input question: There's nothing to worry about in this best-of-all-possible- If this premise is true, does that tell us:"You should not be concerned."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Then the Postal Service could make wide-ranging adjustments of the rates in the subclass, including contract rates for some of the subclass users, as long as the average rate for the subclass does not go below the inverse cap.", can we conclude that "The Postal Service should charge whatever price it wants without regard for average subclass rate."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: uh no probably south maybe Texas actually

Sentence B: The person discusses something about Texas.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Offshore, snorkellers are required, for safety reasons, to tow a marker buoy.
Several swimmers have drowned near here in the last 10 years.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
and they can just dip it and they shell it as they eat it

Here is a hypothesis:
They dip it in the garlic butter and slurp it out of the shell.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
The final rule preempts all state and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with the final rule, has no retroactive effect, and does not require administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.

Does it follow that "Many cases were filed in court challenging this rule. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell