		I
		112th CONGRESS
		1st Session
		H. R. 3054
		IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

			September 23, 2011
			Mr. Lewis of Georgia
			 (for himself, Ms. Jackson Lee of
			 Texas, Mr. Rangel,
			 Mr. Grijalva,
			 Ms. Norton,
			 Mr. Meeks,
			 Mr. Filner,
			 Mr. Davis of Illinois,
			 Mr. Jackson of Illinois,
			 Mr. McDermott,
			 Mr. Stark,
			 Ms. Lee of California,
			 Ms. Moore,
			 Mr. McGovern,
			 Mr. Gutierrez,
			 Mr. Payne,
			 Mr. Blumenauer,
			 Mrs. Christensen,
			 Mr. Rush, Mr. Cummings, Mr.
			 Conyers, Mr. Honda, and
			 Mr. Cohen) introduced the following
			 bill; which was referred to the Committee
			 on Education and the Workforce

		A BILL
		To authorize the Attorney General to award grants to
		  eligible entities to prevent or alleviate community violence by providing
		  education, mentoring, and counseling services to children, adolescents,
		  teachers, families, and community leaders on the principles and practice of
		  nonviolence.

		1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the
			 Securing American Families by
			 Educating and Training Youth (SAFETY) Through Nonviolence Act of
			 2011.
		2.Grants to educate
			 Americans about the principles of nonviolence
			(a)GrantsThe
			 Attorney General may make grants to eligible entities to prevent or alleviate
			 the effects of community violence by providing education, mentoring, and
			 counseling to youth regarding the principles and application of nonviolence in
			 conflict resolution.
			(b)PriorityIn
			 awarding grants under this section, the Attorney General shall give priority to
			 applicants that agree to use the grant in 1 or more eligible urban, rural,
			 Tribal, and suburban communities that can certify—
				(1)an increase in
			 community, especially youth violence; and
				(2)lack the monetary
			 or other resources to address violence prevention.
				(c)LimitationThe
			 Attorney General may not make a grant to an eligible entity under this section
			 unless the entity agrees to use not more than 40 percent of such grant for
			 nonviolence-prevention education and program development.
			(d)DefinitionsIn this section, the term eligible
			 entity means a State or local government entity, educational
			 institution, nonprofit, or faith-based organization.
			(e)Authorization of
			 AppropriationsTo carry out this section, there is authorized to
			 be appropriated $5,000,000 for each of the fiscal years from 2012 through
			 2017.


115 HR 432 IH: Small Business Tax Credit Accessibility Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2017-01-11
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

I115th CONGRESS1st SessionH. R. 432IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESJanuary 11, 2017Ms. DelBene (for herself, Mr. Kind, Mr. Ruppersberger, and Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and MeansA BILLTo amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand and modify the credit for employee health
			 insurance expenses of small employers.

 1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Small Business Tax Credit Accessibility Act. 2.Expansion and modification of credit for employee health insurance expenses of small employers (a)Expansion of definition of eligible small employerSubparagraph (A) of section 45R(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 25 and inserting 50.
 (b)Amendment To phaseout determinationSubsection (c) of section 45R of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:  (c)Phaseout of credit amount based on number of employees and average wagesThe amount of the credit determined under subsection (b) (without regard to this subsection) shall be adjusted (but not below zero) by multiplying such amount by the product of—
 (1)the lesser of— (A)a fraction the numerator of which is the excess (if any) of 50 over the total number of full-time equivalent employees of the employer and the denominator of which is 30, and
 (B)1, and (2)the lesser of—
 (A)a fraction— (i)the numerator of which is the excess (if any) of—
 (I)the dollar amount in effect under subsection (d)(3)(B) for the taxable year, multiplied by 3, over (II)the average annual wages of the employer for such taxable year, and
 (ii)the denominator of which is the dollar amount so in effect under subsection (d)(3)(B), multiplied by 2, and
 (B)1.. (c)Extension of credit periodParagraph (2) of section 45R(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 2-consecutive-taxable year period and all that follows and inserting “3-consecutive-taxable year period beginning with the first taxable year beginning after 2014 in which—

 (A)the employer (or any predecessor) offers one or more qualified health plans to its employees through an Exchange, and
 (B)the employer (or any predecessor) claims the credit under this section.. (d)Average annual wage limitationSubparagraph (B) of section 45R(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:

 (B)Dollar amountFor purposes of paragraph (1)(B) and subsection (c)(2), the dollar amount in effect under this paragraph is the amount equal to 110 percent of the poverty line (within the meaning of section 36B(d)(3)) for a family of 4..
 (e)Elimination of uniform percentage contribution requirementParagraph (4) of section 45R(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking a uniform percentage (not less than 50 percent) and inserting at least 50 percent. (f)Elimination of cap relating to average local premiumsSubsection (b) of section 45R of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking the lesser of and all that follows and inserting the aggregate amount of nonelective contributions the employer made on behalf of its employees during the taxable year under the arrangement described in subsection (d)(4) for premiums for qualified health plans offered by the employer to its employees through an Exchange..
 (g)Conforming amendment relating to annual wage limitationSubparagraph (B) of section 45R(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking twice and inserting three times. (h)Effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2016.


117 HR 572 IH: National Office of New Americans Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2021-01-28
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

