In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: This is a terrible tragedy and and an utter travesty!!! We must tell Western and other world governments to stop pandering and kowtowing to the Chinese government and official Chinese interests! This includes strong messaging for the Canadian government and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Due to economics and fear of conflict, we in the 'free world' sacrifice our ethics and become complicit by ignoring the truths and pushing under the carpet everything that makes us feel uncomfortable or that pricks at our conscience. The term "human rights" loses its power and meaning, becoming trivialized and overused, its impact weakening and its punch losing its weight. The goals and ideals associated with 'human rights' begin drifting, becoming more unattainable, distant, uncertain and remote. We become detached from these goals and ideals and from ourselves. An encouraging sign with letter to China from 10 governments, including Canada, but that is a drop in the bucket.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: Rules about sex, formulated by the celibate, based on dubious interpretations of scripture (which says NOTHING about oral sex, for example) and grounded in the silly opinion that sexual activity has to be "justified" by saying it must be for procreation (a view that owes more to the Gnostics, the Neoplatonists and the Roman Stoics than scripture) are less than compelling.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: ....raped more women without their consent..

Clearly DunthorpeMD has some confusion about what constitutes rape. All non-consensual sex is rape. Duh!
Sexual-explicit