Shri Ramtanu Co-Operative Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 5 August, 1970 Equivalent citations: 1970 AIR 1771, 1971 SCR (1) 719, AIR 1970 SUPREME COURT 1771 Author: A.N. Ray Bench: A.N. Ray, M. Hidayatullah, J.M. Shelat, G.K. Mitter, C.A. Vaidyialingam PETITIONER: SHRI RAMTANU CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ANR. Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/08/1970 BENCH: RAY, A.N. BENCH: RAY, A.N. HIDAYATULLAH, M. (CJ) SHELAT, J.M. MITTER, G.K. VAIDYIALINGAM, C.A. CITATION: 1970 AIR 1771 1971 SCR (1) 719 1970 SCC (3) 323 CITATOR INFO : F 1971 SC1188 (4) R 1976 SC1031 (18) F 1977 SC 183 (6) ACT: Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961-Maharashtra Development Corporation formed under the Act whether a trading corporation Legislative competence-Legislation falls under Entry 24 of the State List and not under Entry 43 of Union List-Act is valid-No discrimination in procedure for acquisition under above Act and Land Requisition Act, 1894- Proviso to s. 33 of Maharashtra Act does not restrict judicial power of Collector in determining compensation. Shri Ramtanu Co-Operative Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 5 August, 1970  1 HEADNOTE: In a petition under Art. 32 of the Constitution of India the petitioners challenged the validity of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. In support of the petition it was contended : (i) that the Maharashtra legislature was incompetent to enact the Act because the Act was for the incorporation, regulation and winding up of the Maharashtra Development Corporation which was a trading corporation; accordingly the impugned legislation fell within Entry 43 of List I (.Union List) or the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution; (ii) that there was a special procedure designed by the land Acquisition Act for acquisition of land for the companies whereas in the present case under the provisions of the impugned Act the State was acquiring land for companies without adopting the procedure of the Land Acquisition Act and thus there was procedural discrimination; (iii) that the proviso to s. 33 of the impugned Act providing that no compensation exceeding such amount as the State Government may by general order specify to be paid for acquisition shall be determined by the Collector without the previous approval of the State Government or its nominee, was restrictive of the judicial power of the Collector. HELD : (i) It is the true intent of the Act i.e. its pith and substance which will determine the validity of the Act. Industries come within Entry 24 of the State List subject to the provision of Entry 7 and Entry 52 of the Union List of the Constitution. Entry 7 of the Union list relates to industries declared by Parliament by law to be necessary for the purpose of defence or for the prosecution of war. Entry 52 of the Union List relates industries the control of which by the Union is declared by Parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest. The establishment, growth and development of industries in the State of Maharashtra does not fall within Entry 7 and Entry, 52 of the Union List. Establishment growth and development of industries in the State is within the State List of industries. The, pith and substance of the Act is establishment growth and development of industries, and acquisition of land in that behalf carries out the purposes of the Act by setting up the Corporation as one of the limbs or agencies of the Government. 'Me powers and functions of the Corporation show in no certain terms that these are all in aid of the principal and predominant purpose of establishment and growth of industries. When the Government is satisfied that the Corporation has substantially achieved the purposes for which the Corporation is established, 720 the Corporation will be dissolved because the raison d'etre is gone. It must, therefore, be held that the Act is a valid piece of legislation. [725 F-726 D] Shri Ramtanu Co-Operative Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 5 August, 1970  2 The contention that the Corporation was a trading one, or that it Was -a Government company within the meaning of s. 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 could not be accepted. [Reason dissussed] The true character of the Corporation in the present case is to act as an architectural agent of the development and growth of industrial towns by establishing and developing industrial estates and industrial areas. [727 B-728 F] (ii) The contention that there was procedural discrimination is between the present Act and the Land Acquisition Act could not be accepted. The Maharashtra Industrial Development Act is a special one having the specific and special purpose of growth, development and Organisation ,of industries. That Act has its own procedure. Under the Land Acquisition Act acquisition is at the instance of and for the benefit of a company whereas under the present Act acquisition is solely by the State for public purposes. 