piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Lezurex (2025-04-08 17:54:49+00:00): Hallo Matthias,

Die Einheit ist bei diameter_crown nicht nötig. In OSM ist das grundsätzlich standardmässig überall der Meter, ausser bei diameter (aber nicht diameter_crown). Falls mal eine andere Einheit genutzt wird, wird diese jeweils mit einem Abstand dazwischen angegeben: "1 ft"

Kannst du das entsprechend anpassen?

LG Lezurex
eggie (2025-04-08 14:19:52+00:00): Dag Jesse .. Probeer direct op de adresnode bij te taggen. Je hoeft geen adressen aan te maken in OSM.

MVG
eggie
dpolovinkin (2025-04-11 18:41:41+00:00): вы читаете комментарии что вам пишут - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161622964? я просил вас не оставлять безсмысленных комментариев к вашим изменениям, вы не отвечаете и продолжаете это делать.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-05-18 05:01:18+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18238
rskedgell (2025-04-08 13:46:19+00:00): * Star Hill, not Star Lane!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-10 08:08:04+00:00): Split Brownstone Law SEO spam POI details from building and cleaned up tags in changeset 183910044

https://osm.org/changeset/183910044
Minerva Nava (2025-04-17 11:19:31+00:00): I was waiting to see my contribution appear in the OsmAnd app, but I noticed that something I had added was removed. Specifically, the information about the Coop being on level 0 is no longer there. I’m just wondering why it was taken out, as I had checked it myself in person.
fayor (2025-04-17 12:47:20+00:00): Ciao, contribuisco quotidianamente all'aggiornamento della zona in cui vivo e cerco di mantenere una mappatura coerente e uniforme. La stragrande maggioranza deii negozi è a livello stradale, che è anche quello che un utente si aspetta di trovare. Ritengo perciò che sia superfluo confermare una informazione che è già implicita e naturale nel tipo di oggetto mappato. Tutti i POI a livello diverso sono mappati e controllati. 
Ho tolto level=0 perché lasciare quella informazione su un singolo POI, quando tutti gli altri non ce l'hanno, non sarebbe stato coerente e sinceramente sarebbe un lavoro inutile e non migliorativo aggiungerla a tutti gli altri.
 Puoi non essere o no d'accordo con me ma ti chiedo di rispettare la mia opinione, così come io rispetto le opinioni degli altri mappatori quando mi capita di confrontarmi con chi si occupa di mappare altre realtà. Grazie.

Automatic translation;

Hi, I contribute daily to the update of the area where I live and I try to maintain a consistent and uniform mapping. The vast majority of shops are at street level, which is also what a user expects to find. I therefore believe that it is superfluous to confirm information that is already implicit and natural in the type of mapped object. All POIs at different levels are mapped and checked. 
I removed level=0 because leaving that information on a single POI, when all the others do not have it, would not have been consistent and honestly it would be a useless and non-improving job to add it to all the others. 
You may or may not agree with me but I ask you to respect my opinion, just as I respect the opinions of other mappers when I happen to compare myself with those who deal with mapping other realities. Thank you.
Minerva Nava (2025-04-17 16:37:47+00:00): It’s not true that “Tutti i POI a livello diverso sono mappati e controllati.”. For example, the Hotel Gargallo isn’t only on the ground floor – it has rooms upstairs too. So saying the place is on the ground floor isn’t something that can just be assumed. If the level detail is missing, there's no way to tell whether it’s obvious or simply hasn’t been checked in person.

Also, I saw on your profile that an administrator once wrote to you: “You seem to be deleting tags that you ‘do not like’. This is not OK.” This seems like a similar case. If I add something that’s true and I’ve seen myself, please don’t remove it.

I hope not to see other edits of mine deleted in future. Thank you.

Translation:

Non è vero che “Tutti i POI a livello diverso sono mappati e controllati”. Ad esempio, l'Hotel Gargallo non si trova solo al piano terra, ma ha anche delle camere al piano superiore. Quindi, dire che il posto è al piano terra non è qualcosa che si può semplicemente presumere. Se manca il dettaglio del livello, non c'è modo di dire se è ovvio o semplicemente non è stato controllato di persona.

Inoltre, ho visto sul tuo profilo che una volta un amministratore ti ha scritto: “Sembra che tu stia cancellando i tag che 'non ti piacciono'. Questo non va bene”. Questo sembra un caso simile. Se aggiungo qualcosa che è vero e che ho visto io stesso, per favore non rimuovetelo.

Spero di non vedere altri miei edit cancellati in futuro. Grazie.
Drogowiec123 (2026-07-12 16:29:06+00:00): Cały pikietaż można by połączyć w relację.
aTarom (2025-04-12 15:06:21+00:00): Hola, no es correcto el name
Zona esportiva Municipal
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294730353/history
en vez de
"Campo de fútbol"?
No debemos añadir demás nombres descriptivos si ya tenemos tags que identifican los elementos, como "Gradas" si ya tenemos "leisure"="bleachers"
Saludos
Frans S (2025-05-06 07:55:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
The buildings mapped by you were mapped with Bing Imagery as background,
The instructions mention to use the ESRI imagery.
Quite a number of buildings need to be adjusted, mapped or placed on the correct footprint.
Most buildings have a regular pattern and square. please map accordingly and square the buildings.
Best regards and keep mapping
JochenOSM (2025-04-09 14:11:58+00:00): Hi. Steht da wirklich eine Sitzbank mitten im Weinberg? Oder war dein GPS ungenau, und das ist ein Duplikat von node 7570002699 (neben dem Weg eingezeichnet) ?
EnHa (2025-04-09 14:35:58+00:00): Danke für die Info, die Bank habe ich falsch eingetragen. LG
Dawid2849 (2026-01-11 11:58:39+00:00): Cześć, te prace wciąż trwają?
DwarfNebula_ (2025-04-08 16:29:11+00:00): Hi! Zou dit label niet aan de buurt Oog in Al moeten hangen? Ik zie dat je de naam van de subwijk ook hebt aangepast, terwijl deze meer buurten dan Oog in Al bevat.
A67-A67 (2025-04-08 17:25:34+00:00): Hoi, Ja op zich wel. Er lijken hier nu wel veel vreemd getagde wijken en/of buurten te ontstaan, zoals:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18959872
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18935922

Twee namen gescheiden door een komma hoort in ieder geval niet. Hebben dit soort verzamelingen van buurten eigenlijk wel een naam.
DwarfNebula_ (2025-04-08 17:56:50+00:00): Ja het is soms een beetje raar ingedeeld door de gemeente. Bijvoorbeeld de buurt Lombok bestaat niet, alleen Lombok-West en -Oost, welke samen met twee andere buurten onder de subwijk Lombok, Leidseweg vallen.

Eventueel zou de relatie dan wel die naam kunnen krijgen, maar pas ik de naam van het label aan naar een meer gangbare naam zonder komma?
DwarfNebula_ (2025-04-09 08:32:48+00:00): https://gu-geo.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/lookup/index.html?appid=c78039097b684223bcd12dce06f26f04

Zie hier trouwens een link naar de officiële kaart, was die even vergeten in mijn vorige reactie.
A67-A67 (2025-04-10 21:57:55+00:00): In de plaatsnodes zou ik sowieso alleen gebruikelijke namen aanhouden.

Met wijken en buurten zijn vaak lastig omdat er naast de gebruikelijke namen ook statistische indelingen zijn waarbij ongeveer even grote gebieden worden gecreëerd, die los staan van de gebruikelijke indeling.

In dit geval lijken vooral de subwijken verzamelingen van buurten te zijn. De wijken en buurten zijn dan het belangrijkst om te mappen.
A67-A67 (2025-04-10 21:59:59+00:00): Ik vraag me wel af hoe officieel de schrijfwijzen in de ArcGIS-omgeving zijn. De hoofdletters lijken bijvoorbeeld automatisch gegenereerd te zijn wat namen als "J.p. Coenstraat-Oost" en "Hoog Catharijne, Ns, Jaarbeurs" oplevert.
DwarfNebula_ (2025-04-11 08:51:56+00:00): Ah, dan zal ik daar wel onderscheid in gaan maken. Alleen de subwijk mappen als het daadwerkelijk ergens op slaat.

