piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
map per (2023-08-06 18:46:49+00:00): Toll... den Benutzeraccount zu löschen löst leider kein einziges Problem, deine Daten bleiben drotzdem in der OSM Datenbank.
Rede lieber mit uns, die Fehler kann man alle wieder beheben.

Viele Grüße
map per
map per (2023-08-06 19:29:26+00:00): @audtr: Was machen wir jetzt? Ich würde den Änderungssatz reverten
audtr (2023-08-06 21:09:40+00:00): Als Nebenprodukt wurde sozusagen der Gehsteig ergänzt, der war erst nur bruchstückhaft vorhanden.
map per (2023-08-06 21:24:20+00:00): Stimmt, hab einen Teilrevert gemacht und die Gehwegstücke behalten
Dean Jenkins (2023-06-30 12:46:24+00:00): Local knowledge mainly :-) The footpath through the Churchyard I know well.
user_14538650 (2023-06-30 14:23:01+00:00): edit giỏi lắm :)
Leo Slager (2023-06-30 20:04:48+00:00): Die hele weg stond al op de kaart.
Deze changeset wordt weer reverted.
Leo Slager (2023-06-30 20:07:07+00:00): Be careful to change the map.
highways which are already on the map should not be added again.

And stop using Bing.
In stead use pdok which gives a better view on the ground.
Leo Slager (2023-06-30 20:08:10+00:00): Reverted with my changeset 137972674
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-30 13:10:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zamień addr:place na addr:city. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234727536

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
maro21 (2023-07-16 13:17:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137960205

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138578732
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-07-01 11:16:37+00:00): Hi! Please use bicycle=dismount instead of bicycle=no except inside building where bicycle are prohibited. Using bicycle no on a park path could create inaccessible buildings or playgrounds with some bicycle routing engines. Even when there is a no bike sign in a park, it is perfectly legal to dismount and walk alongside the bicycle. Thanks!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 04:20:59+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam tags for Two Men and a Truck POI in changeset 183721733

https://osm.org/changeset/183721733
MapTheWalk (2023-07-01 03:38:45+00:00): Hi ADsdjk23. May I inquire why you consider that bicycle parking racks at HDB void decks should be tagged as 'access=permissive'? Anyone can use these for their personal use.
Open to hear your point of view!
ADsdfjk23 (2023-07-01 10:00:19+00:00): Hi MapTheWalk.

This was based on the wiki stating that `access=yes` is "protected by the law". I wasn't sure if this was the case, and standardised on the more conservative `access=permissive`.

On a second glance, I'd agree that `access=yes` may be more accurate for those managed by public entities and intended for public use.

Hence open to changing them to `access=yes`.
MapTheWalk (2023-07-02 14:37:07+00:00): Hi ADsdjk23
Thanks for your reply and for your contribution. Looking at the wiki explanation for this specific item, it seems like public access ('yes') is applicable in these cases, at least in public housing, parks and roadside racks.

Sharing for your reference:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_parking#Tags
MapTheWalk (2023-07-02 14:41:18+00:00): I am also concerned about the adequacy (and usefulness) of tagging dropoff points for shared bicycles. I myself have mapped sporadically in the past, though not in a consistent fashion.

When reading through the wiki for 'bicycle_rental', the case of Singapore borders the case of virtual drop-offs, or 'bicycle_parking=floor'.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_rental#When_to_use_a_different_tagging_scheme

Keen to read your thoughts!
ADsdfjk23 (2023-07-02 16:23:02+00:00): Hi MapTheWalk,

Thanks for your input! I've changed the affected bicycle parkings to `access=yes`

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138030102
ADsdfjk23 (2023-07-02 16:25:08+00:00): With regards to the bicycle rental drop-offs, I agree that they are on the verge of being "virtual", which the wiki discourages mapping due to the likelihood of them being changed. 

Though I suspect this "likelihood to change" is be mitigated since (1) it's managed by LTA, and (2) for some, they utilise existing bicycle parking spots.

I also agree it has virtually no benefit for those who are already in the bicycle sharing ecosystem. It's added merely as part of an overall survey since (1) it doesn't really take much extra effort, and (2) it "transfers" the data onto the more-permissive ODbL 1.0 license for other people to use (whoever they may be).

Love to hear your opinion on this;
Nakaner-repair (2024-03-07 12:59:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148340823 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by 'babis b' because they were uploaded using MAPS.ME, look suspicious (ATM on roads) and the user is unresponsive.
Dodko (2023-08-18 20:31:20+00:00): Pre kreslenie nepoužívajte staré a posunuté Bing Maps Aerial ale novšie Ortofotomozaika SR 2020-2022
b-holdet (2023-07-08 13:17:06+00:00): Hej Kasper,

Du skal ikke sætte access=no på vejene, hvis der kan være trafik. Det betyder at ingen trafik må passere.
b-holdet (2023-07-08 13:37:09+00:00): Har skrevet en længere besked til Kasper. Håber at han vender tilbage.
marc__marc (2024-09-17 23:31:44+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164815552
il y a une information contradictoire :
il y aurait une bande partagée dans les 2 sens alors que la rue est en sens unique.
si la rue est sens unique, il ne sait pas y avoir de voie partagée en contre sens.
Cordialement,
Marc
fntamap (2024-09-18 08:25:25+00:00): Quand l’avenue des Prisonniers de guerre est devenue rue cyclable, cette caractéristique a été étendue sur quelques mètres dans les rues du Pont de pierres et François, qui étaient auparavant des sens uniques sauf vélos. Lors de la modification à ces deux morceaux de rue (Pont de pierrres ET François), les « oneway:bicycle no » ont malencontreusement disparu. Les voici rétablis.
eggie (2023-06-30 17:21:59+00:00): Dag Timo..

De naam van een bedrijf plus de aard ervan hoort op de adresnode.. dus niet op de gebouwomtrek.
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-09-10 18:36:00+00:00): Hi Schakkebroek.. Don't use access=yes on regular roads.
Thta's default.
Greetz,
eggie
map per (2023-08-06 18:18:29+00:00): Hallo MunichMapper99,

ich hab deinen Änderungssatz reverted. In der Tumblingerstraße gibt es schon seit längerem keine Radwege mehr, die wurden etwa anfang 2022 zurückgebaut.

Viele Grüße
map per
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-30 14:00:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11016098900
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164526412

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
maro21 (2023-06-30 17:52:29+00:00): Could you write exactly where these names are visible?

You are not the first person that adds these names. As you can see, for example, here https://osm.org/node/1601122872/history these names have been removed many times.
Kokp18 (2023-06-30 18:23:03+00:00): The German-speaking names are visible in the German version openstreetmap.de for all bigger cities and quite a lot of smaller ones. Let's please keep them in there, they are extremely helpful for orientation and for genealogy. Since the names are not shown in the international version openstreetmap.org, no harm is done keeping them.
maro21 (2023-07-01 22:19:59+00:00): I meant not about where these names would be visible [name:de], but from where you got this data. You wrote "Vgl. Orte in der umgebung" which I understood as "See places in the area". Which places?
BTW please use Polish or English in the changeset comments when you edit Poland.

Wrocław suburbs have no German names. Maybe they had before 1945. And if so, old_name:de is the right tag.
Kokp18 (2023-07-02 07:17:32+00:00): The data was already in the data sets under "old_name:de". If you need a source, I would be happy to refer to arcanum maps. I only want the names to be visible in the German version of openstreetmap, just like they are for all major towns and cities in Poland  (just like for Wrocław itself, where "name:de" is used). In Germany, the old names still have a relevance since the places are still known by those names in Germany (they are, for example, still officially used in ID cards and passports). 
Since "old_name:de" is not shown in openstreetmap.de but "name:de" is, I suggest we use this format then. The German names do not appartement in the international version of openstreetmap.org since they are not relevant internationally any more, but they appear in the German version, where they are still relevant today.
maro21 (2023-07-02 16:12:17+00:00): Not for all objects the data was already in the [old_name:de], for majority of them you added it, so where does this data come from? Arcanum maps? What is the license of the data there?

There are no German names for Polish suburbs. These are historical names and we cannot add historical names here in the name:de tag. They can be added in the old_name:de. Big cities or some popular tourism attractions do have German names - so the big German cities have Polish names.
You are new to OSM so please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_historic_events_and_historic_features and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability and add historical names to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map
maro21 (2023-07-02 16:15:00+00:00): and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:de
rskedgell (2023-09-18 10:39:07+00:00): I have prefixed the tags on the pontoon with removed:* in case you need to re-use the alignment for a future event.
eggie (2023-06-30 17:23:55+00:00): Timo

Gebruik de adresnode plus de tag amenity=school.
Kijk je nog even?
Mvg
eggie
eggie (2023-07-01 09:20:24+00:00): Volgens mij heet het hier CBS de Hoeksteen en Peuteropvang Spijkerhoek.
Welke namen staan op het gebouw?
Zou het adres ook kloppen?
 Nieuwe Schoolstraat?
Plantagestraat?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-07-01 10:02:03+00:00): Ik heb wat aangepast en een terugmelding gemaakt via Verbeter de Kaart
Syl (2023-07-19 19:03:21+00:00): Bonjour, la plante est au milieu de la route ?
Renouée-SMU (2023-07-21 21:21:45+00:00): Bonsoir,
La localisation des renouées est parfois faite sur le plan cadastral plutôt que sur la carte OSM. Cela se traduit parfois par des différences qui peuvent être surprenantes.
En tout cas Merci pour votre sagacité.
Cordialement
Syl (2023-07-21 23:54:16+00:00): Bonsoir, pouvez-vous corriger la position de ce nœud et le séparer de la route ?
Il est actuellement sur la route, que l'on regarde le cadastre, les données OSM ou les images de la BDOrtho.
Renouée-SMU (2023-07-22 05:26:26+00:00): Bonjour,
Effectivement ce nœud était mal positionné.
Aucune explication si ce n'est que la route l'a  "capté" (peu probable).
En tout cas Merci pour votre vigilance.
Cordialement
Syl (2023-07-22 08:52:31+00:00): Merci pour la correction.
CurlingMan13 (2023-06-30 17:16:44+00:00): The changeset was reverted since these paths/trails are visible from aerial imagery.  Access tags should be used instead rather than just deleting them.

Please do not delete trails/paths just because they are on private property.

For more on why these should be mapped, read here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137967523
Leo Slager (2023-06-30 20:15:06+00:00): Je hebt hier de weg open gezet voor alle motorvoertuigen.
Dat kan niet de bedoeling zijn.

Dit begint te lijken op vernieling van de kaart.
Graag een reactie.
literan (2023-06-30 17:01:12+00:00): appartments пишется с одной буквой p!!!
Patrickov (2023-07-04 02:25:52+00:00): Hi Sam, just curious, I found a fair number of your changes involving a new, blank node storing all KMB route relations, away from their original stops.  Is there any reasons that it is so?
samho1234567 (2023-07-04 03:22:04+00:00): Maybe it is a mistaken edit that I have created a new blank node?!

This adjustment only intend to add Citybus route 22, not editing the existing KMB routes. The existing KMB route relations are reviewed by others. I won't edit them.

Adding new route, bus platform and bus stop could lead to an amendment to the existing KMB routes, which I didn't intend to do so.

If blank node is not appropriate, please feel free to correct it. Thank you.
samho1234567 (2023-07-04 06:08:06+00:00): I figure out the reason why KMB route relation is affected. I split the road into different segments by using scissors tool. This might affect KMB routes. In fact, I'm not going to edit them.
Patrickov (2023-07-04 06:30:24+00:00): Scissoring a way is mostly OK if I remember correctly, although it might mess up a circular route including the said way (I also suspect this is only an issue if one scissors a bi-directional way).

Specifically for this change, the new nodes are more of a problem.  From my experience using iD, it sometimes makes new nodes when we actually intend to drag a way or an area, and its interface does not always display such changes obviously.
Patrickov (2023-07-04 07:22:39+00:00): One last thing:  If you find iD (or any other editor in this sense) responds to your dragging or other operations incorrectly, undo and try again.
Patrickov (2023-07-04 15:37:17+00:00): FYI, I have reversed the two Boundary Street nodes and adjusted the Lancashire Road one.
WoodWoseWulf (2023-07-05 00:35:15+00:00): Hi Armita you have the entirety of Quail Stream set as a culvert and looping back on itself. Is that correct?
Supaplex (2023-06-30 15:47:34+00:00): Hi, 

Why does your changeset spread across China and India? Please keep your changeset in a reasonable size. And do not remove those stuff still exist.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137962450
user_1566574 (2023-08-16 22:43:41+00:00): Hello !
Je me paye le culot sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7660873933 (voir l'historique https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/7660873933) ainsi que 2-3 autres objets, de supprimer l'adresse.

D'autres contributeurs m'ont informé il y a 2 ans de la non-nécessité d'ajouter ces informations, en particulier pays, ville et code postal. Ces 3 informations étant *dans* le périmètre d'Ornans, il n'est pas nécessaire de l'indiquer.
Et le numéro + nom de rue peuvent être obtenus par rapprochement avec le numéro en façade.

Par contre, il est possible de remplacer addr: par contact: (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:*#Addressing_scheme_in_France).

C'est juste un message pour être transparent, et aussi t'informer comme je l'ai été, après il y a possibilité de revenir à tes modifs si tu préfères.

PS : Je vois que tu as supprimé https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/8685855250, afin de garder un historique de l'objet, je suggère plutôt de simplement modifier ses attributs ? Ça m'a particulièrement été utile concernant cette boulangerie centenaire https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/6302353403, et aussi pour des bâtiments que certains réimportent en 2023 quand ceux (déjà importés en 2010 mais détruits en 2015) ont été supprimés d'OSM en 2022.
Bref, l'historique, ça aide ! ;P

PPS : Pourquoi avoir supprimé l'horloge ? :(
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/8715810426
PierreVivet (2023-08-20 20:02:50+00:00): Merci pour les remarques sur les adresses pour éviter des redondances, et sur le tag disused que je ne connaissais pas pour maintenir le cycle de vie de l'objet !
J'ai donc restauré ce commerce en attendant qu'un nouveau ouvre pour le mettre à jour.
Et de la même façon pour l'horloge je l'avais supprimée un peu vite à la fermeture du commerce, je l'ai restaurée et déplacée sur la façade de la nouvelle adresse de l'horloger.
user_5359 (2023-07-01 06:19:43+00:00): Willkommen beo OSM! Danke für diese Änderung. Die Sperre sollte aber mit dem betroffenen Weg verbunden sein und die Zugangsmöglichkeit (Schlüssel access) auch am Weg eingetragen werden (ist bereits erledigt).

Noch viel Spaß mit OSM!
maroone (2023-07-04 07:25:47+00:00): Danke und Sorry, wenn ich etwas falsch eingetragen habe. 
Ist das denn jetzt richtig? Die unpassierbare Stelle ist nur ca. 6-7 m breit. Jetzt steht aber der Text dazu an dem gesamten Weg nach rechts unten, der aber bis zu der Sperre benutzt werden kann als Sackgasse? Oder müsste eine getrennte kurze Linie mit dieser Beschreibung in der Länge der Sperre eingfügt werden?
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-26 05:11:47+00:00): Do not use descriptive names such as "Tall Grass"

These names and edits have been removed/reverted as appropriate.
Leo Slager (2023-06-30 20:20:26+00:00): foot=designated op een highway=footway is natuurlijk volledig overbodig.
Een footway is per definitie alleen toegankelijk voor wandelaars.
Probeer je eens in te lezen in de wiki over wat is een footway, path en track.
Voor dat je nog meer onzin op de kaart gaat zetten.
Als er vragen zijn kun je mij een berichtje sturen of een vraag stellen in het forum.
aceman444 (2023-07-14 21:01:50+00:00): Zaujimave, ako maju vsetky tie pumptracky rovnake pristupy. To ste tam asi neboli a len to trieskate po celom Slovensku rovnako podla sablony?
b-holdet (2023-07-02 05:33:18+00:00): Har Lejre Kommune flyttet rådhuset uden at ændre deres hjemmeside?

https://www.lejre.dk/kontakt/

Her er adressen:
Rådhuset i Hvalsø
Møllebjergvej 4
4330 Hvalsø
TT_Roskilde (2023-07-02 05:57:09+00:00): Ja, det var en smutter. Slettet igen. Tak for hjælp :)
aceman444 (2023-07-14 20:52:51+00:00): Zdravim, ten nazov pre pumptrack Zilina ci Kia je odkial? Lebo zase neuvadzate ziadne zdroje. Odkial viete ake sporty a dopravne prostriedky mozu na ten pumptrack?
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-14 10:07:48+00:00): déja existant, ajouté en double par toi et le plus ancien est https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5286843523
aceman444 (2023-07-14 04:13:04+00:00): sport=pumptrack, to vazne?
mapperue (2023-07-14 04:44:26+00:00): Na Slovensku sú značené dráhy pre pumptrack sport=pumptrack, používa sa tiež sport=cycling a cycling=pump_track.
aceman444 (2023-07-14 12:04:33+00:00): A co to teda znamena? Lebo na wiki nie je ziadna definicia. Tu znacku zavadzate Vy, alebo je to zase nejaky vymysel editora iD?

No to druha kombinacia uz je lepsia.
Ale v tvare cycling=pump_track, ktory je svetovo omnoho castejsi a je aspon navrhnuty na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Bicycle_sports
mapperue (2023-07-14 12:10:56+00:00): Používa sa aj sport=pumptrack. Často v kombinácii s bmx, cycling alebo mtb.
aceman444 (2023-07-14 12:19:33+00:00): Cize ste to len niekde videli a tak to pouzivate, ale inak viac o tom neviete?
mapperue (2023-07-14 13:15:01+00:00): Áno.
aceman444 (2023-07-14 20:39:39+00:00): Dobre, takze ked Vam je v podstate jedno aka to bude znacka, navrhujem pouzivat tu, ktora je uz zdokumentovana a je to presne to co potrebujete (pumptrack). Cize podla https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Bicycle_sports sport=cycling + cycling=pump_track.
user_5359 (2023-06-30 19:34:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I delete your SEO SPAM (mostly  foreign keys).
Filip009CZ (2024-10-07 14:24:17+00:00): Zdravím, nebolo by lepšie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11016318513 namiesto water_level použiť rainfall? Alebo to fakt meria výšku vodnej hladiny?
VSA_ (2024-10-07 16:46:44+00:00): Neznám všechny značky, proto jsem použil, co mě přišlo nejpodobnější. Opraveno.
Filip009 (2024-10-07 16:49:17+00:00): To ani ja, len sa stačí pozrieť na wiki ;)
mkopinsky (2023-06-30 16:03:46+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137964748
mkopinsky (2023-06-30 16:05:00+00:00): Whoops, that comment was intended for the original changesets not the revert
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-01 05:50:34+00:00): I don't think it is the first time this user has done it.  Also, their changesets of "yes" are not very helpful.  I've commented on their changesets previously, to no avail.
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-07 07:58:20+00:00): attention doublon
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-07 07:57:22+00:00): le collège était déja renseigné depuis 5 ans (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1298750463), doublon pas utile, je l'ai supprimé.

la correction effectué en supprimant dans le nom #L3Pro était bonne cependant
Vinber-Pro (2023-07-14 10:07:05+00:00): l'hotel existe déja depuis 5 ans, si il y a des améliorations, le faire sur l'objet existant https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5286843523
NorthCrab_upload (2023-06-30 17:00:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5485253253

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Patchanka (2023-06-30 17:04:46+00:00): source BANO
rogersclan (2023-07-01 05:15:39+00:00): The lnk why we won't does not work.  Please clarify why somebodies private property and illegal trails are published.  Also how do I appeal your decision or can we talk on the phone,
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-01 05:53:42+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
rogersclan (2023-07-01 06:04:22+00:00): Thank you sir.  just to be clear, what you see on aerial imagery are not passagle road.  they are long old and abandon roads that are no longer passable.  By changing them to access private, does this limit the sharablility of these trails to others mapping programs that use this data set?  Thank you.
Frans S (2023-08-13 12:15:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
 A new mapper !  Welcome. We hope you will enjoy  mapping.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: C: Not accurately drawn and squared.
B: Overlapping buildings.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
E. Buildings not squared.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137967962
Syl (2023-07-01 08:22:20+00:00): Bonjour, le tag "surveillance=camera" n'a pas l'air correct.
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-08 01:51:10+00:00): Make sure you square your buildings.  "q" can be pressed to make the buildings square and have 90 degree corners.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137968279
Qwajo OSM (2023-06-30 22:22:04+00:00): a good changeset comment is as important as the mapping being done. Good mapping but lets get the changeset comment right.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137968396
CRCulver (2023-11-03 16:53:03+00:00): At 32.80136, -117.24724, is there really no motor-vehicle traffic from west to east on Diamond Street?