piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-08 19:10:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10722032582

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Glassman (2023-03-09 00:49:17+00:00): Why did you add access=no and service=driveway to Coons Road? As well as change the existing unname service road into a driveway? I live in this area and neither are correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133452570
marczoutendijk (2023-03-09 09:37:59+00:00): The DWG ticket for this change contained this message:
"Coons Road, off SR-9, Sedro Woolley, WA, is a private drive way. It is
NOT a public road.  There are Jersey blocks at the intersection of the
tee blocking off the north portion, which serves several houses.  Both
southern legs are 100% on private property and serve two property
owners.  There is no public access."

I have asked the writer of that message to reply here (or privately) within 48 hours.

In the meantime I have changed the access to private and restored the service road.  

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Glassman (2023-03-09 17:35:02+00:00): I'm seeing mappers delete driveways or mark them private when they have no markings or gates. The accepted practice in the US is that driveways are private but should only be tagged with access=private if they are marked or have a gate.

Looking at street level imagery also doesn't show any signs indicating that coons road should be marked as private.

additionally there are power lines that can be accessed via coons road.
marczoutendijk (2023-03-09 19:44:10+00:00): Received comment:
"Commenter is simply incorrect about signs.  I just looked at Google street view.  Signs indicating private property start at the large stump on the right hand side of the driveway just out of sight from the Google street view..  There are MULTIPLE signs at that location and continuing up the road about the road being private.  The road is not gated.  Writer is correct that this can provide access to the power lines.  However, the portion that turns south and leaves the power line right of way serves no purpose for public access."
marczoutendijk (2023-03-18 20:11:46+00:00): Hi Glassman,
Do you have any more comments on the reaction quoted above?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Glassman (2023-03-18 20:25:34+00:00): I haven't had a chance to drive up there to see what is currently posted although I do plan to head up there.  

Private to me means that it is privately maintained. If the road is posted as no trespassing or something similar then I agree that it should be access=private.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:01:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
aTarom (2023-03-08 19:45:57+00:00): Hi, Đuro Jiří
is
"Kat"="0"
"level"="0"?
at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10722043365/history
cheers
Đuro Jiří (2023-03-09 07:39:04+00:00): Corretto, grazie
Uralla (2023-03-10 07:38:54+00:00): А есть где-либо табличка с таким же названием? Очень странное название дороги.
south ural (2023-03-10 08:15:13+00:00): Нет таблички. Есть только перечень дорог необщего пользования Трёхгорного ГО, но он для широких глаз не доступен.
Uralla (2023-03-10 08:21:15+00:00): А вопрос по дороге общего пользования.
south ural (2023-03-10 08:50:26+00:00): Эти дороги к дорогам общего пользования не относятся. На них висит знак «Движение запрещено» (белый круг в красной кайме), в перечне региональных дорог общего пользования Челябинской области  их тоже нет.
Uralla (2023-03-10 08:57:10+00:00): А ты там был, фото знака есть?
south ural (2023-03-10 10:52:57+00:00): Судя по твоему вопросу, ты не в одном ЗАТО не был. На всех подъездах к ЗАТО Росатома висят такие знаки. Съезди посмотри и сфотографируй, а я посмотрю, что после фото с тобой и твоим фотоаппаратом Росгвардия или Атомохрана сделает
Uralla (2023-03-10 11:17:31+00:00): а тебя не смущает, что в пределах твоих секретных дорог находится ГК Завьялиха и каких-либо препятствий проезда к нему нет?
south ural (2023-03-11 16:32:02+00:00): 1. Это не секретные дороги, а автомобильные дороги необщего пользования. Как правило, к ним относятся автомобильные дороги на территории ЗАТО, в т. ч. не входящие в состав режимной территории.
Elchen (2023-03-08 19:47:35+00:00): also added fire hydrants
eggie (2023-03-08 21:22:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2023-03-11 14:55:10+00:00): review:
Het toevoegen van lane_markings=no is voor NL tamelijk zinloos.
Dat is voor verre landen waar wegen met een breedte van 6 of 8 rijbanen geen rijbaanscheidingen hebben :-)
eggie (2023-03-08 21:25:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
I merged the info with tje present addressnode.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Diacritic (2023-03-14 06:10:22+00:00): Hi VLD,

Was going through recent changes in the area and saw this. What is your reasoning behind reverting this change as vandalism?

Dian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133455124
Mattheezus (2023-03-14 15:56:03+00:00): Hello Diacritic,

Thank you for reaching out to me on this matter. I apologize for the incorrect edit on the feature, I made an error in assessing the naming of the feature and have since done further research to better my understanding of this location. I thank you again for reaching out to me, and apologize again. Please feel free to reach out again if you have any further comments or questions, thank you!
Diacritic (2023-03-15 00:43:51+00:00): No problem at all. For what it is worth, as a native Australian English speaker, I haven't heard "Dookie" used in the same way as it appears to be used in American English.
Truchin (2023-03-12 14:30:59+00:00): Bonjour Gaëtan,

Pour info, le wiki précise bien "Un jardin seul doit être indiqué par un node nœud unique ou une area zone. Les zones ne doivent pas inclure des éléments (par exemple des maisons d'habitation) qui ne font pas partie du jardin lui-même."
Tu as donc tagué ce qui correspond plutôt à du landuse=residential (déjà présent) plutôt que du leisure=garden qui doit être beaucoup plus fin. 

Bonne continuation

Thomas
Baloo Uriza (2023-03-09 14:26:43+00:00): Landuse polygons generally shouldn't attach to road centerlines.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133455199
ika-chan! (2023-03-08 20:54:54+00:00): Accidentally hit the "C" key while working on it.
AlexRiabtsev (2023-03-08 22:20:19+00:00): дуже бажано робити коментарі до змін осмисленими, а не шаблонними
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%B7%D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD
avinet_ua (2023-03-09 14:04:10+00:00): привіт

я знаю, просто маленьке виправлення назви, за завичкою вже комент пишу
Langlaeufer (2023-03-09 08:56:41+00:00): Hallo ubrede,
Bzgl. Möhlenhalenbecker Straße
Ich hab mal die Straßentypen angepasst. Eine Verbindungsstraße sehe ich hier nicht - da der Weg öffentlich ist, sehe ich auch keinen Feldweg. Ich hab daher mal Zufahrtsweg (Service) gewählt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133455818
mueschel (2023-03-17 18:09:55+00:00): Hi,
you added 'LMI' and "RAN' tags. These are not used in other places. 
Reference numbers are usually tagged with a 'ref' tag, e.g. ref:LMI or ref:RAN.  Could you change it to this common scheme?
Adrian_N (2023-03-18 15:11:31+00:00): Sure, I checked the wiki for the ref tag. Should I do ref:RO:LMI/ref:ro:LMI since it's only for Romania or just ref:LMI? Also it seems there's also a nat_ref for some reason, what's up with that?
mueschel (2023-03-18 15:43:18+00:00): 'nat_ref' can be used if there is *the* reference number of an object (like the ref of a street). For more special numbers, ref:XY should be used. 

Using ref:RO:LMI might be a good idea, but is not required. 'RO' should be in capital letters as it is a country code.

Taginfo says that there are already a couple ref:lmi, but no ref:ran.

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/ref%253Almi

So, I would use the same 'ref:lmi' here, and for ref:ran / ref:RO:ran / ref:RAN / ref:ran no one decided yet what to use.
Dimitar155 (2023-03-08 21:12:26+00:00): Решението е №112.
luin132 (2023-03-08 21:30:39+00:00): Source:Maxar Premium Imagery;Esri World Imagery (Clarity)
eggie (2023-03-09 07:26:04+00:00): Dag fcus...  Dit is vast geen openbaar zwembad. Ik heb access private toegevoegd.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=swimming_pool


MVG
eggie
Baloo Uriza (2023-03-09 13:56:19+00:00): Where are you getting the idea that this multiuse path is 1) complete and 2) now a freeway onramp?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133456573
baumansamsara (2023-03-09 15:03:42+00:00): I work for a Vehicle telematics company called Samsara. One of my clients has a large fleet based in Tulsa and has 10-15 vehicles a day that uses this off-ramp. This is not a multi-use path.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133456573
Baloo Uriza (2023-03-09 17:50:14+00:00): OK, I'm not *exactly* sure what happened, but what you changed the tagging on was very definitely a path and not an offramp, as offramps aren't usually 3 km long and 4m wide with 2m radius turns.
baumansamsara (2023-03-09 18:35:43+00:00): My apologies Baloo, I am definitely new to this program. All I know is that this road is actively being used and all of the vehicles I've seen using it have been headed southbound. I could be wrong in calling it an offramp, but that is definitely why I wanted it to be validated by an expert like yourself.
Baloo Uriza (2023-03-09 23:05:04+00:00): OK, the southbound lanes of the freeway are just east and appear to already be tagged as open.
OneC (2023-03-23 14:57:11+00:00): hello TAYbalt - I have updated New Bold Square back to access=yes; the use of access=private should only be used where the general public is not permitted without prior authorization. An apartment/condo complex is a publicly accessible venue. The most restrictive that a site such as this should be access=permissive or maybe access=customer.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
luin132 (2023-03-08 23:00:07+00:00): Source: Maxar Premium Imagery;Esri World Imagery (Clarity)
Hufkratzer (2023-03-09 00:39:14+00:00): Hi,
You have tagged
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152779883
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152779904
leisure=horse_riding (riding centre),
but these areas look more like simple riding arenas (leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian).
Compare
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149708347
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149676470
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
portishead_runner (2023-03-09 07:42:14+00:00): Thanks. Very helpful. Will change that and a couple of others of similar nature in my area
user_5359 (2023-03-10 07:45:16+00:00): Welcome To OSM! Please add more information about the hotel (also the german name).  Ist the InterContinental Hotel Düsseldorf in the same building?
jb54osm (2023-03-08 22:56:45+00:00): Dag fcus19,

Bedankt voor je bijdrage. Een aandachtspunt: in Nederland zetten we de POI (in dit geval de tandarts, maar kan ook een winkel o.i.d. zijn) op de adresnode. En gebruiken we zoveel mogelijk de naam die het bedrijf zelf voert. Ik heb e.e.a. voor je aangepast. Neem even kijkje.
Veel succes bij OSM verder.
eggie (2023-03-09 07:30:36+00:00): Dag fcus...  Aanvulling.
Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus...  Je verplaatst dan al snel (adres)nodes zonder dat je het in de gaten hebt.
Medemapper jb heeft het al hersteld zie ik.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133456870

MVG
eggie
jb54osm (2023-03-10 15:32:35+00:00): In case you are foreign (en-GB locale), an English translation:

Hello fcus19,

Thank you for your contribution. A point of attention: in the Netherlands we put the POI (in this case the dentist, but it can also be a shop or something like that) on the address node. And we use the name of the company itself as much as possible. I've adjusted it for you. Take a look.
[Please check your other contributions].
Good luck with OSM further.
fcus19 (2023-03-10 19:20:26+00:00): Bedankt voor de feedback Eggie en jb54osm; ik zal er bij verdere edits rekening mee houden
hfs (2023-04-01 22:47:37+00:00): Hi codingjoe,

sind die Hausnummern hier wirklich „19 HH1“ und „19 HH2”? Stehen die so an den Häusern dran oder werden so in den Postadressen verwendet?

Das Format der Hausnummer wäre nämlich einzigartig in Potsdam.
codingjoe (2023-04-02 08:26:51+00:00): Hi, guter Punkt. Ich hätte den hier "entrances" Festlegen sollen. Laut Kataster ist das alles Lenne 19. Telekom und Co. haben den Hinterhäusern dieses Suffix gegeben. Dran steht an den Häusern natürlich gar nichts. Ich werde den Fehler beheben. Danke für den Hinweis! LG Johannes
hfs (2023-04-04 19:34:44+00:00): Danke Dir!
emersonveenstra (2023-03-09 11:58:32+00:00): Hi,

Several things wrong with this changeset:

1. The highway type is incorrect, this is not part of the public road network, so the cul-de-sac should be residential and the driveways should be highway=service and service=driveway

2. The driveways and street names are not called "cul-de-sac", so they should not have that in their name. The driveways should be unnamed, and the cul-de-sac should be named the same as the road it connects to

3. You forgot to remove the turning_circle node here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2303131788
ZLima12 (2025-10-21 19:26:29+00:00): Hello,

Currently, it is standard to have the ref on both the way and the relation. Not all data consumers honor the relation (notably openstreetmap-carto), so please don't remove refs from roads for this reason. There is a section that talks about this on the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref#Examples_on_ways
eggie (2023-03-09 06:39:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
r5d (2023-03-09 21:21:39+00:00): Dank!
Joseph R P (2023-03-23 05:24:18+00:00): Hello, the initial configuration of these roads was correct as State Route 844 officially terminates at Gate 15A: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_State_Route_844, https://web.archive.org/web/20131020052201/http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/Planning/TechServ/TIM/Documents/CountyMaps_ColorOn/GRE_color.pdf
nickvet419 (2023-03-25 00:28:36+00:00): Roads are able to change type and also keep the designation and name. it transitions from a separated highway to a connector road that leads to and from the base.  For example, someone coming off of Ogden is not entering a highway or someone coming off base is not entering the highway while taking A road to SR444.
Joseph R P (2023-03-29 00:44:30+00:00): The whole of SR 844 is technically a freeway, and toll plazas/entrance gates are usually included as part of the freeway for consistency. Even if you're coming off or going onto the road for just 100 feet, it's still part of the gate approach along the freeway.

But on another note related to this changeset - where does the name 'A Road' come from for the roadway between SR 844 S and SR 444? Maps that I've searched up indicate that the name of this road is actually called Davis-Monthan Road (though it appears that it isn't signed with any name and appears more as a highway ramp, so it can't be confirmed 100% if this is the real name of it). Was this name sourced from Google Maps?
nickvet419 (2023-03-29 17:27:10+00:00): A road and B road were both gate access roads before the grade separated freeway was installed. It is not signed and now one-way in the opposite direction but you can still find the name in the tiger data and official maps.  Ogden Ave is originally C road but was dedicated Ogden Ave. Technically has 2 names still used on base documentation.  You should check out USGS official maps for public info. https://apps.nationalmap.gov/viewer/
luin132 (2023-03-08 23:00:18+00:00): Source: Maxar Premium Imagery;Esri World Imagery (Clarity)
luin132 (2023-03-08 23:00:24+00:00): Source: Maxar Premium Imagery;Esri World Imagery (Clarity)
luin132 (2023-03-08 23:00:32+00:00): Source: Maxar Premium Imagery;Esri World Imagery (Clarity)
luin132 (2023-03-08 23:00:40+00:00): Source: Maxar Premium Imagery;Esri World Imagery (Clarity)
luin132 (2023-03-08 23:00:44+00:00): Source: Maxar Premium Imagery;Esri World Imagery (Clarity)
ElliottPlack (2023-03-11 00:51:55+00:00): Hi there,

Why is the fairway grass overlapping the green here? That is not how fairways work. What you're doing falls into the category of a common mapping pitfall for golf courses. Please review https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls and adjust these fairways accordingly.

Thanks!

-- Elliott, OSMF Data Working Group
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-08 23:10:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2188858247
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429774109

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-23 17:11:16+00:00): note that explicitly marking that motorway has no cycleways is not very useful, except narrow cases in areas where motorways sometimes has cycleway lanes
luin132 (2023-03-08 23:47:14+00:00): Source: Maxar Premium Imagery;Esri World Imagery (Clarity)
luin132 (2023-03-08 23:47:00+00:00): Source: Maxar Premium Imagery;Esri World Imagery (Clarity)
Baloo Uriza (2023-03-09 13:50:04+00:00): name should only be the name.  Just deleting the name tag works if it's just some random house.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133459316
jmarchon (2023-03-09 01:54:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133459420
Koreller (2023-05-23 12:45:55+00:00): Hello, I would like to thank you for your building additions along Ryomyong Street, as the outlines of your buildings are of very good quality!
muchichka_s (2023-03-10 07:08:32+00:00): Ти впевнений, що ця назва є правильною?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1129595648/history
sdvm (2023-03-10 15:22:35+00:00): Так, це правильна назва магазину
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-09 14:20:13+00:00): DO NOT CHANGE ROADWAYS TO CARTPATHS!  If they are already correctly mapped as a roadway, changing it to a cartpath for a renderer is not permitted.
luin132 (2023-03-09 00:42:58+00:00): Source: Maxar Premium Imagery;Esri World Imagery (Clarity)
JeroenvanderGun (2023-05-18 14:28:02+00:00): Hi,

I reverted this change. The area described by this boundary relation is no longer a country since 1986 and that country no longer exists at all since 2010.
Frans S (2023-03-11 18:19:41+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However, most of the rectangular buildings you mapped are not well squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133460818
MxxCon (2023-03-10 03:03:10+00:00): Hello.
Please pay attention not to accidentally drag features when you are panning the map around. In this case you dragged a hotel node 2 blocks over..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133461016
Supaplex (2023-05-06 11:36:25+00:00): 為何移除Wikidata連結？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133461567
BilibiliDaqiboQi (2023-05-08 23:20:09+00:00): wiki的翻译不准确等很可能会导致误解
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133461567
Frans S (2023-03-20 14:48:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
When a building is surrounded by a wall, please just map the building. Not the yard.
Best regards
emersonveenstra (2023-03-09 12:01:02+00:00): Hi,

Adding "nonpublic" as the name won't fix your problem. If it truly is not open to the public, you need to change the access tags to private. Would you mind removing the name and changing the access tags on this and the other two paths? Thanks!
JJIglesias (2023-03-09 06:30:16+00:00): Saludos, la Calle Potosi, y su paralela  al Este,SIN NOMBRE estan puestas como calles de 1 solo sentido (De Norte a Sur) esto es MUY INUSUAL en una poblacion tan pequeña como Entre Rios. Por favor podrias verificar el sentido de circulacion de ambas vias (Potosi e Innombrada)?
Saludos y Gracias
JJ
SekeRob (2023-03-09 05:00:05+00:00): PS from space the name on traffic island is Piazza del Pazienza, not Andrea
JJIglesias (2023-03-09 05:54:22+00:00): Saludos. 
La Etiqueta "Operador" NO existe en la base de datos de OSM, por  lo cual es invalida. 
Si se requiere usar la etiqueta "Operator" debe ser usada dentro de este contexto:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:operator

Las cuadras/manzanos o city_blocks son formas de distribucion urbanistica pero NO son Operadas por las Alcaldias, pues usualmente corresponden a terrenos de propiedad privada no terrenos de propiedad Municipal. Parques, Areas Verdes, y otras Facilidades SI son "operadas" por las Alcaldias.

Favor corregir todos esos errores incluidos en este y otros Changesets

Gracias y Saludos
JJ
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
user_11609320 (2023-03-09 05:36:25+00:00): looking at online reviews, there hasn't been a ihop for years, was replaced by bun boy but was torn down
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].