piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
closed by söm4324 (2022-09-22 20:16:22+00:00): Around 130 buildings were marked as destroyed. I removed the tag from all of them as they are still visible on aerial images.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126520342
opened by Cryxtalix (2020-01-18 11:22:23+00:00): Unable to answer "Are there sound signals for the blind here?" for https://osm.org/node/7122226082 via StreetComplete 16.0:

Might be out of order
opened by bharatsony_04 (2020-01-18 11:25:17+00:00): This is not my location
closed by mavl (2020-01-19 04:52:00+00:00): This note does not contain a useful information for OpenStreetMap.
opened by Cryxtalix (2020-01-18 11:28:15+00:00): Unable to answer "Are there sound signals for the blind here?" for https://osm.org/node/7122353665 via StreetComplete 16.0:

Might be out of order
opened by  (2020-01-18 11:32:47+00:00): Trwa budowa kompleksu basenów geotermalnych. https://expressilustrowany.pl/baseny-termalne-poddebice-w-poddebicach-rosnie-kompleks-basenow-geotermalnych-wiemy-co-w-nim-bedzie-zdjecia/ar/c2-14663045
closed by blxght (2022-08-21 20:19:17+00:00): Budowa zakończona.
opened by majidahp (2020-01-18 11:37:28+00:00): آموزشگاه رانندگی ماهان...اهواز
closed by Sosha1996 (2023-08-03 10:33:32+00:00): this note closed by script for due inactivity.
opened by  (2020-01-18 11:38:04+00:00): There isn’t a street on the beach. Wondering if this “roadway” is supposed to indicate that vehicles can be driven on this beach.
closed by floridaeditor (2020-05-19 21:09:56+00:00): Yes, it is, which would technically be a 'road'
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2020-01-18 11:39:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421884771/history#map=19/55.86937/-4.29376&layers=N is "Mill Lead" still used to refer to this area? 

If yes, then it can be mapped as place=locality

If not, then this object can be probably safely deleted.
opened by Eric COULIBALY (2020-01-18 11:40:02+00:00): Toilette public
closed by Syl (2022-11-17 08:13:49+00:00): A été ajouté depuis
opened by Pacho Yuly (2020-01-18 11:49:28+00:00): lavanderia LA PEQUEÑA  YU
opened by RoyalArgus (2020-01-18 11:50:10+00:00): Unable to answer "What type of recycling facility is this?" for https://osm.org/node/1659651153 via StreetComplete 16.0:

Keine Recyclingeinrichtung vorhanden.
closed by jacobbraeutigam (2020-01-18 15:57:23+00:00): Entfernt.

(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79734360)
opened by Saymon Garcia-Picard (2020-01-18 11:55:39+00:00): "j’ai h j’y jet"
The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI name: President's Home
POI types: building
OSM data version: 2019-11-24T01:08:45Z
 #mapsme
opened by korridor (2020-01-18 11:56:34+00:00): "Duplicate of Tian Bistro"
The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI name: Tian Bistro
POI types: amenity-restaurant
OSM data version: 2019-11-24T01:08:45Z
 #mapsme
closed by and_y3 (2020-01-26 23:28:52+00:00): removed duplicate node
opened by  (2020-01-18 11:58:40+00:00): Кофейня "Kava Avenue". Кофе, кофейные напитки, чай.
opened by tyr_asd (2020-01-18 12:05:48+00:00): Duplicate address? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2749772772
closed by Emilius123 (2023-04-21 08:53:16+00:00): Quite obviously, yeah.

I've fixed it, thank you for the report.
opened by  (2020-01-18 12:05:49+00:00): MIlitary Academy „General Mihailo Apostolski“-Skopje
closed by MK 1 (2025-11-01 11:42:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/661009167
opened by Antonius Buxtonius (2020-01-18 12:06:06+00:00): Closed in 2019, currently vacant
closed by GinaroZ (2020-06-17 17:21:08+00:00): removed
opened by Antonius Buxtonius (2020-01-18 12:08:10+00:00): Relocated in 2019 to previous Dorothy Perkins outlet within The Springs. Currently vacant
closed by GinaroZ (2020-06-17 17:21:05+00:00): moved
opened by Tungmar (2020-01-18 12:09:10+00:00): Is there actually a building under park?
closed by indigomc (2020-08-27 18:25:18+00:00): I'm assuming you are looking at old imagery, please reopen otherwise.
opened by Antonius Buxtonius (2020-01-18 12:09:18+00:00): Closed in 2018. Currently vacant
closed by GinaroZ (2020-06-17 17:21:12+00:00): removed
opened by mangelhort (2020-01-18 12:09:34+00:00): Unable to answer "Does this crosswalk have tactile pavings on both sides?" for https://osm.org/node/5699874889 via StreetComplete 16.1:

kein Übergang hier
closed by jacobbraeutigam (2020-01-18 16:04:18+00:00): Entfernt.

(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79734510)
opened by OSM_RogerWilco (2020-01-18 12:10:05+00:00): Neues Einfamilienhaus. Nr. 5

via StreetComplete 16.0
opened by Adamant1 (2020-01-18 12:10:34+00:00): This commercial area could be chopped up and partly turned into retail where the businesses are. Its really only a smaller area a block up from here that includes the bank, post office, and fire department. Also the residential landuse area could be moved west so the houses along Pine Street are included in it. Since houses aren't "commercial."
closed by stevea (2020-04-24 23:19:53+00:00): Yes, it could be, but without better data, it can't be.  Note that the "note" tag on the multipolygon says "All uses permitted in the “C-1" zone plus veterinary clinics (without overnight boarding), offices, indoor theaters, and retail sales involving large areas such as appliance showrooms, automobile supply stores, department stores, and garden supply stores."

So, as this blends both what OSM calls landuse=commercial and landuse=retail into a single datum, only "local on the ground" knowledge would allow this "split" to happen.  And it wouldn't necessarily be contiguous between one and the other, that is, all "professional" (for example) commercial landuse are not in a zone separated from strictly retail landuse (as they are, for example, in Santa Cruz, along Mission Street's "Professional Corridor" distinct from a retail district further west).

Additionally, the buildings (and concomitant zone) along Pine Street (1311 - 13185) ARE zoned commercial, whether or not they are being lived in (exclusively), used commercially (exclusively) or both.

I myself have lived in a residence which is also active commercially as a small business which straddled a residential / commercial-professional zoning boundary (in Santa Cruz).  These do not have a specific tag in OSM (such as landuse=residential_commercial_combined), similar to how there are many landuse=farmland tagged on "Zoning=RA" polygons:  these are "live-on family farms," and there is no specific tag in OSM for this).  These have and do sometimes vacillate between landuse=farmland and landuse=residential (both are correct), though similar to "commercial vs. residential" (here in Boulder Creek), these predominantly "tip towards" being tagged landuse=farmland rather than residential.

Hence, I'm closing this as "no better data are currently known."

Of course, if you visit and provide on-the-ground, parcel-by-parcel data and mapping skills that improve data as you describe, you are welcome to do so.
commented by stevea (2020-04-24 23:24:55+00:00): Reactivated for what reason?
commented by Adamant1 (2020-04-24 23:27:34+00:00): How about not. I'm pretty sure it's already been established that 
official zoning" and OSM landuse tagging are different things. I don't feel like the need to rehash it either. Especially with you. People see "retail" stores/a "retail" area on OSM, they should see retail landuse. A good example is slightly above here with what could technically be residential landuse due to housing above shops, but is rightly IMO tagged as retail, because that's how OSM prefers it. People can look at official city maps to findout officially city landuse. In most places, doing a 1/1 conversation would be extremely worthless though and not help map consumers. Again, I'm not relitigating it. Take it up with the tagging mailing list if you don't think retail landuse should be used for shops.
commented by Adamant1 (2020-04-24 23:28:20+00:00): It's called "use" for a reason.
closed by stevea (2020-04-24 23:33:30+00:00): Stating "you are pretty sure" isn't evidence, it is opinion.

The area is tagged correctly as far as OSM is concerned, although I agree with you that it could be tagged more specifically as to individual parcels being more strictly retail as opposed to more strictly commercial.

However, as commercial does encompass retail (though I agree with you, less specifically), it isn't strictly incorrect.  If you wish to correct it, please correct it with data that are superior.  (Likely from on-the-ground, locally-sourced research).  I mean, I order Chinese take out from Red Pearl fairly frequently (it's really good food) so I could say that the single parcel that surrounds that restaurant could/should be changed from commercial to retail.  But I haven't the patience to do this for every building/business/parcel surrounded by this multipolygon.  If you have the data, knowledge and patience to do so, you are welcome to do so.  But because you don't, doesn't make this a Note to be Resolved as "could be better."  That could be said all over the map and so data entries such as these effectively communicate nothing.

Closing as resolved.
commented by stevea (2020-04-24 23:35:08+00:00): It isn't correct (nor polite) to reactivate a Note without giving a reason for doing so.
commented by Adamant1 (2020-04-24 23:41:58+00:00): Also, whatever your personal preference or local landuse department says, Woodpeck explicitly told us to leave each others notes/edits alone. I have to yet see anywhere it's changed and it should be respected until it. So, it would be great if you followed what he told you. I have better things to deal with then your crap or report you for disobeying the no contact thing yet again. I'm sure you do to. You don't own the map and anyone can open a note for whatever reason they want.  Especially when it's someone you've been told to leave alone repeatedly. So, piss off my notes. Thanks.
commented by Adamant1 (2020-04-24 23:43:07+00:00): I'm going through this 2 months just because you like getting into it again.
commented by stevea (2020-04-24 23:43:28+00:00): Yes, but as you did this three months ago, it was you who "cast the first stone" against Frederik's admonishment.  And being potty-mouthed leaves you in the gutter, while I remain on the high road.
commented by stevea (2020-04-24 23:44:35+00:00): Adam, I actually LOATHE "getting into it again" with you.  But this Note simply doesn't belong int the map.
commented by Adamant1 (2020-04-24 23:52:29+00:00): Wrong. He said not to edit or comment on your stuff and this is neither an edit of anything you mapped or a comment on a note you opened. Plus, It's not in Santa Cruz anyway. The thing didn't apply to the whole damn bay area dude. Get real. Again though, even if it did, it's not an edit. Nor did I contact you by opening it. 

The high road would have been to leave me alone and that's what you would do if you loathe this so much. People who loathe people don't contact them or otherwise screw with their stuff. I know you love to act like your always above it all and the poor victim when your the instigator though. If the not doesn't belong, someone else can resolve it then. I don't really care. Your not going to be the one to do it though. I'm fine reporting you to Woodpeck again. I'm sure he's as tired of this as me and everyone else is.
commented by stevea (2020-04-24 23:58:02+00:00): I've already contacted him to take a look at your behavior.

I am real.  Nothing about my behavior isn't.

I don't loathe people (please don't put words in my mouth), I loathe interaction with overtly abrasive people.

And yes, relation/9482117 was created by me.  So your comments on it were effectively an attack on stevea data (a weak one, as all you say about it is "it could be better").  If the data could be better, improve them.  But don't leave a Note open perpetually without doing anything about it for months, especially when the entry is after you have been asked to stay away from data I have entered (which I think both of us believe is a good idea for each of us to do with regards to one another).
commented by Adamant1 (2020-04-25 00:11:01+00:00): Good. I didn't check who did the relation, because I have better things to do and it's not where you live. That said, the relation over rid mapping I had originally done there anyway. So....You reverted what I mapped and that's OK, but then I can't comment that something can be mapped 

Also, there's a ton of notes all over here that have been open for years that your doing nothing about. So, it seems more like your targeting me then having an actual concern for notes sitting around for a while when they can be dealt with. You did the same thing last time where you resolved all notes with snide comments and claimed it was due to how long they had been there, but never resolved notes right next to them that had been there for years. You can't have it both ways. Go resolve some other notes if your so concerned about it. Otherwise, your obfuscating and it's just harassment. 

I'm done with until l Woodpeck get's involved. You should be to.
commented by Adamant1 (2020-04-25 00:11:35+00:00): Mapped better"
commented by stevea (2020-04-25 00:14:41+00:00): Yeah, it is where I live:  I just said I order food from Red Pearl.

And when in Santa Cruz County, when you are explicitly told to be very careful mapping here (if at all), you should (but didn't) take extra precautions on checking the history / authorship tags on (multi)polygons you complain about in Notes.

BTW, earlier today, I DID resolve some additional notes (at UCSC, my alma mater, and elsewhere in the county).  So, your snarky comments about "it seems" are hereby proven false.  I'm neither obfuscating (I'm clear as a bell) and I'm not harassing, merely following good OSM practice.  Are you?
commented by Adamant1 (2020-04-25 00:29:25+00:00): Last I checked you live in Santa Cruz, or you just live everywhere in the bay area where I map and leave notes sometimes? It's 16 miles and a 30 minute drive from Santa Cruz. By your logic I should be banned from doing anything in San Jose because you take weekend trips though. Seriously dude. I've already told you I have family in this area and travel through there sometimes. Even in Santa Cruz. But I've still left that specific area alone. I've been plenty careful mapping where you live, I'm not going to be plenty careful mapping everywhere just because you might throw a fit about it. 

I wasn't aware you mapped the multipolygon either until just now because originally I had been look at the map on/ OsmAnd, saw how I mapped it changed, figured some random person that didn't know what retail landuse was had changed it, and left the note. There was zero reason to think you had anything to do with it considering you where told to stay away from my edits. You can't see changeset histories in OsmAnd anyway. 

Good. You resolved some notes. Last time I checked its good practice to open notes when you see something mapped wrong so it can be fixed. I know you have your own ways of doing this though that doesn't usually follow OSM practices, but that's not on me. 

I'm definitely done now.
commented by stevea (2020-04-25 00:35:20+00:00): Nobody is "throwing fits," this is simply hyperbole on your part.

You've never driven a while to really good Chinese take-out?  I have — wow, you're missing out.  (And it's not that far from where I live, exactly where, you don't actually know).

If you can't see changeset histories in OsmAnd and you've been told not to map (or leave Notes, or have activity that would overlap with my edits...) in Santa Cruz County, then don't use OsmAnd, use a tool (there are plenty) that does tell you.  You using the wrong tool to figure something out you've been scolded to figure out isn't my error or the map's error, it's your error.

I don't have "my own way" of resolving Notes, I use the OSM way, the proper way.  In this case, because of our histories, you didn't.  That IS on you.

I sincerely doubt you are "done," but we'll see.
commented by stevea (2020-04-25 01:35:57+00:00): I have added fixme=Stated in Note 2060959 to be (paraphrasing) "too commercial and not enough retail.". So, correct by specific "break-out" of this into more polygons, some landuse=retail, some landuse=commercial. OSM hasn't actual "mixed-use."

Perhaps the original poster can consider this Resolved.
commented by stevea (2020-04-25 02:34:06+00:00): I have also expanded the retail area added for American Gas to include New Leaf, Red Pearl and the bottle shop.  The jeweler next door is retail, too, but this might share a building or properly line (not sure without more research, so give up easy) with the (professional, commercial, not retail) real estate office next door.

Perhaps the original poster can consider this Resolved.
commented by stevea (2020-04-25 02:36:46+00:00): Paths forward include expanding this retail polygon and/or (likely and) adding additional polygons which are in the greater landuse=commercial multipolygon's outer-roled circumscription.  (Careful with that word, I merely mean what is surrounded" by "a widest-area outer polygon" which admittedly can't always be found but in this case, (only one member tagged outer) can.
commented by stevea (2020-04-25 03:19:09+00:00): Simplified by eliminating the multipolygon and freehand drawing the retail.

Perhaps the original poster can consider this Resolved.
commented by stevea (2020-04-25 03:49:35+00:00): Better?  Perhaps the original poster can consider this Resolved.
closed by Adamant1 (2020-04-25 08:05:46+00:00): Yeah, that's better. I'll accept it for now. You left out Alice's Collectibles, but nothing is perfect. I appreciate the compromise.
opened by babis812 (2020-01-18 12:14:15+00:00): "Здесь пивная"
The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI name: Баррель
POI types: shop-alcohol wheelchair-no
OSM data version: 2019-11-24T01:08:45Z
 #mapsme
opened by babis812 (2020-01-18 12:14:15+00:00): "Семья закрылась"
The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI name: Народная 7Я семьЯ
POI types: shop-supermarket
OSM data version: 2019-11-24T01:08:45Z
 #mapsme
closed by Alexandrcfif (2020-02-19 21:11:37+00:00): уже удалили
opened by Adamant1 (2020-01-18 12:14:19+00:00): This is a residential area. Not commercial.
closed by stevea (2020-04-24 23:20:45+00:00): These parcels are zoned commercial.  I have no idea from where the poster determined that "this is a residential area."
closed by Adamant1 (2020-04-25 08:12:00+00:00): By the houses. It's called looking at the map. landuse=residential "An area of land dedicated to, or having predominantly residential buildings such as houses or apartment buildings."

I know you don't go by the accepted wiki definition, but that doesn't mean someone who is seeing things. Just saying. That said, I'll call this one good for now at least since you where willing to meet me half way on the other note. One evening of this is more then enough. I have zero urge to extend it another day. Not that I might not open a similar note in the future though if it's never corrected, but for now, I'm good with it.
closed by stevea (2020-04-25 08:13:30+00:00): I DO "go by the accepted wiki definitions."  You accusing me otherwise is more slanderous lies.
commented by stevea (2020-04-25 08:15:55+00:00): Now, why would you reactivate a Note you personally just Resolved?
closed by Adamant1 (2020-04-25 08:17:57+00:00): Well, for the sake of civility I will give that you do when it suites you. How about that? We all have our own preferences. Mine don't come out in the ways yours do, I'm more fundamentalist with landuse because it's just easier, but I'm not judging you for the ways you stretch it. Lets leave it at that though. I rather end things on a more neutral tone.
closed by stevea (2020-04-25 08:19:37+00:00): Your substantial buildings and solar panels contributions in and around Boulder Creek prompted me to add your name and mention of your contributions to the County wiki page.
closed by Adamant1 (2020-04-27 23:34:51+00:00): Thanks for doing that. It's nice to be mentioned somewhere for my contributions.
closed by stevea (2020-04-27 23:42:17+00:00): As Minh, Frederik and others have mentioned, we both make positive contributions to the map.  "Some" confluence of circumstances (I don't think either of us can say exactly what) seems to have thrown a huge roadblock in the way of us doing that together in places where our mapping overlap.  I deliberately put that in the past tense, as I'd very much like to put that behind us.  And simply stated, "good work that deserves recognition is good work that deserves recognition."

So, you are welcome, and I look forward to more positive interactions between us in the future.  Let's be careful, let's be respectful, let's both continue to make positive contributions to the map, being aware that each of us has toes that can be stepped on (true of anybody, really).  Happy mapping.
opened by  (2020-01-18 12:14:19+00:00): Paseó (This note has been created from Geovelo : http://amenagements-cyclables.fr/fr/contributions/11937)
opened by Алексей Силенок (2020-01-18 12:16:15+00:00): "Платформа называется Покровское, а не «Покровская»"
POI name: Покровская
POI types: railway-halt
OSM data version: 2019-11-24T01:08:45Z
 #mapsme
closed by literan (2020-01-18 14:04:55+00:00): исправил
opened by mohammadabbasi (2020-01-18 12:19:29+00:00): هیئت بنت الرسول
closed by Sosha1996 (2023-08-07 21:19:09+00:00): this note closed by script for due inactivity.
opened by Mattéo Delabre (2020-01-18 12:20:53+00:00): Nouvelle entrée Jeanbrau construite en 2018 à double sens pour véhicules détenteurs de badges d’accès et pour piétons
closed by dmar@ (2021-08-05 10:30:09+00:00): Badge d'accès obligatoire pour les véhicules motorisés, interdiction pour les piétons qui sont redirigés vers l'entrée dédiée au Nord Est
opened by  (2020-01-18 12:21:10+00:00): House number duplication, 48 and 50 are yards south of this block.
closed by Dave Venables (2020-01-18 14:06:35+00:00): Updated https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476180658
opened by Mattéo Delabre (2020-01-18 12:21:48+00:00): Converti en accès vélos et piétons exclusivement suite à construction accès Jeanbrau face à bâtiment 16
closed by dmar@ (2021-08-05 10:28:17+00:00): modifié
opened by Skinine (2020-01-18 12:22:27+00:00): "Rua Três Marias"
POI has no name
POI types: psurface-unpaved_bad hwtag-private highway-residential
OSM data version: 2019-11-24T01:08:45Z
 #mapsme
closed by Skinine (2020-02-04 23:18:34+00:00): Feito!
opened by ワインパン (2020-01-18 12:23:49+00:00): WINE ROOM PIN(パン)
opened by Bastien Nail (2020-01-18 12:24:40+00:00): Bonjour,
J'aimerais localiser la Patinoire des Jardins du Trocadéro, qui se trouve devant l'aquarium de Paris, sur son esplanade. Serait-ce possible ? Également, j'aimerais corriger l'erreur sur Instagram, qui localise la patinoire au 5 avenue Albert de Mun, mais qui géolocalise a 60km....
Merci beaucoup par avance :)
closed by Syl (2020-01-21 23:45:13+00:00): Note en double
opened by Bastien Nail (2020-01-18 12:25:44+00:00): Bonjour,
J'aimerais localiser la Patinoire des Jardins du Trocadéro, qui se trouve devant l'aquarium de Paris, sur son esplanade. Serait-ce possible ? Également, j'aimerais corriger l'erreur sur Instagram, qui localise la patinoire au 5 avenue Albert de Mun, mais qui géolocalise a 60km....
Merci beaucoup par avance :)
closed by Truchin (2020-03-31 12:54:19+00:00): Ça sera à mettre en place l'hiver prochain si elle revient au même endroit