piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
opened by noliver (2013-05-27 03:36:40+00:00): House has no posted address, need to resurvey.
closed by noliver (2013-05-27 03:40:23+00:00): On second thought, this type of note is way too prominent for this minor notes-to-self, marking resolved.
opened by  (2013-05-27 04:08:42+00:00): bloor to mt pleasant n ramp closed until nov
opened by Nate Wessel (2013-05-27 04:11:59+00:00): I just split out the three CUF sub-neighborhoods, which are really proper neighborhoods for all but technical administrative purposes. Their boundaries are nonetheless clearly defined; same as the boundaries of CUF which was already in the map but split in three at Straight and Ravine Streets.

Can someone please check to make sure I've tagged the boundaries correctly and not left any remains of CUF? All three neighborhoods should still be joined on their common 'operator' CUFNA (the CUF Neighborhood Association).

This was my first time working with boundaries and I'm not completely confident I did it right!
commented by Nate Wessel (2013-05-27 04:16:38+00:00): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CUF,_Cincinnati
closed by Nate Wessel (2013-06-17 03:02:05+00:00): I'm pretty sure I got this correct now :-)
opened by Nate Wessel (2013-05-27 04:15:36+00:00): These county/city administrative boundaries need to be merged, probably right on the river center-line.
opened by Aaron Lidman (2013-05-27 04:33:58+00:00): Alignment fixes needed
opened by Aaron Lidman (2013-05-27 04:35:21+00:00): Alignment fixes needed, some visability
closed by Prince Kassad (2016-05-07 12:27:09+00:00): this would seem to be resolved.
opened by Aaron Lidman (2013-05-27 04:43:25+00:00): Alignment fixes needed
closed by DoubleA (2017-12-01 14:05:34+00:00): Aligned to Bing.
opened by Aaron Lidman (2013-05-27 04:48:10+00:00): All the streets on this island are particularly bad, I wonder if any of the newer TIGER data is any better.
commented by Aaron Lidman (2013-05-27 05:04:59+00:00): Just looked into it, TIGER 2012 is much better aligned.

http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/geo/shapefiles2012/main

Roads -> All Roads -> Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands -> Saipan
commented by Aaron Lidman (2013-05-27 05:19:40+00:00): http://i.imgur.com/F3sfspq.jpg
closed by Prince Kassad (2016-05-07 12:33:53+00:00): seems to be resolved from what I can tell.
opened by maning (2013-05-27 05:27:17+00:00): Extend the Santa Cruz Parish polygon to include buildings here.
commented by maning (2013-05-27 05:27:34+00:00): Parish Pastoral Center building
opened by maning (2013-05-27 05:33:04+00:00): Extend P. Paterno here but assign as footway
opened by Aaron Lidman (2013-05-27 05:38:03+00:00): All of these TIGER roads don't seem to relate to anything on the ground, are they relevant?
commented by Prince Kassad (2015-08-07 14:34:18+00:00): newer versions of TIGER no longer include this island in any shape or form. If I had to guess I'd say this is pre-1981 data that somehow managed to stay in the database until someone discovered and removed it.
closed by Prince Kassad (2015-08-07 14:43:28+00:00): I deleted all the TIGER roads
opened by Aaron Lidman (2013-05-27 05:43:09+00:00): Traceable roads here, coastline could use some fixing up too.
opened by  (2013-05-27 06:26:19+00:00): dikwmou
commented by dcp (2013-07-31 08:38:56+00:00): Please clarify what should be done. i.e. What is Kalavasos, village, street, hotel etc.
opened by literan (2013-05-27 07:59:04+00:00): Есть ли здесь сквозной проезд?
closed by literan (2013-06-10 16:12:53+00:00): нет, на северо-западе стоит шлагбаум
opened by SomeoneElse (2013-05-27 08:06:18+00:00): The road here is untagged.  Is it best described as a service road or a residential road, or something else?  Survey needed.
closed by VehoMMC (2016-11-01 16:50:03+00:00): It's tagged service road and that seems fine to me.
opened by  (2013-05-27 08:08:27+00:00): Hiányzik a teljes Kézműves utca, és a Dolgozó utca nagy része!
closed by grin (2013-06-01 12:31:42+00:00): Felvettem, de a Dolgozó utca közigazgatásilag nem létezik, legalábbis a budapesti rendezési tervben nem szerepel. Klasszis, nem?
opened by  (2013-05-27 08:09:06+00:00): Dobó Katica utca 5.
closed by flaktack (2013-05-29 14:36:28+00:00): Köszi, javítva. :)
opened by  (2013-05-27 08:09:18+00:00): Dobó Katica utca 3.
closed by flaktack (2013-05-29 14:36:39+00:00): Köszi, javítva. :)
opened by  (2013-05-27 08:10:24+00:00): Ez nem József Attila, hanem Dobó Katica, egy U-alakú utca, aminek a másik vége a Dobó Katica 5-nél nyílik a József Attilára!
closed by flaktack (2013-05-29 14:36:54+00:00): Köszi, javítva. :)
opened by  (2013-05-27 08:10:53+00:00): Hiányzik a teljes Berzsenyi utca.
closed by flaktack (2013-05-29 14:52:44+00:00): Köszi, javítva.
opened by SomeoneElse (2013-05-27 08:18:34+00:00): Is it correct that this footpath doesn't join the path here?  Should there be a fence or something?
closed by sinh (2013-12-30 22:27:26+00:00): Closing, as the paths now connect (due to an edit by user mentor).
opened by SomeoneElse (2013-05-27 08:22:20+00:00): Does this footpath join the road?
closed by ika-chan! UK-USA (2013-05-30 11:26:50+00:00): Yes, in effect it does whilst the sidewalk isn't being depicted seperately.
opened by SomeoneElse (2013-05-27 08:23:05+00:00): Does this footpath join the road?
closed by ika-chan! UK-USA (2013-05-30 11:26:56+00:00): Yes, in effect it does whilst the sidewalk isn't being depicted seperately.
opened by SomeoneElse (2013-05-27 08:25:25+00:00): Do these footpaths join in some way?
closed by ika-chan! UK-USA (2013-05-30 11:25:16+00:00): Got it, thanks.
opened by SomeoneElse (2013-05-27 08:27:49+00:00): I suspect that many of the "names" here (e.g. "garage road" are really just descriptions rather than actual street names.  Perhaps someone local could survey to check?
commented by  (2013-07-19 12:29:41+00:00): I don't think there is a official street name for these service roads as they are classed as driveways rather a residential street. There haven't been any signs with them for the last 40 years AFAIK.
    There may be block numbering designations by the operators in this case probably West Berkshire Council: though as yet I haven't had the time to chase them yet.  I thought naming them such made the maps less confusing to use.
  The site down the hill to the north were built and run, along with some of the local houses, by AWE Aldermaston as new housing for the nuclear weapons factory workers.
   It still had MOD and AWE signage actively changed  in the 1980's and has had barriers to stop rat-running and mainly parking along the Garage road.
    I think it is likely that it may still be residuly owned by AWE still that rent them.

My key aim is to put them on the map so they get documented and then if people have higher accuracy positioning than the Bing based photos or wants to expand the use of the data then the bare layout is ready for them and inthe mean time systems like routers get to know about them.
commented by  (2013-07-19 12:30:32+00:00): If there is a tag for notional rather designated name let me know.
commented by Govanus (2013-07-19 12:35:10+00:00): The comments from anonymous at 19 July 2013 12:30 and 12:19 where from me before I'd logged in.
closed by hadw (2013-11-09 22:33:30+00:00): description would appear appropriate for such purpose.
opened by SomeoneElse (2013-05-27 08:29:38+00:00): I suspect that this footpath doesn't match reality (as mapped it suggests that there's no access to the road, whereas I suspect you could actually just step from the pavement onto the road).  Needs survey.
commented by  (2014-08-26 15:54:11+00:00): I think the author was new and didn't know how to define highway areas.  OSM has had differing propsals of how to do them correctly.  This area is very difficult to route padestians from the very narrow footpaths leading away from the roads and the very wide roads so area highways are the only way to avoid needing to bodge the interfaceing between them in an albut standard logical way. scale effects are not helpful.  Some work on defining the areas was started but offset variations and a lack of time and proper survey measurements have delayed this section.  It needs a set of measured refences to under a meter in hoizontal accuracy to be done right.
commented by SomeoneElse (2014-08-26 16:00:14+00:00): In cases of footpaths (sidewalks) that are effectively part of the road, sidewalk=left/right/both is surely the better way to map it?  

I'd also argue that road-as-area mapping isn't something that "works" in OSM yet - we need a different paradigm akin to "river" and "riverbank".
commented by Govanus (2015-10-25 16:14:51+00:00): This area is on a long todo list that is steadly working through the whole estate fixing the old mapping style battle sites and using the now resolved mapping standards for areaisations of highways.
  The problem was one of scale for makeing parking and predestrian to entrance mapping as the sidewalks morph into sidewalks to wide roads and then off into the equivilance of residential roads that the AtoZ has begun to name I think as resdential footpaths (or was it footways?).  The new tagging scheme back then experimental can deal with all this.
commented by SomeoneElse (2015-10-25 19:10:37+00:00): I'm not sure what the "now resolved mapping standards for areaisations of highways." are.  There are at least three "competing standards" - highway with are=yes (which you've used on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244879222 ) , area:highway (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/area:highway ) and landuse=highway (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dhighway , which is a solution to a slightly different problem).  You've gone with area=yes on what is essentially a linear highway=residential .  Unfortunately, this breaks routing (how can a router tell a "genuine" highway area from a fake one like this) and leads to rendering anomalies due to the duplication you've introduced (see http://c.tile.openstreetmap.org/19/260176/174640.png ).  See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area#Highway_areas for why this isn't a good idea.  Personally I'd have thought that mapping as "area:highway" (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/area:highway ) would have been preferable, if only because it wouldn't break anything else.
However, mapping of highway areas is very much in its infancy - I'd suggest it's worth discussing on talk-gb (rather than just in changesets and osm notes) what the best way forward is.
Cheers,
Andy
closed by RobJN (2023-01-22 01:00:24+00:00): This thread is quite old and highway area mapping has moved to area:highway=* since the initial mapping. We also now have OSM UK cadastral parcel layer. So I have updated the mapping here to reflect both.
opened by johanemilsson (2013-05-27 08:53:17+00:00): Vandalisering
closed by rasmusv (2013-05-28 09:59:21+00:00): Hej Johan,

Godt du så det så hurtigt! Jeg har kontaktet OSM og forventer en snarligt fuld tilbagerulning og ban af brugeren. Ret ikke i data, det komplicerer bare tilbagerulningen.

Mvh.
Rasmus
opened by  (2013-05-27 09:05:04+00:00): Wachthaus, niedergebrannt
http://www.gmuender-tagespost.de/670854
opened by  (2013-05-27 09:15:55+00:00): Ist hier wirklich eine Brücke?
closed by pitscheplatsch (2013-05-27 10:11:44+00:00): Danke, wurde geaendert, vgl. http://www.osm.org/browse/changeset/16307469
opened by  (2013-05-27 09:32:02+00:00): Vialand
http://www.vialand.com.tr/alisveris
commented by  (2013-05-27 09:32:12+00:00): http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/istanbul-gets-its-own-disneyland-on-the-golden-horn.aspx?pageID=238&nID=47648&NewsCatID=341
opened by SomeoneElse (2013-05-27 09:46:58+00:00): This car park has all been drawn as one way, meaning that routers will struggle with it.  Ideally it should be several non-overlapping ways.
closed by SomeoneElse (2013-06-26 19:17:13+00:00): Fixed by BCNorwich - thanks!
opened by SomeoneElse (2013-05-27 09:48:39+00:00): These two car parks also have been drawn as one way each, meaning that routers will struggle with it. Ideally it should be several non-overlapping ways.
closed by SomeoneElse (2013-06-26 19:17:07+00:00): Fixed by BCNorwich - thanks!
opened by  (2013-05-27 10:39:27+00:00): Via puglia
commented by Germano Massullo (2013-08-16 07:04:02+00:00): cosa
opened by  (2013-05-27 10:46:28+00:00): Естакаду відкрили 26 травня.
closed by int_ua (2013-05-29 01:27:00+00:00): прибрав construction, приєднав до інших доріг
opened by  (2013-05-27 11:31:03+00:00): llbk
closed by pitscheplatsch (2013-05-27 20:29:44+00:00): Unhelpful comment
opened by  (2013-05-27 11:58:03+00:00): gbfghfgh
opened by  (2013-05-27 12:51:43+00:00): poubelle de  recyclage
closed by pyrenours (2013-09-03 13:49:06+00:00): ajoutée
opened by Preferred (2013-05-27 13:06:05+00:00): Do Plum Lane and Wren Lane exist?  They were Tiger imported roads but are not visible on Bing aerial nor exist in Tiger 2012.
closed by neuhausr (2013-05-31 04:15:08+00:00): Removed Plum and Wren Lanes--no evidence of their currently existing
opened by antecessor (2013-05-27 13:13:47+00:00): Dí a resolver por probar pero no he hecho nada. Habría que resolverlo. Perdón!
closed by dalop (2013-07-17 18:03:56+00:00): tranquilo que la nota esta puesta principalmente para probar el nuevo sistema de notas :)
opened by  (2013-05-27 13:32:35+00:00): Dadouar
commented by  (2017-06-03 09:00:22+00:00): а
commented by  (2017-06-03 09:00:23+00:00): о
opened by  (2013-05-27 13:34:36+00:00): Dadouar
closed by zluuzki (2023-10-28 20:17:48+00:00): added
opened by  (2013-05-27 13:34:41+00:00): This is number 53 (Sacrower Allee)
closed by Klumbumbus (2013-06-03 17:22:31+00:00): Thanks. Added.
opened by  (2013-05-27 13:39:55+00:00): bounds: (43.2424,-77.6889 - 43.2353,-77.6681)
Map is showing wrong data here. Parkland School Road, as shown, is actually Affinity Lane. Parkland School Road is the stub shown just to the east. Thank you.
opened by  (2013-05-27 14:26:32+00:00): Existiert diese Straße wirklich? Ist sie neu gebaut worden?
commented by  (2013-05-31 18:26:34+00:00): Laut diverser Luftbilder existiert dieser Weg nur als begraster Feldweg.  Von Richtung Baudenhardweg (ja -weg nicht -straße (das ist ein Fehler)), sieht es aber danach aus als ob die Straße vorbereitet für zukünftigen Bau ist. Jemand aus der Gegend sollte sich die Sache mal angucken, bzw. seine Kenntnis kund tun.
closed by pyram (2013-06-04 22:40:31+00:00): Straßenname und Weiteres ergänzt/korrigiert
opened by  (2013-05-27 14:37:38+00:00): There is a parking lot here.
closed by iandees (2013-05-28 13:55:54+00:00): Added parking lot.
opened by  (2013-05-27 14:44:52+00:00): This intersection needs cleanup. There are two small pedestrian islands here not the long split before the turn onto G. W. Way.
opened by  (2013-05-27 14:52:10+00:00): East end of Court St. here. The mapped segment currently extends onto the Easterday Farms Produce Company property.
closed by noliver (2013-05-27 17:21:19+00:00): This has been corrected.
opened by  (2013-05-27 14:52:45+00:00): Traffic light here.
opened by  (2013-05-27 14:53:43+00:00): Traffic light here.
opened by  (2013-05-27 14:54:08+00:00): Traffic light here.
opened by  (2013-05-27 14:54:40+00:00): Traffic light here.
opened by  (2013-05-27 14:55:08+00:00): Traffic light here.
opened by  (2013-05-27 14:55:59+00:00): Traffic light here.
opened by  (2013-05-27 14:56:22+00:00): Traffic light here.
opened by  (2013-05-27 14:56:55+00:00): Traffic light here.
opened by  (2013-05-27 14:57:27+00:00): Traffic light here.
opened by  (2013-05-27 14:57:55+00:00): Traffic light here.
opened by  (2013-05-27 14:58:39+00:00): Traffic light here.
opened by  (2013-05-27 15:00:04+00:00): Traffic light here.
opened by  (2013-05-27 15:18:45+00:00): Ambiguous name. Should be "City of Pasco: Transportation Depot". Both Amtrak and Greyhound use this station.
opened by  (2013-05-27 15:19:39+00:00): Traffic light here.
opened by  (2013-05-27 15:22:35+00:00): Traffic light here. Note that west bound traffic goes along Sylvester St. not Yakima St.
opened by cronoser (2013-05-27 15:55:15+00:00): Aquí hay una rotonda
commented by cronoser (2014-01-21 01:44:31+00:00): indicada, falta ortofoto para comprobar precisión
closed by cronoser (2015-01-20 14:28:00+00:00): corregido gracias a las nuevas ortofotos
opened by  (2013-05-27 15:56:41+00:00): Alviso is a district of the City of San Jose, not a town. It hasn't been an independent city for decades.
closed by andrewpmk (2013-05-28 15:35:33+00:00): Changed to place=suburb
opened by cronoser (2013-05-27 15:57:35+00:00): Aquí hay una rotonda y una calle que van hacia las naves industriales
closed by cronoser (2013-11-30 14:21:19+00:00): indicada
opened by cronoser (2013-05-27 15:58:55+00:00): Rotonda de forma provisional, indicarla acorde a Ortofotos
closed by cronoser (2013-08-15 15:39:37+00:00): esta bien trazada
opened by cronoser (2013-05-27 15:59:54+00:00): Estatua, ¿Nombre?
closed by cronoser (2013-11-30 22:20:04+00:00): estaba indicada
opened by  (2013-05-27 16:00:03+00:00): Palo Alto node is missing population
closed by andrewpmk (2013-05-28 15:34:51+00:00): added
opened by  (2013-05-27 16:10:48+00:00): bounds: (41.2089,-73.9906 - 41.2016,-73.9698)
Brownsell is located only on the west side of Route 9W (South Liberty Drive) where it is shown. Zarriello Lane continues all  the way to the end (where Brownsell is shown) near my listing.
closed by Aaron Lidman (2013-06-06 06:25:14+00:00): Fixed, thanks.
opened by trinidadcars (2013-05-27 16:13:52+00:00): Test
opened by  (2013-05-27 16:29:37+00:00): Buckinghamshire New University
High Wycombe Campus, Queen Alexandra Rd, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire HP11 2JZ ‎
01494 522141
closed by alux (2013-06-12 21:26:47+00:00): Thanks, address and phone number added.
opened by  (2013-05-27 16:46:46+00:00): kk
commented by  (2013-05-27 16:46:55+00:00): kkoo
closed by pitscheplatsch (2013-05-27 20:27:36+00:00): Unhelpful comment
opened by  (2013-05-27 16:47:29+00:00): Salle Jean Gabin
opened by  (2013-05-27 16:47:30+00:00): House number 4
closed by Morrolan (2013-06-14 14:23:21+00:00): Ambiguous comment - closed.
opened by  (2013-05-27 16:48:05+00:00): bounds: (49.1211,-122.8349 - 49.1084,-122.7933)
Map is missing data here. 61 Ave is a cul de sac street on the east side of 148 street
closed by Aaron Lidman (2013-07-11 17:27:42+00:00): Seems plausible.
opened by  (2013-05-27 16:48:23+00:00): Restaurant Lou pichoun
opened by  (2013-05-27 16:48:54+00:00): Restaurant le Vieux Four
opened by  (2013-05-27 16:50:01+00:00): Piscine d' été
opened by  (2013-05-27 16:50:44+00:00): La Poste
opened by TomH (2013-05-27 16:58:37+00:00): This should really be a cycle path as it is part of NCN61.
commented by TomH (2013-05-27 16:59:27+00:00): It is already tagged bicycle=permissive though
opened by jacky06 (2013-05-27 16:58:59+00:00): Stade de football et terrains de tennis
opened by  (2013-05-27 17:16:59+00:00): La Tahona Holandesa

Dutch and International restaurant
commented by  (2013-07-01 08:33:19+00:00): added to osm
closed by Lübeck (2013-07-01 08:34:01+00:00): added to osm
opened by malenki (2013-05-27 17:35:03+00:00): Kopiert vom unsinnig geschlossenen OSB http://soomohgh.notlong.com :  

Diese Straße heißt "Olbernhauer Straße". [Dr. Paßlack, 2013-05-27 08:36:13 CEST]
closed by malenki (2013-05-29 19:07:52+00:00): am 27. von Thomas 8122 behoben
opened by LordOfMaps (2013-05-27 18:04:54+00:00): Neubauten fehlen.
commented by Noframe (2013-05-28 14:37:54+00:00): Bisher keine im LB erkennbar
commented by  (2013-07-08 20:53:21+00:00): sind aber da
commented by  (2013-07-12 17:26:42+00:00): in der karte ist bislang nur ein neubau
closed by erge50 (2014-06-04 04:25:38+00:00): Es geht ja auch langsam weiter!
opened by  (2013-05-27 18:11:52+00:00): meine Pension liegt genau da,wo die Markierung ist ! Sultan Pension  Kale ici  mektep sok.no:3
Antalya
closed by yolcu (2013-07-16 20:30:55+00:00): Fixed
opened by  (2013-05-27 18:44:55+00:00): Zwischen diesem Punkt in Richtung Osten bis zur Hochstraße heißt diese Straße nicht Luther Weg sondern Hannoversche Straße.
Gruß!
opened by  (2013-05-27 18:49:11+00:00): bounds: (46.1931,-123.8476 - 46.1864,-123.8268)
Map is missing data here. no map is showing
closed by ToeBee (2013-05-28 02:36:45+00:00): Seems to be a Craigslist map display issue
opened by  (2013-05-27 19:16:59+00:00): пар
commented by  (2013-05-27 19:17:03+00:00): прарапрпа
closed by pitscheplatsch (2013-05-27 20:29:12+00:00): Unhelpful comment
opened by  (2013-05-27 19:46:57+00:00): One way
commented by mackerski (2013-05-31 11:33:54+00:00): OK - but which direction?
closed by ika-chan! UK-USA (2014-05-14 18:33:33+00:00): No evidence of one way found.
opened by Jan Westerhof (2013-05-27 19:59:47+00:00): Autoweg-situatie is hier veranderd, is al gedeeltelijk open, maar ligt nog niet helemaal goed  (het fietspad is wel met GPS ingetekend).
closed by Jan Westerhof (2013-07-16 16:19:39+00:00): Ik heb de Diemerpolderweg verlegd.
opened by  (2013-05-27 20:00:34+00:00): Entrée du parking (mono directionnel donc)
closed by gorn (2013-05-27 20:39:43+00:00): mapped
opened by parville (2013-05-27 20:01:55+00:00): entrée du parking (l'entrée ne se fait que quand on vient du rond point (tourne à gauche interdit dans l'autre sens).
commented by gorn (2013-05-27 20:41:59+00:00): it means that this road is unidirectional from east to west?
commented by parville (2013-05-27 20:50:59+00:00): No. need to add an entry to carpark. The entry takes from "Bd Gambetta" and go in the park.
commented by gorn (2013-05-27 21:12:37+00:00): I have added it few meters to the left, where it is probably located according to the satelite image. Is it correct?
commented by parville (2013-05-27 21:18:05+00:00): No. entry takes in from the yellow street . This is a very short and hard ramp ! 

The private path is for the EMS vehicles which leaves direct on the roundabout above my note.
commented by gorn (2013-05-27 21:21:18+00:00): ok, I think i understand. I have added the road and the turn restriction. i think it is correct now. Please confirm
closed by parville (2013-05-27 21:22:51+00:00): Yes. Perfect !
opened by parville (2013-05-27 20:02:11+00:00): sortie du parking
closed by gorn (2013-05-27 20:50:17+00:00): mapped
opened by parville (2013-05-27 20:04:05+00:00): la cours d'honneur est accessible en voiture  depuis la voie des capucins; il n'est pas possible de passer vers la cours Germont (ni l'inverse) 

Attention la cours d'honneur se parcourt par la gauche et non la droite (mono sens)
commented by gorn (2013-05-27 20:55:11+00:00): It would be really helpful if you try to edit the map yourself. This is very difficult to understand what exactly do you mean (although I understand french)
commented by parville (2013-05-27 21:26:57+00:00): There is a link between the two arcs at left and right of the notepoint !  (covered passage). Then arriving in the 'cour', you must turn to left (like in UK !) and not right (like in France !).  Car coming in can only turn by left around the green area. It is impossible to turn left at the opposite of the current note. (closed to cars)
closed by gorn (2013-05-27 21:48:29+00:00): i tried to map it.
opened by parville (2013-05-27 20:04:28+00:00): accès piéton "Rue de germont"
closed by gorn (2013-05-27 20:31:58+00:00): mapped
opened by parville (2013-05-27 20:05:09+00:00): TEOR
closed by gorn (2013-05-27 20:46:38+00:00): yes this is marked as bus
opened by parville (2013-05-27 20:05:31+00:00): TEOR
closed by gorn (2013-05-27 20:46:48+00:00): yes this is marked as bus
opened by parville (2013-05-27 20:07:15+00:00): C'est la place saint vivien et non la rue armand carrel 

http://goo.gl/maps/eUE8g
closed by gorn (2013-05-27 21:08:24+00:00): I have made the change, but please understand that we can not use information from licenced sources, like google maps. I hope that you know the place and the link is only supportive argument.
opened by parville (2013-05-27 20:09:25+00:00): cet immeuble est desservi par une voie qui se raccorde à l'entrée du groupe d'immeubles figurés un peu plus à l'Est (desserte parrallèle  à l'immeuble qui longe la rue Brisout )
closed by gorn (2013-05-27 21:31:03+00:00): mapped
opened by  (2013-05-27 20:10:15+00:00): parque empresarial Celta