Kaartje is overigens te vinden vanaf de gemeente website (https://www.utrecht.nl/wonen-en-leven/wijken).

Ik zie nu alleen dat het overzicht met alle buurten (https://www.utrecht.nl/wonen-en-leven/wijken/indeling-wijken-en-buurten/buurt-bij-wijk) niet overeen komt met het eerder genoemde kaartje. Ook als je op de kaartjes klikt die bij iedere wijk pagina staan, komen deze niet overeen met het overzicht van buurten (bijv Lombok, Station e.o.).

Misschien maar eens goed om de gemeente even te mailen, om te vragen welke lijst/kaartjes nou kloppen.
ilias_ (2025-04-08 14:53:53+00:00): Hi nona mostafa,

That is a driveway, thank you for your collaboration.
ilias_ (2025-04-08 14:57:30+00:00): No worries, I fixed it
nona mostafa (2025-04-09 14:52:22+00:00): Hello, Ilias.
Thank you for your response; I am happy to connect with you. 
Regards,
nona mostafa
s777n (2025-04-08 15:51:50+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы продублировали теги магазина добавив их и на здании и на точку. Лучше магазин добавлять точкой. Удалил дублирующую информацию с здания.
silversurfer83 (2025-04-08 19:46:28+00:00): Hi :)

sieht ja prinzipiell ziemlich schick aus. Ich bin nur weiterhin nicht damit einverstanden alle "Stationen" als eigene building=hospital zu erfassen. In meinen Augen sollten das alles ein großes building=hospital sein und der Rest kann einfach building:part=yes im Gesamtumriss sein.

Hast du noch vor, das so zu ergänzen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164682482
SoGetThis41 (2025-04-09 14:15:39+00:00): Hallo,
bin bei der Umsetzung noch nicht ganz sicher, da ein Gebäüdeteil von C-Süd auf Layer=1 sitzt (wegen der Straße) und dann dass gesamte Gebäude auf dem Layer sitzten müsste. Folgt daraus dann nicht auch das alle Gebäudeteile mit Layer=1 getaggt werden müssten um sichtbar zu sein?

Danke für die Tips
silversurfer83 (2025-04-09 15:48:07+00:00): Hi

verstehe was du meinst. Sichtbar wäre es auch ohne passende layer tags. Layer ist ja auch nur dafür da um die relative Stapelung zweier übereinanderliegender Objekte zu erfassen. Du kannst also auch dem Abschnitt Weg, der durch das Gebäude geht ein layer <0 verpassen und die Stapelung wäre identisch. (erklärende Links am Ende). Die Gebäudedurchfahrt sollte sowieso auf die passende länge gezogen werden.

Wenn du dann das Gesamtgebäude konstruierts, achte bei dem Innehof drauf, dass du am Ende ein Multipolygon erzeugst und aus den vielen building=hospital wieder building:part=yes machst.

Bei Problemen einfach weiter Fragen. Falls es schnell gehen soll, guck in einer der diversen Chatgruppen.

happy mapping

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:multipolygon

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:layer
lankapuhelin (2025-04-11 14:40:53+00:00): Hei, tästä muutoksesta on tullut palautetta karttailmoituksen muodossa, missä kysytään perusteita tekemällesi muutokselle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4704033

Just in case in english: Hi, there has been feedback about this change in the form of a map notification asking for reasons for the change you made.
osmviborg (2025-04-08 14:55:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180528296 / https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333614281 ?
gscscnd (2025-04-09 07:52:26+00:00): Poproszę o wycofanie tej i powiązanych zmian. Ortofoto jest nieaktualne, w ostatnich latach/miesiącach został zlikwidowany środkowy pas, zamiast niego powstały pasy dla rowerów (już zaznaczone jako "cycleway:both"="lane").
IreuN (2025-04-09 16:30:20+00:00): Wycofano https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164733322
ezio_m (2025-04-09 10:40:04+00:00): hello, are you sure the position is correct? to my knowledge there are no "chalets" in Conegliano as it's in a plain, not in a mountain. Moreover there are no hotels in the vicinity. Also this is a duplicate of 12739148701
pwbriggs (2025-04-13 03:03:12+00:00): Thanks. I noticed you didn't add a name for this business, but the website you linked to inconsistently stylizes it both "net-tech" and "Net-Tech". Do you know the official name?

Thanks again, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
s777n (2025-04-08 15:52:20+00:00): Поправил имя.
kamasytrix (2025-04-08 16:37:06+00:00): Там щось змінилось?
Oleksii Cherniavskyi (2025-04-08 16:47:34+00:00): через ті рестрікшени, і також аксеси на фронтальній односторонці, які там були до змін - неможливо було із вулиці Решетилівської (рухаючиьсь на Схід), потрапити на вул. Петра Дорошенка (проїхавши під мостом)
kamasytrix (2025-04-08 18:55:18+00:00): а від кернела на решетилівську заборонено також?
kamasytrix (2025-04-08 18:56:27+00:00): https://ibb.co/d0c5WdF6 отак заборонено?
kamasytrix (2025-04-08 18:59:56+00:00): тобто з решетилівської на героїв пожежників можливо повернути по правилом тільки проїхавши під мостом?
Oleksii Cherniavskyi (2025-04-09 09:04:31+00:00): я не можу підтвердити на 100% достоврінсть turn restriction на цому перехресті (окрім даних з street view).  Головна причина цих правок - до їх внесення маршрути будувалися як показано на скріні (червоним), а точно повиннні будувтаися як показано зеленим
https://ibb.co/dwfm0zX7

якщо випевнені, що рестрікшени на цьому перехресті інакші, можете виправляти
dadavid (2025-05-06 00:17:14+00:00): Hi, du hattest hier mal den Namen "Festplatz und Naturbühne Rohrwald" eingetragen, das fand ich eigentlich ganz gut. Wenn du eine Kurzbezeichnung eintragen möchtest, kannst du das mit short_name=* tun, schaue dazu am besten ins Wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:short_name


Viele Grüße

David
bartgron (2025-08-26 18:33:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
eggie (2025-04-08 16:50:31+00:00): Dag Bas  Ik heb layer=-1 verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
dadavid (2025-05-06 00:10:43+00:00): Hi, die von dir hier hinzugefügte Halle existierte bereits in OSM und war mEn korrekt gemappt. Ich habe den von dir angegeben Namen "Kultur- und Sporthalle" als Alternativen Namen hinzugefügt und das von dir doppelt hinzugefügte Objekt entfernt. 

Bitte achte darauf, keine bereits existierenden Objekte hinzuzufügen :) 

Viele Grüße und happy mapping 

David
jmaspons (2025-04-09 07:45:26+00:00): Bon dia! No sé si era l'intenció, però en eliminar l'etiquera `area=yes`, els polígons de la Reserva de posidònia i l'àrea de fondeig deixen de ser poligons i només representen una línia. És això el què volies fer?
gabpr05 (2025-04-09 08:16:01+00:00): Bon dia! Me sembla que al que fas referencia donava problemes i tal vegada per aixo ho vaig eliminar donant-li a 'corregir', tot i que no estic segur. Fas referència al que ara possa 'Reserva de Posidonia'? (La badia principal d'entrada o acces a Cabrera). 

Salut!
NeisReview (2025-04-09 06:09:36+00:00): #NoTags

Hi, welcome to OSM.

I've reviewed your latest map edits and it seems that this changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
Kiss_Karoly (2025-04-08 17:13:23+00:00): Még ma javítom. Mindenki őrizze meg a hidegvérét. Akkor ezt tűnt a StreetComplettel a legegyszerűbbnek, és leggyorsabbnak.
Kiss_Karoly (2025-04-08 21:32:28+00:00): Javítva, kiegészítve.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-04-09 19:39:24+00:00): This changeset duplicated the features.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164685139
Nzau (2025-04-10 19:11:21+00:00): Salut Spaghetti Monster🍝,
Merci pour les corrections, je me suis trompé en voulant récupérer des infos que j'avais du revet.
S'il y a besoin de faire d'autres corrections fais moi signe,
Nzau

---
Hi Spaghetti Monster🍝,
Thanks for the corrections, I made a mistake trying to retrieve info I had from revet.
If there is a need to make other corrections let me know,
Nzau
hatul (2025-04-24 04:23:10+00:00): בבקשה לא לערוך שמות בשביל שימוש אישי

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165359277
The Polish (2025-04-09 19:14:38+00:00): Cześć, z jakiego powodu usunąłeś nazwę ulicy?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171923211
olo81 (2025-04-09 19:19:34+00:00): Dróg dojazdowych nie nazywamy
The Polish (2025-04-09 19:21:08+00:00): A co w przypadku gdy ona ma nadaną nazwę?
olo81 (2025-04-09 19:38:06+00:00): Jest przy tym kawałku tabliczka z nazwą?
The Polish (2025-04-09 19:49:14+00:00): Nie ma jeszcze tabliczki. Nazwa ulicy została nadana Uchwałą Rady Miejskiej w Sławkowie.
olo81 (2025-04-09 19:54:24+00:00): Teraz tak patrzę że to mój błąd. Z rozpędu skasowałem bo nazwa podobna do głównej drogi. To wycofania ta edycja.
The Polish (2025-04-09 20:12:55+00:00): Przywróciłem nazwę.
NeisReview (2025-04-09 06:14:25+00:00): #NodeDragging

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thank you for contributing to the map. I’ve reviewed your recent edits and noticed that at least one node of a way was moved. This can sometimes happen unintentionally, and it’s led to some unusual intersections or overlaps between street segments and other map elements.

Could you kindly confirm whether these changes were intentional or if they may have been made by mistake?

Thank you, and I look forward to your response!
---
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8337484383
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/896963101
blue_cancer<3 (2025-04-09 11:51:03+00:00): Hello there,

Thank you for reviewing my changes. I only intended to add a building area to any I found missing. It was not my intention to make any changes to the nodes, that was my mistake. I apologize for any inconveniences this may have caused.
Omnific (2025-04-08 18:13:52+00:00): Hi, please be careful about accidentally dragging nodes. The street got pulled a few hundred feet south. Also, when creating buildings, please use the "Q" button to make the corners square. Thanks!
NeisReview (2025-04-09 06:15:10+00:00): Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164692186
Lezurex (2025-04-08 17:47:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237820128
Hier hast du maxspeed=1 gemacht, ist ein Fehler, oder?
editing_user (2025-04-08 20:20:24+00:00): Ist ein Fehler sollte 15 kmh und nicht 1 kmh sein. wurde gefixed.
zuicz (2025-04-18 10:11:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16686399#map=17/52.251684/21.052723
hmmm
Anas masuris (2025-04-18 10:15:32+00:00): Podczas sklejania/cięcia torów, relacje do nich należące są modyfikowane. Ale to akurat nie ja ją dodałem xd

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16686399/history

Ja tylko się zajmowałem R6, RE6 i R60
zuicz (2025-04-18 11:05:42+00:00): wiem, zastanawia mnie co autor miał na myśli dodając to
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-08 16:21:22+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12739301980

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2025-04-08 18:46:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
DaveF (2025-04-10 18:28:12+00:00): The official ORR data classifies it as one station.
https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/statistics/usage/estimates-of-station-usage
There is no mention of ref:crs LSX

National Rail has no record of it:
https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/stations/LSX
小智智 (2025-04-10 18:46:03+00:00): LSX is the code used in the timetable data for the Elizabeth line station, this code can be found in the Network Rail data under the column crs_reference_code but it is not publicised.

Similarly for PDX (Paddington Crossrail), FDX (Farringdon Crossrail), SPL (St Pancras Low Level), etc. The existence of separate codes, along with separate entrances / concourses / gatelines or even operators for ground truth both confirm that they are two physical stations for operational purposes.
小智智 (2025-04-10 18:48:56+00:00): ORR derives the stations usage statistics from ticketing data, which do not separate PAD/PDX, STP/SPL, ZFD/FDX, LST/LSX, etc., because they are considered the same station in terms of rail ticketing, but operationally they are clearly two different stations (apart from Farringdon which is disputable) which can be easily verified as ground truth.
小智智 (2025-04-10 18:52:42+00:00): https://tfl.gov.uk/cdn/static/cms/documents/rfliccostpr2026v1.pdf

The timetable planning rules clearly lists the operational CRS codes for all the Elizabeth line CCOS stations - CRS codes exist for stations and also other places like depots, junctions, as seen in Network Rail data (which is open data), so the use of ref:crs is appropriate.
MikeN (2025-04-09 00:07:22+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Thank you for adding this curb detail; it looks good and it's the last major piece of the local sidewalk network.
Al Cholis (2025-05-31 09:00:20+00:00): BRI Tanjung 1 sudah pindah ke sebelah timur dari [way] yang dimaksud, sekarang jadi toko bangunan (kalau tidak salah)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-26 13:42:59+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9465064121/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit
how something exist and have width=0?
s777n (2025-04-08 19:24:08+00:00): Здравствуйте. Удалил вашу правку. Вы нарисовали еще одну дорогу поверх уже сцществующей дороги.
MapSpot (2025-04-14 15:22:58+00:00): When tagging gardens, please consider using access=private (or ownership=private) instead of private=yes. This tag is not valid and not recognized by any data consumers. More info can be found on the wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:private

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate
Frans S (2025-04-13 11:01:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. Rather accurate. However, High buildings (you see a large shadow) shows also the sidewalls. Just map over the rooflines and move the whole to its footprint. (where the sidewall meets the ground)
Best regards
borishag (2025-04-09 08:26:15+00:00): Landnaam en provincienaam worden toch automatisch gegenereerd, waarom dan toch noemen in individuele nodes?
borishag (2025-04-14 10:51:00+00:00): @Joost Schouppe en @Dentonny Ook hier waarom landnaam en provincie vermelden als het automatisch gegenereerd wordt?
dentonny (2025-04-26 20:24:13+00:00): inderdaad, deze hebben we gemist. Ik draai deze zo meteen ook terug
dentonny (2025-04-26 22:00:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165484133
fortera_au (2025-04-10 13:09:32+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/17536
fortera_au (2025-04-10 22:17:56+00:00): Reverted by DWG

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164789826
Aetolia (2025-04-21 04:04:01+00:00): Lake Gistova is part of Greece also cutting parts of Greece and incorporating them in Albania is not legal. Any doubts on this check the International agreements between the borders of Greece  and Albania the  Protocol of Florence . Also sentinel 2 satellite images that cannot be altered show reality on the ground.
jhuang97 (2025-04-08 19:48:48+00:00): Hello. Can you explain why you deleted the grass areas over the engineering quad and some of the building parts inside the Engineering Sciences Building and Superconductivity Center?
jhuang97 (2025-04-08 19:59:22+00:00): There is precedent for mapping individual grass areas inside a park area.  For example, the grass area named East Green inside Central Park in New York City.
jhuang97 (2025-04-08 20:00:43+00:00): Building parts do not show up on the default openstreetmap.org view, but they can be used to describe the 3D shape of a building, which can be seen on 3D map viewers like F4 map.
seateaeye (2025-04-08 20:10:07+00:00): Thanks for letting me know about these. I thought these were redundant since there was not grass (or i didnt see it) on the north quad, but I will keep this in mind in the future. I will revert these when I have access to my computer.
jhuang97 (2025-04-09 01:54:16+00:00): Thanks.
citrula (2025-04-08 20:55:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. This change looks good to me.