Gentlemen: Attached is a draft of the facility agreement, without reference to WestLB. It just came in, so I haven't reviewed it. It looks like 330 tomorrow will work for this group, unless you tell me otherwise. I'll get back to you with the location. Kay
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: GE Contract
I'm dragging myself out of this office. I can hardly keep my eyes open, but it's well-deserved. Santana concert last night with friends from Ashland. The social schedule just never lets up. I don't know how feasible it would be for me to spend two months resisting the temptations of hand-holding boys and shadowy bars. But I will think seriously about the idea. Have a safe trip back home. Oh, and my Christmas plans still stand - gone from Dec. 22 to Jan. 2. Maybe it's you who needs a schedule rearrangement. Kate
Answer: end of a long day
Here is an email: COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES JUNE 06, 2001 Notice ID: 2782 5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED SUBJECT: AUCTION OF FTS AND ISS CAPACITY Columbia Gas Transmission has posted the following offers of FTS capacity. Additional details of this capacity may be found in the Columbia Internet NAVIGATOR system under the Capacity Release Folder, Offers, Offers Summary, Offer Type, Capacity Auctions, under the following offer numbers: Offer Rate Receipt No. Schedule Point Delivery Point 32602 FTS Direct App Market Area 5 32603 FTS Leach Market Area 5 32629 FTS Milford Market Area 21 32604 FTS Leach Market Area 1 32605 FTS Leach Market Area 5 32606 FTS Leach Market Area 5 32607 FTS Crossroads Market Area 5 32633 FTS Leach Market Area 7 32609 FTS Leach Market Area 8 32610 FTS Crossroads Market Area 8 32611 FTS Leach Market Area 8 32612 FTS Leach Market Area 9 32613 FTS Crossroads Market Area 9 32614 FTS Leach Market Area 10 32615 FTS Leach Market Area 12 32616 FTS Leach Market Area 15 32617 FTS Leach Market Area 19 32618 FTS AO4 Alexander Market Area 32 Agg. 32620 FTS Leach Market Area 5 32621 FTS Leach Market Area 8 32622 FTS Leach Market Area 9 32623 FTS Leach Market Area 12 32625 FTS Leach Market Area 15 32631 FTS Highland Market Area 38 32638 ISS For additional information, please contact your Account Representative or your Customer Services Team.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: AUCTION OF FTS AND ISS CAPACITY
Q: INTERNAL COMMUNICATION REGARDING DELAYS IN RETAIL COMPETITION IN TEXAS October 29, 2001 The main purpose of this memo is to inform EPMI and EES commercial teams regarding the implementation status of retail competition Texas, particularly in non-ERCOT regions, which include parts of the areas served by the following utilities: ? Southwestern Electric Power Company (SWEPCO) and West Texas Utilities Company (WTU) - both in the SPP region ? Entergy Gulf States (EGSI) - in the Energy-SERC region As most of you probably have heard, the Texas Utility Commission has been examining, in the last few weeks, the readiness to implement retail competition in those areas. The Public Utility Commission of Texas (Staff) has filed petitions seeking a determination of whether market institutions are ready for retail competition in above areas, to start January 01, 2002. There is a concern among the Commission and many other participants that non-ERCOT-Texas regions are not ready for competition. This concern has two major causes: - Lack of a vibrant, efficient wholesale market in those regions, where newly established REPs could have full access to others suppliers, on a non-discriminatory basis - Lack of success in the retail pilot programs developed in 2001 - no alternative suppliers and no customer shifting at all; a recent hearing has confirmed most REPs absolute lack of interest in those regions - at least for the time being SPP Last Week, the Public Utility Commission decided to delay competition in SPP Texas. Or, more accurately, "to delay customer choice", in the Commission preferred language. Enron, who was requested to file a testimony, opposed to any delays, under the argument that SPP is not a "perfect market", but REPs could trade in this market as other marketers do. No final dates have been established yet. However, one estimates that the delay may vary from 12 to 18 months. The Commission has established some clear actions and milestones before retail competition is implemented: - Support SPP to begin wholesale market operations, which involves refinements and upgrades in a few of existing systems, such as settlement; - Reform in SPP Tariffs and implementation of a market based congestion management; - Continue the pilot, attract new competitors and open the market. As part of this effort, the Commission created a Southwest Power Pool Market Readiness Implementation Project (Docket # 24869) to develop the necessary steps to transition to full competition, identify milestones, monitor progress and report to the Commission on a regular basis. Enron will be supporting this effort. SERC SERC regions bear resemblance with SPP, in terms of Commission's intent to delay competition. The most important difference is that the incumbent utility, EGSI, an Entergy subsidiary, has strongly supported timely implementation. The Commission fears that Entergy will benefit from its "monopolistic" position in the region, in the absence of other REPs. No final decisions have been made yet. Entergy Gulf States, in conjunction with the Commission Staff and other interested parties have gone through a settlement process, whereby retail competition will be delayed until September 15, 2002. The subject is still being examined by the Commission and no final decisions have been made. However, we expect the Commission to approve the Settlement Agreement, therefore delaying competition until September 15, 2002. ERCOT All the discussion about delays in competition focuses on non-ERCOT Texas only. There are rumors and ongoing discussions about delaying competition in ERCOT-Texas, which is scheduled to take place on January 01, 2002. For example, Nancy Hetrich from Enron, will be attending the Legislative Oversight Committee on Friday, November 02. She will be appearing in her capacity of Chair of RMS Sub-Committee. Contrary to non-ERCOT, there is a strong support from most industry participants to have retail competition on time. Besides, the results from the pilots were successful and ERCOT is supposed to provide vibrant wholesale competition. Therefore, unlike SPP and Entergy, there should be no material reasons or fears to delay retail competition in ERCOT-Texas. We will keep you apprised as things evolve.
Propose a subject line
A: Retail Competition In Texas - Internal Communication
IN: This is an email
Sorry I couldn't make it for cake last night. I had to work late last night...Big Shock!!! Anyway, hope it was fun and that you're having a great week. Mine has been pretty busy work wise. I'm sure you're curious about Mr. Noble. All I can say right now is that, while I definitely still like him (we had a great time Sunday), I am some what annoyed with him right now...he's been very wishy-washy the first half of this week. I'm not real sure what I'm going to do about it, but I'm sure I'll think of something.

What is the subject?

OUT:
Absent friend...