piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-26 04:38:56+00:00): Hi locakl,

Thank you for ensuring your tagging is at least mostly correct, unlike most similar SEO accounts.

There are still some issues that need to be corrected for what you've mapped already before you keep adding more. This includes the following specific tagging issues:

- Per OSM standards addr:street=* must be written out in full, as in the name=* of the street you can see right next to the business, not abbreviated. For example, "South Tryon Street", not "S Tryon St". This ensures the address matches the form OSM and data consumers expect, helping your customers find your franchise locations. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:street
- In general, unless "Local Concrete of Mooresville" is how this particular franchise location is both consistently advertised on signs, on the website, etc (which does not appear to be the case, as the city name is only a subtitle, and in fact that name never appears in that form anywhere on the page) as well referred to by customers, name=* should be just the brand name, "Local Concrete". The full name can go in official_name=*, and the branch descriptor (Mooresville) can go in branch=*, so `name=Local Concrete + official_name=Local Concrete of Mooresville + branch=Moorseville`. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only 
- craft=concrete is not a documented tag, nor is it substantially in use (with only 46 total uses worldwide). You can use it if you wish, but you should create a page documenting it as described here https://osm.wiki/Any_tags_you_like#Documenting_tags_not_in_Map_Features . This will help data consumers know how to interpret your POI, which in turn makes it more visible to potential customers looking for it.

Please go ahead and fix at least the first two issues on your existing changesets (as you've done for e.g. the non-location-specific URL, thank you). If you have any questions, I'd be happy to answer them. Thanks.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-26 04:39:13+00:00): Additionally, two wider issues need to be addressed:

- One of the most basic rules of OSM is "don't copy from other maps". That, of course, includes the proprietary Google Maps, which is prohibited by both Google and OSM's policies/ToS. Normally, this would mean that for legal reasons all of your changesets would need to be not only reverted, but the data fully redacted with any record of it ever existing disappearing from public view. However, I have not immediately gone ahead and done so under the presumption that, as the SEO contractor (or employee) of the franchisor, you have or easily could have independently verification of those addresses through, e.g., the company's own web site, which is allowed. However, it is imperative that you clarify that situation here and not cite Google as a source for any future changesets, or unfortunately serious action would have to be taken. See https://osm.wiki/Google
- In the interests of responsible disclosure and building trust and transparency with the community, you should disclose at least on your profile that you are a SEO mapper (or an employee of the business, if that is actually the case) and at least briefly describe the scope of your mapping activities. See the good practices listed under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam

I'm happy to answer any questions about this as well. Thanks!
FajrAl (2026-06-26 09:22:34+00:00): Harap memberikan judul perubahan. Jika belum menguasai JOSM, saya sarankan gunakan iD editor.
GrabID_FaizahM (2026-06-26 14:42:17+00:00): terima kasih atas feedbacknya, kesalahan saya lupa memberi judul perubahan. way ID tersebut didelete karena terbaca living street sedangkan tidak ada jalan pada aktualnya. editor sebelumnya menghapus tag boundary https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/388076613
yelisey90 (2026-06-27 15:31:42+00:00): You've created two roads that lead inside the territory of a factory without setting any access tags, and these roads cross fences without any gates or something. That's incorrect, please fix that. If you do not know for sure what are the potential barriers to enter the territory, do not create such roads.
Adinurbekov (2026-07-02 08:56:06+00:00): Thank you, we will fix this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184623197
Frans S (2026-06-26 07:45:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please map more accurate, square the buildings and don't connect the buildings to each other with the nodes.
I assume you marked this task as unavailable accidentally.
Just mark it as more mappings needed when you want to stop when there are still buildings to be mapped.
Best regards and keep mapping
cxc (2026-06-26 08:15:51+00:00): sorry for inconvenience.... ;-) bye
Baloo Uriza (2026-07-02 12:43:22+00:00): Are there actually two lanes?  Looking at the Bing aerial, it looks like there's no lane markings, so no lanes=* tag should be present (but lane_markings=no should instead)
Glassman (2026-06-27 02:15:26+00:00): Why were the addresses removed? I agree that duplicating the address accross a bunch of nodes probably isn't correct, but the address is valid for that location according to Chelan County GIS. See https://maps.co.chelan.wa.us/GIS/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184624584
n76 (2026-06-27 04:28:51+00:00): I left node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12179505324 to keep the address information but removed the duplicates. I also moved the node to be closer to the main (dining) building where a visitor who somehow got there by means other than the shuttle bus or the ranch's bus would most likely check in.

Unless Chelan County does things quite differently than I have seen elsewhere, the address is likely to be on the parcel but I figure for OSM is it best to place it near where someone navigating to that address would like to end up. To that end duplicates confuse the situation.

For Stehekin Valley Ranch, I doubt anyone actually uses the street address. The only vehicles in the area are owned by locals who definitely know where that is located.
Glassman (2026-06-27 15:57:15+00:00): Thanks for the info. I missed that node. FYI - I'm kinda of obsessed with addresses. I've been importing addresses for a long time. And while locals may not have a problem, if someone just wants to search on the address, then it's great having it in OSM.
n76 (2026-06-27 16:13:12+00:00): I think addresses are important too. When I started mapping for OSM at my old city, GIS data was not available and I walked about 3/4 of the streets gathering address data. Same think for the city I move to 10 years ago. During COVID I found the county GIS data and imported addresses for much of the county I live in.

Which is a major reason I left the one address node for Stehikin Valley Ranch that made the most sense based on what I saw on the ground.
tastrax (2026-06-26 07:08:01+00:00): Did you mean the walking track or this short length of road?
Rowan_AU (2026-06-26 07:13:33+00:00): I did intend for it to be for the small section of road. I couldn't see past the gate there so couldn't verify if the road is the same further up.
yelisey90 (2026-06-27 16:46:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229528287 — this is not a parking_aisle. It's a road leading to a parking space, that is a regular service road. Please fix that
aibek55 (2026-06-29 08:29:48+00:00): I fixed it.
mueschel (2026-07-08 19:24:02+00:00): Hi,
what does "access:requires_pii" mean? This tag isn't used in any other place.
yelisey90 (2026-06-27 16:48:58+00:00): Once again, these are not parking_aisles
aibek55 (2026-06-29 08:31:14+00:00): I fixed it.
yelisey90 (2026-06-27 16:54:43+00:00): partially reverted - it's a cow path at most, not a road

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184703282
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 07:55:34+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
impiaaa (2026-06-26 17:18:33+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing! When a business has closed, it's better to just remove the information that's no longer relevant, rather than deleting the location entirely. The address still exists at that location, for example. An easy way to do this in the iD web editor is to use the "downgrade" option (backspace) instead of "delete."
kuonji (2026-06-26 21:54:22+00:00): Thank you for the information. About restoring the point that was deleted, how can I restore the data?
impiaaa (2026-07-06 21:45:09+00:00): Ah, sorry for not getting back to you sooner. I see you figured it out already, thanks for fixing it!
JJIglesias (2026-06-26 07:55:04+00:00): Por favor recordar Escuadrar las edificaciones apretando la letra Q o en el Mouse click derecho.

Las imágenes pueden distorsionar las edificaciones pero el 99% de ellas tienen ángulos a 90 grados y son simétricas y ortogonales. Las imágenes satélites son angulares NO verticales.

Por favor activa la opción ISSUES en el panel derecho de tu editor, para q te aparezcan tus errores, si los hubiera

Gracias
marcoah17 (2026-07-08 13:20:09+00:00): Hola, este mensaje lo recibo constantemente y al revisar estoy cumpliendo con lo que indicas.

Que sucede con este mensaje tan repetitivo?
Piskvor (2026-06-26 08:37:50+00:00): Maybe even building=stadium?
aloxe (2026-06-27 19:27:24+00:00): yes this was verified on spot (several weeks before) but not uploaded at the time. 
I just verified all things changed and this is correct. I admit this makes a very strange changeset.
Mannivu (2026-06-27 12:14:05+00:00): Ciao, qui hai rimosso un nodo (https://osm.org/node/5865536286) che rappresentava un cafè chiuso (ora c'è un altro locale, in realtà), ma così facendo hai rimosso anche la cronologia del nodo. L'ho ripristinato e aggiornato alla situazione attuale.

Inoltre, sarebbe meglio evitare commenti troppo generici come "Improvements in Lombardy", meglio indicare esattamente cosa si è modificato.

Il tag source all'interno degli elementi andrebbe evitato, meglio indicare la fonte delle modifiche nel changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184629719
wegavision (2026-06-27 17:31:30+00:00): In realtà non elimino mai i POI; è possibile che in questo caso l’indirizzo fosse errato e che io non mi sia accorto che dietro c’era qualcos’altro. A Treviglio erano stati inseriti solo pochissimi indirizzi, che ho lasciato tutti così com’erano, ma alcuni erano chiaramente sbagliati. 
Non riesco a descrivere nel dettaglio tutto quello che faccio: controllare le strade, inserire i cartelli, inserire le aree; inserire i POI; inserire i numeri civici; definire gli incroci, ecc. 
È semplicemente troppo, ecco perché mi limito a questa descrizione generica.

Tradotto con DeepL.com (versione gratuita)
wegavision (2026-06-27 17:33:20+00:00): Quando avrò finito le mie verifiche, pubblicherò le mie immagini, così potrete controllare se ho commesso qualche errore.
Mannivu (2026-06-27 17:46:55+00:00): Scrivere un commento chiaro, però, è una delle basi del progetto (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments). Se le modifiche sono troppe da descrivere, forse è meglio spezzettare i gruppi di modifiche per tipologia di modifica.
wegavision (2026-06-28 05:24:28+00:00): Non la vedo così: il commento serve solo a indicare approssimativamente quale sia lo scopo delle modifiche. Basta dare un’occhiata a quante modifiche ho apportato nelle ultime due settimane: dovrei davvero scrivere ogni volta cosa ho fatto esattamente? Sono su OSM da abbastanza tempo da sapere esattamente cosa sto facendo. Naturalmente, chi apporta molte modifiche a volte commette anche qualche errore; se ne trova uno, la prego di correggerlo.
Mannivu (2026-06-28 07:03:44+00:00): Lo so che sei un mappatore da tanto, ma non sono pretese mie, è una delle cose che rendono più facile capire cosa volevi fare. Non è una richiesta mia, è una cosa comunitaria, tanto che nella linea guida è ben indicato come andrebbe scritto.

«A good changeset comment should concisely and adequately describe an edit. At the minimum, this includes a verb (how you changed things) and an object (what you changed)»
Kovoschiz (2026-06-26 17:20:31+00:00): 1. It's inconsistent to change only one section in between 
2. This is not Expressway
FajrAl (2026-06-26 09:39:19+00:00): Kenapa suntingannya hingga ke Amerika Serikat? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1495386559
GrabID_NisaAmelia (2026-07-03 02:14:58+00:00): maaf kak, sebelumnya. saya tidak menyunting garis tersebut, yang saya sunting garis yang lain di Indonesia, kemungkinan sempat tersentuh karena area yang muncul sebelum saya ke koordinat yang akan saya edit adalah area di amerika tersebut, jadi ikut terkena komen.
GrabID_NisaAmelia (2026-07-03 02:29:19+00:00): untuk kesalahannya sudah saya perbaiki kak, terima kasih sudah mengingatkan
nyampire (2026-07-01 12:26:03+00:00): こんにちは、OSM Foundation Japanのいいだ（nyampire）と申します。

OSMありがとうございます、OSMへようこそ、、、

と言いたいところですが、あなたの行っている編集はいったんすべてリバート（巻き戻し）させていただきます。
理由は以下のとおりです。

* 編集に利用しているデータが、基盤地図情報の可能性が極めて高い。基盤地図情報のデータインポートは、ライセンスの競合により、許可されていません。
* 事前に相談されていないインポートである。OSMはインポートなどの大規模編集を行う際、Import Guidelineに従った手続きを事前に行う必要があります。
* 事前に相談されていない組織的編集である。金沢周辺を対象に、いくつかのアカウントがほぼ同じ活動をしています。組織として作業を行う場合、組織的編集のガイドラインに従う必要があります。

その他、投入されたデータは、既に描かれた建物と重複して登録されているなど、データ品質の面からも看過できない状況となっています。

また、別のアカウントからコメントをいただき、大学の研究でデータを利用したい、ということを伺いました。
それであれば、代替となるデータセットの紹介や、別アプローチでのアクションなども相談させていただきます。
nyampire@gmail.com までメールをいただけるよう、お手数ではありますが、指導教官あるいはリーダーに状況のエスカレーションを行ってください。
必要に応じてWeb会議などもセット可能です。
marcmarti (2026-06-26 07:32:55+00:00): Hello,
Please remember to limit the area of your changesets locally.
Sharko_MV3 (2026-06-26 07:48:35+00:00): ??????
GeoSylvaris (2026-06-26 08:48:09+00:00): A massive changeset! It basically covers half the earth.
jcnl44 (2026-06-26 10:48:44+00:00): Bonjour,
Le POI que vous avez ajouté est obsolète. Le Comptoir des Vignes a déménagé depuis plus d'un an au 3 rue des Capucins. 

Merci de faire attention à la véracité des données que vous insérez !!
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-06-26 12:03:04+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre alerte, notre client nous a envoyé l'ancienne adresse ce matin. Nous lui avons remonté cette erreur. Bonne journée
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2026-06-26 12:31:34+00:00): Nous avons effectué cette modification en toute bonne foi, car son site web possède encore l'ancienne adresse (champ de foire) et  nous ne disposons pas à ce jour du numéro SIRET de cet établissement, qui nous aurait permis de consulter les données INSEE et d'identifier la nouvelle adresse enregistrée. Nous  transmettons à notre client afin qu'il actualise ses données sources, ce qui permettra une synchronisation conforme à la réalité. Encore merci pour votre vigilance.
Cordialement
Randomfra (2026-07-04 23:53:42+00:00): Bonjour, sur ce changement, vous avez déplacé un nœud composant le quai A de la gare à environ 400 mètres au sud et déformé la carte et le quai en ce faisant, car il apparaissait débordant jusque dans le petit bois au sud. J'ai corrigé.
arjunaraoc (2026-06-26 11:43:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  Andhra Pradesh page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh) and  join OSM Andhra Pradesh Telegram channel (https://t.me/osmandhra). This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. On OSM personally identifiable information like persons names are not used in tags, as it is a safety risk. For more info please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_private_information . I suggest you remove name tag for your edit and update. If you have a question or need help, please respond.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184631256
arjunaraoc (2026-06-28 04:33:53+00:00): Thanks for fixing the tags. I updated the issue as resolved.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184631256
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-02 07:32:49+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other mistagging for POI

https://osm.org/changeset/184958943
Maltimore (2026-06-26 07:32:06+00:00): There's a new pizza place called dough bros there now
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-26 07:39:28+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Are the added names real?
YomanNH (2026-06-26 07:40:32+00:00): Dzisiaj jest 26 czerwca.
haJKha (2026-06-30 09:55:31+00:00): ;)
haJKha (2026-06-30 09:55:56+00:00): Odblokuj jezdnie obok. :)
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-06-26 12:10:04+00:00): This is a transition from 1 lane to 2. lanes, so please keep the lanes count to 2 because there is a placement=transition with width:lanes:start tags. Thanks!
rsitoni_Lyft (2026-06-30 07:55:09+00:00): Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligraphy,
Thank you for bringing this to my attention and for correcting the mistake. I'm Ravinder, a mapper with the OSM team at Lyft. The issue was caused by my oversight - I didn't notice the placement=transition tag & updated the lane information instead.  I apologize for this oversight and any inconvenience it may have caused. 
Thank you for your continued contributions to OSM.
Happy Mapping!
Ravinder
bob3bob3 (2026-07-22 22:40:27+00:00): Have put it back to where it really is. Suggest use the Mapillary imagery
bxl-forever (2026-06-26 09:31:20+00:00): Hello,

I am surprised to see such an edit coming from an experienced user.

MapRoulette quests are sometimes misleading. I had spotted the problem a couple of days ago and had planned to investigate this; it looks like either the same school is mapped twice under a slightly different name or those are two different schools.

But simply relocating the amenity=school node into another amenity=school area, just to please the MapRoulette game by having a POI inside a building looks horribly wrong.

What do you think?
CasGroenigen (2026-06-26 09:41:05+00:00): Hi, if you ask me it looks like it's a duplicate of the same school.
https://fondprim.isaxl.be/

My apologies for the thoughtless mapping, I should've taken better care of what I was doing :)
Marvk (2026-06-26 14:57:33+00:00): Hi s1973w und willkommen bei OSM,

gerne möchte ich dich ermutigen, bei zukünftigen Änderungen einen etwas beschreibenderen Changeset-Kommentar zu schreiben. Es muss kein Roman sein, so etwas wie "Nicht mehr vorhandene Gebäude entfernt" reicht vollkommen. Dann wissen auch andere Mapper, ohne deine Änderungen im Detail zu sichten, was du geändert hast und ggf. warum.

Dazu auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Beste Grüße
Marv
s1973w (2026-06-29 06:20:00+00:00): Hallo Marv,

besten Dank für die Info. Werde deinen Hinweis für die nächsten Änderungen berücksichtigen.

