Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: As shown throughout the film, the Predator has only killed armed opponents. At this point in the film Arnold has put up a great fight against the Predator and is currently unarmed. The Predator looks him over much like a hunter might take time looking at a prize kill before firing a shot. The Predator disarms himself and then fights Arnold hand-to-hand, a "fair" fight instead of just killing defenseless prey. (It's been a long time since I've seen the film, so can't remember exactly when/how the Predator stops using weapons). <sep> Q: Why did the Predator not kill Arnold immediately as it killed everybody else? A: As shown throughout the film, the Predator has only killed armed opponents. At this point in the film Arnold has put up a great fight against the Predator and is currently unarmed <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why did Arnold not have any weapon at that point?

Output: No

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: Because his father taught him not to involve in any (true loving) relationship in their line of work. Nicky knew they both fell truly for each other, so he decide to leave her for the sake of both of them. At the end scene, his father can be seen saying these things, and because of that mistake (losing focus) he took all his earned/stolen money. <sep> Q: Why did Nicky do what he did to Jess in New Orleans? A: Nicky knew they both fell truly for each other, so he decide to leave her for the sake of both of them Q: I still don't understand why he would do that? A: Because his father taught him not to involve in any (true loving) relationship in their line of work Q: Why did his father get involved? A: At the end scene, his father can be seen saying these things, and because of that mistake (losing focus) he took all his earned/stolen money <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Oh, so they were involved in something illegal?

Output: Yes

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT: Given he's both a playboy billionaire, and previous movies have shown he manufactured his suits himself, I'd say it's safe to assume he fabricated them using his own resources. He came out to the public as Iron Man at the end of the first film, so he doesn't really need to be completely covert when it comes to building these things, and can easily afford his own facilities to handle the job. Given he's also a genius at robotics, it shouldn't be hard for him to build a facility to fabricate his suits using next to no human interaction as well. I believe during the first movie you see him issuing commands to Jarvis about how to paint the updated suit, after he asks Jarvis how close it is to being fully built. <sep> Q: How did Tony Stark get his new suits? A: previous movies have shown he manufactured his suits himself, I'd say it's safe to assume he fabricated them using his own resources <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What else can you tell me about Iron Man?
Output: Yes