In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: You can't culturally appropriate fictional cultures because they don't exist. Your example misses the point.

Output: Non-obscene

Input: Consider Input: Comment: This is a former drama teacher who can hardly get through two sentences without stammering. I think you might be overestimating his abilities.

Output: Non-obscene

Input: Consider Input: Comment: I generally track conservative (as they're the only mainstream party that at least talks about the only political issues important to me - small gov't, getting it out of our lives) but don't think of myself as especially partisan. Still, this strikes me as an odd story. This is politics, not a tea-party (no pun intended). Since when does policy disagreement amount to all those ugly "isms" ascribed to Vaughan - even if he did raise his voice.
Output: Non-obscene