Sentence 1: To that I attribute the circumstance that you have omitted one fact of paramount importance."

Sentence 2: You must be right since you looked at all the facts.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
(You can buy a combination ticket for the railway and the aquarium. )

Does it follow that "Tickets for the railway and the aquarium must be purchased individually. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If The jury found Moore guilty of violating the Unlawful Detainer Assistance Act and of practicing law without a license and acting with fraud, malice, or oppression., can we say that "Moore was found guilty by the jury."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"Built by the hugely wealthy land-owning family of Raja Majendra Mullick Bahadur, this huge Palladian villa-turned-museum has a park and menagerie of exotic birds."
Hypothesis: The park was made by accident after birds started flocking there.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: that should be automatic death penalty no if ands or buts If this premise is true, does that tell us:"This crime should be punishable by death under any circumstances."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Q: If yeah well i was cooking me a grilled cheese, can we say that "I like to eat grilled cheese with tomato soup."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
it is not possible to tell