Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, 23 January 1800
From: Pinckney, Charles Cotesworth
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Cantonment at Harpers Ferry [Virginia]January. 23d. 1800.
Sir,
Your favours of the 7th & 8th instant enclosing me Lieut Gover’s letter, I received by the last post. I have acted in the same manner as you have in refusing to make terms with Deserters previous to their delivering themselves up. There are three skulking on the Alleghaney Mountain who sent in to me three weeks ago, but I refused to make any stipulations with them while they remained out. I shall endeavour to have the Deserter Lee apprehended. I am glad to find by a letter from the Secretary of War of the 9th instant that he has determined that the extra allowance to officers in case of vigorous search & pursuit of Deserters shall not be confined to the regulations of the 19th of December 1798.
The enclosed letters from Major Freeman are on a subject touched on in my last, to wit: double rations. Persons going to Fort Johnson call upon him, not upon Capn. Kalteisen, of course Major Freeman is at the expence of entertaining them. His cl⟨aim⟩ I think is just—otherwise he will only draw four rations while Captn. Kalteisen draws six. I hope some general regulation will be made on the subject.
I remain with great regard & esteem   your most Obedt. servt.

Charles Cotesworth Pinckney
Honable
Major General Hamilton.


Title: Ebenezer Stevens to Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton, 23 January 1800
From: Stevens, Ebenezer
To: Burr, Aaron,Hamilton, Alexander

New York Jany. 23. 1800
Gentlemen
You are senseable there is a balle. of 12, to 15,000 due the several Mechanicks who were employed in making the necessary difence of the City of New York in pursuance of the Resolutions of the Committees appointed for that purpose by the Corporation, the Military &ce. which ballances have been due long time since & the Persons in a distressed Situation for want of the Money, & as the failure of payt. has arisen from some inaccuracy in the passing of the Act of the Legislature on the Subject, in consequence of which the Govr. & Mr. Jones do not feel themselves justified in paying those Accots.
I have taken the Liberty to request your Interference in the Business—you are perfectly acquainted with the Subject & all the facts as they took place, & as you are on the Spot is [it] not adviseable for you to present a Memorial to the Legislature at the opening of the Session praying them to authorize Mr. Jones who is in possesion of the Accots. & direct him to liquidate & to make provision for the payt. of them.
You know my situation, that ’tis not in my power to attend the Legislature at present; it hurts my feelings to have those distressed Men call on me daily for the payt. of their accots. which are justly due, & as I employed them (with your approbation) they all look to me for payt. As their Relief & that of my feelings lay with the Legislature & your Exertions, I have no doubt in Justice to them & to me, you will readily take up the Subject & obtain the necessary objects of the Memorial—in these Sentiments. My Brethren from this City have all united & will cheerfully afford you any assistance the Cause may require & here beg leave to refer you particularly to Mr. Woolsey. Some of these men have suffered very much for want of their dues, some have been burnt out, others driven from Town during the Sickness, & as provision was actually intended to be made by the Legislature for all those Contingencies, Justice as well as Humanity require they should all be relieved without delay. All of which I respectfully submit to your management, & with your attention I have no doubt all the accounts of the military Committee as originally contracted will be justly & speedily liquidated & paid.
Your knowledge of the Importance & nature of the Subject render any further remarks from me unnecessary.
Relying on your dispositions & Exertions to close these accounts to the mutual Satisfaction of all concernd
I remain   with Sentiments of Respt.   Yr. Obt. & humble Servt.

Eben Stevens.
Major Genl. Hamilton   &
Col. Aaron Burr


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from John De Barth Walbach, [23 January 1800]
From: Walbach, John De Barth
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[Shepherdstown, Virginia, January 23, 1800]
General,
Je n’oserai prendre la liberté de vous importuner par la presente, si je ne croyois etre de mon devoir de vous faire part, General, de l’execution de vos ordres, par mon arrivé ici, le septieme jour de mon depart de Philadelphia. J’eus l’honneur le même jour de rendre mes devoirs, au Major General Pinckney, pour lui communiquer mes ordres, et ai eu celui de lui remettre la lettre et livres dont vous m’aviez chargé. J’ai été recu par le General, avec la plus grande bonté, et ne scaurai assez me louer, de celles qu’il veut bien me continuer. comme c’est sans contredit, a vous General, que j’en suis redevable en partie, j’ose vous prier en retour, d’etre persuadé que j’userai de tous les moyens en mon pouvoir, pour me rendre de plus en plus digne de la continuation de vos faveurs, et de celles de mes superieures; et n’attend que l’occasion favorable pour donner des preuves convaincantes de mon sincere attachement, au gouvernement que j’ai l’honneur de servir.
Le General Pinckney n’attendant que vers le 20 du mois prochain, le Genl. Washington et Col. Waats, a jugé a propos (ces Messieurs ne comprenant pas le francois.) de m’employer á la traduction de l’ordonance francoise de 1788 concernant la cavalerie. elle contient de tres bons principes, et est en partie, un extrait des ordonances Prussienes, et Autrichienes, redigée par ordre du Roi, par les Genereaux Guibert, Lambert, D’autichamp, Haymann, &c qui avoient été envoyé a cet effet, dans les armées de ces deux puissances. il est probable qu’elle plaira en differentes parties, aux Généraux qui redigeront l’ordonnance de cavalerie, des Etats Unies, et surtout ce qui concerne les premiers principes du Cavalier Recrue, la plus part des autres ordonnances ne s’etendant pas assez sur cet Article.
M’etant rappellé, General, d’avoir vu dans le tems a New York un sabre a peupres pareil a celui dont j’ai eu l’honneur de vous remettre une description, j’ai écris a mon ami en Camarade Kaumann, de voir s’il pourroit le découvrir et avoir l’honneur de vous le faire voir; j’ose profiter de cette occasion, General, pour recommander ce jeune homme a vos bontes, il est d’un caractere infiniment doux, a été bien élevé, rempli d’honneur et a donné des preuves convaincantes de sa probité dont j’ai été le temoin oculaire, et c’est en conviction de cela que je prend la liberté, general, de m’avancer pour lui, et le rappeler á votre souvenir.
J’ai l’honneur d’etre avec le plus profond respect et la plus haute consideration
General   Votres tres humble et tres obeissant Serviteur

J. WalbachLt. Lgt. Drag.
Shepperstown le 23 Janvier 1800

Major General Hamilton
Inspector Genl.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Louis Le Guen, [25 January 1800]
From: Guen, Louis Le
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[Albany, January 25, 1800]
Cher Général
Je Suis passée deux fois Sans avoir Le Bonheur de vous rencontrer. N’ay pas ettée Plus heureux chés Le Lieutent. Gouverneur d’ou vous ettiée Sortie, Ce qui me decide a vous Laisser Sous Cette Envelope Les 3 Lettres dont jetais porteur. Madame Hamilton ma chargée de vous dire de Sa part mille choses agréables, autant de la part de Madame church, Mlles. Church et Schuyler &c, &c.
Recevés Je Vous prie Le Nouvel assurance de mon respectueux attachement et devouement
cher Gener⟨al⟩   Votre tres Obt. Serviteur

L. Le Guen
Samdey 8 hres. du Soir


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from James McHenry, 25 January 1800
From: McHenry, James
To: Hamilton, Alexander

War Department25th Jany. 1800
Sir
The house of Representatives yesterday passed a bill to suspend enlistments for the six additional companies of cavalry and twelve regiments of Infantry. It is now before the Senate, and may also receive the sanction of that body, altho’ (perhaps) not immediately.
It is therefore thought advisable, that the terms of enlistment be altered and until otherwise directed run, “for and during the existing differences between the United States and the French Republic, or for five years at the option of the government.”
The object of the new terms of enlistment is, to prevent a waste of the public money, in the event of the bill aforesaid passing, by securing the men to fill up the Regiments on the old establishment without additional bounty and cloathing. You will therefore please to put, with as much expedition as possible, orders, to the proper officers, as to leave no question that the men to be enlisted may be transferred from the new into the old Regiments & ⟨fro⟩m one Regiment into another at the pleasure of the Executive.
The only restriction indispensible to be observed is, that no more soldiers be inlisted under the new terms, than will be wanted to fill up to their complement the four Regiments of Infantry, the two Regiments of Artillerists and Engineers and two companies of Cavalry on the old establishment.
To save time, I shall provisionaly instruct Colonels Moore, Hall, Bentley, Parker, Read, J. Smith, Ogden and Wm S. Smith. You will of course occupy yourself in the first instance with orders to the other commandants of Regiments to the Eastward.
With great respect, I have the honour to be, Sir,
Your most ob st

James McHenry
Majr. Gen. Alexr. Hamilton


Title: General Orders, 27 January 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander,North, William
To:

New York, Jan. 27th 1800.
Pursuant to instructions from the Secretary of War, the terms of enlistment of recruits in future raised are to be changed, and instead of being enlisted for any particular corps or regiments, they are to be enlisted for the service at large.
It is directed by the Secretary of War, by instructions dated January 25th 1800, that cadets in the fortifications upon the sea board, and West Point, receive in future the same allowance of fuel per month, as is granted to lieutenants agreeable to regulations established by the War Department.

William North,Adjutant General.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from James McHenry, 27 January 1800
From: McHenry, James
To: Hamilton, Alexander

War Department 27th Jany 1800
Sir,
I now have the Honour to transmit to you a Copy of my circular Letter to Colonels Moore, J. Smith, Read, Bentley, Hall, Parker, Ogden & W S. Smith, in consequence of the Bill which passed the House of Representatives on Friday last, to suspend enlistments for the six additional Companies of Cavalry & the twelve Regiments of Infantry.
You will please to issue such further orders as to you shall appear proper.
I have the Honour to be, Sir, With great Respect,   Your most obed Servant

James McHenry
Major General Hamilton.


Title: Enclosure: War Department Circular to the Commandants of Regiments, 25 January 1800
From: War Department
To: Commandants of Regiments

War Department 25th Jany 1800.
Sir,
The House of Representatives yesterday passed a Bill to suspend Enlistments for the Six additional Companies of Cavalry & the twelve Regiments of Infantry. It is now before the Senate, & may also receive the Sanction of that body. It is therefore thought advisable that the terms of enlistment be altered so as to run “for & during the existing differences between the United States & the French Republic, or for five years at the option of the Government.” You will cause all enlistments under your superintendance to be made accordingly till further orders.
The object of the new terms of Enlistment is to prevent a waste of the public Money in the Event of the Bill aforesaid passing, by securing the men to fill up the Regiments on the old establishment, without additional Bounty & Cloathing.

These instructions are to be observed until you shall receive others or contrary ones from Major General Hamilton.
I have the Honour to be, Sir,   With Respect, Your obed Servt.

James McHenry.


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Elizabeth Hamilton, 30 January [1800]
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Hamilton, Elizabeth

[Albany] Jany 30th [1800]
You will easily imagine, My Dear Eliza, how much I have been relieved by the Post of today. My darling infant is then recovered. Happy news and very contrary to my apprehensions! Let us unite in thanks to that kind being who has thus far protected our little family and ourselves and let us endeavour as far as in us lies to merit a continuance of his favour.
You do not mention the receipt of any letter from me. This is my fourth. One inclosed a letter to your sister. I hope they have all been received. Tuesday next is appointed for bringing on the argument in Le Guen’s cause. The moment it is finished I shall hasten to you.
You have done right as to the House. Leave all to my return. Many kisses for yourself and our Children.
Yr. ever Affectionate

AH

Tell Philip I thank him for his letter & let him have five Dollars.


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Elizabeth Hamilton, 5 February 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Hamilton, Elizabeth

Albany Feby 5. 1800.Tuesday Evening
Tomorrow, My Dear Eliza, your Fathers slay leaves this place for New York. I drop you a line to tell you that I am well and that today the hear⟨ing⟩ of LeGuen’s cause began. I fear prepossessions are strongly against ⟨us⟩. But we must try to overco⟨me⟩ them. At any rate we shall soon get to the end of our journey; and if I should lose my cause I must console myself with finding my friends. With the utmost eagerness will I fly to them.
Don’t be alarmed that Kitty is sent for. Your father is much better and I am persuaded in no manner of danger. But he shews an evident anxiety to have your Sister Kitty with him. She is the pet. And a very pretty pet she is. Adieu My Eliza.

AH


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from John F. Hamtramck, 5 February 1800
From: Hamtramck, John F.
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Pittsburgh February 5th. 1800
Sir
The reason of my troubling you with this Letter, is that I had calculated on receiving Orders from you on some points that were mentioned in some of my Letters to General Wilkinson; this opinion was founded on the difficulty of my hearing from that General occasioned by the very great distance between us. It is also not improbable that some of my Letters may be obscure to you, tho inteligible to him, his knowing well their text; and least it should be the case I will observe that when I wrote him on the organization of the Troops, I alluded to the organization he had ordered of the 1st. 2 and 3d Regiments; some Companies of one were to be transfered to another, as also some Officers—but by a subsequent Order he directed me not to do anything in it till further Orders. The Secretary of War having he said objected to the organization; in this was also comprehended the relief of Detroit next Spring by the 1st Regiment, and a part of that Garrison was directed to be transfered to the first Regiment, which made me say to him in my Letter of the 20th ultimo (a copy of which I have had the honor to send you) that his having directed me to do nothing in the organization till further orders, had also prevented me from doing anything in the movements which were to take place in the Spring, for the latter was so much connected with the organization that it was impossible to execute one without interfering with the other. The General in his arrangements had himself appointed the Pay Master, Qr. Master and Adjutants of the 1st & 2d Regiments, which circumstance made me observe to him in my Letter of the 1st of December, that I believed a Pay Master had been elected in the 2d Regiment, and that one was probably nominated in the 1st—that in either case I wished to know if those he had appointed were to be, or the others. Since which I have received information that one had actually been appointed in the 2d Regiment, the information of which I had the honor of communicating to you some time ago.
I should long ago have had the honor of writing you on the subject, and detailing such inconveniences as appeared to me to Exist at the time I received his orders, and of those measures which appeared to be the best calculated to promote the arrangements he wished for; but as I no more considered myself intitled to your immediate correspondence, and only the organ of General Wilkinson I declined it.
I have the honor to be sir with very great Respect   your most obedient and very humble servant

J. Hamtramck
Major General Hamilton

P.S. Lieut Payton, the Q M of the 1st Regt is now in the States. I want him very much.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Chevalier de Colbert, 6–8 February 1800
From: Colbert, Chevalier de
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Hamburg, February 6–8, 1800. States that it is a sign of progress that France has exchanged five tyrants for one. Discusses strained relations between Russia and Austria and the orders to Suvarov to return to Russia. Reiterates his love for Catherine Church and his regret that she will not be permitted to marry him. Expresses his sorrow over the death of George Washington and his continuing admiration for Hamilton.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from John J. U. Rivardi, 6 February 1800
From: Rivardi, John J. U.
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Niagara [New York] February 6, 1800. Reports that he has “received orders of Colonel Hamtramck To Transmit in future all returns To him as commanding the division To which this Garrison is annexed” and that he “will act accordingly.” Requests that “a gold lancet case or Some other articles” be presented “as a Token of gratitude” to British doctors who “attended our Sick.” States that he “gave effect to the order respecting Soldiers children but felt Severely for one or two Soldiers who have numerous families & who for Several years had been used to consider the allowance of rations To Their Children as invariable.” States: “On the 24th Ulto. we paid our Share of military honors To The memory of the illustrious Washington. I followed as Much as circumstances permitted your orders as published in the papers.” Requests to be relieved and sent to West Point because of his health and his inability to afford the expenses of the command of Fort Niagara. Also requests an advance in pay if he is relieved.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from John Jay, 7 February 1800.
From: Jay, John
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[Albany, February 7, 1800. Letter not found.]


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, 8 February 1800
From: Pinckney, Charles Cotesworth
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Harpers Ferry [Virginia] February 8, 1800. Introduces “Mr. Du Pont de Nemours … a gentleman of considerable talents, extensive knowledge, & unblemished integrity,” whom Pinckney had met in France. States: “He … intends to purchase Land for himself, Family & friends. I am apprehensive of his being taken in by some Land Jobbers, and if in your power, I would be obliged to you to give him advice, if you understand he is about to make an imprudent Contract.”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Elizabeth Hamilton, [10 February 1800]
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Hamilton, Elizabeth

[Albany, February 10, 1800]Monday Morning
The lapse of two days more, my beloved Eliza, has happily diminished the term of my absence from you. It is the most pleasing reflection I can now make. My heart looks forward with delicious anticipation to the period of our reunion.
Capt. Church arrived last night. This gives great pleasure to the ladies who wanted a beau. They persist in saying that they will leave this place with me on Sunday; but I shall not be surprised if this arrival should change their plan. Give Ten Kisses to my sweet little Eliza for me. Accept a thousand sweet embraces for yourself.
Adieu my Angel   Yrs. with unceasing tenderness

AH


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, 10 February 1800
From: Pinckney, Charles Cotesworth
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Head Quarters at Shepherds Town [Virginia]Feby: 10th: 1800
Dear Sir;
I beg leave to enclose you a copy of a letter written to day to the Secretary of War relative to the employment of the Troops at this Cantonment contemplated by him the ensuing Spring & Summer.
Yours truly

Charles Cotesworth Pinckney
Major General Hamilton


Title: Enclosure: Charles Cotesworth Pinckney to James McHenry, 10 February 1800
From:
To:

Head Quarters at Shepherds Town [Virginia]Feby. 10, 1800.
Sir.
Capn: Shepherd of this place, who I understand has the general superintendance of the public works at Harper’s ferry, informs me, that it is contemplated to employ the Soldiers at the Cantonment the ensuing Spring and Summer, in digging a canal. These Soldiers have hitherto been very little trained, having since they have joined their Regiments been almost constantly employed in fatigue work, and tho’ that is now for the most part over, yet I have still very little opportunity to train them, as there has been for this fortnight past above two and three feet of snow on the ground. Every time that the inclemency of the season permitts, both officers and Men are instructed and trained in the rudiments and first principles of military movement. But I cannot expect they will make much progress till they can practise more than they are able to do at present, and I am apprehensive that till the Spring, the weather will be a great hindrance to their improvement. I had conceived that at that period, the training, disciplining, and acquiring military science would have beneficially employed both officers and Soldiers, and that in the course of the Summer they would have made such progress as to have been able to perform the greater and more important maneuvres in such a manner, as to have done credit to the American Soldiery; and that in case of actual service we should meet an experienced foe with disciplined troops, or if at that time our country had no further occasion for us, and we were to be then disbanded, that there would have been so much important military knoledge acquired by a considerable body of our young men, that on any future emergency our country would derive substantial advantages from it. But if the officers and Soldiers instead of learning their duty, are to be taken off to dig canals, I fear that any hopes of their making a considerable progress in the military art, will be delusive. After Men are well trained and disciplined, the Public may derive great advantages from employing their Soldiers in public works; and no person is more sensible than I am of the benefit of keeping troops in some way or other employed. Idleness, which is hurtful to all, is destructive to an army; and the employing disciplined Soldiers in times of peace in useful public works has been frequently practiced. Thus I think Louis the 14th: did when he joined the two seas by the canal of Lanquedoc, and when I was in Scotland in the year 1767, I remember Soldiers were employed in making a military road to the Highlands. But the Soldiers so employed, were old Soldiers, who had been well disciplined, and not raw recruits, who had their profession to learn: And the Soldiers who worked at the roads in Scotland had each of them Sixpence a day, extra; that is double pay, while at this business. The military rule I think being that when soldiers are employed in throwing up temporary works for their own immediate defence, it is counted a part of their duty and they are not paid extraordinarily for it; except by an encrease of liquor; the pick axe and Spade being, as well as the musket, the implement of a Soldier; but when they are employed in permanent works, and in works of public benefit, not for their own immediate defence; as the military road I have abovementioned, they are then allowed an extra pay, tho considerably less than the accustomed price of labour in the country.
I have thus, Sir, freely, tho’ not fully, thrown out my ideas to you, on the first intimation I received, that it was contemplated to employ the Soldiers at this cantonment in canal digging, before they were trained and disciplined. Should you, on considering them, be of different sentiments, your orders when I receive them, will be obeyed.
I have the honor to be, with great respect   your most obedt: humble Servt
Charles Cotesworth Pinckney.
His Excellency
James McHenry Esqr.
Secretary of War.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Uzal Ogden, 12 February 1800
From: Ogden, Uzal
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Newark [New Jersey], Feb. 12, 1800.
Dear Sir;
I send you, ⅌ post, two Discourses, occasioned by the Death of General Washington. As you were much more acquainted with him than my self, I shall be obliged, if you will freely point out the Defects of the Publication, as it may be reprinted. I am, with great Esteem and Regard,
Dear Sir,   Your most obedient humble Servant
Uzal Ogden
Major General Hamilton.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from James Wilkinson, 12 February 1800
From: Wilkinson, James
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Triplicate
New Orleans Feby. 12th 1800
Sir,
After a variety of difficulties and disappointments which will be detailed to you in a moment of more leisure, I arrived in this city yesterday at noon & have been well received, the ordinance Brig is here in safety and will proceed on her voyage up the river for Loftus’ Heights without unnecessary delay, but altho’ the attempt will be made, on a ground of œconomy, to accomplish the deposit of the cannon and public stores, immediately from the transport, yet as the practicability of the measure appears problematical, I shall make provisional arrangements, should the plan be abandoned, for lighters to receive the cargo, and convey it to its destination.
I have no direct information from our posts, but hear of no misfortune except the death of Lieut Lovel, which will delay the payment of the Troops, until the Paymaster may appoint some other officer to this service & send forward bills for the purpose, which should be expedited, as the Troops will soon be more than a year in arrears; and for the office, I will beg leave to name Lieut. William R. Boote, heretofore recommended to you for Paymaster to the 3rd Regiment.
I shall leave this place tomorrow or the next day, and will write you again soon after I reach my Head Quarters, in the mean time it may suffice to say that the Spanish Government instead of offering opposition to our mode of transport, appears disposed to furnish us every necessary aid. I hear generally that our force is concentred at Loftus’ Heights, that the troops have recovered health, and that peace and harmony prevail every where, except in the Quarter of Mr. Bowie’s usurpations, who seems disposed for mischief, and should in my opinion, be driven out of our Territories.
With most perfect consideration and respect, I am Sir,   Your obedient servant

Ja: Wilkinson
Major General
Alexander Hamilton


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from James Wilkinson, 12 February 1800
From: Wilkinson, James
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Duplicate
New Orleans Feby 12th 1800
Sir,
After writing the Minister of War on the 30th ulto. agreably to the enclosed copy & after having received a Pilot on board the Patapsco, we were driven to sea and tossed about by a furious storm, for five days without intermission, nor were all our efforts sufficient to regain our lost ground until the 7th inst when I landed at the Balise, where I found a barge in waiting from the Governor of New Orleans for my accommodation, in which I arrived here yesterday at noon; very fortunately the ordnance Snow had taken a position closer in with the land, where she rode out the storm and is now in front of this city.
The same spirit of amity and conciliation manifest in the time of the late Governor Gayoso, seems to regulate the conduct of his successor the Marquis de Casa Calvo; we experience no exception to the mode we have adopted for supplying our garrisons in this quarter; but on the contrary I think I discover a disposition to aid and cooperate with us in forwarding the views of government.
Various opinions prevail touching the practicability of conveying our cannon &c to Loftus’s Heights in the Snow Actoeon; the experiment will however be made, and in case of failure, lighters will be provided to repair the defect. The clothing &c destined to Fort Stoddert will be landed tomorrow, and will be sent forward to that post under the direction of our Consul Mr. Jones without delay; and as the season is far advanced & the Snow too heavily laden for expedition, I shall employ two lighters to receive part of her cargo, in order to expedite the transport of the articles of immediate necessity to Loftus Heights.
You have under cover an estimate of the expence which will attend the transport of the cargo of the Snow to Loftus’ Heights in river craft, made by our Consul Mr. Evan Jones, but I am persuaded this transport may, by the assistance of the troops, in any alternative, be made for much less: the project being of my own suggesting I cannot be too deeply interested in the event, and I am persuaded a saving of one half in time and expence will eventually be made to the public by the adoption of this route in preference to that by Pittsburgh. With most perfect consideration & respect I am sir
Your Obed servt
Ja Wilkinson
Major General
Alexander Hamilton


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to James McHenry, 17 February 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: McHenry, James

N Y Feby. 17th. 1800
Sir
I have but just returned to this city, having been unavoidably detained at Albany much longer than I had expected.
S of War


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from James McHenry, 18 February 1800
From: McHenry, James
To: Hamilton, Alexander

War Dept. 18 Febry 1800
Dear Hamilton
I have received your letter of yesterday informing me of your return to New York. What I suggested might happen has been realized. The Senate yielded to the supposed momentum of public opinion, or some other agent as powerful, and passed the bill from the House of Representatives to suspend further inlistments for the twelve Regiments & 6 companies of cavalry. A feeble attempt was made in Senate to augment (by an amendment to the bill) the complement of men on the old, to the war, establishment. It failed altho I had been led to believe it would have succeeded.
I inclose my last weak effort for the military academy and the army. I will not be surprized however at the session’s closing without any thing being done. The navy is to ingulph every thing and it is certain should we give to it all our money—it cannot give us in return adequate protection. Both establishments are indispensible, I mean the military and naval. Some however think one of them sufficient, and that to run down the one is to receive funds for the other. You find by my report, that I have pursued a different course, and presumed both necessary.
Adieu. Yours truely & affecy

James McHenry


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Samuel Eddins, 19 February 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Eddins, Samuel

N. York Feby. 19th. 1800
Sir
Serjeant Hunter, the person whom you sent to attend my office as orderly, has this morning left it without permission—leaving a note that he was compelled by indisposition to repair to Fort Jay. This conduct is irregular and deserves reprehension. You will enquire into this affair and communicate to me the State of it.


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to James McHenry, 19 February 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: McHenry, James

New York Feby 19th 1800
Dear Sir
I have read with great pleasure your letter to the Committee of Defence. It presents the subject in a very correct and interesting manner, such as I should expect much good from; if I did not begin to think with Chief Justice Elsworth, that there is in a government like ours a natural antipathy ⟨to⟩ system of every kind.
Yrs. affecly
AH
Js. McHenry Esqr


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to David A. Ogden, 20 February 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Ogden, David A.

N York 20 Feby. 1800
Dr. Sir!
I find that Major Hoops is very disagreeably entangled on the Subject of the boundage to the Sheriff and that without Speedy Succours his delicacy will be not a little exposed.
I am clearly of Opinion that he became by the ultimate Agreement the Agent of all the parties—and that all are in good faith bound to indemnify him on Accounts of Acts relative to the common Interest. What was done was no doubt necessary and proper and Conducive to the Advantage of all the parties. And it Seems to me with a View to future Contingencies, Very important for the Holld Co, by a liberal Conduct towards those who Serve them in any way, to promote a disposition to Serve them and a Confidence in their liberality.
Upon this General reasoning and Considering the Smallness of the sum, I think it will be expedient if you can, to Come to the aid of Major Hoops by an advance of the Money on account of all Concerned. In proportion to Mr Church’s Interest, I undertake that he Will contribute.
With Esteem and regard   Yr Obedt. Sert.
A Hamilton


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to James McHenry, 21 February 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: McHenry, James

New York Feby 21. 1800
Sir
As the season advances fast, when it will be proper to give effect to the new disposition for the Western Army—and as the arrangement of the Officers regimentally is a necessary preliminary to that Operation, I have recurred to your letter of the 15 of November last respecting the arrangement ⟨w⟩hich was submitted to you upon the plan of Brigadier General Wilkinson.
A material object of the arrangment was to prevent as far as practicable the dislocation of Officers from their men, who to avoid very inconvenient and expensive changes of position must be incorporated differently from what they have been. But the effect of that arrangement upon the relative situation of certain Officers appears on examination greater than I apprehended it to be—and it is your decisive opinion that the result would operate injuriously to the service.
In conformity with these considerations I have attempted a new arrangement which is now sent & in which the transpositions are few, and as I understand the matter without prejudice to any. I entreat your speedy consideration of and decision upon it.
In the Regimental staff, some officers are placed differently from the functions they now exercise. But these functions are relative to temporary service & therefore form no objection to a different permanent disposition.
The list which you transmitted me differs from that which was furnished by General Wilkinson—omitting the persons mentioned at foot. I suppose the difference is accounted for by deaths & resignations, which were unknown to the General. If not I must request you to insert them where you think they ought to be. And in every case I request a definitive arrangement.
With great respect & esteem   I have the honor to be Sir   Yr. Obed servt.
Secy. of War

Officers omittedCapt. Jacob Kreemer1 Lt. Wm. Scott
P.S. The following officers have been appointed Inspectors.Major Thomas H. Cushing Division InspectorCapt. Isaac Guion Brigade InspectorCapt. Edwd. D. Turner The same & Lt. Wm. R. Boote has been appointed by General Wilkinson Aid de Camp.
Capt. B. Shaumbergh is recommended as Brigade Quarter Master, and I hope will be confirmed in that capacity.


Title: Enclosure: [List of Military Assignments], [21 February 1800]
From: Brown, Ethan
To:

First Regiment
Infantry
Field

John F Hamtramck

Lieutt: Colonel Commandt:

Thomas Hunt

1st. Major

Thomas H Cushing

2nd. Major D: Inspector

Staff

1st. Lieutt: Robert Semple

Adjutant

1st Lieutt: Yelverton Peyton

Paymaster

2nd Lieutt: Joshua S Rogers

Quarter Master

John Elliot

Surgeon

1st. Surgeon’s Mate

2nd. Surgeons Mate

Company

 1. Thomas Martin
Captain

 2. Thomas Pasteur
ditto

 3. Abner Prior
ditto

 4. Daniel Britt
ditto

 5. Ross Bird
ditto

 6. John Wistler
ditto

 7. Daniel Bissell
ditto

 8. Charles Hyde
ditto

 9. John Michael
ditto

10. Ferdinand L Claibourne
ditto

 1. Elijah Strong
1st. Lieutenants

 2. Nicholas Rosencrantz
ditto

 3. Robert Semple
ditto

 4. Robert Torrans
ditto

 5. Yelverton Peyton
ditto

 6. John W Thompson
ditto

 7. Meriwether Lewis
ditto

 8. John A Davidson
ditto

 9. George Stahl
ditto

10. Charles Smith
ditto

11. Philemon C Blake
ditto

12. Moses Hook
ditto

 1. Joseph H Dwight
2nd Lieutt:

 2. Joshua S Rogers
ditto

 3. Abraham Van Wert
ditto

 4. Peter Robinson
ditto

 5. Elias B Clemson
ditto

 6. Samuel Clinton
ditto

Second Regiment
Infantry
Field

David Strong
Lieutt: Coll: Commandt:

John H Buell
1st. Major

Jacob Kingsbury
2nd. Major

Staff

1st. Lieutt: James Richmond
Adjutant

1st. Lieutt: John Wilson
Paymaster

1st. Lieutt: John Whipple
Quarter Master

William McCrosky
Surgeon

1st. Surgeon’s Mate

2nd. Surgeons Mate

Company

 1. Cornelius Lyman
Captains

 2. Richard H Greaton
ditto

 3. Russell Bissell
ditto

 4. Edward Miller
ditto

 5. Edward D Turner
ditto Be: Inspector

 6. Theordore Sedgwick
ditto

 7. Bartholomew Shaumberg
ditto

 8. Andrew McClary
ditto

 9. Peter Shoemaker
ditto

10. Jesse Lukens
ditto

11. Nanning J Vischer
ditto—Additional

12. Archibald Grey
ditto—Additional

 1. Rezin Webster
1st. Lieutenants

 2. Benjamin Rand
ditto

 3. James Richmond
ditto

 4. John McClary
ditto

 5. Samuel Allison
ditto

 6. George Callender
ditto

 7. John Whipple
ditto

 8. John V Glen
ditto

 9. Zebulon M Pike
ditto

10. Nathan Heald
ditto

11. William Laidlie
ditto

12. John Wilson
ditto

13. James Dill
ditto

 1. Peter Shiras
2nd Lieutenants

 2. Thomas Porter
ditto

 3. Benjamin Bullet
ditto

 4. Seymour Rannix
ditto

Third Regiment
Infantry
Field

Henry Gaithur
Lieutt: Coll: Commandt:

Jonathan Cass
1st. Major

William Kersey
2. Major

Staff

1st Lieutt: William P Smith
Adjutant

Paymaster

1st Lieutt: Peter P Schuyler
Quarter Master

John F Carmichael
Surgeon

John C Wallis
1st Surgeon’s Mate

2nd Surgeon’s Mate

Company

 1. Zebulon Pike
Captains

 2. Isaac Guion
ditto Br: Inspector

 3 John Heth
ditto

 4 Richard Sparks
ditto

 5 William Ricard or Richard
ditto

 6. John Wade
ditto

 7. Samuel C Vance
ditto

 8. John Bowyer
ditto

 9. Aaron Gregg
ditto

10. John Steele
ditto

11. Peter Marks
ditto

 1. Charles Wright
1st. Lieutenants

 2. William P Smith
ditto

 3. Hugh McCall
ditto

 4. George Strother
ditto

 5. William R Boote
ditto

 6. Jacob Wilson
ditto

 7. Peter P Schuyler
ditto

 8. Samuel Lane
ditto

 9. Patrick McCarty
ditto

10. Matthew Arbuckle
ditto

11. John Horton
ditto—Additional

12. John Saxon
ditto—Additional

13. James Ryan
ditto—1st. second Lieutt:

 1. Stephen S Gibbs
2. Lieutenant

Fourth Regiment
Infantry
Field

Thomas Butler
Lieutt: Coll: Commandt:

William Peters
1st. Major

Daniel Bradley
2nd. Major

Staff

1st. Lieutt: George Salmon
Adjutant

1st Lieutt: Richard Chandler
Paymaster

1st Lieutt: Thomas Swaine
Quarter Master

Joseph Philips
Surgeon

David Davis
1st. Surgeon’s Mate

Samuel Davis
2. Surgeon’s Mate

Company

 1. Edward Butler
Captains

 2. Joseph Brock
ditto

 3. Alexander Gibson
ditto

 4. Robert Thompson
ditto

 5. Samuel Tinsley
ditto

 6. Benjamin Lockwood
ditto

 7. William Diven
ditto

 8. Peter Grayson
ditto

 9. Jonathan Taylor
ditto

10. Robert Purdy
ditto

 1. Campbell Smith
1st Lieutenants

 2. Hartman Leithser
ditto

 3. John Wallington
ditto

 4. Francis Johnson
ditto

 5. Thomas Swaine
ditto

 6. Richard Chandler
ditto

 7. George Salmon
ditto

 8. John Campbell
ditto

 9. James Bowman or Bowmar
ditto

10. John Haines
ditto

11. Gabriel Jones
ditto—Additl:

12. Samuel McGuire
ditto—Additl:

13. Thomas Blackburn
ditto—Additl:

 1. Daniel Newman
2nd. Lieutenants

 2. James Love
ditto

 3. Thomas Eastland
ditto

 4. James Desha
ditto

 5. John S Porter
ditto


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to William S. Smith, 21 February 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Smith, William Stephens

[New York, February 21, 1800. On March 5, 1800, Smith wrote to Hamilton: “I have the Honor to acknowledge the receipt of two letters of the 21st.… ulto.” One letter not found.]


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from James McHenry, 24 February 1800
From: McHenry, James
To: Hamilton, Alexander

War Department, February 24, 1800. “… The selection of Col. Ogden for Deputy Quarter Master General is very judicious. He is well qualified in my opinion to discharge the duties, provided he gives himself up entirely to them.… There is a question however which it may not be amiss for you to examine relative to this appointment previous to your making a final communication to Colonel Ogden. A Division Quarter Master may be thought competent under present circumstances, and if it is, the appointment of a Deputy Quarter Master General considered unnecessary.”


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from George Izard, 25 February 1800
From: Izard, George
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Philadelphia. Feby. 25th. 1800.
Dear Sir,
I only received yours enclosing a letter for me this morning. The business which has employed Major Tousard & myself is nearly completed. I have endeavored to be useful to him by planning a method of exercise for Artillery of all descriptions. I shall not enter into details as he has just informed me that he should write to you tomorrow, and give you an account of what has been done.
The letter you were so obliging as to forward to me is from Mr. Wm. Smith at Lisbon, offering me the place of his Secretary; I can make no answer to his proposal before I communicate it to you. Sensible as I am to the honor you have done me by admitting me into your family, I cannot but look forward with apprehension to the moment when you may retire from the Service. If the many Subjects of disgust which offer in the present State of the army should induce you to resign, I shall be loth to return to my former situation—on the other hand if a war takes place, nothing would delight me so much as attending you in the hope of justifying your choice. I am at an age when it becomes necessary to think of assuring myself an independent existence—it is far from certain whether the future I shall possess will place me above mediocrity; in the army I know there is no prospect of pecuniary advantage, and the Road to eminence is long and uncertain. I should with reluctance abandon a profession to which I had dedicated myself from my earliest years—but it would perhaps not be incompatible with the diplomatic walk, and I might hope to obtain my former rank in case this country should at a future period be involved in war. I take the liberty of expressing my Reflections on the Subject with the request that you will direct my conduct, assuring you that I will conform exactly to your advice.
Mr. Smith desires that if I accept his offer I should set out immediately after receiving the Secy of States’ orders.
Believe me, Sir, with the greatest Respect   your most obliged hble Servt.

Geo. Izard.
The Honble Major Genl. Hamilton.


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to William S. Smith, 25 February 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Smith, William Stephens

[New York, February 25, 1800. On March 5, 1800, Smith wrote to Hamilton acknowledging “the receipt of two letters of the … 25th. ulto.” One letter not found.]


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from James Tod, 25 February 1800
From: Tod, James
To: Hamilton, Alexander

New Utrecht [New York] 25 Feb. 1800
Sir
I called at your house on Saturday last to inform you and Mrs Hamilton that both your Sons here are making such progress in their education as gives me real Satisfaction.
I was highly gratified with the two orations delivered in Town on Saturday. That part of Dr. Linn’s where he made your deceased Friend address America when dying was a bold Stroke of oratory. To me the Sentiments contained in it appeared worthy of the great Man. A hint from you before it was delivered would have made him leave out that part where he compared the deceased to Moses, Joshua & David &c.—which to Men of discernment will appear the only exceptionable part of the oration. The Cincinnati (if they have not done it already) ought to request Mr. Mason to publish his oration. There was certainly an originality of thought, an energy of expression, and a genius displayed in the arrangement which as far as I am able to judge is not to be met with in any of the exhibitions yet published on the Same occasion.
For my part I have only one wish more on the Subject which I suppose never will be gratified. That is to See the Character drawn by one who assisted in his Counsels both during the time he was Commander in Chief and President of the United States.
I beg leave to remain with great respect your humble Servant

James Tod


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Lewis Tousard, 25 February 1800
From: Tousard, Lewis
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Philadelphia Feby. 25th 1800
Sir
It was in the Month of October last that I received your first Order to be ready to repair to the Vicinity of your Quarters, to be employed in forming a Code of Regulations, Instruction, &c. for the Artillery of the U. States. From that Moment I prepared Materials for the Purpose, and began in the Beginning of December to execute your Orders. From the enclosed Heads of the Chapters and Sections which are entirely completed, a neat Copy made, and which in a few Days I intend to carry myself to New-York for your Inspection, you may judge of the Progress of the Work. Having, for the rest, all the Materials in Readiness, you will perceive that the Work and your Orders have been carried on and executed with the utmost Diligence; and that more Persons being employed in it would only take the Credit, or at least Part of it, from me without being of much Assistance to me. You have already sent Capt. Izard for that Purpose, to whom I gave the manual Exercise of the Guns to translate.
I would have been extremely flattered with the Cooperation of more Persons in the Beginning of the Work, particularly Major Hoops, but I think that, considering the Advancement of the Work, I may present it to you in the Beginning of April without any further Assistance; and I expected, after two Months of Exertion to have done it by myself, when you ordered Capt. Izard to Philadelphia.
With great Respect   I have the Honor to be,   Sir   Your obliged and very humble Serv.

Lewis Tousard
Major General A. Hamilton.


Title: Enclosure: [Outline of Regulations for the Artillery], [25 February 1800]
From: Tousard, Lewis
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Chapter 1st.
Composition of the Corps, &c.
Sect. 1st.
Of the Composition of the Corps and its Uniform.
Sect. 2nd.
Arms and Accoutrements.
Sect. 3rd.
Infantry Duty, Colours, &c.
Chapter 2nd.
Garrisons.
Sect. 1st.
Of the Duty of Officers commanding in Garrisons. 8 Articles.
Sect. 2nd.
Of the Duty in Garrisons. 26 Articles.
Sect. 3rd.

Repairs and Fortifications. 2 Articles.
Sect. 4th.
Absence of Officers. 5 Articles.
Sect. 5th.
Discipline. 8 Articles.
Sect. 6th.
Quarters. 16 Articles.
Chapter 3rd.
Service in the Field.
Sect. 1st.
Formation of a Train of Artillery. 9 Articles.
Sect. 2nd.
Rank of the Battalions, Companies, and Officers of Artillery in the Field. 5 Articles.
Sect. 3rd.
Of Detachments. 9 Articles.
Chapter 4th.
Of the Train or Convoys of Artillery.
Sect. 1st.
Division of the Convoys. 15 Articles
Sect. 2nd.
Order of March of the Convoys. 10 Articles.
Sect. 3rd.
Convoys in a Country infested with Troops of the Enemy. 4 Articles.
Chapter 5th.
School of Practice in Garrisons, and particularly for the Battalions in the Camp.
Sect. 1st.
Complement of the Battalions destined for the Field, and Nomination of Officers to Attend the Park. 5 Articles.
Sect. 2nd.
Of the practising Ground. 2 Articles.
Sect. 3rd.
Of the several Batteries to be erected on the practising Ground. 12 Articles.
Sect. 4th.
Instruction to be given in the camp Artillery Park. 9 Articles.

Chapter 6th.
Instruction to be given in the Field and on the practising Ground.
Sect. 1st.
Front of a regular Polygon.
Sect. 2nd.
Covered Way.
Sect. 3rd.
Attack and Defence.
Sect. 4th
Saps.
Sect. 5th.
Mines. 7 Articles.
Sect. 6th.
Exercising Days. 12 Articles.
Sect. 7th.
School of Theory.
Chapter 7th.
Of the Park of Artillery.
Sect. 1st.
Position of the Park of Artillery.
Sect. 2nd
Field Ho[r]ses.
Sect. 3rd.
Arrangement of Guns, &c. and Artillery-men of a Train in Divisions and Brigades.
Sect. 4th.
Of the Artillery in a Battle.
Sect. 5th.
Of the Park of Artillery in Case of a Siege.
Chapter 8th.
Flying or horse Artillery.
Sect. 1st.
Invention and Object of the horse Artillery.
Sect. 2nd.
Guns and Howitzers used in the horse Artillery, and the best Manner of employing them.
Sect. 3rd.
Reasons for adopting the 6 instead of the 8 Inch Howitzers.

Sect. 4th.
Of the Carriages employed for the horse Artillery.
Sect. 5th.
Of the travelling Trunnion Plates.
Sect. 6th.
Of manœuvring the horse Artillery à la prolonge.
Sect. 7th
Of the Wursts.
Sect. 8th.
The Adoption of the Wurst would be a saving to the Public.
Sect. 9th.
Advantage of having all the Artillery men mounted on Horses.
Sect. 10th.
Result of the Conference of a Com[m]ittee of French General Officers, relative to the Advantages of the horse Artillery, in 1792.
Sect. 11th
Twelve Prs may also be employed in the horse Artillery.
Sect. 12th
Diminution or even Suppression of the battalion Pieces to encrease the horse Artillery.
Sect. 13th.
Return of Guns, Carriages, &c. to form a Division of one Company of horse Artillery all mounted on Horses.
Sect. 14th.
Alteration in the above Return in Case Wursts should be used.
Sect. 15th.
Alterations in the Artillery of the U. States which the Adoption of the horse Artillery will render indispensible.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Rufus King, [26 February 1800]
From: King, Rufus
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[London, February 26, 1800. Letter not found.]


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to James McHenry, 26 February 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: McHenry, James

New york Febr 26 1800
Sir
I have received your letter of the twenty fourth instant.
I have reflected on the question proposed for my consideration, but am of opinion that the course heretofore recommended to be persued is the most proper.
Should circumstances hereafter render it expedient to unite the two brigades the Division quarter Master would have a local situation, whereas the Deputy Quarter Master General whose duties are coextensive with the district can be ordinarily stationed at Head Quarters where he will be useful to superintend the intire branch of the service. Besides it is doubtful with me whether Col. Ogden would accept the post of Division Quarter Master, whilst I have reason to believe he will accept that of Deputy Quarter Master General. I have therefore announced him as provisionally appointed to the latter office.
Sy of War


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to George Izard, 27 February 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Izard, George

New York Feby. 27th. 1800
Sir
Your letter of the 25th. instant was received yesterday. I should certainly regret any occurrence which might deprive me of your Services unless being one which was likely to redound to your own honor and advantage.
It is very certain that the military Career in this country offers too few inducements; and it is equally certain that my present Station in the Army cannot very long continue under the plan which seems to govern. With these impressions it would consist with a candid and friendly part towards you to discourage your acceptance of the invitation you mention. You are doubtless aware of the uncertainties which rest on the diplomatic State also; and after balancing well you will make your election; pe⟨rfectly⟩ assured of my cordial acquiescence in ⟨either⟩ event, and of my constant wishes for ⟨your⟩ Success.
Major Toussard has infor⟨med⟩ me of his progress in preparing the ⟨Regulations⟩. The necessity of your further attention [to] this object has ceased. I remain with ⟨great⟩ esteem & regard yr friend &c.
Capt. G. Izzard


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from John Brown, 28 February 1800
From: Brown, John
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Philadelphia, February 28, 1800. “I have this Day Recd. a Letter from Mr. Bogert, Adviseing me that his Ill helth was Such that he Could Not go to Albaney and that he therefore committed the Buissiness of my Petition to Genl. Hamilton which would have beene perfectly Agreeable to me if you Could have Attended to the Same. He Informs me of your Return, and does not Advise weither you have Imployd Other Council to Attend in my behalf or Not, but that Colel Burr who he Sas has Some clame Against Angersteen is Useing every Effort to Defeat my Title, and that you think I had better Set of for Albaney Immediately. My Dr. Sr. what can I do I am No Law Year and have Confided in Mr. Bogert with Such Aid or Council as he Chose to Get, he and you know Ten times better than I Can how to Conduct the Buissiness, I theirfore Begg Your Attention to the Same.…”


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Thomas Freeman, 28 February 1800
From: Freeman, Thomas
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[Philadelphia] February 28, 1800. “I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 11th Ult. in answer to mine respecting the Public works at Loftus’s Heights on the river Mississippi.… You requested me to give you an account of the plan and state in which the work was at the time of my departure from thence. Conceiving that I could not better convey to you an idea of the plan, and state in which I left the work, than by furnishing you with a sketch of the plan itself, I take the liberty herewith to transmit a rought draught thereof, which you will please to observe, has been drawn wholly from memory.… Agreeably to your Directions I yesterday waited on the Secretary of War, to know what arrangements could be made for my return to the above work. He observed that he had nothing to do with that business—That General Wilkinson had the whole direction and management thereof, and that he could not with propriety even advise me to go there or stay. He further said, that he expected General Wilkinson here in April next. Deeming it absolutely necessary that I should have an interview with General Wilkinson previous to my resuming my charge of the Work, and it being very doubtful whether I could reach that country before the general leaves it, It appears advisable to await his arrival here.”


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from James McHenry, 28 February 1800
From: McHenry, James
To: Hamilton, Alexander

War Department February 28, 1800
Sir,
Enclosed is the list of the Officers of the four regiments of Infantry which was omitted to be sent in my letter of Yesterday.
I am Sir   with great respect   Your obed Servant.

James McHenry
Major General Hamilton
New York


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to James McHenry, 28 February 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: McHenry, James

New York Feby 28. 1800
Sir
I send you the inclosed papers as they came to me from the Pay Master General. It appears that the account of Capt Ellery, after having travelled backward and forward between the offices of the Pay Master and Accountant, has found no person who could adjust it. I cannot presume, that it has been finally rejected, because there is no evidence of a definitive application to you.
If there are any cases in which a Commanding General may by his orders authorise the incurring of incidental and casual expences for the good of the service, the present is such. It was impossible for Capt Ellery with less assistance than he had to get through the business of this office, especially in the first stages of its operations. A competent number of officers to assist could not at the time be had without injuring other parts of the service. Nor would this expedient have much diminished the expence. I am clearly of opinion that an officer cannot with propriety be permanently detached from the peculiar duties of his station to be employed in services of a Clerical nature without an extra compensation proportioned to the extra labour. And that as often as the measure is necessary, such a compensation ought to be made. And I believe that ours is the only service in which there is not a military chest with a contingent fund applicable to such cases, or some officer of the Staff competent to the defraying of similar expences as they occur.
In the return of these papers to me I discern a fresh instance of the want of some interior regulation of your Department, by which cases out of the general rules may be decided with due dispatch. Every day shews me more and more the embarassments which from the same cause perplex and distress every military agent who has any thing to do with directing or making expenditures. A remedy is indispensable to the credit & success of the service.
As to the matter immediately in question, it is my opinion (as it seems to have been that of the Pay Master General and Accountant) that your special sanction is necessary. It will give me pleasure to learn that you have thought it right to afford that sanction.
With great respect & esteem   I have the honor &c
The Secy at War


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from James McHenry, [1 March 1800]
From: McHenry, James
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[Philadelphia March 1, 1800]
Dear Sir
Will you give a few hours to the formation of a bill, or bills, providing. 1. For the modifications of the two Regiments of Artillerists agreeably to the principles laid down in my report. 2. For establishing the Fundamental School and School of Artillerists & Engineers. 3 For such other points mentioned in my report as requiring legislative provisions. 4 An explanatory clause in the latter bill defining the officers intitled to double rations. The two first bills, or bills for the two first named objects, I request you to send me as soon as possible. Such is the pressure of business upon me, that it is out of my power to do justice to these subjects.
Yours sincerely & Affly

J. McH
1 March 1800
Major Gen. Alexr. Hamilton


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, [1–25 March 1800]
From: Pinckney, Charles Cotesworth
To: Hamilton, Alexander

[Shepherdstown, Virginia, March 1–25, 1800]
(Confidential)
Dear Sr:
Be so good as to inform me if your general orders relative to rank of the 9th: of last September are means to operate within a Regiment, or whether they are only intended to decide the rank when officers of different Regiments meet together. Till I hear your determination, I shall confine them to the latter construction, because I remember we took a great deal of pains to arrange the internal Rank within the Regiments. The particular reason for my begging the favour of you to explain this matter is because Major Beal a most excellent officer of the 9th Regiment, and who, I well recollect we intended should have been Colonel of the Regiment, if Coll: Hall’s Friends had not said he would serve, (& who was appointed because he had been a good Colonel the last War), is likely I hear to lose that place, and that Major Hopkins under the construction made at the War office of your order, is to take it. Major Beal expressly stands as first Major in the copy of the nomination delivered me by Coll. Lear, & his name precedes Major Hopkin’s in the list sent me to the Southward from the War office. I do not know a better Major in the service than Major Beal; he has great military talents and is a very superior officer. I have had no opportunity yet of knowing the merit of Major Hopkins, as he has but lately arrived here; but his reputation for military Talents does not stand in comparison with Major Beals. He was a Captain in Baylor’s Regiment last War, & Brigr: Genl: Washington informs me, he considered him as one of the most indifferent officers in it. Coll. Watts who is also here coincides in opinion with him. With respects to Mrs. Hamilton I remain
Yrs truly

Charles Cotesworth Pinckney
Majr: Genl: Hamilton


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Benjamin Wells, 1 March 1800
From: Wells, Benjamin
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Philadelphia
March the 1th 1800
Sir
Inclosed you have a Copy of the report of the Committee of Claims on my petition for Compensation for losses Sustained by the insurgants and as I have recieved no answer from my letter to you I would thank you to let me no if you expect to be at this place Shortly or if I Should Come to new york—when I may se you their. I have had some Conversation with Mr. Gallentine respecting my Claim against the United States he is of Opinion that the Government ought to indemnify all thos who Suffered for Suporting the law that the money which has been received by the Sufferers was a mear loan that they are liable to be Called on at the pleasure of Congress that a finall Settlement aught to take place which is my wish and the reason I am Come to this place. I have had a thought of petitioning Congress for a grant for a small quantaty of land in the non western terytory as a Compensation for my losses of Time and personal abuses of my Selfe and famaly in exertions to bring into operation the law of the united states. Should this meet your approbation you will be so kind as to in close me a petition with directions how to proceed and believe me to be with respect your most
Obedient Serveant

Benj Wells

N B you will direct your letter to the Cear of John McCauley North 4th Street.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from George Izard, 2 March 1800
From: Izard, George
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Philadelphia. March 2d 1800
Dear Sir,
If any thing could add to the respectful sense I entertain of your favors to me, it would be the obliging manner in which you received my Request of directing my choice. I have determined to accept of Mr. Smith’s Invitation, and have been principally influenced by curiosity in the step I have taken. The hope of seeing countries so little known to us as the Turkish Dominions is a powerful attraction to this new Career.
On informing Mr. McHenry of my intention I asked him if it would be impossible to allow me to retain my Rank in the Army, and obtain leave of absence during a twelvemonth—there are several Instances of such favors having been granted to Officers, and there is even now an example of it. He referred me to you on the subject—if there is no impropriety in my request I should hope that you would not refuse me an opportunity of offering my services to you on a future occasion.

If I can settle some business for Mr. Smith by the middle of the week I shall set out for New York at that time, and endeavor to pass in the packet to Falmouth which sails in a few days. In taking leave of you I hope to see you persuaded of the Sincerity with which I am, Dear Sir,
Your grateful humble servant:

Geo. Izard.
Genl. Hamilton.


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to James McHenry, 2 March 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: McHenry, James

New York March 2. 1800
Sir
I some time since sent you an estimate of the Cloathing requested for the Troops under my immediate Command for the ensuing year, proposing at the same time the materials should be forwarded so that the cloaths might be made up or altered during the Winter. I regret much that your arrangements could not answer my wishes, as the winter is far advanced, the time is approaching when some of the Soldiers will require Cloathing, and punctuality at present particularly desireable on account of the Soldiers being new recruits, and of course very deficient in the requisite care for the preservation of the Cloaths, so much so, that most of them will be soon in a very distressed situation.
with great respect
Secretary of War


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to James McHenry, 3 March 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: McHenry, James

Private
New York March 3. 1800
Dr Sir
I am told, though I really have not seen the law, that one has passed suspending the Recruiting Service for the Twelve Additional Regiments. You are aware that an instruction from your Department ought to precede my agency upon that law.
Yrs. truly

A Hamilton
The Secy of War


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Benjamin Wells, 3 March 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Wells, Benjamin

New York March 3rd 1800
Sir
I have received your letter of the first instant, as well as previous letters on the same subject; and altho’ I have returned no answer, yet, I have not failed to express an opinion in favour of your claim to the Secretary of the Treasury. It appears to me that officers of the United States who sustain injury, in consequence of their exertions to carry the laws into effect, ought to be indemnified by the public. Policy requires it, as nothing can have a greater tendency to make them zealous in the discharge of their duty. Justice equally requires it, as the injuries, in these cases, are generally committed by persons in disguise, and it is, of course, impossible to obtain redress by civil prosecution. The committee of Claims, however, appear to have viewed the subject in a different light. I am sorry for it, but it does not belong to me to rejudge their decision.
Mr. Wells


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to John Jay, 4 March 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Jay, John

[New York] March 4. 1800
Dr. Sir
We are all here very anxious for the success of Mr Coleman. We know his abilities and we believe in his integrity. Your good disposition towards him is well understood—Yet it is feared that his pecuniary situation may prove an obstacle. It is undoubtedly a good rule to avoid embarrassed men in appointments—yet this like every other general rule may admit of exceptions in special cases. If I understand the duties of the Office in question it is peculiarly one in which there could be no danger of Evil from the cause alluded to. There is scarcely an Opportunity for infidelity if there was a disposition. I really think the objection may without impropriety be waved & if you on reflection should think the same it will be very pleasing to us.
Very respectfully & affetly   Dr Sir   Yr Obed Serv

A Hamilton


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Nathan Rice, 4 March 1800
From: Rice, Nathan
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Oxford [Massachusetts] March 4th 1800
Sir
I enclose you the Commission of Martial Spring a second Lieutenant in my regiment with his request to have permission to resign the same. He has not expressd the reasons which induce him thereto. I suppose however among others, the uncertainty of the establishment has influenced him—many of the officers have it in contemplation, thinking it more eligible now to leave the service, than to remain a short time longer therein, & then be obligd. to.
I wrote some time since, & transmitted recommendations of Doctor Barron, for an appointment as a Surgeon’s Mate: from a hope and expectation of its taking place soon, he came to this post in Decr. At the time there was neither a Surgeon or Mate in the Ground but Doctor Blake of my Regiment. He remained with us, and at the request of Major Lynde, & his officers he attended the sick of the 16th. Regiment—and hath continued so to do ever since, with great assiduity, & hath received their & my full approbation—and obtained their recommendation of him for their Surgeon. I wish he might have an appointment in one or the other capacity and that it might have retrospect to the time he joined us as his services have been very beneficial.
Will you give me leave Sir to ask your opinion whether the vacancies which happen by resignation or otherwise will be filled or not, if so, whether by new appointments or succession.
I should also, if proper, be happy in your ideas in the present establishment, as to its permanency, and destination the ensuing Summer, at least that part of it now at Oxford.
The measures I took have restored order and subordination amongst our Soldiers.
With the utmost respect I am Sir   your most ob. Servt.

N: Rice L Colo Command


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Caleb Swan, 4 March 1800
From: Swan, Caleb
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Philadelphia, March 4, 1800. “… My letter to you and your answer thereto on the subject of double rations, were laid before the secretary of war, and by him referred to the Comptroller, who declined giving an opinion, but referred the subject to the entire decision of the secretary of war, whose opinion is in future, to be regarded as definitive at the treasury in all doubtful cases. The secretary of war from a pressure of other business, has not yet acted on the question.”


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to John F. Hamtramck, 5 March 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Hamtramck, John F.

New York March 5th. 1800
Sir
Enclosed is a letter of this date to Genl. Wilkinson, which being open for your perusal will also serve as a guide in the execution of the orders you have heretofore received from that General, and will furnish you with the information you desire on several points. You will particularly observe that there are some alterations in the arrangement of the Regimental Staff.
As to the concluding paragraph of your letter to me of the fifth of february, I remark that if you make in your letters to General Wilkinson the representations and observations which the good of the Service may appear to you to require, these will be seen by me in the Copies of those letters and they will give me an opportunity to convey my sense in the manner I have done in the letter now transmitted.
Lt. Peyton is at present engaged in the recruiting Service. It will not be long before he will be ordered to join his Regiment.
With &c
Colo. Hamtramck


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Henry Lee, 5 March 1800
From: Lee, Henry
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Philada. March 5th. 1800
My dear sir.
Yr. very friendly letter I duely recd, & altho I was persuaded you could not listen a moment to the base insinuations to which I referred, yet I felt not inconsiderable satisfaction in the explicit contempt which yr. answer manifests. This game yet continues, in a late aurora an absolute falshood is issued to the world in which I am at large named & my friend Ludwell Lee by initials. The letters he alludes to, I never heard of before, & I well know that Mr. Lee is like myself equally ignorant of them. I beleive no letters of the sort were ever published in Virga—at least I never heard of such, nor saw such. On what ground the assertion has been risked I am at a loss to conjecture. I had at first determined publicly to contradict the falshood with my name, but in this have been stopped by the disapprobation of gentlemen in whom I place confidence.
It gives me pain to find you so despondent. Certainly you cannot regard the calumnys of yr. enemys. This to them would be high gratification. Nor ought you to despond of yr. country: we have heretofore prospered, when surrounded by infinitely greater difficultys, in contributing to which prosperity, no man alive has done more than yr. self.

Be then more like yr self & resist to victory all yr. foes.
It would give me great pleasure to see you here, & I had expected that official duty would have brought you among us a second time during the winter. We are now engaged in the little pitiful business of the irish murderer Nash & I fear much of our time will be spent in this dirty affair.
Yrs. affty.

