piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
commented by pwbriggs (2026-02-27 05:59:15+00:00): Is this the same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4222956?
commented by talapus (2026-02-27 07:08:36+00:00): Ah, yes!  But we only fixed half of it.  The path itself is also private, there is another gate preventing access to 163rd. I will fix it, since it is verified.
opened by BerndK (2026-02-26 15:52:58+00:00): Bücherschrank

via StreetComplete 62.2

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/329075.jpg
closed by Tatfahren (2026-02-26 19:29:41+00:00): hinzugefügt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179100946
opened by  (2026-02-26 15:53:23+00:00): "1054567 tienda sury r5229"
POI name: 1054567 tienda sury r5229
POI types: shop-convenience
OSM data version: 2024-04-05T18:17:46Z
 #mapsme
opened by Fotonick (2026-02-26 15:53:29+00:00): "It's in another nearby building"
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-02-16T20:35:12Z
POI name: Coastgate Hotel. Miritni
POI types: tourism-hotel
 #organicmaps android 2026.02.20-1-Google
opened by Fotonick (2026-02-26 15:53:30+00:00): "Correct location"
OSM snapshot date: 2026-02-16T20:35:12Z
POI name: Coastgate Hotel
POI types: tourism-hotel internet_access-wlan
 #organicmaps android 2026.02.20-1-Google
opened by Felipe Cubillos Aguirre (2026-02-26 15:53:38+00:00): PEAJE SAN DIEGO
opened by  (2026-02-26 15:53:57+00:00): typo
opened by  (2026-02-26 15:54:14+00:00): Capitalization mistake
opened by  (2026-02-26 15:54:20+00:00): Typo
opened by  (2026-02-26 15:56:47+00:00): onosm.org submitted note from a business:
نام: یکبارمصرف پاک ظرف
addr:street=Felestin Sharghi9
addr:city=Ardabil
addr:postcode=5619841730
شماره تماس: 04533599267
ساعات کاری: شنبه _ جمعه ساعت۱۰:۰۰_۱۴:۰۰ ، ۱۶:۰۰_۲۱:۰۰
دسترسی با ویلچر: limited
توضیحات: فروش ظروف یکبار مصرف
روش های پرداخت پذیرفته شده: 
takeaway=yes
opened by  (2026-02-26 15:57:18+00:00): Ośrodek Kształcenia Zawodowego

#OsmAnd
closed by uprkos (2026-03-06 17:13:00+00:00): Zaktualizowałem po wizycie na miejscu. Zachęcam do samodzielnej edycji punktów handlowych i usługowych. Łatwo i przyjemnie można to zrobić na przykład poprzez aplikację EveryDoor.
opened by Bydruf (2026-02-26 15:59:06+00:00): Unable to answer "What surface does this road have?" – Am Steinhaus (Service Road) – https://osm.org/way/29509177 via StreetComplete 62.2:

Weg existiert nicht, hier ist ein Vorgarten

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/329076.jpg
opened by  (2026-02-26 16:00:13+00:00): NORDEX ALPINE
commented by CN-MB01-01 (2026-02-26 16:07:55+00:00): [ALPHA-3][2026-02-26 05:07 PM]  
From: OP-MB01-07  
To: CN-MB01-01, NT-MB01-07  

Nordex Alpine – underground node active.  
All surface sensors report clear; tunnel ingress points secured.  
Subsurface excavation ongoing at levels -50m to -420m for primary section.  
Air filtration nominal; minor vibration detected near northern wall, likely glacial shift.  
Lighting and auxiliary power stable; all operator stations fully functional.  

End of transmission.
closed by EN-MB01-03 (2026-02-26 16:13:47+00:00): [BETA-2][2026-02-26 05:12 PM]  
From: EN-MB01-03  
To: CN-MB01-01, SC-ALP-12, OP-MB01-07  

Nordex Alpine – door systems status.  

All rail mechanisms are seated and operational; tested panel movement from -50m to -120m without abnormal resistance. One of the upper tracks had slight misalignment, corrected with calibration wedges — tolerances now within spec.  

The double-panel reinforced doors are heavier than anticipated; six operators moving manually were able to shift some parts, but we’re relying on full automated rails for routine operation. Locking nodes are engaging smoothly with wall-integrated control units; no binding detected.  

