Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, [23 April 1794]
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

[Philadelphia, April 23, 1794]

Mr. Hamilton presents his respects to The President. In compliance with the desire expressed by him, Mr. H has made a memorandum of certain points for consideration in preparing instructions for Mr. Jay, which are herewith sent.
April 23d. 1794


Title: Enclosure: Points to be Considered in the Instructions to Mr. Jay, Envoy Extraordinary to G B, [23 April 1794]
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To:

I   Indemnification for the depredations upon our Commerce according to a rule to be settled.

The desireable rule is—that which theoretical Writers lay down as the rule of the law of Nations (to wit) that none but articles by general usage deemed contraband shall be liable to confiscation and that the carrying of such articles shall not infect other parts of a cargo, nor even a vessel carrying them where there are no appearances of a design to conceal.
Our Treaties contain a good guide as to contraband articles Which fall under the general denomination of instrumenta belli instruments of War.
But if it should be found impracticable to establish this rule, the following qualifications of it occur to consideration.
I   Whether Provisions (defining what shall be deemed such) may not be excepted so far as to render them liable, when going to an enemy’s port not blockaded, to be carried into the port of the other enemy and converted to his use paying the full value. A good rule for estimating this value would be the cost & charges at the place of exportation with the addition of  per Cent?
2dly.   Whether Colony produce going directly from the colony to the mother Country may not be added to the list of contraband articles?
Or in the last resort whether the rule in this ⟨particular,⟩ resulting from the instructions of the Eighth ⟨of⟩ January last may not be admitted? to wit—that colony produce goin⟨g⟩ from the colony to any port in Europe may be ⟨confiscated. ⟩ This is a principle which it is understood has been long adher⟨ed to⟩ by Great Britain and finds a sanction in prece⟨dents under⟩ the antient Governm⟨ent of⟩ France and other maritime powers.
The indemnification for prizes made by proscribed Vessels of which an expectation has been given by the President may be confirmed by convention.
II   Arrangement with regard to the future.
The basis to be the rule already quoted of the general law of Nations.
But it is probable that the same exceptions which may be insisted upon as to indemnification for the past will also be insis⟨ted⟩ upon as to the future.
The idea of a ⟨place⟩ blockaded or besieged by construction which ⟨is⟩ not actually so ought to be excluded ⟨in either⟩ case.
A stipulation against th⟨e sale⟩ of prizes in our ports will probably be ins⟨isted⟩ upon and it is just that it should be ⟨made.⟩
A stipulation that in case of war with any Indian Tribe, the ⟨other⟩ party shall furnish no supplies whatever to such Tribe except such and in such quanti⟨ty only,⟩ as it was accustommed to furnish previ⟨ous to the⟩ war and the party at war to have a right to keep an agent or agents at the posts or settlements of the other party nearest to such Indians to ascertain the faithful execution of this stipulation.

Grounds of adjustment with regard  to the late Treaty of Peace  on the part of the British
I   Indemnification for our negroes carr[i]ed away
II   Surrender of our Posts
On the part of the UStates
I   Indemnification for the obstructions to the recovery of debts not exceeding  Sterling.

It may be desired and would it not be our interest to agree that neither party shall in time of peace keep up any armed force upon the lakes nor any fortified places nearer than  miles to the lakes except small posts for small guards (the number to be defined) stationed for the security of trading houses?
Would it not also be our interest to agree to an arrangement by which each party shall permit to the other, under due precautions and regulations a free trade with the Indian tribes inhabiting within the limits of the other?

Treaty of Commerce
The statu quo may be taken with the following exceptions—
A privilege to carry to the West India Islands in our vessels of certain burthens (say not less than 60 Tons nor more than Eighty Tons) all such articles as may now be carried thither from the Ustates in British Bottoms and to bring from thence directly to the UStates all such articles as may now be brought from thence to the UStates in British bottoms.
The privilege of carrying to G Britain & Ireland manufactures of the UStates similar to those which now are or here after may be allowed to be carried thither by other nations who stand on the footing of the most favoured nation and upon terms of admission equally good.
As equivalents—
The extra Tonnage and duties on British Vessels and goods imported in British vessels to be done away & if desired a stipulation to be entered into that the commodities and manufactures of Great Britain & Ireland may be imported into the Ustates upon terms equally good with the like commodities & manufactures of any other nation and that the duties upon such of them as now pay ten per Cent ad valorem & upwards shall not be increased and that the duties upon such of them as now pay under 10 ⅌ Cent ad valorem shall not be increased beyond 10 ⅌ Cent.
A Treaty on these Terms to be made for any term not exceeding  years.

But if such a Treaty cannot be made it deserves consideration whether a Treaty on the basis of the statu quo for a short term (say five years) may not be adviseable as an expedient for preserving peace between the two Countries.


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, [23 April 1794]
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

[Philadelphia, April 23, 1794] “The Secretary of the Treasury … has the honor to transmit sundry drafts of passports in cases which have been handed to him for that purpose by the Secretary of State.…”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, 23 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Treasury Departmt. April 23d. 1794.
Sir,

When I wrote my letter of the 21st instant I had intirely forgotten the existence of your two instructions of the 8 of Augt., owing probably to the effect upon my memory of my sickness which soon after ensued. I only recollected that the loan had been authorised by me pursuant to your special direction, and I conceived that the subject of it’s disposition was wholly open. I regret this circumstance, though no inconvenience could have ensued.

For I am of opinion, that until the actual investment of the monies in purchases, they remain liable to any disposition which you may think proper, with reference to either of the two Acts of the 4th & 12th of August 1790. The loan has been made without particular reference to either of them, agreeably to the intimation in your letter of the 27th of July, namely, that it was not your purpose by seperate instructions to prevent the loans from being carried on without distinction in Holland. Accordingly no distinction has been made. And as the Contract for the loan will not be specially bottomed upon either of the Acts, I conceive the instructions which have been given may be varied so as to accommodate the application to the purposes of both or either.
It is not, however, essential that any alteration should now be made. If the whole sum is to be drawn for here, as I should have to remit from hence what remains to complete the million of Florins towards the payment of the next June instalment, I can fulfil this object, with convenience to the public service, by drawing upon the fund created by the last loan—which will leave in the Treasury here an equivalent sum applicable to purchases. This will be the same thing in principle, (without the inconvenience of a double operation) as to draw bills upon that fund to be sold here, in order to place the proceeds in the Treasury, and to purchase other bills to remit to Holland, in order to place there a fund for the payment of the June instalment.
But if it is your intention at all events to attach the proceeds of this loan to purchases and to exclude absolutely the further application of any part of it towards payments to France or otherwise on account of the foreign debt, I will thank you to signify your pleasure accordingly. And then the accounts of the Treasury will be so regulated as to fix that course of proceeding irrevocably.
But I think embarrassments may be found to attend this course, which prevent me from recommending it.
With the highest respect,   I have the honor to be &c

Alexander Hamilton


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Otho H. Williams, 23 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Williams, Otho H.

Treasury Department, April 23, 1794. “Enclosed are two passports.… You will perceive that those Vessels have permission to depart in Ballast, with passengers for St. Domingo. You will therefore grant them clearance accordingly.”


Title: Cabinet Meeting. Opinion on Submission of Thomas Pinckney’s Letters to Congress, [24 April 1794]
From: Hamilton, Alexander,Knox, Henry
To:

[Philadelphia, April 24, 1794]

The Secretary of state submits to the Secretaries of the treasury and war, whether the inclosed letters from Mr. Pinckney or either of them shall be sent to congress.
E. R. is of opinion, that the letter of the 28th. of Jany, and not the other ought to be sent.
April 24, 1794.
I am [of] opinion that it is not adviseable to send either. That of the 28th of January contains no new substantive matter material to the information of Congress & mere stimulants do not seem to be necessary.
A Hamilton
I do not conceive the propriety of transmitting these letters to Congress

H Knox


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Samuel Hodgdon, 24 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Hodgdon, Samuel

[Philadelphia] April 24, 1794. “The Secretary of the Treasury presents his Compliments to Mr Hodgdon and requests an answer to the note on the enclosed paper which is to be returned.”


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Jeremiah Olney, 24 April 1794
From: Olney, Jeremiah
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Custom-House,Providence 24th. April 1794.
Sir.

The Bond, of which the enclosed is an Account, being the only one of the kind I have taken since the receipt of your circular directions of the Tenth of May 1792, the requisition did not occur to me when my quarterly Abstracts were transmitted, or this Account should have been forwarded then.
The Vessel in which the Merchandize were imported, had a passage to Washington of 67 Days; and no Certificate to cancel the Bond has yet come to hand. Mr. Rhodes says he expects she will arrive at Boston, on her return, in the course of this Month; but having had no information relative to the Certificate, he is fearful it has not been procured. Should this be the case, will it not be proper Sir, if other satisfactory evidence of the Duties’ having been secured at Washington should be obtained from the Owner (who is expected in the Brigantine) to postpone the suit of the Bond to a future period? I hope for your reply before the 11th of May.
I have the Honor to be &c.

Jereh. Olney Collr.
Alexr. Hamilton Esqr.Secy. of the Treasury.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Jeremiah Olney, 24 April 1794
From: Olney, Jeremiah
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Providence, April 24, 1794. “The Act continuing the Embargo, and that passed the Second Instant, have come to hand. Is any Bond to be taken for a registered Vessel, bound from One District to another in the United States … in Ballast only?”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Jeremiah Olney, 24 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Olney, Jeremiah

Treasury Department April 24th. 1794
Sir,

I am informed by your letter of the 14th. instant of the decision of the Court in the case of Messrs Arnold & Dexter.
I approve of your intention to take measures for an appeal to the proper Court of the United States. I could wish that you would request the District Attorney to forward to me the pleadings in the cause, and the reasons upon which the Court founded its decision.
With great consideration   I am Sir   Yr Obedient Servant

A Hamilton
Jeremiah Olney Esqr.Collector Providence


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Edmund Randolph, 24 April 1794
From: Randolph, Edmund
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Philadelphia, April 24, 1794. “Concurring, as I do, with you, that the treaty between the United States and Sweden, exempts the Vessels of the latter from the operation of the embargo, I beg leave to suggest to you, whether it may not be expedient to give instructions to the several Collectors accordingly.”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to William Bradford, 25 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Bradford, William

[Philadelphia, April 25, 1794. On May 1, 1794, Bradford wrote to Hamilton and referred to “your Letter of the 25th ultimo.” Letter not found.]


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to William Ellery, 25 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Ellery, William

[Philadelphia, April 25, 1794. “The object of the resolution being … that no permits are to be granted to Vessels licensed for the whale and cod fishery to touch and trade at foreign ports.… Instructions on the execution of a law do not immediately go from the President of the United States. This department is the organ of the instructions of the President to the collectors.” Letter not found.]


Title: Report on the Contract Made with the Bank of the United States for a Loan of Two Million Dollars, [25 April 1794]
From: Treasury Department,Hamilton, Alexander
To: Speaker of the House of Representatives

[Philadelphia, April 25, 1794Communicated on April 25, 1794]
[To the Speaker of the House of Representatives]

The Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Order of the House of Representatives of the 28th. of February 1794, respectfully makes the following report:
The paper A, herewith transmitted, is a Copy of the Contract with the Bank of the United States respecting the Loan of two Millions of dollars had of that Institution in conformity with a provision for that purpose in the Act by which it is incorporated.
According to the intent of this Contract as understood by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Bank, the first instalment of 200,000 dollars was payable on the first of January 1793. The Secretary in a report to the House of Representatives of the 30th. of November 1792, submitted a provision for reimbursing the loan to the Bank. None was made ’till the time for reimbursing the first instalment as understood between the Treasury and the Bank, had elapsed on the first of January 1793. The Secretary by Letter informed the Bank that he would leave in deposit, as an offset against that instalment a Sum of 200,000 dollars, ’till Legislative provision should be made concerning the Matter. An Act of Congress of the 2d of March 1793, authorised the payment of this Instalment out of the proceeds of the Foreign Loans. But the then Attorney General being of Opinion that upon the legal Construction of the Contract compared with the words of the Act, the payment could not be made ’till the 25th of June 1793; the Completion of the business accordingly remained suspended ’till the 20th. of July following, when a Warrant issued to pay over the proceeds of the Bills in deposit to the Treasurer, and another Warrant to pay an equal Sum to the Bank. Interest upon the Instalment ceased on the 31st. of December 1792, by Virtue of the Deposit.
The foregoing transaction confirmed the principle of paying each instalment on the last day of the year. The Secretary in a report to the House of Representatives of the 21st. of December 1793, submitted a proposition for making provision for the second instalment. None having been made, he by a Letter to the Bank of the 31st. December 1793, informed that the Legislature not having yet had leisure to provide for the second instalment of the two Million loan, he had concluded to suspend calling into the Treasury the last installment of a Loan of 800,000 dollars which had been contracted with the Bank, and that that Sum would remain in deposit as an offset against the first mentioned instalment ’till provision should be made by Law. This Business still remains in the same situation no provision having yet been made by Law; but the effect is to arrest Interest at the rate of 6 ⅌ Cent. upon the Sum payable to the Bank, by a fund obtained from the Bank itself bearing only an Interest of 5 ⅌ Cent.
All which is humbly submitted

Alexander HamiltonSecy. of the Treasury.
Treasury Department April 25th. 1794.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Jeremiah Wadsworth, 25 April 1794
From: Wadsworth, Jeremiah
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Philadelphia April 25. 1794
Dear Sir

The Note which was among Chaloners papers payable to John B Church Esqr from Thomas Mifflin was for Sixteen hundred Dollars the interest was One thousand & forty dollars. I had a demand on the same Person for one Hundred Dollars. I have put the three Sums into a Bond payable to myselfe in one Year from the 24th of this Month. I have taken this method that if the project of Sequestration should come on the Carpet Mr Church may be safe. It was necessary to give a Years Credit as the Note was out Lawed and the payor Not in Cash. I wish for your approbation of this transaction. Their is due to Wadsworth & Church from Timothy Seymour of Hartford more than two thousand dollars & their is some doubt of his ability to pay but by lending him One thousand or twelve Hundred Dollars more a Mortgage can be obtained on Land that will serve the whole. If you approve of this transaction I will endeavor to compleat it. You may rember that it was agreed between us that all the Monies due Wadsworth & Church should be made payable to me when ever I took notes or Bonds. The Necessity of pursuing this mode in the mortgage is evident. You will direct me also on that subject.
I am D sir   Your   very Humble sert

Jere Wadsworth
Col Hamilton


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, 25 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Treasury Department April 25. ’94
Sir

I beg leave by way of explanation to submit the grounds of my opinion, that the President may vary his instructions of the 8th of August last in reference to the application of the last loan obtained in Holland.
A summary of the preceding transactions will serve to throw light upon the subject.
The President by his Commission of the 28 of August 1790, gave full power to the Secretary of the Treasury to make the whole of the two loans contemplated by the Acts of the 4th & 12th of August.
When in the beginning of June last certain considerations rendered it in my judgment expedient to obtain a further loan; I concluded to address myself to the President, not for want of power to proceed in the business, but to obtain the sanction of his opinion and instruction as to the eligibility of the measure. This will appear from my letter of the 3d. of that month.
After some explanatory communications, I received from the President his letter of the 27 of July, informing me of the shape the business had taken in his mind.
On the basis of that letter, I prepared the instructions of the 8 of August, which I considered merely as directions to me from the President in the execution of the general power of the 28th of August 1790, to be understood in connexion with the letter of the 27 of July.
The proposition in my report of the 15th of June was that the proposed Loan should be made upon the authority of both Acts, and the letter of the President just mentioned precisely declares he did not intend by separate instructions to prevent the loans from being carried on without distinction in Holland.
Accordingly I sent no new powers for making a further loan, but merely an additional instruction to make a loan of three millions of florins on the basis of the former powers. This additional instruction too made no special reference to either act, but left the matter to proceed as before, without distinction.
The consequence will be that the loan as in all preceding cases will be founded upon both the acts. I send for your inspection all the contracts heretofore made as the evidence of what will be the form of the one not yet forwarded; all of which expressly and indiscriminately refer to both the Acts.
The inference is that according to the contract itself (the formal obligatory Act) the loan will be placed upon the joint foundation of the two Acts, equally applicable therefore to the purpose of either.
This being the case it is in my mind a clear proposition, that the money remains in that state liable to be applied according to either or both the Acts, ’till one of two things happens; an actual investment, or the being carried in the books of the Treasury specifically to the account of the particular appropriation.

It appears to me that there are but two circumstances which can attach irrevocably a similar fund to a particular destination—either its being so attached in its original creation by the formal obligatory Act, (to wit—the contract for the loan) or its having receiv’d in the treasury its ultimate form by being carried to the account of the particular appropriation. This last, where the fund in its creation is liable to different destinations is, as I suppose, the only thing which consummates & fixes the precise destination—’Tis the record, so to speak, of the sentence or direction of the law, ascertaining its application.
If this position be as solid as I believe it to be, it will follow, that all collateral instructions of the President intervening between his original power to make the loan, and the final application of the loan, are mere directions to the Secretary of the Treasury, binding on him until they are revoked, but revocable at pleasure by the President until they are definitely acted upon at the Treasury.
This is my view of the subject; for troubling the President with which, I have no other motive than merely to explain the ground of an important opinion.
I proceed now to execute the order of the President contained in his letter of yesterday.
The embarrassments which I suppose may possibly arise from fixing at this time the destination of the fund, are connected with the following considerations.
The laws, except by the means of loans, make no provision for the payment of any part of the principal of the foreign debt. Instalments of the principal of the Dutch debt are falling due yearly. The same is the case of the Debt to France, deferring the computed anticipations as has been heretofore done. Perhaps it may become the policy of the country in a short time to accelerate in the latter case.
The state of European affairs forbids a reliance on further loans there. The actual situation of the United States (and a fortiori its possible one) is likely to call for all the aid of domestic loans, which is obtainable, for domestic purposes. This resource therefore could not be depended upon as a substitute for foreign Loans for foreign objects. Still less, & for the same among other reasons, could additional taxation be counted upon.

Our credit therefore and in certain events our security in a degree, may depend on retaining a part of the resource in question in a situation to come in aid of both. Our credit entirely, and our security, in a very small degree, are of far greater consequence, than the savings to be made by the investment of 1,200,000 Dollars in purchases.
Past experience admonishes to caution. The last loan of a million of florins, and the present one of three millions are in some sort accidents. Antecedent intelligence had in each case forbidden the expectation of either, as the President will see from the letters herewith transmitted. Had these not happen’d, & had the monies originally drawn to this Country for purchases been hastily so invested, our credit would in all probability have been lost, and things, which we believe it of importance to have been done, would have been impracticable.
A considerable defalcation of Revenue, this year seems probable.
I feel in a manner not less interesting to my own reputation than to the public interest, the advantage of extensive purchases at the existing juncture—and though I think the opportunity will not escape, it enters into the plan which I should approve to proceed gradually & circumspectly in availing ourselves of the advantage. But I do not incline either wholly to tie up the fund at this time, or to precipitate its application to that single object. I think the matter had better be left open to be governed by circumstances as things shall unfold.
It appears to me better at the hazard of some criticism to wave or defer an advantage inferior in magnitude, rather than incur a probable risk of a disadvantage of much greater magnitude.
It appears by the letter from the Commissioners announcing the loan already communicated to the President, that the receipts on account of it may be considerably protracted. This is a circumstance of some weight in the decision.
I submit these observations with all deference to the decision of the President, and have the honor to [be]
with the highest respect &c.

Alexander Hamilton


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, 25 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

[Philadelphia] April 25, 1794. “The Secretary of the Treasury presents his respects to The President & sends a letter to him from Captn. Cochran.…”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, 25 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

[Philadelphia] April 25, 1794. “The Secretary of the Treasury … has the honor to transmit a Memorial from Colo. Weissenfelt, which came enclosed to him.”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, 26 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

[Philadelphia] April 26, 1794. Encloses “the draft of a passport for the American sloop Eliza, now in this port, bound for St. Domingo with passengers, for the President’s signature.”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Otho H. Williams, 26 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Williams, Otho H.

Treasury Department April 26th. 1794
Sir

Samuel Smith Esqr. has applied for a passport for a small vessel to be sent in Ballast to the Island of Bermuda which is herewith enclosed.

Mr Smith not being possessed of the names of the Vessel and Master they are left blank in the paper to be inserted by you.
Another passport has been granted for Captain Kean Master of the Schooner Eagle, bound for St Domingo in ballast, and with passengers you will accordingly grant clearances for those vessels, which it is to be observed are to be both American.
I am Sir   With great Consideration   Your Obdt. Servant

A Hamilton
Otho H Williams EsqrCollector Baltimore


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Edmund Randolph, 27 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Randolph, Edmund

[Philadelphia] April 27th 1794
Dr. Sir

I did not receive the draft of your reply to Mr. Hammond on the subject of the instructions of the 8th of June till bed time last night, nor could I without a much more considerable delay than seems to comport with your plan pretend to enter into an accurate scrutiny of the paper.
I must therefore confine myself to a very few remarks.
I   If my memory serves me right your position that the UStates alone suffer from the operation of the abovementioned instructions is not accurate. I take it, provisions on board of all neutral vessels going to any port of France are liable to the same treatment; except in the single case of their going to a place blockaded or besieged—when the rigor of the law of nations is inforced against us by a confiscation in the first instance whereas in respect to Sweden and Denmark it is mitigated by the circumstance of admonition first & confiscation afterwards. But even in this particular the other neutral powers (Sweden & Denmark excepted) were left in the same predicament with us. I do not understand, either, that in fact any ports of France have been deemed blockaded so as to produce confiscation except those actually so. But not having instructions before me I cannot speak with precision:

II   You seem to take the position too strictly—that none but such articles as are peculiar to war are deemed contraband. Other articles besides these are usually deemed contraband (as naval stores, which are the general instrument of commerce in time of peace as well as a mean of War).
III   You appeal strongly to the conduct of G B for a century past as to the question of provisions being treated as contraband or otherwise interdicted from being carried to any enemy country. I fear examples may be cited upon you which will include the point and more. Is there not a treaty between Holland & England within a Century which goes much further? And you may be perhaps pressed by examples from other Countries. I remember a declaration from France to the State General (in the time of Louis XIV as I believe) which imposes much more extensive restrictions.
III   There appears to me too much tartness in various parts of the Reply. Energy without asperity seems best to comport with the dignity of National language. The Force ought to be more in the idea than in the expression or manner. The subject of the paper is the instructions of the 8th of June not those of the 6 of November. I suspect from some latter lights which I have received that more of justification for the former can be found in the practice of Nations than I was originally aware of—and the expression of our sensibility & the energy of our resistance ought to be proportioned to the nature of the case.
On the whole, I submit whether it be not adviseable to give no other reply than a general one declaring that the doctrines advanced in support of the instructions of the 8th of June do not appear to us well founded but that being among the objects committed to Mr. Jay’s negotiation a particular reply is foreborne. We are still in the path of negotiation. Let us not plant it with thorns.
Yrs. with respect & esteem

A H


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from George Washington, [27 April 1794]
From: Washington, George
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[Philadelphia, April 27, 1794]
Sir,

I cannot, under all the circumstances of the case, satisfy myself, that I am at liberty to go contrary to my last instructions; and that I have authority to direct the money, which I have expressly directed to be applied to the purchase of the public debt, to be applied to any other object.
Still, however, I am willing, that the embarrassments, which you consider as probable, shall be communicated to Congress; and I have no objection to recommend to them to order the money to be reserved for the exigencies which you point out.
Philadelphia April the 27th. 1794.Go: Washington


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to John Jay, 28 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Jay, John

Philadelphia April 28.1794.
My Dear Sir

Inclosed are communications from the Collector of this Port & from Mr. Seton of New York respecting a vessel for your accommodation. Mr. Trumbal at my request has visited the vessels here & thinks there is none but the Andriana (American) which will answer your purpose.
Will you be so good as to decide as shall appear to you best upon the vessel you would like & if at New York Mr. Seton is instructed to complete the pecuniary arrangement. If the Andriana here should be your choice let me know & she shall be engaged; it is proper to decide promptly as the taking off the embargo (a possible event) may render the obtaining a proper vessel more difficult & the terms worse.
Upon the whole, I am pretty strongly inclined to the opinion that a fast sailing American will be the most eligible.
In calculating chances, these Questions press themselves. Could we rely that a passport from the French Minister would protect an enemy bottom from the capture of French Cruisers? Who can say, from moment to moment, what may be the condition of any of the European neutral Powers with regard to France. If you should once go to France may not policy interpose so many embarrassments to your progress as might frustrate your mission? I need not urge the state of things in that country.
With true respect & regard   Dr. Sir   Your obedient servant

A Hamilton
John Jay Esqr&c


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Edmund Randolph, 28 April 1794
From: Randolph, Edmund
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Philadelphia, April 28, 1794. “The Secretary of State has the honor of sending to the Secretary of the Treasury the applications for … passports.”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to William Seton, 28–29 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Seton, William

[Philadelphia, April 28–29, 1794. On May 2, 1794, Hamilton wrote to Seton and referred to “mine of the 28th or 29th of which I did not keep a copy.” Letter not found.]


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, 28 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Treasury DepartmentApril 28. 1794
Sir

I should not advise a present reference to the Legislature on the subject of the application of the loan; as under the circumstances of that body at this moment much debate would probably ensue and perhaps no decision.
I am the less induced to advise this step; as the expedient itself will be hereafter practicable, if it shall appear to be necessary. It will be some time before the proceeds of the loan will be realised in the Treasury. When there, though the appropriation will be fixed to the sinking Fund, the actual disbursement of the monies may be accelerated or retarded as may be judged adviseable according to the developpement of circumstances.
With the most perfect respect   I have the honor to be Sir   Your most Obedient servant
The President of The UStates


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Oliver Wolcott, Junior, 28 April 1794
From: Wolcott, Oliver, Jr.
To: Hamilton, Alexander

T. DC. Off April 28. 1794
Sir

The circumstance announced in the inclosed memorandum, came to my knowledge in consequence of a Letter directed to me officially; I esteem it to be my duty to lay the fact before you as I recd. it, well knowing it to be a deviation from those rules upon which you have directed the business of the Treasury Department to be conducted.
I am &c

The Honb A H.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from John Daves, 29 April 1794
From: Daves, John
To: Hamilton, Alexander

New Bern [North Carolina] April 29, 1794. “I have received your letter dated 3rd Instant, containing instructions.… As yet I have not been able to get a judicious able man, to undertake owing to the small sum they will be entitled to.… I have received from the Treasurer of the United States a draft on me for One thousand dollars, which shall be disposed of agreeable to your instructions.”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Robert Morris, 29 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Morris, Robert

T.D. April 29th 1794
Sir

I have directed the suits brought with a view to try the validity of attachments of public stock to be discontinued—being satisfied agreeably to the opinions of the Attorney General and the Attorney of the District that such Attachments cannot be supported.
I am Sir   Your Obedient Servant

The Honorable ⟨Rob⟩ert Morris Esqr.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from James Smith, 29 April 1794
From: Smith, James
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[Hampton, Virginia, April 29, 1794. An entry in JPP“Journal of the Proceedings of the President,” George Washington Papers, Library of Congress. for July 14, 1794, reads as follows: “Return’d to the Secy. of the Treasury the following papers which he had submitted to me.… Letter of Jas. Smith 29 April.…” Letter not found.]


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, 29 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

[Philadelphia] April 29, 1794. “The Secretary of the Treasury … encloses the draft of a passport for a schooner called the Eliza of New York, for the President’s signature. The application which accompanies it, comes from a number of French Emigrants now in New York.…”


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Tench Coxe, 30 April 1794
From: Coxe, Tench
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Treasury Department, Revenue Office, April 30, 1794. “I have the honor to enclose for submission to the President a contract in the form of a bill of parcels for a temporary supply of oil for the use of the L: House at Sandy Hook. It is lower than the price in this City, and as low as the New York market admitted of. The attempts I have sometime made to secure a years supply by a large contract have not yet succeeded owing to the apprehensions of an interruption by War of the Whaling Voyages.…”


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Edmund Randolph, 30 April 1794
From: Randolph, Edmund
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[Philadelphia] April 30, 1794. “The Secretary of State has the honor of inclosing … a paragraph from a letter of Mr. Pinckney, dated January 10th 1794. It respects M. la Colombe, a french Officer, formerly in our army … and seems to lie more particularly in the department of the Secretary of the Treasury. Any answer, which may be thought adviseable the Secretary of State will forward to Mr. P.”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Edmund Randolph, 30 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Randolph, Edmund

Philadelphia, April 30, 1794. “The bearer is a French officer in extreme distress. He wishes to go to St Domingo but has not the means of paying his passage. Is there any way of accommodating him out of the public fund? I refer him to you.…”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, 30 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

[Philadelphia] April 30, 1794. Encloses “the draft of a passport for the President’s signature intended for the Ship Hope, now at Charleston.…”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, 30 April 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Treasy. Departt. April 30. 1794.
Sir,

Inclosed I have the honor to send you the translation of a letter from Mr. Fauchet, of the 21st instant.
The arrangements of the Treasury have been taken so as to correspond with the epochs of promised payment. But I entertain no doubt that I can facilitate an arrangement between the Bank & Mr. Fauchet which will accomplish in substance the object of his letter. I did not think it proper, however, to take any definitive step without previously placing the subject under the eye of the President.
The Minister is desirous of securing an additional sum for satisfying two drafts of his predecessor, which he specifies. It will be within the compass of our means to perform this also. But it is not within the limit heretofore prescribed and it includes besides considerations which are proper only for the decision of the President.
With perfect respect &c.

Alexander Hamilton


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to ———, [April-May 1794]
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To:

[Philadelphia, April-May, 1794]

My own hope of making a short excursion to Europe the ensuing spring increases. Believe me, I am heartily tired of my situation, and wait only the opportunity of quitting it with honor, and without decisive prejudice to the public affairs. This winter, I trust, will wind up my plans so as to secure my reputation. The present appearance is, that the depending elections will prove favorable to the good cause, and obviate anxiety for the future. In this event, my present determination is, to resign my political family, and set seriously about the care of my private family. Previous to this I will visit Europe. There I shall have the happiness of meeting you once more. But will not a few months afterwards give us the pang of a final separation? Let us hope the best. Adieu.


Title: Suggestions for a Commercial Treaty, [April-May 1794]
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To:

[Philadelphia, April-May, 1794]

To follow the specification of Objects on a Commercial Treaty
This enumeration presents generally the objects which it is desireable to comprise in a Commercial Treaty; not that it is expected that one can be effected with so great a latitude of advantages.
If to the actual footing of our commerce and Navigation in the British European dominions could be added the privilege of carrying directly from the UStates to the British West India Islands, in our own bottoms generally or of certain defined burthens, the articles which by the Act of the 28th of George 3d Chapt 6th may be carried thither in British Bottoms & of bringing from those Islands directly to the UStates in our bottoms of the like description, the articles which by the same Act may be brought from those Islands to the UStates in British bottoms—this would afford an acceptable basis of a Treaty for a term not exceeding fifteen years; and it would be adviseable to conclude a Treaty upon that basis.
But if a Treaty cannot be formed upon a basis as liberal as this, it is conceived that it would not be expedient to do any thing more than to digest the articles of such a one as the British Government shall appear willing to accede to; referring it here for consideration and further instruction previous to a formal conclusion.
There are other points which it would be interesting to comprehend in a Treaty and which it is presumed would not be attended with difficulty. Among these is the admission of our commodities and manufactures generally into the European Dominions of G Britain upon a footing equally good with those of other foreign Countries.

   Note   This is now the case though a general impression to the contrary has prevailed. See Procla of 1792.

 At present only certain enumerated articles are admitted. But though this enumeration embraces all the articles which it is of present material consequence to us to export to those Dominions; yet in process of time an extension of the objects may become of moment. The fixing of the privileges which we now enjoy by toleration of the Company’s Governt. in the British East Indies, if any arrangement could be made with the consent of the Company for that purpose would also be a valuable item.
The foregoing is conformed to the ideas in which the Secretary at War & Attorney General appeared to concur.
It is my opinion, that if an indemnification for the depredations committed on our Trade and the execution of those points of the Treaty of peace which remain unexecuted on the part of G Britain can be accomplished on satisfactory terms and it should appear a necessary mean to this end to combine a Treaty of Commerce for a short term on the footing of the statu quo, the conclusion of such a Treaty would be consistent with the interests of the UStates.

AH


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Daniel Delozier, 1 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Delozier, Daniel

Treasury Department May 1st 1794
Sir,

I duly received your letter of the 13th of April containing an extract of a Letter from General Williams to you.
When any instructions are addressed to the Collector and he is not in a condition to execute it personally on account of absence or sickness, it is understood that the person who acts in his stead as Collector will take up the business and execute it. I request that this idea may be made known to the person who acts as Collector (if not yourself) and that I may be informed who is the person.
I am, Sir, with consideration   Your Obedient Servant

A Hamilton
⟨Daniel⟩ Delozier EsquireSurveyor of the Port ofBaltimore.


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to William Ellery, 1 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Ellery, William

T. D. May 1st 1794
Sir

The case stated in your letter of the 8th of April with regard to certain vessels which violated the law laying an embargo, ought to be reported to the District Attorney, in order that he may judge whether the parties are not indictable for disobeying an injunction of the law and what may be proper to be done.
You have been already instructed in regard to the Schooner Boyne. Inclosed I transmit you the Copy of a letter from Capt Wanton to the President relating to the transaction. I request that you will reply to that part of it which respects your conduct and declarations in the affair.
I am Sir, with great consideration   Your obedt. Servt

Wm Ellery Esq.Collector Newport


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to William Ellery, 1 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Ellery, William

Treasury DepartmentMay 1. 1794
Sir

A representation has been made that there is within your district a [Transport Ship the Britannia in the British service which was employed by Admiral Jarvis to bring General Rochambeau to Newport] This Ship is to be permitted to depart notwithstanding the embargo.
With consideration I am Sir   Your obed Servant Alex Hamilton

The Collector of New Port


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Benjamin Lincoln, 1 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Lincoln, Benjamin

Treasury Department, May 1, 1794. “The difficulty stated in your letter of the 10th of April with regard to certain claims for drawback can only be obviated by an application to Congress, there being no where a power vested to dispense with the proof which is required by law of the landing of the goods in a foreign country.”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Jeremiah Olney, 1 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Olney, Jeremiah

Treasury DepartmentMay 1st. 1794.
Sir,

I have to reply to that part of your letter of the 31st. of March relating to certain vessels which escaped the Embargo.
The question is whether an indictment generally will lie for disobeying the injunction of the law? This is the only mode of punishment if any exists. The Collector of Newport has been instructed to report these cases to the Attorney of the district in order that what shall appear proper may be done.
With great consideration,   I am Sir   Your Obedient Servant

A Hamilton
Jere Olney EsquireCollector Providence


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, 1 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Treasy. Departt. May 1st 1794.
Sir,

I have the honor to send herewith drafts of sundry passports for vessels to go with passengers to St. Domingo; but I begin to suspect that this is, or may be made a cover for carrying on mercantile speculations contrary to the true spirit of the Embargo, & in a manner liable to great inconveniency.
It is easy to see that specie to a vast amount may be sent in such vessels to purchase West India produce, either to be brought to the United States, or to be carried elsewhere—a circumstance which may suddenly drain us of too large a proportion of our Coin & occasion mischievous consequence.
It seems to me therefore of real moment either that the practice should be wholly discontinued, or that it should be put under regulations calculated as much as possible to avoid abuses.
To this end, security may be required, that the vessel shall proceed to the place for which she shall be cleared & return from thence directly to The United States in ballast. This security, calculating the proportion between vessels & Cargoes, ought to be for not less than treble the value of the vessel, to be judged of by the Collector of the District from which she is about to depart. An oath may also be added that the vessel is bona fide destined to the place for which the passport is requested, & is truly intended to take with her nothing but passengers & their baggage, together with the necessary Sea-stores for the voyage and particularly that she is not intended to take with her any merchandize or money for any purpose of trade or traffic whatsoever.
A further addition to these precautions may be that a vessel shall take with her at least at the rate of one passenger to two tons of her burthen, to be entitled to the benefit of the passport which will forward the end for which the passports are granted & be a collateral proof of sincerity.
Even with all these precautions, I have a serious doubt whether any permissions should be granted beyond the present applications.
With the most perfect respect &c.

A Hamilton


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Wilhem and Jan Willink, Nicholaas and Jacob Van Staphorst, and Nicholas Hubbard, 1 May 1794
From: Willink, Wilhem,Willink, Jan,Van Staphorst, Nicholaas,Van Staphorst, Jacob,Hubbard, Nicholas
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Private
QuadruplicateAmsterdam 1 May 1794
Sir!

We have to request your acceptance of our most hearty Thanks for Your very polite letter of 24th January, and for your alacrity to contribute to the success of the object, We commissioned Mr. Sterett to obtain for us.
We are apprized of the Doubt whether the Constitution by prescribing a general Uniform rule of naturalization, did not preclude the granting it in any particular Case: wherefore We desired the presentation of our petition less in the View of attaining the favor partially, than to furnish an occasion for the question being brought on upon the general principles, which We flattered ourselves might conduct to the fulfillment of our Wishes and views.
Be assured We have sincere and due gratitude for your recommendation of our petition to the Legislature of New York, to the patronage of Your Friends equally strong in the defeat of our application, as if it had been the means of our complete success: and that We shall deem it one of the fortunate circumstances of our Life, to have it in our power to render You any useful or agreeable Office, which We beg of you to consider at Your disposal.
We are respectfully   Sir!   Your mo. ob. hb. Servants

Wilhem & Jan WillinkN & J. Van Staphorst & Hubbard
Alexa. Hamilton Esqr.


Title: Edmund Randolph to Alexander Hamilton and Henry Knox, 2 May 1794
From: Randolph, Edmund
To: Hamilton, Alexander,Knox, Henry

[Philadelphia] May 2, 1794. “The Secretary of State submits to the Secretaries of the Treasury and War, whether any, and what step can be taken upon the inclosed memorial of John Leamy.”


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Edmund Randolph, 2 May 1794
From: Randolph, Edmund
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[Philadelphia] May 2, 1794. Encloses “applications … for passports to St. Domingo, they being supposed to come within the rule.”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to William Seton, 2 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Seton, William

Philada May 2d 1794
Dear Sir

I take it for granted that mine of the 28 or 29th of which I did not keep a copy will have led you to conclude an arrangement for the vessel preferred by Mr Jay.
Lest that letter should by any accident have miscarried (as you appear not to have received it on the 30th when the post came away) I repeat what it contained—It authorised you, according to Mr Jay’s choice, to agree for the vessel; chartering her for a sum certain (in lieu of all expences & risks) to go to Great Britain in Ballast.
I cannot judge how far the certificate of the minister or Consul would answer instead of a Register to protect from the Algerines. I think it probable it would. But of this Mr Jay can judge as well as any body.
With esteem & regard   I remain Dr. Sir   yr obedt Servt

A H
William Seton EsqrNew york


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Wilhem and Jan Willink, Nicholaas and Jacob Van Staphorst, and Nicholas Hubbard, 2 May 1794
From: Willink, Wilhem,Willink, Jan,Van Staphorst, Nicholaas,Van Staphorst, Jacob,Hubbard, Nicholas
To: Hamilton, Alexander

DuplicateAmsterdam 2d. May 1794.
Sir!

Since our last Respects of 1 April We are deprived of your esteemed favors.
We inclose You the Account Current of the United States up to 30th Ultimo: The Balance whereon due by us Holld. Curry. f1,769,068. 4. 8 We transfer to their Credit in a new Account.
Yesterday was the Day for the Undertakers of the Half of the Loan of 1 January last of Three Millions of guilders, to decide whether they would accept the other Half of said Loan, at four successive Monthly periods. Only f1,092,000. has been assumed by them, and such other persons as inclined to take of these Bonds: which is the best possible proof, how timid our monied people are, in employing their monies, or the great advantages they expect to reap from them: And evincing at same time, how very critically We availed ourselves of the only favorable moment that has occurred to launch such a Loan upon our Market.
No less opportune has its success been, to provide us Funds for discharging the Instalment of One Million of Florins due the First proximo on the Loan of the United States of 1 June 1782. The payment of which, with the Interests due at the same Period by the United States, We have in virtue of the general Authority vested by You in us, already advertised in our Newspapers. A Circumstance that tended to excite people to engage for their optional Half of the last Loan.
We shall keep You regularly advised, of any further sale We may make of the 408 Bonds still remaining undisposed of, as well as of every other information necessary for your Government.
It being now beyond a Doubt, that a Tax is to take place upon the principal Sum of all Loans negotiated here, exclusive of a Stamp Tax upon each subdivided Bond of f 1000.: To avoid being subjected thereto for the Loan of 1 January last by waiting [for] the Legal Powers from Mr. Short, We executed the Bond, by virtue of the order given to us in Your Letter of 12th August past; An Authenticated Copy, and Translation of which Bond You have inclosed, that We request you to have ratified by the President of the United States, and to return to us, with the Ratification so soon as possible, in order that We may fulfill our positive Engagement, to deposit same with the Notary.
We are with great Regard and Esteem


Title: Report on Informal Advances, 3 May 1794
From: Treasury Department,Hamilton, Alexander
To:

[Philadelphia, May 3, 1794. The minute book of the select committee appointed to examine the Treasury Department records on this date a “Letter from the Secy. of the Treasy. accompanying statement of informal advances.” Letter and report not found.]


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, 3 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Treasury Dept. May 3d. 1794.
Sir,

Inclosed are copies of a Letter of mine of the 25 ultimo to the Attorney General and of his answer.
Concurring entirely in opinion with that officer, I am led to bring the subject under the eye of the President only from the reflection that a foreign Government is concerned in the question and unless I receive a direction to the contrary, I shall act in conformity with that opinion. I am urged for a reply in a particular case which will go to Europe by the Vessel which shall carry Mr. Jay.
With perfect respect   I have the honor to be &c.

Alex: Hamilton


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, 3 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Treasury Department, May 3, 1794. Encloses “a letter from the Commissioner of the Revenue of the 30th of April, with his opinion that it is adviseable to confirm the purchase of Oil to which it relates.”


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from William Ellery, 5 May 1794
From: Ellery, William
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Colle. Offe. [Newport, Rhode Island] May 5th 1794
Sir

By the last Post I recd. your Circular of the 18th and 23d. of last mo. the first inclosing the Acts of the 2nd, and of the 18th of Apl. relative to the Embargo, the last respectg. Swedish Vessels; also your letter concerning the Schooner Boyne dated Apl. 22nd. Last Saturday that Schooner sailed for New york, in consequence of a Letter written to Capt. John Wanton by the Governor of this State dated Apl. 30 1794 in which he mentions that the last evening he had received a Letter from the Secretary at War, expressing “that the case had been under consideration and been determined that said Vessel was not liable to detention at Newport, that therefore she be permitted to proceed upon her Voyage, and that he the Secretary at War was instructed by the President of the United States to request me to give you orders to permit the departure of said Vessel. You will therefore permit said Vessel to depart if by you detained.” The Capt. of the Boyne procured the letter from Capt. Wanton to show to me, and gave me liberty to copy it. I thought this a sufficient warrant for permitting her to depart for New york after taking the necessary bonds. This letter will be accompd. by Abstract of Sea letters for the Quarter endg. with the last March.
I am   Sir   Yr. obedt. servant

W Ellery Colle
Alexr. Hamilton Esqe.Secry of Treasury

PS   Inclosed is a request of Gibbs & Channing. I have only to mention that the Coffee was shipped not long before the duties would have become due, and to desire to be informed, if it should be permitted to be shipped in another bottom, whether the duties thereon are to be paid prior to its being shipped as requested.
W Ellery Colle


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Jeremiah Olney, 5 May 1794
From: Olney, Jeremiah
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Custom-House,Providence 5th May 1794.
Sir.

Your Three Letters of the 23 and 24 of April, I received by the last Post.
Attention shall be paid to your instructions, relative to Sweedish Vessels. I have laid the case of the Two Vessels, which departed contrary to the embargo Act, before the District Attorney, who has promised to give me his Opinion in writing, which shall be transmitted to you. Your request in the Letter of the 24th., was anticipated on that Day, the Pleadings in Mr Arnold’s Cause being then enclosed to you: the Court did not give the Reasons on which the decision was founded.
I have the Honor to be &c.

Jereh. Olney Collr.
Alexr. Hamilton Esqr.Secy. of the Treasury.


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, 5 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Treasury Dept. May 5. 1794.
Sir,

It appears to be the desire of the writers of the enclosed Letter, that it should be laid before you, for your direction, which I accordingly do. I think the Embargo will operate upon the case, notwithstanding the ultimate destination of the vessel.
With perfect respect &c.

A Hamilton


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, [5 May 1794]
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

[Philadelphia, May 5, 1794]

Mr. Hamilton presents his respects to The President. Mr. Talleyrand De Perigord formerly Bishop D’Autun, who the President is probably informed, lately arrived here informs Mr. Hamilton that he has a letter of Introduction to The President from Lord Landsdown and asks how & when he can present it. Mr. Hamilton promised him to enquire to day—but on account of the President’s deafness this morning did not think it adviseable to trouble him on the subject. If the President by a line will be so good as to enable Mr. Hamilton [to] answer the Inquiry, it will oblige him & Mr. Perigord.
Monday Morning


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Tench Coxe, 6 May 1794
From: Coxe, Tench
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Treasury Department, Revenue Office, May 6, 1794. “I have the honor to request that there may be issued to Tench Francis Esquire a warrant for six thousand Dollars; that sum being stated by Mr. Francis to be immediately necessary to carry on the works for the defence of the Port of Philadelphia.”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to John Jay, 6 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Jay, John

Philadelphia May 6. 1794
My Dear Sir

I send you herewith sundry papers and documents, which contain information that may be not useless to you in your mission.
I had wished to have found liesure to say many things to you but my occupations permit me to offer only a few loose observations.
We are both impressed equally strongly with the great importance of a right adjustment of all matters of past controversy and future good understanding with G Britain. Yet important as this object is, it will be better to do nothing than to do any thing which will not stand the test of the severest scrutiny and especially which may be construed into the relinquishment of a substantial right or interest.
The object of indemnification for the depredations committed on our Trade in consequence of the instructions of the 6th of November is very near the hearts & feelings of the people of this Country. The proceeding was an atrocious one. It would not answer in this particular to make any arrangement on the mere appearance of Indemnification. If nothing substantial can be agreed upon, it will be best to content yourself with endeavouring to dispose the British Cabinet of their own accord, to go as far as they think fit in reparations leaving the UStates at full liberty to act afterwards as they deem proper. I am however still of opinion that substantial indemnification on the principles of the instruction of January 8th may in the last resort be admissible.
What I have said goes upon the Idea of the affair of indemnification standing alone. If you can effect solid arrangements with regard to the points unexecuted of the Treaty of peace, the question of indemnification may be managed with less rigor and may be still more laxly dealt with if a truly beneficial treaty of Commerce (embracing privileges in the West India Islands) can be established. It will be worth the while of the Government of this Country, in such case, to satisfy, itself & its own citizens, who have suffered.
The principle of G Britain is that a neutral nation ought not to be permitted to carry on in time of War a commerce with a Nation at war which it could not carry on with that Nation in time of peace. It is not without importance in this question that the peace system of France allowed our vessels access to her Islands with a variety of our principal staples & allowed us to take from thence some of their products & that by frequent colonial regulations this privilege extended to almost all other articles.
The great political & commercial considerations which ought to influence the conduct of G B towards this country was familiar to you. They are strengthened by the increasing acquisitions in the West Indies, if these shall be ultimately confirmed, which seem to create an absolute dependence on us for supply.
I see not how it can be disputed with you that this Country in a commercial sense is more important to G Britain than any other. The articles she takes from us are certainly precious to her, important perhaps essential to the ordinary subsistence of her Islands—not unimportant to her own subsistence occasionally, always very important to her manufactures, and of real consequence to her revenue. As a Consumer the paper A will shew that we stand unrivalled. We now consume of her exports from a milion to [a] milion & a half Sterling more in value than any other foreign country & while the consumption of other countries from obvious causes is likely to be stationary that of this country is increasing and for a long, long, series of years, will increase rapidly. Our manufactures are no doubt progressive. But our population and means progress so much faster, that our demand for manufactured supply far outgoes the progress of our faculty to manufacture. Nor can this cease to be the case for any calculable period of time.
How unwise then in G Britain to suffer such a state of things to remain exposed to the hazard of constant interruption & derangement by not fixing on the basis of a good Treaty the principles on which it should continue?
Among the considerations which ought to lead her to a Treaty is the obtaining a renunciation of all pretension of right to sequester or confiscate debts by way of reprisal &c.—though I have no doubt this is the modern law of Nations. Yet the point of right cannot be considered so absolutely settled as not to make it interesting to fix it by Treaty.

There is a fact, which has escaped observation in this country (and which as there has existed too much disposition to convulse our Trade, I have not thought it prudent to bring into view) which it is interesting you should be apprised of. An Act of Parliament 27 George 3d Chapter 27 allows foreign European Vessels single decked & not exceeding seventy Tons burthen to carry to certain Ports in the British West Indies particular articles therein enumerated and also to take from thence certain articles.
This consequently puts an end to the question of precedent, which is so strongly urged against a departure from The British Navigation Act in our favour; since it gives the precedent of such a departure in favour of others and to our exclusion, a circumstance worthy of particular notice. Our relative situation gives us a stronger plea, for an exception in our favour, than any other Nation can urge.
In Paper B the idea of a Treaty of commerce on the footing of the statu quo for a short period (say five years) is brought into view. I should understand this as admissible only in the ⟨event of a⟩ satisfactory arrangement with regard to the points unexecuted of the Treaty of Peace.
The Navigation of the Mississippi is to us an object of immense consequence. Besides other considerations connected with it, if the Government of the UStates can procure & secure the enjoyment of it to our Western Country, it will be an infinitely strong link of Union between that Country & the Atlantic States. As its preservation will depend on the naval resources of the Atlantic States the Western country cannot but feel that this essential interest depends on its remaining firmly united with them.
If any thing could be done with G Britain to increase our chances for the speedy enjoyment of this right it would be in my judgment a very valuable ingredient in any arrangement you could make. Nor is Britain without a great interest in the Question, if the arrangement shall give to her a participation in that Navigation & a Treaty of Commerce shall admit her advantagously into this large field of commercial adventure.
May it not be possible to obtain a Guarantee of our right in this particular from G Britain on the condition of mutual enjoyment & a trade on the same terms as to our Atlantic Ports?
This is a delicate subject not well matured in my mind. It is the more delicate as there is at this moment a negotiation pending with Spain, in a position I believe not altogether unpromising, and ill use might be made of any overture or intimation on the subject. Indeed in such a posture of the thing an eventual arrangement only could be proper. I throw out the subject merely that you may contemplate it.
With the most fervent wishes for your health comfort & success   I remain Dr Sr   Your Affectionate & Obedient ser
AAA   But you will discover from your instructions that the opinion which has prevailed is that such a Treaty of commerce ought not to be concluded without previous reference here for further instruction. It is desireable however to push the British Ministry in this respect to a result that the extent of their views may be ascertained.

John Jay Esqr


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from George Washington, [6 May 1794]
From: Washington, George
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[Philadelphia, May 6, 1794]
(Private)
Dear Sir,

In answering your note of yesterday, respecting of Mr. Tallayrand de Perigord, I do not hesitate to declare that, I find it difficult to hit upon a line of conduct towards characters, under the description that Gentleman is—Emigrants—that is satisfactory to my own mind; or more properly, that is free from exception, by avoiding what might seem incivility, on one hand, for unpleasant political consequences on the other.
I can perceive very clearly, that the consequences of receiving these characters into the public Rooms will be, driving the French Minister from them. His visits are much less frequent than they were—and an occurrence on tuesday last (which shall be mentioned when you call here) has left no doubt as to the cause.
A particular introduction of these Characters (out of the usual course) would, I presume, be more noticed, than the reception of them in public. It has become expedient therefore, in my opinion, that principles should be adopted in these cases (not only for the President, but the Executive Officers also) by which evils may be avoided and uniformity observed.
What these had best be, deserves consideration.
My wish is, and it is not less my duty as an officer of the Republic, to avoid offence to powers with whom we are in friendship by conduct towards their proscribed citizens which would be disagreeable to them. Whilst, at the same time, these emigrants, if people of good character, ought to understand that they will be protected in their persons and property, and will be entitled to all the benefits of our laws—for the rest, they must depend upon their own behaviour and the civilities of the Citizens at large, who are less restrained by political considerations, than the Officers of Government must be.
Yours always

Go: Washington
May 6th 1794.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Meletiah Jordan, 7 May 1794
From: Jordan, Meletiah
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Frenchman’s Bay [District of Maine] May 7, 1794. “I beg leave to inform you of the particulars of two seizures made in this District. The first was eleven Grindstones part of a Cargo landed at Mount Desert out of a Nova Scotia vessel contrary to the Revenue Laws from there transported to Union River where they were siezed. The other seizure is a Vessel & Cargo found proceeding to Sea during the Embargo for Nova Scotia without any papers; the particulars of which I will relate.… A fishing Schooner called the Polly of Mount Desert … I have … libelled … as also the Grindstones. The trial to commence the third Tuesday of June at Portland. If I have not done right you will please to communicate your pleasure on the subject.…”


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Edmund Randolph, 7 May 1794
From: Randolph, Edmund
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Philadelphia, May 7th. 1794.
Sir

I beg leave to inclose to you a letter from Mr. Hammond, of the 6th. instant, which I received this morning. The second paragraph, respecting the vessel, is the only one, which requires to be answered. The subject of this, depending on the knowledge of the facts, which can be best obtained by the Officers under the direction of your department, you will oblige me by taking it up, and after satisfying yourself of the proper step, and communicating it to the President, to notify his determination to Mr. Hammond. I trouble you on this occasion, on account of my immediate departure to meet Mr. Jay, and the urgency of Mr. Hammond.
I have the honor, Sir, to be   with respectful esteem   Yo. mo. ob. servt.

Edm: Randolph


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Edward Carrington, 8 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Carrington, Edward

[Philadelphia, May 8, 1794. On May 19, 1794, Carrington wrote to Hamilton: “Yours of the 8th. Instant covering a letter for Mr. Augustine Davis the post Master at this place was recd.” Letter not found.]


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Tench Coxe, 8 May 1794
From: Coxe, Tench
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Treasury Department, Revenue Office, May 8, 1794. “I have the honor to request, that a warrant may be issued, in the name of Matthew Spillard, for (five) five hundred Dollars, as an advance to him, on a/count of his contracts for supplying Rations to the Troops of the United States at the Post of Philadelphia.”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Augustine Davis, 8 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Davis, Augustine

[Philadelphia, May 8, 1794. On May 19, 1794, Edward Carrington wrote to Hamilton: “Yours of the 8th. Instant covering a letter for Mr. Augustine Davis … was recd.” Letter not found.]


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Benjamin Williams, 8 May 1794
From: Williams, Benjamin
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[Philadelphia] May 8, 1794. “The Act for the erection of a Light House and Lighted Beacon on Hatteras & Shell Castle Island having passed in Congress, representing as I do the District in which these Lights are to be erected, I take the liberty to name to you Mr. Adam Gasgin a suitable Person for the keeping the Light House, this Gentleman lives near the place, is a Representative of Carteret County in the Legislature of N Carolina & a Man of unquestionable integrity.”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Wilhem and Jan Willink, Nicholaas and Jacob Van Staphorst, and Nicholas Hubbard, 8 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Willink, Wilhem,Willink, Jan,Van Staphorst, Nicholaas,Van Staphorst, Jacob,Hubbard, Nicholas

Treasury DepartmentPhiladelphia May 8th 1794.
Gentlemen

Your letter of the 27th. of December came duly to hand and gave me the agreeable intelligence of your having effected a loan for the United States.
This information arrested the progress of the measures I was taking to place in your hands by Remittances from hence a sum equal to the ensuing Installment of the Dutch debt as well as for the payment of Interest up to the first of June inclusively; taking it for granted that you would apply of the monies of the last loan to that purpose, as much as was necessary with what had been already remitted to complete the object.
I calculate that the remittances heretofore made and announced to you will exceed the sums payable for Interest to the first day of June next inclusively by 126.694 Guilders.
This sum will remain for future disposal as shall be found expedient.
I have instructed the Treasurer of the United States to draw upon you and remit to you a bill payable to yourselves for one Million of Florins; which is to cover a payment out of the fund produced by the last loan of the installment which will become due on the first of June. This circumstance of drawing the bill instead of directing you by letter to apply the sum requisite to that payment has relation [to] considerations of interior arrangement in this Department.
You will please to charge this bill in your Account as a payment on account of the loan last obtained and at the same time credit it as a remittance from the Treasurer for the payment of the Installment of the principal of the Dutch debt which falls due on the first of June. These added to your usual entries will correspond with the course of the transaction in the forms of the Treasury.
There has been such a press of business for some time past, both on the President and myself, that I am sorry not to be able to say any thing explicit to you on the subject of the charges upon the Loan. The next will convey to you a decision.
You will probably before this reaches you, have heard of the depredations committed upon our commerce in the West Indies by British Cruisers in consequence of instructions of the 6th. of November, and of the effects which they produced here. An Embargo, essentially to prevent our Vessels from becoming a prey, which however was extended to foreign Vessels for certain reasons of momentary policy has been the only measure of Government which has grown out of that cause, except that of sending to Great Britain an Envoy extraordinary to arrange the affair on some equitable ground and obviate if the British Cabinet shall be so disposed Sources of future Collision. Peace continues to be decidedly the desire of this Government—and the Cabinet of Great Britain must be very unjust and unreasonable if an interruption of it takes place. In every event we trust that the good understanding between your country and ours will remain undisturbed—towards the preservation of which there is an unfeigned cordiality on our part.
But it has become prudent under all the circumstances, to extend our preparations of Military Supply. In this view I request as a favor of you that you will undertake to procure at Amsterdam or elsewhere as it can be done with most certainty advantage and convenience, One Hundred Tons of Salt-Petre and to cause the same to be shipped as soon as may be to the United States to which purpose you may apply any of the funds that shall be in your hands. It is observed by the latest prices current from Amsterdam and London, that the Article was much cheaper at the latter than at the former place. Hamburgh, Gottenburgh and Lisbon have also been mentioned as places from which it may be advantageously extracted. It is my wish that the risks may be divided, by Shipping the Article in different Vessels and that insurance may be made for the full value.
I should not request this service of you, if it were not in the belief that you may render it without compromising yourselves in any degree towards your Government, with which we cannot entertain an idea of the possibility of a rupture and in the full confidence of your zeal for the Interest of the United States.
With great consideration and esteem   I remain Gentlemen   Your very obedient servant.

P. S. The Treasurer has been directed to draw bills upon you for 200,000 florins to be paid out of the proceeds of the last Loan which bills I request may be duly honored.

Messrs. Wilhem & J. W. & N. & J. V. Staphorst and Hubbard.


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Sharp Delany, 9 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Delany, Sharp

T. D. May 9th. 1794
Sir

It is suggested to me that some of the officers of the Customs have been concerned in the disorderly proceedings, which lately took place with regard to the schooner Swift Packet. I am therefore to desire that you will make a particular inquiry as to the Persons who were active in the affair, in order that the truth of the above suggestion may be critically ascertained. This is a matter so serious in its nature that I shall rely on your zealous exertion without delay to obtain and communicate the requisite information to me. I hope to hear from you with precision by tomorrow morning ten o’clock. This time, I presume, will not be too short as you have been already engaged in inquiries relative to the transaction.
I am Sir with consideration & esteem   Yr obedt Servt

Sharp Delany Esqr Collr.Philada


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Samuel Hodgdon, 9 May 1794
From: Hodgdon, Samuel
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Philadelphia May 9th, 1794
Sir,

I attended last evening what is here called a Town-meeting—permit me to give you the following description of it. By six o’Clock about three hundred of the lower class of people were assembled, when for want of more respectable characters Colonel Morgan, Mr. Leiper, Neddy Pole and Mr. Pennington wer called on to preside. The meeting being thus organized, without further ceremony the Moderator, Morgan, handed to the Secretary Pennington, a number of resolutions cut and dried—and asked the Mob whether they should be read, all vociferated yes. The Secretary after making apologies for want of better lungs, read the resolutions (which were lengthy) through. Leiper then came forward to address the rabble, his speech was worthy of such an orator—he attempted to explain, and then bitterly complained of the meditated tobacco and snuff excise as he was taught by the resolution-writer to call the duty. He said the whole fraternity were not able to raise the money, or give the requested security. Pole next came forward to complain of the injuries intended on the Auctioneers, having finished his reading and speech, without one word of debate the question on the resolutions was called for. The Moderator desired to be informed whether they would take them up separately or together, all being satisfied with the debates and fully understanding the merits of the resolutions they agreed to pass them in gross; which was instantly done—and three cheers ended the meeting. The spectators of the farce whom I took to be more than two thirds of the persons present, were distress’d to see with what facility a few demagogues could mislead and abuse an ignorant but harmless people. I shall say nothing of the resolutions more than that they were well wrote, impertinent and insidious; a copy of them was directed to be presented to the President, the Vice President as President of Senate and the Speaker of the house of Representatives.
With respect and esteem   I am Sir,   Your most obedient servt

Samuel Hodgdon
Colonel Hamilton.


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, 9 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Philadelphia May 9. 1794.
Sir,

The enclosed letter from Mr. Hammond of the 6th instant was transmitted to me by the Secretary of State with a request that after satisfying myself of the step proper to be taken, I would communicate it to you & notify your determination to Mr. Hammond.

The copy herewith sent of a letter from Mr. Rawle, exhibits the facts, which appear in the case; and reasoning from them, the conclusion is, that the proceeding complained of is as wanton & unprovoked, as it is illegal & disorderly. There is no doubt, that justice to the parties concerned, the maintenance of the Laws and the discouragement of a practice, which attempts an usurpation of the functions of Government and goes in subversion of all order, requires that steps should be seriously taken to bring the offenders to justice.
It is the opinion of the Attorney of the District, that the case is not of the cognizance of the Federal Judiciary. Hence it becomes necessary, that it should be referred to the authority of the State. But it appears to be proper, under the special circumstances, that a letter should be written on the part of the President to the Governor of Pennsylvania communicating the case & the complaint of the minister, & calling upon him in earnest terms to cause the proper legal steps to be taken to bring the offenders to Justice, and thereby give security to the parties and repress so exceptionable & disorderly a spirit.
With regard to the restoration of the Vessel, in the condition in which she was preceding the trespass; it is not perceived that the nature of the case requires the extraordinary interposition of the Government for that purpose, and the precedent might be an embarrassing one. The vessel is one belonging to Citizens of the United States, employed indeed as is now stated by a british consul, but for the personal accommodation of certain subjects of Great Britain, that is, to convey them to their own Country, nor for a purpose properly governmental. It is not perceived, that this situation sufficiently distinguishes her case from the common one of a Vessel suffering injury by the trespess of unauthorised & lawless individuals, for the redress of which, including indemnification, the ordinary course of law is competent. It is not understood that there exists any impediment to the repossession of the Vessel by her Commander.
If these ideas are approved by the President, it will remain to direct the proper communications to the Governor & to the british minister.
With perfect respect &c.

Alexander Hamilton.

P.S. I will have the honor of waiting on the President between 12 & one o’Clock to know if he has any further commands in the subject.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Catharine Greene, 10 May 179[4]
From: Greene, Catharine
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Mulberry Grove [Georgia] May 10th 179[4]
My Dear Sir

Your letter dated the 3 Sep 1793 arrivd here 20th of April and the moment I received it, I got into my boat, and hastened to town with all possible Speed, having no person here before whom I could legally swear to the enclosed facts, as nearly as I can recollect them. Judge Pendleton was then in Court; I did not hesitate to send for him and told him the wretched Situation I was in on your account; and after a little raillery he consoled me by telling me that your affair had some time since been Settled very much to your honor and that now my deposition would be of no use—the fact being produced in the public prints only could induce me to delay it a moment.
I send it therefore now not with an expectation that it will be of the least consequence but only to shew you that I can never be in-grateful to a man whose perfections are the only Sourse of Malicious Calumny—and whose goodness to me will never be forgotten.
It is now more than a year since I ordered Mr Ward of New York (my agent there) to pay you the Sum you were so good as to lend me in my distress—and I will thank you to write me one line to let me know if you have received it.
I am and ever shall be your devoted affectionate and Grateful
Cathe Greene.

Mr Miller has just returned from Augusta and tells me that the money has not been paid according to my order as the certificates which was lodged for that purpose have not been sold—but that he will make other arrangements to have it paid.

C G


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Hammond, 10 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Hammond, George

Philadelphia May 10th 1794
Sir,

In consequence of a short absence of the Secretary of State from this city, the prosecution of an inquiry into the affair mentioned in your letter of the 6th instant has been committed to me; and I have it in instruction from the President to communicate to you the result.
The facts, as they have appeared upon inquiry, are presented in a report from the Attorney of the district, of which a copy is transmitted with this letter.
It is matter of sincere regret, that an irregularity of such a nature should have happened, and especially that it should have implicated in unpleasant circumstances the officers concerned.
The opinion of the Attorney of the district being, that the case is not of the cognizance of the federal judiciary, it became proper to address it to the notice of the authority of the State. This the President has caused to be done; and in a manner, which, it is confided, will produce adequate exertions to bring the offenders to justice and to restrain the repetition of similar outrages. Nor is it doubted that the officers in question will find full security during their continuance in this city.
With regard to the restoration of the vessel in the condition in which she was prior to the commission of the trespass, by which she has suffered—The President does not think the case is of a nature to require the particular interposition of government for that purpose. A persuasion is entertained that you, Sir, will on farther reflection be sensible that the vessel being merely a private vessel, belonging to a citizen of the United States and though, as you suggest, engaged by the British Consul at Norfolk, yet engaged only for the personal accommodation of individuals and the injury, which she has sustained, having been done by a tumultuous assemblage of unauthorised persons—the case results in a private trespass, to the redress of which, including indemnification, the ordinary course of law is entirely competent. It were to render accidents of this kind too serious to make them objects of special reparation by government.
It is understood that the vessel is, or may be at pleasure in the possession of her commander.
With great respect and esteem I have the honor to be &c

Alexander Hamilton
Mr. Hammond.


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, [12 May 1794]
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

[Philadelphia, May 12, 1794]

The Secretary of the Treasury presents his respects to the President & sends the enclosed for his decision—submitting his opinion that it is not adviseable to grant the permission requested. This case is not precisely within the rule already adopted as a general one.
May 12. ’94.


Title: Cabinet Meeting. Opinion on Call for Volunteers from Kentucky, 13 May 1794
From: Randolph, Edmund,Hamilton, Alexander,Knox, Henry,Bradford, William
To:

[Philadelphia] May 13. 1794

At a meeting of the heads of the departments and the attorney General, at the house of the President of the United States, the subject of affording an auxiliary force to Major General Wayne for the purpose of enabling him to make a vigorous and offensive campaign against the hostile Indians being considered, it was advised, that he be authorised, to call for two thousand mounted volunteers from Kentucky, for the period of four months, if he should judge the measure expedient.

Alex Hamilton
Edm: Randolph

Wm Bradford
H Knox


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from William Ellery, 13 May 1794
From: Ellery, William
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Colles Offe. Port of Newport [Rhode Island]13th. May 1794
Sir,

In compliance with your request I now reply to Capt Wanton’s letter to the President. The Schooner Boyne did not arrive here at 10 o’clock A.M. the first day of April, nor did the Custom house boat bring her Register ashore, and deliver it to the Collector at 4 o’clock P.M. The Inspector, who went on board, declares that She arrived between 12 and 1 o’clock, and that the Captain came ashore with him in the Custom house boat, and the Depy. Colle. declares that the Captain delivered him his Register and Clearance at one o’clock, and that at the opening of the Offe. in the afternoon, upon bond being given, he furnished the Capt. with the necessary papers, and returned his Register. Neither Cap. Wanton nor any other person informed me or any officer of the Customs that the Pilot of the Schooner had said that she intended to sail immediately back to St. Johns; nor do I believe that She had a pilot distinct from the Captain. In the evening after the arrival of the Boyne Capt. Wanton came to my house, and asked me whether I wanted his assistance to stop her. I replied that I did not want any assistance; for that she was not bound to a foreign port, and was cleared out for New york, or words to that purpose. He rose immediately from his Chair, and as he turned to quit the room said I swear I will stop her, and instantly left the house. This to the best of my recollection was all that passed between us. It is not true that I said I wanted none of his Assistance, and that she might go where she pleased. I was perfectly calm and the idea of despising his Assistance was not in my mind. What he has written about his conduct, and that of the gentlemen who offered their service to assist him in bringing the Schooner to the Wharff, and unbinding her sails may be true. The Capt. of her told me that they ran her hard a ground in a dock. As for the approbation the Govr. and Co. gave to his Conduct. The Letter which the Vice-Consul wrote to the Governor on that occasion was read in the House, and the matter referred to him, without the Utterance of a single word of approbation or disapprobation by any one member. This information I have from several members of the Assembly, and from the Surveyor who were all present when the letter was read. I should stop here; but as my Conduct and that of the Officers of the Customs of this Port, hath in other instances besides that of the Boyne been censured by Capt. Wanton I hope I shall be pardoned for making a few remarks on what he has written concerning two vessels which sailed from this harbour since the Embargo, and concerning the Ship from Jamaica which had robbed one of our Vessels &c.
With regard to the first I do declare, and the other Offrs are ready to make the same declaration that he never informed me or them, that either of those vessels had shipped a new hand, and more, that neither of us had any conversation with him relative to them. It is true they had their papers for they could not have returned to Providence without them. With regard to the last, he says that he offered his service in the same way the last summer, when the Ship from Jamaica ran away &c., but he was informed it was none of his business, they wanted none of his assistance. He never offered his Assistance to the Custom house in the case of the Catherine William J. Davis master, and of course he never received such an answer from either of the Officers. Indeed the business of that Ship was in the hands of the District Judge and District Attorney. Perhaps he might intend, that he had offered his service to them and that they had given him the rough answer he complains of.
The District Judge informs me that he had no conversation with him respecting that Ship until she had departed, and the District Atty. was so ill that he conversed only with his particular friends when that affair was in agitation.
Capt. Wantons views in writing the letter referred to have not I am sure escaped the discernment of the President.
However questionably he has rendered his character for veracity yet I verily believe he wishes to serve his country, and that an appointment to the command of the fortifications to be erected in this Port would effectually cure his injured feelings; but I should be exceedingly mistaken if such an Appointment did not deeply wound the feelings of every respectable character in this Town. If it should be thought that an unjust prejudice or resentment may have dictated this reply I should wish to appeal for the character of Capt. Wanton to our Representatives in Congress. With great consideration
I have the honor to be Sir, yr. most obedt. servt.

W Ellery
Alexr. Hamilton Esqe.Secry of the Treasury


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Wilhem and Jan Willink, Nicholaas and Jacob Van Staphorst, and Nicholas Hubbard, 13 May 1794
From: Willink, Wilhem,Willink, Jan,Van Staphorst, Nicholaas,Van Staphorst, Jacob,Hubbard, Nicholas
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[Amsterdam] 13 May 1794.
Duplicate
Sir!

Confirming our last respects of 2 Instant, We have now but to advise receipt from the Treasurer of the United States of a Bill drawn upon us by the President of the Bank of the United States for Hd. Cy. f 590,000. which We place to the Credit of the United States.
We acquainted You under date of 24 Februy. that the Bill no. 463 of the Bank of the United States on us to order of Saml. Meredith Esqr. Treasurer of the U. S. had not then reached us: It has not since come to our hands, wherefore We request You to desire the Treasurer to remit us the Third or Fourth of said Draft.
We are respectfully   Sir   Your most ob. hb. Servts

Wilhem & Jan WillinkN & J. Van Staphorst & Hubbard
Alexr. Hamilton Esqr.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Tench Coxe, 14 May 1794
From: Coxe, Tench
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Treasury Department, Revenue Office, May 14, 1794. “I have the honor to request of you a warrant for forty thousand Dollars in favor of Tench Francis Esquire Agent &c. to be applied towards the purchases of the objects in the two Estimates No 1 & 2 of the Secrety of War, contained in his letter to you of the 12th. of April last.”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Hammond, 14 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Hammond, George

Philadelphia May 14. 1794
Sir

I did not receive till this Morning your letter of the 12th instant. As the Secretary of State is now returned to the seat of Government, it is only necessary for me to refer that letter to him, in order that he may reply to such part of it as requires a reply, which I have accordingly done. With respect
I have the honor to be Sir   Your most Obed & humble serv

His ExcellyGeorge Hammond Esqr&c


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Edmund Randolph, 14 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Randolph, Edmund

Philadelphia, May 14, 1794. “The inclosed papers will inform you of the present state of the affair which in your absence you committed to me, respecting the Swift Packet.”


Title: George Washington to Alexander Hamilton and Edmund Randolph, 14 May 1794
From: Washington, George
To: Hamilton, Alexander,Randolph, Edmund

Philadelphia, May 14, 1794. “Consider, attentively, the Memorial of Walter Stewart, David H. Conyngham, Joseph Gilpin and J Grubb (with the papers accompanying it, in behalf of themselves & others) and report to me your opinions thereupon.”


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Edmund Randolph, 15 May 1794
From: Randolph, Edmund
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[Philadelphia] May 15, 1794. Encloses “a letter from mr. Fauchet requesting a passport for a vessel charged with his dispatches.” Requests “the Secretary to order one to issue as soon as he possibly can.”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Washington, 15 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Treasury Department, May 15, 1794. Transmits “for the President’s signature, the draft of a passport upon application from the French Minister.…”


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Richard Harison, 16 May 1794
From: Harison, Richard
To: Hamilton, Alexander

New York 16th: May 1794
Dr Sir,

Permit me to call your Attention to the present State of the Laws for mitigating or remitting Forfeitures or Penalties. The first Act upon this Subject was passed the 26th. of May 1790 and has been continued by the Legislature. It extends only to such as arise under the Laws for collecting Duties of Impost and Tonnage and for regulating the Coasting Trade. Hence it was supposed necessary when the Excise Law was passed in 1791 to make a particular Provision with Relation to Penalties and Forfeitures accruing in Consequence of it. This Provision was limited to one Year after the last Day of June then next, and I do not find that it has ever been continued. With Regard, therefore, to all the Forfeitures and Penalties under the Excise Laws, there appears to be no existing Provision of the Nature originally contemplated for remitting or mitigating them. How far this Omission has been accidental I am unable to determine, and I must submit to your Judgment the Propriety of remedying it in future, if it shall be judged adviseable.
Our Friend Lawrance appears very much pleased with his new Appointment. The Chancellor’s would have given great Satisfaction to many of his Well Wishers; and it would not be disagreeable if the Appointment should be transferred to some Character equally meritorious.
Accept my sincere Respects and best Wishes and believe me Dr Sir
ever your’s

Rich: Harison
Hon. Alexr. Hamilton Esqr.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Edmund Randolph, 16 May 1794
From: Randolph, Edmund
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[Philadelphia] May 16th. 1794
Dear sir

This day the bill which was drawn upon you by Fulwar Skipwith for supplies to our sailors in the west Indies becomes due. The President has agreed to pay it out of his contingent fund, whensoever it shall be replenished. As I am the responsible person for this draft, and Mr. Skipwith has informed me of his distress for money; you will oblige me by letting me have nine hundred dollars, to be accounted for out of the President’s contingent fund. With this sum, I will take up the bill, and whatever remains shall be applied to Skipwith’s further demand; which will not even then be wholly discharged.
I am dear Sir, &c.

Edm: Randolph.


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Thomas Willing, 16 May 1794
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Willing, Thomas

Treasury Department, May 16, 1794. “I request that the Bank will advance to the Secretary of State Nine hundred Dollars towards defraying certain expences which have occurred in the West Indies in relation to the public service.…”


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Benjamin Lincoln, 17 May 1794
From: Lincoln, Benjamin
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Boston, May 17, 1794. “… By the inclosed you will see that we have made a different estimate of the value of Livres from the estimate in Philadelphia. This creates discontent among the Merchants here and makes it necessary for me to lay the matter before you for your direction.”