piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
opened by Buster452 (2021-03-21 17:14:40+00:00): arizona land department "desert wells" multi use area.  lots of atv and motorcycle trails.  parking lot to south.  gravel road to gravel parking lot.  no restrooms or water.
commented by Buster452 (2021-03-23 05:35:16+00:00): Got the parking lot and road going in tagged.  Still not sure how to tag this entire recreation area though.
closed by Buster452 (2021-04-05 01:39:14+00:00): We'll try a sports pitch with moto as the sport.
opened by Nordseeküstenradweg (2021-03-21 17:15:34+00:00): laut Website ist das "La pura vida" geschlossen. Kann das jemand bestätigen?
closed by Gyllenpilen (2021-08-23 11:05:48+00:00): Ist jetzt eine Fahrschule.
opened by dreua (2021-03-21 17:16:43+00:00): business

via StreetComplete 31.0

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/33684.jpg
opened by AnyFile (2021-03-21 17:16:46+00:00): Qui c'è un passaggio
commented by airon90 (2022-07-03 07:13:01+00:00): È già stato mappato, vero?
commented by AnyFile (2022-07-12 21:04:23+00:00): Non credo

Purtroppo non mi ricordo bene, essendo passato da lì molto tempo fa, ma da come ho scritto la nota, presumo si riferisse ad un passaggio dal punto della nota verso Est.
opened by AnyFile (2021-03-21 17:16:46+00:00): Access da controllare (penso che pedoni e biciclette possano passare e forse anche altro)
opened by AnyFile (2021-03-21 17:16:47+00:00): Qui c'è un passaggio
commented by airon90 (2022-07-03 07:12:47+00:00): È già stato mappato, vero?
commented by AnyFile (2022-07-12 21:04:43+00:00): Non credo

Purtroppo non mi ricordo bene, essendo passato da lì molto tempo fa, ma da come ho scritto la nota, presumo si riferisse ad un passaggio dal punto della nota verso Est.
opened by Buster452 (2021-03-21 17:17:39+00:00): gate to south.  access permitted with state trust permit.  somedry camping along highway with no hookups, no water, no toilets.  caravans ok.
closed by Buster452 (2021-03-22 05:41:52+00:00): Added the gate and the road into this area.
opened by Mshuaib (2021-03-21 17:18:04+00:00): Golden Homes جولدن هومز تصميم داخلي وديكور
opened by 판리자 (2021-03-21 17:20:20+00:00): 전광훈 = 사이비 교주
namu.wiki/w/전광훈
opened by dreua (2021-03-21 17:20:20+00:00): Funkturm

via StreetComplete 31.0

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/33685.jpg
https://westnordost.de/p/33686.jpg
opened by philipp-rupert (2021-03-21 17:20:29+00:00): Unable to answer "What surface does this path have here?" for https://osm.org/way/136201684 via StreetComplete 31.0:

kein erkennbarer Weg

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/33687.jpg
closed by user_12328418 (2021-03-21 19:04:25+00:00): falls etwas nicht mehr existiert, kann es auch gelöscht werden:
erledigt.
opened by philipp-rupert (2021-03-21 17:20:31+00:00): Unable to answer "Is this still here? (Telephone)" for https://osm.org/node/898250602 via StreetComplete 31.0:

nicht mehr da

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/33688.jpg
closed by user_12328418 (2021-03-21 19:00:38+00:00): erledigt
opened by Svbway (2021-03-21 17:20:52+00:00): Unable to answer "What is the house number of this building?" for https://osm.org/way/394021604 via StreetComplete 22.3:

Elsa-Brandstroemstrasse 17 und Röntgenstrasse 4 und 6 gehören diesem Hauskomplex an.
closed by Planet Express (2024-07-14 16:52:53+00:00): Hausnummern korrigiert
opened by  (2021-03-21 17:22:08+00:00): Manfred's Meadow
closed by Rps333 (2021-03-21 18:48:01+00:00): added
opened by Tristan Scott (2021-03-21 17:22:38+00:00): the egg shed - farm shop

via StreetComplete 26.2
closed by Tristan Scott (2021-06-07 20:01:22+00:00): now on map
opened by Jhon Billy (2021-03-21 17:23:20+00:00): "Chambira"
POI name: Shambira
POI types: waterway-river
OSM data version: 2021-02-01T11:34:17Z
 #mapsme
closed by ovruni (2021-03-21 21:00:17+00:00): Modificado, cerrando nota
opened by Jhon Billy (2021-03-21 17:23:20+00:00): "No existe, el pueblo es a la entrada del río tigrillo"
The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI name: Nuevo Progreso
POI types: place-hamlet
OSM data version: 2021-02-01T11:34:17Z
 #mapsme
closed by ovruni (2021-03-21 20:25:12+00:00): Nodo retirado, cerrando nota
opened by Jhon Billy (2021-03-21 17:23:21+00:00): "el río se llama Chambira"
POI name: Patayacu
POI types: waterway-river
OSM data version: 2021-02-01T11:34:17Z
 #mapsme
opened by Geovelo_Notes (2021-03-21 17:25:37+00:00): Paris (This note has been created from Geovelo : http://amenagements-cyclables.fr/fr/contributions/19362)
closed by kartonage (2021-03-22 06:19:37+00:00): Feel free to provide meaningful information, otherwise this note does not contain anything to add to the map. Notes are publicly visible and meant for improvements and error corrections. Thanks.
opened by _caleb (2021-03-21 17:26:49+00:00): this should be abandoned building, streetcomplete says it was a commercial building.

via StreetComplete 31.0
closed by _caleb (2021-04-19 18:26:23+00:00): addressed
opened by _caleb (2021-03-21 17:26:49+00:00): address number is 4610

via StreetComplete 31.0
closed by _caleb (2021-03-24 16:36:29+00:00): Addressed
opened by zgroza (2021-03-21 17:27:42+00:00): Tutaj jest również droga w kierunku Kowalewka
closed by kubahahaha (2021-03-24 23:34:49+00:00): Drysowałem
opened by Jan'ek (2021-03-21 17:30:37+00:00): Niepoprawnie zaadresowana okolica. Zastosowano skrót imienia nazwy drogi: "Krzysztofa K. Baczyńskiego" powinno być: "Krzysztofa Kamila Baczyńskiego". Wobec tego poprawny adres Kancelarii parafialnej występuje jako adres "samotny".
closed by Ancymon (2021-12-16 20:33:18+00:00): Wygląda, że jest już ok.
closed by Jan'ek (2021-12-19 21:56:56+00:00): No rzeczywiście, wygląda poprawnie i na budynkach też - brawo Ty.
opened by ALu68 (2021-03-21 17:31:42+00:00): Baustelle

via StreetComplete 28.1

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/33689.jpg
commented by Osmwithspace (2021-07-25 13:17:55+00:00): Sieht so aus, als stünde die Baustelle kurz vor der Fertigstellung.

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/51204.jpg
opened by  (2021-03-21 17:33:34+00:00): hello
closed by kartonage (2021-03-22 06:20:02+00:00): Feel free to provide meaningful information, otherwise this note does not contain anything to add to the map. Notes are publicly visible and meant for improvements and error corrections. Thanks.
opened by lebig63 (2021-03-21 17:33:36+00:00): "4 secured metal boxes to park bikes"
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-bicycle_parking
OSM data version: 2021-02-01T11:34:17Z
 #mapsme
closed by Syl (2021-05-17 12:43:25+00:00): Détails ajoutés
opened by Sifu Hotman (2021-03-21 17:33:45+00:00): tin roof and solar panels

via StreetComplete 31.0
closed by Sifu Hotman (2021-03-31 20:39:45+00:00): added roof:material type metal
opened by  (2021-03-21 17:35:51+00:00): onosm.org submitted note from a business:
name: Pritula Homes
phone: 905-650-3216
website: 
twitter: 
facebook: https://m.facebook.com/pritula.homes
email: Pritulahomes@gmail.com
hours: Monday-Sunday 8am to 5pm 
category: Contractors
address: 5 Bascary crescent
closed by Rps333 (2021-03-21 18:45:57+00:00): added
opened by ulrich_ (2021-03-21 17:40:08+00:00): Is there a summit (volcano) called "Fagradalsfjall"? This name is often referred to in the press in connection with the volcano eruption in march 2021.
commented by Morten Lange (2021-03-21 23:13:30+00:00): There is a small mountain called Fagradalsfjall. The current eruption is just east of it.  And because of that and beacuse the volcanic system  goes by the name of the mountain, the current eruption often goes by that name, especially in English.
The node you are looking for is right by this note. Look here :  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8539528378#map=17/63.88913/-22.26934&layers=N
closed by ulrich_ (2021-03-22 22:27:10+00:00): Ok.
commented by kuhni74 (2021-03-23 12:10:56+00:00): In https://is.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fagradalsfjall_(Reykjanesskagi) and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fagradalsfjall, they write that the summit is 385 m a.s.l. This would be the case only for Langhóll - is Fagradalsfjall and Langhóll the same? "Langhóll" does not exist in the Icelandic Wikipedia.
commented by kuhni74 (2021-03-23 12:13:23+00:00): The maps in https://www.vulkankultour.de/2021/03/19/erneut-starke-erdbeben-auf-reykjanes/ point to a shoulder southeast of Langhóll, which is definitely below 300m a.s.l.
commented by kuhni74 (2021-03-23 19:00:01+00:00): On https://www.maps.is/base/@341406,382358,z6,0 it appears to me as if Fagradalsfjall is the name of the whole massif and Langhóll is its highest summit - is that possible?
commented by kuhni74 (2021-03-23 19:19:03+00:00): ditto https://kortasja.lmi.is/mapview/ --> basemap (grunnkort) --> atlas
reopened by Nic727 (2021-03-26 01:21:25+00:00): Where is the node for Fagradalsfjall then?
commented by kuhni74 (2021-03-26 09:09:48+00:00): Langhóll (alt_name). The problem is that in OSM, it is not easily possible to tag a mountain massiv that consists of several summits.
commented by ulrich_ (2021-03-26 12:02:24+00:00): I propose to tag the whole massif as an area:
natural=mountain_range
place=region
region:type=mountain_area
name=Fagradalsfjall

The summit should be tagged like
natural=peak
name=Langhóll

I am not sure about the exact locations. @kuhni74: may you try to do it?
closed by kuhni74 (2021-03-26 12:04:23+00:00): the boundary is unclear, and this is the problem, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Massif
commented by kuhni74 (2021-03-26 12:13:43+00:00): we could take the existing object https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12192181
commented by kuhni74 (2021-03-26 14:21:40+00:00): I tagged this object "Fagradalsfjall", looks good - what do you think?
commented by Nic727 (2021-03-26 21:36:42+00:00): Looks good, but what's the northern part that come from nowhere?
commented by kuhni74 (2021-03-29 11:25:38+00:00): which northern part do you mean?
commented by Morten Lange (2021-03-29 23:03:37+00:00): The small "island" in the relation, visible here:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12192181#map=17/63.91965/-22.30985
commented by Morten Lange (2021-03-29 23:03:53+00:00): I guess...
commented by kuhni74 (2021-03-30 12:15:18+00:00): Ah, yes, probably. Guess we would have to ask Tómas Ingi, who mapped the object.
commented by flother (2021-04-08 09:42:57+00:00): I've extended the area of Fagradalsfjall to match the data provided by the National Land Survey of Iceland. I've also tagged it as a mountain range instead of volcanic_lava_field/bare_rock. But it feels like the tagging system is a little unsatisfactory for this sort of thing.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102549720
commented by kuhni74 (2021-04-08 14:02:41+00:00): Thank you! What made you decide where the "border" of the area is?
I'm afraid, it's still unsatisfactory... Particularly as it fails to be rendered in OSM viewer (which it should, definitely).
closed by Nic727 (2021-04-08 15:52:12+00:00): This whole area is weirdly made. According to real data the mountain range should be using natural=fell. In the future I will try to do a data import using recent geological and vegetation data for Reykjanes peninsula and the whole island.
commented by flother (2021-04-08 17:00:06+00:00): The boundary comes from Landmælingar Íslands, Iceland's national land survey agency. It's not easy to link to the source data, but you can get it from the örnefni IS 50V GeoPackage, available at https://www.lmi.is/is/landupplysingar/gagnagrunnar/nidurhal.

I think it's better to think of OSM as a geographic database rather than just one map rendered on openstreetmap.org. For that reason, it's better to have correct data than it is to have wrong data rendered on openstreetmap.org. Other maps and projects will benefit from having it tagged as a mountain range.

I do really think that names of mountain ranges should be rendered on the default openstreetmap.org map though. Does someone want to file a bug at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto?

I'm not convinced Fagradalsfjall should be tagged as a fell. It's a mountain, a massif, or possibly a mountain range. It's just unfortunate that usable tags don't exist, or they're not labelled on openstreetmap.org.
commented by Nic727 (2021-04-08 17:17:41+00:00): Oh no, what I mean is that I’m ok to use mountain range. What I mean is the vegetation that could be another element is supposed to be fell instead of what was used previously.
commented by flother (2021-04-08 17:25:58+00:00): Ah, gotcha. Yeah, that makes sense.
commented by Morten Lange (2021-04-08 20:26:19+00:00): Nic727 wrote: "In the future I will try to do a data import using recent geological and vegetation data for Reykjanes peninsula and the whole island."   I think the lack of suitable tags for sparsely vegetated landcover (but not bare rock) needs a discussion. Iceland has this (sparse moss and lichen) but many other places as well in arctic regions or high up in mountains.  On the tagging email-list or on OSM-wiki? The icelandic email-list should be informed as well, I think.
commented by kuhni74 (2021-05-21 08:41:41+00:00): The situation is still very unsatisfactory. "Fagradalsfjall" is still not visible in OSM (only as "alt_name" of its highest peak "Langholl", if you deliberately search for it on OSM, and hardly anybody is going to do that...). Also "Fagridalur" is not visible in OSM, since - tagged as "natural=valley" - it is not rendered. Now somebody has chosen to call the new lava field "Fagradalshraun", although Fagridalur is really opposite the fjall, which is utterly misleading. Maps are forming media coverage, and unsatisfactory maps cause wrong media articles. And this only happens for the sake of keeping the systematics of OSM right, ignoring whether it is useful to the public... This is very disappointing...
commented by kuhni74 (2021-05-21 09:17:32+00:00): Now I at least changed the punctual valley items (Fagridalur, Meradalir) into linear so that they will be displayed at least in OTM (given a few days time).
opened by arya_yadav_8888 (2021-03-21 17:41:45+00:00): Yadav's nagar
closed by arya_yadav_8888 (2021-03-21 17:42:10+00:00): Chiranjeev hospital
closed by arya_yadav_8888 (2021-03-21 17:42:58+00:00): Chiranjeev hospital
opened by Patchanka (2021-03-21 17:42:26+00:00): dépot de bus Keolis
closed by Patchanka (2021-04-14 10:22:26+00:00): ajouté
opened by  (2021-03-21 17:42:48+00:00): Service Odontologie de Guéret
commented by mawy33 (2021-04-23 21:51:24+00:00): qu'est ce donc ?
closed by zorglubu (2023-12-04 12:46:40+00:00): Fermé note anonyme pas claire.
opened by  (2021-03-21 17:43:44+00:00): Bonjour le chemin en pointillé rouge est un chemin privée, je vous demande de le retirer.
Merci.
Cordialement.
closed by josmougn (2021-05-12 18:56:46+00:00): chemin indiqué "privé" dans osm
opened by arya_yadav_8888 (2021-03-21 17:43:47+00:00): Chiranjeev hospital
closed by indigomc (2021-11-26 09:05:21+00:00): marked nearby
opened by Younes Sellami (2021-03-21 17:44:02+00:00): دار المفروشات
closed by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-10 18:03:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2588333#map=15/36.20050/5.41168&layers=N
closed by NeisBot (2024-01-17 17:54:17+00:00): This note has the identical location and text 
as note https://osm.org/note/2588331

Therefore, it will be closed.

#DuplicateNote
closed by Younes Sellami (2021-03-21 17:45:11+00:00): دار المفروشات
commented by Younes Sellami (2021-03-21 17:46:08+00:00): دار المفروشات
commented by Younes Sellami (2021-03-21 17:46:44+00:00): حي لعرارسة مقابل فندق زيدان كيما لفاروج ولاية سطيف .
opened by Buster452 (2021-03-21 17:44:48+00:00): gated to south, no public access.  service road.
closed by Buster452 (2021-03-22 05:41:53+00:00): Adjusted highway to service road
opened by Buster452 (2021-03-21 17:45:41+00:00): locked gate
closed by Buster452 (2021-03-22 05:41:52+00:00): Added gate and set access to No
opened by ハルシオン (2021-03-21 17:45:44+00:00): 東金青年の森公園
opened by fotomarcina (2021-03-21 17:45:49+00:00): Budynek już od kilku lat nie istnieje.
opened by anna d'ettorre (2021-03-21 17:46:41+00:00): casa Poderino
closed by simo_explorer (2024-01-31 13:41:15+00:00): fix with changeset/146905457
opened by do1fmd (2021-03-21 17:47:22+00:00): Die Hausnummern stimmen hier nicht

via StreetComplete 31.0
closed by Herwescheluc (2024-03-15 18:17:52+00:00): berichtigt
opened by amitiel01 (2021-03-21 17:47:42+00:00): Amitiel Estetica
commented by amitiel01 (2021-03-21 17:47:59+00:00): Amitiel Estetica
opened by  (2021-03-21 17:47:42+00:00): Routenfehler ?
Ich kann dort durch fahren, aber die RoutingEngine möchte nicht.
Einfach mal einen Startpunkt 100 Meter dem Strassenverlauf hoch bzw einen Endpunkt 100 Meter runter setzen und routen lassen.

Durchfahrt ist mit Fahrrad/Motorrad/PKW möglich, LKW weiss ich nicht ob es erlaubt ist, wäre aber möglich
commented by limes11 (2021-03-24 20:42:41+00:00): Das liegt an Weg 37516347
closed by Galbinus (2021-04-28 09:04:34+00:00): Da vor ca. 1 Monat der Access-Wert von diesem Teilstück von mir korrigiert wurde, sehe ich den Fehlerhinweis als erledigt an. Routingproblem dürfte es hier nicht mehr geben, es sei denn, es wird mit sehr veralteten Daten geroutet.
opened by  (2021-03-21 17:47:54+00:00): Hier soll wohl noch ein Querweg sein.
closed by Scout Jens (2021-12-07 11:12:34+00:00): Ich konnte einen Weg sehen auf dem Luftbild und habe ihn ergänzt
opened by Bene Blablabla (2021-03-21 17:47:55+00:00): Unable to answer "Are these opening hours for Marrakech Boutique (Clothing Store) still correct?" for https://osm.org/node/6284200219 via StreetComplete 31.0:

Eine MPU-Begleitung

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/33690.jpg
closed by ironspock (2022-12-03 17:20:00+00:00): aktualisiert
opened by Younes Sellami (2021-03-21 17:48:35+00:00): حي لعرارسة مقابل فندق زيدان كيما لفاروج بالضبط مدينة سطيف
opened by Emilio Eugenio (2021-03-21 17:48:40+00:00): "No es su ubicación. El castillo es el ayuntamiento."
The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI name: Castillo de Monaspe
POI types: historic-castle historic-ruins
OSM data version: 2021-02-01T11:34:17Z
 #mapsme
opened by user_6471069 (2021-03-21 17:49:08+00:00): Ten landuse ma ustawione alt_name=Osiedle Zula. Chyba nawet rodowici tyszanie nie słyszeli o takiej nazwie (Google też nie).
closed by zuicz (2021-03-22 11:06:12+00:00): Usunąłem
opened by user_3022894 (2021-03-21 17:49:32+00:00): Dieses öffentliche Telefon gibt es glaube ich nicht mehr, oder?
commented by wkdgs (2021-12-04 14:08:40+00:00): Hab dort keins gesehen.
closed by user_3022894 (2021-12-05 13:06:56+00:00): Alles klar. Ich danke dir! Hab's gelöscht.
opened by Thiago Lazzari (2021-03-21 17:51:12+00:00): "Trilha de fácil acesso"
POI name: Cascata Borella
POI types: waterway-waterfall
OSM data version: 2019-11-24T01:08:45Z
 #mapsme
opened by Jan'ek (2021-03-21 17:51:19+00:00): Samotny adres. Do ulicy: "Wolności" daleko. Czy nie powinno być tylko: addr:place = Lubrza ?
closed by maraf24 (2021-06-14 17:58:56+00:00): Tylko niecałe 2km, zdarzają się większe odległości :)
W Polsce adresy nadaje się wg najbliższej nazwanej ulicy, choćby odłegłej, więc ten adres jest ok.
commented by Jan'ek (2021-06-16 10:46:37+00:00): No tak, ale domy obok mają: 57b addr:place=Dytmarów, a 96 addr:place=Lubrza, brak ulicy. Trochę to nie za bardzo (brak logiki i konsekwencji). No i program "mrówki" wykazywał błąd. Teraz już nie widzę błędu, może jest OK. Popatrz jeszcze raz i napisz co myślisz.
commented by maraf24 (2021-06-16 18:04:22+00:00): Te adresy z Lubrzy są w danych oficjalnych, brak podstaw do ich kwestionowania.
Adres 57b jest sprzed 8 lat i nie wiadomo, czy to jest dalej prawidłowe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2255008339/history
commented by Jan'ek (2021-06-19 21:05:20+00:00): Kwestionować nie kwestionuję co tam w urzędach jest (niejeden bałagan) :-). Pomijając 57b, 96 i 98 też nie mają ulicy tylko: addr:place=Lubrza, więc coś z tym 94 lub z pozostałymi jest nie tak. Poza tym, na mapach OpenStreet nie widzi adresu "Lubrza, Wolności 94" a same "Lubrza 94" widzi.
closed by Jan'ek (2021-07-10 23:50:24+00:00): Odległość ulicy o ~ 2 km w adresie jest niepoprawne - niezależnie od danych oficjalnych (bajzel urzędniczy) tym bardziej, że obok przebiega inna droga bez nazwy. Zmieniłem na: addr:place=Lubrza. Zgodnie z założeniami OpenStreet. Obiekt jest jakąś "starocią przemysłową", więc w adresach w zasadzie nie jest tak istotny.
commented by maraf24 (2021-07-11 15:18:08+00:00): Odległość ulicy od adresu może być dowolna -oczywiście w ramach granicy miejscowości. 
POI tutaj posługuje się adresem, który był poprzednio.
Adres zmieniłeś więc na podstawie czego?
commented by maraf24 (2021-07-11 15:21:34+00:00): http://agromat.pl/kontakt/
