piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 21:59:29+00:00): Please do not delete items without providing a justification and explanation in the changeset comments.  This changeset is being reverted.
Baloo Uriza (2023-02-28 22:12:39+00:00): I think I successfully reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133148199
marczoutendijk (2023-03-01 01:30:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6909
JJIglesias (2023-03-01 04:22:54+00:00): Saludos. Para su informacion

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Imagery_Offset_Database
Tobias Seidel (2023-03-01 07:55:40+00:00): Did you read this before this edit? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war
SmartFinn (2023-03-01 08:14:56+00:00): Yes, we discussed it. The ban is strictly aimed at the front line and to a lesser extent concern the occupied part of the territory.
JJIglesias (2023-03-01 04:21:08+00:00): Saludos. Para su informacion

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mapeo_de_sill%C3%B3n
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-28 21:00:26+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10700342696
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150262381

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-05 07:30:14+00:00): amenity=toilet is for the feature tagging the toilet itself not whether a feature has one.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133146101
Alan Bragg (2023-03-06 01:02:23+00:00): I believe this is correctly tagged. It building is a typical forest service toilet. There is nothing else in the building.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-06 01:55:17+00:00): The tag is on the whole park
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-06 03:23:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325284266
Alan Bragg (2023-03-06 13:19:24+00:00): OK, deleted the tag. Thanks
DanGlover (2023-03-01 17:55:37+00:00): Hi Robbieonsea - this corresponds to the expected location of SP5 61 and is within SP5. Is this another where Royal Mail have the wrong reference on the box?
robbieonsea (2023-03-02 19:46:26+00:00): Oops. Typo in the postal code.
Fixed now.
webfil (2023-03-02 15:08:35+00:00): Bonjour. J'ai annulé votre modification parce qu'elle ne répond pas aux bonnes pratiques en matière d'attributs pour les routes québécoises ni au guide général d'attributs du wiki. En effet, elle n'est ni une route numérotée, ni une route entre deux place=town. Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Qu%C3%A9bec#Tagging_guidelines et https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway

Malheureusement, les attributs OpenStreetMap ne permettent pas une classification aussi fine que celle du ministère des Transports du Québec. Dans les zones rurales, la très forte majorité des routes non-numérotées sous la gouverne du ministère des Transports sont classifiées highway=tertiary (voir la cartographie de l'inventaire https://geoegl.msp.gouv.qc.ca/igo2/apercu-qc/?context=mtq&visiblelayers=bgr_v_sous_route_res_sup_act ). 

Dans ce cas-ci, la désignation de voie tertiaire n'a aucune incidence sur la création d'itinéraire car il s'agit tout de même du chemin le plus court entre Warwick et les grandes destinations (Drummondville, Trois-Rivières, etc.)
AV31 (2023-03-03 21:47:03+00:00): En 1993, le Ministère des Transports (MTQ) a remis la majorité des routes non numérotées (et même certaines routes numérotées) aux municipalités concernées. Ces routes sont plus ou moins bien entretenues. Il y a, pour la plupart, des interdictions de camionnage. La route entre Warwick et l'A-955 a été conservée par le MTQ. C'est pour cette raison que j'ai augmentée son importance par rapport aux routes locales environnantes. Il faudrait tenir compte de ce fait dans les bonnes pratiques. Je vous invite à regarder à cet adresse la carte officielle du Québec. Les routes en grises sont des routes locales appartenant aux municipalités. Les routes en couleur appartiennent au MTQ. 

https://www.quebec511.info/fr/carte_routiere/index.asp

En résumé, il faudrait idéalement dessiner les routes du MTQ de secondaire en montant et dessiner les routes locales en tertiaire et en descendant. Il faudrait que certains chemins locales soient vraiment importants pour les mettre plus haut que tertiaire. 
P.S. Pourrait-t'on enlever comme route principale le boul. Henri-Bourassa. C'est un beau cas qui ne répond pas "aux bonnes pratiques ...". Je la mettrais "tertiaire". Il y a beaucoup trop de "secondaire" à Montréal.
webfil (2023-03-04 02:56:12+00:00): Bonjour. Le boulevard Henri-Bourassa avec un highway=primary semble cadrer dans les bonnes pratiques pour les milieux urbains au Canada. Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway:International_equivalence
eggie (2023-03-01 11:36:28+00:00): Dag tOrte  Je vraagt feedback ..

