In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: Yes, your analysis is crap. Your first statement is apples and oranges. The Canadian soldiers don't have to sue to get their benefits (although Harper was headed that way). You haven't read the case so you have no clue what it was actually about. Finally, the "lefties" applaud getting the damn thing over with at a lower cost. Your problem was with the 3 previous governments, this part of things was inevitable. Harper (he did love losing at the Supeme Court)would likely have been stupid enough to fight it and triple the cost.
Obscene

Comment: Until this denomination starts to heal its own divisions, don't attempt to foist your dysfunction on the rest of society.

Out, out, damned spot!
Obscene

Comment: Please everyone remember we do not know that David smoked marijuana or drink or anything else all we know is that one of the many evil people that murdered him said he was . that does not mean he was or was not ! then definitely not a reason to be tortured and murdered I'm just saying I keep seeing over and over That he was smoking weed if he was or wasn't it's not a factor to kill or harm the point is we really have no proof of that only the Police have that information . the psychopathic narcissistic killers and the corner report
Non-obscene