piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2024-08-07 20:10:38+00:00): Hi Kari59bib, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 93% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 11 highway(s)
- 63 building(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=154952208
Kari59bib (2024-08-08 13:46:48+00:00): I confirm the deletions, it is about a quarter that was previously inhabited exclusively with shacks (simple huts of the so-called squatters) and now receives / has received paths, roads and new buildings.
Emilius123 (2024-08-07 21:20:53+00:00): Dankeschön!
Patchi (2024-08-08 05:37:53+00:00): Hello Meinew,

Splitting the roundabout may be an purpose and was indeed in this case. We discussed a lot about the best practise for roundabouts in the french OSM community (see the feed here https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/cartographier-les-rond-points/24548/15). Please check the next time you want to have one single roundabout object if there relations onto this roundabout - and if yes please let the roundabout as it is. This could save us a lot of time to correct the relations.

Thanks in advance and best regards,

Patchi.
Meinew (2024-08-08 06:20:42+00:00): Hello Patchi,
Sorry for the trouble. I checked for some indications preventing to merge into a single object. But I did not found clear mention of it on the wiki. I thought the way to cross the intersection was obvious (turning anticlockwise in France), but I forgot that not only cars use roundabout. I thought also it was easier for routes relations to have only one object (quite small at the scale of the entire route) rather than many parts that could mess up the route if somebody would splits parts incorrectly (I was first editing routes and that what I found in some of them).

With the linked discussion I understand the issue. I will revert my work. Thank you.

Meinew
Patchi (2024-08-08 13:41:30+00:00): Hello Meinew,

No trouble about this, this is a community. :-)
I already revert one roundabout and will do as much as I can today. I will also check the bus route relations in the coming days so no worries it will be OK soon.

Best regards,

Patchi.
Patchi (2024-08-08 15:28:11+00:00): The split of the 5 roundabouts is now done.
Meinew (2024-08-08 17:59:48+00:00): Thanks for the reverts.
As splitting is the rule, should we split even more ? 
For example there are no split on node 26679928 (north entrance from Chemin du Bois Cornage) nor on node 26679937 (north exit).
Patchi (2024-08-08 18:09:20+00:00): We split only when there is a relation (which is per definition only using a portion of the roundabout). Therefore when you don't have a relation (which is the case for the Chemin du Bois de Cornage, you don't need to split the roundabout segment more than it is now.
bwbuz (2024-08-08 12:48:09+00:00): Moin, wieso fügst du hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1306241330 eine Nebenstraße einfach mal so ins Blaue ein, obwohl hier gar nichts dergleichen ist???
eggie (2024-08-08 05:37:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Dit s wat je gedaan hebt. Dat lijkt me niet correct. Wat is je bedoeling?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=154952979

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-08-08 05:51:09+00:00): reverted by changeset #154961900


Je edits zijn allemaal teruggedraaid. 
Neem svp even contact met me op voordat je verder gaat mappen.
Wellicht was je iets aan het uitproberen, maar dat kwam helaas allemaal op de kaart. 

MVG
eggie
kapazao (2024-09-12 09:05:19+00:00): Hola, ¿podrías dar información acerca del pub Amazonia que añadiste en el centro comercial Nevada?
No veo referencia en su web.
Un saludo
_Atlas_ (2024-09-12 18:43:44+00:00): El bar es un poco confuso porque tiene varios nombres. Quizá me equivoqué de nombre. Pero "Amazonia" se muestra claramente fuera
kapazao (2024-09-13 10:08:54+00:00): Por lo que veo parece ser parte del local Enjoy It. Se ve un letrero que pone Amazonia Coctails.
https://nevada.shopping/enjoy-it-llega-a-nevada-shopping
Remuevo dicho local, que es incorrecto, y dejamos Enjoy It.
Un saludo
eggie (2024-08-08 05:42:13+00:00): Dag Bert,

Alle begin is moeilijk
Je hebt hier een klein stukje woonstraat ingetekend dat nergens aan vast zit. Wat was je bedoeling?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-08 05:48:15+00:00): reverted by changeset #154961862
InfosReseaux (2025-02-09 21:28:03+00:00): Bonsoir Hugo

Je vois pas mal de lignes électriques qui n'ont pas de supports dans cette zone et ailleurs dans l'Ain.
Que certains poteaux supportent des lampadaires n'est pas incompatible avec power=pole.
On doit alors combiner power=pole + highway=street_lamp.

Voir cette analyse Osmose pour situer les problèmes.
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#item=7040&class=4&country=france*&loc=12/45.87555/5.13647&level=1%2C2%2C3
Est-ce parce que les lignes ont disparu ou bien que c'est un réel manque ?

Bonne soirée
HugoC01 (2025-03-02 15:52:21+00:00): Bonjour InfosReseaux

C'est bien un réel manque de ma part sur mes 1000 premiers changesets.
Je corrige petit à petit les éléments concernés.
Je vais corriger cet zone cet après-midi et ce soir.

Bonne fin de journée.
InfosReseaux (2025-03-02 19:15:26+00:00): Bonsoir Hugo

Très bien si c'est pris en compte, pas nécessaire de le traiter super vite.
Il y a cette page pour assister la correction si besoin : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_networks/France/Maintenance_qualit%C3%A9

Bonne soirée
d3mol3k (2024-08-08 14:11:17+00:00): żadnych linii zasilającej nie ma nad torami w tej zmianie - wycofuję zmianę
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.41963740000196&lng=14.565383597883965&z=19.9&pKey=756002622829070&focus=photo
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-08-08 17:43:41+00:00): czemu tak wyedytowałeś https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011073619/history ?
BCNorwich (2024-08-09 07:31:41+00:00): Hi, I've unjoined the grass areas from highway center lines.
eggie (2024-08-08 05:45:10+00:00): Beste Bert.. Dit lijkt toch op vernieling van de kaart. Wat is je bedoeling. Alles wat je uploadt komt ook daadwerkelijk op de wereldkaart van OSM.
Je edits..

Ik zal je bijdragen allemaal terugdraaien. Neem svp even contact op met mij voordat je verder mapt.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-08-08 05:46:59+00:00): reverted by changeset #154961840
eggie (2024-08-08 08:16:26+00:00): Dit waren je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=154953758

Heb je wellicht de editor van osm willen gebruiken als routeplanner?
Daar is die niet voor bedoeld.

Mvg

eggie
Bert Smid (2024-08-08 10:04:00+00:00): Nee, ook niet de bedoeling. Het echte probleem is dat ik mijn geuploade GPX route niet in de open street map zie verschijnen, maar wel in de "bewerkbare omgeving".
Hiermee zou ik ontzettend geholpen zijn als dit lukt
eggie (2024-08-08 10:10:05+00:00): Dag Bert..
Wanneer je even op kaartlagen klikt rechts in het scherm en dan kiest voor openbare gps tracks onderin zie je de openbare tracks op de kaart verschijnen. Dus niet de editor openen. Dat is een omgeving om de kaart te bewerken.
Ben je met die info geholpen?
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2024-08-08 10:11:44+00:00): Wanneer ik kies voor openbare gps trajecten zie ik kleurtjes op de kaart verschijnen.
eggie (2024-08-08 10:15:22+00:00): In de editor kun je wel een gpstraxk openen. Dat is dan een hulp om zo'n track over te trekken en/of wegen goed te leggen.
In Nederland met de pdok op de achtergrond is de foto meer betrouwbaar dan een opgenomen track.
Wat is je bedoeling met die track?
eggie (2024-08-08 10:18:19+00:00): Een geuploade track werkt slleen als je hem opgeslagen hebt als een gpx bestand.
Wanneer je een garmin gebruikt dan wordt zo n bestand sutomatisch een gdb bestand. Je zult het dan handmatig moeten opslaan en kiezen voor gpx als extentie.
eggie (2024-08-08 10:22:06+00:00): ..... en in de editmodus dus je gpx bestand openen... anders zie je niets.
eggie (2024-08-08 10:45:45+00:00): ... maar mijn advies is om zonder ervaring uit de editmodus van osm te blijven.
Er gaat te veel fout. Je bewerkt onbewust de kaart van osm.
Wanneer je precies vertelt wat je plan is met die tracklogs kan ik je vast wel helpen.
jedportman (2024-08-07 21:00:18+00:00): *Gardner!
Awoobis (2024-09-15 11:27:39+00:00): Hejo, chcialem zwrócić twoją uwagę na platformy przy przystankach autobusowych. Są one niemozliwe w utrzymaniu, streetcomplete prosi o duplikaty danych.  Jednakze bez tagu public_transport=platform jest OK. wiec zostaje bus=yes, highway=platform. Tak jest też robione w warszawie np https://www.osm.org/way/303045662/history. Tak je przerobiłem blisko ulicy Karczókowskiej np https://www.osm.org/way/1289698652.
mcliquid (2024-08-07 21:29:47+00:00): P1 stimmt hier schon. Dies ist die offizielle Referenznummer der DB BahnPark GmbH, welche hier Eigentümerin des Parkplatzes ist. Die Contipark Parkgaragengesellschaft mbH ist Betreiber. Beide führen für diesen Parkplatz "P1".
https://parkenambahnhof.de/karte?space=Parkplatz+Bahnhof+Lindau-Insel&id=100193&lat=47.543496&lng=9.68095
https://www.dbbahnpark.de/content/fahrplanauskunft/bahnpark/pdf/8000230.pdf
https://www.mein-contipark.de/parkplatz-finden/parken-in-lindau/parkplatz-bahnhof-lindau-insel-p1-lindau--ci3cp1124279
Znaika (2024-08-07 21:48:57+00:00): OK. Verstanden
literan (2024-08-08 17:07:17+00:00): не надо использовать тег https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:usage=main на путях депо, вы не понимаете что он означает. Ознакомьтесь с вики
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-07 22:36:05+00:00): Please use compatible sources.
reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154956111
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-08-08 14:52:58+00:00): I believe this entrance is accessible to customers? access=customers is the ocorrect tag here. private would be for employee only. Can you confirm please?
mashdash (2024-08-08 15:04:45+00:00): They've recently changed this area's circulation, to improve the safety of the bike path. The exit/entrance is only for trucks filling up gasoline for the station. 

The other access is only an entrance to the parking lot and not an exit. Cars exiting are meant to use rue Wellington to avoid crossing the bike path.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-08-08 15:23:23+00:00): OK, fixed with hgv and trucks tags.
DressyPear4 (2024-08-08 16:03:01+00:00): Olá, nomes não devem ser adicionados em caixa alta
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154954089
d3mol3k (2024-08-08 13:59:33+00:00): Dlaczego oddajesz ulice itorowiska w budowie jako oddane? już zwracano Tobie uwagę? Ulice zamknięte dla ruchu za wyjątkiem pojazdów budowy a nad tormi nie ma jeszcze zasilania. Wycofuję tę twoją zmianę.
Lucyferek (2024-08-08 15:21:47+00:00): Sugeruję zgłosić użytkownika byczeQ
d3mol3k (2024-08-08 15:25:53+00:00): Zgłosiłem na forum poczekam co dalej chwil kilka i zgłoszę z poziomu OSM - bo ostatni ban nie nauczył użytkownika niczego
spiregrain (2024-08-08 07:48:31+00:00): Interesting - do these two changesets (#154954364 and  #154954687) mean that the closure will be between the stairs just west of Manor Road up to Canning Road only?   I had been assuming it was as far east as the Long Wall / Abbey Road ramp.
MacLondon (2024-08-08 16:31:46+00:00): The 18 month closure will be to the east of Canning Rd. This is the major work involved in this scheme.

The closure to the west of Canning Rd will only be for 2 or 3 months, possibly Dec 2024-Feb 2025.
spiregrain (2024-08-09 08:00:08+00:00): Thank you!  And thanks for updating the access tags...
MacLondon (2024-08-09 15:10:54+00:00): It's not impossible that the temporary crossing on Manor Rd near Pond Rd could get relocated before the diversion begins.

Also I wouldn't be surprised if the advertised cycle route diversion changes to use the full length of Leywick St.

I'll be away when the diversion starts so if you're going to be surveying the diversion, OSM might need some adjustments to get things accurate.

I was told the ramp to the Greenway from Manor Rd is to get widened before the closure begins. I suspect its width won't actually change though. They have cleared the vegetation already which might be the 'widening', but it will be interesting to see if they do move the handrails further apart. (The steps nearby will remain open.)
spiregrain (2024-08-09 15:16:05+00:00): There is a 'Note' about the closure, and I'll refer to these change set comments in it.  I'm sure someone will pick up the required surveys/edits.
spiregrain (2024-08-09 15:16:49+00:00): I popped down there yesterday afternoon, and found that the Thames Water Roadshow had already packed up and gone away, some time before advertised.
SomeoneElse (2024-08-07 21:31:00+00:00): Opinions differ about future status.
Local press has "owners on holiday but will not reopen", another has "long term closed", and a rumour in another York pub is that another (well known) local landlord is likely to take it on.
None of which contradicts that it's currently shut...
SomeoneElse (2025-01-07 22:09:55+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161112751
Katrin_H (2024-08-14 13:20:43+00:00): Hi Thore,
ich würde das Zusatzzeichen dann eher nicht taggen. Was lässt dich denn vermuten, dass es eigentlich da sein sollte? Bzw. die Vermutung kannst du ja immer noch als note äußern, würde aber das taggen, was auch wirklich dort ist :)
thorescharnweber (2024-08-14 22:50:02+00:00): Soll ich das nur an dem Schild direkt ändern oder auch an der Straße? Wenn ich das da auch ändere, weiß ich nicht, wie ich das taggen soll, weil man von Norden ja in die Straße reinfahren darf, aber von Süden dann nicht und wenn ich das ändere, kann ein Routing Algorithmus einen auch nicht mehr da lang schicken, weil der vordere Streckenabschnitt dann ja theoretisch gesperrt ist für Fahrräder.
Katrin_H (2024-08-19 12:46:13+00:00): Wenn sich am nördlichen Ende kein Verbotsschild befindet, dann würde ich es nur am Schild ändern und am Weg den traffic-sign Tag komplett weglassen
Robot8A (2025-04-15 16:27:27+00:00): I fixed the location of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12097804039 on changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164993657
dieterdreist (2025-04-16 08:42:28+00:00): great, thank you!
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-08-09 18:57:26+00:00): Hi!
You should connect new paths to the footway. This allows users to see that they can actually go there and routing software to plot a route through them.

Adding bicycle=yes and foot=yes is not required, it's implied by default for a path.
literan (2024-08-08 17:03:38+00:00): не надо вносить в тег name описания объектов ,все равно вычистят

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%98%D0%BC%D1%8F_%E2%80%93_%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE
literan (2024-08-08 17:05:18+00:00): также, не надо использовать тег noexit=yes для железных дорог (это тег для автодорог). Используйте тег буферного упора.
Erick Araujo (2026-02-26 18:38:43+00:00): Reverted the changes because didn't reflect the reallity, please, don't do it, talk with the local community before do the changes!!!!!!!!!! I've already spoked with a lot of you guys, because everytime I need to revert the changes that you do without the local knowledge.
Lars_TheViking (2026-02-26 23:38:40+00:00): Hello Erick Araujo,

It looks like you are referring to the highway=construction road segments that were present at around -23.0039883, -43.3199413 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-23.004186/-43.320171&layers=N), and I see that you have deleted them.  I wanted to clarify that those segments were initially set to highway=service, and I noticed back in August 2024 that the imagery at the time showed construction was going on in the area.  Rather than delete them outright, I set them to highway=construction because it was unclear what it was going to look like after construction was complete.  Now with much more recent imagery we can see significant changes here and I agree with your decision to ultimately delete them from the data.

Thanks,
Lars_TheViking
DaveF (2024-08-08 09:33:14+00:00): Hi.
There can't be a bridge /and/ a tunnel. It has to be one or the other.
In this case it's clear the raised railway is bridging over the road.
RamenBot 🍝 (2024-08-07 22:32:52+00:00): Please stop using incompatible sources.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-07 22:36:06+00:00): Please use compatible sources.
reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154956111
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-08-08 02:52:18+00:00): Please stop using Google and use proper changeset comments.
reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154959005
woodpeck_repair (2024-08-07 22:32:42+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 154892193, 154892783, 154892904, 154893238, 154893468, 154896862, 154896925, 154897010, 154897612, 154897928, 154904774, 154936670, 154936775, 154936808, 154936978, 154938911, 154938997.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-07 22:40:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2755186418
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2755184549
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159156417
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1306257246

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
GinaroZ (2024-08-08 13:58:06+00:00): what is your source for these names?
mcliquid (2024-08-08 06:21:08+00:00): Why you deleted just the name?
mcliquid (2024-08-08 06:49:37+00:00): This changeset was reverted completely.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154963506
Tom Pouce (2024-08-08 12:34:14+00:00): The name is not correct.
Its a 'hut' where you can recieve some food but this is not the Bargunthütte.
The bargunthütte is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129428169
Tom Pouce (2024-08-08 12:39:03+00:00): https://maps.app.goo.gl/ZvL9HoSXnBMTufKd9
mcliquid (2024-08-08 16:20:55+00:00): I'm really sorry. Both huts have a similar name, I did not know. Please excuse my actions. Above is the Bärgunt-Hochalpe and below is the Bärgunt-Hütte.

https://www.kleinwalsertal-berghuetten.com/b%C3%A4rguntalp

I've fixed that now. Sorry again.
Tom Pouce (2024-08-08 21:38:08+00:00): No problem. Issue solved.
Thanks to contribute OSM.
gabro00 (2024-08-08 10:36:09+00:00): Szia! Közutak igazításához kérlek minden esetben a legújabb FÖMI hátteret használd. Mostanában láttam, hogy nagy munkával többünk által helyre húzott főutak nyomvonala vándorolt el :(
kuhni74 (2025-05-23 11:43:59+00:00): Und wo könnte genau der Obere Berggeistturm liegen? sh. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4771686
kuhni74 (2025-05-23 16:01:52+00:00): Und wo der Obere Schüsselkarturm?
fananas1 (2024-08-07 23:46:33+00:00): https://fananas1.blogspot.com/
VictorIE (2024-08-19 01:35:08+00:00): Hi,

Is this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12097981995 a duplicate of this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11677814378 post box?
eda_n (2024-08-07 23:50:41+00:00): Sources : survey et wikipedia
Pt873 (2024-08-08 15:00:43+00:00): Olá, a região passou por obras e a configuração das vias foi alterado. Editei novamente para como está agora.
WahibaSands (2024-08-12 15:26:56+00:00): Pt873
Thank you for updating me on the construction and updating the data here. I will defer to your edits. Have a great day!

Tradução automática
Obrigado por me atualizar sobre a construção e atualizar os dados aqui. Vou adiar suas edições. Tenha um ótimo dia!
kapazao (2026-01-10 10:12:19+00:00): Hola, la fuente de este lugar (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12098049659) es de Google (no válida) y no aparece referenciado en ninguna otra parte, ¿podrías revisarlo?

Un saludo
cronoser (2026-01-21 00:40:20+00:00): Hola, la referencia no es Google como tal, sino el libro "Los alfoces de Arreba, de Bricia y de Santa Gadea Los valles de Bezana y de Zamanzas" de la escritora "María del Carmen Arribas Magro" página 430.
kapazao (2026-01-27 09:35:52+00:00): Gracias por la corrección, ahora queda más claro.
Un saludo
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-14 08:48:48+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1306274409/history has building = static_caravanq that was added in this edit
building=static_caravanq ? Maybe intention was to use building=static_caravan and then square area?
AndrewSnow (2025-12-15 01:56:59+00:00): Very likely - JOSM runs sluggishly for me.  This typo has been fixed.
felipeeugenio (2024-08-10 22:34:45+00:00): Hola.
Los mapas disponibles del IGM están bastante obsoletos. Otro mapero revisará los cambios. pero por favor no trabajar para que ambos mapas sean iguales. Ya hemos detectado varios nombres incorrectos.
felipeeugenio (2024-08-10 22:35:33+00:00): Además por favor no cambiar las categorías de los lugares sin consultar en la comunidad.
Gracias
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 04:45:19+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165053304
5m4u9 (2024-08-08 05:29:51+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar en el mapa.

Hay algunos errores en tu edición, normalmente el "nombre" de la cancha no es el nombre del estadio y viceversa... 

no va bien sustituir las canchas por el techo, lo mejor es añadir por encima. de todas formas ya le añadí la característica que la cancha es techada.
felipeeugenio (2024-08-08 17:27:33+00:00): Hola.
Estas calles no son residenciales.
Por favor consultar a la comunidad OSM para este tipo de cambios.
gracias
James2813 (2024-08-08 17:39:32+00:00): Hola!
Aunque las imágenes no lo muestran, esos caminos son las calles de un reciente proyecto de parcelaciones. Tal vez haya que especificar el material; pero sí son residenciales.
Saludos
felipeeugenio (2024-08-08 17:57:45+00:00): Hola. Gracias por responder.
tiene información sobre ese loteo? 
es algo donde actualmente hay casas? o está en fase de construcción aún?
James2813 (2024-08-08 18:13:52+00:00): Hola.
https://www.laquebradilla.cl/
Ese es el link, en el mapa aparecen las calles.
Se ve que es un terreno grande a lotear y solo han sido compradas algunas parcelas. Creo en en google maps hay imagenes mas recientes.
Saludos.
felipeeugenio (2024-08-08 18:47:44+00:00): ok, las dejé como residenciales. y agregué el nodo del Loteo como locality, a la espera de que tenga habitantes
James2813 (2024-08-08 23:37:30+00:00): OK. Puse el área total del loteo residencial, no agregué la división por cercas todavía. Dígame si está bien así. Agregué la fuente, es el mapa de la página donde muestra el área que se va a ocupar. Saludos.
felipeeugenio (2024-08-09 12:55:28+00:00): Está OK así. aunque le puede hacer ruido a alguna gente porque en verdad todavía no hay nada ahí. Las cosas en construcción siempre han sido un tema en OSM. Moví el nodo a la entrada del condominio. para que se pueda "llegar".
Saludos
felipeeugenio (2024-08-09 12:57:44+00:00): El tema de las numeraciones las vemos después, porque a veces los condominios tienen un solo número de calle para todas las casas y el número de la casa pasa a ser addr:unit=.
A veces pasa que tienen las calles nombres internos.
Si no hay número usar nohousenumber=yes y no es famoso addr:housumber=S/N, que está incorrecto.
Si el número es un kilometro, usar addr:milestone=XX. con el puro número de los kilometros. no el "Km".
Saludos
user_11609320 (2024-08-08 02:51:39+00:00): The usa gas station will most likely be rebranded arco again. Marathon is phasing out the USA gas brand nationwide
Cubano153 (2024-08-08 15:12:12+00:00): No podía hacer ninguna edición. Es cierto que lo hacía pero porque no sabía.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154984334
ilovelegos (2024-08-08 02:58:58+00:00): Missing Source: Local Knowledge, https://www.facebook.com/RVCLife
emersonveenstra (2024-08-12 14:40:59+00:00): Hi there,

Could you please go back and fix the website of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1222960726? Thanks!
user_11609320 (2024-08-12 20:11:36+00:00): yeah. that is weird that it cut it off.
yurinchi (2024-08-08 03:21:19+00:00): local knowledgeではなくsurvey
ElliottPlack (2025-08-31 19:49:34+00:00): thanks for adding this link!