Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
OK. But I calls 'em as I sees 'em, and I gave three examples supporting my conclusion. Could have provided several more (as I mentioned). But I don't expect everyone to agree with me on every point.

My main goal is to expose--and STOP--the arrogant, irresponsible "animal welfare" simpletons who value PET lives over environmental stability, species-level wildlife extinctions and indeed the lives of their fellow human beings.

As for the rabbits, I must respectfully decline, despite the fact my one remaining cat would probably really enjoy their company. My daughter loves rabbits and raised them for years when she was younger, but no longer has the time or energy to care for one dealing with three kids (ages 16, 4 and 2).

As for me, was difficult enough to get my land-person to accept renters with a cat, and even more difficult to get her to agree to a second one--a "rescue" I brought home from Sand Pt in 2004. But thanks anyway.

Ex Output:
No

Ex Input:
sadly, no.

Ex Output:
No

Ex Input:
I can see why comments taper off when you two guys appear with you comments. Neither of you has the remotest idea what you are talking about. Those damns are a spit in the ocean in terms of the electricity they generate. They were build to electrify the Rogue Valley in the early 20th century and have long outlived their usefulness. As the editorial writer says, the region is awash in surplus hydro from the Columbia River damns since the aluminum industry closed down. The region's utilities has been closing nuclear and fossil fuel plants because they are necessary. Do a bit of homework guys, before shooting off...your comments. You won't sound so foolish.

Ex Output:
Yes