piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-03 08:06:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/11938999441 v5

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fysioterapia hieronta"
---
Esimerkiksi neutraalimpi ja tosiasiallisempi versio tekstilläsi voisi olla: "Fysioterapia hieronta"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-11 17:33:05+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179288611
Taya_S (2026-03-03 10:19:04+00:00): Deleted fake lighthouse and lifeguard nodes from the map

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179294059
NeisBot (2026-03-03 08:12:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13613839902 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Medical spa"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-11 17:33:05+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179289978
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-01 02:10:16+00:00): In addition, the entire commercial building was given the name and address of one single individual unit within it, which is of course not correct. I've fixed this as well as other related issues in 182055477 changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182055477
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-01 13:16:27+00:00): Thanks @CAM-Gerlach
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-01 16:12:38+00:00): Of course!

BTW, thank *you* so much for all your recent improvements to HDYC--it's gotten even more useful as a tool to analyze and celebrate both my own mapping and that of others!
pitscheplatsch (2026-05-02 07:56:51+00:00): You're welcome.
I'm glad to read that.

Cya
Wildsharky (2026-03-05 06:36:11+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179346011
ajmat (2026-03-04 17:37:07+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179360723
ika-chan! (2026-03-03 09:12:03+00:00): Hello, iD allows multiple buildings to be added in a single changeset. Doing so is appreciated, as it will be easier for us who use OSMCha to check edits by other users.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179289577
literan (2026-05-19 07:04:19+00:00): если вы не перестанете молча откатывать корректные правки, мне придется писать в DWG с просьбой о ваше
literan (2026-05-19 07:04:29+00:00): о вашей блокировке
Wildsharky (2026-05-20 05:33:04+00:00): Hi literan,
Thanks for reaching out and sharing your concern.
I’ve stopped reverting similar edits in Russia and will approach future changes more carefully. If there are specific cases you’d like me to review, feel free to share.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-07 11:15:34+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5194194

it appears that lifecycle prefix should be applied to more tags

see also https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/1982
balint36 (2026-05-08 07:54:09+00:00): platform_edge hogyan lehet disused? A peronszegély már nem tartja a peron térkövét?
Botond Balla (2026-05-09 07:25:26+00:00): Úgy hogy nincs használatban ;)
A Terebesi utca villamosmegállóját lezárás nélkül megszüntették, ez a BKK weboldalán, valamint a megállóban kihelyezett tájékoztatókon olvasható. Egy elhagyatott épületben is tartja a tető a cserepeket, lehet abandoned a primary key
balint36 (2026-05-09 11:35:55+00:00): Ez szép, de te - ahogyan azt feljebb is írják - koncepció nélkül használtad. A peronszegély számára kifejezetten indokolatlan. A peron is létezik. Egyedül a megállás lett kihagyva.
Botond Balla (2026-06-03 17:15:58+00:00): Mateusz-al az iD szerkesztő tagging schema GitHub oldalán nyitottam egy issue-t pont arra, hogy a helyes lifecycle tagek használatát a szerkesztő hibának jelezte. A peron nincs használatban.

Ahogyan azt az alábbi oldalon láthatod, a javasolt tagginget használtam:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused
balint36 (2026-06-03 17:29:22+00:00): Én nem látok hibát az iD-ben őszintén megmondva. A vasúton használt helyes disused címke párossal nem dob semmilyen hibát. A peronnál a wiki alapján ez alkalmazható.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-06 03:00:46+00:00): it should be also disused:public_transport=stop_position not public_transport=stop_position
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-06 03:01:28+00:00): as far as I can see
balint36 (2026-06-06 11:30:06+00:00): Is's a railway feature so railway=disused and disused:railway=* (for example platform). If I remember right with these two, the iD should't have problem with the public_transport=* tags.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-07 10:30:39+00:00): 1) if it is disused then also public_transport should be prefixed

2) iD in fact breaks on such bad tagging, see https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/1982
Glassman (2026-03-04 18:39:24+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179290729
Wildsharky (2026-03-06 03:55:08+00:00):  Reverted in changeset id: 179377543
nevw (2026-03-05 00:29:39+00:00): Hi, I noticed that osmi shows this
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=141.38437&lat=-37.85219&zoom=14
I have been unable to find the link to download the dataset used and most forest datasets I found were old.
Can you point to the source, thanks.
nevw (2026-03-10 10:52:11+00:00): Hi, I still need a link to the dataset you are using to import the Vic forests boundaries.
aussiegeek (2026-03-11 10:12:29+00:00): Hi, part of the VicMap collection mentioned at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Victoria
The download source is https://discover.data.vic.gov.au/dataset/public-land-management-plm25
nevw (2026-03-11 10:24:41+00:00): Thankyou
aharvey (2026-04-21 07:02:56+00:00): The PLM25 dataset isn't listed as part of Vicmap, so likely isn't covered under the existing waiver we have. Therefore it should not have been, or continue to be used as a source.

We can request a new waiver to cover it, but given that may never come (there was a request for an organisation wide waiver that was rejected), or may take a long time, as much as I don't like it, it seems we must remove this data from OSM.

Some of the data is available in Statewide Public Land Classification Boundaries - Vicmap Lite VMLITE PUBLIC LAND which we can use under the waiver, but it doesn't spell out the state forest names or even provide a polygon for each one....
nevw (2026-04-21 08:59:31+00:00): Thanks Andrew, I will begin reverting my changesets tomorrow.
nevw (2026-04-22 00:18:22+00:00): Completed reverting my changesets using unauthorised dataset PLM25
Yunan973 (2026-03-03 17:23:44+00:00): Bonjour,
on met outer sur le chemin extérieur et inner sur le chemin intérieur, pas le contraire : peux tu corriger le multipolygone ?
Cordialement
Yunan973 (2026-03-03 17:25:45+00:00): Et area=yes sur l'intérieur ne sert à rien
MappingMore (2026-03-05 03:06:36+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179376235
rohieb (2026-07-15 16:32:39+00:00): Ich stelle https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28133158 mal wieder her, da fehlt nämlich jetzt das komplette Wohngebiet um Jembke…
Ropino (2026-07-15 20:15:33+00:00): Danke :)
ajmat (2026-03-05 04:39:21+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 179377806
LordGarySugar (2026-03-07 01:13:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1484873169 should not be tagged as farmland. It's very clearly used as a paddock for horses/animals, and is not ploughed or mowed.
Wildsharky (2026-03-05 06:34:07+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179341849
MappingMore (2026-03-05 06:03:39+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179379563
MappingMore (2026-03-05 06:04:28+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179379563
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-04 04:47:36+00:00): Where exactly gate is located?
CrownEastLane (2026-03-04 09:17:29+00:00): Gate has been added.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-05 10:32:35+00:00): I do not see gate being marked anywhere



Where exactly gate is located?
Taya_S (2026-03-03 10:30:47+00:00): Reverted fantasy edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179294535
eggie (2026-03-03 10:45:16+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage.
Het is beter om de adresnode op de woning te gebruiken.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2026-03-03 10:58:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Kovoschiz (2026-03-04 18:28:32+00:00): HK BBQ should be eg `=picnic_site` + ` bbq=yes` + `fee=yes` ( `amenity=bbq` has been defined for individual grills) , surely not `=restaurant`
AndyB_66 (2026-03-04 17:27:41+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
HellMap (2026-07-06 08:47:41+00:00): As already requested multiple times, please stop changing areas to incorrect tags. These are not parks. All your edits have had consistent errors that need fixing.
eggie (2026-03-03 11:02:40+00:00): Reletive,
leisure=park op een node heb ik verwijderd.
Die tag  wordt voor een echt park gebruikt en als vlak getagd.
Staat daar geen picnictafel?

MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2026-03-03 10:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 52 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/744677550 v4 | 19 crossings
https://osm.org/way/744677549 v4 | 18 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1322442521 v3 | 15 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179293790
ajmat (2026-03-04 06:55:08+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179334390
qstep (2026-03-03 20:48:09+00:00): Üdv az OpenStreetMap-en! A weboldalon az alábbi nyitvatartás szerepel, melyik a helyes?

Hétfő: 8.00 – 16.00
Kedd: 8.00 – 17.00
Szerda: 8.00 – 16.00
Csütörtök: 8.00 – 16.00
Péntek: 8.00 – 12.00
MNIB_HU (2026-03-04 09:18:06+00:00): Köszönöm, hogy javítottad, emiatt kértem, hogy legyen leellenőrizve az általam beírtak.
A te "nyitvatartásod" a helyes.
Üdv,
András
Wildsharky (2026-03-05 06:33:13+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179340670
eggie (2026-03-03 11:03:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
tomhukins (2026-03-26 18:03:41+00:00): You have tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/790278404 as designation=public_bridleway and foot=designated while retaining access=private.  Is this way a private driveway, public bridleway, or something else?
NieWnen (2026-03-03 20:02:34+00:00): Zostały jeszcze 2 tagi dot. apteki
healthcare i ref:csioz. Co do adresów to nie trzeba ich duplikować, gdy jest już dodany do budynku. 

Dzięki za zmianę!
Wildsharky (2026-03-06 03:59:45+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179379732
gscholz (2026-03-16 07:21:33+00:00): Hi TAMTAM17,
this changeset has created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-5.26411&lat=35.17236&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179295678

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
TAMTAM17 (2026-03-16 12:53:40+00:00): Hi Guido,
Yes, of course, I’ll try my best to restore it all. Before my modifications, there were already quite a few errors, maybe they are related as well. 
Thanks for the feedback in any case :)
samuelzammit (2026-03-04 13:28:30+00:00): Thanks for adding this! I've updated the Wiki page for Malta: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Malta#Hiking_routes
Glassman (2026-03-04 18:40:13+00:00): Does the nature reserve have a name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179296293
Glassman (2026-03-04 18:42:43+00:00): The building tag should remain as long as it is there. If it is just a roof tag it as building=roof + layer=1. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179296293
GerdP (2026-05-06 07:16:49+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich rücke gerade ein paar Gebäudeumrisse in Lohne anhand des ALKIS Hintergrunds zurecht und bin dabei auf diese geplante Musikschule gestoßen. Das Tagging ist seltsam. 
amenity=school sagt, da ist eine Schule. Aber name="Musikschule Lohne (geplant)" sagt eher das Gegenteil.
Ich würde da eher ein planned:amenity=school setzen und name nur dann, wenn dort wirklich eine Musikschule ist, die "Musikschule Lohne" heisst. 
Nach meinen Fotos vom 28.4. sind dort nur leerstehende Geschäftsräume der Firma Rießelmann, aber ich habe nur nach den Hausnummern geschaut.
NeisBot (2026-03-03 11:18:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 32 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1214920828 v3 | 22 crossings
https://osm.org/way/277257865 v19 | 10 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/4295805061 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179296442
MappingMore (2026-03-04 11:40:11+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:179345189
simska (2026-03-03 12:58:16+00:00): Hello, I accidentally modified/deleted parts of the Struma river in Pernik while testing 3D export.
Could someone please revert my changeset 179267737?
Thank you.
Taya_S (2026-03-03 13:10:26+00:00): Reverted edits to the Struma River as requested. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/help-to-correct-the-struma-river-in-the-city-of-pernik-bulgaria/141990

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179301564
simska (2026-03-03 12:58:06+00:00): Hello, I accidentally modified/deleted parts of the Struma river in Pernik while testing 3D export.
Could someone please revert my changeset 179267737?
Thank you.
Trafford_Mapper (2026-03-03 14:34:49+00:00): Hi welcome to OpenStreetMap, you seem to have accidently dragged some roads within the car parks here in error, I've reverted them in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179305099
simska (2026-03-03 12:57:59+00:00): Hello, I accidentally modified/deleted parts of the Struma river in Pernik while testing 3D export.
Could someone please revert my changeset 179267737?
Thank you.
NeisBot (2026-03-03 11:42:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/7084326160 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dental practice"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-11 17:33:12+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179715063
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
Trafford_Mapper (2026-03-03 14:37:42+00:00): Hi you seem to have also accidently dragged a road here too, please be cautious when making edits making sure you don't drag roads randomly
NeisBot (2026-03-03 11:54:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13614350457 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Cosmetic clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-11 17:33:13+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179298518
NeisBot (2026-03-03 11:54:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13614334333 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Salon manicure"
---
Na przykład, bardziej neutralna i obiektywna wersja Twojego tekstu mogłaby brzmieć: "Manicure w salonie"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
bartgron (2026-03-03 20:10:06+00:00): Opis (tag description) został usunięty. OSM nie służy do reklamowania usług
mavl (2026-03-04 15:26:57+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удалил дорогу (проектируемую). Её вы добавили зачем-то снова. На участке трассы пропала информации о покрытии и числе полос. Нарушена связность статусов дорог. Этот пакет правок отменён.  
В этом месте ещё идёт реконструкция.
NeisBot (2026-03-03 12:06:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13613726886 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Printing shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-11 17:33:13+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/179329910
simska (2026-03-03 12:57:49+00:00): Hello, I accidentally modified/deleted parts of the Struma river in Pernik while testing 3D export.
Could someone please revert my changeset 179267737?
Thank you.
HAALAND_ (2026-03-14 13:12:34+00:00): 好端兄弟好端 就烦这种name标签写其他文字的傻逼
mavl (2026-03-04 16:02:41+00:00): Здравствуйте. Название заменено на такое же, но с буквой "ё".
Ozon OSM4 (2026-03-04 16:07:51+00:00): Спасибо
simska (2026-03-03 12:57:34+00:00): Hello, I accidentally modified/deleted parts of the Struma river in Pernik while testing 3D export.
Could someone please revert my changeset 179267737?
Thank you.
MappingMore (2026-03-05 06:38:35+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179380414
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-04 09:11:36+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM.

Wurden hier mehrere Wege gelöscht, weil sie keinen Asphaltbelag haben oder wie ist der Kommentar des Changesets zu interpretieren?

Danke und viele Grüße
MDOLF (2026-03-04 09:24:01+00:00): Hi.
Danke für die Nachfrage.
Der Eintrag mit dem Asphaltweg bezog sich nur auf einen Weg (64540666), der mit einem Hinweis markiert war und in der Örtlichkeit nur ein geschotterter Waldweg ist.
Die gelöschten Wege sind in der Örtlichkeit nicht mehr vorhanden.
Schöne Grüße
Patrick1977Bln (2026-04-04 11:56:27+00:00): El operador de las estaciones y de las instalaciones ferroviarias es Adif, no Renfe. (operator=Adif)
MarinoBM (2026-04-06 22:14:47+00:00): @Patrick1977Bln
Las estaciones y apeaderos con cartelería de Cercanías Renfe (incluyendo Rodalies de Barcelona y ex-FEVE) se mapearán como:
operator = Renfe
operator:wikidata = Q2476154
owner = Adif
owner:wikidata = Q358752

Las estaciones y apeaderos de Alta Velocidad de la RFIG en su mayoría como:
operator = Adif
operator:wikidata = Q358752
owner = Adif AV
owner:wikidata = Q115684403

El resto de la RFIG (con cartelería gris oscura y verde) como:
operator = Adif
operator:wikidata = Q358752
owner = Adif
owner:wikidata = Q358752

Para estaciones y apeaderos fuera de la RFIG, mapear según el operador local; depende de la red.
El propietario, el operador y las características de las estaciones de tren se pueden comprobar en el visor de Adif:

https://piservi.adif.es/piservi/portal

Ante la duda, contacta con el grupo ferroviario de OpenStreetMap España o con la comunidad local.

https://t.me/+-IzGLqWL90thNDhk

Un saludo.
Patrick1977Bln (2026-04-07 10:06:54+00:00): Hola,

vale, entonces en España se interpreta de tag operator diferente que en Alemania (DB InfraGO AG), Italia (Rete Ferroviaria Italiana), Francia (SNCF Gares & Connexions) o Inglaterra (Network Rail).

Allí, el operador es la empresa de infraestructuras ferroviarias. Y las estaciones y apeaderos estatales en España pertenecen a Adif. 

Además, hay otras ambigüedades. En Madrid-Chamartín paran tanto trenes de larga distancia como regionales. Entonces, allí debería llamarse así: operator=Adif;Renfe

En las estaciones de larga distancia tampoco se utiliza esa denominación: operator=Renfe;iryo;AVLO; SNCF Voyageurs;Quigo

saludos
Patrick
Robot8A (2026-04-07 18:09:33+00:00): Buenas, Patrick. En España la mayoría de estaciones son de Adif. En el caso de las estaciones de cercanías, estas son operadas por Renfe. No se interpreta de manera diferente que en Alemania.
En Alemania las estaciones son operadas por DB InfraGO, pero en España no todas son operadas por Adif. El BOE https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2006-1599 indica el convenio entre Adif y Renfe para que Renfe opere las estaciones de Cercanías. Esto no es lo mismo que operar todas las estaciones donde paran los trenes cercanías, no se están confundiendo conceptos. Por ejemplo, las principales estaciones de la ciudad central del núcleo siguen siendo operadas por Adif.
Como ha dicho Marino, esto se ve claramente en los carteles de la estación. Si los carteles son grises con una franja verde (ejemplo: commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Acceso_a_Madrid-Chamartín-Clara_Campoamor_desde_el_metro_2.jpg), el operador es Adif. Si no, no lo es (ejemplo de los carteles en una estación operada por Renfe: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:014_Estaci%C3%B3_de_Manresa_(Renfe).jpg, tiene el logo de Adif en el lado porque la estación sigue siendo de Adif, aunque no la opere). Renfe se encarga también de acometer mejoras y tiene el personal de la estación en las estaciones que opera.
En https://piservi.adif.es/piservi/map puedes clicar en cada estación y te indica el titular (owner=*) y el explotador (operator=*) de cada estación de la red ferroviaria de interés general.