piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dimitar155 (2026-03-12 20:43:50+00:00): Не е само козметично. Когато рампата е толкова удължена, не може да се добави коректна информация за ускорителните и забавителните ленти, съответно не е ясно каква е дължината им.

Чупките лесно се скриват, като се мръдне втория или предпоследния възел (виж https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/42.847335/23.078617).
foreigner037 (2026-03-12 20:47:36+00:00): Къде започва и къде свършва ускорителната лента?
Dimitar155 (2026-03-12 20:57:11+00:00): Не съм запознат да има конкретно правило. Аз лично считам края на ускорителната лента (или началото на забавителната) точката в която тази лента има около 50% от цялата си широчина.

Началото на ускорителната (или края на забавителната) е около 50-60 метра след (или преди) началото на физическия разделител (тревна площ или мантинела).
arjunaraoc (2025-11-29 08:59:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). JOSM is a good tool to map buildings as it can make it into perfect rectangles. Focus on single building mapping that is clear from satellite images.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175189141
arjunaraoc (2025-11-29 08:57:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175189233
BCNorwich (2025-11-27 12:41:33+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 
OSM has a practice of "One feature, one OSM element". Thus no need for a pin as the building is tagged with the feature. I've amended the tags with your new info.

Regards Bernard.
Pia Luisa Licaros (2025-11-27 09:44:58+00:00): Please note that I've used Bing Imagery..
stasiu512 (2025-12-10 09:59:36+00:00): Cześć, kiedy byłem tam ostatnio, jednak już spory czas temu, to pod znakiem ustąp pierwszeństwa stał znak nakaz skrętu w prawo zamiast znaku ronda, rozumiem że to się zmieniło?
Marek-M (2025-12-10 10:12:28+00:00): Na pewno wyjeżdżałem tam prosto na rondo tak samo jak inni kierowcy. Teraz zabiłeś mi ćwieka, czy nie ma tam nakazu jazdy w prawo, bo mogłem zareagować stadnie nie patrząc na znaki :)

W piątek postaram się podjechać i sprawdzić.
stasiu512 (2025-12-10 17:24:10+00:00): na różnych orto widać, że zmieniły się znaki poziome i żółtą linię ciągłą zmieniono na krótki fragment białej przerywanej więc zakładam że znaki pionowe też uzupełniono:)
Marek-M (2025-12-12 13:23:13+00:00): Wygląda na to, że nie złamałem przepisów wjeżdżając na rondo. Aktualnie wjazd od Magnackiej wygląda jak na zdjęciu: https://ibb.co/B5PRphRZ
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-27 18:53:09+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13335649601

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Vétérini (2025-12-24 10:28:01+00:00): Salut Pierre,

Je ne sais pas quelle est la source du parking vélos ouvert en wall_loops que tu as ajouté à la gare de Blois (nœud 13335657666), mais ça paraît très obsolète : vu sur place le week-end dernier, c'était un parking couvert et fermé en safe_loops mais qui n'est plus accessible définitivement ! ^^

https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?background=streets&focus=pic&map=18.34/47.584963/1.323869&pic=f1295cb7-e5ad-4dda-ac7c-0fcdc54196e8&seq=d72b69de-a173-4f5a-84d3-4f84763d350c&speed=250&xyz=212.20/-0.01/20
Jordi MF (2025-11-27 14:42:04+00:00): Este puente fue destruido en una inundación en 2024. No veo noticias de que se haya reconstruido. ¿Puedes asegurar que está de nuevo operativo?
uprkos (2025-11-27 17:48:16+00:00): Adres jest niekompletny. Brakuje addr:place.
Jordi MF (2025-11-27 14:43:18+00:00): Este puente fue destruido en una inundación en 2024. No veo noticias de que se haya reconstruido. ¿Puedes asegurar que está de nuevo operativo?
Jordi MF (2025-11-27 14:43:51+00:00): Este puente fue destruido en una inundación en 2024. No veo noticias de que se haya reconstruido. ¿Puedes asegurar que está de nuevo operativo?
Jordi MF (2025-11-27 14:44:39+00:00): Este puente fue destruido en una inundación en 2024. No veo noticias de que se haya reconstruido. ¿Puedes asegurar que está de nuevo operativo?
uprkos (2025-11-27 17:49:48+00:00): Adres jest niekompletny. Brakuje addr:city.
bartgron (2025-11-27 20:20:48+00:00): Zawsze widzę że w edycjach z Organic Maps brakuje addr:city. Może coś jest nie tak z aplikacją?
Jordi MF (2025-11-27 14:44:17+00:00): Este puente fue destruido en una inundación en 2024. No veo noticias de que se haya reconstruido. ¿Puedes asegurar que está de nuevo operativo?
bartgron (2025-11-27 21:38:30+00:00): Usunąłem opis punktu - OpenStreetMap to nie miejsce na reklamę
eggie (2025-11-27 12:14:50+00:00): Dag af, Verkeer.

review_requested 	yes

bicycle=no hoeft niet op highway=footway. 
Brandgangen krijgen een extra tag footway=alley

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-27 12:36:17+00:00): Lijkt me oke.

bicycle en horse heb ik verwijderd. Dat is allemaal default.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-11-27 12:34:12+00:00): Hoi,

Info samengevoegd met adresnode.
MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:50:55+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:50:56+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Cleaning service in NYC"
NeisReview (2025-12-13 21:06:24+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175198877
fortera_au (2025-11-27 11:26:42+00:00): DWG revert - using copyrighted sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175193863
eggie (2025-11-27 12:19:32+00:00): Hier svp toevoegen footway=alley

Brandgang.
Dat heeft te maken met de routering. 
Niemand ziet graag wandelroutes via brandgangen. 
Een kaartenmaker kan wat met die extra tag. 

MVG
eggie
dpolovinkin (2025-12-11 20:30:04+00:00): hi, I see you just added those buildings like that - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454132948, thanks! but....

if you want, you can draw them by the roof shape but please (!) position on the ground where building actually stands, because the way you map them - they are in incorrect position as the building doesn't stand where it's roof is shown on satellite, you get what I mean?
dpolovinkin (2025-12-11 20:32:12+00:00): see here - https://imgur.com/a/4P28k0i

to the left is how you map them, to the right - is how they must be actually mapped
dpolovinkin (2025-12-11 20:34:14+00:00): while here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1454136446 you do it correctly, puzzling... anyways will fix those which will see
BCNorwich (2025-11-27 12:44:34+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
No need for a POI for the playground, the area is tagged as such.

Regards Bernard.
aTarom (2025-11-27 19:10:36+00:00): Hi, it's
"parking:right:both"
ok?
at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40812163/history
Cheers
safado (2025-11-27 19:27:18+00:00): yes, ok :) - did not see that option
Raquel Dezidério Souto (2025-11-29 04:17:02+00:00): Oi,
Não entendi por que você  está usando chave alt_name_1 ao invés de usar múltiplos nomes separados por ponto e vírgula no alt_name. De onde veio essa regra? É algo do BR?
Nighto (2025-12-03 10:49:51+00:00): Olá Raquel, boa pergunta. Fiz a edição no iD, sem manipular as chaves diretamente, apenas utilizando o modo gráfico.

Fazendo uma rápida pesquisa vi que havia um bug aberto para corrigir esse problema, mas que em tese fora corrigido em 2024.

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9422
Nighto (2025-12-03 10:54:27+00:00): Abri um bug report no iD mencionando que o bug anterior está acontecendo novamente: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/11632

Antes que eu esqueça: obrigado por notar e reportar :)

[]s
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 04:05:59+00:00): Looks good!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175193451
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:50:58+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Health clinic in Los Angeles"
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:50:58+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-13 21:05:49+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175198841
aixbrick (2025-11-27 13:53:30+00:00): Danke :-)
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:50:59+00:00): For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Aesthetics clinic in Eagan MN offering facial treatments"
NeisBot (2025-12-13 20:50:59+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-13 21:04:35+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/175198800
Supaplex (2025-11-30 15:12:26+00:00): Why do you remove residential area? It is still there
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175193851
UnniMan (2026-01-26 05:25:54+00:00): I'm not sure about this one (and Langreo). They look more like branches, since no regional services go though them (similar to Pravia-San Esteban). They're just cercanías lines.
Frans S (2025-12-18 15:13:30+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
 * Please map individual buildings without collecting multiple nearby buildings into a single object.
Best regards and keep mapping
ivandhfr (2025-12-19 21:13:31+00:00): I thought I had already added gaps to all the building polygons, maybe about 0.2 m. Could you be specific about which ways were an issue so I can evaluate?
Frans S (2025-12-20 10:12:27+00:00): hi Check this out
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459216337/history#map=19/4.022462/98.286749
On this spot, nearly all buildings are connected to each other.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459218571/history#map=19/4.023050/98.288579

