From Undecidability.L Require Export Prelim.ARS Prelim.MoreBase.
From Undecidability.Shared.Libs.PSL Require Export Base Bijection.
From Undecidability.L Require Export L.
Hint Constructors ARS.star : cbv.
(* * The call-by-value lambda calculus L *)
(* ** Syntax   *)
Notation "'#' v" := (var v) (at level 1).
(* Notation "(λ  s )" := (lam s) (right associativity, at level 0).  *)
Instance term_eq_dec : eq_dec term.
Hint Resolve lambda_lam : core.
Instance lambda_dec s : dec (lambda s).
Instance bound_dec k s : dec (bound k s).
Proof with try ((left; econstructor; try lia; tauto) || (right; inversion 1; try lia; tauto)).
revert k; induction s; intros k.
- destruct (le_lt_dec n k) as [Hl | Hl]... destruct (le_lt_eq_dec _ _ Hl)...
- destruct (IHs1 k), (IHs2 k)...
- induction k.
+ destruct (IHs 1)...
+ destruct (IHs (S (S k)))...
Defined.
Instance closed_dec s : dec (closed s).
Proof with try tauto.
intros cls_s. induction s.
- eapply closed_dcl in cls_s. inv cls_s. lia.
- eapply closed_app in cls_s. destruct IHs1 as [[C [t A]] | A], IHs2 as [[D [t' B]] | B]...
+ right. subst. eexists. eauto.
+ right; subst. firstorder; eexists. eapply stepAppR. eassumption.
+ right; subst. firstorder; eexists. eapply stepAppL. eassumption.
+ right. subst. firstorder. eexists. eapply stepAppR. eassumption.
- left. split. eassumption. firstorder.
Qed.
Goal forall s, closed s -> ((~ exists t, s ≻ t) <-> proc s).
(* Properties of the reduction relation *)
Proof with repeat inv_step; eauto using step.
intros s; induction s; intros t1 t2 step_s_t1 step_s_t2; try now inv step_s_t2.
inv step_s_t1.
- inv step_s_t2; try eauto; inv_step.
- inv step_s_t2...
+ destruct (IHs2 _ _ H2 H3).
* left. congruence.
* right. destruct H as [u [A B]]...
+ right...
- inv step_s_t2...
+ right...
+ destruct (IHs1 _ _ H2 H3).
* left. congruence.
* right. destruct H as [u [A B]]...
Qed.
Notation "s '>(' l ')' t" := (pow step l s t) (at level 50, format "s  '>(' l ')'  t").
Arguments pow: simpl never.

Lemma confluence : confluent step.