piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ventox23 (2025-05-25 14:09:38+00:00): Hallo Langläufer, das was du sagst ist richtig. Das der Weg separat erfasst ist, habe ich scheinbar in der App übersehen. Auf der Ostseite ist weiterhin kein Gehweg vorhanden. Da habe ich scheinbar nicht richtig aufgepasst sry. Die Änderung kann daher rückgängig gemacht werden.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166705498
Langlaeufer (2025-05-25 14:11:21+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung. Hab ich erledigt. Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166705498
Glassman (2025-05-25 19:50:01+00:00): If this is a cycleway, how do people get to their garage? I think you want highway=service + bicycle=yes + motor_vehicle=yes. Please review this edit. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166705601
Glassman (2025-05-25 19:51:33+00:00): #TIP: we spell out street names in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time with abbreviations
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166705905
Neuwessi11 (2025-08-13 19:52:54+00:00): Hallo rumpelsocke!
Bist Du sicher, dass es sich hiernei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389339432 wirklich um eine Kleingartenanlage handelt? Als ich kürzlich von der Schmerberger Straße her geschaut habe und auch vom Luftbild her sieht das nach vielem (einzelner Garten, Teil des Reiterhofs, wirtschaftlich genutzt) aus, aber nicht nach irgendetwas Kleingartenmäßigem.
Viele Grüße!
Neuwessi
rumpelsocke (2025-08-25 14:32:00+00:00): Hallo Neuwessi11,
Dieser Teil des Grundstückes wird tatsächlich als Garten- und Wochenendgrundstück und gehört nicht mit zum Reiterhof genutzt. Der Reiterhof befindet sich dahinter. Das Luftbild bei ID dürfte so 2-3 Jahre alt sein. Ich glaube "allotments" ist hier schon passend.
Gruß rumpelsocke
Capello13 (2025-05-26 19:33:07+00:00): Bonsoir,
Je pense qu'on pourrait mettre 2 stations de charge, une pour les voitures (motorcar=yes) et une autre pour les vélos (bicycle=yes).
Ça simplifiera l'ajout des capacités de charge et du type de prise.
SrouxVisitLimousin (2025-05-27 17:11:04+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai modifié pour avoir 2 objets, un pour les vélos et l'autre pour les voitures. Par contre, je n'arrive pas à trouver le bon type de prise. Dans le doute, je ne les ai pas renseigné. J'ai des photos qui illustrent. Comment les partager ?
Capello13 (2025-05-27 18:34:25+00:00): Il est possible de comparer les photos avec les photos ou symboles disponibles dans le wiki pour trouver le type de prise : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity=charging%20station?uselang=fr
Les prises de cette station de recharge sont elles différentes ?
SrouxVisitLimousin (2025-05-30 11:55:39+00:00): C'est bon j'ai trouvé les deux types de prise en retournant sur place.
user_5359 (2025-05-25 07:40:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Quick note: Do you have service every day of the week at 09:30? Or only on Sundays? In this case, the day abbreviation Su is missing before the start time. The duration is rarely documented.
Klutzershy (2025-05-26 10:06:28+00:00): Hello, thank you! Apologies, I forgot to add the abbreviation. I've also removed the duration for it
Glassman (2025-05-25 19:53:50+00:00): #TIP: we don't use descriptive names. Since the house already has an address, adding a node with the same address doesn't really help. You could add a driveway from the street to the house.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166706875
b-jazz (2025-05-24 17:34:21+00:00): Ah crap. My bad.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-24 17:50:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12861126604

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
bxl-forever (2025-05-24 20:03:31+00:00): Hello,

I see you are changing a lot of paths now.

As a map editor, it is your responsibility to make sure it is still usable by everyone.  If you change a footway into a cycleway, then this path will disappear from navigation results for pedestrians.  I am asking because I see a lot of gaps here now in the grid.  Really not possible for pedestrians to walk anywhere here?

Also, please always inspect the list of tags of objects you edit.  I see you use the embedded editor from the osm.org website (which we call iD).  In that case, do not just look at presets but also make sure that tags are coherent.  I see in this path (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1317574911/history/4) that you made it a cycleway but did not change other tags, so we end up with highway=cycleway + bicycle=yes on the same way.  The latter tag creates an exception for nothing, it should be cleaned up.

Thanks and happy mapping.
NeisBot (2025-05-24 18:07:58+00:00): Hi Dramane Sogoba, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added multiple nodes to improve map detail."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #NoComment
todeveni (2025-05-29 13:19:15+00:00): Kerrostalojen pihoja ei ole syytä tägittää access=private.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Key:pihatie

Ote OSM wikistä: "Järjestyslain toisen pykälän mukaan asuinkerrostalojen lukitsemattomat pihat ovat lähtökohtaisesti yleisiä paikkoja. Niiden läpi saa siten kulkea ilman rikosoikeudellisia seuraamuksia. Myös jokamiehenoikeudet takaavat kulun kerrostalon yhteispihalla"

"[...] kerrostalojen pihateille ei ole syytä laittaa reititystä rajoittavaa access=*-tagia, vaikka niille olisi pystytetty hyvin yleisesti käytössä olevia rajoituskylttejä"
kupteri (2025-05-29 15:33:36+00:00): Ahaa, nyt opin uutta. Eli kerrostalojen pihoihin saa mennä vaikka olisi kylteillä kielletty. Olin olettanut että sama kuin muissa koskisi. Tuolla sivulla kerrottiinkin että: "Kerrostaloista poiketen omakotitalon, rivitalon ja pienkerrostalon piha-alue nauttii kotirauhan suojaa. Soveltuvissa tapauksissa näille teille voi laittaa access=private tai access=destination-tagin."

Toisaalta näissä pihojen keskellä on suurin osa oikein kävelyväyliä mutta sitten siellä on yksi tai kaksi kapeaa "polkua" jotka on merkattu poluksi ja ne sitten paistaa läpi sallittuina. Nehän ei siis oikeasti ole mitään polkuja pyöräilyteknisessä mielessä vaan monesti väylä leikkipaikalle tai grillikatokseen.
AndyB_66 (2025-05-24 18:23:39+00:00): Używaj, proszę, sensownych komentarzy do zestawu zmian - ponieważ „update” nie pomaga innym mapperom zrozumieć, co robisz. Stosuj się do zasad, obowiązujących w społeczności OSM: osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Dziękuję!
limes11 (2025-08-24 20:47:18+00:00): Schau bitte mal auf

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4927835

Woher kommt dieser Edeka ?

Vielen Dank
Metzor (2025-05-25 06:19:41+00:00): Hi offissa!

In case the surface ist still grass as also aerial images suggest, I think your smoothness and tracktype values are too optimistic.

 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness

Best regards
Metzor
offissa (2025-05-25 08:51:52+00:00): Thanks, I edited it.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2025-05-24 22:13:17+00:00): hello, can you explain your edit, before reverting them? they do not follow the guidelines
Terra Limpa & Taludes (2025-05-24 22:50:44+00:00): Hi, I'm new to this, could you explain, I didn't get it.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2025-05-24 22:55:46+00:00): read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
you deleted data and added nonsense data. like "Terra Limpa e Taludes - João Quintal" which seems self promoting spam.
Terra Limpa & Taludes (2025-05-24 23:06:58+00:00): Maybe I don't know what I'm doing and you can help or I can delete, get better information and do it again.

I have activity open as a "gardening" and would like to (yes) promote but the point is to be on btcmaps as someone said I should do it to accept BTC or to looked for Bitcoiners.
bartgron (2025-05-24 22:21:47+00:00): Proszę o używanie właściwych opisów zestawów zmian:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
IvanBabić (2025-05-26 11:42:00+00:00): I revert because of a wrong tag change #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166775035
todeveni (2025-05-29 13:24:01+00:00): Kerrostalojen pihat eivät ole yksityisiä
bartgron (2025-05-24 22:20:37+00:00): Proszę o używanie właściwych opisów zestawów zmian:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
user_5359 (2025-05-25 08:13:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1285338814. What is the mean of the tag "0"=""? Please correct also the value of voltage.
Kvedulv (2025-05-25 12:59:40+00:00): Whoops, very sorry, corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166733606
eggie (2025-05-24 20:12:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-05-24 20:21:11+00:00): De 30 km zone heb ik teruggezet.
Wat is je bron in deze? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-24 20:13:26+00:00): Dag Rik,

oneway=no is default en hoef je niet toe te voegen op reguliere wegen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-24 20:15:08+00:00): Dag Rik,

Deze wijziging is niet correct en slaat een gat in de routeringsvoorkeur van wegen.

Ik zal dit terugdraaien.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-24 20:17:01+00:00): reverted by changeset #166712092
rempshaener (2025-05-24 21:15:19+00:00): Hallo,
ein kleiner Hinweis: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen verbunden werden.
Das lässt sich schnell beheben: im Editor „E“ drücken und der Hydrant löst sich von der Straße.
Viele Grüße
bartgron (2025-05-24 22:28:53+00:00): Proszę o stosowanie poprawnych opisów zestawów zmian zamiast "poprawki":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
I-Izzo (2025-06-21 19:49:13+00:00): Be careful with how you layer buildings, it is ok if the sidewalk is not right on the image since there is some distortion to the image. But the buildings and sidewalks should not be layer -1
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166712704
eggie (2025-05-25 09:57:48+00:00): Dah Jan,
Je vraagt feedback... Wanneer het een highway=path blijkt te zijn zou je de surface=...   toe kunnen voegen ivm routering.  .. path wordt meestal afgehandeld als onverhard. 

MVG
eggie
janhals (2025-05-25 20:25:18+00:00): Dank je Eggie, gedaan.
Mathias_ADAV (2025-06-11 15:28:08+00:00): Salut, à ma connaissance il y-a rien sur ce carrefour, l'as tu vu récemment ? Merci !
Sébastien Pi (2025-06-11 15:44:03+00:00): Salut Mathias,

Il y avait une note (qui parlait d’un aménagement récent) et j’y suis passé il y a 3 semaines environ. De mémoire il y avait une bande à droite de la chaussée. Et il me semble une peinture spéciale au sol pour la faire ressortir. Dommage, j’ai pas pensé à l’ajouter.
Après comme je ne connais pas vraiment le coin, je pourrais m’être trompé avec un autre rond point, mais je ne pense pas. Il a une forme particulière.
Je ne suis pas prêt d’y repasser. Sinon je t’aurais envoyé une photo :). Demande peut-être à notre correspondant local pour confirmer.

@+
bbqman (2025-05-24 21:12:01+00:00): Also source: Wikimedia Commons
danieldegroot2 (2025-05-25 11:28:46+00:00): Hey ViktoriaU,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Make sure you follow the guidelines on adding names, especially abbreviated ones.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
(others you added are abbreviated, but should likely not be.)

For other useful tips, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

Also, are your changes also part of an [organised effort](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing) for 'walking data accuracy'? (just curious, eventhough it seems you are on your own)

If you have any questions about how to contribute, you can contact the (local) community at
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=52.35708,-7.70490&zoom=9
or open a thread on the forums
https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Regards,

Daniel
OddlyAngled (2025-05-30 00:41:30+00:00): please take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking - hiking routes should be official trails (not use trails), and the relation members should use defined roles like "main" or "approach". I'm not sure what "path" and "way" mean. some relation validator will flag these. also make sure to keep the informal=yes tag, it looks like it was removed. this helps with many renderers and routers.

it also looks like the gps data was imported and could use some clean up. I find that a combination of LIDAR data (Yosemite has great coverage in 3DEP) and aggregated GPS tracks, like Strava, in combination with my own tracks helps quite a bit with determining the true path on the ground.

thanks for the contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166713957
NorthCrab_upload (2025-05-24 21:40:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12861562049

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-05-25 09:24:56+00:00): Dag Ben,

Die paden lijken me correct. 
De begraafplaats heb ik als vlak uitgebreid.
Op de toegangsweg parkeerplaatst heb ik service=parking_aisle toegevoegd. Even als voorbeeld.
Het parallelvoetpad langs de Zilverlei heb ik verwijderd. 
Zag pas later dat het een actie van jou was. 
Dat is niet gebruikelijk en routeert ook niet. De tagging van de trottoirs is al opgenomen in de tagging van het fietspad met side_walk left (of right) of both.
Consensus hoe trottoirs te mappen is er niet, maar probeer eens op de kaart van het voetpad naar het fietspad te stappen. Dat gaat niet. Vaak zit je ook 'gevangen'op die voetpaden en je krijgt omwegen in de routering. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-05-25 09:45:42+00:00): typo sidewalk= .. zonder streepje
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
Wandel-Appeltje (2025-05-25 15:20:20+00:00): Thx we laten het zo hoor.
dat voetpad was niet van mij hoor.
wel leerzaam.
sidewalk left of right... vanuit waar gezien is daar een regel voor? bv vanuit noord/west gezien ofzo?
eggie (2025-05-25 15:44:13+00:00): Je hebt gelijk, het is van een voorgaande mapper, maar omdat je iets met dat voetpad hebt gedaan komt je naam eraan te hangen.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=166714178

left of right.  Dat is gezien vanuit de tekenrichting van de weg.
Elke weg is ooit ingetekend en heeft dus een tekenrichting. (Niets te maken met eenrichting)
Het fietspad is dus ingetekend van noord naar zuid en dus sidewalk = right
In de bocht sidewalk=both en dan van west naar oost> sidewalk= left

Carto  (de standaardkaart) laat het overigens niet zien, maar er zijn vele kaarten.
Yunan973 (2025-11-29 19:00:19+00:00): It's very kind of you to add buildings that were demolished 3 years ago.
When you use imagery, it is better to use 2023 imagery than 2018 imagery.
I'm very surprised to see than someone member of OSM since 2017 makes this beginner's mistake.
Could you stop to make changes in Guyane ?
Walter Mayeku (2025-11-29 21:06:42+00:00): Excuse me Yunan, I don't think you have any rights to communicate the way you did. 

If you felt that Bing is old you should know how to communicate what you want to say in a respectable manner. If you feel Guyane is your special country it is okay as well but you haven't published anything about a recent image or Guyane on wiki for us mappers to know that there is a free and open recent image. 
So for the love of making the map better and crowdsourcing, I will keep on mapping where there is need. 
You don't have to feel triggered by edits, make the corrections and leave a comment respectfully.
Yunan973 (2025-12-02 12:41:05+00:00): "if you feel that Bing is old" : outch ! It seems you don't know that almost all imageries have a date (vintage) which allows you to choose the more recent one. With JOSM, go to imagery menu, then choose imagery preferences (I don't use JOSM, I found this on the wiki, use the help of JOSM if needed).
Another problem is the relation you have created : the building was a square with a hole, and you add a building inside the buiding instead of a hole : another beginner's mistake.

World is big, I sure you will find people who will love your changes, but not in French Guyane nor any other parts of France, please.

My suggest : begin to fix errors in Kenya, for example these ones :
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=37.33790&lat=-0.27683&zoom=6&baselayer=OSM%20Carto%20(OSMF)&opacity=0.50&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
aixbrick (2025-05-25 08:54:19+00:00): Hello,
as I stated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4762161 please do not use "highway=construction" unless the road is blocked for *all* users. Pontdriesch is not closed for pedestrians.
Regards
tg4567 (2025-05-25 10:55:57+00:00): ok, please update with the correct tag.  but vehicle=destination is not correct.  This road will be closed to cars for months, and no cars should be routed here.
aixbrick (2025-05-25 11:31:38+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166730199.
I explained the reason vor "vehicle =destination" in in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4733518, there is also a link to Youtube where Regionetz explains how the construction zone and the closings work.
Routing with "vehicle=destination" works as expected: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=50.779071%2C6.082821%3B50.782368%2C6.077231.
tg4567 (2025-05-25 12:02:56+00:00): No it does not work correctly.  Car navigation:  

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=50.779064%2C6.082735%3B50.780469%2C6.079913#map=18/50.779780/6.081335

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=50.779064%2C6.082735%3B50.780469%2C6.079913

These car rides are impossible.
tux67 (2025-05-25 12:23:56+00:00): @ tg4567  your routing starts at the wrong point .. if you dump your car in the middle of the vehicle=destination zone there is no way for the routing engine to move you out repecting zhis very correct tagging aixbrick brought up!
tg4567 (2025-05-25 12:38:24+00:00): @tux67 this is why vehicle=destination is so wrong here.  You can drive your car between these endpoints I shared above.  pontstrasse is not closed at the moment.  But you can't drive on the path the routing algorithm gives you because there is construction.  you can go around it, and enter pontstrasse from kreuzherrenstrasse and exit from saarstrasse.  I drive this route almost every day and osm is horribly broken at the moment due to the incorrect vehicle=destination tag.

shall I take pictures?  it is clear you have no idea how this construction zone looks like.
tg4567 (2025-05-25 12:43:08+00:00): I made a sketch of what the current state of pontstr looks like: https://postimg.cc/TL4J2VsD

The current state is horribly wrong and broken.  You can't drive from Hirschgraben to Pontstr.  But you can go around.
tux67 (2025-05-25 12:53:30+00:00): There is no need for pictures to understand aixbricks argumentation. And if you drive there daily I hope you do not need OSM Routing. 
This is an ongoing weekly changing status as I see. You can not cover any scenario of this moving target, but can give credits to most users that they have eyes to see the local signs and act accordingly.
tg4567 (2025-05-25 14:25:08+00:00): The map is wrong and it is easily fixable.  Why not just fix it rather than keeping something incorrect?
aixbrick (2025-05-25 14:48:07+00:00): Because 3rd-party-users like other maps or routing engines do not update their data on daily or weekly base but on monthly or even yearly base. Today and maybe the next few weeks there will be the road closed on Pontdriesch but in Juli it could be reopened and instead the Pontstraße at Kreuzherrenstraße will be closed. Sure, you can change that in OSM (which is a geo database not a map by the way), but it will take time until 3rd-party-users will know about it. Time in which construction work progresses. It is better to tag the whole road for the construction period with an approbiate tag (like "vehicle=destination") so that through traffic will be redirected. Residents know about the closing and theire visitors must be informed by them. That could not be handled by OSM.
StreetSurveyor (2025-05-25 19:15:02+00:00): "Wallingford Road/Kinross Road" isn't a road name.
NeisBot (2025-05-24 23:22:46+00:00): Hi Dembele Youba, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added bus station amenity to reflect local transportation infrastructure"

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #AIgenerated #NoComment
Sylabowy Kot (2025-05-24 23:22:53+00:00): Przypadkowe naruszenie landuse=railway i już się zrobił większy changeset... 
Przykładowe źródło informacji: https://www.cdprojekt.com/pl/media/aktualnosci/cd-projekt-kupil-kompleks-nieruchomosci-przy-jagiellonskiej-74-w-warszawie/
Wcześniej zajmowali budynek 74E, a teraz zdaje się mają prawie całą powierzchnię dla siebie, w tym nowy budynek.
Jarek 🚲 (2025-05-24 23:43:55+00:00): correction: this was actually using Esri imagery, so alignments would be to Esri
mueschel (2025-05-25 09:45:38+00:00): Hi,
could you check this kerb? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11109129468
It has several tags that are not used in other kerbs:
  counter = slope: <= 5%
  description = Incline: 11%
  top = landing: >=60"
  two_sided = yes
afuchs (2025-05-25 21:07:19+00:00): I've updated the tags on this specific kerb node to better align with OSM standards.

There's several ways near this node in the Buffalo Medical Campus which which have nonstandard but very detailed tags.

Given how detailed these nonstandard tags are I've been avoiding edits to this area in case there's a community here that has a special interest in the accessibility of this area's sidewalks.
k127 (2025-05-26 13:40:59+00:00): Hi LaLinea,

lass mich hier den Link zur Notiz anbringen, deren Diskussion, denke ich, zu diesem Änderungssatz gehört:

<https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3936997>

Beste Grüße, k127
sannkc (2025-05-25 00:25:34+00:00): Correct changeset comment: Added land use areas