In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: I am sure Bush was sexually aroused by touching her. After all, he was only 90 at the time. He most likely wanted to grab her by the boobs, but he couldn't stand to do that so he did the next best thing and grabbed her by the butt. Dirty old man.

Answer: Sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: Yes it is.
There are only two sexes.
Male and Female
A boy may feel he is a girl, but that peepee between his legs denotes his sex.
Anything is is just bad wiring. Sorry, but that's the truth.

Answer: Sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: You're right, Marcus. There isn't one single good idea anywhere. Better to clench your butt, squeeze your eyes shut tight and just hope. That oughtta "build a denser city with more places to live". Yup, give up on any idea of a liveable city. We don't need parkland. We don't need the traffic lanes and bike lanes that the builders block for months or years at a time with their cranes and trucks. Etc.

Just let business do their thing.

And by the way, the OMB only protects business interests. Why shouldn't a city be able to implement a strategy for, again, "building a denser city with more places to live"? But on a scale and in a manner that the people, as represented by the gov't they elect, want? You know, democratically...

Answer:
Sexual-explicit