'Me two acts arc dissimilar in situation and circumstances. [728 H-729 E] (iii) The proviso to s. 33 no doubt provides that where the amount of compensation determined by the Collector is higher than what the State Government may by general order specify the approval of the State Government is necessary, But sub- s. (5) of s. 33 states that in determining the compensation the Collector shall be guided by the provisions contained in sections 23 and 24 and other relevant provisions of the Land Acquitition Act. There is no ceiling fixed by the Government. Further there is an appeal to the Court from the decision of the Collector. The decision of the Court will finally determine the amount of compensation. There is thus no restriction on the powers of the Collector in the matter of determination of compensation, although the approval of Government may be necessary in the Government interest. [729 F-730 C] JUDGMENT: ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petitions Nos. 182 of 1969 and 42 to 45 of 1968. Petition under Art. 32 of the Constitution of India for enforcement of the fundamental rights. D. M. Parulekar and A. G. Ratnaparkhi, for the petitioners (in W.P. No. 182 of 1969). S. S. Shukla, for the petitioners (in W.P. No. 42 to 45 of 1968. S. T. Desai, G. L. Sanghi, B. D. Sharma for S. P. Nayar, for respondents Nos. 1 to 3 (in W.P. No. 182 of 1969) and the respondents (in W.P. Nos. 42 to 45 of 1968). The Judgment of the Court was delivered by- Shri Ramtanu Co-Operative Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 5 August, 1970  3 Ray, J. These petitioners raise two principal questions. First, whether the State of Maharashtra (hereinafter referred to as the State) is competent to enact the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, + 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act): secondly, whether there is procedural discrimination between the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 and the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, The contentions of the petitioners are that. the Act is for the incorporation, regulation -and winding up of the Maharashtra Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation) and that the Corporation is a trading one and therefore the impugned legislation falls within Entry 43 of List I of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. On behalf of the State-it is said on the other hand that the Act is for the growth and development of industries in the State of Maharashtra and for acquisition of land in that behalf and the Corporation is established for carrying out the purposes of the Act, and, therefore,the legislation is valid. The true character,scope and intent of the Act is to be ascertained with reference to the purposes and the provisions of the Act. The Act is one to make a special provision for securing the orderly establishment in industrial areas and industrial estates of industries in the State of Maharashtra, and to assist generally in the Organisation thereof, and for that purpose to establish an Industrial Development Corporation, and for purposes con- nected with the matters aforesaid. The Corporation is established for the purpose of securing and assisting the rapid and orderly establishment and organisation of industries in industrial areas and industrial estates in the State of Maharashtra. The Corporation consists of 8 members, two of whom are nominated by the. State Government of whom one shall be the Financial Adviser to the Corporation, one member nominated by the State Electricity Board, one member nominated by the Housing Board and three members nominated by the State Government, from amongst person appearing to Government to be qualified as having had experience of , and having shown capacity in, industry or trade or finance or who are in the opinion of the Government capable of representing the interest of persons engaged or employed therein, and the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, who shall be the Secretary of the Corporation. The functions of the Corporation shall, be generally to promote and assist in the rapid and orderly establishment, growth and development of industries in the State of Maharashtra and to establish and manage industrial estates at places selected by the State Government, develop industrial areas selected by the State Government for the purpose and make them available for undertakings to estab- lish themselves, assist financially by loans industries to move their factories into such estates or areas, and to undertake schemes or works, either jointly with other corporate bodies or institutions, or 69Sup.CI(P)71-2 with Government or local authorities, or on agency basis, in furtherance of the purposes for which the Corporation is established and all matters connected therewith. An industrial area under the Act means any area declared to be an industrial area by the State Government by notification in the Official Gazette which is to be developed and where industries are to be accommodated. An industrial estate under the Act means any site selected by the State Government, where the Corporation builds factories and other buildings and makes them available for any site selected by the State Government, where the Corporation means the carrying out of building, engineering, quarrying or other operations in, on, over or under land, or the making of any material change in any building or land, and includes redevelopment, but does not include Shri Ramtanu Co-Operative Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 5 August, 1970  4 mining operations. Amenity under the Act includes road, supply of water or electricity, street lighting, drainage, sewerage, conservancy and such other conveniences as the State Government may by notification in the Official Gazette specify to be an amenity for the purposes of the Act. We have referred to these expressions, industrial area, industrial 'estate, development and amenity in order to appreciate the general powers of the Corporation to discharge the functions of the Corporation in regard to the establishment, growth and development of industries, in the State. These powers are to acquire and hold property, movable and, immoveable for the performance