piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
habi (2025-10-09 20:23:39+00:00): Ciao imulle

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

Wenn ich https://www.carplanet.ch/aaretal-garage-muensingen/marken anschaue, dann steht da nix von Polestar.
Und wenn ich die OpenStreetMap-Konventionen anschaue, dann gehört das auch nicht in den Namen der Garage.
Ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173067467 etwas angepasst.
E Gruess us Bärn,
Habi
imulle (2025-10-11 12:58:36+00:00): Ciao Habi
Der Polestar Hub in Bern wird geschlossen und wird in Zukunft am Standort Münsingen in der Aaretal Garage als Teil der Carplanet Gruppe neu aufgebaut. Die Umbau-Arbeiten beginnen in den nächsten Wochen.
Gruess
imulle
NeisBot (2025-09-23 09:21:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-28 10:20:19+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172358166
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-23 15:39:16+00:00): Hello, please be more careful when making these (semi-)automated edits, as they appear to be. The low speed limits, shops lined on their side, and their surface are a pretty good indicator that these are meant to be pedestrian streets. This is further supported by the fact that Tivoli Village was meant to resemble 1400s Europe. Thank you.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172351012
sarya_Lyft (2025-09-24 08:38:47+00:00): Hi Flap Slimy Outward,

My name is Surander and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft.
Thank you for your notification regarding my edits in Tivoli Village and for reverting them.
I sincerely apologize for this error and for any inconvenience it may have caused. My decision to reclassify the highway as a 'service' road was based on an analysis of recent data. Specifically, the Lyft-owned background (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GXsnDGWoNGjzG4R_1XHh836LzH4426rF/view?usp=sharing) from January 2025 and Lyft-telemetry from the past week (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZShJUyq2hiuAXPpbVsIz718sewTbgHdw/view?usp=sharing), that we are used for edits indicated the presence of parked vehicles and active vehicle movement, which I interpreted as general access. However, I did indeed overlook the road surface and other indicators. I apologize for the error and appreciate your diligence.

The screenshots will be available for a month. Please let me know if you are unable to view them within this timeframe – I could generate them once again.

Happy Mapping!
Best Regards, Surander
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-09-24 15:17:17+00:00): Thank you for responding; I didn't expect this, LOL. It's common for "streets" (as they are defined according to Strong Towns) to have streetside parking, possibly to narrow the street, causing drivers to be more careful. Pedestrian streets don't always forbid cars per se, but if they're allowed, they are treated as "guests" while the pedestrians are given normal access.
Supaplex (2025-09-24 00:49:59+00:00): 其實，可以直接寫明馬太鞍溪橋遭沖毀，讓大家知道已經更新了
pitfire (2025-09-23 10:48:24+00:00): Nonsens Änderungsbeschreibung.
Nachtrag Adresse passt besser!
Patchanka (2025-10-14 06:43:13+00:00): bonjour
est-ce que par hsard, ces toilettes ne seraient pas ceux qui sont déjà enregistré dans OSM ici ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3027468361
HellMap (2025-12-04 00:01:12+00:00): Čau,

Zīmējot elementus kā laukumus, lūdzu apvieno (redaktorā C) tos ar iepriekš iezīmētiem punktiem, ja tādi ir. Citādi datos ir nepareizi dubultēti elementi vienam objektam.

Šajā gadījumā zīmējot parkingu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1432250288 , palika iepriekšējais https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11662459248 .

No citām vietām parkingi:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424112624
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1431575888
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429488909
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1431575879
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1431575863
u.c.
Branko Kokanovic (2025-09-24 13:50:47+00:00): Stalno menjate granice i stalno menjate klasifikacije puteva. I posle upozorenja i komentara zajednice. Opet cemo revertovati izmene.
---
You are consistently changing borders and road classification even after warnings from community. We will revert these changes again
Branko Kokanovic (2025-09-24 14:00:45+00:00): Dodji na forum na https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64 ili na Telegram na https://t.me/osm_sr da nam objasnis sta radis i zasto
---
Come to forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs/64 or at Telegram at https://t.me/osm_sr so we can help and understand your intent!
NeisBot (2025-09-23 10:12:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-28 10:19:59+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172358007
zabop (2025-09-23 10:33:52+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments. "й" on its own does not seem to be meaningful. If I'm missing something, please enlighten me.
enzo_immergis (2026-02-26 17:50:11+00:00): Bonjour Momo-Maurice(CD84),

Je viens de voir que cette piste cyclable est en travaux. Pour éviter toute confusion (not. pour les calculateurs d'itinéraires), il est conseillé de mettre highway=construction puis construction=cycleway.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135440149/history

D'ailleurs, est-ce qu'il y a une date de réouverture ?

Je m'occupe de faire les modifications.

Merci pour ta contribution ! 

Bonne journée,
Enzo
dypa (2025-10-22 15:19:07+00:00): При указании размеченных не регулируемых пешеходных переходов нельзя использовать тег crossing=zebra, см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:crossing=zebra

Пожалуйста при внесении следующих правок используйте теги (Размеченный (нерегулируемый) пешеходный переход)
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing:markings=zebra

Заранее спасибо!
Razieru (2025-10-24 21:29:50+00:00): Спасибо. А я обычно не прописываю теги вручную, а просто заполняю через iD предложенные поля. Тогда сейчас пробегусь по всем зебрам что уже поставил и поправлю
custodiankeyy (2025-09-23 19:53:47+00:00): Peki hastanenin olduğu bina hala duruyor mu? Binayı da kaldırmışsınız.
TÜRKKAN YMM (2025-09-23 19:58:54+00:00): Bina duruyor lakin mülk sahibi binayı sattı yeni sahibi bina komple kiraya vermek için emlak firması bıraktı şuan da bina şirketlere kira verilmek üzere bekliyor.
custodiankeyy (2025-09-23 20:13:14+00:00): Cevabınız için teşekkür ederim. Bina kısmını geri ekledim.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172362689
Vaidotas (2025-09-23 17:17:11+00:00): Is this really an "emergency_access_point"? I think you might be mixing it up with "assembly_point", which marks gathering location during an emergency, e.g. fire. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dassembly_point
griba (2025-09-23 17:21:11+00:00): Yes, fixed. Thanks!
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-10-15 14:16:07+00:00): Đoạn vào đai học Hà Nội hiện có một đoạn đường là đường 2 chiều như tôi đã chỉnh sửa. Xin hỏi tại sao bạn lại xoá đi và đưa về trạng thái cũ? Lần gần đây nhất bạn đi vào đường này là khi nào?
Hung Tran 9x0 (2025-10-15 14:16:59+00:00): Tôi thấy khá khó chịu khi những người như bạn không chịu tìm hiểu và kiểm chứng những chỉnh sửa mới của người khác.
kamasytrix (2025-09-23 19:29:58+00:00): Згідно правил адреси порібно писати 3-А
TinPetreković (2025-09-26 12:39:00+00:00): Fixed in changeset 172483649

Removed tags from accidentally tagged roads

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172483649
NeisBot (2025-09-23 11:03:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-28 10:19:34+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/172339018
NeisBot (2025-09-23 11:27:40+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-28 10:18:47+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/172559552
bartgron (2025-09-23 21:08:52+00:00): Kałuża usunięta:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172364531
Nie dodajemy takich obiektów do mapy
eggie (2025-09-23 11:47:10+00:00): Dag Irene... Dat gaat niet zo. Er is ook geen streaatnaam met 'Linksaf voor brandweer mogelijk (prio 1)'.

Ik heb die virtuele doorsteek verwijderd en aan de afslagbeperking (relatie) toegevoegd : 
except=emergency
Als het goed is kan LiveNav daar mee overweg.


MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-23 11:49:28+00:00): Ah je bedoelt waarschijnlijk van west naar noord?
Dan wordt het even puzzelen.
eggie (2025-09-23 12:05:15+00:00): Van west naar noord ook de afslagbeperking uitgebreid met except=emergency op de relatie Niet linksafslaan.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

except 	=psv / bicycle / hgv / motorcar / emergency 	The restriction does not apply to these vehicle types (more than one: except=bicycle;psv) 



MVG
eggie
IrenevanderZwan (2025-09-23 12:22:44+00:00): Hoi,
dankjewel, daarom had ik ook "nakijken' aangevinkt; ik wist niet of dit de juiste oplossing was.
eggie (2025-09-23 12:28:54+00:00): Irene..
Je zult op meerdere kruispunten deze situaties tegenkomen. Dan is het dus noodzaak de afslagbeperking -relatie te openen en dan except=emergency toe te voegen.
Groet,
eggie
IrenevanderZwan (2025-09-23 12:35:14+00:00): Ik zie nu even niet hoe je het hebt opgelost....
eggie (2025-09-23 12:44:16+00:00): Dan zul je naar de relatie moeten kijken from >via> to
Dus stukje Verspronckweg voor de kruising> de node op de kruising> het door jou ingetekende wegdeel.

Dat zie je alleen als je de relatie opent.
IrenevanderZwan (2025-09-23 15:01:31+00:00): Ok, bedankt!
TrickyFoxy (2025-09-27 18:42:35+00:00): 👋 К сожалению Яндекс.Карты использовать нельзя
Andrsur (2025-10-09 23:06:57+00:00): Да, я только узнал, но я там был и данные все равно верные
NeisBot (2025-09-23 12:17:12+00:00): Hi najla alhajri, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added house with address and building attributes and created related ways and nodes"
Mister_R2 (2025-09-23 12:07:24+00:00): tunnel*
felipeeugenio (2025-09-23 15:15:41+00:00): Hola. No parece ser una calle residencial. Pasa algo con el ruteo de carros bomba?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172341021
vschild (2025-09-23 15:22:05+00:00): Es una calle que queda justo al cuartel de bomberos, se usa para salir hacia cualquier dirección. El problema es que las API que usan la informacion de OSM no la estan considerando para despacho de emergencias. (Igual es una calle que usan autos).
Saludos
aquí la puedes ver: https://www.google.com/maps/@-39.8088731,-73.2569962,3a,75y,95.12h,72.45t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1slHzbxVP1YFFT6UIfNAg3tg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D17.545788721453448%26panoid%3DlHzbxVP1YFFT6UIfNAg3tg%26yaw%3D95.11587163210636!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDkxNy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
felipeeugenio (2025-09-23 16:16:51+00:00): ok, mira... alguien la va a cambiar en algún minuto, porque noe s una calle residencial. Lo que hay que hacer es cambiar el software de Ruteo, porque hay retornos especiales para vehículos de emergencia incluso en autopistas, y Ahí si que no van a poder usar una calle residencial.

saludos
vschild (2025-09-23 16:22:53+00:00): Y cuál sería la mejor descripción? Porque si es una calle donde transitan autos, no solo vehículos de emergencia. Saludos
felipeeugenio (2025-09-23 18:28:40+00:00): Esa calle es totalmente un =service.
No mapeamos para calzar ruteos con software, mapeamos lo que hay en terreno.
Pero es claramente un tema con el ruteador y no del mapa. 

Saludos
vschild (2025-09-23 18:36:11+00:00): Gracias, la deje como service. Salu2
onion42 (2025-09-25 13:15:02+00:00): Hi Nigel and welcome to OSM! Thank you so much for helping out! 

I just wanted to point out that the roads in the parking lot should be highway=service not "unclassiefied". 
You can read the details on the Wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
eggie (2025-09-23 12:41:36+00:00): Dag Egbert.

Ik heb access=no verwijderd.
Combinaties van met andere accesstags zijn eigenlijk allemaal verkeerd gebruikt. Waarom access=no?

Waar begint het gras? Staat dat hek daar nog? 

MVG
eggie
Sammyhawkrad (2025-11-13 11:53:09+00:00): Bonjour, les frontières que vous avez ajoutées ici en Côte d'Ivoire traversent les frontières internationales vers le Ghana.
hatul (2025-09-24 16:50:55+00:00): תודה על התוספות.
אם השאר נעול לפעמים כדאי להוסיף את המידע הזה.
השתמש בתגית opening_hours וגם בתיאור.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-09-23 13:05:21+00:00): This changeset had been fully reverted in osm.org/changeset/172343717
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-09-23 13:12:17+00:00): Since Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Dao) now controlled by China, since OSM‘s common practise and it will be mapped with the country's language. I know you may say this is a disputed area and some other countries have claim on it, but according to some basic guideline, such as "on the ground", we mapped it to the country that have real control on it.
hatul (2025-09-24 21:15:06+00:00): שלום נועם

שביל השרון כבר לא רציף בגלל מחיקה של שבילים.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62229509
האם יש לו דרך חלופית?
A67-A67 (2025-09-27 16:44:07+00:00): This, and similar edits, have multiple issues: 
- The housenumber is added to the addr:street tag.
- The postcode contains a whitespace
- The operator is added to the name tag

I've resolved these issues here and in the other edits.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-09-29 14:06:17+00:00): 

Hello,

We take your comments into account and strive to continuously improve our data.
Kind regards,
The DB Team
Udarian (2025-09-23 13:32:58+00:00): the level something is on is better tagged using the level=*, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level
FrozenTomb (2025-09-23 15:34:22+00:00): There is no indication that this trail exist on the ground.
mapper3002282 (2025-09-25 04:09:56+00:00): Sorry about that I did it again after doing a survey and I also added the source as survey.
muralito (2025-09-24 14:23:24+00:00): Hola. Gracias por el aporte. Cuando agregues cosas nuevas no borres numeros de puerta, porque esos numeros de puerta estan todos en ese edificio. Lo que tenes que hacer es un nodo nuevo para el elemento que vas a agregar y listo.
MassCartog (2025-09-23 14:39:23+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. I don't know if this trail really exists on the ground or not, but I wanted to tell you your given reason for removing is not valid.

You have a new account and might not be aware, On OSM, we do not removed features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Even decommissioned trails that still exist should not be removed until they are gone. Removing them is actually considered vandalism.

So a trail not being "officially mapped" or "encouraged for use" has no barring on whether or not it should be in OSM. The only thing that matters is if it exists on the ground or not.

If the trail does exist the correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=no would be appropriate if they are closed the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

Read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
FrozenTomb (2025-09-23 14:59:36+00:00): When I was up there two days ago, there were no indications of this trail existed. It could perhaps be a winter route, but there is nothing in that pathway that I saw, except the sensitive vegetation that grows at 13,000' of elevation.
FrozenTomb (2025-09-23 15:01:43+00:00): If you look at satellite imagery for the area, there isn't anything on the ground there. 

39.0976946, -106.4328955

Here are the GPS coordinates.
MassCartog (2025-09-23 15:36:11+00:00): Thanks for the response! You are the mapper on the ground and I believe you if you say its not there. 

Your changeset description implied you were removing it because it was not official, not because it didn't exist. So I wanted to make you aware valid vs invalid reasons to remove OSM feature incase you didn't know. Better to let you know now then have your work reverted by someone else in the future due to a common misunderstanding.

Thanks for your work!
FrozenTomb (2025-09-23 15:42:53+00:00): I appreciate the clarification, and am currently trying to make the correction to another space that I made a similar edit on. There is a section of South Mount Elbert that has been removed and set for re-vegetation, but is still visible. I'll look around later today to see about reverting that change. 

The only thing I can think of is that the short cut being discussed in this comment went in during winter, as sometimes snow routes and summer routes can differ due to the ground protection that happens.
democat (2026-03-02 04:59:51+00:00): Hi there, these roads are not private access, as the public can drive along these roads at any hours of the day without restriction.
technician_lyft (2026-03-04 17:37:34+00:00): Hi democat,
I am Rostom, OSM mapping Lead at Lyft. Thank you for reaching out and going forward removing the private access. It looks like we wrongly evaluated the evidence that we have at the time resulting in the incorrect changeset. I apologies for that and thank you once again!
 
Best Regards,
Rostom
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-07 17:19:31+00:00): why use ref=SS1 ?
giulcenc (2025-11-08 12:10:45+00:00): L'intenzione era di indicare a quale strada appartiene il chilometraggio indicato, in questo caso la strada statale 1.
eggie (2025-09-23 14:37:20+00:00): Dag  BBourgondien,

Nu zijn op fietskaarten adressen niet meer te vinden om naar toe te navigeren. Wat is het probleem dat de straatnaam ook op het fietspad staat?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-23 14:39:14+00:00): Of kan als dit de Doetinchemseweg is niet beter dan die straatnaam toegevoegd worden.
Dan jad het fietspad gewoon de verkeerde naam.

Gr eggie
eggie (2025-09-23 14:41:52+00:00): Ik heb op het fietspad Doetinchemseweg toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
BBourgondien (2025-09-24 06:38:48+00:00): de bewoners Doetinchemseweg 89 gaven aan dat er verwarring was omtrent hun adres vandaar dat ik de straatnaam had verwijderd. Ik kan me wel vinden dat nu Doetinchemseweg is toegevoegd. gr BB
eggie (2025-09-24 06:43:35+00:00): Yep... Dat was inderdaad de verkeerde straatnaam.
Omdat fietskaarten niet over de hoofdrijbaan navigeren..maar wel over de fietspaden is toch een straatnaam nodig.
Mapse..
eggie
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-04 20:14:00+00:00): A few years ago, I had edited it in the same way as you have recorded, but one of the OSM users guided me to the rules regarding routes such as three main streets and one side street, which should be drawn as shown in the example. Also, in the case of side streets, we are allowed to record the actual land charges, so in a side street that is not built for a separate return route, we have to connect a side street to the intersection. Thank you for your efforts.

چند سال قبل من هم به همین شکل که شما ثبت کرده اید ویرایش کرده بودم اما یکی از کاربران قوانین osm را در مورد مسیرهای مثل این که سه خیابان اصلی و یک فرعی به هم میرسند مرا راهنمایی کرد که تقاطع باید مانند مثل رسم شود. ضمنا در مورد راه فرعی مانند مجاز به ثبت عوارض واقعی زمین هستیم پس در مسیر فرعی که برای رفت و برگشت مسیر جداگانه ساخته نشده مجبوریم یک راه فرعی را به تقاطع وصل کنیم. با تشکر از زحمات شما
aaronq227 (2026-02-06 15:32:23+00:00): Hi ChehrehBargi,
LakeManapouri is no longer on the team, so i will be responding on their behalf. I simply changed highway=secondary_links here to highway=secondary to continue the highway classification through the junction per OSM guidelines. I am not sure I am understanding what issue you are taking with the edit here, would you be able to clarify further or provide links to a policy you are referring to? Thank you!
ChehrehBargi (2026-02-06 17:50:23+00:00): As you can see, in three-way intersections, the connection point is triangular and can be selected as an X-degree link, depending on the case. I modified it. If there were 4 lanes here with separate return lanes, the previous drawing would be correct, but here there are 3 main roads and a two-way side road without a separate return lane.
aaronq227 (2026-02-06 22:35:55+00:00): Hi ChehrehBargi,
Thank you for clarifying and making updates to the area, I will defer to your edits.
dcapillae_buildings-import (2025-09-23 14:52:06+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Gracias por los cambios.

La etiqueta adecuada para un parque infantil es «leisure=playground» (corregido).

¿El nuevo parque infantil ocupa toda el área del antiguo edificio?

Atentamente,
Daniel Capilla
dcapillae (2025-09-24 10:58:51+00:00): Hola de nuevo.

He visitado la zona y mapeado el parque infantil de forma más aproximada. Aún no hay imágenes aéreas disponibles que permitan trazarlo con precisión.
eggie (2025-09-23 14:34:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
AndyB_66 (2025-09-23 17:44:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%B7%D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD
SpinOff (2025-11-11 17:46:24+00:00): Unclassified w tym miejscu? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1031143361/history

Wydaje się że sąsiednie unclassified powinny być wyróżnione względem tej drogi.
ilias_ (2025-09-23 14:55:31+00:00): Hi, even though that road is private, it still exists, so you can't remove it. Instead, add the tag access=private.
Amine SOUINIDA (2025-09-26 11:44:34+00:00): This is our land, and this small path used to lead to our house The house was demolished, and construction work on the railway has begun
ilias_ (2025-09-26 11:46:54+00:00): Alright
AndyB_66 (2025-09-23 17:45:10+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
BCNorwich (2025-09-23 15:43:39+00:00): House drawn as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.