Context:
Well, there's a law pending called the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. I strongly support it. What it says is that gays and lesbians can't be fired from their job because they're gay or lesbian. And it would be a federal law preventing that. Now, I wonder if the -- it's been blocked by the opponents in the majority in the Congress. I wonder if the Governor who lend his support to that law.
Hypothesis: The Employment Non-Discrimination Act has to be supported by the government.
It's impossible to say
Context:
Gadget & the Gadgetinis is a CanadianFrench-Italian TV series spin-off of the 1983 series "Inspector Gadget", developed by DiC Entertainment in cooperation with Haim Saban's SIP Animation and released 20012003. There are 52 episodes. "Gadget & the Gadgetinis" is today the property of DHX Media, which holds the rights to most of DiC's library.
Hypothesis: Gadget & the Gadgetinis is not a spin-off
No
Context:
Why wouldn't it? If the equity argument under the Necessary and Proper Clause justifies extension of the copyright for those whose copyright will expire tomorrow if it's not extended, in order to put them on parity with those getting copyrights for new works, why doesn't it apply to the copyright, the holder of the copyright that expired yesterday?
Hypothesis: The equifax argument is under the Necessary and Proper Clause.
It's impossible to say