of any of its activities, and to lease, sell, "change or otherwise trans- fer any property held by the Corporation on such conditions as may be deemed proper by the Corporation and also to purchase by agreement or to take on lease or under any form of tenancy any land, to erect such buildings and to "execute such other works as may be necessary for the purpose of carrying out its duties and functions, to provide or cause to be provided amenities and common facilities in industrial estates and industrial areas and construct and maintain or cause to be maintained works and buildings therefore, to make available buildings on hire or sale to industrialists or persons intending to start industrial undertakings, to construct buildings for the housing of the employees of such industries, to allot factory sheds or such buildings or parts of buildings, including residential tenements to suitable persons in the industrial estates established or developed by the Corporation, and to, do such other things and perform such acts as it may think necessary or expedient for the proper conduct of its functions, and the carrying into effect the purposes of this Act. Broadly stated 'the functions and powers of the Corporation are to-develop industrial areas and industrial estates by providing. amenities of Toad, supply of water or electricity, street,. lighting, drainage, sewerage, conservancy and other conveniences, secondly to construct works and buildings, factory sheds and thirdly, to make available buildings on hire or sale to industrialists or persons intending to start industrial undertakings and to allot factory sheds, buildings, residential tenements to suitable persons in industrial estates established or developed by the Corporation and to lease, sell, exchange or otherwise transfer any property held by the Corporation on such conditions as may be deemed proper by the Corporation. The development of industrial areas and industrial estates is intended to serve two objects. In the first place, there is to be an orderly establishment and growth of industries in the Bombay Poona sector. The second object is to secure dispersal of industries from the congested areas of the Bombay Poona sector to the under-developed parts of the St- ate. The industrial areas are broadly classified into two categories, namely, first, those meant for engineering and other industries which are not obnoxious, and, secondly, those meant for chemical industries. The establishment and growth of industries in the State is inextricably bound up with availability of land. - Available land in limited.Such limited supply leads to speculation in land. Power is therefore required for compulsory acquisition of land to achieve the purposes of the Act. At the same time, land owners are not to be deprived of the legitimate benefit of reasonable increase in land values in a developing economy. Development of chemical industries requires long stretches of pipelines to be laid for moving gas and other liquid , chemical products. The growth of industries in the State by establishment of industrial areas and industrial estates also means laying pipelines for carrying gas, water, electricity and constructing sewerage and drains. These amenities are essential. The absence of amenities is envisaged and answered in the Act by empowering the Corporation to provide these essential Shri Ramtanu Co-Operative Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 5 August, 1970  5 amenities, facilities and conveniences. The principal functions of the Corporation in regard to the establishment, growth and development of industries in the are first to establish and manage industrial, estates at selected places and secondly to develop industrial areas selected by the State Government. When industrial areas are selected the necessity of acquisition of land in those areas is apparent. The 'Act, therefore, contemplates that the, ate Government may acquire land by publishing a notice specifying the particular purpose for which such land is required. Before: the publication of the notice the owner of the land is given an -opportunity, to show cause as to why the land should not be acquired. The State after considering the cause shown by the owner the State Government may pass such orders as it deems fit. When a notice is published for acquisition of land, the land, shall, on and from the date of such publication, vest absolutely in the State, Government free from all en- cumbrances. Where the land has be-en acquired for the Corporation or any local authority, the State Government shall, after it has taken possession of the land, transfer the land to the Corporation or that local authority, for the purposes for which the land has been acquired subject to such terms and conditions which the -State Government may deem fit to impose. We have already noticed that for the purpose of the Act, namely, the establishment -and development of industries in the State the Corporation will establish industrial estates and develop industrial areas. Apart from establishing industrial estates and developing industrial areas the Corporation may dispose of any land acquired by the State Government and transferred to the Corporation without undertaking or carrying out any development thereof or transfer such land after undertaking or carrying out any development as it thinks fit. These powers of the Corporation with respect to the disposal of land are to be exercised so far as practicable, that where the Corporation proposes to dispose of by sale any such land without any development having been undertaken or carried ,out thereon, the Corporation shall offer