Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: Flour is a thickening agent, plain and simple. However adding it without cooking it first can lead to your dish having a raw flour taste, and you can get blobs of flour in it, so I would ignore the recipes which say coat with flour without cooking it first, or use cornstarch (cornflour) instead. Alternatively you can make a roux with flour in a separate pan and add it in later. This is simply mixing equal weights of flour and butter and cooking it in a frying pan until it has the color you want. A lighter roux will add a paler color and a milder flavor, a darker roux adds a deeper color and richer flavor. <sep> Q: Have you ever made a ragout? A: Alternatively you can make a roux Q: Do I have to roll the meat in flour when I make a ragout? A: can lead to your dish having a raw flour taste, and you can get blobs of flour in it Q: Should I add anything extra to my meat if I'm going to leave the flour off of it? A: I would ignore the recipes which say coat with flour without cooking it first, or use cornstarch (cornflour) instead <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Would the meat be more moist if I did roll it in flour first?

Output: No

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: Yes, you can roast the beans some more. However the results will probably not be great. Roasting results in quite a bit of smoke. If you are going low tech, I would do it in a wok in a very well ventilated area. It's pretty easy to set off smoke detectors. A stove top with a range hood might be good enough if you have a particularly good range hood. Outside with the wok on a BBQ is probably best.Roast over a low heat and stir continuously. You want to get the beans as even as possible, trying not to burn them. The beans will continue to roast after taking them off the heat. So stop one or two roast levels before the desired colour and tip your beans out into a colander and continue stirring to cool. The residual heat will cook the bean some more. To aim for a desired roast level, compare the current roast colour to your desired roast colour and maybe to a roast level chart. Google image search "coffee roast level chart". Guesstimate the roast level that is one or two levels below your desired colour to stop at.Once again there will be a lot of smoke. <sep> Q: How to improve the taste of sour coffee beans? A: you can roast the beans some more. However the results will probably not be great Q: Why will the results not be great? A: Roasting results in quite a bit of smoke Q: Is a range hood good enough to deal with this? A: A stove top with a range hood might be good enough if you have a particularly good range hood Q: Is there another way you would suggest? A: Outside with the wok on a BBQ is probably best Q: How high of heat? A: Roast over a low heat and stir continuously <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How long?

Output: Yes

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: Yes, you can entirely replace water with milk. The main thing to be aware of is how prone it is to boiling over. Milk will eagerly do that on its own, and starchy water will too, so the combination has to be cooked on very low heat to avoid making a huge mess. (I think this is why the original recipe starts with water: less time with potential for boiling over, and more stable temperature when you add the milk.) You'll also probably want to be more careful about stirring the first time; if the heat is a little higher than you realize, you will start accumulating a layer on the bottom of the pan.If you want them to cook faster and have less potential boiling over to worry about, you can always presoak in milk beforehand. I've done this overnight in the fridge, which was enough to let me make (admittedly slightly chewy) steel-cut oats in the microwave the next morning. <sep> Q: Steel Cut Oats: cooking in milk vs. water###Most of the recipes I've seen (including Good Eats) recommend simmering the oats in 4 cups of liquid for 1 cup of oats. Alton Brown recommends 3 cups of water for ~25 mins and then (1/2 cup of milk + 1/2 cup of buttermilk) for ~10 mins.###However, I would like to do away with water entirely (just curious). Could I just simmer 1 cup of oats in 4 cups of milk for ~40mins? A: you can entirely replace water with milk. The main thing to be aware of is how prone it is to boiling over. Milk will eagerly do that on its own Q: is the first ~25mins of simmering in water designed to maximize water absorption? A: the combination has to be cooked on very low heat to avoid making a huge mess. (I think this is why the original recipe starts with water: less time with potential for boiling over Q: Also, if anyone has cooked oats mostly in milk before, I'd like to hear their opinion as well###Thank you A: If you want them to cook faster and have less potential boiling over to worry about, you can always presoak in milk beforehand Q: That sounds helpful. Thanks for the tip A: I've done this overnight in the fridge, which was enough to let me make (admittedly slightly chewy) steel-cut oats in the microwave the next morning Q: Okay. Anything else that I should know A: You'll also probably want to be more careful about stirring the first time; if the heat is a little higher than you realize, you will start accumulating a layer on the bottom of the pan <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: okay. Thank you!###Appreciate it
Output: Yes