piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 10:41:46+00:00): Otworzyłeś całą serię uwag co do rozbieżności między tą mapą a OSM

A poza nielicznymi wyjątkami nie wolno nam kopiować z innych map
closed by Adrian Tync (2021-07-22 18:23:31+00:00): Jakie rozbieżności?! Przecież po prostu na OSM te akweny nie mają nazwy…
commented by Adrian Tync (2021-07-22 18:25:20+00:00): akurat w tym przypadku w jednych źródłach jest Galman, w innych Galmon
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 18:29:07+00:00): "Jakie rozbieżności?! Przecież po prostu na OSM te akweny nie mają nazwy… "

no właśnie na tym polega rozbieżność: OSM nie ma nazwy, inna mapa (której nie wolno nam kopiować) ma nazwę
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:20:02+00:00): CENTRO DE SALUD LA CALA DE MIJAS
+34951267360
closed by sanchi (2021-08-02 21:07:30+00:00): añadido
opened by scai (2021-07-22 08:21:47+00:00): Wie ist hier die Oberfläche? Derzeit ist surface="sett; asphalt" gesetzt, das sieht kaputt aus.
commented by scai (2021-07-22 09:43:44+00:00): Ich sehe schon, laut Mapillary gibt es hier am Rand teils Asphalt und in der Mitte sett. Für Radfahrer wäre es sicherlich nützlich zu wissen, dass sie größtenteils auf Asphalt fahren können. Deswegen cycleway:surface=asphalt zu setzen scheint mir aber nicht korrekt, da hier kein beschildeter Radweg existiert. Gibt es andere Möglichkeiten?
closed by scai (2021-07-22 11:28:44+00:00): Verbessert via surface:bicycle. Teile sind anscheinend mittlerweile auch asphaltiert, laut Mapillary.
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:23:17+00:00): Entrada a Urgencias
closed by Note Control (2021-07-24 12:06:10+00:00): mapeada
opened by Armin C (2021-07-22 08:24:51+00:00): "casa 221 Subteran A"
POI has no name
POI types: emergency-fire_hydrant
OSM data version: 2021-02-01T11:34:17Z
 #mapsme
opened by Armin C (2021-07-22 08:24:52+00:00): "Casa 233 tip B subteran"
POI has no name
POI types: emergency-fire_hydrant
OSM data version: 2021-02-01T11:34:17Z
 #mapsme
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:25:22+00:00): Farmacia Eloísa Carreño Müller
+34952471622
opened by jozin-belgium (2021-07-22 08:26:35+00:00): chiro zondag van 14 tot 18 uur

via StreetComplete 33.1
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:27:05+00:00): Farmacia Díaz Fernández
+34952472243
opened by tbo47 (2021-07-22 08:27:54+00:00): société xylem
closed by yargil (2022-05-22 09:03:14+00:00): L'info est présente.
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:27:55+00:00): aquí, no.
closed by sanchi (2021-07-23 15:38:01+00:00): corregido
opened by tbo47 (2021-07-22 08:28:17+00:00): mondial pare-brise
commented by K12230LF (2025-09-08 09:27:52+00:00): Bonjour, quelques mois après votre note, quelqu'un a indiqué : 
building=industrial
building:levels=2
name=Vasse Transfert
roof:material=tar_paper
roof:shape=flat
source=Cadastre. Mise à jour : 2010;survey;knowledge
closed by tbo47 (2025-09-08 09:40:24+00:00): Il y a de forte chance que ma note d'il y a 4 ans soit perimee... On peut fermer cette note
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:29:13+00:00): IES Santiago Ramón y Cajal
+34951269821
closed by jeslop (2021-08-10 15:50:15+00:00): Añadido.
opened by Armin C (2021-07-22 08:29:31+00:00): "casa 197 subteran tip A"
POI has no name
POI types: emergency-fire_hydrant
OSM data version: 2021-02-01T11:34:17Z
 #mapsme
closed by Tiberiu Popescu (2026-03-19 17:36:28+00:00): Done
opened by jozin-belgium (2021-07-22 08:30:01+00:00): stroomcabine

via StreetComplete 33.1
closed by A127 (2021-10-28 17:38:40+00:00): Added:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997228286
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:30:29+00:00): Мы здесь
closed by mavl (2021-07-23 03:19:15+00:00): Заметка не содержит полезных сведений для OpenStreetMap.  
This note does not contain a useful information for OpenStreetMap.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 08:30:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189733198 - is it really oneway for cyclists?

If yes - can someone take photo of signage here and upload it to Wikimedia Commons?

I am looking for something to illustrate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway:bicycle=yes
commented by andygates (2024-11-02 17:15:09+00:00): There is a painted cycle path one one side only - an "uphill only" ...
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-02 19:18:49+00:00): so in other direction you can cycle but you have no dedicated lane?

then oneway:bicycle=yes is wrong, and cycleway:right=lane is enough to mark that it has lane on one side only
closed by andygates (2025-01-31 10:41:03+00:00): Thanks for the correction, I've updated the tags.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 08:32:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187626066

is it really oneway for cyclists?

Or is it case of bicycle infrastructure being present on one side and cyclists going with cars on the other side?

If oneway:bicycle=yes is really correct - can someone take photo of signage here and upload it to Wikimedia Commons?

I am looking for something to illustrate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway:bicycle=yes

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19D1 has search for similar cases (so far all turned out to be tagging mistakes)
commented by RaccoonFederation (2022-03-29 23:38:25+00:00): This is a two way road with a cycle lane on one side is road. No signs to indicate special restrictions for cyclists
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-30 08:17:59+00:00): So oneway:bicycle=yes is incorrect...
closed by RaccoonFederation (2022-03-30 08:51:21+00:00): Yes, I have removed it
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 08:33:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537438779 - is it really oneway for cyclists and two=way for all other vehicles?

If oneway:bicycle=yes is really correct - can someone take photo of signage here and upload it to Wikimedia Commons?

I am looking for something to illustrate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway:bicycle=yes

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19D1 has search for similar cases (so far all turned out to be tagging mistakes)
commented by Hillmanjames (2022-01-04 21:29:00+00:00): Cyclists can go both ways on this section of access road. The only place cyclists can are only permitted in one direction is on the purpose built track
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2022-01-04 21:30:14+00:00): So oneway:bicycle=yes should be removed?
commented by Hillmanjames (2022-01-04 22:17:32+00:00): Yes it should be.
closed by confusedbuffalo (2022-02-05 20:29:18+00:00): Surveyed and confirmed. Tag removed
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 08:33:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339915166

- is it really oneway for cyclists and twoway for all other vehicles?

If oneway:bicycle=yes is really correct - can someone take photo of signage here and upload it to Wikimedia Commons?

I am looking for something to illustrate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway:bicycle=yes

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19D1 has search for similar cases (so far all turned out to be tagging mistakes)
closed by LateNightTone (2026-06-16 17:25:35+00:00): Removed tags, you're right it's definitely not correct.
opened by Skinoku (2021-07-22 08:34:10+00:00): Verificare presenza di colonnina per ricarica EV (brand? costo?) ed eventualmente mappare. Enel X, Gewiss?
commented by canfe (2022-06-11 10:05:35+00:00): Due prese

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/97384.jpg
closed by Skinoku (2022-06-13 13:16:45+00:00): Ciao,
grazie di aver commentato la nota con foto.
Hanno a quanto pare cambiato la colonnina in passato pare fosse una Gewiss guasta.
Aggiornato tutto.
A presto
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 08:34:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23126762

- is it really oneway for cyclists and twoway for all other vehicles?

If oneway:bicycle=yes is really correct - can someone take photo of signage here and upload it to Wikimedia Commons?

