piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2023-03-02 13:52:47+00:00): Hoi Erik... Lastig te beoordelen voor een buitenstaander.
Je zou de voorgaande mapper kunnen vragen waarom hij daar paden heeft ingetekend. Zijn die echt allemaal verdwenen?
Wel mist er nu een aansluiting van een stuk track met een andere track. 
Kijk even goed hier dan zie je dat je iets te veek hebt verwijderd.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133211851
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-03-02 13:54:08+00:00): Het pad heb ik weer laten aansluiten. op het nw - zo pad.
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-25 16:18:50+00:00): There is no road seen in this changeset. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133211862
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-25 16:04:36+00:00): It's looks like an old pond rather than a building. Need to change the tag. #OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133211885
eggie (2023-03-02 13:55:45+00:00): Wat leesvoer... mocht je meer info hebben 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
mcliquid (2023-03-03 08:03:18+00:00): Hi, du hast hier einen Punkt als "leisure=park" innerhalb von einem Gebäude eingetragen. Ein Park ist eine Grünfläche zur Erholung mit Bäumen etc. 
Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dpark

Bist du dir sicher, dass es hier in der Seilbahnstation einen Park gibt? Gibt es davon Bilder? Architektonisch sicher spannend :)
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-25 16:23:16+00:00): No buildings here. #OMGuru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133212010
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-02 13:30:16+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150706114

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-25 15:45:09+00:00): Two separate buildings are tagged together. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133212085
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-25 15:22:45+00:00): No Street level imagery. But the map is good. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133212108
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-25 15:56:22+00:00): No building exists here. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133212134
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-05-25 16:11:51+00:00): Do not have street imagery. But looks fine. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133212228
Pisto81 (2024-06-27 16:02:32+00:00): Doesn't seem from the imagery that there is a road there. #OMGuru #OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133212253
literan (2023-03-05 21:02:28+00:00): и здесь испортили пешеходные переходы (убрали тег перехода и вместо него добавили тег светофора - а ведь светофор стоит не на само зебре, а заранее). Не надо так делать.

Посмотрите здесь картинку, какие теги нужны:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:crossing
Shaun das Schaf (2023-03-02 21:38:26+00:00): Hallo mis16bi,

wenn es nur eine normale Garage ist, können alle anderen Tags ausser "building=garage" weg.

Ich habe es noch korrigiert.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133228889

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Allroads (2023-03-06 13:50:31+00:00): Helaas, heb je geen gevolg gegeven aan eerdere melding.

Het intekenen van stoepen is correct gedaan.

Het verwijderen van de stoepen niet, is data verwijderen, en mag niet.

Ik ben er nog niet aan toe gekomen om eerder verwijdering te herstellen.
Dat moet nog gebeuren.

Ik vraag jouw te stoppen met deze verwijderingen. Welke correct zijn in Openstreetmap.

Als het zo door gaat zal ik beroep op de DWG moeten doen. (Data working group, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group)

Met vriendelijke groet Allroads.
multimodaal (2023-03-09 19:59:46+00:00): Eens met Allroads, het is niet de bedoeling om eerdere correcte bijdragen van andere mappers te verwijderen en te vervangen door een minder informatierijk element (hier een tag op een ander element in plaats van een eigen geometrie). 

En ook het doorgaan met zulke edits in plaats van te reageren op een eerdere changesetcomment is niet de bedoeling:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132970794

@Seat Ibiza: wil je deze verwijderingen ajb terugdraaien? Dank alvast!
bxl-forever (2023-04-02 12:44:27+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nohousenumber is the recommended value.

"addr:housenumber"="z/n" triggered a validation problem here.
Dylan Van Assche (2023-04-02 13:01:12+00:00): How did you validate this? I never got an error in the editor about this. Just curious to improve for the future :)
bxl-forever (2023-04-02 13:50:45+00:00): The editor you are referring to is the iD editor, i.e. a simple javascript editor running inside your browser.  It only has basic features and probably ignores that such tags are incorrect.

I found this mistake when running the Nominatim Q/A validator; Nominatim is the software behind the small Search box in the upper-left corner of the map.
(I was looking for something else but felt you might be interested to learn one more thing here.)
There are plenty of validator tools that check OSM data, such as Osmose or OSM Inspector, but it requires some experience to understand them because most tools have false positives.

Apart from that, your contributions are great.  Have a nice day.
Dylan Van Assche (2023-04-02 13:55:30+00:00): Oh good to know! I always wondered how these things get validated anyway :) Thanks for the pointers!

I recently installed JOSM to fix the round abouts around the church in Vilvoorde as well because after the roadworks, they are gone.
bxl-forever (2023-03-02 14:57:44+00:00): Tip of the day:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
"If a café closes down, don't delete the node. Just remove the cafe related tags and leave other tags (like the address) in place"
Dylan Van Assche (2023-03-02 16:08:41+00:00): Ah thanks for the tip! Will take it into account :)
literan (2023-03-05 21:00:13+00:00): не надо удалять контуры бывших зданий с тегами was:building=yes

их сохраняют, чтобы не пришел новичок и не нарисовал заново здания (т.к. на снимках пока не видно, что они снесены)
igorevich (2023-03-06 08:45:05+00:00): понял, спасибо!
Tilia_J (2023-03-02 18:50:09+00:00): Ik heb de landuse=grass gewijzigd naar surface=grass.

Immers is de primaire eigenschap een archeologische site en daar hoort surface bij.

Het toevoegen van landuse is tagging voor de renderer waardoor de eigenschap Hunneschans niet meer gerenderd wordt en de naam Hunneschans wordt weergegeven als gras.
Глеб (2023-03-28 07:20:38+00:00): вы дорогу в Кабачигурте сломали. зачем?
goaned (2023-06-09 22:36:12+00:00): Hallo, ich glaube nicht, dass du lit=yes auf Weg 390666692 (Teil einer Verwaltungsgrenze) hinzufügen wolltest. Ich werde das im Zuge eines Changesets in Kürze wieder entfernen. Einen ähnlichen Fehler werde ich auch bei CS 134056614 anmerken.
literan (2023-03-05 20:56:45+00:00): светофоры верну на место. То как сделали вы - упрощенная схема
eggie (2023-03-02 15:39:53+00:00): Dag Erik,
ford=stream heb ik aangepast naar ford=yes op het pad zelf.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133213530

MVG
eggie

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ford%3Dyes
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:00:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:01:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
literan (2023-03-05 20:57:52+00:00): здесь теги пешеходного перехода зачем-то испортили
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-04-06 11:00:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134571999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed mechanica edits, including those referred to at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7024 and some others.  See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/currently-ongoing-automated-edit-for-service-vehicle/97737 .
iandees (2023-03-02 15:26:48+00:00): Once again, please don't delete driveways while you're mapping. They're useful and should remain in OpenStreetMap.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133213691
ivanbranco (2023-03-02 16:02:08+00:00): Ciao Matteo,

un altro utente ha commentato un tuo changeset, lo hai letto? Ti incollo una query overpass in cui puoi vedere quanti ne rimangono da correggere: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1rYP

Ho visto che stai aggiungendo nuove sedi anche laddove non ci sono i civici mappati, quindi non puoi averli aggiunti solo in base a Bing (l'unico riferimento presente nei tuoi changeset), se puoi aggiungi la fonte dei tuoi dati così anche gli altri utenti sanno da dove provengono.

Buon mapping
CMatteo (2023-03-02 16:09:37+00:00): Ciao, 
lavoro in collaborazione del Club Alpino Italiano sede Centrale, che mi ha fornito l'elenco delle sedi con i relativi civici. Io incrocio i dati ricevuti con google maps e street view e localizzo le sedi.
ivanbranco (2023-03-02 16:28:30+00:00): Ho capito.

Purtroppo le informazioni di Google Maps e Street View non possono essere utilizzate per mappare su OSM (CAI lavora su OSM da anni quindi lo sa bene). Quindi per favore non procedere piu' con queste modalità.

"The Google Maps Terms of Use explicitly forbid using Google Maps content - both map data and Google Street View - for making any other content. It includes using them for OSM mapping." (vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google )

Quindi è probabile che almeno le seguenti sedi (quelle create da te) debbano essere cancellate dal database: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1rZ2
CMatteo (2023-03-02 18:12:29+00:00): Capisco, molti punti sono stati aggiornati. La fonte è un database con le coordinate GPS e i vari tag da inserire. Non capisco il problema se verifico i punti con fonti esterne al db per non incorrere in errori di localizzazione o assenza di dati (mancanza di edificio o altro).
Essendo novizio mi capita di fare errori. Grazie per la segnalazione.
Andrea Musuruane (2023-03-03 08:11:09+00:00): Ciao. Le condizioni d'uso di Google Maps vietano esplicitamente di utilizzare i contenuti di Google Maps - sia i dati delle mappe che Google Street View - per la creazione di qualsiasi altro contenuto. Questo ovviamente include anche il loro utilizzo per inserire dati su OSM. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133213788
gianlucabus (2023-03-02 14:27:03+00:00): I have wrongly named this road and I can't find a way to revert the changeset. Ideally this change request should be rejected and discarded.
BCNorwich (2023-03-02 15:56:39+00:00): Hi, I've reverted this changeset for you. Need any help please just ask. Oh and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Regards Bernard.
ivanbranco (2023-03-06 17:25:36+00:00): Ciao LukeDH,

mi sembra corretto avvisarti che questo changeset è stato parzialmente revertato da questo changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133307232
LukeDH (2023-03-06 17:59:30+00:00): Ciao Ivan,
grazie per la segnalazione. Posso sbagliare anche io, però in questo caso mi pare un grave errore l'eliminazione delle mie correzioni. Non mi pare proprio che abbia senso creare due punti per la stessa località abitata: di Garbagnate Milanese ne esiste solo uno, ed è capoluogo comunale e non un sobborgo. Di "insolito" ho solo sistemato le popolazioni esistenti approssimandole in mancanza di dati certi
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-03-02 19:41:43+00:00): For some of the gardens you've added there is also a good tag
landuse=allotments found under garden allotments. Doesn't necessary make your leisure=garden invalid.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dallotments
mavl (2023-04-23 16:08:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:11:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-02 14:50:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10704461833

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Thorum (2023-03-02 14:45:06+00:00): photos : https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/st-joost-st-josse-1210.1276713/page-14#post-182697516
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-02 14:50:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10704482043
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360081481
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360081470

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
jpennycook (2023-03-04 18:58:06+00:00): Hi!

1. Could I ask you to provide proper changeset comments?  "Accuracy updates" doesn't really tell anyone anything.  Ideally, some combination of why you made the edits, what you changed, and what your source was (e.g. survey, aerial imagery, etc.).  When you save your changeset, you can also select "Sources" in the "Add fields" box, which will allow you to record your sources.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Why_should_I_use_Changeset_Comments?
2. In this changeset, at the roundabout next to Boulton Drive, the node for Boulton Drive entrance/exit was merged with the Rose Kiln Lane exit.  Different exits/entrances should have separate nodes, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Connecting_ways ("Do not directly connect approaching with departing roads").  I've split the nodes now.
3. If you're interested in improving the alignment of roads etc., you should look at using the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer https://osmuk.org/cadastral-parcels/ as this provides lines that are perfectly aligned, making it easier to align the aerial imagery (I tend to use walls/fences in housing estates for the alignment).

Jon
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-26 16:06:41+00:00): pamiętaj że jest tam "zazwyczaj" 


są drogi wojewódzkie które są podjazdami lub drogami leśnymi
Lejun (2023-09-23 04:44:13+00:00): T'as ajouté des passages à niveau qui soulèvent des questions, tu peux nous en dire plus ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3896421
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-02 15:00:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9179655568
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9179655567

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Waaslander (2023-03-02 14:59:41+00:00): *Zonder Kardinaal Jozef
CatSu (2023-03-03 00:47:24+00:00): Lol, added tree!
Devdatta (2023-03-20 06:56:44+00:00): Why have you marked this road as under construction? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106130080

Please make smaller changesets, so that it is easier to undo them, and flag them.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-03 12:08:37+00:00): Hi,

This changeset introduced https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10704538351 which is a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10681995817, can you please fix this?
eggie (2023-03-02 15:25:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback...  In OSM taggen we bij op de bestaande adresnodes. Dus geen adres aanmaken.
De info voeg ik wel even samen.



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
dinandmentink (2023-03-02 15:29:41+00:00): Dank je. Ik zal er op letten en de gestuurde info doornemen voor ik een volgende toevoeging doe.

Wat overigens sporadisch zal zijn verwacht ik.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:09:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:54:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
habi (2025-03-04 12:07:57+00:00): Tschou zäme

Ist schon eine Weile her, aber wenn ihr das Büro virtuell in OpenStreetMap zügelt, dann sollten nicht nur die Addressdaten angepasst werden, sonder auch die Koordinaten.
Der Punkt ist immer nocht in Ittigen, laut Daten aber in  den Vidmarhallen.

Gruss,
habi

PS1: Lustigerweise wohne ich ganz in der Nähe der Vidmarhallen
PS2: Ich bin auf der Suche nach 'falschen' Addressen in OpenStreetMap mit https://nominatim.org/qa/#map=13.42/46.98/7.48&layer=addr_street_wrong_name, deshalb tauchte das hier auf...
habi (2025-03-04 12:12:03+00:00): Ähm, was ich nicht ganz verstehe, laut Webseite ist 'nur' das Kreativbüro in den Vidmarhallen, die Administration ist weiterhin in Ittigen.
Soll das also mit zwei Standpunkten abgebildet werden, oder sollen eure Kund:innen euch wo finden?
laurent-38 (2023-03-05 10:00:21+00:00): Bonjour Pravaz 2GT4,

Merci pour cette contribution, mais il y a beaucoup à dire.

- sur la « Route arret de bus-ecole » (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1150731267) : il ne faut pas utiliser un objet de type route  pour modéliser un itinéraire : d'une part, cela crée des doublons avec les rues existantes, et d'autre part, il existe des objets spécialisés pour cela : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Relation:route . Mais c'est complexe à mettre en œuvre, et surtout on ne doit mettre dans OpenStreetMap que des choses vérifiables. Si cet itinéraire n'est pas balisé, il n'a sans doute pas sa place dans OSM.

- sur l'arrêt de bus https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10704566149 : ne pas mettre « Arrêt de bus » comme nom, on le sait que c'est un arrêt de bus car il a comme attribut highway=bus_stop. N'a-t-il pas de nom spécifique genre « Marrin » ou « Route du Stade »? Si pas de nom, mettre noname=yes.

- Caserne des pompiers de Chimilin (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10704566150) : elle est en doublon de la caserne déjà modélisée  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218197811 . 

Si vous le souhaitez, je peux faire les corrections nécessaires.

Cordialement
~~
Laurent
mavl (2023-04-23 16:03:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
jurgen (2024-02-09 22:28:17+00:00): making this a busbaan made it dissapear on every cycle map
A67-A67 (2024-02-11 13:42:32+00:00): The tag highway=busway has been the correct way to map a busway for 3 years now. Some outdated map renderers indeed don't show them, but that is an issue that should be solved at the renderers, not at the map database.
mavl (2023-04-23 16:00:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 16:05:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
Uterouter (2023-03-03 12:00:06+00:00): Привет. Прекратите добавлять отсутствующие объекты на карту. В этом нет никакого смысла.
Roman-dev (2023-03-03 13:56:08+00:00): Привет, извините
Константин Гам (2023-03-14 10:54:17+00:00): А обьект так и остался...
Uterouter (2023-03-14 11:26:02+00:00): Я уже удалял их однажды. В этот раз отвлекся и забыл )
Uterouter (2023-03-14 11:45:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10044930117/history
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-10 04:47:23+00:00): Hej, lepiej dodać link bezpośredni - a nie taki co ukrywa dokąd on prowadzi
mavl (2023-04-23 16:07:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:53:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].