piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2023-10-23 09:29:11+00:00): Beste,
Het is fijn dat je helpt met bushaltes. Kan ik u een of twee dingen leren?

Als de naam zoiets bevat als "perron 8", dan is de publieke naam ("name") van de halte de korte vorm: "Diksmuide Station".  En dan voegen we de technische naam toe als "name:De_Lijn=Diksmuide Station perron 8".

De referentiecodes van De Lijn worden altijd opgeslagen als "ref:De_Lijn".  Negeer het "ref" tekstvak volledig en typ de code altijd in de tag lijst onderaan.

Groeten.
DCools (2023-10-23 11:36:54+00:00): Thx, ik hou er rekening mee!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 05:04:31+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046525
woodpeck (2023-10-24 10:27:57+00:00): Dear Turid Nordbye, in this changeset you have (again) removed a path that you would prefer not to exist (the one that connects Sprengsneset to the path network in the West); extensive community discussion in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/request-for-assistance-from-the-norwegian-community-in-the-resolution-of-a-mapping-dispute/104524/38 had previously shown that the community prefers to keep the path.

I have restored the path now. Please do not delete it again, or else your account will have to be suspended for vandalism.

Best regards, Frederik Ramm - OSMF Data Working Group - Ticket#2023102410000017
Turid Nordbye (2023-10-24 16:44:08+00:00): Vandalisme! Hvem er det som utøver det? Folk som tar seg til rette og andre som oppfordrer til tråkk over privat eiendom ved å legge inn sti over annen manns eiendom i kart?
Wulfmorn (2023-10-24 22:21:16+00:00): Som sagt, dette er en kamp du må ta i kommune eller rett, ikke i OSM.
woodpeck (2023-10-25 10:22:22+00:00): Blocked user Turid Nordbye in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15263 as advertised.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 05:03:45+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046511
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 05:02:26+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046495
ygcgjp5 (2024-02-10 08:17:19+00:00): Beveik visur sugadinti skirtingų krypčių greičio ribojimai. Atšaukiu pakeitimą.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 05:02:02+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046485
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 05:01:52+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046481
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 04:53:29+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046322
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 04:53:02+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046317
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-24 04:52:51+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143046315
odinhm (2024-04-13 02:09:00+00:00): Why did this changeset delete so many businesses? I was trying to search for a closed KIWI,, but had difficulty finding it because it had been deleted completely. Can the deleted edits in this changeset be reverted and changed to just be disguised and marked as "vacant" instead?
NKA (2024-04-13 07:12:00+00:00): Butikkene som ble fjernet her finnes ikke lenger, i følge Norgesgruppen, og da skal de ikke være i OSM lenger. De store kjedene legger hvert kvartal ned et antall butikker (og åpner nye).

Selv om man setter på shop=vacant så vil jo butikknavnet forsvinne, og da blir ikke butikken søkbar lenger. Og det er vrient å fastslå (uten å være på bakken) om lokalet i det hele tatt finnes lenger eller om det er revet, om det allerede er tatt i bruk av andre osv.

Om du forklarer hva du bruker nedlagte butikker til så kan vi se om det finnes en løsning.
odinhm (2024-04-13 08:29:15+00:00): Hei, takk for svar.

Ut ifra det jeg kan se, så skal man bruke "disued" prefiksen på butikker som er lagt ned: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/67728/how-do-i-denote-a-business-is-not-yet-open-or-has-shut-down

Her er ett eksempel på hvordan jeg har gjort det på en butikk som har stengt permanent:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/741322172

Når jeg gjorde det på den måten, så forsvant den bare fra kartet og den kommer ikke opp med mindre du eksplisitt søker etter navnet hvor den også blir merket som "Vacant shop". Da har fremdelse den siste versjonen av node-IDen all informasjonen om butikken som var der selv om den er fjernet fra kartet.

Grunnen til at jeg er interessert i at informasjonen til nedlagte bedrifter ikke skal fjernes helt, er fordi https://prices.openfoodfacts.org/app/ bruker OSM node-IDer til å assosiere butikker til priser på produkter i databasen sin, og jeg har ett par kvitteringer som jeg holder på å gjøre klar til å importeres til databasen deres som kommer fra butikker som nå er lagt ned.
NKA (2024-04-13 09:58:45+00:00): Det er ikke helt enkelt:

Som du ser her skal man fjerne alle de gamle taggene som hørte til butikken når den går over til shop=vacant:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant

Et annet problem er at id'er i OSM uansett ikke er persistente, f.eks. når noen velger å flytte taggene fra en node og over til en bygning.

Dessuten vil den noden du har linket til få ny id ved neste adresseoppdatering, fordi noen har flettet addr-taggene til sammen med andre tagger, som vi i Norge har besluttet å ikke gjøre ...

Jeg tror det er enklere å søke opp gamle butikker i den databasen/app'en du linket til, og så finne den gamle OSM-id'en der. De bør lage noe slikt om det ikke finnes.

Skriv gjerne et innlegg på den norske delen av community.openstreetmap.org om du vil få forslag/ideer fra andre.
odinhm (2024-04-13 10:43:06+00:00): Ok, det hadde jeg ikke fått med meg. Nei, da ser jeg ikke helt poenget med disused og vacant taggene fremfor å bare fjerne alt.

Åja, trodde IDene nodene hadde var mer statisk og fulgte med selv når større endringer ble gjort.

Vet ikke helt hva du mener med at addr-taggene er flettet sammen med andre tagger.

Nei, tror ikke det er mulighet for noe sånt in Open Prices nettsiden enda, men kan prøve å ta det opp med de. Nettsiden/appen er ikke helt ferdig lansert/laget enda.

Skal lage en bruker på forumet og ta en kikk på det seinere. Takk for tipset!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-21 22:55:28+00:00): DWG rvert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142942863
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-22 09:53:51+00:00): note that say https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/278472603/history is not yet fixed - is it queued for reverts or would it help to revert such cases once spotted?

See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-about-limit-new-accounts/101656/240
user_5359 (2023-10-23 04:49:08+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/node/11280003020. What is the mean of the tag 25B = 33?
Alex_Mapper (2023-10-21 23:29:36+00:00): Boas, nesta zona deixaste algumas ways desconectadas, foi proprositado ou há algo a impedir a passagem?
(por exemplo a way 810059492)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142935117
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-10-22 21:01:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 142985869 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
eggie (2023-10-21 19:09:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback... Dit is wel een erg groot gebied om een adres te veranderen. 
Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Is de naam van de school Scholencomplex?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-10-21 19:16:43+00:00): name=Scholencomplex verwijderd..  
adres verwijderd.
Als die school echt zo heet laat het even weten. 
Er is al een adresnode.
MVG
eggie
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-10-22 21:01:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 142985869 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-10-22 21:01:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 142985869 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-10-22 21:01:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 142985869 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
eggie (2023-10-21 19:12:05+00:00): Dag Frienship. Alle begin is moeilijk Kijk even hier hoe parkeermogelijkheden worden gemapt in OSM
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
parking_space is een parkeervak in een amenity=parking.
MVG
eggie
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-10-22 21:01:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 142985869 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
GUA1975 (2023-10-21 18:14:58+00:00): Terror Supporters are not accepted
yrtimiD (2023-10-21 18:08:16+00:00): your vandalism is meaningless and will be easily reverted, don't spent your time on this stupid action.
Amg84 (2023-10-21 18:26:54+00:00): No politics please
zstadler (2023-10-23 07:26:03+00:00): This changeset seems to be reverted by changeset 142939797
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2024-07-31 20:47:02+00:00): Was ist die Grundlage der foot=no?
Als ich vor knapp 2 Jahren dort vor Ort war, standen dort keine Verbote, nach denen das Verlassen des Seitentals Richtung Waldweg jenseits der B10 nicht erlaubt gewesen wäre, zu Fuß oder Per Rad oder sonst was:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=49.20796%2C7.78665%3B49.20724%2C7.78547#map=18/49.20762/7.78599
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2024-07-31 20:55:06+00:00): Sogar recht aktuell: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=49.20769200000001&lng=7.788374999999974&z=19.714099774180713&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&focus=photo&pKey=3273341196131034&x=0.4533315341380892&y=0.6019607591742347&zoom=0 Kein Verbot dort, wenn man von rechts kommt
nodofi9184 (2023-10-21 18:31:16+00:00): There is no country called Israel & Free Palestine
osmoj (2023-10-21 18:28:42+00:00): Resolves note#3951749
RedAuburn (2023-12-13 23:53:02+00:00): please don't do this, the road way should follow the centreline of the road
zstadler (2023-10-22 11:25:38+00:00): This is a vandal edit and the user was blocked by the DWG.
It was was reverted in changeset 142963410
zstadler (2023-10-22 11:16:00+00:00): This changeset seems to be reverted by changeset 142939922
eggie (2023-10-21 19:13:43+00:00): Hier is het wel correct

Kijk nog even naar je vorige edits svp.
Groet
eggie
zstadler (2023-10-22 11:14:51+00:00): This changeset seems to be reverted by changeset 142939922
zstadler (2023-10-22 11:14:10+00:00): This edit seems to be reverted by changeset 142939922
zstadler (2023-10-22 11:08:41+00:00): This changeset seems to be reverted by changeset 142939911
zstadler (2023-10-22 11:07:56+00:00): This changeset seems to be reverted by changeset 142939900
Реdактор (2023-10-22 05:09:12+00:00): Прошу прощения, не Новодмитровская а Новодмитровская:( извините
Реdактор (2023-10-22 06:13:06+00:00): Новодмитриевская
zstadler (2023-10-22 11:06:33+00:00): This changeset seems to be reverted by changeset 142939883
osmoj (2023-10-21 18:39:23+00:00): Resolves note#3657295
osmoj (2023-10-21 19:07:46+00:00): Mh, just noticed that the information I added is already tagged to the highway.
Undid this changeset in changeset/142937230 therefore.
SomeoneElse (2023-11-02 11:36:03+00:00): Hello,

I'm writing this message to both of the participants in the "edit war" on https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/601817622 .

Clearly you disagree about how this should be tagged.  However, I've not seen a comment from either of you explaining why you think that your tag (park or garden) is correct.

If either of you can link to pictures (perhaps from Mapillary or Bing StreetSide, if available) that backs up why you think it is best tagged in a certain way, please do link to them.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2023-11-02 11:36:30+00:00): Hola,

Estoy escribiendo este mensaje a los dos participantes en la "guerra de edición" en https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/601817622.

Es evidente que no está de acuerdo sobre cómo se debe etiquetar esto. Sin embargo, no he visto ningún comentario de ninguno de ustedes explicando por qué creen que su etiqueta (parque o jardín) es correcta.

Si alguno de ustedes puede vincular imágenes (tal vez de Mapillary o Bing StreetSide, si están disponibles) que respalden por qué cree que es mejor etiquetarlas de cierta manera, vincúlelas.

Atentamente,

Andy Townsend, en nombre del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM.
ovruni (2023-11-03 07:50:27+00:00): Hello Andy

The way in question does not contain any internal structure for recreational purposes such as benchs, footways, sport fields, etc. This way simply contains some areas with some flowers inside. You can see this in the images of Kaart that were taken for Mapillary this year https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-12.046049875824565&lng=-76.96898893119999&z=17.589952338224016&pKey=2184397891768192&focus=photo&x=0.3402235701973785&y=0.6523592864038291&zoom=2.1228813559322033

On the other hand, the reverted edition is one of several where the user Favio Duran was adding/changing several ways as leisure=park initially, and then changing them as leisure=garden, even adding garden:type=grass https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/569099158, suggesting this is not an error on the user's part. The user has also been invited to participate in the OSM community telegram group in Peru and has only responded with a "No thanks" https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141232517

Both this year's editions and the previous year's editions are similar to those from 5 years ago where the user was adding several fictitious parks and bodies of water, as well as in a couple of adjacent buildings where plant_nursery,forest,park were first added/modified. https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/550969412 https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/563664309, soccer fields as parks https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/601091075, etc. Greater detail with the rest of the changesets with this pattern can be found at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pe/2023-September/000930.html
Best Regards
Favio Duran (2023-11-03 20:20:12+00:00): Buenas tardes, adjunto un par de links con las imágenes tomadas hoy in situ, hasta donde yo se una estructura publica lo establece la autoridad competente de la zona ¿o lo hacen unas bancas?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TJjVG4dXpoWsWwIiTDgTibhd6earjdze/view?usp=drive_link

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TCfTqWn9yb0n4LkfjSgYldHB9luxs49J/view?usp=drive_link

Se actualiza mapa de acuerdo a los indicado por la placa instalada hace ya casi 15 años, (PARQUE).
ovruni (2023-11-03 21:34:01+00:00): Hola, el etiquetado se hace en base a la característica que tiene un objeto, para esto existe documentación en la wiki de OSM [0] y existen diferentes comunidades de usuarios en diferentes países (a donde lo he invitado anteriormente a participar) que enriquecen la misma con sus propuestas. El etiquetado no se hace en base al nombre (el cual se ha mantenido para este objeto) o a lo que alguna autoridad plantease que funcione un área en un futuro. Por otra parte, en sus conjuntos de cambios hay decenas de pequeñas áreas que el usuario había etiquetado como parque ( por ejemplo https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/595648330 ), también canchas de fútbol (por ejemplo https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/601091075 ) y otras mas grandes que se etiquetaron sin siquiera ser parques (como en esta edición donde el usuario agregó cerca de 30 parques adyacentes en los terrenos del aeropuerto https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62316215 )
Finalmente, el usuario parece no esperar a ninguna respuesta sobre esta discusión y ha cambiado la vía a parque nuevamente ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143590223 , donde a su vez solamente se indica "Santa anita City" [1] ) sin cumplir la vía esta función, por lo que voy a restaurar la etiqueta.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dpark
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
SomeoneElse (2023-11-03 22:51:34+00:00): > Finalmente, el usuario parece no esperar a ninguna respuesta sobre esta discusión y ha cambiado la vía a parque nuevamente

... and you've changed it back!
SomeoneElse (2023-11-05 10:51:20+00:00): Based on the images posted above, it does look more like a "garden" than a "park" to me.
amadvance (2023-10-24 15:28:13+00:00): Ciao ValeBG

Per rispondere al tuo dubbio, dipende del perché è chiuso. Se il passaggio è impossibile per eventi naturali, conviene mettere "destroyed:highway=path". In questo modo è come se fosse cancellato, ma rimane traccia della cosa.

Comunque se puoi, aggiungi una "note=" che spiega il problema.

Oltre "detroyed", c'è anche "abandoned" e "disused".

Vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Ciao,
Andrea
edvac_repair (2023-10-22 00:30:18+00:00): Reverted for mass vandalism. Ticket#2023102110000246

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142944378
peyot (2023-11-01 16:43:57+00:00): Bonjour, Pourquoi déclarer ce chemin (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/179117159) du parc comme un rond point ? Il n'est pas en sens unique !
pyrog (2023-11-01 18:11:25+00:00): Rien à voir avec un sens unique.

C'est pour éviter que l'éditeur de relation de JOSM ne détecte une  discontinuité dans un itinéraire.

Une autre solution consisterait à couper le "rond point" et là pas besoin de ce tag pour contourner ce "bug" de JOSM.

Yves
peyot (2023-11-01 18:30:55+00:00): Merci pour cette réponse rapide !

Il est dommage de créer une carte erronée pour résoudre un problème d'éditeur.  Le tag "junction=roundabout" sous-entend "oneway=yes". Ce qui n'est pas vrai ici.
Il serait donc bien de trouver une autre solution ;-)

Pierre
pyrog (2023-11-01 18:37:46+00:00): - Ecrire un ticket pour corriger JOSM.
- découper le "rond"

D'un côté la mise à jour des itinéraires consomme beaucoup de (mon) temps et d'énergie.

D'un autre, l'impact sur un éventuel guidage piéton me semble mineur.
pyrog (2023-11-02 16:32:55+00:00): J'ai corrigé la plupart des cas en France.
Il reste ceux-ci qui sont pour la plupart cyclables et peut-être en sens unique ? https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1COg
peyot (2023-11-03 06:43:51+00:00): Top ! Merci.

Pierre
silversurfer83 (2023-10-21 19:48:21+00:00): Hi there :)

welcome to OSM.

Now I'm curious. What's at this point? Is there a new house?

cheers
silversurver83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142937685
schweigsame Rose (2023-10-21 19:56:18+00:00): Hi
Yes, there is a new house.
Got problems while edit by browser.
silversurfer83 (2023-10-21 20:07:06+00:00): Ok
In that case I hope the trouble will stop and you can properly map the new buildings.

Happy Mapping
osmoj (2023-10-21 19:24:04+00:00): Resolves note#3951747
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 02:52:39+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143953969
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 02:52:36+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143953968
Leo Slager (2023-10-21 21:09:07+00:00): Dag Ted, 
ik kan deze changeset eenvoudig reverten. Dan kun je overnieuw beginnen.
Is dat de gewenste oplossing ?
Leo Slager (2023-10-21 21:16:38+00:00): shop verwijderd en turning_circle toegevoegd.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 02:50:20+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143953933
tajoced719 (2023-10-21 21:43:21+00:00): There is no country called Israel  &  Free Palestine
woodpeck_repair (2023-12-14 09:30:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145103736 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits einer Sockenpuppe des gesperrten beautifulplaces, s. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15485
opendcc (2024-03-10 20:40:22+00:00): Hast Du die vor Ort angesehen?
Wesir (2024-03-11 09:29:12+00:00): Ja, natürlich - besichtigt und bespielt.
opendcc (2024-03-11 12:25:31+00:00): Ich frage wegen dem Surface-Tag. Da war asphalt getagged und mir kam das gestern eher wie Sand/feiner Split vor. Ebenso war der Weg von der Tiefgarage bis zum Ausgang Tor als nicht befestigt getagged, ist aber definitiv abschnittsweise paving stones.

Servus
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 02:48:43+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143953909
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-12-01 07:32:13+00:00): Hi angolasandy, 
please pay attention to place nodes that you are removing, they have their purpose and that is to define what type of place this is. Now you have put just a name on a residential area, so no one knows if this represents a village, town, city, etc. Can you go back and revert your changes or at least put a place tag back on land areas, but be sure that you know the exact extent of the area that this place is covering
VisibleSouth (2023-12-01 10:52:01+00:00): Let's call it a hamlet (added tag place_hamlet).
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 02:46:22+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143953871
Supaplex030 (2023-11-01 15:02:40+00:00): Hallo Fumasu, du hast hier vermutlich ausversehen einen Weg gelöscht, der aber tatsächlich existiert, da offenbar sehr neu. Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3967733.
Fumasu (2023-11-01 17:56:05+00:00): Das stimmt, danke für den Hinweis. Da waren die neusten Mapillary-Aufnahmen wohl nicht neu genug.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 02:46:13+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143953868
geisthugo123 (2025-03-13 22:41:06+00:00): Warum hast du Way:250081273 mit access no getaggt. Hat sich da was getan bis heute?
Matze_MaGl (2025-03-14 05:53:05+00:00): Hi, access=no war m.W. bereits getaggt. Ich dachte in Kombination mit highway=bicycle impliziert das den Fall, das dort nur Fahrräder erlaubt sind.
Beste Grüße
Matze_MaGl (2025-03-14 05:59:08+00:00): Es schaut aus als hätte der access=no einfach entfernt werden können, wenn highway=cycleway (im ersten Kommentar falsch benannt) ist und der Radweg ganz normal befahrbar ist. (Was hier m.W der Fall ist)
Ist die Annahme korrekt?
geisthugo123 (2025-03-14 13:54:13+00:00): Ja muss dann entfernt werden, access no verbietet grundsätzlich immer den way, egal als was der way gemappt ist.
Habe ich jetzt aktualisiert.
Matze_MaGl (2025-03-14 14:08:58+00:00): Prima, vielen Dank für die Info und Lösung!
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2024-06-27 19:29:10+00:00): Hi, about access of this gate. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5910633291

Just a small heads-up. bicycle=yes and foot=yes override access=private. They shouldn't be added if the access is private. Vehicles can't pass here anyway so they make no sense. I'll fix it, but just so you know for the future that there is a general access tag and others override its value for the particular mode of transport.

I've verified that there is a code lock on the gate.
mmd (2023-10-22 08:26:52+00:00): Seems like you've reverted to another vandalized version of the data: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210662937/history
zstadler (2023-10-22 11:13:19+00:00): Hello jeslop,

Thank you for helping revert the valdal edits in Israel.

In order to be able to quickly understand the need for reverting a changeset, in the future please try to add a comment in the discussions of reverted changesets

Thanks,
Zeev
jeslop (2023-10-22 21:03:00+00:00): That's right. Thanks for advice zstadler.
Firefishy (2023-10-24 07:23:32+00:00): This revert looks incomplete to me. Trick set here to fix correctly.
zstadler (2023-10-24 08:10:20+00:00): Hi All,

A major revert of the recent vandalism is still on-going.

Please avoid fixing things in parallel as this could further damage the revert efforts.

You can follow the situation on the community channel
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vandalism-and-blocks-in-israel/105176
and in the OSM Israel Telegram channel
https://t.me/OSM_Israel

Thanks,
Zeev
baeuchle (2023-11-01 20:05:01+00:00): Hallo aha_ev, dieser Änderungssatz hat ein paar Wege kaputt gemacht; scheinbar ist da was schief gelaufen. Es ist für mich ein wenig schwierig, heraus zu finden, was dabei eigentlich gemacht werden sollte, daher habe ich ihn vorerst komplett zurückgedreht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143494075
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-13 02:46:11+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143953866
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-23 05:28:15+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142998845