Question: Sentence A: uh but when they revamped the you know supposedly making things more fair um i've heard a lot of different arguments uh pro and con about whether we should allow deductions for sales tax or even uh maybe we should put more emphasis on sales tax because when you think about it the people that purchase more items are the ones that are better able to pay the taxes

Sentence B: Everyone agrees that sales tax deductions should be allowed.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Good afternoon, I said pleasantly.
Get out of here!
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Nearby is a monument to mark the spot where Joan was burned at the stake in 1431.

Here is a hypothesis:
A monument marks the spot where Joan was burned at the stake in 1432.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Did you mean to warn me against Mrs. Vandemeyer?

Sentence 2: Why didn't you warn me against Mrs. Vandemeyer?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
A more compelling explanation is that Ellison wanted to write a second novel that would meet the standard of Invisible Man while being an entirely different kind of book.

Does it follow that "Ellison was unaware of a novel titled Invisible Man."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "Even if we stopped killings everywhere, we couldn't do so without killing people ourselves.", can we conclude that "We could stop killings everywhere, but we'd have to kill ourselves, and we are fine with that. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell