piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Protoxenus (2024-05-15 08:46:26+00:00): Doch, ich habe etwas gewonnen. Es wurde wieder mal "nachgesehen", was ohne das Entfernen des =no nicht passiert wäre.
BTW: Benutze mal eine Suchmaschine und suche mal nach Bier und vegan. Und dann überlege mal dein Statement dazu.
Gruß Protoxenus
Shandhivya (2024-05-16 07:55:06+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. OMGURU
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151321240
riiga (2024-05-16 06:07:34+00:00): Hej och välkommen till OSM!

En fråga angående din ändring:
När du skriver att vägskyltar ännu inte har satts upp, vet du om det är på gång inom kort?

Grundregeln i OSM är nämligen "map what's on the ground", så om det inte finns någon vägskylt som förbjuder genomfartstrafik så bör inte vägen vara taggad som sådan heller.
eggie (2024-05-14 17:55:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Kijk even hier hoe een officetag gebruikt wordt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151322466
Spelfout headquarter? 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
emersonveenstra (2024-05-16 12:08:17+00:00): Hi there,

For https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11904676625, you said it's "A public fire place" but you added access=private. was that intentional?
sejohnson (2024-05-14 17:13:06+00:00): Nice job squaring those buildings. Keep up the good work.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151322606
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-14 17:10:28+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11302374722
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282925986

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fraxi (2024-05-14 21:49:32+00:00): Also used Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta
CasperGeo (2024-07-17 08:34:25+00:00): hi Fatsug, please square buildings (press Q) (see instruction videos) and try to identify more individual buildings in the area
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151323525
eggie (2024-05-14 19:38:47+00:00): Hoi,

Eigenlijk alleen maar dit
A  High Cross is a standing cross made from stone found in Ireland and Great Britain.
en
During the Celtic Revival of the 19th century, their shape was imitated for grave markers and since then also for memorials. However, these should not be mapped with historic=high_cross, but as historic=memorial. 

Denk dus op het continent  historic=memorial
met memorial=cross

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-14 19:42:24+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial

en
als leesvoer mocht je nog op de Britse eilanden komen en/of Ierland
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dhigh_cross
Op'tRad (2024-05-14 21:03:48+00:00): Dank Eggie, het is aangepast - ik moet de link's nog ontdekken..
Ik dacht ook prompt aan het Schwedenkreuz langs de Nürburgring Nordschleife - kort voor 'Aremberg', de scherpe bocht, het meest westelijke punt van de Nordschleife. Ik stelde al vast dat de tags ervan niet compleet zijn - en er is ook geen enkele description. Meer werk dus - voor morgen. Groet,
Werner
eggie (2024-05-15 04:18:00+00:00): 👍
NeisBot (2024-05-14 17:35:05+00:00): Hi Patty012, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1282934832

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:16:03+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151331202
Supaplex (2024-05-29 03:54:27+00:00): Revert due to it is a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151969677
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-14 20:35:32+00:00): Hello Patty,
Please do not make fictional changes to the map.
Kamil Kalata (2024-05-14 18:04:04+00:00): Ortofotomapa czasowa użyta w tym zestawie zmian składała się ze zdjęć aktualnych w dniu 3 października 2022 roku.
CasperGeo (2024-06-11 10:53:19+00:00): Hi Tilda. Decent job at identifying individual buildings, but make sure to square buildings (press q) to improve their alignment.
Keep it up
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151325399
EllenSomething (2024-05-14 18:17:52+00:00): Gut
Jakuje (2026-02-04 11:26:47+00:00): Znacit kazde parkovaci misto jako "amenity=parking" je spatne. Jednotliva mista je mozne znacit jako "amenity=parking_space", pokud jsme schopni zjistit jejich presnou geometrii:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space
eggie (2024-05-14 20:18:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2024-05-15 22:18:58+00:00): Op de Gasselterstraat bij stadskanaal heb je oneway=ye toegevoegd.
Ik neem aan dat dat niet de bedoeling was. Ik pas het even aan.
dvdhoven (2024-05-16 06:45:49+00:00): Bedankt Leo,

Was inderdaad niet de bedoeling.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Shandhivya (2024-05-16 06:24:40+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comments. Keep up the mapping - many thanks! #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151327147
Hobgoblin (2024-05-16 09:45:53+00:00): Thanks for the kind message!  I like to do some mapping when I am on holiday in a new place.  I have also uploaded a few series of photos to Mapillary for anyone else to use when mapping the area.
eggie (2024-05-14 19:08:32+00:00): 
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Coen Holten (2024-05-14 20:13:05+00:00): Dank je wel  Eggie :)
Ik werk veel aan Mobilizon. Ook FOSS. Dus ik weet niet of ik hier veel ga bijdragen, Maar goed om te weten dat het nu kan.
Metzor (2024-05-14 20:20:48+00:00): Hi AwayTeam

A friendly reminder to a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Please also have a look at this page as you use StreetComplete:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F
MunichWays (2024-06-12 06:37:40+00:00): sorry für die späte Antwort, OSM Mails waren im Spam gelandet.
Das Löschen des Namens war sicher ein versehen. Danke für die Korrektur.
Auf dem neuen Platenenplatz habe ich Samstag erst ene Pause gemacht und hab auch Fotos. das schaue ich mir nochmal genauer an.
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-15 02:58:09+00:00): When mapping areas, do not partially overlap areas (golf greens and fairways).  I have gone through and fixed this for you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151328028
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 15:18:10+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11905023446/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
totera (2024-05-15 05:08:07+00:00): Ciao Maloss34, se la fontanella è non funzionante ma ancora presente non va eliminata, ma taggata disused:amenity=drinking_water
Maloss34 (2024-05-15 05:33:56+00:00): le fontanelle in questione sono state dismesse dall'Amm.ne Comunale e non verranno riattivate. Lo so perchè lavoro al Comune di Ascoli e le abbiamo censite in occasione del 71° raduno nazionale bersaglieri. Peraltro il tag in questione, secondo istruzioni, indica che "Può essere utilizzato come metodo per contrassegnare fontane che richiedono piccole riparazioni, ad es. quelli senza acqua. Questa codifica potrebbe rimuoverli dalla maggior parte delle mappe". Ovvero sono state fisicamente dismesse e ad oggi non è stata espressa la volontà di riattivarle in futuro. Penso che sia corretto eliminarle ma fammi sapere
Maloss34 (2024-05-15 05:36:41+00:00): Ovvero non sono fontanelle che richiedono riparazioni e sono momentaneamente non utilizzabili.
Maloss34 (2024-05-15 07:28:00+00:00): Non esiste, mi sembra, un TAG per tali condizioni. Fammi sapere
Maloss34 (2024-05-15 07:43:00+00:00): La politica messa in atto dall'Amministrazione è quella di dismettere o eliminare la maggior parte delle fontanelle  per le seguenti motivazioni:
- risparmio idrico viste le criticità attuali (politica anche dell'ente gestore  CIIP)
- scarso utilizzo o utilizzo improprio (es. lavaggio mezzi)
- fontanelle poco visibili ed soggette ad atti di vandalismo 
- eccessivi oneri di mantenimento
Maloss34 (2024-05-15 11:39:24+00:00): Fammi sapere, ma penso sia corretto eliminarle in quanto prive di utilità anche futura
totera (2024-05-15 14:41:02+00:00): Ti ringrazio per le spiegazioni dettagliate. Data la situazione il tag più adatto è allora abandoned:amenity=drinking_water. Eliminarle del tutto non va bene perché seppure non hanno più la funzione originaria sono comunque ancora esistenti; aiuta inoltre a evitare che un nuovo mappatore vedendo l'elemento del tutto assente dalla mappa sia tentato di reinserirlo come fontanella funzionante.
Alcune di queste inoltre (penso a quelle di Rua Lunga e Via delle Terme) hanno anche una valenza storico-artistica che andrebbe segnalata (direi con historic=yes).
Se mi confermi che le cinque sono tutte ancora al loro posto le ripristino io mantenendo lo storico degli elementi OSM.
Maloss34 (2024-05-15 20:41:54+00:00): Fai come vuoi ma ho dei dubbi su abandoned:amenity=drinking_water  in quanto non  sono "fontane che richiedono riparazioni costose" ovvero sono fontane che non  verranno ripristinate. Detto ciò quella in via tornasacco è stata fisicamente rimossa. Quella su via delle Terme è storicizzata, così come tanti altri elementi urbani, ma non ha valenza artistica. L'esistenza di fontanelle dismesse può creare confusione in programmi di navigazione che non filtrano i dati utilizzando i tag... comunque è sempre un piacere confrontarsi... su rua lunga ti dico
ivanbranco (2024-05-15 21:31:44+00:00): +1 per totera, la penso come lui, per quanto non verranno mai ripristinate secondo me é giusto mapparle con i prefissi del caso

>>  L'esistenza di fontanelle dismesse può creare confusione in programmi di navigazione che non filtrano i dati utilizzando i tag

riesci a fare un esempio?
Maloss34 (2024-05-16 06:58:52+00:00): E' un'opinione e come tale va rispettata, anche perchè avete più esperienza di me, ma non esiste una precisa istruzione OSM. Infatti tag in questione rimandano ad una, se pur residuale, potenzialità di utilizzo e quindi interesse.  Se non erro Komoot, che è uno dei programmi più utilizzati da ciclisti ed escursionisti, riporta le fontanelle mappate senza distinzione (peraltro può essere utilizzata la stessa mappa OSM per pianificare i percorsi). In tale ambito evidenzio che spesso i tour vengono pianificati anche in funzione delle fontanelle vista la difficoltà di trasportare acqua oltre 1 L (idem per escursionisti). Inserire fontanelle che con certezza non verranno mai riattivate, per precisa volontà dell'Ente proprietario, può essere forviante. Tranne quella delle terme le fontanelle non vengono fisicamente rimosse solo perchè la rimozione ha un costo è questa l'unica ragione della loro permanenza. Anche Wikiloc (altro navigatore molto diffuso) può essere utilizzato direttamente su mappa OSM.
ivanbranco (2024-05-16 09:19:51+00:00): >>Se non erro Komoot, che è uno dei programmi più utilizzati da ciclisti ed escursionisti, riporta le fontanelle mappate senza distinzione.

Ho controllato e Koomot non renderizza né disused:amenity=drinking_water né abandoned:amenity=drinking_water. 

>> Anche Wikiloc (altro navigatore molto diffuso) può essere utilizzato direttamente su mappa OSM.

Le fontanelle con prefissi disused e abandoned non sono renderizzati, quindi anche in questo caso non possono fuorviare l'utente.

In generale non penso esista un navigatore che mostri questi elementi.
Maloss34 (2024-05-16 09:42:12+00:00): fai un esempio
ivanbranco (2024-05-16 09:50:32+00:00): Questa fontanella ad esempio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9949361980

Non viene mostrata né su Komoot né su Wikiloc
Maloss34 (2024-05-16 10:26:39+00:00): si hai ragione ricordavo male.. rimane il fatto che le modifiche che si vogliono inserire non si "riferiscono  a funzionalità che sono cadute in grave rovina e che potrebbero essere rimesse in funzione solo con sforzi costosi."
totera (2024-05-19 10:12:49+00:00): Se guardi la descrizione del prefisso abandoned (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:*) vedrai che corrisponde al nostro caso:  
1) oggetti ancora visibili  
2) il loro aspetto riflette l'utilizzo passato  
3) un riutilizzo immediato non è previsto
Maloss34 (2024-05-20 06:45:47+00:00): Avevo già letto l'istruzione che riporta testualmente:  
"ILabbandonato:*=* Il prefisso del CICLO DI VITA  può essere aggiunto ai tag che si riferiscono a funzionalità che sono cadute in grave rovina E che POTREBBERO essere rimesse in FUNZIONE solo con sforzi costosi. TALI elementi avranno ancora una forma fisica che riflette il loro precedente utilizzo visibile nel paesaggio.
(per interpretazione logico letterale il secondo periodo della norma discende dal primo e non ha portata autonoma) 
Per le funzionalità che POTREBBERO essere riutilizzate senza sforzi di riparazione significativi, vedere il prefisso chiave dismesso:*=* invece. Utilizzo di abbandonato=* come tag semplice è sconsigliato in alcune situazioni (ad esempio abbandonato=SÌ+negozio=* ).
L'istruzione SEMBRA (ma non voglio difendere nessuna posizione) voler intendere ad elementi, per vari motivi, in disuso ma potenzialmente utilizzabili ovvero che POTREBBERO essere riattivate. Il caso delle fontanelle in questione è diverso poichè sono arrivate a "fine vita" , non verranno ripristinate, non avranno più nessuna funzione per precisa scelta dell'Ente proprietario e non vengono rimosse (tranne in quella delle terme) solo per ragioni economiche. Comunque lasco a voi la scelta  visto che l'istruzione non è chiara... Spero di andare in rua lunga e poi ti dico
Maloss34 (2024-05-20 12:54:23+00:00): Ricordavo bene in via Lunga non c'è nessuna fontana
Maloss34 (2024-05-20 12:57:24+00:00): Rua Lunga
totera (2024-05-21 17:09:33+00:00): Davvero? Sarà qualche anno che non passo più in Rua Lunga, ma la ricordo come una delle più caratteristiche del centro, collocata in un'ampia nicchia di un muro di cinta di fronte al "passetto" di Rua della Quaglia. Era stata anche restaurata. https://www.facebook.com/groups/112162472246497/posts/1685051498290912/ http://www.ilquotidiano.it/articoli/2006/09/16/61360/recuperata-lex-fontana-di-via-del-pozzetto
totera (2024-06-09 00:05:33+00:00): Ho finalmente avuto occasione di fare un sopralluogo: la fontana di Rua Lunga è tuttora presente sebbene dal rubinetto non esca acqua, così come quelle all'incrocio Via Pacifici Mazzoni/Lungocastellano e in Largo Caduti di Nassiriya. Quella di Via delle Terme non solo è presente ma è anche funzionante. Ho ripristinato di conseguenza i nodi eliminati.
Non ho controllato la situazione in Via Po.
NeisBot (2024-05-14 19:25:05+00:00): Hi oldman919, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1282987758

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:20:08+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151332542
eggie (2024-05-14 19:25:00+00:00): Dag shanthossi   Beter geen adressen op de gebouwomtrekken zetten. Er zijn al adresnodes. Nieuwe gebouwen kun je laten importeren op verzoek.
Forumdraadje BAG importverzoeken.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43
Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-14 19:26:03+00:00): Bij Waalstraat 91 heb je een stuk weg verwijderd en een hek ingetekend. Loopt de weg niet door hier?
Shanthos (2024-05-17 13:21:49+00:00): oh dat ging per ongeluk
eggie (2024-05-17 14:21:19+00:00): Hoi.. Het achterom heb ik weer aangesloten op de Waalstraat. Ik heb van het wegdeel een toegangsweg gemaakt. (service) 
Groet
eggie
Shanthos (2024-05-17 14:23:36+00:00): is goed
NeisBot (2024-05-14 19:25:06+00:00): Hi oldman919, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/698122279

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:14:57+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151332542
NeisBot (2024-05-14 19:25:06+00:00): Hi oldman919, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1282987815

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:14:29+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151332597
NeisBot (2024-05-14 19:25:07+00:00): Hi oldman919, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1282989152

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:13:40+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151332700
NeisBot (2024-05-14 19:30:05+00:00): Hi oldman919, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/544807395

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:12:35+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151332470
NeisBot (2024-05-14 19:30:05+00:00): Hi oldman919, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/544804308

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:12:57+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151332470
NeisBot (2024-05-14 19:35:04+00:00): Hi oldman919, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/544869008

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-14 21:18:58+00:00): Hello oldman919,

You have been adding and also changing features so they are marked as beaches. In some of these cases, you have lowered the quality of the existing mapping and in others you have added incorrect data to the map.

These changes will need to be removed. Moving forward, please do not make changes such as this.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-15 05:11:59+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151332482
eggie (2024-05-14 20:19:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
BobSpoel (2024-05-15 13:57:45+00:00): Hoi Eggie, bedankt voor je welkomstbericht. Ik gebruik de app StreetComplete voor mijn bijdragen (de info op de welkomstwiki gaat vooral uit van bijdragen van achter de PC). Wanneer ik fouten maak hoor ik dat graag! 
Hartelijke groet, BobSpoel
aceman444 (2024-09-04 22:20:19+00:00): Zdravim, nezabudajte uvadzat zdroje. Na park obeti hraniciarov som nasiel VZN, ale tie dalsie neviem. Ak je to napisane na mieste, tak aspon 'survey'.
Taktiez uz teraz nesuhlasi novy nazov na wikidata,ktore je na objekte. Lebo jedno je park a druhe namestie, takze treba to rozlisit.
Filip009 (2024-05-18 17:55:11+00:00): Zdravím, čo chcete dosiahnuť týmto premenovaním hranice?
srbrook (2024-05-15 09:14:50+00:00): Looks good to me. highway=path is the correct highway tag to use if you can't get a vehicle down it. Another possible is footway. Paths can be named so that is not an issue.
Glassman (2024-05-15 18:35:15+00:00): To tag a swimming pool as private use the tags leisure=swimming_pool + access=private. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool for more info on tagging pools.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151330115