piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Famlam (2025-03-30 22:12:18+00:00): Het lijkt mij eerder dat livenav een update moet krijgen. emergency=yes is identiek aan het verouderde access=emergency en overschrijft access=private.
Echter, access=private laat ook privévoertuigen door, dat ontbreekt nu. De navigatie is nu gebroken
PikaMap (2026-04-01 13:44:31+00:00): Bonjour,
Pouriez-vous arrêter de modifier ce POI le magasin Julien Dorcel est ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11809681829 est pas dans le square Pierre PERRET.
Bonne journée
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-04-01 13:56:05+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de votre alerte, nous avons fait les changements nécessaires
PikaMap (2026-04-01 13:58:40+00:00): Merci à vous :)
eggie (2025-02-24 09:16:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Tip   Is het wellicht een amenity=social_facility ipv een winkel? 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_facility
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-02-24 11:09:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM. You created the restaurants without a name  in the middle of the street. I think it's better to remove your contribution.
Greetz,
eggie
nevw (2025-02-24 11:55:54+00:00): We don’t have gas stations in Australia.
Should this be shop=fuel instead?
Vinber-Pro (2025-02-24 11:23:55+00:00): bonjour,
merci pour ces contributions !

je ne comprends pas ce que veut dire un bâtiment appelé jean-paul.

Bonne cartographie Vincent
Mbolatiana Victoire (2025-05-27 11:45:24+00:00): Bonjour Vincent,
Merci pour votre message.
Le bâtiment nommé "Jean Paul" est en fait une épicerie portant ce nom. C'est un commerce connu localement sous cette appellation.
 
Bonne cartographie à vous aussi,
Mbolatiana Victoire
Vinber-Pro (2025-05-27 13:00:11+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour ton retour !

effectivement avec l'ajout de l'attribut que tu as fait, cela précise.

je me demande si tout le batiment est utilisé par l"épicerie ou seulement une partie, en bas et le reste est du logement par exemple ?

pourquoi cette question :) car si c'est le cas, alors il est préférable de créer un noeud (node) dans le bâtiment et d'y associer les attributs de l'épicerie.

si tu as un doute demande à https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nirilanto%20Joela :D
mavl (2025-05-13 15:06:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mavl (2025-05-13 15:04:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 166207855, 166207980, 166207904, 166207831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, road removal - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17614].
mateo_lmwn (2025-03-28 04:06:28+00:00): why ? set access = no? why? tell me?
silversurfer83 (2025-02-24 20:11:31+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

danke, dass du hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten.

Eine Frage: Wer darf denn hier sein Fahrrad "tanken"?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162882634
Steube (2026-07-30 14:50:13+00:00): Vermutlich ist das Passieren für Fußgänger und Radfahrer am barrier=lift_gate zwischen Töttelstedt und Grundmühle möglich. Diverse Router leiten jedoch selbst diese nicht hier entlang, da keine access-Werte vorhanden sind. Wie verhält es sich vor Ort tatsächlich?
Fraxi (2025-02-24 11:08:30+00:00): Извинете! Неволно ли сте премахнал пешеходната пътека и малките неравности? Имам предвид https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6297428635 и https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11694607799. Снимка от Bing Streetside, макар и от 2021 г., показва, че там има пешеходна пътека: https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=42.697934%7E23.346847&lvl=19.0&pi=-29.4&style=x&dir=333.3
Fizzie-DWG (2025-06-04 01:21:00+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167156814
NeisBot (2025-02-24 17:01:05+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 11:04:27+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163565035
kuhni74 (2025-02-24 10:08:58+00:00): merci!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2025-03-02 20:32:20+00:00): مرحبا بك في خريطة الشارع المفتوحة، نرجوا منكم عدم إدخال بيانات شخصية للخريطة وشكرا لكم
Tomas Straupis (2025-02-24 10:42:43+00:00): Žinoma taisytina - pataisiau.
NeisBot (2025-02-24 17:02:19+00:00): Hi lephotographe0769, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear, difficult to understand, or consistently repetitive.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
NeisBot (2025-02-24 17:01:06+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
Digi-Solutions (2025-02-24 18:11:20+00:00): Hello,

Map edits were intentional, the company Digi-Solutions is established at this location and offers the services described above.

