piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
opened by mbeyerle (2025-06-21 22:03:43+00:00): add "Linden Hall Spring" tagged as "natural=spring" in its correct location based on map (Figure 2) at https://www.springcreekwatershedatlas.org/post/2019/05/14/thermal-characteristics-of-springs-and-streams-in-the-spring-creek-watershed
opened by Kurabi (2025-06-21 22:04:33+00:00): Unable to answer "Do you have to pay to park here?" – Parking Lot – https://osm.org/way/341311993 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Ce n'est pas un parking payant mais un parking pour le personnel, accessible sur présentation du badge
closed by SpitfireOnline (2025-06-29 16:46:07+00:00): Bonjour,
Dans ce cas il est bien non payant fee=no et l'accès en est privé (access=private), c'est corrigé, je ferme la note au passage
opened by mbeyerle (2025-06-21 22:05:51+00:00): add "Axemann Spring" tagged as "natural=spring" in its correct location based on map (Figure 2) at https://www.springcreekwatershedatlas.org/post/2019/05/14/thermal-characteristics-of-springs-and-streams-in-the-spring-creek-watershed
closed by dannmer (2025-06-28 03:51:37+00:00): No spring visible on imagery, just looks like a lawn
commented by mbeyerle (2025-06-28 11:40:32+00:00): The placement of this note is just an estimate but but I assume PSU researchers would only discuss a spring that exists in reality, which may require local knowledge or a ground survey to map. Reactivating this since the object should still get added to OSM
commented by dannmer (2025-06-28 12:12:14+00:00): There are two other notes concerning springs in PA left by other maps that are nearing their 3rd birthday. Can we agree to resolve this if a location isn't determined within a month?
closed by mbeyerle (2025-06-28 13:25:10+00:00): Added Axemann spring (node 12959380611) in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168227150 However, while I completely share your view that excessive map notes add clutter and little value (and you can see I've closed many too), I do not know of any principle that suggests legitimate map notes should be closed after thirty days of inactivity and think mappers should be somewhat discerning in their closure since plenty of these notes do provide bona fide value adding commentary for mappers
opened by mbeyerle (2025-06-21 22:07:01+00:00): add (or update/add name of currently mapped springs) "Cerro Spring" tagged as "natural=spring" in its correct location based on map (Figure 2) at https://www.springcreekwatershedatlas.org/post/2019/05/14/thermal-characteristics-of-springs-and-streams-in-the-spring-creek-watershed
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:07:42+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance – https://osm.org/node/12943767500 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Flock shot spot

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285961.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 02:58:57+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936241
opened by agentcodec (2025-06-21 22:10:19+00:00): This complex, Bear Creek Glen, has been demolished. It's currently a construction site and should be removed. I have photographs on my phone that show the entire complex destroyed.

The complex immediately below it, Crispen Bays, is still standing.

https://www.surreynowleader.com/local-news/residents-feel-trapped-in-surrey-trailer-park-they-say-is-run-down-8031109

https://www.surreynowleader.com/news/costly-living-housing-headaches-for-residents-forced-out-of-surrey-manufactured-home-park-2988294
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:12:55+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance – https://osm.org/node/12943705270 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Flock shot spot

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285962.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 02:59:20+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936241
opened by annie181818 (2025-06-21 22:13:08+00:00): THIS GATE IS CLOSED GOING TO GREENPARK. ALL VEHICLES WITHOUT STICKER CANNOT ENTER HERE. END OF PHILIP STREET
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:15:05+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance – https://osm.org/node/12943754616 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Flock shot spot

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285963.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 02:59:15+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936241
opened by  (2025-06-21 22:17:29+00:00): genética
opened by matheusgomesms (2025-06-21 22:18:15+00:00): Parece que foi reaberto, vou checar certinho mais tarde
closed by matheusgomesms (2025-06-22 11:05:41+00:00): Feito
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:19:23+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance Camera – https://osm.org/node/12943797292 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Flock alpr solar watching north. Mounted to light pole.

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285964.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 03:50:44+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936877
reopened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 03:53:33+00:00): fixed tags via osm.org/changeset/167936903
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:20:19+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance – https://osm.org/node/12943752016 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Flock shot spot mounted to light pole.

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285965.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 02:59:55+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936241
reopened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 03:52:36+00:00): fixed tags via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936903
reopened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 03:53:45+00:00): grrr ignore fixed tags
opened by John Aizle (2025-06-21 22:21:16+00:00): Stairfoot Battery Storage 33kV DNO Substation needs adding here.
closed by John Aizle (2025-06-24 15:24:24+00:00): Added the battery storage and substation. It could be split into the two and the underground cable connecting if someone knows what they are doing.
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:24:54+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance Camera – https://osm.org/node/12943780693 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Flock alpr solar watching gate/entrance to complex

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285966.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 03:55:03+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936932
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:25:07+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance – https://osm.org/node/12943796254 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Flock shot spot

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285967.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 02:59:28+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936241
opened by John Aizle (2025-06-21 22:26:22+00:00): Stairfoot Battery Storage 40MW does not exist here yet but does on the other side of the substation. Probably will be extended to here.
closed by John Aizle (2025-06-22 21:45:08+00:00): Moved battery storage to other side of substation and area updates
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:28:16+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance – https://osm.org/node/12943767209 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Flock shot spot attached to traffic pole

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285968.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 02:59:37+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936241
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:30:01+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance Camera – https://osm.org/node/12943804630 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Dome. Two boxes. One blue label 2218. One blue label 569.

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285969.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 03:36:15+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936747
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:32:33+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance Camera – https://osm.org/node/12943733139 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Axis alpr watching westbound on cqlmont ave.

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285970.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 03:38:43+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936771
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:33:38+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance Camera – https://osm.org/node/12943766769 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Axis aplr watching northbound las Vegas tr

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285971.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 03:38:45+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936771
opened by Niquarl (2025-06-21 22:33:48+00:00): ce chemin ne semble pas visible sur le terrain, du moins le croisement sud

#OsmAnd
commented by Niquarl (2026-01-17 02:09:57+00:00): Idéalement je souhaiterais une confirmation avant de modifié. #survey #surveyme
opened by Niquarl (2025-06-21 22:33:50+00:00): Aire de jeu qui n'est pas en état pour accueillir des enfants, je pense que l'on peut dire que c'est abandonné...

tout comme le terrain de basket à mon avis

#OsmAnd
closed by Niquarl (2025-08-30 06:02:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171211451
reopened by Niquarl (2025-08-30 06:02:52+00:00): Alors, après lecture de https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix, je vois trois possibilités: disused, abandoned, ruins. ou sinon abandoned=yes.  J'ai décidé de mettre en abandoned:, car je trouve que c'est plus reconstructible que réparable, sinon j'aurais mis disused je pense.
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:34:36+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance Camera – https://osm.org/node/12943770083 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Axis alpr watching eastbound on calmont ave

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285972.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 03:38:48+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936771
opened by R_ic_64 (2025-06-21 22:38:18+00:00): Passage pieton

via StreetComplete 61.1
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:38:47+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance Camera – https://osm.org/node/12943774016 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Flock solar ALPR watching northbound on las Vegas trl.

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285973.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 03:51:12+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936877
opened by _PG_ (2025-06-21 22:38:49+00:00): отсюда на север грейдер

#OsmAnd
opened by _PG_ (2025-06-21 22:38:50+00:00): отсюда на юг грейдер

#OsmAnd
commented by literan (2025-06-23 18:26:22+00:00): а грейдер это что значит? compacted? или песок?
commented by _PG_ (2025-06-23 18:29:48+00:00): compacted
Песок это sand
closed by literan (2025-06-26 19:28:01+00:00): ok
opened by _PG_ (2025-06-21 22:38:51+00:00): это шоссе на юг и на север асфальт

#OsmAnd
opened by Baloo Uriza (2025-06-21 22:39:42+00:00): What is the access at this gate?
closed by mаs (2026-04-14 21:51:16+00:00): seems like it's customers only, as there's a keypad. could be parking for nearby businesses or the houses.
opened by gdt (2025-06-21 22:40:26+00:00): Need to determine if trail is east of feature that looks like stream on LIDAR, or if LIDAR feature is trail.
closed by dannmer (2025-07-26 11:11:42+00:00): trails as mapped in this area match heat map
commented by JesseFTW (2025-07-26 19:07:39+00:00): That feature on the LIDAR (the curving one) is really puzzling! It looks like maybe a dry river bed? I don't remember seeing it when I was last there; I'll try and look next time. I'm pretty confident in the layout of the trail, though, as the trail is gray stone, and you can see the gray stone in the right place on imagery. But let's leave this note open a bit longer to hopefully confirm what that feature on the LIDAR actually is!
opened by Geovelo_Notes (2025-06-21 22:40:48+00:00): tw (This note has been created from Geovelo: https://amenagements-cyclables.fr/fr/contributions/96084)
commented by Geovelo_Notes (2025-08-08 14:09:38+00:00): This note has been removed on Geovelo
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:41:10+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance – https://osm.org/node/12943730695 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Flock shot spot
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 03:00:26+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936241
opened by DerSchmopf (2025-06-21 22:42:10+00:00): Was hat es jetzt mit network:long_name auf sich? Das macht das Ganze nur noch komplizierter, im Wiki gibt es auch nichts dazu, was das irgendwie erklären würde.
Die Lösung vorher mit dem kompletten Namen im network tag und der Abkürzung in network:short_name war doch auch im Name Suggestion Index etabliert. Jetzt wird hier ein eigenes Süppchen gekocht.
commented by berndw (2025-06-22 07:12:00+00:00): Das solltest Du nicht per Fehlerhinweis fragen, sondern den Ersteller im Changeset.

Oder zumindest einen Link auf ein entsprechendes Objekt eintragen, damit man nicht lange forschen muss.

Grundsätzlich gibt es bei OSM kein Verbot, etwas auf eine nicht dokumentierte Weise zu erfassen, zu Beginn war das durchaus üblich.
Und das Wiki wird auch nur von relativ wenigen Leuten bearbeitet, da kann es durchaus Lücken oder einseitige Meinungen geben.

Hätten wir einen Rat o.ä., der alles exakt vorgibt, würde OSM wahrscheinlich keinen Spaß machen. 

;-)

m2c
Bernd
commented by limes11 (2025-06-22 17:33:16+00:00): long_name ist durchaus gängig, daher ist network:long_name naheliegend (und macht nichts kaputt).

Generell wird dazu geraten, unter network den vollen Namen zu erfassen, allerdings wird/wurde dies beim VRS in der Breite nicht umgesetzt. Ca. 5-mal so viele "VRS" wie "Verkehrsverbund Rhein-Sieg" an Relationen.
closed by DerSchmopf (2025-06-25 09:25:19+00:00): Seitdem der Name Suggestion Index network=Verkehrsverbund Rhein-Sieg
und Rhein-Sieg
network:short=VRS vorschlägt, wird network=VRS immer mehr ersetzt und ist auch auf Taginfo klar rückgänig. Auch haben andere das ganze schon wieder auf die Variante vom NSI zurückgesetzt, weil sie das im iD-Editor vorgeschlagen bekommen.

Wenn man sich z.B. den Relationverlauf von Bus N2 (2031365) anschaut, sieht man schon einen kleinen edit war.
commented by limes11 (2025-06-25 19:55:13+00:00): Was ist der Name Suggestion Index ?

In der Tat hat das mittlerweile das Ausmaß eines Edit-Wars.
commented by limes11 (2025-06-25 19:55:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168106064
closed by TG-map4 (2026-07-12 16:46:07+00:00): Since this discussion has been open/ended since 1 year, I would like to remind, that notes are not the right place for general tagging discussions: osm.wiki/Notes#:~:text=Please%20do%20not%20use%20notes%20for%20general%20discussion
This is a question not solely to this place here in Bonn, but at a lot of places in North-Rhine Westfalia. Therefore, please continue disussion in the OSM forum or a malinglist if needed.

There is already a discussion going on here, the root cause of all of this, NSI: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/11387

For those of you who not already know the Name Suggestion Index: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Name_Suggestion_Index

It is a github page, with tagging presets, that e.g. the iD editor uses. Therefore a lot of mappers unintentionnally change VRS to the long name. My assumption is, someone entered the database entry for VRS in NSI as a long name at some point (I don't know who, I can't find the place for the history). Since then, this tagging became more widespread. But it must be a person without knowledge or "the big picture in mind" or maybe this person just used Wikipedia/Wikidata as a source for the name without thinking about the consequences. However, I fully agree to bernward1, that the short name "VRS" has been the de-facto standard since years and is at a lot of pages in the OSM wiki. A lot of queries rely on that. Although abbreveations are not nice from a data standpoint, I think we should stick to the short name VRS in my opinion and only add the long name with the suffix tagging. The "wrong" NSI entry must be corrected to the short name to prevent further spreading. But this is a discussion not for this note, but for the OSM forum. Someone (e.g. a bot account) should finally and once and for all query all VRS (long and short name) entries in NRW, and then set it evenly to the same tagging for every object. To prevent different mapping. Then the wiki pages should all be uniform.
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:44:06+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance – https://osm.org/node/12943760889 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Flock shot spot
commented by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:44:53+00:00): Forgot pic

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285974.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 03:00:12+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936241
opened by epigen108 (2025-06-21 22:47:07+00:00): Unable to answer "This shop has been vacant. What’s here now?" – https://osm.org/node/2807591666 via StreetComplete 61.1:

16: intersport Geyer, 14: Juwelier Bossle, 12: Nachhilfe Lernrakete + Kiliansbäch Café

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285976.jpg
opened by epigen108 (2025-06-21 22:47:07+00:00): Unable to answer "Are these opening hours still correct?" – Backhaus Nahrstedt (Bakery) – https://osm.org/node/3619538449 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Leerstände Nr 8 + 10

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285977.jpg
opened by epigen108 (2025-06-21 22:47:08+00:00): Unable to answer "What are the opening hours here?" – Naturlädchen (Convenience Store) – https://osm.org/node/569337818 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Heißt jetzt "Frau Pudding second Hand", Di-Fr 10-16h

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285978.jpg
opened by epigen108 (2025-06-21 22:47:08+00:00): Unable to answer "Do these steps have a ramp? What kind?" – Steps – https://osm.org/way/1266881560 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Nur Treppe, aber Rampe ist gleich daneben entlang der NW-Fassade
opened by epigen108 (2025-06-21 22:47:08+00:00): Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – on bridge: Path – https://osm.org/way/62752322 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Steg (Holz)

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285979.jpg
opened by epigen108 (2025-06-21 22:47:09+00:00): Dieser Weg ist eigentlich kein Weg, sondern nur ein gemähter Streifen entlang des Ackers. Sehr uneben.

via StreetComplete 61.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285980.jpg
commented by Michi (2025-06-22 22:25:48+00:00): Das Bild zeigt eigentlich schön das hier ein Weg ist. Der Bauer hätte niemals sein Getreide weggemäht - da war die Gemeinde am Werk. Zudem laufen drei Wanderrouten darüber. Der Weg ist mit highway=track / tracktype=grade4 / surface=grass getaggt. Also IMHO passt das soweit...
closed by sw_uwu (2025-07-06 13:09:53+00:00): Ich habe noch smoothness hinzugefügt und anhand den Gründen in dem obigen Kommentar + 2 Wochen inaktivität würde ich das dann schließen
opened by epigen108 (2025-06-21 22:47:10+00:00): Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – Bicycle Parking – https://osm.org/node/3054670638 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Hier war definitiv nie ein offizieller Fahrradstellplatz

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285981.jpg
commented by Michi (2025-06-21 23:36:18+00:00): Hier war definitiv doch schon mal ein Fahrradstellplatz, nämlich am 1.9.2014:
https://imgur.com/a/ae4i3XA
commented by epigen108 (2025-06-22 09:54:49+00:00): OK, fair enough. So nah an der Ecke hatte ich ihn nicht vermutet. Da steht jetzt aber nicht mehr (außer der Busch). Wurde in der Zwischenzeit die Straße neu gemacht? Die Steinblöcke sind auch ausgetauscht worden.
closed by Michi (2025-06-22 22:16:21+00:00): Die Straße müsste so ca. 2020 saniert worden sein. Die Steinblöcke sind auch "runder".
opened by epigen108 (2025-06-21 22:47:11+00:00): Infotafel demontiert?

via StreetComplete 61.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285982.jpg
commented by Michi (2025-06-22 22:18:05+00:00): Das hat früher (21.9.2022) mal so ausgeschaut: https://imgur.com/a/TUxubep
Vielleicht kommt's wieder?
commented by sw_uwu (2025-07-06 13:12:02+00:00): Habe mal den removed lifecycle hinzugefügt, da das Schild anscheinend entfernt wurde, falls es wieder kommt dann einfach nur die Prefixe löschen.
closed by qugeb (2025-09-10 10:08:22+00:00): damit ist ja alles erledigt
opened by mbeyerle (2025-06-21 22:47:39+00:00): add "Continental Courts Spring" tagged as "natural=spring" in its correct location based on map (Figure 2) at https://www.springcreekwatershedatlas.org/post/2019/05/14/thermal-characteristics-of-springs-and-streams-in-the-spring-creek-watershed
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:48:14+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance Camera – https://osm.org/node/12943807143 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Flock alpr solar watching northeast ish.

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285983.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 03:51:03+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936877
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:51:11+00:00): DA fuq is this?

via StreetComplete 61.1

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285984.jpg
commented by bdentremont (2025-06-22 21:03:10+00:00): Probably a 5G mobile phone network.  Newer networks often use multiple short range transmitters from utility poles where older networks would have used a tower.
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-24 00:27:32+00:00): Looks like that's probably it. A "small cell" deployment:

https://www.raycap.com/products/pole-toppers/
reopened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-24 00:59:25+00:00): side-note: went down a rabbit hole of how to map utility poles and the various utilities that are on them. No clear standard, honestly. Various ad-hoc pieces have emerged over time. Did my best to tag appropriately: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168025680

However... I'm actually not sure that the wires going back to the other utility pole in the background are power wires. Power could actually be coming from the ground up to what looks like a meter box. I'm gonna run back to this spot to confirm whether power is from those aerial lines or from underground.
commented by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-27 15:15:07+00:00): yep. power from ground.
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-29 22:05:24+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168284704
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:53:13+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance – https://osm.org/node/12943824349 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Flock shot spot

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285985.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 03:00:56+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936241
opened by  (2025-06-21 22:53:17+00:00): Green Bay remodeling san jose
closed by Black_Diamond (2025-08-17 06:44:52+00:00): It looks like this was already added. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9429750719 for details.
opened by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-21 22:56:19+00:00): In context of overlay "Things" – Surveillance – https://osm.org/node/12943822248 via StreetComplete 61.1:

Flock shot spot attached to wooden light pole.

Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/285986.jpg
closed by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (2025-06-22 03:01:15+00:00): resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936241