Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

Right, and we submit the Framers had something very different in mind than the rule against perpetuities. The point is, if this is permitted, then there is no limit to the ability to extend terms, and that is precisely contrary to what the Framers had in mind when they worried about this problem originally. What was the problem they were solving? It was, as this Court stated in Graham --

Pick from:
* Yes
* It's impossible to say
* No
Hypothesis: The framers were not concerned with the limits on extensions.
No