piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mrpulley (2025-01-24 11:58:44+00:00): Hobbys Yards Road (28868087), as well as adding a maxspeed, you've added ref=B64 (route number for Mid Western Highway). The southern section entering Trunkey Creek is likely to be maxspeed 50 (would need survey).
mrpulley (2025-02-08 03:31:07+00:00): I've removed the incorrect ref=B64 from Hobbys Yards Road at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162265114 - I also split the northern end at a likely maxspeed change (maxspeed change indicated on NSW speed data, but I don't trust that source enough to add the maxspeed value for the new way). I've left the maxspeed on the main section alone. Other ways not checked.
mrpulley (2025-12-13 10:06:21+00:00): 177887555 - southern section is 50, remainder correct (100). Corrected at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169613072
54503285 - maxspeed 50 (not 100) apart from from southern end approaching dam. Corrected at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175667122
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
cuzi (2025-05-18 19:33:41+00:00): FYI https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4759753
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:06:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:09:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:09:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:05:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mcliquid (2025-01-16 08:22:35+00:00): Good Morning! You're sure the construction is already finished? If yes, can we remove "access=no" too? Thank you for support and Happy Mapping!
shark (2025-01-16 09:34:06+00:00): Hi!
The whole construction is still ongoing. The road is divided and it's possible to walk/cycle through the newly built section (the gallery part). Should we remove the "access=no" tag if there is still an actual construction ongoing?
mcliquid (2025-01-21 20:51:34+00:00): Thanks for the input! I've waited for an answer from the townhall of Feldkirch and updated the access here regarding your on the ground survey. Thanks!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161615028
custodiankeyy (2025-08-08 21:20:08+00:00): Bölgenin adını değiştirmek yerine yeni bir nokta eklemişsiniz. Düzenledim.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170176343
Jrachi (2025-01-17 09:37:02+00:00): Ciao.
Scrivere tutto in maiuscolo è brutto!
Oltre che poco adatto ad OSM

Ivo
eggie (2025-01-16 08:26:07+00:00): Dag Memesis,
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.


motor_vehicle=no beter verwijderen. 
Dat geeft weer problemen met mofa en moped.
Het zal niet routeren voor autoverkeer.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse (2025-01-16 20:18:34+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161360974 for info
yelisey90 (2025-01-16 08:40:26+00:00): reverted - this roads are to public apartment buildings, to at least foot access is not restricted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161408266
jeslop (2025-08-04 08:02:31+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169939287
rhhs (2025-01-17 09:48:40+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Thanks for adding the restaurant. However you must have used an old version of the map because I also added that restaurant a month ago. I will remove your duplicate and add facebook link and phone nr to mine.
eggie (2025-01-16 09:39:41+00:00): Sven Je vraagt feedback.. Ziet er netjes uit zo.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-01-16 09:40:38+00:00): Over de bebouwde kom kun je wellicht een vlak met landuse=residential intekenen.
eggie (2025-01-16 08:55:36+00:00): Hoi,
Wel beter zo. 
Van dat voetpad heb ik een highway=track gemaak (Eigen Weg)

De Esbeek heb ik iets aangepast mbv de BGT en de laase PDOKfoto 2024. De duikers ook goed gelegd. 
De Vergertweg en Braakweg uitgelijnd. 
Het lag er allemaal net naast. (Werk van voorgaande mappers) 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-01-16 09:02:44+00:00): Je vraagt feedback. Dit klopt beter inderdaad. 
Volgens mij heeft dat pad nog wel voor de beek een aansluiting op De Braakweg. 
Aan de zuidkant de oversteek iets verplaatst conform de laatste luchtbeelden.
Groet
eggie
Max-Kritic (2025-01-16 17:18:19+00:00): je supprime 161391633. J'ai importé du cadastre par erreur.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-01-27 14:25:02+00:00): Ho fatto revert perché sono stati aggiunti i nomi dei luoghi sulle highway ma le strade non hanno nome.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161820583
infeeeee (2025-01-18 12:47:48+00:00): Visszavonva:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161489989
infeeeee (2025-01-18 12:45:11+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Amiket felvittél ebben és a többi hasonló módosításcsomagodban, társasházak zárt kertjei. A leisure=park címke semmiképp nem jó rájuk, illetve magánházak kertjeit nem szoktuk jelölni általában. Ha azért vitted fel, hogy a térképp zöldebb legyen, az tilus, ún. "Tagging for the renderer". 

További infó a wikiben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Ha kérdésed merülne fel, a magyar szerkesztő közösség elérhetőségeit megtalálod ezen az oldalon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

További jó térképezést!
aharvey (2025-01-16 08:56:35+00:00): While it seems the tagging could be improved, it's also clear that in some shape or form the ways can exist in OSM, so reverting to bring the ways back. Further work needed to determine the best way to tag these.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2025-01-16 21:28:10+00:00): Hi, your pizza place looked correct in the sense of data it had, but since it's a fake place, I've removed it.

There is A LOT missing from OSM. 
Shops, speed limits, not updated schools, inaccurate natural features, forest trails...

Explore and see which real changes you can do.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-01-27 14:25:03+00:00): Ho fatto revert perché sono stati aggiunti i nomi dei luoghi sulle highway ma le strade non hanno nome.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161820583
Lostmonkey (2025-05-16 05:40:19+00:00): Overvejer om mon ikke det er mere passende at tagge Cykeløen som en 'amenity=traffic_park' (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtraffic_park) end en legeplads? Synes beskrivelse passer ret godt, selvom det ikke er mini-veje, man kører på (bør de måske i øvrigt tagges som cykelstier i stedet for cykelbane?).
kortgodt (2025-05-17 01:11:07+00:00): Jeg er ikke enig i din udlægning. Der er ikke meget trafiklæring over cykeløen. Det handler hvis mere om at have et sted for de små at øve balance og fortrolighed med cyklen uden motoriseret trafik, det er i hvert tilfælde det mine børn bruger det til. De legehuse der er på pladsen taler også ind i legeplads konceptet mere end trafikpark.
Lostmonkey (2025-05-17 09:12:08+00:00): Der er vist lidt af hvert. Kommunen skriver at den inkluderer et område kaldet Trafikbanen: "På trafikbanen lærer børnene, hvordan de skal bevæge sig i trafikken, give tegn og forstå trafikskiltene." Men fred være med det, dens levetid er jo begrænset.
pacman541 (2025-01-16 11:17:15+00:00): Точка с наименованием деревни уже есть: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2740418401
Andrea Musuruane (2025-01-27 14:25:04+00:00): Ho fatto revert perché sono stati aggiunti i nomi dei luoghi sulle highway ma le strade non hanno nome.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161820583
Andrea Musuruane (2025-01-17 07:47:07+00:00): Ciao. Tutti quelli che hai aggiunto non sono i nomi delle strade ma i nomi dei luoghi. Queste modifiche devono essere revertate. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161411697
mavl (2025-02-05 14:02:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
amtplskaart (2026-02-06 08:18:58+00:00): Mohon jangan menempelkan geometri-geometri aliran air ke jalan hanya untuk membuat batas administratif.
rskedgell (2025-01-16 22:52:56+00:00): If you're mapping a height restriction, you probably want the maxheight tag rather than height.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight
Marek-M (2025-01-16 12:50:30+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za pierwszą edycję. Poprawiłem tutaj https://www.osm.org/changeset/161417521 pisownię nazw firm, które dodałeś. W OpenStreetMap nazwy zapisujemy tylko z pierwszą wielką literą, nawet gdy na szyldzie cała nazwa jest napisana kapitalikami (są od tego wyjątki ale to nie ten przypadek) :) Pozdrawiam.
AndreaDp271 (2025-01-17 09:30:28+00:00): Ciao, non mi è chiaro cos'hai modificato
NeisBot (2025-01-16 10:56:38+00:00): Hi Imsamuel, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 1 natural(s)
- 15 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=161413121
pitscheplatsch (2025-01-20 08:13:16+00:00): No response. Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161552164
pippo6 (2025-01-18 13:18:22+00:00): Do you know how to revert changeset 161382314? I can't revert that one because your changeset incremented the relation version number.
pippo6 (2025-01-18 13:34:05+00:00): Nevermind, I've done, next time please check the reason before a blind fix
Руслан Т (2025-01-20 11:05:32+00:00): Hello! Thanks for the information.
_zalle_ (2025-01-17 12:24:35+00:00): Das hatte seinen Grund, die Brücke existiert momentan nämlich nicht. Sie wurde abgerissen und wird derzeit neugebaut
Tomas Straupis (2025-01-16 14:56:16+00:00): O stotelės oficialus pavadinimas toks ir yra „Pagal pareikalavimą“?
Darius27 (2025-01-16 18:38:02+00:00): Taip nurodyta ant įrengto ženklo
Tomas Straupis (2025-01-17 08:00:43+00:00): Oho, įdomiai. Reikės pasidomėti. Nes juk mes maršrutą sudarydami nenorime rodyti, kad po stotelių tarkim „Mokykla“ ir „Darželis“ eina stotelė „Pagal pareikalavimą“ :-) Bet kokiu atveju, ačiū už info!
sef43 (2025-07-11 12:47:55+00:00): Sol der brücke wieder mal befahrbar werden oder gehen alle bussen permanent eine andere route fahren?
ilias_ (2025-02-05 03:44:41+00:00): Hi! You seem to have added many name:kab. But from the look of it you just added some abbreviations, such as "CNEP" for Caisse nationale d'épargne et de prévoyance, "CPA" for Crédit populaire d'Algérie, "BNA" for Banque nationale d'Algérie...
I do not think these are names in Kabyle, but really just abbreviations of the French names...
FlyGx (2025-02-24 18:47:06+00:00): Hi Ilias, I corrected it
Regard,
ilias_ (2025-02-24 18:49:00+00:00): Thank you!
Balzer82 (2025-02-04 10:02:29+00:00): Hi Andy, sind die Adressen dort schon zu sehen also Gebäude fertig mit Hausnummern oder woher weißt du die?
elsy1 (2025-01-17 17:51:07+00:00): دوست عزیز شما که ادعا میکنید نام درست این خیابان "دلتنگی" هست تا وقتی مستند اصل از شهرداری ارائه نکنی این نشان میده شما خرابکاری میکنید  من خودم حوصله ریپورت کردن و ایمیل زدن ندارم وگرنه تا الان باید چندین بار مسدود میشدی  بنابراین این بازی رو تمام کن چون لعنت و نفرین هم پشتت هست که وقت مردم میگیری بیان گندکاریتو اصلاح کنن
Maziar Soltanpour (2025-01-17 18:00:21+00:00): از ادب شما معلوم هست که در چه خانواده ای بزرگ شده اید و امیدوارم که لااقل خانواده داشته باشید ولی باز هم شک دارم. گندکاری را هم چند سال پیش پدرتان انجام داد و شما متولد شدید. لطفا توهین نکنیم
elsy1 (2025-01-17 18:55:44+00:00): Can you tell me why you don't prove that the name of the street is what you say?
SHARCRASH (2025-05-19 16:53:52+00:00): Bienvenu sur OSM pour vos premières contributions! 

J'aimerais que vous me parliez de ces traces:
www.osm.org/way/1351796403 
www.osm.org/way/1358302415 (coupure de votre chemin initial suite à une correction d'un autre contributeur) 
Elles descendent la falaise et ensuite remontent, donc aucun vélo ne pourrait faire cela. Elles pourraient avoir été créés par des motos fut un temps, mais elles sont devenues interdites dans cette zone. Même pour un piéton ce sentier ne serait pas intéressant mais je suis prêt à écouter vos faits du terrain, svp. 

Aussi le nom Weil d'où provient-il ? 

Cordialement,
ion_chi (2025-01-16 19:11:18+00:00): These barriers were removed in October. See https://chi.streetsblog.org/2024/10/07/nimbys-win-ald-knudsen-are-letting-motorheads-have-their-way-by-giving-dickens-bike-ped-plaza-back-to-dangerous-cut-through-traffic
World_Winner (2025-01-23 12:58:46+00:00): Hi ion_chi,

Thank you for reverting the changeset and feedback. I will pay attention to check edits history and the latest references, going forward with my edits.
ion_chi (2025-01-23 14:37:34+00:00): No problem, happy mapping!
Jerry_W2k (2025-01-16 12:01:12+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie sądzisz, że droga z Klawkowa do Pawłówka powinna być tertiary? Droga ta jest do ruchu lokalnego, z progami zwalniającymi. 

Ulicę Leśną rozumiem, zwłaszcza jak zachodnie obejście Chojnic zostanie otwarte.
szalona_entropia (2025-01-16 12:17:09+00:00): Nie uważam, żeby obecność progów zwalniających dyskwalifikowała drogę jako coś więcej niż residential. A to jest jednak najszybsze połączenie z DW240 na DW235.
Jerry_W2k (2025-01-16 12:26:44+00:00): Myślę, że nie. Gdyby droga Klawkowo-Pawłówko miała większą ważność niż lokalną to na skrzyżowaniach byłyby znaki kierujące na Tucholę (znak na skrzyżowaniu DW235-Kasztanowa) i na Brusy (na rondzie w Pawłówku). Takich znaków nie ma. 

Dodatkowo jest wiadukt na ulicy Leśnej - ciężarówki się nie przecisną. 

Skrzyżowanie w centrum Klawkowa jest zbudowane z kostki brukowej z progami zwalniającymi - element charakterystyczny dla drogi lokalnej. 

Jestem użytkownikiem tej drogi i wiem, że ta droga nie ma charakteru łącznika między DW240 a DW235.
Jerry_W2k (2025-01-16 12:30:57+00:00): Rozmawiałem z osobą, która mieszka blisko, jednak podniesienie kategorii jest zasadne. Dużo osób jedzie do galerii Brama Pomorza z Brus.
szalona_entropia (2025-01-16 13:16:25+00:00): Znam wyniesione skrzyżowania z kostki brukowej na drogach wojewódzkich (np. na DW786 w świętokrzyskim), to nie umniejsza  ważności tamtych dróg.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 03:49:10+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094722
stasiu512 (2025-01-16 13:11:46+00:00): Cześć, dziwna sprawa z tą organizacją, we wtorek była informacja na stronie ZTM, że w środę wraca stała organizacja ruchu i powrotem 268 na stałą linię, dlatego wycofałem twoją zmianę. Dzisiaj jednak patrzę, że wczoraj po południu usunięto ten komunikat i wprowadzono nowy iż linia wraca dopiero w poniedziałek. Czy masz informacje kiedy dokładnie kończy się ta organizacja ruchu? Linia 268 jest linią która jeździ w dni robocze więc zakładam że organizacja ruchu zmieni się szybciej.
Artur | Yanosik (2025-01-16 13:52:20+00:00): Niestety też nie mam informacji o terminie zakończenia prac. Sprawdziłem ślady GPS z dwóch dni wstecz i ewidentnie nadal obowiązuje zmieniona organizacja.
ToniHaralović (2025-01-21 14:22:18+00:00): Reverted because of accidental node creation #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161602554
MarkoŠatrak (2025-01-30 09:27:36+00:00): Reverted because of unnecessary split #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161929349
mcliquid (2025-01-16 12:53:02+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag,

bitte beachte jedoch: Changesets sollten lokal sein.

In deinem Fall bitte vor dem Ortswechsel immer alle Änderungen immer hochladen!

Um Konflikte zu vermeiden und aus Höflichkeit gegenüber anderen wird empfohlen:
• Änderungen in einem kleinen geografischen Bereich zu kombinieren (innerhalb einer Stadt, eines Bezirks oder einer Provinz)
• Änderungen innerhalb desselben Landes zu halten
• Änderungen hochzuladen/speichern, bevor man in einem anderen Gebiet weiterkartiert

Warum? Schau dir den Abschnitt "Geographische Größe von Changesets" auf dieser Wiki-Seite an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Danke für die Berücksichtigung, einen schönen Tag noch und fröhliches Mappen!
mavl (2025-01-16 16:12:19+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не очень хорошая идея перемещать точки центров микрорайонов на дороги. Лучше ставить на какое-либо общедоступное место (площадь, аллея) - ведь это что-то вроде "культурного центра" в данном месте.
Danil Moiseenko (2025-01-16 16:55:05+00:00): Добрый вечер. Хорошо я понял. Я переместил точки чтобы они были ближе к центру. Проблема в том, что в центре большинства микрорайонов нет площади, аллеи или что-то типа того (по крайней мере в Тюмени это точно). 
В любом случае, точки переместил не на дороги, а рядом с ними. Это на карте так кажется, а в редакторе нет.