We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: The argument for the death penalty as a deterrent has been proved wrong by the implementation of it through history.
Sent2: If there was another factor, then there would have already been arguments against this study using other studies produced by the opponents of the death penalty to proved this theory wrong.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: You need to find lots more for the death penalty to save more lives than innocents that have been executed by it.
Sent2: There has been so much cases of people who have been executed, only to be found innocent after their death.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: I say that they should be killed the same way that the person(s) that they killed were.
Sent2: I'm not saying that a child's life is worth more than an adults, I'm saying if they killed any one they forfeit their life, because they in return lose what they took from someone else.
[EX A]:
Not similar