the land in the first instance to the persons from whom it was acquired if they desire to purchase it subject to such requirements as to its development and use as the Corporation may think fit to impose. Against, the -persons who are residing or carrying on business or other activities on any such land shall, if they desire to obtain accommodation -on land belonging to the Corporation and are willing to comply with any requirements of the Corporation as to its development and use, have an opportunity to obtain thereon accommodation suitable to their reasonable requirements on terms settled with due regard to the price at which any such land has been. acquired 'from them. The other provisions in the Act are that the State Government may upon such conditions as may be agreed between the State 'Government and the Corporation, place at the disposal of the ,Corporation any land vested in the, State Government. After any such land has been developed by, or under the control and super-vision of, the Corporation, it shall be dealt with by the Corporation in accordance with the regulations made, and directions given -by the State Government in this behalf. Further, if Any land placed at the disposal of the Corporation is required at any time thereafter by the State Government, the Corporation shall replace it at the disposal of the State Government upon such terms and conditions as may be mutually agreed upon. There are two-other important provisions in the Act. In the first place, the State Government may issue to the Corporation such general or special directions as to policy as it may think necessary or expedient for the purpose of carrying out the purposes of the Act,_ and the Corporation shall be bound to follow and act upon such directions. These directions will be in the field of' establishment and management of industrial Shri Ramtanu Co-Operative Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 5 August, 1970  6 estates and development of industrial areas and carrying out the other powers of the Corporation in regard to the provision of amenities and common facilities, and assisting industrialists or industrial undertakings in. obtaining buildings or factory sheds or residential tenements or land for development of industries. The second important provision is that when the State Government is satisfied that the purposes for which the Corporation is established under the Act have been substantially achieved so as to render the continued existence of the Corporation in the opinion of the State Government unnecessary that Government may by notification in the Official Gazette declare that the Corporation shall be dissolved with effect , from such date as may be specified in the notification and the Corporation shall be deemed to be dissolved 'accordingly. Upon such dissolution, all properties, funds and dues which are vested' in or realisable by the Corporation shall vest in or be realised by the State Government and all liabilities enforceable against the Corporation shall be enforceable against the State Government. It is in the background of the purposes of the Act and powers and functions of the Corporation that the real and true character of the legislation will be determined. That is the doctrine of finding out the pith and substance of an Act. In deciding the pith and substance of the legislation, the true test is not to find out whether the Act has encroached upon or invaded any forbidden field but what the pith and substance of the Act is. It is true intent of the Act which will determine the validity of the Act. Industries come within Entry 24 of the State List subject to the provision of Entry 7 and Entry 52 of the Union List of the Constitution. Entry 7 of the Union List relates to industries declared by Parliament by law to necessary for the purpose of defence or for the prosecution of war. Entry 52 of the Union List relates to industries, the control of which by the Union is declared by Parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest. The establishment, growth and development of industries in the State of Maharashtra do not fall within Entry 7 and Entry 52 of the Union List. Establishment, growth and development of industries in the State is within the State List of industries. Furthermore,- to effectuate the purposes of the development of industries in the State it is necessary make land available. Such land can be made available by - acquisition or requisition. The Act in the present case deals with acquisition of land by the State and on such acquisitions the State may transfer the land to the Corporation which again may develop it itself and establish industrial estates or may develop industrial areas. Acqui- sition or requisition of land falls under Entry 42 of the Concurrent List. In order to achieve growth of industries it is necessary not ,only to acquire land but also to implement the purposes of the Act. The Corporation is therefore established for carrying out the purposes of the Act. 