[Q]: Honourable senators, what can we do when one can fairly conclude, after a fair read of the current controversy between Mr. Justice McClung and Madam Justice L'Heureux-Dub and their respective decision, that both justices fell below standards of appropriate judicial self-restraint - Justice McClung in his obviously injudicious letter, and Madam Justice L'Heureux-Dub in her injudicious or intemperate language in her decision? The two justices both acted inappropriately
[A]: Yes

[Q]: Neophilologus, in full "Neophilologus: an international journal of modern and mediaeval language and literature", is an ongoing peer-reviewed journal devoted to the study of modern and mediaeval languages and literature, including general linguistics, literary theory and comparative literature. The journal started in 1915 and is now published by Springer Science+Business Media BV. Neophilologus contains a p
[A]: Yes

[Q]: This dialogue with western Canadians showed us that, beyond the hollow rhetoric, do-nothing attitude and piecemeal approach of the Liberal government, ways can be found to establish sound political relations, based on a new partnership that will serve the interests of both Canada and Quebec. A lot of people do not agree
[A]: It's impossible to say

[Q]: Trump's lawyer accused Comey of committing a felony, but the lawyer got the facts he based this accusation on wrong. "Although Mr. Comey testified he only leaked the memos in response to a tweet, the public record reveals that the New York Times was quoting from these memos the day before the referenced tweet, which belies Mr. Comey's excuse for this unauthorized disclosure of privileged information and appears to entirely retaliatory," Marc Kasowitz, President Trump's personal lawyer said in rebuttal to Comey's stunning testimony. Trump's lawyer is married
[A]:
It's impossible to say