piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jackripper1 (2024-11-05 00:26:47+00:00): Vale. No sabía que la muni actualizó su mapa con las últimas poblaciones. 
Ahora, la cartografía comunal de la muni tiene algunos errores, y me consta. Hay varias calles que en la cartografía dice una cosa y en terreno otra (te puedo dar ejemplos si quieres). Incluso algunas veces el mapa del SII discrepa con la cartografía comunal. Por eso te pregunto si visitaste la calle. Cuando el mapa dice una cosa y el terreno otra, sigo el principio «On the ground» de OSM, por lo que, en mi opinión debe mantenerse lo que se dice en terreno.
Ahora, en el caso específico de esta calle en cuestión (Huairavillo), me parece muy extraño porque no se me ocurre ningun otro caso similar en Puerto Montt (que el nombre se interrumpa y continúe en otra calle paralela que no conecta con la primera).
Visité la población hace un mes y en las siguientes cuatro esquinas, marcadas en rojo, hay un letrero que dice «Cormorán Antártico»:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ATi8JJu5Nq_fSmqBov14KqhcEear1VKG/view?usp=sharing
Bueno, de todas maneras, tampoco es un asunto de vida o muerte. Solamente reiterar que que es evidente que hay un error por parte de la muni y que este tipo de errores (letreros mal puestos o nombre incorrecto en cartografía comunal) han ocurrido otras veces. El tema es que hasta el momento no sabemos cuál es el nombre correcto, aunque debiera mantenerse el que hay en terreno.
Saludos.
eggie (2024-10-27 19:18:53+00:00): Dag Aronyx

De weg staat nu op motor_vehicle=destination.
Dat heeft trouwens ook effect op moped en mofa.
mofa= yes moped=yes hier? 
Welk bord staat hier vooraan?
oneway:mofa=no ontbreekt nog zie ik.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-10-27 19:22:44+00:00): Ik heb motor_vehicle=destination verwijderd.
Dat is een tag van jaren terug. Volgens mij staat er geen bord alleen bewoners (meer).
MVG
eggie
mcliquid (2024-11-06 13:24:11+00:00): Hi, welche Beschilderung rechtfertigt "access=private"? Die Kombination 250er und 259er würde vehicle=no und foot=no ermöglichen, aber ich kenne kein deutsches Schild nach StVZO, welches access=no bedeutet. Denn dann dürfte nicht mal die Müllabfuhr, der Postbote oder der Rettungswagen dort hinfahren.
https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE?signs=DE:250;259
tirek (2024-11-06 19:49:52+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung! Ich bin mir in der Tat nicht ganz sicher, wann welcher Access-Tag angemessen ist. Die Verkehrszeichen sind VZ250 und VZ54. Außerdem sind Schilder mit den Aufdrucken "Privatgrundstück", "Warnung vor dem Hunde!" und "Privatweg - Durchgang und Durchfahrt verboten" angebracht. Ja, es sind wirklich 5 Schilder an einem Pfosten! Was das für Post (ggf. mit Auto) und Müllabfuhr rechtlich bedeutet, weiß ich nicht. Rettung, Feuerwehr und Polizei dürfen im Einsatz ohnehin überall hin, oder? Was trage ich da am besten ein? (PS Ob die Schilder legal dort hängen, weiß ich nicht. Das ist eine benannte (gewidmete?) Straße, die durch diese Schilder unterbrochen wird.)
rab (2024-10-31 18:41:05+00:00): crossing buildings,
not squared
martinst (2024-11-30 09:03:35+00:00): Sie schon in Changeset 155998749 erwähnt: Bitte keine Großbuchstaben in Namen verwenden, wenn dessen Worte in der üblichen Rechtschreibung auch nicht groß geschrieben werden.
Rogoyski (2025-05-21 18:13:09+00:00): Zgodnie z uwagą https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4678215 awaria już zakończona. Proszę o czuwanie nad wprowadzanymi przez siebie czasowymi zmianami w organizacji ruchu.
Fischkopp0815 (2024-10-28 01:56:45+00:00): Da müssten dann an der Ecke Siegfried-Lenz-Weg/Claus-Harms-Str. Schilder Einbahnstraße(DE:220) noch Norden und Süden weisend stehen. Die habe ich da nicht gesehen.Der Siegfried-Lenz-Weg ist in dem Bereich eine unechte Einbahnstraße, also eine Straße, in welche die Einfahrt zwar von einer Seite verboten ist, auf der Fahrzeuge aber in beide Richtungen fahren dürfen. Oder habe ich die Einbahnstraßen-Schilder übersehen?
jimbojones (2024-10-28 10:27:02+00:00): Moin, das stimmt, die habe ich auch nicht gesehen. Also ist es nur eine Einfahrtsbeschränkung von Norden und Süden jeweils Richtung Claus-Harms-Strasse.
Kann man das in OSM entsprechend kenntlich machen.
Ändere das sonst gerne entspechend, ich lasse dann jetzt die Finger davon :-)
Fischkopp0815 (2024-10-28 11:30:23+00:00): Ich habe das oneway wieder entfernt.
Die Zufahrtsbeschränkungen sind schon seit Längerem in Form von OSM_Abbiegebeschränkungen eingetragen.
im OSM-Wiki hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:restriction

Die Beschränkungen werden in Form von Relationen in den OSM-Daten dargestellt. Streetcomplete kann damit wohl nichts anfangen.In ID sollte man die aber erstellen/bearbeiten können.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5432569
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5432571
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5432565
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5432568
Fischkopp0815 (2024-10-28 01:56:17+00:00): Da müssten dann an der Ecke Siegfried-Lenz-Weg/Claus-Harms-Str. Schilder Einbahnstraße(DE:220) noch Norden und Süden weisend stehen. Die habe ich da nicht gesehen.Der Siegfried-Lenz-Weg ist in dem Bereich eine unechte Einbahnstraße, also eine Straße, in welche die Einfahrt zwar von einer Seite verboten ist, auf der Fahrzeuge aber in beide Richtungen fahren dürfen. Oder habe ich die Einbahnstraßen-Schilder übersehen?
ivanbranco (2024-10-30 23:41:50+00:00): Please, stop adding fake elements as castles and nursing homes.

As other people told you before, in Italy we do not add addresses as building properties.

Please add addr:street together with addr:housenumber.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-10-28 21:29:06+00:00): Hi, using path is correct for bicycle-pedestrian roads.

More info on mapping cycleways

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-cycleways-in-estonia/104894
lefuturiste (2024-10-27 21:24:46+00:00): Merci, bien vu !
Fraxi (2024-10-27 21:36:43+00:00): Към source: или по-точно "сверяване с резултатите от търсачката, първия от които води към studio24.bg" и се вижда, че има такъв обект
fs_LT (2025-04-09 14:13:42+00:00): Ist das auf der Straße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54834869 wirklich ein "traffic_sign=AT:52.6b"? Fahrverbot für Motorräder ausgenommen landw. Bringung?
Road–Runner (2025-04-10 09:55:20+00:00): ja das war ein tippfehler von mir. sollte AT:52.6c sein.
fs_LT (2025-04-10 10:25:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164761509
trial (2026-06-10 07:47:01+00:00): Salut, par l'ajout de l'arboretum, tu as créé un multipolygone invalide. Il faudrait soit passer en type=site (mon préféré) ou découper les ways pour ne mettre que le contour extérieur commun entre le Jardin de l’Aigle Blanc et l’Arboretum.
josmougn (2026-06-11 21:26:46+00:00): tu parles de cette relation : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18217065 ?
Qu'est-ce qu'elle a d'invalide ?
trial (2026-06-12 07:35:52+00:00): Oui. Exactement ce que je dit ;-). Ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18217065#map=19/48.773563/2.269451&layers=N tu as une partie commune qui est "extérieure" de chaque côté. Donc soit on met une relation de type site (le plus simple) soit il faut créer un contour extérieur (bof). subarea ça n'existe que pour les boundary, sinon ce n'était pas mal.
Glassman (2024-10-28 00:31:27+00:00): A couple of recommendations. At the roundabout, The links connecting to DC53 should also be named DC53, not DJ663.

Second, It looks like you acidentally connect the road, DJ663 to the residential landuse. Since the two objects are different type they are not usually connected.

The rest looks great. Happy mapping
KlopanRin (2024-10-27 21:46:22+00:00): i was too tired to write an actually meaningful change set comment
emersonveenstra (2024-10-29 22:39:34+00:00): Hi there,

For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1328657605, did you mean for "Old Garfield Road" to be the name?
user_5359 (2024-10-29 14:33:43+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/577255160 (only one example). What is the meaning of the key int_name_2023? Did you mean int_name:2023 (valid for year 2023) or int_name:-2023 (until year 2023)?
iRewer (2024-10-31 08:35:20+00:00): Hi! Sorry for delay (didn't notice).

I thought that the only usage of colon is language subgroup. My gut intention was to use colon (pun) but I was afraid to break something :)

In Belarus we use Cyrillic script. In 2007 we got legal specification for transcription of Belarusian Cyrillic to Belarusian Latin in geonames. Later this specs were approved by UN as the recommended ones.

But in 2023 our government decided to fight with diacritic signs and 'Polish influence' from political reasons. We got new specification.

But the first one from 2007 is still recognized by international community as sole one.

So I wrote small Mac app for myself to convert using both rules and I used it for PT.

If the colon is more proper in this case I'll change it.

Thank you for you attention! Looking forward for advice
trigpoint (2024-10-28 11:07:48+00:00): Hi
Please do not misuse the name tag for descriptions.
Most phoneboxes don't have a name, so shouldn't have a name tag.

Cheers Phil
WillFR130 (2024-10-28 20:12:04+00:00): Hi Phil
Thanks for pointing that mistake out. I did not mean to type "Telephone Box" in the name section of OSMand. 
It was a simple mistake while chatting to someone. 
I will add however in rural Wales most phoneboxes do have individual names written inside. Usually relating to the nearest house, farm, pub, spring or religious building. But I have not added these names yet. 

Thank you for your help

Cheers Will
trigpoint (2024-10-29 10:16:16+00:00): Hi Will
Phoneboxes have a descriptive location, to be used when making emergency calls. That could be mapped, I am not sure if there is a tag for it but it is certainly not the name tag. We certainly map the phonenumber.

I noticed that you have add disused:amenity to this object, yet amenity=phonebox is stll there.
If it is no longer used it should be disused:amenity=phonebox. As it stands it still renders and will appear in searches, which can be misleading to map users.

Cheers Phil
citrula (2024-10-29 09:58:46+00:00): When mapping buildings, please only map the building itself. Don't include the parking lot, front lawn, etc. Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158433363
IIVQ (2025-07-13 16:26:38+00:00): Hello, you changed a lot of this line into railway=narrow_gauge, but as far as I know, it's normal gauge. I changed it to railway=rail!
Kioska Journo (2025-07-13 16:32:24+00:00): My bad, my memory failed me, I should have checked Wikipedia instead
IIVQ (2025-07-13 18:15:24+00:00): No problem! I found it doing a big change from railway=preserved to railway:preserved=yes
tyfi (2024-10-27 22:18:26+00:00): "Stone Crest Drive" is actually "Stonecrest Drive" without a space
tyfi (2024-10-27 22:40:06+00:00): This fixed up the sidewalk along and made Konert Lake Drive less jagged.
Jrachi (2024-11-30 14:44:49+00:00): Ciao.
Sto controllando le route hiking con il network=lcn
Che sono incompatibili!
route=hiking + network=lwn
           oppure
route=bicycle/mtb + network=lcn

Ivo
Jrachi (2025-03-14 08:45:51+00:00): Nessuna risposta!
Cancello il tag
Joseph R P (2024-11-13 01:43:00+00:00): Hello. Generally, it is acceptable for 'shunpikes' that parallel toll roads to be tagged as trunk. See US 30 and I 70 around Bedford and Everett, PA, US 13 and DE 1 through Delaware, and US 50 in Fairfax County and Arlington, VA. Often times, these routes will see just as much, if not more traffic than the toll road. This section of Route 168 Business in particular sees ~1000 more daily traffic than mainline 168, according to AADT data.
Marek-M (2024-10-28 07:50:02+00:00): Cześć, trawników nie nazywamy tak jak rondo. Wystarczająca jest nazwa na drogach ronda.
Fabe56 (2025-03-06 13:08:59+00:00): Bonjour,
Concernant la cascade du Dard https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12292683790
N'est-ce pas un double de https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/420433960/history/3 ajouté via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58479210#map=19/45.627783/6.508777 ?
sly (2025-03-06 13:42:14+00:00): Salut Fabe56,

Bonne question, a l'endroit ou j'ai rentré une cascade, à coté d'une sorte de "point de vue" pour la voir, il y a bien une cascade, ou plutôt une série de petites cascades et les coordonnées me semblent bonnes relevées au GPS, par contre, il n'y avait pas de nom sur un panneau, alors, est-ce que la cascade ayant comme nom "cascade du Dard" est plus bas sur le nant du Dard ? Je ne peux pas le dire avec certitutde, je vois que c'est toi qui a renseigné celle plus bas, est-ce qu'il y avait un panneau pour confirmer son nom ?
En attendant confirmation, je propose d'enlever le nom de celle que j'ai vue pour un jour confirmer plus tard si c'est un réseau de cascades qui s'appel "les cascades du Dard" ou s'il y en a qu'une nommée
Fabe56 (2025-04-01 15:48:20+00:00): Salut, désolé pour le délai. Pour ma part j'ai « seulement » associé l'item Wikidata avec le nœud 420433960. J'ai opté pour celui-ci seulement en raison de son ancienneté ;) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/420433960/history/3
Bref mystère, mystère !
Fabe56 (2025-04-01 16:20:11+00:00): PTI je viens de trouver cela sur la base Sandre, la prise juste en amont https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1019487345/history/2 C'est bien possible que cette succession de chute porte le nême nom ;)
sly (2025-04-01 20:14:53+00:00): yo, pour info, j'y suis passé sur ce "chemin du dard", c'est une passerelle en métal qui passe sur le ruisseau "le dard" qui permet de contrôler la déviation vers un canal sous-terrain. Les cascades commencent un peu plus bas.

Je propose de ne rien changer, le prochain (ou moi si j'y retourne avec la motiv) qui connait mieux le coin nous listera les cascades
Tjuro (2024-10-28 05:34:32+00:00): Beste Erwin Kooi,

Je geeft hier aan dat deze kruisingen geen markeringen hebben.

Op de luchtfoto is te zien dat hier blokmarkeringen zijn aangebracht. Dat word gemapped met crossing:markings=dots.

Zou je kunnen toelichten hoe dit komt?

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tjuro
whammo (2024-10-28 00:45:51+00:00): Hi Kevin, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Can you describe what you were trying to do here?
arichnad (2025-01-06 03:11:40+00:00): I reverted this, thanks!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161042840
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-10-28 22:58:00+00:00): reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158477014
cuzi (2024-10-29 13:41:20+00:00): GeoportalBW ist nicht als Quelle erlaubt. 
Außerdem stimmt die Bezeichnung nicht mit den Straßenschildern und Leitpfosten vor Ort überein, vor Ort steht überall nur B 292 ohne a.
Bamba Saladu (2024-10-29 19:04:12+00:00): Dann werde ich wohl alles wieder rückgängig machen müssen. Seufz!
Wieso ist GeoportalBW nicht erlaubt?
cuzi (2024-10-29 20:09:57+00:00): Es gibt einen Thread im Forum dazu: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/maps4bw-und-basemap-de/6762/

basemap.de ist die Standardkarte im Geoportal.
Soweit ich mich erinnere, ist das Problem, dass die Lizenz von basemap.de eine Namensnennung in abgeleiteten Werken erfordert. Die Lizenz von OSM, unter der die Daten dann weiterverbreitet werden, fordert aber keine Namensnennung mehr.

Es hat jemand beim zuständigen Landesamt in BW nach einer Ausnahmeregelung für OSM gefragt, aber es gibt noch keine positive Rückmeldung.
mini-me (2024-10-30 01:25:47+00:00): Пробел между номером и буквой не нужен
ghostofc (2024-10-31 21:42:37+00:00): Спасибо, учту!
mweper (2024-10-28 00:37:13+00:00): Relevamiento in situ con OsmAnd, StreetComplete y JOSM de distintos elementos alrededor del recorrido en automóvil por RN1v09, RNA012 y RN34.
bradrh (2024-11-05 18:39:43+00:00): What's your source for the name Crossroads Lane?
Joseph R P (2024-11-05 19:15:10+00:00): That's the name the road already had (partially). The church on the western end also is addressed to Crossroads Lane in records. The church's website shows that it's addressed to CR 128, so 'Crossroads Lane' could also be an alternative or historic name.
hoserab (2024-10-28 00:45:52+00:00): I should be clear: I replaced the "service:vehicle:a/c_recharge=yes" tag with "service:vehicle:air_conditioning=yes" so that there's no confusion about this fixme note again.
grzegorzmilosz (2024-10-28 19:43:55+00:00): Nie dość że krzywo to jeszcze nie poprawnie bo drogi polne nie są polem uprawnym. A po za tym po co takie wielkie bloki pól uprawnych drogi powinny dzielić pola uprawne na mniejsze fragmenty.
Marek-M (2024-10-28 20:14:05+00:00): @maro21 - co było powodem wycofania edycji? Może jakieś szczegóły były do poprawy ale chyba cofnięcie całego changesetu było na wyrost?
SomeoneElse (2024-11-17 20:55:08+00:00): @maro21 - please do reply to the questions that you have been asked here.
SomeoneElse (2024-11-17 20:55:32+00:00): @maro21 - proszę odpowiedz na pytania, które Ci tutaj zadano.
maro21 (2024-11-27 00:03:33+00:00): grzegorzmilosz: Drogi polne poprawiłem. Co znaczy zdanie "drogi polne nie są polem uprawnym"? No nie są, wiadomo.
Drogi mogą, ale nie muszą dzielić pól uprawnych. Droga polna, jak sama nazwa wskazuje, jest na polu. Co innego jezdnia.

MarekM: Bo 90% zestawu było błędne. Tak, trochę na wyrost, ale geometria dróg, którą przez przypadek też wycofałem, już poprawiłem.
nevw (2024-10-28 03:35:19+00:00): Hi
See bridge:name option on the wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge
Often the road name is continued across the bridge with name=* and the named bridge carries the tag bridge:name
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:51:07+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165095601
wolfbert (2026-03-01 11:32:59+00:00): Hallo, haben die Örtlichkeiten wirklich den Namen "unknown"? Besser ev. fixme=name o.ä. 

Für komplette Liste siehe 

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?source=12856&item=3030&class=1398494170
-=|MisterY|=- (2026-03-01 18:59:57+00:00): fixed, thanks!
Alliegaytor (2024-10-31 04:46:06+00:00): Hi Evie, 

Thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap :)

Just letting you know that `amenity=parking_space` is typically used to map a single parking spot rather than the entire parking lot / area. `amenity=parking` is probably more what you're after for the parking you've added!

I've changed these areas to be `amenity=parking` rather than `amenity=parking_space`

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1328693612
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1328693610

Here's the wiki entries for those tags if you would like more information about mapping parking.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking%20space

Also, the description tag is usually more for describing something potentially useful for someone using the map rather than describing what you've added or changed. You don't need to add "added a parking lot" to the description of the parking lots, the changeset comment is probably the place you should write that.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description

Hope this information is helpful, and have fun mapping!
JJIglesias (2024-10-28 03:34:28+00:00): Bonito trabajo, gracias
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-10-29 11:47:11+00:00): Please read the official wiki before doing edits on the openstreetmap data. Also, please keep the street names on the crossings as it is the way we do it in Quebec/Montreal. Thanks!
发光的电子管 (2024-10-29 18:27:31+00:00): 阖闾城到城西回民村道路为双向共四机动车道，未快速化现存里程碑为S230，我认为不应该标记为highway=trunk以及ref=G635。
5m4u9 (2024-10-29 04:34:23+00:00): hola, los edificios debes dibujarlos sobre el contorno del edificio real, no sobre el terreno. Si no es inventarse cosas que no hay.

Realmente es muy tedioso, pero es lo mejor.
MarcoR (2024-10-29 15:10:39+00:00): In genere su OpenStreetMap non si aggiunge il separatore delle migliaia ai valori numerici ;)
SimonPNZ (2025-03-06 09:34:09+00:00): Sneaky Snacky donuts is definitely still here in March 2025, I walked past it today, and have purchased from there within the last month.
They are however closed at least on Mondays and when closed the window blinds are fully closed, which may give the visual impression of permanent closure. I'll ask what their days / hours are next time I visit.
ralley (2025-03-07 05:37:18+00:00): Thanks, reverted
mcliquid (2024-10-29 06:44:35+00:00): Reverted because of SPAM link changeset - user reported

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158483638
kaleidoscopica (2026-03-18 17:14:28+00:00): I don't think things like "Tributary H-2.2" are names - they're internal identifiers (possibly refs), but definitely not commonly known or used by the average person to refer to these waterways, as the `name` tag would suggest. For now, I'm changing name to note, but open to a better way to store this information.
CraigPe (2026-03-30 11:48:19+00:00): Thanks for leaving a comment.  I think just “Squabble Creek Tributary”, for example,  would be good if you don’t like the “H 2.2” unique/technical names. I’ll work on adding the tributary names back in that manner.
kaleidoscopica (2026-03-31 09:57:07+00:00): I’m not sure that’s right either. I think they just don’t have names. “Squabble Creek Tributary” is a description, but not really a name.
CraigPe (2026-03-31 13:02:42+00:00): OK, sure, I guess I'm with you there.  "Squabble Creek Tributary" is a description.  But I don't know why you say they don't have names.  "Squabble Creek Tributary E", "Buffalo Creek Tributary 3", etc. are the names.  Sure, their probably not known to every man on the street, but I doubt the common man would know even the names of the main, non-tributary, streams.  I live next to one of these and I just had to look up the name on the map because I didn't know it (Buffalo Creek).  So, these names, even those of the main, non-tributary streams, are not commonly used or known by the average person, but I would still map them.  The same goes for the Tributaries.  They have names even if the common person (like me) doesn't know them.  I know that if I want the name I can consult a detailed map, which is what I did to obtain these names.  In my opinion OSM should have this detail, i.e. the names of tributaries.
kaleidoscopica (2026-03-31 15:53:58+00:00): Hm. I think this is similar to the "names vs refs" debate for roads, where it seems to be generally accepted that refs are not names; see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/names-are-not-refs-vs-some-names-are-based-on-refs/109995 for example.

One of the principles of OSM is that names should be *human-readable*, which is why refs exist for number-based ID schemas. Things like "Tributary H-2.2" are not human-readable, which is why I suggest they are closer to refs.

If you are in the US Slack, you could  raise this question on the #water channel, or you could post it to https://community.openstreetmap.org/ to gauge consensus.
CraigPe (2026-03-31 22:56:55+00:00): I have removed the name=* tag from all tributaries in Rockwall County.  Changeset 180695275.
Baloo Uriza (2025-09-09 22:00:47+00:00): I lived there.  These two roads definitely don't exist as such, they're just pullthrough parking spaces.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171708223
sarya_Lyft (2025-09-10 11:44:09+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza,

My name is Surander, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you very much for sharing your local insights and for removing our edits.

Best regards, Surander
Stalker61 (2024-10-28 06:45:18+00:00): Тег tracktype=* применяется в связке с тегом track=*
т.е. для дорог предназначенных для движения сельхоз (спец) техники.
mavl (2025-03-07 15:08:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].
mavl (2025-03-07 15:07:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163331046 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - To much access=no -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161883386].