        DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
        National Park Service
        36 CFR Part 7
        [NPS-SACN-31398; PPMWMWROW2/PMP00UP05.YP0000]
        RIN 1024-AE64
        St. Croix National Scenic Riverway, Bicycling

          AGENCY:
          National Park Service, Interior.

          ACTION:
          Proposed rule.

          SUMMARY:
          The National Park Service proposes to amend the special regulations for St. Croix National Scenic Riverway to allow bicycle use on a 0.25-mile connector trail across National Park Service land near Cable, Wisconsin. The new trail would provide direct access to the Riverway and new recreational opportunities within the Riverway and on the Chequamegon Area Mountain Bike Association trail network in Bayfield County, Wisconsin. National Park Service regulations require promulgation of a special regulation to designate new trails for bicycle use off park roads and outside of developed areas.

          DATES:
          Comments on the proposed rule must be received by 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 14, 2021.

          ADDRESSES:
          You may submit comments, identified by Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) 1024-AE64, by either of the following methods:
          (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
          (2) By hard copy: Mail to: Superintendent, St. Croix National Scenic Riverway, 401 North Hamilton Street, St. Croix Falls, WI 54024.

            Document Availability: The Cable Connector Trail Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact provide information and context for this proposed rule and are available online at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/sacn by clicking the link entitled “Cable Connector Trail” and then clicking the link entitled “Document List.”

            Instructions: Comments will not be accepted by fax, email, or in any way other than those specified above. All submissions received must include the words “National Park Service” or “NPS” and must include the docket number or RIN (1024-AE64) for this rulemaking. Comments received may be posted without change to www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.

            Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to www.regulations.gov and search for “1024-AE64”.

          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

          Julie Galonska, Superintendent, St. Croix National Scenic Riverway; (715) 483-2270, julie_galonska@nps.gov.

        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
        Background
        The Namekagon and St. Croix Rivers flow through some of the most scenic and least developed country in the Upper Midwest. The free-flowing character and exceptional water quality of these waterways serve as a unique ecological corridor in northwest Wisconsin and eastern Minnesota that sustains a diversity of aquatic and terrestrial wildlife and habitats.
        In 1968, to preserve, protect, and enhance this unique national resource for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations, Congress established the St. Croix National Scenic Riverway, a 230-mile long protected area that includes the Namekagon River, as one of the original eight rivers protected under the national Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. In 1972, the Lower St. Croix National Scenic Riverway was added to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Together, these areas form the Riverway.
        Today, the rivers continue to flow unimpeded for considerable distances as they have for millennia, through the river corridor, growing and changing in character from their headwaters to the St. Croix's confluence with the Mississippi. The Riverway offers exceptional recreational opportunities for visitors to paddle, boat, camp, hike, fish, explore, and find solitude in a natural setting close to the major metropolitan area of Minneapolis-Saint Paul. The National Park Service (NPS) and state partners work with local communities to maintain the aquatic, cultural, recreational, riparian, scenic-aesthetic, and geologic values of the rivers for the benefit and enjoyment of more than 600,000 annual visitors.
        Cable Connector Trail Environmental Assessment
        The NPS proposes to construct a 0.25-mile connector trail through the Riverway near Cable, Wisconsin. The trail would be designed for hiking, trail running, and bicycle and electric bicycle (e-bike) use, and silent sports in the winter such as fat-tire bicycling, snowshoeing, and cross-country skiing. It would be the first trail at the Riverway open to bicycle use. Construction of the trail would respond to a specific opportunity identified by the NPS and local partners to create a link across public land to provide direct access to the Riverway and new recreational opportunities within the Riverway and on the Chequamegon Area Mountain Bike Association (CAMBA) trail network in Bayfield County, Wisconsin. The trail would be built from the end of a segment of CAMBA's Wild River Trail on a former railroad grade near the Town of Cable, connecting to Parker Road. The trail would provide a critical link to adjoining trails and would serve an important role providing connectivity for several local trail running and biking events that start or finish in the Cable area. The bare soil trail would be built using sustainable trail construction techniques to protect natural and cultural resources. The trail would utilize landforms and natural features exhibiting the natural beauty of the area and would feature a slight crown, shallow grades, open sight lines, and gentle turns to support user safety, provide adequate drainage to minimize braiding, seasonal muddiness, and erosion, and reduce the overall maintenance costs associated with more complex trail features. Signage would clearly indicate allowed uses on the trail. Equestrian and motorized use would not be allowed.

        On September 22, 2020, the NPS published the Cable Connector Trail Environmental Assessment (EA). The EA describes one action alternative (the preferred alternative) and the no-action alternative. Under the preferred alternative, the NPS would construct the 0.25 mile Cable Connector Trail to accommodate bicycle and e-bike use. The EA evaluates (1) the suitability of the Cable Connector Trail for bicycle and e-bike use; and (2) life cycle maintenance costs, safety considerations, methods to prevent or minimize user conflict, and methods to protect natural and cultural resources and mitigate impacts associated with bicycle and e-bike use on the trail. The EA contains a full description of the purpose and need for taking action, the alternatives considered, a map of the affected area, and the environmental impacts associated with the project. After a public review period, on February 1, 2021, the Regional Director for DOI Unified Regions 3, 4 and 5 (Great Lakes) signed a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) that identified the preferred alternative in the EA as the selected alternative. The EA and FONSI may be viewed on the Riverway's planning website at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/sacn by clicking the link entitled “Cable Connector Trail” and then clicking the link entitled “Document List.”
        Proposed Rule

        This proposed rule would implement the selected alternative in the FONSI and authorize the Superintendent to designate the new Cable Connector Trail for traditional bicycle use. This action would comply with NPS regulations 36 CFR 4.30, which require a special regulation to designate new bicycle trails that require construction activities off park roads and outside of developed areas. The proposed rule would add a new paragraph (g) to 36 CFR 7.9, which contains the special regulations for the Riverway. After the trail is constructed, the rule would require the Superintendent to notify the public prior to designating the trail for bicycle use through one or more of the methods listed in 36 CFR 1.7, and identify the designation on maps available at Riverway visitor centers and posted on the Riverway's website (www.nps.gov/sacn). The proposed rule would also authorize the superintendent to establish closures, conditions, or restrictions for bicycle use on the trail after considering public health and safety, resource protection, and other management activities and objectives.
        Bicycle use would not be authorized by the Superintendent until the NPS completes the planning and environmental review process required by NPS regulations at 36 CFR 4.30, including the preparation of a written determination that bicycle use on the new trail is consistent with the protection of the park area's natural, scenic and aesthetic values, safety considerations and management objectives, and will not disturb wildlife or park resources. Consistent with NPS regulations at 36 CFR 4.30(i)(1), after the Cable Connector Trail is opened to traditional bicycles, the Superintendent may open the trail to e-bikes, or specific classes of e-bikes, and will notify the public of any such action pursuant to 36 CFR 1.7. This rule would not affect the use of any existing trails in the Riverway, all of which would remain closed to bicycles.
        The proposed rule would also revise the section heading from “St. Croix National Scenic Rivers” to “St. Croix National Scenic Riverway.” This change is consistent with the commonly used and official name of the Riverway.
        Compliance With Other Laws, Executive Orders and Department Policy
        Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
        Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget will review all significant rules. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this rulemaking is not significant.
        Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order 12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open exchange of ideas. The NPS has developed this rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
        Regulatory Flexibility Act

        This rulemaking would not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This certification is based on information contained in the economic analyses found in the report entitled “Cost-Benefit and Regulatory Flexibility Threshold Analyses: Proposed Rule to Designate a New Trail Connection for Bicycle Use at St. Croix National Scenic Riverway.” The report may be viewed on the Riverway's planning website at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/sacn by clicking the link entitled “Cable Connector Trail” and then clicking the link entitled “Document List.”
        Congressional Review Act (CRA)
        This rulemaking is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule:
        (a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more.
        (b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions.
        (c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
        Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

        This rulemaking does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State, local or tribal governments or the private sector. It addresses public use of national park lands and imposes no requirements on other agencies or governments. A statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
        Takings (Executive Order 12630)
        This rulemaking does not effect a taking of private property or otherwise have takings implications under Executive Order 12630. A takings implication assessment is not required.
        Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
        Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, the rulemaking does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. This proposed rule only affects use of federally-administered lands and waters. It has no direct effects on other areas. A federalism summary impact statement is not required.
        Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
        This rulemaking complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988. This rule:
        (a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be written to minimize litigation; and
        (b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal standards.
        Consultation With Indian tribes (Executive Order 13175 and Department Policy)

        The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its government-to-government relationship with Indian Tribes through a commitment to consultation with Indian tribes and recognition of their right to self-governance and tribal sovereignty. The NPS has evaluated this rulemaking under the criteria in Executive Order 13175 and under the Department's tribal consultation policy and have determined that tribal consultation is not required because the rule will have no substantial direct effect on federally recognized Indian tribes. Nevertheless, in support of the Department of the Interior and NPS commitment for government-to-government consultation, during the EA process, the NPS shared information about the proposed action with 18 federally recognized American Indian Tribes and invited them to consult on the project. None of the 18 Tribes expressed interest in consultation.
        Paperwork Reduction Act
        This rulemaking does not contain information collection requirements, and a submission to the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act is not required. The NPS may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
        National Environmental Policy Act

        The NPS has prepared the EA to determine whether this rule will have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement under the NEPA is not required because of the FONSI. A copy of the EA and FONSI can be found online at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/sacn by clicking the link entitled “Cable Connector Trail” and then clicking the link entitled “Document List.”
        Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211)
        This rulemaking is not a significant energy action under the definition in Executive Order 13211; the rule is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, and the rule has not otherwise been designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a significant energy action. A Statement of Energy Effects in not required.
        Clarity of This Rule
        The NPS is required by Executive Orders 12866 (section 1(b)(12)) and 12988 (section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section 1(a)), and by the Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain language. This means that each rule the NPS publishes must:
        (a) Be logically organized;
        (b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
        (c) Use common, everyday words and clear language rather than jargon;
        (d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
        (e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.

        If you feel that the NPS has not met these requirements, send us comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To better help the NPS revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as possible. For example, you should identify the numbers of the sections or paragraphs that you find unclear, which sections or sentences are too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables would be useful, etc.
        Public Participation

        It is the policy of the Department of the Interior, whenever practicable, to afford the public an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking process. Accordingly, interested persons may submit written comments regarding this proposed rule by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document.
        Public Availability of Comments
        Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time.

          List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
          National parks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

        In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service proposes to amend 36 CFR part 7 as set forth below:

          PART 7—SPECIAL REGULATIONS, AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM

        1. The authority citation for part 7 continues to read as follows:

          Authority:
          54 U.S.C. 100101, 100751, 320102; Sec. 7.96 also issued under D.C. Code 10-137 and D.C. Code 50-2201.07.

        2. Amend § 7.9 by revising the section heading and adding paragraph (g) to read as follows:

          § 7.9
           St. Croix National Scenic Riverway.

          (g) Bicycle Use. (1) The Superintendent may designate all or a portion of the following trail as open to bicycle use:
          (i) Cable Connector Trail (full length of the trail approximately 0.25 miles).
          (ii) [Reserved]
          (2) A map showing trails open to bicycle use will be available at Riverway visitor centers and posted on the Riverway website. The Superintendent will provide notice of all trails designated for bicycle use in accordance with §  1.7 of this chapter. The Superintendent may limit, restrict, or impose conditions on bicycle use, or close any trail to bicycle use, or terminate such conditions, closures, limits, or restrictions in accordance with §  4.30 of this chapter.

          Shannon A. Estenoz,
          Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks Exercising the Delegated Authority of the Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.

      [FR Doc. 2021-14933 Filed 7-15-21; 8:45 am]
      BILLING CODE 4312-52-P


        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
        Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
        49 CFR Parts 385 and 390
        [Docket No. FMCSA-97-2180; formerly FHWA-97-2180]
        RIN 2126-AA07
        Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations: Hazardous Materials Safety Permits; Correction

          AGENCY:
          Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

          ACTION:
          Proposed Rule; correction.

          SUMMARY:

          This document corrects the CFR text to a proposed rule published in the Federal Register on August 19, 2003, regarding Hazardous Materials Safety Permits. The CFR text includes multiple incorrect cross-references to § 385.403(a) and a single incorrect cross-reference to § 385.405(e). This action corrects these errors.

          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
          Mr. James Simmons, (202) 493-0496.
          Correction

          In proposed rule FR Doc. 03-49737, beginning on page 49737 in the issue of August 19, 2003, make the following corrections, in the CFR text. On page 49752 in the first column, in § 385.401, in the ninth paragraph, under the Safety permit definition, on line 5, remove “§ 385.403(a)” and add, in its place, “§ 385.403.”
          On page 49752 in the third column, in § 385.407, paragraph (b)(2), on line 4, remove “§ 385.403(a)” and add, in its place, “§ 385.403.”
          On page 49753 in the first column, in § 385.415, paragraph (a), on line 5, paragraph (c)(1), on line 4, and paragraph (c)(2), on line 7, remove “§ 385.403(a)” and add, in its place, “§ 385.403.”
          On page 49753 in the third column, in § 385.417, on line 4, remove “§ 385.403(a)” and add, in its place, “§ 385.403.”
          On page 49754 in the first column, in § 385.421, paragraph (a)(2), on line 6, remove “§ 385.405(e)” and add, in its place, “§ 385.405(d).”
          On page 49754 in the first column, in § 385.421, paragraphs (a)(5) and (a)(7), on line 9, remove “§ 385.403(a)” and add, in its place, “§ 385.403.”
          On page 49755 in the third column, in § 390.3, paragraph (g)(1), on line 3, and paragraph (g)(4), on line 4, remove “§ 385.403(a)” and add, in its place, “§ 385.403.”

            Dated: September 3, 2003.
            Annette M. Sandberg,
            Administrator.

      [FR Doc. 03-23187 Filed 9-10-03; 8:45 am]
      BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


        DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
        National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
        50 CFR Parts 229, 600, and 635
        [Docket No. 080519678-8685-01]
        RIN 0648-AW65
        Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Atlantic Shark Management Measures; Amendment 3

          AGENCY:
          National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

          ACTION:
          Proposed rule; extension of comment period.

          SUMMARY:
          In order to provide additional opportunities for the public, all five Atlantic Regional Fishery Management Councils, the Atlantic and Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commissions, and other interested parties to comment on the proposed rule for draft Amendment 3 to the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (HMS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP), NMFS is extending the comment period for this action. On July 24, 2009, NMFS published the proposed rule for draft Amendment 3 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP. In that proposed rule, the end of the comment period was announced as September 22, 2009, which would allow for a 60-day comment period on the proposed rule. NMFS is now extending the comment period until September 25, 2009 to accommodate two public hearings scheduled on September 22, 2009, and the New England Fishery Management Council meeting September 22 24, 2009. Comments received by NMFS on the proposed rule will help NMFS determine final management measures for small coastal sharks, shortfin mako sharks, and smooth dogfish as described in draft Amendment 3 to the Consolidated HMS FMP.

          DATES:
           The deadline for comments on the proposed rule for draft Amendment 3 to the Consolidated HMS FMP has been extended from September 22, 2009, as published on July 24, 2009 (74 FR 36892), to 5 p.m. on September 25, 2009.

          ADDRESSES:
          As published on July 24, 2009 (74 FR 36892), written comments on this action should be sent to Karyl Brewster-Geisz, Highly Migratory Species Management Division, by any of the following methods:
          • Mail: 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Please mark the outside of the envelope “Shark Amendment 3 Comments.”
          • Fax: (301) 713-1917.

          • Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal http://www.regulations.gov.

          Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted to Portal http://www.regulations.gov without change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.
          NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter “n/a” in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats only.

          Copies of the draft Amendment 3 to the Consolidated HMS FMP, including the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, the latest shark stock assessments, and other documents relevant to this rule are available from the Highly Migratory Species Management Division website at www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms or by contacting LeAnn Southward Hogan at 301-713-2347
        .
          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
          Karyl Brewster-Geisz or LeAnn Southward Hogan at (301) 713-2347, or Jackie Wilson at (240) 338-3936.

        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
        The Atlantic shark fisheries are managed under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP is implemented by regulations at 50 CFR part 635.
        On July 24, 2009 (74 FR 36892), NMFS published the proposed rule for draft Amendment 3 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP, which proposes management measures to rebuild blacknose sharks, end overfishing of blacknose sharks and shortfin mako sharks, and add smooth dogfish under federal management. In that proposed rule, the end of the comment period was announced as September 22, 2009, which would allow for a 60-day comment period on the proposed rule. Due to the timing of two public hearings on September 22, 2009, and the need for NMFS to consult with the New England Fishery Management Council during their September 2009 meeting, NMFS is extending the comment period to provide additional opportunity for the public, all five Atlantic Regional Fishery Management Councils, the Atlantic and Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commissions, and other interested parties to comment on the proposed rule for draft Amendment 3 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP.
        These comments will assist NMFS in determining the final management measures to conserve and manage shark resources and fisheries, consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP.

          Authority:
          5 U.S.C. 561 and 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

          Dated: August 3, 2009.
          Alan D. Risenhoover,
          Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

      [FR Doc. E9-19095 Filed 8-7-09; 8:45 am]
      BILLING CODE 3510-22-S


        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
        Federal Transit Administration
        49 CFR Part 605
        [Docket No. FTA-2008-0044]
        RIN 2132-AB00
        School Bus Operations

          AGENCY:
          Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.

          ACTION:
          Notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal.

          SUMMARY:

          The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) hereby withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding school bus operations published in the Federal Register on November 18, 2008. FTA has determined that withdrawal of the NPRM is appropriate in consideration of public misperceptions with FTA's regulatory proposal.

          DATES:

            Effective Date: The proposed rule, published on November 18, 2008 (73 FR 68375), is withdrawn as of June 26, 2009.

          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

          Michael L. Culotta, Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., East Building-5th Floor, Washington, DC 20590. E-mail: Michael.Culotta@dot.gov.
            Telephone: (202) 366-1936. Facsimile: (202) 366-3809.

        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
        Background
        On November 18, 2008, FTA issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to amend its school bus operations regulations at 49 CFR part 605.1
           FTA issued the NPRM to make the regulations consistent with the changes to the Agency's authorization statute, 49 U.S.C. 5323(f), as amended by Section 3023(f) of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU); 2

           to provide clarification about the regulations in the context of the recent decision by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York in Rochester-Genesee Regional Transportation Authority v. Hynes-Cherin; 3
           and generally, to update the regulation based on experience and industry practice. Through the NPRM, FTA intended to provide its grantees with a regulatory basis which would allow them to continue to provide the service that FTA historically has allowed through administrative adjudications, while simultaneously satisfying the statutory requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5323(f).

            1 Federal Transit Administration, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on School Bus Operations, 73 FR 68375 (Nov. 18, 2008).

            2 Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) sec. 3023, 49 U.S.C. 5323(f) (2006).

            3 531 F.Supp.2d 494 (W.D.N.Y. 2008).

        The comment period for the NPRM closed on February 18, 2009. FTA has received and considered all 233 written comments in response to the NPRM. Although FTA received a good deal of support for the NPRM, many commenters opposed it. Generally, critics of the NPRM believed that FTA was attempting to restrict opportunities for its grantees to provide transportation, when in fact, FTA was attempting to allow its grantees to provide service it historically has allowed. FTA finds, moreover, that many commenters misunderstood FTA's objectives to rectify a significantly outdated regulatory scheme.
        The Withdrawal

        In consideration of the foregoing, FTA hereby withdraws its NPRM on school bus operations for FTA Docket Number FTA-2008-0044, as published in the Federal Register on November 18, 2008 (73 FR 68375). FTA will revisit the issues addressed in the NPRM in the near future.

          Issued in Washington, DC, on this 23rd day of June 2009.
          Peter M. Rogoff,
          Administrator.

      [FR Doc. E9-15346 Filed 6-24-09; 4:15 pm]
      BILLING CODE P