Minor vibrations from tunnel excavation are noticeable, but stress sensors on the plates show tolerances are well within safety parameters. Doors are silent enough when moving slowly; a moderate speed test produced a satisfying controlled “thump” on the stops — reassuring, but not too harsh for the underground structure.  

Next: I’ll monitor door hydraulic response under continuous cycles overnight and log any deviations.  

End of transmission.
closed by GeorgeKaplan (2026-02-27 05:38:23+00:00): Pas de note personnelle svp
opened by  (2026-02-26 16:01:12+00:00): میدان جوزدان
opened by LFSW (2026-02-26 16:03:37+00:00): "Duplicate"
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-02-16T20:35:12Z
POI name: Restaurant Taman Emas.Laksa
POI types: amenity-restaurant
 #organicmaps android 2026.02.18-5-FDroid
opened by LFSW (2026-02-26 16:03:37+00:00): "Wrong location"
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-02-16T20:35:12Z
POI name: King Kebab
POI types: amenity-fast_food
 #organicmaps android 2026.02.18-5-FDroid
opened by  (2026-02-26 16:04:28+00:00): میدان جوزدان
opened by I-76 (2026-02-26 16:05:45+00:00): Is leisure=park the right tag for this area? It's a managed grassy area with scattered trees. While rarely used, I have seen people having a picnic here once or twice.
commented by pkoby (2026-02-26 18:25:15+00:00): Probably. Because it has artwork and mown grass, it functions as a park, and it seems to be Lower Merion-owned. But it's not really accessible by foot, and I doubt it would be relaxing with Conshohocken State Road there. It's not an official park, so if you're on the fence, maybe just tag as grass?
closed by I-76 (2026-02-27 02:05:39+00:00): The artwork is a small sculpted head carved by the residents of the house by it, though it is outside their fence. It might be improperly tagged as well smh. I feel it’s fair to leave as a park, considering there’s a couple areas in lower merion already parks even if they aren’t used that way, like (pick your section of) pencoyd park.
closed by I-76 (2026-02-27 02:06:07+00:00): The other example is Williamson road site.
commented by dannmer (2026-02-27 12:39:32+00:00): I've been past here thousands of times over many years and have never seen anyone using this space. I think it requires more than township ownership and mowed grass to be a park. There's been a recent tendency to map Lower Merion Township owned properties as parks even though they don't function as parks. In some cases private property appears to be mapped as park land.
commented by I-76 (2026-02-27 13:14:46+00:00): Right. Some other areas mapped as parks are no better than this one was my point. I looked through a number of tags yesterday and came  across something=greenery, which might suffice better than a park for a couple areas. The signed part of pencoyd park should probably be a park, but some of the other areas might belong as a nature preserve or something similar. Gully run park by righters mill road is never used.
commented by I-76 (2026-02-27 14:24:42+00:00): https://www.lowermerion.org/departments/parks-and-recreation-department/township-parks has a strange category of undeveloped sites as "parks": Black Rock Road Site
Merion Square Road Site
Pencoyd Park
Righters Mill Road Site
Simpson Island
Williamson Road Site

Simpson Island is tagged as a nature reserve, Merion Square Road Site is unmapped (It is a forest on a hill), Righters Mill Rd tract is mapped as part of Gulley Run Park, Pencoyd Park is in pieces, and the other two sites are mapped as parks. Boy is this confusing. I also saw something on the website called Fuller Tract, "undeveloped open space" which "connects Gulley Run Park and Eco Valley Nature Park.
commented by dannmer (2026-02-27 15:20:33+00:00): I think tagging some of these as nature reserves would be more accurate, however they aren't managed as nature reserves like places such as Riverbend, Saunders Woods, or Idlewild Farm. The naming of some of these places isn't accurate either, while I doubt many people search for directions to Pencoyd Park but if they do they are going to end up in the wrong location as mapped.
commented by I-76 (2026-02-28 16:18:32+00:00): Yeah we need some consensuses here. I'll discuss on monday.
commented by I-76 (2026-03-02 14:46:10+00:00): I'll go down the list, sorted into categories based on my knowledge and opinion:

