piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Valerio Cardone (2025-11-26 21:01:24+00:00): Anche a me aveva fatto strano, ma poi cercando online ho scoperto che esiste una tolleranza per quanto riguarda i carrelli (in questo caso solo di un centimetro, permettendo alle vetture della Sassi-Superga la circolazione sulla rete ordinaria, ammettendo che abbiano scartamento diverso). Inoltre non si nota un restringimento dal piazzale del deposito Sassi ai binari della cremagliera, ma anche in questo caso, con poca differenza (anche perché si passa da binari a gola a binari a fungo). È possibilissimo che si tratti di un errore di trascrizione, cerco di chiedere nuovamente ai soci ATTS, ma per il momento che facciamo sulla mappa?
AwFi (2025-11-26 21:18:12+00:00): Però di solito la tolleranza è ±3mm in ambito ferroviario, se non sbaglio. 
Una volta qualche carro merci passava anche sulle linee tranviarie, mi sembra di averlo letto da qualche parte ma non ricordo dove, forse da ATTS. 
Però mi sembrerebbe proprio strano questo diverso scartamento per tutti i casini che comporta, se fossi a Torino andrei pure a misurarlo.
Secondo me resta più probabile il 1445 e terrei quello. Quando avrò tempo penso modificherò anche Wikipedia con le fonti che mi hanno suggerito.
Valerio Cardone (2025-11-27 06:06:47+00:00): Quindi rimetto 1445?
AwFi (2025-11-27 09:07:37+00:00): Vedi tu. Se pensi di avere una risposta rapida da ATTS secondo me puoi anche aspettare di avere la certezza prima di cambiare, sennò forse è meglio mettere 1445.
Valerio Cardone (2025-11-27 12:16:25+00:00): Allora aspetto, chiederò al Trolley Festival.
AwFi (2025-12-14 11:13:33+00:00): Ciao, sei riuscito a chiedere?
Valerio Cardone (2025-12-14 17:35:28+00:00): Purtroppo no, ho dato solo una sbirciatina al libro di ATTS sulla tranvia, ma non ho trovato nulla, a questo punto revertirei il changeset.
AwFi (2025-12-16 07:51:44+00:00): Va bene, se riesco a trovare uno di quei libri guardo i riferimenti che mi hanno dato.
felipeeugenio (2025-11-26 16:05:31+00:00): reversado
StC (2025-11-29 13:23:41+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là, en prolongeant un chemin au-delà de sa jonction avec le chemin suivant dans la relation. Je m'occupe de la réparation
ScantLeopard336 (2026-01-08 19:07:27+00:00): Good afternoon erickerr,

I was curious as to why you added tunnel tags to the roads crossing below the rail bridges around Harrison, NJ. My understanding is that it's preferred to use either the tunnel or bridge tag on the respective way, but not both.

Happy mapping,
Brian
Mashin (2025-11-26 11:01:24+00:00): Hi David,
just a question. What is the purpose of changing "white_black" to "white-black" in osmc:symbol?
David Reik (2025-11-26 12:16:47+00:00): I don't see that first field as being very important.  I just use that field for a brief description of the blaze the other fields describe.  I guess I use a hyphen rather than an underscore because hyphens are used, in standard written English, to join multiple words that, together, describe something.
Mashin (2025-11-27 17:03:44+00:00): Thanks for the explanation. That first part of osmc:symbol tag is to indicate what color the route should be "painted" on a hiking map. 

Since this tag is supposed to be machine readable and not interpreted directly by humans, can we stick to the underscore "_"? I introduced this character because it is already used as a value separator in the tag itself and hyphen adds another complexity.
David Reik (2025-11-28 00:59:52+00:00): I see this at https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#help-about
"waycolor:background
waycolor:background:foreground
waycolor:background:foreground:foreground2
waycolor:background:foreground:foreground2:text:textcolor
waycolor:background:foreground:text:textcolor
The waycolor must always be present but is ignored for this map. Furthermore you must specify a background, although you can leave the field empty. Next follow a maximum of two different foregrounds. In the end you may optionally add a small reference text to be added on top. The color of the text must always be specified. Note that waymarkedtrails will ignore reference texts when they become to long. How long the text can be depends on the chosen backgrounds: the hard limit is 4 characters, diamond-shaped background only take a single charaters, stripe- and bar-shaped backgrounds take no reference text at all."  Is there a map that does not ignore the content of the first field?
Mashin (2025-11-28 11:49:52+00:00): That is just how it is implemented in one map project. You have to look at our OSM documentation, because that is what other map projects will use as a reference:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:osmc:symbol

"waycolor - Name of the color in which the route path itself should be painted."

And yes there are maps that use it:
* https://osmapp.org/
* https://mapy.com
* OSMAnd app
* https://www.wanderreitkarte.de/
etc.
AgusQui (2025-12-04 03:31:37+00:00): No se mapean este tipo de cosas. En OSM se agregan elementos actuales, no posibles, pasados o futuros.
Jarek 🚲 (2025-12-17 15:51:08+00:00): Hi,

I have started a thread in the forum for discussion on road classification in southern Ontario https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/southern-ontario-road-classification-ongoing-thread/139281 - we're starting to discuss what the criteria for primary vs secondary should be in cities. I wanted to invite you to participate as you've been editing road categories in Ontario.

(You log into the forum with your OSM account, it's easy and doesn't require a separate signup)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-28 15:56:07+00:00): I fixed tagging a bit - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44581221/history
ColbyTheWorldTraveler (2026-02-24 19:52:36+00:00): Looks good! Welcome to OpenStreetMap! We're excited to have you here!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175131834
eggie (2025-11-26 07:30:19+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Bedankt voor uw wijziging.
Ik heb adresnode 83a teruggeplaatst.
Die was ergens anders terecht gekomen.

MVG
eggie
rarad74 (2025-11-26 13:46:54+00:00): Hi. Why you deleted data from the map without explanation? You are on a first edit and we could consider this vandalism.
user_5359 (2025-11-26 10:04:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look at the newest version. I'm not sure about the permission to drink beer and wine. I haven't been able to find out from history why these tags exist at a pharmacy.
SamosaMunch (2025-11-26 14:29:10+00:00): Thank you for the warm welcome user_5359!  I've been a little confused on what changes should be made for closed businesses and your new version is very helpful.

In regard to the drink beer and wine, I vaguely remember them selling it in cases and bottles alongside the other beverages from the fridge. Should the value be "retail" instead of "yes" in that case?
user_5359 (2025-11-26 20:02:22+00:00): You are welcome! 
Is the shop now closed or just the pharmacy? In neither version is there any mention of a shop next to the pharmacy that is also allowed to sell alcohol. And while we're at it: is the cash machine still in use or has it been removed?
SamosaMunch (2025-11-26 20:25:43+00:00): Ah I didn’t even think of that. The pharmacy was connected in the back to the shop. Both are completely closed with all their inventory and interior taken out! The whole space is now sitting empty and vacant.
aduxas (2026-01-06 16:30:36+00:00): This is not Ericson Place.  It's a private road.  ARCGIS does not show any public access here.  I suspect Google Maps is wrong too, and the only reason the name Ericson Place shows up on ARCGIS.  I find no independent trace of  Ericson place on any official RI website.
StreetSurveyor (2026-01-06 18:33:08+00:00): I only extended the name to the rest of the road because the portion already named in OSM didn’t cover the full road. Since the name Ericson Place was already present in OSM and also appeared in ARCGIS, it seemed reasonable to extend the existing named road rather than treat it as a separate, unnamed feature.
aduxas (2026-01-06 19:38:51+00:00): What I mean is that the reference on ARCGIS also comes from Google Maps.  Have a look at the official PVD street maps:  https://maps.providenceri.gov/2024/Providence-final-plots-2024-30x36_065.pdf
Not only is this section not even on the map; the name Ericson Place simply does not exist.
StreetSurveyor (2026-01-06 20:08:24+00:00): Thanks for the link — that’s helpful. Given that Ericson Place doesn’t appear on the official Providence street maps, and there were no signs present, I agree the name likely isn’t officially recognized. That said, I’ve removed the name until there’s clear municipal evidence or on-the-ground signage to support it.
aduxas (2026-01-06 20:49:39+00:00): Thanks.  What's interesting:  the first section of that road is a public road.  And so is the next road just to the West, next to the river.  It also is unnamed.  BTW the yellow dotted lines around Ericson Place mean "Inactive Parcel Lines" -- I suppose there is nothing to be learned here.
KennyDap (2025-11-26 07:27:26+00:00): Vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140349
MxxCon (2025-12-07 04:00:01+00:00): Hello.
Rather than delivery=partner, it's more correct to use delivery=yes and delivery:partner=* as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:delivery:partner
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175132721
Alliegaytor (2025-11-26 01:03:14+00:00): Hi,

