Section OVERLAP.
(** We consider a parallel move problem [mu] that satisfies the following conditions, which are stronger, overlap-aware variants of the [move_no_temp mu] and [is_mill mu] conditions used previously. *)
Variable mu: moves.
(** Sources and destinations are disjoint from all temporary registers. *)
Hypothesis mu_no_temporaries_src:
forall s, In s (srcs mu) -> disjoint_temps s.
Hypothesis mu_no_temporaries_dst:
forall d, In d (dests mu) -> disjoint_temps d.
(** Destinations are pairwise disjoint. *)
Hypothesis mu_dest_pairwise_disjoint:
pairwise_disjoint (dests mu).
(** Sources and destinations do not partially overlap. *)
Hypothesis mu_src_dst_no_overlap:
forall s d, In s (srcs mu) -> In d (dests mu) -> no_overlap s d.
(** Distinct temporaries do not partially overlap. *)
Hypothesis temps_no_overlap:
forall t1 t2, is_temp t1 -> is_temp t2 -> no_overlap t1 t2.
(** The following lemmas show that [mu] is a windmill and does not contain temporary registers. *)
(** We define the ``adherence'' of the problem [mu] as the set of registers that partially overlap with one of the registers possibly assigned by the parallel move: destinations and temporaries. Again, we define the complement of the ``adherence'' set, which is more convenient for Coq reasoning. *)
Definition no_adherence (r: reg) : Prop :=
forall x, In x (dests mu) \/ is_temp x -> no_overlap x r.
(** As a consequence of the hypotheses on [mu], none of the destination registers, source registers, and temporaries belong to the adherence. *)

Lemma no_overlap_pairwise:
forall r1 r2 m, pairwise_disjoint m -> In r1 m -> In r2 m -> no_overlap r1 r2.