piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bucket848 (2025-05-04 19:12:37+00:00): This was a bit confusing for me yesterday
aTarom (2025-05-01 09:49:26+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, retiro los tags de importación gpx:..., y corrijo algunas geometrías visibles en la ortofoto conectando los extremos a las carreteras. Entiendo que se ha importado el track directamente y se ha subido por accidente, cualquier problema me dices, saludos
cezura (2025-05-01 14:51:54+00:00): Estoy poniendo al día por estar jubilado y  necesito aprender.
GRACIAS
jeslop (2025-04-30 20:43:30+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165651523
IvicaBanovac (2025-05-05 13:12:08+00:00): Reverted because of accidental node creation

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165845633
jeslop (2025-04-30 20:43:31+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165651523
StreetSurveyor (2025-06-20 22:37:09+00:00): Hi, this was also incorrect due to sidewalks/bike paths. They only time they really should be tagged as '...=no' is if there are restrictions or signs indicating ' no....access' for a given type.
SomeoneElse (2025-04-30 18:02:57+00:00): A web search right now (Google or DDG) only finds (a) OSM (b) SABRE and (c) other user-contributed data such as "Litter on slip road verge. Ducker Holt Interchange, Marr, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, England, DN5 7AS, United Kingdom".
jeslop (2025-04-30 20:47:40+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165651634
jeslop (2025-04-30 20:47:41+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165651634
jeslop (2025-04-30 20:47:42+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165651634
jeslop (2025-04-30 20:47:43+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165651634
Baloo Uriza (2025-05-01 02:03:59+00:00): If the exit gate opens for anybody pulling up to it, it might be more permissive than private in that one direction.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165647535
Trevleonard (2025-05-01 02:11:24+00:00): Thanks for the reply

The gate does not open just by pulling up, only if you have an RFID chip. That is the problem, delivery vehicles get stuck here causing them to back out onto a busy street which is likely to cause a major accident, including death. 

The only way for guests or delivery vehicles to access Rose Creek is via N May Ave and Rose Creek Dr.
Baloo Uriza (2025-05-01 02:23:03+00:00): Including when leaving the subdivision on the southbound side?  That'd be a very unusual case.
Trevleonard (2025-05-01 02:26:54+00:00): I am so sorry, I completely misread this. You are absolutely correct, the exit gate is as you said, pull up and it opens for all cars.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-30 04:53:09+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166951670
Yury Yatsynovich (2025-08-15 18:05:16+00:00): Why did you convert all these paths into "abandoned"? Do you have local knowledge of this area?
George S (2025-08-16 18:48:22+00:00): Most of those "trails" are old logging roads and not officially maintained trails. They are usually a bit overgrown and difficult for casual user to follow.

G
user_5359 (2025-05-01 06:51:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add your address to the main building (and not to the street crosssing).
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-30 04:52:54+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166951664
Elizen (2025-05-06 08:18:49+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Почему вы удалили тег place=neighbourhood? Эти коттеджные посёлки и СНТ входят в границу посёлка Ленинское.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:place%3Dallotments
Greg91 (2025-06-22 14:52:22+00:00): This is a duplicate of already existing object on this place => please, revert this changeset
yelisey90 (2025-06-23 06:25:53+00:00): hmm, the other object lacks historic=memorial tag. So the two objects should be merged
Greg91 (2025-06-30 05:49:14+00:00): "Memorial" tag is always "historic" (from wiki), so I suppose it is optional/implied. Nevertheless, I have added it to the original object
yelisey90 (2025-06-30 09:29:34+00:00): "Memorial" tag is always "historic" (from wiki) — yes, but that's only because the only tag for mapping a memorial is "historic=memorial". The tag "memorial=obelisk" doesn't map anything by itself, it only specifies the type of a memorial; but "historic=memorial" still is required, otherwise the object won't be shown on maps (which is why added the present object in the first place — there wasn't anything showing on the map).

Also, I suggest that you add "name:ru=Бойцам героической рабоче-крестьянской Красной армии" (and preferably in other languages also) to the older object so that it can be identified using those maps that do not process the inscription tag (most do not).
eggie (2025-04-30 19:17:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Tip... Geef bij je upload svp aan wat je precies hebt aangepast. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
ilias_ (2025-05-02 00:58:15+00:00): R+4 veut dire 5 levels, levels prend en compte le rez de chaussée aussi
eggie (2025-04-30 19:29:57+00:00): Nog een tip nutrv,

Tag direct bij op de bestaande adresnode.. Je krijg anders twee adressen in de database.
Ik heb de info samengevoegd. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-30 19:34:44+00:00): Oke....   Lastig te beoordelen als buitenstaander. Geldt hier ook een uitzondering voor bevoorrading zoals in het begin van de straat?
vehicle:conditional=delivery @ (Mo-Fr 08:00-12:00,18:00-21:00; Sa 08:00-10:00)

MVG
eggie
4004 (2025-05-05 00:22:30+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
кадастровую карту мы за источник не берем, а вот ваши слова как владельца очень даже. 
рядом дома с номером 13Б нет?
olo81 (2025-05-04 04:43:08+00:00): jak dodajesz bariery, pamiętaj o wszystkich typach pojazdów które mają dostęp 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/885450339/history
Kolejna sprawa, w opisie edycji brak informacji, że coś poza hydrantami ruszałeś.
zuicz (2025-07-07 20:23:42+00:00): To nie jest czasem alt konto c2oc4?
olo81 (2025-07-07 21:02:24+00:00): tak :D
balchen (2025-05-10 18:05:44+00:00): Hei. Hva er hensikten med https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834187607? Den ser ut til å også ha feil utstrekning.
gormur (2025-05-15 07:32:21+00:00): Bare at det fortsatt var litt arbeid som gjensto med påkoblingen når jeg "åpnet" veien. Og som påminning om å stikke innom etter en stund for å sjekke alle detaljer. Men om du mener alt er fint, så er det bare til å slette :)
balchen (2025-05-15 08:30:58+00:00): OK. Det pågår fremdeles arbeid på ridestien, så det er fremdeles maskiner og gjerder på stedet. Men det pågår jo ikke arbeid på Sykkelstamveien, slik det arealet antyder. Likevel, jeg var mest nysgjerrig. Tror ikke noen bruker dette til noe :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 12:31:06+00:00): Hello!

You used
surface=asphalt_d
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/754190540/history

Have you maybe meant
surface=asphalt
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
eggie (2025-04-30 20:28:22+00:00): Dag nutrv  Lijkt me oke.  Ik heb wel de weg uitgesneden uit de landuse. 

MVG
eggie
tiptracks (2025-05-05 13:57:45+00:00): Dit lijkt mij eerlijk gezegd niet oke. Ik heb deze weg onlangs verwijderd omdat het gebied is ingericht als natuurgebied en inmiddels onder water staat. Wegfunctie is opgeheven

Check visualisatie https://hunze.drenthe.nl/publish/pages/138568/aerial_visualisatie_variant_2_003_1.jpg
eggie (2025-05-05 14:14:50+00:00): Ahhh .. duidelijk..
Ik pas het zo even aan. 
Mapper nutrv heeft overigens niet gereageerd

Groet,
eggie
eggie (2025-05-05 14:21:58+00:00): Weg verwijderd
eggie (2025-05-05 14:25:41+00:00): De situatie is als volgt nu
https://viewer.satellietdataportaal.nl/@53.10825,6.694493,16/?datastrip=20250328_PNEO-04
tiptracks (2025-05-05 14:36:31+00:00): Top Eggie!

Zoals vermeld in mijn change set zijn er nog meer wijzigingen te mappen als gevolgd van de herinrichting. Wellicht dat ik me daar binnenkort nog eens aan waag.
eggie (2025-05-05 14:39:29+00:00): Hoi  Even een beginnetje gemaakt bij die aansluiting van het meer tot de duiker.
Succes met de reconstructie.
Daar is wel heel veel veranderd.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-05-05 14:54:39+00:00): ... en dat water door het natte gebied ook maar ingetekend mvb het plan. De waterstand zal wel wisselen.
Het zal in ieder geval voorkomen dat de oude situatie weer ingetekend wordt.
Ze zijn nog volop bezig met die bruggen zie ik
user_5359 (2025-05-01 10:06:12+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12800997682. What is the mean of 
    1 = iwn wf via francigena
    2 = iwn greenway
?
notmyproblem1 (2025-05-01 14:53:51+00:00): Oh sorry user_5359, it was a node that I made for re-creating the roundabout, As this comment is published, That node does not more exist, Thanks soo much.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165680079
eggie (2025-04-30 20:20:41+00:00): Tip...   Geen adressen aanmaken in OSM. Gebruik de bestaande adresnodes om op bij te taggen.

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-30 20:11:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/900424415

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Britzz (2025-08-11 07:51:10+00:00): Bonjour,
dans ce changeset vous avez transformé le café "Le Lutèce" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10011608959) en "Braun notes" alors que celui-ci se trouve en fait un pâté de maison plus bas : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10026947125.
Ceci juste pour information, j'ai corrigé suite à la note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4897976
UrbanRoaming (2025-08-29 06:29:01+00:00): Merci pour la correction ! Désolé pour cela.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-30 20:41:14+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12801078052

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Anas masuris (2025-05-03 17:39:09+00:00): Przystanek Międzyborów jest dawno oznaczony (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2189093926). Jeśli chciałeś oznaczyć budynek dworca, to od tego jest `building=train_station`. Nie dodaje się tego jako węzeł

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_Poland#Dworzec_kolejowy
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:building%3Dtrain_station
NieWnen (2025-05-05 19:10:24+00:00): Parkingi, boiska czy place zabaw również nie powinny być duplikowane.
Powyższe poprawiłem.
Glassman (2025-05-02 02:36:52+00:00): The two nodes in Seattle almost look the same. You could just add both shop and gallery to one tag. It would also help your SEO score to add your website.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165651593
aceman444 (2025-05-17 12:38:02+00:00): Na parkoviska v domoch tiez prosim pridavajte povolenia pristupu (asi access=private) a tiez typ parkoviska, napr. parking=underground (ak je podzemne). Predpokladam, ze tie udaje viete, ked pisete source=local knowledge.
Dominik Hulla (2025-05-17 12:46:54+00:00): Opravené, ako aj ostatné spomenuté. Musím si asi ešte viac preštudovať informácie o OSM a ich možnostiach.
felipeeugenio (2025-04-30 21:42:47+00:00): Hola. Dejó calles intransitables (access=no) es por alguna reparación? cuánto durará?
No mapeamos este tipo de cosas en OSM, salvo que sea por años o muchos meses.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165652362
Cristian Olguin (2025-04-30 21:47:13+00:00): Días o algunas semanas debido a pavimentación.
felipeeugenio (2025-04-30 21:52:42+00:00): ok, gracias
aceman444 (2025-05-17 14:31:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12801148537 tiez prosim nedavajte na branu do sukromnej garaze amenity=parking_entrance, nie je to hromadne parkovisko (ci uz verejne alebo sukromne pre vsetkych vlastnikov bytovky).
aceman444 (2026-04-25 13:37:22+00:00): Adresa 822/3A uz je zadana na dome juznejsie, takze nebolo potrebne ju pridavat duplicitne na garaz.
riwnodennyk (2025-05-01 15:34:03+00:00): Hi! Road 1284485466 doesn't exist, it was removed since the construction of the office center
KKS (2025-05-01 16:36:29+00:00): Я вчора спустився по неіснуючій дорозі
riwnodennyk (2025-05-02 13:22:50+00:00): Це будівельний майданчик, там крутий схил, стежка там відсутня. Там ніхто не ходить
riwnodennyk (2025-05-02 13:23:49+00:00): Не будь-який спуск з пагорба це стежка. Тому не варто це позначати на ОСМ
riwnodennyk (2025-05-02 21:23:51+00:00): фото приєднується https://photos.app.goo.gl/ZQgUS2NS7yag51Ta7
KKS (2025-05-03 10:07:16+00:00): Нащо мені фото якщо я кажу шо я там спускався, а потім об'їздив все навколо. І те що ти поправив раніше, начебто його не існує, все існує як і було і я його знову поправлю, бо воно існує. Л-логіка.
riwnodennyk (2025-05-05 02:40:46+00:00): ні, цієї стежки не існує. будь ласка, видали. або я буду вимушений зарепортити вандалізм
KKS (2025-05-05 08:03:18+00:00): Ще раз повторюю, якщо її не існує то як я нею спускаюсь?
user_5359 (2025-05-01 10:43:26+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1267299432. What is the mean of the key gorge:name? Which language code did you mean?
quincylvania (2025-05-01 13:16:01+00:00): Hi, it's just the name of the gorge/canyon on this river section. It's in the local name (English). If there is a better tag for this then let me know.
user_5359 (2025-05-01 14:24:32+00:00): In the context of natural=gorge, I would probably have thought of it more quickly. Thanks for the explanation!
quincylvania (2025-05-01 14:52:04+00:00): Yeah, I added the `natural=gorge` POI here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1570341725
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
eggie (2025-04-30 21:54:34+00:00): commentaar moet zijn: aanvulling tagging resort
monhiko (2025-05-01 02:47:41+00:00): 你好！请问是新来的mapper吗？

学校内道路一般都属于为校内师生“服务”的道路，所以建议用“服务道路”而非“生活性道路”这样的标签来使用哦！

另外，绘图时请尽量参考附近（或省市区内）优秀地域案例，可以帮你绘图更加规范哦！ > _ <
GuGuan123 (2025-05-01 04:56:56+00:00): @monhiko 是的呢，我是第一次使用OpenStreetMap，感谢你的纠正！
请问已经提交的内容是否还能更改？我想修正我犯的错误 )
monhiko (2025-05-01 05:52:41+00:00): 啊！可以的哦！只要你再打开编辑界面后修改再上传就可以了！> _ <
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:57:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Tolhuis (2025-07-06 21:15:55+00:00): Hallo, ik zag dat je in deze changeset adressen van de de Koning Leopold III straat en de Luitenant Juul De Windestraat hebt geimporteerd, maar niet hebt aangepast naar de huidige straatnaam op osm. Voor het eerste geval lijkt de straatnaam fout (op het naambordje staat geen spatie voor straat), voor het tweede geval moeten de adressen aangepast worden. Op osm streven we ernaar geen afkortingen in de straatnaam te schrijven, en de adressen erop af te stemmen. Kan je deze nog aanpassen?
Groetjes, Jasper
djsa (2025-07-06 21:39:39+00:00): Ik heb momenteel geen toegang tot josm, maar breng het in orde asap.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:53:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Sylabowy Kot (2025-04-30 22:23:16+00:00): Wg http://mazowiecki.pzd.pl/gmina-piaseczno-przystapila-do-sporzadzania-planu-ogolnego-mozna-skladac-wnioski/ ROD "Nad Jeziorką 2" leży w Jazdarzewie. Nie ma co nad tym myśleć, jak i tak oba ogrody jawnie przegraczają granice dwóch miast.
MxxCon (2025-05-02 16:07:47+00:00): Hello.
Could you please provide some supporting information regarding these features? None of the available satellite imagery show these shapes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165653979
AtomicPancake (2025-05-06 17:56:46+00:00): These shapes are just at rough outlines of the training areas. Machines, pullup bars, dip bars and more are interspersed inside of the track.
MxxCon (2025-05-06 18:15:27+00:00): If you are not sure about the specific shape, it's probably better to map them as a node instead.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:55:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:54:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:58:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
silversurfer83 (2025-05-01 18:50:03+00:00): Hi :)

kleinen Hinweis hätte ich für dich für die Zukunft:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Vielen Dank und happy mapping
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165654668
user_18429762 (2025-05-01 18:57:44+00:00): Jo, merke ich mir fürs nächste mal 👍
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-01 08:48:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! thank you for your contribution. Please note:

The name should be the name only. No need to specify that it's a hairdresser, since this is already captured in the node type.

You can add names in other languages too, but use the proper tags, for example `name:ru` for Russian.

Please consider reading the guidelines in the Israel Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#The_basics
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-04 13:56:18+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165801594
ilias_ (2025-05-01 13:11:26+00:00): edits in Germany and the Canary Islands = big changeset, please separate them in the future
dcskobuffs (2025-05-09 21:41:14+00:00): Hello joshuarshah,
I would like to clarify that I unified the classification of route there because one lane (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1381015645) was already classified as a trunk and (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1381015646) was a long trunk_link which did not make sense.
I am hoping you could help me with a couple questions about this highway project. Would the Connector Road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1381015652) be better classified as a primary rather than a primary_link since it is the continuation of the route and does not seem to meet the definition of a ramp/link? Also, do you know the construction timeline or estimated opening dates for the longer-term completion Elmina Clarke Allen Highway sections that are currently set as construction ways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927941474 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927941476)?
Thank you and looking forward to hearing from you.
walkman_ua (2025-11-20 09:21:08+00:00): Hi LordMadsen, the building polygon already contains the address. Is there a particular reason to duplicate the address? The same applies to house number 1B (Hessenwinkler Straße)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 14:31:59+00:00): is it closer to shop=collector collector=toys ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%253Dcollector ) or shop=toys (actual toy shop, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtoys )
Nabema Collectibles (2025-05-02 15:02:03+00:00): Collectibles toys like funko pops, action figures. It also has Trading cards like pokemon. I think it would be collector=toys
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-04 06:16:15+00:00): changed it so
Bjoe77 (2025-08-26 11:20:27+00:00): Die Wege sind gesperrt! §4(2) Ferner ist es nach Art. 7 Abs. 3 BayNatSchG verboten: [...] das Gebiet außerhalb der befestigten
Wege zu betreten, ausgenommen durch
Grundeigentümer oder Nutzungsberechtigte. 
Alle offiziellen Wanderwege wurden verlegt bzw. entwidtmet. 
Grüße Björn Stumpf, Wegemanagement Frankenwaldverein e. V.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-30 04:52:51+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166951661
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-30 04:52:48+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166951658
CurlingMan13 (2025-05-08 03:19:03+00:00): The name should not be descriptive.  The name is only a name.  I encourage you to review:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#:~:text=apostrophe%2C%20one%20without.-,Name%20is%20the%20name%20only,-The%20names%20should

I have removed the name and instead added the address to the construction area.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-30 04:52:45+00:00): DWG revert - apparent undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166951656
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-01 01:30:36+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167032988
ika-chan! (2025-05-27 09:42:18+00:00): This changeset was undone because the classification did not reflect reality based on position of motorway signs at position 37.2590895,22.0049930

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166816310
MassCartog (2025-05-01 13:11:09+00:00): Hello welcome to OSM. Paths that exist on the ground should not be removed. Please read for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The correct way to handle this would be to tag the path access=private, and if there really is a fence cutting the path off, you could map the fence, and cut the trail off where it intersects.

You also removed part of the path that does not seem to be private property in south trail-network. I restored the way, let me know if you need a help making changes.

Removing data from OSM will not stop trespassing & vandals, and purposeful removal of features that do exist on the ground is itself considered vandalism here. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
MassCartog (2025-05-21 15:42:26+00:00): [no user response]
Sakari_N (2025-05-05 13:32:04+00:00): Hi,

I noticed you've added a lot of barrier=fence around buildings, but I'm a bit concerned of the correctness of these edits.

Some sections of the fence don't appear on the aerial imagery.

Additionally, most of the properties are now completely fenced around, leaving no gap for the driveway.