piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-12-06 18:26:06+00:00): Hi, currently this road is marked as motor_vehicle=destination which means that it's not accessible to motor vehicles unless they intend to park somewhere there.

I think it was intended for a small part near the school. I'll remove it for the most of the street.
veclunka (2024-12-07 18:47:47+00:00): The problem of routing is just if to route from Jussilepiku N part through small segement of Kase and then to Jussilepiku or vice versus.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=58.646426%2C25.042970%3B58.646683%2C25.042208#map=16/58.64694/25.03870&layers=TD
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-12-07 19:41:51+00:00): The problem which I've fixed would cause that. Wait a bit until routing service updates it's graph.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-12-08 11:34:44+00:00): Looks like it's fixed
veclunka (2024-12-09 09:01:56+00:00): Yes! Thanks!
silversurfer83 (2024-12-06 21:15:28+00:00): Moin

wenn an dem Gebäude noch der Name des Hotels steht könntest du den Namen direkt als "name=*" ohne Zusätze erfassen oder alternativ (vielleicht besser) den Namen in "old_name=*" stecken. Zusätze wie "ehem." nutzen wir eher selten.

Details:     https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

cheers
silversurfer38
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159992569
EnricoMittwoch (2024-12-12 12:45:30+00:00): Hallo,
Kurze Erklärung, ich wollte nicht das Menschen annehmen hier sei weiterhin eine Übernachtungsmöglichkeit vorhanden, habe mit den besten Absichten agiert. 
ich lerne gerne dazu und danke dir für den Input und den Link. Du hast Recht. Die vorgeschlagenen Änderungen werde ich direkt vornehmen.
silversurfer83 (2024-12-23 23:35:46+00:00): Alles klar :)
IvanBabić (2024-12-06 15:21:34+00:00): Reverted because of an unnecessary node made #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159998970
feket (2024-12-06 14:45:13+00:00): Üdv a csapatban, Tsyslucky!
Először arra szeretnélek megkérni, hogy, ha műholdkép alapján rajzolsz valamit, akkor azt a Fömi 2010-2014 réteghez igazítsd! Ebben a szerkesztésedben sok utat is elmozgattál az eredeti helyéről a Bing műholdkép alapján rosszabb helyre.
Épületek rajzolásakor az ID szerkesztőben használhatod a "derékszögesítés" eszközt, hogy szebbek legyenek az alaprajzaid.
Ha kérdésed van, fordulj bátran az OSM magyar közösségéhez: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség

Üdv.: fekete
tsyslucky (2024-12-06 14:55:12+00:00): Szia! Köszönöm az észrevételt, a továbbiakban így fogom csinálni.
mueschel (2024-12-07 11:58:24+00:00): Hi,
I found a variety of "grab_bars" tags:

toilets:grab_bars:left
toilets:grab_bars:right
toilets:grab_bar:right
toilets:grab_bars:rigth
toilets:grab_bar:left
toilets:grab_bars_right

The common and documented tag for this ist "toilets:wheelchair:grab_rails":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Atoilets%3Awheelchair%3Agrab_rails

Could you check & change these?
isi17 (2024-12-11 09:57:53+00:00): Hi,
we must have overlooked this tag before coming up with the grab_bars tag. We wanted to have a transparent tagging system for grab bars including information left, right, foldable and fixed for wheelmap.org. (toilets:grab_bars:left=yes
toilets:grab_bars:left=no
toilets:grab_bars:right=yes
toilets:grab_bars:right=no
toilets:grab_bars:left=fixed
toilets:grab_bars:right=foldable). Do you think we should change "grab bars" to "grab rails"?
mueschel (2024-12-11 10:49:08+00:00): The best way is to support the already existing tag "toilets:wheelchair:grab_rails".
Joske1020 (2026-02-10 19:10:57+00:00): Je hebt waarschijnlijk gelijk, maar er is wel een probleempje dat in mij opkomt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10071814 is nu niet meer geldig. Ben je zeker dat het pad niet overgroeid is?
Koen VO (2026-02-10 19:22:12+00:00): Hey, je hebt ook gelijk, de tour de Fagne d'Odeigne loopt nier meer rond in een lus op die manier. Maar de toer is effectief gewijzigd. Kan jij het aanpassen?
Joske1020 (2026-02-10 23:21:52+00:00): ja, zal ik doen. Misschien door het natte milieu dat het oude pad niet meer begaanbaar was?
steko (2024-12-12 09:03:38+00:00): this change does not reflect the current situation as updated in changeset #159946528
eggie (2024-12-06 14:59:53+00:00): Dag YouKnow.. Maak altijd een verbinding met kruisende wegen.
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
  	2

MVG
eggie
5m4u9 (2024-12-06 15:26:00+00:00): Creo que poner landuse=education a las escuelas que solo tienen reportado 1 escuela, es algo extremo. En el centro quizá haya 2 escuelas en un mismo lugar, pero en áreas más rurales suelen ser solo una.


A mi parecer debería quedar como school hasta que se reporte una posible otra escuela.
JJIglesias (2024-12-14 06:56:16+00:00): Hay que considerar q muchas escuelitas, tienen también centros de educación de adultos asociados, lo que básicamente es otra escuela también
Nielkrokodil (2025-02-08 08:55:31+00:00): An deinen Änderungssatz grenzt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81735008 Kennst du das dort und kannst mir vielleicht weiterhelfen?

Dieser Weg hat ein oneway=yes auf einem highway=footway. Das ist ungewöhnlich, weil das bedeutet, da dürfen Fußgänger nur in eine Richtung gehen. Stimmt das? Falls nein, wie sieht es dort aus?
Alexander da Costa Amaral (2025-02-10 07:32:46+00:00): Danke für die Information! Ja, ich arbeite im Bereich Technik am Klinikum und kenne diese Stelle. Es ist natürlich kein Einbahnsystem!!! Das habe ich gerade korrigiert.  Danke noch einmal für das Wachsame Auge! Liebe Grüße
eggie (2024-12-06 14:55:54+00:00): Dag YouKnow.. Het is een voetpad dus het zal niet routeren voor fietsers.
Ik heb een slingerhekje toegevoegd met bicycle=no
Paar keer ctrl f5 voor het effect. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-12-06 14:49:54+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway

Fixed.
Groet
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-18 10:09:33+00:00): can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4811306 ?
joost schouppe (2024-12-10 10:48:33+00:00): Hoi Jurgen,
Het was hier niet nodig het gebouw te splitsen. In dit geval kan je gewoon het adres van het gebouw afhalen en twee adressen als punt aanmaken. Ik pas het zo aan.
rene78 (2024-12-09 23:18:45+00:00): 👍
5m4u9 (2024-12-06 15:31:12+00:00): Hola, qué genial que vayas reportando con "streetcomplete" lo que está mapeado, a veces pienso que muchos negocios están desactualizados, pero parece que no. Gracias!
SpinOff (2024-12-22 00:07:05+00:00): Hej. Granicę tego przysiółka rysowałeś na oko, czy ona faktycznie istnieje w jakiś dokumentach? Pytam, bo wtedy trzeba by ją odpowiednio otagować.
barteqk1 (2024-12-24 00:41:41+00:00): szczerze na oko i to jest lokalna nazwa tej czesci wsi, wszystkie domostwa pownny sie zgadzac
literan (2024-12-07 10:04:15+00:00): неверная правка. Здесь эти теги означают доступность парома для пешеходов/велосипедистов. Читайте вики https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aroute%3Dferry

откачу
Joseph R P (2024-12-08 21:17:41+00:00): Hello, please do not reclassify properly-tagged roads on OSM so that they could be routed along in a third party app. Parking aisle and driveway tags were all used accordingly here.
joost schouppe (2024-12-06 15:33:05+00:00): Sorry about the huge changeset, I most have forgotten I had that woodlands in Bolivia still open
silversurfer83 (2024-12-06 21:53:21+00:00): Hi again

please read and understand
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Also I would like to know why you would remove the "alley" tags and why you would delete highway areas?

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159996700
silversurfer83 (2024-12-08 08:24:31+00:00): Since you're very rarely active I took the liberty to revert these "fixes". Feel free to explain why these features should be deleted when you log on again. Please offer better comments and explanations for edits like these. Thank you.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160048531
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 01:23:11+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164657277
ervinjoshuadelrosario (2024-12-06 14:43:10+00:00): Correction: Modified and changed reference numbers of lattice towers and steel poles of Sucat-Paco-Araneta section of Sucat-Paco-Araneta-Balintawak Transmission Line due to some of its portions were relocated to give way for the construction of Skyway Stage 3.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-08 03:43:17+00:00): Dupes
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159997297
AlvaroRC (2024-12-11 20:10:42+00:00): Las ciclovías de este conjunto de cambios no existen. Las he eliminado manualmente (se solapaban con otros cambios más recientes). No es necesario revertir.
ElliottPlack (2024-12-06 14:54:00+00:00): Hi there, looks like you are adding horse trails so they show up on Waymarked Trails or similar apps. Adding all of the trails in a park as a single route is not supported. Routes are designed to be from point A to point B. If you want to make these sorts of edits, you'll want to create individual routes for each path.

--
Elliott Plack  
OSM Foundation  
Data Working Group
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159997491
mavl (2024-12-06 15:27:26+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет тег addr:street=Р-402. Это не совсем правильно, так как Р-402 это не название улицы, а номер трассы. Теги addr:street и addr:place не указывают вместе.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr:place
UrbanPlanner69 (2024-12-06 15:33:22+00:00): Добрый день! Исправлено, тег addr:place удален
mavl (2024-12-06 15:39:59+00:00): Вряд ли это правильно, так как улицы с таким названием там нет.  
Напрашивается:  
addr:place=57 км автодороги «Тюмень-Омск»  
  
Это информация с местности и она указана в теге addr:full.
UrbanPlanner69 (2024-12-06 15:47:55+00:00): Скажите пожалуйста, в новых подобных случаях стоит заполнять теги addr:full и addr:place или одного addr:full будет достаточно?
mavl (2024-12-06 15:58:53+00:00): addr:full используется для адресов, которые плохо укладываются в почтовую схему. Например, "Пятый дом у озера Щучье".  
  
addr:place используется для адресных элементов, которые не являются улицами, но их заменяют. Например, "территория Депо".   
  
Пожалуй, для адресов на трассах лучше подходит addr:place= Такой-то километр такого-то шоссе. Например, в Тюменской области так и написано на табличках на заправках и кафе. В других областях может быть по-другому.
habi (2024-12-07 13:36:53+00:00): Ciao Rollo
Questions like these are best *not* added as text in a node on OpenStreetMap, but probably as an OSM Note [1].
It should especially *not* be added into the `name`-Tag as you have done here.

The way you have added the (falsely named) node to is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570452713, and depending on the router, a `highway=track` (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack) is used for routing.

In Italy, the assumed standard is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Italy
Here, it seems to me that `access=forestry` should be added to the way, hence prohibiting access to the general public, "unless you're a wood worker" (as you've written).

I did change this accordingly in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160027187, if this is not what you've wanted to achieve, please get back to me!

Happy mapping, greetings from Switzerland
Habi



[1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Note
habi (2024-12-07 13:37:10+00:00): (sorry, Typo in *your* name)
mavl (2024-12-06 15:13:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 159957975, 159958544, 159958706, 159958735, 159958777, 159958817, 159958835, 159988551, 159988968, 159989109, 159989870, 159990175, 159990248, 159990319, 159990362, 159990787, 159990874, 159990961, 159991247, 159991346.
Tim Grose (2025-02-05 14:35:07+00:00): Hi. Is this "road" really called "The Bumpy Road" perhaps by some sign on the ground or maybe more of a description of the nature of it which IMHO is not the purpose of the "Name" field. Thanks Tim
Tim Grose (2025-02-06 09:56:21+00:00): PS found https://themovemarket.com/tools/propertyprices/mowlands-farm-frith-end-bordon-gu35-0qr which refers to houses along said road. The postal addresses just seem to refer to the locality of Frith End and not an actual road. Also checked historic OS maps and no road names mentioned.
sheldonelectric (2024-12-28 03:00:02+00:00): Hey there, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10087844420 I see you corrected the previous mistake but it's still wrong : if there is no meat anywhere on the menu, the correct tagging is vegetarian=only. If you put yes it means there's meat and vegetarian options available.
taxi301 (2024-12-09 20:14:26+00:00): linia 125088938 to nie jest droga  jednokierunkowa , to dojazd i wyjazd z parkingu
literan (2024-12-07 09:55:09+00:00): вижу, что так написано в вики, как один из вариантов, но мне прям режет глаз. Получается, вместо одного крана тут целых три (три объекта с man_made=crane)
Francesco Zanaboni (2024-12-06 16:05:13+00:00): nice changeset id :)
gscholz (2024-12-06 16:13:07+00:00): Yes indeed!
shu0410 (2024-12-06 17:09:50+00:00): congrat
kechan (2024-12-06 17:29:34+00:00): impressive
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2024-12-07 10:30:50+00:00): Congrats for changeset #160000000!
HugoC01 (2025-04-06 09:12:13+00:00): nice
HugoC01 (2025-04-06 09:14:21+00:00): Pas loin de 160000000
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-17 09:01:36+00:00): This changeset connected overpass to motorway
reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162602149
fb552 (2024-12-07 13:22:42+00:00): Purtroppo ho sbagliato mettendo il tag etcs=yes invece di etcs=2.
Scusatemi, cerco di rimediare il più presto possibile.
SomeoneElse (2024-12-09 10:27:22+00:00): Hello on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/724756959/history you've moved the surface tag.  Would "surface=mud", "surface=sand", or even "surface=mud;sand" work here?
Best Regards,
Andy
Simon Hobeck (2024-12-09 10:34:57+00:00): Thanks for asking -I was trying to remove mixed values so either "dirt" or "sand" could work.  I was told its often better to clear ambiguous values so other could complete.
Do multiple values work?  I was trying to follow the guidance for surface area and it wasn't clear if multiple values can be used (I guess different apps present the data differently)
SomeoneElse (2024-12-09 12:18:15+00:00): If the surface here is "mostly mud" then I'd probably have gone with "surface=mud" (and "sand" for "mostly sand" nearby).
If mutiple values are needed, then senicolons are usually used as separators.
Data consumers have the choice whether to use the whole value or just the part up to the semicolon.
You can see which tag values are used by which projects by looking at the "projects" tag at taginfo.osm.org.
The maps I produce show tidal and non-tidal mud and sand as different patterns, and because "tidalflat" is a bit vague, use the surface value.
Generally speaking, if a rarely-used value can be obviously replaced with another value that means exactly the same thing it makes sense to do so, but it doesn't really make sense to remove a rare value altogether.
Presumably you've had a look at different sets of imagery here and already have an idea that "yes, that's more like mud than sand" (or vice versa) so should be in a position to decide which - or if it is not clear, "surface=mud;sand".
Simon Hobeck (2024-12-09 12:30:09+00:00): Thanks, that is useful - I wasn't aware of taginfo.osm.org.

I'm happy to change the values for this area and now feel it may be best just to retain the previous value (I assume if there is a mix, then put the primary item first so the various apps can take that as the single value if they want and its mostly correct).
SomeoneElse (2024-12-09 13:28:56+00:00): The previous value was a bit odd (comma rather than a semicolon) and so needed changing to something.
What is the actual correct value probably depends on survey  local knowledge or really good photos.
If it was me and it looks like "mostly mud" then I'd use "mud" for the surface value; I'd only use a semicolon-separated value if it really was a mix of the two.
Friendly_Ghost (2025-01-04 19:21:52+00:00): Hi there. Thanks for helping out with mapping this area. Could you please not attach street-side parking to the streets? Because that would imply that the parking areas go exactly to the centre lines of the streets, which is usually not the case.

Greetz,
Casper
Ommageden (2025-01-01 01:07:43+00:00): Looks good, good job 👍
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 02:26:20+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165051497
wildmaps (2024-12-07 15:27:35+00:00): Accidentally included an unrelated edit in America, causing the changeset to cover a large area. The main focus of this changeset remains the intended edits in Villabassa. Apologies for the mistake.
mavl (2024-12-07 05:10:39+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы снова добавляете несуществующие названия вокзалов. Ваши изменения будут отменены.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
Jakka (2024-12-06 18:54:49+00:00): il y a une "building" sur image aérienne en picc layer rien a voir ?
Alvaro747 (2024-12-13 12:01:19+00:00): Es la segunda vez que añades el llamado "Trencentro". No existe. Es posible que te estés confundiendo con la línea de metro que YA ESTA AÑADIDA. Te ruego que dejes que añadir la citada línea, ya que no se corresponde con nanda que en la actualidad exista en Sevilla. Dicha línea no existe ni como metro, ni como tranvía, ni como proyecto de ninguno de estos transportes. Además, insistes en añadir unos depósitos de tranvía que NO EXISTEN. De nuevo ruego , y ya por última vez, que hagas un uso responsable de la aplicación. Un saludo.
Hypsometric (2025-05-08 11:34:49+00:00): Hello, I just wanted to let you know that this information is public. Private information should not be published on OpenStreetMap. I suggest creating your own waypoints in an app like OsmAnd.
Hypsometric (2025-05-08 11:38:48+00:00): I have removed the nodes.
mavl (2024-12-07 05:14:00+00:00): Здраствуйте. Вокзал в Заводоуковске не называется "Заводоуковская". У него нет названия.
south ural (2024-12-07 05:56:53+00:00): Здравствуйте! Есть, оно указано со стороны перрона. именно «ЗАВОДОУКОВСКАЯ» Официальное название вокзал: железнодорожный вокзал станции Заводоуковская. Все вопросы в упавление Свердловской ЖД.
mavl (2024-12-07 06:09:27+00:00): "Заводоуковская" - это не название железнодорожной станции, а не название вокзала. Железнодорожная станция обозначена и имеет название. Для официальных названий имеется специальный тег.
mavl (2024-12-07 06:10:19+00:00): Неправильно выше было написано:  ""Заводоуковская" - это название железнодорожной станции".
south ural (2024-12-07 10:34:58+00:00): Вы критически не правы!  Это не только название станции, но и название железнодорожного вокзала станции Заводоуковская. Верните наименование на место. Правила давно пора менять, они затоялись.
RusticCloud3325 (2024-12-13 06:01:34+00:00): Have you checked this? https://binamarga.pu.go.id/balai-jateng-diy/konten/publikasi/peta-ruas-jalan-nasional

That is the official map from the Ministry of Transportation. That map indicates that this section is "Jalan Nasional" hence it should be a trunk road as far as I'm concerned.
RusticCloud3325 (2024-12-13 06:03:56+00:00): May I inquire as for your sources to tag this road as primary road?
LakePeipus (2024-12-17 13:49:28+00:00): Hello RusticCloud3325, I recognize the source used to justify the highway modifications and will defer to your edits. I am curious about the trunk roads arbitrarily stopping at the border of Yogyakarta City (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12397379391, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12397379389, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3803284377), and wonder if there is a way to extend the trunk classification. Let me know your thoughts on that.
RusticCloud3325 (2025-02-17 04:22:53+00:00): On second thought, I think your edit is okay, because even though it is a "jalan nasional", it does not function as a trunk road (connecting cities), but rather as a road for entering/exiting a city. I'm okay with this road being a primary road.
LakePeipus (2025-02-18 22:46:22+00:00): Thank you! I appreciate you taking the time to look into this.
AwFi (2024-12-07 11:29:40+00:00): Ciao,

ho visto che hai aggiunto ETCS sulla direttissima come "yes", vorrei solo consigliarti di controllare la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway:etcs). 
A differenza di SCMT e SSC il tag vorrebbe un numero (la versione) invece che "yes" o "no".

Buon mapping!
AwFi
fb552 (2024-12-07 13:20:38+00:00): Ciao AwFi,
non su questo changeset ma si ho aggiornato la direttissima con l'ETCS.
Purtroppo mi sono reso conto del mio errore solo all'ultimo quando avevo già modificato tutto. Ero abituato infatti al SCMT e SSC e non ho pensato a leggere la wiki dell'ETCS prima.
Cerco di rimediare il prima possibile.
Grazie,
Francesco
AwFi (2024-12-10 10:47:00+00:00): Ciao, si hai ragione, ho completamente sbagliato changeset. 
Con una query overpass e poi josm è molto veloce correggere.

Buona gioranta.
AwFi
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-12-07 11:07:26+00:00): Please use correct tagging when mapping buildings, pools and other features. Read the official openstreetmap wiki please. Thanks!
goodidea (2024-12-11 14:49:54+00:00): Hallo!

Du hast am Kieselhumes eine Lärmschutzwand in Bau eingezeichnet – sehr gut!

Aber darf ich fragen, warum du die Tags barrier=construction + construction=wall verwendet hast? bietet der ID-Editor das an?

barrier=construction ist nämlich kein im Wiki dokumentierter Wert. Habe ich vorher auch noch nie gesehen.

Warum nicht mit einem Lifecycle Präfix (construction:barrier=wall + construction:wall=noise_barrier)? So würde ich es taggen ... Ist eigentlich das empfohlene (und auch dokumentierte) Tagging in so einem Fall.

Auch diesen Knoten mit den Tags barrier=construction + construction=gate würde ich mit Lifecycle Präfix taggen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12400700893.

Wäre vielleicht sinnvoll, das zu ändern...

Viele Grüße!
kkopper (2024-12-13 17:16:17+00:00): Hallo,

erstmal vielen Dank für das Feedback.

Ich habe gerade nochmal im Wiki nachgeschaut, wie ich auf diese Idee gekommen war: Im deutschen Wiki ist das empfohlene Tagging mittels Lifecycle Präfix direkt am Anfang erwähnt, im englischen Wiki hingegen allerdings erst ganz am Ende des Artikels (jeweils für Key:construction). Da ich die englische Seite genutzt hatte, muss ich das wohl übersehen haben und mich am Vorgehen für bspw. Straßen orientiert haben.

Da das offensichtlich falsch ist, werde ich das gleich verbessern,

Nochmals besten Dank und viele Grüße.
goodidea (2024-12-14 02:42:20+00:00): Hallo! Danke für die Änderungen! Es ist mir auch nur aufgefallen, weil das bei mir im Editor (in dem Fall Vespucci) als barrier mit unbekanntem Wert angezeigt wurde ..

Und ja, ich weiß – es ist etwas speziell mit "construction" ... Hat wie vieles bei OSM wohl „entwicklungsgeschichtliche“ Gründe (dass es building=construction gibt oder highway=construction etc., aber barrier=construction unüblich ist). Die Lifecycle Präfixe gab es halt erst später – dafür halt für alles ... aber die werden von vielen Editoren oder Karten ja auch nicht immer toll unterstützt (ich habe mir dafür  z.B. extra Custom Presets und Custom DataStyling gebastelt für Vespucci + JOSM).

Und im Wiki wird so einiges auf den ersten Blick nicht ganz klar, oft auch auf deutsch/englisch mit abweichenden Erklärungen usw. Da muss man sich dann etwas durchkämpfen ...

Viele Grüße
NorthCrab_upload (2024-12-06 17:41:01+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2560872302
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168397950

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
4004 (2024-12-06 17:38:51+00:00): https://pravo.by/document/?guid=12551&p0=D924r0135699
Dindia (2025-04-21 18:27:20+00:00): It's duplication of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10005504317