piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
pitfire (2024-03-24 13:13:19+00:00): Hi surfsiderNRW,
bis Du sicher, dass Laurentiusweg (1263252166) & Weg: 1263252165 dem Kriterium "highway=service" entsprechen ? Es ist wohl eher "highway=path" oder "highway = track". Für schmale Wege, die nicht zum Befahren durch zweispurige Fahrzeuge vorgesehen sind, wird highway=path verwendet.
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-03-22 00:26:01+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 148957573, 148957725.
MxxCon (2024-03-26 01:05:12+00:00): Looking at the satellite imagery it seems like there is a turning lane. Is that not the case?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148990885
TheBestIdea (2024-03-26 01:10:23+00:00): Correct, it was changed to one lane in the last two months when the block of Schermerhorn to the west was converted to one way east bound.
wolfy1339 (2024-03-22 01:08:35+00:00): Wrong changeset number, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144844045 is the reverted changeset
Lino Mario Cabrera (2024-03-27 10:34:05+00:00): Estés arenales es de RosaPata por empieza en RosaPata y históricamente es de RosaPata
Glassman (2024-03-22 16:39:38+00:00): This area is already tagged as the Riverview Bible Camp.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148991716
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-22 18:20:39+00:00): Why you think this place was actually renamed ?

( see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/911293/history )
iandees (2024-03-22 02:42:20+00:00): Reverted due to fake edits and/or spam

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148992514
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:24:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174064933 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18849
pitscheplatsch (2024-03-23 15:11:06+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149055097
Supaplex (2024-03-22 12:47:53+00:00): 50年代咖啡館
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-22 06:52:39+00:00): Do not partially overlap areas, such as the green and fiarway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148994419
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-22 06:52:40+00:00): Do not partially overlap areas, such as the green and fiarway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148994419
Rostaman521 (2024-03-22 04:55:44+00:00): donedavno = prije 10-ak godina, dakle dio između Maksimirskog naselja II. i Blizneca
giorgio92 (2024-03-27 09:04:53+00:00): Ciao, ti confermo che tutte le sagome degli edifici sono controllate prima di accettarle
Xvtn (2024-03-22 14:19:27+00:00): Yep, it's showing up! Looks good.
SomeoneElse (2024-03-23 11:15:53+00:00): The value here previously was "multi;q".  That obviously means that the user meant "sport=multi" but also that they meant to square the rectangle.  Did you manually square these rectangles?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-23 18:46:52+00:00): >  Did you manually square these rectangles? 

no, as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/fix_many_obvious_typos only tags replacements are done

I was looking into various reasons for this tags appearing but I have not realised how q suffix may be appearing. 

I will think how to handle previous values and future cases like this. If rate is low maybe I can just manually square new ones. Maybe try writing changeset comments where this happened?

I will look in attic data where I applied edit like this and square them when applicable. Will write here when I will do this or progress on this.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-26 14:54:05+00:00): I added special handling to my typo detector to skip and ignore such cases (no immediate effects, has effect on future proposed edits or manual cleanup)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-26 15:08:06+00:00): Also started reviewing potentially affected, looks like most or all are pitches.

I have removed the from code of approved bot (this comment has not appeared at all previously in this discussion or any previous one if I remember right) and I started thinking about best way to detect and review affected objects.

Currently identified transformations are all in sport key:

                'multi;q': 'multi',
                'soccer;q': 'soccer',
                'tennis;q': 'tennis',
                'padel;q': 'padel',
                'rugby_union;q': 'rugby_union',
                'ice_hockey;q': 'ice_hockey',
                'basketball;q': 'basketball',
                'futsal;q': 'futsal',
                'bowls;q': 'bowls',
                'athletics;q': 'athletics',
                'equestrian;q': 'equestrian',
                'american_football;q': 'american_football',
                'paintball;q': 'paintball',
                'boules;q': 'boules',
                'volleyball;q': 'volleyball',
                'swimming;q': 'swimming',
                'baseball;q': 'baseball',
                'handball;q': 'handball',
                'soccerq': 'soccer',
                'athleticsq': 'athletics',
                'padelqq': 'padel',
                'multiq': 'multi',
                'padelq': 'padel',
                'soccerQ': 'soccer',
                'swimmingq': 'swimming',
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-26 15:09:28+00:00): Also, I reviewed proposed future edit where I asked about some of similar values in changeset comments. I removed such values from planned future bot edit.

(PS if you prefer less info let me know, I can post less detailed updates)
Something B (2025-11-27 14:30:25+00:00): I think that geometry is different issue, but as possible solution, fixme=square may be added.
NeisBot (2024-03-24 12:40:40+00:00): Hello Harsha1999, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
Xvtn (2024-03-22 14:17:29+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your change here. Things generally look good, but here are a couple of suggestions:
- Features such as roads and paths should generally be connected if someone could move from one to another. In this case, that means connecting the path to the road.
- The name tag should only be used for the common name of something, not to describe the feature. So for this trail, there probably should be no name. (highway=path already shows that it's a path.)
Let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for your contributions!
Xvtn (2024-03-22 14:17:47+00:00): 您好，欢迎来到 OpenStreetMap！ 由于您请求审核，我在这里查看了您的更改。 总的来说，事情看起来不错，但这里有一些建议：
- 如果有人可以从一个要素移动到另一个要素，则通常应该将道路和小径等要素连接起来。 在这种情况下，这意味着将路径连接到道路。
- 名称标签只能用于某事物的通用名称，而不是描述该功能。 所以对于这条小路来说，可能应该没有名字。 （highway=path 已经表明它是一条路径。）
如果您有任何疑问，请告诉我，感谢您的贡献！ （机器翻译）
avinet_ua (2024-04-05 21:09:19+00:00): stop deletion of uk translation!
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-22 13:05:58+00:00): Здравствуйте.
То что Вы вносите в качестве названия дороги, названием не является. Пожалуйста, почистите за собой тег name у дорог.
Владимир Новые Ключи (2024-04-18 05:41:58+00:00): Добрый день, Алексей. Будьте добры откройте мне доступ, нужно откорректировать правильно дороги . Согласно постановлению главы администрации сельского поселения Новые Ключи от 03.12.2018г. № 105 дорога называется: "Автомобильная дорога Самара-Бугуруслан-Березняки-Новые Ключи до водозабора №2".
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-04-18 07:20:31+00:00): Добрый день.
Доступ у Вас есть.
В тег name заносится (цитата) "Основное название объекта. Обычно то, как это называют люди, а не полное юридическое наименование."
Для упомянутого названия подойдёт тег official_name.
Пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
tordans (2024-03-25 14:20:35+00:00): Hallo ADFC-BB-Wentus, ich habe an dieser Stelle https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149133656#map=18/53.06930/12.54812&layers=N eine Änderung gemacht. Du hattest hier die L18 gesplittet vor der Kreuzung … aber an dieser Split-Stelle konnte man nicht mit dem Rad auf die Straße wechseln. Dass der Radweg hier so abbiegt macht die Stelle kompliziert zu mappen, aber ich glaube es ist besser, wenn wir an der Kreuzung splitten. Viele Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148996590
tordans (2024-03-25 14:16:10+00:00): Hallo JonasStrDe, du hast ein paar Tag an diesem Objekt übrig gelassen, bspw. "brand=burgerme" und "brand:wikidata" und payment. Was war deine Intention beim Mappen, wollest du Geschäfts ganz löschen? Ist dort etwas neues? 
Viele Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148996622
JonasStrDE (2024-03-25 18:39:41+00:00): Hallo, das war meine erste Aktivität und ich wusste nicht genau wie ich es richtig mache. Ich wollte den gesamten Laden löschen, da er pleite gegangen ist.
Glassman (2024-07-25 21:09:50+00:00): The DWG received a complaint from the BC Archaeology Branch, about mapping archaeological sites in BC. One of the sites mapped is a sensitive burial cairn site. The provided this document which describes the access to their information. https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/zKrGCxt6RZtBQss. If the sites you added are not publically know, can you please delete them. Please let me know so I can respond their request.
eerib (2024-07-25 22:59:18+00:00): Hello Glassman,

Information regarding this site was obtained through local knowledge and inference from signage and barriers in the area, and not by access to the Archeological Branch's restricted access database.

Further, the site and other archeological details in this area are mentioned in the following two publicly accessible documents:

- Garden Bay Provincial Park Management Plan (1992)

https://nrs.objectstore.gov.bc.ca/kuwyyf/garden_bay_marine_pa_mp_19921120_de77caa0ec.pdf

- A New Style of Glass Bead from Garden Bay, British Columbia (DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.23531.03360)

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313887703_A_New_Style_of_Glass_Bead_from_Garden_Bay_British_Columbia

I can understand that having the archeological sites in the database can result in desecration of the sites. 

On the flip side, I can also see users having a greater respect of the area due to a greater understanding of the historical significance of the area.

There is also a concern that the secrecy in archeological sites is resulting in secrecy in land use and management decisions.

I could not find a formal policy about archeological sites on the OpenStreetMap wiki, other than a short informal discouraging sentence. Perhaps changing the "name=DjSa-3" to "ref:borden=DjSa-3" and removing the "historic=archaeological_site" tag would help. The combination of these two changes should preserve the data within the database but remove the sites from consumer renderers. I will leave it with the DWG to determine what steps should be taken.

Thank you, eerib
mgerken (2024-03-22 11:41:30+00:00): Moin,

ist das Absicht, dass du bei einigen Wegen hier den letzten Node ersetzt hast? Die hatten vorher einen noexit=yes gesetzt, jetzt haben sie dies nicht mehr und der Node wurde gelöscht und neu angelegt (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/665150286/history ). Ich finde das beides eher ungünstig, da dadurch die Historie und Infos verloren gehen.
Beste Grüße
bison166 (2024-03-22 12:00:40+00:00): moin, dann mach es bitte rückgängig, danke
bison166 (2024-03-22 13:28:11+00:00): revertet
mgerken (2024-03-22 11:37:21+00:00): Moin,

wenn ich mir die Stelle auf den ESRI Bildern anschaue ist der Pfad zur Tür genau da wo er eingetragen war. Auf den Bing Bildern ist dies wegen Schatten und Vegetation nicht wirklich zu erkennen. Warst du zusätzlich vor Ort? Das ist ja durchaus relevant um die richtige Einfahrt zu treffen, um das Gebäude zu erreichen.

Beste Grüße
bison166 (2024-03-22 12:02:36+00:00): moin, dann mach das bitte rückgängig.  Danke
bison166 (2024-03-22 13:19:44+00:00): revertet
seeergiofdez (2024-03-22 20:13:21+00:00): Thanks for your contributions!
Please, be aware of relations and public transport lines when splitting or joining ways of a highway...
I fixed "Bus L1" line already
Anton Kasheuski (2024-03-25 08:36:36+00:00): Hi, serrgiofdezz!
Thank you for your feedback and for helping with the "Bus L1" line. I appreciate the guidance and will be more mindful of relations and public transport lines in future edits.
gs3§zba (2024-03-23 07:12:00+00:00): Hallo Chadwick100, wo hast du die Straßennamen her, die du an vielen Stellen ergänzt hast?
pyram (2024-12-08 19:35:58+00:00): Das hatte ich auch schon gefragt ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151680231 ), aber keine Antwort erhalten.
Wenn keine Antwort kommt, dann wird wohl eine Meldung an die DWG folgen müssen :-(
gs3§zba (2024-12-10 14:35:38+00:00): Hallo pyram, diese Diskussion sollte Chadwick100 eigentlich mitbekommen. Wenn keine Antwort kommt, sollte eine Meldung an die DWG erfolgen. Noch ein paar Tage warten, dann würde ich es begrüßen, wenn du die Meldung übernehmen könntest.
aTarom (2024-03-22 18:34:02+00:00): Hola, cuando puedas mira este house number
"addr:housenumber"="201https://joaquimsantalo.com/"
gracias por editar, disculpa brevedad, saludos
pantufla (2024-03-23 12:09:06+00:00): Ups, error mío. Ya lo corregí. Gracias por estar pendiente siempre.
eggie (2024-03-22 07:58:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Paden die verdwenen zijn kunnen uiteraard weg.
Verdwijnende paden die geblokkeerd zijn door takkenbossen halen we niet wegmaar taggen we als disused:highway=path  Dit voorkomt opnieuw intekenen.
Paden die zijn afgesloten middels een bordje en/of hek zetten we op access=no

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-03-22 08:04:24+00:00): Dit pad had dus beter niet verwijderd kunnen worden, want het staat als pad in de BGT en is duidelijk op luchtfoto's te zien. De kans op opnieuw intekenen is aanwezig.
Beter dus taggen als disused:highway=path   Ook dan zie je het pad niet op de kaart, maar wel in de editor.
Roger Palmen (2024-03-22 08:06:00+00:00): Het pad is echt weggehaald, hekje verwijderd, hek doorgetrokken, enkele bomen omgezaagd en aan de uiteinden over ongeveer 50 meter omgeploegd. Ik had inderdaad gezien dat disused of closed van toepassing zou zijn, maar dit pad is echt verwijderd.
eggie (2024-03-22 08:07:48+00:00): Verder loopt de afrastering tot 2x toe over de MTB Teerose Trail.
Roger Palmen (2024-03-22 08:09:19+00:00): Op 1 maart ontdekt, toen was het pas recent verwijderd. Zal dus ook nog even duren voor het op de foto's is terug te zien.
Roger Palmen (2024-03-22 08:11:50+00:00): Ff opgezocht waar BGT voor staat. Dat staatsbosbeheer / gelders landschap de BGT wellicht niet bijwerkt is dan weer een ander punt. Maar we gaan het zien...
eggie (2024-03-22 08:14:31+00:00): Wellicht voor de volgende keer om eerst disused:highway te gebruiken.
Weg is weg en dat is de werkelijkheid. 
Maar dat opnieuw intekenen is hardnekkig vandaar mijn tip. 
Er worden momenteel veel paden en wissels afgesloten wegens de toenemende drukte in het gebied. 
Mapse,
eggie
Roger Palmen (2024-03-22 08:17:04+00:00): Over de afrastering: op de plek van het verwijderde pad liep de afrastering voorheen ook al over de MTB route. Die MTB route is zowieso verlegd maar ik ken de details niet dus kan die ook niet zomaar aanpassen.
Roger Palmen (2024-03-22 08:18:02+00:00): In ieder geval bedankt voor de tip. Ik zal het in de gaten houden en volgende keer wellicht anders doen.
Thanks voor het moderaten!
eggie (2024-03-22 08:23:51+00:00): Oke... 'k Zal een opmerking op de kaart zetten. Dan pikt wellicht een MTB routemapper het op.
eggie (2024-03-22 08:26:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4162769
Mathias_ADAV (2024-09-04 10:36:26+00:00): Bonjour,

si il y-a un panneau voie verte, vous pouvez suivre les indication du wiki à savoir : ajouter
bicycle = designated+ foot = designated + trafic_sign = FR:C115

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voies_vertes

Bon mapping !
Mathias
joost schouppe (2024-10-18 09:36:39+00:00): Are you sure this is an emergency ward entrance? See note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4483420
guerda (2024-10-19 11:16:36+00:00): You are right, not sure what I selected wrong there. I think this is a service entry, but I have to check
guerda (2024-10-19 13:17:30+00:00): Thanks for catching this. I corrected it to main entrance.
alexey_zakharenkov (2024-03-22 11:39:52+00:00): Зачем вы удалили ЖК "Культура клуб"? Верните, пожалуйста.
Piskvor (2024-03-22 10:45:46+00:00): If it's more of an agricultural track, then it would be better to tag it as such (highway=track, tracktype=... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype ). That way, it's allowed for pretty much anyone.

Tagging "this is a pedestrian road that bicycles are also legally (bicycle=yes) permitted to use" is something quite diffferent, e.g. this: https://mapy.cz/zakladni?pano=1&q=ruzynska&source=stre&id=119552&pid=96206140&newest=1&yaw=0.842&fov=1.468&pitch=0.340&x=14.3211709&y=50.0813739&ds=2&z=16&ovl=8

The expectation of highway=footway,bicycle=yes is "paved, separated from motorized traffic." highway=track is, without other tagging, "unpaved, free-for-all".

Retagged this.
Eino81 (2024-03-22 11:13:02+00:00): I did not want to update that to.an agricultural road, because the southern end at the bike road is not fit for cars. It is like a wide path rather... I did not see any cars entering to that "road". Hard to categorize...
Piskvor (2024-03-22 11:39:21+00:00): Updated the southern end to path. If the character of the way changes, it's okay to split the way and make different changes to each new part.
Eino81 (2024-03-22 11:44:09+00:00): Thx, it is better now.
gendy54 (2024-12-31 22:17:26+00:00): Bonjour,

Différence entre le nom et le nom dans la BAN: https://bano.openstreetmap.fr/pifometre/pifomap.html?insee=54280&ratio=no#map=18.18/49.231549/6.009473
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
woodpeck_repair (2024-03-25 14:11:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 149133261 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import/update of parking tags, DWG ticket #2024032510000269
Strubbl (2024-03-24 16:56:52+00:00): Hi Polffw, arbeitest du für den Tourismusverband Rügen?
Polffw (2024-03-25 08:41:59+00:00): Guten Tag, ganz konkret bei der Baltic Project GmbH. in Auftrag sozusagen
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-22 14:29:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144557484/history has shop = homewares that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=homewares ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=houseware ? If yes, what is the difference? Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?
impvan (2024-10-22 14:54:54+00:00): Hi Mateusz,
I intentionally used the value 'homewares'.  Referring to the OSM description for houseware suggests products of a practical nature ~ cookware etc.
Homewares (in the UK at least) refers to more casual goods, usually of a decorative nature such as cushions, simple pictures, scented candles, ornaments, etc.  The sort of goods that get thrown away after a few years as fashions change :-(
Having recently visited Romania and seeing a trend towards the same sort of shop there too, I feel it might well be worth considering 'housewares' as a distinct key value.  An alternative might be 'fancy_goods', but I think that is probably a very BritishEnglish term and unlikely to be more widely understood.
As a comparison, there is another business close to this one (50m NE) called "Evans Bros" - that is most definitely 'houseware' according to the existing definition: everyhting from nails and glue, to cooking pots, hand tools, trash cans, gardening sundries, wine glasses, paraffin, paint, toys and cylinder gases..... if they haven;t got it, it probably doesn't exist!