Section CMCONSTR.
Variable ge: genv.
Variable sp: val.
Variable e: env.
Variable m: mem.
(** We now show that the code generated by "smart constructor" functions such as [SelectOp.notint] behaves as expected.  Continuing the [notint] example, we show that if the expression [e] evaluates to some integer value [Vint n], then [SelectOp.notint e] evaluates to a value [Vint (Int.not n)] which is indeed the integer negation of the value of [e].  All proofs follow a common pattern: - Reasoning by case over the result of the classification functions (such as [add_match] for integer addition), gathering additional information on the shape of the argument expressions in the non-default cases. - Inversion of the evaluations of the arguments, exploiting the additional information thus gathered. - Equational reasoning over the arithmetic operations performed, using the lemmas from the [Int] and [Float] modules. - Construction of an evaluation derivation for the expression returned by the smart constructor. *)
Definition unary_constructor_sound (cstr: expr -> expr) (sem: val -> val) : Prop :=
forall le a x,
eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (cstr a) v /\ Val.lessdef (sem x) v.
Definition binary_constructor_sound (cstr: expr -> expr -> expr) (sem: val -> val -> val) : Prop :=
forall le a x b y,
eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
eval_expr ge sp e m le b y ->
exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (cstr a b) v /\ Val.lessdef (sem x y) v.
Remark eval_same_expr:
forall a1 a2 le v1 v2,
same_expr_pure a1 a2 = true ->
eval_expr ge sp e m le a1 v1 ->
eval_expr ge sp e m le a2 v2 ->
a1 = a2 /\ v1 = v2.
Remark int_add_sub_eq:
forall x y z, Int.add x y = z -> Int.sub z x = y.

Theorem eval_modu_base:
forall le a b x y z,
eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
eval_expr ge sp e m le b y ->
Val.modu x y = Some z ->
exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (modu_base a b) v /\ Val.lessdef z v.