I117th CONGRESS1st SessionH. R. 572IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESJanuary 28, 2021Ms. Meng (for herself, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. García of Illinois, Mr. Espaillat, Mr. Torres of New York, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Khanna, Ms. Norton, Mr. Smith of Washington, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Velázquez, Mrs. Napolitano, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mr. Evans, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mr. Neguse, Ms. Tlaib, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Cooper, Ms. Titus, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Bowman, Mr. Carson, Ms. Lee of California, Ms. Speier, Mr. Blumenauer, Mrs. Demings, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Mr. Gallego, Mr. Jones, Ms. Chu, Ms. Bush, Mrs. Torres of California, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Omar, Mr. Sires, Mr. Hastings, Mr. Takano, Mr. Swalwell, Mr. Gomez, Ms. Pressley, Ms. Pingree, Ms. Garcia of Texas, Mr. Lieu, Mrs. Trahan, Ms. Newman, Ms. Porter, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Kahele, Mr. Auchincloss, Mr. Horsford, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Case, Mr. Crow, Ms. Matsui, and Mr. Cicilline) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concernedA BILLTo establish the National Office of New Americans within the Executive Office of the President, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the National Office of New Americans Act.2.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)DirectorThe term Director means the Director of the National Office of New Americans.(2)Federal agencyThe term Federal agency has the meaning given the term agency in section 551 of title 5, United States Code.(3)OfficeThe term Office means the National Office of New Americans established by section 3(a).3.National Office of New Americans(a)EstablishmentThere is established within the Executive Office of the President an office to be known as the National Office of New Americans.(b)PurposesThe purposes of the Office are the following:(1)To welcome and support immigrants and refugees in the United States.(2)To promote and support immigrant and refugee integration into, and inclusion in, the social, cultural, economic, and civic life of the United States.(3)To ensure that the Federal Government and Federal agencies promote the pursuit of United States citizenship among immigrants and refugees.(4)To ensure access to quality English language learning programs that support the successful integration of immigrant adults, including by enhancing—(A)employment and career prospects and economic integration; and(B)social integration in local communities and participation in civic life, including engagement with State and local governments, schools, and private and nonprofit community institutions.(5)To improve access to workforce development programs, including by ensuring that such programs meet the demand and the unique language, training, and educational needs of immigrants and refugees.(6)To coordinate the efforts of Federal, State, and local entities to support the effective social, economic, linguistic, and civic integration of immigrants, refugees, and the children of immigrants and refugees.(7)To provide advice and leadership to the President, Members of Congress, and other Federal Government officials on the challenges and opportunities facing such entities with respect to immigrant and refugee integration.(8)To evaluate the scale, quality, and effectiveness of Federal Government efforts with respect to immigrant and refugee social and economic integration, including access to United States citizenship, English language learning, education, and workforce development programs.(9)To identify the anticipated effects of new Federal policies on existing integration efforts and advise the President on how to address potential integration needs and the effects of such policies.(10)With respect to immigrant and refugee integration efforts, to consult on a biannual basis with State and local government officials on challenges and opportunities presented by such efforts.(11)With respect to the activities described in paragraphs (8) through (10), to ensure the inclusion of the perspectives of immigrants and refugees.(12)To submit to the President and the appropriate committees of Congress a biannual report that describes the activities of the Office and the results of the consultation processes described in paragraphs (8) through (11).(c)Director(1)In generalThe Office shall be headed by a Director, who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.(2)ResponsibilitiesThe Director shall—(A)establish policies, objectives, and priorities for the Office with respect to immigrant and refugee integration;(B)with the assistance of the Deputy Director for Citizenship and Inclusion, the Deputy Director for Workforce and the Economy, the Deputy Director for Children's Integration Success, and the Associate Director of State and Local Affairs, carry out the purposes of the Office, as described in subsection (b);(C)serve as the Chair of the Federal Initiative for New Americans established under section 4;(D)make recommendations to the President on changes in the organization, management, programs, and budget of the Federal agencies to promote the integration of immigrants and refugees;(E)with respect to efforts to promote United States citizenship and the integration of immigrants and refugees, consult, support, and coordinate with State and local governments; and(F)serve as a member of the Domestic Policy Council and the National Economic Council.(3)Powers of the directorIn carrying out the responsibilities under paragraph (2) and the purposes under subsection (b), the Director may—(A)select, appoint, employ, and fix compensation of such officers and employees as may be necessary to carry out such responsibilities and purposes;(B)with the concurrence of the head of the applicable Federal agency, direct the temporary reassignment within the Federal Government of personnel employed by such Federal agency;(C)use for administrative purposes, on a reimbursable basis, the available services, equipment, personnel, and facilities of Federal, State, and local agencies;(D)procure the services of experts and consultants, in accordance with section 3109 of title 5, United States Code (relating to appointments in the Federal service) at rates of compensation for individuals not to exceed the daily equivalent of the rate of pay payable for level GS–18 of the General Schedule under section 5332 of title 5, United States Code;(E)accept and use donations of property from Federal, State, and local government agencies;(F)use the mail in the same manner as other Federal agencies; and(G)monitor the implementation of immigrant and refugee integration-related activities of the Federal Government, including by—(i)conducting program and performance audits and evaluations of each Federal agency; and(ii)requesting assistance from the Inspector General of the applicable Federal agency in such audits and evaluations.(d)Deputy directors(1)In generalThere shall be in the Office a Deputy Director for Citizenship and Inclusion, a Deputy Director for Workforce and the Economy, and a Deputy Director for Children's Integration and Success, each of whom shall be appointed by the President, in consultation with the Director.(2)Responsibilities(A)Deputy Director for Citizenship and InclusionThe Deputy Director for Citizenship and Inclusion shall, among other duties as assigned by the Director, assist the Director in promoting—(i)inclusion of immigrants and refugees in the social, economic, and civic life of their communities and the United States; and(ii)access to United States citizenship.(B)Deputy Director for Workforce and the EconomyThe Deputy Director for Workforce and the Economy shall, among other duties as assigned by the Director, assist the Director in—(i)promoting participation of immigrants and refugees in the United States workforce; and(ii)increasing the contributions of immigrants and refugees to the United States economy.(C)Deputy Director for Children's Integration SuccessThe Deputy Director for Children's Integration Success shall, among other duties as assigned by the Director, assist the Director in ensuring that Federal policies and programs intended to support the healthy development and educational success of children are effective in reaching and serving the children of immigrant families.(e)Bureau of State and Local Affairs(1)In generalThere is established within the Office a Bureau of State and Local Affairs.(2)Associate director(A)In generalThe Bureau of State and Local Affairs shall be headed by an Associate Director of State and Local Affairs, who shall be appointed by the President, in consultation with the Director.(B)DutiesThe Associate Director of State and Local Affairs shall, among other duties as assigned by the Director, assist the Director in coordinating the efforts of State and local entities to support the economic, linguistic, and civic integration of immigrants, refugees, and the children of immigrants and refugees.(f)LimitationAn individual may not serve as Director, Deputy Director for Citizenship and Inclusion, Deputy Director for Workforce and the Economy, Deputy Director for Children's Integration Success, or Associate Director of State and Local Affairs while serving in any other position in the Federal Government.(g)Access by CongressThe establishment of the Office within the Executive Office of the President shall not affect access to the Office by a Member of Congress or any member of a committee of the Senate or the House of Representatives, including access to—(1)any information, document, or study in the possession of, or conducted by or at the direction of, the Director; or(2)personnel of the Office.4.Federal Initiative on New Americans(a)EstablishmentNot later than 180 days after the confirmation of the Director of the Office, the Director shall establish within the Office a Federal Initiative on New Americans (referred to in this section as the Initiative).(b)PurposeThe purposes of the Initiative are—(1)to welcome and support immigrants and refugees in the United States;(2)to establish a coordinated Federal program to respond effectively to immigrant and refugee integration issues; and(3)to advise and assist the Director in identifying and implementing the necessary policies to carry out such program.(c)MembershipThe Initiative shall be composed of—(1)the Director, who shall serve as Chair;(2)the Secretary of the Treasury;(3)the Attorney General;(4)the Secretary of Commerce;(5)the Secretary of Labor;(6)the Secretary of Health and Human Services;(7)the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development;(8)the Secretary of Education;(9)the Secretary of Homeland Security;(10)the Secretary of State;(11)the Director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement;(12)the Director of the Small Business Administration;(13)the Director of the Office of Management and Budget;(14)the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection; and(15)any other individual—(A)invited by the Director to participate; and(B)who occupies a position listed under level I or II of the Executive Schedule, as provided in sections 5312 and 5313 of title 5, United States Code.(d)Duties(1)In generalThe Initiative shall meet at the call of the Chair and perform such duties as the Chair reasonably requires.(2)Coordinated response to immigrant and refugee issuesThe Initiative shall join with Federal agencies in providing a coordinated Federal response to adequately address matters that affect the lives of immigrant and refugee families and local communities with growing immigrant and refugee populations, including access to—(A)English language learning;(B)adult education and workforce training;(C)occupational licensure;(D)early childhood care and education;(E)elementary, secondary, and postsecondary education;(F)health care;(G)naturalization;(H)civic engagement;(I)immigration assistance and legal services;(J)economic development;(K)language access services; and(L)other services the Director identifies as aiding the integration of immigrants and refugees into the social, cultural, economic, and civic life of the United States.(3)Liaison with Federal agencies(A)In generalEach member of the Initiative shall serve as a liaison to the Federal agency of the member to ensure that the Federal agency coordinates with and responds to the recommendations of the Initiative in a timely and meaningful manner.(B)Duties of a liaisonThe duties of each member as a Federal agency liaison include—(i)developing, for the applicable Federal agency, immigrant and refugee integration goals and indicators;(ii)implementing the biannual consultation process described in section 3(b)(10) by consulting with the State and local counterparts of the Federal agency;(iii)reporting to the Initiative on the progress made by the Federal agency in achieving the goals and indicators described in clause (i); and(iv)upon request by the Director and subject to laws governing disclosure of information, providing such information as may be required to carry out the responsibilities of the Director and the functions of the Office.(4)Recommendations of the InitiativeNot later than 1 year after the date on which the Initiative becomes fully operational, and every 2 years thereafter, the Director shall submit to Congress a report that includes the following:(A)Findings from the consultation process described in section 3(b)(10), including a description of the immigrant and refugee integration opportunities offered by, and integration challenges facing, State and local governments.(B)An assessment of the effects of, and recommendations with respect to, pending legislation and executive branch policy proposals.(C)A description of the possible effects of pending legislation and executive branch policy proposals on immigrant and refugee integration.(D)An identification of any Federal program or policy that has a negative impact on immigrants, refugees, and local communities with growing immigrant and refugee populations, as compared to the general population, and recommendations for changes to any such program or policy.(E)Recommendations on legislative solutions to better support the successful integration of immigrants and refugees and the children of immigrants and refugees.


115 HRES 674 IH: Honoring the life and legacy of Alan Rabinowitz for his immeasurable contributions to the city of Seattle as a leading philanthropist, educator, community organizer, and public servant.
U.S. House of Representatives
2018-01-02
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

IV115th CONGRESS1st SessionH. RES. 674IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESJanuary 2, 2018Ms. Jayapal submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government ReformRESOLUTIONHonoring the life and legacy of Alan Rabinowitz for his immeasurable contributions to the city of
			 Seattle as a leading philanthropist, educator, community organizer, and
			 public servant.

 Whereas Alan Rabinowitz was born on January 18, 1927, in New York, New York; Whereas Alan Rabinowitz served in the United States Navy during World War II;
 Whereas Alan Rabinowitz received his bachelor’s degree in government and philosophy at Yale University, his master’s degree in business administration at Harvard University, and his doctorate degree in urban studies from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology;
 Whereas in 1951, Alan Rabinowitz married Andrea Wolf, his lifelong love and partner with whom he raised four children, traveled the world, and worked for social justice;
 Whereas Alan Rabinowitz left an indelible imprint on the University of Washington as a professor of urban economics, and as chairman of the Department of Urban Planning for more than 14 years;
 Whereas Alan Rabinowitz authored seven books, including one in 1990 entitled Social Change Philanthropy in America, which was described as the first comprehensive analysis of philanthropy that focuses on improving American society and the environment, particularly for people of color and low-income people;
 Whereas Alan Rabinowitz led by example as a community organizer, working on economic development projects in Eastern Europe and Native American reservations with his partner, Andrea;
 Whereas Alan Rabinowitz helped establish and served on the founding boards of numerous organizations that changed the landscape of communities in Seattle and across the country, including the Social Justice Fund Northwest, the Seattle People’s Fund, Potlatch Fund, and Town Hall, and on the boards of the National Network of Grantmakers, the Peppercorn Foundation, and the Burke Museum;
 Whereas Alan Rabinowitz was instrumental in creating an endowment fund for the Washington chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, and a strong and early supporter of organizations like OneAmerica;
 Whereas Alan Rabinowitz passed away on November 29, 2017, in his beloved city of Seattle, Washington, leaving behind an extraordinary legacy of social change; and
 Whereas Alan Rabinowitz selflessly dedicated his life to building a kinder, more just world for the people: Now, therefore, be it

 That the House of Representatives honors the life and legacy of Alan Rabinowitz and acknowledges his contributions to economic justice, education, civil rights, social justice, and the arts.


		III
		110th CONGRESS
		1st Session
		S. RES. 144
		IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

			April 10, 2007
			Ms. Stabenow (for
			 herself and Mr. Levin) submitted the
			 following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

		RESOLUTION
		Honoring the Michigan State University
		  Spartans on winning the 2007 Men's National Collegiate Hockey
		  Championship.

		Whereas, on Saturday, April 7, 2007, the Michigan State
			 University (MSU) Men’s Hockey Team won the 2007 Men’s Hockey National
			 Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Championship by defeating Boston College
			 by a score of 3 to 1;
		Whereas entering the final period with a one-goal deficit,
			 the Spartans rallied to tie the game at 1 to 1, and with 18.9 seconds remaining
			 in regulation, scored the go-ahead goal to secure MSU Hockey's third national
			 championship, and first since 1986;
		Whereas the MSU Spartans won the NCAA Midwest Regional in
			 Grand Rapids, Michigan, to qualify for the Frozen Four finals, making them the
			 first Central Collegiate Hockey Association team to reach the tournament finals
			 since 1998;
		Whereas each member of the MSU Hockey organization made
			 essential contributions to the team’s success, including players Justin
			 Abdelkader, Tim Crowder, Jeff Dunne, Tyler Howells, Brandon Gentile, Ethan
			 Graham, Bobby Jarosz, Justin Johnston, Tim Kennedy, Kurt Kivisto, Chris
			 Lawrence, Bryan Lerg, Jeff Lerg, Zak McClellan, Jim McKenzie, Steve Mnich,
			 Chris Mueller, Michael Ratchuk, Matt Schepke, Chris Snavely, Jay Sprague,
			 Daniel Sturges, Nick Sucharski, Ryan Turek, Daniel Vukovic, and Brandon Warner,
			 Head Coach Rick Comley, Assistant Coaches Tom Newton and Brian Renfrew, and
			 Athletic Trainer Dave Carrier;
		Whereas MSU Spartans’ Head Coach Rick Comley, who was
			 named a 2007 National Coach of the Year finalist, became the third coach in
			 college hockey history to win national titles at two institutions, the first
			 with Northern Michigan University, and has recorded over 700 career victories,
			 making him the third winningest coach amongst active coaches, and fifth
			 winningest in NCAA history;
		Whereas at the Frozen Four Championship game in St. Louis,
			 a record 19,432 people attended and the enthusiasm shown by the people of
			 Michigan and the student body of Michigan State University clearly demonstrates
			 Michigan’s strong support for the MSU Hockey organization and the determined
			 effort of all the team’s players;
		Whereas MSU Hockey's third NCAA title will be celebrated
			 in East Lansing, Michigan on Tuesday, April 10, 2007, and its members honored
			 with a parade followed by a rally at Munn Ice Arena;
		Whereas the families and friends of the team have provided
			 unwavering support and have tirelessly cheered on their Spartans;
		Whereas after many trials and tribulations in the later
			 part of the season, the Spartans rallied together with unrivaled team character
			 and focus to clinch the NCAA title;
		Whereas Michigan State University has always stood as a
			 center for excellence in both athletics and scholarship, under the current
			 leadership of University President Lou Anna K. Simon, and Athletic Director and
			 renowned former MSU Hockey coach Ron Mason;
		Whereas the MSU Spartans displayed unparalleled team
			 camaraderie and have shown their ability to unite both on and off the ice,
			 which led to hard-fought victories throughout the season; and
		Whereas the Spartan Men's Hockey Team demonstrated
			 superior strength, skill, perseverance, and determination during the 2006–2007
			 season and has made Michigan State University and the entire State of Michigan
			 proud: Now, therefore, be it

		That the Senate—
			(1)congratulates the
			 Michigan State University Men’s Hockey Team on winning the 2007 National
			 Collegiate Athletic Association Championship and recognizes all the players,
			 coaches, staff, fans, families, and others who were instrumental in this great
			 achievement; and
			(2)directs the
			 Secretary of the Senate to transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to
			 Michigan State University and to the MSU Spartans Men’s Hockey Team for
			 appropriate display.


		III
		111th CONGRESS
		1st Session
		S. RES. 383
		IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

			December 21
			 (legislative day, December 20), 2009
			Mr. McCain (for himself,
			 Mr. Kerry, Mrs.
			 Lincoln, Mr. Inouye,
			 Mr. Begich, Mr.
			 Feingold, Mr. Specter,
			 Mr. Grassley, Mr. Burr, Ms.
			 Collins, Ms. Murkowski, and
			 Mr. Cochran) submitted the following
			 resolution; which was considered and agreed to

		RESOLUTION
		Designating January 2010 as National
		  Mentoring Month.

		Whereas mentoring is a longstanding tradition in which a
			 dependable, caring adult provides guidance, support, and encouragement to
			 facilitate a young person’s social, emotional, and cognitive
			 development;
		Whereas continued research on mentoring shows that formal,
			 high-quality mentoring focused on developing the competence and character of
			 the mentee promotes positive outcomes, such as improved academic achievement,
			 self-esteem, social skills, and career development;
		Whereas further research on mentoring provides strong
			 evidence that mentoring successfully reduces substance use and abuse, academic
			 failure, and delinquency;
		Whereas mentoring, in addition to preparing young people
			 for school, work, and life, is extremely rewarding for those serving as
			 mentors;
		Whereas more than 4,700 mentoring programs in communities
			 of all sizes across the United States focus on building strong, effective
			 relationships between mentors and mentees;
		Whereas approximately 3,000,000 young people in the United
			 States are in solid mentoring relationships due to the remarkable vigor,
			 creativity, and resourcefulness of the thousands of mentoring programs in
			 communities throughout the Nation;
		Whereas in spite of the progress made to increase
			 mentoring, the United States has a serious mentoring gap, with
			 nearly 15,000,000 young people in need of mentors;
		Whereas mentoring partnerships between the public and
			 private sectors bring State and local leaders together to support mentoring
			 programs by preventing duplication of efforts, offering training in industry
			 best practices, and making the most of limited resources to benefit young
			 people in the United States;
		Whereas the designation of January 2010 as National
			 Mentoring Month will help call attention to the critical role mentors
			 play in helping young people realize their potential;
		Whereas a month-long celebration of mentoring will
			 encourage more individuals and organizations, including schools, businesses,
			 nonprofit organizations, faith institutions, and foundations, to become engaged
			 in mentoring across the United States; and
		Whereas National Mentoring Month will, most significantly,
			 build awareness of mentoring and encourage more people to become mentors and
			 help close the mentoring gap in the United States: Now, therefore, be it

		That the Senate—
			(1)designates the
			 month of January 2010 as National Mentoring Month;
			(2)recognizes with
			 gratitude the contributions of the millions of caring adults and students who
			 are already volunteering as mentors and encourages more adults and students to
			 volunteer as mentors; and
			(3)encourages the
			 people of the United States to observe National Mentoring Month with
			 appropriate ceremonies and activities that promote awareness of, and volunteer
			 involvement with, youth mentoring.


117 HRES 447 IH: Supporting the designation of May 28, 2021, as “National Food Allergy Prevention Awareness Day” to raise awareness and encourage the prevention of severe food allergies among children.
U.S. House of Representatives
2021-05-28
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

IV117th CONGRESS1st SessionH. RES. 447IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESMay 28, 2021Ms. Brownley (for herself, Ms. Matsui, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Cicilline, and Mr. Morelle) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and CommerceRESOLUTIONSupporting the designation of May 28, 2021, as National Food Allergy Prevention Awareness Day to raise awareness and encourage the prevention of severe food allergies among children.Whereas 32,000,000 Americans live with food allergies, including many that are life-threatening, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that the prevalence of food allergies in children increased by 50 percent between 1997 and 2011;Whereas food allergies have an enormous impact on quality of life for the 1 in 13 children who develop a severe food allergy, and one-third of children over the age of 5 with allergies are bullied for their allergy;Whereas there is an annual cost to families in the United States of nearly $25,000,000,000 per year, not including the impact to quality of life;Whereas many children who develop a food allergy do not have a family history of food allergies, and therefore the family is much less aware of the life-changing consequences of developing a food allergy and the need for food allergy prevention;Whereas research has shown that early introduction has shown promise in reducing the impact of food allergies in studies where parents feed peanuts and eggs, allergenic foods, to their babies as early as 4 to 6 months of age;Whereas the 2020–2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, published by the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Health and Human Services, and medical guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases already recommend early allergen introduction to help prevent food allergies; andWhereas the FASTER Act of 2021 (Public Law 117–11) highlights sesame as an important allergenic food, and prioritizes food allergy research opportunities to examine prevention and develop more effective treatment, and ultimately, a cure: Now, therefore, be itThat the House of Representatives—(1)supports the designation of National Food Allergy Prevention Awareness Day;(2)recognizes—(A)the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases for funding the initial food allergy prevention research through the Learning Early About Peanut Allergy trial; and(B)the advocacy community for its work to educate parents about food allergy prevention;(3)encourages health care providers, the public health community, businesses, individuals, and Federal, State, and local governments, to work together to raise awareness of food allergy prevention to reduce the number of individuals in the United States who have severe food allergies; and(4)encourages State and Federal health agencies to further expand research in food allergy prevention and into how we can dramatically reduce food allergies in the United States.


117 HRES 665 IH: Commemorating the 10th anniversary of the repeal of the “Dont Ask, Dont Tell, Don't Pursue” policy.
U.S. House of Representatives
2021-09-20
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

IV
117th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 665
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

September 20, 2021
Mr. Takano (for himself, Mr. Pappas, and Mr. Pocan) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

RESOLUTION
Commemorating the 10th anniversary of the repeal of the Dont Ask, Dont Tell, Don't Pursue policy.

Whereas 10 years ago, on September 20, 2011, the repeal of the policy known as Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Don’t Pursue took effect, officially allowing lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) members of the Armed Forces to serve openly and without concealing their sexual orientation; Whereas the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy, which held that [t]he presence in the armed forces of persons who demonstrate a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion which are the essence of military capability, was codified in the fiscal year 1994 National Defense Authorization Act, which was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 30, 1993;
Whereas, under Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, any member of the Armed Forces that stated they were homosexual or bisexual, engaged or attempted to engage in homosexual acts, or married or attempted to marry someone of the same sex could be discharged for violating policy; however, the law itself did not prevent servicemembers from being asked about their sexuality; Whereas, while the intention of the policy was to eliminate the outright ban on LGBTQ members in the military that existed prior to 1993, it created an environment which permitted LGBTQ individuals to serve on the condition that they never identify themselves as nonheterosexual, either through actions or words;
Whereas, in the 18-year span that Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell served as official policy, over 13,000 servicemembers were discharged as a result of the policy; Whereas the experience of swearing to uphold an uncompromising oath of integrity while actively hiding their sexual orientation had significant psychological impacts on LGBTQ servicemembers, as well as both long- and short-term mental and physical impacts;
Whereas surveys of LGBTQ veterans that served under Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell and predecessor policies that forced the concealment of LGBTQ identity reveal heightened instances of panic attacks, phobias, substance abuse, and other mental health conditions, including a heightened risk of suicide, independent of already-existing combat and service-related mental health risks; Whereas female members of the Armed Forces were particularly impacted by Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, and in 2007, women comprised only about 15 percent of military personnel but nearly 50 percent of the discharges under the policy, likely due to the heightened vulnerability of women in the military to sexual harassment and the subsequent retaliation of harassers against women;
Whereas many servicemembers who were discharged under Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell received discharge paperwork, known as DD Form 214, with stigmatizing and identifying codes indicating homosexuality as the reason for separation, recorded on the same paperwork that is used to screen veterans for employment, access Department of Veterans Affairs benefits and services, and determine eligibility for reenlistment, meaning that veterans could still face discrimination and be denied access to these opportunities long after leaving the military; Whereas there are countless individual impacts that resulted from Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell which cannot be easily quantified or categorized, including the stresses of maintaining secrecy with health care providers and law enforcement, isolation or alienation from peers, and persistent fear of discovery, to name a few common experiences;
Whereas, by the nature of the policy, there was no mechanism by which an active servicemember could openly protest, give testimony, or otherwise publicly speak about their experience serving under Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell without risking investigation and discharge; Whereas LGBTQ members of the Armed Forces nonetheless demonstrated great resiliency and courage, creating underground networks to offer support to one another and covertly supplying anonymous information on LGBTQ experiences in the military to Pentagon researchers for the 2010 Department of Defense report that outlined the path to repeal;
Whereas, after nearly two decades of activism and advocacy, the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010 was signed on December 22, 2010, by President Barack Obama; and Whereas the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell repeal was certified to comply with Department of Defense recommendations and standards on July 22, 2011, and took effect 60 days later on September 20, 2011: Now, therefore, be it

That the House of Representatives— (1)recognizes the deep and lasting harm caused by the policy known as Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Don’t Pursue, as well as other policies of the Armed Forces that had an adverse and prejudicial impact on its members;
(2)commemorates the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell as a day in which members of the military, regardless of their sexual orientation, were free to serve openly and to be honored for their service without caveat; and (3)reaffirms its commitment to honor the service of all members of the military, both former and current, regardless of their gender identity or sexual orientation, and continue working to foster inclusion and diversity in the Armed Forces.


		I
		111th CONGRESS
		1st Session
		H. R. 4278
		IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

			December 10, 2009
			Mr. Neal of
			 Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. Brady of
			 Texas, Mr. Blumenauer,
			 Mr. Herger,
			 Mr. DeFazio,
			 Mr. Rehberg,
			 Mr. Lynch, and
			 Mr. Dent) introduced the following
			 bill; which was referred to the Committee
			 on Ways and Means

		A BILL
		To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a
		  reduced rate of excise tax on beer produced domestically by certain small
		  producers.

		1.Reduced rate of excise tax on
			 beer produced domestically by certain small producers
			(a)In
			 generalParagraph (2) of
			 section 5051(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended—
				(1)by redesignating
			 subparagraphs (B) and (C) as subparagraphs (C) and (D), respectively,
			 and
				(2)by striking
			 subparagraph (A) and inserting the following new subparagraphs:

						(A)In
				generalIn the case of a
				brewer who produces not more than 6,000,000 barrels of beer during the calendar
				year, the per barrel rate of tax imposed by this section shall be—
							(i)$3.50 on the first
				60,000 qualified barrels of production, and
							(ii)$16 on the first
				1,940,000 qualified barrels of production to which clause (i) does not
				apply.
							(B)Qualified
				barrels of productionFor purposes of this paragraph, the term
				qualified barrels of production means, with respect to any brewer
				for any calendar year, the number of barrels of beer which are removed in such
				year for consumption or sale and which have been brewed or produced by such
				brewer at qualified breweries in the United
				States.
						.
				(b)Conforming
			 amendments
				(1)Subparagraph (C) of section 5051(a)(2) of
			 such Code, as redesignated by this section, is amended—
					(A)by striking
			 2,000,000 barrel quantity and inserting 6,000,000 barrel
			 quantity, and
					(B)by striking
			 60,000 barrel quantity and inserting 60,000 and 1,940,000
			 barrel quantities.
					(2)Subparagraph (D)
			 of such section, as so redesignated, is amended by striking 2,000,000
			 barrels and inserting 6,000,000 barrels.
				(c)Effective
			 dateThe amendments made by this section shall apply to beer
			 removed during calendar years beginning after the date of the enactment of this
			 Act.


113 HR 3065 IH: To repeal the War Powers Resolution.
U.S. House of Representatives
2013-09-09
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

		I
		113th CONGRESS
		1st Session
		H. R. 3065
		IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

			September 9, 2013
			Mr. Garrett
			 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
			 Committee on Foreign
			 Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on
			 Rules, for a period to be
			 subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such
			 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee
			 concerned

		A BILL
		To repeal the War Powers Resolution.

		1.Repeal of War Powers
			 ResolutionThe War Powers
			 Resolution (Public Law 93–148; 50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.) is repealed.


II
110th CONGRESS 1st Session
S. 28
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

January 4, 2007
Mr. Kohl introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require the use of generic drugs under the Medicare part D prescription drug program when available unless the brand name drug is determined to be medically necessary.

1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Generics First Act of 2007.
2.Required use of generic drugs under the Medicare part D prescription drug program
(a)In generalSection 1860D–2(e)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–102(e)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

(C)Non-generic drugs unless certain requirements are met
(i)In generalSuch term does not include a drug that is a nongeneric drug unless—
(I)no generic drug has been approved under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to the drug; or
(II)the nongeneric drug is determined to be medically necessary by the individual prescribing the drug and prior authorization for the drug is obtained from the Secretary.
(ii)DefinitionsIn this subparagraph:
(I)Generic drugThe term generic drug means a drug that is the subject of an application approved under subsection (b)(2) or (j) of section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, for which the Secretary has made a determination that the drug is the therapeutic equivalent of a listed drug under section 505(j)(7) of such Act.
(II)Nongeneric drugThe term nongeneric drug means a drug that is the subject of an application approved under—
(aa)section 505(b)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; or
(bb)section 505(b)(2) of such Act and that has been determined to be not therapeutically equivalent to any listed drug. .
(b)Effective dateThe amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to drugs dispensed on or after the date of enactment of this Act.


109 HR 3515 IH: Truth in Automobile Insurance Rates Act of 2005
U.S. House of Representatives
2005-07-28
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

I
109th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 3515
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

July 28, 2005
Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL
To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to require persons who are plan administrators of employee pension benefit plans or provide administrative services to such plans, and who also provide automobile insurance coverage or provide persons offering such coverage identifying information relating to plan participants or beneficiaries, to submit to the Federal Trade Commission certain information relating to such automobile insurance coverage.

1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Truth in Automobile Insurance Rates Act of 2005.
2.Information required to be submitted to the Federal Trade Commission relating to automobile insurance coverage
(a)In generalSection 101 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1021) is amended—
(1)by redesignating subsection (j) as subsection (k); and
(2)by inserting after subsection (i) the following new subsection:

(j)Submission to the Federal Trade Commission of certain information relating to automobile insurance coverage
(1)In generalAny person who is, during any calendar year, the plan administrator of an employee pension benefit plan or provides administrative services to such a plan and who—
(A)also offers automobile insurance coverage during such year in a State in which a participant or beneficiary under the plan resides, or
(B)provides during such calendar year to any person offering automobile insurance coverage in such state any identifying information relating to any participant or beneficiary under the plan, shall provide annually to the Federal Trade Commission the information described in paragraph (2). Such person shall certify annually to the Secretary compliance with the requirements of this subsection.
(2)Required information
(A)In generalThe information described in this paragraph consists of the following:
(i)The total amount collected in the year reported on, by each person specified in subparagraph (B), in insurance premiums on automobile insurance from automobile insurance policyholders in the State.
(ii)The total amount that each person specified in subparagraph (B) paid out in the year reported on in automobile insurance claims in response to the claims filed by automobile insurance policyholders in such State.
(iii)The total amount added in the year reported on, by each person specified in subparagraph (B), to such person’s reserve balance for automobile insurance claims filed by automobile insurance policyholders in such State.
(B)Specified personsThe persons specified in this subparagraph are the person described in paragraph (1), each person provided identifying information (as described in paragraph (1)(B)) by the person described in paragraph (1), and each person related to any of the foregoing.
(3)Related personFor purposes of this subsection—
(A)a person is related to any other person if such persons are under common control, and
(B)the determination of whether two or more persons are under common control shall be made under regulations of the Secretary which are consistent and coextensive with regulations prescribed for similar purposes by the Secretary of the Treasury under subsections (b) and (c) of section 414 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986..
3.Effective dateThe amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2007.


110 HRES 603 IH: Expressing the sense of the House of

U.S. House of Representatives
2007-08-01
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

		IV
		110th CONGRESS
		1st Session
		H. RES. 603
		IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

			August 1, 2007
			Mr. Hastings of
			 Florida submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the
			 Committee on Foreign
			 Affairs

		RESOLUTION
		Expressing the sense of the House of
		  Representatives on the announcement of the Government of the Russian Federation
		  of its intention to suspend implementation of the Treaty on Conventional Armed
		  Forces in Europe.

		Whereas the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe,
			 signed at Paris on November 19, 1990 (the CFE Treaty), was agreed upon and
			 signed by 22 countries in order to establish parity, transparency, and
			 stability in the balance of conventional military forces and equipment in an
			 area of Europe stretching from the Atlantic Ocean to the Ural Mountains;
		Whereas there are now 30 countries that are party to the
			 CFE Treaty, including Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada,
			 Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland,
			 Italy, Kazakhstan, Luxembourg, Moldova, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal,
			 Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, and the
			 United States;
		Whereas the CFE Treaty is recognized as one of the most
			 successful arms control agreements of the modern era and has served as a
			 cornerstone of European security as the continent emerged from the shadows of
			 the Cold War;
		Whereas the CFE Treaty facilitated the destruction or
			 conversion of over 52,000 battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, artillery
			 pieces, combat aircraft, and attack helicopters;
		Whereas the CFE Treaty continues to enable an
			 unprecedented level of transparency into military equipment holdings and troop
			 deployments in Europe, including over 4,000 on-site inspections of military
			 units and installations implemented since the entry into force of the
			 Treaty;
		Whereas, on November 19, 1999, at the Organization for
			 Security and Co-operation in Europe Summit in Istanbul, Turkey, the parties to
			 the CFE Treaty signed an Adaptation Agreement to account for the demise of the
			 Warsaw Pact, the expansion of membership in the North Atlantic Treaty
			 Organization (NATO), and other changes in the European geopolitical
			 environment;
		Whereas, at the time of the signing of the Adaptation
			 Agreement, the Russian Federation made a series of pledges, known as the
			 Istanbul Commitments, to withdraw remaining military forces and equipment from
			 the territory of Georgia and Moldova or to otherwise negotiate consensual
			 agreements on their continued presence;
		Whereas, while the Government of the Russian Federation
			 has taken initial steps towards fulfilling the Istanbul Commitments, it
			 continues to maintain troops and associated equipment in both Georgia and
			 Moldova without the express sovereign consent of the government of either of
			 those countries, and the United States and other parties to the CFE Treaty have
			 therefore refrained from taking steps to ratify the Adaptation
			 Agreement;
		Whereas, on April 26, 2007, President of the Russian
			 Federation Vladimir Putin, on the occasion of his last State of the Union
			 speech, announced an unspecified moratorium on Russian
			 compliance with the CFE Treaty, citing the refusal of NATO Members to ratify
			 the Adaptation Agreement, concerns over the proposed United States missile
			 defense deployment in Poland and the Czech Republic, and new basing
			 arrangements between the Government of the United States and the Governments of
			 Poland, Bulgaria, and Romania as unacceptable encroachments on the security of
			 Russia;
		Whereas the Government of the Russian Federation
			 subsequently requested, as is its right under the CFE Treaty, an Extraordinary
			 Conference to discuss its outstanding concerns, which was held from June 12 to
			 June 15, 2007;
		Whereas, on July 14, 2007, President Putin issued a formal
			 decree announcing the intention of the Russian Federation to suspend compliance
			 with the CFE Treaty after providing 150 days advance notice to the other CFE
			 Treaty signatories;
		Whereas President Putin justified the decision of the
			 Government of the Russian Federation on account of extraordinary
			 circumstances that affect the security of the Russian Federation
			 and require immediate measures;
		Whereas, while the CFE Treaty provides a formal mechanism
			 for withdrawal of a country that is party to the Treaty following 150 days of
			 notice, it does not contain any such provision for suspension; and
		Whereas the Department of State, in responding to the
			 announcement by the Government of the Russian Federation to suspend compliance
			 with the CFE Treaty, declared, The United States is disappointed by the
			 Russian announcement of its intention to suspend implementation of the
			 Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty. The United States remains
			 committed to CFE’s full implementation. We also remain committed to the
			 ratification and entry into force of the Adapted CFE Treaty. We look forward to
			 continuing to engage with Russia and the other States Parties to the Treaty to
			 create the conditions necessary for ratification by all 30 CFE States.:
			 Now, therefore, be it

		That—
			(1)it
			 is the sense of the House of Representatives that the announcement of the
			 Government of the Russian Federation of its intention to suspend implementation
			 of the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris on
			 November 19, 1990 (the CFE Treaty), is a regrettable step and may unnecessarily
			 heighten tensions in Europe; and
			(2)the House of
			 Representatives—
				(A)recognizes the enduring value of the CFE
			 Treaty as a cornerstone of European security and a force for stability in the
			 transition of Europe from the Cold War to the modern era;
				(B)strongly urges the Government of the
			 Russian Federation to reconsider its intention to suspend CFE implementation
			 and engage with the other parties to the CFE Treaty in an intensive dialogue to
			 resolve outstanding problems and establish a foundation for the eventual
			 implementation of the Adaption Agreement to the CFE Treaty;
				(C)calls on the Russian Federation, in
			 accordance with that process, to fulfill the Istanbul Commitments of 1999 and
			 move speedily to withdraw all remaining forces and military equipment from
			 Georgia and Moldova;
				(D)strongly encourages all parties to the CFE
			 Treaty to engage the Russian Federation in seeking innovative and constructive
			 mechanisms to fully implement the Istanbul Commitments and thus facilitate the
			 rapid entry into force of the Adaptation Agreement; and
				(E)strongly encourages officials of the
			 Government of the Russian Federation to refrain from belligerent statements and
			 threats that only further polarize relations and jeopardize security in
			 Europe.


110 HR 7044 IH: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a

U.S. House of Representatives
2008-09-24
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

		I
		110th CONGRESS
		2d Session
		H. R. 7044
		IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

			September 24, 2008
			Mr. English of
			 Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. Brady
			 of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
			 Committee on Ways and
			 Means

		A BILL
		To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a
		  temporary dividends received deduction for taxable years beginning in 2008 or
		  2009.

		1.Temporary dividends received
			 deduction allowed for 2008 or 2009
			(a)ElectionSubsection (f) of section 965 of the
			 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to election) is amended to read as
			 follows:

					(f)ElectionIn the case of any taxable year beginning
				after September 30, 2007, the taxpayer may elect to apply this section
				to—
						(1)the taxpayer’s
				last taxable year which begins before the date of the enactment of this
				subsection, or
						(2)the taxpayer’s
				first taxable year which begins during the 1-year period beginning on such
				date.
						Such
				election may be made for a taxable year only if made on or before the due date
				(including extensions) for filing the return of tax for such taxable
				year..
			(b)Failure To
			 maintain employment levelsSubsection (b) of section 965 of such
			 Code (relating to limitations) is amended by adding at the end the
			 following:

					(5)Reduction in
				benefits for failure to maintain employment levels
						(A)In
				generalIf, during the period consisting of the calendar month in
				which the taxpayer first receives a distribution described in paragraph (1) and
				the succeeding 23 calendar months, the taxpayer does not maintain an average
				employment level at least equal to the taxpayer’s prior average employment, an
				additional amount equal to $25,000 multiplied by the number of employees by
				which the taxpayers average employment level during such period falls below the
				prior average employment (but not exceeding the aggregate amount allowed as a
				deduction pursuant to paragraph (1)) shall be taken into income by the taxpayer
				during the taxable year that includes the final day of such period.
						(B)Prior average
				employmentFor purposes of this paragraph, the taxpayer’s
				prior average employment shall be the average number of
				employees of the taxpayer during the period consisting of the 24 calendar
				months immediately preceding the calendar month in which the taxpayer first
				receives a distribution described in paragraph (1).
						(C)Aggregation
				rulesIn determining the taxpayer’s average employment level and
				prior average employment, all domestic members of a controlled group shall be
				treated as a single
				taxpayer.
						.
			(c)Threshold
			 periodSection 965 of such Code is amended by striking
			 June 30, 2003 each place it occurs and inserting June 30,
			 2007.
			(d)Base
			 periodSubparagraph (A) of section 965(c)(2) of such Code (as
			 amended by subsection (c)) is amended to read as follows:

					(A)In
				generalThe base period years
				are the 3 taxable years—
						(i)which are among
				the 6 most recent taxable years ending on or before June 30, 2007, and
						(ii)which are
				determined by disregarding—
							(I)1 taxable year for
				which the sum of the amounts described in clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) of
				subsection (b)(2)(B) is the largest,
							(II)1 taxable year
				for which such sum is the smallest, and
							(III)the taxable year
				for which an election was made before the enactment of this subclause.
							.
			(e)Indebtedness
			 determination dateSubparagraph (B) of section 965(b)(3) of such
			 Code is amended by striking October 3, 2004 and inserting
			 September 24, 2008.
			(f)Effective
			 dateThe amendments made by
			 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the date of the
			 enactment of this Act.


117 SRES 216 IS: Recognizing the 150th anniversary of Alcorn State University, the oldest public historically Black land-grant university in the United States.
U.S. Senate
2021-05-13
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

III117th CONGRESS1st SessionS. RES. 216IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESMay 13, 2021Mr. Wicker (for himself and Mrs. Hyde-Smith) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and ForestryRESOLUTIONRecognizing the 150th anniversary of Alcorn State University, the oldest public historically Black land-grant university in the United States.Whereas May 13, 2021, marks the 150th anniversary of Alcorn State University—(1)the oldest public historically Black land-grant university in the United States; and(2)the second-oldest State-supported university in the State of Mississippi;Whereas the university now known as Alcorn State University was founded on May 13, 1871, in Lorman, Mississippi, as a result of efforts in the State to educate the descendants of formerly enslaved individuals;Whereas Alcorn State University derives its name from the sitting Governor of Mississippi at the time of its founding, James L. Alcorn;Whereas Hiram R. Revels, following his time in civic life as a United States Senator for the State of Mississippi, the first African-American Senator in the history of the United States, served as the first president of Alcorn State University;Whereas Alcorn State University consistently ranks among the top 25 historically Black colleges and universities in the United States by U.S. News & World Report;Whereas Alcorn State University—(1)provides a valuable education in various programs of study, including agriculture, arts, sciences, business, and education; and (2)offers the only nursing program available at a historically Black college and university in the State of Mississippi;Whereas a residential living option on the campus of Alcorn State University, the Medgar Wiley Evers Heritage Village, pays tribute to Medgar Evers, the civil rights leader and 1952 graduate of Alcorn State University;Whereas Alcorn State University alumnus Steve McNair led a decorated career in the National Football League (referred to in this preamble as the NFL), which began when he was drafted third overall in the 1995 NFL draft, the highest draft selection for an offensive player from a historically Black college and university in the history of the NFL; andWhereas the successes of Alcorn State University are tied to the dedicated leadership and faculty who devote their careers to preparing future generations for excellence in academics and athletics: Now, therefore, be itThat the Senate—(1)recognizes the 150th anniversary of Alcorn State University, the oldest public historically Black land-grant university in the United States; and(2)celebrates the invaluable contributions of Alcorn State University to higher education in the United States.


		III

		109th CONGRESS

		2d Session

		S. CON. RES. 86

		IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

			April 5, 2006

			Mr. Lautenberg (for

			 himself, Mrs. Clinton,

			 Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Kerry, Mr.

			 Kennedy, Mr. Johnson,

			 Mrs. Boxer, Mr.

			 Menendez, Ms. Landrieu, and

			 Mrs. Feinstein) submitted the following

			 concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

			 Committee on Rules and

			 Administration

		CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

		Directing the Architect of the Capitol to

		  establish a temporary exhibit in the rotunda of the Capitol to honor the memory

		  of the members of the United States Armed Forces who have lost their lives in

		  Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom.

		1.Exhibit in rotunda of the

			 Capitol in honor of members of armed forces killed in Iraq and

			 Afghanistan

			(a)Establishment of

			 temporary exhibitDuring the

			 period beginning on May 29, 2006, and ending on July 4, 2006, the Architect of

			 the Capitol shall display in the rotunda of the Capitol an exhibit to honor the

			 memory of the members of the United States Armed Forces who have lost their

			 lives in—

				(1)Operation Iraqi Freedom; and

				(2)Operation Enduring Freedom.

				(b)Form of

			 ExhibitThe exhibit displayed under this section shall be in such

			 form and contain such material as the Architect may select, so long as—

				(1)the exhibit

			 displays the name, photograph, and biographical information with respect to

			 each individual member of the United States Armed Forces who has lost his or

			 her life in the Operations referred to in subsection (a); and

				(2)the exhibit

			 provides—

					(A)an opportunity

			 for visitors to write messages of support and sympathy to the families of the

			 individuals represented in the exhibit; and

					(B)a means to ensure

			 that those messages are transmitted to the families.


117 HJ 46 IH: Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on March 13, 2020.
U.S. House of Representatives
2021-05-20
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

IA117th CONGRESS1st SessionH. J. RES. 46IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESMay 20, 2021Mr. Gosar (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Massie, Mr. Roy, Mr. Norman, Mr. Mast, and Mr. Weber of Texas) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and InfrastructureJOINT RESOLUTIONRelating to a national emergency declared by the President on March 13, 2020.That, pursuant to section 202 of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622), the national emergency declared by the finding of the President on March 13, 2020, in Proclamation 9994 (85 Fed. Reg. 15337) is hereby terminated.


115 S1785 IS: To prohibit the implementation of a policy change to permit small, non-locking knives on passenger aircraft.
U.S. Senate
2017-09-11
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

		II
		115th CONGRESS1st Session
		S. 1785
		IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

			September 11, 2017
			Mr. Markey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

		A BILL
		To prohibit the implementation of a policy change to permit small, non-locking knives on passenger
			 aircraft.

		1.Prohibition on implementation of policy change to permit small, non-locking knives on passenger
			 aircraft
 (a)In generalNotwithstanding any other provision of law, on and after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security may not implement any change to the prohibited items list of the Transportation Security Administration that would permit passengers to carry small, non-locking knives through passenger screening checkpoints at airports, into sterile areas at airports, or on board passenger aircraft.
 (b)Prohibited items list definedIn this section, the term prohibited items list means the list of items passengers are prohibited from carrying as accessible property or on their persons through passenger screening checkpoints at airports, into sterile areas at airports, and on board passenger aircraft pursuant to section 1540.111 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations.


113 HR 5759 PCS: Preventing Executive Overreach on Immigration Act of 2014
U.S. House of Representatives

text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

		II
		Calendar No. 626113th CONGRESS
		2d Session
		H. R. 5759
		IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
		December 8, 2014Received; read the first timeDecember 9, 2014Read the second time and placed on the calendarAN ACT
		To establish a rule of construction clarifying the limitations on executive authority to provide
			 certain forms of immigration relief.

		1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Preventing Executive Overreach on Immigration Act of 2014.
		2.FindingsThe Congress finds as follows:
			(1)Under article I, section 8, of the Constitution, the Congress has the power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization. As the Supreme Court found in Galvan v. Press, that the formulation of * * * policies [pertaining to the entry of aliens and their right to remain
			 here] is entrusted exclusively to Congress has become about as firmly
			 imbedded in the legislative and judicial tissues of our body politic as
			 any aspect of our government.
			(2)Under article II, section 3, of the Constitution, the President is required to take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.
			(3)Historically, executive branch officials have legitimately exercised their prosecutorial discretion
			 through their constitutional power over foreign affairs to permit
			 individuals or narrow groups of noncitizens to remain in the United States
			 temporarily due to extraordinary circumstances in their country of origin
			 that pose an imminent threat to the individuals’ life or physical safety.
			(4)Prosecutorial discretion generally ought to be applied on a case-by-case basis and not to whole
			 categories of persons.
			(5)President Obama himself has stated at least 22 times in the past that he can’t ignore existing
			 immigration law or create his own immigration law.
			(6)President Obama’s grant of deferred action to more than 4,000,000 unlawfully present aliens, as
			 directed in a November 20, 2014, memorandum issued by Secretary of
			 Homeland Security Jeh Charles Johnson, is without any constitutional or
			 statutory basis.
			3.Rule of construction
			(a)In generalNotwithstanding any other law, the executive branch of the Government shall not—
				(1)exempt or defer, by Executive order, regulation, or any other means, categories of aliens
			 considered under the immigration laws (as defined in section 101(a)(17) of
			 the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17))) to be
			 unlawfully present in the United States from removal under such laws;
				(2)treat such aliens as if they were lawfully present or had a lawful immigration status; or
				(3)treat such aliens other than as unauthorized aliens (as defined in section 274A(h)(3) of the
			 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324a(h)(3))).
				(b)ExceptionsSubsection (a) shall apply except—
				(1)to the extent prohibited by the Constitution;
				(2)upon the request of Federal, State, or local law enforcement agencies, for purposes of maintaining
			 aliens in the United States to be tried for crimes or to be witnesses at
			 trial; or
				(3)for humanitarian purposes where the aliens are at imminent risk of serious bodily harm or death.
				(c)Effect of executive actionAny action by the executive branch with the purpose of circumventing the objectives of this section
			 shall be null and void and without legal effect.
			(d)Effective dateThis section shall take effect as if enacted on November 20, 2014, and shall apply to requests
			 (regardless of whether the request is original or for reopening of a
			 previously denied request) submitted on or after such date for—
				(1)work authorization; or
				(2)exemption from, or deferral of, removal.

	Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 2014.Karen L. Haas,Clerk
	December 9, 2014Read the second time and placed on the calendar


116 HR 4099 IH: ADA Compliance for Customer Entry to Stores and Services Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2019-07-30
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

I116th CONGRESS1st SessionH. R. 4099IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESJuly 30, 2019Mr. Calvert (for himself, Mr. Cook, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Walker, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Turner, Mr. Rice of South Carolina, and Mr. Wilson of South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryA BILLTo amend the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 to promote compliance through education, to
			 clarify the requirements for demand letters, to provide for a notice and
			 cure period before the commencement of a private civil action, and for
			 other purposes.

 1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the ADA Compliance for Customer Entry to Stores and Services Act or the ACCESS Act. 2.Compliance through education (a)In generalBased on existing funding, the Disability Rights Section of the Department of Justice shall, in consultation with property owners and representatives of the disability rights community, develop a program to educate State and local governments and property owners on effective and efficient strategies for promoting access to public accommodations for persons with a disability (as defined in section 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12102)). Such program may include training for professionals such as Certified Access Specialists to provide a guidance of remediation for potential violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
 (b)Materials provided in other languagesThe Disability Rights Section of the Department of Justice shall take appropriate actions, to the extent practicable, to make technical assistance publications relating to compliance with this Act and the amendments made by this Act available in all the languages commonly used by owners and operators of United States businesses.
 3.Notice and cure periodParagraph (1) of section 308(a) of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12188(a)(1)) is amended to read as follows:

				(1)Availability of remedies and procedures
 (A)In generalSubject to subparagraph (B), the remedies and procedures set forth in section 204(a) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000a–3(a)) are the remedies and procedures this title provides to any person who is being subjected to discrimination on the basis of disability in violation of this title or who has reasonable grounds for believing that such person is about to be subjected to discrimination in violation of section 303. Nothing in this section shall require a person with a disability to engage in a futile gesture if such person has actual notice that a person or organization covered by this title does not intend to comply with its provisions.
 (B)Barriers to access to existing public accommodationsA civil action under section 302 or 303 based on the failure to remove an architectural barrier to access into an existing public accommodation may not be commenced by a person aggrieved by such failure unless—
 (i)that person has provided to the owner or operator of the accommodation a written notice specific enough to allow such owner or operator to identify the barrier; and
						(ii)
 (I)during the period beginning on the date the notice is received and ending 60 days after that date, the owner or operator fails to provide to that person a written description outlining improvements that will be made to remove the barrier; or
 (II)if the owner or operator provides the written description under subclause (I), the owner or operator fails to remove the barrier or, in the case of a barrier, the removal of which requires additional time as a result of circumstances beyond the control of the owner or operator, fails to make substantial progress in removing the barrier during the period beginning on the date the description is provided and ending 60 days after that date.
 (C)Specification of details of alleged violationThe written notice required under subparagraph (B) must also specify in detail the circumstances under which an individual was actually denied access to a public accommodation, including the address of property, whether a request for assistance in removing an architectural barrier to access was made, and whether the barrier to access was a permanent or temporary barrier..
 4.Effective dateThis Act and the amendments made by this Act take effect 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
 5.Mediation for ADA actions related to architectural barriersThe Judicial Conference of the United States shall, under rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or any other applicable law, in consultation with property owners and representatives of the disability rights community, develop a model program to promote the use of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, including a stay of discovery during mediation, to resolve claims of architectural barriers to access for public accommodations. To the extent practical, the Federal Judicial Center should provide a public comment period on any such proposal. The goal of the model program shall be to promote access quickly and efficiently without the need for costly litigation. The model program should include an expedited method for determining the relevant facts related to such barriers to access and steps taken before the commencement of litigation to resolve any issues related to access.
 6.Study regarding WCAG 2.0 standardsNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall complete a study to determine whether WCAG 2.0 standards, accessibility widgets, or providing a telephone number through which members of the public can obtain the same information and services as they would on a website would all provide reasonable accommodations for individuals with disabilities who are protected by the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.


117 SRES 69 IS: Authorizing expenditures by the Committee on the Judiciary.
U.S. Senate
2021-02-22
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

III117th CONGRESS1st SessionS. RES. 69IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESFebruary 22, 2021Mr. Durbin, from the Committee on the Judiciary, reported the following original resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and AdministrationRESOLUTIONAuthorizing expenditures by the Committee on the Judiciary.1.General
 authorityIn carrying out its powers, duties, and functions under the Standing Rules of the Senate, in accordance with its jurisdiction under rule XXV of the Standing Rules of the Senate, including holding hearings, reporting such hearings, and making investigations as authorized by paragraphs 1 and 8 of rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, the Committee on the Judiciary (in this resolution referred to as the committee) is authorized from March 1, 2021 through February 28, 2023, in its discretion, to—(1)make expenditures from the contingent fund of the Senate;(2)employ personnel; and(3)with the prior consent of the Government department or agency concerned and the Committee on Rules and Administration, use on a reimbursable or nonreimbursable basis the services of personnel of any such department or agency.2.Expenses(a)Expenses for
 period ending September 30, 2021The expenses of the committee for the period March 1, 2021 through September 30, 2021 under this resolution shall not exceed $6,908,656, of which amount—(1)not to exceed $100,000 may be expended for the procurement of the services of individual consultants, or organizations thereof (as authorized by section 202(i) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 4301(i))); and(2)not to exceed $10,000 may be expended for the training of the professional staff of the committee (under procedures specified by section 202(j) of that Act).(b)Expenses for fiscal year 2022 periodThe expenses of the committee for the period October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022 under this resolution shall not exceed $11,843,410, of which amount—(1)not to exceed $125,000 may be expended for the procurement of the services of individual consultants, or organizations thereof (as authorized by section 202(i) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 4301(i))); and(2)not to exceed $15,000 may be expended for the training of the professional staff of the committee (under procedures specified by section 202(j) of that Act).(c)Expenses for period ending February 28, 2023The expenses of the committee for the period October 1, 2022 through February 28, 2023 under this resolution shall not exceed $4,934,754, of which amount—(1)not to exceed $80,000 may be expended for the procurement of the services of individual consultants, or organizations thereof (as authorized by section 202(i) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 4301(i))); and(2)not to exceed $10,000 may be expended for the training of the professional staff of the committee (under procedures specified by section 202(j) of that Act).3.Expenses and
			 agency contributions(a)Expenses of the
			 committee(1)In
 generalExcept as provided in paragraph (2), expenses of the committee under this resolution shall be paid from the contingent fund of the Senate upon vouchers approved by the chairman of the committee.(2)Vouchers not
 requiredVouchers shall not be required for—(A)the disbursement of salaries of employees paid at an annual rate;(B)the payment of telecommunications provided by the Office of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper;(C)the payment of stationery supplies purchased through the Keeper of the Stationery;(D)payments to the Postmaster of the Senate;(E)the payment of metered charges on copying equipment provided by the Office of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper;(F)the payment of Senate Recording and Photographic Services; or(G)the payment of franked and mass mail costs by the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper.(b)Agency
 contributionsThere are authorized to be paid from the appropriations account for Expenses of Inquiries and Investigations of the Senate such sums as may be necessary for agency contributions related to the compensation of employees of the committee—(1)for the period March 1, 2021 through September 30, 2021;(2)for the period October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022; and(3)for the period October 1, 2022 through February 28, 2023.


110 HRES 19 IH: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives concerning health promotion and disease prevention.
U.S. House of Representatives
2007-01-04
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

IV
110th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 19
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 4, 2007
Mr. Gene Green of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives concerning health promotion and disease prevention.

Whereas the New England Journal of Medicine has reported that modifiable lifestyle factors such as smoking, sedentary lifestyle, poor nutrition, unmanaged stress, and obesity account for approximately 50 percent of the premature deaths in the United States;
Whereas the New England Journal of Medicine has reported that spending on chronic diseases related to lifestyle and other preventable diseases accounts for an estimated 70 percent of total health care spending;
Whereas the Department of Health and Human Services has concluded that the health burden of these behaviors falls in greatest proportion on older adults, young children, racial and ethnic minorities, and citizens who have less education and income;
Whereas business leaders in the United States have asserted that the economic burden of medical care diverts corporate resources from investments that could produce greater financial returns, and reduces the wages paid to employees;
Whereas the Office of Management and Budget reports that the Medicaid and Medicare programs consume an increasingly large portion of government funding;
Whereas the American Journal of Public Health reports that the financial burden of the Medicare program will increase substantially as the population ages and increasing numbers of people are covered by that program;
Whereas improving the health of the American people and reducing the need for medical services is a viable way to control medical care costs for the Nation;
Whereas the American Journal of Health Promotion reports that a growing research base demonstrates that lifestyle factors can be modified to improve health, improve the quality of life, reduce medical care costs, and enhance workplace productivity through health promotion programs;
Whereas the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has determined that less than 8 percent of health care spending is devoted to the whole area of public health, only a very small portion of which is devoted to health promotion;
Whereas significant additional work is required to develop the basic and applied science of health promotion;
Whereas additional research is required to clarify the impact of health promotion programs on long term health behaviors, health conditions, morbidity and mortality, medical care utilization and cost, as well as quality of life and productivity;
Whereas the Institute of Medicine has proclaimed that additional research is required to determine the most effective strategies at the individual, organizational, community, and societal level to create lasting health behavior changes, reduce medical utilization and enhance workplace productivity;
Whereas health promotion leaders proclaim that additional research is required to develop strategies to reach all groups with special attention focused on older adults, young children, racial and ethnic minorities and citizens who have less education and income;
Whereas health promotion leaders proclaim that significant efforts are required to develop standardized management and clinical protocols for programs and to disseminate these protocols to scientists and practitioners in health care, workplace, school, and other community settings;
Whereas health promotion leaders proclaim that information on the benefits of health promotion programs must be disseminated to policy makers in public and private sector settings;
Whereas health promotion leaders proclaim that significant efforts are required to develop programs to enhance lifestyle in school, workplace, health care, and other community settings;
Whereas investments in health promotion contributes directly to current efforts of Ending Health Disparities, the Leading Health Indicators, and Healthy People 2010; and
Whereas Research!America reports that most American citizens and scientists have shown strong support for increased investment in health promotion: Now, therefore, be it

That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the powers of the Federal Government should be utilized—
(1)to enhance the science base required to fully develop the field of health promotion and disease prevention; and
(2)to explore how strategies can integrate lifestyle improvement programs into national policy, health care workplaces, families, and communities.