input question: Against the wall is the Wheel of Law that originally roseabove the lions. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The Wheel of Law rose over the lions in the past."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "We do this not out of philanthropy but out of enlightened self-interest.", can we conclude that "Philanthropy is great, but it isn't the reason why we do it."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: A while ago we changed the internet-phone PBX system to comply with WebTel 4.0.5, because, you know, no sane person would stay with the ancient Web 3.0.'

Sentence B: We knew no one wanted the Web 3.0 system because the graphics were terrible.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Original paintings from local and guest artists, ceramics, and a collection of imported crafts make it a good place to find a souvenir of high quality.
This is not a good place to find souvenirs, try a few towns over.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
What's more, the white-black marriage rate lags significantly behind rates of white intermarriage with other, nonblack races.

Here is a hypothesis:
The percentage of black and white interracial couples is more than those of whites with other races.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
yeah how about how about uh long term do you have anything uh for as far as as far as savings go for long term

Does it follow that "Do you have anything saved for the long term?"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes