piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kaeso (2026-03-24 13:30:30+00:00): Capisco l'intento, ma questa relazione rappresenta specificamente solo il "Cammino di San Jacopo in Toscana", consistente di 6 tappe ben definite tra Firenze e Livorno.
Altri cammini/percorsi che vanno a Santiago possono essere mappati con altre relazioni dedicate.
Visto che il "Cammino di San Jacopo in Toscana" non include un tratto marittimo, potresti ripristinare il percorso corretto Firenze-Livorno?
Paolo Rindi (2026-03-24 14:05:02+00:00): forse potremmo per il momento metterlo in sospeso, però si sta concretizzando anche la tappa a bordo con convenzioni con la compagnia marittima in modo da proseguire in Sardegna... è un vero peccato non mettere in evidenza questa possibilità... comunque va bene, forse ho in mente una soluzione diversa... grazie per la considerazione
marsbar28 (2026-03-22 11:30:00+00:00): Looks like the building has moved to the north while you've been editing? Now over Commercial Way
rskedgell (2026-03-23 09:17:40+00:00): Apologies, that looks like a fat finger error while using Vespucci. Should be fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180292999
whitepanda (2026-03-24 04:54:42+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180298156
eggie (2026-03-22 08:51:12+00:00): Dag De Bakker. De info heb ik samengevoegd.
De specificatie ontbreekt nog.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility

MVG
eggie
johsin18 (2026-03-22 09:48:12+00:00): Laut hier ist der Betrieb inzwischen geschlossen:
https://www.badische-zeitung.de/weiler-gipser-und-stuckateuerbetrieb-fuchs-muss-nach-fast-97-jaehriger-firmengeschichte-schliessen
NeisBot (2026-03-22 08:00:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1491399695 v1 | 6 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180237128
MappingMore (2026-03-24 04:57:07+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 180334338
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-24 06:35:40+00:00): @MappingMore Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting here.

Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180334338 would be very helpful.

Thanks!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-01 23:25:09+00:00): Corrected parking tags added by SEO spam account and added additional in changeset 183522140

https://osm.org/changeset/183522140
Bienson (2026-03-23 02:53:05+00:00): Bitte erkläre mir doch, wie so ein Edit - immer und immer wieder - zustande kommt.
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-23 06:56:18+00:00): Was für ein Edit?
Bienson (2026-03-23 15:42:15+00:00): Dieser Edit.
Bienson (2026-03-26 23:43:27+00:00): building="levels=1" und adrr="country=DE"
Bienson (2026-03-23 02:57:35+00:00): Der Name "Steinmetz Ihrig" ist auch nicht korrekt - selber ausgezeichnet als "Steinbildhauerei Ihrig".
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-23 17:50:07+00:00): Please, read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Version in Russian which hopefully is well translated: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments
josemonkey (2026-03-22 17:21:04+00:00): You beat me to it! 🤪 I made some tweaks to these buildings to make sure they also included the brand:wikidata metadata 👍
mueschel (2026-03-26 19:12:10+00:00): Hi,
the tag "taxi:HK-Urban" is new. In the database I find three different spellings:

taxi:HK-Urban
taxi:HK:Urban
taxi:HK:urban

Would it be possible to change all the objects to one common version?
Kovoschiz (2026-03-27 08:00:13+00:00): @ kingkingHK `taxi:HK-Urban=` is wrong, as it's not a geographical subdivision, nor national-specific tags. `taxi:HK-NT=` isn't limited to NT. `taxi:HK:Urban=` should be used for vehicle classes.
Bienson (2026-03-23 03:01:27+00:00): Nun zwei doppelt überlagernde, unnötige Multipolygone
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-23 07:03:54+00:00): ich habe nun die kleine Pflasterfläche rausgelassen. So richtig? VG
Bienson (2026-03-23 03:05:20+00:00): "Grabmale Hibbeln GmbH" ist auch nicht der ausgeschilderte Name, sondern der Name der betreibende Firma (operator=*).
Bienson (2026-03-23 03:05:34+00:00): operator=*
FajrAl (2026-03-23 16:26:13+00:00): Changeset ini tidak menambahkan TPA
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-22 09:21:39+00:00): Hi,

may we know the reason behind renaming the river from "Fiume Platani" to "c"?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306401118/history/40

Thanks.
PA_Barre (2026-03-22 10:29:28+00:00): Hi, 
It was a mistake. Sorry.
The correct name is "Fiume Platani".
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-22 10:32:11+00:00): Thanks for your reply, PA_Barre

Could you please correct it?
AndyB_66 (2026-03-22 18:12:23+00:00): Ten odcinek S17 nie jest w budowie - nie twórz fikcji.  Robisz to zresztą po raz kolejny - następny taki wybryk i dostaniesz bana.
postown (2026-03-24 11:30:16+00:00): 同区間は既に川崎市からも発表があった通り、先日から4車線化が完了しています。勝手な形状変更はご遠慮ください。
eggie (2026-03-22 10:49:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Probeer als het kan op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
MappingMore (2026-03-28 05:34:58+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180529226
sanchi (2026-04-21 06:05:04+00:00): Hola.
Ene ste conjunto de cambios le pusistes número a una casa pero no tiene calle a la que pertenezca ese número. Sabes a que calle pertenece?
Un saludo
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-22 10:15:07+00:00): Hello,

may we know the reason behind removing wikidata=Q20429820 and wikipedia=ro:Gara Piatra Neamț ?

Thanks.
user_15202633 (2026-03-22 10:25:01+00:00): Just so you know, we at Piatra-Neamț don’t want false information on the web platforms we use every day.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-22 10:16:11+00:00): Hello,

may we know the reason behind removing the following tags here?
wikidata=Q20429820
wikipedia=ro:Gara Piatra Neamț

Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-22 10:19:00+00:00): And of course renaming to "Piatra-Neamț" ...
user_15202633 (2026-03-22 10:22:58+00:00): Are you a local?
user_15202633 (2026-03-22 10:24:04+00:00): Just so you know, we at Piatra-Neamț don’t want false information on the web platforms we use every day.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2026-04-13 07:45:13+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن شخصية للخريطة
NeisBot (2026-03-22 10:45:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/140892641 v9

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Chocolate shop"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "Schokoladenladen"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-30 16:33:05+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180243088
arjunaraoc (2026-03-23 01:15:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180277531
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180242846
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Darnight14 (2026-03-22 11:01:49+00:00): 画路怎么算这么多编辑量）
iandees (2026-03-22 13:24:39+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/307713933, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3778614094 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180249787, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
qcmeier (2026-03-22 17:02:39+00:00): Thank you for the correction and your information. I will pay attention to it in the future. Many thanks.
chnuessli (2026-03-23 12:07:05+00:00): Are there really three different locations or is one of them a duplicate? your description seems like the same 24/7 defi as the one of the police station?
DomFlc (2026-03-23 20:13:10+00:00): I'm not sure. Could just see the defibrillator on the outside of the building. I thought about it at the moment and found it possible, that there would be multiple, including in the building, especially as the two positioned in the building were already both recorded and assigned to the police station and the municipality respectively. Given it being an "important" public building, it might be intentional to have it as easy as possible to find one?
All I can say for certain, is that there exists a defibrillator at the position I recorded.
chnuessli (2026-04-02 07:30:17+00:00): I put up a note on this matter: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5229737

Maybe you can check again if you're onsite? Otherwise an other user is able to verify.
Piagno (2026-05-01 16:01:41+00:00): Ich habe es nach Auskunft der Gemeinde angepasst.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182081988
iandees (2026-03-22 13:24:47+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10217350395, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10217350427, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5917359693, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5917359697, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6434611618, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9354133514 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180249793, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Sandal man (2026-03-22 15:25:15+00:00): Hai scritto "modifiche minori" e hai rimosso 3626 punti?
NeisBot (2026-03-22 11:39:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13668732216 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Centro de bienestar"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-30 16:33:10+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180638439
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
SantiagoHurtadoOverMap (2026-03-30 18:44:50+00:00): Hi! Oh, okay, thank you very much. Sorry, I'm new to this and I don't quite understand it, but I'll keep it in mind for future updates!
eggie (2026-03-22 12:01:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Alles wat je aanpast staat direct op de kaart. 
Is er wel sprake van een pad (path)  of voetpad. (footway) ?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-22 12:17:39+00:00): noexit=yes toegevoegd.. Oprijlaan weer toegevoegd
BramvL1337 (2026-03-22 14:50:04+00:00): Er is geen enkele open verbinding. De weg eindigt bij nummer 79. Dank voor de informatie!
rskedgell (2026-03-23 08:54:22+00:00): Using the disused:* lifecycle prefix implies that the former Shoreditch East London Line station is "Not currently in use, but could be reinstated easily". This is absolutely not the case. Please restore it to historic:*

See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Xeroctic (2026-03-23 10:44:35+00:00): I changed it to abandoned:railway instead (historic:railway does not have a Wiki page and is less precise)
rskedgell (2026-03-23 11:17:26+00:00): Thanks.
whitepanda (2026-03-24 04:45:20+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 180333587
rodolfovargas (2026-03-22 14:16:14+00:00): Buenos aportes. Continua aportando a OSM.
hfs (2026-05-18 06:30:06+00:00): Hi schilling5628,

you marked this as “Netto” with brand:wikidata=Q552652. But actually it’s a “Netto Marken-Discount” with brand:wikidata=Q879858.

See https://www.netto-online.de/filialen/gross-gerau/muenchener-strasse-2/5966

Please be aware that there are two “Netto” chains in Germany and one has to check which one it is.

I fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182813618
Dimitar155 (2026-03-22 12:48:24+00:00): Това е административна граница според землищата на населените места. Не случайно има толкова възли.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180248018
canfe (2026-04-10 07:54:02+00:00): Non si usano mai le abbreviazioni (Loc. in questo caso)
Map47 (2026-04-10 13:01:20+00:00): Sono perplesso, questa affermazione è sicuramente valida quando si inserisce il nome della località.
In questo caso stiamo inserendo un indirizzo non una località, pertanto mi sembra corretto inserire l'abbreviazione Loc. come si scrive l'indirizzo postale.
canfe (2026-04-12 06:50:42+00:00): Se non c'è Sul nodo di quel gruppo di case non ci deve neanche essere sull'indirizzo delle singole abitazioni.
Colombari non ha un "prefisso" che io sappia. Pertanto potrebbe essere frazione, borgo, tetti...
Per le abbreviazioni trovi sulla wiki che dice di non usarle.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Nomi#Abbreviazioni
Map47 (2026-04-12 08:12:25+00:00): Ok. Allora sul nodo andrebbe specificato Località Colombari.
canfe (2026-04-13 14:27:18+00:00): Vero, ma non c'è "località" da nessuna parte.
eggie (2026-03-22 12:19:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2026-03-22 12:09:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 11 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1491452205 v1 | 4 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180246235
ieguy3 (2026-03-22 12:14:13+00:00): https://www.gob.mx/amlo/prensa/en-sinaloa-presidente-inaugura-tramo-carretero-de-140-km-comunica-sinaloa-con-chihuahua
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-22 14:28:23+00:00): Hi, again,

I saw that several name:* tags were removed. Could you explain why those were deleted?

Thanks.
Dodko (2026-04-20 08:58:51+00:00): Na otvárací čas použi https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ neurobíš potom preklep
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032087139/history
1Mmarek (2026-04-20 09:13:13+00:00): uuu, to je výborný nástroj, ďakujem!!!
eggie (2026-03-22 13:20:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
bdentremont (2026-03-22 15:13:24+00:00): Thanks for catching this.  Welcome to OSM.

In follow up to your edit, I've also marked the road segment which is actual bridge as bridge=yes, layer=1 (indicating the road is above the ground and the creek).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1491504103
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Dimacn (2026-03-22 15:01:21+00:00): Пожалуйста, пользуйтесь спутниковыми снимками Esri - они значительное свежее и точнее, чем Bing, которым пользовались вы.
eggie (2026-03-22 13:31:30+00:00): Dag Martienos.. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande  adresnode.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-22 21:25:14+00:00): Dag  Bendinko,

Lijkt me oke zo.
Gr eggie
Vinber-Pro (2026-06-11 13:58:43+00:00): Salut,
tu y a touché donc je te pose la question que j'ai posé ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180096769

c'est plutôt un parc non https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1490476734 / peut-être continuer la discussion sur le changeset initial ?

à plus
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-22 14:26:43+00:00): Hi,

I noticed that the name tag for this river was changed from "Грузька" to "река Грузская". Could you please clarify the reasoning behind this change?

Also, I saw that several name:* tags were removed. Could you explain why those were deleted?

Thanks.
eggie (2026-03-22 13:22:14+00:00): Dag T7luR3JTjL,

In dar geval de winkeltags verwijderen van de adresnode. evt shop=vacant taggen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-22 13:37:36+00:00): Als bovenstaand aangepast
T7luR3JTjL (2026-03-22 13:46:35+00:00): Ok, bedankt
eggie (2026-03-22 13:24:58+00:00): Dag Willem,

Wanneer het hier niet toegankelijk is is de tag access=private voldoende.

MVG
eggie
NiedernhausenerJunge (2026-04-14 15:23:29+00:00): Du musst den Weg schon mit der Straße verbinden, damit er fürs Routing genutzt werden kann.
uvi (2026-03-26 04:22:06+00:00): Hallo Dorfverein Mulda,
welcher Fleischer ist jetzt hier? Kannst du den Namen ergänzen oder steht das Geschäft leer? In diesem Falle: "disused:shop=butcher" oder "shop=vacant"
VG Uwe
iandees (2026-03-22 14:44:11+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13141775293 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180254534, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:08:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
ManuelB701 (2026-07-29 06:13:00+00:00): Nur so zu Info, highway=busway heißt nicht einfach so eine Straße, die mit einem Zeichen 245 gekennzeichnet sind, sondern speziell eine Verkehrsader (die übrigens auch nicht mit einem 245-er gekennzeichnet sein müssen).
Zufahrtswege sind immer noch Zufahrtswege egal des Zeichens (in dem Falls als Filter, dass dort keine Autos entlangfahren dürfen) und hier highway=busway zu nutzen ist ähnlich wie die Nutzung von highway=residential für Parkplätze.

In den Foren gibt es dazu auch noch einige Diskussionen wie z.B. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bussonderfahrstreifen-zeichen-245/120377
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:09:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:12:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
delineatorix (2026-04-08 10:28:24+00:00): Hallo fmc-Team,
hier bzw. ursprünglich im Änderungssatz #178108246 scheint euch ein Fehler unterlaufen zu sein: access=no ist nicht korrekt. Bitte überprüft mal, wie es dazu gekommen ist und ob noch weitere Objekte (aus #178108246) betroffen sind.
Schöne Grüße
delineatorix
fmc_5 (2026-04-14 09:25:56+00:00): Es handelt sich um einen Parkplatz, der ausschließlich für PKW bestimmt ist.
Daher "access=no" kein genereller Zugang für alle Fahrzeuge und "motorcar=designated" um die zweckbestimmung für PKW anzuzeigen
JakovRajić (2026-03-24 10:58:37+00:00): Wrong tags fixed in changeset/180347480
ljc_jlyb (2026-03-22 14:18:51+00:00): 动关系标签也会影响到bbox啊（
JakovRajić (2026-03-24 11:02:53+00:00): Wrong tags fixed in changeset/180347726
JakovRajić (2026-03-24 11:06:03+00:00): wrong tags fixed in changeset/180347867
iandees (2026-03-22 14:44:18+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4777107623 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180254538, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
lenny32 (2026-03-23 19:34:51+00:00): Il y avait 2A, 2B et 2C et maintenant 
2A, 2 bis et 2C ça fait bizarre 🤣😂
Hervé TUC (2026-03-31 20:51:40+00:00): Ah la la mais quel idiot je n'y avais pas pensé ! 🤦‍♂️
J'en ai corrigé une grande partie mais s'il en reste dis-moi où et je corrigerai ça
lenny32 (2026-04-01 07:46:29+00:00): Ne te flagelle pas, j'aurais pu faire pareil !!! 
Je n'en ai pas trouvé d'autres, tu as corrigé ceux que j'avais trouvés
mueschel (2026-03-27 11:31:52+00:00): Hi,
there are 7 streets that got a strange "Toravel" tag, could you check that? 
e.g. http://osm.org/way/39520574
Dren ar Frankig (2026-04-04 11:50:27+00:00): It's a mistake, should have been "name:br". Thank you for notifying me
eggie (2026-03-22 15:53:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  De toegangsre chten zijn nu volkomen verwarrend. Het was al getagd met
access:conditional= no @ (Sep 15-Dec 24; sunset-sunrise)
en
foot:conditional=no @ (Sep 15-Dec 24; sunset-sunrise

In het geval van een totaalverbod horen die conditionaltags toch niet meer in de tagging?


MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
EJFre (2026-04-23 10:51:48+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Bedankt voor de feedback, je hebt gelijk de conditionals horen hier inderdaad niet meer.
limes11 (2026-07-27 21:16:59+00:00): Hallo

kannst du mal bitte auf diesen Hinweis schauen ? Du hattest diesen Weg vor kurzem angepasst:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5421176#map=15/49.02998/9.22987&layers=N

Danke
JakovRajić (2026-03-24 11:08:22+00:00): Wrong tags fixed in changeset/180347973