Title: From George Washington to Henry Lee, 30 June 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Lee, Henry

(Private)
Dear Sir,Philadelphia 30th June 1792.
Your favor of the 15th came duly to hand, but at a time when I was much engaged with the Secretary of State in dispatching Mr Pinckney to the Court of London—and in considering other business of importance.
I shall repeat in this letter what I have declared to you on a former occasion—vizt—that wishing to promote the public weal, & to make justice and impartiality the lines by which to walk, to accomplish this, every information that will enable me to work on so solid a basis, or which would enable me to investigate with more accuracy the characters of public men—or the utility of public measures, cannot fail of being acceptable to me, whilst I have any thing to do with either—particularly the latter.
Having premised these truths, I shall add, on the subject of your letter, that I can no more condemn G[eneral] K[nox] on the evidence of Colo. D[arke’]s letter to you, than I am disposed to go into a full vindication of his conduct against the implications which are contained in that Letter—When assertion stands against assertion, recourse must be had to collateral circumstances to come at the truth, or the preponderating weight, but these are not necessary in the instance before us, for it will not be unfair to Declare, that the conduct of Colo. D—— is uncandid, and that his letter is equivocal. He acknowledges in it, that when I asked if he would serve, if you should be appointed to the chief command, that he gave no answer; but does not, in any part of his letter tell you what answer he gave G.K. to the same question; unless you take the following for one, when he was applied to, to know if he would accept of an appointment “I told him I first wanted to know who would command the Army, and said something of you, and some other” but are these equivocal expressions to be placed against the positive declaration of the other? especially too, when Colo. D—— in relating the conversation which passed between himself & me, has mistaken both the substance and tendency of it; For you may be assured, Sir, I never mentioned your name, or the name of any man living to him as one who was in the smallest degree fixed on, for the command.

The Secretary at War, himself, was unacquainted with the final decision when Colo. D—— left this City. The truth is, I never was more embarrassed in any appointt—& the object of my conversation with the latter was to learn the public sentiment as far as it could be obtained from him, with respect to this matter; And to questions of this tendency he said he had heard Morgan, Scott and yourself mentioned on his Journey through, and from Kentucky to his own house—&, if I understood the significancy of things not expressed he compd himself—I took an occasion then, to observe, that I conceived few men were better qualified for such a command than you were & asked if he thought your junr Rank in the late Army would be an objection with those who had been your Seniors in it to serve under you—his reply (when a little pushed by bringing the case home to himself for I wanted to draw an explicit declaration from him) was, that he believed it would be an unpleasant, or agrating thing or words to that effect—but the manner, more than the expression throughout the whole of the conver[satio]n which was after dinnr and when we were alone led me to conclude that it would not be relished by him. What his real intentions might be at that time—when he was speaking to G.K.—or lastly to you no one but himself is master of.
I have no hesitation in declaring to you that the biass of my inclination was strongly in your favor; but, that the result of my enquiries—direct & indirect—of Military, and indeed of other characters (who were well disposed to see you in nomination) was, that if you were appointed to the Command it would be vain to look for Senior Officers to act subordinately; or if they consented, it would be so grudgingly as, more than probably, the seeds of Sedition would be coeval with the formation of the Army; such being the nature of Military pride. Admitting this then One of two things would inevitably have followd either—an army composed of discontented materials, or of junr characters, the first might be attended with fatal consequences—the other (however excellent the Officers might be) if any disaster shoud befal the [army] it would instantly be asscribed to the inexperience of the principal Officers in stations to which they had never been accustomed; thereby drawing a weight upon my shoulders too heavy to be borne. This was my own view of the

subject; & the principle upon which I acted not, be assured, because G.K. was of this, or of that opinion. The fact, I sincerely believe is, that he was as much puzzled as I was, to fix on the first Officer, under the circumstances that existed.
How far the appointment of G[eneral] W[ayne] is a popular, or an unpopular measure is not for me to decide. It was not the determination of a moment, nor was it the effect of partiality or of influence; for no application (if that in any instance could have warped my judgment) was ever made in his behalf from any one who could have thrown the weight of a feather into his scale but because, under a full view of all circumstances he appeared most eligable—To a person of your observation & intelligence, it is unnecessary to remark that an appointment which may be unpopular in one place, or with one set of men, may not be so in another place or with another set of Men and vice versa—and that to attempt to please every body is the sure way to please nobody—of course the attempt would be as idle as the executn wd be impracticable—G.W. has many good points as an Officer—and it is to be hoped that time, Reflection, good advice and above all, a due sence of the importance of the trust which is committed to him, will correct his foibles, or cast a shade over them. With estm & Regd I am &ca

G. W——n


Title: From George Washington to John Francis Mercer, 30 June 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Mercer, John Francis

Sir,
Philadelphia June 30th 1792.

I little expected that I should have had occasion, at this time (after the pointed assurances you gave me more than three years ago, of discharging what was due to me, fully) to remind you that I have received only Three hundred and eighty pds of the balance; and to ask what I am to expect from you in future.
I delayed from day to day while you were in this City (until it was too late) to apply to you on this Subject, in hope, and expectation that you would not have left town without mentioning it yourself.
Before I apply to the Executors of Colonels Tayloe & Thornton who were Securities for the money loaned to your deceased father, John Mercer Esqr., I will await the Receipt of your answer to this letter which I hope will be given as soon [as] you can make it convenient.
It has been of little avail hitherto, to inform you of the causes of my want of this money; although, in more instances than one, I have done it with the utmost truth and candour: nor should I say any thing further to you on this head now, were I not in a manner compelled to declare, that from an occurrence which did not exist before I have a call upon me for a considerable Sum, in a few months; against which it is indispensably necessary that I should be provided. I am—Sir Your Most Obedt Servt

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to John Greenwood, 1 July 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Greenwood, John

Sir,
Philadelphia July 1st 1792.

Your letter of the first of May and the box which accompanied it came safe, and duly to hand on the eve of my departure for Virginia; which is the reason why I have not acknowledged the Receipt of them sooner.
The contents of the latter (with the alterations which were necessarily made) answered very well—and enclosed you have, in Bank notes, twenty dollars, the sum I have usually sent you, but if it is insufficient let me know it and more shall be forwarded by Sir Yr Obedt Hble Servt

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to Anthony Whitting, 1 July 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Whitting, Anthony

Mr Whiting,
Philadelphia July 1st 1792.

Your letter of the 24th Ulto came duly to hand, and I am glad to find by it that you have had some rains though not as much as has fallen in these parts—and that your Crops are deriving the benefit of them. If the Corn is standing, & alive, I do not, on account of its backwardness, despair of a Crop; if you are able to keep it clean, & the ground well pulverised; which I hope will be the case.
It is much my wish that the swamps at both places may be got fully into Corn; if for no other reason than that of working the grd to destroy the wild growth, to pulverize, and to level it. I wish also that No. 2 at Dogue Run may have all the missing hills of both Corn & Potatoes made good; the first with early Corn, and the latter with any kind of Potatoes you may have, or can get. Without this I shall not ascertain a fact I was very desirous of knowing.
I am very glad to receive so favorable an Account of your Wheaten prospect, although it be touched with the Rust, and not filled so well as might be wished: and I am much pleased at your beginning harvest so soon, notwithstanding the prognostic’s of the Farmers around you—I am satisfied there is more utility, & less danger & loss in doing it, than if it had been delayed until their ideas had made it fit for the scythe or Sickle.
In my last I suggested to you a wish that the Brickyard inclosure might be sown with Buck-wheat & grass seeds; and these wishes are not changed. If the Buckwheat will not kill the grass that is sown with it, it will certainly shade, protect & keep it moist at a time when the hot Sun would be very apt to injure it—Turnips in my opinion will not answer well in that ground—first because they will not come off in time for fall sowing of the grass—and secondly, because they are considered as a very exhausting Crop when they are not fed off.
I expect, if nothing happens more than I know of at present, to set out for Mount Vernon about the twelfth of this month: previous to my arrival, I desire you will have the Well by the Kitchen thoroughly cleaned, by some professional people; and while they are about it that they may be well attended, as you

know accidents frequently happen in this work, by the noxtious effluvia that sometimes arise in these places; I would not have any of my own people descend into it: The same persons, or some other skilful ones might be employed to sink the Well directly opposite to the centre of the green house, but just within the Brick yard Inclosure So as not to interfere with the Road. This well is to be walled with the Bricks that are making, and which ought to be exceedingly well burnt—& none used for that purpose that are not so—The diameter after it is walled should be, in the clear, five feet; for the purpose of admitting a frame at the bottom that is necessary for a new mode of drawing Water—but if the Well could be sunk I would not have it Walled up (for the reason above) until I arrive. It will take about 200 bricks for every foot the Well is deep, & not less than 60 feet depth ought to be calculated upon; this would require 12,000 hard bricks; and to obtain them 15,000 ought to be made, and so disposed of in the kiln as to insure their being well burnt—about 50,000 of the common Bricks will be sufficient for the purposes for which they are intended.
The Ferry and French’s Plantations were not noticed in the last weeks Report. I am—Your friend &ca

Go: Washington


Title: To George Washington from Alexander Hamilton, 2 July 1792
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

 [Philadelphia] 2 July 1792. Encloses “the sketch of a letter to be written by Mr Lear to Mr Langdon.”


Title: To George Washington from Henry Knox, 2 July 1792
From: Knox, Henry
To: Washington, George

Sir
War department 2 July 1792

I have the honor respectfully to submit to your consideration certain principles for the formation of the four sub Legions, and for the arrangeme⟨nt⟩ of the commissioned officers thereof.
And also in case of a reduction of any of the new troops that the officers should be reduced by Lot. I have the honor sir to be with perfect respect Your humble Servant

H. Knox


Title: To George Washington from Thomas Jefferson, 3 July 1792
From: Jefferson, Thomas
To: Washington, George

 [Philadelphia] 3 July 1792. Submits “the translation of a letter from Messrs Viar & Jaudenes, with the draught of an answer he proposes to them, & a letter to the Governor of Georgia. he incloses also a translation of the papers which accompanied the letter he received.”


Title: To George Washington from Thomas Jefferson, 3 July 1792
From: Jefferson, Thomas
To: Washington, George

 [Philadelphia] 3 July 1792. Encloses “to the President a letter just recd from Colo. Humphreys.”


Title: To George Washington from Thomas Jefferson, 3 July 1792
From: Jefferson, Thomas
To: Washington, George

 [Philadelphia] 3 July 1792. Submits “to the President a letter to mister Van Berckel on the subject of the infraction of the privileges of his house by a constable.”


Title: From George Washington to Henry Lee, 3 July 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Lee, Henry

Dear Sir,
Philadelphia July 3d 1792.

Your letter of the 20th Ulto was presented to me yesterday by Mr Williams—who as a professional man—may, or may not be for ought I know, a luminary of the first magnitude. But to be frank, and I hope you will not be displeased with me for being so—I am so heartily tired of the attendance which from one cause or another has been given ⟨to⟩ these kind of people, that it is now more than two years since I have resolved to sit no more for any of them and have adhered to it, except in instances where it has been requested by public bodies, or for a particular purpose (not of the Painters) and could not, without offence be refused.
I have been led to make this resolution for another reason besides the irksomeness of sitting, and the time I loose by it—which is, that these productions have in my estimation, been

made use of as a sort of tax on individuals by being engraved (and that badly) and hawked about or advertised for Sale. With very great esteem & regard I am Dear Sir Yr most Obt & Affe Servt

G.W——n


Title: To George Washington from William Carter, Sr., 4 July 1792
From: Carter, William Sr.
To: Washington, George

Sir.
[Richmond, 4 July 1792]

William Wray, a Youth of a Reputable Family, & a Nephew of mine by Marriage, having lived with me from August 1784. in Order to study Physick & Surgery, is now very desirous of entering into the Army with a View of serving his Country & improving himself in the practical Part of his Profession & wishes to be appointed a Mate under a Surgeon for that Purpose; But in Case there is no Vacancy for him in his proper Line He is desirous of being favoured with some Commission: As I wish to be his Friend as far as lies in my Power to get him into the Army, where I have Reason to think from his Assiduity to Business & Attention to his Duty he may merit Preferment—He the said Will: Wray is young & healthy, of good natural Parts, & having given him a good Education: I do hereby certify that I think him capable & qualified for the above Purposes: And do now recommend him

to the Favour and Freindship of your Excellency—Given under my Hand this 4th Day of July 1792.

William Carter seniorAt Richmond—And Surgeon to theContinental Hospistal in Williamsburgduring the late War

P.S. Sir By my Desire Colo. Carrington enclosed a Copy of the above in a Letter to General Knox five or six Weeks ago: But having received no Appointment, nor the least Inteligence of any Kind from the General, He (William Wray), is very unhappy indeed. And as he is so very desirous of getting some Commission in the Army I make free to address You on the Subject in his Behalf. I am, Sir, with all due Respect & Esteem your most obedient and very humble Servant

William Carter senr


Title: To George Washington from Thomas Jefferson, 5 July 1792
From: Jefferson, Thomas
To: Washington, George

 [Philadelphia] 5 July 1792. Encloses “a letter just recieved from mister Hammond, which will be difficult to answer properly.”


Title: Henry Knox to Tobias Lear, 5 July 1792
From: Knox, Henry
To: Lear, Tobias

 [Philadelphia] 5 July 1792. Asks Lear to submit “the enclosed important papers from Mr Seagrovet” to GW.


Title: To George Washington from James Seagrove, 5 July 1792
From: Seagrove, James
To: Washington, George

Sir
Rocklanding Oconee River [Ga.] July 5 1792

The information, which I am about to give appearing to me of importance to the United States, I hope will plead my excuse for thus intruding on your moments of retirement.
In my dispatch of the 14th Ulto to the Secretary of War I promised to procure what information I could respecting a Spanish Officer which General McGillivray mentions in his letter to me of the 18th of May, a Copy of which you have herewith.
I find, on enquirey of the Indian Chiefs now with me, that this Spanish Officer is the same person that I have mentioned in my former letters as a Spanish resident or Agent, who had arrived from New Orleans and lived in a House of General McGillivray’s at little Tallassie.
It remains no longer a doubt who this person is, and his business in the Creek Nation. His name is Olivar a Frenchman born a Captain in the Spanish Army, wears the Uniform of the Regiment of Leuiseana, sent by the immediate orders of the Barron Caron du Lette, Governor of New Orleans, as an Agent (or perhaps something more) to conduct affairs in the Creek Nation.
It would appear by the Stile of General McGillivrays letter to me, that this Spanish Agent had just arrived and that he was a Stranger to him or his business, this was not the case, for it is well

known and I can produce unquestionable proofs that he had then been several months at McGillivrays own house at little Tallassie. the general took much pains in sending for a number of Chiefs and introduced this Spaniard to them as their great friend who was come to live among them, and to do great things for them. It can also be made appear that the general was riding about the Country with this Spaniard at the time when By his engagements he ought to have been with me.
I have not a doubt but that the arrival of this Spanish Agent was in Consequence of a preconcerted plan between McGillivray and the Spaniards on his visit last winter to their possessions and that Captain Olivar, is to be his successor in the Creek land. For you must know that the general is again gone with nearly the whole of his property into New Orleans, and I doubt whether he returns, certain it is that he hath engaged to attend the Spanish treaty, with the Indians at Pensacola in September next.
As soon as General McGillivray quit the nation Captain Olivar, threw of[f] all Mask, by calling meetings in the Towns, and directing what the Indians should, and should not do. He in the most public and positive manner forbids them parting with a foot of land to the United States, and also forbids their running the boundary line between them & Georgia, and positively tells the Indians not to have any thing to do with the Americans, It is said by several persons (but I cannot vouch for the truth of it) that he has gone so far in the upper Towns as to advise the Indians turning out against our people on the Western Waters, I think this not improbable, for about ten days past he had the impudence to come into the lower Towns, and give out public Talks, advising the Indians not to come near me, & on no account to run the line. This I have from persons who were present & heard him. I am happy in being able to inform you that he met a very cool receiption in the lower Towns. The Indians who had been with me had returned home and influenced their people so much in our favor that he found it convenient to make a speedy retreat to little Tallassie.
A Brother in law of general McGillivrays (a white man) who lives at Tallassie, of the name of Weatherford, is now here who confirms what I have related of this Spanish Agent, & further says that he hath at McGillivrays house a quantity of Goods,

which he distributes among the Indians—that he draws orders on Government in favor of all Indians going to Orleans, who received goods and Ammunition, which they bring up in boats and that they have a Constant intercourse in this way—that he has engaged in securing the Chiefs to attend the Treaty at Pensacola, that it was much talked of in the nation that one object of the Spanish Treaty would be to obtain leave to erect Forts and establish garrisons on the Creek lands.
Those matters seem of so much moment—come so direct, and I beleive unquestionably true, that I have lost no time in giving you notice thereof.
I cannot account for this interferrence of the spaniards I some times think that Captain Olivar, cannot be supported by his Government in such doings, and that he is exceeding his instructions.
By the Secretary of Wars dispatch to me of the 30th of April, it would appear that a good understanding exists between the United States and Spain.
In consequence of the secretary of Wars directions in the dispatch alluded to above—I wrote a line to the Governor of St Augustine in order to feel his pulse on the occasion, as well as to know from him, what they had done with Bowles, a Copy of our correspondance you have herewith.
My communications to the Secretary of War of the 24th May together with my letter to General McGillivray of the 21st of the same month, and my talks to the Indians, I must pray your perusal of.
I find that the Spanish Agent is on very friendly terms with Bowles successor in the Nation, a Man of the name of Wellbanks.
I cannot help expressing my fears to you, that the Spaniards are playing a double game with us on the score of Mr Bowles, My Opinion is, that they will make him useful to their views, their very kind treatment of him, since he has been among them, cannot fail to create suspicion in the breast of any one as well acquainted as I am with Spanish want of linity to actual prisoners especially such as have offended against their government. Bowles hath not been confined by them, and it is a doubt with me, but what appeared a capture of him to us, was in fact a concerted plan with him, He is sent to spain but not in confinement, why send him there—sure the Governor of New Orleans or the

Captain general at the Havana, are possessed with powers equal to punishing or acquiring a Man of Mr Bowles character. I fear there is some dark & dangerous business in contemplation among those people. I fear General McGillivray is not faithful to the United States, and I have my su[s]picions that if any mischief is abruing he is deeply engaged in it, I never expect he will come forward as an active character in the field, he wants spirit, and this is the reason of his placing Olivar, in his stead, and of his withdrawing to the Spaniards as an asslum, Olivar is represented to me as a Man of good address, who speaks the French, Spanish and English languages equally well.
I fear the reason of McGillivrays not meeting me, and his not forwarding the business of the Treaty made at New York, as well as his evasive conduct to all the pressing arguments made use of to him by the Secretary of War, and myself arrose from preconcerted plans with his Spanish and English friends, and not from any real opposition the Indians made thereto.
Agreeable to my instructions I have laboured very hard to replace this ungreatful Man in the confidence of his countrymen, which he had lost from his duplicity, and want of resolution, I fear I shall be censured by the Indians who are our friends for my Zeal in his behalf, I assure you that nine out of ten of them now dispise him and seldom mention his name but with disrespect.
I concieved it my duty to have Major Call, the commander of the Federal troops, & Mr Ellicott the surveyor present at my communications with the Indians in order that they might witness the situation of Matters and act accordingly.
It is truly disagreeable to me but duty to you impells me to mention, that this once valuable Officer hath resigned himself to so continual a state of intoxication with strong liquors, as to render him totally incapable of acting or even judging of what is proper in the line of his duty[.] I have already hinted this to the Secretary of War and referred him to the Officers who went from this for further information.
Notwithstanding the untoward State the Creek nation is represented to be in by General McGillivray I think I can venture to assure you, that I shall be able to keep them from breaking with us, if not restore them to order and get all matters settled with them. I hope you will see the necessity of my having it in my

power to supply them occasionally. you are too well acquainted with the nature of Indians for me to say more to you on this head as well as the precarious situation of those people at present.
In the execution of these as well as in any other matters you are pleased to commit to my care I can only say that fidelity & industry in me Shall not be wanting.
I have left open the Secretary of Wars dispatches for your persual, Should any thing further offer of consequence I shall forward it by express. I have the honor to be &c.

James Seagrove


Title: To George Washington from Thomas Jefferson, 6 July 1792
From: Jefferson, Thomas
To: Washington, George

 [Philadelphia] 6 July 1792. Submits to GW the draft of a letter from Jefferson to George Hammond.


Title: To George Washington from Winthrop Sargent, 6 July 1792
From: Sargent, Winthrop
To: Washington, George

Sir,
Cincinnati County of Hamilton and Territory of theUnited States North west of the River Ohio.July the 6th 1792.

I do myself the honour to transmit by Major Vigo, a copy from the public records of the Territory of the United States, north west of the river Ohio, to the 30th of June inclusive.
The long absence of two of the judges from the Government, has prevented the adoption of laws for more than the six months last past, which is considered and lamented as a very great misfortune to the territory.
Since closing my official communications sir, Major Vigo has

presented to me the enclosed petition from the people of Vincennes which I beg leave to lay before Congress.
Observing that the petitioners are generally in very indigent circumstances—much attached to the United States, and that the whole expense of resurveying their ancient possessions, will, by an estimate of the surveyor, amount to about one thousand dollars.
With every sentiment of the highest respect, I have the honour to be Sir, Your most obedient, and most devoted servant,

Winthrop Sargent


Title: To George Washington from Mason Locke Weems, 6 July 1792
From: Weems, Mason Locke
To: Washington, George

[6 July 1792]

Sensible that it ever affords a heartfelt pleasure to your Excellency to promote the happiness of Mankind, and knowing how

eminently Almighty God has put it into your power to Advance the Welfare of the Citizens of these States, I take the liberty of Solicting Your excellency’s Patronage to a Work which is evidently and most happily calculated to enlarge the Reign of Piety and Virtue among that Class of Citizens (I mean the Great) whose Examples have the weightiest Influence on the Manners of the Community. I am endeavoring to give the Public, a large Edition of the Celebrated Doctor Blair’s Sermons, in which, Just Sentiments, a Glowing Piety, and Amiable Affections are set forth in such Elegant & harmonious Language as to be read with considerable Avidity by those very Persons who woud reject Other Discourses of equal Piety but unhappily destitute of their external Grace and Ornament. It was suggested to me that were your excellency & Some Other Leading Characters in Philadelphia to Shew a good will to this Work it might greatly Augment & Accelerate its Progress. I brought Letters to his Excellency the Governor, to Mr Morris Mr Barclay &c. &c. Some I have presented. Mr Morris not only patroniz’d by Subscription, but Voluntarily Offerd his Interest with his Friends—had Doctor Wm Smith or the British Consul been at home, Shd perhaps been introduced to your Excellency, as I happen to be related to those Gentlemen. Tho’ I was once introduced to your Excellency by Doctor Craik. Shoud your Excellency think well to patronize & encourage this extensively Diffusive way of propogating these Valuable Discourses You will find that Mr Morris has left a Chasm Just above his Signature and for that purpose, I told Mr Morris that Doctor Craik had introduced me to your Excellency some Years ago at M. Vernon. he Observd “it was unnecessary to get any further introduction.” With Sentiments of the highest Veneration I remain Your excellency’s Friend & Well Wisher

Mason L. Weems.


Title: From George Washington to Thomas Jefferson, 7 July 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Jefferson, Thomas

Saturday [7 July 1792]

Pray send me Mr Hammond’s communications to you on thursday & your letter to him in answer; and let me see you at Eight ’Oclock this Morng. Yrs

G.W.


Title: To George Washington from John Kean, 7 July 1792
From: Kean, John
To: Washington, George

Sir
Philadelphia July 7th 1792.

The Commission with which I have this day been honored is a mark of your approbation highly grateful to me—I shall endeavour by my actions to merit & preserve it.
My present occupation will not permit me to appropriate to the expediting this business so much of my time as I could wish & the nature of the service may require; but no exertion shall be wanting on my part so far as my time will allow to facilitate the exertions of my Colleagues to bring the business to as speedy a conclusion as the nature of the case will admit of. With sentiments

of the most exalted esteem I have the honor to be sir Yr Obt Servt

John Kean


Title: To George Washington from George Augustine Washington, 7 July 1792
From: Washington, George Augustine
To: Washington, George

Honor’d Uncle
Sulpher Springs Berkley County [Va.]10 Miles from my FathersJuly 7th 1792

I wrote You the 24th Ulto that I had contrary to my fixed resolution of returning to my Mount Vernon in a fortnight been tempted to procrastinate the time—from the flattering hope of benefiting my health, which is really so precarious that I am at a loss what to say about it—I am some times for three or four days tantalized with a belief that I am geting better but by the slightest cold (which with all the prudence I can use am very subject to) my indisposition is increasd—not experiencing that advantage which I had flatterd myself with and anxiously wishing to return I had determind t⟨o⟩ do it but have been over rooled by the advise of a Physician in this County whose skill I have confidence in, to delay my return for a short time, and by the effects of this water which he doubted not I should find beneficial, as he did not think my disorder consumptive and if it was should the waters disagree with me I might desist in the use of it—my complaints are complicated, my head which is frequently and severely disorderd is I apprehend either rheumattic or nervous, for which complaints this spring has been found very advantages—I came here yesturday and unless I here some unfavorable

accounts from Mt Vernon (which I hope will not be the case) mean to continue a fortnight if I find I am like to benefit from it—I very reluctantly consente⟨d⟩ to a longer absence and nothing short of the desireable object I am in persuit of would tempt me—if I can only regain a tolerable share of health I promise myself much satisfaction from Yours and my Aunts return to Mt Vernon—No conveyance offering immediately to Philadelphia I forward this by a Gentleman to Frederick Town to be put in the Post Office at that place—I feel a constant concern for the health and happiness of Yourself my Aunt & the Children and believe me to be with the most unbounded attachment Your truely affectionate Nephew

Go. A. Washington

I beg my good wishes to be offerd to Mr & Mrs Lear the Gentlemen of Your family my Cousins Geo: & L: Washington.


Title: To George Washington from Alexander Hamilton, 8 July 1792
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Treasury Department July 8. 1792

The Secretary of the Treasury has the honor respectfully to submit to the President of the United States the inclosed Contract between the Superintendant of the Delaware Lighthouse &[c]a and Benjamin Rice, for the making of two Mooring chains for the use of the Beacon boats on the River Delaware, together with sundry papers relating thereto. The object appears to be a necessary one, & the terms comparatively good. The amount of the Expence will be Four hundred & twenty Dollars. All which is humbly submitted.

Alex. HamiltonSecy of the Treasury


Title: From George Washington to Thomas Jefferson, 9 July 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Jefferson, Thomas

[Philadelphia] July 9th 1792.

Pray draught a proper answer to the enclosed, approving of what the Director of the Mint has done, and is about to do; and requesting an estimate of the money which will be wanted to enable him to proceed in the business of Coining agreeably to what he proposes.

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to David Rittenhouse, 9 July 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Rittenhouse, David

United States of America [Philadelphia, 9 July 1792]

Having had under consideration the letter of the Director of the mint of this day’s date, I hereby declare my approbation of the purchase he has made of the house and lot for the mint. of the employment of mr Voight as Coiner, of the procuring fifteen tons of copper, & proceeding to coin the cents and half cents of

copper & dismes & half dismes of silver: and I leave to his discretion to have such alterations and additions made to the buildings purchased as he shall find necessary, satisfied that under his orders no expence will be incurred which reason & necessity will not justify: and I desire that he will make out an estimate of the sums of money which will be wanting for these purposes & of the times at which they will be wanting, in order to enable the treasury to make arrangements for furnishing them with convenience. given under my hand this 9th day of July 1792.


Title: From George Washington to David Stuart, 9 July 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Stuart, David

Dear Sir,
Philadelphia July 9th 1792.

Although I did not acknowledge the receipt of the letter you wrote to me some time ago respecting Bowl[e]s, I was not unmindful of the contents: but upon consulting some Professional Gentlemen I was informed that his being brother to the noted Bowls was not, without some overt act of his own, sufft to lay hold of him.
If nothing more happens than I am aware of at present, I shall leave this City on thursday, with Mrs Washington and the Children for Mount Vernon; and if the weather is tolerable, and ourselves and horses keep up, I shall be, I expect, at George town on Monday or tuesday of the week following.
I shall bring with me, or send on if I am likely to be delayed, the plans for the public buildings which were sent (I believe) by the Commissioners, to Mr Jefferson; but, if none more elegant

than these should appear on, or before the 16th instt the exhibition of Architecture will be a very dull one indeed. My best wishes to Mrs Stuart & the family—& I am—Dear Sir Yr Obedt & Affecte Hble Servt

G.W——n


Title: From George Washington to Alexander Hamilton, 10 July 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[Philadelphia] 10th July 1792.

Estimate of immediate Expenditures for the Mint.

Dollars.

Price of the House & Lot, to be paid on executing the Conveyance
4266.2/3

15 Tons of Copper, suppose 16 Cents ⅌ lb.
4800.

Repairs of the Buildings, Workmen’s wages &c.
   933.1/3

Dollars
10,000.

David Rittenhouse

United States [Philadelphia] 10th July 1792
The Secretary of the Treasury will cause to be paid to the Director of the Mint, Ten thousand Dollars for the purposes above specified.

G: Washington


Title: Tobias Lear to Henry Knox, 10 July 1792
From: Lear, Tobias
To: Knox, Henry

United States [Philadelphia] July 10th 1792

By the President’s command T. Lear has the honor to return to the Secretary of War the enclosed letters from Governors Lee & Telfair which have been submitted to the President, and to inform the Secretary that the President requests that any answer to these letters which may require his inspection, may be submitted to him by twelve o’clock tomorrow, as he intends setting out for Virginia in the afternoon.

Tobias LearSecretary to the President of the United States.


Title: To George Washington from John Francis Mercer, 10 July 1792 [letter not found]
From: Mercer, John Francis
To: Washington, George

Letter not found: from John Francis Mercer, 10 July 1792. In his letter to Mercer of 23 July, GW referred to “Your favor of the 10th.”


Title: To George Washington from Alexander Spotswood, 10 July 1792 [letter not found]
From: Spotswood, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Letter not found: from Alexander Spotswood, 10 July 1792. On 23 July, GW wrote Spotswood a letter in which he mentioned “your favor of the 10th.”


Title: To George Washington from Thomas Jefferson, 11 July 1792
From: Jefferson, Thomas
To: Washington, George

[Philadelphia, 11 July 1792]

Th: Jefferson with his respects to the President sends him a letter to received by which he will perceive that mister Blodget has deposited with the two Boston banks 10,000 Doll. subject to the draught of the Commissioners.
also two proof sheets of the city: recd from Boston.


Title: Tobias Lear to Thomas Jefferson, 11 July 1792
From: Lear, Tobias
To: Jefferson, Thomas

[Philadelphia] July 11t[h] 1792

The President of the U.S. informs the Secretary of State that he has retained one of the proof Sheets of the federal City, and returns the others with the letter from Mr Blodget, which the President thinks had better be sent to the Commissioners by the mail, which will certainly reach G. Town on Monday. The President’s Cavalry are in such order that he cannot say with any precision when he shall reach that place; he however, wishes the Secretary to mention to the Commissioners that he sat out this afternoon; but being incumbered with lame and sick horses it is uncertain when he will be at George-Town.
The President observes that the soundings of the River & Branch are not noted either in this or the other proof sheet, which he thinks would be very satisfactory & advantageous to have done.


Title: From George Washington to James McHenry, 11 July 1792 [letter not found]
From: Washington, George
To: McHenry, James

 Letter not found: to James McHenry, c.11 July 1792. McHenry wrote GW on 17 July that he had received GW’s letter, noting: “It has the Philadelphia post mark of the 11th.”


Title: To George Washington from John Churchman, 14 July 1792
From: Churchman, John
To: Washington, George

Bank Street Baltimore July 14th 1792.

J. Churchman presents his compliments to the President of the united States, having lately received several Letters from Baron Vall-Travers, in which one is mentioned to be sent by Captain Folgier, which has not come to hand, Understanding that Captain Folgier delivered some Letters last Spring to the President from the Baron, J.C. would be very glad to know, in anyway the least troublesome, whether any one came for him at that time, he could never think of troubling the President on this occasi⟨on⟩ if the Baron had not heretofore written to him under cover directed to the Presiden⟨t⟩ he begs leave to add that he informed Vall-Travers what he had in charge.


Title: To George Washington from Henry Knox, 14 July 1792
From: Knox, Henry
To: Washington, George

Sir
War Department, July 14th 1792.

The last post which left Pittsburgh on the 6th instant, brings information of entire tranquility on the frontiers.
General Wayne has desired to know what conduct he is to pursue relative to the Small pox—that disorder being at Pittsburgh.

I have informed him that it would be improper to innoculate at this time as well on account of the warm season of the year, as the crisis of affairs.
The Returns of additional Recruits are enclosed. I have the honor to be with the most perfect Respect Your hume servant

H. Knox


Title: To George Washington from Tobias Lear, 15 July 1792
From: Lear, Tobias
To: Washington, George

Sir,
New York July 15th 1792

I have the honor to inform you that we arrivd here last evening after a pleasant journey from Phila. and shall sail for Providence in about an hour. I have thought it best, & upon the whole most œconomical to take a water carriage to Providence.
The principal object in troubling you with a letter at this time is to mention that while I was on board the Packet this morning engaging a passage I met with Colo. Stevens of this place & in the course of conversation upon general subjects he made enquiry respecting the federal City, and from thence took occasion to observe that he had been applied to to superinte[n]d the new manufacturing town to be built in Jersey, but he did not think the compensation offered (2000 dols./ per Annum) a sufficient object to induce him to leave his business in this place; and at the same time observed that a business of this kind was peculiarly suited to his genius & inclination & that he should not have hesitated one moment about accepting the offer made him if the compensation p⟨mutilated⟩ equalled his p[r]esent business. He asked if a person was engaged to superintend the public works to be carried on at the city, in the place of Major L’Enfant, I told him I did not know of any one who was absolutely engaged.
I have just mentioned this conversation, Sir, that if a person of

Colo. Stevens’ character shoud be wanted for the purpose of superintending the works at the City, your thoughts might thereby be called to him, as otherwise he might not occur—His fitness you are able to judge of from your Knowledge of him during the war.
Mrs Lear & our little boy are in good health and unite with me in respec[t], gratitude, and Sincere prayers for the health & happines of yourself, Mrs Washington & the family. With truth & sincerity I have the honor to be Sir Your most obedt & grateful Servt

Tobias Lear.


Title: To George Washington from Edward Newenham, 15 July 1792
From: Newenham, Edward
To: Washington, George

Dear Sir,
Bellchampe [Ireland] 15 July 1792

Permit me, in the warmest manner, to Introduce to yr Excellency, Mr Anderson, who, together with all his Family have been my most Zealous friends upon all occasions.
Encouraged by the rising Prosperity of the United States, joined with the Principles of its Government, he has turned a good part of his Property into ready money, & intends to settle, with his Children, in some one of the States; he goes first to Philadelphia,

& will there have the Honor of paying you his respects, in order personaly to see the MAN, whom he always admired.
He is not fixed, whether he will enter into the Mercantile Line, or become a purchaser of Land; that depends on the advice he gets; he has neither Connections or Acquaintance in America, & Since, the Death of my Ever respected & Dear Freind Doctor Franklin, I have none, but your Excellencey to recommend him to, which I take the Liberty of doing it—He is of a respectable Private Family here & has always maintaind the best of Characters.
Lady Newenham joins me in Sincere Respects, & fervent wishes for yours & Mrs Washingtons health & happiness. I have the Honor, to be, with perfect Respect & Esteem your Excellencys most obt & most Hble Servt

Edward Newenham


Title: To George Washington from Giuseppe Ceracchi, 16 July 1792
From: Ceracchi, Giuseppe
To: Washington, George

Sir
Amsterdam 16 July 1792

No man is happier then I’m in this moment, for I rely feel a tru satisfactory honor in addressing the President of the Unit. Stat’s.
I shall communicate this sensetion to my Cildren, they shall learn to pronounce General Washingtons’ name with the highst admiration, and shall, inspire the desire to addresse personaly the Hero of America universily admired trowout the world.
My worth being to little, I have nothing to offer but the greatfull sentiments end veneretion with which I’m Sir your most obt end most Humble Servt

Joseph Ceracchi


Title: To George Washington from Thomas Chittenden, 16 July 1792
From: Chittenden, Thomas
To: Washington, George

Sir,
Vermont Williston July 16th 1792

Before this time I conclude you have recived my Letter of the 16th of June Incloling Sundry affidavits relaletive to the abuses lately offred this as well as the united Stats by the officers & Soldiers Stationed at Point au farr togeather with a Copy of my Letter to Leiut. Governor Clarke upon the Subject.
I now have the Honor to Transmit to your Excellency a Copy of Governor Clarke’s answer to me I shall make no Commints upon the equivocal and evasive manner in which it is written.
as I was Sensible that the Conduct of this garrison might Involve questions of national Importance and desarve a national discursion I took the earliest oppertunity of transmiting to your Excellency the Information I had recived upon the Subject, but as the Injury was more immediately felt by the Citizens of this State I Consider my Self Justifiable in requsting of the Commanding officer at Quebec an Explanation of So new and unprecedented abuses from that Quarter Imprest with the Idea that what had been don was without his order or approbation. I Submit to your Excellency how fair I have acted prudant in this Bisness or what futher or differant measures I Should have taken.
I thint it my duty further to observe that Alburgh is a tongue of land Seperate from the main land Canted Point a fer by the waters of Lake Champlain. Containing abought Sixteen Thousand acres and is from three to Ten mils distant from the garrison it contains between Sixty & Seventy heads of famileys Including abought five Hundred Souls.
A part of the Settlers possessed the Land as an old french Seignory the other part as a grant under the authority of the State of Vermont. the formor Settlers finding their Title Invalid and wishing to avail themselvs of a Title under Vermont in order to Secure to them Selvs the reward of their toils Assimbled with the other Inhabitance and Easily in the munth of June organized as

a Town agreeably to the Laws of this State and took the Necessary oaths to Intitle them Selvs to the privilege of free men and citizenship, within this State—and are—(a few only excepted) Solicitous not only to be protected but Governed by the Laws of this & the united Stats at the Last Session of the legislature in this State Two Justises ware appointed residunt at Alburgh who ware Soon after Sworn in to office. previos to their appointment the Inhabitance had not been the Subjects of any civil Government but the place had been too much a randizvous for outlaws and fugitives from Justice as their views are now meritorious it is to be hoped that every attempt to defeat them will meet its deserved recompence. I have the Honour to be your Excellencys very Hbl. Servt

T.C.


Title: To George Washington from Alexander Hamilton, 16 July 1792
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Sir,
Philadelphia July 16. 1792.

I have the honor to enclose a Resolution of the Commissioners of the Sinking Fund of the 16th inst:, for your consideration and approbation.
My absence from Town and hurry after my return, prevented the making of the arrangement before you left this place. I shall hope to receive your determination previous to the day which limits the receiving of proposals, as the purchases must be made within the month. Nothing else new has occurred since your departure.
With perfect respect & the truest attachment, I have the honor to be &c.

A: Hamilton.


Title: To George Washington from James Gibbon, 17 July 1792
From: Gibbon, James
To: Washington, George

Sir
Petersburg, Virga July 17th 1792

Coll Carrington as Supervisor of the district of Virginia having been obliging enough to suggest to me the resignation of Coll Newton as Inspector of the th4 Suvey and that twas his intention to recommend me to succeed him—I have taken the liberty, in aid of his good offices in my behalf to trouble you with my own application[.] Having already acted under the Supervisors orders it is left for him to say how far I may be Entitled to yr favour in this case.
The office of Surveyor of the port I have held with a hope that some compensation adequate to its duties wou’d have offerd in ⟨illegible⟩ tho I’ve heretofore been disappointed in this I’m not altogether without hope that a proper representation will yet effect it.
As the duties of Inspector of the th4 Suvey and that of Surveyor of the customs are in a great degree combin’d and I belive in no instance incompatible so I shall feel myself happy if you Sir shou’d think proper to combine them in the instance of him who is with very great respect Yr Oblig’d Humb. Servt

J. Gibbon


Title: From George Washington to Thomas Jefferson, 17 July 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Jefferson, Thomas

Dear Sir
George Town July 17th 1792

I am extremely sorry to find by the enclosed letter that the affairs of France put on so disagreeable an aspect.
As I know it is your intention to proceed immediately on, I will not ask you to call at Mt Vernon now but hope it is unnecessary to say that I shall be glad to see you on your way going or Returning. I am sincerely & Affecy Yrs

Go: Washington


Title: To George Washington from Carl Heinrich Kreppelin, 17 July 1792
From: Kreppelin, Carl Heinrich
To: Washington, George

 Amsterdam, 17 July 1792. Encloses a letter from Professor Kilsberger of Mainz, who wishes GW to send him news of his brother through Kreppelin.


Title: To George Washington from James McHenry, 17 July 1792
From: McHenry, James
To: Washington, George

Sir.
Fayetteville [Md.] 17 July 1792.

The letter you did me the honor to write which I had not received when I had the honor to see you was handed me the day after. It has the Philadelphia post mark of the 11th and was they

tell me overlooked by the post-master here or rather his assistant when my letters were called for. I thought it proper to mention this particular to you that the cause of its detention might not be misunderstood.
I have now to request of my dear General, that he will on his return devote one day to Baltimore town, and that sometime before, you will be so kind as to let me know the day we may look for you. The merchants who have a sincere love and attachment for you wish very much to give you a public dinner, which might perhaps be contrived without occasioning much delay, if you could arrange your stages so as to reach us early in the forenoon.
Mrs McHenry begs to be presented to Mrs Washington. We both hope that the remainder of your journey was without accident and wish you that repose and happiness in your favorite Mount Vernon, to which you are so well intitled. I have the honor to be Sir, sincerely & affectionately Yours

James McHenry


Title: To George Washington from the Commissioners for the District of Columbia, 19 July 1792
From: Commissioners for the District of Columbia
To: Washington, George

sir
George-Town 19th July 1792

Yesterday the Commissrs Contracted with Mr Hoben for his services by the year at 300 Guineas, his Draft and Attention may, be confined to the Palace or extended to other objects they may chuse. Doctor Stewart’s uneasiness at the State of his Family occasioned his leaving us as soon as the most material of our Business was finished—This morning we went with Mr Hoben to the Seite of the Palace that he might lay out the foundation, the Plan, being much less than Majr L’Enfant’s Design will not fill up to the diverging Points marked by the Stakes—This will necessarily occassion a Division of the Excess, on the two sides, or to recede the whole distance on one only, it does not seem, to create so much Embarrasment as might be expected, but as the work may go on without any waste of Labour till you will be here again we have left the Choice open to be made by yourself, on the Spot—Hobens Affairs requires his absence about a Month his return is expected to be as soon as he will be much wanted—After Docter Stewart left us we received a Letter and Draft from Judge Turner, there is something in it striking and agreeable to us, we send it for your Consideration—Lamphier’s Plan is given up as impracticable, we have written to Ballet inviting him down to attempt Improvements, Mr Turners too seems very capable

of it—We still hope a little time may give you an Oppertunity of making a Choice to your Satisfaction—We are &c.

Th. Johnson
Danl Carroll


Title: From George Washington to John Lewis, 20 July 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Lewis, John

Dr Sir,
Mount Vernon 20th July 92

I was in hopes the letter wch was written to you at my request, by my Nepw G. A: Washington—dated the 25th of March—wd have rendered a further application from me to you, on that subjt unnecessary—but as he says, you have made no reply to it—as I Am informed that my power of attorney to you, was regularly recorded in Gates County No. Carolina & That Mr Cowper is making great improvement upon the land (which is an evidence that the bargain with him is closed & of course the money paid, as that was the condition of it) and, as you are upon the point of removing to Kentucky. I must, and do insist positively upon receiving my moiety of the money, which has been paid by Mr Cowper or any person in his behalf before you go—and to know how the ballance stands.
You must be sensible, Sir, it was my opinion at the time you proposed to make sale of this land that the moment was not favorable for it—but, as the Affairs of your fathers Estate pressed,

and my own want of money was great, I consented to its being done; but I cannot nor will not consent to lye out of my moiety of the Money that has been receid in payment. I am Dr Sir Yr obedt Hble Servt

G. W——n


Title: To George Washington from Tobias Lear, 21 July 1792
From: Lear, Tobias
To: Washington, George

Sir,
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, July 21st 1792.

I have the honor to inform you that we arrived here yesterday, and had the pleasure to find all our friends in good health. Our passage from New York to Providence was a very pleasant one,

and performed in about 36 hours. We met with no accident during the journey, and were highly favored in the weather.
Agreeably to your directions I called upon Mr Morris before I left Philadelphia, and observed to him, that as you understood the house in which you lived was only engaged for two years, which term would expire on the first day of October next, you had ordered me to see him upon the subject, and to learn from him whether he expected to remove into the house himself at the end of that time, or whether it was his intention that the President should occupy it until his present term of service expired. Mr Morris replied that no other idea had ever entered his mind, but that you should occupy the house as long as you might find it convenient or agreeable—that the reason of the term being limited to two years was from the full expectation that an house would, within that time, be provided by the State of Pennsylvania for the residence of the President; but as he found that the government house was not likely to be completed so soon as was expected, he was making alterations, for his better accommodation, in the house where he now lives. I further observed to him, that if he had any desire to return to his former dwelling, and the house which he now inhabits would be rented, you would readily give up the one which you now hold, and take the other; or if that was not to be rented, you would get the best accommodation you could elsewhere. He answered, that when the alterations now carrying on should be completed the house would be as convenient for him as the other, and even if that should not have been the case, he should never have entertained an idea of returning to his former residence so long as it might be agreeable to the President to occupy it.
As in the conversation with Mr Morris, I made use of the expression “until the President’s present term of service expires”—he asked me if it was expected that any other more suitable house would be provided by that time, as he was confident the goverment house would not then be fit to occupy. I told him I did not know that any other would be; but that you had no occasion to look forward beyond the time for which you were elected, for accommodations of this nature. He then asked me if you had determined not to continue at the head of the government after the expiration of the present term. I told him I did not know

that you had come to any determination on the subject; but that I knew full well if you followed your own wishes & inclination they would lead you to retire. He observed, that he knew himself that to be the case; but he hoped to God that the love of your Country & of mankind which had heretofore overcome in you every personal & private consideration, would still prevail, and that you would not give up the government & the Country to that fate which he clearly foresaw awaited them if you should determine to retire from the Chair. He thought the reasons for your continuing were, if possible, more strong than those which first induced your acceptance of the Office.
So far as I have had an opportunity of hearing any sentiment expressed on this subject it has uniformly agreed with the above. The rout by which I came hither and the little stop which I made in the several places th[r]ough which I passed afforded but little opportunity of hearing the opinion of many persons on this or other topics; but I found an eagerness of inquiry on this head, mixed with an apprehension of what might be the consequences of your retiring, which convinced me that it was considered as a matter of the first importance. The general idea seemed to be, to say nothing of the fatal effects expected from divisions & parties, that most of the important things hitherto done under this government, being, as it were, matters of experiment, had not yet been long enough in operation to give satisfactory proof whether they are beneficial or not, and that they could not under any other administration have the fair experiment which they would have under that which first introduced them.
I had the honor of writing a few lines from New York, and shall not fail to write as often as anything may occur worth giving you the trouble of perusing it.
I was a little surprized to find that the Indian War is extremely unpopular in New England. I have not heard it mentioned by a single person who did not consider it as arising rather from a wish on the part of the United States to obtain lands to which they have no just claim, than as a war of necessity, as it really is. Whenever I have heard this subject introduced I have not failed to set the matter in its true light, and I flatter myself that I have convinced those with whom I have conversed on this head that the U.S. neither want nor have ever claimed an inch of land from

the Indians which they have not obtained by fair treaty and honorable purchase. I was astonished to find that they had taken so little pains to make themselves masters of the subject before they condemned it—an idea had obtained that the war was unjust without any one having inquired into the matter far enough to give a single reason why it was unjust.
So far as I have had an opportunity of learning, I find the people this way very much in favor of the establishment of the Federal City. A report has been propagated, that it was on the decline & that some circumstances had retarded its progress and would probably totally defeat it; but I was pleased to find, that this report was very little regarded.
The crops of grain & grass are good, and the prospect of Indian Corn (which is 3 or 4 weeks more forward here than in Virginia) remarkably fine—The Country appears flourishing and the people prosperous & happy. In this town they are doing business to more advantage than they have ever done before since the revolution.
Mrs Lear & our little boy are well & less fatigued with the journy than could have been expected. Mrs Lear will have the honor of writing to Mrs Washington as soon as she gets a little settled from the confusion of the journey—and in the mean time she unites with me in sentiments of gratitude & respect for yourself & Mrs Washington, love to the Children & best regards to Major Washington & his lady and to Messrs Dandridge & Lewis.
With the most sincere & affectionate attachment & perfect respect I have the honor to be Sir Your most Obedient Servant

Tobias Lear.


Title: To George Washington from Reuben Rowzee, 22 July 1792
From: Rowzee, Reuben
To: Washington, George

Sir,
Winchester [Va.] 22d July 1792

The Petition, which I had the honor to transmit you, by Mr R. Lewis about this time last year, signed by many worthy Gentleman, in the vicinity where I resided, on the subject of my deplorable situation, has never yet been finally answered. The Gentleman who was pleased to convey the memorial to you has never yet had it in his power, I have learned, to afford me those Communications, which could only palliate the miseries I have so long suffered through the wicked artifices of a man who I wished to serve. I hope in Heaven by this time you have considered the documents which I took the Liberty to send you; and that I may as soon as public convenience, and private leisure, will permit, receive an answer that will be decisive. Believe me Sir, candid, when I declare, that I cannot satisfy the claim, or even a part of it, without being incapable of answering for a violence, to my pitiless family, before a just and almighty God, from whose mercy only, I look and hope for a glorious, and happy immortality. If I were a single man, I could not hesitate one moment to part with my little all, to satisfy the debt, but such has not been the will of providence, and even under my present woful circumstances, I derive happiness, on the occasional interviews, I have with my children, in the surly walls of a loathsome prison. In the Course of human affairs, my residence in this world can not be very long, and rather would I consume the remaining span of my day in Captive misery, than for my poor children after I am cold in the Ground, to be obliged to beg the little, which nature does want, from door to door. Pardon, good Sir, this warm l[ett]r, it is the overflowings of a heart, of an old grey headed, affectionate Father. I will only pray your answer, as soon, as your absence from the necessary avocations of busy life will admit, and when your private business may be not importunate for your attention. I am with submissive Respect, Sir, Yr mo: obt Hble: s⟨illegible⟩

Reuben Rowzee


Title: From George Washington to the Commissioners for the District of Columbia, 23 July 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Commissioners for the District of Columbia

Gentlemen,
Mount Vernon July 23d 179[2]

Your favor of the 19th, accompanying Judge Turner’s plan for a Capitol, I have duly received; and have no hesitation in declaring that I am more agreeably struck with the appearance of it than with any that has been presented to you. I return it without delay, because (among other reasons for doing it) Mr Turner wishes to receive it, in any event, immediately.
There is the same defect, however, in this plan as there is in all the plans which have been presented to you—namely—the want of an Executive apartment: wch ought, if possible, to be obtained. The Dome, which is suggested as an addition to the center of the edifice, would, in my opinion, give beauty & granduer to the pile; and might be useful for the reception of a Clock—Bell, &ca. The Pilastrade too, in my Judgement, ought (if the plan is adopted) to be carried around the simicircular projections at the ends; but whether it is necessary to have the elevation of the upper Storey 41 feet is questionable; unless it be to preserve exactness in the proportion of the several parts of the building; in that case, the smaller Rooms in that Storey would be elivated sufficiently if cut in two, & would be the better for it in the interior provided they can be lighted. This would add to the number of Committee Rooms of which there appears to be a dificiency: And quere, would not the section B in the North division of plan No. 2 be more usefully applied as a library than for the purpose it is designated?
Could such a plan as Judge Turner’s be surrounded with Columns, and a colonade like that which was presented to you by Monsr Hallet (the Roof of Hallet’s I must confess does not hit my taste)—without departing from the principles of Architecture—and would not be too expensive for our means, it would, in my judgement, be a noble & desireable Structure. But, I would have it understood in this instance, and always, when I am hazarding a sentiment on these buildings, that I profess to have no knowledge in Architecture, and think we should (to avoid criticisms)

be governed by the established Rules which are laid down by the professors of this Art.
I think you have engaged Mr Hoben upon advantageous terms; and hope if his industry and honesty are of a piece with the specimen he has given of his abilities, he will prove a useful man & a considerable acquisition. The enclosed Is handed to you, merely because it is my wish that you should be possessed of every information of the kind that comes to my knowledge. The person therein mentioned (Stevens) was a Lieutt Colonel of Artillery during the War, and was (and for aught I know to the contrary, is) a Sober, honest & good tempered man—Very industrious—Fertile in invention & resources—and great at execution. He was, as I have been informed, bred a house Carpenter; but how well acquainted he may be with that business, or how far he may be able to carry on work in a masterly manner upon a grand scale, I have no data to decide upon. He is a native of Boston, but since the War has lived in New York, where he carries on the business of a lumber Merchant to (I believe) a considerable extent. With great esteem & regard I remain Gentlemen Yr most Obedt Servt

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to Thomas Jefferson, 23 July 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Jefferson, Thomas

Dear Sir,
Mount Vernon July 23d 1792

The friday after you left this place I received the enclosed dispatches from Governor Chittendon, of the State of Vermont.
If you conceive it to be necessary, undr the circumstances which exist, to write again to that Gentleman before he replies to your former letter on the subject in dispute, you will, of course, take such measures thereupon as shall appear proper under a full view of all circumstances. With great esteem & regard I am—Dear Sir Your Obedt & Affecte Servt

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to John Francis Mercer, 23 July 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Mercer, John Francis

Sir,
Mount Vernon July 23d 1792

Your favor of the 10th did not get to my hands until Saturday last, although I sent to the Post Office regularly, every Post day since I came to this place for the lettrs wch I expected.
Your letter conveys no specific assurance of the time, or manner of discharging the bal[anc]e which is due to me. I am placed on no better, indeed on worse ground—than I stood years ago with respect to this debt; and you cannot have forgotten that these were my apprehensions, which I expressed to you upon more occasions than one. Why then should I be told at this late day after every endeavor on my part to accomodate matters to your convenience of your intention of offering all your property for sale when part of it ought to have been applied to my use years since? or to what purpose (for me I mean) is it that you should offer property for sale if the price set thereon will admit no purchasers, or if sold that the money is to be converted to other uses than for my benefit? The latter you must be sensible I know to have been the case and the other, as it respects negros which you offered to me formerly, & from other circumstances, I have no reason to disbelieve.
It is not from inclination, that I become acquainted with any Gentlemans circumstances, and far is it from my practice to investigate what he owes; but you must excuse me when I tell you, that I have heard enough of yours to give me some uneasiness, as well on your Acct as on mine. To two facts I shall glance. A Gentn in Phila., witht having the least Suspicion (I believe) how matters stood between you & me, was enquiring into the value of your Marlborough Estate; & through another channel I understd the reason was, that your debt to him was considerable; &

that, that was the mean by which he was to be securd. The other, is the Agency of Mr Montague who I know is determined to push the settlement of that business. Others I have also heard of: but nothing, I beg you to be persuaded, Sir, but my own interest in the case, would have induced me to mention them to you. Hard indeed then would it be upon me if after twenty odd years endulgence & receiving any thing, and driblets as they were offered which dissipated (being unequal to my objects) as insensibly as the morning dew that I should be still postponed or put off with vague promises until perhaps, you & your property may have parted.
There can be no difficulty in settg this, or any other Acct where the debits & credits are regular, & the intentions of the parties are fair; and I am persuaded if you will be at the trouble of riding to this place, a few hours will ascertain the bal. which is due to me—or in case disagreement should arise on any point, it might be so stated as that an impartial Umpire might decide it for us witht trouble or lawsuits besides, I have at this place a number of letters, Papers, and the Mill Books, which might throw light upon things which to you may seem to want explanation, & cannot be had elsewhere—Other matters also might be more clearly explained, & better understd by oral conversation than is practicable by letter. I know of nothing (at present) that will call me from home soon, unless I should go to the New City the first day of next month; of which I gave the Commrs some, but no positive intimation. However, if you are inclined to comply with this request, & will name the precise day you will be here, I will not be from home.
I beg you to be assured, that it will be extremely irksome & painful to me to go into a Court of Justice for the recovery of what is due to me, & for which I have with very great inconvenien[ce] & disadvantage to myself waited so long; but it must be the case unless it can be averted by some measure wch possibly, may be adopted at the meeting wch is now proposed, & which it may be well for you to think on, previous thereto.
I have not yet been called upon legally to answer the complaint of Henshaw; but shall be ready to do it whenever it shall be found necessary or expedient & for that purpose shall keep the Bill, & the answer which you have drawn until I either see you, or hear from you again. The answer as drawn misstated a

fact with respect to the power vested in Mr Lund Washington—The truth of that matter stands thus—The Sale as you have recited, was made in Novr 1774 on 12 months credit. In May following I went to the second Congress as a member thereof witht givg Lund Washn then or at any time thereafter powers fully expecting to return as soon as the business of the Session should close; but, being chosen to commd the Army, I proceeded to Cambridge and from thence—as soon as it became apparent to me that my absence from home was likely to be of much longer continuance than I had calculated upon—I wrote to Colo. Tayloe informing him thereof, & desiring him to take the sole management of the trust which had been commitd to us jointly upon himself, as my situation would no longer permit me to pay any further attention to it—& because I should not consider myself responsible for any transaction subsequent to the Sale. previous to which he had thrown the whole burthen upon me & nothing remained for him to do but to appoint a Collector (if he did not chuse to be at the trouble himself [)], & he submit the money to the decision of the Court agreeably to the decretal Order. What he did—or rather what he neglected to do, would be tedious to relate, & I presume can compose no part of my answer. and with respect to the particular instance of depreciation as stated in the answer, my memory is not furnished with the circumstance at prest. I am—Sir Yr most Obedt Hble Servt

G.W——n


Title: From George Washington to Robert Morris, 23 July 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Morris, Robert

Dear Sir,
Mount Vernon July 23d 1792.

This letter will be presented to you by Mr Jno. Augo. Spotswood, Son of General Spotswood. The enclosure, communicates the ideas of the father, and the wishes of the Son as fully as it is in my power to make them known to you; and when compared with the former letters from Genl Spotswood to me, which you have seen, leaves nothing more for me to add on this subject than to say that your good Offices in behalf of the young Gentleman will oblige the father, the Son & myself.
I have no knowledge of the young man, nor have I the least reason to distrust the character given of him by his father—but it is a fathers account—and you, better than I will know whether any, & what allowances are to be made for it.
Mrs Washington joins with me in a tender of best wishes for Mrs Morris yourself & the rest of the family. With very great esteem & regard I am—Dr Sir—Yr Most Obedt and Affect. Hble Sert

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to Alexander Spotswood, 23 July 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Spotswood, Alexander

[Mount Vernon, 23 July 1792]

Mr Spotswood delivered me your favor of the 10th, on Friday last and I have given him a letter to Mr Morris of Philadelphia,

who, I persuade myself, will render him any service, which it may be in his power to do consistently. At all times, when you can make it convenient, I should be happy to see you at this place; & with my love to Mrs Spotswood, in which Mrs Washington joins me.


Title: To George Washington from Alexander Hamilton, 26 July 1792
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Sir,
Treasury Departmt July 26. 1792.

Samuel Hobart, third Mate of the Cutter on the New Hampshire Station, has tendered his resignation and sent forward his Commission which I retain ’till your return not to encumber you with it at Mount Vernon. This occasions two vacancies, as to that Cutter, of first & third Mate. The Collector of Portsmouth recommends the second Mate, John Adams, for first Mate, and a Benjamin Gunnison, who has been a Master of a Vessel, as second Mate. From a conversation which I had with Mr Langdon, while here I believe the recommendation of the Collector well founded.
The Captain of the Cutter, on the New York Station, informs that Mr Morris the first Mate has accepted an advantageous offer on board of an India-Ship. This leaves the Cutter without any other Officer than the Master, who, and the Collector of New York recommend Capt: Ashur Cook as first Mate, and one John Fenley as second Mate. Captn Dennis also mentions a son of the present Surveyor of New York for third Mate.
The keeping up in the Cutters their due complement of Officers and Men is now become interesting to the public service. As it will not be easy to obtain better lights, I am induced to submit as they stand the recommendations respecting the first and second Mates of each Cutter. As to the third Mate for the New York Cutter some further enquiry is necessary.
Should you approve, and be without blank Commissions, it is

still desireable that I should be able as early as convenient to notify your determination. The persons will enter into service upon that notification and then Commissions can be antedated. With the most perfect respect and truest attachment, I have the honor to be &c.

Alexander Hamilton

P.S. May I be permitted to remind you of the vacancies in the Maryland Cutter, about which you intended to enquire on your way?


Title: To George Washington from Jonathan Trumbull, Jr., 27 July 1792
From: Trumbull, Jonathan Jr.
To: Washington, George

Sir
Lebanon [Conn.] 27th July 1792

I have the honor to inclose, for your information, the Copy of a Letter which I have this day received from Mr Barclay—covering a Petition from the American Prisoners, now in Captivity at Algiers, a Copy of which is also transmitted herewith.
This communication I beg leave to make to you Sir! as the only mean in my power, during the recess of Congress, which can afford me the hope of contributing to the relief of our suffering fellow Citizens, whose unhappy situation is so well pictured in their Petition. With the most perfect Respect & Regard I have the honor to be sir! Your most Obet & most hu. Servt

Jona; Trumbull


Title: To George Washington from Alexander Hamilton, 30 July 1792
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Sir,
Treasury Department July 30. 1792.

I have the honor to transmit herewith sundry papers relative to an arrangement, which has been concerted between the Commissioner

of the Revenue and myself, on the subject of compensation to the Officers of Inspection, in consequence of additional latitude given to The President of the United States by the Act of the last Session entitled, An Act concerning the duties on spirits distilled within the United States. This arrangement, founded on the best lights hitherto in the possession of the Department, is respectfully submitted to your consideration & disposal.
More adequate compensations than those heretofore allowed (and which from necessity were restricted within narrower limits than were originally deemed proper) are essential to the effectual execution of the law. Many Officers wait the issue of a new arrangement to decide their continuance or non-continuance in Office.
The additions now proposed will, it is not doubted, leave the aggregate expence within the limits prescribed by law; the contingent items having been estimated largely for greater caution.
Intimations have been received that the non-execution of the Law in certain scenes begins to produce discontent in neighbouring ones, in which a perfect acquiescence had taken place. This is natural, and implies a danger of a serious nature, if not timely obviated. The inadequateness of compensation, by preventing the acceptance of Offices, where the Law is least popular, is one of the causes of that non-execution. It is interesting that this cause be removed as a preliminary to the vigorous enforcing of the law in the delinquent scenes; which makes it desireable that a more competent arrangement of compensations should be adopted as speedily as shall consist with due consideration and your convenience. With the highest respect and the truest attachment, I have the honor to be &c.

Alexder Hamilton


Title: To George Washington from Alexander Hamilton, 30 July–3 August 1792
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Sir
Philadelphia July 30th [–3 August] 1792

I received the most sincere pleasure at finding in our last conversation, that there was some relaxation in the disposition you had before discovered to decline a reelection. Since your departure, I have lost no opportunity of sounding the opinions of persons, whose opinions were worth knowing, on these two points—1st the effect of your declining upon the public affairs, and upon your own reputation—2dly the effect of your continuing, in reference to the declarations you have made of your disinclination to public life—And I can truly say, that I have not found the least difference of sentiment, on either point. The impression is uniform—that your declining would be to be deplored as the greatest evil, that could befall the country at the present juncture, and as critically hazardous to your own reputation—that your continuance will be justified in the mind of every friend to his country by the evident necessity for it. Tis clear, says every one, with whom I have conversed, that the affairs of the national government are not yet firmly established—that its enemies, generally speaking, are as inveterate as ever—that their enmity has been sharpened by its success and by all the resentments which flow from disappointed predictions and mortified vanity—that a general and strenuous effort is making in every state to place the administration of it in the hands of its enemies, as if they were its safest guardians—that the period of the next house of representatives is likely to prove the crisis of its permanent character—that if you continue in office nothing materially mischievous is to be apprehended—if you quit much is to be dreaded—that the same motives which induced you to accept originally ought to decide you to continue till matters have assumed a more determinate aspect—that indeed it would have been better, as it regards your own character, that you had never consented to come forward, than now to leave the business unfinished and in danger of being undone—that in the event of storms arising there would be an imputation either of want of foresight or want of firmness—and, in fine, that on public and personal accounts, on patriotic and prudential considerations, the clear path to be pursued by you will be again to obey the voice of your country; which it is not doubted will be as earnest and as unanimous as ever.

On this last point, I have some suspicion that it will be insinuated to you, and perhaps (God forgive me, if I judge hardly) with design to place before you a motive for declining—that there is danger of a division among the electors and of less unanimity in their suffrages than heretofore. My view of this matter is as follows:
While your first election was depending I had no doubt, that there would be characters among the electors, who if they durst follow their inclinations, would have voted against you; but that in all probability they would be restrained by an apprehension of public resentment—that nevertheless it was possible a few straggling votes might be found in opposition, from some headstrong and fanatical individuals—that a circumstance of this kind would be in fact, and ought to be estimated by you, as of no importance—since their would be sufficient unanimity to witness the general confidence and attachment towards you.
My view of the future accords exactly with what was my view of the past. I believe the same motives will operate to produce the same result. The dread of public indignation will be likely to restrain the indisposed few. If they can calculate at all, they will naturally reflect that they could not give a severer blow to their cause than by giving a proof of hostility to you. But if a solitary vote or two should appear wanting to perfect unanimity, of what moment can it be? Will not the fewness of the exceptions be a confirmation of the devotion of the community to a character, which has so generally united its suffrages, after an administration of four years at the head of a new government, opposed in its first establishment by a large proportion of its citizens and obliged to run counter to many prejudices in devising the arduous arrangements, requisite to public Credit and public Order? Will not those, who may be the authors of any such exceptions, manifest more their own perverseness and malevolence—than any diminution of the affection and confidence of the Nation? I am persuaded, that both these questions ought to be answered in the affirmative; and that there is nothing to be looked for, on the score of diversity of sentiment which ought to weigh for a moment.
I trust, Sir, and I pray God that you will determine to make a further sacrifice of your tranquillity and happiness to the public good. I trust that it need not continue above a year or two more. And I think that it will be more eligibible to retire from office

before the expiration of the term of an election, than to decline a reelection.
The sentiments I have delivered upon this occasion, I can truly say, proceed exclusively from an anxious concern for the public welfare and an affectionate personal attachment[.] These dispositions must continue to govern in every vicissitude one who has the honor to be very truly and respectfully Sir Your most Obedt & hum. serv.

A. Hamilton

August 3d Since writing the foregoing I am favoured with your interesting letter of the 29th of July. An answer to the points raised is not difficult & shall as soon as possible be forwarded.


Title: From George Washington to Tobias Lear, 30 July 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Lear, Tobias

⟨De⟩ar Sir,
Mount Vernon July 30th 1792.

