Section Fold_With_Restriction.
Variable R : A -> A -> Prop.
Hypothesis R_sym : Symmetric R.
Hypothesis R_compat : Proper (eqA==>eqA==>iff) R.
(*  (** [ForallOrdPairs R] is compatible with [equivlistA] over the lists without duplicates, as long as the relation [R] is symmetric and compatible with [eqA]. To prove this fact, we use an auxiliary notion: "forall distinct pairs, ...". *)
Definition ForallNeqPairs :=
ForallPairs (fun a b => ~eqA a b -> R a b).
(** [ForallOrdPairs] and [ForallNeqPairs] are related, but not completely equivalent. For proving one implication, we need to know that the list has no duplicated elements... *)
(** ... and for proving the other implication, we need to be able to reverse relation [R]. *)
*)
(** Compatibility of [ForallOrdPairs] with respect to [inclA]. *)
(** Two-argument functions that allow to reorder their arguments. *)
Definition transpose (f : A -> B -> B) :=
forall (x y : A) (z : B), eqB (f x (f y z)) (f y (f x z)).
(** A version of transpose with restriction on where it should hold *)
Definition transpose_restr (R : A -> A -> Prop)(f : A -> B -> B) :=
forall (x y : A) (z : B), R x y -> eqB (f x (f y z)) (f y (f x z)).
Variable TraR :transpose_restr R f.
End Fold_With_Restriction.
(** we now state similar results, but without restriction on transpose. *)
Variable Tra :transpose f.

Lemma fold_right_equivlistA :
forall s s', NoDupA s -> NoDupA s' ->
equivlistA s s' -> eqB (fold_right f i s) (fold_right f i s').