H. Lee


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to James McHenry, 5 March 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: McHenry, James

N Y. March 5th 1800
Sir
I have received your letters of the twenty seventh of February, and of the third of March.
You mention that it will, probably, be thought expedient to suspend the filling of vacancies which may have been occasioned by staff appointments, or other causes. If, indeed, the disbandment of the additional regiments be an event which is expected very shortly to take place, the thing will be perfectly proper; but, unless this is the case, I could wish the vacancies supplied without delay since nothing tends so directly to create inconvenience as the omission of measures which are requisite to the complete organization of the several corps.
The necessary communication shall be made to the Quarter Master General respecting Captain Shaumberg. Should this Gentleman be appointed as Brigade Quarter Master he will be stationed where he can render most service to the brigade to which he may be attached.
If the additional regiments are disbanded it will, doubtless, be proper to appoint such officers of merit, as may feel disposed for it, to the vacant second Lieutenancies in the old establishment. I should not recommend the going further, as it would break in upon the established rules of military promotion, and would involve injustice to the officers of the old regiments especially as they did not profit in the way of promotion from the augmentation of the army.
S of War


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to James McHenry, 5 March 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: McHenry, James

N York March 5th 1800
Sir
Captain Izzard has determined to accept the appointment of Secretary to Mr. Smith our minister Plenipotentiary at the court of Lisbon, but, is desirous of retaining the commission which he holds in the army of the United States.
I would submit to you the propriety of gratifying his wishes in this particular. When an officer is absent on public service, and the situation of affairs at home is not such as to render his presence important, it appears to me that no injury can result from permitting him to retain his commission. If you should concur in this idea, a furlough can be granted to Captain Izzard for a twelve month, to be renewed, or not, at the expiration of that period, as circumstances may dictate.
S of War


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, 5 March 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Pinckney, Charles Cotesworth

New York, March 5, 1800. States that Thomas Parker has recommended the Reverend William Hill for chaplain. Quotes from James McHenry’s letter of March 3, 1800.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from William S. Smith, 5 March 1800
From: Smith, William Stephens
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Union Brigade [Scotch Plains, New Jersey] March 5th. 1800
Major General Hamilton
Sir.
I have the Honor to acknowledge the receipt of two letters of the 21st. and two of the 25th. ulto. I have taken measures to obtain correct information, of the disturbances which took place at Elizabeth Town, between Capt. Courtlandt & Lt. Livingston, with some people at a public House. The account in the news paper is grossly exagerated as appears to me, from the statements I have already obtained. I shall be able however in a few Days to present you with a candid statement of the whole transaction.
In ansr. to The one letter of the 25th. on the subject of Hospitals I find no House, can be procured here, for a Hospital and whether the Brigade remains here or not, a building of the kind will be necessary, upon the supposition, that some Troops will or ought to be constantly kept, here when we do move, we shall be forced to leave, many Sick & Convalessents behind, under the Command of a Capt. or Major. The plan I had contemplated, was a house of 90 feet by 20. with posts of 12 feet so as to give the Ground floor rooms of 7 feet & the upper rooms about 4 feet 6, allowing 6 inches for the beams and upper floor. this house will admit of three divissions giving rooms of 30 by 20, above and below—2 for each Regt.—which with small kitchens will not exceed £300.
I have done myself the honor of making communications to you on the subject of Capt Kirklands affair, and am surprised the letter has not reached you.— It is about an equal chance or other against him, what with his personal indisposition and mental perplexities, that his debts will be paid, with a muffled drum & Rosline Castle in a few months, it would be humane to let him die as easy as possible—he may however get over it—but I must confess I have some doubts. I am content that the morris-Town, question should rest. I have been totally silent upon it—and shall remain so—but you may be assured a considerable proportion of the people, have “hay on their horns”—and that I think it extreamly imprudent that we should be permitted to remain longer without Cartridge—there is a revolution taking place here in the religious societies. A minister by the name of Austin who you doubtless have heared of, is blowing the trumpet in Sion—calls it his Jubelle Trump and proposes, as he says to establish, the new Jerusalem, he is a man of talents, and address, & mixes a degree of Enthusiasm in his Sermons & conversation, well calculated ad captendum Vulgus. His influence is very extensive, and encreasing daily. I have on political principles, been very civil and attentive to him, I have in conversation with him mixed a little of my civil and military enthusiasm, with his religious, and think I can command him. I believe it would be of great service to embrace him, by inviting him to perform divine service for our troops, either temporary or permanent as a Chaplain. I can make him preach fœdral Sermons and sing hymns of Union, and use him effectually to quiet a spirit of insurrection, which is groaning in morris—and only waits opportunity or some ostensible cause, to break forth—but of this from the light you have, you are better competent to judge of than myself. Your other Letter of the 25th on wood and its consumption—my calculation when I consented that Mr. Dayton should make a Contract for 300 cord to be extended optional to 600—was—that the public allowance exclusive of contingencies, from the 10th. of July, to the first of April would demand an issue or 422 Cords & 66 feet, agreable to War-office allowance, there would then be in reserve 177 Cord & 62 feet, for summer purposes, should the contract be fulfilled to its extent—& I do not now believe it will ever be got for less, than 26/.—the store keepers have been in the habit of giving 24/—& still do, and it is really worth it to bring it past the stores to Camp. You may rest assured the regulations of the war-office, shall in no manner be deviated from, unless at moments of the most pressing necessity they have not yet occured & I hope they will not. I have been obliged to indulge the Guards in storms and very cold weather but the troops have been kept to the regular issue.
I have the Honor to be with the greatest respect
Sir,  Your most Obedt.   Humble Servt.

W. S. Smith  Lt. Colo. of ye 12


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to James Wilkinson, 5 March 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Wilkinson, James

New York March 5. 1800
Sir
Col Hamtramck has transmitted me copies of letters from him to you of the 24 & 26th of November 1, 20 and 25 of December.
A definitive organization of the four Regiments of the old establishment has been made by the Department of War of which the inclosed is a copy & must govern. This exhibits the state in which the Officers of those Regiments stand in the records of that Department.
Few transpositions have been made. These few may give some though not much facility to the execution of the general plan. The staff are established as nearly in conformity with your views as the circumstances would permit. You will however understand that the appointment of Capt Shaumberg as B. Q M cannot be absolute till it shall have received the sanction of Mr. Wilkins Qr. M General.
It is expected that the incorporation of the men of the several regiments in the manner heretofore communicated by you to Col Hamtramck will be carried into execution. It will be easier for the officers to change their places than for the men to be transported great distances. The former must of course be directed, so that Officers and men may be together. Our general plan (except as to the alteration in the distribution of the Officers) is to stand.
You will observe the remark respecting transfers in the letter of the 20th. of December. Your prohibition was doubtless proper, the transfers of men from one Regiment to another being always the exercise of a very delicate authority & one peculiarly proper to be reserved to the Chief Officer of a Military District or command (being in the case of the Western army yourself)—Yet the transfer of supernumeraries is proper and it is well that it should be carried into effect in all existing cases. It is expected that Col Hamtramck (to whom this letter will go open) will take the requisite previous measures for the incorporation of the troops in the plan prescribed and that he will unite with the transfer of supernumeraries.
The paragraph respecting the Indians in the letter of the 26 of November was immediately communicated to the Secy of War, who I presume, has given direction concerning the subject of it. While the system of separating the management of Indian affairs from the Military and confining it to the Superintendants and their Agents continues, it is for us to conform to it with every good disposition. If there are intrinsic objections they will manifest themselves in the practice. If there are not the public service will be promoted and the Military disburthened of cares which will always subject them to suspicion and criticism.
A Division or brigade Inspector is to furnish his own horses and he must be allowed to draw forage for such as he may have not exceeding two. The equivalent in money for want of a specific provision cannot at present be allowed.
The Detachments in a course of recruiting under Majors Bradley Buel & Cass will as soon as the roads permit be marched to Fort Fayette there to receive their final destination.
With great consideration esteem & regard I am Sir   Yr Obed Ser
B General Wilkinson


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from Marquis de Lafayette, 7 March 1800
From: Lafayette, Marie-Joseph-Paul-Yves-Roch-Gilbert du Motier, marquis de
To: Hamilton, Alexander

La Grange departement de Seine et Marne March 7th 1800
My dear Hamilton
Mde de fleury widow to our Gallant friend Having Imparted to me Her Intention to Adress the Governement of the United States, is pleased to think that Letters from me, and one particularly to you, Might Serve Her purpose. I am Sure the American Citizens, and Above all our Brother Soldiers, Need Not Being Reminded of the Brilliant and Useful Service Which the Late General fleury Had the Happiness to Render. Unfortunate it is for Mde de fleury that Her Application Can No More be patronized by Him whose Lamentable Loss to Mankind is to You, to all His personal friends, to Me His Adoptive and Loving Son So desolately deplorable! The Great and deserved share You Had in His Confidence, the obligations which Col fleury Has often Been Under to Your Esteem and friendship Entitle You to Receive and promote Any proper demand that His Worthy Widow finds Herself By Her Situation and the Merits of Her Husband Warranted to Procure. I am Most Affectionately, dear Hamilton
Yours

Lafayette.


