piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
closed by Diego Krein (2021-11-24 23:42:09+00:00): Gracias por colaborar con OpenStreetMap.

Se agrega nombre de calle.

Puede que le interese hacer todas las correcciones Usted mismo, ya que es de la zona o conoce el lugar. Es relativamente simple, primero deben ingresar a www.openstreetmap.org, y luego al botón editar ubicado arriba y elegir iD, luego deben seguir el tutorial que les explicará como editar.

Les dejo una guía sencilla de como funciona Openstreetmap: https://learnosm.org/es/
Les recomiendo entrar a este grupo/canal/chat del mensajero Telegram donde podrán charlar con otros colaboradores voluntarios de Openstreetmap y sacarse todas las dudas: https://t.me/osm_ar.

Si quieres ponerte en contacto con la comunidad argentina, puedes seguir este enlace https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=-28.24538&mlon=-58.70448#map=17/-28.24538/-58.70448
opened by "АО"Казахтелеком (2019-04-15 12:55:01+00:00): "ул.Салауат 27"
POI has no name
POI types: building
OSM data version: 2019-03-14T00:11:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by "АО"Казахтелеком (2019-04-15 12:55:01+00:00): "ул.Салауат 25"
POI has no name
POI types: building
OSM data version: 2019-03-14T00:11:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by "АО"Казахтелеком (2019-04-15 12:55:02+00:00): "ул.Салауат 18"
POI has no name
POI types: building
OSM data version: 2019-03-14T00:11:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by "АО"Казахтелеком (2019-04-15 12:55:02+00:00): "улица Салауат 16"
POI has no name
POI types: building
OSM data version: 2019-03-14T00:11:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by takje (2019-04-15 12:55:16+00:00): Opening hours: mo-sa: 9h30-18h00; su: 12h-16h
closed by confusedbuffalo (2026-07-17 13:03:34+00:00): Updated from website, thanks
opened by  (2019-04-15 12:57:35+00:00): The tertiary road should end where the block is and not connect (as a tertiary road) to the main road leading to the border crossing. 
Currently it is very misleading.
commented by aceman444 (2019-11-02 19:01:08+00:00): The block is part of the road and thus should block vehicles from passing (being routed through). There are also explicit access pemissings tagged, like motor_vehicle=no, foot=yes. So this seems OK in the OSM way. But you can disconnect the road if you wish (but then make a small connecting footway so that pedestrians can pass).
commented by fkv (2019-11-03 13:39:18+00:00): By convention, niederösterreichische Landesstraßen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AT/Nieder%C3%B6sterreich/Landesstra%C3%9Fen) are tagged as primary. Don't fiddle with that. However, access tags are questionable here. According to current tagging, the road doesn't have any access restriction while the block has. It's usually the other way around. I've never seen a block with signs for foot=yes, bicycle=yes, vehicle=no and motor_vehicle=no on it. Don't forget that access tags are about permissions, not possibility! When there's no sign on it => no access tags! Use width=* or maxwidth:physical=* to specify the width of the block and/or the remaining width of the road.
commented by fkv (2019-11-03 13:40:48+00:00): s/primary/tertiary at least/
commented by aceman444 (2019-11-03 14:33:03+00:00): On barriers, it seems the access tags are about possibility (accessibility), not legal permissions, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Barriers#Routing . I've seen this common to place access tags on the barrier and not on the road, because those may differ (of course, if there is a traffic sign, the access tags have to be pu on the road and also on the barrier). Surely there are no traffic signs on that road L2239 (you can use a car to drive it up to the block), but there is the block placed to physically disallow access by motor_vehicles from the north side. I see no problem in this, and it will work in routing applications. So I see no problem in this tagging as it is. But I'm not the author of it and you can do whatever is common in Austria, I'd like to see how you propose to change it. Thanks.
commented by fkv (2019-11-03 16:07:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Barriers is an informational page only, and the passage in question was inserted by user Oligo without discussion. The access keys are actually defined on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access which explicitly states: "Access values describe legal permissions/restrictions." That leaves no doubt, does it? However, there have been various mistakes in the translations of this page, e.g. the german translation had an incorrect definition "nicht erlaubt oder nicht möglich" (not permitted or not possible) for the "no" value from 2008 till 2015, when it was finally corrected to "nicht erlaubt" (not permitted) as in the English page. Mistakes like this, particularly when they stay in the Wiki for so long, spread like viruses, and that's why many mappers and even validators believe that lift gates must be tagged with foot=yes etc. :-(
commented by aceman444 (2019-11-03 18:58:36+00:00): I see the slight difference between allowed and physically possible, but which isn't important for normal traffic (and routing engines). It is only relevant for emergency vehicles (e.g. ambulances or fire trucks), which can ignore the legal permissions, but not the physical ones. But it hard to fix the data now if there are so many mistakes in the wiki. Also, what are the proper tags to tag the physical accessibility, if it isn't https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access ? foot=yes on a lift gate isn't a problem for me, as there are some where 'foot' is not allowed/possible, some where it is, and some are private only (foot/access=private). So tagging foot=yes to specify what it is seems correct to me. Otherwise there may be doubt and I think routers should avoid such unsure barriers.
commented by fkv (2019-11-03 21:27:55+00:00): I'm curious for a real-world example of a lift gate where 'foot' isn't allowed. The signs usually refer to a road or area, not the barrier. It hasn't even been properly discussed whether access tags on barriers are about passing the barrier or operation of the barrier. E.g. access=private may also mean that only authorized people are allowed to open and close a lift gate, while everbody is allowed to pass it when possible.

