piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2024-10-06 10:15:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark about the way high rise or multi-story buildings are often mapped 
On the imagery, you see both the roof and a sidewall (with multiple floors) 
The imagery is taken under a certain degree and shows you the height of a building.
Don't map both the roof and the sidewalls as 1 building.
Draw just the rooflines as a building and move it to the building's footprint.
See this clip.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping
pavvv (2024-10-04 18:33:05+00:00): I wszystko było poprawnie. Tranzyt z gminy Czernica tędy jedzie do centrum.
Temat-Droga (2024-10-08 10:47:36+00:00): A wiesz jakim wygwizdowem jest gmina Czernica?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 01:19:53+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164657232
Bobropiton (2024-12-20 13:32:15+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спишем криво-косое переименование на ваш малый опыт редактирования.
Но прошу на будущее усвоить следующее:
-Название остановок мы пишем без о.п. и без кавычек. Память так Память, Конно-Спортивная Школа, значит Конно-Спортивная школа
-старое название мы не пихаем в основное. для этого существует специальный тэг old_name=*
-помимо точек остановки на путях и точки halt/station есть еще и отношение, связывающее из между собой в один узел-stop_area. Его так же надо переименовывать
Bobropiton (2024-12-20 13:33:24+00:00): будет еще полезно, если вы из основополагающих документов на переименование будете вносить и проверять при наличии код единой сетевой разметки(6 цифр) в тэге esr:user
isidor (2024-10-01 14:02:11+00:00): Tohle není pravda. Položit pár metrů betonového panelu, který před mnoha lety někde ÚPLNĚ JINDE v Praze sloužil jako podklad pro kolejnice, zrovna tady, z tohoto místa nedělá "bývalou tramvajovou trať". Ostatně ty panely jsou zde tak blízko sebe, že by tudy nikdy dvě tramvaje proti sobě neprojely - srazily by se. Míst, kde DPP nebo TSK pokládají vyřazené panely z rekonstruovaných tratí, jsou desítky, je absurdní pár metrů random betonu tagovat jako disused trať. Tady je z nich třeba uděláno nástupiště: https://maps.app.goo.gl/wR7AmvAdpNjWYR8w9 taky tam hned nakreslíme "druhou kolej smyčky"?
vojtechzaboril (2024-10-01 14:06:31+00:00): Situaci jsem nakonec vyřešil jinak, viz poslední komentář u vaší sady změn
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-29 14:49:36+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34056400/history has surface:note = Trampelpfad that was added in this edit
surface:note=Trampelpfad ? Is it simply surface=dirt? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Ddirt

Would surface=dirt replace it fully?
eggie (2024-10-01 15:46:53+00:00): Dag John,
Het staat niet meer in de BGT/BAG.
Het is ongetwijfeld weggehaald.
MVG
eggie
JLZIMMERMANN (2024-11-14 16:57:34+00:00): bonjour,
Je suis ennuyé car j'avais déjà mis un fossé à cet endroit (datant d'il y a un an) et rajouter une géométrie ayant la même fonction soit (il y a un mois) est contraire au fonctionnement d'OSM.
En effet le but est d'enrichir les objet esistant afin de garder un historique dans le temps long.
Je vais donc garder les attribut de ce fossé récent pour les affecter à celui plus ancien.
JLZIMMERMANN (2024-11-14 16:58:50+00:00): le fossé récent est ici 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1319880795#map=16/44.00527/4.95051

et l'ancien
 là 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212683508
Langlaeufer (2024-10-02 08:07:29+00:00): Ist das nicht default für highway=pedestrian?
und gilt maxspeed nicht generell nur für vehicle?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157341193
Nadjita (2024-10-02 12:46:08+00:00): Ich habe nirgendwo die Information gefunden, dass auf Fußgängerzonen in OSM Schrittgeschwindigkeit gilt. Ob man jetzt vehicle nehmen sollte oder nicht … ich bin da lieber spezifischer.
Langlaeufer (2024-10-02 13:19:11+00:00): Dann must du dass wohl bei fast alle nfußgängerzonen noch ergänzen. Wo steht denn das mit Schrittgeschwindigkeit für living_street, oder ist das auch nur so eine Idee aus dem Forum?
Nadjita (2024-10-02 13:26:58+00:00): Die stehen unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed#Implicit_maxspeed_values und da ist living_street drin, aber weder highway=footway, noch highway=pedestrian. Deswegen ergänze ich das immer, wenn ich das sehe.
Langlaeufer (2024-10-02 14:24:08+00:00): Das sagt ja auch nur was über maxspeed:type/source:maxspeed und nicht über den default für die highway - Klasse.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-08 01:19:54+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164657232
08a636a4 (2024-12-06 03:46:37+00:00): You used a footpath in an attempt to draw a boundary. This is causing issues for hikers as this footpath does not exists. Beside that this attempt has multiple warnings that are unfix-able. Recommend deleting this path.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-01 14:20:59+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6363115814

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Pigeon7 (2024-12-07 16:58:10+00:00): Odpowiedziałem przed chwilą na tę samą sugestię od Ciebie pod innym zestawem zmian, ale już poprawione.
Pozdrawiam!
NathanBnm (2024-10-21 12:03:55+00:00): Bonjour @cquest, le restaurant Courtepaille de Mondeville (52723460) n'est pas fermé. Il apparaît bien sur le site Internet : https://restaurants.courtepaille.com/restaurant-caen-mondeville-id165
jeslop (2024-10-01 14:41:05+00:00): Se ha incluído por error otro conjunto de cambios en otro lugar del mapa que añadía la superficie de la A-6.
Disculpas.
ManuelB701 (2024-10-02 04:41:39+00:00): With how much this changeset spans from Ukraine to England (itself already problematic) but moreover, the buildings are oddly specific, I believe twhat you did was armchair mapping depending on whichever amenity is located on a building than going properly through Europe which is important because the buildings' architecture can differ from the buildings' current use.

tl;dr Most likely, you did not survey this!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157343302
Edison Wen (2024-10-02 11:12:55+00:00):  Yes, I use StreetCompete to edit the maps of various countries. There is no site survey. If there are mistakes, I can undo the edits.
Edison Wen (2024-10-02 11:17:24+00:00): I would like to see if I can use StreetCompete to help various places increase their image resources and accumulate the number of countries they edit.
But I know there's no on-site survey.
Edison Wen (2024-10-02 11:26:10+00:00): For example, the Osmose problem of "Large building instruction" occurred in Macau. I used StreetCompete to correct the problem.
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-13 21:05:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159107632 where the changeset comment is: revert un-trustworthy/fictional golf mapping
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-13 21:05:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159107632 where the changeset comment is: revert un-trustworthy/fictional golf mapping
Francesco Zanaboni (2024-10-01 14:59:20+00:00): Changeset precedente: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157341216
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-13 21:05:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159107632 where the changeset comment is: revert un-trustworthy/fictional golf mapping
woodpeck_repair (2024-11-13 21:05:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159107632 where the changeset comment is: revert un-trustworthy/fictional golf mapping
VLD062 (2024-10-11 21:17:44+00:00): Hey Areesha123! It looks like you've added features to OSM using data from Google. While we appreciate your enthusiasm for mapping, it's important to note that using Google as a source is not allowed on OSM.

To ensure the accuracy and integrity of OSM map data, we rely on contributors to gather information from their own ground level survey or from publicly available sources that are free from copyright restrictions.

Unfortunately, this means that any features you've added using Google as a source will need to be removed.

For more information on what sources are acceptable for use in OSM, please check out the OSM wiki page on copyright. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright

If you have additional questions, please let me know.Thanks for your understanding!

-Jesspher
kornad (2024-10-01 19:17:45+00:00): Hej, co dokładnie jest niepoprawnego w oznaczaniu ciągów pieszo-rowerowych o wyraźnym oddzieleniu strefy pieszej od rowerowej inną nawierzchnią jako dwie osobne linie, że postanowiłeś je połączyć w jedną? Poprzedni stan rzeczy w mojej ocenie lepiej oddawał stan rzeczywisty i był spójny dla całego Gdańska (w wielu innych miastach również jest to tak mapowane). Czy te zmiany były może konsultowane na forum lub w innym gronie społeczności czy jest to jedynie Twoja interpretacja mapowania?
stasiu512 (2024-10-01 19:34:59+00:00): Cześć, ciągi te nie posiadają fizycznego rozdzielenia (kolor kostki nie jest rozdzieleniem). Mapowanie ich oddzielnie powoduje, że do utrzymania aktualności danych trzeba poprawiać dwie linie zamiast jednej.
stasiu512 (2024-10-01 19:37:47+00:00): Ref S5 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery
TrickyFoxy (2024-10-03 18:52:40+00:00): 👋 n=no 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1550178204/history/12

What did you mean?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1550178204/history/12
stasiu512 (2024-10-03 19:50:20+00:00): that's my mistake, corrected
Frans S (2024-10-11 13:49:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark about the way high rise or multi-story buildings are often mapped 
On the imagery, you see both the roof and a sidewall (with multiple floors) 
The imagery is taken under a certain degree and shows you the height of a building.
Don't map both the roof and the sidewalls as 1 building.
Draw just the rooflines as a building and move it to the building's footprint.
See this clip.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V5-bADsYiffCD9bo6l64YOdTvmKqMGry/view?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping
Đuro Jiří (2024-10-08 17:58:52+00:00): Ciao Massimo, 
secondo me, quelli parcheggi che hai aggiunto vicino a Decathlon, meglio utilizzare amenity=parking_space, invece che parking.
Max1234-ITA (2024-10-08 20:34:06+00:00): Ciao, da quanto ho capito dalla Wiki, "parking_space" è un *singolo* posto auto (vedi ad esempio questo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977456033).

Se facessi così, però, dovrei disegnare tutte le singole aree di sosta (!). 

Mettendo "parking" invece, si possono includere più posti nella stessa area. 
Formalmente non sarà bellissimo, ma almeno l'informazione sulla mappa ce l'abbiamo, e volendo migliorarla s può aggiungere il tag capacity, col numero di posti disponibili (a volte lo faccio, soprattutto in centro città)
ivanbranco (2024-10-08 20:41:53+00:00): Ciao Max,

secondo me ha ragione Duro. La stessa pagina wiki di parking_space piú avanti dice "If an area represents more than one parking space (of equal kind), use capacity=* to define the number of parking spaces it represents.", quindi il tag puó essere utilizzato per mappare piú di uno stallo. 

Inoltre se il parcheggio della Decathlon é uno, dovrebbe avere un solo elemento parking su OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element). Cosí come é ora si creano piú parcheggi annidati quando nella realtá ce n'é solo uno.
Max1234-ITA (2024-10-08 21:04:30+00:00): Uhm, si in effetti così non è il massimo. 

Ok dai, nei prossimi giorni ripasso su quell'area e vedo di dare una sistemata.

Buona mappatura a tutti! :-)
Vinber-Pro (2025-01-07 14:05:52+00:00): salut,
sur ce changeset, tu as déplacé la docteure au milieu de la route ?

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/11792903621

petit bug non ?
Vinber-Pro (2025-01-07 14:07:43+00:00): et bonne année :)
BCNorwich (2024-10-02 07:11:44+00:00): Duplicated highways and fiction bridge removed.
literan (2024-10-05 12:32:14+00:00): почему "кэКамин"? на сайте просто "Камин"

также, не надо вставлять в название слова-определения 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#%D0%98%D0%BC%D1%8F_%E2%80%93_%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B8_%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE

Исправлю
Tomasz Herud (2024-11-17 11:46:02+00:00): Hej, dlaczego uważasz, że ten pojedynczy stojak pozwala na zaparkowanie 10 rowerów? "Wielostojak" Metroroweru, który stoi obok jest zmapowany osobno.
MKLK (2024-11-17 18:02:40+00:00): Miałem na myśli parking Metroroweru. Puki co usunę ten tag i sprawdzę jak to tam rzeczywiście wygląda.
Frans S (2024-10-12 13:49:30+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
A: Inaccurate mapping.


E: Buildings not squared.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. See par 20 chapter About Buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157346810
mcliquid (2024-10-04 12:43:14+00:00): Please don't take this as criticism, but if you at least distribute the changes across states, it makes it much easier to check the changes. Thanks
NorthCrab_upload (2024-10-01 16:41:00+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1319915523

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
steak country (2024-10-17 09:53:38+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourriez-vous m'expliquer la suppression de ce chemin pourtant bien tracé et régulièrement emprunté ? Merci
kitsee (2024-10-01 18:13:14+00:00): Reverting changeset due to fictitious roads or names being added

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157351570
kitsee (2024-10-01 18:17:30+00:00): Correction on the revert message, this one was reverted because all that was changed was a solar panel was moved from a roof into a road.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-11 05:23:04+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/602209462/history has shop = trcuk that was added in this edit
shop=trcuk? Maybe shop=truck was intended? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtruck
martien-176 (2024-10-01 18:47:19+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping, you requested a review.

These are tall buildings with the sides visible. That need a special way of mapping.

1. First map the rooftop outline
2. Then move that mapping to the floor outline 

As to the tagging building=apartments: only do that if you know the local situation. If not, please use building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157348687
flohoff (2024-10-02 08:41:40+00:00): Moin,
als ich diesen changeset gesehen habe musste ich ein bisschen Schmunzeln :)

Also der Bücherschrank ist nicht indoor - aber er steht (Der node) mitten in einem Gebäude?!?

Das ist ein bisschen wiedersprüchlich ;)


Flo
Herman Lee (2024-10-01 17:13:43+00:00): comment on -> 157279997
OldManCelli (2024-10-08 11:11:38+00:00): Please note that this changeset duplicated many of the buildings you already imported a week earlier. I'm working to delete the old ones but do note that your import conflation logic is broken.
Jordi MF (2024-10-01 17:54:38+00:00): En caso de no estar de acuerdo con las correcciones, ponte en contacto con la comunidad.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157350946
martien-176 (2024-10-01 17:38:33+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Please check out these sources for more info: 
- Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
- Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157349693
DaveF (2025-12-29 20:17:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1020091492/history/2

These rail lines are not sidings. They carry freight/passenger traffic & stop to (dis)embark.
flierfy (2026-03-09 22:30:24+00:00): These tracks might not be sidings as you understand it. But they are to be marked service=sidings according to the current tagging scheme (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging).

With best regards,
Stephan
eggie (2024-10-01 20:04:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
flohoff (2024-10-02 08:40:24+00:00): Hi,
ich habe hier mal den landuse=allotments (Kleingarten) mal noch auf residential umgetagged. 

Du weisst das es im ID auch eine funktion gibt Gebäude automatisch Rechtwinkelig zu machen?

Flo
hd_m (2024-10-02 18:31:18+00:00): Hi flohoff, danke für's Überprüfen des Edits.
Ja, habe ich benutzt, mindestens bei den meisten :-)
flohoff (2024-10-03 06:42:39+00:00): Sowas mache ich immer nebenbei. Ich hab ein osmcha.org filter für Ostwestfalen und dann klicke ich da so durch und gucke mir changesets an. Kann ich nur jedem Empfehlen das wir das mehr machen und mehr kommunizieren über das was wir machen als Team.

Ach ja - Wenn du mehr mit Gebäuden machen willst würde ich die JOSM ans Herz legen. Ich habe da ein bisschen was Gebaut damit wir in NRW Gebäude mit point-and-click automatisch aus den Vektoren des Landes NRW übernehmen können.

Hatte das hier vor ein paar Wochen mal für die osm-owl liste zusammengeschrieben:

https://gt.owl.de/pipermail/osm/2024-September/005440.html

Flo
somehundred (2024-10-02 12:12:55+00:00): Vai highway=pedestrian nav pietiekami labi? Gan tas, gan area:highway=footway apzīmē vienu un to pašu.
HellMap (2024-10-02 12:47:05+00:00): Vienu un to pašu tie gluži neapzīmē. [1]

`highway=*`+`area=yes` ir plaša vieta, kur nevar noteikt celiņu "virzienu". Parasti ar to ir daudz savienojumi un faktiski pārvietošanās ir visos virzienos. Konkrēti `highway=pedestrian`+`area=yes` nāk klāt nozīme, ka tā vieta ir paredzēta cilvēkiem un parasti iekārtota ar infrastruktūru (soliņi utml.), piemēram [2]. Te var būt gan celiņi, gan veloceļi, gan pat ielas caur to. Celiņi tur var nebūt sazīmēti visos iespējamos variantos, tikai galvenie virzieni. Citiem vārdiem, tas norāda laukuma/teritorijas nozīmi (kas parasti sakrīt ar fizisko ceļa seguma izkārtojumu).

Bet `area:highway=*` norāda viena konkrēta ceļa fizisko laukumu. Celiņiem un ietvēm kā `area:highway=footway` tas ir no brauktuves/zāles/barjeras/sienas līdz otrai pusei. Šeit maršrutēšana ir tikai vienā virzienā, kas sakrīt ar pašu celiņu, kuru šis laukums apraksta. Piemēram, [3] 

`highway=pedestrian`+`area=yes` ir bieži nepareizi lietots, jo iD tikai to ilgu laiku piedāvāja, bet `area:highway=footway` ilgi nebija preset'a. Un `highway=*`+`area=yes` vai `area:highway=*` vispār viegli sajaukt, jo tā jau tāda sīka specifika.

Šajā gadījumā, es to ilgi nedomājot pārliku (tikai kontūru neizlaboju), jo tur ir tas platais celiņš/savienojums no piebraucamā līdz ietvei, [4] bet personīgi es to nenosauktu par tādu gājēju pulcēšanās vietu, vienkārši plata vieta nosegta. Citādi tādi būtu visās malās un padomju māju pagalmos tādu ir ļoti daudz. Bet, ja tu teiktu, ka te tiešām būtu vērts to apzīmēt kā "gājēju vietu", drošvien jau var arī tā. Šitādās vietās tā atšķirība saplūst kopā.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway#Differentiation_area:highway_vs._area=yes_on_a_highway https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian#Squares_and_plazas

[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13186729

[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132004617

[4] https://imgur.com/yux55FX
somehundred (2024-10-02 13:32:15+00:00): Jā, šo vietu tiešām var uzskatīt arī kā `area:highway=footway`. Tikai man jebkuru platu gājēju laukumu gribās tagot kā `highway=pedestrian` + `area=yes`, jo tad tas parādās kartē. Tad citi zin, ka tajā vietā ir kaut kāds laukums nevis tikai parasts šaurs celiņš.
richlv (2024-10-07 08:53:41+00:00): Ja tas ir pietiekami plats, lai to nevarētu uzskatīt tikai par "platāku celiņu", IMHO pieņemami ir highway=footway + area=yes .
somehundred (2024-10-07 09:01:51+00:00): Tā ir lieliska ideja! Taču iD vienmēr sūdzās, ja šādi tago.
HellMap (2024-10-07 09:24:22+00:00): Jā, kā minēju, `highway=*`+`area=yes` ir "plaša vieta", bet tikai tas arī nozīmē, ka maršrutēšana visos virzienos. Bet šitas celiņš pievienojas vienā galā piebraucamajam ceļam un otrā galā celiņiem, bet pa vidu ir vienkārši plats. Faktiski jau kustība no viena gala uz otru un es kaut kā personīgi to nesaskatītu kā tādu laukumu. Un platumu jau atzīmē parasti ar `width`. Jo citādāk jau jebkurā platā vietā varētu likta `area=yes` kaut kādam `highway=trunk` utml. Šeit nav kaut kāda dīvaina forma ar daudziem savienojumiem, tāpēc es sliektos uz `area:highway`. Kamēr nav kaut kas līdzīgs [1], es tādus parasti saskatu kā "plats celiņš" nevis "plata vieta ar celiņu". Bet nu te tā atšķirība tik maza un tik līdzīga starp visiem 3 variantiem, ka noteikti nepareizi jau laikam nav neviens.

Un jā, iD ir ielikti preseti tikai `pedestrian` un `service` ar `area=yes`, jo tie ir pieprasītākie. Agrāk to `area:highway` vispār nebija un visi bija pieraduši likt `area=yes`. To, ka iD sūdzās, var droši ignorēt. Jo vairāk un precīzāk tego, jo vairāk sastopas lietas, ko iD (pagaidām) nesaprot.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161282582
santamariense (2024-10-25 02:07:55+00:00): Olá.

Estive revisando sua edição. 
O que você quer dizer com "ser uma rua de montanha"?
Instruções de aprimoramento para https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136494470:
* Verifique o uso da tag embankment=yes, essa tag se usa normalmente para trechos de rodovias cuja base foi aterrada .
* lanes=1 significa que a via só tem uma faixa em ambos os sentidos somados. Se é uma rua comum que veículos vem e vão em ambos os sentidos, lanes=2 é o correto.

Querendo tirar dúvidas e engajar com a comunidade, sugiro os canais do Telegram listados nesta wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato

Bons mapeamentos!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157350627
ika-chan! (2024-10-07 19:55:19+00:00): Undiscussed mass reclassifications, especially with motorway junctions reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157597377
aceman444 (2024-12-02 23:27:00+00:00): Zdravim, prosim piste trochu zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn .

A preco zmena na access=unknown na brane https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/482903931 ? Cize ine formy dopravy ako tie co ste vymenovali naozaj neviete ci tam maju vjazd povoleny? Co napriklad kolobezky, kolieskove korcule, atd?