commented by freebeer (2018-02-08 10:33:47+00:00): Thanks.
The reason I bring it up is that this follows the format of Mapbox questions submitted by the great unwashed public as feedback, that except when it's obviously bogus, generally comes from eyes-on-the-ground pointing out an issue with the OSM data.
That may not be the case here - this name does not come up on the OSM wiki list of active Mapbox paid mappers, but her OSM entry lists her interest in the SF imports, and diary entries mention the Mapbox team, so in this case I suspect it's true.
You may also encounter the Telenav team, who will open Notes to invite the local community feedback by pointing out inherited TIGER typos or inconsistencies in road naming, some of which take raw data analysis to interpret (I've taken to commenting on those as well in hopes of opening up new ways of resolving or interpreting the data, after failing to understand the first Notes I saw from both and the grounds behind them, resolving one in an area I know based on a Google text search for plausible facts, but now I don't bother with those because relying on Google's search algorithms for altering data in OSM isn't something I like to do, unless it's spending a good part of an hour with the results trying to familiarise myself with the area and enhancing my own knowledge as the great trek on the path towards the insignificant goal of resolving a bug-report.  That is a bleedin' long parenthetical aside, sorry you lost interest long ago.)
Whilst wandering about Mexico earlier today, I observed again that over a partticular area all such Mapbox customer feedback queries were closed without comment and no change to the OSM data, that I'd observed in a different area of Mexico my last pass over.
Further, in Canada, I saw a mapper close all local notes asking confirmation, with an angry comment that mappers aren't there to verify the info, don't bother posting a bug-report unless you've verified it yourself.
Obviously not everyone understands the intent behind the Mapbox notes.  I even read confusion in the Notes thread in the dutch forum about why an Indonesian mapper would be wondering about things, which of course was explained their resources versus what a local mapper could verify.  Don't remember if the customer input/feedback was mentioned there.  Yes, there is a thread out there specifically for Notes, not just one-off abuses.  And yes, the dutch have, um, ``interesting'' ideas to solve the problem you tackle in your local area and I tackle around the globe with Notes.
Anyway, that's a bit of background info to help.  I wasn't really asking for mapping resources, I leave those to local mappers who know the legal status of their sources for OSM data, the US being an exception with much federal data public domain, local govs iffy, whereas nearer to me there is an official source with 100% permission, and a second official source without and which has filed repeated legal warnings or takedowns so that any mapper who so much as mentions any of a number of sources risks a revert, and gets told out.
I recently removed two streetnames, one I had deduced from text in a local government online publication, both found with the aid of the google text search engine, to clear my conscience -- and that's how I started slaying notes, seeing my pleas for local mappers disappear into a needle-(leaf)-forest that needed to be culled.
But I'm digressing.  Again.