piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
opened by Davie Dean (2025-04-04 01:34:51+00:00): Graziella Court

via StreetComplete_ee 60.3
opened by Davie Dean (2025-04-04 01:37:32+00:00): In context of overlay "Buildings" – house number 197: Apartment Building – https://osm.org/way/1351767220 via StreetComplete_ee 60.3:

Apollo Apartments
opened by fhgurhei (2025-04-04 01:38:44+00:00): mostrar el pais peru y unicamente mostrar sus climas y temperaturas
closed by fhgurhei (2025-04-04 01:39:42+00:00): clima y temperatura
opened by JAndermander (2025-04-04 01:39:25+00:00): Unable to answer "How is this power line attached?" – Power Pole – https://osm.org/node/12518736423 via StreetComplete 60.3:

Horizontal and vertical

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/269196.jpg
commented by Natfoot (2026-01-19 07:57:38+00:00): pin is the answer I got  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aline_attachment%3Dpin
closed by Natfoot (2026-01-31 07:30:22+00:00): #added
opened by tbo47 (2025-04-04 01:39:39+00:00): https://www.dakaractu.com/Senegal-le-boulevard-General-de-Gaulle-devient-le-boulevard-Mamadou-Dia-a-Dakar_a260148.html

#OsmAnd
opened by Rieez (2025-04-04 01:44:15+00:00): Path

via StreetComplete 60.3

GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Rieez/traces/11948987
opened by cronoser (2025-04-04 01:45:02+00:00): revisar con Pablo hasta que punto tiene sentido añadir estaciones de tren en una linea que no está en funcionamiento 

#OsmAnd
commented by Carlos Jaraute (2025-07-10 16:19:07+00:00): Hola Cronoser, como no sea para el proyecto  openrailwaymap para marcar las antiguas estaciones
commented by Robot8A (2025-09-22 16:02:53+00:00): La estación puede seguirse etiquetando, como abandonada o en desuso https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:disused:railway%3Dstation
closed by Hugoren Martinako (2025-10-21 13:37:02+00:00): Mientras siga existiendo el edificio... marcado como disused
opened by DorneyLake123 (2025-04-04 01:45:52+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3664 part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/162862 ?

Both are called Trent Valley Way
opened by  (2025-04-04 01:46:40+00:00): There are no visible paths through the bushes on the south side of University Dr.
commented by dannmer (2025-04-04 09:56:28+00:00): No strava heat map activity for this trail and other recently added informal trails in the Grinnell Natural Area, both Hilgard Way and Grinnell Pathway show heat map activity.
commented by apgoldberg (2025-04-14 01:15:58+00:00): Thank you for making this note. There is a path through the bush in this area (pictures from Grinnell side and University Drive side):  https://imgur.com/a/wrBfXlf
I see others walk through here frequently to cut the corner between Hilgard Way and University Drive. I removed two of the paths which I haven't frequently seen walked.
Many paths on campus don't have GPS activity on Strava. In this case these paths might be something people don't like to run on and are too short for someone to start a hike activity.
opened by Kandpartners (2025-04-04 01:52:03+00:00): 亀戸4-39-6　成田ビル
opened by  (2025-04-04 02:00:06+00:00): Afghan.Ai
closed by aiapi8383 (2025-09-06 21:16:31+00:00): Bpsol
opened by  (2025-04-04 02:15:12+00:00): 單行道向東北

#OsmAnd
closed by Edison Wen (2025-04-10 13:37:24+00:00): fixed
opened by  (2025-04-04 02:15:31+00:00): 單行道向西

#OsmAnd
closed by Edison Wen (2025-04-10 13:36:05+00:00): fixed
opened by RaphaelPasloin (2025-04-04 02:26:30+00:00): Dedicated cycleway crossing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/714022880/history was deleted by changeset 144483013 

I have try to restore it but i get conflict validation, i prefer not to make a mistake doing that, so if a more experimented user can do it will be great.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1141074350118568
closed by bxl-forever (2025-04-04 14:50:28+00:00): Fixed, thanks.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164513063

Don’t hesitate to bring more reports about mistakes like this, because this user has retagged a lot of footways to make the map more "cycle-friendly" (and perhaps cycle-only), and there are probably still a lot of damaged items that went under the radar.
opened by  (2025-04-04 02:26:57+00:00): 公廁

#OsmAnd
closed by Edison Wen (2025-04-10 05:36:53+00:00): fixed
opened by partytax (2025-04-04 02:28:08+00:00): Going to be a church and something else
commented by partytax (2025-04-10 11:55:02+00:00): Living Word Ministries
closed by ICT_maps (2025-12-21 22:35:51+00:00): added
reopened by partytax (2025-12-22 17:55:46+00:00): Not open yet. They might have given up on this building.

#surveyme
commented by partytax (2026-07-14 21:46:18+00:00): Saw a local news article with a fresh render of proposed remodel
opened by Singledad29 (2025-04-04 02:32:10+00:00): Snazzymobileservices
commented by Singledad29 (2025-04-04 02:32:45+00:00): Snazzymobileservices
opened by Rieez (2025-04-04 02:34:25+00:00): PATH

via StreetComplete 60.3

GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Rieez/traces/11948995
opened by Pierre-Felix Breton (2025-04-04 02:34:49+00:00): surface probablement non asphaltee

#OsmAnd
closed by Martin868 (2025-06-22 22:07:06+00:00): ca fait aucun doute
opened by  (2025-04-04 02:38:45+00:00): Here road closed
opened by Ted Robinson (2025-04-04 02:44:57+00:00): I Fani (archaeological site, settlement of the Middle Bronze Age to the 5th century BC; discontinuous occupation)
opened by Touch Angchuan (2025-04-04 02:45:00+00:00): ป้าน้อง อาหารตามสั่ง
opened by  (2025-04-04 02:45:20+00:00): 公廁

#OsmAnd
closed by Edison Wen (2025-04-10 05:35:26+00:00): fixed
opened by Touch Angchuan (2025-04-04 02:47:05+00:00): Bit & Brew Cafe
opened by  (2025-04-04 02:51:46+00:00): Das Klinikum gibt es anscheinend doppelt: einmal korrekterweise als das gesamte Klinikgelände und dann scheint es noch einen zusätzlichen node für das Krankenhaus zu geben. Ich denke, dass man die Eigenschaften des node auf das Klinikgelände übertragen (und ggf. den node danach löschen) kann.
closed by ma-rt-in (2025-04-07 18:06:45+00:00): done
opened by Yaaaaaaaa (2025-04-04 02:52:50+00:00): maxspeed 50

#OsmAnd
opened by Yaaaaaaaa (2025-04-04 02:52:53+00:00): maxspeed 30

#OsmAnd
opened by  (2025-04-04 02:55:48+00:00): 新光吊橋 重建版

#OsmAnd
opened by Leo_tqz (2025-04-04 02:56:19+00:00): "Subestación Eléctrica ICE"
OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z
POI name: Avenida Primera
POI types: psurface-paved_good highway-residential
 #organicmaps android
closed by sebasbg20 (2025-06-26 20:52:50+00:00): Corregido
opened by  (2025-04-04 02:56:32+00:00): Fremont Ave
closed by dannmer (2025-04-04 09:37:34+00:00): possible misplaced note, no road here on available imagery
opened by  (2025-04-04 02:57:42+00:00): fgjghfjhj
closed by mavl (2025-04-04 08:10:28+00:00): This note does not contain a useful information for OpenStreetMap.
opened by strongholdroofinguk (2025-04-04 02:57:45+00:00): Stronghold Roofing & Guttering Ltd

21 Colne Reach Surrey TW19 6AD United Kingdom
0800 158 54 64
info@strongholdroofingandgutteringltd.co.uk
https://strongholdroofingandgutteringltd.co.uk

Stronghold Roofing & Guttering Ltd is a relied on name in professional roofing services, supplying high-quality solutions to maintain homes safe, secure, and looking their best. With years of industry experience, our skilled group offers expert craftsmanship, ensuring every project is completed to the greatest standards. Whether it's a minor repair or a total roof replacement, we take satisfaction in delivering exceptional results tailored to each property's unique requirements.

A strong and durable roof is crucial for protecting your home from the elements. Over time, exposure to harsh weather can cause wear and tear, resulting in leaks, cracks, and other structural concerns. Our group is experts in repairing and maintaining roofs of all types, guaranteeing they remain in leading condition for years to come. From conventional tiled and slate roofing to modern level roof solutions, we have the competence to handle jobs of any kind of size, supplying efficient and long-lasting results.
closed by ceirios (2026-05-07 19:26:26+00:00): SEO
opened by lessiopi (2025-04-04 03:00:59+00:00): Suspicious shop=books in the middle of a park. Is this a public bookcase? #surveyme
commented by theDM (2026-02-17 05:42:42+00:00): This is a public bookcase.
closed by lessiopi (2026-02-17 06:41:51+00:00): Thanks! I've re-tagged it as such.
opened by axdc11239 (2025-04-04 03:04:50+00:00): 竹科小農
opened by  (2025-04-04 03:05:17+00:00): Dusun Lete, Desa Gunung, Kec. Kota Komba, Kab. Manggarai Timur
closed by FajrAl (2026-07-03 02:46:05+00:00): telah ditambahkan / added
opened by Rieez (2025-04-04 03:10:31+00:00): Path

via StreetComplete 60.3

GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Rieez/traces/11949001
opened by  (2025-04-04 03:13:19+00:00): 日日朝食早午餐

#OsmAnd
opened by  (2025-04-04 03:14:30+00:00): 晨間廚房早午餐

#OsmAnd
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:14:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6791372416 should be an area https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aaeroway%3Aballoon
opened by  (2025-04-04 03:17:10+00:00): 寶成皇家大樓

#OsmAnd
opened by  (2025-04-04 03:18:04+00:00): QBurger

#OsmAnd
opened by  (2025-04-04 03:18:07+00:00): Mercadinho JM encerrou as atividades
closed by DressyPear4 (2026-04-13 18:23:13+00:00): Resolved with changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181289384 by noteSolver_plugin/0.5.0
opened by  (2025-04-04 03:18:53+00:00): nu pasta

#OsmAnd
opened by  (2025-04-04 03:19:14+00:00): Lanche da CRISTINA
closed by DressyPear4 (2026-04-13 18:23:12+00:00): Resolved with changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181289384 by noteSolver_plugin/0.5.0
opened by Rieez (2025-04-04 03:20:19+00:00): Path

via StreetComplete 60.3

GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Rieez/traces/11949002
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:25:17+00:00): Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Modelle
commented by mcliquid (2025-06-27 09:38:45+00:00): Wie würde man diese Notiz lösen können?
commented by ti-lo (2025-06-27 10:35:14+00:00): Indem man https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1333207568 umbenennt in aeroway:model_aerodrome=runway, z.B.. Daher auch der Link auf den Namensraum https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Modelle (damit man auch die anderen sieht)
commented by mcliquid (2025-06-27 10:51:22+00:00): Das verlinkte Proposal wurde nie akzeptiert. Das bisherige "aeroway=model_runway" hat 753 Nutzungen gegenüber nur 18 Nutzungen bei aeroway:model_aerodrome=runway.
Somit hat das bisherige Tagging-Schema die fast 42-fache Nutzung.
Der aeroway:-Namespace ist für reguläre Luftfahrtinfrastruktur reserviert. Die Einführung von Modellflugplätzen innerhalb dieses Schemas wirkt künstlich und inkonsistent. Und wenn man einmal aeroway:model_* akzeptiert, müsste man ggf. auch railway:model_*, waterway:model_*, etc. einführen. Das führt zu einer Fragmentierung der Struktur.

Wieso sollte man das deutlich etabliertere Tagging gegen ein nicht akzeptiertes Proposal austauschen?
commented by ti-lo (2025-06-27 10:58:19+00:00): Wie gesagt, der Link auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway sollte eigentlich verdeutlichen, warum aeroway:*=* Sinn  machen würde. Die "Millionen Fliegen können nicht irren"-Argumentation hat mir noch nie eingeleuchtet. Ebenso wie das herumreiten auf proposals. An dem Beispiel sieht man mal wieder, was dabei heraus kommt. "Der Rest der Welt" wird einfach ausgeblendet.
commented by mcliquid (2025-06-27 11:59:35+00:00): Ich verstehe deinen Punkt, dass Nutzungszahlen allein nicht alles sind und dass Innovation manchmal außerhalb formeller Proposals entsteht. Trotzdem ist es wichtig, innerhalb der OSM-Community möglichst konsistente und nachvollziehbare Strukturen zu fördern.

Der aeroway:-Namensraum ist bislang primär für reale Luftfahrtinfrastruktur vorgesehen. Wenn wir nun modellbezogene Objekte in denselben Namensraum verschieben, ohne dass dafür ein klarer Konsens besteht, riskieren wir semantische Unklarheiten – insbesondere für Datenverbraucher, die keine Trennung zwischen realer und modellhafter Infrastruktur erwarten.

Vielleicht wäre es sinnvoll, das Thema nochmal im Forum oder auf der Tagging-Mailingliste aufzugreifen, um eine breitere Diskussion anzustoßen? Möchtest du die Notiz etwa so lange offen lassen, bis wie durch ein Wunder ein Konsens zustande kommt?
commented by Tourism_info (2025-06-27 12:57:55+00:00): Ich dachte eher an "mit den Füssen abstimmen". Aber bring's ruhig im Forum an, bin gespannt ob etwas konstruktives dabei heraus kommt. Bei Fahrzeugwerten jedenfalls nicht, und das seit einer Dekade
closed by mcliquid (2025-06-27 13:14:41+00:00): Dann stimme ich mit den Füßen ab 😉
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:25:38+00:00): Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Modelle
opened by  (2025-04-04 03:25:39+00:00): 月租停車場

#OsmAnd
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:26:04+00:00): Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Modelle
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:26:39+00:00): Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Modelle
closed by G4rden3r (2026-03-08 09:41:02+00:00): ich mache das hier zu, da der user für noch weitere 9 Jahre gesperrt ist
opened by Sarawut Uttamawiriya (2025-04-04 03:26:40+00:00): this is btc space, btcspace do rent office, event evenul and co working space
closed by Sarawut Uttamawiriya (2025-04-04 03:27:32+00:00): why is Btcspace company not show
opened by  (2025-04-04 03:26:55+00:00): Anna Sports Club Chinnapettai
closed by Massmugi03 (2025-04-04 03:30:59+00:00): Anna Sports Club Chinnapettai
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:27:07+00:00): Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Modelle
commented by Im Fokus (2025-05-30 00:52:08+00:00): Tu dir keinn Zwang an
commented by Im Fokus (2025-07-20 00:25:52+00:00): Was spricht denn gegen 'model_runway' in Analogie zu 'runway' für die Verkehrsflugzeuge? Dass 'Aerodrome' bedeutender klingt?
commented by ti-lo (2025-07-21 14:43:57+00:00): Ich nehme an, Du sprichst davon, das als Wert und nicht als suffix auszudrücken, dass es sich um "model" handelt ?
1) Als suffix ist das filtern (hier : nach allen "modell-relevanten") einfacher, gleiches gilt für andere "Verkehrsmittel".
2) Keine neuen Werte (pro "Verkehrsmittel") erfinden, sondern die "angestammten" weiter verwenden. Also hier *=runway

aeroway:model_aerodrome könnte im suffix natürlich auch nur "model", "aeromodeling" o.ä. heissen, "model_aerodrome" ist aber derzeit der "etabierte" Ausdruck
commented by Im Fokus (2025-07-21 21:21:30+00:00): danke zunächst mal für Deinen Beitrag. 

Was mich irritiert ist, dass Du mehrfach von "suffix" unter Bezugnahme auf "model" schreibst, da dieser Wortbestandteil in "model_runway" oder "model_aerodrome" ja als Praefix fungiert.

Mit Filterung hab' ich allerdings nichts am Hut, insofern soll's mir recht sein, wenn Du wegen besserer Suchergebnisse auf einen der bisher weniger benutzten Schlüsselwerte wechselst.

Wolltest Du Dir mit diesem Hinweis einen Überblick über die Akzeptanz einer solchen Aktion verschaffen? Bisher hat außer mir leider niemand reagiert (was leider häufig passiert)
commented by ti-lo (2025-07-22 14:07:06+00:00): Ganz genau, wollte die Auseinandersetzung mit dem Thema in der "Praxis" erreichen anstatt über Theoretiker-Runden. Mein Hauptinteresse sind die "anderen Verkehrsmittel". Dort wurde die Differenzierung notwendig aufgrund der Verwendung z.B. von aeroway=launchpad für Ballons, Hobby- oder Forschungsraketen
commented by ti-lo (2025-07-22 14:13:49+00:00): Beim WERT spricht man nicht von "prefix/suffix", Bsp. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/aeroway=model_runway, nur beim "Schlüssel" (die Angaben vor dem =) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namespace
commented by Im Fokus (2025-07-24 21:52:26+00:00): Na, dann toi, toi, toi, dass sich noch ein paar Leute hier äußern.
commented by Im Fokus (2026-02-24 11:45:51+00:00): Still ruht der See.
Deshalb die Frage: muss dieser Hinweis weiter bestehen bleiben?
closed by Im Fokus (2026-04-10 23:30:03+00:00): Wie heißt es so treffend:
Keine Antwort ist auch eine Antwort.

Deshalb nach mehr als einem Jahr ohne weiteren Beitrag zu diesem Thema: un finale amichevole
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:27:29+00:00): Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Modelle
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:27:51+00:00): Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Modelle
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:28:14+00:00): Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Modelle
closed by Hedaja (2025-04-27 09:23:00+00:00): bisher ist aeroway=model_runway deutlich weiter verbreitet (742x) als aeroway:model_aerodrome=runway (12x)
Ich glaube eine Notiz auf der Karte ist für eine solche Diskussion eher ungeünsitg. Am besten im Forum anbringen, dann könnte man vllt ein allgemeines umtaggen anstreben.
commented by ti-lo (2025-04-27 12:58:16+00:00): Damit es nochmal eine Dekade dauert ? Ich halte "voting with the feet" für sinnvoller. Wurde das eigentlich im Forum adressiert ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atower%3Atype%3Danchor
opened by amnmalik (2025-04-04 03:28:57+00:00): another trail going right
opened by amnmalik (2025-04-04 03:28:58+00:00): trail going to the left
closed by Kamal Kathari (2026-05-12 13:41:16+00:00): Marked.
opened by amnmalik (2025-04-04 03:28:59+00:00): probably towards bara shil
opened by amnmalik (2025-04-04 03:29:01+00:00): shelter
closed by Kamal Kathari (2025-04-13 07:43:29+00:00): Added.
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:29:02+00:00): Wurde nie "ausdiskutiert" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, es gäbe aber einen neuen Namensraum : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:aeroway#Modelle
closed by Michael_H (2025-05-29 16:04:06+00:00): Das Proposal steht auf "abandoned". Es ist also abgeschlossen. Das aktuelle Tagging folgt einem Schema mit "Status: de facto". Es ist also alles bestmöglich kartiert.
opened by amnmalik (2025-04-04 03:29:03+00:00): spring
closed by Kamal Kathari (2025-04-13 07:43:09+00:00): Added,
opened by amnmalik (2025-04-04 03:29:04+00:00): spring
closed by Kamal Kathari (2025-04-13 07:42:36+00:00): Added.
opened by amnmalik (2025-04-04 03:29:05+00:00): camping spoti
closed by Kamal Kathari (2025-04-13 07:42:18+00:00): Added.
opened by Rieez (2025-04-04 03:29:11+00:00): Steps

via StreetComplete 60.3

GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Rieez/traces/11949005
closed by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-07 16:58:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4694949
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:30:59+00:00): 2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
opened by Rieez (2025-04-04 03:31:17+00:00): Steps

via StreetComplete 60.3

GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Rieez/traces/11949006
opened by Rieez (2025-04-04 03:31:19+00:00): Steps

via StreetComplete 60.3

GPS Trace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Rieez/traces/11949007
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:31:20+00:00): 2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
closed by Hypsometric (2026-01-15 17:26:56+00:00): It is already mapped correctly if it is still in use as a place for model airplanes.
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:32:01+00:00): 2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
closed by dannmer (2025-07-29 10:03:50+00:00): updated
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:32:21+00:00): 2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
commented by mendromance8f (2025-12-16 23:16:17+00:00): Is there anything that need to be done here?
commented by Matija Nalis (2025-12-18 03:50:11+00:00): There seems to something on the ground looking at aerial photos, but I'm not sure if that is "model aerodrome", it seems too big for that. Someone with local knowledge would know better...

Also note that user opening this note is blocked for their strange ideas and failure to cooperate: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ti-lo/blocks
closed by mendromance8f (2025-12-18 10:22:41+00:00): Updated website and tags as shown in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dmodel_aerodrome

The club's website confirms that this is a model airplane field
opened by Obanazawa Kuri (2025-04-04 03:32:30+00:00): 瓦渣岗

via StreetComplete 60.3

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/269197.jpg
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:33:12+00:00): 2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
opened by  (2025-04-04 03:33:32+00:00): Hier ist ein Neubau per Luftbild sichtbar, auch im Geoportal schon enthalten?
closed by Berlin53 (2025-04-16 12:24:35+00:00): done
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:34:30+00:00): 2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
commented by kaleidoscopica (2025-09-07 20:16:53+00:00): To be clear, since I've been looking at the two links and I'm still confused - what is the specific suggested tag to replace sport=model_aerodrome? 

I'm a bit wary of changing tags I know little about that do have de facto status (per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dmodel_aerodrome).
closed by mendromance8f (2025-12-18 10:32:07+00:00): Appears to be mapped appropriately
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:35:13+00:00): 2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:35:32+00:00): 2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
opened by ti-lo (2025-04-04 03:36:04+00:00): 2008 discussion abandoned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Model_Aerodrome, new namespace: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aeroway#Models
closed by Kanenas (2025-04-21 00:21:25+00:00): Seems like this is already the case. Marked as resolved. Put a new note if you meant something else.
commented by ti-lo (2025-04-21 00:27:19+00:00): It's about the "details" like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366542288. With the namespace, you may simply call it like the "real ones" (value), but put the "suffix" behind "aeroway". No need to "invent" an individual syntax
commented by Kanenas (2025-04-21 00:31:39+00:00): So, what is missing is the tag aeroway:model_aerodrome=runway from the long way?
commented by ti-lo (2025-04-21 00:39:43+00:00): In the above example, it would be called aeroway:model_aerodrome=taxiway , just like the "real ones"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dtaxiway . So there's no need to "invent values from scratch" (the "job" is done by the suffix instead). There's a similar problem especially for "launchpad", therefore the "standardisation" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aaeroway%3Dlaunchpad#Similar_tags