I will be leaving the office today at 4:00 for a very important doctor's appointment. Also, please note that I will be leaving the office at the same time on Thursday and will not be in the office on Friday . I will be traveling to Louisiana for a funeral.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Early Departures
MAKE PLANS NOW to ATTEND the PREMIER ENERGY EVENT of 2002! 12th ANNUAL NESA ENERGY EXPO April 29 through May 2, 2002 George R. Brown Convention Center Houston, Texas *Register by Friday, February 15, 2002 and your name will be entered into a drawing for tickets to see BROOKS & DUNN at the Houston Livestock Show and Rodeo on Tuesday, February 19. LIMITED NUMBER of NESA ENERGY GALA TICKETS available prior to March 15, 2002. NESA Members and Energy Expo Exhibitors are receiving this advance notice of Registration Information for Energy Expo 2002 - make sure to respond as soon as possible to guarantee availability!
Answer: NESA ENERGY EXPO 2002
Here is an email: Will you send me the file for the west indices dating back to Oct? Monthly and daily prices and their spreads to the Hub would be nice. Thanks,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Gas Daily, NGI, and IF historicals
Q: Jack: I just spoke with Karola and she tells me that you want to talk about the guaranty. I didn't recall if you had ever reviewed our proposed format. Also, I am aware that Enron Corp. previously issued a "General Guarantee Agreememt" on behalf of Enron North America Corp. (formerly, Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.) on January 28, 1998. Which format are you interested in using? Our cap for financial transactions with PG&E is, I believe, $10 million. Please give me a call as I am the first point of contact for negotiating the guaranty. Thanks. Sara
Propose a subject line
A: Enron Corp. guaranty in favor of PG&E
IN: Joe, presented below is the first memo I sent out concering the air permit issue: [Yesterday evening I phoned both the state of Arizona ( agency for stations 1 and 2) and Region 9 EPA ( agency for stations 3 and 4) concerning the status of when the air permits would be issued by both agencies for the Redrock expansion. I was surprised to find out that both agencies stated a 2-4 month delay prior to issuance. They cited back log of other permits, public comment periods, and workload as being the main reasons. I am particularily disappointed because there were pre meetings with both agencies identifying what was to be included in each application package, and even after the applications were submitted in March of this year, each agency came back and asked for different information that from what was discussed at each meeting. I have a call into the state of Arizona ( construction is to begin at Station 2 and they have jurisdiction for this station) to see if we can initiate some construction activities such as laying pipe and building foundations prior to receiving the permit. I have been given these types of approvals from other agencies in the past, but these types of approvals are extremely narrow and restrictive. If this flys I am sure that they will require us to make sure the turbine is not brought on site until the permit has been issued. I know this will require written approval from the agency, but this may allow us to proceed on schedule and avoid any delays. Ill keep you apprised of this issue.] I spoke with the ADEQ after our conference call and they directed me to another group (compliance) in the air permit section. They strongly suggested that I contact the compliance group before contacting Nancy Wrona, Director of the ADEQ. I left a message with the supervisor of the ADEQ compliance section, Kathy McConnell (?) 602-207-2328, but have not heard back from her. Either Bill Kendrick or I will be touching base with her again, tomorrow. Arnold has given me the following list of construction items he would like to have the ADEQ grant us permission/waiver to do in leau of receiving the air permits: all earthwork trench construction and piping tie ins all foundation and building construction installation of ancillary equipment This list is probably too aggressive and falls out of what the agency may allow us to do.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Redrock Permit Issue, Requested Information
IN: This is an email
Heather, Attached is the CA we discussed. I changed the last paragraph to add the expiration of the exclusivity provision, as I think this is probably a bit easier to enforce. Kay

What is the subject?

OUT:
NJNG CA