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to Henry Lee, 7 March 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Lee, Henry

N. Y. March 7th. 1800
My dear Sr.
The letters to which you allude in yours of the 5th. instant have never been seen by me. The truth is that I pay very little attention to such Newspaper ebulitions, unless some friend points out a particular case which may demand attention.
But be assured once for all, that it is not easy for these miscreants to impair the confidence in and friendship for you which are long habits of my mind. So that you may join me in looking with indifference upon their malicious efforts.
You have mistaken a little an observation in my last. Believe me that I feel no despondency of any sort. As to the Country it is too young and vigorous to be quacked out of its political health—and as to myself I feel that I stand on ground which, sooner or later, will ensure me a triump over all my enemies.
But, in the mean time, I am not wholly insensible of the Injustice which I from time to time experience; and of which, in my opinion, I am at this moment the victim. Perhaps my sensibility is the effect of an exaggerated Estimate of my services to the U. States—but on such a subject every man will judge for himself. And if he is misled by his vanity he must be content with the mortifications to which it exposes him. In no event however will any displeasure I may feel be at war with the public Interest. This in my eyes is sacred.
Adieu
Genl. Lee


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from James McHenry, 7 March 1800
From: McHenry, James
To: Hamilton, Alexander

War Department 7 ~ March 1800
Sir
I have received your two letters dated the 2d. & 3d. instant.
I enclose copy of “An act to suspend in part an act, intitled an act to augment the army of the United States, and for other purposes” passed the 20~ ultimo—providing that all further enlistments under the 2d. Section of the original act, shall be suspended until the further order of Congress, unless in the recess of Congress, and during the continuance of the existing differences between the United States, and the French Republic, war shall break out between the United States, and the French Republic, or imminent danger of invasion of their territory, by the said Republic, shall in the opinion of the President of the United States, be discovered to exist.
You will be pleased to issue your orders, to carry into effect the intentions of the act, and stop recruiting for that part of the army contemplated.
My letter to you, of the 25th. January last was written in expectation of the passing of the enclosed act and designed to effect the same purpose, as a direct countermand of recruiting for the 12 Regiments. The proposed change of the terms of enlistment, so as to embrace the alternative “for and during the existing differences, between the United States, and the French republic, or for five years, at the option of the Government”—it was expected would prevent a waste of public money, by securing the men that might be enlisted under such terms in all events to fill up the regiments on the old establishment, without additional bounty and cloathing.
This operation however required attention to be paid, to prevent the number enlisted, exceeding what is requisite to fill up the deficient ranks on the old establishment, which I pray you sedulously to give. As recruiting rendezvous were already established, it was believed proper to make them for a time, most useful by a change, which in one event would give the men enlisted to the new regiments, and in another secured them to the old, without fresh expences.
With respect to cloathing for the ensuing year, for the army under your command you will perceive that embarrassments perhaps blame would attach, if under present circumstances, entire new cloathing was ordered to be made up, for the 12 regiments, calculating them, as complete, and the former stock expended. The Complement for these regiments is 8448 non commissioned officers and privates but by the last returns forwarded to me, 3399 only, were enlisted; since the date of those returns, no doubt further enlistments have been made, will these however when added made a total exceeding 4000?
Cloathing for the whole number, for the 12 regiments compleat was made and forwarded within the last year. The application of the suits is not supposed to exceed the numbers enlisted—which taken at 4000—would leave a surpluss at the different depots and subject to the orders of the proper officers—of 4,448 suits which may and ought to be applied to the wants of the ensuing year.
Some Regiments however being nearly compleat, will have applied nearly all their cloathing for the last year—others however, have few men and have applied few suits. Such circumstances will induce the necessity of appropriating the surpluss cloathing of the different regiments, beyond what has been expended, or will be required for such deficient regiments for the ensuing year to the cloathing of the more compleat regiments for the year 1800. This surpluss cloathing it is presumed is depositted with the different Paymasters of Regiments. It will require your orders to make returns, of what will remain in their hands respectively—after deducting the supply for each regiment for the current year—or where there is a deficiency—the exact statement of it.
When these returns are obtained, it is thought it will be best, to direct the Quarter Master General to provide for transporting the surpluss cloathing, that will be at many places, to such regiments as require it. Should any orders from me be necessary, in this business, they will immediately issue upon your intimating it.
I enclose a copy of regulations, adopted by this Department, respecting the allowance of Barracks, or Quarters, to the officers of the army, and of fuel to General Officers, and the Staff of the Army, which I have desired the Accountant to consider, as directory, in all Accounts, to which they may be applicable.
I have the honor to be, with great Respect, Sir,   Your Most Obedient Servant

James McHenry
Major General
Alexander Hamilton


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to James McHenry, 7 March 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: McHenry, James

New York, March 7, 1800. States that the “law which provides for Brigade and Division Inspectors has made them no allowance for the article of forage.…” Quotes an order he has given to James Wilkinson on this question. Encloses extract of a letter from John F. Hamtramck on Indian affairs.


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to James McHenry, 7 March 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: McHenry, James

N York March 7th 1800
Sir
Mr. Ethan A. Brown has acted, for some time, in my office, in the character of Assistant Secretary; and I shall continue to have occasion for his services. It would therefore be gratifying to me if the President would bestow on him the appointment of second Lieutenant in the twelfth regiment. Mr: Brown has heretofore received a monthly salary. Should he be appointed to the office of Lieutenant he can be supported by its emoluments.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from James Wilkinson, 7 March 1800
From: Wilkinson, James
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Natchez Head Quarters [Mississippi Territory] March 7th 1800
Sir;
I wrote you on the 27th Ulto. over land, via Fort Washington agreeably to the enclosed duplicate, which was accompanied by the papers and documents therein mentioned.
I avail myself of a safe opportunity to New Orleans, to send this to our Consul there, Mr Jones, with directions for its transmittal by sea, for your satisfaction and that of the Executive.

The garrisons of Fort McHenry and Sargent are ordered to evacuate those posts, and will in the course of the ensuing week, be incorporated with that of Fort Adams, the national barrier on the Mississippi; and the proposed transfers and organization of the detachments, will take place so soon as the muster and inspection rolls which have been ordered are completed.
I hear nothing of the approach of Lieut. Col. Gaither, whose presence here will be highly necessary, anterior to my departure; I propose to wait for him until the 15th or 20th of the next month, but no later.
On my arrival at New Orleans, I found the Captain of the Snow laden with ordnance &c, which preceded me at that place had very improperly handed the manifest of her cargo, to the Spanish Custom house. It became indispensable I should immediately know whether permission would be given to the passage of the articles intended for Fort Stoddert, thro’ the Spanish dominions; and also whether any objections would be made to the Snow’s ascent of the river; and I at the same time discovered, that our Consul Mr. Jones had not been received, and that the exequator of the Vice Consul Mr. Hulings had been revoked. Under these circumstances the correspondence No 1. took place, in which I succeeded to accomplish my immediate views and to procure some official consideration for Mr. Jones, which may I hope meet approbation.
The military officers of Louisiana testify every respect to the American commission; I was received at several posts, with the honors due to my rank, and the day after my arrival at New Orleans, the Governor paid me a visit of ceremony, at the head of the Officers of the Garrison and of the Militia: and it may be proper to add, that in all things his conduct has appeared, so far, to correspond with his professions.
You have also under cover No 2. a letter from the Governor of Louisiana, with my answer, respecting Mr. Bowles, which may I hope prove satisfactory; it is believed that the British connive at the conduct of Bowles, but it is doubtful whether he acts under a commission; whatever may be the fact, or whatever his intentions, his proclamations and other measures have a mischievous tendency, in relation to our interests, and are highly disrespectful. The sympathies and attachments among Indians of the same nation are indissoluble, and of course a commotion or discontent excited in one tribe however insignificant, may soon extend itself to others more powerful, and when once their passions are put in motion, they will find vent, and are easily turned to the purposes of an artful agent. The Spaniards have been greatly alarmed, by the vapourings of Mr. Bowles, but for my own part, I must confess I consider him a vain boaster; yet should the British contemplate an attack on New Orleans and Pensacola, which from Jamaica would be readily practicable and certain of success, or should the same power look forward to a rupture with the United States, Bowles views may be solid, extensive and pernicious. He should therefore be well watched on the side of Georgia and if he could be put out of the way on fair principles, I think it would be well.
I shall direct the Asst. Quarter Master General to offer the ruins of Fort Sargent and Fort M’Henry with their appendages to public sale for the national account, and to apply the proceeds to the works of Fort Adams, should purchasers be found.
The ordnance Brig is ascending the river but I have no information, by which to mark her progress or present position.
Capt. Guion will sail for the seat of government in the course of the month, and by him, should no earlier occasion present, I will again have the honor to address you. With perfect consideration and respect, I am Sir,
Your most obedt. servant

Ja: Wilkinson
Major General,
Alexander Hamilton.


Title: To Alexander Hamilton from William S. Smith, 8 March 1800
From: Smith, William Stephens
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Union Brigade [Scotch Plains, New Jersey] March 8th. 1800
Major General Hamilton
Sir
Nothing but a point of the most delicate Honor, could have induced me to leave this Cantoonment for 12 Hours, without having previously obtained your permission as Commanding General, but the situation of that pledge is such, that I am under the necessity of presenting myself to you, without obtaining that permission. I shall do myself the Honor of presenting myself to you on monday at 12 oClock, when the reasons I shall give, for so doing will I doubt not be fully Satisfactory. I have the honor to be
Sir. Your most obed Humble Sert.

W. S. Smith of the 12th.

N.B. would it not be best to order Colo. Ogden here immediately.


Title: From Alexander Hamilton to James McHenry, 9 March 1800
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: McHenry, James

[New York] March 9. 1800
Dr Sir
Some ill health joined to much occupation has delayed longer than I wished the preparation of the Bills you desired. Herewith I send you one of them.
I regret extremely the dismembrement of the School of the Navy from the rest. Clear I am that all ought to be united under the Director General who might himself be subject to the orders of the Secretary at War in relation to the three first Schools of the Navy in relation to the last. There is a manifest incongruity in the idea of a Fundamental School imbracing the Navy and that of the separation of the School of the Navy. This elementary institution may without impropriety & with much advantage be united. To be at the same place will facilitate instruction & conduce to œconomy. To be at the same place without union will lead to collision & disorder
I have not filled up the particulars to be taught in each school. Your report seems to contemplate something different from my plan & yet does not present the detail. That which was in my plan was maturely thought of. The main difference seems to be that you regard the business of the other schools (except the fundamental) to be the application of what is learnt in the fundamental school to the practical purpose of the others. My plan supposes that it is not necessary or proper in the fundamental school to do more than give that elementary instruction which is equally necessary for all the corps—leaving the higher branches necessary for particular corps to be pursued in the appropriate schools. The one idea or the other requires a very different distribution of the branches to be taught. You can easily fill the blanks as you finally take the one or the other course. If you prefer the scheme in my letter you will only have to insert from it verbatim or nearly so the objects to be taught in each School.
You will observe some auxiliary ideas incorporated but they have an eye to the results in your report. The principal alteration is the latitude in the first instance as to the appointment of Director General. I think it very probable that a more fit character for this important trust may now be found out of the army than in it.
Another difference is that small additional compensations are proposed for Directors who may be Officers. It will be I fear impracticable to find fit men willing to undertake the constant drudgery of these stations without some additional rewards.
Yrs truly

AH

I have put between Brackets what may be omitted to accommodate the Bill intirely to your Report.