piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 13:48:03+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151843621
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:05:38+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151843673
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 13:47:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151843721
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:04:47+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151843761
Swedneck (2024-10-02 18:36:10+00:00): Hi, is it really correct that the spur track for Alingsåsterminalen is razed? I know it's no longer in use but for it to be outright razed feels unlikely.
pfhllnts (2024-10-09 23:16:45+00:00): Thanks for reaching out, that's indeed a mistake. It's just a bit to remember after four months what the current state was when I was there, but I think it's not razed but actually another platform towards Göteborg. I'll check sources the next days.
pfhllnts (2024-10-09 23:32:43+00:00): Weird, I checked this driver cab video https://youtu.be/3r1YRVn8yfM?si=PNU6FEHJkmq1Yfvo&t=1542 and it seems it has indeed be razed, meaning that northern platform is only accessible from the east.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:04:39+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151843789
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:04:14+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151843859
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:04:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151843897
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:03:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great.  Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151843914
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:08:44+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151843941
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:08:22+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151843983
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:08:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151844013
DD1GJ (2024-05-26 13:03:42+00:00): Hallo Fachgruppe Mobilitätsmanagement,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die Verwendung des Schlüssels "osm_id" für eine Kennzeichnung des Parkplatzes ist sehr verwirrend und entspricht überhaupt nicht den üblichen Konventionen. Was bedeutet z.B. "A30"?

Is dies eine Fachgruppe [1] der Hochschule RheinMain? Dann fallen die Aktivitäten unter die Organised Editing Guidelines [2]. Im Benutzerprofil sollte dies dann vermerkt und eine dauerhafte Mailadresse der koordinierenden Person angegeben werden.

Viele Grüße, Joachim

[1] https://www.hs-rm.de/de/fachbereiche/architektur-und-bauingenieurwesen/fachgruppe-mobilitaetsmanagement

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Organised_Editing_Guidelines
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:18:01+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151844395
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:18:10+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151844430
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:52:39+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151844481
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-22 14:14:23+00:00): Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4869787 ?
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:17:29+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151844529
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:17:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151844559
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:16:50+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151844639
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 13:46:46+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151844741
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:16:31+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151844791
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 14:16:05+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151844857
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 13:46:16+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151844887
streckenkundler (2024-05-26 17:17:08+00:00): Hei,

Ich hab bei der Knotenpunktroute 41-42 mal einige Wegesegmente in eine eigene Relation vom type=basic_network verschoben: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151861725 Den Abschnitte Eichner Grenzweg zum Knotenpunkt 41 sehe ich eher als Anschlußroute, um zum Knotennetz zu kommen. der type=basic_network scheint da besser zu passen...

Sven
StefanHRT (2024-05-26 17:36:25+00:00): Hi Sven, Sehe jetzt erst dass Du hier geschrieben hast, hatte Dir mittlerweile in Deinem CS samt Foto geschrieben.

VG Stefan
Baloo Uriza (2024-06-13 20:22:16+00:00): Duplicate...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151845578
Gregory Peony (2024-07-05 00:22:33+00:00): Building footprints could have been more accurate, given the quality of the imagery.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151845779
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-27 05:37:18+00:00): Should be reverted!?
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-05-27 14:30:05+00:00): Should be reverted!
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-05-27 14:37:08+00:00): I've review all changesets made by this user and revert some unproper later. Because them obviously obey the guideline that OSM handle disputed territories.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-05-27 15:25:11+00:00): Done! 
Reverted in following changeset:

* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151904185 
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151904881
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151905040
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-27 05:37:07+00:00): Should be reverted!?
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-05-27 15:25:15+00:00): Done! 
Reverted in following changeset:

* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151904185 
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151904881
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151905040
Gregory Peony (2024-06-27 21:20:21+00:00): The geometry of the building to the NW of this changeset is inaccurate. The building's roof has a bright and shaded part. This is becuase the sun is shining from the North as can be confirmed by the shadows being cast Southward. The footprint you mapped also contains the building's shadow. Buildings can cast shadows on their own walls, but I don't think that is the case in this imagery: it is the easten wall that can be seen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151845904
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-27 05:36:05+00:00): Should be reverted!?
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2024-05-27 15:25:19+00:00): Done! 
Reverted in following changeset:

* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151904185 
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151904881
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151905040
miluethi (2024-05-26 13:04:31+00:00): Arul, what are you doing? You created a new building over 2 existing ones. Don't do this.
dsaneus (2024-06-10 14:40:19+00:00): Hola!

He revertido los cambios que hiciste en la zona en obras del enlace entre la RM-15 y el Arco Noroeste. Al eliminar del mapa las calzadas de la RM-15 que se han dado de baja, dejaste todas las geometrías sin conexión, imposibilitando el establecimiento de rutas por parte de los buscadores.

Si bien es útil ir actualizando las zonas en obras, cuando hay tantos cambios en poco tiempo, y sin tener planos o imágenes aéreas de cómo se va ejecutando, puede ser mejor dejar todo como está, hasta que concluyan las obras.

En este caso, se puede dejar todo como estaba en OSM, hasta que se abra el nuevo trazado de la RM-15, momento en el que se podrá eliminar el trazado actual y cambiar de "highway=construction" a "highway=motorway" el nuevo trazado.

Un saludo!
~dsaneus
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-26 12:30:37+00:00): Hi luandro63, welcome to OSM.

I guess all your added named should be checked. Please do not utilized the name-tag to describe the feature.
cquest (2025-11-24 07:57:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Le format à utiliser pour les numéros de téléphone est du type +33 6 13 17 33 97 et non pas +0613173397

Merci d'y penser pour les prochaines contributions !
cartoleo (2025-11-25 12:30:47+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour la remarque ! Effectivement j'utilise habituellement le format +33, j'ai dû oublier pour cette fois-là.
Bonne journée ! :)
VA00 (2024-12-27 19:26:26+00:00): Opis dajemy do description, nie do name.
silversurfer83 (2024-05-26 20:44:38+00:00): Gude :)

Guckt ihr mal hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151847070
map per (2024-05-27 17:26:28+00:00): Hallo dafelix,

wegen review requested:
Hier war eigentlich nichts falsch. Ich hab  bei Siemens und SAP das Gebäude und das Büro wieder getrennt, weil es in OSM die "One feature, one OSM element" Regel (1) gibt und weil beide Firmen nicht das gesamte Gebäude belegen (die TUM hat dort auch Räume)

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
dafelix (2024-05-30 09:52:37+00:00): Hi, bzgl. "one-feature": Es stimmt, dass das Gebäude nicht nur von Siemens genutzt wird (ich arbeite dort, im 1. Stock ist die TUM), allerdings ist der Name des Gebäudes trotzdem "Siemens Technology Center Garching". Wie es bei SAP genau sein wird weiß ich leider nicht. Ich lasse die Änderung jetzt erst mal wie von dir vorgenommen. Später können wir dies ggf. immer noch korrigieren.

Viele Grüße!
map per (2024-05-30 14:28:40+00:00): Ok, "Siemens Technology Center Garching" als Gebäudename ergibt auch Sinn. Das wäre dann:

building=office
name=Siemens Technology Center Garching
...
fürs Gebäude und

office=company
name=Siemens
für die node

Ich find aber weiterhin "Siemens Technology Center Garching" als Büronamen sinnvoller als als Gebäudenamen.
Gregory Peony (2024-07-28 05:59:10+00:00): I don't think that there is enough evidence in aerial imagery to justify adding this footprint. I deleted it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151847277
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-26 12:14:39+00:00): 👋 Не забывайте обновлять карты, кажется у вас очень старые данные
Gregory Peony (2024-07-28 05:48:49+00:00): This outlines a vegetation; not a building. I deleted the footprint.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151847379
dmfr (2024-06-13 16:14:26+00:00): Olá Pedro! Esta way 1286790947 será um engano? Uns metros a Oeste, existe uma way que também se chama "Rio Frio".
PedroMTG13 (2024-06-13 18:28:04+00:00): Diogo, sim provavelmente esqueci de eliminar este troço
PedroMTG13 (2024-06-13 18:28:44+00:00): Porque na altura estava sem as fronteiras ligadas
Spiekerooger (2024-05-26 12:34:35+00:00): Hello thefrankbraun,
El Valle has it's own ISO3166-2 code and that is DO-37. You are right about the two subdivisions, they have their own codes as well. But DO-37 is the code for El Valle, so it should not be removed. DO has two levels of subdivions all caring a ISO3166-2 code. You have already been asked elsewhere (Belgium area) to start a topic at community.openstreetmap.org about your ISO3166-2 code changes. It would love to see if you do that before you continue to work on this codes and delete good information. Thank you.
Spiekerooger (2024-05-26 12:41:50+00:00): [sorry about the all typos,  it should have been:
*all carrying an ISO3166-2 code...
*I would love..
*these codes...
]
thefrankbraun (2024-05-26 15:00:48+00:00): Hi,

as you can see from https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/problem-with-jinja-district-in-uganda-ug-204/113780 I took the feedback to heart and started a thread one a change which I thought might be controversial/unclear.

However, this deletion here doesn't seem to me to be controversial at all.

DO-37 is also tagged here: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9608153

DO-37 shouldn't be tagged in two geographically different regions at the same time, that wouldn't make any sense.

If you look into the ISO3166-2 standard DO-37 is the "parent" of DO-07 and DO-22. So the tag here was clearly wrong and that's why I deleted it.

I assume it's just a coincidence that this area here is also called "El Valle".
thefrankbraun (2024-05-26 15:09:38+00:00): I just want to add that I appreciate the feedback and have no intention to delete good information.
Spiekerooger (2024-05-26 15:36:03+00:00): Sorry, you are right, this El Valle is not the El Valle that is the region DO-37, I see it now. I misunderstood your changeset comment when I first read it. But with your explanations and while looking at the regions of DO again, it makes sense.
marczoutendijk (2025-09-04 19:44:30+00:00): Hi rademalis,
Here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1286792889#map=19/54.024627/18.344184
you have:
natural=pond
water=lake
Now what is it?
A pond or a lake?
The accepted way of tagging is:
natural=water
water=pond (or lake, but something cannot be both)

Can you fix it?

Best regards  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
rademalis (2025-09-07 16:43:56+00:00): Dzięki. Poprawione
literan (2024-05-26 12:17:30+00:00): не надо прилеплять углы здания к автодорогам
eggie (2024-05-26 12:40:41+00:00): Dag xs  Zijn hier dan de borden G12a verwijderd. Die staan nu nog steeds in je tagging.
OOk de accesstagging van een G12a fietspad staan er nog op. 
Het is niet consistent.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=151848424

MVG
eggie
Famlam (2024-08-24 20:29:43+00:00): Oeps, zie deze nu pas. Teruggedraaid, evenals een andere hier in de buurt.
Gregory Peony (2024-11-10 05:59:15+00:00): These footprints are valid but the imagery allows them to be more accurate. check Changeset: 158956046 to see how I mapped it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151848703
ika-chan! (2024-08-28 21:30:20+00:00): The EO51 doesn't go to Ormenio according to the 1963 decree as described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Greece/National_Road_Network. What's the source confirming the change?
mappinglander (2024-08-29 10:40:10+00:00): I don't exactly remember, it might have been wikipedia. obviously it might have been wrong.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-26 15:05:42+00:00): Hi  zahra1379, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your name of this new map element"_", correct?
Uralla (2025-03-24 09:16:54+00:00): Используй правильные теги: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbird_feeder
eggie (2024-05-26 13:12:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
söm4324 (2026-06-04 15:17:04+00:00): Hallo schenklklopfer, schaust du mal bitte in Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5203952 rein?
Du hattest mal das shop=deli gesetzt, daher hätte ich gerne deine Meinung, ob Cafe oder Deli besser passt.

Einerseits gibt's dort Kaffee und Nuss-/-Gebäck, was für Cafe spricht. Andererseits schreibt das Unternehmen auf ihrer Seite selbt "Nüsse Cafe Snacks", also Kaffee nichtmal an erster Stelle.

Vielen Dank!
logus2 (2024-07-20 20:08:36+00:00): Raw AI data import is not allowed in Hanoi. Please refrain from doing so again.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154194378
eggie (2024-05-26 13:17:34+00:00): Hoi GG
The key disused:shop=* is used for former shop=* features which are in a reasonable state of repair but which are currently unused
Wanneer een winkel echt weg is kun je de tagging gewoon verwijderen op het adres na. Evt verander je shop=... in shop=vacant
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-05-26 13:18:57+00:00): Je hebt ook wel eens van die winkelketens die Uitstel van betaling hebben aangevraagd en een doorstart maken na verloop van tijd. Dan zou je manier van sluiten oke zijn... maar is dat zo hier?
geogarrett (2024-05-26 13:27:55+00:00): Het hele interieur tot aan de gipsplaat is verwijderd en er hangt nu een bordje te huur.
eggie (2024-05-26 13:59:12+00:00): shop=vacant en dan de naam verwijderen is mijn advies.
Mapse..
eggie
MxxCon (2024-05-31 01:28:56+00:00): Hello.
Please note that this edit is incorrect and will be fully reverted.
public_transport=stop_position is a different element from public_transport=platform.
As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport, a properly mapped bus stop should consist of 3 elements, a =platform where passengers wait, a =stop_position where the actual bus stops on the way, and a relation combining the two. In this case you modified a =stop_position of bus stop number 306005 as can be seen on https://bustime.mta.info/#%7B%22label%22%3A%22306005%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22306005%22%7D and created a bus stop which does not exist at all.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151851386
eggie (2024-05-26 14:36:36+00:00): Review
Lijkt mij oke. Het adres moet immers ook vindbaar zijn.
Gr eggie
mikko_tamura (2024-05-30 05:32:09+00:00): shop=agrarian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151851457
eggie (2024-05-26 20:31:37+00:00): Please keep your edit area small.
This is an edit all over the world!
Greetz,
eggie
h0rr0rrdrag0n (2024-05-27 08:42:54+00:00): Better to keep size of changeset as small as possible for comfortable reviewing the changes :)

Explanation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-26 13:35:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Podana kombinacja addr:city + addr:place jest nieprawidłowa. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, usuń addr:place i zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, pozostaw tylko addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215416702
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215416737
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215416748
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215416876
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215416916
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215417092
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215417227
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215417552
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215417561
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215417596
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215417624

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2523852278
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215417696

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1073746572

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Luz R Finley (2024-06-03 13:33:28+00:00): Die image:n tags die hier plötzlich auftauchen sind "weird". Soll das so? Darf das so?
Luz R Finley (2024-06-03 13:37:32+00:00): Die Motivation dahinter war womöglich, die Problematik die im Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:image) besprochen wird: "Only one image can be linked to any OpenStreetMap feature with this tag."
thefabi (2024-07-15 16:38:23+00:00): Es ist auch möglich die Bilder auf Wikimedia Commons hochzuladen. Dort können diese in einer Kategorie hinzugefügt werden. Diese Kategorie kann anschließend mittels wikimedia_commons Tag in OSM hinzugefügt werden. z. B. "wikimedia_commons=Category:Hochschule Furtwangen University" an https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/274801116
Đuro Jiří (2024-07-20 02:59:27+00:00): Horario Castillo: board_type - history???
S_Carra (2024-05-26 13:33:20+00:00): No era dirección, Modifiqué un error de tipeo.
dypa (2024-06-02 12:53:07+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra
desertivy (2024-05-26 15:28:32+00:00): Hi,

I go through this intersection everyday, last time I went is today, traffic coming in this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1202724659 ,is closed by a physical barrier, and it's directed to this road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4210567 as a detour ,as I mentioned in my note. only traffic allowed is one way from this lane: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4210539 , how I mapped it is how it is in real life including removing and adding oneway tag, whatever"news" you're getting your information from is out dated and inaccurate, 
Regards.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151857757