praj-17/QA-MCQ-Open-ended huggingface dataset:
Title: Frédéric_Chopin
Context: Polish composers of the following generation included virtuosi such as Moritz Moszkowski, but, in the opinion of J. Barrie Jones, his "one worthy successor" among his compatriots was Karol Szymanowski (1882–1937). Edvard Grieg, Antonín Dvořák, Isaac Albéniz, Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky and Sergei Rachmaninoff, among others, are regarded by critics as having been influenced by Chopin's use of national modes and idioms. Alexander Scriabin was devoted to the music of Chopin, and his early published works include nineteen mazurkas, as well as numerous études and preludes; his teacher Nikolai Zverev drilled him in Chopin's works to improve his virtuosity as a performer. In the 20th century, composers who paid homage to (or in some cases parodied) the music of Chopin included George Crumb, Bohuslav Martinů, Darius Milhaud, Igor Stravinsky and Heitor Villa-Lobos.

question: According to J. Barrie Jones who was the only true successor to Chopin? 

answer: Karol Szymanowski

question: Many people were considered influenced by Chopin's what? 

answer: national modes and idioms

question: Who was Alexander Scriabin's teacher? 

answer: Nikolai Zverev

question: Who was Chopin's worthy successor according to Jones? 

answer: Karol Szymanowski

question: Who was devoted to the music of Chopin? 

answer: Alexander Scriabin

question: Who was Alexander Scriabin's teacher? 

answer: Nikolai Zverev
Title: Frédéric_Chopin
Context: Jonathan Bellman writes that modern concert performance style—set in the "conservatory" tradition of late 19th- and 20th-century music schools, and suitable for large auditoria or recordings—militates against what is known of Chopin's more intimate performance technique. The composer himself said to a pupil that "concerts are never real music, you have to give up the idea of hearing in them all the most beautiful things of art." Contemporary accounts indicate that in performance, Chopin avoided rigid procedures sometimes incorrectly attributed to him, such as "always crescendo to a high note", but that he was concerned with expressive phrasing, rhythmic consistency and sensitive colouring. Berlioz wrote in 1853 that Chopin "has created a kind of chromatic embroidery ... whose effect is so strange and piquant as to be impossible to describe ... virtually nobody but Chopin himself can play this music and give it this unusual turn". Hiller wrote that "What in the hands of others was elegant embellishment, in his hands became a colourful wreath of flowers."

question: Who wrote that the current large concert style conflicts with Chopin's preference of intimate performances? 

answer: Jonathan Bellman

question: What did Chopin tend to avoid? 

answer: rigid procedures

question: What has been falsely credited to Chopin? 

answer: "always crescendo to a high note"

question: What did Chopin tell a student is given up in concerts? 

answer: hearing in them all the most beautiful things of art

question: Who wrote about Chopin's "chromatic embroidery"? 

answer: Berlioz

question: Who wrote that Chopin's music, when played by him, became a "colorful wreath of flowers"? 

answer: Hiller
Title: Frédéric_Chopin
Context: Chopin's music is frequently played with rubato, "the practice in performance of disregarding strict time, 'robbing' some note-values for expressive effect". There are differing opinions as to how much, and what type, of rubato is appropriate for his works. Charles Rosen comments that "most of the written-out indications of rubato in Chopin are to be found in his mazurkas ... It is probable that Chopin used the older form of rubato so important to Mozart ... [where] the melody note in the right hand is delayed until after the note in the bass ... An allied form of this rubato is the arpeggiation of the chords thereby delaying the melody note; according to Chopin's pupil, Karol Mikuli, Chopin was firmly opposed to this practice."

question: Chopin's compositions are often played with what? 

answer: rubato

question: What does rubato mean? 

answer: the practice in performance of disregarding strict time

question: In Chopin's music where strict timing is disregarded, what is it called? 

answer: rubato

question: What type of Chopin's music had the most disregard for strict timing according to Charles Rosen? 

answer: mazurkas
Title: Frédéric_Chopin
Context: Friederike Müller, a pupil of Chopin, wrote: "[His] playing was always noble and beautiful; his tones sang, whether in full forte or softest piano. He took infinite pains to teach his pupils this legato, cantabile style of playing. His most severe criticism was 'He—or she—does not know how to join two notes together.' He also demanded the strictest adherence to rhythm. He hated all lingering and dragging, misplaced rubatos, as well as exaggerated ritardandos ... and it is precisely in this respect that people make such terrible errors in playing his works."

question: According to who did Chopin demand strictly sticking with rhythm? 

answer: Friederike Müller

question: Which student said Chopin made sure his students knew his legato, cantabile style of playing? 

answer: Friederike Müller

question: According to Friederike Müller, Chopin insisted his students have the strictest adherence to what? 

answer: rhythm.
Title: Frédéric_Chopin
Context: With his mazurkas and polonaises, Chopin has been credited with introducing to music a new sense of nationalism. Schumann, in his 1836 review of the piano concertos, highlighted the composer's strong feelings for his native Poland, writing that "Now that the Poles are in deep mourning [after the failure of the November 1830 rising], their appeal to us artists is even stronger ... If the mighty autocrat in the north [i.e. Nicholas I of Russia] could know that in Chopin's works, in the simple strains of his mazurkas, there lurks a dangerous enemy, he would place a ban on his music. Chopin's works are cannon buried in flowers!" The biography of Chopin published in 1863 under the name of Franz Liszt (but probably written by Carolyne zu Sayn-Wittgenstein) claims that Chopin "must be ranked first among the first musicians ... individualizing in themselves the poetic sense of an entire nation."

question: Chopin was noted as introducing music to what? 

answer: sense of nationalism

question: What year did Schumann review Chopin's piano concertos? 

answer: 1836

question: In his review Schumann made note of Chopin's emotions for what? 

answer: Poland

question: Why did Schumann say the Poles were in mourning? 

answer: the failure of the November 1830

question: A biography on Chopin released under Franz Liszt's name was likely written by who? 

answer: Carolyne zu Sayn-Wittgenstein

question: Chopin was able to bring about a new sense of nationalism with his music because of his mazurkas and what? 

answer: polonaises

question: Who wrote a glowing review of Chopin's love for his country through his music in 1836? 

answer: Schumann

question: Schumann described Chopin's music as cannons buried in what? 

answer: flowers

question: Though Franz Liszt is credited with Chopin's 1863 biography, who probably actually wrote it? 

answer: Carolyne zu Sayn-Wittgenstein
Title: Frédéric_Chopin
Context: Some modern commentators have argued against exaggerating Chopin's primacy as a "nationalist" or "patriotic" composer. George Golos refers to earlier "nationalist" composers in Central Europe, including Poland's Michał Kleofas Ogiński and Franciszek Lessel, who utilised polonaise and mazurka forms. Barbara Milewski suggests that Chopin's experience of Polish music came more from "urbanised" Warsaw versions than from folk music, and that attempts (by Jachimecki and others) to demonstrate genuine folk music in his works are without basis. Richard Taruskin impugns Schumann's attitude toward Chopin's works as patronizing and comments that Chopin "felt his Polish patriotism deeply and sincerely" but consciously modelled his works on the tradition of Bach, Beethoven, Schubert and Field.

question: Who said that Chopin's familiarity with Polish music was more "urbanised"  than true folk music? 

answer: Barbara Milewski

question: George Golos references what two musicians when claiming Chopin's nationalism was overrated?  

answer: Michał Kleofas Ogiński and Franciszek Lessel

question: Who said Chopin's works were modeled after Bach, Beethoven, Schubert and Field? 

answer: Richard Taruskin
Title: Frédéric_Chopin
Context: A reconciliation of these views is suggested by William Atwood: "Undoubtedly [Chopin's] use of traditional musical forms like the polonaise and mazurka roused nationalistic sentiments and a sense of cohesiveness amongst those Poles scattered across Europe and the New World ... While some sought solace in [them], others found them a source of strength in their continuing struggle for freedom. Although Chopin's music undoubtedly came to him intuitively rather than through any conscious patriotic design, it served all the same to symbolize the will of the Polish people ..."

question: William Atwood suggested that Chopin's music wasn't purposely patriotic but what? 

answer: intuitive

question: A modern commentator, William Atwood, feels Poles not only sought solace in Chopin's music but also found them a source of strength as they continued to fight for what? 

answer: freedom

question: Where were Poles scattered to? 

answer: Europe and the New World
Title: Frédéric_Chopin
Context: Jones comments that "Chopin's unique position as a composer, despite the fact that virtually everything he wrote was for the piano, has rarely been questioned." He also notes that Chopin was fortunate to arrive in Paris in 1831—"the artistic environment, the publishers who were willing to print his music, the wealthy and aristocratic who paid what Chopin asked for their lessons"—and these factors, as well as his musical genius, also fuelled his contemporary and later reputation. While his illness and his love-affairs conform to some of the stereotypes of romanticism, the rarity of his public recitals (as opposed to performances at fashionable Paris soirées) led Arthur Hutchings to suggest that "his lack of Byronic flamboyance [and] his aristocratic reclusiveness make him exceptional" among his romantic contemporaries, such as Liszt and Henri Herz.

