In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[EX Q]: Comment: Will Alaskans reject Miller again? One can only hope.
[EX A]: Agree

[EX Q]: Comment: To say nothing about the oil tankers coming up the St. Lawrence to Montreal.
[EX A]: Agree

[EX Q]: Comment: I have known Cathy's family all my life, and watched her grow up. She has been clueless since she started high school, and I was astonished that she was elected first to the CBJ Assembly, and then was able to defeat a far more able and intelligent incumbent for the House (I live in Juneau but not in her district). She is totally unable to perceive how most people who were not raised in the protective cocoon of a rich Old Juneau family (fish processing and brokering, then commercial and rental real estate) live. The Republican establishment loved her, as did ALEC, because she can't think for herself and instead believes people simply because they are friends, family, or Republicans.

And yes, she should resign. Since she won't, suburban Juneau voters should elect Justin Parrish, her opponent.
[EX A]:
Agree