Question: Sentence A: Golden Buddha statues in several of Buddha's aspects adorn the temples, and overlooking them is the 17-story Flower Pagoda, a slender relic of the Song dynasty (a.d.960 1279).

Sentence B: The 17-story Flower Pagoda dates back to the Song dynasty.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: As a practical matter, mailers are believed in many cases to be able to do this work for a fraction of the cost the postal service would face.
Mailers generally tend to be cheaper because they are women.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Finally, the Chinese say that the State Department impounded the Loral findings before they ever reached them.

Here is a hypothesis:
Pinochet has now been reigned in as the Chinese Supreme Ruler, decreeing that war must be waged against the USA due to the difficulties faced with the Loral findings.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: didn't purchase

Sentence 2: Did not buy.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
You know, the champion kite-golfer from San Prego.

Does it follow that "The champion kite-golfer from San Prego, you know."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "In those circumstances, Dr. Astrov in Uncle Vanya might have written it.", can we conclude that "In that case I suppose, Dr. Astrov in Uncle Vanya might have written it."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes