(** We need to show that, in the simulation diagram, we cannot take infinitely many Mach transitions that correspond to zero transitions on the PPC side.  Actually, all Mach transitions correspond to at least one PPC transition, except the transition from [Machsem.Returnstate] to [Machsem.State]. So, the following integer measure will suffice to rule out the unwanted behaviour. *)
Definition measure (s: Mach.state) : nat :=
match s with
| Mach.State _ _ _ _ _ _ => 0%nat
| Mach.Callstate _ _ _ _ => 0%nat
| Mach.Returnstate _ _ _ => 1%nat
end.
Remark preg_of_not_GPR11: forall r, negb (mreg_eq r R11) = true -> IR GPR11 <> preg_of r.
(** This is the simulation diagram.  We prove it by case analysis on the Mach transition. *)

(* Specifications: *)
Theorem step_simulation:
forall S1 t S2, Mach.step return_address_offset ge S1 t S2 ->
forall S1' (MS: match_states S1 S1') (WF: wf_state ge S1),
(exists S2', plus step tge S1' t S2' /\ match_states S2 S2')
\/ (measure S2 < measure S1 /\ t = E0 /\ match_states S2 S1')%nat.
Lemma transf_initial_states:
forall st1, Mach.initial_state prog st1 ->
exists st2, Asm.initial_state tprog st2 /\ match_states st1 st2.
Lemma transf_final_states:
forall st1 st2 r,
match_states st1 st2 -> Mach.final_state st1 r -> Asm.final_state st2 r.
Theorem transf_program_correct:
forward_simulation (Mach.semantics return_address_offset prog) (Asm.semantics tprog).