piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jordi MF (2024-11-10 11:23:09+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158963367
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-11 12:24:14+00:00): Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4694985 ?
daroKPPSP (2024-11-17 11:55:32+00:00): Poprawa zarysu budynku nie jest zgodna z pomiarami geodezji, więc proszę podać przyczynę zmiany obrysu.
Jrachi (2024-11-11 07:40:46+00:00): Ciao.
Non mi sembra corretto usare la numerazione dei percorsi come se fossero il nome vero e proprio.
Trovo anche anomalo l'assegnazione di un codice di un percorso principale ad una sua variante di avvicinamento.
Mi riferisco al 
name=Raccordo percorso CAI 003
ref=003

Ivo
Giulio Schweizer (2024-11-11 08:23:11+00:00): Ciao Ivo, io sono referente OSM2CAI e catasto REI-Infomot per la sezione CAI di Bologna. Tu chi sei?

Il mio ruolo è quello di tenere aggiornati i percorsi CAI su OSM, un lavoro molto difficile perché le varianti che vengono fatte sul territorio molto spesso non mi vengono neanche comunicate. Facendo ricognizione sul campo, un po' alla volta ne vengo a conoscenza e cerco in qualche modo di risolvere alcune incongruità, come nel caso del collegamento 003. In questo caso specifico ho trovato sul campo un cartello CAI che riporta la scritta 003, ma in verità quello è solo un collegamento al percorso vero e proprio. Che fare? Sono consapevole che la soluzione da me adottata non è la più corretta, ma in attesa di poter discutere con la sottosezione di Castiglione dei Popoli che si occupa della manutenzione dei sentieri in quella zona, mi sono preso la licenza di adottare una soluzione che io stesso considero provvisoria.

Per quanto concerne la denominazione del percorso, ne ho già lungamente discusso con Andrea del Sarto, referente catasto REI nazionale. Su questo punto abbiamo idee divergenti, nessuna delle quali è scolpita nella Bibbia, pertanto sono entrambe legittime, tantopiù che le regole definite dal CAI non hanno in alcun modo il diritto di imporsi agli utenti di OSM, che è una piattaforma libera e indipendente dal CAI (per fortuna!).

Grazie del tuo interessamento sul faticoso lavoro che sto svolgendo in totale solitudine, dato che in tutta la sezione di Bologna, che consta di 3200 iscritti, non siamo riusciti a trovare nessun altro volontario che abbia voglia di aiutarmi.

Cordialmente 
Giulio Schweizer
Jrachi (2024-11-11 10:20:27+00:00): Ciao.
Grazie della veloce risposta.
Sono referente nazionale sulla piattaforma OSM2CAI, rilevatore della rete escursionistica del Piemonte, ex UNMapper, socio della sezione CAI di Lanzo Torinese.
Sono pienamente d'accordo con te le regole "imposte" dal CAI vanno prese con le dovute cautele.
Purtroppo sulla chiave name ci sono molte discordanze e idee diverse, per cui mi limito a segnalare le "stranezze" sperando di trovare un giorno o l'altro una metodica comune.
Capisco la tua acredine sulla difficoltà a trovare chi si occupa di aggiornare la mappa. È un lavoro difficile e che richiede delle conoscenze non comuni per utilizzare gli editor e capire la taggatura più corretta.

Personalmente sto mettendo a punto uno script che mi segnala tutte le modifiche sulle route hiking in Italia (relazioni nuove, cambiate e cancellate), e quando posso controllo su Josm chi e cosa ha fatto.
Ti segnalo che abbiamo creato un gruppo su Telegram specificatamente per la mappatura di percorsi e sentieri:
OpenStreetMap - Italia OutDoor
Sarei felici di aiutarti com posso!

Ivo
宝山30r_official (2024-11-10 11:37:20+00:00): 可否看一下我发给您的站内信息？
blblfdl (2024-11-10 12:16:17+00:00): 好的
eggie (2024-11-10 11:42:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   De toegang stond op permissive. Dus particulier gebied, maar toegang wordt gedoogd. Het vervolg van de paden staat ook op pemissive, Waarom juist dit stuk afsluiten voor bv wandelaars ?
Er lopen hier ook twee wandelroutes.

MVG
eggie

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NeisBot (2024-11-10 15:22:26+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and changesets, particularly those concerning the names you've added or modified.

It seems that some of these names are a bit unusual.

#NameCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-11-15 06:37:49+00:00): No Response, reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159156487
Dawid2849 (2024-11-10 12:01:10+00:00): junction mogło zostać, ale zamiast roundabout powinno być circular
PZP3610 (2024-11-10 13:36:36+00:00): Wiki mówi, że nawet junction=roundabout tutaj pasuje.

"A roundabout is a one-way street with right-of-way and a non-traversable centre island. There can be traffic light, as long as the circular road has right-of-way when the lights are off."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Signal-controlled_roundabouts

(Chociaż trudno powiedzieć czy ktoś się do tej zasady stosuje, bo przykład podany w tej sekcji został przetagowany na junction=circular...)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-07 02:42:02+00:00): aj, to może do wycofania
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-07 02:47:41+00:00): o, widzę że jeszcze zmiany w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159095032


"There can be traffic light, as long as the circular road has right-of-way when the lights are off" - a co jak światła tylko przy awarii wyłączają?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#What_about_case_which_is_permanently_controlled_by_traffic_signals - może powinienem się na forum zapytać
Yunkers (2024-12-07 10:42:28+00:00): Ja bym mimo wszystko dał circular. Tamte informacje dotyczą rond w Anglii jednak te polskie działają inaczej. W praktyce na takim skrzyżowaniu nie zachowujesz się jak na zwykłym skrzyżowaniu, a nie jak na rondzie.
Tatfahren (2024-11-10 13:50:08+00:00): Hello lyctkel,
maybe it would be better if you write "revert my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157590640 which changed glass colour to a wrong value".

If you do this you wouldn´t need a source tag for this changset on the container node. 

Or you use "source:recycling:glass_bottles:colour=changeset 118956140".

If you use the source tag like you do now, everyone that want to change something at the container first have to look what this changeset was about, so he isn´t adding worse information, because someone added it from a better source in this changeset.
lyctkel (2024-11-10 17:12:22+00:00): Moin Tatfahren,
so habe ich es noch nicht gesehen. Danke für den Hinweis.
"source:recycling:glass_bottles:colour=changeset 118956140" 
kling wie eine gute Lösung.
Viele Grüße aus den Niederlanden,
lyctkel
rempshaener (2024-11-10 14:22:41+00:00): Hallo,
du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Eine kurze Erläuterung zu Brücken; es gibt zwei getrennte Objekte:
-	Highway=*, an denen die Brückeneigenschaft mit bridge=yes ergänzt wird
-	Brückenkörper man_made=bridge
Die entsprechenden highway=Stücke sind bereits alle gesperrt. Diese sind maßgeblich für das Routing, die meisten Kartendarstellungen usw.
Deine Änderung bezieht sich auf den Brückenkörper – das hat aber keinerlei Auswirkungen.
Bei Fragen: jederzeit gerne!
Viele Grüße
silversurfer83 (2024-11-10 13:53:24+00:00): Moin,

in einem Einkaufszentrum hinterlassen Läden idR eine weiternutzbare Fläche. Daher halte ich bei Umzügen/Schließungen die Nutzung von Lebenszyklus Präfixen für angebracht um den leeren Laden später mit dem neuen Mieter zu befüllen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Außerdem:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158964643
Andrea Musuruane (2024-11-11 09:10:29+00:00): Ciao. Questa relazione deve essere cancellata perché non segue le regole di OSM: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories Ciao, Andrea
jbramley (2025-01-19 10:31:18+00:00): I agree that the A11 crossing is dire, but the definitive RoW map shows Cherry Hill as a normal highway: https://www.suffolk.gov.uk/asset-library/imported/Barton-Mills.pdf
corgicity (2025-01-20 08:26:15+00:00): I surveyed the route south of the A11 in person a few months ago. From memory the southern 2/3 of it is a farm track.  The last 1/3 ran along a field up to A11 where there was evidence of a place where pedestrians could cross (as you say ...  dangerously).  I think the old road may have grown over (would have to check).
jbramley (2025-01-20 09:10:06+00:00): I agree on the state of it! I went through there on a bicycle in the summer (S->N). I recall it being signposted as a footpath from the northern end so I'm intending to head back out there at some point before checking with the council.

I'm not sure of the best way to record this in OSM, though.

- "designation: unclassified_highway" makes sense; it's not a documented tag as far as I can see, but none of the others fit.

- "highway: footway" makes sense as a physical description of (most of) the track. Perhaps the southern section should be "highway: track".

I'd like to add "bicycle: yes" to both parts, but perhaps with a suitable surface quality tag, and a break as it crosses the A11. Is that reasonable? There's often a tension between what's legally allowed and what's actually a good idea.

For what it's worth, I noticed this only because cycle.travel's rendering shows it as a (rough) cyclable track, but OSM doesn't. I thought you'd changed it, but it appears not.
corgicity (2025-01-20 09:17:45+00:00): Yes that sounds reasonable.  Thanks for spotting this.
eggie (2024-11-11 19:37:29+00:00): Hoi,

In deze router werkt het al.
De anderen zullen spoedig volgen. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=52.664154%2C4.853575%3B52.663494%2C4.852771#map=17/52.663653/4.856858
gentiw (2024-11-11 19:57:13+00:00): Super! This is almost correct now. I split the previous road as well as the access is open and can make a faster route (No longer in construction). I'll take some time later this week to review everything in this square and submit the changes.
eggie (2024-11-11 20:04:55+00:00): 👍
Jordi MF (2024-11-10 13:20:06+00:00): Se han revertido todos los changesets de este usuario porque es un usuario bloqueado decenas de veces con cuentas múltiples (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/), por lo que sistemáticamente incumple los Términos de Uso de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_account#Account_Names_and_Multi_Account_Policies y https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#VI._Account_cancellation_or_suspension).
El usuario realiza múltiples y pequeñas ediciones para dificultar que sus cambios puedan ser revisados. Los mayores errores son que modifica la toponimia oficial para que no aparezca en valenciano aunque así lo dictamine la Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua en la cartografía oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana. Tenemos permiso explícito de esta entidad que, según las leyes autonómicas, es la entidad encargada de la toponimia oficial. Tampoco no tiene en cuenta la cartelería local que aparece en calles, carreteras y sendas.
Por otra parte, este usuario (y todas sus cuentas) está mapeando según las ortofotos y sin tener en cuenta el conocimiento local para delimitar si los elementos se tratan de edificios en ruinas, muros u otros elementos e, incluso, elimina PDIs con todo el historial de forma injustificada.
Ante todo lo expuesto y por las diversas anomalías, revierto todos los changesets porque, de revisar cada uno de ellos, únicamente nos dedicaríamos a ello, como si fuésemos administradores. En caso de revisar todas las ediciones de este usuario que ya ha sido bloqueado por 10 años con otras cuentas, nunca podríamos seguir mejorando la base de datos debido a revisar durante horas cada uno de los conjuntos de cambios y, por lo tanto, dejaríamos de lado seguir mapeando para añadir nueva información.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158967231
jcarlson (2025-05-21 15:01:58+00:00): Really late to the game here, but this looks like the I&M canal to me?
felipeeugenio (2024-11-10 12:33:35+00:00): Id	Contributor	Tmstmp UTC	Action	Comment
4512420	felipeeugenio	2024-11-10 13:32	closed	ok
4512419	felipeeugenio	2024-11-10 13:32	closed	ok
4512424	felipeeugenio	2024-11-10 13:32	closed	ok
4512423	felipeeugenio	2024-11-10 13:30	closed	ok
4512422	felipeeugenio	2024-11-10 13:30	closed	ok
4512418	felipeeugenio	2024-11-10 13:30	closed	ok
4512417	felipeeugenio	2024-11-10 13:30	closed	ok
4512416	felipeeugenio	2024-11-10 13:29	closed	ok
4512415	felipeeugenio	2024-11-10 13:28	closed	ok
4512414	felipeeugenio	2024-11-10 13:28	closed	ok
Marek-M (2024-12-23 18:29:55+00:00): Odnoszę wrażenie, że ta edycja maro21 miała sens. W końcu są to drogi dla komunikacji publicznej i mapowanie ich jako busway powoduje, że nie trzeba dodawać accessów
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=busway
Implies
access=no
bus=designated
emergency=yes

Tagi bardziej powszechne nie zawsze są poprawne w każdej sytuacji.
Marek-M (2024-12-23 20:11:13+00:00): Rozumiem chyba - brak renderu na osm_carto jest tutaj dużym problemem. Ciekawe, czy mają w planach wprowadzenie renderu dla busway.
pavvv (2024-12-23 22:19:24+00:00): Około miesiąc temu Niewnen pokasował wszystkie highway=busway z Polski. W Polsce nie używa się tego tagu, więc najpierw powinno się zrobić dyskusję na temat zaczęcia jego użytkowania.
Najbardziej problematyczne w edycji maro21 było to, że w reszcie Wrocławia, a nawet Polski, wszędzie używane jest highway=service+ access=no + bus=designated, więc przez to w jednym mieście istniały dwa sposoby tagowania tej samej rzeczy.
rempshaener (2024-11-10 14:24:42+00:00): Super, danke dir
flohoff (2024-11-10 17:10:19+00:00): Moin,
ich habe hier den changeset gesehen. Die Gebäude sind alle so ein bisschen "Windschief" - Es gib in allen editoren eine funktion mit der du automatisch fächen Rechtwinkelig mahcen kannst.

Dazu solltest du anstatt das Luftbild zu nehmen mal ins ALKIS gucken - Das ist das Liegenschaftskataster - da sind die Gebäude oft deutlich besser und lagegenauer (Auf <5cm) eingetragen.

Wenn du viel mehr mit Gebäuden machen willst würde ich dir empfehlen auf JOSM als editor zu wechseln - da gibts die möglichkeit Gebäude aus dem ALKIS Automatisiert zu übernehmen.

Flo
NorthCrab_upload (2024-11-10 13:21:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12328596449

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
martianfreeloader (2024-11-29 21:12:13+00:00): Hi,
You forgot to set the construction=tertiary tag. This led to the next mappers setting the road type incorrectly after the road had reopened. They set it to highway=residential, whereas highway=tertriary would have been correct.

Please set the construction=* key when you tag a road as under construction. You can find documentation on how to do this here:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:highway=construction?uselang=en

Happy mapping!
mcliquid (2024-11-10 17:49:46+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag,

bitte beachte jedoch: Changesets sollten lokal sein.

In deinem Fall bitte vor dem Ortswechsel immer alle Änderungen in OsmAnd hochladen!

Um Konflikte zu vermeiden und aus Höflichkeit gegenüber anderen wird empfohlen:
• Änderungen in einem kleinen geografischen Bereich zu kombinieren (innerhalb einer Stadt, eines Bezirks oder einer Provinz)
• Änderungen innerhalb desselben Landes zu halten
• Änderungen hochzuladen/speichern, bevor man in einem anderen Gebiet weiterkartiert

Warum? Schau dir den Abschnitt "Geographische Größe von Changesets" auf dieser Wiki-Seite an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Danke für die Berücksichtigung, einen schönen Tag noch und fröhliches Mappen!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-31 12:26:55+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12328590378/history has shop = restaurant that was added in this edit
shop=restaurant ? Is it a mistagged restaurant? Maybe it should be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drestaurant ? Is it a place selling restaurant equipment (in such case shop=trade trade=restaurant_equipment would be likely better and more clear) ? Something else?
marc__marc (2025-03-17 23:36:00+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour ces améliorations.
il semble cependant y avoir une confusion entre station (l'ensemble de la zone comprenant les bornes) et 2 bornes elle-même).
j'ai ajouté des informations à ce sujet, n'hésitez pas à les vérifier.
j'ignore également quelle borne a les prises type 2, combo-ccs et chademo
Cordialement,
Marc
user_3022894 (2024-11-14 13:23:32+00:00): Hallo Jörg,

schön, dass du weiterhin so aktiv dabei bist :-)

LG Lukas
gurglypipe (2024-11-10 15:37:20+00:00): Are you sure the roads in Ripley St Thomas (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/433800865) have a 10mph speed limit? I agree there’s a campus-wide speed limit of 10mph on the RLI campus, but Ripley St Thomas is separate.

What’s your source for this information?
dmfr (2024-11-14 19:02:43+00:00): Olá! A via central da Avenida da Boavista não é highway=bus_guide, uma vez que a via não possui infraestrutura específica para autocarros, nem exclui carros de circularem lá (mesmo que não seja legalmente permitido). Por este motivo, a utilização anterior de highway=busway é correta. Pedia o favor de corrigir.
tastrax (2024-11-11 07:19:00+00:00): When adding addr:state its preferred to use the abbreviated state in uppercase (ie VIC) . I have just updated all the edits in this area. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Address_State_Formats

Cheers - Phil
dhx1 (2024-11-11 07:46:39+00:00): Thank you!
habi (2024-11-11 08:52:29+00:00): Please stop making a note for each and every of your map changes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4514299
gurglypipe (2024-11-10 15:42:44+00:00): Hiya, did you mean to change https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219044962 to access=permissive? That would indicate that the default access for that track is permissive, but the tracks either side of it are marked as access=private.

access=private is the norm for farm tracks

Thanks in advance :)
andym797 (2024-11-10 16:18:06+00:00): I'm taking it from the change in ROW, farm track is now the ROW https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/645e08f9ad8a03001138b36d/ROW-3282626_ETC_OD.docx
gurglypipe (2024-11-17 22:55:08+00:00): Thanks, that makes sense. The ROW order only refers to public footpaths (not BOATs or any wider permissions), so I’ve changed it to access=private foot=designated, which is the most specific tagging for a private farm track which is a designated footpath.

I’ve also added designation=public_footpath as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom#Public_footpaths

Changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159262334, let me know if there’s any problems with them

Thanks!
ftcat (2024-11-11 06:13:39+00:00): Hi as this road only provides access to Mutinondo it should be classified as a service road as per the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=service?uselang=en-GB
:::r:::b:::r:::t::: (2024-11-12 12:00:32+00:00): Hello,

I do not agree that this is a service road but I am not interested in changing back and forth so will leave it as it is.
Enock4seth (2024-11-13 10:16:33+00:00): Hi Johnson, 

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for mapping. "Bing aerial imagery" is very out-of-date in most parts of Ghana, kindly use "Esri World Imagery" which seems to be more recent. You can always compare Bing/Esri to see which more recent before using either to add new data into OSM. 

Also zoom in enough to see existing objects before adding new ones to avoid overlapping and duplicate features.

Further more it's not necessary to add your name to the changeset comments. Find out about Good changeset comments at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

If you have any further questions here are OSM Community channels => https://openstreetmap.community/?map=7.90109,-1.15841&zoom=5.00

Happy Mapping.
SomeoneElse (2024-11-12 14:24:23+00:00): Hello,
I've no idea what "osm-relatify git#91d26e5" is, but this changeset duplicated a whole bunch of ways around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1332627943 .
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2024-11-12 15:46:10+00:00): See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/what-is-osm-relatify-and-is-there-a-problem-with-it/121526 .
Dawid2849 (2024-11-11 09:27:45+00:00): Dzięki za aktualizację sektorów do stanu po rozbudowie cmentarza
Władysław Komorek (2024-11-11 09:31:24+00:00): Próbuje naprawić Wyszukiwarkę grobów na OSM https://wlakom.github.io/gravemap-osm/
i przy okazji aktualizuję groby.
Colbertson (2024-11-10 16:53:53+00:00): Thanks for fixing that :)
Its good to have people on quality control
Dawid2849 (2024-11-19 17:41:59+00:00): Zabrakło historic=memorial tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12328809677

Poprawiłem
Władysław Komorek (2024-11-19 19:15:58+00:00): Dziękuję i liczę na dalszą pomoc.
eggie (2024-11-10 16:03:18+00:00): Dag Treonas.. Er liggen nu twee gebouwen op elkaar.
Wellicht kun je de gebouwen opnieuw laten importeren via het forum van OSM. Draadje BAG importverzoeken.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43
name=Woonhuis heb ik verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-11-10 16:04:25+00:00): Zie ook https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Bredenkampweg+2&objectId=0797200000830184&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=138589.15753620383&geometry.y=412915.19920277054&zoomlevel=15
eggie (2024-11-10 16:06:27+00:00): Wanneer de BAG (Kadaster)  niet klopt kun je het beste een terugmelding doen via bovenstaande site.
eggie (2024-11-10 16:16:22+00:00): De overlap heb ik aangepast.
Treonas (2024-11-10 22:46:07+00:00): Hallo, dank voor de aanpassingen: alles lijkt in orde.  Anders dan in de BAG Viewer zijn 2 en 4 niet aan elkaar verbonden maar 2 aparte huizen met een minimale tussenruimte.
eggie (2024-11-10 22:49:31+00:00): Denk ook dat het zo wel klopt. Ik gebruik de laatste recente PDOK luchtfoto. Daar kun je de nieuwbouw zien. 
Groet
eggie