Feline coronaviruses are enveloped, positive sense RNA viruses that can be classified into two biotypes, namely low virulent Feline Enteric Coronavirus (FECV) and highly virulent Feline Infectious Peritonitis Virus (FIPV). FECV is very common in the cat population worldwide, and has been shown to have infected 20-60% pet cats and shed by 75-100% cats in multi-cat environments [1, 2] . Of those shedding the virus, 1-5% will develop Feline Infectious Peritonitis (FIP) disease [3] . Within the biotypes, the viruses are differentiated further into serotype I and serotype II, based on virus neutralizing antibodies. Type I FECV and FIPV strains are more ubiquitous worldwide and are more likely to cause clinical FIP, while type II strains are less common, but more adaptable to cell culture [2] .
It has been suggested that FIPV, the causative agent for FIP, is a mutant form of FECV [4, 5] ; where several possible nature of mutation responsible for the increase in virulence has been characterized. Studies have shown that several mutations throughout the FIPV genome were detected, but mutations at 3c membrane protein and 7b secretory glycoprotein genes were suggested to be responsible for transforming FECV to FIPV [4, 5] . A recent study revealed that mutation of the S1/S2 locus and modulation of a furin recognition site normally present in the S gene of FECVs is a critical contributing factor for development of FIP [6] . Furthermore, it was found that FIPV infection is associated with T cell depletion by apoptosis; although the virus cannot infect CD4+ and CD8+ T cells [7, 8] . Therefore, apoptosis of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells is probably caused by mediators from infected macrophages and/or intestinal epithelial cells [8, 9] . Hence, little is known about the interaction of the virus and host cells; especially the early cellular transcriptional responses towards virus infection, virus mechanism of inducing T cell apoptosis, and the absence of cell-mediated immunity (CMI) response in FIP infected cats.
The use of a next generation sequencing approach in RNA sequencing has facilitated understanding in defining the expression profiles of cellular responses during pathogen infections. This method has been proven to be helpful in explaining the pathogenesis of various viruses [10, 11] , including Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (FIV) infection [12, 13] . Furthermore, the availability of complete 1.9X of cat genome, using the Whole Genome Shotgun (WGS) approach, provides valuable information for the bioinformatic's analysis of feline host responses, following pathogen infection. Moreover, the cat genome contigs were aligned, mapped, and annotated to NCBI annotated genome sequence of six index mammalian genomes (human, chimpanzee, mouse, rat, dog, and cow) using MegaBLAST [14] .
Previous study has shown that more than 70% of FIPV strain 79-1146 were internalized by CRFK cells at 3 hours post infection [15] . Hence, in this study, mRNA from CRFK cells infected with FIPV strain 79-1146 at 3 h.p.i were sequenced using Illumina next generation sequencing technology. The generated data was then analyzed using CLC bio Genomic Workbench, where the genes were compared to Felis catus 1.9X annotated shotgun reference genome. Kal's Z-test on expression proportions [16] was used to determine significantly expressed genes. Genes expressed with a False Discovery Rate (FDR) <0.05 and >1.99 fold change were considered for further analysis.
Overall, the trimmed sequence reads match to 25,689 annotated transcripts; where only 215 (0.8%) were statistically significant (Kal's Z test, p < 0.05), and out of the significant matched, only 96 (44.7%) transcripts were expressed with fold absolute change of 2 or more. Of these 96 transcripts, 76 (79.2%) were up-regulated and the remainder were down-regulated. After BLAST analysis, 76 up-regulated transcripts were matched to 44 genes while 20 down-regulated transcripts were matched to 17 genes. Of the 44 up-regulated genes, there were 2 transcripts per gene for 32 genes, but only one transcript per gene for the remaining 12 genes. Meanwhile, of the 17 down-regulated genes, there was one transcript per gene for 14 genes and 2 transcripts per gene for 3 genes.
As shown in Figure 1 , the RPKM of control samples was plotted against the RPKM of infected samples; and as such, genes with equal expression will line-up on the diagonal identity line while genes with different expression values will either be over or under the diagonal line. The further away the point is from the identity line, the larger is the difference between its expressions in one experiment compared with the other. Except for 4 genes (MX1, RSAD2, PLIN2, and SERPINB1), most genes from both samples were closely clustered together, thus suggesting a homogeneous expression. The plot excluded 3 genes (CCL8, RNF7, and RPL39) that had infinite fold change expressions. Table 1 shows the top 20 up-regulated genes (in decreasing order) and their functions. The majority of the genes were those associated with immune response, while the remainder were associated with apoptosis, cell cycle, cytokine, and ubiquitination activities. Furthermore, there were also 5 Interferon Stimulated Genes (ISGs) coded for 6 proteins (RSAD2, A3C, A3H, MDA5, IFI35, and MX1) that were involved in inhibiting viral entry, replication, and production. Interestingly, one gene (PD-L1), which negatively regulates immune response in viral infection, was also found to be highly up-regulated. Meanwhile, the majority of the down-regulated genes were involved in pro-inflammatory cytokine's activation, CMI, and anti-apoptosis activities ( Table 2) . Two unique downregulated genes (RNF7 and RPL39) were found to be expressed in control uninfected cells only, where the former had anti-apoptotic effect and the latter translated RNA to protein.
Three host genes (A3H, PD-1, and PD-L1) were selected for real-time RT-qPCR analysis, because they were highly up-regulated and may play important roles during FIPV induced disease; judging by their functions. A3H was involved in viral RNA and DNA editing, causing mutation, while PD-1 and its ligand (PD-L1) were involved in programmed cell death that was associated with negative regulation of immune response. Comparisons of fold change results of real-time PCR and transcriptome study for A3H and PD-L1 genes revealed almost similar levels of fold changes. The transcriptome resulted in 4.07 and 5.65 fold change for 2 transcripts of A3H while real-time PCR resulted in 5.23 ± 1.15 fold changes (Tables 1 and 3) . Meanwhile, transcriptome resulted in 3.29 and 4.24 fold changes for 2 transcripts of PD-L1 gene while real-time PCR resulted in 3.97 ± 0.29 fold changes. In the case of the PD-1 gene, RNA sequencing was unable to detect the gene expression, due to low coverage (i.e., data not shown), although real-time PCR was able to detect an up-regulation of the gene at 3 h.p.i.
FIPV induced high and exceptionally high A3H expression at 3 and 48 h.p.i. respectively, but from 6 to 24 h.p.i., the gene was down-regulated. FIPV infected cells also showed high up-regulation of PD-1 expression at 3 h.p.i. and moderately up-regulated at 12 h.p.i but were being down-regulated at 6, 9, 24 and 48 h.p.i. Meanwhile, PD-L1 gene was consistently down-regulated from 3 hours to 48 h.p.i.
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs), obtained from cats with clinical signs associated with FIP (Table 4) , were purified and analysed with real-time PCR. In general, all of the FIP diagnosed cats expressed the PD-1 and PD-L1 genes more than 2 folds, while only 2 cats expressed A3H gene more than 2 folds ( Table 5 ). The highest expression fold for A3H, PD-1 and PD-L1 genes was detected from cat no. 3 at 3.44 ± 0.36, 68.13 ± 19.45, and 96.94 ± 21.54 fold changes, respectively. Meanwhile, cat no. 5 showed less fold changes of the genes compared to the other FIP diagnosed cats.
The pathogenesis of feline coronavirus infection is unclear. The reference feline genome sequence assembly of transcriptome analysis of early infection (3 h.p.i.) of CRFK cells with FIPV 79-1146 showed that the expressions of 215 transcripts (0.8% of the trimmed annotated) were statistically significant, based on Kal's Z test. Only 96 transcripts, which consisted of 44 up-regulated genes and 17 down-regulated genes, were expressed with fold absolute changes of 2 or more. Since only one sample per group was analysed, Kal's Z test was used to determine the significant differences in the expression profiles. Study has shown that this test evaluates single sample against another single sample where each group in an experiment has only one sample [16] . This test is based on an approximation of the binomial distribution by the normal distribution considering proportions Figure 1 Scatter plot of control RNA-seq RPKM versus infected RNA-seq RPKM of significant transcripts (p < 0.05) with absolute fold change value of 2 or more. Most genes from both samples are closely clustered except for 4 genes label 1 to 6. 1 and 2 are MX1 transcripts 1 and 2, respectively, 3 and 4 = RSAD2 transcripts 1 and 2, respectively, 5 = PLIN2 and 6 = SERPINB1. rather than raw counts so that it can be used reliably on libraries of different size. The transcriptional profiles of selected genes in FIPV in vitro infected cells, as well as cats diagnosed with FIP, were explored. The expressions of A3H, which involved in viral RNA and DNA editing causing mutation during RNA virus infection [17] and PD-1 and its ligand (PD-L1), which are involved in programmed cell death and negative regulation of T cells immune response [18] , were characterised. A3H has antiretroviral activity by generating lethal hypermutations in viral genomes and is associated with increased resistance to HIV-1 infection in certain populations [19] . In the case of felines, A3H (but not A3C) has been found to reduce the infectivity of feline leukemia virus [17] . It is interesting to detect that the expression of A3H is readily expressed at higher levels in PBMCs than in FIPV infected cells (Tables 3  and 5 ), indicating the possible involvement of the gene in antiviral activity. Furthermore, the up-regulation of the gene is less, compared to PD-1 and PD-L1 in FIPV diagnosed cats. In addition, the expressions of A3H are significantly up-regulated in FIPV infected CRFK cells at 48 h.p.i. The actual reason for this high expression of A3H is unclear, but suggests that this gene is essential in restricting viral replication or forming part of the type 1 interferon-induced innate response, since recent study has indicated the involvement of A3H in restricting virus replication [17, 20] .
Our results show that up-regulation of PD-1 and PD-L1 gene's expression in PBMCs occurred in cats diagnosed with the FIP disease. In general, their expressions are correlated to each other. Similar patterns were also observed in chronic FIV infection [21] and in HIV infection in humans [22] ; where they were associated with increasing immune dysfunction and T cell depletion. Previous studies have shown that although FIPV cannot infect CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells [8] , cats infected with the virus showed T cell depletion by apoptosis resulting in an acute immunodeficiency [7] . Hence, we hypothesized that PD-L1 could be a mediator that mediates apoptosis of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, since its expression is found in a wide range of nonhematopoietic cells [23] . Furthermore, the blockade of PD-L1 expression was found to enhance T cell immunity and cytokine production [24] . Nevertheless, more studies are required to confirm our hypothesis.
It has been established that cats infected with FIPV undergo extensive tissue destruction due to inflammatory reaction [2] . Even though the study was performed on infected CRFK cells, a kidney epithelial cells, it is interesting to note that transcriptome analysis of cells proposed that the inflammation process was associated with proinflammatory and Th1-like cytokines production, due to the up-regulation of several chemokine genes, such as CCL8, CXCL10, and CCL17; and genes associated with innate immune responses, such as PHF11, ATF3, and IRF1. Further study on infection of FIPV in particularly type I FIPV on macrophage-like cells namely fcwf-4 cells and samples from FIP diagnosed cats will add more value to our findings. Furthermore, the down-regulation of CRIP1 (a T helper regulatory gene) ( Table 2 ) also suggests that FIPV infection is associated with Th1 response, based on a study on CRIP1 gene in mice, transgenic mice, and in murine cell line [25] . In that study, they found that the down-regulation of CRIP was associated with the expression of IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNFα. Previous studies have shown that in vitro and in vivo FIPV infections were associated with TNF-α and IFN-γ expressions [9, 26] .
