piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2023-04-11 21:15:00+00:00): Moin
orchard ist schon richtig. Hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:orchard%3Dmeadow_orchard gibt's Details.
Du schreibst: "Scheint OSM nicht zu kennen" :)
OSM an sich kennt alles und nichts. Jeder kann alles mit beliebigen tags bestücken. Was du meinst ist dein gerade genutzter Editor (iD), der kennt eine begrenzte Anzahl an tags und schlägt diese vor. Das bedeutet erstmal überhaupt nicht, dass diese richtig oder vollständig sind. Im Wiki findest du meistens schon viel. In der Diskussion mit erfahrenen Mappern geht noch mehr ;)

Meine Frage: Das Luftbild gibt auf der Fläche keine Bäume her. Du warst vermutlich vor Ort und kannst besser sagen, ob da mittlerweile Obstbäume stehen. Wenn das der Fall ist, ist deine Änderung vollkommen in Ordung. Lass dich vom Editor nicht ärgern :)

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134788427
Nüsschen (2023-04-11 21:27:36+00:00): Hi, 
super danke, dann passt das ja! :-) 
Soweit ich mich erinnere, sind die Bäume im Herbst 2021 gepflanzt worden und wollen erst noch was werden. Das Luftbild (NRW Ortho) ist wohl ein wenig älter, aber nicht viel.
VG, Nüsschen
Emilius123 (2023-04-12 21:07:16+00:00): Herzlich Willkommen! Und vielen Dank für die vielen Eintragungen und Änderungen!
SomeoneElse (2023-04-12 09:42:17+00:00): Hello again,
It looks like the Chiltern Hills AONB got broken again here, and also the Icknield Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4719539 (though as you can see there are lots of other gaps in that still).  This happened before at https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/134088053 .
If you need any help detecting and fixing these, please don't hestitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-04-12 09:44:17+00:00): Actually one more thing - I can see at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=18547093 that a few people have asked you questions.  Maybe you're not seeing these messages at all?  If you are, please do comment on one of the changesets to say so so that people can see that you're reading them.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-12 06:06:10+00:00): you forgot to tag some of the features. make sure to resolve josms warnings before uploading
gscholz (2023-04-22 05:51:54+00:00): Hi Ana Paula,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.40962&lat=-25.33425&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
AngocA (2023-04-11 23:22:06+00:00): Hola Oscar. Podrías indicar más detalles al momento de guardar tus cambios. La palabra "Huila" no es muy explícita. Mejoraste caminos? borraste, añadiste?
wireguy (2023-04-12 12:47:48+00:00): peace, the delaware bay relation is broken again, please investigate
rskedgell (2023-04-11 21:52:35+00:00): The gate was already (and correctly) tagged as access=private, why change it to access=no?

You could add locked=yes if that seems appropriate.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:locked
BCNorwich (2023-04-12 06:01:54+00:00): As the service is to a farmyard I would have thought the access would be agricultural, access=agricultural
stripeyjoe (2023-04-12 08:02:38+00:00): All I know is Komoot consistently tries to route cycle rides via this gate. How would I prevent that?
ZeLonewolf (2023-04-23 03:55:33+00:00): I don't agree with this change.  Based on the short length, this should be highway=trunk + expressway=yes.
Glassman (2023-04-11 22:14:21+00:00): Nice to see you back again
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134789267
ivanbranco (2023-04-11 20:23:17+00:00): Ciao yannis323,

questo è un revert, non è un "aggiustamento". Ti sei iscritto oggi e di 21 changeset caricati fin ora ben 10 sono revert effettuati con il reverter_plugin di JOSM dei revert dell'utente Andrea Musuruane di edits di un utente che non esiste piu'. Non sembri un utente alle prime armi, puoi motivare questi revert?
SomeoneElse (2023-04-11 22:59:34+00:00): Indeed a revert is NOT an adjustment. Please discuss your edits in the Italian forum, as I suggested earlier.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-15 09:06:54+00:00): Please don't duplicate roads
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134789494
mike140 (2023-04-11 21:01:28+00:00): Пам'ятник має саме трикутну форму? Зазвичай позначаємо пам'ятники однією точкою
user_15484961 (2023-04-12 10:48:41+00:00): П'єдестал трикутний з картою україни та гарматою. Сьогодні дощ. Затра долучу фото
BCNorwich (2023-04-12 07:01:34+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If the building is still there (as it was in 2015), then it ought not to be deleted from OSM. Rather the tags should be amended to reflect the current status of the building. There are disused tags that can be used on the building and name. There's also the historic tag that can be added.

Regards Bernard.
tinktonk (2023-04-12 15:21:08+00:00): Hi Bernard - thanks for that! The building is indeed there (just - it's structurally unsound and is near to collapse) so there's no problem with that showing, but the tag stating incorrectly that it's a Baptist chapel has led to frequent break-ins and occasional damage (if unintended) to this private property. I'll look at historical tags but I don't think there's a tag to point out private property?
JJIglesias (2023-04-11 21:43:55+00:00): Saludos. Agregar tambien el Tag Phone=+591-xxxx es muy importante para este tipo de Puntos de Interes (POI)
Gracias
JJ
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:27:39+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Gustavo22Soares (2023-04-25 21:51:53+00:00): Hi Guido, thanks for pointing out! For some reason, our script generated those errors to the data. Although we do check block by block, it seems some were left behind. Thanks for the fixing (and I fixed a lot too, and we also improved the script), as we will keep an eye on OSMI to see if some more appear (right now Fortaleza seems clean on geometry errors).

Thanks again!

Best,
Gustavo
gscholz (2023-04-26 05:47:21+00:00): Hi Gustavo,
thanks for your response. There seems to be still some work to do regarding your script. A bunch of errors came up today, duplicate nodes as well as self intersecting ways.
Guido
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:23:51+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-04-16 16:45:09+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:24:32+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:24:07+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:26:30+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-04-16 16:45:23+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:24:03+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:23:57+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:25:11+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
DUGA (2024-01-15 16:04:25+00:00): Looks extremely ugly and unprofessional.
eggie (2023-04-12 06:02:20+00:00): Hoi.. Wellicht heb je wat aan deze foto's om de nieuwste ontwikkelingen te zien. Er verschijnen regelmatig nieuwe.. sommige helaas bewolkt..
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=12-04-2022&loc=53.33156%2C6.511599%2C17z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2022-09-05&acqid=20220905_105501_SV2-01&sensor=SuperView-1
Groet
eggie
mucx (2023-04-11 21:16:48+00:00): See https://www.umweltatlas.bayern.de/standortauskunft/rest/reporting/sb_geotope/generate/Geotope.pdf?additionallayerfieldvalue=190R020
mucx (2023-04-11 21:20:30+00:00): https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moulin-Kame
user_18760664 (2023-04-11 22:16:10+00:00): is this really a video games shop?
user_5359 (2023-04-12 11:38:02+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.osm.org/node/10803095798. What is the mea of the tag İşitme cihazı tamiri = Mikroteknik İşitme Cihazları Servis Merkezi?
MxxCon (2023-04-14 01:45:46+00:00): Do you know this place's name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134790992
BCNorwich (2023-04-12 05:52:09+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, you've added a building within an existing building, duplication. I've removed the duplication. The business Accenture is mapped as a node with description tags.

Regards Bernard.
rskedgell (2023-07-19 07:04:08+00:00): Relation #15710507 "Relation for collecting  station buildings that are not part of relations" seems to contain a lot of highways and landuse areas which have nothing to do with station buildings.

Is this intentional? If so, why?
rskedgell (2024-02-05 08:49:53+00:00): Roads removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147083834
rskedgell (2024-02-05 08:56:25+00:00): Cycleways, sidewalks, crossings and PRoWs removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147084021
rskedgell (2024-02-05 08:59:43+00:00): As the relation's name (changed to description, because it's clearly not a name in the OSM sense) explicitly states that it is for collecting *buildings*, is there any reason for it to contain objects which are not tagged with building=* or building:part=* ?

Also, please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories
rskedgell (2024-02-05 09:03:31+00:00): Unrelated landuse polygons removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147084307
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-15 09:04:28+00:00): Please only map valid features
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134791509
joost schouppe (2023-05-11 07:56:58+00:00): Hoi Ruben,
Je hebt in het speelbos heel wat dubbele paden gecreëerd. Zie https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135964575 voor de paden die ik heb gedelete. De "boardwalk" bruggen heb ik ook nog aangeduid als highway, anders zijn ze geen deel van het routenetwerk.
RubOSM (2023-05-11 08:09:30+00:00): Dankjewel Joost!
Ik dacht de dubbele paden in JOSM verwijderd te hebben, maar blijkbaar liep daar toch nog iets fout.
Ik onthou de tip voor de boardwalks!
Much appreciated.
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:26:51+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
DressyPear4 (2023-04-12 19:49:13+00:00): Olá, você percebeu que há vários edifícios que estão duplicados?
Aqui por exemplo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292868116/history já existia uma edificação e agora foi adicionado outras por cima dela.
Recomendo fazer importações menores, de quadra em quadra e mesclar com dados já existentes antes de enviar.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134791681
DressyPear4 (2023-04-12 19:57:38+00:00): A proposito, o josm tem uma janela de validação que deve ter alertado todos esses erros ao enviar.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.54267&lat=-3.74472&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
PlayzinhoAgro-imports (2023-04-23 02:23:03+00:00): Opa, desculpa teve um erro e os edifícios sobrepostos já foram resolvidos
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:23:46+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2023-04-18 07:27:10+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
your recent activities have (again) created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51093&lat=-3.78611&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
user_3022894 (2023-04-12 08:04:48+00:00): Hi,

vielen Dank für die Korrekturen,
hier in Solingen ist vieles kaputt gegangen.

Viele Grüße
Lukas aka Elefant
Rainero (2023-04-17 19:39:02+00:00): Ja gerne doch. Mit Revertieren ging es nicht mehr, weil es eine Vielzahl von Änderungen waren seit dem ursprünglich richtigen Zustand. Und die eine oder andere Adresse habe ich im ersten Schritt übersehen, daher u. a. diese kleine Nachkorrektur.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Daldek (2023-04-13 07:13:50+00:00): Parking przy rynku został niedawno zlikwidowany, aktualnie teren jest ogrodzony i jest zakaz wjazdu
m@rio (2023-04-13 07:27:34+00:00): Ok, dzięki za info - skasowany.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-15 08:54:13+00:00): You shouldn't tag a golf course as a restaurant building regardless
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134791904
Enock4seth (2023-05-28 23:24:03+00:00): Why are you tagging every single building within an existing hospital with amenity=hospital ?
Qwajo OSM (2023-05-29 12:00:55+00:00): In the quest of trying to modify an initial mapping done, thats the result. It will be duly reverted.
Leo Slager (2023-04-12 13:13:32+00:00): Dag Wanderer,
Die landuse residential zit vol met fouten:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=6.76355&lat=52.30757&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
Misschien kun je daar nog even naar kijken ?
Wanderer2000 (2023-04-12 19:54:05+00:00): Dag Leo,
Zo te zien heb ik per ongeluk op orthogonalize way gedrukt op die landuse, niet mijn bedoeling geweest. Aangezien het om een import uit 2011 gaat, lijkt het mij een idee om deze grote landuse=residential op te splitsen in wijken en buurten. Lijkt mij nuttiger dan een revert.
Groetjes Wanderer
Leo Slager (2023-04-12 22:17:15+00:00): Lijkt mij een goed idee.
Als je thuis bent in die materie kun je de wijzigingen aanbrengen.
Ik zet wel de vorige versie van landuse=residential terug op de kaart.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-04-11 22:20:16+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10803217917

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kubahahaha (2023-04-11 22:25:21+00:00): poprawione
user_5359 (2023-04-12 12:18:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/386206591 (one of eight objects). What is the mean of the tag CdOH = 06C0000002000805124 ?
arz54 (2023-04-12 21:13:59+00:00): hello, thanks to report this, it's only a mistake i have forgot to change the key to the right one
user_18305684 (2023-06-05 13:39:52+00:00): Bonjour,

sur le chemin 290077094 et ceux qui lui sont contigus tu as rajouté le nom Canal de Pierrelatte et un code sandre : je viens de regarder sur le site officiel de https://www.sandre.eaufrance.fr/, ce canal n'a pas de nom ni de code sandre : quelle est ta source de données pour tes modifications ?

Cordialement
arz54 (2023-06-06 02:47:37+00:00): bonjour,
Pour rajouter les codes sandres j'ai croisée différente sources de données.
En revanche je ne retrouve plus le fichier qui ma servis pour le canal, dans le doute je vais supprimer le nom et le code sandre (si jamais je retrouve mon fichier je rajouterais les tags avec la source)
user_18305684 (2023-06-13 12:47:42+00:00): Ok, merci pour ta réponse.
Bonne continuation.
user_18305684 (2023-06-13 16:35:38+00:00): J'ai trouvé le nom sur les feuilles du cadastre de Bollène et Mondragon : "canal de réalimentation rive gauche" puis "canal de la Nappe".
J'ai mis à jour avec des notes ou source:name
Filip009 (2023-04-13 12:27:11+00:00): Túto cestu ste zabudli otagovať https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1161540312
Mirecnet (2023-04-13 19:37:58+00:00): Je to chyba v zaplave dat a bola opravena.
Pekne, ze ma sledujes. Aspon niekoho to zaujima :)
Ak vsak budes este raz vypisovat hovadiny do fora, tak budes bloknuty...
Filip009 (2023-04-13 19:44:59+00:00): Neboli to hovadiny boli to reálne chyby, ktoré treba opraviť. Ale niekomu zbytočne vysvetľovať aj tak si pôjde svoje.
Mirecnet (2023-04-13 21:28:26+00:00): Chyby su uz davno opravene bez toho, aby som to musel preberat pred publikom. Tak nezabudni na to, co som ti napisal. Pekny vecer :)
InsertUser (2023-04-12 12:04:28+00:00): Normally it is standard to change the name key to old_name and then add the new name so people searching with out of date information can still find it. This is available by selecting the object and scrolling down to the bottom of the left panel in the editor. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name
dentych (2024-10-07 21:43:04+00:00): I'm interested in knowing why you've created a duplicate entry of Lunar Bank, instead of updating the existing data point I created a year before?

My entry has now been deleted as "duplicate" of yours, but yours contain less information than the one I created...
dentych (2024-10-07 21:43:28+00:00): For reference, the changeset I created is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10117416628/history/1
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2024-10-09 20:16:51+00:00): I guess I did not see your Lunar bank.
I got date from FVST, apparantly the Lunar bank in Århus has a canteen/restaurant.

I do not know why me version and not yours were kept after resolving the duplicate issue.
Ginger Lover (2023-04-12 12:27:14+00:00): You don't understand what I do.  I design golf courses, and people will request their courses to be built in the game.  I restore them so they can play it forever, even though the course is gone.  If there is imagery for the old course layout, I use it.  

Please let me know if there is a way for me to spline the golf course and delete the work I did once I did my thing.
ChehrehBargi (2023-04-21 00:52:20+00:00): سلام علیکم
طبق ویکی osm ما مجاز به ثبت تغییرات طبق مستندات هستیم. ولی تغییراتی که در تابلو شهرداری هنوز لحاظ نشده را میتوان در تگ loc name اضافه کرد.
با تشکر
ChehrehBargi (2023-04-21 01:10:59+00:00): در میدان مبارزان
با توجه به تابلو نام اینجا میدان مبارزان است. نام محلی (loc name) دروازه مشگین بوده و با توجه به اینکه نمی توان اینجا را چهارراه نامید، (به علت مسدود بودن مسیر کنار پل به سمت روبه رو) و قابلیت تردد از کنار پل تنها به سمت راست، لذا می توان در تگ alt name عبارت تقاطع را هم افزود
ChehrehBargi (2023-04-21 01:56:17+00:00): در کوچه پرستار 3
از محدودیت هایی در رابطه با تریلر های دوقلو، کشنده های بیش از 3.5 تن، سواری کش ها و محموله های ترافیکی استفاده کرده اید.
برایم جالب بود و جهت ترجمه عنوان و سایر توضیحات اینها در سایت و نیز در josm اقدام خواهم کرد.
باسپاس
ChehrehBargi (2023-04-14 20:08:29+00:00): سلام. توجه داشته باشید ثبت های ما طبق تابلوها و بازدیدهای میدانی‌ست و در صورت نبود تابلو از نام محلی استفاده می کنیم. ثبتی که بنده از این جا داشته ام طبق تابلوها بوده. تصاویر mapillary هم اضافه کرده ام. اگر دلیل دیگری برای ثبت خود دارید، مستندات اضافه کنید
ChehrehBargi (2023-04-14 20:22:06+00:00): در مورد مسیر منتهی به مجتمع مسکونی در مشگین شهر هم، چون داخل مجتمع نیست از تگ service استفاده نمی کنیم. این مسیر کوچه هست و جدا از مجتمع.