piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 14:49:49+00:00): Thank you for your prompt response and for clarifying that the location is for a legitimate business. I appreciate your contribution to the map!

The reason why your changeset was flagged is that the description used is quite detailed and reads similarly to promotional content, which can sometimes be interpreted as SEO-related.

To keep OSM useful and neutral, it’s best to provide concise and factual descriptions without promotional language. A simpler version would be more suitable and help avoid any misunderstandings.

Thanks once again for your understanding and for helping to keep the map accurate and useful!
SomeoneElse2 (2025-02-27 10:15:28+00:00): It looks like one of these changes broke at least one relation - "12458163 | Kilconny ED".  I've fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163005426 - does everything still look OK?
AdrianLangtry (2025-02-27 10:27:33+00:00): Sorry about that, I think it appeared to be a duplicate line where the river area meets the lake and I removed the wrong line there, otherwise I'm not sure what could have happened. Looks good now
SomeoneElse (2025-02-27 10:30:14+00:00): Thanks
Vinber-Pro (2025-02-28 11:09:41+00:00): Please, could you stop to make this kind of modifications ?

do you receive mail ?

regards
pahlavi_temecula (2025-03-08 03:28:22+00:00): 1. You mean “around the world” datasets or adding tiny amenities from mediawiki?
2. Just started checking my inbox.
Vinber-Pro (2025-03-08 04:55:27+00:00): around the world it's a good thing :)

but 2 point of interest, one in Malysia, one in est-europa and everybody in this area knows your changeset, it's not a good practice.

For your comment, perhaps you can read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#How_should_I_write_Changeset_Comments?

it's very important you answered, thank you very much !

regards
Geo-Tobi (2025-04-07 19:57:32+00:00): Bei diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23600472
,und den beiden parallel liegenden Wegen, hast du traffic_sign mit 260 getagged, aber es fehlt das motor_vehicle Tag. Da kann was nicht stimmen. Bitte nochmal prüfen.
Geo-Tobi (2025-04-07 19:59:00+00:00): Bei dem hier ist's auch verschwunden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239039041
Wegeschlenzer (2025-04-08 19:37:45+00:00): stimmt, erledigt.
Geo-Tobi (2025-04-09 19:32:51+00:00): Hattest du meine zweite Anmerkung auch wahrgenommen? 
Auf diesem Weg hier ist motor_vehicle ebenfalls verschwunden https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239039041
toeklk (2025-09-29 19:15:25+00:00): Hi, is it possible that you made a typo in the name?  AFAICT the name should be Lombot?
Macumba Macaca (2025-09-30 07:52:49+00:00): Looks like it! I fixed it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172647348#map=16/50.38291/4.39305
ZLima12 (2025-02-28 05:09:13+00:00): Hello,

This does not look to be the actual name of this area. Additionally, you removed the wetlands tag, which should not be done even if there was a name to add.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162979557
NeisBot (2025-02-27 09:36:01+00:00): Hi StuttgartNan, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.

Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 64 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.

To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps others understand and follow your adjustments more easily. You can find guidance on good changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Thanks!

PS: I've also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Supaplex (2025-04-18 02:05:41+00:00): Hi KvardeX OSM

Can you explain why do you change the name of the water body to the old Soviet time name?

The OpenStreetMap project is a collaborate project with everyone's contribute matters. If you think something is wrong and violate the common sense or best practice, you should have a conversation with other to discuss the issue. Not just change things according to your way.

Dennis Raylin Chen
Data Working Group
data@osmfoundation.org
[Ticket#2025041810000037 ]
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162979826
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 20:46:15+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting some mapped ways?

Thanks.
sanchit3008 (2025-03-01 01:21:54+00:00): Hello, I goto this place often and I can confirm there exists no such pathway as was marked in the map.
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 20:46:19+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting some mapped ways?

Thanks.
AERAEW (2025-02-28 22:12:01+00:00): Property has changed ownership and land use has changed
IvicaBanovac (2025-02-27 11:11:41+00:00): Reverted because of wrong tagging #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163007663
Nar_ach (2025-04-24 11:14:54+00:00): Hello Wulfmorn, Thank you for your contribution. Make sure to edit the data in a complex way - I restored a relation way 1245921693 after you removed duplicated highway. Happy Mapping!
Sylabowy Kot (2025-02-26 17:27:47+00:00): Nie byłem w środku, ale widziałem przez bramę południową od strony lasku, że jest to teren ROD Piaski.
Source: survey.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-02-26 17:35:23+00:00): A, i to nie tak, że ogrodzenie zlikwidowano. Po prostu obszar lepiej wygląda bez krechy w poprzek, jeśli i tak nie ma zmappowanej całej reszty infrastruktury wewnętrznej, czego mi się nie chce robić.
txemt (2025-02-27 17:50:57+00:00): I sent you a message on Slack, I'm still awaiting a response.
Trevor_1 (2025-02-27 21:06:51+00:00): I just saw it and responded. I need to turn my Slack notifications back on
pwbriggs (2026-02-25 19:38:44+00:00): Hey, a couple of noexit=yes nodes were removed from your changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178925235. Could you confirm that those weren't correct? What did you intend by noexit=yes in the middle of a way? Did you intend to add a barrier=gate access=no or something similar?

Thanks
tjasz (2026-02-25 20:21:24+00:00): Thanks for checking on this. The noexit=yes tags did not originate with me, although I must have made this changeset in a way that did not preserve their prior history, unfortunately.

Now that I understand the purpose of noexit=yes, I think the existing access=no on the two westbound creekside paths should be sufficient. The barrier is not a gate. The fence/handrail for the bridge runs from n5421855127 to n11232818978 and there are signs on that fence restricting access to the westbound paths behind it.

I can try to get updated Mapillary images next time I am in Chambers Creek.
pwbriggs (2026-02-25 23:26:34+00:00): cool, thanks for confirming!
tjasz (2026-03-02 18:14:09+00:00): New mapillary imagery is available for the trail connecting the north and south trailheads at the east end of the canyon.
Andrea Musuruane (2025-02-27 09:28:57+00:00): Ciao. Immagino che branch=Supermercati sia un "fix" di ID che non e' stato verificato....
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162981859
nick1993 (2025-02-27 17:39:02+00:00): Confermo, errore di id nel mentre sistemavo i brand:wikidata, non me ne ero neanche accorto, tolgo?
Andrea Musuruane (2025-02-27 19:17:52+00:00): Ho corretto io! Ciao!
silversurfer83 (2025-02-26 19:47:22+00:00): Hello abester,

what's in that place now? Is there a vacant shop? In that case changing the tags to either
shop=vacant
or
disused:shop=yes
would be better. I already explained keep the history and the lifecycle prefixes so please try and adhere to these guidelines. Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162981944
abester (2025-03-03 16:59:46+00:00): nope, someone has yet to rent this whole building
silversurfer83 (2025-03-03 20:11:26+00:00): thank you for clarifying.

this is a way this can be tagged without deleting the object:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11511812561
RCRalph (2025-02-26 17:45:37+00:00): LGTM
impiaaa (2025-03-25 00:47:46+00:00): Hello, thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! Please read about what the "place=town" and "place=hamlet" tags mean in OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place . Both Panoche and Llanada have fewer than 100 inhabitants, so place=hamlet is correct, and place=town is incorrect.
IvicaBanovac (2025-02-27 11:08:29+00:00): Reverted because of wrong tagging #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163007562
VLD549 (2025-04-07 13:21:19+00:00): Hi, I was asked to verify name changes. Could you provide a link of some sort that states the name to be Hoogeboogaerdsvoetweg ? 
I can't seem to find it anywhere, nor Google/Bing, nor Bing Maps.

Thank you!
queerthoughts (2025-04-07 18:44:16+00:00): The source is the street name sign on site, as indicated in the changeset source: survey. (It's placed at where the path joins Hulststraat.)

The absence of a path name online doesn't mean it's inaccurate; in fact, OSM prioritises ground truth.
VLD549 (2025-05-13 15:40:37+00:00): Thank you.
archpdx (2025-03-05 05:02:27+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163228139
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-26 18:11:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93283981
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96148594

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rempshaener (2025-02-26 19:08:32+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.

Näheres zum Tagging von Trafos (Kompaktstationen oder separate Gebäude) findest du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:power%3Dsubstation#Beispiele

D.h. ich vermute mal dass es dann

man_made=street_cabinet
utility=power
power=substation
substation=minor_distribution

oder 

building=service
utility=power
power=substation
substation=minor_distribution

ist.

Wenn du den Umriss noch rechtwinklig machen möchtest: einfach auswählen und „Q“ drücken.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Minh Nguyen (2025-03-01 18:54:59+00:00): Please remember to square the corners of buildings that you draw by hand. You can press the Q key to square corners quickly.
VA00 (2025-10-29 19:47:19+00:00): Coś nie wyszedł ten rewert... Autor zmiany dosyć mętnie, ale napisał o co mu chodzi, albo raczej czego nie zrozumiał: miejscowość nazywa się Kamień, a to zapewne wersja w jakimś innym języku  .
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 19:30:59+00:00): spróbowałem trochę bardziej go wycofać w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176110482
wielandb (2025-03-15 13:00:31+00:00): Hi,
du hast bei ein paar Radwegen foot=no zu foot=yes geändert. Warum? Bin gerade daran vorbei gefahren und an foot=no hat sich nichts geändert. 
VG
Wieland
wielandb (2025-03-15 21:25:12+00:00): Siehe auch Notiz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4665848
cyankahly (2025-03-23 13:53:27+00:00): Ich war da einem Irrtum erlegen, sorry.
grzegorz75jan (2025-02-26 20:15:39+00:00): Poprawiłem bo przestawił ci się węzeł pociągając ze sobą budynek i chodnik
https://postimg.cc/gallery/347mh6R
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162983078
eggie (2025-02-26 18:34:19+00:00): Even als hulp kort door de bocht
amenity=school voor basisschool en VO.
=college voor MBO
=university voor HBO en universiteit.
Je kunt ook de adresnodes gebruiken om de amenity=college te taggen. 
Scholen kunnen of vele manieren. 
Er is zelfs een aparte tag voor campus.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2025-02-26 18:37:20+00:00): Nog een tip... Gebruik de bestaande adresnodes om op bij te taggen. Je hoeft geen adressen aan te maken.
NieWnen (2025-02-26 18:45:42+00:00): Nie wiem co miała na celu ta zmiana, ale zostały błędnie przesunięte granice administracyjne – zmiana musiała zostać wycofana.

Błędnych draftów też nie publikujemy, a przynajmniej to wynika z opisu zmiany.
felipeeugenio (2025-02-27 12:39:58+00:00): Hello.
You can square tue buildings with the Q letter on the keyboard. That way you can obtain 90° angles.
regards
felipeeugenio (2025-02-27 12:39:49+00:00): Hello.
You can square tue buildings with the Q letter on the keyboard. That way you can obtain 90° angles.
regards
Brooklynpeppo (2025-02-26 18:41:11+00:00): Learn OSM #URP535
Brooklynpeppo (2025-02-26 18:42:17+00:00): Learn OSM #URP535
NeisBot (2025-02-27 05:01:53+00:00): Hi ManaSade, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear, difficult to understand, or consistently repetitive.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-27 19:44:06+00:00): Wow, what a creative use of hashtags! 

I almost thought I was reading a social media post instead of an OSM changeset comment. 

If only there were a way to explain what exactly was mapped or edited—imagine how much easier it would be for others to follow along. 

But hey, who needs clarity when you can have an alphabet soup of project codes, right?
</ironic>

#hotosm
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 14:24:44+00:00): I must now apologize retrospectively for my previous comment. It was sent too quickly by me out of emotion, without taking enough time to think it over. I would be glad if you continued to actively contribute to the OSM project. 

#HappyMapping
b-jazz (2025-02-27 03:51:58+00:00): Hey there ER, thanks for working on golf course contributions for OSM. We appreciate the map getting filled out.

There is a problem with how you're mapping though (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1363133822). You are making the fairway (and rough) intersect/partial-overlap with the green which isn't how they are supposed to be mapped. You either need to butt the fairway up against the green and share common nodes, or you need to surround the green (if there is visible fringe matching the fairway) and turn the fairway/green pair into a multipolygon ("Merge" features in iD). Please see the wiki for more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course and feel free to reach out with any questions you have. Thanks.
ERawlsy (2025-02-27 04:07:29+00:00): Apologies i will get this corrected
NeisBot (2025-02-27 05:01:55+00:00): Hi ToniOlsen, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear, difficult to understand, or consistently repetitive.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-27 19:44:19+00:00): Wow, what a creative use of hashtags! 

I almost thought I was reading a social media post instead of an OSM changeset comment. 

If only there were a way to explain what exactly was mapped or edited—imagine how much easier it would be for others to follow along. 

But hey, who needs clarity when you can have an alphabet soup of project codes, right?
</ironic>

#hotosm
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 14:24:50+00:00): I must now apologize retrospectively for my previous comment. It was sent too quickly by me out of emotion, without taking enough time to think it over. I would be glad if you continued to actively contribute to the OSM project. 

#HappyMapping
felipeeugenio (2025-02-27 12:39:33+00:00): Hello.
You can square tue buildings with the Q letter on the keyboard. That way you can obtain 90° angles.
regards
IvicaBanovac (2025-02-27 16:28:10+00:00): Reverted because of wrong tags #OptimoRoute

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163019950
felipeeugenio (2025-02-27 13:16:56+00:00): Hello.
You can square the buildings with the Q letter on the keyboard. That way you can obtain 90° angles.
regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162984745
felipeeugenio (2025-02-27 12:39:41+00:00): Hello.
You can square tue buildings with the Q letter on the keyboard. That way you can obtain 90° angles.
regards
NeisBot (2025-02-27 05:01:26+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
habi (2025-02-28 11:15:38+00:00): Ciao MappSurfer

Gerade z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1363145545 sieht auf den Luftbildern nicht wirklich nach bestehendem Geleise mehr aus.
Kannst du dich noch an unsere Diskussion erinnern, dass in OpenStreetMap *keine* `abandoned:railway=rail` *neu* erfasst werden sollten, wenn diese in der Realität nicht mehr existieren?
Oder warst du persönlich hier in der Gegend und hast 'on the ground' gesehen, dass die Geleise noch da sind?

Gruss,
habi
MappSurfer (2025-03-04 20:11:26+00:00): Hallo habi

Das von dir angesprochene abgebaute Gleis ist, meiner Meinung nach, auf den Esri- und Bing-Luftbildern noch einigermassen gut erkennbar. Zudem ist es das logische Bindeglied zwischen den beiden ungenutzten Gleisresten, mit welchen es an seinen Enden verbunden ist.

Liebe Grüsse
MappSurfer
セコイア (2025-02-27 07:09:18+00:00): What does (Hakone) mean?
citrula (2025-02-26 23:39:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. Luckily for us, Esri imagery is updated enough in this location to trace the buildings accurately. I went ahead and did this, as well as a few other edits, which you can review here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162992129
Happy mapping!
PèreForez (2026-01-27 21:36:11+00:00): Bonjour, Merci de faire les corrections de historic=monument en =memorial (je suis aussi concerné mais plus particulièrement par les monuments aux morts ou plaques et stèles des morts par fait de guerre, référencés progressivement en ref:FR:MemorialllGenWeb) . et c'est à ce propos que suite aux discussions avec les resposnables OSM-France il s'avère que le tag memorial=suivi de plusieurs variables (statue, stèle ...) est apparemment mal accepté dans la cartographie OSM. !! En conséquence, maintenant il conviendrait pour les monuments liés aux guerres, et en dehors des cas où le tag memorial=war-memorial, d'abord de n'utiliser qu'une seule variable (stele, statue, buste...) et de la compéter par l'attribut war_memorial=yes.
 Cela revient  à dire qu'un monument simple peut avoir le tag memorial=statue OU =stele OU =bust, mais que les monuments composites avec plusieurs "gros" éléments dans leur architecture ne peuvent pas être caractérisés par le tag memorial en dehors de memorial=war_memorial
    Je corrige directement sur tout le territoire français tous les cas de données où, en même temps qu'il y a la référence MemorialGenWeb, le tag memorial comporte plusieurs variables séparées par le point-virgule
    J'espère ne pas avoir été trop cafouilleux dans mon explication !!
Bonne continuation
silversurfer83 (2025-02-27 07:36:50+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :) 

Danke, dass du dabei hilfst, Biedenkopf auf dem neuesten Stand zu halten. Ich bin auch ein einfacher Mitwirkender und beobachte nebenbei, was sich in einem gewissen Gebiet um mich herum so an der Karte tut. Du hast hier darum gebeten, dass sich jemand deine Änderung ansieht. Kann dauern, bis das jemand tut, heute ging es schnell ;)

Also:
Wenn Objekte wie diese beiden POI (Point Of Interest) in der eingetragenen Form nicht mehr in der Realität vorhanden sind ist es prinzipiell schon in Ordnung sie zu löschen.

In den meisten Fällen enthalten die OSM-Objekte jedoch Informationen, die weiterhin nützlich sind, weshalb sie eben nicht immer gleich komplett gelöscht werden sollten.

Daher meine Frage: Gibt es an der Stelle noch leerstehende Geschäftsräume? Weist noch etwas darauf hin, dass hier Geschäfte waren? Wenn ja, wie sieht das aus?

Noch ein paar Allgemeine Dinge:
Da OSM mittlerweile schon ein paar Jahre exisitert und nun täglich millionen Menschen mit unseren Daten arbeiten haben sich ein paar Regeln entwickelt die in unserem Wiki unter wiki.osm.org dokumentiert und diskutiert werden. 
Vielleicht guckst du dir mal die Einsteigerseiten unter
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
und
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide
an.

Bei Fragen steht dir neben mir auch eine ganze Menge Menschen auf verschiedenen Plattformen zur Seite. Du kannst unter c.osm.org im Forum gucken oder du schaust in einer der vielen Chatgruppen vorbei:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

happy mapping
silversurfer83
Kalligraph (2025-02-27 10:37:18+00:00): Hallo! Nein, das ist heute ein ganz normales Wohnhaus. Die ehemaligen Geschäftsräume sind in keiner Weise mehr öffentlich zugänglich. Da würde man nur noch die Miter belästigen, wenn da Touristen nach dem Laden suchen würden, besonders, da es der einzige Lebensmittelladen außerhalb des Einkaufszentrums war.
silversurfer83 (2025-02-27 10:55:25+00:00): Danke für deine schnelle Rückmeldung.

In diesem Fall hast du alles richtig gemacht. Wenn da nichts (!) mehr ist kann es weg.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-27 06:39:55+00:00): if path exists there it must not be deleted

if it is illegal to use by general public it can be marked as access=private (that typical person is not allowed to use it)
felipeeugenio (2025-02-26 20:34:46+00:00): Estimado. Somos tres maperos a estas alturas revisando sus ediciones. Le peidmos por favor identificarse y tomar contacto con quienes le están comentando los cambios. Sus ediciones han consumido el tiempo de mucha gente en los intentos por corregirlas. Por favor mostrar un poco de respeto.
Saludos
geomaniX (2025-02-26 21:01:59+00:00): Versehentlich gelöscht, anstatt mit lifecycle Tags versehen. :-/
You3njoyMys3lf (2025-03-27 13:31:11+00:00): Hey Alyssa, I biked these trails a couple weeks ago after someone put them up on Wandrer. I'm not sure if it's private property or not, did you see any signs?
Alyssa Chance (2025-03-27 13:38:39+00:00): Yup there are a few private property signs.  One near the ball field below Olympia and another on Pennridge just past the playground entrance. The trails seem to be for the residents there. That being said if you went there if does not mean you would be hassled but they are not city or public property like the rest of the Emerald View system
You3njoyMys3lf (2025-03-27 13:47:19+00:00): Oh that makes sense! I didn't see them lol, at least one of us caught it
Alyssa Chance (2025-03-27 13:52:07+00:00): I also replied to your post on Strava. Happy Wandrering!
NeisBot (2025-02-26 20:56:38+00:00): Hi Tater Salad 1570, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 97% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=162988131
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-28 14:58:58+00:00): Thank you for your kind message and confirming that your deletions were intentional.

#HappyMapping
yelisey90 (2025-02-27 07:50:01+00:00): reverted: no such name exists in official or common usage