Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Women with red-hair wearing a blue nike shirt."
Hypothesis: "Red haired woman wearing blue shirt and white pants."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: It is not mandatory for red haired women to wear blue shirt with white pants.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "Bearded man playing an acoustic guitar."
Hypothesis: "A bearded man is rocking out on an acoustic guitar."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Rocking out on an acoustic guitar is a rephrasing of playing an acoustic guitar.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Mountain biker biking besides a lake." can we conclude that "The lake has a ncie trail for biking."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The fact that there's a mountain biker biking besides a lake doesn't necessarily mean that the lake has a nice trail for biking.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "Man in red hat holds up one finger while pointing at a sign with the number one on it."
Hypothesis: "A man is giving directions."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Pointing at a sign does not automatically mean that one is giving directions.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A couple standing under a sign." can we conclude that "A coupel watching each other."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Standing under a sign does not mean they are watching each other.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Dirt bikers traverse a series of jumps." is it true that "Some dirt bikers are falling off their bike."?

Let's solve it slowly:
Just because Dirt bikers traverse a series of jumps does not mean they are falling off.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.