piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (2023-01-07 23:36:55+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Shasta_County,_California
Warin61 (2023-01-12 05:56:27+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

One of the harder things to do are multipolygon relations.
The relation 15097195 - building - is not right .. the outer ways 'share segments'. In this instance I would not have a relation ... I'd simply have a single way around the whole thing...
For the error see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.27087&lat=-37.77342&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Skip1305 (2023-01-12 23:56:32+00:00): Fixed.  Thanks for the tip.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (2023-01-07 23:36:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Shasta_County,_California
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (2023-01-07 23:43:10+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Shasta_County,_California
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (2023-01-07 23:43:27+00:00): Note duplicate addresses on some apartment complexes that need units surveyed
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (2023-01-07 23:53:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Shasta_County,_California
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (2023-01-07 23:54:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Shasta_County,_California
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Tomas_J (2025-06-07 09:23:56+00:00): Zdar, prosim, ked kreslis samostatne chodniky, nezabudaj na prilahlej ceste na zmenu sidewalk=* na sidewalk=separated. Nasiel som to nespravne napr. na chodniku Way: 1128097896 a ceste Way: Prievidzská (23563377).
aceman444 (2025-06-07 09:31:34+00:00): Dakujem za upozornenie. V dnesnej dobe to tak aj robim, ale samozrejme mi moze nejaka cesta ujst.
Tomas_J (2025-06-07 10:34:15+00:00): Jj, opravim. A mozem este jednu vec? Ked kreslis priechod ako je napriklad tu [1], mohol by si ho nakreslit presne ako je v reale, t. j. iba po node [2] a zvysok dat ako chodnik? Problem je, ze ked sa nakresli az po chodnik [3], tak niekto tam potom moze dat na node [3] napr. cez streetcompleet obrubnik (odpovie na otazku, ci ma priechod obrubnik) a takto zamedzi navigaciu po vozickarom po prilahlom chodniku. Tiez napr. nevidomemu hlasi priechod skor ako v skutocnosti nan vstupi. Viem, ze je to celkom mikromaping a otrava to robit az tak podrobne, ale mam par nevidiacich uzivatelov, pre ktorych je to dolezite (a asi aj pre vozickarov). 

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/773552387#map=19/48.713255/18.538247)
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/773552387#map=19/48.713255/18.538247
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7220554786
Tomas_J (2025-06-07 10:34:50+00:00): ...v tom priklade to kreslil kayle, ale videl som to rozne inde aj od teba. :)
aceman444 (2025-06-07 10:53:44+00:00): Zda sa mi, ze 1 a 2 su rovnake linky. Ale chapem, co myslite. Len ma to strasne nebavi sekat priechody este na take male kusky :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-11 18:30:37+00:00): Is there a reason you deleted a bunch of roads in this changeset?
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-12 10:34:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131180818 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by user The Siren Hunter's as they contained lots of unexplained deletions and node displacements
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
clay_c (2023-02-02 22:40:08+00:00): Hi Adam and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

While Orting may be considered a city by the state of Washington, it is not a city for OSM purposes. On OSM, we classify places as cities, towns, villages or hamlets based on their population and regional prominence. With a population of less than 10,000, Orting is properly classified as a village according to US tagging guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Tags#Places

Your other edits look great! Let me know if you have any questions.

Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132021072
user_3022894 (2023-01-17 09:33:36+00:00): Hallo Streetview247,

erst mal - vielen Dank für deine Änderungen hier. Es ist sehr schön, dass du die Bürgersteige in Solingen als einzelne Wege einträgst, vielen Dank dafür.

Allerdings müssen hierbei ein paar Kleinigkeiten beachtet werden.

Ich weiß nicht, ob du dich schon mal mit dem Bürgersteigtagging beschäftigt hast: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gehsteig#B)_Gehsteig_als_eigenst%C3%A4ndige_Linie

In Solingen haben ganz viele Straßen das Tag "sidewalk" (sidewalk=left, right oder "both"). Sobald aber ein Bürgersteig jetzt als eigenständige Linie gezeichnet wird, muss das an der Straße befindliche "sidewalk"-Tag unbedingt geändert werden! Ansonsten haben wir eine Doppelung. 

Sobald beide Bürgersteigseiten separat kartiert sind (oder auch ggf. nur eine Seite, wenn nur eine vorhanden ist), muss an der Straße selbst das Tag sidewalk=separate und idealerweise auch noch foot=use_sidepath angebracht werden. Ansonsten funktioniert das Fußgängerrouting nicht bzw. nicht richtig. 

Auf diese Bedingung ist unbedingt zu achten. Wenn du das bisher noch nicht wusstest, ist das nicht schlimm. Ich würde dich aber bitten, das bei zukünftigen Bürgersteig-Eintragungen unbedingt zu berücksichtigen. Ansonsten entsteht hier viel Mehrarbeit für uns.

Und noch eine kleine Bitte habe ich:
Wenn du schon die Bürgersteige als separate Linie einträgst, dann nutze auf den Linien zusammen mit highway=footway bitte auch das Zusatzattribut footway=sidewalk (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk), um die Gehwege als Bürgersteige zu kennzeichnen. Diese Gehwegeklasse ist im Editor auch anwählbar, ganz einfach unter dem Namen "Bürgersteig" zu finden.

Falls du Fragen hast, stehe ich dir gerne zur Verfügung.

Im Übrigen ist gesamte Gehweg-Kartierung einer Stadt eine ziemlich großflächige Änderung. Kennst du evtl. das OSM-Forum schon? Dort besprechen wir solch weitreichende Änderungen i. d. R. vorher, bevor wir sie durchführen. Vielleicht wäre das ja auch etwas für dich.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56

Viele Grüße
Lukas
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:03:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Warin61 (2026-03-22 00:39:23+00:00): This multipolygon is now fixed.
No share segments. 

I have also combined ways so now only 3 members - reduced data bloat.
❤️‍🔥 (2026-03-22 04:35:11+00:00): thanks boss 🫡
盖子哥 (2024-07-18 04:59:30+00:00): 哈喽，朋友你好，我发现你在这里编辑了自行车线路。但是我看您的给的线路名为环线，但是目前的关系并没有成环线，我可以对你的线路做一些修改，让他成为完美的环线吗，我很乐意和你讨论关于自行车线路的问题，我也会绘制这个方面的内容。
b-holdet (2023-07-19 11:22:34+00:00): Hvilket punkt er korrekt?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9951319504

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9105172638
b-holdet (2023-07-19 11:23:10+00:00): Fra note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3787956
mikini (2023-07-19 17:14:51+00:00): Halløjsa, ja der er da lidt redundans.

Redningsnummeret på Esbjerg Brygge (9951319504) er den korrekte A 785, den på Esbjerg Strand/øen (9105172638) er A 786. Jeg har rettet det i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138727156.

Se billede af A 786 fra åbningen af Maritimt Center på https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aTFSmntulJ3QL6hAPheC2TgQr67a2uKO, eller søg den frem på den officielle redningsnummer-hjemmeside https://www.redningsnummer.dk/#korteksempler.

Mærkeligt nok vises ingen af de to på Trygfondens side (som ellers anbefales) https://www.respektforvand.dk/forebyg-ulykker/find-livreddere.

Elgaards analyseside for redningsnumre (https://osm.elgaard.net/) ser ud til at have mistet forbindelsen til sin datakilde, så den viste heller ikke at der var et problem.

Jeg tilføjer dog kun dem jeg ved selvsyn har observeret i felten, da vilkårene for de officielle data er ikke forenelig med OSM (https://www.redningsnummer.dk/#termsandconditions).
b-holdet (2023-07-20 16:16:36+00:00): Helt perfekt. Tak.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-01-08 02:51:59+00:00): Arrêtez immédiatement. Ce n'est pas du tout la place pour faire es blague ou des concepts. C'est du vandalisme.
Margoulinot (2023-12-16 15:03:45+00:00): Could you give a name and/or description to the attraction? thanks !
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-07 12:35:34+00:00): Is highway=footway really justified here?

If yes, then it is surely access=no / =private at least?
MacLondon (2023-12-07 13:16:37+00:00): Which footway are you referring to?
MacLondon (2023-12-07 13:37:19+00:00): I think you must have been referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1122042226. The highway=footway tag was added in error. I have now removed the errant tag.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-07 21:07:24+00:00): yes, exactly, I meant this one (maybe there is some way to service this cables but...)

thanks for a fix!
bxl-forever (2023-01-08 09:59:45+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for adding a restaurant.

I think there is a problem in the way you are using Organic Maps.

When you add a point to the map, there is a text box "Name of the place" where you can add the name.  Please pay attention to the _language_ indicated here.  It looks like you only add the Italian translation.  In the list of languages, there is an option named "Native for each country" → this is the field to use for the main name.

Your edit here merely says: "This restaurant has no name (no name to be shown on the map)… but here is a translation into Italian = Mangiavino."  This is a bit strange because every time you edit something we’ll have to repair it.

(I agree it’s a shame that Organic Maps does not provide an easy way to avoid this mistake.)

Hope this helps.
Kovoschiz (2023-10-12 14:09:10+00:00): Please don't add `shop=mall` to individual buildings of a mall. This is duplicating.
Kovoschiz (2023-10-12 14:10:11+00:00): 2. Please don't add `wiki*=` to multiple objects. It should be unique.
radiotrefoil (2023-04-18 08:43:37+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits - just FYI way/980459522 is not a standard Mitre 10 DIY store; it's a timber yard. So the edits that iD suggest to clear the "nonstandard tags/non-canon brand" warning would be invalid in this case. Cheers
Patrickov (2023-01-08 09:51:45+00:00): I have preset a tag set when I put in bus route relations or bus related objects, including network=九巴 KMB with network:en=KMB and network:zh=九巴.  If you think I am wrong please go to Discord and publicly denounce me before arbitrarily changing the tags like this.  Thanks.
Patrickov (2023-01-08 09:53:21+00:00): One more thing, I recommend doing map object changes and relation changes in separate change sets unless the former inevitably leads to member change of the latter.
thomassth (2023-01-08 19:59:22+00:00): hey man I meant no harm here

just that OSM editor kept suggesting me to change it like that, leading to think it's what should be done

can we change that "default" in some way?
Patrickov (2023-01-09 02:28:25+00:00): You are right.  I have realized it's recommendation from the editor.  I have raised a discussion on Discord and Kovoschiz and others are finding out how this can be resolved.

Rest assured that I am not to reverse these changes.
abakus_uploader (2023-01-08 23:33:28+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Glassman (2023-01-10 03:00:29+00:00): #TIP: you can square buildings by selection the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131002412
willkmis (2023-01-10 22:26:59+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Did you mean to downgrade the road classification of CA 41 from primary to tertiary in this changeset? If so, what was your rationale? As one of the few main ways into Yosemite Valley, this road seems important enough to be primary, as it is on either side of the portion you changed.
Best,
Will
DM-maps (2023-01-10 23:00:14+00:00): No I did not. My apologies, I'm new to this and would appreciate your help in getting that fixed. I looked at a section of 41 and it appears to be set as a primary road. Can you tell me how to locate the area that needs to be fixed?
DM-maps (2023-01-10 23:05:37+00:00): I did find the link and changed it back to primary. Thank you for letting me know about this, if there are any areas I missed let me know.
willkmis (2023-01-12 01:45:35+00:00): Looks like you figured it out, seems good now!
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (2023-01-08 05:20:35+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Shasta_County,_California
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (2023-01-08 05:30:52+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Shasta_County,_California
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (2023-01-08 05:29:24+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Shasta_County,_California
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (2023-01-08 05:41:03+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Shasta_County,_California
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (2023-01-08 05:48:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Shasta_County,_California
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (2023-01-08 05:51:55+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Shasta_County,_California
mapperue (2023-04-05 07:16:04+00:00): Ahoj, poľná alebo lesná cesta sa značí ako highway=track. Cyklocesta highway=cycleway by to bola ak by tam bola dopravná značka.
Viac informácií tu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway?uselang=sk