piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:09:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93288605#map=17/-35.2595162/150.5168702layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
closed by rivermont (2018-09-09 15:12:49+00:00): Resolved in changeset #62427410
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:09:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116955041#map=17/58.6750124/13.2200666layers=N
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:09:17+00:00):  Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
closed by dannmer (2025-06-10 12:58:32+00:00): appears to have been fixed
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:09:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117335633#map=17/52.1130761/-1.0531157layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
closed by eastender (2019-03-05 10:04:49+00:00): Updated to steps.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:09:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117617920#map=17/52.7359164/-1.2049861layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
closed by eastender (2019-03-03 11:31:31+00:00): Updated to steps.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:09:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119260149#map=17/50.7937572/4.6406592layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
commented by  (2019-08-04 01:20:20+00:00): seem to be fixed to bridge=broadwalk highway=path, which is consistent with eg. the Doode Beemde. close this?
closed by Jakka (2019-08-06 14:38:40+00:00): Why not ?
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2019-08-11 22:24:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119260149#map=17/50.79376/4.64066 is still highway=footway + steps=yes

Are there steps here or not? If yes - then highway=steps is correct. If not - then steps=yes should be removed
commented by T6IAUAI6BJS2TS7ILG6Q (2019-08-21 17:18:46+00:00): On the end towards the hut, there are steps indeed.
closed by Jakka (2019-08-21 18:56:52+00:00): with mapillary image from bhiker update done. thx
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:09:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121024730#map=17/53.6972901/-1.0420422layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
closed by eastender (2019-03-08 07:41:31+00:00): Updated to steps.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:09:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121086980#map=17/32.7087193/35.1360294layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
closed by SafwatHalaby (2017-11-21 09:50:16+00:00): Closed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53971016
opened by midnightcomm (2017-11-10 19:09:37+00:00): weight station
closed by thatoneiowan (2018-02-06 07:20:43+00:00): Added
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:10:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127191575#map=17/47.8017892/8.1838909layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
closed by Ryukia (2021-10-14 20:54:23+00:00): Update area +tagging of steps corrected
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:12:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128091452#map=17/34.7893453/-87.6422739layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
commented by micahcochran (2018-03-26 15:14:07+00:00): I agree with retagging this as highway=steps.  I may have tagged that years ago.  This is a trail that has lots of steps. Generally on this trail, the steps are made of rock or wood.

I don't really remember which way these steps are inclining.
closed by micahcochran (2018-04-04 14:51:44+00:00): I went ahead and retagged this, which hopefully resolves this issue.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:12:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136938028#map=17/51.0675523/-0.9486574layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
closed by eastender (2019-02-28 15:56:03+00:00): Updated to steps.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:12:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164448239#map=17/50.6814638/7.2674213layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
closed by HeinerSchaefer (2019-05-16 15:38:57+00:00): geändert
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:12:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172771938#map=17/46.2671371/10.9576216layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
closed by tyr_asd (2017-11-12 20:45:12+00:00): fixed
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:12:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175828346#map=17/42.2994744/-86.3251108layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
closed by emersonveenstra (2022-07-19 21:13:35+00:00): fixed
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:12:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236786620#map=17/51.6528688/-9.9076136layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
closed by DaCor (2020-11-17 18:26:47+00:00): steps=yes removed. There may be a step or two somewhere along the length but the entire way is not steps so its been poorly mapped from the start.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:12:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231954886#map=17/-34.0411459/151.080878layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
commented by  (2017-11-10 21:46:45+00:00): Good question. This is a very rough path, that has a few (natural, not man made) "steps". It is not a flight of stairs. You could remove the "steps=yes" if it is not correct usage. Also, the "bicycle=no" is not correct. There is no particular access restriction on bicycles there.
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-11 17:02:45+00:00): then probably smoothness would be a good tag to describe this ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness )

smoothness=very_horrible?
commented by  (2018-04-10 14:07:16+00:00): that is a very interesting little patch. I can tell you this: prior to about 1880 there was an Aboriginal trackline that runs to that point from behind Woronora cemetery and down to the back of Gymea Bay where Sylvania Rd. that is why Forest Road is not continuous and dog legs at various points. this section has never been a road, its never been useful as roadway, its never been improved much beyond its original trackway which is curious historically. You have the "natural stone bridge" in there, noted by Matthew Flinders
commented by  (2018-04-10 14:11:21+00:00): also , curiously, the red dotted "right of way" between Blackburn and Salisbury...that lays exactly over the original trackline. its a bit of Gymea that we can pin down these pre European things quite clearly
commented by  (2018-04-10 14:14:22+00:00): its hard to see how these days but the cultural significance is that its a canoeing head. the waters a long way down the road these days
commented by  (2018-04-10 14:20:16+00:00): the reason its conserved in that degraded form is that its within the area reserved for the F6
closed by awmross (2020-02-02 20:45:30+00:00): Removed "steps=yes" tag.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:12:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219696073#map=17/51.0290625/-0.9942826layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
closed by eastender (2019-02-28 16:21:52+00:00): Updated to steps.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:12:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187997949#map=17/33.6520087/-116.2230764layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
commented by JaggedMind (2017-11-10 20:13:05+00:00): No idea. That was 5 years ago.
closed by dannmer (2025-06-10 13:00:57+00:00): fixed
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:13:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176519195#map=17/46.6341068/10.9131986layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:13:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176519195#map=17/46.6341068/10.9131986layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
closed by ma-rt-in (2020-06-11 12:45:42+00:00): Ich mach das hier mal zu, da der Link nicht auf diesen Ort zeigt und ganz woanders ist
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:13:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151039530#map=17/51.0926896/-0.993462layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
closed by eastender (2019-03-01 08:09:41+00:00): Updated to steps.
opened by  (2017-11-10 19:13:25+00:00): лежачий полицейский
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:15:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176698457#map=17/46.8775725/11.1470444layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
commented by  (2018-02-02 21:34:34+00:00): this tagging is 5 years old...there was no highway=steps and so step was mapped this way.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:15:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229586122#map=17/50.511667/13.0205191layers=N

 Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sLv for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
commented by wielandb (2022-06-05 09:05:08+00:00): Photos of the Situation. The path with the note are steps.

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/96538.jpg
https://westnordost.de/p/96539.jpg
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-05 10:17:57+00:00): edited - just to confirm, is entire https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229586122 section (from crossing to crossing) being steps?
commented by LeChris (2024-05-24 17:02:24+00:00): On the position in the map there are no steps on the "Curt-Herbert-Richter-Weg"

The steps are only on one side in the crossing area below the path - between the connection from north to south-west on the western section of the map (north-south direction) -> please look at my new photo - the steps are on the right side in the pic

Attached photo(s):
https://westnordost.de/p/214701.jpg
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-28 18:21:53+00:00): then it seems to be mapped correctly now, right?
commented by LeChris (2024-05-28 19:45:06+00:00): Yes, It's correct.
closed by Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-30 18:18:41+00:00): closing then, thanks for checking!
opened by  (2017-11-10 19:16:58+00:00): onosm.org submitted note from a business:
Name: Alt Media Studios
Phone: 440-777-6666
Website: https://amst.com
Twitter: undefined
Hours: Monday-Friday 9:00am - 5:00pm
Category: ,Web Design,Marketing
Address: 5567 Mayfield Rd
closed by freebeer (2017-12-06 10:18:10+00:00): on the map
opened by Anas_moheb (2017-11-10 19:17:19+00:00): "بغداد ، عاصمة العراق التاريخية ، المدينة الاجمل والاكبر في الجمهورية .
تتربع على ضفاف دجله ، بجانبيها الكرخ والرصافه اللذان يضفيان على سحر النهر سحراً .
"
POI name: بغداد
POI types: place-city-capital-2
OSM data version: 2017-10-20T12:20:02Z
 #mapsme
opened by _Jonas_ (2017-11-10 19:18:07+00:00): The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI name: Corner
POI types: amenity-bar
OSM data version: 2017-10-20T12:20:02Z
 #mapsme
commented by craxgard (2023-07-24 11:32:32+00:00): Uppdaterat på kartan!
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:18:40+00:00): is it airport and runway present or not?
closed by MarTintamarre (2020-03-26 15:29:34+00:00): Airport has been removed in the meantime
opened by C-SIm (2017-11-10 19:21:33+00:00): merendero 3 mesas y fuente de agua sin garantías sanitarias
closed by sanchi (2019-01-22 10:56:26+00:00): añadido
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:22:46+00:00): amenity=toilets is supposed to be used only for public toilets, amenity=toilets with access=private makes no sense Is it place with a public toilets or not?
closed by bison166 (2019-02-11 12:01:26+00:00): wer pinkeln geht... darf das bestimmt
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:23:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/255030081#map=17/54.9588768/9.4195603layers=N

amenity=toilets is supposed to be used only for public toilets, amenity=toilets with access=private makes no sense Is it a place with a public toilets or not?
commented by b-holdet (2020-03-10 17:25:06+00:00): This place is for scouts and the area is private.
How will you tag this toilet then?
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2020-03-11 06:31:13+00:00): Either use access=customers (if it is a actually a public toilet, but restricted to scouts etc) or delete it (if it is a private toilet).
commented by AsgerFrank (2020-03-11 17:18:41+00:00): I have had intentions of solving this note, for two years now, but never could decide on the access tag. I pass the Stevninghus every now and then, actually. 
Nevertheless, the suggestion "customers" seems appropriate, as the place is run by the national scout organization, renting out to primarily scouts, but also "external" customers.
closed by b-holdet (2020-03-11 17:21:35+00:00): I have now changed access to access=customers for the toilet and will close these notes
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2020-03-12 17:47:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/255030081#map=17/54.9588768/9.4195603layers=N remains unchanged
closed by b-holdet (2020-03-12 18:19:33+00:00): Please check if everything is ok now
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:23:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/255030016#map=17/54.955974/9.4260903layers=N
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:23:22+00:00): amenity=toilets is supposed to be used only for public toilets, amenity=toilets with access=private makes no sense Is it a place with a public toilets or not?
commented by  (2018-06-28 03:17:46+00:00): Toilets #255030016
commented by  (2018-06-28 03:19:50+00:00): 

Track #23552685
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2018-06-28 16:14:10+00:00): @anonymous, tour comments are not clear at all.
closed by b-holdet (2020-03-11 17:22:13+00:00): Solved as https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1202192
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:23:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/255029997#map=17/54.9608851/9.4188084layers=N

amenity=toilets is supposed to be used only for public toilets, amenity=toilets with access=private makes no sense Is it a place with a public toilets or not?
closed by b-holdet (2020-03-11 17:21:56+00:00): Solved as https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1202192
opened by Tomek Jawny (2017-11-10 19:24:55+00:00): "conforama"
POI has no name
POI types: building
OSM data version: 2017-10-20T12:20:02Z
 #mapsme
closed by Syl (2020-01-27 11:44:03+00:00): Nom déjà présent
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:26:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/274741523#map=17/51.6960306/-3.7640119layers=N

amenity=toilets is supposed to be used only for public toilets, amenity=toilets with access=private makes no sense Is it a place with a public toilets or not?
commented by Mex (2023-02-24 12:15:42+00:00): there is camping here so maybe should be access=customers?
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-24 12:44:29+00:00): if it is limited to camp residents then it would work well!
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:26:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/278936714#map=17/60.4219132/22.2966233layers=N

amenity=toilets is supposed to be used only for public toilets, amenity=toilets with access=private makes no sense Is it a place with a public toilets or not?
commented by  (2019-06-25 15:31:47+00:00): It's a private area. Toilets removed
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:26:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/288670462#map=17/58.4146604/12.3225068layers=N

amenity=toilets is supposed to be used only for public toilets, amenity=toilets with access=private makes no sense Is it a place with a public toilets or not?
commented by Grillo (2017-11-10 21:16:16+00:00): It makes sense as it's toilets available for customers at the camping site.

