Problem: BODY: Here are all of the deal numbers that correspond with today's tie point, Cal PX, and Cal Imbalance deals. I erased the EOL transaction numbers on the first four, but I believe they were going in a sequence beginning at 627. Thanks so much for your help on this. 458259 458260 64 65 66 Tie Points 67 69 70 458271 72 PX 73 458276 58 Imbalance
======
A: SUBJECT: Cal PX Bridge

Problem: BODY: if things are they seem, you will soon be getting poked in the a-hole by some lifer in the pen. good job! ps i had invested in enron and lost 100% of that money...funny that you were selling all your stock at the time...hey maybe i was buying yours... hope you like the feeling of stealing money from people like me...
======
A: SUBJECT: you suck

Problem: BODY: I have a concern about Enron's forward-looking exposure associated with legacy deals (deals that existed during the June 2000 through the May 2001 price shock). If Edison gets its way, all customers will pay for Edison's under-recovery from June 2000 through January 2001 plus CDWR spot market purchases during 2001. This would take the form of a surcharge on future bills. My concern is that Enron will be on the hook for these future charges associated with past under-collections -- even beyond the term of our legacy deals. For example, if a deal ends in March 2002 we could be on the hook for surcharges that a legacy customer would receive on its bill after that date, provided the surcharge pertained to costs incurred by the utility during the time that the legacy customer was ours.
======
A:
SUBJECT: Another Version of Negative CTC Risk?