In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
Q: Comment: The Pope, according to the German bishops, the Argentinian bishops, the Cardinal Vicar of Rome, Cardinals Cupich and Farrell and bishop McElroy to name a few, thinks that there are circumstances when divorced and remaried couples living 'more uxorio' may receive Holy Communion. That is how they interpret Amoris Laetitia and the Pope hasn't denied that interpretation.
The four Cardinals and their supporters do not believe that this is permissible under any circumstances and that has been the position of Cardinal Muller even up to the present although he seems less firm about it now. The Pope won't deny or affirm what position he holds so how can it be said that Muller is supporting him?
Incidentally calling someone a liar is hardly a civil comment, is it.
A:
Non-obscene