access=customers might be better tagging though, but I'm not sure since you can't access only the toilets without entering the camping site.
closed by Finkelmannen (2020-01-08 14:37:07+00:00):  toilets available for customers at the camping site.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:26:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/292769403#map=17/47.6999809/8.5793771layers=N

amenity=toilets is supposed to be used only for public toilets, amenity=toilets with access=private makes no sense Is it a place with a public toilets or not?
closed by Piagno (2020-04-19 18:43:47+00:00): In the note it is apparent one needs a key from the commune
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:26:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/294545388#map=17/58.6346331/11.6887161layers=N

amenity=toilets is supposed to be used only for public toilets, amenity=toilets with access=private makes no sense Is it a place with a public toilets or not?
closed by Msiipola (2024-09-30 13:48:11+00:00): CS for this created 16 years ago, and Note 7 years ago, and no respons.
The toilett is propabley public, because there are several hiking routes nearby. 
I have looked at website for nearby hostel Wauglen (http://www.wauglen.se/index.htm), 
and did not find any info about this toilett.

Deleting the access and operator tags.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:26:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/301485710#map=17/50.7497803/6.0575433layers=N

amenity=toilets is supposed to be used only for public toilets, amenity=toilets with access=private makes no sense Is it a place with a public toilets or not?
commented by Peer van Daalen (2017-11-11 11:52:34+00:00): Das Toiletten-Häuschen (Dixie-Klo) ist nur mit einem Schlüssel zu öffnen, von Personengruppen, die den Waldgrillplatz Adamshäuschen beim Forstamt Adamshäuschen gebucht haben.
-
http://www.aachen.de/DE/stadt_buerger/politik_verwaltung/stadtrecht/pdfs_stadtrecht/363.pdf
commented by Peer van Daalen (2017-11-11 11:53:19+00:00): Die chemische Toilette und der Müllcontainer stehen nur im Sommerhalbjahr (in der Regel von Mitte April bis Mitte Oktober) zur Nutzung bereit.
closed by Peer van Daalen (2017-11-16 09:26:52+00:00): Also ich denke, daß hier alles soweit korrekt ist. Außerdem kann man bei Bedarf auch ins Gebüsch pinkeln ....
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:26:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/304103303#map=17/51.3149633/-1.117751layers=N

amenity=toilets is supposed to be used only for public toilets, amenity=toilets with access=private makes no sense Is it a place with a public toilets or not?
commented by DorneyLake123 (2024-12-04 16:13:54+00:00): looks to be a portacabin from 2020 bing streetside
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:26:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/354652929#map=17/51.272095/12.9226102layers=N

amenity=toilets is supposed to be used only for public toilets, amenity=toilets with access=private makes no sense Is it a place with a public toilets or not?
closed by uvi (2022-03-06 06:24:10+00:00): deleted
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:26:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/385455972#map=17/40.3617554/-75.6243963layers=N

amenity=toilets is supposed to be used only for public toilets, amenity=toilets with access=private makes no sense Is it a place with a public toilets or not?
commented by Colebrookdale Railfan (2017-12-20 00:00:36+00:00): I'm not going to resolve this one quite yet, but I believe these would be considered private toilets as they are part of a campground.
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-20 13:15:04+00:00): So accessible to customers? I would use access=customers.
commented by Colebrookdale Railfan (2017-12-20 20:40:22+00:00): Sounds like a good solution to me.
closed by Colebrookdale Railfan (2017-12-21 20:41:29+00:00): Changed to access=customers.
opened by  (2017-11-10 19:26:43+00:00): Dom Postoła.
closed by user_4493657 (2017-11-11 15:20:34+00:00): Informacje prywatne
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:26:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/390541297#map=17/48.5856894/21.2545956layers=N

amenity=toilets is supposed to be used only for public toilets, amenity=toilets with access=private makes no sense Is it a place with a public toilets or not?
closed by FishDoctor (2020-08-02 10:22:28+00:00): access: private -> customers