Parks mapped as parks, to stay as parks: 
Bala Cynwyd Park, Gen'l Wayne Park, Amherst Field, Narberth Park, Narbrook Park, McMoran Park, Eco Valley Nature Park, Rolling Hill Park, Mill Creek Valley Park, Gladwyne Park, Ashbridge Park, Penn Wynne Park, Wynnewood Valley Park, South Ardmore Park, Vernon Young Park, Austin Park, Shortridge Park, Merion Botanical Park, Margaret Braun Hill (location needs adjustment), Pencoyd Park (by Greentree Ln), Sabine Park, West Mill Creek Park, Flat Rock Park, Waner Ave Park, Packer Park, Linwood Park, Merion Gateway Park, Wynnewood Station Park, Bala Ave. Park, Cynwyd Station Park, Cynwyd Heritage Trail Space, and Gulley Run Park ( segments which touch Bryn Mawr Ave).

Other spaces in the township currently mapped as parks, nature preserves, et al -- either I do not know how to tag or know little about:
Kenealy Nature Park, Henry Lane Park and Garden, Saunders Woods, Idlewild Farm, Black Rock Road Site, Williamson Road Site, Harriton Park, Appleford Estate, Riverbend, Indian Creek Basin Park, Sharpe Bird Sanctuary

Other publicly open spaces mapped in the Township: 
Stoneleigh, Wheeler/Harriton Farms Woods, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471302992 

Other areas I believe are incorrect or missing:
Lewis J Smith Park (encompassing pool and roller hockey, separated from McMoran Park by the hill), Righters Mill Road Site (currently mapped as encompassed by Gulley Run Park, should be mapped the same as Williamson/BR sites), Merion Square Rd Site (missing, same qualifications), Fuller Tract?

We still need to discuss Pencoyd Park and where it deserves to be mapped. It is signed by Greentree Rd, and that is where it is according to LM Parks (https://www.lowermerion.org/departments/parks-and-recreation-department/township-parks). I just feel like the other three areas that were mapped deserve to be tagged as something. 
(Note character limit)
commented by I-76 (2026-03-02 14:49:46+00:00): We also need a consensus on the borders and tagging of McMoran Park, Lewis J Smith Park, Eco Valley Park, this park on the corner, and whether it or Fuller Tract deserve to be mapped.

I also don't know if Kenealy Nature Park deserves to be a nature reserve. I've walked through both it and Rolling Hill Park (and Mill Creek Park), and I see no difference between the way the three are maintained, other than Richie Ashburn Field.
commented by dannmer (2026-03-02 15:25:13+00:00): The first issue to resolve is whether parks like Rolling Hill, Kenealy, and Mill Creek fit the OpenStreetMap definition of a park. They are mostly unmaintained natural areas with trails. Rolling Hill is the only one with a lawn area, buildings, and other features.
commented by dannmer (2026-03-02 15:26:00+00:00): Forgot to add the link to OSM park definition: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
commented by I-76 (2026-03-02 15:54:24+00:00): Fair point. I agree leisure=park might not be the best tag for woodland/forest parks. leisure=nature_reserve might work better for Kenealy, Rolling Hill, Mill Creek, etc, except that the wiki states that reserves are "protected area of importance for wildlife", and if nothing much but the trails are maintained, would boundary=forest fit better somewhere?
commented by pkoby (2026-03-02 16:15:00+00:00): So looks like I've never read the wiki page for parks…

I've worked on some of this sort of tagging with https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ElliottPlack in Baltimore. The tags we landed on were boundary=protected_area, protect_class=5. I think protection_title=City Owned Park would apply as well. Wissahickon Valley Park is tagged this way (by me), but I guess that shouldn't be a leisure=park. Unless something's a designated nature reserve (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484364316), I wouldn't tag it as that. boundary=forest also doesn't seem right.

