In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
One example is below.
Q: Comment: Damn! Another cloudy day, and it's all Obama's doing!
A: Obscene
Rationale: This is obscenity because it hints on sexual content that is offensive to the public sense of decency.
Q: Comment: This government has never had any intention of observing the ruling of it's own Human Rights Tribunal. Just as it has never had any intention of fulfilling it's campaign promise (since repeated by the PM) of implementing UNDRIP.

To their credit, they know that what voters they lose to violating their promises on these matters, those voters will be replaced by bigoted Canadians who see abandoning indigenous children to poverty as a just act.

You can find those easily, they flaunt red herring instances of misappropriation by band leaders as justification for the government to allow children to suffer, and pat themselves on the back, their own hands competing with Red Tories and Blue Grits to acknowledge the height of bigoted cunning they have acheived.

There is one sentiment and one sentiment only vieled by their self-satisfied smirks. Put to words it is "Fuck those children, let them die.", although they'll deny it all the while that they trample upon them.
A:
Obscene