piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2023-09-12 12:43:46+00:00): Lijkt me oke.. 
Beetje muggenzifterij...  
Hier een recente foto van een paar dagen geleden.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=12-09-2022&loc=50.89913%2C5.942008%2C19z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-09-09&acqid=20230909_103131_PNEO-03_1_9&sensor=Pleiades-NEO
Dan kun je je oprit denk ik aansluiten op die uitrit van de woonboulevard. 
Eigenlijk geen idee of je mag routeren over het verdrijvingsvlak. Er is wel een trucje op te verzinnen om dat te voorkomen met een afslagbeperking.
De verf op de weg zal wel door de praktijk zijn ingehaald.
eggie
eggie (2023-09-12 12:14:57+00:00): Dag atelier

Je oprijlaan komt van een fietspad af.  Klopt dart wel of hoort dat door te lopen tot de hoofdrijbaan?
MVG
eggie
ateliernoordzuid (2023-09-12 12:20:34+00:00): naar de hoofdrijbaan! Heb ik dat gemist?
ateliernoordzuid (2023-09-12 12:22:53+00:00): ja, ik zie het. Oei, maar goed dat er even iemand meekijkt
eggie (2023-09-12 12:34:38+00:00): Yep.. pas je het zelf aan?
eggie (2023-09-12 12:56:53+00:00): In ieder geval een afslagbeperking vanaf de woonboulevard aangebracht. Je mag daar vast niet linksaf slaan.
ateliernoordzuid (2023-09-12 13:11:19+00:00): het ziet er nu heel accuraat uit
eggie (2023-09-12 12:18:07+00:00): Het bosje even opgenomen in de multipolygoon. Stukken landuse en ook water gescheiden houden van elkaar. 
gr eggie
ateliernoordzuid (2023-09-12 12:22:22+00:00): check. dat klinkt logisch
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:35:12+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364542
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:35:05+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364541
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-24 04:50:35+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141666771
literan (2023-09-12 17:56:51+00:00): Вроде бы это аббревиатура. Не?
kate_rocketdata (2023-09-13 08:20:22+00:00): Да, спасибо за комментарий. Исправим на заглавные.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:34:57+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364540
osmviborg (2023-09-12 12:35:02+00:00): natural=gully
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:34:48+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364538
NorthCrab_upload (2023-09-12 12:20:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11176499553

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:34:39+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364537
tastrax (2023-09-13 08:19:15+00:00): Is part of the track one way? In that case it needs to be split.
MichS (2023-09-22 14:32:29+00:00): Hallo,

access=no schließt alle Verkerhrsteilnehmer aus. Die anderen Verbote sind überflüssig.

MFG

M
Frans S (2023-10-04 10:05:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please use the correct tags when you map roads.
The tag Track is not to be used where roads connect buildings, settlements, villages etc.
See these wiki pages
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Morocco#How_tagging_the_routes/ways?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries
Best regards
user_5359 (2023-09-12 19:39:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys).
gscholz (2023-09-13 06:59:53+00:00): Hi weltonp2,
this changeset has created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-69.93249&lat=-4.26539&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

This kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
frosm (2025-04-22 19:52:32+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207161829#map=19/43.025744/1.800275
je te conseilel de regarder l'imagerie sat et de charger la zone, cela aurait permis de mettre le cours d'eau dans son fossé au lieu d'aller à traver les routes et maison
xronos (2023-09-14 21:14:57+00:00): https://osmcha.org/changesets/141160999/
А можно поинтересоваться - какие проблемы навигации исправил mass deletion?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141160999
xronos (2023-09-14 23:03:28+00:00): почему удалил name:uk (https://osmcha.org/changesets/141160999/) ?
    way 261197677
    way 870971720

Это тож мешало навигации?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141160999
Константин Гам (2023-09-17 17:10:16+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Для начала поясните зачем вы мне "тыкаете", удалил ваш сын что-то или друг. Я не тот и не другой.

Удалены неактуальные обьекты. В чём проблема? Давайте устроим маппинг-прогулку и вы мне покажете пальцем на местности, где лишнее удалено. Я без проблем восстановлю.
Константин Гам (2023-09-17 18:17:41+00:00): C name:uk на объектах типа millitary ну как-то двояко...  я бы спросил мнение сообщества. Особенно после последних набегов не дружелюбных представителей соседей наших...


ПС и о какой навигации вы всё время спрашиваете? Пакет правок в целом был про обновление местности за последние 5 лет, я здесь бываю и хочу иметь актуальную карту.
xronos (2023-09-18 12:10:25+00:00): Дело в том, что формы глаголов во 2-м и 3-м лице в прошедшем времени совпадают (он ( т.е. "процесс of mass destruction" удалил) -- ты удалил). Заявляю, что с этого момента никогда не буду обращаться прямо, потому что не хочу умножать и так запредельную токсичность, только через форму "report this user" сразу в DWG, а там уже пусть решают что с этим делать.
clay_c (2023-09-23 17:40:00+00:00): These are not toll roads. Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141655087
tastrax (2023-09-13 08:17:53+00:00): If this is actually trafficable by vehicle then I think the more appropriate tagging is a Land Access Track. It also looks like some parts of this track are duplicated  with the Raptor Ridge track, plus there is a section of track in the south that very nearly crosses over itself. Is that actually the case?
tastrax (2023-09-13 08:48:35+00:00): Also, please add meaningful changeset comments. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
NetworkingTas (2023-09-13 10:16:50+00:00): Evening
Raptor ridge: the trail builders took it upon themselves unfortunately to prioritise there own agenda and push foliage and debris over existing trails.
It is taking a bit of work but we are getting it back to shared access in spots where it overlaps
tastrax (2023-09-13 11:51:57+00:00): Maybe grab some gps logs if possible (and upload them to OSM) and then cut and shut the tracks where they are combined. Cheers
Tomas_J (2023-09-27 21:14:41+00:00): Ahoj,
dakujem za upravu a zlepsenie mapy. 
Za mna iba mala pripomienka - lepsie je bod vybrat z cesty, posunut ho na ziadane miesto a potom do cesty znovu vlozit. Ty si povodny bod vymazal a vytvoril novy, cim sa zmazala aj jeho historia. Akekolvek otazky mozes pisat aj sem: https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk

Tomas_J
Filip009 (2023-09-28 13:33:03+00:00): (Neviem či je toto v iDeditore možné)

Ja by som mal skorej pripomienku k tomu, že cestu je potrebné v bode, kde sa nová značka nachádza rozdeliť a pridať/upraviť tag maxspeed pre časť mimo obce a pre časť v obci.
Acsko (2023-10-01 15:51:21+00:00): Ďakujem za usmernenia. Práve preto, že som nedokázal svoju myšlienku celkom presne vyznačiť, som ju popísal čo najpresnejšie, aby to skúsenejší užívatelia doladili. Ďakujem.
Tomas_J (2023-10-01 19:03:29+00:00): Upravil som max speed za znackou obce.
jleedev (2023-09-15 12:58:02+00:00): Reverted in 141302425
kidneyspr (2023-09-16 17:27:51+00:00): Acharya Parshu, you're not using "toll=yes" correctly in the changes you made in Puerto Rico. The purpose of "toll" is for whether or not you need to pay to use that section of the road.

I added "toll=no" tags because you don't need to pay to use those sections.  The "toll=no" tag also tells routing software that these sections can indeed be part of a route where the user wishes to avoid paying toll fees.

The "toll" values that were in place before were working as intended. Could you revert these changes?
clay_c (2023-09-23 17:40:02+00:00): These are not toll roads. Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141655087
Frans S (2023-09-16 14:34:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please map only the buildings when you see a yard with trucks on it,
Best regards
divulmappeur (2023-09-14 21:39:04+00:00): Merci pour cet ajout et votre souci du détail
clay_c (2023-09-23 15:59:10+00:00): These are not toll roads. Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141651266
yvecai (2023-09-13 16:13:40+00:00): ski=no, are you really, really sure? :-)
I think you can safely omit skiing restrictions when mapping in Togo.
jleedev (2023-09-15 12:59:25+00:00): Reverted in 141302478
embear (2024-05-29 16:12:47+00:00): Hallo, diese Woche war ich auf dem Albsteig unterwegs und habe festgestellt, dass dieser Wegabschnitt fertiggestellt und begehbar ist. Könnten sie bitte den Weg entsprechend in OSM freigeben?
Gonéo (2023-09-12 15:27:02+00:00): Le demi-chaucidou, je ne sais même pas s'il existe dans le code de la route mais il y en a plusieurs dans le secteur.

Le wiki propose  cycleway=lane + lanes=1 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Bandes_cyclables cas L3)

StreetComplete est plus précis avec cycleway:left=shared_lane et il ajoute même cycleway:left:lane=advisory
gileri (2023-09-12 20:52:31+00:00): D'accord avec toi Gonéo, encore mieux comme ça.
Frans S (2023-09-20 09:28:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
Please adjust the multi-layer buildings to their footprint after drawing the rooflines.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141162003
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-14 06:09:25+00:00): Why you added toll=yes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394501868 ? It seems to be a bridge over toll road?
Maneesh-Mahlawat (2023-09-15 05:44:26+00:00): Yes, it is a mistake that Ganesh Bhardwaj made. I talked to the user. Thank you for reverting this change
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-15 05:49:46+00:00): I reverted this edit now, it was not reverted before

Note, maybe some added toll=yes here were valid, in such case readding them makes sense

Also, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15036
gscholz (2023-09-14 07:02:09+00:00): Hi ProfEdsonSilva,
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-64.30952&lat=-8.85264&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Metzor (2023-09-12 16:59:51+00:00): Hi random tree

A (late) welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Please also habe a look at this page as you use StreetComplete:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#A_changeset_made_with_StreetComplete_covers_a_massive_area%2C_why_is_this%3F_How_can_it_be_prevented%3F
ffff23 (2023-09-12 12:49:42+00:00): source=survey
gurglypipe (2023-09-12 13:43:46+00:00): Heya, just checking: should https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24564297 be motor_vehicle=private instead of motor_vehicle=no? If not, it probably shouldn’t be tagged as a driveway. Ta :)
Roshmaps (2023-09-12 13:48:20+00:00): Well spotted gurgly ;)
gurglypipe (2023-09-12 13:57:50+00:00): haha :D

Thanks again for all your ongoing changes and attention to detail :)
Roshmaps (2023-09-12 14:06:35+00:00): And thanks to you for helping us in the process :)
Poretsew (2024-07-15 16:22:33+00:00): Hoi multimodaal,
ik zie dat je https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495210661 voor het laatst hebt bewerkt in deze set. Vanmiddag heb ik hier gewandeld en het viel me op dat er een apart mtb-spoor langs het pad loopt, in het noordwestelijke deel. Dat is (nog) niet op de kaart te zien. Ik vind het altijd wel handig om te zien waar die mtb-sporen lopen, dus als je dat kunt toevoegen, graag. Ik twijfel trouwens of het hele pad (behalve waar de mtb-route parallel loopt) niet een mtb-spoor is. In mijn beleving is het overal een smal zandpaadje met bandensporen.
Groet, 
Jelle
multimodaal (2024-07-15 21:31:09+00:00): Hoi Jelle, goed dat je even contact opneemt. De laatste keert dat ik het heb gefotografeerd leek het maar een enkel (gedeeld) spoor te zijn, maar dat is al weer 4,5 jaar geleden, zie de link hieronder. 
Het kan goed dat het in de tussentijd gescheiden is, heb ik elders ook zien gebeuren. 
Hoop hier binnenkort weer eens te kunnen fietsen en dan zal ik ernaar kijken. Als jij in de tussentijd het mtb-spoor apart kan/wil intekenen, dan is dat natuurlijk ook prima!
Groeten (-: 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1170664626770111
eggie (2023-09-13 06:15:16+00:00): Dag Schakkebroek.. Je vraagt feedback.. Zou de hoofdtag er toch niet 'bijmoeten'? 
man_made=street_cabinet
Nu zie ik alleen de specificatie. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstreet_cabinet
MVG
eggie
user_18267930 (2023-09-12 17:30:46+00:00): So other people's surveys all need resurveys but most of your armchairmapping doubtful tracks, far from your local area, don't? Because you're the almighty?
SomeoneElse (2023-09-14 21:44:49+00:00): Hello SHARCRASH,
Why have you added a fixme back to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893417283/history ?  You added it 2 years ago, someone doubted its existence 6 months ago, someone else confirmed its non-existence 21 days and you've just added the fixme back again?
You have to learn to trust other mappers.  Not every former path needs to be preserved as "abandoned:highway=path" - sometimes they really just aren't there any more.
Best Regards,
Andy
SHARCRASH (2023-09-16 12:22:10+00:00): First things first, how come you keep blindly demanding explanations in my change sets whereas I haven't done anything bad but you don't even contact a vandal making unobjective deletions on existing elements? 

I found out also interesting the fact you treat unfairly other contributors, like Mariotomo who cares about quality, confirmed by several other contributors here https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/andy-townsend-acaba-de-enviarme-un-bloqueo/92565/3 
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mariotomo/diary/396109#comments 
Or even though a contributor is acting awkwardly, you don't insult with "arsehole", like you did here https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-edits-in-italy/97706/48 
And as several people pointed out, the DWG lacks transparency. Clearly your moderation lacks consistency, it doesn't seem following a honourable code of conduct and you really like taking advantage of the privileged position you have. It's really disreputable for your image and the DWG!

About this CS, I'm going to teach your SomethingElse, just like the other time you didn't know about the tag "created by Reverter". Nature lives, it changes, there are multiple factors why a trail might not be anymore usable or even just not easily visible (in this case "trail_visibility" should rather be applied): dead leaves on the ground, overgrown vegetation (some high grasses disappear depending on season though) or in the opposite someone will decide to resurrect it, and a faint trail in nature is subjective...
I have the right to add a fixme=resurvey, just for myself. I do trust the contributor though since I did not reactivate it. As for the reasons for life-cycling an element, see OSM's Wiki.
SomeoneElse (2023-09-16 12:42:07+00:00): Re "how come you keep blindly demanding explanations in my change sets" then the reason is because the DWG is getting continual complaints.  I'm not in Luxemburg and can't judge how much merit they have or not; that's way it'd be great to have photo evidence of some of these (and thanks for providing that in the past).
user_18267930 (2023-09-18 14:57:08+00:00): The problem you, SHARCRASH, like to ignore is that you add tons of ways that haven't been usable in years, if they even ever existed. You see something on Lidar, a line on Strava heatmap, nomatter how light, nomatter how little you know the area and automatically assume there is a way. That's your algorithm, all of it. Plus you also think you're so good, you can guess tracktypes without aerial imagery.

How do you explain these survey results? (leave our MVP kewl out of this)

880160792

834287755

770918917

866450950

1012829772
SomeoneElse (2023-09-21 09:18:28+00:00): Again, I'd suggest to both sides of this argument that a discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org (with photos attached!) would be far more productive than tit for tat complaints to the DWG.
Frans S (2023-09-16 13:29:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please tag buildings as building=yes. This is the common tag for HOTOSM mappings.
please map courtyard as well.
This is how to map building with courtyards
 1   Draw the outer outline of the building as an area. Tag as a building
 2  Draw each of the inner courtyards/plazas as areas. Tag as needed, or not at all
 3  Hold 'SHIFT' and select all the areas
 4  Press 'C' to create a multipolygon with all the areas

Best regards and keep mapping
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-02-22 02:10:08+00:00): você não deveria ter mudado esta via para track: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/410607600 voltei para unclassified
clay_c (2023-09-23 16:01:20+00:00): These are not toll roads. Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141651400
Frans S (2023-09-19 12:12:55+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapping them as 1 building.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into the mapping.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141163492
Frans S (2023-09-19 12:13:06+00:00): Hello again.  FYI
Where clearly visible, add courtyards please.
This is how to map a building with courtyards.

 1   Draw the outer outline of the building as an area. Tag as a building
 2  Draw each of the inner courtyards/plazas as areas. Tag as needed, or not at all
 3  Hold 'SHIFT' and select all the areas
 4  Press 'C' to create a multipolygon with all the areas
 Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141163492
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:34:31+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364534
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:34:28+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364533
maro21 (2023-09-12 18:50:22+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:34:22+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364531
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:34:16+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364526
YomanNH (2023-09-13 08:00:25+00:00): Droga jest przejezdna dla mieszkańców, więc powinno być construction=minor i niezmieniona wartość highway, zamiast highway=construction, które wprowadziłeś. Dodałem brakujące oznaczenie drogi jako jednokierunkowej i access=private.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141195401
Tomek | Yanosik (2023-09-13 08:56:18+00:00): Ok, dzięki!
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:34:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364525
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:34:04+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364522
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:33:58+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364520
IMAN SELEMAN (2023-09-12 13:31:18+00:00): Edits by SELEMAN IMAN RWEYEMAMU
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:33:52+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364518
Kalepom (2023-09-27 07:53:46+00:00): Bonjour Sofy,
Il n'est pas nécessaire d'ajouter un chemin distinct pour les bandes cyclables, l'information est déjà présente sur la voie principale (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66848943) avec le tag cycleway=lane. Tu trouveras la documentation sur le wiki.
De manière générale, on évite également de même deux lignes l'une par dessus l'autre, ainsi que de mettre un nom descriptif (ici "Bandes cyclables").
N'hésite pas à venir en discuter sur le forum si tu as des questions :) https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:33:45+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364517
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:33:38+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364515
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:33:34+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364514
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:33:26+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364510
map per (2023-09-16 08:07:43+00:00): Hallo Oursencarte,

danke für die Änderung, aber du hast hier auch noch eine Bank am Bodensee verschoben (vgl. (1)). Hab das wieder rückgängig gemacht.

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#141164338
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:33:19+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364509
Fizzie-DWG (2023-09-17 03:33:15+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141364508
Frans S (2023-09-20 08:31:14+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks has been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers  high quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)

A: E: Inaccurate mapped and / or not squared.
D: Connecting nodes of buildings to other buildings or features like roads and residential areas.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141164642