Generate an explanation for the given claim using the provided supporting material from the paragraph. Please consider the following points while generating an output. 1) The claim will always have supporting proof in the paragraph, and the paragraph will have a clear point of view supporting the claim. 2) There can be instances where direct correlation to the claim is not available. Make use of the sentences in the paragraph to provide a corresponding output supporting the claim. 3) The explanation should be at least one and at most twelve sentences long.

[EX Q]: Paragraph: "The story mentions that 30 capsules ofOSR#1 cost $60. It would have been nice had the story also includedinformation about the amount of active ingredient per capsuleand the manufacturer's recommendeddosage. This wouldhave allowed readers to make a better calculation as to the financial impact oftreatment. This is critical information consideringthese costs will be borne out of pocket by anyone usingOSR #1. The storyjuxtaposes a light-hearted""success story""with information about the industrial uses of OSR #1 for removing toxic heavy metals from contaminated soil. This is a clever way ofway of emphasizingthat the use of this product is based entirely on anecdote. The storyclearly states that there is no credible evidence supporting the efficacy of the product. The harms of this product are impossible to quantify, given that it doesn't seem to have been studied in humans or in animals. The story notes that otherchelating drugs carry ""significant risks""and ""can strip the body of metals necessary for health."" It would have been nice to see more specifics about what chelators can do, but the story satisfies the critierion. The story states that medical searches turned up no papers about OSR#1, and that the companywhich makesthe productprovided nopublished studies about its use. The story rightly suggests that this total lack of evidenceshould be deeply troubling. The story doesn't exaggerate the prevalence or severity of autism, or of the potentially toxic compounds sometimes used to treat it. The story quotes multiple experts on pharmacology and an FDA spokesperson. It also quotes from an interview with Boyd Haley, president of the company which makes OSR#1. It attempted to get a reaction from Kim Stagliano, an OSR #1 proponent, but this effort was not successful. While the story mentions that there other are chelation drugs out there, it could have mentioned that there areeducational strategies which can be helpful for children with autism and which have betterevidence to support their use. The story states that OSR#1 is, according to the manufacturer'swebsite, available onlythrough dentists' or doctors' offices. Itnotes, however,that theTribune was able to buy 30 capsules of the productdirectly from a compounding pharmacy listed on the site. We areimpressed that the Tribune went to these lengths toestablish the product's availability. The story provides a fairly detailedpedigree for OSR #1and discusses itssimilarity to other chelation therapiesused in the treatment of autism. It also gives credit to blogger Kathleen Seidel for being the first to raiseconcerns aboutOSR #1 in her blog, Neurodiversity.com The story is well sourced and is not based on a press release." Claim: Industrial chemical OSR#1 used as autism treatment
[EX A]: "The product known as OSR #1 contains a chemical originally intended for clean-up of toxic waste at industrial sites. This story by the Chicago Tribune (which was republished by the Los Angeles Times) examineshow,despite a total lack of any researchon the product in humans,OSR#1 ended up being marketedas a ""dietary supplement"" for childrenwith autism. The story does an especially good job of pointing out the regulatory gaps whichcan allowrisky, poorly researchedproductsto be sold as ""cures"" to desperate parents and caregivers. It's an example of health journalism doing what it'ssupposed to do, and doing it well. Autism is a serious disorder which affects a growing number of children and their families and for which there are few goodtreatment options. Thisis asituation ripe for abuse by overzealous advocates andunscrupulous marketersof uNPRoven therapies. AsBoyd Haley, president of the company thatmake thethe OSR#1 supplement, puts it:""There are so many snake oil salesmen out there, it's just incredible."""

