piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab (2024-09-23 22:49:23+00:00): Dodałem brakującą nazwę ulicy - to dla tego był tutaj błąd :-) Pozdrawiam!
d3mol3k (2024-09-01 20:32:51+00:00): uciekł początek opisu edycj - cos było z relacją lini nocnej 530 jakby do góry nogami stworzona - usunąłem wszystkie elementy i dodałem na nowo. jakby było źle to proszę o usunięcie mojej edycji.
karr4s (2024-12-07 08:34:35+00:00): Salut. Dans cette modif, tu as supprimé un POI correspondant à un local vacant (8204717462) qui contenait pas mal d'information. Est-ce que c'était une erreur ?
Nzau (2024-12-07 08:40:31+00:00): Salut kare4s, oui sûrement une grosse erreur comme la dernière fois...
Sûrement parce que je pensais qu'il s'agissait d'une adresse en double...
Je vais essayer de le remettre, aurais tu son id ?
karr4s (2024-12-07 08:43:51+00:00): Oui : dans le premier message (entre parenthèses) ;)
Nzau (2024-12-07 08:46:17+00:00): Oups j'ai lu trop vite 😅
Je regarde ça ce weekend !
Nzau (2024-12-08 14:29:17+00:00): Le POI est revenu !
Encore désole pour la suppression...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160058679
dpolovinkin (2024-09-05 15:08:25+00:00): please write meaningful comments to your commits, I already mentioned it half a year ago in this comment - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148966964
dpolovinkin (2024-10-09 05:45:24+00:00): you don't see the comments or what?
MichS (2024-09-05 05:43:22+00:00): Hallo,

Fahrgassen auf dem Parkplatz den Namen Finanzamt zu geben ist falsch, der Parkplatz selbst ist so benannt. Ebenso sind die alle Fahrgassen am Schulzentrum Kusel jeweils mit einem Straßennamen benannt.

MFG
Wanderer_und_Radfahrer_Anton (2024-09-05 13:29:46+00:00): Hallo MichS,

ich stimme Ihnen zu, ich werde die Beschriftung der Parkplatz Fahrgassen des Finanzamtes korrigieren. 

Die Fahrgassen und Wege „Am Roßberg“, sind soweit ich sehe korrekt eingetragen. 
An der Einmündung zur L 360 und an der Einmündung zur Homburger Straße stehen Straßennamenschilder mit der Aufschrift: Am Roßberg.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen  
Anton
eggie (2024-09-01 14:30:22+00:00): Je zou ook een highway=pedestrian met area=yes kunnen maken en daar die basketbal en andere attributen in kunnen mappen. 
Nu lijkt dit allemaal het veld. 
gr eggie
HellMap (2024-09-01 14:13:03+00:00): Hello,

You reversed the direction of these two roads segments and now they are incorrect. This is the only change you did, so I am not sure what you intended to do here?
bxl-forever (2024-09-01 15:24:26+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for some improvements here but here is a general recommendation: please do not repeat addresses on POI in Belgium; we work hard to have a clean address system with unique addresses either on buildings, or on address points.  I will clean this up.
ItsOnlyJeff (2024-09-01 13:59:27+00:00): Ik heb geprobeerd een multi polygon te maken. Heb ik dit zo op de juiste manier gedaan?
eggie (2024-09-01 14:28:06+00:00): Yep.. prima gelukt.
Groet eggie
ItsOnlyJeff (2024-09-01 18:26:29+00:00): Top! Noord west van het eiland is een vlot die je handmatig naar de andere kant van het water moet trekken. Hoe zou ik deze het beste kunnen taggen?
eggie (2024-09-01 18:43:28+00:00): Voor kinderen? Formeel is het een trekpontje.. dus als je bij ferry kijkt vind je wel hoe en wat... maar echt een veerdienst is het ook niet.
Ik heb zo n speelding ook wel eens gemapt.. maar daar kwam commentaar op.
Zal een zoeken of dat pontje nog bestaat.
eggie (2024-09-01 18:46:03+00:00): Dit zijn van die speeldingen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.761229/4.692140
Het is even behelpen.. want heb alleen een mobiel.
eggie (2024-09-01 18:48:16+00:00): En hier een officieel trekpontje
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.776063/4.902755
trigpoint (2024-09-01 17:08:27+00:00): Really?
trigpoint (2024-09-01 17:13:28+00:00): Unclassified in the middle of nowhere?
No gps or Strava traces
No connection to existing traces
Not added buildings
Cryptic unreadable hashtags
ceirios (2024-09-01 18:47:16+00:00): I'd also like to question why "iaith" (language) is a hashtag here, too.

You're adding these roads and buildings but not adding any name:cy tags.
rupertmaesglas (2024-09-02 12:38:40+00:00): Thanks for this. All edits will undergo a validation process, but I shall go and see the exact status of that track shortly, in person. I have undcerstood the convention in Wales to be name=[welsh/local name], name:en=[name in English]. That would be in keeping with the cultural norms/ethical requirements here in Wales. The project is a language project. It is specifically naming local places where possible. I can take off individual hashtags is desired, and apologies if this is inappropriate.
rupertmaesglas (2024-09-02 13:41:49+00:00): @ceirios, we intend to add placenames as we go along, and need the building shapes to navigate wehn surveying.
We would welcome your advice, and are keen to collaborate with you as a local. Please be in touch. Thanks
user_21425661 (2024-09-04 16:10:52+00:00): Interestingly I think I can see a connection between https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12149852701#map=19/52.340583/-3.803238 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1417961073#map=19/52.339763/-3.800892 but yeah, not highway=unclassified and it could have been better connected to the existing track.
Romwriter (2024-09-16 18:15:01+00:00): Hallo gondolfius, gibt es hier wirklich keinen Radweg neben der Fahrbahn? Beste Grüße, Romwriter
gondolfius (2024-09-16 21:29:09+00:00): Nein, nicht neben der Fahrbahn als Teil des ways. Aber separat daneben: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492840560
Romwriter (2024-09-18 17:52:59+00:00): Alles klar, danke für die Antwort. Dann ändere ich "cycleway:right" von "no" auf "separate". Beste Grüße, Romwriter
eggie (2024-09-01 14:27:04+00:00): Het pad heb ik losgemaakt van de grens Pollense Veen.
MVG
eggie
ThijsOsm (2024-09-01 17:02:04+00:00): Dankjewel!
DUGA (2024-10-19 19:00:45+00:00): That’s not how you map vacant facilities.
VA00 (2025-07-25 06:34:56+00:00): Jaka jest logika ustawiania tych fragmencików jako tertiary? Jako wjazd na Zakopiankę?
szalona_entropia (2025-07-25 12:05:34+00:00): Tak, tertiary się nie powinna urywać w losowym miejscu zwłaszcza jeśli zaraz obok jest połączenie z DK47.
trigpoint (2024-09-01 16:53:20+00:00): Hi
Please be careful not to duplicate existing objects, take a few seconds to look at the map and check if the object already exists.

Cheers Phil
rupertmaesglas (2024-09-02 14:07:56+00:00): Hi Phil,
Thanks for this. See other message. Bit of guidance: Woodpeck has been seeing a lot of issues with edits here, and I'm not sure what pleatform messages are being sent on. Forst I knew was a ban. I'm struggling to understand how the message platforms work, and can't see how to see changeset comments more than this type of one from you.
trigpoint (2024-09-02 14:15:13+00:00): Messages notifications appear at the top right of openstreetmap.org page when you are logged in. You are also notified via your registered email address.
Changeset comments (such as this) are also notified via your registered email address.

Hope this helps
Phll
fortera_au (2024-09-02 04:44:53+00:00): Hi, is this name signposted or is it just descriptive? If it's signposted, it should be in correct case.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156057673
fortera_au (2024-09-02 04:44:06+00:00): Hi, name shouldn't be descriptive.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156057721
fortera_au (2024-09-02 04:41:56+00:00): Hi, is industrial=works the correct tag? There isn't much documentation on it from what I can find. It also looks like the way doesn't correctly cover the area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156057786
Penegal (2025-07-02 16:56:30+00:00): Hello, townlion!

I noticed your updates near Moyenmoutier, and wondered: why don't you use the same points on two adjacent (multi)polygons, for instance here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1312619373

Keeping a slight buffer between adjacent polygons gives one the impression that there is an unidentified something between them, which may be useful when there is, say, a hedge, but when there is nothing, is that not basically cluttering the database with near-identical, near-redundant polygon points? What is the added value for keeping such a buffer?
Scout Jens (2025-07-04 08:10:17+00:00): Hello Penegal,
I'm doing it this way to facilitate further adjustments, especially in areas where usage has only been represented in a very rudimentary way.

I don't think this will significantly increase the database's load. It only adds one more position per node. The additional data is necessary for the display anyway.

Best regards, Jens
Penegal (2025-07-04 16:02:47+00:00): Hello, Jens.

I understand the facilitation thing, but still, it maps the landuses and natural polygons as having buffers between areas, whereas nothing exists there.

When mapping so, the map basically says "Here is an unknown feature between these areas, I keep room for it and someone else will map it.", but often there is no such unknown feature. Sounds somehow wrong to me; that's basically downgrading map precision just for mapper practicality.
Scout Jens (2025-07-07 11:42:51+00:00): Hello Penegal,
Thank you for your thoughts on the topic.
I believe my changes have significantly improved the representation of the area. Otherwise, I wouldn't have made them.
Gluing areas together isn't a universal consensus.
I also can't imagine anyone mapping something in the very narrow spaces just because there are spaces.
Penegal (2025-07-07 16:05:24+00:00): Oh, I have no doubt that you globally improved the modelling of the area! ;-)
eggie (2024-09-01 14:44:37+00:00): Commentaar moet zijn landuse losgemaakt van track
fortera_au (2024-09-02 04:40:53+00:00): Hi, industrial=domes doesn't seem to be a documented tag, and is this name actually signed there or is it just descriptive?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156057876
trial (2024-09-01 15:27:41+00:00): brand=Tesla, Inc. ? Pourquoi écrivent-ils TESLA partout si leur marque n'est pas Tesla ?
fortera_au (2024-09-02 04:39:11+00:00): Hi, this looks like it should be squared off by pressing Q in iD or JOSM, and the way should only cover the car wash area itself, not the driveway. It also shouldn't be tagged as building=yes since it's not a building. The name should also be capitalised correctly too.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156057942
fortera_au (2024-09-02 04:39:36+00:00): Hi, the name should be capitalised correctly, not all caps.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156057968
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-05 22:43:23+00:00): Please provide sources
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156057991
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-05 22:26:29+00:00): Please don't delete features
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156058464
amacmcgrann (2024-09-06 04:51:31+00:00): I sent you a message.
fortera_au (2024-09-02 04:37:16+00:00): Hi, name should not be used for descriptive purposes, and a few of these definitely seem like they're tagged incorrectly.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156058683
fortera_au (2024-09-02 04:36:12+00:00): Hi, is barrier=field_boundary a valid tag at all? Doesn't seem to be mentioned in the wiki, I think this probably should be tagged differently.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156058789
HellMap (2024-09-01 16:22:55+00:00): Sveiki,

Kā šeit var sanākt vienāds `smoothness` gan pilnīgi gludam asfaltētam ceļam https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102681992 gan nesen izraktam ar granti nobērtam ceļam https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102681986 ? Vai te kaut kas ir mainījies pavisam nesen vai kā?
Reinis Bērziņš (2024-09-02 10:09:53+00:00): Sveiks! Atvaino un paldies par vērību! Nokļūdījos. Jā, abos dienvidu un dienvidrietumu Langaskrastu mikrorajonos vismaz pirms pāris nedēļām vēl bija gluds asfalts. Izlaboju asfaltētos ceļus uz smoothness=excellent.
HellMap (2024-09-02 11:05:59+00:00): Skaidrs, paldies par precizējumu. Es te nesen izbraucu (bet Mapillary bildes vēl nav ielādētas). Jā, asfalti tur it kā visur `excellent`, bet Ziemeļu pusē uz to brīdi bija aktīvi būvdarbi un ceļi sarakti.
Washing Gloating (2024-09-01 15:07:17+00:00): I put wrong link. This change resolves this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3886936
fortera_au (2024-09-02 04:34:57+00:00): Hi, the operator should just be Nyrstar (not all caps too), the capacity should just be a number, not 100+, and the surface should just be asphalt or concrete. You also should square off the larger parking area by pressing Q in iD or JOSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156058990
vimacs_hacks (2024-09-02 12:09:33+00:00): 地图上之前已经有364路的数据，建议你使用这个页面已有的公交关系：
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:%E5%8C%97%E4%BA%AC%E5%85%AC%E4%BA%A4
fortera_au (2024-09-02 04:32:36+00:00): Hi, building=yes should only be tagged if the way includes only the building itself.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156059092
Jordi MF (2024-09-03 11:55:25+00:00): Hola Barnias,

Como sabrás, los nombres de los centros educativos deben de escribirse completos. Por lo tanto, acortar su nombre es incorrecto. Si tienes dudas, puedes publicarlas en el foro de la comunidad de OSM: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-01 21:33:04+00:00): Multipolygons are areas. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area
eggie (2024-09-02 14:17:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
silversurfer83 (2024-09-01 19:42:03+00:00): Moin

Meinst du? Ich fand die Beschreibung noch fast neutral.

Gruß
Silversurfer83
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-01 21:32:57+00:00): Multipolygons are areas. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area
osmviborg (2024-09-01 19:29:21+00:00): Adresse- punkterne i Havneby fik også et 'lit=yes'
aceman444 (2024-11-01 12:20:37+00:00): Why do you put outdoor_seating=no on every building, that does not even have any amenity (like a restaurant) that could have outdoor seating?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-01 21:32:51+00:00): Multipolygons are areas. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area
stasiu512 (2024-09-02 21:25:32+00:00): Przy ul. Wodnika nie jest to DDR a chodnik z dopuszczonym ruchem rowerowym, zgodnie ze znakami C-16 i T-22, brak znaku C-13
czebureks (2024-09-03 11:52:32+00:00): Dzięki za komentarz. Przyjmuję tę argumentację.
ivanbranco (2025-01-04 20:55:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12150011191

There's something wrong with the denotation tag here...
ivanbranco (2025-01-04 21:59:50+00:00): The tag has been fixed just after my comment by another user
Gazer75 (2025-05-27 23:20:53+00:00): Still closed? No info on https://www.vegvesen.no/trafikk
EvenEvneNeve (2025-07-12 11:47:21+00:00): Opened again end of November 2024. https://www.mittloerenskog.no/e6-pakjoringen-har-endelig-apnet-for-trafikk/s/5-129-105139
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-01 21:32:43+00:00): Multipolygons are areas. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area
marc__marc (2024-09-12 09:22:13+00:00): vous êtes libre de supprimer directement vous-même le banc s'il n'existe plus en sélectionnant l'objet puis la douche "del" du clavier
Carto'Cité (2024-11-11 12:03:24+00:00): Bonjour Hydrel,
Merci pour tes contributions sur les aménagements cyclables. Je suis tombé sur cet article qui semble montrer la piste que tu as ajoutée : https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=909777487849366&set=pcb.909807277846387
Apparemment elle est unidirectionnelle et elle est rattachée à la chaussée. Je pense que tant que nous n'avons pas de photo aérienne précise ou de plan de recollement il vaut mieux la décrire en cycleway:right=track. Je me permets de modifier dans ce sens et si tu as la moindre information supplémentaire n'hésite pas à m'en parler.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Hydrel (2024-11-11 13:51:20+00:00): D'accord je pensais que tracer le chemin était recommandé. Je passe pas loin cet après midi si tu souhaites des photos de l'aménagement.
Carto'Cité (2024-11-11 15:55:15+00:00): Merci pour ton retour. 
Oui c'est généralement recommandé de faire un tracé indépendant mais là on est dans un cas où vraiment la voix cyclable semble être collée à la chaussée, et à sens unique et comme on ne connaît pas encore bien le tracé en terme de géométrie, ça vaut le coup de le laisser en track en attendant d'avoir une photo aérienne à jour ou des plans de récollement. Mais sinon tout était nickel je te remercie 🙂
Charles
Hydrel (2024-11-12 03:09:46+00:00): Je me suis rendu sur place, la piste cyclable débute très exactement en face du café le Marigny et s'achève juste avant le passage piéton de l'angle rue des Capucines/Fernand Lefebvre. 
Avant et après cette piste et sur le coté opposé il y a des pictogrammes, la documentation semble recommander cycleway:lane=pictogram.
Carto'Cité (2024-11-12 07:34:55+00:00): Merci pour les informations. Si tu ne connais pas en Panoramax c'est parfait pour y mettre des photos des rues pour contribuer à OSM ; à l'aide d'OpenCamera par exemple (il y a des tutoriels) 🙂
cycleway:lane=pictogram est utilisé en complément d'un cycleway:left/right/both=l'âne quand un espace (on pourrait dire une bande) est en partie ou totalement réservée aux cyclistes. Les simples rappels de la présence de cyclistes sont des cycleway:right/left/both=shared_lane.
Charles
Hydrel (2024-11-12 13:25:04+00:00): Je connais juste Panoramax de nom. Souhaites tu faire les modifications?
Carto'Cité (2024-11-12 13:43:56+00:00): J'ai fait les modifications. Le rendu viendra bientôt sur CyclOSM.

Pour Panoramax je ne peux que te conseiller de contribuer. Des photos de terrain apporte tellement plus d'informations et de gains de temps que n'importe quelle autre source de données (bon il faut aussi de la photo aérienne évidemment). La contribution n'est pas quelque chose de particulièrement compliqué avec l'expérience et avec un outil comme JOSM. Ce qui prend du temps, c'est comprendre une situation et tout particulièrement avec les aménagements cyclables pour lesquels tous les détails de signalétique horizontale et verticale comptent. Donc si tu es équipé d'un actioncam type GoPro ou si tu as la possibilité d'utiliser ton téléphone pour faire des séries de photos (avec Open Camera par exemple en attendant une application Panoramax), c'est vraiment génial d'avoir ensuite des photos récentes du terrain. En plus Panoramax est maintenant intégré à l'éditeur iD qui tu utilises 🙂
À bientôt et n’hésite pas si tu as d'autres questions.
Charles
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-01 21:31:20+00:00): Multipolygons are areas. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-02 01:26:31+00:00): On 2024-09-01 23:57:39 UTC Blixt99 wrote:

> I have played golf on this very course many times over the decades. Have you? Have you ever played golf? It is not correct to say that every green on the course is surrounded by fairway. The fairways typically run up to the front of the green. The green typically has a fringe area and maybe a light rough area surrounding, but definitely not fairway. The proper way to designate the green and fairway areas is shown in the Wiki here ---->https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
> 
> Please notice in the example that there can be shared nodes where the green meets the fairway, but they are both areas. The fairway is NOT a line, it is an area and should be tagged as an area just as the green is. Also note in the example that a sand trap, for instance, can be located in a fairway area as an area and the fairway area has the outer relationship while also tagged as golf=fairway and the sand trap has the inner relationship while also being tagged as golf=green.
> 
> Why does this mundane stuff even matter to you? All I ask is that you not make yourself the judge and jury and just follow the Wiki instructions. 
> 
> My main reason for imploring you to not keep reverting back to inaccurate designations is that I like to recreate all the golf courses I have played in my life in the 2K Games game known as PGA Tour 2K23 where the course designer built into the game needs Lidar elevation data from USGS and GPS data from OSM to recreate the holes accurately. All of the GPS data from OSM has to come from areas such as greens, sand traps, water hazards, tee boxes and fairways.
> 
> So please do not keep changing fairways from areas to lines. Thanks.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-02 01:27:09+00:00): Feel free to leave comments publicly so others may respond.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-02 01:28:29+00:00): I am well aware of your intent behind editing OSM and the related issues. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Problematic_mapping/golf
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-02 01:29:42+00:00): Tagging for the renderer is not ok. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-02 01:34:10+00:00): Please follow OSM guidelines instead of external forum posts.
https://tgctours.proboards.com/post/808477/thread
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-09-01 17:17:33+00:00): Sorry for creating huge changeset by mistake
gabro00 (2024-09-01 16:59:20+00:00): Szia! A created_by címke a szerkesztőprogram HTTP agent OSM megfelelője. Lásd még itt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:created%20by
Kérlek ne írd felül ilyen formában :)
miserend-hu (2024-09-01 19:37:11+00:00): Upsz. Bocsánat. A miserend.hu egyik szerkesztője adta meg, hogy ennek a templomnak "wheelchair:yes". És a miserend.hu saját php scriptje lép be az OSM-re és tölti fel az adatokat. (És nem egy klasszik történik.) Ebben az esetben akkor a created_by helyesen "miserend.hu" ugye? 
(A node és a description hibás felvitelét intézem, hogy ne legyen tovább ilyen.)
gabro00 (2024-09-01 20:10:53+00:00): Azt mondanám a "miserend.hu" önmagában még kevés. Valami olyat érdemes megadni, ami egyértelműen azonosítja a feltöltőszkriptet és adott esetben szólni tudunk, hogy ezzel a konkrét verzióval volt gond.
Én ezt venném alapul: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/User-Agent

Pl. miserend/<verziószám> (<rövid git hash>).

További érdekes címke lehet a bot=yes/no, attól függően átnézed-e mielőtt felkerül az adatbázisba. Erről itt olvashatsz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits
miserend-hu (2024-09-01 21:25:57+00:00): OK. Formálom akkor tovább a created_by -t. Meg a akkor a comment -t is hogy jobban érthető legyen.
A bot=yes/no-t néztem. Azt hiszem nem vagyok bot mert mindegyik változtatást konkrét személy hozza létre, egyesével minden változást.
Köszi a velem foglalkozást.
gabro00 (2024-09-02 09:04:43+00:00): Hmm. Tudok-e olyat, hogy a miserend.hu-ra belépve szkripttel elkezdek adatokat küldeni, ami automatikusan -felülvizsgálat nélkül- átkerül OSM-be?
miserend-hu (2024-09-02 09:13:16+00:00): Jelenleg olyat tudsz, hogy 
- miserend.hu -ra regisztráció után 
- egy-egy templomhoz kéred az adminisztrációs jogot, hogy adatokat módosíts
- és ha megkapod ezt a jogot
- akkor egyesével a saját miserend adatokon (service_times-hoz hasonlít, de sajnos (még?) nem osm kompatiblis adat) módosíts. véges számú meghatározott tag esetében, segítséggel és magyarázattal.
- és amikor rányom a "küldésre", akkor utána már nincs még egy személy felülvizsgálata. 

Szóval igazából jobban meg van szűrve, hogy ki módosíthat adatokat, mint magán az openstreetmap-en, mert nálunk kérvényezni kell adott templomhoz. (Amit különösebb ellenőrzés nélkül elfogadunk, ha nem tűnik biztosan gonosznak. Inkább utólag töröljük a randalírózott, hisz csak egy-egy templomon tud randalírozni. De erre még nem is volt példa 15 év alatt.)