piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-25 21:20:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, zastosuj kombinację addr:city + addr:street. Jeśli nie, przekaż nazwę miejscowości w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/343095512

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-25 21:20:32+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2741883838
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10124236275
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085903415
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361386842

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
conradoos (2023-03-05 16:15:04+00:00): Cześć, jak dodajesz parking rowerowy jako obszar (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149263711), to powinieneś usunąć parkingi rowerowe, oznaczone jako punkty (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8926933113 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8926933114) na obszarze tego parkingu. Bo stosujemy zasadę Jeden obiekt - jeden element: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Jeden_obiekt,_jeden_element_OSM. I na parking oznaczony jako obszar przenosisz łączną pojemność tych dwóch parkingów, oznaczonych jako punkty.
MxxCon (2023-02-26 01:16:29+00:00): Hello.
When mapping things please pay attention not to glue features together unless they are actually attached to each other. In this case you glued a swimming pool to a building..👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133022518
Glassman (2023-02-28 17:18:51+00:00): According to https://www.filcommsea.org/ this building hosts the Filipino Community Center. Can you help me better understand what needs fixing?
Mshuma (2023-02-28 18:19:57+00:00): Yes! The building is correct but this is the address that is associated with the filipino community center:
Filipino Community Center, Martin Luther King Junior Way South, NewHolly, Rainier Valley, Seattle, King County, Washington, 98118, United States

The issue here is that the Filipino Community Center is not in the NewHolly neighborhood. I am using OpenStreetMap for a project currently, and the above autocompleted address does not search unless NewHolly is deleted.

The address should be as follows:
Filipino Community Center, Martin Luther King Junior Way South, Rainier Valley, Seattle, King County, Washington, 98118, United States

This does not change the location of the filipino community center, but just deletes the "NewHolly" neighborhood from from the address.

Here is where I found the address with the error: https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/search.html?q=filipino+community+center
Glassman (2023-02-28 22:10:13+00:00): I haven't lived in Seattle for a few years now. But it looks like it should be in the Rainier Valley neighborhood. However Rainier Valley was entered as place=suburb. Since Seattle doesn't have suburbs as defined by OSM, you could change it to place=neighborhood. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/150959549#map=19/47.55254/-122.29089. Let me know if this seem right. If you do change it, it may take a couple of days before Nominatim catches up.
Polarbear (2024-07-19 15:55:57+00:00): Hi streckenkundler,
als du die Node eines Min-Roundabouts in 2023 gegen einen way junction=roundabout ausgetauscht hast, hattest du dir das mal vor Ort angeschaut?
Ich war gestern da und konnte keinerlei Beschilderung finden, also ist das eine normale Recht-vor-Links-Kreuzung (geworden?).
 
Lediglich die Pflasterung deutet darauf hin, dass es dort mal so beschildert gewesen sein könnte. Das sind aber alles Steine und kein Asphalt. 
 
Ich weiß nicht, ob es in den 370 Posts in der Diskussion, die du angegeben hast, auch um unbeschilderte Situationen ging? 
 
Ansonsten würde ich das mal anhand der Ortsbesichtigung umbauen. 
vg Polarbear
streckenkundler (2024-07-19 16:52:39+00:00): Hei,

Ich war da eine Weile nicht mehr. Baue um, wie du es für richtig hältst. Ich vermute eh, daß es bei diesen Mini-Roundabouts einige falsch-Positive gibt.

Sven
Polarbear (2024-07-19 20:25:04+00:00): Prima. Erledigt :-)
johsin18 (2023-03-01 19:31:44+00:00): Hi jcrm07, this supermarket was already present in the map (at a more precise location), so I have removed it again.
Frans S (2023-03-08 11:59:21+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133023109
Frans S (2023-03-08 12:00:27+00:00): HI. Back again.
Roads in this urban area can be tagged as residential.
Please read also the info about mapping/tagging tracks on the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133023109
DeFra85 (2025-07-17 21:43:01+00:00): Ahoi, die Rollenbezeichnung "part" für die einzelnen Etappen halte ich für äußerst fragwürdig, weil bei der Auswertung so etwas herauskommt: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=2717790&type=relation&map=11.0/51.431/9.4352

Auch steht die Rolle "part" nirgends im wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Wandern
Glassman (2023-02-28 17:22:35+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133023625
Enock4seth (2023-09-02 09:26:19+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contributions. Kindly use title case for names i.e. "Aboadze Clinic" instead of "ABOADZE CLINIC".
zaizone (2023-02-27 16:51:16+00:00): Merci pour la correction
Tjuro (2023-02-26 09:40:28+00:00): Hoi Dave040,

Zou je mogelijk iets meer zeggende changeset comments achter kunnen laten? Alle changesets zijn per definitie al updates.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Tjuro
marczoutendijk (2023-02-26 09:55:58+00:00): Don't use the name=* tag for the housenumber!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
josmougn (2023-03-31 12:30:09+00:00): bonjour
C'est inutile et redondant de mettre "addr:housenumber=" "addr:*=" dans les tags d'un magasin quand l'adresse est déjà dans osm et de plus dans cet exemple dans une relation de rue. Cela crée un doublon et augmente le risque d'erreurs (faute de frappe, rue mal orthographiée, mauvais nom de rue, etc).
Sur un magasin utiliser "contact:housenumber" "contact:*=" (ce qui était déjà fait ici).
Merci.
marczoutendijk (2023-02-26 09:56:30+00:00):     Don't use the name=* tag for the housenumber!
    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Waaslander (2023-02-26 09:40:53+00:00): Je hoeft in het Waasland niet al de gebouwen te karteren ze. Ik ben zelf bezig dat van uit het GRB te importeren. Beveren, Kruibeke, Zwijndrecht, L.O en Wachtebeke staan nog op mijn lijst. De rest is af met uitzondering van Sint-Gillis-Waas
Waaslander (2023-02-26 09:41:30+00:00): Ik apprecieer wel je ijverigheid :)
marczoutendijk (2023-02-26 09:57:02+00:00):     Don't use the name=* tag for the housenumber!
    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
SomeoneElse (2023-02-25 23:24:17+00:00): Also includes deleting duplicate York-Stamford Bridge railway line.
This had been deleted, restored, and then duplicated (but sometimes in the wrong place).  I'm pretty familiar with the route of this (it;s still very much there in the landscape).  The bits that aren't walkable paths are visible from adjacent roads and paths, and also from on-the-ground trees etc.
marczoutendijk (2023-02-26 09:58:13+00:00):     Don't use the name=* tag for the housenumber!
    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-27 08:17:29+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments.  What did you change/edit, and why?

Refer here for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133025248
SekeRob (2023-03-14 15:50:35+00:00): Ciao,

si prega di prestare attenzione durante la mappatura dei percorsi in cui sono già presenti edifici. Entrambi non possono trovarsi nello stesso luogo a meno che non vi siano passaggi edilizi censiti per i quali esistano opportune etichette che richiedano il taglio in sezioni dei percorsi.

buona mappatura

Hi,

please pay attention when mapping paths where there are already buildings. Both cannot be in the same place unless there are surveyed building passages for which there exist appropriate tags requiring the paths to be cut in sections where the buildings area.

happy mapping.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-25 23:40:22+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58359664
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58358985

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
himoury (2023-02-26 00:19:14+00:00): I made a mistake  overhere, must be reverted but don't know how?
ashs_as (2023-02-26 09:22:44+00:00): Hello himoury;
I Fixed this issue and made some classifications more suitable as it was.
Regards
ashs_as
jafarbeek (2023-02-26 03:39:23+00:00): You have changed state borders between Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan around the Andijan reservoir. The governments of both states ratified the border delimitation agreement with each other on the Andijan reservoir agreement. According to the delimitation, the reservoir is located in Uzbekistan's territory at 900 altitudes.   Can you explain this changeset?
NFZANMNIM (2023-02-26 03:56:06+00:00): oh you are correct. The border agreement was signed only last month. Sorry I did not know about this recent development. I will fix this issue and restore the old border
MxxCon (2023-02-26 01:22:12+00:00): Isn't Bar Chord something else now?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133025682
punkpenguinprincess333 (2023-02-26 23:07:12+00:00): Not yet! Nothing else has opened up yet
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133025682
marczoutendijk (2023-02-26 08:25:25+00:00): Hello Giforgi 3541 (and 3540, 3539, 3538,...).
Do you understand why meaningful changeset comments help other mappers?
No? Then you should read this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

Ciao Giforgi 3541 (e 3540, 3539, 3538,...).
Capisci perché i commenti significativi sui changeset aiutano gli altri mappatori?
No? Allora dovresti leggere questo:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Giovanni Forgione (2023-02-26 16:39:35+00:00): Grazie! Ho letto le note al link che mi hai mandato. Condivido quanto enunciato nelle note. Altre volte mi avevano consigliato di lasciare dei commenti ma pensavo si dovesse fare una relazione lunga che mi prendeva più tempo delle modifiche stesse. Ora ho capito che basta una riga che spiega ciò che ho modificato. In sintesi è solo il titolo della relazione che pensavo sbagliando. Grazie ancora per il tuo prezioso suggerimento.
marczoutendijk (2023-02-27 15:49:07+00:00): Thank you very much for adopting your comment style!
Grazie mille per aver adottato il tuo stile di commento!

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
user_3022894 (2023-04-02 17:59:38+00:00): Hi Micha,

wollte nur kurz nachfragen, ist die Benutzungspflicht der Radwege entlang der Böttingerstraße aufgehoben worden?

LG Lukas
michawtal (2023-04-02 20:01:36+00:00): Hi Lukas,

in Haan sind viele schlechte Fuß-Radwege nach dem Beschluß des Verkehrsentwicklungsplans VEP II vom Mai 2018 (IVP Runge) aufgehoben worden, u.a. in der Böttingerstraße. Einige Maßnahmen müssen noch umgesetzt werden.

VG Micha
user_3022894 (2023-04-04 17:22:22+00:00): Ah, verstehe.
Alles klar, super, danke für die schnelle Antwort! VG
marczoutendijk (2023-02-26 08:05:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6899
EvanSiroky (2023-03-01 06:12:52+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, California. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

The new driveway along with the gate you added looks great!

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap!
EvanSiroky (2023-03-01 06:13:41+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, California. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

The new house you added looks great!

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap!
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-27 08:02:15+00:00): Do not use names to describe what an object is, such as in:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149541525
EvanSiroky (2023-03-01 06:24:27+00:00): Hey there! I'm a local mapper from Scotts Valley, California. I see that you requested a review of this changeset, so I'm giving it a review.

It appears that you have added a new road on Treasure Island that is next to a road that is marked as being under construction. This new road is marked as being open to traffic. The new road is also marked as a more prominent classification than what the under-construction road was marked as.

I am not very familiar with this area and it appears to be undergoing construction so conditions may not appear like they are on satellite imagery. If you personally visited this area, it would be great to add a source to your changeset noting that you did a survey.

Given the proximity of this new road to the one marked as being under construction I kind of wonder if the road marked as under construction should just be converted to no longer being under construction if it has been constructed and is open.  The alignments could also be adjusted if needed.
pancakedrawer001 (2023-03-01 16:40:18+00:00): Thanks Evan! I went for a run in the area, so I ran on the new roads here. I have a Strava activity that shows the path I took on the new road: https://www.strava.com/activities/8620422695. 

That makes sense. I'll modify the existing road that's under construction and delete the new road that I'd made.
Eebie (2023-06-11 11:00:15+00:00): Uw toevoeging surface=paving_stones:30 geeft een foutmelding omdat het cijfer hier niet toegestaan. Gebruik de tag: paving_stones:length of paving_stones=0.3
dvdhoven (2023-06-11 12:28:45+00:00): Niet toegestaan is een veel te dikke term.
Iemand heeft zeer voorbarig de validatieregels van JOSM zitten aanpassen.
Maar dat wil nog niet zeggen, dat het niet is toegestaan.
Je kunt een validatieregel van JOSM gewoon negeren en zelfs aangeven dat je hem niet meer wilt zien.
En dit paving_stone gedoe is zeer onlangs geïntroduceerd, dus geen reden om oudere changesets te gaan becommentariëren.
Persoonlijk vind ik dat er eerst consensus moet zijn of we dit wel willen.
paving_stone:30 moet nl vervangen worden, hou je vast, door:
 surface=paving_stones + paving_stones:shape=square + paving_stones:length=30 cm.
Zie ook de wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones
waarin vermeld staat dat een aantal mappers het niet eens zijn met paving_stone:30 en zo'n mapper heeft zijn of haar zin doorgedrukt door de JOSM validatie aan te passen. Niet heel erg netjes, maar dat is al een aantal keren gebeurt.
Allroads (2023-06-12 12:59:49+00:00): Dit gebruik ik al jaren om tegels aan te geven, dat is vele jaren geleden al in de Nederlandse community besproken (forum). De tagvorm komt niet van mijn hand, overgenomen. Vooral nadat ik de style voor josm heb aangepast met een icoon voor tegels. Om surface uit te beelden.
Een verkorte vorm om tegels aan te geven.

Ik heb deze melding in JOSM uit gezet.

Wil je meer detail toevoegen, ga je gang.

Ik ben het eens met de dvdhoven toelichting.
limes11 (2023-03-20 20:50:20+00:00): Hi, 

du hast hier eine Menge zusätzlicher Radwege eingezeichnet, die an der Bundesstraße bereits mit cycleway=lane erfasst waren. Jetzt ist alles doppelt (und teilweise dreifach)

Gibt es hier räumliche Trennungen? Falls nicht, schlage ich vor, die ganzen extra-Wege wieder zu entfernen.

VG Limes
user_3022894 (2023-03-20 21:43:24+00:00): Hi Limes,

ohne überheblich sein zu wollen;

da kann ich definitiv nur beipflichten. Ich habe in https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/130999977 bereits versucht, den User zu kontaktieren, da es mit sidewalk=left/right/both an Straßen und den von ihm eingezeichneten separaten Bürgersteigen genau das selbe Problem gibt wie hier von dir geschildert. 

Zumal Streetview247s Tagging ohnehin sehr grob ist und diverse Beziehungen zwischen Ways nicht beachtet werden. Auch baulich ungetrennte Straßen werden einzeln je Fahrtrichtung eingezeichnet. Man versucht es ja, ihn zu kontaktieren, aber er macht einfach weiter.
limes11 (2023-03-20 23:16:41+00:00): Oh hatte seine vorherigen Änderungen nicht geprüft.

Er hat die Bundesstraße aufgetrennt, daher die falschen Namen und macht das wohl systematisch. Keine Antworten auf Changeset-Kommentare. Was für ein Chaos. 

Ich schaue mal, ob ich das hier revertiert bekomme...
jhonatabf (2023-03-12 20:47:31+00:00): Gostaria de entender o motivo da edição, já que ela não reflete como o entroncamento da BR-163 com a PR-239, de acesso a Quatro Pontes está no momento. O entroncamento está mapeado no formato antigo, que já anos não existe. O local está com um entroncamento temporário que deixou o transito um pouco confuso, e ainda deixar o mapeamento deste jeito, deixa mais confuso ainda para os aplicativos que utilizam o mapeamento.
Glassman (2023-02-28 17:29:41+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133027194
Glassman (2023-02-28 17:31:09+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good - just remember to square buildings to make them look better
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133027241
Bike-Walk Fayette (2025-02-16 00:57:31+00:00): values for bicycle, pedestrian, golf cart should be "yes"
justinbstrick (2025-02-17 20:42:05+00:00): This is not a city path.
Glassman (2023-02-28 17:30:40+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133027269
Glassman (2023-02-28 17:30:32+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133027285
aTarom (2023-02-26 19:17:46+00:00): Hi VARVAR8,
out of curiosity, are the start_date from Catastro?
when you can check this element
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149551868/history
Thanks for editing
VARVAR8 (2023-02-28 19:31:14+00:00): Can I find you in Telegram messenger "OSM España"? (https://t.me/OSMes)
It would be more convenient to exchange screenshots there.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-01 16:40:20+00:00): Hi,

This changeset introduced duplicates of several nodes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10694121311 duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10689773793
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10694121272 duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10689772743
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10694121990 duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10689771700

Could you please fix these? Thanks!
SherbetS (2023-03-07 22:07:45+00:00): done.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133421106
mf8s003j (2023-03-06 15:40:54+00:00): 👋 Hi there! I'm just curious about a maxspeed change you made. Is that section of Willson Place really signed as 30 km/h? I know that the City announced some changes just recently, but that seems like an unusual road to be slowed down permanently.
Johnwhelan (2023-03-04 23:54:49+00:00): You seem have to have uploaded 140 duplicate buildings.  Possibly you've uploaded the same data twice?  I'm quietly zapping them by the way.
MxxCon (2023-02-26 04:22:08+00:00): Let's keep it civil... :)
mariotomo (2023-02-26 08:55:22+00:00): hi. thanks for your contributions — in areas which are not of my concern ;-) please remember to close your changesets when you move focus to a different location.
(I would advise against creating one object in Bogotá and one in Mexico with a single changeset.)
zeltzinpalacios (2023-02-26 23:16:50+00:00): Hi. Thank you for your observation, i'm not sure how this happened. I believe I created the guest house yesterday and the goverment office a few months ago. I guess It has to do with Organic Maps. Any suggestions on how I can fix this?
eggie (2023-02-26 12:48:22+00:00): Dag Jeroen

name=....  zou je beter kunnen omzetten naar operator=.. en verder access=customers toevoegen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-27 07:50:46+00:00): Beste Jeroen   Wanneer je een bedrijf verdwijnt zal toch het oude adres intact moeten blijven. Je kunt beter de info kopieren naar de nieuwe adresnode.
Nu komt één adres 2x voor en het oude is verdwenen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-27 07:53:30+00:00): Oude adres hersteld
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-27 08:11:06+00:00): Please use more detailed changeset comments.  What did you change, and why?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133028447
mavl (2023-04-23 16:04:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:49:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:57:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:48:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].
mavl (2023-04-23 15:59:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135261135 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6928].