piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-25 19:31:41+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zawierać przedrostka. Nazwa ulicy nie powinna zaczynać się od 'ul.', 'ulica' itp. Należy usunąć przedrostek i pozostawić samą nazwę ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12618861401

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

Zasady nazewnictwa ulic w polsce:
https://wiki.osm.org/Pl:Znakowanie_dróg_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Michaall99 (2025-02-25 19:36:56+00:00): Hello, why did you remove the building=apartments tag? Isn't this place a building? If it is a building but you don't know its type, set the building tag to yes.
baumkuchen (2025-02-27 20:34:15+00:00): @Michaall99 Sorry, did not mean to do that. I just wanted to add the museum to the apartment building
baumkuchen (2025-02-27 20:35:32+00:00): @NorthCrab_upload Thanks for the links. I actually was unsure about the conventions here, so thank you for educating me on it!
baumkuchen (2025-02-27 20:39:10+00:00): @Michaal99 I checked and I did not remove the apartment tag from the building. I just added a new point, which has the more specific type of Museum. But it might be that the online editor of OSM is not showing me something that you are seeing, so feel free to fix the issue.
gscscnd (2025-02-26 07:20:35+00:00): locale in facebook link.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-02-25 19:41:09+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2784533983
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2784533981
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1362924546

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mstrbrid (2025-09-15 15:04:13+00:00): Hi, how are you mapping these underground features? It's something I could be interested in pursuing myself but unsure about how to source the information.
kesterlester (2025-09-21 19:59:57+00:00): Hi, sorry for the delay in responding.
Perhaps easiest to have a chat on something like zoom if you want the most details?

However, the short answer is by putting together information from:

* crop markings in aerial photos,
* pipe marker seen at field edges,
* photos uploaded to geograph.org.uk,
* public domain information from gas suppliers, such as their notifications to industrial customers as to when main gas routes will be out of commission for maintenance,
* walks through farmers fields.
mstrbrid (2025-09-22 14:55:56+00:00): That's fine - thanks. I'm looking to focus on water infrastructure and hoping that there might be some crossover, but I guess gas is that much better signed for safety. Still, the geograph tip was a good reminder to have a look there occasionally - thanks.
kesterlester (2025-09-22 16:32:07+00:00): yes, water pipes are frequently among the hardest to map, in my experience, mainly as they don't seem to need to maintain markers for safety, so if the farmer crushes the markers with his tractor or they subside into a ditch, no-one fixes them. That and the markers are rarely brightly coloured (and if they are coloured it is often dark blue which does not show pu well against grass).
kesterlester (2025-09-22 16:32:56+00:00): (I have not focussed on water pipes, but I have sometimes had to put them in where they have come up or got in the way of gas mapping)
JAAS (2025-02-26 18:07:06+00:00): Hola Mao_ITDP,

Primero quiero agradecerte que agregues las ciclovías al mapa de OSM, pero deberás hacer unas correcciones para apegarse a las reglas establecidas.

Por ejemplo, en el tramo que has nombrado: `name=Ruta G-76 cycleway` no creo que ese sea el nombre oficial con el "cycleway" escrito en inglés, y si así fuera, debiera escribirse siempre con la letra inicial en mayúscula como sucede con cualquier nombre propio. 

Por otro lado, el dibujo de la misma ciclovía aparece por encima de los edificios (casas), cosa que no está bien dibujado - al momento de dibujar los edificios (de acuerdo a las imágenes satelitales), éstos se cruzarían con la vía. Pero en realidad no haría falta dibujarlo, pues no es una vía que corre por separado a la calle. En este caso se trata de un `lane`, al no existir alguna barrera física separando esta del resto del camino. De hecho, yo sugeriría crear en su lugar una relación que incluya todos los segmentos de la ciclovía con su nombre correcto, respetando los demás nombres de las vías sobre la cual pase y dejando así establecida la ruta en su totalidad con su propio nombre para que cualquiera pueda encontrar y seguirla. - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=909938846950251&focus=photo&lat=-33.491338659109&lng=-71.032966235719&z=17

No ninguna manera pretendo disuadirte de seguir agregando las ciclovías, solo pido que se haga de forma correcta. Puedo apoyarte si lo necesitaras en algún momneto.

Saludos,
JAAS
Tatti Barletta (2025-02-25 20:06:43+00:00): Also I'm not sure what to make of the landuse there, but judging from Esri photos I doubt it is going to be farmland.
felipeeugenio (2025-02-26 12:39:09+00:00): Hola. No se trata solo de dibujar el trazado de la ciclovía. Hay que hacer las conexiones en cada esquina y preocuparse de que sea con los tags correctos. Además por favor no usar nombres genéricos.
b-jazz (2025-02-26 18:03:52+00:00): Hey there mech32, thanks for helping out with golf course mapping. We appreciate the work, but I wanted to point out some issues.

You have breaking relationships between features. This is caused by you deleting something like a fairway boundary that is part of a multipolygon and then recreating, but leaving the relationship around with only the green as part of it.

It's a bad idea to delete features and recreate them from scratch. They should be modified if at all possible. If this is too difficult with the iD editor, maybe use something like JOSM. And if you must delete something, make sure it isn't part of a multipolygon first and if it is, properly recreate the multipolygon after your edits. 

Please read up on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls to better understand. If you have any comments, please reach out and I'll clarify. Thanks.
mech32 (2025-02-26 18:35:33+00:00): Hello, I understand what your saying. What probably happened is I marked a  a couple fairways using a line instead of an area. I have been mapping courses now for over 4 years all over the world. I know there have been issues in the past with other users deleting features around courses that should not be touched. I will always ask the person what is on the course that I can see because sometime OSM and google maps really are horrible is showing features. The clarity sometimes are blurred and you can only guess the outline of fairways, bunkers, tee box etc. 
However I do respect what you are saying and by looking at some of the pics in the description that is exactly what I do.
Have a great day :)
b-jazz (2025-02-27 02:56:40+00:00): Thanks for getting back to me mech32. Can you confirm with me that you understand how relationships and multipolygons work? It wasn't quite clear from your comment that you understood that and how to avoid breaking them. Thanks.
mech32 (2025-02-27 03:40:18+00:00): I do see the multipolygon in the link you shared but not  eally sure how you created it around the green or bunker. If I draw an area around green let's say I and tag it as fairway everything around the tagged green it should be a fairway? So how is the inner area marked as in that multipolygon? 
This is what I have been doing as when I map, this is for video software used for golf simulator. My process is let's say on a fairway there is a bunker and there is rough around the bunker, I would mark that as a bunker then map half way around the bunker from the edge of fairway leaving a gap to identify the rough, the map the other half of fairway around the bunker joining the points of the fairway, thus when I extract the data from OSM it shows up exactly like the golf course. 
If you are on discord I would love to do a video chat with you. I am on the OSM server under my name Dean.
How or what button are you selecting to create the multipolygon or do I just add another area and tag it as rough? The fairway will over rite the rough and the green will over rite the fairway. I am sure it is to do and minor change for me. I am done mapping the course for what I need it for. I get the lidar info from the ministry and use a tool to import game file, lidar and OSM into one file and then start the creation. 
Hope to chat with you, time for this old guy to hit the hay.
joost schouppe (2025-03-18 13:13:22+00:00): Ook deze https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/669694833 lijkt me eerder chapel dan church
felipeeugenio (2025-02-26 18:51:58+00:00): almost 50% of this cycleway does not exist.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162948111
Msiipola (2025-02-26 08:34:08+00:00): Don't change this!!
cycloergosum (2025-02-26 17:32:21+00:00): Why? Isn't this accessible by feet and bike?
Msiipola (2025-02-26 18:47:03+00:00): highway=unclassified is always accessible by foot and bicycle by default. At least here in Sweden. Only if foot or bicycle is not allowed you set foot=no or bicycle=no
Never bicycle=yes or foot=yes.

If you don't believe me, ask in the osm-forum, or somebody who is more experience then you on osm mapping.

See also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions

Browse to rules for Sweden on the page.
cycloergosum (2025-02-26 19:46:43+00:00): OK, I understand the bridge is automatically ok to go on with feet and bike. But the segments before and after say ACCESS=NO, and this does not allow to routing apps to go on it. Why can't I change it? Is it closed?
Msiipola (2025-02-26 22:21:32+00:00): If don't if the access=no is correct or not. If correct then additional tags should say what type of traffic is allowed. But it does not. 
If you know cycle/foot/horse is allowed, add your tags. If not, don't add them.

