piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:22:21+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364378
ssundell (2023-09-12 18:50:15+00:00): Eivätkö nuo Ideaparkin parkkialueen tiet ole suurin piirtein oppikirjaesimerkki service-tyyppisestä tiestä? residential on osa yleistä tie/katuverkkoa ja käytännössä aina nimetty, tässä tapauksessa kyse on kauppakeskuksen piha-alueen teistä, jotka ovat mielestäni nimenomaan service-tyyppisiä.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141175411
Tunturikyy (2023-09-14 17:02:44+00:00): Juu ei ole residential oikea täggäys noille teille. Asia on päivän selvä: liikekeskuksen pihatiet eivät ole asuinalueiden katuja. Miksi tvj olet tehnyt nuo muutokset? Ja voitko korjata ne takaisin?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:22:14+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364375
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:22:07+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364372
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:22:01+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364371
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:21:54+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364370
user_18267930 (2023-09-12 19:18:37+00:00): What does "corrected" mean? Changed according to your taste or is there more behind it? Do you mean to tell that everyone beside you is wrong?
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:21:47+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364369
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:21:34+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364365
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:21:28+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364363
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:21:21+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364362
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:21:13+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364361
Jakka (2023-09-14 07:35:01+00:00): you created a changeset with a large bounding box covering the continent from ..... to ...... This needn't happen and in most cases is kind of bothering the people trying to do some Quality Assurance of the map data. More info here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changes
not_sure_for_now (2023-09-15 22:59:24+00:00): Hello, 
I am not sure how did that happen but basically I was using OrganicMaps iOS app and I added one place the other day and app also asked me to contribute to OpenStreetMap so I just created an account and I assumed app did whatever is needed in the background. 

Anyway, for whatever reason we have something broken I believe. I have two "nodes", I will refer them as two separate location I wanted to contribute. One of them is actually quite old one and the other one is pretty new. However, I created my account recently so both of them sent at the same time so I guess that's the problem? 
> A changeset is a group of edits to the database by a single user over a short period of time
> General recommendation: changesets should be local. 

I will take a look at it tomorrow but meanwhile let me know if you have any suggestions :)
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:21:07+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364360
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:21:02+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364359
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-14 23:19:32+00:00): esse tipo de superficie "terre" não existe
dej_espindola (2023-09-18 14:56:13+00:00): obrigado, foi corrigido
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:56:40+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146013645
CurlingMan13 (2023-09-12 20:33:58+00:00): Do not add features that partially overlap.  This throws error flags.  They should either not overlap, or one area should be wholly within the other.

I have resolved this.  Please avoid this in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141176971
irik (2023-09-15 10:32:53+00:00): A cóż to za wandalizm, pan się bawi w użytkownika interswd?
gscholz (2023-09-14 07:26:50+00:00): Hi  ramonz,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=0.89634&lat=41.24300&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141177310

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-13 02:31:46+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141186709
eggie (2023-09-12 19:38:22+00:00): Dag SK   We tekenen niet zelf gebouwen in, maar periodiek wordt er geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG.
Je kunt dat versnellen door een verzoek te doen op het forum in het draadje BAG importverzoeken.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-12 19:41:52+00:00): Importverzoek loopt https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/1315
eggie (2023-09-15 07:10:24+00:00): Geïmporteerd..  Denk dat het nog niet ingemeten is door het kadaster.. dus ik heb het gebouw iets opgeschoven mbv PDOK 2023. 
MVG
eggie
NKA (2023-09-14 04:22:23+00:00): Du må stoppe disse importene umiddelbart.

De lager et stort antall duplikater og andre feilmeldinger.

Det blir svært vanskelig for oss andre å jobbe med N50 topo på de stedene du har importert.

Det er helt uforståelig at du laster opp slike endringer uten å validere først, eller at du ignorerer feilmeldingene. Du har heller ikke fulgt prosedyrene for topo-importen. Og du ignorere FIXME og laster dem bare rett opp i OSM.

Dersom du ikke stopper med importer vil jeg be DWG om å blokkere deg.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-14 05:33:26+00:00): DWG jobber nå med å finne ut hvordan vi best kan tilbakestille alle endringene, så vær så snill å ikke tilbakestille noe selv!

The DWG are now across this and working out how best to revert all the changes, so please don't revert anything yourself!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:20:54+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364356
5m4u9 (2023-09-13 05:32:37+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar.

Ese nombre para el puente es muy antiguo, la resolución 7794/2018 del concejo municipal nombra como estaba "jorge wilstermann", lo ratifica la plaqueta en el mismo puente en el lado de la benemeritos.

Sería bueno que menciones qué número ley menciona el nombre. No creo que sea ley, sino Ordenanza Municipal, las leyes de cochabamba comienzan desde 2016 aprox.
5m4u9 (2023-09-13 05:33:56+00:00): la RM 7794/2018... http://biblioteca.concejocbba.gob.bo/RESOLUCION/RM_7794_2018.pdf
5m4u9 (2023-09-13 05:47:30+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar.

En el mapa, el nombre de los rieles ferroviarios no es el nombre de la línea de servicio público de pasajeros.
5m4u9 (2023-09-13 05:54:21+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar.

Solo más infraestructuras grandes al final de los rieles suelen ser estaciones, este lugar es una parada.

Habría que revisar en el techo el nombre correcto.
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-07 00:01:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714106, 143714111 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines users nach selbstlöschung
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-05 23:10:49+00:00): Hello. Are you sure there's parking here? Aerial footage does not show one.
empty_child (2023-09-13 11:16:58+00:00): Hello Luka Dalakishvili,
leisure=sports_centre for these type of amenity
sergeybe (2023-12-17 02:08:28+00:00): Перестаньте гадить на карте. Только позорите свою страну.
empty_child (2023-09-13 11:12:09+00:00): Hello Luka Dalakishvili,
Name in Kartuli - in name and name:ka, in English - in name:en
user_5359 (2023-09-14 16:24:54+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10898644746. What is the mean of the tags
OSGB36 Station = TL78/13
T:UK Waypoint = TP6723
And I believe the point doesn't have the name "Trig Point".
user_5359 (2023-10-07 07:24:48+00:00): Could you please have the kindness to communicate the requested information?
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-07 00:01:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714106, 143714111 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines users nach selbstlöschung
Argbjorn (2023-09-13 08:45:29+00:00): Hi, Luka! It'll be good to add amenity=school to the school ground. Here's an explanation and examples: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141179410
jbcharron (2023-09-13 17:40:25+00:00): Bonsoir, merci pour ta contribution :)
Sur la ville de Metz, nous utilisons le schéma de transport en commun en v2, l'idéal serait de remettre l'emplacement d'arrêts des bus et pour faire le tracé on ajoute le linéaire routier dans la relation et non une ligne en plus.
Nous pouvons t'aider à améliorer la ligne de bus
Bonne soirée
mathis57 (2023-09-13 18:56:48+00:00): Hello,
Je vais voir ça je l'ai remarqué après effectivement, je ferais les édits dès que possible, concernant les tracés c'est donc en ajoutant les routes en relation sur la ligne?
Merci à toi !
sergeybe (2023-12-16 22:10:05+00:00): Все ваши правки идут в откат. OSM карта для людей, а не для политиков. Правило truth on the ground для OSM важнее того что там политики думают.
Oleksandr Kryushyn (2023-12-16 22:18:46+00:00): I don't speak Macedonian. Whatever was said in your comment, there should be no problem updating the names in my own country, officially verified by the legitimate government. The historical name was restored, as this land ethnically belongs to the Crimean Tatar people, and that is highly respected by Ukraine.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-12 20:00:30+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11186601175
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1127590881

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
BCNorwich (2023-09-13 05:42:49+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OSM practice is to, where possible amend or correct existing objects/features, rather than delete and add again. Thus the full history of the object is maintained. Deleting an object deletes its history.

I've reverted this deletion and moved the original building.

Regards Bernard.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-13 14:12:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207277009 - a to nie też track? On się tak urywa?
uprkos (2026-07-05 22:00:34+00:00): Już poprawione.
Langlaeufer (2023-09-13 12:04:51+00:00): Hi, 
Was hat das mit den 60 km/h auf sich? Warst du kürzlich dort vor Ort oder kommt das aus veralteten Mapillary-Bildern?
Grüße
Langläufer
Hedaja (2023-09-13 13:03:48+00:00): Ich bin in den letzten Wochen dort mehrmals entlang gefahren in beide Richtungen. Mittlerweile ist dort wirklich 60km/h.
Ich habe gestern auch neue Bilder für Mapilio aufgenommen, nur noch kein WLAN zum hochladen gehabt.
Langlaeufer (2023-09-13 13:31:42+00:00): O.k.
Carto'Cité (2023-12-30 14:27:38+00:00): Merci pour les nouvelles pistes cyclables ajoutée et avec la signalétique ! 😀
Charles
SomeoneElse (2023-09-15 09:13:00+00:00): Hello,
Andy from the DWG here.
Following complaints to the DWG I've reverted this and related changesets in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141278101 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141279957 .  See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15052 .
To discuss, please email the DWG at “data@openstreetmap.org” with a subject of “Re: [Ticket#2023091410000226] Issue #26308 dpolovinkin”.
Best Regards,
Andy
citrula (2023-09-12 21:43:49+00:00): Hi alizair, please take a look at the wiki to see some guidance on mapping sidewalks:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk#Separately_mapped_sidewalks
You might find it helpful, since you can mark pedestrian crossings around the school as well. Is #Driftnet a tag for an organized editing group? I can't find it on the wiki anywhere.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141181380
Đuro Jiří (2024-06-22 19:09:03+00:00): Ciao Latisana992,
ho notato che molto spesso hai mappato pista ciclopedonale come pista ciclabile, anche se esiste cartello stradale che indica pista ciclopedonale e non pista ciclabile. Alcune ho già corretto. Per favore non fai più queste modifiche.
Saluti
aTarom (2023-09-13 06:16:47+00:00): Hola i benvingut a OSM oscardev, em pots confirmar que aquests noms de sender són correctes?
"Feixes A"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207289279/history
"Espona connexió"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207285011/history
no trobo informació al respecte, si es tracta per exemple d'activitats de MTB disposeu de "mtb:name"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking
o d'altres que podeu consultar a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
Qualsevol dubte pots plantejar-la als canals de la comunitat, gràcies per editar

https://t.me/osmcat

https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/lang-ca/69
gis_shafter (2023-09-12 21:05:42+00:00): *Edited addresses, not street names.
gscholz (2023-09-14 07:01:37+00:00): Hi Felipe_lipeh,
this changeset has created errors regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-64.30952&lat=-8.85264&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
archpdx (2023-11-07 07:33:55+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for adding these new roads! I know this is an old changeset, but just wanted to let you know that road names shouldn't be abbreviated in OSM (see https://osm.wiki/abbreviation) It looks like another mapper has since unabbreviated these road names.

Happy Mapping!
CiscoCertified (2023-11-09 05:45:05+00:00): My bad and thank you for letting me know. I will work to not do this going forward. I appreciate the heads up!
landini (2023-09-14 17:43:38+00:00): Warum?

Webseite gibt es!
https://www.bistro-miss-sophie.com/
Strubbl (2023-09-14 17:49:44+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe die URL gelöscht: 
https://www.bistro-miss-sophie.de/

Also DE und nicht COM. 

Mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141269722 habe ich deine URL hinzugefügt.
Allison P (2024-01-06 07:04:01+00:00): What is the meaning of highway=yes on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817308429?
KevinMapsThings (2024-01-08 03:36:00+00:00): That most likely should have been highway=platform given that this is a bus platform.
Awoobis (2023-09-13 22:57:45+00:00): Bardzo dużo tego, aż miło widzieć.
HellMap (2023-09-13 10:52:19+00:00): Hi!

When drawing areas under bridges, please do not connect them to the bridge area itself unless they are at the same height. These elements here are mostly on different layers, so you have to consider real-world vertical layout. The grass does not "end" because the aerial imagery has a bridge there. This is a difficult area to map because of this. I have attempted to retrace and fix these here.

Thanks
eggie (2023-09-13 05:55:58+00:00): Van het Buitengrachtpad had je de highwaytag verwijderd. Die heb ik teruggezet.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141182720
MVG
eggie
MattijsLeon73 (2023-09-13 07:56:20+00:00): Ah bedankt. Ik wilde hem eigenlijk helemaal weghalen, want het is een dijkje, maar niet echt een pad. Er wordt niet gemaaid en het is ook niet verhard. Verder snap ik niet zo goed waar de naam vandaan komt, er is geen bordje oid.
eggie (2023-09-13 08:01:35+00:00): Ahhh...  zo..  Wanneer het geen pad is kan het weg, maar in de opzet van de wijk is het kennelijk wel een pad. De naam heb ik uit de BGT omtrekgericht (transparant)
Wanneer publiek toch het dijkje volgt dan zou je ook informal=yes kunnen toevoegen surface=grass en anders wghalen... Up to you. 

Wanneer je denkt dat die namen er niet horen kunnen ze ook weg. Zal nog even in Verbeter de kaart Kadaster kijken. 

Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-09-13 08:03:49+00:00): Die namen zijn officieel bekend en dat buitengrachtpad loopt zelfs de hoek nog om naar het zuiden.
Je moet maar even kijken wat je daar mee doet en anders het Kadaster/BGT om opheldering vragen. 
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=136616.65&geometry.y=444009.67&zoomlevel=13.45

Groet
eggie
eggie (2023-09-13 08:05:04+00:00): Er is zelfs een Kasteeltuinpad gepland, maar dat is in het veld ook niet te vinden. Misschien komt het er niet?
MattijsLeon73 (2023-09-13 08:27:57+00:00): Bedankt voor je comments, ik ben nog een beginnende mapper dus ik weet nog niet super goed waar ik alle data vandaan kan halen. Ik zal er vanmiddag nog even heenlopen en kijken.
MattijsLeon73 (2023-09-13 08:29:13+00:00): Kan die link die je stuurde (verbeterdekaart) ook in JOSM geladen worden?
eggie (2023-09-13 08:37:22+00:00): Verbeter de kaart niet, maar de BGT omtrekgericht wel.
Dan kun je ook wegen en gebouwen netjes uitlijnen.
BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 
en  .. 
Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

Https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644
eggie (2023-09-13 08:41:06+00:00): Kijk even goed naar de links die allroads opgeeft. Nu zijn die nogal eens  verhuisd. (Dus aangepast)  Dus even zoeken welke link nog wel werkt.
eggie (2023-09-13 08:44:35+00:00): wmts:https://service.pdok.nl/lv/bgt/wmts/v1_0?request=GetCapabilities&service=WMTS

Deze dus als wmts invoeren
MattijsLeon73 (2023-09-13 08:46:18+00:00): Bedankt!
Mahdi Nameghi (2024-01-23 05:42:22+00:00): سلام
میشه بفرمایید هدف از این تغییرات چی بوده؟
چرا روی اینهمه خطوط پیاده تگ 
access=no
زدین؟
secondaryhighway (2023-09-12 22:13:38+00:00): This is a proof of concept, may be reverted at any time.
cserpell (2023-09-13 21:21:32+00:00): I think this change is wrong, if you see recent imagery you will see that the rightmost group of apartments is like the previous to the left, and the street just continues open.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141183030
wabozand (2023-09-14 22:17:52+00:00): Hey cserpell, thanks for reaching out. For this area, I was focusing on making the map unified and consistent in this area. The gate mentioned https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10694182089 can be seen in Esri Imagery and a bit of partially in Bing Imagery. All gates in this area can be confirmed in Aerial Imagery and have private tags added. With that in mind, I added private tagging to this gate to match the others. I wanted to make the classifications more consistent as well, so i reclassified https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207298412 to service to match the others in the area.
Kai Johnson (2023-11-15 16:37:02+00:00): It's better to preserve history by editing existing elements in place (e.g., way/138152961) in place rather than deleting them and replacing them. / Il est préférable de préserver l'historique en modifiant les éléments existants (par exemple, way/138152961) plutôt que de les supprimer et de les remplacer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141183395
seattlefyi (2023-09-12 23:34:31+00:00): Thanks for the update!
laurent-38 (2023-10-21 11:34:34+00:00): Bonjour ldez,

Je suis sceptique sur l'utilité d'un tel changement, même si le wiki semble valider ce cas d'usage, voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Cartographie_des_routes_en_France#S%C3%A9paration_des_voies_(un_ou_deux_%22way%22_parall%C3%A8les) . 

En revanche, il est important, quand on se lance ce type de changement, de traiter aussi toutes les caractéristiques non géométriques : destination, turn:lanes, lignes de bus.

J'ai fait le nécessaire pour destination et turn:lanes : https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142918816
Pour les lignes de bus, je vais faire le nécessaire progressivement car les lignes du réseau Ruban ont largement évolué (les lignes 20/21/22/M/C ont toutes changé).

Pour ces changements complexes, l'éditeur josm est plus adapté que l'éditeur intégré iD.

Cordialement
~~
Laurent
laurent-38 (2023-10-21 11:41:51+00:00): Autre correction : https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=142920111
BlueButterfly (2024-03-07 18:40:03+00:00): Hello gameswill2008,

I noticed you removed aeroway=jet_bridge tag and changed the highway type from corridor to footway on the airport’s passenger boarding bridges. According to the OSM Wiki page for aeroway=jet_bridge (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Djet_bridge), these bridge way features should be tagged with highway=corridor (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcorridor),  as corridor tags are "used to map a hallway inside a building”, rather than highway=footway (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway) which are used for "pedestrianized streets”.  Mapping to these established tagging guidelines are the most accurate and would avoid inconsistencies at this and other airports. For that reason, I will be restoring these ways to how they were previously tagged based on this OSM policy.

Please let me know if you have any questions on this or would like further clarification.
Have a good day!
ratrun (2023-09-13 15:20:21+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM,

please note that your tagging of oneway=yes for a highway=pedestrian does not seem right. First highway=pedestrian is usually used for pedestrian zones. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian#Vehicle_access. The way in this area seem more like ordinary highway=footway. Second a oneway for a footway is very unusual. How is this enforced ?
Third you created a couple of connectivity issues because of the parallel running ways. So please consider turning the ways into turning to highway=footway and deleting all the superflous parallel ways.
MissMarcoPolo (2023-09-15 19:21:40+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-04-27.
AgusQui (2023-11-29 03:14:36+00:00): Porque habilitaste este enlace? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536155990
gscholz (2023-09-14 06:45:59+00:00): Hi Equipe OBRAC 2023,
your recent edits have left behind several errors regarding self intersecting ways, duplicate nodes and huge buildings, which do not exist:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-52.04842&lat=-3.26557&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.

Please be careful about what you are doing.
Guido
thekingofravens (2023-09-20 00:23:19+00:00): Amazon will probably vandalize this later.
hanchao (2023-09-13 02:23:54+00:00): 为什么要删除名称
hanchao (2023-09-13 02:26:02+00:00): 已恢复 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141186615
这里没有鱼 (2023-09-13 02:53:56+00:00): 本地语言是中文，不要改成英文。
这里没有鱼 (2023-09-13 02:55:14+00:00): 已还原成中文

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141186955
这里没有鱼 (2023-09-13 02:56:14+00:00): 英文名放在 name:en 中
这里没有鱼 (2023-09-13 08:07:26+00:00): 不要破坏数据，已恢复
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141195800
phidauex (2023-09-18 16:34:39+00:00): Thanks for this! I keep having to un-expand East->E (and North/South/West) for letter-streets in CO (mostly SW CO). Are you doing the same for the other combos?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141187362
这里没有鱼 (2023-09-13 08:07:12+00:00): 不要破坏数据，已恢复
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141195800
user_5359 (2023-09-13 05:02:53+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys).
Frans S (2023-09-17 09:19:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
All individual buildings need to be mapped.
You tagged a settlement as 1 residential building, which is not correct. 
The area of a settlement can be tagged as landuse=residential,
Buildings need to be tagged as building=yes.
Please solve issues like nodes connected to highways before you upload your work
Best regards and keep mapping
Tayvick (2023-09-13 04:01:31+00:00): Other source: Bing Streetside
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:41:48+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353352
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 02:59:18+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173697827