question: Arthur Hutchings stated that Chopin's lack of what made him special? 

answer: Byronic flamboyance

question: Who were two of Chopin's contemporaries? 

answer: Liszt and Henri Herz

question: What place was considered lucky for Chopin to have arrived at considering how much he charged for piano lessons? 

answer: Paris

question: Who said Chopin was unlike his romantic contemporaries Liszt and Henri Herz? 

answer: Arthur Hutchings
Title: Frédéric_Chopin
Context: Chopin's qualities as a pianist and composer were recognized by many of his fellow musicians. Schumann named a piece for him in his suite Carnaval, and Chopin later dedicated his Ballade No. 2 in F major to Schumann. Elements of Chopin's music can be traced in many of Liszt's later works. Liszt later transcribed for piano six of Chopin's Polish songs. A less fraught friendship was with Alkan, with whom he discussed elements of folk music, and who was deeply affected by Chopin's death.

question: In what suite did Schumann name a work for Chopin? 

answer: Carnaval

question: What piece of Chopin's work was dedicated to Schumann?  

answer: Ballade No. 2 in F major

question: How many of Chopin's Polish songs did Liszt transliterate for piano? 

answer: six

question: With who did Chopin feel comfortable speaking of folk music with? 

answer: Alkan

question: What was recognized about Chopin from his musical peers? 

answer: qualities as a pianist and composer

question: What Schumann suite contained the name of a piece Schumann named for Chopin? 

answer: Carnaval

question: What piece did Chopin dedicate to Schumann? 

answer: Ballade No. 2 in F major

question: What other musician shows to have elements of Chopin in his work? 

answer: Liszt
Title: Frédéric_Chopin
Context: Two of Chopin's long-standing pupils, Karol Mikuli (1821–1897) and Georges Mathias, were themselves piano teachers and passed on details of his playing to their own students, some of whom (such as Raoul Koczalski) were to make recordings of his music. Other pianists and composers influenced by Chopin's style include Louis Moreau Gottschalk, Édouard Wolff (1816–1880) and Pierre Zimmermann. Debussy dedicated his own 1915 piano Études to the memory of Chopin; he frequently played Chopin's music during his studies at the Paris Conservatoire, and undertook the editing of Chopin's piano music for the publisher Jacques Durand.

question: Who dedicated his 1915 piano Études to Chopin? 

answer: Debussy

question: For what publisher to Debussy edit Chopin's music for? 

answer: Jacques Durand

question: Who was a student of Chopin's former students and actually recorded some Chopin music? 

answer: Raoul Koczalski

question: What music did Debussy play a lot at the Paris Conservatoire? 

answer: Chopin's
Title: Sino-Tibetan_relations_during_the_Ming_dynasty
Context: The exact nature of relations between Tibet and the Ming dynasty of China (1368–1644) is unclear. Analysis of the relationship is further complicated by modern political conflicts and the application of Westphalian sovereignty to a time when the concept did not exist. Some Mainland Chinese scholars, such as Wang Jiawei and Nyima Gyaincain, assert that the Ming dynasty had unquestioned sovereignty over Tibet, pointing to the Ming court's issuing of various titles to Tibetan leaders, Tibetans' full acceptance of these titles, and a renewal process for successors of these titles that involved traveling to the Ming capital. Scholars within China also argue that Tibet has been an integral part of China since the 13th century and that it was thus a part of the Ming Empire. But most scholars outside China, such as Turrell V. Wylie, Melvin C. Goldstein, and Helmut Hoffman, say that the relationship was one of suzerainty, that Ming titles were only nominal, that Tibet remained an independent region outside Ming control, and that it simply paid tribute until the Jiajing Emperor (1521–1566), who ceased relations with Tibet.

question: Who were Wang Jiawei and Nyima Gyaincain? 

answer: Mainland Chinese scholars
Title: Sino-Tibetan_relations_during_the_Ming_dynasty
Context: Some scholars note that Tibetan leaders during the Ming frequently engaged in civil war and conducted their own foreign diplomacy with neighboring states such as Nepal. Some scholars underscore the commercial aspect of the Ming-Tibetan relationship, noting the Ming dynasty's shortage of horses for warfare and thus the importance of the horse trade with Tibet. Others argue that the significant religious nature of the relationship of the Ming court with Tibetan lamas is underrepresented in modern scholarship. In hopes of reviving the unique relationship of the earlier Mongol leader Kublai Khan (r. 1260–1294) and his spiritual superior Drogön Chögyal Phagpa (1235–1280) of the Sakya school of Tibetan Buddhism, the Yongle Emperor (r. 1402–1424) made a concerted effort to build a secular and religious alliance with Deshin Shekpa (1384–1415), the Karmapa of the Karma Kagyu school. However, the Yongle Emperor's attempts were unsuccessful.