I am looking for something to illustrate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway:bicycle=yes

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19D1 has search for similar cases (so far all turned out to be tagging mistakes)
commented by user_12625593 (2021-07-22 09:17:03+00:00): Probably, northbound cyclists will have to use the parallel residential road here (as in Weert ;-) ). I can't find an image of signage in Mapillary.
closed by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 16:00:06+00:00): OK, in such case I can close it
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 08:35:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496682093

- is it really oneway for cyclists and twoway for all other vehicles?

If oneway:bicycle=yes is really correct - can someone take photo of signage here and upload it to Wikimedia Commons?

I am looking for something to illustrate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway:bicycle=yes

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19D1 has search for similar cases (so far all turned out to be tagging mistakes)
commented by user_12625593 (2021-07-22 08:55:07+00:00): Yes, southbound cyclists have to use the parallel residential road here, the main road is forbidden for them. Signage can be found here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.240327632643&lng=5.7175007503816&z=17&pKey=918625218989338&focus=photo
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 10:32:33+00:00): Do you know how can I download this specific photo from the mapillary?
commented by user_12625593 (2021-07-22 12:24:25+00:00): No
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 08:35:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521193118

- is it really oneway for cyclists and twoway for all other vehicles?

If oneway:bicycle=yes is really correct - can someone take photo of signage here and upload it to Wikimedia Commons?

I am looking for something to illustrate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway:bicycle=yes

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19D1 has search for similar cases (so far all turned out to be tagging mistakes)
commented by user_12625593 (2021-07-22 09:18:21+00:00): It's not correct here, as there's bicycle=use_sidepath which are on both sides.
commented by Jakka (2021-07-22 09:57:03+00:00): Please do correct this bad tag. And close the note
closed by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 10:29:24+00:00): done!
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 08:36:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372270991

- is it really oneway for cyclists and twoway for all other vehicles?

If oneway:bicycle=yes is really correct - can someone take photo of signage here and upload it to Wikimedia Commons?

I am looking for something to illustrate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway:bicycle=yes

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19D1 has search for similar cases (so far all turned out to be tagging mistakes)
commented by user_12625593 (2021-07-22 09:01:08+00:00): It's not correct here, as there's bicycle=use_sidepath which are on both sides.
closed by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 10:37:31+00:00): then I removed it
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:36:28+00:00): An der markierten Stelle befindet sich ein Spielplatz!
closed by wermak (2021-09-09 06:22:16+00:00): eingetragen
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:37:21+00:00): onosm.org submitted note from a business:
name: Rosewood Dental
phone: 3015152466
website: https://www.rosewooddentalmd.com/
twitter: dental_rosewood
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosewooddentalmd/
email: rosewooddental@emailsl.com
hours: M-W: 8am-5pm; Th: 10a-7p F: 8a-3p Sa: 8a-1p
category: General Dentistry
address: 13026 Middlebrook Rd  Germantown, MD 20874
opened by waterman (2021-07-22 08:37:26+00:00): Unable to answer "What are the opening hours of Post (Post Office)?" for https://osm.org/node/655262001 via StreetComplete 33.1:

Engel&Völkers
commented by Diodora (2021-07-22 18:03:06+00:00): nur ein Briefkasten

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/50798.jpg
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 08:37:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696628989

Is it really oneway for cyclists and twoway for all other vehicles?

If oneway:bicycle=yes is really correct - can someone take photo of signage here and upload it to Wikimedia Commons?

I am looking for something to illustrate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway:bicycle=yes

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19D1 has search for similar cases (so far all turned out to be tagging mistakes)
closed by shiki87 (2022-10-18 11:52:42+00:00): On this Street you can drive with any vehicle booth ways.
It is a tagging mistake sadly.
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-18 12:23:52+00:00): then it should be fixed and oneway:bicycle=yes tag removed
closed by shiki87 (2022-10-18 19:05:56+00:00): It should be fixed now.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 08:37:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484997865


Is it really oneway for cyclists and twoway for all other vehicles?

