piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-07-07 15:18:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mueschel (2026-07-28 10:03:09+00:00): Hi,
'traffic_sign:exemption is not used in other places. Isn't this something like OB108 "uitgezonderd bestemmingsverkeer"?  That could be tagged as 
traffic_sign=NL:C12,OB:108
eggie (2026-07-07 19:24:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-07-07 17:34:52+00:00): Hello,
Why did you move the "CO 340" ref from the slip lane to the main road? If traffic were to follow this route, they would turn right on that slip ramp to continue on CO 340.
Baconcrisp (2026-07-07 19:17:53+00:00): Ref tags aren't commonly used on *_link roads. The tag [destination:ref=*](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination:ref) is used instead, as it indicates where the link leads rather than what the link itself is.

CO 340 extends to the intersection and turns right because that is the main highway. A link (slip road) is just a [connection](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link#:~:text=the%20linking%20way%20is%20not%20the%20main%20line%20of%20either%20of%20the%20highways%20being%20linked%20but%20forms%20the%20connection%20between%20them) between two highways, not the main highway itself. I've reverted the tags to the previous version to keep it aligned with the wiki guidelines.
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-07-08 22:19:17+00:00): This is not how they're used in practice. This is because, in order to stay on the route, drivers have to use the slip lane. Links can have ref=* keys if they connect a route.

Also, later in the article you brought up, it says, "If they have refs it is usually where an overlap begins or ends, such as US 30 jumping onto I-80 for a concurrent section."
Baconcrisp (2026-07-09 14:25:21+00:00): I did miss that part. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I'll keep this in mind going forward.

I would like to point out though, that you made changes without first discussion those changes with the community and waiting for a decision which the DWG as well as other community members told you you have to do before making changes. I left your ref change on the link but fixed the classification since that doesn't change. The natural transition from primary to secondary happens at that intersection, not the link.

Please refrain from making any changes without first getting approval from the local community.

And thank you for pointing at that section on the article.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-20 21:28:52+00:00): As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality of your mapping and avoid consequences for your account and the features you map. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other mistagging for POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186084443
Apit Arsenal (2026-07-07 14:17:02+00:00): Sudah berhasil ditambahkan bangunan Masjid Raya Arrahim Balikpapan Regency
mavl (2026-07-10 14:43:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 185480597 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20921].
mavl (2026-07-10 14:43:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 185480597 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20921].
MassCartog (2026-07-07 14:59:34+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM, You don't need to remove the outline of the building unless the building has been demolished. You can just add the business node on top of the building. I think thats what you are trying to do. Thanks
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-07 16:37:34+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. See https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted series of changesets adding SEO POI and blatantly promotional description=* and other malformed tags to it, in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185279152
eggie (2026-07-07 19:24:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-07 19:23:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Cas8 (2026-07-07 19:53:26+00:00): Thanks!
Wildsharky (2026-07-09 05:35:52+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185382666
FajrAl (2026-07-07 15:11:14+00:00): rumah siapa?
CAM-Gerlach (2026-07-08 12:43:34+00:00): Thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185270694
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-07 16:38:22+00:00): SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more information.

Reverted re-adding SEO spam POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags/values in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/185279215
eggie (2026-07-07 15:17:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Duja (2026-07-08 12:07:58+00:00): Is there a reason you deleted like, 100 km2 of farmland polygons?
literan (2026-07-07 18:44:13+00:00): Бутырская - это название станции метро, а не входов (дверей). Не надо назначать имена дверям.
Руслан Т (2026-07-08 00:53:08+00:00): Привет! Спасибо, что подметил. Уже списались в личке по поводу отката имени.
silversurfer83 (2026-07-07 15:35:11+00:00): Hi there :)

playground:theme=playground may seem like it's unnessesary but it serves a purpose and should not be deleted. Please undo these edits. Thank you.

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185271942
duudel (2026-07-07 15:46:50+00:00): Hey, thanks for your comment. 

I am sorry if this edit was wrong and I will undo it immediately.

My reasoning was the following:

The built-in editor of openstreetmap.org flagged this as an issue and consequently i removed it. 

Furthermore looking at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground:theme the theme being playground is not mentioned and does not make much sense by looking at the entry.

For learning purposes can you help me clarify?

Thanks
silversurfer83 (2026-07-07 16:06:24+00:00): thanks for the speedy reply.

I'll be glad to clarify.

the playground:theme=* offers insights into what the playground might look like. Setting it to "playground" tells us that a) somebody looked at it and b) it's the standard playground design prevalent in that area. So in my mind it does serve a purpose. (btw: we have a guideline at OSM saying "don't delete tags you don't understand or don't like)

for the flags of the built in editor: they are useful and the should warrant you having a look at what exactly the editor flagged. But it is very important to always closely inspect the solution(s) offered and, please don't get me wrong, it sometimes takes a bit of experience editing OSM to make the right decision here. It can be OK to simply ignore the flag.

If you are unsure about anything or simply wish to learn more you can always connect with other people of OSM either at c.osm.org or maybe a Signal group. People will be happy to help :)
duudel (2026-07-07 16:13:48+00:00): Thank you for the clarifications. I will take your advice into account for the future.
eggie (2026-07-07 15:15:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-07 15:17:00+00:00): De camping op de node heb ik verwijderd. Dat is dubbel. 

MVG
eggie
Willem Keizer (2026-07-07 15:23:34+00:00): Ok, maar waarom zag i khem dan niet op de OSM kaart?
eggie (2026-07-07 15:30:38+00:00): Hoi.. omdat je hem per abuis hebt aangemaakt op een hoekje van dat vlak rechts onder
Ook duurt de rendering even.
eggie (2026-07-07 15:31:59+00:00): Hier kun je het nog zien..
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=185272102#18/53.18246/6.99496
Willem Keizer (2026-07-07 22:09:50+00:00): Ok, ik had hem dubbel gemaakt? De eerste keer verdween de edit inderdaad. Dank voor de uitleg.
eggie (2026-07-07 19:22:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Константин Гам (2026-07-10 11:31:43+00:00): Пожалуйста не меняйте статусы дорог primary и trunk вопреки принятым соглашениям. Статусы расставлены уже давно и соответствуют всем нормам
iuvi (2026-07-10 14:43:33+00:00): Хорошо, не буду. Что касается снимков - это логически должность OSM\Mapbox\Esri поддерживать их актуальными хотя бы раз в год\пол-года, рисуем по тому что дают в iD
eggie (2026-07-07 19:22:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-07 19:21:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
martinst (2026-07-07 15:29:05+00:00): Way 729869196: layer=-1 macht wenig Sinn.
Trailguru100 (2026-07-07 15:43:13+00:00): Was meinst Du genau? Das Schild?
martinst (2026-07-07 17:18:12+00:00): Nein, nicht das Schild.
Das Tagging mit layer=-1 vom Pfad würde bedeuten dass er unterirdisch/unterhalb von etwas verläuft.
Trailguru100 (2026-07-08 06:22:45+00:00): merci, habs korrigiert, war ein Versehen
Wildsharky (2026-07-09 05:35:08+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185382477
eggie (2026-07-07 19:20:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Wereldkaart123 (2026-07-07 15:35:53+00:00): https://www.amersfoort.nl/nieuwe-hockeyvelden-en-clubgebouw-bovenduist
eggie (2026-07-07 19:20:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
ajmat (2026-07-09 05:28:11+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185385884
Wildsharky (2026-07-09 05:34:21+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185320293
silversurfer83 (2026-07-07 20:24:28+00:00): thanks
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185275784
ajmat (2026-07-08 09:40:02+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185328554
World_Winner (2026-07-09 05:17:52+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185385479
Wildsharky (2026-07-09 05:33:42+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185320081
eggie (2026-07-07 19:19:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-07 18:11:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-11 08:15:06+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20926
citrula (2026-07-07 20:29:48+00:00): Please don't add features that don't exist. If you feel like it is helpful to clarify that things have been removed that are still available on imagery, use a lifecycle prefix:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
db-ak (2026-07-07 16:54:32+00:00): Z jakiej okazji wywaliłes mi linie 1533252808
Ewidetnie jest tam przedept aby wjechać rowerem na CPR z Gajowej bo jakieś geniusze musiały dać przejście dla pieszych
db-ak (2026-07-07 16:56:07+00:00): i to samo z drugą linie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1533252809, mozna po niej zjechać na Gajową w kierunku wschodnim. A tak uwalasz routing
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2026-07-07 17:12:27+00:00): Dodam na przejściu tag dla rowerów, i dodam z powrotem link dla routingu na tym zniszczonym krawężniku. Dzięki.
db-ak (2026-07-07 17:23:18+00:00): Na przejściu teoretycznie nie, bo to jest właśnie jakosć infrasktruktury rowerowej popoznańskich gmin i po tym nie wypada dawać routingu. Dlatego dałem te ścieżki, które istnieją w terenie, dla osób bardziej terenowych.
Yog Sot (2026-07-08 00:08:57+00:00): poprawiłem to
confusedbuffalo (2026-07-12 14:39:13+00:00): Hi, unfortunately I had to remove the housenumber from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1060365717 as you had applied it to the whole terrace. I've now split it into individual houses though, so the numbers can be added for each one
____chris____ (2026-07-13 08:42:52+00:00): Thanks confusedbuffalo. My first time using StreetComplete so I didn't spot that issue. Appreciate you fixing it up!
Frans S (2026-07-08 12:35:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
In general, fair mapped. HoweverL

Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while selected.
(Drawing a rectangular freehand is never correct squared.)
Also, do not cluster adjacent buildings. 
Map them as individual buildings.
Best regards
trial (2026-07-09 16:31:50+00:00): ton https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13995737722, c'est https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11677230942, bien placé depuis que MapBox a corrigé sa boulette.
MassCartog (2026-07-07 17:52:31+00:00): Hey commenting on this changeset too:

Hey I think I figured it out, looks like you are using the "The National map Topographic map" layer in OSM to "update" these tracks.

These tracks on the The National Topo map are LESS ACCURATE then the existing trails in OSM!! Please stop updating them based on those tracks!!

Sometimes those maps were made a long time ago and not with the best data. More modern GPS traces have been done of these trails, and a lot of the time what exists in OSM is better data then those old topo maps!
map per (2026-07-13 17:28:35+00:00): Hello iSumeri,

I reverted  this change because this is clearly an island and not a water area.

Best regards
map per
iSumeri (2026-07-14 13:47:05+00:00): hello my friend, thank you for your input. actually i was struggling in changing water area. but today I finally find the line and i have changed it to (city). i would appreciate if you have a look on the change I made. thanks
map per (2026-07-14 16:24:05+00:00): But this is the outline of the island, it extends way beyond the city (see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20162382). The city is already mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/428339490

Please change the category back to island.
HellMap (2026-07-07 19:41:38+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your edits.

Please note that if roads have sidewalks already-mapped as separate ways, then you should specify in StreetComplete that they are mapped separately.
eggie (2026-07-07 18:10:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Kovoschiz (2026-07-09 09:13:12+00:00): This is 1, but at 2
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-07-09 21:29:31+00:00): Bạn đã làm hỏng lối đi trên cầu Vĩnh Tuy.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-07-09 21:30:10+00:00): Mong là khi tạo chỉnh sửa bạn hãy kiểm tra kỹ trước khi gửi.
Hung Tran 9x0 (2026-07-09 21:38:27+00:00): Bây giờ tôi đã sửa lại rồi nhé.
Yog Sot (2026-07-08 00:08:13+00:00): przywróciłem prawidłową wersję. 
Nie zrobiłes tej poprawki prawidłowo, zwłaszcza, że prowadziłeś pieszych prosto na jezdnię, a chodziło przecież o rowery
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2026-07-09 13:19:36+00:00): Sorki, robiłam to pospiesznie na telefonie 😅
eggie (2026-07-07 18:09:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
9_tab (2026-07-07 17:25:25+00:00): concerne: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5377394 pas l'autre.
phodgkin (2026-07-07 20:55:25+00:00): Are the trails on the Lowther Estate permissive bridleways? The mapping/information refers only to hiking and cycling:
https://lowthercastle.org/cycling-walking/estate-trails/
Pete Owens (2026-07-08 15:48:41+00:00): The guide told us that all the trails we had ridden that day were permissive bridleways - so we could come back any time and ride them free of charge. However, she might have been using the term loosely as it was in the context of an e-bike tour. Several of the trails depicted on the cycleway map are in fact public bridleways.
phodgkin (2026-07-09 17:19:58+00:00): Fine - if Lowther Estates think of them as permissive bridleways. The only information I could find was a response to "is riding allowed?" saying that some routes were unsuitable due to cattle grids. I don't think this applies to the ways changed.
Bienson (2026-07-08 08:19:54+00:00): Für Waldwege ist das "NRW DTM Hillshade" Bildmaterial die beste Quelle für genaue Verläufe.

Ein Weg sollte als highway=track getaggt sein, wenn er breit genug ist, ein zweispuriges Fahrzeug aufzunehmen. Falls schmaler, dann ist es ein highway=path.
Bloomenwease (2026-07-08 09:25:53+00:00): Danke! Hillshade ist ja großartig, das macht es deutlich einfacher. Ich habe in Change 185327944 einige kleine Änderungen gemacht und hoffe, dass das Tagging der Wege jetzt besser ist.
Makeena (2026-07-07 17:51:41+00:00): Sorry for this useless nonedit, my Vespucci ran into an issue where it was not possible anymore to bring this node to an unchanged state accepted as such by the app, so I had to just upload it to not have it in another changeset as an outlier.
lyctkel (2026-07-10 14:41:49+00:00): Hi FooBar80,
Weet je zeker dat het 
recycling:food_waste=yes
recycling:green_waste=yes
recycling:paper=yes
recycling:plastic=yes
is?
Ik heb hier alleen containers voor restafval en papier/karton gevonden.
Groet,
lyctkel
FooBar80 (2026-07-10 15:15:40+00:00): Welke tag heb ik nodig voor de default haagse 'alles' container?
lyctkel (2026-07-10 21:01:08+00:00): Hierover is een langere discussie gevoerd op het forum, zie https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/recycling-of-waste-disposal-bij-restafval/144509.
Uiteindelijk (10 juni) is de uitkomst bekend. Afhankelijk van het feit of de containers afzonderlijk staan of dat er meerdere bij elkaar staan, wordt er op verschillende manieren te werk gegaan.

Er is geen algemene oplossing voor het opslaan van alle containers in Den Haag, want er zijn hier twee beheerders, Avalex en de gemeente Den Haag. Je moet bij elke container goed kijken.

PS: Morgen ben ik op reis en kan ik pas zondag weer reageren.
felipeeugenio (2026-07-07 19:27:40+00:00): Hola. Los condominios no son barrios, no se agregan de la misma manera. Yo hago las corecciones. Saludos y gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185285437
felipeeugenio (2026-07-07 20:02:38+00:00): Otra duda que tenemos: ¿Las Poblaciones son conocidas por sus números? ¿O son solo los Pinares? Por lo menos en internet el gobierno regional habla de Los Pinares solamente. Saludos
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185285437
BrayanDíazA (2026-07-08 13:08:06+00:00): Las poblaciones son conocidas igual por sus números al igual que si fuera por letras, como lo es el caso de la Galilea, ya que estos son loteos independientes entre sí, no es como si fuesen etapas de un gran loteo como lo puede ser Bosques de Santa Clara. En la municipalidad se le podría haber otorgado incluso otro nombre a simplemente diferenciarla por un número. También ocurre lo mismo con el Algarrobo diferenciadas por números y compuesto cada loteo de viviendas o departamentos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185285437
felipeeugenio (2026-07-08 13:22:18+00:00): ok, están separados. Pero son villas y no condominios, entendemos. Porque los condominios se agregan de manera distinta.
Ojalá se pueda meter al chat, ya que tenemos algunos maperos de Rancagua en éste y conocen los lugares también.

saludos
BrayanDíazA (2026-07-08 13:28:26+00:00): Ya supe como agregar los condominios, lo tendré en consideración, para diferenciarlos de las villas.
Saludos cordiales.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185285437
felipeeugenio (2026-07-08 14:02:41+00:00): Ok, saludos y gracias por la actitud.
urk (2026-07-17 12:30:40+00:00): Hallo Schramme, ich verstehe hier weder deinen unzutreffenden changeset-Kommentar noch deinen Beweggrund, eine Ladestation zu verschieben, die so am vorherigen Standort (Kemmer Parkplatz) nicht existiert hat aber hier auf dem Edeka-Parkplatz ein paar hundert Meter weiter auch nicht. 
Das hier war mein vorheriger Kommentar: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96204039#map=7/52.923/8.618&layers=N
Schaust du dir die Dinge die du einträgst auch mal in der Realität an?
eggie (2026-07-07 19:26:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
LorenzoPesci (2026-07-08 08:52:54+00:00): il toponimo Località Le Capannacce non va sulla strada ma in un punto "place" che sulla mappa ancora non è stato inserito.
Sulle strade ci va il nome della via/strada, se esiste, non quello della località
samliedl (2026-07-08 18:17:25+00:00): Ciao Lorenzo, ma in realtà quella strada si chiama proprio così. A giro per la Toscana ci sono un sacco di strade di campagna che si chiamano "località tal dei tali" io son residente in una di queste, fai te.
samliedl (2026-07-08 18:19:57+00:00): Lì accanto c'è anche una via che si chiama "la Nave".
Frans S (2026-07-08 10:13:28+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she deliver high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (See attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings

A: Inaccurate mapping. 
C: Collected adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.


Explanation can be found in this document, which might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards, and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185286651
NieWnen (2026-07-07 18:57:41+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tego, że ten przystanek już nie istnieje?
Legras_TT (2026-07-09 01:12:16+00:00): Reverted in changeset/185378238
amosharper (2026-07-08 08:41:37+00:00): Sorry for large changeset BB. I did edit out the cairn addition from Go Map!! directly in the XML commit, but I guess it doesn't behave the way I expected to.
eggie (2026-07-07 19:27:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community