piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Quaternion (2024-01-04 13:47:09+00:00): Hallo HM7_501872,

du hast in deinem Änderungssatz ein sehr großes Waldstück in eine Wiese umgewandelt.

Grüße
Quaternion
HM7_501872 (2024-01-04 18:50:25+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, das war keine Absicht. Ich habe es wieder angepasst 

Grüße
Quaternion (2024-01-06 09:39:15+00:00): Danke!
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
Harald Hartmann (2024-01-03 15:48:31+00:00): Darf man fragen, warum du im Changeset vorher (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145703638) das Information-Board neu angelegt und hier an der alte Stelle nun gelöscht hast?
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-01 21:00:27+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1236124050

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mini-me (2024-01-26 04:13:50+00:00): А в addr:street? ;)
TrickyFoxy (2024-01-26 08:40:06+00:00): Помню об этом :) Школьную руками сейчас дофикшу, но вообще сейчас бота продумываю, чтобы сам аккуратно фиксил и предлагал по кнопке зафиксить.
pitfire (2024-01-02 03:58:01+00:00): From Hamburg to Toulouse
This change set is too large. Please limit a change set to a regional area.
Metzor (2024-01-02 09:08:24+00:00): Hi Aladefana,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Please also have a look at this page as you use StreetComplete:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F
Aladefana48 (2024-01-02 13:17:50+00:00): Sorry about that.

I was using StreetComplete and didn't know that editing streets which are far apart from each other would become one changeset.
I travel a lot and recently took pictures of the areas where I made the changes. I didn't yet contribute to OpenStreetMap then.

Is there some way to split this changeset into multiple parts after the fact?
Metzor (2024-01-02 13:40:34+00:00): Not that I know of. You need to upload before you make the next change. Enforcing upload is possible in the menu.
Have a nice 2024!
Aladefana48 (2024-01-02 18:02:51+00:00): Thank you!
gscholz (2024-01-02 08:26:27+00:00): Hi P-E_LRX,
the "Bora'ana Wildlife Conservancy" area you have edited here is not a valid boundary relation:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=39.58997&lat=0.18253&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.67&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145776628

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
tyfi (2024-01-01 21:40:45+00:00): I also added stop signs.
kjjj11223344 (2024-02-16 18:30:57+00:00): Hi, I don't believe Ilha Mexiana should have ways labelled as coastline. As they are inside the South America coast polygon.
osmuser63783 (2024-02-20 18:07:37+00:00): For more background see here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-coastlines-create-a-closed-polygon/109239
archpdx (2024-01-04 04:45:11+00:00): While functional classification maps are a good start to identify what highway classifications roads should be, I would avoid following them one hundred percent of the time. A lot of the times functional classifications are based on previously planned projects that were never completed. For example, Gilbert from La Palma to Orangethorpe was likely classified as a minor arterial because of a planned overpass over I-5.

Lately, the US community has been moving towards forming a coherent network for each classification, meaning that stubs, particularly secondary and above, should be avoided (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Highway_classification)

Here's a useful diary entry from another fellow mapper on classifying roads in the LA area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/willkmis/diary/399345
kjjj11223344 (2024-02-17 01:46:46+00:00): Should these be coastline? I think they should not, as then you have a coastline within the South America polygon.
Barroszt (2024-03-03 22:41:03+00:00): Dlaczego wycofujesz moje edycje, przecież poprawiłem tylko linię brzegową i dodałem jezioro??? Właśnie dlatego wolę, aby wycofali użytkownicy OpenStreetMap, którzy posługują się językiem polskim. Jest mi naprawdę przykro, że wycofanie wielu moich edycji odbyło się bez mojej wiedzy i straciłem wiele moich godzin, aby upiększyć moje kochane miasto. Zależy mi na tym, aby Toruń nie odbiegał od standardów OpenStreetMap. Serio, płakać aż się chce.
forstner-m (2024-01-07 08:48:48+00:00): Unfortunately, a few paths were set incorrectly. Everything is now repaired again. Please be careful with changes!
flohoff (2024-01-02 09:21:35+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier an den Straßeneigenschaften geschraubt. Das hat das routing ein bisschen geändert. Das ist auch gut so. Ich denke Durchgangsverkehr sollte nicht über Bergtorstraße, Wilhelmsplatz, Weingartenstraße, Bahnhofstraße laufen. Ist aber defakto im moment so:

Hier sieht man was da alles genutzt wird für Durchgangsverkehr:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?#52.30061,8.61521,16z

Man kann die segmente immer anklicken und sich eine Beispielroute zeigen lassen.

Hier war die Benachrichtung ausgelöst durch diesen Changeset:

https://gt.owl.de/pipermail/osm-owl-routeqa/2024-January/092209.html

Flo
Ökkel (2024-01-02 18:39:47+00:00): Ja, da hätten sich gerne noch mehr Routen ändern können. Die Bahnhofstraße ist halt Einfallstor zur Innenstadt ausgebaut, da kann ich nix verstellen.
flohoff (2024-01-02 20:09:22+00:00): Das ist ja so die typische route die da durch geht. Die Bahnhofstraße ist halt "zu gut" bzw die alternative über Berliner und Bohlenstraße ist zu schlecht.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=52.2939%2C8.6182%3B52.3139%2C8.6011#map=15/52.3038/8.6311&layers=N
flohoff (2024-01-02 20:13:35+00:00): Ich habe die Weingartenstraße mal mit lanes=1 getagged - Die ist ja schmal - ist strittig ob das passt, aber dadurch wird die deutlich schlechter. Mal sehen ob das hilft. Zusätzlich fehlte auf der Bohlenstraße noch einige segmente die kein lanes=2 hatten. Das hab ich hoffentlich auch korrigiert. 

Also kniffelig die nummer.

Flo
kjjj11223344 (2024-02-17 01:46:14+00:00): Should these be coastline? I think they should not, as then you have a coastline within the South America coastline polygon.
Tomas_J (2024-03-08 20:35:22+00:00): Zdravim, proč jste tohle smazal? Kemp na danem miste existuje, zmapoval jsem ho podle OSM zasady Map what's on the ground. Zda je legální nebo nelegální se nereší mazáním existujícich vecí z mapy.
JJIglesias (2024-01-02 04:23:10+00:00): Gracias por la Edicion pero al Borrar las vias de acceso al Estacionamiento del Banco Economico, esa area de estacionamiento queda INUTIL para efectos del mapa y navegacion. Toda area de ESTACIONAMIENTO tiene que tener una via de acceso conectada de lo contrario solo es un dibujo o una figurita. El mapa de OSM NO es un mapa de figuritas es un MAPA lógico que es usado por procesos y algoritmos de Navegacion.
Por favor restituye los accesos si los conoces para que el mapa funcione como debe ser.
Gracias
JJ
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-01 23:10:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11477132087

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Ferrocarriles de México (2024-03-14 23:10:53+00:00): You added `oneway=yes` to the railway track. This is incorrect.
Trevor_1 (2024-03-14 23:53:43+00:00): Sorry, I meant to only tag the road
Bexhill-OSM (2024-01-02 19:23:40+00:00): You're deleting good data, the 15mph is signposted all around Wartling Dr.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-01-02 22:06:44+00:00): Oh I must have forgot to update that. I'll add them back
Bexhill-OSM (2024-01-03 21:54:03+00:00): Okay, I have concerns to your sources of information, there has been a few times where shop names have been deleted and fixme's have been removed for no apparent reason which I have had to revert.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-01-04 00:42:20+00:00): Unadopted roads do not continue the speed limits of adopted roads, and so I removed the speed limits except those erected by road owners themselves (e.g. 10 mph). I retained (or meant to until you pointed out I forgot) the limits around the old military base because of this. I've not gone near any shop names or fixmes here so not sure what you mean by that.
Bexhill-OSM (2024-01-04 02:11:54+00:00): In changeset 138264262 you deleted some shop names, specifically The Barber Shop, Hair Lounge (eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313485456/history) and Seafood - took me a couple of months to notice.
I understand you are cleaning up some of the data, the majority of which is fine, but my concern is about not losing good data which has happened a few times now.
Nathan_A_RF (2024-01-04 08:51:06+00:00): My apologies, occasionally iD does strange things with my laptop and doesn't undo even though it looks like it has
kwiatek_123 (2024-01-08 21:04:09+00:00): Dzięki za edycję!
jarno_o (2024-01-02 15:31:56+00:00): First of a two-part changeset. The other is 145779418.
jarno_o (2024-01-02 15:32:45+00:00): Second of a two-part changeset (which I inadvertently gave a different summary due to a resolved merge conflict). The first is 145779415.
Jrachi (2024-01-04 07:56:40+00:00): Grazie della correzzione su alcuni tratti della SP22. A forza di cambiare i cambiamenti mi sono confuso.
Però anche tu non scherzi!
Nella SP2 hai messo primary anche con una sola carreggiata.
Due carreggiate sono obbligatorie per definire secondary?
Ma dove lo hai letto?
La classificazione per importanza e la posizione nella gerarchia della rete?
Ci possono essere tratti con qualche confusione ma andare a tappeto come stai facendo tu non è collaborare ad un progetto condiviso.

Ivo
"
Fedurli (2024-01-04 16:28:24+00:00): Ciao, non c'è alcun tratto della SP2 a carreggiata singola, ma sempre almeno 2 carreggiate separate da linea di mezzaria (1 per senso di marcia), uno dei requisiti (oltre alle città o PDI che collega) per classificare una strada come secondary o primary. Strade come SP22 o la SP30 non hanno linea di mezzaria, oltre al fatto che collegano centri di importanza minore senza PDI rilevanti.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dsecondary
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dtertiary
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-14 04:43:15+00:00): Do not partially overlap landcovers.
fortera_au (2024-01-02 00:14:03+00:00): You've changed the entirety of Virginia Peninsula into water and a golf hazard, please ensure your edits are correct.
Lucifer42 (2024-01-02 00:54:03+00:00): And I have already fixed it. I only needed it that way temporarily for it to show up in my course design editor
fortera_au (2024-01-02 00:57:12+00:00): Changes should not be made temporarily for a specific application, as the contents of the OSM DB could be pulled at any moment, leading to some kind of downstream user ending up with incorrect data. If you need these changes temporarily for your own use, you're best off finding a way to take a copy/extract of the OSM DB to make your changes in and use that.
Lucifer42 (2024-01-02 01:00:40+00:00): Undersrood. If tou guys are going to get on me for that, you should get in the people that do a horrible job splining and use a connected line instead of an area. I would think that would make more of a downstream issue
tastrax (2024-01-02 01:50:09+00:00): Don’t worry, we love all golf mappers equally.
fortera_au (2024-01-02 01:52:48+00:00): Adding less accurate but still valid data is fine, if you find it and can fix it, please do. Setting a peninsula to water, is not correct and should never go into OSM.
Lucifer42 (2024-01-02 01:56:14+00:00): Wont happen again
Lucifer42 (2024-01-02 02:00:09+00:00): And not trying to be rude, but as we soeak i have another guy ripping me up for fixing a course where splines didnt even come close to lining up to features, they had everything done incorrectly. It was easier to just delete features and recreate them one at a time. And he is pissed because i didnt edit them i remade them
fortera_au (2024-01-02 02:07:28+00:00): That's because "Keep the history" is one of the things OSM tries to live by. If you can just change what already exists (include an existing node in a new way, or expand/change the existing way), that's always preferred to just deleting and recreating the object.

Might be worth giving https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice a quick read for more info.
Lucifer42 (2024-01-02 02:14:09+00:00): So in that instance, splines were WAY off in shaoe and location. They used closed lines instead of the area tool so the proper labels werent available, and it would not let me merge the line into an area so they were just a closed loop of a line.
fortera_au (2024-01-02 02:19:49+00:00): There isn't a concept of lines vs areas in OSM, they're open and closed ways. If you need to you can set area=yes on a closed way, but usually other tags will indicate whether it's an area or just a line that loops on itself. i.e. landuse tags will indicate an area, highway usually won't.
Lucifer42 (2024-01-02 02:24:44+00:00): So thats the issue, as far as golf features go fairways, greens, tee boxes, sand traps all need to be “areas” otherwise they cannot be tagged in a way the editor software will recognize. I say line bs area since i edit in my web browser and i have to choose between point, line, or area. If i close loop a line, i cannot label things correctly, my software doesn’t recognize it and i cannot receeate the course for tgc 2019
fortera_au (2024-01-02 02:30:11+00:00): OSM doesn't have a concept of an area, a closed way that's tagged appropriately can be treated as an area. If your software doesn't correctly treat that as an area, then the software needs to be fixed. iD should be able to extend a way to make into a closed way with no problems.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-02 00:20:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223115719

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
syntex (2025-07-03 23:20:09+00:00): Naprawione
fortera_au (2024-01-02 11:08:54+00:00): Is this unit 18, house number 50? If so, it probably should be tagged as addr:unit=18, addr:housenumber=50
canfe (2024-01-02 07:12:04+00:00): Pregasi indicare il link dove è stato stabilito che è un "abuso usare il prefisso di una località".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145780228
Jrachi (2024-01-02 09:20:57+00:00): Scusa, Fedurli, ma con le correzioni stai introducendo nuovi e vecchi errori.
Guarda la name=Borgata Massa dove hai rimesso place=neighbourhood
goldfndr (2024-01-02 00:47:25+00:00): bollards should be away from road.
mlysle (2024-01-02 09:40:35+00:00): And I got my cat at the other animal shelter in town.
Matt McCutchen (2025-07-06 18:35:50+00:00): I noticed that the remapping of shops from nodes to areas in this changeset lost some tags from shops I had previously edited.  I restored those tags in https://osm.org/changeset/168573989.  I haven't checked whether tags were lost from other shops in this changeset too.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 04:13:12+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164878689
Hufkratzer (2024-01-02 19:04:26+00:00): Hi,
You have retagged this object from a building to a riding stables (leisure=horse_riding). Therefore it is no longer rendered as a building on the map. But it looks like a building on Bing. If it is a stable building you can tag it building=stable (and there is also a preset for that in iD).

The tag leisure=horse_riding shall be used for the whole facility. I would recommend to add a separate object (area or node) for this whole facility .

And https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/816835472 doesn't seem to be a riding stables either, it looks like a riding arena and should be tagged leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian (and there is also a preset for that in iD).

Compare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aleisure%3Dhorse_riding
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1005924061
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2434557134
Hufkratzer (2024-02-22 17:04:20+00:00): improved by me
nevw (2024-01-02 05:04:37+00:00): Hi
you need to add a node to where the house is that you operate from and add all your tags to that instead of adding your tags to the area tagged as residential.
fortera_au (2024-01-03 03:07:11+00:00): Changeset reverted, please tag the specific house, not the landuse=residential area.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145821107
tyfi (2024-01-02 01:24:37+00:00): I also used Bing StreetSide to locate where on US54 the speed limit changes.
literan (2024-01-02 12:57:44+00:00): Мята Lounge это не кафе, а кальянные. Исправлю.
Syl (2024-01-02 09:12:05+00:00): Salut, j'ai modifié la valeur de network. Pour les valeurs multiples c'est un point-virgule sans espace qui est utilisé. J'ai aussi mis le nom de l'Heureux Cyclage en toutes lettres, cette valeur était déjà utilisée ainsi dans d'autre villes et ça évite de potentielles confusions.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-02 06:49:08+00:00): Because you have deleted the multipolygon relation with your changes, the islands in the pond have disappeared.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-02 06:57:06+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15542
une abeille (2024-01-02 14:37:56+00:00): Hi there, several of these buildings should be divided much more than they are.

Rapid Editor is useful more for standalone houses than it is for series of plexes. If you'd like to use it, some of the areas up on the East end of the Island or in Laval might be good places to start, since they have many standalone buildings.

In addition, please use the offset of 0.6,-1.54 for the Bing imagery in the region of Montreal, as specified on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Montr%C3%A9al
Mingwei (2024-01-09 20:56:55+00:00): nice
MooPoo7 (2024-01-05 00:21:44+00:00): Why did you tag driveways as sidewalks and leave them disconnected from the road??
Xinran Yuan (2024-01-05 23:23:25+00:00): Hi, sorry those were edits made months ago. Do you want me to go delete all of those driveways?
MooPoo7 (2024-01-06 00:26:30+00:00): These edits were made 4 days ago according to the changeset. You don’t have to delete them, but change them to driveways and make sure they are properly connected to the road. I fixed some of them, but if I missed any feel free to correct them.
MooPoo7 (2024-01-06 00:29:16+00:00): Sorry about the time comment, I just looked through the history for them and saw that you did actually create them a few months ago, and just edited them 4 days ago. Apologies
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-01-29 11:07:42+00:00): Why you deleted this? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5277605670/history
JackVGT (2024-01-30 17:10:34+00:00): Just stream-lining everything if you want you can set a tag on the blocks for your specific house.
habi (2024-01-03 19:23:12+00:00): Ciao sjheBRN

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Das Gebäude vom Loeb in Bern hat mehr als drei Stockwerke, siehe http://images.gadmin.st.s3.amazonaws.com/n30443/images/bern/teaser/shopping_loeb.jpg

Das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151850059 war schon in der sog. Relation Südstrasse, was für 'Neulinge' etwas schwer zu sehen sind, aber adresstechnisch für OpenStreetMap schon korrekt erfasst ist.

Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49138782/ hast du einen Knoten der Zuggeleise über das Lorraineviadukt verschoben, genau wie die nette Toilette https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7643601471 und bei der Fricktreppe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/740790092 

Ich werde diesen Änderungssatz deshalb rückgängig machen, dann könnten die gewünschten Änderungen nochmals korrekt eingegeben werden.

E Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
habi (2024-01-03 19:24:50+00:00): Änderungssatz revertiert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145852172
PinRPG (2024-01-02 06:16:40+00:00): The change is causing the footpaths to intersect with the buildings, and also has duplicate entries concerning the building (e.g. w1236167006, w1220095055 and w473202641)

The previous version is likely still flawed, but the newer one is tripping the standard validator.
OttawaHiking (2024-01-05 00:24:46+00:00): Please take a look at building:part key. Here w1236167006 describes the outline of the building and w473202641 and w1220095055 reflect parts of the building that are different in height.

If a footway crossing a building, the editor that I use, JOSM, gives a warning, not an error. I have now split the footway into parts and the part under the roof is now tagged with covered=yes.
habi (2024-01-03 20:12:23+00:00): Ciao sjheBRN
Beim Restaurant hast du die Öffnungszeiten zwar verständlich, aber nicht maschinenlesbar eingetragen.
Ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145853430 korrigiert.
E schöne Abe no,
habi
i2004 (2024-01-02 17:27:58+00:00): te agrege el ramal corto del 437
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-06 08:59:44+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The changeset comment and the mapping seems impressive. Keep mapping and contribute to open mapping. Happy mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145782520
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-01-09 02:43:59+00:00): 你一直在画驾校道路，但是道路弯弯曲曲歪歪扭扭，正方形的部分也没有按一下Q标准化，和卫星图的对齐一塌糊涂
你这些真的不如全都扬了重画，这个驾校对应区域我会扬了重新画一下给您打个样
dankarran (2024-01-03 15:06:37+00:00): The cycle lanes on the viaduct are largely open now, though with temporary crossings in place still.

There's Mapillary imagery from 31 December.
MacLondon (2024-01-04 14:47:39+00:00): Thanks. I did some more edits along here last night, and also at the recently removed roundabout. Your recent Mapillary imagery was invaluable.
dankarran (2024-01-08 14:01:40+00:00): Glad it helped. Thanks for tidying things up.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-03-07 04:21:25+00:00): Công ơi, có gì sau này tuyến đường nào 1 chiều xe hơi, để giúp anh oneway=yes và oneway:motorcycle = no để chỉ cho xe hơi, xe tải đi một chiều được rõ ràng hơn nhé. oneway:motorcycle=no thì sẽ tự động hiểu là xe máy đi được 2 chiều. Thứ 2 nữa là để hiện thị mũi tên chỉ hướng của đường được rõ ràng hơn
Tech Dec (2024-03-28 12:41:34+00:00): Does the park really jut out to the north into Inverell Court? Bing and Esri only show a residential property there.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145783602