piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Danysan95 (2025-11-05 14:11:32+00:00): Usiamo lo stesso nodo per tutti e 4 visto che sono nella stessa colonna. Usiamo le stesse coordinate del nodo (normalmente non si può copiare coordinate da OSM a wd ma in questo caso le abbiamo rilevate e inserite noi quindi possiamo usarle a piacere)
Frans S (2023-02-13 17:56:36+00:00): Hello Vivian. I reviewed this task as well.
You mapped lots of buildings with nodes connected to each other. This means that the buildings have an common separation wall. We cannot see that on the imagery, so each building need to be mapped as a single building, and do not forget to square it when it is rectangular.
Also keep an eye on walled courtyards next to buildings. They are not a part of the building. 
please do not alter existing mappings.
The control system flagged quite a number of times indicating that you have changed existing mappings.
No major issues, but they need to be checked.
Best regards
Frans S (2023-02-13 18:00:00+00:00): btw. you ignored 7 warnings from the Issue triangle before you uploaded your mappings. You have tried to solve them. Mostly nodes of buildings connected to roads
Best regards
Frans S (2023-02-21 09:43:15+00:00): Hello Vivian. Don't you read these messages? I see no changes in the way you map.
Please improve your mapping skills.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132459055
Frans S (2023-02-15 10:36:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Your mappings are accurate enough, however, most buildings are not squared.
Each building need to be squared with the Q key when it is still selected.
Best regards and keep mapping
Tomas_J (2026-07-15 20:14:44+00:00): Ahoj, tu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1144459893) si dal duplicitne na cestu sidewalk=left. Chodnik si uz predtym v roku 2022 separatne zmapoval. Na ceste malo byt sidewalk:left=separate.
moonraver (2026-07-17 05:05:56+00:00): Ahoj, kludne oprav. Ja tagy sidewalk nepridávam k cestám. Bola to rozdelená cesta (patrila k nej aj tá čo pokračuje ďalej) a nejako mi to prisúdilo podľa histórie, že som ju robil prvý. Reálne sediwalk tagy pridával najpravdepodobnejšie Malin v 2010
Tomas_J (2026-07-17 05:54:48+00:00): Opravím.  Každopádne ak sa dodatočne kreslí samostatný chodník vedľa cesty , je potrebné skontrolovať aj tagy na ceste.
skquinn (2023-02-23 05:31:42+00:00): On what basis are you making this change?

It is already having a detrimental effect on routing as OsmAnd now prefers Tidwell Road/West Tidwell Road over the freeway on one of my most frequently taken trips.
Trevor_1 (2023-02-23 06:10:40+00:00): I noticed that the Houston area had very few primary roads, so I looked at the TxDot traffic counter to see which non-freeway roads had the most traffic and upgraded some of those, and also looked for ones that were spaced between motorways. But if it's messing up routing, feel free to revert it.
Trevor_1 (2023-02-23 23:24:17+00:00): Do you want me to change it back?
jb54osm (2023-02-14 11:52:56+00:00): Dag Jillis,

In de wintermaanden verdwijnt het stadion altijd even. Om in maart/april weer opgebouwd te worden. Zie https://www.beachstadium.com/nl/ en satellietdataportaal .
Jillis inactivE (2023-02-14 14:19:59+00:00): Ehm ok, maar dan is het roerend goed als het de helft van de tijd afwezig is, en moet het in een andere vorm in OSM staan?
jb54osm (2023-02-14 15:26:12+00:00): Tsja, zo diep zit ik niet in de OSM-regels. BAG heeft wel een vermelding van het adres en een aantal gebouwen, al dan niet slechts in grijs. Een vraagje op het forum?
Jillis inactivE (2023-02-14 16:59:11+00:00): Ik zie nu inderdaad nu in de BAG twee panden staan, maar die stonden niet (meer) in OSM dus die waren al verwijderd/overschreven. Ik zal er eens wat beter naar kijken.
Bedankt voor de info, ik denk dat ik wat te snel was.
Jillis inactivE (2023-02-14 19:37:15+00:00): Er staat in de BAG één pand (het oostelijke met het adres) in gebruik, maar dat is op dit moment niet aanwezig ... het andere BAG pand staat op bouwvergunning verleend.
Map what's on the ground: ik zet wel een verwijzing naar het sportterrein terug met indicatie dat het niet permanent is. De gebouwen echter en het adres niet. Ik neig er eerder naar om bij de gemeente een terugmelding te doen dat pand niet bestaat... maar in Den Haag doen ze dan vervolgens moeilijk over bewijsmateriaal.
jb54osm (2023-02-14 19:48:40+00:00): Sportterrein (met naam) terugzetten lijkt me goed idee. Tribunes e.d. zijn mogelijk toch elk jaar weer anders.
BAG Den Haag is voor mij een zwart gat. Je hoort niets meer, of een jaar later :-(
aachso (2023-03-14 17:13:44+00:00): Hallo Philipp, heißt das, dort wurde jetzt ein neues Verkehrsschild "Einbahnstraße" aufgestellt? Oder ist weiterhin nur das Einfahren von der Ringstraße aus in die Trierer Straße per Schild "Einfahrt Verboten" nicht erlaubt, wie es bisher der Fall war?

