piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aseidel (2023-07-05 13:59:43+00:00): Liebe:r Toni Leffers,
bitte bei den benutzungspflichtigen Radwegen immer auch traffic_sign=* an der Linie mit angeben.
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
seav (2023-12-30 03:40:26+00:00): Hi! You mistagged the wrong Immaculate Concepcion church in Bulacan as a minor basilica. It is the church in Malolos that is the minor basilica (already tagged), not the one in Santa Maria.
seav (2023-12-30 05:13:04+00:00): I apologize. I missed the news that the church had been declared a minor basilica in 2021. Sorry!
gendy54 (2023-12-30 20:01:51+00:00): No problem ;)
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-29 14:50:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240878369
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240877911

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2023-05-31 04:49:07+00:00): Hello.
Why do you have ' around opening_hours= value?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136704201
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-29 00:17:56+00:00): Interesting name for the beach...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136705327
jfd553 (2023-06-04 14:32:45+00:00): Merci Boff II !
Je ne sais pas si c’est un adon, mais tu sembles avoir réparé une section de la route verte que j’avais accidentellement brisée, sans savoir sa localisation exacte (pour la réparer). 
Cool !
Frans S (2023-06-02 13:03:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please don't split tasks with hardly objects to map.
Splitting a task is useful in areas with lots of objects. It helps to limit the time to map a task and restrict the amount of mappings.
btw, despite you have split this task, you overlooked some buildings.
Best regards
dieterdreist (2025-03-13 14:53:43+00:00): Ciao, ho notato che hai inserito delle piccole linee di elettricità come power=cable e i supporti come power=tower. Guardando le foto aerei, mi sembrano power=pole i supporti e power=minor_line le linee. Non conosco la situazione nel luogo, per questo ti chiedo. Ad esempio qui: node 10937124259 oppure qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971110528

power=cable sono i cavi isolati, al solito soterranei, è questo che c'è?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:power%3Dcable

Ciao
Martin
jaap de vries (2023-06-02 07:42:41+00:00): Jasper ik merk op dat dit bewerkingsgebied wel heel groot is van Leerdam tot Duiven aan toe, let je even op een volgende keer?
jxpsert (2023-06-02 07:44:32+00:00): Ah, is het beter om voor elke post een aparte changeset te maken?
eggie (2023-05-29 15:57:03+00:00): Lijkt me oke..
Ik heb name:nl verwijderd. Dat hoeft niet in het Nederlandse taalgebied... in Friesland bv is het wel weer nuttig. 
De tagging taal is UK English  dus =schaken:chess vervangen door chess.
Alleen dan zal het hoop ik een keer gaan renderen, maar dat is aan de 'mannen' van Carto. 
gr eggie
ivanbranco (2024-04-18 17:31:59+00:00): Ciao igi77,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10926815401/history/2

sei sicuro che questo albero sia Eriobotrya japonica? Wikipedia dice sia un albero sempreverde
igi77 (2024-04-18 17:49:17+00:00): No, modifica inavvertita, rimuovo la specie.
kapazao (2023-05-31 05:53:44+00:00): Hola, deberías revisar los terrenos añadidos en este conjunto de cambios. No sé por qué pusiste como olivos la mayoría cuando son tierras de cultivo.
Por otra parte los caminos de asfalto se etiquetan como highway=track + tracktype=grade1 + surface=asphalt y no como carreteras.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136706197
lololailo (2023-05-31 09:33:25+00:00): Hola, los terrenos añadidos no son tierras de cultivo sino olivares, yo he pasado por ahí y te lo puedo confirmar, son cultivos en hileras y no como el clásico olivar. En cuando a los caminos los he clasificado como unclassified ya que son caminos que suelen unir  caserios, pequeñas aldeas o parajes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136706197
aseidel (2023-05-31 14:55:59+00:00): Liebe:r Toni Leffers,
bzgl. des class:bicycle-Tags bitte nochmal auf die Ausfüllhilfe schauen: unbefestigte Wege (tracktype=grade4 und schlechter) bitte nicht bewerten (ggf. per description=* beschreiben, warum der Weg trotzdem schön ist).
Danke und lieben Gruß
Antje Seidel 
#lgmaps
Edelsalami (2023-05-29 20:47:53+00:00): Hi TheFive, kann es sein, dass dir bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1060548535ein Fehler unterlaufen ist? Der Weg ist deutlich als Fahrradstreifen zu erkennen und ist damit kein fußweg. Fußgänger müssten auf der Straße laufen. Gruß
TheFive (2023-05-30 07:27:50+00:00): Eigentlich nicht. Ich bezieh mich auf Schilder nicht auf Luftbilder
Edelsalami (2023-05-30 11:14:14+00:00): Dann kannst du mir sicher erklären wie ein Schild aussieht, dass Fußgänger dazu auffordert neben Autos auf der Straße zu laufen und an einer Ampel für PKWs zu warten?
TheFive (2023-06-06 05:07:44+00:00): Du hst recht. 

evtl ist der zurückerollte zustand nicht ganz so schlimm wie der aktuelle.

Auf dem Stück ist da ein stück strassenbegleitender radweg ( ich vermute der benözätigt keine blauen fahrradschilder.

die weiterführung des radwegs ist dann seit 2 jahren radfahrer frei, hier wurde endlich die stvo umgesetzt.
NieWnen (2025-02-16 22:27:54+00:00): Proszę, nie klikaj na oślep w to co id proponuje.
Dodałeś tagi z Grodziska Mazowieckiego do stacji rowerowej w Zielonej Górze.
Michael_H (2023-05-29 20:16:24+00:00): Hi mpsupertramp,
A miniature golf area is a miniature golf area. I don't see a benefit why this should be in addition a tourist attraction.
mpsupertramp (2023-05-30 18:48:17+00:00): I would have loved to mark it as a miniature golf area IF THERE WAS AN OPTION to mark it as a miniature golf area on maps.me 😉
Michael_H (2023-05-30 19:16:06+00:00): Maybe you should use a better editor. The area was already in the map.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365609190
 I removed your POI again.
map per (2023-05-30 19:37:28+00:00): The maps.me App is not a good for editing OpenStreetMaps data. I would recomend the ID editor. You can find out more about OpenStreetMaps here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/About_OpenStreetMap

And by the way: There is a furtherdevelopment of Maps.me called Organic Maps (privacy focused, improved map and no crypto nonsese)
jtracey (2023-05-29 18:58:14+00:00): It's fine in this case, but generally speaking: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-17 04:06:01+00:00): Landuse/Landcover and roads should not be snapped to power lines.  I have cleaned up the portion by the golf course.
MxxCon (2023-05-31 04:53:50+00:00): Please note that review_requested= is not a valid tag. It should not be used.
You should use fixme=* tag and indicate what exactly needs to be addressed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136707355
map per (2023-05-30 18:02:19+00:00): Hello Gernot Reichleitner,

is this car_parts shop you added (1) really called "h y m"? That sounds like a strange name.

Thanks and best regards
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10937200905
map per (2023-06-13 08:54:22+00:00): Hello Gernot Reichleitner,

is this car_parts shop (1) you uploaded to the public OpenStreetMaps database (see (2)) really called "h y m"? That sounds like a strange name.

Thanks and best regards
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10937200905
(2) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/About_OpenStreetMap
NKA (2023-05-30 06:19:36+00:00): Det er ikke nødvendig å legge til lanes=* som er standard/default, dvs. ikke lanes=2 for vanlig vei og lanes=1 for enveiskjørt vei. Ingen av oppdateringene her ser ut til å være nødvendige.
user_6471069 (2023-07-22 12:10:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550091796
dlaczego tutaj zmieniono highway=path na footway? to jest ciąg pieszo-rowerowy więc path jest zasadne.
archpdx (2023-08-12 21:11:24+00:00): As others have mentioned, highways of the same classification "should collectively form a coherent network of interconnected roads, without dangling spurs or 'islands' of disconnected roads" (see https://wiki.osm.org/United_States/Highway_classification). Please keep this in mind when making any future highway classification changes.
Fresno map (2023-08-14 19:00:55+00:00): Hello archpdx,
Thank you for reviewing my erronous highway tags. I understand now that highway tags should not include "islands". In your opinon, should the segement of Millerton Road between the town of Friant and Winchell Cove Road be marked as Highway=Primary since it is a road which provides connectivity to minor population centers? The lowest maxspeed on this route is a speed limit of 40 mph.
archpdx (2023-08-15 01:05:42+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your response. In my opinion, I think that Millerton should be secondary. While this road does connect to the casino and surrounding neighborhoods, I would consider minor population centers to be towns like Oakhurst that have more amenities such as schools, libraries, supermarkets, etc
Fresno map (2023-08-15 19:39:17+00:00): Thank you, that makes sense! I think you could change this road segment to highway=secondary if you wish.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-29 16:20:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10937220507
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10937220508

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
lipuma (2023-05-31 11:54:03+00:00): Hi stillhart,

On this charging station you added `payment:apps=yes'. Could you be more specific?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177286473

Here's the wiki page for payments:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:payment:*
stillhart (2023-05-31 18:40:29+00:00): Yeah, that's shitty tagged from me. Sadly I already deleted my pictures from my visit there. Then I would know if twint is covered too. With apps I meant their ewz mobil app with which you can pay. Should that be ewz_mobil?

https://www.ewz.ch/de/geschaeftskunden/elektromobilitaet/unterwegs-laden/oeffentliches-ladenetz.html

https://apps.apple.com/ch/app/ewz-mobil/id1489460706

If that does not fit, I can just delete the attribute to be on the save side.
lipuma (2023-06-30 09:04:17+00:00): Hi, sorry for the late reply.

I'm not sure what the Swiss community uses when tagging places you can use ewz mobile at.

On OSM you can bring your own tags, so tagging it with payment:ewz_mobile or payment:ewz is probably fine.

But, payments:app is also fine for now.
eggie (2023-05-29 18:24:58+00:00): Dag PB
Wanneer daar de ingang zit lijkt het me oke.
level =0 lijkt me default . Dat hoef je niet te taggen.
Wil je het lemaal perfect hebben dan kun je de highway=footway doortrekken naar de ingang. 
Groet
eggie

MVG
eggie
Graptemys (2023-06-06 02:00:46+00:00): Hi IIVQ. This change and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136694495 are very odd. Most of your changes are in Europe but then you made two changesets of 300 random objects across several states and provinces in the US and Canada. Most seem to be tiny geometry updates but some of them look problematic, like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177288580 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10937226756

What is going on with this change and did you import any data?
IIVQ (2023-06-06 06:46:11+00:00): Hi Graptemys,

I made a 3 week trip trought the US and Canada and made notes (Osmand -> Audio note) and GPX recordings along the way, which I then put into OSM on "a rainy saturday". 
The tunnel is an actual closed off tunnel on the Mont Royal. I don't see what's weird about that bench.

All edits are based from my own observations, no data sets involved.

Thx for checking though!
Graptemys (2023-06-06 15:24:38+00:00): Okay! I didn't think it could have been from a survey because of the huge area covered. So I had thought maybe it was random items traced from aerial imagery but you obviously could not have seen a bench that way. And I had also thought it might have been an import because so many of the items were about railways.

If you had a three week long railway themed trip that explains everything! Hope it was a good trip. You visited a few places I know well :)
IIVQ (2023-06-06 15:44:31+00:00): Thx for taking the time to do such an elaborate check! 

Sent you a PM with more details.
indigomc (2024-05-10 18:41:56+00:00): Some of the 'lakes' added in this changeset, especially around Srinivaspur, (e.g. by Timmasandra, just to NE of the town) are actually plantations of some kind. These need checking out.
totera (2023-05-29 17:28:07+00:00): Ciao Fedc, purtroppo la situazione non è chiara: sul sito Anas la strada è stata reinserita come SS4radd, ma sui segnali di progressiva chilometrica SP235 è stato sostituito con SS4 (senza radd) e successivamente sono comparsi i segnali di inizio e termine strada con SR235... quindi sul terreno SS4radd non compare da nessuna parte
fedc (2023-05-29 18:05:39+00:00): Ciao, l'esperienza insegna che spesso le strade statali che si diramano dalla strada principale (quelle identificate dalle sigle var, racc, radd, eccetera) vengono segnalate con il semplice nome della strada principale.

Il sito stradeanas comunque è affidabile e aggiornato.
totera (2023-07-27 21:33:08+00:00): Sono stati installati numerosi altri cartelli di strada con diritto di precedenza e di obbligo di catene a bordo (questi ultimi anche sulle strade incrocianti) con la sigla SR235, quindi almeno da queste parti l'Anas non adotta sul terreno ciò che scrive sul sito. Tra l'altro il sito della regione (che è proprietaria della strada) riporta una denominazione ancora diversa, SR4. Ad ogni modo, la maggioranza dei cartelli e tutti quelli più recenti usano SR235, quindi ho modificato indicando comunque tutte le alternative.
berndw (2023-05-31 08:00:47+00:00): Hallo willkommen bei OpenStreetMap, vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge.

Ich habe einen Hinweis.

Es gibt zu den diversen Wegtypen Standardwerte, z.B. Zugangsregeln, die nur dann erfasst werden sollten, wenn vor Ort (!) die Beschilderung davon abweicht, hier ein Link dazu.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

Für Fragen stehe ich gerne zur Verfügung
Adrian_N (2023-05-29 18:52:49+00:00): Salut! Pare că ai scos tag-ul heritage:operator=lmi de pe biserică. Conform wiki ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:heritage#Romania ) el trebuie pus împreună cu ref:RO:lmi . S-a schimbat ceva între timp?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-29 17:20:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106911367
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106911425

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kocio (2023-05-29 17:28:10+00:00): Hej, o ile mi wiadomo tam nie ma nazwy ulicy, tylko numer miejscowości.
NorthCrab (2023-05-29 17:32:34+00:00): Poprawiłem addr:city -> addr:place, pozdrawiam!
Damelin (2023-05-30 13:57:52+00:00): Hey, could you please limit the size of your changeset. Here you can find more: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Mariusz256 (2023-06-01 16:49:57+00:00): This changeset was automatically send by Organic Maps app. I can't control the size of change set there. It probably didn't had intenet connection to sent it earlier and this changes accumulated from couple of places I traveled
cyclist789 (2026-03-23 19:59:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177311860
I have reversed this waterway to flow to the southeast, as the surrounding waterways seemed to suggest this.
Nakaner (2023-09-27 10:31:18+00:00): Hallo,

dein Beitrag mag zwar gut gemeint sein, ist aber nicht hilfreich.

Wenn du so wie hier Abbiegeverbote erfasst, geht jeder Datenkonsument und jeder Mapper davon aus, dass sie dauerhaft sind. Die Baustelle ist das aber nicht. Anders als ein highway=construction fällt auch keinem anderen Mapper beim Blick auf die Karte auf, dass da noch Überreste von Baustellen sind, wenn die Baustelle selbst schon Geschichte ist.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nakaner-repair (2023-09-27 10:32:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 141812690 where the changeset comment is: Remove temporary turn restrictions. Nobody will find them when the constructions are finished. Use highway=construction instead.
opendcc (2023-05-30 09:50:35+00:00): Hallo,

es wäre sinnvoll gewesen, die Adressdaten zu erhalten.
jngt (2023-05-30 10:14:04+00:00): Hi, ok, guter Hinweis - ich habe die Adresse nun auf das Gebäude eingetragen. Allerdings wartet in Burgrain wohl noch ganz generell viel Arbeit bzgl. der Adressdaten ... ;-)
Viele Grüße
MxxCon (2023-05-31 04:57:38+00:00): Hello.
Is this value accurate? Satellite imagery doesn't show this to be a dome roof.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136712378
Aradrin (2023-05-31 15:37:27+00:00): It is "kinda" dome shaped. Didn't find the actual form in the wiki. Shall I leave it blank instead?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136712378
MxxCon (2023-05-31 15:57:36+00:00): Unless I'm misreading the satellite imagery, it's still "flat", isn't it? While the glass structure is round, the roof itself is flat, no?
Aradrin (2023-06-01 01:24:01+00:00): Well, not flat, but with an angle. I agree that Dome is not the better answer, but what should we find then? Didn't find any adequate in the wiki :(
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136712378
MxxCon (2023-06-03 04:08:37+00:00): Also another issue I noticed with this specific edit is that the way you edited way 512131350, which is the indoor area. The building itself is way 1104125894. So I removed roof tags from this way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136712378
goedegazelle (2023-05-29 19:02:09+00:00): Het staat er mooi op, Tjuro, maar je moet nog wel een beetje oefenen met het importeren van adressen. ;)
Tjuro (2023-05-29 20:37:19+00:00): oeps, ik had niet helemaal goed gekeken, de adressen zijn er wel 😄
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136717002
goedegazelle (2023-05-29 22:28:48+00:00): Nogmaals bedankt!
wolfgang8741 (2023-07-24 01:14:00+00:00): The preferred imagery in Ohio is OSIP 6 inch as it provides a better alignment and often better resolution. For instance - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177322550 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177322538 don't match the building shape nor orientation. There is a lot of cleanup for this changeset to meet the quality of the nearby areas.
pigsonthewing (2023-07-24 13:01:16+00:00): Noted.

However, OSIP is not available to me (per wiki: "[OSIP] uses a server that is known to block HTTPS connections from outside the United States.")

The alignment of the Maxar imagery which I used was congruent with exiting roads and buildings in the vicinity.

AIUI, it's acceptable to map buildings as rectangles (or other reasonable approximations) when exact shapes cannot be determined.
wolfgang8741 (2023-08-12 13:58:58+00:00): There is a work around for OSIP where the access is blocked geographically https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/issues/1858#issuecomment-1628291713 and the work around notes from a OSM US slack discussion was added to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ohio#Proxy_for_Geo-restricted_Aerial_Imagery . Additionally for Washington County, Ohio as of Aug 11 2023 I've acquired higher resolution imagery and am working to get it hosted by the OSMF.

When I viewed the Maxar imagery (before they removed imagery access) the buildings didn't quite match the shape from what I could see on my monitors.

I didn't find the shapes to be reasonable approximations based on the available imagery, but not to worry. After I get hosting for the 3 inch imagery from 2022, I'm planing to create a mapping challenge in the task manager to review all parts of Washington County, Ohio which should put to rest any issues with buildings. Even buildings I've traced on the OSIP III 6 inch will need adjustment at this resolution.
lipuma (2023-05-31 11:54:54+00:00): Hi, what does `payment:04532428787' mean? Check out the wiki page for payments here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:payment:*
jcr83 (2023-06-02 14:57:46+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez passé la vitesse maximale de plusieurs routes à double sens à 90 km/h. Cela m'étonne, voir cet article de Nice Matin : https://www.nicematin.com/faits-de-societe/on-vous-explique-pourquoi-les-routes-secondaires-des-alpes-maritimes-vont-rester-a-80-kmh-784810
Avez-vous vérifié si des panneaux 90 sont présents sur le terrain ?
Anonix35 (2023-06-02 15:09:31+00:00): En effet, c'est une erreur de ma part.
Ces routes étaient auparavant à 50 sur OSM, ce qui était incorrect aussi. Mais je suis resté sur le fait qu'en France, on roule à 90km/h.
Je vais le corriger.
eggie (2023-05-29 19:03:05+00:00): Hoi  Map what's on the ground is het mooto en dat is wat je hebt gedaan.
Heb wel wat zand gedumpt. ...   zodat de tijdelijke weg niet door het water loopt.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2023-05-29 19:13:29+00:00): Dag Oxan  Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me acceptabel zo.  Zou dat bos niet moeten aansluiten aan het water?
Wanneer je bedoelt dat je pad steeds overal aan vast plakt met editor iD  dan is er een trucje. De linker alttoets gebruiken tijdens intekenen. Dan plakt het niet.
Groet
eggie
Oxan (2023-05-29 19:59:45+00:00): Als ik zie hoe de rest van dat pad is ingetekend, zou het bos denk ik inderdaad moeten aansluiten. Gefixt (en meteen het pad nog iets strakker langs het water ingetekend, dank voor de tip): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136715943
Graptemys (2023-06-08 19:13:02+00:00): Hi zigong, I had moved Iconoglace to the correct location about a month ago, but it seems this change moved it back to the exact same coordinates as it had been previously. Please make sure you are mapping on the most recent data available. Thanks!
zigong (2023-06-09 14:02:34+00:00): Sorry about that. I contribute via android apps (Street complete and Every Door) which I think updates their data regularly. If this happens again, the problem should be reported to these apps teams.
Patr1k_P (2023-06-02 14:32:22+00:00): ahoj, seniku netreba davat nazov, vacsinou sa davaju len nazvy kde je nejaka cedula

..aj tu vymazat https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10937834150
Filip009 (2023-06-04 10:46:59+00:00): A senník sa taguje amenity=feeding_place https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfeeding_place
Patr1k_P (2023-06-04 15:37:52+00:00): ano, to som si ani nevsimol
lyctkel (2023-09-10 21:15:18+00:00): Hi Oxan,
is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10959867442 recycling:pmd=yes just as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10959867
Regards,
lyctkel
Oxan (2023-09-12 17:52:29+00:00): Hi lyctkel,
Your second link got truncated, so I can't answer the specific question. However, the answer is probably yes, I'm afraid I didn't tag all recycling points I added consistently, as I added the first bunch through iD, which doesn't show pmd as an option.
lyctkel (2023-09-14 11:21:01+00:00): Hi Oxam,
Sorry for the incomplete link.
I changed the node to pmd.
Regards,
lyctkel
lipuma (2023-05-31 11:45:35+00:00): Hi, in this changeset you tagged a way as `lir = t':

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83041693

Are you sure this was right? Just a heads up.
felipeeugenio (2023-05-31 11:47:50+00:00): Hello
Lit=yes
just a typo
I´ll correct it

thanks
englu (2023-05-30 07:31:51+00:00): Usunięte zostały ścieżki, ale pozostał zielony szlak turystyczny między Nowinami Hornieckimi a Słotwiną (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2018598). Wg PTTK on istnieje: https://podkarpaciepolnocne.szlaki.pttk.pl/mapa. Czy w terenie nie było żadnych śladów drogi? Wiosną wiele ścieżek zarasta, może lepiej zostawić ścieżkę i dodać trail_visibility=bad? Czy przeszedł Pan całą długość ścieżki 386857111?