piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
micheleOSM3 (2025-06-16 19:23:52+00:00): Hai notato che c'è un tag wikidata? Secondo wikidata sembra che la posizione corretta non è quella che hai impostato.
Matteo Calosi (2025-06-16 19:40:32+00:00): Questo https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31631437?
Non corrisponde neanche alla posizione precedente (sta sul ghiaione sotto), andrebbe corretto wikidata ma non ho idea come si faccia
micheleOSM3 (2025-06-16 20:17:20+00:00): Ho provato a vedere su JOSM sia le CTRN 5000 che le ortofoto IRDAT. A me sembra che le CTRN 5000 indicano che il Monte Messer è nel cerchio blu a 2228,3 metri mentre nel cerchio rosso c'è una vetta senza nome a 2224,4 metri. Dalle ortofoto sembra che le 2 vette corrispondano alla cresta. Io non sono mai salito in cima, ma se le tue modifiche sono corrette allora sono sbagliate sia wikidata sia le CTRN 5000... sei sicuro della tua modifica? allego immagine: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UU-xdPQck9-YzL66wuXUMSnrkxNVbxZ6/view?usp=sharing
Matteo Calosi (2025-06-16 22:04:48+00:00): Allora, ci sono due risalti adiacenti sul crinale, sul posto le indicazioni di vetta sono solo sulla cima sud che a occhio sembra anche un po' più alta. Sono andato a guardare la carta e la CTR la interpreto diversamente, 2228.3 è la cima nord e 2224.4 dal punto di riferimento è la selletta fra cima nord e cima sud, ma quest'ultima non è quotata ma ha la stessa curva di livello quindi 2225-2230. La cima 2230 IGM (da cui Tabacco) sembra corrispondere più alla vetta sud anche se non sono ben distinguibili a quella risoluzione. Nel complesso per me meglio tenere la vetta sulla cima sud.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1az5_YAmEIJuQV9mBbWDrAb8jAe1Mcprg/view?usp=sharing
micheleOSM3 (2025-06-17 03:34:50+00:00): Ok, probabilmente le tue valutazioni sono più corrette. Le CTR in questo caso sono un po' strane, in effetti il punto 2224.4 sembra la selletta e non la vetta, mentre la vetta non è quotata. Forse sarebbe meglio mettere una nota per i futuri mappatori.
michael_ua (2025-06-15 13:20:19+00:00): Чому ви позначили територію як будівля? Виправте це. А також не потрібно мапити кожну присадибну ділянку окремим полігоном.
Baloo Uriza (2025-06-17 21:11:31+00:00): Mostly good but really should be split where the number of lanes does.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167630769
urbalazs (2025-06-15 08:50:59+00:00): Miért törölted az 5 km-es sebességkorlátozást és a gyalogosokra felhívó veszélyjelző táblát? 3 napja voltam ott, akkor még kint voltak. Azóta eltávolították őket? Az utak pedig kétsávosak, felezővonallal elválasztottak. Egyértelműen gépjárműforgalomra készültek.
Kecsege (2025-06-15 12:34:06+00:00): A városháza parkról beszélünk?
Itt régen parkoló volt, most egy ideiglenes park, később teljes egészében átépül igazi parkká. De már most sincsenek itt autók, át van adva az embereknek. Ezért vettem le a szervizutakat és írtam át footway-re. Nem a napokban jártam arra, így a táblákkal lehet hibáztam, de footway-en autós sebességkorlátozásnak, gyalogos veszélyre való felhívásnak nem látom értelmét.
urbalazs (2025-06-15 16:55:28+00:00): Igen, a városháza parkról. Valóban nem parkoló már, de fizikai akadálya sincs, hogy autóval behajtsanak, mindhárom oldalról behajthatnak. Lehet, hogy majd valamikor tényleg park lesz, de most még inkább parkolón belüli szervizút, mint gyalogút.
Kecsege (2025-06-15 20:08:42+00:00): Nem tudom mikor tudok újra arra járni, hogy megnézzem. Ha ezt így hibásnak gondolod, elfogadom.
alrekur (2025-11-14 20:01:07+00:00): The section of the Devil's Path from Prediger road to the Overlook Trail is part of the Overlook Turnpike Primitive Bicycle Corridor so should be bicycle=yes. I have changed it back. Otherwise good work on fixing bike access tags. I have seen and corrected a number of bike=yes on informal paths in wilderness areas myself.
eggie (2025-06-15 08:01:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:05:37+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12915678262/history has shop = boutique that was added in this edit
shop=boutique? Is it shop selling clothes? Then maybe shop=clothes would fit well, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=clothes

Or maybe shop=fashion_accessories ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=fashion_accessories ) would fit better? Or shop=bag ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=bag ) ?

Or is it some completely different type of shop, with tag used as "boutique" is French word for shop? In such case see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for some documented values.

For shop=boutique info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=boutique page
Grass-snake (2025-06-15 17:07:07+00:00): Здравствуйте, проверьте пожалуйста названия улиц в СНТ Березка-2, по данным ФИАС там названия идут цифрами (1-я улица, 2-я улица, …).
Grass-snake (2025-06-22 20:14:35+00:00): Не дождался ответа, исправил как посчитал нужным.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167974638
dieterdreist (2025-07-11 21:45:12+00:00): Ciao Davlak,

ho visto che hai cambiato railway=stop in railway=station per una delle stop position di Villa Bonelli. In realtà quella non è una station ma un halt, il tag è railway=halt e non va sul binario (ce ne sono già 2 in realtà, con la tua aggiunta erano 3). L'ho già sistemato,

un saluto,
Martin
dieterdreist (2025-07-11 21:51:09+00:00): Vedo ora anche la fermata Magliana cambiata da railway=halt a railway=station. Come anche Fiera di Roma, Parco Leonardo, Palmiro Togliatti, Tor Sapienza e Tor di Nona. Secondo le mie ricerche nessuna di queste è una stazione, non hanno deviatori.

Saluti,
Martin
silversurfer83 (2025-06-15 12:30:49+00:00): Hi Drahtochse :)

du hast einige WEA abgeändert. Meist war das die Entfernung des lifecycle prefixes. Alles gut.
Was fehlt: Die meisten der Anlagen haben eine "note". Die passt nicht mehr zu deinen Änderungen. Sollte sie also mittlerweile in Betrieb sein, bitte die note auch entfernen. Danke.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167631850
Drahtochse (2025-06-15 14:58:03+00:00): Hi Silversurfer,

ich habe das in Changeset 167655048 korrigiert. Danke fürs aufmerksam machen.

Gruß,
Drahtochse
silversurfer83 (2025-06-15 16:55:15+00:00): Danke dir :)
AndreaDp271 (2025-06-15 07:46:45+00:00): too big area, you can't do a mega changeset
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167631970
Sylabowy Kot (2025-06-15 22:29:41+00:00): If you have to load a totally different area in JOSM for your changes category, just upload your changes and open a new session. It's not funny if there's such a large bbox across the oceans just because there're US military bases everywhere.
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:38:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168127991 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:56:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168128627 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
fortera_au (2025-06-26 08:38:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168127991 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: spam mapping
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-21 00:32:17+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18372
user_5359 (2025-06-15 12:04:53+00:00): Hello! Please have a llok on https://www.osm.org/way=291836801. What is the mean of the tag space = void?
silversurfer83 (2025-06-15 12:25:37+00:00): Hi :)

das Thema "Namen an Zufahrten" hatten wir schonmal. Dies ist eine private Zufahrt und die hat nichts mit der gewidmeten Straße, von der sie abzweigt, zu tun. Es ist nicht nötig, sie für Navis zu benennen, da das Gebäude, welches hier erschlossen wird, sauber adressiert ist.

Name wurde vorläufig wieder entfernt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167633680
Niederpruem (2025-06-15 21:28:53+00:00): ok, akzeptiert.
CooperR (2025-06-15 02:26:39+00:00): Should've also added: "Added Operator."

Oh well.
iandees (2025-06-15 12:51:37+00:00): Thanks for adding addresses to these schools! Something to consider for future changes: In OSM we usually prefer to put addresses on specific buildings or points inside buildings, since multiple buildings on a school campus can have different addresses. Even if there's a single building, it's helpful to put the address where the main entrance is.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167634293
NeisBot (2025-06-28 14:45:51+00:00): Hi HOM420, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 93% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 20 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=167634595
NeisReview (2025-07-05 19:29:08+00:00): #golf #mapping
DLZ2024 (2025-06-16 01:54:27+00:00): Should have stated that it is located in Novesta Township, MI. not Evergreen.
fortera_au (2025-06-16 07:25:44+00:00): Hi, greens shouldn't be mapped inside of fairway/rough ways, the fairway/rough should be mapped as a multipolygon, with anything inside of it marked as an inner of that multipolygon. How this is currently mapped says that the green is also the rough, which is obviously wrong. You've also done the same thing with sand traps, these should be inners of a multipolygon relationship if they're entirely surrounded by a fairway/rough.
Joseph R P (2025-06-21 15:31:18+00:00): These sort of roadways would be better classified as links tagged based on which roads they link to rather than as actual roads since they are ramps linking roads rather than actual named roads themselves.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-06-21 16:34:24+00:00): Okay. Well, they are classified as collector/distributor roads, which would usually be classed as tertiary roads in the US.
Joseph R P (2025-06-21 18:08:47+00:00): I think this is the conflation of two different types of roads with different purposes that simply share the same name. The most common use for "collector road" refers to the bulk of the streets tagged as tertiary in the Las Vegas Valley. The other use of "collector road" applicable to these sort of ramps would be a more informal term for collector-distributor lanes, which do not serve as busier streets that traffic uses to get from local residential streets to the larger arterial roads, but rather are to separate traffic from the mainline highway between close-by interchanges, collecting all exiting/entering freeway traffic into a single consolidated ramp and reducing merging with thru traffic. These sort of roadways may occasionally have names/signed numbers, especially the longer multi-lane ones that are just as wide as the mainline freeway (see those along I 95 through Fredericksburg and 495 in Alexandria, VA), but generally they are both treated by traffic and designated by DOTs as just highway ramps, albeit longer and more complex than your typical slip lane or exit ramp. Since both the I 15 and US 95 ramps that were tagged as tertiary are both signed simply as exits rather than local lanes part of the main freeway, the best tag for them would be motorway links.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-06-21 21:09:17+00:00): Okay, thank you for informing me! I would have never known the difference between those two types of collector/distributor roads, especially when online queries don't help at all. How could I learn such things in the future?
P.S., when I search for the reference code of such a road (i.e., IR15SCD01, which means "Interstate Route 15 Southbound Collector/Distributor Road 1"), all I get are news outlets saying "ramp from Russell Road to Blue Diamond Road is closed due to traffic or an accident," none of which actually explain this category of road. I only know about these classifications thanks to the Nevada DOT's official list/map of state-maintained highways.
Joseph R P (2025-06-21 21:49:47+00:00): Wikipedia does have an article on collector roads—when referring to the street type (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collector_road) and an article about the local/express highway configuration, which does cover collector/distributor lanes within it (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local%E2%80%93express_lanes) (note that information won't be 1:1 with OSM classification criteria, but the info should be enough to give a general idea).

The best way of identifying these kinds of roads would probably be just through personal judgement. A narrower frontage-road like roadway that parallels the mainline freeway and links close-together interchanges to the main carriageways of the freeway can be assumed to be a collector-distributor lane and thus a type of long exit ramp rather than a separate freeway or a traditional frontage road.

The alternative would be to check official government maps. Not the TIGER-sourced background layers used you may find in an ArcGIS map, but a source that manually adds the roads like the CC OpenWeb, which labels these sort of roads as ramps in the Assessor Map layer.
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-06-22 16:27:38+00:00): Okay, thanks for informing me! I'll check them out.
nivek101 (2025-06-16 20:42:53+00:00): Thank you!
Convectional (2025-12-11 11:26:10+00:00): way/1395424247 duplicate of West Yuhua Road?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167635736
sahshoor (2025-09-13 15:05:08+00:00): Hi :) I was wondering if there is a reason to have two ways for one platform? I intend to merge into one way per one platform.

Thanks
binmo (2025-09-15 03:21:42+00:00): I believe the exposed platform on the east is uncovered and the 2 semi-circle gaps have a shelter/roof, where as the rest is more underground (but only mentioning covered=yes like the semi-circle gaps).
binmo (2025-09-15 03:29:25+00:00): It would be sensible to merge them and include the covered=yes just to mention that there is shelter in that area. Agree it would be efficient merge.
sahshoor (2025-10-01 14:58:30+00:00): Oh I should have compared the tags haha. I forgot one side was uncovered, I think I'll leave that detail in there.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-28 13:35:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12916658097/history - have you tried to map a cave entrance here?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-28 13:35:25+00:00): If not, what it is?
__yoshita__ (2025-08-28 17:56:45+00:00): Hello, thank you for checking.
I did not intend to map a cave entrance here. This node is meant to represent Kahokudō (河伯洞), the former residence of novelist Hino Ashihei in Kitakyushu.
It is a historic house and cultural property, not a cave.

Best regards,
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-29 12:38:12+00:00): ops, autotranslate went wrong then - sorry!

I see opening_hours - is it a small museum that you can visit?
__yoshita__ (2025-08-29 14:31:52+00:00): Thanks for clarifying!
It is open to the public as a small museum, and the opening_hours were taken directly from the notice board at the entrance.

Best regards,
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-29 17:53:34+00:00): then I will change tagging to mark it as museum (and it will appear as a POI now, somehow your editor put it as amenity=fixme without any specific tags - see https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/880 )

you can see how tagging changed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12916658097/history - and feel free to revert/amend/change it

(after all, I never was there at all - or even in Japan. And thanks for mapping it! )
__yoshita__ (2025-08-29 19:12:55+00:00): I checked your changeset and it looks good to me — thanks for updating!
aaei924 (2025-07-10 03:59:49+00:00): 안녕하세요, 본 바뀜집합을 비롯해 '도로 위계 일부 수정'과 관련된 편집사항에 관하여 여쭐 것이 있습니다. 위계를 수정하실 때 어떤 기준을 적용하셨나요?
chiho_kang (2025-07-10 11:19:25+00:00): 안녕하세요. 제 편집에 관심을 갖고 답글 남겨주셔서 감사합니다. 해당 바뀜집합의 경우 서울특별시에서 제공한 서울시 도로 기능별 구분정보와 지구단위계획 지형도면 등에 고시된 도로 기능 등을 참고하였으며, 주간선도로에 해당하는 도로를 `highway=primary`로, 보조간선도로에 해당하는 도로는 `secondary`, 집산도로는 `tertiary` 등으로 설정했습니다.
chiho_kang (2025-07-10 11:22:04+00:00): 도로의 법적, 물리적 구분보다 기능적 중요도를 기준으로 도로 위계를 설정한다는 [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Highway_key_voting_importance OSM 위키 내용]을 근거로 편집했습니다.
aaei924 (2025-07-10 14:30:20+00:00): 설명해 주셔서 감사합니다. 사실 도로의 중요도라는 것이 그다지 명백한 개념은 아니다 보니, 기준에 대해 관점이 다양합니다. 그래서 이를 어느 정도 중재하는 차원에서 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:한국의%20도로 페이지를 현재 기준으로 삼고 있는데, 여러가지로 부족하다는 의견이 많아 개편을 추진 중입니다. 기능적 중요도를 감안해야 한다는 견해에도 동감하며, 커뮤니티에 남겨 주셨던 의견도 잘 보았습니다. 아무튼, 편집에 있어서 기존의 방향을 뒤집고자 하는 경우라면 어느 정도 합의가 필요하지 않은가 싶습니다. 이렇게 편집하셨던 도로 일부는 실제로 다른 사용자에 의해 되돌려진 상태입니다...
chiho_kang (2025-07-11 03:38:07+00:00): 네 확인했습니다.
충분한 의견 개진 및 도출된 합의 사항 없이 성급하게 바꿨다는 점에 동의하며, 불요한 논란을 일으키지 않기 위해 해당 부분 관련하여 추가적인 편집 및 수정은 하고 있지 않은 상태라는 점 또한 알려드립니다.
혹 해당 논점과 관련된 합의 사항 등이 존재한다면 알려주시면 감사하겠습니다.
bxl-forever (2025-06-15 09:01:49+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Proxy Delhaize Ma Campagne is already on the map.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/282464794

I wish to raise your attention that "Organic Maps" is not recommended for OSM editing.  The main reason is because the data you see in that app often lags behind (weeks, possibly months).  We often have to remove duplicate objects added by users who believe that shops are missing.

Have a nice day.
aharvey (2025-06-16 00:47:43+00:00): hi, Google Street View can't be used to derived data from adding to OSM, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

There are street imagery providers you can use including Bing Streetside and Mapillary, these are available from within the iD editor, but these don't show any max weight signs.

If you're making this edit based on your ground survey that's okay.
UncleZhanger (2025-06-20 21:56:00+00:00): Hi, thanks for the advice. I didn’t know about the google rule. It is based on my ground survey, the only reason I noticed it was that Osmand navigated me there with an overweight truck, then I saw the sign and I had to go around the block.
5R-MFT (2025-06-15 13:18:30+00:00): Wenn das ein Verkaufsautomat ist muss das wie folgt gemappt werden.

amenity=vending_machine
vending=honey

Damit man das passend bezahlen kann noch zum Beispiel 
payment:coins=yes
Mehr Details dazu im Wiki z.B. auch welche Münzen akzeptiert werden.
:)
fortera_au (2025-07-15 12:30:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 168963114 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: incorrect source, no valid source provided
kamasytrix (2025-06-15 11:20:05+00:00): Bing Maps Aerial це дуже застарілі знімки, використовуйте Esri
kamasytrix (2025-06-15 11:14:48+00:00): Добрий день, не потрібно кожну зміну вносити окремим редагування якщо ви редагуєте якийсь невеликий *квартал*, також житлова зона робиться не під окремий участок, а одна велика в межах доріг. Будівлі які ви зообразили мають рівні кути, використовуйте клавішу q що б їх вирівняти. Дякую
sejtam (2025-06-15 06:35:11+00:00): I found no way to specify that access is for motorcycles only. (no distinction between cars and otorcycles). The width should make sure cars cannot use it, but do mapping utilities take that into account?
Note that while the SDE highway is a toll road, toll does not apply to motorcycles, hence this shortcut to allow access to the SDE w/o detour
The Grand Monarch - Ujjain (2025-06-15 06:45:47+00:00): Address: The Grand Monarch - Hotel, Dewas Rd, near Narayana e-Techno School, Mahalaxmi Nagar, Nagziri, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh 456010
Phone: 077239 99157
user_5359 (2025-06-16 14:11:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1395435227. What is the mean of the tag wilayah = desa sungai terap
?
user_5359 (2025-06-16 14:08:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please what is the mean of tag "Εργαστήριο Διδακτικής Θετικών Επιστημών" = "Εργαστήριο Διδακτικής Θετικών Επιστημών". I will remove this mistake.
0000FF berries (2025-06-17 23:17:15+00:00): Hello user_5359. Thank you for looking after the map :)

While the addition by Nikos was a mistake, please do not make such deletions. You can consider either changing it to a fixme or a note and directing the user to the Greek forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/gr/68 

Thanks again :)
0000FF berries (2025-06-17 23:26:41+00:00): Καλως ήρθες Νίκο :) Να είσαι καλά που θες να βελτιώσεις τα δεδομένα στο OpenStreetMap :)

Στο https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167638362 φαίνεται να θες να προσθέσεις ένα εργαστήριο. Αν αναφέρεσαι σε συγκεκριμένη αίθουσα που δεν αλλάζει κάθε χρόνο, τότε εγώ θα την χαρτογραφούσα ως εξής:
θα σχεδίαζα το περίγραμμά της, και θα πρόσθετα τις ετικέτες 
indoor=room
room= classroom 
name=Εργαστήριο Διδακτικής Θετικών Επιστημών (εκτός αν η αίθουσα έχει άλλο όνομα, ή χρησιμοποιείται για διαφορετικά εργαστήρια. Τότε, αντί για name= θα έβαζα description=)

Αν έχεις απορίες μπορείς να μου στείλεις μήνυμα, να ρωτήσεις στο ελληνικό τμήμα του φόρουμ (https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/gr/68), ή στο κανάλι που έχουμε οι εθελοντές στο Matrix (https://matrix.to/#/#osm-gr:matrix.org - θέλει εγγραφή).

Να 'σαι καλά και πάλι και καλές χαρτογραφήσεις :)
osmviborg (2025-06-15 08:09:53+00:00): Closed: https://ibb.co/Vp5hwhSt
Jan Olieslagers (2025-06-15 08:25:37+00:00): So you removed this little aerodrome? Why?
osmviborg (2025-06-15 08:32:13+00:00): Closed six months ago.
Jan Olieslagers (2025-06-15 08:48:56+00:00): AAAARRGH so you mean the aerodrome closed? I really understood you meant the changeset had been closed, which left me much confused.

However, what you did is not the best idea, in my (not so very) humble opinion. I will gladly believe that the aerodrome closed, but instead of removing it you had better added "closed:" or "disused:" tagging, that would have avoided re-adding the field, as I am sure may now happen.
Unless you dissuade me, I intend to re-add the field, properly tagged as being disused.
Kind regards from far-away Portugal!
osmviborg (2025-06-15 08:59:50+00:00): You are looking at old air pictures, click the link above, the airfield is gone.
Jan Olieslagers (2025-06-15 09:18:13+00:00): Again, I do believe the aerodrome is disused, no argument there. And yes, it is dangerous to rely on www imagery, it is never completely up to date.
osmviborg (2025-06-15 09:21:28+00:00): https://dataforsyningen.dk/map/2776
Qwajo OSM (2025-06-20 06:51:00+00:00): Hi Mapper, this is not a good way to map a road. Different roads meeting at a junction should be represented as such. And this is not a significant road to map. Thanks and keep mapping
eggie (2025-06-15 08:02:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
TheNightRider (2025-06-26 19:49:10+00:00): Hi CjMalone! I saw your bulk edit and so I checked the JOANN store within walking distance to me that I had tagged about 2 months ago as about to close:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7278959378
It didn't get edited. Maybe because you saw I was working on it? Anyway, I'm about to leave the house and will check its status on the ground. Thanks!
TheNightRider (2025-06-27 01:53:56+00:00): Survey result today: osm.org/node/7278959378 is completely empty of merchandise and only shelving remains. It could return as any type of shop, so did not use disused:shop=craft
PierZen (2025-08-21 15:49:42+00:00): Thank you for your contribution but try to make smaller changeset areas.
jcrow (2025-10-07 21:02:11+00:00): This and a few others exist as backup stops in case of temporary route closures. They look like any other stop as you walk by but they aren't normally on any route. Is there a way to tag them accordingly?
jcrow (2025-10-07 21:08:04+00:00): Sorry, by "this" I meant Node 10831198808 bikuben.