piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ian Wolfe (2026-02-14 14:39:31+00:00): changing these to nodes since the larger building already exists
martinst (2024-04-04 02:13:54+00:00): Der Eintrag sieht korrekt aus.
Wieso hast du mtb:scale von Way 734691432 gelöscht?
taitetao (2024-04-04 18:51:35+00:00): Hi martinst,
 
super, dass du dich meldest! Danke für die Überprüfung!
Way 734691432  ist ein 3 Meter breiter Forstweg und daher überhaupt kein Singletrail. Die mtb:scale macht daher keinen Sinn. (Zumal S2 ohnehin total überbewertet gewesen wäre. Alternativ könnte man alle Forststraßen mit S0 bewerten, aber das wäre ja auch nicht Sinn der Sache! Deshalb habe ich die mtb:scale entfernt.)
 
Viele Grüße
martinst (2024-04-05 15:17:02+00:00): Danke für die Erklärung!
Langlaeufer (2024-04-03 18:38:23+00:00): Hallo OpenPepe.
Läuft der ganze Weg unter der Erde? Ich vermute mal eine Gebäudepassage? Diese am besten heraustrennen und tunnel=building_passage.
OpenPepe (2024-04-03 19:06:14+00:00): Hab's angepasst
Nakaner-repair (2024-04-03 13:51:59+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 142000371, 142002091, 149454355, 149454615.
DaveF (2024-04-04 09:22:36+00:00): The last I checked, that box was welded shut. Did you physically observe it or was it from Mapillary?
RaccoonFederation (2024-04-04 09:27:29+00:00): I'm adding postboxes from mapillary. I've changed this one to disused:amenity based on your feedback
citrula (2024-04-03 17:50:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. I removed the POI from the road way and added some additional details, you can review my edits here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149536884
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149527344
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-08 10:59:18+00:00): Hello!

Note that you do not need to add description of feature type as a name.
For example when mapping tree it is enough to specify that it is a tree, no need for putting that name of this specific tree is "Tree".

So for buildings it is not needed to put building as their name.

Or do you maybe know that this specific object mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268684205 is specifically named with such name?

And if it was mistake - can you edit map to remove this name?
    
Do not worry too much about this issue - I made way worse mistakes when I was starting. Maybe some tool or explanation is confusing? Why you added this name? Note that I am asking as maybe something can be fixed to be less confusing.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-08 10:59:59+00:00): Also - are you sure there is building there?

I see nothing on aerial...
mavl (2024-04-04 05:53:49+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, зачем вы удалили озеро и на его место добавили такое же озеро?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116884072/history  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1617332/history
Vladimir_Geroev (2024-04-04 13:04:12+00:00): Добрый день. Причина - более точная отрисовка контура озёр. Эти озера обрисовывались более десяти лет назад, тогда не было качественной съемки. Применяемые мною механизмы отрисовки гораздо точнее, однако корректировать чужую работу он не позволяет. Вы можете оценить качество оцифровки гидрографии по полуострову Канин Нос.
mavl (2024-04-04 13:33:35+00:00): Объекты удаляют, если они больше не существуют. Если объект существует, то его нужно редактировать, а не удалять и добавлять заново. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Vladimir_Geroev (2024-04-04 13:36:06+00:00): Понятно.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 12:33:15+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11783246042/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop?
risturiz (2025-03-31 18:24:23+00:00): Thanks for remembering :-) ... Fixed
karr4s (2026-04-06 08:41:55+00:00): SIRET erroné (31189095800169 au lieu de 31189095800136). C'est corrigé.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-04-07 07:02:27+00:00): Bonjour , merci pour votre vigilance et vos actions. Bonne journée
BG2ETV (2024-09-28 05:05:44+00:00): 您好，本编辑有误。
大板站为中国铁路运营，name=*标签应为“大板”，蒙语名称请填写在name:mo=*字段中。

Сайн байна уу, энэ засварлагчид алдаа гарлаа.
Дабан өртөөг Хятадын төмөр замын компани ажиллуулдаг бөгөөд "name=*" шошго нь "大板" байх ёстой.
"name:mo=*" талбарт монгол нэрийг бичнэ.

ᠰᠠᠶᠢᠨ ᠪᠠᠶᠢᠨ᠎ᠠ ᠤᠤ᠂ ᠡᠨᠡ ᠵᠠᠰᠠᠪᠤᠷᠢᠯᠠᠭᠴᠢᠳ ᠠᠯᠳᠠᠭ᠎ᠠ ᠭᠠᠷᠤᠯ᠎ᠠ᠃
ᠳᠠᠪᠠᠨ ᠥᠷᠲᠡᠭᠡ ᠶᠢ ᠬᠢᠲᠠᠳ ᠤᠨ ᠲᠡᠮᠦᠷ ᠵᠠᠮ ᠤᠨ ᠺᠣᠮᠫᠠᠨᠢ ᠠᠵᠢᠯᠯᠠᠭᠤᠯᠳᠠᠭ ᠪᠥᠭᠡᠳ 《name=‍*》 ᠱᠣᠰᠢᠭ᠎ᠠ ᠨᠢ 《大板》 ᠪᠠᠶᠢᠬᠤ ᠶᠣᠰᠣᠲᠠᠢ᠃
《name:mo=‍*》 ᠲᠠᠯᠠᠪᠤᠷ ᠲᠤ ᠮᠣᠩᠭᠣᠯ ᠨᠡᠷ᠎ᠡ ᠶᠢ ᠪᠢᠴᠢᠨ᠎ᠡ᠃

（Machine Translation, Please Refer to Chinese Text.）
SomeoneElse2 (2024-04-10 08:59:46+00:00): I don't think that "shop=mobility" is correct here.  That'd be a place where you _buy_ mobility scooters.  Shopmobility places tend to be tagged differently, see https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L8068 .
CjMalone (2024-04-10 09:10:02+00:00): I thought amenity=shopmobility was a copy paste error. There is currently 0 cases in OSM, feel free to move back to it, or something more usable. I have no local knowledge of this so don't know if it sells things.
BCNorwich (2024-04-04 06:44:27+00:00): Duplicated section of highway, Way: 149206440, removed.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-03 15:00:29+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249274248

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2024-04-03 16:20:41+00:00): Gude und herzlich Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap
danke, dass du hilfst, die Karte aktuell zu halten :)

Eine Frage zu dieser Straße:
Welche Verkehrszeichen regeln hier die Durchfahrtsbeschränkungen genau?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149529446
dathoschy (2024-05-11 07:50:37+00:00): Zeichen 253 mit Zusatz Land und Forstwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei
silversurfer83 (2024-05-11 11:26:53+00:00): Moin :)

Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Die Zugangsberechtigungen waren etwas sehr ausführlich gesetzt. Ich hab das mal etwas aufgeräumt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151181486

Bei der Entscheidung, welche Berechtigungen gesetzt werden, hilft ein Blick auf das VZ und dann auf dieses Werkzeug: https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

Welches Verkehrsmittel wo entlang darf taggen wir in DE üblicherweise anhand der rechtslage. Wenn an einem Weg oder einer Straße kein legal bindendes Ver- oder Gebot steht, muss auch nicht unbedingt explizit etwas an den Weg getaggt werden.

Dinge, die erfasst werden sollten, auch wenn keine Schilder vorhanden sind: Berechtigungen an Feld- und Waldwegen, da diese häufig von
a) dem Landeswaldgesetz abhängig sind und die in ihrer Komplexität nicht in den Routingalgorhytmen erfasst werden
und
b) den Feldwegesatzungen der Gemeinde.
Dort steht jeweils, welche Verkehrsmittel welche Wege nutzen dürfen ohne explizit Schilder aufzustellen.

Bei Fragen immer raus damit und weiter viel Spaß an der Karte
silversurfer83
dathoschy (2024-05-11 12:09:32+00:00): Nun an der Straße herrscht ein entsprechendes Verbot. So wie es zuerst eingetragen wurde, wurde es z.b. OsmAnd nicht berücksichtigt.

LKWs dürfen diese Strecke nicht befahren, es ist lediglich der Land und Forstwirtschaftlichliche Verkehr freigegeben.

Da in Osmand ja auch Schilder angezeigt werden, wäre das sich so wie ich es eingetragen habe, korrekt gewesen. Oder irre ich mich da?
silversurfer83 (2024-05-11 12:30:16+00:00): Wenn das Zusatzschild für L+F frei direkt unter dem 253 hängt, dann bezieht es sich nur auf das Verbot für LKW. Das Bedeutet, dass dort nir LKW im Dienste der Land- und Forstwirtschaft erlaubt sein. Alle anderen Verkehrsteilnehmer werden hier in keiner Form eingeschränkt und müssen deshalb auch nicht erwähnt werden.

Wenn Osmand damit nicht klar kommt, ist das zuerst ein Problem der Software. Das Schild ist, wenn du es korrekt beschrieben hast, nun auch korrekt erfasst.

Sollte ich etwas falsch verstanden haben bitte ich um Erklärung :)
dathoschy (2024-05-11 13:18:46+00:00): Achso, nein, da ist nur für LKWs ein Durchfahrtsverbot. Alle anderen dürfen. Dann habe ich das falsch verstanden :D
silversurfer83 (2024-05-11 14:02:05+00:00): Alles klar :)

Die Berechtigungen sind bei OSM nicht ganz selbsterklärend. Das ist völlig normal, dass Menschen da am Anfang ein bisschen daneben liegen.

Wenn du dich da einlesen möchtest empfehle ich
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
Und bei Fragen immer raus damit
dathoschy (2024-05-11 14:11:25+00:00): Ja, sobald was auftaucht, schrei ich um Hilfe
Davileci (2024-04-05 15:51:15+00:00): https://www.rae.es/ortografía/formas-cooficiales
SomeoneElse2 (2024-04-10 08:50:24+00:00): I've added "cuisine=pizza" to this because I think it's a fair bet :)
CjMalone (2024-04-10 09:11:12+00:00): Thanks
Jarek 🚲 (2025-04-09 14:56:36+00:00): Hey there, quick question. In this changeset you've deleted a crossing=no tags at 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/432744847/history

I was wondering if this was because a tool was complaining about them?

I've used crossing=no tags to reinforce where there is no pedestrian crossing at an intersection, because I found that pedestrian routers sometimes tend to leave sidewalks and use roadways to cross a bigger street at locations where there's actually no crossing. This usage is also supported by the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing=no?uselang=en

So if a tool is complaining or not supporting these, that would be good to know.
VLD157 (2025-04-09 16:34:09+00:00): Hello Jarek, 

This mapper is no longer active with our team, but I can respond on her behalf. 

The most likely reason that the tag was removed from this location is that it was placed on an intersect node with Cartwright Ave - our team member may have thought that this was incorrect since there is a valid crossing on that same road immediately to the west, very close by.  (It does not appear that her edit was caused by a tool suggestion). 

If your original edit was meant to indicate no crossing across Dufferin Street here, perhaps we can add a new node just to the north and/or south of node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/432744847 to add the crossing=no tag to, that way it will more directly show that it is for Dufferin Street. 

Please let me know if this edit would be acceptable. 

Thanks, VLD157
Jarek 🚲 (2025-04-10 02:47:59+00:00): Hi, thank you for the response, I appreciate it.

My initial goal with the crossing=no tag was to instruct routers not to have pedestrians cross here, rather than e.g. to communicate with other mappers that there really isn't a crossing here.

Routers incorrectly routing on the road rather than the sidewalk and crossing the street in unsafe places rather than on crossing ways is still an issue today, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=43.723463%2C-79.458302%3B43.722979%2C-79.456049 (and it's the same with all 3 routers on OSM.org: GraphHopper, OSRM, Valhalla)

But I think I see the issue you're pointing to: with a crossing=no tag at an intersection, a router can't know if they shouldn't route pedestrians along one street, along the other, or both. And in this case, routing along Dufferin Street would be valid, as long as the side of the street isn't changed.

And while I would say that a good pedestrian router shouldn't route along Dufferin Street itself given that sidewalks are mapped along it, equally, that good router wouldn't route along Dufferin Street to get anywhere from the T intersection.

So tagging the intersection itself crossing=no would be ambiguous for any router that attempts to read it, and not needed for a router that correctly prefers sidewalks.

And tagging crossing=no north and south of the intersection would only be useful for communication with other mappers, since it wouldn't change the situation for the routers. And at least in Toronto we haven't had a problem with mappers mapping crossings that don't exist, so I don't think it's particularly important to do so.

So I don't think a change here is really necessary now.

Thanks again!
--Jarek
Xvtn (2024-04-03 22:14:52+00:00): Howdy! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Looks great, no issues I can see! Thanks for your contribution.
Francesco Zanaboni (2024-04-03 15:21:24+00:00): Errore nel commento del changeset: "Aggiornamento area circostante ospedale"
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-03 15:30:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11783359714

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
gurglypipe (2024-04-03 15:35:41+00:00): Hiya, thanks for your contributions to Gressingham recently! It’s good to see some input from a local. :)
amcclements (2024-04-03 16:04:21+00:00): Hi, thanks ! There's a few more to come once I've figured out the correct way to do them. A couple of the local roads on OSM deviate from 'reality' as known locally and on the OS and county council datasets.
gurglypipe (2024-04-03 16:25:05+00:00): Good to hear! Feel free to message me privately if you have any questions about the best way to go about editing/tagging things. :)
Znaika (2024-08-08 21:09:46+00:00): Hi,
Ist Sandbergweg nicht mehr gesperrt? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23458439
ticki_52 (2024-08-15 07:56:05+00:00): Zu der Zeit als ich die Änderung durchgeführt habe, war der Weg für Fußgänger nicht geperrt.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-21 16:01:56+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11783380219/history has shop = warehouse that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=warehouse ? Is it place renting small space for people to store their stuff? If yes then it is shop=storage_rental - or is it some other kind of place? Are they selling large areas or entire warehouse to companies? If yes then shop=* is a poor tagging. Or are they selling warehousing equipment?
swinetown (2024-11-29 07:37:47+00:00): Hi, sorry for the late response but it looks like a general workplace equipment supplier. There's probably better tagging for it as I wasn't quite sure, I tagged it as that on a whim while adding a few businesses in this area.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-06 10:16:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtrade ?

Maybe with some subtag?
jptolosa (2024-04-05 04:07:56+00:00): Hola, según se ve en un mapa de una de las páginas que citaste, la línea doblaba hacia el sur casi hasta entrar a Pinto, del mismo modo que el artículo de Wikipedia habla de una estación con ese nombre: http://www.ferrocarrilesenelconosur.co.uk/Resources/Chillan%20map%20small.jpg
felipeeugenio (2024-04-05 11:45:39+00:00): Hola Sergio. Además hay partes donde ya estaba dibujada la lía, lo que pasa es que no está como rail, si no como el sendero o camino angosto que hoy es. por favor cuidado con este tipo de dibujos tan amplios.
mcliquid (2024-04-09 07:01:56+00:00): Hallo und danke für die Beantragung des Review. Was genau ist denn die GPZ Antenne? Ist es ein Bestandteil vom Gemeindepsychiatrischen Zentrum? Dank dir!
zorglubu (2024-04-06 17:19:23+00:00): Bonjour,

je me suis permis de supprimer l'attribut fixme qui sert à indiquer que quelque chose reste à modifier ou à améliorer.
Votre modification est bonne et ne doit donc pas être signalée ainsi. La description dans le changeset est plus que suffisante ;-)
Merci.
Protoxenus (2024-06-12 17:53:32+00:00): Hier hat sich jemand über dein mapping beschwert. Könntest du ändern oder ihm eine Antwort schreiben.
Gruß Protoxenus
NorthCrab_upload (2024-04-03 15:41:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082948705

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bxl-forever (2024-04-03 20:04:19+00:00): Cooking oil in a container owned by Bruxelles-Propreté/Net Brussel, really?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6161160330/history

Maybe an Oliobox instead, no?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:24:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:26:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-23 09:42:25+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11783402688/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
AurélienQ (2025-04-23 11:49:12+00:00): Hi ! 
It's a shop selling spare part of cars.
I still don't know how to map this, so I would appreciate your help.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-24 02:56:13+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcar_parts
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-24 02:57:25+00:00): edited it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165357798

see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11783402688
AurélienQ (2025-04-24 07:26:45+00:00): Thank you !
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:25:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.
ftrebien (2024-04-23 19:56:52+00:00): These buildings are part of and nearest to the Russian Bellingshausen station. To follow the informal convention used in the region for years, their main name should be in Russian.
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-04 01:02:37+00:00): DO NOT PARTIALLY OVERLAP AREAS!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149532419
Blixt99 (2024-04-04 22:29:33+00:00): Greens in OSM are "dominant" over fairways. To accurately represent the transition from fairway to green the splining of the fairway must go under the "dominant" green, in most cases for par 4's and par 5's. Doing it this way means the mown fairway comes right up to the fringe of the green so that balls, if hit short, can still roll up onto the green. If the fairway is kept short of the green than a patch of rough will be left between the end of the fairway and the green, which does not represent reality. Besides trying to represent reality I am also doing this in order to accurately transfer the course data into the golf course game designer I am using to recreate the course in the virtual world so that it can be played in the game by anyone who owns the game. I have played this course for many decades but can no longer play the real game, so recreating it in the game enables me to play it on my computer. What harm is being done by overlapping the green and fairway in OSM? How are you the judge and jury here? Do you really think anyone cares if there is a slight overlap of green and fairway, other then you? Please explain. I've done this same editing on other courses that I've played and had no complaints, so what gives?
SomeoneElse (2024-04-08 19:44:39+00:00): Actually, it's not true to say that "greens are dominant over fairways".  Different renderers processing OSM data will use different rules, but a common one is "draw smaller areas over larger ones" which lead to the effect that you think you're seeing.  
However, if something is either fairway or not green it does make sense to have them as non-overlapping, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/CurlingMan13 has now edited it.
SomeoneElse (2024-04-08 19:46:06+00:00): Of course, nodes can be part of two ways if features join, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11747001741 now is here.
CurlingMan13 (2024-04-09 18:30:51+00:00): I also explained it here in response to a note on my changeset.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149548637
jmarchon (2024-04-04 00:02:01+00:00): Nice work! Welcome to OSM!
BR_pebble (2024-05-21 11:01:58+00:00): Hello lsbravoc
Thank you for mapping!
I have added missing buildings: 6.2733497, -75.5582222;
6.2734231, -75.5585361;
6.2728872, -75.5585642;
6.2728725, -75.5575879;
6.273807, -75.5578414;
6.2737123, -75.5583604
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!
N1T3R (2024-04-05 01:00:24+00:00): For such a huge changeset, can you split it into multiple uploads in the future?
To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
Combine changes in a small geographical area within a (city, district or province)
Keep changes within the same (country)
Upload/Save changes before moving on to map in a different area.
See: Changeset. Changeset - OpenStreetMap Wiki. (n.d.). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset
ceirios (2024-04-10 18:02:18+00:00): P'nawn da manincyprus, a chroeso i OSM! I saw your note & tag asking for feedback.

Is permission still required from Celtic Manor Resort to use the bridge & gattes? If so, it might be worth revisiting some of the access tags. Perhaps 'private' or 'permit' might be better here instead of just 'no'?

The OpenStreetMap Wiki may help you as well:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

Happy mapping :)
Ceirios
manincyprus (2024-04-11 06:55:22+00:00): Diolch Ceirios, yes, perhaps "private" would be better. I don't know specifically if you can request permission from the Celtic Manor but yes, the bridge is owned by them. Now I need to work out how to change it to private!
ceirios (2024-04-11 20:36:47+00:00): If you're on desktop, you can click Edit at the top, click on the bridge and then the tag fields will be on the left.

If you need to look at the tutorial or want to have a read of the tips, you can press H (or click the [?] on the right) whilst editing :)
Bienson (2024-04-03 22:54:42+00:00): Hi,

Wenn StreetComplete nach Adressen für Gebäudeteile fragt, bitte eine Fehlermeldung erstellen, dass es ein Gebäudeteil von Gebäude XY ist. Dann kann das jemand anderes oder du selber später fixen und als Gebäudeteil eingetragen.
In Dortmund sind - bis auf Neubauten - eigentlich alle Adressen bereits eingetragen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-09 12:23:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149775072 where the changeset comment is: Reverting automatic name changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7392 4.