1) Charliegone's article was a published research article.I would love to know where "NARTH's" editorial was published, if it even was published.2) NARTH's article DID NOT show any "higher homosexual activity" because of legalized gay marriage.It thoroughly failed to show ANY rise in homosexuality in ANY "gay marriage" country. It showed some studies which were reportedly done in those countries, but that's it.
Label: Non-Sarcastic