Aher Rama Gova And Ors. vs State Of Gujarat on 9 March, 1979 Equivalent citations: AIR1979SC1567, 1979CRILJ1081, (1979)4SCC500, AIR 1979 SUPREME COURT 1567, 1979 UJ (SC) 536, 1979 CRILR(SC&MP) 513, 1979 (4) SCC 500 Author: S. Murtaza Fazal Ali Bench: A.D. Koshal, S. Murtaza Fazal Ali JUDGMENT S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J. 1. This appeal by special leave is directed against a judgment of the Gujarat High Court convicting the three appellants Uka Gova Rama Gova and Rama Sidi under Section 326/149 to five years rigorous imprisonment. 2. As many as eleven accused were tried by the Trial Court but all of them were acquitted on the finding that the prosecution case was not proved The State, thereupon filed an appeal to the High Court which after reviewing the evidence came to the conclusion that the case against the appellants was fool proof. The central evidence against the accused consists of the testimony of the eye witness P. W. 1 Bai Mini, widow of the deceased Kana Naran. This evidence is corroborated by three dying declarations said to have been made by the deceased. One of the dying declaration which is oral is contained in the F.I.R. itself and the other two were made later on: one to the Magistrates and another to a Police Officer. We have gone through the judgment of the High Court which has made a very cautious approach to this Court would rely on the evidence at PW 3 only if it is corroborated by some other evidence. The High Court relied on Ex. 77 which was recorded by a Taluka Magistrate. It is true that the original dying declaration was not produced before the Court but from the evidence, it is clear that the original was lost and was not available. The Magistrate himself deposed on oath that he had given the original dying declaration to the Head Constable where Head Constable had said that he had made a copy of the same and given it back to the Magistrate. At any rate, it was clearly proved that the original dying declaration was not available. In these circumstances the prosecution was entitled to give secondary evidence which consisted of the statement of the Magistrate as also of the Head Constable who had made a copy from the original and testified that the copy was a correct one. Appearing in support of the appeal Mr. Mulla vehemently criticised the dying declaration on several grounds but the High Court has dealt with these grounds and after hearing Mr. Mulla we are satisfied that the finding of the High Court regarding the veracity of the dying declaration is correct and does not call for any interference. We are also satisfied that the view taken by the High Court is convicting the appellants is fully born out by the evidence on the record and does not need to be set aside by us. Aher Rama Gova And Ors. vs State Of Gujarat on 9 March, 1979  1 3. Lastly, it was urged by Mr. Mulla that the ends of justice do not require that the appellants should be sent back to jail for an occurrence which has taken place ten years ago and after they had been on bail for a pretty long time Having regard to the peculiar circumstances of this case, we feel that it will not be conducive in the interests of justice to send the appellants back to jail and the ends of justice would be fully met if PW 3, Mini Bai the widow of Kara Narain is sufficiently compensated. For these reasons therefore, we would while upholding the conviction of the appellants, reduce the sentence to the period already served. In lieu of the sentence remitted we shall impose a fine of Rs. 3,000/- on each of the appellants. In default one year's rigorous imprisonment. 4. Out of the fine, if realised, the entire amount should be paid to PW 3 Bai Mini, Six month's time is allowed to the accused to pay the fine. The appellants will be discharged from the bail bonds after the fine has been paid. The appeal is dismissed with the aforesaid modifications in the sentence. Aher Rama Gova And Ors. vs State Of Gujarat on 9 March, 1979  2