In this task, you're given a review from Amazon. Your task is to generate a rating for the product on a scale of 1-5 based on the review. The rating means 1: extremely poor, 2: poor, 3: neutral, 4: good, 5: extremely good.
One example is below.
Q: These are junk! Both bulbs have burned out within a two month period!! I cannot believe that this company can be in business with such poor quality. I have used infrared lights for my ball python for many years now and I get a varied range of months from a bulb, but I have never gone through two bulbs in a matter of two months! I am very disappointed.
A: 1
Rationale: The user seems very disappointed in the product. Because the bulb they ordered has been burned out earlier than usual. So, he gave 1 star to the review considering it extremely poor
Q: I returned due to these factors: The earbuds. They are generically shaped and not a one size fits all or customizable. One look to the left or right and they fall out. The volume level is far less than expected from similar products I've purchased in the same price point. Lastly, the battery performance was less than I had expected. Five to six hours was a maximum on full charge for me. I will attest to the ease of connectivity, sleek and minimal design, and lightweight of this product. Probably good for some; it's worth mentioning that there is no way to secure the earbuds when they are not in use. When unsecured they dangle freely around the neck or chest. They also pick up plenty of ambient noise as they all do. I hope this helps!
A:
2