Premise:
"oh definitely oh absolutely incidentally oh i can't remember the name of that place there's a beautiful park up there and they do have a uh uh oh sort of a hotel a lodge a lodge that's what it is"
Hypothesis: There is a great park with lots of trees and wildlife.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: yes and i hate it how about you If this premise is true, does that tell us:"I hate it. What about you?"?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "We ramped up LSC's profile by visiting programs and participating in local meetings and national conferences to relay our message, hear reactions and improve relationships.", can we conclude that "LSC had a bad public relations scandal before taking these steps to improve relations."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: The method of measuring revenue depends on the nature of the property.

Sentence B: Measuring revenue in terms of method depends on the nature of the property, explained the lawyer.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: yeah they're they're lean-to's they're um yeah they're pretty nice they're they're uh
They're pretty nice yes.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Uses EIA's limited (but best available) data in some areas (e.g.

Here is a hypothesis:
EIA has the best data in the following places. New York, Washington, and Pennsylvania.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell