piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
alessandrocarmeli (2023-02-22 16:23:40+00:00): non condivido alcune scelte sulla classificazione delle strade
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132809340
JavierSp (2023-04-18 13:00:30+00:00): El mapa de OSM no es para hacer gamberradas.
zluuzki (2023-03-01 16:42:31+00:00): Some questions...
...  Why did you rename this to "Oil Reserve"? That's wrong, because they're always, without exception, called "Petroleum Reserve" (short "SPR").
... Why did you tag this as "man_made=works"? This is wrong, because "works" means that something is manufactured there (which is obviously not the case)
... Why did you convert the area to a node (large facilities should be mapped as area, that's more detail; consumers can extract the node if they only need a single coordinate automatically)
SherbetS (2023-03-02 02:56:06+00:00): hey zluuzki,

I don't remember why I set the name to oil reserve. I can change it back in a day or so.

do you have a suggestion for a better tag, or a tag I should propose? this seemed like the most appropriate option from what I read on the wiki.

I don't see any reason why these objects can't be represented by a node.

-SherbetS
zluuzki (2023-03-02 11:14:28+00:00): I would just use industrial=oil or maybe industrial=oil_storage as the main tag.

I always use an area for larger industrial facilities like this because it contains more information.

It might also make sense to only leave the address on the node, and move the other tags to the area. (And connect both using a type=site relation.) Then you'd have both the area of the tank farm captured and the point where routers should point at best. But that's just an idea.

Greetings
Langlaeufer (2023-02-21 08:06:31+00:00): Kannst du was zu diesem Weg sagen? Steht da ein Schild oder eine Absperrung woraus sich die Verbote ableiten lassen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474024338
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132809779
Oerrie (2023-02-26 09:57:46+00:00): Der Weg ist (oben) ab dem Bach bis zur unteren Abbiegung ein Privatweg
Langlaeufer (2023-02-21 08:02:52+00:00): Hallo Oerrie. Da Radfahrer Fußgänger und Reiter offensichtlich erlaubt sind ist ein motor_vehicle=no vollkommen ausreichend.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132809819
user_18526234 (2023-02-21 12:55:54+00:00): Hello marekhrabe,
  I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
  Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
  Please read:
  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
  For a list of alternative tags.

  Greetings Tjuro_Bot
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-20 22:00:39+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10681849704
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10681849710
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10681849765
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10681849768
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10681849770

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2023-02-24 11:10:37+00:00): Poprawione.
user345 (2023-02-21 11:51:51+00:00): Dass der Parkplatz am Elsterbach jetzt als Busdepot genutzt wird, macht ihn doch noch lange nicht zum Gewerbegebiet, oder?
Elsterbach (2023-02-21 15:14:11+00:00): Nein, aber ein Öffentlicher Parkplatz ist es ja auch nicht mehr. Kannst es gerne zu etwas passenden ändern. Habe nichts besseres gefunden.
MxxCon (2023-02-21 07:38:18+00:00): Hello.
Rather than adding such tiny landuse, wouldn't it better to just tag the building as dormitory?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132810125
osmkarl (2023-02-21 17:04:41+00:00): I thought about this as well.  However, Columbia Residential owns about 150 building up here (https://residential.columbia.edu/content/explore-residences), and most seem to be in contiguous groups.  Some of these areas are already bounded similarly in areas in OSM. For visual display and consistency's sake, I thought it best to use the same method for all these Columbia Residential buildings, even if it seems awkward for several of the solo buildings such as this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132810125
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-20 22:10:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148066355

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Michoo (2023-02-20 22:44:51+00:00): Upss... Już poprawiłem.
NorthCrab (2023-02-21 02:43:09+00:00): Dzięki !
map per (2023-02-21 06:21:18+00:00): Wegen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen": Sieht alles gut aus, danke!
charles chilufya (2023-02-20 22:42:03+00:00): Just wondering tracing water are also shows that water passes in the main road. could this be right?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132810899
FTA (2023-02-21 00:38:33+00:00): Hello charles chilufya. I usually add tunnels or bridges where waterways go under roads, but I may have missed one. Would you mind linking to the intersection? I am happy to resolve. I did not see any show up immediately in JOSM validator. Thanks! Ethan aka FTA
charles chilufya (2023-02-20 22:45:37+00:00): Next time use building = Yes not (house). great starting.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132810903
charles chilufya (2023-02-20 22:56:36+00:00): hi, learn a bit of mapping and enjoy it
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132810908
charles chilufya (2023-02-20 22:52:01+00:00): Good mapping here
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132810917
charles chilufya (2023-02-20 22:32:03+00:00): great
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132810923
ovruni (2023-02-21 00:45:19+00:00): Hola, he notado que en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios se han agregado tierras de cultivo con nombres que llevan textos como "Asociación ...", ademas de que estas contienen áreas con otros objetos (como edificios o áreas que no parecen cultivo). Por ahora he movido las claves a operator que es lo que parece hacer referencia sobre quienes están a cargo de estas tierras, sin embargo las etiquetas de tierra de cultivo deberían estar destinadas a solamente las áreas donde se encuentra el cultivo.
Saludos
TuAmigoElEditor (2023-02-21 19:11:03+00:00): Ok. Mapearé de esa forma. 
Saludos
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-02-26 18:23:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_historic_events_and_historic_features
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132811049
user_18526234 (2023-02-21 12:55:54+00:00): Hello lorenzo23622,
  I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
  Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
  Please read:
  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
  For a list of alternative tags.

  Greetings Tjuro_Bot
jpennycook (2023-02-20 22:56:32+00:00): changeset comment was truncated, should have ended: merge roads not physically segregated
jpennycook (2023-02-20 22:57:09+00:00): someone modified some of the same relations at the same time, so some sections of road around Fernbank Road that I deleted weren't actually deleted, see my next changeset
eggie (2023-02-21 08:04:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_18526234 (2023-02-21 12:55:54+00:00): Hello WlaDeQ,
  I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
  Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
  Please read:
  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
  For a list of alternative tags.

  Greetings Tjuro_Bot
sheldonelectric (2025-04-17 10:25:02+00:00): Ενώ κοιτάμε την ίδια ιστοσελίδα, κάποια ονόματα είναι εντελώς διαφορετικά. Ίσως να άλλαξε η ιστοσελίδα τους από πρόπερσι; Τα ενημέρωσα όπως φαίνονται σήμερα.
ika-chan! (2025-04-17 12:20:20+00:00): @sheldonelectric, You have changed the junction names to a format that I am confident that the Greek community has not agreed on. At this stage, I am concerned that you are editing disruptively and causing rife in our community.

There is a reason you need to work together with the Greek editing community. You cannot insist that *every* one of your edit to the name or name format is the correct way to do it. Databases can have errors or name formats that go against consensus, and when it happens we need to adapt and correct as we can do with "IVI" bus stop in Marousi, North Athens.

Continuing to edit combatively and against the consensus of the Greek community will not change anything.
sheldonelectric (2025-04-17 13:05:27+00:00): The Greek community passed a consensus (which you saw and replied, without objecting) that it's ok to add 26500 mistakes, when it's too much work to control first...

Back on topic, junction names cannot be found by survey (correct me if I'm wrong). Junctions had wrong names, for example  8 Metamorfosi and 5A Aspropyrgou. I copy/pasted the official website on all junctions.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-20 23:10:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430016667
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430016508

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2023-03-03 00:50:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 133232206, 133232218, 133232224, 133232227, 133232225, 133232208, 133232216, 133232213, 133232177, 133232229, 133232203, 133232220, 133232198, 133232180, 133232189, 133224701, 133232215, 133232214, 133232188, 133232199, 133232207, 133232205, 133232182, 133232222, 133232186, 133232200, 133232191, 133232223, 133232209, 133232169, 133232230, 133232194, 133232197, 133232210 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import with unclear licensing in Madagascar
woodpeck_repair (2023-03-03 00:50:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 133232206, 133232218, 133232224, 133232227, 133232225, 133232208, 133232216, 133232213, 133232177, 133232229, 133232203, 133232220, 133232198, 133232180, 133232189, 133224701, 133232215, 133232214, 133232188, 133232199, 133232207, 133232205, 133232182, 133232222, 133232186, 133232200, 133232191, 133232223, 133232209, 133232169, 133232230, 133232194, 133232197, 133232210 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import with unclear licensing in Madagascar
ALu68 (2023-02-25 12:48:18+00:00): Hello iwanagaiwanaga,

This is not a name!
元尼崎センタープール管理用地

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10681938800
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/879068532

Please the wiki.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
mikkolukas (2023-06-09 01:20:56+00:00): Please don't map sidewalks and cycleways as separate ways if they are not separated by any obstacles.

The highway already have sidewalk=* and cycleway=* tags (which should not be removed).

Only tag sidewalks and cycleways separate if there are features that needs to be mapped in between or the traffic flow is different from the road it is following.

I have removed a lot of what you have mapped for this exact reason.
syntex (2023-06-09 08:59:45+00:00): They are, the kerb is very steep there
mikkolukas (2023-06-09 10:45:34+00:00): Not more than any other kerb in Denmark. Not enough to separate them that much.
Glassman (2023-02-22 01:19:10+00:00): #TIP: Other imagery is available in the background layer when using the editor. Bing is the highest quality but was taken before the building was even started. ESRI World Imagery has the building but Maxar Premium Imagery is more current but not very sharp. I modified the building - although you did great.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132812704
user_3022894 (2023-03-28 18:25:46+00:00): Hi Streetview247,

wie es dir auch schon andere Mapper mitgeteilt haben: Radwege auf der Fahrbahn (die sog. "Schutzstreifen") erfassen wir grundsätzlich nicht als eigene Wege, sondern mit cycleway=lane an der Straße. Dies ist auch bereits gegeben,

Ich entferne daher die von dir in diesem Änderungssatz hinzugefügten Fahrbahn-Radwege wieder.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-21 01:44:13+00:00): Please do not change ponds into water hazards when they are not on a golf course.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-21 01:45:51+00:00): Reverted in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132814518
Frans S (2023-02-28 17:41:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Each rectangular building need to be squared. !!  Q key when still selected
Nodes of buildings may not connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132813309
hdevine825 (2023-02-21 19:50:30+00:00): Hi, when mapping buildings where there are already address nodes, it is best to add the address details to the building it relates to. You can map the building, then select both the building and address (hold shift to select both) and merge them (either via right click or pressing C.)

Happy mapping and let me know if you have any questions.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-21 01:39:31+00:00): Why did you change ponds into water hazards when they are not part of a golf course?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132813472
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-21 01:40:56+00:00): Changeset reverted in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132814445
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132813472
Fischkopp0815 (2023-02-21 07:42:30+00:00): Keller 5 in Aasbüttel ist jetzt doppelt vorhanden. Seh dir das bitte nochmal an.
puma515 (2023-02-21 11:16:01+00:00): Danke für den hinweis. 

Die Adresse steht dort natürlich nur am Wohnhaus nicht am Nebengebäude.
Habe es überarbeitet. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448014091
user_6110846 (2023-02-24 08:35:02+00:00): большая просьба писать комментарии к своим правкам
jmarchon (2023-02-21 04:17:30+00:00): Hey!
Are you sure these transformers are in the middle of the road?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132814224
jmarchon (2023-02-21 04:19:45+00:00): Never mind, just saw you already fixed them.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132814224
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-21 01:26:59+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 132784318.
DA95 (2023-02-21 02:04:18+00:00): It's all temporary.  Chill.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-21 02:07:27+00:00): Do not map for temporary reasons.  Only things that actually exist should be added and maintained on the map.  Adding just to remove fictitious features does not belong on OSM.
DA95 (2023-02-21 02:28:13+00:00): Everything that I've added here will be gone soon.  There was nothing here before I put it here, and it will be put back to nothing.  No reason to get bent out of shape.
user_18526234 (2023-02-21 12:55:54+00:00): Hello Allroads,
  I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
  Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
  Please read:
  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
  For a list of alternative tags.

  Greetings Tjuro_Bot
Boyan Alexiev (2023-09-19 14:13:09+00:00): Hello Rilie,

Thanks for taking the time to map around these areas. Unfortunately the buildings mapped are not valid.

Please check the wiki for helpful examples on how to map buildings:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building

Specially for the name key, please add it only if you're confident that it's a valid name that the building is referenced by, and not a field that has a general description.

All the best, and keep mapping! It's good to have you with us.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-19 19:04:18+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148103146/history has roof:type = dome that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape=dome was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-03-13 23:11:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133644624 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious, Finbarr Saunders level, vandalism. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6942 and 6941
user_18526234 (2023-02-21 12:55:54+00:00): Hello carlosnasci,
  I seems that you have added or eddited some landuse=village_green. Please read:
  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=village_green
  Would a more specific tag like grass or shrubbery be more appropriate?
  Please read:
  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=greenery
  For a list of alternative tags.

  Greetings Tjuro_Bot
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-09 17:40:13+00:00): is it stopping place for public transport based on tricycles?
arnalielsewhere (2026-02-10 00:04:54+00:00): it is more a terminal where pee ride the vehicle. It can also be where they alight
arnalielsewhere (2026-02-10 05:18:44+00:00): where *people ride
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 08:24:43+00:00): So it is more a tourism attraction than a public transport?
arnalielsewhere (2026-02-10 08:33:33+00:00): it is public transport for locals, there's no tourism attraction within the surrounding area. The area is a mix of residential and commercial/local business
Timmy_Tesseract (2026-02-25 01:33:52+00:00): Possibly this could be tagged as amenity=taxi + taxi_vehicle=auto_rickshaw (see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:taxi_vehicle)
impiaaa (2023-02-21 16:15:54+00:00): Could you please try to be a little more descriptive about what you changed any why? Like if it was road realignment, lane tagging, new building traces, something else, or some combination. Here are some more suggestions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thanks!
Dogman15 (2023-02-22 05:27:32+00:00): No. Just scroll down a little bit. What I added should finish showing up at all zoom levels in a few days. An octagon building, a pool, an undrawn parking lane, categorization of a building that is an apartment building as ACTUALLY an apartment building instead of a generic building, and the right turn from E Remington Dr to E El Camino Real.
impiaaa (2023-02-22 06:54:46+00:00): Yes, that kind of description is good! Even though I can click through to see what objects you changed, it's not always obvious what you changed about them, and it's helpful when reading through long lists of changesets to know what each of them changed without actually clicking through (otherwise, the changeset description would be useless!). The wiki page I linked goes through these and many other reasons why descriptive changeset comments are useful.
Dogman15 (2023-02-22 07:16:05+00:00): Whatever.
Allison P (2023-02-22 21:23:51+00:00): This is not an appropriate attitude. It is not our responsibility to decipher what you're trying to do. This is a collaborative platform.
user_11609320 (2023-02-21 03:00:42+00:00): maping with AI places the buildings faster, but they are offset, might need manual adjustment. defeats the purpose
Glassman (2023-02-22 01:24:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132816042
Glassman (2023-02-22 01:24:21+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132816101
Glassman (2023-02-22 01:24:32+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132816265
Glassman (2023-02-22 01:24:38+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132816291
Frans S (2023-03-04 14:45:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task
Please tag buildings as building=yes
This is default for HOTOSM projects.
Best regard
Glassman (2023-02-22 01:24:43+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132816374
tonyf1 (2023-02-21 04:05:19+00:00): changeset comment continued: or explore this unique property by bike.
Removed bicycle&horse=no
Glassman (2023-02-22 01:20:48+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132816640
mavl (2023-02-22 06:27:56+00:00): Здравствуйте. В тег addr:housenumber попали лишние данные.  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1148115707
Allison P (2023-11-06 18:18:42+00:00): If I am not mistaken, the old tagging was correct. tourism=camp_pitch is used for spaces, while tourism=caravan_site is used for the grounds