piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab (2023-02-10 06:23:14+00:00): Wystarczy ustawić samo access=permissive. Dodatkowe ograniczenia są trochę nadmierne.
And-Mar (2023-02-12 18:45:09+00:00): Dzięki, zapamiętam!
szydzio (2023-02-08 20:18:10+00:00): Hej! Dla obiektów (tymczasowo) zamkniętych stosujemy prefix disued: do głównego tagu amenity. Poza tym nie ma potrzeby dublowania miejscowości (bez nadanych nazw ulic) dodatkowo w addr:city . Pozdr!
wukashi (2023-02-08 20:26:57+00:00): Dzięki za info o obiekcie zamkniętym ;) z adresem coś musiało wskoczyć przy uzupełnianiu atrybutów, dzięki za czujność :)
wukashi (2023-02-08 20:30:01+00:00): Widzę, że miałeś dziś też zmianę akurat w tym obiekcie. Zacząłem edycję kilka godzin wcześniej i zamknąłem ją dopiero niedawno, więc dlatego Twojej nie widziałem. Sory za zamieszanie ;)
szydzio (2023-02-08 20:38:03+00:00): Spoko, poprawiłem :) 
Bywasz tu częściej? 
Przypilnujesz kiedy otworzą stację?
wukashi (2023-02-08 20:47:22+00:00): Od czasu do czasu przejeżdżam, więc przypilnuję ;)
Frans S (2023-02-12 14:33:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
a remark. When you map a building and it crosses the border of a residential area, please move it a bit next to the building. 
Best regards
nostrada (2023-02-08 17:22:12+00:00): It is open during business hours of the library and shuts down at 4pm ish. It is an experience!
habi (2023-02-08 17:20:23+00:00): Nein: "Überwachungskamera erfasst"
LockOnGuy (2023-02-09 03:08:33+00:00): Hi, This changeset has been reverted. Please don't add your personal name to the map like this. Regards.
blacx (2023-02-09 20:35:08+00:00): Intenta no dibuixar les àrees agrícoles damunt dels camins
mueschel (2023-02-09 17:59:42+00:00): Hi,
something went wrong here. You added 2000 nodes without tags, and some that are duplicates of existing ones.  
Please always use the download function in JOSM and never try to load data from a file!


I reverted these changes.
Minh Nguyen (2023-02-26 21:55:07+00:00): There were a number of other issues in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132100886
Jordi MF (2023-03-06 20:36:58+00:00): Hola jpsa2023,
He vist que has afegit uns masos en ruïnes. Per a estos edificis, existeixen millors etiquetes que les relacionades amb "granges" perquè ja no tenen eixa funció. Les etiquetes que més utilitzem per a estos casos són "building=ruins" i, si es tracta d'un corral, jo afegisc man_made=sheepfold. I el nom del mas, és més adequat afegir-lo en un únic edifici, no en dos. Si la masada està habitada, pots crear un node independent que continga l'etiqueta "place=isolated_dwelling" + "name=*"; l'edifici es mapejaria sense nom (per a que no estiga repetit).
Deixe que ho corregisques tu mateix.
Per cert, he vist que estàs millorant Puertomingalvo i que has obert moltes notes. Si necessites ajuda per a tancar-ne alguna, puc donar una mà quan tinga temps.

Salutacions,
Jordi
jpsa2023 (2023-03-07 17:20:48+00:00): Hola Jordi,
Gràcies pel comentari. 
Prenc nota de les teues recomanacions i tractaré de corregir les etiquetes.
Efectivament estic cartografiant la zona de Puertomingalvo, i altres zones colindants que conec, perquè he vist que estaven prou buides.
Soc nou i  no entenc el que dius quan parles de que he obert moltes notes que cal tancar-hi. No era la meua intenció deixar res a mitges. Pots explicar-me com fer-ho?
Aprofite per fer-te una consulta. He comprovat que alguns de la comunitat utilitzeu JOSM en compte de ID com a editor.
Me'l recomanes?
Si et sembla bé, vaig a afegir-te com amic per estar en contacte.

Salut,
Pepe
NorthCrab (2023-02-10 03:56:20+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Please don't put unnecessary restrictions on roads: https://img.monicz.dev/-cc3ydxS5A9. If there are no restrictions (signs) it's best to leave it empty. I also recommend familiarizing with the default access restrictions in Poland: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Poland

Cheers!
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-08 19:10:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7978655682
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7978655679
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9879680675
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6514914819
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6694649020
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8309634139
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7978664888
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7978664886
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7978664885
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10621768175
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10621768174
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2708773356
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6764804277
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6035073159
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8927483097
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025230872
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025230874
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118423315
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106104750
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132509720
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132512152
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132512155
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132526645
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132508457

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1132509710

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pio2_122 (2023-02-08 19:40:32+00:00): Poprawione.

Powodem tych duplikatów były już wcześniej zdublowane adresy. Przy łączeniu adresów z budynkami tylko jeden z takiej pary został usunięty, a jego tagi przeniesione na obrys.
NorthCrab (2023-02-09 05:07:51+00:00): Cool! Dzięki!
eggie (2023-02-08 22:56:27+00:00): Hi Alex.. What do you mean .. amenity=school with no name and  operator Correos?
Please reply,
eggie
JeroenHoek (2023-02-08 18:57:53+00:00): You've removed the boundary tag. Why?
JeroenHoek (2023-02-08 19:02:26+00:00): Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132271669

Please be more careful! You are editing objects you don't seem to understand.
JeroenHoek (2023-02-08 19:02:36+00:00): Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132271669
bxl-forever (2023-02-08 21:50:59+00:00): Thanks for adding shops.

You might be interested to know that OpenStreetMap is a collaborative map and that it already has lots of information about places.

It looks like you have been wanting to *add* as many places as possible without looking at existing data.  As a consequence, we spotted a high number of duplicate entries.  The map looks really weird now.

* You created a post office here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10621838951 but the post office was already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244506788

* You added a pharmacy (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10621841443) whereas it was already there: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3490636899

* This café named Faubourg Saint-Denis (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10621830408) looks very much like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6699391691

* Same for L’Abbaye (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10621837851) added 3.6 meters away from another pub with the same name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6699391786

In most of those cases, if there was a problem with the name or the category, the best option is to start from the existing object and update its tags.

Please review your changes, delete your newly created nodes and update information on the old nodes.  There may be more nodes than in the examples here.

Have a nice day.
benjabelge (2023-02-09 00:35:34+00:00): Hello, indeed I added things that were already there and I apologise for that. But I don't understand why there was no such data in OsmAnd~ (my everyday map app) nor in StreetComplete Android app (that I used to tag the places I saw no information about in these apps). I will delete that tomorrow as soon as I find out how. I am not confident in my apps anymore now and will be shy before contributing if I can't trust them. Still now I don't see any of these duplicates in the two apps I referred to.
bxl-forever (2023-02-09 08:02:32+00:00): Thanks for replying.

OsmAnd~ does not read real time information from the database, the map is always stored locally on your phone.
You can trigger an update every now and then: Download maps > Updates > Live updates > Belgium > Update now.

I see all the POI, you may have to zoom a lot, though: https://multimob.be/uploads/oand_230209-stdenis.png

In StreetComplete (same ShopsOverlay as you were using), I see all the shops, both old and new:
https://multimob.be/uploads/sc_230209-stdenis.png

I will try to clean it in the next days, so that you don’t have to do it, but indeed you may want to check in detail if your app is showing the right objects.
pmckay419 (2023-02-12 17:44:01+00:00): FYI, the Lost Lake trail has been adopted as an official system trail by the Forest Service, which constructed an official trailhead and realigned the trail to be more sustainable last fall. https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0vWJetZD8Qe36nu7Z3CYuMMFQS75KhPnrENjckDwhfLd8byic2vhiv9ymCpAs9EgMl&id=100063536294941&mibextid=Nif5oz

I have not edited the trail to reflect to new alignment yet so that will need to be done at some point in the future, preferably after someone hikes it and records a GPS track.
pmckay419 (2023-02-13 05:24:37+00:00): Update: After more research I discovered the new mostly does not follow the alignment of the old trail, and the old trail will indeed be closed. I changed the access tags back to closed and stubbed out the new trail based on the Forest Service map of where it is. Someone will need to refine that with a GPS track this spring.
kortgodt (2024-12-12 13:20:34+00:00): skov mærkes ikke med place locality
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-12-14 22:59:25+00:00): Nej, men landuse=forest, som det var før, kan ikke bruges på en knude.

natural=wood kunne bruges på en knude. Men så vil vi få natural=wood knuder inden i landuse=forest arealer, og det synes jeg heller ikke er god.

Og det vil kræve en del arbejde at finde trace skovområderne som arealer. Og der er en del skove som består af andre skove.

Det er et gammelt changeset. Svjh fik jeg tagget nogle at skovene som arealer. Men ikke dem alle.
kortgodt (2024-12-17 14:39:20+00:00): Du har brugt ændringen på flere changeset. kan ikke se at ændre en fejl til en anden fejl er særligt bevendt her . Som minimum kunne du gøre opmærksom på at en fejl er lavet til en anden fejl.
Marek-M (2023-02-09 09:55:53+00:00): Dzięki za takie poprawki. Myślałem, że tylko ja nie rozumiem rozdzielania jezdni przy mikrowysepkach i dodawania pasów na skrzyżowaniach bez ich fizycznego rozdziału ale na szczęście jest nas więcej (przynajmniej 2) :) Good Job!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132270102
Yunkers (2023-02-09 13:01:50+00:00): Tutaj w większości przypadków nawet nie było wysepek, nie miałem chwili zawahania 😉
SekeRob (2023-02-09 11:31:39+00:00): Hi,

Ma.Sa opening hours flagged in QA, from 21:30 to 13:00 next day does not seem right too, maybe the other way. Anyway, this is the suggested format without correction of the seeming inversion
We 06:00-13:00,21:30-13:00; Th-Su 21:30-13:00; Jan 16-24 off

ciao
damianeue (2023-02-09 11:42:25+00:00): Hi, I've created the opening_hours tag on https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ and copy-pasted the result.
SekeRob (2023-02-09 12:01:35+00:00): Jan 16 - Jan 24 is certainly an unnecessary repetition same as it would be with  e.g. Su 13:00 - Su 23:00,  Anyway, thought I'd mention the allnighters for the icecream shop.

Thanks for the link BTW, a handy in-browser check when baffled by an error flag. 

ciao
tshikaboom (2023-02-08 21:57:20+00:00): Hello there!
It seems there's already a Maxima X just next to the node you added: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/933956989

Same goes for Ristiku Selver, Marienthali Selver, Merimetsa Selver (for the last one, the building itself is tagged as shop=supermarket, so it might not be obvious at first).

It also seems you added a supermarket to Kristiine Keskus, there's a Prisma node already there. Can you re-check for duplicate data please?

Endla Grossi was not there before, so that works :)
eggie (2023-02-08 22:54:27+00:00): Hi Alex,
Removed duplicated tagging school. You are sure you are familiar here?

You are editing random all over the world?
Greetz,
eggie
JeroenHoek (2023-02-08 18:54:06+00:00): This doesn't make any sense. The school is already mapped.
JeroenHoek (2023-02-08 19:03:30+00:00): Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132271669

The school is already mapped: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/623166044
SekeRob (2023-02-08 18:59:58+00:00): OK render is restored
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-02-09 11:51:08+00:00): I will revert that deletion. Please always ask before deleting the work of others. Every residential building with at least 3 flats inside have been added for analysis purposes in the area. Even single detached houses drawn are perfectly correct. OpenStreetMap is becoming more precise, so keep the precise data there. Thanks!
eggie (2023-02-08 22:34:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Tip.. Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus levert vaak schade op door onbedoelde verplaatsingen.
Hier heb je per abuis 	Burgemeester C. van de Werkenstraat 8 verplaatst naar een ander deel van de woonplaats.
Wanneer Luca's schuurtje geen openbare drinkgelegenheid is hoort het eigenlijk niet op de kaart. Kijk je nog even? 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132271912

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-08 22:36:29+00:00): Adres hersteld
Frans S (2023-02-12 10:41:38+00:00): Hello. I review mappings at random to check the quality of mappings. 
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery instead of the Maxar . I corrected them my moving all objects to their footprint on Maxar.
Please keep in mind to use the correct Imagery and align already mapped objects as well.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132271988
Langlaeufer (2023-02-08 20:22:27+00:00): und der Zutritt ist wirklich verboten oder nur auf eigene Gefahr?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132272197
wiebketru (2023-02-08 20:37:20+00:00): Nur für Bewohner der umliegenden Häuser
Langlaeufer (2023-02-08 21:46:54+00:00): alles klar, 
weiterhin frohes mappen
Tilia_J (2023-02-09 08:42:07+00:00): Goedemorgen,

Het aanwezig zijn van prikkeldraad / hekken rond weilanden en akkers is zo alomtegenwoordig dat het toevoegen aan openstreetmap zinloos / overbodig is en geen toegevoegde waarde heeft voor de gebruikers van onze kaart.

