piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2024-01-29 10:56:11+00:00): Hi,
"shop:ethnicity" is not yet used anywhere else. 
The origin of products can be tagged using the 'origin' tag, for foods in supermarkets 'cuisine' can be used.
while the ethnicity of the owner is usually private data that should not be in OSM.
b-unicycling (2024-01-29 12:25:04+00:00): I wouldn't know the ethnicity of the shop owner, but it's a Polish shop. I don't know if that means all the products are from Poland.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-23 22:07:59+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146610172
Peter Elderson (2024-03-15 13:15:29+00:00): Beste Flakkeeënaar, ik weet het, ik ken het zelf niet van survey, maar nu staat heel Hompelvoet er als wetland op. Zelfs de vijvers zijn nu wetland! 
Uit de beschrijvingen en beelden van het gebied die op internet te vinden zijn, krijg ik toch een ander beeld, namelijk dat het steeds droger wordt, dat er toenemend duinbegroeiing is, steeds meer bomen/bossen, dat er weides zijn waar vee op graast, dat er met machines gemaaid en gesnoeid wordt, dat de natte delen ook verdrogen en verbossen, etc. 
Ik meende dat ook uit de luchtbeelden te kunnen zien.

Ik geloof zonder meer dat het af en toe veel natter is met verzadigde bodem. Ik liep enige maanden geleden door Limburg en Noord-Brabant, en daar was het land op grote delen volledig verzadigd, elk buitje maakte er een waterzee van, maar in minder extreme omstandigheden is het redelijk droog dus dan wordt het geen wetland!
Nakaner-repair (2024-01-23 13:34:44+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 146582501, 146582693.
NeisBot (2024-01-27 11:04:06+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146700996
NeisBot (2024-01-27 11:04:21+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146700996
Patchanka (2024-01-26 08:51:22+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue
OpenStreetMap n'a pas pour objet de faire des cartes personnalisées. Les infos "test à louer etc" n'ont pas leur place dans OSM. On peut y ajouter seulement des éléments qui existent sur le terrain et pas de publicité.
Je vais annuler l'ajout que vous avez fait.
Si vous ne connaissez pas, je peux vous suggérer Umap qui permet de placer des points sur une carte en y indiquant ce qu'on veut
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/fr/
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-23 14:22:08+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Przy Szlaku Papieskim":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11543200106
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11543200125

"Osiedle Kubackówka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11543200204
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11543200205

"Kasprowicza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11543200351

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
G_P_J (2024-01-23 14:30:03+00:00): Poprawione.
Dimitar155 (2024-01-24 12:42:56+00:00): Мерси за поправката! Точно онзи ден се чудих защо съм сложил това тире. На техния сайт също е една дума без тире, така че направо го промених в NSI.
tux67 (2024-01-24 07:42:10+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Reaktion .. aber steht da wirklich vor Ort ein Schild auf dem "RWE Werksstraße" steht? Wenn nein ist das kein Fall für's name tag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht,_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben%E2%86%99
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146594992
tosm31 (2024-01-25 16:29:00+00:00): Ich hab‘s gerade anhand meiner Fotos überprüft. Da steht tatsächlich ein solches Schild (mit Zusatz „Eingeschränkter Winterdienst“).
tux67 (2024-01-25 16:31:44+00:00): Ok, cool. . Danke
DurgeshSinghChouhan (2024-01-23 22:12:20+00:00): Hi, you can label this road either private/permissive. This road is looking like in-hospital road.
mueschel (2024-01-29 10:59:25+00:00): Hi,
many areas you imported contain foreign tags that shouldn't be in OSM and need to be replaced, e.g.

    NIVEL_I = Áreas Antrópicas Não Agrícolas
    NIVEL_II = Área Urbanizada
    NIVEL_III = Edificações e sistema viário, metrópoles, cidades, vilas, áreas de rodovias, serviços e transporte, energia, comunicações e terrenos associados
    codIBGE = 4128633
    codigo = 12
    fid = 192181
    nome = Doutor Ulysses

Please have a look at these.
Strubbl (2024-01-23 18:24:29+00:00): Hi L-Klitschi, warum ziehst du die Daten vom Node auf das Gebäude um ohne einen Mehrwert? Damit geht die gesamte Historie des Nodes verloren. Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik%E2%86%99

Viele Grüße
L-Klitschi (2024-01-25 20:51:18+00:00): Moin, Danke Dir für Dein Hinweis, das war mir so noch garnicht bewüsst.
Werde schauen, das in der Zukunft zu berücksichtigen.
Vg L-Klitschi
Strubbl (2024-01-25 21:07:02+00:00): Vielen Dank, viele Grüße & viel Spaß beim Mappen
Vinber-Pro (2024-01-23 15:31:12+00:00): merci pour la correction
Camle-Pro (2024-01-23 15:32:55+00:00): Avec plaisir
joost schouppe (2024-06-12 16:01:03+00:00): It's a little weird to see a bar within a school :)
Is the school wrong? And if it's what we call a jeugdhuis in Dutch (I suppose a "club des jeunes", a more appropriate tag is likely amenity=community_centre
+ community_centre:for=juvenile
PhilippeWaty (2024-06-13 07:28:41+00:00): I change it to club.
It was referenced as bar in google
joost schouppe (2024-06-15 08:26:27+00:00): Thanks!
(I hope you're not implying you copied from Google Maps, as that could breach copyright)
Bauer33333 (2024-02-24 22:59:56+00:00): The relation was probably meant as a hiking route: https://www.outdooractive.com/en/route/hiking-route/southwest-ireland/knockaphuca-loop-walk/803837815/
Would be nice if you could check that and add it (back) on the full loop
grelus (2024-01-28 11:18:42+00:00): reverting wrong modified bicycle route relation based on old data and not field verified

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146774309
arte2002 (2024-01-30 22:57:58+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar
Pero es mejor poner el restaurante en un nodo, imagino que el edificio es de viviendas y una parte para el restaurante, entonces en mejor poner el restaurante en un nodo.

Seguramente por error cambiaste la Calle Horno Amorosas a andén de ferrocarril (modifico la calle).
Dodko (2024-01-23 20:39:29+00:00): Adresa už existuje na budove https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164481129 nedáva sa duplicitne aj do POI bodu.

Otvárací čas som opravil, chýbala bodkočiarka medzi dňami.

Skontrolujte správnosť umiestnenia či je to v budove gymnázia Hviezdoslavova 10 alebo má byť vedľa Hviezdoslavova 11.
VictorIE (2024-05-17 13:36:01+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6196929753
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7896387812
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7932560833

How do toilets:wheelchair=yes and wheelchair=limited apply to a street cabinet?
wheelmap_visitor (2024-06-04 10:04:42+00:00): Thanks for reporting this! For artworks in general, it usually makes sense to tag wheelchair accessibility – for example in museums, or for statues where you have to climb steps to read their signs. For street cabinets, there _could_ be cases where this makes sense as well, but in most cases not really – we could put ban the man_made=street_cabinet tag on Wheelmap. I've created a ticket for this internally.

Sebastian (Wheelmap team)
tux67 (2024-01-26 08:54:37+00:00): Von den insgesamt 3 hinzugefügten access Variationen war nur eine notwendig und korrekt:motor_vehicle=destination
https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=260,1020-30
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=326553593653223
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146597043
tosm31 (2024-01-26 20:22:16+00:00): Wir sprachen drüber ;-) Danke!
eggie (2024-01-23 15:30:18+00:00): Dag magaret  Je vraagt feedback

Wellicht maxweight=
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweight

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-23 15:32:25+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast
tux67 (2024-01-24 08:10:41+00:00): Hi,
das sind wohl diese beiden hier:
http://www.limburg-bernd.de/Kirchen%20und%20Kapellen%20im%20Kreis%20Heinsberg/Kreuzbilder%20Erkelenz/Oberwestrich,%20Ehem.%20Grabsteine.htm
Würde ich vorschlagen mit etwas Kontext in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ahistoric%3Dwayside_cross umzutaggen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146597310
tosm31 (2024-01-25 16:44:36+00:00): Korrigiert, Danke!
Xvtn (2024-01-24 16:19:51+00:00): Hi! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes here. Everything looks good to me, no complaints!
Thanks for your contribution!
grelus (2024-01-28 11:15:20+00:00): reverting wrong modified bicycle route relation based on old data and not field verified

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146774199
rskedgell (2024-01-23 17:13:03+00:00): Please could you supply a more coherent explanation for this reversion than "erróneo"?

There are no comments on the original changeset and nothing to suggest in any way that the original mapper's sources were not as described.

¿Podría darnos una explicación más coherente para esta reversión que "erróneo"?

No hay comentarios sobre el conjunto de cambios original y nada que sugiera de ninguna manera que las fuentes del mapeador original no fueran como se describen.

(traducción a través de Google, disculpas por cualquier error)
rskedgell (2024-01-23 21:04:40+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146608359 in order to restore the data before geofabrik.de extracts are generated.

#DWG
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2024-01-24 12:16:03+00:00): This reversal carried out by me is apparently an error in the OSM-Revert application, the change that was sought to be reverted was 146597776 in Madrid, Spain, where a beginner user erroneously deformed a roundabout. I really don't know why this change has been reversed.
Cebderby (2024-01-24 15:44:02+00:00): It looks like *way* 109208134 was part of that roundabout badly damaged by node drags, and that is the number of this changeset.  
But also way 109208132 was the same, and your changeset 146597431 has reverted changeset 109208132 (just set/removed fee=no on some parking in Germany) so that should be reversed too, probably the only other affected?
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2024-01-25 22:32:04+00:00): Probably, my apologies for the confusion.
Metzor (2024-01-24 07:21:33+00:00): Hi tmz,

Why did you remove
   boundary = administrative
From a relation in Canada while editing in Japan?

See: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/4263150

Best regards and happy mapping
Metzor
tmz19890431 (2024-01-24 10:24:28+00:00): Hi Metzor,
I'm sorry to cause trouble.
I unintentionally took erroeous edit when I watched there for reference at edit mode. If I want only to see other areas, I close edit mode.

I don't know how to restore the object. Please operate it on my behaif if you'd like.
Metzor (2024-01-24 10:40:37+00:00): Hi tmz,

Thanks for your answer. This can happen, but can also be fixed again :-)

Please fix as follows:

1. Open this link referring to the relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4263150

2. Switch to edit mode (you might need to zoom in)

3. Add field, enter "boundary"

4. Set the value to "administrative"

You can check with the link in my first comment of you were successful (may take some minutes).

Thanks for fixing and happy mapping
Metzor
tmz19890431 (2024-01-24 15:36:33+00:00): Hi Metzor,

Thank you very much!
I could fix the type of boundary.
I'll take care of my mapping activitis.

tmz
NeisBot (2024-01-27 10:59:55+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM.
Your changes look very strange and sometimes don't make sense.
Are these automated, and are you trying to test something?
NeisBot (2024-01-27 10:59:40+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM.
Your changes look very strange and sometimes don't make sense.
Are these automated, and are you trying to test something?
maro21 (2024-02-10 16:51:01+00:00): Ta edycja na jakiej podstawie?
pavvv (2024-02-10 17:02:29+00:00): głównie chodzi o dodanie 372 do old_ref, dyskusja o usunięciu ref jest pod poprzednią edycją
maro21 (2024-02-10 19:25:17+00:00): Aha, tutaj https://osm.org/changeset/146059606. Nie widziałem tej dyskusji. Ok.
tux67 (2024-01-24 08:14:12+00:00): hier auch traffic sign als node
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146598385
tosm31 (2024-01-25 16:47:18+00:00): Erledigt!
tux67 (2024-01-24 08:12:28+00:00): Sorry - aber das traffic sign sollte als node auf oder neben dem Weg an die Stelle wo es steht:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:traffic%20sign?uselang=de#Als_Knoten
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146598476
tosm31 (2024-01-25 16:46:10+00:00): Erledigt!
Cebderby (2024-01-24 09:55:36+00:00): Hi vw999 and welcome to OSM.
I've undone this change as the road already had oneway:psv=no (psv is bus and taxi) as well as oneway:bicycle=no to go with oneway=yes (for everyone else) and other tags relevant to this.  Also you dragged a railway node - which is rather easy to do if you move the map in iD while editting (if the cursor is not the 'open hand' shape when you drag the map, it means something is under there and may be shifted).  There were also 2 node drags in your other edit which are repaired (and the speed limit you added there is kept, thanks for that).
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-23 22:08:00+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146610172
tux67 (2024-01-24 07:48:52+00:00): Du hattest ein review requested .. das tagging ist so ok, netter wäre natürlich noch zu wissen, ob da ein Schild steht mit Bezug zu alten Ort etc.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146599809
tosm31 (2024-01-25 16:30:03+00:00): Das ist dort noch alles im Aufbau, ein Infoschild oder Derartiges ist leider nicht zu finden.
tux67 (2024-01-24 07:55:56+00:00): Hallo tosm31,
bitte nicht die gesamten (dem highway type ohnehin immanenten) access möglichkeiten zusätzlich mappen. Das machen wir nur, wenn da ein explizites Schild vor Ort zu sehen ist.
(also kein snowboard, inline_skate, ski, moonlander, etc = yes ;-) )
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erfasse_keine_Vorschriften,_die_nicht_durch_Gegenst%C3%A4nde_vor_Ort_repr%C3%A4sentiert_werden%E2%86%99
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146599949
tosm31 (2024-01-25 16:35:07+00:00): Aber wenn einmal ein Pferd auf Skiern …??? ;-) Ist korrigiert und ich bin für die Zukunft informiert. (Hatte pflichtbewusst das ausgefüllt, was JOSM zum Ausfüllen angeboten hatte.)
tux67 (2024-01-25 19:24:39+00:00): Ja, die Templates (auch bei iD) erwecken den Eindruck alles auszufüllen wäre das Ziel 😉
eggie (2024-01-23 17:55:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedbackk  Met motor_vehicle=designated zet je het open voor regulier verkeer. Dat zal vast niet de bedoeling zijn. 
De Molendijk staat ook al open met motor_vehicle=designated. Dat kan onmogelijk kloppen.
We zou je emergency=yes kunnen bijtaggen.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-01-23 18:05:29+00:00): svp access=no niet gaan toevoegen aan wegen icm met foot=yes . Dat is bijna altijd fout. 
Ik heb motor_vehicle designated verwijderd van het marktplein en van de Molendijk.
emergency=yes toegevoegd.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-23 18:30:12+00:00): Probeer even overleg te plegen met VR mapper  C Batenburg om op één lijn te komen.
Vragen staat altijd vrij.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146423744
NorthCrab_upload (2024-01-23 16:50:23+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242264714

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Szymon Król (2024-01-24 12:26:08+00:00): Dodałem nazwę "Chyliczkowska" drodze, która łączy budynki 20B-F z jej "głównym" przebiegiem oraz zmieniłem addr:city na addr:place zgodnie z uwagą.

Pozdrawiam!
eggie (2024-01-23 18:07:21+00:00): Het is weer aangepast...  Dit soort tagging verstoord de routering. 

Vraag evt eerst hulp via het forum aan ervaren mappers.
Wellicht heb je hier iets aan.
 

Veiligheidsdiensten  

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Hulpdiensten 

 MVG
eggie
Taxichauffeur (2024-03-01 10:19:30+00:00): 90km per uur ipv 100km per uur Flitsmeister staat nog op 100km per uur en word veel geflitst
grelus (2024-01-28 10:58:01+00:00): wrong modified bicycle route relation based on old data and not field verified

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146773700
mcliquid (2024-01-24 10:17:29+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
eggie (2024-01-23 18:51:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Dit kijkt me niet correct.  Wanneer een bedrijf verhuist heeft het geen zin om hier een adres te veranderen.
Je zult op het oude adres de bedrijfsinfo moeten verwijderen en op de nieuwe locatie de bedrijfsinfo moeten bijtaggen op de adresnode. Ik draai dit even terug.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-01-23 18:53:27+00:00): reverted by changeset #146604569
eggie (2024-01-23 18:56:56+00:00): Bedrijf verwijderd.. Even het nieuwe adres opzoeken en daarop bijtaggen
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=146601104
martinst (2024-01-23 19:32:44+00:00): Bitte aussagekräftige Changeset-Kommentare verwenden, siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Xvtn (2024-04-04 15:30:42+00:00): Hmm, something seems wrong here. Is this a public park or just a general green area at these apartments? Are the buildings really contained within the official park boundary?
blackboxlogic (2024-01-31 18:46:21+00:00): I see you've changed the shape of a town boundary. Since the legal town lines haven't moved, these town lines are now in the wrong place. Please stop changing the shape of towns.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146601410
eggie (2024-01-23 18:12:31+00:00): Het is al een pedestrian..  Daar is foot=yes default.

Er staat een bord voetgangerszone.
access=no kun je bv gebruiken voor een militair terrein. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-01-23 18:14:16+00:00): Wel kun je de breedte opgeven zodat LiveNav wel of niet routering mogelijk maakt voor een blusvoertuig. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width
Kevinneeleman (2024-01-23 21:40:43+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

bedankt voor je feedback. Ik heb de breedte nu aangepast.
gurglypipe (2024-01-23 20:12:25+00:00): What was the intention of this edit? The church isn’t that shape (unless they’ve built an extension recently?).

Please leave a more descriptive changeset comment than ‘.’ to help others understand what you’ve changed and why.

There’s some guidance about it here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Ta
John Embrey (2024-01-23 20:23:06+00:00): I did not change the shape of that building; at least not intentionally. I have amended it again to how I think it was before.
gurglypipe (2024-01-23 20:26:49+00:00): Thanks for your prompt reply. I guess this is a case of an accidentally dragged node then. Thanks for fixing it.

There’s a ‘Highlight Changes’ tickbox in the ‘Map Data’ panel on the right which can be useful in double-checking what changes you’re about to submit before you save a changeset.

Have a good evening :)
user_14547832 (2024-01-23 22:18:02+00:00): A Lyft fanboy is trying to take over Landing at Creekside using Service Roads?
ratrun (2024-01-24 17:03:35+00:00): I didn't check the history who created the duplicated service roads. Instead of creating additional duplicated ways the correct method would have been to verify that the already mapped highway=construction ways and change these into highway=residential in case that the construction work is over. But as I do not have any information about which of those ways are now finished I decided to remove all the superflous ways instead and wait for a local mapper to make these changes after  verification.
iandees (2024-01-23 19:04:38+00:00): Please write a more detailed description of the changes you make when you're saving your changes. It makes it easier to review changes over time.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146602459
charmaine_dalisay (2024-01-23 17:52:36+00:00): To the person who originally created this way, I am so sorry I did not mean to delete some of the tags you had. I'll do my best to put them back in. Sorry again!
opendcc (2024-01-23 19:45:56+00:00): Wie ist der Name des Supermarktes?
bxl-forever (2024-01-24 02:06:59+00:00): Hello, Tommy3009,

Here is a comment about your changes on OSM.  I will comment on this changeset but I found the same problem several times.

Adding [1] and [2] to indicate the travel direction is not a good thing.  Some users are patiently correcting mistakes from the past, bus please do not make the problem worse and don’t add new bad apples to the jar.

Especially not if your personal way to type names is "70 [2[ Nivelles - Rosseignies - Buzet".

The standard modern way is:
name="Bus 70: Nivelles → Buzet"
It is gradually being deployed all over the country, it’s nice if you can help too.

I hope you might find this useful.
Tom Desoutter (2024-01-24 20:05:53+00:00): Okay okay, sorry, i'm going to correct that. (I continue in french because my english is bad). J'avais fait cela ainsi en m'inspirant de ce qui avait été fait pour la ligne 82 par un autre utilisateur, j'avais donc continuer ainsi. Je vais vérifier et faire le nécessaire pour corriger tout cela.
opendcc (2024-01-23 19:28:43+00:00): Meldung an DWG ist erfolgt.
Abijan (2025-12-30 14:35:37+00:00): dag wegspotter, ben je zeker dat dit pad bestaat? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1242290612
mcliquid (2024-01-24 10:17:20+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-04 08:32:14+00:00): Before making further edits on OSM, you shoudl review the following:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

You made a couple mistakes which I have kindly resolved here:
1) You didn't add the beiges for the cartpath over the water.  you just left it as disconnected.
2) You should not name features like tees or fairways.  The name=* tag is not used for these features and should be left blank.
3) You partially overlapped landcovers.  Areas should not partially overlap.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146603640