Ltac SimplFreeVar :=
repeat
match goal with
| H1:(?X1 = ?X2),H2:(?X1 <> ?X2) |- _ =>
elim H2; apply H1
| H1:(?X1 = ?X2),H2:(?X2 <> ?X1) |- _ =>
elim H2; symmetry  in |- *; apply H1
| H1:(?X1 <> ?X1) |- _ =>
elim H1; reflexivity
| H:(In ?X3 (freeVarFormula ?X9 (existH ?X1 ?X2))) |- _ =>
assert (In X3 (list_remove nat eq_nat_dec X1 (freeVarFormula X9 X2)));
[ apply H | clear H ]
| H:(In ?X3 (freeVarFormula ?X9 (fol.existH ?X9 ?X1 ?X2))) |- _ =>
assert (In X3 (list_remove nat eq_nat_dec X1 (freeVarFormula X9 X2)));
[ apply H | clear H ]
| H:(In ?X3 (freeVarFormula ?X9 (forallH ?X1 ?X2))) |- _ =>
assert (In X3 (list_remove nat eq_nat_dec X1 (freeVarFormula X9 X2)));
[ apply H | clear H ]
| H:(In ?X3 (freeVarFormula ?X9 (fol.forallH ?X9 ?X1 ?X2))) |- _ =>
assert (In X3 (list_remove nat eq_nat_dec X1 (freeVarFormula X9 X2)));
[ apply H | clear H ]
| H:(In ?X3 (list_remove nat eq_nat_dec ?X1 (freeVarFormula ?X9 ?X2))) |-
_ =>
assert (In X3 (freeVarFormula X9 X2));
[ eapply In_list_remove1; apply H
| assert (X3 <> X1); [ eapply In_list_remove2; apply H | clear H ] ]
| H:(In ?X3 (freeVarFormula ?X9 (andH ?X1 ?X2))) |- _ =>
assert (In X3 (freeVarFormula X9 X1 ++ freeVarFormula X9 X2));
[ apply H | clear H ]
| H:(In ?X3 (freeVarFormula ?X9 (fol.andH ?X9 ?X1 ?X2))) |- _ =>
assert (In X3 (freeVarFormula X9 X1 ++ freeVarFormula X9 X2));
[ apply H | clear H ]
| H:(In ?X3 (freeVarFormula ?X9 (orH ?X1 ?X2))) |- _ =>
assert (In X3 (freeVarFormula X9 X1 ++ freeVarFormula X9 X2));
[ apply H | clear H ]
| H:(In ?X3 (freeVarFormula ?X9 (fol.orH ?X9 ?X1 ?X2))) |- _ =>
assert (In X3 (freeVarFormula X9 X1 ++ freeVarFormula X9 X2));
[ apply H | clear H ]
| H:(In ?X3 (freeVarFormula ?X9 (impH ?X1 ?X2))) |- _ =>
assert (In X3 (freeVarFormula X9 X1 ++ freeVarFormula X9 X2));
[ apply H | clear H ]
| H:(In ?X3 (freeVarFormula ?X9 (fol.impH ?X9 ?X1 ?X2))) |- _ =>
assert (In X3 (freeVarFormula X9 X1 ++ freeVarFormula X9 X2));
[ apply H | clear H ]
| H:(In ?X3 (freeVarFormula ?X9 (notH ?X1))) |- _ =>
assert (In X3 (freeVarFormula X9 X1)); [ apply H | clear H ]
| H:(In ?X3 (freeVarFormula ?X9 (fol.notH ?X9 ?X1))) |- _ =>
assert (In X3 (freeVarFormula X9 X1)); [ apply H | clear H ]
| H:(In _ (_ ++ _)) |- _ =>
induction (in_app_or _ _ _ H); clear H
| H:(In _ (freeVarFormula ?X9 (substituteFormula ?X9 ?X1 ?X2 ?X3))) |- _
=>
induction (freeVarSubFormula3 _ _ _ _ _ H); clear H
| H:(In _ (freeVarFormula ?X9 (LT ?X1 ?X2))) |- _ =>
rewrite freeVarLT in H
| H:(In _ (freeVarTerm ?X9 (LNT.natToTerm _))) |- _ =>
elim (LNT.closedNatToTerm _ _ H)
| H:(In _ (freeVarTerm ?X9 (natToTerm _))) |- _ =>
elim (closedNatToTerm _ _ H)
| H:(In _ (freeVarTerm ?X9 Zero)) |- _ =>
elim H
| H:(In _ (freeVarTerm ?X9 (Succ _))) |- _ =>
rewrite freeVarSucc in H
| H:(In _ (freeVarTerm ?X9 (var _))) |- _ =>
simpl in H; decompose sum H; clear H
| H:(In _ (freeVarTerm ?X9 (LNT.var _))) |- _ =>
simpl in H; decompose sum H; clear H
| H:(In _ (freeVarTerm ?X9 (fol.var ?X9 _))) |- _ =>
simpl in H; decompose sum H; clear H
end.
