Problem: Here is a premise:
yeah i just heard about this last week uh they were bragging about it with uh uh

Here is a hypothesis:
They shouldn't have been talking about it.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Cholesterol isn't necessarily unhealthy, and margarine is as bad as butter.

Sentence 2: Cholesterol can be ok for you.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
In Hong Kong, the South China Morning Post, under the headline U.S.

Does it follow that "The South China Morning Post is the biggest newspaper in China."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If Rockefeller's addiction to living in an expensive realm of his own, for creating his own entourage, ultimately accounted for Gerald Ford's decision to toss Rockefeller overboard and pick Bob Dole as his running mate in 1976 (something that will presumably be discussed in Reich's next book)., can we say that "Rockefeller was addicted to expensive things."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
" This book began with the axiomatic statement that the symbol is the thing."
Hypothesis: The book made no statement and made no sense.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: In the absence of malign government intervention, there will emerge what he calls spontaneous order.

Sentence 2: If the government intervenes and tried to make a mess of things, spontaneous order will occur in spite of it.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no