My opinion on Rolling Hill, Kenealy, and Mill Creek is that they aren't for the most part leisure=park (exceptions are the Richie Ashburn Field part of Kenealy and the dog park and parking area of Rolling Hill).
commented by dannmer (2026-03-02 23:23:20+00:00): @pkoby Thanks for the response, I’ll look at this tonight. The use of park or nature reserve for the Lower Merion properties like Rolling Hill or Mill Creek Valley Park doesn’t seem appropriate so protected area sounds like a 
good option.
commented by dannmer (2026-03-05 13:31:50+00:00): I implemented the suggestions from @pkoby for Mill Creek Valley Park, I left a note at the park as well. Let me know if any changes are needed.
commented by I-76 (2026-03-05 13:51:10+00:00): I don't really see how Mill Creek Valley Park fits the definitions of protected area class 5 according to the wiki, but if that is how things are tagged elsewhere, I understand it. We haven't come to a consensus on the street name Sites mapped as parks, however. I have no idea how to tag them, given that the Township calls them parks as well as "undeveloped lands", and not all of them are mapped right or at all:
Merion Square Road site is missing, but it's merely a forest on a hill bordered on three sides by street.
Righters Mill Road site, just south of this note, is mapped as part of Gulley Run Park.

@dannmer Idk what you used to redefine the boundaries of Eco Valley Park, but it is now smaller than how the township defines it according to the 2020 map. The Township also claims that Lewis J Smith Park encompasses the pool and roller hockey, and Fuller Tract (unknown type) connects Eco Valley Park to Gulley Run Park.
commented by I-76 (2026-03-10 00:05:42+00:00): Here is a link that might be helpful to the park definition: 
https://www.lowermerion.org/departments/building-and-planning-department/long-range-plans-projects/township-wide-planning/comprehensive-plan/open-space-plan/osp-inventory-of-existing#twpparkinv
commented by I-76 (2026-03-10 12:22:14+00:00): Retagged this as grass with ownership=municipal
commented by I-76 (2026-03-16 14:33:11+00:00): I aligned a woods segment to call Fuller Tract based on the parcel map. Still need to determine the status of Willamson/BlackRock/MerionSquare Road sites, because current leisure=park tagging is incorrect.
closed by I-76 (2026-03-24 15:47:22+00:00): Looks like those were tagged as nature reserves
opened by BerndK (2026-02-26 16:06:00+00:00): Unable to answer "Which customers visit this hairdresser?" – Hairstudio Maja (Hairdresser) – https://osm.org/node/3782110977 via StreetComplete 62.2:

Fahrschule FIX
opened by  (2026-02-26 16:07:07+00:00): onosm.org submitted note from a business:
نام: لاکی لاک
addr:city=Aliabad-e Katul
شماره تماس: 09115272926
دسته‌بندی: فروشگاه های آرایشی و بهداشتی
توضیحات: فروشگاه لوازم تخصصی ناخن
روش های پرداخت پذیرفته شده: 
takeaway=yes
opened by  (2026-02-26 16:08:43+00:00): onosm.org submitted note from a business:
Name: باشگاه آریومن
addr:street=بلوار دکتر اسلامی بیدگلی
addr:place=باشگاه آریومن
addr:city=آران و بیدگل 
Phone number: +98 913 975 1725
Wheelchair accessibility: no
Category: Gyms or Fitness Centers
Accepted payment methods:
closed by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (2026-06-24 14:07:32+00:00): to person creating thousands upon thousands of this notes - have you considered actually editing OpenStreetMap? You cannot copy shops locations from Google Maps, but you can go on walk and add some of them. Or map remotely, there is Bing Streetside imagery in some places. Or map buildings remotely.

Creating note flood is simply not useful, or even harmful.

closing not needed onosm note

Iran is simply flooded with them - with so many that people started closing notes in Iran solely for being old, and over 60 000 notes were closed in 2023. It is better to close part of this not needed flood and notes with higher chance of being useful will remain.

Note that notes about missing shops are nearly useless - they do not speed up mapping, it is trivial to find missing shops nearly anywhere.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-notes-country?c=Iran&stats=full and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-notes-country-custom?c=Iran&query=open

Closing part of this onosm.org spam as vandalism cleanup
opened by  (2026-02-26 16:09:11+00:00): E' stata inviata una nota tramite su.openstreetmap.it:
Nome: Edicola riVista
Categoria: Edicola
Indirizzo: Piazzale degli Eroi , 00136 Roma
Modalità di pagamento accettate: 

Tag suggeriti: (⚠️ = richiede controllo)
name=Edicola riVista
addr:street=Piazzale degli Eroi
addr:city=Roma
addr:postcode=00136

takeaway=undefined
opened by  (2026-02-26 16:15:41+00:00): Ain’t no slaves in the water
commented by NeisBot (2026-02-26 16:26:08+00:00): The note is ~57 km away from Dettah. This appears to be quite distant from the nearest plausible location in OSM. 

