piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Romwriter (2026-07-12 10:17:24+00:00): Hallo d3d9, das Tag "note"="Klassifikation spaeter wieder aendern" stammt aus dem Jahr 2016 (Dein Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42916909). Der Aufforderung, die Klassifikation zu ändern, ist der Nutzer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Thoschi im Jahr 2020 nachgekommen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86821576). Dass er dabei die note nicht entfernt hat, halte ich für ein Versehen. Falls sich irgendwann zu einem noch nicht absehbaren Zeitpunkt die Verkehrsführung durch den Abschluss von Baumaßnahmen grundsätzlich ändert, werden wir die Straßenklassifizierung neu beurteilen wollen; das ist aber nicht, was wir hier oder irgendwo anders durch eine "note" kennzeichnen wollten. --- Inhaltlich sehe ich keinen Anhaltspunkt für highway=secondary, um eine Landesstraße handelt es sich wohl nicht, und vergleichbar hohe Verkehrsbedeutung hat die Straße zurzeit auch nicht. --- Anders wäre das zu beurteilen, wenn die Straße in absehbarer Zeit (!) wieder voraussichtlich dauerhaft Verkehrsbedeutung auf secondary-Niveau erlangt. Dafür habe ich von hier aus keine Anhaltspunkte. Beste Grüße, Romwriter
felipeeugenio (2026-04-27 12:35:14+00:00): Hola. Los potreros no tienen nombre, a lo mas el fundo, y eso se marca como place=farm + name= en el lugar donde están las casonas.

Si caso el campo pertenece a una empresa, entonces es a modo de operator.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181864670
Supaplex (2026-04-27 09:43:52+00:00): Hi SOWSUN123

我們收到別人的檢舉，提及您不願意依據實際編輯的物件撰寫摘要，例如在新北市的橋樑寫上「台北」

FYI: FYI: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

這不是被允許的行為，Data Working Group已經決定封鎖您了：https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20190

請回應相關的問題，請發送電子郵件至 data@osmfoundation.org，郵件主題為「Ticket#2026042710000278」。

並在郵件中說明您將遵守 OpenStreetMap 良好變更集註釋的規則，並回覆所有向您提問的人。
我們可以考慮您後續的進一步行動而解除封鎖。您必須答應尊循 Good Changeset comments 才會解除封鎖

Dennis Raylin Chen, Data Working Group, OpenStreetMap Foundation

data@osmfoundation.org, [Ticket#2026042710000278]
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181865121
isotopicemoting (2026-04-27 10:32:39+00:00): Hab ihn vor Ort nicht mehr gefunden und jetzt bestätigt, dass er auch nicht mehr auf der Webseite auftaucht: https://www.drk.de/hilfe-in-deutschland/existenzsichernde-hilfe/kleidercontainer/standorte
Bobropiton (2026-05-18 11:27:34+00:00): Приветствую. Ограничение маневров на дороге, которая не разделена физическим ограждением или широкой разметкой(островком) вносим через ключи change:lanes=*
Подробнее: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:change

Ваш пакет я откатил. Переделал полосы с помощью данного ключа
LordGarySugar (2026-04-27 15:04:16+00:00): Thanks for making these updates (they are clearly razed rather than abandoned) - just a note to say while you've updated railway=abandoned to railway=razed, you haven't updated abandoned:railway=rail to razed:railway=rail, which should also be updated. Or, you could just delete them entirely, nonexistent former railways should be mapped in OpenHistoricalMap instead :)
WRRyan02 (2026-05-01 18:42:08+00:00): Thank you for the information. I will update the other tags too.

I have deleted some railway sections which all visible features have been removed and are now non-existent, e.g. new building developments or earthworks.

