piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MaestroGlanz (2024-05-07 14:31:55+00:00): Deine Edits enthalten zu viele Nodes. Der Waldrand ist nicht die Silhouette des Kronendachs der Bäume, sondern die gedachte Linie am Boden.
So wie hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1279983011
Ich habe hier eine Reihe Knoten entfernt. 

Das würde nicht weiter stören, wenn es nicht die Bearbeitung extrem aufwändig machen würde. 

Ich bin über das hier darauf gestoßen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/47.81507/12.84598 Das schaut alles schön rund aus, aber es gibt die Optik und nicht die logische Struktur wieder.
woodpeck_repair (2024-05-05 18:35:20+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124649834, 124649950, 124650256.
Vivek Dumre (2024-05-10 10:11:57+00:00): Thanks for your contributions to mapping! Your changeset comment and mapping work look impressive. Keep up the good work, and continue to contribute to open mapping projects. Happy mapping! #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150933929
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-25 13:53:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5743878536/history has shop = poultry that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=poultry ? is it seling living poultry, raw poultry meat as food, products for poultry like animal feed? Something else?
Leo Slager (2024-10-26 09:57:45+00:00): See:
https://www.mr-fillet.shop/kip-bestellen

Wich tags would you choose ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-11 10:19:48+00:00): shop=butcher butcher=poultry
Leo Slager (2024-12-11 10:29:04+00:00): Thank you.
I changed it.
kapazao (2024-05-06 13:46:54+00:00): Hola, ¿edición arbitraria, en qué te basas para decir eso?
¿Conoces cómo se nombran las rotondas?
Gracias por revertir sin explicar bien los motivos y los casos concretos que pudieran estar equivocados, que dudo que haya muchos porque revisé cada elemento.
Revierto cambios y te pediría que antes de revertir comentes bien el motivo y esperas al menos una respuesta mía, que fui quien hizo los cambios.
Un saludo
Jordi MF (2024-05-06 14:23:46+00:00): Sin haber comprobado muchos elementos, veo que las rotondas, antes, tenían nombre como 'Calle Camilo José Cela'. Eso es incorrecto según las normas de la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout). Por tanto, es correcto eliminar dichos nombres.

Las rotondas solo deben de tener la etiqueta 'name' si tienen un nombre por sí mismas (Glorieta de..., Rotonda de..., Plaza de...).

Saludos
kaleidoscopica (2025-05-22 01:25:47+00:00): Can you provide any proof that this is an actual beach?
Randi8989 (2025-05-22 17:21:42+00:00): This is a sandy area that the ducks use to get in and out of the river. There is also a large tree on one end of the sandy area
kaleidoscopica (2025-05-23 13:03:57+00:00): Well... I should say, it's pretty clear from the timing and glancing over your other edits that this was a Pokemon Go-inspired addition. 

Even if it does have some sandy particulate, does some sand make a small portion of an inland creek a beach? Would anyone walking by see this and say "Oh, this is a beach?" Common sense tells me no, probably not.
Randi8989 (2025-05-23 17:17:40+00:00): Every since I was a little girl, I have called it the little duck beach. Is it big enough for people? Maybe 1 person but each person has their own interpretation of the world. Remove it if you want but it will alway be the little duck beach to me.
literan (2024-05-06 17:24:33+00:00): во всех адресах ошибка - забыты пробелы
literan (2024-05-06 17:20:03+00:00): криво адреску пишете, забыли пробел
4004 (2024-05-05 22:20:58+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
так понимаю, Октябрьский раён - имя собственное этих часов?
4004 (2024-05-05 22:24:30+00:00): со спутника и снимков мапиллари ничего там правда не вижу
GavriKos (2024-05-06 08:34:47+00:00): Да, на них прямо написано - "Октябрьский район, Минск". Типа стеллы района.

Посмотрите панорамы яндекса - они там есть. 

Ну и фото - http://cloud.gk-home1.click/s/8a5DyPzjLmXgc2w
4004 (2024-05-06 18:11:42+00:00): за фото, спасибо, этого ракурса на мапиллари нету, ну и продрал глаза и увидел на снимке Есри тоже.
перетегировал в солнечные часы, напись все же думаю не имя собственное часов, поэтому перенес в inscription
DD1GJ (2024-05-06 07:18:40+00:00): Beachvollyball richtig eingetragen, ist kein Strand.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1279995817/history

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
eggie (2024-05-05 20:13:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback..   Alle begin is moeilijk. barrier=hekomheiding doet helemaal niets in OSM.  Alle tags liggen vast en zijn UK English  De tagging kun je vinden in de wiki van OSM.
Het zou bv een barrier=gate kunnen zijn met access=private
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-05 20:21:23+00:00): Ik heb wat aangepast  ook aan de sportvelden zodat je deze straks ziet op de kaart.
Mapse
eggie
DD1GJ (2024-05-06 07:11:08+00:00): Hallo Sinustimmy, wieso trägst Du einen normalen Spielplatz nochmals als Strand ein? Ich habe das wieder rückgängig gemacht.

Falls Du damit ein Online-Spiel beeinflussen wolltest: Solche Falscheinträge sind im Projekt unerwünscht.

https://pokemon-go-forum.de/threads/pokemon-go-spieler-zerstoeren-open-streetmaps.3160/
Frans S (2024-05-30 09:49:55+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Inaccurate mapped.
Buildings mapped oversized.
Included the shadow in a mapping.

Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150937049
Taya_S (2024-05-06 10:59:46+00:00): Reverted. OSM is not the place for ficticious edits.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150959050
lipuma (2024-05-06 13:50:46+00:00): Hallo Thomas, ik zie dat je een heleboel parkeerplekken hebt gemapt, ziet er netjes uit. Maar, het is niet de bedoeling dat elk parkeervak wordt gemapt als een amenity=parking. Probeer amenity=parking zo groot mogelijk te maken en binnen deze way amenity=parking_space te mappen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space

Zie hier een voorbeeld:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/53.21461/5.80239
lipuma (2024-05-06 13:52:41+00:00): Eigenlijk zoals bij de Vossenburchkade (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48790600)
Thomas_123 (2024-05-07 11:28:01+00:00): Hoi Fincent,
Je hebt helemaal gelijk... ik vermoed dat het copieren met Gridlify niet helemaal goed is gegaan. Ik het repareren!
Dank je wel voor je oplettendheid.
Thomas
lipuma (2024-05-07 12:28:55+00:00): Top! En excuses dat ik het uitlegde alsof je het niet begreep, want je werk bij andere parkeerplaatsen ziet er prachtig uit, maar dit zag ik pas naderhand...
Ziemowit Zabawa (2024-05-05 20:58:09+00:00): Hi, fellow Catalans and Spaniards! Greetings from Poland! :)
I was on a trip to Lloret de Mar and of course I couldn't forget about OSM while going to Barcelona when I noticed an unfinished section of C-32. I don't think that it's correct to tag this as highway=construction since it's obviously finished. In Poland when a road is finished, unused, but further construction is underway or will be reasonably soon, we tag that as highway=motorway and access=no, just like S1 near Żywiec (OSM way 92315741). But I did some research and it seems like C-32 won't be extended for... quite a while? If that happens, we tag those roads as highway=service, access=no and proposed:highway=motorway. Look at the N-S route in Warsaw (OSM way 124271723) or S7/S74 junction near Kielce (OSM way 235633429; note the changeset description).
We've got that tagging scheme established since there's quite a bunch of expressway construction going on in Poland for a couple of years. We tried to make this tagging scheme accurate and reflecting the general OSM tagging convention. Feel free to "import" it to the rest of Catalonia and Spain if you liked it :)
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:49:47+00:00): hot springs should be tagged as natural=spring or natural=hot_spring. The name tag should only be used if the feature has a posted name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150937415
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:51:22+00:00): Fixed.
woodpeck (2024-05-05 20:18:09+00:00): Siehe Kommentare in  CS 115882204
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-06 20:00:17+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150953468
Frans S (2024-05-07 09:27:52+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
Oversized mapped. Mapped a complete 
Buildings inaccurate mapped. 
Just a rectangular where the building has complex  corners
clustered buildings. 
Connected nodes of a building to other buildings.
Bad mappings are removed. need to be mapped again.



Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150937748
ciaoQuentin (2024-05-13 14:59:07+00:00): Salut,
Est-ce que l'atelier propose des sessions de mécanique en mode autoréparation ? Si, oui, c'est super, car je ne connaissais pas. Si non, le tag service:bicycle:diy n'est pas approprié.
Supaplex030 (2024-05-06 19:38:34+00:00): Hallo momabebra, auch hier in deinen Changesets entlang der Südostallee hast du systemtisch viele Bordsteinkanten in falscher Richtung gezogen (vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150857735).

Zudem hast du einige Straßenparkplätze als Flächen gemappt und sie als "Parkbuchten" ("street_side") getaggt, obwohl es sich um Parkplätze auf der Fahrbahn ("lane") handelt. Es wäre in diesem Fall zudem gut gewesen, die Parkrauminformationen an der Straßenlinie zu entfernen bzw. durch "parking*=separate" zu ersetzen, damit der Parkraum nicht redundant erfasst ist.

Das wäre alles nicht so schlimm – wenn man dich erreichen könnte, um dich auf solche Fehlerchen aufmerksam zu machen, damit sie nicht immer wieder passieren. Aber das ist leider nicht möglich.

lg, Alex
Supaplex030 (2024-05-06 19:40:18+00:00): P.S. Ich habe diese Fehler an dieser Stelle bereits korrigiert.
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-05 20:57:54+00:00): Hello, you changed this park into a beach. This is not a correct change and as such I am reverting it back.
flohoff (2024-05-06 09:23:48+00:00): Moin,
hast du eine idee warum das routing jetzt den Durchgangsverkehr durch den Kirchweg schickt. Ich denke das ist ja nicht so gewollt.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=605690,767678#52.4155,8.67182,16z

Flo
Langlaeufer (2024-05-06 11:39:28+00:00): Ich gehe mal davon aus, das dein Router bei maxspeed:type=rural 100 km/h ansetzt. Vorher hatte er dort keine auswertbare maxspeed-Angabe
Langlaeufer (2024-05-06 11:40:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335338935/history
Langlaeufer (2024-05-06 11:40:32+00:00): Die 100 km/h hattest du ja vor einiger Zeit entfernt.
Langlaeufer (2024-05-06 11:48:37+00:00): Ist doch aber auch klar der schnellere Weg. Kürzer, und nur zur Hälfte innerorts - keine 70 km Einschränkung
GerdP (2024-05-07 18:03:34+00:00): Bei einigen der geänderten Wege ist ein access=private gesetzt. Das steht doch irgendwie im Konflikt mit z.B. maxspeed:type=DE:rural ?
Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979306937
Langlaeufer (2024-05-07 18:51:48+00:00): Richtig das ist ein Konflikt, aber auch  maxspeed=100, steht im Konflikt mit service=driveway und private. Meine Bearbeitung hat daran nichts wesentlich verändert. Die Fälle könnte man suchen und maxspeed entfernen, weil das an einer Zufahrt eh keinen Sinn macht.
Langlaeufer (2024-05-07 18:57:49+00:00): Davon betroffen sind 6 Wege rural und 8 Wege urban, das kann man händisch lösen.
GerdP (2024-05-07 19:04:49+00:00): Klar, ich wollte nur darauf hinweisen, weil im ursprünglichen Kommentar "soweit konsistent" steht und die alten Daten waren halt schon inkonsistent.
Langlaeufer (2024-05-07 19:07:30+00:00): ich hab die maxspeed-Angaben auf Konsistenz geprüft nicht access und auch nicht service
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-05 20:50:18+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1280013307

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
emvee (2024-05-05 21:04:55+00:00): Ook deze changeset had weer 2 fietsroutes gebroken, opgelost in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150939147
eggie (2024-05-06 04:51:28+00:00): Hoi.. Tip..
Splits je misschien op twee plaatsen tegelijk?
Dan gaat het zelfs met Josm wel eens fout.
Verder laad ik alle routerelaties voordat ik splits.
Groet..
eggie
emvee (2024-05-06 20:36:59+00:00): Het probleem is dat de route-relaties niet geladen zijn, zie ook https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/4142#comment:30
eggie (2024-05-06 20:46:50+00:00): Oke....   Dan blijft het inderdaad wonderlijk.
Zelf gebruik ik die doorlopende download niet, maar laadt gewoon de relaties eerst allemaal.
En dan gaat het bij checken nog wel eens fout blijkt dan.
emvee (2024-05-06 21:03:28+00:00): > Dan blijft het inderdaad wonderlijk.

Niet echt, ik snap hoe het gebeurd, een "sparse" gedownloade wegen ergens in splitsen. Een download rond het punt waar je wilt splitsen helpt niet tenzij er een punt van de weg die je wilt splitsen in die download zit.

Nu ik het weet ga ik groter downloaden maar het blijft beter als josm gewoon de problemen voorkomt.
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-25 15:34:36+00:00): Wie besprochen, HW=footway mit bicycle=designated, das passt nicht zusammen. Bitte um Korrektur.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316767669

Grüße
rskedgell (2024-07-25 13:32:12+00:00): That wasn't OSM's problem, until you added a fictitious access restriction. Reverted.
vJack (2024-05-05 21:16:16+00:00): Cześć,
Twoje zmiany to przepisywanie punktów prosto z Google Maps, które na dodatek są czasami błędne lub nie powinny się znaleźć na mapach OSM. Prosiłbym o zapoznanie się z zasadami mapowania w OSM przed dalszymi zmianami.
HolgerJeromin (2024-09-08 06:21:58+00:00): Ist deine eingetragene Baustelle das neue Sennebad?
Würde von der ALKIS Hausnummer passen
bielebog (2024-09-08 06:32:17+00:00): Möglich. Gebauer inpiziert hab ich die Baustelle nicht, nur von der Sennestraße aus kurz rübergeknipst.
Hufkratzer (2024-05-06 20:11:07+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1280022172 looks like a riding arena (similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1170874739), but you habe tagged it as a riding centre (leisure=horse_riding), compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aleisure%3Dhorse_riding

See also previous discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150939363
Langlaeufer (2025-12-03 13:42:41+00:00): Kannst du Hausnummern 40A-F nochmal prüfen ob die Richtung der Nummerierung stimmt. Laut ALKIS genau andersherum.
emersonveenstra (2024-05-21 11:53:02+00:00): Hello,

This changeset duplicated dozens of already existing nodes and ways. You can see the full list using Osmose: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=7&lat=43.895&lon=-107.273&level=1&country=usa_arizona&loc=11/33.3889/-111.9068&item=1230 each pin is where you duplicated an object. Could you please go through and remove all these duplicates? Thanks!
Manuele R (2024-05-06 19:38:32+00:00): Ciao, 
non ho capito benissimo quale siano state le tue intenzioni...ho visto che a Giubiasco, via Ferriere hai tolto le "stop_position" e le hai trasformate in "platform", anche se queste esistevano già.
Ogni punto di fermata deve avere una Platform e può avere una stop_position.
Saluti
aixbrick (2024-07-10 16:27:40+00:00): Hello,
I deleted the "access=agricultural" from two ways for the second time (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153791498).
"access=agricultural" is mostly wrong, please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dagricultural#Possible_tagging_mistakes.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.761575899998&lng=6.0273597000013&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=1940319522986399 does not show a sign indicating any access rules.
Regards
Yunkers (2024-05-06 15:09:08+00:00): Hej, czy jesteś w stanie wrzucić odpowiedź UM Ustki (oraz Zakopanego bo były też tam zmiany)?
vJack (2024-05-06 00:01:19+00:00): Takie pytanie do zmian. Czy ref=21 nie powinno czasem zostać do samego portu skoro DK21 tamtędy prowadzi?
vJack (2024-05-06 00:07:16+00:00): DK21 kończy się w porcie, a nie na moście
vJack (2024-05-06 00:26:36+00:00): Źródło?
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2024-05-06 13:36:03+00:00): Hi! Thanks for the updates. Did you use the offset 0.6,-1.54 like explained here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Montr%C3%A9al (Bing Maps Offset)
WoodWoseWulf (2024-05-06 11:46:26+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! You added a beach over some buildings, so I went ahead and removed it.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-07 14:32:53+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150960890
MxxCon (2024-05-09 01:15:58+00:00): Hello.
Please note that it's incorrect to tag these nodes as kerbs since they are NOT kerbs. The way you tagged these nodes makes it so that when somebody is being a routed from one sidewalk turning a corner to another sidewalk they are routed through a kerb, but in reality that's not the case. Kerbs should be tagged where they actually are.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150943241
tastrax (2024-05-08 08:11:18+00:00): Hi folks - generally a driveway into a house would be considered 'permissive' . This means that the owner allows access until refused. This allows for deliveries etc. If there is a sign specifically stating the driveway is Private or No Entry then it can be tagged as private. Cheers
tastrax (2024-05-08 08:13:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Robin Zyx (2024-05-06 04:30:06+00:00): Any particular reason you deleted the getir business name from the corner at 2681 B'way?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150943952
IraGersh (2024-05-06 13:22:07+00:00): I was told it was closed and an article in the NYT confirmed that Getir had closed all its US stores as of May 1.
Also the guy that told me it was empty, threw out all the trash they left behind in front of the store.
Robin Zyx (2024-05-06 14:28:45+00:00): Surprising. I thought I saw the place open as usual a couple days ago. Very strange that my neighbors have been quiet about it closing down.
IraGersh (2024-05-06 15:26:20+00:00): It is strange.  I never much thought about it as I'm rarely on that stretch of Broadway, but Terence came over to me yesterday while I was planting flowers in tree beds on 102nd between WEA and Broadway to tell me about it and how he had picked up all the trash they and sanitation left.
IraGersh (2024-05-06 15:27:36+00:00): So its no longer a dark store unless another one moves in.  Terence also told me, that Getir had been gotten penalties or something from FDNY for lack of a sprinkler system.
Robin Zyx (2024-05-06 15:38:50+00:00): Dunno about the sprinkler system, but they got dinged late last year due to something related to e-bike batteries.
IraGersh (2024-05-06 15:48:04+00:00): Yes. He mentioned the bike batteries and I believe there was a photo in the West Side Rag of a wire rack set up as a charging system.
Robin Zyx (2024-05-06 20:56:05+00:00): Dark and locked up this afternoon. Still some stuff in there if you need some wire shelving or a palette of toilet paper. Well, let's hope the storefront doesn't stay empty 6.5 years like the last time it was vacant.
MxxCon (2024-05-09 01:24:24+00:00): I see many articles online that Getir pulled out of every market other than Turkey. 
And apparently they now own FreshDirect and it'll continue to operate as is.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150943952
IraGersh (2024-05-09 01:46:22+00:00): Getir definitely pulled out of that building.  I did not change anything else related to Getir.
Robin Zyx (2024-05-09 02:49:55+00:00): Ira, I think very few getir stores were marked on OSM. MxxCon and I had a discussion some months ago when I added this one and the Gopuff across the street to the map because it was (still is?) somewhat unsettled how to handle dark_stores on OSM.
IraGersh (2024-05-09 17:55:03+00:00): OSM had a key for dark_stores so I used it.  Yes.  there weren't many marked as such on OSM, but I'm finding that with a lot of things.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-06 19:58:37+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150949778
hoserab (2024-05-06 20:09:39+00:00): *straightened 50th Avenue
Glassman (2024-05-06 18:57:06+00:00): I reverted the beach. This is a river. If you want to add a beach, select the  sandy area next to the water line and draw in the beach.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150944263
wolfy1339 (2024-05-06 21:05:17+00:00): hi, can you please limit your changesets to smaller areas.

The changes you made are great, just need to remember to keep the bounding box more local.

Also, please use proper source tags, as surveying across 2 continents is hard and unlikely
IdeallyGrey (2024-05-06 21:17:08+00:00): My bad! I was using the Street Complete app, and was filling in some info around places I've stayed. Didn't realize what source tag it used by default. Thanks for your feedback.
Tommybara (2024-05-06 04:09:16+00:00): Vấn đề mấy chữ Đăk/Đắk này tôi nghĩ địa phương họ viết sao thì mình cứ viết vậy. Ở Kon Tum họ không thêm dấu sắc, nên viết là "Đăk", còn Đắk Lắk, Đắk Nông thì có dấu sắc. Thổ ngữ mỗi vùng miền khác nhau, ở Lâm Đồng thì chữ Đăk/Đắk này là Đa/Đạ. Cũng giống như Cư/Chư vậy, Đắk Lắk thì viết là "Cư" còn Gia Lai, Kon Tum thì là "Chư". Hay Ea/Ia nữa.
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-11 11:57:30+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Thank you for accurately mapping these buildings. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150944756
felipeeugenio (2024-05-06 20:30:46+00:00): Hola.
En este caso si, pero ojo que no todos los corredores serían busway. Tiene mucho que ver con la segregación y con el hecho de que, en algunos casos, vehículos particulares si pueden meterse a estas vías.

Vamos a estudiar hacer los cambios de manera masiva.

saludos
tekim (2024-05-06 13:59:42+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150966858
tekim (2024-05-06 14:01:01+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150966902
tekim (2024-05-06 14:02:02+00:00): reverting a changeset that contains fake edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150966939