piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
closed by indigomc (2016-04-18 17:30:48+00:00): No useful info at this location.
opened by gottferdom (2014-09-04 11:53:32+00:00): Le numéro 9 n'existe pas ?
En tout cas pas d'entrée à ce numéro dans l'immeuble, même s'il est un peu complexe (plusieurs bâtiments accolés)
closed by Dof (2016-12-24 23:19:43+00:00): Si si, j'ai vérifié, y'a bien un numéro 9, pile a l’endroit de la note
commented by  (2016-12-25 08:39:42+00:00): Me suis trompé à l'époque, c'est le numéro 11 qui n'existe pas vraiment. Mais il s'agit en fait des garages.
opened by  (2014-09-04 11:59:08+00:00): Gebäude an Breslauerstr 5 (neu) fehlt
commented by NUP (2014-09-07 18:03:38+00:00): Danke für die Info, wird bei Gelegenheit vor Ort gesichtet und eingezeichnet.
closed by NUP (2014-12-14 14:53:26+00:00): Gebäude wurde (vorher Oberer Weideweg 11) ersetzt.
opened by gottferdom (2014-09-04 12:06:10+00:00): Installation de bornes électriques pour véhicules autopartage en cours (http://www.grenoble.fr/TPL_CODE/TPL_ACTUALITE/PAR_TPL_IDENTIFIANT/857/338-transports-a-grenoble-en-commun-et-covoiturage.htm)
commented by gottferdom (2014-09-04 12:06:28+00:00): (je ne sais pas vraiment comment taguer ça)
commented by Virgile1994 (2014-09-09 18:41:23+00:00): Je compte attendre la mise en service de toutes des stations avant de les tagger.
Ca se tague comme un autopartage classique je pense, avec "amenity=car_sharing". On au aussi ajouter un tag pour la/les bornes électriques. Ca doit bien exister.
opened by  (2014-09-04 12:08:43+00:00): Неправилно ограничение на скоростта. Докладваното ограничение на скоростта е 45 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by Veso (2014-09-07 07:29:34+00:00): Invalid
opened by DP-Rodian (2014-09-04 12:09:31+00:00): Traganou Beach
opened by  (2014-09-04 12:17:14+00:00): No left turn
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by hsc666 (2014-10-21 19:51:05+00:00): No street. No left turn. No details. No chance to ask. Useless Wisepilot report.
opened by David Crochet (2014-09-04 12:18:02+00:00): Mairie
opened by David Crochet (2014-09-04 12:19:34+00:00): Mairie (supprimer l'autre bug)
closed by py_berrard (2014-09-04 16:03:24+00:00): ok
opened by Tiliae (2014-09-04 12:26:49+00:00): maxspeed = 70 ist hier nicht mehr aktuell
closed by degernfelder (2014-09-23 17:23:10+00:00): jetzt 100
opened by lluc (2014-09-04 12:26:50+00:00): speed 70
closed by JBacc1 (2014-09-05 12:41:32+00:00): ok
opened by lluc (2014-09-04 12:26:50+00:00): speed  70
commented by JBacc1 (2014-09-05 12:26:13+00:00): entre les deux marqueurs ?
commented by  (2014-09-05 12:29:04+00:00): Oui. (je n'avais pas encore pris le temps de reporter la correction).
commented by lluc (2014-09-05 12:30:14+00:00): Points relevés avec l'option "Bug" d'OSMAND (sur tablette )
closed by JBacc1 (2014-09-05 12:41:30+00:00): ok
commented by py_berrard (2014-09-04 15:56:23+00:00): De où à où ?
Créer une autre note, si besoin.
closed by lluc (2014-09-04 18:55:26+00:00): Oups ...
J'ai fait ça en voiture (comme passage) dans le sens Châtellerault->La Puye.
J'avais prévu de reporter la correction ensuite.
Elle est liée à la note n° 236051.
Je vais corriger.
opened by  (2014-09-04 12:36:27+00:00): DE552EH sokak farmwell lane
closed by trigpoint (2014-10-17 16:29:36+00:00): There is no road here, and if there was it would not have a Derby postcode
opened by HUGH SYLVESTER (2014-09-04 12:40:34+00:00): This is not a public footway as marked but a private access path to rear gardens and is private property.
commented by  (2016-05-13 09:18:12+00:00): Again; This path is private property and not a public footpath and as such should be removed from the map to avoid trespass..
commented by hadw (2017-04-22 15:45:01+00:00): The easiest way to do this is to change it yourself, however please change the access to "no"; do not delete it as it does really exist and you may find that someone simply maps it again from what they can see on Bing.

Assuming you are using the default editor (iD) accessed from the web site, select each section of the path in turn (I don't know why it is in two parts).  Click on "All fields", then under "Allowed Access": All, select "no" from the pulldown menu.  Click "Save".  Enter an explanation in the "Changeset Comment".  Try to explain how a stranger could determine that the path was private, as some people take the view that if there is nothing that says it is private that is visible on the site, there is "nothing on the ground" to support private tagging.  (Personally, I think one can normally recognize private back alleys when one sees them.)

I can't do it, as I am not in a position to verify it myself.  (Please do not suggest Google Streetview, as their terms of service forbid its use for such purposes.)

Unfortunately, the person who mapped this hasn't been active for six years.  Otherwise the alternative approach would have been to add a comment on the changeset (which does not have a good example of a changeset comment), challenging the information it contains.  That should alert that user, but, as I said, they seem to have withdrawn from OpenStreetMap.

As many legitimate public rights of way are not signposted, and, in rural areas, may not even be well maintained, if, when actually seen, it could be taken as a public path, it would be advisable to have signs, at each end, saying it is not for public use.
commented by  (2017-04-23 08:26:19+00:00): The map does not state it to be public, It simply states that it is a footpath.

On what basis are you claiming that it should be access=no? The owners of the gardens probably do not not own the footpath. The fact that it gives access to gardens is not in itself a reason, especially as in this case it also gives access to Bickley Crescent and Clarence avenue. if the footpath has been regularly used by those residents (for 12 years, I beiieve) or by others (for example, as a shortcut to the allotments or Whitehall Recreation Ground) it would most likely have become a public right of way, which would make it defacto a public footpath with access=permissive the correct description.
commented by hadw (2017-04-23 09:12:57+00:00): The default legal status of all land in the UK is private!

The two common arrangements in the UK, for back alleys, are that either the property developer owns the footpath, or that each bordering property owns the part of the footpath adjacent to their property, up to the mid-line.  The latter can be better, as tracing the current owner can be difficult if the property owner went out of business, and it may be necessary to pay the Crown to regain full control.

In all cases, there should be a right of way included in the title deeds of all the properties that benefit from the path.  Typically this will give the occupants of that property the right to pass and re-pass in particular ways (e.g. on foot, or with a vehicle)  for the purposes of using the garage.  Typically, especially with dead ends, the right of way only extends to that part of the path that actually needs to be used to reach the garage in question. (I live in a block of flats and my lease doesn't even given me the right to use the stairs above the level of my flat.)

There should be a corresponding easement, or easements, in the title deeds of the property/ies that own the path or parts of it.

The original reporter sounds like they may have such a right of way, and ought to be able to detail the exact ownership type and extent of the right of way in this case.  If they are reading this, they might also want to take the above response to my comment as an indication as to why, with the OpenStreetMap community, the only safe approach is to use an explicit private property sign.  Once you have that sign, you can use the "what's on the ground principle" to your advantage.

In OpenStreetMap, omitting an access tag indicates more than existence; it indicates that feature has the default access permissions for the type of feature in the country in which it appears.  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#United_Kingdom  For a highway=footway (which is legally a footpath, in this case, as footway is the UK English for sidewalk), that access is foot=yes and everything else no..  As it can be very difficult to establish exactly what is a public right of way in the UK, access=yes tends to be a mix of public right of way and permissive access.  The latter is where the landowner, in practice, doesn't object, but could remove permission at any time (and may do so for one day every few years).  Most paths in public parks are in this category.

Even if the a default access weren't part of the definition, routing software, in practice, applies such defaults, so without a restrictive tag, will route people down this path if if it the quickest route.

One other issue is is this actually a footpath, or is it intended to provide vehicle access to the garages?  If the latter is the case, it should be highway=service, not highway=footway.

For more information on the UK situation with regard to ownership of such alleys, Google for "alley gating" as the ownership is one of the issues that must be addressed before security gates can legally be added to an alley.
opened by Алексей1988 (2014-09-04 12:41:34+00:00): БелМаркет
opened by  (2014-09-04 12:42:07+00:00): Dies ist nur ein Gebäude und es hat die Hausnummer 74.
closed by pyram (2014-09-08 14:50:48+00:00): Danke. Dabei auch weitere Adressen im Umfeld korrigiert.
opened by Paul Berry (2014-09-04 12:51:38+00:00): Bus routing around Sheepcscar Interchange needs fixing.
commented by Paul Berry (2014-09-04 15:55:51+00:00): Routes:
FWY 12
YRL 781
2
3 & 3A
35
36
45
48
71
closed by Paul Berry (2014-09-05 12:35:24+00:00): Resolved in changeset 25247292.
opened by  (2014-09-04 12:53:49+00:00): Proibido virar à esquerda
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
opened by  (2014-09-04 12:53:52+00:00): Falsches Tempolimit. Das gemeldete Tempolimit ist 70 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by luschi (2015-04-27 18:11:42+00:00): Wisepilot report, siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/zarl/diary/23733
opened by  (2014-09-04 12:53:54+00:00): Falsches Tempolimit. Das gemeldete Tempolimit ist 100 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by luschi (2015-04-27 18:11:50+00:00): Wisepilot report, siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/zarl/diary/23733
opened by  (2014-09-04 12:53:56+00:00): Falsches Tempolimit. Das gemeldete Tempolimit ist 50 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by luschi (2015-04-27 18:12:05+00:00): Wisepilot report, siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/zarl/diary/23733
opened by  (2014-09-04 12:54:20+00:00): This footpath and short section of road do not exist on the ground.
closed by JamesKingdom (2017-03-19 17:24:54+00:00): removed
opened by  (2014-09-04 12:56:36+00:00): Falsches Tempolimit. Das gemeldete Tempolimit ist 70 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by luschi (2015-04-27 18:08:41+00:00): hier ist überall 70 eingetragen
opened by  (2014-09-04 12:58:44+00:00): Nesprávný rychlostní limit. Nahlášený rychlostní limit je 100 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by Kamenitxan (2014-09-17 08:22:22+00:00): opraveno
opened by  (2014-09-04 12:58:51+00:00): Avenue Gustave Latinis - Gustave Latinislaan 150, Schaerbeek
commented by  (2014-09-04 13:01:13+00:00): Braakland Josaphat - Friche Josaphat - Wasteland Josaphat
closed by zors1843 (2014-10-08 12:13:34+00:00): is gemapt
opened by Sila1 (2014-09-04 13:03:53+00:00): Аэродром Черноголовка
ГВПП 650x30 курс 120/300 КТА С560124 В0381937 Частота 127,150 МГц
+74957615376
closed by Sila1 (2014-09-04 13:05:33+00:00): www.sila1.ru
opened by -James- (2014-09-04 13:04:17+00:00): Надо поправить дороги
opened by GRISuSI (2014-09-04 13:04:23+00:00): Lage des Hauses geschätzt, da noch nicht in der Liegenschaftskarte. Hausnummer 23a
commented by  (2015-10-13 19:01:49+00:00): 23a grenzt direkt an 23. Mittlerweile in der Liegenschaftskarte.
closed by Hillhome (2016-02-20 13:33:47+00:00): erledigt
opened by LB_Manzano (2014-09-04 13:10:17+00:00): Ho inserito layer=-1 per il sottopassaggio indicato. Visto che la strada SP79-SR56 per un lungo tratto è sopraelevata rispetto al terreno circostante di 1-2 metri, dovrebbe avere layer=1?
closed by LB_Manzano (2014-09-05 20:42:00+00:00): Risolto con una diversa consultazione del wiki. Scusate.
closed by Mauro1985 (2014-09-11 00:13:19+00:00): Potresti aggiungere il tag embankment=yes 
Vedi http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:embankment
opened by  (2014-09-04 13:15:48+00:00): Domaine Marie Bérénice
1826 route du Grand Vallat
83330 Le Castellet
commented by JBacc1 (2014-09-04 16:32:49+00:00): Laquelle des maisons ? J'ai ajouté celles du coin.
closed by JBacc1 (2014-10-10 14:30:10+00:00): Sans réponse
opened by hovard (2014-09-04 13:20:55+00:00): Zabor76.com
commented by  (2017-04-06 23:00:50+00:00): ну ты и пидорас
opened by  (2014-09-04 13:21:49+00:00): Der Knoten http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/208925006
"Alter Bahnhof" ist wohl versehentlich verrutscht
commented by aseerel4c26 (2014-09-04 22:52:32+00:00): Hmm, danke, aber wieso glaubst du das? Ist das Restaurant an der von dir markierten Stelle? Warst du vor Ort? Kennst du das Restaurant?
commented by  (2014-09-05 09:53:59+00:00): Danke für die Nachfrage. Ja das Restaurant ist an der markierten Stelle (und auch besagter Knoten war ursprünglich dort). Ja ich war vor Ort (muss aber zugeben, dass ich nicht explizit drauf geachtet habe). Und ja, ich kenne auch das Restaurant von innen: Nicht ganz billig, aber geschmacklich zu empfehlen ;-)

Ganz abgesehen davon ist auf der Website http://www.alter-bahnhof.eu/ das Gebäude gut zu erkennen.
closed by aseerel4c26 (2014-09-06 18:50:07+00:00): Danke sehr! Ich habe mir die Sache näher angeschaut und konnte es nachvollziehen. In der Tat scheint das dann wohl ein Versehen gewesen zu sein. Ein Änderungskommentar wurde nicht angegeben und die restlichen Änderungen betreffen Bahnstreckendetails. Ich habe es rückgängig gemacht ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25273192 ).

Wenn du herausfindest wo ein "Knoten" vorher war, dann scheinst du dich doch schon recht gut hier auszukennen. Wieso änderst du es nicht gleich selbst (natürlich mit erklärendem Kommentar beim Speichern). Kann ich dir etwas erklären? Das dann bitte per OSM-Mail an mich (dazu musst du dich natürlich anmelden).
closed by aseerel4c26 (2014-09-06 18:54:46+00:00): Achja, dem Bearbeiter, dem das angenommene Versehen unterlaufen ist, habe ich zur Sicherheit eine Notiz-Mail mit Verweis hier her geschickt.
opened by  (2014-09-04 13:26:34+00:00): Die Kapelle heisst "Josefskapelle", nicht Jakobs-
closed by Notaris (2014-09-07 14:45:25+00:00): Am 04.09. von joeste in Changeset #25236129 erledigt
opened by  (2014-09-04 13:33:32+00:00): Giro no permitido: No giro a la izquierda
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
opened by Javier Sanchez (2014-09-04 13:33:41+00:00): Revisar nombre de la calle
closed by Kizar (2015-02-23 23:08:11+00:00): revisada.
opened by Javier Sanchez (2014-09-04 13:33:57+00:00): Revisar nombre del callejón.
closed by Javier Sanchez (2017-12-26 13:45:51+00:00): Segunda transversal la Libertad
opened by Javier Sanchez (2014-09-04 13:34:23+00:00): Revisar nombre del callejón.
closed by Kizar (2015-02-23 23:08:17+00:00): revisada.
opened by  (2014-09-04 13:35:38+00:00): Limite de velocidade incorreto. O limite de velocidade informado é 15 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
opened by  (2014-09-04 13:37:08+00:00): Zakaz skrętu w lewo
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by Zmianowy (2014-12-10 12:36:23+00:00): Oznaczyłem jednokierunkową
opened by -James- (2014-09-04 13:39:05+00:00): Отметка магазина задвоена
opened by SomeoneElse (2014-09-04 13:43:02+00:00): There are a bunch of unconnected cycleways around this roundabout.  Needs a survey to figure out the best way to connect them.
commented by Mex (2025-01-30 10:25:56+00:00): this looks reasonable for whats on the ground based on sat image
opened by  (2014-09-04 13:44:12+00:00): Filiale Post ist umgezogen und nun in der Passage Dessauer Straße 5.
opened by  (2014-09-04 13:44:50+00:00): Hermes-Paket-Shop ist nicht mehr im Netto-Markt.
opened by  (2014-09-04 13:46:29+00:00): Limite de velocidade incorreto. O limite de velocidade informado é 60 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
opened by  (2014-09-04 13:49:25+00:00): Incorrect speed limit. Reported speed limit is 95 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by compdude (2014-09-17 22:52:14+00:00): Well, that's roughly equivalent to 60 mph, and I can say without a doubt that that is the speed limit here.
opened by  (2014-09-04 13:50:20+00:00): Woodend Bridge
commented by  (2014-09-04 13:50:48+00:00): Woodend Bridge
commented by marscot (2014-12-21 09:47:48+00:00): would need more info on this, the road bridge is mapped, it this a footbridge?
closed by Hobgoblin (2017-07-13 20:30:11+00:00): No, it's an unclassified road with no pavements.  I can't find any other source for the name, but it looks plausible.
opened by  (2014-09-04 13:51:17+00:00): Freiraumgalerie Halle - ein in den Außmaßen einzigartiges Projekt in Europa, bei dem Künstler leerstehende Häuser mittels Graffitis und Farbe gestalten.
opened by  (2014-09-04 13:51:39+00:00): Woodend Bridge
closed by marscot (2014-12-31 16:35:04+00:00): name now added
opened by  (2014-09-04 13:52:43+00:00): fIRST NOTE
opened by SomeoneElse (2014-09-04 13:53:26+00:00): (a) Is this really a footbridge?  It doesn't look like it from the imagery

(b) Is there really public access to it?
closed by Mex (2024-01-11 15:04:33+00:00): a PROW crosses here according to the PROW layer so I expect this is correct.
opened by freeExec (2014-09-04 13:55:46+00:00): 4 109-144
opened by  (2014-09-04 13:58:46+00:00): Bendra žemėlapio klaida:
neatitinka adresasas
 stoties 32
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
opened by  (2014-09-04 14:01:50+00:00): Proibido virar à esquerda
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
opened by  (2014-09-04 14:11:40+00:00): Límite de velocidad incorrecto. El límite de velocidad informado es 120 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by cronoser (2014-12-04 22:35:32+00:00): spam
opened by s-jordan (2014-09-04 14:25:48+00:00): Momentan Einbahnstraße, Fahrtrichtung nur Richtung Westen erlaubt
opened by s-jordan (2014-09-04 14:25:48+00:00): Neuapostolische Kirche
opened by s-jordan (2014-09-04 14:25:49+00:00): Brücke
opened by -James- (2014-09-04 14:28:10+00:00): Река течёт в гору.
opened by Open Source Fan (2014-09-04 14:28:12+00:00): kann man eine verschlossene Hütte als Schutzhütte bezeichnen? Ich finde nicht. Kann bei Wanderern zu Verwirrung führen.
closed by morryis (2016-09-25 18:16:38+00:00): I changed Hällerstugan to tourism=mountain_hut
opened by  (2014-09-04 14:30:56+00:00): chata Ždáň
closed by Jezevec (2020-11-25 11:59:18+00:00): Tady je tak max pole.
opened by s8huth (2014-09-04 14:36:07+00:00): here is a ferry.
closed by BáthoryPéter (2014-09-04 21:06:59+00:00): Already mapped: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196115844
opened by s8huth (2014-09-04 14:36:07+00:00): here should be a ferry line
closed by BáthoryPéter (2014-09-04 21:06:06+00:00): It's there: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172711201
Do you have some extra information about the ferry?
opened by  (2014-09-04 14:37:55+00:00): Die Firma heißt: Heuchemer
closed by Der Harry (2014-11-17 09:08:10+00:00): OK erledigt.
opened by  (2014-09-04 14:41:47+00:00): Der Streckenverlauf in Miehlen ist m.E. nicht zutreffend. Gekennzeichnet ist die Lage des alten Bahnhofes; die eingezeichnete Strecke liegt zu weit weg davon.
commented by Prince Kassad (2015-08-22 19:23:39+00:00): warum ist die Bahnstrecke überhaupt eingezeichnet, wenn es offensichtlich keinerlei Spuren von ihr mehr gibt? Wie sind hier bei OpenStreetMap und nicht bei OpenHistoryMap.
commented by Cachologe (2015-11-17 13:00:28+00:00): Die Strecke scheint von einer ungenauen historischen Karte abgezeichnet worden zu sein. Sie verlief z.B. auch nicht in Nastätten DURCH das damalige Gaswerk oder die Rosenmühle, welche beide schon existierten. Der Track liegt außerdem teils weit ab von noch existierenden Resten.
commented by  (2015-11-20 09:13:02+00:00): Diskussion im Forum (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=52711)
closed by Cachologe (2015-11-20 10:38:45+00:00): Nach bestem Wissen und Gewissen habe ich den Track von Miehlen bis Nastätten verbessert. Er führt nun über noch heute sichtbare Reste und auch am Miehlener Bahnhof vorbei.
opened by Rogehm (2014-09-04 14:47:47+00:00): Bitte, wer Zeit hat, hier den neuen "Super"-ALDI mit verspiegelter Außenwand mappen.
Der ist ab heute eröffnet!
closed by Raymond (2015-06-03 08:13:37+00:00): Ein Aldi wurde von einem anderen Mapper eingetragen.
opened by village (2014-09-04 14:53:54+00:00): ist hier noch ein Haus mit einer Adresse? (bing undeutlich, vor Ort pruefen)
commented by village (2014-10-04 09:41:58+00:00): da stehen 2 Lauben drauf
commented by  (2015-01-02 23:24:22+00:00): das lässt sich doch erahnen anhand der 2-3 Ecken.
Bemühe dich ein bisschen
commented by  (2015-01-22 15:15:47+00:00): gehört zum Gartenverein, die Hausnummern 27 - 33 sind nicht vergeben
closed by Neudrino (2015-02-07 13:03:03+00:00): Die Lauben sind sowieso alle nicht gemappt.
Schließe das mal, da genau genommen kein Fehler.
opened by  (2014-09-04 14:56:07+00:00): bounds: (40.7345,-73.7011 - 40.7271,-73.6803)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?box=yes&notes=yes&bbox=-73.7011%2C40.7271%2C-73.6803%2C40.7345
the address says South Fourth Street and I just live on 4th street - so, it's totally wrong neighborhood
first time I had this problem
closed by andrewpmk (2014-09-05 17:02:43+00:00): This is probably correct
opened by  (2014-09-04 15:14:47+00:00): kruzni tok
opened by  (2014-09-04 15:16:57+00:00): bounds: (49.1382,-122.3211 - 49.1255,-122.2795)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?box=yes&notes=yes&bbox=-122.3211%2C49.1255%2C-122.2795%2C49.1382
Map is showing wrong data here. it is on a corner Murray St.and 2nd Ave.,Mission,BC
closed by Alan Trick (2014-09-22 01:34:28+00:00): Comment not helpful
opened by  (2014-09-04 15:23:04+00:00):  Saint coeur - ain ebel
opened by EdLoach (2014-09-04 15:28:36+00:00): Bricked up alley which became one side of this shop unit now confirmed as public footpath. Today's paper say it could take up to 15 months to reopen the alley though. Survey at intervals to check, then add footpath. http://www.clactonandfrintongazette.co.uk/news/clacton_frinton_news/10499338.Battle_won_to_re_open_bricked_up_alleyway/ relates.
commented by EdLoach (2015-05-01 07:53:09+00:00): http://www.clactonandfrintongazette.co.uk/news/12920670.Bricked_up_town_centre_alleyway_to_be_opened_again_after_shop_owner_loses_appeal/
commented by EdLoach (2015-09-15 08:02:54+00:00): Today's paper reports it has re-opened. Survey to check.
closed by EdLoach (2015-11-26 15:52:11+00:00): Added, after walking through it and back
opened by andrewpmk (2014-09-04 15:39:23+00:00): Does Urbwek Lane exist or is it badly misaligned?
commented by HeyItsAdam (2020-02-16 20:23:46+00:00): There's an Urbwek Lane just east of this note. Not sure if this the name of it, but there's definitely a road here, so I don't see any misalignment.
closed by DUGA (2022-12-24 15:22:14+00:00): No such thing, removed.
opened by mqueme (2014-09-04 15:58:18+00:00): Start here
closed by EdLoach (2014-09-04 16:32:11+00:00): OpenStreetMap notes are intended to make notes about items missing from the map, or that need correcting. http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ might be more what you are looking for?
opened by gps and security (2014-09-04 15:59:11+00:00): villanueva
opened by Amiguss (2014-09-04 16:01:48+00:00): Ten dom ma oznaczenie 52( dom na pn -zach ma nr 115)
closed by Władysław Komorek (2014-09-04 16:36:15+00:00): Jeśli poprawiono, to należy zamknąć.
opened by  (2014-09-04 16:07:59+00:00): كشك
opened by  (2014-09-04 16:11:16+00:00): Allée Ur Geldi
closed by JBacc1 (2014-09-05 12:24:53+00:00): C'est-à-dire ?
closed by JBacc1 (2014-09-05 12:25:19+00:00): Je voulais dire : comme ça ?