piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ctown1875 (2024-06-03 22:07:20+00:00): Thank you.  I guess I am not following what you are suggesting.  Should I adjust something I uploaded? Also why don't I see any of the data I uploaded on the map when I hit the link you sent?
Xvtn (2024-06-04 04:02:43+00:00): My suggestions were mostly referring to the roads you added called "x access" such as "south canyon access". I'm asking if that's the actual real name of the road? And if not, that data is still valuable but we can put it under other tags as appropriate. We just shouldn't use the name tag to describe a feature. The name tag should only be for the actual name.
Xvtn (2024-06-04 04:05:42+00:00): Regarding map updates, how long it takes for updates to appear depends on what map you're looking at. For openstreetmap.org, an update should appear within 10-30 mins. But if you're using some third party app or something, updates can range from near-instant to months or years. What is your map of interest?
Xvtn (2024-09-05 22:18:26+00:00): Howdy again. I'm looking through some of these again - Looking at satellite imagery I'm starting to wonder if many of these exist at all in reality. Did you have any other source other than tracing The National Map lines? I'm thinking in order to have these in OSM (in this case) they should be verified with another source such as satellite imagery, Strava heatmap, or in-person survey.
Ctown1875 (2024-09-07 20:48:50+00:00): Yes I have used my own lifelong experience as well as my friends, relatives, Boy Scout troops, forest rangers etc. They are physical landmarks for hikers, hunters, Boy Scouts, forest service rangers etc. that have been used for many decades.  I have witnessed in person countless times what is questioned that is uploaded to the map and so have countless others. Many take photos of the gooseneck tree with their families or otherwise when hiking or motorcycling to gunsight peak up winter canyon. It's all legitimate on ground reality.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-29 22:50:39+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11259596147
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11259596146
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11259596145
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11259596144
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11259596143
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182170831
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182170832
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182170833
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182170834
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1182170835

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-05-30 04:15:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2024-05-30 07:19:20+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152018851
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-30 07:19:55+00:00): Please don't add fictional data!

Thanks.
eggie (2024-05-30 11:07:53+00:00): Dag Verder,

Kijk eens naar de conditional tags. Dan kun je aangeven op welk tijdstip je ergens niet mag komen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2024-05-30 07:18:24+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152018820
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-30 07:18:41+00:00): Please don't add fictional data!

Thanks.
NeisBot (2024-05-29 23:24:24+00:00): Hi FoFlam, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1287829957

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-30 07:17:28+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152018789
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-30 07:17:43+00:00): Please don't add fictional data!

Thanks.
NeisBot (2024-05-29 23:24:25+00:00): Hi FoFlam, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1287829130

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
NeisBot (2024-05-30 07:16:37+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152018758
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-30 07:16:58+00:00): Please don't add fictional data!

Thanks.
KiloThree (2024-05-30 03:20:12+00:00): Did you intend to also edit some streets in Belgium?
0x0000 (2024-05-30 14:12:18+00:00): Yes, apologies, StreetComplete lumped these in a single set for some reason.
Jordi MF (2024-05-29 23:49:03+00:00): Se revierte porque ha susituido incorrectament el nombre de numerosas playas a sabiendas que los nombres no son correctos.
Además, el usuario que ha editado está bloqueado y, por tanto, no puede seguir mapeando con nuevos usuarios según las condiciones y términos de uso de OSM.
Jordi MF (2024-05-29 23:50:52+00:00): No creo que sea aceptable mapear correctamente e incorrectamente a la vez para evitar que detectemos el vandalismo que comete con la toponimia local porque no acepta que la toponimia oficial sea en catalán/valenciano.
archie (2024-05-30 11:53:21+00:00): Hej, du tillför mycket nyttig metainformation till butiker m m. Så har du även gjort här (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4546228891/history). Saken är bara den att affären stängde för mer än ett halvt år sedan. Jag talade själv med innehavaren (om detaljhandelns vedermödor m m) innan han stängde ner butiken. Nu är det din sak om du onödigtvis vill ödsla tid på att via nätet söker fram information på affärer som inte längre finns. Men du tillade även - som du nu vet falskeligen - taggen check-date som skall indikera att du bekräftar att affären finns kvar. Man kan med andra ord inte sätta tilltro till din taggning i denna del. Det vore kanske bäst att du även - vid sidan om ditt föredömliga arbete i övrigt - kollade upp att saker fortfarande - i verkligheten - finns på plats. Det är det check_date-taggen är till för.
archie (2024-05-30 11:59:54+00:00): Kompletteringsvis kan jag uppge att Happy Vegans tidigare affärslokaler verkar vara uppdelade och inhyser numera en frisör (konfimerad) samt vad som verkar vara (inte konfimerad) en tatoo-butik. Nu kan du börja googla...
❤️‍🔥 (2024-05-30 10:01:12+00:00): Hi, thanks for your recent edits. hgv=no means all trucks are banned, i.e. anyone over 3.5 tonnes. Is that what the signage here says? 

If you just want to tag the maximum weight, there is an example here which explains how to map the complicated NZ signage: https://osm.wiki/Key:maxaxleload
ChristinaM21 (2024-05-30 01:22:11+00:00): Adding the new school being built, restaurants that are near by, sidewalk, updated point names at certain areas and building.
seattlefyi (2024-06-01 03:27:01+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! It looks like you edited a few different kinds of things, and for most had small differences with how I'd expect in OSM. It's a good start though! The standalone laundry and deli nodes looked good! Main things I noticed were: 1. No need to describe something in its name ("Building") unless it actually has a name. 2. The buildings and parking lots could more closely follow the area outline in imagery. 3. The Arirang restaurant was already in OSM. Hope to see more edits!
felipeeugenio (2024-05-30 12:22:09+00:00): Hola.
El apellido es Echenique... sin ñ
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152011684
danieldegroot2 (2024-08-03 13:47:28+00:00): Hey SerendipitySue,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

I added the public bookcase and misc. details for the bicycle repair.
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12090424210
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11943535043

If you have any feedback, or something is missing, let me know.

It would be useful if you could add a clear, close-up, up-to-date image of the public bookcase and specify what kind of books the public bookcase is intended for (children and/or adults).
https://mapcomplete.org/bookcases.html?z=17.9&lat=42.79634449808941&lon=-73.82522892206578#node/12090424210

Regards,

Daniel
eggie (2024-05-30 04:16:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
MxxCon (2024-05-31 05:44:58+00:00): Hello.
When updating old business to a new one, it's much better to update the existing node/point to contain the current information, instead of deleting the old one and creating a new one.
Updating the existing node preserves history of that object, which might be useful to refer to in the future. But if you delete+create, that history gets deleted too.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152012504
Norbs17 (2024-05-31 15:30:15+00:00): Thank you MxxCon. My thought process at the time was best to delete it as the one I deleted that is no longer there was in an incorrect location on the map. However I understand now I could have changed the information and also moved the node, rather than deleting the node entirely.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152012504
Norbs17 (2024-05-31 15:31:09+00:00): Oh wait, I realize now this was probably referring to Cafe Rum and not La Raza Cafe. So yeah, will do for the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152012504
NeisBot (2024-05-30 03:18:24+00:00): Hi Mason F, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1287904706

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-01 07:22:05+00:00): Thanks for your mapped beach.

#HappyMapping
Mason F (2024-06-02 06:15:10+00:00): The beach is artificially made. It a sandy area by the lake. The camp has a sandcastle building contest here each week during their summer season.

Checking this again I realize there is also a Sand tag. Would that be better?
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-02 06:36:42+00:00): I think both variants are possible in this case. Either as a beach or as a sandy area.
Xvtn (2024-06-02 21:49:35+00:00): That field (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29267479) is too small to play American football on. I think they use it for marching band practice or something.
Lostmonkey (2025-03-03 17:43:49+00:00): Hej. Jeg stiller et par spørgsmål dine cykelgade-ændringer i forum. Giv gerne dit besyv med omkring dine overvejelser bag ændringer af adgangsforhold og hastighedsbegrænsning: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/hvad-er-en-cykelgade-hastighedsgraense/105568
miluethi (2024-07-18 11:44:33+00:00): Lana,
Your buildings shapes are far too big compared to the aerial imagery. Please narrow down your shapes to match exactly the imagery and don't combine several single buildings into one shape.
Thank you.
literan (2024-06-02 21:05:33+00:00): не надо прилеплять здания к дорогам и другим линейным объектам
Mazda05 (2024-05-31 09:05:12+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
Mazda05 (2024-05-31 09:05:09+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-30 19:17:36+00:00): Read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Changeset reverted in part or full.  Access tags should be used instead.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152051586
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-05-30 04:23:52+00:00): Source: https://ninhtrung.ninhhoa.khanhhoa.gov.vn/vi/quy-hoach-su-dung-dat-211/lay-y-kien-gop-y-du-thao-quy-hoach-tinh-khanh-hoa-thoi-ky-2021-2030-tam-nhin-den-nam-2050
Mazda05 (2024-05-31 09:05:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
Mazda05 (2024-05-31 09:05:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-30 04:16:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3073672651
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084212803

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mazda05 (2024-05-31 09:05:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
Mazda05 (2024-05-31 09:05:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
BCNorwich (2024-05-30 05:43:45+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've somehow moved a Cross Rail junction node and joined it to a footpath, I've reverted this change.

What are you trying to achieve, can I help? If you are testing how OSM works, please don't upload the test as OSM is a live worldwide database. Such changes could seriously affect map rendering and routing.

Regards Bernard.
RedGreenBlue09 (2024-05-30 04:24:13+00:00): Source: https://ninhtrung.ninhhoa.khanhhoa.gov.vn/vi/quy-hoach-su-dung-dat-211/lay-y-kien-gop-y-du-thao-quy-hoach-tinh-khanh-hoa-thoi-ky-2021-2030-tam-nhin-den-nam-2050
yelisey90 (2024-05-30 07:59:07+00:00): reverted by empty_child: already mapped, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1062718406
yelisey90 (2024-05-30 07:59:49+00:00): reverted: already mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11733767964
Ilovemap1999 (2024-05-30 04:57:48+00:00): why did you delete "oneway=yes" tag, any envidences?
muralito (2024-08-13 23:01:11+00:00): Hi. Please check again the sources you are using. They are outdated. This link is not here anymore.
Palary (2024-08-14 10:18:03+00:00): Hi Muralito, Thank you for feedback and making the corrections.
Albe_ (2024-05-30 12:00:39+00:00): Hei, katselin uusia muokkauksia Tampereen alueella ja huomasin, että uusi väylä 1287928372 näyttää oudolta muodon ja tagien puutteen takia. Voisitko tarkistaa? Kiitos!
tila89 (2024-05-30 12:32:07+00:00): Moro, sinne oli jotain ylimääräsiä viivoja näköjään vahingossa tullu. poistetu turhat.
Filip009 (2024-05-31 18:59:48+00:00): Zdravím, na katedrále sa tieto wikidata už nachádzajú https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82143241
miluethi (2024-06-01 20:09:41+00:00): Cat,

Your buildings shapes are far bigger than the imagery showing. I'm going to delete them all.

Please adjust your buildings to the sat imagery.

Thank you.
eggie (2024-05-30 10:47:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Tip bicycle=no is default op een wandelpad.  Een wandelpad heeft een G7 bord. Wanneer dat niet het geval is dan highway=path taggen. Evt met bicycle=yes of no

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-30 08:28:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152016233
JS Bédard (2024-06-03 19:19:32+00:00): Cette route est privée pour les forestières? Je vois qu'un noeud "barrière" a été ajouté? Les gens ne peuvent circuler à ce endroit?
Luc Chouinard (2024-06-04 01:03:11+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui ça semble le cas, mon information date de août 2021. j'ai ajouté le nœud, dernièrement,  parce que ça semble mieux supporté par les applications de carte. Mais le pont était déjà avec accès limité. Si la situation a changé depuis il faudrait corriger. J'ai ajouter des photos sur mapillary, dont une prise depuis la route forestière 403. Il y a un panneau stipulant: "RESOLUT

Propriété privée
Circulation interdite

À la demande des gestionnaires fauniques nous devons limiter l'accès au territoire uniquement pour les activités d'aménagement forestier"
JS Bédard (2024-06-04 01:43:44+00:00): Parfait merci pour les précisions
JS Bédard (2024-06-04 01:52:37+00:00): Je viens de vérifier sur mapillary pour voir les photos mais je vois pas de tracé enregistré sur la 403, avez-vous un lien, sinon est-ce que le tracé est censé être publique? Merci
JS Bédard (2024-06-04 01:55:28+00:00): C'est dommage que ce soit fermé pourtant la bande privée de terrain est minuscule environ maximum 400m ensuite ça tombe dans la réserve faunique saint Maurice et le chemin connecte plus au sud
Luc Chouinard (2024-06-04 02:10:31+00:00): Ça prends un certain temps, ils font du floutage pour les visages, ... 

Peut-être des problèmes de braconnage, quad sur des chemins non permis, aussi il semble y avoir des chalets/maison sur le bord du St-Maurice.

Je vais te laisser un commentaire pour une autre portion. Je me question concernant l'utilisation de route tertière
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 18:14:19+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076093762/history has PFM:garmin_type = 0x2b01 that was added in this edit
Can you remove this tag or replace by more clear one? It looks like debris from GPS trace import and if there is some uyseful info in it retagging it may be useful (and if there is no useful info there then removing it would be a good idea)

Sorry for bothering about an ancient edit, but maybe you remember something.
ricco2712 (2024-05-30 06:12:14+00:00): actually in Georgia. barely
LudovicG (2024-11-23 17:11:25+00:00): Bonjour, je ne comprends pas ce mini_roundabout connecté à aucune route (alors que l'on a déjà bien un junction=roundabout sur le cercle/way du giratoire.
Langlaeufer (2024-05-30 08:31:03+00:00): hallo JuanCarlos
ich nehme noch motorcar und motorcycle raus
Luzandro (2024-09-24 11:55:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4449404
JLZIMMERMANN (2024-06-05 13:54:35+00:00): Bonjour,
Je suis surpris par le prologement de la ligne 1 vers l'est car cela n'apparait ni dans le PDF en ligne ni l'application interactive https://maps.mybus.io/bollene/voyager/plan-du-reseau/
Y-a-t-il une réseau de l'extension sur le chemin de la levade ?
Patchi (2024-06-05 16:16:40+00:00): Bonsoir Jean-Louis,

Je comprends ton étonnement. Toutefois je n'ai fait, dans ce cas, que corriger la cohérence de la ligne 1 sans remettre en cause les changements (les arrêts de bus n'étaient pas tous au bon endroit dans la relation PTv2).
Donc je suis bien incapable de te donner plus de précision quant au prolongement de la ligne 1. Il va falloir voir le changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152000912 et poser la question à l'utilisateur https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/adni978.

Cordialement,

Patchi.
Ritam Saha (2025-08-29 17:39:54+00:00): As far as I understand, the naming convention in OSM discourage abbreviations such as Rd, for road. It name should have the full word "Road" instead of Rd.
Also, although I couldn't see the whole thing clearly as I was in the car, but the street sign clearly uses the word Road. So I hope you or someone from the Ola team reviews these.
contrapunctus (2024-06-13 08:02:44+00:00): Hey, sahilister. What's the source for this?
sahilister (2024-06-14 09:16:35+00:00): Hello, a mix of various news articles for name/area and video added here https://www.iimj.ac.in/institute/permanent-campus by them. 

There's another set of master plan but I don't have the link to it as of now.
Discostu36 (2024-05-31 21:07:18+00:00): Zwei Gebäude haben normalerweise nicht dieselbe Hausnummer. Sind die verbunden? Oder hat doch eines von beiden einen Buchstaben-Zusatz?
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-30 08:36:31+00:00): Hi! When adding a building, try to follow a building footprint that matches the geometry. Cheers!
habi (2024-08-08 11:30:53+00:00): Ciao nomau.

Hier hast du https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11944274034 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11944274033 beide als A.Lehmann Elektro AG erfasst. 
Laut https://lehmann.ch/filialen/ ist die Filiale 'nur' an der Tellstrasse 4.
Ist das Duplikat bewusst?

Gruss,
habi
miluethi (2024-07-03 22:48:45+00:00): Fawn,

Your building shapes are far too big compared with the satellite imagery. I'm going to delete them.
Ilovemap1999 (2024-05-30 07:38:32+00:00): Please respect data integrity that in the reality motorcycle can travel in this tunnel.
Max-Kritic (2024-05-30 11:21:05+00:00): Peux-tu respecter les multipolygon ?
eggie (2024-05-30 10:50:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-30 08:23:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152019085
Intrinsical (2024-06-02 23:31:55+00:00): Hello, could you please explain why you deleted this object? Thank you.
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-03 05:14:43+00:00): Please see the mentioned changesets. The initial Node was around 0,0000 0,0000.

Now the position has been corrected.
eggie (2024-05-30 13:23:46+00:00): Je vraagt feedback  
Lastig... Zijn die wegen er nog.
Je kunt ook access=no toevoegen als niemand er mag komen.
De amenity=parking kun je beter verwijderen.
Wanneer een bedrijf sluit dan zal het adres toch gewoon blijven bestaan?
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152019155

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-30 13:26:25+00:00): Wellicht access=private op de toegangswegen als je er niet mag komen.
De parkeerplaats met operator kan gewoon als vlak van de kaart



Het adres heb ik nog even hersteld.
Als een bedrijf sluit blijft het adres achter.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-31 08:45:15+00:00): De construction verwijderd. Hier worden toch geen wegen aangepegd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-31 11:49:13+00:00): Typo aangelegd
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-30 08:21:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152019604
eggie (2024-05-30 11:02:25+00:00): Dag  Arjo  Je pad heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse en verboden met de andere wegen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-30 18:22:53+00:00): Typo verbonden..
nevw (2024-05-31 08:16:29+00:00): Hi, multipolygons are invalid with outers joined this way.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.99843&lat=-27.64484&zoom=15

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Try instead to use building parts...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part

...or you can just have simple polygons for each part of a building instead of a multipolygon
nevw (2024-06-05 22:04:12+00:00): I have fixed these
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-30 08:20:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152019858
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-30 08:37:09+00:00): Hi! When adding a building, try to follow a building footprint that matches the geometry. Cheers!
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-05-31 17:12:12+00:00): Hi, please use Maa-amet's imagery in Estonia. It's usually very precise. There is currently an offset to it. 

I assume it's an attempt to fix https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4270175 ?