[EX Q]: Paragraph: The black rhinos died of salt poisoning following the decision by the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) to ignore water test results in Tsavo East National Park, the committee's report said. The deaths of the endangered animals, being moved to a more secure home in the face of the threat from poachers, were a major embarrassment to Kenya, which sells itself as destination for wildlife tourism. The inquiry said WWF, which donated $1 million for the relocation in June 2018, applied pressure on KWS to speed up the process in a bid to generate positive publicity and secure funding for itself from Germany. WWF denied the allegations in the inquiry report, which was made public last week, saying KWS had carried out hydrological surveys and given assurances the park was safe and suitable. "At no point either before or during the translocations were any issues raised about the quality of the water on the site," WWF said by email. "We would never push for a translocation to go ahead against the recommendations of the relevant experts. This was a tragedy we hope will never be repeated." The parliamentary committee's inquiry said the relocation took place during a period in 2018 when the term of one KWS board had ended and before a new one had begun, creating a lack of oversight. The report said KWS's former board of trustees had rejected the relocation three times in part because of the high salinity levels of the drinking water in the park. The report said Najib Balala, the minister of tourism and wildlife, should take overall responsibility for the rhinos' deaths because he delayed the appointment of the new KWS board. The minister's spokesman declined to comment. The KWS could not be immediately reached to comment. However, Richard Leakey, former chairperson of KWS, told the inquiry: "WWF-Kenya, as the funding entity, was alleged to have had a major interference onthe board resolution against the translocation, and consequently pushed for theexercise after the exit of the board." WWF said it was saddened by the loss of the rhinos and it fully recognized the "serious failings of this operation". "In response, we have strengthened existing practices and implemented brand new organizational guidelines to mitigate future risk as far as possible." Kenya had a rhino population of 1,258 in 2017 of which 745 were black rhinos, 510 were southern white rhinos and three were northern white rhinos, having grown from less than 400 rhinos in the 1980s. Poaching has risen in recent years across sub-Saharan Africa where well-armed criminal gangs have killed elephants for tusks and rhinos for horns. Often the animal parts are shipped to Asia for use in ornaments and medicines. Claim: WWF says it did not push for rhino relocation process where 11 died.
[EX A]: The World Wildlife Fund has rejected the findings of a Kenyan parliamentary inquiry that said the conservation group pushed Kenyan authorities to speed up a botched relocation of 14 rhinos last year that led to the deaths of 11 animals.

[EX Q]: Paragraph: In a declaration issued after a meeting in the Bosnian capital Sarajevo, they urged Balkan governments to halt any further construction of hydro dams. "We want everybody to see that it is bad, and it is wrong and that we are devastating our natural beauties," said Irma Popovic Dujmovic, from World Wide Fund for Nature Adria group, one of the organizers of the Sarajevo gathering. Concerns have been raised that small plants are being built for profit without any regard for the local community and local eco-systems. "Nature is losing, and local people are losing," Dujmovic said. In Bosnia alone, participants at the meeting said there are plans to build 300 dams on 244 rivers. In the region, some 2,700 hydropower plants are envisaged in the coming years. Also Thursday, EuroNatur and Riverwatch groups said in a report that small hydro power plants are putting "immense pressure" on rivers throughout Europe. In addition to the 21,387 existing hydropower plants, another 8,779 are planned, mainly in the Alps and the Balkans. According to the report, this proliferation could destroy previously untouched rivers especially in the Balkans. Anger over crystal clear rivers being turned into building sites has fueled citizens' movements throughout the Balkans. Residents of small villages have held protests and sought to bring the work to a halt. In the central Bosnian village of Merdani, residents said a small hydro plant under construction on the river Lasva has led to problems with water supplies and damaged roads. "It was a peaceful river before," said villager Mehrudin Halilovic. "I am totally against the building of this plant." Countries in the Balkans are lagging the rest of Europe in environmental standards. Many rivers in the area also are heavily polluted with waste from factories or clogged with garbage washed away from the riverbanks. Martin Skalsky, from the Czech Republic's ARNIKA group, said in Sarajevo that it is important to preserve the Balkan nature because there are not many other regions in Europe so untouched and unpopulated. "If you will build hundreds or thousands of small hydropower plants on your rivers, you can just lose everything in very few years," he said. "So, it's really dangerous." Claim: Activists warn Balkan rivers at risk from hydropower plants.
[EX A]:
Unspoiled rivers in the Balkans are facing new dangers from small hydropower plants that have sprouted up across the region in recent years, environmental experts warned Thursday.