Your letter from New York came duly to hand, and I was glad to find you had got that far in safety. I wish the remainder of your journey may prove equally pleasant and prosperous. My journey was not of this sort, for after I had parted with the Coach horses I was plagued with those which succeeded them, the following day; and the sick mare, by a dose of Physic which had been administered the night I reached Chester, was so weakened, & failed so much, that she was unable to carry Austin any farther than Susquehanna: from thence she was led to Hartford and left—and two days afterwards gave up the ghost.
I found the face of the Country here, and on the Road this side Baltimore, much, very much indeed, parched by a severe drought; and the Corn in miserable plight; but the day & night we reached home there fell a most delightful & refreshing Rain, and the weather since has been as seasonable as the most sanguine

farmer could wish; & if continued to us may make our Indian Corn crop midling—great it is hardly possible to be—so much was it in arrears when the Rains set in.
Great complaints were heard of the Hessian fly, and of the Rust or Mildew, as I travelled on; and in some places I believe the damage has been great; but I conceive more is said than ought to be, on this subject; and, that the Crop upon the whole will be abundent of Wheat: mine in quantity (and the quality is good) will, I expect, greatly exceed any I have made these several years past.
I found at George town many well conceived, & ingenious plans for the Public buildings in the New City: it was a pleasure indeed, to find—in an infant Country—such a display of Architectural abilities. The Plan of Mr Hoben, who was introduced to me by Doctr Tucker, from Charleston, & who appears to be a very judicious man, was made choice of for the President’s House; and the Commissioners have agreed with him to superintend the building of it—& that of the Capitol also, if they should, hereafter, be disposed to put both under one management. He has been engaged in some of the first buildings in Dublin—appears a master workman—and has a great many hands of his own. He has laid out the foundation which is now digging & will be back in a month to enter heartily upon the work. The Plan for the Capitol was not fixed on when I left George Town—two or three very elegant ones (among a great many others of less merit) had been presented—but the draughtsmen, not being there, a postponement became necessary to receive explanations. The Bridge will be accomplished (it is said) by the time Specified in the Contract; and every thing that could be put in motion before the Plans for the public buildings were fixed on, is in as much forwardness as could be expected—& will now, I have no doubt, advance rapidly.
As you did not mention your having spoke to Mr Morris about the house, I am under some apprehension that you omitted to do it; which will be unlucky. Give me an Acct of what I suggested to you as a matter for indirect enquiry. All here are well, except the Major, whose situation I think is unpromising & precarious—growing worse—they all join me in best wishes for Mrs Lear, yourself & the Child. I am Dr Sir Yr Affecte friend

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to Alexander Hamilton, 1 August 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Sir,
Mount Vernon, August 1st 1792

I learn with pleasure from the War Office, by the Secretary’s last dispatches, that our Northwestern frontier is in a state of tranquility: it may be construed into an indication that some of the messages which have been sent by Government have reached the hostile Tribes, and have occasioned them to deliberate thereon. Devoutly is it to be wished that the result may be favorable, both for themselves and the Ud States.
No expectation of this, however, ought to suspend, or in the smallest degree relax the preparations for War; but as War under any circumstances is expensive, and with such a long & rugged land transportation as the one by which we have to convey the supplies for the Army must, for the quantum of them, be extremely so. It behoves us to be as precise in all our arrangements—as œconomical in our provisions—as strict in our issues, and as correct in accounting for them to the War or Treasury Departments (as the case may happen to be) as possible. That I may know under what regulations these matters are, I have, by this days Post, written to the Secretary of War desiring him to report to me the mode which is pursued by his direction from thence, for providing, transporting, issueing & accounting for them. If the Treasury Department has an agency in any of these matters, I require a similar Report from thence also.
Mr Kean by a Letter which I have received from him, accepts his renewed Commission for settling the Accounts between the United States, & the individual States; which, please to say to him, gives me pleasure—and add, that any efforts he can make to bring this business to a speedy & happy issue, I shall consider as rendering an important service to the Union; because I view

the closing of these Accots speedily as extremely essential to it’s interest & tranquility. Let me know if Mr Langdon (the Commissioner) is returned to his duty? and, in that case, when? I am &c.

G: Washington


Title: From George Washington to Henry Knox, 1 August 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Knox, Henry

Sir,
Mount Vernon Augt 1st 1792.

Your dispatches of the 14th & 21st Ult. came duly to hand, and it is probable the Servt who carries this letter to the Post Office, will bring me a third of this weeks date.
I did not acknowledge the receipt of the first letter at an earlier date, because there was nothing contained in it which required a reply. And I am too little acquainted with the Authority under which Colo. Henry Karr detached Lt Colo. Philips—the cause—or the object of that detachment, to form so good an opinion of the propriety of the measure as it is easy for me to predict the probable consequences of it. I hope Major Gaither has before this, embarked for that quarter, strongly impressed with the views of the general Government, & the disposition of it to preserve peace (if it can be done upon just & honorable ground).
The tranquility, which (by your last accts handed to me) prevails on our No. Western frontiers gives me much satisfaction and affords a pleasing prospect that the exertions of government to bring the hostile Indian tribes into a pacific mood will not have been exercised in vain. This, however, is not to relax any preparation for a contrary event. Proceed as if war was inevitable: but do it, I entreat you, with all the œconomy which can result from system & good regulations. Our finances call for it, & if these did not, our reputation does. The supplies of an Army

through so long, & rugged a land transport[at]ion must, under the best management, be expensive & our attention therefore ought to be proportionate—and that I may form some ideas of the former I desire you would Report to me the Regulations which you have adopted for providing, forwarding, & issuing of them, and the mode of having them accounted for to the depart. of War. I have written to the Secretary of the Treasury for similar information on these points so far as any of them may come within the purview of his department.
Reiterate, in your letters to Genl Wayne, the necessity of employing the prest calm in disciplining, & training the troops under his command for the peculiar service for which they are destined—He is not to be sparing of Powder & lead (in proper & reasonable quantities) to make the Soldiers marksmen.
There is no propriety that I can perceive in giving the Rank of Brigr to Majr Sergant—nor do I conceive that Genl Wilkenson would, or indeed ought, to relinquish his present commd. I have turned this mattr in my thoughts but as yet have not been able to hit upon a character to my mind for the Office of Adjutant General. I will think again, & again on the subject, & will inform you of the result.
So long as the vice of drunkenness exists in the Army so long I hope, Ejections of those Officers who are found guilty of it will continue; for that and gaming will debilitate & render unfit for active Service any Army whatsoever. I am Sir Yr Most Obedt Servt

G.W.

P.S. Would Majr Fish accept the Appointment of Adjutt General with the Rank of Lieutt Colo.? He strikes me as an eligable character. Colo. Posey also (who wants to be employed) might if ready at his pen make a good one, for in other respects (& I do not know that he is deficient in this) he is said to be an excellent Officer.


Title: To George Washington from Alexander Hamilton, 3 August 1792
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Sir,
Treasury Departmt 3d Augt 1792

I have the honor to enclose a letter from the Commissioner of the Revenue of the 25th of July, on the subject of a provisional Contract for the supply of the Lighthouse in New Hampshire; together with the Contract for your consideration & decision. I agree in the opinion expressed by the Commissioner of the Revenue. With the most perfect respect and truest attachment, I have the honor to be &c.

Alexander Hamilton.

P.S. Inclosed you will be pleased to receive the Copy of a letter of 31st May, just received from our Commissioners at Amsterdam. It announces a further Loan of 3,000,000, of florins at 4 ⅌ Cent.


Title: To George Washington from Henry Knox, 4 August 1792
From: Knox, Henry
To: Washington, George

Sir,
War department August 4th 1792

By the letters of the 28th from General Wayne all was quiet on the frontiers.
Captain Hendricks left Buffaloe Creek on the 18th of June and others of the five Nations were to accompany him.
A Mr McConnell a man of Credit has been in this city and left it without my seeing him, he left Fort Washington the first of July, he says the Indian prisoners, who were sent by the way of the Wabash to the hostile Indians had returned, and brought favorable reports of the disposition of the Indians for peace, excepting the Shawanese—and that Genl Wilkinson had written me fully upon the subject, but which I have not received.
The accounts of the Recruits are not materially different from the last Return. I have the honor to be with the highest respect Your most obedt servant

H. Knoxsecy of War


Title: From George Washington to Alexander Hamilton, 5 August 1792
From: Washington, George
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Sir,
Mount Vernon, Augt 5. 1792.

Since the date of my last dispatch to you of the 1st instant, I have received your Letters of the 26. & 30 ulto, and have affixed my signature to the arrangement of Compensations to the Officers of Inspection in consequence of additional latitude given to The President of the United States by the Act of the last Session, intitled “An Act concerning the duties on spirits distilled within the United States.”
I have done this on full conviction that the best information the nature of the case would admit, has been obtained at the Treasury to keep the aggregate within the limitations of the Law, & to proportion the Compensations to the services of the respective Officers; presuming also that it appeared essential (from a full view of circumstances, and the benefits likely to be derived from the measure, to the public) that an increase of the Officers

of Revenue was really necessary; for I should be unwilling to add to the former establishment, unless the propriety of it was apparent. Unless the Attorney General should be of opinion that The President of the United States has power under the Act of March 1791. or the subsequent one of last Session, to appoint (in the recess of the Senate) an Inspector of the Survey newly constituted in Maryland, it must remain, as is proposed, under the immediate direction of the Supervisor.
If, after these regulations are in operation, opposition to the due exercise of the collection is still experienced, & peaceable proceedure is no longer effectual, the public interest & my duty will make it necessary to enforce the Laws respecting this matter; & however disagreeable this would be to me, it must nevertheless take place.
The Collector was not at Baltimore when I passed through that place; but from the Naval Officer I learnt that the service wou’d sustain no loss by the resignation of the Master of the Maryland Revenue Cutter—that the first Mate was a more competent character, and that the general expectation was that he would be appointed to command it. That I might know how far the sentiments of others accorded with those of the Naval Officer, I requested the Supervisor (Mr Gale) to make enquiry & to inform me of the result; but not having heard from him since, the first Mate (his name I do not recollect) may be notified by you, of my intention to commission him Master so soon as I am provided with Commissions for that purpose—at present I have none. The same may be given to John Adams as first, & Benjamin Gunnison as second Mate of the Revenue Cutter in New Hampshire: and to Ashur Cook first and John Fenley second Mate of the New York Cutter. The third Mate for the latter may remain for further enquiry & consideration.
If your information with respect to the proposed characters for the Cutter in New Hampshire is not such as you can entirely rely upon, Mr Lear who is on the spot might afford you some aid in the investigation of them, or others. I am Sir &c.

G: Washington

P.S. As I have neither time nor inclination to copy the enclosed, I would thank you for having a transcript of it made & sent to me.