piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
commented by vectorial8192 (2026-02-13 16:50:06+00:00): At this location, there are two turn restrictions with this fixme.

The easier one is "Tai Tong Road cannot u-turn to (self) Tai Tong Road". This is trivially true.

The harder one is "Tai Tong Road (roundabout) cannot right-turn to Kiu Hing Road". Normally you cannot cross over double-lines (e.g. no overtaking). The shape is very unique here, but essentially this looks like the vehicle would be crossing the double-lines to reach the opposite side of the road, which should be permitted.

I think this interpretation is OK. See if any vehicle guys can chime in, but if no reaction, I will take this interpretation and do the changeset.
commented by kingkingHK (2026-02-14 02:56:39+00:00): I went there recently and confirmed that it is chevrons, not double white lines, and afaik chevrons cannot be crossed even for turning right.

Interestingly, the chevrons start a bit after the kerb (you can kind of see this on aerial imagery). I can't tell if this is done deliberately to allow vehicles to turn right from Kiu Hing Road, or if the paint has simply worn out from heavy vehicle turning. Anyhow, Kiu Hing Road has right turn arrow, so we don't have to worry about that.
closed by vectorial8192 (2026-02-15 17:00:24+00:00): OK, trusting the chevron observation.

Then, resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178591191 ; closing.
opened by RIKASUN001 (2026-02-10 05:27:31+00:00): Heming International School 合明國際學校
commented by RIKASUN001 (2026-02-25 09:30:51+00:00): Heming International School 合明國際學校
opened by HappyMapper173 (2026-02-10 05:28:56+00:00): 중간에 3/4차선으로 바뀌는 부분 있음

via StreetComplete 62.2

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/327125.jpg
opened by  (2026-02-10 05:29:15+00:00): Car spare parts
Ehsan spare parts
closed by Ehsan62 (2026-02-12 14:15:00+00:00): نبش خیابان هنگام نرسیده به چهارراه استقلال
opened by  (2026-02-10 05:30:24+00:00): onosm.org submitted note from a business:
نام: روستای اعتبارالدوله درخشانیه
addr:housenumber=۱
addr:street=درخشانیه
addr:place=روستای اعتبارالدوله
addr:city=اعتبارالدوله
addr:postcode=111111111111
دسته‌بندی: باغ ها
توضیحات: روستای اعتبارالدوله درخشانیه
روش های پرداخت پذیرفته شده: 
takeaway=no
takeaway:description=روستای اعتبارالدوله
opened by  (2026-02-10 05:31:22+00:00): لوازم یدکی احسان
02177450898
closed by pitscheplatsch (2026-02-10 16:11:01+00:00): #spam
closed by pitscheplatsch (2026-02-10 16:11:39+00:00): Duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5161919
opened by vectorial8192 (2026-02-10 05:34:00+00:00): cycle path has fixme:

probably ancient schema
commented by kingkingHK (2026-02-10 08:16:58+00:00): It seems like the footway wasn't mapped originally, hence `foot=designated` and `segregated=yes` was added to the cycleway to indicate this. Now that we have the footway mapped, I think we can simply remove the fixme.
closed by vectorial8192 (2026-02-15 10:33:07+00:00): Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178575319 ; closing.
opened by  (2026-02-10 05:34:31+00:00): Proposed road name: မဟာဗန္ဓုလလမ်း
closed by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:52:46+00:00): if it is only proposed, then it is not ready for mapping in OSM
opened by parklanemu (2026-02-10 05:35:46+00:00): Park Lane Properties

Address: MU, 4 Cap Dal Tamarin 90902
Phone:  +230 483 7575
Website: https://parklane.mu/

For over two decades, Park Lane Properties has been at the leading edge of the Mauritian real estate market. As an independent, family-owned boutique agency, we are dedicated to providing bespoke, top notch service rooted in integrity and a genuine commitment to prioritising our clients' requirements.

As the special associate of Christie's International Real Estate in Mauritius, we attach you to the world's most prominent name in luxury property, opening doors to unique global reach and presence for your property. This affiliation, together with our trusted subscriptions with Leading Real Estate Companies of the World ® and Luxury Portfolio International ®, ensures that your property trip is backed by the toughness of the world's finest networks

Our deep market knowledge and solid relationships with programmers enable us to present an extensive portfolio of costs properties and advancements across the island. With branches in crucial locations, our unequaled local expertise and personal strategy make us the standout choice for buyers, sellers, and renters seeking exceptional service.

Discover the Park Lane distinction, where your property journey is led by trusted guidance, local understanding, and an enthusiasm for excellence, raised by our global connections.
closed by pitscheplatsch (2026-02-10 16:10:31+00:00): #spam
opened by Nahkampfdackel (2026-02-10 05:36:35+00:00): Strassensperre wegen Brückensanierung

via StreetComplete 62.2
opened by  (2026-02-10 05:36:49+00:00): Proposed road name: မဟာဗန္ဓုလလမ်း
closed by NeisBot (2026-02-10 05:46:02+00:00): This note has the identical location and text 
as note https://osm.org/note/5161923

Therefore, it will be closed.

#DuplicateNote
opened by  (2026-02-10 05:37:53+00:00): kathan chowk
opened by yelisey90 (2026-02-10 05:40:36+00:00): "missing footpath through the stop"
OSM snapshot date: 2026-02-07T17:28:58Z
POI name: რაჟდენ გვეტაძის ქუჩა
POI types: public_transport-platform highway-bus_stop amenity-bench amenity-shelter
 #CoMaps android 2026.02.09-4
closed by yelisey90 (2026-02-10 07:54:51+00:00): added
opened by محمود  حیدری m (2026-02-10 05:43:23+00:00): تهرانسر
opened by kylor (2026-02-10 05:47:12+00:00): Road needs to be parted into two ways however I can't figure out how to do this.
commented by gpserror (2026-02-10 16:48:27+00:00): the OSM term is "dual carriageway" (if you want to search for it) but I don't think it's absolutely necessary to split it as it's a really short segment - and does not appear to be blocking turns which is the main reason to do it?  Or am I completely off base of what the issue is here?
commented by kylor (2026-02-10 21:40:25+00:00): I am not too familiar with roads however to me it looked very weird to leave it like this. also the middle island on the left bottom part has a turn left which I assume would have routing problems like this? I will leave the final call up to you if you know what you are doing.
commented by people128256 (2026-02-25 20:30:37+00:00): Are you trying to split Main Street or Maplewood?
commented by people128256 (2026-03-06 19:53:35+00:00): Hi @kylor, which street are you referring to?
commented by kylor (2026-03-18 02:03:35+00:00): split southwest main street
closed by ICT_maps (2026-03-18 02:10:08+00:00): updated
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:48:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6274020660/history this name ("park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:48:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6371654258/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:48:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6544235696/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:48:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7079223092/history this name ("park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:48:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7388646687/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:48:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7431653874/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:48:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7602598775/history this name ("park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:48:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7872536380/history this name ("park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:48:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7912645632/history this name ("park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:48:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8163871047/history this name ("park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:49:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8196034030/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:49:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8507261830/history this name ("park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
closed by Tomas09 (2026-06-17 23:13:51+00:00): Park doesn't seem to exist anymore since atleast 2025 according to esri. Deleted in 184248577
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:49:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8572015249/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:49:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9489753074/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:49:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9836036229/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:49:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9836174876/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:49:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9918746861/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
commented by GeorgeKaplan (2026-02-10 06:11:34+00:00): Yes
closed by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:33:04+00:00): removed name=Park as descriptive name per reply (tried also to ma park as an area but not sure without survey)
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:49:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9961291889/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:49:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10129541918/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:49:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10172975723/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:49:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10172975729/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:49:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10172975732/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:49:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10172975734/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:49:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10568545206/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:49:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11244580211/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
closed by Kecsege (2026-02-21 13:47:52+00:00): There is no park here, deleted.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:49:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11272230788/history this name ("Park" on leisure=park) is wrong and can be removed, right?
opened by  (2026-02-10 05:53:40+00:00): Proposed road name (my): စမ်းရေတွင်းလမ်း
opened by  (2026-02-10 05:55:02+00:00): ダイレックス
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 05:56:47+00:00): fikcyjny plac zmapowany zamiast area:highway
closed by lukabułka (2026-06-28 11:40:18+00:00): naprawione https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184738480
opened by yelisey90 (2026-02-10 05:58:18+00:00): "shop? or petrol?"
OSM snapshot date: 2026-02-07T17:28:58Z
POI has no name
POI types: shop
 #CoMaps android 2026.02.09-4
closed by yelisey90 (2026-02-10 08:09:51+00:00): fixed
opened by yelisey90 (2026-02-10 05:59:39+00:00): "sliding beam, not gate"
OSM snapshot date: 2026-02-07T17:28:58Z
POI has no name
POI types: barrier-gate
 #CoMaps android 2026.02.09-4
closed by yelisey90 (2026-02-10 07:53:47+00:00): fixed
opened by Toriii (2026-02-10 06:00:51+00:00): Hiroshi Wellness Healthcare Solutions
commented by Toriii (2026-02-10 06:01:10+00:00): Hiroshi Wellness Healthcare Solutions
opened by Boycott Google (2026-02-10 06:03:55+00:00): There is an Arby's here.
commented by user_23623664 (2026-02-12 13:09:55+00:00): Thank you! I added the Arby's as a point. The satellite imagery I have doesn't show the new restaurant building yet but rather the former house on the site. I will leave this note open so we can add the building itself when imagery becomes available.
closed by ICT_maps (2026-07-03 20:16:06+00:00): on the map
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:04:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10065442863/history