To answer your question about the proper tags: For the specific case the note is about, you can use the width tags I mentioned. In general, I think that we need a new tag such as locked=no/padlock/electric/wire/permanent together with operation=manual/switch/key/automatic/remote/smart_card/fingerprint, similar in spirit (but not in syntax) to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/entrance/door#Accessibility_information. These tags can not only be used on barriers, but also on buildings, hunting stands, boxes, and anything that can be opened and closed. I have been comtemplating for ages to write a proposal... I'll support you if you do it. :-)
commented by aceman444 (2019-11-16 20:34:53+00:00): Well, I have never seen 'width' tagged on a barrier and I would find it weird due to these reasons: 1. mappers do not roam around with distance meters to input the 'width' properly, but they can guess whether a block or bollard is intended to disallow cars or above. 2. it would be funny to input your width in a navigation app when you are in pedestrian or bicycle mode ;) I have yet to see one that would even offer that possibility.
commented by fkv (2019-11-16 20:48:03+00:00): I do roam around with a distance meter, and if you dont' have one, you can estimate the distance. There are almost 2 millions of instances of the width tag, and most of the values are estimated.
If you want a feature implemented in a navigation app, ask for it. In German, we have a saying: "Von nichts kommt nichts."
commented by aceman444 (2022-02-26 17:18:22+00:00): Hi, 'width' seems to mean the width of an object, not of the gap inside it. Only on roads (highway) that may be the same as the possible widths of vehicles that can drive it. For that maxwidth:physical seems to be the right tag, as you said.
I have made a pull request into OsmAnd to support maxwidth:physical in car navigation mode.

I have also retagged similar barrier in Slovakia at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9508004170 from motor_vehicle=no to maxwidth:physical. There is also a photo of the barrier at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2611935 .

