piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:53:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
Thierry1030 (2024-09-17 21:25:18+00:00): and thanks for improving my "mistakes" at this roundabout! :-)
felipeeugenio (2024-09-17 23:21:35+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones.
Algunos comentarios.
1) qué intenta hacer con la cancha de futbol de San Nicolás. Definitivamente una cancha de futbol no tiene la forma que le está dando
2) por favor no realinear elementos. La foto que usted está usando (Bing) es una de varias, y todas tienen alineaciones distintas. incluso a veces cambian de alineación cuando las renuevan. Es un trabajo eterno y nunca va a tener certeza de si está bien.
saludos
woodpeck_repair (2024-12-02 23:53:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 159862440, 159862427, 159862512, 159862481, 159862457, 159862433 where the changeset comment is: revert roblox_gmx edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16954
eggie (2024-09-17 19:41:08+00:00): Dag Leike. Je vraagt feedback.. Je hebt niets aangepast hier.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=156741229
MVG
eggie
unitaxPL (2024-09-20 14:44:19+00:00): this "valley" variant is no longer built and will never be built due to the negative impact on the environment

source: https://youtu.be/iDSavTxRD7Y
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 02:20:02+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164838748
aceman444 (2024-10-11 22:31:30+00:00): Thanks, but the surface inside the station building surely isn't 'sett' (maybe paving_stones), and it is indoor=yes, not tunnel=building_passge (passage does not allow you to enter the inside of the building, which is not the case here).
Scout Jens (2024-10-12 09:57:02+00:00): Hi aceman,
thank you for your input. The waiting hall is like a passage for me, but I respect your changes. But why not "highway=corridor"?
I was in this location and sett was OK for me. But I also respect your changes in this detail.
aceman444 (2024-10-13 17:47:38+00:00): You can enter shops and other facilities inside the building and. Similar as in a shopping mall. It is not just an isolated passage through the building, where the walls on your sides resemble the outer walls of the building and you see nothing what is inside the building.
highway=corridor would be possible, but we do not use it much in Slovakia.

sett is rougher than paving_stones. Sett is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Granite_Setts.jpg and paving_stones can be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Pretty_natural_stone_used_for_paving.jpg . I guess the latter one is what is used inside this building.
JuanjoMC (2024-09-17 21:14:40+00:00): Hi Thierry,

may I ask you what is your criteria here to change this way to pedestrian?

I ask because I use pedestrian ways on parks only if they are wide enough to accomodate motor traffic. This is not the case here, cars can not pass.
Thierry1030 (2024-09-17 21:22:57+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1119423778944190
well, they put a "rising bollard', so I assume "narrow" motor vehicles could pass by :-)
but I do admit it's a edge case.
my main criterium is that this way has been clearly constructed as a paved passage for strolling ... 
other similar ways in Parc Tour & Taxis, Parc de Laeken, Parc Josaphat, etc
JuanjoMC (2024-09-17 22:04:11+00:00): I don't think that even narrow motor vehicles can ride it end to end, certainly not here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=130545196411846&lat=50.897581199972&lng=4.3837381&z=17&panos=true&x=0.01826217356428078&y=0.8002293645923633&zoom=0&focus=photo

I guess that rising bollards are there to allow vehicle access only to some parts of it.

Bicycles are allowed so, in my view, highway=path is the right tag here
Thierry1030 (2024-09-17 23:10:03+00:00): I surrender! :-) modified into path ;-) > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156750077
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-09-18 19:03:12+00:00): IMO such micromapping creates too much clutter. I'd stick to using a single way when cycleway and a sidewalk are not physically separated.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-09-18 19:13:44+00:00): Hm, both ways now allow cycling.

I guess the confusion comes from this change to highway=footway

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979875286

I'll fix the sidewalk back to highway=path and remove your change.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-09-18 19:44:16+00:00): wanted to link this changeset instead of a way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152748009
FenyMufyd (2025-03-14 16:16:00+00:00): OpenStreetMap is not a property registry; thus, do not map individual ownership of buildings or plots; OpenStreetMap bukanlah database sertifikat tanah atau plot tanah kepemilikan, Silakan baca https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parcel

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163616751
NieWnen (2024-11-17 15:40:55+00:00): Psst, to kawałek dalej. Poprawiłem.
VLD549 (2024-11-25 18:01:30+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. I can see the site indicating it to be Golfcentrum, and Wikipedia Golfvereniging. Which one should we follow?

Thank you!
resettler (2024-11-26 09:39:27+00:00): Hi,
It is also not decisive for me which one is preferred.
Therefore, a solution with the tag ‘alt_name=Golfcentrum Reymerswael’.
Then it will be found when people search on that name.
Cheers.
VLD549 (2024-12-13 12:06:12+00:00): Ok, thank you.
joel56dt (2024-09-17 18:54:43+00:00): I guess someone wanted to be clear we should not be trying something like this: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=bicycle+tightrope&iax=images&ia=images
😛
keithonearth (2024-09-21 03:25:19+00:00): LOL, exactly!
FenyMufyd (2025-03-14 16:16:01+00:00): OpenStreetMap is not a property registry; thus, do not map individual ownership of buildings or plots; OpenStreetMap bukanlah database sertifikat tanah atau plot tanah kepemilikan, Silakan baca https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parcel

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163616751
Kamil Kalata (2024-09-17 18:53:06+00:00): Kwestia ta była omawiana tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155492710
paas-nat (2024-09-17 21:07:49+00:00): Eric, este tipo de intervenção é sinalizada no mapa quando o projeto passa da fase de estudos e vai para a fase de implantação, o que não é o caso do prolongamento da Jaguarari. Irei reverter este conjunto de alterações ou então procurar uma tag mais adequada
ti-lo (2025-01-07 12:16:34+00:00): An additional apron within the launchpad is unnecessary. Didn't check all the edits, but assume there should be some clarification, probably in the general description of spaceport / aeroway components https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dspaceport
5m4u9 (2024-09-18 03:23:14+00:00): Hola, El área que editaste como Carmen 4 es un barrio, una urbanización cerrada, abierta o qué?
Hungerburg (2024-09-22 10:22:25+00:00): Hallo Lokal, willkommen bei Openstreetmap. Lokales Wissen ist das Um und Auf der Sache!

Kleine Info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:noexit%3Dyes - Das nützt an dieser Stelle gar nichts ;)
aceman444 (2024-10-26 20:34:53+00:00): What kind of piste should https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1222203464 be ? You did not add any details, if it is cross-country skiing or downhill. highway=piste does not mean much. Also it is there is no piste to be seen on Ortofotomozaika (but that one is older than your visit, so maybe they built a piste there now, but it needs more details added.
Scout Jens (2024-10-27 13:59:12+00:00): You may post the questions to the mapper, who make the first changes: 
    Bearbeitet vor 12 Monaten von laznik
    Änderungssatz #143814882
dcskobuffs (2025-06-17 19:24:19+00:00): Hola Santaloba53,

Vi que reabrieron este largo tramo de la autopista Pedernales que atraviesa la provincia sureña de Pedernales. Según todos los datos disponibles, la Carretera Enriquillo/RD-44 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48581625) sigue siendo la vía principal de la región, y la construcción de la autopista que inauguraron recientemente sigue en marcha. ¿Tienen algún documento que demuestre que la autopista Pedernales está terminada o cerca de terminarse? También hay comprobaciones de la carretera, ya que hay dos autopistas que rodean el mismo tramo de Pedernales, donde se superponen repetidamente a lo largo de esta edición.

Gracias y espero su respuesta.

Hello Santaloba53, 

I saw you have reopened this long section of autopista Pedernales across the southern providence of Pedernales. By all resources, the primary road Carretera Enriquillo/RD-44 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48581625) is still the main road through the region and construction is still underway here of the Autopista you recently opened up. Do you have any resources that prove that the autopista Pedernales is complete or close to completion? There are also highway validations apparent from having two highways circumventing the same section of Pedernales where they overlap repeatedly over the extent of this edit. 

Thank you and looking forward to your response.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-09-18 18:01:07+00:00): była dyskusja? Jak tak to podlinkuj

zmiana wycofana za brak dyskusji

proszę zaprzestaj edycji klas dróg, zwłaszcza nieprzedyskutowanych
Nathan_A_RF (2024-09-19 22:19:10+00:00): Please remember to update maxspeed:type tags when changing maxspeed tags
Adam Edwards (2024-09-23 14:45:29+00:00): Please explain.  I'm not sure what this means.  When I update the speed, the only other option is mph or kph. Is that what this means?  Apologies for not knowing.  Thanks.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-09-23 15:15:28+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:type?uselang=en-GB#United_Kingdom
bielebog (2024-09-24 17:07:05+00:00): Das ist eine Schuko-Dose an einem Laternenmast. Vermutlich eher nicht von Tesla :)
woodpeck (2024-09-20 12:20:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156865347 where the changeset comment is: Revert der Edits von Benutzer 'Daniel Schlüter', da Zweifel an der Richtigkeit bestehen, siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/neuer-user-mit-allerhand-loschungen/118958
Jarek 🚲 (2024-12-06 04:00:21+00:00): Hey madbats,

So this change, for which you wrote "High Park zoo isn't considered a "zoo", even though it's in the name", actually made one of the animal enclosures a second zoo, while keeping the existing zoo. Presumably that's not what you've meant? I can clean that up - but what do you think the High Park Zoo should be described as? I'll admit that it seems a zoo to me - there's animals on display. How would you describe it?

Cheers,
Jarek
michael_kirk (2024-09-17 21:23:03+00:00): I realized there were a couple of tags that only existed on the misplaced (now deleted) doughzone node. 

I copied the missing tags over to the "one true doughzone node" in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10577605223/history/3
seattlefyi (2024-09-18 03:19:22+00:00): Hi, thanks first for finding the duplicate restaurant, and combining tags! Deleting the node looks OK here since the building also had the removed address, but should mention that often when removing a business, it's helpful to just remove the individual invalid business-related tags instead of deleting the entire node. (This keeps the address in OSM). Thanks again!
Famlam (2024-12-18 12:36:32+00:00): Hi Gertjan, platform A bestaat al een paar jaren niet meer volgens mij, hier ligt nu een doorgang naar Doornroosje. Weet je zeker dat dit klopt? B is de meest westelijke halte, (enkel uitstap), daarna loopt het op C, D, ...
Gertjan Idema (2024-12-20 08:34:15+00:00): Ik had platform A terug gezet omdat 7 lijnen dit volgens de Netex data als eindhalte zouden hebben. Bij 4 ander lijnen zou platform B de eindhalte zijn. Als platform A in de echte wereld niet bestaat, zal ik de eerste 2 lijnen laten eindigen op platform B en een terugkoppeling doen naar Connexxion.
Gertjan Idema (2024-12-20 08:46:03+00:00): Ik zie nu dat ook 9292.nl perron A als eindhalte geeft. Bijvoorbeeld lijn 83.
Famlam (2024-12-22 14:43:51+00:00): Echt naar dat ik dit pas na maanden zag, want dit kostte een ruim uur om de schade te herstellen met alle buslijnen etc. Of ze naar het juiste perron gaan heb ik niet naar gekeken, dat wordt dynamisch toegewezen en wisselt per keer (m.u.v. het uitstapperron B) 

Zo ziet het er lokaal uit:
https://ibb.co/4RNbBtD
Het labeltje A hangt nog boven het voetpad uit oude tijden, maar dat is alles wat er over is.

De terugkoppeling naar Connection laat ik aan jou over. Als zij data uit 2015(?) gebruiken is dat best bijzonder, maar tegelijkertijd is het aan ons om na te gaan dat die data echt klopt i.p.v. klakkeloos over te nemen.

Het busstation dat je als meest rechtse nieuw hebt ingetekend (lees: de nodes hebt verplaatst) is trouwens ook puur fantasie. Er ligt geen bushalte rechts naast way 6873129. Ook teruggedraaid. 

Volgens mij ligt alles nu weer goed.
Gertjan Idema (2024-12-24 10:17:08+00:00): Dank je wel voor het herstel werk en mijn oprechte excuses voor het ongemak. In het vervolg zal ik beter mijn best doen om eerst een lokale mapper te vinden.
woodpeck (2024-09-19 06:58:39+00:00): Dear user gpneal, please provide the source(s) you have used in mapping these hole numbers. There is a "source" field that you can use when uploading data in the future; put "survey" if you have been there yourself, or otherwise point to the relevant material.
Onur Çetin (2024-09-19 14:10:24+00:00): Turgut Özal boulevard is a primary road in adres.nvi.gov.tr but    you tagged it as a secondary road
literan (2024-09-19 06:13:09+00:00): вы этой правкой
literan (2024-09-19 06:13:44+00:00): к сожалению, сломали мультиполигон жилого комплекса. 
Надо было не удалять линию "забор", а просто снять с нее тег забора, оставив саму линию.

Поправлю.
Metauro (2025-02-14 08:57:05+00:00): Hello Venera Smajlaj
 I have fixed validation error between building and highway crossing for the way 941579323 and way 1316234145
 Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
 Happy Mapping!
woodpeck (2024-09-20 12:20:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 156865347 where the changeset comment is: Revert der Edits von Benutzer 'Daniel Schlüter', da Zweifel an der Richtigkeit bestehen, siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/neuer-user-mit-allerhand-loschungen/118958
Jrachi (2024-09-18 09:50:55+00:00): I guidepost sulla relazione devono avere il ruolo guidepost, altrimenti sono solo dei nodi anonimi.
Borgo23 (2024-09-18 15:25:22+00:00): Grazie, ho aggiunto il ruolo
5m4u9 (2024-09-18 03:25:38+00:00): Hola, editaste el nombre de la plaza y confundiste por el nombre de alguna call.e. Bueno, ya revertí el cambio.
CurlingMan13 (2024-09-18 20:55:47+00:00): Changeset reverted.  Access=private should be added instead of deleting the ways.  You can read more why deletion is not the solution here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156793487
Simbul (2024-09-18 21:04:45+00:00): road as drawn goes through a house if you look at satellite image, this road does not exist.  No road here.  house and trees here, no road.
Road–Runner (2024-09-27 15:15:17+00:00): Das hier hat keinen Namen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298353259/history
https://gis.tirol.gv.at/kunstkatasterpdf/pdf/61622.pdf

Außerdem ist der Tag historic=wayside_chapel veraltet.
Hungerburg (2024-10-03 21:58:56+00:00): Seit wann ist der Herzwiesenweg wieder offen? Laut IKB ist die Baustelle noch nicht beendet und als ich dort vor ein zwei Wochen auf der Arzler Alm war, waren noch die Warnschilder dort.
Hungerburg (2024-10-04 11:36:44+00:00): Laut Forstamt ist der Herzwiesenweg beim Camillastollen bis Ende des Jahre gesperrt. Bitte um Auskunft auf welcher Grundlage die Sperre aus den Daten entfernt worden ist.
Hungerburg (2024-10-04 17:52:48+00:00): Hmm, jetzt wurde die Baustelle wieder eingetragen, aber die Sperre nicht.

In openstreetmap zählt nicht die  Menge der Änderungen sondern die Richtigkeit, oder lieg ich da falsch.
Hungerburg (2024-10-05 16:06:15+00:00): Hmm, Antworten gibt es keine?

Mich würde zusätzlich noch interessieren, warum der Weg überhaupt von richtig zu falsch umgearbeitet worden ist?

Von jemandem der so lauthals alle Beiträge als "Verbesserungen" bezeichnet darf ich das wohl erwarten?
Road–Runner (2024-10-08 17:09:34+00:00): Als Baustelle gekennzeichnet passt das jetzt schon so meiner Meinung. In ein paar Monaten tun wir den "construction" Tag weg und fertig.
Grzegorz_Kujawa (2024-10-14 21:41:59+00:00): Cześć Florek89. Dokonałeś w tej zmianie określenia nazwy obiektu fizjograficznego wg danych z PRNG. Z kilku względów nie jestem przekonany, czy to właśnie o ten obiekt chodzi. Po pierwsze, nie pokrywają się współrzędne geograficzne - te z rejestru wskazują na obiekt położony trochę na południowy wschód; po drugie, rejestr wskazuje na zarośnięte wówczas (w 2005 r.) jezioro, umiejscowione w linii strumienia, które jest uwidocznione na historycznych mapach topograficznych. Natomiast oznaczony przez Ciebie zbiornik wodny został najprawdopodobniej sztucznie wybudowany (być może częściowo na terenie dawnego Jeziora Piskorzec) - na co wskazuje jego regularny kształt zbliżony do prostokąta (ortofotomapa z 2004 r.). Dodatkowo, zmiana typu obiektu z water=pond na water=lake, mimo, że w rejestrze widnieje jako jezioro, jest tutaj niezasadna ze względu na jego wielkość.
Reasumując, wycofałbym tą zmianę, do czasu rzetelnego sprawdzenia, czy oby Piskorzec jeszcze istnieje i jaki obszar zajmuje/zajmował.
pozdrawiam
Grzegorz_Kujawa
Florek89 (2024-10-15 10:03:37+00:00): Z uwagi na przytoczone argumenty jak najbardziej zgadzam się, abyś wycofał moją zmianę z tego changesetu.
Akurat jestem w pracy, więc nie mam możliwości rozpisania się więcej w tym temacie :)
Florek89 (2024-10-18 18:36:35+00:00): Widzę, że wycofałeś już tamtą zmianę (już zapomniałem o tym). Trochę za późno, ale z lokalizacją to jak najbardziej się pomyliłem, a z jeziorem, to zdecydowanie przesadziłem - zmiana trochę na szybko
.
Jednocześnie życzę powodzenia osobie z sąsiedniej gminy i liczę na dalszy postęp mapowania landuse w gminie Kocierzew i ewentualnie Iłów XD, dobrze jest mieć w OSM takiego sąsiada od landuse.

Pozdrawiam,
Florek89
Emilius123 (2024-09-17 21:52:34+00:00): Vielen Dank.
geisthugo123 (2024-09-17 22:43:30+00:00): Das ist jetzt aber nicht ironisch gemeint und ich habe irgendwas falsch gemacht oder?
Emilius123 (2024-09-18 07:57:08+00:00): Nein, ich bin echt einfach durch alle Änderungen in meiner Region der letzten Zeit gegangen und hab mich bedankt. Alles gut.
pavvv (2024-09-18 09:09:10+00:00): Unnecessary change. In Poland and Wroclaw using check_date is a lot more popular than survey:date and it makes it easy to see the check_date at the top of the tag list. The original tag adder also wanted to highlight having surveyed information opposed to checking it online. Tags such as note or check_date shouldn't matter if they're deprecated or supposedly used more commonly. Here locally I don't think there's a single usage of survey:date and using something like check_date:survey is perfectly fine and it even makes verifying stuff easier.
marc__marc (2024-09-19 08:34:36+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for your feedback.
check_date (90 000) is indeed more common than survey:date (30 000) in Poland despite having 2 meanings (before StreetComplete, it was only used for remote check like a website or a social media, for StreetComplete it's a survey).
check_date is also used to describe a check of one tag (but survey isn't a tag).
As you said, the previous mapper explicit describe it's a survey and here is the 5 only occurences.
it's why I have changed it into a tag documented and that don't lost the fact it's a survey. 
Regards,
Marc
ObscureAngel (2024-09-20 09:07:55+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre contribution :-)

A l'avenir veuillez noter qu'il est recommandé de mettre des commentaires plus précis sur vos groupes de changements (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications)

Il est également défendu d'ajouter des éléments personnels comme ajouter "name=Mon voisin" sur la maison de votre voisin. Vous pouvez consulter la page du wiki concernant les bonnes pratiques dans OSM ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques

Merci beaucoup, passez une bonne journée et bonne cartographie ! :-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156749133
Senihtu (2025-04-16 14:38:50+00:00): Hi!
Mit diesem Changeset hast Du node 12182977241 in 3 Busrelationen eingefügt.
Hat das einen Grund?
Oder wolltest Du die stop_position Ortsmitte (node 4250178562) einfügen, die zu gar keiner Relation gehört?
geisthugo123 (2025-04-16 19:55:37+00:00): Hi, ich habe hier anscheinend die Tags der stop_position Ortsmitte von der Node 12182977241 auf die Node 4250178562 geschoben aber anscheinend vergessen auch die Relationen auf diese Node zu verschieben, deswegen ist die jetzt ohne Relationen.
geisthugo123 (2025-04-16 19:58:44+00:00): Habe das ganze jetzt gefixt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165044626
Denke das sollte jetzt wieder passen.
Vielen Dank dir fürs Nachhaken und Viele Grüße
ObscureAngel (2024-10-10 14:26:41+00:00): Hello

Can you stop doing fictional mapping ? There is no street or residential zone here...

Thanks for considering and have a nice day.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156749633
ObscureAngel (2024-10-10 14:28:13+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157718525
ObscureAngel (2024-10-10 14:35:40+00:00): Hello

Why are you deleting so many nodes here ? Since you edited these borders, many nodes have been deleted for no reason
* From https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48035149/history/12 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48035149/history/15
* From https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47983904/history/11 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47983904/history/14

Thank you for your attention and have a nice day.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156749682
mrpulley (2025-01-24 12:18:56+00:00): in mid-2024 I had surveyed Lanyon Drive as maxspeed 50 (had presumably previously been 60).
mrpulley (2025-02-08 03:37:28+00:00): Maxspeed reverted at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162265114
Hufkratzer (2024-09-18 18:45:42+00:00): Hi,
On Bing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1316254754 looks like a riding arena (and not like a riding centre). If this is true it should be tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding. Similar discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123166642
aceman444 (2024-09-29 16:06:47+00:00): Ok, thanks.
ObscureAngel (2024-09-19 17:04:04+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution !

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to :
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping ! :-)
woodpeck (2024-09-18 07:31:33+00:00): Dear GustavoMedrano1982, thank you for your contributions. In the future, please use the "changeset comment" field to provide a short explanation of your edit. Don't just write ".". Find more information on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios - thank you!