Q: Dan says, Cutter in acting as "Representative" for Harley, would receive payments from Enron. With regards to deals, deals with Harley at different prices is ok. Concerning FM, Harley could claim FM for delivery to the meter. Hope this helps. If not, please discuss further with Dan.
Propose a subject line
A: Cutter

Q: Please begin sending the Phillips Petroleum statements to me at the following e-mail address (jahartn@ppco.com). Jennifer Littau is no longer the accountant handling these properties. Jennifer has forwarded the November statements to me, but I would appreciate your sending them to me directly in January. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Thank you for your assistance.
Propose a subject line
A: November Statements

Q: To All: Today we funded the sale of the Haina Note. Enron Caribe Ltd. received approximately $14.5 million. Brian Zatarain, Coralina Rivera, and Darleene McKeever were instrumental in getting the transaction documented, approved, and funded in a very short timeframe. Dan
Propose a subject line
A: Haina Note

Q: Per our discussion this morning, below is a summary of items to discuss with Glynn: Adding Enron's "negative CTC claim" to the list of claims: PGE's filing included a list of top twenty creditors. Our negative CTC claim was apparently not taken into account in compiling that list. The list is nonbinding, however. PG&E will be required to file schedules of creditors on April 20. Our negative CTC claim should be on Schedule F (for unsecured claims). You may want to remind Glynn of your previous conversations and state our expectation that the negative CTC claim will appear (preferably as uncontested) in the April 20 filing. (Note: if PG&E does not include the claim we have an opportunity to file a proof of claim and ultimately the court determines the validity of the claim). Including Enron on the Creditors' Committee: PG&E may have the opportunity to influence representation on the creditors' committees. There are several reasons to suggest to Glynn that we be included: 1) we are a big creditor, 2) we could be helpful in crafting a broader solution, and 3) we are one of the real parties in interest behind the PX and ISO (who were listed as significant creditors but are really just "passthroughs" for the suppliers ... and PG&E likely would not want to have those political bodies serving on the creditors committee anyway).
Propose a subject line
A:
Call to Bob Glynn