piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-09-22 09:27:03+00:00): Hello  Thanks for mapping.
Please use the tag path in rural areas when you want to map a narrow trace.
And, don't add a crossing tag. (makes no sense here)
As a matter of fact, there is no need to map these traces for this project.
Important are traces connecting houses, settlements etc.
Best regards
Luzandro (2024-12-23 19:00:20+00:00): Hallo,

wenn du Gehsteige als separate ways erfasst, erstelle bitte auch unmarked crossings an den Kreuzungen bei abgesenktem Gehsteig

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:crossing%3Dunmarked

ansonsten wird das Fußgängerrouting dadurch ziemlich kaputt, siehe z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_foot&route=48.154935%2C16.263676%3B48.155045%2C16.263722#map=19/48.154451/16.264842&layers=N

selbst dieses Routing ist nur möglich, weil der Router das (falsche) access=private bei der folgenden Zufahrt ignoriert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209339395
ansonsten könnte man nur um den Häuserblock im Kreis laufen und würde nie von dort weg kommen
Bienson (2023-09-21 16:46:52+00:00): Wenn dieser Weg nicht im letzten Jahr asphaltiert wurde, ist es definitiv kein tracktype=grade1 (und kein surface=asphalt)
AmyCupcake (2023-09-20 19:35:17+00:00): Using Google Streetview to edit OSM is not permitted by Google
CloCkWeRX (2024-09-14 15:02:33+00:00): Marco Polo was clearly named as Marco Polo foods; you have arbitrarly merged it with the clothing company.
Olaf der Mapper (2023-09-23 23:45:39+00:00): Ich weiß nicht, obs dir aufgefallen ist, aber du hast hier (vmtl. ungewollt) einen Acker zum Wald gemacht. LG Olaf
Frans S (2023-10-26 10:42:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
You mapped all the streams here just in the wrong direction. Uphill instead of downhill.
Use the opentopomap imagery . It shows height lines.
Rodrigo Rega (2024-12-07 18:16:50+00:00): Reverted because fictional mapping.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160035732
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-20 14:00:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Majscowa":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11205282037
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463715
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488463717
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905061577
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905061721
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/940992101
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/945425107
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105507278
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133989606
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1133989612

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Rodrigo Rega (2024-12-07 18:32:58+00:00): Reverted because this user had made a lot of fictional mapping. He does not answered the questions made by the community. His edits are not reliable.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160036104
R0bst3r (2023-09-24 18:06:11+00:00): Hallo KaliPhobos,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141515682
Weathering (2023-09-20 14:29:47+00:00): service tag가 들어가면 이게 개통된걸로 인식이 되는건가요?
rhtb0 (2023-09-20 15:12:33+00:00): 네 태그상 construction 이외의 태그들을 넣으면 개통한 것으로 인식됩니다.
highway=construction, construction=emergency_access(도로의 종류)만 넣으면 공사중으로 인식합니다. 다른 태그를 넣으면 오류가 생길수 있습니다.
MxxCon (2023-09-23 20:40:38+00:00): Probably worth commenting on the original changeset so that they are aware and won't come back the next time to clubber this change again.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141515814
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-02-16 03:59:03+00:00): Hallo nortvest,

bitte nicht "village_green" für irgendwelche Gras- und Grünflächen benutzen. village_green ist ein für besondere öffentliche Plätze, die es vor allem in England gibt.

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dvillage_green

Für einfache Grasflächen kannst Du landuse=grass stattdessen verwenden.
M!dgard (2023-09-20 14:12:44+00:00): This reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141510663 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141513096
M!dgard (2023-09-20 14:12:57+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141510663 for rationale
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-20 14:20:23+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4931132808

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
blackjack200 (2023-09-20 18:15:15+00:00): Witam, zmieniłem lokalizacje sklepu, w innej edycji zmieniłem również miejsce na mapie.
NorthCrab (2023-09-20 18:21:03+00:00): Okej :-) Jest w porządku !
swinetown (2023-09-20 17:29:07+00:00): Hi Puxim, I've reverted your edits changing the road catagories and numbers through Wantage town centre.

Road signage says that the A338 no goes through the shopping area itself, by the looks of it this was changed about 10 years ago.

Google Maps still classes the roads as you've put them but this is outdated; please refer to ground truth rather than other maps.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-20 14:40:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Łazy Dębowieckie":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419780547
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471145967
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/598748009
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/598754873
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984507619

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Tatfahren (2023-09-20 20:19:55+00:00): I modified this quest for fences and gates, need to add a own quest for that when i find the time.
citrula (2023-09-20 14:59:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If a POI is misplaced, it is better to move it to the correct position if possible rather than deleting and recreating it. This keeps the history intact and helps future editors.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141517328
citrula (2023-09-20 15:00:06+00:00): You can press "Q" to square the corners of objects in iD :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141517669
Hb- (2024-08-25 01:55:00+00:00): Warum wurde hier der Marktplatz in Stolberg als Multipolygon r16355378 angelegt? Warum nicht als einfache Fläche?
user_msh (2024-08-29 07:58:45+00:00): ... war im "Schnelldurchlauf" für die Relation "Wanderweg Lutherweg" vor 11 Monaten so mit angelegt worden. Inwieweit die Ausdehnung der Fußgängerzone reicht, wollten wir vor Ort noch überprüfen und die Fläche / Polygon entsprechend erweitern / vervollständigen. Kann gerne geändert / aktualisiert werden. VG user_msh.
Hb- (2024-08-29 11:37:15+00:00): Danke. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155920905
user3721 (2023-09-20 23:24:16+00:00): *Gagel ofc
jeslop (2023-11-06 17:00:06+00:00): Changeset reverted due to fictional mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143702239
xephos1one (2023-10-14 09:20:13+00:00): Hi.
Please be more careful in your changesets when reclassifying the roads so you don't forget some sections like way/8964059, way/552591047 and some others.
Also you downgraded some mayor roads in residential areas and others from secondary straight to residential - tertiary would be the better choice for them, for example in this changeset Coleman Road, Meridian Avenue and Redmond Avenue. Another example is the Great Oaks Parkway/Boulevard near the Blossom Hill station.
Oh and please don't reclassify a road like in way/552591048 to a _link - secondary (without _link!) is perfectly fine here. I'll fix that one for you in my last changeset for reclassifying Monterey Road to primary.
Minh Nguyen (2023-10-15 00:25:06+00:00): Changeset 142595843 promotes the minor through streets to highway=tertiary.
karr4s (2026-02-10 10:02:08+00:00): Bonjour.
Pour information : le SIRET de cet établissement (désormais fermé) est erroné. Il s'agit d'une entreprise située à Caen.
Cela ne nécessite pas de correction de votre par car le local situé à Lisieux a changé d'activité. Mais pensez à vérifier les données que vous ajoutez à l'avenir.
Bonne journée.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-02-10 10:27:36+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de votre alerte, nous allons corriger cette donnée

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
maraf24 (2024-04-10 12:03:27+00:00): Własnie ktoś przywrócił tu primary.
gogorm (2023-09-20 21:27:48+00:00): Hey, welcome to OSM.

This cycle lane wasn't missing from Lombard Street.
It is already mapped using the cycleway tag here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49974586#map=19/53.34478/-6.24886

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway for more about this approach to mapping cycle lanes.

Your approach of mapping a cycle lane/track as a separate way is common in some cases, but not typically done for a cycle lane like this which is an inherent part of the road.

I'm not here to convince to you choose one cycle lane/track mapping approach over the other, but to make sure you are aware of these two approaches.

Using both approaches for the same section of cycle lane/track should not be done as it results in duplication of information. So you should either keep the separetely mapped way, or change/remove the cycleway tags on the main road way.

The CycleOSM map layer is a handy way to see what cycle facilities have been mapped. The map layer can be changed in the menu on the right hand side of the screen on osm.org, if you didn't know.
Timothée Laurent (2023-09-21 06:59:00+00:00): Hi, thanks for the comment! I am new to OSM and did not know about the cycleway tag, or the CycleOSM map layer so this is very useful! In this case, the northbound cycleway lane was already drawn, so I assumed the southbound one was missing as well. Does this mean the northbound one was already redundant with the tag? In a case like this, where cycle lanes are rather separate from the road, while still being technically on the road, would it be more appropriate to use a tag, or a dedicated cycle way?
Thank you,
I am happy to update or revert my change if needed.
gogorm (2023-09-21 21:25:01+00:00): The northbound cycle lane here is not really redundant when used in combination with the cycleway:right=separate tag, because "separate" has a special meaning unlike the other values of the cycleway tag.
If the value was something like cycleway:right=lane, then yes,that would be redundant if there was already a separately mapped cycle lane.

When the value of the cycleway tag is "separate" that means the cycle lane/track was drawn as a separate way. It's not a requirement to put that value in when mapping a cycle lane/track as a separate way, but some choose to do so.

About the southbound cycle arrangements on Lombard Street with the parallel car parking, it's a tricky one. In my opinion this should just be a cycleway:left=lane on the main road way since it's so close to the road and you can technically enter/leave the general traffic lanes in the gaps between parked cars without a kerb obstructing your way. However as the car parking on this road does distance the southbound cycle lane from the general traffic lanes, I imagine some would argue that this merits a cycleway:left=track or even a separately drawn way.

I've made a small update on this road to keep the separately drawn way because I don't like to undo effort of drawing a separate way when it is technically valid.
Frans S (2023-09-20 15:27:49+00:00): Hello. I noticed that you validated this task. 962. 
Don't you pay attention to correct tagging of highways ?
Often through going highways are tagged as track, which is not correct. 
They ought to be changed  into the correct tag. like residential, unclassified.
Best regards
karitotp (2023-09-20 23:47:56+00:00): Hello, 
Thank you for your comment, I just changed the tag of those highways to residential.
Regards.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-12-30 03:55:42+00:00): Could you confirm whether this is complete as mapped here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160531993
Joseph R P (2024-12-30 20:50:12+00:00): Thank you for letting me know. These edits appear to all be incorrect and I have reverted them and left them a comment. This person seems to be a bit reckless with their changes, as they are updating highway construction through StreetComplete seemingly without checking if the roads are open first. In fact, I don't believe there's any actual surveying going on as they site in their source, in person or through online sources, since they're rapidly editing all over the place. Previously, they incorrectly updated a road near where I live that had only started construction this year (and is still going through the grading process) to a completed road. If you at some point come across any more edits of theirs that seem suspicious (especially roads around the Virginia/DMV area), I'll gladly look into them.
jmsbert (2023-12-28 20:02:17+00:00): Hello,
thanks for contributing to OSM and this Humanitarian project in Brasil. You requested to get a feedback on your mapping. In general it is OK. The issues I spotted are often found with new mappers - but easiliy to avoid.
1. squaring building contures - buildings have mostly 90° corner - simply hit "q" key in the editor to square buildings (here is a video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
2. shared nodes between buildings and / or buildings/highways. simply zoom in to avoid and disable the snapping by pressing "alt-key" while placing nodes - video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
Keep on mapping - as every contributions is highly appreciated!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141519147
jmsbert (2023-12-28 20:05:57+00:00): P.S. you can see a nice visualization of your changeset here: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141519147/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141519147
nicfer (2023-09-21 13:40:25+00:00): Hola.
La ciclovia ya estaba mapeada en la misma calle, y si no está segregada físicamente (como lo es esta de 12), no se usa vía aparte. Ahora lo revierto, pero te aviso para que no vuelvas a agregarla.
Dimitar155 (2023-09-20 17:06:21+00:00): Това ще да е доста голям магазин за подаръци. Даже си има няколко парка :). Всичко е оправено, но "фантомната" сграда вероятно ще се показва още няколко дена на някои места.
jmsbert (2023-12-27 21:49:14+00:00): Hello arigu1 and welcome to OSM,
I just came across your contribution in Brasil. There are some issues you might improve for future edits: buildings are normally rectangular - so please square these before uploading (here is a video on this topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o 
There were cases ob overlapping objects. A good method to avoid this is to zoom in to enable to draw objects close together without overlapping. 
Finally you added a parking area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209449878) - what was your source for this decision - for me it looks more like a common building (fixed this).
Anyways: Keep on mapping and contributing to OSM and HOT projects.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141519932
leero999 (2024-01-21 23:23:29+00:00): le corsie ciclabili in viale Nenni dovrebbero essere segnalate come a questa pagina, in questo gruppo di modifiche sono segnate come fossero piste ciclabili e non corsie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Biciclette
mau59 (2024-01-22 12:15:47+00:00): Ringrazio per la segnalazione. Provvedo quanto prima alla rettifica.
Jakka (2023-09-20 16:30:19+00:00): on which intersection you got warning ?
supadomi (2023-09-20 21:45:53+00:00): I think it was 1579658044 (the bus stop called ‘Houffalize Dépôt TEC’) but I am not 100% sure.
First time I’ve seen warnings like these - is there any way to ‘reproduce’ them, apart from reverting my edits and repeat them?
kwiatek_123 (2023-09-20 17:43:49+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141525132
jmsbert (2023-12-28 20:28:09+00:00): Hello r_su01,
thanks for contribution to this project of HOT in Brazil. You requested to get a feedback on your mapping.
Looking at this changeset it seems that you mapped the buildings very coarsely, e.g. drawing one conture around multiple buildings - instead please map buildings individually to get a better representation of the reality. Also remember to square the buildings you add (90° corners are mostly found with buildings) - here is a short video created by MissingMaps focussing on buildings: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&t=13s
Keep on mapping as every contribution is highly appreciated!
P.S. here is a nice visualization of this changeset: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141520410/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141520410
user_5359 (2023-09-21 16:56:22+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/11205512678. What is the mean of the tag -- = ?
Noonien (2023-09-21 21:23:08+00:00): Thank you for the review, I guess that was the zoom-out-shortcut while focussing the entry field :-/
I removed the tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141578380
user_5359 (2023-09-20 19:38:59+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1209454188. What is the mean of the tag paths=level 4?
I assume you mean highway=track, tracktype=grade4. This is only necessary for the way not for the nodes. I will correct this.
jeslop (2023-11-06 17:00:07+00:00): Changeset reverted due to fictional mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143702239
BCNorwich (2023-09-21 07:41:45+00:00): Hi, The tag highway=road is not valid, the highway tag should = the highway status, (trunk, residential, etc.).

The tag building=house indicates a single dwelling. It looks like these buildings are all two dwellings. As such the tag should be building=residential. If you divide the building into separate dwellings then each part can be tagged building=house.

Lastly, why have you deleted a footpath that can clearly be seen on imagery?

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2023-09-21 07:58:30+00:00): Hi, I've looked at several of your recent changesets and there are many problems. It might be best not to upload more for the time being but go back to rectify the issues.

Regards Bernard
jnighan (2024-01-21 18:57:55+00:00): I removed service=yard from the main line at the north end of the track. 

"A line within the yard should selected as the "main route", and the service tag should not be applied to it."

Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dyard
RailandSea (2024-01-21 22:23:34+00:00): Thanks I must forgotten to remove it. They did all the new work to those tracks with the PTC after the last accident.
balint36 (2023-11-26 19:44:02+00:00): Thank you for contributing but next time please be more aware because you made many mistake at Karcag station.
ibnduck (2023-09-20 19:03:47+00:00): Hi rafikm0h,

Welcome to OSM and thank you for contributing :)

Please consider writing descriptive changeset comments for your future edits. 

Have a look on why that's useful on this wiki page: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.
tsp15 (2023-09-20 20:19:56+00:00): Skąd to "bicycle=yes"? Dostęp jest tylko dla mieszkańców i nie ma tam dopuszczenia rowerów.
olo81 (2023-09-20 20:26:29+00:00): Bo rowery nie mają rejestracji jak samochody.
tsp15 (2023-09-20 20:38:32+00:00): Nie sądzę, żeby to coś zmieniało. Znaki dotyczą rowerów tak samo jak samochodów, nieważne czy mają rejestrację. 
Za https://gliwice.policja.gov.pl/ka9/informacje/wiadomosci/313669,Internauci-pytaja-my-odpowiadamy.html :
"Znak B-1 czy B-2 dotyczy wszystkich kierujących, także jednośladami. Ewentualne wyłączenie pod znakiem, np. „nie dotyczy mieszkańców", zwalnia z zakazu jedynie mieszkańców, a pozostali uczestnicy ruchu nadal nie są w takim wypadku uprawnieni do wjazdu za znak pionowy. Wyjątek stanowi umieszczona tabliczka T-22, która może uprawniać jednoślady do wjazdu za omawiany znak. Niestosowanie się do znaku B-1 może skutkować mandatem w kwocie do 500 zł."
olo81 (2023-09-20 20:42:57+00:00): Pytanie brzmi kto i jak miałby sprawdzać rowerzystów?
aixbrick (2023-09-21 12:32:39+00:00): Hello,
I think, that's already mapped: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11049356092.
Regards
LucGommans (2023-09-21 15:08:43+00:00): Oh! Just checked how come I missed it, turns out it's there on osmand but only with some extreme zoom https://snipboard.io/HIWyAa.jpg :D

Thanks for the hint! I have removed my duplicate
aixbrick (2023-09-21 15:55:22+00:00): :-)
jmsbert (2023-12-29 18:17:02+00:00): Hello ndesart,
welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing to this humanitarian project of HOT in Brasil.
I am just reviewing the results of the project and fixing smaller issues. Looking at your edits I have the following hints you might consider to improve your mapping quality.
1. squaring buildings - most buildings have 90° angled corners. Even in cases of partly covered roofs (e.g. by a trees) the shape is very likely still rectangular. To achieve 90° angles: simply hit "q" key to square the selected building; video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&t=13s
2. avoid unintended shared nodes between buildings and landuses, highways, etc. While creating the objects press the "Alt" key disable the auto-snapping behaviour in the editor: video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Keep on mapping - every contribution is highly appreciated!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141521986
muralito (2023-09-20 22:43:09+00:00): Please, one feature, one element. There should be only one amenity=hospital.
LeNetsi (2023-09-21 21:21:14+00:00): Hello Muralito!

 I see that OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital) does state that only a singular amenity feature is needed. As the amenity already existed on the building, I will remove my area feature. Thanks pointing that out!
adamh (2023-09-22 02:57:51+00:00): Where is this data sourced from? The changeset says "Esri World Imagery", which seems unlikely to be sufficient for the detail provided.
Casey Painter (2023-09-21 05:57:07+00:00): This park exists?
VLD300 (2023-09-21 15:31:03+00:00): Hello Casey Painter,

Thanks for reaching out! Based on imagery there does not seem to be a park present here, and the name that was attached to the park leads to a youtube channel.
silversurfer83 (2023-09-20 19:15:41+00:00): Gude :)

kleiner Tip für Änderungen in Hessen: Die aktuellen Bilder sind praktisch immer Hessen DOP20 und diese sind auch am besten ausgerichtet.

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141523387
KiddiKai (2023-09-22 08:37:08+00:00): Cool, das wusste ich noch nicht. Werde ich in Zukunft verwenden. Danke!
silversurfer83 (2023-09-22 10:04:54+00:00): Kein Ding :)

In JOSM findest du sogar die Katasterdaten von Hessen (Hintergrund - > Karte - > ALKIS)

Bei den Hintergründen immer gucken ob was schönes dabei ist. Einige Bundesländer haben auch die hillshade Karten im Angebot 🤩

Und mit etwas trickserei bekommst du sogar die strava heatmap eingebunden. Damit lassen sich Waldwege ganz hervorragend einzeichnen

Weiter viel Spaß :)