piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Bdrammel (2026-07-29 15:54:30+00:00): Hi. This is on the site of the 'Ancienne Ecole des Vétérinaires de Cureghem' where every building carries the name of the former use. In a future edit I will also name the other buildings with their official names.
eggie (2026-07-29 13:16:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Deedback Dit geeft een foutmelding landuse op landuse construction.
Wanneer het een gebouw is kun je dat laten importeren via het forum van osm via het draadje BAG importverzoeken. 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-29 13:30:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-07-29 13:45:21+00:00): Dag MxM

De pitch is het daadwerkelijke speelveld met de belijning. Dat hoeft niet het hele sportterrein te zijn. 
Nu zie ik ook een pitch in een pitch.
Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-29 13:47:38+00:00): Van de Stadsbeek heb ik layer=-1 verwijderd.
eggie (2026-07-29 13:50:49+00:00): De culvert heb ik deels hersteld
Wildsharky (2026-07-31 07:44:46+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186683556
Kovoschiz (2026-07-31 08:34:45+00:00): This isn't called revert. You didn't undo anything. Please at least use correct terminology. 
You don't need to mention everything you done either. It's clearly this is a oversight, and not intentional.
Kovoschiz (2026-07-31 12:37:19+00:00): (Some users may be annoyed. And you saying it's a revert will cause misunderstood anger. )
Wildsharky (2026-07-31 07:35:33+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186682586
Udarian (2026-07-29 19:24:28+00:00): ALPR's should not be attached to road centerlines, they should be placed the position they actually are at.

Happy mapping,
Udar
osmjaw (2026-07-29 20:14:20+00:00): Sorry, new at this.  Feel free to fix it please.  I thought I had put it where the actual cam was, but I guess I goofed it.
eggie (2026-07-29 15:05:09+00:00): Dag Gerstbroodje. Beter geen access=yes op wegen taggen.

Ook bicycle en foot=yes is allemaal default.
Wanneer je motor_vehicle=no tagt is het wel nuttig om moped en mofa=yes te taggen. Die categorie ziet osm als motorvoertuigen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-07-29 15:06:40+00:00): access yes heb ik in ieder geval verwijderd.
user_5359 (2026-07-31 16:34:49+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14058761994. What is the mean of the tags
OBJECTID = 196
admin1_nam = Jonglei
admin1_pco = SS03
admin2_nam = Duk
admin2_pco = SS0305
admin3_nam = Dongchak
admin3_pco = SS030502
confidenti = msf
edit_by = MAIN_WRITER
edit_date = 2026/06/04 14:31:19.000
geoprecisi = approx
globalid = {59573A7F-20CD-4186-8A14-C0A39D3D0B75}
iso3 = ssd
Please notice also the wrong start_date value:
start_date = 1899-12-30  instead of start_date = 1899/12/30 00:00:00.000
Sylabowy Kot (2026-07-29 20:16:26+00:00): Witaj w OSM! 
Prośba, by punkty sklepów umieszczać "wewnątrz" budynku, a nie po za nim. Wtedy też sklep jest rozumiany jako część budynku pod tym adresem. 

Ważne jest też podawanie źródeł np. wizja lokalna. Nie kopiujemy z Google Maps.
cotyrobayeszz (2026-07-30 18:46:18+00:00): Dziękuje za poradę!
Jestem nowy w OSM.
Zrobie zmiany ASAP.
SLMLS (2026-07-29 14:10:19+00:00): And Żabka.
Frans S (2026-07-30 12:07:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You mapped courtyards or an empty spot as a building.
Check this mappings please:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1545646104/history#map=19/1.539900/30.252912

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423947502/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965975776/history

You can recognize these objects to their color and absence of a shadow.
Just look good at the object and surroundings. ( I remove them)
Best regards
Kovoschiz (2026-07-29 17:54:27+00:00): Area should be kept as `=station`
cartografy (2026-07-29 22:14:02+00:00): Source correction: 
Staðfangaskrá; Mapbox Satellite
Joe-w (2026-07-29 15:30:01+00:00): The UPRN import is irrelevant here, as the address data already existed on ways.

There's no consensus on the OSM UK forum or wiki to batch convert addr ways to nodes via automated scripting. It is discouraged due to making the history a mess. Please could you stop!
JassKurn (2026-07-30 12:53:27+00:00): Hi Joe-w,

You raised this issue in the OSM UK forum and I've given a response there.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapper-is-batch-converting-addr-tagged-ways-to-new-nodes/145899/6
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-31 02:41:24+00:00): "closed" on a lot of these hours should probably be "off" instead, right?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186589452
Corbeno (2026-07-31 03:24:22+00:00): I've never seen that standard before. This site (which I used) seems to accept "closed" https://opening-hours.pages.dev/
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-31 04:10:45+00:00): Oh, well, seems we both learned something new today.  Neat!
nerihv (2026-07-29 14:50:28+00:00): modifiqué polígonos mapeados hace 5 años.
Usé fondo bing 
desplazamiento (usando como referencia el mapeo existente): -2.35, 0.59
esri: 1.43, 1.61
mapbox : 2.44, 1.14
Fraxi (2026-07-29 18:18:58+00:00): Не само. Имаш и таг healthcare=laboratory
ETPCU_James (2026-07-29 14:53:18+00:00): If you search 5000 George Richie Road in Longview Texas it points to the wrong place. I am attempting to correct that entry as well.
unenTT (2026-07-31 16:47:48+00:00): Hi James, I understand the issue, but the solution you have implemented is against the OSM community guidelines unfortunately. 

The name of the road should be reverted to its previous state, without any numbering, as the numbers should be incorporated into the buildings with appropriate address tags. 

When I check the info on the Credit Union building, I'm seeing that the address is tagged properly as 5000 E George Richey Road. So I'd assume that the issue is not with OSM data, but with the software you are mentioning. 

I'd also want to share the following article, as tagging for the renderer/router is not encouraged within the OSM community: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Please feel free to reach out and let me know how I can be of help in resolving the issue. All the best.
Wildsharky (2026-07-30 13:16:41+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186641141
Tecfan (2026-07-29 15:03:49+00:00): Source removal of pathway and addition of new: https://www.uio.no/tjenester/eiendom/byggearbeider/#:~:text=Ny%20gangvei%20fra%20Blindernveien%20til%20Villa%20Eika
Fraxi (2026-07-29 20:09:57+00:00): Благодаря! Ако може, когато Ви е удобно, вижте дали и way/172610354 и way/172610398 са така. Добавял съм ги според отворените данни на АГКК, но се намират западно от "Монах Спиридон".
CROCODILEALLIGATOR (2026-07-30 10:53:37+00:00): Не знам кога ще мога да мина, но ги разгледах в сайта на АГКК. Нещо не ми излизат сметките. Къщите, срещуположно на way/172610354 и way/172610398 са регистрирани на Захари Зограф. Къщите на изток също са Зографи Молерови 2Б и 2А. Това дублира 2А. Също, самата улица Захари Зограф излиза като Зографи Молерови като кликна на нея. Но на самата карта е маркирана като Захари Зограф. Чудя се да не би да има някаква грешка в данните на АГКК? Ако трябва мога да върна картата назад, въпреки че Захари Зограф изглежда по-точна.
Fraxi (2026-07-30 10:57:48+00:00): Напълно възможно е да има грешка и в кадастралните данни. И на мен ми се е случвало да срещам разминавания между подадени там адреси и това, което съм виждал на живо като номера и улици.
Fraxi (2026-07-30 10:59:40+00:00): А ако е имало и преименуване на отделните отсечки или на целите улици "Захари Зограф" и "Зографи Молерови", нещо да не е отразено. Самите имена си приличат. Напълно е възможно да става дума за грешка.
cartografy (2026-07-30 14:06:25+00:00): Resource correction: Staðfangaskra; Esri World Imagery
nerihv (2026-07-29 15:27:37+00:00): casita tapada por árbols mapeado con esri comparando con mapbox
StC (2026-07-30 07:23:30+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Marvk (2026-07-30 00:16:51+00:00): Hi Mycrana und willkommen auf OSM!

Aus welchem Grund hast du die Einfahrten jetzt am Ende doch gelöscht? Dein erster Versuch mit access=private sah eingetlich schon gut aus, zumindest für die östliche Einfahrt.

Da diese Einfahrten in der Realität existieren, ist es im Normalfall auch in Ordnung, sie zu mappen, nur halt eben mit einer Zugangsbeschränkung access=private

Grüße
Marv
Mycrana (2026-07-30 10:03:54+00:00): Hallo!

Das Problem ist folgendes: In diesem Bereich liegt die Hausnummer 13a auf dem Dünenweg, die Hausnummern 14 und 20a befinden sich jedoch auf der Theodor-Heuss-Straße. 

OSM zeigt in der Routenführung an, dass man von der Grundstückseinfahrt am Dünenweg zur Hausnummer 14 und 20a kommt. Die Grundstückseinfahrt führt jedoch nur zur Hausnummer 13a. 
Hausnummer 14 und 20a sind nur von der Theodor-Heuss-Straße aus zu erreichen. 

Fast täglich fahren Lieferanten die Einfahrt vom Dünenweg rein und kommen dann nicht mehr raus, da man dort nicht drehen kann und OSM anzeigt dass Hausnummer 14 und 20a nur von dort zu erreichen sind. 

Aktuell finde ich keine Möglichkeit, dass OSM die Routenführung anpasst, sodass es richtig anzeigt wird: 

Dünenweg 13a = Grundstückseinfahrt vom Dünenweg

Theodor-Heuss-Straße 14 und 20a = Grundstückseinfahrt von der Theodor-Heuss-Straße.

KEINE Verbindung vom Dünenweg aus zur Theodor-Heuss-Straße

Als ich die Zugangsbeschränkung eingestellt hatte, hat die Routenführung den Fehler trotzdem weiterhin gemacht. Wobei ich es nun getestet hab und es weiterhin falsch angezeigt wird.
Marvk (2026-07-30 10:11:56+00:00): Hi, was meinst du genau mit OSM-Routenführung? OSM selbst hat keinen Router, meinst du zum Beispiel OSRM (https://project-osrm.org/)? Router benötigen normalerweise einige Zeit, um Änderungen zu verarbeiten und in das Routing zu integrieren, daher ist es durchaus normal, dass deine Änderungen nicht sofort Auswirkungen auf das Routing haben :-)

Beste Grüße 
Marv
hsc666 (2026-07-30 16:57:32+00:00): Das Problem entsteht, da Router versuchen, so nah wie möglich an das Ziel zu navigieren. Ein Router kann nicht wissen, dass dort kein Durchgang ist. Das Ende der Zufahrt war schlicht näher an den HNr 14/20a, als die richtige Straße. Das Verhalten lässt sich aktuell auch nicht grundsätzlich verhindern. 

Hier im konkreten Fall ist eine Lösung noch vergleichsweise einfach - indem die Zufahrten zu allen HNr eingetragen werden. Ich habe daher die ursprüngliche wiederhergestellt und zwei neue auf der anderen Seite ergänzt. Bis das von den diversen Routern erkannt und berücksichtigt wird, werden ein paar Tage bis Wochen vergehen.
caprieldeluca (2026-07-29 20:28:15+00:00): Hola. Lamentablemente tengo que revertir su cambio y solicitar el bloqueo de su cuenta por etiquetar contra el consenso (abreviaturas en nombres de avenidas), habiendo sido contactado por este medio previamente, en reiteradas oportunidades.
Por cualquier consulta o aclaración, puede contactarse con la comunidad de OpenStreetMap Argentina: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
BCNorwich (2026-07-30 06:43:55+00:00): Fiction road removed.
eerib (2026-07-29 15:47:32+00:00): Discussion in

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186424970
BCNorwich (2026-07-30 06:29:37+00:00): Your footpaths are mapped on top of existing highways; this duplication coud disrupt routing.
BCNorwich (2026-07-30 06:29:55+00:00): I've removed the duplications.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-29 19:38:14+00:00): This is a bit of an edge case--aside from the ways around the circle (which should definitely not have service=parking_aisle ), all of these ways have parking stalls and serve the primary function of accessing them, and given the structure of the lot arguably only the center way provides true through access, with the three loops only providing access to the parking stalls they directly serve. While alternatively one _could_ argue the alternative, that all the ways here are in fact not parking aisles, I think the first interpretation is reasonable enough that I'm not going to majorly change what you did here.

I did fix the classification of the ways around the circle, as well as add some missing oneway=* tags and clean up extra nodes in the geometry, in changeset 

https://osm.org/changeset/186606355
Alexb60 (2026-07-30 11:43:22+00:00): Bonjour,

Pourquoi avez-vous modifié le contour du bâtiment de la gare de Lille-Europe ? Ce nouveau tracé ne correspond absolument pas au bâtiment de la gare. De plus, vous avez englobé tout un tas d'objets qui n'ont rien à voir avec la gare dans une relation "douteuse" avec le tag building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21162126).
nerihv (2026-07-29 16:03:34+00:00): mapie lo faltante con esri 
desplazamiento usado 4.2, -2.61
referencia el mapeo anterior
BCNorwich (2026-07-30 06:10:55+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted this changeset because it only added duplicated highways to the database, thus causing disruption to routing.

Please make sure you don't duplicate any highways; check before uploading.

Regards Bernard.
Nic Reich (2026-07-31 04:58:13+00:00): Thanks for fixing my error!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186594042
mibd (2026-07-29 16:10:00+00:00): There is a pop-up restaurant here right now, from 26 jun to 30 aug, and that is what I added opening hours for - though it seems that's not quite right, as svampe kompagniet food is listed as a factory and not restaurant. should i have added another entity instead, given this is a temporary installation?
Syl (2026-07-30 06:15:06+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai remis les types des bâtiments, quand on ajoute des parties ils ne doivent pas être enlevés du polygone principal.
Toto2642 (2026-07-31 08:53:09+00:00): Bonjour,
D'acc' ! Merci bien ! Si je comprends bien du coup, si j'ai un bâtiment A, avec une partie hangar A1, et une partie habitation A2, je mets le tag "building=house" sur A et sur A2 ? Merci ☺️
PattaFeuFeu (2026-07-29 22:33:08+00:00): Hi!

Dass 22 kW Type2 vorhanden ist, ist schon in den sonstigen Tags festgelegt. Vielleicht als Beschreibung noch für solche Apps praktisch, die die Spezialtags nicht anzeigen, aber etwas doppelt gemoppelt.

Bei der Website frage ich mich allerdings, ob die so stehen bleiben sollte: Website sollte eigentlich die offizielle Website eines Features sein, hier ist’s aber ein Drittanbieter, der halt auch diese Ladestation drin hat.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186597190
mx-5_ler (2026-07-30 08:24:48+00:00): Hallo, ich kann es auch gern wieder raus nehmen.
pwbriggs (2026-07-31 06:37:41+00:00): Thanks. It sounds like the access aisles still exist through the parking lot, then? If that's the case, they should just get an access=private but not be deleted from the map-- otherwise other mappers will see the parking lot in aerial imagery and add them back.

Is there a gate or fence around this parking lot?
caprieldeluca (2026-07-29 21:01:08+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir con el mapa!

Creemos que algunas de las modificaciones incluidas no son correctas, ya que quedaron los edificios de la marina dentro de un polígono de agua. Además, se eliminaron otros edificios y un sector boscoso sin justificación, lo que solo produce que otra persona visualice las imágenes satelitales y vuelva a mapearlos, multiplicando esfuerzos innecesariamente.

Por cualquier consulta o aclaración sobre cómo mapear la marina y sus alrededores, podés contactarte directamente con la comunidad OpenStreetMap Argentina: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
user_5359 (2026-07-31 16:23:25+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/639247686. What is the mean of the tag 4066 = EBS?
Sint E7 (2026-07-31 16:28:59+00:00): Corrected; should've been the operator and not the zone-number.
pwbriggs (2026-07-31 06:39:59+00:00): Thanks for the contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Feel free to reach out any time if you have questions.
Supaplex (2026-07-30 02:35:32+00:00): 請問已經完全拆除了嗎？如果不是請不要預先刪除，依據實際的拆除狀況再移除
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186598533
Supaplex (2026-07-30 05:04:31+00:00): 看新聞與公告，看來是提前整個拆除完畢
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-31 12:23:50+00:00): Looks like you put one set of racks in the wall by accident.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186598657
Nic Reich (2026-07-31 04:55:46+00:00): Hello!  Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.  Your edit did not go through correctly.  All of the tags were inside of the "man_made" tag.  I've corrected it now.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186598968
Wildsharky (2026-07-31 07:43:01+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186683429
Sammyhawkrad (2026-07-30 07:59:04+00:00): Hello Jagri Matulnbe Gladys, always remember to add the building=yes tag. Most of the buildings you added here do not have them. 

Avoid adding random nodes with no tags. 

Keep your bounding boxes small; if you map in an area, upload that before you start mapping in another area far away.
Sammyhawkrad (2026-07-30 08:00:07+00:00): The building=yes tags are missing
felipeeugenio (2026-07-29 20:54:09+00:00): Hola. el numero de un edificio es addr:housenumber
La letra es addr:unit. El nombre es para otro tipo de dato.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186600105
Sammyhawkrad (2026-07-30 08:04:53+00:00): Adding building=yes is enough. Don't add name=building; it's a generic name and doesn't distinguish it from any other building. 

You also add random tags to nodes on buildings. Kindly pay attention and avoid this error.

When the editor raises errors while saving, it means you have mistakes. Please fix them before you upload your changes.
rempshaener (2026-07-29 18:51:29+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe nur eine Anmerkung: Da Hydranten keinen Namen haben, müsste der Wert gelöscht werden.
Bei Fragen bitte melden.

Viele Grüße
plennert (2026-07-30 06:09:44+00:00): Hallo Sternentor,
bitte mach kleinere changesets, welche somit besser und leichter und geografisch enger sowie nachvollziehbar sind.

Gruss und Danke.
schobbish (2026-07-31 00:15:30+00:00): Hi there, I've reverted this in changeset 186676899. Since this building has multiple tenants, your practice should be put on a separate node rather than on the building itself. However in this case we already have DHAT mapped at node 8252836281 and I don't think it's worth having each provider mapped out separately.
rskedgell (2026-07-30 09:50:36+00:00): Thanks!
Fraxi (2026-07-29 18:32:45+00:00): Всъщност май не е коректно така, защото въпросното помещение, а и входа и магазините отляво, се намират в издадена напред част от сграда. Гледайки по Bing Streetside.То явно трябва тази(и съседни) да се преначертаят.
Fraxi (2026-07-29 18:42:10+00:00): Добавих част.
BCNorwich (2026-07-31 05:39:11+00:00): Reverted because it only added a duplicated highway, which could have caused routing problems.
pwbriggs (2026-07-31 05:55:32+00:00): These should not be deleted unless there are no cameras at all at these locations. You mentioned that these are not Flock cameras: does that mean these are simply traditional (non-ALPR) cameras?

Thanks!
eggie (2026-07-30 04:23:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2026-07-30 13:01:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please do not tag a highway =track when the trace leads of a highway to connect buildings. See the use for 'track"in the highway wiki,
Best regards
MassCartog (2026-07-29 21:53:20+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Wanted to let you know, If the feature exists on the ground, it is valid.

You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Even decommissioned trails should not be removed until they no longer exist. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

Also not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
rajdhani (2026-07-31 06:26:36+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186687651
bufferclip (2026-07-29 19:06:24+00:00): Kommentar sollte sein: Paketshop und Hundefrisör
Wildsharky (2026-07-30 13:17:43+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186641351
4TL4S (2026-07-29 23:27:01+00:00): Reverted changeset 186604765 to fix disconnected and overlapping features.
Wildsharky (2026-07-30 14:36:01+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186648151
SoulCover (2026-07-30 15:58:31+00:00): Danke für deinen ersten Beitrag zu OSM!
Ich habe es gerade nochmal überprüft: Auch in CoMaps wird der bereits vorhandene Rewe angezeigt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225566841
Hast du das nur übersehen oder gab es einen anderen Grund einen neuen Eintrag zu erstellen?
mem_map (2026-07-30 17:33:41+00:00): Hallo! Der way/225566841 existiert seit 13 Jahren, wurde aber in Comaps nicht angezeigt, als ich ihn hinzufügen wollte. In Organic Maps (v2026.07.23) mit aktuellen Karten ist er ebenfalls nicht zu finden.
SoulCover (2026-07-31 17:24:10+00:00): Ich habe das Duplikat wieder entfernt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186719601
Mir wird der vorhandene Rewe in CoMaps angezeigt - aber nur, wenn das Student Living Center nicht ausgewählt ist.
Falls du weiterhin Interesse daran hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kannst du mich auch gerne direkt anschreiben.
Wildsharky (2026-07-30 12:27:14+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186640715
MassCartog (2026-07-29 21:54:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Wanted to let you know, If the feature exists on the ground, it is valid.

You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Even decommissioned trails should not be removed until they no longer exist. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

Also not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-31 12:24:47+00:00): I'm seeing a *lot* of other landuses in this polygon making this border on geofiction.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186605434
MappingMore (2026-07-30 11:36:17+00:00): Reverted in  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186638981
Wildsharky (2026-07-30 14:37:20+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186648189
Wildsharky (2026-07-30 14:35:24+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186647985
GullibleMappazo (2026-07-29 19:41:43+00:00): I forgot I was adding survey points in Durham that’s also in this changes sorry