De toegangsweg staat op private,, Dat zal voor dat hek vast ook wel gelden. 
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:01:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
JJIglesias (2023-03-01 04:08:27+00:00): Saludos. Para su informacion

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:kerb
NicoSa (2025-03-07 06:56:08+00:00): Die Wege über die Bahn hinweg (zur KGA Gartenfreunde Wuhlheide) existieren doch gar nicht. außerdem gibt es 15 ungelöste Probleme bei ihnen. Ich bitte um umgehende Korrektur bzw. Anpassung. Ansonsten werde ich die unsinnigen Weg löschen.
Fischkopp0815 (2025-03-07 07:56:49+00:00): Da hat Yannik leon einen Node verschoben.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162424682
Ich habe ihn zurückgeschoben
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163314495
elgolfo (2025-03-07 08:45:09+00:00): Hallo NicoSa,

worum geht es genau? Ich habe in diesem Changeset nur die unsinnigen bicycle=no Tags entfernt[1]. Wenn da irgendwas mit den Weggeometrien nicht hinhaut, am besten bei StefanHRT nachfragen, der scheint da der vorletzte Bearbeiter gewesen zu sein.

@Fischkopp0815 Danke für's Fixen, habe Yannik noch einen Kommentar mit dem Hinweis auf sein Malheur dagelassen.

Beste Grüße
Moritz

[1]: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133146589
NicoSa (2025-03-07 10:35:25+00:00): Danke Fischkopp0815. Wie du siehst elgolfo, hatte es nichts mit den Weggeometrien zu tuen. Danke auch an StefanHRT für dein Engagement. Macht ja keinen Sinn, wenn dort Radfahrer unerlaubt "langcrossen" und das Verhältnis zw. Radfahrer und Fußgänger weiter belasten.
Gruß
Nico
elgolfo (2025-03-07 18:21:00+00:00): Nico, auch wenn sich dein letzter Kommentar nicht ganz so liest, werte ich ihn wohlwollend als »Entschuldigung«, dass du mich bei deinem ersten Aufschlag hier unsubstantiell und passiv aggressiv anpöbeltest.
NicoSa (2025-03-07 19:58:44+00:00): Wenn du das auf dich beziehst, selbst schuld.
Gemeint war auf jeden Fall der Jenige, der den Punkt aus Versehen verschoben hatte. Wollte auf keinen Fall persönlich werden und das denke ich auch von dir.
Gruß
MxxCon (2023-03-01 04:04:39+00:00): Hello.
Rather than putting "disused" as this callbox's description you can use Lifecycle prefix as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
So this feature would become "disused:emergency=fire_alarm_box"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133146635
Osmwithspace (2025-02-19 18:39:32+00:00): Ist das tatsächlich ein Büro oder ist das ein Gruppenraum?
hdevine825 (2023-03-01 02:44:32+00:00): When adding features with square corners like basketball courts you can square the corners by pressing the Q key.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133146764
MxxCon (2023-03-01 04:06:59+00:00): Also please note that "handball" and "american_handball" are 2 separate sports...In NYC most outdoor courts where you smack a rubber ball against a cement wall are "american_handball".
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133146764
Glassman (2023-03-02 18:40:12+00:00): #TIP: building outlines should match the roof outline as best possible using aerial imagery
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133146790
VA00 (2023-03-13 10:08:20+00:00): Wcześniej było dobrze,
 zbiornik na ogół jest suchy.
multichill (2025-03-22 14:53:40+00:00): Je hebt dit op de duivenvereniging gezet op 1A. Die gymzaal zit zo te zien op nummer 15 als onderdeel van het Spaarne College.
WoodWoseWulf (2023-03-02 05:24:55+00:00): Hi, it looks like you duplicated trails here too.
Tammy Coppala (2023-03-02 14:14:33+00:00): I noticed that.  Here's the issue--i'm using gpx files from WV trail inventory--which is official WVdot info. I work with WV State Parks and need to update all our trails so that it syncs over to AllTrails.  Should I just have edited what was already there?  Because there are some errors in what is already showing.  Thanks for any info you can give me--i'm still learning all this.
Janitor Hanke (2023-03-03 12:39:29+00:00): Hi Tammy, generally best practice is to keep the history where possible and modify/update the existing ways. Of course, if there significant errors that might not be practical.
Tammy Coppala (2023-03-03 14:23:30+00:00): I see..Is there a way to completely undo my work so that I can go back and modify/update what was there before?  Or do i have to go back and delete all the points
Glassman (2023-03-02 18:41:02+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133146987
hdevine825 (2023-03-01 02:42:45+00:00): Looks good to me!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133147032
JJIglesias (2023-03-01 04:00:42+00:00): Saludos. Para su informacion.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dservice
joost schouppe (2023-05-02 15:45:50+00:00): Dit segment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122292961 is een fietsstraat. Ben je zeker dat het geen fietsstraat is? Of is de snelheid die je invoerde verkeerd?
Eebie (2023-05-02 19:47:49+00:00): 15 Augustusstraat (N77) in Zutendaal is nergens fietsstraat.  Er passeert ook geen toeristische fietsroute. Ik heb de tag fietsstraat gewist  voor het stuk waar die stond. Ik zal er morgen nog eens passeren en als er recent nog iets gewijzigd werd zal ik het aanpassen.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 22:31:17+00:00): Well, you clearly did a lot.  What did you change and why?

Here's a good guide you should look over:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,have%20edited%20on%20the%20map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133147254
CoyKoi (2023-03-01 07:02:03+00:00): Wiki suggests using place=locality when there's no feature to be tagged. I think in this case it makes sense to add this name to the landuse=retail around the shops. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116434887
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133147363
❤️‍🔥 (2025-07-28 10:30:09+00:00): done, to match the more common approach in NZ: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/28i6
eggie (2023-03-01 06:46:40+00:00): reverted by changeset #133158187
eggie (2023-03-01 06:55:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan. Wat was je bedoeling? Je hebt willekeurig over andere paden en wegen een nieuw pad getekend. Verder een aantal objecten getekend die al op de kaart aanwezig waren. 
Adresnodes die zijn geïmporteerd vanuit het kadaster beter niet aanpassen. Kortom.. Het lijkt meer op een 'vernieling' dan een nuttige bijdrage. 
Wanneer het de bedoeling was om een hardloop/wandelroute oid uit te zetten dan svp niet in de editor van OSM op deze manier. 
Je commentaar 'cxvmm'  maakt het allemaal niet duidelijker. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Osmwithspace (2024-11-06 09:07:05+00:00): Bitte beachte, wie Telefonnummern angegeben werden sollen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone

Am Beispiel Modellbahnwelt Fulda:
+49 661 2911222
eggie (2023-03-01 06:45:52+00:00): Reverted by changeset #133158170
eggie (2023-03-01 07:01:20+00:00): Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits.  
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
JJIglesias (2023-03-01 03:56:25+00:00): Saludos. Para su informacion

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:natural%3Dtree
Glassman (2023-03-02 18:42:17+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133147661
aixbrick (2023-03-01 11:21:35+00:00): Hallo,
ist das auch so vor Ort ausgeschildert? Grundsätzlich ist die von dir angebene Quelle nicht für OSM nutzbar ("Datenlizenz Deutschland – Namensnennung – Version 2.0", siehe https://kim.regioit.de/GIS/STAC/copyrights/copyrights.html).
Gruß
rs_mapping (2023-03-02 11:06:47+00:00): Werde ich in 2 Wochen kontrollieren können. Hab mich mit der Quelle vertan weil die basiskarte ja unter Zero verfügbar ist.
aixbrick (2023-03-21 16:48:56+00:00): Da sich hier nichts getan hat und auch aufgrund der unerlaubten Quelle habe ich den Namen nun gelöscht und die Straße auf hw=service geändert (für hw=residential ist die Bedeutung nicht groß genug): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133948660.
rs_mapping (2023-03-21 17:52:54+00:00): Ist mir beim Umzug entfallen zu antworten.
Leider lässt sich vor Ort kein Straßenname feststellen, da nicht beschildert.
Würde allerdings aus dem Sinn heraus dass die Einbahnstraße aus der Vaalser kommt den Namen nehmen. Habe bei einer kurzen Suche leider keine weitere Quelle gefunden.
hdevine825 (2023-03-01 02:33:58+00:00): Thank you for adding this ramp. All paths and roads in OSM should be interconnected, so there should be a path added to connect this ramp with other paths.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133147791
JJIglesias (2023-03-01 03:53:50+00:00): Saludos. Para su informacion

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:bridge
JJIglesias (2023-03-01 03:49:29+00:00): Saludos. Para su informacion:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Imagery_Offset_Database
JJIglesias (2023-03-01 03:47:40+00:00): Saludos: Para tu informacion:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:natural%3Dtree
eggie (2023-03-01 11:34:02+00:00): Hi .. I merged your info with the present addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
redd (2023-02-28 22:29:49+00:00): Thank You!
jimkats (2023-08-28 19:17:59+00:00): Απλώς σε ενημερώνω ότι διέγραψα την Δημοτική Ενότητα Θέρμου, αφού δεν υφίσταται στην πραγματικότητα, παρά μόνο σαν Ψευδοδημοτική Ενότητα από την ΕΛΣΤΑΤ για λόγους ομοιομορφίας δεδομένων. Δεν βρήκα κάποια πρόσφατη απόφαση που να την αναγνωρίζει επίσημα.
DrSpiros (2023-09-05 10:53:20+00:00): οποτε ειναι "ιδια" με την Κοινοτητα φανταζομαι, νομιζω οτι σε αυτη την περιοχη ηταν ολα φτιαγμενα ή απλα ενωνα τις κοινοτητες που ειχαν ηδη δημιουργηθει...
jimkats (2023-09-05 14:13:03+00:00): Εντός του Δήμου Θέρμου υπάρχουν πολλές κοινότητες, πέραν της Κοινότητας Θέρμου. Και δεν είναι δήμος που δημιουργήθηκε εκ νέου, αλλά ανέγγιχτος από τον Καλλικράτη δήμος, όπως ο Δήμος Νεμέας και ο Δήμος Βόρειας Κυνουρίας.
Allison P (2023-02-28 22:53:28+00:00): It would be good to review these buildings carefully instead of adding them blindly. For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150289618 is actually two buildings. The garage is separate, the roof just happens to overlap with the house's porch. And another example, though not in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150289947. This shape is totally wrong. It should be a simple rectangle, but here you've mapped it with a bit jutting out. A neighboring building, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150289647, is no better. You've mapped a detached garage as part of the house.

It is clear by the RapiD (pun intended) pace at which you're uploading these changesets that these buildings are not being properly reviewed, and thus this constitutes an undocumented import.
Guthrie (2023-02-28 23:26:07+00:00): I agree that some of the shapes Mapwithai surfaces are not ideal. I do edit ones that are innacurate but with many thousands of missing buidings in the area I'm bound to miss a few especailly when roof overlaps are not obvious. 

Thanks for your attention and I will continue to review with your comments in mind.
Allison P (2023-03-01 01:35:11+00:00): Oh dear, seems I copied the same link twice. The building I meant to link to in my third link was just to the west of the second one.

These are just the worst examples. There are plenty of buildings that are just not aligned, or have oversimplified shapes. Sometimes it is better to ignore the Bing building and do it by hand instead.
bdentremont (2023-03-06 00:30:04+00:00): This change moved the intersection for Southwest Broad Street and West Morganton Road significantly to the west, which I'm nearly certain was accidental.  I've moved it back.
BCNorwich (2023-03-02 08:18:50+00:00): Hi, ref bridleway Way: 1150292515, there is access to this PRoW therefore tagging access=no is incorrect, you should specify the traffic that has no access. I've removed the tag.

Regards Bernard.
twospeed (2023-03-02 09:21:22+00:00): Hi Bernard,

I’m not sure that is correct. According to OpenStreetMap Wiki access=no is correct  if general access is not allowed, but specific access, e.g. bicycle=yes, should be added if there is a specific right of way or access.

Regards,
JB - twospeed
BCNorwich (2023-03-02 09:48:02+00:00): Hi, But there is foot access. If public access by vehicles is excluded then vehicile=no. If it's a farm track then access=agricultural would exclude all other vehicles. Please remember that the wiki is not always right, in fact it's quite often wrong.

Regards Bernard.
twospeed (2023-03-02 10:01:03+00:00): Hi Bernard,
Perhaps the access status of a path can be defined in two ways: by access=no, meaning for all types, but then modified by classes to which this does not apply, i.e. those with access; or by access=yes, for all types, but then modified by classes to which this does not apply, i.e. those for whom access is not permitted.

I prefer the former.

Regards,
JB - twospeed
twospeed (2023-03-02 10:49:31+00:00): Hi Bernard,
The correct tagging of path access depends on the meaning of access=*. Is it access for all classes of user (my interpretation), or access for some classes of user (your interpretation). Without an unambiguous definition of the tag either of these interpretations could be correct.

Regards,

JB - twospeed
BCNorwich (2023-03-02 15:51:22+00:00): Hi, Access=no means there is no access at all except for the owner or operator of the land. These areas/ways are usually signed and/or have barriers indicating that there is no access at all. Entering any such areas/ways, unless you have express permission is trespass. The public do have a right of access to a PRoW even if it is on private land to which there is no other access right, thus such areas/ways cannot be access=no as there clearly is access by right to some form of traffic (foot on a public footpath).

Regards Bernard.
twospeed (2023-03-02 17:54:03+00:00): Hi Bernard,
I understand what you are saying, but I still think access=no might be overridden for particular classes of user. The examples given in OpenStreetMap Wiki seem to support this. For example in this entry:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Land-based_transportation

access=no, bus=yes - means that only buses are allowed to enter (for example a road only for buses and forbidden also to pedestrians) 

I know you said that entries in the Wiki might be wrong, but there are numerous entries agreeing. In the access table for a path or track the first entry is “All”: setting this to no generates a tag access=no. I think the important word here is “all”: if only certain classes of user have right of access then access all should not be yes. 

As I said in my last comment, I think this is a matter of interpretation.

Regards,

JB - twospeed
RicoElectrico (2023-03-01 14:44:33+00:00): Cześć, scaliłem duplikaty, bo teraz były 2 takie same sklepy w tym miejscu - jeden oznaczony jako punkt, a drugi jako obszar.
emvee (2026-07-05 20:23:15+00:00): Hoi,

Na deze changeset zie ik:

bicycle=destination
foot=yes
highway=footway
motor_vehicle=destination

Op de paden van Algemene Begraafplaats van Oud-Beijerland.

In het door jou gelinkt source (goed!) staat:

 Het is verboden op de begraafplaats rijwielen, bromfietsen, rij- of voertuigen, met uitzondering van gehandicaptenvoertuigen, mee te nemen, anders dan ter gelegenheid van een begrafenis of tot het vervoeren van materialen bestemd voor op de begraafplaats te verrichten werkzaamheden. In dat geval geldt een maximum snelheid van 10 km per uur. 

bicycle/motor_vehicle=destination lijken me dus onjuist.
Xyberion (2026-07-10 06:58:25+00:00): Hoi Emvee,

Welke tag zou jij hiervoor gebruiken?

Ik heb "Het is verboden, tenzij er sprake is van uitzondering x" geïnterpreteerd als "Er is alleen toegang met een aanwijsbare reden/bestemming, namelijk een begrafenis of vervoer van materialen naar een graf voor werkzaamheden."

Hoor graag van je hoe jij dit zou interpreteren.
Allison P (2023-03-01 06:13:11+00:00): It's preferred to map as building=detached, assuming these are single-family. It is more specific than building=house. Thanks for adding these!
BCNorwich (2023-03-02 08:24:09+00:00): Hi, I've removed part of Way: 1150294287 because it duplicated an existing highway. I've also corrected some of the tagging.

Regards Bernard.
twospeed (2023-03-02 09:36:44+00:00): Hi Bernard,
I think OpenStreetMaps has a slight problem with regard to UK PRoWs: they are treated in the same way as a physical feature, e.g. a track, when in fact they are legal constructs, not physical. For example a track can have legal status as e.g. a public bridleway, but still be a track, if that makes sense. There should be some way of overlaying the rights of way information on the map to indicate a physical feature’s legal access status. That is why I try to use the (formally unapproved) tag designation= to indicate a PRoW.

Regards,
JB - twospeed
BCNorwich (2023-03-02 09:50:31+00:00): Hi, You are correct and that is what I've done here. I removed the path section that was mapped on top of the track and transferred the PRoW tags to the section of the track.

Regards Bernard.
Note_Fixer (2023-03-01 12:11:30+00:00): old, disused o'hare impond.
The_JF (2024-08-28 19:46:50+00:00): who at LCC confirmed about the A58 being changed back from non-primary to primary route? I think the primary Leeds-Wetherby route is via A1(M) /M1. (M621/M62 for Halifax)
I don't know about A661 but no signs have changed in Harehills (black on white not green), I think the ELOR ones are incorrect.
There is also an 18t weight limit at Roundhay which would have to be removed to allow HGV access through the 'posh villages'
 the OS map shows this as red (not green) part from a short section in Leeds City centre and Sabre Wiki says non-primary status
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-01 02:38:31+00:00): Please square your buildings after drawing them.