piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jaksza (2025-11-22 22:00:53+00:00): Zasugerowałem się wiki i mapką powiatową, które akurat pokrywała się z drogami tej klasy. Faktycznie mogłem lepiej sprecyzować o co mi chodziło, a mianowicie zauważyłem że na paru odcinkach w tym rejonie drogi miały inny typ niż na reszcie swojego przebiegu mimo niezmiennych parametrów. Połączenie Jezierzyc z Grąsinem oznaczyłem jako tertiary ze względu na obsługę przez komunikację miejską, biegnącą wzdłuż całej drogi ścieżkę rowerową i identyczne parametry samej jezdni w porównaniu z podobnymi drogami tej kategorii. Dzięki za info, następnym razem będę miał to na uwadze.
eerib (2025-11-21 23:38:58+00:00): Reverted CS174969644, 174969562 - Vandalism
stst415 (2025-11-21 23:41:18+00:00): Typo.  It should be "as well as Tierra Rejada Valley which is the...."
eerib (2025-11-21 23:40:24+00:00): Reverted CS174969864 - Vandalism
bikerguy12 (2025-11-22 00:20:52+00:00): Finally got you on the trail cam, If I ever see you on the trails prepare to get your shins broken
user_18023081 (2025-11-22 00:23:50+00:00): Didn't know mountain bikers were that braindead...
bikerguy12 (2025-11-22 00:32:07+00:00): Says the idiot sending hikers up trails to get pummeled by bikers
user_18023081 (2025-11-22 00:43:57+00:00): At least I don't create dozens of burner accounts just to publicly attack one specific person...
thebeastmodo1 (2025-11-23 10:49:59+00:00): bro stop vandalism on osm.
user_5359 (2025-11-23 10:22:44+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/27400185, https://www.osm.org/way/28586617. What is the mean of the tag oneway:ev = no?
czebureks (2025-11-23 15:35:50+00:00): Hi, by using this key, I wanted to indicate that all electric vehicles (but not hydrogen, hybrid, or high-occupancy vehicles) are exempt from the one-way traffic rule. I would appreciate any suggestions on how to tag this better.
czebureks (2025-11-23 15:51:13+00:00): Actually, I reread the official announcement about the new traffic organization, and it does mention hydrogen vehicles as well — maybe that will make things a little easier.
user_5359 (2025-11-23 15:54:00+00:00): Thanks for the explanation. Abbreviations are generally not a good idea, but unfortunately the discussion does not seem to be completely closed, see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Talk:Key:access#electric_vehicles.
stasiu512 (2025-12-01 17:38:48+00:00): Cześć, to mi wygląda na błąd https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520083855
stasiu512 (2025-12-01 17:40:39+00:00): Czy mógłbyś poprawić? Nie wiem od którego miejsca zaczyna się ruch jednokierunkowy.
czebureks (2025-12-01 19:37:08+00:00): Cześć, masz rację, to był oczywisty błąd. Nie byłem tam jeszcze na miejscu, ale z komunikatów wynika, że od Cmentarza Witomińskiego, więc założyłem, że od wyjazdu z cmentarnego parkingu.
stasiu512 (2025-12-01 19:38:15+00:00): Super, dzięki za korektę :)
stasiu512 (2025-12-02 13:49:20+00:00): Dla pieszych też ruch jednokierunkowy? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180299632#map=15/54.50569/18.52370 Jeśli tylko dla rowerzystów to proponuje oneway:bicycle=yes.
czebureks (2025-12-04 02:54:16+00:00): Z komunikatów prasowych wynikało, że również pieszych obowiązuje tylko jeden kierunek w stronę Witomina. To byłaby chyba dość wyjątkowa sytuacja w skali kraju. Trzeba będzie się wybrać w końcu zobaczyć jak to wygląda w terenie.
czebureks (2026-01-13 01:19:31+00:00): Od strony Witomina są znaki B-41 oraz B-9. Nie sprawdzałem jeszcze jak to wygląda od strony Wzgórza.
stasiu512 (2026-01-13 01:38:50+00:00): Dzięki za info! Jest to dosyć ciekawe, nawet jeśli od strony Wzgórza byłby znak drogi jednokierunkowej to nie obowiązuje on pieszych, pieszy ma raczej prawo w połowie drogi zawrócić bo zapomniał coś z domu;)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-22 00:48:39+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18988
stasiu512 (2025-11-24 11:22:17+00:00): Cześć, niestety muszę wycofać tą zmianę, rozdziela ona fizycznie nierozdzielone jezdnie, niszczy wiele tagów lanes i turn:lanes, dodatkowo są warningi dotyczące węzłów zbyt blisko siebie oraz o niepołączonych przecinających się drogach.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175061964
RafaBoski (2025-11-24 11:27:32+00:00): No dobra, tylko muszę dodać, że https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351532212 jest jednokierunkowa. Nie można tam skręcić w lewo, ponieważ znak nakazuje jazdę prosto oraz nie ma znaku poziomego zezwalający na taki manewr. A w prawo można jedynie skręcić używając pasa do skrętu w prawo.
RafaBoski (2025-11-24 11:28:45+00:00): Jednak z tego co widzę jest ustawione jako nakaz jazdy prosto - cofam swoją wypowiedź.
stasiu512 (2025-11-24 12:56:37+00:00): tak, dodałem właśnie jeszcze brakujący nakaz skrętu w prawo dla wyjeżdzających z tej ulicy na Piłsudzkiego.
LordGarySugar (2025-12-03 00:05:28+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175424358 - I suggest you learn what "standard tags" are before you start making damaging mass edits to OSM
hauke-stieler (2026-04-02 16:19:24+00:00): Moin,

ich wollte nur Bescheid geben, dass ich deine Änderungen zurückgedreht habe. Du hast keine Quelle angegeben, Gleise eingetragen, wo keine sind (zumindest nicht als railway=tram) und schon seit zig Jahren abgerissene Gleise eingetragen, die in der Form nie dort lagen.

Viele Grüße
Hauke
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-22 00:40:54+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13323155365

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
HashFerret (2025-11-22 19:36:09+00:00): Any clarification on this and your other deletions? It seems unlikely that this camera would have been removed within two weeks of being added to the map.
vngx32 (2025-11-24 13:07:32+00:00): Please note these trails are permitted use for cycling; please see the official guide (https://www.co.hunterdon.nj.us/DocumentCenter/View/2981/Sourland-Mountain-Preserve-Brochure-PDF?bidId=).

Under Recreational Opportunities, it states: "This park offers easy hiking and cross-country
skiing. For mountain biking, the terrain is flat
but rocky."

There are no notices/signs posted prohibiting the use of bicycles on the trails. The Hunterdon County parks and recreation department also confirmed bicycle access is permitted.
UtterClutter (2025-11-25 22:09:43+00:00): Can you explain why it is wrong to describe the electrical power network in this way?
It would also have been courteous to discuss this with me before deleting my work.
Cebderby (2025-11-25 22:41:46+00:00): Certainly: read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories
Also read the discussion with you from 2 months ago at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171884705
This relation, as created by you (and the next 60 versions modified by you) is about 0% complete of the coverage of the UK its name proposes.  How many more versions are required to complete it and maintain it?  Noone else is going to waste their time helping with this.
You can get all the substations in any required geographical area with an Overpass Turbo query, filter at will on voltage, operator etc according to the tags available, and it is automatically completely up to date with everyone in the OSM community helping.
UtterClutter (2025-11-25 23:22:02+00:00): Relations are very commonly used to structure bus routes, rail networks and cycle networks.
How are these so different from the UK power network?
Of course I would not expect to single handedly map it in it's entirety, but neither would anybody who collaborates in any of the examples above.
vngx32 (2025-11-24 13:07:06+00:00): Please note these trails are permitted use for cycling; please see the official guide (https://www.co.hunterdon.nj.us/DocumentCenter/View/2981/Sourland-Mountain-Preserve-Brochure-PDF?bidId=).

Under Recreational Opportunities, it states: "This park offers easy hiking and cross-country
skiing. For mountain biking, the terrain is flat
but rocky."

There are no notices/signs posted prohibiting the use of bicycles on the trails. The Hunterdon County parks and recreation department also confirmed bicycle access is permitted.
rene78 (2025-11-22 06:48:35+00:00): Hi SithMaster,

the tag 'building:part' was the correct one here. Can you please change it back?

Thanks and regards
Rene
LordGarySugar (2025-12-03 00:12:00+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175424425 - perhaps in the future if you think something was tagged incorrectly you could contact the user that mapped it instead of making destructive incorrect changes? For the record - using a colon (:) in tags is common practice.
Dani CS (2025-11-22 09:37:40+00:00): Indicas que este changeset "resuelve notas".
¿Puedes indicar por favor cuál es la nota que indica que la iglesia way/424878769 está en ruinas?

Te invito a utilizar un changeset diferente por cada nota que corrijas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174971648
NeisBot (2025-11-22 08:04:33+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 20 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/392704188 v5 | crossings=5
https://osm.org/way/259491444 v4 | crossings=4
https://osm.org/way/397397067 v3 | crossings=4

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3200766972 v4
https://osm.org/node/2649179985 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174971837
akadouri (2025-12-07 05:54:10+00:00): Hello, unless the bench is known as "Bench" you don't need to tag "name=Bench"

The name key is used for the name of the feature as it is called, for example a bench could be called John Memorial's Bench.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-11-22 11:59:23+00:00): In Quebec, we usually map the POIs as nodes instead of within the building tags. It is easier to maintain and it allows for standard analysis when more than one POI is inside a buidling, which is often the case. Thanks!
User721 (2025-11-22 18:06:00+00:00): Thanks for letting me know! I'll learn more about it then try editing accordingly.
User721 (2025-11-26 22:22:29+00:00): note for future me: wikidata is Q86672343
NeisBot (2025-11-22 08:04:37+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 20 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/719926036 v1 | crossings=16
https://osm.org/way/614729087 v2 | crossings=4

Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/5814358323 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=174972325
user_5359 (2025-11-22 07:58:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add more information to the church https://www.osm.org/node/4568741007 (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship)
mackerski (2025-11-30 20:11:31+00:00): Hi - given that nothing has been touched on the ground, where did these alignments come from.  If they are copied from the planning docs then we have a problem.
GeneHunt (2025-12-02 12:49:21+00:00): Hi Mackerski, It's not really a copy of a planning doc, yes it was “technically” based on a National Transport Authority Report from 2021, ie it uses a lot of the old alignment, with two options of serving Dunshaughlin, but it's common knowledge that the rail line is "proposed" between Pace and Navan, with two options for Dunshaughlin, whether it’s Sinn Fein or Fianna Fail or any other Councillor putting out flyers etc. 
In relation to the above mentioned Report, it is now old, and the route of the alignment they had planned is built now on in many areas, so I rerouted the alignment to avoid buildings to a workable route, I did this thinking it tagged as "proposed" and ready to assist in the discussion on the boards.ie – I will go a different route (pardon the pun) on showing / discussing this topic on the boards.
I’m currently removed the “proposed” alignments now.

Regards Gene
mackerski (2025-12-02 13:17:38+00:00): Yeah, I've no issue at all with the old alignment, since it is well attested and somewhat visible on the ground. Likewise any self-reasoned adjustments to that. For me, the problem would be any reproduction of alignments that can only be obtained from third-party maps (unless those happen to be based on OSM or some unknown other map of compatible licence).
ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist (2025-11-22 02:38:55+00:00): If there are any errors on this update, please let me know as otherwise what ive done here would be inaccurate. 

This is the website where i sourced my edit in. It is already built as of now ---> https://getinvolved.london.ca/eastlondonlink
Hidden Mountain (2025-11-24 12:44:41+00:00): Добрый день, я Ваши два пика откатываю по причине: 1) Пик Акбулак находится в точке, которая не имеет достаточного превышения над перевалом, чтобы ее можно было выделить в отдельную вершину. Минимальный перепад 30 метров.
2) Пик Альпийский нужно подтвердить, что вы действительно на него поднялись и назвали. У Вас есть фото, или gps трек с вершины? Ранее Ваш друг пытался уже вставить это же название на другую позицию.
aTarom (2025-11-22 08:47:58+00:00): Hi, key
"attribution"
is deprecated
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:attribution
and
gMaps is not valid source
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13323320420/history
removed
aTarom (2025-11-22 08:53:18+00:00): The map is this?
https://streetcomplete.app/p/317141.jpg
aTarom (2025-11-22 09:04:21+00:00): If it's about attributing the map images, we can find a better labeling method that isn't deprecated; I'll check with the Spanish group.
https://t.me/OSMes/171117
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-12-15 15:10:33+00:00): Hi, why have you changed the name:en for Mount Taranaki?
❤️‍🔥 (2025-12-15 23:23:03+00:00): Hi Aleksandar, the volcano was recently renamed, and the signage on the hiking trails has already been updated to use the new name. You can see this news article for more information: https://stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360639093

The old english name is now included in the old_name=* tag
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-12-15 23:28:36+00:00): Thanks for clearimg this one for me and for the article,  always nice to learn something new. Happy mapping!
ChrissW-R1 (2025-11-23 00:32:42+00:00): Please check https://oam.org/note/5064207
pitscheplatsch (2025-11-22 07:57:08+00:00): Hi,

this changeset removed the name:ar and name:en tag. Also the new added name seems less accurate for this intercity road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18666182

Could you please share the source for this change?

Thanks for your contribution!
SafwatHalaby (2025-11-22 09:25:18+00:00): היי צור, שים לב שבהרבה מקומות תצלומי האוויר של ESRI יותר מעודכנים מ-Bing, למשל באזור הזה אני רואה כמה מבנים חדשים ב-ESRI והשתמשת ב-Bing

בנוסף, צריך לזכור תמיד שתצלומי האוויר סוטים מהמציאות וצריך ליישר אותם לפני השימוש

כתבתי על זה כאן: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/id/137026
Tsur Halamish (2025-11-22 12:00:00+00:00): עשית מדריך טוב. תודה!
השינויים שאני עשיתי התבססו על מפת חום של סטראבה. התצא היה כרקע כללי.
Taksine (2025-11-22 09:50:11+00:00): 全国大部分地区基本都没什么人画的
Gregory Peony (2025-12-10 21:56:28+00:00): Hello, the footprints you added here represent buildings but could be moer accurate.

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom out to obtain the orientation and shape, then zoom in so that you can accurately draw the footprint. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the [roofs of buildings](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape#Roof_shape), but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with `shift+(-/+)`, or JOSM with `ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag`.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data and accidentally creating shared(grey) nodes. This [video about connected nodes](https://youtu.be/ltn1VOiq5_0) has more information and a guide.

After tracing and tagging features which are likely square or round, please remember to square their corners `q`, or circularise them `o`, because it is almost impossible and time consuming to draw shapes so percisely manually. Buildings with metal or pitched roofs tend to have square corners; round buildings are identifiable by the distinctive cresent shaped shadow they cast. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that it should be rounded or its corners should be squared. In the ID Editor, you can `right click` for access to editing functions. Since roofs tend to overhang walls trace the initial shape slightly smaller to allow a buffer for any change in size which may occur. In JOSM use the [buildingstools plugin](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools). In ID you must draw the shape accurately enough if you want every corner to be squared. This [video about squaring features in ID](https://youtu.be/Xs5wX592E1o) has more information and a demo.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:52:53+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
K12230LF (2025-11-22 10:49:16+00:00): Bonjour eurelien,
Vous pouvez affiner les tags pour ce type de landuse si vous le souhaitez en regardant cet article du wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Aires_d%27accueil_des_gens_du_voyage
K12230LF (2025-11-22 10:50:40+00:00): Idem pour ce qui est en lien avec les chevaux : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:%C3%89quitation

Bonne cartographie :)
user_23381312 (2025-11-22 11:40:36+00:00): merci pour toutes ces indications
user_23381312 (2025-11-22 11:49:56+00:00): J'ai une question pour  le centre équestre. J'utilise le chemin pour mettre les informations lorsque cela n’apparaît pas sur la carte. Est-ce  un problème ?
K12230LF (2025-11-23 08:14:53+00:00): Bonjour,
Je serai d'avis d'y placer plutôt un point si vous ne savez pas exactement comment délimiter la zone, et une surface si vous savez sur quelles zones s'étendent le centre équestre. Le fait que ce soit sur un chemin sera peu lisible pour les utilisateurs.
user_23381312 (2025-11-23 09:11:11+00:00): merci pour ce conseil
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:52:52+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
user_5359 (2025-11-22 07:40:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on  https://www.osm.org/relation/11245354, https://www.osm.org/relation/11245351. Can you please repair this relations?
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:52:51+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
cubbe8 (2025-11-22 05:45:34+00:00): the tracks i have deleted have no sign of existence
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:52:09+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:52:02+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:52:00+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:51:54+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:51:51+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:51:48+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
ChrissW-R1 (2025-11-23 00:32:39+00:00): Please check https://oam.org/note/5064207
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:51:35+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:51:28+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:51:17+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:51:06+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:50:57+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:50:50+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:50:40+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:50:31+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:50:22+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:50:15+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
user_5359 (2025-11-22 07:37:31+00:00): Hello! Please use for the value of addr:state the uppercase value (GA instead of Ga).
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:49:41+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:49:40+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:49:38+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:49:34+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:49:25+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:42:31+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted bythe DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655
trigpoint (2025-11-22 14:49:23+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/174990655