Here is the quick & dirty. None of the Gallup contracts contain a shipper out if the facilities are not placed in service by a certain date. The respective obligations of the parties do not commence until the facilities are "tested and placed in service." We notified our shippers by telephone yesterday that the facilities were in service. The compressor has since been taken down because of excessive vibration and an unusual whining noise of undetermined origin. EE&CC does not know how long it will take to correct the problems; they do not have enough information yet to even give an estimate. Based on our experience with Hubbard, it could take months to correct the problem. Today, we've been able to deliver all nominated gas simply because noms did not exceed our existing capacity. Nominations are expected to exceed existing capacity this week, in which case we will have to allocate. Given the uncertainty involved, from a PR standpoint I believe it would be best to tell the customers that because of unforeseen circumstances we are not in service after all, that we apologize for the mistake and will do our best to provide service on a daily or interruptible basis. When the compressor is actually tested and really in service, we'll let them know. The downside: we get no reservation charge at all. (estimated loss: $25,000/month) The upside: in the long run we probably save face with our customers. From a short-term economic standpoint, the better choice appears to be not to revoke our "in-service" announcement. When summer weather kicks in, we'll probably have to allocate every day. On our EBB we will have to give some reason for the allocation (or if we don't, shippers will demand an explanation anyway). Shippers' rights to a reservation refund will be triggered. The downside: shippers will never trust us again. Also, we could be subject to fraud or related causes of action for representing the compressor was "in service" when we knew it was not. The upside: on the off chance no one files a lawsuit and wins, we might at least get to keep some of the reservation charges owed us, to the extent deliveries don't fall below 75% of nominated quantities for a period of longer than 75 days in months other than July and August this summer. (In July and August, we don't get any reservation charge for amounts not delivered). We just need to keep in mind that normally the pipeline runs full in the summer months, and Gallup capacity was sold with that assumption in mind. Haven't had time to do a formal write-up; if you want me to turn this into a memo for wider distribution, let me know. For now, I think it's important to get a decision on one of the above options. The longer we wait to get information to our shippers, the bigger our customer relations problem will be.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Gallup answers
Hi Kim, I was just thinking about you. If I'm remembering correctly, you have a birthday sometime this month, is that right? Let me wish you a happy birthday (late or early)! Hope everything is going well for you. Maria, Janice, Sonya, and Sylvia still talk about how nice you are and what a great person you were to work with. I've tried to tell them how mean you are, but they just will not believe me. If this note goes through to you, write back and I'll forward your reply on to those Day Ahead ladies, they would get a kick out of hearing from you. By the way, Maria wants to know how old you are? :o) Happy B-day Kim!
Answer: You...
Here is an email: Before I leave today, I just wanted to say what a great experience it has been working in Portland over the last 15 months. I have learned so much and am amazed at what a motivated and talented team we have. I will miss all of the friendships I have made and wish everyone the best of luck and success. If you are ever in Houston, please give me a ring! Take care - Amy
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Good-Bye!
Q: Here are the notes from your four employee meetings and from the two Mark Frevert employee meetings. Call me if you have any questions or comments. Eric
Propose a subject line
A: Notes from the 6 ENW Meetings
IN: I was told to RSVP to you for the Christmas Party . My wife Ann South and Myself Steve South Will attend. I am ENA gas trading

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Christmas Party
IN: This is an email
Michael Tribolet: In response to your question, yes, Edison did file in federal district court in L.A. The filing asks the judge to force the CPUC to 1) declare that the rate free is over and 2) raise rates to compensate Edison for its undercollections. (Recall that this filing comes on the heels of the court agreeing to hear Edison's case asserting that the CPUC must let Edison pass through the power purchase costs to customers.) The filing is apparently very large. The lawyers at the CPUC have a copy but said that it's much too large to make a copy and aren't willing to give it to us to make a copy for ourselves. Question to the lawyers: Do we have contacts in L.A. that can go to the courthouse and get a copy of the filing for us? Probably a good idea to have that filing passed around to this distribution list. Best,

What is the subject?

OUT:
Edison's Filing in District Court in L.A.