piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
opened by  (2024-01-31 15:39:11+00:00): Hier soll die Route nicht verlaufen, sondern südlicher über den Feldhoek. Der Weg zum Feldhoek verläuft über den kleinen Patt zwischen den Häusern.
closed by RandomMapGuy (2026-06-20 09:55:09+00:00): Dieser Hinweis ergibt für mich keinen Sinn.
opened by Einhornguetner (2024-01-31 15:39:26+00:00): crossing is here

via StreetComplete 56.0

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/194895.jpg
https://westnordost.de/p/194896.jpg
closed by chris66 (2024-04-02 18:36:56+00:00): behoben
opened by  (2024-01-31 15:39:47+00:00): onosm.org submitted note from a business:
Name: شایان خوئینی ها
addr:street=قزوین بلوار شمالی نرسیده به چهارراه محمد رسولله
addr:city=قزوین
addr:postcode=4315756573
Phone number: 09102080473
Social Network: instagram: Moobile.shayan
Opening Hours: Morning: 10am to 2pm5pm to10pm
Category: Mobile Phone Shops
Accepted payment methods:
opened by Oskarst_ (2024-01-31 15:40:15+00:00): A lot of activity in Strava Heatmap due to the Mt. Difficultry Marathon, partly visible trail in the aerial imagery. Local knowledge is preferred to decide if this should be mapped or not.
opened by Oskarst_ (2024-01-31 15:40:18+00:00): A lot of activity in Strava Heatmap due to the Mt. Difficultry Marathon, partly visible trail in the aerial imagery. Local knowledge is preferred to decide if this should be mapped or not.
opened by Shoorick (2024-01-31 15:42:31+00:00): щебень, возле дома бетон

#OsmAnd
closed by Shoorick (2024-01-31 18:13:09+00:00): покрытие исправлено
opened by Shoorick (2024-01-31 15:42:33+00:00): бетонные ступеньки шириной метр без перил 

#OsmAnd
closed by Shoorick (2024-01-31 18:13:09+00:00): добавлены
opened by Shoorick (2024-01-31 15:42:34+00:00): отсюда и вниз ступеньки из кирпича или шлакоблока шириной 50 см

#OsmAnd
closed by Shoorick (2024-01-31 18:13:08+00:00): добавлены
opened by Shoorick (2024-01-31 15:43:06+00:00): Батумгора 10а - синее стеклянное здание, 6 этажей от верхнего въезда, площадка вокруг здания не огорожена

#EveryDoor
closed by Shoorick (2024-01-31 18:13:08+00:00): исправлено
opened by  (2024-01-31 15:43:45+00:00): Restaurant 1
closed by CurlingMan13 (2024-01-31 20:06:06+00:00): No context for note.
opened by  (2024-01-31 15:44:24+00:00): Ebrahimi
opened by Thierry1030 (2024-01-31 15:44:51+00:00): bike stands capacity=6
closed by Thierry1030 (2024-01-31 17:32:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1244997916
opened by JLZIMMERMANN (2024-01-31 15:45:07+00:00): bâti manquant
closed by GeorgeKaplan (2025-01-14 18:30:30+00:00): Vous avez fait la modif
opened by laser-jet (2024-01-31 15:45:18+00:00): Das ist eine doppelgarage, kein Haus. Hausnummer entfernen

via StreetComplete 56.0
closed by intschutschuna (2024-03-31 20:46:18+00:00): Auch eine Garage kann eine Hausnummer haben. Der Eintrag ist in diesem Fall korrekt, siehe offizielle Daten der Stadt Ostfildern:
https://www.ostfildern.de/OGIS-p-3109.html
building=garages ist bereits eingetragen
opened by JLZIMMERMANN (2024-01-31 15:45:18+00:00): bâti manquant
closed by GeorgeKaplan (2025-01-14 18:29:59+00:00): Vous avez fait la modif
opened by  (2024-01-31 15:46:56+00:00): Faisceau V de Pantin
commented by Britzz (2024-08-22 20:55:37+00:00): pour les non ferrovipathes c'est énigmatique ;-)
closed by Britzz (2025-01-18 13:21:39+00:00): note fermée telle quelle
opened by  (2024-01-31 15:47:48+00:00): No momento, há uma árvore caída bloqueando o caminho. Recomenda-se levar um facão.
closed by fititnt (2024-03-04 21:26:21+00:00): Obrigado pela sugestão.