Based on previous studies on the growth of FIPV 79-1146 in CRFK cells, production of progeny virus start between 3 and 6 hours post inoculation and increased rapidly until 12 hours post inoculation [27] . In our study, we found that at 3 hours, a few complete virus genomes that completely aligned to FIPV 79-1146 reference genome sequence (data not shown) has already been assembled. MX1 expression was up-regulated in FIPV infection (Table 1) , similar to other RNA virus infections, its role in FIP pathogenesis is still unclear and requires further investigation. Previous studies have shown that the expression of MX1 gene inhibits viral replication during various RNA virus infections [28, 29] . Early in vitro FIPV infection is also associated with a marked increase in the expression of RSAD2 (radical Sadenosyl methionine domain-containing protein 2) also known as viperin (Table 1) . Previous studies have shown viperin involvement in inhibiting viral RNA and/or protein synthesis during different virus infections, such as the West Nile virus, Dengue virus, and hepatitis virus [30, 31] . Hence, further study is required to define the role of viperin in FIPV replication and infection. Serine Proteinase Inhibitor clade B member 1 (SERPINB1) is the only gene that was markedly down-regulated (Table 2) . SERPINB1 functions as an inhibitor of the neutrophil serine proteases, found at inflammatory sites where the inhibition of the gene prevents tissue destruction by phagocytic cells during the virus clearance process by infiltrating neutrophils and monocytes [32, 33] . Thus, SERPINB1 down-regulation could possibly be part of innate immune response in recruiting phagocytic cells for the proteolytic destruction of infected cells. Besides genes that modulate T cell functions, several genes with proapoptotic and/or anti-apoptotic are also differentially regulated; thus highlighting their functions in regulating the apoptosis of virus infected cells (Additional file 1: Table S1 and Additional file 1: Table S2 ). However, the pro-apoptotic gene YAP-65 or YAP-1, which was found up-regulated in FIV infection in CRFK cells [34] , was not up-regulated in this study.
In conclusion, this present study has described the transcriptional profiles of cellular genes in vitro system can be applied to an in vivo situation and the possible involvement of A3H, PD-1, and PD-L1 genes during FIPV infection. However, further studies are required to elucidate the roles of these genes, and their interactions with other genes, during FIPV replication and infection especially in in vivo model.
Monolayers of Crandell Rees Feline Kidney (CRFK) cells (ATCC® no. CCL-94™) were grown in a base media consisting of Minimum Essential Medium (MEM), 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), 2% penicillin and streptomycin, 2% amphotericin B, and non-essential amino acids at 37°C and 5% CO2. For transcriptome study, CRFK cells were infected with FIPV 79-1146 (ATCC® no. VR-2126™) at a Multiplicity Of Infection (MOI) of 2. The virus was incubated for one hour for virus attachment. After incubation, 1% FBS MEM was added and the cells were incubated for a further 3 hours. At the end of incubation, the cells were harvested using TrypLE™ and centrifuged twice in a PBS at 4°C for 5 minutes at 1000rpm. Cell pellets were stored at −80°C until RNA extraction. For the control sample, the same process was applied, with the exception that 2 ml of sterile PBS was used to replace the virus.
An RNeasy® Mini Kit (Qiagen®, USA) was used to extract and purify RNA samples as per the methods recommended by the manufacturer. The quality of the extracted RNA was determined by an Ultrospec 3000 Pro UV/Visible spectrophotometer (GE Healthcare, UK), where samples with an absorbance ratio value (A260/ A280) of 1.8 to 2.0 were considered for further analysis with an Agilent® 2100 Bioanalyzer. Samples with RNA Integrity Numbers (RIN) 9 to 10, and concentrations higher than 500 ng/μl per sample, were sent for Illumina GAII sequence analysis.
A total of 17.3 Gb of sequencing data, comprised of both control and infected samples, was imported into the CLC bio Genomic Workbench (GWB). The sequences were trimmed for adapter sequences and low quality base. The trimmed raw sequences were subjected to RNA-sequence analysis, by mapping them to an annotated feline genome reference sequence [35] accounting for a maximum of two gaps or mismatches in each sequence. Unpaired group comparisons, based on Reads Per Kilo base per Million (RPKM) [36] , were chosen as expression values for comparison. Kal's Z test statistical analyses, based on False Discovery Rate (FDR) <0.05 and fold change >1.99 were used to filter the expressed transcripts. The resulting list was then BLAST at NCBI servers (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) using GWB's builtin BLAST (blastn, refseq_rna or nr databases, mammals only). Homologous sequences with the lowest e-value, highest score, and lowest percentage of gaps to the query sequence, was selected as the transcript identity.
