In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: Amazingly the media has not emphasized the obvious hypocrisy. The USA has killed thousands of innocent women and children since 2001 in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria. Moreover, we have never agreed to the bans on most chemical weapons ourselves. Don't get taken on this one guys. Trump is as phony and as inconsistent as they come.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Right Steve, because the McGuinty, Butts, Wynne's "green" plan is paying off in spades... the Ontario Liberals are a national embarrassment, they have no credibility and their "green" plan has turned out to be an absolute failure. Canadians who actually work for a living understand this, the smug limousine liberals who will be protected by fat golden pensions couldn't care less about rising costs of living and weaker economic competitiveness, it's not going to have any material impact on Wynne's ability to sip daiquiris in Cabo. This new tax will hurt working Canadians with higher living expenses and less economic opportunity.Trudeau operates with a smug sense of unearned entitlement, he lives in a cushioned dream of puff and ignorance. Butts sewered Ontario and now he wants to double down with the same incompetent policies on the rest of Canada.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: You're ignorant of the Church's practice in the past. Women in abusive relationships were routinely counseled by their priests to stick it out.... this is not ingnorance on the woman's part, but obedience to an authority. This is well documented and fortunately the Church has corrected that error in praxis and thank goodness woman began listening to themselves

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****