Here is an email: I changed the Oct 2000 volume on deal 203062 (tagg NA1167.8) from 95244 dth to 95246 dth. Please make the following change: Deal 203030 (NA1137.4) change the volume for April from 50,857 dth to 13,527 dth, and change the volume for May from 17,866 dth to 4,752 dth. Please verify the following info; The confirm for deal 169036 (NA0713.1) shows a price of $2.295 + $.6800, according to CES this should be a price of $2.795 + $.6800. Please verify which price is correct. The confirm for deal 168997 (NA0713.4) shows a basis price of $.455 for April and CES is showing $.175. Please verify which price is correct.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: CES Confirms
Q: Brian, Mark forward the executed docs. to me. The Trailblazer Assignment was not included. I have attached the assignment in case you don't have the one I forwarded earlier. Please execute and return. Also the Amended and Restated Transaction No. 2 was initialled, but was not executed. I am forwarding those back to you for execution. Thanks for your cooperation.
Propose a subject line
A: Trailblazer Assignment
IN: Based on recent discussions with several energy firms, there appears to be interest in conducting a survey which * summarizes the current state of risk management best practices within the industry, and * provides benchmark data addressing current levels of risk based performance for various energy related lines of business To respond to this interest, we would like to conduct a survey which addresses these goals. We have prepared a proposal which outlines our approach for conducting a survey, and provides samples of expected output. I will be in touch sometime next week to discuss the proposal with you, and determine your interest in participating. I look forward to speaking with you, and potentially working with you as a participant in this project. <<Benchmark_Sales_Presentation_v2.ppt>> Thank You

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Risk Management benchmarking survey
IN: This is an email
Mr. Finzi, We have heard back from you regarding the Confidentiality Agreement referenced below. Can you please let me know when we might expect your comments? Thank you.

What is the subject?

OUT: Instinet Corporation Confidentiality Agreement
QUESTION: Here is the latest draft of the filing for transport options. Significant changes include: - added definition of Counterparty - added captions and reorganized the filing to more clearly reflect compliance with 154.202 - included an explanation of how the option fee will be part of a negotiated rate - added an example of how options will work I think we need to decide whether we are better off with the type of option fee explanation I have in this draft, or whether we should instead state the fee will be market based, and include an explanation that, pursuant to the Commission's discussion in Order 637, market based rates are appropriate because we are going to commit to an open season process that will be nondiscriminatory and that will ensure we aren't withholding capacity from the market. Can we have a conference call to discuss your comments this week? I will have Janet call to determine your availability.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: TW Options
IN: Glenn Schleede, a friend from the early nineties NPC study, provided the attached commentary on the "Generosity of Californians". I don't whether he sent this to the industry press or just friends. If anyone is interested, I have the detailed backup.

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
"The Generosity of Californians", authored by Glenn Schleede, retired VP of NEES and industry gadfly