In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
One example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution is here: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Explanation: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

Now, solve this: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Grand Jury Reform Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds the following:
(1) Grand juries are typically used as the process by which
allegations of police misconduct are prosecuted.
(2) There exists a symbiotic relationship between local
prosecutors and the law enforcement officers who regularly
testify in routine grand jury investigations.
(3) The closeness of this relationship creates public
suspicion that accused police officers receive preferential
consideration from grand juries when they are subject to grand
jury investigations.
(4) Police officers have the right to appear before the
grand jury investigating allegations of wrongdoing by said
officer, and give testimony not subject to a thorough cross
examination.
(5) Grand jury proceedings are by law secret proceedings.
(6) The secret grand jury process has historically resulted
in a refusal to indict when the subject of their investigation
is a local law enforcement officer.
(7) The recent grand jury proceedings following the deaths
of Michael Brown and Eric Garner have followed historical
tradition, ending with a refusal to indict the law enforcement
officers involved in their deaths.
(8) The American people have lost confidence in the
secretive grand jury process when it is used to evaluate
allegations of police misconduct.
(9) The loss of confidence in our system of justice leads
to the undermining of the principles of equality and justice
upon which this country was founded.
(10) Preliminary hearings are often replaced with direct
presentments, whereby the prosecutor may send a case directly
to the grand jury without a public preliminary hearing.

SEC. 3. HEARING BEFORE A JUDGE REQUIRED.

(a) Receipt of Grant Funds.--In order for a State or unit of local
government in a State to be eligible to receive Federal funding under
subpart 1 of part E of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe
Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3750 et seq.), the State shall comply
with the requirements of this section.
(b) Notification Requirements.--
(1) Notification to prosecutor.--In the case of a law
enforcement officer of a local law enforcement agency who uses
deadly force against a person in the course of the officer's
employment, and thereby causes the death of that person, not
later than 24 hours after the death occurs, the chief officer
of the law enforcement agency of the locality in which the
death occurred shall report the death to the elected prosecutor
of that locality.
(2) Notification to governor.--Not later than 24 hours
after receiving notice under paragraph (1), the elected
prosecutor of the locality in which the death occurred shall
report the death to the Governor of that State.
(c) Hearing Requirement; Appointment of Special Prosecutor.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 3 days after receiving
notice under subsection (b)(2), the Governor of the State in
which the death occurred shall appoint a special prosecutor to
present evidence on behalf of the State at a hearing before a
judge in the appropriate court, in order to determine whether
probable cause exists for the State to bring criminal charges
against the law enforcement officer relating to the death of
the person, which determination shall be made by the judge. The
Governor shall use a random process to select the special
prosecutor from among all of the elected prosecutors in the
State, excluding the elected prosecutor of the locality in
which the death occurred.
(2) Timing.--The hearing described in paragraph (1) shall
be held not later than 90 days after the appointment of the
special prosecutor, unless the judge determines that good cause
exists to delay the hearing.
(3) Court to remain open to the public.--Except as
determined appropriate by the presiding judge, in a hearing
described in paragraph (1), the court shall remain open to the
public, and upon scheduling the hearing the judge shall provide
notice to the public of the date, time, and location of the
hearing.
(d) State Law Enforcement Agency To Have Exclusive Authority Over
Investigation.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 24 hours after receiving
notice under subsection (b)(2), the Governor shall report the
death to the chief officer of the State law enforcement agency
of the State in which the death occurred, and the State law
enforcement agency shall assume exclusive control of the
investigation of the death during the pendency of the probable
cause hearing.
(2) Cooperation of local law enforcement agency.--The chief
officer of the law enforcement agency of the locality in which
the death occurred shall cooperate with the special prosecutor
and the chief officer of the State law enforcement agency by
responding promptly to requests for information related to the
death.
(e) Written Determination of Probable Cause.--Not later than 5 days
after the conclusion of a hearing described in subsection (c), the
judge presiding over the hearing shall issue the determination
described in subsection (c) in writing, and shall submit such
determination to the elected prosecutor of the locality in which the
death occurred. Such determination shall be made available to the
public.
(f) Recommendations of the Special Prosecutor.--Upon the conclusion
of a hearing described in subsection (c), the special prosecutor shall
submit written recommendations to the elected prosecutor of the
locality in which the death occurred, including a recommendation
regarding whether criminal charges should be brought against the law
enforcement officer relating to the death of the person.
(g) Tolling of Procedural Deadlines.--Any applicable filing or
other procedural deadlines are tolled during the pendency of the
hearing described in subsection (c).
(h) Preservation of Prosecutorial Discretion.--The hearing
described in subsection (c) shall be purely advisory, and shall have no
binding effect on the elected prosecutor of the locality in which the
death occurred. After the conclusion of the hearing described in
subsection (c), the elected prosecutor of the locality in which the
death occurred shall retain prosecutorial discretion as to whether to
bring charges against the law enforcement officer, including whether to
hold a grand jury proceeding in the appropriate court.
Solution:
Grand Jury Reform Act of 2015 Conditions a state or local government's eligibility for funding under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program on the state's compliance with this Act. Requires: (1) the chief officer of the law enforcement agency of a locality in which a death results from the use of deadly force by a law enforcement officer of such agency to report the death to the elected prosecutor of that locality within 24 hours of such death, and (2) the elected prosecutor to report the death to the governor of the state within 24 hours after receiving such notice. Directs the governor: (1) within three days after receiving such report, to appoint a special prosecutor to present evidence on the state's behalf at a hearing before a judge to determine whether probable cause exists to bring criminal charges against the law enforcement officer; (2) to use a random process to select the special prosecutor from among all of the elected prosecutors in the state, excluding the elected prosecutor of the locality in which the death occurred; and (3) within 24 hours after being notified of such death, to report the death to the chief officer of the state's law enforcement agency, which shall assume exclusive control of the investigation of the death during the pendency of the probable cause hearing. Requires: (1) the hearing to be held within 90 days after the appointment of the special prosecutor, unless the judge determines that good cause exists to delay it; (2) the court to remain open to the public for such hearing, except as determined appropriate by the presiding judge; (3) the presiding judge, within five days of the hearing's conclusion, to issue a determination regarding probable cause and to submit such determination to the elected prosecutor of the locality in which the death occurred; and (4) the special prosecutor to submit recommendations to the elected prosecutor, including regarding whether criminal charges should be brought against the officer. Declares that the probable cause hearing shall have no binding effect on the elected prosecutor.