If oneway:bicycle=yes is really correct - can someone take photo of signage here and upload it to Wikimedia Commons?

I am looking for something to illustrate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway:bicycle=yes

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19D1 has search for similar cases (so far all turned out to be tagging mistakes)
closed by TobiasRad (2023-10-04 08:18:26+00:00): oneway:bicycle=yes is really correct in direction right/ east, because on the other side the cycle path is designated
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 08:38:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40294904

Is it really oneway for cyclists and twoway for all other vehicles?

If oneway:bicycle=yes is really correct - can someone take photo of signage here and upload it to Wikimedia Commons?

I am looking for something to illustrate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway:bicycle=yes

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19D1 has search for similar cases (so far all turned out to be tagging mistakes)
closed by Wulf4096 (2021-07-24 13:11:21+00:00): Tag entfernt.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 08:38:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/925929761

Is it really oneway for cyclists and twoway for all other vehicles?

If oneway:bicycle=yes is really correct - can someone take photo of signage here and upload it to Wikimedia Commons?

I am looking for something to illustrate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway:bicycle=yes

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19D1 has search for similar cases (so far all turned out to be tagging mistakes)
commented by Morphior (2021-08-10 20:38:58+00:00): As far as I'm aware, the road is two-way (one lane per direction) and there is one sidewalk per road side, both of which are shared pedestrian and bike sidewalks. The bikes are only allowed to go on the sidewalk that's on the right side of the road in the direction of travel. I hope this clears it up.
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-12 12:25:28+00:00): so each sidewalk is oneway, in opposite direction - but entirety is two way (as each sidewalk leads in a different direction for cyclists)?
commented by Morphior (2021-08-15 19:08:06+00:00): I just took a photo of the signs: http://imgur.com/a/xNQU8Mf
As you can see, there are sidewalks on both sides of the road, but the signs say that bikes are only allowed on one side (that being the right side). I'm not 100 % certain that it's the same thing in the other direction but I'd take an educated guess that it is.
commented by ulrichkniess (2022-08-28 14:25:12+00:00): Actually no cycle-way in either direction. Only pedestrians-sign with „bikes allowed“ exception underneath. This should not count as bicycle lanes.
closed by G4rden3r (2023-04-06 07:29:21+00:00): i changed it to cycleway:X:oneway=yes, this should fit much better
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 08:38:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/585093016

Is it really oneway for cyclists and twoway for all other vehicles?

If oneway:bicycle=yes is really correct - can someone take photo of signage here and upload it to Wikimedia Commons?

I am looking for something to illustrate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway:bicycle=yes

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19D1 has search for similar cases (so far all turned out to be tagging mistakes)
commented by Wulf4096 (2021-07-24 12:55:18+00:00): oneway:bicycle=yes ist wohl der Versuch, ne Radwegbenutzungspflicht in OSM abzubilden. Vor Ort gibt es keine entsprechende Beschilderung.
commented by Wulf4096 (2021-07-24 13:25:05+00:00): Ich schau mir das nochmal vor Ort an. Ich glaube, der in OSM eingemalte separate Radweg ist nicht straßenbegleitend, ergo darf man hier auch stets auf der Fahrbahn radeln.

Sorry Mateusz, it's really hard to find real "oneway:bicycle=yes" situations  ;-)
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-24 17:36:08+00:00): So oneway:bicycle=yes should be removed here and NOT replaced by bicycle=use_sidepath (or its variant bicycle:forward=use_sidepath)?
closed by Wulf4096 (2021-07-24 18:15:28+00:00): Yep. I hopefully improved this with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108541852

And indeed, the northern cycleway is legally separated from the road. Despite any traffic signs it should be legal to cycle on the general lane between Goldbekufer and Grasweg.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 08:38:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493493227

Is it really oneway for cyclists and twoway for all other vehicles?

