piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChrissW-R1 (2025-03-04 22:28:01+00:00): Thanks for the revert @woodpeck_repair
ChrissW-R1 (2025-03-04 22:28:10+00:00): Thanks for the revert @woodpeck_repair
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-04 09:31:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 163193168 where the changeset comment is: Golf von ...-Witzeleien von ChrissW-R1 revertiert, s. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163106037
ChrissW-R1 (2025-03-04 22:27:25+00:00): Thanks for the revert @woodpeck_repair
Herwescheluc (2025-03-02 18:02:29+00:00): Hallo, ChrissW-R1,

ich hoffe, das ist nur ein vorübergehender Scherz, oder? Darf ich erwarten, das Du das für alle Deine "Neubenennungen" wieder änderst? Sowas hat in OSM keinen Platz!

Viele Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
MonHeadfree (2025-03-03 23:20:24+00:00): Hi Andreas,

thanks I already informed the DWG.

Greetings
MHF
ChrissW-R1 (2025-03-04 22:23:11+00:00): Hallo @woodpeck_repair,

thanks for the revert.

@Herwescheluc nein ich habe dies nicht als Scherz gemeint. Bin jedoch mit einem Revert einverstanden.

VG
Chriss
Herwescheluc (2025-03-02 17:37:32+00:00): Hallo, ChrissW-R1,

ich hoffe, das ist nur ein vorübergehender Scherz, oder? Darf ich erwarten, das Du das für alle Deine "Neubenennungen" wieder änderst? Sowas hat in OSM keinen Platz!

Viele Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
MonHeadfree (2025-03-03 23:20:19+00:00): Hi Andreas,

thanks I already informed the DWG.

Greetings
MHF
woodpeck (2025-03-04 10:00:16+00:00): Hallo ChrissW-R1, ich verstehe ja, dass man (vielleicht gerade zur Faschingszeit) über solche Trumpismen lieber lacht als sich zu grämen, trotzdem ist OSM kein Platz für solche Witze. (Irgendjemand irgendwo freut sich schon, Deine Aktion als "Beweis" dafür zu nehmen, dass man sich auf OSM ja nicht verlassen kann.) Leite doch Deine Energien in sowas wie https://gulfof.mapquest.com/?name=ChrissW-R1 - dann können wir alle darüber lachen. Edits revertiert - DWG-Ticketnummer folgt
woodpeck (2025-03-04 10:45:37+00:00): DWG Ticket#2025030410000252
ChrissW-R1 (2025-03-04 22:21:46+00:00): Hallo woodpeck,

ich bitte um Entschuldigung. Ich sehe zwar nicht den Punkt, dass man OpenStreetMap jetzt als "weniger verlässlich" ansehen könnte.

@Herwescheluc nein ich habe dies nicht als Scherz gemeint. Bin jedoch mit einem Revert einverstanden.

VG
Chriss
_justanotherguy_ (2025-04-13 06:07:51+00:00): Hi!

I just wanted to ask about some of the changes you've made around Samford in this changeset. From what I gather, by "incorrect addr:suburb" you are referring to instances where an element's `addr:suburb` tag is different from the administrative boundary it falls in.

While this makes sense, for some elements I don't think it's that straightforward to remove them. Below is a list of the changes you've made the to elements around Samford and my thoughts on each. I would appreciate your input into whether the two addresses on Narrien Court should be 'Samford Village' or 'Samford Valley' and why.

- Samford Smiles, Samford => correct, should be 'Samford Village', but I don't think 'Samford' was so incorrect as to warrant removal
- Samford Valley Medical Centre, Samford => correct, should be 'Samford Village', but I don't think 'Samford' was so incorrect as to warrant removal
- 15A Narrien Court, Samford Village => dubious, I believe it should be 'Samford Village', but there is a strong argument for 'Samford Valley'
- 15B Narrien Court, Samford Village => dubious, I believe it should be 'Samford Village', but there is a strong argument for 'Samford Valley'
- 2 Camjo Court, Samford Valley => correct, should be 'Yugar'
- Samford Golden Valley Pony Club, Samford Valley => correct, should be 'Wights Mountain'

You've also removed the tags for `addr:state` and `addr:postcode` for each of these elements, which were, as far as I can tell, tagged correctly. I would also appreciate some insight into why you made these removals.

Thanks!
SomeoneElse (2025-12-14 00:48:35+00:00): Hello,
I'm a bit confused by the change here to https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/224164207 - the cycleway by the side of the road is now "bicycle=no; foot=no".  That seems unlikely?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2025-12-14 00:50:12+00:00): (see also comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145120734 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141126341 )
Dominic Findlay (2025-12-14 02:23:51+00:00): Hi, 
They moved the cyclist pick up point earlier in the year, closing the path alongside road at the time.

I used the cycle service when this happened, supposedly the reason is unsafe levels of pollution, and they had been wanting to move it for years. 

The path is still there, but you aren't meant to use it. I'm not sure if they have since physically blocked it off with a gate or fence.


https://i0.wp.com/www.haveringcyclists.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/477089817_1052783200197528_5504074524003427433_n.jpg
Dominic Findlay (2025-12-15 11:48:25+00:00): Also I'd add, the path is rendered in grey instead of the blue or red. 

Which I think correctly shows its there but not accessible
Dominic Findlay (2026-01-10 16:00:05+00:00): I had just been to both sides of the path.

No cycling and no pedestrians signs have been added to the entrances to this path.
Dominic Findlay (2026-01-10 16:00:34+00:00): No fence or gates however
SomeoneElse (2026-01-11 21:50:41+00:00): Thanks!
StreetSurveyor (2026-04-15 00:24:19+00:00): Hello, I’m not sure where the name “Horne St” was sourced from, but the buildings along this segment are clearly addressed as Sprague Street. Additionally, the city map shows this as an offshoot of Sprague Street rather than a separately named road.

Please rely on verifiable sources such as official signage or municipal GIS data, and avoid adding unsupported or unverified street names.
RunJennyRunUSA (2026-04-19 13:48:44+00:00): 100% of my changes are made within 24hrs of running the streets and seeing the street signs with my own eyes. I do not make changes based on web information. Since you keep undoing my changes based on your "verifiable sources", I will upload a time-stamped photograph from now on.
StreetSurveyor (2026-04-19 14:32:31+00:00): Thanks for taking the time to survey in person—I appreciate that level of effort and your willingness to provide photo evidence.

I also ran this segment after your edit and did not observe any street sign indicating “Horne St.” The buildings along this stretch are addressed as Sprague Street, and the municipal GIS/city map reflects this as an offshoot rather than a separately named road.

It’s possible that “Horne” refers to a building or property name rather than the roadway itself, which can sometimes be mistaken for a street sign in the field.

I’m not reverting based on preference, but on consistency with addressing and authoritative mapping sources. If you can share the time-stamped photo, I’m happy to review and reconcile it with the existing data so we can ensure the map reflects what’s actually on the ground.
SomeoneElse (2025-03-02 13:37:55+00:00): Hello - I think that the new bit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1363939186 needs adding to a couple of relations - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1695404#map=19/52.348209/-1.403282 shows the gap in one of them.
Best Regards,
Andy
AndyB_66 (2025-03-02 11:13:47+00:00): Stosuj się, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
AndyB_66 (2025-03-02 11:13:34+00:00): Stosuj się, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
felipeeugenio (2025-03-02 12:24:10+00:00): Hola.
Hice varias correcciones en este sector. La idea es que veas cómo se hace.
Muchas gracias por tus ediciones.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163107561
AndyB_66 (2025-03-02 11:13:22+00:00): Stosuj się, proszę, do zasad komentowania zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
felipeeugenio (2025-03-02 12:12:21+00:00): Hola. Por favor si algo está mal ubicado, moverlo. No eliminarlo para hacer otro nodo. Se pierde todo el historial.


En todo caso no preocuparse, estos errores son comunes en quienes comienzan. Si está interesado, por favor unirse al chat de maperos de Chile. Hay incluso maperos de Nacimiento en el chat.
Puede unirse haciendo click en el link en mi perfil.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163107723
C_Var (2025-03-03 01:19:53+00:00): Hola. Y sí, tiene todo el sentido. Vi que estaba algo lejos y con otro tipo de estructura y me pareció más adecuada la que puse. Pero claro, también se puede modificar esto en la misma.
Gracias.
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-05 16:07:17+00:00): I re-terraced these buildings to try to help you out.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163107852
ArchangelEkim (2025-04-28 05:33:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1363948676/history

This is only used for utility poles there is no way for pedestrians to walk down. Can be confirmed by street imagery.
aharvey (2025-04-28 08:10:50+00:00): Thanks, I've re-added it as not:highway=path to prevent it being re-added by future mappers as such.

You can't really tell from the Mapillary or Bing Streetside image we can use. We can't use Google Street View for mapping due to licensing.
❤️‍🔥 (2026-06-20 06:40:22+00:00): hi andrew, i found another NSOOS site here: way/1530962462 - can we bend the pipeline route so it passes through this compound?

currently, the route goes underwater at quakers hat bay, which seems unlikely, because that would presumably require a syphon
aharvey (2026-06-20 08:08:39+00:00): nice find. we can update the pipeline route. It also seems that the junction is at Tunks Park, so the section from Wollstonecraft to Brightmore Reserve likely routes via Tunks Park.
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-02 06:42:21+00:00): Hi Twycross3, welcome to OSM!

It seems that the changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-04 09:14:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 163192568, 163192538, 163192541, 163192571, 163192552, 163192586, 163192574, 163192540, 163192577, 163192570, 163192564, 163192556, 163192561, 163192543, 163192545, 163192584, 163192576, 163192562, 163192550, 163192546, 163192580, 163192566, 163192572 where the changeset comment is: revert broken building import
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-02 06:42:59+00:00): Hi Twycross3, welcome to OSM!

It seems that the changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-04 09:14:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 163192568, 163192538, 163192541, 163192571, 163192552, 163192586, 163192574, 163192540, 163192577, 163192570, 163192564, 163192556, 163192561, 163192543, 163192545, 163192584, 163192576, 163192562, 163192550, 163192546, 163192580, 163192566, 163192572 where the changeset comment is: revert broken building import
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-02 06:43:11+00:00): Hi Twycross3, welcome to OSM!

It seems that the changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-04 09:14:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 163192568, 163192538, 163192541, 163192571, 163192552, 163192586, 163192574, 163192540, 163192577, 163192570, 163192564, 163192556, 163192561, 163192543, 163192545, 163192584, 163192576, 163192562, 163192550, 163192546, 163192580, 163192566, 163192572 where the changeset comment is: revert broken building import
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-02 06:43:23+00:00): Hi Twycross3, welcome to OSM!

It seems that the changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-04 09:14:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 163192568, 163192538, 163192541, 163192571, 163192552, 163192586, 163192574, 163192540, 163192577, 163192570, 163192564, 163192556, 163192561, 163192543, 163192545, 163192584, 163192576, 163192562, 163192550, 163192546, 163192580, 163192566, 163192572 where the changeset comment is: revert broken building import
woodpeck_repair (2025-03-04 09:14:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 163192568, 163192538, 163192541, 163192571, 163192552, 163192586, 163192574, 163192540, 163192577, 163192570, 163192564, 163192556, 163192561, 163192543, 163192545, 163192584, 163192576, 163192562, 163192550, 163192546, 163192580, 163192566, 163192572 where the changeset comment is: revert broken building import
pitscheplatsch (2025-03-02 06:43:44+00:00): Hi Twycross3, welcome to OSM!

It seems that the changeset you created includes nodes and ways without any tags. Could there have been an issue during the mapping process?

Looking forward to your response.

Thank you!
skfd (2025-03-08 23:16:56+00:00): fun project! are you also editing wikidata with this etymology connections? OSM relies alot on it for this kind of deep historic facts.
bphennessy (2025-03-09 04:15:15+00:00): Thanks! I haven't been editing wikidata so far but I'll definitely start doing it going forward :)
skfd (2025-03-09 04:31:46+00:00): here is a property you can set https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P138 and here is an example of a street you can edit: https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Q885416

much work to do for toronto. not every street even has a name
literan (2025-03-02 18:50:48+00:00): неверный формат адреса. Изучите пожалуйста, досконально, если вы правите адреса

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
literan (2025-03-02 18:51:40+00:00): и зачем вы здесь дворовый проезд частично уничтожили? поправьте сами за собой, пожалуйста
literan (2025-03-06 16:18:42+00:00): Вы будете исправлять за собой или нет?
addr: (2025-03-07 17:27:45+00:00): Обязательно исправлю, спасибо что написали
addr: (2025-03-07 17:37:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163337203

Проверьте пожалуйста
literan (2025-03-07 19:35:15+00:00): да, нормально
Frank Peng (2025-03-02 04:46:13+00:00): Correction: Changeset comment should have said "Added track speed limits on NS Blue Ridge District from Bedford to Lynchburg".
mcliquid (2025-03-02 08:16:41+00:00): Really just out of pure personal interest, away from OSM. Where is this abbreviation defined? I was still aware of “USA” until now. Or just “U.S.” in reference to the government, but without the “A”. And even with a quick internet search, I only find “USA” as the abbreviation used. I would find it interesting. Thank you!
Minh Nguyen (2025-03-02 17:03:16+00:00): U.S. is the preferred abbreviation of United States in American English. U.S.A. is the preferred abbreviation of United States of America, which is much more common overseas. Domestically, native speakers only use United States and U.S. in most contexts. U.S.A. only occurs for nationalistic emphasis, like at political rallies or sporting events.

Conventional abbreviations for countries and states in English aren’t defined by governments. Instead, dictionaries and style guides like the AP Stylebook (yes, the one that now includes guidance about a certain gulf) and Chicago Manual of Style include rules about these abbreviations and when to use them. These style guides differ on whether to include periods or not, even depending on context.

Within the U.S. federal government, the Government Publishing Office has its own GPO Style Manual, which specifies U.S.A. as a conventional abbreviation for United States of America, but notably the guide itself consistently uses U.S. throughout as an abbreviation of United States, even though it isn’t listed. Nevertheless, this style manual is only used in legal and administrative publications. [1]

The GPO dropped conventional state abbreviations decades ago in favor of ISO/ANSI/FIPS/USPS codes. On the state boundary relations, we’re putting those codes into dedicated keys or ref=*, reserving short_name=* for conventional abbreviations.

Wikipedia has a good overview of the various authorities for English style. [2]

I was considering swapping the short_name and alt_short_name keys, but I have no idea which one users are more likely to search for. Mainly I just wanted to correct the “U.S.A” which was missing a period. Unlike in some other languages, the last letter of an initialism needs a period too. But now that you mention it, we should list both U.S. and U.S.A. in short_name, since I don’t think 
alt_short_name is a recognized key.

[1] https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-STYLEMANUAL-2016/pdf/GPO-STYLEMANUAL-2016.pdf#page=261
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and_using_style_guides
Minh Nguyen (2025-03-02 21:41:02+00:00): Changeset 163139172 moves U.S.A. to short_official_name=*, which appears to be in use as well.
felipeeugenio (2025-03-02 12:42:47+00:00): Hola. Por favor no pegar parques a las calles.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163109659
felipeeugenio (2025-03-02 12:43:57+00:00): Hola. Pegó la vereda completa a una calle. Por favor cuidado con estas manipulaciones. Si desea recibir ayuda puede unirse al chat de la comunidad chilena de OSM en el link en mi perfil. No hay problemas con cometer errores, pero por favor cuidado.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163109659
Baloo Uriza (2025-03-10 13:58:46+00:00): Instead of "fixme=continue" it might be better to be slightly more descriptive, like "fixme=Stream continues."
user_21183540 (2025-07-17 11:52:28+00:00): My note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4829307 says that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1363976204 is the location of Ebenezer Brethren Assembly​. Are you sure that Prabhat Tara is at the correct location?
꼬물_Yu (2025-03-03 15:27:18+00:00): Thank you for the my edits error correction
꼬물_Yu (2025-03-03 15:28:55+00:00): However, there was a problem that I couldn't upload what I was working on, so could you help me?
꼬물_Yu (2025-03-03 15:36:10+00:00): please Get in touch with me as soon as possible.
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-03 15:39:24+00:00): Conflict while uploading? You use Go Map! ? If so, then you can download .osc to upload the server during the changes to the server, and open it in JOSM to eliminate the conflict.

Or when sending, manually update the version of this way by editing XML file

You can also contact me and other cartographers in Telegram chat https://t.me/openstreetmaporg
TrickyFoxy (2025-03-03 15:44:57+00:00): Or in https://discord.gg/openstreetmap
꼬물_Yu (2025-03-04 01:54:46+00:00): well.. I tried to fix errors with Josm, 
but the file does not open due to any error...
I'll check it out what was that josm error after work.. thank you (*˙˘˙)♡

+ 'll be able to contract on Discord! my username : komul_e
ჱ̒ ｰ̀֊ｰ́ )
ryivhnn (2025-03-03 01:28:03+00:00): I'm so sorry, my learning experiments are causing a lot of problems for you aren't they ^_^; I otherwise don't know what should be done with this door, it just connects to a room (or at least was supposed to, if it got flagged as almost junction I'm guessing something didn't connect).  Are rooms not routable?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163112022
TheSwavu (2025-03-03 21:31:48+00:00): Two out of about 3500 is not actually that many https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/graph.png?country=australia%2a&item=1270

The almost junction test will be looking for things like a corridor that end within 10m of some other highway as they might be errors. In this case it isn't, so noexit is to flag that it's OK.

What determines if a room is routable is the software you'd be using.
s777n (2025-03-02 09:12:14+00:00): Исправлено
TagaSanPedroAko (2025-03-08 10:32:25+00:00): The Batangas-Mindoro Interconnection will be a 230 kV line, or is the voltage changed in the latest TDP? The change to 500 kV lacks a source. What I can find from the updated NGCP TDP is that the line will be 230 kV.
eggie (2025-03-02 09:57:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback    Je hebt er een traumacentrum van gemaakt met hoteltag zonder naam?
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-03-02 10:02:56+00:00): Hier heb je een hoteltag zonder naam met een website www.berghoeve.nl/ ?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=163112721
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-03-02 10:06:26+00:00): De website zegt inderdaad nrv 20, maar je haalt de naam weg. Die heb ik teruggezet.
De rest van de ziekenhuistags heb ik verwijderd van 22.

MVG
eggie
rempshaener (2025-03-02 20:17:08+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Wenn es sich bei dem von dir bearbeiteten Abschnitt jetzt um eine Fahrradstraße handelt, gehören in der Regel noch einige weiter Angaben dazu.
Am einfachsten ist es, z. B. hier https://trafficsigns.osm-verkehrswende.org/DE einfach die Beschilderung „zusammenzuklicken“.

Das ergäbe dann z. B.:
highway=cycleway oder
highway=residential
vehicle=no
bicycle=designated
bicycle_road=yes
maxspeed=30
source:maxspeed=DE:bicycle_road
traffic_sign=DE:244.1

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
Xavizard Knight (2025-03-02 13:06:47+00:00): Hello! Your contributions of this changeset make no sense.

You've moved the translated inscription to a new tag "inscription:es-t-la"
This -t- setup is the first time that I heard about it, and despite it is used elsewhere (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=-t-), it seems undocumented (no wiki page nor anywhere else online talking about it that I could find).

I've done it with the "inscription:translation:es" because in taginfo there's also previous usage of the inscription:translation tag (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=inscription%3Atranslation; it was used in a "inscription:translation:pl" before my changeset) specifically for "inscription".
Besides the ":translation:" tag (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=%3Atranslation:translation), I personally think is cleared and easier to understand than language codes with a t in the middle.

Also, you've moved the name value to the description, deleted the multilingual descriptions and moved the Catalan description to the Spanish source (source:inscription:es).

May I ask your logic behind these changes?
mueschel (2025-03-02 13:28:06+00:00): What was in the name tag was a description of the plaque, but not a proper name.

All the "inscription:translation:es:description:XX" tags are  nothing else than the source of the translated transcription, so they should be in a source tag.

The -t- syntax is a standard also outside OSM for literally transformed text from one language to another.

In general, translations should not be in OSM - we're not a dictionary. On the other hand, one translation from Latin to the local language can for sure be helpful to understand what the POI is. 

If you prefer having the translation in "inscription:translation:es" instead, this is fine with me - although I'd prefer a 'description' tag.

I didn't move the Catalan description to a Spanish tag - there's only a Spanish translation and it's source tag, which is in Catalan.