piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-04 13:20:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3413790365
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/332739074

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MaciekMma (2023-04-05 10:55:47+00:00): Poprawiłem, dziekuje.
NorthCrab (2023-04-05 10:57:09+00:00): :-) !
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-04 13:20:18+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257524305
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257524087
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257524188

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2023-04-07 14:38:52+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ttT. What is the meaning of the tag
wals = no
?
adrianojbr (2023-04-11 22:40:01+00:00): Olá, AjBelnuovo!

Só para avisar que há um padrão aprovado para o mapeamento de escolas, conforem https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:amenity%3Dschool#Mapeamento_brasileiro.

Abraço!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134496846
AjBelnuovo (2023-04-11 23:07:08+00:00): Só no estado de São Paulo há mais 5000 escolas estaduais e cerca de 40% estão mapeadas no padrão antigo . Quem irá atualizar para o novo padrão ? 
Desde de quando um órgão de governo virou publico ? Isto vale para todas as secretarias de governo?
Foi criado um ref , ref:INEP. Faça uma busca e veja se retorna alguma informação .
adrianojbr (2023-04-11 23:30:52+00:00): As escolas serão atualizadas conforme o resto do mapa é atualizado. Como você é um mapeador bastante ativo achei importante você conhecer o padrão aprovado para ir, pelo menos, adicionando novas escolas já novo padrão.

A diferença entre operador público e governamental não é muito clara no OSM mesmo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator:type. Pessoalmente, eu tenho mapeado escolas com operator:type=government, o que vai ao encontro da sugestão do iD.

Dito isto, qual a diferença para você entre órgão de governo e órgão público?

O OSM tem diversos usos. No site padrão (osm.org), o mecanismo de busca é o Nominatim que ainda não encontra resultados ao buscar por ref:INEP=*. Porém, é possível usar o Overpass para encontrar um código específico ou, por exemplo, encontrar todos os estabelecimentos educacionais (que já tenham o dado, claro) com a consulta https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1tCC.

É interessante ver a proposta da padronização para entender o seu motivo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?oldid=2154117

No mais, alterações no padrão são possíveis, desde que submetidas ao rito adequado.
AjBelnuovo (2023-04-11 23:53:51+00:00): Eu , pelo que vejo , não acredito nestas atualizações . No estado de SP , por exemplo , ainda se encontra escolas com o nome abreviado ou faltando algo no nome .
Pra mim Secretaria é um órgão de governo , e um edifício onde ela está localizada é um edifício público , e mesmo assim , ela não está aberta ao público , já que pra você a adentrar precisará de uma autorização .
Eu já tinha lido a proposta aprovada , e por experiência , não concordo com ela , já que nas pequenas cidades há várias escolas , de níveis diferentes como o mesmo nome .
Hoje , com o Overpass , se você lançar simplesmente INEP- ou CNES- , o que encontra ?
adrianojbr (2023-04-15 22:42:39+00:00): Essa discussão não vai render muitos frutos, pois você já deixou claro que não vai seguir o padrão aprovado.

Inclusive, lembrei que já iniciamos debate sobre isso e não mudou sua opinião: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126794689

Só para deixar uma última reflexão sobre a importância do padrão aprovado é que, entre outras vantagens, há a possibilidade de comparação automática de base de dados com uma etiqueta de código padronizada. Por mim, poderia ter sido do jeito que você faz. Porém, foi aprovada de um modo diferente (para a qual deve ter suas razões também).

Por outro lado, se mantivermos cada um mapeando de um jeito, mesmo conhecendo o padrão, prejudica a utilidade de possíveis ferramentas.

Interessante que a falta de padronização era uma reclamação que você fazia (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48850320) e o formato aprovado é uma solução para esse problema.

Por fim e encerrando definitivamente minha participação em debate com esse assunto, se você quiser sugerir mudanças no padrão, é interessante buscar os meios para fazer isso. O Fórum (https://community.openstreetmap.org/tag/brazil) ou o Telegram (https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Suporte/19853) são caminhos possíveis para perguntar o que precisa ser feito. Eu sou um mero mapeador como você, e tenho mais interesse em mapear onde transito e manter consistente o mapa de SC. No mais, a minha participação é menor.

Abraço!
AjBelnuovo (2023-04-15 23:49:44+00:00): O que está escrito no meus comentários era sobre alteração feita pela a OSM , que desmembrou as escolas e que agora estão voltando ao que era a 6 anos atrás . 
No canal Telegram , que eu já participei , não há discussão e sim imposições e não pessoas que queiram ensinar a mapear , coisa que se acaba aprendendo no dia a dia , com erros e acertos . Quanto as escolas , simplesmente deixarei de mapear e esperar que os que criaram as normas o façam .
literan (2023-04-04 19:08:10+00:00): это не названия
eggie (2023-04-04 14:31:40+00:00): Dag jochhie.. In het begin worden edits van starters gescreend. Uiteraard om te helpen.
Het Isl C. Centrum was toch al genapt op de kaart.
In OSM Nederland zetten we geen adressen op de gebouwen zelf
 We taggen bij op de adresnodes.
Kerken, moskeeën synagogen zijn dan wel een uitzondering omdat het dan als een een religieus gebouw rendert.
Pas je het aan. Of de node of het gebouw. Niet beide. 
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse (2023-04-04 21:22:02+00:00): See block 6951 et al.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-15 12:00:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134937343 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some specific changes in Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7032
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-15 12:00:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134937343 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some specific changes in Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7032
b-unicycling (2023-06-13 11:45:17+00:00): I cannot find that so called wayside cross on the sites & monuments record or on any street-level imagery. Are you sure there is a cross there and that it is an actual historic wayside cross? Could it be a memorial instead?
morray (2023-06-13 15:36:23+00:00): The question is: what is the difference between historic, man_made and memorial tags. If I tagged it historic back then, that was most likely the best Tag that I thought based by on the ground observation. But as pointed out e.g. here https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04752 another tagging might also be appropriate
b-unicycling (2023-06-13 17:22:55+00:00): I can't speak for all the world, but in Ireland, a historic=wayside_cross is one that you would find in the Sites & Monuments Record. Usually a Latin cross, late mediaeval in date, not marking the spot of a death or burial. If it commemorates the War of Independence or 1798 Rising, it's a historic=memorial. If it's for a fatal traffic incident, it's a historic=memorial. If it's on top of a hill, it's a man_made=summit_cross etc.
morray (2023-06-13 18:24:05+00:00): So feel free to improve the tagging.
b-unicycling (2023-06-13 18:32:22+00:00): Difficult, if I can't see it in the available street view imagery.
morray (2023-06-13 18:44:06+00:00): The only way to actually improve it, is going there if you ask me. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth
b-unicycling (2023-06-13 19:15:21+00:00): afraid so
morray (2023-06-13 19:37:30+00:00): Why afraid? Isn't that all pam is about local communities and on the ground truth?
ivanbranco (2023-04-06 11:09:14+00:00): hi VictorIE,

you added place=locality to a residential area, but: "The place=locality tag is used to name an unpopulated location" so it doesn't seems right to me. Could you check it out please?
VictorIE (2023-04-06 16:17:10+00:00): Hi,

I hadn't appreciated that. The reason I used it is that I have to use addr:place for the houses instead of addr:street, as there is no street called Ramleh Villas. I'll need to re-think it.
ivanbranco (2023-04-06 16:21:43+00:00): You could consider place=plot, place=city_block or place=neighbourhood.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dplot
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity_block
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-15 12:00:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134937343 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some specific changes in Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7032
Argbjorn (2023-04-04 20:15:04+00:00): Hi. I have some questions about this changeset.
Why did you delete name:ru tags? And why did you rename "street" to "st", "დიმიტრი" to "დ." etc? It's against the naming rules: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Georgia_Abkhazia_South-Ossetia#Streets

You can join to OSM Georgia Telegram channel (https://t.me/osm_ge) and we'll discuss about that
Shoorick (2023-04-04 20:22:25+00:00): Hello!

Why did you remove name:ru (Russian names)? This activity (Purposeful removal or degradation of data that are known to be correct) is a vandalism — https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
Could you please restore deleted data?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-15 12:00:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134937343 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some specific changes in Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7032
andi9876 (2023-04-05 14:03:58+00:00): Hi.
We taggig in Phnom Penh small streets as foot path. Pedestrian only for wide areas like riverside promenades. Please reverse you edits.
Cheers,
Andi.
andi9876 (2023-04-05 14:09:10+00:00): Service alleys also, please tag as foot path without restriction.
Pegasus21 (2023-04-10 13:26:06+00:00): I have been modifying footway classifications since they are used by motorcycles and tuk tuks but are too small for motor cars to traverse. Footways do not allow vehicle traffic routing in any way. In order to allow motorcycles, bicycles, and tuk tuks the classification needs to be corrected and vehicle restrictions added.
Tilia_J (2023-04-04 15:14:43+00:00): Bijna goed.

Het is abandoned:highway=track

Ook is het netjes om de aanliggende landuses op elkaar aan te laten sluiten, dat heb ik hier gedaan: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=134500901
user_5359 (2023-04-10 17:36:59+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.osm.org/node/2421500880. What is the mean of the tag 
nombre de stade = 5
?
chakib95 (2023-04-11 10:11:22+00:00): 5 football stadiums
joost schouppe (2023-04-20 11:47:08+00:00): You could always add a name:en with the English name. The name is always for the local name (which could be this English name if they use that themselves as their usual name)
Im Fokus (2025-08-23 04:31:34+00:00): Hallo, @redrace, bitte schau Dir doch mal Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4919491 bezüglich eines älteren, aber merkwürdigen Eintrags von Dir zur Freiwilligen Feuerwehr Gennebreck an.
redrace (2025-08-23 07:45:26+00:00): Danke! Hab ich soweit korrigiert!
OSMCowboy (2023-04-04 14:48:18+00:00): Correction: source was MSW 2022-09-30
uprkos (2023-11-21 19:17:29+00:00): Tu chyba drobna pomyłka - Way: 920734188 nie jest asfaltowa, jest tam błoto po kostki :). Pozwalam sobie nieco poprawić tę okolicę po dzisiejszej tam wizycie.
VA00 (2023-11-22 05:44:41+00:00): Solidna i ewidentna pomyłka. Prawdopodobnie zapomniałem zmienić nawierzchni po jeszcze wcześniejszej edycji.
Qwajo OSM (2023-06-20 14:14:45+00:00): Hi mapper, thanks for mapping.Kindly revisit this changeset and see how some mappings are done.
user_5359 (2023-04-04 17:06:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I revert  your change set. Especially because there is no evaluable information about your business.
user_5359 (2023-04-10 17:35:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10784612418. What is the mean of the tag  soort:nl = peppel?
eggie (2023-04-10 19:16:26+00:00): HK   
Welkom terug op OSM.. 
Hier wat leesvoer
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
ter 'Leering ende Vermaeck'

Groet
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-01 13:29:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10784587555/history has shop = haitstyle that was added in this edit
shop=haitstyle ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
Jordi MF (2023-04-04 15:55:14+00:00): Por favor Sig416,
Estás modificando los nombres de institutos de manera vandálica. Estás eliminando información valiosa par que no aparezca el nombre completo de los centros educativos. Deja de editar, comunícate con la comunidad de editores local o deberemos denunciar estas ediciones.
paunofu (2023-04-04 16:09:48+00:00): Hola Sig416, 
En OSM añadiremos preferiblemente la forma sin abreviar si esta es extensamente conocida, como es el caso de los IES y CEIP
streckenkundler (2023-04-07 20:56:10+00:00): Sollte revertet werden, da Vandalismus-Verdacht im Raum steht! Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134398403
Bobbi123 (2023-04-07 21:30:19+00:00): Muss ich entschieden zurückweisen, da die Löschungen gemäß der Kriterien im Wiki für abgebrochene Bahnstrecke geschah bzw. diese für die gelöschten Gleise nicht ausreichen. Begründung dazu siehe auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134398403#map=11/49.5733/9.9859

Ich muss drauf hinweisen, dass mich der User in diesem Chanceset persönlich beleidigt, abgewertet und ad hominem angewendet hat, als die Sachebene verlassen hat. Diese Emotionalität war hier keinesfalls legitim.
Tantri IRM-ED (2023-06-22 02:53:19+00:00): Hallo Irfan_Muriy
Terima kasih sudah berkontribusi menambahkan data di OSM!
Saat ini saya sedang melakukan remote mapping untuk validasi line crossing waterbody yang ada di Indonesia.
Saya membutuhkan bantuanmu terutama untuk waterbody ini (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1159687712)

Saya melihat pada history changeset kamu menambahkan tag reservoir, apakah yang dimaksud adalah tempat penampungan air bersih (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dreservoir_covered) atau kalau tempat pengolahan air bersih mungkin bisa kasih tag ini (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwater_works) dan bisa ditambahkan landuse=industrial.

Saya sangat mengapresiasi apapun informasi yang kamu berikan.
Terimakasih
Irfan_Muriy (2023-06-24 02:48:11+00:00): Halo @tantri
Maaf, baru sempat balas.

Terima kasih, sudah review mapping saya.
yg di lapangan kurang lebih reservoir Pengelolaan Air Bersih Kabupaten. 
Yg di kelola PDAM.
Ada Bak penampungan Yg kapasitas besar, Instalasinya, berikut dgn bangunan2 penunjang. Kurang lebih seperti itu.

Mohon maaf kalau memang saya beri tahu.
Irfan_Muriy (2023-06-24 02:53:36+00:00): Sedikit bertanya, di sini banyak sekali bak2 penampung.
Tapi berbeda ukuran, 
ada yg bak air ukuran 3x3, dan ada juga bak induk ukuran skala besar, yg disalurkan ke beberapa titik.

Apakah di beri tag yg sama semua?

Terima kasih
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2023-07-04 05:19:52+00:00): halo Irfan_Muriy,
saya bantu menjawab ya,
untuk area PDAM dapat di beli tag landuse=industrial.
instalasi pengolahan air minum di dalam area PDAM dalam diberi tag man_made=water_works(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwater_works)
sedangkan bak penampungan airnya dapat diberi tag man_made=reservoir_covered (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dreservoir_covered) dan dapat diberi informasi tambahan capasitas dengan tag capacity=* dengan satuan meter kubik.
hoserab (2023-04-05 23:54:16+00:00): Uhhh... when the hell did that happen? Signs still say "Olympic Way SE"...
MuzikMachine (2023-04-11 03:39:36+00:00): It happened sometime either late-2022 or early-2023, I was directly involved in the project. You can also verify it the City of Calgary Map Gallery - https://mapgallery.calgary.ca/. I used myProperty which also shows some of the associated parcel addresses that use Stampede Trail; https://mapgallery.calgary.ca/apps/d9fcb476b89f41b397f03cd63bb710c4/explore.

Olympic Way SE still remains between 9 & 12 Ave SE.

There were some new signs that went up at 12 Ave SE that show Stampede Trail.
hoserab (2023-04-13 22:24:59+00:00): Okay, fair enough. I asked because I went to a Flames game recently and was pretty sure the signage still said Olympic Way. :D  It was on my mind because I happened to notice there's a sign up a Saddledome Rise which is marked "Saddledome *Way*", which I wondered about. I see the City of Calgary maps still refer to this as Saddledome Rise, not Way, but I presume that was all part of the same project you worked on...?
trailschneck (2024-12-07 09:27:56+00:00): Die Straße heisst Auf der Hubbart. Was heisst hier lt. Gemeinde Schlangenbad? Die Katasterpläne sind da massgeblicher.
eggie (2023-04-04 15:38:48+00:00): Dag Jiyu..
Wanneer een hebouw is gesloopt kun je het verwijderen..
Je kunt ook demolished:building=yes taggen als je bang bent dat iemand het weer intekent.
building=demolished is niet correct.
Groet eggie
JiyuRicardo (2023-04-04 15:41:23+00:00): Het is gebouw is nog niet helemaal gesloopt maar ze zijn er mee bezig, kan ik het dan al weg halen?
eggie (2023-04-04 15:46:59+00:00): Nou dan nog niet..of het moet volgende week tegen de vlakte liggen 😀. maar dan kun je nu wel een note toevoegen..
Bv note=wordt momenteel april 2023 gesloopt... of demolishing in progress oid.
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2023-04-04 15:49:14+00:00): Een vlak landuse=construction over het terrein geeft ook wat duidelijkheid.
Gaat er daarna voorlopig niet gebouwd worden dan landuse=greenfield.
JiyuRicardo (2023-04-04 15:49:28+00:00): Ok, zal ik doen
tsp15 (2023-06-09 18:41:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159691028/ To jest stacja roweru miejskiego (swoją drogą już dodana wcześniej), a nie wiata na rowery.
quecksilberkartograph (2024-01-14 16:48:49+00:00): Hallo erneut,

alle diese Bäume zu kartieren, ist nicht falsch, trotzdem finde ich [natural=tree] bei alleinstehenden oder signifikanten Bäumen, wie der Wiki es sagt, angebrachter.

Wichtig ist auch, sich auf das Wesentliche zu konzentrieren. Bspw. fehlen in Schellbach noch einige Adressen.

Ein gutes Beispiel ist ein Naturdenkmal…
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11473068095

…oder das Projekt „7000 Eichen“ in Kassel.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4629093
marvin3 (2024-01-14 18:34:49+00:00): Ja, es gibt sicherlich wichtigeres.
(Die Hausnummern müsste ich tatsächlich mal machen)
Allerdings finde ich, dass die Bäume auf 3D Karten optisch einen großen Unterschied machen.
Ich orientiere mich viel an dieser Karte:
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=50.9917640&lon=9.4536185&zoom=17
Fizzie-DWG (2023-04-07 01:12:57+00:00): Reverted by DWG pending explanation from user involved: changeset/134596701
DeFra85 (2023-04-09 19:44:31+00:00): Ja und? Durch kommt man trotzdem

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184385188 , der Weg sah beim letzten Mal als ich vor Ort war noch beschissener aus und trotzdem läuft der Hermannsweg offiziell weiterhin drüber
moosfrosch (2023-04-13 06:51:34+00:00): Schranken als "locked" einzutragen sperrt das Routing auch für Fuß und Rad (u.a. via GraphHopper). Auch an anderen Stellen wurde das durch TeutoWald gemacht, von anderen sinnfreien Änderungen ganz abgesehen. Mag Unwissenheit sein, wie man das korrekt taggt. Aber so gehts nicht, und er antwortet weder auf Diskussionen in Änderungssätzen noch auf mehrfaches Anschreiben. Daher Vandalismus + Revertieren.
Jordi MF (2023-04-04 16:09:05+00:00): Estás eliminando etiquetas de idioma correctas y eliminando el nombre completo de centros educativos. Por favor, deja de vandalizar el mapa y ponte en contacto con la comunidad local para saber qué quieres editar.
vasinlo26 (2023-04-04 16:36:23+00:00): https://ibb.co/C0bnc0M
see what are you doing, why don't you leave all nodes alone? you are the one who should correct all nodes to expect GPS location, if you don't, why does you insist at the first place? Can't you see the 3D model already show detail ridges?
vasinlo26 (2023-04-04 16:42:39+00:00): i will not revert at all , but to remove your ridge line at once
GSF1200S (2024-01-24 02:00:02+00:00): Never expect him to reply.
Kovoschiz (2024-01-24 04:58:17+00:00): Have you replied here you annoying hypocrite? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144534922
Kovoschiz (2024-01-24 05:03:07+00:00): Oh, and you should learn about the limitation of SRTM or whatever DEM those maps are using, and the contours or hillshades they generate. Vector breaklines exist independently from raster elevations.
Pioko (2023-04-04 20:08:27+00:00): Odnośnie drogi 1159688494 oraz 1159688501, mieszkam w pobliżu i korzystam z tej drogi od kilku dni, więc wiem że jest już otwarta i przejezdna.
Pozdrawiam
pio2_122 (2023-04-04 20:16:53+00:00): Dziękuję za informację i dokonaną poprawę oznaczenia.
Zbytnio zasugerowałem się dostępnymi w edytorze zdjęciami lotniczymi - mimo, że zostały one wykonane zaledwie trochę ponad rok temu, to jak widać w okolicy zaszło już sporo zmian.
Pozdrawiam.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-04 16:40:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9955623220

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-04 16:50:23+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1159704744

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mannivu (2023-04-04 17:07:10+00:00): Ciao. Questo edit è errato in quanto ha rimosso un tag necessario per il confine amministrativo. Ho ripristinato, ma ti chiederei più attenzione per il futuro. Grazie!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134504595
zorglubu (2023-04-09 09:45:44+00:00): Bonjour,
Ce serait vraiment sympa de commenter vos groupes de modifications en indiquant ce qui est fait, par exemple ici "création station d'épuration".

Comme indiqué ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications#Bons_commentaires
il est peu utile pour les autres membres de la communauté Openstreetmap qui travaillent sur les mêmes zones, d'indiquer "ajout d'information", "modification et correction" ou "création d'objet".
Merci beaucoup d'avance ;-)