COVID-19 has brought misery to many regions in the world, especially in Europe. However, it has just taken off in other parts of the world. The remaining regions, including India hosts huge population approximately more than 50% of the world population. There is an eminent danger and most of these population are under the poverty-line or the countries do not have huge resources for medical interventions for affected patients. The options are limited -either go for herd immunity which can backfire and it is too risky or lockdown and restrict the population from moving around. Thus we try to factor in the percentage of population allowed to move around (some are essential services and some not obeying the orders) and assuming the mobility factors appropriately 1 , we try to predict what can happen during the lockdown. We specifically take Italian case for Karnataka because of the population resemblance.
The dynamics governing the evolution of the COVID-19 infections have been modeled using a stochastic differential equation SIR model [1] . The parameters of this model have been initially optimized for a set of European regions, individually. An aggregate of these parameters have then been used for projecting the future trends for the Indian region, specifically for Karnataka state. Multiple projections have been generated by varying the exposure factor that influences the growth rate of infections. This is done in order to provide insights for selective regional quarantining and lock-downs.
The evolution of COVID-19 infections in each region, has been modeled via the stochastic susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) model [1] which is given as,
Model states 1) t is a daily-time parameter.
2) C(t) denotes the number of active infections at time t.
3) S(t) denotes the total susceptible population at time t. 4) R(t) denotes the total number of recoveries and deaths at time t. 5) dC(t), dS(t), dR(t) denotes the change in the states at time t. 6) dW t is an incremental Weiner process (Brownian motion), which models the randomness in the evolution.
• Growth rate: the constant β denotes the growth rate, which factors the rise in the number of infections, due to interactions between susceptible and infected population. This parameter is a lumped constants which is meant to account for: (a) the population size, (b) reproduction number R 0 of COVID-19, and (c) exposure-factor (which depends on mobility, precautionary measures, etc.). • γ is the rate of outcomes, i.e., the rate at which the infections are neutralized, which may be due to recovery or death. It is assumed that recovered persons would not spread the infections again (at least for a window of a month). • σ is a parameter used to model the stochasticity or randomness in the evolution, which may cause local deviations from the typical (exponential) trends. • P total is the population of the region, C 0 and S 0 are initial number of infections and susceptible individuals.
The parameters of the SIR model were optimized based on the data obtained for different European regions and India. The criterion for optimization was to simultaneously minimize the square integral error, terminal error and terminal rate error, between the actual data and daily samples of the simulated data. Further, because we have data for more number of days for European countries, we try to use the parameters from those countries and appropriate it on the Indian data which is for lesser number of days. The assumption is that India may be in the catch game (which, of course, we do not want) if the behaviour of people is taken to be similar. We have to base our predictions based on some gross assumptions under the given circumstances.
Note: We have taken the Italian and German data 4 days earlier than France and Spain in order to reflect the earlier trend before their respective lockdown conditions. This will enable us to simulate for various levels of lockdown percentages (exposure factor).
The SIR model has been simulated and the parameters have been optimized based on the infection trends obtained for European countries for 24 days, and India for 8 days (after 15 th March, when the infections started to show an exponential trend). The stochastic differential equations have been simulated using the Euler-Maruyama numerical integration method [2] . We present below how our model is with respect to various European countries.
The SIR model has been simulated beyond the 8 days of considered data for India, with parameters averaged over the European regions considered above, as well as with the parameters obtained for the Indian region. This is done in order to demonstrate the possible growth of infections in India, based on the current trend so far (which is an optimistic case), or based on the European trend (which is the case to be prepared for). An exposure factor has been introduced to scale down the rate of infections β. This factor illustrates the additional reduction in mobility due to state-wide lock-down and quarantining measures, which are essential for maintaining the infections within reasonable limits. For India we have two sets, (i) using the available data only from India and (ii) taking the model parameters from considered European countries and projecting on Indian case.
Note: We have four graphs in each set. For example, when we use 100% exposure, that means there is no lockdown. When we use 50% exposure half of the country is lockdown. This is to show the gravity of the situation.
The Italy and average European parameters have been used to project the future trends for the state of Karnataka. The Italy parameters have been chosen to predict the worst-case scenario, and the European average parameters. The initial number of infections is assumed to be 100 (as of today) to accounted for additional unreported or undetected infections, over reported ones. We have made the assumption here that lockdown is in place and we have taken varied percentage of people obeying the rules. We only consider 20%-5% of the population mobile. Let us summerize very briefly what we observe.
• Below 10% exposure required for avoiding exponential growth, with European average trend. • Below 5% exposure required for avoiding exponential growth, with Italian trend. This is a very significant aspect in the whole of this work because, Karnataka has less infrastructure and similar population. Only advantage is that the mobility is impeded by lack of high speed transportation, which is a blessing in disguise compared to Italy. • Below 6% exposure required for decline in infections, with European average trend. • Below 3% exposure required for decline in infections, with Italian trend. That means we need to have less than 10 lakh people to be on the street to be well within the limit because of heavy assumptions. • Fig.10 suggests the inevitable need for an Extended lockdow period for several months for Karnataka, or until a vaccine is available. • By 'lockdown' we mean restricted mixing i.e. fewer susceptible individuals s(t) interact with fewer infected individuals c(t), thereby introducing a factor in the prod- 
This is a continuous work in which we are trying to find the model parameters everyday and project the possible scenarios, by varying the exposure factor for the rate of infection, as a result of evolving levels of quarantining. While this is not a completely verifiable projection, the model parameters look quite consistent, however they may reflect an over estimation of the projected number of infections in order to compensate for the unreported or undetected infections. Thus, we may take the numbers in this note to be a guide for further action by the law enforcing authorities. 