piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-03-23 05:33:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13670760741 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Roofing service"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-31 10:33:05+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180356680
stragu (2026-03-23 06:29:43+00:00): Thanks! I did more as I had surveyed the area, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180285330 (and the fixing of the conflicting edits in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180285431)
iandees (2026-03-23 08:06:15+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on way/690496836 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.
InsertUser (2026-03-25 10:52:22+00:00): This appears to be surrounded by land. If it's surrounded by land it isn't a blue hole.
MappingMore (2026-03-29 03:35:21+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180565517
JakubS (2026-03-23 13:43:37+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie zmieniłeś drogę na ścieżkę? Ortofoto z geoportalu nadal wyraźnie pokazuje drogę polną (choć nie lepszą niż tracktype=grade5).
Która to nawigacja pokazuje w tym miejscu, żeby jeździć po polu zamiast po głównych drogach? Zmienianie tagowania drogi polnej z track na path tylko dlatego, żeby jakaś nawigacja tam nie prowadziła nie ma sensu, od zdefiniowania jakości lub dostępności drogi są inne tagi: tracktype, surface, smoothness czy access.
JakubS (2026-03-23 13:43:43+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie zmieniłeś drogę na ścieżkę? Ortofoto z geoportalu nadal wyraźnie pokazuje drogę polną (choć nie lepszą niż tracktype=grade5).
Która to nawigacja pokazuje w tym miejscu, żeby jeździć po polu zamiast po głównych drogach? Zmienianie tagowania drogi polnej z track na path tylko dlatego, żeby jakaś nawigacja tam nie prowadziła nie ma sensu, od zdefiniowania jakości lub dostępności drogi są inne tagi: tracktype, surface, smoothness czy access.
iandees (2026-03-23 08:06:31+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1479300809 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180289953, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
0xb7767000 (2026-03-23 08:46:47+00:00): Danke fürs aufräumen meiner alten Hinweise! Eine Ergänzung zu den Zahlen, die sich in meinen Hinweisen auf building:levels und roof:levels beziehen. Die erste Zahl ist immer building:levels die zweite roof:levels, 4/3 hipped wäre also building:levels=4 + roof:levels=3 + roof:shape=hipped

Wenn du willst kannst du das noch ergänzen, ansonsten würde ich das heute abend noch nachholen
RobotFK (2026-03-23 10:39:48+00:00): Hi, 
Ich habe Stockwerke und Dachformen eingetragen, war mir aber mit dem Kontext für die Dachstockwerke nicht sicher, du kannst das gerne noch später nachfüllen. 
Danke für deine Arbeit :)
eggie (2026-03-23 07:55:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Probeer als het kan op de adresnode bij te taggen. Ik heb het aangepast.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Pikse (2026-03-30 15:00:12+00:00): Please don't move historical names from old_name:de to name:de

See recent discussion about such names: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/whats-everyones-problem-with-name-de/142456

Neither is the use of this exonym recommended in Polish language these days (see here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179825956)
Bienson (2026-03-24 01:52:08+00:00): Nun übereinanderliegende Blumenbeet- und Garten-Fläche, beides Multipolygone trotz einfach Flächenform
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-25 19:05:20+00:00): berechtigt.
spreaderman (2026-04-04 02:27:00+00:00): If the ski area is permanently closed

It should be kept in OSM but tagged properly, for example:

disused=landuse=winter_sports
or
landuse=winter_sports + disused=yes
or
abandoned:winter_sports=yes

This preserves history and avoids breaking references.
DrSegatron (2026-03-29 17:35:28+00:00): Dublett med 12925512586.
Marcus Lundblad (2026-03-30 19:52:09+00:00): Bra catch!

Tagit bort dubbletten nu.

Hade missat detta p.g.a. att store=variety_shop inte verkar renderas i vår vector-tile-generator som vi använder för GNOME Maps

https://github.com/jameswestman/planetiler-openmaptiles

det är en fork från
https://github.com/openmaptiles/planetiler-openmaptiles

Får väl ta och försöka om jag kan få in en patch för det upstream (alternativt i vår fork).
YomanNH (2026-03-25 07:15:02+00:00): Hej, zauważyłem problem z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1491010065 - zmapowałeś to jako obszar zadrzewiony, a jednocześnie pokrywa się on z obszarem trawiastym https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235962350. A zauważyłem to dlatego, że osmose (https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/pl/map/#loc=17/50.060746/20.042395&item=xxxx&level=1%2C2%2C3) pokazało w tym miejscu zduplikowane węzły.
michalgy (2026-03-30 13:15:28+00:00): Cześć, już sprawdzam - tam większość węzłów z tego co pamiętam była poplątana jak edytowałem, postaram się to jakoś podzielić. Dzięki za przypomnienie bo prawie o tym zapomniałem
michalgy (2026-03-30 13:35:25+00:00): Wrzuciłem zmianę - do weryfikacji https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180630694
YomanNH (2026-03-31 09:09:57+00:00): Dzięki za poprawki!

Obszary chyba nie nachodzą na siebie, ale nadal jest problem ze zduplikowanymi węzłami, czyli tym, co pokazuje się na osmose. Przykładowo węzeł https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13671007835 należący do obszaru drzewiastego i węzeł https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13691561285 należący do obszaru zarośli są dokładnie w tym samym miejscu. Takie węzły powinny być połączone w jeden. Takich przypadków jest 20-30, według tego co pokazuje osmose. Fajnie, jakbyś połączył te węzły będące granicami między drzewami a zaroślami.

Na wszelki wypadek dodam ważną informacje na przyszłość, bo spotykałem się z tym problemem w różnych miejscach - obszarów nie łączymy z drogami. U Ciebie chyba ten problem nie wystąpił, piszę na wszelki wypadek ;)
eggie (2026-03-23 08:16:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Volgens de BGT loopt de Beerzeloop goed, maar wijkt erg af van het watervlak natural=water

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-23 08:34:25+00:00): Watervlak consistent gemaakt aan waterloop.
eggie (2026-03-23 10:02:42+00:00): Is de naam niet gewoon Beerze?
rodolfovargas (2026-03-23 14:29:06+00:00): Buenos aportes. Considere que el dato de TIPO DE VIVIENDA necesita ser obtenido en campo, en el lugar. Continua aportando a OSM : )
rskedgell (2026-03-23 08:43:41+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding this. For a memorial bench, you might also find adding historic=memorial + memorial=bench helpful to capture details of the person commemorated.
Taya_S (2026-03-24 16:15:20+00:00): This shop appears to have been placed in the middle of the road.
IvaKraljić (2026-03-27 16:02:59+00:00): The wrong weight restriction tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180510158. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-03-27 16:04:37+00:00): The wrong weight restriction tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180510208. #OptimoRoute
srbrook (2026-03-23 13:37:52+00:00): Has GSF taken over Bromsgrove Motor Factors? In which case the tags on this node should be applied to the building way 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266741787 and the node you created should be deleted.
Nikhil kotiya (2026-03-24 11:36:27+00:00): Yes
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:27:11+00:00): Revert of 180290945
IvaKraljić (2026-03-27 16:07:05+00:00): The wrong tags have since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180510344. #OptimoRoute
habi (2026-03-23 08:47:08+00:00): Koorektur: Alle *in der Schweiz* in OSM erfassten Derendingers homogenisiert
rajdhani (2026-03-24 10:18:14+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:180345428
eggie (2026-03-23 09:01:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Probeer direct op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen.
Ik heb de info samengevoegd.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
IvaKraljić (2026-03-27 16:15:35+00:00): The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180510738. #OptimoRoute
kubahahaha (2026-03-24 09:07:20+00:00): Z jakiej ty nawigacji korzystasz? Od tego czy można jeździć są tagi access=*
eggie (2026-03-23 09:33:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback   Let op dat je paden niet aan de landuse vastmaakt. Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=180292251
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Lars Kol (2026-03-23 09:58:31+00:00): Thanks, heb het aangepast
eggie (2026-03-23 10:00:45+00:00): Oke.. trucje bij iD is om de linkeralttoets te gebruiken bij intekenen. Dat voorkomt plakken.
Mapse
m_fuhrmann (2026-03-23 10:05:29+00:00): Hi! Nur mal zwecks Verständnis. Was genau hat sich an den POIs hier geändert?
Wenn z.B. den Bike Shop oder das Furnier Ding in der aktuellen und vorherigen Version anschaue, sehe ich gar keinen Unterschied?

Danke für die Info :hugging_face:
thetornado76 (2026-03-23 15:03:25+00:00): Hi
Ich habe die Öffnungszeiten von den deutschen Abkürzungen zu den  englischen So -> Su geändert.
m_fuhrmann (2026-03-23 15:22:51+00:00): Ah! Sorry, das hätte ich sehen können. Mein Fehler. Vielen Dank!
bartgron (2026-03-23 09:13:21+00:00): Przez pomyłkę dałem zły opis, powinno być "znaczniki"
Carto75 (2026-03-23 10:06:18+00:00): Bonjour,
en créant une zone de jardin public, vous avez ajouté une partie privative et des terrains de sport, je ne pense pas que ce soit pertinent.
NeisBot (2026-03-23 09:24:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13671219845 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mens Clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-31 10:33:08+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180666017
(Delete spam tags. First version)
NeisBot (2026-03-23 09:27:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13671210172 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Tattoo studio"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-31 10:33:11+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/180294100
marc__marc (2026-03-24 11:06:25+00:00): Bonjour,
le numéro de téléphone est invalide (un chiffre de trop pour un format valide).
pourrais-tu aussi bouger le magasin au bon endroit ou ajouter le bâtiment manquant car je suppose que le magasin n'est pas en plein air
Cordialement,
Marc
IvaKraljić (2026-03-23 09:35:33+00:00): The unnecessarily created node has since been deleted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180294254. #OptimoRoute
IvaKraljić (2026-03-27 16:20:08+00:00): Additional segment has since been tagged in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180510948#map=19/42.735107/-73.782362. #OptimoRoute
NeisBot (2026-03-23 09:30:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/34694527 v18 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1330592245 v2 | 3 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=180293724
iandees (2026-03-23 12:33:47+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12311441170 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180303552, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
hlfan (2026-03-28 18:02:16+00:00): basemap.at hat hier jedoch die Lage falsch. Die Krümmungen passen zB gar nicht zu dieser Form. Gehört mMn zurückgesetzt, bei der vorherigen Form hat das wenigstens passender ausgesehen.
Taya_S (2026-03-23 09:46:59+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180294853
IvaKraljić (2026-03-27 16:22:08+00:00): The wrong weight restriction tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180511059. #OptimoRoute
MaliMrav (2026-03-24 09:03:11+00:00): Само да проверим: да ли је „Кроз добра пекара” грешка?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3479579978
Taya_S (2026-03-23 09:46:44+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180294853
Taya_S (2026-03-23 09:46:25+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180294853
BC168 (2026-03-23 19:36:57+00:00): Moin. Ist das wirklich ein Einfamilienhaus (building=house)? Auf den Luftbildern sieht das eher so aus, als wäre das ein Mehrfamilienhaus mit mindestens 6 Wohnungen. Das wäre dann building=apartments.
Simon Koch97 (2026-03-24 08:21:34+00:00): Hab versehentlich geändert. Ist wahrscheinlich kein Einfamilienhaus
BC168 (2026-03-25 02:49:55+00:00): Ok - ich setz das dann auf "Wohnhaus" allgemein, das stimmt auf jeden Fall.

Danke für die Rückmeldung. Und wenn du Interesse hast, dann kannst du dir mal die interaktive Einführung in den iD-Editor angucken (Hilfe → Rundgang starten).
NeisBot (2026-03-23 09:39:44+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13671297608 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plumbing company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-31 10:33:15+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180666023
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
arjunaraoc (2026-03-27 01:56:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Deleted by the creator
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180294440
rajdhani (2026-03-24 09:42:07+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180343647
arjunaraoc (2026-03-27 01:52:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180294644
mueschel (2026-03-24 10:48:15+00:00): Hi,
please check the buildings you imported here.

- the tag "evacuation_centre= true / false" is not documented. The usual tag is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aemergency%3Asocial_facility%3Dshelter

- don't add coordinates as tags. Objects already have coordinates, there is no need for additional tags.
IvaKraljić (2026-03-27 16:28:13+00:00): The wrong weight restriction tags have since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180511389. #OptimoRoute
arjunaraoc (2026-03-27 01:51:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180295122
IvaKraljić (2026-03-27 16:30:34+00:00): The wrong weight restriction tags have since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180511474. #OptimoRoute
arjunaraoc (2026-03-27 01:50:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my updates for all your edits. example:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180481679#map=15/16.18608/81.16807
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180295422
arjunaraoc (2026-03-26 01:40:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180433051
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180295529
MappingMore (2026-03-25 11:41:22+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180402937
Fizzie-DWG (2026-05-09 04:46:19+00:00): DWG revert - poor quality mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182408509
NeisBot (2026-03-23 10:15:45+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/way/1395288127 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Second hand shop"
---
Örneğin metnin daha tarafsız ve gerçek bir versiyonu şöyle olabilir: "İkinci el mağazası"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-03-31 10:33:17+00:00): 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180472479
arjunaraoc (2026-03-26 01:37:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180296281
arjunaraoc (2026-03-26 01:36:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180432992
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180296306
arjunaraoc (2026-03-26 01:30:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).  Make your comment reflect your edit
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180296470
Manuele R (2026-04-11 11:39:58+00:00): Why did you delete my ads for Castione-Arbedo? Platform 4 is under construction and will be ready in December 2026
Piagno (2026-04-11 12:56:20+00:00): ciao manuele
I misidentified the tracks as old razed ones. Since they weren't visible on aerial imagery at all, I deleted them.
If I would have identified them as 'under construction' I would have left them as they are
Piagno (2026-04-11 12:57:05+00:00): are you able to readd them? or should I try to do a partial revert of my changeset?
Manuele R (2026-04-11 14:34:44+00:00): I can do it next week... But if you have time you can do it ;-)
Piagno (2026-04-11 17:20:23+00:00): i added it with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181200284
Henry572 (2026-03-24 10:26:23+00:00): Hallo Joern,
Die Schule hatte ich tatsächlich vor kurzem schon eingetragen, ich habe jetzt Deine Bearbeitung damit zusammengeführt, damit man nicht zwei Schulen hat.
Viele Grüße,
Hendrik
kuhni74 (2026-03-23 11:31:33+00:00): Danke!
Wildsharky (2026-03-25 10:24:56+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:180353036
ToniE (2026-03-23 10:29:12+00:00): ... Bahnhofplatz 4: ...
micheleOSM3 (2026-03-23 16:16:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap! Just a quick heads-up: I noticed that in this changeset, the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13758524 was accidentally broken (likely due to ways being split or removed).
Relations can be tricky to handle. Feel free to try and fix it yourself, but if you're not sure how, just let me know and I'll take care of the restore.
You can find more details on how to manage them here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation
Thanks again for your help and happy mapping!
micheleOSM3 (2026-03-23 16:25:59+00:00): see also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Order_matters
EmanueleAby (2026-03-23 16:30:53+00:00): hi Michele, thank you for your reporting, I added the missing part in Corso Giuseppe Verdi to fix it. Hope this time I didn't broke something else!
micheleOSM3 (2026-03-23 16:36:16+00:00): I'm sorry, but the problem isn't solved. I recommend carefully reading the links I provided earlier. They're boring, but it's essential to fully understand the topic so you can be a better mapper.
EmanueleAby (2026-03-23 17:36:12+00:00): I read the link you provided, I saw a redundant line in the 095 relation, I removed it. I split the hiking route in Corso Giuseppe Verdi and Corso Italia since there is a separeted-by-line cycle-foot way on the sidewalk. Hope this helps and that I fixed my problem.
micheleOSM3 (2026-03-23 18:33:34+00:00): No, I'm sorry, but the problem remains.

If you don't know how to use JOSM, you can use waymarkedtrails, for example using this link: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=13758524 You'll see the relation. At the bottom right is "analyze relation." If you click it, it tells you what the problems are.

Anyway I suggest you to learn JOSM, it takes some time, but for doing some editing on OpenStreetMap it is much better than iD