If this note is related to a specific location, could you please provide additional details or confirm its relevance to the existing or missing OSM data? Thank you! 

#FarAway
closed by pitscheplatsch (2026-02-26 18:35:30+00:00): #nonsense
opened by otremo (2026-02-26 16:16:52+00:00): Unable to answer "This shop has been vacant. What’s here now?" – house number 10-12: Vacant Shop – https://osm.org/node/2620012236 via StreetComplete 62.2:

Laden für Fitness- Gerät
closed by Muhmaker (2026-03-23 19:54:24+00:00): Der Laden für Fitness-Geräte ist bereits ein paar Meter weiter östlich eingetragen. Hier ist ein Laden mit einem seltsam gemischten Angebot drin. Möbel, Innendeko, Haushaltseinrichtung, Küchengeräte. Ich habe mehrere Werte für shop eingetragen. Bekommt dann halt kein eindeutiges Symbol im Rendering: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2458984464
opened by otremo (2026-02-26 16:16:52+00:00): Unable to answer "Do you need to pay to enter here?" – Burg und Festung Sparrenberg (Historic Fortress) – https://osm.org/way/19789175 via StreetComplete 62.2:

Burggelände ist kostenlos betretbar, die Besteigung des Turmes kostet.
closed by Muhmaker (2026-07-12 18:44:39+00:00): Am Turm war schon fee=yes eingetragen. Ich habe für das gesamte Burg-Gelände fee=no ergänzt.
opened by Felipe Cubillos Aguirre (2026-02-26 16:17:20+00:00): peaje san juan
opened by BerndK (2026-02-26 16:17:20+00:00): Unable to answer "What is the width of the opening here?" – Gate – https://osm.org/node/3984288491 via StreetComplete 62.2:

Baustelle.

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/329077.jpg
opened by JamesCoyle (2026-02-26 16:19:23+00:00): No ground floor

via StreetComplete 62.2
opened by Geovelo_Notes (2026-02-26 16:20:50+00:00): Parking vélo non repertorié - Poteau
parking vélo en gare
Capacité: 6
Photo·s et/ou informations disponibles ici: https://amenagements-cyclables.fr/fr/contributions/115191
(This note has been created from Geovelo)
commented by Geovelo_Notes (2026-03-06 15:29:28+00:00): Un commentaire a été ajouté par un cycliste Geovelo : "Bonjour,
Merci pour ces précisions.
Les données ont été mises à jour sur la carte / OpenStreetMap et sera visible prochainement sur Geovelo.
Cyclablement,"
closed by Geovelo_Notes (2026-03-06 15:29:28+00:00): Geovelo closed this note
opened by Uncle181 (2026-02-26 16:22:39+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Bicycle Parking – https://osm.org/node/1195992331 via StreetComplete 62.2:

Il y a 3 arceaux vélos ici, donc 6 places
closed by rezemika (2026-03-03 13:04:21+00:00): C'est corrigé. :)
Cela dit les vues Panoramax montrent qu'il y en avait trois en 2018, et plus que deux en juin 2025.
opened by  (2026-02-26 16:25:36+00:00): Rewe macht zu. Ab Mai ist hier ein Nahkauf.

https://merkurist.de/mainz/am-stiftswingert-rewe-in-mainzer-oberstadt-schliesst_kqzU/5Rrc
commented by hmpfgnrrr (2026-03-05 18:54:44+00:00): Schon mal auf "disused" gesetzt. Die Note kann zur Erinnerung offen bleiben, bis der Nachfolger drin ist.
closed by geowas (2026-05-26 11:55:09+00:00): Der Nahkauf ist hier schon gelöscht.
commented by hmpfgnrrr (2026-05-26 15:35:57+00:00): Der Rewe ist gelöscht. Jetzt warten wir darauf, dass der Nahkauf einzieht.
commented by dreua (2026-05-26 16:09:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11821660283/

