In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Wait for it. Who knows what we'll see. Will Trump want to hug him? Hit him? Cuddle Him? Have you seen Trump's handshake with the Jap PM this morning? Trump looks even sillier than usual and has the Jap leader rolling his eyes because of an overlong and aggressive handshake. I can't stand Justin Trudeau, but I wish him well against this monumental creep on Monday. One a light-minded and handsome Canadian and the other a self-obsessed and literally "loud and obnoxious" American. The world is already watching Trump very closely and I think that Justin will stand out during and after his visit to D.C. - literally because of his good-looks. 21st century man.
I want to see how their handshakes go on Monday - that could tell it all.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: Being gaslighted is like sex to progressive socialist democrats.
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: From the article: "Soon after, he was summoned to a meeting with Dave Williford, Oregon's director of football communications, and told the athletic department had considered revoking one of the Emerald's credentials for a game against Oregon State as punishment."

Actually, if "punishment" is determined by the number of credentials issued then it would seem Williford should have INCREASED the number so as more Emerald staff could watch what was a ridiculous excuse of a football team this past season!
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit