Title: To George Washington from Alexander Addison, 6 July 1799
From: Addison, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Sir
Philadelphia July 6th 1799

I should have sooner informed you if I could have seen or ascertained what sum of money you might expect on the last instalment of your Bond on M. Ritchie. That instalment was $3116.40 of which sum I have this day paid into the Bank of Pennsylvania one half together with interest on that half from the first of last month making together $1568. The instalment due at June 1798 was $3292.80. Interest on that to 11th July 1798 was $21.95; making together $3314.75 I then paid $1700 which is more than half the principal and the whole of the interest at that time due.
It may be proper to state to you (because I know not that you are acquainted with) the reason of my making these two payments in this manner. When Col. Ritchie (who was a man of integrity and property) proposed to Mr Ross the purchase of your lands on Miller’s run he pressed me to be concerned in the bargain. Having no means at command to make the payments I declined but on his assuring me that if the first payment could be made, he would provide for the others I agreed and though my name appears not in the contract I have half the interest in the land. Col. Ritchie’s bond was as good as his and mine together and the whole land is bound by a mortgage to you. By our joint exertions the first instalment was paid with as much punctuality as could be exacted. The quantity of land was not ascertained at the time of the contract so

that a bond for the precise sum could not be taken then; nor was it known to us before the day of payment of the first instalment so that we could not remit the precise sum. But we paid before the day a sum supposed equal to the first instalment of principal and interest. The difficulty of remitting money delayed the payment of the second instalment till my coming to this city at my usual time for attendance in the Court of Errors and Appeals. It was then paid with all the interest that could be exacted. Before the third instalment became due Col. Ritchie died. Lands from a variety of causes (which you can estimate better than I) had begun to sink in value and we could not make sales nor obtain payments. From his death I considered myself bound to provide for the half; but I could not do it but in this city. Almost all the payment which I made on the third instalment and all on the last I have made by discounting notes at the Bank and however hard a way of raising money this may be I would submit to much harder than fail in any obligation.
With respect to the sum yet due I have early earnestly and frequently pressed the brother and widow of Col. Ritchie with the importance and necessity in point of both interest and honour to provide for their part of the payments. I have shewn your letters particularly the last which I had the honour of receiving from you on this subject and expectations of money being paid have been held out to me. These however have yet produced nothing. Mrs Ritchie is now in Philadelphia. I have endeavored to press on her friends here (whose advice on this head might be considered as more disinterested than mine) the danger of further delinquency. I shall continue to do so and if I receive any positive information during my stay next week in this city I shall do myself the honour of informing you.
This state is greatly agitated by the approach of the election of Governor. There is good reason to believe that Mr Ross will be chosen. But the whole spirit of party will be exerted against him and they speak also with confidence. This however would be the case were any other proper person the candidate: and I know none more proper or more likely to succeed than he. His success would be of important benefit to the state & the union. The Governor’s influence by appointments to office, mischievous printers, and the great importation of Irish are the bane of the political (and of course moral) character of Pennsylvania: and its influence on the Union is great. With most cordial wishes for your health

and happiness and with the highest respect and esteem, I have the honour to be Sir Your most obedt Servt

Alexr Addison


Title: From George Washington to James McHenry, 7 July 1799
From: Washington, George
To: McHenry, James

 PrivateMy dear Sir,
Mount Vernon 7th July 1799

I have duly received your private letter of the 29th Ulto with its enclosures, and return your letters to and from General Hamilton.
In my letter to Genl Hamilton, which has been before you, you find I have fully expressed my opinion on the expediency—regarding circumstances—of promoting General Wilkinson to the Rank of Major General and I am always willing to give publicity to any sentiment which I have expressed in this way, if circumstances should require or render it proper. But as the appointment of other Officers of high rank has been made, not only without my recommendation, but even without my knowledge, I cannot see the necessity (much less after the intimations which appear in your letter to General Hamilton respecting this Gentleman) of my writing an official letter on this subject. Permit me, moreover to say, that it would seem as if, when doubts or difficulties present themselves, I am called upon to sanction the measure, and thereby take a responsibility upon myself; and in other cases, to which no blame may be attached, my opinions & inclinations are not consulted.

In giving my ideas in this manner I do not mean, my dear Sir, to express any disgust because I have not been consulted on every military appointment; but to show that there ought, in my opinion, to be consistency and uniformity observed in these matters.
I am very sorry that Colo. Howard and General Lloyd have declined making a Selection of persons for Officering the eventual army from Maryland. If my knowledge of characters in that State, was equal to theirs, or to yours, I should not hesitate a moment in undertaking what you request; but the fact is, my acquaintance there is very limited; and I find I have already undertaken more, in this State, than I shall be able to accomplish to my own satisfaction; from the difficulties which have been suggested in my former letters. Indeed, it would be concealment, not to declare, that I see no other mode of making the selection in so expanded a State as Virga (on the principle of distribution, according to population) than by having recourse to some such expedient as was suggested in a former letter of mine (in order to make the Presidents intentions generally known, and to give to all parts thereof an opportunity of making a tender of their military services)—or, by dividing the State into as many districts as there are Regiments to be raised in it, and in each District to make choice of the most eligable character for the command thereof—authorising him, either alone, or with the aid of his field Officers to select the company officers therefrom for consideration.
The first of these modes you have objected to; and the second is not free from exceptions; but the fact is, that I have been so little in this State for the last twenty five years, as to be utterly unable to accomplish your views without the aid of others; and those who could assist me most, having only a Commune interest therein, do not (for the reasons which I presume operated on Messrs Howard & Lloyd) incline to commit themselves in such delicate business, where nothing they do is conclusive.
General Marshall (one of those whose aid I solicited) is gone to Kentucky; From General Lee, who discovered no promptness in the first instance, to give any assistance, I have not since heard a Syllable; and with respect to Genl Morgan, his recommendations are confined to a very narrow circle; I shall, notwithstandg, continue my endeavours to carry your request into effect, in this State, but can promise no favourable result from the present plan. With

sincere esteem & regard—I am—My dear Sir Your Obedt and Affecte Servt

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to James McHenry, 7 July 1799
From: Washington, George
To: McHenry, James

Sir,
Mount Vernon July 7th 1799

I have considered, with attention, the Rules adopted by the President of the U.S. relative to rank & promotion in the Army, which were enclosed in your letter of the 2d inst. wherein you request me to suggest any alterations which may appear proper, to make them more perfect. These Rules meet my full approbatn, and I see no inconvenience that can arise from the establishment of them unless it be in the following clause—“Provided always that Colonels who were deranged shall take rank of Lieutenant Colonels who served to the end of the War.” You will recollect, that, before the close of the Revolutionary War, the title of Colonel was abolished in the American Army, to obviate some difficulties which arose in the exchange of prisoners, and that the title of Lieutenant Colonel Commandant was substituted in its place, to which rank was attached all the command, privileges and dignity which before appertained to that of Colonel. Now, may there not have been some persons at the close of the war, ranking as Lieutenant Colonels, who before held the Rank of Colonel, and who were older officers in that Rank than some who were deranged? If this should be the case difficulties may arise. You, having the dates of Commissions &c. to refer to, are better able to judge than I am, how far this may operate in the present case, and what attention it deserves. I therefore submit it to your considerations. Agreeably

to your request, I return the Rules which you forwarded to me, and I have the honor to be with due consideration Sir Yr Mo. Ob. St


Title: From George Washington to Daniel Marshal, 7 July 1799 [letter not found]
From: Washington, George
To: Marshal, Daniel

Letter not found: to Daniel Marshal, 7 July 1799. In the docket of Daniel Marshal’s letter to GW of 30 June, Lear wrote “acknowledged July 7:99.” King V. Hostick advertised the ALS for sale in 1962 under the date of 5 July.


Title: From George Washington to William Roberts, 8 July 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Roberts, William

Mr Roberts
Mount Vernon 8th July 1799

As you have agreed to ⟨come⟩ upon the terms I have mentioned ⟨in the letter to⟩ you. Nothing therefore ⟨illegible to be said on that⟩ head. But as upon consideration of the Subject, I had rather you should ⟨come⟩ before my present Miller goes away ⟨illegible⟩ a good deal of flour in my Mill which requires judgment to preserve; ⟨illegible the⟩ Mill will require to ⟨illegible⟩ the present scarcity of Water; it would, if you could make it convenient to yourself, be agreeable to me, that you should be here before the 10th of August, the expiration of my present Millers Se⟨rvice, or⟩ even sooner than that, might ⟨illegible⟩ to me. Let me hear from you immediately upon receipt of this letter, ⟨and if you⟩ cannot come as soon as it is wished and point out if you can any mode for preserving my flour which is growing musty & Sour with ⟨illegible⟩ I can accept, I wish you would ⟨illegible⟩ I am Your friend & ⟨illegible⟩

Go: Washington

P.S. If you have any thing to bring round there are Vessels frequently coming hither from Richmond. Colo. Gilpin I believe has one. Having erected a Distillery at my Mill a Well has been sunk for the use of it wch furnishes excellent water.


Title: From George Washington to Benjamin Stoddert, 10 July 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Stoddert, Benjamin

Sir,
Mount Vernon July 10th 1799

When I quitted the Chair of Government it was my full determination not to apply to the Executive in behalf of any person for an appointment, knowing the trouble and inconvenience which I must experience myself as well as give to othe[r]s without forming this resolution. In some instances I have, however, been obliged to depart from this rule, where, from particular connexions or circumstances I am called upon to be the channel of application in a way that I cannot refuse, without being thought unkind or uncivil.

But as few instances of this kind occur, I shall not have occasion to trouble you often in this way.
Inclosed is a letter from General Spotswood, expressing a wish to have one of his sons appointed a Midshipman in the Navy of the U.S.—As I am unacquainted with the regulations established in your department with respect to appointments, I am not able to judge how far the request made by Genl Spotswood for his Son can be complied with. On this you will determine; and whatever answer you may think proper to give, I will thank you to transmit to me that I may forward it accordingly.
As I have no personal knowledge of the young man, altho. a relation of mine, I cannot say how far he may be qualified for the place which is asked. I have the honor to be with due consideration Sir, Yr mo. Ob. St

G. W——n


Title: To George Washington from William Roberts, 12 July 1799
From: Roberts, William
To: Washington, George

Sir
Petersburgh 12th July 1799

I am Very Sorry to hare you have had the Misfortune to have your flour Damnefied As you Rite Me it is—Boath Muste & Sower. then thare is but One way to preserve it, tharefore to keep it from Giting wors—Order your prasent Miller to Start it Amedeately in the Meal Loft And Take A packt Barrel of flour And have it well Cleand to Role it over all the Lumps To Mash tham fine—then Sift it thorough a Sand Siv Or A Bean Siv to Git out all the Lumps then hist Up Bran And Mix it to the Temper of Ground Meal—that will Giv it Are by Turning it Morning & Evening Twise or three Times A Day it will Gro No wors Till I Can Come Up Which will be as Soon As I Reseve your Letter And Settle My Affares before Mr Hay & Captn Mcnemara—which will be in the Beginning of August—Now if I Could Git So Far in your favour As to wright to my atturney Mr George Hay & Captn Macnemara My atturney And Agent To push on Matters & Spare Not Money in Reson So As to Recover My property out of the hands of Two Vile

Men in this Town Boath of infamaous Caracters ⟨I⟩ Would Leve the whole affare in the hands of Captn Macnemara & Mr George Hay My atturney—Sir—I think a Letter from your Excellency to those Two Gentlemen would be of Infinet Servis to Me in Giting My property out of thare hands.
Sir—Maneg the flour as I have Derected & it will Gro No Wors till I Can Come Up which will be as Soon as I Receiv your Letter—For your Righting for Me has already put Me More in favour with Mr Hay & Captn Macnemara then Before—Now Sir to Acquint with My Cretekel Setuation I think it My Duty So to Doe And Should be Glad to Come at the Time your preasent Millers Time Expiers But Last fall in the month of October & Novr I was Taken Vary ill & had Like to a Lost my Life, while in My Destress a Villen who Came to Se Me And Not Sent for Nither—in pertence of frindship And has Got a frind of his to Draw a Counter fit Deed for my Place but I have a witness Now in Town that was By in all my Destress which will over set the Villens Intent—Next August Cort which Comes on the first Monday in the Month if youd by So Kind as to Rite to Loyer Hay in My behalf it would be More in My favour then all the fee I Can Be Able to Giv him—Sir I have the first Loyer in Petersburgh On My Side—And I hope Matters will Go on well after I Receiv Your Letter. From Sir your Sencere frind And Humble Servt

W:M. Roberts


Title: To George Washington from Jeremiah Olney, 13 July 1799 [letter not found]
From: Olney, Jeremiah
To: Washington, George

Letter not found: from Jeremiah Olney, 13 July 1799. On 4 Aug. GW wrote Olney: “Your favor of the 13th Ulto . . . has been duly received.”


Title: To George Washington from William Augustine Washington, 13 July 1799
From: Washington, William Augustine
To: Washington, George

My Dr Sir
Haywood July 13th 1799

Judge Washington intending to Mount Vernon I imbrace the opportunity of acknowledging rect of your Letter of the 10th Ulto

with Mr Andersons, incl⟨os⟩ing the Acct between us for Corn; which is very accurate, & satisfactory—On the 15th June I drew on you in favr of Walker Roe & Co. for £⟨illegible⟩ payable 60 days after sight, and yesterday I d⟨rew⟩ in favr of Robt Patton for £100 pay 30 days after sight; I hope it will be perfectly convenient to y⟨ou⟩ to pay these drafts at the time they become d⟨ue⟩ nothing but the strongest necessity could have compelled me to have drawn on you, after ⟨your⟩ mentioning your disappointments, & pressing ⟨mutilated⟩ for money—Flood has not as yet called on me for a draft for his money; its possable he may have applyed personally, without an order from me, if he should do so you will be pleased to settle with him, I have left in your hands after my two drafts £8.7.8 which I wish to get Whiskey for my workmen, and if I can get ⟨a⟩ Vessel to call for it will thank you to send me.
If I continue to enjoy my health its my intention, with Mrs Washington to Visit you in September, if you should be at home at that time, It is a visit I have long intended and wished for, but the misfortunes in my family ⟨and⟩ my own indisposition has prevented it. Mrs Washington unites with me in our best respects to you and Mrs Washington wishing you health and happiness, conclud⟨es⟩ Your Affectionate Nephew

Wm Augt. Washington


Title: From George Washington to James McAlpin, 14 July 1799
From: Washington, George
To: McAlpin, James

Sir,
Mount Vernon July 14th 1799

Your letters of the 24th & 27th Ulto have come duly to hand; and, persuaded as I am that, you have used your best endeavours to furnish my uniform Coat, agreeably to the regulations of the War department, I thank you for your exertions; although they have failed of the desired effect.
Some years ago (while the Governmt was in New York) I had a cloke well embroidered there (at the instance of a Mr Bahr, who was then my Taylor)—possibly, the same person, or some other, might be found there still, to do it, if Mr Bahr is living & was applied to.
If a failure takes place there also, and the coat is not already embarked for Europe, let it remain at present, and inform me of the state of, and what can be done with it. I am Sir Your Very Hble Servant

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to William Thornton, 14 July 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Thornton, William

Dear Sir
Mount Vernon 14th July 1799

Be so good as to learn from Mr Blagden, and inform me, at what time—and what sum, the next advance must be, that I may be making arrangements therefor.

If nothing happens more than I am aware of at present, I shall be in George Town on the first Monday in next Month (August the 5th) at the annual Meeting of the Pot[oma]c Compy and should be glad to know previously thereto, when, and what the requirement of Mr Blagden will be.
The generally received opinion is, that my houses in the City are engaged by Mr Francis, and I have no objection to Mr Francis becoming the occupier of them; but the matter is quite loose yet, between us; and ought to be fixed; otherwise the idea of their being engaged, will prevent offers from others; and I may be compelled to accept of such Rent as he shall think proper to offer when their wants are supplied.
Viewing the matter in this light, it is expedient that I should fix on a certain percentage on the cost of this property, which can be ascertained to a fraction, and know, in time whether he will give it as a Rent.
I am not disposed to fix this at an unreasonable rate; on the contrary, I had rather be under, than over a just standard: but I must not lose, because I do not mean to extort. In a word, I wish to know what others, who are building in the vicinity of the Capital (on the principle which has governed me—namely—the accomodation of Congress—) mean to ask as an interest on their expenditures; and if it should fall in your way to make this enquiry I would thank you for the result, as it will enable me to speak decisively to Mr Francis. with esteem & regard—I remain Dear Sir Your Most Obedt & Obliged Humble Servant

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to Alexander Spotswood, 15 July 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Spotswood, Alexander

Dear Sir,
Mount Vernon 15th July 1799

Your wishes, respecting your Son George, I have communicated to the Secretary of the Navy; although it is contrary to a determination I had entered into (when I left the Chair of Government) not to be the medium through which applications for appointments should be made; and from which I have not (before) deviated, except in the Military line, since it has been made my duty, consequent of my own appointment, to present them.
If the Secretary of the Navy should return any answer to my letter, you will be informed of the purport of it. I must question, however, whether your proposition will comport with the rules of the Navy Department. In a word, I should not suppose that any persons will be received as Midshipmen, until they enter the ship, and perform the duties. The contrary (as I know the applications are numerous) would carry with it an appearance of favoratism which I should think, our government ⟨would⟩ not wish to be charged with.
If in the Military line, any characters should present themselves to you ⟨which are right⟩ly deserving of Regimental appointments, I shall be obliged to you for sending in their names to me; as the Secretary of War has requested me ⟨to be⟩ provided with these, in case the President, ⟨in⟩ the recess of Congress, shd ⟨think it⟩ expedient to raise the eventual ⟨Army of⟩ twenty four Regiments. Field & ⟨Artillery⟩ Officers for four Regiments, ⟨illegible⟩ated through this

State, as near⟨ly as⟩ may be to the population of the dif⟨ferent⟩ parts, will be required, if this measure should take place.
I would thank you for asking, (when an opportunity presents itself) the Executor or person who has the keeping ⟨of the⟩ late Mr James Mercer’s Papers, for ⟨a con⟩veyance from “George & James Mercer Esqrs., & Messrs Lindo [&] Cozenove to me” ⟨the⟩ land purchased of them on four Mile run in this County. Having occasion to overhaul my land Papers lately this conveyance was ⟨missing illegible;⟩ but the following Memo ⟨illegible⟩ (that is the one just mentioned was sent March 15th 1787 to ⟨illegible⟩ to draw a Deed of ⟨conveyance illegible⟩.
This confirming ⟨illegible⟩ properly executed & recorded ⟨illegible⟩ other could not have been ⟨illegible⟩ as it is not to be found among my Papers. It is useless to ⟨any illegible⟩ and is no otherwise essential ⟨illegible⟩ recorded) than in case of accident to the records; and for the ⟨illegible⟩ of having my title ⟨illegible⟩ possession, that reco⟨rding⟩ may ⟨illegible⟩ them more easily.
All here are well, and unite in best regards to yourself ⟨illegible⟩ & the family, with Dear Sir, Your Most Obedient Affecte Hble Servt

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to William Roberts, 17 July 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Roberts, William

Mr Roberts
Mount Vernon 17th July 1799

Your letter of the 12th instant is received, and I am obliged to you for the advice respecting the management of the flour I had on hand; which however, is less necessary now, as I have disposed of it all.
I should be glad to render you any consistent Service in my power, but must decline writing to the Gentleman you have mentioned, on the subject proposed; first, because I am entirely unacquainted with the circumstances attending your ⟨disputed⟩ property; and secondly, because I have not the honor to be acquainted with Mr Hay or Captn McNamara, who you inform me are employed to defend that property.
Gentlemen of the character you (no doubt deservedly) give Mr Hay & Captn McNamara, can stand in no need of a stimula from me to rescue your property from a fraudulent conveyance, & thereby enable you to come to me the sooner. I wish you well & ⟨am your⟩ friend

Go: Washington


Title: To George Washington from Timothy Pickering, 18 July 1799
From: Pickering, Timothy
To: Washington, George

(private)
Sir,Philadelphia July 18, 1799.
I am honoured with your letter of the 14th. La Fayette will not come to America as a minister: On the 13th instant I received a private letter from Mr Murray dated the 16th of April, inclosing one from Pichon, dated the 12th, written with Talleyrand’s privity, and indeed by his order. Pichon is eager to be the first to announce to Murray the message of the President nominating him to be the envoy to negociate with France: and expresses the “impatience with which Talleyrand waits for the letter in which he hopes Mr Murray will not delay to demand of him the passports for Paris.”
Mr Murray, apparently well pleased with the thing, says he shall write Pichon a polite answer; but wait instructions from his own government: and should he have occasion to write for passports, will address himself to Talleyrand alone.
Talleyrand also desired Pichon “to assure Mr Murray of the eagerness which he personally feels to see him at Paris.” and upon the whole, Pichon “affirms his persuasion, . . . from the point of view in which he (Murray) is known to Talleyrand, of the facility with which he will be listened to on the essential points.”
It is on this information, that I have said La Fayette will not come to the U. States as a minister: We have anticipated the wishes of the French Government, by nominating an Envoy—& these Envoys, to present themselves at the Luxemburg. Or if that Government should not wait the arrival of our Envoys, it will be because disasters press upon them too rapidly and too heavily to hazard any delay.

(Confidential) But whether envoys go or come, I expect no treaty—unless the French Government stands ready to do us compleat justice. We shall not again waive any of our rights, or postpone their claim and admission. This has been resolved. I am very respectfully, Sir, your most obt Servt

Timothy Pickering


Title: From George Washington to Jonathan Trumbull, Jr., 21 July 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Trumbull, Jonathan Jr.

My dear Sir,
Mount Vernon 21st July 1799

Your favour of the 22d Ulto got to my hands yesterday, only. It came safe, and without any apparent marks of violence; but whence the length of its passage, I am unable to inform you.
To you, and to your brother Colo. Jno. Trumbull, I feel much indebted for the full, frank, and interesting communication of the political sentiments contained in both your letters.
The project of the latter is vast—and under any circumstances would require very mature consideration; but in its extent, and an eye being had to the disorganizing Party in the United States, I am sure it would be impracticable in the present order of things.
Not being able to convey my ideas to you, on this subject, in more concise terms than I have already done to your brother, in answer to the letter he informs you he had written to me, I shall take the liberty of giving you an extract thereof—as follow.
“For the Political information contained in it (that is his letter) I feel grateful, as I always shall for the free, & unreserved communication of your sentiments upon subjects so important in their nature, and tendency. No well informed, and unprejudiced man, who has viewed with attention the conduct of the French Government since the Revolution in that Country, can mistake its objects, or the tendency of the ambitious projects it is pursuing. Yet, strange as it may seem, a party, and a powerful one too, among us, affect to believe that the measures of it are dictated by a principle of self preservation; that the outrages of which the Directory are guilty, proceed from dire necessity; that it wishes to be upon the most friendly & amicable terms with the United States; that it will be the fault of the latter if this is not the case; that the defensive measures which this Country have adopted, are not only unnecessary & expensive, but have a tendency to produce the evil

which, to deprecate, is mere pretence in the Government; because War with France they say, is its wish; that on the Militia we shd rest our security; and that it is time enough to call upon these, when the danger is imminent, & apparent.
“With these, and such like ideas, attempted to be inculcated upon the public mind (aided by prejudices not yet eradicated) and with art, and Sophistry, whi⟨ch⟩ regard neither truth nor decency; attacking every character, without respect to persons—public or Private, who happen to differ from themselves in Politics, I leave you to decide on the probability of carrying such an extensive plan of defence as you have suggested in your last letter, into operation; and in the short period which you suppose may be allowed to accomplish it in.”
I come now, my dear Sir, to pay particular attention to that part of Your Letter which respects myself.
I remember well, the conversation which you allude to, and have not forgot the answer I gave you. In my judgment it applies with as much force now, as then; nay more, because at that time the line between Parties was not so clearly drawn, and the views of the opposition, so clearly developed as they are at present; of course, allowing your observation (as it respects myself) to be founded, personal influence would be of no avail.
Let that party set up a broomstick, and call it a true son of Liberty, a Democrat, or give it any other epithet that will suit their purpose, and it will command their votes in toto! Will not the Federalists meet, or rather defend their cause, on the opposite ground? Surely they must, or they will discover a want of Policy, indicative of weakness, & pregnant of mischief; which cannot be admitted. Wherein then would lye the difference between the present Gentleman in Office, & myself?
It would be matter of sore regret to me, if I could believe that a serious thot was turned towards me as his successor; not only as it respects my ardent wishes to pass through the vale of life in retiremt, undisturbed in the remnant of the days I have to sojourn here, unless called upon to defend my Country (which every citizen is bound to do)—but on Public ground also; for although I have abundant cause to be thankful for the good health with whh I am blessed, yet I am not insensible to my declination in other respects. It would be criminal therefore in me, although it should be the wish of my Country men, and I could be elected, to accept

an Office under this conviction, which another would discharge with more ability; and this too at a time when I am thoroughly convinced I should not draw a single vote from the Anti-federal side; and of course, should stand upon no stronger ground than any other Federal character well supported; & when I should become a mark for the shafts of envenomed malice, and the basest calumny to fire at; when I should be charged not only with irresolution, but with concealed ambition, which wants only an occasion to blaze out; and, in short, with dotage and imbicility.
All this I grant, ought to be like dust in the balance, when put in compet[it]ion with a great public good, when the accomplishment of it is apparent. But as no problem is better defined in my mind than that principle, not men, is now, and will be, the object of contention; and that I could not obtain a solitary vote from that Party; that any other respectable Federal character would receive the same suffrages that I should; that at my time of life, (verging towards three score & ten) I should expose myself without rendering any essential service to my Country, or answering the end contemplated: Prudence on my part must arrest any attempt at the well meant, but mistaken views of my friends, to introduce me again into the Chair of Government.
Lengthy as this letter is, I cannot conclude it without expressing an earnest wish that, some intimate & confidential friend of the Presidents would give him to understand that, his long absence from the Seat of Government in the present critical conjuncture, affords matter for severe animadversion by the friends of government; who speak of it with much disappobation; while the other Party chuckle at and set it down as a favourable omen for themselves. It has been suggested to me to make this Communication, but I have declined it, conceiving that it would be better received from a private character—m⟨ore⟩ in the habits of social intercourse and friendship. With the most sincere friendship, and Affectionate regard, I am always, Your Obedient Servant

Go: Washington


Title: To George Washington from Richard Kidder Meade, 22 July 1799 [letter not found]
From: Meade, Richard Kidder
To: Washington, George

Letter not found: from Richard Kidder Meade, 22 July 1799. On 12 Aug. GW wrote Meade that he “should have acknowledged the receipt of your favor of the 22d Ultimo.”


Title: From George Washington to James McHenry, 24 July 1799
From: Washington, George
To: McHenry, James

Sir,
Mount Vernon July 24th 1799

I have received your letter of the 19th inst. enclosing recommendns of sundry persons in Kanhawa County for Military appointmts—These shall be Ret[urne]d in due time, agreeably to your desire.
I forward to you a letter from Gustavus B. Wallace Junr of King

George County, requesting an appointment in the present Cavalry. I am entirely unacquainted with the Applicant, and have had no opportunity of making any enquiries of the Gentln to whom he refers. I have the honor to be with due consideration Sir, Yr Mo. Ob. St

G. W——n


Title: To George Washington from Daniel Morgan, 24 July 1799
From: Morgan, Daniel
To: Washington, George

Sir
Soldiers Rest July 24th 1799

I take the liberty to transmit you a duplicate of a letter sent to the Honble the Secretary of War and Major Genl Hamilton.
Dear Sir
I beg leave to say something in favor of Major James Stephenson who I have recommended to the commander in chief. Although his conduct in the military line speaks louder in his praise than I can yet at the same time I would wish to say something. I think he would command a Regiment with as much propriety perhaps as any man who will be in the service of any country, he commanded a Company in the Army commanded by Genl St Clair in the year 1791 with great propriety and at the defeat of that Officer on the 4th of November he rendered very singular service, in addition to what has already been said he is a great disciplinarian and of Course will be a great acquis[i]tion to a new raised Army, he is also a man of good Character and education, and firmly attached to Government.
I would also beg leave to mention to you Capt. James Glenn of Berkley County Virginia who also served with Genl St Clair when he was defeated and who distinguished himself in the action and rendered great service in securing the retreat, he wishes to get into the service; I need not say more of Capt. Glenn, as a man who retains his recollection in so shocking a defeat as that was don’t

want fortitude; he has not mentioned to me what rank he wishes but it is my opinion he will command a Company with very great propriety—Mr Bushrod Taylor of Frederick County who is a man of great cleverness wishes to join the Army, at the head of a Company if he can get it, he served with me in 1794 against the Insurgents with great propriety, is a man of good Character and Education, and firmly attached to the federal Government.
Capt. Edmund Taylor in Colonel Parkers regiment and Capt. Wm K. Blue of Colo. Bentleys regt wish to be appointed Brigade Majors to the General Officers who will command the Brigade they belong to, which they expect will be General William Washington; they are both good officers and have been in the regular service, which I believe they are acquainted with; they both wish me to mention them to you which I have done. I have the honor to be Sir with very great esteem your Obt Hle Sert

Danl Morgan


Title: To George Washington from James Ross, 24 July 1799
From: Ross, James
To: Washington, George

Dear Sir
Pittsburgh 24 July 1799

When your letter of the 26 Ulto reached this place, I was abroad in the Western territory, but since my return I have learned upon enquiry, that Colo. Shreve is in a very low state of health; that the Sheriff Spared him for some time in consequence of a letter from you and his own fair promises, but that as yet no money is made

on the execution issued in last Autumn. I have written to a gentleman of the law in Union Town directing him to oblige the Sheriff to collect the money without delay, and at the same time to apprize Colo. Shreve that an Execution will go out for the installment due last June unless it is immediately paid.
Mr Addison & John Ritchie (the brother & heir of Colo. Ritchie) are now in Philadelphia, where I am in hopes they will pay what is due to you⟨,⟩ but I can say nothing with certainty on that Subject as they had left this country before the arrival of your letter. I have left notice for them to give me information whenever they reach home which will be in a few days. Had Colo. Ritchie lived there would have been no want of punctuality in your payments, but his brother has not the same means, nor the same established credit to raise money; And Mr Addison tho’ a man of property, has not the command of cash to any considerable extent. As Soon as any additonal information can be had, it shall be immediately transmitted & in the mean While I shall press all the parties to come forward with all arrearages.
When I left the city of Philada in March there was a considerable sum to my credit in the Bank of Pennsa, but no money on your account, nor have I any advice of a payment there since I left it. If money has been deposited there for you, the person who left it has omitted to give me notice and my Bank Book being at this place it is impossible that I could be apprised of such a payment without letter. I will write to Philadelphia and direct a payment of any Sum which may be there for your Use, but I am persuaded that there is little probability of Your deriving any advantage from Such an order.
I beg that you will without any hesitation let me know when & how I can render you any service in your affairs here, as it will always afford me the most sincere pleasure to aid you in effecting an adjustment of your concerns in this country and to transmit every information respecting them which may be useful. With the highest respect I have the honour to remain Dear Sir Your Most Obedient and Most humble Servant

James Ross


Title: To George Washington from Alexander Spotswood, 25 July 1799
From: Spotswood, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Dr Sir
July. 25. 1799

Much rain last week and some other matters prevented my Sending to the post office until last Tuseday (the 23d) when I got both your favors of the 15 & 20 Inst., which I shall proceed to Answer, begining first with your private concerns.
The administrators of James Mercer decd are Mr John Brooke, and James Garnet—the former lives 13 Miles from me, the latter, 36—and you may rest assured I will take the Earliest opportunity of procureing the Conveyance you wish for.
The information you want as to the laws of Kentucky, respecting the recording of Deeds there made in Other states; I can only give as I had it myself when last in that State.
A Deed made here and witnessed and a certificate on the Back Signed by two Magistrates, certifying, the Said deed was Executed, Acknowledged, and witnessed in there presence, will be proof (Sufficient) to Carry it to Recorded, if Offered within 18 Months.
A Deed made and recorded here, with the clerks certificate thereto, will be admitted to record in Kentucky.
Whether there be any time limitted by the laws of Kentucky for bringing forward Such last mentioned deeds, I am at a Loss to Say—but I am inclined to think Not; as the laws of every country Say that no time Shall Obliterate the Testimony of Record.
About the 20th of August a Mr Duval, a man much to be relied on, moves Forward to Kentucky with his Family, so that you have Nothing to do but to Inclose your deed in a letter to Peyton Short Esqr. near lexington, and forward the Same to me, & on its comeing to hand I will Acknowledge the rect thereof—with an assureance, that Mr Duval to whose care I shall commit it; and who Settles near lexington, shall deliver the Same to Mr Short in person.
I Feel myself much obliged for your Attention to my Son Georges wishes—and had I have known, that you had determined (on quitting the chair of goverment) Not to be the Medium through which applications for appointments in the navy should come; I should have declined Soliciting you into a delicate Situation.
It was not my wish to procure George a Commission, or a permanent Appointment immediatly, but only to get him Enrolled as

a Midshipman, to be called on at the end of 15 Months, should there then be a Call for Such officers—dureing this time he would be closely employed in the Studdy of Mathematicks and Geography—and being a youth of fine genious would by close Studey in 12 Months make himself clever in these two branches of education and with a Knowledge of the former—he would be able in Six weeks to Make himself acquainted with the theory of Navigation—and to perfect him as much as possible in the duties of a Seaman; I am About haveing a Vessel done up with plank Masted and Spar[r]ed, and shall employ an old Seaman to instruct him in the Art of Riging (every Saturday) which will enable him to go on Ship board with Some confidence—and he Knowing the theory of his duty well, a few cruises perhaps might qualify him for a Step higher.
There are two appointments of Midshipmen from this Neighborhood; but the persons are ignorant of the duty they are to enter on and may Remain Midshipmen, until the hair grew grey on there head and be then but very little wiser, than the day they went on board.
My wish when George goes forth, is that he may be of Service, and as he Takes pleasure in Obligeing me—if ever he gets an Appointment, I shall require him to Serve the first cruise as a foremast man—which will give him experience in his duty as a Seaman.
I shall take every opportunity of pointing out to you, Such persons as I think in my opinion fit for Regimental appointments in doing of which, I will not Abuse the confidence you place in me.
Yesterday a Mr William Hedgeman Thom, came to my house, and presented me the inclosed from general Steevens, who I believe you know as well as I do—and being a Stranger to Mr Thoms Merits, Refer you to the Generals letter for the same.
In justice to the Gentleman, I must relate what Passed between us.
he observed, that being under age, when the appointments to the present army was made, and Supposeing there would for a length of time be a call for officers—he thought it would be more prudent to wait until he did come of age, then to Settle his affairs and put them in Such train, that he might not have any thing to Attend to but his duty—(Should he get an appointment.)

I then asked him if he had thought of any Particular rank; he said he wished the appointment of Captain; I told him that I was well apprized that the rank of Captain was held in but too little Estimination—but that he might rely, that it was a very important command; and a man must be well known to Obtain it in the present Service.
He modestly observed, that young men was generally ambitious; he perhaps might be so—but trusted it was no fault, when it was for a good purpose—and as he intended to make a life bussiness of the profession he wished to enter on; he pledged his honor, that he would receive and Accept any Appointment that was offered him—and that his anxiety to get into the army was Such, that if his wishes could not be gratified; he would enter as a private and depend on his good behaviour for promotion—Mr Thom is a Sensible, genteel, likely young man, and appears to have been well brought up—and if men of his Age (21) is received as Captains; had I power I should not hesitate in giveing him the Appointment. My family are well and desire the best regards to you, Mrs Washington, Mr & Mrs Lewis as well as dr Sir Yr Mt Affte Obliged Hbe St

Alexr Spotswood

P.S. Just as I concluded this letter, I recd your favr of the 21 inst.—enclosing a letter from the Secretary of the Navy to My Son George; with a commission, as midshipman in the Navy and a prescribed oath for him to take; but unfortunately, I was not Sufficiently Correct in his Name to you; It being—Go. Washington Spotswood—I shall address a polite letter to the Secretary—and Make my Acknowledgements to the president—for this mark of Attention—which I attribute to you—and shall impress on Georges mind the great favor which is Shewn him—and how highly he is indebted to you for the Appointment—I shall Send in the Commission &c. by My frd Brigadr gl Wm Washington of South Carolina Who is to be at my house this Evening—on his way I presume to Philadelphia, of course via Mt Vernon.
& on the return of the papers I will communicate to George his great good fortune when he shall address a propper letter on the Occasion to Secretary of the Navy. as usual Dr Sir A.S.
should Mr Thom Succeed—his letter may be addressed to him at Fredricksburg—to the care of Capt. Thornton.


Title: To George Washington from William Vans Murray, 26 July 1799 [letter not found]
From: Murray, William Vans
To: Washington, George

Letter not found: from William Vans Murray, 26 July 1799. On 26 Oct. GW wrote Murray: “Within the space of a few days, I have been favoured with your letters of the 26th of July. . . .”


Title: From George Washington to John Fitzgerald, 27 July 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Fitzgerald, John

Dear Sir,
Mount Vernon 27th July 1799

Recollecting that you had some doubt, at the last General Meeting of the Potomack Company, concerning the validity of your Powers to represent the State of Virginia in its interest therein, I wish to know whether those doubts have been removed by the Treasurer now in Office.
The Stockholders are called upon, I perceive⟨,⟩ by a Printed (and I presume circular) letter in precise terms to attend the next Genl Meeting in George Town the 5th of next month, to consider, & decide on an important measure. Much is it to be regretted, that a work of such public utility and (if executed) of such

immense advantage to the Undertakers, should be forcd to go limpingly on as that has done; particularly to the injury of those individuals who (in affect⟨ingly) endeavo⟩red to promote the completion of it.
If you have not powers of sufficient validity to justify your voting on this occasion, I hope, to your successor they will be given before the meeting; and if they are sufficient let me pray you to attend, and in time, for it is really necessary as well for the reputation as interest of the Company that the business should be rescued from its present Sloth.
I shall make a point of it, to be at the Union Tavern in George Town on the day appointed and by 11 oclock unless prevented by sickness; and in that case shall appear by Proxy; and I shall feel much chagreen if the State of Virginia is unrepresented thereat. With great esteem and regard I am—Dear Sir Your Obedt & Affecte Servt

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to William Berkeley, 29 July 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Berkeley, William

Sir,
Mount Vernon 29th July 1799

On monday the fifth of August the annual, General Meeting of the Potomac ⟨Compy is⟩ to be held in George Town ⟨illegible⟩.
Recollecting that at ⟨illegible⟩ meeting ⟨illegible⟩ last year, Colo. Fitzgerald ⟨mutilated em⟩powered to represent the interests of this Commonwealth therein, had doubt of the validity of that as your late worthy Predecessor in office was then no more; I take the liberty, without expressing any opinion with respect to the propriety of this doubt, to make you acquainted with the fact. For I shall feel much regret if the ⟨State⟩ is unrepresented at a meeting which will have important matters to consider, and when it has become so essential to do ⟨some illegible⟩.
It is indeed to be lamented that an Undertaking of such immense advantage to ⟨the Commonwealth⟩ if completed—and of such profit ⟨to the Stockhol⟩ders, should go limpingly on, as ⟨it⟩

has done for some years back. Excuse this liberty & believe me to be—Sir Your ⟨illegible⟩

Go: Washington


Title: To George Washington from James McHenry, 29 July 1799
From: McHenry, James
To: Washington, George

Dear Sir.
Philad[elphia] 29 July 1799

Mr Bordley left the inclosed collection of his works with me with a request that I should forward it to you. There are some useful things in the book, but I believe little of it his own.
Francis has procured the Sword for our young warrior, and tells me, the helmit will soon be finished, when the whole will be forwarded.
It appears by a letter from Mr Murray to the Secy of State, that he had received the Secy’s letter advising the appointment of the 3 Commissioners and forwarded or was about to forward to Paris the conditions under which the appointment was made. Can any good possibly come out of this business? I fear not. Yours ever & Affly

James McHenry


Title: From George Washington to Peyton Short, 31 July 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Short, Peyton

Sir,
Mount Vernon 31st July 1799

I avail myself of your obliging offer (when last in Virginia to serve me in Kentucky) by requesting the favour of you to have

the Deed, herewith sent admitted to Record in the County of Kentucky, in which the land may now be, if a division of Jefferson has been made since the granting of the Patent, originally.
This Land was conveyed to me by Genl Lee, and is of Record in the Territory of the Commonwealth before Kentucky was acknowledged as a State; but I thot it best, on account of some little informalities, (which, however, would not have affected the title) to have the business take its present shape. wch makes it necessary to be of Record in the County & State in which the land is situated.
Not knowing with precision, what time is allowed by the Laws of Kentucky for proofs of this kind, the Deed may come to your hands out of Season. Should this happen, I would thank you to advise me in order that I may be certain of its having got to your hands, you would do me a favour in acknowledging the receipt ⟨of it⟩ under any circumstances.
The expence attending this business, be what it may, will, with thanks also, be most chearfully paid by Sir Your Most Obedt Very Humble Servant

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to Alexander Spotswood, 31 July 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Spotswood, Alexander

Dear Sir,
Mount Vernon 31st July 1799

I have been duly favoured in the receipt of your letter of the 25th instant; and thank you for the kind information given in it respecting the removal of Mr Duval to Kentucky; and your intention of embracing the earliest opportunity of enquiring after the Conveyance from the deceased James Mercer, Esqr. &ca to me.
Enclosed is the Deed from Genl Lee to me, for the Land he sold me; lying on Rough Creek in Kentucky; now sent for the purpose of transmission by Mr Duval to Peyton Short Esqr.—to whom, having received a very polite tender of his service in Kentucky, civility, (as he will be the medium through which the business is to be transacted) required I should write.

I leave my letter to him, covering the Deed, open for your perusal: requesting that, you would be so good as to inclose it in one from yourself to Mr Short; and in a particular manner recommending them to the care of Mr Duval. If eighteen months are allowed by the Laws of Kentucky for the admission of proof, there is yet sufficient time for Lee’s Deed to me to be recorded in that State. If otherwise, Mr Short, I persuade myself, will advise me thereof.
I think your determination to qualify your Son for the duties he will have to perform, is highly proper. It will give him confidence in himself—and advantages in the eyes of his Superior Officers—which cannot but be serviceable to his rise in the Navy.
Mr Thom’s name shall be entered on my list, and his pretensions duly considered & compared, when an arrangement of the whole is to be made.
Mrs Washington unites with me in every good wish for yourself Mrs Spotswood & family—and I am Dr Sir—Yr Obliged & Affecte

Go: Washington


Title: To George Washington from Timothy Pickering, 2 August 1799
From: Pickering, Timothy
To: Washington, George

(confidential)
Sir,Philadelphia August 2. 1799.
A letter from Mr Murray of May 17 received this week, covers a letter from Talleyrand, dated May 12th, assuring him that the Executive Directory will receive the Envoys of the U. States in their official character; and that they shall enjoy all the prerogatives attached to it by the law of nations; and that one or more ministers shall be duly authorized to treat with them.
These papers I have sent to the President. The day before, I had sent to him a letter from Mr King, informing that Russia, otherwise ready to enter into a commercial treaty with us, had suspended it, because we were about to treat with France.
Govr Davie of No. Carolina has been appointed, and consents to serve, in the room of the late Govr Henry, as one of the Envoys.
Mr Adams has agreed on the terms of a treaty with Prussia.
I believe I have before mentioned, that the mission of Mr Smith to Constantinople has been suspended: It will now be more than ever necessary previously to ascertain whether he would be received. Mr King will make the inquiry. I am with great respect Sir yr obt servt

Timothy Pickering


Title: To George Washington from Edward Rutledge, 3 August 1799 [letter not found]
From: Rutledge, Edward
To: Washington, George

 Letter not found: from Edward Rutledge, 3 Aug. 1799. On 9 Sept. GW wrote Rutledge that he had received “your obliging favour of the 3d of Augt.”


Title: From George Washington to Jeremiah Olney, 4 August 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Olney, Jeremiah

Dear Sir,
Mount Vernon 4th Augt 1799

Your favor of the 13th Ulto, accompanying the oration of Mr Maxcy, has been duly received, and for your politeness in sending me the latter, I pray you to accept my thanks.
The sentiments expressed by that Gentleman on Government, and tendency of such conduct as is opposed to the Public functionaries in our own, are too just not to carry conviction to every well disposed, and reflecting mind. With very great esteem—I remain Dear Sir Your Most Obedt Servt

Go: Washington


Title: To George Washington from Alexander Spotswood, 4 August 1799
From: Spotswood, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Dr Sir
Newpost August 4. 1799.

your favour of the 31 of July, Covering your letter to Mr Short, and Lees deed to you, has come to hand, and shall be duly Attended to.
I am about to Build a Yawl for the Convenience of my Family going by water to Fredericksburg; which mode of conveyance in the Summer is more pleasant than a Carraige; yours pleaseing me better than any I have yet Seen, will thank you to direct Mr Anderson, to send me on paper her dimensions as Follows
1. the whole length from the middle of her transom to the top of her Stern
2. Width across her transom,
3. Width across the middle of the boat, and depth
4—width across the foremast Seat.
Mrs Spotswood and family desire there best Regards to you Mrs Washington, & Mr & Mrs Lewis as well as dr sir yr aff. & Obt St

Alexr Spotswood


Title: To George Washington from James McHenry, 5 August 1799
From: McHenry, James
To: Washington, George

(Private)my Dear Sir.
Philad[elphia] 5 Augt 1799.

Mr Murray has executed his instructions and Mr Pickering has received from him the answer of Mr Talyrand ⟨so⟩ that Mr Elsworth &c.

will be received according to their functions, and respected agreeably to the law of nations, and one or several persons be duly appointed to treat with them.
So far the answer would seem a compliance with the conditions announced to the Senate by the President. The Secy insisted in his letter to Mr Murray, by order of the President, that they were to have an audience of the Directory, and this condition was also communicated to Talyrand. On this condition Talyrand is silent, of course it is reserved by the Directory to omit or grant it, as the one or the other may best suit their purpose.
In this point they have not complied with the conditions. But besides this reserve, there is an insult in Talyrands communication. He thinks it strange, that so much time should have been suffered to elapse, to repeat an inquiry which he had before answered to Mr Gerry and ⟨also⟩ to Mr Murray.
The whole has been sent to Quincy to take its fate there.
You will observe that a very great change has taken place in the affairs of Europe since the mission was thought of: That a treaty with France, cannot in point of trade and commerce, place us in so good a situation as that we are now in: That if we form a treaty with France we expose our trade to the more serious inconveniences from the other powers opposed to France: and finally, that a treaty gives us no hold upon France. With all this before us ought we to desire a treaty? I really find the dilemma extremely distressing. Yours ever & Affly

James McHenry


Title: To George Washington from George Steptoe Washington, 7 August 1799 [letter not found]
From: Washington, George Steptoe
To: Washington, George

Letter not found: from George Steptoe Washington, 7 Aug. 1799. On 14 Aug. Tobias Lear wrote George Steptoe Washington: “The General has received your letter of the 7th inst.” (DLC:GW).


Title: To George Washington from William Vans Murray, 9 August 1799 [letter not found]
From: Murray, William Vans
To: Washington, George

Letter not found: from William Vans Murray, 9 Aug. 1799. GW wrote Murray on 26 Oct. that he had just received a number of letters from him, including those dated the “9th and 17th of August.”


Title: To George Washington from William Baynham, 10 August 1799
From: Baynham, William
To: Washington, George

Sir
Essex 10th Augt 1799

I returned last evening from a visit to Gloucester, and found your servant, Tom, who had arrived on the day after I left home, waiting with your letter of the 30th July.
I have this morning operated on both Eyes, although, I must confess, with no very sanguine expectations of the boy’s deriving essential relief by the operations: but I have thereby given him the only chance, which the case admits of, of seeing better with one eye, and of preventing total blindness in the other. The result will be known in the course of a fortnight; at the expiration of which time he will, I expect, be in a condition to travel with safety, and will, in that case, set out on his return to Mount Vernon; of which I will most assuredly advise you by post. With great respect I have the honor to be Sir your mo. obedt Servt

Wm Baynham


Title: To George Washington from Francis Deakins, 10 August 1799
From: Deakins, Francis
To: Washington, George

George Town post Office Augt 10th [17]99

I have this minute Recd the inclosed Letter—I Cant advise any Change in the mode of the Rents that I think may answer better then the present—the plantation is rather worn to Confind them to Grain alone—while they have to pay in Tobo they may pick out manuerd Land enought for it—Shou’d you however wish any Change whatever please to mention it & it Shall be done—with great Respect

Francis Deakins


Title: To George Washington from Benjamin Fendall, 10 August 1799
From: Fendall, Benjamin
To: Washington, George

Dr Sir
Cedar-Hill [Charles County, Md.] Augt 10th [17]99

Within this Day, or two, I found myself, so much relieved, from my long continued, & painful illness, though I use my left arm, with some difficulty, as to be enabled, to finish Mrs Washingtons Teeth, and you’ll receive them, safe, I hope, by my Servant. They are—as nearly as I can now, recollect—like the old ones—As there are so many ways, to make, & shape Teeth—’twou’d be almost impossible, to make ’em, exactly alike—after some time, without having the old ones present. The Model I took, has, also, by accident, sustain’d some injury. I am extremely sorry, indeed, yr Lady has been obliged to wait so long—owing to my long absence from home and my Illness, after I had arriv’d at Cedar-Hill. I wish you, & Mrs Washington, to have every conviction within yourselves, I ever will, with promptitude, and with pleasure, serve you both when ever you may choose to Command me—if in my power, and I fondly flatter myself, youll both deem my excuse to be sufficiently admissible—at this Time. Please to present my most Respectful Compts to Mrs Washington, & believe me, Dr Sir Yrs, with due respect,

B: Fendall


Title: From George Washington to Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, 10 August 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Pinckney, Charles Cotesworth