Não obstante, esse tipo de informação temporária não é pratico de adicionar na OpenStreetMap.

Vou fechar sem ação.
opened by qugeb (2024-01-31 15:48:08+00:00): Wege bei den FAUBoxen

via StreetComplete_ee 56.0

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/194897.jpg

GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/qugeb/traces/11277514
opened by  (2024-01-31 15:49:45+00:00): Motel Las Burgas
closed by felipeeugenio (2024-02-01 12:03:42+00:00): agregado
opened by Sforzando9500 (2024-01-31 15:50:20+00:00): Dec wood

via StreetComplete 56.0
opened by Einhornguetner (2024-01-31 15:50:52+00:00): trampelpfad

via StreetComplete 56.0

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/194898.jpg

GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Einhornguetner/traces/11277521
opened by Supaplex (2024-01-31 15:51:16+00:00): https://www.tbri.gov.tw/
農業部生物多樣性研究所
opened by Einhornguetner (2024-01-31 15:51:44+00:00): not connected to each other

via StreetComplete 56.0

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/194899.jpg
opened by Redideo Studio (2024-01-31 15:55:28+00:00): Redideo Studio is a digital marketing creative agency in San Diego, CA. https://redideostudio.com/
commented by CurlingMan13 (2024-02-01 00:59:15+00:00): What is the address, website, phone, etc. for this business?
closed by cuzi (2025-02-02 19:31:44+00:00): Added. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4610883)
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 15:55:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4685880112

Is bicycle_parking=anchors really correct here? In case that it is a correct tagging - can you make photo and upload it to Wikimedia Commons or make it available on open license in other way?

I want to add it to OSM Wiki documentation and so far I was unable to find even single actually correct bicycle_parking=anchors

Is it maybe some other bicycle parking type? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle%20parking
opened by laser-jet (2024-01-31 15:55:45+00:00): Private Einfahrt, keine Straße

via StreetComplete 56.0

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/194900.jpg
closed by wermak (2024-02-03 02:58:31+00:00): Korrigiert.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 15:55:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11277549888

Is bicycle_parking=anchors really correct here? In case that it is a correct tagging - can you make photo and upload it to Wikimedia Commons or make it available on open license in other way?

I want to add it to OSM Wiki documentation and so far I was unable to find even single actually correct bicycle_parking=anchors

Is it maybe some other bicycle parking type? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle%20parking
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 15:55:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/602896536

Is bicycle_parking=anchors really correct here? In case that it is a correct tagging - can you make photo and upload it to Wikimedia Commons or make it available on open license in other way?

I want to add it to OSM Wiki documentation and so far I was unable to find even single actually correct bicycle_parking=anchors

Is it maybe some other bicycle parking type? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle%20parking
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 15:55:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9456881853

Is bicycle_parking=anchors really correct here? In case that it is a correct tagging - can you make photo and upload it to Wikimedia Commons or make it available on open license in other way?

I want to add it to OSM Wiki documentation and so far I was unable to find even single actually correct bicycle_parking=anchors

Is it maybe some other bicycle parking type? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle%20parking
commented by Black_Diamond (2024-01-31 16:52:55+00:00): I see that the value is also available in the iD editor, and you may want to consult that editor for more information. Based on what I've seen elsewhere, it also most likely resembles the main picture here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle_parking=wall_loops

Though the picture in the wiki shows that the anchor is not attached to a wall, which may be why it was labeled as an anchor instead of a "wall" loop. The "wall" part of the name may be confusing to some people. It could also be interpreted as a generic anchor that is likely a type of wheelbender where only 1 wheel can be attached.
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 05:10:43+00:00): > I see that the value is also available in the iD editor, and you may want to consult that editor for more information

note that it is coming from top used values on taginfo and it is not reviewed or intentionally added

> Based on what I've seen elsewhere, it also most likely resembles the main picture here: 

then it mismatches description on wiki of bicycle_parking=anchors ("A mere anchor hammered into a wall, the ground, or boulders. Low security.") and is again case of this tag being used where no such object exists.
commented by Black_Diamond (2024-02-01 08:10:57+00:00): Yeah, you're likely right. After reviewing the links in the Wiki for anchors, I've never seen anchors like that before around here. I typically see the wall loop style from the Wiki but rarely on a wall.

