piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
closed by Amche (2013-08-15 21:22:02+00:00): Novo renoviran i moderan hostel smješten je u starom dijelu Sarajeva između naselja Bistrik i Alfakovac, samo nekoliko minuta hoda od gradske Vijećnice i Baščaršije, odakle se do najvažnijih turističkih atrakcija može doći pješice.

Sobe su namIjenjene za mlade, parove  i porodice koje žele da provedu nezaboravne trenutke u Sarajevu.
opened by Internetuser (2013-08-15 21:33:21+00:00): Laut http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparking

sollen "generell nur öffentliche Parkplätze eingetragen" werden?!
commented by  (2013-08-16 08:26:09+00:00): Moin, da hat jemand seine private Meinung in die wiki geschrieben. Auf der englischen wiki Seite ist von dem nichts zu lesen undes ginge auch an der Mappingwirklichkeit vorbei. Zugangsbeschränkungen werden über die access Tags angegeben.
closed by Internetuser (2013-08-17 02:29:02+00:00): Danke.
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:18+00:00): max speed 50
closed by steak country (2013-08-19 09:31:48+00:00): We cannot use your maxspeed comments if you don't clarify them by giving the direction in which they apply. For example for this one, we need to know if the 50km/h limit is for the part of the road that is on the East or on the West of your marker. Thanks
commented by  (2015-10-07 12:50:34+00:00): Heeft geen functie
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:19+00:00): max speed 50
closed by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 06:30:27+00:00): ingevoerd alsof bedoeld aan beide zijden rond punt max 50 op provinciale weg
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:26+00:00): max speed 80
closed by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 06:34:00+00:00): ingevoerd van hier tot Schoondijke
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 06:35:59+00:00): verandering geannuleerd, omdat inderdaad niet duidelijk genoeg is (zoals  steak country aangaf ) van waar tot waar de opmerking geldig is...
closed by EtienneM (2014-04-14 18:15:25+00:00): De maximumsnelheid geldt op dit weggedeelte tot en met de (nieuwe) rotonde ten noorden van Schoondijke
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:27+00:00): max speed 60
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:27+00:00): new round about
commented by captain007 (2013-09-01 17:27:01+00:00): is this roundabout already opened to traffic?
closed by captain007 (2013-09-23 09:43:58+00:00): Added new roundabout.
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:27+00:00): max speed 80
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 06:36:16+00:00): in what direction? until where?
closed by captain007 (2013-09-23 10:07:55+00:00): I will close this, because this road may be degraded in short future after opening of new bypass Schoondijke
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:27+00:00): max 60
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 06:36:41+00:00): in what direction? until where?
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 06:36:48+00:00): in what direction? until where?
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:28+00:00): max speed 60
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:28+00:00): max 80
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 06:37:01+00:00): in what direction? until where?
commented by  (2014-01-24 22:01:28+00:00): Komsestraat is 60 from begin till end in both directions.
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 06:37:06+00:00): in what direction? until where?
commented by  (2014-01-24 22:02:38+00:00): Nolleweg is 60 from begin till end in both directions.
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:29+00:00): max speed 80
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 06:37:12+00:00): in what direction? until where?
commented by  (2014-01-24 22:30:07+00:00): Max speed 80 from Biervliet in direction Ijzendijke approx 100/150 meters after the crossing with Hoofdplaatseweg all the way to the point where the lanes split at the crossing Tivoli/Watervlietsewege. max speed 70 from the split until the crossing with trafficlights for traffic in direction Ijzendijke. Max speed traffic other direction 80 until a 100/150 meter before crossing Hoofdplaatseweg.
closed by captain007 (2015-01-12 18:43:03+00:00): Deze maar sluiten want hier is alles veranderd.
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:29+00:00): max speed 60
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 06:37:18+00:00): in what direction? until where?
closed by captain007 (2015-01-12 18:42:58+00:00): Deze maar sluiten want hier is alles veranderd.
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:29+00:00): end 60 max speed 80
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 06:37:25+00:00): in what direction? until where?
commented by  (2014-01-24 22:15:19+00:00): Direction Hoek. 80 until crossing hoekseweg/mauritsfort. To be more exact, 80 stops where the lanes split. From there 70 until the crossing with trafficlights.
In other direction from crossing  hoekseweg until this point max speed 80.
commented by  (2014-01-24 22:21:12+00:00): From this point in the direction of Ijzendijke the max speed is 60. Approx a 100/150 meters after the crossing with Hoofdplaatseweg the max speed goes up to 80.
closed by captain007 (2015-01-12 18:42:43+00:00): Deze maar sluiten, want alles moet hier opnieuw ingetekend worden.
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 06:37:33+00:00): in what direction? until where?
commented by  (2014-01-24 22:32:01+00:00): Driesprongweg is 60 from begin till end in both directions.
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 06:41:20+00:00): op de Braakmanweg? tot waar?
commented by  (2014-01-24 22:36:08+00:00): Starts at crossing N61 until the end. both directions.
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:30+00:00): max speed 60
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-27 12:31:23+00:00): more info needed
commented by  (2014-01-24 22:38:03+00:00): Kreekweg is 60 from begin till end in both directions.
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:30+00:00): amax speed 60
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-27 12:31:18+00:00): more info needed
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-27 12:31:14+00:00): more info needed
commented by  (2014-01-24 22:40:09+00:00): Hasjesstraat is 60 from begin till end in both directions. From Zandplaatweg to Noordijk.
closed by wvdp (2014-02-03 10:52:23+00:00): dank u wel voor het toevoegen aan osm
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:30+00:00): max speed 100
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-27 12:31:08+00:00): more info needed
commented by captain007 (2013-09-01 17:32:29+00:00): Is 100 from crossing with N682 and N62
closed by captain007 (2013-12-07 11:03:57+00:00): Closed this, because everything changes here after the reconstruction.
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:31+00:00): new round aubout
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-27 12:30:38+00:00): what is lacking to correct the current situation?
closed by captain007 (2013-09-01 17:31:44+00:00): This is correct to the situation I drawed it on the map, so can be closed.
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:31+00:00): new round about
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-27 12:30:42+00:00): what is lacking to correct the current situation?
closed by captain007 (2013-09-01 17:31:54+00:00): Is already correct on map.
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:31+00:00): max speed 100
closed by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 07:17:25+00:00): corrected, using local knowledge as well as note
closed by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 07:17:16+00:00): corrected, using local knowledge as well as note
closed by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 07:17:05+00:00): corrected, using local knowledge as well as note
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:32+00:00): max speed 100
closed by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 07:16:34+00:00): corrected, using local knowledge as well as note
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:32+00:00): max speed 70
commented by joost schouppe (2013-08-22 07:17:47+00:00): not sure how to interpret
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:32+00:00): max speed 60
commented by  (2014-01-24 21:26:55+00:00): It's an advised speed of 60 km/h. Not a maximum speed.
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:33+00:00): max speed 100
closed by Sander H (2013-08-16 21:10:31+00:00): done
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:33+00:00): max speed 70
closed by Sander H (2013-08-16 21:10:15+00:00): I remember it's 100 here
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:33+00:00): max speed 80
closed by Sander H (2013-08-16 21:09:27+00:00): done
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:33+00:00): max speed 30
closed by Sander H (2013-08-16 21:09:15+00:00): done
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:34+00:00): max speed 80
closed by Sander H (2013-08-16 21:09:12+00:00): done
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:34+00:00): max speed 60
closed by Sander H (2013-08-16 21:39:31+00:00): done
closed by Sander H (2013-08-16 21:09:01+00:00): done
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:34+00:00): max speed 100
closed by Sander H (2013-08-16 21:08:54+00:00): done
closed by Sander H (2013-08-16 21:08:48+00:00): done
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:35+00:00): max speed 50
closed by Sander H (2013-08-16 21:08:20+00:00): was already 50 (direction north)
closed by Sander H (2013-08-16 21:08:06+00:00): was already 50 (direction south)
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:35+00:00): max speed 80
closed by Sander H (2013-08-16 21:07:46+00:00): was already 80 (direction north)
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:35+00:00): 60
closed by micjon (2013-12-10 17:57:56+00:00): Notes zijn bedoeld voor kaartfouten.
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:36:36+00:00): max speed 50
opened by  (2013-08-15 21:42:59+00:00): ...
opened by robbieonsea (2013-08-15 21:57:03+00:00): The footpath here has a Traffic Order to move the last 200 metres of it slightly to the East and thus no longer through the Farm.
Resurvey it, if the order is approved and the path is routed.
closed by Andy Street (2013-10-24 18:43:42+00:00): Fixed
opened by  (2013-08-15 22:03:44+00:00): .
closed by hothunter (2013-10-01 18:33:16+00:00): ???
opened by Joker234 (2013-08-15 22:07:19+00:00): Hausnummern fehlen
commented by xeen (2013-08-25 20:08:59+00:00): nicht hilfreicher kommentar
opened by Joker234 (2013-08-15 22:08:39+00:00): trans fair eintragen
opened by Joker234 (2013-08-15 22:09:33+00:00): Parkhaus mittlerweile fertig
opened by Joker234 (2013-08-15 22:10:41+00:00): Straßen auf Baufläche existieren nicht mehr
opened by bstegmaier (2013-08-15 22:10:43+00:00): limitare del bosco approssimativo
commented by CCCGGG (2022-09-16 05:33:08+00:00): Dagli sfondi satellitari pare corrispondere. La nota però è molto vecchia e forse si riferisce a una situazione ormai già aggiornata?
closed by bstegmaier (2022-09-16 05:53:28+00:00): Non mi ricordo cosa intendessi con questo. Lo chiuso.
opened by Joker234 (2013-08-15 22:11:46+00:00): Bahnstadt generell veraltet
opened by miprimerdrop (2013-08-15 22:13:33+00:00): Palacio de La Moneda
closed by Chilestreet (2014-03-01 17:18:52+00:00): el palacio de la moneda no se encuentra en esta ubicación. y ya esta en el mapa.
Notal Falsa.
opened by Jan Westerhof (2013-08-15 22:15:07+00:00): Dit restaurant zit hier slechts 2 maanden. Op 1 oktober verhuist het weer naar Asterweg 14.
closed by Jan Westerhof (2013-10-02 15:18:48+00:00): Weer terug naar Asterweg verplaatst
opened by  (2013-08-15 22:18:33+00:00): Интернациональная 77
opened by mcheck (2013-08-15 22:25:36+00:00): Please check way here, very bad...

Thanks
closed by mcheck (2013-09-05 09:38:57+00:00): i've tried to solve
opened by  (2013-08-15 22:37:10+00:00): Salida de Caminata
closed by muralito (2013-08-17 23:28:41+00:00): Y?
Las "Map Notes" no son para cosas personales.
opened by  (2013-08-15 22:38:29+00:00): church might not be here anymore
closed by russdeffner (2013-08-17 19:01:14+00:00): Thanks for the note, but please only provide concrete data; may or may not does not help us improve the map - if you visit the area and verify it is no longer there then let us know.  Until then, there is nothing to do with this note.
commented by oba510 (2013-08-17 22:40:50+00:00): reactivated valid note; it looks like there are houses/apartments here in the aerial, not a church, but it needs to be checked by someone
commented by dchiles (2013-09-02 23:26:05+00:00): Correct no longer a church but apartemtn building
opened by  (2013-08-15 22:47:04+00:00): bounds: (33.0194,-96.6826 - 33.0113,-96.6618)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?box=yes&notes=yes&bbox=-96.6826%2C33.0113%2C-96.6618%2C33.0194
Map is showing wrong data here. pin is not in the right place
closed by ToeBee (2013-10-11 03:50:32+00:00): Craigslist website problem
opened by  (2013-08-15 22:47:54+00:00): soacha
closed by harrierco (2013-11-16 13:58:49+00:00): ya esta
opened by Gerhardus Geldenhuis (2013-08-15 22:48:49+00:00): Road classification in this area needs further clarification.
closed by confusedbuffalo (2018-12-21 00:43:31+00:00): Appears to have since been sorted
opened by  (2013-08-15 22:49:33+00:00): bab alzeton
commented by NeisBot (2024-01-14 12:47:12+00:00): Thank you for your note. It appears to be quite old, dating back more than 10 years. We value all contributions, and to ensure the map is up-to-date, we kindly ask for your input. 

If there are still relevant details or updates regarding this note? Thank you! 

#OldNote
opened by  (2013-08-15 23:01:49+00:00): Exit 0
opened by  (2013-08-15 23:03:24+00:00): SIE7E·SEC
closed by cronoser (2013-11-28 23:39:53+00:00): corregido
opened by  (2013-08-15 23:11:07+00:00): Meet me here
opened by  (2013-08-15 23:14:11+00:00): Etiqcica,
opened by dommage (2013-08-15 23:25:54+00:00): lt. Schild gehört das dem Landkreis Freiberg, was ja nun Mittelsachsen ist.  genau steht da:  Landratsamt Freiberg  Leitstelle Feuerwehr / Rettungsdienst  09599 Freiberg  .  so steht es am Schild, macht was draus ;-)
closed by Rps333 (2013-08-17 13:34:52+00:00): according to the sign belongs to the district of Freiberg, Saxony, which now means yes. just stands there: District Office Freiberg control center Fire / Rescue Services 09599 Freiberg. it is the sign that makes something out of it;-)rong 


Wrong area
opened by Guhot (2013-08-15 23:28:13+00:00): Hier ist eine asphaltierte Strasse
commented by  (2013-08-20 02:28:53+00:00): habe den Teil mal als Strasse eingetragen, weiter suedlich ist nicht klar ob es auch richtige Strasse ist oder ehr trackgrade 1. Kannst du das nochmals pruefen wo ueberall der Track falsch ist?
commented by  (2014-02-20 15:32:51+00:00): 19.02.14
Habe mir heute mal die angesprochenen Stellen angesehen.
Der obere Teil (Von der Firma Roth & Rau aus beschrieben!) der Straße „IM VIERTEL“ ist zwar asphaltiert, aber der Zustand ist desolat.
Es scheint kein vernünftiger Untergrund  vorhanden zu sein.
Je weiter man den Berg hinunter kommt ist nur noch ein unbefestigter Weg vorhanden. Der jetzige Zustand der Karte ist meiner Meinung nach richtig beschrieben.
Die Nummerierung der Häuser geht laut den an den  Straßennamensschildern angebrachten Hinweistafeln folgendermaßen.
Das Eckgrundstück oben trägt die Nr. 12.
Die Häuser an dem kleinen Weg Richtung Osten werden mit den Nummern 5-10 angezeigt (nach der 12 in der Ecke müsste also die 10 folgen was ich aber nicht überprüft habe).
Richtung Südosten, den Berg hinab beginnt das erste Haus mit der Nr. 13;
Es folgt die 14 ;15 + 16. Danach die 17, 17b, 17a  die 18 und die 18b ist das letzte Haus am Grund vor dem Bach.
Das sind die Nummer welche ich vom Weg aus erkannte. Da aber einige Häuser zurückversetzt stehen konnte ich die genaue Zuordnung nicht überprüfen. Zwischen der Nr. 18 und der 18b verläuft eine kleine Zufahrt.
Falls die Hausnummern eingetragen werden sollten würde ich analog den an den Straßennamensschildern angebrachten Hinweisen verfahren.
Also oben Nr. 5 – Nr. 10;.  Und dann die Nummern 12 bis 18b   für den Weg ins Tal.
commented by Klumbumbus (2014-04-11 22:27:28+00:00): Danke für die Beschreibung. Straßen werden nicht nach Zustand, sondern nach vorangigem Nutzungszweck klassifiziert. Hier ist es eine Straße zu einem Wohngebiet. Zustand und Oberfläche werden mit anderen Eigenschaften beschrieben (habe ich auch eingetragen gemäß deiner Beschreibung). ---- Kannst du für die Hausnummern nochmal jeweils einzelne Marker setzen? Das ist so leider nicht so richtig nachvollziehbar.
commented by  (2014-04-23 10:23:32+00:00): Bin heute nochmal die Strecke „IM VIERTEL“ abgelaufen.
Die Nummerierung der Häuser habe ich den einzelnen Häusern zugeordnet!
Bezüglich des Straßenzustandes und der Zuständigkeit habe ich mit einem Anwohner gesprochen.
Es handelt sich um einen Privatweg. Er wurde von den Anwohnern je nach Möglichkeit in den jetzigen Zustand versetzt. Die Zufahrt, selbst für Feuerwehr oder Rettungsdienste ist nicht überall oder nur eingeschränkt möglich.
Ihr solltet über die Eintragung als >Straße/Weg< nochmal entscheiden.
commented by Klumbumbus (2014-04-23 14:54:46+00:00): Danke für die Einzelzuordnung der Hausnummern. Hausnummern sind sehr wichtig für OSM, da z.B. Navis auf Basis von OSM-Daten erst dann Hausnummerngenau routen können.
commented by Klumbumbus (2014-04-23 15:07:51+00:00): Ich habe den Wegen noch ein access=permissive hinzugefügt. Das bedeutet soviel wie: Privatweg, die Nutzung wird in der Regel gestattet ("Privatweg, Benutzung auf eigene Gefahr") Ich denke, das passt hier so ungefähr laut deiner Beschreibung. Weitere Infos zu Zugangsberechtigungen: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

So wie ich die Sache sehe, ist der Hauptzweck dieser Straße, dass die Anwohner oder deren Besucher zu ihren Häusern kommen. Daher ist die Klassifizierung schon so richtig. (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway). Es gibt noch sehr viel mehr Kartenstile als diesen Standard-Stil. Kleine Übersicht: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:List_of_OSM_based_Services 
Sicher ist auch einer dabei, der Oberflächen von Wegen anzeigt, sofern sie denn eingetragen sind.
commented by  (2014-04-23 15:26:31+00:00): Hallo, 
nochmal zum Im Viertel.
Das Im Viertel beginnt im Mineralbad mit der Hausnummer 1 und das in Richtung Norden danebenliegende Einfamilienhaus hat die Nr. 1a weiter geht es in westl. Richtung etwas zurückgesetzt mit der 1c und 1d weiter in Richtung westen liegt 1g und 1i.
Im Viertel 3,4 und 4a liegen unmittelbar am alten Sachsenring S245.
Die weitern Hausnummern an der Stichstraße von der beschriebenen asphaltierten Straße Richtung Osten beginnend mit 5,6,7 und 7a, weiter 9 und 10.
Die Gebäude 8 und 11 wurden im Zuge des Gewerbeneubaues abgerissen.
Weiter geht es wie beschrieben mit 12 in Richtung zum Tal bis an den beschriebenen Bach.
Die Hausnummer 19 liegt wieder weiter westlich und ist nur von der B180 aus zu erreichen. Einfahrt etwa in Höhe gegenüber Weg Am Sachsenring.
commented by Klumbumbus (2014-04-23 15:44:14+00:00): Bitte wieder Einzelmarker mit den Nummern setzen. Man kann das so in Textform wirklich nicht nachvollziehen.
closed by Klumbumbus (2014-05-04 22:11:30+00:00): Sollte soweit erstmal erledigt sein.
opened by  (2013-08-15 23:35:39+00:00): Pestbildstock
closed by tyr_asd (2013-08-16 15:29:46+00:00): Eingetragen. Danke!
opened by  (2013-08-15 23:36:48+00:00): Fernheizwerk
closed by tyr_asd (2013-08-16 15:35:05+00:00): Eingetragen. Danke!
opened by MCPicoli (2013-08-15 23:42:26+00:00): As of 2013-08-15 this way is closed because the bridge is condemned after years of neglect.
commented by MCPicoli (2013-08-15 23:43:37+00:00): OSM data was changed to reflect this.
closed by vgeorge (2013-08-16 05:35:42+00:00): Então está resolvido?
opened by  (2013-08-15 23:45:22+00:00): School
commented by  (2013-08-17 03:53:28+00:00): there is a catholic school nearby already. is there one here and if so, what is the name?
opened by  (2013-08-15 23:46:19+00:00): TINTORERÍA SIE7E·SEC
closed by cronoser (2013-11-28 23:39:46+00:00): corregido
opened by  (2013-08-16 00:31:30+00:00): Parking for Ceremony available in the PriceRite Parking lot 250 Elmwood Ave Buffalo NY 14201
opened by Nino Galante (2013-08-16 00:32:22+00:00): 38.17 lat. nord - 14.924 long. est
Terremoto magnitudo 4.2
16/08/2013 ore 01:06:51 (italiana - UTC+2)
opened by andrewpmk (2013-08-16 00:41:39+00:00): more parking aisles
closed by Umbugbene (2013-08-21 22:23:54+00:00): done
opened by progserega (2013-08-16 00:46:00+00:00): комплекс по переработке ТБО
closed by progserega (2013-10-06 04:57:27+00:00): поправил
opened by progserega (2013-08-16 00:46:01+00:00): подворье "о. Русский"
opened by 2E2D 2e2d (2013-08-16 00:58:00+00:00): CEE-Fès:centre d'éducation à l'environnement créer dans le cadre du projet 2E2D eau &éducation au développement durable drojet réaliser par l'AESVT-Fes et financé par la DDC-suisse
opened by  (2013-08-16 00:59:06+00:00): La ultima cuadra de Bilbao este mano unica hacia Paso del Rey
closed by AgusQui (2013-08-27 04:06:03+00:00): Corregido pero sin verificar
opened by  (2013-08-16 00:59:12+00:00): New Bay Bridge opens September 3, 2013.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-15/san-francisco-bay-span-to-open-sept-3-agency-decides.html
opened by  (2013-08-16 01:06:21+00:00): DriveTest Oshawa is roughly at centre of this building, examination parking at South side
commented by  (2013-08-16 01:06:56+00:00): I meant DriveTest Port Union, not Oshawa
opened by  (2013-08-16 01:11:09+00:00): DriveTest Oshawa is somewhere at this plaza, likely at same space as Ministry of Transportation office
opened by  (2013-08-16 01:15:29+00:00): La ultima cuadra de Bilbao este mano unica hacia Paso del Rey
closed by AgusQui (2013-08-19 17:24:20+00:00): Corregido pero sin verificar
opened by  (2013-08-16 01:21:06+00:00): name="Bayview Secondary School" addr=10077 Bayview Ave. website=www.bayview.ss.yrdsb.edu.on.ca
opened by  (2013-08-16 01:26:55+00:00): Mother Teresa Catholic Public School addr="7100 Birchmount Road" website=http://mta.ycdsb.ca/
opened by  (2013-08-16 01:27:42+00:00): Campus police services, and Parking services
opened by  (2013-08-16 01:29:01+00:00): عمان
opened by  (2013-08-16 01:29:42+00:00): Road is closed at this point. Gate never opens.
opened by  (2013-08-16 01:41:36+00:00): bounds: (41.8756,-88.0265 - 41.8685,-88.0056)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?box=yes&notes=yes&bbox=-88.0265%2C41.8685%2C-88.0056%2C41.8756
Map is showing wrong data here. I am near roosevelt rd. and westmore
closed by iandees (2013-09-11 16:54:38+00:00): Sounds like a bad geocode from craigslist.
opened by  (2013-08-16 01:54:42+00:00): bab al ain
closed by JvR (2013-09-06 20:48:52+00:00): no here, but in the city
opened by  (2013-08-16 01:56:02+00:00): Commerce St speed bump at crosswalk near AMC theatre and suggested curve speed=30; maxspeeds at Commerce St, Interchange Way, Peelar Rd, Exchange Way (street signs indicate it as Exchange Avenue), Edgeley Blvd =50; maxspeed for Vaughan Mills ring roads and connector roads out to mall boundary=40
opened by emacsen (2013-08-16 01:59:17+00:00): Is this road "Buck Valley Drive" or "Buckvalley Drive"- TIGER has both.
closed by freebeer (2020-04-15 06:21:56+00:00): has been unified as buck valley, including street parts previously named completely different
opened by emacsen (2013-08-16 02:00:07+00:00): Is this road "Mike Road" or "Mikes Road"- TIGER has both.
closed by freebeer (2020-04-15 06:24:37+00:00): has been unified by telenav as mikes
opened by skorasaurus (2013-08-16 02:01:38+00:00): these need to be made into dual carriageways, that is 2 separate, one way roads.
opened by emacsen (2013-08-16 02:03:18+00:00): Is this road Long Woods Drive or Long Woods Road?
closed by Unglued13 (2017-01-25 21:30:21+00:00): It's considered part of warner I believe
opened by  (2013-08-16 02:05:37+00:00): bounds: (61.5375,-149.5705 - 61.5352,-149.5601)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?box=yes&notes=yes&bbox=-149.5705%2C61.5352%2C-149.5601%2C61.5375
Map is missing data here. Country Lane does not continue into my neighborhood. It doesn't show Cottonwood, Sprucewood or Meadow.
closed by Baloo Uriza (2015-07-03 16:44:56+00:00): If you could drop notes at each spot where these should be, that would be awesome.
opened by MCPicoli (2013-08-16 02:07:04+00:00): Please note that Bing's aerial imagery is outdated, and the placement of the roads as of now is incorrect. I'll not correct it until I can get a GPS trace of it in the following days.
closed by MCPicoli (2013-09-04 12:29:19+00:00): Trace corrected based on survey data.
opened by  (2013-08-16 02:29:36+00:00): alvernon place apts
closed by russdeffner (2013-08-20 17:12:21+00:00): Since there are 2 notes for alvernon place apts, and this one is in the middle of the street, I'm going to close this one.
opened by  (2013-08-16 02:32:29+00:00): alvernon apts
closed by TheDutchMan13 (2014-02-15 08:43:47+00:00): Thanks, it's been added.
opened by  (2013-08-16 02:51:30+00:00): A commercial business, RASM Australia, is here. Address is Unit 5, 37 Aldenhoven Road, Lonsdale, SA 5160