Thanks
pitscheplatsch (2025-02-25 09:51:16+00:00): Thank you for your prompt response and for clarifying that the location is for a legitimate business. I appreciate your contribution to the map!

The reason why your changeset was flagged is that the description used is quite detailed and reads similarly to promotional content, which can sometimes be interpreted as SEO-related.

To keep OSM useful and neutral, it’s best to provide concise and factual descriptions without promotional language. A simpler version would be more suitable and help avoid any misunderstandings.

Thanks once again for your understanding and for helping to keep the map accurate and useful!
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 11:07:11+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163565119
Baloo Uriza (2025-02-25 21:35:26+00:00): We use "West" and "Street" instead, because computers are good at creating abbreviations when needed but doesn't know "Street" from "Saint" from "Sainte".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162885123
Sanniu (2025-02-26 08:37:29+00:00): Hi, newly added roads cross https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1362565293 and others, but they are no connected, can you either connect them or remove old non-existent roads?
eggie (2025-02-24 12:46:03+00:00): Dag Maurice  Je hebt de tag building= yes verwijderd en er landuse van gemaakt. Dat lijkt me niet de bedoeling.
In OSM Nederland hebben we al adresnodes Daar kun je bedrijven op bijtaggen.
Dus geen adres- en bedrijfsgegevens op de building_shape.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-02-24 12:47:57+00:00): Tagging gebouw hersteld. 
Adres verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
NLBRT (2025-03-12 08:29:59+00:00): Hi Om! Just curious, what was your source of information for figuring out if the stretch of road was done being constructed?
ompatekar (2025-07-30 06:32:38+00:00): Hi NLBRT,
  Thanks for your message. I was using a secondary source to determine the status of the road construction. I’ll make sure to verify more carefully next time. Appreciate your suggestion and efforts.
NeisBot (2025-02-24 17:01:07+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 11:12:52+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163565330
eggie (2025-02-24 11:13:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Het is hier volkomen onduidelijk of je wel of niet mag fietsen.
Waarom heb je dan nu toegevoegd bicycle=no als je zelf aangeeft :  bord bij ingang geeft aan vrij fietsen toegestaan ?

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-02-24 11:26:27+00:00): Er wordt hier in werkelijkheid volop ge mtbiked. 
Ik tag dan meestal in het voordeel van de fietser bij inconsistente bebording.
MartReiling (2025-02-24 11:41:09+00:00): Ik zie dat ik de tag fout heb aangeklikt, had bicycle=yes moeten zijn. Ik pas hem aan.
eggie (2025-02-24 11:46:53+00:00): Top!
MartReiling (2025-02-24 11:51:36+00:00): Overigens, het hek stond wel op slot. Er is overheen te stappen/klimmen, en/maar ik weet niet of hij standaard op slot zit of incidenteel.
eggie (2025-02-24 11:56:21+00:00): Oke, maar hier zijn nergens hekken... Wel dacht ik van die lage boomafsluitingen.
De hekken langs het valleikanaal kun je gewoon langs lopen via een opening.
Denk dat de hekken wel op slot zitten daar.
eggie (2025-02-24 12:01:50+00:00): Ahh.. Je bedoelt het pad dat parallel aan deA12 loopt?
Dat eindigt met een stepover (barrier=stile)
Dat lijkt me dan niet geschikt om te fietsen.
Die stepover moet je de fiets overheen tillen. 
Ik denk niet dat het de bedoeling is dat je er fietst.
MartReiling (2025-02-24 12:12:25+00:00): Wacht; ik zie nu pas dat we twee dingen verschillende paden in een bespreken. De Groeperkade (staatsbosbeheer) heeft (als je op groeperweg staat) beide kanten op borden staan met 'vrij wandelen', fietsen alleen op aangegeven routes (en er is nergens uit op te maken dat het een fietspad oid is). Die heeft inderdaad geen hekken. 
Het pad over de Grebbelinie parrallel aan de snelweg (1009157174) heeft een bord 'vrij wandelen en fietsen', geen uitzondering voor fiets in kleine letters eronder. Maar wel een hek, waar je overheen zou moeten klimmen als die dicht is.
flohoff (2025-02-24 14:54:43+00:00): Moin,
ich habe hier gerade den changeset gesehen - der hat zu einer ROutingänderung geführt:

Rot - Alt - Grün Neu.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=661053,990870

Dann hab ich mir die tags angesehen.

Sollte das nicht zu highway=construction + construction=secondary werden?

Das access=no/construction=yes führt dazu das man es nicht in der Karte sieht.

Ich habe auch noch einen Note aufgemacht das es ganz deutlich wird was hier gerade los ist:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4640181

Flo
eggie (2025-02-24 11:23:32+00:00): Mooi... Het stond hier overigens niet op slot voor fietsers.
Voor de duidelijkheid taggen we vaak foot en bicycle=yes
permissive wordt gebruikt als je op Eigen terrein toch mag fietsen.
Aan de hekken heb ik ook foot en bicycle=yes toegevoegd.
In werkelijkheid loopt het paadje langs de zijkant van het hek. 
Ik heb motor_vehicle=no toegevoegd aan de track. 

MVG
eggie
MartReiling (2025-02-24 11:39:41+00:00): Super. Ik denk (maar weet het niet zeker) dat het eigendom van het Waterschap is (hek van waterschap), dus niet helemaal 'eigen terrein' maar wel soort van ;). Ik verander hem naar bicycle=yes
Brummelwuff (2025-02-24 20:17:17+00:00): Moin, wieso hast du den Namen vom Karstadt geändert? Die Schilder wurden nicht verändert, dort hängen weiterhin die alten Karstadtschilder...
chris66 (2025-02-24 20:45:47+00:00): Hi, siehe : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4638187
Brummelwuff (2025-02-24 21:50:05+00:00): Du schreibst doch selber das immer noch Karstadt dran steht... für die änderung des "corporate design" gibts doch brand=*
chris66 (2025-02-24 22:07:29+00:00): Wenn Du damit nicht leben kannst darfst Du es gerne wieder ändern, aber wie gesagt: innen ist von Karstadt nix mehr zu sehen, nur noch Galeria. 
:-)
Brummelwuff (2025-02-25 07:22:10+00:00): Erledigt https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162919375
jasaijazah (2025-06-22 19:32:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jasaijazah
NeisBot (2025-02-24 17:01:08+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 11:11:49+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163565291
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-03-23 10:16:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163979213 where the changeset comment is: Following on from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163963906 , and see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/about-mapping-features-with-computer-vision/127790 - reverting some 'AI detected swimming pools', some of dubious quality.
chris66 (2025-09-09 09:49:40+00:00): Mobilitätslinie:

Ist der Planfeststellungsbeschluss bereits erfolgt?

Oder ist es nur ne grobe Planung? In dem Fall sollte die Linie aus OSM entfernt werden..
s777n (2025-02-25 16:30:09+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста не создавайте вымышленные кафе. Удалено
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-13 11:11:20+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/162934009
Marek-M (2025-02-24 12:41:03+00:00): Cześć, zamiast usuwania warto zostawić takie punkty z oznaczeniem disused: - dzięki temu zachowana zostanie historia miejsca, gdy tam otworzy się jakaś nowa usługa.
martianfreeloader (2025-09-09 11:44:29+00:00): Wow, this is a HUGE changeset! (We try to keep them much smaller whenever possible).

Are you sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49782685 is called "Wurzenpass" on the Slovene side?
JJIglesias (2025-02-24 15:22:48+00:00): Slds. Podrias aclarar a que "Errores" del mapa te refieres? 

Una cosa es que complementes datos de informacion faltante en el Mapa, y otra cosa es que hables de "Errores", porque si es por errores NO has corregido NINGUNO.

Las palabras son importantes, y no puedes caracterizar como Errores informacion de caracteristicas faltantes en el mapa.

Gracias
eggie (2025-02-24 11:33:53+00:00): Dag Dirco   De landuse heb ik wat aangepast en losgemaakt van de paden.

MVG
eggie
DrayPrescot (2025-02-26 09:51:10+00:00): Hi @andyblueg, is the removal of the ‘highway=footway’ an official openstreetmap new rule for buildings? As far as I know, the rules on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Guidelines_for_pedestrian_navigation should be used for pedestrian navigation, for this the ‘highway=footway’ to the building must be used.
I would ask you to revert your changes. Best regards, DP
andyblueg (2025-02-26 10:47:00+00:00): Hi DrayPrescot,

Thank you for pointing to the guidline for pedestrian navigation. My reading of the guidline is that "pedestrian navigation is particularly useful in complex areas". My understanding is that  this is not the case for a short path (5-10m) between the sidewalk and the entrance of a private apartment building. Especially if the path does not add any information to the routing (e.g. information not already provided by the entrance node or the sidewalk line), it makes the map unnecessarily complex (visually and logically) and hard to maintain.

Please note that I fully agree with mapping the access to public buildings with a more complex structure (e.g. shopping malls).

I really hope this helps understand the motivation behind my changeset,
Best regards,
Andy
DrayPrescot (2025-02-26 15:39:37+00:00): Hi andyblueg, 

Unfortunately, the current routing/navigation systems for pedestrians are not so advanced that they understand where the most sensible route to the entrance to a building is.
This is particularly unsuitable for blind and disabled people.
For this reason, the guidelines mentioned above also recommend always creating a footpath to the building entrance.
As an example you can see here https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=54.078009%2C13.40443&point=54.07744%2C13.404873&profile=foot&layer=Omniscale

Best regards, DP
andyblueg (2025-02-27 11:24:53+00:00): Hi DrayPrescot,

Okay, I get the point. It looks like this is more of a problem with the Graphhopper router ignoring entrance points. Also, you can see in your example that the Graphhopper even ignores the sidewalk along Ernsthofer Wende. I therefore tested other routers and found that OSRM and openrouteservice correctly route to the nearby entrance (see below). 

I was therefore wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to correctly place entrance points that can even be combined with addresses (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance#Entrances_and_addresses)

In more complex situations where the path is not straight, it is of course perfectly fine to add a path.

In my opinion, this would reduce the amount of work and make it much easier for people to find the entrance to more complex buildings.

Perhaps the Graphhopper developers could even be contacted to solve this problem.

Have a nice day,
andyblueg

..
Examples of other routers:

OSRM:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=54.077986%2C13.404441%3B54.077438%2C13.404883#map=19/54.077724/13.404403&layers=N

openrouteservice:
https://maps.openrouteservice.org/#/directions/Heinrich-Hertz-Stra%C3%9Fe%204a,Greifswald,MV,Deutschland/Heinrich-Hertz-Stra%C3%9Fe%2020b,Greifswald,MV,Deutschland/data/55,130,32,198,15,97,4,224,38,9,96,59,2,24,5,192,166,6,113,0,184,64,70,1,152,3,160,5,128,6,83,76,32,118,0,104,5,101,56,242,105,160,78,0,57,216,27,136,179,42,116,228,65,176,210,0,217,199,210,98,205,169,6,0,153,11,202,30,65,103,16,116,64,64,0,234,158,4,68,216,114,128,5,229,0,45,174,124,226,180,238,129,0,25,188,0,54,233,112,132,117,21,0,90,0,238,200,46,0,214,72,0,230,154,32,246,232,142,232,208,232,136,96,238,120,113,144,22,22,241,176,232,176,32,0,190,57,64,0,0
andyblueg (2025-02-27 15:05:22+00:00): Hi again,

Just in case you agree to merge address with entrance, I 've just learned that this can be easily done with the in-browser iD editor (select both and click merge in the context menu).

This follows moreover the guidline (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*#Where_to_add_the_address) that "the address tagging should be added to a particular node node sitting on the site outline or building outline (e.g. entrance, gate) [...] when an object has multiple addresses such as an apartment building with several entrances;"

Best,
andyblueg
DrayPrescot (2025-02-27 17:49:04+00:00): Hi andyblueg,

Good idea with the merging. Is there a description somewhere of how far it works with the entrance and the path in front of it? Otherwise it would also fit from my side if it generally works.

Someone could write to Grasshopper accordingly. The service is probably used more frequently than ORS.

Best regards, DP
Rubenke (2025-02-24 11:33:59+00:00): Waarom voeg je een parkeerplaats toe?
deze is er niet meer ivm verbouwing musis
gmbo (2025-02-26 20:20:19+00:00): Danke für das Löschen.
Wenn sie nicht existiert, sollte sie niicht in den Daten sein.
Vielen Dank für den Edit.
NeisBot (2025-02-24 17:01:10+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

I noticed that some of the tags and descriptions you've used appear to be related to #SEO #spam. I recommend reading the following page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam

Could you please confirm if your map edits here were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #TagSmartNotSpam
NeisRevert (2025-03-13 11:10:42+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/163565260
pavvv (2025-02-24 12:47:08+00:00): What's the point of this edit? We don't use quotes in names.
pyrog (2025-03-08 00:04:19+00:00): Bonsoir,

Ici un itinéraire du réseau pédestre à été cassé.
https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/13473703/map?layers=background,hiking,nodes,forward-route,backward-route,unused&position=45.80791048,5.84862255,20

Je corrige.

Yves
naa'in (2025-03-10 16:38:24+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai manqué de rétablir cette relation en validant mes modifications, merci pour votre vigilance et cette correction.

Bien à vous
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-25 23:40:49+00:00): This changeset deleted 2 highways.
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1350465042
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/696214052
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162888245
umbraosmbr (2025-02-26 20:43:39+00:00): hello.
No streets were deleted as you mentioned.

 What was deleted was a virtual line that we created for neighborhood boundaries and this line is obsolete, as I updated the neighborhood boundaries with new lines and other streets and these lines were no longer accurate.

Thank you in advance for contacting us.

yours sincerely, 

Raphael of Assis
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-02-26 20:56:05+00:00): I linked the streets that were deleted.
Piagno (2025-04-26 17:06:02+00:00): Hallo Longtimeweb
Danke dir vielmals für den Aufwand die Sissach-Gelterkinden Bahn hinzuzufügen. In OSM werden nur Sachen eingetragen, die auch in der realen Welt vorzufinden sind. Da die Bahn nicht mehr vorhanden ist, habe ich sie wieder entfernt.
Falls du die Bahn dokumentiert haben möchtest, dann schau dir Openhistoricalmap an, dort wird die Kartengeschichte dokumentiert.
https://www.openhistoricalmap.org

Grüess Piagno
Longtimeweb 13 (2025-05-04 08:23:43+00:00): Hallo Piagno
Diesen Eintrag habe ich für die OpenRailwayMap erstellt, damit die Bahninfrastruktur (auch ehemalige) vollständiger dargestellt wird. 
Hätte ich da noch etwas machen müssen, dass die Strecke nur dort auftaucht?
https://www.openrailwaymap.org
Grüess Longtimeweb
Piagno (2025-05-04 13:34:23+00:00): Ich verstehe schon, was du damit erreichen wolltest. Trotzdem ist es falsch, nicht mehr vorhandenes in OSM einzufügen.
Openrailwaymap hat das auch erkannt und stellt auf ihrer Karte nun neu die "alten/abgebauten" Strecken aus openhistoricalmap anstatt osm dar. Das ist aber relativ neu, kannst du dir ja mal anschauen, wie man es in OHM eintragen muss.
https://forum.openhistoricalmap.org/t/openrailwaymap-adds-openhistoricalmap/446
eggie (2025-02-24 12:10:05+00:00): Ik denk dat ze een partij borden hebben besteld en die  gewoon overal geplaatst hebben. Net als bij de Groeperkade. 
Dan krijg je oude en nieuwe bebording door elkaar.
Wanneer ik het niet zeker weet laat ik die accesstags bicycle=yes of no gewoon weg.
Bij de Groeperkade had ik die bicycletags met opzet weggelaten. 
Ik heb nooit de neiging gehad om bij het pad naar die bunkers te zuiden van de Grift naar binnen te fietsen en moeilijk te gaan doen bij dat hek.  
Maar Up to you. Neem aan dat je een lokale medemapper bent.
MartReiling (2025-02-24 12:22:51+00:00): Ja ben een lokale fietser:), ben ze specifiek afgefietst om te beoordelen. Ik zal de Groeperkade borden ook eens vanuit de Utrechtseweg en Oude Hollweg bekijken. Overigens, ik ben momenteel bezig met het vormgeven van een initiatief (voor o.a. ntfu, staatsbosbeheer, komoot) om fietstoegankelijkheid completer in de OSM te brengen in Nederland. Nu nog geen actieve edits van daaruit (edits Groeperkade etc is gewoon eigen/lokale edits). Als je mee wilt denken, mail me dan even op info@track-landscapes.com. Er komt nog een algemeen bericht in de OSM community.