(** * Useful lemmas and tactics *)

(** The following are trivial lemmas and custom tactics that help
  perform backward (inversion) and forward reasoning over the evaluation
  of operator applications. *)

Ltac EvalOp := eapply eval_Eop; eauto with evalexpr.Ltac InvEval2 :=
  match goal with
  | [ H: (eval_operation _ _ _ nil _ = Some _) |- _ ] =>
      simpl in H; inv H
  | [ H: (eval_operation _ _ _ (_ :: nil) _ = Some _) |- _ ] =>
      simpl in H; FuncInv
  | [ H: (eval_operation _ _ _ (_ :: _ :: nil) _ = Some _) |- _ ] =>
      simpl in H; FuncInv
  | [ H: (eval_operation _ _ _ (_ :: _ :: _ :: nil) _ = Some _) |- _ ] =>
      simpl in H; FuncInv
  | _ =>
      idtac
  end.Ltac InvEval := InvEval1; InvEval2; InvEval2.Ltac TrivialExists :=
  match goal with
  | [ |- exists v, _ /\ Val.lessdef ?a v ] => exists a; split; [EvalOp | auto]
  end.(** We now show that the code generated by "smart constructor" functions
  such as [Selection.notint] behaves as expected.  Continuing the
  [notint] example, we show that if the expression [e]
  evaluates to some integer value [Vint n], then [Selection.notint e]
  evaluates to a value [Vint (Int.not n)] which is indeed the integer
  negation of the value of [e].

  All proofs follow a common pattern:
- Reasoning by case over the result of the classification functions
  (such as [add_match] for integer addition), gathering additional
  information on the shape of the argument expressions in the non-default
  cases.
- Inversion of the evaluations of the arguments, exploiting the additional
  information thus gathered.
- Equational reasoning over the arithmetic operations performed,
  using the lemmas from the [Int] and [Float] modules.
- Construction of an evaluation derivation for the expression returned
  by the smart constructor.
*)

Definition unary_constructor_sound (cstr: expr -> expr) (sem: val -> val) : Prop :=
  forall le a x,
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
  exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (cstr a) v /\ Val.lessdef (sem x) v.Definition binary_constructor_sound (cstr: expr -> expr -> expr) (sem: val -> val -> val) : Prop :=
  forall le a x b y,
  eval_expr ge sp e m le a x ->
  eval_expr ge sp e m le b y ->
  exists v, eval_expr ge sp e m le (cstr a b) v /\ Val.lessdef (sem x y) v.

Theorem eval_addressing: forall le chunk a v b ofs, eval_expr ge sp e m le a v -> v = Vptr b ofs -> match addressing chunk a with (mode, args) => exists vl, eval_exprlist ge sp e m le args vl /\ eval_addressing ge sp mode vl = Some v end.