piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2025-07-29 10:40:28+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. (sorry for the late respons)
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------

A: Inaccurate mapping
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
D: Connecting Nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.

Explanation can be found in this document what might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166053791
Timmy_Tesseract (2025-05-11 09:57:04+00:00): Good afternoon and thanks for your continued contributions to OSM!

Is it possible that you're not aware of the OSM message inbox? I've sent you two messages with explanations and links to mapping conventions for road classifications. The fact that you repeatedly upgraded the same roads to highway=tertiary makes me think you might not have received these messages.

Here's another example for some of the roads edited in this changeset: Arellano Street, Primitivo S. Osita Street, Ireneo S. Osita Street, Doña Lourdes Street and the road in Depita Subdivision all run parallel to each other.

Tertiary classification is used for the main roads in and between barangays. Having 5 tertiaries in such close proximity does not seem to be justified here. Arellano Street and the road in Depita clearly have higher importance by design as they do allow for crossing of the national highway while the 3 roads in between have a more local function primarily serving traffic to and from destinations around Osita Subdivision. Given the increasing amount of non-residential establishments in the area highway=unclassified seems appropriate for these. 

Looking forward to hear your thoughts on this!
lankapuhelin (2026-02-15 21:05:38+00:00): Mielestäni tässä https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1385257587 ei kannattaisi käyttää lainkaan access-arvoa, kun perustetta ei ole (ei pihamaata)
user_5359 (2025-05-11 13:45:11+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/997077235
which key is correct?
amenity=fire_station
disused:amenity=fire_station
AndrewEMT (2025-05-11 13:59:35+00:00): Unfortunately, I'm not sure. The company website announced they merged with another fire company years ago, and I don't know if they are still using that station; it's looking kind of run-down.
AndrewEMT (2025-05-11 19:27:06+00:00): I have a query into the department to confirm whether the fire station is still in active use.
AndrewEMT (2025-05-11 20:28:23+00:00): The fire chief confirmed that the Martin's Corner fire station is closed.
Dodko (2025-06-06 15:07:45+00:00): Don't duplicate the same POI, maps.me and organics maps use the same data source.
𝔸𝔹_ (2025-05-16 03:47:26+00:00): Why does Rt-9 get to be a Trunk, but Rt-20 does not?
𝔸𝔹_ (2025-05-16 03:52:49+00:00): Rt-20 is definitely a class of road above most of the "Primary" roads it intersects with.  It should be classified so that it's importance in the road network.
cubbe8 (2025-05-16 03:53:32+00:00): It’s based on functional classification as stated in the classification guidelines.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance


https://geo-massdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/functional-classification/explore?location=42.855393%2C-72.046058%2C7.63
𝔸𝔹_ (2025-05-16 04:10:16+00:00): But why does the OpenStreetMap Highway tag needs to equal the State's "Functional Class".  Why isn't the state's functional class just an attribute on the road?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance#Trunk


It says "Between and around the largest population centers, it may be appropriate to tag additional routes as trunk beyond these guidelines, in order to emphasize the presence of multiple high-quality long-haul routes and/or to differentiate them from less-significant surrounding roads."

Rt-20 deserves to be differentiated from less significant roads.
cubbe8 (2025-05-16 04:16:31+00:00): Most of the roads that intersect US 20 are over classified. They have just not been changed.
cubbe8 (2025-05-16 04:17:46+00:00): US 20 is not a high quality long haul route. Functional classification takes all of this into consideration.
cubbe8 (2025-05-16 04:19:35+00:00): It also says “ The Trunk classification generally should not be applied to highways that are parallel to motorways, especially highways within a short distance (less than 5 miles) from the motorway.”

Route 9 is not within 5 miles. US 20 is.
𝔸𝔹_ (2025-05-16 04:26:35+00:00): Key words: "generally".  and "and/or"

There is a classification here that we could/should be using to differentiate a hierarchy.

Especially in Western MA where there are so few exits on the Mass Pike.

Rt-9 is less than 5 miles from the mass pike from 495 inward...and it's still classified as a trunk.  They are similar style roads that they deserve to be classifeid as the same type of highway tag in Massachusetts.
𝔸𝔹_ (2025-05-18 19:55:17+00:00): Rt-20 qualifies as a trunk road.  It is the next hierarchy road after the Mass Pike in Massachusetts.  Yes, it often parallels the Mass Pike, but it is the recommended alternative, and should be classified as such.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166446837
vrix (2025-05-11 11:15:12+00:00): Hi eokeefe, I think that one of the recent changeset that edited features of "Relation: Madison (3352040)" might have inadvertently broken something: you can't find R3352040 in Nominatim anymore https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=R&osmid=3352040

This needs fixing
TrickyFoxy (2025-05-11 00:28:51+00:00):  👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении
user_5359 (2025-05-11 10:34:43+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1385268107 (one of twenty objects). What ist the mean of the tags
Lankroll = Normal
Ordningsnummer = 4333
Vard = Ja
Metzor (2025-05-10 07:24:36+00:00): Ooooops, da gab es einen Versionskonflikt und ich dachte, mit "Übernehme Server-Version" wird alles gut. Leider nicht. Ich reparieren das heute Abend.
ChehrehBargi (2025-08-20 18:07:04+00:00): There is no village named Ajor Pazi in Ardabil.
sgalaxya71silver (2025-08-22 08:34:15+00:00): This village has been gradually and illegally constructed by individuals since 2006 (1385 in the Persian calendar). As an employee of one of the relevant organizations, I am closely familiar with the circumstances of this village. Even if you were to visit, you would observe that illegal connections for electricity, gas, and water have been established, and there is also a lack of proper infrastructure.

Regarding the naming of this village, according to the National Cartographic Center (I have provided the link below), the official name assigned in the latest update (dated 2023/1402) is "Ājurpazi-e Irân / Aliābād 2" . This village, which has been gradually developed since 2006 and now has a considerable population. My authority on this matter is this official document.

While it is true that local residents refer to it simply as "Aliābād," the official document includes the designation "Ājurpazi-e Irân / Aliābād 2". I cannot apply personal preference in the naming of villages, as doing so would create discrepancies between many officially registered village names in the province and the names recognized locally and used on personal identification documents.

Furthermore, I have provided this information on this platform because many agencies—including Emergency Services, the Police, and the Fire Department—utilize this mapping data. My objective is to facilitate faster and more accurate address location for these organizations.https://amar.org.ir/Portals/0/Geo/maps/1400/24/2401010002.pdf?ver=7wtzXRLAPBQn9DjXY9BOPw%3d%3d
sgalaxya71silver (2025-08-22 08:49:45+00:00): Besides, it has a rural municipality (Dehyari), and the name of that rural municipality is Aliabad, in the Balaqlu Rural District, Central District.
sgalaxya71silver (2025-08-22 08:54:52+00:00): Information about this village is also available on this site.
https://data.roostanet.com/
sgalaxya71silver (2025-08-22 09:38:15+00:00): Furthermore, if you refer to the Bonyad Maskan Ardabil, this village under the mentioned name has a Tarh-e Hadi.
ChehrehBargi (2025-08-22 12:24:39+00:00): Hello
I have passed by here several times and the things I have seen are similar to what you said. But I have not seen a sign for the village and I thought that this was a continuation of the city. Considering the links you have provided and you are sure of their accuracy, I will restore your previous edit exactly so that the history remains intact and there is no need to register again. Registering correct information will definitely help all people and even organizations.
ChehrehBargi (2025-08-22 12:27:46+00:00): Given that this place has two names, the new and the old, we should use both in separate tags. And it would be better to specify the village area as well. Do you have a photo or PDF file for the village area?
Marc_ch (2025-05-11 11:55:15+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenu,
merci pour ces ajouts.
cependant la maison ne porte surarment pas le nom de 86 ou 88.
86 ou 88 semble être le numéro de rue, il se renseigne dans un autre champs de l'éditeur.
n'hésites pas à me solliciter si tu as des questions.
Salutations,
Marc
apboz (2025-05-12 11:40:01+00:00): Cher Marc, super merci, je ne savais pas et j'ai mis le numéro en pensant que c'était le numéro de la rue, désolé, merci pour la correction. Je profite de demander comment faire pour charger en local une carte que j'ai modifiée (en ajoutant les numéros de téléphone par ex) pour un voyage que je vais faire en Australie. Je n'ai pas trouvé le truc pour charger la carte sur mon portable et pouvoir l'utiliser sans avoir une connexion car en Australie il n'y a pas une couverture de tout le pays. Existe-t-il un tutoriel ou un forum permettant d'avoir les infos ? Merci pour l'appui. Meilleures salutations. 
Alain
user_5359 (2025-05-11 10:21:07+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1384715617. What is the mean of the tag câble = torsadé? What is the difference to cables= torsadé (or the other two combinations see taginfo)?
Vinber-Pro (2025-05-11 11:14:51+00:00): bonjour et merci pour ces contributions,

mais pourquoi mettre cutting=yes ? cela ne me semble pas vraiment adapté si https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:cutting

le highway=path est sans doute suffisant non ?

bonne cartographie
ThatOtherGuy (2025-05-10 23:30:27+00:00): This changeset removed a number of edits that have been made since the airport closed, including a new road at the south end where the airstrip is now removed. You should be aware when making edits like this that the aerial imagery is not necessarily current.
Necessarycoot72 (2025-05-11 19:59:17+00:00): Ah, sorry about that. I'm used to deleting bad roads added by tiger that I thought that one was one of them. readded
ThatOtherGuy (2025-05-11 20:01:42+00:00): Fair play, no harm no foul
Frans S (2025-05-11 10:11:36+00:00): Hello Co, Please check the instructions how to map and tag informal buildings.
Ad just 1 node and tag it as building=yes
Thanks
Frans S (2025-05-12 08:07:28+00:00): Hello Co, Please check the instructions how to map and tag informal buildings.
Ad just 1 node and tag it as building=yes
Thanks
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-10 08:00:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12825329552

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
lyctkel (2025-06-05 07:01:12+00:00): Hi Yuxian,
at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12825323651 you wrote 
recycling:plastic=yes
That's unusual. I had mapped around 60 times  recycling:pmd=yes in Zoetermeer.
Did you mean that as well, but you were restricted by StreetComplete to fill it in correctly?
Kind regards
lyctkel
Map_HeRo (2026-05-24 17:30:34+00:00): Hallo gunnar1m,
du hast hier vor einem Jahr diverse Gleisstücke und einen yard eingetragen. Nichts davon ist mehr vor Ort sichtbar/verifizierbar. Vielleicht magst du diese Objekte in die OHM übertragen? Ich werde alle "razed" Teilstücke in dieser Gegend demnächst löschen, wie in der community besprochen.
Gruß Mikke
AndyB_66 (2025-05-10 11:21:50+00:00): Jeszcze raz - stosuj się, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-10 16:02:05+00:00): Typ nie odpowiada nikomu tylko robi swoje. 

Wycofa mu się parę zmian to się ocknie.
AndyB_66 (2025-05-11 10:09:48+00:00): Nie wycofa (bo zmiany wyglądają OK), tylko zgłosi do adminów i dostanie bana na parę dni - wtedy (może) dostosuje się do standardów społeczności OSM.
silversurfer83 (2025-05-10 09:01:30+00:00): Hi Dwight

maybe slow down a tiny bit with the Rapid Editor. You're moving rather quick here.

One thing: "As per Bing Maps Aerial" is a source, not a proper comment. Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166058860
Fizzie-DWG (2025-07-03 04:52:34+00:00): DWG revert - inexplicable mapping & unknown sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168424850
mueschel (2025-05-11 08:48:37+00:00): Hi,
you added two memorials with a huge amount of text in the tags. Is all this text in the various languages actually present on the memorial? If not, it shouldn't be in OSM - a link to Wikipedia or Wikidata containing all the details about the person is sufficient.
toponymia (2025-08-14 12:44:08+00:00): Hi mueschel

Thank you for your comment on my changeset (166059944) in which I am mapping two memorials at the church of Aasiaat (Greenland).

You were asking: "Is all this text in the various languages actually present on the memorial?".
I have not tagged the inscriptions of the memorials, but instead I used the description-tag to describe the people to whom the memorials were erected.


The beginning of the guidelines for the description-tag on the wiki-site  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description  reads like this:

"The description=* tag can be used to provide additional information about the related element to the end map user, possibly using a pop-up or similar. Text should be kept short; a few words or perhaps one to three sentences at most. Longer information can be provided by tagging a link to Wikipedia or other external website using wikipedia=*, wikidata=*, url=* or website=*."

In my opinion, the description-tags that I have made comply with the guidelines described on the wiki-site.


When it comes to my mapping of the memorial for Frederik Lynge who is a more significant historical figure, I have chosen to add information about him in the languages (beside greenlandic) that I consider most relevant to the tourists and others who typically visit the town. (Of course, also taking into account the few languages in which I can write texts that are reasonably comprehensible.)


I don't have much experience tagging memorials (as far as I remember, these memorials were the first that I mapped), so maybe there is something I haven't understood well enough. Feel free to contact me if you think I have misunderstood something or if you have any questions. 
I apologize for taking so long to answer you.

Greetings
toponymia
mueschel (2025-08-14 12:57:42+00:00): Hi,
the 'description' tag is fine (although nobody used 'description:subject' before, but 'subject:description' is used a dozen times and might be a better choice)

I referred to the 5 translated "person:job" tags (also used nowhere else). 

- in general, translations should not be tagged - simple things like this can be translated automatically very well
- "job" is a rather modern word, something like "profession" seems to be a better fit for a person with a memorial.
- I'd prefer this kind of information within the description and not with its own tag - it's very unlikely that there will be more than a few of these around the world. 
- In general we should have a wikidata or wikipedia link for the subjects where all information can be retrieved easily
mueschel (2025-08-23 16:30:58+00:00): The cases of multiple descriptions you found are mostly the two local (or at least one used close by) languages, plus English as a global alternative.
The German translation seems a bit random - why not French or Spanish?

Sure, ancient words and rare languages might cause some trouble in automatic translation, but I guess as soon as we have a description in plain English, most problems should be solved.
perusluku (2025-05-10 09:58:09+00:00): Hello and welcome to editing! This restaurant was added 9 days ago (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12802543701), Organic Maps wasn't just updated yet :)
user_5359 (2025-05-11 10:23:51+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1385301596. what ist the mean of the tags
CharacterString = Verordnung: LGBL. 67/1970
Date = 1970-04-07
gml_id = K3068940
language = ger
legalFoundationDate = 1970-04-07T00:00:00+01:00
legalFoundationDocument|CI_Citation|alternateTitle|CharacterString = Land Kärnten, Verordnungen und Bescheide nachgeordneter Behörden
localId = K3068940
namespace = AT.0019.9af8e57e-61e0-4091-abec-b0c5153a17af
percentageUnderDesignation = 100
script = Latn
siteProtectionClassification = landscape
text = Landschaftsschutzgebiet (LSG) - LSG Kreuzbergl
(No other OSM keys exists)
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-10 09:40:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12825476963

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Frans S (2025-05-13 10:10:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 

Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping.
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
D: Connecting Nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared.
G: Included the shadow of the building.
H: Included a yard of clearing.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166060899
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-10 12:48:15+00:00): שלום ותודה על התרומה ל-OSM! 

נשמע שניסיתם לתקן משהו אבל גררתם את הכביש בצורה לא סבירה. החזרתי את זה למצב הקודם.

מה ניסיתם לתקן כאן?

ניתן לראות הנחיות לתרומה כאן: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HE:Israel
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-10 09:40:50+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11492917066

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bartgron (2025-05-10 21:38:17+00:00): Nazwa paczkomatu oraz jego kod są podane w innych tagach, przywróciłem do poprzedniego stanu
eggie (2025-05-10 13:21:08+00:00): Dag Gendov,

Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke.
Je hoeft geen bicycle=no te taggen op voetpaden.
Dat is default.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-10 13:03:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Osmwithspace (2025-07-09 07:41:47+00:00): Gibt es Schilder, die den Weg als Fahrradweg ausweisen?
Wenn nicht, könnte bicycle=yes besser passen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle%3Ddesignated
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166062578
Osmwithspace (2025-07-09 07:42:30+00:00): Gibt es Schilder, die den Weg als Fahrradweg ausweisen?
Wenn nicht, könnte bicycle=yes besser passen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle%3Ddesignated
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166062578
silversurfer83 (2025-05-10 15:03:50+00:00): Hi :)

sieht schon ganz gut aus. Du müsstest aber vor dem Upload noch eine "Fehlermeldung" oder Warnung bekommen haben, dass irgendwelche Objekte sich kreuzen. Auf solche Warnungen solltest du achten und dir genau ansehen, was dir da angezeigt wird.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166062927
Lenkradfreek (2025-06-20 18:34:18+00:00): Hallo,

das rechte Gleis (von Kurhessen-Therme bis Kreuzung Rolandstraße) hast du mir service=yard und maxspeed=25 getaggt, was aber beides nicht stimmt.

War das ein Versehen, weil du die Gleise auf dem Betriebshof Wilhelmshöhe so getaggt hast?
dadavid (2025-05-29 21:50:10+00:00): Danke fürs spotten beim ersten Mal :) 

VG 

David
lakedistrict (2025-05-11 09:16:46+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Which OS maps/datasets are you using, and have you surveyed any of these roads in person before changing their classifications? Not all OS maps have suitable licences, although OS do release some open data and many older maps are now out of copyright. I haven't checked all of the changes made, but highway=unclassified was probably a better fit for Crag Road. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright_information_for_UK_mappers, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom for further info.
Luzandro (2025-10-27 17:03:24+00:00): Hallo,

du hast hier mehrere, sich schneidende Gebäude erzeugt. Bei den Reihenhäusern kann man entweder den gesamten Reihenhausblock als ein großes building=terrace angeben oder die einzelnen Einheiten als building=house + house=terraced, aber nicht beide Varianten gleichzeitig

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace

bei der zweiten Variante sollten die Gebäude bzw. die Eckpunkte auch direkt verbunden sein, was hier nicht der Fall ist
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166063719
katpatuka (2025-08-31 07:59:12+00:00): Hello neverdance,

I guess something went wrong in this changeset (perhaps a power outage ?) because there are lots of unconnected nodes near 拉孜乡. I did not remove them since you seem to have started to add buildings...
neverdance (2025-09-09 14:08:53+00:00): Tks for your notice. An unexpected system crash caused these issues. I'll fix it.
DD1GJ (2025-05-11 21:45:33+00:00): Hallo Thomas07222 ,

wie soll man sonst zu Nummer 19 kommen?

Da zudem in Sandweier wohl unbeabsichtigt zwei Solaranlagen verschoben wwurden, habe ich alle Änderungen rückgängig gemacht.
Thomas07222 (2025-05-11 22:16:54+00:00): Es gibt zu 19 keine eingetragene Dienstbarkeit.