Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: If the supreme court follows the laws of the land and the Constitution, how can they possibly be divided? Incompetence or corruption? They should be unanimous in most decisions.
[A]: Yes

[Q]: You're right, it could. However, I'd still have more control as an end user.
[A]: No

[Q]: "Unaffiliated voters for the most part tossed their ballots in the trash or the recycling bin, the data show."

I don't think the data even address how voters disposed of their ballots. Perhaps they burned them or used them as birdcage liner. Perhaps they are saving them for another election day, hoping to get in the last word. Maybe Lucy Vinis was just excited to see her name in print and she autographed and framed several copies for her friends.

The tally was heavily buoyed, by the way.
[A]:
No