piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Chopper Rob (2024-08-15 21:22:10+00:00): Ja volgens mij is het voornamelijk lichte gravel en wat stukjes hard aangereden grond. Het is in ieder geval nog prima te doen met de racefiets. Ik zal hem aanpassen naar fine_gravel
eggie (2024-08-15 21:26:03+00:00): 👍
marc__marc (2024-10-31 22:18:07+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12113225811
es-tu sur qu'il y a 2 places par borne ?
par ailleurs tu as renseigné 2 stations au lieu d'une station avec 2 bornes
Cordialement,
Marc
Mevess (2024-11-01 09:01:15+00:00): Pour ce qui est de la station je vais corriger, j'ai en effet confondu borne et station
En ce qui concerne les places c'est un peu spécial. chaque borne peut charger 2 véhicules simultanément, mais il n'y a que 3 places: https://api.panoramax.xyz/#focus=pic&map=17/45.525574/4.871096&pic=bb700e84-2894-4708-aeee-606cff36bda1&speed=250&xyz=318.00/0.00/30
Mevess (2024-11-01 09:10:59+00:00): j'avais utilisé cette version du wiki pour les bornes/stations https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity=charging_station, qui a du être rédigé avant l'apparition de man_made=charge_point
marc__marc (2024-11-01 09:25:24+00:00): Merci pour ton retour, je vais améliorer/mettre à jour le wiki
eggie (2024-08-16 07:46:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
BikePC (2024-08-16 19:20:24+00:00): Waarom hier een access=yes tag nodig? M.i. overbodig.
jb54osm (2024-08-21 21:56:47+00:00): StreetComplete voegt die tag "access=yes" toe als iedereen 'naar binnen' mag. Ook als je in iD toegang op "Openbaar" zet verschijnt deze tag.
BikePC (2024-08-22 07:46:49+00:00): Ik heb de access=yes er toch maar weer afgehaald. StreetComplete zit hier m.i. toch compleet fout - dan zou je die tag access=yes op alle openbare plaatsen te zien krijgen...
Commute0013 (2024-08-15 20:04:11+00:00): Ik weet niet of dit de beste oplossing is, maar op gebied van navigatie lijkt dit mij logischer? Maar misschien weer een valkuil
eggie (2024-08-15 20:19:49+00:00): Hoi  Het ziet er logisch uit. :)
Groet
eggie
Zrop (2024-08-15 20:32:52+00:00): Hallo eköln,
Geschäftsnamen bitte so Eintragen wie sie auch vor Ort ausgeschildert sind.

Zrop
unzow (2024-08-17 07:20:23+00:00): fixed.
Carto'Cité (2024-11-11 13:29:24+00:00): Bonjour Bernard,
Peux-tu me confirmer qu'il y a bien une nouvelle piste cyclable qui a été construite le long
Car ici on voit qu'une bande cyclable avait été décrite (il faudrait donc l'enlever si c'est bien le cas). 
Je n'ai rien trouvé au sujet de cette piste sauf ici mais ça date un peu : https://dtp2i.fr/dtp2i-news-20/
Si tu passes dans le secteur tu as peut-être la possibilité de prendre des photos pour les ajouter à Panoramax, c'est un super moyen de contribuer et documenter les contributions.
Si la piste est bien une nouvelle piste, je pense que la traversée doit être reprise car les crossings ne sont pas précisés (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/49.1000012/2.2743121&layers=Y) ; je pense que tu as davantage décrit la trajectoire que l'aménagement mais je peux me tromper sans informations. Il faut au moins séparer la partie traversée de la vraie piste.
Je suis à ta disposition si tu veux en discuter.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Carto'Cité (2024-11-11 13:34:57+00:00): J'ai ajouté cycleway=crossing sur cette portion pour info : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1308020676
J'imagine que si tu as des informations aussi précises c'est que tu passes par là. Et aussi tu parles de l'utilisation de trace GPX. Tu parles d'ailleurs également de « data file » et je me demande de quoi il s'agit ; tu as eu accès à des données des aménagements ?
Merci d'avance pour ton aide :)
Charles
eggie (2024-08-15 20:24:00+00:00): Maar nu routeert het niet meer. Hoe gaat het verkeer vanuit het noorden de Zeislaan op naar links?
eggie (2024-08-15 20:27:31+00:00): Dit waren je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=155300513
Commute0013 (2024-08-15 20:35:28+00:00): Heb het weer terug gezet. Nu klopt de navigatie weer.

Ik ben het nog een beetje aan het leren en zeker met de addertjes. Some is het wel oke en soms niet. Fijn om te horen dat mijn initiele gedachten klopten
Commute0013 (2024-08-15 20:36:30+00:00): Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155300887
eggie (2024-08-15 20:42:07+00:00): Yep.. Nu klopt het weer.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-15 20:31:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"osiedle Grzebaki Górne":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12113250571

"Spacerowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12113263509

"Osiedle Korcza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12113263575

"Pogoni Lwów":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12113263701

"Kantora":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12113263728

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
trigpoint (2026-03-11 15:13:54+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/179707075
trigpoint (2026-03-11 15:13:50+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/179707075
tkk (2024-08-16 05:36:12+00:00): Ahoj, v rámci této sady změn jsi odstranil tagy z naučné cedule "U buku". Má to znamenat, že jsi byl na místě a cedule tam není, nebo je to chyba, či to má jiný důvod? Děkuji.
dvdkon (2024-08-16 07:11:58+00:00): Ahoj, byl jsem tam a ceduli jsem na rozcestí našel jen jednu, tu s mapou.

Nevěděl jsem, že StreetComplete zbaví bod všech tagů a nesmaže ho (kvůli relaci?). Asi by měl být odstraněn úplně.
tkk (2024-08-16 07:22:18+00:00): Ano, zrejme je to kvuli relaci. Uklidim to. Diky.
eggie (2024-08-16 07:47:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
molensteen (2024-08-17 15:24:44+00:00): Dankjewel Eggie
PaoloLombardi (2025-06-24 14:45:59+00:00): Prato Nevoso - "Baita del Rosso"
Sinceramente non capisco perché modifichi quello che avevo già correttamente mappato come un prato verde e non "area in costruzione".
Prima di modificare ti suggerisco caldamemte di sincerarti attraverso immagini aggiornate, come quelle che puoi torvare sulla webcam di Prato Nevoso, e non "obsolete" come quelle qui in uso su OSM.
Grazie.
Zrop (2024-08-15 21:12:53+00:00): Hallo eköln.
Du hast hier wohl aus Versehen den Eingang https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12113284172 auf die U-Bahn Strecke gesetzt. Schau Dir das bitte nochmal an.

Zrop
unzow (2024-08-17 07:20:16+00:00): fixed.
rskedgell (2024-08-16 06:25:15+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding these trees.

In general, the name tag is only used for trees with their own name, e.g. Major Oak in Sherwood Forest ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/455984558 )

To add the type of tree, you can use tags like species:en (for the common English name) and species (if known). If you would like any help with this, please let me know.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species:en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species
PhotoDM (2024-08-16 11:33:44+00:00): Many thanks for the advice - I will correct those already labelled and carry on with the rest.
Much obliged to you.
Zrop (2024-08-15 22:01:28+00:00): Hallo eköln,
wir erfassen in OSM keine ehemaligen Objekte. Die Kaufhofzentrale ist hier schon seid Jahren raus. Bitte wieder entfernen.

Zrop
unzow (2024-08-29 19:06:19+00:00): already removed
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-15 21:20:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12113312819
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1027114214

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2024-08-15 21:20:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12113308074

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Katrin_H (2024-08-23 09:09:03+00:00): Hi Thore,
für mich sieht dieser Weg hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1308032634/history) sehr segregated aus: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=888268419815531&lat=53.138245102068&lng=10.487516205767974&z=1.5. Was meinst du?
thorescharnweber (2024-08-23 10:14:16+00:00): ja stimmt, das habe ich übersehen
scai (2025-01-14 07:47:32+00:00): Hi Kendrak,

du hattest hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/24555665) drei Abbiegebeschränkungen angelegt. Kann es sein, dass manche oder gar alle drei nicht mehr aktuell sind? Ich bin hier nur flüchtig vorbei gekommen, aber aber keine der beiden only left/right turn gesehen. Hier darf man meiner Meinung nach problemlos von Ost nach West und auch umgekehrt fahren. Die no_entry-Beschränkung scheint mir redundant zu sein und kann demnach vermutlich auch weg.

Siehe dazu auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4587716

Vielleicht hast du ja demnächst mal die Gelegenheit das vor Ort zu prüfen. Danke.

Grüße
Alex
Kendrak (2025-01-14 16:08:40+00:00): Hallo Alex,

die Änderungen bestanden zeitweise während des Verkehrsversuchs, siehe https://www.dresden.de/de/stadtraum/zentrale-projekte/kesselsdorfer-strasse/verkehrsversuch-kesselsdorfer.php

Dort bestanden sie aber streng auch für Fahrradfahrer, eine Ausnahme "Fahrräder frei" war nicht ausgeschildert. Ignoriert wurde es von allen Verkehrsteilnehmern.

Der Verkehrsversuch ist beendet, aber die Umsetzung ist beschlossen. Momentan ist die Durchfahrt möglich, das Abbiegen auch.

Gruß, Kendrak
scai (2025-01-15 07:31:59+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Antwort. Habe die Abbiegebeschränkungen entfernt. Wenn der Verkehrsversuch endgültig umgesetzt wird, reicht es vielleicht, einfach diesen Änderungsssatz rückgängig zu machen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161369486
Colin Smale (2024-08-16 10:00:59+00:00): Hi! I see that this boundary change doesn't take administrative effect until April 2025 so I think your changeset is somewhat premature. I propose to revert the Eastfield boundary to its current line, and update it again in April 2025, when the updated boundary will have its new GSS code. https://edemocracy.northyorks.gov.uk/documents/s33564/Final%20Recommendations%20on%20the%20CGRs%20for%20Harrogate%20and%20Scarborough.pdf
Langlaeufer (2024-08-16 14:59:54+00:00): Ein Radweg mit Fußgänger frei ist eher untypisch?
Ist der weg als Rad/Fußweg beschildert?
Oder ist es einfach ein Mehrzweckweg ohne nähere Beschilderung (path). Wie ist es für Kfz gesperrt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155303235
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-18 23:12:08+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155437416
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-05 13:23:10+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12113430015/history has shop = barber that was added in this edit
shop=barber ? Maybe following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:hairdresser%3Dbarber would be a good idea and shop=hairdresser hairdresser=barber would be a better tagging?
NeisBot (2024-08-15 22:40:38+00:00): Hi Chappy-2, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 100% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 3 highway(s)

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=155303920
pitscheplatsch (2024-08-16 06:18:46+00:00): Should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks!
Buraddo (2024-08-16 19:08:58+00:00): Why did you extend this road? The main road has bollards as physical separation. The turn is impossible to make
BlueButterfly (2024-08-20 17:48:38+00:00): Hello Buraddo,
I extended this residential highway because I did not see any physical barrier preventing this connection in aerial imagery nor in 2022 Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.797244199998&lng=21.242724899998&z=17.17696947638558&pKey=5054572701299193&focus=photo). A bollard is not present in the resources I have available to me but since you have knowledge that says otherwise, I’m happy to defer to your edits.
I hope you have a wonderful day!
silversurfer83 (2024-08-16 07:31:04+00:00): Moin

was ist eigentlich aus den Quellen deiner Fernwärme geworden?

https://osm.org/changeset/151288167

cheers
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155303970
SG86 (2024-08-16 10:30:31+00:00): Hallo silversurfer, 
ich habe keine Antwort erhalten und daher auch nicht weitergemacht. 
Bei der gestrigen Bearbeitung habe ich nur bereits in OSM vorhandene Leitungen aktualisiert. Es kamen keine neuen Leitungen hinzu. Diese Leitungen sind auch alle vor Ort sichtbar.
Viele Grüße
silversurfer83 (2024-08-16 10:48:23+00:00): OK

Was sichtbar ist kannst du sehr gerne erfassen. Nur bitte nicht von fremden Plänen abzeichnen

Alles Gute 
Silversurfer
SG86 (2024-08-16 11:53:55+00:00): Hallo, 
ich habe die Regeln verstanden. 
Unterirdische Leitungen mache ich nur rein wenn Hinweisschilder vorhanden sind oder ich den Bau aus Zeitung und Co mitbekommen und mir vor Ort den Verlauf anschaue.
Viele Grüße
Ökkel (2024-08-15 22:45:57+00:00): Korrektur: Quelle ist osm.org/note/3962390
LockOnGuy (2024-08-16 00:47:56+00:00): Stop changing the classification of this abandoned village!
Buraddo (2024-08-16 19:09:24+00:00): Why did you extend this road? The main road has bollards as physical separation. The turn is impossible to make
BlueButterfly (2024-08-20 17:42:19+00:00): Hello Buraddo,
I extended this residential highway because we can see the left turn arrow sign printed on the street in 2022 Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.78625069793401&lng=21.236913100002994&z=17&focus=photo&dateFrom=2022-01-01&pKey=2623104394500879) and I did not see any physical barrier preventing this connection in aerial imagery nor in 2022 Mapillary. A bollard is not present in the resources I have available to me but since you have knowledge that says otherwise, I’m happy to defer to your edits. I hope you have a wonderful day!
Kovoschiz (2024-08-16 06:44:16+00:00): Please observe that `=bus_station` in HK doesn't include "Bus Terminus" etc generic forms in the `name=` , so this should have `name=SKYCITY`
Kovoschiz (2024-08-16 06:49:04+00:00): `short_name=` should be used to further remove the generic form of the proper name, eg `name:en=Mun Tung Estate` can be `short_name:en=Mun Tung`
0235 (2025-02-08 23:00:59+00:00): Good update, nice use of the "disused" tag! I can see you take good care of this Airport.
nickvet419 (2025-02-08 23:25:53+00:00): thanks,  i also do Ohare. its a bit more complicated to keep up to date with project O’Hare 21 going on with constant updates. Luckily both airports have aoa-alert pages that have detailed info on whet is being updated.
julcnx (2024-08-18 10:39:24+00:00): reverted due to conflicting classification changes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155407705
mcliquid (2024-08-17 11:33:00+00:00): Please don't take this as criticism, but if you at least distribute the changes across countries, it makes it much easier to check the changes.

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
Yotsen (2024-08-17 21:38:55+00:00): Yes, I know about this rule. Some stuff happened while I was doing maproulette using josm. All the tasks end up on the same layer, so I selected some stuff I didn't want to when using the search function and didn't realize until the validator caught it. So I had to go into that area and fix what I messed up. Hopefully now that this happened once I'll avoid doing it again.
Yotsen (2024-08-17 21:41:00+00:00): Ah, it seems this would be the tool I should have used https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/Purge
-io- (2024-09-18 14:58:17+00:00): А возвращать движение планируется? :)
tyfi (2024-08-16 01:08:57+00:00): There was a road segment previously mapped as a secondary_link road which is actually a proper designated route segment (MO 49). If you're just looking at designations, then the intersection looks like a Y. The road segment that closes the triangle is actually an undesignated connector segment inline with MO 49 to the south and MO 21/72 to the north.
tyfi (2024-08-16 01:09:50+00:00): I also added stop signs, a yield sign, and smoothed out the ways.
rskedgell (2026-05-11 19:30:19+00:00): I'm pretty sure this is lgbtq=primary - several of the pages of the menu are effectively a Polari -> Deutsch phrasebook.
Lumikeiju (2026-05-11 19:56:04+00:00): Thank you for your comment and edit - happy mapping!
tyfi (2024-08-16 02:23:37+00:00): I also smoothed out ways, adjusted lane counts, and added some smaller roads like driveways and service roads.
felipeeugenio (2024-08-16 14:30:31+00:00): Hola César, como te hemos comentado anteriormente, el que una calle sea muy transitada no amerita un cambio de clasificación. Por lo demás las calles que cambias no tienen preferencia de paso en basicamente ninguna esquina, por lo que no corresponde elevarla. Otra cosa muy distinta es que dicha calle esté congestionada o sirva a algún mapero en particular para sus ruteos diarios.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155306950
tyfi (2024-08-16 02:44:57+00:00): I also added lane counts, turn restrictions, and service roads; and I smoothed some ways out.
tastrax (2024-08-16 06:42:18+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers 
To get the + symbol on a mobile device numeric keypad you may need to do a LONG press on the zero.
I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
jleedev (2024-09-16 14:24:11+00:00): https://www.observer-reporter.com/shl/2019/mar/03/immigrants-once-flocked-to-the-five-towns-of-thoms-run/ “Built in 1900, the Presto Hotel, which sits along Thoms Run Road in Presto, is still a working tavern today.”
tyfi (2024-08-16 03:27:26+00:00): Each route connects to both directions of US 65, so there is a slight overlap in the middle.
habi (2024-08-16 07:08:09+00:00): Thanks for fixing my error.

(I'm subscribed to my Osmose errors via RSS, you've fixed it before the notifiction arrived :) )
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-08-22 05:46:36+00:00): Hi anh, anh check ảnh Mapillary giúp là xe hơi vẫn vào đi ngõ này nhé để giáng cấp xuống highway = service, service = alley cho đúng thực địa chứ ko nên để motorcar = no luôn.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-08-22 05:53:14+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=20.992966796875&lng=105.83697480625&z=17&pKey=961285411840906&focus=photo&x=0.6749903437150745&y=0.4546740204087763&zoom=0.4993192031500937
delroth (2024-09-05 15:42:33+00:00): Hi rrraphaaa,

I was looking recently at crosswalks in Zürich marked as having audible signals, since I suspect many people are inadvertently mistagging the yellow vibrating boxes. I noticed this changeset as well as a few others of yours through https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1QGI

I was wondering whether you remember / could double check whether the signals you edited here are "special" and in fact have audio, or whether they're just the standard vibrating boxes?

Other ones I've noticed that you tagged recently:

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155309584
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155199785

Thank you!
rrraphaaa (2024-09-05 17:34:16+00:00): Hi delroth,

Indeed, all these traffic signals have no sound, vibration only.

Thanks for noticing!
bxl-forever (2024-08-16 08:24:55+00:00): Hello,

Please observe that in the Brussels-Capital Region, the "name" tag must match the concatenation of name:fr and name:nl.

You added name:fr and name:nl tags that are longer versions of the name tag.

For the record, this area had been intensively discussed in recent months after this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4076361 and I am a bit worried that in past changesets you seem to have redrawn the outline of this area despite we had carefully reviewed it.  Also, in the linked documents from the note, there is no trace of the long name you added.

Could you please double check that name:fr and name:nl really exist?  Thanks.
Tom Ameye (2024-08-16 10:41:37+00:00): Hi bxl-forever, I did not modify the outline of what is drawn as nature reserve, because I have no reference for that.
The names I have added are the ones that are on the local panel and this panel is issued by official instances such as Leefmilieu Brussel and the Brussels-Capital Region.
These are also the names used by the CCN/CBN.
Let me know if anything still unclear.
Best regards,
Tom
Tom Ameye (2024-08-16 11:22:11+00:00): Additional question: what is you reference for the boundaries of the réserve naturelle? I notice that in waarnemingen.be, the area drawn is larger than what is currently mapped.
Best regards,
Tom
RaphaelPasloin (2024-08-18 02:04:05+00:00): - For the name : effectivly long name is present on the ground : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=819125039117004  also with "variante like https://www.reflexcity.net/bruxelles/batiments/patrimoine/elements-classes/sites-semi-naturels-classes/vallee-du-vogelzangbeek sometimes with "vallée"  sometimes not , while the legal document for pretected area omit this ; so i think we can keep the long name BUT as mentioned by bxl-forever  that must match the billingual convention : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Brussels

Vogelzang should also be concerved as alt_name as it's in use.

For the boundaries : it was perfectly drawed according the document provided by the note author , but effectivly there is something that don't match because user provided a outdated document that was chanceled by the state council ; i reopen the note for this part. 

Have a good day.
Tom Ameye (2024-08-18 06:59:23+00:00): Seems to me to be a valid comment by RaphaelPasloin. Thanks for reopening the note.
Best regards,
Tom
berndw (2024-08-16 08:09:36+00:00): Hallo,

wllkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für deine Beiträge.

Ich habe diese Changeset wegen Fehler in den Daten revertiert.

Aber dazu eine Erklärung

Du hast den Eingang des Bolzplatz an ein Wegende in der Von-Arenberg-Straße angeklebt, ist korrigiert.

Den Knoten des Hofladens lösche ich noch

Für Fragen stehe ich zur Verfügung
literan (2024-08-17 12:31:40+00:00): этой правкой вы поломали зоны landuse=retail. Не делайте так больше, пожалуйста.
Samokat (2024-09-27 11:02:40+00:00): @literan
Извиняюсь. Спасибо за внимательность.
Достаточно сложным оказался полигон для редактирования при внесении правок. К сожалению, OSM не подсветил проблему при сохранении.