piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cronoser (2026-03-12 15:22:46+00:00): corregida etiqueta
eggie (2025-12-16 15:31:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-12-16 15:47:30+00:00): Hoi Sarys..
Kun je hier met organic maps de adresnode selecteren en dan de info toevoegen. Ik heb geen idee of dat kan. 

Gr eggie
eggie (2025-12-16 16:27:34+00:00): Info samengevoegd
Sarys (2025-12-16 18:51:52+00:00): Hoi eggie,

Ik heb zojuist de postcode aangepast maar heb verder geen aanvullingen. Is deze nu in orde?

Mvg,
Sara
eggie (2025-12-16 18:54:48+00:00): Het klopt zo.
mueschel (2025-12-20 09:26:45+00:00): Stimmt hier "parking:right:psv:conditional" wirklich? 'psv' schließt Taxis mit ein, die damit rund um die Uhr dort parken dürfen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102612746
fmc_Mlvln (2026-01-02 17:42:00+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Habe ich geändert.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176754245
LG Mlvln/fmc_3
bartgron (2025-12-16 22:06:09+00:00): Nazwa została poprawiona - w OSM nie piszemy nazw samymi wielkimi literami.
Pozdrawiam
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-18 04:22:21+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459076051

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
iandees (2025-12-16 16:27:20+00:00): Hello! Thanks for updating the map data. Note that whether or not a map dot appears depends on which provider produces the map you're looking at. OpenStreetMap doesn't control that. If you provide the URL for the map you're looking at, I can help point you in the right direction.
muralito (2025-12-17 00:20:46+00:00): Hi. I disagree with mapping this historic site as power plant as it hasn't produced electricity in more than 100 years. IMO it should be mapped as historic site only.
user_5359 (2025-12-17 07:46:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice for a valid address you need addr:housenumber and addr:street.
JeroenHoek (2025-12-16 19:42:09+00:00): Als je van een track een service maakt, dan moet je tracktype vervangen door surface. Dus tracktype=grade1 (of grade2) wordt dan surface=paved, grade3 en hoger wordt surface=unpaved of surface=grass.

Die tracktype hoort alleen bij highway=track namelijk.
JeroenHoek (2025-12-16 19:43:10+00:00): Bijvoorbeeld: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/952082146
HJGroenVRFR (2025-12-17 11:20:42+00:00): klopt helemaal was ik even te snel met aanpassen van de weg naar toegangsweg dan neemt die alles niet over pas het aan
Higashimado (2025-12-17 01:19:01+00:00): 朋友您好，感谢您的贡献，只是关于 place 节点的值标注，目前的社区共识是行政村、自然村标为 village、自然村标为 hamlet，城市内的社区标为 quater，街道标为 suburb，希望您能稍稍留意

如果我没记错的话，此事在群里是有和您讨论过的？如果您对上述标准有所疑虑，可以使用 overpass 工具确认下其在中国大陆的通用情况

谢谢！
AAA-Batterij (2025-12-16 15:57:49+00:00): En kaartautomaat toegevoegd.
SpinOff (2025-12-17 22:39:06+00:00): Witam nowego mapowicza! Poprawiłem kategorię tej drogi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459083250/history

W edytorze iD, "droga lokalna" ma tag highway=unclassified. Jest to zbyt wysoka kategoria dla drogi dojazdowej. Więcej informacji znajdziesz na wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce
krawieck (2025-12-18 09:58:37+00:00): Dzięki za pomoc! :)
JakovBušić (2025-12-18 19:26:02+00:00): Wrong hgv restriction that was made in this changeset was corrected in 176110212
ianlopez1115 (2025-12-16 16:31:54+00:00): Large changeset box due to accidentally created node; was partially reverted in changeset 176013855 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176013855).
JakovBušić (2025-12-18 19:28:44+00:00): Wrong restriction accidentally made in this changeset was fixed in changeset 176110390 . #OptimoRoute
Barashnev (2026-02-24 02:00:31+00:00): This camera is not present.  I drove past there today and it's not there.  This appears to be an accidental duplicate of the camera a couple hundred yards east.
JakovBušić (2025-12-18 19:30:49+00:00): Wrong hgv restriction accidentally made in this changeset was fixed in changeset 176110466. #OptimoRoute
AnteŽunić (2025-12-17 12:51:06+00:00): Some tags that were in conflict with posted signs have been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176049241
NeisBot (2025-12-16 18:22:01+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

Problematic elements (top 3 by category):
https://osm.org/way/220649059 v26 | 9 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=176013479
pitscheplatsch (2025-12-17 20:25:40+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176058904
martien-176 (2025-12-16 20:12:46+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Most buildings have square corners because that's easy to build. Unless the building is clearly a different shape then it's best to assume that the corners should be squared. In the iD Editor, use the `Q` key to square the corners. 

Please check out these sources for more info: 
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT global validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176013519
Simon Sustrans (2025-12-16 16:26:38+00:00): Sorry that should read "Extension to NCN626".
Kovoschiz (2025-12-17 11:29:35+00:00): This one is debatable, as proper names for hangars would be "Hanger 12" etc. The "Former" on the sign also suggests it's a descriptive label, ie it can be "Old Royal Air Force Hangar" and "舊皇家空軍飛機庫" hypothetically.
user_5359 (2025-12-17 07:40:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. 
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
Glassman (2025-12-16 19:18:20+00:00): Typically when a gate is on a road, the blocked section is tagged as access=private, unless the gate is typically left open.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176013922
AdvJ (2025-12-16 19:43:58+00:00): Thank you for the feedback. To make sure I understand correctly, you mean I would split the road segment so that I can mark a portion of it private?
Glassman (2025-12-16 19:58:58+00:00): Exactly. That way routers won't try to take people via a block route.
NeisBot (2025-12-16 16:46:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (4 changesets) shows that 315 of your last 339 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23497545
serock (2025-12-18 02:29:07+00:00): Hola Rdeipenau, le envié mensaje por privado y ahora por acá, usted hizo una eliminación masiva de calles y que otros usuarios tuvieron que revertir sus cambios, le vuelvo a decir lo mismo que en el mensaje anterior, antes de borrar, debe estar 100 % seguro de que la calle, el nodo, o cualquier objeto "NO" existe más, antes de borrarlo.
Quizás, en vez de borrar, debería modificar.

Recuerde que ya fue "Baneado" y lo pueden volver a repetir.

Si tiene una duda o consulta, puede visitar la wiki Argentina: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina
O ponerse en contacto con el grupo de Argentina: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto

No dude en consultar, saludos !!!
LABEL17 (2025-12-16 17:29:36+00:00): Guten Abend @captain_slow und danke. Sehe ich das richtig, dass wir (LABEL17) nicht mehr an der Brotgasse erscheinen und stattdessen korrekterweise an der Seefeldstrasse 7? Dann bitte noch an der Storchengasse 19 in 8001 den Christmas Pop-Up erfassen, das schaff ich auch nicht, leider....
captain_slow (2025-12-16 17:43:58+00:00): Ja das ist richtig, der LAden erscheint jetzt nur noch an der Seefeldstrasse.

In OpenStreetMap werden grundsätzlich nur längerfristige Sachen eingetragen. Kurze, temporäre Dinge wie Popup-Stores, welche nur wenige Wochen offen haben, werden in der Regel nicht erfasst, da solche Daten dann auch ständig nachgepflegt werden müssten. Laut eurer Weseite ist dieser Store nur von November bis Dezember, also noch rund zwei Wochen. Daher würde ich davon absehen, dies einzutragen.
captain_slow (2025-12-16 17:45:11+00:00): Kleiner Nachtrag zu temporären Features: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
NeisBot (2025-12-16 18:27:14+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Barbershop and salon in Lebanon IN"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-18 09:54:29+00:00): 🔄 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the original contributor or remaining promotional text in description tags by https://osm.org/changeset/176086478
eggie (2025-12-16 16:57:18+00:00): Dag Gjalt...   In OSM Nederland hebben we al adfesnodes. Het is niet correct nogmaals een adres toe te voegen aan de gebouwomtrek.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-12-16 17:03:30+00:00): reverted by changeset #176015289 

Svp niets aan gebouwen verananderen. Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je dit doorgeven aan het Kadaster.
Alle gebouwen zij import vanuit het Kadaster (BAG)

Ik zal je ook nog onze welkomstmail sturen per PB.
MVG
eggie
Gjalt-Jorn Peters (2025-12-16 17:15:10+00:00): Oh, sorry!!! En dankjwel voor de correcties!!!

Heel interessant, want het kadaster heeft dus een deel van ons huis als het pand van de buren geregistreerd staan. Ik zal het aan hen doorgeven dan!

Wel heel mooi dat dat een automatische import is 🤩

En nogmaals mijn excuses voor het extra werk dat je hierdoor had!!! 🙇
eggie (2025-12-16 17:20:04+00:00): Nou   .. zoals het was klopte het ook niet.

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=op+de+was+3&objectId=0935200000064325&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=178736.55399102782&geometry.y=316535.2169170274&zoomlevel=15

Maar volgens mij heeft het Kadaster het al gecorrigeerd en is het nu correct.
eggie (2025-12-16 17:22:58+00:00): Ik heb het gecorrigeerd. Pand nr 3 klopt nu. Ik heb het uitgelijnd mbv de BAG en BGT

Groet,
eggie
eggie (2025-12-16 17:27:32+00:00): Even CTRL-F5 een paar keer. Dan zie je effect. Cache leeg maken.
Gjalt-Jorn Peters (2025-12-16 17:31:45+00:00): Oh, super dankjewel!!! Blij dat dit toch uiteindelijk nog tot een correctie heeft geleid 🙂 Heel erg bedankt voor het checken en alsnog doorvoeren! 🙏
NeisBot (2025-12-16 18:27:15+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Hair salon in Webster"

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-18 09:53:58+00:00): ❌ Fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/176036570
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-24 14:25:50+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184526951

https://osm.org/changeset/184526951
NeisBot (2025-12-16 18:27:16+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Guesthouse in Fuvahmulah"

#MapWithoutSpam #Comment #Description
NeisReview (2025-12-18 09:53:21+00:00): 👍 Thank you for updating the element https://osm.org/changeset/176019635
eggie (2025-12-16 17:01:37+00:00): reverted by changeset #176015245
eggie (2025-12-16 17:00:52+00:00): reverted by changeset #176015211
eggie (2025-12-16 17:09:21+00:00): De gebouwen heb ik weer uitgelijnd met de BAG (BGT)
Met een schuingenomen luchtfoto is dat niet echt mogelijk. Je had van het pand een multipolygoon gemaakt.
Dat heb ik hersteld. 
MVG
eggie
ptaff (2025-12-16 21:20:38+00:00): Please follow the standard where the school name is attached to the school grounds, not the school building: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176024158
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-18 04:22:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11920064123

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-18 04:22:33+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573468957

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-18 04:22:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600770598

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2025-12-17 07:37:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. 
If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org.
And please move the address to the main building!
gscscnd (2025-12-23 20:13:14+00:00): Wydaje się zbędne.
Baloo Uriza (2025-12-16 22:25:19+00:00): What's this mounted on?  Looks like it got added in the dead center of an intersection.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176016091
AndyB_66 (2025-12-16 17:39:05+00:00): Wydanie ZnRID to nie rozpoczęcie budowy - wykonawca nie wszedł jeszcze na plac budowy i żadne prace w terenie się nie zaczęły.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176016956
FroschForscher (2025-12-30 15:13:27+00:00): Hallo Beckasteigle,
du hast in diesem Änderungssatz `note=broken / kaputt Sept 2021` von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8088468080 entfernt und einige Details ergänzt aber abandoned=yes gelassen. In welchem Zustand befindet sich die Bank? Kann abandoned=yes entfernt werden?

FroschForscher
silversurfer83 (2025-12-16 19:25:42+00:00): Hi :)

bei den Öffnungszeiten bitte die englischen Tagesabkürzungen verwenden. Siehe

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Bei Fragen immer raus damit

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176016136
ptaff (2025-12-16 21:30:07+00:00): Please note that names are not for descriptions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Reverting “name=Patinoire” on ice rink.
JezCrow (2025-12-30 00:50:54+00:00): Good to see you making use of the clear Mapbox Satellite imagery (remember to offset it though - I've used -3.05, -1.64 around here), however I don't think it's worth the effort mapping temporary things like moveable trampolines in back gardens - e.g. the one at way/1459102400 is no longer visible on the newer Esri World imagery.
JezCrow (2025-12-30 00:54:30+00:00): The same for way/1459102401 and way/1459102402
SamuraiArmada (2026-03-16 20:54:03+00:00): Thanks for the feedback JezCrow! I'll take your advice into consideration!
amosharper (2025-12-16 23:58:32+00:00): Thanks for catching this, should have double-checked it when making my changes earlier.
rohieb (2025-12-19 01:44:49+00:00): Falls https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1410001243 nur eine einzelne Halle ist, wäre building=sports_hall besser geeignet als building=sports_centre.
sinusnombre (2025-12-19 06:23:12+00:00): danke für den hinweis; das ist halt eine der limitationen von streetcomplete
rohieb (2025-12-19 07:41:45+00:00): ah verstehe
eggie (2025-12-16 19:55:56+00:00): Dag bkleipool,

Lastig om feedback te geven.
'k Neem aan dat je ter plaatse bekend bent en de wiki hebt gehanteerd.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aeroways

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aeroways

MVG
eggie
bkleipool (2025-12-16 21:34:15+00:00): Hi eggie,
Ik ben inderdaad bekend met de apparatuur van het vliegveld en heb mn best gedaan het conform de wiki te doen. Maar omdat ik vrij nieuw ben bij OSM wou ik toch even kijken of ik het wel goed had gedaan.
AndreaDp271 (2025-12-16 23:32:17+00:00): brifge?
AndreaDp271 (2025-12-16 23:34:50+00:00): why 176017403 not more a path??
AndreaDp271 (2025-12-16 23:36:29+00:00): 1272431845 its only for pedestrian
AndreaDp271 (2025-12-16 23:50:06+00:00): 1382016928 why no markings?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176017403
AndreaDp271 (2025-12-16 23:52:41+00:00): 1459105433 like 176017403 is a path, no sign saying its only footway
AndreaDp271 (2025-12-17 00:00:43+00:00): 1272431847 and 1272431846 are not path but foot-cycleway, why you edited like path? it was mapped as foot-cycleway with iD standard
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway=cycleway

highway=cycleway
foot=designated
segregated=no
voschix (2025-12-17 09:41:42+00:00): typo "brifge" corrected. Thanks for spotting this

way 176017403 is in Poland ???

way 1272431845: I added bicycle=permissive as it is wide enough for bicyles, and is a safer option for cyclists. It's also in continuation from a signed segregetated foot-cycle-way to the West

way 1382016928: by convention, the markings seem to be usually mapped only on the crossing node, but not on the crossing way.

1459105433 like 176017403 (I suppose you mean way 1459105433): 
This looks like a footpath, so it as a fottpath. If your prefer path, no problem. Important that the information like surface, smothness, width is present. In this specific cse the verrtical signin is most likely wrong: coming from the South, there is a sign that motor vehicles to destination. I presume this applies only to the southern, paved part of the way. The northern part is only compaced, and certanly not intened for for motorbikes.

1272431847 and 1272431846:
when adding/updating additional tags like oneway, segregated, and width I used JOSM and it's presets replaced "cycleway" with "path".  In this case path and cycleway are equivalent. BTW this is not the case for not-segregated foot-cycle-ways in ITALY, which are legally  "marciapiedi" on which bicycles are tolerated, but pedestrians have priority, and their use is not compulsary for cyclists (if they run parallel to roadways). therefore I woul say it's better not to use the tag highway=cycleway, but highway=path or even highway=footway.

Thanks anyway for checking.
AndreaDp271 (2025-12-17 10:38:45+00:00): "way/1272431845: I added bicycle=permissive as it is wide enough for bicyles, and is a safer option for cyclists. It's also in continuation from a signed segregetated foot-cycle-way to the West"

I understand your choice, but I don’t agree. Together with the local FIAB, we decided not to add bicycle=permissive on wide sidewalks because it creates confusion both for people cycling and when visualizing the cycle infrastructure of our city, making it harder to understand where bike facilities are missing.



way/1382016928: by convention, the markings seem to be usually mapped only on the crossing node, but not on the crossing way.

This doesn’t make sense to me at all: by tagging the data only on the node, you don’t make the information available to those who actually use the crossing, but only to those who, while traveling along the main road, encounter the crossing.


1459105433 like 176017403 (I suppose you mean way/1459105433):
This looks like a footpath, so it as a fottpath. If your prefer path, no problem. Important that the information like surface, smothness, width is present. In this specific cse the verrtical signin is most likely wrong: coming from the South, there is a sign that motor vehicles to destination. I presume this applies only to the southern, paved part of the way. The northern part is only compaced, and certanly not intened for for motorbikes.

The first section of the road from the south is only for those who need to get there, up to the bollard. (By law, the sign prohibits motor vehicles, meaning three-wheeled motorcycles or quadricycles.) At the end of the path, there is no signage. Therefore, making it pedestrian-only is incorrect.

These sections are shared cycle-pedestrian paths, according to the horizontal and vertical signage recently installed by the municipality. As a iD mapper, I would tag them as:
highway=cycleway
foot=designated
segregated=yes

Just as I had mapped them before and in accordance with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway=cycleway
NorthCrab_upload (2025-12-18 04:22:49+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459106358

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Littlebtc (2026-01-14 10:30:13+00:00): Unfortunately this changeset create a 200 meter offset on De'An 6th Street; as it seems to be done accidentally, I fixed that htps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177213761