Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

Washington (CNN) -- The federal government said it will recommend that new cars have rear-view video systems, a move immediately denounced as "insufficient" by safety groups who say the cameras should be mandatory.

The camera and monitor system enables drivers to see whether people or objects are in the blind spot behind vehicles.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said Tuesday it will add the rear-view video systems to its list of recommended features under its New Car Assessment Program, designed to encourage car manufacturers to improve vehicle safety.

But safety groups called the action a stalling tactic, saying the agency is dragging its feet in fulfilling a congressionally imposed deadline to issue a rule on rear visibility.

Passed in 2008, the law had a 2011 deadline. The regulation is now two and a half years overdue.

Death toll from backover accidents grows

The NHTSA action "is an inadequate substitute for issuing a mandatory safety regulation," Jackie Gillan, president of Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, said in a statement. "In fact, safety advocates are concerned that NHTSA's announcement is an attempt to divert attention from their failure to act."

The NHTSA announcement Tuesday came just one day before a group of safety advocates, including two parents who unintentionally hit their children while backing up, was expected to file suit against the U.S. Department of Transportation, which includes NHTSA.

The suit is to be filed Wednesday morning by Greg Gulbransen, who reportedly backed over his 2-year-old son, Cameron, in his driveway in 2002, killing him, and by Susan Auriemma, who backed over her 3-year-old daughter, Kate, in her driveway in 2005, injuring her.

1. When was the law passed?
2. What was the deadline?
3. What is the NHTSA?
4. What is the new program called?
5. What does it do?
6. Is everyone happy with it's action?
7. Who isn't?
8. Who is she>
9. What does she think it's trying to do?
10. From what?
11. Do safety groups think they are acting too quickly?
12. What do they think?
13. Do they think the cameras shouldn't be mandatory?
14. What do the cameras allow the people to see?
15. Where is that?
16. When was this announced?
17. What was supposed to happen the next day?
18. Against who?
19. Who is included in that?
20. Which individuals are filing suit?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. in 2008
2. 2011
3. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
4. its New Car Assessment Program
5. It's designed to encourage car manufacturers to improve vehicle safety.
6. No
7. Jackie Gillan
8. The president of Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety
9. divert attention
10. their failure to act
11. No
12. It's a stalling tactic
13. No
14. whether people or objects are in the blind spot
15. behind vehicles
16. Tuesday
17. a group was expected to file a suit
18. the U.S. Department of Transportation
19. The NHTSA
20. a group of safety advocates, including two parents

Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

CHAPTER XXXIII. THE LAST JACOBITE RISING.

While the Kirk was vainly striving to assuage the tempers of Mr Erskine and his friends, the Jacobites were preparing to fish in troubled waters. In 1739 Walpole was forced to declare war against Spain, and Walpole had previously sounded James as to his own chances of being trusted by that exiled prince. James thought that Walpole was merely angling for information. Meanwhile Jacobite affairs were managed by two rivals, Macgregor (calling himself Drummond) of Balhaldy and Murray of Broughton. The sanguine Balhaldy induced France to suppose that the Jacobites in England and Scotland were much more united, powerful, and ready for action than they really were, when Argyll left office in 1742, while Walpole fell from power, Carteret and the Duke of Newcastle succeeding. In 1743 Murray found that France, though now at war with England over the Spanish Succession, was holding aloof from the Jacobite cause, though plied with flourishing and fabulous reports from Balhaldy and the Jacobite Lord Sempill. But, in December 1743, on the strength of alleged Jacobite energy in England, Balhaldy obtained leave from France to visit Rome and bring Prince Charles. The Prince had kept himself in training for war and was eager. Taking leave of his father for the last time, Charles drove out of Rome on January 9, 1744; evaded, in disguise, every trap that was set for him, and landed at Antibes, reaching Paris on February 10. Louis did not receive him openly, if he received him at all; the Prince lurked at Gravelines in disguise, with the Earl Marischal, while winds and waves half ruined, and the approach of a British fleet drove into port, a French fleet of invasion under Roqueville (March 6, 7, 1744).

1. Who was disguised?
2. What was his title?
3. Where was he hiding?
4. What year was war declared?
5. Against who?
6. Who was the leader at the time?
7. When did Walpole leave his position?
8. When did he depart from Rome?
9. Did he get caught in a trap?
10. Who led the French troops in 1744?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. Charles
2. Prince
3. Rome
4. 1739
5. Spain
6. James
7. 1742
8. December 1743
9. No
10. Roqueville

Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

One sunny day, Martha went on a walk through the park. While walking, she noticed something strange. No one was outside. She was the only person at the park. "How strange, where is everyone?" she thought. Martha looked everywhere. She looked inside the restrooms, under the benches, and even at the top of the slide. She was confused. Usually, she would see her friends playing with each other. She started walking again when one of her friends popped up, surprising her. Her friend asked her, "Why are you outside?" Martha asked what she meant, and explained that she always came out to the park to play. Her friend then looked at her strangely and asked, "Didn't Stephan invite you to his party?" Martha hadn't known that Stephan was holding a party. She was sad that he hadn't invited her. She walked back home, upset.

1. Who was walking?
2. Where?
3. Was she the only person there?
4. How did she feel?
5. Whose party was it?
6. Was she invited?
7. Where did she go?
8. Feeling?
9. What was the weather?
10. Did she notice something strange?

Numbered answers:

A:
1. Martha
2. One day
3. Yes
4. confused.
5. Stephan's
6. No
7. Home.
8. upset.
9. Sunny
10. yes