(** The proof of semantic preservation is a simulation argument
  based on "option" diagrams of the following form:
<<
                 n
       st1 --------------- st2
        |                   |
       t|                   |t or (? and n' < n)
        |                   |
        v                   v
       st1'--------------- st2'
                 n'
>>
  The left vertical arrow represents a transition in the
  original RTL code.  The top horizontal bar is the [match_states]
  invariant between the initial state [st1] in the original RTL code
  and an initial state [st2] in the transformed code.
  This invariant expresses that all code fragments appearing in [st2]
  are obtained by [transf_code] transformation of the corresponding
  fragments in [st1].  Moreover, the state [st1] must match its compile-time
  approximations at the current program point.
  These two parts of the diagram are the hypotheses.  In conclusions,
  we want to prove the other two parts: the right vertical arrow,
  which is a transition in the transformed RTL code, and the bottom
  horizontal bar, which means that the [match_state] predicate holds
  between the final states [st1'] and [st2']. *)

Inductive match_stackframes: stackframe -> stackframe -> Prop :=
   match_stackframe_intro:
      forall res sp pc rs f rs' cu,
      linkorder cu prog ->
      regs_lessdef rs rs' ->
    match_stackframes
        (Stackframe res f sp pc rs)
        (Stackframe res (transf_function (romem_for cu) f) sp pc rs').(** The proof of semantic preservation is a simulation argument
  based on "option" diagrams of the following form:
<<
                 n
       st1 --------------- st2
        |                   |
       t|                   |t or (? and n' < n)
        |                   |
        v                   v
       st1'--------------- st2'
                 n'
>>
  The left vertical arrow represents a transition in the
  original RTL code.  The top horizontal bar is the [match_states]
  invariant between the initial state [st1] in the original RTL code
  and an initial state [st2] in the transformed code.
  This invariant expresses that all code fragments appearing in [st2]
  are obtained by [transf_code] transformation of the corresponding
  fragments in [st1].  Moreover, the state [st1] must match its compile-time
  approximations at the current program point.
  These two parts of the diagram are the hypotheses.  In conclusions,
  we want to prove the other two parts: the right vertical arrow,
  which is a transition in the transformed RTL code, and the bottom
  horizontal bar, which means that the [match_state] predicate holds
  between the final states [st1'] and [st2']. *)

