In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. The four incorrect answers are other holding statements. You should find the correct option. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Q: Judge. The State challenges the trial court's order dismissing an information against Larry Daniel Jones on the basis of double jeopardy. Because the Florida charge is not barred under the dual sovereign exception to double jeopardy, we reverse. Jones was charged with interference with child cust L.Ed.2d 641 (1985). Jones argues that Booth is inapplicable because it involved a federal-state context instead of a state-to-state situation. We find no basis for this distinction. See State v. McNab, 642 So.2d 41 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (<HOLDING>). As Jones notes in his brief, a number of
Holding statements: (A) holding the same for malicious prosecution (B) holding that malicious prosecution claim accrues when underlying prosecution is terminated (C) holding that a judgment in a criminal prosecution for dwi did not bar a subsequent civil proceeding founded on the same facts (D) holding that states nonproseeution agreement did not bar subsequent federal prosecution (E) holding that foreign states prosecution did not bar subsequent florida prosecution for same conduct
A:
(E)