In this task, you're given a pair of sentences, sentence 1 and sentence 2. Your job is to determine if the two sentences clearly agree/disagree with each other, or if this can't be determined. Indicate your answer as yes or no respectively.

Sentence 1: okay well good luck to the Rangers this season see if they can pull one out Sentence 2: Good luck to the Rangers this season; let's see if they win.
yes

Sentence 1: And while it would be a mistake to say that the stock could have opened at that highest price, it's safe to say that if Robertson Stephens had done a better job of gauging demand, millions of dollars that went into traders' pockets would have gone into Pixar's vaults instead. Sentence 2: Many people lost their jobs due to Robertson Stephens failure to properly calculate demand.
no

Sentence 1: It suggests, in particular, that what might seem to a naive commentator like a natural conclusion--if productivity growth in the steel industry reduces the number of jobs for steelworkers, then productivity growth in the economy as a whole reduces employment in the economy as a whole--may well involve a crucial fallacy of composition. Sentence 2: This is an accurate analogy.
no