piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
emersonveenstra (2024-10-22 18:25:41+00:00): Yeah, looking back at should probably be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dequestrian since it's selling tacks and spurs for horses, among other things, but i dont think i saw that value at the time. I'll change it
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-23 14:00:58+00:00): Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 05:23:04+00:00): Hello!

You used
landuse=FARMY
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/473793417/history

Have you maybe meant
landuse=farm
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
herisusa (2025-05-13 21:13:36+00:00): Hello Mateusz,
now it is "farmyard".
FARMY was wrong.
eggie (2024-01-31 15:46:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
opendcc (2024-01-31 17:33:23+00:00): Der Bauhof in Griesbach ist Mitte 23 umgezogen. Was sind Deine Quelle - es sieht nach semi-mechanical Edit aus.
olo81 (2024-02-16 11:24:55+00:00): nazwy opisowe, do poprawy
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
literan (2026-07-12 09:13:28+00:00): и зачем вы здесь ядерный реактор добавили?
mavl (2024-02-23 18:52:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147818131, 147828921 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
Frans S (2024-02-05 10:27:01+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Inaccurate mapped.
Collected multiple buildings as 1 building
Not squared buildings. 


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146909426
Manuele R (2024-02-01 10:08:20+00:00): Die Gebäude 38 und 40 sind auf der Ebene Erdgeschoss verbunden. Dort findet sich auch der neue Tierpark-Shop.
Fijord (2024-02-26 14:32:50+00:00): Vielen Dank, habe es noch ergänzt.
eggie (2024-01-31 15:49:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Gebouwen kun je niet uitlijnen op grond van schuingenomen luchtfoto's  Dat is niet de plek waar het gebouw staat.
Alle gebouwen zijn ingemeten door het kadaster en alszodanig geïmporteerd in OSM. 
Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je een terugmelding doen naar het Kadaster. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-01-31 15:59:51+00:00): Gebouw hersteld....  overkapping apart ingetekend als roof. 
Bij BAG updates komt anders toch de oude vorm weer terug. 
Mapse
eggie
chnuessli (2024-02-02 10:39:12+00:00): Wieso????
chnuessli (2024-02-04 09:12:33+00:00): Ich habe den Defibrillator wiederhergestellt da die Löschung ungerechtfertigt war.
Fijord (2024-02-26 11:40:50+00:00): Perfekt, vielen Dank und einen Gruss.
eggie (2024-01-31 16:00:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-01-31 16:03:06+00:00): Dag DrD   Graag alleen de adresnodes gebruiken om op bij te taggen  Geen adressen zelf aanmaken. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-31 16:04:09+00:00): Het adres heb ik vast verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-14 21:19:10+00:00): Why were these relations added then deleted?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146909992
Map-Peter (2024-02-02 00:01:44+00:00): Hello Alexey,

is this "fee=no" ?

Greeting Peter
Alexey Vazhnov (2024-02-02 08:33:34+00:00): Yes, it is free.
Added. Thanks!
Map-Peter (2024-02-02 17:20:00+00:00): Good to know for my next bicycle trip to Waren this summer (a long way for me). Than I can spend more of my little money for food. Thank you! :-)
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-31 15:52:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Josieniczy":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11573472190

"Osiedle Bucznik":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11573472408

"Osiedle Skolnity":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11573472411
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11573472555
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11573472557
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11573472559

"dr Michała Grażyńskiego":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11573472445
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11573472447

"Przy Skoczni":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11573472482

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2024-02-16 04:14:38+00:00): Since in US there’s no official regulatory body managing hotel star ratings and each hotel can rate themselves however many stars they want, it serves no purpose other than promotional/advertisement for the hotels.

As such, the use of stars=* tag should be deprecated.
gscholz (2024-02-11 06:50:17+00:00): Hi Ibrahim ,
your recent edits have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=7.43015&lat=10.53795&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146910827

Can you please fix this?

This kind of result is very typical for JOSM users who just press "o" and do not care about the results. You can apply the internal validator to avoid uploading such errors.

Kind regards
Guido
jeslop (2024-01-31 17:54:19+00:00): Reverted on changeset

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146915141
jeslop (2024-01-31 17:55:15+00:00): soyandaluz, no cambies de nuevo el nombre, ese es el correcto. Mira el apartado de nombres del wiki.

Saludos
eggie (2024-01-31 16:53:39+00:00): Dag D2  Ik betwijfel of dit juist is.  Een naam alleen doet niets in OSM.
Misschien hoort de naam op de duiker?

MVG
eggie
D2Hydro (2024-02-01 08:54:28+00:00): Dag Eggie, 

Ik plaats het innamepunt liever niet op de duiker, omdat de inname echt op dit punt ligt. Ik had naast de naam ook de key operator: Dunea. Ik ga kijken of ik nog meer keys kan toevoegen zodat de data makkelijker te vinden is zoals: inlet *,zie : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:inlet. Mocht je nog suggesties hebben dan hoor ik het uiteraard graag!
eggie (2024-02-01 09:00:35+00:00): Hoi,
Nou dat lijkt me wel een goede tag die je gevonden hebt. 
Per slot van rekening zit de inlaat precies daar. 

Mapse,
eggie
Frans S (2024-01-31 17:22:09+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146911231
Mathias_ADAV (2024-04-02 14:03:20+00:00): 

Bonjour,

j'en étais persuadé mais après vérification sur place il n'y a aucune nouvelle piste cyclable, mais bien 2 bandes cyclables qui sont renseigné sur la rue de Valmy : highway = tertiay + cycleway = lane.

Voici la page wiki qui reprend toute les informations : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle

N'hésitez pas à m'écrire si besoin : carto@droitauvelo.org

Bon mapping !
Mathias
nurdafur (2024-03-21 11:08:13+00:00): Hallo Surrli
Du hast in diesem Changeset einen highway=path zu highway=footway geändert. Damit Wege korrekt gerendert werden können, ist es wichtig, dass gemeinsame Rad- und Fusswege als highway=path mit segregated=yes/no gezeichnet werden. 
Hier findest du mehr Infos:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath
Liebe Grüsse und weiterhin viel Spass beim Kartografieren 
Urs
Mathias_ADAV (2024-04-02 14:01:19+00:00): Bonjour,

j'en étais persuadé mais après vérification sur place il n'y a aucune nouvelle piste cyclable, mais bien 2 bandes cyclables qui sont renseigné sur la rue de Valmy : highway = tertiay + cycleway = lane. 

Voici la page wiki qui reprend toute les informations : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle

N'hésitez pas à m'écrire si besoin : carto@droitauvelo.org 

Bon mapping !
Mathias
SpinOff (2024-01-31 18:07:38+00:00): Hej. W OSM mapujemy tylko to co fizycznie istnieje. Z tego co widzę, budowa tej spalarni zakończy się dopiero w 2028 roku. Poniższy artykuł dotyczy tego obiektu?

https://www.portalsamorzadowy.pl/gospodarka-komunalna/tarnow-wybuduje-spalarnie-jest-zielone-swiatlo-dla-inwestycji,514766.html
ScottNelson (2024-02-15 06:37:19+00:00): This changeset made the Gold Mountain trail discontinuous near the recycling centre.  Was that on purpose.  Last year this short segment (a steep descent to the road) was groomed.
ScottNelson (2024-02-15 06:38:30+00:00): note I'm referring to way #904315953
Xvtn (2024-01-31 16:48:42+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes in this set. In this case, everything looks good except one critical issue: The way is tagged as a building. It seems like it should be tagged as an apartment complex rather than a building. Since it's already tagged as landuse=residential and residential=apartments, all that needs to happen here is to remove the building tag altogether.
Hope that makes sense. Thanks for your contributions, and welcome to OSM!
SpinOff (2024-01-31 17:58:59+00:00): Poprawiłem Twoją edycję.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146915248
SpinOff (2024-01-31 17:59:24+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146915248
Fraxi (2024-01-31 19:17:07+00:00): source: https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/images/b1/2f/ef/c6/7e01-4fde-a0d2-e5937122d023.jpg

https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/images/12/53/1f/63/b62e-44bf-9483-d7a381b60d13.jpg
woodpeck_repair (2024-06-15 22:29:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 152740214, 152740288, 152740274, 152740234, 152740192, 152740169, 152740167, 152740249, 152740178 where the changeset comment is: revert contributions by Hamilton 44/Delta Evas ALL, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16207
ivanbranco (2024-08-27 12:20:17+00:00): Hi Samuell,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17133820

what's the meaning of these tags?
place=sub
sour=mapa goggle
arcanma (2024-02-01 15:38:46+00:00): Corretto uso del terreno degli oliveti, foresta non è appropriato, è un frutteto (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=orchard)
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:42:19+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146912786
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 04:19:18+00:00): działający link: https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/polska-numeracja-dr%C3%B3g.964026/page-138#post-187136921

Czy te numery są wyraźnie oznakowane w terenie?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 04:22:44+00:00): Jak nie to można tagować, ale w unsigned_ref (w iD trzeba sobie rozwinąć tagi na dole chyba)


Tak jak pisałem:

Zachęcam do przedyskutowania tego na  https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/pl/40 (oficjalne forum OSMowe, logowanie kontem OSM), by nie było nieprzewidzianych trudności.

Warto też zerknąć na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:unsigned_ref (jak trasa nie ma numeru wyraźnie oznakowana w terenie to wsadzamy jej kod do znacznika unsigned_ref a nie ref).

Piszę tutaj bo miło jak ktoś chce pomóc w poprawie OSM, ale mapowanie kodów które są ledwo widoczne (jak np.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Barely_signed_road_reference_code.jpg ) w tagu ref to często powtarzający się błąd.
DxtR85 (2024-02-02 10:35:17+00:00): Nie ma tej numeracji nigdzie, zmiany zrobiłem przed przeczytaniem tamtego komentarza. Jeśli istnieje jakiś prosty sposób na wycofanie tych zmian to bym prosił, żeby to zrobić. Jak takiego sposobu nie ma, to zrobię to ręcznie. Na mapie UMP-pcPL widnieją numery dróg powiatowych, więc raczej cały plan spalił na panewce :(
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-02 12:30:53+00:00): była też prośba w https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/prosby-o-zmapowanie-poprawe/64939/2927

dodam że dodanie do unsigned_ref powinno być OK
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:42:36+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146912951
citrula (2024-01-31 19:14:06+00:00): On OSM we map what's on the ground, and to me it seems like this is not present at all today. If you want to map historical routes, I recommend checking out OpenHistoricalMap. They are working on a new map layer for rail which might be of interest to you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146913145
citrula (2024-02-02 19:39:48+00:00): I have removed this railway as it is not present at all.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146998494
seattlefyi (2024-02-01 01:26:44+00:00): Your buildings you drew look good! I went ahead and changed them to building=yes and removed the amenity=school. Also, personal information in changeset comments isn't necessary, but that's a personal privacy choice.
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:43:05+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146913320
aTarom (2024-01-31 17:44:58+00:00): Hi, can you review the removal of this element in Spain?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1241737678/history
Thanks for editing
gscholz (2024-03-10 07:55:03+00:00): Hi Harvesterify,
this changeset has created a lot of errors regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=2.40994&lat=48.62899&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146913383

These errors are caused by a bug in osm-relatify, related to splitting roundabouts (which is btw. disputable).

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:43:21+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146913414
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:43:37+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146913637
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:43:53+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146913796
seattlefyi (2024-02-01 01:15:29+00:00): Adding the coffee stand is useful -- does it have a name? Also, looks like an optional tag you could add on this one is also takeaway=only
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:44:16+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146913976
Eino81 (2024-03-01 10:24:50+00:00): Hi Piskvor, this residential street is not fully opened yet. I was there yesterday, only half of that is fine, the rest is still closed... I will update that.
Piskvor (2024-03-01 11:24:45+00:00): Great, thanks for the update:)
Glassman (2024-02-02 20:45:48+00:00): These features are usually tagged as landuse=basin + basin=detention. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dbasin

Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146914486
arjunaraoc (2024-02-02 10:29:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Update changes in  a smaller area  as a  separate changeset to facilitate review.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146915466
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-01 07:24:06+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146933760
Fizzie-DWG (2024-02-10 01:35:30+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15690
hyun_jun (2024-02-01 05:27:46+00:00): hello. why delete the address?
VLD175 (2024-02-01 21:27:57+00:00): Hello hyun_jun,

Thank you for reaching out. We were working on a mapping project and we saw several instances of identical addresses on separate buildings. These were detected as “Duplicate house numbers” in the JOSM validator. My apologies for any inconvenience caused by the removal of these house numbers from the map.
Xvtn (2024-02-06 15:38:18+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything looks good to me, no complaints! Thanks for your contributions!
woodpeck (2024-02-01 00:49:27+00:00): Hello Lex legis, please specify a source for change of the name "Acquarenaparkplatz" to "Acquarenaparkplatz - Parcheggio Acquarena". I have the suspicion that you are simply translating the name, which would not be acceptable in OSM. You need to demonstrate that the name is actually signed or used like that. The same holds true for your other additions of Italian names like e.g. the change of "Solebecken" to "Solebecken - Piscina di acqua salata". I repeat, it is not sufficient to assume that just because street names follow the convention "German name - Italian name" in this region that every POI (and even individual installations of a spa compound) follow the same nomenclature.
Lex legis (2024-02-01 08:31:44+00:00): Dear Woodpeck. Next time I will specify the sources for each of my posts (my bad, sorry), but it will become heavy in a region of Italy, not Austria, where the official language is Italian with same value, by the law, of German. 
The region is bilingual (trilingual in a part of it) and is mandatory to use both of the languages; so you assumed wrong. Law is law. And the owners of the complex respected completely as you can see in the sources I report after.
No one reported the German sources by the way; what I see German denomination are always kept as correct by default, why? Because local residents, mostly German speakers, are entitled to avoid the law? Anyway the sources (all https://www.acquarena.com): for "parcheggio" here: https://www.acquarena.com/it/come-raggiungerci/index.html; for the pool denominations I found the ones present here: https://www.acquarena.com/it/pools/
I used "Solebecken - Piscina di acqua salata" and not "Solebecken - Vasca salina", because "Vasca salina" in Italian sounds funny.
Have a nice day
Joseph R P (2024-02-14 18:43:12+00:00): Hello, highway=residential is not strictly for residential areas, but going off OSM Wiki guidelines, these do serve apartment complexes throughout this neighborhood. Alternatively, they could be tagged as highway=unclassified, which a more broad tag, but there is no difference in rendering or routing between the two tags. highway=service should not be used to tag these roads, however. Service roads with standard tags on OSM, at least in the US, are typically used for small unnamed roads which can serve a variety of areas and amenities like parking lots, rest areas, industrial areas, and so on. Roads like Copley Place and Crown Park Avenue are more akin to typical neighborhood streets rather than a road you would find in somewhere like a strip mall.
OMNIBUS (2024-03-07 20:45:54+00:00): Hi, thank you for your interest in mapping this area. You erased some objetcts here. Could you tell us how did you improved the area? Are you based in Colombia? Are you part of a team? Which one?
Marek-M (2024-02-01 10:54:51+00:00): Cześć, na liniach highway nie ma potrzeby dodawać tak gęsto węzłów, bo nie są one do wyznaczania krawężników. W tej edycji pewnie kilkaset węzłów można spokojnie pominąć i sens dróg zostanie zachowany.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#Zachowaj_proste_linie_prosto

https://i.imgur.com/koEqVfc.png
Szymson (2024-02-01 11:59:08+00:00): Nie rozumiem tej manii upraszczania. Chyba chodzi o to by jak najdokładniej odzwierciedlić rzeczywistość na mapie, prawda? Jeżeli istnieją tam łuki o promieniu rzędu 500-550m to muszą być jakieś węzły pośrednie.
Marek-M (2024-02-01 13:07:09+00:00): Nie do końca jest to prawda. Oczywiście, że odzwierciedlamy rzeczywistość ale pewne fragmenty linii, które są niemal proste nie potrzebują węzła co 3 metry. Każdy taki węzeł później musi być przeliczany w routingach spowalniając wyliczanie trasy.

Odwzorowania krawężników można tworzyć innymi obiektami niż highway=* np. barrier=*, area:highway=*, landuse=*

Linie highway=* mają za zadanie oddać symbolicznie kształt drogi dla potrzeb routingu.
Marek-M (2024-02-01 13:13:13+00:00): Dla przykładu ten węzeł https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11573972976 dodałeś w odległości 38cm od węzła https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11573941141

Później drobna edycja drogi staje się koszmarem, bo każdy taki węzełek trzeba dodatkowo edytować a niczego one nie wnoszą dobrego dla mapy.
emersonveenstra (2024-02-01 12:45:38+00:00): Hi there,

You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1245022303 with no tags, could you please go back and tag it? Thanks!
amacmcgrann (2024-02-16 03:25:41+00:00): Done.
limes11 (2024-02-18 17:14:27+00:00): Hi

wenn der Weg mit VZ 240 ausgestattet ist, dann ist es im osm-Sinne keine richtige Straße, sondern ein hw=path. hw=pedestrian ergibt keinen Sinn, das beschreibt eine Fußgängerzone. Ich habe das wieder geändert. 

Viele Grüße
Glassman (2024-02-02 19:50:44+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146916936
lawrencebanks (2024-02-05 10:00:28+00:00): The main name of buildings in Romania is in Romanian - English is a secondary naming tag
Sk!d (2024-02-01 00:01:39+00:00): Hey Ursus-Breizh, das gebäude gibt es doch weiterhin oder? In solchen fällen bitte nicht die ganzen Wegpunkte löschen sondern nur die Informationen korregieren die falsch sind.
Ursus-Breizh (2024-02-01 15:25:22+00:00): Hallo, vielen Dank für diesen wichtigen Hinweis. Ich habe bisher noch nicht viele Änderungen vorgenommen und bitte um Entschuldigung für diesen Fehler; das Gebäude gibt es weiterhin. Diesen Fehler habe ich wohl mehrmals gemacht, sorry.
Sk!d (2024-02-02 01:31:57+00:00): Kein Problem ich hab die Fehlerhaften Bearbeitungen wieder zurück gesetzt.

Mach gerne weiter das brauch etwas Übung um genau zu verstehen welche Änderungen man im dem Editor speichert.
Ursus-Breizh (2024-02-03 14:29:42+00:00): Danke, werde mich bemühen.
daganzdaanda (2024-03-07 21:50:08+00:00): Zur Info: 
Ich hab die Tags vom alten Gebäude entfernt. Am neuen Standort habe ich einen Punkt genommen, statt dem ganzen Gebäude (dort sind ja verschiedene Sachen drin). Die aktuelle Website und Kontakt-Telefon hab ich auch noch angegeben.
Siehe:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148361357