piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dino Michelini (2025-07-23 10:49:12+00:00): Per risalire allo user e relativa modifica devi analizzare le modifiche di ogni geometria riportata nel changeset: in pratica devi cliccare su ogni geometria che ha avuto lo scostamento. Esempio: Corso Grazia Deledda ad Oliena se clicchi sopra la geometria ti si apre un poupuo con scritto “No part of the changeset, indirect modification! Current: Way 419497599 with geometry change”. Cliccando su 419497599 Percorso: Corso Grazia Deledda (419497599) Versione #3 sistemazioni SP51 SP51bis SP51ter, circ. Oliena, strade provinciali collegamento SP22 SP58, aggiunta SP48. sistemazione gerarchia strade su indicazioni cartelli e tempi percorrenza Modificato 7 mesi fa da aboc Gruppo di modifiche #160371860. Il changeset 168976086 riguarda 3 percorsi non 2832 punti. Il mio user esce solo perché ho aggiunto alla highway alcuni tag tipo surface, tracktype, ecc.
aboc (2025-07-25 13:49:00+00:00): si, ma sto riferendomi ai singoli punti, per esempio https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1640749560 ha questo changeset in cronologia ma la way alla quale appartiene (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151256646) no
Leo Slager (2025-07-16 10:12:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-16 12:27:41+00:00): Why did you remove landuse?
MrSledge (2025-07-15 17:19:57+00:00): *Fixed area-subarea relationships between Kangaslampi (16248712) and contained administrative elements, since the contained elements appear to be independent segments labeled as administrative and of equal administrative level(9).
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-16 12:28:08+00:00): Why? Explain why you delete things.
pat-lachute (2025-07-16 12:33:00+00:00): Okay, yes, I understand. That said, no one is responsible for updating our sector, and it would be impossible for me to do it by editing element by element, because it is much too long. Moreover, my layers fit together perfectly, even taking into account the land registry. I have noticed, moreover, that other cities proceed this way. If we want quality and accurate mapping, we have no choice but to rest everything on solid foundations. I will continue, but if you tell me that it is strictly forbidden to proceed this way, I will stop.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-16 12:45:25+00:00): When you delete something, you should tel in the changeset message why and from which source. If you use land registry data, you need to ask permission from the MRNF (Ministère des ressources naturelles) and from MAMH (Ministère des affaires municipales et de l'Habitation) since the data available on Données Québec is with license CC 4.0, which is not fully compatible with OBDl (OSM). However, we are in the process of getting permission from both ministries to be able to use it. But we must be patient. You can get the discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/acceptation-du-mode-dattribution-dopenstreetmap-par-le-gouvernement-du-quebec/127403
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-16 12:49:29+00:00): On peut poursuivre en français si vous préférez. C'est seulement pour permettre aux autres usagers de comprendre le contexte.
pat-lachute (2025-07-16 13:37:17+00:00): Disons plutôt que je me suis basé partiellement sur les unités d'évaluation et d'autres couches qui sont en possession de la Ville de Lachute. J'ai les pleines autorisation pour les utiliser et créer les couches qui sont insérées dans OSM par la ville, puisque je suis employé de celle-ci. C'est pendant mes heures de travail, comme en ce moment, que je travaille à mettre à jour OSM. Par ailleurs, les deux géomaticiens de la MRC d'Argenteuil vont faire de même pour les autres municipalités. On souhaite juste donnée un coup de pousse car on a remarqué que notre territoire n'est pas mis à jour par la communauté. 

Let's say instead that I based myself partially on the assessment units and other layers that are in the possession of the City of Lachute. I have full authorization to use them and create the layers that are inserted into OSM by the city, since I am an employee of the city. It is during my working hours, like right now, that I work to update OSM. In addition, the two geomaticians from the MRC d'Argenteuil will do the same for the other municipalities. We just want to give it a boost because we noticed that our territory is not updated by the community.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-16 13:46:03+00:00): OK, super! Alors ce serait bien qu'on vous montre notre éditeur custom pour ces besoins. Je vous contacte par message privé.

Si vous faites de l'édition pour le compte d'une organisation, municiaplité ou autre, il faut ajouter une note entrée dans https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities

Nous l'avons fait de notre côté pour Chaire Mobilité (Polytechnique Montréal)
pat-lachute (2025-07-16 13:52:47+00:00): Je suis preneur, et il y a justement un autre objectif de la part de la Ville de Lachute pour la mise à jour d'OSM, c'est l'utilisation de SUMO pour la simulation routière.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-16 14:06:37+00:00): Excellent! On poursuit la conversation en messages privés.

À plus!
DD1GJ (2025-07-16 06:33:33+00:00): Hallo Nischo, willkommen bei OSM. Der von Dir angelegte "Mountainbikeweg" verläuft größtenteils durch das Naturschutzgebiet Wellenberge-Rüsterberg. Ein verlassen der offiziellen Wege ist dort verboten.

Ist dies ein offizieller Weg?

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Nischo (2025-07-16 06:46:44+00:00): Hi!

Danke für die Frage.
Der Weg wurde und wird meines Wissens nach genutzt (z.B. durch Spaziergänger, die angrenzende Schule oder geführte Wanderungen) und besteht schon, seitdem ich mich erinnern kann.
Er ist allerdings nicht so stark frequentiert, wie der nödlicher Weg.
Gleichzeitig fehlt auch noch ein Verbindungsweg zwischen diesen beiden Wegen bei OSM. Hier hatte ich gestern keine vernüntigen GPS Daten vorliegen. 

Gruß
DD1GJ (2025-07-16 07:34:55+00:00): Hallo Nischo, danke für Deine Antwort. Das Thema "Trampelpfade in Naturschutzgebieten" ist heikel und lässt sich aus der Ferne schwer beurteilen. Da vertraut OSM auf die Kenntnisse und Verantwortung der Mapper vor Ort.

Anhaltspunkte findest Du unter

https://openstreetmap.de/themen/naturschutz/

https://www.fossgis-konferenz.de/2021/data/FOSSGIS_Tagungsband_2021.pdf  Seite 52, Nationalpark

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix  (abandoned:highway)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
silversurfer83 (2025-07-15 19:11:12+00:00): Hi :)

die kleinen "Gärten": wäre da nicht "landuse=flowerbed" angebrachter?

cheers

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dflowerbed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168977693
SG86 (2025-07-15 20:02:18+00:00): Hallo,
doch das würde auch gut passen. Ich ändere es.
Viele Grüße
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-15 18:01:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13002311590

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Marek-M (2025-07-16 09:15:51+00:00): Cześć,
Nazwy w OSM zapisujemy w formie "Nazwa Własna" - Twoje nazwy napisane wielkimi literami są do poprawy.

Dodatkowo imię i nazwisko właściciela nie powinno być dodawane do nazwy, tylko do oddzielnego tagu `operator`.

Większość edytowanych obiektów można przypisać do odpowiedniego typu ustalonego w OSM.

Dodawanie niepełnego adresu do POI nie jest poprawne.

Poprawiłem Twoją edycję w tym CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169002814
bartgron (2025-07-15 19:42:46+00:00): Teraz ta ulica jest Żołnierska czy kiedyś była? Jeśli kiedyś była to zamiast name powinno być old name
YomanNH (2025-10-10 20:02:29+00:00): Patrząc na to, co ten użytkownik tworzy, to pewnie nie jest to ulica Żołnierska...
NeisBot (2025-07-15 18:12:35+00:00): Hi pat-lachute, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 99% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
No primary map features!?

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=168978633
pat-lachute (2025-07-15 18:22:42+00:00): Hi NeisBot, 

Yes, that's intentional. Don't worry. I'm a geomatics engineer for the City of Lachute. I've prepared all my layers with tags to update our area.

That said, I tried to find a way to delete everything at once, for example, the landuses, but it's really complicated with the nodes, paths, and relationships. Do you have any suggestions? That way I can quickly delete and then upload the new layers.

Greetings
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-16 06:31:37+00:00): Hi pat-lachute, welcome to OSM.

Do you know the following OSM wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Best regards
Brickblock1 (2025-07-16 09:09:12+00:00): Once again this is not a light rail line it's a train one with 120 km/h operation
literan (2025-07-15 19:20:33+00:00): и почему вдруг такая правка? правильно через place

addr:city можете добавить, но только в дополнение
vrrdv (2025-07-16 06:58:41+00:00): учту, спасибо
Tatfahren (2026-06-28 11:25:09+00:00): Gibt es den hier von euch eingetragenen Park noch?, also findet das festival ganzjährig statt?
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-15 18:20:48+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13002322667
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13002322668
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1244039376
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1306170300
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1315046023
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1315046025

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SOSOwner (2025-07-15 18:24:29+00:00): Line of route for the 17A and extended route 17 sourced from a bus operator publication (owing to SESX not publishing BODS data on this route at this present moment...): https://stephensonsofessex.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/48/2025/07/17-17A-07-25.pdf
hobbesvsboyle (2026-01-03 23:15:48+00:00): I see that you mapped a number of naloxone stations/kits. You may be interested in participating in the discussion about the appropriate tagging for these: 
- On the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/opioid-overdose-reversal-kit-naloxone/139983
- On the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Emergency_facilities_and_amenities
silversurfer83 (2025-07-16 14:22:15+00:00): Hi there :)

please don't connect landuses (and other physical objectes) to borders of any kind.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168979904
user_5359 (2025-07-16 13:24:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A shop is not a part of a street crossing. I remove your enry. Please move the note to the right building / position.
DD1GJ (2025-07-16 08:00:23+00:00): Hallo Nischo,

Du hattest hier versehentlich einen kilometerlangen Tunnel eingetragen und diesen mit der A2 verknüpft. Ich habe dies korrigiert und den Namen von den Teilstücken entfernt.

Ausgeschilderte Radrouten werden über Relationen erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16821237 . Je nach Baufortschritt kannst Du die Relation dann erweitern.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16821237

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Fahrradrouten_kartieren

Ich weiß, dass dies auf den ersten Blick recht komplex ist, aber das Ergebnis sieht Du z.B. bei 

https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=16821237&type=relation

Viele Grüße, Joachim
flohoff (2025-07-15 19:04:57+00:00): Moin,
ich habe hier den changeset gesehen.

Guck mal in deinen Editor - Es gibt normalerweise eine funktion Gebäude automatisch "Rechtwinkelig" zu machen.

Denn die meisten Gebäude sind rechtwinkelig und von Hand bekommt man das nicht hin.

Ist eigentlich in Essen das ALKIS auch Freigegeben? Denn in NRW sind die allermeisten Gebäude aus dem ALKIS - Also dem Liegenschaftskataster übernommen.

So long

Flo
silversurfer83 (2025-07-15 19:09:38+00:00): Flo meint die Taste "Q". Damit werden Objekte schön rechtwinklig.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168980554
Taya_S (2025-07-24 18:12:19+00:00): Reverted fake pokemon go edits DWG Ticket#2025072410000403

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169414877
Alexmol (2025-07-15 19:10:12+00:00): Actualização de posto de carregamento que entrou em serviço, título do changeset errado.
NeisBot (2025-07-15 20:16:30+00:00): Hi sashnikus_sashnikutus22229, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added woodland area by creating new nodes and a way, modifying existing ways, and tagging with natural=wood."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
citrula (2025-07-15 21:27:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions.

This edit looks good, but you drew a small section overlapping the existing cycleway going west - I went ahead and fixed that for you.
North Texas Trails (2025-07-15 22:40:26+00:00): Thank you!  This was my first attempt at this.   Any idea how long for it to show up on the map?  I checked and the trail is still absent on the main map.  

Thanks again for your help!
citrula (2025-07-17 01:01:37+00:00): You might be getting cached tiles still - it only takes a couple of minutes for them to render, but you need to convince your browser to go grab the new ones.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Browser_cache
jeslop (2025-07-21 15:23:42+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169250486
NeisBot (2025-07-15 19:26:34+00:00): Hi pat-lachute, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 4 natural(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

PS: I have also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=168981598
pitscheplatsch (2025-07-16 06:34:27+00:00): Same again, please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168978633
pat-lachute (2025-07-16 12:33:15+00:00): Hi  pitscheplatsch,
Okay, yes, I understand. That said, no one is responsible for updating our sector, and it would be impossible for me to do it by editing element by element, because it is much too long. Moreover, my layers fit together perfectly, even taking into account the land registry. I have noticed, moreover, that other cities proceed this way. If we want quality and accurate mapping, we have no choice but to rest everything on solid foundations. I will continue, but if you tell me that it is strictly forbidden to proceed this way, I will stop.
Alexmol (2025-07-15 19:26:03+00:00): Actualização de posto de carregamento que entrou em serviço, título do changeset errado.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-10 13:43:15+00:00): I'm not quite sure what would possess a non-SEO-spammer to add SEO spam tags to all these POIs apparently of their own accord, but I removed the SEO spam junk tags (blatant advertising in description=*, nonfree external image=* of the company logo instead of a photo of the location) and fixed opening_hours=* and other tags for East High Street POIs in changeset 183924790

https://osm.org/changeset/183924790

See https://osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam and https://osm.wiki/Key:description#No_advertising for more information.
Frans S (2025-07-20 10:29:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You know that you did not tag 17 buildings out of 163 buildings you mapped ?
Don't you use the building plugin ?
When you use this, it automaticly  square the building you map and tag it. You can also map fine round buildings with it.
Here is the link,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools
Best regards and keep mapping
jeslop (2025-07-21 15:20:10+00:00): Reverted on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169250303
NeisBot (2025-07-15 19:42:53+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisRevert (2025-07-16 06:35:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/168996418
where the changeset comment is: 
Remove spam
b-jazz (2025-07-16 14:17:27+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414980362

Hi Mezzy,

Can you please help me understand what you're trying to do with this golf course? It appears that you are simply tracing existing objects (fairways) and creating duplicate objects. I'm going to revert your changes, but want to check in with you so I can understand and help you achieve what you set out to do, but in a way that is compatible with OSM practices. Thanks!
Ltrlg (2025-07-15 19:41:46+00:00): comment ~ Angers-Loire-Métropole
YomanNH (2025-10-24 13:12:13+00:00): Wycofałem nadanie nazw do uliczek wewnątrz osiedla.
b-jazz (2025-07-17 16:08:33+00:00): Hey there dirty,

On the 7th hole, you broke the relation between the fairway and the inner "bunker" (looks more like a rough with the trees there, but that's irrelevant). I'm trying to make sure relations like this don't get broken so I wanted to reach out and work with people that make these edits. Were you aware that you were messing with the relation? What did you think was wrong with the way things were mapped previously? Thanks.
ivanbranco (2025-07-25 11:49:42+00:00): Ciao fgenoese,

nel campo del nome inseriamo solo nomi propri, non descrizioni come "Fontanella pubblica". Grazie e buon mapping!
gormur (2026-05-03 21:31:20+00:00): Thank you for your contribution. However, it seems like a good number of the ways you added to Kragerøbanen are more or less duplicates of already existing ways.
This relation contains all the existing ways: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1704761
Are you up to resolving the issue, or would you like some help on that?
StangyBee (2026-05-04 20:37:25+00:00): Thank you for letting me know. For some reason I don’t see the duplicates in the online editor but I do see it in Open Railway Map. I’m unsure why this is, do you happen to know why this is? There could also just be something I’m missing.
gormur (2026-05-14 18:32:36+00:00): Seems like iD (the online editor) prioritizes rendering of highway tags over railway tags when they are both present on a way. So what may visually look like a road in iD, is actually also tagged (correctly) as abandoned railway. So the two railway ways are still there, side by side, visible in iD, while one just _looks_ like a road...
gormur (2026-05-14 18:47:52+00:00): Also, some of the tags you put on the new railway ways, might as well go on the relation, so you don't need to add the same tags on every way. Thinking of name, gauge, start_date, end_date. Also, you added a source tag to each element; that better go into "Sources" field as you save the changeset in iD.
StangyBee (2026-05-21 08:12:22+00:00): Alright, ill go and fix it when I have time. Thanks for pointing this out to me.
Sylabowy Kot (2025-07-15 20:07:34+00:00): Ktoś zdolniejszy będzie mógł z tego zrobić relację czy odpowiedni landuse, wykorzystujacy label https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9609675651 

Na razie ułatwiłem robotę pod wyfiltrowanie budynków do takiego rozbudowania. 

BTW zmiana nie obejmuje tzw. "Osiedla Astronautów" z racji na nieodnalezienie jakichkolwiek informacji na jego temat - na budynkach nienależących do zmapowanego osiedla widnieje jedynie nazwa administratora (którym nie jest właśnie WSM "Ochota"). Jeśli widzi to osoba, która tego chciała - nie udało mi się, trzeba było pomóc, a nie ignorować fakt, który zmapowałem w tej zmianie.
Minh Nguyen (2026-01-22 23:48:55+00:00): Changeset 177587497 undoes most of this changeset. This stretch of highway hasn’t been SR 123 since 1999. Also, we should be using turn:lanes=* and change:lanes=* to represent lane change restrictions, not parallel link ways.
scarapella (2025-09-17 11:21:08+00:00): Hello Dartmouthmapmaker,

Thank you for your many contributions to openstreetmap. I noticed some collateral changes to some rapids in this changeset I wanted to discuss.  

Taking for example Priestly Rapids:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1347779147#map=16/46.85657/-69.51465

Previously:
* the way was tagged as a waterway=river+rapids=yes
** with the name= as the name of the river
* the way was surrounded by an area natural=water+water=rapids  https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1215586313
**with the name= of the area being the name of the rapids
*the way is in included in the river relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9723202 

After this changeset:
* the way is changed from waterway=river+rapids=yes to  waterway=rapids+rapids=yes
**with the name= changed to the the name of the rapids 
* the area surrounding the way tagging changed from natural=water+water=rapids to natural=water
** the way is still included in the river relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9723202 

Based on both the conventions I've seen in most places and the english wiki documentation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Drapids  I think the original tagging was more correct.  

I also don't almost no use of of waterway=rapids as the way tagging for section of rivers with rapids in the current OSM dataset (at least where I checked in NE US + eastern canada).  While there is/was some small usage of waterway=rapids to tag the centerline of rapids, it every example I found was in ADDITION to the waterway=river tagging (in alignment with the old, pre-2024 english wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:waterway%3Drapids&oldid=2618064 )  

cheers,
scarapella
scarapella (2025-09-22 20:10:57+00:00): Hello again,

I propose to do a partial, manual rollback of this changest to return the rapids tagging to be in line with the guidelines and practices stated above.  

Cheers,
Sean
scarapella (2025-09-22 20:29:06+00:00): I've implemented my proposed changes rollback through changesets: 172314558 and 172314390.
Bigoton (2025-07-16 00:56:21+00:00): ahh