piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mwro (2026-05-30 19:05:51+00:00): Moja pierwsza edycja w JOSM. Chętnie przyjmę wszelkie uwagi i konstruktywną krytykę, bez taryfy ulgowej. Sugestie mile widziane :)
AgusQui (2026-06-12 14:37:11+00:00): Por favor podés dejar de hacer ediciones tontas como cambiar un Todomoda a tienda de ropa que no lo es o agregar la palabra "banco" a un Santander
YBau (2026-05-30 19:28:28+00:00): J'ai fait ces modifications : 
Qualification de la zone en amenity=traffic_park : Voir le wiki, cette attraction correspond exactement à la définition.
suppression de attraction=car : non documenté et déjà amenity=traffic_park
Modification de highway=raceway --> cycleway : ce qui est sûr c'est que ces routes ne sont pas dédiées à la course. Le wiki donne en exemple un traffic_park dont les voies sont des cycleway. Ca ne correspond pas exactement à l'attraction et j'imagine qu'une requalification en unclassified est aussi possible.
finrik (2026-05-31 09:23:33+00:00): Kann diesen Eintrag jemand bitte löschen. Das Programm hat den Eintrag an die falsch Stelle gesetzt.

Hinweis war von hier (Nr: 5318264):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5318264#map=17/48.161241/15.369294&layers=S
Luzandro (2026-06-01 09:29:43+00:00): CS rückgängig gemacht
MarcoR (2026-05-31 07:10:09+00:00): Ciao e benvenuti su OpenStreetMap!

Sembra che tu abbia disegnato un percorso da via Cavour a Piazza Buonamici sovrapponendolo alle strade e piazze che già erano presenti. 

Cosa cercavi di fare?
zerocinquanta (2026-05-31 08:47:23+00:00): Disegnare un percorso turistico per un'iniziativa locale.
MarcoR (2026-05-31 10:10:49+00:00): Grazie per la risposta!

Se si tratta di un percorso temporaneo purtroppo è contro le linee guida (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_practice#Non_mappare_eventi_e_caratteristiche_temporanee).

Se si tratta di un percorso turistico permanente (anche in fase di pianificazione) dovresti usare delle relazioni che sono in pratica dei raccoglitori di percorsi (way in inglese).

Vedi ad esempio:
1. Sentiero Matilde relation/7758054
2. Il cammino di San Jacopo relation/12892724

Mappare delle relazioni con l'editor web credo che sia un po' complicato (se non hai problemi con i programmi scritti in JAVA ti consiglierei di passare a JOSM).

Buon mapping,
Marco
zerocinquanta (2026-05-31 17:16:54+00:00): Grazie. Quello che cercavo, suggeritomi dall'IA, era una base mappale su cui aggiungere un percorso e poi esportare il tutto. Ammetto di non conoscere il progetto né di aver pensato di generare confusione. Se mi dici come fare, cancello volentieri il mio contributo.
Grazie.
MarcoR (2026-05-31 20:30:30+00:00): Se ti serve solo il percorso in un formato standard puoi usare un router tipo: https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=43.716421%2C10.403658&point=43.719822%2C10.398905&profile=foot&layer=Omniscale

Se vuoi ottenere una mappa interattiva con dei percorsi e icone scelti da te puoi provar econ uMap (vedi questo esempio di prova: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/it/map/sentiero-pedemonte-prova_834784)

Non ti preoccupare troppo per il tuo errore: tutto può essere annullato basta accorgersene subito :)

Nei prossimi minuti procedo con l'annullamento della tua modifica.

Buon mapping,
Marco.
MarcoR (2026-05-31 20:36:53+00:00): Questo changeset è stato correttamente annullato

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183465761
zerocinquanta (2026-06-01 09:38:21+00:00): Grazie mille, buon lavoro
yelisey90 (2026-05-31 19:10:13+00:00): Maybe a neighbourhood should be created instead? At least as a node
Khidistavi (2026-05-31 20:47:36+00:00): It's already mapped:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14935821
jimkats (2026-06-27 17:45:35+00:00): I see that even in this changeset, you snapped the substation area to the road. After your reply to my other comment, I hope you stop snapping the areas and the landuses to the road, because exactly that's a bad practice, and it also presents fake data, in terms of the size of a land (there are software which calculate area sizes based on the outline, imagine one calculating the substation or the airfield with area larger than the actual, only because ppl snap them onto the road and not where the end is visible on the imagery).

I know you already apologized and tried to fix the airfield issue, but it's indeed an inconvenience trying to fix all the snapping you did, not so much to fit the area where it actually is, but mostly to unsnap all the nodes, without affecting other nodes.
JJIglesias (2026-06-01 20:54:35+00:00): Por favor envianos la ubicacion y todos los datos de tu restaurante para agregarlo al mapa.

gracias
Annyyop (2026-06-02 16:56:04+00:00): Muchas gracias 🙏🏻🙏🏻, el nombre del restaurante es Innamorata , su dirección es Ave Luis Suárez Saavedra Este 8625 , Remanso 1, Zona Norte, Santa Cruz, muchas gracias una vez más 🙏🏻 🙏🏻
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-31 09:56:46+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is this name real?
turn left on Beachside Drive (2904603818), v2
jcnl44 (2026-05-30 22:40:24+00:00): Bonjour,
Je m'interroge sur 2 POI que vous avez renommé dans ce changeset : 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1087252790 que vous avez nommé avec des caractères non-latin. En regardant leur site web, je vois bien noté Ptéah partout pourtant, d'où vient le name que vous avez renseigné ?

- Idem pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1087252890 qui est bien nommé Malis (cf leurs réseaux sociaux par exemple: https://www.instagram.com/malis.nantes/). D'où vient le name que vous avez changé ?
nihombashi19 (2026-06-01 15:43:11+00:00): C'est indiqué à l'intérieur.
Mais sûrement est-il plus approprié de garder le nom francisé en name et de mettre le nom khmer dans le tag dédié ; n'hésitez pas à améliorer si besoin.
Je le fais de suite.
Taya_S (2026-05-31 05:57:16+00:00): You're still doing the phone number format incorrectly. This is starting to become impressively incompetent.
Taya_S (2026-05-31 05:57:57+00:00): Please start using sensible changeset descriptions. You've been tod this before. This incomprehensible string of literally all tags you're trying to add (that gets cut-off mind you) is not it.
Taya_S (2026-05-31 06:00:26+00:00): Whats with the differing alphabets for the addresses? In this changeset you're using arabic, but in another you're using an english transliteration? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183416178

I think this issue was pointed out before, wasn't it?
Taya_S (2026-05-31 06:01:21+00:00): That contact:instagram link doesn't appear to be valid.
fortera_au (2026-06-01 00:38:15+00:00): Hi, if that is a driveway, it should probably be changed to highway=service and service=driveway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183417605
Ballpoint (2026-06-01 07:05:46+00:00): Thanks! I wasn't 100% sure on how to handle it so made it private, I'll change it to driveway when I jump on the computer tonight. Thanks again! (Also yay! Didn't know driveway was actually an option, learned something new today).
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-30 21:13:28+00:00): Revert of changeset 166589761

https://osm.org/changeset/166589761
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-11 19:57:36+00:00): (Testing the earlier OSM revert tool on one of the SEO changesets I had to revert)
lukabułka (2026-05-31 23:30:19+00:00): mniejsze zagajniki proszę oznaczać jako natural=wood, nie jako landuse=forest. landuse=forest jest tylko dla większych lasów
eteb3 (2026-05-30 21:36:45+00:00): missing source: aerial imagery
felipeeugenio (2026-05-31 12:23:36+00:00): Hello. One thing is to portray the names as they are known in other languages, but translate them as names to other language is not the idea. You are just making descriptions. Nobody refers to Los Angeles as the Angels. 
Translating mapugundun and Pois in chile is, at beat a use for another tag, not name:en= Those are simply not the names.

For automated editions please engage the chilean community in Telegram.

regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183419716
A7K3B (2026-05-31 16:18:08+00:00): felipeeugenio,

First, I understand and apologize, I'll stop immediately. That you for speaking excellent english where I am ignorant of Spanish.

However I would like to explain my intent:

A map name can do three things:
1. Identify the place as designated in the world
2. Represent how a language community refers to it
3. Explain what the name means

In my observation, 2. is uncommon, 1. is the legal object, and 3. is an often desperately needed, ommited rendering into which 2. is easily included.

These are not automated; I've selected various translation options and chosen the best to represent the local language meaning. I have been trying to translate place names in my home region, Colorado, EEUU. If you set the map language to say, Japanese, it is immediately apparent that the region is simply illegible to a Japanese speaker. At best they recognize the latin script and the sounds, but the names themselves are meaningless.

The `name=` tag of course should remain the principal, actual, legal on-the-ground name. However, `name=lang` tags can be a pathway to make regions meaningful to foreign speakers. To translate the map as though a book.

name:<lang> should not be limited to attested exonyms. It should contain the best reader-facing equivalent of the feature’s name in that language, while name=* preserves the actual local designation. Where an attested exonym exists, use it. Where none exists, semantic translation is preferable to opaque transliteration for transparently meaningful names.

What renderers (ex. CoMaps) do is allow individuals to set their language, and then show them the map in their language. However, they always will reveal the true `name=` of the Point of Interest.

I was toying with Malalcahuello because it is analogous to my own home and I was interested to see what the reverse of my intent would be.

I understand that "The Angels" would be absurd, but most of the world is not well known, globalized, and pre-contextualized. Most of it is small towns in the mountains that are voids of meaning to most of mankind.

A7K3B
felipeeugenio (2026-05-31 21:11:09+00:00): Hello, Thanks for your response. I showed your edition to other mappers and they told me that a correct use of what your are doing is take Río Claro and add Claro River if you want to help, even thou the correct use of the name:xx tag is to add how a place is called in another languaje, not to help people with words.
Curicó is a city in Chile which means Aguas Negras (spanish). 0 people in history have called Curicó Aguas Negras.
I took back your editions and maintaines the Malalcahuello :arn name. I have never heard that name, but according to internet, it exist.

regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183419716
Piagno (2026-06-04 17:08:06+00:00): when you are mass "fixmeing" please check the relations sourounding as well. There are multiple stations already mapped, but not included in the relations
9_tab (2026-06-06 10:06:53+00:00): Thanks, a good point. Your experience is helpful.

I try to add existing stations to relations, but I don’t always finish every step in one pass. Based on the 2009 model, common tasks fixing stations are:

1. Create missing station nodes  

2. Add those nodes to the appropriate relation. Some stations are present, but hard to find given a lack of tags.

3. Set each member’s role to "station" in the relation  

4. Fix typos/spelling in names (e.g., “Parcours”)  

5. Convert stations mapped as part of a way into standalone nodes where appropriate  

6. Ensure basic tags exist (at minimum ref= for the station number)  

7. Add a complete, consistent tag set per current tagging guidance

My current practice: I place a fixme when nodes or relation membership are missing, and I typically resolve items 2–4 during follow-up edits.



For everyone who wants to pitch in, here are small, concrete ways to help (no deep knowledge required):

- Create a node for a missing station and add ref=
  
- Add existing station nodes to the correct relation and set role=station  

- Split a station out of a way into a node when appropriate 
 
- Correct names (fix “Parcours”) and add basic tags (ref=, etc)
  
- If unsure, leave a short changeset comment or a fixme tag describing what’s left

If a whole parcours is missing, a good first contribution is a node at the approximate start plus a relation for the parcours.



Tools:

- Overpass examples: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:network=Vitaparcours  if some stations aren’t found with that, please mention them or add them directly to relations. The larger clusters of nodes that only have a name, but aren't marked as fitness_station should be done. https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2raU focuses on easier ones.



If you’re willing to coordinate: reply with an area or relation id you’re working on and I’ll prioritize that in my next pass. 

If useful for newer contributors, I can also paste a minimal tag set to use.
Taktaal (2026-06-20 16:56:50+00:00): Please don't use AI to write communications for you, it's really rude towards others.
9_tab (2026-06-20 18:47:48+00:00): @Taktaal: This seems to be unrelated to this changeset or its discussion. Is there anything of substance you want to say about this changeset or its discussion? On a side node: are you frequently being told that you are rude?
Taktaal (2026-06-20 20:40:44+00:00): I used the word "Please". I can also be less nice.

If you want to contribute to a project, follow basic rules such as treating other members with respect. Letting AI write your texts for you is disrespectful and not conductive to collaboration.

Also, follow project rules. For Openstreetmap, automated edits are not allowed unless discussed before. Refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits . If you discussed this mass edit somewhere, you need to put the link in the changeset comment.
9_tab (2026-06-20 21:03:56+00:00): The edit wasn't automated, but maybe it falls in an OSM category of "automated edits". I will check.

On the side note: I'm still curious: Are you frequently being told that you are rude?

It would be helpful for myself and other readers if you made a substantive argument about this discussion. Are there points in my initial response that you find are not clear? Please do use spellchecker and AI if you can't make it without. I added the list of fixes for stations to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Parcoursvita#Fixes_for_stations . Please help improve it.
GartenStuhl (2026-06-21 06:16:36+00:00): @9_tab
this: "On the side note: I'm still curious: Are you frequently being told that you are rude?"
is actually: "... unrelated to this changeset or its discussion."
so dont ask again, Taktaal already explained it to you. And again, stop letting AI write comments completely or just disable this agent. Thanks.
9_tab (2026-06-21 10:04:51+00:00): @GartenStuhl: it's a way Taktaal made their argument (indeed unrelated to my original response) and re-reading it, you are right, what they wrote could be understood as yes. So we can close that point.

To your other point: I don't let AI answer on my behalf. Also, this was not an "automated edit". Both accusations should not be repeated. Can we hear if there was any issue with the content of my original response? If don't want to participate fixing these relations, maybe you are just in the wrong CS.
Taktaal (2026-06-21 11:09:05+00:00): I recommend not reflexively lying when people catch you doing something bad. Social interactions don't work like a courtroom where people will say that they can't prove 100% what you did, therefore you are innocent. Instead they will form an opinion of you and this will shape your future interactions with everybody.
9_tab (2026-06-21 11:23:16+00:00): I'm sorry you feel that way. 

Please avoid blindly repeating to others what you may have heard about your own approach. 

If you lecture people about rules, you should know why you do so.
SomeoneElse (2026-07-17 16:26:11+00:00): @9_tab People are trying to help you.  Please listen and take their advice.

Only you can change the way that you are perceived in the OSM community by changing the way that you interact with people.  It doesn't matter if you believe that you are completely blameless; they have formed an impression based on what you have said and done, and you can change that by saying and doing things differently in the future.

Best Regards,

Andy (from the DWG, following a complaint to the DWG)
9_tab (2026-07-20 21:21:37+00:00): @DWG: Please send me by internal message the relations that need fixing. Thanks.
SomeoneElse (2026-07-20 22:14:10+00:00): @9_tab: The "relations that need fixing" are the ones between you and your fellow mappers.
9_tab (2026-07-20 22:20:25+00:00): Good to hear: at least we agree on the mapping.

Happy Mapping.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-30 22:31:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3180368422
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651506388

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
uknown-gryphus (2026-06-25 16:21:55+00:00): Hi, this changeset seems to be underexplained. This road is a National Highway, and thus should be classified as highway=trunk + motorroad=yes. This is how it was before, could you explain why this change was made?

Highway classifications for reference https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Tags/Highway
mueschel (2026-05-31 17:05:44+00:00): Hi,
you added an "NWI_ID" tag here that looks like it shouldn't be in OSM. Could you check that?
cgreggescalante (2026-05-31 20:58:10+00:00): Ah, thanks for the review. I have removed that tag from my contributions in the area
MapperrZPolski (2026-05-31 20:00:19+00:00): Czy skoro droga jest równie ważna co 3 Maja to, obie nie powinny mieć tej samej kategorii (czytaj: obie tertialy, lub obie unclassified)?
Paweł_M (2026-06-01 16:18:45+00:00): Zrobiłem tak z kilku powodów:
- z tego co czytałem kiedyś na wiki lub forum zmiana kategorii na tertiary lub powyżej powinna być przedyskutowana, a na ten moment tego nie zrobiłem
- ale też osobiście nie uważam, aby ta droga była tak ważna aby dać jej tertiary. unclassified wystarczy, bo ludzie używają jej albo jako dojazdu do DK77, albo jako dojazdu do Nowej Wsi (ulica Nowowiejska) z DK77. Ulica Nowowiejska jest jest unclassified
- no i zastanawiam się czy 3 Maja jako tertiary to nie jest za duża klasyfikacja, to raczej swego rodzaju droga łącznik Mickiewicza z DK77
Nie chciałem więc podnosić ul. Nowe Osiedle do tertiary, bo może wkrótce byłoby zbite do unclassified. Muszę to sobie przemyśleć jak to wygląda w terenie oraz jak wyglądają inne drogi tertiary w okolicy i przegadać z innymi.
MapperrZPolski (2026-06-01 17:11:47+00:00): myśle, że ulica 3 Maja nie zasługuje na teritialy i skłaniałbym się w stronę obniżenia kategorii tej ulicy, a nie podwyższania ul. Nowe Osiedle
jmarchon (2026-05-31 04:07:49+00:00): Welcome back to OSM!
cryptickryptos (2026-05-30 22:31:31+00:00): colston ave not st stephen st, but same idea regardless
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-16 11:42:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 184177657, 184177648, 184177681, 184177679, 184177677, 184177691, 184177627, 184177660, 184177591, 184177688, 184177670, 184177664, 184177695 where the changeset comment is: revert edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20792
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-06-04 10:29:13+00:00): Moin otto07,

gebe doch bitte ein Kommentar an, damit nach nachvollziehen kann, was Du gemacht hast.

So eine flächendeckende Änderung von Kirchen sieht auch sehr verdächtig nach einer Massenänderung aus, die zuvor mit der Community besprochen werden sollte.

Angaben zu Religion und Konfession bekommt man auch nicht aus den von Dir angegeben Quellen.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
t_ja (2026-05-31 09:27:15+00:00): Ahoj,
po tvojej zmene je teraz parkovanie pre bicykle umiestnene u niekoho v zahrade: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2405373555
Nie je to omyl? Povodne bolo umiestnene pri terase krcmy, co dava vacsi zmysel.
Cr33pY (2026-05-31 10:20:05+00:00): Ahoj,
ďakujem za upozornenie, pravdepodobne omylom som posunul toto parkovisko, vďaka za upozornenie, chyba je už opravená.
silversurfer83 (2026-05-31 18:06:20+00:00): Moin Jonas :)

kleiner Hinweis: Wir versuchen den Firmennamen einmal an ein Objekt zu hängen wo es am sinnvollsten ist. idR ist das entweder das *gesamte* Firmengelände oder ein Punkt mit allen relevanten Firmeninfos. Ihn an jedes Gebäude zu hängen ist die ungünstigste Variante.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183421239
Leo Slager (2026-05-31 13:25:19+00:00): Hier gaat wel het een en ander mis.
De editor iD geeft je hier 4 foutmeldingen. Die zou je toch moeten nalopen om de fouten te herstellen.
Verder zijn op de kruising Randweg-West/Halsterseweg alle routerelaties beschadigd.
De nieuwe afslaande ways zijn niet met elkaar verbonden en de bijbehorende afsla restrictions zijn niet aangebracht.
Ik zal dat herstellen.

Verder beslaat de changset een veel te groot gebied en dat maakt controle op fouten erg moeilijk.
Het is dus beter om een changset te beperken tot een gebied van enkele straten, daarna uploaden naar de server, de kaart vgerschuiven en een nieuwe changset openen.

Nu moet ik maar liefst 150 items op fouten gaan controleren.
Leo Slager (2026-05-31 13:49:28+00:00): foot=yes is een default op een highway=service,
Dat hoef je dus niet bij te taggen.

oneway=no is een default waarde voor alle ways.
Dat hoef je dus niet te taggen.

Waarom de bromfietsdoorsteek verwijderen van de kaart en vervangen door een fietspad, wat sowieso onjuist is, fietsers mogen daar niet rijden ! En alle info die op de oude way was getagd is verloren gegaan.

De footway bij de buurtweg is niet vastgemaakt aan de fietspaden. Zo kan er dus geen route over gepland worden.

Wel, alle begin is moeilijk, het is een oerwoud aan regeltjes en NL als fietsland bij uitstek heeft er nog eens extra aan toegevoegd.

Laat dat je niet ontmoedigen om verder te mappen. Probeer eerst het onderwerp op te zoeken in de wiki of kijk hoe ervaren mappers een identiek item gemapt hebben.

We nemen je ook niets kwalijk. De aanwijzingen hierboven zijn er om er van te leren.

Groet
Leo
TheSwavu (2026-05-31 06:33:00+00:00): This changeset (along with  183422279, 183422409, 183422436, and 183422453) has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183427456 as it broke a number of administrative boundaries.

Please don't randomly delete things.

Thank you.
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-31 09:54:42+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Is the name real?
Crown waterways are not roads (1302161038), v4
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-31 09:55:30+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183427456
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-31 09:55:48+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183427456
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-31 09:56:08+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183427456
AndyB_66 (2026-06-05 08:49:04+00:00): To nie jest dobry komentarz zestawu zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
dmjab13 (2026-06-01 19:31:55+00:00): please do not submit changesets that span entire continents like this, submit it in smaller regions
m_fuhrmann (2026-05-31 12:04:23+00:00): Hi! Du kannst in den Öffnungszeiten noch eintragen wann der Laden geschlossen hat. Dann funktioniert in vielen Tools dieses "öffnet am Montag wieder" Feature.

Z.B. "Mo-Fr 08:00-17:00, Sa,Su,PH off"

Kein Drama wenn es nicht mit drin ist, Ich habe es mir angewöhnt mit einzupflegen.