piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jakka (2024-02-13 15:45:34+00:00): oplossing: waar de paaltjes staan een node vastmaken aan de weg met code barrier=bollard foot=yes bicycle=yes indien geen verbod bromfiets mofa=yes bromfiets moped=yes snelle fiets speed_pedelec=yes ruiters horse=yes ;)
de highway=residential ipv cycleway op dat stukje weg motor_vehicle=no . succes
Gilliam Flebus (2024-02-17 21:46:06+00:00): @Jakka done
paulbrunner (2024-02-11 19:15:28+00:00): Salut Fabian

Cool, dass Du das Parkplatz-Mapping weiter vorantreibst!
Da Du ja eh mit JOSM mappst, ich habe hier mal einen Workflow beschrieben, der für Parkplätze schnell gute Ergebnisse bringt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144909996

Und sonst kann man in JOSM einen way auswählen und mit Taste "q" die Ecken rechtwinklig machen.

Bis bald und happy mapping,
Paul
stillhart (2024-02-11 19:56:06+00:00): Ja, es ist mal wieder Zeit. Leider hat die Stadt die Daten nicht aktualisiert. Evt werde ich da irgendwann mal nachfragen. Ich würde schon auch gerne die nicht mehr existierenden löschen. Gibt sicher einige...

Den aktuellen Stand siehst du hier, es sind langsam viel :-)
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1HdZ
skquinn (2024-02-13 04:20:29+00:00): Hi,

Please be aware of the specific syntax required by opening_hours and related tags. I have updated the information to fix the issues introduced in this edit.
Messinian (2024-03-08 07:01:26+00:00): thanks for fixing. I reviewed the syntax for future use.
MxxCon (2024-02-11 21:40:21+00:00): There's no need for changes in Alaska and Vietnam to be in the same changeset.🫤 Please split them by geographic region. That makes things much easier to review.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147312260
AlaskaDave (2024-02-12 02:15:09+00:00): I am in Thailand during the winter but I've been doing a lot of mapping in Alaska. I went away for the afternoon, made some mappable observations locally and merely forgot that the changeset was still open in Alaska when I added the new data to OSM.
keithonearth (2024-02-12 05:26:11+00:00): Wow! That's a pretty funny mistake!
AlaskaDave (2024-02-12 12:00:28+00:00): I have nade something like 16,000 edits in the 12 years since I started mapping with OSM and this is the first time I've ever gotten comments about the SIZE of a changeset.

I had no idea people would be so concerned about such things, or that people actually monitor changeset characteristics.

I promise I'll never do that again! LOL
AlaskaDave (2024-02-13 00:59:58+00:00): In further response to the concerns about the size of my changesets. I carefully used new layers when moving to another area of interest today (2024-02-13)  yet the bounding box of my changeset remained overly large, extending from Alaska to Sloan NY.

I just now discovered the reason for this, I had saved my session to enable a quick return to my earlier editing area in Alaska. However, unbeknownst to me, that huge bounding box came along with the restored session. So when I opened a new layer in NY, that data became part of my Alaska-based changeset.

I had never used the Save Session feature before and hadn't known about this aspect.
silversurfer83 (2024-02-13 08:12:21+00:00): Hey Dave :)

the communications part of the OSM community is a topic of debate among the users active on the forum (community.openstreetmap.org) or some of the more active chat groups. There it has been noted that users can go around for years without ever interacting with another user.

There acutally are some of us who try to monitor certain areas of The Map for changes and also try to interact with others. Since people are people it sometimes isn't easy finding the right words to convey the intended message which doesn't make interacting any easier.

You have popped up on quite some people's watchlists recently with the large bounding boxes which some people doing QA-work find a bit annoying. But that's it. It doesn't break anything it just makes it a bit harder to review your work.

I am sure that your work is very much appreciated and I for one wish save travels and happy mapping :)

cheers
silversurfer83
AlaskaDave (2024-02-13 12:35:26+00:00): I appreciate your feedback, silversurfer. I must say, I felt a bit as though I was being scolded for my oversight.

The thing with the saved session shocked me because I had just told the commenters that I would be more careful next time and then, I accidentally did it again.

I use like 6 different imagery layers when I'm mapping in Alaska and the idea of a saved session that reloads all those layers the next day seemed like an excellent idea. But there are drawbacks, as I learned.

Thanks again.
Xvtn (2024-02-14 22:53:13+00:00): Well put, Silversurfer. To add a little bit, I think the main reason people comment on huge changesets is because if you go to your area on osm.org and click history, depending on the activity in the area, many or even all of those changesets can be accidental world-spanning bounding boxes like this one. I'm of the opinion that using osm.org website directly is a bad way to monitor an area or review others' changes, but it definitely is the most obvious way.
Anyway, thanks for your contributions!
MxxCon (2024-02-14 23:32:06+00:00): Xvtn, I don't use OSM website. I use OsmCha and whodidit RSS feeds with fillets to monitor NYC. Such huge bboxes are a part of how OSM works.
If your know a tool that allows me to review changesets that ONLY affect my area of interest, do share them.
Xvtn (2024-02-15 00:01:27+00:00): In OSMcha you can filter limit the maximum bbox size. When reviewing my local area, I have it capped at 20x the size of my area of interest.
MxxCon (2024-02-15 00:06:44+00:00): That's not an acceptable solution. Just because a bbox is big it doesn't mean it has no changes in my area of interest.
DanielAgos (2025-10-01 20:32:42+00:00): Olá,

Faz sentido a via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137669934 ser pedestrian e ter lanes e maxspeed?
AntMadeira (2025-10-02 09:12:00+00:00): Olá, Daniel.
Não faz. Neste changeset limitei-me a passar a rua para pedestrian e não alterei essas etiquetas, que já estavam na linha há muitos anos. É uma zona muito complicada, porque tem muita coisa desatualizada e mapeada há muitos anos. O meu foco foi a EN 8, que levei muitas semanas a corrigir, e nem tudo à volta ficou bem.
Se puderes corrigir, agradeço.

Cumprimentos,
António.
DanielAgos (2025-10-02 20:56:53+00:00): Feito, obrigado pelo esclarecimento
canfe (2024-02-11 06:47:47+00:00): Il landuse vicino a Case Bottini non è un grass ma un giardino
nevw (2024-02-11 02:35:41+00:00): The members of the relation for Clifton Beach should not carry the tags you added. These tags are only added to the multipolygon relation.
If you intend to edit relations, I suggest you use the Josm editor instead so that you can at least get a better appreciation of the relation extent and how it is constructed.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Usage
nevw (2024-02-11 12:36:04+00:00): I have reverted the changeset which will restore the admin boundary for Clifton Beach. The mp boundary ways are also shared by neighbouring admin boundaries and only carry a geometry source tag.
treestryder (2024-03-10 01:41:53+00:00): In OpenStreetMap parlance, a bar is a noisy (audio/visual) place. For Homebrew, I am going to try leisure=amusement_arcade instead of bar. Needs a tag stating the games are analog.

My wife knows the owner and says you would you would likly enjoy this place.

https://www.homebrewgamelounge.com/
treestryder (2024-03-10 06:14:26+00:00): After visiting it myself, I am sticking with my decision. Though, it is very close to a British pub, intended for talking and serves alcohol.
Warin61 (2024-02-14 04:30:39+00:00): Some of these are not PTv2 compliant... 

Relations 15631643, 3552678, 3386431, 15631643, 5985178, 3738476, 2509188
 and 3552679 ...  not PTv2 compliant. 

5 relations with gaps.. 

I have attempted some corrections... however someone has made some changes during my changes - so I have taken them in preference to my own.
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-11 02:19:47+00:00): You should not remove features just because they are private.  Access tags should be used instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147313689
MxxCon (2024-02-16 04:18:17+00:00): Since in US there’s no official regulatory body managing hotel star ratings and each hotel can rate themselves however many stars they want, it serves no purpose other than promotional/advertisement for the hotels.

As such, the use of stars=* tag for hotels should be deprecated.
Mashin (2024-02-11 09:28:36+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! 
Thanks for for fixing the road location, that was indeed placed in a wrong spot.

I just noticed that you forgot to delete a driveway that was in the same location so I went ahead and fixed that.

Cheers
Mashin (2024-02-11 09:40:51+00:00): Hi, there is no need to remove driveways. 
If a driveway has a gate or a 'no trespassing' sign we put access=private tag on the road. 
If the road has a sign saying private, but is without a gate or trespassing restriction we label it as ownership=private.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-14 03:57:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133249855 - nie widzę śladów jakoś na zdjęciach lotniczych podanych jako źródło

są jakieś widoczne ślady w terenie? Jak tak to jakie?

podobnie z resztą linii dodanych jako nadal mające widoczne istniejące ślady
MC436 (2026-06-16 20:19:48+00:00): Od Spartakusa do Palmir widać, bo są drogi w śladzie toru. I jest nasyp na terenie AWF.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-23 15:09:01+00:00): "drogi w śladzie toru" to za mało - samej kolei są jakieś ślady?
Anaqreon (2024-06-15 19:39:53+00:00): Today I visited this area for the first time and contributed [this changeset](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152730818), which partially addresses [your fixme node](https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11609047438). However I do not see the trail or the sculptures I added on the map. Is there a delay for review or something?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-02 18:36:28+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112158681/history has shop = house that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=house ? Are they selling houses? Products for furnishing house? Something else? ( shop=prefabricated_house for say prefabricated houses being sold there? )
blackboxlogic (2024-02-11 14:28:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for adding these buildings.

You deleted some address nodes (for example 212 Wilson Street, and 200 Wilson Street) which means if anyone wanted to get driving directions there, they can't. Some of your address deletes seem reasonable (4 Somerset Street) because there's no building, but keep in mind that empty lots have addresses too. An empty lot address might mistakenly have a building tag, which you can fix by deleting the building tag but leaving the address. I've put some of the addresses you deleted back because I see buildings on satellite imagery and the address seems reasonable in context, but I'm not local so I could be mistaken?

My changes are at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147329830

Ask if you have any question, -Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147314282
Hufkratzer (2024-02-11 13:30:07+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1248958378 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1248958418 are riding arenas and not riding centers. Riding arenas are usually tagged leisure=pitch instead of leisure=horse_riding. In JOSM you can use the preset for sport=equestrian to tag them correctly.

The paddock (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1248958381) shoud not get a horse_riding tag either. The tag leisure=horse_riding could be used to map the whole "horse property" as a separate node or area; example: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/773021652
See also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Riding_centre_(equestrian)
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2024-02-13 08:33:57+00:00): Why did you delete place=city?
3bdillahi (2024-02-13 08:37:28+00:00): Not deleted...change the name for the correct spelling!!!!
ADAC Touristische InfoSysteme (2024-02-13 08:40:45+00:00): you deleted the Tag place=city... see Version 19
3bdillahi (2024-02-13 08:46:17+00:00): Tags; there are different names for each language; thats what I fixed...the way it was created with one of the tags was wrong and fixed.
I downloaded correct version from the OSM API...thanks
silversurfer83 (2024-02-13 07:22:39+00:00): Gude :)

du hast hier fixmes an Gebäuden hinterlassen. Wenn du im Editor die Hintergrundbilder umschaltest, findest du das NRW Liegenschaftskataster. Dort sind die Häuser schon inkl. Hausnummer verzeichnet. 

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147314706
nrailuj (2024-02-13 19:33:59+00:00): Moin ;)
Habe es hier angepasst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147423511
Grüße Julian
silversurfer83 (2024-02-13 19:41:05+00:00): Top
Danke :)

Grüße
silversurfer83
nyampire (2024-02-11 08:33:40+00:00): こんにちは、OSMへようこそ。

すみません、昨今、ユーザ名に mic_ という接頭辞をつけたユーザが多く登録され、建物名などの編集を行っているようです。
OSMへの参加はどなたでも行うことができ、また、企業として編集に参加をいただくことは基本的に歓迎するものではありますが、いくつかの注意点があります。
ご確認をいただけますでしょうか。

* 企業などが組織的に編集を行う場合、「Orrganised Editing Guidelines」に従う必要があります。
* 具体的には、OSM wikiへのドキュメント作成や、編集内容などのコミュニティへの連絡などを行う必要があります。

https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

* こちらについてご確認をいただき、対応をお願いできるでしょうか。
* もし不明点がありましたら、OSMF Japanでも相談を受け付ける事が可能です。info@osmf.jp までご連絡ください。

また、mic_ を接頭辞にもつユーザさんの編集には、自身で調査をされたとは考えづらい、広域の編集も多く見られます。
それらの編集に際し、著作権あるいはその他の権利で保護された情報源を活用している可能性があると考えています。
OSMは、自由な地図であり続けるために、特別な許諾が無い限り、他の地図やデータセットからの転載を禁じています。

こちらについて、どのような情報源を用いて名称や建物階数の編集を行っているか、ご教示をいただけるでしょうか。

https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright

```
著作権侵害

OpenStreetMapの協力者は、著作権者から明確な許諾を得ずに、著作権のある情報源 (例: Google マップや印刷された地図) から決してデータを持ち込まないよう注意するものとします。
```

もしお返事をいただけない場合、内容の疑わしい編集と判断し、Data Working Groupと協力の上、対象ユーザの凍結および関連する編集の巻き戻しを行います。
以上二点、何卒よろしくお願いいたします。
mic_kkatayama (2024-02-13 09:16:16+00:00): コメントありがとうございます。

1点目につきましては、弊社Micwareのプロジェクト管理より別途ご連絡いたします。

2点目についてですが、弊社では社員個人の実測に基づいて情報を入力しておりますので、sourceは現地調査、あるいは地元知識としております。

今回コメントいただいたこちらの編集については、私個人の実家が兵庫県小野市にあり、5年ほど前まで居住しており、また、年に数回は帰省しているため、その知識を元に入力しております。

mic_接頭辞のついた、というご指摘ですので、私以外の投稿についてもあるいは同様に広域にわたる投稿があるかもしれませんが、同様の理由によるものと思われます。もし他のmic_接頭辞ユーザーでも同様のご指摘があるようでしたら、こちらも弊社プロジェクト管理よりご連絡させていただきます。
nyampire (2024-02-14 02:25:37+00:00): こんにちは、ご連絡をいただき、誠にありがとうございます。

昨日、別の方からも同様にご連絡をいただきました。
1,2ともに了解しました。
特に2についてはOSMの特質上、たいへん気にかけている部分であったため、とても安心しています。
不躾な指摘をしてしまい、たいへん申し訳ありませんでした。

組織的編集にあたるかどうかは微妙なラインなので、御社のプロジェクト管理のかたともお話をさせていただきたいと思います。
企業として編集に参加していただけることはたいへんありがたく、前向きに話を進められたらと思っています。

今後とも何卒よろしくお願いいたします。
Kovoschiz (2024-02-11 16:57:19+00:00): Please avoid connecting `proposed:highway=`  unless you know the junction arrangement. Is it an at-grade intersection, roundabout, or grade-separated interchange? How does it reserve for connecting Northern Metropolis Highway?. This makes editing other opened features more difficult.
Black_Diamond (2024-02-12 08:26:26+00:00): Thanks for the refinement.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-11 05:40:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237833091

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2024-02-12 15:35:53+00:00): Poprawiłem. Przy okazji poprawiłem błędny moduł generujący ulice.
Pozdrawiam
tastrax (2024-02-11 10:22:24+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Dodko (2024-05-25 21:49:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4848500399
kreditnou kartou sa dá platiť a debetnou nie?
lubosb (2024-05-31 06:12:56+00:00): Ďakujem za upozornenie, opravil som to - platba len v hotovosti.
Dodko (2024-05-31 06:43:47+00:00): Na bezkartové prevádzky sa môže použiť jeden tag
payment:cards=no

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/payment%3Acards=no#chronology
WindStream (2024-02-20 10:09:08+00:00): Здравствуйте. Откуда информация что ВСМ-3 пройдёт по такому варианту?
mavl (2024-02-23 18:52:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
ForestFurnace (2024-03-06 18:24:36+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. There was already a node for the Little Szechuan restaurant when you added this. If the information on the existing restaurant node is incorrect, please edit the existing node instead of creating a duplicate restaurant node.
This is the existing Little Szechuan restaurant that should be modified if its information is out of date: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3723555525
TrickyFoxy (2024-03-31 21:07:55+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149408312
Supaplex (2024-05-29 04:03:54+00:00): Revert due to it being a fake bus station

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151969801
ForestFurnace (2024-03-08 03:50:27+00:00): What is your source for determining that the Sunset Park playground (as seen in Bing, PEMA, and ESRI aerial imagery) is now a basketball court? I have just spoken to an employee of the State College Borough who told me that there is still only one basketball court located north of the baseball diamond and that the playground has not been converted into a second basketball court.
ForestFurnace (2024-03-06 18:36:47+00:00): You appear to have changed a line that was part of the Pine Grove Mills border into an unclassified road. Are you claiming that this entire line is a road that you have personally verified using GPS? If you examine Grissinger Camp Lane in the Centre County Public Parcel Viewer, you can see that it does not extend west past South Water Street. In addition, your line goes through the scrub area under the power line and through part of the driveway of the house located at 1010 Pine Grove Road. Please do not repurpose town borders into roads and do not add roads without verifying that the entire road that you have added exists.
https://gissites4.centrecountypa.gov/java/publicparcelviewer/
ForestFurnace (2024-03-06 18:28:24+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. CEO Karaoke was already present on the map before you added it as a duplicate business. Please check to make sure that a business is not already present before you add it to the map. If changes to CEO Karaoke are needed, then please edit the existing business here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8188517784
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 17:34:49+00:00): Hello!

You used
surface=niet-bestraat2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1248988537/history

Have you maybe meant
surface=unpaved
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Warin61 (2024-02-16 22:23:45+00:00): Bus stop error ... empty role .. and it is a duplicate of already entered stop ... suggest that it is no sequential...
mcliquid (2024-02-12 08:22:00+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
habib_amir (2024-02-13 03:22:38+00:00): Добрый день. Откуда информация взята?
Mikhail Kruglov (2024-02-13 15:21:05+00:00): Здравствуйте. Личные наблюдения + проект реконструкции.
habib_amir (2024-02-13 15:34:05+00:00): А проект с сайта госзакупок взят или из новостей? :)
richlv (2024-02-12 11:23:40+00:00): This change might not stick, as the official address seems to be assigned to the building right to southeast, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249444948/history .
Addresses are automatically synchronised in Latvia, and that will likely remove address from this building and assign it to the SE one.

This could also be useful to discuss in the OSM Latvian community chat, https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-16 11:44:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147528659 where the changeset comment is: revert edits by user who believed to be editing a private map, DWG Ticket#2024021410000255
user_14538650 (2024-02-11 12:12:59+00:00): Happy tết!
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-02-11 08:37:18+00:00): 参考资料

* http://www.qingzhou.gov.cn/detail/front/details/temp1665552428993040385.html
* http://www.qingzhou.gov.cn/detail/front/details/temp1641710598857842689.html
* http://www.qingzhou.gov.cn/detail/front/details/temp1635832518704590850.html
* http://www.qingzhou.gov.cn/detail/front/details/temp1632622172263079938.html
* http://www.qingzhou.gov.cn/detail/front/details/temp1643124169470865410.html

由于中国的网络限制，通常来自非中国大陆的互联网请求是无法接通的，但从法律角度它们确实属于Public Domain的数据，因为是行政性的公开
Awoobis (2024-02-11 16:56:50+00:00): te aliexpresowe sie zmieniły w dhl? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11160747604
NieWnen (2024-02-11 17:06:49+00:00): Globalnie się zmieniają w Polsce :P
Palgrave Peter (2024-02-28 16:13:50+00:00): Way: 576967371 looks rather odd. Does the place have a name?
os-emmer (2024-03-22 20:10:05+00:00): Hello Netzwolf,
is it possible that you made a typo here? The abbroviation for Japan is "JP" and not "JA".
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249000524
mavl (2024-02-23 18:52:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
bxl-forever_repair (2024-02-11 10:28:09+00:00): Hello,

If "barrier=hampshire_gate" correctly reflects the situation, changing into a simple "barrier=yes" degrades the quality of the information.

Applying the wrong tags with the purpose of getting an object better rendered on the map is a really bad idea.  I encourage you to restore the tags, especially if you know what kind of gates there are here.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

FYI, Hampshire gate are properly rendered in many apps in the OSM ecosystem: OsmAnd~ shows it correctly.
OlivierHaricots (2024-02-11 10:46:57+00:00): Point taken about not applying the wrong tags with the purpose of getting an object better rendered on the map.

In this case, the gates don't even look like hampshire gates at all, cfr. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hampshire_gate
bxl-forever_repair (2024-02-11 11:32:23+00:00): Thanks for the answer.
If you’ve been there and know the type of gate, perhaps you can change it into something better.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
OlivierHaricots (2024-02-11 11:42:45+00:00): Yes I was there, but a while ago. The gates were made of hard materials (not just hampshire gates) but can't remember if it was wood, metal or both, better leave it to the next contributer :)
Dodko (2024-02-13 10:09:38+00:00): Vaša obec neschválila pomenovanie ulíc, adresa je preto bez názvu ulice
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/13786284
Najprv poslanci majú schváliť VZN o názvoch ulíc, potom obec pridelí každému domu orientačné číslo a zapíše do registra adries, tak si vymeníte občianske preukazy už s novou adresou.

Upravil som aj ostatné domy v obci https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=147396927
Marián Ochodnický (2024-02-17 17:03:44+00:00): Vďaka za info.