Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: And how does corporate welfare we are all paying for, in a global economy suit your careful sensibility? The narrow focus of one aspect of manipulation of so much that is interconnected, shows how you could move elsewhere, yet still manage to complain about indigenous land ownership in perpetuity.

They had all that before the European industrial revolution allowed them to steal with impunity. And treaty upon treaty was supposed to allow them to recover from that loss; yet the indigenous peoples were repeatedly put into a smaller holding cell & given less rations than previously.

You are on stolen property & yet would seek to stand 'your' ground there? ;)

A: No
****
Q: Those stupid liberals are just awful!!! I mean, how can they think that its fair to infringe on our rights to shoot the gay and latino and black people, and keep the women in the kitchen!

I mean, isn't it just an outrage to assume that these people have civil rights???

A: Yes
****
Q: I realize that I've been critical of Obama in the past, but when I step back and look at what he's accomplished I have to admit I'm impressed. Obamacare is a huge advance over what we had (nothing). Serious action to address climate change. Appointed highly qualified supreme court justices that aren't hyper political and conservative.

He was far from perfect. Too much militarism, too cozy with big business and all that. But given the congress he had to deal with he made more progress can I expected. And just think if he had lost either election.

The republicans deserve Trump. And they deserve the drubbing they're going to get. Bernie or Hillary will crush him.

A:
Yes
****