piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
andershl (2025-09-29 09:44:49+00:00): The coastline was possibly broken because the whole charade was marked as one: Citronen Fjord. The name is Alexander E. Hyde Fjord. The side arms have separate names and I have dropped them there as points. After my bad experiences with separating out Citronen I shall make no further attempts here. But someone should finsih it by doing everything right.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2025-09-29 09:51:14+00:00): Hi andershl, plase, proceed with the edits, if something is broken, I will jump in and fix it. Your edit was of a great value; it needed just a small adjustment so no need to stop editing because of this. Keep going and happy mapping !!!
andershl (2025-09-29 15:00:52+00:00): Oh, I shall keep editing, but mainly by importing/supplementing official coordinates and place names. Revceived from the authorities. Have some thousands in the pipeline. Can outline rivers and lakes, but no multi polygons.
solenoid jam (2025-11-11 05:03:31+00:00): Ещё не закончили благоустройство? Два месяца уже прошло
neo-plan (2025-11-11 20:04:33+00:00): Я больше не был там. Не знаю. Но в Москве обычно быстро такие работы не делаются.
solenoid jam (2025-11-11 22:18:18+00:00): Думаю что кратковременные объекты вроде реконструкций стоит добавлять только если мы готовы своевременно актуализировать данные. А то дорожку могли уже месяц назад пересыпать, а на карте она будет висеть по меньшей мере до следующего лета. Мы не 2гис, у которых цикл полной выверки Москвы составляет три месяца.  Я только что обработал дома, сданные в 2024. Про завершение крупной стройки не знали больше года, а тут дорожка.
neo-plan (2025-11-12 01:49:04+00:00): Хорошо, удалю.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-10-01 21:02:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 172724890 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious changes; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18770
user_18023081 (2025-09-25 03:37:52+00:00): Too bad for you Apple Maps and its imagery aren't licensed for use in OSM :3
cswilson252 (2025-09-25 03:51:01+00:00): I reverted these changes because Apple Maps data unfortunately can't be used on OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data? . Thank you very much for taking the time to edit OSM nonetheless!!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172419660
ManuelB701 (2025-09-28 15:39:39+00:00): Mit dieser Änderung bin ich nicht ganz einverstanden, weil das Zeichnen für Fußwegen extra für Straßenkreuzungen m.M.n. kaum Mehrwert dient (gerade bei den ganzen Ecken und Kanten wird das Routing ganz stark verzerrt) und weil hier die Straßen durch sidewalk=separate unnötig aufgeteilt werden, zudem man den separaten Bürgersteig auch mit dem des nördlichen Kreisels verbinden könnte.

Aber ich beschwere hier vor allem, weil du bei der Aufteilung den ganzen Busrouten Lücken hinzugefügt und diese dadurch kaputt gemacht hast.
tenzul (2025-09-29 16:08:03+00:00): Hallo Manuel,

Danke für dein Feedback. Die Busrouten hätte ich besser nachprüfen sollen. Normalerweise ist die JOSM Split-Funktion ja zuverlässig, was ich jetzt bemerkt habe ist, dass bei Kreiseln alle Segmente beibehalten werden. Leider gibt es auch später keine Warnung dazu. Ich werde das in Zukunft beachten. Die Relationen sind mittlerweile repariert.

Ich habe mir die Zeit genommen deine Stellungsnahme zu den separaten Gehsteigen durchzulesen. Größtenteils bin ich der selben Meinung, dass dadurch zu viel Komplexität entsteht. Wie du siehst hatte ich  am Kreisel weiter südlich nur sidwalk-Tags verwendet. Bei dieser Änderung ging es mir vor allem um die Fußüberwege und den Pfad vom Parkplatz auf den Gehsteig. Ich wüsste nicht, wie dieser ansonsten kartierbar wäre.

Was ich nicht nachvollziehen konnte sind deine Bedenken zum Routing. Ich würde sogar sagen, dass die neuen Strecken eher den tatsächlichen Laufdistanzen ähneln. Falls du hierzu konkrete Beispiele hast kann ich gerne Verbesserungen vornehmen.
StC (2025-10-31 17:54:14+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a supprimé un membre de la super-relation https://openstreetmap.org/relation/1824726, sans doute par erreur. Je m’occupe de la réparation.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-12 06:18:12+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13168320359/history has id = 1 that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
leticiagandrade (2025-11-14 12:13:27+00:00): Olá!
Essa tag não é necessária. Ocorre que ao importar a camada de dados através do software Qgis essa tag foi adicionada automaticamente. Dessa formar os dados ainda não haviam sido validados.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-09-25 06:16:00+00:00): Moin Lord_Alpha,
dürfen wir die SinON Daten für OSM nutzen?
Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
NeisBot (2025-09-24 21:06:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-29 11:33:24+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/172608235
user_5359 (2025-09-26 06:02:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is this really a building or just a property with several smaller buildings?
Legend 🌟 (2025-09-28 23:16:38+00:00): Its a property with several smaller buildigs
gormo (2025-09-24 21:36:53+00:00): Die Einrichtung ist erst geplant; siehe https://www.haz.de/lokales/hannover/verwaltungsgericht-stadt-hannover-darf-obdachlosenunterkunft-im-zooviertel-bauen-2V4N4XLCO5FATNB2IQVCJUBWII.html . Habe entsprechend umgetaggt.
Nakaner (2025-11-06 18:02:30+00:00): Hi,

when did you survey the section between Dettenheim and Karlsruhe? Did you see any signs that form a followable route?

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner-repair (2025-11-30 21:24:56+00:00): This changes was reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175331960

You did not respond to my question and therefore, I had to assume that you used copyrighted material as source and did not do any on the ground surveys.
Nakaner (2025-11-30 21:34:27+00:00): Hi,

in OpenStreetMap, we model long hiking and cycling routes as superroutes because maintaining huge route relations becomes a mess. These superroutes contain only nodes (signposts) and relations (regional sections of the superroute). This is established mapping practice. I would like to ask you to follow that and get familiar with relation editing before attempting to remodel large things. I strongly recommend to switch to JOSM before you continue editing large relations. You won't become happy and your fellow mappers won't become happy either because iD's has limited support for editing relations.

In regions, where the local network is organised or modelled as a node network and the signed long-distance routes use the edges of the node network as members of the superroutes. In Baden-Württemberg, the cycling network is currently remodelled as node network in OSM. In large parts of Baden, the work has already been finished.

Therefore, I decided to revert your changes.

Best regards

Michael
DLRLA2025BI (2025-12-05 15:19:08+00:00): Hi, 
I'm sorry for the late reply - I was very busy the last two weeks and couldn't follow up during that time. 

Regarding your question: between Dettenheim and Karlsruhe there are currently no signs forming a followable route. Only some leftovers of the outdated Veloroute Rhein signage remain which don't meet the current FGSV standards.
I mistakenly thought unsigned sections could be mapped since the section between Dettenheim and Rheinhausen was already in OSM, but now I understand that route sections should only be added when corresponding signage exists. 
For consistency, I would support  removing the Dettenheim - Rheinhausen section as well.

I did ground surveys in November and the beginning of December this year and can confirm that the EuroVelo 15 Rheinhausen - Karlsruhe stretch is not signed yet. Until signage is eventually in place, I'll hold off any further changes to this section.

Being still fairly new to OpenStreetMap, I overshot when trying to remodel the Basel - Karlsruhe stage of EuroVelo 15. Thank you for pointing me to the established practice with superroutes and node networks. I'll take time to get familiar with relation editing and switch to JOSM for large relation edits once I've gained more experience.

I was confused because most EuroVelo stages are mapped as continuous relations and show up clearly on CyclOSM and Cycle Map. The Basel - Karlsruhe stage felt like an outlier, and I thought aligning it with the other stages would improve consistency for map users. I now understand that the cycling network in Baden-Württemberg uses now a node-based mapping approach, which would explain the difference.

I also made some local edits in Karlsruhe-Daxlanden, around the Waidweg tram stop area, based on recent ground surveys. The Waidweg tram stop was rebuilt and a few changes to the paths around it occurred which I wanted to reflect.

Apologies for any inconvenience my earlier changes caused, and thank you for your guidance.

Best regards,
DLRLA2025BI
DLRLA2025BI (2025-12-05 15:36:58+00:00): I also realized your original question was asked earlier than the two-week period I mentioned. At that time I hadn't looked at notifications at all - newbie mistake on my part. Sorry for missing it, I'll make sure to keep an eye on them in the future.
DLRLA2025BI (2025-12-07 19:40:03+00:00): Apologies for an incorrect statement I made 2 days ago.

The signage (even if outdated and inconsistent) is present between Rheinhausen and Rußheim.

That was an oversight on my side when I was writing my response.

As of November 19, 2025, when I last did a ground survey there on bicycle, I found though that a few subtle changes did occur northeast of Philippsburg: the old Veloroute Rhein plates were recently removed from the signage where the route overlaps with both the Seen-Tour and the Vogelpark / Tierpark Tour.

It is possible that, given the local Seen-Tour and the Vogelpark / Tierpark Tour cycle routes are currently being signed, the Rheinhausen - Karlsruhe stretch could soon also receive modern signage aligned with the FGSV standards, and with EuroVelo plates. 

I hope this information would be helpful.

Best regards,
DLRLA2025BI
NorthCrab_upload (2025-09-24 22:10:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9536824161
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/214358561

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2026-01-14 12:48:13+00:00): Beste Volgens mij was hier zoveel schade dat het allemaal weer is hersteld.
Svp geen wegen splitsen met edits iD.
Er lopen talloze routerelaties en die gaan dan vervolgens allemaal stuk.
Je actie is nergens voor nodig.


MVG
eggie
xkillah (2026-04-01 12:09:41+00:00): Почему вдруг жилые улицы стали service alley ?
yelisey90 (2026-04-01 12:27:05+00:00): Попробовал применить, чего в вики написано для service=alley:

In some regions, chiefly in Europe, narrow streets in historic cities that provide access to the main entrances of buildings may also be mapped as alleys, distinguishing them from wider modern streets mapped, for example, as highway=residential. In some areas, this case is much more common than the rear access case. 

Ибо классических alley с задней стороны домов в Грузии нет (ну м. б. кроме разве что в каких-то новостроенных коттеджных посёлках). Для старой хаотичной застройки с узкими улочками, где не хватит места для разъезда двух машин или для объезда припаркованной машины, имхо, описание alley как выше вполне применимо, ибо имеем вполне себе historic city.
Firefishy (2025-09-25 10:46:22+00:00): Awesome mapping. Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for all the local knowledge additions!
0235 (2025-09-24 23:22:26+00:00): Y tho?
user_18023081 (2025-09-25 12:30:52+00:00): Y not.
mavl (2025-09-25 14:29:01+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок оставил один угол здания непрямоугольным.  
  
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=172415755  
  
Это не одно, а три здания (на более старом снимке Mapbox видно, что два здания есть, а третьего ещё нет). У южного здания, похоже, просто крыша имеет непрямоугольную форму.
geo_ozon (2025-09-27 20:49:12+00:00): Согласна с замечанием, спасибо за исправление.
Glassman (2025-09-25 22:46:52+00:00): Typically FLOC cameras are not on sidewalks. It best to create a single node by looking for the poles shadow.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172416001
Glassman (2025-09-25 22:49:38+00:00): #TIP: terraced units are connected to each other. In these none are connected and one even overlaps. Cann you fix them? Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172416025
Tatfahren (2026-02-14 21:33:47+00:00): In https://osmcha.org/changesets/177820484 wurden die Rohrleitungen die du hier hinzugefügt hast (bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1432659528) gelöscht. Liege ich richtig das du anhand einer Baugrube eingetragen hast, und die wiederhergestellt werden müssten?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172416052
Tatrafan_2050 (2026-02-15 09:03:35+00:00): Hi, ja in der Tat habe ich die Rohrleitungen kartiert, als ich an der damals noch offenen Baugrube vorbei gekommen bin. Allerdings habe ich keine Ahnung, wohin die sich ans weitere Netz anschließen, aber wenn ich raten müsste dann würde ich auf Fernwärme tippen.
ilias_ (2025-09-25 09:19:54+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM!

Was only that small segment renamed to Avenue Inaouin or all of the road? e.g.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772084152

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165725023
Abdelmalekkkkk (2025-09-25 11:54:27+00:00): Thanks Ilias! Great observation, it's the entire road actually. I will change the other two segments.
ilias_ (2025-09-25 11:57:22+00:00): Thanks Abdelmalek, your local knowledge and help are greatly appreciated.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-29 17:15:19+00:00): Why you think that indoor=yes should be removed here?
ti-lo (2025-09-30 17:14:40+00:00): As it's not an indoor element
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-03 03:08:08+00:00): do you mean that it is not indoors?
demon_box (2025-09-25 09:02:14+00:00): Ciao nournsm, ti segnalo che in Italia il civico identifica il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Infatti un edificio può avere più entrate e di conseguenza più numeri civici. 
Quindi hai 2 opzioni: 
1. Se conosci esattamente la posizione (entrata) del civico che stai mappando metti tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su un nodo del perimetro dell'edificio (aggiungendo anche il tag entrance sullo stesso nodo);
2. Se invece non hai questa informazione così precisa devi mettere tutti i tags dell'indirizzo su nodo adiacente ma STACCATO dal poligono dell'edificio.
Ho già proceduto con le correzioni del caso. 
Grazie e BuonMapping!
demon_box (2025-09-25 09:02:43+00:00): Hi nournsm, I would like to point out that in Italy the street number identifies the access point (entrance) and NOT the entire building. In fact, a building can have multiple entrances and consequently multiple street numbers. 
So you have 2 options: 
1. If you know exactly the position (entrance) of the street number you are mapping, put all the address tags on a node on the perimeter of the building (also adding the entrance tag on the same node); 
2. If you do not have this precise information, you must put all the address tags on an adjacent node but DETACHED from the polygon of the building. 
I have already made the necessary corrections. 
Thanks and Happy Mapping!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-19 08:06:41+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/614483582/history has shop = refillery that was added in this edit
shop=refillery ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
Pontius (2025-12-20 21:59:00+00:00): I'd guess it is an ecofriendly home goods shop. I'll update the tags.
Gustavo22Soares (2025-10-21 20:29:37+00:00): tenha mais cuidado com suas edições pfvr
citrula (2025-09-25 04:10:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. The ALPR node should be in the physical location, not in the middle of the road. You can right click the node and select the "extract" option to remove it from the road and move it.

Let me know if you need help doing this!
felipeeugenio (2025-09-25 11:49:26+00:00): Hola. El addr:milestone es solo agregando la cantidad de kilometros, con punto, no coma (sistema inglés)

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172417110
IshikawaJun (2025-09-29 01:48:03+00:00): 実在しない路線を営業線として書き加えるのはまずいです。岡山電気番町支線はすでに廃止されています。
IshikawaJun (2025-09-29 03:48:42+00:00): 城下スカイタワーですがこれ合ってますかね。旧市民会館跡地の市有地は岡山市が公表した計画図を見ると公園エリアになってこのような商業施設は建たない事になってますが。
Saroj kdl (2025-09-25 01:23:35+00:00): Nominatim
Mahakali Highway, Chure-03, Nigali, Chure, Kailali, Sudurpashchim Province, Nepal
ellieayla_ (2025-09-25 01:56:14+00:00): The circular surface area isn't rendering quite the way I expected on the osm.org slippy map; it's probably not tagged correctly.
ellieayla_ (2025-09-25 02:01:29+00:00): It renders closer to the way I expected in the mobile app "Go Map!!", though as a circular path instead of an area. Maybe that's more correct though?
ellieayla_ (2025-09-25 02:08:02+00:00): This is an attempt to solve note 4873095
Frans S (2025-09-27 14:15:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key while selected.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-09-26 10:10:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. When you see an object which shows not a shadow, it is probably not a building. (buildings should show a shadow, proving it is above ground-level)
I removed a few.
Buildings can have a gray/brownish roof. Map them as well.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-09-28 10:26:19+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Pleases map the gray round buildings as well next time.
See the picture in the comment section of the project about what to map.
Don't forget to square each rectangular building and do not connect nodes of buildings to each other.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-09-27 14:22:31+00:00): Thanks for mapping.
The gray objects , rectangular, which shows a shadow, are buildings as well. Please map them also.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2025-10-03 09:01:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A new mapper. Welcome.
Mappings are reviewed to check that they in line with the quality standards.
An issue here:
Each rectangular building need to be squared with the Q key while it is still selected. 
37 buildings out of 78 were not squared.
Best regards and keep mapping
foreigner037 (2025-09-25 07:02:28+00:00): Hi,

can you keep the changeset geographically smaller?

osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
ilias_ (2025-09-25 11:53:41+00:00): Also, the changeset comments shouldn't be your job description, but rather what you edited in your changeset, e.g. "added service roads".
SomeoneElse (2025-09-25 22:11:23+00:00): Hello crowntina and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

You've added a couple of odd things in your first and only changeset so far: http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=172418737 .

OpenStreetMap is for mapping things that actually exist; perhaps you could explain the significance of "no king in acd" and "no king in ca" here?
Best Regards,
Andy
MassCartog (2025-09-25 16:04:31+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Please stop removing these features from OSM. Private roads and non-accessible roads are valid to be included in OSM.

You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing them is actually considered vandalism.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
mueschel (2025-09-26 17:53:49+00:00): It seems something went wrong here. All the objects have many tags that shouldn't be in OSM, e.g.:

OBJECTID = 9578
id = 691067
lga_code = 302
lga_name = BALLARAT
ref = Central Highlands Water Open Data
type = Fire plug
TheSwavu (2025-09-27 00:27:56+00:00): Changesets have been reverted. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines before doing any more imports.

Data is licenced CC BY-SA 4.0 which cannot be made compatible with ODbL https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility.
Lostmonkey (2025-09-25 07:03:30+00:00): Måske en note om at tjekke tilbage. Ifølge denne er planen at det skal genåbne i 2026: https://www.tvmidtvest.dk/thisted/alt-skal-vaek-for-agger-badehotel-skal-totalrenoveres
MassCartog (2025-09-25 16:04:27+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Please stop removing these features from OSM. Private roads and non-accessible roads are valid to be included in OSM.

You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing them is actually considered vandalism.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
rskedgell (2026-06-29 16:04:19+00:00): Please could you explain to me, as someone who actually lives in London and uses OSM data for pedestrian navigation, how this benefits me?

Separate sidewalks which are not connected at crossings, particularly those with road markings which are clearly visible in the aerial imagery, create unnecessary and artificial detours.

Sidewalk stubs which are only connected to other highways at one end serve no purpose other than for decoration.
nevw (2025-09-26 11:38:24+00:00): Hi, you have duplicated Port Sorell Road here. You should instead add your alterations to the existing mapped street. If you are unable to fix this let me know and I'll revert the changes.
nevw (2025-10-02 04:41:33+00:00): no response, have reverted this changeset.
user_5359 (2025-09-25 07:20:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/6579387374 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. 
I moved the node back to the original position.
Alliegaytor (2025-09-25 09:38:14+00:00): You've edited Flagstaff station in Arizona, United States (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453586544/history/6#map=19/35.197405/-111.648589) in addition to the one you probably wanted to edit in Melbourne, Australia. I'd assume VIC DTP isn't intentionally editing in the US, so I've assumed this is a mistake and have reverted the changes in the US (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172430435).
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-05-24 23:01:10+00:00): Reverted due to SEO spam: Just a SEO spam name, description and nonsense tag

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183130085
mrpulley (2026-01-26 08:56:20+00:00): Just letting you know that I've deleted the incorrect name you added to the level crossing