piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hb- (2023-08-19 13:02:59+00:00): Also the strucutre of this house https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/879240783 is standing. Please see source in objects history and 0:45 in https://vimeo.com/853870275 Therefore building=construction.
6dmndUwtBJW8 (2023-08-21 23:51:59+00:00): Thanks.

Imagery taken after wildfire released on openaerialmap.
Jrachi (2024-11-28 09:13:51+00:00): Ciao.
Ti ringrazio a nome della comunità OSM per l'impegno che dimostri.
Come tutti i principianti commetti qualche errore, ma nessuno nasce imparato e se hai fatto solo un corso accelerato è facile incorrere in errori molto comuni.
I tag di accesso - si mette "no" quando esiste una regolamentazione locale, per i sentieri si tratta di un'ordinanza comunale che vieta espressamente il transito su un sentiero (o su qualunque strada).
In questo caso posso avere il dubbio che sia veramente vietato a bici e cavalli. Tu se lo hai messo sai sicuramente se è così.
Hai battezzato il sentiero col nome "Sent 315". Anche qui mi permetto di sollevare qualche dubbio sulla veridicità. È perfettamente normale che un sentiero non abbia un nome, anche se ci si può riferire ad un sentiero con il codice della relazione a cui appartiene, non significa che quello sia il nome.
Lascio per ultimo l'errore più eclatante:
 width=3120
Si tratta di un errore di battitura? O di copia-incolla?
Quello che hai scritto significa che quel sentiero ha una larghezza di 3120 metri
Se è vero, è il sentiero più largo del mondo
Se il valore è corretto, ma si tratta di millimetri dovresti scrivere:
3.120
in OSM si usa la regola inglese dove il punto è il separatore dell'unità dai decimali.
Ma che senso ha indicare una larghezza in millimetri su un sentiero lungo 1500 metri?

Lascio a te l'ardua scelta della soluzione.

Cordialmente
Ivo
Paoluss (2024-11-28 15:53:28+00:00): Grazie, Ivo.
Partiamo dall'errore più eclatante: la larghezza. E' chiaramente un errore, quindio cancellato la larghezza che non può essere 3120; 3120 è in realtà la lunghezza del sentiero. 
Per quanto riguarda il nome: il tratto in questione fa parte del sentiero 315, e in effetti 315 è il nome di tutto il sentiero. Il sentiero è segnato con le frecce CAI ed il numero indicato è 315. Mi pare di poter dire che oramai quel sentiero viene, o progressivamente verrà, indicato come Sentiero 315.
Per quanto riguarda i divieti: le Linee Guida per l'istituzione e la gestione della Rete Escursionistica della
Sardegna (R.E.S.) approvate con la Delib.G.R. n. 48/36 del 02 /10/2018 e successive modificazioni (ultima del 23.2.2024) prevedono all'art.8 comma 1 che i sentieri facenti parte della RES possano essere percorsi solo a piedi; possono essere previste le MTB, anche a pedalata assistita e a cavallo solo se esplicitamente consentito da apposita segnaletica.
L'uso dei mezzi a motore è invece previsto dal comma 5 "l transito dei mezzi a motore è consentito solo per attività di vigilanza, controllo, soccorso, assistenza sanitaria e veterinaria, antincendio e protezione civile da parte dei soggetti preposti. Il transito dei mezzi a motore è altresì consentito, previa autorizzazione dell'ente territorialmente competente per i mezzi dei titolari di diritti reali o personali di godimento relativamente a fondi o immobili situati nel territorio servito dal percorso, limitatamente al tratto necessario a raggiungere tali fondi o immobili, nonché per i mezzi di chi debba transitare per svolgere attività agro-silvo-pastorali autorizzate e per interventi di manutenzione o monitoraggio sulla RES autorizzati. 
L'art. 40  (sanzioni e vigilanza) del T.U. Turismo (LR 16/2017) prevede che "...chiunque acceda o transiti sugli itinerari della Rete Escursionistica con mezzi a motore, senza la necessaria autorizzazione, è soggetto alla sanzione amministrativa pecuniaria da euro 250 a euro 2.500". Per intendersi: è lo stesso articolo che sanziona chiunque porti via sabbia, sassolini, conchiglie dalle spiagge (sanzione da 500 a 3.000 euro).
Ciao 
Paolo
Jrachi (2024-11-28 16:46:52+00:00): Ciao.
Grazie delle notevoli informazioni.
Sto cercando di "guardare" le relazioni hiking su tutto il territorio nazionale, e so che le leggi regionali in questi ambiti hanno somiglianze e differenze varie.
Riguardo al nome potrei ancora chiedere se "Sent" sia un'abbreviazione o un termine linguistico locale?

Ivo
Paoluss (2024-11-29 10:51:30+00:00): Ciao Ivo. 
"Sent" sta per abbreviazione di "Sentiero".
Avrei dovuto scrivere "Sentiero" o non scrivere nulla?
Paolo
Jrachi (2024-11-29 11:51:07+00:00): È meglio scrivere il nome per esteso.
È una regola generale
In caso di sent. è abbastanza sicuro sia un sentiero.
Ma quando è scritto "c." cosa sarà?
Casa, case, cascina, colle, cavoli?

Ivo
Suerlaenner (2023-08-22 20:28:59+00:00): Grüß dich!
Eine Frage zu den neu auf gestellten Bsig´s in Olsberg: Hattest du sie als KS-Signale gemappt? Auf Bildern in DSO sah mir die Bauform ehr nach kompakten HV-Signalen aus.
Schönen Gruß
Christopher
gallseife (2023-08-22 20:45:28+00:00): Hi Christopher,
beim zweiten Blick würde ich sagen, du hast recht. Neue Signale sind Ks stimmt halt nur fast immer ;)
Magst du das ändern?
Gruß
Suerlaenner (2023-08-23 04:45:42+00:00): Mache ich gerne. Ich freue mich, dass sich im Sauerland was tut. Die Blocksignale in Olsberg sind echt notwendig. Wie oft hat sich freitags der Zugverkehr in Bestwig gestapelt, wenn alle nach Brilon und Willingen wollten. Aber Veränderungen am Schienennetz dauern in Deutschland leider Jahrzehnte.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-15 09:50:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4858259803

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2023-08-15 10:40:41+00:00): Hi Guus...

I changed the tagging into river again according the surrounding rivertags. 
Yes it know this is an artificial waterway.  
Greetz,
eggie
mapcreator-guus (2023-08-15 10:49:02+00:00): That makes much more sense if you ask me. Good catch! I hadn't looked at those tags, to be honest. I simply noticed the flow direction was wrong, hence I updated those.
eggie (2023-08-15 10:51:08+00:00): Hi... anyway you solved the problem 😀
Lola Fox (2025-05-26 19:39:30+00:00): Ho cercato sulla CTR Emilia Romagna questo fosso ma non sembra esistere - Puoi verificare e far sapere https://geoportale.regione.emilia-romagna.it/mappe/geo-viewer
Lola Fox (2025-05-26 19:39:47+00:00): Orrido di Tana Malia
MauroL (2025-05-27 17:27:44+00:00): Confermo che "Orrido di Tana Malia" non è presente sulla CTR Emilia Romagna. La serie di cascate formate dal corso d'acqua che affluisce nel Fosso della Rodichiaia è conosciuto in loco come Tana Malia, ma è un toponimo di fantasia. Non ho aggiunto io il nome al torrente in quanto ho solo provveduto a mappare la traccia del percorso CAI 119 per il Catasto Nazionale Sentieri. Sui toponimi sono molto scrupoloso e aggiungo solo quelli di cui ho garanzia cartografica.
Possiamo eventualmente togliere il nome al corso d'acqua e aggiungere un nodo come località non popolata.
MauroL (2025-05-27 17:29:41+00:00): In questo link e descritto l'orrido di Tana Malia https://catastoforre.aic-canyoning.it/index/forra/cod/BO002
MauroL (2025-05-27 17:43:12+00:00): Ho controllato anche sulla CTR Toscana. Tana Malia non esiste come nome cartografico. Confermo che è un toponimo di uso solo locale, come ad esempio il turistico "Val Carlina" per indicare il territorio di Lizzano in Belvedere.
Lola Fox (2025-05-28 19:56:46+00:00): Ok. Come lo possiamo correttamente mappare?
Lola Fox (2025-05-28 19:58:00+00:00): Sinceramente non so come risolvere la questione correttamente. Tu che dici?
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-15 10:20:17+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025366386

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-08-15 10:20:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025366385

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
dcapillae (2023-08-15 13:09:52+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Buen trabajo.

Si se trata de la entrada a un parking subterráneo, use mejor «amenity=parking_entrace» junto con «parking=underground». Hay más detalles en el wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_entrance

Puede también añadirle etiquetas de restricción de acceso, como, por ejemplo, «access=customers» si se trata de un parking solo para clientes.

En el caso de que fuese la entrada a un garaje particular, use «entrance=garage» en lugar de «barrier=gate». La etiqueta «barrier=gate» se suele usar en muros o vallas para indicar donde está la verja de entrada. Hay más detalles en el wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
mueschel (2023-08-19 15:05:04+00:00): Hi,
you added a strange "souce ID" tag to three nodes, could you check that?
user_11609320 (2023-08-15 10:29:26+00:00): I think this is the dirt road that goes from one salt mine to the main salt mine just south amboy. Same company runs both mines
village (2023-10-01 10:11:58+00:00): thanks for fixing my misspelled tags, but: how did you detect them?
Hungerburg (2023-08-21 06:36:33+00:00): Carlo, das ist aber nicht gut so. Das Luftbild ist veraltet. Der Steig verlegt worden.

Ich werde revertieren müssen.
Carlo02 (2023-08-21 06:46:50+00:00): Hallo Hungerburg! Vielen Dank! Das habe ich übersehen.....sorry..
Hungerburg (2023-08-21 07:11:50+00:00): Blöd, da entstehen Konflikte, weil da noch danach eine Relation bearbeitet worden ist. Das macht das mühsam.

Zur Info: razed:highway ist die Art, wie in den Daten drauf hingewiesen wird, dass etwas weggemacht worden ist, was am Luftbild noch zu sehen ist.

Bist du nicht von dort?
Hungerburg (2023-08-21 07:48:19+00:00): Ich habs zurückgesetzt und die Runde um den Achensee Wanderweg-Relation repariert. Vgl. https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=22933 Höhenprofil anzeigen

Zw. Maurach und Pertisau wurden Radweg und Gehweg getrennt, das sieht man auf dem Luftbild auch. Das aktuell machen wird heikel, wegen der Relationen.
Carlo02 (2023-08-21 10:48:03+00:00): Danke für deine Bemühungen!
Im Bereich Buchau wurde der Radweg und der Gehweg getrennt (zwischen Seecamping Wimmer und learn2kite)
Den neuen Weg hab ich eingezeichnet und die Relationen der Radwege daraufhin verschoben. Den Wanderweg "Rund um den Achensee" blieb natürlich auf der alten Trasse! Hoffentlich habe ich das richtig gemacht - bin für Deine Tipps sehr dankbar!
https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=2071326&type=relation&map=16.0/47.4328/11.73
Hungerburg (2023-08-22 10:43:24+00:00): Hallo Carlo, wenn du mich so fragst, der Tipp schlechthin ist immer, hinfahren, sich dort umschauen. Auch wenn ich mich selber nicht immer dran halte.

Also war ich gestern dort. Deinen Radweg hab ich weiter gezogen bis Seespitz, auf der Schiebestrecke fahren eh alle. Vor lauter Details nicht fertig geworden. Das Mappen dauert bald länger als das Spazieren.
Carlo02 (2023-08-22 11:13:47+00:00): Super!
mataharimau (2023-08-20 16:49:12+00:00): You have deleted the trail to the rain station. This trail exists. See https://meowtainpeople.com/bukit-kembara/
mataharimau (2023-08-20 16:43:55+00:00): The trail makes a complete loop around the reservoir lake and passes along the mini waterfall. Could you have deleted this portion of the trail and the waterfall by mistake?
user_11609320 (2023-08-15 10:51:15+00:00): assessor's map book 0643, page 24  Revised in 12/14/2010
assessor's map book 0643 , page 25 Revised in 12/14/2010
Frans S (2023-08-16 09:25:23+00:00): Hello.  Please take a look to this webpage
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=139953501
I added a residential road, re-tagged a road, solved an issue with a building crossing a road, and adjusted some clustered buildings into individual ones.
Please check also on added layers to a building or road to hide an error which occurs when a mapper in IDeditor want to upload its work
Best regards
Boyan Alexiev (2023-08-24 10:57:09+00:00): Thank you for the comment Frans,
I missed that unclassified and residential are both white-ish in JOSM and didn't click to check.

Appreciate the feedback as always!
martien-176 (2023-08-15 12:42:36+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Please watch these 2 short video for more info: 
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139908840
HayleyQuinnx (2023-08-15 12:55:01+00:00): Thanks, will do for the future
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139908840
adiatmad (2023-08-16 01:25:22+00:00): Hey, great job on your edits!
Just wanted to give you a quick heads-up about something. It's better to avoid using generic names like "name=building OR house" (you can see an example here: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1198257585). Check out this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions) for more info on why.

If you're interested in learning more about mapping, there are some awesome free resources you can check out:
> Beginner's Mapping guide: https://osm.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide.
> Self-paced learning modules for intermediate/advanced mappers: https://learnosm.org

Happy mapping and keep up the good work!
jtracey (2023-09-27 21:56:54+00:00): Are these features under construction currently? Aerial imagery shows them as being complete.
welzheimerwald (2023-09-15 17:32:31+00:00): Sorry, why are the landuse polygones here arbitrarily cut off by straight lines?
VLD304 (2023-08-17 17:24:08+00:00): Hello CheloCoronda, 

I am reaching out in regards to edits made which broke the boundary relation for Delta Del Parana - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11179014/history#map=11/-31.9682/-60.5189.
Is there an updated boundary change to the wetland feature? The Ramsar site includes a boundary map for the feature https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/2255 

Thanks, 
VLD304
adiatmad (2023-08-21 04:05:25+00:00): Hey, great job on your edits! Just wanted to give you a quick heads up about something. It's better to avoid using generic names like "name=building OR house" (you can see an example here: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1198263736). Check out this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions) for more info on why.
If you're interested in learning more about mapping, there are some awesome free resources you can check out:
> Beginner's Mapping guide: https://osm.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide.
> Self-paced learning modules for intermediate/advanced mappers: https://learnosm.org
Happy mapping and keep up the good work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139910416
BCNorwich (2024-06-29 16:55:15+00:00): Hi, Are the two bridges actually boardwalks? If so then the tag should be bridge=boardwalk.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2024-06-29 16:56:01+00:00): Sorry three bridges.
stevewm (2024-06-29 19:22:07+00:00): Hi Bernard. Thanks for your comment. Yes they are.Two of them are already tagged with Highway=footway and bridge=boardwalk which I believe to be correct. The other wasn’t (it was bridge=yes) so I have changed it to match. I have also changed them to surface=wood rather than asphalt.
BCNorwich (2023-08-15 14:32:03+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just to be quite clear that is a public footpath, Bedford FP 1, the reason it can't be walked is because it is obstructed. 

Bedford Council like many others is somewhat relaxed in its duty to uphold public rights of way.

Regards Bernard.
user_20077829 (2023-08-15 14:42:43+00:00): Oh okay.
Should I re-add the removed path, as its officially a path even though you can't walk it?
BCNorwich (2023-08-15 14:54:39+00:00): Personally I'd reinstate it as a straight line as on the Bedford Council map but I don't think most folk would worry about it.

I've just reverted your next changeset as they are two separate paths. The short piece to north is the truncated section of the Bedford FP 1 footpath. Bedford FP 1 carrys on down Brookfield Road where it's tagged as highway=residential, designation=public_footpath and foot=designated.

Please don't be put off mappin by this, there's a lot to learn in OSM.

Regards Bernard.
user_20077829 (2023-08-16 12:19:05+00:00): I found a document relating to this path, saying that they will remove it from FP1
https://www.bedford.gov.uk/media/6292/download?inline
Konkon153 (2023-08-15 11:53:07+00:00): Berichtigung:
Relation "Kreisstraße 31" zu Relation "Kreisstraßen NWM" hinzugefügt
martien-176 (2023-08-15 12:49:23+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

One additional request: currently you are uploading every feature (like a building) apart. It is better to wait with uploading after you mapped several features (say 5 to 10 buildings). That way you work much faster, and it makes reviewing your work by validators easier.

Please watch these 2 short video for more info: 
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139911312
Kovoschiz (2023-08-15 13:04:21+00:00): Please tell me how to indicate a feature has no fax number. Deleting it doesn't solve anything.
Kovoschiz (2023-08-15 13:06:25+00:00): 2. Please use descriptive upload comments.
Kovoschiz (2023-08-15 13:07:10+00:00): 1. The significance here is all other branches in the area has a fax. This doesn't yet, apparently.
Kovoschiz (2023-08-15 13:09:43+00:00): 1. You should be removing the few "no" in https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/fax#values and https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/contact%3Afax#values instead. `no:*=` is somewhat used, and documented.
eggie (2023-08-15 12:34:39+00:00): Dag Luuk... vraag me af of de Josine de Bruyn Kopsweg wel een voetpad is met een maxspeed van 30.
Hoe komen auto's op die parkeervakken bij nr 22
De voorgaande mapper had deze straat als residential ingetekend.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=139911348
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-15 12:41:30+00:00): Ik heb in ieder geval de parkeerplaats bereikbaar maakt. 
Foutmelding nog steeds 30 km maxspeed op voetpad Josine de Bruyn Kopsweg
DeSchie (2023-08-16 10:25:00+00:00): Hi eggie,

Bedankt voor de opmerking! Mijn fout om inderdaad de 30 max niet weg te halen voor het voetpad en de parkeerplaats niet aan te sluiten. 

Zie hier onderbouwing voor deze aanpassingen. Het deel vanaf de parkeerplaats naar de Burg van Dijkesingel wordt een parkstrook/voetpad maar is nu nog in aanbouw.

https://www.bpdinwestergouwe.nl/het-carre-van-westergouwe/woningen?route=propertyType&status=Available.InOption.Sold

https://gis.gouda.nl/viewer/app/Basis_open?bookmark=0aa315b91e1c43429583621c50c2893d

Mvgr, Luuk
eggie (2023-08-16 10:32:07+00:00): Oke.. bedankt voor je reactie...
Mvg
eggie
Kovoschiz (2023-08-15 13:06:03+00:00): https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/contact:name has already been used nearly 200 times. This person is for the mobile only. Other details refer to the shop. Deleting it doesn't solve anything.
user_5359 (2023-08-18 05:14:18+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/4814795. What is the mean of the tag "Linie 1163848956 # Treschows gate (2 Punkte)" = "only"?
Gazer75 (2023-08-18 07:50:54+00:00): Pretty sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1163848956 need to be replaced by https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1163848955
The route runs east so it would be impossible to use the segment mentioned. The tag seem to use bad English to point this out.
Awoobis (2023-08-19 20:37:35+00:00): Jak była zamknięta to należało dodać bramę a nie usuwać drogę
Awoobis (2023-08-19 20:30:35+00:00): Nie stosujemy nazw opisowych! W tym przypadku należało zaznaczyć punktem miejsca w których występuje bramka, dodać barrier=gate, odpowiednią właściwość access=*
Awoobis (2023-08-19 20:31:44+00:00): Zakładam że te bramki miały być od strony ulicy, zaraz poprawię.
emersonveenstra (2023-10-07 13:59:52+00:00): Hi there,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1198276713 has an invalid operator:wikidata tag, could you please fix that? Thanks!
Skunkman56 (2023-10-07 21:52:57+00:00): Whoops! Thanks, its fixed now.
pio2_122 (2023-08-15 16:46:47+00:00): Bezpodstawna zmiana tagowania dróg w budowie.
Wycofane.
moje_konto (2023-08-15 15:43:01+00:00): W edytorze JOSM jest tryb poprawiania dokładności - zaznacza się linię i naciska klawisz W.

Gdy tryb jest aktywny, to domyślnie łapie najbliższy węzeł zaznaczonej linii.

SHIFT - ręczne złapanie węzła, jeśli potrzeba przenieść inny niż najbliższy.

Lewy myszy - przenosi złapany węzeł w miejsce kursora.

CTRL - dodanie nowego węzła (w zaznaczonej linii).

Jest to lepsze i szybsze niż kasowanie i tworzenie nowych węzłów.
pio2_122 (2023-08-15 16:48:51+00:00): Błędna zmiana tagowania terenu budowy (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1136982294/history), połączenie linii energetycznych z drogą, itd.

Wycofane.
Dimitar155 (2023-08-15 14:48:24+00:00): Здраейге,

Без да искате ли сте преместили пожарния кран (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7855275885)?
soerenwegenertc (2023-08-28 15:54:28+00:00): Hallo Enigma2024,

diese Änderung hat einige Inkonsistenzen:
- contract:website enthält nach wie vor den Link zur Apothekenwebsite
- operator ist nach wie vor der Name der Inhaberin der Apotheke
- Die Telefonnummer ist nach wie vor die der Apotheke
- Der Name des angeblichen Friseursalons ist "Barbershop"? Ist das tatsächlich der Name?

Ich kann keine Informationen über den Friseursalon finden, die Website der Apotheke sieht dagegen noch sehr aktiv aus. Liegt hier ein Versehen vor und es gibt an dieser Stelle gar keinen Friseursalon?

Schöne Grüße,
Sören
Enigma2024 (2023-08-28 16:01:20+00:00): Hi Sören,
sorry ich hab mich im Haus vertan. Habs direkt geändert.
Schöne Grüße
Enigma2024
soerenwegenertc (2023-08-28 16:04:00+00:00): Cool, das ging ja schnell, danke dir und noch einen schönen Tag!
eggie (2023-08-15 14:17:50+00:00): Dag Rellic... 
Tip....
Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt gewijzigd.

MVG'eggie
mariotomo (2023-08-16 12:25:04+00:00): hola, bienvenido(bienvenidos) a OSM, y bienvenida sea la específica de la posición de la empresa. les sugiero mejorar el entorno en que se encuentran, pues un visitante que los busque, necesitará puntos de referencia, no solo vuestra posición, en un entorno que casi queda vacío.
(le voy a quitar el nombre a la casa, pues no es la casa que tiene este nombre, sino la actividad, y esta ya está mapeada.)