question: What important trade did the Ming Dynasty have with Tibet? 

answer: horse trade

question: During what years did the Mongol leader Kublai Khan rule? 

answer: 1402–1424

question: Who did the Yongle Emperor try to build a religious alliance with? 

answer: Deshin Shekpa

question: Deshin Shekpa was the head of what school? 

answer: the Karma Kagyu school

question: The Tibetan leaders had a diplomacy with what neighboring state? 

answer: Nepal
Title: Sino-Tibetan_relations_during_the_Ming_dynasty
Context: The Ming initiated sporadic armed intervention in Tibet during the 14th century, but did not garrison permanent troops there. At times the Tibetans also used armed resistance against Ming forays. The Wanli Emperor (r. 1572–1620) made attempts to reestablish Sino-Tibetan relations after the Mongol-Tibetan alliance initiated in 1578, which affected the foreign policy of the subsequent Qing dynasty (1644–1912) of China in their support for the Dalai Lama of the Gelug school. By the late 16th century, the Mongols were successful armed protectors of the Gelug Dalai Lama, after increasing their presence in the Amdo region. This culminated in Güshi Khan's (1582–1655) conquest of Tibet from 1637–1642 and the establishment of the Ganden Phodrang regime by the 5th Dalai Lama with his help.

question: What did the Tibetans use against Ming forays? 

answer: armed resistance

question: Who were the armed protectors for the Gelug Dalai Lama? 

answer: the Mongols

question: Which regime did Güshi Khan help establish?  

answer: the Ganden Phodrang

question: When was the Mongol-Tibetan alliance started? 

answer: 1578
Title: Sino-Tibetan_relations_during_the_Ming_dynasty
Context: Tibet was once a strong power contemporaneous with Tang China (618–907). Until the Tibetan Empire's collapse in the 9th century, it was the Tang's major rival in dominating Inner Asia. The Yarlung rulers of Tibet also signed various peace treaties with the Tang, culminating in a treaty in 821 that fixed the borders between Tibet and China.

question: In what century did the Tibetan Empire fall? 

answer: the 9th century

question: Who signed multiple peace treaties with the Tang?  

answer: The Yarlung rulers of Tibet

question: What did one of the treaties between the Tang and Tibet help fix? 

answer: the borders between Tibet and China

question: Who was the Tangs biggest rival? 

answer: Tibet

question: What year did Tang and Tibet sign a treaty to fix the borders? 

answer: 821
Title: Sino-Tibetan_relations_during_the_Ming_dynasty
Context: During the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period of China (907–960), while the fractured political realm of China saw no threat in a Tibet which was in just as much political disarray, there was little in the way of Sino-Tibetan relations. Few documents involving Sino-Tibetan contacts survive from the Song dynasty (960–1279). The Song were far more concerned with countering northern enemy states of the Khitan-ruled Liao dynasty (907–1125) and Jurchen-ruled Jin dynasty (1115–1234).

question: When did the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period of China take place? 

answer: 907–960

question: When did the Song dynasty take place? 

answer: 960–1279

question: What dynasty was concerned with countering northern enemy states? 

answer: Song dynasty

question: Who ruled the Liao dynasty? 

answer: the Khitan

question: Who ruled the  Jin dynasty? 

answer: Jurchen
Title: Sino-Tibetan_relations_during_the_Ming_dynasty
Context: In 1207, the Mongol ruler Genghis Khan (r. 1206–1227) conquered and subjugated the ethnic Tangut state of the Western Xia (1038–1227). In the same year, he established diplomatic relations with Tibet by sending envoys there. The conquest of the Western Xia alarmed Tibetan rulers, who decided to pay tribute to the Mongols. However, when they ceased to pay tribute after Genghis Khan's death, his successor Ögedei Khan (r. 1229–1241) launched an invasion into Tibet.

question: Which ruler took Western Xia under their control? 

answer: Genghis Khan

question: Who was Genghis Khan's successor?  

answer: Ögedei Khan

question: What years did Ögedei Khan rule? 

answer: 1229–1241

question: Who invaded Tibet?  

