piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2026-07-18 11:29:21+00:00): Ik heb toch nog wat aangepast.

G12a naar G11 omgetagd.
En waar de hulpdienste niet gebruik van maken de permit en emergency access verwijderd.
Fietspad op dr golfbaan staat op conditional.
user_5359 (2026-07-24 14:07:18+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on way/1430024159. What is the mean of the tag vocation = forestry;agriculture;technical
?
Makeena (2026-07-13 18:17:29+00:00): Changes around Hohlstrasse 438-482
Makeena (2026-07-13 18:20:06+00:00): I will upload a detailed update of the area incl. streets, buildings, addresses etc. by tomorrow
Wildsharky (2026-07-16 05:17:27+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185779407
iandees (2026-07-13 18:00:21+00:00): Just make a "Point" instead of a shape. A small shape inside the building makes it harder for people to find. A point is easier for people to find.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185668896
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-07-14 01:38:45+00:00): Thanks for adding these neighborhood features to the map! However, if there isn't an officially defined boundary of a neighborhood, it's better to map it as a single node rather than an area which can be subjective. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=neighbourhood?uselang=en#Node_or_area?
crossdiver (2026-07-14 20:56:02+00:00): Ahh, thank you! that makes more sense. Should I delete the area and add a single node? or leave the area and add a single node?
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-07-14 21:34:16+00:00): Personally I would delete the area, though you can read the wiki page and decide for yourself what the best option is
mavl (2026-07-16 15:49:51+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок испортил мультиполигон (контур мультиполигона содержит один и тот же сегмент дважды).  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8824183  
  
Постарайтесь осторожнее менять геометрию линий, которые входят в мультиполигоны.
Koreller (2026-07-14 07:17:24+00:00): Hi R_A, I saw that you've added a lot of objects in North Korea, thanks for this, but in your changeset I don't see the imagery that you've used.

What imagery did you used ?
In the future, can you specify that every time ?

And also can you use better changeset comment ? "NK" is really not useful...
Instead you can check this OSM wiki page : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Good mapping.
nerihv (2026-07-25 22:45:51+00:00): Porqué ? cuál fue el error?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185669628
nerihv (2026-07-26 00:50:40+00:00): cambié la etiqueta a Salt Ponds.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185669628
martinst (2026-07-13 18:31:57+00:00): Hallo sagrnn,
ich denke es wäre besser wenn Du als Hintergrund weiterhin 
https://mapsneu.wien.gv.at/basemap/bmapoberflaeche/grau/google3857/{z}/{y}/{x}.jpeg
verwendest, weil die Geodaten der "Bayerische[n] Vermessungsverwaltung" wie hier erläutert derzeit nicht verwendet werden dürfen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Germany
Gruß Martin
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-07-14 01:51:03+00:00): Thanks for helping edit the map. This doesn't really meet the OSM Wiki definition of a leisure=park, since it's just a church lawn and isn't signed as a park nor does it have any park amenities.
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-07-14 01:52:29+00:00): One more note: it's best to avoid drawing landuse areas by attaching them to highway features (paths, roads, etc). This makes it very difficult to detangle and edit these features later.
crossdiver (2026-07-14 20:57:04+00:00): Great to know -- if they are not attached to another feature, what's the best way to make them go up to the feature? like, follow a path or a stream but not be attached to it? I am using the browser editor right now.
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-07-14 21:33:36+00:00): My secret weapon in the browser editor is the ALT key. If you hold it down while drawing nodes, it prevents those nodes from snapping to any other features.
pyram (2026-07-29 15:21:14+00:00): Danke für den Eintrag.
Wahrscheinlich ist hier aber keine Imkerei ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:craft%3Dbeekeeper ) gemeint, die "SB Honigschrank" heißt, sondern ein Verkaufsautomat (oder Schränkchen), wie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vending=honey?uselang=de ?
Die haben häufig gar keinen Namen. "SB" soll wahrscheinlich "Selbstbedienung" heißen. Das muss bei einem Verkaufsautomaten nicht extra erwähnt werden ;-)
Frans S (2026-07-14 09:12:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
In general, well and precise mapped.
However, you regulary included a yard into your mappings. Please follow the rooflines more accurately
Check this webpage where you can see my adjustments.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=185704081
Top right.

Best regards
ScrawnyMeowth1 (2026-07-14 01:32:41+00:00): I haven't heard these neighborhood names before. Where did you get these from?
crossdiver (2026-07-14 20:55:22+00:00): I've just heard them around -- I don't know of any official names
Norbert Dichter (2026-07-13 19:06:21+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contributions. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. Many of your buildings close to each other have sharing nodes. Would you please aggregate or separate them.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185670928
MassCartog (2026-07-14 13:17:03+00:00): Hello again, this is another case where you should not use the name tag to just describe the feature. A 	Baseball Field feature should not also be named 	Baseball Field, if it has no name just leave it blank. Thanks

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Itsjustme9112 (2026-07-14 16:04:17+00:00): Is that just a thing with OSM? Is there a way to identify by labeling the features for viewing purposes when looking at the map?
MassCartog (2026-07-14 18:22:58+00:00): This might sound strange, and long winded, but it might help you understand OSM a bit better.

OSM does not have an official map, "the map" you are likely looking at is just one of many you can pick from on the OSM website, but none of them are a official "map" just default reference style you can use to help you map. Its a reference implementation of how a map could look.

OSM "product" is really the database, not a map. What you are helping build is a Geo spatial database that is free for anyone that wants to use it. The idea is people can use the database to make any kind of maps they like.

That means if you or anyone want to, they can make a map that labels features based on their feature type like "Soccer Field". Or even better most map styles come up with Icon/line type/color that uses the feature type tag easily identify it for viewing purposes.

But a lot of people that create maps (including the map you're likely are looking at) don't want every single thing labeled, they just want features with real names labeled. (There are actually a ton of feature types that don't even show on map you're seeing! Invisible on one map, but vital for others.) 

So the problem is, if tags are used incorrectly, like using the Name Tag for generics like "Barn", "Private road", "House", "Soccer Field", all the people that don't want those labels on their map can't filter them out because the wrong tag was used. And for the people who DO want them on a map? Its entirely possible to use the feature type to label anything they want on their map.

Hope that helps, Thanks for reading if you got this far!
Itsjustme9112 (2026-07-14 23:47:03+00:00): okay, okay.  That makes more sense then. Every little bit helps with me.  I see what you're saying though. Thanks for letting me know. If you see anything else I might screw up on just let me know. I am new to this somewhat and just trying to make what shows up on my work map cleaner and compare and match information from florence city and lauderdale county GIS information among other sources. There are a lot of very wrong addresses location updates that need to be done. Our in-house GIS guy updates our map on a separate layer but its just layered over OSM so anything that isn't lined up, it sticks out a lot and is clustered. How long have you been doing this?
Wildsharky (2026-07-16 05:13:42+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185823509
dcapillae (2026-07-13 19:06:55+00:00): Hola, Arcadio.

Casi hemos coincidido editando el carril a la vez :-D

He pasado por él esta tarde en bici. ¡Da gusto tenerlo abierto por fin!

Un cordial saludo,
Daniel
areyesl (2026-07-17 14:43:55+00:00): Hola, Daniel 

Si, paso por ahí muy a menudo y era una tortura el paso estrecho con los peatones y el poco tiempo que da el semáforo. Así que en cuanto lo he visto abierto, nada mas lelgar a casa, lo he editado :-D.

Saludos,
Arcadio
rajdhani (2026-07-16 06:03:50+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185825257
Wildsharky (2026-07-15 04:39:29+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185694943
s777n (2026-07-14 07:53:17+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы добавили резорт с именем "здание" Так делать не нужно. Лучше просто оставить заметку что здесь есть дом вместо того чтобы вносить мусор.
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-17 12:51:29+00:00): Not a residential street.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185673384
MappingMore (2026-07-14 07:17:50+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185698596
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-17 12:50:11+00:00): If buses are only allowed with permission, then access=private is correct.  access=bus is meaningless.  If all buses are allowed as a designated route, then leave access=private alone and add bus=designated.  If buses are allowed but it's not a designated route, then bus=yes instead.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185673514
Wildsharky (2026-07-15 04:45:00+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185713497
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-17 12:50:37+00:00): That's not a residential street, that should be highway=service, service=parking_aisle.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185673726
goodidea (2026-07-29 00:58:28+00:00): Hallo Engideer!

Nur kurz noch was zu diesem Changeset (siehe meine ganzen Anmerkungen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186026186).

Darauf bin ich jetzt noch durch Zufall gestoßen – ich habe dein Eindruck, dass alle deine Zusammenführungen fehlerhaft sind.

Hier nur als Beispiel:
Du hast bei der Sulzbachtalstraße ich denke 3 Stücke zu einem zusammengeführt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239360672). Vorher gab es ein kurzes Teilstück an der Haltstelle St. Avolder Straße (C) mit bus_bay=right (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149017484), jetzt hat der ganze lange Weg bus_bay=right! Das ist definitiv falsch! bus_bay ist nur im Bereich der Haltestelle – dafür war das kleine Teilstück notwendig.

Oder in der Straße „Am Geisenberg“ gab es ein Teilstück mit hazard=children (nicht von mir, aber wohl weil da Schilder stehen, nehme ich an + es an der Schule dort ist) – jetzt hat der gesamte lange Straßenweg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27618271) hazard=children – das kann wohl auch nicht stimmen. Ich denke, dir war nicht bewusst, auf was man da alles schauen muss.

Ich hab nicht weiter geschaut, aber bei allem, wo ich bisher  drauf geschaut habe, war das, was du gemacht hast, nicht OK.

Es ist wirklich aufwändig, das nochmal zu korrigieren ... ich hoffe, es war nicht noch viel mehr.

Vielleicht kannst du mal schreiben, wo du das überall gemacht hast – und wer das nochmal in Ordnung bringen sollte ... Kannst du das zum Beispiel (zuverlässig) selbst machen? Hast du Erfahrung damit? (Denn dabei kann man ggf. auch noch mehr kaputt machen ...)

Ansonsten wäre das einfachste, all diese Changesets zu revertieren (wenn du eine Liste machen könntest mir den changeset-Nummern, wäre das z.B. schon mal eine Hilfe)! Alles andere ist sehr viel Arbeit ...

Viele Grüße!
Engideer (2026-07-29 09:13:00+00:00): Hello goodidea,

Da es in den Merging Changesets nichts außer den Merges drinnen gibt, und da ich bei denen auf falschen Annahmen gearbeitet habe (siehe meine Antwort auf dein vorherigen Kommentar), wäre von meiner Seite kein Problem, diese zu revertieren. Es handelt sich hierbei um folgende 9 Changesets:

185673805
185809893
185810228
185810421
186026186
186083000
186083300
186083685
186083738

Ich habe noch keine Erfahrung mit Reverts aber ich kann Recherchieren was bei denen zu beachten ist. Wie gesagt, gib mir bitte Bescheid ob du die revertieren kannst oder ob ich dies übernehmen sollte.
goodidea (2026-07-31 18:17:35+00:00): Ich versuche jetzt mal damit anzufangen und schaue, ob es einfach oder schwierig wird. Danke für die Nummern, ein gute Hilfe. 

Ich schreibe dir dann, was erledigt ist, damit wir nichts doppelt machen oder so ... Und geb dir eine Rückmeldung, wenn Probleme aufgetreten sind.

Ich würde dann vielleicht am WE oder die nächsten Tage weiter machen, alles schaffe ich heute bestimmt nicht (vielleicht eins davon). Außer es ist sehr unproblematisch (was ich aber leider nicht erwarte).
Sanniu (2026-07-16 05:39:12+00:00): Hi, you have changed street name but not the addresses on it making them non-searchable
MxxCon (2026-07-14 03:47:23+00:00): Hello.
Please note that you mapped 2 crosswalks here as surface=concrete. That seems rather unlikely and very unusual since vast majority of streets in NYC are paved with asphalt. Mapping accuracy is extreme important in OSM. Please correct these. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185674791
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-17 12:52:27+00:00): Does this change names at the cul-de-sacs?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185675575
rajdhani (2026-07-15 09:50:00+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185772695
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-17 12:47:12+00:00): Instead of lanes=2, it looks like there should be no lanes=* tag and instead have lane_markings=no
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185675770
eggie (2026-07-14 08:41:21+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Bedankt voor uw bijdrage.
MVG
eggie
validator
NoReplyPlease (2026-07-31 17:25:51+00:00): With this update to Goucher College's boundaries, GPS systems such as onthegomap and others now do not recognize the south entry gate as a plausible route to enter when creating a loop/route for cross-county teams, runners, cyclist, or walkers. Please revert.
Svalbard (2026-07-14 05:40:20+00:00): Hallo Peppi95, ich warte immer noch auf eine Antwort von Dir zu der für die Adress-Eintragungen verwendeten Quelle. Darüberhinaus überlege ich, Deine Eintragungen der DWG [1] zu melden, um hier endlich Klarheit zu erhalten. Ggf. läuft es dann auf Reverts und eine Sperre Deines Konto hinaus. Gruß Svalbard

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Data_working_group
MappingMore (2026-07-15 10:41:28+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185775345
MassCartog (2026-07-14 13:16:57+00:00): Hi, wanted to let you know you are using the Name Tag incorrectly. It should not be used for describing the access of a feature, please just use the access tag for that, like access=private.

You can read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Itsjustme9112 (2026-07-14 13:33:45+00:00): Thanks for the information. I will try and correct these mistakes.
MassCartog (2026-07-14 13:56:00+00:00): Thanks! happy mapping, nice job improving your area!
ayxis (2026-07-15 06:29:46+00:00): Hi kjon,
diese Straße hat im Changeset Öffnungszeiten bekommen: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41658235
War das eventuell für den Altglascontainer bestimmt? :)

Viele Grüße
ayxis
kjon (2026-07-15 21:05:54+00:00): fixed
Udarian (2026-07-14 19:09:33+00:00): please double check your self, from what I can tell, and I have double and triple checked my self on this, there are no sidewalks along this segment of Northwest 36th Street so removing sidewalk:*=no is incorrect. 

happy mapping,
Udar.
alpacaMaps (2026-07-13 22:54:54+00:00): This changeset adds one surveillance camera that seems to be automatically detected and added. I set out to verify the camera placement and on both the Jackson Ave side as well as Mopac I was unable to identify a camera physically placed in the world.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually seen physically, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Note: I have not reverted this changeset yet, to provide time to discuss.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
ivanbranco (2026-07-16 21:37:49+00:00): Ciao Dom,

sei sicuro di queste modifiche?

Ero in zona giusto 4 giorni fa. Dumbarella si trova alle coordinate a cui lo avevo mappato. E Opera Viva mi sembrava aperto, a meno che non ha chiuso in questi quattro giorni. In mezzo a questi due locali ce n'era anche un terzo (De...gustando: https://www.instagram.com/degustandostintino)
Dom61 (2026-07-16 22:31:40+00:00): Ciao ti ringrazio per le notizie fresche che mi hai dato ed ho fatto il revert del changeset.
Leo Slager (2026-07-14 10:26:24+00:00): Met 36  foutmeldingen is deze changeset rijp voor een revert.

Bovendien was de reinforced_slope reeds correct op de map weergegeven, evanals de naastliggende grasstrook.
Leo Slager (2026-07-14 10:27:13+00:00): Reverted with my changeset 185707912
bxl-forever (2026-07-13 22:46:47+00:00): Hello,

The names of those restaurant look weird. ALL CAPS names which are usually the name of the city. It looks like a broken import of some database.

Also: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14011479678
* I don’t think there is any official street name matching this: "addr:street"="740 Contour Cial Régional Belle Epine - 740 Rue du Luxembourg Centre commercial Belle Epine - Accès Quai de livraison côté Seine (avec monte-charge direct au kiosque)"
Nathanaël Martel (2026-07-23 17:01:50+00:00): c’est clairement un erreur, désolé. Je prendrais plus de temps pour être plus précis
rajdhani (2026-07-15 05:49:23+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185762163
felipeeugenio (2026-07-14 01:01:21+00:00): Hola. Cuál es el motivo de borrar ese número? Está incorrecto?
Saludos
felipeeugenio (2026-07-14 13:25:07+00:00): Elemento borrado fue recuperado.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185681481
woodpeck (2026-07-13 23:47:10+00:00): "#hotosm-project-54621 Mapping buildings for #EbolaDRC2026 #msf #missingmaps" is not a sufficient explanation for a changeset that deletes 250 buildings. Please explain why they were deleted. Was there a bug in the original HOT projects ("#hotosm-project-5660 #osm_cd #ebola2018", "Ituri buildings import #hotosm-project-10928 #MissingMaps #HOTOSM #OSMRDC #HumanitarianGC") in which these buildings were created? Is your deletion a sign that maybe other contributions made in these projects should be examined and possibly deleted?
StreetSurveyor (2026-07-13 22:55:20+00:00): I cleaned this up a bit by using links to achieve the intended intersection layout. If you compare it with the state GIS, Newton St and West Roxbury Parkway form an “X” configuration. The previous mapping didn’t reflect that layout.
cubbe8 (2026-07-13 23:00:18+00:00): The intersection was recently reconstructed. The layout was mapped as such
StreetSurveyor (2026-07-13 23:08:21+00:00): Thanks for the clarification. I surveyed the intersection today and updated it to match the current on-the-ground layout, although it looks like you’ve already changed it back. From a roadway connectivity standpoint, the layout you mapped doesn’t make sense, as the named roads weren’t connected in a way that reflects how the intersection actually functions. My edit was based on both the field survey and the state GIS.
ajmat (2026-07-15 05:27:49+00:00): Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185761321
bxl-forever (2026-07-13 22:41:23+00:00): Hello,

It looks like you mechanically imported an entire list obtained on the website of the brand… but this list contains data that goes against OSM tagging and naming conventions.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14011508637
* +0763347520 is not a valid international phone number. French numbers start with +33.
* "Mondeville cedex" is not the name of the city
* In general, addresses should not be repeated to POI, especially city names and post codes, which are automatically obtained by the existing zones.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14011508634
* "addr:city"="CANNES" should not be written in ALL CAPS. Yes, the source data is dirty, but the responsability of anyone running an official data import is precisely to clean up the data sent to the OSM server.
* "cuisine"="Italian; sandwich" Values should be written in lower case
iandees (2026-07-14 01:33:56+00:00): Hey! Welcome to OSM. Thanks for updating your data. Can I ask how you found us and what made you decide to fix the data? We're trying to make it easier for business owners to fix the data on their business and your input would help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185682286
alpacaMaps (2026-07-15 00:50:04+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
alpacaMaps (2026-07-28 01:42:30+00:00): This changeset adds one or more surveillance cameras in a spot that looks unlikely — the nodes sit well away from any road, which usually means the cameras aren't physically present on the ground.

If these cameras are real, please let us know so the map stays accurate. Otherwise, we'd kindly ask that you avoid adding cameras that aren't actually there, and that you remove any temporary or test nodes once you're done.

If this was simply a mistake, no problem at all — just clean up the nodes that don't correspond to a real-world camera, and leave a quick note here so we can help.

Thanks for helping keep OpenStreetMap accurate.

— alpacaMaps
_srelemorele (2026-07-13 23:37:47+00:00): In this discussion, literally no one has said that you're right and that your change is the right one. Well.
Yog Sot (2026-07-14 00:11:41+00:00): you're inexperience and don't even know what are values of access tags, so start with something easy. There is a lot that is not mapped. But do not participate in adit wars, read the quidelines.