We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
--------
Question: Sent1: Machine gns are currently legal (despite an unconstitutional tax that is required to purchase one) and there has NEVER been a single case of a private citizen using a legally owned machine gun to commit a crime.
Sent2: Many thousands of Guns are stolen and used in GUN CREATED CRIME because most legal gun owners

Answer: Not similar

Question: Sent1: The legal market for firearms gets killed off in hopes of hindering criminals, and instead the criminals continue buying from the black market, importing them illegally, or making their weapons themselves.
Sent2: Well if criminals are getting their guns through licensed dealers, how come these records of sale aren't being used for the purpose of tracking down gang members who obviously bought their guns legally?

Answer: Not similar

Question: Sent1: Because the term "gun nut" has come to mean a disparaging remark about anybody that supports the individual rights interpretation of the Second Amendment, and favors gun ownership over gun bans.
Sent2: Anybody else in American history able to lend credibility to your belief that the Second Amendment was all about gun control and how gun ownership was never intended to be an individual right?

Answer:
Not similar