answer: Ögedei Khan
Title: Sino-Tibetan_relations_during_the_Ming_dynasty
Context: The Mongol prince Godan, a grandson of Genghis Khan, raided as far as Lhasa. During his attack in 1240, Prince Godan summoned Sakya Pandita (1182–1251), leader of the Sakya school of Tibetan Buddhism, to his court in what is now Gansu in Western China. With Sakya Pandita's submission to Godan in 1247, Tibet was officially incorporated into the Mongol Empire during the regency of Töregene Khatun (1241–1246). Michael C. van Walt van Praag writes that Godan granted Sakya Pandita temporal authority over a still politically fragmented Tibet, stating that "this investiture had little real impact" but it was significant in that it established the unique "Priest-Patron" relationship between the Mongols and the Sakya lamas.

question: Who was the Mongol prince? 

answer: Godan

question: Who was the leader of the Sakya school of Tibetan Buddhism? 

answer: Sakya Pandita

question: Who was the regent of the Mongol Empire? 

answer: Töregene Khatun

question: In what years was Töregene Khatun the regent of the Mongol Empire? 

answer: 1241–1246
Title: Sino-Tibetan_relations_during_the_Ming_dynasty
Context: Starting in 1236, the Mongol prince Kublai, who later ruled as Khagan from 1260–1294, was granted a large appanage in North China by his superior, Ögedei Khan. Karma Pakshi, 2nd Karmapa Lama (1203–1283)—the head lama of the Karma Kagyu lineage of Tibetan Buddhism—rejected Kublai's invitation, so instead Kublai invited Drogön Chögyal Phagpa (1235–1280), successor and nephew of Sakya Pandita, who came to his court in 1253. Kublai instituted a unique relationship with the Phagpa lama, which recognized Kublai as a superior sovereign in political affairs and the Phagpa lama as the senior instructor to Kublai in religious affairs. Kublai also made Drogön Chögyal Phagpa the director of the government agency known as the Bureau of Buddhist and Tibetan Affairs and the ruling priest-king of Tibet, which comprised thirteen different states ruled by myriarchies.

question: How many states were ruled by myriarchies? 

answer: thirteen

question: What title did prince Kublai rule as from 1260 to 1294? 

answer: Khagan

question: Who was the superior of prince Kublai? 

answer: Ögedei Khan

question: Who became the second Karmapa Lama? 

answer: Karma Pakshi

question: With whom did Kublai Khan have a unique relationship with?  

answer: the Phagpa lama
Title: Sino-Tibetan_relations_during_the_Ming_dynasty
Context: Kublai Khan did not conquer the Song dynasty in South China until 1279, so Tibet was a component of the early Mongol Empire before it was combined into one of its descendant empires with the whole of China under the Yuan dynasty (1271–1368). Van Praag writes that this conquest "marked the end of independent China," which was then incorporated into the Yuan dynasty that ruled China, Tibet, Mongolia, Korea, parts of Siberia and Upper Burma. Morris Rossabi, a professor of Asian history at Queens College, City University of New York, writes that "Khubilai wished to be perceived both as the legitimate Khan of Khans of the Mongols and as the Emperor of China. Though he had, by the early 1260s, become closely identified with China, he still, for a time, claimed universal rule", and yet "despite his successes in China and Korea, Khubilai was unable to have himself accepted as the Great Khan". Thus, with such limited acceptance of his position as Great Khan, Kublai Khan increasingly became identified with China and sought support as Emperor of China.

question: When did Kublai Khan conquer the song dynasty?   

answer: 1279

question: When did the Yuan dynasty rule? 

answer: 1271–1368

question: Which dynasty ruled all of china?  

answer: the Yuan dynasty

question: What did Khubilai claim for a while? 

answer: universal rule

question: Where did Khubilai seek support as Emperor? 

answer: China
Title: Sino-Tibetan_relations_during_the_Ming_dynasty
Context: In 1358, the Sakya viceregal regime installed by the Mongols in Tibet was overthrown in a rebellion by the Phagmodru myriarch Tai Situ Changchub Gyaltsen (1302–1364). The Mongol Yuan court was forced to accept him as the new viceroy, and Changchub Gyaltsen and his successors, the Phagmodrupa Dynasty, gained de facto rule over Tibet.

question: What year was the Sakya viceregal regime eradicated?  

answer: 1358

question: Who placed the Sakya viceregal regime position of authority? 

answer: the Mongols in Tibet

question: Who eradicated the Sakya viceregal regime?  

answer: the Phagmodru myriarch Tai Situ Changchub Gyaltsen

question: Which dynasty became ruler of Tibet?   

answer: the Phagmodrupa Dynasty