In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: Other topics from the list. Choices: 1. The list of topics was a mile long. 2. There were more topics than those that were mentioned. 3. There was nothing else to see on the list.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: With the right colors, metals and bits of jewels--as well as more secret symbols--we can simulate the planets. Choices: 1. We will be able to simulate the planets. 2. The pieces we need are easy to find. 3. We only need one kind of object.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: Said Ken Bode ( Washington Week in Review ): We're going to skip [this week on WWIR ] the possibility of Monica Lewinsky testifying at Linda Tripp's trial and--blah, blah, blah--for this week, and I think our viewers probably will be happy to hear that we are going to skip it. Choices: 1. Viewers were happy about it being skipped. 2. Linda Tripp is testifying this week. 3. Ken Bode made WWIR skip Monica Lewinsky's testification.
[EX A]:
3