intros r1 r2[r J]; inversion J; subst; simpl.
- if_tac.
+ subst.
if_tac.
* eauto with *.
* apply join_to_bot_l in RJ; subst;
congruence.
+ if_tac; constructor.
- destruct k; try solve [constructor].
+ apply po_join_sub_sh.
eexists; eauto.
+ apply po_join_sub_sh.
* eexists; eauto.
+ apply po_join_sub_sh.
* eexists; eauto.
- destruct k.
+ if_tac.
* hnf. destruct (perm_of_sh _); apply I.
* apply perm_order''_trans with (perm_of_sh sh3).
-- apply po_join_sub_sh.
++ eexists; eauto.
-- destruct  (perm_of_sh sh3) eqn:E.
++ constructor.
++ pose proof @perm_of_empty_inv _ E; subst.
apply join_to_bot_l in RJ; subst; congruence.
+ if_tac.
* hnf. destruct (perm_of_sh _); apply I.
* apply perm_order''_trans with (perm_of_sh sh1).
-- apply po_join_sub_sh.
++ eexists; eauto.
-- destruct  (perm_of_sh sh1) eqn:E.
++ constructor.
++ pose proof @perm_of_empty_inv _ E; subst; congruence.
+ if_tac.
* hnf. destruct (perm_of_sh _); apply I.
* apply perm_order''_trans with (perm_of_sh sh1).
-- apply po_join_sub_sh.
++ eexists; eauto.
-- destruct  (perm_of_sh sh1) eqn:E.
++ constructor.
++ pose proof @perm_of_empty_inv _ E; subst; congruence.
- destruct k; try constructor.
+ apply po_join_sub_sh; eexists; eauto.
+ apply po_join_sub_sh; eexists; eauto.
+ apply po_join_sub_sh; eexists; eauto.
- constructor.
Qed.

Lemma mem_cohere_sub: forall phi1 phi2 m,
mem_cohere' m phi1 ->
join_sub phi2 phi1 ->
mem_cohere' m phi2.