'De pith and substance of the Act is establishment, growth and Organisation of industries, acquisition of land in that behalf and carrying out the purposes of the Act by setting up the Corporation as one of the limbs or agencies of the Government. The powers and functions of the Corporation show in' no ,uncertain terms that these- are all in aid of the -principal and-predominant purpose of establishment, growth and establishment of ,industries. The Corporation is established for that purpose. When the Government is satisfied that the Corporation has substantially achieved the purpose for which the Corporation is established, the Corporation will be dissolved because the raison detre is gone. We, therefore, hold that the Act is a valid piece of legislation. The petitioners contended that -the Corporation was a trading one. The reasons given were that the Corporation could sell property, namely, transfer land; that the Corporation had borrowing powers-, and that the Corporation was entitled to moneys by way of rents and profits. Reliance was placed on Shri Ramtanu Co-Operative Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 5 August, 1970  7 the report of the Corporation and in particular on the income and expenditure of the Corporation to show that it was making profits. These features of transfer of land, or borrowing of moneys or receipt of rents and profits will by themselves neither be the indicia nor the decisive attributes of the trading character of the Corporation. Ordinarily, a Corporation is established by shareholders with their capital. The shareholders have their Directors for the regulation and management of the Corporation. Such a Corporation set up by the shareholders, carries on business and is intended for making profits. When profits are earned by such a Corporation they are distributed to shareholders by way of dividends or kept in reserve funds. In the present case, these attributes of a trading Corporation are absent. The Corporation is established by the Art for carrying out the purposes of the Act. The purposes of the Act are development of industries in the State. The Corporation consists of nominees -of the State Government, State Electricity Board and the Housing Board. The functions and powers of the Corporation indicate 'that the Corporation is acting as I a wing of the State Government in establishing industrial estates and developing industrial areas, acquiring property for those purposes, constructing buildings, allotting buildings, factory sheds to industrialists or industrial undertakings. It is obvious that the Corporation will receive moneys for disposal of land, buildings and other properties and also that the Corporation would receive rents and profits in appropriate ,cases. Receipts of these moneys arise not out of any business or trade but out of the sole purpose of establishment, growth and development of industries. The Corporation has to provide amenities and facilities in industrial estates and industrial areas. Amenities of road, electricity, sewerage and other facilities in industrial estates and industrial areas are within the programme of work of the Corporation. The fund of the Corporation consists of moneys received from the State Government, all fees, costs and charges received by the Corporation, all moneys received by the Corporation from the disposal of lands, buildings and other properties and all moneys received by the Corporation by way of rents and profits or in any other manner The Corporation shall have the authority to spend such sums out of the general funds of the Corporation or from reserve and other funds. The Corporation is to make provision for reserve and other specially denominated funds as the State Government may direct. The Corporation accepts deposits from persons, authorities or institutions to whom allotment or sale of land, buildings, or sheds is made or is likely to be made in furtherance of the object of the Act. A budget is prepared showing the estimated receipts and expenditure. The accounts of the Corporation are audited by -an auditor appointed by the State Government. These provisions in regard to the finance of the Corporation indicate the real role of the Corporation, viz., the agency of the Government in carrying out the purpose and object of the Act which is the development of industries. If in the ultimate analysis there is excess of income over expenditure that will not establish the trading character of the Corporation. There are various departments of the Government which may have excess of income over expenditure. The Corporation is not a Government company within the meaning of section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 nor can the 'Companies Act, 1956 be said to apply to the Corporation because under the provisions contained in section 616 of the Companies Act that Act will apply to a company governed by any special Act except in so far as the provisions of the Companies Act are inconsistent with the provisions of such special Act. The provisions of the Act in the present case in regard to incorporation, functions, powers and dissolution of the Corporation show that the purposes and objects of the Act and the functions and powers of the Corporation are like the warf and weft of the Shri Ramtanu Co-Operative Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 5 August, 1970  8 fabric of development of industries by the State. There are two provisions of the- Act which are not to be found in any trading Corporation. In the first place, the sums payable by any person to the Corporation are recoverable by it under this Act as an arrear of land revenue on the application of the, Corporation. Secondly, on dissolution of the Corporation the assets vest in and the liabilities become enforceable against the State Government. The underlying concept of a trading Corporation is buying and selling. There is no aspect of buying or selling by- the Corporation in the, present case. The Corporation carries out the purposes of the Act, namely, development of industries in the State. The construction of buildings, the establishment of industries by' letting buildings on hire or sale, the acquisition and transfer of land in relation to establishment of industrial estates or development of industrial areas and of setting