Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused an outbreak in China and is spreading worldwide [1] . As of March 23, 2020, the epidemic has spread exponentially in South Korea, with more than 8,961 patients found positive based on 338,036 tests conducted [2] . In the aftermath of the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) outbreak in 2015, the South Korean Government established a system that enables emergency use authorization (EUA) of in vitro diagnostics (IVDs) for infectious diseases [3] . As a result, South Korea could swiftly approve its first real-time reverse transcription (RT) PCR kit for COVID-19 testing on February 4, 2020 [4] , following the country's first reported case of COVID-19 on January 20, 2020 [5] . Shortly after, four additional kits were approved for testing [6] . Currently, 15,000 to 20,000 tests per day are being carried out by national central labs and 95 non-governmental clinical laboratories. These laboratories have been all certified by Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine (KSLM) and have also completed external quality assessments by the Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service (KEQAS). This issue of Ann Lab Med presents the guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis of CO-VID-19, which is followed in clinical laboratories in South Korea [6] .
As local communities continue to be at risk of the virus spread, on February 23 2020, South Korea raised its national infectious disease alert to the highest level and further mobilized its resources to prevent the spread of COVID-19 [7] . A vast number of real-time RT PCR testing is being carried out thanks to the timely implementation of EUA; however, the country's diagnostic capacity requires further improvement such as addressing the need to shorten the 6-hr turnaround time for testing in situations such as the current COVID-19 crisis. It is also noticeable that a large-scale real-time RT PCR testing is difficult to be implemented in countries with limited resources.
Considering this, what can be done to further improve effectiveness in diagnostic testing? To reduce the spread of CO-VID-19, the World Health Organization (WHO) has opened its Emergency Use Listing procedure for new submissions; as of February 12, 2020, 220 IVDs have been listed that will be evaluated for analytical sensitivity. Additionally, there are six commercialized near point-of-care (POC) nucleic acid tests (NATs) and nine near-POC NATs under development [8] . However, POC-NATs, developed for rapid diagnosis and use under limited resources, are rarely implemented in outbreak situations caused by novel pathogens. South Korea, despite its robust testing capacity, is no exception to this discrepancy. The Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) and BioFire COVID-19 Test (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT), which can be tested within 45 minutes, received EUA from the United States FDA as of March 23, 2020 [9] . It is expected to be useful in these urgent situations. In order to cope with other novel infectious diseases that may occur in the future, a system for developing, accrediting, and distributing rapid diagnostic testing,