piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nurdafur (2025-08-19 10:20:12+00:00): Hallo
Du hast in diesem Changeset auch Wegweiser zugefügt. Mindestens einer davon, an dem ich auch vorbeigeradelt bin, ist eigentlich ein route_marker und für Fahrräder. Da sollte also noch bicycle=yes dazu. Bei dem einen habe ich es geändert. Vielleicht hast du ja mal Zeit, die anderen zu prüfen.
Hier ein Mapillary-Bild davon:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=49.0963382855727&lng=8.651752785031363&z=19.199224093855246&dateFrom=2024-01-01&pKey=1581334436614643&focus=photo&x=0.012658929446895062&y=0.6637274885714247&zoom=0.3161100303401132
Wegweiser ist es nur dann, wenn da auch ein Ziel steht.
Hier noch der Link zum Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Droute_marker

Liebe Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Kartographieren.
mavl (2025-08-09 16:12:25+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет улицу "Эрвье 30к4".  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13058606673  
  
addr:street=Эрвье 30к4  
  
В Тюмени такой улицы нет. Есть "улица Эрвье", а "30к4" - это номер дома. Должно быть:  
  
addr:street=улица Эрвье  
addr:housenumber=30к4  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0
rempshaener (2025-08-11 19:40:28+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap,
zu dieser Anpassung habe ich folgende Anmerkungen:
- Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.
- Statt "wasserleitung" müsste es "main" heißen.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
Grass-snake (2025-08-09 10:29:52+00:00): Здравствуйте, для Вас принципиально использовать именно такую последовательность слов?
Советская улица → улица Советская
Спортивная улица → улица Спортивная
Заречная улица → улица Заречная
Печенгская улица → улица Печенгская
Подгорная улица → улица Подгорная
Полевая улица → улица Полевая
Хибинский переулок → переулок Хибинский
Прибрежная дорога → дорога Прибрежная
Я бы хотел вернуть эти названия обратно.
michael60634 (2025-08-09 16:32:22+00:00): Я использовал нормальную последовательность слов, и это важно для единообразия. Если, согласно дорожным знакам, это неверно, то, конечно, мои изменения следует исправить.
eggie (2025-08-08 20:34:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Je info heb ik overgezet naar de bestaande adresnode.  Beter niet op de gebouwen zelf bijtaggen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
NL66278 (2025-08-08 22:24:25+00:00): Maar ik zie de door mij toegevoegde informatie nu nergens meer. Voor mij onduidelijk hoe ik dingen toe kan voegen aan een adres in plaats van aan een gebouw.
eggie (2025-08-09 04:05:27+00:00): Hoi...

Van Die staat nu op de al bestaande adresnode.
Even je cache leegmaken. Ctrl-F5 een paar keer. Dan zie je effect.
Je kunt het beste in zo n geval de adresnode selecteren en daar op aanvullen in het vervolg.

Je hoeft geen adressen aan te maken... die zijn er al.

Probeer maar eens een andere winkel of restaurant. Zal vast lukken.
Succes..
eggie
eggie (2025-08-09 06:45:06+00:00): Zie ook https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/beginner/id-editor/
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-28 12:28:56+00:00): What you meant by name "el Pico: 300m SNM" ?
Marcos Dione (2025-08-31 09:02:11+00:00): Sorry, OsmAnd created a fixme node instead of a note ??? SNM is AMSL, above mean sea level in Spanish. Fixed, thanks for the heads up :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-31 14:44:57+00:00): EveryDoor - see https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/880
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-08 20:31:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12230392388
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1421030920

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Barroszt (2025-08-08 20:58:28+00:00): naprawione
jorchr (2025-08-10 18:43:06+00:00): This change set is incorrect and needs to be fixed or reverted.
Hidoo00 (2025-08-10 19:20:13+00:00): What's wrong with it?
jorchr (2025-08-10 23:08:51+00:00): Corner where Skomakaregatan meets Lilla Torg has been dragged  across the street.
Hidoo00 (2025-08-11 03:46:17+00:00): Jeez, you couldv'e just told me 😅
Fixed!
jorchr (2025-08-11 05:05:47+00:00): Sorry about that, I thought it was obvious. Maybe I should have given this link: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=13.00372&lat=55.60710&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
tkk (2025-08-28 09:42:52+00:00): Ahoj, chtel bych se zeptat na upravu rozcestniku Knizeci cesta (uzel 1416923261) - dal jsi disused na information, ale zbytek zustal, vcetne relaci - co by to melo byt - rozcestnik uz tam neni, nebo je ale obe trasy vedou jinudy nebo jaky je stav na miste? Diky tom.k
Nemo02 (2025-08-28 13:18:04+00:00): Ahoj, celá oblast kolem Boubínského pralesa je uzavřena (nebezpečí pádu stromů) a pár let ještě asi bude (bezzásahové území). Dostat se dá jen od Zátoně k jezírku a po náhradní modré trase k timu Na Křížkách. Takže ani netuším, jak to u něj vypadá a nechtěl jsem být příliš agresivní.
Úplně jsem zapomněl na naučnou stezkou, ta je taky mimo provoz.
tkk (2025-08-28 13:32:46+00:00): OK, pak by to chtelo vetsi uklid - udelas to nebo to mam zkusit nejak provest? Ty rozcestniky bude chtit disuse minimalne jeste tourism=information, jinak to porad sviti jako funkcni ale divny rozcestnik.
Nemo02 (2025-08-28 13:38:14+00:00): Uklidím to, bude třeba zhasnout i tu NS. Nemo02
tkk (2025-08-28 13:40:24+00:00): OK, diky moc.
gurglypipe (2025-08-12 09:28:18+00:00): I’m not sure this is the right tagging, although the topic is a bit fraught. I think these lights are like the ones at Bolton-le-Sands (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10956035839). The crossing is _traffic_ light controlled, in that it’s basically only safe for pedestrians to cross when the traffic lights go red. But there are no _pedestrian_ lights.

So I think this should be crossing=traffic_signals (note ‘traffic’, not ’pedestrian’), but with button_operated=no and crossing:signals=shared.

Unfortunately the wiki doesn’t have an example specifically like this one. The nearest it has is the fifth example on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:signals#Examples

Let me know your thoughts! :)
Dezza (2025-08-12 11:47:58+00:00): Hello, I've just been re-reading the wiki and yes I think you might be right, although there is some extra nuance here.

Mapillary image here -
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.05268786118398&lng=-2.7961026701102583&z=18.002058557365068&pKey=169029318452074&focus=photo

Interestingly the crossing is only marked on the exit from Parliament Street, and not the entrance (i.e. only across the bus lane). I think this may be because it is only this half that has a phase where the pedestrians can cross (to the island) while protected by lights.

There are (from memory) 3 phases at these lights.
1. Cable Street -> Parliament Street both directions, ahead-only, + pedestrian crossing Bulk Road
2. Cable Street -> Parliament Street (NE direction only) + Bulk Road -> Parliament Street left turn only.
3. Bulk Road -> all directions

All of these phases permit traffic to enter Parliament Street and conflict with pedestrians crossing - probably the reason for no markings on the NE-bound lane, and no signals.

Does that change how we tag it? Example 5 on the wiki certainly fits for the bus-lane. But the general traffic lane in the opposite direction is possibly just a standard unmarked crossing like you would get at any uncontrolled junction. However is that any different to example 5? Presumably there traffic can still turn into the junction and conflict with pedestrians - just have to give them priority?

As an aside, I think the labelling of Cable Street vs Parliament street is wrong - I think the area NE of the junction is all Parliament Street (you can see the sign on the mapillary image on the left hand wall under the green arrow), on the other side we can't use them as a source but MARIO and Google Maps both agree on a name while OSM has one side Cable Street and the other side Parliament Street!

My suggestion would be to tag as per your suggestion for the bus-lane side, but the other side I'm less sure. I don't object to apply your suggestions to both sides (possibly with different crossing:markings=*).

How does that sound?
Dezza (2025-08-12 11:53:11+00:00): I guess there's also the unmarked crossing of Greyhound Bridge Road to the NW of the lights. Is that fundamentally different to the crossing across NE-bound Parliament Street? The only difference is that there are 2 phases when a pedestrian can cross here without conflict
gurglypipe (2025-08-12 13:45:58+00:00): > Does that change how we tag it?

I’m not sure, this is an interesting situation. I can see the arguments for tagging the two halves of the crossing differently; but can also see the arguments for tagging them both as traffic light controlled (it just happens that the safe crossing period for the general traffic lane is basically only the length of the amber on any of the parts of the light sequence).

Maybe tagging the two halves differently would be more representative of people’s actual experience when crossing, i.e. wait for a gap in the traffic and take your chances, rather than waiting for a specific part of the traffic light sequence.

Maybe when The Sail Works is finished, this junction will get reworked a little to improve things for pedestrians!

> As an aside, I think the labelling of Cable Street vs Parliament street is wrong

Agreed. I wonder if it’s actually Parliament Street on both carriageways all the way down to the junction around Sugar House Alley?

Looking at mapillary the only other road sign I can see is one for North Road on the building immediately south of Sugar House Alley (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.05146740053016&lng=-2.797175192922168&z=18.002058557365068&pKey=503566007671134&focus=photo).

I’ve fixed North Road in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170343078

Do you want to go ahead and fix Cable Street/Parliament Street to whatever you think is best supported by the evidence?

> I guess there's also the unmarked crossing of Greyhound Bridge Road to the NW of the lights.

Yeah, I think that should be tagged the same as the NE-bound Parliament Street. 

On that basis, I think I am leaning towards crossing=traffic_signals, crossing:signals=shared, button_operated=no for all of them, with different values of crossing:markings= for them.
Dezza (2025-08-12 17:13:39+00:00): Updated the crossings in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170352860
Going to do a little more research on the street naming - hopefully I can find a usable source
Dezza (2025-08-12 17:38:21+00:00): So there's an interesting quirk on this 1890 map - https://maps.nls.uk/view/229946781 with "Back Cable Street" appearing behind buildings on "Parliament Street" on what is now the car park for the Parliament Street Retail Park.

That aside, all the other evidence I have is that Parliament Street runs as far as the North Road junction on both sides.

The key point is this bus lane order from 2019 - https://council.lancashire.gov.uk/documents/s155424/Appendix%20A.pdf
- While it has maps that we can't use, it does have a textual description which presumably we can use which talks about a bus lane starting on Parliament Street 105 metres south west of the Centreline of Bulk Road, to the left turn filter at its junction with Greyhound Bridge Road. That to me is enough evidence that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96055314 is not Cable Street and is in fact Parliament Street.

Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170353883
gurglypipe (2025-08-12 18:14:05+00:00): Nice work! Thanks for digging into this
eggie (2025-08-09 06:25:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback    Je wijziging is niet correct. Het is niet de bedoeling om de routering te beïnvloeden door van een 'trap' een voetpad te maken. 
Het routeerde gewoon voor fietsers omdat er de tag bicycle=dismount op staat.
Wat is het probleem hier? 
Het lijkt me beter de wijziging terug te draaien. De voorgaande mapper is zeer ervaren en het routeerde gewoon. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=53.198873%2C5.519857%3B53.19759%2C5.52203
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
JeroenHoek (2025-08-09 08:51:00+00:00): Aangepast.

Zoals in de note aangegeven: de verkeersbordencombinatie hier verplicht je tot afstappen. Hier liggen treden met een schuine helling voor ernaast. Daar zou je op kunnen fietsen, maar dat is niet toegestaan. Hij is wel fijn breed, zodat je ook een fiets met bepakking makkelijk aan de hand mee kan nemen, maar belangrijker: rolstoelen en kinderwagens kun je er langs duwen.

Deze helling is getagt met ramp:bicycle en ramp:wheelchair.
JackW25 (2025-08-08 21:08:36+00:00): Local knowledge
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-26 07:48:36+00:00): Reverted added SEO spam POI due to blatantly promotional description, spammy image=* tag, ALL CAPS name and missing any meaningful top-level tags

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183192098
Glassman (2025-08-10 23:17:50+00:00): On this and the previous edit you added a descriptive name to the service road. Unfortunately we don't use descriptive names. Only add names to features that are signed. Can you review these edits to make sure the names are appropriate? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. Let me know if you need any help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170177344
Tatfahren (2025-12-23 19:17:53+00:00): Ich glaube hier ist irgendwas beim upload schiefgelaufen, hier sind einige leere nodes entstanden, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13058815451/history

Kannst du das vielleicht nochmal prüfen?
tvbrene (2025-12-24 19:57:15+00:00): Keine Ahnung, wie das passiert ist, eigentlich hätte JOSM davor warnen müssen.
Tatfahren (2025-12-24 22:20:34+00:00): Im iD Editor passiert mir das immer wenn ich den Tab während des uploads versehentlich schließe.
Langlaeufer (2026-03-13 13:49:39+00:00): Du hast mit diesem Changeset jede Menge loser Punkte mit foot=yes hinterlassen
streckenkundler (2026-03-13 15:05:15+00:00): Siehe auch:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2488756
Pilsetkartetajs (2025-08-24 21:51:23+00:00): Punkts pārbīdīts ar Bing maps bez Bing nobīdes pielabošanas, tādēļ iepriekš tas bija precīzāk atzīmēts nekā tagad. Izmaiņu atcēlu.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170178231
Andrea Musuruane (2025-08-10 11:20:15+00:00): Ciao. In Italia i numeri civici non vanno mai messi sugli edifici. Il numero civico è il numero che contraddistingue l'accesso esterno che dall’area di circolazione (strada, piazza, via, ecc) immette direttamente o indirettamente alle unità immobiliari (abitazioni, esercizi commerciali, uffici, garage, ecc.) o alle aree recintate non edificate (es. stabilimenti balneari). Non è quindi corretto associare i tag addr:* ad un edificio. Bisogna quindi inserire un nodo in corrispondenza dell'ingresso dove si trova la targhetta ed etichettalo opportunamente. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170178991
mcliquid (2025-08-09 14:29:19+00:00): Hi and thank you for your contribution!

Please note for the future: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:
• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)
• keep changes within the same country
• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
German C (2025-12-03 21:36:16+00:00): Hola Lolj, ¿por que borraste los edificios, piscinas que habían creado otros usuarios? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170179628 (en rojo aparecen los edificios que eliminaste)
CurlingMan13 (2025-09-24 18:57:46+00:00): Is there a reason you removed the name and brand info for Starbucks rather than to "proposed:" or "construction:" ?

All info from note was previously incorporated to aid in note closure and you removed said info without even adding a note.  If you have info, feel free to map it rather than leaving it only in a note.
DawsZed (2025-09-24 20:44:44+00:00): I admit I was a little frustrated at the open note on an empty lot, and didn't consider proposed: tags. I'm sorry, I want this closed as much as you do. I'll add back in the tags that I deleted.
eggie (2025-08-09 06:35:46+00:00): Hi   Your edits are okay, but your comment is always the same?
The address is at the mooring.

 comment : merged with address node? 

That is not the case in this matter.

Greetz,
eggie
ThomasSchweizer (2025-08-10 22:34:48+00:00): Thank you for the feedback.
joel56dt (2025-08-14 22:47:24+00:00): Hi meark,
There are in fact sharrows painted here (and have been since about 2011 according to Google Street View). I have added these back.

Thanks,
Joel
meark (2025-08-15 02:19:02+00:00): Hi there- https://www.google.com/maps/@49.2247691,-123.0410227,3a,43.1y,1.74h,91.56t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sOJGu_jEfSlYoKc0RML870Q!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D-1.559542542075306%26panoid%3DOJGu_jEfSlYoKc0RML870Q%26yaw%3D1.741675448811872!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDgxMi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D this is from 2024. 

There are no sharrows or signage north bound here- I literally ride this every day- nor is there any on the rest of the way to 45th.
meark (2025-08-15 02:21:16+00:00): And there are only sharrows in the southbound turn lane to make it clear where cyclists should be. the rest of the road section has no signage.
nyanpsyche (2025-08-15 23:48:06+00:00): Hi Meark,

You are correct that there are no sharrows northbound, but the data already reflected that prior to your edit with cycleway:right=shared_lane and cycleway:left=no.

The southbound shared lane is what Joel restored in the most recent changeset.

Nyan
Kovoschiz (2025-08-19 06:39:22+00:00): Please discuss with others before adding back these names https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170649572
user_5359 (2025-08-09 06:04:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the website: there is a 404 error.
user_5359 (2025-08-09 06:02:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM!

Short hint for the value of the key service_times. Is the service held every day or only on Sundays? In the latter case, you forgot the day abbreviation Su.
By the way, we write the time in 24-hour notation.
Kovoschiz (2025-08-09 12:22:00+00:00): 1. Don't change the `name=` . Add `old_name=` 
2. Please don't add "Ridge" names when it's a named footpath. Draw a different `=ridge`
Warin61 (2025-08-17 06:40:55+00:00): Hi,
Stops should be at the very beginning of a route relation... 
Relation 2963173 ... looks to be Melb 2 Melb via Albury ... doubles back on it self.... I have tried to correct this ... now no back tracking and a continuous line.
Warin61 (2025-08-17 06:47:18+00:00): I have moved the 'stops' to the start of the relation 2963173. Rather than use the station building .. use the platforms with role platform...
donmac703 (2025-08-18 00:35:37+00:00): I should have been more specific in the comment. "Start adding (gtfs) stops (as OSM platforms to update to PTv2)".

Yes, I needed to go back and unravel the whole platform/stop issue. (There are a bunch of problems/inconsistencies on the NSW lines and I have since been busy with bus routes...) While there is reasonable tooling to examine/correct bus routes, the ecosystem is smaller for train routes.
Warin61 (2025-08-18 01:09:20+00:00): I occasionally check with https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=146.08876&lat=-37.13979&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

I mainly check the long distance routes eg Syd to Perth
Warin61 (2025-10-17 06:58:04+00:00): The 'stops' you added look to be 'train stations'... not platforms or stops ... 

Been some months .. I'll delete the 'stops' and simply leave the start and end
Oos1812 (2025-08-09 05:14:22+00:00): ×海老名市中央・国分南
○海老名市扇町・上郷・泉
kortgodt (2025-08-11 08:25:01+00:00): Hvorfor har du slettet features fra den nyligt genindviede musikhuspark?
kortgodt (2025-08-11 08:27:43+00:00): https://migogaarhus.dk/ny-udgave-af-musikhusparken-indviet/
kortgodt (2025-08-11 08:28:25+00:00): https://realdania.dk/nyheder/2025/06/musikhusparken-aabner
osmviborg (2025-08-11 08:52:32+00:00): Fordi det lignede en byggeplads. Du har fået dine features tilbage.
kortgodt (2025-08-11 09:01:55+00:00): Hvis du have læst det oprindelige changeset kunne du se at der stod Musikhusparken er åben måske det var en god ledetråd til ikke at slette noget fordi det ligner en byggeplads. Hvis du stadig er i tvivl kan du jo lave din egen research eller spørge brugeren af det oprindelige ærdringssæt.
Lostmonkey (2025-08-11 10:23:55+00:00): Man er altid velkommen til at spørge :) Skulle måske have været lidt tydeligere i ændringssættenes kommentarer om at mine rettelser er lavet på baggrund af de nyeste luftfotos og besøg på stedet. Men altså: Parken syd for domen er taget i brug/åbnet. Den gangsti som slynger sig ned vest for Aros, var sidste gang jeg var forbi ikke helt færdig i bunden. Området omkring domen vil nok stadig være byggeplads et halvt års tid endnu.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-18 06:48:54+00:00): DWG revert - deletion of roads servicing other properties

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170598180
nevw (2025-08-09 14:27:19+00:00): I reverted this edit
oruk09 (2026-04-07 01:41:01+00:00): 신방에피트? 이쪽이라던가 몇몇 구역은 확인하기 힘든데 혹시 제가 확인 할 수 있는 자료가 있을까요?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-09 07:20:53+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1421094826

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ebabaj74 (2025-08-09 07:27:06+00:00): Poprawiłem, sugerowałem się tym jak inne budynki w sąsiedztwie mają wpisany adres.
bartgron (2025-08-09 20:33:14+00:00): 1. Dodałeś adres do garażu, podczas gdy jest on już dodany do budynku mieszkalnego (nie ma potrzeby dublowania danych) oraz dodałeś do garażu jakąś dziwną relację.
2. Zamieniłeś obszar mieszkalny na wielki dom jednorodzinny.
3. Usunąłeś istniejącą drogę wewnętrzną.

Wszystkie błędy poprawiłem i dodałem podjazd na Twoją posesję co powinno pomóc w lepszym prowadzeniu nawigacji.
Pozdrawiam
ebabaj74 (2025-08-10 18:13:25+00:00): Bardzo serdecznie dziękuję. Nie chciałem usuwać drogi. Chciałem usunąć swoją edycję. Nie wiem co robiłem. Jeszcze raz dziękuję za pomoc.
ebabaj74 (2025-08-10 18:15:57+00:00): Jakoś u mnie nie działa. Trasa rysuje się do sąsiadów. :(