piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 15:12:56+00:00): welcome to OSM. PLease upload your work every 5-15 minutes rather than uploadign each footprint individually. This saves time saving and uploading your work and makes it easier for others to review it. A good changeset should have a logical theme and the edits should be in close geographical proximity. E.g. you could have mapped multiple or even all the buildings in this settlement and then uploaded your changes. --- Please read my project comments regarding building digitisation. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403046
Gregory Peony (2025-07-14 23:31:27+00:00): This footprint envelopes multple buildings. Each footprint should represent an individual building. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403104
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 15:56:15+00:00): The Eastern footprint represents a building while the western one represents a likely garden. Beware that walls can cast shadows similar to buildings; use context clues to help you determine which is which.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403109
Gregory Peony (2025-07-14 16:19:36+00:00): Hi, Marie. The footprints you mapped here are valid and appropriately squared. The western one is inaccurate the Easterone is almost accurate but is slightly too long see how I mapped them in Changeset: 168925772. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403145
Gregory Peony (2025-07-14 16:29:42+00:00): the footprins you added here are likely temporal yurts and should not have been mapped. You corectly modified the residential area to avoid overlap with the footprints you added.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403175
Langlaeufer (2025-07-02 16:43:46+00:00): dürfen dort andere Fahrzeuge als Radfahrer fahren? Wenn ja service, sonst path. Wenn blau beschildert wird, dann bicycle/foot=designated 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403197
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 21:43:37+00:00): footprints correctly identified and well mapped, but they should not share nodes with landuse areas nor highways. Hold alt to prevent your cursor from snapping to existing data. See my resolution in Changeset: 168815108
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403209
Gregory Peony (2025-07-13 20:45:49+00:00): You correctly identified buildings in the imagery but the footprints you mapped are inaccurate (oversized). You reduced the accuracy of some existing footprints. Take care to make contributions that others can build upon. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403237
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 15:54:17+00:00): The western footprint is oversized, the southern one is a garden not a building and the eastern one is actually square not round; you can tell becasue of the roof colour. Buildings with blue roofs in this area do not tend to be round. Determine how the scene is lit and use that information to aid your interpretation.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403281
Gregory Peony (2025-07-14 23:25:42+00:00): You're identifying buildings in the imagery but they're generally slightly oversized. Read my project comment regarding building mapping. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403363
Gregory Peony (2025-07-02 14:58:17+00:00): See my project comment and reference the project insructions. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403390
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 21:56:44+00:00): The vast majority of footpritns in the North here are temporal yurts and should not be mapped as they will likely not be there for long.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403391
Gregory Peony (2025-07-14 16:21:36+00:00): Hi Charlotte, the footprint you added my represent a temporal yurt and perhaps should not have been added. It has been rounded correctly but is oversized. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403507
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 21:15:32+00:00): A valid but oversized footprint. Please see my project comment about accurate footprint mapping. See Changeset: 168814513 for how I mapped it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403533
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 15:51:51+00:00): You were doing the right thing by modifying the residential area and improved its geometry, but it and a highway share nodes with buildings. Hold alt while mapping to prevent this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403555
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 16:37:40+00:00): Though the imagery allows them to be mapped more accurately all the round footprints you added here are valid i.e. they represent round buildings in the imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403608
Gregory Peony (2025-07-14 23:07:26+00:00): The footprints you mapped likely represent temporal yurts and should not have been mapped. Footprints should represent buildings and not barriers like hedges. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403682
Gregory Peony (2025-07-14 23:07:27+00:00): The footprints you mapped likely represent temporal yurts and should not have been mapped. Footprints should represent buildings and not barriers like hedges. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403682
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 15:50:06+00:00): The footprint I flagged contains multiple buildings. Map one building per footprint. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168403794
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 15:49:10+00:00): These footprints are generally the correct shape but are oversized. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404037
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 17:54:16+00:00): The 5 Southern most footprints here are fairly accurate though should be squared (q). In the North you deleted and replace footprints with lower quality ones. Deletion is sometimes the best option, but not always. Here the buildings could have been moved (m) to align them with ESRI imagery rather than mapping from scratch (provided they were accurate). Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404130
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 18:09:33+00:00): Don't worry about having deleted those footprints; I restored them.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404130
Gregory Peony (2025-07-11 21:45:48+00:00): The square footprints are invalid and inaccurate. You correctly identified round buildings in imagery but they are generally oversized; roofs tend to overhang walls somewhat. Good job modifying the  highway to prevent it from overlapping the buildings you added.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404148
tuan_gsm (2025-07-16 02:47:35+00:00): This highway not yet built?
You have checked before fixing it
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 15:47:17+00:00): The shape of the footpritns you added here appears correct. THe footprint I flagged is actually a tree; you can tell becasue it overlaps a square building's footprint so a building could not fit there.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404283
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 15:23:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The round buildings in the SW and the Western most square footprint are well mapped. More like that in future please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404337
NeisBot (2025-07-02 15:17:02+00:00): Hi ILBZH, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project!

To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. This will make it easier for the community to follow your adjustments. You can find some helpful tips on good comments here: https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Added new buildings by creating nodes and ways, tagging them as buildings."

PS: I’ve also sent this message via the OSM messaging system for your convenience.

#HelpfulComment #Gibberish #AIgenerated
Gregory Peony (2025-07-12 15:48:13+00:00): You created shared nodes between footprints and the area. Read mt project comments to see how to prevent this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404547
eggie (2025-07-02 14:56:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  De hoofdtag is amenity=drinking_water
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water

De rest is specificatie
Dit doet niets in OSM. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-07-02 14:58:01+00:00): Als bovenstaand aangepast
fs_LT (2025-07-03 06:12:02+00:00): Der "Kanonenschießplatz" ist wie die Stellen wo hin und wieder mal ein mobiler Blitzer steht. Ist der "Kanonenschießplatz" beschildert, in natura ersichtlich, ein Bauwerk, vor Ort prüfbar ...? Wenn nicht, ist es nichts für OSM?

Schau dir bitte mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice an, dort kommen viele der Dinge (Beschreibung im name-tag, temporäre Dinge, nicht prüfbare Dinge uvm.) vor, über die wir in letzter Zeit diskutiert haben.
Gregory Peony (2025-07-06 03:09:24+00:00): You digitised what is likely a hedge. There is a building surrounded be the hedge on the Easter side. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404858
Gregory Peony (2025-07-06 02:59:55+00:00): I rated this changeset as bad becasue the end result is still not great, but I have to say very good effort in improving the existing building footprint data. I flagged an accurate footprint mapped by you. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404948
Gregory Peony (2025-07-06 02:51:12+00:00): You deleted what appear mostly to be valid footprints. Don't worry I brought them back.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404994
Gregory Peony (2025-07-06 02:55:28+00:00): I also just saw that you added these footpritns. They are oversized but there are round buildings there in the imagery.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168404994
martien-176 (2025-07-27 08:50:31+00:00): I did a partial revert of this changeset: fixed accidentally moved place node, see cs 169544801
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168405127
Gregory Peony (2025-07-06 02:13:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Most building footpritns have a regular shape. Please press o or q after drawing their approximate shape slightly smaller than the roof. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168405189
lodis (2025-08-15 09:33:03+00:00): Hej, jag tror du gjort ett misstag här, vad kan läsa så är Himmersfjärden det vedertagna namnet på havsviken mellan Mörkö och Södertörn. Skanssundsleden är bara namnet för färjeleden över denna. Se: https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skanssundet 
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Himmerfj%C3%A4rden
Carto'Cité (2025-07-19 17:21:14+00:00): Salut Simon,
Merci pour les corrections, l'essentiel est dans le lot que je suis en train de passer en revue. J'ai contacté un premier contributeur pour lui donner des précisions. Tu as repéré ces modifs en intégrant le VIF je vois, désolé du délai dans la modération 😅
Charles
German C (2025-07-03 03:12:55+00:00): Hola Lolj, espero que estes bien, sería chévere si dentro del comentario escribiese que esta agregando o modificando algún o algunos elementos, por ejemplo: agregando casas, calles, parque, cancha y árboles. Un comentario descriptivo ayudaría a otros mapeadores saber que se esta haciendo en el área. En este enlace https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios hay una mini guía de ejemplos de comentarios. Feliz mapeo.
SafetyIng (2026-04-08 09:30:03+00:00): Hey, you used "residential=cottage" - could you join our conversation on community.osm.org?
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/residential-tag-for-settlements-with-weekend-holiday-homes/142867
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2025-07-03 11:47:24+00:00): Artilce 447: "Lorsqu’il n’y a pas d’intersections OU de passages pour piétons clairement identifiés et situés à proximité, un piéton qui traverse un chemin public doit céder le passage aux véhicules routiers et aux cyclistes qui y circulent."

Article 450: "Lorsqu’il y a une intersection OU un passage pour piétons à proximité, un piéton ne peut traverser un chemin public qu’à l’un de ces endroits."

Ici il y a une intersection. C'est dangereux à l'heure de pointe, mais tout à fait légal. Je ne le remettrai pas parce que l'intersection la plus proche est jsute à côté, mais c'est légal de traverser à toute intersection, peu importe la présence ou non de marquage au sol, sauf si il y a un panneau interdiction aux piétons.
Cavokld (2025-07-27 12:20:03+00:00): Bonjour, en modifiant l'itinéraire cyclable "La Cyclo Bohème" notamment sur le rond-point 31669848
[url]=https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31669848[/url], vous avez rendu invalide tous les 13 itinéraires de bus empruntant ce rond-point.
Ici, dans les itinéraires de type=route, pour les bus, le rond-point entier était inclus dans la relation d'itinéraire. En segmentant ce rond-point et surtout en n'incluant pas la partie su segment du chemin : 1411590976 dans les relations des 13 itinéraires de bus.