I am not 100 % sure, but keeping the ctr key down while you map avoid nodes to connect. (I use JOSM where this is the methode. I am no expert in iDeditor)

Best regards
Best regards
ivandhfr (2025-12-20 12:53:54+00:00): The links you provided weren’t my edits, though. I just checked this particular changeset, and I can confirm that the buildings have tiny gaps between them, even though they appear connected in Carto.

Thanks for the tip, by the way.
eggie (2025-11-27 12:16:42+00:00): horse=no hoeft niet op voetpaden.
mvg
eggie
eggie (2025-11-27 12:16:08+00:00): Review.. horse=no is default.
Niet taggen dus op voetpaden.

MVG
eggie
ilias_ (2025-11-27 11:54:06+00:00): No need to add 3047 to the name, you already added ele=3047
Negjana (2025-12-10 09:06:52+00:00): Hallo, deine Änderungen zu ETCS sind (wieder) falsch, ich habe das hier schon kommentiert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171067740#map=15/48.20733/16.19011

Ich werde die Änderungen wieder rückgängig machen, bitte tagge die Streckenabschnitte nicht wieder falsch.
ilias_ (2025-11-27 11:56:06+00:00): Great work, thank you. I changed these based on this discussion on the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/dairesel-kavsaklar/138070/19

which made me realize this is not an actual roundabout. Routing will say "take the second exit at the roundabout" while people are just going straight.
Aya Samir (2025-11-27 12:56:19+00:00): Hi ilias_,
Thank you. We are all here to make OSM maps better.
Best regards,
Aya
NorthCrab_upload (2025-11-27 21:53:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13316356303

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck (2025-12-04 09:59:11+00:00): I have removed a number of non-constructive comments from user 3D打印 on this changeset. Please don't call each other names. I will also review Simon1595's recent edits with regard to damaging borders or deleting data in the border region. This is tracked as DWG Ticket#2025120410000271
Snusmumriken (2025-11-27 13:19:13+00:00): Hej

Stockholms stad har beslutat att stava med stort G vid gatunamn som Olof Palmes Gata och de äger ju frågan, så det är därför samtliga gatunamn i Stockholm stavas på det sättet.
LudvigLind (2025-11-27 13:41:09+00:00): Hej! 

Tack för informationen. Jag brukar inte göra redigeringar i Stockholm vanligtvis och visste inte om att det fanns beslut om gatunamnen.
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 04:05:17+00:00): Would be good to know which imagery you used for this edit. Currently it's listed as bing which doesn't show any of the features you've mapped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175195362
crogfoxnova (2025-11-28 07:56:04+00:00): I did not use any imagery for this edit. None of the maps show the roads or houses. The only maps that shows the roads currently is Apple Maps. I live in one of the properties here so wanted to get it on the map.
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 13:44:47+00:00): Cool cool thanks for the clarification! And thank you for improving the map!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175195362
vectorial8192 (2025-11-28 01:55:35+00:00): I dispute the landuse change.

The buildings are damaged, but the *estate* itself is not: ref=H Wang Chi House is still standing fine.

Plans must be drafted as to what happens next, but until then ,`landuse=residential` it is.
Kovoschiz (2025-11-28 06:47:53+00:00): You could argue the `ruin*:landuse=residential` , but it's not being lived in now. It's a `=brownfield` , not `=residential`
vectorial8192 (2025-11-28 12:31:21+00:00): It is temporarily uninhabited; de jure it is still a residential estate. It is an unfortunate conclusion that the evac scope covers the whole estate. There are no plans for demolition yet. I fail to see why it must be not `=residential`.
Kovoschiz (2025-11-29 11:32:15+00:00): OSM is about the existing reality, and `landuse=` the existing use. `=brownfield` means it's not inhabited.
vectorial8192 (2025-11-29 14:06:58+00:00): @Kovoschiz

Your view is too rigid and orthodox. Does this mean, when ref=H Wang Chi House is approved for return in some medium-term future, that the entire land suddenly "resumes" to be `=residential`? Even though there are no actual changes to the estate itself?

imo a brownfield is a place with "nothing" in it, which implies non-inhabitation. Or, it's a place where land usage is undecided. It should be painfully obvious Wang Fuk Court to this date is still a residential estate.
Kovoschiz (2025-11-30 09:03:13+00:00): 1. What do you mean by there's "no actual changes to the estate itself"? `landuse=` is about the use. The use has changed from being uninhabited to inhabited. 
2. That's untrue. Abandonment without demolition is still `=brownfield` , as with many such polluted industries in reality in the common language. 
3. I don't see what's "painfully obvious". This can be described by `abandoned:landuse=residential` , and there are still `building=apartments` inside.
vectorial8192 (2025-11-30 10:57:11+00:00): Bottom line: ref=H is still standing healthily, so the estate cannot be not `=residential`. It is forced to remain `=residential`. Theseus's Ship and "maintain continuity" requires this to be `=residential`.

I have heard that the Wang Fuk Court Owners' Corporation will vote on the future of Wang Fuk Court sometime later. Until then, I will stand by my view that it's still `=residential`. The OC will decide what this landuse value shall become from `=residential`, if a change is to be agreed upon.
Kovoschiz (2025-11-30 16:17:08+00:00): 1. The structure is independent of the use. If there's no one living there , it's not `=residential` now. Unless you are arguing it's a short-term closure. 
2. `landuse=` is describing use, and OSM is about the existing reality. Legal status and plans don't affect that.
Kovoschiz (2025-11-30 16:18:18+00:00): 2. Eg if Wang Chi House returns, but the Court voted to rebuild, it's still `=residential` until they move out
Kovoschiz (2025-11-30 16:18:47+00:00): 2. As I said, whether this has been an estate would be covered by `abandoned:landuse=residential`
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 04:02:25+00:00): Looks good though it does seem like you've potentially mapped your home address.
I've mapped a few of the buildings around this, would love to get addresses for them as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175196221
wombatmaper (2025-11-29 00:24:56+00:00): would this not be diet:vegan=only?
yetzt (2025-11-29 00:29:00+00:00): no, the menu states that ayran is sold. https://www.veganescigkfte.de/
wombatmaper (2025-11-29 00:31:00+00:00): ahh nice, good catch!
yetzt (2025-11-29 00:31:23+00:00): also baklava containing milk.
silversurfer83 (2025-11-27 15:47:40+00:00): Moin Boris,

du hast hier die wiki tags an einzelne Gebäude gemacht. Die meisten gehören aber an das jeweilige Gesamtgelände. Da müsstest du nochmal nacharbeiten und das korrigieren

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175196807
MaliMrav (2025-12-01 08:52:38+00:00): Hi Fergusolooney,

I don't really understand this change in bus station name that you did.

Can you please explain. It looks like an error to me, but maybe I miss something.

Regards,
MaliMrav
CanopyFalls (2025-11-28 13:43:16+00:00): Loving the detailed improvements to platforms! TYSM for adding this data to the map!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175197033
Dodko (2025-12-05 09:49:54+00:00): Adrese chýba správne addr:place môže byť
Malé Stankovce
Rozvadze
Sedličná
Veľké Stankovce
user_5359 (2025-12-12 11:33:15+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13336020996. What is the mean of the key ref:FU? If this is not a cross-country reference number, ref:AR:fu would be appropriate.
pertile (2025-12-19 11:29:04+00:00): Thanks, I changed it with ref:AR:H:FU
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-11-29 13:40:29+00:00): il n'y a pas de pistes cyclables maintenant ?
zaizone (2025-11-29 13:59:08+00:00): Salut, je n'y ai pas vu de pistes. Peut-être qu'il sera matérialisé quelque chose avec de la peinture au sol, mais je vois cela plutôt comme une esplanade, donc un espace partagé. Je retournerai voir d'ici l'inauguration de la ligne de tram.
zaizone (2025-11-30 11:08:05+00:00): La place de Chine devient effectivement une zone de rencontre, sans piste cyclable tracée. Voir ici : https://api.panoramax.xyz/?s=fp;s2;pe0a45056-ba51-4b94-887b-bb76ab40a5eb;c264.67/-0.33/0;m17/43.593385/3.843713;vd
Lyon-St-Clair (2025-11-30 11:37:07+00:00): merci, j'ai ajouté quelques détails au passage en fonction de ces images
Anonymous897234 (2025-11-27 19:27:25+00:00): Source was https://t-doitsumura.co.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/xmas2024-map.png
eggie (2025-11-27 13:03:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback:   De gebouwnamen beter toevoegen op de gebouwomtrek. Op de node zie je niets.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Lucas Kosters (2025-11-27 13:06:09+00:00): Bedankt voor de reactie, eggie!

Ik kom graag met iemand in contact die mij kan adviseren mbt het maken van aapassingen voor het aangewezen terrein. Wij maken van OSM gebruik voor persoonsalarmering op de aangegeven omgeving (zorglocatie van Pluryn). Ik had deze bovenstaande wijziging nu als test ingevoerd om te kijken hoe het er uit zou gaan zien op de zorgtelefoons die wij gebruiken.

Grt Lucas
divaddivag (2025-11-27 18:21:35+00:00): Re-bonsoir! Représenter tous ces pseudo-sentiers identifiables à l'imagerie n'a pas de sens ni pour le routage ni à l'usage. Soyez sélectif, en identifiant les cheminements principaux en vous aidant par exemple de la heatmap Strava. Pour information, la Pointe du Siège est en phase de renaturation, on trouve ce genre de panneaux sur place: https://ouistreham-rivabella.fr/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Panneau-travaux-Pointe-du-Siege-scaled.jpg . Bonne soirée David
solcarlus5 (2025-11-28 12:52:03+00:00): Je vais souvent dans la zone. Ces chemins sont tous parfaitement praticables. Ce n'est pas a6vois de choisir ce qui doit être représenté ou non. Ces chemins existent. Ils ont utilisés notamment par les pratiquants de BMX. Ils doivent donc être représentés.
divaddivag (2025-12-01 09:33:05+00:00): Merci pour votre retour. Je vous rassure je ne suis pas le gardien du temple ni doit décider des choix d'édition des autres contributeurs. Je m'excuse si cela a pu être interprété ainsi. Pour ce type d'environnement, j'essaye d'être sélectif sur les cheminements qui rentre dans la base, ce qui n'est pas toujours simple et n'est qu'un avis personnel. Vous connaissez cet endroit beaucoup mieux que moi (je ne savais pas qu'il s'agissait d'un spot pour la pratique du BMX) et vous avez cartographié sur la base d'observations terrain, donc indiquez-le dans le champ source de votre changeset pour éviter toutes confusions futures! 
Bonne journée, David
kitsee (2025-11-28 23:16:36+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175258121
literan (2025-11-27 20:05:54+00:00): только это https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188057512 не parking=surface а parking=lane или street_side. Поправишь? а то лень панорамы смотреть
pfg21 (2025-11-28 06:14:05+00:00): да. паралельность отметил, а тип поставил автоматически
eggie (2025-11-27 13:45:13+00:00): Dag golfminer.. Weet je het zeker, want dit is een stuk met een maxspeed 50

MVG
eggie
golfminer13 (2025-11-27 17:00:27+00:00): Hallo eggie, je hebt gelijk; ik had deze gemist, ik zal het weer veranderen naar hoofdweg en verbindingsweg van hoofdweg met de juiste snelheid.
Mvg,
golfminer13
eggie (2025-11-27 17:03:58+00:00): Top..
Meestal klopt de infrastructuur wel als die door ervaren mappers is ingevoerd.

Groet..
eggie
eggie (2025-11-27 17:25:03+00:00): Ik draai die twee changesets even wat terug, want nu worden het weer andere tags.
Vinber-Pro (2026-06-03 14:02:56+00:00): bonjour
concernant la caféteria, est-ce un lieu ouvert aux étudiants, aux "publics" qui viendrait sur l'université boire un café et manger ?

c'est géré par une entreprise type sodexho ou autres comme le crous ?

merci pour ces contributions
OlivierIAE (2026-06-03 14:28:15+00:00): Bonjour,
Effectivement tout public peut venir se restaurer ou prendre un café dans cette cafétéria tenue par IZEE via un marché UBO