Definition tc_formals (formals: list (ident * type)) : environ -> Prop :=
     fun rho => tc_vals (map (@snd _ _) formals) (map (fun xt => (eval_id (fst xt) rho)) formals).(*This definition, and lemma close_precondition_i below, could be moved to general_seplog*)
Program Definition close_precondition (params vars: list (ident * type)) (P: environ -> pred rmap) (rho: environ) : pred rmap :=
 fun phi =>
   exists ve', exists te',
   (forall i, In i (map (@fst _ _) params) -> Map.get te' i = Map.get (te_of rho) i) /\
   (forall i, In i (map (@fst _ _) vars) \/ Map.get ve' i = Map.get (ve_of rho) i) /\
   app_pred (P (mkEnviron (ge_of rho) ve' te')) phi.Definition precondition_closed (f: function) {A: TypeTree}
  (P: forall ts, dependent_type_functor_rec ts (AssertTT A) mpred) : Prop :=
 forall ts x,
  closed_wrt_vars (not_a_param (fn_params f)) (P ts x) /\
  closed_wrt_lvars (is_a_local (fn_vars f)) (P ts x).Definition ret_temp : ident := 1%positive.Definition get_result1 (ret: ident) (rho: environ) : environ :=
   make_args (ret_temp::nil) (eval_id ret rho :: nil) rho.Definition get_result (ret: option ident) : environ -> environ :=
 match ret with
 | None => make_args nil nil
 | Some x => get_result1 x
 end.Definition funassert (Delta: tycontext): assert := funspecs_assert (glob_specs Delta).(* Unfortunately, we need core_load in the interface as well as address_mapsto,
  because the converse of 'mapsto_core_load' lemma is not true.  The reason is
  that core_load could imply partial ownership of the four bytes of the word
  using different shares that don't have a common core, whereas address_mapsto
  requires the same share on all four bytes. *)
(*
Record ret_assert : Type := {
 RA_normal: assert;
 RA_break: assert;
 RA_continue: assert;
 RA_return: option val -> assert
}.
*)
Definition proj_ret_assert (Q: ret_assert) (ek: exitkind) (vl: option val) : assert :=
 match ek with
 | EK_normal => RA_normal Q
 | EK_break => RA_break Q
 | EK_continue => RA_continue Q
 | EK_return => RA_return Q vl
 end.(* Definition ret_assert := exitkind -> option val -> assert. *)

Definition overridePost  (Q: assert)  (R: ret_assert) :=
 match R with 
  {| RA_normal := _; RA_break := b; RA_continue := c; RA_return := r |} =>
  {| RA_normal := Q; RA_break := b; RA_continue := c; RA_return := r |}
 end.Definition normal_ret_assert (Q: assert) : ret_assert :=
  {| RA_normal := Q; RA_break := seplog.FF; RA_continue := seplog.FF; RA_return := fun _ => seplog.FF |}.Definition frame_ret_assert (R: ret_assert) (F: assert) : ret_assert :=
 match R with 
  {| RA_normal := n; RA_break := b; RA_continue := c; RA_return := r |} =>
  {| RA_normal := fun rho => n rho * F rho; 
     RA_break := fun rho => b rho * F rho; 
     RA_continue := fun rho => c rho * F rho;
     RA_return := fun vl rho => r vl rho * F rho |}
 end.Definition conj_ret_assert (R: ret_assert) (F: assert) : ret_assert :=
 match R with 
  {| RA_normal := n; RA_break := b; RA_continue := c; RA_return := r |} =>
  {| RA_normal := fun rho => n rho && F rho; 
     RA_break := fun rho => b rho && F rho; 
     RA_continue := fun rho => c rho && F rho;
     RA_return := fun vl rho => r vl rho && F rho |}
 end.Definition switch_ret_assert (R: ret_assert) : ret_assert :=
 match R with 
  {| RA_normal := n; RA_break := b; RA_continue := c; RA_return := r |} =>
  {| RA_normal := seplog.FF; 
     RA_break := n; 
     RA_continue := c;
     RA_return := r |}
 end.

Lemma proj_frame: forall P F ek vl, proj_ret_assert (frame_ret_assert P F) ek vl = fun rho => F rho * proj_ret_assert P ek vl rho.