In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
--------
Question: Comment: Actually, this money is just sitting in the Permanent Fund earnings account. No one has actually spent any of it, yet. Legislative action is needed to spend this money. So basically, Walker decreed: "I'm keeping half of your PFD ... until I can figure out how to waste it. Then I will spend it all on a bloated government that I will not cut and my pet projects."

Answer: Agree

Question: Comment: Canada's CO2 contributions are significant, especially on a per capita basis. Don't forget that we should really be factoring in emissions being exported to foreign countries like China through proposals like Kinder Morgan.

Donald Trump or no Donald Trump, the world is already well underway to a transition to an economy based on renewable energy. In the US much of the work is being done at the state level, and carbon pricing is already common in many other countries, particularly across Europe.

The challenges in Ontario have gone from poor implementation(from poor leadership) and restrictions faced through trade law. The actual big picture was the right one. A few Green MPP's would have helped.

The problem with Trudeau's plan is the proposed carbon tax(for provinces without carbon pricing) is too low, and you can't be serious about reducing emissions while simultaneously building pipelines. He's trying to please everyone at the same time. This makes for ineffective climate policy.

Answer: Disagree

Question: Comment: Free speech can come with a cost to those who choose to speak freely and without thought of the possible consequences of such speech. We are asked here to ensure our speech is CIVIL. When it is not considered CIVIL it is removed. Using ones Facebook page for a platform to make racist comments can lead to consequences far greater than just having such comments removed. This young girl has lost the trust of many and has positioned herself undesirably to many of us regardless of the official outcome of all of this. She is now just a reminder of what Canada might become in the future. I suspect that is not what many of us want.

Answer:
Agree