        DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
        Office of the Secretary
        43 CFR Parts 47 and 48
        RIN 1090-AA98
        Land Exchange Procedures and Procedures To Amend the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920

          AGENCY:
          Office of the Secretary, Interior.

          ACTION:
          Proposed rule.

          SUMMARY:
          This rule would remove ambiguities the State of Hawai`i faces in administration of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act. It would facilitate the goal of the rehabilitation of the Native Hawaiian community, including the return of native Hawaiians to the land, consistent with the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, the State of Hawai`i Admission Act, and the Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act. The rule clarifies the land exchange process, the documents required, and the respective responsibilities of the Department of the Interior, the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, and other entities engaged in land exchanges of Hawaiian home lands. It also clarifies the documents required and the responsibilities of the Secretary of the Interior in the approval process for proposed amendments by the State of Hawai`i to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, as amended.

          DATES:
          Comments must be submitted on or before July 13, 2015.

          ADDRESSES:
          You may submit comments on the rulemaking by either of the methods listed below. Please use Regulation Identifier Number 1090-AA98 in your message.
          1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions on the Web site for submitting comments.
          2. U.S. mail, courier, or hand delivery: Office of Native Hawaiian Relations, Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20240.

          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
          Ka`i`ini Kimo Kaloi, Director, Office of Native Hawaiian Relations, telephone (202) 208-7462.

        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
        I. Background
        In 1921, Congress enacted the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act (HHCA), 42 Stat. 108, to provide a homesteading program for native Hawaiians by placing approximately 200,000 acres of land (known as Hawaiian home lands) into trust. The HHCA and the Hawaiian Home Lands Trust are administered by the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL), an agency of the State of Hawai`i. The HHCA provides the DHHL the authority to propose to the Secretary of the Interior the exchange of Hawaiian home lands for land privately or publicly owned in furtherance of the purposes of the HHCA.

        The Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, among other things, created a series of funds HHCA section 213, 42 Stat. 108 (as amended). The intent of one of these funds is the “rehabilitation of native Hawaiians,” which includes the rehabilitation of “the educational, economic, political, social, and cultural processes by which the general welfare and conditions of native Hawaiians are thereby improved and perpetuated.” Id. The Department of the Interior interprets the term “rehabilitation” to include political, cultural and social reorganization that would facilitate the stated goals of rehabilitation.1
           By providing a clear process for the Department's review and approval of land exchanges and HHCA amendments, this regulation will further the goals of the HHCA, including rehabilitation.

            1 See generally Hearings on the Rehabilitation and Colonization of Hawaiians and Other Proposed Amendments to the Organic Act of the Territory of Hawai'i before the House Committee on the Territories, H.R. Rep. No. 839, 66th Cong., 2d Sess., at 4 (1920) (Sen. John H. Wise testified, “The Hawaiian people are a farming people and fishermen, out-of-door people, and [being] frozen out of their lands . . . is one of the reasons why the Hawaiian people are dying. Now, the only way to save them, I contend, is to take them back to the lands and give them the mode of living that their ancestors were accustomed to and in that way rehabilitate them.”).

        In 1959, Congress enacted the Hawai`i Admission Act, 73 Stat. 4, to admit the State of Hawai`i into the United States. In compliance with the Hawai`i Admission Act, and as a compact between the State of Hawai`i and the United States relating to the management and disposition of the Hawaiian home lands, the State of Hawai`i adopted the HHCA, as amended, as a law of the State through Article XII of the Constitution of the State. Because Congress in the HHCA section 223 reserved the right to alter, amend, or repeal Title 2 of the HHCA, section 4 of the Hawai`i Admission Act provides that the HHCA is subject to amendment or repeal by the State of Hawai`i only with the consent of the United States. Recognizing, however, that it was granting the State administrative authority, Congress in section 4 also provided exceptions within which the State could amend certain administrative provisions of the HHCA without the consent of the United States.

        During the territorial period of Hawai`i, the HHCA was included in the compilation of the Revised Laws of Hawai`i. Following Hawai`i's statehood, the HHCA was not repealed and remains in effect with elements of both Federal and State law. The compilation of the HHCA was removed from the text of the United States Code and inserted into a note in the Code, recognizing the State's authority to amend provisions of the HHCA that do not alter the responsibilities of the United States or infringe upon its interests or the interests of the beneficiaries.

        The HHCA is a compound of interdependent Federal and State law. Congress enacted the Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act, 1995, (HHLRA), Public Law 104-42, 109 Stat. 357, which provides that the Secretary of the Interior shall determine whether a proposed amendment to the HHCA requires the consent of the United States under section 4 of the Hawai`i Admission Act. It is appropriately the function of the United States to ensure conformance with the limitations in the Admissions Act and protect the integrity of this statutory framework.
        The HHLRA also clarified the role of the Secretary in the oversight of the Hawaiian Home Lands Trust. Section 204(a)(3) of the HHCA, in conjunction with Section 205 of the HHLRA, requires the approval or disapproval of the Secretary of the Interior for the exchange of Hawaiian home lands. The HHLRA details the Secretary's responsibilities to ensure that Hawaiian home lands are administered in a manner that advances the interests of the beneficiaries.
        The HHLRA clarifies the scope of two of the continuing responsibilities of the Federal Government with regard to the HHCA. It clarifies the role of the Secretary in land exchanges and requires the State of Hawai`i to notify the Secretary of the Interior of any amendment it proposes to the HHCA and requires the Secretary to determine whether the State is proposing to amend the Federal responsibilities under the HHCA, or infringe on Federal interests or those of the beneficiaries, thus requiring Congress to approve the proposed amendment. 43 CFR part 47 of the proposed regulations sets forth the Secretary's process for approving or disapproving land exchanges of Hawaiian home lands conducted by DHHL under the HHCA and HHLRA. 43 CFR part 48 of the proposed regulations establishes the review and approval process for State of Hawai`i proposed amendments to the HHCA.
        II. Summary of Impacts
        1. Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563.)
        Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs will review all significant rules. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs determined that this rule is not significant.
        Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open exchange of ideas. This proposed rule is consistent with these requirements.
        2. Regulatory Flexibility Act

        The Department of the Interior certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
        3. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
        This is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This proposed rule:
        (a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more.
        (b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions.
        (c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
        4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

        This proposed rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per year. The proposed rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State, local or tribal governments or the private sector. A statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
        5. Takings (E.O. 12630)
        In accordance with Executive Order 12630, the rule does not have significant takings implications. A takings implication assessment is not required.
        6. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
        In accordance with Executive Order 13132, the proposed rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. It would not substantially and directly affect the relationship between the Federal and state governments. The Secretary of the Department of the Interior has oversight to ensure that land under the HHCA is administered in a manner that advances the interests of the beneficiaries. A Federalism Assessment is not required.
        7. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
        In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the Office of the Solicitor determined that this proposed rule does not unduly burden the judicial system and meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
        8. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
        Under the criteria in Executive Order 13175, the Department evaluated this proposed rule and determined that it has no potential effects on federally recognized Indian tribes. This proposed rule does not have tribal implications that impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian Tribal governments.
        9. Paperwork Reduction Act
        This proposed rule does not require an information collection from 10 or more parties and a submission under the Paperwork Reduction Act is not required. An OMB form 83-I is not required.
        10. National Environmental Policy Act
        This proposed rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement under the National Environmental Policy Act, 1969, is not required. Under Departmental Manual 516 DM 2.3A(2), Section 1.10 of 516 DM 2, Appendix 1 excludes from documentation in an environmental assessment or impact statement “policies, directives, regulations and guidelines of an administrative, financial, legal, technical or procedural nature; or the environmental effects of which are too broad, speculative or conjectural to lend themselves to meaningful analysis and will be subject later to the NEPA process, either collectively or case-by-case.”
        11. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)

        This proposed rule is not a significant energy action under the definition in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not required. This proposed rule will not have a significant effect on the nation's energy supply, distribution, or use.

        12. Clarity of This Regulation
        The Department is required by Executive Orders 12866 and 12988 and by the Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain language. This means that each rule the Department publishes must:
        (a) Be logically organized;
        (b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
        (c) Use clear language rather than jargon;
        (d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
        (e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.

        If you feel that the Department did not meet these requirements, please send comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To better help the Department revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections or paragraphs that you find unclear, which sections or sentences are too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful, etc.
        13. Public Availability of Comments
        Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask the Department in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, the Department cannot guarantee that it will be able to do so.

          List of Subjects in 43 CFR Parts 47 and 48
          Hawaii, Intergovernmental programs, Land, State-Federal relations.

          Dated: May 6, 2015.
          Kristen J. Sarri,
          Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management and Budget.

        For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of the Interior proposes to amend title 43 of the Code of Federal Regulations by adding new parts 47 and 48 as set forth below:

          PART 47—LAND EXCHANGE PROCEDURES

            Sec.
            47.5
            What is the purpose of this part?
            47.10
            What definitions apply to terms used in this part?
            47.15
            What laws apply to exchanges made under this part?

              Subpart A—The Exchange Process
              47.20
              What factors will the Secretary consider in analyzing a land exchange?
              47.30
              When does a land exchange advance the interests of the beneficiaries?
              47.35
              Must lands exchanged be of equal value?
              47.40
              How must properties be described?
              47.45
              How does the exchange process work?
              47.50
              What should DHHL include in a land exchange proposal for the Secretary?
              47.55
              What are the minimum requirements for appraisals used in a land exchange?
              47.60
              What documentation must DHHL submit to the Secretary in the land exchange packet?

              Subpart B—Approval and Finalization
              47.65
              When will the Secretary approve or disapprove the land exchange?
              47.70
              How does DHHL complete the exchange once approved?

            Authority:
             State of Hawai`i Admission Act, 73 Stat. 4, chapter 339, approved March 18, 1959; Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, as amended, Act of July 9, 1921, chapter 42, 42 Stat. 108; Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act, 1995, 109 Stat. 537, Public Law 104-42; 5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 2 and 9; 43 U.S.C. 1457; 112 Departmental Manual 28.

            § 47.5
            What is the purpose of this part?
            This part sets forth the procedures for conducting land exchanges of Hawaiian home lands authorized by the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act (HHCA), 1920, as amended.

            § 47.10
            What definitions apply to terms used in this part?
            As used in this part, the following terms have the meanings given in this section.

              Appraisal or Appraisal report means a written statement independently and impartially prepared by a qualified appraiser setting forth an opinion as to the market value of the lands or interests in lands to be exchanged as of a specific date(s), supported by the presentation and analysis of relevant market information.

              Beneficiaries means “native Hawaiian(s)” as that term is defined under section 201(a) of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act.

              Chairman means the Chairman of the Hawaiian Homes Commission designated under section 202 of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act.

              Commission means the Hawaiian Homes Commission established by section 202 of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, which also serves as the executive board of the Department of Hawaiian Homes Lands.

              Consultation means an open discussion process that allows interested parties to address potential issues, changes, or actions. Consultation does not require formal face to face meetings. However, it does require dialogue (verbal, electronic, or printed) or at least a good faith effort to engage in dialogue between the DHHL and the beneficiaries, consideration of their views, and, where feasible, seek agreement with the beneficiaries when engaged in the land exchange process.

              DHHL or Department of Hawaiian Home Lands means the department established by the State of Hawai`i under sections 26-4 and 26-17 of the Hawai`i Revised Statutes to administer the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act. This department assumes the authorities and responsibilities of the Hawaiian Homes Commission and the Commission serves as the department's executive board under amended section 202 of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act.

              Hawaiian home lands means all trust lands given the status of Hawaiian home lands under section 204 of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, and those lands obtained through approval under this part, and as directed by Congress.

              Hazardous substances means those substances designated under Environmental Protection Agency regulations at 40 CFR part 302.

              HHCA or Hawaiian Homes Commission Act means the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, Act of July 9, 1921, chapter 42, 42 Stat. 108, as amended.

              HHLRA or Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act means the Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act, 1995, Public Law 104-42, 109 Stat. 357.

              Land exchange is any transaction, other than a sale, that transfers Hawaiian home lands from DHHL to another entity and in which DHHL receives the other entity's land as Hawaiian home lands. A land exchange can involve trading Hawaiian home lands for private land, but it can also involve trading land between DHHL and State or Federal agencies.

              Market value means the most probable price in cash, or terms equivalent to cash, that lands or interests in lands should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, where the buyer and seller each acts prudently and knowledgeably, and the price is not affected by undue influence.

              Native Hawaiian or native Hawaiian has the same meaning as that term defined under section 201(a) of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act.

              Office of Valuation Services (OVS) means the Office with real estate appraisal functions within the Office of the Assistant Secretary—Policy, Management, and Budget of the Department of the Interior.

              Outstanding interests means rights or interests in property involved in a land exchange held by an entity other than a party to the exchange.

              Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior or the individual to whom the authority and responsibilities of the Secretary have been delegated.

            § 47.15
            What laws apply to exchanges made under this part?
            (a) DHHL may only exchange land under the authority of the HHCA in conformity with the HHLRA.
            (b) When DHHL makes any land exchange, the following laws and regulations constitute a partial list of applicable laws and regulations:

                Legislation or regulation
                Citation

                (1) The National Historic Preservation Act, 1966
                16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.

                (2) Implementing regulations for the National Historic Preservation Act
                36 CFR part 800

                (3) Section 3 of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA)
                25 U.S.C. 3002

                (4) Implementing regulations for the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act
                43 CFR part 10

                (5) The National Environmental Policy Act, 1969 (NEPA)
                42 U.S.C. 4371 et seq.

                (6) Implementing regulations for NEPA
                40 CFR parts 1500-1508; 43 CFR part 46

                (7) The State of Hawai`i Admission Act
                73 Stat. 4, Public Law 86-3

                (8) Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, as amended
                42 Stat. 108

                (9) Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act, 1995
                109 Stat. 537, Public Law 104-42

                (10) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)
                42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.

                (11) Implementing regulations for CERCLA
                40 CFR part 312

            (c) No new legal rights or obligations are created through listing applicable laws and regulatory provisions in this section.

            Subpart A—The Exchange Process

              § 47.20
              What factors will the Secretary consider in analyzing a land exchange?
              The Secretary may approve an exchange only after making a determination that the exchange will advance the interests of the beneficiaries. In considering whether a land exchange will advance the interests of the beneficiaries, the Secretary will evaluate the extent to which it will:
              (a) Achieve better management of Hawaiian home lands;
              (b) Meet the needs of HHCA beneficiaries and their economic circumstances by promoting:
              (1) Homesteading opportunities,
              (2) Economic self-sufficiency, and,
              (3) Social well-being;
              (c) Promote development of Hawaiian home lands for residential, agricultural, and pastoral use;
              (d) Protect cultural resources and watersheds;
              (e) Consolidate lands or interests in lands, such as agricultural and timber interests, for more logical and efficient management and development;
              (f) Expand homestead communities;
              (g) Accommodate land use authorizations;
              (h) Address HHCA beneficiary needs; and
              (i) Advance other identifiable interests of the beneficiaries consistent with the HHCA.

              § 47.30
              When does a land exchange advance the interests of the beneficiaries?
              A determination that an exchange advances the interests of the beneficiaries must find that:
              (a) The exchange supports perpetuation and administration of Hawaiian home lands;
              (b) The interests of the beneficiaries in obtaining non-Hawaiian home lands exceeds the interests of the beneficiaries in retaining the Hawaiian home lands proposed for the exchange, based on an evaluation of the factors in § 47.20; and
              (c) The intended use of the conveyed Hawaiian home lands will not significantly conflict with the beneficiaries' interests in adjacent Hawaiian home lands.

              § 47.35
              Must lands exchanged be of equal value?
              Hawaiian home lands to be exchanged must be of equal or lesser value than the lands to be received in the exchange, as determined by the appraisal. Once the market value is established by an approved appraisal, an administrative determination as to the equity of the exchange can be made based on the market value reflected in the approved appraisal.

              § 47.40
              How must properties be described?
              The description of properties involved in a land exchange must be either:
              (a) Based upon a survey completed in accordance with the Public Land Survey System laws and standards of the United States; or
              (b) If Public Land Survey System laws and standards cannot be applied, based upon a survey that both:
              (1) Uses other means prescribed or allowed by applicable law; and
              (2) Clearly describes the property and allows it to be easily located.

              § 47.45
              How does the exchange process work?
              (a) The Secretary recommends the parties prepare a land exchange proposal in accordance with § 47.50. The Secretary also recommends the DHHL and the non-DHHL party in the exchange meet with the Department before finalizing a land exchange proposal and signing an agreement to initiate the land exchange to informally discuss:
              (1) The review and processing procedures for Hawaiian home lands exchanges;
              (2) Potential issues involved that may require more consideration; or
              (3) Any other matter that may make the proposal more complete before submission to us.
              (b) Whether or not a land exchange proposal is completed, the DHHL initiates the exchange by preparing the documentation, conducting appropriate studies, and submitting them to the Secretary in accordance with § 47.60.
              (c) Upon completing the review of the final land exchange packet under § 47.60, the Secretary will issue a Notice of Decision announcing the approval or disapproval of the exchange.
              (d) If the Secretary approves an exchange, title will transfer in accordance with State law.

              § 47.50
              What should DHHL include in a land exchange proposal for the Secretary?

              (a) A land exchange proposal should include the following documentation:

                  The proposal should include . . .
                  that should contain . . .

                  (1) Identifying information
                  (i) The identity of the parties involved in the proposed exchange; and

                  (ii) The status of their ownership of the properties in the exchange, or their ability to provide title to the properties.

                  (2) Descriptive information
                  A legal description of:

                  (i) The land considered for the exchange; and

                  (ii) The appurtenant rights proposed to be exchanged or reserved.

                  (3) Authorized use information
                  (i) Any authorized uses including grants, permits, easements, or leases; and

                  (ii) Any known unauthorized uses, outstanding interests, exceptions, adverse claims, covenants, restrictions, title defects or encumbrances.

                  (4) A time schedule for completing the exchange
                  Expected dates of significant transactions or milestones.

                  (5) Assignment of responsibilities
                  Responsibilities for:

                  (i) Performance of required actions; and

                  (ii) Costs associated with the proposed exchange.

                  (6) Hazardous substance information
                  Notice of:

                  (i) Any known release, storage, or disposal of hazardous substances on non-DHHL properties in the exchange;

                  (ii) Any commitments regarding responsibility for removal or remedial actions concerning hazardous substances on non-DHHL properties; and

                  (iii) All terms and conditions regarding hazardous substances on non-DHHL properties.

                  (7) Grants of permission by each party to the other
                  Permission to enter the properties for the purpose of conducting physical examination and studies in preparation for the exchange. Written permission to appraise the properties should also be included.

                  (8) Three statements
                  Details of:

                  (i) Arrangements for relocating tenants occupying the DHHL and non-DHHL properties involved in the exchange;

                  (ii) How the land exchange proposal complies with the HHCA and HHLRA; and

                  (iii) How the documents of conveyance will be exchanged once the Secretary has approved the exchange.

              (b) When the parties to the exchange agree to proceed with the land exchange proposal, they may sign an agreement that DHHL will initiate the exchange.

              § 47.55
              What are the minimum requirements for appraisals used in a land exchange?
              (a) The following table shows the steps in the appraisal process.

                  Appraisal process step
                  Requirements

                  (1) The parties to the exchange must arrange for appraisals
                  (i) The parties must arrange for appraisals within 90 days after executing the agreement to initiate the land exchange, unless the parties agree to another schedule.

                  (ii) The parties must give the appraiser the land exchange proposal, if any, and the agreement to initiate the land exchange, and any attachments and amendments.

                  (iii) The DHHL is encouraged to request assistance from the Department's Office of Valuation Services (OVS). OVS can provide valuation services to DHHL, including appraisal, appraisal review, and appraisal consultation on a reimbursable basis. OVS is also available for post-facto program review to ensure that appraisals conducted by the State are in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice and the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions as appropriate.

                  (2) The qualified appraiser must provide an appraisal report
                  The appraiser must: (i) Meet the qualification requirements in paragraph (b) of this section;

                  (ii) Produce a report that meets the qualifications in paragraph (c) of this section; and

                  (iii) Complete the appraisal under the timeframe and terms negotiated with the parties in the exchange.

                  (3) The Secretary will review appraisal reports
                  The Secretary will evaluate the reports using: (i) The Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice; and

                  (ii) The Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions.

              (b) To be qualified under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, an appraiser must:
              (1) Be competent, reputable, impartial, and experienced in appraising property similar to the properties involved in the appraisal assignment; and
              (2) Be approved by the OVS, if required by the Department's Office of Native Hawaiian Relations.
              (3) Be licensed to perform appraisals in the State of Hawai'i unless a Federal employee whose position requires the performance of appraisal duties. Federal employees only need to be licensed in one State or territory to perform real estate appraisal duties as Federal employees in all States and territories.
              (c) Appraisal reports for the exchange must:
              (1) Be completed in accordance with the current edition of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) and the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisition (UASFLA); and
              (2) Include the estimated market value of Hawaiian home lands and non-Hawaiian home lands properties involved in the exchange.

              § 47.60
              What documentation must DHHL submit to the Secretary in the land exchange packet?
              The documents in the exchange packet submitted to us for approval must include the following:

                  The packet must contain . . .
                  that must include . . .

                  (a) Required statements
                  (1) A statement of approval for the exchange from the Commission;

                  (2) A statement of compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act and, as appropriate, a cultural and historic property review;

                  (3) An explanation of how the exchange will advance the interests of the beneficiaries;

                  (4) A summary of any consultation with any beneficiaries that may have occurred; and

                  (5) A statement of compliance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act.

                  (b) Required analyses and reports
                  (1) Environmental analyses and records sufficient to meet CERCLA, NEPA, and all other pertinent Federal environmental requirements;

                  (2) Land appraisal reports and statements of qualification of the appraisers in accordance with § 47.55; and

                  (3) If property conveyed is adjacent to Hawaiian home lands:

                  (i) An analysis of intended use of the Hawaiian home lands conveyed;

                  (ii) A finding that the intended use will not conflict with established management objectives on the adjacent Hawaiian home lands; and

                  (4) A copy of the land exchange proposal, if any.

                  (c) Relevant legal documents
                  (1) Any land exchange agreements entered into regarding the subject properties between DHHL and the non-DHHL party;

                  (2) Evidence of title; and

                  (3) Deeds signed by the parties, with a signature block for the Secretary of the Interior or our authorized representative to approve the transaction.

            Subpart B—Approval and Finalization

              § 47.65
              When will the Secretary approve or disapprove the land exchange?
              On receipt of the complete land exchange packet from the Commission, the Secretary will approve or disapprove the exchange within 120 calendar days.
              (a) Before approving or disapproving the exchange, the Secretary will review all environmental analyses, appraisals, and all other supporting studies and requirements to determine whether the proposed exchange complies with applicable law and advances the interests of the beneficiaries.
              (b) The Secretary may consult with the beneficiaries when making a determination if a land exchange advances the interests of the beneficiaries.
              (c) After approving or disapproving an exchange, the Secretary will notify DHHL, the Commission, and other officials as required by section 205(b)(2) of the HHLRA.

              § 47.70
              How does DHHL complete the exchange once approved?
              (a) The DHHL completes the exchange in accordance with the requirements of State law.
              (b) DHHL shall provide a title report to us as evidence of the completed exchange.

          PART 48—AMENDMENTS TO THE HAWAIIAN HOMES COMMISSION ACT

            Sec.
            48.5
            What is the purpose of this part?
            48.6
            What definitions apply to terms used in this part?
            48.10
            What is the Secretary's role in reviewing proposed amendments to the HHCA?
            48.15
            What are the State's responsibilities in proposing amendments?
            48.20
            How does the Secretary determine if the State is seeking to amend Federal law?
            48.25
            How does the Secretary determine if the proposed amendment decreases the benefits to beneficiaries of Hawaiian home lands?
            48.30
            How does the Secretary determine if Congressional approval is unnecessary?
            48.35
            When must the Secretary determine if the proposed amendment requires Congressional approval?
            48.40
            What notification will the Secretary provide?
            48.45
            When is a proposed amendment deemed effective?
            48.50
            Can the State of Hawai`i amend the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act without Secretarial review?

            Authority:

             State of Hawai`i Admission Act, 73 Stat. 4, chapter 339, approved March 18, 1959; Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, 42 Stat. 108 et seq., chapter 42; Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act, 1995, 109 Stat. 537; 5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 2 and 9; 43 U.S.C. 1457; 112 Departmental Manual 28.

            § 48.5
            What is the purpose of this part?
            (a) This part sets forth the policies and procedures for:
            (1) Review by the Secretary of proposed amendments to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act by the State of Hawai`i; and
            (2) Determination by the Secretary whether the proposed amendment requires congressional approval.
            (b) This part implements requirements of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, the State of Hawai`i Admission Act, 1959, and the Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act, 1995.

            § 48.6
            What definitions apply to terms used in this part?
            As used in this part, the following terms have the meanings given in this section.

              Beneficiaries means “native Hawaiian(s)” as that term is defined under section 201(a) of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act.

              Chairman means the Chairman of the Hawaiian Homes Commission designated under section 202 of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act.

              Consultation means an open discussion process that allows interested parties to address potential issues, changes, or actions. Consultation does not require formal face-to-face meetings. However, it does require dialogue (verbal, electronic, or printed) or at least a good faith effort to engage in dialogue with the beneficiaries.

              DHHL or Department of Hawaiian Home Lands means the department established by the State of Hawai`i under sections 26-4 and 26-17 of the Hawai`i Revised Statutes to administer the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act. This department assumes the authorities and responsibilities of the Hawaiian Homes Commission and the Commission serves as the department's executive board under amended section 202 of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act.

              HHCA or Hawaiian Homes Commission Act means the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, 42 Stat. 108 et seq., chapter 42, as amended.

              HHLRA or Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act means the Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act, 1995, 109 Stat. 537, Public Law 104-42.

              Hawaiian home lands means all trust lands given the status of Hawaiian home lands under section 204 of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act and those lands obtained through approval under part 47, Land Exchange Procedures, by the DHHL, and as directed by Congress.

              Lessee means either a:

            (1) Beneficiary who has been awarded a lease under section 207(a) of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act;
            (2) Transferee lessee under section 208(5) of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act; or
            (3) Successor lessee under section 209 of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act.

              Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior or a designated employee.

              Special Trust Funds means the Hawaiian home-loan fund, the Hawaiian home-operating fund, and the Hawaiian home-development fund as defined under section 213 of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act.

            § 48.10
            What is the Secretary's role in reviewing proposed amendments to the HHCA?
            (a) The Secretary must review proposed amendments to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act (HHCA) by the State of Hawai`i to determine whether the proposed amendment requires approval of Congress.
            (b) The Secretary will notify the Chairman and Congress of this determination, and if approval is required, submit to Congress the documents required by § 48.35(b).

            § 48.15
            What are the State's responsibilities in proposing amendments?
            (a) Not later than 120 days after the State approves a proposed amendment to the HHCA, the Chairman must submit to the Secretary a clear and complete:
            (1) Copy of the proposed amendment;
            (2) Description of the nature of the change proposed by the proposed amendment; and,
            (3) Opinion regarding whether the proposed amendment requires the approval of Congress.
            (b) The following information must also be submitted:
            (1) A description of the proposed amendment, including why the proposed amendment advances the interests of the beneficiaries;
            (2) All testimony and correspondence from the Director of the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, Hawaiian Homes Commissioners, and Homestead Associations, providing views on the proposed amendment;
            (3) An analysis of the law and policy of the proposed amendment by the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands and the Hawaiian Homes Commission;
            (4) Documentation of the dates and number of hearings held on the measure, and a copy of all testimony provided or submitted at each hearing;
            (5) Copies of all committee reports and other legislative history, including prior versions of the proposed amendment;
            (6) Final vote totals by the Commission and the legislature on the proposed amendment forwarded to the Secretary of the Interior;
            (7) Summaries of all outreach or consultations conducted with the beneficiaries regarding the proposed amendment; and
            (8) Other additional information that the State believes may assist in the review of the proposed amendment.

            § 48.20
            How does the Secretary determine if the State is seeking to amend Federal law?
            The Secretary will determine that Congressional approval is required if the proposed amendment does any of the following:
            (a) Decreases benefits to the beneficiaries of Hawaiian home lands;
            (b) Reduces or impairs the Special Trust Funds;
            (c) Allows for additional encumbrances to be placed on Hawaiian home lands by officers other than those charged with the administration of the HHCA;
            (d) Changes the qualifications of who may be a lessee;
            (e) Allows the use of proceeds and income from the Hawaiian home lands for purposes other than carrying out the provisions of the HHCA; or
            (f) Amends a section other than sections 202, 213, 219, 220, 222, 224, or 225, or other provisions relating to administration, or paragraph (2) of section 204, section 206, or 212 or other provisions relating to the powers and duties of officers other than those charged with the administration of the HHCA.

            § 48.25
            How does the Secretary determine if the proposed amendment decreases the benefits to beneficiaries of Hawaiian home lands?
            The Secretary will determine if the proposed amendment decreases the benefits to the beneficiaries, now or in the future, by weighing the answers to the following questions:
            (a) How would the proposed amendment advance or otherwise impact current lessees of Hawaiian home lands?
            (b) How would the proposed amendment advance or otherwise impact HHCA beneficiaries currently on a waiting list for a Hawaiian home lands lease?
            (c) How would the proposed amendment advance or otherwise impact HHCA beneficiaries who have not yet applied for a Hawaiian home lands lease?
            (d) If the interests of the beneficiaries who have not been awarded a Hawaiian home lands lease and the lessees differ, how does the proposed amendment weigh the interests of HHCA beneficiaries who have not been awarded a Hawaiian home lands lease with the interests of Hawaiian home lands lessees?
            (e) If the interests of the beneficiaries who have not been awarded a Hawaiian home lands lease and the lessees differ, do the benefits to the lessees outweigh any detriment to the beneficiaries who have not been awarded a Hawaiian home lands lease?
            (f) If the interests of the beneficiaries differ from the interests of the lessees, do the benefits to the beneficiaries outweigh any detriment to the lessees?

            § 48.30
            How does the Secretary determine if Congressional approval is unnecessary?
            The Secretary will determine that Congressional approval is unnecessary if the proposed amendment meets none of the circumstances in § 48.20.

            § 48.35
            When must the Secretary determine if the proposed amendment requires Congressional approval?
            The Secretary will review the documents submitted by the Chairman, and if they meet the requirements of § 48.15, the Secretary will determine within 60 days after receiving them if the proposed amendment requires Congressional approval.

            § 48.40
            What notification will the Secretary provide?
            (a) If the Secretary determines that Congressional approval of the proposed amendment is unnecessary, the Secretary will:
            (1) Notify the Chairmen of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and of the House Committee on Natural Resources; and
            (2) Include, if appropriate, an opinion on whether the proposed amendment advances the interests of the beneficiaries.
            (b) If the Secretary determines that Congressional approval of the proposed amendment is required, the Secretary will notify the Chairmen of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and of the House Committee on Natural Resources. The Secretary will also submit to the Committees the following:
            (1) A draft joint resolution approving the proposed amendment;
            (2) A description of the change made by the proposed amendment and an explanation of how the proposed amendment advances the interests of the beneficiaries;
            (3) A comparison of the existing law with the proposed amendment;
            (4) A recommendation on the advisability of approving the proposed amendment;
            (5) All documentation concerning the proposed amendment received from the Chairman; and
            (6) All documentation concerning the proposed amendment received from the beneficiaries.

            § 48.45
            When is a proposed amendment deemed effective?
            (a) If the Secretary determines that a proposed amendment meets none of the criteria in § 48.20, the effective date of the proposed amendment is the date of the notification letter to the Committee Chairmen.
            (b) If the Secretary determines that the proposed amendment requires congressional approval then the effective date of the proposed amendment is the date that Congress' approval becomes law.

            § 48.50
            Can the State of Hawai`i amend the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act without Secretarial review?
            The Secretary of the Interior must review all proposed amendments to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act. Any proposed amendments to any terms or provisions of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act by the State must also specifically state that the proposed amendment proposes to amend the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act. Any state enactment that impacts any of the factors in § 48.20 shall have no effect on the provisions of the HHCA or administration of the trust, except pursuant to this part.

      [FR Doc. 2015-11401 Filed 5-8-15; 4:15 pm]
       BILLING CODE 4310-93-P


        FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
        47 CFR Part 64
        [CC Docket No. 91-281; DA 06-2283]
        Rules and Regulations Regarding the Transmission of Calling Party Number

          AGENCY:
          Federal Communications Commission.

          ACTION:
          Proposed waiver; comments requested.

          SUMMARY:
          On October 25, 2006, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), John F. Kennedy Space Center (KSC) filed a petition for a limited waiver of the Commission's rules, which prohibits terminating carriers from passing calling party number (CPN) to the called party where a privacy indicator has been triggered. KSC requests that the Commission allow it to receive CPN, even when a privacy indicator has been triggered. In this document, the Commission seeks comment on the NASA/KSC petition for limited waiver of the Commission's Calling Party Number rules.

          DATES:
          Comments are due on or before December 14, 2006, and reply comments are due on or before December 26, 2006.

          ADDRESSES:
          You may submit comments, identified by CC Docket No. 91-281, by any of the following methods:
          • Federal eRulemaking Portal:
            http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

          • Federal Communications Commission's Web Site:
            http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
          • Mail: Parties who choose to file by paper should also submit their comment on diskette. These diskettes should be submitted, along with three paper copies to Lynne Montgomery, Consumer Policy Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 5-A746, Washington, DC 20554. Such a submission should be on a 3.5-inch diskette formatted in an IBM compatible format using Word 97 or compatible software. The diskette should be accompanied by a cover letter and should be submitted in “read only” mode. The diskette should be clearly labeled with the commenter's name, proceeding (including the lead docket number in this case CC Docket No. 91-281), type of pleading (comment or reply comment), date of submission, and the name of the electronic file on the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase: “Disk Copy—Not an Original.” Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's contractor at Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554.
          • People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language interpreters, CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov or phone: 202-418-0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432.

          For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.

          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

          Lynne Montgomery, Consumer Policy Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, (202) 418-2229 (voice), Lynne.Montgomery@fcc.gov (e-mail).

        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

        This is a summary of the Commission's document, DA 06-2283, released November 7, 2006. The full text of document DA 06-2283, KSC's submission, and copies of any subsequently filed documents in this matter will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. Document DA 06-2283, KSC's submission, and copies of subsequently filed documents in this matter may also be purchased from the Commission's contractor, Best Copy and Printing, at Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Customers may contact the Commission's contractor at their Web site www.bcpiweb.com or call 1-800-378-3160. A copy of KSC's submission may also be found by searching ECFS at http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs (insert CC Docket No. 91-281 into the proceeding block).

        To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). Document DA 06-2283 can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format (PDF) at http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/policy. Pursuant to §§ 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
        • Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/ or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Filers should follow the instructions provided on the Web site for submitting comments.

        • For ECFS filers, if multiple docket or rulemaking numbers appear in the caption of this proceeding, filers must transmit one electronic copy of the comments for each docket or rulemaking number referenced in the caption. In completing the transmittal screen, filers should include their full name, U.S. Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket or rulemaking number. Parties may also submit an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. To get filing instructions, filers should send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and include the following words in the body of the message, “get form.” A sample form and directions will be sent in response.
        • Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number. Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail (although the Commission continues to experience delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.

        • The Commission's contractor will receive hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary at 236 Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110, Washington, DC 20002. The filing hours at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building.
        • Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
        • U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
        Synopsis
        On October 25, 2006, KSC filed a petition for a limited waiver of § 64.1601(b) of the Commission's rules, which prohibits terminating carriers from passing calling party number (CPN) to the called party when a privacy indicator has been triggered. Specifically, KSC asks the Commission to allow its Central Office Switch facility to obtain and store CPN information so that its security personnel can identify and capture the perpetrators of threatening calls. Section 64.1601(b) of the Commission's rules states in pertinent part that “[n]o common carrier subscribing to or offering any service that delivers CPN may override the privacy indicator associated with an interstate call * * *. [W]hen a caller requests that the CPN not be passed, a carrier may not reveal that caller's number or name, nor may the carrier use the number or name to allow the called party to contact the calling party.”

        According to KSC, the facility provides its own security, fire and rescue, telecommunications, and other utility services 24 hours per day. Over the course of a year, KSC reports receiving between 12 and 20 threatening or harassing phone calls that are considered serious in nature. KSC states that the telecommunications carriers serving KSC are bound by CPN privacy rules, and parties placing threatening calls often use CPN restriction to prevent authorities from identifying their location. Without access to CPN, KSC's security personnel have to request a trace of these phone calls which can take up to a week to process. KSC requests a waiver of section 64.1601(b) so that all CPN information can be passed, to KSC's secure log, without regard to the calling party's privacy indicator, to facilitate KSC's investigation of telephone threats it deems credible. KSC proposes to limit the scope of its waiver by recording the CPN of incoming restricted calls but not passing CPN on to the party called, using passwords and non-disclosure agreements to protect CPN data, and destroying CPN information after a reasonable retention period. KSC argues that its situation presents special circumstances that warrant a limited waiver and states that it provides both the security services and end office telecommunications to all locations within its boundaries. Finally, KSC contends that the waiver would be applicable only to a narrow and well-defined public institution making it predictable, workable and unbiased in application. Accordingly, the Commission seeks comment on KSC's petition.

          Federal Communications Commission.
          Jay Keithley,
          Deputy Bureau Chief, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau.

      [FR Doc. E6-20162 Filed 11-28-06; 8:45 am]
      BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


        DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
        National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
        50 CFR Part 679
        [I.D. 071701C]
        RIN 0648-AK70
        Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone off Alaska; Individual Fishing Quota Program

          AGENCY:
          National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

          ACTION:
          Notice of availability; request for comments.

          SUMMARY:

          The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) has submitted Amendment 54 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska and Amendment 54 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area (FMPs).  These amendments would make three changes to the Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program for fixed gear Pacific halibut and sablefish fisheries off Alaska.   This action is necessary to improve the effectiveness of the IFQ Program and is intended to promote the objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) with respect to the IFQ fisheries.   NMFS is requesting comments from the public on the proposed amendments, copies of which may be obtained from the Council (See ADDRESSES).

          DATES:
          Comments on Amendments 54/54 must be submitted by September 24, 2001.

          ADDRESSES:
          Comments on the proposed amendments should be submitted to Sue Salveson, Assistant Regional Administrator for Sustainable Fisheries, Alaska Region, NMFS, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK  99802, Attn:  Lori Gravel, or delivered to the Federal Building, 709 West 9th Street, Juneau, AK.  Copies of Amendments 54/54 and the Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis prepared for the proposed amendments are available from the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 West 4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK  99501-2252; telephone 907-271-2809.

          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
          James Hale, 907-586-7228.

        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
        Background

        The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires that each Regional Fishery Management Council submit any FMP or plan amendment it prepares to NMFS for review and approval, disapproval, or partial approval.  The Magnuson-Stevens Act also requires that NMFS, after receiving a fishery management plan or amendment, immediately publish a notice in the Federal Register that the fishery management plan or amendment is available for public review and comment.  This action constitutes such notice for Amendments 54/54 to the FMPs.  NMFS will consider the public comments received during the comment period in determining whether to approve these amendments.
        The IFQ Program, a limited access management system for the fixed gear Pacific halibut and sablefish fisheries off Alaska, was approved by NMFS in January 1993, and fully implemented beginning in March 1995.  The sablefish IFQ Program is implemented by the FMPs and Federal regulations under 50 CFR part 679, Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska, under authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
        Amendments 54/54, if approved, would make three changes in the IFQ Program: (1) Allow a QS holder’s indirect ownership of a vessel, through corporate or other collective ties, to substitute for the QS holder’s vessel ownership in his or her own name for purposes of hiring a skipper to fish the QS holder’s IFQ; (2) add language specific to estates to the definition of “a change in the corporation or partnership” to prevent estates from holding QS indefinitely; and (3) standarize use limits for the two IFQ species, Pacific halibut and sablefish, by revising sablefish use limits from percentages of the total number of QS units in the QS pool to specific numbers of QS units.

        Public comments are being solicited on these proposed amendments through the end of the comment period specified in this notice.  A proposed rule that would implement the amendments may be published in the Federal Register for public comment following NMFS' evaluation under the Magnuson-Stevens Act procedures.  Public comments on the proposed rule must be received by close of business on the last day of the comment period to be considered in the decision to approve or disapprove the amendments.  All comments received by the end of the comment period, whether specifically directed to the amendments or to the proposed rule, will be considered in the decision.

          Dated: July 17, 2001.
          Bruce C. Morehead,
          Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

      [FR Doc. 01-18416  Filed 7-23-01; 8:45 am]
      BILLING CODE  3510-22-S


        GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
        48 CFR Part 505
        [GSAR Case 2008-G503; Docket 2008-0007; Sequence 18]
        RIN 3090-AI71
        General Services Acquisition Regulation; GSAR Case 2008-G503; Rewrite of GSAR Part 505, Publicizing Contract Actions

          AGENCY:
          Office of the Chief Acquisition Officer, General Services Administration (GSA).

          ACTION:
          Proposed rule.

          SUMMARY:
          The General Services Administration (GSA) is proposing to amend the General Services Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) to revise language that provides requirements for publicizing contract actions.

          DATES:
          Interested parties should submit written comments to the Regulatory Secretariat on or before November 17, 2008 to be considered in the formulation of a final rule.

          ADDRESSES:
          Submit comments identified by GSAR Case 2008-G503 by any of the following methods:
          • Regulations.gov: http://www.regulations.gov. Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by inputting “GSAR Case 2008-G503” under the heading “Comment or Submission”. Select the link “Send a Comment or Submission” that corresponds with GSAR Case 2008-G503. Follow the instructions provided to complete the “Public Comment and Submission Form”. Please include your name, company name (if any), and “GSAR Case 2008-G503” on your attached document.
          • Fax: 202-501-4067.
          • Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat (VPR), 1800 F Street, NW, Room 4041, ATTN: Laurieann Duarte, Washington, DC 20405.

            Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite GSAR Case 2008-G503 in all correspondence related to this case. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal and/or business confidential information provided.

          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
          For clarification of content, contact Ms. Cecelia Davis at (202) 219-0202. For information pertaining to the status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory Secretariat (VPR), Room 4041, GS Building, Washington, DC 20405, (202) 501-4755. Please cite GSAR Case 2008-G503.

        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
        A. Background
        The General Services Administration (GSA) is amending the General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) to update the text addressing GSAR 505 Publicizing Contract Actions, Subpart 505.1 Dissemination of Information, Subpart 505.2 Synopses of Proposed Contract Actions, and 505.5 Paid Advertisements. This rule is a result of the General Services Administration Acquisition Manual (GSAM) Rewrite initiative undertaken by GSA to revise the GSAM to maintain consistency with the FAR and implement streamlined and innovative acquisition procedures that contractors, offerors, and GSA contracting personnel can utilize when entering into and administering contractual relationships. The GSAM incorporates the General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) as well as internal agency acquisition policy.

        GSA will rewrite each part of the GSAR and GSAM, and as each GSAR part is rewritten, will publish it in the Federal Register.
        This rule covers the GSAR portion of Part 505. Currently, Subparts 505.1, 505.2 and 505.5 are identified as “shaded” for regulatory coverage; however, the agency has deemed, during the rewrite process, these Subparts as non-regulatory because the coverage addresses internal agency acquisition policy. These Subparts have been revised and will be moved to the non-regulatory portion of the GSAM.

        There were no public comments received in response to the Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published in the Federal Register at 71 FR 7910, February 15, 2006.
        This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
        B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

        The General Services Administration does not expect this proposed rule to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the revisions are not considered substantive. The revisions only update and reorganize existing coverage. An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has, therefore, not been performed. We invite comments from small businesses and other interested parties. GSA will consider comments from small entities concerning the affected GSAR Part 505 in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. (GSAR case 2008-G503), in correspondence.
        C. Paperwork Reduction Act

        The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the proposed changes to the GSAM do not impose information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.

          List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 505
          Government procurement.

          Dated: August 27, 2008.
          Al Matera,
          Director, Office of Acquisition Policy.

        Therefore, under the authority of 40 U.S.C. 121(c), GSA proposes to remove 48 CFR part 505.

          PART 505—[REMOVED]

      [FR Doc. E8-21121 Filed 9-15-08; 8:45 am]
      BILLING CODE 6820-61-S