piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
closed by freebeer (2018-01-18 20:32:18+00:00): Obviously Bamboo Grove.  Heading northbound.
The bug-report was auto-generated from rough GPS positioning, then dumped through an anonymising gateway, so that the original reporter has no idea their problem report isn't acted upon by the supplier.
Therefore I can guarantee you'll not see a response to this, and an on-ground survey is required, in which case this so-called bug-report is pretty useless.
Since nobody's bothered so far, I can't see any point to leave this open, as there is plenty more info in the area needing mapping as well.
opened by Neukirchener (2016-04-25 20:56:32+00:00): http://www.rp-online.de/nrw/staedte/grevenbroich/stadt-plant-reihenhaeuser-am-wevelinghovener-friedhof-aid-1.5929322
commented by Neukirchener (2016-10-14 10:43:28+00:00): Hatte ich glatt überlesen. Es soll am Dinkelstraße direkt neben dem REWE entstehen.
opened by  (2016-04-25 20:58:43+00:00): rerer
opened by  (2016-04-25 20:59:49+00:00): Association LESA
Le village
05300 Eourres
closed by icluf (2025-02-18 09:00:59+00:00): l'association n'est plus à cette adresse
https://annuaire-entreprises.data.gouv.fr/entreprise/500169339 et https://annuaire-entreprises.data.gouv.fr/etablissement/50016933900016
opened by  (2016-04-25 21:00:01+00:00): Livesey Hall
commented by andrewblack (2019-10-31 19:36:30+00:00): What needs adding/ correcting
commented by harg (2019-10-31 22:54:10+00:00): Seems to be https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1253110 but the map and postcode both suggest it's further north.
closed by unzow (2024-10-04 11:05:39+00:00): Closing this anon note for now, does not seem to contain enough information useful for mapping
opened by  (2016-04-25 21:01:03+00:00): Este erro foi enviado pelo Navmii GPS.
Barreira faltando:
opened by  (2016-04-25 21:05:44+00:00): Csúcs
opened by legandras (2016-04-25 21:08:23+00:00): Newton szikla
opened by  (2016-04-25 21:25:07+00:00): An die locals:
Hier herrscht ein Versatz von über 8x9m ggü. Bing und Bay80cm vor... 
Darf hier per coutch-mapping editiert und korrigiert werden oder besteht hier die Gefahr etwas zu zerstören?
commented by NUP (2016-04-27 17:37:10+00:00): Das ist schon ewig her, wo dies erfasst worden ist. Es sollte daher editiert werden. Und zerstören kann man im Prinzip gar nichts (außer Vandalismus), das ist aber in 5 Jahren nur einmal passiert, was ich mal mitbekommen hatte.
commented by  (2016-05-29 05:36:13+00:00): Ich sehe eher das Problem, dass ich noch keine Lösung für eine exakte Erfassung habe. Mit GPS/GPX-Daten herrscht eine Abweichung von etwa ±3 Meter, von den Satellitenbildern, unabhängig welche, sind unbekannte Abweichungen immer noch möglich.
commented by NUP (2016-05-29 06:07:46+00:00): OK, anhand der unzähligen GPX-Daten von Ulm/Neu-Ulm wurde der Bing-Versatz in JOSM mit "-0.60; 3.29" eingestellt. Ich kann aber keine bessere Abweichung als ±3m versprechen, jedoch wird das somit exakter als zuvor.
commented by rainerU (2016-07-02 09:49:44+00:00): Die Strassen im Umfeld sind alle ziemlich genau an Bing und Bayern 80cm ausgerichtet. Das entspricht auch den auf osm.org abgelegten GPS-Tracks. Ich bin dafür, dies auch bei den Sportanlagen so zu machen.

Ich habe schon mal Umrisse und relative Lage der Objekte zueinander ein wenig korrigiert.
opened by  (2016-04-25 21:25:45+00:00): 709 East Charter Oak Rd
Edmond, Ok 73034
closed by mhenson (2016-04-26 13:29:22+00:00): added, do you have a company name that is here?
opened by Maurice Pinder (2016-04-25 21:26:46+00:00): This street should be הרב אור שרגא
(HaRav Or Shraga)
closed by Sanniu (2017-10-30 12:33:29+00:00): Fixed, thanks.
opened by  (2016-04-25 21:31:27+00:00): This error is submitted from Navmii GPS.
Missing speed limit:
closed by Deanna Earley (2016-04-29 10:53:26+00:00): Please reactivate this note with more information on the actual speed limit and the start and stop points if possible.
opened by Maurice Pinder (2016-04-25 21:34:44+00:00): There is no bus stop here on this side of the road. There is one stop about100metres north (not 2 stops as shown on the map) and there is no bus stop on אצ"ג
closed by Sanniu (2017-11-08 10:07:02+00:00): Fixed by bulk bus stop update
opened by Jo89195 (2016-04-25 21:36:49+00:00): According to: http://www.frankieandbennys.com/restaurant/frankie-bennys-wrexham-eagles-meadow
There should be a Frankie and Bennys at Unit B11a, 40 Eagles Meadow
Wrexham, LL13 8DG
commented by trigpoint (2016-04-25 22:50:15+00:00): I can confirm it is there, on the balcony
commented by  (2016-05-16 23:45:07+00:00): Surveyed and added
opened by Maurice Pinder (2016-04-25 21:37:19+00:00): Should be שלום סיון (Shalom Sivan)
closed by Sanniu (2017-10-30 12:31:53+00:00): This is the name now, thanks.
opened by  (2016-04-25 22:11:01+00:00): Hier in der Ecke scheint einiges nicht zu stimmen, Fußwege sind als highway=service oder highway=living_street getaggt, enige Wege access=private.
commented by jlcod (2016-04-27 23:21:51+00:00): habe mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38938462 gerade einiges verbessert, Ortsbegehung für access-tags nötig, am besten auch für die Wege südlich des Kanalwegs bis "im Wald".
commented by jlcod (2016-04-27 23:28:53+00:00): ...auch um zu sehen wo es wirklich living_street ist und wo nicht, und wo welche Fuß- und Radwege wirklich Namen haben.
commented by  (2018-07-07 17:14:42+00:00): Kanalweg ist hier und auch entlang 100...110 keine Spielstraße sondern normale Einwohnerstraße. Service wäre auch denkbar.
closed by MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2019-04-14 16:27:36+00:00): Das Stück ist normale 30er Zone. Versuche mich gerade daran, das ganze bei mapillary hochzuladen, ob's klappt, schaun mer mal ...
opened by  (2016-04-25 22:25:56+00:00): [TIG HEADQUARTERS]
<br>1180 PEACHTREE ST NE<br>
Suite 1810<br>
ATLANTA-GA, 30309<br>
+1 (404) 551 4021</p>
opened by  (2016-04-25 22:26:30+00:00): New Housing Development here, roads completed.
closed by Steeley (2018-02-26 15:47:10+00:00): Resolving as duplicate of newer note.
opened by  (2016-04-25 22:27:12+00:00): New retail and football stadium development under construction here.
opened by  (2016-04-25 22:31:29+00:00): This error is submitted from Navmii GPS.
Blocked street:
ToD ahead blocked
closed by trigpoint (2016-04-25 22:51:05+00:00): Bollard already mapped
opened by Kirbert (2016-04-25 22:39:41+00:00): I've drawn in Fred George Park about as well as I can using GPS tracking.  Once updated satellite views become available, it should be corrected accordingly.
commented by maxolasersquad (2017-09-01 19:18:56+00:00): Added a lot of detail. The images are more update at zoom level 19 or lower.
commented by  (2017-09-02 04:29:55+00:00): Looks good!  I think the two paths that go north and end are supposed to connect into a loop.  Once drawn in, I think this note will be resolved.
commented by Adamant1 (2018-04-18 10:01:13+00:00): It looks like there is other trails in the north end of the park too that have not been mapped yet. Its hard to tell where they go with the tree cover though.
commented by Adamant1 (2018-04-18 10:03:36+00:00): There's a map of the trails here if anyone wants to look at it and add them http://cms.leoncountyfl.gov/Portals/0/docs/FredGeorgeGreenwayPark_packet.pdf
commented by maxolasersquad (2018-12-28 13:23:54+00:00): Maps found that are not clearly licenses for open or OSM use should not be used for building OSM data.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pick_your_mapping_technique#Armchair_mapping
closed by Adamant1 (2018-12-28 22:06:03+00:00): I wouldnt necessarily say that. There was something on the wiki awhile back about how its ok to use map data from none commercial maps or indexes. Id think that especially applies to goverment maps, which are in my opinion and in most cases ive found public domain. Even if it doesnt explicity say so. Its sort of a given. Otherwise, quit a lot of things in openstreetmaps wouldnt exist. Including bus routes, any official boundary for anything, any type of border, lots of road names/access restrictions,  or anything else official for that matter. So I see people use goverment sources all the time without issue. Even if the page refrenenced doesnt explicity give consent. Its a given because its the government. 

I'll try and find the specific reference if needed, but I dont think I should have to.
commented by maxolasersquad (2018-12-28 22:17:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.1

"As a rule of thumb, use no external resources except those available in the editors. If you think you found a non-copyrighted resource that isn't available in the editors, please discuss it first with local mappers using contact channels."

Government produced data is not necessarily "open" or "free" data. Before assuming that a source of data is licenses in a way that is compatible with ODbL it's important to verify it is compatible. Governments in the past have been resistant or out-right refused to allow their data to be used by OSM and sometimes actually have quite restrictive licenses.
commented by  (2018-12-28 22:44:30+00:00): Cool about what the wiki says. As I said, I read differently. Anyone can edit the wiki however they want and its not god rule. It obviously depends on the situation. In this situation I provided a link to a map of the information, but in no way did I say people shouldnt check the licencesing or anything. Obviously they should. Its kind of a given. Outside of that, its useless to debate international/goverment copyright law and usage rights. From my own experinces in California no one gives two squats and 99% of it is useable. That goes for 99% of America. I dont give two craps what the usage rights of gis data from the goverment of Surbia is. 

heres the link to the FL gis departement in this area. Free to contact them and ask if you want. http://www.tlcgis.org. In the mean time, it might be against the rules to use copyrighted information, but its to link to it and you dont know either way. For all you know I did the proper research already and your just posting the warning for nothing.
commented by maxolasersquad (2018-12-28 22:51:18+00:00): Using sources of data to build OSM is a very big violation of the rules and can get you banned for life from editing OSM. The copyright of OSM is very important and we should all be diligent about not contaminating the dataset. Whether you agree with other people's licenses, or OSMs license, or licensing in general, at the very least respect the intent of OSM to create a free dataset by abiding by the rules that give the OSM dataset legal integrity.
commented by maxolasersquad (2018-12-28 22:51:55+00:00): Sorry. that first sentence should state "using non-free sources of data ..."
commented by  (2018-12-28 22:52:49+00:00): Just for reference, theres also something called "fair use." For it to qualify as copyright infregment it has to qualify as a "substantial" usage. 

see here https://www.mail-archive.com/legal-talk@openstreetmap.org/msg06106.html

and here https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines/Substantial_-_Guideline

Although in those cases its in the context of using osm without attribution, it would also apply to something like double checking the spelling of a roads name on a goverments database.
commented by freebeer (2018-12-29 20:35:28+00:00): fair use is also a concept that only applies in certain jurisdictions, and probably does not apply to much of the world, and is known as `fair dealing' where osm is concerned.

and it is intended for context in criticism and the like, and is inapplicable in the osm case of creating a map (as opposed to a comparison of osm against other mapping services, f'rinstance).

also, to paraphrase richard as found often, osm seeks to be whiter than white and does not attempt to push the boundaries of copyright law.

fair use does not exist *at all* where i am concerned, and where very few governments allow any of their data inclusion into osm.  luckily i didn't throw that at nakaner when he demanded that part of a copyrighted article quoted be deleted (provided for context in place of a rewritten summary).

this is also why i do not even look at sources unless they are specifically listed as acceptable to osm, leaving it to those in these countries to know their local rules the best, rather than trying to keep it straight in me pitifully little or no brane.
closed by Adamant1 (2018-12-31 02:38:20+00:00): Well, yeah. That was kind of my point. That there's no universal copyright law and it varies by what suburb etc you live in. So its ridiculous to even discuss it in the first place unless its an obviously egregious infraction (like that one time I mapped that shopper center...Good times). Otherwise people's eyes are just going to roll into the back of their heads. Which is why it usually requires admin removal due to a company sending them a take down notice. Most of the time even people that are whole hog importing data from a commercial map can't rationalize why its a problem. That's why I think constantly reminding the naive mapper masses about it is futile. Especially when its just from someone posting a link to a map (that might or not be copyrighted) and isn't even adding the data to the map. Let alone advocating someone else do it by disregarding copyright.

I especially take issue him saying "Using sources of data to build OSM is a very big violation of the rules and can get you banned for life from editing OSM." Not only is it just wrong, but it also might dissuade people from even for legitimate sources they can use. Plus, it just comes off like he thinks people are ignorant and can't figure this stuff out without being explicitly told (which undermines my early argument to that effect, but its coming from a different place. So whatever). 

Ultimately, its  maxolasersquad's prerogative if he wants to lecture people and quote useless information, but its also my prerogative if I want to be like "hey man, I've had this conversation 100 times and it never went anywhere because copyright is screwed up, and know one can figure it out. Plus, posting a link to a government map isn't a violation anyway. Even if its copyright. Which you have zero way of known and I didn't insinuate wasn't."

Even if I had of linked to Google maps and explicitly said it was OK to copy, it wouldn't be an issue unless someone put it on the map. I've given people crap for that myself.
commented by Adamant1 (2018-12-31 02:39:39+00:00): So I'm not against reminding people its necessary. I just don't think this particular instance warrants a warning.
commented by  (2018-12-31 02:55:20+00:00): Let's make sure we map OSM according to the rules of OSM. Also, we shouldn't encourage others to break the rules of OSM. We should do this Eleven when we disagree with those rules.

Theres no need to be emotional about this. If I'm incorrect on these rules I very much welcome being corrected so that I can make sure I'm following the correct rules and not spreading disinformation. I'm not angry with you or your suggestion of using that map, but it does seem to go against OSMs rules on sources that can/should be used and so I hope that you understand why OSM does not allow this and respect that decision. If I'm wrong please provide a clear explanation on what I'm misunderstanding.
commented by  (2018-12-31 02:57:23+00:00): Ugh. I didn't realize I was not logged in to OSM when I made thste note. I didn't mean to post it anonymously.
commented by maxolasersquad (2018-12-31 03:01:02+00:00): One more time. 🙄
commented by Adamant1 (2018-12-31 03:17:52+00:00): You posted the second one anonymously also ;) It's cool. I do that all the time. I'm not meaning to be emotional about it. Its important to follow the rules and I agree that in general we shouldn't encourage the use of copyrighted information. Me and Freebeer get in these types of backs and forth's a lot. So don't read into it to much ;)

None of us are copyright lawyers (that I know of) and its way to complicated of a subject to figure out here. I don't even think that the DWG (or whoever takes care of that) has it completely figured out. Considering that, I could have included a part after the link about not using it if its copyrighted. I just assumed that was a given though. But its my bad either way. 

Its really important in my mind though to separate the linking to of potentially copyrighted information (if its included with the caveat that the person should check the copyright before using it. Which I totally should have included). Versus the actual use of copyrighted information. Their two different things. I usually link in good faith that the other person will double check before using it also. I don't feel like being paralyzed to link to outside sources by copyright infringement fears. 

I have yet to see anyone even use the information in the link. The last edit to the trails was two years ago. If someone does end up adding something to the park, I'm perfectly willing ask them if it was from the link and if they checked the copyright or not. I'll even call the FL GIS department to see if it can be freely used if need be since it doesn't say one or another on their site from what I can find. I did that in the instance of an alley next to a church once that had an access restriction for horses. 

I will say though that I've seen many people cite Google maps as a source that haven't gotten their accounts blocked. In 99% of the cases its just newbies that don't know any better and blocking them for it wouldn't be productive. So context does matter a lot.
commented by Adamant1 (2018-12-31 03:20:05+00:00): Usually in those cases I'll just tell the person that its not a valid source and that whatever they add based on it will "probably" get deleted. That's a better tact then telling them their account will get deleted for posting it. Which usually just freaks them out (and just isn't true. Despite what the wiki says).
commented by maxolasersquad (2018-12-31 03:29:04+00:00): I've tried to contact the TLCGIS group but could not figure out how to. I found an email address once but they never responded to my inquiry. I used to know a county commissioner and he gave me a number to call, but I lost the number. I would love to get explicitly permission from them to use the dataset for OSM but haven't been able to. I've only ever used data from there after noticing something on that map and then physically visiting the site to independently confirm and collect the data.
commented by freebeer (2019-01-05 19:10:17+00:00): just thought i would throw out there that since about christmas there has been a pretty steady stream of reversions and redacted changesets from DWG member Vladimir, which for a week increased the size of https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions from its typical 400-odd pages to 14'000 (!) displayed by text browser `lynx'.  it's back to a bit over 500 pages at the moment as another set of redactions gets posted from copying from Here maps (yandeks also got mentioned in the last week).

now these are commercial providers like google, not the us federal government which i understand explicitly puts its data in public domain which is acceptable for osm, while local texas governments are a lot more possessive of their data - although i understand that the usgs large-scale aerial imageries project was abandoned in previous form to contract out to google, so i don't know what affect such privatisation will have on federal data, and that i leave to those familiar with us copyright rules, but that is one reason why the us presents less of white space than other countries and why you don't have to worry about borders and such.

now i don't know the background behind the  current large-scale worldwide redaction of data and why it's an issue now, but i would guess it's not so much self-policing like we are trying to do here, but an official DWG/LWG complaint that probably has yet to come from google so far which we should not treat as tolerance or turning a blind eye (i am aware of a massive revert of google data that osm is slowly recovering from as more mappers get involved).

much government data around me is contracted out to private companies so that those government agencies are very defensive about unauthorised use and osm/users have gotten in serious trouble.

this is why i have started to make sure that references referring to other incompatible maps disappear from view even if the comment refers to a fix, to avoid that temptation i have seen too often bitten.
commented by maxolasersquad (2020-01-20 15:27:55+00:00): I walked this trail over the weekend with my wife. I have uploaded the GPX track to OSM and updated the map based on that walk. The western trails still need to have some work done to them, but this park is mostly completely mapped.
closed by maxolasersquad (2020-01-25 17:56:54+00:00): I walked the rest of the paths, GPS traced them, and mapped them. All trails here are now completely mapped. The final changeset is 80080146.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80080146
opened by  (2016-04-25 22:43:49+00:00): ALY 1
closed by Deanna Earley (2016-04-26 13:57:42+00:00): Please reactivate with more details if possible.
opened by  (2016-04-25 22:45:15+00:00): ALY JAYA 2
opened by  (2016-04-25 22:45:56+00:00): ALY JAYA 3
opened by  (2016-04-25 22:46:30+00:00): ALY JAYA 4
opened by  (2016-04-25 22:54:25+00:00): Cette voie sans issue notée comme rue est une  voie d'accès privée  et devrait donc être hachurée comme telle. Merci
 Un riverain
closed by Jakka (2016-04-26 12:38:14+00:00): accès privée ajouter. Merci pour la connaissance local.http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/554811#map=19/50.80402/4.35406&layers=N
opened by PALEVIĆ (2016-04-25 23:15:07+00:00): PALEVIC
closed by soliMM (2024-06-29 21:38:22+00:00): Note doesn't provide enough info to do anything on OSM. Closing it for now. If user has more info to provide, he can reactivate note and leave a comment with more details.
opened by yanina martinez (2016-04-25 23:16:29+00:00): Calle: Belgrano 626, Escuela Nª 184- INSTITUTO DE ENSEÑANZA EDU-PRO
closed by mweper (2017-02-07 17:40:23+00:00): Nota mal ubicada pero, PDI corregido/agregado. Gracias por colaborar.
opened by  (2016-04-25 23:32:40+00:00): Residencias El Jurel
opened by ALANVLA (2016-04-25 23:37:40+00:00): Residencias El Jurel
opened by  (2016-04-26 00:00:19+00:00): There's also a tree here
closed by eastender (2018-12-12 20:58:25+00:00): Tree added.
opened by Alan Trick (2016-04-26 00:14:36+00:00): The ICBC Office here is moving to Clearbrook Plaza mall at the end of the month: http://www.selectdrivingschool.com/home/icbc_is_moving
commented by Alan Trick (2016-04-26 00:14:53+00:00): (end of May)
opened by  (2016-04-26 00:29:21+00:00): Falta el número de casa 2267
closed by muralito (2016-06-03 13:37:31+00:00): En esta acera van los pares, y esta todo numerado. En la acera de enfrente por 21 van del 2281 en adelante, y por Bv. España ya esta el 2267.
opened by sg394 (2016-04-26 00:34:37+00:00): cette partie de la voie ferrée n'existe plus. il n'y a plus de passage à niveau. Mais je ne sais pas jusqu'où la voie ferrée a été démontée.
closed by sg394 (2016-05-28 23:58:35+00:00): correction effectuée, mais ce n'est peut-être pas parfait plus loin au nord
opened by sg394 (2016-04-26 00:42:15+00:00): il y a un parc à chiens ici
opened by ptshark (2016-04-26 00:47:37+00:00): Progress St does not connect fall river ave and highland Ave.  Would be nice if it did
opened by  (2016-04-26 00:47:50+00:00): 北京交通大学
opened by sg394 (2016-04-26 01:00:51+00:00): tracé du lac peu précis. de plus il y a une île au centre
opened by sg394 (2016-04-26 01:01:50+00:00): il y a des voies de circulation et des chemins piétons absents dans le parc Pie-XII
commented by Martin868 (2017-12-19 20:56:26+00:00): quelqu'un fait pas pas mal de ménage dans ce parc. On peut fermer cette note ?
closed by Fralambert2017 (2018-01-03 04:50:25+00:00): Je pense que oui.
opened by  (2016-04-26 01:16:16+00:00): This is W Stephens St
commented by  (2016-04-26 01:17:48+00:00): Wrong pin
opened by  (2016-04-26 01:18:16+00:00): W Stephens St
closed by freebeer (2018-06-26 15:37:45+00:00): on the map