Dr. M.C. Bindal And Ors. vs R.C. Singh And Ors. on 19 December, 1986 Equivalent citations: AIR1987SC358, 1987(35)BLJR111, [1987(54)FLR72], 1987LABLC467, 1986(2)SCALE1091, 1986SUPP(1)SCC698, 1987(1)UJ124(SC), AIR 1987 SUPREME COURT 358, 1987 LAB. I. C. 467, 1987 (1) UJ (SC) 124, 1987 BLJR 111, (1986) JT 1105 (SC), 1986 SCC (SUPP) 698, 1987 UJ(SC) 1 124, 1987 UPLBEC 160, (1987) 54 FACLR 92, (1987) 1 LAB LN 494, (1987) 1 SCJ 345, (1987) 1 SERVLR 724, (1987) UPLBEC 160, (1987) 1 SUPREME 383, (1987) 13 ALL LR 89, (1987) 2 ATC 929, (1987) 1 CURCC 895, (1987) 1 CURLR 134 Author: A.P. Sen Bench: A.P. Sen, B.C. Ray ORDER A.P. Sen, J. 1 These appeals and the connected writ petition raise common questions and therefore they are disposed of by this common order. We heard learned Counsel for the parties at considerable length and they with their perspicuity, much learning and resource presented their respective points of view. After hearing the arguments lasting over several days, we reserved the judgment. We do not think it is desirable in the public interest to defer the judgment any longer as the post of Food & Drugs Controller is a sensitive one and the incumbent holding the post discharges many important functions and duties. We have therefore decided to deliver this short order indicating the judgment. The reasons therefor shall follow. 2. Having given the matter our anxious consideration and after considering the arguments of the learned Counsel in depth, we have formed the considered opinion that Dr. M.C. Bindal lacked the essential qualifications for appointment to the post of Food & Drugs Controller, State of Uttar Pradesh as prescribed in the advertisement issued by the Commission dated September 30, 1981 inviting applications for appointment to the post. We are also satisfied that the Commission was justified in making an investigation on its own pursuant to the direction contained in the penultimate paragraph of the judgment delivered by the High Court and in withdrawing the candidature of Dr. M.C. Bindal on the ground that he did not possess the minimum qualifications as prescribed. We have also come to the conclusion that in the facts and circumstances of the case, the decision of the Council of Ministers dated July 22, 1986 according its approval to the appointment Dr. M.C. Bindal And Ors. vs R.C. Singh And Ors. on 19 December, 1986  1 of Dr. M.C. Bindal as the Controller of Food & Drugs, Uttar Pradesh on a regular basts, despite the advice of the Commission to the contrary, namely, that he did not possess the requisite five years' experience in Drugs testing etc. and therefore was not eligible for appointment to that post, was not a bona fide exercise of power. We accordingly quash the impugned order passed by the State Government dated April 6, 1983 for the appointment of Dr. M.C. Bindal to be the Food & Drugs Controller, State of Uttar Pradesh as also the subsequent order of the Government dated July 22, 1986 recording its ratification of the appointment of Dr. Bindal to the post of Food & Drugs Controller. We direct that the State Government shall forthwith take necessary steps for appointment of a suitable candidate fully qualified to hold the post of Food & Drugs Controller, through the U.P. Public Service Commission, in accordance with law. We further direct that the State Government shall complete the process of appointment within three months from today. The State Government shall in the meanwhile appoint a member belonging to the Indian Administrative Service to hold the post of Food & Drugs Controller till a regular appointment to the said post is made in consultation with the Public Service Commission. 3. Accordingly, Civil Appeal No. of 1986 preferred by Dr. S.K. Majumdar is allowed while Civil Appeal No. 3797 of 1984 and Writ Petition No. 756 of 1986 filed by Dr. M.C. Bindal and Civil Appeal No. 3798 of 1984 filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh are dismissed, with costs. Dr. M.C. Bindal And Ors. vs R.C. Singh And Ors. on 19 December, 1986  2