piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2025-12-19 19:58:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "ЦУМ Київ універмаг"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-19 20:07:13+00:00): In this case, it seems the reported issue is false positive. 

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map update!

Best Regards,
Pascal
justinsenemy (2025-12-19 18:23:25+00:00): This area is constantly changing due to ongoing construction. If updating this area, an in-person survey is needed until new aerials are released.
NeisBot (2025-12-19 18:36:10+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (2 changesets) shows that 418 of your last 454 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23630241
user_23630241 (2025-12-19 18:48:28+00:00): Hello, I deleted them intentionally. There were too many buildings on the map that didn't actually exist.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-12-21 11:59:18+00:00): Same here, Henri-Bourassa should be a tunnel at layer -1 and the railway tracks at layer 0
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-12-21 12:05:25+00:00): I see the wiki explains that cuttings should not count as layer -1, so you are right. Seems weird that layers do not follow the terrain though. Forget what I said in the two other changesets too. Thanks!
NeisBot (2025-12-19 19:58:56+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/9953660538 v7

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Optometry services in Yorkville IL"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 06:32:19+00:00): 🔄 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description by https://osm.org/changeset/176611993
kartler175 (2025-12-20 12:16:34+00:00): Please check https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-116.30614&lat=49.10096&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways and fix issues before further editing.
InsertUser (2026-01-17 17:52:29+00:00): If you have the current information for this shop then feel free to update the data to be correct.
szalona_entropia (2025-12-20 20:08:56+00:00): Jest to normalnie droga krajowa 44, konkretnie DK44c, kilometraż do 1+400. Niczym się nie różni od dalszej części obwodnicy.
https://drogi.gddkia.gov.pl/mapy/mapa-informacji-drogowej
b-jazz (2025-12-21 18:17:38+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459699998

FYI, I fixed up the 12th green. If there is no fringe around the green, the fairway shouldn't surround the green, but should instead butt up next to it and share the nodes at the border of the green and fairway.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-18 04:06:24+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised editing from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177359241
rskedgell (2025-12-20 00:10:23+00:00): Please don't delete features which clearly exist. This track is clearly visible in Bing's aerial imagery and OS Open Maps Local (October 2025). It is also recorded in the OS Open Roads dataset.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176160760

Re-tagged as a track with private access for all transport modes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176160859

As the main part of Lawday Place Lane is already tagged with access=destination (presumably an un-gated, privately owned unadopted highway), this track would not in any case have been reachable by OSM-based routing software except as a destination.

Please take a look at the following wiki articles:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
HellMap (2025-12-20 20:36:30+00:00): Kā iepriekš par šo vietu jautāju - vai šeit ir kādas jaunas zīmes vai izmaiņas? `highway=living_street` nozīmē dzīvojamo zonu un to lieto tikai ceļiem, kas apzīmēti ar attiecīgo zilo 533. ceļa zīmi, jo tur attiecas īpaši noteikumi navigācijai. Gadu atpakaļ šeit zīmju vēl nebija.
Asais (2025-12-20 20:43:46+00:00): Tas ka nav zīme, nenozīmē ka nav dzivojamā zona. Jebkurs ceļs dzivojamā masīvā iekšā būs Dzivojamā zona.
HellMap (2025-12-20 21:08:28+00:00): "Dzīvojamā zona" ir tikai ar 533. zīmi apzīmēta teritorija:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Maz%C4%81ki_ce%C4%BCi

https://likumi.lv/ta/id/274865-celu-satiksmes-noteikumi 2.11

Tas, ko tu mini, CSN izpratnē ir "daudzdzīvokļu namu pagalms" un nav pats par sevi dzīvojamā zona, kaut arī tur ir gandrīz tie paši noteikumi. Jāņem vērā, ka OSM ir pasaules karte un "dzīvojamā zona" ir klasifikācija, kas sastopama daudzās valstīs, bet sakrītoši noteikumi tieši pagalmu ielām ir specifisks gadījums tieši Latvijai.

Diemžēl pašlaik nav formāli apstiprināts, kā Latvijā kartēt pagalmu ceļus izņemot kā `highway=service`. Es piekrītu, ka tā ir nepilnība datos. Iespējams, ka ļoti derētu kaut kāds `service=courtyard` uz tiem ceļiem vai kā tā, bet tas nav vēl pašlaik bijis apspriests un apstiprināts kopienā. (Šādu vai līdzīgu vērtību gan var lietot (un vēlāk nomainīt) arī tagad.)
Asais (2025-12-20 21:21:00+00:00): Šīs ceļa zīmes pie daudzdzīvokļu māju pagalmiem vēl ilgi nesaliks, kaut gan pēc likuma tām tur vajadzētu būt. Tāpēc formāli tās ir Dzivojamās zonas.
HellMap (2025-12-20 22:28:59+00:00): Nevienā likumā nav šādi teikts. Un pat, ja būtu, OSM kartē tikai to, kas faktiski eksistē nevis to, kam būtu jābūt. Es augstāk jau ieliku linku, kur CSN ir norādīts, kas ir un kas nav dzīvojamā zona. Un arī ieliku linkus gan vispārīgi gan konkrēti Latvijai, kur OSM skaidri nodala, kādus ceļus atzīmē kā dzīvojamo ielu. Ja nav dzīvojamās zonas zīmes, tad `highway=living_street` Latvijā neliek.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-18 20:47:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177391275 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious changes in Somali, Ethiopia and the USA
SomeoneElse (2025-12-29 22:55:30+00:00): Hello,
You are arguing about whether https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/15921137 should be secondary or tertiary.  Please explain why you think it should be secondary (or tertiary), and (importantly) why you think that your view has the backing of the community in Poland.  Please link to the relevant section of the Polish forum or wiki to support your case.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2025-12-29 22:55:51+00:00): Witaj,
Spierasz się o to, czy https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/15921137 powinien być mapą drugorzędną, czy trzeciorzędną. Wyjaśnij, dlaczego uważasz, że powinien być mapą drugorzędną (lub trzeciorzędną) i (co ważne), dlaczego uważasz, że Twój pogląd cieszy się poparciem społeczności w Polsce. Podaj link do odpowiedniej sekcji polskiego forum lub wiki, aby uzasadnić swoje stanowisko.
Z poważaniem,
Andy Townsend, w imieniu Grupy Roboczej ds. Danych OSM
Gregory UKR (2025-12-21 13:29:58+00:00): Проїз на парковці, тим паче на парковці з позначеними дорожньою розміткою місцями для парковки, варто позначати service=parking_aisle на додаток до highway=service
t_ja (2025-12-19 19:52:42+00:00): Ahoj,
preco si zrusil access=no, ked tato vetva nebude otvorena? Zbytocne to bude klamat navigacie...

T.
mapko (2025-12-19 20:08:49+00:00): Ahoj, doplnil som este access=private. Toto by malo postacovat.
NeisBot (2025-12-19 19:36:21+00:00): Hi R0bbert, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 82% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 7 landuse(s)
- 1 power(s)
- 8 source(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176154358
R0bbert (2025-12-19 20:10:56+00:00): Hi Neisbot,

Yes it looks correct.
For the powerpoll i created a new node, and later found the node that was in the incorrect spot. So it's a create and delete of the same thin.

I combined all the little forrest 3DShapes into one big shape over the whole chaletpark. That gave the most deletions of all the nodes.

I thinks its more correct this way (not perfect yet).
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-20 09:34:44+00:00): 👍 Thank you
Langlaeufer (2026-02-05 10:51:16+00:00): Hallo,

mir fallen gelegentlich Übergänge (Knoten) auf die nicht genau auf der Kreuzung Gewehweg/Straße erfasst sind. Ich habe das in folgendem Changeset korrigiert:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=178133803

Grüße Langläufer
Fraxi (2025-12-20 21:21:22+00:00): Здравейте!
Можете да коригирате годината от датата на проверка(check_date). Също така, препоръчително е когато съборените сгради съществуват на по-стари сателитни снимки, да се отбелязват с https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished:building ,вместо да се изтриват директно. Както и да се добави представка https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:was:* за обекти, които е възможно да бъдат добавени(ако присъстват на сателитни снимки или в някакви отворени данни). Със съответната стойност.
kadiwa (2025-12-23 16:45:01+00:00): Hallo nacador,
woher nimmst du die Information, dass die Straße Lattenkampstieg heißt? Generell sollte man am besten an jedem Changeset eine Quelle angeben, wenn man neue Informationen einträgt (vor allem aus Lizenzgründen). Vor Ort steht auf jeden Fall "Lattenkamp" dran.

Foto: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ljlfep4eg6saxcr4pnlp3/IMG_4534.jpg?rlkey=jikxghx3yo7il7kbk9qr7ojbh
Auch der Friseur und das Restaurant hier geben in ihrer Adresse "Lattenkamp" an: https://elbschoen.de/#salon https://www.ginya-hamburg.de/
rskedgell (2025-12-19 23:48:25+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

As OSM is an international project, phone numbers stored as phone=* or contact:phone=* use the international format.

This isn't your fault, as the editor you used really should have flagged it. I've restored it for you.
larveyhong (2025-12-20 00:32:44+00:00): Thank you for this, I’ll keep this in mind for future!
rskedgell (2025-12-20 00:47:23+00:00): No problem. Thanks for helping to keep the map up to date - and for making me aware of a brewery I need to "research" next time I'm near Dorking.
flohoff (2025-12-19 21:52:36+00:00): Nur so als hint weil ich den changeset gerade gsehen habe.

Wenn da ein access=yes drauf ist gilt das - damit sind alle anderen hinfällig. 

Und in den verschiedenen tags gibts eine hierarchie - ist im Wiki beschrieben:

motor_vehicle inkludiert motorcar und motorcycle - d.h. das ist alles total überflüssig das auch zu  taggen.

Wenn da ein Zeichen 260 steht + Landwirtschaft frei ist das einzige access tag was drauf muss ein "motor_vehicle=agricultural" - denn Z260 ist immer motor_vehicle - und NUR motor_vehicle 

Flo
user_10799485 (2025-12-20 05:42:47+00:00): Ich habe nur Kraftfahrzeuge auf Agricultural gelassen. Vorher war alle, Fußgänger, Kraftfahrzeuge, Fahrradfahrer und Reiter Reiter auf agricultural. Denn Fußgänger; Fahrradfahrer und Reiter dürfen ja da lang. Leider stehen keine brauchbaren Mapillary-Bilder zur Verfügung und die eigentlich verbotene Quelle ist da auch nicht lang gefahren. Und Du hast mir meine Frage immer noch nicht beantwortet. Die sich hier gleich erneut stellt. Woher hast Du jetzt schon wieder gesehen das ich hier etwas gemacht habe? Ich sehe nämlich nicht wenn irgendjemand irgendwo etwas gemacht hat. Selbst auf meine eigenen zurückliegenden Änderungen kann ich hier nicht wie bei Wikipedia direkt zurückgreifen.
MfG: Der Wilderer
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-22 13:23:42+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13389469602
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137316991

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Gregory Peony (2025-12-20 17:32:36+00:00): Hi, all footprints you mapped here represent buildings, thanks for moving the one to also align with imagery.

Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176155492
eggie (2025-12-19 20:53:19+00:00): Hi,

No need to add bicycle=no and horse=no on a footway. That's default.
Please decrease your edit area. 
Please comment your uploads in English or Dutch.
No hiking path anymore at the Krekelspad?
Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176155525

Greetz,
eggie
Timinator2911 (2025-12-19 23:04:33+00:00): I was there with my bike a few days ago. It looked like there was a path a few years ago. But now there is just forest.
eggie (2025-12-20 07:13:44+00:00): Hi...

Clear... thx for response.

Greetz..
eggie
Senihtu (2025-12-20 04:45:18+00:00): Guten Morgen!
In diesem changeset hast Du way 212051163 wieder mit service=driveway getaggt.
Wir sollten das nicht immer hin und her ändern sondern uns einigen.
s=d ist meiner Auffassung nach eine reine Grundtückszufahrt (so lese ich das wiki). 
Das kann nicht zutreffen, wenn da ein Linienbus fährt.
Warum meinst Du, daß das da hingehört?
Gruß Senihtu
GlobalScan (2025-12-20 12:19:31+00:00): Здравствуйте. Скажите, пожалуйста, почему удаляете теги "addr:street" у домов с неизвестной нумерацией?
А границы деревни есть где-то на Публичной кадастровой карте?
Grass-snake (2025-12-20 14:09:39+00:00): Здравствуйте, недавно видел тоже улицу без указания дома, которая висела более 8 лет, не люблю предупреждения валидатора, по настроению снёс. :)

По поводу границ я спрашивал в чате Телеграм 16 августа, получил ответ https://t.me/ruosm/922800 . А уж забрать оттуда данные не составило труда (точно знаю что другие не связанные со мной люди тоже копируют границы, при этом получают точно такие же полигоны, натыкался на таких в Краснодарском крае, хотел уточнить границы, а получил такой же полигон, абсолютно идентичный).
GlobalScan (2025-12-21 06:37:18+00:00): Спасибо за ответы!
grzegorz75jan (2025-12-19 21:09:48+00:00): Do końca życia będziesz tak dziubdział, że co miedza i kretówka to nowy zestaw wysyłasz. Jeszcze się dzień nie skończył a już nawaliłeś 24 edycje po parę maks parę węzłów, linii i wysyłasz to co parę minut czy nawet minutę.

Weź się ogarnij bo to dosłownie spamuje listę edycji z danego obszaru. Już Ci zwracałem na to uwagę.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176156432
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-20 09:19:46+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176160091
tg4567 (2025-12-21 17:55:38+00:00): Hocam şuraya access:no yapmışsın galiba ama arabalar geçiyor oradan: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1458708056
Arlo James Barnes (2026-01-25 06:19:12+00:00): How can both this building and the one at the south end of Grant be #102?
Aeuri (2026-01-25 18:36:05+00:00): Sorry, this one is 240. I will fix it.
Arlo James Barnes (2026-01-27 03:14:53+00:00): Alright, I added the `wikidata` key to each of them.
impiaaa (2025-12-19 23:13:17+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! OSM is a live database of real places used by hundreds of maps with millions of users. Any edits that you make are live and visible to everyone, so please make sure what you add is real before saving your changes!
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-20 09:19:26+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176160091

Thanks, impiaaa
db-ak (2025-12-19 21:20:44+00:00): Teraz strefa czasowa dokładniejsza jest w Świnoujściu?
Yukiro (2025-12-19 22:40:29+00:00): Nie wiem, nie zajmowałem się tym, bbox taki duży bo granice morskie ruszałem
𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙯𝙚𝙧 ദ്ദി ᗜˬᗜ✧ (2025-12-20 09:55:38+00:00): Aj, ale BBOX... Zmiana dobra, tylko zaradzam więcej relacji takich nie ruszać :wink:
Yukiro (2025-12-21 10:06:05+00:00): Będę ruszał jeszcze dużo 😈 (ktoś musi)
Udarian (2025-12-19 23:15:48+00:00): the arcgis link provided has the following error that does not allow others to see the data and check correctness:
"
Unable to add layer GeneralGovernment PA
The layer, GeneralGovernment PA, cannot be added to the map."
amakarevich_lyft (2025-12-22 19:01:55+00:00): Hi Udarian,
My name is Artem, and I'm the OSM Policy Lead at Lyft. Thanks for bringing this up. It looks like something is broken in preview mode. Please try using this link with preview: https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html?panel=gallery&layers=eef6b33da60d47c0964387960c840eea
If that also doesn't work, please refer to the initial page where you can load the map by yourself: https://gis-mdc.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/MDC::address/about

Best regards, 
Artem
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-12-19 22:10:05+00:00): This is "Attempted to fix tags (P2)"
Ionut Paduretu (2025-12-20 08:28:15+00:00): Salutare! Apreciez că te-ai apucat să realiniezi drumurile și să mai adaugi clădiri/anexe de clădiri în zona Hângu, NT - dar te rog nu mai șterge clădirile vechi, deja adăugate. Poți lua legătura cu mine și mă ocup eu să le realiniez/să lucrez la detalii. Mulțumesc!
AndyB_66 (2025-12-20 19:41:02+00:00): Wandalizm nie będzie tolerowany.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176194151
nevw (2025-12-20 23:07:22+00:00): These were tagged natural=wood which I have put back.
The areas you have named are not the proper boundaries of the park and include parts of residents yards. Are you able to map the boundaries of the environmental park correctly and leave the wooded areas separate?
AndyB_66 (2025-12-20 19:39:35+00:00): Wandalizm nie będzie tolerowany.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176194116
NeisBot (2025-12-20 08:00:51+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13389648405 v1

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Clínica de tratamentos faciais e corporais"
---
Por exemplo, uma versão mais neutra e factual da sua descrição poderia ser: "Clínica de tratamentos faciais e corporais"
---
(Auto-translation)

#MapWithoutSpam #Tag #Description
NeisBot (2025-12-30 06:33:37+00:00): ❌ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/176159203
Thanks @ Arlandia
Arlandia (2025-12-30 18:15:37+00:00): Clinica de estética
Robot8A (2025-12-20 15:38:50+00:00): No creo que este cambio sea correcto, ya que corta el acceso peatonal y ciclista, y yo creo que se permite en este caso.
alejandroscf (2025-12-21 01:16:02+00:00): La rotonda no permite el paso peatonal, si no recuedo mal, no hay pasos de peatones ni acera.
En las vías de acceso que si que hay acera en algunos tramos, ¿tal vez trunk_link o indicar las claves access correspondientes?
Robot8A (2026-01-01 12:17:56+00:00): trunk_link tendría sentido
Ziemowit Zabawa (2025-12-21 19:08:59+00:00): Dodałeś 2 razy relację OPP, tj. 19980920 oraz 19980921. Nie patrzyłem dokładnie czym, ale się różnią. Czy to był celowy zabieg?
d3mol3k (2025-12-21 19:41:40+00:00): Cześć - tak to celowy zabieg - tworzymy relację dla obu kierunków - z Leszna w stronę Cybulic i druga w kierunku przeciwnym. 
Pozostały do uzupełnienia tagi ref, description i source po dodaniu danych na mapie GITD Canard. Zauważyłeś też że zdjąłem fotoradary z miejsca kamer a w ich miejsce są wpisane kamery survilance=average_speed. 
i dziękuję za ten komentarz bo widze że w jednej z relacji zdublowały mi się częściowo wpisy w section
Sun2306 (2025-12-21 02:34:45+00:00): I can't really agree with this being on the map, given that it's not even a 'trail' or 'way' (i.e. you cannot reasonably follow it) and was partially decommissioned after the filming of the video, to my knowledge. Not only is it potentially harmful to have it listed (though I know you are not easily swayed by this argument), it does not really exist.
eerib (2025-12-22 01:31:39+00:00): Hello Sungod2306,

The video linked below was recorded approximately one month after the release of the Trolldom film and depicts the trail intact, with only two boards removed. This observation is consistent with photographs taken from across the valley that I have reviewed over the past few months.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nh0a50V7v0

I expect to be in the Squamish Valley next year to survey several trails and hope to have an opportunity to assess the current condition of the trails in this area at that time.

I have added several additional tags to better represent the trail’s difficulty. While the existing tagging is not a perfect fit due to the trail’s unique characteristics, I plan to submit a proposal in the coming months to introduce additional tags that more accurately describe mountain bike trails of this nature.

I do not believe that the inclusion of this trail in the OpenStreetMap database constitutes an unreasonable risk to public safety. The trail’s difficulty is likely to discourage almost all users from attempting to ride it. Furthermore, an individual would need to make a deliberate and informed decision to replace the two removed boards prior to attempting the trail. If you continue to consider the trail to pose a significant public safety concern, I recommend first contacting the trail-building team to request that the trail be fully dismantled. Should they decline to do so, you may then choose to report the matter to the District Recreation Officer for the Sea to Sky Recreation District, who would forward the complaint to Compliance and Enforcement for investigation and removal.

Thank you,
eerib