In this task, you are given the abstract of a research paper. Your task is to generate a summary of this abstract. Your summary should not be very short, but it's better if it's not more than 30 words.

[Q]: Reinforcement learning in multi-agent scenarios is important for real-world applications but presents challenges beyond those seen in single-agent settings. We present an actor-critic algorithm that trains decentralized policies in multi-agent settings, using centrally computed critics that share an attention mechanism which selects relevant information for each agent at every timestep. This attention mechanism enables more effective and scalable learning in complex multi-agent environments, when compared to recent approaches. Our approach is applicable not only to cooperative settings with shared rewards, but also individualized reward settings, including adversarial settings, and it makes no assumptions about the action spaces of the agents. As such, it is flexible enough to be applied to most multi-agent learning problems
[A]: We propose an approach to learn decentralized policies in multi-agent settings using attention-based critics and demonstrate promising results in environments with complex interactions.

[Q]: This work provides theoretical and empirical evidence that invariance-inducing regularizers can increase predictive accuracy for worst-case spatial transformations (spatial robustness). Evaluated on these adversarially transformed examples, we demonstrate that adding regularization on top of standard or adversarial training reduces the relative error by 20% for CIFAR10 without increasing the computational cost. This outperforms handcrafted networks that were explicitly designed to be spatial-equivariant. Furthermore, we observe for SVHN, known to have inherent variance in orientation, that robust training also improves standard accuracy on the test set.
[A]: for spatial transformations robust minimizer also minimizes standard accuracy; invariance-inducing regularization leads to better robustness than specialized architectures

[Q]: Meta-learning will be crucial to creating lifelong, generalizable AI. In practice, however, it is hard to define the meta-training task distribution that is used to train meta-learners. If made too small, tasks are too similar for a model to meaningfully generalize. If made too large, generalization becomes incredibly difficult. We argue that both problems can be alleviated by introducing a teacher model that controls the sequence of tasks that a meta-learner is trained on. This teacher model is incentivized to start the student meta-learner on simple tasks then adaptively increase task difficulty in response to student progress. While this approach has been previously studied in curriculum generation, our main contribution is in extending it to meta-learning.
[A]:
Teacher that trains meta-learners like humans