Question:
Based on the premise "1999: Turnout for Apocalypse Lighter Than Expected", can we conclude that "Many more people showed up for the Apocalypse than expected."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: The country is a veritable compendium of geography.

Sentence B: The country's geography is starkly different throughout.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: The Eremo Observatory halfway up the mountain has been studying eruptions since 1845 and has an impressive display of relief plans, seismographs, and geological specimens spewed out of the volcano.
The Eremo Observatory has been studying cooking since 1821.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
are you in Texas oh i'm in uh down here in Sherman or Denison rather

Here is a hypothesis:
Are you near the Canadian border?

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: The case against the president should be strong enough to justify some members of his own party voting against him.

Sentence 2: Members of the president's own party need no justification to vote against him.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
""Sounds as if it might be important,"Drew commented."
Hypothesis: Drew said that it could be important.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes