You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: The fish rot begins in the head. As a citizen participant at City Hall, I have observed Caldwell's methodical retaliation against Mr. Chuck Totto take place. Natalie Iwasa is another citizen witness.

It's the classic method of ousting an independent Totto from the Ethics Commission office - - Tighten the purse string; rein in the decision-making abilities of Director Totto; gag Totto from talking to the public; make Totto time-clock every 6 minutes; and stack enough votes to force Totto out.

Caldwell then dishonestly turns around to say "he doesn't know" what's going on or disperses disingenuous statements that insult the public intelligence or play his political games: "Caldwell refused to be interviewed for this report, saying through his campaign spokeswoman that he was too busy to discuss city ethics before the Aug. 13 primary."

Caldwell unequivocally DOES NOT deserve a second term. Caldwell has a very bad record of retaliation, bullying and abusing his public office.
Output:
Non-obscene