piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Bluhdmin (2026-03-06 14:31:00+00:00): Road construction took down this flock cam.
Wildsharky (2026-03-10 05:20:43+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179471871
NeisBot (2026-03-05 21:27:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1485813270 v2 | 10 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1485483293 v3 | 6 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179416259
MappingMore (2026-03-06 07:58:49+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179431144
mcliquid (2026-03-06 12:21:11+00:00): Hello, it would be a pleasure for all reviewers of OSM data if you could save the next time when you move from Cabo Verde to Slovensko in one changeset :)
Thank you!
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-13 14:32:29+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179771308
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-13 14:34:10+00:00): Hi Mateusz Konieczny,

I’m not sure what’s going on here, but some of your map edits seem to have been reverted after your revert.

Best regards,
Pascal
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-13 17:55:16+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179815332
Lokai (2026-03-06 18:46:33+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen bei OSM.

Bitte beachten der name-Schlüssel ist nur für Eigennamen gedacht. 14 ist die Hausnummer, so ist es auch eingetragen.

Als source wäre survey der richtige Wert und nicht Eigentümer o.ä.

Gruß
Fizzie-DWG (2026-03-06 03:40:43+00:00): DWG revert - apparent vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179423294
Kees 59 (2026-03-18 08:35:50+00:00): I came by https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13556633893 which has an extra = in the value of the socket:type2_combo:output.
I also noticed that the value of socket:type2:current is set to 250 Kw that can not be correct. Current should be in Amps.
stillhart (2026-03-18 21:38:54+00:00): clearly wrong, I'm sorry.
muralito (2026-03-06 12:03:26+00:00): This is not just vandalism, but a test for stored XSS. https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/xss/
Frans S (2026-03-07 09:02:42+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Issues found on your mappings
A: Inaccurate mapping.  (Often oversized)
D: Connecting nodes to other features.
E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
G: Included the shadow of the building.


Explanation can be found in this document which  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179416874
Wouam54 (2026-03-09 10:25:09+00:00): Thank you for your valuable advice so that I can improve my feedback and participate in a more efficient and productive mapping ;)
t_ja (2026-04-30 20:14:10+00:00): Aj v tejto sade zmien stacilo zmazat highway=traffic_signals z bodu, kde sa krizovali ulice. 
Namiesto toho si NEZMYSELNE zmazal cely bod v kazdej krizovatke, cim si rozbil vsetky zakazy odbocenia v tychto krizovatkach ☹️
NeisBot (2026-03-05 21:52:22+00:00): Hi thee360, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 88% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 highway(s)
- 3 name(s)
- 2 surface(s)
- 1 waterway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179416978
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-06 07:16:34+00:00): User reverts their own edits?
Fizzie-DWG (2026-03-06 03:39:00+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19874
VictorIE (2026-06-18 02:48:44+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2715280669

Is there a story behind not:natural=tree ? :) There are 4 of them.
PluMGMK (2026-06-18 07:17:47+00:00): Hi! Yeah, because of the different offsets on newer imagery, someone had added four "trees" that were actually pylons I had already mapped.

Thinking about it now, it might have been AI-assisted...
totera (2026-03-05 23:47:17+00:00): Ciao AwFi, credi che abbia senso questa relazione? Forse potrebbe essere una route=tracks, ma con route=train è sicuramente sbagliata
AwFi (2026-03-05 23:54:05+00:00): Ciao, secondo me ha poco senso ma ne ho solo rimosso il tag network e corretto operator. 
Se proprio si dovesse lasciare concordo con te nel cambiarla in route=tracks. A dire la verità ci ce ne sono parecchi di casi simili in giro che ho notato sistemando operator e network, infatti mi sono fermato e nei prossimi giorni vedo di migliorare la situazione con più calma.  Ma sono veramente tantissime le relazioni sbagliate in ferrovia.
ajmat (2026-03-06 11:51:40+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179440964
Wildsharky (2026-03-06 12:20:13+00:00): Revert of 179417681
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-05 22:38:57+00:00): ani osiedlami ani innymi realnymi obiektami administracyjnymi
Bluhdmin (2026-03-06 14:30:10+00:00): Construction took down this cam.
ion_chi (2026-03-09 14:09:51+00:00): I think bicycle=use_sidepath was added precisely because there's a separate cycleway. In Illinois, cyclists are required to use the bike lane when one exists
Jan Wilts (2026-03-05 22:36:38+00:00): Zie ook discussie in changeset/179251828
NeisBot (2026-03-05 22:54:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13507696930 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Flooring store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-14 05:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179838094
(Restore previous tags. No changes)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-20 18:21:29+00:00): Mhm
NeisBot (2026-03-05 23:00:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13615215423 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Flooring store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-14 05:33:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179838096
(Restore previous tags. No changes)

If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
NeisBot (2026-03-05 23:00:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11757296425 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Recording Studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-14 05:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179838098
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
theDM (2026-03-05 23:42:41+00:00): Czyli jednak była tam ta strefa? Chyba najdziwniejsza strefa zamiszkania, jaką znam.
czebureks (2026-03-06 12:58:22+00:00): Rzeczywiście ciekawostka przyrodnicza. Zgadywałbym, że ma to jakiś związek z przepisami dotyczącymi parkowania.
007Transformer (2026-03-06 11:35:01+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179375824
pwbriggs (2026-03-10 02:22:44+00:00): That is correct https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/007Transformer, no need to comment. See revert:id=179375824 tag on changeset.
pwbriggs (2026-05-06 18:47:36+00:00): You added a lot of parking spaces with access=publicznyhttp://www.sp1.nowytarg.pl/ -- was that a mistake? I'll remove those tags.
Florek89 (2026-03-21 22:35:04+00:00): Witam, gdzie znalazłeś plany przebiegu tej przeprawy? Można prosić o jakiś link? Sam tego szukałem, ale nie mogłem nic znaleźć. Z góry dzięki.
MapowiczniAK (2026-03-27 17:38:58+00:00): Wyszukaj w Google nowy mosty sochaczew a tam znajdziesz wszystkie informacje. A dokładniejszy link to: https://sochaczew.pl/aktualnosci/budowa-nowego-mostu-coraz-blizej.html
philipcullen (2026-03-05 23:56:45+00:00): Thank you - I'd not quite finished this changeset, but this is a good catch that I wouldn't have spotted (which is the best type of catch).

I've added that multiple UPRNs on each side of a semi-detached house might indicate an issue to my checks, but not considered that building=residential might be more appropriate than building=house for these types of buildings.
gurglypipe (2026-03-06 00:00:18+00:00): Ah, I’d not noticed the changeset was still open (OSMCha is not good at highlighting that), so sorry if my edit collided with yours, that wasn’t intentional.

building=residential is indeed a good catch-all for this kind of situation, and a clear way of indicating that an on-the-ground survey is needed to refine the building type further.
philipcullen (2026-03-06 00:09:25+00:00): No worries - we're all limited by tooling.

That sounds like a sensible default for residential-but-ambiguous, so I'll go with "residential" rather than "house" for these instances.
eggie (2026-03-06 08:43:34+00:00): Dag  TheIndra,

Nuttige aanvulling. Ik heb alleen de oneway=yes verwijderd van dat kleine stukje Einthovenstraat en G11 accesstags toegevoegd aan het fietspad.

MVG
eggie
DD1GJ (2026-03-06 00:05:40+00:00): Steht das Gebäude noch oder wurde es abgerisen?
DD1GJ (2026-03-06 00:09:03+00:00): Die Frage hat sich wohl erledigt. Ich habe gerade landuse=construction bemerkt
MappingMore (2026-03-06 11:53:06+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179442873
LordGarySugar (2026-07-08 20:07:15+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding these buildings, I have made some adjustments here. It would be great going forwards if terraced and semidetached houses would be drawn as individual, connected buildings, rather than merged together. You can use OSMUK cadastral parcels to highlight property boundaries for this. Please also use 'Q' to square buildings once they are drawn. There are a few buildings here which should have been tagged building=apartments, if you are unsure what type of building it is please use building=yes rather than building=house. Thanks.
Frans S (2026-03-09 11:35:29+00:00): Hello. 
Thanks for mapping.
Please follow the guidelines how to tag highways
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
 
Here you tagged tracks. Path or unclassified is a better choice.
Best regards
MappingMore (2026-03-06 09:36:23+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179435375
ajmat (2026-03-06 17:08:06+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179456215
Wildsharky (2026-03-06 12:15:47+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179443537
MappingMore (2026-03-06 08:47:46+00:00): Revert of 179375771
Wildsharky (2026-03-06 12:14:07+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179433708
MappingMore (2026-03-07 04:49:31+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179472601
Wildsharky (2026-03-10 05:17:33+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179471176
Natfoot (2026-03-09 05:46:02+00:00): before removing things ask yourself can it be tagged another way. I added back the line you deleted. i has been added back as railway=abandoned 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179562116
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179420725
DFH808 (2026-03-10 00:17:45+00:00): Didn't mean to delete one, I'll be more careful. Thank you for restoring it.
DFH808 (2026-03-10 00:19:32+00:00): Oh I remember that piece. I'll do the same in future for roads as well.
NeisAgent (2026-03-06 07:53:09+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google Maps or another Google mapping service as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google Maps or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-06 07:56:19+00:00): In this case, it seems the reported issue is false positive. 

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Best Regards,
Pascal
Wildsharky (2026-03-06 12:18:23+00:00): Revert of 179420337
NeisBot (2026-03-06 01:51:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 28 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1485871995 v1 | 28 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179421566
FajrAl (2026-03-07 06:16:48+00:00): This is a newbie mistake.
Ini hanya kesalahan dari pengguna baru.

Harap mengikuti tutorial interaktif Openstreetmap dengan tombol H di iD editornya.
NeisBot (2026-03-06 02:18:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 33 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1485871995 v2 | 28 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1485873556 v1 | 5 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179421949
NeisReview (2026-03-14 05:33:11+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179453681
NeisBot (2026-03-06 02:30:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 17 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/947155612 v3 | 15 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/8767439439 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179422112
NeisReview (2026-03-14 05:33:11+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179809564
NeisBot (2026-03-06 03:01:22+00:00): Hi patrix16, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 96% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 6 amenity(s)
- 2 building(s)
- 57 highway(s)
- 1 leisure(s)
- 5 name(s)
- 1 surface(s)
- 2 tourism(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179422551
NeisRevert (2026-03-06 07:23:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/179429948
where the comment is: "Revert vandalism"
Frans S (2026-03-10 11:06:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Accurately mapped. 
When an object shows no shadow, it is not a building. Don't map those.

Roofs sometimes appear to have a bend in them. This is due to the angle at which the images were taken. These roofs are simply rectangular and can be mapped with four nodes.
Best regards
jptolosa (2026-03-07 01:30:42+00:00): Hola, normalmente el nombre es distinto del "operador". Se debería poner en el nombre lo que diga algún letrero y sin abreviaciones.
Saludos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179422647
tguen (2026-03-06 06:29:06+00:00): I have reverted this ENTIRE CHANGESET. There are a lot of problems here, and frankly I'm tired of cleaning up your messes.

There is no such thing as "OMSI Jetboat Extersions" or even "OMSI Jetboat Excursions". You added unnecessary layer tags to building parts. You deleted building parts for no reason. You deleted the building tags from several buildings in what looks like an attempt to map them as parts without understanding how. 

Stop ignoring my comments. Read the wiki. Ask for help on the forums. Stop making messes by trying to map without taking the time to understand the right way to do it. I don't want to be a jerk, but I also don't want you continuing to make messes in every edit and ignore me asking you to fix them.
bobthebuilder423468 (2026-03-06 15:43:32+00:00): but there is omsi jetboat excursions lol #onlyusesonesource
tguen (2026-03-06 23:56:55+00:00): I couldn't find a source, but surely you will share yours with us...
bobthebuilder423468 (2026-05-31 17:15:06+00:00): after so long my proof is that it is a thing. it was named wrong though.
007Transformer (2026-03-06 09:07:25+00:00): Revert of 179417023
Wildsharky (2026-03-06 12:21:14+00:00): Revert of 179416843
NeisBot (2026-03-06 04:27:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1089747746 v2 | 7 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179424038
alaaan021 (2026-03-06 17:24:13+00:00): Olá. Não existe essa via sem nome cortando a avenida eda Abrantes Alcides. Pode exclui-lá! Tentei remover do mapa mas não achei a opção. 

Hello. There is no unnamed street intersecting "Avenida Eda Abrantes Alcides". You can delete it! I tried to remove it from the map but couldn't find the option.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-06 11:39:29+00:00): Hi Gannnku.

May we know the reason why you removed the name:ru and name:en  tag here?

Thanks.
eggie (2026-03-06 06:59:48+00:00): Dag foxy.. Probeer svp bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode.

Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-03-06 08:15:02+00:00): Info samengevoegd
b-jazz (2026-03-09 05:15:53+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13622035786 for an example of overlap.
NeisBot (2026-03-06 06:03:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13622038788 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Chiropractic center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-14 17:33:08+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179601077
JuanElDemografo (2026-03-06 16:17:15+00:00): Hi, I see that you requested review on this changeset. The tags you applied look fine, and I see that you already removed the duplicates from the other house.

If you ever have any questions, feel free to reach out to me or at community.openstreetmap.org. Happy mapping and welcome to osm!
bobthebuilder423468 (2026-03-06 15:32:28+00:00): dude you removed HALF of my edits (they were minor but still okay) one last chance then i will report you
tguen (2026-03-07 00:01:36+00:00): Yes I did. You make lots of messes and ignore me when I ask you to fix them. So now I'm using low effort fixes, meaning I revert ALL changes. Then I restore a few that are actually valid until I run out of patience for cleaning up after you.
meisoof (2026-03-07 23:38:59+00:00): a
meisoof (2026-03-07 23:39:48+00:00): don't know why you put EB Gilmore Stn onto Dawson Street; Im going to revert that
joel56dt (2026-03-08 19:17:18+00:00): Thank you
NeisBot (2026-03-06 06:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13622063544 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Chiropractic center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-14 17:33:11+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179869145
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Frans S (2026-03-07 08:57:05+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Your mappings are rather accurate. Well done.
However, you overlooked the round huts and the brown/gray buildings, which are to be mapped as well. The roofs are made of locally available leaves.
Best regards.
MassCartog (2026-03-06 15:29:08+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. There is no need to use the Name tag for things like "field" it's not for descriptions, just using the feature type field is enough. Do you mind going back and removing the incorrect name tag use from this changeset? Thanks

More info on the topic:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Frans S (2026-03-09 11:57:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
The buildings you mapped are accurately mapped. However, often includes the shadow.
You overlooked some round buildings and brown/gray rectangular buildings.
Best regards