Niet dat het niet is toegestaan maar het zorgt mijns inziens voor een rommelig kaartbeeld.

Als je dit gebied een echte oppepper wilt geven raad ik je aan om waar bebouwing is de onderliggende vlakken van landuse residential, farmyard, retail of commercial te voorzien.
Bert de boer (2023-02-09 15:43:28+00:00): bedankt voor de feedback
dit was een beetje een experiment voor mij, ik ben het met je eens dat dit rommelig is,
ik zal dit opruimen
PT-53 (2023-02-09 08:12:22+00:00): Hallo Holgi1972,
dieser von Dir neu eingezeichnete Feldweg
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1140182337/history
überlagert teilweise diesen Feldweg:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/692584421/history

Kürzt Du den neuen Feldweg oder soll ich das für Dich übernehmen.

PS:
Fehler macht jeder einmal. Das ist kein Problem.

Grüße
@joyce_senaaa (2023-02-25 01:40:01+00:00): Aqui fala Marco ce eu nem ando mais nesse local
Lokai (2023-02-10 19:58:54+00:00): Hallo,

der ursprüngliche building tag wurde von Ihnen entfernt. Ohne diesen wird das Gebäude nicht dargestellt.
Ich habe den Fehler behoben.
Hufkratzer (2023-02-09 22:42:39+00:00): Hi,
the small buildings
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1140188179
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1140188180
are certainly not horse riding centres. Perhaps surrounding Rancho de Chão
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368221023
is one, compare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dhorse_riding
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1055559912
emersonveenstra (2023-02-09 01:23:12+00:00): Hi,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1129823003/ https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1140189700 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1129826445 you added left and right values for sidewalk/cycleway, but forgot to remove the main one that was already there, so now they are conflicting. Could you please fix that? Thanks!
Keegs (2023-02-09 01:31:16+00:00): Well that's embarrassing, thank you!
emersonveenstra (2023-02-14 15:03:34+00:00): Happens to everyone occasionally, don't worry about it :)
mueschel (2023-02-10 10:12:50+00:00): Hi,
what is the meaning of "ee_ehis_type = huvikool"? This tag is not used in other places.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-10 10:44:52+00:00): EHIS is Estonian education information system. It's a type educational facility has there.
mueschel (2023-02-10 10:52:03+00:00): Thanks,
this sounds like 'school:EE' might be a fitting tag - compare to the documented school:FR which is used to tag the French classification
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-10 11:03:13+00:00): I'm open to better tag key names. But I wouldn't like to use school-something as EHIS also contains facilities which can be mapped as colleges, universities, training, community centers.

 It also contains a subtype which may classify the facility in greater detail. For some reason it doesn't have anything which says if the educational facility is just a school or a school with a kindergarten, but I map these as two separate amenities.

Going back to this tag I just want to say by it "here's what it is in EHIS, but this may not be the best classification"
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-15 17:37:59+00:00): In the end I've named it EE:EHIS:type. I find that it better conveys hierarchical connection between the 3 words.
Hufkratzer (2023-02-10 22:04:18+00:00): Hi, du hast hier an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/848983454 das Tag building=farm_auxiliary gelöscht; deswegen ist das Gebäude jetzt nicht mehr auf der Karte zu sehen. Gebäude sollten immer ein building-Tag haben, egal, was sie sonst noch für Tags haben. Falls es ein Pferdestall ist, kannst du building=stable verwenden, falls es eine Reithalle ist, building=riding_hall.
Das Tag leisure=horse_riding (iD-Preset "Reitanlage"), mit dem du das Gebäude versehen hast, ist nicht für einzelne Gebäude gedacht, sondern für den Hof insgesamt (inkl. aller zugehörigen Gebäude, Reitplätze etc.) Dafür hast du ja schon vorher den Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10616684571 ("Erlenhof") mit leisure=horse_riding gemappt; doppelt sollte man den Hof nicht mappen.
Vgl. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-08 20:10:24+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10118401004
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10118401005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10118401006
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10118401007
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/920137923

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab (2023-02-09 08:27:59+00:00): Zaktualizowałem nazwy ulic w tej okolicy. Nie wprowadziłeś błędnych adresów. Po prostu ulice wymagały odnowienia. Za niedługo zmienię treść tego powiadomienia. Pozdrawiam!
maraf24 (2023-02-09 09:03:36+00:00): Dzięki, właśnie miałem sprawdzić i poprawić te nazwy :)
Glassman (2023-02-09 03:33:32+00:00): Thanks for updating the street names!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132274104
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-09 08:19:29+00:00): Czy zmiana nazwy stacji była celowa?

(edycja jest wycofana, ta stacja nie ma domeny w nazwie a już na pewno nie tą)
Szymson (2023-02-10 16:36:29+00:00): Bardzo rozbudowany opis zestawu zmian... Poza tym po co tutaj jednoelementowa relacja? Przecież to można po prostu jako obszar oznaczyć.
RicoElectrico (2023-02-10 17:47:37+00:00): @Szymson - możliwe, że to wina edytora. iD nie potrafi poprawnie połączyć dwóch obszarów w jeden i tworzy niepotrzebnie relację.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-08 20:37:16+00:00): Please use better changeset comments.  What exactly did you do?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
marczoutendijk (2023-02-08 22:25:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6849

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Jayden26 (2023-04-23 20:21:06+00:00): Also Im 10 years old
marczoutendijk (2023-04-24 06:09:59+00:00): Jayden,
You should realise that OSM is a map that is worldwide in use by many people, and that everything you do or add is immediately visible to the whole world! It's not a playground!
Please read the wiki help ages and ask for help when in doubt.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
1998alexkane (2023-02-15 13:20:40+00:00): Hi, for for buildings should only be used for the name (and not descriptions) Instead of name="Office Building" you can change the building type to building=office (as I did for you in this case). Happy Mapping and feel free to reach out if you have any questions!
uppermethow (2023-02-13 21:50:25+00:00): Thanks for your edits, Brett! When creating Way intersections, please be mindful to ensure there are no extra nodes that create "impossible angles" between Ways. (This happened between Norfolk and White)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132275508
uppermethow (2023-02-13 21:52:47+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132510747
MikeN (2023-02-08 22:56:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM!   When correcting a shape, it is best to modify the existing shape to maintain history rather than delete and redraw.   However that can be laborious when there is a big difference.   In that case it is best to copy existing tags (like the building address) to the new object.   In the ID editor, there is a "Text view" icon to the right of the Tags arrow.   That allows selection  and copying all tags to the new object.
skyper (2023-04-20 23:02:23+00:00): Hallo Hunter1811,
bitte schreibe doch aussagekräftiger Änderungssatzkommentare. Was hast Du denn geändert bzw. verbessert?
Auch bitte ich Dich bei Osmose vorsichtig zu sein und nur das zu verbessern, was Du auch verstehst.
Konkret verstehe ich nicht, warum Du die beiden Straßenabschnitte (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339833723 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1014908846) gelöscht hast. Dadurch hast Du einige Relationen beschädigt.
Fragende Grüße,
skyper
Baloo Uriza (2023-02-12 21:03:06+00:00): Naming sidewalks the same as the street they parallel helps.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132275674
EdLoach (2023-09-19 15:44:02+00:00): The footpath that you added when you deleted the service road that this note relates to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3186298 you've added bicycle=yes, but the first photo mentioned in that note suggests cycling is prohibited. This may have changed since the photo was taken, but thought I'd check with you.
eggie (2023-02-08 23:02:00+00:00): Beste Roel... Wanneer een bedrijf verdwijnt zal het adres toch gewoon blijven bestaan. Bestaat dit adres niet meer?

MVG
eggie
Roel Smits (2023-02-08 23:27:45+00:00): Adres bestaat nog, maar zag dat mijn bedrijf er nog bijstond. Bedrijf is inmiddels al enkele jaren permanent gesloten.
eggie (2023-02-09 06:33:11+00:00): Oke... Het adres heb ik hersteld. Er wordt je overigens niets kwalijk genomen.

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-02-08 22:58:25+00:00): Dag Roel  In OSM Nederland voegen we bedrijven toe aan de bestaande adresnodes. We zetten niet nogmaals het adres op de gebouwomtrek.
Ik zal het adres verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
Roel Smits (2023-02-08 23:28:29+00:00): Duidelijk! Bedankt voor respons.