NSI claims that it is shop=chemist rather shop=cosmetics (which results in suggestion show in osm.org editor)

Is it a good suggestion that should be followed?

Or maybe https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index should be changed to allow both shop tags?
commented by Taktaal (2026-02-11 21:31:51+00:00): Looking at the website https://tigota.ch/ it seems that cosmetics fits this better.

Why do you think it should be a chemist?
closed by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-12 08:07:56+00:00): Oh right, NSI is limited to Italy - so https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=*&k=shop&v=chemist&tt=tigot%C3%A0 is not actually suggesting that
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:05:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13087099283/history

NSI claims that it is shop=chemist rather shop=cosmetics (which results in suggestion show in osm.org editor)

Is it a good suggestion that should be followed?

Or maybe https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index should be changed to allow both shop tags?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:05:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323664360/history

NSI claims that it is shop=chemist rather shop=cosmetics (which results in suggestion show in osm.org editor)

Is it a good suggestion that should be followed?

Or maybe https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index should be changed to allow both shop tags?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:12:56+00:00): Le Bleu
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/923487798/history

is it really amenity=restaurant and shop=tobacco at the same time?
commented by RandomMappppist (2026-02-10 11:56:03+00:00): C'est un café tabac. J'imagine donc que oui?
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-12 08:46:56+00:00): cafe would be amenity=cafe - right? (or is cafe in French standing for "restaurant"?)
commented by RandomMappppist (2026-02-12 11:24:40+00:00): According to the wiki, 

(café) is for a generally informal place with sit-down facilities selling beverages and light meals and/or snacks. This includes coffee-shops and tea shops selling perhaps tea, coffee and cakes, >>through to bistros selling meals with alcoholic drinks<<. 

I believe a french Café would fit into that last part but not sure what the common practice is.
commented by RandomMappppist (2026-02-12 11:27:10+00:00): Interestingly enough this question has been answered here : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/shop-ou-amenity-les-deux/3256

Saying that amenity + shop are both primary tags and can be put together.
commented by RandomMappppist (2026-02-12 11:45:21+00:00): Started a forum topic about it : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/amenity-cafe-ou-restaurant/41017/2
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-12 11:50:31+00:00): > Saying that amenity + shop are both primary tags and can be put together.

oh yes, it is not always a mistake

sometimes it can be valid, but large part of existing combinations is wrong (that is why I created note rather than making an edit - if such note turned out to be useless I will be avoiding making such notes in future)
commented by pyrog (2026-05-10 18:14:21+00:00): > is it really amenity=restaurant and shop=tobacco at the same time? 
bar + restaurant + tobacco + news agent + gambling/lottery

https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?pic=4f570532-c6fa-47d5-87ec-ffda99f9d925

See also : 
https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/points-de-vente-francaise-des-jeux/17851
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:13:08+00:00): Price Rite
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/980994938/history

is it really amenity=restaurant and shop=supermarket at the same time?
closed by dannmer (2026-02-10 10:30:23+00:00): upd
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:13:16+00:00): Harmonia Produtos Naturais
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1089384081/history

is it really amenity=restaurant and shop=supermarket at the same time?
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-17 20:24:24+00:00): are you sure that it is correct?
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-17 20:24:43+00:00): if, yes -how something can be supermarket and restaurant in the same space?
closed by Ferreira_Alexandre (2026-03-18 14:51:26+00:00): It's a space that sells natural products, and meals are served in an adjacent area.
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-21 08:25:28+00:00): if areas are separate maybe it can be mapped as two separate nodes?
opened by Harmony Rose (2026-02-10 06:13:55+00:00): Inlet/corner shown going towards building at this point does not exist. Road follows the curve of Sherman Rd. on to Gerry Rd. Please fix accordingly.
closed by jm428 (2026-02-18 16:19:22+00:00): fixed
opened by Armill35 (2026-02-10 06:14:07+00:00): "Poubelle auto-compacteuse"
OSM snapshot date: 2026-01-11T01:09:17Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-waste_basket
 #organicmaps android 2026.01.26-11-FDroid
commented by Everteal (2026-04-02 21:47:56+00:00): Bonjour,