up of industries cannot be said to be dealing in land or buildings for the obvious reason that the State is carrying out the objects of the Act with the Corporation as an agent insetting up industries in the State. The Act aims at building an industrial town and the Corporation carries out the objects of the Act. The hard core of trading Corporation is its commercial character. Commerce connotes transactions of purchase and sale of commodities, dealing in goods. The forms 'of business transactions may be varied but the real character is buying and selling. The true character of the Corporation in the present case is to act as an architectural agent of the development and growth of indus- trial towns by establishing and developing industrial estates and industrial areas. We are of opinion that the Corporation is not a trading one. Counsel on behalf of the petitioners contended that there was procedural discrimination between the Land Acquisition Act and the Act in the present case. It was said that there was a special procedure designed by the Land Acquisition Act for acquisition of land for the companies whereas in the' present case the State was acquiring land for companies without adopting the procedure of , the Land Acquisition Act. It is to be remembered that the Act in the present case is a special one having the specific and special pur- pose of growth, development and Organisation of industries in the State of Maharashtra. The Act has its own procedure and there is no provision in the Act for acquisition of land for a company as in the case of Land Acquisition Act. In the present case, acquisition under the Act is for the purpose of development of industrial estates or industrial areas by the Corporation or any other purpose in furtherance of the objects of the Act. The policy underlying, the Act is not acquisition of land for any company but for the one. and only purpose of development, Organisation and growth of industrial estates and industrial areas. The Act is designed to have a planned industrial city as opposed to haphazard growth of industrial areas in all parts of the State. The Act is intended to prevent ,.growth of industries in the developed parts of the State. Industries are therefore to be set up in the developing or, new parts of the State where new industrial towns will be brought into existence.. The object of, the Act is to carve out planned areas for industries.. On one side there Will be engineering industries and on the other there will be chemical industries. There will be localisation of industries with the result that the residents and dwellers of towns and cities will not suffer either from the polluted air or obnoxious. chemicals of industries or the dense growth of industries and industrial population, within and near about the residential areas. The Land Acquisition Act is a general Act and that is why there is specific provision for acquisition of land by the, State for public purpose and acquisition of land by the State for companies. The present Act on the other hand is designed the sole purpose of development of industrial areas and industrial estates Shri Ramtanu Co-Operative Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 5 August, 1970  9 and growth and development of industries within the State. Industrial undertakings or persons who are engaged in industries all become entitled to the' facilities on such industrial growth. Under the Land Acquisition Act acquisition is at the instance of and for the benefit of a company whereas under the present Act acquisition is solely by the State for public purposes. The two acts are dissimilar in situations and circumstances. The petitioners contended that the provisions as to compensation were a restriction on the judicial power of the Collector. Section 33 of the Act deals with compensation. The amount of compensation under the Act can be determined by agreement between the State Government and the person to be compensated. Where on the other hand no such agreement can be reached, the State Government shall refer the case to the Collector. That is subsection (3) of section 33 of the Act. The proviso to that sub-section is that no compensation exceeding such amount as the State Government may by general orders specify to b paid for such acquisition shall be determined by the Collector without the previous approval of the State Government or such officer as the State Government may appoint in that behalf. This proviso was construed on behalf of the petitioners to be -a fetter on the judicial powers of the Collector to determine compensation. Subsection (5) of section 33 of ',.he Act states that in determining the amount of compensation the Collector shall be guided by the pro- visions contained in sections 23 and 24 and other relevant provisions of the Land Acquisition Act These provisions indicate that if the Collector will determine an amount higher than what the State Government may by general orders specify, the approval of the State Government will be necessary. There is no ceiling fixed by the Government. Finally, there is an appeal to the Court from the decision of the Collector. The decision of the Court will finally determine the amount of compensation. We are of opinion that there is no restriction on the, powers of the Collector in the matter -of determination of compensation, although the approval of Government may be necessary in the Government interest. All the contentions advanced by the petitioners fail. The petitions 'are dismissed with costs. G.C. Petitions dismissed. Shri Ramtanu Co-Operative Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 5 August, 1970  10