piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
opened by  (2015-01-22 17:08:34+00:00): bounds: (28.1873,-82.4291 - 28.183,-82.4187)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?box=yes&notes=yes&bbox=-82.4291%2C28.183%2C-82.4187%2C28.1873
Map is missing data here. Map does not show street off of Highland Oaks Blvd and places office address in wrong location;
closed by maxolasersquad (2015-08-14 16:34:54+00:00): The roads here seem to be complete. Would need more information about what is missing.
opened by  (2015-01-22 17:12:59+00:00): parking
closed by JBacc1 (2015-01-22 18:20:11+00:00): Combien de places ?
commented by  (2015-02-03 11:44:37+00:00): 3 Places
commented by  (2015-02-06 12:19:43+00:00): repondez vite
closed by David Crochet (2015-02-15 10:17:25+00:00): ok
opened by stephan75 (2015-01-22 17:13:15+00:00): Buchholz idN:
Die Einmündung der Adolfstraße auf die Kirchenstraße erscheint mir irgendwie versaubeutelt zu sein:

z.B. aus dem Süden kommend von der Kirchenstraße in die Adolfstraße abbiegen scheint laut OSM nur als Geisterfahrer oder im spitzen Winkel zu gehen.

Wenn nicht alles so einfach wäre: Da hängen einige ÖPNV-Relationen dran!
Ich bräuchte für eine Korrektur ohne Schaden an den Relationen viel Muße und Zeit.
closed by stephan75 (2015-02-13 17:12:58+00:00): Habe den Winkel mal korrigiert.
Die ÖPNV-Relationen in Buchholz scheinen ja auch nicht gerade das gelbe vom Ei zu sein ...
opened by  (2015-01-22 17:14:18+00:00): Lake Ridge Rd, not Lakeridge between Rossland and Taunton, from mapillary user rps333 Dec 23, 2014 at Taunton/Lake Ridge Road http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/TN-k8F_NoSwXPznPN54d1w
opened by martinwbaker (2015-01-22 17:15:56+00:00): the added location is Malden and District Society of Model Engineers - also known as Thames Ditton Miniature Railway.

The road from Claygate Lane is called Willowbank - it crosses the railway and continues straight about a quarter of the length of the railway loop.  The westwards extension of the railway extends to within a few feet of Claygate Lane and has a turntable near that end that completely fills the width shown between the stream and the road

A full diagram of the track is at http://malden-dsme.co.uk/public/track.html which are free to copy - I am Treasurer of this organisation and drew that map
closed by Dima_S (2017-02-02 21:43:37+00:00): fix
opened by  (2015-01-22 17:16:11+00:00): Lake Ridge Rd, not Lakeridge between 7th Concession and Ravenshoe, from mapillary user rps333 Dec 23, 2014 at Taunton/Lake Ridge Road http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/TN-k8F_NoSwXPznPN54d1w
opened by fberthold (2015-01-22 17:17:38+00:00): Dieser Abschnitt der Fahrenbacher Straße, zwischen Waldstraße und Erikastraße ist nur für Anlieger und Fahrräder frei befahrbar.
closed by highpotential (2015-02-27 09:21:16+00:00): geändert
opened by  (2015-01-22 17:25:54+00:00): Situatie is reeds veranderd. De overweg is verplaatst, de Van Oldenbarneveltstraat komt eerder bij de Johan de Wittstraat en de Van Heemskerkstraat is afgesloten.
commented by byckel (2015-02-08 20:33:33+00:00): Dank voor de melding. Ik heb de meest opvallende punten vast uit de knoop getrokken. Ik laat de note nog even open staan, want bij het station zijn ze nog niet klaar met bouwen en de oostzijde van de overgang heb ik niet bekeken, daar moet misschien ook nog wel wat gebeuren. Verder hoop ik dat er voor fietsers ook nog wat veranderd gaat worden, want de huidige situatie is 3x niks.
commented by jaap de vries (2016-07-28 15:05:07+00:00): Vanaf vandaag tot maandag 1-8 gaat hier vanalles gebeuren. De tunnels worden eindelijk af gebouwd en het derde perron wordt dan ook in gebruik genomen.
commented by dvdhoven (2016-11-05 19:29:59+00:00): Openingsdatum fiets/voettunnel is vrijdag 11-11-2016
Openingsdatum slingertunnel is 23-12-2016
Overweg gaat op vrijdagmorgen 11-11-2016 definitief dicht en wordt het weekend erna verwijderd.
Het is net het verhaal van de kleine negertjes, toen waren er nog maar 2 (tussen Arnhem en Nijmegen) en die gaan over een paar jaar ook dicht.
http://www.gelderlander.nl/regio/betuwe/overbetuwe/fiets-en-wandeltunnel-elst-vrijdag-open-1.6610833
commented by openMvD (2017-01-02 19:50:27+00:00): Note 760649 gesloten wegens duplicaat-opmerkingen. Deze note is ouder en langer. Klopt trouwens de sporenligging hier nog wel ? Er zijn toch 3 sporen ?
closed by dvdhoven (2017-01-02 21:06:17+00:00): Klopt, van de lijn naar Tiel takt een spoor af, dat aan de kant van de Heinz loopt en als kopspoor eindigt. Maakte deel uit van het onzalige plan de trein van/naar Tiel in Elst te laten beginnen en eindigen.
opened by Boqn (2015-01-22 17:36:15+00:00): Reported and assumed correct speed limit is 90 km/h.
Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
Created by www.appello.com
closed by Veso (2015-01-31 21:13:29+00:00): Really? And that's in your room?
opened by Boqn (2015-01-22 17:36:15+00:00): Няма обратен завой
Reported using Wisepilot map reporter
Created by www.appello.com
opened by  (2015-01-22 17:46:06+00:00): Moveis Brasilia Saul Elkind
opened by  (2015-01-22 17:47:20+00:00): Floristeria FlorArte
closed by jorjega (2015-01-22 17:48:46+00:00): Floristería FlorArte
opened by  (2015-01-22 17:54:27+00:00): Speed 65 min 45
commented by gpserror (2023-03-12 15:52:41+00:00): assuming this is for US34.  Maxspeed is marked already, don't know about minspeed ...
closed by dannmer (2025-12-19 05:11:19+00:00): It's been updated
opened by SomeoneElse (2015-01-22 17:54:38+00:00): Is Bloxholm Lane here really best described as a tertiary here?  My recollection is that it isn't - it's quite narrow, and isn't really on the way to anyway that you wouldn't use the A15 or the B road to get to instead.
closed by ◪ Jarv (2019-10-24 12:34:10+00:00): It is class III, follows road tagging guidelines
commented by SomeoneElse (2019-10-24 13:48:00+00:00): Sorry, what does "it is class III" mean here?
commented by ◪ Jarv (2019-10-24 15:41:53+00:00): Lincolnshire County Council has it as a C class road.
commented by SomeoneElse (2019-10-24 16:06:46+00:00): Thanks - but what's the source of that information (i.e. under what licence have Lincs CC made available that information to OSM)?  In https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtertiary it does suggest that what councils consider as C roads often maps fairly well to tertiary, but this isn't a hard and fast rule - I can think of C roads that on't fit the OSM criteria at all.
commented by ◪ Jarv (2019-10-24 22:10:02+00:00): https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/187711/response/457445/attach/6/C%20Roads%20in%20Lincolnshire.csv.txt?cookie_passthrough=1 is my source of that.
It doesn't contain any information originating from OS, but since its released under FOI from my understanding the information can be used. Potentially with "source:highway = FOI Lincolnshire CC 5642558"???
But having second looks at it, maybe unclass would be better than tertiary
commented by SomeoneElse (2019-11-02 13:24:18+00:00): I don't think that a release under an FOI request will "licence-wash" the data, but I'm far from familiar with such things.  Perhaps it's worth asking on the talk-gb mailing list?  I'm sure it's been discussed there before but can't immediately find the reference.
closed by christophersanders (2026-07-15 01:02:06+00:00): I am being SILENCED by Israel! Listen closely: There is a nuclear power plant being built in Alford
reopened by Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-15 04:58:10+00:00): Reopened by DWG
opened by  (2015-01-22 17:57:43+00:00): Speed 55
closed by Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-02 20:12:39+00:00):   old enough to be sadly no longer useful hint  :(
opened by  (2015-01-22 17:58:26+00:00): Speed 50
closed by Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-02 20:12:37+00:00):   old enough to be sadly no longer useful hint  :(
opened by SomeoneElse (2015-01-22 17:58:45+00:00): There are duplicate "Potterhanworth Heath" here (with slight spelling differences) - http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2663469087 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2653706497 .  I'm guessing in reality there is no such verifiable place, and someone has just copied some text from an OS OpenData_StreetView map.
closed by ⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2026-02-07 14:31:46+00:00): I have relocated the Potterhanworth Heath sign to a central point and removed the old spelling of the sign
opened by  (2015-01-22 17:58:50+00:00): Speed 45
closed by Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-02 20:12:47+00:00):   old enough to be sadly no longer useful hint  :(
opened by  (2015-01-22 17:59:39+00:00): Beim vorbeifahren bin ich der Meinung hier einen REWE-Markt gesehen zu haben. Kann das bitte mal jemand vor Ort nachschauen und eventuell eintragen.
closed by salix01 (2015-04-15 04:59:19+00:00): ergänzt
opened by SomeoneElse (2015-01-22 18:06:23+00:00): "RAF Nocton Hall (disused)" (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2004870658) has been added as a locality here, which makes no sense.  Logically the name belongs as an old_name on an area around the former RAF Nocton Hall, but how far does that extend?

Also, are the buildings here really connected as mapped?  It seems unlikely.  It should be possible to check from the bridleway to the south or the footpath to the east.
closed by SomeoneElse (2025-06-01 22:03:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2004870658 has been deleted
opened by  (2015-01-22 18:09:14+00:00): Speed 65
closed by CurlingMan13 (2023-10-13 20:22:02+00:00): no road here so no way for a speed limit to exist here
opened by  (2015-01-22 18:09:53+00:00): Eine Linie ohne Bedeutung, oder doch?
Zu sehen im Bearbeitungsmodus.
commented by Helmut Kauer (2015-01-22 20:53:09+00:00): Würde sie löschen.
closed by degernfelder (2015-01-23 21:26:57+00:00): Linie entfernt
opened by SomeoneElse (2015-01-22 18:15:33+00:00): The access rights on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322875404/history need checking.  The footpath to the south is a public footpath, as is the one to the north, but this section is allegedly only permissive.  My recollection of this area is that the section where this note is is PF, but although the PF is signed north everyone takes the shortcut (actually the signed PF may not be accessible - or I may be thinking of the access at http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/53.14654/-0.52668&layers=QN).  Anyway - needs a survey.
closed by christophersanders (2026-07-15 01:02:09+00:00): I am being SILENCED by Israel! Listen closely: There is a nuclear power plant being built in Alford
reopened by Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-15 04:58:08+00:00): Reopened by DWG
opened by tabris (2015-01-22 18:21:15+00:00): Hausnummer prüfen. Aktuell anhand der Nachbarschaft geschätzt.
closed by tabris (2015-06-03 19:17:33+00:00): Durch ALKIS bestätigt.
opened by  (2015-01-22 18:26:10+00:00): Hello,
add to map ...
opened by tabris (2015-01-22 18:26:49+00:00): Straßenname prüfen. Aktuell anhand von NRW/ALK und Hausnummern vermutet. Adressen der Häuse 2 und 4 auch ändern, wenn falsch!
closed by tabris (2015-01-31 15:51:03+00:00): Straßenname stimmt so.
opened by mircozorzo (2015-01-22 18:47:37+00:00): Nome via?
opened by SomeoneElse (2015-01-22 18:49:29+00:00): As drawn, the landuse here is misplaced.  The fence to the west of the footpath http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273674141 is the boundary between the farmyard with the buildings in it (to the east) and the farmland (not meadow as I recall) to the west.  Needs redrawing properly.
opened by  (2015-01-22 18:51:02+00:00): This road is called Trustee's Trail. It goes from the Cul-de-sac on the left to the cup-de-sac on the right before the power lines. The cup-de-sac to the right of the power lines is correct (Wilkie Way)
closed by alester (2015-09-02 15:27:14+00:00): The data already matches this description
opened by  (2015-01-22 18:52:10+00:00): Dieser Weg führt auf Privatgrundstück und ist nicht begehbar
opened by  (2015-01-22 18:54:10+00:00): This road is called Spring Gold Way. Juniper Place starts off Rainbow Road and ends at the first big left hand turn. There it turns into Spring Gold Way and stops once it hits Trustee's Trail.
closed by alester (2015-09-02 15:27:07+00:00): The data already matches this description
opened by Baloo Uriza (2015-01-22 18:55:47+00:00): Tiny secondary piece should be primary.
opened by Baloo Uriza (2015-01-22 18:56:25+00:00): Tiny footway connecting into the tertiary should be pedestrian.  This is North Boston Avenue north of Center of the Universe.
opened by Baloo Uriza (2015-01-22 18:56:59+00:00): This is South Boston Avenue.
opened by SomeoneElse (2015-01-22 18:57:40+00:00): It's a while since I walked along here, but I'm sure that there aren't four parallel roads here.  Where there's a traffic island you could argue that there are 2, but that's it.
closed by Dave Venables (2021-12-12 17:02:56+00:00): Looks correct now
opened by  (2015-01-22 19:02:20+00:00): port
closed by Lübeck (2017-11-16 06:33:49+00:00): no port visible in bing
opened by trigpoint (2015-01-22 19:02:39+00:00): Check roundabout
closed by Luiyo (2015-01-23 17:05:26+00:00): corregido
opened by trigpoint (2015-01-22 19:04:55+00:00): Check roundabout exits
closed by Luiyo (2015-01-23 17:08:12+00:00): indicado
opened by dedVorchun (2015-01-22 19:06:58+00:00): 1p
commented by dedVorchun (2015-01-22 19:11:23+00:00): done
opened by dedVorchun (2015-01-22 19:06:58+00:00): 2p
commented by dedVorchun (2015-01-22 19:11:40+00:00): done
opened by dedVorchun (2015-01-22 19:06:58+00:00): 3p
commented by dedVorchun (2015-01-22 19:11:56+00:00): done
opened by  (2015-01-22 19:10:03+00:00): X4
commented by marczoutendijk (2015-01-22 20:16:31+00:00): Wat is de bedoeling?
opened by OpenSourceForEver (2015-01-22 19:10:10+00:00): ¿Seguro que es el consulado de canada? parece ser que el consulado de canadá está en la plaza de catalunya. No soy de Barcelona ¿alguien lo puede comprobar?
closed by tsdgeos (2015-12-18 15:42:38+00:00): Correcto, es la de Albania, lo he arreglado
opened by  (2015-01-22 19:11:09+00:00): X5
commented by marczoutendijk (2015-01-22 20:17:55+00:00): Er was ook al een X4 en een X3, wat wilt u?
opened by  (2015-01-22 19:11:45+00:00): X3
commented by marczoutendijk (2015-01-22 20:17:37+00:00): Ja, wat nu?
opened by hockie (2015-01-22 19:14:43+00:00): An keinem der viele Poller in dieser Wohnsiedlung ist eingetragen mit welchen "Verkehrsmittel" (zu Fuß, mit Fahrrad) man diese passieren darf.
closed by salix01 (2015-03-10 13:48:37+00:00): Auszug aus dem OSM-Wiki:
Einfach die Eigenschaft barrier=bollard an den node heften an dessen Stelle sich der Poller befindet.
Die Eigenschaften access=no foot=yes bicycle=yes werden impliziert.
opened by mircozorzo (2015-01-22 19:16:58+00:00): Nome strada?
closed by kkklllppp (2021-01-07 23:08:43+00:00): Ora ci sono
opened by Lies525 (2015-01-22 19:18:00+00:00): X1=N 52° 04.905 E 006° 01.606
commented by marczoutendijk (2015-01-22 20:19:11+00:00): Moet er iets gebeuren op deze positie?
opened by Lies525 (2015-01-22 19:18:56+00:00): X2=N 52° 04.833 E 006° 01.086
commented by marczoutendijk (2015-01-22 20:24:47+00:00): Zie mijn privebericht over deze opmerkingen.
closed by marczoutendijk (2015-01-23 16:45:40+00:00): Ik heb de berichten vandaag "opgelost"
opened by  (2015-01-22 19:19:17+00:00): Georges Island Lane has a fork not shown here.  There are two distinct rights of way.  One, almost as shown, but making a much sharper left turn at this fork, passes over Nova Scotia PID 60356979 between two lots, PID 60356946 and PID 60356938 (which used to be part of 60356979), passing over at least its eastmost corner, then continuing behind or on PID 60356953 and 60617743, connecting 60356920 and possibly also 60617750 where it seems to end (at 74/73).   This is mentioned in Book 903, Page 555, benefit and burden of a 14' right of way, and cited on survey of 7th day of September, 2011, plan 14991, by Berrigan Surveys Limited, but only the entrance to 60356938, further south than this right of way, is shown.  That is where this roadway currently ends, not at the original 14' wide location between the two lots.

The other right of way, more usually travelled, is on the beach itself.  At the fork the road continues, not shown, bending left only slightly, to enter that beach at the highest tide line.  This road is correctly shown on Nova Scotia Department of Lands and Forests, Surveys Division, Field Plot P-005/88, "CERTAIN LANDS LYING LANDWARD FROM MEAN HIGH WATER MARK Of CRESCENT BEACH", 13th of October 1987.
commented by  (2015-01-22 19:36:07+00:00): https://www.google.ca/maps/@44.2281752,-64.3849794,18z?hl=en
shows, correctly, a fork further north onto Crescent Beach, and also shows the beach fork  correctly.  It shows the sharp left turn leading to 60356938 correctly but then incorrectly shows it continuing straight through, when in fact the 14' right of way is somewhat north.
commented by  (2015-01-23 07:15:02+00:00): Survey plan #11447, Field Plot P-065/93, 26th May 1992, executed January 9 to 12, 1992, also shows the fork into the lot and the beach correctly, at about the right angles, but does not show the entry to Crescent Beach just north of the fork and just south of the main Road.
closed by timdine (2016-03-10 20:55:06+00:00): Updated, confirm correctness.
opened by mircozorzo (2015-01-22 19:21:43+00:00): Mancano i nomi delle via in questa zona
closed by kkklllppp (2015-09-24 13:33:00+00:00): I nomi ci sono ora
closed by mircozorzo (2015-09-24 13:35:38+00:00): Grazie
opened by mircozorzo (2015-01-22 19:25:27+00:00): Nome via?
opened by tabris (2015-01-22 19:25:50+00:00): Prüfen ob hier ein Haus steht. Laut NRW/ALK ja, jedoch ist nichts voreingezeichnet gewesen noch in Bing etwas zu sehen.
closed by tabris (2015-01-31 15:40:50+00:00): Ergebnis vor Ort: Kein Haus
opened by  (2015-01-22 19:29:01+00:00): КПУП "Витебскреклама"
opened by malenki (2015-01-22 19:35:41+00:00): Da der ehemals als Pappelweg eingetragene Weg nun Fichtenweg heißt: wo ist der Pappelweg wirklich?
closed by Duvodas (2015-01-25 13:37:33+00:00): Hallo und danke für Deine Mitarbeit! Schön, dass Du diese bisher so leere Region mit Inhalt füllst. Bitte sei nicht enttäuscht, wenn die Bearbeitung Deiner Informationen etwas länger dauert. Die von Dir genutzte Fehler Funktion wird häufig für kleinere Fehler verwendet und nur selten für das Hinzufügen größerer Datenmengen. Für uns ist es leider etwas aufwendig, diese "Fehler" alle abzuarbeiten. Viel schneller würde es gehen, wenn Du Sie direkt in die Karte einträgst. Du kannst dafür die "Bearbeiten" Funktion auf http://www.openstreetmap.org verwenden, oder es mit einem praktischen Programm machen ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:JOSM/Guide )(etwas komplizierter). Damit Dich Nachrichten wie diese leichter erreichen können, wäre es außerdem praktisch, wenn Du Dich registrierst. Danke schön! :)
commented by malenki (2015-01-25 19:27:18+00:00): Die "Lösung" hat das Thema verfehlt.
Mit ein wenig Nachforschung hättest du auch herausgefunden, dass hier nicht unbedingt meine Heimatregion ist.
commented by Duvodas (2015-01-25 22:42:40+00:00): Sorry, hier hat sich Dein note unter hunderte notes von einem/mehreren Unbekannten geschlichen, so dass er fälschlicherweise auch den copy paste Text verpasst bekommen hat ;)
opened by Ahtojää (2015-01-22 19:44:07+00:00): Pyhäjärvessä piirto-ongelma?
opened by  (2015-01-22 19:44:27+00:00): Die Museumsbahn ist jetzt bis Untere Hauptstraße wieder befahren
commented by Saxonyking (2015-01-30 14:30:00+00:00): Danke
Du meinst bis zum Bahnübergang der Straße "Untere Haupstraße" westlich von diesem Punkt?
commented by  (2015-03-05 18:33:51+00:00): Der Bahnübergang existiert nicht mehr. Die Bahnstrecke wird als Museumsbahn genutzt und kann von Markersdorf Bahnhof bis Bahnhof Schweizerthal-Diethensdorf befahren werden.
closed by Saxonyking (2015-03-11 13:14:34+00:00): Soweit eingetragen
Danke
opened by andrzej_aa (2015-01-22 19:45:35+00:00): name="Kościół w Żulinie", addr:place=Zagrody – coś tutaj jest nie tak
closed by andrzej_aa (2015-01-22 20:32:11+00:00): Mój błąd. Na stronie internetowej parafii jest tak, jak w POI. Wygląda to abstrakcyjnie, ale nie jest błędne.
opened by mircozorzo (2015-01-22 19:51:40+00:00): Ci sono molti sentieri da aggiungere
opened by nuvolabianca (2015-01-22 20:03:30+00:00): Nel centro di Lagagna sono presenti alcune frazioni, ormai fuse fra loro: Resiga, Riale Inferiore, Riale Superiore, Pedelegno, Casa Giacomolo, Alla chiesa (vedi anche http://www.areeprotettevallesesia.it/files/Alagna_frazioni.pdf). Qualcuno che le conosce può inserirle anche solo approssimativamente ? Con un nodo e place = hamlet (o place = neighboard) e name = ...
commented by nuvolabianca (2015-01-22 23:02:52+00:00): ehm, nel centro di ALAGNA ovviamente
closed by popilen (2015-01-23 20:36:36+00:00): Ho inserito il nome delle frazioni
opened by andrzej_aa (2015-01-22 20:03:31+00:00): Jest tutaj jakiś bałagan. Te budynki wskazują na Wirkowice Pierwsze, ale nieopodal jest place Wirkowice Drugie. Same Wirkowice Pierwsze powędrowały pod Starą wieś http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/371977918 Nie mam czasu, aby odnaleźć prawidłowe pozycje dla tych wsi, ale odnalezienie po numerach domów nie powinno być trudne.
closed by maraf24 (2015-04-19 19:28:09+00:00): Poprawiłem, bałagan był z PRNG.
opened by  (2015-01-22 20:05:18+00:00): jkn
opened by VictorIE (2015-01-22 20:11:33+00:00): Abandoned railway marked here (doesn't show on standard view).

This may be confusion (colloquially or in mapping) between a track (footpath) and a railway.
commented by Vincent de Phily (2015-01-23 11:43:51+00:00): Some turns look a bit tight for a train and the old GSGS maps don't show any rails here.

But it could still have been a small private bog-cutting railway. Otherwise, it looks more like a highway=track to me. A survey might solve the incertainty.

Will ask Dafo43 to pitch in.
closed by Vincent de Phily (2015-01-23 14:53:48+00:00): See discussion in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27296919
opened by tabris (2015-01-22 20:16:55+00:00): Hausnummer prüfen. Die minimale Drehung würde für 6 statt 9 im NRW/ALK sprechen. Nach üblichen Schema wäre allerdings eine ungerade HN zu erwarten.
closed by tabris (2015-01-31 15:49:10+00:00): Ist HN 9. Es gibt auch ein Neubau mit HN 7 daneben. Wurde provisorisch eingetragen.
opened by iey6Om7C (2015-01-22 20:30:50+00:00): Бар-ресторан "Три башни"
opened by  (2015-01-22 20:34:10+00:00): gallinero
opened by  (2015-01-22 20:45:58+00:00): цууцукцук
opened by tabris (2015-01-22 20:52:47+00:00): Straßenname feststellen. "Windmühlenweg 1" ist schon vergeben und passt nicht ins Schema.
commented by  (2015-02-05 15:34:20+00:00): Scheint ein Fehler im NRW Atlas zu sein. 
Wenn man auf den Seiten der Stadt Enger sucht, wird die Adresse mit Windmühlenweg 24 angegeben. Weiß aber nicht ob das für OSM benutzt werden darf.
http://bit.ly/1CxXBSq
commented by tabris (2015-02-05 16:23:54+00:00): Ich weiß auch nicht ob das benutzt werden darf, weshalb ich erstmal von "Nein" ausgehe. Will die Tage eh wegen der anderen unklaren Adressen ein Spaziergang in der Gegend machen, dann schaue ich mir das gleich mit an.
commented by tabris (2015-02-07 13:25:09+00:00): Am Gebäude ich weder eine Hausnummer zu sehen noch hat der kurze Weg ein Straßenschild was die HN 1 im NRW Atlas erklären könnte. Die anderen Karten im NRW-Atlas brachten auch keine Erleuchtung.
commented by Ökkel (2016-03-10 17:10:10+00:00): Bing Maps behauptet "Liesberg 1" und die westliche Hälfte des Windmühlenwegs soll eben Liesberg heißen. Jetzt muss nur noch jemand ein entsprechendes Schild finden…
commented by Ökkel (2016-10-26 16:27:15+00:00): Och nö, nicht drauf geachtet, aber zumindest an ein Schild "Liesberg" kann ich micht nicht erinnern. Ein älterer Stadtplan kennt eine Stichstraße von der Liesbergstraße aus namens "Zur Mühle", die gibt es aber dort nicht (mehr?). Es bleibt spannend :-/
closed by Hiddenhausener (2017-03-01 10:40:13+00:00): Laut Stadt Enger ist die Adresse der Windmühle Windmühlenweg 24.
Habe die Adresse bei dem Gebäude razsgenommen und in die Windmühle geschrieben.
closed by Hiddenhausener (2017-03-03 11:11:25+00:00): Um ein Missverständnis zu vermeiden: Ich meine nicht die schon erwähnte Webseite sondern habe per Mail nachgefragt.
opened by rdinforj (2015-01-22 20:54:35+00:00): RD Informática ( rdinforj ) criamos sites, manutenção de computadores, contrato de manutenção com empresas, atendimento domiciliar. 21 98922-6752 - 21 3652-8795