piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
iandees (2026-04-27 21:41:55+00:00): Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1672987978, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3810971824, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3810972094 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181912329, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
rajdhani (2026-04-28 09:35:00+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181930258
ajmat (2026-04-28 11:46:27+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 181935731
eggie (2026-04-28 06:24:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Er zijn nu twee bars toegevoegd. Ik zal er een verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
ceirios (2026-04-27 21:11:41+00:00): Hi there,

What's your source for this please?

Diolch
Ceirios
dpolovinkin (2026-07-12 12:46:30+00:00): huge number of ignored alerts like this is also unacceptable, reverted this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185589640

PLEASE BE CAREFUL, DON'T IGNORE ALERTS, this is not the only changeset with issues like from you
dpolovinkin (2026-07-12 12:44:54+00:00): huge number of ignored alerts like this is unacceptable, reverted this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185589543
theDM (2026-04-28 00:11:51+00:00): Jeżeli rzeczywiście tamtędy odprawiają samochody osobowe i autokary do Polski, to powinniśmy też zmienić trasy tras autokarowych międzynarodowych.
Znalazłem więcej zdjęć z terminala autostradowego:
https://www.dreamstime.com/korczowa-krakovets-land-border-crossing-ukraine-poland-international-checkpoint-krakowiec-korchow-lviv-region-image175853873
https://www.ukrainetravelnews.com/korczowa-krakowiec-border-crossing-point-now-open/
https://intermodalnews.eu/2022/06/22/ukraine-enhances-border-infrastructure/
ZgolBoi (2026-04-28 15:12:38+00:00): a jak to zrobić? jestem tu nowy
Glassman (2026-04-29 00:05:57+00:00): You may want to research the wiki for tagging dirt bikes (motorcycle) See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access. Also be aware, many of the trails in the state do not allow motorized vehicles with some exceptions. You can also join our Slack, which I'll send you more info on, to ask the best way to tag for dirt bikes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181912073
Tatfahren (2026-05-09 10:24:07+00:00): Hallo Naturism,
ich frage mich wie man in das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30952072 kommt. Vorne hast du die Eingänge gelöscht, das kann natürlich sein wenn das Gebäude renoviert wurde, und diese jetzt nach hinten verlegt wurden. Hinten hast du jedoch den Weg gelöscht, sodass es hinten scheinbar auch keinen Zugang gibt.

Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467187904/history hast du "bicycle=yes" hinzugefügt. Bist du sicher das dort ein "Fahrrad frei" steht?, daneben ist nämlich laut Luftbild ein Radfahrstreifen an der Straße.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181912177
tntchn (2026-04-27 21:48:17+00:00): 把這邊做一下整理：那個城門是從西邊搬過來的小西門（靖波門），目前沒聽過是公告古蹟，古蹟的部份是旁邊看起來很破的城牆，他們只是刻意把搬過來的門放在這個位置而已。門和城牆有各自的維基百科及數據項目。
iandees (2026-04-27 22:05:23+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/409662623 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181912966, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
heretofore (2026-07-06 00:20:07+00:00): You can go under the Randolph bridge now? What's the trail like? Mainly rideable or bushwhacking?
eerib (2026-04-30 01:57:49+00:00): Reverted in full by CS#182013120

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182013120

Reason: User has added several dozen fake trails in a mass vandalism attempt.
eerib (2026-04-30 01:57:55+00:00): Reverted in full by CS#182013120

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182013120

Reason: User has added several dozen fake trails in a mass vandalism attempt.
cubbe8 (2026-04-28 00:49:42+00:00): When did you survey this? Pilgrim between Crossover and Deaconess was just converted to one way for the ongoing construction.
StreetSurveyor (2026-04-28 01:11:30+00:00): Surveyed today while running. I did my best to capture the one-way changes, but the ongoing construction made it a bit confusing—happy to take another look if something’s off.
LordGarySugar (2026-06-16 22:24:32+00:00): Hi, I noticed you modified the give way sign here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1547130153, you have placed the highway=give_way tag on a node that is the intersection of three directions, so it's not clear which direction the sign applies to. The correct approach would be to have the sign shortly before the junction, facing the way the sign faces. Thanks.
LordGarySugar (2026-05-13 17:07:19+00:00): I have reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182612017 : you should improve what is already mapped rather than deleting en-masse like this
iandees (2026-04-28 00:04:27+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/522315790 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181915260, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
cubbe8 (2026-04-28 00:58:35+00:00): None of these are motorways. They have at grade crossing and signals
StreetSurveyor (2026-04-28 01:17:23+00:00): At-grade crossings and signals don’t automatically make a road “primary.” These segments don’t function like primary roads—they carry through traffic with limited to no access.

Some sections don’t even have crossings, reinforcing that they operate more like a controlled corridor than a typical primary road.

They’re also comparable to the southern portions of Route 1, which are already tagged as motorway, so there’s a consistency argument as well.

They may not be perfect motorways, but calling them primary clearly understates their role.
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-28 05:34:03+00:00): IMHO should be reverted.
I-76 (2026-04-28 14:45:04+00:00): Yep, reverted
Fizzie-DWG (2026-04-29 07:23:35+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20199
iandees (2026-04-28 00:19:06+00:00): Hi! It looks like the website URL on way/1499962733 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted.
b-jazz (2026-04-28 04:27:13+00:00): Copied comments into original changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181423736).

Added a bug (https://gitlab.com/b-jazz/https_all_the_things/-/work_items/13) to the bot repo to exclude certain strings in URL params.
iandees (2026-04-28 04:27:13+00:00): Thanks for passing this down to the original editor.
iandees (2026-04-28 04:27:58+00:00): The code for my checker is here: https://github.com/iandees/node-drag-watcher/blob/main/checkers/website.py#L122
neuhausr (2026-05-05 14:02:38+00:00): Thanks for adding residential areas! However, it is best practice to *not* attach landuse areas to roads or sidewalks--it's not strictly accurate and makes working with those features harder in the future. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential#Separation_from_roads  Happy mapping!
MatiSL (2026-05-05 19:14:48+00:00): Aloha! thank youvthe feedback, I was working on base of the structure already set on the map previously, however I understand why this is an issue and I will correct this information, Mahalo!
Ltrlg (2026-04-29 06:08:14+00:00): Les adresses sont généralement considérées comme des objets différents de ce qui y est présent (même si unique). Le fait que les deux utilisent le schéma addr:* est malheureux mais aucune solution de remplacement ne fait consensus pour le moment.
mw014 (2026-04-29 08:52:49+00:00): Ah bon d'accord,
Comment peut-on faire pour que le magasin indique la bonne adresse plutôt que "rue de Malmouche" indiquée actuellement dans OSM?
(Pour faciliter la navigation etc.)
Merci
Ltrlg (2026-04-29 12:21:15+00:00): Oh, pardon, je n’aurais pas dû annuler l’ajout de addr:housenumber=* sur node/9124547851. C’est l’un des deux schémas concurrents. Dans ce cas, il faut ajouter addr:street=* sur le POI (comme pour les points d’adresse. type=associatedStreet est officiellement obsolète en France, mais conservé sauf refonte majeure de la rue ou décision locale). Comme ça donc : changeset/181985589.

(L’autre schéma est d’utiliser contact:housenumber=* + contact:street=* sur le POI. J’ai une préférence pour ce dernier, mais j’ai l’impression que les discussions vont en général plutôt dans l’autre sens.)
eggie (2026-04-28 06:26:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
LachlanTansey2009 (2026-04-28 01:37:39+00:00): Forgot to add this to the log,
I've removed the through running relations from the Werribee/Williamstown Lines routemaster as they are not yet operational.
iandees (2026-04-28 03:36:41+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7630704131 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181918539, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-28 09:12:56+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong here. This changeset contains several duplicate mapped buildings. Could you please checkt this?

Thanks.
skibum77 (2026-04-28 03:34:49+00:00): * I used the Warren County GIS (warrengis.integritygis.com) to put the boundary in.
ajmat (2026-04-29 07:35:45+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 181974056
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:50:49+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184131084

https://osm.org/changeset/184131084
NorthCrab_upload (2026-04-28 05:21:43+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974120072

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.

"Żeńsko":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331728069
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331730407
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331730628
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331730713

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
iandees (2026-04-28 04:52:12+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13759936313 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181920037, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:02:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:57:26+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184131334

https://osm.org/changeset/184131334
Totor (2026-04-29 04:49:43+00:00): Hi CholoRommmm,
Another remark before you add too many names: names should not be entered in all capitals. (Except maybe for abbreviations).
I'm impressed by the number of points of interest you added in a few days.
Keep up the good job!
Totor (2026-05-08 04:11:50+00:00): Hi again,
I just noticed this is clearly a duplicate. I'll remove it.
CAM-Gerlach (2026-05-23 06:04:06+00:00): Hi,

If you're going to add businesses to OSM for your clients, you have an obligation (to both your client and to us) to at least make every reasonable effort to use correct tags and values. Many of the tags added here (address, opening_hours=*, phone=* website=*) are used incorrectly to the point of being essentially nonsense, which both pollutes the map with junk data and means they will not be intelligible to data consumers reading the map, defeating the purpose of your efforts here.

It's not really that hard to use iD's beginner-friendly presets to fill in this information correctly, or spend a few minutes reading the wiki on how to format your tags properly. After all, you are being paid to do this properly for your client. While it is your responsibility to fix this, I went ahead and did it for you in changeset 183051556

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183051556
Ltrlg (2026-04-28 06:19:50+00:00): source += Cadastre
StC (2026-04-28 07:56:05+00:00): Hi,

this changeset has broken the continuity of a hiking route that passes there. I'll take care of the repair.
gscholz (2026-04-28 09:19:01+00:00): Thanks for picking this up. An other question: Why do the bus routes there not use the busway?
Guido
StC (2026-04-29 07:26:29+00:00): No idea, sorry. I do only QA for outdoors routes, and my only concern about bus routes is trying not to break them when I work.
MappingMore (2026-04-28 06:29:11+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181922803
14im (2026-04-29 22:20:06+00:00): Bonjour,
Je suis étonné de l'attribut d'obsolescence posé sur le club de tennis de table.
A entendre des pratiquants, cette salle a été rénovée récemment.
Quelle est votre source d'information ?
jblb (2026-04-30 07:43:45+00:00): il doit s'agir d'une erreur de manipulation avec StreetComplete car effectivement le club est bien actif...
BCNorwich (2026-04-28 07:41:59+00:00): Hi, you seem to have inadvertently duplicated sections of highways. I've corrected this.

Regards Bernard.
gqin (2026-04-28 08:37:00+00:00): Hi, thank you for the correction, and sorry for my mistaken attempt.

I’m currently mining OSM history data and came across a case of distance injection in the past many years: for example, turning a line from A-B-C into A-B-C-B-C, which artificially extends the length and could affect downstream applications.

I’m curious about how such an injection would be reverted. Could you please explain how this is typically detected today, and whether this could be considered a vulnerability in the system?

Best.
BCNorwich (2026-04-28 11:07:18+00:00): Hi, I don't really understand the statement nor the question. But any problem has to be detected first. In this case the detection was because I look at all new mappers, (in eastern england), first few edits. I saw a problem with your edit and worked out what change was made to create the problem. I then worked out the best way to revert the problem. The easy way was to use a reverting tool in my JOSM editor. Done!

Regards Bernard.
BholeKiBhasam (2026-05-03 13:39:09+00:00): Revert noted. Please clarify the specific tagging error or source conflict so I can align with the local schema.
katpatuka (2026-05-03 16:42:47+00:00): Which tagging error exactly are you talking of?
BholeKiBhasam (2026-05-04 01:33:23+00:00): g'day, well you probably reverted about 7 edits and I could not find the reason, as others usually correspond me to correct before reverts...
katpatuka (2026-05-04 07:14:08+00:00): I didn't "revert" anything as far as I remember - I've only updated tags of towns or townships. What exactly are you talking of ? A boundary, a river, some highways, tags of places?
BholeKiBhasam (2026-05-04 13:47:19+00:00): 1.	Way 	1176079065 	2 	180184229 	181923022 	2026-04-28
2.	Way 	1176079064 	2 	180184229 	181923022 	2026-04-28
3.	Way 	1176079081 	2 	180184091 	181893344 	2026-04-27
4.	Way 	894654270 	4 	180184091 	181893344 	2026-04-27
5.	Way 	894654272 	4 	180184229 	181893344 	2026-04-27
6.	Way 	51676708 	9 	180184091 	181893344 	2026-04-27
7.	Way 	1176079082 	2 	180184091 	181893344 	2026-04-27
BholeKiBhasam (2026-05-04 13:47:37+00:00): may be the software used, not sure
BholeKiBhasam (2026-05-04 13:48:45+00:00): never mind if software did that...moving out...thanks, have a great week
katpatuka (2026-05-05 07:49:30+00:00): thank you, you too ;)

I'm editing using the josm editor mostly with Esri World Imagery like you.
MappingMore (2026-04-30 05:22:48+00:00): Revert of 181923048
NorthCrab_upload (2026-04-28 06:51:27+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1504824062

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
EJRAMA (2026-04-28 10:51:40+00:00): Jak podaję mój adres w jakichkolwiek zamówieniach/formularzach, w polach "ulica" zawsze wymagane jest wpisanie po prostu "Przytkowice" + numer domu, ponieważ nie ma tam w ogóle nazw ulic. Mogę usunąć ulicę, ale dodałem tak jak zawsze w oficjalnych dokumentach muszę podawać.
ajmat (2026-05-01 05:26:58+00:00): Reverted in changeset id: 182057815
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:02:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
iandees (2026-04-28 13:27:14+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/453284113 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181941148, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 08:59:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Dimitar155 (2026-04-28 08:32:01+00:00): Здравей Пламен,

Защо заменяш нарязаните полигони с огромен полигон? Видимо по магистралата, жп линията и главен път №8 няма дървета. Съвсем спокойно можеше този огромен полигон да приключва южно от магистралата.

Поздрави,
Митко
plamen (2026-04-28 09:01:34+00:00): Ползвах някаква готова линия за гората.
Dimitar155 (2026-04-28 09:11:22+00:00): Хубаво е да не ползваш някаква готова линия, особено ако не си проверил за какво се използва. В случая е граница на планински масив, което няма много общо с земеползването - relation/1371387
tevildo_ (2026-04-29 15:11:28+00:00): @plamen, потвърждавам, че огромните полигони (и *особено* мултиполигони) земно покритие са напълно невъзможни за поддръжка. Допълнително – внасяш грешки в картата като не внимаваш достатъчно да няма застъпване между различни видове земно покритие.

Резултатът от това е, че земното покритие е невярно и при поправка трябва да се свърши двойно повече работа, отколкото ако изобщо нямаше земно покритие.

За да оправя след промените ти в Троянско взех данни от отворения датасет за земеползване на МЗХ, работих землище по землище и проверявах многоъгълник по многоъгълник, сравнявайки с цифровата ортофотокарта.

Моля те, влагай усилието, което openstreetmap заслужава. Когато се въвежда земно покритие, е нужно да се работи в детайл, и да се създават минимални и лесни за поддръжка многоъгълници.
plamen (2026-04-29 17:49:35+00:00): Така е. Ще има подобрения. Важното е да се почне от някъде.
MappingMore (2026-04-30 07:38:14+00:00): Revert of 181923977
BCNorwich (2026-04-28 12:34:14+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately, your route has resulted in duplication of highways, which could disrupt routing.  There are now also many highway crossings, and many warnings for them are posted above. Thus I've removed this highway, this is done in changeset 181938293.

The correct way to map a cycle route is to add all existing sections of the route into a route relation. Is this route a formal route, I can't find mention of it on the web? May I suggest the beginners guide here:- https://learnosm.org/en/josm/josm-relations/#route-relations

If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
gqin (2026-04-28 08:37:52+00:00): Hi, thank you for the correction, and sorry for my mistaken attempt.

I’m currently mining OSM history data and came across a case of distance injection in the past many years: for example, turning a line from A-B-C into A-B-C-B-C, which artificially extends the length and could affect downstream applications.

I’m curious about how such an injection would be reverted. Could you please explain how this is typically detected today, and whether this could be considered a vulnerability in the system?

Best.
eggie (2026-04-28 08:03:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:58:06+00:00): Reverted adding SEO POI with blatant advertising and malformed tags, possibly sourced from Google Maps, in changeset 184131350

https://osm.org/changeset/184131350