piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
commented by walley (2025-08-19 07:08:46+00:00): yes
https://www.azd.cz/cs/kontakty-spolecnosti/montazni-zavod-olomouc-mzo
opened by  (2025-06-04 10:33:22+00:00): Gedicht op muur
opened by  (2025-06-04 10:34:18+00:00): onosm.org submitted note from a business:
Name: LynxLGS Architecture Outsourcing Services
addr:street=Riverwood Pkwy
addr:city=Atlanta
addr:postcode=30339
Phone number: (678) 389-9931
Website: https://www.lynxlgs.com/
Social Network: https://www.facebook.com/lynxpros
Opening Hours: 9 to 5 pm Monday-Friday
Category: Architects
Description: Lynx provides outsourced architecture, drafting, interior design, and engineering solutions as well as BIM and construction documentation. Our certified and dedicated teams focus on quality and efficiency to meet your deadlines. Approachable, native English communicators and 24/7 service facilitate collaborative workflows and ensure adherence to guidelines with necessary changes quickly implemented. Proficient in Revit, AutoCAD, 3D Studio MAX, Google Sketchup, 2020, CabinetVision, and Vertex and other specialty software, our teams can master your project's unique software demands. With years of experience working for leading architects, engineers, designers and developers, we strive to offer cost-effective solutions that exceed expectations ARCHITECTURE: The key to great architecture is capturing the essence of space. Understanding the architectural process, with the assistance of Lynx experts, will help design homes, resort, office space, retail, industrial and commercial property ​ Why Lynx Professional Services? ​ Skilled and internationally experienced architects Excellent knowledge of Sketch Up, Revit, and CAD Software From conceptual design through to the final design Plans amended for refurbishing, alterations, and renovating existing buildings Project management, design consulting, 3D modeling and graphic representations Plans completed on time to the standards and requirements of the customer
Accepted payment methods:
commented by bdentremont (2025-06-04 22:06:38+00:00): This note as well as website and social media accounts fail to provide a house or unit number which would allow this information to be verified, as is practice for anonymously provided information.
closed by dannmer (2025-07-18 19:11:24+00:00): looks like spam
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:34:19+00:00): name=Kalklöcher 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/441072075/history

what is it? name of meadow? something that should be deleted? name of locality? something else?
opened by  (2025-06-04 10:34:38+00:00): Une grosse mare d'eau rend impraticable en vélo ce  chemin.
opened by ping-a-ping (2025-06-04 10:34:59+00:00): What is this darker green line supposed to show/represent? In reality, there is a row of small trees, but there are other bigger trees on the property that are not shown so this line does not make sense.
closed by A67-A67 (2025-06-04 17:35:28+00:00): It's a tree row, so it corresponds to the row of small trees you mention. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/734998936
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:35:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/469802561/history

Gazeta Lubawska jest tu w jakiejś formie jak biuro?
opened by sarimc (2025-06-04 10:35:41+00:00): "Nando's Caroline Springs"
POI name: Nando's Caroline Springs
POI types: amenity-restaurant cuisine-portuguese
OSM data version: 2025-03-18T16:35:26Z
 #mapsme
closed by NeisBot (2025-06-28 15:53:28+00:00): Hi sarimc,
Thank you for your contribution! 

I've reviewed OSM and noticed that the following element already exists: 
"Nando's Caroline Springs" (amenity=restaurant)
https://osm.org/node/12886458801

Due to this, I'm closing this note now. 

If you have further details to share or if you'd like to reopen the note in the future, feel free to do so.

#AlreadyMapped #Closing
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:35:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/470315776/history 

name=Gasverteilerstation

what is this named object representing?

named crossing?

tagging debris?
closed by BrummsLee (2025-09-27 11:58:24+00:00): Makes no sense here. Name removed. Thanks.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:36:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/474362755/history ma tylko name=658 - ma ktoś pomysł co to może znaczyć? Czy kasujemy jako pozbawione wartości?
closed by JakubS (2025-06-06 08:04:15+00:00): Tag name nie ma znaczenia i jest zbędny, usunąłem.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:36:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/474733749/history ma tylko name=1151 - ma ktoś pomysł co to może znaczyć? Czy kasujemy jako pozbawione wartości?
closed by JakubS (2025-06-06 08:01:49+00:00): Widzę, że to ja pierwotnie dodałem ten węzeł i name=1151. Nie przypominam sobie, żeby to miało jakieś znaczenie, zapewne ten tag znalazł się tam przypadkowo, dlatego usunąłem go z węzła.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:36:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/492956759/history ma tylko name=Oderwa - ma ktoś pomysł co to może znaczyć? Czy kasujemy jako pozbawione wartości?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:37:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/509709194/history

chyba do skasowania jako pewnie padły kiosk ruchu?
closed by almo53 (2025-08-27 16:26:54+00:00): usunąłem - oficjalnie pod koniec roku 2024 wszystkie kioski ruch zostały zlikwidowane
opened by massic80 (2025-06-04 10:37:29+00:00): Questo segmento è Corso Galileo Galilei
closed by EdoBoo (2025-12-19 15:02:32+00:00): Sistemata.
opened by Geovelo_Notes (2025-06-04 10:38:15+00:00): Pompe à vélo : pompe de station service, payante 😡 (This note has been created from Geovelo: https://amenagements-cyclables.fr/fr/contributions/94466)
commented by Geovelo_Notes (2025-06-26 14:10:24+00:00): Un commentaire a été ajouté par un cycliste Geovelo : "Bonjour, sur les dernières images disponible il semble que la station de gonflage est destinée aux voitures. Pouvez-vous confirmer qu'il y a une pompe pour les vélo ?"
commented by Geovelo_Notes (2025-08-26 09:35:27+00:00): Un commentaire a été ajouté par un cycliste Geovelo : "Bonjour, En l'absence de réponse de l'utilisateur Geovelo, ce signalement à été clôturé."
opened by miscosm (2025-06-04 10:39:46+00:00): Neue Fahrradstraße
https://www.schwaebische.de/regional/tuttlingen/tuttlingen/die-rote-strasse-hat-viele-fans-doch-eine-stelle-bereitet-sorgen-3620344
closed by Geo-Tobi (2026-03-09 20:01:31+00:00): OK, umgesetzt. Danke
opened by  (2025-06-04 10:39:52+00:00): Un grosse mare rend impraticable en vélo ce chemin
commented by MXC48 (2026-04-01 19:41:14+00:00): vous voulez dire une flac d'eau momentanée ou un nouvel écosystème qui barre la route ?
opened by  (2025-06-04 10:40:17+00:00): Dereköy Sınır Kapsıı
closed by Dimitar155 (2025-09-12 05:46:29+00:00): added
opened by  (2025-06-04 10:40:27+00:00): Centar za socijalni rad Medveđa
opened by fabiotofy (2025-06-04 10:41:54+00:00): Nuova Villetta Senza civico ?
closed by fabiotofy (2025-07-08 13:30:02+00:00): visibile da strada affisso il numero 24
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:43:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/529115979/history ma tylko name=Kolonia Miłaczewek - ma ktoś pomysł co to może znaczyć? Czy kasujemy jako pozbawione wartości?
closed by JeroMack | Yanosik (2025-08-05 14:44:36+00:00): Pewnie nazwa z jakichś staryszych map, natomiast na BDOT-cie nic nie ma, na moje do usunięcia. Żadnych znaków z nazwą w 2022 nie było. 

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.94338041518722&lng=18.423958586032768&z=14.517318340900603&focus=map
commented by uprkos (2025-12-09 20:59:50+00:00): Dodany tag w międzyczasie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174949136
opened by Schübel-Auer (2025-06-04 10:43:01+00:00): "Hier ist kein Durchgang zur Kahlenberger Straße.￼"
OSM snapshot date: 2025-05-11T16:17:16Z
POI has no name
POI types: barrier-gate
 #organicmaps ios
closed by derloris (2025-06-04 11:13:39+00:00): Hinweis redundant zu Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4789545
reopened by Schübel-Auer (2025-06-04 18:31:38+00:00): Verstehe ich nicht, warum redutant. 
Es gibt zwei Eingänge von verschiedenen Strassen.
Einmal wollen die Leute von der Kahlenbergerstraße zur Zahnradbahnstraße durch unser Lokal beziehungsweise Grundstück durchgehen, erster Eingang.
Oder vom zweiten Eingang Zahnradbahn Straße durch unser Lokal beziehungsweise Grundstück durchgehen, zur Kahlenberger Straße.
dies ist ein Privatgrundstück und kein öffentlicher Grund
commented by derloris (2025-06-04 20:04:27+00:00): Ad redundant: Es wurden anfangs vier Hinweise platziert, zwei pro Seite, daher war mindestens je einer redundant.

Ad Privatgrundstück: Als solches (Zaun und Weg mit access=private) ist es auch seit 14 Jahren in OpenStreetMap eingetragen. Es ist hier kein öffentlich benutzbarer Durchgang eingetragen.
closed by Schübel-Auer (2025-06-04 20:28:55+00:00): Ok Danke
opened by Schübel-Auer (2025-06-04 10:43:01+00:00): "Hier ist kein Durchgang zur Zahnradbahn Straße Beethoven Gang ￼"
OSM snapshot date: 2025-05-11T16:17:16Z
POI has no name
POI types: building-address
 #organicmaps ios
closed by derloris (2025-06-04 11:17:28+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, aber der entsprechende Weg ist ohnehin ist seit 14 Jahren nur mit access=private eingezeichnet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124916426
opened by mcg 🍻︎ (2025-06-04 10:43:22+00:00): Mittwoch Ruhetag

#OsmAnd
closed by Taktaal (2025-06-29 13:12:42+00:00): habe das gesetzt
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:43:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/544264848/history ma tylko name=Snieżnica - ma ktoś pomysł co to może znaczyć? Czy kasujemy jako pozbawione wartości?
commented by sjodl_ (2025-06-05 15:35:16+00:00): Ja bym skasował. Bardzo stary edit, pewnie chodziło o nieformalną nazwę kompleksu narciarskiego, może ewentualnie o okolice góry Śnieżnicy.
closed by sjodl_ (2025-06-11 19:38:03+00:00): Usunąłem.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:43:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/567889358/history ma tylko name=Głaz Thomasa - ma ktoś pomysł co to może znaczyć? Czy kasujemy jako pozbawione wartości?
closed by Przemysław69 (2025-11-13 16:05:17+00:00): Done: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/567889358/history/2

Uzupełniłem tagi i dodałem krótki "description".
opened by Moneer Lubbad (2025-06-04 10:44:45+00:00): Evacuated area
opened by Takuto (2025-06-04 10:44:48+00:00): Есть сомнения, где дом 19, а где 19А. На ЯП табличек нет. есть только вывеска стоматологии на этом здании, где указан адрес "19А".
opened by Takuto (2025-06-04 10:44:48+00:00): Знак "Движение запрещено" со стрелкой направо с Советской на Октябрьскую и табличкой с 8 до 14 часов
closed by Takuto (2025-06-04 14:13:16+00:00): Поставил тэг access:conditional на кусок Октябрьской площади ограниченной этими знаками
opened by Takuto (2025-06-04 10:44:49+00:00): Где-то потерялся дом Советская, 33
opened by Kuiperonline (2025-06-04 10:45:13+00:00): gate
opened by fabiotofy (2025-06-04 10:45:18+00:00): casa senza civico ?
closed by fabiotofy (2025-07-08 13:27:54+00:00): visibile da strada affisso il numero 16
opened by halibutwig (2025-06-04 10:45:27+00:00): Unable to answer "What type of tourist information is this?" – Information – https://osm.org/node/10884632833 via StreetComplete 61.0:

C'est la réception du village vacances Mileade. Je ne sais pas dans quelle catégorie classer ça
opened by Mammi71 (2025-06-04 10:45:33+00:00): In langer Feldweg mitten durch ein (Neubau-) Wohngebiet mit access=no klingt unwahrscheinlich. Vmtl. inzwischen residential o.ä. und (motor_)vehicle=no
commented by Mammi71 (2025-12-02 07:54:08+00:00): inzwischen foot=yes, bicycle=yes, motor_vehicle=private und access=private. ob es tatsächlich private ist kann ich nicht prüfen, aber zumindest das access=private ist zu viel des guten und steht im Widerspruch zu foot/bicycle=yes
closed by wermak (2025-12-18 13:16:02+00:00): Access=private entfernt, Wege verbessert, Poller ergänzt.
opened by Thorsten2219 (2025-06-04 10:45:39+00:00): Weg verlängern? Laut Luftbild vermutlich ein Weg.

via StreetComplete_ee 61.0
closed by Thorsten2219 (2025-06-07 22:27:39+00:00): Linie bereits markiert als man_made cutline (Schneise)
opened by  (2025-06-04 10:45:44+00:00): Coimbatore Tours And Travel Agency

E-Sevai Maiyam, Tamilnadu
closed by COIMBATORE TOURS AND TRAVEL AGENCY & E SEVAI MAIYAM (2025-06-04 11:07:14+00:00): Updates the location
opened by XnL (2025-06-04 10:46:23+00:00): Почта находится 2 кварталами выше в доме 143

via StreetComplete_ee 61.0
opened by XnL (2025-06-04 10:46:24+00:00): Unable to answer "Do the trees here have needles or leaves?" – Natural Wood – https://osm.org/way/627112499 via StreetComplete_ee 61.0:

Нет
opened by Mammi71 (2025-06-04 10:46:33+00:00): ganz viele hw=unclassified in einem (Neubau-) Wohngebiet klingt unwahrscheinlich. Vmtl. inzwischen alles highway=residential
closed by Till_btn (2025-11-30 11:37:56+00:00): angepasst: www.osm.org/changeset/175308977
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:48:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710262802/history

cycleway:surface z segregated=yes i bicycle=no - coś tu raczej nie pasuje. Chyba że jest tu zamknięta zbudowana droga dla rowerów?
closed by JeroMack | Yanosik (2025-08-06 08:26:40+00:00): No właśnie żadnej ścieżki nie ma, tylko chodnik dla pieszych.
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-06 16:41:07+00:00): a są znaki zakazu ruchu dla rowerów?

bo może i bicycle=no jest do zdjęcia
commented by JeroMack | Yanosik (2025-08-07 10:01:57+00:00): Z żadnych zdjęć z poziomu ulicy nie widziałem, sprawdzę przy najbliższej okazji w terenie
closed by Yog Sot (2025-10-03 13:41:55+00:00): solved
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-10 17:27:05+00:00): w sensie że jest tam znak zakazu jazdy rowerem?
closed by Yog Sot (2025-11-15 14:45:50+00:00): z definicji znak zakaz jazdy rowerem nigdy nie dotyczy chodnika, bo zawsze dotyczy wyłącznie jezdni/pobocza. 
Tutaj brak wstepu rowerów ktos zmapował, bo obok jest jezdnia, jednakze polskie prawo dopuszcza jzde po chodniku w róznych przypadkach, wiec jednoznaczne okrelenie zakazu uznaje jako błąd
opened by halibutwig (2025-06-04 10:48:10+00:00): Unable to answer "What type of bicycle rental is this?" – Bicycle Rental – https://osm.org/node/10856155205 via StreetComplete 61.0:

Le village vacances propose des locations de vélo sur réservation et uniquement pour leur clientèle.
opened by Lauri😅finny (2025-06-04 10:48:54+00:00): Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Path – https://osm.org/way/762340493 via StreetComplete 61.0:

Dieser weg existiert nicht

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/282202.jpg
closed by luschi (2025-06-07 16:10:30+00:00): entfernt
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:49:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213265252/history

cycleway:surface z segregated=yes i bicycle=no - coś tu raczej nie pasuje. Chyba że jest tu zamknięta zbudowana droga dla rowerów?
commented by YomanNH (2025-06-04 10:59:36+00:00): Prościej zapytać autora tej drogi...
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 11:07:18+00:00): zapytałem się w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142182626
opened by clamemmel (2025-06-04 10:49:16+00:00): Unable to answer "How are the footpath and bicycle path laid out here?" – Cycle Path – https://osm.org/way/964238398 via StreetComplete 61.0:

Meanwhile also no bicycles allowed any more

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/282203.jpg
closed by fabfab38 (2025-07-26 14:53:41+00:00): done
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:49:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1280382214/history

cycleway:surface z segregated=yes i bicycle=no - coś tu raczej nie pasuje. Chyba że jest tu zamknięta zbudowana droga dla rowerów?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:49:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33795923/history

cycleway:surface with segregated=yes and bicycle=no seems like some kind of error - which tags of those are wrong?
commented by kabelhaai (2025-06-11 01:13:20+00:00): I think it refers to seggregated cyclists/pedestrians. Pedestrians may use a cyclepath. But in this case cyclists may also use a footpath..

Do you know if bikes are allowed on here? According to the current tags they are not permitted. Send a photo perhaps.
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-11 12:58:42+00:00): > But in this case cyclists may also use a footpath

then bicycle=no is wrong
commented by kabelhaai (2025-06-11 14:20:56+00:00): Correct someone who knows the situation on the ground should verify.
commented by kabelhaai (2025-07-13 23:07:13+00:00): #OSMBE #SurveyNeeded
closed by joost schouppe (2025-09-01 12:26:01+00:00): The path is designed to be a segregated walking/cycling path, but there are no traffic signs. I think when eMerzh tried to fix that, he accidentally went a little too far in restricting bicycles. I've reviewed and fixed based on mapillary images
opened by Marvk (2025-06-04 10:49:43+00:00): From what I understand, Puig Sesolles is accessible for all except for the fenced in area, though the land itself still belongs to the military. This begs the question: Should this military area be shrunk to the fenced in area?
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:50:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52597891/history

cycleway:surface with segregated=yes and bicycle=no seems like some kind of error - which tags of those are wrong?
closed by Piagno (2025-06-04 13:05:34+00:00): bicycle=no was from the now finished construction.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167179004
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:50:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54949596/history

cycleway:surface with segregated=yes and bicycle=no seems like some kind of error - which tags of those are wrong?
closed by Bobbi123 (2025-06-04 11:44:40+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Diese Eigenschaften waren veraltet und stammten noch aus der Zeit, bevor die Straße dort eine Fahrradstraße wurde. Ich habe es eben korrigiert und es zum normalen Bürgersteig gemacht.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:50:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/64046468/history

cycleway:surface with segregated=yes and bicycle=no seems like some kind of error - which tags of those are wrong?
closed by literan (2025-06-04 20:59:21+00:00): fixed
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:50:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76946219/history

cycleway:surface with segregated=yes and bicycle=no seems like some kind of error - which tags of those are wrong?
commented by Luzandro (2025-06-05 05:35:52+00:00): there are a few unnecessary tags, but why was this asked by StreetComplete in the first place?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76946219/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134602338
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-05 09:50:07+00:00): maybe triggered by footway:surface added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125926838 ?
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-05 09:51:41+00:00): it looks like it would not be asked nowadays, see https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/blob/master/app/src/androidMain/kotlin/de/westnordost/streetcomplete/quests/segregated/AddCyclewaySegregation.kt
closed by PPete2 (2025-06-06 07:49:04+00:00): It's just a usual sidewalk for foot only. Therefor I removed a few unnecessary tags
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:50:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81611531/history

cycleway:surface with segregated=yes and bicycle=no seems like some kind of error - which tags of those are wrong?
closed by Piagno (2025-06-04 13:08:26+00:00): No indicator or reason found for bicycle=yes, so changed it to a footway.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167179146
opened by huq_hg (2025-06-04 10:50:37+00:00): parking might be here
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:50:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/86302057/history

cycleway:surface with segregated=yes and bicycle=no seems like some kind of error - which tags of those are wrong?
closed by liljaadeliina (2025-07-24 04:38:05+00:00): This has already been resolved by someone else
reopened by Viima (2025-10-11 17:35:13+00:00): The inconsistent tagging persists. Reopening the note.

Tiellä on yhä ristiriitaiset ominaisuustiedot. Avataan uudelleen.
commented by jplahti (2025-10-13 23:02:12+00:00): Kadulla on pitkäaikainen työmaa, jonka takia pyöräilyn olosuhteet vaihtelevat jonkin verran viikoittain. Pyörällä sinänsä pääsee välillä läpi vähän kierrellen vaikka itse pyörätien paikalla on iso kuoppa.
commented by jplahti (2025-10-13 23:04:01+00:00): There is road works on this street and a huge pit where the cycleway has been. Cycling is occassionally possible but it seems to change on week by week basis.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:51:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87377272/history

cycleway:surface with segregated=yes and bicycle=no seems like some kind of error - which tags of those are wrong?
closed by Tolstoi21 (2025-06-16 11:08:50+00:00): Thanks for the note! Removed the offending tags (segregated=, and cycleway:surface=, that is).
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:51:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97967393/history

cycleway:surface with segregated=yes and bicycle=no seems like some kind of error - which tags of those are wrong?
commented by MichaelMarkert (2025-12-12 20:12:29+00:00): segregated=yes, bicycle=yes
closed by czubi (2026-05-13 16:51:38+00:00): erl.
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:51:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99579826/history

cycleway:surface with segregated=yes and bicycle=no seems like some kind of error - which tags of those are wrong?
closed by PPete2 (2025-06-06 07:56:31+00:00): I set correct tags
opened by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 10:51:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101893154/history

cycleway:surface with segregated=yes and bicycle=no seems like some kind of error - which tags of those are wrong?
commented by Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-04 11:08:35+00:00): on looking more into this...

cycleway is marked as separate line - so these lines either should be merged or cycling tag, including segregated=yes should be removed from this one
closed by PPete2 (2025-06-06 08:15:40+00:00): Corrected Topology of footways and cycleways and its Tags
opened by huq_hg (2025-06-04 10:51:41+00:00): currently not accessible due to construction of the building the other side of the street
opened by Lauri😅finny (2025-06-04 10:52:47+00:00): Ab hier beginnt ein fuß-/ Radweg

via StreetComplete 61.0

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/282204.jpg
closed by luschi (2025-06-07 16:10:22+00:00): ist auch als solcher erfasst
opened by Holger Skidzun (2025-06-04 10:55:30+00:00): "The construction work has been finished and a New road has been opened connecting Ave. Charles de Gaulle to Nimrodstraße. As well the First 70 m of Rue Racine. All is designed as a Play-Road with only walking speed for Motor-vehicles.
"
OSM snapshot date: 2025-05-11T16:17:16Z
POI name: Avenue Charles de Gaulle
POI types: highway-construction psurface-unpaved_good hwtag-nocycleway hwtag-nosidewalk hwtag-private
 #organicmaps ios
commented by dangerjens (2025-06-11 19:55:54+00:00): Ja, das stimmt. Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich, keine Sperrung mehr.
opened by Luka Stojanovic (2025-06-04 10:57:11+00:00): Postoji zemljana stazica oko jezera

via StreetComplete 61.0
opened by  (2025-06-04 10:58:51+00:00): drinking water fountain here

#OsmAnd
closed by gj_TIR (2025-09-26 13:23:00+00:00): Hinweis 4789620 erledigt
opened by Takuto (2025-06-04 10:59:07+00:00): Остановки на Королева не включены в ОСМ маршрут автобуса
opened by halibutwig (2025-06-04 11:03:23+00:00): In context of overlay "Buildings" – Building – https://osm.org/way/1171344544 via StreetComplete 61.0:

N'existe pas, ce sont des arbres

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/282205.jpg
closed by Lisapple (2026-03-18 19:24:38+00:00): Corrigé.
opened by pepsi_max2k (2025-06-04 11:06:41+00:00): "Permanently closed. "
OSM snapshot date: 2025-05-11T16:17:16Z
POI name: Carrefour Market
POI types: shop-supermarket
 #organicmaps ios
opened by  (2025-06-04 11:06:42+00:00): ЖК "Imarat Residence"
closed by mapperaid (2025-12-30 08:58:24+00:00): added