Inductive match_stackframes: stackframe -> stackframe -> Prop :=
   match_stackframe_intro:
      forall res sp pc rs f rs' cu,
      linkorder cu prog ->
      regs_lessdef rs rs' ->
    match_stackframes
        (Stackframe res f sp pc rs)
        (Stackframe res (transf_function (romem_for cu) f) sp pc rs').Inductive match_states: nat -> state -> state -> Prop :=
  | match_states_intro:
      forall s sp pc rs m f s' pc' rs' m' cu n
           (LINK: linkorder cu prog)
           (STACKS: list_forall2 match_stackframes s s')
           (PC: match_pc f rs m n pc pc')
           (REGS: regs_lessdef rs rs')
           (MEM: Mem.extends m m'),
      match_states n (State s f sp pc rs m)
                    (State s' (transf_function (romem_for cu) f) sp pc' rs' m')
  | match_states_call:
      forall s f args m s' args' m' cu
           (LINK: linkorder cu prog)
           (STACKS: list_forall2 match_stackframes s s')
           (ARGS: Val.lessdef_list args args')
           (MEM: Mem.extends m m'),
      match_states O (Callstate s f args m)
                     (Callstate s' (transf_fundef (romem_for cu) f) args' m')
  | match_states_return:
      forall s v m s' v' m'
           (STACKS: list_forall2 match_stackframes s s')
           (RES: Val.lessdef v v')
           (MEM: Mem.extends m m'),
      list_forall2 match_stackframes s s' ->
      match_states O (Returnstate s v m)
                     (Returnstate s' v' m').Inductive match_states: nat -> state -> state -> Prop :=
  | match_states_intro:
      forall s sp pc rs m f s' pc' rs' m' cu n
           (LINK: linkorder cu prog)
           (STACKS: list_forall2 match_stackframes s s')
           (PC: match_pc f rs m n pc pc')
           (REGS: regs_lessdef rs rs')
           (MEM: Mem.extends m m'),
      match_states n (State s f sp pc rs m)
                    (State s' (transf_function (romem_for cu) f) sp pc' rs' m')
  | match_states_call:
      forall s f args m s' args' m' cu
           (LINK: linkorder cu prog)
           (STACKS: list_forall2 match_stackframes s s')
           (ARGS: Val.lessdef_list args args')
           (MEM: Mem.extends m m'),
      match_states O (Callstate s f args m)
                     (Callstate s' (transf_fundef (romem_for cu) f) args' m')
  | match_states_return:
      forall s v m s' v' m'
           (STACKS: list_forall2 match_stackframes s s')
           (RES: Val.lessdef v v')
           (MEM: Mem.extends m m'),
      list_forall2 match_stackframes s s' ->
      match_states O (Returnstate s v m)
                     (Returnstate s' v' m').Inductive match_states: nat -> state -> state -> Prop :=
  | match_states_intro:
      forall s sp pc rs m f s' pc' rs' m' cu n
           (LINK: linkorder cu prog)
           (STACKS: list_forall2 match_stackframes s s')
           (PC: match_pc f rs m n pc pc')
           (REGS: regs_lessdef rs rs')
           (MEM: Mem.extends m m'),
      match_states n (State s f sp pc rs m)
                    (State s' (transf_function (romem_for cu) f) sp pc' rs' m')
  | match_states_call:
      forall s f args m s' args' m' cu
           (LINK: linkorder cu prog)
           (STACKS: list_forall2 match_stackframes s s')
           (ARGS: Val.lessdef_list args args')
           (MEM: Mem.extends m m'),
      match_states O (Callstate s f args m)
                     (Callstate s' (transf_fundef (romem_for cu) f) args' m')
  | match_states_return:
      forall s v m s' v' m'
           (STACKS: list_forall2 match_stackframes s s')
           (RES: Val.lessdef v v')
           (MEM: Mem.extends m m'),
      list_forall2 match_stackframes s s' ->
      match_states O (Returnstate s v m)
                     (Returnstate s' v' m').Inductive match_states: nat -> state -> state -> Prop :=
  | match_states_intro:
      forall s sp pc rs m f s' pc' rs' m' cu n
           (LINK: linkorder cu prog)
           (STACKS: list_forall2 match_stackframes s s')
           (PC: match_pc f rs m n pc pc')
           (REGS: regs_lessdef rs rs')
           (MEM: Mem.extends m m'),
      match_states n (State s f sp pc rs m)
                    (State s' (transf_function (romem_for cu) f) sp pc' rs' m')
  | match_states_call:
      forall s f args m s' args' m' cu
           (LINK: linkorder cu prog)
           (STACKS: list_forall2 match_stackframes s s')
           (ARGS: Val.lessdef_list args args')
           (MEM: Mem.extends m m'),
      match_states O (Callstate s f args m)
                     (Callstate s' (transf_fundef (romem_for cu) f) args' m')
  | match_states_return:
      forall s v m s' v' m'
           (STACKS: list_forall2 match_stackframes s s')
           (RES: Val.lessdef v v')
           (MEM: Mem.extends m m'),
      list_forall2 match_stackframes s s' ->
      match_states O (Returnstate s v m)
                     (Returnstate s' v' m').

Lemma match_states_succ: forall s f sp pc rs m s' rs' m' cu, linkorder cu prog -> list_forall2 match_stackframes s s' -> regs_lessdef rs rs' -> Mem.extends m m' -> match_states O (State s f sp pc rs m) (State s' (transf_function (romem_for cu) f) sp pc rs' m').