Proof with auto with typeclass_instances.
intros Hp x Hx.
assert (Hx': (x <> 0)%R).
intros T; contradict Hx; rewrite T, Rabs_R0.
apply Rlt_not_le, bpow_gt_0.
apply Rlt_le_trans with (ulp beta fexp x)%R.
now apply error_lt_ulp.
rewrite ulp_neq_0; trivial.
unfold canonic_exp.
destruct (ln_beta beta x) as (ex, He).
simpl.
specialize (He Hx').
assert (He': (emin < ex)%Z).
apply (lt_bpow beta).
apply Rle_lt_trans with (2 := proj2 He).
exact Hx.
apply Rle_trans with (bpow (-p + 1) * bpow (ex - 1))%R.
rewrite <- bpow_plus.
apply bpow_le.
generalize (Hmin ex).
omega.
apply Rmult_le_compat_l.
apply bpow_ge_0.
generalize He.
apply round_abs_abs...
clear rnd valid_rnd x Hx Hx' He.
intros rnd valid_rnd x _ Hx.
rewrite <- (round_generic beta fexp rnd (bpow (ex - 1))).
now apply round_le.
apply generic_format_bpow.
ring_simplify (ex - 1 + 1)%Z.
generalize (Hmin ex).
omega.
Qed.

(* Specifications: *)
Theorem relative_error_round_F2R_emin :
(0 < p)%Z ->
forall m, let x := F2R (Float beta m emin) in
(x <> 0)%R ->
(Rabs (round beta fexp rnd x - x) < bpow (-p + 1) * Rabs (round beta fexp rnd x))%R.