In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: I also applaud Ab. Chaput. But why call this a a progressive issue? This is the response anyone should have to racist hate. It's what any Christian, any reasonable person of any religion should have to Nazi rhetoric.
Non-obscene

Comment: Who gives a darn about the so called three founding nations. There is blatant bigotry and hypocrisy when that term "founding nations" is used as a smoke screen for racism. My family has been here for well over two hundred years. Does that give me license to discriminate against others? No! If ratepayer's referendums were the standard for zoning changes, NIMBYs would stop 90 of all development. In this case the referendum was invoked, because of local resistance (code word for racism) to the development. The referendum was used by weak politicians for cover.
Obscene

Comment: Elway and the Broncos owe the fans an apology. They knew where their weaknesses were and didn't fix them at all. For this crap, Elway gets a big new deal? Apparently he's only a great GM with Manning. And two dud QB's in a row.
Obscene