(** Administrative lemmas for Fsub.  Authors: Brian Aydemir and Arthur Chargu\'eraud, with help from Aaron Bohannon, Jeffrey Vaughan, and Dimitrios Vytiniotis.  This file contains a number of administrative lemmas that we require for proving type-safety.  The lemmas mainly concern the relations [wf_typ] and [wf_env].  This file also contains regularity lemmas, which show that various relations hold only for locally closed terms.  In addition to being necessary to complete the proof of type-safety, these lemmas help demonstrate that our definitions are correct; they would be worth proving even if they are unneeded for any "real" proofs.  Table of contents: - #<a href="##wft">Properties of wf_typ</a># - #<a href="##oktwft">Properties of wf_env and wf_typ</a># - #<a href="##okt">Properties of wf_env</a># - #<a href="##subst">Properties of substitution</a># - #<a href="##regularity">Regularity lemmas</a># - #<a href="##auto">Automation</a># *)
Require Export Fsub.Fsub_LetSum_Infrastructure.
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(** * #<a name="wft"></a># Properties of [wf_typ] *)
(** If a type is well-formed in an environment, then it is locally closed. *)
(** The remaining properties are analogous to the properties that we need to show for the subtyping and typing relations. *)
Proof with simpl_env; eauto.
intros T E F G Hwf_typ Hk.
remember (G ++ E) as F'.
generalize dependent G.
induction Hwf_typ; intros G Hok Heq; subst...
Case "type_all".
pick fresh Y and apply wf_typ_all...
rewrite <- app_assoc.
apply H0...
Qed.
Proof with simpl_env; eauto.
intros V U T E F X Hwf_typ.
remember (F ++ X ~ bind_sub V ++ E) as G.
generalize dependent F.
induction Hwf_typ; intros F Heq; subst...
Case "wf_typ_var".
analyze_binds H...
Case "typ_all".
pick fresh Y and apply wf_typ_all...
rewrite <- app_assoc.
apply H0...
Qed.
Proof with simpl_env; eauto.
intros E F x U T H.
remember (F ++ x ~ bind_typ U ++ E) as G.
generalize dependent F.
induction H; intros F Heq; subst...
Case "wf_typ_var".
analyze_binds H...
Case "wf_typ_all".
pick fresh Y and apply wf_typ_all...
rewrite <- app_assoc.
apply H1...
Qed.
Proof with simpl_env; eauto using wf_typ_weaken_head, type_from_wf_typ.
intros F Q E Z P T WT WP.
remember (F ++ Z ~ bind_sub Q ++ E) as G.
generalize dependent F.
induction WT; intros F EQ Ok; subst; simpl subst_tt...
Case "wf_typ_var".
destruct (X == Z); subst...
SCase "X <> Z".
analyze_binds H...
apply (wf_typ_var (subst_tt Z P U))...
Case "wf_typ_all".
pick fresh Y and apply wf_typ_all...
rewrite subst_tt_open_tt_var...
rewrite_env (map (subst_tb Z P) (Y ~ bind_sub T1 ++ F) ++ E).
apply H0...
Qed.
Proof with simpl_env; eauto.
intros E U T1 T2 Ok WA WU.
inversion WA; subst.
pick fresh X.
rewrite (subst_tt_intro X)...
rewrite_env (map (subst_tb X U) empty ++ E).
eapply wf_typ_subst_tb...
Qed.
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(** * #<a name="oktwft"></a># Properties of [wf_env] and [wf_typ] *)
(** We add [uniq_from_wf_env] as a hint here since it helps blur the distinction between [wf_env] and [uniq] in proofs.  The lemmas in the MetatheoryEnv library use [uniq], whereas here we naturally have (or can easily show) the stronger [wf_env].  Thus, [uniq_from_wf_env] serves as a bridge that allows us to use the environments library. *)
Hint Resolve uniq_from_wf_env : core.
Proof with auto using wf_typ_weaken_head.
induction 1; intros J; analyze_binds J...
injection BindsTacVal; intros; subst...
Qed.
(* ********************************************************************** *)
(** * #<a name="okt"></a># Properties of [wf_env] *)
(** These properties are analogous to the properties that we need to show for the subtyping and typing relations. *)

Lemma wf_env_narrowing : forall V E F U X,
wf_env (F ++ X ~ bind_sub V ++ E) ->
wf_typ E U ->
wf_env (F ++ X ~ bind_sub U ++ E).