I have gotten a call from Roger Mock, CEO of American Public Energy Agency, regarding a series of transactions. In 1999 we (ENA through Enron Natural Gas Marketing Corp.) entered into a 12-year prepay. We got approximately $297MM in cash up front, with delivery obligations at various delivery points, including NNG-Demarc, Rockies, TW-SJ, NIT, Topock and Sumas over the life of the deal. Currently the end users are Clark Public Utility District (Washington State), City of Glendale (California), City of Pasadena Water and Power Department (California), and Sacramento Municipal Utility District (California). It is my understanding that ENGMC is not currently in bankruptcy. I am sending down to Mike's attention a CD with the project documents on it. I apologize in advance for the absence of a table of contents, but I felt lucky just to get the information. Teresa Bushman may have a hard copy of the documents.
Answer: APEA Gas Prepay Transaction
Here is an email: I believe Jeff Bartlet will be seeking your approval to the standstill provision in the above agreement. I just wanted to make sure that you are aware that Enron Corp. as an affiliate of ENA would be bound by the provision, since (i) it will have access to the confidential information or (ii) if it takes any of the actions prohibited by paragraph 5 of that letter at the direction of ENA. Please let me know if you have any questions about this.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Covanta Confidentiality Agreement
Q: Hi Tracy, I've been thinking of you since Enron's in the news all the time now. I bet it is stressful around there now. How are you doing? How was your Thanksgiving? We were in Houston last weekend after Thanksgiving & took my parents to Galveston for the weekend. Dylan got his first ear infection so I wasn't able to see anyone but Stephanie. Email me back. Bye, Dana
Propose a subject line
A: Hi Tracy!
IN: I got a call from Tino Monaldo today passing on the results of Dennis Langley's meeting with DOE in Albuquerque. DOE indicated that their current PNM rate is "5.3 cents, exclusive of the demand charge." Tino's consultant claims that factoring in the demand charge yields an effective rate of approximately 7 cents/KWh. Assuming we need to come in at 10% less than the current rate, our bogey is 6.3 cents/KWh. This is at the high end of the range we hoped they'd be in. Additionally, DOE indicated that they need "redundancy" and don't want to rely on PNM for back up power. They want a multiple turbine facility--i.e.,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Pueblo
IN: This is an email
Randy, this is a short summary of the environmental findings that were identified during the records review conducted at the Corpus Christi Koch facility offices on May 1st and 2nd of this year. All environmental records which were available in the file data room at the Koch office were reviewed. Assumptions were made that the environmental records were complete for all assets included in the sale. Primary emphasis was placed on those environmental issues which are normally associated with a sale or purchase of assets dealing with distribution and transmission of crude oil. In particular, pipeline and tank farms were the most critical assets which were reviewed. Based upon the data review, the Koch assets were in compliance with the following: Air permitting, permit by rule, standard expemtions, recordkeeping and fee payments were documented NSPS recordkeeping and inspections for VOC control on large crude oil tanks were documented Oil Pollution Act-OPA 90 plans had been prepared and were up to date SARA compliance and reporting had been completed SPCC plans had been prepared for each site which qualified under 40 CFR 112 Spill reporting history and notifications to the state agency were available for review There are ongoing groundwater and soil remediation activities at one site included in the asset for sale (permits for the remediation activity is in place) Hazardous waste notifications, annual reportings and fee payments were documented Based upon the above review, there were no issues which could be identified which would be condsidered a major environmental limitation or would be a considered a major environmental liability. This statement is again based upon the assumption that all environmental information was present in the data room for the assets in question. It should also be stated that this analysis of Koch's environmental compliance is based upon the fact that Koch has not held back or provided false or misleading information or knowledge during their presentation or informaiton contained in the facility files. Pending further development and interest of this potential purchase, a recommendation is made to conduct a phase I due diligence and site visit to each location to verify findings from the records review. Also, due to the past history of Koch's operating practices, it is recommended that contract conditions be implicitly stated that EOTT will not be held liable for discoveries of past deficiencies or releases of contamination which have occurred on any of the Koch assets purchased.

What is the subject?

OUT: Environmental findings, Koch South Texas Records Review
The word is out! The KSU game with Texas A & M will be telecast at 11:30 this coming Saturday. There will be a Watch Party at the SRO in Northwest Mall starting promptly at 11:30. Hope many of you can be there. The Wildcats need our help against the Fighting Farmers from College Station. But we can do it! Hope you will come out and support the team! GO CATS! Our Alumni Club had a fun night last night at Jillian's for our annual "Sunflowers and Sage" scholarship benefit. About 60 were there. Wish more of you could have come! We always have a great time with Dan Lauck and Matt Musil as our emcees and Matt is our very persuasive and fun auctioneer! You missed a fun and informative talk by Zac Burton '00, back-up quarterback. A great time was had by all! Ken and I want to thank our committee for their help and for all who participated in the auction. We'll be in Manhattan for the Aggie game - watch for us! Joyce
Answer:
A & M Game