I've changed from abandoned to razed for sections where the tracks have been removed, but general railway features remain, e.g. bridges and viaducts, cuttings, embankments etc, as per the wiki.
felipeeugenio (2026-04-27 12:26:42+00:00): Hola Nicolás. Tu changeset indica que estás mapeando con Esri, sin embargo no calza casi nada. Estoy volviendo a pegar todos los landuses que quedaron despegados.. Por favor cuidado con estas ediciones, a veces da la impresión de que las haces un poco apurado.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181865290
felipeeugenio (2026-04-27 12:28:16+00:00): Marcaste además toda un área residencial casi que de manera esquemática y totalmente innecesaria.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181865290
jptolosa (2026-05-21 02:50:51+00:00): Concuerdo en que no tiene sentido agregar ese megapolígono residential encima de una zona donde ya estaban bien delimitadas las áreas residenciales y que tampoco es 100% residencial, así que lo que mejor fue eliminarlo.
osm915 (2026-05-08 19:22:48+00:00): Hallo und danke, dass du mich in https://osm.org/note/5235395 noch auf deine Änderung hingewiesen hattest.
Ich habe noch w1345136177 mit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=182397562 nachgebessert, da er kein grade1 und auch keine Brücke ist (ich hatte das wegen dem culvert nicht direkt vor Ort geändert).
Außerdem hab ich noch ein paar von deinen motor_vehicle=agricultural;forestry entfernt, da dies in der Ecke nirgends explizit ausgeschildert ist und für die Zufahrtsbeschränkung die Info an w25516183 ausreichend sein sollte.
旧加卷 (2026-04-26 22:23:39+00:00): These elements do not appear to exist, and names should not include descriptive text.
joost schouppe (2026-04-27 08:39:05+00:00): Hi Sébastien,
You seem to use contact prefixes by default for addresses here? From what I understand of the wiki, the contact:address scheme is for when you want to add the contact address (i.e. the address at which to send letters to the operator I guess) is different from the physical address (the place you need to go to visit). That does not seem to be how you use it. I would also expect both addresses to be on the POI in those cases. I believe how you use contact:addr is wrong, that should be contact:street instead
Sébastien Pi (2026-04-27 09:12:50+00:00): Hi Joost,

I was misleaded by French usage https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:*#Addressing_scheme_in_France. In France, addr: is just used for an address POI. Other POI should have contact:* (so, if a building have many POI/things, it should have one addr: and many contact:*).

But, it is only a French usage. I discovered it right now. I will revert to addr:* since we are in Belgium here.

Thanks to let me know my mistake.
Sébastien Pi (2026-04-27 09:17:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181880642
joost schouppe (2026-04-27 10:21:56+00:00): Merci!
mcliquid (2026-04-27 07:54:54+00:00): Hi, am Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5117642 hast du sidewalk:both=no aber gleichzeitig sidewalk:right=yes eingetragen. Wie soll das interpretiert werden?
mcliquid (2026-04-27 08:00:17+00:00): Und bist du dir hier sicher mit "amenity=water_point"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7396069334
Siehe Wiki: amenity=water_point beschreibt eine Einrichtung, an der man größere Mengen an "Trinkwasser" für die Füllung eines Süßwasser-Tanks erhalten kann.

Wohnmobile dürfen gar nicht bis zum Wetterkreuz fahren, für wen ist dann die Abfüllung von großen Mengen dort bestimmt?
EinEngener (2026-04-27 20:56:08+00:00): Hi,
ich meinte eigentlich amenity=drinking_water beim Brunnen am Wetterkreuz, und beim Gehweg hab ich rechts einen und aber auf beiden seiten keinen angegeben... ich kenne die Unterkategorie in JOSM noch nicht deswegen ists wohl falsch ... 
Danke fürs erinnern
Axelos (2026-04-28 18:05:22+00:00): Rajout en effet, c’est moi qui l’ai mis à l’origine ; il s’agit plus d’une bande cyclable qu’une piste. Ça vaut peut-être le coup de savoir pourquoi celle-ci a été supprimée car la modification concerne la continuité de la rue. Je ne pense pas avoir le temps d’y aller prochainement.

Voir là : https://osm.org/changeset/180561915
iandees (2026-04-26 23:13:04+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10115332146 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181867414, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
misterfrog (2026-04-30 18:20:59+00:00): Thanks for correcting!  I've noticed this and corrected a few of them but must have missed this.  I'm trying to mitigate it by going out of edit mode when I need to move around.
MassCartog (2026-04-27 13:43:57+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Please make sure not to remove paths that exist on the ground, even if they are illegal/fall on Private property. That is valid OSM data and should not be removed. Please use the Access tagging system instead. 

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F
eggie (2026-04-27 06:11:08+00:00): 'Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.. Alle begin is moeilijk. 
Deze tags zijn niet valide. 
Ik heb de info verplaatst naar de al bestaande adresnode en er een club_home tag op gezet. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-04-27 06:41:00+00:00): Volgens de website heeft dit niet een Engelse naam. Ik heb het aangepast naar Restaurant De Gagel.
dpolovinkin (2026-07-12 12:55:05+00:00): also has to be reverted, it's not okay to ignore so many warnings
NorthCrab_upload (2026-04-26 23:54:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1504245766

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mapikids (2026-04-27 00:27:32+00:00): Initially, the online editor didn't suggest the street name I had in the dropdown menu, which is usually correct. I thought it was a glitch, so I preferred to leave it blank rather than force a street name.
Mapikids (2026-04-27 00:27:56+00:00): Solved now. Thank you.
LordGarySugar (2026-05-13 17:05:54+00:00): I have reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182611888 : you should improve what is already mapped rather than deleting en-masse like this
Amany_Ahmed (2026-04-28 13:45:12+00:00): Hello Iahaia Amisse,
Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap
Your recent edits contain multiple unconnected nodes without any physical tags.
This type of data is not considered valid in OpenStreetMap and may affect overall data quality.
Please stop adding such nodes and review your editing to revert your changes.

Thank you.
Amany Ahmed
Iahaia Amisse (2026-04-28 19:36:38+00:00): Hello Amany!
Thank you very much for your feedback, 
I have already made the necessary correction!

Sincerely!
Amany_Ahmed (2026-04-29 07:55:48+00:00): Thank you for addressing the issue so promptly. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Amany_Ahmed (2026-04-28 13:43:40+00:00): Hello Iahaia Amisse,
Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap
Your recent edits contain multiple unconnected nodes without any physical tags.
This type of data is not considered valid in OpenStreetMap and may affect overall data quality. 
Please stop adding such nodes and review your editing to revert your changes.

Thank you.
Amany Ahmed
ajmat (2026-04-27 06:05:53+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id: 181873872
eggie (2026-04-27 06:14:51+00:00): Je hebt hier twee vijvers op elkaar getekend. Het lijkt me niet correct. Ik heb er één verwijderd. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-27 06:47:20+00:00): Heeft dit hier werkelijk een Engelse naam?
eggie (2026-04-27 06:17:37+00:00): Chloe.. De school en kinderopvang stonden al op de kaart. Ik heb de info verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-27 06:28:24+00:00): Long cycle path that runs through Waalre.
Dat fietspad ligt er toch gewoon al?
Geef aan wat je hebt gedaan svp.

Je hebt wat tags aangepast die heb ik teruggezet.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-27 06:33:01+00:00): Dag Chloe.. Hier heb je enorme schade veroorzaakt door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Dus niet schuiven en steeds controleren wat je hebt gedaan.
Je edits.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=181868102

MVG
eggie
eggie (2026-04-27 06:36:43+00:00): reverted by changeset #181874799 

Adresnodes en wegen teruggezet waar ze horen.
MVG
eggie
trigpoint (2026-04-27 10:25:58+00:00): Hello beatpoet.
Phil from the Data Working Group here. Whilst OSM is a map of the world as it exists now, not as it may be in the future meaning adding proposed features is controversial, copying from copyright documents is not ok 
The proposed development you have added links to a planning document with a crown copyright map. For the avoidance of doubt this is absolutely not allowed.

Cheers Phil
mcliquid (2026-04-27 07:52:52+00:00): Hi, bist du dir hier sicher?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1360570266

Ich bin erst gestern von Grasbeuren nach Ittendorf auf der K 7782 gefahren und konnte dort keinen Radweg auf der linken Seite sehen.
mcliquid (2026-04-27 17:47:49+00:00): Vielleicht hast du den hier verwechselt? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1360567345

Ich bin's gerade nochmal abgefahren, dort gibt es noch keinen Radweg: https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/#focus=pic&pic=355222b6-8599-4cda-af70-610e825b3045

Ich habe es wieder zurück auf proposed gesetzt, das Landratsamt informiert schriftlich, wenn es hier los geht :)
EinEngener (2026-04-27 20:48:40+00:00): Danke dir 
Habe es tatsächlich verwechselt
Herwescheluc (2026-04-27 17:14:45+00:00): Hallo, Daneel76,

die Fußgängerzone in der Bahnhofstraße ist jetzt unterirdisch (layer=-1)? Das wäre mir neu...

Ergänz doch bitte auch die Zugangsregelung für psv und bicycle, wie auf dem linearen Weg -  oder soll ich das machen?

Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
ZLima12 (2026-05-20 04:52:32+00:00): Hi, "Christopher Columbus Highway Local Roadway" is not an acceptable name per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
cubbe8 (2026-05-20 05:24:00+00:00): Then what do you suggest it be tagged as?
aceman444 (2026-06-14 12:05:33+00:00): Zdravim, preco duplikacia celeho depa Krasnany aj na budovu, ked uz je tak oznaceny cely areal?
Aha, zrejme nejaka zamena, lebo ste budovu zmenili na znacku landuse=industrial  (uz to po Vas niekto opravil). Takze presuniem ak nieco treba na cely areal (landuse) a bude to dobre. Taktiez layer=1 je dost nezmysel, nad cim akoze ta budova mala byt?
kimo (2026-07-02 01:11:19+00:00): Are the McConnell Dowell Rail Plant lines really 1000mm gauge? Or they actually a mix of 1435mm and 1600mm gauge?
LachlanTansey2009 (2026-07-06 19:16:35+00:00): This is my bad, all sidings in the plant are 1600mm broad gauge
kimo (2026-07-10 05:53:57+00:00): Thanks for updating them.
iandees (2026-04-27 02:55:38+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3239244035 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181870582, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Dave Laird (2026-05-18 20:50:37+00:00): Hi Danny. It looks like you've added a bicycle = yes tag to the sidewalk next to Sanwood Boulevard and Tom Wells Crescent. In Toronto, bicycles are prohibited from using sidewalks unless you are a child with wheels below a certain diameter. Was this tag just an accident?
Dave Laird (2026-05-27 04:05:26+00:00): Haven't heard back from you, so I'm going to remove the bicycle = yes tag. LMK if you know a reason why it should remain.
b-jazz (2026-05-09 05:00:44+00:00): FYI, the ways that mark the golf hole have a direction to them and go from the tee to the green. I've fixed the ones on this course, but wanted to let you know for any future mapping you might do.
lbilldt (2026-05-09 15:26:21+00:00): B-Jazz, thanks for the info and the update. i typically, copy/paste other golf features that have already been mapped in an attempt to preserve tagging and other formats. I tried to flip the hole direction when it was pointing the opposite way, etc. I didn't see a way to tell which way it points, but when looking closer i see an arrow if you are trying to add another point to the line. I'll re-check these, thanks for the updates!
b-jazz (2026-05-09 15:40:06+00:00): Yeah, the iD editor isn't always the easiest to see what is going on. If you do a lot with relations/multipolygons, you'll have an even harder time. If you are going to get serious about golf course mapping, you might want to look in JOSM.
Comino (2026-04-28 07:03:27+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
Foonline (2026-04-27 14:28:00+00:00): danke
b-jazz (2026-04-28 19:15:02+00:00): RE: http://osm.org/way/1504288758

When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outlines shouldn't cross over greens or bunkers or other fairways for example. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Golf.png for an example of the "Wrong" way to map a fairway and a green, along with the correct way. There are some cases where a fringe exists around a green and you should draw the fairway outline completely around a green, leaving room for the fringe. Other times, the fairway and green butt up against each other. In that case the fairway and green should share the same nodes at the boundary between the two, and every node at the boundary needs to be shared, leaving no gaps. When drawing these shared nodes, editors like iD (built into openstreetmap.org) will "snap" to an existing node if you get close enough. If you have any questions about golf course mapping, feel free to reach out. Thanks.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-04-27 05:31:30+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20188
angys (2026-04-29 16:43:55+00:00): Hi, for the bus stop like Psrn Suadamai, the place for network should be either MRT feeder or Smart Selangor, the route code should be at other field, see more at

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bus_routes_in_Klang_Valley
Wally_PL (2026-04-28 13:38:22+00:00): Mocne słowa jak na kogoś, kto jest maperem od… 3 dni.
ZgolBoi (2026-04-28 14:27:42+00:00): wiesz że istnieje coś takiego jak samouczek? Tam jest o zaokrąglaniu.
mavl (2026-06-07 06:02:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:48:56+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184131001

https://osm.org/changeset/184131001
CRCulver (2026-05-03 09:27:22+00:00): Why did you remove the surface= tag from this way? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173981426

If the surface is no longer gravel, as it was in the preceding version, then you should have updated the tag instead of deleting it.
rempshaener (2026-07-05 19:59:36+00:00): Hallo,
hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185047221 wird in Frage gestellt, ob der Weg existiert.
Vielleicht möchtest du dich an der Diskussion beteiligen.
Viele Grüße
MappingMore (2026-04-28 04:14:20+00:00): Partially Revert of 181828572
MappingMore (2026-05-02 06:15:16+00:00): Revert of 181858613
MappingMore (2026-04-27 11:32:32+00:00): Revert of 181857953
bxl-forever (2026-05-11 09:58:39+00:00): Bonjour,

C’est quoi « les données satellites de earth »  Google Earth ?
TommyEnglish (2026-05-11 13:22:38+00:00): Oui, c'est les données de Google Earth
TommyEnglish (2026-05-11 13:28:48+00:00): Et il y a bien un observatoire pour les oiseaux sur place.
mueschel (2026-04-30 08:14:59+00:00): Hi,
could you check your maxspeed tags? They should read 
"maxspeed:hgv:forward" instead of "maxspeed:forward:hgv". I.e. the type of vehicle comes before the direction on the road.

Thanks!
StachuMMV (2026-06-26 21:24:39+00:00): Hi, in free time I'm gonna correct this.
Romwriter (2026-04-27 19:02:25+00:00): Hello JJ_P, Thank you for your contribution to Openstreetmap! I have amended the tagging, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181906889, as "tunnel" is a key for covered roads that are closed along both sides of the way, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel Best regards, Romwriter
JJ_P (2026-04-29 06:59:23+00:00): Hello, Romwriter! I understand your actions, but I want to mark the road as being under the bridge. Can I mark it as layer=-1, for example, as far as I understand from the osm wiki, it is suitable for such intersecting objects. Thank you!
aTarom (2026-04-27 08:48:19+00:00): Hola, quan pugueu revisa si he arreglat bé l'horari, en copiar i enganxar directament s'han introduït caràcters rars, a part del format.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6643003703/history
Salutacions.
eggie (2026-04-27 09:00:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
FroschForscher (2026-04-28 15:16:44+00:00): Hmm, ohne `noname=yes` fragt StreetComplete wieder nach dem Namen. Hab's mal hinzugefügt.
rigilk3nt (2026-04-29 07:42:26+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis mit noname. Ich bin gerade am experimentieren, wie man die Ansage von Osten kommend in Richtung Wengengasse verbessert. Bisher heißt es da "links abbiegen auf Olgastraße".
rarad74 (2026-04-27 20:16:46+00:00): REVERT pana o sa crapi!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-21 00:04:20+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184371829

https://osm.org/changeset/184371829
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
ajmat (2026-04-28 06:50:25+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 181923522
hlfan (2026-04-28 04:28:40+00:00): Wie schaut's mit w1497487891 aus? Erscheint mir nicht schlüssig, dass da noch gearbeitet wird.
Darnight14 (2026-04-27 08:56:31+00:00): 上街村→上村
iandees (2026-04-27 14:00:33+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3306424394 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181892595, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!