piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2025-02-05 14:03:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
ilias_ (2025-01-03 15:29:06+00:00): Hi there, why are you changing so many muslim mosque's religion from "muslim" to "islamic"? Did you take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:religion before making all of your changes? The correct values are buddhist, christian, jewish, *muslim*... not "islamic". Please revert your changes.
Colbertson (2025-01-04 12:23:07+00:00): I changed it from 'islam' to 'islamic'
It has ~197 uses, yes 'muslim' is probably more correct but atleast now its all the same without variations like 'Islam' 'ISLAM' 'Islamic' and so on.
ilias_ (2025-01-04 12:54:53+00:00): Why not change it directly to muslim which is the correct value in the first place then?
Colbertson (2025-01-04 13:41:26+00:00): because i was unsure and changing 20 values was less scary than changing almost 200
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:49:48+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164660065
vogelfreier (2025-01-12 17:06:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96830731/history -> Dach building=roof mit height=4 wie soll das gehen???
koepikai (2025-01-12 17:46:16+00:00): Warum kann.ein Dach keine 4m hoch sein?
vogelfreier (2025-01-13 15:55:21+00:00): Weil Du height so benutzt, als ob vom Boden aus bis zur obersten Kante es insgesamt 4 Meter sind (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:height), mit anderen Worten das Dach kann nur 10cm (?!) hoch sein.
3./4. Dimensionen Erfassung ist komplex (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Simple_3D_Buildings)
Ich benutze den JOSM https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ mit dem Zusatz "3D/Simple buildings outline..."
Wenn ich von Esner zu Esner Dir diese f4map nahe bringen darf, siehst Du das andere und ich schon einiges eingetragen haben https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.4544344&lon=7.0209538&zoom=16&camera.theta=71.643&camera.phi=-11.746 oder hier noch zum selber auswählen von verschiedenen Auswertungen https://www.osmgo.org/map/?go=1&
Gruß Rüdiger
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 02:10:10+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165051276
Frans S (2025-01-06 13:53:33+00:00): Hello Nico.
Please add a 'ford' tag where a highway crosses a waterway.
Since most highways are unpaved, pleas add a tag surface=unpaved to the highways.
btw. very precise mapped
Best regards
NicoDeRooij (2025-01-07 16:51:56+00:00): Thanks for your feedback Frans. From now on I will mark water-highway crossings as 'ford'and define all roads as unpaved.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:02:41+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094884
syzuub (2026-05-14 23:25:13+00:00): Moin,
ist der Name "Condor Flim" für die hier hinzugefügten Container richtig? Wirkt irgendwie unverständlich und seltsam.
ulrichg (2026-05-15 05:56:42+00:00): Moin, was ist daran unverständlich und seltsam? Die Firma Condor Flim GmbH ist der Sicherheitsdienst am Flughafen Braunschweig-Wolfsburg. Diese Firma sitzt in dem Bürocontainer am KFZ Tor. Was wäre denn Deiner Meinung nach eine bessere Beschreibung?
syzuub (2026-05-15 20:15:25+00:00): Die Ergänzung GmbH hätte meine Verwunderung wohl schon gelöst. Ich habe die Container zu building=guardhouse geändert. Da die Firma laut Handelsregister CONDOR FLIM - Gesellschaft für Flughafen-, Logistik- und Infrastrukturmanagement mbH heißt und ihren Sitz beim Terminal hat, habe ich den Namen hier entfernt und den Firmennamen als Operator eingetragen.
Dimitar155 (2025-01-05 19:48:46+00:00): Благодаря за промяната! Минах през промените и добавих възли за кварталите, които нямаха възли.
d3mol3k (2025-01-19 13:13:52+00:00): przystanki nie mają w nazwie "nż" to informacja z rozkładów jazdy gdzie wszystkie sa dla linii nocnych na żądanie - oficjalne nazwy przystanków mają tylko nazwy własne - Basen Górniczy (60551)
a nie Basen Górniczy nż
mavl (2025-02-05 14:03:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 162167075 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: wrong values for name:en - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161608012].
Thwade (2025-01-03 20:33:52+00:00): powód?
pavvv (2025-01-03 20:39:08+00:00): Ta nazwa jest poprawna. Relacja samej Polski jest osobną relacją. Nazwa, która obecnie wyświetla się nad Polską jest wynikiem wandalizmu, który już został wycofany. Rendering powinien jutro wrócić do normy.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 04:54:43+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164660151
bkabf271 (2025-01-03 15:34:27+00:00): 안녕하세요. 오픈스트리트맵에 오신 것을 환영합니다.
다름이 아니라 2005년에 이설된 옛 경부선 철도는 지금은 침목과 노반이 지상에서 완전히 없어져 더이상 보이지 않습니다. 이러한 경우에는 지도에 그리지 않고 삭제해야 합니다. 노반이나 침목의 흔적이 남아있을 때만 지도에 나올수 있습니다. 이러한 철도는 openhistoricmap에서 편집해야 합니다.
bkabf271 (2025-01-03 15:35:35+00:00): https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/
여기서는 이미 없어진 철도나 역등을 편집할 수 있는 사이트입니다.(openhistoricalmap)
bkabf271 (2025-01-03 15:36:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_railways
여기를 참조하시기 바랍니다.
Tommybara (2025-01-04 00:28:07+00:00): Chào bạn! Khi sửa đổi bạn vui lòng cung cấp một tóm tắt sửa đổi mô tả sơ lược những gì bạn đã sửa chứ không nên để "....." như ở trên đây. Cảm ơn bạn!
Lezurex (2025-01-04 11:12:03+00:00): Hallo Fijord,

Swisscom verkauft nicht nur Smartphones, sondern auch Internet und TV für zu Hause, warum also von telecommunication auf mobile_phone ändern?

LG Lezurex
Fijord (2025-01-24 14:32:59+00:00): Hallo Lezurex, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Weil es das Hauptgeschäft ist, habe ich es geändert. In dem Fall müsst der Sunrise Shop auch geändert werden. Gruss Fijord
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/926918980
Hufkratzer (2025-01-04 18:08:52+00:00): Hi,
You have retagged the buildings https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291647969 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291648351 to leisure=horse_riding (horse riding centres). Therefore they are no longer rendered like buildings. This was probably not intended. All buildings should have a building=* tag. If these buildings are indoor arenas you can tag them building=riding_hall INSTEAD OF leisure=horse_riding. The tag leisure=horse_riding is not for buildings, it is for complete riding centres (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2951129540 is ok).
See also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=riding_hall
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding#When_not_to_use
Schlumpfhasenbär (2025-01-03 16:52:59+00:00): Ahhh. Endlich kommen die Detailergänzungen durch palimpadum in den Schmallenberger Bereich.... :-) Ich würde mich freuen, wenn du dranbleibst. VG und alles Gute für 2025!
Gregory Peony (2025-04-08 23:09:02+00:00): All of these footprints are valid and appropriately shaped but generally could be a touch smaller (shift+-/+)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160953964
Fjellrev (2025-01-28 19:40:15+00:00): Hallo Matze
Ich mache hier einfach mal den Briefträger - habe selber zuwenig Ahnung von den entstandenen Problemen.
Anscheinend ist bei deinem Edit - wahrscheinlich für dich unbemerkt - durch StreetComplete einiges an Schaden angerichtet worden.
Siehe diesen Thread https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/fulda-sehr-detailiertes-aber-qualitativ-schlechtes-fahrbahnmapping-der-petersberger-strasse/124965 im Forum.
Wäre schön wenn du das, soweit möglich, in Ordnung bringen könntest und darauf achten könntest dass dir StreetComplete nicht solchen "Müll" unterjubelt.
Dawid2849 (2025-01-03 15:44:30+00:00): Cześć. Nazwa, którą skasowałeś, jest poprawna, została nadana stosunkowo niedawno, bo pod koniec listopada. Pewnie dopiero w tym roku pojawi się tabliczka w terenie. 

Uchwała nr V.41.2024 Rady Gminy Jarocin z dnia 29 listopada 2024 r. w sprawie nadania nazwy ulicy w miejscowości Domostawa
Nazwę już przywróciłem

Pozdrawiam, 
Dawid
gurglypipe (2025-01-03 16:58:49+00:00): Hiya, does the Travelodge definitely have a storey in the roof? They didn’t last time I visited (and there are no skylights in the latest aerial imagery), so I guess some building work must have happened recently? Ta
Im Fokus (2025-01-08 20:26:45+00:00): Hallo micha, Du warst ja fix. In der WZ stand es erst gestern. Traurig, traurig, diese Drillingsschließung nach dem Aus von Café Grimm vor zweieinhalb Jahren. Ein Café traditioneller Art gibt's in Elberfeld damit wohl nicht mehr.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 09:41:11+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12471508770/history has shop = building that was added in this edit
shop=building ? Are they selling houses? Products for furnishing house? Something else?
Ianmia (2025-12-03 18:12:56+00:00): Yes they sell carports, sheds, and barns.
mcliquid (2025-01-03 18:07:46+00:00): Hallo, warum hast du das Hotel hier um 455 Meter in die Wiese verschoben?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9704687620
mcliquid (2025-01-14 15:37:42+00:00): Fixed.
arcanma (2025-01-04 11:51:47+00:00): Benvenuto Luigi,
vedo che è la tua prima modifica, ottimo!
Per quanto riguarda il controllo da te richiesto ti dico che hai lavorato molto bene, l'unica cosa è l'aggiunta di official_name, dato che corrisponde al name è inutile metterlo
Niiepce (2025-05-31 16:04:29+00:00): Hallo Claudia,
Danke für das Verbessern des Taggings der Taxonomie. Hier sind leider zwei Sachen nicht ganz perfekt:
Es gibt keine Gattung "Mammutbaum" (wenn dann ist das eine Unterfamilie)
Das Kopieren von description in species:de kann leicht zu Fehlern/ Inkonsistenzen führen, die z.B. das Suchen nach solchen Tags erschweren. Hier würde ich folgende Änderungen vorschlagen: 
zweizeilige Sumpfzypresse -> Echte Sumpfzypresse
Urwelt-Mammutbaum -> Urweltmammutbaum
Küsten-Mammutbaum -> Küstenmammutbaum
Ich wollte dich auch für diese eher kleineren Details anschreiben, weil ich gesehen habe, dass du bei der Verbesserung der Taxonomie Tags recht aktiv bist, was ich unterstütze :)
arcanma (2025-01-04 11:54:35+00:00): Review: good work
arcanma (2025-01-04 11:54:45+00:00): Review: good work
dieterdreist (2025-06-20 19:35:46+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai tolto la forma societaria dal operator (tolto SpA), non capisco perché, per me più precisione è meglio di meno precisione, e nel tag name c’era già OVS senza Spa
Awoobis (2025-01-04 15:13:41+00:00): Faktycznie. Czy relacja construction jest potrzebna? relation/17630724
Fasha4 (2025-01-04 17:55:47+00:00): Masz rację, nie jest potrzebna, bo to duplikat. Już uporządkowałem. Dzięki!
txemt (2025-05-19 00:54:44+00:00): The small section of New Berlin Rd between Sweetwater and Daryl Hill, where does the information about the HGV come from? Why is there no HGV info on the segments leading up to this particular segment. From an outside person looking in, it looks like a HGV load can only go across the street.
MarkoŠatrak (2025-05-19 08:41:17+00:00): Hi @txemt,

I’m following up about our project’s changeset. The changeset lists Bing Streetside as the imagery source. A relevant weight limit sign is visible on New Berlin Road just after its intersection with Pulaski Road. While mapping Jacksonville, our team found many similar signs that apply to small bridges over creeks and channels. In this case, we tagged the weight restriction on the road segment that corresponds to the small bridge over Sweetwater Creek on New Berlin Road.

It is not uncommon for a restriction sign to be posted near a road’s entrance while actually referring to a physical limitation, such as a bridge or overpass, farther along the way. The OSM community has discussed whether such a restriction should apply to the entire road or only to a specific structure, but there has never been firm consensus, as far as we saw. As a rule of thumb, our project maps the restriction to the segment that matches the physical limitation itself.
txemt (2025-05-19 11:04:31+00:00): That source isn’t listed. I see where it’s listed as imagery used, but the sign isn’t listed as a source. We come across the segment and there’s info on a restriction for trucks, but no sources cited where that info came from.  It’s acceptable to put “sign” in as a source for relevant info such as weight limits on bridges or height restrictions.
MarkoŠatrak (2025-05-19 11:29:18+00:00): I understand what you are saying. In our project, when a restriction comes from a straightforward, readily available source like a traffic sign visible in Streetside imagery integrated into the OSM iD editor, we normally do not add an extra source:hgv (or similar) tag to the way itself. Instead, we always cite the imagery source in the changeset comment so any mapper can backtrack what the changeset was based on.

While reviewing the existing OSM database, we found that source=sign or source:hgv=sign is used only rarely.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-17 02:10:11+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165051276
eggie (2025-01-03 17:43:10+00:00): Dag hhh   Je zou ook even contact kunnen opnemen met de mapper die hier geholpen heeft.
Er waren hier helemaal geen 4 bushaltes gemapt. Dat zijn de stop_positions. 
Wanneer je niet begrijpt hoe bushaltes in elkaar steken kun je er beter vanaf blijven.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-01-03 17:48:26+00:00): reverted by changeset #160959606
eggie (2025-01-03 17:45:18+00:00): Neem contact op met 
de mapper die hier geassisteerd heeft ipv alles nog een keer op jouw manier toe te voegen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160944473

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-01-03 17:47:37+00:00): reverted by changeset #160959548
Leo Slager (2025-01-04 10:29:14+00:00): PB verzonden met extra toelichting
Nzau (2025-01-04 11:44:26+00:00): Salut Noémie, 
Vous avez dev un nouvel éditeur dédié au trottoir ? "Luke Sidewalker 0.0.1"
J'avoue que je suis curieux 😂
Merci à toi et bon courage pour la suite !
nlehuby (2025-01-15 08:07:39+00:00): hello,

oui, mais ce n'est pas nouveau, il a été publié lors d'un hack week-end OSM en avril 2023 !

il n'édite pas les trottoirs, mais permet de renseigner quelques valeurs du tag sidewalk

https://jungle-bus.github.io/sidewalker/#17/49.21815/-0.41889
Nzau (2025-01-15 08:16:46+00:00): Ok merci pour les détails, je ne savais pas que l'on pouvait directement se connecter et contribuer, c'est top !
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-18 04:02:42+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165094884
stillhart (2025-06-15 09:15:07+00:00): very nicely mapped 👌
TrickyFoxy (2025-01-03 16:34:30+00:00): 👋 Что-то пошло не так и получился длинный переход https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348287064
ToniHaralović (2025-01-21 09:08:42+00:00): Maxweight was tagged based on outdated street-level photo (Mapillary), there is no weight restriction sign on newer photos (Bing streetside)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161591712
une abeille (2025-01-03 19:10:59+00:00): Au futur, svp laisser l’adresse :)
unemtlmappeuse (2025-01-03 19:31:13+00:00): 3406 Ontario St E, Montreal, Quebec H1W 1P9

Désoler!!
MarcoR (2025-01-06 14:59:30+00:00): Ciao!

Il contorno del Comune di Cosenza è rappresentato da una relazione: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/39859. Le relazioni sono comode nei casi in cui ogni membro può far parte di più relazioni, in questo caso i confini dei Comuni confinanti tra loro.

Sulle way di confine si usa name:left e name:right per indicare i Comuni a sinistra e a destra del percorso (a riguardo dai un'occhiata alla pagina wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Forward_%26_backward,_left_%26_right#Left_e_right).

Aggiungere il tag name ai membri della relazione in questo caso è un errore.

Buon mapping,
Marco.
kaltuna (2025-11-22 12:42:32+00:00): Hallo, schaust Du Dir bitte mal diesen Hinweis an ? Mir kommt das auch seltsam vor, zumal die Fläche mit Bürogebäuden bebaut ist und ich nicht glaube, dass sie für ein DataCenter abgerissen werden. Es geht um diese Baustelle:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1340570764
Werden die Gebäude tatsächlich abgerissen und ein DataCenter gebaut ?
Viele Grüße,
kaltuna
grzegorzmilosz (2025-01-03 17:08:01+00:00): Proszę o nie usuwanie numeracji drogi oraz o nie stosowanie unsigned_ref gdyż droga posiada tabliczkę z numerem drogi powiatowej co można sprawdzić na załączonym zdjęciu a jej przebieg na mapie powiatowego zarządu dróg.
Zdjęcie: https://drive.google.com/file/d/10ESif6RK3uuKzHPmZdXBeh0mDZajpoRO/view?usp=sharing
Mapa: http://pzd-olawa.pl/zalaczniki/MapaDrogPowiatowych2020.pdf
grzegorzmilosz (2025-01-03 17:26:57+00:00): Proszę o nie usuwanie numeracji drogi oraz o nie stosowanie unsigned_ref gdyż droga posiada tabliczkę z numerem drogi powiatowej co można sprawdzić na załączonym zdjęciu a jej przebieg na mapie powiatowego zarządu dróg.
Zdjęcie: https://drive.google.com/file/d/18qRLbNowi2u_tqHz6IrLQh3urgXBRTWJ/view?usp=sharing
Mapa: http://pzd-olawa.pl/zalaczniki/MapaDrogPowiatowych2020.pdf
BCNorwich (2025-01-05 08:57:36+00:00): Hi, I've removed the fords as I believe they are fiction.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:16:52+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801557
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:16:46+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801556
joost schouppe (2025-04-07 08:02:02+00:00): Hi Tommy,
I don't find any online references for "Main dans la Main" at Loverval, here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12471780854
What's your source for this?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:16:41+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801553
BCNorwich (2025-01-04 08:07:01+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've added the address and website, please check.

Regards Bernard.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:16:36+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801551
bazgal (2025-01-04 11:21:30+00:00): salut, 
j'ai vu sur OSM Inspector le fixme que tu as positionné (très récemment : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1088766055#map=16/45.53726/1.83753), j'ai mis à jour le tracé par rapport au Cadastre.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-01-27 02:16:30+00:00): DWG revert - Google Maps used as Source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161801549
Eslam_Elsayed (2025-01-05 14:29:11+00:00): Hello Ayumu "Osaka" Kasuga,
I noticed that you changed the classification for some streets in the following changesets:
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160960328
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160959539
 One of the changes involved shifting the classification of this road from "Primary" to "Motorway" However, this classification does not seem to be suitable for the road network.
 Could you please provide the sources or reasoning behind these edits?
 Here’s the link to the streets for reference:
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/728130096/history
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050764767/history
 Best regards,
 Eslam Elsayed
DawsZed (2025-01-04 08:37:35+00:00): Hi Johnny111101, I've reverted this changeset because the tunnel you've changed from a rail ferry line does not exist. I'm assuming you're trying to add a long-proposed tunnel at this location (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-Harbor_Rail_Tunnel), but given that it's not funded nor out of environment review, adding this now is too premature for OpenStreetMap. The map we are working to build here should represent ground truth, and without strong evidence otherwise, it should generally not be added to the map. I encourage you to check out the wiki on best practices for editing: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160976893
f_husni (2025-02-25 03:50:02+00:00): Hallo saya melihat ada editan mas/mba di osm yang mana memebentuk jalan tapi tidak tersambung ke jalan lain https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1348310147#map=16/-7.03550/106.69864 

kalau bisa jika ingin mengedit jalan, harus tersambung ke jalan terdekatnya karena ini akan mempengaruhi error pada sistem routing osm. 

terimakasih
pitfire (2025-01-04 05:10:51+00:00): Hi gernl,

Dorfkrug (1985851952), v7
 
Thanks for your contributions.
 English abbreviations are always used for the days of the week and months.

(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours)

The tool can help you:
https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

Greeting pitfire
dieterdreist (2025-03-16 17:52:06+00:00): Hi, IMHO this is vandalism, you cannot delete several aspects of the Piazza Navona (the square and the pedestrian area) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9202510/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5150439/
without asking anybody, on your mobile phone, and add some more tags to a way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4247138/ which isn't all "pedestrian area" because there are fountains and other objects on the square.
GBAB (2025-03-17 10:09:04+00:00): Dear / Carissimo / Lieber dieterdreist,

thank you for you message.
Just to understand each other:

The problem is that the area of the three fountains of Piazza Navona seem paved on OSM (together with the rest of the square)?

Thank you!

Gábor
dieterdreist (2025-03-17 12:33:37+00:00): Dear Gábor, yes, the problem is you conflated the square with the pedestrian area
dieterdreist (2025-03-17 12:34:04+00:00): btw also at Campo de‘ Fiori
GBAB (2025-03-17 12:54:08+00:00): Dear dieterdreist,

yes, you are right. What I have done is that I merged the two Piazza Navonas and two Campos into one, since also in real life there is one of them (as far as I can remember from my last stay in Rome some weeks ago). ;-)

I thought that the fountains and the statue of Giordano Bruno are actually parts of the square so there might not be need of a multipolygon where the inner members are not parts of the whole (e.g. an isle in a lake is not part of the water).

However, I admit that I ignored that, though these objects are part of the square but, they are not part of the pavement… I might have done a mistake.

Nevertheless, I don't think in compromises the usability of the map in any aspect (except maybe if someone wants to measure the surface of the paved are on these piazze) so rating my edits as vandalism seems a bit exaggerated…

Thus, if you think it more appropriate, I can transform these places into multipolygons where the statue and the places are excluded from the pavement and then it will be more accurate and look nicer than it looks now.

What do you think of it?
Kind regards

Gábor
dieterdreist (2025-03-17 15:08:14+00:00): Hi,
I agree that it is not vandalism, as you have acted in good faith, although I believe if someone wants to restructure the representation of a landmark, which both squares are, and they are in higher two digit version numbers, just ironing over is not what should be done, e.g. you could have written in the community forum about your plans, asking for comments.
dieterdreist (2025-03-17 19:37:45+00:00): I am sure we need a distinct square and a distinct highway area object, because the fountains and statues are part of the square but not of the highway.
GBAB (2025-03-18 20:30:32+00:00): Dear dieterdreist,

now there are two distinct features on both piazze: one of a pedestrian highway and on of a square with the appropriate distinction of tagging:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163791363

Cheers

Gábor
GBAB (2025-03-18 20:32:14+00:00): …and another question: is there any hierarchy between editing software? E.g. is an edit more valueable if it is done with e.g. iD than it would be by JOSM? Or vice versa?
dieterdreist (2025-03-21 23:08:45+00:00): no, it is not about a hierarchy, but in general I would suspect a mobile editor to give less overview, just because of the screen size, it is not a hard criterion, you probably can do everything on a small screen as well, it just seems easier to overlook something when dealing with situations like piazza navona, that are quite busy.
Cheers,
Martin
DaveF (2025-01-04 16:38:36+00:00): These edits make not improvement to the OSM database. It just fragments entities making them more laborious to edit.

The #SharpTurns /still/ remain!