Section code_SysPrf.
Variable L : Language.
Variable codeF : Functions L -> nat.
Variable codeR : Relations L -> nat.
Variable codeArityF : nat -> nat.
Variable codeArityR : nat -> nat.
Hypothesis codeArityFIsPR : isPR 1 codeArityF.
Hypothesis
codeArityFIsCorrect1 :
forall f : Functions L, codeArityF (codeF f) = S (arity L (inr _ f)).
Hypothesis
codeArityFIsCorrect2 :
forall n : nat, codeArityF n <> 0 -> exists f : Functions L, codeF f = n.
Hypothesis codeArityRIsPR : isPR 1 codeArityR.
Hypothesis
codeArityRIsCorrect1 :
forall r : Relations L, codeArityR (codeR r) = S (arity L (inl _ r)).
Hypothesis
codeArityRIsCorrect2 :
forall n : nat, codeArityR n <> 0 -> exists r : Relations L, codeR r = n.
Hypothesis codeFInj : forall f g : Functions L, codeF f = codeF g -> f = g.
Hypothesis codeRInj : forall R S : Relations L, codeR R = codeR S -> R = S.
Section LNN.
Variable T : System.
Hypothesis TextendsNN : Included _ NN T.
Variable U : fol.System L.
Variable fU : Formula.
Variable v0 : nat.
Hypothesis freeVarfU : forall v : nat, In v (freeVarFormula LNN fU) -> v = v0.
Hypothesis
expressU1 :
forall f : fol.Formula L,
mem _ U f ->
SysPrf T
(substituteFormula LNN fU v0 (natToTerm (codeFormula L codeF codeR f))).
Hypothesis
expressU2 :
forall f : fol.Formula L,
~ mem _ U f ->
SysPrf T
(notH
(substituteFormula LNN fU v0
(natToTerm (codeFormula L codeF codeR f)))).
Definition codeSysPrf : Formula :=
let nv := newVar (2 :: 1 :: 0 :: v0 :: nil) in
existH nv
(andH
(substituteFormula LNN
(substituteFormula LNN
(primRecFormula 2
(proj1_sig
(checkPrfIsPR L codeF codeR codeArityF codeArityR
codeArityFIsPR codeArityRIsPR))) 0
(Succ (var nv))) 2 (var 0))
(forallH (S nv)
(impH (LT (var (S nv)) (var nv))
(orH
(substituteFormula LNN
(substituteFormula LNN
(substituteFormula LNN
(primRecFormula 2 (proj1_sig codeInIsPR)) 2
(var (S nv))) 1 (var nv)) 0 Zero)
(substituteFormula LNN fU v0 (var (S nv))))))).

Lemma codeSysPrfCorrect2 :
forall (f : fol.Formula L) (A : fol.Formulas L),
(exists g : fol.Formula L, In g A /\ ~ mem _ U g) ->
forall p : Prf L A f,
SysPrf T
(notH
(substituteFormula LNN
(substituteFormula LNN codeSysPrf 0
(natToTerm (codeFormula L codeF codeR f))) 1
(natToTerm (codePrf L codeF codeR A f p)))).