If oneway:bicycle=yes is really correct - can someone take photo of signage here and upload it to Wikimedia Commons?

I am looking for something to illustrate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway:bicycle=yes

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19D1 has search for similar cases (so far all turned out to be tagging mistakes)
closed by Wulf4096 (2021-07-24 13:03:04+00:00): hmm.... denke das kann man während der Bauarbeiten so lassen. Radverkehr gen Osten verläuft über die südliche Richtungsfahrbahn. Sobald die mit der Baustelle fertig sind, wird das für alle Fahrzeuge oneway=yes sein.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-22 08:38:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672883864



Is it really oneway for cyclists and twoway for all other vehicles?

If oneway:bicycle=yes is really correct - can someone take photo of signage here and upload it to Wikimedia Commons?

I am looking for something to illustrate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway:bicycle=yes

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19D1 has search for similar cases (so far all turned out to be tagging mistakes)
commented by Wulf4096 (2022-05-18 19:56:46+00:00): it's not a driving lane but 5 hgv parking slots. no 1way-signs otg, and when slots are occupied, you can only exit here

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/93944.jpg
closed by ma-rt-in (2022-07-30 18:57:20+00:00): done
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:38:30+00:00): escaleras
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:40:09+00:00): piscina
opened by scai (2021-07-22 08:40:49+00:00): Existiert diese Lücke im Radweg noch?
Die Rad-Route Niederlausitzer Kreisel ist hier (etwas weiter südlich und etwas weiter nördlich) unterbrochen.
closed by S34ml3ss (2021-10-04 22:14:55+00:00): Ich habe mal die Pipeline entfernt
opened by Skinoku (2021-07-22 08:41:11+00:00): Verificare presenza colonnina ricarica EV
closed by canfe (2024-04-04 06:53:32+00:00): messa
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:41:13+00:00): piscina
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:41:37+00:00): parking
opened by Thibtib51 (2021-07-22 08:41:42+00:00): 1,8 m
opened by FinixFighter (2021-07-22 08:44:59+00:00): "battery bin inside this shop"
POI name: TEDi
POI types: shop
OSM data version: 2021-07-03T10:31:00Z
 #organicmaps
closed by FinixFighter (2021-07-22 11:56:55+00:00): Solved
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:45:15+00:00): Holiday World Riwo Hotel
https://www.holidayworld.es/es/hotel-holiday-world-riwo-en-malaga/?partner=5505&utm_source=google&utm_medium=gmb&utm_campaign=web_link
+34952579757
opened by jozin-belgium (2021-07-22 08:45:46+00:00): Equipona

via StreetComplete 33.1
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:45:57+00:00): Cafeteria
opened by Aleg Surta (2021-07-22 08:46:52+00:00): Could anyone from locals please update name of this trail? 
According to official park brochure, https://www.parks.ca.gov/pages/422/files/RichardsonGroveFinalWebLayout2018.pdf , here Durphy Creek ends and Tan Oak Springs begins, but exactly place is unknown.
opened by Armin C (2021-07-22 08:47:05+00:00): "casa 195 Tip A subteran"
POI has no name
POI types: emergency-fire_hydrant
OSM data version: 2021-02-01T11:34:17Z
 #mapsme
closed by Tiberiu Popescu (2026-03-19 17:37:21+00:00): Done
opened by Armin C (2021-07-22 08:47:05+00:00): "Casa 165 Tip A subteran"
POI has no name
POI types: emergency-fire_hydrant
OSM data version: 2021-02-01T11:34:17Z
 #mapsme
closed by Tiberiu Popescu (2026-03-19 17:14:08+00:00): Done
opened by Armin C (2021-07-22 08:47:06+00:00): "Casa 160 Subteran A"
POI has no name
POI types: emergency-fire_hydrant
OSM data version: 2021-02-01T11:34:17Z
 #mapsme
closed by Tiberiu Popescu (2026-03-19 17:35:03+00:00): Done
opened by Armin C (2021-07-22 08:47:06+00:00): "Casa 138 Subteran tip A"
POI has no name
POI types: emergency-fire_hydrant
OSM data version: 2021-02-01T11:34:17Z
 #mapsme
closed by Tiberiu Popescu (2026-03-19 17:25:30+00:00): Done
opened by AKSHAYA KOKKOTHAMANGALAM (VELLIYAKULAM) (2021-07-22 08:48:45+00:00): AKSHAYA KOKKOTHAMANGALAM (VELLIYAKULAM)
closed by indigomc (2021-07-23 06:27:33+00:00): is marked
opened by osmhanno (2021-07-22 08:49:03+00:00): The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI name: Stavros
POI types: amenity-restaurant
OSM data version: 2021-05-24T07:43:34Z
 #mapsme
closed by kmpoppe (2025-05-06 07:35:59+00:00): deleted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155407078
opened by jozin-belgium (2021-07-22 08:49:45+00:00): vuilnisbak oranje plastic

