piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2023-02-28 08:47:46+00:00): Hi Leonardo ,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-67.09013&lat=-17.95233&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132511925

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Leonardo Gutierrez (2023-04-18 15:44:45+00:00): Dear Guido,

I hope this message finds you well. Firstly, I would like to extend my sincere gratitude for your interest in our work. Your attention to detail is greatly appreciated.

I must confess that we recently encountered an error in our system, which we are currently working hard to rectify. This error was inadvertently caused by one of our team members who uploaded a set of data with an outdated version, resulting in overlapping routes. As a result, you may have noticed that some errors have been assigned to us, even though we did not create them.

However, I want to assure you that this is precisely what we are striving to fix, as it is a nightmare for public transport routing. Our team has recently launched a new public transport app in Oruro, and we invite you to take a look at it here: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.quirquirutas.app&hl=es_CO&gl=US&pli=1

I want to emphasize that we take full responsibility for the mistake, and we are continuously improving our processes to ensure that such errors do not happen again. We are a team of dedicated professionals who work tirelessly to provide the best service possible.

Once again, thank you for your interest in our work, and please do not hesitate to reach out to us if you have any further questions.
JJIglesias (2023-04-18 23:32:53+00:00): Congrats to both, for the insterest of fixing possible errors in the database caused sometimes for improper use of the Q.A. tools both in ID and/or JOSM. That's the true meaning of colaborative mapping.
Thanks to Guido and Leonardo, for the good williness.
Happy Mapping and Best Regards
JJ
BCNorwich (2023-02-14 08:00:33+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Although your POI "Pet Guinea pigs" does not cause harm to the OSM database, it's not really what a live worldwide database is for. You could save the POI to your device, or compile your own little map offline.

Regards Bernard.
RedEyedVireo (2023-02-13 22:45:44+00:00): Also source=Local Knowledge.

Forgot to add than when I uploaded this changeset.
eggie (2023-02-14 05:26:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-02-14 05:27:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
sannkc (2023-02-14 00:22:28+00:00): *missing
JJIglesias (2023-02-14 06:49:32+00:00): Hi. Could I inquire why are you adding data in one Changeset, and later deleting such data in another Changeset? I was not able to find any reference to #teachosm-project-1501. Is this some kind of training? If so I suggest that do not edit the heavy urban enviroment, and look more for parks or unhabited areas for practicing mapping.
Thanks and Best Regards
JJ
kauevestena (2023-02-14 11:16:07+00:00): No problem Julio it's always nice to meet an experienced mapper that takes care of the map! 

The issue with creating-then-deleting was on the account on mapping what was meant to be a public infrastructure, but then just after mapping I've realized the gate thus meaning that was actually a private area. Was a misjudgement. I was editing as a demonstration of sidewalk mapping, more details on the project: https://tasks.teachosm.org/projects/1501 , It is part of an activity coordinated with an equip from UMSA.

Best regards,
Kauê
JJIglesias (2023-02-14 22:51:11+00:00): As a practice, the local community acepted to not include sidewalks for many reasons in particular for the poor quality and offset of the imagery available for ours cities. Said this, do NOT preclude that several more open areas like parks that have clear views could be mapped with path, footways or sidewalks as applicable. As such, and otherwise indicated all traffic ways in OSM has sidewalks as de facto, so it could not make much difference for navigation porpouses, if the blocks sidewalks are drawn or not.

The same applies to the drawing of city blocks, that is just more lines in the map, if they do not have any identification, and in bolivia that standard do not exist so far. So we have some "ways of mapping" being enforced unilaterally by some mappers without the consensus of the comunity.

Please review and advise

BsRgds
JJ
kauevestena (2023-02-14 23:29:04+00:00): Well, I understand and respect the decision of the community, I can revert all my changesets there in Bolivia with no bad feelings! 

I was thinking that alongside with the invitation to do a lecture on the theme there were the approval of the community to map it. There are people of UMSA interested on this type of mapping, but I don't know the state of conversations amongst the OSM Bolivia.

Well, respect for local communities always comes first, but I strongly disagree that there are no difference on drawing sidewalks as separate geometries, it's way more about the details that you can put there, like surface=*, smoothness=*, types of kerbs, width=* and so on, please give a look on my lecture: https://rebrand.ly/mapealivre_curso_acessibilidad3 (you can change "3" at the end of the link to see part 1 and 2). It's about detailed mapping for accessibility, that is a very important subject.

I am currently working on a project to create a full-fledged pedestrian networks inventory, give a look, hope you like it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Opensidewalkmap 

Best Regards,
Kauê
JJIglesias (2023-02-15 06:08:41+00:00): We are not requiring at all that your revert, neither we will do any reversion of such data, despite the agreements that we may has reach. Good data is welcome. Our concern is related to the quality and deficiencies of the existing data and not add more (even good) over data that needs a lot of improvements.

About the "interest" of the UMSA we have strong concerns that their interest are driven for "individual goals" unrelated to the good of the map. Their mapping activities are more Social Media Fanfare than actual mapping. And they never considered the priorities and needs of the map of the country that goes far beyond than sidewalks and park benches. 

In a recent tweet about this "Fanfared Projects" we suggest that how about an effort to include in the map of Bolivia the more of 9000 official human settlements still not included in the map, or the more of 12000 schools still not included, or the more of 2400 Health Centers still not included. We believe that sidewalks are ok, but is not more important critical data? data that "Visualize" people? their critical resources and needs?

As an example. La Paz is a city with several needs of fresh water and is served by several Reservoirs, Lakes and other water bodies. The mapping of such resources has NO colaboration at all from this kind of "iniciatives" that work as stand alone entities and islands, and that the time has proved that they will eventually fade and dissapear, becuase they are not looking the "higher goal", but the individual and more "mediatic" one.

Congrats for your project, wish you the best; but for now our project is named #Bolivia (1.09 Million Square Kilometers)

BsRgds
JJ
kauevestena (2023-02-16 13:19:57+00:00): Thank you for your kind considerations, I understood everything you said, and hope that this relationships improve in a possible future alongside the best for the mapping of Bolivia in general. 

With that being said can you point me some places or projects in order to me help a little with the mapping? I can also create Tasking Manager projects, to help on the mapping management. You can contact me by DM.

Best wishes,
Kauê
JJIglesias (2023-02-16 20:58:50+00:00): Thanks Kaue, will contact you by DM
BsRgds
JJ
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-28 09:28:21+00:00): Do not make "temporary" changes to the map.  You should map exactly what is on the ground, correctly, not changing things for a game.  That game should pull it all correctly when the correct tags are used.

Please elaborate on why you are making temporary changes.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-14 06:18:14+00:00): What exactly did you do?

Please be more elaborate in your changeset notes.  What did you do and why?
marczoutendijk (2023-02-15 20:00:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6863
FTA (2023-02-14 00:11:20+00:00): Whoopsie, quick double click. Comment is "Tracing power lines and adding parking". Source is Bing aerial and survey.
NorthCrab (2023-02-14 01:37:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1144981319
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10656469871
Gdzie można uzyskać permit na przejazd tymi trasami?
pan_borsuk (2023-02-14 12:27:29+00:00): znam naczelnika klubu piłkarskiego. jest też zagorzałym fanem koni. w ramach święta sportu na pewno wyrazi zgodę

a to drugie to do leśniczego z Piły Kościeleckiej. mamy tu bardzo mocno "scenę" jazdy konnej (Płaza/Bolęcin/Kościelec)
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-16 01:21:35+00:00): Is there a reason you converted roadways to cartpaths?

This changeset has been reverted due to an improper edit.
Adam_Piszczek (2023-02-23 08:34:31+00:00): Co ty tu rysujesz przecież już jest DDR
VA00 (2023-02-23 09:03:05+00:00): Bez sensu rysować duplikat, DDR to totalny badziew. Chyba że na zlecenie UM poprawiasz statystyki długości infry rowerowej...
pan_borsuk (2023-02-24 11:30:14+00:00): jakim cudem pojawił się tu duplikat 😮. jak zaczynałem rysować to żadnych niebieskich kreseczek nie widziałem.. chyba że była pokryta z warstwą chodnika pieszego, ale nie było by to zgodne z rozmieszczeniem przecież..
pan_borsuk (2023-02-24 11:30:38+00:00): biorę sie za naprawę 🔧
pan_borsuk (2023-02-24 11:40:50+00:00): Endrju. nie rozumiem jednak. na mapie renderują się na niebiesko. a w trybie edycji jest poprawnie i zgodnie ze stanem faktycznym.

i tez pytanie czym różni sie chodnik od ścieżki dla pieszych 🤔

ścieżka dla pieszych to chyba gdzieś przy rzece/na osiedlu w lesie górach itp. a przy jezdni to chyba chodniki.. hmm

looknij w edycję i powiedz mi proszę gdzie błąd zrobiłem
VA00 (2023-02-24 12:40:07+00:00): Są 2 techniki mapowania CPR-ów z jakoś wizualnie rozdzieloną częścią dla pieszych i rowerów. Wcześniej była jedna linia (dlatego highway=path, czasem highway=cycleway, jeżeli CPR ma przeznaczenie głównie rowerowe, a tu tak nie jest), którą można dodatkowo otagować tak aby rozróżnić nawierzchnię. Tu nie miało to sensu bo tzw ,,asfalt'' tutaj to kompletny syf, nienadający się do jazdy rowerem. Szkoda zachodu,
smoothness=good to jest pod szosę, każ tu szosowcowi przejechać, to Cię będzie przeklinał. Nawet intermediate do dla mnie za wysoko, tam jest jakiś papier ścierny, nie daj boże zahamować z poślizgiem to opona do wyrzucenia. 


Można to zrobić tak jak jest teraz, ALE:
1) 2x więcej roboty, np: tag winter_service, lit. smoothness, surface itp.  musi być wprowadzany 2x. 
2) bardzo ciężko sensownie zrobić wjazdy/wyjazdy (tu akurat się da)
3) nawigacja głupieje

Ale jak chcesz się bawić, to Twoja sprawa. I nie dawaj access=no. Kwestii ruchu konnego na CPR to chyba nawet TK by nie rozstrzygnął... to nie Arizona.
jmaspons (2023-03-01 17:41:27+00:00): Hola, gràcies per les contribucions i benvingut/da a OSM! Segueixo la vostra campanya i em sembla molt necessària. Tanmateix, openstreetmap pretén representar la realitat i si, malauradament, encara queden municipis del principat amb topònims franquistes, cal mantenir-los a l'etiqueta «name» fins que es faci el canvi. Sí que em sembla adequat afegir la forma correcta a l'etiqueta «name:ca» que serveix per afegir el nom en català. Així doncs, mentre la vostra campanya no aconsegueixi èxits al món real, cal revertir els canvis de l'etiqueta «name». El dia que puguem celebrar la normalització d'aquests topònims, caldria afegir els antics a l'etiqueta «old_name» per facilitar que els usuaris despistats trobin el que busquen. També us animo a obrir debats sobre el tema a https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/lang-ca/69 o als diversos canals de la comunitat catalana.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132514534
jmaspons (2023-03-01 17:44:32+00:00): El mateix criteri també s'ha d'aplicar a tots els altres conjunts de canvis en que encara no s'hagi oficialitzat el canvi de topònims excepte per elements del mapa que a la realitat apareguin amb la forma correcte com ara plaques de carrers, cartells, etc. ( https://osmcha.org/?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22CabassersOrg%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22CabassersOrg%22%7D%5D%7D )
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-14 01:10:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262385421

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab (2023-02-14 02:57:30+00:00): Poprawione
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-14 01:10:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10656495299

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-16 01:23:15+00:00): Reverting changeset since roadways were imporperly changed to cartpaths.
eggie (2023-02-14 05:36:03+00:00): Hi Rama...

This is a private single parkinglot in the garden.  ...  (not public). It's not a parking infact. 

You mapped this as an area and a node..  twice.
I removed your contribution. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132515961

Greetz,
eggie
Rama Zatriya Galih Panuntun (2023-02-14 07:12:35+00:00): Oh ya thanks for the explain mate!
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-16 01:19:44+00:00): Cartpaths were converted to roadway...  This edit is being reverted due to vandalism and improper edits.  Please do not change roadways to cartpaths as this is not correct.
adrianojbr (2023-02-15 18:55:04+00:00): Olá, LThiesen!

1. Por que você alterou a via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/928115642 para track?

2. Fiz ajustes nessa via de estacionamento https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970338243 com base nas imagens da Maxar que estão mais atualizadas.

3. Ressalto o cuidado com o alinhamento de vias (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2199474765).

Abraço!

Abraço!
adrianojbr (2023-02-15 18:08:23+00:00): Olá, LThiesen!

Algumas observações:

1. Cuidado ao alinhar elementos, especialmente vias, com base exclusivamente em imagens de satélite. Essas contém distorções, principalmente porque são representações em 2D de um mundo em 3D, mais informações em: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Align_aerial_imagery_before_tracing

Se uma região está desalinhada e precisa de correção, o ideal é corrigir o alinhamento de todos os elementos envolvidos, a fim que se mantenha um alinhamento relativo entre eles (por exemplo, ao corrigir o alinhamento de uma via cuidar para o ponto de ônibus não ficar do lado errado da rua ou a via ficar sobre as casas).

Por exemplo, esses pontos https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1792570935/ e https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1792570989/ destoam dos elementos em volta, fazendo com que haja uma curva onde na realidade é uma reta.

2. As vias internas nesse local https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/ não parecem ser corredores de estacionamento service=parking_aisle, devendo ficar somente como higway=service mesmo.

Abraço!
adrianojbr (2023-02-15 18:11:11+00:00): Olá, LThiesen!

Não conheço muito de mapeamento de aeroportos, então a princípio não encontrei erros aqui.

Abraço!
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-19 05:00:32+00:00): Nie wiem czy na forum widziałeś - ale https://matkoniecz.github.io/miejsca_do_odwiedzenia_w_Krakowie_by_mapowac/ jest

Jak pokazuje braki wynikające z przesunięcia danych oficjalnych - daj znać które są gdzie a erratę dodam
kubahahaha (2023-02-19 14:16:52+00:00): Tak, widziałem ale póki co poprawiałem tylko z tych screenów które mi wcześniej wysłałeś.

Tutaj na os. Podwawelskim jest problem, bo Spółdzielnia używa identycznych stojaków jak miasto - np. na ul. Komandosów przy bloku 17 nie mam pojęcia który stojak jest czyj.
Poogarniam jeszcze w najbliższych dniach i może dojdę do tego co jest czyje.
Będę dawał znać na forum
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-20 15:52:56+00:00): > np. na ul. Komandosów przy bloku 17 nie mam pojęcia który stojak jest czyj. 

jak trudno ustalić to można to olać, operator=* nie jest tak istotny
kubahahaha (2023-02-20 15:59:29+00:00): Na screenach tego nie było, ale w mapce którą podesłałeś było słowo "chodnik" i liczba 3 stojaki - to wszystko wyjaśniło i poprawiłem w następnym changesecie.
Tutaj i SM i miasto stawiają takie same.
WC392309 (2023-02-14 20:07:58+00:00): I think this a good idea. However, because 14th street, NW is a main artery that goes to I-395, it should be primary from Thomas Circle to Constitution Avenue, while 15th street should be secondary because it's a only a collector road from K street NW(US 29 through Raoul Wallenberg Place) because it's a major road but doesn't have nearly as much traffic or general importance as 14th street in this dedicated area
mrpulley (2024-06-14 10:58:36+00:00): This edit was incorrect - you shortened the 40 zone at both ends. I've reverted this at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151800314 (checked by survey)
adrianojbr (2023-02-15 19:04:34+00:00): Olá, LThiesen!

A princípio tudo certo

A única ressalva é se essa via (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1041997975) não existe mais?

Abraço!
felipeeugenio (2023-02-14 11:41:10+00:00): Hola Sergio
Bienvenido a OSM y gracias por tus ediciones.
Tuve que rehacer harto de lo que hiciste en La Serena. Tenía hartos errores conceptuales. Te pido por favor darle una mirada para que incorpores cirtas cosas. Puedes unirte al chat de la comunidad también en Telegram, donde discutimos todas estas cosas varias decenas de maperos.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132517139
MxxCon (2023-02-16 01:47:24+00:00): Hello.
When mapping features please pay attention not to glue them to each other unless they are actually attached.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132517193
MxxCon (2023-02-16 01:48:15+00:00): Hello.
Please map features accurate to the satellite imagery. This pool is clearly oval in shape, not rectangular.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132517208
Etersoul (2023-02-18 14:21:47+00:00): Why did you remove the road / u-turn? Do you live near the area? Your removal might cause traffic routing by several apps that use OSM near the area to be mistaken. It doesn't show on the Bing Maps because it was added recently on January 2023. I will uploads the photos as proof on Mapillary and re-add the road. Thanks.
Frans S (2023-03-06 16:06:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.
Don't map buildings over each other.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132517662
Heinz_V (2023-03-11 13:57:21+00:00): You deleted the boundary of Belkotgadhi municipality. Please restore it.
Heinz_V (2023-03-11 13:58:42+00:00): And you deleted also the boundary of Kakani!!!
DiahW IRM-ED (2023-03-14 08:56:28+00:00): Hi, GrabTH_Akanit

Thank you for your mapping contribution. I found a road name gap issue, the street name in this object (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/456381825) differs from the road names connected to it. 

Because I'm only a remote mapper, I need to ask those of you who have local knowledge. Do you have any suggestions for resolving this issue? or does the road segment have a different name than the surrounding roads?

I really appreciate any information and advice you can provide. Thank you and happy mapping!

Kind Regards,
Diah
literan (2023-02-14 17:11:08+00:00): и зачем вы это сделали?
gscholz (2023-02-15 08:05:39+00:00): Hi Paulc8768,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=5.35270&lat=44.43682&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=132518787

As you may know, this kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself about how to edit hiking routes properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking

Kind regards
Guido
Paulc8768 (2023-02-15 08:12:49+00:00): Thanks Guido, yes of course and thanks for the link to the educational resource.
gscholz (2023-02-27 07:44:18+00:00): Hi Paulc8768, 
this error still exits, can you plese fix it?
Guido
Paulc8768 (2023-02-27 08:31:48+00:00): Hi Guido

I deleted the section of trail that was causing the error. Are you suggesting there is more to do to rectify the error? 

Thanks
Paul
gscholz (2023-02-27 09:02:39+00:00): Hi Paul,
If you just look a the OSM inspetor link a provided above, you will find the error:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=5.35270&lat=44.43682&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

Guido
user_6110846 (2023-02-14 06:12:02+00:00): точніша адреса https://kadastr.live/
Frans S (2023-02-14 09:14:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please don't spend time on mapping of traces leading to and ending in farmland (tracks) Focus on through roads. (unclassified)
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2023-02-14 09:14:52+00:00): btw. Your mappings are rather accurate !!
Frans S (2023-02-21 09:58:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 

Please solve first the issues on the issue triangle before you upload your mappings.
Be sure that an object is a building.
You must see the shadow of it.
You mapped 2 walled yard as a building,  In 1 case were no buildings on it, the other had 1 building.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132519672
tesp (2023-02-15 20:03:31+00:00): The contradictory tag is necessary to keep the iD editor from trying to "fix" the name. I'm getting tired of having revert them all the time.