         ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
        40 CFR Part 52
        [EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0105 FRL-9944-94-Region 9]
        Limited Approval, Limited Disapproval of California 9+Air Plan Revisions, Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District

          AGENCY:
          Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

          ACTION:
          Proposed rule.

          SUMMARY:
          The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing a limited approval and limited disapproval of revisions to the Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District (EKAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from motor vehicle and mobile equipment refinishing operations. We are proposing action on a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action.

          DATES:
          Any comments must arrive by May 16, 2016.

          ADDRESSES:

          Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0105 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
          Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415) 972-3024, Lazarus.Arnold@epa.gov.

        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
        Throughout this document, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to the EPA.
        Table of Contents

          I. The State's Submittal
          A. What rule did the State submit?
          B. Are there other versions of this rule?
          C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revision?
          II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
          A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
          B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?
          C. What are the rule deficiencies?
          D. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rule
          E. Proposed Action and Public Comment
          III. Incorporation by Reference
          IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
          A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
          B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
          C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
          D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
          E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
          F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
          G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
          H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
          I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
          J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Population

        I. The State's Submittal
        A. What rule did the State submit?
        Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this proposal with the dates that it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).

          Table 1—Submitted Rule

            Local agency
            Rule #
            Rule title
            Amended
            Submitted

            EKAPCD
            410.4A
            Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Refinishing Operations
            03/13/14
            07/25/14

        On September 11, 2014, the submittal for EKAPCD Rule 410.4A was found to meet the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review.
        B. Are there other versions of this rule?
        We approved an earlier version of Rule 410.4A into the SIP on November 13, 1998 (63 FR 63410). The EKAPCD adopted revisions to the SIP-approved version on March 13, 2014 and CARB submitted them to us on July 25, 2014.
        C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revision?
        VOCs help produce ground-level ozone, smog and particulate matter (PM), which harm human health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States to submit regulations that control VOC emissions. The purpose of this rule is to limit VOC emissions from coatings and solvents used in production, repair, refinish, or maintenance operations where motor vehicles, mobile equipment, or associated parts and components are coated.
        The EPA's technical support document (TSD) has more information about this rule.
        II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
        A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
        SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions reductions (see CAA section 193).

        Generally, SIP rules must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document as well as each major source of VOCs in ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate or above (see CAA section 182(b)(2)). The EKAPCD regulates an ozone nonattainment area classified as Marginal Nonattainment for the 8-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (40 CFR 81.305). In addition, EKAPCD is classified as Moderate for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS (40 CFR 81.305). There is no EPA CTG for Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Refinishing Operations and, according to CARB's facility search engine, there are no facilities that emit VOC in the EKAPCD for this category for the most recent database year of 2013. Therefore, Rule 410.4A is not required to implement reasonably available control technology (RACT) pursuant to CAA section 182(b)(2).

        Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following:

          1. “State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,” 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992).
          2. “Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,” EPA, May 25, 1988 (the “Bluebook,” revised January 11, 1990).
          3. “Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies,” EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the “Little Bluebook”).
          4. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 40, Subpart B, Table 1, “Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Automobile Refinish Coatings” (40 CFR part 59, subpart B, table 1).

        B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?
        Rule 410.4A improves the SIP by establishing more stringent emission limits, and by clarifying labeling, test methods and recordkeeping provisions. The rule is largely consistent with CAA requirements and relevant guidance regarding enforceability, stringency and SIP revisions. Rule provisions that do not meet the evaluation criteria are summarized below and discussed further in the TSD.
        C. What are the rule deficiencies?
        These provisions do not satisfy the requirements of section 110 and part D of title I of the Act and prevent full approval of the SIP revision.
        • Paragraph VI(A), “VOC Content Limits,” provides VOC limits for cavity wax, deadener, gasket/gasket sealing material, lubricating wax/compounds and trunk interior coatings. However, in conflict with long-standing guidance on enforceability such as discussed in the Bluebook, these terms are not defined in the rule.1

            1 See “Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,” (a.k.a., Bluebook) EPA OAQPS, May 25, 1988. P2-7.

        D. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rule
        The TSD describes additional rule revisions that we recommend for the next time the local agency modifies the rule.
        E. Proposed Action and Public Comment
        As authorized in sections 110(k)(3) and 301(a) of the Act, the EPA is proposing a limited approval of the submitted rule. If finalized, this action would incorporate the submitted rule into the SIP, including those provisions identified as deficient. This approval is limited because EPA is simultaneously proposing a limited disapproval of the rule under section 110(k)(3).

        Neither sanctions nor a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) would be imposed should the EPA finalize this limited disapproval. Sanctions would not be imposed under CAA 179(b) because the submittal of Rule 410.4A is discretionary (i.e., not required to be included in the SIP), and the EPA would not promulgate a FIP in this instance under CAA 110(c)(1) because the disapproval does not reveal a deficiency in the SIP for the area that a FIP must correct. Specifically, there is no EPA CTG for Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Refinishing Operations and, according to CARB's Facility Search Engine, there are no facilities that emit VOC in the EKAPCD for this category for the most recent database year of 2013. Accordingly, the failure of the EKAPCD to adopt revisions to Rule 410.4A would not adversely affect the SIP's compliance with the CAA's requirements, such as the requirements for section 182 ozone RACT, reasonable further progress, and attainment demonstrations.
        Note that the submitted rule has been adopted by the EKAPCD, and the EPA's final limited disapproval would not prevent the local agency from enforcing it. The limited disapproval also would not prevent any portion of the rule from being incorporated by reference into the federally enforceable SIP.
        We will accept comments from the public on the proposed limited approval and limited disapproval for the next 30 days.
        III. Incorporation by Reference

        In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference EKAPCD Rule 410.4A as described in Table 1 of this notice. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information).
        IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
        A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
        This action is not a significant regulatory action and was therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review.
        B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
        This action does not impose an information collection burden under the PRA because this action does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
        C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
        I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This action will not impose any requirements on small entities beyond those imposed by state law.
        D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
        This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This action does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, will result from this action.
        E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
        This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
        F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments

        This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175, because the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction, and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

        G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
        The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of “covered regulatory action” in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
        H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
        This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
        I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
        Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs the EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. The EPA believes that this action is not subject to the requirements of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA.
        J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Population
        The EPA lacks the discretionary authority to address environmental justice in this rulemaking.

          List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
          Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

          Authority:
           42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

          Dated: April 4, 2016.
          Jared Blumenfeld,
          Regional Administrator, Region IX.

      [FR Doc. 2016-08508 Filed 4-14-16; 8:45 am]
       BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


        FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
        47 CFR Parts 73 and 74
        [MB Docket Nos. 19-193, 17-105; Report No. 3154; FRS 16953]
        Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Proceeding

          AGENCY:
          Federal Communications Commission.

          ACTION:
          Petitions for Reconsideration.

          SUMMARY:
          Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in the Commission's proceeding by Foundation for a Beautiful Life; and by Todd Urick and Paul Bame (previously commenting under “LPFM/NCE Community-Radio Engineer Advocates” or “LPFM Advocates”), along with Peter Gray (KFZR-LP), Makeda Dread Cheatom (KVIB-LP), Brad Johnson (KGIG-LP), David Stepanyuk (KIEV-LP), and Andy Hansen-Smith (KCFZ-LP).

          DATES:
          Oppositions to the Petition must be filed on or before September 4, 2020. Replies to an opposition must be filed on or before September 14, 2020.

          ADDRESSES:

          Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. Submissions should be filed in the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System at: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/.

          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

          Irene Bleiweiss, Attorney, Media Bureau, Audio Division, (202) 418-2785, Irene.Bleiweiss@fcc.gov.

        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

        This is a summary of the Commission's document, Report No. 3154, released July 21, 2020. The full text may be accessed online via the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System at: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. The Commission will not send a Congressional Review Act (CRA) submission to Congress or the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the CRA, 5.U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because no rules are being adopted by the Commission. This document is being published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 47 CFR 1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g).

          Subject: Amendment of Parts 73 and 74 to Improve the Low Power FM Radio Service Technical Rules; Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative, MB Docket Nos. 19-193, 17-105, Report and Order, FCC 20-53, published at 85 FR 35567, June 11, 2020.

          Number of Petitions Filed: 2.

          Federal Communications Commission.
          Marlene Dortch,
          Secretary, Office of the Secretary.

      [FR Doc. 2020-16558 Filed 8-19-20; 8:45 am]
      BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


        DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
        National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
        50 CFR Part 679
        [Docket No. 040427134-4134-01; I.D. 042004D]
        RIN 0648-AR64
        Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Fish Meal

          AGENCY:
          National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

          ACTION:
          Proposed rule; request for comments.

          SUMMARY:
          NMFS proposes to allow processors to use the offal from Pacific salmon (salmon) and Pacific halibut (halibut) intended for the Prohibited Species Donation (PSD) program for commercial products including fish meal, fish oil, and bone meal.  This action is necessary to change current regulations which prohibit the sale of any parts of salmon or halibut that are processed under the PSD program.  This action is intended to promote the objectives of the PSD program and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act).

          DATES:
          Comments on the proposed rule must be received on or before June 4, 2004.

          ADDRESSES:
          Send comments to Sue Salveson, Assistant Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region, Attn: Lori Durall.  Comments may be submitted by:

        • Mail to NMFS, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802-1668;
        • Hand delivery to the Federal Building, Room 420A, 709 West 9th Street, Juneau, Alaska;
        • FAX to 907-586-7557;
        • E-mail to PSCW-0648-AR64@noaa.gov and include in the subject line of the e-mail comment the document identifier: 0648-AR64; or
        • Website to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http:www.regulations.gov and following the instructions at that site for submitting comments.
        Copies of the Categorical Exclusion and Regulatory Impact Review prepared for this action, and the Environmental Assessment prepared for Amendments 26/29 and Amendments 50/50, may be obtained from the same address.

          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
          Jay Ginter, 907-586-7228, or jay.ginter@noaa.gov.

        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

        NMFS manages the groundfish fishery in the exclusive economic zone of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area (BSAI) under the Fishery Management Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area (BSAI FMP).  NMFS manages the groundfish fishery in the exclusive economic zone of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) under the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA FMP).  The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) prepared, and NMFS approved, the BSAI and GOA FMPs under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.).  Regulations implementing the BSAI and GOA FMPs appear at 50 CFR part 679.  General regulations governing U.S. fisheries also appear at 50 CFR part 600.
        Background
        Prohibited species are defined at § 679.2 to include all species of salmon, steelhead trout, halibut, Pacific herring, king crab and Tanner crab caught by a vessel regulated under part 679 while fishing for groundfish in the BSAI or GOA.
        All prohibited species catch (PSC) is to be avoided, but if caught while fishing for groundfish, prohibited species must be returned to the sea with a minimum of injury, under regulations at § 679.21.
        Some groundfish fishing vessels are incapable of sorting their catch at sea, and deliver their entire catch to an onshore processor or a processor vessel.  Sorting and discarding of prohibited species occurs at delivery.  To reduce the amount of edible protein discarded in that process, the Council initially recommended the PSD program for salmon, which was implemented by NMFS in 1996.  The program was expanded to include halibut in 1997.  Regulations implementing the PSD program are codified at § 679.26.

        The PSD program allows PSC salmon and halibut to be processed and distributed through tax-exempt hunger relief organizations.  The implementing regulations prohibit authorized distributors from consuming or retaining prohibited species for personal use.  They may not sell, trade or barter any prohibited species that is retained under the PSD program.
        In 2001, processors stopped retaining salmon under the PSD program because current regulations prohibit them from processing and selling the waste parts of salmon (eg. heads, guts, bones, skin) that are not distributed under the PSD program.  Processors found it impractical to separate this offal from the offal of commercial groundfish that are rendered into meal and oil products that may be subsequently marketed.
        To stop the processing of PSC salmon and halibut for this reason, however, would defeat the PSD program's purpose of donating fish for hunger relief that otherwise would be discarded.  Therefore, NMFS Enforcement issued an advisory bulletin on April 4, 2002 (Information Bulletin 02-30), stating that NMFS would not enforce regulations that prohibit converting halibut or salmon offal into meal under the PSD program.  According to the bulletin, “NMFS does not believe that retention of Pacific halibut or salmon heads and guts for meal constitutes sufficient potential for revenue to undermine the intent of the PSD program.  Rather, concern continues to be focused on prohibiting the sale, trade or barter of edible flesh.  Therefore, NMFS intends to propose regulations that would clarify the conditions under which parts of prohibited species may be retained by a processor in a manner that would not undermine the intent of the PSD program.”
        This proposed rule would amend the PSD program regulations at § 679.26 (d) to allow processors to convert offal from salmon or halibut that has been prepared for the PSD program into fish meal, fish oil, or bone meal, and retain the proceeds from the sale of these products.  No other regulatory changes are proposed.
        Classification
        NMFS has determined that the proposed rule is consistent with the BSAI and GOA FMPs and initially determined that the rule is consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable laws.
        This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
        NMFS has determined that this action is categorically excluded from the requirement to prepare an environmental assessment, in accordance with NAO 216-6.  The rule falls within the scope of alternatives and impacts addressed in the Environmental Assessments prepared for the BSAI and GOA FMPs Amendments 26/29 and Amendments 50/50 (see ADDRESSES) and implements only minor changes that do not have the potential to pose significant impacts on the quality of the human environment.
        The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.  Certification of this action is appropriate for the following reasons:
        1. The proposed rule does not impose any additional requirements on entities.  Participation in the PSD program is voluntary, so an entity that found the program requirements onerous could stop participating without financial cost to itself.  Moreover, the action relieves a restriction on entities that choose to participate in the PSD program.  By explicitly allowing participating processors to sell the offal of PSC species, this action would allow participating processors to convert offal into commercial products.  Finally, for practical purposes, the proposed rule would bring regulations into conformity with established enforcement policy, thereby maintaining current fishing and processing practices.  For these reasons, this action does not have a significant economic impact on any regulated entities, large or small.
        2. This action does not have an impact on any small entities.  Three seafood processing firms in Dutch Harbor have participated in the PSD program.  None of these firms are small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.  Under criteria established by the Small Business Administration, a seafood processor is a small business if it is independently owned and operated, not dominant in its field of operation, and employs 500 or fewer persons on a full-time, part-time, temporary, or other basis, at all its affiliated operations worldwide.  None of the three participating firms meet this standard.

          List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
          Alaska, Fisheries, Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.

          Dated: April 29, 2004.
          Rebecca Lent
          Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service.

        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 50 CFR part 679 is proposed to be amended as follows:

          PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA

        1. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 679 continues to read as follows:

          Authority:
          16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., 1801 et seq., and 3631 et seq.; Title II of Division C, Pub. L. 105-277; Sec. 3027, Pub. L. 106-31, 113 Stat. 57.

        2. In § 679.26, paragraph (d)(3) is revised to read as follows:

          § 679.26
          Prohibited Species Donation Program.
          (d) ***
          (3) Authorized distributors and persons conducting activities supervised by authorized distributors may retain prohibited species only for the purpose of processing and delivering the prohibited species to hunger relief agencies, food networks or food distributors as provided by this section.  Such persons may not consume or retain prohibited species for personal use and may not sell, trade or barter, or attempt to sell, trade or barter any prohibited species that is retained under the PSD program, except that processors may convert offal from salmon or halibut that has been retained pursuant to the PSD program into fish meal, fish oil, or bone meal, and sell or trade these products.

      [FR Doc. 04-10208 Filed 5-4-04; 8:45 am]
      BILLING CODE 3510-22-S


        DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
        National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
        50 CFR Part 660
        [I.D. 030104B]
        Western Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings

          AGENCY:
          National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

          ACTION:
          Notice of public meetings and hearings.

          SUMMARY:
          The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) will hold its 122nd meeting to consider and take actions on fishery management issues in the Western Pacific Region.

          DATES:

          The meetings and public hearings will be held on March 22, March 23, 24, and 25, 2004.  For specific times, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

          ADDRESSES:
          All meetings and public hearings will be held at Hawaii Convention Center, Kalakaua Avenue, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96814; telephone (808)943-3500.

          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
          Kitty M. Simonds, Executive Director; telephone:  (808)522-8220.

        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
        In addition to the agenda items listed below, the Council will hear recommendations from its Scientific and Statistical Committee, and other ad hoc groups.  Public comment periods will be provided throughout the agenda.  The order in which agenda items are addressed may change.  The Council will meet as late as necessary to complete scheduled business.
        Schedule and Agenda for Council Standing Committee Meetings
        Monday, March 22, 2004
        1.  7:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. Enforcement/Vessel Monitoring System (VMS)
        2.  7:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. Fishery rights of indigenous people
        3.  9 a.m. to 12 noon. International fisheries/pelagics
        4.  9 a.m. to 12 noon. Bottomfish
        5.  1:30 p.m. to 3 p.m. Ecosystem and habitat
        6.  3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Crustaceans and precious corals
        7.  4:30 p.m. to 6 p.m. Executive/budget and program
        Schedule and Agenda for Public Hearings
        Tuesday, March 23, 2004
        11:45 a.m. Proposed regulatory amendment (final action) to Western Pacific Fishery Management Plans to allow fishermen the option of using NMFS approved electronic logbooks instead of paper logbooks.
        Wednesday March 24, 2004
        11:45 a.m. Initial action on a regulatory amendment to implement additional measures to conserve sea turtles and initial action to amend the Fishery Management Plan for the Pelagic Fisheries of the Western Pacific Region (Pelagics FMP) to revise the requirements for seabird mitigation when fishing north of 23° N′ lat. to include side setting as an alternative to one or more of the current suite of seabird mitigation measures.
        Thursday, March 25, 2004
        11:00 a.m. Preliminary options to manage the bottomfish fishery around the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI).  The agenda during the full Council meeting will include the items listed here.
        For more information on public hearing items, see Background Information.
        Schedule and Agenda for Council Meeting
        Tuesday, March 23, 2004
        9:00 a.m. and continue until business is completed.
        1.  Introductions
        2.  Approval of agenda
        3.  Approval of 119th, 120th, and 121st Meeting Minutes
        4.  Island reports of American Samoa, Guam, Hawaii and the CNMI
        5.  Reports from fishery agencies and organizations
        A.  Department of Commerce
        a.  NMFS
        i.  Pacific Islands Regional Office
        ii.  Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center
        b.  NOAA General Counsel Southwest Region
        c.  National Ocean Service
        B.  Department of Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
        C.  U.S. State Department
        6.  Enforcement/VMS
        A.  U.S. Coast Guard activities
        B.  NMFS activities
        C.  Enforcement activities of local agencies
        D.  Status of violations
        E.  National VMS program and policies
        F.  Electronic logbook amendment
        7.  Observer programs
        A.  Report on Northwestern Hawaiian Island (NWHI) Bottomfish program
        B.  Report on native observer program
        8.  Precious coral fisheries
        A.  Report on new beds in the NWHI
        B.  Additional research on Carijoa riisei
        9.  Crustacean fisheries
        A.  Status of lobster research:   Update on Multi-FAN CL lobster model
        10. Fishery rights of indigenous peoples
        A.  Community demonstration projects program (2nd solicitation)
        B.  Guam community monitoring program
        C.  Fishing knowledge education program
        Tuesday, March, 23  2004
        6:30 to 9:00 p.m. Fishers forum:
        1) Federal fishery data collection requirements for Hawaii coral reef and bottomfish fisheries.
        2) Solicitation of public comments on strategic plan for the Pacific Islands/Western Pacific Region.
        Wednesday, March 24, 2004
        8:30 a.m. and continue until business is completed.
        11.  Pelagics/international fisheries
        A.  American Samoa and Hawaii longline quarterly reports
        a.  Quarterly reports
        b.  Southern albacore catch per unit effort in 2003
        B.  Turtle management
        a.  Regulatory amendment to implement new technologies for the Pelagics FMP (including an SEIS)
        b.  Regulatory amendment to implement additional measures to conserve sea turtles (Action Item)
        c.  Post-hooking mortality workshop
        d.  Risk assessment seminar
        e.  New Biological Opinion on pelagic fisheries
        f.  Progress on turtle conservation projects
        C.  Discussion of squid and seabird SEIS
        D.  Seabird conservation
        a.  Consideration of side-setting as an option (Action Item)
        E.  Marlin management
        F.  Private fish aggregation devices
        G.  Shark management
        H.  Marine mammal management
        I.  International meetings
        a.  Bellagio Conference:  Conservation and Sustainable Multilateral Management of Sea Turtles in the Pacific Ocean
        b.  4th Interim Scientific Committee meeting
        c.  Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission 4th Bycatch Working Group

        d.  Asia Region Seabird Bycatch Workshop
        e.  24th Sea Turtle Symposium
        f.  Indian Ocean South East Asia Sea Turtle Conference
        Thursday, March 25, 2004
        8:30 a.m. and continue until business is completed.
        12.  Ecosystems and habitat
        A.  Report on the Coral Reef Fish Stock Assessment Workshop
        B.  NWHI sanctuary alternatives:  rationale and criteria
        C.  Review of Council Marine Protected Area Policy
        D.  National Bycatch Implementation Plan
        13. Bottomfish fisheries
        A.  Report on international deep-slope fishery workshop
        B.  Seamount groundfish moratorium (expires 8/04)
        C.  Report on Hawaii Undersea Research Laboratory project
        D.   Bottomfish Stock Assessment Workshop recommendations
        E.  Preliminary CNMI bottomfish management options (Action Item)
        14. Program planning
        A.  Regulatory streamlining
        B.  Archipelago ecosystem-based management
        C.  Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
        D.  Legislation
        E.  Pacific Islands/Western Pacific Strategic Plan
        F.  Programmatic grants report
        G.  Council Chairs' and Executive Director's meeting
        H.  Status of Hawaii $5 million disaster funds for Federal fisheries
        I.  Annual report
        J.  Federal fishery data collection
        K.  WPacFIN
        15.  Administrative matters
        A.  Financial reports
        B.  Administrative report
        C.  Meetings and workshops
        D.  Advisory group changes
        16. Other Business
        Background Information
        1.  Public Hearing on electronic logbook amendment (Action Item)
        The Council will consider final action on a proposed regulatory amendment to Western Pacific Fishery Management Plans that would allow fishermen the option of using NMFS approved electronic logbook books instead of the Federal paper logbook forms that are now required. In its initial action, the Council recognized that the availability and capability of personal computers has increased to the point where using them to record fisheries dependent information can benefit Western Pacific fishery participants and NMFS.  The benefits of electronic logbook forms include significant time savings for fishery participants, increased data accuracy, and time and money savings for NMFS.
        The alternatives considered in the draft regulatory amendment range from maintaining the current regulations, to requiring the use electronic logbook forms and requiring their transmission via e-mail or satellite systems.  In recognition of the fact that not all fishery participants may have technology or desire to use electronic logbooks, the preferred alternative would amend the five Fishery Management Plans of the Western Pacific to allow the optional use of electronic logbook forms, and the submission of such forms on non-paper media or transmitted via e-mail or satellite systems.  This option would be available to current participants in those fisheries with Federal reporting requirements (meaning fisheries in which participants submit Federal logbooks directly to NMFS) as well as those future participants in fisheries that may become subject to Federal reporting.
        2. Regulatory amendment to implement additional measures to conserve sea turtles (Action Item)
        At its 121st meeting, the Council took action on long term measures to implement new technology to reduce and mitigate turtle-longline interactions in the Hawaii longline fishery.  The Council took final action to recommend management measure to re-establish a limited (2,120 sets annually) Hawaii-based shallow-set fishery using new technologies (circle hooks, mackerel-type bait, and dehookers) to reduce and mitigate sea turtle interactions. However, several additional issues remain unresolved and will be considered by the Council at this meeting. These issues arise out of the fact that a recent Court order will vacate the existing sea turtle conservation regulations effective April 1, 2004.  It is anticipated that the Council's recommended management regime for the Hawaii-based fishery will be implemented on that date, however existing measures for other fisheries will not be replaced without further Council action. These include: (1) A requirement that operators of general longline vessels annually attend protected species workshops and carry workshop completion certificates with them when fishing; (2) a requirement that operators of general longline vessels carry and use dip nets, line clippers, and bolt cutters (longline vessels with less than 3' freeboard such as alias would not have to carry dip nets or long handled line clippers) to release hooked or entangled sea turtles; (3) a requirement that vessels registered to general longline permits do not shallow-set north of the equator.  The Council will also consider whether the current turtle handling requirements for operators of non-longline vessels using hooks to fish for pelagic species in EEZ waters should be supplemented with a requirement to remove trailing gear from hooked or entangled sea turtles.  The Council may consider taking initial action at this meeting to amend the Pelagics FMP to include some or all of these additional measures.
        3. Consideration of side-setting as an option (Action Item)

        In November 2000, the USFWS issued a biological opinion (BiOp) which contained reasonable and prudent measures for minimizing interactions with albatross populations which nest in the NWHI. The BiOp recognized that the Hawaii-based longline fishery at that time comprised two segments, namely a deep-setting tuna-targeting segment, and a shallow-setting swordfish targeting segment. All longline vessels fishing above 23° N′ lat. were required to use thawed blue dyed bait and employ strategic offal discards when setting and hauling the longline. Vessels setting deep to catch tuna were also required to use a line setting machine with weighted branch lines.  Vessels setting shallow to target swordfish were required to begin setting the longline at least 1 hour after local sunset and complete the setting process by local sunrise, using only the minimum vessel lights necessary. The Council amended the Pelagics FMP to require these measures and a final rule was published in May 2002.  However, the final rule did not include a requirement for night setting due to an earlier closure of the swordfish segment of the Hawaii-based fishery in early 2001, under separate rule making in compliance with a March, 2001, BiOp issued by NMFS regarding sea turtles.  The Council recently completed an amendment to the Pelagics FMP which will re-open the swordfish-targeting segment of the Hawaii longline fishery by April 2004, which includes the night setting requirement.  During 2002 and 2003, additional seabird mitigation research field tests were conducted with underwater setting chutes, blue dyed bait and side setting.  Side setting, as the term implies, means setting the longline from the side, rather than from the stern of the vessel. While all measures worked well, side setting was the only method which virtually reduced the interaction rate between longline and seabirds to zero.  However, side setting is not included within the suite of measures required in the USFWS BiOp, nor in the regulations for the Hawaii-based fishery.  The Council may therefore consider taking initial action at this meeting to amend the Pelagics FMP to revise the requirements for seabird mitigation when fishing north of 23° N′ lat. to allow side setting as an alternative to one or more of the current suite of seabird mitigation measure requirements.
        4. Preliminary CNMI bottomfish management options (Action Item)
        A public hearing will be held on preliminary options to manage the bottomfish fishery around the CNMI.  Based on comments received during public scoping meetings held in CNMI, the Council developed preliminary options including limiting the harvest of bottomfish, reporting requirements, establishing area closures, gear and vessel restrictions, and other control measures as suggested by persons during the scoping meetings.  At its 122nd meeting, the Council may take initial action to support a range of alternatives, including selection of a preliminary preferred alternative, to be considered in an amendment to be drafted by Council staff.
        Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come before the Council for discussion, those issues may not be the subject of formal Council action during this meeting.  Council action will be restricted to those issues specifically listed in this document and any issue arising after publication of this document that requires emergency action under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to address the emergency.
        Special Accommodations
        These meetings are physically accessible to people with disabilities.  Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Kitty M. Simonds, (808)522-8220 (voice) or (808)522-8226 (fax), at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

          Authority:
          1801 et seq.

          Dated:  March 4, 2004.
          Bruce C. Morehead,
          Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

      [FR Doc. 04-5291 Filed 3-9-04; 8:45 am]
      BILLING CODE 3510-22-S


        DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
        Fish and Wildlife Service
        50 CFR Part 21
        [Docket No. FWS-HQ-MB-2019-0103; FF09M29000-190-FXMB1232090000]
        RIN 1018-BE67
        Migratory Bird Permits; Management of Double-Crested Cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus) Throughout the United States

          AGENCY:
          Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

          ACTION:
          Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; intent to prepare a National Environmental Policy Act document.

          SUMMARY:

          This document advises the public that we, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, intends to gather information necessary to develop a proposed rule to expand management of double-crested cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus) throughout the United States, and prepare a draft environmental review pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended. We are furnishing this advance notice of proposed rulemaking to advise other agencies and the public of our intentions; obtain suggestions and information on the scope of issues to include in the environmental review; and announce public scoping webinars to occur in 2020.

          DATES:

            Comment submission: Public scoping will begin with the publication of this document in the Federal Register and will continue through March 9, 2020. We will consider all comments on the scope of the draft environmental review that are received or postmarked by that date. Comments received or postmarked after that date will be considered to the extent practicable.

            Scoping meetings: We will hold public scoping meetings in the form of multiple webinars that will occur in February 2020. We will announce exact webinar dates, times, and registration details on the internet at https://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/double-crested-cormorants.php.

          ADDRESSES:
          You may submit written comments by one of the following methods. Please do not submit comments by both.
          (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments to Docket No. FWS-HQ-MB-2019-0103.
          (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: Public Comments Processing, Attn: FWS-HQ-MB-2019-0103; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Headquarters, MS: JAO/1N, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803.

          We do not accept email or faxes. We will post all comments on http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.

          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
          Jerome Ford, Assistant Director, Migratory Birds, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, at 202-208-1050.

        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

        Background
        The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is the Federal agency delegated with the primary responsibility for managing migratory birds. Our authority derives from the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as amended (MBTA), which implements conventions with Great Britain (for Canada), Mexico, Japan, and the Russia Federation. The MBTA protects certain migratory birds from take, except as permitted under the MBTA. We implement the provisions of the MBTA through regulations in parts 10, 13, 20, 21, and 22 of title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Regulations pertaining to migratory bird permits are at 50 CFR part 21.
        The double-crested cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus, [cormorants]) is a fish-eating migratory bird that is distributed across a large portion of North America. There are five different breeding populations of cormorants, variously described by different authors as the Alaska, Pacific Coast, Interior, Atlantic, and Southern populations. Cormorant populations have exhibited increasing abundance over the last few decades. In response to ongoing damage at aquaculture facilities and other damage and conflicts associated with increasing cormorant populations, the Service administered regulations that included an Aquaculture Depredation Order (which was located at 50 CFR 21.47) and a Public Resource Depredation Order (which was located at 50 CFR 21.48) from October 2003 until May of 2016.
        The Aquaculture Depredation Order eliminated individual permit requirements in 13 States for private individuals, corporations, State agencies, and Federal agencies taking cormorants at aquaculture facilities. The Public Resource Depredation Order enabled States, Tribes, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Wildlife Services in 24 States, without individual depredation permits, to take cormorants found committing or about to commit, and to prevent, depredations on the public resources of fish (including hatchery stock at Federal, State, and Tribal facilities), wildlife, plants, and their habitats. In May of 2016, the depredation orders were vacated by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The Court concluded that the Service did not sufficiently consider the effects of the depredation orders on cormorant populations and other affected resources and failed to consider a reasonable range of alternatives in the review within the environmental assessment issued under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA), in 2014. The authority for authorizing lethal take of depredating cormorants reverted back to the issuance of individual depredation permits pursuant to 50 CFR 21.41.
        Conflicts in aquatic systems continue to exist between cormorants and fish stocks managed by Federal, State, and Tribal agencies as recreational and/or commercial fisheries, or for species-conservation purposes. Cormorant predation of fish also occurs at aquaculture facilities and private recreational lakes and ponds. Birders and other interested parties value cormorants for their aesthetic and existential values.
        The Service is responsible for determining the maximum amount of lethal take of cormorants to allow in order to minimize conflicts in aquatic systems, while maintaining sustainable populations of cormorants and minimizing the regulatory burden on Federal and State agencies and individual citizens. In the process of making this decision, the Service wants to use an effective and transparent decision-making process that ensures collaboration among migratory bird and fisheries management programs, fulfills Tribal trust and subsistence responsibilities, adheres to legal and regulatory requirements under NEPA, and addresses key biological uncertainties. When determining total allowable take, the Service must consider uncertainty related to cormorant population dynamics, estimated maximum sustainable harvest, and risk of over-exploitation. Furthermore, the Service and stakeholders must identify appropriate monitoring requirements that ensure progress toward stated objectives and inform future decisions regarding total allowable take.
        Public Scoping
        A primary purpose of the NEPA scoping process is to receive suggestions and information on the scope of issues and alternatives to consider when drafting the environmental documents and to identify significant issues and reasonable alternatives related to the Service's proposed action. In order to ensure that we identify a range of issues and alternatives related to the proposed action, we invite comments and suggestions from all interested parties. We will conduct a review of this proposed action according to the requirements of NEPA and its regulations, other relevant Federal laws, regulations, policies, and guidance, and our procedures for compliance with applicable regulations. Once the environmental documents are completed, we will offer further opportunities for public comment.
        Proposed Action and Possible Alternatives
        The Service has collaborated with State fish and wildlife agencies, Tribes, and Federal partners in further addressing cormorant conflicts including aquaculture and wild and stocked fisheries. In this rulemaking action, we propose these long-term solutions to cormorant conflicts:

        (1) Establish a new permit for State wildlife agencies for authorizing certain cormorant management and control activities that are normally prohibited and are intended to relieve or prevent impacts from cormorants on wild and stocked fisheries, aquaculture facilities, human health and safety, property, and threatened and endangered species (as listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)). States would have the delegated authority to determine whether, when, where, and for what purposes to control cormorants within limits set by the Service.
        (2) Establish an aquaculture depredation order, which would allow take of cormorants under prescribed conditions at aquaculture facilities without the need to acquire an individual permit.
        (3) Both (1) and (2) in combination.

        The proposed action presented in the environmental analysis will be compared to the no-action alternative. The no-action alternative will compare estimated future conditions without implementation of the alternatives listed here to the estimated future conditions with those alternative actions in place (i.e., issuance of individual depredation permits pursuant to 50 CFR 21.41).
        Information Requested
        Issues Related to the Scope of the NEPA Review
        We seek comments or suggestions from the public, governmental agencies, Tribes, the scientific community, industry, or any other interested parties. To promulgate a proposed rule and prepare a draft environmental review pursuant to NEPA, we will take into consideration all comments and any additional information received. To ensure that any proposed rulemaking effectively evaluates all potential issues and impacts, we are seeking comments and suggestions on the following for consideration in preparation of additional management for double-crested cormorants:
        a. Assessment of interest in use of a new special permit by States and Tribes;
        b. Appropriate limitations to cormorant management and control activities, such as season, scope, and magnitude of expected lethal take; and
        c. Potential reporting and monitoring strategies of cormorants by States and participating Tribes.
        The Service will act as the lead Federal agency responsible for completion of the environmental review. Therefore, we are seeking comments on the identification of direct, indirect, beneficial, and adverse effects that might be caused by additional management for double-crested cormorants. You may wish to consider the following issues when providing comments:
        a. Impacts on floodplains, wetlands, wild and scenic rivers, or ecologically sensitive areas;
        b. Impacts on park lands and cultural or historic resources;
        c. Impacts on human health and safety;
        d. Impacts on air, soil, and water;
        e. Impacts on prime agricultural lands;
        f. Impacts to other species of wildlife, including endangered or threatened species;
        g. Disproportionately high and adverse impacts on minority and low-income populations;
        h. Any other potential or socioeconomic effects; and
        i. Any potential conflicts with other Federal, State, local, or Tribal environmental laws or requirements.
        Public Availability of Comments

        Written comments we receive become part of the public record associated with this action. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that the entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Comments and materials we receive, as well as supporting documentation we use in preparing the environmental analysis, will be available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Headquarters (see ADDRESSES, above).
        Scoping Meetings
        See DATES for information about upcoming scoping webinars. The purpose of scoping webinars is to provide the public with a general understanding of the background of the proposed rule, alternatives and activities it would cover, alternative proposals under consideration, and the Service's role and steps to be taken to develop the draft environmental analysis for the proposed action. Additionally, the purpose of these meetings and public comment period is to solicit suggestions and information on the scope of issues and alternatives for the Service to consider when preparing the draft environmental documents. Oral comments will be accepted at the webinars.
        Comments can also be submitted by methods listed in ADDRESSES. Once the draft environmental documents and proposed rule are complete and made available for review, there will be additional opportunity for public comment on the content of these documents through an additional comment period.
        Scoping Webinar Accommodations
        Please note that the Service will ensure that the public scoping webinars will be accessible to members of the public with disabilities.
        Public Comments
        To promulgate a proposed rule and prepare a draft environmental review pursuant to NEPA, we will take into consideration all comments and any additional information received. Please note that submissions merely stating support for or opposition to the proposed action and alternatives under consideration, without providing supporting information, will be noted but not considered by the Service in making a determination. Please consider the following when preparing your comments:
        a. Be as succinct as possible.
        b. Be specific. Comments supported by logic, rationale, and citations are more useful than opinions.
        c. State suggestions and recommendations clearly with an expectation of what you would like the Service to do.
        d. If you propose an additional alternative for consideration, please provide supporting rationale and why you believe it to be a reasonable alternative that would meet the purpose and need for our proposed action.
        e. If you provide alternate interpretations of science, please support your analysis with appropriate citations.
        The alternatives we develop will be analyzed in our draft environmental review pursuant to NEPA. We will give separate notice of the availability of the draft environmental review for public comment when it is completed. We may hold public hearings and informational sessions so that interested and affected people may comment and provide input into the final decision.
        Authority

        The authority for this action is the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.) and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).

          Dated: December 6, 2019.
          Rob Wallace,
          Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.

      [FR Doc. 2020-00616 Filed 1-21-20; 8:45 am]
       BILLING CODE 4333-15-P


        FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
        47 CFR Part 73
        [DA 08-1711; MB Docket No. 08-150; RM-11390]
        Radio Broadcasting Services; Asbury and Maquoketa, IA, and Mineral Point, WI

          AGENCY:
          Federal Communications Commission.

          ACTION:
          Proposed rule.

          SUMMARY:

          The Audio Division at the request of KM Radio of Independence, LLC, licensee of Station KQMG-FM, Independence, Iowa, proposes the allotment of Channel 238A at Mineral Point, Wisconsin, as its first local service, and the substitution of Channel *254A, reserved for noncommercial educational (NCE) use, for vacant Channel *238A, reserved for NCE use, at Asbury, Iowa to accommodate a hybrid community of license application, proposing the substitution of Channel 236A for Channel 237A at Independence, Iowa, the reallotment of Channel 236A to Solon, Iowa, and the associated modification of the license of Station KQMG-FM. See File No. BPH-20070119AEI. To facilitate the hybrid community of license application and the proposed Asbury channel substitution, the Commission issue an order to show cause to Maquoketa Broadcasting Company, licensee of Station KMAQ-FM, Channel 236A, Maquoketa, Iowa, as to why KMAQ-FM's channel should not be changed to Channel 237A at Maquoketa. See
            Supplementary Information.

          DATES:
          Comments must be filed on or before September 22, 2008, and reply comments on or before October 7, 2008.

          ADDRESSES:
          Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should serve the petitioner, as follows: Jeffrey L. Timmons, Esq., Counsel to KM Radio of Independence, LLC, 1400 Buford Highway, Suite G-5, Sugar Hill, Georgia 30518.

          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
          Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180.

        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

        This is a synopsis of the Commission's Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 08-150, adopted July 30, 2008, and released August 1, 2008. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY-A257, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. This document may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractors, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or via e-mail http://www.BCPIWEB.com. This document does not contain proposed information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed information collection burden “for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,” pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
        A staff engineering analysis confirms that Channel 238A can be allotted to Mineral Point consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's rules at city reference coordinates 42-51-36 NL and 90-10-47 WL. Additionally, a staff engineering analysis indicates that Channel *254A can be allotted to Asbury consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Rules with a site restriction 3.7 kilometers (2.3 miles) southwest of the community located at reference coordinates 42-29-23 NL and 90-46-56 WL. Moreover, Channel 237A can be allotted at Station KMAQ-FM's current licensed site at coordinates 42-05-26 NL and 90-37-43 WL.
        Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to this proceeding.

        Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing permissible ex parte contacts.

        For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

          List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
          Radio, Radio broadcasting.

        For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 73 as follows:

          PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES
          1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

             Authority:
            47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.

            § 73.202
            [Amended]
            2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Iowa, is amended by removing Channel *238A and by adding Channel *254A at Asbury.
            3. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Wisconsin, is amended by adding Mineral Point, Channel 238A.

            Federal Communications Commission.
            Robert A. Haynes,
            Senior Attorney.

       [FR Doc. E8-19647 Filed 8-25-08; 8:45 am]
      BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


        ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
        40 CFR PART 82
        [FRL-9906-16-OAR]
        Request for Public Engagement in the Interagency Special Report on the Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States

          AGENCY:
          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on behalf of the United States Global Change Research Program (USGCRP).

          ACTION:
          Request for Public Submissions of Comments on a Draft Report Prospectus, Information, and Contributing Author Nominations, and Notice of a Public Forum.

          SUMMARY:
          As part of the President's Climate Action Plan and ongoing efforts within the US Global Change Research Program (USGCRP), the Interagency Crosscutting Group on Climate Change and Human Health (CCHHG) and a subset of the Interagency National Climate Assessment Working Group (INCA) have initiated an interagency Special Report on the impacts of observed and projected climate change on human health in the United States. This data-driven technical synthesis and assessment will be an interagency product of the USGCRP organized by the CCHHG. This request for public engagement presents opportunities to submit comments on the Draft Report Prospectus, scientific information to inform the assessment, and nominations for contributing authors, and announces a Public Forum to Inform the Interagency Special Report on the Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States.

          DATES:

            Comments: Comments on the draft prospectus, information to inform the Special Report, and contributing author nominations may be submitted during a 30-day period beginning March 1, 2014. All submissions should be received by USGCRP on or before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. March 31, 2014. The Public Forum will be held March 13, 2013 from 10 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern Time.

            Public Forum: The Public Forum, organized by the CCHHG, will be held on March 13, 2014.

          ADDRESSES:
          The March 13, 2014 Public Forum will be held at the EPA William Jefferson Clinton East building, Room 1153, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460. To register, please follow the detailed instructions as provided below.

          Information in response to the Request for Comments on the Draft Prospectus, Call for Information, and Call for Contributing Author Nominations must be submitted electronically at: http://globalchange.gov/component/content/article/990.

          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

          For details on the period for submission of scientific information, comments on the Draft Prospectus, and call for contributing author nominations from the public, please contact Allison Crimmins; telephone: 202-343-9170; or email: healthreport@usgcrp.gov.
          [Responses to this notice are not offers and cannot be accepted by the Government to form a binding contract or issue a grant. Information obtained as a result of this request may be used by the government. Please do not include any information that might be considered proprietary or confidential.]

        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
        I. Request for Comment on Draft Report Prospectus
        A. How to Submit Comments on the Draft Prospectus
        The Draft Prospectus presented in Section I.B of this Notice describes proposed plans for scoping, drafting, reviewing, producing, and disseminating the Interagency Special Report on the Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States. EPA invites interested parties to review the Draft Prospectus and provide comments within the 30-day public comment period, beginning March 1, 2014 and ending 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time March 31, 2014. The EPA and the CCHHG are seeking comments on the Special Report objectives, proposed topics, and process as outlined in the Draft Prospectus. Public comments received on the Draft Prospectus will be evaluated and used to inform the Special Report Final Prospectus.
        Comments on the Draft Prospectus can be made at: http://globalchange.gov/component/content/article/990.
        B. Draft Prospectus for the Interagency Special Report on the Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: An Assessment of Observed and Projected Climate Change Impacts on Human Health in the U.S.
        (1) Overview
        As part of the President's Climate Action Plan and ongoing efforts within the US Global Change Research Program (USGCRP), the Interagency Crosscutting Group on Climate Change and Human Health (CCHHG) and a subset of the Interagency National Climate Assessment Working Group (INCA) have initiated an Interagency Special Report on the Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States. This data-driven technical synthesis and assessment will be an interagency product of the USGCRP, organized by the CCHHG.
        The Special Report will be an evidence-based, quantitative assessment of observed and projected climate change impacts on human health in the United States. Development of the report will leverage existing activities of the CCHHG and INCA members, aggregate and assess current quantitative research on human health impacts of climate change, and summarize the current state of the science. As a technical scientific assessment, the Special Report will extend the work begun under the 2008 Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.6 (SAP 4.6) Analyses of the Effects of Global Change on Human Health and Welfare and Human Systems and the forthcoming third National Climate Assessment (NCA) by using modeling and analysis tools to quantify, where possible, projected national-scale impacts of climate change to human health. Such analyses will attempt to identify and bound impact uncertainties, as well as better define changes in attributable epidemiological risks, particularly for vulnerable populations, with the goal of informing public health authorities and other public planning and resource management entities.
        The lead and coordinating Federal agencies for the Special Report are the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institute of Health (NIH), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
        (2) Proposed Focus Areas
        The proposed scope of the Special Report will cover the following eight focus areas, which will each comprise a section of the Special Report:
        (a) Thermal Extremes: Heat and Cold Waves
        (b) Air Quality Impacts
        (c) Vectorborne and Zoonotic Disease
        (d) Waterborne and Foodborne Diseases
        (e) Food Safety
        (f) Extreme Weather and Climate Events
        (g) Mental Health and Stress-Related Disorders
        (h) Vulnerable Regions and Subpopulations to Health Impacts of Climate Change

        The authors will review and assess the literature in each focus area in order to summarize the state of the science regarding observed and projected health-related climate change impacts and associated changes in risk. Four sections of the Special Report propose to go beyond the assessment of literature to present additional modeling and/or quantitative analyses of the projected health impacts from climate change. Additional quantitative analyses conducted for the Special Report are proposed in the areas of:
        (1) Extreme Heat Mortality
        (2) Air Quality Impacts (Ozone or PM 2.5)
        (3) Lyme Disease
        (4) Vibrio-related Illness.
        The sections below provide more detail on the scope of observations and projections that will be included in each section.
        (a) Observed Climate Change Impacts on Human Health
        Where possible, the Special Report will identify relationships between global, national, and regional climate changes and associated impacts on human health in the United States over the last century. Each section will include a “state of the science” overview aimed at understanding observed impacts and developing/maintaining climate-health indicators. Because the impacts of climate change on health are complex and often dependent on multiple confounding socioeconomic and environmental factors, the methodology for developing appropriate climate and health indicators is challenging and still emerging. The authors of each section will leverage current efforts across multiple agencies to begin to address methodological challenges and further develop climate and health indicators, including the NCA indicator work and ongoing efforts at the EPA, CDC (through the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network), NIH (in collaboration with World Health Organization), and others.
        Though it is often difficult to attribute the exact impact of climate on many health indicators due to confounding factors (e.g., the ability of communities to prepare for and respond to the risks posed by climate change; the vulnerability of different populations and communities), such indicators will be instrumental not only in tracking and measuring health impacts of climate change, but also in identifying areas where public health intervention is most needed or likely to be most effective. A more comprehensive set of indicators will collectively demonstrate and communicate observed changes in climate change risk to Americans.

        Where quantitative national indicators are not available, or where health impacts are too secondary or indirect in nature to attribute to climate change, a qualitative examination of the state of the science will provide context for these additional health threats and may serve to identify areas for future research. Further investigation of the impacts of climate change on Americans' overall well-being and welfare, though important, is beyond the scope of this report.
        (b) Projected Changes in Health Risks
        While certain advances in the state of the science over the last five years are evident, research on projected changes in future health risk under different climate scenarios is in varying stages of development. As such, each section of the Special Report will seek to summarize the literature on modeling and quantification efforts regarding climate impacts on human health. The authors will pay special attention to research that frames risks in terms of probability-based changes in exposure, vulnerability, and adaptive capacity.

        As stated previously, four sections will include additional quantitative analyses to evaluate a range of possible changes in future health-related climate impacts and risks: (1) Extreme Heat Mortality; (2) Air Quality Impacts (Ozone or PM2.5); (3) Lyme Disease; and (4) Vibrio-related Illness. The authors will leverage existing or ongoing research or analytical efforts to derive additional quantitative analyses developed specifically for this report. This work will identify areas where probabilistic changes in attributable risks can be characterized, and where scientific uncertainty has been better defined since the publication of SAP 4.6. Each section will utilize established processes for determining and reporting confidence levels and likelihood of specific impacts across a range of scenarios and possible outcomes, and will articulate all standards or modeling assumptions. Existing products from other agency workgroups, such as the USGCRP's Metadata Access Tool for Climate and Health (MATCH) online database, will be incorporated as appropriate.
        For certain health outcomes, research that characterizes human health risks in terms of probability-based changes in exposure or vulnerability may provide a way to contextualize health risks in terms relevant for public health officials and planners. For example, the relationship between projected temperature increases and certain waterborne pathogens (e.g., Vibrio bacteria) is well known, but the link between projected changes in exposure to these pathogens and the projected increase in disease incidence remain uncertain. Thus, a probability-based metric of changes in vulnerability may be used to simply and clearly communicate changes in risk into the future and under alternative climate scenarios where a robust national projection in the annual number of cases of such diseases is not possible to derive at this time. Where appropriate, such risk-based framing will be highly valuable to informing efforts aimed at preventing or responding to climate impacts. In addition, this section may provide a framework for conveying complex changes in risk under uncertainty by mapping especially vulnerable populations or sites specifically related to environmental justice concerns.
        (c) Other Report Scope Considerations

          Geographical Scope: The focus of the Special Report is on impacts within the United States. The report may consider global linkages and implications where appropriate. For instance, global studies may be considered for certain impact areas where there is a lack of long-term, consistent historical monitoring, such as the health impacts of extreme weather events. In some instances, regional studies may be more appropriate in geographic areas where risk is not homogenous across the nation, such as the spread of Lyme Disease.

          Timescales: While climate change is observed and measured on long-term (30+ years) time scales, decision frameworks for public health officials and regional planners are often based on much shorter time scales, determined by epidemiological, political, and/or budgeting factors. This Special Report will quantify the implications of overlaying impact trends that occur on typical climatological time frames (e.g., from changes in extreme weather events to end-of-century projections of impacts such as sea level rise) on data from epidemiological time frames (e.g., from immediate or episodic health threats to cumulative exposure or the appearance of developmental effects).

          Uncertainty: Uncertainty will be characterized as qualitative confidence levels and, where possible, quantitative probabilistic likelihoods of specific impacts across a range of scenarios and possible outcomes. Measures of uncertainty expressed in the Special Report will be based on scientific evidence, statistical analysis of observations or model results, and expert judgment. The Special Report will follow NCA guidelines for transparent reporting of likelihood, confidence, and uncertainty findings.

          Complex Linkages and Potentially Confounding Factors: Many factors will affect the impact of climate change on human health; not all of these factors will be addressed in the Special Report. For example, a population's vulnerability (1) may be affected by direct climate changes or by non-climate factors (e.g., changes in population dynamics, economic development, education, infrastructure, behavior, technology, and ecosystems); (2) may differ across regions and in urban, rural, and coastal communities; and (3) may be influenced by individual vulnerability factors such as age, socioeconomic status, and existing physical and/or mental illness or disability. In addition, climate change or other non-climate factors will cause changes in adaptive capacity, ranging from an individual's ability to acclimatize to different meteorological conditions to a community's ability to prepare for and recover from damage, injuries, and lives lost due to extreme weather events. Attribution and detection considerations will be discussed in the introductory section(s) of the Special Report. However, projections of many of the factors listed above, and many other compounding, secondary, or indirect climate effects, though important to consider as part of a comprehensive assessment of changes in risks, may be beyond the scope of this report.

          Research Needs: While the goal of the Special Report is to highlight the current state of the science regarding climate impacts on health, research needs identified through the development of this assessment will be briefly summarized in the concluding section(s), as they may serve to inform ongoing gap analyses being conducted outside the scope of this Special Report.
        (3) Process
        (a) Audience, and Communicating Health Risks Associated With Climate Change

        The Special Report will be designed to inform public health officials, urban planners, decision makers, and other stakeholders at multiple levels of government who are interested in better understanding the risks climate change presents to human health. The goal of this Special Report is to provide these groups with updated information on the observed and projected impacts of climate change on human health and changes in risk to health. Though the report will not include policy recommendations, this information may help inform adaptation decisions and other strategies in the public health arena. Better definitions of health risk and uncertainty will improve hazard identification and allow for better-coordinated responses to the impacts of climate change on human health. To that end, the Special Report will also highlight ongoing research focused on quantifying the risks to health associated with climate change.
        (b) Lead Authors, Contributing Authors, and Required Expertise
        Authors will be selected based on their demonstrated subject matter expertise, their relevant publications and knowledge of specific topics designated in the draft outline, their demonstrated writing abilities and accomplishments, and their availability, such that they can aid in the development of a robust scientific, technical assessment. As a federal interagency report, the selection of lead authors will be limited to Federal employees and their contractors. Lead Authors may include a selection of CCHHG members, attendees of an initial scoping workshop, and other federal colleagues and contractors with relevant expertise. There is potential for additional cooperation with existing efforts, including the NCA indicators team, NIH literature review workgroup, and other agency collaborations.

        Contributing Authors with relevant subject matter expertise may be nominated by lead authors, CCHHG or other interagency members, and the general public (through this public Federal Register notice calling for contributing author nominations). Contributing Authors may be federal employees or non-federal subject experts. If needed to fill gaps in expertise, Contributing Authors will be selected through an independent process led by an EPA contractor based on expertise (e.g., scholarly publications, etc.) and other criteria.

        Collectively, the Lead and Contributing Authors will be responsible for preparing the initial draft of the report, including the text and any analysis required to synthesize the underlying studies on which the Special Report is based. Authors will rely on existing peer-reviewed literature as a basis for the report. Lead Authors will decide how best to organize their respective teams, including division of responsibility and time requirements among the Contributing and Lead Authors. In addition, Lead Authors and Contributing Authors will be responsible for reviewing relevant literature submissions made through this Federal Register Notice call for information to inform the Special Report, and for responding to public comments on the Draft Special Report. All authors should be accomplished writers and have demonstrated technical backgrounds in at least one field relevant to the implications of climate change on human health in the United States.
        (c) Agency Roles
        The CCHHG will be responsible for compiling and synthesizing contributions from all authors. From within the CCHHG, a steering committee for the Special Report has been established to provide guidance and coordination to staff/authors. Lead agencies (EPA, NOAA, CDC, NIH) will provide staff support including, where appropriate, contractor support. EPA will serve a coordinating function to include providing support and facilitation of two planning workshops to bring together CCHHG members, federal agency experts, and supporting contractors, as appropriate. The workshops will serve to facilitate the scoping and development of report outlines and drafts, and to identify any model analyses or data retrieval needed for the assessment. EPA will work closely with the CCHHG Steering Committee to provide others (e.g., USGCRP) with regular progress updates.
        (d) Information Quality and Peer Review
        The Special Report will be a federal interagency USGCRP product. As such, the process for preparation will be consistent with the guidelines for preparing USGCRP products, with referenced materials derived primarily from the existing peer-reviewed scientific literature and consistent with USGCRP guidance regarding use of grey literature. The report will follow federal information quality, transparency, and accessibility guidelines, and will undergo peer review, public review, and final interagency review.
        (e) Process for Public Engagement and Publication

        The CCHHG Steering Committee plans to provide a number of opportunities for public engagement in scoping, informing, and reviewing the Special Report. During the initial scoping phase, the following opportunities will be available as described in this Federal Register Notice:
        (i) Notice of Request for Comments on Draft Report Prospectus: A 30-day call for comments on the Special Report objectives, proposed topics, and process as outlined in the Draft Prospectus.
        (ii) Call for Information: A 30-day call for submissions of recent, relevant, scientific and/or technical research studies on observed and/or projected climate change impacts on human health in the United States that have been peer-reviewed and published or accepted for publication.
        (iii) Nominations for Contributing Authors: A 30-day call for nominations of Contributing Authors to assist chapter author teams in the development of the Special Report chapters or sections. Interested parties are invited to submit nominations of subject matter experts, with descriptions of relevant expertise and publications
        (iv) Notice of Public Forum to Inform the Interagency Special Report on the Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A free and open public forum to be convened March 13, 2014 at a federal facility in Washington, DC to facilitate engagement with stakeholders, non-federal subject matter experts, and interested public.

        After completion of a Public Review Draft of the Special Report, EPA on behalf of the USGCRP will issue a second Federal Register Notice to announce a 45-day public comment period for the draft report. The public will be able to view the Draft Special Report and submit comments to an online docket available on the USGCRP's Web site. The CCHHG Steering Committee will also work to schedule side events, presentations at relevant conferences, and webinars to further engage the community of experts and the general public. Public comments received on the Draft Special Report will be evaluated and used to inform the final report.
        The CCHHG and USGCRP will publish the final Special Report electronically and consider options for hard copy publication. They will also explore options for online integration with future phases of the USGCRP's Global Change Information System. A full communications plan will be developed by the lead and supporting agencies along with designated authors, with input and assistance from the USGCRP communications team.
        (f) Proposed Timing
        The Special Report is an interim report, designed to be released after the third and before the fourth National Climate Assessments. A draft of the Special Report is expected to be made available for public comment early in 2015, with final publication expected in late 2015.
        II. Call for Relevant Scientific Information To Inform the Special Report

        Interested parties are invited to assist the EPA and USGCRP in collecting and refining the scientific information base for the assessment. To do so, parties are asked to submit recent, relevant, scientific and/or technical research studies on observed and/or projected climate change impacts on human health in the United States that have been peer-reviewed and/or published or accepted for publication in the peer reviewed literature.

        All scientific literature submitted in response to this call for information must be received within the 30-day call for information period, beginning March 1, 2014 and ending 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on March 31, 2014. Submissions must be uploaded electronically at: http://globalchange.gov/component/content/article/990.

        III. Call for Contributing Authors Nominations
        EPA and the CCHHG are also calling for nominations for Contributing Authors to assist specific chapter author teams in the development of the Special Report chapters or sections. Interested parties are invited to submit nominations of subject matter experts, with descriptions of relevant expertise and publications. Contributing authors will assist in the preparation of specific sections of the report, working closely with chapter author leads and teams. Submissions must demonstrate that nominees are accomplished English-speaking writers with demonstrated technical backgrounds, such that they can aid in the development of a robust scientific, technical assessment as subject matter experts in one or more of the following areas of climate-related health impacts:
        (a) Thermal Extremes: Heat and Cold Waves
        (b) Air Quality Impacts
        (c) Vectorborne and Zoonotic Disease
        (d) Waterborne and Foodborne Diseases
        (e) Food Safety
        (f) Extreme Weather and Climate Events
        (g) Mental Health and Stress-Related Disorders related to Climate Change
        (h) Vulnerable Regions and Subpopulations to Health Impacts of Climate Change

        Responses to this request must be made within the 30-day call for Contributing Author nominations period, beginning March 1, 2014 and ending 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on March 31, 2014. A completed nomination form, including a curriculum vitae or resume for each nominee that demonstrates the nominee's relevant area of expertise, must be submitted electronically at: http://globalchange.gov/component/content/article/990. The curriculum vitae or resume must be in English and preferably no more than 5 pages, identifying topical expertise and relevant publications. The nomination form will also ask for a brief statement of primary expertise (e.g., projected climate impacts on air quality, climate-related vectorborne diseases, waterborne diseases in the U.S.). Please also ensure that curriculum vitae or resume include address, phone number, email address, education, and the following information, if applicable: professional association membership, committee involvement, involvement in the development of other scientific assessments, scientific publications in this field, and relevant leadership activities.
        IV. How To Register for the Public Forum To Inform the Interagency Special Report on the Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States

        The Public Forum will be held on March 13, 2014, at the EPA William Jefferson Clinton East building, Room 1153, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460. It is open and free to the public, but with limited space available. The first 120 people to register may attend. Registration will be available beginning February 13, 2014. Please register by going to http://globalchange.gov/component/content/article/990. Because this Public Forum is being held at a U.S. government facility, individuals planning to attend the hearing should be prepared to show valid picture identification to the security staff in order to gain access to the meeting room. The forum is an opportunity for public engagement, but since the event will not be formally recorded, it does not replace the Call for Information request in Section II or the Call for Contributing Author Nominations in Section III of this Notice; all submissions of relevant scientific information and Contributing Author nominees must be made to the USGCRP Web site as described above.

          Dated: January 28, 2014.
          Sarah Dunham,
          Director, Office of Atmospheric Programs.

      [FR Doc. 2014-02304 Filed 2-6-14; 8:45 am]
      BILLING CODE 6560-50-P