By the way, I assume you live in Italy? Or do you live in Sollefteå and have local knowledge about this bridge? Why is this so important to you?
cycloergosum (2025-02-26 22:42:34+00:00): I do live in Italy, working for komoot. We're currently working on some nordic countries routes, and I am looking for some info about it. Since I've seen many pictures of it and news about it being used (https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fsollefteakommun%2Fposts%2Fpfbid02qEpqTtt9sqFDiD3Msf8yxRVqWN2aZxdNrbvVnkPCe6nAnkJtprQL4cyUNpsnn8kal) I thought it is usable and so I updated the info. If you have some sources saying the bridge is not allowed for cyclists and pedestrians, please could you provide it?
Msiipola (2025-02-27 06:58:13+00:00): As I said, tagging with only access=no is not enough. It need other tags saying what traffic i allowed. If any. 
To me the image shows like a ordinary road. The Swedish national road database (NVDB) doesn't has no info that the road has access restrictions. 

I will ask in the Swedish osm-forum, if any has local knowledge about this.
cycloergosum (2025-02-27 14:08:08+00:00): So we're saying the same thing. Please take a look at Strava Heatmap and tell me if bikes and pedestrians can't go there. They sure can, and I'd like to change this ACCESS=NO into ACCESS=YES for bikes and pedestrians. I don't know why it was marked ACCESS=NO, it surely is accessible, if not by car or motor vehicles, by feet and bike. How can we fix that?
Msiipola (2025-02-27 14:15:14+00:00): https://maps.app.goo.gl/F1q4wYNRdCBzK6XK8

The sign says only vehicles with permission are allowed.
I recommend setting:
vehicle=private
on the whole road on the bridge and where the road ends on the island, delete access=no and not adding any other tags for foot/bicycle/horse
Msiipola (2025-02-27 14:36:05+00:00): About cycles and pedestrians going on the road. What traffic law say and what people do, breaking the laws, are to different things. We should map osm according to the law.
b-jazz (2025-02-26 18:14:04+00:00): On Hole 11, you shouldn't use multiple polygons to make up a single fairway. Read the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course) for how to map bunkers and fairways and green properly using multipolygons with inner/outer relationships. If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out and I'll help clarify.
kmpoppe_repair (2025-02-25 21:01:50+00:00): This CS reverted https://osm.org/changeset/162946070
eggie (2025-02-25 21:32:08+00:00): Dag Ody...  
Je vraagt feedback.. 
Lijkt me oke zo.
De sloot kun je evt intekenen met een lijnelement waterway=ditch

MVG
eggie
jengelh (2026-05-03 16:49:17+00:00): Dafür dass du hier andere kritisiert, hast du aber selbst einen ziemlich unsauberen Parkplatz eingefügt
(osm.org/way/1362938854 ist jedenfalls ne Katastrophe gegenüber way 224925103)
aixbrick (2025-02-26 08:44:35+00:00): Hallo,
landuse wird in Verbindung mit power=plant nur bei Kraftwerksarealen genutzt, das hier ist lediglich ein Batteriespeicher.
Das addr:*-Schema wird nur verwendet, wenn es sich um eine postalische Anschrift handelt, man dort also Post hinschicken kann. Das ist hier eher nicht der Fall. Alternativ kann https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:object:* verwendet werden.
Ich hoffe, dass du dich vor der Eintragung versichert hast, dass die Daten im Marktstammdatenregister korrekt sind und der Speicher vor Ort auch so existiert (gilt auch für deine anderen Eintragungen in Deutschland).
Gruß
Sven50981103 (2025-02-26 12:43:44+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise und Nachfragen, @aixbrick.
Beim Taggen habe ich mich weitgehend an die Wiki-Empfehlung https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:plant:source%3Dbattery gehalten.
Die Adresse kommt aus dem Marktstammdatenregister der BNA, wird nach meiner Kenntnis vom Betreiber selbst eingetragen.

Ich tagge nur die Sachen, die ich mindestens im Luftbild auch sehen und zuordnen kann. 
Wenn ich das Objekt nicht finde, hinterlasse ich einen Hinweis.

Gruß zurück
aixbrick (2025-02-26 14:16:03+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung (und für's "landuse" löschen :-)).
Im MaStR steht natürlich eine Adresse, damit der Ort erkennbar ist.
In OSM ergibt sich der Ort aber automatisch aus der gemappten Lage. Sofern das Objekt keine "echte" bzw. postalische Adresse besitzt (so wie ein Haus, ein Geschäft...) würde ich auch keine addr:*-Schlüssel hinzufügen, sondern stattdessen, falls wirklich nötig, object:* verwenden.
NeisBot (2025-02-26 05:01:47+00:00): Hi Thijs2, and thank you for your contributions to the OSM project!

I've noticed that over the past few hours, you've made several changesets with comments that might be unclear, difficult to understand, or consistently repetitive.

For collaboration within the OSM community, it’s helpful to provide comments that explain the changes you’ve made. This helps others follow your work more easily. You can find some useful tips for writing clear and effective changeset comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks for your attention to this.

PS: I’ve also sent this message through the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#ClearComments
silversurfer83 (2025-02-26 07:12:22+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap :)

danke, dass du (ihr?) hilfst die Datenbank aktuell zu halten.

OsmAnd ist eine tolle App mit unglaublich vielen Möglichkeiten. Falls du Interesse hast die offensichtliche Adressarmut in Niedersachsen etwas effektiver zu beheben, kann ich die App StreetComplete empfehlen, mit der bei schönen Spaziergängen sehr einfach fehlende Information gesammelt werden kann.

(In Niedersachsen dürfen wir leider die amtlichen Daten (noch) nicht nutzen, daher müssen Adressen von Hand vor Ort recherchiert und eingepflegt werden)

Bei Fragen immer raus damit und viel Spaß an der Karte

silversurfer83
Endres Pelka (2025-10-30 18:24:31+00:00): Das war eher für den Ortsname gemeint, nicht für einen Adresspunkt? Ich korrigiere das jetzt.
puma515 (2025-02-27 10:51:56+00:00): Dinge werden in OSM so erfasst wie sie in der Realität vorhanden sind. 

Die info: access=private zeigte bereits korekt an das dies ein privatweg ist. 
Da dieser weg auch immer noch vor ort vorhanden ist und korrekt erfasst war habe ich ihre löschung rückgängig gemacht.
joel56dt (2025-02-25 21:39:03+00:00): Hello,
It looks like the access tags may be slightly different than you intended. The "motor_vehicle" key means regular cars/drivers. To indicate that public service vehicles and busses are permitted we would add "psv=yes", "bus=yes", but leave "motor_vehicle=no". Does this match what you intended?
Thanks,
Joel
joel56dt (2025-02-25 21:39:56+00:00): Or if there is a sign that specifically designates the use of bus, psv, bike, whatever, we could set the value to "=designated"
UpLift_Vancouver (2025-02-25 22:34:05+00:00): @joel56dt the intention behind this revision was due to a game, City Bus Manager, not showing the road properly. It was showing up as a pedestrian/bike only path in game for some reason. I had made the revision with the intention of fixing that problem. Thanks for the suggestion, I will look into it.
kmpoppe_repair (2025-02-25 21:03:43+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 162946075.
kmpoppe_repair (2025-02-25 21:04:41+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 162946096.
felipeeugenio (2025-02-26 18:58:42+00:00): corrected
felipeeugenio (2025-02-26 19:00:35+00:00): 100% fictional
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162949518
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 18:39:34+00:00): Hello!

You used
motor_vehicle=privatea
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1307019581/history

Have you maybe meant
motor_vehicle=private
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Jordi MF (2025-04-28 22:00:13+00:00): Thank you, Mateusz! Yes, it was a mistake. I have fixed it to motor_vehicle=private.

Regards.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 05:04:14+00:00): thanks for a quick fix!
Strubbl (2025-02-25 21:47:30+00:00): Hi gießkanne, vielen Dank für deine Änderungen. Wenn du mehrere Wikidata-Items eintragen möchtest, trenne sie am besten mit einem Semikolon anstatt eines Kommas. Das ist der gängige Weg in OSM für mehrere Werte. Dann sollten die Werte auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1362945788 auch anklickbar werden.
KartoGrapHiti (2025-03-24 22:48:07+00:00): Der Straßenteil ist nach meinem Wissen im oberen teil keine Einbahnstraße, weil dort kein blaues Einbahnstraßenschild steht: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=326846782280335 Nur unten steht ein Verbot der Einfahrt: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=481025016644356 Ich habe daher den Eintrag wieder entfernt.
Jens K (2025-03-25 13:32:06+00:00): Gutes Auge, danke. Ich hab die Einbahnstraße im unteren Teil nun auf entfernt und das Verbot der Einfahrt in der korrekten Richtung gemappt. Überdies ist nun auch das dort bereits gemappt Straßenschild korrigiert. So das dort nun sowohl DE:267 als auch DE:209-10 gemappt wurde.
KartoGrapHiti (2025-03-25 19:59:29+00:00): Vielen Dank.
Pixsa (2025-02-25 21:40:43+00:00): This is mistake
felipeeugenio (2025-02-26 20:00:30+00:00): more than half of this cycleway is invented
silversurfer83 (2025-02-25 21:46:35+00:00): Moin

Hab mal stichprobenartig in Plön reingeschaut und da war "Kreis Plön" schon als official_name hinterlegt. Warum genau muss hier jetzt überall das Wort "Kreis" in "name=*" gepackt werden?

Grüße
silversurfer83
thedarkx (2025-02-25 21:53:45+00:00): Moinsen,
bspw. bei den Kreisen Segeberg, Pinneberg und Steinburg war diese Variante hinterlegt und ich habe mich dann einfach dafür entschieden, weil ein Diskussionsartikel aus 2013, den ich bei Google gefunden habe, auch zu keinem Ergebnis gelangt ist: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/24531/ist-der-grenz-typ-kreis-beispielsweise-in-kreis-segeberg-teil-des-namens-oder-nicht

Ich kann das auch umdrehen und dann Kreis nur noch als Präfix führen. Ist halt für Anwendungen, die nur auf den name-Tag setzen nicht so optimal.
puma515 (2025-02-26 12:48:34+00:00): Moin, 
Beim vereinheitlichen von Tags ist es ratsam das vorher im Forum zu besprechen. 
Welche variante hier richtig oder besser ist kann ich selber nicht beurteilen. 
Laut objekt history war z.b. bei Rendsburg Eckernförde bis vor ca. 6 Jahren in  version 121 Kreis auch schonmal teil des Namen. 
Ich würd eRaten dazu mal eine Frage im Forum zu stellen vieleicht weiß dort jemand eine Antwort.
Link zum Deutschen Teil des OSM Forums: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56
wireguy (2025-02-25 23:17:53+00:00): hi redactly.   osm goes by a 'good practice' of mapping what's on the ground.   Has the new signage been put up?  If yes, great. If no then maybe revert the change.  how about South Taney Street?   What about updating the "addr:street" tag on all of the buildings along the road?    Also, maybe consider adding the "old_name" tag, more info at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name
saikofish (2025-02-27 23:43:36+00:00): I'm not the original editor, but I live on this street and can confirm that the new signage (at least in my neighborhood) went up last week.

I'd been meaning to make the edits myself, and I'm going to go ahead an add the old_name tag because I expect there will still be a lot of usage of the old name for some time.
Pavel_Š (2025-02-27 16:31:51+00:00): Prosím kolego, v případě, že děláš změny, zkontroluj si i všechny relace, aby to po Tobě nemuseli opravovat jiní. Tvé úpravy zneplatnili linku N92 v obou směrech. Nyní jsem opravil, ale ocením, když příště validuješ všechny prvky, kterých se úprava týkala. Nevím, v čem edituješ, ale JOSM tam vidí problémů více. Díky.
LM_1 (2025-02-28 21:44:16+00:00): Díky za upozornění. Co přesně tam bylo za problém? JOSM validátorem to prošlo a všechny relace dostaly individuální péči... I tak se chyba může stát.
felipeeugenio (2025-02-26 20:37:20+00:00): Reverted
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162950742
eggie (2025-02-26 07:16:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback:  De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
2zqa (2025-02-26 13:40:47+00:00): Hoi Eggie, dankjewel voor je DM en feedback! Als ik weer eens een wijziging doorvoer zal ik je mailtje er weer bij pakken.
bbdr (2025-02-25 22:28:24+00:00): Sorry for the big bounding box, this is a changeset in the Central African Republic (Ombella-M'Poko, north). I have fixed the unintentional edit in the DRC.
eggie (2025-02-26 07:30:07+00:00): Dag Jadey.. Parkeerstroken (geen parkeerterreinen) worden gemapt met parking=street_side en orientation=perpendicular.. (of parallel/ diagonal)
Dat levert ook minder prominente P's op. (aangepast)
Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-02-26 07:40:14+00:00): Kijk ook even bij https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_entrance
Jadey- (2025-02-26 09:52:23+00:00): Hm, dan zijn er best wat andere parkeerplaatsen in de regio om aan te passen zo te zien :) ik zal er nog even induiken. Thanks!
eggie (2025-02-26 10:09:44+00:00): Yep... dit is een manier van parkeerstroken mappen die nog niet zo lang bestaat. 
Mappers willen immers ook wat zien. Voorheen namen we de stroken op in de tagging van de hoofdrijbaan.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
Henry572 (2025-02-25 22:16:02+00:00): Die Relation mit Mitgliedern in Lohausen bis Golzheim sollte es eigentlich noch nicht geben...