piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NeisBot (2026-04-12 13:56:57+00:00): 🌍 Selamat datang di OSM, Reino Rachmatullah.
Terima kasih telah berkontribusi!

Untuk memudahkan kolaborasi dan membantu orang lain memahami perubahan yang kamu lakukan, sebaiknya tambahkan deskripsi singkat tentang perubahan yang kamu buat. Komentar yang jelas membantu komunitas mengikuti pekerjaanmu dan memberikan umpan balik yang lebih baik. Kamu bisa menemukan tips untuk menulis komentar yang baik di sini[1].

✅ Berikut adalah contoh komentar berdasarkan suntingan peta kamu: "Menambahkan restoran dengan masakan khas daerah dan mie"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, Reino Rachmatullah.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added restaurant with regional and noodle cuisine"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
OSMaper_xD (2026-04-12 17:07:37+00:00): Dzięki
NeisBot (2026-04-12 14:16:18+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Febi Khusnul Khotimah.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added, removed building attributes, including name details"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
BlockFlock (2026-05-02 02:55:57+00:00): The city of Verona has removed the four Flock cameras previously monitoring the city, including this one. I have verified it in-person. Please stop re-adding this camera to the map.
Metzor (2026-04-20 16:02:15+00:00): Hallo Thunderberry,

Könntest du "Campingplatz Nordzufahrt" bitte vom Namen in die Beschreibung (description)  verschieben?
Denn es ist nun mal kein Name im Sinne von OpenStreetMap.

Danke und wenn du Hilfe brauchst einfach melden.

Gruß
Metzor
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181232883
rempshaener (2026-04-29 18:21:22+00:00): Teilanpassung ausschließlich von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13725333075 mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182003018
rempshaener (2026-04-29 18:33:27+00:00): weitere Korrekturen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181968447 erläutert und mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182003402 umgesetzt
Metzor (2026-04-29 20:02:39+00:00): Danke rempshaener!
OSMaper_xD (2026-04-12 15:09:10+00:00): Czyż nie do tego służy link?
A67-A67 (2026-04-12 21:04:29+00:00): In deze wijziging wordt ook de Kruithuisweg in Delft omgezet naar binnen bebouwde kom. Deze weg ligt echter volledig buiten de bebouwde kom.
emvee (2026-04-12 22:12:44+00:00): Bedankt voor de terugmelding, ja dat is fout gegaan.

Inmiddels teruggedraaid in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181250979
NeisBot (2026-04-12 14:46:20+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, rizka azizah salma.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added footway with sidewalk designation, name Gang Sempit, and width 20"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
silversurfer83 (2026-04-12 19:02:24+00:00): Hi there :)

welcome to OSM.

Two things regarding this changeset:

- your buildings look almost cerntainly too large. With the available imagery you can draw them much closer to reality than you have done here.

- The highway=cylceway you changed look almost certainly wrong. It may me open for debate to draw them as their own OSM-way but they are not foot=yes since they are designated bike lanes on the asphalt where no pedestrians are allowed. So I ask you to please remove the foot=yes you added here and maybe make your buildings a bit nicer.

If there are any questions regarding anything OSM please reach out. Where there 24/7 at c.osm.org, Signal, Slack, even Discord.

cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181233846
iandees (2026-04-12 23:50:07+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13725300200 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181252602, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
Mannivu (2026-04-13 06:15:42+00:00): That's weird. I noticed this and I'm sure I had fixed it. Probably I hadn't saved it or done something wrong in the process. Anyway, thank you for the fix!
pitscheplatsch (2026-04-12 16:31:00+00:00): Hi Luwigalons, willkommen bei OSM.

Die folgende Node bzw. der eingetragene Name hat dann doch bei mir einen kleinen bis größeren Alarm auf Englisch ausgelöst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13725363591

Viele Grüße

#HappyMapping
Luwigalons (2026-04-12 16:44:20+00:00): Haha daran habe ich noch gar nicht gedacht. Der Hofname löst unter Deutschen schon oft ein kleines Schmunzeln aus aber du hast Recht, auf Englisch wirkt das ganze nochmal schlimmer ;)
Wilhem275 (2026-07-21 11:03:28+00:00): Ciao htwan, secondo me hai fatto bene ad evidenziare come Secondary quel tratto di strada, ma mi è venuta la curiosità se ci sia un motivo specifico per non proseguire il tag anche sul tratto terminale, fino all'intersezione con SP17.
htwan (2026-07-26 14:56:14+00:00): Per questa strada si potrebbe anche estendere il tratto sud come secondary, io mi sono inizialmente basato sui cartelli di tratta di competenza.
In genere ho seguito le linee guida sulla wiki di regionali e statali come primary, provinciali come secondary e tertiari per altre strade comunali più importanti delle laterali, ed ho notato che ciò è applicato generalmente alla lettera nella provincia di Padova, con alcune eccezioni, ma non per Venezia dove ci sono strade provinciali e regionali categorizzate erroneamente con categorie inferiori.
MappingMore (2026-04-14 07:22:50+00:00): Partially Revert of 181232806
akghosal (2026-04-14 07:56:51+00:00): Could you please explain this above comment a bit further MappingMore, many thanks. Have you reverted any bit of my edits or do you want me to revert or alter any part of my edits here? Because this interchange is now under construction (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CTlAIYhgNA&t=167s) and I added it on to reflect this (I made many changes to my edits because I'm new here and I initially wasn't that familiar with adding under construction roads).
sommallorqui (2026-04-12 14:54:55+00:00): link: https://www.ajmao.org/WebEditor/Pagines/file/BARRIS.pdf
AndersAndersson (2026-04-13 10:25:58+00:00): Hej!
Varför tog du bort åsen?
AndersAndersson (2026-04-18 22:49:29+00:00): Inget svar.
Återställt i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181518725
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-18 01:45:15+00:00): Reverted adding explicitly Google Maps-sourced information, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184250744

https://osm.org/changeset/184250744
Dimitar155 (2026-04-13 18:51:38+00:00): Здравей Боби,

Наблизо има още една статуя на Колю Фичето (node/4394694646). Да не би да са я преместили тук?

Поздрави,
Митко
Boyan Alexiev (2026-06-29 12:37:03+00:00): И двата обекта са на място:
node/4394694646 – Статуя на Колю Фичето
node/13725430501 – Паметна плоча, тук вероятно името е описателно и съответно излишно
Dimitar155 (2026-06-29 13:02:31+00:00): Мерси за отговора, коригирах ги.
MappingMore (2026-04-14 16:16:55+00:00): Revert of 181212021
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-19 01:18:17+00:00): DWG revert - improper mapping & deletion of valid features

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184294100
iandees (2026-04-12 23:52:16+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2191557613 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181252628, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
ShyShark (2026-04-13 07:41:06+00:00): Yes, looking at what you’re saying, it’s true that it was a mistake. Sorry, and thanks for making the change.
OSMaper_xD (2026-04-12 15:21:40+00:00): Dzięki, totalnie to przeoczylem
toster234 (2026-04-12 16:38:53+00:00): construction=residential
landuse=retail

jakaś pomyłka chyba
toster234 (2026-05-01 15:36:49+00:00): ???
way/441127164/history/
toster234 (2026-05-02 10:27:36+00:00): Poprawiłem, bo coś chyba sam nie umiałeś posprzątać po sobie
NeisBot (2026-04-12 15:36:19+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Supriatna Saputra.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added park with permit access, named Lapangan Bulu Tangkis"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
MappingMore (2026-04-14 04:17:00+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:181302700
Wildsharky (2026-04-13 12:00:10+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181257418
Wildsharky (2026-05-12 05:34:15+00:00): Hi Purumi,

Thank you for your feedback and for sharing the additional local reference. After reviewing your comments, it seems the name has been restored to the previous version. Thank you for contributing local knowledge and helping improve OpenStreetMap data quality.
Pink Duck (2026-04-13 14:22:31+00:00): You really can’t rely on years out of date proprietary Google StreetView as your primary source.
czebureks (2026-07-20 11:56:13+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za aktualizację! Czy dobrze rozumiem z opisu zmiany, że istnieje ścieżka między posesjami Wysocka 68 a 70, umożliwiająca przejście do jeziora? Myślę, że w takim razie warto by ją było dodać.
Michał Górny (2026-07-21 06:36:14+00:00): Niestety, nie zanotowałem, między którymi posesjami była ścieżka, i nie miałem wówczas załączonego nagrywania trasy. Idealnie byłoby, gdyby ktoś mieszkający ciut bliżej poszukał; ja przede wszystkim chciałem zapobiec, żeby ktoś się nie wkopał jak ja.
czebureks (2026-07-21 12:10:36+00:00): Dzięki za odpowiedź. Ale chodzi o inne miejsce niż ta ścieżka, którą już dodałeś: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1498820628 ?
Michał Górny (2026-07-21 15:43:04+00:00): O, jednak dodałem? Widać źle pamiętałem. W takim razie tak, to ta.
rempshaener (2026-04-13 19:05:14+00:00): Hallo,
wie schon mal hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179772878 kurz andiskutiert: Hast du vor, in größerem Umfang Gehwege zu erfassen ? Wie schon mal angedeutet: so etwas sollte schon flächendeckend und einheitlich geschehen. Und entweder du hast seeehr viel Zeit oder Mitstreiter - und zumindest letztere dürftest du nicht haben ;-)
Viele Grüße
Michi_10 (2026-04-14 04:47:21+00:00): Guten Morgen,
danke für deine Rückmeldung. Zu einem ist es mir bewusst, dass das Mapping von Gehwegen großflächig und aufwendig ist. Ich hatte hier lediglich ein Verbindungsstück getaggt. Zum zweiten, dass ich deiner Meinung nach viel Zeit hätte, könnte daran liegen, dass ich momentan keine Prüfungen schreiben muss😅, da hast du Recht.
Viele Grüße
Michi_10 (2026-04-14 06:40:43+00:00): Bezüglich Mitstreitern: Da hast du auch Recht, ich mappe hauptsächlich selbstständig und mir ist zudem auch bewusst, dass das Taggen bei selbstständiger Arbeit aufwendig ist. Hier habe ich wie bereits erwähnt lediglich ein Verbindungsstück gemappt.
Viele Grüße
Michi_10 (2026-04-14 06:51:51+00:00): Falls ich aber vor habe, wie Beispielsweise in changeset/180717269 großflächiger Gehwege zu erfassen, nehme ich mir natürlich Zeit in Anspruch.
rempshaener (2026-04-14 15:53:11+00:00): Hallo,
Glückwunsch zur freien Zeit ;-)
Ich wollte nur etwas bremsen, ist nicht böse gemeint.
Viele Grüße
Michi_10 (2026-04-14 16:22:27+00:00): Danke dir!
NeisBot (2026-04-12 16:54:46+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13725555727 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Fahrradstation mit Automaten"

#MapWithoutSpam
iandees (2026-04-13 00:42:48+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5912784116 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181253325, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
iandees (2026-04-13 00:42:51+00:00): Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/373338746 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of the map.

I moved things back to where they were before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181253326, so no harm done!

To avoid this in the future:
- Try to click on an empty part of the map when you want to move around
- If you see a point move by mistake, press Ctrl+Z (or Cmd+Z on Mac) to undo it

Happy mapping!
marvin3 (2026-07-14 11:50:33+00:00): Hallo
Ich habe die Leistung des Solarpark im Internet nicht finden können.
Eine Angabe von entweder 1625 kW oder 1.625 MW wäre plausibler. (Der Punkt wird bei OSM als Komma interpretiert) 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Marvin
Monticola (2026-07-14 14:21:57+00:00): Hallo Marvin,
danke für den Hinweis mit dem Punkt/Komma! Ich habe es korrigiert. Die Leistung ist im Energieatlas Bayern so hinterlegt. 
Vg Johannes
ItaliA1delSole (2026-04-12 15:54:23+00:00): - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.79616789816822&lng=13.488572355811698&z=17.43756398345512&pKey=1595842388517826&focus=photo&x=0.11401283141614887&y=0.21447395881570408&zoom=3

- https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.79458600722381&lng=13.489085168006682&z=17&pKey=1401897804881754&focus=photo&x=0.5463488860120125&y=0.30200708235913204&zoom=3
trial (2026-04-12 19:36:25+00:00): Bonjour, Distributeur de produits fermiers est une description, Le nom c'est juste "Ici c'est bon"
NeisBot (2026-04-12 16:16:20+00:00): 🌍 Welcome to OSM, Ilham Fansuri Faatih.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added supermarket with 24/7 opening hours, named Alfamidi Cipinang Muara"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
Konkon153 (2026-04-12 16:21:18+00:00): [ und damit alle 191 aktuell vorhandenen Adressen in der Gemeinde Pritzier vollständig angepasst ]
ajmat (2026-04-14 07:25:18+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181307447
NeisBot (2026-04-12 16:36:31+00:00): 🌍 Selamat datang di OSM, Neryza Yulinda Arvarena.
Terima kasih telah berkontribusi!

Untuk memudahkan kolaborasi dan membantu orang lain memahami perubahan yang kamu lakukan, sebaiknya tambahkan deskripsi singkat tentang perubahan yang kamu buat. Komentar yang jelas membantu komunitas mengikuti pekerjaanmu dan memberikan umpan balik yang lebih baik. Kamu bisa menemukan tips untuk menulis komentar yang baik di sini[1].

✅ Berikut adalah contoh komentar berdasarkan suntingan peta kamu: "Menambahkan toko roti dengan alamat, jam buka, dan detail toko"
(Auto-translation)
---
🌍 Welcome to OSM, Neryza Yulinda Arvarena.
Thanks for contributing!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

✅ Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added bakery with address, opening hours, and shop details"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

#HelpfulComment
NeisBot (2026-04-12 16:39:41+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 16 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1498831290 v1 | 15 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181239762
NeisRevert (2026-04-13 05:46:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/181257982
where the comment is: "Revert test edits"
NeisAgent (2026-04-12 22:33:13+00:00): 🕵 The changeset tags appear to reference Google as a data source.

Please note that using Google Maps, Google Street View, or similar Google services as a mapping source is not allowed in OpenStreetMap due to license restrictions.

More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

If the data in this changeset was derived from Google or another incompatible source, the edits may need to be reverted.

If this is a misunderstanding and the data was collected from permitted sources (e.g. local survey, Bing imagery, local knowledge, etc.), please clarify in a reply.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-22 11:14:30+00:00): Reverted adding POI tags with source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184427222

https://osm.org/changeset/184427222
NeisRevert (2026-04-13 05:45:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/181257968
where the comment is: "Revert test edits"
Glassman (2026-04-14 02:36:17+00:00): You might want to add the tag amenity=cafe to include the cafe portion of the business
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181240207
Tomas09 (2026-04-21 15:20:44+00:00): Hello (: May I ask why almost all your changesets have so many multipolygons? You often have areas which could be enclosed by a single way with an uneccessary amount of ways or areas all over the place as a multipolygon which is rarely the best approach. This is very annoying to map with in the future. Especially in iD. 

Kind regards
Tomas09
Benito Rivera y Quiroga (2026-04-21 15:38:16+00:00): Hello, thank you for your feedback. I have addressed some of the issues you identified. I would be happy to avoid using multipolygons, and if you could send me a link that would help me put the alternatives into practice, I’d appreciate it. However, on my side, I have no difficulty implementing them with iD.
Benito Rivera y Quiroga (2026-04-21 15:38:51+00:00): Best regards,
Tomas09 (2026-04-22 13:29:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples
This page explains it very well. But for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20440282 
Could work just fine as a singular area (:
Benito Rivera y Quiroga (2026-04-26 13:56:24+00:00): Thank you for the reference. Nevertheless I believe that unfortunately it is not possible to treat relation/20440282 as a single area, because it shares a side with the relation Villa Alba (12359233).
Tomas09 (2026-04-26 22:10:57+00:00): I think you might misunderstand how multipolygons work. It shares a side with it because you made it have one. If you add a non multipolygonal area, then add another one exactly the same way and make them share just 2 nodes you can see how they connect. The same connection will work for how many nodes you want connected. See for example how https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1240782808 is connected to it's neighbour. Both are non multipolygons sharing an edge! Mulyipolygons are only needed with ways with 2000< nodes, or with holes in it.
Benito Rivera y Quiroga (2026-04-27 10:11:08+00:00): Thank you for the explanations and the tutorial. Are the corrections I’ve made now satisfactory? I think the forest area should still remain a multipolygon, however, because it contains an inner ring.
Tomas09 (2026-04-27 20:00:39+00:00): Yes! This element specifically should indeed stay a polygon and is perfect as is (: Good job.
Benito Rivera y Quiroga (2026-04-29 07:12:04+00:00): Thank you very much. That’s encouraging. I will gradually try to bring the sections I’ve worked on into compliance, but it may take a little time…
MappingMore (2026-04-14 16:14:29+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:181331099
NeisBot (2026-04-12 16:54:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 7 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/1127721198 v3 | 4 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1127721196 v5 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/1376031327 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=181240486
grol1 (2026-04-12 17:38:42+00:00): Sorry, I probably made an error when editing a path.
I could delete the point referred by node/1376031327 v4.
But I don't see the problem with the 2 other items you mention: way/1127721198 v3 | 4 crossings
way/1127721196 v5 | 3 crossings
Tomas09 (2026-04-12 16:53:30+00:00): Sorry for the untagged ways. A JOSM plugin had a bug and I had to either restart JOSM without saving or upload the incomplete changeset /:
NeisRevert (2026-04-13 05:45:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/181257963
where the comment is: "Revert test edits"
Piskvor (2026-04-13 12:00:38+00:00): Dvě zastávky Lihovar s local_ref=C, dvě s local_ref=D? Asi se to ještě změní, až dostanou ref:pid se zahájením provozu. 

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2nCK
Bilykralik16 (2026-04-14 20:23:39+00:00): Moje blbost, ty současné bus zastávky jsem přehlédl. Vycházel jsem z: https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1236466262009818&id=100069393686768, tudíž čekám, že tedy dojde ke změně označení právě zastávek pod mostem.
Piskvor (2026-04-16 12:33:54+00:00): No zatím je to teda značně divoký. Sloupky A-G, a pak 12 a 13.

https://i.supaimg.com/e0bf9539-6d92-450d-8b28-1f6db1b029e0/1670a5a3-419b-417e-bd51-d1276289fcb9.jpg
Piskvor (2026-04-17 18:38:49+00:00): Zjevně nahoře zůstane C, a dole bude F. 

https://i.supaimg.com/e0bf9539-6d92-450d-8b28-1f6db1b029e0/424e09cd-cac2-4e07-8569-6ee3192fa791.jpg