This deal discrepancy seems to have a few of us stumped - so I'm referring it to all of you in hopes that we can solve this today. Following are the terms of the deal: Short Term California buys Enron Energy Services Hours: HE 6-9 Delivery Point: SP-15 Term: 3/29/01 Price: $110 The deal was entered by Bert Meyers, a Real Time trader, on behalf of STCA. It was extended for HE 9 through 22 at a price of $160. In the spreadsheet Real Time sends to EES each day, it shows the deal as a sale at a price of $130, not a buy at a price of $160. My first instinct was to simply modify the spreadsheet to match the deal in Enpower, but EES claims they see the price coming across as $130. I'm reluctant to send any more incorrect information to EES, as we've already dealt with enough confusion over this matter. Please take a look at the deal and its corresponding documents, and let me know which is the correct price. Thanks for your help,
Answer: EPMI/EES Discrepancies - Deal 564094
For Massachusetts Electric Company and Navajo Tribal Utility Authority: you'll notice they want to trade power and we're shutting them down. Leslie has to call the counterparties and talk to them about their power status. They're not showing up on the FERC approved lists, so Leslie has to figure out how/if they can trade power.
Answer: Counterparty Approval List for 10/31/00
Eric told me to shoot you an email to bid on a free agent. I want to bid $5 on Mike Anderson of the Broncos. Let me know what else I need to do. Thanks,
Answer: Fantasy Football
All, We are currently working on the data model for the Trading Agreements System and have a question pertaining to internal/external counterparties. Are all agreements between an internal company(counterparty) and an external company(counterparty)? I spoke with Meredith Stewart (the data architect for this project) and she found an agreement between 2 internal counterparties, e.g. Enron Louisiana and ECT. Please let me know ASAP. Thanks,
Answer:
Counterparties