Question:
Based on the premise "The WP reports that following a year of sensitive negotiations, the German government has finally agreed to spend $110 million to compensate 18,000 Jewish victims of the Nazis who are living in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.", can we conclude that "The German government decided to give money to Jews to help them."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: The purpose here is not to provide reasons or to quantify why the mailer/competitor might be able to do the work for less than the postal service, despite the likelihood that the mailer/competitor's scale of operations will be smaller.

Sentence B: The purpose is to give reasons why the mailer might be cheaper than the postal service.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: To most participants, the pig symbolizes greed.
To most politicians a pig is a symbol of greed.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
He's a wimp for succumbing to a couple of right-wing punks (Sens.

Here is a hypothesis:
He plans to reverse his decision and stand up to the right wing couple.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Where there is money, there is shopping or so it should seem.

Sentence 2: People with money want to spend it.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"never show any anyway anything that i ever wanted i rented a lot of videos because the closest movie theater was Barry Saint Edmunds and who wants who wants to drive twenty miles to go to the movies"
Hypothesis: I always went to see movies on opening day.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no