via StreetComplete 33.1
closed by A127 (2021-10-28 17:31:16+00:00): Toegevoegd:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9208186293
opened by hans_from_stuttgart (2021-07-22 08:50:56+00:00): Unable to answer "Are these opening hours for Adam Travel (Travel Agency) still correct?" for https://osm.org/node/6897166956 via StreetComplete 33.1:

I don't know what to tag this as

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/50737.jpg
commented by mardiz (2021-08-05 10:25:58+00:00): maybe wrong picture?
commented by hans_from_stuttgart (2021-08-06 09:45:43+00:00): The actual gallery had no text on it, just some big glass fronts with pictures inside. 

That was a sign outside that had some information about the exibit. It doesn't look like a permanent installation, so unsure what to tag it as
commented by deret (2021-08-09 10:53:26+00:00): The Pilecki institut the photograph referenced is separately tagged (and its entry is about as old as the Adam travel one, so both likely existed in parallel).

Question is if the travel place is still around and you just didn't find it (online results look like its not on ground floor, but an office on the 1st floor) or if it closed - the website is offline, but no other clear evidence its gone online.
closed by deret (2025-08-20 13:43:36+00:00): looked into this again, company was dissolved -> deleted, done.
opened by YaStratospheric (2021-07-22 08:51:53+00:00): Could you check this place, there is feedback from the driver, which shows that driver could not make a U-turn at the intersection. Maybe a U-turn restriction here?
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:51:53+00:00): Hier sollte meines Erachtens die Trientlgasse 77, in Innsbruck sein.

https://www.deinelagerbox.at/ hat dort den Unternehmenssitz.
closed by Hungerburg (2021-08-31 21:42:03+00:00): Dem ist so, nicht erst seit gestern. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110533647
opened by ArtеmSurovitsky (2021-07-22 08:52:33+00:00): Could please check if there is a gas station here?
Potrebbe per favore controllare se c'è una stazione di servizio qui?
closed by ivanbranco (2025-05-09 20:26:54+00:00): nothing visible on aerial imagery after 4 years
opened by Pan Perníček (2021-07-22 08:52:40+00:00): Forwarding anonymous report from #Mapy.cz user, please verify: This building is not existing anymore and  Kamień Budowlany EL-KAM Sp. z o.o is not located here. There is a big parking here.
closed by Piotr Strębski (2021-11-19 14:31:35+00:00): Confirmed and fixed
opened by  (2021-07-22 08:52:54+00:00): Hier ist eine gefasste Quelle direkt am Weg (N49° 29.156, E08° 04.696).
Konnte aber keinen Namen oder Bezeichnung entdecken.
Das Wasser läuft unter dem Weg dem Höninger Bach zu.
closed by user_13975366 (2021-08-23 22:03:41+00:00): Quelle und Wasserablauf hinzugefügt.