Section CORRECTNESS_EXPR.
Variable sp: val.
Variable e: env.
Variable m: mem.
(** The proof of semantic preservation for the translation of expressions is a simulation argument based on diagrams of the following form: << I /\ P e, le, m, a ------------- State cs code sp ns rs tm ||                      | ||                      |* ||                      | \/                      v e, le, m, v ------------ State cs code sp nd rs' tm' I /\ Q >> where [tr_expr code map pr a ns nd rd] is assumed to hold. The left vertical arrow represents an evaluation of the expression [a]. The right vertical arrow represents the execution of zero, one or several instructions in the generated RTL flow graph [code].  The invariant [I] is the agreement between Cminor environments and RTL register environment, as captured by [match_envs].  The precondition [P] includes the well-formedness of the compilation environment [mut].  The postconditions [Q] state that in the final register environment [rs'], register [rd] contains value [v], and the registers in the set of preserved registers [pr] are unchanged, as are the registers in the codomain of [map].  We formalize this simulation property by the following predicate parameterized by the CminorSel evaluation (left arrow).  *)
Definition transl_expr_prop
(le: letenv) (a: expr) (v: val) : Prop :=
forall j tm cs f map pr ns nd rd rs dst
(*NEW:*)(PG: meminj_preserves_globals ge j) sp' (SP: sp_preserved j sp sp')  (MWF: map_wf map) (TE: tr_expr f.(fn_code) map pr a ns nd rd dst) (ME: match_env j map e le rs) (EXT: Mem.inject j m tm), exists rs', exists tm', corestep_star rtl_eff_sem tge (RTL_State cs f sp' ns rs) tm (RTL_State cs f sp' nd rs') tm' /\ match_env j map (set_optvar dst v e) le rs' /\ val_inject j v rs'#rd /\ (forall r, In r pr -> rs'#r = rs#r) /\ Mem.inject j m tm' /\ tm=tm'.  Definition transl_exprlist_prop (le: letenv) (al: exprlist) (vl: list val) : Prop := forall j tm cs f map pr ns nd rl rs (*NEW:*)(PG: meminj_preserves_globals ge j) sp' (SP: sp_preserved j sp sp')  (MWF: map_wf map) (TE: tr_exprlist f.(fn_code) map pr al ns nd rl) (ME: match_env j map e le rs) (EXT: Mem.inject j m tm), exists rs', exists tm', corestep_star rtl_eff_sem tge (RTL_State cs f sp' ns rs) tm (RTL_State cs f sp' nd rs') tm' /\ match_env j map e le rs' /\ val_list_inject j vl rs'##rl /\ (forall r, In r pr -> rs'#r = rs#r) /\ Mem.inject j m tm' /\ tm=tm'.  Definition transl_condexpr_prop (le: letenv) (a: condexpr) (v: bool) : Prop := forall j tm cs f map pr ns ntrue nfalse rs (*NEW:*)(PG: meminj_preserves_globals ge j) sp' (SP: sp_preserved j sp sp')  (MWF: map_wf map) (TE: tr_condition f.(fn_code) map pr a ns ntrue nfalse) (ME: match_env j map e le rs) (EXT: Mem.inject j m tm), exists rs', exists tm', corestep_plus rtl_eff_sem tge (RTL_State cs f sp' ns rs) tm (RTL_State cs f sp' (if v then ntrue else nfalse) rs') tm' /\ match_env j map e le rs' /\ (forall r, In r pr -> rs'#r = rs#r) /\ Mem.inject j m tm' /\ tm=tm'.  (** The correctness of the translation is a huge induction over the Cminor evaluation derivation for the source program.  To keep the proof manageable, we put each case of the proof in a separate lemma.  There is one lemma for each Cminor evaluation rule. It takes as hypotheses the premises of the Cminor evaluation rule, plus the induction hypotheses, that is, the [transl_expr_prop], etc, corresponding to the evaluations of sub-expressions or sub-statements. *)

Lemma transl_expr_Econdition_correct:
forall (le : letenv) (a: condexpr) (ifso ifnot : expr)
(va : bool) (v : val),
eval_condexpr ge sp e m le a va ->
transl_condexpr_prop le a va ->
eval_expr ge sp e m le (if va then ifso else ifnot) v ->
transl_expr_prop le (if va then ifso else ifnot) v ->
transl_expr_prop le (Econdition a ifso ifnot) v.