In order to validate the transcriptome results, the expression profiles of 3 genes (A3H, PD-1, and PD-L1) were analysed using real-time PCR. Briefly, viral RNA from FIPV strain 79-1146 infected CRFK cells at 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 48 hours post infection (h.p.i.) were collected and processed as described previously. Control cells, inoculated with PBS only, were used as a control. Primers were designed using Primer-BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/) and synthesized by AITbiotech PTE LTD (Singapore) ( Table 6 ).
The reactions were performed using SensiFAST™ SYBR No-ROX One Step kit (Bioline Ltd, UK) on Bio-Rad CFX 96™ Real-Time System, with C1000™ Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). Briefly, the reaction mixture of 20 μl contained 10 μl 2× SensiFAST SYBR No-ROX One-Step mix, 0.5 μl forward & reverse primers (5 nM for GADPH, PD-L1 and A3H, 3 nM for PD-1 and 10 nM for YWHAZ), 0.2 μl RT, 0.4 μl RiboSafe RNase inhibitor, 2.4 μl H 2 O, and 6 μl extracted RNA. The RT-qPCR reaction conditions were as follows; one cycle at 45°C for 10mins, one cycle at 95°C for 2 mins, and 35 cycles at 95°C for 5 secs; then 57°C (YWHAZ), 58°C (PD-L1), 59°C (GAPDH), 64°C (A3H), and 65°C (PD-1) for 20 secs; and finally, at 72°C for 5 secs. One cycle for the dissociation curve for all reactions was added and melting curve analysis was performed. Data generated from the technical triplicate experiment was analysed with 2 -ΔΔCT method [37] using Bio-Rad CFX Manager version 2.0. GAPDH and/or YWHAZ genes were chosen as reference genes, based on previous studies [38, 39] .
Besides FIPV infected cell cultures, Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) were also used to analyse the transcriptome results. Six FIP diagnosed domestic short hair breed cats, with ages ranging from 8 months to adult, that were admitted to University Veterinary Hospital, UPM, were considered for this study ( Table 4 ). The cats tested negative for FeLV and FIV antibodies, but positive for FCoV antibodies, and showed abdominal/pleural effusion. Meanwhile, 5 healthy cats, with negative results for FCoV, FeLV, and FIV antibodies, were selected as controls. The kits for FCoV, FeLV and FIV antibody tests originated from Biogal's feline coronavirus (FCoV) [FIP] ImmunoComb® Antibody test kit (Biogal Galed Laboratories, USA) and IDEXX's SNAP® Combo FeLV Ag/FIV Antibody test kit (IDEXX Laboratories, USA), respectively. The tests were performed as per the methods recommended in their respective manuals. The health assessment and blood collection of the cats were performed by a trained and certified veterinarian (GTS). The sampling were performed according to internationally recognized guidelines and recommended by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia. Two to 5 ml of cat blood was drawn and stored at 4°C in BD Vacutainer® (BD USA) EDTA-K2 tubes. Parts of the blood were used for the test kits, while the rest was processed for PBMCs extraction. PBMCs were isolated using the Ficoll-Paque™ Plus (GE Healthcare, USA) method, according to the manufacturers protocol. Total RNA from PBMCs was isolated using an RNeasy mini plus kit (Qiagen, Germany), as described by the manufacturer. RNA quantity and purity was measured and assessed using a Nanodrop Nanophotometer P-class (Implen GmbH, Germany). The isolated RNA samples were either kept at −80°C for further analysis, or immediately used for real-time RT-qPCR analysis.
Additional file 1: Table S1 . List of 76 transcripts from 44 up regulated genes with proportions fold change of 2 or more (Kal's Z test, FDR < 0.05) with their BLAST results, NCBI accession number and gene product function. Table S2 . List of 20 transcripts from 17 down regulated genes with proportions fold change of −2 or more (Kal's Z test, FDR < 0.05) with their BLAST results, NCBI accession number and gene product function. 