piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
opened by AktivgegenMüll (2025-06-16 15:28:04+00:00): "Ist eine Pension mit dem Namen Mühlenhof, Mühlrsd vorhanden, mehr nicht"
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2025-05-11T16:17:16Z
POI name: Mühle
POI types: tourism-attraction
 #organicmaps android
closed by mama we (2026-05-09 08:17:32+00:00): Mühlenrad noch vorhanden, abe mehr Show als Nutzen! Daher mach ich das mal zu!
opened by olafk (2025-06-16 15:30:37+00:00): In context of overlay "Buildings" – house number 28: Building – https://osm.org/way/197032503 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Baugrube.
opened by -=|MisterY|=- (2025-06-16 15:30:47+00:00): path

#OsmAnd
closed by -=|MisterY|=- (2025-06-16 15:33:34+00:00): added
opened by NewTown101 (2025-06-16 15:31:39+00:00): Adresse correcte: Le Lesseps, 39 Avenue des Arènes de Cimiez
opened by gszkr (2025-06-16 15:32:19+00:00): Gołębia i Jagiellońska mają ten sam charakter. Nie jest to deptak, bo nie jest przewidziany tylko dla pieszych - samochody UJ mogą się poruszać, jest to teren UJ. Zgodnie z oznaczeniem dla całego Starego Miasta są to drogi w strefie zamieszkania.  Zdjęcie z wjazdu w Gołębią.

via StreetComplete 61.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284867.jpg
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-19 08:37:04+00:00): > Nie jest to deptak, bo nie jest przewidziany tylko dla pieszych - samochody UJ mogą się poruszać, jest to teren UJ

deptak może mieć bardzo ograniczony ruch samochodów, na przykład pojazdy ekip opróżniających kosze

tu ruch jest na tyle ograniczony że deptak wydaje mi się być uzasadniony
commented by uprkos (2025-06-25 18:50:34+00:00): Jaaka decyzja?
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-26 05:34:42+00:00): gszkr - zgadzasz się z moim komentarzem?

Jak nie to daj znać, jak tak to można zamknąć
commented by gszkr (2025-06-26 11:23:43+00:00): Przede wszystkim jest tu niespójność. Bo z jednej strony mamy Gołębią i część Jagiellońskiej, które są oznaczone jako deptak, ale druga część Jagiellońskiej w kierunku Plant oraz Karola Olszewskiego są zwykłymi drogami w strefie zamieszkania. To byłoby uzasadnione, gdyby odcinki obecnie oznakowane jako deptaki spełniały "funkcje centrum handlowego i gastronomicznego, niekiedy kulturalnego". A tu tak nie jest. Jeszcze większym kuriozum jak dla mnie jest Rynek Główny, gdzie jezdnia dookoła jest drogą w strefie zamieszkania, połączoną drogą z ... deptakiem Plac Mariacki oraz odcinkami deptaków do dróg Szczepańska, Świętej Anny/Wiślna, Bracka i Świetego Jana. Wydaje mi się, że w obszarze Starego Miasta jako deptak powinny pozostać Floriańska, Szewska i Grodzka, ewentualnie jeszcze Sławkowska. Z dalszych Stolarska i Sienna od Rynku Głównego do Małego Rynku plus Mały Rynek - na nich jest intensywny ruch pieszych oraz spełaniają te funkcje, które wskazałem powyżej (wg defnicji Wikipedii).
commented by gszkr (2025-06-26 11:28:43+00:00): A, oczywiście jeszcze Pijarska - nad Senacką i Kanoniczą też bym się zstanowił, czy jednak nie ulica w strefie zamieszkania.
commented by uprkos (2025-07-02 19:42:56+00:00): Ulice wymienione przez przedmówcę zgadzają się moim zdaniem ze zdroworozsądkowym rozumieniem deptaka - na których co do zasady na co dzień nie ma żadnych samochodów, a piesi intensywnie depczą. Też zastanawiam się nad Sławkowską, myślę że ujdzie. Rynek też oznaczyłbym jako deptak, bo to logiczne - rozumiem że formalnie to strefa zamieszkania, ale wraz ze wszystkimi zakazami wjazdu pod spodem jest to po prostu deptak.
commented by uprkos (2025-07-08 18:10:57+00:00): Czy są jakieś zażalenia czy Jagiellońską i Gołębią można oddeptakować?
commented by kubahahaha (2025-07-08 21:42:39+00:00): Podrzucę jeszcze mapkę z lokalizacją znaków od UM Krakowa

https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1NlH-VbeBqdyei7IrSb4KFEwg-Sg&ll=50.06622342403261%2C19.93093056702878&z=13
commented by kubahahaha (2025-07-08 21:45:06+00:00): > Czy są jakieś zażalenia czy Jagiellońską i Gołębią można oddeptakować?

Moim zdaniem tak, ale przydało by się w ogóle zrobić przegląd ulic w obrębie plant
closed by uprkos (2025-07-14 19:56:00+00:00): Poprawiłem. Oczywiście nadal można przejrzeć pozostałe ulice.
opened by NewTown101 (2025-06-16 15:33:56+00:00): Adresse correcte: Le Lesseps, 39 avenue des Arènes de Cimiez
closed by divulmappeur (2025-09-13 12:37:10+00:00): merci, corrigé : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171873348
opened by RGerlach (2025-06-16 15:34:02+00:00): Das Ortsschild steht schon hier der Bereich danach ist nicht mehr Innerorts
closed by wermak (2026-01-28 16:17:46+00:00): Korrigiert, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472009230.
opened by Scholli_der_echte (2025-06-16 15:34:31+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Underground Fire Hydrant – https://osm.org/node/12919559137 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Doppelt eingetragen
closed by wermak (2025-08-13 16:53:15+00:00): Entfernt.
opened by nixetus (2025-06-16 15:34:32+00:00): "Дополнил информацию "
OSM snapshot date: 2025-06-08T00:18:23Z
POI name: У опушки
POI types: amenity-cafe
 #organicmaps ios
closed by literan (2025-06-16 19:22:16+00:00): отлично, заметку закрываю
opened by nixetus (2025-06-16 15:36:17+00:00): "Дополнил информацию "
OSM snapshot date: 2025-06-08T00:18:23Z
POI name: У опушки
POI types: amenity-cafe
 #organicmaps ios
opened by nixetus (2025-06-16 15:36:18+00:00): "Велопарка у кафе"
OSM snapshot date: 2025-06-08T00:18:23Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-bicycle_parking
 #organicmaps ios
closed by literan (2025-06-16 19:22:26+00:00): велопарковка уже отмечена на карте
opened by Vovoka (2025-06-16 15:37:36+00:00): Playground "Slåttaholen-Mjolkerampa Aktivitetspark"

via StreetComplete 61.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284868.jpg
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284869.jpg
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284870.jpg
commented by Oskarst_ (2025-06-20 07:58:31+00:00): Thanks for the useful pictures - is the southern part built as well?
commented by Vovoka (2025-06-20 09:36:02+00:00): The southern part ist currently being built. You see that on the third photo (284870).
opened by Geovelo_Notes (2025-06-16 15:39:16+00:00): il n'y a pas de piste cyclable ici, c'est un chemi de champ. La piste cyclable est probablement de l'autre côté de la rivière, or il n'y a pas de passage ici (This note has been created from Geovelo: https://amenagements-cyclables.fr/fr/contributions/95674)
commented by Geovelo_Notes (2025-07-25 13:46:11+00:00): Un commentaire a été ajouté par un cycliste Geovelo : "Bonjour, on a requalifié le chemin pour être moins favorisé à l'usage du vélo. 
Cyclablement,"
opened by  (2025-06-16 15:39:24+00:00): Die Wohngebietsstraßen parallel zur Gothaer Str. 56 - 66, Suhler Str. und Alte Hellersdorfer Str. 35 - 41 in 12629 Berlin sind Strassen in einer Tempo 30 Zone. Betrifft hier aber auch alle anderen Wohngebietsstraßen.
Tauchen hier aber noch als Tempo 10 Zone auf, z.B. in der ADAC Fahr + Spar App. Werden hier mit falschen Geschwindigkeitswerten 30 km/h statt 10 km/h berechnet.
Bitte korrigieren. 
Danke !
U. J.
commented by Strange Kind Woman (2025-06-16 15:55:31+00:00): Ein kleiner Fehler hat sich eingeschlichen. 
In der ADAC Fahr + Spar App werden 10 km/h statt der richtigen 30 km/h in den angegebenen Wohngebietsstraßen  Zone 30 berechnet !
commented by StefanHRT (2025-07-21 03:19:22+00:00): Das sind ausgewiesene Privatstraßen, welche der dort ansässigen Wohnungsbaugesellschaft gehören. Beschilderung 10km/h. Ist in Hellersdorf keine Seltenheit, bzw. wird es sogar mit der Zeit immer mehr. Fotobeispiel https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/stefanhrt?lat=52.534903499972&lng=13.5911097&z=19.132633501089256&menu=false&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&focus=photo&pKey=564956915414940&x=0.5678053947145532&y=0.5324220413905428&zoom=0.049069312310988045
opened by user_21613747 (2025-06-16 15:39:51+00:00): 제39보병여단 2대대
opened by  (2025-06-16 15:40:11+00:00): Красное Белое
opened by  (2025-06-16 15:40:58+00:00): Z á h u m e n i c e
opened by Pekka from Cambridge (2025-06-16 15:41:38+00:00): Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – Coredan Ltd (Corporate Office) – https://osm.org/node/3788748230 via StreetComplete 60.3:

Part of RP Fitness now

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284871.jpg
closed by PinkBear (2026-06-24 09:37:53+00:00): fixed
opened by  (2025-06-16 15:41:49+00:00): Hier ist jetzt wieder Tempo 50
closed by Christopher (2025-09-26 15:32:31+00:00): Straße ist aktuell bis Ende 2026 Baustelle. Dannach muss sie neu getaggt werden.
opened by Markus REK (2025-06-16 15:42:10+00:00): Unable to answer "How is this power line attached?" – Power Pole – https://osm.org/node/1540621356 via StreetComplete 61.0:

Existiert nicht mehr
opened by  (2025-06-16 15:42:38+00:00): the spring is drinkable water
closed by Tiberiu Popescu (2026-03-01 06:18:15+00:00): The spring is already tagged with drinking_water=yes.
opened by  (2025-06-16 15:44:04+00:00): good spring
closed by one_electro_dan (2026-05-05 14:14:12+00:00): Closing this note because it doesn't contain enough information.
opened by Geovelo_Notes (2025-06-16 15:44:05+00:00): Nnnnnnn nnnn (This note has been created from Geovelo: https://amenagements-cyclables.fr/fr/contributions/95675)
opened by Pookave (2025-06-16 15:46:18+00:00): Pas de batiment
#self

via StreetComplete_ee 60.2

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284874.jpg
closed by Pookave (2025-06-17 05:02:07+00:00): bâtiments supprimés
opened by empty_child (2025-06-16 15:48:49+00:00): храм?

#EveryDoor
closed by yelisey90 (2025-09-08 21:18:59+00:00): Ну по форме крыши похож, но думаю, не только храмы так строят. А по виду вообще не похож, храмы не делают настолько большими в поперечной оси, да и вон электрический кабель прям в окно второго этажа заходит.... Здание нарисовал
opened by Mike409 (2025-06-16 15:49:03+00:00): ATM operator is : "Emirates NBD" and ATM:fee==no

#OsmAnd
opened by Michele Carignani (2025-06-16 15:50:15+00:00): Unable to answer "Are the pickup times of this collection box still correct?" – Poste Italiane (Mail Drop Box) – https://osm.org/node/10830097356 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Rimossa

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284876.jpg
closed by Martinligabue (2025-06-16 17:45:16+00:00): thanks
opened by Geovelo_Notes (2025-06-16 15:51:20+00:00): escalier trop raide pour un vélo électrique dont le poids excède 20 kilos (This note has been created from Geovelo: https://amenagements-cyclables.fr/fr/contributions/95676)
closed by K12230LF (2025-07-07 22:35:01+00:00): Il n'y a malheureusement rien qui permette de tagguer le poids maximal de votre vélo pour les escaliers, ni la raideur des esacliers.
opened by Axel Karjalainen (2025-06-16 15:51:46+00:00): "150 kW"
OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-charging_station
 #organicmaps android
opened by RoseOrRobot (2025-06-16 15:52:20+00:00): "Container for Clothes, Shoes"
OSM snapshot date: 2025-05-11T16:17:16Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-recycling-container
 #organicmaps android
closed by berndw (2025-06-17 07:44:28+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4808340
opened by Clonkonaut (2025-06-16 15:52:44+00:00): Unable to answer "What’s the name of this street?" – Residential Road – https://osm.org/way/784147671 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Road appears to be gone
opened by ymblanter (2025-06-16 15:54:56+00:00): Ik weet niet waar die naam "Leidschenveen Centrum" vandaan komt, op het station staat gewoon "Leidschenveen".
commented by ymblanter (2025-06-16 15:55:33+00:00): Ik bedoel tram/bus halte.
commented by A67-A67 (2025-06-16 16:19:42+00:00): De HTM denkt daar anders over: https://www.htm.nl/haltes/leidschenveen-centrum/
commented by ymblanter (2025-06-16 17:43:47+00:00): Ik zie het. Dat is mijn foto van zaterdag: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/The_Hague_Leidschenveen_tram_stop_seen_from_the_southwest.jpg Kennelijk is de naam op de boord "Leinschenveen Centrum" en op het electronisch boord "Leidschenveen". We moeten waarschijnlijk allebei behouden.
commented by A67-A67 (2025-06-22 13:08:35+00:00): Ik denk dat de volgende tagging het meest correct is:
- name=Leidschenveen Centrum
- alt_name=Leidschenveen
commented by ymblanter (2025-06-22 13:54:11+00:00): Ja, dat is wat mij betreft prima.
closed by A67-A67 (2025-06-24 18:56:25+00:00): Ik heb de alt_name toegevoegd.
opened by olecky (2025-06-16 15:55:49+00:00): In context of overlay "Surfaces" – Dzirnavu iela (Residential Road) – https://osm.org/way/1395764278 via StreetComplete 61.1:

One way westward
closed by olecky (2025-06-19 12:44:53+00:00): updated with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167824864
opened by olecky (2025-06-16 15:55:50+00:00): In context of overlay "Surfaces" – Dzirnavu iela (Residential Road) – https://osm.org/way/1395764279 via StreetComplete 61.1:

One way westward
closed by olecky (2025-06-19 12:44:44+00:00): updated: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167824864
opened by olecky (2025-06-16 15:55:52+00:00): Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Marked Crossing – https://osm.org/way/1184049587 via StreetComplete 61.1:

No crossing here

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284877.jpg
closed by HellMap (2025-06-19 08:55:12+00:00): Resolved by https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4812059.
opened by olecky (2025-06-16 15:55:52+00:00): In context of overlay "Surfaces" – Pedestrian Area – https://osm.org/relation/16200129 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Not.really a pedestrian area
closed by Colbertson (2025-06-20 15:37:01+00:00): Removed
opened by mod22 (2025-06-16 15:55:53+00:00): In context of overlay "Addresses" – house number 2: Apartment Building – https://osm.org/way/51985691 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Number 2 is not the whole block, see photo

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284878.jpg
closed by liljaadeliina (2025-07-29 08:38:23+00:00): Edited the building to reflect that
opened by dmfr (2025-06-16 15:56:41+00:00): Mapear paineis solares individuais.
closed by DanielAgos (2025-08-26 23:03:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171053335
Foram adicionados a maior parte deles.

A parte em falta é uma secção que apenas aparece na imagem da ESRI e contém alguma distorção
closed by DressyPear4 (2025-09-18 18:11:37+00:00): Finalizado
opened by bhmaps (2025-06-16 15:57:00+00:00): Barriere ca 1,5m quer

via StreetComplete 61.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284879.jpg
opened by Paul Todd (2025-06-16 15:58:04+00:00): building demolished in bing
closed by ICT_maps (2025-11-09 23:47:39+00:00): removed
opened by bhmaps (2025-06-16 15:58:44+00:00): Unable to answer "What is the width of the opening here?" – on level -1: Cycle Barrier – https://osm.org/node/375768263 via StreetComplete 61.1:

variabel, ca 1m wenn geöffnet

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284880.jpg
opened by  (2025-06-16 15:59:28+00:00): Heritage Pavilion
closed by 022 (2025-08-02 16:40:18+00:00): name already exists
opened by  (2025-06-16 15:59:43+00:00): this is not a motorway
vandalism
opened by olafk (2025-06-16 16:01:54+00:00): Kreisverkehr wurde entfernt, ist jetzt normale Einmündung

via StreetComplete 61.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284881.jpg
closed by businessesMan (2025-07-22 00:52:54+00:00): Danke für das Foto, ich habe es in versucht passend zu erfassen. Gerne korrigieren und den Bürgersteig fortführen.
opened by mlbiche (2025-06-16 16:02:55+00:00): Je ne suis pas sûr de quelle manière ce chemin doit être référencé, mais il ne semble pas adapté pour les vélos. C'est un trottoir étroit (un trottoir ne doit pas être renseigné comme un chemin ?) le long du rond-point.
commented by LySioS (2025-06-18 16:19:05+00:00): Il est effectivement renseigné comme étant un chemin spécifique aux piétons et cyclistes.

C'est discutable en terme de pertinence d'aménagement, on est bien d'accord, mais ça reste la norme chez nous, donc c'est peut-être vrai...

Je vérifierai s'il y continuité cyclable au niveau du rond-point la prochaine fois que j'y passe, la partie Est jusqu'à décathlon étant correcte
commented by mlbiche (2025-06-20 06:44:19+00:00): Justement, ce chemin et celui sur la portion ouest de l'avenue André Tourné, ainsi que le chemin piéton en sens inverse ne correspondent qu'au trottoir.

À vélo, à la fin de la piste cyclable de la partie est jusqu'à Décathlon (qui est bien correcte), je rejoindrai la route pour emprunter le rond-point.

La cartographie de ce trottoir me surprend un peu :
- Aucun autre trottoir n'est cartographié le long des rues de ce quartier. Pourquoi celui-ci ?
- Visiblement, lorsqu'un trottoir est cartographié par un way, la rue doit être marquée avec le tag sidewalk=separate.
- Les trottoirs pourraient être indiqués directement sur le way Avenue André Tourné avec le tag sidelwalk=both

Je ne maîtrise pas très bien la cartographie des ways sur OpenStreetMap, je débute encore. Mais en lisant l'article du wiki dédié aux trottoirs (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Trottoirs) ainsi que la note associée (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR_talk:Trottoirs), ça ne me paraît pas évident que ces trottoirs aient leur pertinences ici. Cartographier seulement les passages piétons pour traverser le rond-point me paraît être une pratique beaucoup plus partagée ailleurs.

À voir ce qu'on peut faire ici. Quoi qu'il en soit, il reste la discussion de l'usage cyclable du trottoir, mais comme il n'est pas explicité par un panneau ou un marquage, je l'ai compris comme une erreur quand je suis passé ici.
commented by LySioS (2025-06-20 19:36:36+00:00): Ok, je comprends mieux.

J'ai laissé le tracé mais supprimé le côté cyclable en le qualifiant correctement de trottoir.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167886228#map=19/42.666372/2.893349&layers=N

Merci de ta vigilance. 

Je te laisse fermer la note si tu penses que c'est bon pour toi.

J'ai préféré laisser le tracer car c'est un niveau de détail très bon qui facilite le guidage piéton. Qualifier la présence de trottoirs sur le filaire routier est plus courant car plus simple, mais moins précis.
closed by mlbiche (2025-06-20 21:18:26+00:00): Parfait, merci beaucoup 👍️
opened by Andrew Chadwick (2025-06-16 16:03:46+00:00): Play Music Today, formerly Professional Music Technology, has gone into administration, and this store has closed:

https://www.pmtonline.co.uk/stores/oxford/ is now a redirect to an explanation

https://oxfordclarion.uk/clarion-weekly-13-june-2025/
opened by lukabułka (2025-06-16 16:08:56+00:00): układ torów i peronów do poprawy
closed by lukabułka (2025-07-25 13:40:27+00:00): poprawione
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169455404#map=17/51.143090/20.577349&layers=N
opened by Pekka from Cambridge (2025-06-16 16:12:52+00:00): Unable to answer "Are there sound signals for the blind here?" – Crossing – https://osm.org/node/12285718341 via StreetComplete 60.3:

It's not clear which traffic lights this refers to. There are none on the cycleway.
commented by Gil_ (2025-09-23 16:52:31+00:00): No, there aren't, or at least they are inaudalible/not working
commented by dressorc (2025-12-12 17:46:05+00:00): can confirm they are silent
opened by bhmaps (2025-06-16 16:13:00+00:00): Unable to answer "What type of bollard is this?" – Bollard – https://osm.org/node/3096592746 via StreetComplete 61.1:

sind 2 Poller herausnehmbar

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284882.jpg
opened by HellMap (2025-06-16 16:15:07+00:00): bus stop kemeri

#OsmAnd
opened by AntonioGio (2025-06-16 16:15:57+00:00): Da questa posizione comincia la via Virgilio che esiste su Google Maps ma non ancora su Open Maps.

via StreetComplete 61.1
opened by Pekka from Cambridge (2025-06-16 16:16:08+00:00): Unable to answer "Are there sound signals for the blind here?" – Crossing – https://osm.org/node/12285718320 via StreetComplete 60.3:

It's not clear which traffic lights this refers to. There are none on the cycleway

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284883.jpg
commented by Gil_ (2025-09-23 16:53:39+00:00): No
closed by PinkBear (2026-06-24 09:44:32+00:00): this is correct
opened by Liliã Batista (2025-06-16 16:17:07+00:00): Recolha de RSU na Igreja de "Sundy"
"..." Quando não está a Igreja identificada
opened by bhmaps (2025-06-16 16:17:12+00:00): Unable to answer "What type of bollard is this?" – Bollard – https://osm.org/node/419878636 via StreetComplete 61.1:

2Stück herausnehmbar

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284884.jpg
opened by bhmaps (2025-06-16 16:18:08+00:00): 2Poller herausnehmbar

via StreetComplete 61.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284885.jpg
opened by owiecc (2025-06-16 16:18:19+00:00): Affaldsø nr. 519
opened by Donall Ohartaigh (2025-06-16 16:20:16+00:00): Eastern Counties Paving

Unit 3, Kingsdale Business Centre, Regina Road Chelmsford Essex CM1 1PE United Kingdom

0800 280 0468

https://essexandsuffolkdriveways.co.uk/
info@essexandsuffolkdriveways.co.uk


Eastern Counties Paving is a trusted expert in premium outdoor surfacing and landscaping solutions throughout Essex and Suffolk. We offer a wide range of services, consisting of Block Paving Driveways, Tarmac Driveways, Resin Bound Driveways, and Imprinted Concrete Driveways, all expertly set up to boost your property's appearance and value. Our skilled Landscapers additionally offer tailored Patios, durable Fencing, and reliable Surface Dressing for driveways and roads. We likewise provide specialist Jet Washing to restore surfaces to their original condition. Whether you're enhancing a home or a commercial property, our workmanship and attention to detail are second to none.
opened by b-unicycling (2025-06-16 16:20:57+00:00): 3.36m

#EveryDoor
opened by SoulCover (2025-06-16 16:21:02+00:00): Ist Garage ohne angeschriebene Hausnummer. Laut Nachbarin ist das aber eigenes Grundstück mit Nr. 6, wird aber von Nr. 4 genutzt.

via StreetComplete_ee 61.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284886.jpg
closed by cuzi (2025-07-10 10:05:16+00:00): Danke, geändert.
opened by SoulCover (2025-06-16 16:21:03+00:00): Unable to answer "FixMe:" – house number 8: Garage – https://osm.org/way/245027520 via StreetComplete_ee 61.1:

Zwei Einzelgaragen. Rechts mit #8 wird von Wiesenweg 7 genutzt, links gehört zu #10. Quelle: Bewohnerin.

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284887.jpg
closed by cuzi (2025-07-10 10:05:19+00:00): Danke, geändert.
opened by SoulCover (2025-06-16 16:21:03+00:00): Unable to answer "FixMe:" – house number 13: Garage – https://osm.org/way/239491143 via StreetComplete_ee 61.1:

Garage gehört zu #15. Evtl. auf eigenem Grundstück #13 wie weiter oben?

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284888.jpg
closed by cuzi (2025-07-10 10:05:11+00:00): Danke, geändert.
opened by SoulCover (2025-06-16 16:21:04+00:00): Neues Haus #5

via StreetComplete_ee 61.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/284889.jpg
closed by cuzi (2025-07-10 10:16:24+00:00): eingetragen
opened by shtrophic (2025-06-16 16:21:23+00:00): In context of overlay "Places" – AndroCars (Car Dealership) – https://osm.org/node/715686279 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Existiert nicht mehr
closed by mapl (2026-06-02 06:57:25+00:00): Vor Ort verifiziert und gelöscht.
opened by DerKaiserschmarren (2025-06-16 16:21:45+00:00): Linksabbiegespur wohl länger gesperrt (Survey heute)
closed by DerKaiserschmarren (2025-06-17 12:31:11+00:00): Falsche Kreuzung - und nicht wirklich relevant. wurde teilweise freigegeben - betraf die Lichtensteinstraße
opened by Liliã Batista (2025-06-16 16:22:15+00:00): Recolha de RSU na Igreja Evangélica de Santo António
opened by DerKaiserschmarren (2025-06-16 16:22:36+00:00): Ersatzhaltestelle Hörlgasse 40A Richtung Döblinger Friedhof
bis September
https://www.wienmobil.at/en/lines/line/busCity/40A/H/04/Wiener%20Linien/timetable/H/vao:490150900/busCity/2/40A/detail/wienerliniendds:news_4115?showFirstLast=true&planDate=2025-06-09T22:00:00Z
commented by derloris (2025-06-17 11:26:52+00:00): Ja, ist hier (auf der Hauptfahrbahn). Da das aber nur temporär über den Sommer geht, wäre das Einzeichnen eher unüblich, was meinst du?
commented by DerKaiserschmarren (2025-06-17 12:29:30+00:00): Stimmt. 4 Wochen sind nicht wirklich lange. Dann resolve ich das andere auch gleich mal: das ist: