piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nevw (2026-01-17 00:21:53+00:00): Hi, I have reverted the living street with the name of "sun flats road" you added over top of existing tracks.
Can you further explain what you are trying to add so that we can help you do it properly.
NeisBot (2026-01-17 17:07:55+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 14 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1198317261 v1 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1198317252 v1 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/11116618494 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177314547
NeisReview (2026-01-25 08:44:09+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177323078
uprkos (2026-02-18 20:28:54+00:00): Czy to są nazwy obowiązujące i używane współcześnie? Jeśli nie, nie powinny być umieszczone na mapie OSM, ponieważ to wprowadza w błąd. Mapa zawiera stan współczesny i aktualny. Miejscem na takie dane może być openhistoricalmap.org.
uprkos (2026-07-13 22:24:14+00:00): Ponawiam pytanie - na mapie pojawiły się nazwy, które na 99% nie są w użyciu i nikt o nich nie słyszał.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-17 07:10:39+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19486
mueschel (2026-01-20 14:17:52+00:00): Hi,
"fuel:two-stroke_mix" is not a common tag - which of the documented fuel types is this?  fuel:1_50, fuel:1_25?
QuiLe (2026-01-17 06:22:18+00:00): Thanks for your contributions! It looks like you may have added your unit number. Usually we would apply this directly to the buidling itself and merge the points together and add all the units, ranges.Since the Brea itself is a 4 building complex adding the proper landuse would also be adequate. I haven't been to the Brea in a few weeks, but I can try to map this area when I'm back.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177315293
HaritaDuzenlemeHesabi (2026-01-17 09:36:04+00:00): Merhaba. Uydu görüntülerinde görünen bazı yapıları silmişsiniz. Örneğin şu üç cami uydu görüntülerinde görünüyor. Fakat silmişsiniz. Bu camiler yıkıldı mı, neden sildiniz? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/831744585

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/831744588

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/884190889

Aynı durum başka binalar için de geçerli, tek tek yazmıyorum onları.

Yolları silip aynı yere yeniden çizmişsiniz. Lütfen böyle yapmayınız, mevcut yolu silmeden düzenleyiniz. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Ayrıca silip yeniden çizdiğiniz bazı yolların yeri çok az değişmiş. Bu tür değişiklikler, maalesef harcadığınız zamana ya da emeğinize değecek değişiklikler değil. Çünkü uydu görüntüleri düşündüğünüz kadar yüksek çözünürlüklü ve hizalı değil. Bilginize. Ayrıca bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery

Değişiklik açıklamanıza sadece bir . koymuşsunuz. Lütfen değişiklik açıklamanızda kısaca ne yaptığınızı yazınız. Bkz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

İyi günler.
DD1GJ (2026-01-17 10:45:17+00:00): Revert, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177326472
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-19 14:04:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177430386 where the changeset comment is: sockenpuppen-edits revertiert
Benoît C MdP (2026-01-20 09:43:24+00:00): Bonjour Toinetoine44.

Merci pour ta contribution. Concernant la piste cyclable de la rue du Général Brunet, le fait de la raccourcir fait qu'elle n'est plus accessible depuis la place au nord. J'ai corrigé.

Benoît
literan (2026-01-17 09:22:42+00:00): он уже отмечен https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11084012784
Cele078 (2026-01-18 12:57:10+00:00): Ciao mamo,
vedo che usi il tag width= in maniera errata, l'unità di misura è il metro.

Inoltre per https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1467684814
sulle ortofoto si vede poco più a est un ponte, sei sicuro che non sia quello? Inoltre hai taggato tutta la strada come ponte.

Saluti,
Cele
mamo78 (2026-01-18 14:16:52+00:00): Buongiorno.
Grazie per la risposta.
Non si tratta di un ponte, ma di un nuovo tratta di sterrato di recente costruzione.
Purtroppo non sono molto pratico e devo aver sbagliato altro perché su openrunner il tratto è segnalato, ma riesco ad inserirlo in nessun percorso.
Puoi aiutarmi a capire?
Grazie
Cele078 (2026-01-19 14:54:10+00:00): Ciao,
tranquillo, ho fatto anche io gli stessi errori le prime volte!
Ho provveduto a sistemare la strada sterrata (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177432386), se vuoi puoi verificare se l'ho fatto correttamente. Segnalo anche che il tag motor_vehicle=no probabilmente è errato, immagino che sia piuttosto =agricultural o private (di solito c'è un cartello a inizio strada che definisce il divieto).

Per la traccia leggera nell'erba c'è da correggere il tag width= e forse vale la pena aggiungere informal=yes, te lo lascio fare a te! :)

Se hai domande specifiche chiedi pure

Saluti,
Cele
mamo78 (2026-01-19 15:53:41+00:00): Grazie.
Ancora una domanda perché su openrunner non me la fa usare?
Cele078 (2026-01-19 20:01:20+00:00): Nessuna idea, non conosco openrunner
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-21 01:56:07+00:00): This is in the middle of a paved intersection where adding a camera would be physically impossible.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177316422
K12230LF (2026-03-30 10:19:19+00:00): Thank you for your comment. So can you revert your modification made here regarding Occitan ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13040079575/history#map=19/43.945545/4.459998&layers=N
conifermapper do sul (2026-03-30 10:40:20+00:00): Lenga en galha, fasètz pas una montanha d'un tuc de talpa! Mas mercés d'èsser tan atentiu
silversurfer83 (2026-01-18 13:53:08+00:00): Hello again

Please DO NOT delete objects you intend to change. The building just needed refinement. The service way only needed a bit of adjustment.

Remeber https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

and please do not connect highways and landuse like you did here. Highways should only connect to barriers and other highways. Placing the barrier on the landuse isn't helpful at all.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177316939
ratrun (2026-01-17 17:05:19+00:00): Could you please check the new ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1467690451, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1467690452 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1467690454. It is very unlikely that their tagging as secondary with the high maxspeed is correct given the bing imaginary in the area an and the nearby way topology.
seichter (2026-01-17 17:26:26+00:00): Thanks for the hint.
It's of course an error.
I use to tag series of new tracks by command "insert previous tags". I must have pointed to EM 322 before without noticing it and thus copied tags to these ways.
In JOSM this results only in a slightly different colour, in standard OSM map it's obvious.
Have fixed it.
Bondi Maps (2026-01-17 04:03:07+00:00): En mi opinión, estaría bueno dejarle Av. San Pedrito porque 1ro lo dice el cartel, 2do me parece más correcto.
Fraxi (2026-01-17 09:21:58+00:00): Здравейте!
За църквата и всички останали точки на интерес(POI), както Ви е писал Dimitar155, не са нужни имена, които да ги описват. Ако примерно това е храм и носи името "Св. Йоан Кръстител", такова име може да сложите(без кавичките). Ето повече на:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
И по принцип в wiki.openstreetmap.org можете да се ориентирате какви са стандартите за редакции в OSM.
eggie (2026-01-17 08:34:52+00:00): Hoi,
Het 'huisje' staat volgens de BAG en PDOK iets zuidelijker. Ik heb het verplaatst.
MVG
eggie
silversurfer83 (2026-01-16 21:58:28+00:00): sorry. forgot the comment. reverted what looks like intentional deletion of military objects. user doesn't respond to comments...
silversurfer83 (2026-01-18 08:30:23+00:00): Moin :)

du hast hier einen Adress-node verschoben:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9985967900

guck mal bitte, ob das Absicht war.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177317169
GenGap (2026-01-18 18:08:05+00:00): Gude!
Ja, war ein Versehen, danke für den Hinweis!
ika-chan! (2026-01-18 00:45:17+00:00): The current situation is to map the motorway at toll plazas as a single way, because there are reversible lanes that is demand-responsive (in this case, four). To prevent u-turns, we use turn restrictions.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177356936
Константин Гам (2026-02-19 09:27:33+00:00): Исправляя адреса, вы удалили действуещее название магазина - не надо так, пожалуйста
NeisBot (2026-01-17 17:08:05+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 15 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/159956260 v4 | 7 crossings
https://osm.org/way/671258111 v2 | 7 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1720241463 v6

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177318245
NeisReview (2026-01-25 08:44:10+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/177423123
pwbriggs (2026-01-26 18:11:36+00:00): Thanks. The extra node ("point") is redundant—the tags on the way ("area") take care of that.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element for more info.

Thanks again for the contributions, and happy mapping!
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-16 23:25:44+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177318999
Tye The Cool Guy (2026-01-17 16:34:38+00:00): Nice
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-16 23:25:45+00:00): DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177318999
Tye The Cool Guy (2026-01-17 16:34:26+00:00): Nice
Bondi Maps (2026-01-17 00:08:58+00:00): Fui a la municipalidad de Pilar a pedir un mapa con los límites. Te voy a revertir el cambio, saludos.
mueschel (2026-01-20 14:26:37+00:00): Hallo,
was ist denn "building_was = house"? Wurde hier abgerissen?
Teddy73 (2026-01-20 15:37:37+00:00): Hi, das ist ein temporärer Tag von mir zur schnelleren Bearbeitung, den ich normalerweise vor Upload wieder zurück ändere. Hier hatte ich das vergessen. Ist nun korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis!
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:32:26+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/1201243084 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Salon de coiffure à Québec"
---
Par exemple, une version plus neutre et factuelle de ton texte pourrait être : « Salon de coiffure à Québec »
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:59:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177672957
(No visible changes after review)
Dimitar155 (2026-01-17 08:48:23+00:00): Здравейте и добре дошли в OSM!

Благодаря за направените промени!

За имена на улици е прието да не се слага "ул." отпред (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#Имена_на_улици_и_булеварди).

При номерата на сградите се слага самия номера, без "№".

За "точки на интерес" (кметство, хранителен магазин, поща и т.н.) е желателно да се използват съответните шаблони в редактора.

Ако имате въпроси, оставам на разположение.

Поздрави,
Митко
laznik (2026-02-08 15:47:59+00:00): K budovam v lome chodim uz roky, ale nikdy so si nevsimol ze by to bol vojensky priestor. Nie je tam ani zakaz vstupu a vedie tadial aj znackovana tur. trasa. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529712028/history#map=19/48.474619/19.013713
macdale (2026-02-09 11:32:47+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za komentar. Oznacenie ako vojenskeho priestoru mam od isteho pana. Spominal zeby sa malo jednat o byvaly sklad vojenskej techniky/chemikalii a malo by to mat suvis s nedalekym lomom. Bolo to vsak par rokov dozadu, preto ak mate blizsie info o tomto priestore, prosim doplnte/zmente. Povodne som to oznacil znackou disuse no aby sa to nezobrazovalo ako funkcny vojensky priestor, doplnil som vcera prefix abandoned:landuse.
NeisBot (2026-01-17 17:08:11+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 8 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1121020418 v1 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/452352237 v5 | 4 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/10253440838 v3

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177319870
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-17 17:14:20+00:00): Should be fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177326870
𒂼𒄄　 (2026-01-17 02:24:32+00:00): ارى انك قمت بتعديل نقطة سوبرماركت 
وحذف نقاط مكررة، لكن لماذا قمت بحذف النقطة التي عمرها 9 سنوات وابقيت الاحدث منها؟ 
لماذا لم تنقل الاسم باللغة العربية للمكان الذي ابقيته؟     

انا اتكلم بخصوص هذا:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6575303978/history

والتي حذفتهم هم: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4368801089/history

كذلك:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11065547268/history
skibidi_cameraman (2026-01-30 00:26:16+00:00): These are not Flock safety cameras. Please adjust the tags accordingly. For more information on what these cameras are for, see:
https://www.pressdemocrat.com/2016/10/18/crimebeat-qa-are-video-cameras-on-top-of-santa-rosas-stop-lights-recording-me/
NeisBot (2026-01-17 17:08:13+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 31 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/250480009 v4 | 26 crossings
https://osm.org/way/251549200 v3 | 5 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1309492918 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177320317
muralito (2026-01-27 23:25:20+00:00): Hi. Please do not blindly follow iD suggestions. All those schools should be tagged operator:type=public, not government.
Berdly (2026-01-28 18:54:52+00:00): @muralito forgive me, I thought it was simply an outdated tag. I don’t really see the difference between government and public tagging personally so I didn’t see an issue with it, sorry
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:32:28+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13461469670 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Moving company in Portland OR"

#MapWithoutSpam
tguen (2026-01-25 00:01:45+00:00): I just removed this business. It was from an SEO spam note, the website doesn't work and the facebook page is barely used for years.
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-21 01:58:37+00:00): This is in the middle of a paved intersection where adding a camera would be physically impossible.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177321059
Baloo Uriza (2026-01-21 01:58:58+00:00): This is in the middle of a paved intersection where adding a camera would be physically impossible.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177321090
detective-fiasco (2026-01-18 21:29:37+00:00): V tomto changesetu jsem omylem upravil node/11716761947

Chyba vznikla tak, že jsem ve svém forknutém editoru iD omylem rozkliknul toto návěstidlo, a to bylo automaticky upraveno.

Vzhledem k diskutovanému revertu na návěstidlo zatím nebudu dále sahat, počkám až, jak to dopadne.
NeisBot (2026-01-17 17:08:17+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 48 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/825935300 v4 | 9 crossings
https://osm.org/way/894102318 v1 | 8 crossings
https://osm.org/way/894102316 v1 | 8 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/2189279140 v6
https://osm.org/node/8310098130 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177321474
mueschel (2026-01-21 11:04:06+00:00): Hi,
here are 4 ways without proper tags, could you check that? 
e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1467721224
colt04 (2026-01-17 03:41:57+00:00): removed the camera record - it doesn't exist on that location
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:32:32+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13461599287 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Le Condé BKK1 apartment building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:59:10+00:00): 🗑️🤖 Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/177672958

 If you believe this deletion was incorrect or would like to clarify the intent of the original tags, please reply here.
TrickyFoxy (2026-01-18 15:28:55+00:00): Не пишите названия КАПСОМ
literan (2026-01-19 13:46:58+00:00): да таких названий и малыми буквами не надо
literan (2026-01-19 14:42:11+00:00): откатил
TrickyFoxy (2026-04-03 23:05:55+00:00): как интересно, сразу несколько аккаунтов редактировавших здесь поудаляли свои аккаунты
AndyR_Tui_NZ (2026-02-03 06:10:46+00:00): Hi. Can you please have a look at the conversation areas that are marked up in the Waiau Lagoon and river mouth areas.  They are a bit confusing and seem to straddle land and water but not clearly follow features.  I've just started tweaking the Waiau river route south from Tuatapere and want to make sure that I don't make your conservation areas look completely bonkers when I map the river to the LINZ aerials.   Andy
❤️‍🔥 (2026-02-03 22:59:28+00:00): Hi Andy, these riverbanks/islands change after every flood, and I guess DOC doesn't update the legal boundaries when that happens, which is why we get such a  mismatch. 

I've merged these boundaries together now to keep this area more organized , so feel free to keep editing around here :)

Cheers,
Kyle
inas (2026-01-17 04:52:05+00:00): Oops.  Accidentally deleted relation 6282345 here.  WIll identify issue and fix.
OnlyAppleCanDo (2026-01-17 05:07:06+00:00): 应该按照实际标识牌及深圳海事局实际管辖范围为准
https://www.msa.gov.cn/page/article.do?articleId=F4D61DBE-076C-4DB2-AAED-52F69D99648C
深圳与中山和广州的界线在：22.5500,113.7618
深中通道区域：西人工岛及隧道范围属深圳，西人工岛以西范围属中山http://youke.xn--y7xa690gmna.cn/s1/2026/01/17/696afc58e496b.webp
（指示牌在人工岛与深中通道桥梁右侧护栏墙）
你的深圳主张界并非实际管理界线，而是 深圳市海洋发展规划（2023-2035年）的规划范围线
旧加卷 (2026-01-17 08:54:03+00:00): 在此只讨论编辑行为问题。划界相关问题已整合进 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177124572#c1541100
aharvey (2026-01-31 05:30:45+00:00): I updated the tags for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13461688921/history and in doing so I changed the operator:type
Tommybara (2026-01-23 19:05:08+00:00): Phiền bạn xem kỹ lại được không? Đoạn dưới tên là đường Đặng Văn Trước các bảng hiệu nhà dân đều để tên đó mà.
LordGarySugar (2026-01-17 05:33:45+00:00): Correction: the real overpass query is https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2iSW - includes parent ways for loading into josm
LordGarySugar (2026-01-30 04:37:57+00:00): Thanks for making these changes! I've made some adjustments to the access roads here (unclassified roads are intended for rural roads, not access to car parks). The other tags were added correctly, for example the address and opening hours, so thanks for your contributions!
arjunaraoc (2026-01-18 10:00:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177365982#map=15/17.83038/83.08339
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177323423
pwbriggs (2026-02-03 00:26:00+00:00): Hey, I noticed you added a tag "ref:"="id3king=248". Did you mean "ref:id3king"="248"? Seems like the tag name was split accidentally.

There are a few more of these that I found on https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/ref: so if you know what these tags are, do you mind fixing those? Also it would be nice to have a documentation page on the wiki. I've never heard of id3king, is it some data source?
mueschel (2026-01-17 13:21:24+00:00): Hi,
something doesn't seem to be right here. There are 12 objects with a strange "ref:" key. Could you check that?
bigpaolo (2026-01-17 17:05:36+00:00): Tutto OK
bigpaolo (2026-01-17 17:08:17+00:00): Vai a 
https://www.id3king.it/Uscite/U2019/Uscita963/indice_963.htm
mueschel (2026-01-17 17:19:36+00:00): A key can't end with a colon - it should be either 'ref' or 'ref:XYZ'.
JeroenHoek (2026-01-19 17:22:09+00:00): Don't forget to use the name-tag for the new name. You left out the name-tag in this changeset by changing name into old_name. The official_name-tag should become name=*.
JeroenHoek (2026-01-20 13:54:02+00:00): Fixed here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177473349

(official_name is kept, name just duplicates it.)
SG86 (2026-01-20 23:38:03+00:00): Thanks for fixing it
eggie (2026-01-17 08:28:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community