Please tag the barrier on this Austrian road as you proposed so that we can resolve this note. Thanks
commented by fkv (2022-02-26 17:42:48+00:00): I somehow lost track of what is really here. Looks strange in recent aerial images.
commented by aceman444 (2022-02-26 17:52:23+00:00): Yes. All imageries like basemat.at, Geoimage.at, even Slovak Ortofotomozaika SR show some long barrier/object across the road now. It is unclear whether even pedestrians can pass here.
closed by PPete2 (2023-11-11 10:05:43+00:00): No passing possible even not for walkers due do a fence and a locked gate. So both roads are seperated now - no connection between them
commented by aceman444 (2023-11-11 12:14:58+00:00): Hi. If there is a gate, someone can pass there (the owner of the key). So at least a footway should connect those 2 roads. It is not correct to separate the roads without any connection (with access=private).
commented by PPete2 (2023-11-11 12:30:27+00:00): No, there is a conrete-barrier on the South then a fence with gate which is additionally locked with a chain key and then another concrete-barrierer on the North. This former connection is not intendet to be crossed any more - not even by foot.
So it's correct that both ways are not connected anymore.
opened by Professor Dave (2019-04-15 12:58:16+00:00): The old Springmaid pier or waht is left of it is here
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:01:20+00:00): Die Straße hat die Bezeichnung: Westerfelln
commented by richard23 (2019-08-06 16:25:54+00:00): DA Nord sagt, auch Kirchenweg
commented by Silur (2022-02-07 20:32:58+00:00): Ich vermute hier einen Irrtum vom DA Nord: Die Kirchenstiege rund um Rellingen führen alle von entfernten Orten direkt zur Rellinger Kirche. Dieser Weg käme nur aus den Wiesen, wohingegen der westliche Weg früher wohl eine direkte Verbindung über die Pinnau zum Kirchenstieg aus Borstel-Hohenraden hatte.
"Westerfelln" lässt sich in alten Protokollen der Gemeinde Tangstedt von 2009 recherchieren als zu renaturierenden Weg, würde ja passen.
closed by DCA (2022-08-31 13:28:10+00:00): Hab's mal eingetragen... und schließe hier, da ihr euch einig seid :-)
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:01:51+00:00): Parque Mirador del parque 2
closed by AngocA (2021-05-15 18:31:15+00:00): Conjunto mapeado.
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:03:34+00:00): Die Straße hat die Bezeichnung: Kronenkamp
commented by richard23 (2019-08-06 16:22:53+00:00): DA Nord kennt keinen Namen für den Weg
commented by ma-rt-in (2020-01-15 13:55:53+00:00): wer ist DA Nord @richard23?
closed by richard23 (2020-01-15 15:29:40+00:00): DigitalerAtlasNord
Denke, wenn dort kein Name angegeben ist, dann gibt es den auch nicht. Auch die normale Googlesuche fördert da nur eine komische Karte zu Tage, sonst kennt das Web nix zum Kronenkamp in Tangstedt.
Ich mach das mal zu.
commented by ma-rt-in (2020-01-20 11:15:54+00:00): Ich mach hier noch mal auf, da es wie mir es scheint der NANord keine zulässige Quelle und somit als Referenzwerk geeignet wäre. 
Ich kenne es aus meiner Heimat, das es Wirtschaftswege gibt, die keine Namen nach durch die Gemeinde ansich sondern durch die Bürger erhalten haben. Sprich nur lokal bekannt sind und vermutlich nicht offiziell erfasst wurden.
commented by richard23 (2020-01-20 16:34:23+00:00): Und wer bestimmt dann den Namen? Ein paar alte Bauern? Die Hundgassirundengemeinschaft? Die örtlichen Mountainbiker oder Nordic-Walkingtruppe?
commented by ma-rt-in (2020-01-20 19:32:21+00:00): Das weiß ich nicht, da ich die örtlichkeit nicht kenne. Aber i-wo her kam ja die Wegebezeichnung.
commented by Todeskuh (2020-10-02 15:55:09+00:00): Wie wäre es dann mit einem loc_name?
commented by ma-rt-in (2020-10-04 11:57:16+00:00): loc_name sollte man nur verwenden wenn name schon belegt ist. Was in dem Fall ja nicht so ist.
commented by richard23 (2020-10-06 12:03:22+00:00): Es bleibt doch ganz einfach: 
Irgendwer behauptet, dieser Weg würde von irgendwem so inoffiziell bezeichnet. 
Und wir tragen das auf Zuruf so ein.
Ich behaupte, und ich wohne Luftlinie keine 10km weg und bin da öfter mit dem Radl unterwegs: Der Weg nennt sich Bahnhofstraße. Ich schwör. Unter Radfahrern ist das die Bahnhofstraße. Schon immer so gewesen.
Das sollte jetzt reichen, damit wir das so eintragen.
commented by businessesMan (2022-05-10 21:52:51+00:00): Ein üblicher Name, ist halt ein üblicher Name, wenn die Bewohner das vor Ort so nennen, dann ist das komplett legitim so einzutragen. Wenn der Name nicht üblich ist, kann sich ja ein weiterer Ortskundiger dazu äußern. Natürlich wäre es besser, wenn sich noch ein paar mehr "Locals" zu dem Namen äußern könnten. OSM ist halt ein Projekt, wo man den Nutzern ein gewisses Stück vertrauen muss, sonst kann mans vergessen. Was das "Bahnhofstraße" beispiel angeht, würde das auch erst einmal so niemand eintragen, weil das eher nicht als üblicher Name erscheint, da hier kein Bahnhof steht. Kronenkamp klingt nicht zu abwägig. Warum sollte auch jemand irgendwo im Nirgendwo nur zum "trollen" einen kleinen Waldweg in Kronenkamp umbenennen lassen.
commented by keo-dk (2024-05-14 17:45:51+00:00): Auf Seite 3 hier https://www.findcity.de/images_flipbook/25462zz/ steht auch Kronenkamp. Ist aber ja wohl keine zulässige Quelle...
commented by Wulf4096 (2025-11-02 09:31:01+00:00): Man braucht schon irgendwas objektiv nachprüfbares. Das scheint es hier nicht zu geben.
Es könnte sich hierbei auch um https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright_Easter_Eggs handeln.

Die Broschüre wird von einem privaten Anbieter erstellt; auf Seite 5 wird auch nochmal auf's Urheberrecht hingewiesen.
Diese Quelle ist nicht zulässig und auch nicht zuverlässig.

Vorschlag: Jemand aus der Gegend fragt mal beim zuständigen Amt nach Unterlagen, aus denen sich der Name dieses Feldwegs ergibt. Schleswig-Holstein hat hierfür das IZG-SH.

Ansonsten kann diese Notiz auch zu.
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:04:12+00:00): Die Kreuzung wurde neu gestaltet (Eröffnung März 2019). Einfahrt in die Friedenstrasse jetzt neu mit einer Verkehrsinsel und zwei Zebrastreifen mit abgesenkten Bordsteinen und Blindenmarkierung
Ferner existiert an der Stelle eine Fußgängerampel über die Stuttgarter Straße bei Blumen Kraft.
closed by Geofreund1 (2019-05-03 17:49:24+00:00): ist eingetragen
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:04:40+00:00): terminus Blue Ridge Parkway
closed by bdentremont (2023-04-07 18:41:38+00:00): Resolved without change.

Checked current end of parkway against current ESRI imagery and all looks correct.
opened by Jarek 🚲 (2019-04-15 13:06:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/281921393 is named "Kiwanas" but should probably be "Kiwanis"
closed by Jarek 🚲 (2019-04-18 13:09:34+00:00): fixed it along the way
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:07:25+00:00): Die Straße hat die Bezeichnung: Salwischtwiete
closed by Katzenstreu (2019-10-09 19:23:28+00:00): erledigt https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75479915
opened by Jastin172429 (2019-04-15 13:07:46+00:00): Other:
Speed limit on this area is changed to 60kmh. From inkster to Adsum.
This error is submitted from Navmii GPS.
opened by erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-04-15 13:09:34+00:00): alinhar vias
opened by Jarek 🚲 (2019-04-15 13:10:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6304072699 misspelled "Crotchet", should be "Crochet"
closed by Jarek 🚲 (2019-06-08 01:07:18+00:00): updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71041489
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:10:44+00:00): Ab 15.4. ist die Bergische Straße zwischen den beiden Kreuzungen mit der Rheinischen Straße eine Einbahnstraße in Richtung Osten. Der nördliche Teil der Rheinischen Straße ist zwischen der östlichen Kreuzung miter der Bergischen Straße und der Einfahrt zu Gut Hahn eine Einbahnstraße in Richtung Westen. Quelle: https://www2.haan.de/bi/vo0050.php?__kvonr=2878
closed by user_3022894 (2019-08-20 20:18:32+00:00): genau, ist vollkommen richtig. Ich habe es jetzt eingetragen, danke für den Hinweis.
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:12:44+00:00): onosm.org submitted note from a business:
name: آموزشگاه رانندگي مينا
phone: 03538216600
website: 
twitter: undefined
hours: Saturday-Thursday 7:00am to 8:30pm
category: Driving Schools,
address: Iran
closed by freebeer (2019-11-11 11:29:39+00:00): this is not the iran you are looking for
opened by TaraV (2019-04-15 13:13:02+00:00): Please check whether this road is named Osborne Avenue or Hampton Street (found on data TIGER Roads 2018 and https://vgin.maps.arcgis.com )
opened by Jarek 🚲 (2019-04-15 13:14:21+00:00): Trinity Drive https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5941449 is currently shown as connecting straight through to Strachan, with bicycle=yes and width=7m. However, immediately north of Queen/Strachan there is an ornamental gate which in my experience is always closed, or at least I've never seen it open passing here several times a month. That means the bicycle connection to Strachan is not straight nor 7 metres wide. Does anyone know if the gate is in fact open at times, and if so, when?
closed by Jarek 🚲 (2019-05-11 23:41:22+00:00): I assume this note about Trinity Drive was resolved by accident
closed by Jarek 🚲 (2019-08-02 13:17:01+00:00): updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72940377
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:14:56+00:00): Hier ist die Praxis Dr. Missaghian-Marx. Die Volksbank ist umgezogen zur Hauptstraße 44.
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:18:51+00:00): Adams Residencial Village
commented by  (2019-07-31 10:31:05+00:00): lar patriota
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:18:53+00:00): Bewell Head Working Mens Club has now been demolished. The land is now private housing.
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:20:51+00:00): onosm.org submitted note from a business:
name: Porsa chem exir
phone: 02144262406
website: Porsachem.com
twitter: undefined
hours: Saturday-Wednesday 8am to 5pm, Thursday 8am to 1pm
category: 
address: برق آلستوم
closed by kartonage (2021-01-22 09:00:26+00:00): onosm.org duplicate note.
opened by Viera97 (2019-04-15 13:20:58+00:00): "Restaurante de 10-10 diario, y los sábados cabaret de 10pm-2am"
POI name: Pizzería las Delicias
POI types: amenity-restaurant internet_access-wlan
OSM data version: 2019-03-28T14:13:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by Matthew Darwin (2019-04-15 13:21:02+00:00): Missing landuse=grass?
closed by LogicalViolinist (2019-10-23 12:25:14+00:00): Fixed
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:22:45+00:00): Tatsächlich ist es so: Es ist zwar die Einfahrt vom Schleienufer verboten, die Bürgelstraße ist aber keine Einbahnstraße. Einfahrt ist also nur über die Hegelstraße möglich, Ausfahrt über die Hegelstraße und das Schleienunfer.
opened by rezosocial (2019-04-15 13:23:03+00:00): Foyer de vie Camille Claudel
closed by Britzz (2019-06-09 21:13:06+00:00): créé
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:24:59+00:00): Η εδρα μου δεν ειναι Τουρκια, αλλα περαμα αττικης
opened by riuri (2019-04-15 13:26:39+00:00): sem nomes de ruas
closed by BladeTC (2019-04-15 17:18:05+00:00): Pronto!
opened by dcpaschall (2019-04-15 13:26:44+00:00): East Coast Greenway now follows the Jack A. Markell Trail instead of the on-road interim route to the east (DE-9). See map.greenway.org for latest route.
opened by Hobbits (2019-04-15 13:29:13+00:00): "Млин Добровольського"
POI has no name
POI types: building
OSM data version: 2019-03-14T00:11:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by Hobbits (2019-04-15 13:29:13+00:00): "Кам'яниця Шульців"
POI has no name
POI types: building
OSM data version: 2019-03-14T00:11:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by Pedro Lorenzo Hechavarria Pupo (2019-04-15 13:30:50+00:00): The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI name: Mi hija
POI types: tourism-apartment
OSM data version: 2019-03-14T00:11:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by BaboucheVerte (2019-04-15 13:31:21+00:00): manque un chemin

via StreetComplete 11.0
commented by David Crochet (2019-04-16 09:48:52+00:00): Où ?
commented by  (2019-04-18 14:06:40+00:00): un chemin part du carrefour vers le sud-est. balisé "chemin des orchidées"
commented by David Crochet (2019-04-18 17:24:30+00:00): Il est présent maintenant ?
commented by  (2019-04-18 23:27:41+00:00): Il y était il y a 3 jours oui.
opened by TaraV (2019-04-15 13:32:52+00:00): Please check whether the correct name is Belvue or Bellvue Lane.
opened by "АО"Казахтелеком (2019-04-15 13:33:13+00:00): "ул.Толағай 8"
POI has no name
POI types: building
OSM data version: 2019-03-14T00:11:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by "АО"Казахтелеком (2019-04-15 13:33:14+00:00): "улица Дəстүр 8"
POI has no name
POI types: building
OSM data version: 2019-03-14T00:11:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by Botschek54 (2019-04-15 13:33:19+00:00): Die Straße lautet Pachnerstraße und nicht Prachtnerstraße
commented by  (2019-04-15 13:49:56+00:00): Falls Du Lust hast, darfst Du sie selbst dementsprechend ändern:
Klick hier:
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=583469285#map=18/49.24380/12.08274
.
Viel Spass dabei :-)
opened by suslikk (2019-04-15 13:33:28+00:00): родная бочка (пиво)
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:42:20+00:00): onosm.org submitted note from a business:
name: آموزشگاه رانندگي مينا يزد
phone: +983538216600
website: 
twitter: undefined
hours: Saturday-Thursday 7:00am To 8:30pm
category: ,Driving Schools
address: Iran yazd
closed by Sosha1996 (2023-08-03 09:09:06+00:00): this note closed by script for due inactivity.
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:48:09+00:00): parking aérien
closed by Ptigrouick (2022-08-18 11:35:53+00:00): Pas de parking visible ici, merci de préciser la position exacte.
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:48:13+00:00): ГПИ Градостроительства и архитектуры
opened by erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-04-15 13:53:32+00:00): mapear
opened by Miguelprieto (2019-04-15 13:55:32+00:00): "No hay parada"
The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI has no name
POI types: highway-bus_stop
OSM data version: 2019-03-14T00:11:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by Miguelprieto (2019-04-15 13:55:32+00:00): "No pasan omnibus por aqui"
The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI has no name
POI types: highway-bus_stop
OSM data version: 2019-03-14T00:11:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by Miguelprieto (2019-04-15 13:57:50+00:00): "No hay psrada"
The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI name: Dolores y Diez de Octubre
POI types: highway-bus_stop
OSM data version: 2019-03-14T00:11:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by Miguelprieto (2019-04-15 13:59:27+00:00): "No hay parada"
The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI name: Lacret y 10 de Octubre
POI types: highway-bus_stop
OSM data version: 2019-03-14T00:11:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by  (2019-04-15 13:59:57+00:00): manque les 4 bâtiments de l'AGAPEI
closed by orhygine (2019-08-05 21:41:06+00:00): Ajout des bâtiments
opened by  (2019-04-15 14:02:59+00:00): Hälsobemanning i Stockholm AB
commented by johantiden (2020-09-04 18:32:11+00:00): Added!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7876328253
opened by Manuela Gonzalez (2019-04-15 14:05:22+00:00): "- Edificios Art Decó
Edificio Glaoui
Cine Rialto
Mercado Central 
"
POI name: Boulevard Mohammed V
POI types: psurface-paved_good hwtag-oneway highway-residential
OSM data version: 2019-03-28T14:13:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by mseifert (2019-04-15 14:06:04+00:00): Unable to answer "How many levels does this building have?" for https://osm.org/way/131677242 via StreetComplete 11.0:

two garages, not a residential building
closed by Znaika (2020-05-20 14:56:39+00:00): changed to garages, capacity 2