My dear Sir,
Mount Vernon 10th Augt 1799

Daily expectation of Genl Washington’s arrival, must be received as my apology for not having given your obliging favour of the 25th of June, an earlier acknowledgment. He did not (on account of the indisposition of his Son, in North Carolina) reach this place until the 6th instant. He left us yesterday, with the young Gentleman; both in good health, and Spirits.
Permit me to offer you my best thanks for the Plumes you had the kindness to send me; which are, indeed, very handsome. Colo. Lear has, I presume, done the same in the enclosed letter; and the one for Captn Thornton (for the whole came hither in a general case) shall be sent to him by the first safe conveyance to Fredericksg his recruitg Station.
I thank you too, my good Sir, for the transcript of Major Mountflorence’s letter to you—which is an interesting one. But whether the knowledge the French Directory has of the President’s appointment of three Envoys, to treat—on certain previous stipulations—in France; & their reverse of fortunes, may not have given a different complexion to the business, remains to be decided. I wish this Nomination & appointment, may not be productive of embarrassmt in the measures of this Government.
Had the Gentleman, whose name is mentioned in Montflorences letter, been actually appointed as the Negociator of Peace, little doubt remains in my mind of his acceptance thereof; notwithstanding the admonitions which had been given him of the delicate situation in which he would be involved, in a visit to the United States at this crisis of our affairs, in any capacity whatsoever.
Lest Captain Thornton should not have been written to by you,

or seen your orders appointing him one of your aids—and have understood that you do not re⟨quire⟩ his attendance to the Southward, I will cause him to be advised ⟨illegible⟩.
Recruiting in so⟨me States⟩ has progressed tolerably well, ⟨illegible⟩ others it is at a stand; and indeed ⟨illegible⟩tion that can be ⟨thrown illegible⟩ by the enemies to our government ⟨illegible⟩—In a word, the Aurora, and ⟨illegible⟩ Gazettes which emanate from it, ⟨illegible⟩ which supports the same ⟨illegible⟩ are endeavouring by every ⟨means illegible⟩ and alarm, to create resistance to the Law, insubordination in ⟨the illegible⟩; In short, to prostrate discipline, and to introduce anarchy in the Military ⟨as they⟩ have attempted to do in the Civil government of this Country.
When—where—and how such things are to terminate, is beyond the reach of human Ken; but ⟨illegible⟩ they cannot progress much ⟨further with⟩out an explosion. Indeed ⟨illegible⟩ the Aurora (if one ⟨illegible⟩ publications) seems desirous ⟨illegible⟩ crisis. His inuendos, & charges ⟨illegible⟩ longer to be borne, ⟨illegible according⟩ to his account (and I have no doubt ⟨illegible⟩) there is a contest in Philadelphia for the honor of becoming his Bail. ⟨illegible am⟩ong other things, in language, & ⟨illegible⟩ impossible to be misunderstood, the ⟨Government⟩ is not only accused of being under ⟨British influence,⟩ but of bribery to a considerable amount. If the semblance of this on a fair & impartial investigation of the case shall appear, I will not only ac⟨knowledge⟩ myself to be among those who ⟨illegible⟩ in the Officers of it, but ⟨will pronounce⟩ him, not only a bold, but a ⟨illegible⟩ Printer; deserving of thanks, and high reward for bringing to light conduct so abominable. On the other hand, if it shall be found that it is all calumny—⟨calcula⟩ted to poison the minds of the People ⟨illegible⟩ disquietude, destroy all confidence ⟨in Public⟩ functionaries, prostrate the go⟨vernment &⟩ produce disunion of the States; ⟨illegible punishment⟩ ought to be inflicted on such ⟨illegible and⟩ Mr & Mrs Lewis are from home; ⟨the⟩ rest of the family unite in every good wish ⟨illegible⟩ Mrs Pinckney—whose indisposition ⟨illegible⟩ rest of the family; and I am ⟨illegible⟩ affece frd &ca

Go: Washington


Title: To George Washington from Jonathan Trumbull, Jr., 10 August 1799
From: Trumbull, Jonathan Jr.
To: Washington, George

My Dear Sir!
Lebanon [Conn.] 10th Augst 1799

The Delay which my last Letter experienced in reaching you, may be partly accounted for, by sending my Brothers Letter (which accompanied mine) under cover to Mr Wolcott in Phila. for his & Colo. Pickerings observation—what further delay it may have met with, I cannot tell; I only know, that in too many instances, there is not that punctual attention to Duty in our Post Offices, which the Public have a right to expect.
Your reply to Colo. Trumbull, on the project suggested by him, is very similar to what I had written him on the same subject: & is such, as must be given by every well informed, prudent & reflecting Mind, under present circumstances of our political situation. I feel myself much obliged to you Sir! for this communication of your sentiments.

As to the particular subject of my former Letter, I beg leave to observe, that my sentiments on the present State, & probable conduct of the two parties in the U. States, on the coming Event alluded to, are very coincident with yours; and I expect that the two sides will be perfectly Pitted on the occasion. The Idea which I took the liberty to hint to you, was not grounded in an Opinion of detatching thereby any single Antifederal Vote from their Man, whoever, or whatever he may be; but in the necessity of securing every Federal one on the other part; which is all that may be expected, under present circumstances, for any Gentleman who may be proposed. My Fears, & those of other well-wishers to our Country are, that, neither the present Gentleman in Office, nor any other who can be named, will be likely to secure with certainty, that decided & necessary totality of Votes, which are to be wished; unless it be the Gentleman I hinted to you before: and his Name, we flatter ourselves, would succeed without a single failure. Of the present locum tenens, I need say nothing to you—Your critical discernment of Characters, & general knowledge of public & private opinions, are such, as enable you to fix your own estimate, & form your own Judgment of future contingencies as respecting him. As to any others which might be named, I will not trouble you at present—I only beg leave to express my confidence, that your disposition to effect all the public Good you can, still remains; & will continue to exist, so long as Health, vigor & activity, shall be among the Blessings, which Heaven is pleased to indulge you with; & which I hope & trust, will, in Mercy to our Dear Country, be elongated beyond the Term of Three score Years & Ten.
I am not, my Dear Sir! among the Class of intimate & confidential Friends of the President, who might be entituled to whisper in his Ear, the Hint you suggest. I have been casting about in my mind, & making enquiries, for some one among his Massachusetts Friends, who might do this kind Office for him; but, altho many are wishing it, yet I cannot learn that any thing of the kind has yet been done to any good effect—nor do I learn that it is likely to be done, with any hopes of success. His own self-sufficiency, I fancy, will determine his Conduct on this, as on other subjects. Pardon my Dear Sir, the trouble I give you—& believe me to be—with high regard, & unceasing respect & Friendship—sir Your Obedient and very hume Servt

Jona. Trumbull


Title: From George Washington to Burwell Bassett, Jr., 11 August 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Bassett, Burwell Jr.

Dear Sir,
Mount Vernon ⟨11th Augt⟩ 1799

Sometime ⟨between illegible⟩ment to the walks of ⟨private illegible⟩ girl*, the body servant of Mrs Washington⟨,⟩ absconded without the least pr⟨ovocation⟩ and without our having ⟨illegible sus⟩picion of such, her intention ⟨illegible⟩ whither she had gone.
At length, we learnt ⟨illegible⟩ got to Portsmouth in New H⟨ampshire; in⟩ consequence of this information ⟨illegible⟩ authentic) I wrote to the Collect⟨or of the⟩ Port, Mr Whipple requesting ⟨illegible⟩ use proper means to restore ⟨her to her⟩ Mistress. At first, according to ⟨illegible⟩ she appeared willing to return: ⟨illegible⟩ the Vessel in which she was to ⟨illegible⟩ about to sail, she concealed ⟨illegible⟩ one difficulty and delay ⟨illegible⟩ther, so as to keep her Mistress ⟨from illegible⟩ Services until this time.
If, under this statement of ⟨illegible⟩ intention (as declared when here) of ⟨illegible⟩ Portsmouth, you could by any easy ⟨illegible⟩self & proper means, be the ⟨illegible⟩ of recovering, & forwarding the ⟨illegible⟩ place, it would be a pleasing circumstance to your Aunt.
I do not however wish you to undertake anything, that may involve ⟨illegible⟩ unpleasant, or troublesome ⟨illegible.⟩ The girl, as we have been ⟨illegible⟩ was enticed away by a Frenchman, ⟨illegible⟩ her, she was willing to come back; but ⟨illegible⟩ other connexions, wan⟨illegible⟩ conditions to her return, afterwards.
This I could not then, nor will ⟨I⟩ agree to; further than that, if she put⟨s me⟩ to no unnecessary trouble and expence; ⟨and⟩ conduct⟨s⟩ herself well for the time ⟨illegible⟩ she will escape punishment for the ⟨illegible⟩, & be treated according to her merit⟨s illegible⟩. To promise more, would be ⟨an im⟩politic & dangerous precedent. Your Aunt unites with me in ⟨best wishes⟩ for you; and I am—Dear Sir Your obedt & Affecte Servant

Go: Washington

*She went by the name of Oney Judge.


Title: From George Washington to Timothy Pickering, 11 August 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Pickering, Timothy

PrivateDear Sir,
Mount Vernon Augt 11th 1799

A day or two after my last letter to you was sent to the Post Office, I received your obliging favor of the 2d instant.
The embarrassments occasioned by the late appointment of Envoys, begin now to shew themselves; and must place the Government—whether it advances towards or retreats from the object, for which they were appointed, in a delicate situation. Of the two evils, the least, no doubt will be chosen. Neither, can be pleasant in its operation.
The advantage taken of a confidential trust, and Monopoly of Coffee by our Agent in St Domingo—is spoken of in severe terms by friends, as well as the enemies of our Government. With very great esteem & regard I am—Dear Sir Your Obedt Hble Servt

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to James McHenry, 12 August 1799
From: Washington, George
To: McHenry, James

Sir
Mount Vernon Augt 12th 1799

I have duly received your letter of the 7th inst., enclosing reccommendations in favor of Mr James Glenn for a Captaincy in the Provisional Army; and shall attend to your request to return this, and similar papers, whenever the list for Virginia shall be completed.

But, Sir, I must candidly acknowledge to you that I see no prospect of completing the selection of Officers from this State, for the Provisional Army, within any reasonable time, if at all, unless some other measure than that now pursued shd be adopted.
When, agreeably to your request, I assured you of my readiness to promote, so far as was in my power, the President’s wish to select officers for the 24 Regiments authorized to be raised, I very candidly stated to you the circumstances which had prevented my having such personal knowledge of Characters in this State as would enable me to make a selection here without the assistance of others; and, at the same time, submitted to your consideration, whether the President’s views might not be carried into effect with more facility & dispatch by having his determination to appoint Officers made known in such a manner as to give an opportunity to all who were desireous of serving to come forward with their pretensions; Or that proper Characters for the command of the Regiments should be appointed in the several Districts and power given to them, with the assistance of their Majors (who shd also be previously selected) to appoint the Company Officers of their respective Regiments. For the rejection of the first of these propositions you have given me your reasons. To the second I do not recollect that I have had any reply.
I must, however, endeavour to impress you with the necessity of adopting some other mode for Officering those Regiments, at least in this State, than that which has been pursued, if it is intended that the Officers shall be appointed before the meeting of Congress; for, with all my endeavours to obtain information respecting characters who are fit and willing to serve, I find that very few indeed have been brought forward, and these only from particular places. Immediately upon receiving your request to aid in this business, I wrote to several influential and confidential Characters, requesting them to furnish me with the names of such persons within their districts or the sphere of their acquaintance as were qualified and would be willing to accept appointments. From these sources I have obtaind but little information. Genl Marshall, Colo. Carrington and Colo. Heth on whom I placed great dependence for information have not furnished me with any except in two or three cases. From Genl Lee I have received only a single letter on the subject and that recommendg one person. Genl Morgan has been so good as to recommend a number of Characters;

but they are confined to a particular part of the State. Colo. Cropper, of the Eastern shore, has signified to me his willingness to accept the command of a Regiment, and has promised to furnish a list of names for other offices; but his selection will be limited to a few Counties, or at most to one District—I have also given eve[r]y encouragement in my power to others to come forward with recommendations or offers of service, but without effect. And, indeed, it can hardly be expected that persons would interest themselves in pointing out Characte[r]s for office unless there was a degree of certainty that they would be appointed. I shall, however, continue my endeavours to comply with your wishes in the way you desire; unless some other mode shd be adopted.
Enclosed is a letter from Captn George S. Washington with a recommendation of John Atwell, to be appointed a Cadet in his Company, vice [John] Stephens, who is promoted to a first lieutenancy. So far as I am acquainted with the Subscribers to this recommendation they are respectable Characters, and may be relied upon. With due consideration I have the honor to be