Je vais être obligé de remettre tous les segments dans un seul rond-point afin que les itinéraires de bus fonctionnent de nouveau.  Et je ne pense pas que cela perturbe l'itinéraire cyclable.

J'imagine bien que vous faites attention à chacune de vos modifications, surtout que les relations itinéraires ne sont pas toujours les plus simples à vérifier.

Mon message n'a que pour but de renforcer la vigilance sur les modifications. Et personne n'est à l'abri de commettre quelques erreurs.

Cordialement
Lambig (2025-07-27 12:28:10+00:00): Bonjour,
En fait cela va poser problème car dans les itinéraires cyclables avec une différence entre l'aller et le retour (avec les rôles forward et backward), une erreur est systématiquement remontée si un rond-point entier a l'un des deux rôles. Je peux très bien ne pas toucher à la correction que vous allez apporter mais je ne garantie pas que quelqu'un d'autre refasse exactement la même chose que moi
Lambig (2025-07-27 13:08:35+00:00): J'ai réparé les itinéraires de bus en découpant le rond-point. J'ai également fait la même chose pour les itinéraires pédestres (dont le parcours prenait de façon absurde la route la plus longue sur le rond-point).

J'ai par contre laissé en l'état les lignes de car TER, qui sont beaucoup trop cassées de partout pour que j'y vois clair. :/

Vous pouvez me dire si c'est ok pour vous ? Encore désolé pour le problème de lignes de bus cassées.
Cavokld (2025-07-27 17:39:10+00:00): Parfait, à priori, pas de problème pour les itinéraires des bus
Langlaeufer (2025-07-02 16:40:31+00:00): Dann wäre die Nutzung ganz untersagt. Weil der Böschungsbereich ist Betriebsgelände des WSV (Nutzung verboten. Nutzung der Wege für Fußgänger und Radfahrer erlaubt)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168407045
NorthCrab_upload (2025-07-02 16:01:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264956944

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Kris74M (2025-07-25 16:27:53+00:00): poprawione
Friends of Hanlan's (2025-07-09 21:55:33+00:00): Hi, your changes to Hanlan's related trails (Beach Road, Trail 5, etc) are incorrect. Please use updated g-earth imagery to see where the new roads are located. The old road alignment was removed and planted, looks like sand in the interim but is not a sand trail. Please don't change again, thanks!
Dave Laird (2025-07-09 22:09:41+00:00): Sorry about that! Noted. I was using the Toronto Latest Orthoimagery and the Strava heatmap, but both myst be out of date.Nothing beats an IRL survey! Cheers.
ivanbranco (2025-07-25 09:41:11+00:00): Ciao Il Nega,

il tag name=* va utilizzato solo per nomi propri, non descrizioni come "strada sterrata con piccolo" o "strada di campagna", "edificio", "stalle", "guado" ecc.

Queste cose vanno espresse con gli appositi tag, ad esempio building=yes invece di name=edificio ecc.

grazie e buon mapping
aequator (2025-10-02 09:00:38+00:00): Hallo redd, das Logo ist zwar ein stilisierter Schriftzug »ForumIIICafé«, mit Referenz an das »Forum 3«. Aber, auf der Website, der Speisekarte usw. steht ausschließlich »Forum Café«. Insofern schlage ich vor, die Änderung des Namens wieder rückgängig zu machen und entsprechend auch den alt_name zu löschen. Gruß Carsten
redd (2025-10-02 15:08:41+00:00): Hi Carsten,
die Schreibweise ist leider nicht einheitlich. Auf der online abrufbaren Speisekarte ist auf ersten zwei Seiten das Café 4x als "Forum3 Café" und einmal als "Forum 3 Café". Auch auf der letzten Seite findet sich noch einmal die Schreibweise "Forum3 Café". Siehe Speisekarte https://www.forum3.de/speisekarte-2/

Die Abbuchungen der Kartenzahlung haben den Text "Forum 3 Cafe".

Die Schreibweise "Forum Café" finde ich dagegen nur im Navigationsmenü der Webseite.

Für mich war daher die logische Schlussfolgerung, dass das Café die Zahl 3 im Namen führen möchte und lediglich beim Logo stattdessen die stilistisch römische zahlenschreibweise "III" verwendet.

Ich verstehe sehr wohl, dass das Café von vielen Personen auch nur kurz "Forum Café" genannt wird. Daher habe ich dies nun als short_name zusätzlich ergänzt.

Grüße,

Redd
aequator (2025-10-03 10:13:42+00:00): Hallo redd , 

Du hast vollkommen recht. Bei der Aktualisierung der Stammtischtreffen im Wiki, hatte mich die Café-Unterseite[1] der Forum3-Website auf die falsche Spur gebracht. Dort ist die Schreibweise konsequent »ohne 3«. 

Pardon. 

Viele Grüße
Carsten

[1] https://www.forum3.de/cafe/