Il n'y a pas de tag dans OSM pour indiquer ce status. Toutefois, votre indication semble suggérer que cette poubelle, taggé pour l'instant comme une poubelle de rue (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_basket), est en réalité un conteneur à ordures ménagère (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_disposal). Est-ce le cas ? Merci d'avance !
commented by Armill35 (2026-04-03 17:08:30+00:00): C'est bien une poubelle de rue.

Une BIGBELLY,
Solution par FUTURSTREET pour citer les nom de marques
https://futurestreet.fr/
On peut voir que Saint-Malo fait parti de leurs Partenaires Européens
closed by Everteal (2026-04-03 18:22:26+00:00): Ah, d'accord. J'ajoute les informations sur son fabricant (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180825613). Merci pour votre contribution à OSM !
opened by Armill35 (2026-02-10 06:14:07+00:00): "Verre"
OSM snapshot date: 2026-01-11T01:09:17Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-recycling-container
 #organicmaps android 2026.01.26-11-FDroid
closed by David Crochet (2026-02-22 12:42:45+00:00): ok
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:15:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563461620/history is tagged as building = proposed

Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.
closed by Geim (2026-02-10 18:40:49+00:00): Probably not. I did a feedback to BAG to ask them to update official records.
In the mean time I removed the building from OSM. If need to, it can be importet in no-time
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:15:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/571328419/history is tagged as building = proposed

Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:15:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577401051/history is tagged as building = proposed

Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:15:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1391765272/history

maybe shop=variety_store would be better for Dollar Tree?

See shop=variety_store

Maybe it would be fine for me to just edit it remotely from another continent rather than opening notes?
closed by ICT_maps (2026-02-10 11:46:32+00:00): updated to standard tags for chain
opened by yelisey90 (2026-02-10 06:19:44+00:00): "Mtavruli ბ?!"
OSM snapshot date: 2026-02-07T17:28:58Z
POI has no name
POI types: building
 #CoMaps android 2026.02.09-4
closed by yelisey90 (2026-02-10 08:14:26+00:00): fixed
opened by smueller22 (2026-02-10 06:20:16+00:00): Veralteter Firmeneintrag: „Helpy Care – Unterstützung im Alltag“.
Der Firmenname existiert nicht mehr und darf rechtlich nicht mehr verwendet werden.
Bitte eventuell vorhandenen POI vollständig entfernen, da er weiterhin in Bing Maps und Navigationssystemen angezeigt wird.
closed by mgerken (2026-02-10 12:26:23+00:00): Kein POI vorhanden, entsprechend nichts zu tun.
opened by JerzyRusz (2026-02-10 06:21:22+00:00): Unable to answer "What are the opening hours here?" – Naprawa GSM (Electronics Repair Shop) – https://osm.org/node/6381240088 via StreetComplete 62.2:

Napisano 24h

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/327126.jpg
closed by kubahahaha (2026-02-10 15:18:18+00:00): No to czemu nie zaznaczysz w apce 24/7?
opened by rasterfahndung (2026-02-10 06:22:02+00:00): This place does not exist:
"not therr"
A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-01-22T18:08:18Z
POI has no name
POI types: fee-yes barrier-toll_booth
 #CoMaps android 2026.01.24-5-FDroid
closed by map per (2026-02-10 16:59:22+00:00): Thanks, the toll booth is removed form OSM now
opened by  (2026-02-10 06:25:33+00:00): CASSONETTI X 68C + 68D
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:26:01+00:00): motor_vehicle=now
was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1450003225/history

Maybe
motor_vehicle=no
was intended here?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it?
opened by Emilio2005 (2026-02-10 06:26:29+00:00): L'esercizio commerciale indicato ha definitivamente cessato l'attività.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:29:23+00:00): mtb:scale=022
was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1462916144/history

Maybe
mtb:scale=0
was intended here?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it?