Here is an email: Laura, Here's the revised version: Here's a compared version so you will know what I did: I'll work on the transfer price agreement today or this weekend so we will have something to discuss. I'm planning on being in Chicago on Thursday if you would like to discuss any of these matters. Kay
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Manlove monetization
Q: Tracy, As discussed, the EEOS functions, including NEPCO, previously turned in to Corp are defined as follows: Commercial - Includes Engineering, Project Management, Construction Management and Business Development. Logistics - Includes Procurement. Other Mid-Office - Includes Project Controls, Estimating, QA, Contracts and Administration. Legal - Includes Legal. Accounting/Audit/Finance/Treasury - Includes Accounting & Finance Information Technology - Includes IT personnel Human Resources - Includes HR personnel Executive - Includes the Presidents of EEOS & NEPCO and other Nepco Executive staff. Other - Includes Nepco rent and employees for Caxios, Nepco Europe, OEC & EPIC. Do you need these defined further than this? I did not include the obvious functions Enron Property Services or severance. Blake
Propose a subject line
A: G&A Function definitions
IN: Hey, how are you doing? I've heard so much shit going on about Enron in the news. Are you still using this address or is the yahoo one still active. Anyway, I'll be sending you both and just reply to inform me which one you are using now. I hope that all is well with you. Cliff

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Hi!
IN: This is an email
I am assuming these were the last contracts. They are the last ones I was forwarded any how. None the less, my top two concerns Today: I assume we are going to compare the predicted economics to the actual economics then look at alternatives to options in Sun Devil (Like a GE turbine) I've got an idea of what we can do for the fuel portion of this deal if we do look at turbines. One of the issues dicussed in detail before we did this project with ECS was WHY is TW doing a deal with ECS versus a stand alone deal. If I remember correctly, the pitch to FERC was that TW did not have the expertise to facilitate a peak avoidance alone. Mary Kay Miller should remember these details...

What is the subject?

OUT: Gallup Final Docs
QUESTION: POSREP HOEGH GALLEON, DATE: 24-May 12:00 10:00 (UTC) A) Position at noon: N 36 25 E 13 55 B) Dist. From last noon: 294 nm C) Dist. To go to next port: 946 nm D) ETA next port: ALGECIRAS 27 06:00 LT E) 1: Average sea/wind Sea: NW 3 Wind: NW 2 2: Average speed 11.76 kn RPM: 60.93 3: BOG consumed 137 m3 4: BOG Total 137 m3 5: F.O Consumed 22 m3 6: G.O. Consumed 0 m3 7: Average vapor press Average liq. Temp: Tk1: 0.143 bar -158.3 ?C
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: POSREP MAY 24TH
IN: Doyle I, L.L.C., ENA, NEPCO, EE&CC and Power Generation Investco, L.L.P., as insureds/assignees under a policy of insurance issued by Factory Mutual Insurance Co. ("FM"), may file suit on Friday, November 9, 2001, against FM for a breach of contract and bad faith with regard to payment of a claim of approximately $6,200,000 for an insured loss that occurred on or about June 14, 2000, when the Unit #1 engine at the Doyle I, L.L.C. facility located at Monroe, Georgia, failed. If you are aware of any reason that suit should not be filed , please call Britt Davis at (713) 853-6307 or email him at britt.davis@enron.com <mailto:britt.davis@enron.com>. If he does not hear from you by Thursday, November 8 at 5:00 p.m., he will assume you have no objection to the filing of this suit. Sent on behalf of Britt Davis

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
In re Doyle Claim Against Underwriters