QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A bike messenger walking in the park."
Hypothesis: "A bike messenger is walking in the park as a shortcut to his destination."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. We cannot infer that a man is walking in the park because it is a shortcut to his destination.
Answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "An oriental woman on a crowded street pointing."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The woman is on an abandoned corner." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. An oriental woman though gender specific still is very general and can mean many where the woman still implies only one. Crowed is the direct opposite of abandoned.
Answer is no.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A nice brick and stone building outside with a woman seen walking a baby carriage." can we conclude that "A woman is walking with her baby."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. A woman seen walking a baby carriage is with her baby.
Answer is yes.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A shirtless african american wearing black pants is jogging along side a lake." can we conclude that "A woman is working out on a treadmill."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

SOLUTION:
Let's solve this gradually. When a woman can work the African American wearing treadmill in outside a lake.
Answer is no.