The following note is from Kim Watson: Please review the attached proposal for Pemex (MGI) for firm transportation on Transwestern. Please forward all comments back to Steve Harris. We would like to send this out today, so your prompt attention would be appreciated. I am on vacation until October 8 and Mark will not return to the office until October 1. Steve, once all comments have been incorporated, please forward to Jorge at Pemex at his email address of jrojas@gas.pemex.com Please feel free to call me on my cell phone to discuss (713-416-5059) Thanks, Kim
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Pemex (MGI) Proposal
Here is the Commission's basic policy on reverse open seasons. I've asked Randy Rich to look into the other aspects of your questions, which we'll discuss shortly. The Commission has a two-step process for determining whether the market finds an expansion project economically viable. The first step, which occurs prior to the certificate application, is for the pipeline to conduct an open season in which existing customers are given an opportunity to permanently relinquish their capacity. This first step ensures that a pipeline will not expand capacity if the demand for that capacity can be filled by existing shippers relinquishing their capacity. The second step is that the expansion shippers must be willing to purchase capacity at a rate that pays the full costs of the project, without subsidy from existing shippers through rolled-in pricing. The reverse open season requirement (i.e., the requirement that a pipeline give customers the opportunity to turn back capacity) is established Commission policy. It was stated in the Commission's Pricing Policy for New and Existing Facilities Constructed by Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines, 71 FERC P61,241 at p. 61,917 (1995), reh'g denied, 75 FERC P61,105, and later reiterated in Certification on New interstate Natural Gas Pipeline Facilities (Certificate Policy Statement), 88 FERC P61,227 (1999), order clarifying statement of policy, 90 FERC P61,128, order further clarifying statement of policy, 92 FERC P61,094 (2000). My research has indicated that the Commission has provided few specifics on how a reverse open season is to be conducted. This probably allows pipelines considerable discretion in how they conduct their solicitations of turnback. General Commission policy would probably require only that shippers be given adequate notice of and opportunity to respond to the reverse open season. If the procedure used by El Paso for soliciting turnback becomes an issue, please let me know and let's discuss it. I'll be up in a few minutes for our call to Randy.
Answer: El Paso
Here is an email: Attached is an electronic version of the Merger Agreement that we executed = with Dynegy. As is typical with these types of transactions, there are lim= itations imposed on Enron's operations between signing and closing of the M= erger Agreement. Please help ensure that each transaction entered into by = Enron and its subsidiaries complies with the agreement, and particularly Se= ction 7.1 of the agreement relating to conduct of business. Peter del Vecc= hio (at ext. 39875) and Joe Henry (at ext. 51549) are available to help add= ress specific questions regarding our interim operations. Rob Walls, John = Ale, Mark Haedicke and myself are also available, and we will help determin= e if we need Dynegy's consent for any particular proposed transaction. We = are in the process of summarizing the interim covenants, as well as establi= shing certain procedures to ensure our compliance. I anticipate distributi= ng these items on Thursday. We are also having prepared a memorandum regar= ding certain anti-trust and other issues that we need to consider in any in= volvement we have with Dynegy regarding our respective operations. We curr= ently plan on having various presentations regarding the anti-trust matters= . Please pass the merger agreement and the subsequent materials on to othe= rs in your group as you think appropriate. Thank you for your help and und= erstanding in this matter. Lance. =20 Merger Agreement for Project Gipper.DOC=20
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Merger Agreement
Q: Knew you'd be dying to know that Barry Staw will be teaching a class on "Creativity" in the Spring. Be sure to reserve your place today! Best,
Propose a subject line
A: Great News!
IN: I will be drawing names in about one hour for the monitor sale. If you'd like to get your name in the drawing, and haven't had a chance to send me an email, please do. Here is the price breakdown again: Older 17' units - $10 Newer Compaq 17' units - $20 Older 21' units - $25 Newer Compaq 19' units - $35 Regards,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Monitor Sale
IN: This is an email
Congratulations on your new responsibilities. I look forward to working with you on the Litigation Unit stuff (as Eric will advise you, a very pleasant task!). DF

What is the subject?

OUT:
Changes in Administrative Responsibilties