Question: Sentence A: yeah it's got no

Sentence B: Yes, it has got.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: has discussed indicting the president for obstruction while he is still in office, but holding off on the trial until he is a private citizen, when a conviction would be easier to obtain.
It has been talked about to indict the president but it is being held back.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
They didn't starve, but they didn't thrive, either.

Here is a hypothesis:
They thrived and had an abundance of everything.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: You live that far from the city?

Sentence 2: Do you live in the city?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
SO2 and NOx contribute to acid deposition, which damages lakes and streams, adversely affecting the fish and other species that live in them, and leaches nutrients from the soil.

Does it follow that "SO2 is more dangerous to lakes than NOx is."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "that type of thing um uh", can we conclude that "Things like that."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes