piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kapazao (2026-03-11 17:21:06+00:00): Hola, suelo ir revisando estas importaciones algo después en Osmose y tal para ver si salen errores y acababa de verlo. Ya lo he corregido.
Algunas veces pasa que se cuela alguna cosa, pero gracias por avisar.
Un saludo
Perpignan Méditerranée Toursime - DATA V (2026-03-10 13:02:17+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour cette modification.
Perpignan Méditerranée Tourisme - OT Torreilles (2026-03-10 13:05:08+00:00): Avec plaisir ! :-)
MappingMore (2026-03-15 01:53:55+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:179881185
Vinber-Pro (2026-03-10 12:55:30+00:00): Bonjour,
de quoi as-tu changé le nom ?

bonne carto et merci
Perpignan Méditerranée Tourisme - OSA (2026-03-10 13:00:40+00:00): Bonjour,
Il y a eu un changement de propriétaire et de nom.
Cordialement.
Vinber-Pro (2026-03-10 18:54:42+00:00): merci :)
A67-A67 (2026-03-10 23:25:03+00:00): De Westersingel is geen stadsgracht, naar een 19e eeuwse singel, die vooral diende voor de toevoer en afvoer van water. De westelijke stadsgracht is de inmiddels gedempte Coolsingel.
GrassWarrior (2026-03-10 23:30:26+00:00): Dank voor de verduidelijking, ik was iets te snel gegaan hiermee dan!
MappingMore (2026-03-11 10:14:29+00:00): Revert of 179610051
Wildsharky (2026-03-13 06:08:33+00:00): Revert of 179610293
Wildsharky (2026-03-13 06:09:28+00:00): Revert of 179610315
Wildsharky (2026-03-13 06:12:55+00:00): Revert of 179610297
Taya_S (2026-03-13 06:31:16+00:00): All the reverts are already listed in the revert:id field
MappingMore (2026-05-28 09:47:33+00:00): Hi  Taya_S,
Thank you for reaching out, I will not add same info on changeset discussion, if this information is already available in changeset details.

Thank you!
Bastianowitz (2026-03-11 11:13:40+00:00): ich hoffe die Notiz "während der Baumaßnahme nicht in betrieb" beschreibt es am besten Kollege :D
Sebastian St (2026-03-11 11:20:01+00:00): Sollte so passen :)
iandees (2026-03-10 13:43:25+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
NeisBot (2026-03-10 11:56:12+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (5 changesets) shows that 313 of your last 378 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23898286
Wildsharky (2026-03-13 08:43:26+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179730182
NeisBot (2026-03-10 12:01:01+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13633715593 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "IT office"
---
Zum Beispiel könnte eine neutralere und sachlichere Version deines Textes lauten: "IT-Büro"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-18 17:33:07+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179636793
Bienson (2026-03-11 04:48:31+00:00): Und weiterhin surface=metal bei Zäunen ... und auch nicht verbunden mit Weg und Tor
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-11 18:06:45+00:00): ist erledigt.
eggie (2026-03-10 12:29:53+00:00): Dag Evgri  Het is niet correct om hier de wegklasse aan te passen.
Dat klopt dan niet met de aansluitende wegen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-03-10 12:31:04+00:00): Wegklasse teruggezet
Evgri (2026-03-10 12:35:47+00:00): Oke. Ik ga me even inlezen. Dank voor de check!
eggie (2026-03-10 12:42:47+00:00): De wegklasse staat los van of iets in buiten de bebouwde kom ligt. Het is gecompliceerd.
Nederlandse wiki wegentagging
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:The_Netherlands_roads_tagging

En
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Kaartelementen#Wegen_2
eggie (2026-03-10 13:02:27+00:00): Het fietspad heb ik van construction gehaald
AndyB_66 (2026-04-23 14:19:53+00:00): Stosuj się, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
nevw (2026-03-14 04:36:40+00:00): Hi, I fixed a problem detected by osmi with Upper Goulburn State Forest where two polygons crossed due to simplification of the dataset and I fixed that. 
I also noticed that the gaps between the polygons here are also part of the State Forest.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-37.560374/146.239078
nevw (2026-03-14 09:07:16+00:00): I think this is not a problem as bits like this seem to come and go in datasets
gscholz (2026-03-11 08:47:25+00:00): Hi Lola,
you still seem to assemble relations into collections and adding other errors as well:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.97306&lat=44.54879&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17602382/history#map=17/44.557031/11.953994

Please stop doing this. Keep things smart and maintainable; this will also help you to avoid making errors (I just fixed one of them).
Guido
Lola Fox (2026-03-11 19:38:30+00:00): You already told me this many and many times. I KNOW IT PERFECTLY. This time is happened that a old area was incomplete and with some lines without any relation (so white line). Completing the, some errorers are occoursed. Me too have  Geofrabrik so I check there for errors. Yesterday was all fine. This evening I could verify but you are anticipated me.
Lola Fox (2026-03-11 19:47:59+00:00): I've checked: tehre is any relation into collection here. Where is the problem exactly? Why don't you intervene in this relation, damaged from many days? https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=12.54164&lat=45.50904&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

And this ? Since many days is broken. So? https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=13.75175&lat=45.50840&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

In the area where I make mapping I can provide to correct the errors myself by Geofabrik. I perfectly understand the rules.
Sylabowy Kot (2026-03-10 21:00:52+00:00): Witaj w OSM.
Twoja zmiana miała by sens, gdyby dodano te informacje na główny budynek bliżej Poligonowej - to tam wedle mojej wiedzy znajduje się główne wejście do kompleksu. Nie bez powodu ten budynek ma wyglądać najlepiej. Zduplikowany został adres i nazwa zakładu, nie dodając nic nowego. Jeśli się nie mylę, to zachęcam powtórzyć zmianę na wskazanym przeze mnie budynku, dodając tag office=company. Może są inne informacje, którymi można uzupełnić OSM. Oczywiście należy pamiętać, żeby nie złamać tajemnicy przedsiębiorstwa. W związku z powyższym wycofałem zmianę.
Sylabowy Kot (2026-03-11 19:24:48+00:00): Dokonałem zmiany, o której wspomniałem. Powinniście mieć już w porządku.
Bienson (2026-03-11 04:53:10+00:00): Sind hier zwei verschiedene Müllumladestationen und eine kleine Straßenfläche, die keine Müllumladestation ist, aber öffentlich von Fußgängern begehbar ist?
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-11 18:13:25+00:00): Die obere Fläche liegt höher als die untere Fläche, sodass man direkt in einen 20 m³ Container kippen kann. Die Flächen sind nun verbunden.
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-11 18:13:51+00:00): Von Fußgängern nicht begehbar. Deshalb die Tore.
soliMM (2026-03-10 14:02:42+00:00): Zdravo, dobra praksa je da se ostavlja changeset komentar kada se izvrši upload izmjena na OSM, takođe unosi se i izvor koji ste tom prilikom koristili. 

Komentar bi trebalo da opiše ukratko šta ste uradili ili koje ste izmjene napravili. Što se tiče izvora, ako ste ucrtavali objekte putem ortofoto snimka onda navedite u polju 'Source' koji ste koristili, npr. Bing, Esri, Mapbox...

Evo link ka nekoliko primjera https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Srdačan pozdrav
Bienson (2026-03-11 04:54:11+00:00): Unsinniges access-Tag an Mauern.
Bienson (2026-03-11 04:54:57+00:00): Access-Tags widersprüchlich bei Fläche und Zufahrtsweg
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-11 18:18:17+00:00): Tag bei Zufahrtswegen gelöscht.
Für Flächen belassen, da nicht öffentlich.
Bienson (2026-03-11 04:55:31+00:00): Access-Tags widersprüchlich bei Fläche und Zufahrtsweg
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-11 18:22:01+00:00): korrigiert.
nevw (2026-03-10 13:07:55+00:00): You appear to be adding quite a few businesses with ‘owner’ in the name. Please check the osm wiki for correct syntax and key case as nearly all your edits need quite a bit of correcting.
Bienson (2026-03-11 04:56:14+00:00): Unsinniges Multipolygon
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-11 18:27:50+00:00): Fläche neu angelegt.
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-03-10 12:58:59+00:00): Relation này tôi đã tạo ra nhưng bị vô tình thêm tag highway khiến hệ thống của OSM tưởng rằng relation này là đường và gây lỗi hiển thị nên tôi xoá tag highway đi để khắc phục lỗi
Romwriter (2026-03-11 17:58:10+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Bienson (2026-03-11 04:56:55+00:00): Access-Tags widersprüchlich bei Fläche und Zufahrtsweg
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-11 18:31:44+00:00): korrigiert.
Bienson (2026-03-11 04:57:39+00:00): Ist aber offensichtlich wohl öffentlich zugänglich für Fußgänger?
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-11 18:36:41+00:00): Tag auf Grundstückszufahrt geändert und Flächen korrigiert.
Bienson (2026-03-11 04:58:11+00:00): Unsinniges Multipolygon
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-11 18:43:36+00:00): neu angelegt.
ajmat (2026-03-12 03:53:53+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 179730173
iandees (2026-03-10 13:43:59+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
Supaplex (2026-03-10 14:17:00+00:00): I though I fix it
iandees (2026-03-10 14:19:16+00:00): You did! This is a mistake on my side, apologies. I'll fix it.
iandees (2026-03-10 13:44:08+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
Supaplex (2026-03-10 14:22:27+00:00): I thought I fix it, so might mis-configure something
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179638320
Bienson (2026-03-11 04:59:18+00:00): Unsinniges Multipolygon
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-11 18:45:41+00:00): wo liegt das Problem? die Flächen sind doch verbunden?
Bienson (2026-03-11 05:00:11+00:00): Unsinniges Multipolygon
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-11 18:52:33+00:00): ist neu angelegt.
Bienson (2026-03-11 05:01:31+00:00): Access-Tags widersprüchlich bei Fläche und Zufahrtsweg
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:06:05+00:00): Why did you detach two connected buildings?
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:43:19+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:06:48+00:00): They are obviously not stacked on each other. Fix the geometry only.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:43:53+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
Bienson (2026-03-11 05:03:00+00:00): Access-Tags widersprüchlich bei Fläche und Zufahrtsweg
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:07:46+00:00): They are obviously on the same level.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:44:09+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:08:12+00:00): Are they not connected?
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:44:28+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
eggie (2026-03-10 14:09:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:08:42+00:00): Are they not connected?
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:44:42+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
habi (2026-03-11 09:19:15+00:00): Ciao ElectricalGala

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Danke fürs Anpassen des geschlossenem Laden zum VOI, ich wollte das am Freitag erledigen, wenn das VOI eröffnet :)

Ä Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi

PS: Bei irgendwelchen Fragen gerne hier in den Kommentaren nachhaken oder bei https://c.osm.org/c/107 eine Diskussion eröffnen, wir versuchen gerne zu helfen
Bienson (2026-03-11 05:04:07+00:00): Unsinniges Multipolygon
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-11 19:07:10+00:00): korrigiert.
zuradv (2026-03-11 09:35:33+00:00): That site is not a source. This place is currently being planned.
yelisey90 (2026-03-11 17:34:19+00:00): https://maps.gov.ge/map/portal is the official source for street names. To view them, in the left menu select სამისამართო >
სამისამართო მონაცემები . Only is cases when there are street signs that are newer than the information in the cadastre, should the names from those street signs be used.

Do you have a photo of a street sign with such a name?
Bienson (2026-03-11 05:04:55+00:00): Unsinniges Multipolygon
Bienson (2026-03-12 02:10:00+00:00): Gesamter Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56221963/ ist für niemanden öffentlich zugänglich?
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 18:19:40+00:00): Please use `building=` , not `landuse=`
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 18:19:52+00:00): + `location=underground`
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 19:55:11+00:00): HK commonly has `highway=` roads passing through `building=`
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 19:56:44+00:00): Wrong comment: You should simply move the `=service` road, and not delete other `highway=`
Bienson (2026-03-11 05:06:05+00:00): Unsinniges Multipolygon
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 19:54:25+00:00): HK commonly has `highway=` roads passing through `building=`
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 19:43:41+00:00): Why move the `building=` ?
eggie (2026-03-10 14:11:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Bienson (2026-03-11 05:07:08+00:00): Unsinniges Multipolygon
mueschel (2026-03-13 14:20:34+00:00): Hi,
could you check these parkings? Many got a misspelled "Cbicycle_parking" tag.
pierre_geovelo (2026-03-13 14:33:08+00:00): Hi, mistake has been corrected, thank you
mueschel (2026-03-17 14:36:43+00:00): The wrong tags are still there:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22Cbicycle_parking%22%3D*+global&R
Bienson (2026-03-11 05:08:38+00:00): Und weiterhin ist surface=metal falsch
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-11 19:21:20+00:00): korrigiert.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 19:40:58+00:00): Why delete the `=service` road?
Bienson (2026-03-11 05:09:34+00:00): access=private überlagert vehicle=private - ist somit nicht nötig (aber nicht falsch).
Supaplex (2026-03-10 14:32:58+00:00): You might have to revert back because I already fix it.
If you are a bot, you should revert the previous dragged node
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179640188
iandees (2026-03-10 14:40:43+00:00): It should be fixed. I'm not a bot, but the detection piece is automated.
Bienson (2026-03-11 05:10:18+00:00): Unsinniges Multipolygon
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-11 19:40:11+00:00): habe ich wieder gelöscht, da der Name den Namen Trauerhallen Kemminghausen im friedhofsplan unterdrückt.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:10:24+00:00): Obviously wrong. Split and use `tunnel=building_passage`.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:44:54+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
Bienson (2026-03-11 05:10:52+00:00): Unsinniges Multipolygon
impiaaa (2026-03-10 17:04:05+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! Remember that when drawing buildings, you can press "Q" or right-click and select "Square" to make a building perfectly rectangular. Also, street names in OSM should have their suffixes spelled out, instead of abbreviated, so "Terrace" instead of "Terr."
Bienson (2026-03-11 05:11:17+00:00): Unsinniges Multipolygon
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:10:49+00:00): Obviously wrong.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:45:25+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
pitscheplatsch (2026-03-13 18:03:10+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179642433
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 19:39:16+00:00): Why deleting `highway=` and `building=` + `addr:housenumber=` ?
kingkingHK (2026-03-10 14:27:44+00:00): THIS IS OBVIOUSLY WRONG, SPLIT AND USE `TUNNEL=BUILDING_PASSAGE`!!!!!!1
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:41:31+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
scrambling_panda (2026-04-16 18:19:12+00:00): FYI: I’ve deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13634041195 added in this changeset because it was a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12997845482
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 19:26:49+00:00): There's no need to move both `highway=` roads and `building=`
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 19:21:09+00:00): Very obvious mistake of mistakenly attaching vertex. Don't delete details, and changing to simplistic shapes.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 19:19:07+00:00): Why deleting the details, and changing it to right-angled corners?
MihaelIvanjek (2026-03-11 12:28:30+00:00): Accidentally created node deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179697293 #OptimoRoute
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 19:17:19+00:00): N-th deleting `building=` without even changing to `building:part=`
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-23 06:35:21+00:00): A czy w TPN nie ma czasem zakazu chodzenia poza wyznakowanymi szlakami?
Przemysław Borys (2026-03-23 06:51:02+00:00): Latem tak. Zimą jest dozwolone zbaczanie ze szlaku w zakresie niezbędnym do zarządzania ryzykiem lawinowym (jak trzeba mogę poszukać konkretnego paragrafu regulaminu).
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-23 08:50:25+00:00): o, to jak będziesz robił wątek na forum to warto wspomnieć by ludzie nie byli zdziwieni (dopiero co ktoś w GPN kasował wszystkie ścieżki podając to jako argument)
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:24:26+00:00): Are they not connected?
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:46:55+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
Vinber-Pro (2026-03-10 14:19:27+00:00): en fait c'est la création de l'entité CapSud 66, le commentaire a été ajouté dans la description
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 19:16:26+00:00): Why are you touching `tunnel=yes` + `layer=-1`, and what does this do?
kingkingHK (2026-03-10 14:22:23+00:00): This is obviously wrong. It's above, not below the podium.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:39:44+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:12:40+00:00): Why did you delete the road? Simply fix its geometry.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:45:40+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-10 14:23:14+00:00): This is obviously wrong. It's a `tunnel=building_passage`. You should have split the way too.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:40:12+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 19:13:06+00:00): 1. Roads passing through buildings common situation
2. You simply moved it outside the `landuse=residential` again to other side
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:17:28+00:00): Are they not connected?
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:46:17+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
jbcharron (2026-03-10 18:20:32+00:00): Bonsoir,
Je crois qu'il y a petit soucis dans vos modifs avec le tag bicycle_parking qui dans certains cas est sous la forme Cbicycle_parking (je l'ai vu sur plusieurs changes)
Bonne soirée
Jean-Baptiste
jbcharron (2026-03-17 19:37:45+00:00): Petite relance pour que vous puissiez corriger rapidement 😉
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 09:42:40+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-10 14:23:53+00:00): This is obviously wrong. Move them to the correct place.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:40:37+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-10 14:24:28+00:00): This is obviously wrong. Split the ways and tag `building=tunnel_passage`.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:40:53+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:56:42+00:00): I don't even know what you are doing. What building issue did you fix?
kingkingHK (2026-03-12 12:36:10+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179755086 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
kingkingHK (2026-03-10 14:24:57+00:00): This is obviously wrong. Align the buildings and roads. If you can't, then don't.
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:41:14+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 19:02:09+00:00): Why are you moving the `building=` , but then delete the `=service` road?
kingkingHK (2026-03-11 03:23:50+00:00): Are they not connected?
kingkingHK (2026-03-13 02:46:40+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179704803 , manual review and repair will be done later if needed.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 18:59:40+00:00): Why are you deleting a unique `addr:housenumber=` ?
Langlaeufer (2026-03-11 09:26:11+00:00): Ist das Radfahren durch Schild in Gegenrichtung freigegeben?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179641856
bartgron (2026-03-10 21:07:11+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany. Proszę o zapoznanie się z zasadami dodawania firm do map OSM:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/chce-dodac-swoja-firme-do-mapy-w-osm-watek-ogolny/135487
Pozdrawiam serdecznie
kingkingHK (2026-03-10 14:26:59+00:00): This is obviously wrong, the buildings are not there. Be aware of imagery distortion.
Kovoschiz (2026-03-10 18:55:31+00:00): 2. Buildings overhanging roads are common