Falls es ein neues Schild gibt, sollte die Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12007212 gelöscht werden.

Falls nur das Einfahren verboten ist, aber kein Schild "Einbahnstraße" vorhanden ist, wäre oneway=yes nicht korrekt und das Verbot durch ebendiese Relation bereits eingetragen.

Gruß
Philipp_Sto (2023-03-15 08:05:36+00:00): Hallo, da muss ich ehrlich gesagt passen und mich entschuldigen, dass ich wahrscheinlich etwas voreilig war.
Zu meiner Änderung kam es, weil meine OSM-basierte Navigation (Android-App Magic Earth) mich die Ringstr hinunter schickte, um auf die Trierer Str. einzubiegen.
Aber das scheint mehr ein Problem der App zu sein als der OSM Daten.
Vermutlich "übersehen" eine relevante Anzahl Autofahrer das Verbotsschild einfach, so dass per behavioural routing es zu dieser Fehlnavigation kommt.
Fazit: Meine Änderung sollte aller Wahrscheinlichkeit nach rückgängig gemacht werden, da diese nicht den tatsächlichen Gegebenheiten entspricht.
aachso (2023-03-16 17:05:38+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung. Hab in https://osm.org/changeset/133757760 jetzt oneway=no und eine note gesetzt.

Falls du Fahrradrouting verwendet hast, lag es daran, dass ich die (falsche) Ausnahme für Radfahrer erst vor zwei Tagen entfernt habe. Andernfalls ist es wohl ein Fehler in der Anwendung. Da Magic Earth nicht open source ist und es offenbar auch keinen issue tracker gibt, lässt sich das nur schwer sagen. Probier mal Organic Maps oder OsmAnd :)
Frans S (2023-02-19 09:35:13+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
You mapped a number of oval objects as round without tagging it.
We are not sure that it is for human living, but can be tagged as a building. However, the for is a more oval building . Rectangular and on both short sides an extra node shifted a bit to the outside.
Best regards
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-02-06 03:27:51+00:00): Thank you.
SherbetS (2023-02-13 21:29:32+00:00): Hansat,

why have you made this motorway object? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1144471765

this is not a motorway, and is not in Turkey.
Note_Fixer (2023-03-01 13:29:21+00:00): finished pavement, work, closed.
Dodko (2023-02-13 09:08:26+00:00): Na lesnej ceste môžu štandardne chodiť chodci, bicykle, kone, preto nie je nutné pridávať značky.
bicycle=yes
foot=yes
horse=yes
Skôr je potrebné vyplniť tracktype
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:tracktype
yasslay (2023-02-12 20:27:34+00:00): A walk from Africa to Europe? Impressive.

Nonetheless:

- What's the source for residential areas like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1144475742? It isn't very clear from aerial imagery.
- Why is the boundary box so big? Surely this could've been done through smaller changesets. It is good practice to add objects within a close distance of one another in one changeset and objects within a close distance of one another in another changeset (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets). Also, this can fall under the definition of a mechanical changeset (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits).

Please provide an explanation for the above. It'll be greatly appreciated.

Kind regards,
yasslay
portishead_runner (2023-02-13 07:46:11+00:00): Hi Yassley,
My mistake with my comment of long walk. I mixed up my local edits with some additional edits I tried based upon one of the OSM video tutorials on adding residential areas where it uses Africa as an example.

If I have incorrectly used residential areas in these examples then my apologies. I'm happy to delete. I was planning to come back shortly to add more detail and felt that adding these areas would help me identify the areas quickly.
What would you suggest?
I will look more at the details of size of area as per your links.
Thanks as I'm definitely learning all the time.
P_R
Frans S (2023-02-14 15:06:53+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please do not duplicate highways.
Best regards
Frans S (2023-02-13 17:37:04+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not allways accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Rectangular buildings are often not squared.
You tagged a number of highways as' service"
Please read the wiki highways where and how you need to tag highways
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132460858
lenny32 (2023-02-13 07:37:51+00:00): Il me semble que "centale béton lafarge" n'est pas un bâtiment, donc "building=industrial" n'est pas approprié ; de plus, les noms du name devraient avoir une majuscule au début "Centale Béton Lafarge"
Tjuro_Global (2023-02-18 07:37:30+00:00): Hello,

I see that you have added some landuse=village_green. Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvillage_green
Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?

Greetings Tjuro
Frans S (2023-02-16 10:50:20+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark. You add the tag area=yes to buildings. Why ? This is not correct and are flagged as errors by OSM.
just building=yes. is sufficient.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132461566
Frans S (2023-02-16 10:57:12+00:00): Hello again.
You corrected the offset of many buildings here. Great job, however, many buildings were not squared properly, often by a previous mapper. Please square each building with the Q key .
Best regards
Wald-Läufer (2023-02-18 21:00:57+00:00): Hi!
thanks for validating my mappings!
Yes, with the buildings I know...
At the beginning I made it several without knowing...

I wasn't sure if I should square the buildings. In Germany yes, but there I'm not sure if all buildings are squared. It's a poor region...

Best regards
eggie (2023-02-12 21:08:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
feedback  Alle begin is moeilijk. access=no is bijna altijd fout in combinatie met andere accesstags. Ik heb het verwijderd. Wellicht bedoel je vehicle=no

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-12 21:10:00+00:00): Een overstaphek geef je aan op een node  met 
barrier=stile
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dstile
Groet
eggie
palmpje (2023-02-12 21:37:50+00:00): Hallo eggie, het is een dam met een nieuw hek. Je ziet hem ook niet op Google Maps satelliet.Maar er is een hek overstap. Het is eigenlijk geen pad maar een grasdijk. Met een wandelroute van Wandelnet eroverheen.
 Op het al bestaande pad liggen betonplaten. gr palmpje
eggie (2023-02-12 21:43:21+00:00): Oke.. om de dam te maken zul je het water moeten splitsen in twee vlakken. Probeer maar gewoon. Ik kijk morgen wel of het gelukt is.
Succes..
eggie
eggie (2023-02-12 21:45:21+00:00): En.. Wanneer het smal is dan path gebruiken.. is het breder dan highway=track..
vehicle=no had ik al toegevoegd ipv access=no
eggie (2023-02-12 21:12:58+00:00): Oke .. een track.. Dus breed genoeg voor landbouwvoertuigen.
Het zal niet mogen routeren voor regulier autoverkeer.  Wellicht daarom vehicle=no bijtaggen.. of motor_vehicle=private ? 
Wel bord staat er.
Het eerste deel van de track loopt door het water.
Is daar niet een brug?
bridge=yes met  layer=1 

Kijk je nog even?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-12 21:14:34+00:00): Een track heeft een tracktype=grade?
grade1 t/m 5
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:Map_Features:tracktype
eggie (2023-02-12 21:18:48+00:00): Tja.. de brug
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=12-02-2022&loc=52.48933%2C4.734445%2C19z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-01-17&acqid=20230117_110010_SV1-03&sensor=SuperView-1
archie (2023-02-13 07:59:50+00:00): You have, again, moved the coastline at the marina into wrong position (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132461771). 
Would someone other than me tell this user to stop inserting offsets into osm, thanks.
Msiipola (2023-02-13 13:26:03+00:00): The coastline is wrong south of parking "Asplunds badplats".
Also road "Boda strandväg" has wrong geometry and don't follow the road in layer "Trafikverket Road Network".
Msiipola (2023-02-13 13:34:14+00:00): Please stop using Bing Maps in Sweden. They are the worst image reference here. Inaccurate and outdated. Instead use for example ESRI, which gives a more correct view of this area.
Msiipola (2023-02-13 13:52:02+00:00): You must calibrate your images against layer Trafikverket Road Network.
BertMule (2024-06-09 08:32:12+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the advice.

Indeed I have been struggling with the parallax in Sweden. It took me some time to discover what was going on and how to deal with it.

I do not remember this particular case.
Does this have to be re-corrected by me?

I will have to see how to use the Trafikverket data.

Sorry for the late response.
I don't often get to these.
Msiipola (2024-06-09 09:36:53+00:00): You don't have to correct it, if don't want. Just remember to adjust the imagery with the Trafikverket layer
JassKurn (2023-02-13 16:21:55+00:00): Hi sec147. Can you give more details. whether there has been a recent change to sign. From my knowledge the highway signage, supported by the Traffic Order, were correctly mapped in OSM in that they allowed all uses of the road, but the road was for motor vehicles a "dead end" if travelling from east or west due to a short section being made "no motor vehicles". 

From looking at google maps (not a useable source)  a yellow sign is present at either end stating "access to school only". If these signs are the source of the change, I feel that change is wrong. The signs are not statutory traffic order signs that enforce rules on how to use the road. The information is also clearly wrong.

I'd suggest that yellow signs are added clutter to make more visible the fact the road in no longer a cut through rat run. 

If the yellow signs are what you're referring to, and is taken literally, then it applies to both sides of Hollow Lane, and to cyclists, and residents and visitors to approx 7 houses.
Frans S (2023-02-16 11:58:54+00:00): Hello.  Thanks for mapping on this project.
A short comment. When you add a bridge, add the layer=1 tag as well.
(you know you can add a preset on the toolbar? It includes the layer)
Best regards and keep mapping
ChillyDL (2023-02-14 20:03:16+00:00): Hello Raretrack,
I see you changed wikimedia_commons= from linking to a category to linking to a single file responding to a maproulette challenge. This puzzles me - the maproulette rightly states that linking to a category is one of the aims of the challenge. A single image shall only be chosen if there is no category available, see the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons
I am therefore re-instating the category.
Raretrack (2023-02-15 13:03:24+00:00): Thanks for your feedback. I wasn't sure  before about the priority between Category and Files, but now I am. I will follow this advice in future. Thanks again.
Fretoune (2023-02-12 21:07:13+00:00): I'm learning and I'm afraid I should have appended to the existing path (in the upper part) and instead, I have rebuilt the whole U-turn path… Sorry…
I'm not sure how I can correct this… If anybody can help me, I would appreciate. I really don't want to mess things up.
canfe (2023-02-13 05:56:39+00:00): Dal titolo del changeset sembrerebbe che tu abbia voluto mappare una casa privata.
Non è assolutamente permesso farlo.
Puoi però mappare l'edificio, il civico (che va sul portoncino di ingresso sulla strada) ed associare una eventuale attività tipo studio geometri, ma mai un indirizzo "personale".
Se hai dei dubbi chiedi pure.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132463136
Frans S (2023-02-14 18:12:30+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark. You tag buildings as building=yes, which is ok. but you added also a tag area=yes !? 
Why? A building is to be mapped just as  building=yes. 
Please keep that in mind.
I remove the area tags.
Best regards
Wald-Läufer (2023-02-14 18:22:24+00:00): Hi,
yes, I realized this yesterday...
I didn't changed the tag area=yes. Instead of this I just added a new tag with building=yes.
My fault! Thanks for this hint! :o)
The new mapping from yesterday should be ok.
Did you removed it already? If not, I can have a look at it!
Best regards
wernerhxxx (2023-02-28 16:17:06+00:00): Hallo CaptainFehlentscheidung,

du hast vor ca. 2 Wochen die K 90 zw. Waldbreitbach und Wüscheid auf der vollen Länge zur Baustelle gemacht. Baustelle und Vollsperrung ist nur im Ortsbereich von Wüscheid.

Die Straße ist bis Wüscheid vor 2 oder 3 Jahren mit einer neuen Fahrbahndecke versorgt worden, und auch jetzt noch befahrbar - auch wenn am Ortseingang Schluss ist. 

Grüße
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-13 00:51:51+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10652927799

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
habi (2023-02-13 10:53:29+00:00): Bitte - immer noch - wenns geht etwas kleinere Changesets machen :)
M!dgard (2025-01-01 15:18:22+00:00): Hi, please only add Wikipedia links in the native language of the area you're adding them to. In Flanders we speak Dutch. Thanks!
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2023-02-19 13:51:19+00:00): Hi Kiss_Karoly; could it be that you accidentally used "disused:amenity" instead of "amenity"? Or is the restaurant really closed?
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2023-02-19 13:51:47+00:00): I'm talking about this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10652974208
Kiss_Karoly (2023-02-19 21:41:16+00:00): Yes, the restaurant really closed. I visited.
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2023-02-19 21:48:46+00:00): Ok, thanks for the quick reply 🙂 Why did you add diet tags even though the place is closed?
Kiss_Karoly (2023-02-21 22:03:53+00:00): I don't write the answer in English :( This was the restautant: 
https://www.beol.hu/helyi-kozelet/2021/06/testi-lelki-egyensulyra-torekednek-a-kifozdevel-bekescsaban
tomhukins (2023-02-23 14:51:40+00:00): Thank you for adding this new drinking water point.

I think I read somewhere that it's only accessible during the ticket office opening hours, which makes since as you've mapped it inside the building.  I notice https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/949048580 doesn't currently have opening_hours tagged, which would be a useful addition.

Next time I'm at the station I'll try to find out the opening hours and tag them.
bradrh (2023-02-14 02:05:29+00:00): Please keep each changesets confined to a smaller area
eggie (2023-02-13 06:45:47+00:00): Dag Palmje.. Best lastig landuse en water.
Ik heb even geholpen. 
Wanneer je landuse op water tekent die je gewoon het water. Dat ligt in rendering boven. Dan zie je dus geen dam.
Het water heb ik even gesplitst in twee delen... zodat je de dam nu ziet.
De multipolygoons heb ik er weer afgehaald. Die zullen wel per abuis zijn ontstaan door je pogingen tot splitsen.
Je kunt evt het hek nog toevoegen als node verbonden met de weg. 
barrier=gate met vehicle=no foot=yes

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-13 00:51:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431225949
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431226367

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MarcoR (2023-02-13 07:37:01+00:00): Ciao, con questo gruppo di modifiche avevi modificato il ponte della ferrovia creando una situazione irreale; hai anche spostato un appostamento di caccia e un pilone GSM in aree dove probabilmente nemmeno ce ne sono.

Pensando a un errore involontario ho annullato questo gruppo di modifiche; se vuoi, puoi riprovare a modificare la mappa oppure anche commentare qua, non ti fare problemi :)

Grazie e buon mapping,
Marco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132465032
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-13 00:51:46+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8601538515
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10594639721
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10594639709
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10592100096
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10589810334
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10589822440
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653118855
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10621768187
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10621768184
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653119089
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653119088
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653119081
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653119060
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653118995
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653118994
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653118993
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653118992
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653118961
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613785073
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613785072
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613785071
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10613785070
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10594425296
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653118933
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653118932
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653118930
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653118888
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653086094
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653086093
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10586743060
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10586743056
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10588582001

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653086074
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653118811
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653118949
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653118985
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653119013
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10653119047

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-02-14 21:55:55+00:00): Der er ingen "to" eller "via" på restriktionen 14553950
flyingember (2023-02-12 23:25:16+00:00): This is reverting something which is not a cycle path.  This individual and another are being picky when it suits them and not when it suits them.

There's only THREE cycle paths in all or urban KC.  The rest must be removed or converted into trails per their standard

https://www.marc.org/regional-trails-bikeways-map
sannkc (2023-02-13 00:28:40+00:00): Please recheck your source.  MARC designates these as shared-use paths, which it defines on the cited webpage as: "A multi-use trail intended exclusively for non-motorized users, including pedestrians and cyclists."
sannkc (2023-02-13 00:38:56+00:00): I see from another comment that you have a different interpretation of this definition than I do in relation to OSM's tagging practices.  I'll pose this question on Slack and see what others think.  Feel free to join the discussion and share your views.