piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2024-03-23 09:44:45+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I see that you added many tags like these:

edificio progettato = si
elementi identitari = /
servizi presenti = Bar
stato edificio = Buono
tipo di copertura = Piano
valore storico = no

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.

If you have questions, please feel free to ask in the forums!

PS: It looks like you're working in a group with other mappers. Please point your supervisor / group leader to our organized editing guidelines:
https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
tttnnn24 (2024-03-22 14:19:49+00:00): Westerhoven oost van de Heuvel
VLD549 (2024-07-26 11:25:56+00:00): Hi, both BAG and Bing Maps show it to be Hoefakkers. Could you provide a link of some sort that shows the name change from Hoefakkers to Hoefakkershof?

Thank you in advance!
tttnnn24 (2024-07-27 11:19:53+00:00): Thank you. Definitely wrong streetnames, also on Hoefijzer.

Upgated. This strech needs more attention; bad allignment
VLD549 (2024-08-29 14:03:43+00:00): Thank you for the response. Happy mapping!
HellMap (2024-03-22 19:02:33+00:00): Sveiki,

Ar šo "ēku" laikam domāts kaut kas cits bija?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1265185336 Ortofoto gan tur dažādas lietas, tāpēc nezinu uz ko īsti izlabot.
HellMap (2024-03-22 19:05:48+00:00): Vēl šī truba https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625542376 nevarēs būt `location=overground`, jo tas nozīmētu, ka tā ir pa virsu ielām. Tu laikam domāji kaut kādu konkrētu posmu nomainīt?
Reinis Bērziņš (2024-03-22 20:01:02+00:00): Paldies! Abas bija kļūmes. Izlaboju uz landuse=garages (gribēju ietagot tikai ēkas, bet nejauši nomainīju tagu visai teritorijai) un location=overhead (jā, sajaucu overhead un overground vietām).
wolfgang8 (2024-03-22 14:32:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149016450
NeisBot (2024-03-24 12:40:41+00:00): Hello H2000H, thank you very much for your contribution to the OSM project.

It would be great if you could use the comment field to describe your changes. This makes it easier for others to understand and follow your adjustments on the map more quickly.Please see https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments \n
Thanks!

#HappyMapping
#ADescriptionSaysMoreThanASingleChar
H2000H (2024-03-24 18:54:27+00:00): Okay, next time I'll be sure to comment on the changes

, Thanks
pitscheplatsch (2024-03-24 19:17:49+00:00): Thanks for your answer!
eggie (2024-03-22 15:12:39+00:00): Tip  Je hoeft geen mp's te maken als je niets hebt als vlak om in te sluiten.
Solitaire bomen zijn prima.
MVG
eggie
Alida66 (2024-03-26 19:33:51+00:00): Wat late reactie Eggie, maar wat bedoel je hier met mp's?
Groet, Alma
eggie (2024-03-26 19:41:39+00:00): Hier wat leesvoer over multipolygonen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Multipolygon_Examples

Die gebruik je bv om een vlak water of gras in te sluiten in een bos. Ander zie je alles door elkaar.
Wanneer je een enkel vlak maakt hoef je niets in te sluiten.

Dat je een MP hebt gemaakt kun je hier onder zien Je krijgt dan een relatie.
Groet..
eggie
eggie (2024-03-26 19:43:20+00:00): De onnodige relatie

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17372914

Veel kwaad kan het niet... wellicht per abuis aangemaakt?
eggie (2024-03-26 19:49:50+00:00): Je verwijdert gewoon de relatie en dan tag je daarna landuse=grass op her vlak.
Alida66 (2024-03-26 20:08:52+00:00): Mp's had ik gelezen; al eerder ergens door vlakken vervangen. 
Relatie verwijderen: weet niet hoe, maar mp weg en vlak voor in de plaats.
eggie (2024-03-26 20:23:09+00:00): De 2 zijvlakken heb ik nu ook ontdaan van de mps's met 1 lid. 
En gewoon natural=shrubbery getagd. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2024-03-26 20:23:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17372913
eggie (2024-03-26 20:25:38+00:00): en van de zuidkant idem.
SpinOff (2024-03-22 18:11:22+00:00): Hej. Obecny zestaw tagów nie jest wystarczający do opisania tego miejsca. Czym są "Budy"?
eggie (2024-03-22 15:00:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Ik heb access=private toegevoegd en er een oprijlaan van gemaakt.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
os-emmer (2024-03-22 19:29:31+00:00): Hello stan1sław,

you used emergency=disaster_response twice for one spot:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11753121194
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/644351782
Are these realy two seperate stations or is it only one station? For me it looks like one big area including a fire station and a disaster response station. In that case only the station should be labeled with emergency=disaster_response. See here for details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

You used wikidata=* and wikipedia=* on both objects with the same content. I think these should be changed to operator:wikidata=* and operator:wikipedia=*, as the wikidata and wikipedia pages descibe the operating organisation and not the place itself. Can you check if my guesses are right? I do not know the place so maybe you know more than me.

Thanks for contributing to OSM!
stan1zlaw (2024-03-25 11:42:34+00:00): Hi os-emmer,

Thanks for the heads up. In fact only the complex should be mapped with emergency=disaster_response and not the building.
Regarding operator tags I've been using iD to autoload operator related tags and I might've messed up somewhere in my last edits, they should be operator:wikidata=* like on the Australian guidelines in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Emergency_Services .
I'll fix it today together with my previous edits. Thank you.
ivanbranco (2024-03-23 14:00:46+00:00): Ciao Ingrid Rega, questo e altri tuoi changeset sono stati annullati per ripristinare la situazione precedente. La motivazione é che le linee guida per gli import ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ) e quelle per le modifiche di gruppo ( https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines ) non sono state rispettate. Per favore seguite le linee guida prima di procedere con ulteriori modifiche.
Ingrid Rega (2024-03-23 14:29:36+00:00): ciao,  hai annullato tutte le modifiche che io e i miei colleghi stavamo facendo per procedere a degli elaborati per un esame universitario, ti ringrazio davvero :)
ivanbranco (2024-03-23 14:37:56+00:00): OpenStreetMap é un progetto comunitario con delle regole da rispettare, tra cui: https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Se volete utilizzare OSM come base dati per un progetto universitario senza sottostare a queste regole vi consiglio https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/it/
eggie (2024-03-22 15:14:24+00:00): Voorheen gebruikten we wel veel natural=scrub
Helaas rendert shrubbery niet op de standaarkaart. Beslissing van Carto.

MVG
eggie
Alida66 (2024-03-26 19:40:04+00:00): Ja, maar scrub is het idd niet. Zag hele discussies en Carto wordt niet zo serieus genomen? Zag dus uiteindelijk ergens shrubbery gebruikt, dus toen dat maar (en village green meestal afgekeurd). Is ook niets anders voor, toch? De sleutelbloemen die nu shrubbery zijn vind ik ook nog steeds raar.
Groet, Alma
eggie (2024-03-26 19:44:52+00:00): Het is wat het is... Je niet blind staren op de standaardkaart.
tekim (2024-03-23 19:14:31+00:00): Hello again, It looks like this changeset also used Google Street View, which is not allowed.
michel60 (2024-03-25 15:43:25+00:00): Bonjour,
Report de mes outils sur le wiki pour la mise à jour des lignes de bus:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France:Eure/Transports_en_commun
- Une carte généré par Overpass Turbo
- Un lien "Voir" pour une vue graphique des lignes
- Cliquer sur le lien "GEOFABRIK OSM Inspector" pour voir les lignes en erreur (les lignes en noir sont en erreur)
Cordialement Michel
Frans S (2024-03-22 15:56:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark about mapping highways
How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.
In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)
In JOSM, use the measure tab, or draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (remove the circle after that)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.
Argbjorn (2024-09-09 08:43:01+00:00): Hi, moszkva ter! Why did you change tags back to the place=village? Doesn't amenity=refugee_site better describe this place? There's no a separate settlement with name 'წეროვნის დევნილთა დასახლება' in the Georgian cadastre.
opendcc (2025-05-31 07:29:27+00:00): Hallo, bitte Feldwege mit wassergebundener Oberfläche nicht als grade1 taggen - ich bin da gestern mit dem Rennrad richtig reingefallen.
MK2705 (2025-05-31 09:12:58+00:00): Servus, danke für den Kommentar!
War das dieser Weg? Das war der einzige, den ich als grade1 getaggt hatte:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1265204505
opendcc (2025-05-31 15:27:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1265204533
MK2705 (2025-05-31 17:36:29+00:00): Vielen Dank - ja, da stimme ich dir voll und ganz zu, der ist mir durchgerutscht!
SpinOff (2024-03-22 18:04:38+00:00): Czy wyraz "n/ż" jest częścią oficjalnej nazwy przystanku? Zazwyczaj przystanki na żądanie są określone tylko dla konkretnych linii autobusowych
dadavid (2024-04-16 11:36:12+00:00): Hi, 
danke, dass du hier eingetragen hast, dass der Shop geschlossen wurde. Du kannst dafür entweder aus dem damaligen shop=antiques ein disused:shop=antiques machen (so habe ichs jetzt gemacht) oder ein shop=vacant eintragen. in jedem Fall wird aus name=* dann old_name=*
Siehe dazu auch das Wiki osm.org/wiki/DE:Lebenszyklus-Pr%C3%A4fix

Mapping von POIs wie diesen Geschäften kannst du relativ einfach auch unterwegs zum Beispiel über die OSM Editor App "Everydoor" machen, oder auch z.B. GoMap oder StreetComplete. 

Grüße und weiterhin viel Spass beim Mapping
David
Tomas_J (2024-03-31 14:49:32+00:00): Tábor který jste smazal existuje - ověřeno v terénu. Proc je mazete s komentárem "oprava"? Pokud je nelegální , je potřeba správně otagovat a ne mazat. Z mojeho pohledu jde spíš o vandalismus než o opravu.
tekim (2024-03-23 19:12:14+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).  Thanks for editing the map.  Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use Google Street View when editing OSM due to Google's terms of use. I look forward to seeing other edits from you (of course using acceptable sources).
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 05:56:02+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164841193
iandees (2024-03-22 16:41:16+00:00): Reverting delete + remap instead of improving existing data

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149022069
Tomas_J (2024-03-31 14:50:24+00:00): Tábor který jste smazal existuje - ověřeno v terénu. Proc je mazete s komentárem "oprava"? Z mojeho pohledu jde spíš o vandalismus než o opravu.
Tomas_J (2024-03-31 14:50:54+00:00): Tábor který jste smazal existuje - ověřeno v terénu. Proc je mazete s komentárem "oprava"? Z mojeho pohledu jde spíš o vandalismus než o opravu.
Tomas_J (2024-03-31 14:46:58+00:00): Tábor který jste smazal existuje. Proc je mazete s komentárem "oprava"? Z meno pohledu jde spíš o vandalismus než o opravu.
Tomas_J (2024-03-31 14:48:07+00:00): Tábor který jste smazal existuje - ověřeno v terénu. Proc je mazete s komentárem "oprava"? Z mojeho pohledu jde spíš o vandalismus než o opravu.
Tomas_J (2024-03-31 14:52:05+00:00): Tábor který jste smazal existuje - ověřeno v terénu. Proc je mazete s komentárem "oprava"? Z mojeho pohledu jde spíš o vandalismus než o opravu.
Tomas_J (2024-03-31 14:50:00+00:00): Tábor který jste smazal existuje - ověřeno v terénu. Proc je mazete s komentárem "oprava"? Z mojeho pohledu jde spíš o vandalismus než o opravu.
literan (2024-03-23 11:37:50+00:00): вы снова отрисовываете здание, которого нет на местности (на снимках Esri). Зачем вы это делаете?

в этом месте лежат контейнеры
Михаил 1995 (2024-03-23 11:46:20+00:00): Подождите, я подумал это что-то типа гаражей. Разве это нарушение? Не понял
Михаил 1995 (2024-03-23 11:48:05+00:00): Если нарушение, то откачу правку, конечно
literan (2024-03-23 11:56:19+00:00): это контейнеры. Не откатывайте, я уже исправляю
Михаил 1995 (2024-03-23 11:59:47+00:00): Я вас понял, спасибо
tekim (2024-03-23 19:08:19+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).  Thanks for editing the map.  Unfortunately, when editing OSM we are not allowed to use Google Street View due to Google's terms of use.  I look forward to seeing more edits from you (of course based on sources that we are allowed to use).
HildenerGS (2024-03-24 18:51:03+00:00): Good to know, thanks!
SpinOff (2024-03-22 18:08:40+00:00): Hej. Chciałbym się upewnić że prawidłowo użyłeś tagu ref do oznaczenia numeru drogi. Czy w terenie są znaki informujące o jej numerze?
eggie (2024-03-22 16:38:00+00:00): Daniel  De adresnode heb ik verwijderd. Het is geen BAG adres. 
Groet
eggie
mp747474 (2024-03-22 18:18:00+00:00): nein, das war vorher richtig. Revert.
ivanbranco (2024-03-23 13:46:52+00:00): Ciao Filippo997, questo e altri tuoi changeset sono stati annullati per ripristinare la situazione precedente. La motivazione é che le linee guida per gli import ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ) e quelle per le modifiche di gruppo ( https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines ) non sono state rispettate. Per favore seguite le linee guida prima di procedere con ulteriori modifiche.
Frans S (2024-03-23 10:47:53+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
During my validation reviews I noticed that traces of highways are regulary wrong tagged.

How to decide when a trace is a path or an unclassified highway (main choices in rural areas)
First, look what they connect.  Houses, settlements, villages. Then measure the width of that trace.

In iDeditor 

Shortcut : Ctrl+⇧ Shift+M – toggle  opens measurement panel
Draw a line between the shoulders of a trace (zoom in very far) and read the distance.
If a trace is max 2 meters wide, tag it as a path.
Wider and connect hamlets, houses and villages should be tagged as unclassified.
Tag residential in urban areas (villages, towns)

In JOSM, use the measure tab or, draw a circle (round building, shortcut Alt-Z when the building plugin is installed)) between the shoulders of a trace and read the distance on the lower toolbar. (don't map that bulding)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
This is mentioned about tracks on the
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#Routing_considerations

Quote: Tracks are roads of agricultural purpose. They usually connect fields to farms. The surface sometimes makes them inaccessible for regular cars, or at least limits the speeds to a very slow pace. Tracks should always be avoided for through-going traffic or within urban areas.

Best regards
woodpeck (2024-03-24 10:05:41+00:00): You deleted over 20 ways in this changeset, among them the whole of Penland Island, Brown Island, and Gibby Island. Please fix these problems or ask for help if you cannot do it yourself.
rabbit042 (2024-03-24 11:38:59+00:00): Yes of course.  I have already finished the body of Chatuge Lake and I am working on the islands trying to get the relationship right.
mp747474 (2024-03-22 18:32:35+00:00): Hallo, ein Geschäft markiert man nicht als geschlossen, indem man "dauerhaft geschlossen" in den Namen reinschreibt, sondern man löscht den Punkt (Mülleimer-Symbol). Das übernehme ich für dieses Mal, nur eine Anmerkung für die Zukunft.
mavl (2024-11-13 07:58:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159079753 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
eggie (2024-03-22 17:55:25+00:00): Dag dnl..  Je.kunt gewoon de niet BAG adresnode verwijderen.
Mvg
eggie
dnl12 (2024-03-22 17:57:03+00:00): Bedankt, had het over het hoofd gezien. Wat is trouwens een correcte manier om meerdere winkels op één adres toe te voegen.  Bijvoorbeeld als een Plus ook een DHL of PostNL punt heeft of als er meerdere winkels op één adres gevestigd zijn (shop-in-shop)
eggie (2024-03-22 18:00:47+00:00): Voor meerdere winkels op éen adres is geen goede oplossing.
Dan gewoon schipperen. Dan maar meer adresse.. of zelfs die adressen weglaten.
Het bag adres is immers vindbaar.
Er zijn wel mappers geweest die dan zo n keten in een relatie zetten. 
Groet
eggie
literan (2024-03-23 11:35:56+00:00): не надо рисовать уже снесенные здания, которых нет на снимках
Grimson (2024-03-22 17:25:52+00:00): Hi, just visited Arnhem and wanted to look for nice coffee shops. Noticed that the previous tenant was 'Bonnie' as named on openstreetmaps but the current tenant is 'Prut'. Walked by the shop and could confirm the new tenant is Prut.
SomeoneElse (2024-03-23 11:01:57+00:00): This is another example where it would have been nice to know that it was happening.  I've commented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/fix_many_obvious_typos in case that route works; many comments at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3199858 don't seem to be acknowledged; perhaps you're not reading mails from that account?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-23 19:31:49+00:00): > many comments at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3199858 don't seem to be acknowledged; perhaps you're not reading mails from that account?

I am processing this emails (that is how I found this comment).

And actually it may make to sense to not start/pause bot edits as long as there are not answered changeset comment.

Is there some way to get it in machine readable way? Getting changeset database dump would be (1) annoying to process (2) done with significant delay
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-23 19:33:00+00:00): (for completeness - API calls iterating over all changesets ever made by bot would be really silly)

hmm, how https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3199858 updates their data? Is there some stream of changeset comments?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-23 19:33:43+00:00): > don't seem to be acknowledged

I bookmarked this page though I will not process all of them today. I will process them before running more bot edits.
SomeoneElse (2024-03-23 19:38:24+00:00): There is a feed of changeset comments (and other comments); ChangesetMD can read that.
It might be easier just to process mails as they come in to though - assuming you can receive it on a machine you control?
Road–Runner (2024-03-22 22:02:15+00:00): Hello. The piste difficulty here was edited multiple times from intermediate to easy and vice versa. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368372556/history.

So is it really easy? Which source did you use for your edit?
vojtechzaboril (2024-03-23 06:18:49+00:00): Hi, I used the current map of the ski areal.
V
SomeoneElse (2024-03-23 11:07:21+00:00): Please "engage brain" when making these changes.
You've changed "craft=joinery" to "craft=joiner" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2659961527 but have left the tag "joinery=doors".  This is exactly the sort of issue that I raised with you on https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/139677537 just two months ago.  I would have hoped that errors that you acknowledged then would have been avoided in future changes.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-26 15:23:50+00:00): I will investigate such orphaned cascading tags and fix them. 

And include automated steps to ensure it is entirely impossible for it to happen in this type of edit using this specific part of library. And will attempt to avoid it happening in other kind of edits.

Sorry for not realising that it is potentially larger problem, I will try to not repeat this issue.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-17 13:46:18+00:00): "I will investigate such orphaned cascading tags and fix them."

fixed, done it in general - not only with tags I edited 

If you see any missed - please let me know
emvee (2025-08-20 18:28:00+00:00): Geen Geldmaat, enig idee wie de operator is?
JeroenHoek (2025-08-20 18:42:47+00:00): Geen idee. Ik zal kijken of hij er nog is nu het pand leeg staat, maar recent was hij er nog wel.
emvee (2025-08-23 06:07:11+00:00): 👍
mcliquid (2024-03-23 15:37:58+00:00): come on, do you even read my comments here? Please stop spreading your changes across the entire European continent!
VARVAR8 (2024-03-25 16:16:17+00:00): I'm sorry, but OSMOSE gave me a list of errors. The changes were made mainly on the territory of Ukraine, and there were several changes in Spain (and not all over Europe, as you describe). In the future, I will try to group corrections separately to avoid such errors. I apologize for the moral suffering caused by my changes. Happy mapping!
mcliquid (2024-03-25 16:25:20+00:00): How generous of you to sacrifice some of your valuable time to reply after more than five days.
See the orange frame to the right of this comment? Do you see how big it is? That's what I meant by surrounding the whole of Europe.
I hope you don't suffer any health problems as a result of adapting your working behaviour. All the best to you and enjoy mapping!
SomeoneElse (2024-03-29 10:40:16+00:00): Hello VARVAR8,
If "OSMOSE gave you a list of errors" please do NOT change data because of what it says.  As Osmose's website https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr makes very clear: "In no case Osmose-QA should provide you the absolute right way to map, always keep a critical eye".
Your poor quality mapping has caused many people (including the DWG) considerable amount of work in the past.
Can you please explain in more detail what changes you made in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149024785 and why you made those changes?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
VARVAR8 (2024-03-29 14:10:00+00:00): Yes of course. in this changeset I adjusted road intersections with buildings and rivers/streams, added bridges, culverts, roads in western Ukraine as well as southern Spain. I made a fix with objects that I edited earlier and for which the validator (OSMOSE) gave errors according to my authorship.
Andy, can't you as a DWG admin not see this? I think I answered all your questions?
Best Regards.
SomeoneElse (2024-03-29 14:18:57+00:00): I can only see what you have written here :)
Were the edits to bridges etc. made after survey, or with aerial imagery, or something else?
VARVAR8 (2024-03-29 17:22:53+00:00): I specify this in the SOURCE column of the changeset. In this case - MAXAR aerial photo. 
Offset - Strava GPS.
mcliquid (2024-03-23 07:58:10+00:00): Hi,

please note: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
sbre (2024-03-23 09:11:19+00:00): @mcliquid The large bounding box is in this case a result of touching the gigantic "UTC+02:00" relation