piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-07-20 16:47:32+00:00): Hi Isis, this residential area should include the buildings just to the south . Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169092969
Gregory Peony (2025-07-20 00:01:45+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Please include the yards and all appropriate buildings fully within the residential areas you map. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169093021
nileshbarawkar (2025-08-04 07:12:09+00:00): Thanks for contributing in OSM.
Can you please confirm these connectors are still under construction?
Thanks.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-21 02:15:08+00:00): Resolved in https://osmcha.org/changesets/169220411
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169093126
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-28 00:44:00+00:00): Reverted POI address and details being changed to those of a different brand location in a complete other state, moved point to correct location per address and fixed other tags in changeset 183280371, and merged the relevant tags with the actual intended Texas POI in changeset 183280328

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183280371

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183280328
Gregory Peony (2025-07-21 02:21:02+00:00): Hi, you deleted a place point which contained the name of a settlement. Consider what it is appropriate for you to modify and delete based on the information sources available to you. For example it is possible to see with aerial imagery alone that the shape of features like residential areas has changed or that a settlement is likely either a hamlet or a village. For names however you'd either have to conduct a survey, or reference another source where the name is documented. If a place point's current place value disagrees with your evaluation of a settlement then please update that value rather than deleting the whole thing. Resolved in https://osmcha.org/changesets/169220513 ---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169093169
Gregory Peony (2025-07-18 21:00:45+00:00): You addressed your previously incorrect tagging of this landuse area, well done. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169093181
Frans S (2025-07-18 11:00:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
As you are a new mapper, we (validators) takes the time to review your work and comment on your mappings when there is a reason for that.
When there is already a place tag, don't add another one, please.
literan (2025-07-19 11:50:49+00:00): name только лишний, это тег для названий, имен собственных. Поправлю.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-18 20:40:23+00:00): Personally I do not think this residential area should have been mapped. I would have just mapped the obvious buildings in the North of what you mapped as a residential area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169093483
Gregory Peony (2025-07-18 20:42:11+00:00): It's potentially okay to add this place node here, though it may not be necessary to map it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169093513
Gregory Peony (2025-07-18 20:37:27+00:00): You improved the geometry of a residential area to include more buildings in its North.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169093540
Gregory Peony (2025-07-20 20:44:57+00:00): Hi, you outlined buildings with residential areas here but they are neither valid nor accurate. Landuse areas hould not overlap or be duplicated. The guidelines recommened for place point tagging are minimums i.e. there need to be at least X buildings within close proximity for them to be considered a settlement. Think about place names and ask yourself when is it likely that a village or hamlet would have a seperate name. --- Look around the area with ESRI imagery to see how I mapped it. Resolved: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169213955 ---Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169093591
Gregory Peony (2025-07-18 20:33:11+00:00): Please draw your residential areas around the settlement and not just buildings e.g. the area encircled by hedges around the buildings is likely residential and should be included. Check Changeset: 169127638 to see how I mapped it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169093660
Frans S (2025-07-18 09:22:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Being a new mapper, we (validators) takes the time to review your work and comment on your mappings when there is a reason for that.
In general, your mappings are correct. However, 1 area has been tagged as place=hamlet instead of landuse=residential. I corrected it.
Best regards and keep mapping.
Eren00 (2025-07-18 09:46:31+00:00): Merhaba KAPÇAKLAR, öncelikle OpenStreetMap'e hoşgeldiniz. Düzenlemelerinize bakarken var olan yolu kaldırdığınızı fark ettim. Lütfen var olan yolu kaldırmayınız. Bu tarz değişiklikler yapmadan önce https://osm.org/user/Eren0 hesabıma mesaj atarak soru sorabilirsiniz. Değişikliğiniz, aşağıda bulunan bağlantıda geriye alınmıştır:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169099900
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-18 08:00:47+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1415604538

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bergaufsee (2025-07-31 20:04:53+00:00): Hallo tordans,

ich hatte euch vor ca. 2 Jahren darauf hingewiesen, dass euer streetparking (welches ich grundsätzlich befürworte) meiner Meinung nach in einem Punkt problematisch ist, da es mit dem allgemeinen Parkplatzschema kollidiert oder zumindest zu Irritationen führt. Nämlich bzgl. der Erfassung der Parkflächen. Hier hast du nun einen meiner Lösungsansätze leider verschlimmbessert. Damals wurde ich recht schroff abgewiesen, mit dem Hinweis ich möchte gefälligst euer Schema nutzen, daher werde ich das hier nicht weiter erörtern, du kannst mich aber gern am Stammtisch darauf ansprechen.

Gruß bergaufsee
tordans (2025-08-12 08:20:08+00:00): Sorry für die späte Reaktion. Gerade habe ich erstmal die Bugs, die ich da im letzten Changeset eingebaut habe, korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169097627
Ich prüfe das aber nach morgen nochmal mit Blick auf die Prozessierung.

Die Fragen zum Schema übergreifend sind am besten mit Alex besprochen, er ist da am besten sprachfähig. Gerne beim Stammtisch. 

Mein Fokus ist gerade, dass wir in Berlin ein einheitliches Vorgehen anwenden, damit wir es auch einheitlich prozessieren können. Wir haben aktuell ca ein dutzend Stellen wo mit Relationen gearbeitet wird. Die können wir in der Prozessierung nicht verarbeiten (ohne deutlichen Mehraufwand) und meine Prüfungen haben gezeigt, dass einige davon auch verwirrende Tagging haben, die höchstwahrscheinlich Fehler sind die aus der Komplexität von Relationen heraus entstehen. Da das Schema gut ohne Relationen auskommt und auch so gut dokumentiert und abgestimmt ist, wollen wir sie daher in normale Flächen umwandeln.
SeyedMahmoud (2025-07-18 09:15:48+00:00): 👍🏻
mos_next_door (2026-03-07 15:54:20+00:00): Partially reverted in https://osm.org/changeset/179498402
Do not delete buildings (or anything really) to please a QA tool.
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
user_5359 (2025-07-19 09:56:44+00:00): Hello! You add the new key ave_ref to many relations. Did you mean ref:ave?
PPete2 (2025-07-19 10:14:17+00:00): Its a key regaarding the AVE-numbering scheme, as explained in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/223156
It can could be also ref:ave, but  ave_ref isn't wrong either, is it?
user_5359 (2025-07-19 11:19:00+00:00): The spelling with ref as a prefix has actually become established and allows a quicker assignment of the meaning of the key.
PPete2 (2025-07-19 12:14:48+00:00): I see, I changed them to ref:ave
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-23 13:37:13+00:00): Innacurate edit based only on iD validator without any validation or local knowledge. To be reverted.
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-23 14:18:18+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169346099
evgenykatyshev (2025-07-23 14:18:21+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169346177
NeisBot (2025-07-18 09:57:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-07-20 05:36:37+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169127614
fortera_au (2025-08-01 23:47:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 169841222, 169841249, 169841240, 169841260, 169841200, 169841256, 169841237, 169841215, 169841214, 169841228, 169841245, 169841232 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incompatible source
Dani Safa Adi Nugraha (2025-07-22 12:29:35+00:00): Mengapa anda menghapus Dukuh Krapyak dari OSM ?
f_husni (2025-07-22 12:35:26+00:00): halo, mohon maaf sepertinya saya tidak sengaja karena saya harus membetulkan jalan2 yang terputus akibat dari editan mas sendiri. kalau boleh saya memberikan saran, buatlah batas admin tidak disatukan dengan jalan atau sungai. dan jangan putuskan jalan2 karena itu sangat vital dan bahaya bagi ekosistem osm. akan saya berikan contoh membuat admin yang benar berdasarkan stnadar di osm https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5615277#map=14/-7.82614/110.41543   dan https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5615404#map=15/-7.85383/110.42660
aTarom (2025-07-18 15:15:25+00:00): Please,
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-28 00:47:30+00:00): Yup, as you surmised the location of the node was already incorrect and then they inexplicably changed the details for this Fort Collins, CO location to those of the Amarillo, TX location. I reverted this, moved the point to the correct location per the (original) address and fixed other tags in changeset 183280371, and merged the relevant tags with the actual intended Amarillo Texas POI in changeset 183280328

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183280371

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183280328
Leo Slager (2025-07-18 22:43:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Hunte (2025-07-19 10:32:26+00:00): Moin,

Wieso ist der node vom Parkplatz bis auf die Schienen verschoben worden? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13008959602
Der Parkplatz Rosenstraße reicht jetzt bis auf das Bahngelände.
berndw (2025-07-19 13:40:00+00:00): War wahrscheinlich vor dem Verschieben des Bilausschnitts in iD markiert, passiert aber auch in JOSM. 
Wennman das nicht bemerkt in irgendwo hin klickt, landet der markierte Punkt an der Klickstelle.

Kann sei, das ein Bug, vielleicht aber auch ein Feature ;-)

Ist behoben
Anton_Klebanovich (2025-07-22 12:29:31+00:00): Hi! Thank you for your feedback. I fixed the dragged point n355658342 but didn't notice Parking Lot w32426373. Thanks berndw for the correction. I will take that into account in the future.
Best regards, Anton.

Hallo! Vielen Dank für dein Feedback. Ich habe den verschobenen Punkt n355658342 korrigiert, aber den Parkplatz w32426373 übersehen. Danke, Berndw, für die Korrektur. Ich werde das in Zukunft berücksichtigen.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Anton.
Leo Slager (2025-07-20 15:57:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2025-07-18 11:06:47+00:00): Hi Hanataturi, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added a new village node with name Paloh Awe"

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
fortera_au (2025-07-19 10:59:39+00:00): These aren't parking aisles, they're waiting lanes for getting on the ferry.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169102932
Brentar (2025-07-21 11:26:46+00:00): Hi fortera_au, thank you for reaching out. Based on your feedback, I have reverted the updates.
Entbert (2025-07-18 13:30:39+00:00): Selber! ;)
ilias_ (2025-07-19 10:37:25+00:00): Tu l’as créé 2 fois
ftrebien (2026-05-08 04:44:21+00:00): Vi que você promoveu a CE-266 a primária duas vezes em junho e julho de 2025. Ela não é primária segundo o sistema de classificação em vigor no Brasil. É terciária porque não é rota principal entre lugares com população acima de 2 mil habitantes. Curatis tem apenas 546 habitantes. Mantenha a classificação dela como terciária.
ftrebien (2026-05-08 04:55:00+00:00): E ainda: Nossa Senhora do Livramento tem só 1700 habitantes.
ftrebien (2026-05-08 12:18:26+00:00): Segue a regra em vigor: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil#Crit%C3%A9rios_da_proposta
ilias_ (2025-07-18 22:47:29+00:00): Il existe déjà sur la carte
rempshaener (2025-07-18 20:31:50+00:00): Hallo,
klar tun wir das :-)
Bänke kannst du gerne erfassen - genau so.
Viele Grüße
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-27 23:11:16+00:00): Fixed dragged node and abbreviated addr:street=* and added more specific top-level tags in changeset  183278700

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183278700
Dvorný (2025-07-18 14:58:42+00:00): Rád bych se zeptal, proč jste provedl tyto úpravy geometrie, které jsou oproti původním změnám méně přesné. Děkuji
mapperue (2025-07-18 15:43:43+00:00): Která cesta?
Dvorný (2025-07-18 16:26:20+00:00): Např. kruhový objezd či napojení ulice Pod Břízkami na ulici S.K.Neumana. Změny zde: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=169104310#14/50.0137/15.7787
mapperue (2025-07-19 08:12:11+00:00): U kruhového objezdu byly nájezdy a výjezdy skoro 2x delší než skutečně i když tam není fyzicky rozdělená vozovka.
To stejné na ulici Pod Břízkami, kde bylo fyzické rozdělění skoro u přechodu pro chodce.
Dvorný (2025-07-19 12:27:47+00:00): Rozumím, děkuji.
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:24:31+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296814
shinjiman (2025-08-22 04:22:03+00:00): The public_transport=stop_position tag shouldn't be added to the bus route relation as it will reporting on the OSM Inspector as an Unknown role in a relation.
Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses#Adding_bus_stops_to_the_relation
deanleggo (2025-08-23 03:16:06+00:00): Thanks
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:24:53+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296836
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:25:08+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296857
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:26:26+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296935
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:26:42+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296951
bbdr (2025-07-18 13:46:17+00:00): Versehentlich einem noch offenen Changeset (natural=* landcover im Toten Gebirge) hinzugefügt. Sorry für die große Box!
NeisBot (2025-07-18 11:54:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-23 07:20:36+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/169327209
Leo Slager (2025-07-18 22:48:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
DD1GJ (2025-07-18 19:37:58+00:00): Revert 169101344 169106001 169105941 169105770 169105838

Hallo Team vom Rothuus-Café,

zunächst meine Anerkennung, was ihr da auf die Beine gestellt habt.

Leider hatten eure Eintragungen des Cafés in OSM einige Beschädigungen wie verschobener Gebäudeumriss und Weg hinterlassen. Zudem wurde das Café bei beiden Eintragungen in mehrere Relationen wie Radwanderwege, Kreisstraße und Buslinie eingefügt. Ich habe daher erneut die entsprechenden Änderungen rückgängig gemacht und den von mir heute morgen erstellten Eintrag entsprechen angepasst. Sollte das ganze Café barrierefrei sein, so kann dies in wheelchair-tag angegeben werden.

Achtet bei den anderen Einträgen wie Hofladen bitte auf die korrekte Syntax bei Öffnungszeiten und Telefonnummern.

OSM ist kein Marketing-Portal und Änderungssatzkommentare sollten kurz beschreiben, was gemacht wurde. Hier also z.B. "Café eingetragen"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:wheelchair

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Viele Grüße
Joachim
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:26:55+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169296976
jeslop (2025-07-22 14:29:55+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169297158
custodiankeyy (2025-07-18 21:23:55+00:00): Cami adı "Bağziçi Cami"'mi? Yoksa yanlış mı yazdınız?

Önceki düzenlemelerinizi tekrar düzenledim. Lütfen aşağıdaki linkten bakın. İlerideki düzenlemelerinizde bu formatı kullanın.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169129352
tastrax (2025-07-24 00:40:51+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
oruk09 (2025-11-19 01:12:41+00:00): 지방도 337호선은 이천 장천리에 있는 짦은 노선인가요? 다른 도로 노선과 연결점 없이 혼자 존재합니다
aaei924 (2025-11-19 03:48:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10985049 를 참고해 주시기 바랍니다.
TheNightRider (2025-07-18 12:38:27+00:00): Oops, I meant old_name tags.
user_21183540 (2025-07-18 13:54:50+00:00): Hey. Can you please provide more descriptive descriptions for your changesets rather than "update"? I am unable to tell what changes were made easily. Also, please note that Google Sat (probably) shouldn't be used due to Google's restrictive license.
mat (2025-07-19 07:18:37+00:00): Bonjour, est-ce que la grande rue est toujours à sens unique sur la section devant la mairie, ou est-ce un oubli de rétablissement à double sens ?
otb (2025-07-21 07:00:05+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre vigilance, c'est effectivement un oubli, je corrige ça tout de suite
db-ak (2025-07-18 19:17:17+00:00): A to jakaś przebudowa jest czy co, że rowery też nie mają przejazdu?
Yog Sot (2025-07-18 23:29:55+00:00): user najwyraźniej nie responduje na komenty, wiec najzwyczajniej bedzie trza zmienic za niego. 

Zapewne chodzi o to: https://www.poznan.pl/mim/wortals/czerwiec56/news,1202/slupki-bardzo-potrzebne,248141.html
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-18 13:22:26+00:00): Dude, there's five lanes here.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169107910
manjurawat_Lyft (2025-07-22 10:05:02+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza,

My name is Manju, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your comment.
As we already mentioned in the comment to this changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167679825 
“Based on the wiki, we don’t include bike lanes in the lane count because the highway=* key is mainly used by motorized traffic.
osm.wiki/Lanes#Crossing_with_a_designated_lane_for_bicycles
However, based on the other article, your enhanced approach to tagging lanes is also applicable.
osm.wiki/Key:lanes#:~:text=lane%20for%20those.-,NOTE,-%3A%20Not%20settled%3B%20orthogonal
Given our understanding, both approaches can be used. Regarding turn lanes, according to our policy: https://github.com/Test-DCT/OSM-LYFT-DCT/blob/61f7554424aefbada1fde6d22fd71523c5f99d94/osmtrainingmaterialsfeatures/Turn%20Lanes.pdf, we add turn lane tags based on markings and signs. We do not include potential maneuvers, as in this case where you added the value "through;right"

Please let us know if you have any concerns about that. Happy mapping!
7tonin (2025-07-18 12:59:08+00:00): Le fait de découper la première version de la voie pour séparer partie publique et partie privée, suggère que le numéro (la distance au carrefour) attribué à l'habitation ne correspond pas à la distance du point d'entrée dans la partie privée. Comme il ne devrait pas y avoir de voisins dans l'immédiat, cela pourrait ne jamais produire de confusion, ni nécessiter de correction.
KAPCAKLAR (2025-07-18 12:51:06+00:00): Burası özel mülk ve orada yol malesef yok
marmara_editor (2025-07-18 12:53:31+00:00): Ömerli 35 Sokak'a erişim oradan sağlanıyor mevcutta. Özel mülk içerisindeki yolları da ekliyoruz, büyük sanayi siteleri, konut siteleri. Bu tesis de oldukça büyük, içerisine servis yolu eklenebilir.