You will be given a context and a verb separated with a newline character, and you have to answer if the given verb can be anchored in time or not. We say a verb can be anchored in the real timeline if and only if a verb happened in the past, is happening now, or is guaranteed to happen in the future. The output should be "Yes" if the verb can be anchored in time and "No" otherwise.
--------
Question: His presence on American soil is necessary to dispel doubts about his fitness as a father _ raised maliciously by Elian's Miami relatives _ and to end speculation that he is indifferent about reclaiming custody of his son. With Gonzalez all but out of sight in Cuba, the relatives have had a free hand to (distort) the case with bogus legal arguments and unsubstantiated claims that Elian is afraid to see his father.
Verb: distort

Answer: No

Question: Bishop Henry Mansell of the Archdiocese of Buffalo said it was an act of madness, but he went on to defend the Church's opposition to abortion as respecting of human life in all its forms, especially the most vulnerable. Susan Dudley, deputy director of the National Abortion Federation, assailed the remarks and called on anti-abortion groups to (shift) their tactics.
Verb: shift

Answer: No

Question: As talk on the streets swirled, talks between lawyers for Elian's Miami relatives and government officials crept to an uneventful close. U.S. Immigration officials postponed until Tuesday morning any action on revoking the boy's temporary permission to stay in the United States, which would allow federal officials to, ultimately, (take) the boy from his relatives' house and eventually return him to Cuba.
Verb: take

Answer:
No