What is the subject line for this email?

Hey guys. Let's try this. Take the data from 2000 and change the following. Take Keystone West volumes to 850,000/d rateably, then add the new gen numbers posted below. You will need to add this demand to the EOC S ML demand numbers (Is Salmayuca included in this number?). We should use the 2000 waha west volumes for now. You should end up with reduced ehrenberg volumes for the reduction in Keystone west volumes and the addition of New Gen demand. Run the storage balance at 2000 Socal in this scenario. We will then plug forward with waha west volumes to balance Socal in 2001. Also, add columns to adjust (90%, 60%, 50%, etc) the burns for new gen in SW. We should then look to adjusting socal demand down for the high hydro/increased NW imports to CA scenario that could happen. Use the SP-15 2000 gen numbers and then back out the avg of 1999 and 2000 power imports. I would like to avoid averaging 1999 and 2000 socal gas demand. Use a 10,000 heat rate to reduce gas demand. Have Jay adjust EOC demand for normal weather. We may have to refer to the load sensitivity data from west power to reduce the SW electric loads and then back out of gen numbers using a 10,000 heat rate. We will then be exposed to EPNG and the OPS increasing Keystone west volumes between now and next summer - run the 2001 with this possibility as well. Take Key West to 1.1 bcf. Let me know where my errors in approach may be. This should give us a picture of the Socal deliverability for 2001. Thanks,

Subject Line:
APR-OCT Analysis