piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscscnd (2025-10-14 10:48:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036506112
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442035713
Zbędne oneway=no.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216534087
unclassified było o tyle nieszczęśliwe, że kończyło się na skrzyżowaniu z residential. Byłbym raczej za tym, żeby przywrócić tutaj unclassified i pociągnąć je dalej w kierunku marketów. Na pewno poprowadzone między marketami residential trzeba zastąpić albo service, albo unclassified.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298613228
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155094842
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216139266
Moim zdaniem przynajmniej unclassified, m.in. dlatego, że jest to popularna alternatywa dla Nad Rudą i Dworcowej. Chyba że to zmiana na czasu prac remontowych.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442035710https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442035711
Unikaj oneway=-1. Zazwyczaj lepiej jest odwrócić kierunek drogi i użyć oneway=yes.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172793857
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1197817403
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397374494
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172793858
Co do samego podnoszenia z residential i unclassified na tertiary się nie wypowiadam, ale jeśli miałoby tak zostać, to te kawałki powinny być tertiary_link (lub odpowiednio secondary_link według alternatywnej koncepcji).
gscscnd (2025-10-14 10:50:16+00:00): Korekta formatowania czwartej uwagi:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442035710
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442035711
Unikaj oneway=-1. Zazwyczaj lepiej jest odwrócić kierunek drogi i użyć oneway=yes.
Multidragon (2025-10-14 12:13:04+00:00): uczę się dopiero, a chciałem poprawić kilka rzeczy w moim mieście. wydawało mi się że ktoś dał highway=unclassified bo nie wiedział jakie droga ma znaczenie i miał dylemat pomiędzy residential a tertiary, dlatego niektóre z nich zdeklasowałem a inne podniosłem. oneway=-1 postaram się poprawić
Multidragon (2025-10-15 10:05:53+00:00): okej poprawiłem oneway na całej obwodnicy i węźle przy AZE, w strefie handlowej tj ul. Polska jest teraz unclassified, a ul. Francuska jest service. Jeśli chodzi o ul. Kolejową, obecnie jest ona tylko residential i to ślepa bo nie ma tam dojazdu od dworcowej z powodu budowy Wiaduktu
S-zation (2025-10-15 01:42:34+00:00): Thank you! I saw this one the other day. Added additional tags to the camera.
SomeoneElse2 (2025-10-13 22:55:26+00:00): What I had to do to edit the SR was to load the SR into iD by editing it from the website, then moving to https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/53.3102525/-1.8310127 where both stages 1 and 2 are.  From stage 2 (which was a member of the SR) I could select the SR.  I could then go to stage 1 and add to the SR by number.
b-jazz (2025-10-14 16:16:37+00:00): This edit is incorrect and breaks the existing relation. 

Please see the wiki that explains this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID_understanding_golf_course_relations

thanks
Teevolve (2025-10-14 16:31:25+00:00): So why aren't the rest of the fairways done the same way?
b-jazz (2025-10-14 16:34:49+00:00): They will be. It takes time to correct years of bad practices. The vast majority of them have already been fixed.
Teevolve (2025-10-14 16:55:29+00:00): If theyre a line they dont export properly into   the program, for simulation.

How essential for openstreet is this relation?
b-jazz (2025-10-14 22:32:38+00:00): You need to work with the author of your tool to implement a fix on their side. OSM has strict, well documented, standards on how to map everything from roads to golf courses to zoos. This isn't an OSM problem, it's a golf simulator problem.

This is a long standing bug that they are aware of. There is even a fix that has been proposed that hasn't been integrated yet. See https://github.com/chadrockey/TGC-Designer-Tools/pull/143. Maybe you could add your voice to the pull request asking it to be incorporated. If you're technical enough, you could pull it yourself into a private version of the tool and run your own fixed version.

Breaking golf courses in OSM and causing others to have to clean up after you will likely result in a ban. And honestly, none of us want to see that happen. Thanks.
CAM-Gerlach (2025-10-14 08:01:44+00:00): Just FYI, I'd previously added `oneway=yes` here and elsewhere on local roundabouts (it generally wasn't present before) but later removed it as Osmose flagged it as redundant (FWIW) and per the wiki, `junction=roundabout` directly implies `oneway=yes` (and by definition a roundabout must be oneway), and in the prose it states:

>  oneway=yes is implied and redundant. In specific cases, it can be added for clarity though.

If its "clearly" one way, seems like that second bit wouldn't apply here?

On the other hand, I do tend to prefer explicit over implicit tags, so there's that argument.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173250739
CAM-Gerlach (2025-10-14 08:01:48+00:00): Overall, I don't have a strong preference, I just think we should be consistent either way, at the very least locally (per OSM principles) if not nationally or with OSM as a whole. Perhaps the #local-nrv channel in the OSMUS Slack, where several of the other most active NRV mappers hang out, might be a good venue to decide on this?

Just for reference, worldwide less than 20% of roundabouts have oneway= https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/junction%3Droundabout#combinations . On the other hand, in the US https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/north-america:us/tags/junction=roundabout#combinations and Virginia https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/north-america:us:virginia/tags/junction=roundabout#combinations that rises to over 50% (perhaps because of the lower familiarity and less consistent usage of roundabouts versus circulars and other types of junctions here versus in Europe and elsewhere, thus greater perceived need for explicit clarification).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173250739
CAM-Gerlach (2025-10-14 08:03:05+00:00): (BTW, would be great to have you on there, as you're one of the most experienced and knowledgeable mappers in the area that's currently active :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173250739
jSeke (2025-11-14 15:38:43+00:00): is it really right to change the station names to Partick (subway) and Partick (rail)?
pitfire (2025-10-14 08:35:51+00:00): Hallo Felix the Fastest,
auch hier ist:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:railway=signal%20box?uselang=de#Aufgegebene_Stellwerke. 

Zurückgebaute Stellwerke
Füge razed:railway=signal_box hinzu.

 Für Name:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

VG
pitfire (2025-10-14 08:22:16+00:00): Hallo Felix the Fastest,

bitte keine Namensfelder für weiter Informationen nutzen. Das Gebäude ist bereits mit disused:railway=signal_box erfasst.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Gleiches gilt für Änderungssatz: 173250939.  ESTW-A ist eine Nutzungseigenschaft / Beschreibung. Die gesamte Bahn Struktur im Bahngelände Beuel ist im Umbau und bedarf einer späteren Überarbeitung.

VG
eggie (2025-10-14 06:01:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. Lijkt me oke.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
osmviborg (2025-10-14 06:20:26+00:00): Hej, vær venlig ikke at røre ved adressepunkterne. Det er en kommunal beslutning om et adressepunkt skal ændres/slettes. https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Da:Adresser
eggie (2025-10-14 06:04:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Je maakt zelf een opmerking op de kaart dat het niet klopt. Ik heb je bijdrage verwijderd en de ijssalon samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Madorian (2025-10-14 08:42:09+00:00): Sorry, ik wou de giftshop weghalen omdat het geen gift shop is maar een ijssalon. 
En bedankt voor het warme welkom! Ik zal de links bekijken. :)
eggie (2025-10-14 08:48:19+00:00): Oke.. no problem.   Je zou eens naar een reguliere editor kunnen kijken. Die apps zijn heel beperkt en kunnen niet goed met adresnodes omgaan. Je krijgt dan dubbele adressen.
In OSM Nederland hoef je adressen aan te maken. 

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-10-14 06:07:28+00:00): Adres compleet gemaakt
citrula (2025-10-14 02:07:47+00:00): if it isn't starting construction until 2032, it doesn't belong on OSM (yet)
Udarian (2025-10-14 20:13:30+00:00): question, why disused:*=* as this seems to be closed for renovations and not permanently, wouldn't construction tagging be better?
seattlefyi (2025-10-15 02:37:19+00:00): Hi, my goal was to remove the park from the map data with that tag and that name, and this worked. I'd heard it was permanently closed, to perhaps be turned into a different kind of aquarium with a new name, so the disused prefix  seems to accurately reflect its current real world state (existing but not in use) until more details come out. I've seen cases where the stated plan doesn't actually happen, or things to be demolished kept around and reused, so I just try to reflect reality rather than what's promised. You're more likely to track the future changes, when you feel like construction has started, feel free to update the prefixes.
Udarian (2025-10-15 03:25:46+00:00): According to the aquariums own website on the “Calendar and Hours” page they are 
“CURRENTLY CLOSED FOR RENOVATIONS”, that reads more like construction to me
eggie (2025-10-14 06:10:46+00:00): Dag Madorian,
Haantjebak staat nu 2x op de kaart?
Tip Haal svp zelf je eigen opmerkingen van de kaart.

MVG
eggie
Madorian (2025-10-14 08:43:51+00:00): Weet niet waarom het 2x op de kaart staat, sorry. 
Hoe haal ik mijn opmerking weg? Ik kan het niet vinden.. zal nog door zoeken! xD
eggie (2025-10-14 08:52:17+00:00): Het stond al op de kaart als gebied en ook als heuveltop, maar kennelijk met een verkeerde naam.

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173251396
De vorige mapper noemde het Haantjeduin.
Ik ben er niet genoeg bekend dus up to you.

Laat het voorlopig maar staan als de voorgaande naam niet klopte. 
Vraag wel even een ervaren lokale mapper om mee te kijken. 

MVG
eggie
Geim (2025-10-14 09:07:44+00:00): Hallo Madorian,
Er zijn 2 zaken, het gebied Haantjebak en de peak (heuvel) Haantjeduin. 
Zie: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haantjeduin
De heuvel heb jij hernoemd naar Haantjebak, wat dus niet correct is. Zou je dat terug willen wijzigen?

Met vr. gr. Geim
Madorian (2025-10-14 09:16:35+00:00): Mij us geleerd dat het haantjebak heet. Daarom zit er ook een haantjebak meer naast. Ik heb nooit gehoord van haantjeduin..
Geim (2025-10-14 09:18:41+00:00): Heb je de wiki bekeken?
Geim (2025-10-14 09:20:20+00:00): Anders google even op Haantjeduin.
Madorian (2025-10-14 09:24:32+00:00): ???
ja ik kan op links klikken en ik kan lezen. 
Ik herhaal, ik heb nooit gehoord van haantjeduin. Ik ben hier opgegroeid, ik heb geleerd dat het Haantjebak heet.
Als je het wil veranderen be my guest..
blijkbaar mag ik helaal geen input brengen leuk.
Veel succes!
eggie (2025-10-14 09:53:27+00:00): reverted by changeset #173265314

Madorian.. Ik heb je wijziging voorlopig toch even teruggedraaid.
OSM is een samenwerkingsproject.
Probeer er uit te komen met je medemappers.
Soms is dat lastig, maar samen proberen we van OSM de beste kaart te maken.
Het gebied Haantjebak staat gewoon op de kaart als 'gebied' en Haantjeduin staat dan als heuvel.
Bij ingrijpende wijzigingen bericht ik meestal de voorgaande mapper. Dat was in dit geval medemapper Geim. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-14 09:57:27+00:00): Haantjebak heb ik als alt_name ingevoerd, want....

Wat is wat?
Omdat de heuvel in een veel bezocht stuifzandgebied ligt, is de heuvel de laatste jaren geslonken. Tot in de jaren 50 stond op de heuvel een uitkijktoren. De namen Haantjebak en Haantjeduin worden tegenwoordig beide gebruikt voor de heuvel.
Vroeger waren het echter twee verschillende dingen: Het Haantjeduin was de heuvel, en het Haantjebak de zandverstuiving waar de heuvel onderdeel van was. En op een oude kaart uit 1902 is zelfs te zien dat Haantjebak nog een ander gebied was, een veel moerassiger gebied, met een vennetje. Pas later werd de naam gebruikt voor de zandverstuiving.
MVG
eggie
gscholz (2025-12-09 09:35:14+00:00): Hi Hamilcar117,
this changeset has creted several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and displaced ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=2.34317&lat=48.85207&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=173251568

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Hamilcar117 (2025-12-09 17:04:56+00:00): Hello Guido,
OMG, what have I done ! ^^ My finger obviously slipped on the screen and I didn't realise my mistake. I will fix this right now. Thank you for your message.
Kind regards,
Hamilcar
Gregory Peony (2025-10-14 01:56:24+00:00): Hi, the footpritns you added here do not represent buildings, but rather 'roof furniture' like walls. Cross reference Bing to see the disparity beween the shadow length cast by the buildings and these features on the roof. Read my project comment for more.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173251576
user_23393743 (2025-10-14 00:38:48+00:00): Removed covered parking by River Hollow Road.
Foxscotch (2025-10-14 00:45:15+00:00): This is an uncomfortably large changeset, but there was literally no sidewalk info beforehand, and I had trouble deciding where to break it up. I just wanted to acknowledge that lol
Hayleox (2025-11-12 22:26:26+00:00): What is this way for? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155993380 Is this just an old version of the GE landuse area that needs to be deleted?
wadenick (2025-10-18 23:18:30+00:00): You've deleted the temporary Pro Shop at Lake Chabot Golf Course. Why? ➔ https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441514060
wadenick (2025-10-18 23:27:45+00:00): For your reference, here is _current_ Airbus / Maxar / Vexcel imagery from 2025 via Google Maps: https://maps.app.goo.gl/a27X43MiWYpeUXtw7
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-26 15:02:56+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13232044674/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit
how something exist and have width=0?
Oderradler (2025-11-26 15:17:41+00:00): Ja die Breite muss noch rein, ist etwa 10 cm dick. Siehe hier:
https://mapillary.com/map/im/433846509361533
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 09:40:01+00:00): thanks for a fix!
Supaplex (2025-11-23 15:23:08+00:00): 港子國小已經廢校了，請用disused前綴
nevw (2025-10-15 23:33:26+00:00): Another iD user mess to clean up
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.06430&lat=-26.80370&zoom=19
nevw (2025-10-16 03:40:16+00:00): After my ill mannered comment, I felt obliged and have fixed this
brightj (2025-10-14 04:11:24+00:00): And some cairns, since trail is hard to see under leaves in fall
GrabMY_ainayusof (2025-10-23 06:39:52+00:00): hello. based on our local on ground team, road has been permanently closed. thanks
Kaduna (2025-10-27 09:33:03+00:00): Hi GrabMY_ainayusof, thank you for making the corrections with your local insights.
user_5359 (2025-10-15 16:58:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13232141482. What is the mean of the tags
DCLUSTAT = DRAFT
DCLUSTATDT = 2009-01-06
MAILUSECOD = 0
?
Lumikeiju (2025-10-15 18:02:04+00:00): Hi, thanks for catching those and for reaching out to ask about them! They are present in the source dataset and not intended to be uploaded to OSM. I've removed those tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173332231 and additionally checked using Overpass that there are no other instances of those tags having been incorrectly added. I'll also make changes to my process to ensure those aren't added in future edits.

Thank you!
ilias_ (2025-10-14 14:29:09+00:00): Thanks a lot for the discussion!
habi (2025-10-14 18:19:27+00:00): Ich habe im Original-Changeset noch einen kleinen Kommentar dazu hinterlassen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165816393
Piagno (2025-10-15 02:14:51+00:00): danke :)
evgenykatyshev (2025-10-14 17:47:18+00:00): Such an edit is a vandalism. I've reverted it

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173287836
aceman444 (2025-10-14 21:36:27+00:00): Hi, what was wrong here?
Aside from damaging the geometry of the incoming road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287370446 .
Why did the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1442069772 need to be added?
Show me the exact error maproulette was claiming.
aceman444 (2025-10-14 21:38:48+00:00): And of course, you have now damaged all bus route relations passing this roundabout, as you didn't remove needed segments out of the relations (what needs to be done now when you split the roundabout into parts).
BR_pebble (2025-10-16 04:40:59+00:00): Hi aceman 444, 
I have made the edit in order to address the issue of connecting approaching and departing segments at the same node as documented in: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Connecting_ways
Changeset reverted based on your feedback. I will go on to fix the k-model issue, manage the turn restriction without splitting the roundabout (roundabout as via member, in compliance with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction#Members), thus, not disturbing any existing route relations. Please let me know if this will be alright.
aceman444 (2025-10-16 18:09:36+00:00): Ok, thank you for the explanation. I see the description on the wiki. But notice that it is marked 'dubious', thus I think no mass edits should be made based on it. Also, notice the reasoning for it is that routers should pass at least a small segment of the roundabout so that they even notice it (and can speak it out ("enter roundabout")). But I assume that is for cases where you can enter with one of the branching roads and then exit immediatelly with the next. But that is not the case here, you cannot exit the roundabout via the Napervillska street (there was a turn restriction relation present). You must go via the rounandabout and exit at the Chrenovska street at the soonest. Thus, the router will pass over a segment of the roundabout in all cases, whether you add the small segment you created or not.

So either you revert this changeset as it is not needed to solve anything, or fix all the bus lines, but that will be very tedious and costly for no benefit. Just don't have an invalid middle-ground with broken bus relations.
Thank you.
aceman444 (2025-10-16 18:12:01+00:00): I don't think the whole roundabout needs to be the 'via' member of the no-turn-right restriction. Just the common node of the 2 ways, as it was before.
BR_pebble (2025-10-17 08:37:15+00:00): Thank you for your understanding and your detailed explanations aceman444.Seeing similar roundabouts in the area were not split, we thought about following the community pattern and tried to think how the turn restriction can be modeled in that state. Changeset reverted to bring back the previous geometry and relations. Have a good day.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-14 06:51:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8371210929
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12698069702
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12698069701
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12469304611
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441871522
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441875909
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/901141097
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1441923401

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-10-14 06:51:02+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320520105

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2025-10-22 13:15:03+00:00): Merhaba. Değişiklik açıklamanıza "yol açıldı" yazmışsınız. Fakat yollara access=no etiketi eklemişsiniz. access=no etiketi eklediğiniz yollar kalıcı olarak erişime mi kapatıldı?
citrula (2025-10-14 22:04:49+00:00): This isn't a service road.
rboda (2025-10-29 03:31:16+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you
s_SoNick (2025-10-14 08:13:27+00:00): Good catch! I didn't know of the shop=plant_hire tag when I added the details but it's a perfect fit!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-14 17:23:43+00:00): and thanks for adding it!

tagfiddling like this is quite trivial to do and can be easily done remotely (I edited it from Poland) while adding shop would not be so easy :)
tastrax (2025-10-14 09:20:53+00:00): Is this shop closed permanently?
Reckless32 (2025-10-14 09:46:12+00:00): Yes, it is closed permanently, we were there today.
tastrax (2025-10-15 11:16:01+00:00): Not sure on this edit - too many numbers in the phone number to be an australian number (+61) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=13226901101#map=20/-38.1037504/147.0872436
Arcas88 (2025-10-15 11:51:03+00:00): looking on the website of that hotel that's what is set as the phone number, some have some rlly weird phone numbers but they seem to work
tastrax (2025-10-15 22:46:23+00:00): Sorry wrong node - try this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13232198663/history#map=19/-38.103874/147.087477
Arcas88 (2025-10-16 01:41:55+00:00): when trying to call that number it says it doesnt exist so i will remove it as i cant find a different one
habi (2025-10-14 07:32:48+00:00): Please, please make smaller changesets.
Since you've requested a review in this changeset a lot of mappers from central Europe which look for those have been alerted about this.
JeroenHoek (2025-10-14 08:31:41+00:00): Gebruik voor de website-tag van filialen de filiaalpagina:

https://www.kwik-fit.nl/vestigingen/leeuwarden/sixmastraat-11

Als je wil linken naar de algemene website, kun je brand:website gebruiken.
TonyJC (2025-10-19 02:01:49+00:00): Buenas, se noto que usted borro varios puntos de informacion que eran importantes, como building:part(s) y el hecho que unos sitios son edificios  y por alguna razon usted borro este factor en la informacion. Quisiera obtener una explicacion en la cual usted hizo esto.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-14 17:25:27+00:00): Thanks for a fix! 

As explanation: it is a very minor nitpicking but it strictly speaking it is not correct - and some routers refuse to use any road with construction= tags

so I occasionally hunt for this kind of tagging mistakes
scai (2025-10-14 17:40:24+00:00): Yes, I fully agree. It is a contradiction after all and thus it should get fixed :)
porfiriopaiz (2025-10-14 22:23:57+00:00): Why did you remove an existing node to add a new one when you could have simply moved the existing node to a new position?

Please don't do that again. It is important to be able to preserve the history associated to any existing elements rather than removing them, it is better to edit existing info, rather than deleting it and adding a new one with the exact same tags.
porfiriopaiz (2025-10-14 22:30:25+00:00): It is useless

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173295900
Lachgast (2025-10-27 10:29:17+00:00): Just got here to see if a shop was already on the map.
Great to see you updated the shop info here! Happy mapping.