In this situation the crossing tag should have been removed rather than the node itself as it was part of a building way.

I've restored the building geometry in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175133725
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-26 03:14:35+00:00): DWG revert - vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175135585
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-26 03:33:16+00:00): DWG revert - vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175135905
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-26 03:33:17+00:00): DWG revert - vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175135905
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-26 03:09:52+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19023
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-03 06:57:34+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432015
MxxCon (2025-11-26 18:14:22+00:00): "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175133410
MxxCon (2025-11-26 17:44:06+00:00): "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175133456
julcnx (2025-11-28 03:23:29+00:00): Thanks a lot for your contributions! Just a friendly tip: try to keep your changes smaller, like focusing on one country at a time. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
user_5359 (2025-11-26 10:22:17+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2gfe. Which colour did you mean?
j0hn33y (2025-11-26 15:24:08+00:00): Removed the bad colour tag, was having issues with iD entering weird info and resorted to copy/paste.
user_5359 (2025-11-26 10:53:37+00:00): Hello! You import 10 nodes with the tag amenity=school and
Distrito = Cidade de Tete
EP = true
ES1 = true
ES2 = false
Escola = Escola Básica Mateus Sansão Muthemba
Latitude = -16.163611111111098
Longitude = 33.572888888888897
Provincia = Tete
SchoolId = 90561
Source = Carta Escolar
TemElectricidade = true
TemInternet = true
comment = It's in the right location
validation_action = Correct location
validation_confidence = High
validation_status = Correct school location
What is the mean of the tags?

Nevertheless, please use yes / no instead of true / false!
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-26 05:51:40+00:00): Seehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19028
michel60 (2025-12-02 10:04:02+00:00): Bonjour,
Un bon outils pour bus relation c'est GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector qui visualise les erreurs des lignes de bus : voici le lien :
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.38842&lat=48.89949&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.93&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
Cordialement Michel
DressyPear4 (2025-11-26 15:38:35+00:00): Não adicione dados que não existem
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175134153
ilias_ (2025-11-26 09:52:01+00:00): Hi, why did you put one of the gates back to permissive and remove the private tag?
TaklamakanDesert (2025-11-26 17:26:19+00:00): Hello ilias_, this was an oversight on my part. I had forgotten that I’d already reviewed this area and somehow didn’t recognize it was the same feature we previously discussed. My sincere apologies for the confusion. I will change these back to access=private. Happy mapping!
ilias_ (2025-11-26 17:58:51+00:00): No worries, happens to the best of us!
OptikalCrow (2025-11-30 23:05:27+00:00): Hi there, it looks like Forest Friday Cheers is an event that takes place at Apocalypse Ale Works, not a permanent physical space. You can add the bitcoin related tags to the main Apocalypse Ale Works if you would like as well as adding information about the events space, but please do not create nodes specifically for events like this. Thanks.
KennyDap (2025-11-26 07:19:39+00:00): This is vandalism.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140137
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-27 00:25:40+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19036
KennyDap (2025-11-26 07:20:08+00:00): This is vandalism.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175140144
Udarian (2025-11-26 04:29:30+00:00): this alpr is in the middle of the road, please check its actual position and fix it.
aharvey (2026-02-26 06:14:58+00:00): was adding a street name to the residential area at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1206858534/history intentional? looks wrong to me.
jakecopp (2026-02-26 06:19:54+00:00): No that is certainly an error. Thanks for catching that - will fix it later tonight.
trigpoint (2025-11-26 20:46:01+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977
Comino (2025-11-26 11:12:14+00:00): All capital letters is not allowed. Please read new Wiki page: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Square-Merchants
joel56dt (2025-11-26 16:48:35+00:00): I have gone through this same process of realization.

I have been observing your mapping work and I want to say thanks for your contributions!
trigpoint (2025-11-26 20:45:59+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977
HAALAND_ (2026-03-04 07:23:50+00:00): Hi，jimmygu0611
请问您为何要删除位于“39.9313750, 119.5826957”的“宏魁家常菜”您认为此地点已经不存在了吗
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-03 06:54:19+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431925
trigpoint (2025-11-26 20:45:56+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977
trigpoint (2025-11-26 20:45:54+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977
trigpoint (2025-11-26 20:45:52+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-26 05:54:06+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19026
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-03 07:00:09+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175432095
MxxCon (2025-11-26 17:42:33+00:00): "City Pole" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175136829
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-03 06:51:18+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431827
Kovoschiz (2025-11-26 08:26:13+00:00): Hi can you please discuss this? This is to be consistent with the Kowloon `=city` , and the HKI `admin_level=5` 
There's already `place=state`  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/24330691
Otherwise Kowloon should be changed to eg `=region` (if "twin city" is not literal)
Kovoschiz (2025-11-26 08:26:36+00:00): Notice the `=city` is `admin_centre` , and `=state` the `label`
Rukkhadevata (2025-11-26 08:34:13+00:00): Hong Kong is divided into three traditional areas which do not have administrative status: HKI, Kowloon, and the New Territories. However, locals in Hong Kong seem to think that "Hong Kong" refers only to Hong Kong Island, while "Kowloon" is a separate part. Given that Hong Kong's situation differs from that of mainland China, where different districts within the same city have their own governments with real power, whereas in Hong Kong there are none, I think perhaps the place node "Kowloon" should be removed, or it should be changed to =region.
旧加卷 (2025-11-26 23:41:43+00:00): "place=city" does not necessarily have to be tied with the administration status?
Aleksandar Matejevic (2026-01-14 06:15:03+00:00): I think that Hong Kong Island node can not be admin_center but label of Hong Kong, and node of the city should have admin_center role because it is always a place which have administrative body controlling the area
MxxCon (2025-11-26 17:41:59+00:00): "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175137344
rarad74 (2025-11-26 12:15:29+00:00): Hi. Please add type of service roads and acces. Probably the most of them have private acces and driveway if acces is in some comercial areas. Living streets if need acces to private residential areas. Thanks.
WanakaLake (2025-12-01 15:42:06+00:00): Hi rarad74, thanks for reaching out!  

Unfortunately we generally do not add access=private tagging unless there is ground level imagery with signage, a visible gate in imagery, or verified documentation indicating such. Without that verification, we risk adding inaccurate tagging. I do see something in ESRI World Imagery that might be a gate, but it isn’t distinct enough to confirm from aerial imagery alone. If you have knowledge that this road is private, I’m happy to defer to your edits should you choose to add the private access tagging. 

I hope you have a nice day!
MxxCon (2025-11-26 17:40:54+00:00): "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
Please provide supporting evidence that these cameras are operated by MTA, an agency that runs NYC's subways and buses...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175137565
MxxCon (2025-11-26 17:40:36+00:00): "Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
Please provide supporting evidence that these cameras are operated by MTA, an agency that runs NYC's subways and buses...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175137580
pertile (2026-01-14 12:04:15+00:00): This road was on construction until today, but you set it as finished two months ago. Also this set a way as oneway while the other one was two way.
SaltonSea (2026-01-19 01:51:45+00:00): Hello pertile,

The imagery I used appeared to show the road as open, but looking at it again I can tell construction was still underway. It also showed no oneway evidence, but I will pay more attention to context when updating those tags.
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:49:49+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Plumber in Toronto and Greater Toronto Area"
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:49:49+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-16 17:04:24+00:00): 🔴 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176015410
Hidden Mountain (2025-11-26 11:54:51+00:00): Если меняете основное название на казахский, то необходимо продублировать его в поле name:kk
Fizzie-DWG (2025-11-26 06:07:02+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19029
Fizzie-DWG (2025-12-03 06:51:19+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175431827
naruton (2026-05-14 13:45:11+00:00): 現実に即した内容に書き換えていただきありがとうございます。
ただ、この編集の結果、四条通を東向きに走るバス路線のリレーションから統合された区間のウェイの情報が抜け落ちてしまっています。
そちらで修正いただく必要はありませんが(私がするので)、今後気を付けていただきましたら幸いです。
literan (2025-11-26 19:50:42+00:00): и зачем это? level это этаж в здании. Тут нет здания
trigpoint (2025-11-26 20:45:49+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977
trigpoint (2025-11-26 20:45:47+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977
Fraxi (2025-11-26 08:30:04+00:00): Двата обекта "Гибко" дублират ли се?
Dimitar155 (2025-11-26 09:41:28+00:00): Не се дублират, две отделни локации са. И на двете има указания как да се стигне до втората, ако първата е заключена :).
trigpoint (2025-11-26 20:45:44+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977
DimaLebedev (2026-01-26 08:03:31+00:00): #mapbox_missing_roads
jbcharron (2025-11-30 13:19:41+00:00): Bonjour,
Les noms dans OSM ne doivent pas être écrits en majuscule, pouvez-vous appliquer les règles présentes dans le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names ?
Merci
Jean-Baptiste
Mwax_UwU (2025-11-26 18:04:05+00:00): Il y a déjà une traversée cyclable avec feu indiquée à cet endroit
trigpoint (2025-11-26 20:45:42+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977
trigpoint (2025-11-26 20:45:40+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175170977
mcliquid (2025-11-26 12:13:37+00:00): Hello ODP 95570, thanks for your edits with iD.

A quick remark: this changeset includes modifications in two completely separate areas — Paris/Cergy and Oletta on Corsica. Even though the edits were small, combining distant locations into one changeset makes it difficult for other mappers to understand or review the changes.

I’ve already corrected the misplaced node in Paris, but for future edits it would be best to:

keep each changeset focused on one local area,

upload before moving on to a different region,

and double-check for accidentally added nodes.

More information here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for your understanding and happy mapping!
fortera_au (2025-11-29 08:29:49+00:00): Hi, this seems like tagging for the renderer. Is this actually water, or is it meant to just be a wetland?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175139648
eggie (2025-11-26 07:32:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

De formats voor bv openingstijden liggen vast. Zie wiki. De taal is altijd UK English
Gebruik anders deze tool: 
openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/


MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-11-26 07:36:42+00:00): Openingstijden hersteld
Barlage Computer Hardware (2025-11-26 14:19:49+00:00): Wanneer is deze zichtbaar?
Bij klant op de site nog niet zichtbaar namelijk
eggie (2025-11-26 14:30:37+00:00): Dag Barlage..

Op de standaardkaart direct zichtbaar. Soms helpt cache leegmaken van de browser ctrl f5 een paar keer.
Sommige apps moeten eerst hun update hebben. Dat verschilt.
Mvg
eggie