Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Doubtful ak45. The notion of shooting a hand, foot, gun is bogus Hollywood BS that much of the public can't seem to let go of. Its very common in these melees that shots go wild. Glad no innocents were hurt and the bad guy captured. Amazes me that a suspect takes a bad situation and makes it exponentially worse. But maybe that's how their poor thinking skills got them there in the first place.
Example Output: No

Example Input: "The criminal justice system should be reserved for the real wrong-doers, he says, with treatment for people with behavioral and mental and health problems and shelter for homeless youth offering better options at a lower cost in the long run than jail."

Think I will move to the district so I can vote for Farr.
Example Output: No

Example Input: cities aren't meant to be in the housing business in the first place, that's a market function. subsidized housing in this country for most part has been an abysmal failure so any notion that the city (or any city) is responsible for being some kind of economic referee is out of touch. im just tired of bums and derelicts trashing every viable bit of public open space in this city. if ted wheeler can prove he's not an insufferable pussy and either toss those rejects to the curb or let the police actually do their jobs properly, then he'll get my vote. otherwise get off my lawn....
Example Output:
Yes