piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Jakka (2023-01-20 17:43:19+00:00): commerce disparu OK j'ai enlever shop=butcher
mrpenner (2023-01-20 18:47:06+00:00): Hello! Could you please use meaningful changeset comments? “aass” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse (2023-01-23 11:32:26+00:00): Hello Editor2724,
You appear to be to be involved in an edit war over https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/4027452036 .  Please don't do that.  If you believe the name is wrong please explain to other mappers what the problem is, and why you think that it needs to be changed.  Given the international nature of the conflict here, I'd suggest the main "talk" mailing list or community.openstreetmap.org
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2023-01-23 11:32:55+00:00): Merhaba Editör2724,
https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/4027452036 üzerinden bir düzenleme savaşına girmiş gibi görünüyorsunuz. Lütfen bunu yapma. Adın yanlış olduğunu düşünüyorsanız, lütfen diğer haritacılara sorunun ne olduğunu ve neden değiştirilmesi gerektiğini düşündüğünüzü açıklayın. Buradaki çatışmanın uluslararası doğası göz önüne alındığında, ana "konuşma" posta listesini veya community.openstreetmap.org'u öneririm.
Saygılarımla,
Andy Townsend, OSM'nin Veri Çalışma Grubu adına.
Jakka (2023-01-20 17:39:03+00:00):  nom "ancien Camping" ? pense pas un nom officielle d'un chemin/rue
Il y a un panneau
fredlenoir (2023-01-20 19:07:03+00:00): anciennement Camping Long Ry
Jakka (2023-01-20 19:11:56+00:00): S'il n'existe plus et que rien de visible ne peut y être vu, plus nommez. pour éviter toute confusion pour les utilisateurs
Warin61 (2023-01-21 04:58:15+00:00): What is the source of Platts Farms Pty Ltd???
Hb- (2023-01-21 18:48:25+00:00): https://www.ipart.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/submission_-_review_of_bulk_water_prices_2006-2007_-_r_platts_-_website_document.pdf
Warin61 (2023-01-22 02:27:22+00:00): And that is copyright...
SekeRob (2023-01-21 09:59:35+00:00): Ciao

Qual è la funzione di questo percorso https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/562433499 che hai mappato sopra un percorso esistente?
Nota che questo set di modifiche ha 5 avvisi di mappatura (vedi il riepilogo sopra) che sembra che tu abbia ignorato durante il ciclo di salvataggio. Non bene. Anche altri tuoi set di modifica hanno avvisi che sono rimasti irrisolti.

Si prega di agire le correzioni e rimuovere le duplicazioni. Se i modi esistenti hanno dei cambiamenti, dovresti aggiustarli.

Grazie
AkuAnakTimur (2023-01-20 15:39:37+00:00): Previously someone mapped these terraces (incorrectly) as parcels of residential landuse. I'd rather delete these...
MxxCon (2023-01-21 07:21:47+00:00): Hello.
As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description the description field MUST NOT be used for any kind of advertising messaging. As such this edit is going to be reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131513349
Piskvor (2023-01-20 17:54:57+00:00): ochoZ, wtf, tohle není Madrid :D
emersonveenstra (2023-01-23 00:47:12+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for contributing to OSM! Please note the name tag is not for addresses, that is what the address tags are for. Normally houses do not have a name tag, would you mind removing it? Thanks!
Andrea Musuruane (2023-01-21 10:15:07+00:00): Ciao. Un building=detached è un edificio indipendente (ovvero che non ha parti in comune con altri edifici), di solito occupato da un'unica famiglia. In questo caso, dalle immagini aeree, risulta evidente che non è questo il caso: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964352786 Ho rimesso building=yes, in attesa di una classificazione consistente. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131513389
glemco (2023-01-21 18:20:50+00:00): Giusto.. ho di nuovo fatto confusione con la categorizzazione di streetcomplete
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-21 23:02:31+00:00): your editions are reverted.
NorthCrab (2023-01-22 08:22:56+00:00): https://25w.pl
Ten adres strony jest niedostępny publicznie
Dodko (2023-02-12 13:42:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10570814057
to ste mali dať priamo do budovy nie ako bod ak je to značka pre budovu
eggie (2023-01-20 18:13:16+00:00): Hoi.. Jevraagt feedback.. Zie geen gaten in de verschillende routes.. zal dus best nog steeds goed gaan. 
Groet
eggie
Gonéo (2023-01-23 20:55:28+00:00): Comme expliqué en SNT, OpenStreetMap  n'est pas fait pour inscrire des données personnelles. J'annule ce changement.
Baloo Uriza (2024-11-01 21:42:21+00:00): Those landuse polygons aren't even close to right.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131514775
NorthCrab (2023-01-22 07:15:40+00:00): Dzięki że rozłączyłeś tą drogę
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-21 23:02:05+00:00): your editions are reverted.
Famlam (2023-07-16 17:13:27+00:00): Ik ben ervanuit gegaan dat Looward (op weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133851484#map=19/51.92273/5.98959 ) een typo is voor Loowaard, zoals alle andere wegen, en heb het als zodanig aangepast. Mocht dit niet kloppen, hoor ik het graag!
BCNorwich (2023-01-21 17:09:36+00:00): Hi, Are you sure these individual houses should have been deleted? It doesn't seem right. If it was a mistake I can revert the deletions for you.

Regards Bernard.
StevenBedford (2023-01-21 17:27:28+00:00): Yes, I messed up some of the existing boundaries, and didn't realise until I'd uploaded the changeset (trying to use JOSM rather than ID). I'm a novice at this, and couldn't work out how to delete the errors while keeping my work, so I decided it was safer to delete everything I'd done that afternoon and enter it again later.
MarkusHD (2023-01-26 19:22:42+00:00): Bitte darauf achten, dass beim Löschen von Daten nicht versehentlich noch gültige mitgelöscht werden wie hier die Adresse Hausnummer 85, die war nämlich noch nicht am Gebäude, sondern nur an der Arztpraxis.

Hab die Adresse nun am Gebäude eingetragen und zusätzlich den Praxis-node wiederhergestellt und mit einem lifecycle prefix versehen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix), vielleicht ist das nur eine leerstehende Praxis, die irgendwann wieder in Betrieb genommen wird?

Meine Änderung: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131744755
AntMadeira (2023-01-20 18:06:50+00:00): Olá, Vitor.
Sê bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap.
Vi que fizeste algumas edições e gostaria de te dar uma dica importante. Cada elemento só deve ser mapeado uma vez. Por exemplo, neste caso da EuroCondeixa LDA, criaste uma área e um ponto. Deves escolher uma área ou um ponto, nunca as duas. Os pontos servem para indicar elementos cujo desenho não conseguimos determinar ou quando existem vários elementos dentro de uma área (como várias lojas no mesmo edifício, por exemplo). Neste caso, como já desenhaste a área, toda a informação pode ficar na área, não sendo necessário adicionar o ponto, para não repetir o mesmo elemento.

Fizeste o mesmo nas capelas que criaste, mas essas eu já corrigi. Podes ver como ficou.
Para mais informações, podes entrar no canal Telegram da comunidade portuguesa de OSM [1].
Tens também muito informação inicial aqui:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas

Qualquer dúvida, estou ao dispor.
Bons mapeamentos!

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.

[1] https://t.me/OSMPortugal
Vitor C (2023-01-20 19:00:34+00:00): Boa tarde caro António. Obrigado pelo seu reparo. Enviei mensagem anteriormente pelo Telegram.
Foi lapso meu a colocação de área e ponto por inexperiência minha.
ou verificar o link de boas práticas que me enviou, e prometo continuar a contribuir no OSM. É o mínimo que posso fazer em retribuição de um óptimo serviço do qual também usufruo.
Obrigado pela dica.

Cumprimentos
MxxCon (2023-01-21 07:25:31+00:00): Multiple names can be listed in a single tag separated with ;
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131515544
szydzio (2023-06-30 10:55:57+00:00): Nr dróg nieoznakowane na drogowskazach (drogi powiatowe/gminne) zapisywane są w tagu unsigned_ref. Proszę ich nie dublować w ref.
marczoutendijk (2023-01-20 19:10:17+00:00): That personal information is still visible in the history.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-01-21 11:38:59+00:00): Do you want me to send redaction requests for all these cases?
marczoutendijk (2023-01-21 18:53:57+00:00): No, I 'll take care of this one.
marczoutendijk (2023-01-21 18:54:58+00:00): Done by now.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/810622860/history
Friendly_Ghost (2023-01-21 20:09:07+00:00): That's great. Would you like me to send redaction requests for similar cases when/if I find them?
marczoutendijk (2023-01-21 20:13:18+00:00): Yes, that's ok. Please use my OSM useraccount to report them.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-01-21 20:17:19+00:00): Alright, I'll do that.
ljc_jlyb (2023-01-21 01:04:17+00:00): name=*标签应该只包含名称，而不是描述对象的类型或位置或其它属性（如高度、海拔 、操作员、访问限制、分类/认证/质量标签等）。
-摘自OSM wiki
vasony (2023-02-14 15:00:00+00:00): Tisztelt Szerkesztő!

A családbarát közösségi tér most dupla, szerepel pontként is a 14-es épületen, illetve maga a 16-os épület is meg van jelölve.
Ha a közösségi tér nem a teljes épületet foglalja el akkor az épületen jelölés nem helyes, kérem írják meg, hogy most pontosan mi is a helyzet, illetve ha a 14-esen nincs, akkor húzzák a helyére a pontot.

Továbbá észrevettem, hogy most a környező házak Széchenyi István utcára vannak jelölve, ha ez mind Városház tér, akkor kérem ebben segítségüket a javításhoz, hogy ezen házak címei is rendben legyenek.

Tamás
abakus_uploader (2023-01-20 23:34:50+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-21 09:10:06+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 131503279, 131503291, 131503300, 131503308, 131503314, 131503329.
map per (2023-01-21 06:25:34+00:00): Hallo Cipher DD,

und wilkommen bei OpenStreetMaps.

Du hast um review gebeten:
War das Absicht hier mehrere Straßen zu verändern (vgl. (1))? 
Und das auf der Dachauer Straße in München (2) hgv=delivery gilt kann ich mir kaum vorstellen. Welche Schilder stehen denn dort?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131517005&relations=true
(2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102489827
map per (2023-01-22 06:48:56+00:00): Hallo Cipher DD,

danke für die Antwort in der persönlichen Nachricht.
Die https://stadt.muenchen.de/infos/lkwumleitungskonzept.html Seite als Quelle hat aber leider mehrere Probleme. Der Artikel ist vermutlich von 2008 und damit e.v. veraltet. In Straßenfotos von 2015, die für OSM freigegeben sind, sind die Schilder nicht zu sehen.
Leider steht im Impressum von muenchen.de auch, dass der Inhalt der Seite urheberrechtlich geschützt ist. Man darf also vermutlich keine Daten von dort in OSM übertragen.
Solche Verbotschilder sollten am Besten mit Ortskenntnis oder nach vor Ort Überprüfung eingezeichnet werden.

Es ist auch nicht gut einzelne 100m Straßenstücke mit ghv=delivery zu kennzeichnen, da sollten eigentlich alle Straßen im Bereich für den das Verbot gilt so gekennzeichnet werden. (e.v. ist die Beschilderung in München aber so Lückenhaft, dass es garkeine klar definierten Bereich gibt)

Welche Quellen hast du für deine anderen Änderungen verwendet? Die sehen auch noch sehr inkonsistent (immer nur ein 100m Stück) aus.

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
jeka p (2023-12-11 18:53:16+00:00): Hi!
Vor Ort ist dieser Wegweiser mit "Kälberweide" markiert.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1691108111/history
Welcher Name ist jetzt der richtige?
SG
mcliquid (2023-12-17 08:41:08+00:00): Hi, im PDF steht auch "Kälberweide", ich habe es korrigiert.
abakus_uploader (2023-01-20 23:34:49+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
fredlenoir (2023-01-20 19:19:58+00:00): Bpost est au n°44 mais le plan n'est pas correct (le PICC n°43 n'existe pas cf geoportail )
Jakka (2023-01-20 19:28:41+00:00): ctrl+F5 pour renouveler correction ;)
JeroenHoek (2023-01-20 19:07:15+00:00): Kan de boer hier nog komen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6487297

Vanaf de Weverij denk ik?
E de Wit (2023-01-20 19:24:07+00:00): Ik vermoed (tijdelijk) via de Weverij.
Voor een permanentere oplossing ga ik er van uit dat de onderbreking tussen de Nije Werpsterdyk weer opengesteld wordt (behoud historische context)

Van het voorjaar / zomer maar even een fietstocht maken in dat gebied. Er verandert ontzettend veel nu
JeroenHoek (2023-01-21 08:18:58+00:00): Inderdaad. Ik ben benieuwd wat ze met dat stukje doen. Dat laatste eindje Uniadyk is ook al gesloten (maar nog niet weg).
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-05 11:29:35+00:00): Hi, these are not really parking lots, aren't they? Just a street where you can legally park. Parking spaces aren't even marked.

I believe that parking:* directly on the road is a better option here. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:both
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-05 11:31:46+00:00): see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street_parking
literan (2023-01-21 11:54:59+00:00): оптимальнее поставить maxspeed=RU:living_street - так в будущем, если вдруг изменят ПДД (например, опустят с 20 до 10 км/ч), не придется править все дороги, а достаточно будет настройки навигатора.

Аналогично ,RU:urban и RU:rural

навигаторы эти теги уже понимают
MoMiKaBe (2023-01-20 19:19:25+00:00): Dieser POI kann gelöscht werden. Ich habe ihn versehentlich 2x erstellt.
user_5359 (2023-01-20 19:59:36+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Mal abgesehen, das „Liegewiese“ kein Name des Bereiches ist sonder ein Nutzungsbeschreibung (description) ist: was sollen uns bei https://www.osm.org/way/1133883347 das doppelte Minuszeichen nach dem Name Liegewiese sagen?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Olaf der Mapper (2023-09-22 15:35:42+00:00): Eieieiiiii dat gibt Ärger, wenn das der DD1GJ sieht, dass hier Daten 1:1 aus dem urherberrechtlich geschützten Bestand des Geoportal BW übernommen wurden. LG Olaf
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
ygcgjp5 (2023-01-24 18:18:28+00:00): Iš kur tie rajonų pavadinimai?
Gonéo (2023-01-23 21:14:01+00:00): Merci pour votre contribution. Je n'ai pas remarqué d'erreur flagrante.

En ce qui concerne les limites de vitesse, il est conseillé d'ajouter source:maxspeed=FR:rural pour le 80 km/h et source:maxspeed=FR:urban pour le 50. Ceci permet de faciliter le suivi (exemple du passage de 90 à 80). Pour le 30, si c'est un simple limitation c'est source:maxspeed=sign, en zone 30 (réglementation différente) c'est source:maxspeed=FR:zone30

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:source:maxspeed

Bonne continuation
Lino167943 (2023-01-23 21:18:09+00:00): Merci beaucoup pour votre retour, je prends note de vos conseils, et continue de parcourir le wiki pour m'instruire.
Bonne journée
maraf24 (2023-01-23 10:12:13+00:00): Szkołę, by była widoczna jako szkoła,  należy oznaczyć kategorią "szkoła" (amenity=school).
Tutaj najlepiej byłoby wyrysować teren szkolny i go oznaczyć.
Bo w tej chwili jest tylko budynek o nazwie "Gminny Zespół Szkolno - Przedszkolny nr 3 w Rębielicach Królewskich"
bartgron (2023-01-23 10:17:32+00:00): Ok rozumiem
maraf24 (2023-01-23 10:10:11+00:00): W edytorze można włączyć podkład z obrysami budynków (integracja).
Dzięki temu można dokładnie i prosto wyrysować budynek, a nie wg dachu.
bartgron (2023-01-23 10:15:30+00:00): Nie mogę tego znaleźć :/
NorthCrab (2023-01-23 10:40:35+00:00): https://i.imgur.com/LtlRxj9.png
maraf24 (2023-01-23 10:41:29+00:00): Jest pod nazwą "Geoportal 2: Ewidencja budynków WMS".
Słowo "integracja" poajwia sie dopiero w dymku na tym podkładzie.
Poza tym jest jeszcze klawisz Q - powoduje on prostowanie kątów obszaru (tu: budynku). Bo widać, że ten budynek jest krzywy :)
bartgron (2023-01-23 10:50:09+00:00): A co oznaczają w tej ewidencji m1 t1 itd?
NorthCrab (2023-01-23 10:54:57+00:00): Numer najwyższej kondygnacji,
legenda: https://kamienicznik.wordpress.com/2013/04/27/legenda-do-mapy-zasadniczej/
NorthCrab (2023-01-23 10:55:25+00:00): Ale to jest czasem niezgodne z prawdą więc nie bierz wszystkiego jak jest :P
maraf24 (2023-01-23 11:00:16+00:00): Wszystko na tej mapie z Geoportalu może być niezgodne z prawdą, dlatego lepiej znać teren osobiście (lub umieć korzystać z orto).
bartgron (2023-01-23 11:24:06+00:00): Spoko i tak dopiero jak znam osobiście  okolicę to zmieniam
NorthCrab (2023-01-22 08:25:07+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!
Ten komisariat jest oznaczony od roku:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158585174
Na OpenStreetMap tworzenie duplikatów jest błędem dlatego też usunę dodane przez ciebie oznaczenia. Pozdrawiam!
gscholz (2023-01-26 09:13:01+00:00): Hi kapazao_import,
this changeset has created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-3.74624&lat=37.03693&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131520027

Can you please fix this?

This kind of error irritates routing software an looks ugly on the maps.

Kind regards
Guido
kapazao (2023-01-28 09:45:41+00:00): Hello gscholz,
I have not made those errors, they have appeared after removing the redundant tag. The problem was hidden and it was made by other users who did not edit the zone as they should.
I can fix some of them, but it is not my task.
Thank you for the comment.
Regards
kevinschaul (2023-01-20 19:18:44+00:00): https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/boundary_type=maritime
Glassman (2023-01-22 20:42:38+00:00): Boundary maritime is used for areas of seas clamined by countries. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dmaritime. I'm not sure that the one you added near Houston applies
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131520159
Glassman (2023-01-22 20:43:16+00:00): I would suggest reviewing this edit after consulting with the wiki page I provide. Let me know if you need help
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131520159
kevinschaul (2023-01-23 19:22:40+00:00): Thanks for the help, Glassman. I've removed the maritime tag from the Houston-area ways: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131621613/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131520159
maraf24 (2023-01-20 19:46:23+00:00): Powinieneś użyć destination.
destination:lanes nie jest błędne, ale po co go używać, skoro wszystkie pasy mają to samo destination?
bartgron (2023-01-20 22:31:14+00:00): Ok rozumiem a wyjaśnisz mi jak używać tego destination:lanes w przypadku gdy pasy mają różne destination?
NorthCrab (2023-01-21 04:22:20+00:00): A|B|C
lanes=3

A|B
lanes=2

A
lanes=1
bartgron (2023-01-21 06:02:16+00:00): I to od lewego pasa do prawego?
NorthCrab (2023-01-21 06:09:19+00:00): Tak jest, od lewego w sensie kierunku jazdy - dla jasności.
chuckfinley71 (2023-01-20 20:42:18+00:00): Hi Graptemys, thanks for fixing up some of these typos. Just curious, what is your data source for the happy_hours key? I took a quick glance in the areas I know, multiple restaurants don't sell alcoholic beverages at all, much less have a happy hour.
Graptemys (2023-01-20 20:54:03+00:00): Oops that was a mistake. There was one restaurant with a cuisine along the lines of "cusine=burger;happy_hour" so I changed it to "cuisine=burger" and "happy_hours=yes". It appears that I accidentally had many restaurants selected and applied the change to all of them. I still have the data downloaded in JOSM so it will be an easy fix. Thank you for noticing it and letting me know.
Graptemys (2023-01-20 21:07:26+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131522973. I found the restaurant that should have gotten the tag, it was Wing's 'N More in College Station. I spot checked the others and it looks like the cuisines and other tags were not affected.
chuckfinley71 (2023-01-20 21:41:17+00:00): Thanks! Glad it was an easy fix. :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.