The post-COVID19 built environment must avoid a long-term legacy where people fear public places, 63 considered threatened, with habitat loss considered a significant threat (Houlahan et al. 2000; Stuart 98 et al. 2004 ). However, we are only scratching at the surface assessing overall biodiversity loss because 99 of reductions in wetland quantity and quality as a result of urbanisation (Hull 2016) . Wetland loss is 100 occurring at a faster rate than wetland reserves are created (McCauley, Jenkins & Quintana-Ascencio 101 2013) and urban wetlands provide critical habitat for some of the worlds most endangered species. 102
However, constructed urban wetland reserves are often in areas where wetland connectivity is 103 limited, and they are designed solely for recreational uses or to alleviate risks of flooding (Hull 2016) . 104
The true extent of wetland loss is unknown in most countries because comprehensive national 105 inventories rarely exist. Globally, intermittent estimates of wetland loss exist but due to lack of 106 standardisation and consistent definition of the term wetland, the estimates cannot be directly 107 compared. South America, Russia and Africa record no wetland data (Hu et al. 2017 ). Some European 108 countries have produced sporadic inventories but estimates would not be comparable to USA 109 estimates which have been steadily logged since 1979 through a National Wetland Inventory (NWI) 110 (Ling et al. 2018; Hull 2016) . Wetland loss in Australia is unknown because a comprehensive national 111 inventory does not exist, however a NSW state-wide inventory was in produced in 2004, but its focus 112 was on the larger inland wetlands (Ling et al. 2018) . 113
Urban wildlife has positive impacts on cities and urban residents by providing ecosystem services and 114 inspire a feeling of connection with nature. Freshwater turtles, such as the eastern long-necked turtle 115 (Chelodina longicollis), are common in urban wetlands and are regarded as indicators of water and 116 ecosystem quality (Blamires & Spencer 2013) . They play a critical role in ecosystem function through 117 energy flow and nutrient cycling by consuming vast quantities of carrion. Historically, they were 118 widespread throughout eastern Australia in large biomasses (Thompson 1993) . They inhabit almost 119 all types of urban wetlands (DPIE 2018), but populations are declining due to predation from invasive 120 species and threats from urbanisation, such as road mortality from vehicle impacts (Santori et al. 121 2018). Long-necked turtles regularly move large distances over land to new wetlands for nesting and 122
foraging (Thompson 1993) , hence removal of wetlands increases the distances that turtles are 123 required to move between wetlands. This nomadic behaviour makes the species vulnerable due to an 124 increased exposure to predators and interaction with vehicles. This behaviour also brings humans and 125 wildlife together and turtles are widely regarded as a positive connection with nature and eastern 126 long-necked turtles are common pets throughout Australia. Hence, we used the eastern long-necked 127 turtle as a model species in this study to assess the impacts of wetland loss in urban areas. 128
The aim of this study was to create a wetland inventory for Western Sydney, Australia and quantify 129 changes in wetland abundance and surface area from 2010 -2017. We quantified changes in primary 130 land use (natural, urban or agricultural) over the same time period to determine if wetland loss is 131 associated with increased urbanisation. Lastly, we then created species distribution models for the 132 Page 5 of 18 eastern long-necked turtle to determine changes in distribution throughout western Sydney over the 133 last 20 years. 134
This study focused on 10 Local Government Areas (LGAs) to produce a wetland inventory for western 137 Sydney (NSW, Australia) (Figure 1) 
We used the online aerial imagery service NearMap (NearMap 2017) to record the number and size 146 of every wetland in the above mentioned LGAs. A wetland was any form of water body visible such as 147 a dam, pond and lake. Urban drains and rivers were not included, instead been noted as present. Each 148
LGA was split up into suburbs, and grids with 50m zoom were established to methodically measure There is a significant overlap between the location of wetland loss and increased urbanisation 218 ( Figure 5) . Blacktown, Penrith, The Hills and Liverpool are LGA's that have suburbs with high rates of 219 urbanisation and wetland loss. Fairfield has lost wetland surface area, but this was not associated 220 with urbanisation. Camden shows a hotspot for urbanisation but not major reduction in increased wetland surface area, and while this may provide habitat for turtles, these areas were also 243 associated with a reduction in distribution (Figure 6) , thus the quality of these constructed wetlands 244 in these areas may not support long-term turtle populations. 245
Broad changes in both the number of wetlands and wetland surface area are a significant lost 247 opportunity to integrate green infrastructure, green space and planned biodiversity conservation into 248 the urban environment. In some areas of western Sydney, wetland loss has occurred rapidly with up 249 to 21% of wetland surface area and 25% of wetland density decreasing over the eight-year period 250 ( Figure 2; Figure 3 ). Urban land use type increased on average, by 4.8% per LGA (Figure 4) , and the 251 hotspots for increased urbanisation almost directly matched the critical hotspots for wetland loss 252 ( Figure 5) . Thus, development due to urban sprawl is the cause of wetland loss in western Sydney 253 areas serve as functional wetlands with complex ecosystems. We see some reduction in the 259 distribution of turtles through that area ( Figure 6 ) despite increases in water surface area (Figure 6) . The legislative requirements for developers removing wetlands varies throughout the world. Albert, 328
Canada for example, implement a strategy where landowners must apply for a permit before 329 undertaking any task that may negatively impact a wetland. However, as no wetland inventory exists, 330 any illegal draining of wetlands cannot be monitored and mitigated, and between 1999-2009 80% of 331 wetland loss was due to illegal draining (Clare & Creed 2014) . Wetland inventory is crucial as a 332 resource of accountability to enforce degradation and removal legislation, but also as a tool to assess 333 the effectiveness of wetland policies. Western Sydney development is governed by the Biodiversity 334 and wetland inventory into effective government policy, which promotes responsibility and ownership 353 of wetland nutrients, will support a balance between economic and biodiversity growth in an 354 urbanising environment. Combined with "net biodiversity positive" land management, it places an 355 economic value on green infrastructure like wetlands and the biodiversity associated with it. Wetlands 356 also contribute to the well-being of the community by acting as urban green spaces, providing 357 aesthetic appeal, landscape diversity and recreational opportunities. They can also contribute to 358 cultural heritage, spiritual values and day-to-day living of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples 359 in Australia. Additionally, wetlands are accessible educational opportunities to learn about the 360 environment, which promotes community engagement in conservation and supporting native 361 biodiversity and sustainability. 362