Here is an email: Tana, This isn't something we worked on. I know the NNG and TW have been= =20 using EOL to auction capacity, so this is probably something the TW=20 attorney's have worked on. Not sure. Let me know if I can be of any help.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: I believe these are yours
Q: Brian, good memo - I think you mean't Energy Capital Resources not Enron Capital Resources in your memo. I would distribute widely in the management ranks. Regards
Propose a subject line
A: Tech Services
IN: Ben, Who can know go in an change Vac time....Joe Stepenovitch should have been marked VACATION TIME FOR MAY 15th - 18th, (32 hours total) and he was not. I can not go that far back. Can we please have someone change this so his time will be correct? Thanks for your help,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Change Vac. Time
IN: This is an email
Rob, independent of dotted/solid lines, you already have the primary and complete responsibility to manage the office and the business. At the risk of being bold, I think the undercurrent of your note and your discussions with Haedicke over the last couple of days is a matter of absolute control. Ownership and passion are important characteristics of our best commercial people but so is fostering a diversity of opinions and ideas. With the back and mid office, the current Enron model is based upon scale and standardization which generates tremendous operating leverage. Further, it helps us manage risk and is a board mandated control issue. In the long-run, it is actually less costly (ie) systems that don't work together, less transferable human capital, un-managed legal risks, etc. A lot of your points are very valid and Haedicke has never and never will get in the way of managing commercial business; however, Mark, Wes, Sally, Beth et al have a mandate to provide a flexible, scalable but standardized delivery mechanism, that manages our risk across the broad empire. Don't quit protecting the business and your people; however, please help accomplish some of these goals as well. In short, I would like to keep the reporting structures the same. Lets take the earliest opporunity to discuss this. Regards

What is the subject?

OUT: Reporting Structure
QUESTION: I am trying to pull together a QBR for Dave and Mark Frevert. Would Tuesday August 29th from 1:00 pm to 4:00 pm. work for everyone? Thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Coal & Emissions QBR
IN: Mr. Lay We are getting blasted in the news and a lot of the information is false. There is NO one there to tell the complete truth. Americans are getting the news that the media wants them to hear and it is not the full truth. Don't we need a spokesman to counter the lies? In the end even if there were no wrong doing, it won't matter because the media (and politicians) have said the same lies over and over and finally Americans believe it no matter if it is the truth or not. Day after day they have people on who say, "I heard that Enron has fired 20,000 employees". They never have someone on that really knows. And, "Enron benefited from 17 provisions in this law". WELL - - so did Dynegy, and Williams and El Paso and on and on. And, "Enron only paid taxes one out of five years". WELL - - how many large companies did the same? And, "Ken Lay called O'Neil". WELL - - how many CEO's of large companies called him? No one is there to represent Enron. Enron has done things wrong, but it doesn't help if no one is there to stop the half truths and flat out lies. Please allow someone who has the knowledge and skills to go on TV and tell both sides. Thanks. Cecil

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
Half truths