Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: "To find a better health-care model, we don't have to turn our gaze north, in the usual direction, to Canada, or across the pond to the UK and other European countries, or even limit ourselves to calling for "Medicare for all." Eight million of us already have something better than Medicare and more akin to the UK's National Health Service, right here, in Americawith the private-insurance industry almost completely eliminated from the equation. The real question we need to ask was posed just last month by an obviously impressed UK physician, during an NHS study visit to the VHA in West Haven: "Why," he wondered out loud, "do you have to be a veteran to get this level of care in America? Why isn't it available to all Americans?" Why indeed. "

http://prospect.org/article/why-veterans-health-system-better-you-think
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: "We really wanted the community to be involved in it and to have the opportunity to hear the candidates." ... if they pay the $5 fee, of course, which will fund the campaigns of the liberal candidates supported by the League of Women Voters.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: re: Dirksen - You prefer his "careful" approach? You mean his climate denying? His unwillingness to take a more forthright approach to our region dealing with climate change? To move forward on alternative transportation options? And I suppose this means you want careful movement on urban growth and other Metro-related issues; golly, we can't move too fast, gotta be careful. Don't want to act as soon as possible on these issues.

Rosenthal is a scientist and someone who has worked with government enough to know how to move forward in a strong, productive manner. Metro could really use him. But you prefer someone who is "careful" while demanding other offices be filled by the kind of bold leadership you reject in this race?
[EX A]:
No