Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example

Now, solve this: But the thing is...she couldn't have said anything else. If you are a musher and you say anything bad about the Iditarod, they can ban you. It's the new gag order on mushers, which I think is incredibly newsworthy. She couldn't say that she wasn't "satisfied with how the ITC was handling it," in fact she was specifically obligated to say that she WAS satisfied, because she's not allowed to say anything bad. Medred decided that this wasn't OK and went ahead with the story, a decision I think was right.

I guess he could have left her name out of it, but perhaps the info was already out there and telling the story with no name attached would have been weird.
Solution:
No