Lubrza ul. Wolności 94
48-231 Lubrza
Jak widać adres oficjalny z ulicą jest adresem tutaj używanym.
commented by Jan'ek (2021-07-11 19:48:52+00:00): Jest to logiczny ciąg numerów w tym samym obszarze: 94, 96, 98. Jak już wcześniej pisałem nr 96, 98 z tego samego ciągu nie mają ul. Wolności - wskazuje to wyraźnie na jakieś niedopatrzenie. Korygowałem już adresy oficjalne na Geoportalu a w terenie było inaczej. Jednak jeśli uważasz, że w tym miejscu jest faktycznie używany adres z ulicą gdzieś tam z innego rejonu (Wolności) to zostawiam sprawę otwartą. Tyle że, nikt tam nie dojedzie używając map OpenStreet  (można i tak, a poco mają tam jeździć :-)
commented by kubahahaha (2021-07-12 11:43:50+00:00): Jeśli adres jest podany na stronie kontaktu do jakiejś firmy to nie widzę zupełnie żadnego powodu żeby go zmieniać.
Wycofałem zmianę adresu.
Nawigacje na podstawie OSM znajdą ten adres, to tylko Nominatim na problem z wyszukaniem go.
Jeśli wiadomo że istnieje tu adres Lubrza 94 to można dodać go osobno, jako punkt, ale konieczne jest uźródłowienie.
commented by Jan'ek (2021-07-12 16:23:00+00:00): To proponuję w mapach googla wpisać adres: "Wolności 94, 48-231 Lubrza". Otrzymamy inną lokalizację centrali a właściwie dwie lokalizacje + ta tutaj filia z uwagą. Nawigacja "MapFaktor Navigator" też nie widzi tej lokalizacji, wskazuje punkt obok "Wolności 92". No Panowie, to jak pojedziemy do tej firmy - z rzekomym adresem oficjalnym - tu na stację Dytmarów, czy bardziej w kierunku Laskowic (mapy googla) a może na pole obok "Wolności 92"? :-) Nie wszystko jest takie oczywiste jak się wydaje. To, że firma podaje jakiś adres, to wcale nie znaczy, że dotyczy właśnie tej lokalizacji. (coś ta firma pokiełbasiła).
commented by kubahahaha (2021-07-12 18:14:13+00:00): Nie możemy wykorzystywać map Google do tworzenia OSM ze względu na licencję, podejrzewam że tak samo jak MapFactor. Dodatkowo Mapy Google często podają błędną lokalizację adresów albo złe kody pocztowe.
Adresy w Polsce przypisuje się budynkom, a nie działkom. Nie muszą też być po kolei obok siebie.
Skoro nie wiesz jaka jest poprawna lokalizacja to czemu chcesz całkiem skasować taki adres? No i z jakiego powodu nie tutaj? Bo GMaps inaczej mówi?
commented by Jan'ek (2021-07-13 15:02:16+00:00): Człowieku! - co ty gadasz, gdzie jest napisane, że chcę usunąć ten adres? Adres jest osadzony niepoprawnie co widać w stosunku do innych budynków. Jeśli budynek jest oddalony o więcej niż 150m od drogi (załóżmy) to należy wykonać do niego podjazd (kwestia odległości ~2km i zasady na OpenStret) Nic nie chcę usuwać, chcę ustalić poprawne otagowanie do tego miejsca - czytaj dokładniej. Prawdopodobnie -tak myślę- centrala mieści się tam gdzie podaje Google a tutaj jest filia, jakiś magazyn z tablicą do centrali (stąd problem) A jak jest naprawdę? można jedynie sprawdzić na miejscu. Jeszcze raz przypominam: dostrzegłem brak logiki i konsekwencji w tym miejscu. Już widzę jak ktoś przywozi Cię na ul. Wolności a do budynku 94 z buta 2km. Oczywiście, są miejscowości co nie potrafią nazwać drogi choć biegnie obok a adres przypisują na drugim końcu wsi :-)
Pozdrawiam - i kończę tą jałową dyskusję.