In this task, you need to write an incorrect answer to the given question. Along with the question, you are also given the correct answer(s) and the associated paragraph. An incorrect answer should be closely related to the content of the paragraph and/or the question but will not truthfully answer the question. Your incorrect answers should be similar to the given correct answer such that it will pose a challenge for students to distinguish the two. A good incorrect answer should prevent those who skip the paragraph from answering the question. The incorrect answer should not be trivial, in the sense that they should not be easily eliminated without reading the paragraph.

[EX Q]: Paragraph- Sent 1: For most lawyers, full waiting rooms and appointments booked out to mid-July would equate to a lucrative law practice.
Sent 2: But Frank Smith drives a 6-year-old car with 140,000 miles on it, and paying his senior paralegal minimum wage the last few months has put him in the red.
Sent 3: Hoped-for federal grants haven"t come through, so he"s had to raise his rates.
Sent 4: As of last week he charges $50 an hour minimum instead of $25 for the services of his yearling Northern Utah Legal Aid Foundation.
Sent 5: That"s in a lawyer"s market where fees range in the $150 to $250 an hour range in the Ogden area, and up to $400 an hour in the Salt Lake area.
Sent 6: Smith"s one-lawyer foundation basically helps the folks who have too much money to qualify for the federally funded Utah Legal Services, but not enough money to afford a lawyer.
Question: Is the average hourly rate in the Ogden area lower or higher than Frank Smith's hourly rate?.
[EX A]: About the same.

[EX Q]: Paragraph- Sent 1: Greta ran to the corner with her older brother Tony.
Sent 2: He had money for the ice cream truck in his pocket and she was very happy.
Sent 3: The ice cream truck had been parked at the curb waiting for children for a very long time.
Sent 4: The ice cream truck driver thought that no more children were coming to get ice cream so he started pulling away from the curb when they got to the corner.
Sent 5: They yelled.
Sent 6: They screamed, "Stop!
Sent 7: Stop!"Sent 8: and jumped up and down on the side walk trying to get him to see them.
Sent 9: The driver of the truck saw them, waved at them and smiled, pulled back to the curb and opened his truck up so that they could see everything that he had for sale.
Sent 10: They were so excited.
Sent 11: They saw some new treats.
Sent 12: Tony wanted to try something new.
Sent 13: He got an ice cream sundae with chocolate ice cream and nuts.
Sent 14: He almost got a snow cone.
Sent 15: Greta looked at everything that the ice cream truck had.
Sent 16: She saw candy, ice cream cones, snow cones, and everything else.
Sent 17: It all looked so good.
Sent 18: But after looking at everything, she wanted to get an ice cream sandwich.
Sent 19: She got the ice cream sandwich.
Sent 20: She bit into it and smiled.
Sent 21: It tasted so good.
Sent 22: She felt so happy.
Sent 23: Her brother, Tony, was happy too.
Sent 24: He bit into his ice cream cone sundae and grinned.
Sent 25: They walked home with their ice cream and told their mom about how close they came to not getting their ice cream at all.
Sent 26: Their mom was happy that the truck had stopped for them.
Sent 27: She said that they were very lucky to have gotten to the curb before the ice cream truck left.
Question: Where was the ice cream truck that Greta ran to?.
[EX A]: Driving.

[EX Q]: Paragraph- Sent 1: Iwasaki's careful respect for the Long Beach program and its lawyers earned him the political capital he needed to complete his takeover in a matter of weeks.
Sent 2: "The Long Beach program had strong support in the community so in a situation like that, one has to recognize that it's not like a takeover where I have all the answers and I know best," Iwasaki said.
Sent 3: "The people in the community who are working there have the contacts and the knowledge that will allow service to continue."Sent 4: Things have gone less smoothly across town.
Sent 5: There, Dudovitz, a longtime poverty lawyer and executive director of the San Fernando Valley's 36-year-old legal aid program, continues to struggle with his hostile takeover of the neighboring San Gabriel-Pomona Valleys service area one year after it was accomplished.
Sent 6: On the bright side, Dudovitz has extended his respected program to clients in the San Gabriel-Pomona Valley, and he now operates on a much larger budget, $6.5 million last year.
Sent 7: However, his clash with the old San Gabriel program resulted in litigation, bitter feelings and a mission that some say is not clearly focused on serving poor people.
Sent 8: "It was a difficult situation that was probably mishandled by everyone," a longtime observer of the public interest community said of the San Fernando Valley-San Gabriel-Pomona Valley merger.
Sent 9: "There are very few people who come out as the heroes.
Sent 10: Personalities got involved when they shouldn't have.
Sent 11: Things were said that caused bad feelings and couldn't be unsaid."Sent 12: Iwasaki's merger with the smaller, 48-year-old Long Beach program was friendly and fast, and no one - not even Long Beach board members - lost a job.
Sent 13: When it was over, Iwasaki had $1 million more in federal dollars and two new offices.
Sent 14: Long Beach clients regained services they had lost years ago when federal budget cuts and dwindling grants reduced the staff of 15 lawyers to five and cut immigration and consumer law programs.
Sent 15: Iwasaki said, "[I judged the transition] better than I could have hoped for.".
Question: What is the budget Dudovitz now operates on?.
[EX A]:
$7.5 million.