This is the content of an email: Suzanne: Can you find out when Madonna will be in Philly? We will be there from 6/30 through 7/4 and I was hoping that she would be there at that time. Can you check for her dates in NY or DC as well? Thanks.

Subject: Concert

This is the content of an email: Update Jerry and I went to East Texas this weekend. we withdrew $750.00 from the Fredonia bank and I'm going to deposit that in the Credit Union. I also took the petty funds in the kitchen drawer - $72.00. AND we did get $2,000.00 deposited into Dad's account from the Credit Union. later dudes

Subject: Yo

This is the content of an email: I read Wednesday's NGPL order (RP00-18-002) as applying only to NGPL due to their unique restrictions and tariff rules. I do not read it as forcing the rest of the industry (i.e., us) to use the floor rate as the reserve price for negotiated index rate bids and ordinary recourse rate bids. I think we can still determine the reserve price on a prearranged deal like the ENA deal based on our good faith valuation of the upside provided by the index mechanism. I.e., on that type of deal, we can determine that the index mechanism is worth "x cents" to us and require a discounted recourse rate bidder to bid more than the floor plus x cents to win. Agreed? Note that NGPL whined that the unique rules they are subject to place them at a competitve disadvantage to the rest of the industry (i.e., us) on this issue. The commission didn't say anything about that, implying to me that the rest of us are still free to do what NGPL cannot do. DF

Subject: ENA Deal

This is the content of an email: Janet, if you are ok, I'm ok - we usually only sign these type of non-solicitations, stand-stills or non-competes if we are well down the road towards having a reasonable probability to completing a transaction with the counterparty. Otherwise, it becomes a nightmare to manage all these. I will leave it to your discretion. Regards
Subject: Approval of a Non-Solicitation Provision