piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
closed by mweper (2019-04-15 14:34:54+00:00): El mapa es público para todos, por favor, usa las notas adecuadamente. Las mismas son para informar de datos erróneos o inexistentes en el mapa, no para generar publicidad, comentarios generales, notas personales, hechos históricos o temporales. Véase el uso adecuado de las notas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Notes
-- 
Para crear mapas personalizados, puedes usar la herramienta en línea http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
opened by  (2019-04-15 08:35:53+00:00): Hier befindet sich Hausnr. 9. Das Grundstück wurde inzwischen bebaut.
opened by glitzerfritten (2019-04-15 08:37:14+00:00): Hier befindet sich der Komplex - Infoladen Trier

via StreetComplete 11.0
opened by  (2019-04-15 08:37:59+00:00): kicks eller ET er ikke her lenge og blir nå Big bite
closed by FredrikLindseth (2019-05-26 20:55:30+00:00): fixed
opened by mohasr1967 (2019-04-15 08:41:08+00:00): محطة كهرباء عصيفرة ـ تعز
opened by Lawlinux (2019-04-15 08:43:27+00:00): Unable to answer "What is the speed limit for Am Frauenmarkt here?" for https://osm.org/way/22811246 via StreetComplete 11.0:

Hier gelten mehrere Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungen. Einmal 50 und dann aufgrund einer Engstelle 30Km/h
commented by user_2066394 (2020-10-06 21:16:39+00:00): Die Engstelle ist auf Höhe des Markers?
closed by user_2066394 (2020-10-07 14:10:22+00:00): bearbeitet
opened by glitzerfritten (2019-04-15 08:46:01+00:00): Befindet sich hier ein Sportplatz?

via StreetComplete 11.0
commented by Erdrandbewohner (2019-04-16 20:25:49+00:00): Ja, ein umzäunter Bolzplatz.
closed by Erdrandbewohner (2019-04-22 13:33:47+00:00): Auf Erledigt gesetzt
opened by  (2019-04-15 08:46:26+00:00): Mehrfamilienhaus
commented by  (2019-04-15 08:46:29+00:00): Mehrfamilienhaus
commented by highflyer74 (2019-05-08 18:53:22+00:00): Hier sind zwei Gebäude mit den Hausnummern 171 + 173 erfasst. Was ist verkehrt oder fehlt? "Mehrfamilienhaus" hilft uns hier nicht weiter...
commented by bison166 (2019-05-29 15:22:41+00:00): ich habe das mal als building=apartments umbenannt.
commented by highflyer74 (2019-05-29 15:23:58+00:00): Alles klar! Dann mach' die Note ruhig zu, hier meldet sich ja niemand mehr. Viele Grüße!
opened by tordans (2019-04-15 08:47:20+00:00): The inner ways are not connected. But there should be a building passage at this position. Please check and add.
commented by Riccardo Stagni (2019-06-19 10:02:46+00:00): Nope: there is an access gate on the outer wall, going against the inner wall

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/3822.jpg
closed by Riccardo Stagni (2019-06-22 16:35:45+00:00): added noexit
opened by พานิชย์_ผดุงเจริญ_ (2019-04-15 08:53:11+00:00): "ตาเกาว์ใหม่พัฒนา,"
POI has no name
POI types: man_made-water_tower
OSM data version: 2019-03-28T14:13:02Z
 #mapsme
closed by andi9876 (2019-04-22 17:20:28+00:00): ok
opened by พานิชย์_ผดุงเจริญ_ (2019-04-15 08:53:17+00:00): "โนนกรวย,"
POI has no name
POI types: man_made-water_tower
OSM data version: 2019-03-28T14:13:02Z
 #mapsme
closed by andi9876 (2019-04-22 17:19:16+00:00): ok
opened by Swannyee (2019-04-15 08:55:48+00:00): "CP five star chicken fried"
POI has no name
POI types: highway-residential
OSM data version: 2019-03-28T14:13:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by Amigo (2019-04-15 08:57:46+00:00): Vеликий
http://9888887.ru/
вход тут с пандусом
вместо круассана
opened by Matthieu Weber (2019-04-15 08:58:44+00:00): pont déplacé
commented by lunaticstraydog (2022-10-15 09:22:01+00:00): Déplacé selon la bd topo,voir si cela correspond à la réalité
closed by GeorgeKaplan (2024-01-03 15:24:32+00:00): Pas de retour, je ferme.
opened by Matthieu Weber (2019-04-15 08:58:59+00:00): chemin supprimé
closed by David Crochet (2019-04-18 09:11:20+00:00): ok
opened by jalaltorfi (2019-04-15 08:59:05+00:00): "بیت"
POI name: سه
POI types: highway-residential
OSM data version: 2019-03-28T14:13:02Z
 #mapsme
closed by Sosha1996 (2023-08-03 08:43:40+00:00): this note closed by script for due inactivity.
opened by  (2019-04-15 09:00:13+00:00): Eintrag auf https://radwege.greenpeace.de/: "Fahrbahnbelag gefährlich uneben, kaum benutzbar." - tracktype:grade1 bitte überprüfen.
commented by intschutschuna (2019-06-29 19:55:29+00:00): tracktype beschreibt die Tragfähigkeit des Weges. Gesucht ist hier smoothness und/oder surface.
closed by intschutschuna (2019-07-07 20:09:44+00:00): "kaum benutzbar" ist ein kleines bisschen übertrieben. smoothness hinzugefügt.
opened by moosfrosch (2019-04-15 09:00:47+00:00): von hier keine Wegverbindung zu den Waldwegen wenige Meter weiter?
commented by Hiddenhausener (2020-12-21 13:13:06+00:00): Falls der Pfad im Wald existiert. Im Luftbild nicht. Die Pfade im Wald sind auch fragwürdig. Wenn mann im Luftbild Fahrspuren erkennt, wäre dann nicht Feldweg richtig?
commented by moosfrosch (2020-12-21 13:59:36+00:00): Du hast natürlich recht. Deshalb wunderte ich mich ja - überlicherweise gibt es nahe der Siedlungen immer Wege und Trampelpfade von Gassigehern usw. Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass es auf der einen Seite im Wald und auf der anderen Seite Feld/Siedlung Wege mit Sackgassen gibt, die nur wenige dutzend Meter entfernt sind und nicht irgendwie verbunden sind. Aber das müsste wohl jemand vor Ort mappen. War mir beim Weg vom Hermannsweg zum Bf. Hilter aufgefallen, dass das Routing außenherum geht; wollte aber keine Experimente starten um die Bahn nicht zu verpassen...
commented by chris66 (2026-02-01 09:17:44+00:00): Ist hier noch was zu tun ?

LG.
opened by ForstEK (2019-04-15 09:04:20+00:00): need continue stream
closed by ForstEK (2020-08-24 18:33:26+00:00): отмечено
opened by  (2019-04-15 09:06:20+00:00): There is a road connection between the roundabout and shopping centre.
closed by Fizzie-DWG (2022-02-03 06:00:58+00:00): Added
opened by ABDULLAH AL WERFALLI (2019-04-15 09:09:20+00:00): The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI name: كلية اعداد المعلمين-College of Teachers
POI types: amenity-school
OSM data version: 2019-03-28T14:13:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by ABDULLAH AL WERFALLI (2019-04-15 09:09:22+00:00): The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI name: محطة وقود
POI types: amenity-fuel
OSM data version: 2019-03-28T14:13:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by ABDULLAH AL WERFALLI (2019-04-15 09:09:23+00:00): The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI name: مدرسة الفاروق
POI types: amenity-school
OSM data version: 2019-03-28T14:13:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by ABDULLAH AL WERFALLI (2019-04-15 09:09:24+00:00): The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI name: المركز الليبي الاوركراني لطب العيون
POI types: amenity-clinic
OSM data version: 2019-03-28T14:13:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by magrej (2019-04-15 09:09:58+00:00): Please check the correct name for this way.
closed by asdgasa (2019-05-01 16:52:55+00:00): corrected feature type to driveway
opened by mete32 (2019-04-15 09:10:35+00:00): Gün Işığı
opened by mete32 (2019-04-15 09:10:55+00:00): City Court
opened by  (2019-04-15 09:10:55+00:00): Wonderboom Junction
closed by Johan Heyns (2022-11-18 06:39:21+00:00): Wonderboom Junction
opened by 徐勇嘻嘻嘻嘻嘻嘻 (2019-04-15 09:12:31+00:00): xxxxx
closed by mavl (2019-04-16 17:01:09+00:00): This note does not contain a useful information for OpenStreetMap.
opened by idelac (2019-04-15 09:13:26+00:00): Novi semafor se postavlja upravo.
opened by mete32 (2019-04-15 09:14:18+00:00): Karakol
opened by  (2019-04-15 09:15:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1128854959 - is it really playground?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2019-04-15 09:15:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1128854959 - is it really playground?
closed by stevea (2019-04-15 17:54:45+00:00): Our wiki defines playground as "marks a children's playground. These are outdoor areas for children to play."  With its additional tags, yes, I do believe it is an accurately-tagged playground for children to surf.
commented by Adamant1 (2019-04-16 00:05:16+00:00): Stevea, how exactly is you answering the question and then resolving the note reaching consensus about something? Maybe someone, including Mateusz Konieczny disagree with you and would like to comment on what you say before the note is closed. I'm pretty sure Mateusz Konieczny knew what the Wiki definition of a playground was before he decided to open the note. 

Its hilarious to that your perfectly willing to go with the wiki definition here, but then you disregard the definition of parks on the wiki as "intended for urban parks with managed greenery" and "in semi-natural state with grassy areas, trees and bushes." So which one is it? Does the wiki definition determine how to tag things or is being to "black and white" and "rigid" to go by the wiki's definition? You can't have it both ways or only go by it just when it serves you. 

Semi related, but only sort of, do you have a source anywhere that says this just a "child's surfing teaching area"? Because I looked it up and couldn't find anything. There wasn't anything that came up called "Cowell's Beach Surfing" and I suspect it goes against the naming rule anyway of not naming things based on their status or object category.
commented by  (2019-04-16 01:18:24+00:00): You are Mateusz are welcome to change the definition of playground on our wiki.

I don't know which park you refer to; this is not a park.  Perhaps if you specifically address a park, I'll have better context.

I live here.  I surf here.  It is as I say.  You might not like the tagging, if so, tell me more about why not or develop a convincing dialog about what tags should change to what and why.
commented by stevea (2019-04-16 01:19:22+00:00): Looks like I wasn't logged in when I clicked Comment.  Now I am and the previous Comment was from stevea.
commented by stevea (2019-04-16 02:35:53+00:00): Should have said "You OR Mateusz"
commented by Adamant1 (2019-04-16 03:14:48+00:00): First, the definition on the wiki is fine. It's your definition that's issue. Although the meaning of a playground isn't implicitly stated in the wiki it shouldn't have to be because there is an implied to the word "playground" that is obvious. The purpose of the wiki is to define tagging, not be a dictionary for the description of terms that have widely accepted meanings. In this case, its pretty widely accepted that a playground is something on the ground, where kids play, that has equipment for it. Which this clearly doesn't fit. I could pretty easily get into a semantic argument with you about the meaning of "ground" (which water isn't) and "play" (which surfing is questionably playing) but I won't. I think the meaning of the word for the tag is more important to what the particulars of the wiki says at any one time though and in this case, its more about what the wiki doesn't say then what it does. 

Again, I'll state what I did before just because kids use it doesn't mean its a playground. Anymore then the specific spot on the rock climbing wall at my local gym is a playground or any other things that are accessed by children. Again, it's an access thing, not something that determines tagging. Also, some playgrounds are accessed by adults. So if you use your logic of this being a playground and a surfing area, then all surfing areas are potentially also playground. Which is clearly none sense and negates the purpose of the tags. 

I've already stated which parks plenty of times, the beaches that you wrongly think are parks. There's plenty of examples around here. 

As far as you living there, 1. Your subjective experience doesn't determine how things are tagged. Anymore then I can tag my house as a castle just because I live here and feel like it. 2. There's an implied verifiability to things mapped in OSM. If I do map my house as castle and then another mapper comes along and wants evidence that its actually a castle, I can't just say
commented by Adamant1 (2019-04-16 03:19:33+00:00): "its my house. If you don't like it to bad." Its on me to provide evidence as to my house is actually a castle. From the wiki "a tag/value combination is verifiable if and only if independent users when observing the same feature would make the same observation every time."
Also, "do not tag individual subjective or hypothetical opinions, reviews or evaluations of objects." Notice it says there to not tag subjectively. 

3. saying your personal opinion is the only the one that matters and that we should just change the wiki if we don't like it isn't consensus or listening, which is the thing you endlessly complain about. Practice what you preach.

As far as alternative to how it's currently tagged, I already posed a different way to tag it on the wiki. Just as a normal surfing area, minus the playground tag, with access=children or something. That sounds perfectly reasonable to me. Again, it's not a playground.
commented by Adamant1 (2019-04-16 03:21:38+00:00): But if it is a surfing area exclusively for children it needs to be backed up with a source or something and not just "because I say so." Otherwise, it might dissuade adults from surfing there also if they are looking for surfing spots when they have every right to.
commented by stevea (2019-04-16 03:27:25+00:00): And yet, we agree to disagree.  You state it's "obvious" that "it's pretty widely accepted."  Simply stop.  Stop right there.  I smell weasel words and sloppy logic.

"A playground, on the ground, where kids play" being obvious, is one thing.  It is a thing.  It is even an easy thing.  Yet, there is the concept of a playground, which it seems obvious to ME does not include the children's section of a bookstore (I know several).  What is the "sport" there?

Your exposition on the boundaries between water/water and play are excellent.  Let's see more of that, please.

Kids and playgrounds go together in most people's minds, let's explore that further.

Which beaches do I think are "wrongly" parks?

My subjective experience becoming my objective experience becoming OSM tagging is precisely the point.  Stand me up and meet me here with your laptop or smart phone and we'll tag more accurately together.

Maybe we do better in changesets than wiki.  I'm not sure yet, however, I continue to reach out to the better part of whomever I'm dialoging with.

Tag it a surfing area.  I'm not sure what the (shill or otherwise) account meant to do out in Capitola with all the surfing areas recently however I'm watching.
commented by stevea (2019-04-16 03:28:21+00:00): Adults who are looking for a place to surf are virtually ACTIVELY DISCOURAGED from surfing here.  Hey, it's a "playground for children surfing."  Ipso facto.
commented by stevea (2019-04-16 03:30:48+00:00): Ground/water, not water/water.
commented by stevea (2019-04-16 03:32:16+00:00): In short, what I call a "playground" (in OSM, around here) can include 51 meters into the Pacific Ocean, at a particular place on a beach in Santa Cruz, because the Junior Lifeguards of the city are here, as required.  I live here, dude.
commented by Adamant1 (2019-04-16 08:42:04+00:00): I'm not going to argue about the playground thing right now. I'd like to hear more from Mateusz Konieczny about his opinion on it and see if anyone else comments. But in the meantime can you provide a link to the park/beach/whatever changeset that your accusing me of doing? Unfortunately I don't have this area on my changeset watch list.
commented by  (2019-04-16 09:10:47+00:00): Also, what exactly was the change?
commented by Adamant1 (2019-04-26 02:02:51+00:00): Well, I guess that turned out to be another false accusation. "shrug."
commented by Adamant1 (2019-04-26 02:04:03+00:00): Btw, I plan to get back to this later when I have the time. So don't think it's dealt with.
commented by stevea (2019-04-26 02:11:15+00:00): I do think it is dealt with.  If you want to deal with it, deal with it.  I consider it resolved.  If you don't consider it resolved, resolve it already.  But don't leave it unresolved, promise to get to it and never resolve it.  Which is what you do.  Talk, talk, talk, never has time to map.

Grow a pair, Adamant1:  map.
commented by Adamant1 (2019-04-26 08:39:08+00:00): "Grow a pair, Adamant1: map."

Kind of hard to map when there's someone like you around that says if I do it will be vandalism that you will report me for. If you want to rescind the statement though, I'm perfectly willing to do some mapping. Your the one that acted like I needed permission to do things. I'll just go ahead and map though. Just don't revert me or complain about vandalism.
commented by Adamant1 (2019-04-26 08:53:47+00:00): "Which is what you do. Talk, talk, talk"

But I thought I had to consult the local community and get consensus and read obscure irrelevant wiki pages and discuss everything and blah blah blah...I mean, your the one that said multiple times in almost every paragraph you had a chance to that I should do those things. Then when I said I didn't think it was necessary or double to consult people and ask permission to do every edit, you accused me of being an arrogant troll. So gosh, I mean, really, where do actually stand on anything? On minute I'm a troll etc etc if I want to edit something without asking you first. Then the next I need to stop talking and grow a pair. Gee wiz, you sure move the goal post a lot. So Should I shout up and map or should you be consulted on everything? Which one is it?
commented by stevea (2019-04-26 19:43:07+00:00): Map well.  Discuss (concisely, I say that, but I am called loquacious, I'll nod my head to that sometimes) only when and as much as is necessary.  There is a sweet spot, yet for whatever reasons, you and I go way too far and I find it exhausting.  Hence, me saying "map this better if you think it needs to be better; I don't, but let's see what you've got."

Please don't let the fear of a mistake, especially a minor one, prevent you from mapping well.  Discussing first is polite and largely correct, though disagreements do occur; this seems to be one between us.  Of course, it's imperative to have solid knowledge of how tags are and should be used (this can be difficult sometimes, especially with "park" and its histories and how landuse/landcover issues have been confused in many minds, and for other reasons I've noted).

And please don't indict me for what you predict my behavior will be when I haven't done it.

Do you feel "damned if you do or don't?"  Yes, OSM can be that way sometimes, especially over contentious issues.  If/as we strip away misunderstandings (if any) we usually come closer to agreement.  Not always, but the right thing to do is give it our best shot.  With you and me, it seems to take thousands of words.  So, let's try fewer words and more (correct, smart, agreed-upon-semantics) mapping.
commented by Adamant1 (2019-04-27 01:53:08+00:00): Yes, all true and well stated. I think we are making progress. At least it's something. I appreciate your willingness to compromise and say positive things when you might not want to. Not that I'm saying you don't, but I know hurt feelings take time to heal and its good we can be civil with each other in the meantime. Despite the disagreements.
commented by stevea (2019-04-27 02:06:55+00:00): No hurt feelings here.  More like me avoiding the same behavior I've seen in dark people (as in "dark tetrad," or "psychotic").  It isn't that you frighten me, it's more like I don't want to have anything to do with you by continuing go-nowhere discussions.  So to be clear:  I won't let you hurt my feelings, even though I have let you waste my time.

Map.  Map well.  There is much more to that than endless words and rancor.
commented by stevea (2019-04-27 02:09:05+00:00): Psychopathic (or sociopathic), not psychotic.  Two different things.
commented by  (2019-04-27 06:18:24+00:00): So much projection, So little self reflection. I'm starting to think you got all this stuff about psychiatric disorder from seasons with your psychiatrist. Remember, your the one that initiated this. More then likely you originally thought that if you just bullied me around that I'd piss off. That obviously didn't happen though. So, feel free to crawl back under the rock you came out from under when you decided to cause this mess.. I could care less. I'll resolve these notes, make the changes I want, and go about my marry way. That's all I wanted to do in the first place. You and your holier-than-thou know it all attitude is the only thing that got in the way. So, feel free to piss off with it. I could care less. OSM would be better for it. No more fake path's would be great. Don't get involved in my edits or questions on the wiki anymore. DO IT!! I DARE YOU!! Ten bucks says you don't have the guts to just piss off by leaving me and my edits alone like you should have done in the first place.
closed by Adamant1 (2019-04-27 06:33:23+00:00): Fixed.
commented by Adamant1 (2019-04-30 10:04:04+00:00): Re-opening as it got reverted and the issue hasn't been settled. Two people think it shouldn't be a playground and one does. Unfortunately, the one that does seems to be suffering from a bad case of "Wikipedia:Ownership of articles." So keeping open until there's more opinions.
commented by stevea (2019-04-30 16:59:31+00:00): It wasn't "reverted" it was resolved because you "better tagged" it (adding access=children, which I'd never seen and isn't documented, but taginfo says has 33 worldwide OSM occurrences, so, I suppose you're not the only one adding a creative tag that others have used as well).

So, I can say "hm, creative tagging, I'm OK with adding a tag I've never seen and isn't documented," but you can't?  This tagging meets the definition of leisure=playground (which seems to be your objection).  Elsewhere (I believe in the leisure=park/Talk wiki), you've called this "stretching the definition a little" (but not incorrect.  And the only other person (Mateusz, who suggested this note be here) called your argument "absurd."  So really, YOU settled this!  If you want Mateusz to comment here, you are welcome to ask him to do so.  I'll hold off Resolving this to give you a chance to do that, but otherwise, many have considered this to be tagged according to definition for years:  including you for two weeks!

It seems you are only reactivating this to annoy, not get "more opinions."
closed by Adamant1 (2019-04-30 23:08:39+00:00): Hhhmm, I didn't see Mateusz's comment, or I might have thought it was in reference to something else. Things get hard to parse through sometimes. Like the whole discussion you guys had about how to edit the park article page that I completely missed despite checking the change history etc multiple times. I had originally wanted a tad more details from Mateusz, but I'll take your word on it that he thinks it's absurd and just resolve it instead. At least it has the access tag in the meantime. I think it's worth revisiting at a later point though, maybe on the playground article page. As I've actually seen similar things come up before. Like to tag water play areas in parks. Are they  playgrounds or water parks? I'm not invested either way, but I find it an interesting question and people have asked). Only time and discussions will tell though I guess.
opened by sim6 (2019-04-15 09:16:04+00:00): no gr
closed by Xevi (2021-10-29 08:56:00+00:00): Aquest cami no te GR
opened by  (2019-04-15 09:16:38+00:00): Die korrekte Adresse ist "Rainer-Maria-Rilke-Str. 10". Das nächste Haus in Richtung SSW (10m) hat die Adresse "Rathstannenweg 1a".
Die korrekten Adressen sind auch im Online-Kataster von Weimar einsehbar: https://stadtplan.weimar.de/portalserver/#/portal/weimar
closed by OMME-OSM (2019-04-18 12:58:05+00:00): Erledigt - BUG geschlossen
opened by  (2019-04-15 09:17:10+00:00): tricos idomas SL