piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
commented by HirschKauz (2020-05-05 13:28:32+00:00): habe mir das heute mal angeguckt weil ich die Notiz weg haben möchte :-) die Grünanlage ist ein mit Ziegelsteinen umfasster kreisförmiger Platz, mit zwei Bänken und einem Mülleimer, der nur von dem oberen Teil zwischen beiden Treppen zu erreichen ist. gelegen geschätzt 8 m über den Wegen drumherum. ich werde versuchen das nachher am PC zu mapen
closed by HirschKauz (2020-05-11 12:48:56+00:00): grummelgrummel das kommt davon wenn man an mehrerereren Geräten fummelt und dadurch in mehreren Digitalwelten paralleluniversal hochläd  
Nun aber - Note zu und feddisch
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:38:36+00:00): ca. hier, Amtsgericht
closed by hsc666 (2015-04-23 17:52:54+00:00): ist auch schon drin
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:40:16+00:00): Bahnsteige wie in Glesch jeweils in Fahrtrichtung hinter dem Bahnübergang
commented by  (2015-04-06 22:16:48+00:00): stimmt, ich würde die Markierung des BF genau auf den Schnittpunkt zur Straße setzen
closed by HirschKauz (2020-04-30 12:40:26+00:00): Es sind (wie auf der Karte auch eingezeichnet) 2 Bahnsteige - btw: was heißt in Fahrtrichtung??  Steuerbord von vorne nach weiter? ;-) (kleiner Scherz - ich bevorzuge Nord Ost Süd West)
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:40:51+00:00): Sitio de reunión
closed by AngocA (2015-12-27 03:25:08+00:00): What does this note mean?
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:41:43+00:00): barrierefreie und Treppen-Unterführung
commented by  (2015-07-21 11:30:19+00:00): stimmt
closed by chris2map (2015-11-19 17:36:20+00:00): Ist bereits erledigt. Wurde vor ca. 11 Monaten eingetragen.
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:41:48+00:00): Pasaje Rincón de Los Zorzales
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:42:19+00:00): Calle Del Valle
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:42:23+00:00): Rewe
commented by  (2015-07-21 11:29:58+00:00): Ist schon wieder überholt
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:42:46+00:00): Feil fartsgrense. Rapportert fartsgrense er 50 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by forteller (2024-01-05 21:58:25+00:00): 60 er riktig nå
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:43:13+00:00): Feil fartsgrense. Rapportert fartsgrense er 50 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by forteller (2024-01-05 22:00:38+00:00): 60 er riktig nå
opened by andrewpmk (2014-08-25 20:44:10+00:00): turn lanes
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:44:53+00:00): Hamburgers here!
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:45:41+00:00): Gleis 19...
closed by Spezialist (2015-04-03 19:48:26+00:00): Die Plattform ist mit 19 referenziert, ich kann kein Fehler feststellen. Ich schliesse mal diesen Fehler weil er auch schon 1/2 Jahr alt ist.
opened by andrewpmk (2014-08-25 20:46:22+00:00): turn lanes
closed by Rps333 (2020-11-28 12:55:11+00:00): old
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:46:45+00:00): Nessuna svolta a sinistra
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by stoerti (2014-11-08 18:09:15+00:00): ich weiss nicht, was er will aber ich fahre dort täglich her, dort sehe ich keinen fehler
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:46:50+00:00): Limite di velocità non corretto. Il limite di velocità segnalato è 40 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by stoerti (2014-11-08 18:09:27+00:00): also da auf der Autobahn ist ganz sicher keine vMax = 40 - allerdings wird dort überall gebaut, vielleicht war das mal temporär
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:46:54+00:00): Limite di velocità non corretto. Il limite di velocità segnalato è 20 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by stoerti (2014-11-08 18:08:33+00:00): also da auf der Autobahn ist ganz sicher keine vMax = 20 - allerdings wird dort überall gebaut, vielleicht war das mal temporär
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:47:57+00:00): No left turn
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:48:18+00:00): Incorrect speed limit. Reported speed limit is 20 mph
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
opened by sedort1 (2014-08-25 20:48:45+00:00): улица павлика морозова
opened by sedort1 (2014-08-25 20:49:45+00:00): клубный переулок
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:49:58+00:00): ??
commented by  (2014-09-21 10:39:59+00:00): Что имелось в виду? На какую неточность на карте указывается?
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:50:26+00:00): :???
commented by  (2014-09-21 10:40:04+00:00): Что имелось в виду? На какую неточность на карте указывается?
opened by sedort1 (2014-08-25 20:50:33+00:00): измаильская улица
opened by andrewpmk (2014-08-25 20:50:54+00:00): fix trailer park
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:51:14+00:00): Du fait du tracé de la LGV cette route est raccordée à la RD34 à l'est par un nouveau tronçon.
opened by sedort1 (2014-08-25 20:51:16+00:00): переулок суворова
opened by sedort1 (2014-08-25 20:52:17+00:00): переулок гастелло
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:52:36+00:00): Pin for this address should be located at this location.
closed by neuhausr (2014-08-26 21:07:54+00:00): closing because not enough info--desired address is not included
opened by sedort1 (2014-08-25 20:52:42+00:00): переулок щорса, нарисовать
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:53:05+00:00): erenfidan
closed by Dropman (2014-10-09 05:45:44+00:00): Edited.
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:53:31+00:00): Hausnummer: 18
opened by sedort1 (2014-08-25 20:54:24+00:00): переулок щорса
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:54:26+00:00): Ampel geplant
commented by PeWue (2015-02-24 23:57:53+00:00): Danke fuer den Hinweis, aber in OSM eintragen kann man sie erst, wenn sie wirklich existiert.
commented by  (2016-04-08 16:36:54+00:00): Die Ampelanlage ist fertig und aktiv. Sie betrifft aber nur die Linksabbieger von Koslar Richtung Jülich und den Geradeausverkehr von Jülich in Richtung Aldenhoven.
commented by  (2016-04-08 16:40:45+00:00): P.S.: Sie ist dementsprechend als Bedarfsampel ausgelegt.
closed by PeWue (2016-04-10 01:36:43+00:00): Ist vor ein paar Tagen eingetragen worden.
commented by PeWue (2016-04-10 23:10:13+00:00): Das passt aber noch nicht ganz. Man kann offenbar von Koslar auch ein Stueck vor der Ampel nach Juelich links abbiegen, ohne die Ampel zu nutzen.
Muss also nochmal hin...
Was heisst 'Bedarfsampel'? Wird sie schwarz, wenn keine Fahrzeuge da sind? Ich habe sie nur in Aktion gesehen.
commented by  (2016-04-12 17:03:58+00:00): Sie ist die ganze Zeit in Aktion, springt aber nur um, sobald ein Fahrzeug von Koslar Richtung Jülich abbiegen will. Die Fahrspuren sind hier aber nicht richtig eingetragen. Der Verkehr von Aldenhoven Richtung Jülich hat eine separate Spur, ist somit nicht von der Ampel betroffen. Die Fahrspur der Linksabbieger von Koslar Richtung Jülich ist von dieser anderen Fahrspur baulich durch kleine Betonwandelemente (ca. 50cm hoch) auf einer Länge von schätzungsweise 50 getrennt. Die Fahrspuren verlaufen weiter parallel bis zur eingezeichneten Abbiegung am Kreisverkehr.
commented by  (2016-04-12 17:16:01+00:00): Hier auf dem Foto im Bericht sieht man den Bereich von Aldenhoven kommend aus. http://www.aachener-zeitung.de/meinung/lesermeinung/unfallkreuzung-koenigshaeuschen-1.764704
commented by  (2016-05-02 06:29:49+00:00): Auf dieser Seite kann man ein bisschen erkennen, allerdings noch ohne Ampel (Suche nach "8.Afslag naar Koslar") https://www.wegenforum.nl/viewtopic.php?t=19198
closed by PeWue (2016-07-02 22:54:33+00:00): Sollte jetzt komplett sein.
opened by sedort1 (2014-08-25 20:54:47+00:00): переулок воровского
opened by sedort1 (2014-08-25 20:54:57+00:00): улица воровского
opened by sedort1 (2014-08-25 20:55:09+00:00): бугская улица
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:56:30+00:00): ew no left from right turn ramps
commented by andrewpmk (2014-08-25 21:10:21+00:00): also turn lanes
opened by sedort1 (2014-08-25 20:56:33+00:00): майская улица
opened by  (2014-08-25 20:56:33+00:00): genaueres Aussehen wie auf https://sdnetrim.kdvz-frechen.de/rim4240/sdnetrim/Lh0LgvGcu9To9Sm0Nl.HayEYv8Tq8Sj1Kg1HauCWqBZo5Ok6KfyIeuDWsESn4Rk4Te.JayCXuCWn4Oi0Lg-IbvDauHTp8To1Ok0HbwHau8Vt6Pi7Kj2GJ/Anlage_1.pdf
closed by Parzelle13 (2018-05-06 11:12:12+00:00): Da der angegebene Link nicht mehr erreichbar ist, erledigt.
opened by sedort1 (2014-08-25 20:57:09+00:00): партизанский переулок
opened by sedort1 (2014-08-25 20:58:38+00:00): улица водная
opened by sedort1 (2014-08-25 20:58:50+00:00): улица адмирала макарова
opened by  (2014-08-25 21:00:44+00:00): Droga 254 od Wiecanowa biegnie przez centrum Mogilna aż do ulic Poznańskiej i dalej w kierunku Wylatowa, aż do DK 15. Zaznaczony przez PAństwa fragment drogi biegnącej od Wiecanowa przez Bąbowo i Świerkówiec to obwodnica Mogilna a nie DW 254.
closed by deleted_account (2014-08-25 21:22:07+00:00): poprawione
opened by  (2014-08-25 21:02:26+00:00): Bar
commented by  (2014-08-25 21:03:42+00:00): Bar
commented by jaakkoh (2014-10-27 17:33:34+00:00): Y qual es el nombre de este bar?
closed by MrRoqoto (2015-07-20 19:28:18+00:00): no more information provided
opened by  (2014-08-25 21:02:33+00:00): Familienbauernhof Strassbauer
http://www.strassbauer.at/
Christian und Susanne Lothspieler
Zehethof 7, 3261 Steinakirchen am Forst
Tel. +43 660 3471470
closed by BearT (2014-08-26 06:32:02+00:00): Danke. Ist jetzt eingetragen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300174408
opened by shorty66 (2014-08-25 21:07:10+00:00): ridtorante pizzeria mühle is non-existant
commented by  (2014-09-09 07:07:20+00:00): The restaurant does exist!
closed by jottlieb (2015-09-01 14:46:40+00:00): Restaurant existiert an diesem Ort anscheinend noch.
opened by  (2014-08-25 21:08:38+00:00): universidad
opened by  (2014-08-25 21:13:14+00:00): Limite de velocidade incorreto. O limite de velocidade informado é 105 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
opened by Xapitoun (2014-08-25 21:13:32+00:00): n 19 et champs elysees magasin
opened by Xapitoun (2014-08-25 21:13:54+00:00): n 19 et champs elysees magasin
opened by  (2014-08-25 21:15:04+00:00): Incorrect speed limit. Reported speed limit is 30 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by rehan727 (2016-10-15 10:03:26+00:00): added maxaspeed=30
opened by AndersAndersson (2014-08-25 21:19:07+00:00): Finns båda dessa stigar här eller är det oprecis GPS-signal som ligger bakom?
closed by AndersAndersson (2017-05-05 12:31:53+00:00): Endast en stig finns. Felaktig stig borttagen eftr survey.
opened by Franco Dei Tos (2014-08-25 21:19:34+00:00): Pian de l'erba
commented by DarkSwan_Import (2014-08-26 22:00:10+00:00): È una località?
commented by  (2014-08-27 11:31:07+00:00): E' una zona tipo pascolo ben delimitato perché tutto piano del tipo Pian Cansiglio in più piccolo. Per questo è sempre stata chiamata da secoli  Pian de l'erba. Ci sono qualche "baite-casere" che delimitano la zona. Ci possiedo una "casetta" .  Su certe cartine è anche segnalata.
commented by  (2014-08-27 21:38:09+00:00): In base alla tua descrizione, credo che la zona debba essere segnalata. Ho aggiunto un place=locality per segnalarla, a breve sarà renderizzata sulla mappa. Grazie della segnalazione!
opened by  (2014-08-25 21:25:28+00:00): No giro a la izquierda
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
opened by  (2014-08-25 21:26:50+00:00): Missing John Muir Memorial County Park
closed by MidwestMapGeek (2014-10-19 02:17:13+00:00): Added.
opened by  (2014-08-25 21:27:07+00:00): Missing Fox River National Wildlife Refuge
opened by  (2014-08-25 21:33:46+00:00): Kruhový objezd
closed by Jose Riha (2014-11-25 15:54:53+00:00): uz tam je
opened by  (2014-08-25 21:35:44+00:00): خطأ في الخريطة: خروج غير صحيح:
الرجو إصلاح الخطاء في الخريطة 
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
opened by  (2014-08-25 21:41:16+00:00): Linea Móvil
opened by  (2014-08-25 21:42:47+00:00): Proibido virar à esquerda
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
opened by andrewpmk (2014-08-25 21:44:46+00:00): Burger King head office near here - 5505 Blue Lagoon Drive
closed by maxolasersquad (2014-09-17 01:51:01+00:00): Added in commit 25491571.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25491571
opened by  (2014-08-25 21:47:32+00:00): Interdiction de tourner à gauche
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
opened by BrunAlbi (2014-08-25 21:55:18+00:00): Présence d'un chemin privé rejoignant la rue Guynemer.
opened by  (2014-08-25 21:55:20+00:00): ¿Puticlub?
closed by cronoser (2014-08-26 12:33:34+00:00): no se visualiza nada
opened by  (2014-08-25 22:03:25+00:00): No giro a la izquierda
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
commented by Barretina (2014-08-30 18:28:52+00:00): Corretgit sentit del carrer de sant genís i tram de la bv-5306. Sembla suficient per arreclar l'enrutament aquí però no sé a quina intersecció exactament correspon aquesta nota, la deixo no resolta.
opened by  (2014-08-25 22:07:36+00:00): I think there is a missing way here connecting the south-bound carriageway of Kew Bridge Road to Lionel Road South allowing south-bound vehicles to turn right into it.
closed by alexmuller (2017-12-26 11:04:39+00:00): This right turn is now possible using GraphHopper and Mapzen so I think it's been resolved
opened by andrewpmk (2014-08-25 22:07:52+00:00): to west is a bike path on side of road, not a bike lane
closed by Rps333 (2014-08-26 23:45:34+00:00): Nope. see http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/La-sNHNuN39iGzGrkuK7nQ
reopened by andrewpmk (2014-08-29 02:01:57+00:00): Huh? Looks like an off road bike path separated by a curb. Look closely
commented by Rps333 (2014-09-13 16:04:24+00:00): Hi. just drove by. On the north side there is no bike path. Just a sidewalk.
opened by  (2014-08-25 22:13:37+00:00): Евроопт
opened by  (2014-08-25 22:16:52+00:00): Should this section of Gunnersbury Avenue be marked one-way? This road is two-way normally.
closed by hadw (2014-09-28 11:24:28+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25723239
opened by  (2014-08-25 22:20:56+00:00): This footpath continues to the north, then east, between the Copland Community School grounds and the playing fields, to join the footpath that continues north to join High Road.
commented by hadw (2014-08-27 21:16:58+00:00): I tend to concur.  In fact, I had marked a fixme on the Northern path some time ago, to check whether it connected through.
closed by hadw (2015-01-10 10:27:02+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28037149
opened by  (2014-08-25 22:21:51+00:00): This footpath continues to the west then south, between the school grounds and the playing fields, to join the footpath that continues south to the end of London Road.
closed by hadw (2015-01-10 10:27:20+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28037149
opened by  (2014-08-25 22:27:29+00:00): حد سرعة غير صحيح. حد السرعة الذي تم الإبلاغ عنه هو 60 km/h
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
commented by  (2018-05-29 06:57:11+00:00): I've been along this road, and can't see an explicit sign saying 60km/h.
closed by Rotilom (2018-11-18 10:27:20+00:00): It's possible that this road was 60 4 years ago, but all the roads in this neighbourhood are now 40, especially with all the schools.

http://product.itoworld.com/map/124?lon=56.35872&lat=25.15134&zoom=14&fullscreen=true#
opened by  (2014-08-25 22:28:56+00:00): This way is also a cyclepath joining Point Place to Tokyngton Avenue.
closed by ika-chan! UK-USA (2014-08-28 17:17:06+00:00): Sorted. It's one step to the left and a ramp in the other. Only motorcyclists are banned. No ban on cyclists were specified there.
commented by hadw (2014-08-31 14:48:42+00:00): But making it a dedicated footway makes it implicitly cycle=no!  When I encountered it, I treated it as cycle=dismount, but I suspect a lot of people treat it as cycle=yes.  The explicit ban on motorcycles also tended to hint that cycles were OK.

I seem to remember that there were some indications that there was a cycle route through it (possibly references to the LCN route to which it connects.
closed by ceirios (2026-07-06 23:25:16+00:00): current mapping looks ok to me, reopen if there's anything to do
opened by  (2014-08-25 22:29:59+00:00): Should this not be Boving*d*on to match the streetname to the northwest?
closed by tomthepom (2015-01-13 19:14:11+00:00): Yes. Checked spelling with Brent council website.
commented by hadw (2015-01-16 16:10:30+00:00): I don't believe that is an allowable source.  The council will hold the copyright on the list of allotments.  There is a lot of other information on their web site, that I'd love to be able use, but can't.
commented by tomthepom (2015-01-19 17:31:18+00:00): A list of allotments is copyrightable, yes, but can you copyright the spelling of the name of a public space?
commented by hadw (2015-01-19 18:41:25+00:00): The nasty thing about database copyrights is that you can breach them by repeated extraction of single facts, not just by bulk copying.

The name of the actual public space is not copyright, but the name in the council database is.  They are not necessarily the same.  Councils have been known to make mistakes; even OS gets names wrong.  If you get the name independently, you are not breaching the copyright.

The reason that database copyrights were introduced was precisely because you couldn't copyright the individual facts that they contain, but there is still real work that has gone into compiling them.  It is not the list as a continuous piece of text that is copyright, but accumulation of some or all of the individual facts that it contains, regardless of the order, and whether or not you only copy part of them.

In the past, at least, paper maps actually had deliberate errors, and phone books had bogus entries, to detect when people were using them as sources for other maps and directories.  I doubt that Brent do that, and they may not even care about the copyright of this particular list, but this is something easy to check on the ground, and not particularly important.  I'll eventually get round to surveying this one myself, so there is no need to test the edges of copyright.

I've not reversed the change, because I think it is very likely to be correct, but I've left this open so that it can be verified by an actual survey.
commented by hadw (2015-05-25 16:29:14+00:00): I failed to find this feature on the ground.

From aerial imagery, it looks like there may be a private drive leading to Bovington Avenue that wasn't obvious when I cycled round the block.  I need to do another check, probably on foot, and looking at where the drive appears to be.

However, I think there is a real chance that this may be unverifiable without either local knowledge or trespass.
closed by Derick Rethans (2015-08-27 11:57:48+00:00): There is a gate near the corner of Bovingdon Avenue and Tokyngton Avenue saying "Bovingdon Avenue Allotments". The path is easy to see on Bing too. I've added the track and the gate. The name had already been changed.
opened by  (2014-08-25 22:32:51+00:00): A footpath leads directly from the end of this cul-de-sac onto Wycombe End.
closed by andrewpmk (2014-09-02 03:35:35+00:00): Added
opened by  (2014-08-25 22:34:09+00:00): A footpath/cyclepath joins the end of this way to the cul-de-sac directly to the south that adjoins Wycombe End.
commented by andrewpmk (2014-09-02 03:36:16+00:00): Looks like a service road, at least part of it
closed by user_2096886 (2015-03-14 16:40:19+00:00): The Spinney and Factory Yard (the cul-de-sac) are connected, but there are bollards that cars cannot cross.
opened by SomeoneElse (2014-08-25 22:41:36+00:00): Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3031611238 really a "leisure=sports_centre" or just some bloke with a mobile phone who happens to frequent a gym?
commented by hadw (2014-08-31 10:53:16+00:00): I would guess the latter.  Personally, I'm not sure that it is useful to add small very small businesses to the map; they are nearly always vanity listings, and tend to be unmaintainable.  However, it is very difficult to challenge a source=personal_knowledge listing like this without an official policy on admissibility of business listings, and the more that OSM gets known, the more businesses will want a "listing".  I'd like a rule that allowed them to be summarily removed, if they are just a one man office, deep in a building.

That means that this note could well end up cluttering the map indefinitely.

What one can definitely say is that most of the tags are invalid in some way, and I consider the use of note to be an abuse.

Unfortunately, I was using a slightly dated hard copy when surveying map notes yesterday afternoon, so I didn't look at this one.  I'm suspecting it is part of LA Fitness, so leisure centre is wrong.  It's probably, at best, an office.  I might be able to refute the leisure centre classification when I next look round there.

Actually, I remember this as an MoD building, but that was a very long time ago.
commented by hadw (2014-08-31 11:23:59+00:00): Incidentally, there is a similar one for a beautician's concession about 15 m to the East!  They even managed to get the address right then break it by moving most of it to a bogus, Street Address tag.  Again they have abused note for a sales pitch.

Unfortunately, no publicity is bad publicity, so adding a map note actually serves the purposes of micro business entries.
commented by hadw (2014-08-31 13:28:23+00:00): Stoneimage's web site indicates there are probably three people (but one phone).  I can't find the information required by the e-commerce directive on their site.  (The site can be easily derived from the email address, so I didn't need to use any search engine database.)

(Using a database, there was a company of that name, registered at a residential address, but it was dissolved a few years ago.  The SIC, though vague, was consistent)

It may well be what Google call a service area business.
closed by hadw (2015-02-28 14:25:30+00:00): Surveyed outside.  The only sports_centre at this location is LA Fitness.  I don't know LA Fitness' business model, so I can't decide whether this is a formal concession, or whether they are actually just an ordinary customer, so I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and assume there is some sort of office here.

Note was pure sales hype, so removed that.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29156453
opened by  (2014-08-25 22:43:09+00:00): Няма ляв завой
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
closed by Veso (2014-08-28 17:50:24+00:00): Invalid
opened by  (2014-08-25 22:45:39+00:00): Turn not allowed: No left turn
 Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
opened by andrewpmk (2014-08-25 22:54:07+00:00): Lake Ontario vanishes from Mapnik at zoom 5
commented by  (2014-11-28 14:34:42+00:00): Lake Ontario is *still* vanishing at zoom 5.
closed by andrewpmk (2015-03-18 17:19:08+00:00): mostly fixed, but Wolfe Island is vanishing
commented by andrewpmk (2015-03-24 00:45:04+00:00): Wolfe Island no longer vanishes, but Lake Ontario vanishes at low zoom again
commented by  (2015-03-30 20:14:10+00:00): This is a rendering issue, not with OSM data. See https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/754
commented by  (2015-08-31 14:00:55+00:00): Whatever the case, the consensus seems to be to tag the North American Great Lakes with natural=coastline

https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/754#issuecomment-49939285

Ontario is missing this tag, at least along the southern shores of the lake.  I'm adding them, starting there.
commented by  (2015-10-07 14:53:14+00:00): worked my way from toronto to hamilton; from niagara falls till the southeast corner of lake ontario
commented by Geography Canada (2016-03-18 21:36:34+00:00): It still transforms into land at map=5... Will this/can this be fixed?
commented by Geography Canada (2016-04-16 17:40:31+00:00): Have you added them yet?
commented by Geography Canada (2016-04-16 21:59:24+00:00): So natural=coastline should be added?
commented by Geography Canada (2016-04-17 00:33:12+00:00): Anyone there?
commented by Geography Canada (2016-04-17 00:33:20+00:00): Hello!
commented by Geography Canada (2016-04-17 00:34:17+00:00): They have not been added.
commented by Geography Canada (2016-04-17 00:36:43+00:00): Should I add them?
closed by Geography Canada (2016-04-17 00:44:32+00:00): Added.
commented by Kevo (2016-04-17 13:58:45+00:00): I don't think should've been done - the coastline tag has been removed from every Great Lake and you've just added it in...
closed by Kevo (2016-04-17 14:07:49+00:00): I've removed the coastline tag to bring it back in line with the rest of the Great Lakes.  A couple of months back they all had their coastline tags removed.

Although I do agree that they GL system is so large they're similar in size/importance to a sea, we should change all of them at once if we do decide to do this.