In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: When will the fans know when the "social issues" have satisfactorily been addressed so the nonsense kneeling stops? How will that be measured?

Output: Non-obscene

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Anyone can cast their eyes a couple of inches up, where my comment says this:
"The United States is a great country in many ways, but that's an element of dysfunctional culture...."

StewartBrian, your reply smacks of eyes too blinded with rage to read the words on the screen.

Output: Non-obscene

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Apparently feminist "theologians" or commentators know much more about the mind of God than did Jesus Himself.
It seems a silly exercise to me to change the lyrics to match one's ill-conceived concept of a gendered God counter to all Scriptural and Doctrinal references to Him as Father, King, etc. despite the fact that the Church has always understood that Father is not a gendered identity but a relationship. It's an exercise in idolatry.
I will say that WRT "Holy God We Praise Thy Name" that goddess fits the measure better than "Go-od", but in the second verse you are still left with the problem of making a two syllable word stretch for three notes; "Fa-ah-ther" and the proposed "Mo-uh-ther".
Output: Non-obscene