piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
hauke-stieler (2026-07-26 10:54:35+00:00): Moin,

kurzer Hinweis bzgl. der Gleise: Bei Baumaßnahmen, Rückbauten oder Verfall von Infrastruktur (Straße, Gleise, Gebäude, etc.) lieber die lifecycle-Tags nutzen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix In diesem Fall wäre "disused:railway=rail" angebracht, um zu zeigen, dass das Gleis nicht mehr benutzt wird. Ich habe mich nämlich gewundert auf welche Brücke sich der Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5416636 bezieht, bis ich gesehen habe, dass du hier die Gleise gelöscht hast. Zudem kann es sein, dass jemand anhand der Luftbilder die Gleise wieder einzeichnet, weil diese dort noch zu sehen sind. Ich habe die beiden Gleise mal wiederhergestellt und entsprechend getaggt, schau gerne mal drauf: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46897227 Wenn die Gleise irgendwann komplett entfernt wurden, dann sag gerne Bescheid, dann passe ich die Daten nochmal an (oder du kannst sie auch selbst auf z.B. "removed:..." setzen).

Viele Grüße
Hauke
kadiwa (2026-07-27 10:44:28+00:00): @hauke-stieler Da sind keine Gleise mehr, siehe Video https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/hamburg/bahnbaustelle-in-hamburg-altona-bruecke-in-langenfelde-gesprengt,bahnstrecke-162.html
hauke-stieler (2026-07-27 15:01:15+00:00): @kadiwa Super, danke für den Hinweis. Habs als demolished umgeändert.
Fraxi (2026-07-25 18:56:18+00:00): Чакай и аз съм се заел :D
IvaKraljić (2026-07-25 18:59:53+00:00): The unnecessarily created node has since been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186363205. #OptimoRoute
ceirios (2026-07-25 20:27:11+00:00): Helo na

Dwi'n gweld bod ti wedi nodi "StreetView images" fel ffynhonell, ydy hynny'n cynnwys Google StreetView?

Diolch

Ceirios
Cymrodor (2026-07-26 18:38:17+00:00): Ie, mae enwau'r tai/ffermydd i'w gweld yn lluniau Google StreetView.
ljmnoonan (2026-07-25 19:37:08+00:00): This is a mobile flock LPR set up about 3 feet off the ground attached to a radar sign trailer. I assume that it has been put in place by ghpd to track visitors during the coast guard festival
gurglypipe (2026-07-26 08:32:07+00:00): Why is there an otherwise untagged UPRN node in the middle of the street? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14049711630

I don’t think it’s useful to add UPRNs to the map if we don’t know explicitly what they refer to in the UPRN DB. Doing so means we lose the list of known-UPRNs-which-are-not-yet-in-OSM. If people have a need to know the lat/lon of the full set of UPRNs they can always overlay the URPN DB on OSM for full coverage.
philipcullen (2026-07-26 12:29:49+00:00): Hello,

I believe that UPRN is the street record. My basis for this was that it links to the same USRN for that street, is centred to the road, there isn't another candidate to be a street record, and there wasn't anything nearby (street furniture, postboxes, etc) that could be another candidate.

I've found that the positing of street records varies by area (though is consistent within them). They always seem to be aligned at the centre point of the street, but can either be positioned exactly at junctions, offset from a junction to the be on just the street in question, or somewhere central on the street. 

I do agree that it only makes sense to add UPRNs to that confidently match things in OSM and that the list of "unmatched" is very valuable in itself.  My thinking on adding street records, in the absence of any open data on the UPRN type, is that this reduces the list of unknowns to ones that genuinely need investigating.
gurglypipe (2026-07-26 15:34:36+00:00): OK, that makes sense, but is not at all obvious from the changeset description or tagging.

Is there a way you could make the tagging clearer for these UPRNs on streets? Given that UPRN stands for ‘*property* reference number’ it’s a bit weird to see one on a street; especially since streets have USRNs.

Similarly, if you could add these UPRNs to streets in a separate changeset from all the rest of the UPRNs and geometry changes, with a changeset description which describes (or links to a wiki page describing) your methodology, that would go a long way to making the derivation of them transparent and verifiable, since from what you say it doesn’t sound straightforward.
philipcullen (2026-07-26 15:41:42+00:00): Will do. I'll try and make my chaneset descriptions more descriptive and split them out as you suggest.

I also find it strange that having created USRNs, UPRNs are assigned to represent the same object, though UPRNs seem to almost have become a general purpose way of specifying coordinates in some cases, with things like ponds often having them.
gurglypipe (2026-07-26 15:45:20+00:00): Thanks.

Yes, it does seem a bit odd that there’s a UPRN for the street, but having looked at the data here I do agree with you that it seems to relate to the street.
mewhenthe (2026-07-25 20:14:20+00:00): Changeset looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186365119
NieWnen (2026-07-26 12:33:26+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tych zmian?
Na orto widać wąski dojazd do drugiej działki z adresem 4
gurglypipe (2026-07-27 12:34:49+00:00): I removed the UPRN from the street here in changeset 186454199, as I don’t think it’s clear what that UPRN refers to when looking at the UPRN and USRN databases. If it refers to the street, why is it at one end rather than in the middle, and offset from the road centreline? As a UPRN why does it refer to a street at all? Could it be referring to a lamp post or street cabinet?
lakedistrict (2026-07-27 22:04:08+00:00): @gurglypipe The national standards for street naming and numbering authorities dictate two options for recording the co-ords of street record UPRNs: at the startpoint or at the midway point. (see https://guidance.geoplace.co.uk/dec-addresses/basic-land-and-property-unit-blpu/data-entry-conventions/street-blpus) 

Local (and indeed national) usage varies.
gurglypipe (2026-07-28 09:27:00+00:00): Ah, good to know that’s standardised, thanks for the references!
eggie (2026-07-25 20:32:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback  Tip  Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Dat geeft vaak schade door onbedoelde verplaatsingen van objecten.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
robertf (2026-07-25 20:06:16+00:00): (I didn't add the water fountain in SCEE, I moved it.)
Striddler (2026-07-25 20:03:15+00:00): Correction, changeset which originally introduced that error was 140014287.
rarad74 (2026-07-26 08:07:42+00:00): Salut.
Va reamintesc ca introduceti pe aceasta harta informatii care nu sunt suportate de catre openstreetmap. Nu exista valoarea Risc seimis de un anumit grad pentru tag-ul la care le adaugati. Aceste informatii in mod legitim pot fi oricand sterse.
Jantea Vlad (2026-07-26 08:24:16+00:00): Bună ziua, este pentru o temă dată la masterul managementul dezastrelor din cadrul Facultatii de geografie din Bucuresti.
Eu am urmat cerințele d-lui profesor.
Jantea Vlad (2026-07-26 08:26:11+00:00): De asemenea, am adaugat doar 2 taguri la fiecare cladire pe care am cartat-o, informatiile privind anul si clasa seismică fiind preluate din lista de clădiri publicate pe site-ul AMCCRS.
rarad74 (2026-07-26 08:32:13+00:00): Spune-i proesorului sa isi caute material didactic in alta parte. Harta asta nu este facuta ca sa faceti voi teste pe ea si sa o umpleti de informatii de tip junk. Am sa depun sesizare la DATA WORKING GROUP. sa stearga toate informatiile acestea, deoarece nu sunt suportate oficial si nu exista tag dedicat pentru cladiri cu risc seismic. Fe harta aceasta depind mii de utilizatori care o folosesc pentru scopul in care a fost creata.
StC (2026-07-26 07:07:03+00:00): Bonjour,

ce changeset a brisé la continuité d'un itinéraire pédestre qui passe par là. Je m'occupe de la réparation.
Romi Gerne (2026-07-30 23:38:50+00:00): Relation "Chemin de la Moselle"? Sorry, thanks!
Andrea Musuruane (2026-07-28 11:02:42+00:00): Ciao. L'etichettatura sul cancello è errata. locked=yes significa che il cancello è chiuso a chiave. opening_hours=24/7 significa che è sempre aperto. Le due cose sono in contraddizione tra di loro. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186366429
lapianta (2026-07-28 11:28:51+00:00): È sempre chiuso. Provvedo immediatamente a correggere. Grazie
Andrea Musuruane (2026-07-28 11:02:07+00:00): Ciao. L'etichettatura sul cancello è errata. locked=yes significa che il cancello è chiuso a chiave. opening_hours=24/7 significa che è sempre aperto. Le due cose sono in contraddizione tra di loro. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186366578
lapianta (2026-07-29 12:45:07+00:00): OK. Corretto. Grazie
KartKollektor (2026-07-25 21:07:13+00:00): Kartieren von POIs und Micromapping in Stetten Part 1

(Als Diskussions-Eintrag, da ich leider kein Kommentar zum Changeset hinzufügen konnte, wurde mit der EveryDoor-App erstellt)
pitfire (2026-07-26 04:01:20+00:00): Hallo Herr P,
höfliche Nachfrage. Gibt es einen zugelassenen Quellennachweis für diesen Adresseintrag ( Lennefer Mühle 24). Die Adressvergabe ist nicht nachvollziehbar bekannt oder belgt.
VG pitfire
pitfire (2026-07-28 18:38:12+00:00): Hallo Herr P,
falls Du die erste Nachricht übersehen haben solltest hier der aktuelle Eintrag in
https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/search.html?q=Lennefer+M%C3%BChle+24
Leider bisher keine Rückmeldung auf die gestellte Frage!
VG pitfire
Herr P (2026-07-29 11:11:20+00:00): Hallo zusammen, 
entschuldigt, dass ich erst jetzt antworte. Ich muss meinen Fehler eingestehen. Warum auch immer ich die 24 eingesetzt habe, weiß ich nicht. Die ist definitiv falsch. Das alte Mühlengebäude (jetzt Wohnhaus allein) hat nur eine Hausnummer . Die Nr. 1 . Bitte die 24 löschen. Vielen Dank und ich bitte um Entschuldigung für die unnötigen Mühen von Euch.
pitfire (2026-07-29 18:41:24+00:00): Danke für die offenen Diskussion. Angepasst: Änderungssatz #: 186602885
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-07-26 10:34:42+00:00): Les trottoirs pour tout le Québec doivent être codifiés avec bicycle dismount, sinon ça empêche des milliers d'accès aux commerces et résidences pour les vélos avec plusiuers calculateurs. Merci et bonne journée!

Voir https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-we-use-bicycle-dismount-on-all-sidewalks-in-quebec/133126/23
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-25 23:45:21+00:00): Hi O1S,

Thanks for applying the changes we [discussed on the OSM-US Slack](https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C2VJAJCS0/p1784950083368759). Per your request, I reviewed the changeset and did have to spot and fix some significant issues, which I did in changeset 186372980

https://osm.org/changeset/186372980

These include:

- The two large parking areas in the front of the school were entirely deleted seemingly unintentionally, despite parking aisles being added/tagged in these areas.
- Nearly all the existing ways were inexplicably deleted and recreated as well (see https://osm.wiki/Keep_the_history
- Most of the service ways were congealed into one mega-way, which looped back on itself multiple times--I didn't know iD would even let you create or upload that sort of malformed geometry; I guess I learned something too!
- Multiple points in the school's boundary way were dragged without apparent rationale

Due to the nature of the issues involved, I ended up having to just revert this changeset and re-apply the changes myself, as otherwise it would have been very tedious if not impossible to restore the history of all the ways involved one by one.

Therefore, in changeset 186372980 I restored the  mistakenly deleted existing parking ways and lots, re-applyed intended changes, added some additional tagging (surface=* and smoothness=* on the ways, various tags on the parking lots), and (per your other question on Slacked) moved the school POI tags to the amenity=* area where they belong.

https://osm.org/changeset/186372980

Thanks, and happy mapping!
noahheffron (2026-07-26 00:57:07+00:00): Please stop adding surveillance nodes that do not exist. Multiple users have asked you several times.
noahheffron (2026-07-26 00:57:11+00:00): Please stop adding surveillance nodes that do not exist. Multiple users have asked you several times.
noahheffron (2026-07-26 00:57:17+00:00): Please stop adding surveillance nodes that do not exist. Multiple users have asked you several times.
noahheffron (2026-07-26 00:57:23+00:00): Please stop adding surveillance nodes that do not exist. Multiple users have asked you several times.
noahheffron (2026-07-26 00:57:29+00:00): Please stop adding surveillance nodes that do not exist. Multiple users have asked you several times.
noahheffron (2026-07-26 00:57:34+00:00): Please stop adding surveillance nodes that do not exist. Multiple users have asked you several times.
silversurfer83 (2026-07-26 20:40:46+00:00): Schon wieder ich :)

bei charge=* wird idR auch eine Einheit erwartet. Bei Ladestationen erfassen wir aber keine Ladekosten, da sich diese bei fast allen Anbietern viel zu häufig ändern.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186369784
Analogknipser (2026-07-26 20:43:59+00:00): Danke für die info :D
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-25 21:55:46+00:00): Hello & welcome to OSM. We need to point out that, for the benefit of other users, you need to describe what you have actually done in any change, which "." as a Comment certainly don't do!
Please have a read of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments, and improve your comments in future.
Thanks
Graeme Fitzpatrick
Moderator
OSMF Data Working Group
noahheffron (2026-07-26 00:57:38+00:00): Please stop adding surveillance nodes that do not exist. Multiple users have asked you several times.
Piskvor (2026-07-27 09:34:45+00:00): Nb: tagging motorroad=no for explicit marking. No tag leads to incorrect armchair edits "trunk but with missing motorroad, let me add this!"

I/4 in this part is not a motorway (which starts south of Jíloviště), but not a motorroad, either (could have been in the past, maybe; irrelevant to current state).
silversurfer83 (2026-07-26 20:39:34+00:00): Hi :)

bitte keine addr:*=* an Objekte wie Wege (highway=*) oder auch Ladestationen. Es ist Konses, dass wir das in DE nicht nicht machen.

Falls du unbedingt Dinge "addressieren" möchtest, dann nutze bitte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:object:* danke. Bei Fragen immer raus damit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186370096
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-30 06:52:18+00:00): As far as I can tell, your mapping of this landuse area so far seems pretty correct here, thanks!
Frans S (2026-07-29 12:17:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Where highways run parallel to each other, like here, just map 1 highway (unclassified here)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1544666189/history#map=16/-23.23053/44.52563
Best regards
Ewen Hill (2026-07-26 01:27:48+00:00): Bonjour, This is regarding the vape shops you have added or updated in Australia and I am letting you know that I have reverted this changeset and the ones listed below for three reaasons. 
1. Shops cannot sell or advertise vapes and it is illegal to advertise under federal laws. Placing these sites on OpenStreetMap may breech these laws
2. This was a bulk import. Bulk imports need to be discussed with the community and I can not see any reference to this import
3. The veracity of the data is suspect and given that shops cannot sell vapes, it is difficult to understand how this dataset was curated.

This extensive revert has been communicated with the Data working Group (DWG)

Ewen Hill

Changesets: 186372926 186372923 186372921 186372918 186372914 186372913 186372909 186372907 186372906 186372900 186372899 186372898 186372897 186372896 186372895 186372894 186372892 186372891 186372889 186372878 186372875 186372872 186372870 186372865 186372863 186372861 186372859 186372856 186372839 186372837 186372834 186372832 186372830 186372827 186372823 186372821 186372817 186372816 186372812 186372808 186372756 186372749 186372628 186371111 186352714 186352697 186352693 186352685 186352669 186352667 186352640 186352625 186352369
aighes (2026-07-26 00:19:52+00:00): Which part of discuss each of your edits in the Forum ahead of time did you not understand.
aighes (2026-07-26 00:21:00+00:00): Which part of discuss each of your edits in the Forum ahead of time did you not understand.
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-07-26 00:17:42+00:00): What source did you use to confirm that these sections of Gage Boulevard are now under construction?

Also, please use more detailed changeset descriptions so that other mappers can see what you have added.
impiaaa (2026-07-27 18:17:30+00:00): Hello! Please use the changeset description to describe what you changed and why. For example, "Added a crossing and fixed crossing:markings using aerial imagery." You can find more examples here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thank you!
nerihv (2026-07-25 23:04:35+00:00): desplazado y mapeado con bing -8.96, 4.23.
Joel Koen (2026-07-26 09:29:30+00:00): Hello, I've changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800720343 back to motorway_link given its speed limit and restrictions. It's also sort of still an off ramp up to Sarawak Avenue.

Can your changeset comments be more descriptive? I've mentioned this on one of your changesets in the past, and it looks like someone else has asked you multiple times. Can you confirm you're even reading changeset comments??
Ewen Hill (2026-07-26 01:27:38+00:00): Bonjour, This is regarding the vape shops you have added or updated in Australia and I am letting you know that I have reverted this changeset and the ones listed below for three reaasons. 
1. Shops cannot sell or advertise vapes and it is illegal to advertise under federal laws. Placing these sites on OpenStreetMap may breech these laws
2. This was a bulk import. Bulk imports need to be discussed with the community and I can not see any reference to this import
3. The veracity of the data is suspect and given that shops cannot sell vapes, it is difficult to understand how this dataset was curated.

This extensive revert has been communicated with the Data working Group (DWG)

Ewen Hill

Changesets: 186372926 186372923 186372921 186372918 186372914 186372913 186372909 186372907 186372906 186372900 186372899 186372898 186372897 186372896 186372895 186372894 186372892 186372891 186372889 186372878 186372875 186372872 186372870 186372865 186372863 186372861 186372859 186372856 186372839 186372837 186372834 186372832 186372830 186372827 186372823 186372821 186372817 186372816 186372812 186372808 186372756 186372749 186372628 186371111 186352714 186352697 186352693 186352685 186352669 186352667 186352640 186352625 186352369
Ewen Hill (2026-07-26 01:27:28+00:00): Bonjour, This is regarding the vape shops you have added or updated in Australia and I am letting you know that I have reverted this changeset and the ones listed below for three reaasons. 
1. Shops cannot sell or advertise vapes and it is illegal to advertise under federal laws. Placing these sites on OpenStreetMap may breech these laws
2. This was a bulk import. Bulk imports need to be discussed with the community and I can not see any reference to this import
3. The veracity of the data is suspect and given that shops cannot sell vapes, it is difficult to understand how this dataset was curated.

This extensive revert has been communicated with the Data working Group (DWG)

Ewen Hill

Changesets: 186372926 186372923 186372921 186372918 186372914 186372913 186372909 186372907 186372906 186372900 186372899 186372898 186372897 186372896 186372895 186372894 186372892 186372891 186372889 186372878 186372875 186372872 186372870 186372865 186372863 186372861 186372859 186372856 186372839 186372837 186372834 186372832 186372830 186372827 186372823 186372821 186372817 186372816 186372812 186372808 186372756 186372749 186372628 186371111 186352714 186352697 186352693 186352685 186352669 186352667 186352640 186352625 186352369
Ewen Hill (2026-07-26 01:27:20+00:00): Bonjour, This is regarding the vape shops you have added or updated in Australia and I am letting you know that I have reverted this changeset and the ones listed below for three reaasons. 
1. Shops cannot sell or advertise vapes and it is illegal to advertise under federal laws. Placing these sites on OpenStreetMap may breech these laws
2. This was a bulk import. Bulk imports need to be discussed with the community and I can not see any reference to this import
3. The veracity of the data is suspect and given that shops cannot sell vapes, it is difficult to understand how this dataset was curated.

This extensive revert has been communicated with the Data working Group (DWG)

Ewen Hill

Changesets: 186372926 186372923 186372921 186372918 186372914 186372913 186372909 186372907 186372906 186372900 186372899 186372898 186372897 186372896 186372895 186372894 186372892 186372891 186372889 186372878 186372875 186372872 186372870 186372865 186372863 186372861 186372859 186372856 186372839 186372837 186372834 186372832 186372830 186372827 186372823 186372821 186372817 186372816 186372812 186372808 186372756 186372749 186372628 186371111 186352714 186352697 186352693 186352685 186352669 186352667 186352640 186352625 186352369
Ewen Hill (2026-07-26 01:27:06+00:00): Bonjour, This is regarding the vape shops you have added or updated in Australia and I am letting you know that I have reverted this changeset and the ones listed below for three reaasons. 
1. Shops cannot sell or advertise vapes and it is illegal to advertise under federal laws. Placing these sites on OpenStreetMap may breech these laws
2. This was a bulk import. Bulk imports need to be discussed with the community and I can not see any reference to this import
3. The veracity of the data is suspect and given that shops cannot sell vapes, it is difficult to understand how this dataset was curated.

This extensive revert has been communicated with the Data working Group (DWG)

Ewen Hill

Changesets: 186372926 186372923 186372921 186372918 186372914 186372913 186372909 186372907 186372906 186372900 186372899 186372898 186372897 186372896 186372895 186372894 186372892 186372891 186372889 186372878 186372875 186372872 186372870 186372865 186372863 186372861 186372859 186372856 186372839 186372837 186372834 186372832 186372830 186372827 186372823 186372821 186372817 186372816 186372812 186372808 186372756 186372749 186372628 186371111 186352714 186352697 186352693 186352685 186352669 186352667 186352640 186352625 186352369
Ewen Hill (2026-07-26 01:27:14+00:00): Bonjour, This is regarding the vape shops you have added or updated in Australia and I am letting you know that I have reverted this changeset and the ones listed below for three reaasons. 
1. Shops cannot sell or advertise vapes and it is illegal to advertise under federal laws. Placing these sites on OpenStreetMap may breech these laws
2. This was a bulk import. Bulk imports need to be discussed with the community and I can not see any reference to this import
3. The veracity of the data is suspect and given that shops cannot sell vapes, it is difficult to understand how this dataset was curated.

This extensive revert has been communicated with the Data working Group (DWG)

Ewen Hill

Changesets: 186372926 186372923 186372921 186372918 186372914 186372913 186372909 186372907 186372906 186372900 186372899 186372898 186372897 186372896 186372895 186372894 186372892 186372891 186372889 186372878 186372875 186372872 186372870 186372865 186372863 186372861 186372859 186372856 186372839 186372837 186372834 186372832 186372830 186372827 186372823 186372821 186372817 186372816 186372812 186372808 186372756 186372749 186372628 186371111 186352714 186352697 186352693 186352685 186352669 186352667 186352640 186352625 186352369