Wir könnten hier auch zu machen und drauf warten, dass der Nahkauf per Streetcomplete eingetragen wird, wenn er denn kommt. Bei disused wird da regelmäßig gefragt.
closed by hmpfgnrrr (2026-05-27 15:41:39+00:00): Ich benutze StreetComplete nicht und komme normalerweise auch nicht in dieser Ecke vorbei. Aber wenn du meinst, dass es nicht vergessen geht, dann soll mir das recht sein.
opened by RamsiHartmann (2026-02-26 16:26:52+00:00): Spielplatz

via StreetComplete 62.2
closed by Tatfahren (2026-02-26 19:23:19+00:00): Dopplung von https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5182480
opened by Endas (2026-02-26 16:29:06+00:00): This area has been renovated and now hosts, two large buildings, One public storage and one store front closer to the road
opened by  (2026-02-26 16:29:17+00:00): "803397 tienda victoria r5229"
POI name: 803397 tienda victoria r5229
POI types: shop-convenience
OSM data version: 2024-04-05T18:17:46Z
 #mapsme
opened by MbertKa (2026-02-26 16:29:47+00:00): Unable to answer "This shop has been vacant. What’s here now?" – house number 26: Building – https://osm.org/way/117226310 via StreetComplete 62.2:

Werkstatt für Guitarren, vermutlich Siccas Guitars
commented by george1201 (2026-02-27 07:58:38+00:00): Diese Siccas-Werkstatt ist bereits in der Roonstr. 19 mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11373427298 eingetragen. Sind die umgezogen?
commented by MbertKa (2026-03-09 15:00:53+00:00): also definitiv eine Werkstatt von Siccas, bin noch nicht dazu gekommen, in der Roonstr. 19 vorbei zu schauen...
closed by george1201 (2026-03-24 22:33:38+00:00): ... aber ich :-)
Beim Laden in der Roonstraße 19 sind die Rollläden runtergelassen. Scheint leer zu stehen. Firmenschild hängt noch im Fenster. Die sind umgezogen. Ich habe den Knoten dort deaktiviert und hier neu eingetragen.
opened by Jan2Paul (2026-02-26 16:32:05+00:00): Hier ist ein gepflasterter Fussweg

via StreetComplete 62.2

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/329078.jpg

GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jan2Paul/traces/12218436
closed by redrace (2026-02-27 07:50:26+00:00): selbst von dir eingetragen!
opened by RamsiHartmann (2026-02-26 16:33:16+00:00): Spielplatz

via StreetComplete 62.2

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/329079.jpg
closed by Tatfahren (2026-02-26 19:26:02+00:00): hinzugefügt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179100810
opened by CptReckless (2026-02-26 16:34:25+00:00): Unable to answer "Are these opening hours still correct?" – Barrel Weinbar (Bar) – https://osm.org/node/2866626835 via StreetComplete 63.0-beta2:

Balance Wein Bar (Eugenschreibung)
Keine Öffnungszeiten
opened by CptReckless (2026-02-26 16:35:48+00:00): Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – outside: Euronet (ATM) – https://osm.org/node/4718259839 via StreetComplete 63.0-beta2:

Now a "cash zone" ATM
opened by  (2026-02-26 16:37:29+00:00): onosm.org submitted note from a business:
Nombre: kaka
addr:housenumber=23
addr:street=Avenida Agustín Conde de Foxá
addr:place=Churc
addr:city=Ciudad Rodrigo
addr:postcode=37500
Categoría: Trampoline Parks
Descripción: jaja
Métodos de pago aceptados:
closed by Hugoren Martinako (2026-02-26 16:37:53+00:00): prueba
opened by Jorge Dávila López (2026-02-26 16:37:47+00:00): Unable to answer "Is there a crossing here?" – https://osm.org/node/13151854420 via StreetComplete 62.2:

Zona Militar
opened by  (2026-02-26 16:38:38+00:00): je suis sur pix et je dois faire ça désolé
opened by PromeneurFou (2026-02-26 16:39:02+00:00): This place does not exist:
"il y a un seul bâtiment c est le numéro 35 "
A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-01-22T18:08:18Z
POI has no name
POI types: building
 #CoMaps ios 2026.02.09-4-ios