so you're admitting that this law will worsen some childrens lives? so lets say they feared violence? do you think it is right for them to face their potential abusers and tell them something they don't want to tell? my point exactly. the first one said plenty. there is nothing wrong with the second. what sources that parents or children may face great bodily harm or injury if this law were not enacted have you provided? in order to pass a law, you need a little more than 'there has been little problems so far'. who is it significantly benefiting and why? oh, god forbid my argument be evolutionary and logical emoticonxrolleyes.
Label: Sarcastic