Problem: CHAPTER VII.

THE WALK HOME.

Mary Masters, when Reginald Morton had turned his back upon her at the bridge, was angry with herself and with him, which was reasonable; and very angry also with Larry Twentyman, which was unreasonable. As she had at once acceded to Morton's proposal that they should walk round the house together, surely he should not have deserted her so soon. It had not been her fault that the other man had come up. She had not wanted him. But she was aware that when the option had in some sort been left to herself, she had elected to walk back with Larry. She knew her own motives and her own feelings, but neither of the men would understand them. Because she preferred the company of Mr. Morton, and had at the moment feared that her sisters would have deserted her had she followed him, therefore she had declared her purpose of going back to Dillsborough, in doing which she knew that Larry and the girls would accompany her. But of course Mr. Morton would think that she had preferred the company of her recognised admirer. It was pretty well known in Dillsborough that Larry was her lover. Her stepmother had spoken of it very freely; and Larry himself was a man who did not keep his lights hidden under a bushel. "I hope I've not been in the way, Mary," said Mr. Twentyman, as soon as Morton was out of hearing.

"In the way of what?"
1. Who was upset?
2. Who she was angry with?
3. Was she upset with anyone else?
4. Did the author find her attitude rational?
5. Who left early?
6. Where were they at that time?
7. Did she agree with his request before that?
8. Who disrupted the plan?
9. Did she rather stay with him?
10. Was she aware of her own emotions?
11. What about the guys?
12. Did she like one over other?
13. Who was that?
14. But did she do otherwise?
15. Was she worried about any of her relatives?
16. Who was that?
17. What was her thought about her?
Answer: 1. Mary Masters
2. Reginald Morton
3. Larry Twentyman
4. No
5. Morton
6. walking round the house
7. Yes
8. Larry
9. No
10. Yes
11. No
12. Yes
13. Mr. Morton
14. yes
15. Yes
16. her sisters
17. unknown

Q: London, England (CNN) -- Former Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic finally took the stand Monday at the U.N.'s international tribunal at The Hague to defend himself against genocide charges stemming from the 1992-1995 Bosnian conflict.

For CNN's Senior International Correspondent Nic Robertson, the 64 year-old was as defiant and unrepentant as the man he recalled meeting outside Sarajevo in 1993-94, as Bosnian-Serb forces shelled the city.

Karadzic, who faces 11 charges of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide during the war, told the tribunal the Serb cause is "just and holy," and dismissed as myths two of the worst atrocities of a conflict that claimed 100,000 lives -- the three-year siege of Sarajevo and the Srebrenica massacre in 1995.

He even claimed that the image of the Muslims as victims was untrue and that they were the first to attack. Their fighters "had blood up to their shoulders," he said.

"I will defend that nation of ours and their cause that is just and holy," he said in his defiant opening statement. The aim of the "Muslim plotters," he added, was "100 percent power, as it was in the Ottoman Empire."

"This is reminiscent of those days," said Robertson, who reported from the Bosnian capital during the war. "These were the exact same justifications: 'we're the ones that had been under attack, we're the ones being wronged.'

"It's very telling that he's not trying to address specific issues, such as the Srebrenica massacre and such like, which are going to be the main parts of the prosecution.

Answer the following questions:
1. who is reporting?
2. his title?
3. who does he work for?
4. who is the report about?
5. his age?
6. did he do something bad?
7. where is the trial?
8. what is the charge?
9. anything else?
10. did many people die?
A: 1. Nic Robertson
2. Senior International Correspondent
3. CNN
4. Radovan Karadzic
5. 64
6. he is on trial for bad things
7. the U.N.'s international tribunal at The Hague
8. genocide
9. war crimes and crimes against humanity
10. yes

Problem: Sally was walking through the park. The bluebirds were singing and the weather was nice. She waved at her neighbor Jerry, who was taking his kitten out. Then she heard a loud noise. The noise was coming from a nearby tree. She walked over to the tree to take a look and found a puppy curled up by the roots. It was making a loud, sad noise. Sally bent down and picked up the puppy. It quickly quieted down, and licked her face. Sally laughed. The puppy was brown with white paws, and she thought it was the cutest puppy she ever saw. She couldn't find a tag on him, so she took him home. When she got home, she fed the puppy some meat that she had in her fridge. The puppy seemed to like it. She also gave him a bowl of water and he lapped it all up. Then the puppy yawned. Sally picked him up and brought him to her bed and put him on her pillow. Sally looked at him with a smile. "I'm going to call you...Jackson." Jackson wagged his tail a little, and fell asleep.
1. Where was she walking?
2. What was happening there?
3. Did she see anyone she knew
4. Who did she see?
5. What was he doing?
6. What grabbed her attention next?
7. What made it?
8. How did she interact with it?
9. How did it respond to that?
10. What color was it?
11. What did she think of it?
12. where did she bring it?
13. What did it eat?
14. Was it enjoyed?
15. Did it drink?
16. What did it drink?
17. Where did it sleep?
18. Did she name it?
19. What?
Answer:
1. Through the park.
2. Birds were singing in the sun.
3. Yes
4. Her neighbor Jerry.
5. Taking his kitten out.
6. A loud noise from a tree.
7. A puppy.
8. Sally bent down and picked up the puppy.
9. It quieted down, and licked her face.
10. brown with white paws.
11. It was cute.
12. Home.
13. meat
14. Yes
15. Yes
16. water
17. Her bed
18. Yes
19. Jackson