There does seem to be a lot of confusion on what each type really means. Perhaps it would be a good idea to propose deprecating these 2 values and find clearer names.
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 11:12:13+00:00): For anchors I am on quest for removing them by basically opening notes like that :)

So far about 40-80 were checked - and every single one turned to be mistagged.

Which second one you would deprecate?
commented by Black_Diamond (2024-02-01 17:27:48+00:00): I'd say wall_loops because being attached to the wall is not a condition for it being wall_loops. The name may be confused with bikes hanging vertically on the wall, like the kind seen on light rail.

If you see https://bicycleparking.org/resources/bicycle-parking-types, you will see them called front tire only. It also lists the grid style rack, which I also frequently see, but it's not listed on the OSM Wiki.
closed by Black_Diamond (2024-02-17 07:02:31+00:00): I've updated the parking here. It's a very unique configuration that I haven't seen before. It's also not very public. It's obviously for employee parking.

It's an unusual area for bicycle parking. One end of each parking space is like half of the Arcadia style, and the other end for the bike is just an above ground slot (metal slots to keep the bike upright). There's 2 spaces.

If that's not right, then I'd recommend just switching it to bicycle_parking=yes.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 15:55:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2394283449

Is bicycle_parking=anchors really correct here? In case that it is a correct tagging - can you make photo and upload it to Wikimedia Commons or make it available on open license in other way?

I want to add it to OSM Wiki documentation and so far I was unable to find even single actually correct bicycle_parking=anchors

Is it maybe some other bicycle parking type? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle%20parking
commented by leftybender (2024-02-07 18:18:14+00:00): Photo. https://www.flickr.com/photos/60302334@N03/53515283313/in/dateposted-public/lightbox/
commented by leftybender (2024-02-07 18:19:11+00:00): To me it is just bicycle_parking=rack. I would not make a separate row in the Wiki documentation for this thing.
commented by leftybender (2024-02-07 18:24:50+00:00): I went ahead and made the edits that I think make sense. If you _do_ want to improve the Wiki documentation, I have a suggestion:  you could remove all the editorializing. Just have the comment section explain the criteria that make a wall_loop a wall_loop, for example. It is not appropriate for it to preach about the frequency of bent wheels or the level of security. None of that is relevent.
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-17 12:02:24+00:00): > None of that is relevent.

I feel that it gives info why collecting this kind of data can be useful
closed by leftybender (2024-03-01 18:17:36+00:00): I updated the bike parking so I'm going to go ahead and close this note. Also I found an example of anchors bicycle parking and will upload a photo to wikimedia then to osm's wiki when I get around to it.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 15:56:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3677935919

Is bicycle_parking=anchors really correct here? In case that it is a correct tagging - can you make photo and upload it to Wikimedia Commons or make it available on open license in other way?

I want to add it to OSM Wiki documentation and so far I was unable to find even single actually correct bicycle_parking=anchors

Is it maybe some other bicycle parking type? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle%20parking
closed by tguen (2024-02-06 02:03:41+00:00): They're just regular "staple" stands. I've retagged them.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 15:56:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2392129085

Is bicycle_parking=anchors really correct here? In case that it is a correct tagging - can you make photo and upload it to Wikimedia Commons or make it available on open license in other way?

I want to add it to OSM Wiki documentation and so far I was unable to find even single actually correct bicycle_parking=anchors

Is it maybe some other bicycle parking type? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle%20parking
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 15:56:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7182110599

Is bicycle_parking=anchors really correct here? In case that it is a correct tagging - can you make photo and upload it to Wikimedia Commons or make it available on open license in other way?

I want to add it to OSM Wiki documentation and so far I was unable to find even single actually correct bicycle_parking=anchors

Is it maybe some other bicycle parking type? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle%20parking
closed by dannmer (2025-02-02 12:21:16+00:00): updated
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 15:56:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5037297461

Is bicycle_parking=anchors really correct here? In case that it is a correct tagging - can you make photo and upload it to Wikimedia Commons or make it available on open license in other way?

I want to add it to OSM Wiki documentation and so far I was unable to find even single actually correct bicycle_parking=anchors

Is it maybe some other bicycle parking type? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle%20parking
closed by MountainAddict (2024-06-16 18:39:41+00:00): Yes, they are actual anchors and there are 4 spots. I tagged them correctly 7 years ago 
Thanks
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 15:56:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9251531236

Is bicycle_parking=anchors really correct here? In case that it is a correct tagging - can you make photo and upload it to Wikimedia Commons or make it available on open license in other way?

I want to add it to OSM Wiki documentation and so far I was unable to find even single actually correct bicycle_parking=anchors

Is it maybe some other bicycle parking type? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle%20parking
closed by dannmer (2025-02-17 11:44:05+00:00): updated
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 15:56:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5796769317

Is bicycle_parking=anchors really correct here? In case that it is a correct tagging - can you make photo and upload it to Wikimedia Commons or make it available on open license in other way?

I want to add it to OSM Wiki documentation and so far I was unable to find even single actually correct bicycle_parking=anchors

Is it maybe some other bicycle parking type? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle%20parking
closed by Zandu (2024-03-02 03:57:46+00:00): You’re right. That was incorrect. Not even sure where I got that. Thanks for the note.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 15:56:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11532791850

Is bicycle_parking=anchors really correct here? In case that it is a correct tagging - can you make photo and upload it to Wikimedia Commons or make it available on open license in other way?

I want to add it to OSM Wiki documentation and so far I was unable to find even single actually correct bicycle_parking=anchors

Is it maybe some other bicycle parking type? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle%20parking
closed by bdentremont (2024-01-31 23:23:10+00:00): I occasionally drive past this place and was going to check it out.  However, I found a news article that shows the bike rack which would be better characterized as wave.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146924897
opened by Geovelo_Notes (2024-01-31 15:56:58+00:00): Une voie cyclable à circulation opposé et présenté mais pas indiqué, pour pratiquer l'avenue du Taillan au-dessus de la rocade , jusqu'à retrouver la piste dans le sens normal après le pont. (This note has been created from Geovelo : http://amenagements-cyclables.fr/fr/contributions/60445)
commented by Geovelo_Notes (2024-01-31 16:28:37+00:00): Un commentaire a été ajouté par un cycliste geovelo : "Bonjour,

Pouvez-vous nous apporter des détails sur l'aménagement s'il vous plaît ? (début, fin, rue croisée, type de pistes, paneaux, type de parking, etc)
N’hésitez pas à ajouter des photos via de nouvelles contributions ou à support@geovelo.fr. 
Cela nous aidera à faire une mise à jour qualitative des informations sur OpenStreetMap.
Cyclablement,"
commented by Geovelo_Notes (2024-09-30 10:11:15+00:00): Un commentaire a été ajouté par un cycliste Geovelo : "Bonjour, je clos cette contribution en l'absence de réponses."
opened by Marival (2024-01-31 15:59:03+00:00): Passage pieton ici, face no 20

via StreetComplete 56.0
closed by Marival (2024-02-03 12:13:02+00:00): Fait
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 16:00:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79085824

