piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2026-01-30 17:45:51+00:00): Hi KORAYREİS,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=28.81157&lat=40.51651&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to map bus routes properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses

Kind regards
Guido
Taya_S (2026-01-28 07:20:03+00:00): I have deleted the building you added. The shape does not match aerial imagery at all, and a height of 1.35km is wildly incorrect
NeisBot (2026-01-28 06:57:08+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/12347750268 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "barbershop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-06 06:06:22+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/177793886
NeisBot (2026-01-28 07:31:25+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13472162443 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Gift shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:22+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169383
(No visible changes after review)
finn-hound (2026-01-27 20:36:11+00:00): I should add that this was a test of BuildingsTools and Terracer, and that the buildings may be slightly wonky in their size. My apologies.
NeisBot (2026-01-28 07:31:27+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13504619502 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Boot store"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:23+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169385
(No visible changes after review)
swinetown (2026-01-27 19:33:25+00:00): *parking, rather
MassCartog (2026-01-28 14:21:33+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Thanks for the work you've done around this area. Wanted to tell you the features you removed in this changeset are valid. 

You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

I see you added these paths years ago, but It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being official or public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Please read this for more info:
osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
NeisBot (2026-01-28 07:31:28+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13504992164 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Lounge bar"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-06 06:06:23+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/177793886
NeisBot (2026-01-28 07:31:29+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13254715829 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Auto repair shop"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:23+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169386
(No visible changes after review)
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-28 01:24:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11782932290

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NeisBot (2026-01-28 07:31:30+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13468556537 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "HVAC company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:24+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169387
(No visible changes after review)
wolfbert (2026-03-09 20:23:56+00:00): Hallo, was war denn bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1471783663 mit width gemeint?
streckenkundler (2026-01-27 20:58:41+00:00): Wo wurde das disskutiert? :(
silversurfer83 (2026-01-27 21:12:16+00:00): Schau dir doch mal die verlinkten Dokumente an
streckenkundler (2026-01-27 21:27:03+00:00): Was ist so schwierig, das zunächst  einmal vorher in der entsprechenen Comunity des Landes zu präsentieren und zu disskutieren? Was?
Ich kann es dir sagen... Die Angst, daß es vielleicht zerredet und abgelehnt wird... 

Für mich sind diese undiskutierten und undgenehmigten Bot-Edits zur Zeit ein Weg, persönliche Sichtweisen hintenrum durchzudrücken und die Gemeinschaft nach jeweiliger eigener Sichtweise ungeliebte Disskussionen zu umgehen...

...Dann kommen wieder >1000 Sorry-Spam-CS-Kommentare

...der aller schlechteste, aller Wege... :(
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-27 22:44:36+00:00): reading changeset comments and following links would help
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-27 22:46:10+00:00): also, looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4290358711/history
Taya_S (2026-01-28 07:19:25+00:00): I have deleted the building tag you added. This does not appear to be a single building and was already tagged as landuse=commercial
eggie (2026-01-27 20:42:40+00:00): Top Willy, maar name=caravan 'moet' ook eraf net als caravan Willem.
Bij beschrijvingen niet name gebruiken.. dus niet name=bankje, huis, fietspad e.d. en svp ook geen persoonlijke informatie.
..building=static_caravan is voldoende.
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-01-27 20:47:51+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice
eggie (2026-01-27 21:44:34+00:00): name=....   verwijderd
Gr eggie
WillyO65 (2026-01-30 19:05:49+00:00): Hoi Eggie, ik ben het spoor bijster :-(
De caravans "Mieke" (buurvrouw) en "Willem" (ikzelf) staan op het terrein van de mensen die op nr. 90 wonen.

Het terrein is hun eigendom, wij pachten een stukje grond.
De caravans zijn echter ons eigendom.

Daarom zoek ik een manier om aan te geven wat van wie is.

Groet, Willem
eggie (2026-01-30 19:15:52+00:00): Dag Willem,

Dat kan..maar dan in een eigen layer.
Je kunt een eigen kaart maken met bv Umap.
Zie https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/

In osm horen die persoonlijke gegevens niet.

De community van osm heeft consensus om geen privegegens van bewoners op de wereldkaart te zetten.

In umap kun je je eigen kaart maken De achtergrond is dan osm, maar wij zien dan niet die namen van dr bewoners van die caravans.
Dus advies. Doe zoiets met umap.
Je eigen kaart kun je dan opnemen in bv een eigen website en..of uitprinten.

Maar dus geen privegegevens toevoegen aan osm.. alleen de tag building=static_caravan.
Mapse,
eggie
WillyO65 (2026-01-30 19:19:14+00:00): Dank je
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-27 20:32:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177779495 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism reported to DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19678
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-27 20:32:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177779495 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism reported to DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19678
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-27 20:32:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177779495 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism reported to DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19678
SomeoneElse (2026-01-27 20:15:49+00:00): Actually, ticket Ticket#2026012710000541
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-27 20:32:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177779495 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism reported to DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19678
NeisBot (2026-01-27 20:26:12+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (4 changesets) shows that 323 of your last 332 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23759536
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-27 20:32:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177779495 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism reported to DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19678
user_8655426 (2026-01-28 11:53:35+00:00): Thanks for fixing it!
That was my copy‑and‑paste mistake.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177779066
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-28 12:37:54+00:00): :)
ndf_maypole (2026-01-27 21:27:05+00:00): Bonsoir, vous avez recartographié la piste cyclable déjà présente sur la chaussée (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1278637969). Les raisons pour ceci ont été évoquées sur ce précédent changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177685698) et ont été discutées sur le chat Matrix d'OSM BE.
NeisBot (2026-01-28 07:31:32+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13471149772 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mexican restaurant"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-06 06:06:25+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178169389
(No visible changes after review)
NeatNit (2026-01-27 23:48:59+00:00): Hi

Bus stop names are taken directly from the Ministry of Transport using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gtfs2osm and should match the names that appears on signage and in navigation apps. If signs actually show "HaCarmel" please let me know, but generally I have to assume that the GTFS data matches the signage.

Feel free to bring this up at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/import-bus-stops-from-gtfs/117873 . Of course you can put HaCarmel in en1, but en will be enforced by gtfs2osm unless we reach a different consensus on the forum.
Dindia (2026-01-28 19:24:37+00:00): Hi! Thanks for paying such close attention to the changes.
The signs are definitely show HaCarmel. Otherwise I would know that, as I happen to pass at that station from time to time, and I would pay attention that it's written incorrectly. 

Take a look at these photos:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hof_HaCarmel_Train_Station_-_Haifa_%282332335177%29.jpg

https://www.flickr.com/photos/david55king/33218479098

https://haipo.co.il/en/item/605967

I'm writing in the forum as well.
Tomas_J (2026-06-02 19:10:07+00:00): Prosim, nelepit landuse na cesty (napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1471793440). S cestou sa potom neda pracovat. Dik.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-27 20:32:38+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 177778977, 177778996, 177779009, 177779015, 177779024, 177779036, 177779057, 177779065.
hexdebug (2026-01-27 20:54:53+00:00): I confirmed this suspected location about half an hour ago. However, it’s possible that this camera is off (along with all others in Sedro-Woolley), in response to a recent court decision: https://www.geekwire.com/2025/washington-state-cities-turn-off-license-plate-reader-cameras-amid-ruling-on-data-access/

Does anyone know how to determine whether or not a Flock ALPR is on?
Glassman (2026-01-28 19:29:02+00:00): For public bus stops we typically match exactly what the bus company uses. Can you verify it use the expanded version?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177779575
hexdebug (2026-01-27 20:55:26+00:00): I confirmed this suspected location about half an hour ago. However, it’s possible that this camera is off (along with all others in Sedro Woolley), in response to a recent court decision: https://www.geekwire.com/2025/washington-state-cities-turn-off-license-plate-reader-cameras-amid-ruling-on-data-access/

Does anyone know how to determine whether or not a Flock ALPR is on?
gurglypipe (2026-01-27 22:38:50+00:00): Nice work! Thanks for these changes.

If you’re going to be making more changes to farmland tagging, consider taking a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Gurglypipe/landuse, which is a writeup of the consensus tagging from a few of us for farmland and meadows in the north west.

In the case of this changeset, I think it would mean tagging the fields as meadow=pasture as well as landuse=meadow, as from memory all the land around Horton is improved or upland sheep grazing.

Hope that makes sense, happy to discuss further if you have thoughts on it. Happy editing :)
NorthYorkshire (2026-01-27 22:44:38+00:00): Thanks for the advice! I'll do this from now on as I plan to tag more fields which should be meadows or haven't been mapped as meadows around the area.
gurglypipe (2026-01-27 22:49:11+00:00): Wonderful, it’s great to see some more attention being paid to the map around Horton :D
Higashimado (2026-01-27 20:43:47+00:00): 从 http://www.tianshui.com.cn/news/zjts/2019090911134950268.htm 来看，似乎“耤口镇”才是本名，“藉口镇”是将错就错的官方名称，具体怎么判断交给当地 Mapper 吧
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 22:58:57+00:00): Consolidated duplicate POIs (one in the wrong location), removed SEO spam and cleaned up other tags in changeset 183802427

https://osm.org/changeset/183802427
Glassman (2026-01-28 19:28:14+00:00): Is the house actually named 1412? In osm we don't use descriptive names, the tags, in this case the housenumber tag, is sufficient.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177779874
eggie (2026-01-27 21:40:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
gszkr (2026-02-03 14:03:13+00:00): Co to za zmiany? 
Restauracje i bar pośrodku pasa zieleni między jezdniami??
NeisBot (2026-01-28 07:31:33+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13505200722 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Falcon Fly office"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-02-06 06:06:25+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178018006
eggie (2026-01-27 21:43:05+00:00): Dag Dennie.. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
gr eggie
Rainero (2026-03-17 22:10:59+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180029650
(unzulässige Quelle)
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:55:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:56:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
woodpeck_repair (2026-07-03 14:55:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 185044755, 185044712, 185044792, 185043031, 185044858, 185044854, 185044726, 185044802, 185044684, 185044693, 185043064, 185044766, 185044834, 185044779, 185043050, 185044776, 185043074, 185043054, 185044732, 185043091, 185044704, 185044746, 185044715, 185043085, 185044894, 185044810, 185044795, 185044765, 185044862, 185043059, 185044750, 185044758, 185043076, 185044812, 185044785, 185043015, 185043039, 185044823, 185044748, 185044738, 185044744, 185044734, 185044845, 185044702, 185044835, 185044888, 185044873, 185044731, 185044879, 185044817, 185044827, 185044789, 185044865, 185044720, 185044843, 185043045, 185044839, 185044849, 185044771, 185044694, 185044768, 185044707, 185043066 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed and buggy imports in Ivory Coast
Totor (2026-02-09 11:55:27+00:00): Hi Dmesa,
I believe you accidentally dragged Paradise Village Road ^_^ .
All perpendicular roads now have weird angles.
Keep up the mapping!
Cheers,
Totor
Dmesa (2026-02-09 20:35:16+00:00): Hi Totor,

I appreciate you catching this. I will be more careful when moving nodes/ways around.

Thank you,

Dmesa
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-28 00:44:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300816418

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-28 00:54:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300816418

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-28 01:14:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300816418

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-28 01:24:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300816418

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