Definition: Craft one correct answer to the question given in input. To make it more interesting, try to use non-stereotypical language if possible. Make sure your correct answer is reasonably long, consistent with the context, and requires common sense (instead of explicit extraction from the context.) In your answer, use as few words as possible from the given context. Use a response that is uncommon/non-stereotypical, so that it is less predictable. To be less repetitive, please vary your language for each question.
Input: Context: Scientists hold that the only things that can be truly known about the world are those that we can sense and record and so prove . Science aims to produce truth - claims of the sort , " Under X conditions , Y will occur " . Such claims have an incredible plausibility because they can be repeated . The metaphysicians never managed to create anything of this sort ; nothing they ever said could be proved in the real world .
Question: What would people say about scientists if they could not prove any of their theories ?
Output:
They would say that theories are not true and that the scientists have done a poor job.