Problem: Wal-Mart Stores has asked a US federal appeals court to review a judge's order approving class-action status for a sex-discrimination lawsuit.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Wal-Mart Stores speaks through lawyers."?

A: Yes

Problem: Brian's Baseball<br>Brian had a baseball he loved to play with. He'd throw it against the garage wall, and catch it again. Once, he threw it too hard, and it bounced away down the road. He chased it down the street and around the corner, until he found it. He took it back home, and decided to play tetherball instead.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Brian has at least two balls"?

A: Yes

Problem: What I've done is, it says that there's no extraneous unpublished material questioning. That's the clarity that I need. And then, quite frankly, my mindset is, if the issue of the defendants is that we were biased in our reporting because we either misquoted somebody or whatever, well, this isn't a jury trial.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "There are about 5 defendants in this case."?

A:
It's impossible to say