Question: Sentence A: Congressional debate has focused on two of our criteria, mission relevancy and gains through consolidation.

Sentence B: The debate has focused on few of our criteria, two in particular.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Doing a good case study is more than just looking at what is happening in a few instances.
A case study that only involves a few instances is not a good one.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
and you know he's like well i get more exercise pushing it around

Here is a hypothesis:
He uses a cart to push it around instead of lifting it himself.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: As the Democratic National Committee sinks deeper into scandal-related debt, the Democrats can look forward to running without a functional party organization to support them.

Sentence 2: Whether or not the Democrats have the support of a functional party organization has ultimately no effect on whether or not their campaign will be successful.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Wouldn't you do anything to help another girl? cried Tommy.

Does it follow that "Tommy asked if they would help another girl."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Quite right, monsieur. ", can we conclude that "I disagree with that."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no