TASK DEFINITION: Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.
PROBLEM: CONTEXT: It's a comedy. The cakes were blatantly shaped as escape tools, but due to the guards respect of M. Gustave and the high quality of'Mendel's' cakes he so often received, the guards stupidly decide not to cut into them so as not to spoil the presentation, despite the fact that they clearly contain contraband. <sep> Q: Why does the guard not check the pastries?

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: CONTEXT: Solozzo indeed puts in place many countermeasures. First and most important, he was with Police Captain Mark McCluskey, who was on his payroll. Those days no one dared to do anything to a policeman, especially a Captain. It means bringing wrath of force and media on the whole family. Second, Micheal was checked for arms/guns or weapons while in the car sent by Solozzo. So, he was not supposed to have gun. The only man with a gun was the Captain, who was on Solozzo's side. Thirdly, Micheal was not even supposed to know where they were meeting until the end. Solozzo was confident that he could not plant a weapon or a man at the meeting place. The Corleone family got this information by paying some man from the Solozzo gang. Fourth, Micheal did not seem that harmful, as he recently joined family that to be until Don was in hospital. In fact, he was not involved in family business that time. All the above conclude that the only man who was at risk was Micheal. The countermeasures taken by Micheal for having a place with people, it works both ways. Micheal was also not supposed to be able to kill in front of people. <sep> Q: Why did Sollozzo risk it? A: the only man who was at risk was Micheal <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So why didn't Sollozzo put any counter measures for such a "Just in-case" scenario?

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: CONTEXT: Jon did not commit to murdering Daenerys when he came to the Throne room. The first thing he did was lash out at her about killing innocent civilians and prisoners of war. He had been a passive partner to Daenerys these last few episodes. He lashed out in anger because he wanted Daenerys to see reason. To snap her out of the cloud of smoke to see the rubble she had laid on ground. The next thing he does is plead to her to see reason. To give mercy to Tyrion and the rest. Daenerys at this moment is now convinced that she knows what's right for the people. The last thing he does is asks her plainly as to "what about the people who think they know what's best for them". She replies that they don't have a choice. After making every effort to redeem Daenerys in his eyes, he fails and decides to kill her. He loves her still and proclaims her the queen, now and always. Kisses her back, embrace her in his arms and stabs her in the heart. <sep> Q: Why did Jon Snow do this immoral act if he is so honorable? A: After making every effort to redeem Daenerys in his eyes, he fails and decides to kill her <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did he regret it?

SOLUTION:
No