piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
trial (2026-03-15 16:15:29+00:00): Salut, je pense que building=appartments serait plus correct pour la résidence Aura. Et je vois qu'elle n'est pas rendue sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/47.790467/-3.489299&layers=V. On ne tague pas pour le rendu, mais ne pas voir un groupe d'immeubles c'est ballot.
trial (2026-03-16 10:19:08+00:00): En fait j'ai dit une c... : sur OMT MapTiler, il faut un certain temps avant la mise à jour, et c'est le landuse=construction qui n'est pas rendu. Et c'est building=apartments (avec un seul p) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:building%3Dapartments
cpa8 (2026-03-16 19:53:21+00:00): Salut, c'est pas déconnant, la doc du tag building=residential indique qu'il faut privilégier des attributs plus précis si possible.
La doc du tag building=apartments indique que des commerces peuvent être présents au rdc, donc ça convient plutôt bien je trouve.
trial (2026-05-19 19:26:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12145758871 : non, l'imagerie n'est pas à jour, il n'y a plus de marquage au sol (c'est une priorité à droite) depuis que la résidence Aura est ouverte.
trial (2026-05-19 19:37:26+00:00): Tu peux le voir sur une source non libre mais ma source c'est survey_date=2026-05-17, la preuve c'est que le bout de trottoir devant la laverie rue de Saint-Maurice vient d'être bitumé.
trial (2026-05-19 19:41:09+00:00): Images satellite Esri est une imagerie récente sur le coin.
dpolovinkin (2026-06-17 11:37:04+00:00): hi. man and here you ignored a lot of warnings as well, why...?
Kri_ttt (2026-06-18 14:29:03+00:00): I was just adding 'name:etymology:wikidata' tag to roadways (for the https://bangkok.equalstreetnames.org/). All of the wanings were already existed, But I didn't have time to fix it all at that time.
eggie (2026-03-15 12:12:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:00:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:07:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
Bienson (2026-03-15 20:16:32+00:00): Der Name des Gebäudes ist "GDW - Gesellschaft für Dach- u. Wandtechnik mbH"?
Sammyhawkrad (2026-03-15 14:31:22+00:00): Hi Samuel Asante, use building=yes to map buildings. area=yes doesn't mean anything.
notmyproblem1 (2026-03-15 12:10:44+00:00): I confirm that, this edit 179895134, was made by me with phone report
notmyproblem1 (2026-03-15 12:11:33+00:00): scusatemi per il changeset che prende tutta la liguria / sorry for the big changeset
ivanbranco (2026-03-15 12:23:26+00:00): imho non c'è bisogno di confermare che questo account secondario corrisponde a te in ogni changeset, vedo che c'è già il link nella bio.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
dankarran (2026-03-15 13:14:16+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

If you're moving a business from one place to another, if it's a single node you can just drag it to its new location and update the tags. But if it's also a building it's probably simplest to create a new node in the new location and just remove the tags from the original building. Make sure to leave the original building and any tags like address details.

Let me know if you need a hand - happy to help.
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:01:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183960337, 183960380, 183960341, 183960408, 183960275, 183960389, 183960221, 183960319, 183960306, 183960280, 183960292, 183960414, 183960349, 183960228, 183960252, 183960358, 183960240, 183960299, 183960267, 183960399, 183960370, 183960328, 183960364 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
woodpeck_repair (2026-06-11 09:11:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183960779 where the changeset comment is: revert low-quality AI building imports
ItaliA1delSole (2026-03-15 12:18:02+00:00): Fix inizio competenza Anas (scusatemi per l'errore "pix")
NeisBot (2026-03-15 12:27:43+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13649271099 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Residence building"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-23 17:33:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180317034
(Restore previous tags. No changes)
Supaplex (2026-03-16 06:09:35+00:00): 如果該地沒有地址的話，可以不用加地址相關的標籤
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179895883
eggie (2026-03-19 11:19:14+00:00): Beste volgspot,

Wat is je bron voor het plaatsen van deze hoogzitten.
Er zijn wat twijfels over de hoogzitten rondom Haaksbergen.
Zie https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nieuwe-mapper-verwijdert-data-uit-osm/99681/62

MVG
eggie
volgspot (2026-03-22 17:41:01+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

 de bron ben ik zelf. In eerste instantie heb ik de objecten met het blote oog gezien. Om er zeker van te zijn dat het geen fata morgana was, heb ik de verrekijker erbij gepakt om meer details te kunnen zien. Ter bevestiging heb ik de objecten met een professionele bridgecamera vastgelegd.
Ter verduidelijking kan ik je mededelen dat ik niet van de toegestane paden ben afgeweken; een kwestie van goed kijken, bij voorkeur in de maanden dat er geen blad aan de bomen zit. Mocht de object-verwijderaar twijfels hebben over of ik de officiële paden heb gevolgd, dan stuur ik uiteraard graag de gelopen track toe. Indien gewenst kan ik ook de foto's van de objecten toezenden, als bewijs dat deze gewoon vanaf de openbare weg te 'bewonderen' zijn.

Mvg, Volgspot
eggie (2026-03-22 17:57:58+00:00): Beste Volgspot,

Bedankt voor je reactie.
We hadden wat discussie met de verwijderaar van je hoogzitten. Ik had de verwijderingen teruggedraaid.

Mvg,
eggie
Rainero (2026-03-15 12:48:33+00:00): Korrektur: hier wurde changeset/178613771 zurückgesetzt.
Rainero (2026-03-15 12:54:15+00:00): Aarg, Korrektur der Korrektur: hier wurde changeset/178630213 zurückgesetzt.
eggie (2026-03-15 14:06:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-15 14:08:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
B252697 (2026-03-15 13:02:26+00:00): Exceptions are footpaths which are designated as walkways within the construction area. All based from this official source from Singapore National Parks Board: https://www.nparks.gov.sg/docs/default-source/parks-docs/west-coast-park/west-coast-park-map.png
Comino (2026-03-15 22:35:18+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino
Carto_Graph (2026-03-15 15:16:21+00:00): Это не secondary. Почитайте справку:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=secondary?uselang=ru
NeisBot (2026-03-15 13:27:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 9 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/208602997 v8 | 6 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1176803606 v1 | 3 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/10933153298 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179898164
iandees (2026-03-15 13:44:01+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
iandees (2026-03-15 13:44:14+00:00): Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position.
Glorg3 (2026-03-15 13:47:00+00:00): Hi! Thank you. Which node die I moved?
iandees (2026-03-15 13:52:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1269874928 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1066767980

It's fairly easy to do this by mistake when panning the map in the iD editor. You have to make sure you're not accidentally clicking on points while panning.
Bienson (2026-03-16 00:05:28+00:00): Unsinniges Multipolygon. Können auch einfach als zwei normale Flächen eingetragen werden. In der Regel ist nur ein Multipolygon nötig, wenn die Fläche "Löcher" enthalt, oder aus verschiedenen, sich nicht berührenden Flächen besteht.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:multipolygon
FriedhöfeDortmund_68654 (2026-03-16 07:58:10+00:00): und wo liegt der Unterschied, bzw. was soll ich tun?
Bienson (2026-03-16 22:42:57+00:00): Einfach die Flächen normal eintragen, ohne Multipolygon
woodpeck (2026-03-20 20:28:23+00:00): Der AdamVista, a "proposed" highway cannot come from satellite imagery, you need to specify the source of the information.
AdamVista (2026-03-22 17:05:25+00:00): Ok, because it will be planned.
mueschel (2026-03-18 19:29:37+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tags you added? There's a spelling mistake "sufrace" instead of "surface".
VictorIE (2026-03-16 14:28:49+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1335264565/

There are some landuse and buildings objects here that are double-mapped.
eggie (2026-03-15 14:10:59+00:00): Lijkt me geheel correct nu.
Gr eggie
bobbert123 (2026-03-15 14:41:07+00:00): 👍🏻
silversurfer83 (2026-04-24 19:58:25+00:00): Moin
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1489155814/history
Was soll das denn? Ist das neu gebaut worden? Auf dem Luftbild ist nichts zu sehen.

Achte bitte grundsätzlich darauf, dass du nur Dinge einträgst, die auch wirklich noch vorhanden sind.

Falls du möchtest, dass historische Objekte auf einer Karte auftauchen, nutze dafür bitte die OpenHistoricalMap

Grüße
silversurfer83 (2026-05-03 11:55:45+00:00): Hi,

was ist denn mit den Bahnsteigen hier? Ohne Antwort werde ich da nach Luftbild selbst korrigieren.
JakobD029 (2026-05-03 12:31:27+00:00): Hallo, 
tut mir leid wegen der späten Antwort. 
Jeder Bahnsteig ist tatsächlich noch vorhanden - Alle Bahnsteigkanten zumindest. Man hat ja nur das Gleis entfernt. Die gesamte Trasse besitzt trotz des fehlenden Gleises eine Widmund als Verkehrsinfrastruktur.
silversurfer83 (2026-05-03 12:39:10+00:00): Aha. Dann schlage ich vor, dass du höchstens die Kanten, die noch da sind, erfasst als barrier=retaining_wall

Ich kann auf dem Luftbild beim Besten Willen nicht erkennen, dass dort noch Bahnsteige sind und dann sollte das tagging das auch entsprechend wiederspiegeln. Denn aktuell ist es so gemappt, dass es so aussieht, als wäre hier noch ein vollständiger Bahnsteig und man könnte auf nen Zug warten. 

Historische Dinge gehören in die OHM.

Sei bitte so gut und pass das (also alle ex-Bahnsteige in Büren) mal an die Realität an, bevor jemand anders das macht. Danke

Falls Fragen sind, hau raus
JakobD029 (2026-05-03 15:59:42+00:00): Ich bin in den letzten Woche die Strecke von Paderborn aus bis Büren abgegangen. Von den meisten Dingen habe ich Fotos. 

Meine Frage bezieht sich auf die Bahnsteige in Borchen und Niederntudorf. Diese wurden um die Jahrtausendwende komplett ausgetauscht. Hier stehen moderne Bahnsteige wie man sie an einem modernen Bahnhof finden würde. Hier sind Fotos davon: 
https://imgur.com/a/eKRyR3o
Wie sind diese zu kartieren?
silversurfer83 (2026-05-04 17:58:13+00:00): Hi

da diese Bahnsteige langsam verfallen würde ich sie aktuell mit dem Lebenszykluspräfix abandoned:*=* erfassen.

Details zu diesen Werten unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

cheers
NeisBot (2026-03-15 14:12:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13649900715 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Concrete company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-03-23 17:33:09+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180317039
(Clean up leftovers from previous edits)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-17 01:42:33+00:00): Reverted adding SEO spam POI with advertising/malformed tags and explicit source=* of Google Maps, which is not allowed by both OSM and Google policies (see https://osm.wiki/Google ), in changeset 184205124

https://osm.org/changeset/184205124
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-03-15 14:13:58+00:00): Trình chỉnh sửa của tôi bị lỗi nên tự động upload lên máy chủ OSM mà không yêu cầu ghi chú, mô tả nhưng lại tự động sử dụng mô tả cũ changeset trước, đính chính lại đây là chỉnh sửa của tôi về cầu Lương Nha, tỉnh Phú Thọ nhé
bartgron (2026-03-15 18:34:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
bartgron (2026-03-15 18:34:41+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Nod5t5 (2026-03-15 14:52:00+00:00): Bevor es zu Anfragen kommt, dass es keine Beschreibung für den Grund der Löschung gibt, möchte ich auf diesen Link verweisen: https://www.wgh-herrenhausen.de/wohnen/bauprojekte/godshorner-gruen
AndyB_66 (2026-03-15 15:06:36+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
mueschel (2026-03-22 13:19:52+00:00): Hi,
there are several tags here that are not used in any other place. Could you check for common ones?

roof:covering
construction:year:main
construction:year:pavilion
construction:year:wall
building:style

E.g. style should be architecture, and the construction dates for different parts should be separated on different building:part objects.
bartgron (2026-03-15 18:36:20+00:00): Zestaw zmian jest nieprawidłowy i został wycofany.
Pozdrawiam
bartgron (2026-03-15 18:34:54+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
eggie (2026-03-15 15:50:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-03-16 13:00:21+00:00): Hi! Just checking why landuse=institutional was removed? It is documented and can be used until there is a better tag. Thanks and have a nice day!
ptaff (2026-03-16 14:34:41+00:00): Hello.

The Osmose QA tool complains that `landuse=*` and `amenity=*` should not be used together except in very specific cases.  I have no strong feeling either way, so I will put back `landuse=institutional`.  Osmose rule set for exceptions is at https://github.com/osmose-qa/osmose-backend/blob/master/plugins/TagRemove_Incompatibles.py#L30 should you want to prevent other people from making the same “mistake” I did.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-03-16 14:43:54+00:00): Oh I see, thanks for the info!
bartgron (2026-03-15 18:35:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
aTarom (2026-03-15 19:16:07+00:00): Hola, el tag "mobile" se usa exclusivamente para números de telefono móvil.
Lo retiro.
Saludos
DANDO MOTORAZOS (2026-03-16 19:32:06+00:00): Solamente era una prueba para ver como funcionaba en Osmand GPS.
Willem1 (2026-03-19 22:35:35+00:00): Hallo Martin, het viel me op dat er in deze changeset zo te zien nogal wat landuse verdwenen is in Guttecoven. Zou het voor jou mogelijk zijn om dit terug te zetten? Ik ben zelf helaas niet bekend met tools om verdwenen objecten terug te halen. Ik kan het natuurlijk wel “from scratch” intekenen als dat handiger is, laat maar weten. Alvast bedankt!
Met vriendelijke groeten, Willem
Martin Borsje (2026-03-21 17:05:53+00:00): We gaan eens kijken; weet niet wat er gebeurd is.
eggie (2026-03-15 15:56:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback   Ik heb access=no (Verboden Toegang)  verwijderd.
Je mag er vast wel komen.
De brug heb ik iets verplaatst en losgemaakt van de waterway = stream

MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2026-03-15 15:57:10+00:00): Misschien bicycle=no?
Hnsptrs (2026-03-15 16:09:41+00:00): Bedankt voor de snelle reactie. Het paleispark 't Loo is niet toegankelijk voor fietsers (en honden), erg prettig.. :)
Meende dat ook ingevuld te hebben, beginnersfoutje.
eggie (2026-03-15 16:12:44+00:00): Oke.. Je kunt het zelf toevoegen.
.. bicycle=no en dog=no
Mapse
Hufkratzer (2026-03-20 20:42:00+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1233990834 war als Gebäude (building=yes) getaggt und es sieht auf den Luftbildern auch aus wie ein Gebäude. Jedes Gebäude sollte ein building=* Tag haben, sonst wird es auf den Karten nicht als Gebäude dargestellt. Aber du hast das building=yes durch leisure=horse_riding ersetzt. Wenn es eine Reithalle ist, dann verwende besser building=riding_hall , wenn es ein Pferdestall ist, verwende building=stable usw. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a/R#Reitstall
skil (2026-03-22 04:15:26+00:00): Danke für den Hinweiß! Hab den Fehler mit  building=riding_hall korrigiert.
Hufkratzer (2026-03-23 21:27:25+00:00): Schön, das ist ein Fortschritt, dass da jetzt wieder ein building=* Tag dran ist.
Aber ist diese Reithalle eine Reitanlage im Sinn von leisure=horse_riding ? Oder gehört die Halle nur zu einer Reitanlage, zu der noch mehr gehört, wie z.B. bei
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/940881540/history#map=16/50.01907/9.77193&layers=P (Werntalhof)
旧加卷 (2026-03-16 02:03:36+00:00): 你提到的“实际管理的行政区划”若指的是“海洋空间的划区功能管理”（即“海域管理”），则你划分至中山市、广州市边界关系的范围已超过了两市国土空间总体规划所制定的规划范围，因此不成立；若你提到的“实际管理的行政区划”指的是管辖权归属海警局的海上执法权，则根据《中华人民共和国海警法》第十一条海警机构管辖范围“可以不受行政区划”限制之规定，海警机构管辖范围不得作为行政区划界的依据。即使是在你所引用的来源有效且行政区范围与海上执法范围相捆绑的情况下，你所谓的“实际管理界线”依旧不成立。界线是你试图根据实际情况推导的大致范围，而鉴于“实际管理界线”会随着执法船移动而变更的特性，“实际管理界线”不可能精确到300米以内。
你所引用的所有内容均不指向单一来源，而是被概括出来的描述，这种描述可以指向多个来源。
“珠海市行政区划公示”是指珠海市下辖行政区单位的名称列表？或是指行政区划调整批复？若为其中之一，这两者皆与深圳-珠海边界无关。若否，请说明其他更为具体且符合“珠海市行政区划公示”这一描述的来源。
“香港特别行政区政府文件”这一描述的覆盖范围比“珠海市行政区划公示”更广。这更像是在说，任何特区政府公布的文件均有可能成为你所引用的来源。香港特别行政区的范围已由《中华人民共和国国务院令第221号》确定，特区政府原则上无权针对这一范围以外的区域进行测绘和行政统计。
“中山市翠亨新区海域管理公示”不像是真实存在的并被公布的文件名称，如果是在描述某工程项目的海域使用论证或用海公示，请解释为何来源与行政区边界相关。
“航道地图”属于海图的一种，海图所标注的是水域要素和沿岸地物，不包括地级市边界。
“广东海事”不得作为行政区划的依据，除非你有更新的主张以推翻 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177124572#c1541100 中“关于 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177322812#c1541045
中提到的海事局管辖范围问题”的部分。海事局管辖范围、海警局管辖范围、行政区划范围三者各不相等。
综上所述，此变更集引用的来源无效，据此作出的编辑亦无法反应实际情况。
NeisBot (2026-03-15 15:45:40+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 37 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/316984289 v5 | 14 crossings
https://osm.org/way/221907698 v8 | 13 crossings
https://osm.org/way/221907719 v12 | 10 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/3231815648 v4

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=179904799
NeisReview (2026-03-23 17:33:18+00:00): ✅ Should be fixed by 
https://osm.org/changeset/180010142
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-17 06:43:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13650119808/history has pedestrian = yes that was added in this edit
Was it supposed to mark legal pedestrian access? In such case - foot=yes is the normal tag for it, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot
silversurfer83 (2026-03-16 20:40:10+00:00): Hi there :)

Good reasoning. It's either ask every user that added the tag or wait for someone with StreetComplete to walk by. 

(You could have split this CS by country, don't you think? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets )

happy mapping :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179904962
supsup (2026-03-16 21:03:10+00:00): yeah, I was actually not aware of the JOSM function "Upload selection" until now, will use it for similar things from now on.
wolfbert (2026-05-05 07:44:58+00:00): waterway=water_point: A place to fill fresh water holding tanks of a boat. 

Besser wäre hier amenity=drinking_water (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=drinking_water).
erwinnindl (2026-05-05 19:07:11+00:00): Danke für die Anregung, ich werde es aktualisieren.
kingkingHK (2026-03-16 03:36:48+00:00): unmarked or informal?
Kovoschiz (2026-03-16 16:26:22+00:00): Please don't blindly merge different sections without understanding. They are split for a reason ( viz `parking:both:restriction=no_stopping` ) .
Kovoschiz (2026-03-16 17:00:23+00:00): `crossing=informal` is poorly named. UK "Informal" means `=unmarked` / `=uncontrolled`
Kovoschiz (2026-03-16 17:04:15+00:00): 2. You broke a `=service` road. Just avoid connecting them.
Mannivu (2026-04-24 08:47:45+00:00): Ciao, perché hai eliminato la denominazione "Antonio Locatelli" dalla scuola primaria? Anche dal sito dell'Istituto comprensivo la denominazione è quella (https://www.iccolognoalserio.edu.it/pagine/scuola-primaria)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179905326
Andrea Alessioli (2026-04-24 09:52:11+00:00): Recentemente hanno rifatto la facciata dell'edificio e hanno lasciato solo "scuola elementare", mi sembrava motivo sufficiente per cambiare perché mi sono accorto dopo che sul sito era ancora intitolata a quel tizio.
Mannivu (2026-04-24 10:25:11+00:00): Se sulla facciata è scritto solo Scuola elementare lo possiamo indicare con inscription sul poligono dell'edificio, ma la scuola è comunque intitolata a Locatelli
maxwellward (2026-03-19 04:12:40+00:00): Hello! Please note that private driveways should still be mapped on OSM, as we have a practice of "map whats on the ground", regardless of if it is private or public property.

Private driveways should instead be given the tag of access=private to indicate they are private property. This will prevent most routing software from sending people down these roads.

These driveways have already been added back by another contributor, and so I have gone ahead and added the private tag for you.

Please let us know if you have any questions!
Max
SZ475 (2026-03-15 16:15:24+00:00): Can I kindly ask why 200 people think removing duplicate buildings is wrong?