name=Spielplatz ? Is it an actual name of this place? Or it is name of feature type present here and should be removed? Is it obvious enough to just remotely mass-remove all name=Spielplatz from leisure=playground objects?
commented by Vinzenz Mai (2024-02-03 09:27:23+00:00): This name was removed and re-added several times in the last year. I think it would be best to add a source for this descriptive name if there is one. Maybe @goodidea could do this.
closed by user_19737901 (2024-02-04 08:03:51+00:00): Name removed
commented by nw520 (2024-02-08 17:36:41+00:00): Hallo PeaceForever☮️, Vinzenz Mai hatte bereits erwähnt, dass das am besten mit der beitragenden Person abzusprechen ist, die den name-Tag gesetzt hat. Insofern finde ich es etwas unschön, dass du hier eingegriffen hast, obwohl du augenscheinlich keinen Ortsbezug zur Region hast.
commented by Vinzenz Mai (2024-02-12 15:50:31+00:00): Signage of this playground (Beschilderung dieses Spielplatzes, in gleicher Form auch auf anderen Spielplätzen zu finden) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Spielplatz-wilhelm-heinrich-bruecke.jpg
closed by goodidea (2024-02-14 23:16:42+00:00): It is an actual name of this place. See comments in other note. It is not obvious enough for a mass edit. Questions answered?

Source was already added, see source:name.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 16:01:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124489099

name=Spielplatz ? Is it an actual name of this place? Or it is name of feature type present here and should be removed? Is it obvious enough to just remotely mass-remove all name=Spielplatz from leisure=playground objects?
commented by goodidea (2024-02-06 21:43:20+00:00): There is a sign with this name, see source:name. Therefore, it is NOT an arbitrary descriptive term.  I don't understand why this is a problem, a name CAN sometimes be descriptive and not all names are unique.  I cannot understand the dogmatism surrounding the name issue and I clearly reject mass-edit.  I find that quite presumptuous... I also don't see a note like this as helpful, the individual case here is pretty clear.  That's why I'm closing it again now.
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-07 06:43:52+00:00): sign with description standing there does not mean it is name

for example sign "Toilet, 2 euro fee" does not mean that toilet is named "Toilet, 2 euro fee" and should get name=Toilet, 2 euro fee tag

Similarly viewpoint with descriptive sign is not necessarily named

See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/is-name-toilet-even-theorethically-valid-for-amenity-toilets/105540 thread
closed by goodidea (2024-02-07 21:33:09+00:00): I disagree. It is not the same.

This sign gives this small piece of land a name (the sign is an official sign of the town!) and separates it from (nature) areas next to it. Ad it is a valid and unique name in the geographic context of a playground (= normally a neighborhood), because there is no other „Spielplatz“.


Names are not UIDs in my opinion, and trying to define it very strictly in that direction is going in the wrong direction in my opinion. My very serious question about what the problem is was not answered.

And another reason: there are also playgrounds here (tagged as playground) that have a similar sign with the title “Spielwiese” (= just a grassy area) – so the name also has a reason and differentiates between different types of playgrounds.

And another question: how else should the title on the sign be tagged if NOT as a name? Something as name:signed=playground? (It wouldn't be okay if it was denied that it is a name). So you should invent a new tag (“Any tag you like”), e.g. "name_on_sign_not_fulfilling_too_strict_name_requirements=Spielplatz"? That's crazy ...

For me, a good comparison is a kiosk with the name „Kiosk“ or a small fast food truck with the name „Imbiss“ (= snack) – the owner decided to use this (descriptive) name, maybe because he didn't think it was important enough to give the small business a fancy name, but it is still the externally visible and used name of it.

That's really not the same like a sign "Toilet, 2 euro fee".

It's clear to me that there is a gray area when it comes to names where you can't say 100% clearly what a proper name is if a descriptive term has been used. And one should not try to eliminate this gray area through overly strict definitions that have something dogmatic about them.

And I simply don't see any problem with tagging a descriptive name as a name, as long as you haven't invented this descriptive name yourself, but there is clear evidence on site that a name was given for something.
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-08 18:27:10+00:00): > And another question: how else should the title on the sign be tagged if NOT as a name?

we have https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:inscription

> And I simply don't see any problem with tagging a descriptive name as a name, as long as you haven't invented this descriptive name yourself, but there is clear evidence on site that a name was given for something.

So if oak would have sign "Oak" (for example in botanical garden) then you would put name=Oak?
commented by Vinzenz Mai (2024-02-12 15:58:56+00:00): I think there is often a grey area at such objects within which the decisions of others should be respected. 
The sign could be the same one as at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4094704 so please have a look at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Spielplatz-wilhelm-heinrich-bruecke.jpg (uploaded only for these notes :), it was really hard work with wrong language for the description too).