piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2026-01-16 07:29:10+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If you know the road is open for use, please change the tag to highway=residential and remove the construction tag.

Regards Bernard.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-02-26 11:15:12+00:00): Hello Beager. This edit has just been brought to our attention, with concern being raised by other mappers  concerning the sources you have quoted as using. As far as we can tell, those sources are not authorised for use in OSM due to the licence that they are published under? Have you arranged a waiver from Vicmap to allow us to use them? 
Thanks, 
Graeme Fitzpatrick, 
Moderator          		
OSMF Data Working Group
Beager (2026-02-26 20:22:17+00:00): Hi,
I had earlier understood "VicMap" did have a waiver per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources
I'm pretty careful with this, hence also always sourcing my edits. Now reading the details carefully including the waiver for 'VicMap', I can see that Vic Aerial is a seperate product. I think I had thought because aerial was available within VicMap it was captured through that.

For this particular edit I have been on the ground and physically saw this bench, see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Beager/traces/12159925

Hence my source of "survey", however I have had the background turned on from this earlier understanding.

Will swap to Bing understanding this is available.
aharvey (2026-02-26 23:32:01+00:00): It's okay, mistakes happen, but glad we caught this early.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Victoria specifically lists each Vicmap dataset that is available, which doesn't include the aerials. Though based on this, I think we better add it to that list as red to make it clear it's not compatible.

If we were able to use Vicmap Aerials, then we would have made them available by default in iD, JOSM, Vespucci.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-02-27 04:20:58+00:00): Thanks for the clarification!
jellybeanfish (2026-01-16 22:11:33+00:00): Correction: source used was Bing Aerial Imagery
BCNorwich (2026-01-16 07:41:39+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It's the offices of an online only business so not a shop. I've amended the tags.

Regards Bernard.
unni-geo (2026-01-17 11:10:13+00:00): Habe deinen Änderungssatz per https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177330906 zurückgesetzt.

Was wolltes du im Detail ändern?
Carto'Cité (2026-07-23 09:33:31+00:00): Bonjour.
Merci d'avoir réouvert l'accès nommé Rue Albert Peuvrier sur le quai Voie 1 bis. Il y avait avant les travaux 4 marchespour atteindre le quai : sais-tu si c'est toujours le cas ?
Antoine de Carto’Cité pour SNCF #Transilien
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-15 23:23:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 177253864, 177253958, 177253998, 177255131, 177256100, 177256135, 177256555, 177256619, 177256672, 177256708, 177256741, 177256794, 177256855, 177256890, 177256943, 177257039, 177257110, 177257222, 177257289, 177257375, 177257435, 177257469, 177257568, 177257686, 177257698, 177257750, 177257887, 177258270, 177258308, 177258335, 177258358, 177258511, 177258686, 177258882, 177258909, 177259104, 177259380, 177264880, 177275209, 177275259, 177275560, 177275590, 177276097, 177276174, 177276464, 177276516, 177276545, 177276569, 177276607, 177276624, 177276649, 177276680.
jellybeanfish (2026-01-16 22:07:01+00:00): Correction: source used was Bing Aerial Imagery
muralito (2026-01-16 00:00:41+00:00): Hi. There is a small problem that is (or can be) introduced when changing an element which is mapped as a node, and transform to an area, which is when some user in a mapping app ask to do to e.g. an hospital, when the POI is a node, that's ok, but when the POI is a area, you should also map entrances, so the app can find the right coordinates and route the user to the right place. In small places the problem is not much visible, but as the size of the POI gets bigger it becomes a problem.
muralito (2026-01-16 00:03:46+00:00): Another problem is that if you delete nodes the history of the data is not lost but preety much hard to find.

My advice to solve both problems, or at least what i try to do when editing in this kind of cases, is to put the old POI node as "entrance=main", and moving the rest of the data to the way.
Berdly (2026-01-16 19:52:18+00:00): Forgive me, I usually merge nodes with areas. I will say I have no way of finding out the entrance that is acceptable to use in OSM, though
jellybeanfish (2026-01-16 22:11:12+00:00): Correction: source used was Bing Aerial Imagery
Tomas Straupis (2026-01-16 06:53:36+00:00): Klausykit, taigi masiškai gadinate duomenis. Tai labai negerai.
Gazikas (2026-01-16 08:17:02+00:00): Gadinam kaip? Sužymėdami laukų ribas? Ir teisingus duomenis suvedant?
Tomas Straupis (2026-01-16 09:13:07+00:00): Čia suvedama ŽEMĖNAUDA, o ne konkretūs laukai, kurie keičiasi iš metų į metus ir kurių nerealu, kad kas nors masiškiau suvestų, o jie ir niekur nenaudojami. Taipogi suvedant dabar buvo sugadinti OSM objektai, taigi buvo neveikiantys duomenys. Jau nekalbant apie topologiją, kur pilna persidengimų, atplaišų ir pan.
Gazikas (2026-01-16 09:16:10+00:00): O tai ka man daryt jeigu man reikia lauku ribas susidet?
Tomas Straupis (2026-01-16 09:19:01+00:00): Tai lokaliai pas save turėti, o ne į viešą sistemą dėti :-) Pvz. pasiimti kokį QGIS Desktop (www.qgis.org) ir ten susibraižyti ir vėliau pagal poreikius naudoti savo laukus (ar bet kokius kitus objektus).
santamariense (2026-01-16 16:01:53+00:00): Caro Luciano,

Nâo sei qual foi o teu critério de edição, mas não está de acordo com a regra vigente https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil

Primary sao reservadas para a melhor rota a partir de cidade entre 20 mil a 200 mil habitantes até cidades de porte semelhante ou maior.

Bons mapeamentos.

santamariense
jellybeanfish (2026-01-16 22:10:30+00:00): Correction: source used was Bing Aerial Imagery
DwarfNebula_ (2026-01-16 00:44:36+00:00): Tijdelijk route, net als 6 en 7. Volgens u-ov site nog tot minimaal eind juni.
DwarfNebula_ (2026-01-16 00:44:41+00:00): Tijdelijk route, net als 6 en 7. Volgens u-ov site nog tot minimaal eind juni.
TheNightRider (2026-03-26 04:49:10+00:00): Hi KelsonV. I like that you mapped the Supercharger station as a way. Back when EV chargers were a pole or two, a node maybe made sense, but now we have stations that are acres in size. OSM isn't displaying them like parking lots, even though they are part of parking lots. All that's shown now is an icon.

Would you like if OSM (carto) showed the areas of charging stations similar to parking lots, maybe with a contrasting color? I'm going to promote this idea on the OSM forum and am looking for people who would back it.
TheNightRider (2026-03-26 04:52:22+00:00): BTW, I just added my usual Supercharger station tags for this station in Version #6. I only changed 1 you had already done: motorcar=yes to motorcar=designated
TheNightRider (2026-03-26 04:57:51+00:00): Oops, I also changed network=Tesla to network=Tesla Supercharger.
TheNightRider (2026-03-26 05:00:30+00:00): There's a branding problem with this stuff right now, and iD has been thinking it's a Tesla Destination Charger instead of a Tesla Supercharger. not:brand:wikidata=Q478214 seems to be the fix at the moment. It's worse with Supercharger for Business sites.
DetectiveConan (2026-05-03 16:00:26+00:00): Yangon boundary is not a foot route

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182167002
grzegorz75jan (2026-01-17 15:58:28+00:00): Z węzła który dodałeś można usunąć dane adresowe ponieważ obrys budynku ma już zawarte te same dane adresowe. Sam budynek można zmienić z building=yes na school. Możesz też włączyć warstwę obrysu budynków i poprawić obrys.

Co do samego Klubu to ... sam wybierz 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dmartial_arts
lub
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddojo
Optował bym za tą drugą opcją ze względu iż patrząc na Taginfo wydaje się mieć większą ilość użyć.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177279722
pitscheplatsch (2026-01-20 10:19:25+00:00): I guess something went wrong here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295393272/history/2
lampronessa (2026-01-16 18:12:34+00:00): Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery.
fluffycupcakes (2026-01-16 01:26:30+00:00): "Added parking spaces", not adjusted, sorry for typo
drewlevitt (2026-02-20 03:16:25+00:00): I would not represent the bike infrastructure on Camino Alto this way. From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway : "The cycleway=* tagging is used on linear features tagged with highway=* to map cycling infrastructure that is an inherent part of the road. This specifically applies to: cycle lanes which are part of the road without any physical separation from the other lanes except the painting on the road (don't map them as separate ways)..." And indeed, the bike lanes on Camino Alto are standard (class II) bike lanes separated from car lanes only by paint.
drewlevitt (2026-02-20 03:05:07+00:00): I think this changeset should be reverted, because bicycles are definitely permitted on Camino Alto. Did you mean instead to correct information on whether bike lanes are present on these ways? (They mostly are.)
drewlevitt (2026-02-20 03:18:42+00:00): I should note also that this change has made its way downstream into RideWithGPS and is currently making it impossible to correctly draw bike routes northbound over Camino Alto.
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-16 07:45:31+00:00): On the other side of the world
eggie (2026-01-16 08:50:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Zo te zien is de fietsoversteek bij kruising Asseltsestraat ook oneway=no
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-16 08:54:44+00:00): Denk toch niet...  vreemd dat de haaientanden wel op tweerichting wijzen, maar de verkeerslichten niet.
Lijkt me verder oke zo.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-01-16 08:56:56+00:00): Op één 'brug' stond nog oneway=yes Dat heb ik net aangepast.
Anonimal (2026-07-21 20:45:07+00:00): This is not a Flock camera. The brand is Genetec, if you look very closely at the silver sticker on the bottom of the camera, it has this brand label. I believe this camera is the "cloudrunner" and it is an ALPR used in conjunction with the Axon surveillance network used by the Schenectady Police Department.
i2004 (2026-01-16 10:30:58+00:00): cual es la parada inversa
AgusQui (2026-01-16 16:21:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3268341472
SomeoneElse (2026-01-16 12:45:41+00:00): Hello Mom Tomahawk and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Please do use better changeset comments than "Modified features".  
Instead, say what you modified and why, and what source you used.
fortera_au (2026-01-16 04:34:58+00:00): Hi, looks like there's a typo in the house number for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1467491633
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177281864
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:31:54+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13459508893 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Roofing company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:57:53+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177672926
(No visible changes after review)
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-23 23:14:30+00:00): Fixed numerous remaining tagging errors and issues, including adding a missing top-level tag, moving social media to contact: and moving alt_name=* to short_name=* and service=* to description=* in changeset 183086993

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183086993
mueschel (2026-01-20 11:46:24+00:00): Hi,
"survey:avg_speed:kmh" is not used in any other place.  
The tag "average_speed" is already rarely in use and could be used here as well.
bobthebuilder423468 (2026-03-25 15:13:54+00:00): my first edit!!!!!
nevw (2026-01-16 11:13:55+00:00): Hi, you have accidentally dragged some nodes to incorrect positions.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177283165
In the top right a tree has been dragged to a building and at the bottom more obvious shifts. 
When using iD you need to zoom in closely and be careful not to shift nodes accidentally. iD does have an undo button to use while editing and it’s needed often.
If you are unable to fix, comment here and I’ll fix tomorrow.
nevw (2026-01-17 09:20:20+00:00): I reverted this changeset because it is easier for you to add the business details again yourself being careful not to accidentally dragged other map nodes
mavl (2026-01-17 08:20:17+00:00): Здраствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет тег "addr:street=12-я Западная". В OpenStreetMap названия улиц указывают полностью вместе с родовыми словами (такими, как "улица", переулок", "тракт").
Ozon OSM12 (2026-01-17 19:08:58+00:00): Добрый вечер! Спасибо, что исправили. Буду внимательнее
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-01-16 05:45:12+00:00): Bổ sung: Tôi dùng hình ảnh vệ tinh của Esri vì nó cập nhật đúng và mới hình dạng của con đường sau khi cải tạo
eggie (2026-01-16 09:06:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Er is hier geen officiële parkeerplaats. acces=openbaara wordt niet begrepen door OSM.
Gebruik dan evt access=yes
capacity moet eenduidig zijn. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=177284267
Er zijn hier opritten daar kan niet geparkeerd worden.
Uiteraard staat het je vrij te parkeren, maar ik denk niet dat het officieel is toegestaan buiten de vakken. 

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
GlavkomLVO (2026-01-16 06:47:36+00:00): Để nhầm tên, nó nhảy chữ, sorry:))
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:31:57+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/4059312638 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Mobile auto repair service in Statesville North Carolina"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-25 08:57:54+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/177422047
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-19 04:12:53+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13459666324

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mueschel (2026-01-17 09:54:39+00:00): Hi,
please check your edits. It's "building", not "buildiing".
rempshaener (2026-01-16 19:48:06+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe folgende Anmerkungen:

1. landuse-Gebiete bekommen grundsätzlich keinen Namen. D. h. der müsste wieder raus.
2. Auch wenn die Luftbilder eventuell veraltet sind: sicher, dass das Wohnnutzungsgebiet bereits fertig ist? Üblich ist eher ein mehrjähriges „Anwachsen“ von landuse=construction zu landuse=residential.
3. Ich bin mir recht sicher, dass die ALKIS Daten aus Schleswig-Holstein nicht in OSM genutzt werden dürfen. D. h. wenn das deine einzige Quelle ist, würde ich dich bitten, die Daten wieder zu löschen. Auch wenn LBV_SH für das steht, was ich denke: das wäre grundsätzlich ein Problem.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
eggie (2026-01-16 09:11:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Beter niet schuiven met een bedrijf over een groot gebied. De procedure is .. haal de bedrijfsinfo van de oude adresnode af en vul deze weer aan op de nieuwe adresnode.
Nu is Transportweg 12 verdwenen als adres. Expeditieweg 6F verdwenen?
6A verdubbeld? 
Meester B.M. Teldersstraat 11 verdubbeld.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-01-16 09:17:53+00:00): Adressen hersteld
Senihtu (2026-01-28 18:58:30+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen in OSM!
Mit diesem Changeset hast Du den Straßennamen in Sofienstraße geändert.
Das ist Ok - kann man auch nachsehen, wenn man beim Bildmaterial ALKIS auswählt.
Allerdings tragen noch alle Häuser in der Straße einen Addressnode mit addr:street=Sophienstraße.
Das könntest Du auch noch ändern.
noch viel Freude beim mappen wünscht
Senihtu
cedar419 (2026-01-28 19:27:29+00:00): Hallo Senihtu,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich bin mal davon ausgegangen, dass wenn ich einen Straßennamen korrigiere, sich auch die einzelnen Adressen mit aktualisieren. Werde das dann gerne noch nachholen. ;-)
marc__marc (2026-01-16 08:39:37+00:00): erreur de source : c'est openstreetmap existing data
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-17 11:14:55+00:00): czemu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12724521541/history to place=quarter ?
johsin18 (2026-01-21 21:05:38+00:00): Also laut dieser Meldung sind Velos dort jetzt ganz verboten, und das wurde ja auch erst im Juli 2025 so eingetragen.
https://www.birsfelden.ch/de/aktuelles/meldungen/Fahrverbot-Marie-Lotz-Promenade.php
Mattia Pastore (2026-01-21 21:27:27+00:00): Stimmt. Sorry! Gerne ändern.
Discostu36 (2026-01-18 11:15:00+00:00): Nur weil es andernorts falsch gemacht wird, muss es hier nicht auch falsch gemacht werden. Das Feld name=* ist für Eigennamen, nicht für die Art des Denkmals, diese ist bereits mit memorial=ghost_bike erfasst.
Janesb (2026-01-18 21:54:18+00:00): Moin, mit dem ausgefüllten Namensfeld taucht die Bezeichnung auch in der Karte auf. Somit ist klar, um welches Denkmal es sich handelt, wenn mensch davor steht ohne in die Metadaten zu gucken.
Discostu36 (2026-01-19 06:41:38+00:00): Deine Motivation verstehe ich, aber es ist trotzdem falsch. Wir machen bei OSM nicht nur eine Karte, sondern vor allem eine Geodatenbank. Wenn in der Datenbank Objekte, die keinen Namen haben, einen bekommen, nur um ein bestimmtes Rendering zu erzwingen, sind das falsche Daten. 

Bitte lies einmal diese Artikel durch:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer

Um Ghost Bikes auf einen Blick erkennen zu können, gibt es Spezialkarten, wie z.B. diese hier: https://mapcomplete.org/ghostbikes.html
trial (2026-01-18 14:45:49+00:00): Bonjour, quelle source pour ces changements de nom ?
TotalEnergies c'est le nom sur le terrain.
Guidel Sud a sa place, mais c'est sur branch :
branch=Guidel Sud 
Tant qu'à faire mettre à jour :
website=https://locator.totalenergies.com/NF042589?type=FUELING&business_type=RETAIL
Et sur cette page on voit bien que l'aire est appelée Aire de Kerfleury, pas Guidel Sud. Si vous voulez ajouter alt_name=Guidel Sud, pourquoi pas.
trial (2026-01-18 14:48:36+00:00): De plus pour le 8 rue du Lavoir, vous avez créé un doublon.
IvanaŠokčević (2026-02-19 12:38:56+00:00): Reverted accidentally added node, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177967353 #OptimoRoute
Yepoleb (2026-01-18 04:41:31+00:00): Danke, dass du das alles erneut repariert hast
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-17 10:44:27+00:00): Convenience Store has the suspicious name "Мини Маркет"
rhhs (2026-01-17 11:06:02+00:00): iD gives that warning because in English, it's still descriptive. But I think in Bulgaria you can consider it a name. You could also consider tagging it with noname=yes if you think the sign on the shop is only a  description of the kind of shop, and inscription=Мини Маркет to show what's written on the sign
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-17 13:16:16+00:00): Inscription doesn't show up on apps, which most OSM users use
rhhs (2026-01-17 15:15:53+00:00): If it shows or doesn't show up on apps should never be a consideration when mapping, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer
Frans S (2026-01-16 10:37:53+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Accurately mapped. However, be sure all buildings are squared.
Best regards.
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-02-18 10:29:07+00:00): Moin Ropino,
auch hier hast Du einen Wald gelöscht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89456391
Bitte sei vorsichtiger bei Deinen Änderungen!
Gruß Roger Wilco
Ropino (2026-02-18 11:47:38+00:00): Hallo, 
danke für die Infos.
...wurde wieder hergestellt.
Für mich ist es selber nicht ganz klar, wann dies passiert. Ich bin ja eigentlich nur an den admin-Grenzen dran. 
Ich werde vor dem Hochladen genauer schauen...
VG
OSM_RogerWilco (2026-02-18 12:26:58+00:00): Danke!
yelisey90 (2026-01-16 10:45:18+00:00): partly reverted with respect to paths around Buchukuni fortress: no trodden or waymarked paths or footpaths exist there, only more or less passable forest (but not everywhere along this route)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177292719
Littlebtc (2026-01-16 10:08:22+00:00): ..縣道164調整至台17口，以西為新雲144
A67-A67 (2026-01-23 08:58:26+00:00): Graag geen access=no toevoegen aan wegen die niet voor iedereen verbosen zijn. De weg stond al als highway=pedestrian in OSM, dus niet toegankelijk voor motorvoertuigen. Toegang voor hulpdiensten kun je eventueel explicitiet aangeven met emergency=yes/no.
Remco G (2026-01-23 09:04:05+00:00): bedankt voor je feedback dan zal ik 
Emergency  No aangeven.
Zal dit ook aanpassen op de Catharijnesteeg
borovac (2026-01-16 11:27:15+00:00): Hi Dani,

According to the satellite image, the Rondo Kuning area appears to be a forest, with no administrative value.
Can you please check that relation again - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20102102
Thanks in advance Milan
Dani Safa Adi Nugraha (2026-01-29 16:46:59+00:00): Rondo Kuning is a village that was registered by Leiden University in 1933.
eggie (2026-01-16 11:14:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
André Dames (2026-01-16 11:23:07+00:00): Had ik gezien dank je wel :)
marc__marc (2026-01-26 19:27:12+00:00): Bonjour,
si tu veux renseigner le wall connector en lui meme je pense qu'il devrait etre man_made=charge_point et rajouter un socket:type2_cable sur la station elle-même
Pour le réseau, j'étais passé sur cet object pour mettre Tesla Superchargeur mais j'ignore que faire dans ce cas : mettre les 2 réseaux ?
Cordialement,
Marc
NikoJorj (2026-01-27 07:31:09+00:00): Oui, c'est ce que j'ai fait.
marc__marc (2026-01-27 12:05:39+00:00): je vois pourtant amenity=charging_station sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13460088698
ou alors on ne parle pas de la même chose :)
NikoJorj (2026-01-27 12:09:50+00:00): Oupse! merci de la relecture, c'est corrigé.
gmar5 (2026-01-16 11:40:12+00:00): Hi.

I think it is worth recording that with:
building=pub
building:use=house

Best wishes.
extua (2026-01-18 13:14:35+00:00): thanks for the suggestion! I've changed that here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177373047