piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2023-09-18 03:57:03+00:00): Hello.
When adding names to tags, they should not be abbreviated. In this case "NYPD" should be "New York Police Department". If you do want to specify the shortened name then you should use operator:short= tag.
You can read more about this at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(don't_do_it)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141279895
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:26:28+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353203
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:26:17+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698227
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:26:18+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698227
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:26:19+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698227
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:26:29+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353203
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 01:54:25+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153352866
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:26:20+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698227
fortera_au (2024-01-20 07:57:39+00:00): Hi, can you please confirm your source for this and other edits, I believe this has possibly been taken from a source we cannot use.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:39:42+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698405
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:26:30+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353203
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:39:43+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698405
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:39:44+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698405
Patrickov (2023-09-15 02:38:23+00:00): You broke KMB 8A routing again!
Patrickov (2023-09-15 04:13:10+00:00): Fixed KMB 8A at changeset 141283404
DressyPear4 (2023-09-15 01:39:09+00:00): Adicione apenas o que existe
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141280422
Frans S (2023-09-16 09:25:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please focus on mapping buildings and roads which connects houses, settlements and villages. Tracks leading to farmland are not important.
Best regards and keep mapping
TrainontheTrail (2025-03-24 19:18:30+00:00): 1203368427 is not an approved or recognized trail by the state or city and the publishing of this path instead of the correct trail is leading to natural resource damage on public land. part of this path is correct as it is part of the VAST corridor 407 F, but the upper portion is not an approved trail
joel56dt (2023-09-15 16:29:37+00:00): Nice work! Thank you for adding these.

A tip: once you have drawn a building, you can select it and press the Q key to 'square up' any angles that are close to 90 degrees. It cleans up how the buildings look since most will have 90 degree corners.
DressyPear4 (2023-09-15 01:52:19+00:00): Se a via já existe no local, pra que colocar outra por cima?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141280946
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-29 06:08:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2351683324/history - should we remove also other tags?

Was it credible note or some unverified anonymous one?
pnorman (2023-09-15 09:37:45+00:00): Hello, you've removed more specific information from the website in favour of the generic page for the chain. This is generally not a good idea.

If this is a bot edit, can you point to the bot documentation on the OSM wiki and consultation with the local community?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:39:45+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698405
MxxCon (2023-09-18 04:43:09+00:00): Satellite imagery shows this is traffic lights intersection so this tag wasn't wrong.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141281988
joel56dt (2023-09-15 16:32:04+00:00): Cool OSM/wiki tool! I will be checking this out in more detail.
Fleezing (2023-09-15 18:01:08+00:00): It's still beta, but it already looks really useful. Just use it in small batches—I did a bunch then when it came time to save, it errored out and I lost it all when I had to log in again. ☹
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:39:46+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698405
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 02:26:31+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353203
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:39:47+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698405
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:41:34+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698431
Binayak-NRCS_Dang (2023-09-27 04:49:22+00:00): Rakshi Khana aau
Niruta Neeupane (2023-12-06 14:48:08+00:00): Hello, please don't comment anything that is irrelevant to the task.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-10-24 03:41:35+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173698431
fortera_au (2024-01-20 07:57:36+00:00): Hi, can you please confirm your source for this and other edits, I believe this has possibly been taken from a source we cannot use.
fortera_au (2024-01-20 07:57:38+00:00): Hi, can you please confirm your source for this and other edits, I believe this has possibly been taken from a source we cannot use.
pythin (2023-09-15 03:16:55+00:00): Source is https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/
Āniwaniwa (2023-09-15 05:19:04+00:00): Exists but does not work
user_5359 (2023-09-15 06:04:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys).
user_5359 (2023-09-15 06:28:36+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1207920491/history. What is the mean of the foreign tags
BUILDING	YES
X_1_6_How_	Residential
addr_full	Iliheu
building_c	good
building_l	1
building_m	wood
building_s	permanent
capacity_p	<50
evacuation	no
roof_mater	thatch
Please do not abbreviate keys and use the correct notation (building:levels instead of building_levels)!
Bendita Moreira (2024-02-27 10:20:14+00:00): Thanks for remained I'll fixed.
Baloo Uriza (2023-09-15 14:51:46+00:00): Landuse should be congruent with actual landuse.  These landuse=residential polygons also include spaces that are landuse=highway
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141283360
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:59:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714070, 143714075 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines users nach selbstlöschung
CorruptComputer (2023-09-16 19:09:25+00:00): Hi there, welcome to OpenStreetMap! In the future could you please split your edits up into smaller geographic areas? This edit spans across an entire ocean...
arjunaraoc (2024-01-06 02:14:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Check my update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145942610
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141284426
Marek-M (2023-09-15 10:53:05+00:00): Cześć, Twoja edycja nie jest prawidłowa i nadaje się do wycofania. Trudno ocenić, co chciałeś uzyskać tą edycją, szczególnie nowo dodane obiekty są niezgodne z zasadami:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207938433
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207938434
FajrAl (2023-09-21 05:24:32+00:00): Mohon jika lokasinya sangat berjauhan untuk menyimpan/save satu per satu dalm lokasi yang dekat, untuk memudahkan penglihatan dalam Riwayat. Terima kasih.
gscholz (2023-09-22 08:57:41+00:00): Hi frozenrabi,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways, especially way 1207235923 is affected here:


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-9.00294&lat=30.95524&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141285649

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207235923#map=19/30.95601/-9.00337

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
frozenrabi (2023-09-25 10:53:41+00:00): Hi Guido,
This issue is resolved now. Thanks for the reminder.
zstadler (2023-11-25 15:49:27+00:00): הי חיליק

שוב תודה על העדכונים שאתה מכניס למפה

בעריכה זו נמחק קטע דרך שהיה שיך לשביל עם סימון שבילים אדום.
נדמה לי שגם בהמשך השביל האדום דרומה נעשה מיפוי מחדש שלא שמר על צבע השביל ועל השתייכותו למסלול של שביל מסומן.

תוכל להרחיב על מצב הסימון באדום של השביל הזה?

תודה
זאב
חיליק אגמון (2023-11-27 07:26:05+00:00): שלום זאב
קיבוץ הזורע משנה לחלוטין את הקטע הזה של הכביש בין המושבה יוקנעם לקיבוץ, מדובר בשינוי משמעותי.
כרגע הקטע שהורדתי מהמפה לא קיים בשטח עקב העבודות, כל האזור הזה שצמוד לקיבוץ סגור ואין אפשרות מעבר. אני עוקב אחרי ההתקדמות ברגע שיושלם ו/או יפתח אני אחזיר את המסלול החדש בהתאם לשינוי.
zstadler (2023-11-27 11:11:18+00:00): הי חיליק,

נמתין בסבלנות לסיום העבודות.

כשזה יקרה, בנוסף לתיוג הדרכים עם
colour
ושאר התגיות, יהיה צריך לסדר את היחסים
(relations)
שמאגדים את הקטעים ששיכים לסימון בצבע נתון, כפי שמתואר בדף על ישראל
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Trail_relations

אם אתה פחות מכיר את זה, אשמח להסביר, או לעשות את העדכון בעצמי

עדכן אותי שכזה יהיה רלוונטי
חיליק אגמון (2023-11-29 05:01:58+00:00): בוקר טוב זאב
אני מגיע לתא שטח זה לעיתים תכופות, ברגע שהצירים הרלוונטים יפתחו אני אעדכן ב- OSM וכמובן אעדכן גם אותך.
user_5359 (2023-09-15 06:03:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys).
rab (2023-09-15 11:07:57+00:00): these are no residential roads!
LakeMatano (2023-09-19 06:48:08+00:00): Thank you for your message. I agree https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207944354 is best classified as path as their are no houses along it, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1134779398 and the previous way off of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11192483441 were providing road access to homes, therefore residential seemed appropriate, similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215473446.
danieldegroot2 (2023-09-15 21:34:06+00:00): Hey DharmaBum,

Please refrain from tagging roads with highway=tertiary or above, especially if you are unsure if they lead anywhere at all. See the guidelines
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Morocco#How_tagging_the_routes/ways?
If you are unsure of the classification, use minor road highway=unclassified, or alternatively leave it 'unknown' highway=road
Validators will try to tag it properly.

Regards,

Daniel
dp7 (2023-09-15 09:05:23+00:00): Hi, thanks for helping me, I was struggling with this relation ! Please help me understand the problem better, so I try to avoid it next time. Thank you
SekeRob (2023-09-15 09:46:28+00:00): ID Editor is actually very good at breaking multipolygon relations and not telling it is as it does not download the whole of the relations worked on.

I'd recommend you try out JOSM combined with the RelToolbox (Relation Validation plugin). It allows easy downloading of complete relations and will give a detail validation error/warning list of items needing fixing prior to saving.  Quite a few roles were missing here as were many sections of inner area not made member. Also whole multipolygons were made inner to the forest. Can't do that, the outlines of the MP/SP needs selecting and made inner. If an MP is not properly closed or self intersecting it will tell you and where in the Validator pane.

cheers
ivanbranco (2023-09-15 15:57:36+00:00): Hi Pradeepa,

what's this line? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207952628

can it be deleted?
DD1GJ (2023-09-16 00:12:21+00:00): Hallo Droeni,

willkommen bei OSM. Du hattest die temporäre Wegstrecke für den Delftlauf in den OSM-Rohdaten wild über bereits vorhandene Wege gemalt, wodurch, wie oben ersichtlich, zahlreiche Warnungen ausgelöst wurden. Daher habe ich das wieder rückgängig gemacht.

Wenn Du eine eigene Karte der Wegstrecke brauchst, dann verwende dafür bitte https://umap.openstreetmap.de/

Weitere Informationen zu OSM findest Du z.B. unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
user_3022894 (2023-09-23 15:51:56+00:00): Hallo Henry572,

die Rollstuhlgerechtigkeit der Toilette an der Moorenstraße in allen Ehren, aber "wheelchair=designated" würde ich trotzdem nicht setzen.
wheelchair=designated bedeutet ja "speziell für Rollstuhlfahrer vorgesehen, explizit für Rollstuhlfahrer".
"Rollstuhlgerecht" heißt gemeinhin eher wheelchair=yes.
Das WC an der Moorenstraße können ja alle benutzen, nicht nur Leute im Rollstuhl.
Viele Grüße
Lukas
Henry572 (2023-09-23 21:08:32+00:00): Hallo Lukas,
Du hast vollkommen Recht, da habe ich das Wiki nicht genau gelesen. Und wow, ich wusste gar nicht, wie viele Tags es für öffentliche Toiletten gibt. Werde ich bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11192612849 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2938080801 auch ergänzen, sobald die fertig sind ;-)
Gruß, Hendrik
user_3022894 (2023-09-29 17:57:32+00:00): Hallo Hendrik,

alles klar, und gerne, kein Problem! :-)

Ja das wäre natürlich super, wenn du die ergänzt. Die neuen Toiletten von Hering sind wirklich "schön" und modern geworden.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
Richard (2023-10-22 13:20:08+00:00): St Davids has been tagged as a city in OSM for 15+ years. It is of course possible you are uniquely clever and have found something that thousands of OSM editors in the UK have hitherto missed! But even then you should aim to work with the community consensus rather than overruling it. I'm reverting it and would suggest you discuss on the talk-gb@ mailing list first if you want to make major changes like this.
eggie (2023-09-15 09:37:35+00:00): Dag Op t Rad... In het begin wordt gescreend. Uiteraard om te helpen.
De highway=crossing bij de Oude Morsweg heb ik verwijderd.
crossing heeft niet ditrect met kruispunt te maken.
Het is een oversteekplaats die aangegeven staat op het wegdek dmv  strepen of een vluchtheuvel.
MVG
eggie
Frans S (2023-10-26 12:34:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
When you map a water/highway crossing, please add the crossing method. fi. ford, bridge etc.
And, don't use the tag footway on paths in rural areas.  Just highway=path.
Best regards
Tomas_J (2023-09-27 20:19:50+00:00): Hi, you did some mistake here - a building hundereds kilometres long has been created. The changes have been reverted already.
Tomas_J
Rom1 (2023-09-15 09:17:14+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé votre modification. S'il vous plait, il est inutile d'ajouter addr:street quand existe une relation de type associatedStreet. Aussi, 2 adresses séparées par un point virgule sur un même noeud est tout à fait correct et représentatif de la réalité. Merci de tenir compte de ces observations. Bonne continuation.
GrandNancyLabNumNT (2023-09-15 13:44:08+00:00): Bonjour,

Dans ce cas précis 2 entrées sont présentes avec 2 numéros distincts.
Je vous propose d'échanger sur le sujet car nos positionnement d'incident sont erronés
Cordialement
Nicolas THOMAS - nicolas.thomas@grandnancy.eu
pantufla (2023-11-04 14:07:47+00:00): Los cartelones, no los nodos XD
user_5359 (2023-09-17 06:24:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use building=residential instead of BUILDING=HOME. For details see https://wiki.osm.org.
user_5359 (2023-09-17 06:59:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please see the new version of your entry. Questiion: Did you mean a place for soccer (or other sports) or a real playground for childs (see https://wiki.osm.org)?
segubi (2024-10-03 22:28:21+00:00): Hallo, ich sehe es jetzt erst, wo ich mal wieder hier die Routen überprüfe: Mit diesem Changeset hast Du (durch die Änderung der Kreuzungsgeometrie bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1320485379 ) 7 Routenrelationen unterbrochen. Die müßten bei solchen Änderungen bitte auch immer mit überprüft und angepaßt werden... Meiner Meinung nach geht einem das mit JOSM nicht so leicht durch die Lappen wie mit iD, vielleicht hilft das.
Nichts für ungut, Grüße,
Sebastian
lmagreault (2023-12-14 14:23:23+00:00): Merci pour votre première contribution. Vous pouvez supprimer le nom "Aires de jeux" qui est simplement descriptif, leisure=playground suffit à décrire l'objet, name ne s'utilise que si l'objet porte un nom en propre, visible sur le terrain (exemple : "Aire de la voie des Salines").
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141289319
sirach (2024-11-12 13:34:45+00:00): Hallo. Ich habe mir erlaubt, das changeset zu reverten. Es gibt an dieser Stell zwei Furten, eine davon hat Steine. Eine der Regeln bei OSM lautet, dass wir nicht für den Renderer (also in dem Fall nicht für Komoot) mappen, sondern umgekehrt die Renderer (oder die Routing-Engine von Komoot) richtig mit den Daten umgehen müssen. Wenn Komoot hier keine Warnung anzeigt, dass eine Furt auf dem Weg ist, ist das deren Problem. Andere Router gehen wieder ganz anders damit um und wir können die Kartendaten nicht für jeden Router individuell anpassen.
user_5359 (2023-09-15 19:22:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice we use for every type of road, street, foot way the key highway. For documentation please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org
Frans S (2023-09-16 10:23:57+00:00): HEllo. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag traces of a road  just leading to nothing as an unclassified road. Use track 
Best regards
ivanbranco (2024-04-24 10:23:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207965520

Ciao Francesco,
qua hai inserito due specie differenti in due tag differenti. Volevi indicare che nel bosco sono presenti entrambe o é un errore?
Danysan95 (2026-01-05 13:55:32+00:00): In assenza di risposta possiamo rimuovere wikidata=* e wikipedia=* e usare species:wikidata=Q161415;Q218155 ?
ivanbranco (2026-01-05 14:28:06+00:00): nel dubbio si può anche sostituire entrambi con genus=Quercus + genus:wikidata=Q12004
Danysan95 (2026-01-18 09:39:50+00:00): Fatto in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177365299
Rom1 (2023-09-15 09:32:04+00:00): Bonjour, quelle est l'utilité de l'ajout du tag "bicycle=yes" sur une voie de service ? Par défaut, s'il n'y a pas d'interdiction spécifique, tous les modes de déplacements sont autorisés. Merci
anne_geovelo (2023-09-15 10:43:20+00:00): Bonjour, Effectivement en soi l'ajout du bicycle=yes n'est pas nécessaire mais l'accès de certaines voies de service peuvent être problématiques quand il s'agit par exemple de zones d'activités avec des engins ou autre. C'est pour cela que par défaut le passage des vélos n'est pas à valoriser. Le fait de mettre un bicycle=yes sur la voie permet de confimer que le passage des vélos est possible.
GinaroZ (2023-11-18 00:06:07+00:00): Not sure why you added leisure=track - this tagging is not for motorsports, therefore I've removed it.
user_5359 (2023-09-15 19:30:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM (mostly foreign keys). Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org.
user_5359 (2023-09-17 06:05:00+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1207969923. What is the mean of the tag 7 = yes?
98Ujm (2023-09-18 08:29:16+00:00): Thanks for your vigilance, this was a typo!
A-U-X (2023-10-05 08:07:29+00:00): There is no Nikora supermaket here, it's better to delete it, I live in this city
Tomas_J (2023-09-27 20:16:38+00:00): Ahoj,
jedna mala pripomienka: adresu na podniku (bare, restauracii) nie je potrebne uvadzat - je uz uvedena na budove na ktorej je podnik umiestneny. Ak by si sa chcel cokolvek opytat, mozes pouzit diskusnu skupinu https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk. Dakujem, ze si vylepsil mapu pridanim tychto dvoch bodov.
S pozdravom
Tomas_J
Frans S (2023-10-07 09:17:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping,
Please use the correct tag when you map highways.
the tag footway is not to be used here.
Please check these wiki's for a better understanding.
Tagging of highways:
 
 African countries:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries
For Marocco
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Morocco#How_tagging_the_routes/ways?
Best regards
arjunaraoc (2024-01-06 02:07:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145942524
Building geometry should not share nodes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141291559
eggie (2023-09-15 09:42:26+00:00): Dag Erik ,
waterway=ditch hoort op een lijn element.

Maar we gebruiken voor vallen natural=water
water=ditch  Dan zul je water zien op een vlak.
Ik pas even wat aan.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-09-15 09:51:03+00:00): typo  vallen?   vlakken
Erik Terpstra (2023-09-17 09:52:50+00:00): Dank voor de uitleg!
Pikse (2023-10-22 14:11:21+00:00): Hi. Please avoid naming steets based on names of adjacent streets. Street segments like way/318939430 or way/229671450 are unnamed, they are respectively *not* part of Sõpruse pst and Juhan Sütiste tee. E.g. see the correct extent of the latter street here: https://xgis.maaamet.ee/adsavalik/LP00018152
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-10-22 16:38:54+00:00): Good catch, I've reverted the changeset. Not all questions in StreetComplete can and should be answered, but I think in this case there is a way to choose option that the street has no name.
to_urcite_ty_kokos (2023-10-22 16:58:09+00:00): When I was walking through the streets like way/229671450, there was a sign with the name of the street, so I expected that this would be the name of that street also. Can I somehow easily recognize, that this is wrong? Thanks and sorry.

https://www.google.com/maps/@59.3965887,24.6801098,3a,37.5y,287.46h,94.23t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1spWQrl2-dQQ383GuTfWKnJQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?entry=ttu
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-10-22 17:13:09+00:00): This is a building address. Street names are on separate signs, usually near junctions, and don't include house numbers.
For bigger streets it's usually hard to find them, only on turning directions https://www.google.com/maps/@59.400727,24.6944814,3a,23.1y,50.16h,122.51t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sQ_k_fy1Iy3i963LqFcU7WA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DQ_k_fy1Iy3i963LqFcU7WA%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D302.63907%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

Smaller streets have them more often, but also not always https://www.google.com/maps/@59.4169814,24.7155132,3a,15y,95.07h,81.47t/data=!3m10!1e1!3m8!1sVxB28bjzY8UquLmrY6sBtA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DVxB28bjzY8UquLmrY6sBtA%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D320.88705%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656!9m2!1b1!2i29?entry=ttu
to_urcite_ty_kokos (2023-10-22 17:14:46+00:00): Oh, I see. Thank you for clarification.
bxl-forever (2023-09-15 10:36:03+00:00): Please never manually add postcodes and city names on addresses in Brussels.
Bear-in-a-box (2023-09-15 11:00:50+00:00): Ok, but why?