Teacher:In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: De Santamaria v. United States Att'y Gen., 525 F.3d 999, 1008-10 (11th Cir.2008) (finding persecution where alien received numerous death threats, was dragged by her hair out of her vehicle, and was later kidnapped and beaten); Delgado v. United States Att'y Gen., 487 F.3d 855, 859-61 (11th Cir.2007) (per curiam) (finding persecution based on cumulative effect of two beatings, continued threatening phone calls, and two instances of the alien's car being vandalized with political graffiti); Niftaliev v. United States Att'y Gen., 504 F.3d 1211 (11th Cir.2007) (finding that the cumulative effect of numerous beatings, arrests, searches, and interrogations, culminating in a fifteen-day, food-deprived detention compelled a finding of past persecution). Notwithstanding the (8th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>); Dandan v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 567, 573-74 (7th
Holding statements: (A) holding that harassment threats and one beating did not constitute persecution (B) holding that two beatings which were four years apart lasted only a few hours each and did not result in serious injury did not constitute persecution (C) holding that court was not compelled to find past persecution or a wellfounded fear of persecution where the petitioner was arrested detained for four hours and experienced some physical mistreatment (D) holding that a chiropractor was not in custody for miranda purposes despite an ensuing interview which lasted nearly seven hours (E) holding that two arrests and repeated beatings constituted persecution
Student:
holding that harassment threats and one beating did not constitute persecution