piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Wildsharky (2026-02-23 09:51:23+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id 178925591
stasiu512 (2026-02-22 19:37:14+00:00): tourism=attraction na pasie granicznym? przecież tam droga z access=no prowadzi. co to za bzdury?
stasiu512 (2026-02-22 19:38:12+00:00): te miejsce jest już oznaczone - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7812460643
AndyB_66 (2026-02-22 19:38:49+00:00): Przestań wandalizować mapę. Znacznika "name" używamy tylko w wypadku oficjalnych nazw obiektów.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-23 07:24:10+00:00): @AndyB_66 - nie tylko oficjalnych

ale to musi być nazwa, nie opis
AndyB_66 (2026-02-23 12:29:59+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny - dokładnie to miałem na myśli :)
hahae (2026-02-23 01:56:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Toronto_Transit_Commission just to let you know, there is a page about TTC on osm wiki. If you can update the route status on the wiki page after your edit, it will be very helpful for other authors and future edits. Thanks. 

Best,
Hahae
poopqqq (2026-02-24 01:00:03+00:00): ok, so for routes that are finished I should do State Route|h=3|r=3 and the date to show that its finished?
poopqqq (2026-02-24 01:06:25+00:00): State Route h=3 r=3
hahae (2026-02-24 14:59:40+00:00): yeah, sure. you can just copy other lines and paste it, or you can also use the visual editor. Thank you!
bartgron (2026-02-22 21:00:57+00:00): A od kiedy to dodajemy tourism = attraction do Kościołów?
bartgron (2026-02-22 21:10:34+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany.
Pozdrawiam
MappingMore (2026-02-24 06:54:43+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:178973082
marc__marc (2026-02-25 13:56:42+00:00): Bonjour,
piste:grooming 	classic+skating
le caractère de séparation de valeur multiple est ";" et non "+"
Cordialement,
Marc
NeisBot (2026-02-22 20:09:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13591304104 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mortgage broker office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-03 05:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179284029
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-19 12:53:44+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184314787

https://osm.org/changeset/184314787
kylor (2026-02-22 20:36:26+00:00): good work! I would like to reccomend you square your buildings so they do not have an unusual shape, and you can do this by pressing q while having the building selected.
bobthebuilder423468 (2026-03-06 15:45:18+00:00): thank you finally a actually kind person
habi (2026-02-23 09:23:56+00:00): Ich hab' bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5177215 noch notiert, dass du das erledigt hast :)
captain_slow (2026-02-25 20:09:38+00:00): Oh, vielen Dank. Das ist mir irgendwie durch die Lappen gegangen :-)
Wildsharky (2026-02-23 09:56:21+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:178926230
felipeeugenio (2026-02-22 21:04:50+00:00): Hola. Por favor no usar nombres descriptivos. Saludos y gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178915239
Muokkaaja (2026-07-13 12:23:41+00:00): Liian monta duplikaattia, ei voi olla näin montaa pistettä samalla kohteella. Korsumäen auto.
maraf24 (2026-03-24 13:06:56+00:00): To nie jest kościół.
stasiu512 (2026-02-22 21:46:56+00:00): Cześć, zepsułeś geometrię budynku, zmianę poprawiłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178918105. Pozdrawiam
AndyB_66 (2026-02-23 12:32:30+00:00): Bitte beachten Sie die OSM-Regeln: osm.wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
SafwatHalaby (2026-02-22 22:34:10+00:00): שלום, המפה הציבורית לא מיועדת לשמירת מקומות אישיים
whitepanda (2026-02-24 03:42:31+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:178941562
MappingMore (2026-02-24 06:02:42+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:178971729
whitepanda (2026-02-24 03:41:42+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:178939626
A67-A67 (2026-02-24 20:36:50+00:00): De tag sport=fencing was correct. De waarde hoort in het Engels te zijn, dus fencing i.p.v. schermen.
9_tab (2026-04-01 22:38:46+00:00): addr:country in nodes like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321030967/history/4 would be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:addr:country=PL see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2nfa
Bartek444 (2026-04-02 16:46:53+00:00): poprawione
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180777760
NeisBot (2026-02-22 21:06:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13591420686 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Massage parlor"
---
Например, более нейтральная и фактическая версия вашего текста могла бы быть: "Салон массажа"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-03 05:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179284030
(No visible changes after review)
Wildsharky (2026-02-24 03:49:43+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:178929411
notmyproblem1 (2026-02-23 10:52:16+00:00): è presente una curva appena entri in galleria dalla rotonda (Via Lazzaro Spallanzani x Via Venti Settembre) 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=728454076654728&focus=photo

quindi mi sembra impossibile che sia dritta..
AndyB_66 (2026-02-26 21:26:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
stasiu512 (2026-02-22 21:37:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
stasiu512 (2026-02-22 21:37:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Sanniu (2026-02-24 10:39:56+00:00): hi, about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13591456717 - there is no אצ''ל street around.
If there is one, can you map it?
weblogdryads (2026-06-29 18:57:38+00:00): many of these buildings are rectangles instead of accurate traces
crindler (2026-06-30 03:31:30+00:00): it was a rough first pass; house locations are accurate, even if their shape is a rough estimation. gives a good macro overview of the neighbourhood
Jalal Kh (2026-02-23 23:18:35+00:00): Please ignore this change I did  it by mistake
Wildsharky (2026-02-23 10:00:57+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:178927448
Wildsharky (2026-02-24 03:48:32+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:178939030
NeisBot (2026-02-22 22:15:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 13 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1013226608 v23 | 13 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178918806
twingall1 (2026-02-22 22:38:51+00:00): I added the short section of footpath that i know to exist. The map is now improved
DaveF (2026-02-23 07:52:34+00:00): You've connected the East end of the path to the Cotswold's relation, not the road.
You've not indicated how the path passes through the hedgerows (barrier=*),

Are you sure the Western end doesn't meet the bridlepath, not the road?

What signage is there? if it's a PROW add these tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom#Public_Rights_of_Way
twingall1 (2026-02-23 08:15:46+00:00): Each hedge cross is a wooden stile. Yes i'm sure the western end joind the road not the bridlepath (in disagreement with the OS map i know). There is a black signpost with a yellow walking figure and yellow arrow by the gatepost of the large metal gate that joins the road at western end.  Similar sign at eastern end where it joins the road there. I will make the edits you in due time when i figure out how (new to this site)
DaveF (2026-02-23 08:56:20+00:00): Thanks for the prompt reply
This may help:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
NuevaG-Digital (2026-02-22 22:30:48+00:00): good
NeisBot (2026-02-22 22:36:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/4464961807 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fotóstúdió"

#MapWithoutSpam
qstep (2026-02-28 18:00:16+00:00): Üdv az OpenStreetMap-en!

Szerkesztésedben az épület házszámára raktad a vállalkozásod. Átraktam saját POI-ra mind itt, mind Bécsben, valamint a reklám jellegű tartalmat töröltem, az OSM-ben nem tárolunk ilyet, azok elérhetők a mellékelt weboldalon. Lásd SEO spam: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Viszont megadhatod a többi elérhetőséged mindkét ponton contact:*=* címkékkel, és a hitelesség jegyében felviheted a vállalkozásod nevét (operator), székhelyét (operator:addr), adószámát (ref:HU:vatin), cégjegyzékszámát (ref:HU:company) is. Egy példa erre: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13601415501
NeisBot (2026-02-22 22:42:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/470369497 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Photo studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
qstep (2026-02-28 18:01:37+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179181056
whitepanda (2026-02-24 03:43:53+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 178940460
porfiriopaiz (2026-02-26 22:48:20+00:00): Hola NuevaG-Digital.

Muchas gracias por tus contribuciones, te saluda Porfirio Páiz.

¿Me gustaría confirmar si la estructura que estaba representada por estos elementos ha sido demolida y no existe más? ya que esa sería la única razón válida para borrar el elemento que aquí se encontraba.

De lo contrario, sería bueno regresar este elemento nuevamente al mapa si es que aún existe la estructura física que este representaba.

Saludos y gracias por tus contribuciones.

Porfirio Páiz
porfiriopaiz (2026-02-26 22:47:23+00:00): Hola NuevaG-Digital.

Muchas gracias por tus contribuciones, te saluda Porfirio Páiz.

¿Me gustaría confirmar si la estructura que estaba representada por estos elementos ha sido demolida y no existe más? ya que esa sería la única razón válida para  borrar el elemento que aquí se encontraba.

De lo contrario, sería bueno regresar este elemento nuevamente al mapa si es que aún existe la estructura física que este representaba.

Saludos y gracias por tus contribuciones.

Porfirio Páiz
BrummsLee (2026-05-16 10:48:09+00:00): Hello!
Quote: "Spelling entirely in uppercase letters not allowed."
This statement is incorrect. In OSM, names are recorded exactly as they appear on the business or on signs.
Comino (2026-05-16 20:18:56+00:00): According to OSM's official guidelines

- Names should be adapted to local capitalisation rules — title case is generally preferred
- Stylized spellings in ALL CAPS should be normalized — for example, a sign that reads "TACO BELL" should be written as name=Taco Bell (normal case, not all caps)
- The only exception is when changing the capitalisation would cause confusion or when the original spelling is much more common in everyday usage

So while OSM follows the "on the ground" principle (using names as they appear on signs), this specifically does not apply to stylized uppercase spellings — those should be converted to normal capitalisation according to local language rules.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions
BrummsLee (2026-05-17 11:05:14+00:00): Ah, okay. You never stop learning... especially in the field of OSM.
Could you please send me the link to this note?  Thanks!
ajmat (2026-02-23 11:43:58+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 178939428
ajmat (2026-02-23 10:51:25+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 178929990
Wildsharky (2026-02-23 09:58:20+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 178926341
stasiu512 (2026-02-23 00:28:47+00:00): charge:coditional do charge*
MappingMore (2026-02-25 16:07:34+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179044343
whitepanda (2026-02-23 11:43:14+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 178939368
MappingMore (2026-02-23 11:58:14+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:178940179
Wildsharky (2026-02-23 09:55:00+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:178925799
Udarian (2026-02-23 01:42:03+00:00): After looking through some of these it seems like a decent amount of these are duplicates of some form of already mapped features. Can you please look back through this changeset and fix the duplicates. 

Happy Mapping,
Udar.
NeisBot (2026-02-23 01:06:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 20 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/261722152 v5 | 11 crossings
https://osm.org/way/261722127 v4 | 9 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2673196587 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178922176
NeisReview (2026-03-03 05:33:07+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/179022979
juicyarp (2026-05-30 09:14:39+00:00): El CORPES no regula la toponimia en español ni puede usarse como base para intentar imponer la forma en valenciano. Estos topónimos en español sólo han dejado de ser oficiales pero siguen en uso activo hoy en día, por lo que no es justificable intentar eliminarlos y supone POV pushing.
Jordi MF (2026-05-30 09:48:25+00:00): La RAE afirma que en los "topónimos cuya forma tradicional en español ha caído en desuso en favor de la forma local, se da primacía a la forma local" (https://www.rae.es/dpd/ayuda/tratamiento-de-los-toponimos).

La misma RAE ofrece la herramienta CORPES y afirma que "pretende ser una muestra razonablemente representativa y equilibrada del español del siglo XXI". Por lo tanto, se trata de una herramienta que permite saber qué formas son más frecuentes en textos en español.

Y por último, las formas que actualmente están perdiendo peso en textos formales en español no se pierden. Existen etiquetas (old_name:es=*) que permiten mantener esa información en la base de datos.
masoudghorbani (2026-02-23 03:26:23+00:00): دیدی دستکاری در ویرایش دیگران چقدر میتونه راحت باشه، و ناراحت کننده و وقت گیر
من تمایلی به ادامه این کار ندارم، فقط خواستم ببینی بقیه هم میتونن همون کار را انجام بدن
شما چون یه چند سالی در حال ویرایش هستی یه احساس صاحب گونه و حق آب و گل داشتن پیدا کردی، که اشتباهه
آدمی که دوستدار امام حسین ع هست به نظرم نباید لجبازی سرلوحه کاراش باشه
felipeeugenio (2026-02-23 14:31:40+00:00): Hola. No hay un cartel que dice "Callejón" justo afuera? recuerdo que alguien mencionó esto una vez en el chat. Eso primaría sobre el plan regulador. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178923726
NeisBot (2026-02-23 03:16:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13591852404 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Backwater area"
---
Misalnya, versi teks yang lebih netral dan faktual bisa jadi: "Daerah pedalaman"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-03 05:33:05+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179284031
(No visible changes after review)
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 09:56:16+00:00): Branch naming conflicts with OSM tagging guidelines. Awaiting DWG review.
NeisBot (2026-02-23 03:24:39+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1482092561 v1 | 8 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=178924138
ajmat (2026-02-24 11:45:04+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 178983384
❤️‍🔥 (2026-02-25 08:52:44+00:00): another tip: after drawing an area, you can press Q on your keyboard to 'square' the building, so that it's a proper rectangle shape
pwbriggs (2026-02-25 19:39:45+00:00): Thanks. I left a message on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162981658 asking about those.
kingkingHK (2026-02-23 11:57:15+00:00): What? Personal bookmark?
Slavyanin50 (2026-02-23 12:01:24+00:00): No. This trail for maintenance. It's marked on that point. In fact this is terrible trail. Not for normal hiking.
kingkingHK (2026-02-23 13:27:17+00:00): Well, you've said it: it's a TRAIL for maintenance, so not no trail. Things can have purposes other than hiking. `access=private` is sufficient. And this is obviously not `tourism=attraction` anyway.
Slavyanin50 (2026-02-23 13:46:32+00:00): The entrance is for maintenance only. Further on, there's a trail that's practically nonexistent. Just rocks. Beyond the rocks, there's bushes. Any trekker will regret ever setting foot on the trail from here. There's a much more convenient entrance to the trail.
kingkingHK (2026-02-23 14:00:16+00:00): There's `access=private` for maintenance only, and `trail_visibility=no`
kingkingHK (2026-02-23 14:00:57+00:00): And still you should have used something like notes instead of adding a fictional POI.
Kovoschiz (2026-02-24 11:43:40+00:00): 1. This is self-contradictory to use `tourism=attraction` 
2. There's not one "the trail". There can be many routes, where others are free to climb or cut through.
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-23 09:57:00+00:00): Branch naming conflicts with OSM tagging guidelines. Awaiting DWG review.
NeisBot (2026-02-23 05:09:47+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13591947151 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Hair salon"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-03 05:33:06+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/179260495
silversurfer83 (2026-02-23 19:31:07+00:00): Hi there,

was this meant to be upoaded to OSM?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178926422
therealzakie (2026-03-03 21:33:03+00:00): why does the map go up to the most northern point O-O
sanchi (2026-02-23 20:29:18+00:00): Hola
Revierto este conjunto de cambios. Si existe un carril central de acceso a la gasolinera.
Kaduna (2026-02-25 06:46:53+00:00): Hi sanchi, 
Thank you for reverting the changeset. I mistakenly deleted the link, and I understand the connectivity based on the road markings. I will be more aware of this in similar situations.
NeisBot (2026-02-23 06:16:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (8 changesets) shows that 308 of your last 344 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23778572
woodpeck (2026-02-23 08:59:31+00:00): Hello Yaw That and welcome to OSM. In this changeset you have not only added new buildings, you have also deleted a lot of old ones. The next time you do that, please make sure this is reflected in your changeset comment (e.g. "added new buildings; deleted buildings that were not visible on imagery"). If you encounter *lots* of spurious buildings then it can also make sense to do some research and try to find out based on what sources the were added (in this case, apparently a project identifying itself as "#hotosm-project-2707 #missingmaps #redcross #mapgive") and double-check if your sources are newer (in this case the building data you deleted was 8 years old so likely outdated indeed).

Also, when you add buildings that intersect with other existing features, think about if the situation might warrant correction. You have added the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1482114700 which lies partly in, partly outside the residential area  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1333771581 - maybe this would have been an opportunity to extend the residential area polygon.
Wanderer2000 (2026-02-23 11:36:57+00:00): Nee, dit is zeker geen gras. Ik heb het teruggezet naar shrubbery.
Kovoschiz (2026-02-24 11:42:09+00:00): 1. Unprefixed `website=` is used for unique pages of the feature specifically, eg branches, where `brand:website=` will be used for domain of brands 
2. Almost all roads don't have `website=` 
3. This is for the project, not the road when opened 
4. This is already attempted as `project:website=`
5. Most of the `landuse=construction` refer to Lion Rock Tunnel Rd, Tai Chung Kiu Rd, and the intersection
Bienson (2026-02-23 17:48:11+00:00): Gleichzeitig shop=bakery und disused:shop=yes?