In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: I know you despise bigots, ToTL, you have often spoken against them. I know you are a Christian.

All I said is that Trump didn't speak against the Bigots initially. Then he backed off yesterday. Today, he blames everyone as though the bigots are the same as those who despise bigotry. All I said, and I think it is true, is that as president, Hillary Clinton would have had no problem telling white nationalist bigots, the KKK, and the American NAZIs to stand down. Trump won't do it, Hillary would have done it.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: More crap by leftists who only want their "approved" opinions aired. All others are of course racists and bigots and hate speech. Not how this country works sweetie. And by the way, it wasn't a girl the article was about - a girl has a vagina - not a penis and testicles. Maybe you need to educate yourself a bit more.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: All these left wing Bishops together, is going to lead to more fornication and sacrilegious communions.and Spadaros orgy parties.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit