piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
zorglubu (2024-06-27 12:25:43+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour vos contributions.

j'ai quelques remarques sur ce groupe de modification, je vous prie de les prendre comme des remarques constructives car je suis persuadé qu'un compte comme le vôtre peut apporter beaucoup à OSM.

1° Ce "path" que vous avez ajouté (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1296573322#map=16/45.6475/1.6145) croise un autre chemin en sa partie nord.

Si vous cliquez sur le bouton "Modifier", vous verrez cette erreur signalée à gauche de l'écran, il est important de tenter de résoudre les erreurs signalées.

2° Ce chemin a été collé "sur" un contour de forêt. Il est d'une façon générale préférable de NE PAS coller des chemins à des contours, car cela rend les modifications extrêmement laborieuses, lorsqu'on ne veut toucher que l'un des deux.

3° Le tracé de ce chemin ne correspond pas à ce que l'on peut deviner comme tracé sur les photos prises du ciel, ni à ce qui est affiché sur BD Topo (en mode modification, bouton "Couches" à droite, et case à cocher BD Topo dans le bas de la liste).

Je n'ai rien modifié, je vous laisse regarder :-)

N'hésitez pas à me poser des questions si vous le souhaitez.
Bien cordialement.
SrouxVisitLimousin (2024-07-02 15:14:27+00:00): Bonjour, 
J'ai utilisé de manière constructive vos remarques. 
J'ai modifié et amélioré les traces avec le fond BD Topo.
J'ai évité les chevauchements malheureux et évité les croisements et les contours. 
Je pense avoir progressé dans la compréhension des couches et des calques. Cela participe à ma formation en cours... Merci de m'avoir alerté. 
Je reste à l'écoute de la communauté. 
Bien cordialement
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2024-06-27 07:54:18+00:00): Ces changements sont la suite de ceux-ci : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153152832
◪ Jarv (2024-06-27 12:40:07+00:00): Hi Ravi18, you've requested a review on this change. Looks fine. However you can press "Q" once you've drawn the shape to give it 90 degree angles. Also the building could have been tagged with "house" instead of "yes"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153235855
◪ Jarv (2024-06-27 12:40:00+00:00): Hi Ravi18, you've requested a review on this change. Looks fine. However you can press "Q" once you've drawn the shape to give it 90 degree angles. Also the building could have been tagged with "house" instead of "yes"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153235896
infeeeee (2024-06-27 14:34:25+00:00): Szia!
Mi a forrása ennek a szerkesztésnek?
Supaplex (2024-06-28 01:55:04+00:00): Hi

The buildings you remove might be more accurate. The one building you modified is oversized. Can you recover the original buildings?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153236491
HarukaIwai_Bloomberg_News (2024-06-28 05:58:40+00:00): Thank you for your review.
From the aerial photo, it looked like separate buildings due to differences in the roofs and other features. However, after checking street view images, I realized it's actually one apartment building, so I've made the correction.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153236491
TrickyFoxy (2025-06-18 01:03:40+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167760655
Asteliks (2024-06-27 10:22:33+00:00): Ze stacji Warszawa Zachodnia poza WKD korzysta też Szybka Kolej Miejska, którą kwalifikujemy jako kolej miejską (lekką). Link do tras SKM: https://www.skm.warszawa.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/SKM_KOREKTA-SCHEMATU_MAJ_3_BIG-scaled.jpg

Proszę o wycofanie zmiany.
Anas masuris (2024-06-27 10:28:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:railway%3Dlight_rail

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/railway-light-rail-w-polsce/111729/8

Proszę sobie poczytać, potem edytować.

Już raz pisałem, że był poruszany na forum temat light_rail - SKM się nie kwalifikuje jako kolej lekka - ma taką samą sygnalizację, co kolej ciężka (KM, IC, PR)
Anas masuris (2024-06-27 10:35:11+00:00): WKD ma osobny przystanek (poniżej węzła), a obecnie też WKD ma w zasadzie wszystko podobne do kolei ciężkiej (sygnalizacja, napięcie) oraz połączenia w obrębie kilku miast
TrickyFoxy (2025-06-18 01:03:41+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167760655
TrickyFoxy (2025-06-18 01:05:49+00:00): Что это?
Supaplex (2024-06-28 01:53:23+00:00): Hi, Keep in mind that OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project. These islands have no change of control from China to Vietnam. Why do you edit the names? And for the disputed territory, here is an editing guideline Ref: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories 

--- 
Google Translate 

Xin chào, Hãy nhớ rằng OpenStreetMap là một dự án hợp tác. Những hòn đảo này không có sự thay đổi quyền kiểm soát từ Trung Quốc sang Việt Nam. Tại sao bạn lại chỉnh sửa tên? Và đối với vùng lãnh thổ đang tranh chấp, đây là hướng dẫn chỉnh sửa Tham khảo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153239459

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153271562
infeeeee (2024-06-27 14:32:36+00:00): Szia!
Mi a forrása ennek a szerkesztésnek?
infeeeee (2024-06-27 14:31:40+00:00): Szia! Üdv az OpenStreetMapen!

Google maps és streetview semmilyen formában nem használható fel forrásként OpenStreetMap szerkesztésre forráslént, nem kompatibilis az ODbL licensszel. Azokat a szerkesztéseidet ahol ezeket megemlíted mindenképp vissza kell vonni.

További infó:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ#2.1.5._Can_I_copy_data_from_Google?

Kérlek mindenképp vedd fel a kapcsolatot valamelyik csatornán a magyar szerkesztő közösséggel. Elérhetőségeinket ezen az oldalon találod: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Közösség
Supaplex (2024-06-27 09:53:18+00:00): Hi,

Keep in mind that OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project. These islands have no change of control from China to Vietnam. Why do you edit the names? And for the disputed territory, here is an editing guideline
Ref: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories

---
Google Translate

Xin chào,

Hãy nhớ rằng OpenStreetMap là một dự án hợp tác. Những hòn đảo này không có sự thay đổi quyền kiểm soát từ Trung Quốc sang Việt Nam. Tại sao bạn lại chỉnh sửa tên? Và đối với vùng lãnh thổ đang tranh chấp, đây là hướng dẫn chỉnh sửa

Tham khảo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153239459
Supaplex (2024-06-27 09:53:19+00:00): Hi,

Keep in mind that OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project. These islands have no change of control from China to Vietnam. Why do you edit the names? And for the disputed territory, here is an editing guideline
Ref: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories

---
Google Translate

Xin chào,

Hãy nhớ rằng OpenStreetMap là một dự án hợp tác. Những hòn đảo này không có sự thay đổi quyền kiểm soát từ Trung Quốc sang Việt Nam. Tại sao bạn lại chỉnh sửa tên? Và đối với vùng lãnh thổ đang tranh chấp, đây là hướng dẫn chỉnh sửa

Tham khảo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153239459
NorthCrab_upload (2024-06-27 09:40:26+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12014612803

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Jan Prazak (2024-07-23 14:41:55+00:00): Hello and sorry for late reply. I am not really familiar with creating parcel boxes and I was unaware that something is wrong. Aomeone else (IreuN) already made more changes to the box. Feel free to correct anything that still may be incorrect. Greetings from CZ 🍻
NorthCrab (2024-09-02 12:05:08+00:00): Hey, parcel boxes simply shouldn't have names as its assigned to them automatically based on the wikidata and ref numbers.
jcr83 (2024-07-25 15:57:25+00:00): Bonjour,
Si le sentier n'est pas accessible au public, il faut mettre access=private, et non access=permit qui signifie que toute personne peut obtenir une autorisation en en faisant la demande.
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
MaximGRVL (2024-07-25 16:40:18+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai corrigé. Merci pour la précision.
DD1GJ (2024-06-27 10:27:37+00:00): Ein "Park" mit Schaukel, Klettergerüst, Sandkasten, usw. Wieso soll das kein Spielplatz sein? 
Verfälsche bitte nicht die OSM-Daten! Dieser Änderungssatz wurde rückgängig gemacht,
stololo (2024-06-27 11:08:06+00:00): Ich weiß nicht woher Du Deine Informationen dazu ja hast, aber der Spielplatz würde abgebaut, als südlich davon das Neubaugebiet samt größerem Spielplatz dazu kam. 

Faktisch ist da nichts mehr. Ich bin gerade dabei den FNP ändern zu lassen, daher dachte ich es wäre sinnvoll das auch hier zu ändern: 

Hier aktuelle Bilder als Nachweis:

https://easyupload.io/7auoso
https://easyupload.io/99onil
https://easyupload.io/zjxp03

Wäre das nicht der korrekte Weg?
DD1GJ (2024-06-27 11:48:25+00:00): Hallo stololo,

herzlich willkommen bei OSM. Entschuldige bitte meine voreilige Fehleinschätzung der Situation aufgrund des knappen Änderungssatzkommentares und  veralteter Luftbilder. Leider kommt es sehr häufig vor, dass neue Mapper bewusst bestehende Flächen aller Art in "Parks" umwandeln, um damit Pokémon Go zu ihren Gunsten zu beeinflussen. 

Ich werde meine Änderung heute Abend selbstverständlich zurücksetzen.

Viel Spaß mit OSM, Joachim
stololo (2024-06-27 12:55:09+00:00): Moin Joachim, 

das kann ich dann natürlich verstehen, dass man dann etwas vorsichtiger bzgl. derartiger Änderungen ist. 

Bei nächsten Änderungen gelobe ich direkt einen ausführlichen Kommentar und wenn möglich Bilder einzubringen, mir war das nicht ganz klar, wie das optimal gehandhabt werden sollte. 

Gruß 
Christopher
DD1GJ (2024-06-28 08:18:25+00:00): Moin Christopher,

Anhand Deiner Fotos habe ich die Fläche in "Erholungsgebiet" geändert https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Drecreation_ground
Für einen Park sollte  doch schon etwas mehr vorhanden sein als eine Bank und ein Papierkorb. Das Einbringen von Bildern in Änderungssätze ist im Projekt eher unüblich. Bei besonderen Objekten wie Denkmmälern, besonderen Bauwerken verlinken wir zu Wikipedia, Wikimedioa und Wikidata, dalls dort bereits etwas vorhanden sind.

Weitere Informationen findest Du z.B. im Tutorial: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
gurglypipe (2024-06-27 10:38:30+00:00): Hiya, looking at https://mpr.lt/c/48118/t/229418909, the description for the challenge is just “challenges description” repeated several times. That’s not very helpful to anyone.

Is there a description somewhere of what objectives you’re trying to achieve, and how the challenge tasks have been generated?

Thanks
LakatosVL (2024-06-27 11:50:58+00:00): Hi gurglypipe.
Thanks for pointing this out. The task description is updated. Most of the hints includes verification on whether the used tagging scheme is not in conflict with other tags and for most of it we are contacting local community members for additional information.
gurglypipe (2024-06-27 12:58:02+00:00): Thanks! I see the description has been updated for https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/48118, and it’s much more informative. 👌

However, the description for https://maproulette.org/browse/projects/56391, https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/48135, https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/48237, etc. all still need to be updated similarly.
Kovoschiz (2024-06-28 05:35:32+00:00): Please read carefully. `oneway=yes` is used with `oneway:bus:conditional=no @ *` and `oneway:bicycle=no` here. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway:bus
GeoAndi (2024-06-27 19:43:56+00:00): Ist das https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114219724 wirklich die Hausnummer 9? Die ist bereits nebenan eingetragen und die würde auch besser in eine auf-/absteigende Hausnummernfolge passen.
connium (2024-06-29 06:39:44+00:00): Ich bin gestern nochmals dort vorbeigegangen. Die Hausnummern daneben stimmen - an diesem Haus selbst konnte ich keine Hausnummer finden. 7 würde definitiv ins Schema passen und die 9 ist hier vermutlich falsch.
GeoAndi (2024-07-02 15:08:45+00:00): hab´s jetzt mal als Nr.7 eingetragen (siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153462184)
NeisBot (2024-06-27 10:24:24+00:00): Hi CV3X, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1296598084

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
marczoutendijk (2024-06-27 18:03:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16317

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
YomanNH (2025-01-08 13:53:55+00:00): Hej, zerkniesz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4581638 ?
Leo Slager (2024-06-27 10:48:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Nia-gara (2025-03-23 19:28:10+00:00): Your building shapes are garbage - they are about 10 times the size of the building. I'm going to delete them.
WWSS (2025-07-23 11:01:22+00:00): 請不要完全照描國外衛星影像，偏差非常非常大。
twF6wdEYwL (2025-07-23 12:16:05+00:00): 不好意思，因為著作權的限制，NLSC的正射影像圖不能直接使用於OSM的繪製，只能使用偏移大且建築物斜向投影擋住其他的國外衛星影像圖，如果OSM編輯者確實需要更佳品質的衛星圖或空照圖，請向政府請求將正射影像圖列入開放資料(Open Data)，比照日本或歐洲國家，讓製圖者可以直接使用正射投影的衛星圖做為繪製的來源，或至少開放特定建築物(例如公家機關、學校、重要工商業建築物)的投影檔為Open Data

(目前做為Open Data的NLSC地圖實在太模糊，不適合用於精準繪製)
WWSS (2025-07-23 13:37:07+00:00): 已知偏移嚴重，就請務必僅限用於新增 OSM 上尚無的物件；不可用以當依據將已繪製的東西移動/修改，甚至刪除另繪。
aseidel (2024-07-25 10:45:31+00:00): Liebe:r ChMenges,
bitte beim Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219016795 den surface-Wert korrigieren (Typo).
Danke und herzliche Grüße
Antje Seidel
#lgmaps
eggie (2024-08-09 20:41:44+00:00): Hoi Teun,

Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de BAG adresnode.
MVG
eggie
tttnnn24 (2024-08-11 07:12:33+00:00): Ha Egbert,
dank je wel. Ik volg jouw school setup niet echt consequent ben ik bang, zeker als er al gegevens deels ingevuld zijn. En vaak ook nog fout.

 cheers,

teun (die hoopt dat je weer helemaal op orde bent)
eggie (2024-08-11 07:34:44+00:00): 👍
mueschel (2024-06-28 08:45:09+00:00): Hallo,
bitte schau mal nach den "socket" Tags. Ein "socket:ccs" gibt es nicht:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket:*
a_nussmueller (2024-07-01 05:46:22+00:00): Hallo!
Entschuldige bitte, das hatte ich übersehen. Ich werde es gleich richtigstellen.
Dawid2849 (2024-06-27 11:22:06+00:00): oraz planowane/budowane węzły jako istniejące
MihaiS79 (2024-06-27 11:24:58+00:00): Reasfaltat recent.
arkarjun (2024-06-27 18:44:32+00:00): Thank you for mapping #Reviewed_Good #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153242946
BPTT (2024-08-24 04:09:30+00:00): None of these ways exist on the ground in real life - why were they drawn??
A_Prokopova_lyft (2024-08-26 09:19:08+00:00): Hi BPTT, 
I’m Anastasia and I'm an OSM communications specialist on the OSM mapping team at Lyft. 
The edits were made based on the Lyft-owned sources:
New ways were added according to the Lyft owned satellite image Nearmap (May 15, 2024) (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VIN_gt6KhaB12qPZCkseFabZmksE3o6B/view?usp=drive_link ) 
According to the Lyft drivers GPS tracks (https://drive.google.com/file/d/14gtiC3w4Qny90hsxmBizYiUkdKqyexEs/view?usp=sharing)  and Lyft-owned street level image taken from Southbranch Boulevard at the intersection with South 27th Street 42.86738,-87.95129 (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SryBh_Wer_sQa4tVEtisw_0_DdgOCd9A/view?usp=drive_link ) is visible that the roads are opened for traffic.
Best regards!
aTarom (2024-06-27 12:58:42+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar, me puedes ayudar con este tag
"Active"="turism"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12014784254/history
quizás es un
motorcar=yes?
Saludos
Emilio Gomez (2024-06-27 13:43:06+00:00): Esa etiqueta la añadí por error. Ya lo he corregido, gracias por avisar. 
Un saludo.
voschix (2026-03-25 15:59:05+00:00): Hi. I noticed that yoiu added ti Via Miranese separate cycleways. This is not correct. In Via Miranese there are advisory cycle lanes (in OSM speak) or "corsie ciclabili" according to the Italian CdS. They were already mapped. The separate cycle ways are incorrect and redundant. Do not hesitate to contact as this is complex issue.
NeisBot (2024-06-27 11:50:24+00:00): Hi juharanta, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1296613085

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-01 12:32:15+00:00): Thank you for your mapped beach.
Looks good!

#HappyMapping
treestryder (2024-09-05 02:49:24+00:00): This ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484642093 ) was accurately mapped as a multi-use path.  Only bicycles are allowed on a cycleway. Cycleways are very rare in our parts. In fact, most of our multi-use paths require cyclists yield to those on foot. See the section for mapping pedestrian infrastructure on the Michigan Wiki page.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan
Leo Slager (2024-06-27 22:13:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
infeeeee (2024-06-27 14:39:04+00:00): Visszavonva. Kérlek csak legális források használatával térképezz a továbbiakban

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153251073
osmviborg (2024-06-27 12:27:28+00:00): Prøv 2024 luftfoto
limes11 (2024-07-03 20:29:28+00:00): Hi

bitte aufpassen: water=harbour benötigt ein natural=water.

Ich habe es hier ergänzt

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266311442#map=15/53.8596/8.7162

Bitte prüf deine weiteren Anpassungen dieser Art.

Danke und VG
treestryder (2024-09-05 03:10:08+00:00): I just drove through there and captured Mapillary imagery. Park Lake Road does not have bicycle lanes. Those are merely "fog lines". Inaccurately mapping it could get someone injured, with little recourse... as it is not a bicycle lane.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2141113966272148&focus=photo&lat=42.786646884107995&lng=-84.43308667631197&z=1.5

In Michigan, a legal bicycle lane must be:
 - 3 foot wide, when the speed limit is under 45.
 - 4 foot wide, when the speed limit is 45 or more.
 - marked as a bicycle lane by signs, lane markings or both.

You could measure and the shoulder widths. Without a measurement, the shoulder tag implies a vehicle could safely pull of the road.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shoulder
treestryder (2024-09-05 03:22:30+00:00): Another example further north where the road narrows.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=317522311432738&focus=photo&lat=42.793766416798036&lng=-84.43586189243695&z=16.1250923421062&x=0.531016159249028&y=0.5949681622636045&zoom=0
4004 (2024-07-07 23:59:06+00:00): здравствуйте, Кейт. магазин сменил время работы, видел своими глазами https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5538465315
kate_rocketdata (2024-07-18 07:51:02+00:00): Добрый день!
Спасибо, что изменили время работы на актуальное.
Leo Slager (2024-06-27 22:30:04+00:00): feedback:
prima zo.
Leo Slager (2024-06-27 22:36:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
gion274 (2024-07-01 09:11:52+00:00): ciao at189,
noto che hai classificato come highway=cicleway alcuni tratti nominati "Hammer Trail". Ho fatto parte di quel percorso sabato 29/6 come escursionista, nessun nome rilevato in loco e come highway riscontrati path o track senza nessuna restrizione se non quella a mezzi motorizzati (qindi niente cicleway). Forse meglio costruire una Relazione "Hammer Trail" dedicata al MTB togliendolo dai tratti di way (come si fa per i sentieri CAI)
at1839 (2024-07-01 13:22:19+00:00): Ciao Gion, grazie per i commenti.
Parto dalla fine, perchè sarà un messaggio lungo ... direi che hai ragione, quindi vedo cosa ne viene fuori ad usare highway=path con bicycle=designated foot=designated segregated=no
Aggiungo però che ... 
I tracciati in questione sono stati ripristinati e segnalati dal personale delle seggiovie in ottica MTB. Ovviamente per incentivare la vendita di risalite e/o le presenze di biker in valle. Sono segnati con bolli gialli, non rossi. Ci sono cartelli specifici all'inizio e in molti punti di incrocio, anche se oggettivamente non in tutti i punti di incrocio. 
Poi va da se che non sono vietati ai pedoni, e che ci sono tratti necessariamente promiscui, anche se per certi versi se ne vorrebbe sconsigliare l'uso ai pedoni almeno dove ci sono alternative non indicate all'uso in MTB. Ma concordo sul fatto che non si tratta di percorsi specifici di bike park, che sarebbero stati vietati ai pedoni.
IMHO la mappatura di percorsi MTB in natura e non strettamente in bike park è ancora poco affrontata e poco descritta. La creazione delle relation è possibile ma secondo me non risolutiva perchè tende a non rendere chiaro che l'utilizzo principale di quei path è MTB.
Servirebbe una voce wiki dedicata e servirebbe razionalizzare il render dei vari tag specifici, in primis mtb:scale, sui motori dedicati all'escursionismo.
Paolo
at1839 (2024-07-01 13:41:54+00:00): Per inciso ... sto valutando di usare *solo* highway=path bicycle=designated nei tratti creati ex novo per uso MTB, mentre aggiungerei foot=designated segregated=no nei tratti più ovviamente promiscui
gion274 (2024-07-01 14:16:32+00:00): Ciao Paolo, grazie per la tempestiva risposta e per le motivazioni descritte. Da escursionista mi premeva solo far notare come highway=cicleway non fosse pertinente in assenza di segnaletica anche se la wiki fa più riferimento a situazioni stradali coi classici cartelli blu. Come ti dicevo ho percorso parte di quei sentieri senza vedere cartelli nè bolli gialli vedi traccia escursione (1).
Mi sembra conveniamo, stante la situazione attuale, circa l'uso di highway=path o track con l'eventuale aggiunta di cicleway=designated, i sentieri (path) dovrebbero già implicitamente essere foot=yes.
buon mapping
Gianni
(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/gion274/traces
literan (2024-06-27 17:33:30+00:00): кривой формат адрески. Надо ставить пробел перед буквами "к", "с", "вл"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%B0#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2
UrbanPlanner69 (2024-06-28 09:25:22+00:00): Исправлено, спасибо
Leo Slager (2024-06-27 22:35:26+00:00): wikidata heb je nu weggehaald, maar dat mag er op blijven staan.
flex16 (2024-06-27 13:33:21+00:00): Hallo Stanislaw-Unruh,

denkst du noch dran den Tracktype zu entfernen, wenn du einen track umwandelst zu residential?

VG
Stanislaw-Unruh (2024-06-28 07:52:31+00:00): Ist erledigt, Danke für den Hinweis ;)
raphaelmirc (2025-05-18 23:51:47+00:00): Corrigindo varias vias do mapeador erick  mapeadas como residential em área Rural.