working very well. Others at the office are having the same problems).
[A]:
No