piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-28 11:20:35+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11150033379

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Uri2sz (2023-08-28 11:33:05+00:00): dzięki ;)
NorthCrab (2023-08-28 12:02:08+00:00): :-)
sheldonelectric (2024-12-29 12:55:01+00:00): Καλησπέρα! Βλέπω ότι ασχολείσαι αποκλειστικά με τα Άσπρα Σπίτια και συμπεράνω ότι μένεις εκεί. 
Είχα μεγαλώσει εκεί και πέρασα το '12 να βάλω τα βασικά, μου ξέφυγαν όμως καταστήματα πίσω από ΙΚΑ και στο κανάλι. Αν θες, κάνε ένα κόπο...
eggie (2023-08-28 11:34:14+00:00): Ahh   Top....   
Ik had overigens al wat aangepast
stievo9997 (2023-08-28 11:36:34+00:00): Ja, ik had het gezien. Zodoende heb ik mijn toevoegingen alweer verwijderd. Aangezien je deze al had toegevoegd :)
eggie (2023-08-28 11:40:26+00:00): Oke...   Wellicht heb je wat aan de laatste sat foto van aug 
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=28-08-2022&loc=51.33947%2C5.947815%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-08-14&acqid=20230814_103051_PNEO-03_1_1%2C20230814_103109_PNEO-03_1_30&sensor=Pleiades-NEO
tastrax (2023-08-28 12:15:35+00:00): Hi there emilytrau - its also useful to split an address number like 17/6 into the two component parts  - unit 17 and the street number of 6. Cheers
emilytrau (2023-08-28 12:18:33+00:00): Thanks for the tip! :D
SomeoneElse (2023-09-01 09:59:00+00:00): Hello,
I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202778842 is the courtyard?  If so, it shouldn't have a "building=yes" tag on it, and the tags on the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16250401 will be used.
Cheers,
Andy
Awoobis (2023-09-03 13:26:20+00:00): To w końcu PSE operuje tą linią czy nie? Tag operator dalej jest, tylko dodałeś informację że to nie jest pse
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 03:41:41+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140566975
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-28 12:00:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184997709
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2184993507
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100041325
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100041204

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kartler175 (2023-08-29 11:07:02+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140535557
ralrei (2023-08-29 06:02:34+00:00): Warum hast Du leisure=pitch entfernt?
sport=soccer alleine stehend ist nicht ausreichend.
Die 2 Spielfelder werden nun nicht mehr angezeigt.
makmo (2023-08-29 07:02:51+00:00): habe ich auch schon bemerkt, bei der Ergänzung auf „Soccer „ wurde das leisure Merkmale irgendwie überschrieben. 
Werde ich noch abändern.
Wobei er bei mir die zwei Felder angezeigt hatte. Mal schaun…..
Danke für Deine Aufmerksamkeit!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 04:20:35+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140567713
habi (2023-08-28 14:40:44+00:00): Ciao Pierrolefou79

In this changeset [1] you have added a *lot* of buildings tagged with `type_toiture`, either `dure`, `indéterminée`, or `tôle`.

In OpenStreetMap we agreed to use (British) English tags, I guess in this case this should be something like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:material

Can you change this, or tell us what the three values mean exactly?

Greetings from Switzerland,
habi

PS; I'm here because of the tags showing up at http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm




[1]: As well as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140482576 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140318480
eggie (2023-08-28 12:51:36+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Alleen een naam doet niets in osm. Ook de aard van het bedrijf toevoegen is nodig.
Bv office=company of iets meer toegesneden.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-08-29 08:47:27+00:00): Officetag toegevoegd
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-28 12:30:23+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/843476162

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2023-08-28 19:00:46+00:00): Dag foo_bar  Ik ken het daar niet, maar het zal in ieder geval routeren.
Meestal zet ik bicycle=dismount op die trappen met zo'n gootje. Dat routeert dan ook voor fietsers.

MVG
eggie
foo_bar (2023-08-28 20:14:05+00:00): Bedankt dat je er naar hebt gekeken. Was mijn eerste liftsituatie.
Er zit al bicycle yes op de trappen, maar inderdaad dismount is netter. Ga ik aanpassen.
Chris Fleming (2023-08-31 22:05:32+00:00): Thank!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-31 05:25:45+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140616733
GerdP (2023-08-29 08:02:21+00:00): Korrektur: Die Fotos und Notizen entstanden am 3.7.2023
pesec (2023-08-29 07:46:39+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Данным пакетом правок вы присвоили полю значение сельскохозяйственное с указанием кукурузы как использование.
Но этот вариант использования имеет сезонное значение и может измениться в последствии. Не будете же вы каждый год обновлять данные?
Лучше такое обозначение не применять.
DiogoBaptista98 (2023-09-04 17:34:13+00:00): whats the source? whats the operator?
topolusitania (2023-09-04 18:47:24+00:00): https://www.frs-portugal.pt/pt/itinerario/cruzeiro-fluvial
L987 (2023-09-06 15:13:49+00:00): the source is my Gps tracker

several shipping companies present in the Terreiro do Paco terminal in Lisbon offer this route. I use yellow boat and other companies
Leo Slager (2023-08-28 22:38:45+00:00): Hoi Peter,
De 12 bus routerelaties zijn weer gerepareerd.
Kijk ook even naar die twee rotondes en hoe je die correct behoort op te knippen, nl bij iedere zijweg waar een routerelatie over loopt.
Route 06-79 is ook gerepareerd.
Met de role forward/backward blijft dat altijd een moeizaam karwei.
De overige routes zoals Pieterpad, Amstel Goldrace, etc moeten nog gerepareerd worden.
Kun je daar zelf naar kijken ?
Peter Elderson (2023-08-29 05:01:56+00:00): Aiaiai, beginnersfout, te gehaast geweest en vergeten het goed af te maken. Dank voor het repareren en ik kijk de rest zometeen na.
Peter Elderson (2023-08-29 20:31:18+00:00): Pieterpad was de reden dat ik had geknipt! Rotondes in een routerelatie, dat exporteert slecht als gpx, dwz hij exporteert het wel en het gpx-format staat het toe, maar voor de meeste toepassingen heb je een enkelvoudige lijn nodig, zonder lussen en zonder onderbrekingen. Mat fietsen heb je nog meer last, want daar zitten voortdurend dubbele routes in. Geen idee hoe routers daarmee omgaan als het via gpx getransporteerd is!
gscholz (2023-09-04 06:28:43+00:00): Hi Tuler,
this changeset has created errors the OSM database regarding self intersecting and overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-60.06193&lat=-3.11150&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=140494150

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on toe maps.

Can you please fix this? You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit bus routes properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-09-07 06:12:32+00:00): Hi Tuler,
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
GerdP (2023-08-29 08:02:32+00:00): Korrektur: Die Fotos und Notizen entstanden am 3.7.2023
Kai Johnson (2023-10-25 13:55:35+00:00): Hi! A couple of the islands in this changeset (ways 1202803575 and 1202803576) aren't rendering right now because they have semicolons in the natural=* value along with "coastline". The natural=coastline tag is special and can't have semicolons in it. You might make a separate congruent way with natural=bare_rock to get everything to render.
watmildon (2023-08-29 07:02:59+00:00): Hello!
There's also currently an few major issues with the ESRI address feed that you'll want to be on the lookout for so as to not push wonky data into the map. I've cleaned up the map around here but definitely be on the lookout. Details here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/esri-address-feed-update-has-some-issues/103132

More generally speaking, the address feed in Rapid often has many data points that are at the property center and not a the building where OSM tends to map things. These edits could be improved by moving the nodes to their respective buildings. It'll have the side benefit of making the addresses look as nice as the sidewalks and other fine mapping.
Petr Dlouhý (2023-11-20 08:42:36+00:00): There is no access restriction for bicycles in Wilsonova. Please be more careful with your taging.
jmilot (2023-11-20 14:30:29+00:00): Hi there,

Nobody on their right mind would however use their bikes on this elevated, highway-like way. How do you propose for it to be tagged so that the information is correctly forwarded to OSM data consumers?
Petr Dlouhý (2023-11-20 15:19:56+00:00): You are wrong, some people are using it reguraly. I would not advise riding there to anyone without enough experience, but OSM is map and it should stay with facts not what you would recommend to others.

I re-tagged it with bicycle=yes, because it is the only factually correct way. It is tagged as highway=primary which should. There are other tags which would describe the better the conditions of the road such as "width". I am not sure if there are for example tags referring to bussiness of the road.
Gonéo (2023-08-30 12:07:04+00:00): Bonjour, il y a une demande de revue sur le changement. Je n'ai pas de remarque particulière. La connexion permettra le routage piéton.
richlv (2024-01-20 12:08:56+00:00): I suspect https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202815903/history might not be power-related - it seems to be more water, sewage etc related.
HellMap (2024-01-20 13:10:04+00:00): Yeah, you are probably right. I didn't really look closer, but looks at the well nearby and what looks like outgasing pipes, it's probably a pumping/life station or something. Not sure though, so removed power tag.
literan (2023-08-28 17:10:58+00:00): а зачем landuse=religious с территории монастыря убирать? верну
Grass-snake (2023-08-28 17:51:09+00:00): Привет, хотел сделать всё в одном стиле. Больше не буду.

В мире всего 8108 amenity=monastery, из них только 832 с landuse=religious.
literan (2023-08-28 18:22:50+00:00): скорее повод добавить его на 7300 монастырей
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-08-30 09:37:20+00:00): Hi, you have created a lot of duplicated geometries of roads. Can you recheck and fix this
Dodko (2023-09-03 11:35:12+00:00): 1455 nepatrí do adresy
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331391347

https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/13543422?pos=49.268104,19.035353,18
filip769 (2023-09-04 12:18:40+00:00): v katastri je na pozemku dané súpisné číslo https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/kataster/detail/kataster/parcela-c/863041/3220_135?pos=49.268018,19.035363,21 neviem ako postupovať v takýchto prípadoch, radšej si nechám poradiť
Dodko (2023-09-04 14:43:14+00:00): Tak asi rozseknúť budovu ako je v katastri a severná časť rodinný dom 1201 a južná polyfunkčná budova 1455.

Pre budovu 1455 pridelili orientačné číslo Lipová 30 ale nezapísali polohu adresného bodu.
https://i2.paste.pics/P9H98.png
fx99 (2024-01-02 09:22:34+00:00): Hallo,
worauf beruht das Tagging kosher=yes?
Für "kosher" https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%BCdische_Speisegesetze gibt es sehr strenge Richtlinien, ich denke nicht, dass dies für Restaurants in G. der Fall ist.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 02:57:43+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140566268
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 04:44:29+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140568173
GerdP (2023-08-29 08:02:43+00:00): Korrektur: Die Fotos und Notizen entstanden am 3.7.2023
KristinaRose (2023-08-28 14:11:26+00:00): *Unela sam adrese objekata za Bačku Topolu (Zobnatica)
KristinaRose (2023-08-28 14:10:35+00:00): *Unela sam adrese objekata za Bačku Topolu (Zobnatica)
Jonathan Ng@ (2023-08-29 08:13:37+00:00): 终于有个高州的了😂
AnyaForger (2023-08-31 16:27:50+00:00): 🥲
rskedgell (2023-11-10 11:10:08+00:00): I am afraid that you edit introduced a number of tags which you may not have fully understood before using them, including highway=living_street, access=discouraged and maxspeed:type. Due to the number of errors introduced, I have reverted this changeset.

Please familiarise yourself with the documentation of tags before using them.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
Nancledra (2023-11-10 15:11:41+00:00): Anything to help stop satnav idiots using single lanes and some private roads as through routes.
rskedgell (2023-11-10 16:39:36+00:00): I understand the frustration caused by rat running traffic. The street on which I live was a rat run until a Low Traffic Neighbourhood modal filter, with a signed prohibition of motor vehicles was introduced.

However, we can only record facts in OpenStreetMap. Adding fictitious access restrictions and reclassifying highways in an attempt to break satnav routing is likely to be considered vandalism.

Of particular concern in this changeset, but not an exhaustive list:

w146337398 - this is a highway=unclassified, changing it to service would imply that it is an access road and probably not a public highway. I do not believe this to be the case.

highway=living_street - unless it is explicitly signed as a Home Zone (TSRGD diagram 886) or a Quiet Lane (diagram 884), then it is a highway=residential or highway=unclassified

Private roads should generally be access=private (often gated), or access=destination + ownership=private (not gated, open and routeable for deliveries, taxis, visitors, etc.). Neither should be treated as through routes by routers.

est_width - metres are the default unit, so need not be included. Using a tilde for a range of widths is undocumented and will result in the field being ignored as unparseable. I am not convinced that these roads are at any point as narrow as 1.5 metres.

You added access=destination to a BOAT (Byway Open to All Traffic). It's a public *right* of way, which already had the correct access tags.

Use of discouraged as an access tag - hgv=discouraged is fine if (and only if) it is signed as "unsuitable for HGVs" (TSRGD diagram 820A).

You can find the road signs referred to above in Schedule 11 TSRGD 2016. These signs can also be added to OSM as nodes on the highway at the point closes to the actual sign, e.g. "Unsuitable for HGVs" would be traffic_sign=GB:820A + hgv=discouraged
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/362/schedule/11/made
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign
Nancledra (2023-11-10 16:56:15+00:00): These appear to be the only means of applying the 'Quiet Lane' denomination as a workaround, since it does not exist in OSM. The designation is signposted, and means foot traffic, farm traffic, pedestrians, animals, cyclists etc. etc. are to be expected around every corner of the single track lanes with limited passing places. The lanes in question are on the national cycle network as well since they are byways, obviously entirely unsuitable as through routes. In Cornwall it is not uncommon for local lanes to be grassy and rutted, with overhanging trees causing width limitations. It is not financially feasible for the Council to mark the many thousand lanes with 'local access' signs, and was not a problem before satnav. A local bridge has been damaged several times by large vehicles (goods, camper vans, caravans) going down these unsuitable roads and getting stuck, at great local disruption. Discussion with the drivers shows they were blindly following satnav directions. For satnav systems that take data from OSM, there is no way of ensuring this completely unsuitable route is not suggested rather than the main signposted A and B roads into Truro. Local feeling is running high, with others in discussion with Google Maps. The lane to the A39 is a private road for farm access, now regularly attempted by vans that then discover they can't make the corner or narrow gaps between gateposts.
rskedgell (2023-11-10 17:34:31+00:00): I am no fan of "satnav idiots" either and will do what I can to help, but within OSM's rules.

Some of these problems are very difficult or impossible to solve, unless Cornwall CC bring in additional restrictions with traffic orders.

There is no street side imagery of the affected roads available with an OSM-compatible licence. If you or other local residents are able to capture and upload imagery with the Mapillary app, that could be very helpful.

For narrow roads, you can use narrow=yes and lane_markings=no. If possible, add est_width=*, or better still width=* (but this requires using a tape measure) with a single value at the narrowest point. You may need to split the road if there's a distinct narrow section. Adding lanes=1 and passing_places=yes or passing_places=no (as appropriate) may help, together with the positions of passing places as highway=passing_place nodes.

Capturing the smoothness=* values for potholed sections may help. I find the StreetComplete app (Android only) is very good for this. You can split a road in the app if the smoothness changes significantly along the road.

If there are red triangular warning signs (and I appreciate that there may not be, due to Cornwall CC's budget constraints), you can tag both the sign and use the appropriate hazard=* tag on the affected section of road. See:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/362/schedule/2/made
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hazard#Traffic_hazards

If the three parish councils in this area write to some of the satnav providers like TomTom, that might help.
Nancledra (2023-11-10 17:42:17+00:00): Thanks. A lot of the terminology is US-centric as well, so the Wiki wasn't too helpful. Some elements that superficially refer to the same aspect of a road also appear to be duplicated or superseded, with conflicting notes about which to use. I realise trying to fulfil the spirit doesn't necessarily comply with the letter. The lanes would obviously be unsuitable to a driver using a map and brain, which the signage system has yet to catch up with (if they look at signs).
rskedgell (2023-11-10 18:02:07+00:00): A quick though about roads signed as Quiet Lanes before I start the weekend...
You could add note="Quiet Lane" and/or something like designation=quiet_lane (but this could conflict with PRoW tagging) or the undocumented traffic_intervention=quiet_lane (tag used for some school streets and LTNs). That way, it's clear to other mappers why it's been tagged as a highway=living_street.

Have a good weekend.
martinst (2023-08-29 15:26:15+00:00): Revertiert in Changeset: 140547667
FennecusZerda (2024-03-28 12:53:56+00:00): Hei Noen. Det er mange avkjørsler og kryss som ikke er koblet til fortauene du har lagt til her. Er du med å rette på dette? Hilse, Trond
Noen (2024-03-29 19:01:25+00:00): Hei! Er siste som har redigert fortauene i Bodø, fordi jeg allerede har hatt en dugnad på å forsøke koble de til alle kryss og avkjørsler, og på å tagge de om fra sykkelvei som de originalt var tagget som.
Men skjønner jeg ikke er kommet helt i mål.
jengelh (2023-08-29 14:42:40+00:00): Warum construction:note noch stehen lassen?
Ah, never mind. StreetComplete mal wieder..
Filip009 (2023-09-01 08:58:12+00:00): Zdravím, do mena objektu sa nevpisuje jeho pomenovanie ale jeho názov. To, že sa jedná o stojan na bicykle je dané tagom amenity=bicycle_parking. To, že má kapacitu 3 bicykle sa dáva do tagu capacity=3.

A pôvodne to bolo parkovanie pre autá. Parkovanie pre autá sa tam už teda nenachádza? Keďže ste to zmenili na parkovanie pre bicykle.
martinst (2023-08-29 15:25:58+00:00): Hallo baldhat,
in OSM werden Wege nicht einfach gelöscht sondern mit Lifecylcle-Prefixen versehen, siehe OSM-Wiki. 
Teile der von dir gelöschten Wege sind eindeutig im Luftbild sichtbar. 
Revertiert in Changeset: 140547667
baldhat (2023-08-29 15:58:47+00:00): Ich war vor einer guten Woche dort Wandern, der westliche Teil bei der Markierung existiert nicht (vielleicht auch nur nicht mehr). Es ist sehr steiles und gefährliches Gelände.
Wenn es nicht direkt gelöscht werden kann sollte es über die Lifecycle-Prefixe als nicht begehbar angezeigt werden, aber Komoot nutzt diesen  Weg noch für das routing was ich für sehr gefährlich halte, da wir auf der Suche nach dem Weg schnell in gefährliches Gelände kamen
martinst (2023-08-29 17:09:08+00:00): Komoot stellt soweit ich weiß keine Wege dar, die mit abandoned:highway=path etc. gekennzeichnet sind. 
Du kannst gerne den Weg entsprechend ändern. 
Ich mache sowas nicht ohne vor Ort gewesen zu sein um den Zustand auf der gesamten Länge des Pfades zu beurteilen.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 02:17:22+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140565683
lefuturiste (2023-10-29 16:30:14+00:00): fixme= added on this object solved on object https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/835733164 by changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143320359
hlfan (2023-08-30 12:11:09+00:00): Gehören auf Auf- oder Abfahrtsrampen auch die Tunnelnamen? Also soll Linie 22761891 auch den Namen haben?
PPete2 (2023-08-30 12:52:51+00:00): Sehr gute Frage, das betrifft z.b. auch die beiden Linzer Tunnels der A7, sowie etwaige Nebenwege wie z.b Radwege oder Gehsteige durch einen Tunnel. Dieses Detail wurde noch nirgends diskutiert. In der Praxis wenn ich mir diverse Tunnels und auch Brücken anschaue werden nur die Hauptweg benamt. Also Rampen und Nebenwege eher nicht benamen - was meinst du?
hlfan (2023-09-07 21:03:26+00:00): Bei der A7 hast du https://osm.org/way/317451108 so gelassen, also ich glaub ich würde nur den Hauptwege den Namen geben, das müssen aber nicht Wege in einem Straßenverlauf sein und können auch Rampen sein - Stichwort Hochstraße Inzersdorf. Zu parallel verlaufenden Wegen würde ich sagen: Namen setzen, außer es ist eine Einmündung in einen durchgehenden Weg, der dann stattdessen den Namen tragen sollte. Aber da hab ich noch nicht wirklich ein schönes teilendes Kriterium gefunden. Die Radwege der Linzer Voest-Brücke würd ich z.B. nicht benennen, weil es teilweise eigene Brücken sind.
PPete2 (2023-09-07 21:21:43+00:00): Das Tunneltagging der Auf/Abfahrten in Linz hab ich ehrlich gesagt übersehen. tunnel:name könnte man also dort auch komplett löschen, sonst steht das ja irgendwie auch im Wiederspruch zum ausgemachten Tagging per name-Tag und nicht in tunnel:name.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-30 04:36:10+00:00): Reverted by DWG due to poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140568014
aeszter (2023-08-29 09:23:25+00:00): Gibt's irgendwo eine Diskussion zu survey:date vs check_date? Ich persönlich finde die Dominanz nicht so besonders deutlich (34% laut Taginfo), aber wenn wir survey:date bevorzugen, sollten wir einen Bug bei Streetcomplete aufmachen, sonst wird das Reverting zur Dauerbeschäftigung.