piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ZLima12 (2025-10-23 00:46:27+00:00): I would support that, but there are a couple concerns that I'd want addressed first. motorway=yes is currently used to mean motorway-like access restrictions, not physical characteristics. So, there would need to be a plan/proposal to migrate the existing data using this tag to some other key. The original proposal for motorway=yes actually was what we're talking about: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Motorway_indication

The other thing is whether we should use motorway=* at all, or if there is some other key that would be better. I can't think of a better one at the moment; I think the proposal I linked above looks quite good. Of course, if we pick a key that isn't used now, we won't have to go through the process of moving the existing motorway=yes data.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-08-15 22:57:38+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18613
eggie (2025-08-16 07:54:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback.. Probeer indien mogelijk bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
mariotomo (2025-08-18 05:24:26+00:00): Hola. La UPI que acabas de añadir a la base de datos, es otra cosa que el IPI ya presente?
dsaldias (2025-08-18 12:52:54+00:00): Hola, si la UPI es Universida Politecnica Internacional, IPI ni idea que es :)
Taya_S (2025-08-16 10:01:16+00:00): Reverted undiscussed road classification changes by sockpuppet accounts

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170515279
mariotomo (2025-08-18 05:21:24+00:00): Hola. Añadiste un elemento que no tiene nada más que su nombre. Deberías categorizarlo de alguna forma. Si necesitas ayuda, a toda disposición. Quizás puedas explicar qué es Esas Latam? Tiene página web?
dsaldias (2025-08-18 13:00:57+00:00): Hola, si Esam Latam es el grupo corporativo actualmente adquirio UPI la Universidad Politecnica Internacional e ISPI el Instituto Superior Politecnico Internacional

La paginal web de esam latam es: 
https://esamlatam.com/

Categoria de Educacion Posgradual
Sylabowy Kot (2025-08-16 09:13:29+00:00): Mam nadzieję, że nie rozjechało się to z drogami pożarowymi, których relacje akurat wtedy mapowałem i miejscami rozdzielałem istniejące linie.
Mapa ambon myśliwskich w Polsce (2025-08-16 09:41:49+00:00): Nie powinno. Niemal nie modyfikowałem istniejących dróg, dodawałem jedynie nowe. Poza oczywiście node'ami na skrzyżowaniach.

Wyjątkiem była droga pożarowa nr 50, która była dotąd zmapowana jako ścieżka. To dosyć szeroka gruntówka, przejezdna na całym odcinku (chociaż raczej terenówką), więc ją otagowałem bardziej adekwatnie.
Glassman (2025-08-16 21:32:03+00:00): Isn't the QFC accross 228th Ave SW? I've reverted this edit but can restore it if the QFC did moved.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170499546
Tomas09 (2025-08-18 10:44:30+00:00): changeset 1000
Glassman (2025-08-16 21:32:12+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170499810
joost schouppe (2025-09-04 09:04:04+00:00): Worden in het parochiecentrum misvieringen gehouden? Indien niet, dan is place of worship hier niet echt op zijn plaats
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-10-05 00:51:22+00:00): Please don't connect bridges to the roads they cross.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170499957
ika-chan! (2025-08-16 02:52:12+00:00): Hello, where is the disagreement that led you to delete the objects? I don't think we delete objects because it is not open to the public.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170500042
ikorniachtos (2025-08-16 07:25:12+00:00): What happened is totally ridiculous. After so many years of the road been un-named and using reference points to meet up or receive objects i decided to move forward the procedure to get a name and define it here and google maps. I asked everyone else in the neighbourhood about the names we agreed on the name and after three weeks (a few days before placing the street sign and being visible on google maps as well) two of the total 18 people here decided the name will be either what they newly decided or nothing.. Its infuriating. So i am dropping everything and they decided to move forward with the procedure on their own.. If you believe that its not proper to delete them we can move forward with just removing the address name. Whatever you believe is proper.
ikorniachtos (2025-08-16 07:25:29+00:00): The road is private btw
ika-chan! (2025-08-16 14:45:48+00:00): Hello, since the data used Bing Aerial Imagery, they are totally fine and I have reinstated the data with modifications to road access information. However, Esri World Imagery is our aerial imagery of choice because they are often the most recent.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170500042
granitschädel (2026-02-23 19:01:03+00:00): "Disused" meint eher: langfristig ungenutzt. Die deutsche Übersetzung ist unpassend. Solange der untere Abschnitt nicht befahren werden kann (auch wegen der Brücke Coschützer Straße), ist "disused" die bessere Wahl
HellMap (2025-08-24 18:03:35+00:00): Sveiki,

Nosaukumus tulkot nevajadzētu, ja tie nav oficiāli nosaukumi. OSM nenorāda tulkojumus, bet jau esošus nosaukumus (kas var būt tulkoti, bet tos mēs netulkojam paši). Piemēram, tūrisma mājas lapā vai uz informācijas dēļa vai kādā oficiālā datubāzē. Lielākajai daļai vietu nosaukumu citās valodās nav. Citādi sanāk patvaļīgi tulkojumi, kas var arī nebūt pareizi. Piemēram "dzirnezers" nav "lake" un "tautas nams" nav "community house" (ja vien tas nav šādi nepareizi tulkots oficiāli) utt. Arī īpašvārdi netiek burtiski tulkoti piemēram "Baznīcas ceļš", kas tad būtu "Baznīcas road" vai "Baznicas road". Skatoties piemēram https://kandava.lv/en tulkots tur nav gandrīz nekas. Šādus aprakstošus tulkojumus var gan pielikt `description:en` tegā.
richlv (2025-08-25 12:23:52+00:00): Šobrīd ir palikuši tādi kā šis, kurš arī kā tiešs tulkojums nav precīzs:
name 	Zemītes dzirnezers
name:en 	Zemite lake

Kā šos vislabāk būtu sakopt?
Glassman (2025-08-16 21:32:18+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170500319
user_5359 (2025-08-17 06:58:00+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/1902682. What ist the mean of the tag UArea = 3194.72? 
Is this a national reference number for administrative areas? Wouldn't nat_ref:VN:area be easier to interpret?
Taya_S (2025-08-16 10:01:17+00:00): Reverted undiscussed road classification changes by sockpuppet accounts

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170515279
TrickyFoxy (2025-08-24 22:16:56+00:00): Похоже вы случайно нажали на кнопку редактирования места в OpenStreetMap, а не метки. Чтобы отредактировать метку нужно нажать на иконку карандаша
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-15 22:20:56+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13073304750

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Sylabowy Kot (2025-08-16 09:15:39+00:00): Naniesione drogi pożarowe: 42-51
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-15 22:30:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422559088

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
German C (2025-12-03 20:49:59+00:00): Hola Lolj, ¿por que eliminaste las áreas comunes ubicados en los centro de los bloques de edificios? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170501566
luisforte (2025-08-16 11:16:06+00:00): Olá
Faz sentido colocar o nome "Igreja Paroquial do Ferro" num landuse, em vez de o colocar no edificio dessa igreja?
JoaoPaixao (2025-08-16 13:48:23+00:00): Olá, a interpretação foi a seguinte, no recinto do landuse=religion consta um edifício principal projetado para uma estrutura de igreja, um outro edifício complementar ao lado e uma torre do sino. Tudo dentro desse recinto assumo que pertence e é gerido pela Igreja Paroquial do Ferro. 
No entanto o que sugeres é que seja colocado somente sob o edifício o amenity=place_of_worship ? E ficando o restante espaço, não como lugar de culto e somente operado pela Igreja Paroquial do Ferro?
luisforte (2025-08-16 18:26:52+00:00): Não teria melhor ideia, parece-me mesmo a mais adequada, ficando o edifício corretamente identificado como O place_of_worship.
A minha motivação para comentar o changeset é a consistência de dados. Não tão importante, o edificio da igreja (place_of_amenity) fica com outra aparência na cartografia OSM da forma que sugeres, ficando uniforme com as restantes no país (e planeta).
JoaoPaixao (2025-08-18 07:59:52+00:00): Foi feito uma alteração, confirmas que era o mencionavas?
luisforte (2025-08-18 15:56:51+00:00): Sim 👍
luisforte (2025-08-18 16:03:35+00:00): Entretanto reparei que criste um objecto coicidente com o edifício da igreja e apagaste o edifício que já existia. Referia-me a colocar o place_of_amenity no mesmo edificio da igreja (building=church)
TrickyFoxy (2025-08-15 22:40:31+00:00): todo: восстановить запреты на повороты
TrickyFoxy (2025-08-15 23:10:00+00:00): fixed
b-unicycling (2025-08-16 16:12:17+00:00): Thanks, I had forgotten to fix it, once I got home.
InsertUser (2025-08-16 19:44:39+00:00): Please save in between edits in different continents.
大山かなめ (2025-09-30 06:28:06+00:00): こんにちは
この編集では、近隣に道路が建設中であるとマッピングされている（https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1247677742 ）を見落として、建設用地に干渉する古い道路のノード（https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1419388326 ）を操作しています。
航空写真で分かる範囲であっても、あなたがノードを移動した道路はすでにないことが確認できます（Esriなど）ので、今一度新しい状況をご確認ください
rempshaener (2025-08-16 08:04:59+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Die Verwendung von area:highway ist okay und grundsätzlich eine gute Idee, das ersetzt dennoch keine zusätzlichen Wege. D. h. ich hätte die beiden Wege nicht gelöscht. 
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
wolfgang kuehn (2025-08-16 21:18:49+00:00): Es ist ja nur eine, zusammenhängende, Treppe und wäre daher mit einem Objekt ausreichend beschrieben.
rempshaener (2025-08-17 09:05:38+00:00): Hallo,
ich hielt die drei Wege für einen guten Kompromiss. Auf vergleichbaren Flächen sieht man auch schon einmal 10 Wege und mehr. (Siehe z. B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.198474&mlon=6.694091#map=19/51.198473/6.694091&layers=N)
Das area:highway hat zwei Nachteile: es wird von den wenigsten Nutzern gerendert und es ist nicht routingfähig.
Hier gibt es aber sicherlich kein "richtig" oder "falsch".
Viele Grüße
user_5359 (2025-08-17 09:50:02+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/717477900. What is the mean of the tag fixme_z = a_verif ?
Valenting01 (2025-08-17 17:04:32+00:00): Hello, It's a mistake, I just removed it
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-15 23:30:54+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422559088

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-16 06:31:44+00:00): #NameChange

Hi, welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, you have made numerous name changes, which included removing/modifying names. Are these changes being made in coordination with the local community? Additionally, could you share more information about your sources?

I would appreciate a response.

Thank you.
unemtlmappeuse (2025-08-26 19:46:41+00:00): Resto Fusion Latino doesn't exist anymore, thus why I deleted it. The venue was most recently used by the Hochelaga NDP rep during the most recent Canadian elections
texent (2025-08-15 23:51:27+00:00): 追記:田中家住宅エリア化と史跡ポイント追加
KhalidKashmiri (2025-08-16 00:20:16+00:00): Niby co ja tam zmieniłem pod Pułtuskiem?
NieWnen (2025-08-16 14:28:29+00:00): Dotknąłeś kilka dróg w jakiś sposób.

Zrobiłem drobną korektę, bo te oświetlenie w stron gm. Michałowice trochę poleciało za daleko, a tam jest w sumie odcinek nieoświetlony :P
KhalidKashmiri (2025-08-16 20:22:58+00:00): Racja, dzięki.

Chociaż dowiedziałem się, że Skorosze, Skoroszki oraz Skorosze leżą na tej samej długości geograficznej
Glassman (2025-08-16 21:34:42+00:00): #TIP: we don't use descriptive names in OSM. Unless the camp is named "Camp Pitch near Trapper Creek Trail" can you remove the name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170503130
Patchanka (2025-08-16 15:20:56+00:00): bonjour

ce n'est pas la peine de remplir cette quête qui ne fonctionne pas bien ici...
En effet le nom de maison est renseigné en composante de l'adresse (discutable selon moi) c'est pourquoi  StreetComplete demande de préciser la rue... Mais l'adresse est bien renseignée par ailleurs déjà donc cela créé simplement des doublons d'adresse (avec risque d'erreur dans le nom en plus).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4128492392

Si vous faites cela la prochaine quête que demandera SC est d'ajouter le numéro d'adresse et ainsi nous aurons encore plus de doublons... :-(

Ce n'est que mon avis, mais je conseillerai de désactiver cette quête
papizhulo (2025-08-18 10:59:48+00:00): ok je désactive, merci:)
Patchanka (2025-08-19 18:33:17+00:00): merci beaucoup :-)
joost schouppe (2025-09-04 08:56:35+00:00): Vergeet niet van kapelletjes op zo'n manier te mappen dat ze te onderscheiden zijn van kerken. building=chapel is een eenvoudige oplossing
Tom Ameye (2025-09-04 14:01:04+00:00): Oprechte excuses!
OddlyAngled (2025-08-19 15:24:41+00:00): if this alternate isn't an official trail (like a ducked route around snow) please add informal=yes and a sac_scale= (if suitable). thanks for the update!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170503642
Jordi MF (2025-08-17 14:06:15+00:00): Bienvenido Polarograma,

He visto que has liminado el nodo del centro de salud para añadir el nombre en un área. Sin embargo, en ese nodo estaba el número de teléfono que ahora se ha perdido y, también, la etiqueta usada para los centros de salud pequeños, que solamente suelen tener un médico (amenity=doctors). ¿Era incorrecto el número de teléfono?

Si era correcto, te animo a que recuperes esa información y la añadas al áreas.

Saludos
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-18 10:56:29+00:00): fa: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

Please read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-16 06:37:24+00:00): #KeepTheHistory

Hi, thanks for your contribution! 

I noticed you deleted and redrew some features instead of editing the existing ones. In OpenStreetMap, it’s usually better to adjust the geometry of existing objects rather than replacing them completely.

This way we keep the history, preserve any important tags, and avoid breaking relations like routes or boundaries. Redrawing can accidentally remove valuable details and make it harder for others to track changes.

For future edits, please try to move or reshape the existing nodes instead of deleting them — this helps maintain OSM’s data quality and history. Thanks again for helping improve the map.

Best regards.
Mikhail Kuzin (2025-08-16 18:04:18+00:00): Hi, thank you for your feedback.

Please tell me, this is very important to me and probably to many in the future. What exactly in this package of edits breaks history, any example? I made a split of roads to mark parking and correctly indicate changes in the number of lanes. The nodes themselves were all saved, only objects like way were deleted. Does it make sense to save one small old piece if we cut way into 5 small parts? What is the point of this, where can I read and find out?

You can see the set of changes in more detail at this link. To see before after + diff tags of objects. 

https://osmpie.org/app/editor?bakeId=80cb126a-79a6-4b6f-8160-f3a2785a841b&pos=73.387911&pos=54.971358&zoom=18.23&tile=Osm

Why is your answer (help maybe) important to me? Because these edits are made in a special editor, which we are preparing for publication. And if we put algorithms into it (split, for example), which violates something, then other users will start doing it too.

Thank you for your help
pitscheplatsch (2025-08-17 07:07:09+00:00): Hi, thank you very much for your detailed response and for sharing the link.

To your question: splitting ways (for example, to indicate parking lanes, different numbers of lanes, surfaces, or speed limits) is absolutely correct and often necessary. That by itself doesn’t “break history.” The issue arises when an existing way is deleted and replaced with a brand-new one instead of splitting or modifying the original geometry.

Here are your changes visualized for reference:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=170505416#16/54.9706/73.3859
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=170505416

In particular, e.g. you removed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203198889
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103836373

and replaced them with new ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422581905
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422581900
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422581901
Mikhail Kuzin (2025-08-19 08:56:48+00:00): Hi Pascal

We've reworked the split algorithm a bit, made it more like ID. And I've edited the neighboring intersection.

Could you take a look at this changeset in terms of the correctness of saving history and other things. I'd be very grateful.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170654709#map=14/54.97056/73.39865
user_5359 (2025-08-17 19:08:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1422582405 (one of six ways). What is the mean of the tags
bar_mehvar = 16.0
block_type = 1
code = 1035
edarekol = جنوبشرق
edarekol_i = 9
end_stati0 = 595
end_stati1 = 1741.977
end_statio = ميرجاوه
featureid = 100062503
length = 37.152

province = سيستان و بلوچستان
province_i = 13
published_ = 2020-01-17
start_sta0 = 592
start_sta1 = 1701.577
start_stat = خان محمدچاه
?
Please notice also the language of the name is written with a colon between name and language code
name:en = Khanmohamadchah_Mirjaveh
name:fa = زاهدان-پاکستان

And even without further language skills, I can see that the content of the change comment does not describe your changes.
stevea (2025-08-16 18:49:04+00:00): Nice work, thank you!
eggie (2025-08-16 07:52:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback:  Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt aangepast.. Update zegt niemand iets. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
yelisey90 (2025-08-18 10:01:50+00:00): rv - there is nothing in laws or signs to prohibit walking on this road

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170607274
Comino (2025-08-16 09:33:07+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin
LordGarySugar (2025-08-19 01:06:38+00:00): Hi, why do all of your changesets have a 'blog' tag linking to "ministry of health" substack articles full of crazy nonsense??? This is not relevant to OSM!!!
buy_osmand (2025-08-19 03:28:02+00:00): what else is non relevant? let me observe your quality of changesets please? paste in your url here for me to  model after...
woodpeck (2025-08-19 08:34:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18634
buy_osmand (2025-08-19 08:39:32+00:00): 
Dear buy_osmand,

other users have made you aware that your changeset comments are not in line of what we expect in OSM (osm.org/changeset/170506011, osm.org/changeset/170377199).

Yet you have just uploaded another changeset that has the following problems:

Unnecessary verbiage in changeset comment that distracts from actual OSM edit comment (“to the 🧍‍♀️🧍‍♂️ who align, #Living_credits (11oz silver) are now active❗❗; “)
Changeset tags that are not in any way related to OSM (links to online articles promoting non-OSM projects or world-views, hashtags doing the same)
Changeset tags exhorting people to install certain plugins, read certain wiki pages
Please stop doing that.

Your latest changeset osm.org/changeset/170655185 should have had the changeset comment text of “indicate that these highway(s) are with *=lines”, and the tags “created_by”, “review_requested”, and “source”, and that’s it.

Please also stop referring to religious scripture of any kind in your changeset comments, and stop commenting on your own edits with content that is not in any way OSM related.

This message blocks your account until you have read the message. You can continue mapping normally afterwards.

Best regards
Frederik Ramm
OSMF Data Working Group
buy_osmand (2025-08-19 08:40:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170377199#map=17/1.427216/103.825114&layers=S
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170506011#map=19/1.426366/103.844740&layers=S
buy_osmand (2025-08-19 08:50:19+00:00): https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms#Rights_Granted
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Produced_Work_-_Guideline
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Substantial_-_Guideline
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Produced_Work_-_Guideline
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Community_Guidelines
buy_osmand (2025-08-19 09:00:18+00:00): You three have truly disrupted my appetite to eat. I shall cool off and not return for the longest while again for the second time .. such a heart wrenching experience to give your time and energy to mapping your own nation's map.. I've caused no harm and no loss yet this is the judgement .. good day ... have a good time organising SotM 2025 😢
LordGarySugar (2025-08-19 16:00:16+00:00): I'm not complaining about the quality of your edits, just that it's hard to understand what you are changing on the map with all the spam in changeset comments about 11oz silver and links to AI written blogposts
buy_osmand (2025-08-19 23:16:28+00:00): I stand in protest of you lamenting, LordGarySugar. You are dismissed. I am now tasked to be watchful over edits made by others. I've recently made a pledge to another new mapper and have lawfully adviced to make contact with the legal team of OSMF. You may make known your position there. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170599877

April 10th, Mankind is free 🚶‍♀️🚶‍♂️
LordGarySugar (2025-08-20 00:01:18+00:00): What do you mean April 10th Mankind is free???
buy_osmand (2025-08-20 00:04:31+00:00): Once again, you may participate in the discussion that i have invited you to discuss. You seem to be distracted by a signoff at the end of a written message LordGarySugar.

ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ,
as-salāmu ʿalaykum,