Mit sonnigen Grüßen

Sven
zuicz (2026-06-26 08:47:19+00:00): zniknął przystanek Kosztowy Pętla stanowisko 2
adamos (2026-06-29 10:17:39+00:00): fixed
Kamil Kalata (2026-06-26 09:01:04+00:00): Witaj!
Cieszę się, że postanowiłeś dołączyć do projektu OpenStreetMap. Zastanawia mnie jednak jedno: czy oby na pewno te trzy drogi, które zmieniłeś tutaj i wcześniej, są rzeczywiście drogami polnymi czy tylko drogami gruntowymi, prowadzącymi do gospodarstw? Zgodnie z wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dtrack#:~:text=Mapowanie%20innych%20dróg%20gruntowych) takie drogi powinny mieć kategorię inną niż "track". O ile ten łącznik Wiejskiej z Ogrodową może być rzeczywiście "track", chociaż i tu mam wątpliwości właśnie ze względu na funkcję łącznikową, o tyle dwie drogi prowadzące do Gaju oraz do budynku przy Gajowej 1 nie powinny być "track" właśnie ze względu na funkcję dojazdu do gospodarstw.
DCools (2026-06-30 18:40:11+00:00): We are adding the part between brackets specifically to make it clearer (externally) for our travelers. The only and correct name is the one with the brackets. https://www.delijn.be/nl/haltes/?q=Zonneveld&results=4
multimob (2026-07-01 08:53:37+00:00): Yes, we are aware of that.

The full name has not been deleted, it it stored as "name:operator:De_Lijn".

As the documentation says: "Apps that rely on OSM data can choose to display either the operator’s version of the name or the normal name from OSM."
DCools (2026-07-01 14:39:41+00:00): OK no problem, I didn't know that. But just one extra thing: if De Lijn as (only!) operator (and in consultation with the local authorities) changes a name internally AND externally of a stop, the old name without bracket disappears in the systems and on the field. So "the normal name from OSM" here is in fact outdated since 30/06/2026.
DCools (2026-06-30 18:39:19+00:00): We are adding the part between brackets specifically to make it clearer (externally) for our travelers. The only and correct name is the one with the brackets.  https://www.delijn.be/nl/haltes/?q=Middelkerke+Sea+Shopping&results=4
multimob (2026-07-01 08:53:53+00:00): This comment is a duplicate of the conversation here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184634342
cgreggescalante (2026-06-30 22:36:08+00:00): It's good to try out creating features in the editor, but please do not add anything that does not exist in the real world. I've already reverted this change, but please refrain from this in the future. Happy mapping!
YomanNH (2026-06-26 10:29:40+00:00): Hej, byłem tam wczoraj i z zewnątrz wyglądało, że budowa się zakończyła. Na pewno główna droga wjazdowa wyglądała na gotową. Coś tam jeszcze budują, czy można usunąć teren budowy?
michalgy (2026-07-14 12:06:06+00:00): Cześć, budowa chyba faktycznie zakończona, wybrałem się tam w ostatnią niedzielę 12.07 i chyba zamontowali też już ostatnie wiaty. Byli też chyba mieszkańcy/kupujący mieszkania, więc dodam całość w kolejnej edycji
YomanNH (2026-07-14 12:14:41+00:00): Super, dzięki :)
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-06-26 18:30:03+00:00): Blatant SEO spam
NieWnen (2026-06-27 22:22:22+00:00): Cześć,

wykryłem nieprawidłowe tagowanie w tej zmianie m.in dot. to linii takiej jak ta:  
Jeśli jest to CPR (ciąg pieszo-rowerowy), to tagowanie powinno zostać poprawione zgodnie z wiki: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1532665040

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w

Powinno to zostać zmienione na highway=path

Jako, że jest to edycja wykonywana przez edytor iD, to dodam tylko, że zawsze warto patrzeć w tagi.
mapperv1 (2026-07-02 05:32:33+00:00): the farmlands present at the upper area can be merged into one. This would be help in not leaving any area unmapped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184636269
tux67 (2026-06-26 11:21:25+00:00): Hi mueschel,
nur zur Info - den Namen hatte ich bewusst gewählt, weil es mir nur um bestimmte Wege ging, bei denen der falsche highway tag gewählt war. Das war kein typo - in solchen Fällen fänd ich es nett erstmal nach den Beweggründen gefragt zu werden.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184636300
mueschel (2026-06-26 11:37:55+00:00): Du hattest greprüft, ob das highway-Tag korrekt ist, es also wirklich verkehrsberuhigte Bereiche sind?  Dann ist "check_date:highway" doch genau richtig.  Oder meintest du etwas anders?

Es heißt ja auch "check_date:opening_hours" und nicht "check_date:opening_hours_timeranges"
tux67 (2026-06-26 11:44:23+00:00): nein, meine Intention war eigentlich die Straßen so geflaggt zu lassen, bis ich durch bin und dann das Flag wieder rauszunehmen (der meinetwegen auch auf den Standard zu ändern). Ein Standardflag wäre mir da im Weg gewesen. Ich hab's aber auch nicht speziell mit einer Note als "Baustelle" erkennbar gemacht .. von daher wahrscheinlich halb selbst Schuld ..