Question: Sentence A: Lawyers know how to make landlords heat apartments so the medical treatment can stick.

Sentence B: They wanted to make sure their clients rights were being observed.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Not to agree to an unsettling and impossible trade, but to judge their real purposes.
They wanted to judge their actual purposes.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Further, the visa is terminated at any time the H-2A worker's employment relationship ends, whether through voluntary departure or involuntary termination.

Here is a hypothesis:
If the worker is no longer employed, the visa will be terminated.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: I actually did and do want this man to represent the United States--that's why I voted for him twice.

Sentence 2: He'll make a good president--I voted for him twice.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
If the zinc story were an isolated anecdote, it would be merely amusing.

Does it follow that "The zinc story is not, in fact, an isolated anecdote."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Of course, it is always possible that an unbalanced individual will misunderstand something in a crazy way, as John Hinckley did with Taxi Driver . But you can't protect yourself against the criminally insane by cutting off their sources of possible inspiration, which are limitless.", can we conclude that "Unbalanced individuals are actually more likely than most to interpret things sanely, objectively, and with no shortage of insight."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no