piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2024-05-13 01:45:03+00:00): Hi banarepu, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/way/1282087962
https://osm.org/way/945966459

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-13 05:50:17+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-12 05:55:08+00:00): This is not the place to map things that don't actually exist.  This changeset has been reverted in part or full.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151209737
Mingwei (2024-05-22 06:38:02+00:00): 🎉
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Vahidnoori (2024-05-16 05:43:45+00:00): الهیه صحیح است
silversurfer83 (2024-05-12 16:14:46+00:00): Hi :)

warum machst du bei "Erlaubter Zugang - Alle" den Wert auf "no"? (also access=no)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123564187
Damit ist dieser Weg, so wie du ihn getaggt hast, für ALLE gesperrt, außer Fußgänger, Radfahrer, Pferde sowie LKW für Forst und Landwirtschaft. 

Wie ich schon geschrieben hatte, ist es nicht so gut, die Werte alle explizit zu setzen, wenn dort keine Schilder stehen. Erstmal nur die Werte setzen, die explizit durch Schilder vorgegeben sind, und den Rest nicht festlegen. Speziell den sehr allgemeinen Wert "Alle" nur setzen, wenn es unbedingt nötig ist.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151210097
dathoschy (2024-05-12 18:59:24+00:00): Wie kommst Du da drauf das da keine Schilder stehen? Ich wohne da, ich kenne die Örtlichkeiten. Und da sind Schilder. Von daher hat das schon seine Richtigkeit, das im Wald kein anderer mit einem Fahrzeug etwas zu suchen hat, außer Forst- und landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr sowie Radfahrer, Reiter oder Wanderer.
dathoschy (2024-05-12 19:07:30+00:00): Auf einem forstwirtschaftlichen Weg, ob der asphaltiert ist oder nur befestigt, hat keiner, was mit einem motorisierten Fahrzeug etwas zu suchen, sofern er da nicht arbeiten muss oder Waldbesitzer ist. 

Ich mache das ja nicht, weil ich Langeweile habe, sondern weil es nun mal so gesetzlich korrekt ist.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-12 20:05:14+00:00): Schon in Ordnung :)

ich bezweifle nicht, dass das so ist, ich möchte nur, dass es auch passend in der Datenbank landet.

Daher klingt das von dir beschriebene so, als wäre eine einfaches "motor_vehicle=agricultural;forestry" sauberer. Es kommt ohne ein allgemeines access=no aus und lässt den Rest durch. Bei Pferden kann es sein, dass da nochmal explizit geguckt werden muss.

Gruß ins Sauerland
silversurfer83
狄惠貴 (2024-07-02 16:15:10+00:00): https://wayfarer.idv.tw/Taiwan/2024/0428/0428.htm
jimmygu0611 (2026-03-10 12:13:28+00:00): 你好，感谢你在重庆所做的编辑。但是，我注意到你的编辑有可以商榷之处。OSM中国大陆编者有一个共识：在中国大陆地区不使用highway=living_street（生活性街道）标签。这是由于欧美地区与我国的城市规划和聚落形态差别很大，因此，osm中的highway=living_street不一定适用于我国。虽然这并非osm地图明文的规定，也并非强制，但我建议您将所有的highway=living_street改为highway=service，祝编安。
MoistTangerine2 (2026-03-10 16:13:12+00:00): Thanks for your advice. I'll fix that later.
谢谢你的建议。我稍后会处理的。
borovac (2024-05-21 21:43:27+00:00): Hi kentact,

Could you please explain why you use the tag “destination:lang:sr” and other variants? When we look at the wiki page for that tag, we see that it is abandoned and not in use (see here).

I’m curious if you contacted the community before adding those characters en masse, as I don’t see any discussion about it anywhere. The official forum for OpenStreetMap in Serbia can be found here.

I kindly request that you start a topic related to this issue on the official channel. Until a consensus is reached regarding adding the “destination:lang:*” tag, I recommend temporarily stopping further additions. Otherwise, I will write a complaint to DWG regarding this matter.

These decisions should be made collectively within the community, rather than by an individual setting rules unilaterally.

I saw that you added to 2257 relations. I would like to ask you once again to stop adding until you have agreed and received approval from the OSM Serbia community.

All best borovac
mariotomo (2024-12-02 07:25:56+00:00): hi. it looks like you converted building:part(s) to building(s). this broke previous attempts to map complex buildings, and produced overlapping buildings. I might attempt to correct, or you may want to understand the situation and correct yourself, whoever makes it first. thanks for your cooperation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151210630
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:18:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:16:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:23:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:12:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
AndersAndersson (2024-05-12 19:49:51+00:00): Hej!
Det ska inte vara Dalvägen? Samma som den anslutande vägen.
haxpett (2024-05-12 20:32:11+00:00): Jo, det var jag som läste slarvigt i morse. Tack för att du har koll.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:20:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:22:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:24:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:13:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
NeisBot (2024-05-12 07:15:18+00:00): Hi recalificator, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/272613202

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-12 07:56:37+00:00): Hello recalificator,

OSM is used by many organisations for many purposes, it is not a toy. By making fake edits, you lower the quality of the map, meaning those who use it (including Niantic) are less likely to be able to update their data in the future.

Additionally, by the time Niantic does update their data, Wiglett will have most likely been featured in an event.

Rather than wasting everyone's time vandalising the map, I would suggest that instead you maybe take a trip out to this beach: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065956524 which should trigger the beach biome you're looking for.
ElliottPlack (2024-05-13 12:38:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 151265136 where the changeset comment is: Ticket#2024051310000288
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:14:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-12 09:19:22+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151215728
JeroenHoek (2024-05-12 18:18:52+00:00): Ja alles klar, danke. Ohne 'source=survey' wunderte ich mich über die Quelle dieses Changeset. Jetzt ist es deutlich.
literan (2024-05-13 20:29:30+00:00): не надо отрисовывать уже снесенные дома
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:11:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:24:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:17:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:19:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:21:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-01-03 11:15:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 160943337, 160943407, 160943366, 160943455 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some SC changes where user used Google Street View - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160701601
Margoulinot (2024-05-13 03:34:13+00:00): See discussion on changeset #140299705 which introduced the bug
silversurfer83 (2024-05-12 16:18:02+00:00): Gude :)

kurze Frage: Die "Postfiliale", die du hier hinzugefügt hast, wie genau sieht die aus? Gehört die zum Netto oder wer betreibt die?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151214412
bstaudinger (2024-05-12 17:46:04+00:00): Die Postfiliale ist ein eigener Betrieb in dem Gebäude, in dem sich der Netto befindet. Die Filiale hat auch noch Schreibwaren, ist aber über einen eigenen Zugang zu erreichen. Weiteres gibt es hier:
https://www.melaniedemmel.de/
silversurfer83 (2024-05-13 20:51:38+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung :)

Ich habe die Information genutzt, um die Daten zu verbessern.

Grüße
silversurfer83
VARVAR8 (2024-05-14 21:29:48+00:00): друже, а що це за дерево (1275748266) посеред будівлі, та ще й генератор? Навіщо тег дерева?
Zcor (2024-05-15 04:49:53+00:00): Тег ген  потрібно видалити
fgouget (2024-07-28 20:55:00+00:00): Bonjour,

D'après ce changeset il y a un trottoir devant le lycée Saint-Joseph : voir la partie Nord-Est de ce chemin :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/782951678

Mais dans le changeset #151694639 vous avez mis sur la rue Alexis Chopard qu'il n'y a pas de trottoir à cet endroit (sidewalk:right=no).

D'après les vues aériennes il ne semble effectivement pas y avoir de place entre les voitures garées en diagonale et le mur du lycée.

Avez-vous pu voir sur place s'il y avait un trottoir ? Est-il vraiment utilisable par des piétons ?

Cordialement,
NeisBot (2024-05-12 08:55:07+00:00): Hi recalificator, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/272613202

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-12 17:42:25+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151230397
ElliottPlack (2024-05-13 12:38:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 151265136 where the changeset comment is: Ticket#2024051310000288
NeisBot (2024-05-12 09:05:08+00:00): Hi adiron14, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/364816217

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-12 09:18:55+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151215707
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-12 09:10:29+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184911870

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dcapillae (2024-05-12 11:58:19+00:00): Buenas tardes.

¿Qué clase de monumento es? ¿Un obelisco? ¿Tiene alguna inscripción? Los monumentos conmemorativos se etiquetan como «historic=memorial». Encontrará más detalles en el wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
VladaC (2024-05-15 11:47:51+00:00): Dobrá práce - díky!
dcapillae (2024-05-12 11:55:19+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Gracias por los cambios. No se debe usar la clave «name» para añadir descripciones. Los objetos sin nombre no deben ser nombrados. Encontrará más detalles en el wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice.

El área de descanso queda bien definida etiquetada como «highway=rest_area».

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
toyotagps (2024-05-22 03:43:39+00:00): Объясните почему дороги физически не разделенные на проезжие части стали разделенными на карте?
Давайте придерживаться правил OSM, а не уподобляться яндекскартам.
Почитайте...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%94%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8#%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B6%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8
Sylabowy Kot (2025-09-26 17:19:57+00:00): Ale co to jest? Zakładać konto dla dodania hotelu i kasować po chwili znacznik informujący, że to jest hotel, przez co zostaje kropka z nic niemówiącą nazwą? Skasowałem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172496227
NeisBot (2024-05-13 01:46:45+00:00): Hi eGrawlix, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature's:
https://osm.org/relation/17584732
https://osm.org/relation/17584732

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-13 05:49:55+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
eGrawlix (2024-05-13 20:45:00+00:00): Hotel Beach is the official public beach area of White Bear Lake Resort. It appears on their maps of the area. There isn't anything geographically unusual about it. It may have additional sand added from other areas to maintain the beach as the lake level changes so I guess it is partially man_made

Source: I've been visiting the White Bear Lake area (and Kenosee Lake) for over 20 years. Used Bing images for the placement.
Langlaeufer (2024-05-15 14:30:18+00:00): Hallo Joachim,
Gravel meint im OSM-Kontext groben Schotter. Trifft das hier zu? Meistens sind die Wege als "compacted" (verdichtetes Gemisch aus groben und feinen Materialien) einzuordnen.

Zudem dürfte der Tracktype=grade5 bei einer Befestigung nicht mehr zutreffen. Jetzt vermutlich grade2/3 je nach grade des Ausbaus.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype

Grüße und frohes Mappen. Langläufer