Question:
Based on the premise "It still holds on to its original name of Krutenau (Vegetable Waterway).", can we conclude that "Whilst it still currently retains its original name, its title may change in the future. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: To appreciate the full impact of the whole work, view it in reverse order, starting at the far end with the stately sculpted polychrome wooden panel of Saints Augustine, Anthony, and Jerome, carved by Niklaus Hagenauer.

Sentence B: To appreciate the full impact of the whole work, you must view it from a laptop whilst sipping the finest Earl Grey from the sculpted cup of Jerome.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: The NYT scrupulously corrects a prior misstatement of the words making up the acronym of the James Bond nemesis organization SPECTRE.
The NYT made up the James Bond acronym SPECTRE.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Bull, he croaked.

Here is a hypothesis:
He remained silent.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: yeah so that's a tough conference

Sentence 2: It's a weak conference.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"The comment received in response to the IRFA concerned the impact of the proposed rule on small entities that manage funds regulated under ERISA."
Hypothesis: No comments were received in response to the IRFA.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no