piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2023-08-04 15:36:44+00:00): То есть получается, что фрагмент дороги, который вы удалили, является тропинкой?  
  
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=136744589
Frans S (2023-06-01 10:30:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark
 Buildings partially hidden under trees, are not drawn correctly. Extrapolate the rooflines please.
Best regards
rhtb0 (2023-05-30 14:49:58+00:00): 새로 개통된 도로는 관계를 추가해 주시고 출구와 톨게이트를 다음 편집에 추가해 주세요
mariotomo (2023-05-30 19:06:15+00:00): please can you and  your teacher or tutor find another way to learn whatever you are meant to learn? thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136746791
rhtb0 (2023-05-30 14:49:07+00:00): 다음에 편집하실때 관계도 추가해 주세요
mueschel (2023-05-31 18:04:23+00:00): Hi,
please be careful which data you upload to OSM. All the buildings in this changeset you already uploaded some days ago. I had to revert these changes.
ToniE (2023-09-01 09:52:09+00:00): Hallo Ulli,

ist hier eher zufällig das oneway=yes rein geraten?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131354853/history

Gruß
Toni
literan (2024-07-05 06:14:27+00:00): вы зачем-то этой правкой здание удалили. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12802086/history
https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#136747616

я восстановил
osmviborg (2023-05-30 15:18:01+00:00): Hej. Det giver ingen mening at tegne en sti oveni en der er der i forvejen. Revertet.
InfosReseaux (2023-09-11 21:56:34+00:00): Bonsoir

Pourquoi avoir modifié le waterway=* dans ce changeset ?
C'est bien une conduite en charge, ce n'est pas un canal.

Pouvez-vous rétablir waterway=pressurised sur l'ensemble des tronçons s'il vous plaît ?

Bonne soirée
Hb- (2025-07-21 14:41:46+00:00): Mostly reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169247609
Level=* and unnecessary points still to be deleted.
tunnel=culvert is for waterways where both ends are visible on the ground
InfosReseaux (2025-07-22 21:06:11+00:00): Hello and thank you

waterway=pressurised is also needed  on the headrace part, since the intake is below the water level. Both headrace and penstock are pressurised but usage=* allow to distinguish them.

Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169313978

Best regards
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-30 14:00:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2495017496
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534231583

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
danieldegroot2 (2023-05-31 16:59:01+00:00): Looks like some adjustments will be needed to the POI positions. Have you also taken new imagery?
b-unicycling (2023-05-31 17:54:49+00:00): No, I just walked from "attraction" to "attraction" and added them where they were. There were children in the playground; it felt awkward taking pictures.
danieldegroot2 (2023-05-31 18:54:07+00:00): Ah, okay. If it helps to see where things are, taking pictures from a distance -a bit outside the playground / from on the path- should be fine as long as you're just walking by.
The park could do with a little more imagery maybe but it isn't too bad, assuming there aren't many unmapped things there.

The POIs look a bit cluttered at the moment, the bottom left corner doesn't have the POIs in the right place at least. It may be helpful to take fieldpapers or Every Door to get a better idea of their location if it's not as easy to know/remember them well or if you just want to add them later.
Is the Esri imagery resembling how it looked like when you were there, or not?
b-unicycling (2023-06-01 08:09:24+00:00): Two attractions were fenced off, so I didn't map them, maybe that's why it looks a bit cluttered. And some were combinations of slide and climbing etc, they're probably better done as areas, but it was the first playground I ever mapped in detail.
danieldegroot2 (2023-06-02 22:19:57+00:00): No problem. You can always try visiting early in the morning or on a less sunny day.
Jordi MF (2023-05-30 17:02:57+00:00): ola MikelCalo,
Podries explicar per què mapeges els contactes de carrers amb una corba inicial o final? Per exemple, en estos casos: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22974548
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23700920
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142661207

per una altra banda, t'has deixat sense connectar un carrer per a vianants (Carrer de Catadau) amb el carrer perpendicular. El carrer per a vianants ha de fer contacte amb l'Avinguda de Tirso de Molina encara que hi haja un "bordillo" que separe la vorera amb la calçada:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144473699

Salutacions,
Jordi
MikelCalo (2023-05-30 22:58:05+00:00): No deuria de conectar-se a soles amb la vorera?
L’acces amb el carrer Tirso es al garatge que hi ha darrere de l’edifici
Jordi MF (2023-06-01 11:10:04+00:00): Si no s'ha mapejat la vorera, el carrer per a vianants ha de contactar amb la calçada per a que quede clar que una persona pot girar per eixe carrer.

Si s'ha mapejat la vorera el carrer de vianants haurà de contactar amb la calçada de la carretera si un cotxe pot accedir al carrer per a vianants gràcies a la vorera "rebaixada" (per a accedir a algun garatge o per a fer maniobres de càrrega i descàrrega permeses). En este cas, com que ja has mapejat la vorera i els cotxes no poden accedir, el carrer per a vianants ha d'acabar en la vorera (així ho van explicar a la comunitat d'usuaris d'OpenStreetMap de Telegram).

Salutacions,
Jordi
emersonveenstra (2023-05-31 13:44:39+00:00): Hi,

I've gone ahead and fixed this for you, but in the future, the multipolygon relation for the golf course is only for the outer boundaries, not everything inside of it
user_1566574 (2023-06-18 16:10:17+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre contribution !
Petite question : occupez-vous tout le bâtiment (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54185149) ou est-il aussi occupé par d'autres associations/habitants/bureaux ?

En attendant votre réponse, je complète l'intégration de votre radio à OSM sur ce point https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10940020180 grâce aux infos que je trouverais sur votre site.

Merci ! :)
maraf24 (2023-08-08 11:10:32+00:00): access=private here is a large mistake.
These roads are generally available for cyclists and pedestrians.
Even a motorcar can enter - for a small charge.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-06-27 16:25:58+00:00): bom dia, a fonte "mapa do municipio" não pode ser a unica, ja que muitos mapas assim mostram ruas que só existem em projeto e o openstreetmap se destina a mapear coisas que existem de fato, mas se as ruas existirem tudo bem :D
BCNorwich (2023-05-30 16:06:27+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You somehow placed the house tags on a node in the middle of a highway in the UK. Obviously wrong so I've removed it. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-05-30 16:08:53+00:00): Hi, Tag building=house added.
grzegorz75jan (2025-01-28 15:16:02+00:00): Narobiłeś gnoju od opisów zmian po spaprane edycje w tym pseudo relacje z budynków. Walidator wypluwa błędy krytyczne. Przerwałeś karierę (w sumie i dobrze bo mniej nowego syfu) a teraz niech sprzątają inni.
BCNorwich (2023-05-30 16:11:12+00:00): Hi, You now have two buildings tagged as number 187, could you please remove the incorrect one.

Thanks & Regards Bernard.
Emilius123 (2023-05-30 15:58:29+00:00): Schwere Geburt xD
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-15 14:58:40+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1161168765/history has building = 2509 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
OrcaDan (2025-08-18 15:32:24+00:00): That was a data entry error. Thank you for finding it and making the correction.
Supaplex (2023-11-02 12:16:08+00:00): Hi, 

I think you added a duplicate store.
There is already a 25 Degrees bar and restaurant
 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5041208469
AndresDuhour (2023-09-13 18:05:41+00:00): Buenas tardes! conecté el tramo de camino a la avenida maría eva duarte de perón y a la rotonda para que no esté flotante en el mapa. Igualmente dejé la etiqueta access=no.
Friendly_Ghost (2023-06-06 11:23:28+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137010216
osmdees (2024-01-01 13:35:49+00:00): Hi @Seetroll, war es beabsichtigt die Riedseen umzubenennen?
Friendly_Ghost (2023-06-06 11:22:05+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137010155
tcarlisle (2023-06-01 05:05:37+00:00): The official name is "Bell" Canyon.  All the signs, city website documentation, etc. list it as "Bell" not "Bells"   

Here is a link to a Google Street View of the "Bell" Canyon Preservation Trailhead Sign:  https://www.google.com/maps/@40.5719508,-111.8000785,3a,15y,127.34h,83.97t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sb18hO2NC3BObnLZ0zsQ2dA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136751827
Oregonian3 (2023-06-01 12:52:24+00:00): Oh interesting. Looks like the City disagrees with other organizations then on the official name. The USFS, the USGS, and the Utah Geologic Survey all list the official name as "Bells Canyon"

https://www.fs.usda.gov/recarea/uwcnf/recreation/hiking/recarea/?recid=9033&actid=50

https://geology.utah.gov/map-pub/survey-notes/utahs-glacial-geology/bells-canyon/

https://edits.nationalmap.gov/apps/gaz-domestic/public/search/names/1438584
Oregonian3 (2023-06-01 17:15:54+00:00): My thought would be that we should defer to the federal government's official name for the canyon rather than the city's official name. And also, when I talk to people about this canyon, every single person I know refers to the canyon as "Bells" rather than "Bell".

So my preference would be to keep the canyon, trail, and reservoirs labeled as "Bells", with the alt_name field specifying "Bell". But since the trailhead is signed "Bell" in the field then we should keep the trailhead as "Bell" with the alt-name "Bells". Any thoughts?
SherbetS (2023-08-28 01:37:09+00:00): Hi mcedith,

I changed the objects you tagged as man_made=communications_tower to man_made=mast. please read the wiki documentation about these tags:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcommunications_tower
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmast

--SherbetS
Friendly_Ghost (2023-06-06 11:09:09+00:00): Hello. I reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137009603 because it is in conflict with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments. Please comply with these guidelines in future edits.
Glassman (2023-05-31 21:15:16+00:00): #TIP: you can map the entire beach as an area. Makes the map rendering much nicer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136752339
TheSwavu (2023-06-05 07:15:50+00:00): Hi,

You appeared to have forgotten to add tags to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1177627406. 

Would you please review and add the other tags I have missed.

Thanks.
Pavans (2023-06-05 09:26:55+00:00): Thank you for pointing out the missing tag, I do see that we have missed updating the tag (indoor=yes), I have made the correct fix now. The feedback given is duly noted, I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you

Regards,
Pavans
mariotomo (2023-05-30 19:13:38+00:00): hi, I had a closer look at your contributions, and I decided it was easier to revert them than trying to understand how to integrate them in the map. you don't seem to have added any information, just messed a bit around, which isn't fine. so sorry. please get in contact.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136752643
silversurfer83 (2023-05-31 07:35:19+00:00): Hi Isabel,
I hope you read these messages.
I can understand that maybe "homework" isn't much fun and I have yet no idea, what your assingment is.
Please answer any of our comments with an explanation, it would help us understand.

Please be aware that you are currently editing an geographical database which is used by millions of people around the world each day. This is rather important to quite a few people (and businesses). We're glad about everybody who decides to help so should you be inclined to really help, let us know.

And please tell you teacher that it's not fine to fiddle with the osm database for fun

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136752643
habi (2023-05-30 15:44:55+00:00): Sorry, Pingpong-Tisch https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10940184890 in JOSM vergessen :)
literan (2023-05-30 16:42:35+00:00): 525 чего? людей?

если квартир, то это другой тег - building:flats
neo-plan (2023-10-17 21:12:22+00:00): Исправлю!
tuxfuzz (2023-08-31 00:53:54+00:00): Ciao, ho notato che hai effettuato diverse modifiche in zona, in qualche caso eliminando dati pre-esistenti, come ad es il dosso rallentatore (che non risulta più su mappa) in corrispondenza dell'attraversamento pedonale in Piazza Domenica Olivi, vicino a Suite 7 in centro a Breda di Piave.
Eliminare dati pre-esistenti va fatto sempre come estrema ratio perché si rischia sempre di perdere dati importanti o anche solo la cronologia di determinati punti di interesse (ad es i cambiamenti di proprietà dei negozi).
Consiglio una lettura della Wiki di OpenStreetMap prima di effettuare modifiche invasive. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Contribute_map_data
ezio_m (2023-09-06 10:51:13+00:00): ciao, grazie dei consigli
cercherò in futuro di evitare di eliminare elementi già esistenti. spesso mi capita di fare changeset di dimensioni ampie data la vecchiaia ormai a volte decennale dei dati nella mia zona
tuxfuzz (2023-09-09 22:23:35+00:00): Ciao, capisco .... anch'io vedo che ci sono molte cose da aggiornare ma preferisco procedere più lentamente per essere sicuro di inserire una cosa corretta, in modo che altri non debbano perdere tempo a tornarci sopra in tempi brevi.
Anch'io anni fa facevo changeset più grandi, poi ho iniziato a ridurli un po' in modo da poter controllare meglio la correttezza.
Rukkhadevata (2023-05-30 16:07:55+00:00): 大桥北路并未按照高速公路标准建设，也并非快速路的一部分，且末端存在行人可通过平交路口，因此不适用highway=motorway标签。
bxl-forever (2023-05-30 22:43:40+00:00): Hello,

I saw you wanted a review.

Thanks for caring about the map.  Sadly, we had to undo your change.

First, because other mappers already had implemented the change.  We surveyed it recently and spotted the signs along the roundabout, confirming that the road itself was named after Mounia Ouyahia.  It is not necessary to add a name to the small green space in the middle.

Also, street names in Brussels always have to be written in both official languages: French and Dutch.

--
(Original version in English.  French translation provided by deepl.com)

Bonjour,

J'ai vu que vous vouliez une évaluation.

Merci de vous soucier de la carte.  Malheureusement, nous avons dû annuler votre changement.

Tout d'abord, parce que d'autres cartographes avaient déjà effectué le changement.  Nous l'avons arpentée récemment et avons repéré les panneaux le long du rond-point, confirmant que la route elle-même portait le nom de Mounia Ouyahia.  Il n'est pas nécessaire d'ajouter un nom au petit espace vert situé au milieu.

Par ailleurs, les noms de rue à Bruxelles doivent toujours être écrits dans les deux langues officielles : le français et le néerlandais.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-30 16:10:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2607299922
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307652313

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jordi MF (2023-05-30 16:57:13+00:00): Hola MikelCalo,
Podries explicar per què mapeges els contactes de carrers amb una corba inicial o final? Per exemple, en estos casos:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23700920
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144387775
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23700909

Considere que no és correcte mapejar una corba si no existeix. El contacte entre els carrers és perpendicular.
Salutacions,
Jordi
MikelCalo (2023-05-30 22:53:29+00:00): Tens raó! Gràcies pel comentari, ho tindré en compte per futures edicions
Filip009 (2023-06-01 15:50:55+00:00): Hello, why you have moved a river here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10940252708 where it was precisely mapped based on ÚGKK SR DMR 5.0 and now it needs to be mapped again. Please revert it to previus position. Move just with path, which was not mapped correctly please.
mgpx (2023-06-01 16:03:38+00:00): In the previous version, the path was crossing the river, but actually it doesn't cross it (surveyed). In the corrected version, the path goes along the river, as in the reality. The modifications were made using my new and previously uploaded tracklogs, the GPS receivers are not super accurate inside the valley, that may result in some errors. What was the accuracy of the river in the original version ?
Filip009 (2023-06-01 16:22:57+00:00): Yes I remember, that I have mapped just river and left path across river, which was not good.
But river was mapped based on https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Maps/Slovakia#DMR5:hillshadeBWSR. This imagery is most accurate to map rivers and streams in Slovakia. Please move river back to riverbed.
mgpx (2023-06-01 16:43:15+00:00): Thanks, if I can load the imagery under JOSM, the geometries will be fixed
Filip009 (2023-06-01 16:55:55+00:00): It should to appear automatically in Imagery tab. Both DMR5: hillshade BW SR and Ortofotomozaika SR 2020-2022 after downloading some area in Slovakia.
mgpx (2023-06-01 17:06:59+00:00): Perfect, thanks, now I see them in JOSM
eggie (2023-05-30 16:52:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Je hebt een aantal Kadaster adresnodes samengevoegd. Zoekacties naar adressen werkt dan niet meer naar behoren.
Zie je edits.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136754377
Het lijkt me beter deze actie terug te draaien. 
Ovrigens kun je wel met de adresnodes schuiven en bv als groepje bij de ingang plaatsen... maar niet combineren svp.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
trigpoint (2023-05-31 13:17:26+00:00): Bore da
What is the source of this edit?

Prohibiting motor vehicles on an unclassified highway seems unlikely. How do farmers access their land?

The road looks like it is well surfaced, which again makes a prohibition on motor vehicles seem unlikely.

Diolch Phil
trigpoint (2023-06-09 15:12:31+00:00): No response so have reverted this edit
eggie (2023-05-30 17:06:12+00:00): Je hebt adresnode 86  verplaatst naar de andere kant van het het gebouw. Maar hier zitten alleen lage nummers.
Weet je zeker dat dit adres niet op de goed plaats stond.
Verder heb je paden verwijderd. Die doorgangen bestaan niet meer?
De landuse=retail heb ik losgemaakt van je paden. Ook loopt een aantal paden door het gebouw zelf zonder tag covered=yes

warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway 	11

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=136754594

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-05-30 17:08:19+00:00): Adresnode 86 teruggezet.
Laat even weten dat het zeker is dat dat adres ergens anders hoort. 
MVG
eggie
Mosshollow (2023-05-30 17:32:26+00:00): De paden waren niet geheel correct mapped. Het gaat hier inderdaad om overdekte paden in een winkelcentrum. Voor mijn correctie waren de paden incompleet.  Momenteel word er ook verbouwd dus binnenkort zullen de paden nog verder verplaatsen.
Het was niet mijn bedoelling om adresnode 86 te verplaatsen dus die kon inderdaad terug.
eggie (2023-05-30 17:37:48+00:00): Oke...  Dan komt het  door editor iD... Op het moment dat je iets selecteert met de linker muisknop en je gaat schuiven met de die zelfde knop trek je van alles mee. Schuiven met iD is tricky.
Met de beter editor JOSM schuif je de kaart met de rechtermuisknop en kan da niet gebeuren.
Een aanrader dus.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/editor-josm-stap-voor-stap/75047 

Plakken van die adresnodes aan elkaar kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens schuiven en intekenen. 
 Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie
silversurfer83 (2023-05-31 08:28:41+00:00): Hi :)

schön, dass du weiter an der Karte arbeitest. Sieht mittlerweile ganz gut aus, was du tust.

Einen Hinweis hätte ich an dieser Stelle:
Wenn du Objekte, die in der Realität nahezu rechtwinklig sind, einträgst, dann drück doch nach dem Zeichnen noch die Taste "Q" um alle Winkel sauber auf 90° zu stellen. Sieht dann auch gleich viel besser aus.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136754722
osmviborg (2023-05-31 05:38:09+00:00): Undlad venligst at tegne cykelstier hvor stierne i forvejen er tagget på hovedvejen.
GZod01 (2023-05-30 16:43:10+00:00): Yes
lefuturiste (2023-05-30 16:50:46+00:00): Super !
Glassman (2023-05-31 21:23:42+00:00): Legally there are no living_streets in the US. I changed it to highway=unclassified. 

Also unless the road is posted with no trespassing or has a closed gate, it shouldn't be marked as private.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136754990
Filip009 (2023-06-01 15:58:55+00:00): Hello, if you are mapping forest roads in Slovakia, please use https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Maps/Slovakia#DMR5:hillshadeBWSR . Many roads are mapped based on this imagery, which is more accurate then basic gpx record. So please move tracks, back to their previous positions, because they were mapped well.
mgpx (2023-06-01 16:29:30+00:00): Thanks for the link. If I have access to the DMR imagery and can load into JOSM, then I'll recheck and fix geometries whenever needed.

One point to note. In many cases, there are 3-4 parallel tracks in OSM, only few meters from each other, while there is only one active one in reality. All the rest are abandoned and sometimes overgrown. Earlier, I didn't understand why those abandoned trails were mapped at all... Now, looking into DMR, becomes apparent that hard to distinguish the real existing tracks from longly abandoned overgrown ones... So, LiDAR imageries are not perfect: while the geometry is super accurate, the actual trail state (active or abandoned) cannot be accurately judged from that
Filip009 (2023-06-01 16:39:25+00:00): Yes, we are trying to figure out this with DMP (digital surface model), but it's a bit harder.
These which are not passable after survey we are keeping in OSM, that they will be not mapped again by other user. But it's not possible to survey each road.
mgpx (2023-06-01 16:50:48+00:00): Ok, I understand, there are similar problems in other regions too when mapping based on imageries. I usually add "abandoned:" prefix to those tracks which are visible on the imagery but no longer exist on the ground. Then probably the best if I follow the same practice here rather than simply deleting the road.
Filip009 (2023-06-01 16:57:43+00:00): Yes, I like your approach of this :)
Glassman (2023-05-31 21:27:08+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Please follow the roof outline and square the building.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136755218