Problem: Here is a premise:
The main beneficiary of any subsidy for real estate is the person who owns the property at the time the subsidy is instituted, not the future buyer.

Here is a hypothesis:
The future buyer can't be the beneficiary because it would make buying impossible.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: The methodological meaning is important in understanding what differentiates a case study from a noncase study and a good case study from a not-so-good case study.

Sentence 2: One must understand a case from a noncase as well as the quality of a good case from a bad case.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
It was as good as he'd said it was--and completely damning to all of his theories and hopes.

Does it follow that "It was very dooming to all of the theories and hopes of him."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If Put me wise, he said succinctly., can we say that "Consider me wise."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"In one of these approaches, users were asked to answer specific questions identified as areas where APHIS most needed comments, the answers to the questions were entered into a database with a web interface, and commenters were allowed to review all the electronic comments posted and to post other comments to the site."
Hypothesis: Users were asked to enter their personal information, including credit card numbers and social security information.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: He wanted a sound bite--something pithy to take out of context.

Sentence 2: A sound bite integral to the narrative is what he wanted.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell