Title: To George Washington from James Anderson, 7 November 1798
From: Anderson, James
To: Washington, George

Sir
Mount Vernon 7 Novr 1798

Inclosed are the reports of last week I am just now Arranging And fixing the Stock in Winter Quarters, When I shall be able to take a correct Account And send in my next for Your information.
Nothing new since Your departure And every part of the work is carrying on in the Order You direct—The Ditchers are employed in making good the weak places of the Mill Race before they begin to the division fence in the Meadows.
The frost is very intense for this season And the drought continues

And at all the Farms we are geting in the Corn and shall embrace this faverable opportunity to have it secured.
There are no Accounts of Parkinson, nor any further Advice from Sims who engaged to let me hear of Genll Lee on His Arrival in Town, And I will pospone the forwarding of the Letter to Major Harrison untill I find what can or will be done in the purchase, Our Mill can do nothing in the Grinding of Wheat. And I am picking up some small parcels But the price advances at Dumfries 9/ to 9/6 p. Bushel It will be doing me a faver to collect account of the prices of Wheat & flour to the Northward, And the Opinion of the probable demand for flour. Docter Stewart will have his Wheat ready next Week When I will send our own Craft or hire a Schooner according to the State of the Weather. If this Settled frost continues open Crafts will do. And if it changes into thaw I must hire—It is not the exposure to wett that I am affraid of in Thaw but that Gales at this season often do happen When the Weather is changeable. All at this House are Well, And beleive me with the greatest respect to be Sir Your most Obedt Humble Sevt

Jas Anderson


Title: To George Washington from Samuel Washington, 7 November 1798
From: Washington, Samuel
To: Washington, George

Dear Uncle
Chas Town November 7th 1798

I received the Other day a Letter directed to me, from you upon opening of it, found the enclosed Letter to be for my Mother which I put safe into her hands finding from the direction it was from you, I after a good deal of persuasion got her to shew it to me, upon Reading it, found that she had wrote to you, a coppy of which she had by her, which I also prevailed with her to shew me. The contents gave me great uneasiness on many accounts particularly as her object for writing appeared in a great measure for my

benifit I say it destresses me that you should be caled on for more money by this Family after your goodness in Lending me Three hundred pound which kindness I never shall forget.
My Mother in her Letter has express’d fears on her own Account which I think never can come to pass. For this reason, That when I was Married my Father gave me all his Land & Negroes reserving to him self nothing but his house and Garden and house Servents Leaving him self and my Mother to be supported by me, it then became necessary that all his debts should revert on me Therefore all Bonds or Notes that are against the Estate are in my name, the consequence of which is that all Execusions must be Levied on my property and not on his unless my property be not sufficient, which it will take time to determine As the greater part of the debts are not yet sue’d for[.] There is about Three or Four Hundred pound due Doctr Stuart which he has not yet brought suit on, Also Six hundred pound to Capt. Hammond for my Sisters Fortune which he has my Bond for, the rest are sue’d for, (to say) £550 in the hands of Joseph Biddle of Alexandria and about Three hundred pound in small debts which distresses me more than all the rest, as there will be no way of puting them off, Those are all the debts due from the Estate, except what you were so kind as to Lend me, I should not be the Least affraid of paying all the debts and Leaving enough to support My Fathers Family and my own very well, was it not for the debts coming on me at such destresing time for money, that property that I could spare will not sell at half its Value. for double the property now will not sell for what One half will do the next year, provided we have no war with France, for People that have money will not lay it out in property at this critical time, Could I forbear Selling untill next Fall, I mean then to sell off all my Land and pay every thing that I owe and purchase Land that is Rich if it is only half as much it will be better than this that is so poor.
The Latter part of your Letter has given me more pain and uneasiness than all my present dificulties, for fear you should suspect me of applying the Money you Lent me contrary to your Wish My house I paid for with Bonds I got for my Wifes Fortune, I should not have Built a house at all had I been acquainted with the incumbrance the Estate was under at that time, though I had not a House to put my head in, I am induced to trouble you with this full statement of my Affairs in Order to shew you that it will not be

in my Mothers power to accept of the Thousands Dollars you ware so good as to offer her to do with it as you wish’d, and was it Practicable and a thing of that kind done it would compleatly ruin me, for it would give my creditors and Idea that I was more in debt than I was worth and they would all push me at Once and Consequently I would be Obliged to sell property for whatever it would bring, Whereas if they come on gradually I can have a better chance of Selling property. Was it not for about Three hundred pound that will come against me this winter I should do very well, for it will be some time before any more can come out against me, by which time I could be able to Sell some Lotts and Land joining Town on Credit which will Induce people to purchase, After my Makeing a Statement of my affairs to my Mother, as I have now done to you it was her request I would answer your Letter my being best-Acquainted with the Situation of the Estate, And to offer you her Most Sincere thanks for your kindness to her. I Am Dear sir your Affectionate Nephew

Saml Washington


Title: From George Washington to Maryland Masons, 8 November 1798
From: Washington, George
To: Maryland Masons

Gentlemen & Brothers,
[Baltimore] November 8th 1798

Your obliging and affectionate letter, together with a Copy of the constitutions of Masonary, has been put into my hands by your Grand Master; for which I pray you to accept my best thanks.
So far as I am acquainted with the principles and doctrines of Free Masonary, I conceive it to be founded in benevolence, and to be exercised only for the good of Mankind; I cannot, therefore, upon this ground, withhold my approbation of it.
While I offer my grateful acknowledgements for your congratulations on my late appointment, and for the favorable sentiments you are pleased to express of my conduct, permit me to observe, that, at this important and critical moment, when high and repeated

indignities have been offered to the Government of our Country, and when the property of our Citizens is plundered without a prospect of redress, I conceive it to be the indispensable duty of every American, let his situation and circumstances in life be what they may, to come forward in support of the Government of his choice, and to give all the aid in his power towards mantaining that Independence which we have so dearly purchased; and, under this impression, I did not hesitate to lay aside all personal considerations and accept my appointment.
I pray you to be assured that I receive with gratitude your kind wishes for my health and happiness, and reciprocate them with sincerity. I am, Gentlemen & Brothers, very respectfully your most Obedt Servt

Go: Washington


Title: To George Washington from James McHenry, 9 November 1798
From: McHenry, James
To: Washington, George

My dear General
Philad. 9th Novr 1798half past 5 O Clock P.M.

I reced about 2 o’clock P.M. Col. Lear’s letter, dated at Wilmington, and a few minutes since, his second letter, dated at Chester.
I have engaged lodgings for you at Mrs Whites, in eighth Street

near the corner of Market Street, and stabling for your horses at Dunwoody’s which is in its neighbourhood. There has been no fever in the house, and I think under all circumstances, it is the most elegible of any of those that have been suggested or that has occurred to my mind.
The President is still at Quincy[,] Hamilton is here, and General Pinckney may be expected on Monday. I got to town yesterday evening, in tolerable health.
You mention coming in by the middle Ferry. We understand by the middle Ferry the Market Street Ferry. This is the best route for several reasons. It is the widest road and avoids all the late encamptments.
General McPherson intends to bring out a few of the volunteers so as to make your reception, a little military. Will you be good enough to inform me by the messenger who delivers this as near as may be the time which he may calculate upon your arrival at the Ferry. He laments his numbers will not be equal to the occasion and his wishes owing to the late sickness. Yours affectionately

James McHenry


Title: From George Washington to Alexander Hamilton and Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, 10 November 1798
From: Washington, George
To: Hamilton, Alexander,Pinckney, Charles Cotesworth

Philadelphia 10th November 1798.

Queries—propounded by the Commander in Chief To Majors Genl Hamilton & Pinckney.
1st Is an Invasion of the United States, by France, to be apprehended whilst that Power continues at War with Great Britain?
2d In case such an Invasion should take place, what part of the United States, in their opinion, is most likely to be first attacked?
3d Is it probable that the French will, in the way of exchange, or by other means, become possessed of the Floridas or Louisiana?
4th In case of such an event, what, probably, will be the consequences, as they relate to the United States? What measures will be best to counteract them? and can those measures be carried into effect promptly, by the Commander in chief of the Armies? or, must they be previously submitted to the War Office? This question, it will be perceived, presupposes a force in existence.
5th What can be done to supply our present deficiency of Engineers? From whence, and by what means are they to be obtained? Should a Frenchman be employed at any rate?
6th Would not Riflemen, in place of Light Infantry, be eligable as a componant part of each Regiment? and in that case, would Ferguson’s Rifles claim a preference?
7th Under the idea that each grand division of the U: States is to furnish four Regiments of the augmented force; and each State, according to the Census, the population, or medium between the two, is to raise its proportion; how many places in each (its extent being considered) and where, ought to be assigned as rendezvouses during the Recruiting Service? At What place ought the general rendezvous in each State to be fixed, during the said period? And at what place, or places in the U: States, ought the augmented force to assemble? If at more than one place, how many, where, and the number at each?
8th Of how many pieces of Ordnance, of what sorts, and of what Calliber, ought the Park of artillery to consist, independently of what is attached to Brigades, or Regiments? And how many ought each of these to have?
9th Would it be advisable (after an adequate force is recruited) to

withdraw the Troops wch at present occupy the Posts on our Northern and Western Frontiers, & replace them with new raised Corps?
10th Of how many Ranks do the French form their line of Battle generally? Do they make much use of Pikes? And would it be an eligable weapon, with which to arm part of our Soldiery, as that is the Nation with which we expect to contend? Genl Pinckney may, from personal observation, be enabled to solve these two questions.
Queries—relative to smaller matters; but meriting consideration, as an army is now commencing more systematically than formerly; the rules, regulations, and distinctions in which, may give a tone to measures which may prevail hereafter.
1st If the clothing of the Regiments, and the fashion of that clothing; with distinctions between one Regiment and another are not already ordered by the proper authority, and in train of execution, what had they best be?
2d Would not cotton, or (still more so) Flannel be advisable for shirting, and linings for the Soldiery?
3d What had best be the distinctions in dress, in the badges—and other peculiarities, between the Commander in Chief and his Suit, and the Majors General & their Aids? Between the latter, & the Brigadiers & theirs? and betwn these again & the Regimental Officers? Also among the Regimental Officers themselves, Commissioned & non-commissioned? and whether the Staff (not in the line of the Army) of the different Departments—both Commissioned & Warrant Officers, ought not to be designated by their dress, or some appropriate mark, or badge? and in every case, & at all times, in the camp or Field be compelled to wear them, as well for the purpose of denoting the Corps to which they belong, as a mean by which irregularities, rioting, and improper conduct may be discovered with more ease.
4th As there has been many objections to, and remarks made upon, the black Cockade, (being that of Great Britain) might not something be devised by way of annexation thereto, to distinguish it from that of any other Nation? I have seen, and it appeared to have no bad effect, a small Eagle (of Pewter, tin, & in some instances silver) fixed by way of Button in the center of a rose cockade; which was not only very distinguishable, but somewhat characteristic.
The sooner these queries are taken into consideration and opinions given on them more agreeable will it be to

Go: Washington


Title: To George Washington from James McHenry, 10 November 1798
From: McHenry, James
To: Washington, George

Sir
War Department 10th Novr 1798

It appears by a letter from the President, dated Quincy Octbr 22d 1798, that it will not be in his power to be in Philadelphia ’till near the time fixed upon for the meeting of Congress. In order however, to prevent any injury to the public service, as it respects officering the troops, directed to be raised by the late acts of Congress, he has written to me as follows. “If you, and the generals, judge it necessary to appoint the officers of Battalions, before we can have opportunity to nominate them to the Senate, you may fill up the commissions with the blanks you have, or if you have not enough, send new ones by post.”
I have thought it proper, in pursuance of this authority, to submit to you, a list of all those persons, who have been recommended for commissions in the army, with their letters of pretensions, and also a list of all the officers of the revolutionary army; and to request that you will, with the aid of Generals Hamilton and Pinckney, prepare from these, and any other sources of information, a list of the most deserving and suitable characters, in your estimation, to fill the different grades to which the authority cited applies.
I have also, in conformity with my letter to you, dated the 16th of August ulto to request, that you would submit, to Generals Hamilton and Pinckney (General Knox having declined his appointment) the following questions and that you would be pleased to take the same into mature consideration, and report, to me, the result of your deliberations.
1. Will it be expedient and proper, to select the officers, and raise the men for the 12 Regiments of Infantry, and 6 companies

of Cavalry, from the following districts, in the following proportions, or as nearly so, as circumstances will admit. vz.
1. The officers and men, for 4 regiments of Infantry from within the States of New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
2. The officers and men, for 4 Regiments of Infantry, from within the States of New York New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware and Maryland.
3. The officers and men, for 4 regiments of Infantry from within the States of Virginia, Kentucky, N. Carolina, Tenessee, South Carolina, and Georgia.
4. The whole, or a principal part of the officers and men of the 6 companies of cavalry, from within the district, where it is most likely they will have to serve.
2. If these questions are determined in the affirmative, then, whether in making the selection of officers, the least exceptionable rule, for determining the numbers to be taken from each State, within the respective divisions aforesaid, will not be, by their relative number of inhabitants, according to the census, wherever the application of this rule, will not introduce the least worthy to the exclusion of more meritorious characters.
According to this rule, the following table will exhibit, pretty nearly, the proportion of officers and men, to be drawn from the respective States for the 12 regiments of Infantry.

Infantry
Lt Colonels
Majors

New Hampshire
396
1
1

Massachusetts
1326
2
4

Rhode Island
192

Connecticut
663
1
2

Vermont
239

1

New York
719
1
2

New Jersey
380
1
1

Pennsylvania
917
1
2

Delaware
126

1

Maryland
676
1
2

Virginia
1400
2
4

N. Carolina
630
1
2

S. Carolina
420
1
1

Georgia
140

1

Kentucky
140

Tenessee
86

Capts.
Leuts.
Ensigns

[New Hampshire]
4
4
4

[Massachusetts]
20
20
20

[Rhode Island]
3
3
3

[Connecticut]
10
10
10

[Vermont]
3
3
3

[New York]
10
10
10

[New Jersey]
6
6
6

[Pennsylvania]
13
13
13

[Delaware]
1
1
1

[Maryland]
10
10
10

[Virginia]
20
20
20

[North Carolina]
9
9
9

[South Carolina]
6
6
6

[Georgia]
2
2
2

[Kentucky]
2
2
2

[Tennessee]
1
1
4

3d Whether, in the present state of things, it is expedient and proper, to proceed immediately to the appointment of the officers, or to suspend their appointment, until the meeting of Congress.
4. Whether, in the present state of our foreign relations, it is expedient and proper, to proceed immediately after the appointment of the officers to recruit the whole of the 12 regiments of Infantry and six companies of cavalry. If inexpedient to recruit the whole, then, what part thereof will it be proper to recruit, and in which district or districts of the union.
5. Whether, if determined that a part only ought to be forthwith recruited, it will be expedient notwithstanding, to appoint the whole of the officers; and whether it ought to be signified to them, that they are not to be intitled to pay &c. previous to being called into actual service.
6. Will it be expedient and proper, to withdraw any of the troops stationed upon the North Western and Southern frontiers, vz. on the Lakes; between the Lakes and the Rivers Ohio and Missisippi⟨,⟩ and on the Tenessee and Georgia frontier bound⟨ing⟩ on the Indians and the river St Mary’s, with a view to reinforce the troops on the sea-board frontier.
7. The stations of the before mentioned troops, and their numbers, will be seen by the annexed return, and letters from Brigadier General Wilkinson. If inexpedient that any of these should be withdrawn, will it be proper to reinforce them with the two

companies, directed by a late act of Congress, to be added to each of the old regiments of Infantry.
8. What distribution, under the present aspect of affairs, ought to be made of the troops and recruits, now on our sea-board frontier; the description, places of rendezvous, stations and numbers of which is exhibited in the annexed return.
9. What number of the troops to be raised, ought to be stationed in the respective divisions aforesaid, and in what places.
10. Will it be best for the service and discipline, that the recruits should be supplied by contracts at the inlisting rendezvouses, as now practiced; or to allow to each recruit, a fixed sum per diem, in lieu of his ration, previous to his joining the general rendezvous or encampment within his division.
11. Ought the army, when in the field, to be supplied with rations, by means of purchasing and issuing commissaries, or by contract, as at present.
12. What quantity and kinds of cannon, Field Artillery, military stores, and other articles necessary to an operating army, such as may be raised, will it be proper to procure, in addition to what is exhibited, as on hand, agreeably to the annexed return, by the Superintendant of military Stores, and that may be expected to be procured in consequence of the annexed letter from the Secretary of the Treasury to  dated the .
13. Our greatest deposits of artillery and military stores, are at Springfield, Massachusetts, and Philadelphia Pennsylvania. We are besides forming magazines near Harpers Ferry, on the Potomac Virginia, and at Fayetteville N. Carolina. Ought there to be any other places established for principal magazines than these four, and the subordinate deposits mentioned in the aforesaid return.
As it will be proper in the course of your deliberations, to ascertain from the Secretary of the Treasury, whether he can furnish the monies necessary for the military service, I inclose an estimate made out some time since, shewing the monies which I thought would be required, and the periods at which it might be wanted, for the maintenance of the old and new army; and to provide certain military articles for which appropriations have been made by late acts of Congress, and for cloathing for the provisional army.
It may also be proper, that you should confer, with the Secretary of State, on the subject of our foreign relations, as well as the Secretary of the Treasury on the extent and reliance which may be

placed on our resources and finances, to assist you to mature your opinion upon some of the points submitted. I need not add, that the Secretary of State and Secretary of the Treasury, will cheerfully give you every information which you may think it necessary to request. With the greatest respect, I have the honour to be, Sir, your most obt & hble St

James McHenry


Title: From George Washington to Alexander Hamilton, 12 November 1798
From: Washington, George
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Sir,
Philadelphia Novr 12th 1798

Herewith you will be furnished with the Copy of a letter from the Secretary of War to me, suggesting many very important matters for consideration, and to be reported on.
It is my desire, that you will bestow serious and close attention on them, and be prepared to offer your opinion on each head, when called upon.
I also propose, for your consideration and opinion, a number of queries which had been noted by me, previous to the receipt of the Secretary’s letter (now enclosed). In stating these, I had endeavoured to avoid, and make them additional to, the objects which the Secretary of War, in a letter to me, dated the 16th ultimo, informed me would be subjects for my consideration. I find,

however, that several of them, in substance, are contained in his last letter. But as they were digested previous thereto, and written, I shall, to save copying, lay them before you as they are, without expunging those parts which now appear in the Secretary’s Statement. With very great esteem & regard, I am, Sir, Your most Obedt Servt

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to James McHenry, 13 November 1798
From: Washington, George
To: McHenry, James

Sir
[13 November 1798]

I observe by the concluding paragraph of your letter of the 10th instant that you contemplate conferences between the Secretaries of State and of the Treasury and myself, for the purpose of obtaining auxiliary information from their departments—Several of the questions which you state seem indeed to require such information. But on reflection, it has occurred to me as most regular, that you should settle with those officers what it may be reciprocally deemed necessary and proper for them to communicate; to the end that they may themselves bring forward, either through you or directly to me as may be agreed, but without any previous application from me, such communications as the case shall be supposed to require. Wherever, too, I am to report a formal opinion, you will I dare say think with me, that the data upon which it shall be given ought substantially to be deposited with me in writing. Personal conferences besides for more full explanation, may be useful and will be very agreeable to me. Allow me to request your speedy attention to this matter.
I find also, that the documents referred to in your letter of the 10th inst. did not accompany it. As these will be necessary in forming an opinion on several points submitted to me in your letter aforesaid, and which I have communicated to Majr Genls Hamilton & Pinckney,

I must beg you to furnish me with them without delay.
The documents referred to are as follow—viz.
“List of persons who have been recommended for Commissions in the Army, with their letters of pretensions.”
(N.B. A list of Applicants south of the River Potomac, and the⟨ir⟩ letters, are in my hands. The list & letters from the other parts will be wanting).
“Returns and Letters from Brigadier Genl Wilkinson shewing the stations and number of the Troops on the N. Western & Southern frontier.”
“Return shewing the description, places of rendezvous, stations and number of Troops, now on our Seaboard frontier.”
“Return from the Superintendant of Military Stores, shewing the quantity & kinds of Cannon, Field artillery, Military Stores, and other Articles now on hand belonging to the U.S.”
(N.B. This Return shd also exhibit the places at which t⟨hese⟩ are deposited, and the quantity at each place).
To these must be added the estimate which you had made out of the monies which you conceived wd be required for military services, and the times at which the same might be wanted.
I have in my hands a list of the Genl & Field Officers who served in the Revolutionary War, and of the Captains and subalterns from the States so. of the Potomac. You will therefore be pleased to add to the documents a list of the Captains & Subalterns, from the other States, that the whole may be before me. I am Sir with very great regard & esteem yr mo. obt ⟨Svt⟩

Go: Washington


Title: Notes on an Interview with George Logan and Robert Blackwell, 13 November 1798
From: Washington, George
To:

Tuesday—13th November 1798

Mr Lear, my Secretary, being from our lodgings on business, one of my Servants came into the room where I was writing, and informed me, that a Gentleman in the Parlour below, desired to see me; his name was sent up. In a few minutes I went down, and found the Revd Doctr Blackwell, & Doctr Logan there. I advanced towards, & gave my hand to the former; the latter did the same towards me, I was backward in giving mine. He possibly supposing from hence, that I did not recollect him, he said his name was Logan. Finally ⟨in a⟩ very cool manner, and with an air of much indiffe[re]nce, I gave him my hand, and asked Doctr Blackwell to be seated, the other took a seat at the sametime. I addressed all my conversation to Doctor Blackwell; the other all his to me, to which I only gave negative or affirmative answers, as laconically as I could, except asking how Mrs Logan did. He seemed disposed to be very polite—and while Doctr Blackwell & myself were conversing on the late calamitous fever, offered me an asylum at his house if it should return, or I thought myself in any danger in the City—& two or three Rooms by way of accomodation. I thanked him slightly, observing there wd be no call for it.
About this time, Doctr Blackwell took his leave—we all rose from our Seats and I moved a few paces towards the door of the room, expecting the other would follow, and take his leave also; instead of which, he kept his ground & proceeded to inform me more particularly (for he had mentioned it before) that he had seen Genl ⟨Lafa⟩yette at Hamburgh, and his Lady & daughters (I think in France) and related many things concerning their health &ca. He said something also respecting an Interview he had had with our Minister Mr Murray in Holland; (but as I wished to get quit of him; remained standing; and shewed the utmost inattention to what he was saying) I do not now recollect what the purport of it was; except that, he hurried from thence to Paris. His object being, he said, to get there before the departure of our Commissioners (as he called them).
He observed that, the situation of our Affairs in this Country—and the train they were in, with respect to France—had induced him to make the Voyage; in hope, or expectation or words to that

effect of contributing to their amelioration. This drew my attention more pointedly to what he was saying, and induced me to remark that, there was something very singular in this. That he who could only be viewed as a private character; unarmed with proper powers; and presumptively unknown in France; should suppose he could effect what these gentlemen of the first respectability in our Country specially charged under the authority of the Government, were unable to do. With this observation he seemed a little confounded; but recovering, said, that not more than five person’s had any knowledge of his going; that he was furnished by Mr Jefferson and Mr McKean with certificates of his Citizenship. That Mr Merlin President of the Directory of France, had discovered the greatest desire that France & America should be on the best terms. I answered, that he was more fortunate than our Envoys, for they could neither be received nor heard by Mr Merlin or the Directory. That if the Powers of France were serious in their professions, there was a plain and effectual way by which that object could be accomplished—namely—to repeal all the obnoxious arrets, by which the Commerce & Rights of this Country had been invaded; put an end to further depredations on both; and make restitution for the Injuries we had received. A conduct like this I said would speak more forcibly than words—for that the latter never made an impression on my mind, when they were contradicted by actions. He said that the Directory was apprehensive that this Country, viz. the Government of it—or our Envoys, I am not sure which he mentd or alluded to was not well disposed towards France. I asked what better evidence could be given in refutation of this opinion, than its long suffering of the outrageous conduct of that Nation towards the U. States—and dispatching three Gentlemen of unquestionable worth, with ample powers to reconcile all differences—even at the expence of great sacrafices on our parts. He replied, they have taken of[f] the embargo and were making restitution of property—ennumerating one instance I think. With respect to the embargo, I observed that taking it off or continuing it on, was a matter of no great importance if, as I had been informed, our Vessels in French Ports were few: He said that the attempt at a Coalition of European Powers against France would come to nothing; that the Directory were undr no apprehen[sion]s & that Great Britain would have to contend alone; Insinuating, as I conceived his object at the time to be, that we

should be involved in a dangerous situation if we persisted in our hostile appearances. To this I finally replied that we were driven to those measures in self defence, and asked him if the Directory looked upon us as worms; not even allowed to turn when tread upon? for it was evident to all the world that we had borne and forborne beyond what even common respect for ourselves required and I hoped the spirit of this Country would never suffer itself to be injured with impunity by any nation under the Sun. To this he sd he told Citizen Merlin that if the U.S. were Invaded by France they wd unite to a man to oppose the Invaders.


Title: From George Washington to James McHenry, 14 November 1798
From: Washington, George
To: McHenry, James

Sir,
Philada Nov. 14th 1798

In order to form an opinion on the query contained in your letter of the 10th instant, whether it will be best to furnish Rations for the Troops by Contracts, or by purchasing and issuing Commissaries, it will be necessary that I should know the prices of Rations, now paid by Contract, at the several places where Troops are sta⟨tione⟩d. You will therefore be pleased to add this to the documents which I yesterday requested you to furnish. With great esteem & regard I am Sir Your most Obedt servt

Go: Washington


Title: To George Washington from Andrew Moore and Samuel Legrand Campbell, 14 November 1798
From: Moore, Andrew,Campbell, Samuel Legrand
To: Washington, George

Sir,
Lexington Virga Novr 14th 1798

The Trustees of Washington Academy having received your letter dated 17th June have directed us to apply for a conveyance of the shares which you have been pleased to bestow on the Seminary over which they Superintend. Mr James Gold will present you with a form such as he may be advised is proper, and will take the necessary steps to have it proved and recorded.
The Trustees wish on every suitable occasion to express their high sense of the favor conferred as well as the respect they entertain for your person and character. With due consideration we are in behalf of the Board Your Mo. Obt & Much obliged Servts

Andrew Moore

S. L. Campbell


Title: To George Washington from Philip Rootes, 16 November 1798
From: Rootes, Philip
To: Washington, George

Sir
Gloucester County November 16th 1798

I was at Mountvernon Some time ago but was disappointed in seeing you. the caus of my tiakning this liberty is to beg the favour which I waited on you to ask, I will unfold the subject matter to you, my Father John Rootes made the Campaigns of 1757 and 1758 in Colo. William Byrds Regiment and was a Capt. in the said Regiment during the Campaigns—this is Certified by Colo. William Bronaugh, my Father at his death informed his family that he had a wright to some Land for his servises in the War between France and Great Brittan by some Calld the Old Indian War—his Widow and Heirs being reducd to great wand by missfortuns, and knowing the justness of the Claime has petitioned the Legislature of this state to make them some small Compensation for the servuces of the deceased as it appears from the Books of the Land office that no military Warrant has Issued to John Rootes—nor heirs—and as the records and Books whereon his Commission was recorded was desstroyed in the last War—The Heirs of the Said John Rootes will ever esteem it a Singular favour of you Sir—if you knew of any such Offerser in the War above describd you will be so good as to inclose me a few lines by the next post, to the Legislature informeing that Honorable body that there was such a person and what Commistion he had—and in what year or years he performed this Servise, A Certificate from you Sir if you know of any susch person will be one of the most necessary Vouches to support our Claim and the favour will ever be Acknowleged by Your most Obedt and most Humble Sert

Philip Rootes

N.B. please to direct yours to be left at Gloucest. Court House. P.R.


Title: To George Washington from Elizabeth Willing Powel, 17 November 1798 [letter not found]
From: Powel, Elizabeth Willing
To: Washington, George

Letter not found: from Elizabeth Willing Powel, 17 Nov. 1798. On 17 Nov. GW wrote Mrs. Powel: “I thank you for the information contained in your note of this date.”


Title: To George Washington from James McHenry, 19 November 1798
From: McHenry, James
To: Washington, George

Sir,
War Department 19th November 1798.

The enclosures, have been furnished, by the Secretary of the Treasury, in pursuance of the request, contained in my letter to him, of the 14th instant (copy of which you are possessed of) and for the purposes therein mentioned.

You are requested, if you wish for copies, of this view, of the Finances, of the United States, to cause the same to be taken, by a confidential person, and to return the Originals. I am Sir with the greatest respect your most obedient humble servant

James McHenry


Title: From George Washington to John Lambert, 20 November 1798 [letter not found]
From: Washington, George
To: Lambert, John

Letter not found: to John Lambert, 20 Nov. 1798. Lambert’s letter to GW of 24 Oct.: “Answd Nov. 20 1798.”


Title: To George Washington from Lawrence Lewis, 21 November 1798
From: Lewis, Lawrence
To: Washington, George

My dear Sir,
Mount Vernon November 21st 1798

My Aunt has communicated to me, that part of your letter to her, wherein you kindly request to be rememberd to me, and at the same time appear to be at a loss to account for my absence at the time of your departure from this—Let me assure you my dear Sir, to me it was a source of infinite regret that, indisposition that morning, was in some measure the cause of an appearance of neglect from me, and which deprived me of an opportunity of expressing my wishes for your safety, which was the sincere wish of my heart—Confind to my room, which is remote from the door which carriages drive up to, I did not hear its approach, therefore was not apprized of your departure untill some time after, nor did I expect you to have set off that morning so soon knowing it was your intention to proceed no farther than the City that day—Indisposition however should not have prevented my doing what was evidently my duty, had I not been led to believe, I should have been apprized of your setting off, by Mr Lear’s saying when he left my room he should see me again before his departure, this amidst the hurry of business I suppose he forgot—If these circumstances

combined can in any manner exculpate me from my appearance of neglect I shall be happy—and be assured my dear Sir, whenever I am intentionally neglectful, or fail in that respect so much the due of an indulgent Uncle and Aunt, I shall think a forfeiture of your friendship, and a dismission from your House (where tis my happiness to be) a punishment justly my due—I am sensible I possess too great a degree of diffidence, which often renders me awkward, and may be construed into inattention, or want of respect—But if I know my own heart, Sir, it proceeds from no such cause—How cheerfully would I devest my self of it—But time as yet has not been able to affect it, altho aided by my own exertions; but you my dear Sir must already have witnessed this defect of nature in me, and will from your indulgent disposition, make such allowances as it deserves.
The arrival of Richard Parkinson, has I imagine been announced to you ere this, after the tedious passage of eleven weeks—On board Ship there was a number of Horses, of which eight or nine died on the passage tho I believe not all, the property of Parkinson; yet he appears to be a considerable looser—I am told the property is considered by the Capt. (i.e. the Horses Cattle and Hogs[)] as yours; and have actuly been shipt as such—Parkinson in frameing this tale, no doubt had his views of interest, knowing himself unable to pay the freight, and the consequence would be a detention of his property on board untill paid for, he deceitfully determine[d] to land the property under your name, well knowing when the deceit should be discovered, the Ship could only come at the freight, but through the tedious forms of the Law—I may judge too harshly of the man, but am strengthened in my opinion of him, from what Rawlings says who has just returned from bord the Ship, and confirms what I heard, that the property was considered as yours.
The late warm weather created with us some uneasiness lest the fever shoul[d] again break out with violence, and render your situation painful and critical—but am happy to finde by the Gazettes our fears were groundless.
I believe you have been informed of my wish to have some appointment in the Army—young in the art of war, my views are by no means ambitious; to you I submit it, to place me in any situation, that in your judgment shall be best—should I be fortunate enough to obtain an appointment, I can affirm a full determination

of doing my duty, for by so doing, only, can a Officer expect to gain respect.
My health is much as it was when you left us, every now and then having a return of the ague, which prevents my gaining flesh or strength tho I am happy to informe you I am nearly restored to the perfect use of my eye. The family joins me in best wishes for your health, and safe returne—I am dear Uncle your affectionate nephew

Lawrence Lewis


Title: To George Washington from Alexander Spotswood, 24 November 1798
From: Spotswood, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Dear Sir
Newpost November 24 1798

For eight Weeks past, I have been constantly at home, engaged in Building a mill—and not Sending regularly to the post office—occasioned your favour of the 4th laying there Sometime before I got it—and a few days before I received it—I had dismissed Farril, for no other cause, than I found it impossible to Keep away his father and acquaintances from his house.
he is strictly an honest man, neat in his person, fine tempered—and of a Robust constitution—he has signed the Articles; one he keeps—the other is herewith inclosed—for makeing corn and wheat—I never had a better overseer—and I hope his Faults which I apprized you of; will be remedied by the Articles which he has signed.
on my return home, I found all my Honey locust trees cut down to three—one of which did not bear, for what cause I know not; The other two bore well—the pods are all gathered & housed, and so soon as they are Sufficiently dry, I will have them threshed and the Seed forwarded—under these trees may be got from 1000 to 1500 Sets from twelve to 18 Inches in higth—I mention this, in case you think it worth while to Send for them, that you may now

prepare your ditch for there reception in March next—which I am told is the Month they are Set in Europe.
I have cut and cured a large Stock of the bottle brush grass—and Sweeter hay I never made—by handfuls I have tried several horses, who are now fed on fine green fodder, and they all eat it heartily—and Such is my prepossession in favour of this grass, that I am determined to Sow two acrces of rich land this next fall with the Seed—and should it really answer for hay, it will be a great source of convenience to the farmer—as the time for its curing is about the last of August; when corn & wheat harvest is done with.
I take the liberty of mentioning Mr John Crump, who wishes to enter into the Standing army—he is 21 years of age—has been brought up in the Mercantile line, and I am assured by Mr Green, (the gentleman I mentioned to you in a former letter) that he is a young man, of fine moral character—and has constantly been a Strong goverment man.
Mrs Spotswood & my family desire there best regards to you Mrs Washington Miss custis & Washington as well as dr Sir yr affect. Hble St

A. Spotswood

if there is no impropriety, I could wish with your leave to assure Mr Green of his appointment as a captain that he may have a little Notice to close his mercantile transactions—whenever you see this gentleman—I am Sure he will attract yr Notice.


Title: To George Washington from John Gerard William De Brahm, 26 November 1798
From: Brahm, John William Gerar de
To: Washington, George

Respected Friend
26d XI mo. 1798

I feel a deep concern to revere, yea Love Eminent Men, who under the discipline of divine Goodness can be most Virtuously instrumental, what they cannot be in their own exertion for the good of Men, whom God does all the good they hinder him not, a drop of their blood is too precious in his Sight as to aprove of its Spilling, he preserves Men in most tender Love.
finding, that the Seed of the fever like embers under the Ashes conceiles in Some buildings and furnitures.

I under discipline of divine mercy made willing to do all good I can, hurry to Supplye the[e] with a Souvereign preservative, from which (tho by mercy kept from common complaints free) yet in my twelfth climacteric created Such infirmities, which are passd remedy, receive comfort from what I inclose in two Vials. I pray God to preserve and bless thee am Respectfully

J: G: W: de Brahm


Title: To George Washington from James McHenry, 29 November 1798
From: McHenry, James
To: Washington, George

Sir
War Department Novr 29th 1798

The enclosed papers contain the proceedings of two Military Courts, lately held at the city of Trenton, state of New Jersey, pursuant to warrants from the Secretary of War.
The dispersed state of the troops in our western country rendered it difficult to collect a sufficient number of officers at any of the posts to compose a General Court Martial and impossible to do so without injury to the service, it therefore, appeared proper when Captain Lewis was arrested in the city of Philadelphia to issue a warrant for convening a Court at the same place to investigate, try and determine upon the charge exhibited against him. Other inducements to this measure were that the cause of arrest originated at Philadelphia, the party and prosecutor were both on the spot, as it was probable, were also the witnesses to prove any facts that might be denied, and these not military persons: and it was known that officers sufficient to form the court were present, or in the vicinity. A Warrant accordingly issued from the War office

on the 24th of July last for constituting a general court Martial consisting of five, the smallest number of Members allowed by the articles of War, to meet at the city of Philadelphia to try and determine upon the charge and specifications thereof, exhibitted against Captain Lewis, as well as such others as might be, in proper times, specified and produced to the court, and such sentence pass on the premises, as by the rules and articles of War shall be authorised.
Agreeably to the Warrant, the court met, and proceeded in the trial. Captain Mitchel however one of the members of the court, became indisposed and afterwards died, which reducing the number of members below five the lowest number allowed to constitute a general court Martial, the court was considered as dissolved.
There being no result from the former trial, the same reasons caused it to be thought proper to issue a second Warrant from the War office on the first day of October last constituting a general court martial, de novo, for the trial of Captain Thomas Lewis, to consist of a full court of thirteen members, if so many could be collected at the city of Trenton, New Jersey, and such sentence pass as may be authorized by the rules and articles of War.
Of this court nine members, including the President, convened at Trenton on the 20th of October ultimo; the other members, from various causes could, or did not attend. The Prisoner challenged one, and in his place Lieutenant Massey who had just arrived from Michilimakinac was substituted.
The court sat from the 20th to the 30th of October inclusive and on the latter day passed sentence of acquittal.
This case is submitted respectfully to you Sir, with a view to obtain the opinion of yourself and also of Major Generals Hamilton and Pinckney whether under all circumstances, the President can consistent with that due subordination which is necessary in all armies, and which the practice of challenging superior officers, for any cause, may have a tendency to interrupt and destroy, give, to the sentence of the court the sanction of his unqualified approval? If the opinion be in the negative, then, whether it would not be attended with beneficial consequences that the Presidential sanction be qualified with a reprimand of Captain Lewis, and a denunciation of the practice of Duelling, particularly of challenging superior officers.
It ought to be stated that Captain Lewis was at the time of the

transaction which occasioned the charge against him, on furlough, and that Major Cushing was also not on actual duty. Also, that the charge is grounded on, and is in the precise words of the 20th article of the appendix, and not on the 2nd article of the 7th section of the rules and articles of War relative to challenges.
The other proceedings are those of a court of Inquiry, which met at the city of Trenton on the 18th of October ulto to examine, inquire and report ⟨illegible⟩mg certain allegations against Edward Miller Captain in the second regiment of Infantry in the service of the United States, and continued, by adjournment, to the 26th of the same month, inclusive.
Captain Miller was, during the revolutionary wars, a meritorious serjeant, and at its conclusion Serjeant Major of the third Connecticut regiment, and as such, he was entitled to and has drawn the continental bounty in land. In 1791 he was commissioned as an Ensign, and has since risen by grades at promotion, to the rank he now holds. He is understood uniformly, to have conducted himself as a brave and vigilant officer in the field, and to have been always ready for any duty however hazardous, and frequently employed on such—to have behaved well in the unfortunate affair under General St Clair, and also in the successful action with the Indians under General Wayne. He had been ordered to recruit his company and when he had nearly completed this service he was ordered with his men from Middle town, Connecticut, to Philadelphia.
A settlement of his accounts, for the recruiting service, being necessary, a previous muster of the recruits was directed, when several of the men were mustered out. and the accountant of this Department by letter to the Secretary of War dated the 3rd of July last reported alligations of irregularities in the conduct of Captain Miller, and referred to him to determine whether the bounty paid, and charged by Captain Miller to recruits, now reported to have been unfit for service at the time of inlistment, should not be deducted from his account. The settlement of Captain Miller’s accounts was suspended, his pay has been withheld from [him], and the pressure of the necessities of a large family consisting of a wife and eight or nine children becoming distressing he, by letter to the Secretary, dated Trenton September the 11th last requested that a court of inquiry might be ordered, to examine into his conduct.

A warrant issued from the War Office, on the 16 day of October last, authorizing and especially requiring the court of Inquiry, strictly to examine into the allegations contained in the letter from the accountant, dated the 3rd of July last, and to report a State of all the circumstances, and evidence which should appear to them, together with their opinion thereon. The court have not reported these opinions so fully as was expected. It was expected that they would have examined the conduct of Captain Miller on the principle of Honor, and if, notwithstanding some irregularities, Captain Miller, as an officer, and an associate for themselves, could have been excused on the score of misapprehension, inadvertence, or otherwise; and the public indemnified by a competent retribution, on his part, that they should have so reported.
Your opinion, Sir, with that of the Major Generals is likewise requested, whether, consistent with the regularity, œconomy and strict obedience, to orders and inscriptions, indispensable to the service, Captain Miller can, under all circumstances, be continued in the service, upon his remunerating the public, out of his pay, for the losses sustained by his conduct? Whether it will be more proper to revoke his commission, or to order a general court Martial to decide finally on his case. I have the honor to be with very great respect Sir, your most Obd. Hb. st

James McHenry


Title: Editorial Note
From:
To:

   Editorial Note
   George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and Charles Cotesworth Pinckney spent six weeks in Philadelphia in November and December 1798, formulating their recommendations to the president for raising and incorporating the twelve additional regiments for which Congress had provided in July 1798 in the “Act to augment the Army of the United States, and for other purposes.” Although there were many other issues relative to recruiting, equipment, and distribution of the army facing GW and his two major generals, the evaluation and recommendation of candidates for the officer corps from the various states proved perhaps the most time-consuming. Secretary of War James McHenry furnished them with lists of the men who had applied for commissions, along with any letters of recommendation. GW, for his part, brought with him lists of candidates from Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Kentucky, and Tennessee, as well as pertinent letters.
   In a series of meetings beginning as early as 13 Nov., GW, Hamilton, and Pinckney reviewed these lists and letters of application and recommendation. They made lists of the candidates in each state for the various ranks in the New Army and annotated the lists with comments on the qualifications of the individual candidates. Their lists of candidates in eleven of the states have been published in Syrett, Hamilton Papers,Harold C. Syrett et al., eds. The Papers of Alexander Hamilton. 27 vols. New York, 1961–87. 22:89–146, 270–312, 320–39. The list for Virginia, which was not included in the Hamilton Papers, is printed here. GW’s acquaintance with or knowledge of many of the applicants from Virginia makes it probable that he was the source for many of the remarks on the candidates recorded in the Virginia list.
   The list of Virginians recommended for commissions in its original form is nineteen pages long, and it is arranged roughly in columns. The first column lists the names of candidates, usually numbered on the basis of a list of applicants. Notations as to age and county of residence often appear underneath the names. The second column contains short summaries of the letters of recommendation, when they existed, for each candidate. Commentaries by GW and others on the character and potential service of the men often appear in the second column but at times are appended to the first column or placed in a third column. Marginal notations appear frequently throughout the list. Most of the document is in Pinckney’s hand, though some entries and many annotations, particularly

   those relating to the opinions of Edward Carrington and William Heth, were written by Hamilton.
   Upon concluding their deliberations on 13 Dec., the generals submitted to McHenry their recommendations for appointment of officers in all of the states except Connecticut, the Carolinas, and Georgia. On the president’s instructions, McHenry sent copies of the lists of nominees to other members of the cabinet for their perusal. McHenry deleted from the lists the names of those who did “not deserve to be appointed,” as well as the names of others who declined their nominations. McHenry then submitted the revised lists to Adams on 29 Dec., who in turn placed them before the Senate on 31 December. After learning of the Senate’s actions on the nominations, McHenry wrote to GW on 22 Jan. enclosing a list of those whom the Senate had rejected. The process of notifying and securing acceptances from nominees for commissions lasted through the spring of 1799, during which time GW and McHenry corresponded about problems that arose. On 21 May McHenry sent GW a final revised list of appointees from Virginia.


Title: Candidates for Army Appointments from Virginia, November 1798
From: Washington, George,Hamilton, Alexander,Pinckney, Charles Cotesworth
To:

        Candidates for Army Appointments from Virginia

           [Philadelphia, November 1798]

      x A John Cropper +
      These old officers order of merit by Heth & Carrin[gton]

      x B Jonathan Clark +

      x C Robert Porterfield +

      x D Joseph Swearingen +

      x E David Stephenson +

      x f John Blackwell +

      g Wm Bentley

      h Otway Bird

      John Heth (now in service) Carrington thinks him worth considering for Majority

      1. A. Gibson mentioned for Majority now in service distinguished at Fort Recovery

      2. Laurence Butler Major

      Virginia

      Lt Colonels

      No. 3 William Watkins
      Letter ill written

      Halifax
      no recommendation

      officer last War

      4. John M. WillisFredericksburgh officer last War Oldest Major in Virginia line
      unquestionable bravery & great popularity but a great Gambler & weighs 4 or 500 lb. Good for nothing C. & H.

      14. James MaxwellBerkely County officer last War
      Morgan active officer in the Militia understands tactics Attention offers himself for immediate service

      22. Thomas Finn
      Mr Evans says served in the Artillery during last War as Captn Lieutt with Coll Carrington to whom he says his worth is well known. Desirous of joining the service of his Country against any Nation who wishes to go to War with us. Of great bravery Quare politics?

      24. Thomas Mathewes
      wishes to be Inspector General—will not serve under his present rank viz. Brigr Genl.

      26. Thomas Parker of Frederick 37 Years old recommended very strongly by Genl Marshall very strong recommendations from others. Expects a regiment
      5th on the list of Majors Carrington & Heath. as good an officer as any of his rank last War—recommended by Josiah Parker. Genl Morgan from 80 to 120 speaks very highly of him—uniformly federal—Genl Lee says he knows no man who would make a better Colonel of a regiment—respectable connections—property—⟨H.⟩ Marshall recommends him—Walter Jones also—Atty Genl recommends him for a regiment.

      Majors

      1. Richard B. Lee Presly ThorntonNorthumberland
      provisional army Native American formerly in British service but refused to come to America—a man of great worth & probably well qualified

      50. Richard BlackburnePrince William
      now Capt. of Artillery desirous of transfer to Infantry as Major not otherwiseB. Washington strongly recom.

      15. Nathaniel Henry Shepherds Town Berkely officer in N.Y. line to nearly end of the War
      Swearingen speaks well Ed. O. Williams—highly Morgan—served with reputation last war thinks him judicious—sober J. Maxwell—strict Disciplinarian pretty respectabl. not worthy

      129. Thomas Tinsley Hanover Now Col. of Militia
      Evans desires command of Regiment good information respectable character & friend to Govt

      93. James Baytop Gloucester officer Last War—Captn
      Evans man of good information & respectability—middle aged—wishes in the immediate army but will accept in the Provisional. 6th on the list of Majors Carrington & Heth

      119. Samuel Marsh of Norfolk serves for the Provisional Army
      Evans—native of Connecticut bred to law Brigade Inspector so far as observation goes—decent Gentlemanlike & prudent—disciplinarian recommended by Coll Parker & officers of Brigade.

      ⟨illegible⟩ Thomas Finn ⟨illegible⟩ last War
      Evans—barely mentions ⟨other Letter⟩ man of great bravery see T. Finn on other side

      20. Samuel Tinsley
      Evans—was a captain of Infantry wishes to be Major of Artillery

      151. [Benjamin] GravesNorfolk
      recommended by Josiah Parker for a Majority in provisional army—good character—Cap⟨tn⟩ of State Troops last War—Quare Politics

      35. John Baylor ArmsteadLoudoun County
      will not accept of an appointment inferior to a Majority in Infantry or Captcy in Cavalry—on the western expedition was aid to Genl Morgan—active, & respectably connected—recommended by genl Marshall—R. B. Lee—Leven Powell—Captn Parker—wishes to serve in the regt which may be given to Thomas Parker—Friend to the measures of Government—very repectable.

      51. Wm Bentley Powetan mentioned by Carrington & Heath as 7th in merit for Lt Col.
      recommended strongly by Govr Wood—served 7 years as Captn in the revolutionary War. his regt of Militia well disciplined—a friend of order & the Constitution of U.S. certainly Major perhaps Colonel

      55. Wm Munroe
      Genl Morgan says he served the whole of the War, not with him, but is highly spoken of.

      59. Thos RichardsonHanover
      Nothing worse C. & H.

      62. John Tayloe
      Served as Captn of Calvary in the western Expedition—large fortune federal, amiable; very respectable as Major—wishes the Cavalry.

      65. Otway Bird
      wishes Brigade or regt if consistant with holding his civil office. Carrington & Heth 8th in scale of merit

      74. Roger WestFairfax County
      Coll Fitzgerald—Mr Ludlow Lee—Man of Fortune—Father of a Family—Major of Militia—Coll Sims differed from him in political sentiments, but recommends him—Unblemished Character—strong Military ardour. Wishes to command a regiment in the provisional army—Mr Lee the Atty Genl says he is in prime of Life & well qualified to command a Regt

      Field Officers

      125. Wm Campbell Orange County 4th on the list of Majors Carrington & Heth.
      wishes to be Lieutt Coll Served 6 years during the War—recommended by Genl Stevens. Was on the Western Expedition—federal—Middle aged—recommended by Genl Lee as Field Officer.

      97. John StithBrunswick
      Brave active & meritorious Officer—was Captn last War recommended by Govr Wood—federal—A field Officer—appointment in provisional army

      117. Hugh Holmes Winchester
      Will not accept lower than a Majority recommended by the Atty Genl for that commission. opposed to some of the measures of Government C. & H.

      99. Robert Beale Maddison County Third on list of Majors
      Served from 1776 to the end of the War—served as Captn expects Majority recommended by Genl Morgan, & Genl Marshall—not very strongly.

      Carrington & Heth

      83. Churchill Jones
      recommended by Genl White

      84. John WattsBedford County
      recommended by Genl White—Heth & Carrington well intitled to first rank in Virgina Quota of cavalry if not in U. States—C. & H.

      162. Thomas Buckner
      No testimonials.

      159. Daniel Broad-head
      Taken Prisoner at fort Washington—served in Pennsylvania line—Man of honour—intellig⟨ent—⟩active—hopes for a Majority at least—Does not appear to have served after his captivity—respectable

      85. Larking Smith
      recommended by Genl White decided enemy of the Govermt C. & H.

      133. Joseph Forman
      Friend to the Government—recommended by Mr Fitzhugh—Quare is he of Virginia?

      181. Thomas Hoard Caroline County 10th on list captains Carrington & Heth backward
      recommended by Generals Lee & Spotswood distinguished himself last War—in prime of life—excellent citizen & warmly attached to his Government.

      158. Simon MorganFauquierCaptain
      adjutant General of Virginia—officer in the last war—cool & intrepid—rallied his regt when a subaltern at German Town—shot through the body bravely fighting at Eutaw recommended by Genl Marshall.

      175. Elias ParkerPetersburghLieutenant
      served in the artillery & Infantry with fair reputation in the last war—in the Massachusetts line—Certificate from Genl Knox.

      Capts.

      Presly ThorntonJohn Stith

      2. William K. Blue Berkly County Lt of Western Army Resigned
      desires a Commission wishes to command a batalion Bu[shro]d Washington—excellent heart and as he is informed was a good officer

      D. Holms—from his general character is qualified Thinks himself intitled to a Majority will accept an old Captaincy. Inquire

      see Lieutenants
      D. Holms—desirous of a Commissin

      13. Daniel Ball Manchester Lt last War
      Carrington recommends good officer & good citizen Marshall—thinks favourably of him 5th on the list of Lieutenants Carrington & Heth Respectable

      16. George Tate BerkleyShepherdstown
      Swearingen J. Maxwell Speaks well—Genl Morgan writes strongly in his favour—3

      17. Josiah Thornburgh Berkeley—do
      Morgan speaks well of him—now capt. of Militia—has instructed himself in tactics Maxwell—well—well enough

      18. James Maxwell Berkley
      Col. Maxwell speaks favourably of him [Not much]

      Martinsburgh

      19. Robert Gustin Bath Berkeley
      Morgan Foederalist & man of good character Not much

      21. Samuel J. Winston Hanover
      Capt. or Lieutenancy Col. Tinsley recommends & evans supports young Gentleman much respected & of good principles

      23. John Hardiman
      Evans barely mentions officer during last War—acted as Major—Mr King says valuable Quare.

      25. Asa Bacon of Leesburgh
      a Man of science—persecuted for federalism. native of Connecticutt—unites science, sense integrity spirit & patriotism according to the Letters of Nathan Smith & John Allen. In the Connecticut List—Captain.

      27. John Stewart Richmond
      wishes a Captaincy of Cavalry—no recommendations. Good for nothing C. & H.

      29. William ArmsteadPrince William
      Desires a Captaincy of Cavalry—no vouchers—doubt his politics C. & H.

      30. Charles ShacklefordCulpepper
      a young man pretty well recommended perhaps a Lieutenant.

      32. Robert Gregg Culpepper
      a Captain in the Pennsylvania Line in the Revolutionary War. Ten years residence in Virginia will serve as Captn in Cavalry or Major in Infantry—recommended by Coll Jameison & Genl Stevens—worth & respectability.

      36. John Davidson Richmond First on the list of Capts. Carrington & Heth qualified for any promotion.
      native of Pennsylvania—recommended by Mr Hopkins as one who will be an ornament to the army & fine supporter of his Countrys rights & a friend to its government—30 years old—active & strong. respectable.

      50. Philip Lightfoot Culpepper
      Lived 10 years with Coll Jameison strict honour & may be confided in—Friend to Government. recommended by Genl Marshall & Posey & Major Day & Coll Stevens & Jameison very strong

      96. James DuncansonCulpepper
      very respectably as Lt Jameison Stephens, Posey

      43. Charles Fenton Mercer 22 years old Fredericksburgh
      a young Gentleman—recommended by Dr Smith of Princeton as a young Gentleman of Talent, probity industry, & good Politics—Also by Genl Lee—very respectable, Captain or Lieutenant

      44. John Reynolds Norfolk formerly of Connecticut
      Stability & good morals—commands a Militia Company—federal—expects further recommendations. good for nothing C. & H.

      45. Daniel C. Lane Loudoun County 25 years of age
      Thinks he can easily raise a Company Captn of Grenadiers in the Regt—recommended by Mr R. B. Lee & Dr Stewart—active & of sound political sentiments—happy to see such men com.

      48. David Shields Rockbridge County Dudley Odlin Alexandria
      Mr Holmes recommends him as Captn Antifoederal formerly of Exeter in Connecticut—will not do here.

      56. Samuel Turner
      Nothing strong.

      64. Bathurst Jones Hanover
      Doubtful

      66. Wm Glassoll
      good for nothing C. & H. Federal—brave but intemperate—said to be reforming. exclusively provisional army

      68. Robert Young Alexandr.
      Fitzgeral[d]SimmsCraig

      Young Gentleman desirous of serving his Country from zeal & activity can raise troops will do honor to his Country wishes to be Major or 1st Captn in the provisional army

      69. George Hite Berkeley Lt last War in dragoons wounded MGill—Genl Lee Theo Lee very strong
      till lately violent antifederalist now very different Wm Heath—very brave & deserving of a Troop or Company—noble minded—& of different politics from Rutherford. Holmes—valuable Citizen military merit R. Page—possessed eminently of military qualities

      Thurston excellent officer and a Gentleman. ⟨M. Guine⟩—his military talents entitle him to a Majority

      Ths Parker—peculiar merit—respectable family Gentleman

      Genl Marshall

      73. Archibald Randolph About 26 years old
      Strongly recommended by Mr B. Washington—Captn of Cavalry. perhaps Lieutt—was aid to Genl Morgan on the Western Expeditn

      76. Lemuel Bent lived 8 years in Virginia Alexandria born in Massachusetts
      —Coll Fitzgerald—Mr Ames recommend him—Captn of Militia. Perhaps Lieutenant

      87. Henry PercyAlexandria
      lived 6 years in Virginia—acquainted with maneuvring a company—served through the revolutionary War—federal—Coll Sims says a valuable officer—Good Captain.

      81. Garnett PeytonStafford Country
      federal—good military genius—strong Wishes Captn in the Cavalry—or 1st Leutt in do or Captn in Infantry—Courageous, Sober discreet, stout popular generally beloved—warmly recommended by genl Lee.

      86. Richard Hill good for nothing C. & H.
      Served in Harrisons Artillery—wishes a Capcy in Artillery—no recommendation among his Papers.

      91. Wm Campbell son of Coll Arthur Campbell Washington
      Desires a Captaincy—Member of the Legislature of Virginia—His conduct that of a gentleman—federal.

      98. Booker PegramDinwiddie County
      recommended to Govr Wood by persons he can depend upon—Quare Family Antifœderal his own politics unknown otherwise worthy of notice C. & H.

      116. John Koontz
      not recommended

      100. James Ware
      recommended as a man of good Character not been in service—Quare politics?

      105. Edmund Taylor
      Served in the Western Army—expects Majority but will serve as Captn recommended by Genls Morgan & Marshall & Captn Parker

      101. Patrick DaughertyFrederick County 12th on the list of Carrington & Heth
      Captn Parker says he is an amiable Character & could soon raise his men—not been in service.

      126. Francis FoucheeNorthumberland County
      wishes not to except any thing inferior to a Captain. amiable—active mind & stout body—according to Genl Lee—refers to testimonials not before us said to be in secretary of Wars office—Inquire.

      127. John DowdallWinchester
      very little said of him.

      74. Francis ThorntonNear Fredericksburgh
      recommended by Genls Lee, Spotswood & many others warmly for the Provisional Army as Captain—Connections very respectable & of ample fortune. federal principles.

      180. John Greene
      Warmly recommended for Captn by Genl Lee, Spotswood & others—strongly federal—a very fine young fellow.

      143. Richard Chinn Loudohn County
      respectable—Captain Thos Parker warmly recommends him. If he can get a Capcy his company will enlist.

      145. Jesse Sims
      Serjeant last War—Hurt if not made Captn—No.

      149. Thomas WilsonMecklenburgh County
      wishes Captaincy in the provisional army—The Marshall of Virginia recommends him strongly.

      153. Laurence WashingtonKing George
      recommended by Genl Lee Captn perhaps Lieutt in Cavalry.

      156. Beverley RobertsonKing Wm County
      federal—sober & esteemed recommended by Genl Young.

      159. James Caldwell 28 years old Ohio County
      respectable—federal.

      163. Isaac Andrews
      no testimonials

      164. John RoseAmherst County
      Young Gentleman—good Character & family—recommended by Mr Ludwell Lee Quare politics.

      165. Gustavus B. Wallace
      recommended by Brigr Genl Washington Educated at Princeton—good character well looking—cannot find any Letters concerning him.

      170. Robert King Hanover
      active, intelligent spirited recommended by Genl Marshall.

      172. Wm C. Carter Albemarle or Amherst
      respectable & well recommended—perhaps provisional

      173. Laurence Lewis 30 years of age Frederick County
      very respectable—aid to Genl Morgan Captn of Cavalry.

      176. Thomas Turner King George 25 years old
      unblemished reputation—ardent patriotism—federal—strict honour—popular strongly recommended—Captn of Cavalry perhaps—if not, wishes majority in Infantry voted with the Democratic assembly last time now supported by Federal party, General C. & H.

      182. Martin Tapscott Stafford Edmund Clark Spotsylvania
      Friend to Government—good man recommended as Captn by Genl Lee. Eleventh on the list of Carrington & Heth

      168. Robert Gregg Culpepper officer last War Capt.
      Colo. Jameison—brave Officer & worthy independent Citizen—willi[n]g to take Capt. of Caval[r]y or Major of Regt

      Lieutenants

      5. James JamesP. William County
      Atty G.—gentleman of good character & behaviour army or navy Inquire

      6. Gerard Roberts York Town probably private or N. C. officer officer in West Expedition
      Lee—agrees with Marshall Marshall Evans. His own letter very well. Attenti⟨on⟩ as Ensign

      7. William Bouyer
      }
      Alfred Moore not much
      Boyer & Brown well known to him active young men & doubts not will be found qualified

      Green Briar

      8. John G. Brown✻
      ✻son of Col S. Brown

      Augusta

      9. Jams Brown
      Brown recommended by Mr Harper & Genl Blackburne

      Green Briar

      10. Michael Flinn
      The others knows only from information.

      Green Briar

      J. ⟨Skiles⟩ Tinsleygood man
      ✻young man of good behaviour Browne of respectable connections and good character can recruit good men Qr. Browne stand pretty well as Lt or Ensign

      11. William PottsPetersburgh
      Lt in provisional army will accept ensigncy Letter pretty well No recommendation 5th Ensign on list of Carrington & Heth

      152. Brewer Goodwin Junr Isle of Wight
      respectable connections attached to the Government perhaps Lieutenant recommended by Josiah Parker.

      28. Robert Brook King Wm County resident of Philadelphia
      worth & amiable Character Govr Wood recommends him as Lieutt of Cavalry—good understanding, spirit activity & attachment to his Country recommended by Genl Marshall Mr Burrell, Mr Griffin very respectable

      31. Charles Tutt Culpepper
      young Gentleman—an only Son—applies with cons[en]t of his Father respectable connexions—fair reputation recommended by genls Marshall Lee Stevens Posey & Coll Jameison—& Mr Williams. Attached to Government—well recommended—a Lieutenancy in Cavalry or Infantry.

      49. Thomas JameisonCulpepper
      a first Lieutt in State artillery now—respectable family—recommended by genl Stevens.

      33. James Tutt JunrCulpepper
      wishes Lieutcy in Cavalry—a young man of respectable connections—tolerably recommended

      34. Wm D. Clopton New Kent County
      recommended by his Uncle—18 years of age. Badly recommended C. & H.

      37. Robert CarringtonRichmond
      a near relation of Coll Carrington wishes to be appointed Lieutenant of Davidsons Company should he get one. Young active about 25—respectably recommended by Mr Hopkins first on the list of Carrington & Heth 26 years old Mr Carrington thinks he would not wish an appointment but in provisional army. his health dellicate

      46. Horatio Gates Whiting Richmond between 20 & 21
      respectable connections—promising appearance—perhaps Ensign bad politics C. & H.

      47. Andrew Moore Lusk Fredericksburgh—at present formerly Lexington
      recommended by Genl Posey as Lieutt or Ensign—Nephew to Mr Moore late Member of Congress—perhaps Ensign.

      72. Reuben Thornton 19 years old Hugh McAllister Rockbridge County Mr A. Smith Mooresfield
      Son in Law to Genl Posey—Desires Lieutenancy or Cornetcy in the Horse—perhaps Cornet. Mr Holmes recommends him for a Lieutenancy—not strong. Mr Holmes recommends him for Ensign. not strong.

      49. Mr John Seayres
      His Father fell at German Town—was Colonel—Quare other recommendations—Horrible authority for him C. & H.

      52. John C. Williams In Prince William
      respectable family—& much esteemd Perhaps Ensign—recommended by Genl Stevens—Mr Jameison & Mr Brent & many others—Quare political sentiments & whether John Williams & John C. Williams are the same person—NO

      57. Simon Owens
      recommended strongly by Genl Morgan as Lieutt to Tate.

      58. Robert Temple King Wm Recommended by A. New who is bad authority C. & H.
      a young man—recommended by Hopkins active sober discreet & Enterprizing—Friend to the Government. recom: by N. Burrell W. F. Gains—Son of an old officer—very respectable—Lieutenant.

      60. Thos Davis Albemarle
      weak

      61. John Bacon
      weak

      New Kent
      recommended by John Clopton who is bad authority C. & H.

      63. Wm Knight

      67. Obadiah Clifford
      Tolerably respectable—perhaps Lieutenant.

      Alexandria

            112. William Brent
            }
            Kinkead speaks well in general terms Gl Lee—youth of merit
            Nothing very positive perhaps Ensigns.

            113. Thomas Brent

      70. Charles J. Love Loudohn County 24 years old
      strong healthy good disposition, good character—Mr Charles Lee recommends him as Lieutt—pretty well perhaps Lieutenant

      75. Charles Loftland Rockingham County
      so-so.

      77. B. Dandridge Armstead New Kent
      Cold recommendation—prefers civil appointment—Mr Clopton recommends him strongly—Not much.

      78. Charles Lane 22 years old Loudohn County
      recommended by R. B. Lee—not very strongly.

      79. John Thornton Fitzhugh 19 years old
      free from vice—desirous to enter the Army.

      80. John Williams
      Strong.

      82. Alexr Henderson 21 years old Dumfries
      Sprightly active young man, federal—good Ensign.

      88. Thomas Blackburn21 years old
      Mr Stoddart recommends him—won’t do.

      96. James DuncansonCulpepper
      very respectable as Lieutenant. See Captains

      106. Mathew Arbuckle
      young—sedate & manly—Inquire.

      107. L. ⟨Tremper⟩
      offers service—not recommended.

      109. Richard GrahamDumfries
      recommended by the Atty Genl as Ensign in the ⟨Marine⟩ service.

      110. Carter B. FontainePrince William
      man of family—wishes to serve in the Cavalry as Lieutt. about 21 years of age—respectably recommended—perhaps Cornet.

      114. Turner RichardsonRichmond
      recommended by Govr Wood—will not accept lower than Lieutt—Tolerable. Good for nothing C. & H.

      115. Wm Finny
      no recommendation Good for nothing C. & H.

      118. John Campbell Frederick
      Father died fighting at Eutaw—respectable for Lieutt.

      120. Horatio Stark Frederick
      Genl Marshall says he is recommended by respectable persons—but the recommendations do not appear.

               102. John BrahamFrederick
               young man of excellent character & could soon raise his men
               recommended by MajorParkerasLieutenants

               103. Addison ArmsteadLoudohn County
               do

               Thomas OpieNorthumberland
               [do]

      104. Frederick Thurston Frederick County
      recommended by Majr Parker from Genl Morgan as Ensign—was Serjeant in Western Expedition & in several actions.

               121. Calvin MorganStaunton25 yrs old
               }
               recommended by Mr Harper as Ensigns their families federal—sober & honest Morgan’s recommendation well supported by many others, & recommending him for Lieutt.

               128. Jesse Dold
               Morgan’s, very respectable—Dold’s, good.

      123. Joseph Grigsby 28 yrs old
      sober—served as Sheriff & Magistrate Quare politics

      124. Charles McAllister22 years old
      sober—Quare politics

      128. Jesse Dold
      recommended by Mr Andw Moore—David Stevenson & Mr Harper—steady, sober, & respectable connexions—Coll Potterfield speaks handsomely of him—well recommended as Ensign—Brother an Officer killed in Wayne’s Expedition of great Character.

      130. Charles Winter Smith Martinsburgh Berkley County Referred to
      wishes employment as an Engineer, artillerist or Physician to the Army—Draughtsman to Bourgoyne—Teacher to the officers at Montreal—Inquire

      131. George WashingtonHumphries
      Genteel Young Man perhaps Ensign Quare.

      132. John A. Steward of Belfast has been Six years in this Country. of Alexandria
      recommended by John Taylor & Jesse Steward not strong.

      136. Wm G. Hunter
      In Captn Tinsleys Company in Georgia not strong.

      John Muse
      ⟨navy⟩

      138. Tunspall Banks
      recommends himself

      Francis Thornton for Captains
      recommended by Genl Lee as Captn for Provisional Army—& Genl Spotswood—well connected & of ample fortune.

      ⟨1⟩39. John Moore
      No testimonials but his own Letter produced.

      140. John Strother Culpepper
      nothing about politics or abilities mentioned.

      141. Wm Deane Bath County about 22 years old
      respectable connections—tolerable perhaps Ensign.

      142. Jesse Ewell Junr about 22 Dumfries
      federal—very respectable—Ensign perhaps Lieutenant.

      Richard Chinn
      see Capns

      143. John Craine JunrLoudohn County
      respectable—perhaps Ensign.

      144. Samuel CassonCaroline County
      Wishes to be Midshipman.

      148. John WinterberryFairfax
      tolerable—perhaps Ensign.

      150. John SandersPrince William
      Recommended to Genl Lee—who does not know him—Quare

      Henry Tapscott
      recommended by Genl Lee as well fitted for the business of War—at present a Capt. in the Militia.

      157. Benjn TempleKing Wm County
      federal, sober & esteemed recommended by Genl Young.

      160. Van BennettBerkley County
      federal—pretty well for Ensign.

      166. George ArmsteadLoudohn County
      respectable connections & character.

      167. Thomas BagotFredericksburgh
      served 18 Months in the Army recommended by Thos Parker.

      Thomas Blackburn
      Marine.

      174. Peter Lamkin
      recommended by Captn Blackburne Ensign perhaps.

      183. Rowan Stafford
      Good Landed Estate—federal—qualities of a Soldier recommended by Genl Lee for Cornett

      184. H. L. SeayresRichmond
      wishes to be Lieutt of arsenal to be established at Richmond, or some respectable station in the Army—Father fell at German-town—no Letter but his own.

      187. Strother Settle 40
      strongly recommended by General Morgan. Searjeant & in last war made Officer & served to end of war as Ensign


Title: From George Washington to Elizabeth Willing Powel, 1 December 1798
From: Washington, George
To: Powel, Elizabeth Willing

Saturday—1st December 1798.

General Washington presents his best wishes, and affectionate compliments to Mrs Powell.
If Mrs Powell is not otherwise engaged, G.W. will have the pleasure of breakfasting with her tomorrow, at her usual hour, if named to him.


Title: To George Washington from Elizabeth Willing Powel, 3 December 1798
From: Powel, Elizabeth Willing
To: Washington, George

My dear Sir
Market Street [Philadelphia] Decemr 3d 1798

I have the Pleasure to send the Book of Prints that you were so obliging as to accept from your Friend. I have also taken the liberty to add a few that I admire on a presumption that the Mind capable of tracing with Pleasure the military Progress of the Hero whose Battles they delineate will also have the associate Taste and admire fine representations of the Work of God in the human Form.
As you wish to take Miss Custis a Testimonial of your recollection of her, I really know not of any Thing more appropriate at this Season, than a fashionable Muff & Tippet; and such may be procured for less than Thirty Dollars, a Pattern of Muslin for a Dress such as you would choose to present will I find cost Sixty dols. at least—a Pattern for a half or undress may be bought for 23 dols.; but let me know what will be most agreeable to you and I will purchase it with Pleasure and pack it up in a manner the least inconvenient for you.
I hope you have suffered no inconvenience from your long unpleasant Walk in the Rain on Sunday last. My best wishes ever attend you as I am always Your sincere Affectionate Friend

Eliza. Powel


Title: From George Washington to Elizabeth Willing Powel, 4 December 1798
From: Washington, George
To: Powel, Elizabeth Willing

My dear Madam,
Eight Street [Philadelphia]Tuesday 4th Decr 1798

Receive, I pray you, my best thanks for the Prints you had the goodness to send me; and my acknowledgments of your kind, and obliging offer to chuse some thing handsome, with which to present Miss Custis. The difference between thirty & Sixty (or more) dollars, is not so much a matter of consideration, as the appropriate thing.
I presume, she is provided with a Muff; of a tippet I am not so certain; but a handsome Muslin, or any thing else, that is not the whim of the day, cannot be amiss. The cost of which, when furnished, you will please to announce to me. Is there any thing—not of much cost—I could carry Mrs Washington as a memento that she has not been forgotten, in this City? And let me tresspass upon your goodness to procure the second edition of the present (on my acct) that you intend for Eliza Law. Without which, a contest (regardless of right—no unusual thing)—in which an innocent Baby may become the Victim of strife.
My present expectation is, that We shall close the business which brought me here, by Friday—Saturday at farthest; when my journey will commence. But before my departure I shall, most assuredly, have the honor of paying my respects to you. With the greatest respect & Affecte. I am always Yours

Go: Washington


Title: To George Washington from James McHenry, 5 December 1798
From: McHenry, James
To: Washington, George

Dr Sir
[Philadelphia] 5 Decr 1798

I submit the inclosed letters to you and Major General Hamilton & Majr General Pinckney. The young gentleman who presented them to me and in whose favour they are has requested to have the honour to present them to you. With the greatest respect I have the honour to be Dr Sir your most obt ⟨st⟩

James McHenry


Title: From George Washington to John Greenwood, 7 December 1798
From: Washington, George
To: Greenwood, John

Sir,
Philadelphia 7th Decr 1798

What you sent me last answer exceedingly well; and I send the first to be altered & made like them, if you can.
Your recollection of these—with the directions and observations contained in my two last letters—the latter especially—supercedes the necessity of being particular in this.
I will however just remark that the great error in those (now returned to you) is, that the upper teeth & bars do not fall back enough thus [sketch] but stand more upright so [sketch (a)] by which means the bar at (a) shoots beyond the gums and not only forces the lip out just under the nose, but by not having its proper place to rest upon frets, & makes that part very sore.
I shall add no more than to request you will be so good as to let me have them as soon as you conveniently can; altered or not altered. Direct for me at this place, or at Mount Vernon, as it is not likely I shall be here more than two or three days longer.
I thank you very much for your obliging attention to my requests—and am Sir With esteem & regard Yr very Hble Servt

Go: Washington

P.S. I am willing & ready to pay what ever you may charge me.


Title: To George Washington from Elizabeth Willing Powel, 7 December 1798
From: Powel, Elizabeth Willing
To: Washington, George

My dear Sir
[Philadelphia] Friday Decr 7th 1798

The amount of the Articles purchased you will find to be Seventy Four dols. & a half. I must request the Favour of you to deliver the enclosed Letter to Mrs Law.
My Heart is so sincerely afflicted and my Idea’s so confused that I can only express my predominant Wish—that God may take you into his holy keeping and preserve you safe both in Traveling and under all Circumstances, and that you may be happy here and hereafter is the ardent Prayer of Your affectionate afflicted Friend

Eliza. Powell


Title: From George Washington to Elizabeth Willing Powel, 7 December 1798
From: Washington, George
To: Powel, Elizabeth Willing

My dear Madam,
Philadelphia 7th Decr 1798

The articles you had the goodness to send me this forenoon (when it was not in my power to acknowledge the receipt of them) came very safe, and I pray you again, to accept my thanks for the trouble I have given you in this business.
Enclosed are Seventy five dollars, which is the nearest my present means will enable me to approach $74 50/100 the cost of them.

Your letter to Mrs Law shall be safely delivered to her and I will endeavor to do the same by the Doll to Eliza.
For your kind and affectionate wishes, I feel a grateful sensibility, and reciprocate them with all the cordiality you could wish, being My dear Madam Your most Obedt & obliged Hble Servant

Go: Washington


Title: Clement Biddle to Tobias Lear, 8 December 1798
From: Biddle, Clement
To: Lear, Tobias

Dr sir
Walnut Street [Philadelphia] Decr 8 [17]98

I have sent a bale wth 5 pieces of Blankets on board the Brig for Alexandria and will endeavor to get the bill of loading in time for this Evening—I am waiting for the picture frame from McEllwee which he has repeatedly promised & dissappointed me. Yr very Ob. st

Clement Biddle


Title: To George Washington from John Greenwood, 8 December 1798 [letter not found]
From: Greenwood, John
To: Washington, George

Letter not found: from John Greenwood, 8 Dec. 1798. On 12 Dec. GW wrote Greenwood: “Your letter of the 8th came safe.”


Title: From George Washington to Elizabeth Willing Powel, 9 December 1798
From: Washington, George
To: Powel, Elizabeth Willing

My dear Madam
Philadelphia 9th Decr 1798

I feel much obliged by your kind & polite invitation to dine with you to day, but am under the necessity of denying myself that pleasure.
I had, previously to the receipt of your Card, resolved not to dine

out of my lodgings while business should detain me in the City: and, in consequence, had declined Invitations from Mr Liston, and the Chevr de Freire. But a more conclusive reason than this, is, that I had requested Generals Hamilton & Pinckney to come prepared this morning, at their usual hour—ten ’Oclock—for the whole day; that a few moments for dinner only might interrupt our daily labour, having dispensed with the Sabbath on this occasion. But of this you must not be the Informer. Be the Weather as it may, I must plunge through it when our business is brought to a close. I am always & Most obediently & affectionately Yours

Go: Washington

I was engaged with the within named Gentlemen when your card came or it should have been answered last night.


Title: From George Washington to John Trumbull, 10 December 1798 [letter not found]
From: Washington, George
To: Trumbull, John

Letter not found: to John Trumbull, 10 Dec. 1798. On 24 Mar. 1799, Trumbull wrote GW: “I have duly received the Letter which you did me the honour to write on the 10th Decr last.”


Title: To George Washington from James McHenry, 11 December 1798
From: McHenry, James
To: Washington, George

Dr Sir
War Department 11th Decr 1798

Inclosed is a schedule shewing the price of rations and component parts at certain posts from the first day of October 1798 to the 30 day of Septr 1799—agreeably to Contract. I have the honour to be D. Sir your most ob. st

James McHenry


Title: From George Washington to Charles Carroll, Jr., 13 December 1798
From: Washington, George
To: Carroll, Charles Jr.

Sir,
Philadelphia 13th Decr 1798.

Mr McHenry—Secretary of War—communicated to me your wish to receive an Appointment in the Corps of Light Dragoons, about to be raised.

Conceiving that the inducement to this application could be no other than a laudable zeal to serve your Country, and a desire to set an example to the young Gentlemen of family & fortune in it, which, undoubtedly would be attended with a happy effect; I informed him, that although it was not my practice to compromit my self beforehand by promises, yet, in this instance I would inform him that it had been, and still was my intention (if circumstances should call me to the field) to offer you a place in my Military family, as an Extra: or Volunteer Aid de Camp; under a presumption that, as you could not contemplate Arms as a profession, rank could be no object, and I was sure that the pay of an Officer would be none; and therefore, that he was at liberty to hint this matter to you. In what light you have understood him, I know not, wch is the reason of my giving you the trouble of this explanation.
My established Aids de Camp, for reason which I had the honor of communicating to Mr Carroll (your father) must be men of Military experience (if to be had)—and in the choice of whom, many circumstances ought to combine. It is unnecessary I hope to add, that at all times I should be glad to see you at Mount Vernon, and with best respects to Mr Carroll and the Ladies of your family I am—Sir Your Most Obedt Hble Servant

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to James McHenry, 13 December 1798
From: Washington, George
To: McHenry, James

Private
Dear Sir,Philadelphia 13th Decr 1798
I am really ashamed to offer the letters &ca herewith sent, with so many erazures &ca; but it was not to be avoided, unless I had remained so much longer here, as to have allowed my Secretary time to copy the whole over again; And my impatience to be on my return homewards, on Account of the Season—the Roads—and more especially the passage of the Susquehanna—would not admit of this. With consideration & respect—I am—Dear Sir Your most obedt Servt

Go: Washington

P.S. Mr. Lear, you are sensible, was engaged with myself & the Genl Officers; of course could not be employed in Transcribing what you will now receive, as the result of our deliberation at the mom[en]t we were engaged in other matters.


Title: From George Washington to James McHenry, 13 December 1798
From: Washington, George
To: McHenry, James

Sir
Philada Decr 13 1798

You will observe that in the arrangement of the officers alloted to New York there is an alternative of Wm S. Smith or Abijah Hammond for Lt Colonel Commandant. Various considerations demand that the motive of this hesitation should be explained. Had military qualifications alone been consulted the name of Colonel Smith would have stood singly and he would have been deemed a valuable acquisition to the service. Had there ever been no other source of objection than the erroneous political opinions of late attributed to him, his honor and attachment to his country would have been relied upon. But as well myself as the two generals whose aid I have had in the nominations have been afflicted with the information well or ill founded that he stands charged in the opinion of his fellow citizens with very serious instances of private misconduct; instances which affect directly his integrity as a man. The instances alleged are various but there is one which has come forward in a shape which did not permit us to refuse it our attention. It respects an attempt knowingly to pledge property to Major Burrows by way of security, which was before conveyed or mortgaged for its full value to Mr William Constable; without giving notice of the circumstance, and with the aggravation, that Major Burrows had become the Creditor of Col. Smith through

friendship to an amount which has proved entirely ruinous to him. While the impossibility of disregarding this information forbade the selection of Col. Smith absolutely, the possibility that it might admit of some fair explanation dissuaded from a conclusion against him.
As it will be in your power to obtain further lights on the subject it has appeared adviseable to leave the matter in the undetermined form in which it is presented and to assign the reason for it. You are at perfect liberty to communicate this letter to the President. Candour is particularly due to him in such a case. It is my wish to give him every proof of frankness, respect and esteem. Lest it should be suspected that Major Burrows has officiously interfered to the prejudice of Col. Smith, it is but justice to him to declare that such a suspicion would be entirely without foundation. With great consideration & regard I have the honor to be Sir Your obedt servt


Title: To George Washington from James McHenry, 13 December 1798
From: McHenry, James
To: Washington, George

Thursday morning [13 December 1798]

The Secy of war has the honour to inform the commander in Chief, that he expects a letter this morning respecting Col. Hall which if received shall be immediately sent to him.