Title: From George Washington to Richard Kidder Meade, 12 August 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Meade, Richard Kidder

Dear Sir,
Mount Vernon 12th Augt 1799

I should have acknowledged the receipt of your favor of the 22d Ultimo before this, had I not been for sometime in daily expectation of seeing Genl Wm Washington, to whom I wished to communicate the contents of it. The General was here a few days since, when I put your recommendation of Captn Edmund Taylor for Brigade Inspector into his hands, and as he is gone on to Philadelphia, I presume that he will, while there, have the proper arrangements made on the subject.
Can you, my dear Sir, give me any assistance in selecting proper

characters from this State, to Officer four Regiments of Infantry which is the proportion allotted to Virginia of the 24 Regts authorized to be eventually raised? The Secy of War sometime since, requested ⟨me⟩ to furnish him with names of suitable characters for this purpose.
From a variety of circumstances my personal acquaintance with the ⟨inhabitants of this State has⟩ become very limited. To others then, on whom I can rely, I must look for information. But ⟨illegible⟩ had only a small proportion of the ⟨names illegible⟩ handed to me, and these confined principally to particular spots, when it is the Secretarys ⟨duty⟩ to have them dissiminated through the State. ⟨Whether⟩ this is owing to its not being generally known ⟨that⟩ he is ⟨illegible⟩ determined to take preparatory ⟨illegible⟩ to facilitate the raising of this Corps, or to ⟨illegible⟩ recommending characters for particular ⟨illegible⟩ with their own consent, when it is uncer⟨tain illegible⟩ appointed or not, I cannot say ⟨illegible un⟩able to select proper ⟨illegible⟩ for the command of the Regiments from ⟨illegible⟩ of the State, and through them to obtain the selection of the Company Officers, of their respective Regiments.
If any persons occur to you as being well qualified & willing to accept appointments in the eventual Army, you will much oblige me by handing their names, with such information respecting them as you may be able to obtain, & on which I shall place great reliance. Mrs Washington unites in respects, & best wishes to Mrs Meade & yourself with Dr Sir—Your Affecte & Obedt Servant

Go: Washington


Title: To George Washington from Thomas (later Robert Treat) Paine, 12 August 1799 [letter not found]
From: Paine, Thomas
To: Washington, George

Letter not found: from Thomas (later Robert Treat) Paine, 12 Aug. 1799. On 1 Sept. GW wrote Paine: “I have duly received your letter of the 12th of August.”


Title: To George Washington from William Smith, 12 August 1799
From: Smith, William
To: Washington, George

Honoured Sir
Camberwell [England] Augst 12th 1799.

It may be justly expected that I should make some Apology for giving you this Trouble. I am embolden’d to it, from your Character in the World, & from a persuasion that the recollection of an Old Friend, & fellow Soldier, may afford you some Pleasure. The reason of my Application will best be explained to you by the perusal of a Letter I received last March—a Copy of which I shall now transcribe.

Glasgow March 19th 1799
Sir

A Friend of mine from Virginia who as well as me, was well acquainted with the late Mr Robt Stobo, who on account of his appointment in the Virginia Regiment was entitled to certain Lands

in the back Country of that State, which are now become valuable & may still be recovered; & as I understand you are Son in Law to a Mrs Janet Richardson Sister to Mr Stobo who has a right to these Lands you may correspond with Mr James Lyle Mercht at Manchester on James River Virginia, in respect to them; and if you chuse to send Him a Letter of Attorney from your Mother in Law to transact the business, something considerable may be got, and you will be very safe in the Hands of that Gentleman & you may consult wt. Mr James Parker & Mr Samuel Donaldson both Merchts in London respecting the Character of that Gentleman & the writer of this Letter. I am Sir your most humble Servant

Alexr McCaul
To the Revd William Smith
Camberwell near London

In compliance with the Purport of this Letter we have sent out a full Power of Attorney, & the other Heirs with myself have bound ourselves to pay every Expense that may be incurred. From two of your Letters which I have had the privilege of reading, one I think in /71 to Capt. Stobo & the other in 1773 to my late Father in Law Mr David Richardson, I find there were certain Conditions to be fulfilled on the Part of the Grantee—This I fear has not been done—The Sudden Death of the one, & inability of the other may have prevented it—What we have to request of you Sir is, that if these Obstacles can be removed you would be so kind as lend us a helping hand. Nat[ura]l Justice seems to say, that an Original Grant made for honorable Services, should not be vacated from the non-performance of lesser Stipulations—In your last Letter to Mr Richardson you suggested that if Capt. Stobo’s Proportion of the Expenses Should not arrive some Expedient should be fallen upon to subject the Land to the Payment thereof. This I think both reasonable & just, as well as, that every other Person who may have been at any expense in fulfilling other Conditions should be fully re-imbursed—But after all it is to be hoped there will be a handsome overplus or remainder to my Mother in Law, & to us her natural heirs. Dear Sir I find myself again inclined to apologize for the trouble this may give you—yet I cannot persuade myself but that it must be a pleasing thought to you, if in any measure you can be useful to the Descendants & Relatives of one, who was

a Companion wt. you in many noble Exploits, & suffered more perhaps than any Man for the Sake of Virginia—Should you condescend to favor me with a few Lines you may direct as above—In the Hope that something will be done—I remain Hond Sir with every good Wish & the highest Esteem your obliged humble Servant

William Smith


Title: From George Washington to John Francis, 14 August 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Francis, John

Sir,
Mount Vernon 14th August 1799

It is reported, & generally believed, that the Houses I am building in the Federal City are engaged to you.
To your having the houses I have no objection, nor should I have any to the prevalence of the report, if a specific agreement had ever taken place. But as this is not the case, and until it happens may, & doubtless will be injurious to me, inasmuch as they may prevent applications from others, it has become necessary that this matter should be clearly understood.
It is not my intention, nor is it my wish, on the one hand, to ask an unreasonable rent; on the other hand, I am not disposed to be a loser by that building. I have made the best enquiries my opportunities have afforded, into the expectations of others with respect to Rents, & find none who are inclined to let their property in the Federal City or any where else indeed, for less than seven & an half prcent on the whole expenditure: to which they add the taxes thereon, & that of Insurance against Fire. Some, I am told, will not accept of this as an equivalent Rent, because it will give them little (if any more they say) than common interest for their money; when it is well known that the ware & Tare of houses require much more.
Upon the terms, however, herementioned (having no pecuniary inducement to build) you may become the occupant of my lots and the Improvements thereon in the Federal City; keeping them in repair as is customary; and it rests with you to say yea, or nay, to make it a bargain, or otherwise. The whole amount of the cost can,

& shall be shewn to the minutest fraction, to whomsoever is disposed to accede to these terms; because the prices of the lots are known, & every thing being new, ⟨illegible⟩ are ready, & can easily be shewn to any one.
You may reasonably, and justly suppose that the Lots are obtained upon the best terms, because building ⟨illegible⟩ the condition thereof; and because the materials were procured without credit, for I pay on demd for them, & the Workmens wages. All parts of the Work will, I persuade myself, from the character of the Undertaker, be well executed, and in a neat & handsome, but not costly style.
With this explanation & information, you will be enabled to give a definitive answer: which I shall shortly expect, that I may know whether to consider you as a Tenant or not. One of the Houses, by contract is to be finished in November next—the other in March following. I am Sir Yr very Hble Servt

Go: Washington


Title: From George Washington to Alexander Hamilton, 14 August 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Hamilton, Alexander

Sir,
Mount Vernon, August 14th 1799

Enclosed are sundry letters (as mentioned on the other side) which have come to my hands, recommending Captain Edmund Taylor and Captain William K. Blue for the Office of Brigade Inspector.
As this Officer is to be appointed by the Inspector General I forward these letters for your consideration; and add, that I have not a personal knowledge of the Gentlemen recommended which

can enable me to give any further information respecting their merits or pretensions. With very great regard I am, Sir, Your most obedt Servt

Go: Washington

List of Letters enclosed.
Letter from Colo. Richd K. Meade recommendg Captn Taylor
 Do from Colo. Thomas Parker recommendg ditto—
 Do from Colo. Leven Powell recommendg Captn Blue
 Do from Colo. Thomas Parker recommendg ditto
 Do from Colo. T. Blackburn recommendg ditto.


Title: To George Washington from James McHenry, 14 August 1799
From: McHenry, James
To: Washington, George

Dear Sir
War Department [Philadelphia] 14 Augt 1799

Governor Davie of N. Carolina sent me by the last mail, three copies of a little work of his intitled, “instructions to be observed for the formations and movements of Cavalry,” one of which he requested me, which I now do, to present to the commander in chief.
I do not recollect whether I mentioned to you, that he is one in the Commission to the Directory. The President has directed the mission to proceed. Whatever opinions may have been entertained respecting its original propriety, now, it having been adopted, I think, the honour and dignity of the government demand, that it should be pursued in a spirit of fairness and liberal good faith. I am my dear Sir most sincerely & Affly yours

James McHenry


Title: To George Washington from Zechariah Lewis, 15 August 1799 [letter not found]
From: Lewis, Zechariah
To: Washington, George

Letter not found: from Zechariah Lewis, 15 Aug. 1799. On 30 Aug. GW wrote Lewis that he had received his “favor of the 15th instant.”


Title: To George Washington from John Francis, 17 August 1799
From: Francis, John
To: Washington, George

Sir
Philadelphia August 17th 1799

I was favored this morning with your letter of the 14th instant, and hasten to reply to it in order that it may be speedily ascertained whether I am to have your two houses in the Federal City, and the terms. From what passed when I was at that place last year I counted upon them with so much certainty that I have not thought of applying elsewhere, and I am still as desirous to occupy them as I was then, provided I can have the prospect of doing it with satisfaction to you, and advantage to myself.
I entertain no doubt that the houses will be finished in a suitable manner, and that they will be sufficiently dry to live in by the first of August next, from which time I am willing the rent should begin to accrue. I cannot take possession sooner, nor will the business which I am in enable me to pay rent for houses there, and here at the same time. Should this correspond with your expectations and wishes, it will only remain for you to state the precise sum which I am to pay pr annum including insurance, taxes of all kinds, and in full of every other demand whatsoever. This you will be able to do I presume without difficulty from the bills and estimates in your possession; upon receipt of which I will immediately return you a definitive answer. In this way I shall know before hand what I promise and can assure you with the more confidence that I will perform my engagements. As I expect to incur considerable expenses in removing and establishing myself at a new place it is incumbent on me to proceed with caution, that I may not improvidently run the risk of losing the character of a punctual man, which I have hitherto maintained in all my dealings. I need not urge arguments to induce you to let me have the houses upon

reasonable terms. Your own sense of justice will I am sure fix the rent (as it ought to be) in an equitable, and proper manner. I have the honor to be, Sir With the greatest respect Your most Obt & humble servant

John Francis


Title: From George Washington to Robert Lewis, 17 August 1799
From: Washington, George
To: Lewis, Robert

Dear Sir,
Mount Vernon 17th Augt 1799

Your letter of the 7th instant came duly to hand, but being received with many other letters, it was laid by, and entirely forgotten, until I came across it yesterday again. Mr Ariss’s draught on Mr James Russell for £42 pounds shall be presented to him, but if he is indisposed to pay it, or wants time to do it, he has a good pretext for delay, as you have sent it without your Endorsement, although made payable to you.
Of the facts related in the enclosed letter, relative to the loss of his Crop, by the Hessian fly, I know nothing. If it should appear to you evident, that Kercheval has used his true endeavour to raise the means to discharge his Rent, & is deprived thereof by an Act of Providence, I am willing, however illy I can afford to do it, to make some reasonable abatement therefrom; of wch you, from enquiry, will be the best judge.
It is demonstratively clear, that on this Estate (Mount Vernon) I have more working Negros by a full moiety, than can be employed to any advantage in the farming System; and I shall never turn Planter thereon.
To sell the overplus I cannot, because I am principled against this kind of traffic in the human species. To hire them out, is almost as bad, because they could not be disposed of in families to any advantage, and to disperse the families I have an aversion. What then is to be done? Something must, or I shall be ruined; for all the money (in addition to what I raise by Crops, and rents) that have been received for Lands, sold within the last four years, to the amount of Fifty thousand dollars, has scarcely been able to keep me a float.
Under these circumstances, and a thorough conviction that half

the workers I keep on this Estate, would render me a greater nett profit than I now derive from the whole, has made me resolve, if it can be accomplished, to settle Plantations on some of my other Lands. But where? without going to the Western Country, I am unable, as yet to decide; as the best, if not all the Lands I have on the East of the Alliganies, are under Leases, or some kind of incumbrance or an other. But as you can give me correct information relative to this matter, I now early apply for it.
What then is the State of Kerchevals lot, & the other adjoining? are they under Leases? If not, is the Land good? and how many hands would it work to advantage? Have I any other good Land in Berkeley that could be obtained on reasonable terms? Is that small tract above the Warm Springs engaged for the ensuing year? How much cleared Land is there on it? and what kind of buildings? How many hands could be usefully employed thereon? Information on these points, and any others relative thereto, would be acceptable to me.
The drought has been so excessive on this Estate, that I have made no Oats—& if it continues a few days longer, shall make no Corn. I have cut little or no Grass; and my Meadows, at this time, are as bare as the pavements; of consequence no second Crop can be expected. These things will compel me, I expect, to reduce the Mouths that feed on the Hay. I have two or three young Jacks (besides young Royal Gift) and several She Asses, that I would dispose of. Would Fauquier, or where else, be a good place to dispose of them?
I am glad to hear that your bro: Lawrence is so much amended, as your letter indicates, whether it be from Sulpher application, or other causes: but if Doctr Baynham, under whose hands he was, was unable to effect a radical cure, I should not place much confidence in Voss’s Springs, as the disorder must be deep rooted.
Your Aunt unites with me in best wishes for Mrs Lewis, yourself & family, and I am—Dear Sir, Your Sincere friend and Affectionate Uncle

Go: Washington

P.S. Since writing the foregoing, Mr Anderson informs me that he saw you in Alexandria yesterday; and that you told him you were to be in Winchester on Monday, or Tuesday next: being desirous that this letter should get to your hands as early as possible—and

especially while you were over the Ridge, I have put it under cover to Mr Bush of Winchester, with a request that if you should not be there to send it by Post to Fauquier Court House.


Title: To George Washington from William Vans Murray, 17 August 1799
From: Vans Murray, William
To: Washington, George

Dear Sir,
17 August 1799

Yesterday I went to 1268. 1175. 1582. to meet Mr 913. 753⟨.⟩ I had before met him at a more distant place. Knowing from ⟨his⟩ letters to me, that he intended to go to the United States, a measure ⟨which⟩ I opposed by every argument I could think of—I since that enjoyed ⟨the⟩ pleasure of your letter to him of December

last, & on his lately w⟨riting⟩ to me for passports, informing me of his intentions of going, I w⟨ent⟩ yesterday to meet him & to urge the reasons which I had scattered in my several letters to dissuade him. Though I have no rights over his friendly letters, yet I may with good faith inclose to you Sir, a press copy of my last to him, before my ride yesterday I found him still much bent upon going—Leaving his lady & daughter in France & his plan, if he go, is to settle for life. To buy a farm near Mount Vernon—To land in the Chesepeak & hasten to present himself to his paternal house, as he says & pass the winter, that he is sure that he can convince you that he could have no azylum elsewhere from the present & probable future State of Europe, for though war is not yet declared by or against Sweden & Denmark & though the States of Germany are not all in the war, he expects that the first will be in war & in the last he cannot live & this Country is threatened with invasion.
He seems to have no idea of being in the party which will Soon be the triumphant party, because their principles are not his & he avows those which he acted on in 1791. It was in vain to urge on this head the apology afforded by that tremendous NECESSITY which in those moments crushes men of all sorts together for the public good & for the great end of indeed pursuing the Independance of all other nations! He cannot join if they would let home the parties that overturned the constitutional Monarchy of 1791. Thus he is left by the storm he helped to raise, high & dry on a shore to which no ebbs & flows can reach him, to launch him again for any quiet port.
I have urged every thing to Indispose him for the voyage to U.S. He avows that he will be a federalist & Support the Govt U.S. I tell him that will be little in his power & that title will be decisive against his affairs & family in France, if she exist as a Republic (which I do not expect[)]—He answered, I care not for my affairs, I will pursue my principles, and I would be against democratizing the American Govt—I am against what France has done towards the United States. In fact he attempted to remove my arguments continually—He repeated a question which he before made at our other interview—Could I not said he be useful in uniting parties? I told him no! but this little trait will shew you Sir, that he perpetually thinks ⟨&⟩ feels in the sense of a public character, notwithstanding all that has past—The steady adherance to those

Theories which have deluged Europe with affliction, excited more of melancholy than ⟨of⟩ Admiration. Though he is I think less cheerful a little than when I saw him in March, he is fat & hearty, unbroken in mind & body, full of pleasant & interesting conversation & a most agreeable & one who will have influence go where he will, except among those who reflect & have experience enough to seperate the pleasing from the proper—I left him apparently undecided whether he will go or not—but I think rather that he will go⟨.⟩ The passport he asked for was for Emden, Hamburgh & Ame⟨rica.⟩ I had sent him a letter, the one of which a copy is inclosed which I promised him one—Though a very interesting man yet I wish him to stay here where he is quiet untill things are more tranquil among us. Long since cured of visionary speculations, I hope myself—I dread their union in a popular character in the United States—In a possible state of things in Europe—were it practicable for parties in France—to themselves restore Monarchy—it might perhaps be useful⟨.⟩ All the attractions belonging to that inducement to re⟨main⟩ in Europe, I urged as far as they occurred—Once before I had very much relyd on that line of persuasion—& then it s⟨eemed⟩ to impress him—but now he Seemed to have no idea of the probability of that project—Indeed Suwarrows late proclamation announces what is perhaps the only practicable scheme—the Restoration of L. 18—& if it be accomplished, I rather believe that the chants of Philosophy will have little to do in the business & that the respective theories which have buried under bloody ruins will be in France what the Ludicrous, but bloody extravagances of puritanism, were in England after the Restoration of Charles 2d—a theme of Ridicule & dramatic exhibition!
I thought dear, Sir, that I ought to inform you upon a subject that has brought your pen into action & to shew you that I wished not only to do good but that I take a pride in pursuing what I believe to be accordant with your paternal views & vigilance towards our native land—even in cases where your personal friendship tended to another biass—I am with perfect & affecte respect & attachment Dear Sir yo. mo. obdt Sert &c. &c. &c.


Title: To George Washington from Auguste de Grasse, 20 August 1799 [letter not found]
From: Grasse, Alexandre-François-Auguste de Grasse-Rouville, comte de (marquis de Tilly)
To: Washington, George

Letter not found: from Auguste de Grasse, 20 Aug. 1799. On 9 Sept. GW wrote de Grasse: “I have received your letter of the 20th of August.”


Title: To George Washington from Alexander Hamilton, 21 August 1799
From: Hamilton, Alexander
To: Washington, George

Sir
New York August 21st 1799

I was yesterday honored with your letter of the 14th instant.
The recommendations of Captains Taylor and Blue will not fail to be considered when the situation of things is mature for the appointment of Brigade Inspectors.
Inclosed you will find a General Abstract of the recruiting returns, which at its date were received at the Office of the Adjutant General. Other Information induces me to estimate that the number now actually inlisted for Eleven of the Twelve additional Regiments exceeds Two thousand. The other is not yet in activity.
I ought to have informed you before this that General Wilkinson had arrived at this place. I have delivered to him heads of inquiry and conference, which embrace all the material points of consideration in our Western Affairs. He is busily engaged in reporting upon them; written rather than verbal Communications being by him preferred. The result of our Consultations will be transmitted to you for any direction which you may think fit to give. With the truest respect & attachment I have the honor to be Sir Yr Obedt Servant

Alex. Hamilton