input question: Here it is easy to see why this city is also known as Lalitpur (Beautiful City). If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Here it is easy to see why this city is also known as Lalitpur because of the panoramic views. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "While most infrastructure spending takes place at the state, local, or private-sector level, the federal government also invests in infrastructure such as highways, bridges, and air traffic control.", can we conclude that "Federal government infrastructure spending is considered more valuable to the public."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: The majority of Funchal's shops are nostalgically small and personal.

Sentence B: Some of Funchal's shops are enormous and impersonal.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Also, most discussion of the decline in personal saving focuses on the adequacy of individuals' retirement saving rather than on the significance of personal saving for the economy as a whole.
Most discussion of the decline in personal saving focuses on the adequacy of individuals' retirement
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
The back jacket is crammed with bipartisan blurbs--from Jack Kemp to Vernon Jordan, Dianne Feinstein, and Ann McLaughlin, George Bush's secretary of labor.

Here is a hypothesis:
Ann McLaughin served under George Bush as a bipartisan secretary.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Even if there were no growth in the US steel production and imports from 2000 out to 2020, the amount of steel needed to complete the retrofits for the Clear Skies Act would still be less than one tenth of one percent of US production including imports.

Does it follow that "If there was more growth in the U.S. steel production, the amount of steel needed may increase beyond what is strictly necessary."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell