piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
vasony (2023-01-05 08:44:28+00:00): Ennek az alaptérképnek nem tudom mi a licence, de kétlem hogy át lehetne venni adatokat belőle osm-re.

Az elsődleges forrás a helyszín. Itt most pont egyezik az alaptérkép az utcatáblákkal, de ha megnézed a földhivatali adatokat, akkor ott az eredeti nevek vannak. A Mátyás királynál az összes házon szinte Mátyás király út van, ezért is volt útnak jelölve, de most akkor módosítottam a házakat is, mert az utcatáblák ilyenek.

Ha van még ilyen utca amit át akarsz nevezni, akkor egyeztessünk, mert szinte az összes utcát végigjártam és vannak olyanok is ahol nem egységesek a táblák, pl. Bartók, tehát általában oka van miért az a neve ahogy most van a térképen.
Map-Peter (2023-01-04 23:58:21+00:00): Hallo Silvio,
 
willkommen bei OSM! :-)
 
Bitte zukünftig beachten:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name
 
Habe ich hier gerade korrigiert.
 
Gruß Peter
eggie (2023-01-04 21:49:23+00:00): Dag pepper....  
Ons motto is map what's on the ground.

Dus alles kan worden ingetekend  ook al lijkt het van geen belang voor iedereen.
Denk aan hulpdiensten. De Brandweer hier rijdt bv met een app die op OSM is gebaseerd.
Dan kunnen juist dit soort wegen van levensbelang zijn. 
Het eerste deel tot de woning zou je als highway=track tracktype=grade2 kunnen intekeken.. De rest dan als highway = path als het smaller is.

MVG
eggie
pepperop2 (2023-01-05 16:53:54+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Ik zal binnenkort toch weer een poging doen om het weggetje in te tekenen. Jij hebt een goede reden aangegeven om opnieuw even er aan te gaan zitten om op de juiste wijze ook dit element op te nemen binnen OSM.
vg
Diógenes de Sinope (2023-01-05 00:50:11+00:00): Hi Ney,

considering that the format of some of the intersections in 'Cidade do Kilamba' was changed in this changeset, the consideration of adding 'turn restrictions' to nodes so as to prevent routing services from giving directions that are not permitted on the ground should be made

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction#iD

nodes can be conjoined if turn restrictions are applied, there is no need to keep them apart

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-8.99857/13.28971
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-10 23:39:20+00:00): Du skal opdele Drewsensvej så kun den rigtige del kommer med i turn relationen.
antonr (2023-01-11 18:39:50+00:00): Parallel diskussion i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130724803
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-12 00:31:31+00:00): Nu har jeg erstattet den med et stykke ensrettet. Det forhindrer også at man kan lave et U-turn fra på Drewsensvej fra service vejen.
Dodko (2023-01-05 07:36:40+00:00): building=house používajte pre dvojdom a radovú zástavbu
building=detached je pre samostatný rodinný dom

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:building%3Ddetached
SKevo (2023-01-05 09:39:36+00:00): Ah ďakujem, ospravedlňujem sa. Som tu nový a v aplikácií ktorú používam (StreetComplete; https://streetcomplete.app/) to v sk preklade nebolo jednoznačné
Dodko (2023-01-05 10:15:47+00:00): Každý nejako začínal tak sa postupne naučíte. Ak vás to bude baviť prejdete na webový editor iD a časom na aplikáciu JOSM editor.
silversurfer83 (2023-01-05 16:28:47+00:00): Moin Volker,
Du hast ein recht großes Stück railway gelöscht. Daher möchte ich dich fragen, ob dir die folgende Funktion bekannt ist:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Ggf. hätte die gelöschte Linie auch auf "razed" statt "abandoned" gesetzt werden können. 
Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130883248
volker-d (2023-01-05 18:28:11+00:00): Hallo Silversurfer,

ich danke dir für deinen freundlichen Hinweis! Die von dir genannten Funktionen kenne ich und habe sie auch bereits mehrfach genutzt. Das ca. 1 km lange Stück habe ich gelöscht, weil der User bahntech den Verlauf der ca. 1980 abgebauten Bahn hier nicht richtig erfasst und zum Ende hin sehr lieblos gezeichnet hat. U.a. enthielt dieser Abschnitt ein kurzes Stück demnach auf kurzem Weg eine über 10 m hohe steile Wand einer Halde hätte überwunden werden musste. Ich trage den richtigen Verlauf in dieser Ecke und im Weiteren in den nächsten Wochen nach. Bis da hin beschäftige ich mich mit den ehemaligen Bahnanlagen in und um die ehemalige Augsut-Bebel-Hütte in Helbra.

Viele Grüße

Volker
volker-d (2023-01-05 18:33:36+00:00): Ach ja: Und ein großen Teil der gelöschten Punkte habe ich in der richtigen Lage neu gezeichnet, weil es einfacher war als diese zu verschieben.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Aufmerksamkeit!
silversurfer83 (2023-01-05 21:47:50+00:00): Ok. Denke, dann wird das schon passen :)
Alles Gute
Gazer75 (2023-05-07 07:34:33+00:00): Why did you change the towers to poles? That is not accurate for that high voltage level no matter the design. Those are towers. Poles are for distribution lines mostly.
Gazer75 (2023-05-07 07:48:01+00:00): Looks like you've just selected all nodes in the line and tagged it as a power=pole completely disregarding my detailed mapping. Like the terminal at the transition station. Please don't do this and ruin other peoples work. Thank you.
Diógenes de Sinope (2023-01-05 00:31:37+00:00): Hi Ney, 

adding a way that swerves 90 degrees into the adjacent perpendicular lane is superfluous at an intersection if there is no traffic island separating the two, the intersecting ways of the intersection already represents what a curved 90 degree lane would

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-8.99103/13.25184

speaking from experience, do not be surprised if your edits in this changeset get altered
archpdx (2023-01-05 06:07:52+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for updating this road name. Please note however that we don't abbreviate road names in OSM (see https://wiki.osm.org/abbreviation). In this case, it should be unabbreviated to 'Southwest Lockwood Court'.
B D Walker (2023-01-05 07:07:54+00:00): Thank you for that clarification.
gscholz (2023-01-05 06:53:08+00:00): Hi ferani,
thanks for fixing the unconnected way 1127353102 here. Regarding your contributions I found no comments describing your activities:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ferani/history#map=13/39.8897/32.7391

May be you like to educate yourself about his topic:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Guido
Mahdi Nameghi (2023-01-07 05:08:09+00:00): سلام
چرا از تایپ سرویس برای این معابر استفاده میکنید؟ 
این معابر چه ارتباطی با این تایپ دارند؟
HellMap (2023-01-05 11:32:19+00:00): Hi!

You tagged a lot of areas here as leisure=garden. These do not look like gardens on the aerial imagery. What was your intention to tag here?

Thanks.
HellMap (2023-01-15 21:31:24+00:00): I changed them to residential landuse.
NorthCrab (2023-01-07 07:03:21+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!
Zweryfikowałem twoje zmiany.

Ten dostęp jest jakiś dziwny:
- na pieszo mogę wejść bez problemu
- samochodem nie wjadę
- rowerem wjadę tylko jeśli dojeżdżam do punktu
- koniem nie wjadę

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/715093528

Podejrzewam że to błąd, jeśli to działka prywatna to powinien być uważam tylko access=private.

Jeśli nie jest to błąd to proszę o wysłanie jakiegoś zdjęcia znaków zakazu które tam się znajdują jako dowód :P

Pozdrawiam!
Dodko (2023-01-05 07:41:07+00:00): addr:unit nepoužívame na Slovensku
adresa je už vyplnená na budove https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760115158 preto sa nedáva duplicitne aj do bodu/reštaurácie.
Telefónne číslo vždy dávajte v medzinárodnom tvare +421 948...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
ovruni (2023-01-05 00:13:13+00:00): Hola, he recuperado el nodo ya que las etiquetas son diferentes a la del nodo que representa a los grados de primaria y secundaria del colegio.
Saludos
eggie (2024-09-27 14:32:24+00:00): Hoi Martin..  In de zuidoosthoek van Maassluis zijn in 2024 veel G7 borden verwijderd en paden opengesteld voor fietsers. Dit even ter info. 
Er is al het e.e.a. aangepast door een lokale mapper. Even geassisteerd.
Checken doe ik met S&P.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bendinko/history#map=11/51.9851/4.3163&layers=N
Groet
eggie
emvee (2024-09-27 21:03:50+00:00): Okay, bedankt, goed om te weten.

Ik kom hier zo eens per jaar, ik zal eens opletten.

Groeten,

Martin.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-05 03:15:57+00:00): Hi Liam. Could you please square your buildings after drawing them by pressing "Q"?
Thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
kechan_tagfix (2023-01-04 23:08:34+00:00): SO SO SORRY!!!!!

I forgot I had not selected a single area!!!
moje_konto (2023-01-04 23:31:12+00:00): Whatever about large area.

But it seems there are fix to do with this edit.

Name=House was removed also from shops, which may be correct name, simple brands like that exist.

And when there was combination of name=house with building=yes, would be good to check if maybe moving it to building=house make sense.
VictorIE (2024-01-29 19:26:37+00:00): Hi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9264408781
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9264408782

Two Homesavers shops together?
DaCor (2024-01-29 19:28:38+00:00): Yeah, one is household and garden type bits, other has mostly food
DaCor (2024-01-29 19:29:06+00:00): No difference in the names or signage so no way to differentiate them
VictorIE (2024-01-29 23:38:19+00:00): description=* or change shop=* for the food one?
adrianojbr (2023-01-11 14:31:07+00:00): Marcelo, evite deixar elementos mapeados em duplicidade no mapa, conforme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#One_feature,_one_OSM_element.

Alguns PoIs que você mapeou como área, já estavam mapeados como ponto (ex. Banco do Brasil). Ponto, na maior parte dos casos, é uma maneira mais simples de mapear PoIs e área é mais completa (às vezes, quando há mais de um PoI no mesmo edifício, esse é mapeado como área e os PoIs como pontos dentro do edifício).

Há a opção de mesclar elementos selecionado ambos segurando o Shift e tecla C (ou botão direito para usar o menu contextual).

Isso é mais útil antes de salvar as alterações, pois o histórico do ponto ficaria registrado em um dos pontos da área. Agora que já foi salvo, os pontos podem ser apagados, atentando se não há informações que podem ser mantidas copiando manualmente para a área.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130886440
Marcelo Godinho (2023-01-11 15:06:14+00:00): Nestes casos, você sugere que eu mescle a Etiqueta existente (mantendo o histórico) com o polígono da edificação que estou desenhando? Pra dar uma breve explicação sobre minhas complementações e alterações no OSM, elas se dão no âmbito de estudos futuros com geometrias tridimensionais. Sendo assim, meu objetivo é além de mapear o footprint dos edifícios, ter também suas relações de altura para extrusão posterior.
adrianojbr (2023-01-11 23:09:40+00:00): É recomendação que faça a mescla entre o ponto existente e a área nova, mas isso antes de salvar.

Para esses casos, podem ser removidos os pontos, pois a área é uma forma mais completa de mapeamento. Apenas alerto para ter a atenção de conferir se as etiquetas do ponto são relevantes para serem acrescentadas na área.
skorasaurus (2023-01-27 20:45:40+00:00): went to go and update it and you already had,  :D thanks!
dns10 (2023-01-28 03:00:12+00:00): 😉 i'm here to pitch in
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-05 00:11:22+00:00): Cleaned up a user's previous edits for the renderer which were incorrect and damaged the map.
hubzee (2023-01-05 17:41:08+00:00): Please submit changesets with smaller areas...
Friendly_Ghost (2023-01-05 17:53:25+00:00): yeah sorry, I missed this one. Luckily it's a tiny changeset so it's easy to review if you feel like doing that.
Kirstukas (2023-01-05 13:33:12+00:00): Labas, ar planuoji šitus landuse daryti I ir II Šilainiuose? Nes kolkas tik jie likę tokie pilki (prieš kelis metus buvau pradėjęs dėti medžius)
PovilasDew (2023-01-08 18:20:38+00:00): Planuoju kad taip. Kuo man patinka, kad galima matyti kur miegamieji rajonai.
V1O79WIYA5 (2023-01-05 01:14:22+00:00): Sure! I'll fix it.
MxxCon (2023-01-11 04:14:54+00:00): Hello.
If we have a fully structured street address tagged, addr:full is rather unnecessary, especially since that's not the official, full address of that library.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130887436
Warin61 (2023-04-17 07:10:28+00:00): Hi,

Fixme are "fixme=" something.. not amenity=fixme... Is this an 'Every Door' issue? 

Anyway .. node 10307752354 shop Bed Bath N Table would be better entered as shop=yes brand=Bed Bath N Table. If you wnat you could get into the shop detail by looking on th eOSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop

I have changed this as above
Glassman (2023-01-07 18:51:33+00:00): It looks like you accidently deleted the building to the right. If so can you add it back? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130888059
Mashin (2023-01-05 07:46:32+00:00): Hi,
can you explain what are you trying to do here? You keep adding and deleting features.
Gazer75 (2023-05-07 07:58:28+00:00): Did they rebuild https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942697064 as dual circuit recently?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:44:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
ezekielf (2023-01-13 21:36:59+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for the improvements you've been adding!  Just a heads up, it looks like in this edit natural=sand was accidentally applied to the whole Cranberry Lake Wild Forest area.  I went ahead and fixed it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131246249
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:44:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:36:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-05 09:15:52+00:00): I will retag it to disused:tourism=alpine_hut - that is also correct and less likely to be misinterpreted by data consumers
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:24:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
lex_bes (2023-01-05 04:03:33+00:00): Ошибка, поворот находится дальше
SIZKY5C1KI (2023-01-05 04:08:07+00:00): Thanks
lonnez (2023-07-03 05:44:18+00:00): It's appreciated to keep information updated, but in this scenario, it'd be better to remove just the names related to the business that doesn't exist. Things like the address are still useful unless the building is torn down entirely. Thanks!
lonnez (2023-07-03 05:44:33+00:00): I'll restore the still relevant information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:47:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:40:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:54:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:28:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:28:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
gscholz (2023-01-06 07:28:50+00:00): Hi Aspatat,
thsi changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=27.78014&lat=-28.86002&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130892041

This kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-01-08 08:22:00+00:00): Hi Aspatat, 
this errors till exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2023-01-09 12:12:41+00:00): Du to your missing response I have reverted this changeset now to fix those issues.
Guido
Diacritic (2023-01-05 07:02:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by 130892918
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130892063
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:32:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:46:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Diacritic (2023-01-05 07:03:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by 130892918
Diacritic (2023-01-05 07:12:54+00:00): Hello.

This is the third time I have contacted you.

Clayton North is not a suburb as defined by official sources: it's not used as the suburb in any addressess, and has not been gazetted as a locality.

The place=suburb tag is not correct. This has been reverted, again, to accurately reflect that Clayton North is a neighbourhood.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130893044
user_5359 (2023-06-14 19:52:35+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1127428523. Is this a street or water? Please notice: We use the key highway for every type of street.
IlBano (2023-01-08 17:34:14+00:00): Ciao Pucciotrex30.
L'uscita della Siena-Firenze corsia sud in direzione SP70 nord è effettivamente chiusa come indicato da questo nodo ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/333180003
orthocircular (2023-01-05 07:54:03+00:00): Hi there! We appreciate you wanting to add your business to OSM, however you can't put your business' location as a PO box inside the UPS store: not only would that make every place with PO boxes a nightmare on the map, but also people would show up to the UPS store thinking they can talk to you.

If you've got a home-based or virtual business where customers aren't able to physically visit you then I'm afraid we can't accept your submission: we're Open Street Map, not Open Business Database, and our primary mission is to curate highly accurate information about where places are and how to physically get to them.

Please let me know your thoughts by commenting here; if there's no satisfactory reply within a few days your submission will be removed.