piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Bierphysik (2025-10-12 09:31:50+00:00): Moin. Du hast auf die node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13112500607#map=19/49.672057/8.924978 ein noexit=yes gesetzt; der Tag kommt aber eigentlich auf die letzte node des Weges. Und nicht an die STelle an der ein etwaiges Sackgassenschild steht; noexit=yes hat damit nämlich erstmal nicht unbedingt etwas zu tun in Deutschland (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:noexit%3Dyes)
Bierphysik (2025-10-12 09:33:24+00:00): bzw auch hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a/S#Sackgasse
Bierphysik (2025-10-13 19:19:41+00:00): ich fix es flott bevor ichs vergesse
Interteutones (2025-10-14 16:44:58+00:00): Hallo,
laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a/S#Sackgasse
kann "Das Verkehrsschild (kann) am Aufstellungspunkt gekennzeichnet werden". So ist es auch in der Praxis.
Bierphysik (2025-10-14 17:13:51+00:00): Das stimmt, aber der tag noexit=yes kommt nicht an die Stelle des Schildes, sondern an die letzte node des Weges sofern der Weg die in den Links genannten Bedingungen erfüllt. :)
AndyB_66 (2025-09-02 07:52:40+00:00): "Osiedle Piastów" w dopełniaczu to "Osiedla Piastów", a nie "Osiedla Piastowa" - podobnie "Osiedle Uścienków". Zwróć uwagę, proszę, na swoje pozostałe zestawy zmian, których dokonałeś i popraw tego typu "kwiatki".
kubahahaha (2025-09-02 08:34:24+00:00): Przejrzałem i zaraz wyślę changeset z poprawkami, ale sam nie jestem pewien:
Kolonia Kumów Pierwszy
to powinno być w dopełniaczu
Kolonii Kumów Pierwszy czy Kolonii Kumowa Pierwszego?

Tak samo Kolonia Władysławów.

Bo nie chcę już mieszać i najwyżej mogę usunąć
AndyB_66 (2025-09-02 08:51:27+00:00): "Kolonii Kumów Pierwszy" i "Kolonii Władysławów"
kubahahaha (2025-09-02 10:31:44+00:00): Dzięki, poprawione
Dawid2849 (2025-09-02 11:17:35+00:00): Nie jestem pewny co do tego dopełniacza. Np. ta strona: http://nlp.actaforte.pl:8080/Nomina/Miejscowosci?nazwa=Kolonia+Stary+Ratyniec
dla Kolonii Stary Rataniec pokazuje dopełniacz "Kolonii Starego Ratyńca
". Strona bazuje na danych z Wykazu urzędowych nazw miejscowości i ich części (2019)
AndyB_66 (2025-09-02 11:33:56+00:00): Trzeba zapytać Profesorów Miodka albo Bralczyka - choć, jak to rabini - jeden powie tak, drugi tak :)
Glassman (2025-09-02 16:06:07+00:00): #TIP: The address should be separated into the street name, house number, city and zip code. I went ahead and fixed it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171330870
dmjab13 (2025-09-04 19:08:24+00:00): please try and keep edits to one region or state!
Jacksonville (2025-09-01 21:58:11+00:00): Makkah IS a city.
Jacksonville (2025-09-01 21:58:34+00:00): Makkah is known for Masjid al-Haram.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-09-03 07:03:47+00:00): DWG revert - not OSM material

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171391972
Filip009 (2025-09-04 15:48:10+00:00): Zdravím. Do budúcna - na jednotlivé chodníčky nie je potrebné pridávať názov mtb trasy. Reláciu stačí vytvoriť len jednu a potom do nej pridať jednotlivé segmenty.
adakoo (2025-09-04 16:04:36+00:00): Ahoj, díky za tip. V tomto prípade som ju rozdelil aby som mohol v jednej relácí nastaviť colour=black (horná časť) a v druhej color=red (dolná časť). Ak tomu správne chápem tak napr. Mapy.com berú farbu z relácie. Podobne som zduplikoval názov "pre istotu", lebo som si nebol istý odkiaľ rôzne renderery berú hodnotu (z elementov alebo z relácie).
Filip009 (2025-09-04 16:56:54+00:00): Tá farba by tam mala byť len pokiaľ má trasa určenú nejakú farbu. (Predpokladám, že tá, ktorú spomínaš ty určuje obtiažnosť trasy). Názov sa berie aj aj. Na každej mape inak. Ale keďže sa nejedná o názov chodníka ale názov trasy, tak to patrí na reláciu. (Názov na chodník sa dáva, keď sa napríklad jedná o ulicu)
Možno by bolo vhodné napísať mapy.com aby aj na svete pridávali farbu mtb trasy podľa jej náročnosti podľa mtb:scale.
dp7 (2025-09-02 11:19:03+00:00): Hello mayodrop, thanks for your update but please don't include such extended areas in a unique changeset. Divide your changes in separate changeset for smaller areas. Thanks !
findftp (2025-09-01 21:35:21+00:00): Hey, bedankt. Ik was helemaal vergeten dat ik hem geplaatst had en wilde het zelf op een later tijdstip doen.
eggie (2025-09-01 20:38:11+00:00): Dag Bobanthar, 

Je vraagt feedback. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:community_centre%3Dcultural_centre
Wanneer dit het is is het oke lijkt mij.

MCG
eggie
Udarian (2025-09-01 20:37:42+00:00): so does this mean that this business takes up the whole building.
Connected Shop (2025-09-01 20:55:38+00:00): No, it's on the 1st floor only as seen on Google Maps as well
Udarian (2025-09-01 21:24:40+00:00): then building=yes is incorrect.
eggie (2025-09-01 21:06:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback.... Alle begin is moeilijk. maar wat denk je dat access=no betekent? 
Dat is Verboden Toegang voor iedereen. 
... en er staat toch al in de tagging vehicle=no  Dat is alles met wielen.
Het was dus al correct getagd hier.. De voorgaande mapper was ikzelf. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-09-01 21:09:59+00:00): Overigens maken deze paden deel uit van de Achtkastelenroute. Hoe loopt die route dan als je er niet mag fietsen?

Graag reactie
eggie (2025-09-01 21:22:33+00:00): Ik heb de fietsroute omgelegd zodat die niet meer over de wandelpaden loopt. 
Wel access=no verwijderd. Maak svp geen combinaties van foot yes en access=no.
De rendering verdwijnt dan ook bijna van de paden. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-01 21:31:40+00:00): De achtkastelenroute na omlegging..
https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=16.0/52.0968/6.3873
dvdhoven (2025-09-02 06:31:46+00:00): Link naar routepagina:
https://achterhoek.nl/Acht-kastelenroute
eggie (2025-09-02 06:52:36+00:00): Hoi Dick... yep.. er moet even een staartje aan heen en terug.
Over die track waar die in osm liep mag je inderdaad niet fietsen. Ik heb die route wel eens gereden.
Wil jij dat doen?

Van startende mapper geen reactie ontvangen.

Groet..
eggie
eggie (2025-09-02 08:16:07+00:00): Ik heb een staartje aan de route gemaakt naar 't Medler tot de oprijlaan die op private staat, maar kan me herinneren dat er ook een dingetje was met die oprijlaan voor fietsers.
Volgens mij staat er vooraan ook een C12 bord en een bordje over vrij wandelen. 
Het klopt dus nog niet helemaal met het routekaartje. 
Wellicht wil Jan Brouwer nog reageren.
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2025-09-02 08:16:53+00:00): Route nu https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=16.0/52.0968/6.3873
dvdhoven (2025-09-02 12:19:17+00:00): Ik heb de route nog even langs gelopen, bij de Wildenborch speelde iets soortgelijks, route lag heel dicht bij het huis. En bij Hackfort moest ook nog een heen-en-weertje erbij.

Bij een heen-en-weertje, hoef je geen rollen te gebruiken. Die heb ik verwijderd. De analysetool in WMT werd er ook niet vrolijk van.
WMT analyseert tegenwoordig alle routes en als ze in orde zijn, krijgen ze een groen vinkje, bij een fout een rood kruisje en als de analyse het niet goed kan bepalen een soort kronkeltje. De Acht Kastelenroute had zo'n kronkeltje

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
eggie (2025-09-02 12:25:39+00:00): Ahh.. top!  Weer wat geleerd.

Groet
eggie
Comino (2025-09-01 21:51:49+00:00): 

Hi,

As mentioned in my email to you earlier today, only physical stores are allowed on OSM (OpenStreetMap), not online shops. Businesses that are not clearly identifiable as a store or office (for example, if they are located in a residential area) cannot be listed on OpenStreetMap (OSM).

If you do have a physical store, I would appreciate it if you could provide a picture of the exterior and interior as proof (a picture of the street where your store is clearly visible and a picture of the inside of the store).
Thank you for your understanding.

Edwin Comino
Connected Shop (2025-09-01 23:56:52+00:00): Hello. I replied to your email verifying that while we don't currently accept Bitcoin (BTC) directly, our website does offer cryptocurrency payments through USDC (it's been added to our payment options).

Regarding the requirement for a physical location for OpenStreetMap, I want to confirm that we are a fully registered business entity with a legitimate commercial address. Although we operate online, our company address listed on our site is officially registered with the state of Florida. You can verify our status directly on Sunbiz.org, the official Florida Division of Corporations website. If you search for our entity name, CONNECTED SHOP INC, you will find our active registration, physical address, and our Federal IRS EIN number.
AgusQui (2025-09-11 03:55:53+00:00): La infraestructura de la parada sigue ahí, por lo tanto lo correcto es dejarla como disused:highway=bus_stop en vez de eliminarla
PNCHR (2025-09-01 23:11:48+00:00): Added the number of lanes (1)
bxl-forever (2025-09-01 22:50:25+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Thanks for your recent edits.
However, can you please make sure to write real changeset titles when you send uploads to the database.

"adding data" is not an acceptable changeset description. It provides no useful information. After all, we are all adding data here.

More explanations on the OpenStreetMap wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks in advance.
PNCHR (2025-09-01 23:10:42+00:00): Sorry! You’re right, I’ll keep that in mind next time.
Added the number of lanes (1) for Spiegelstraat (Ternat).
Bauer33333 (2025-09-01 21:20:29+00:00): Hi, I've noticed that you are removing the info from crossings whether there are signals, eg. by changing crossing=traffic_signals to crossing=marked. Is this intentional? Thanks
beddy (2025-09-01 21:50:49+00:00): Hi Bauer33333.  Removing, no.  Updating tags, yes.  Many of the items added/changed in this changeset didn't have ways, or were not fully described.  Rapid should, upon adding decritive tags such as a Marked Lines Crossing, preserve crossing signals tags.  I spot checked this changeset just now and I can't find what you mention... do you have an example crossing?
Bauer33333 (2025-09-02 07:23:37+00:00): I always appreciate people adding something else then crossing:markings=yes :)
Examples would be eg. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4344793665 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4344793659
cowboyxup (2025-09-01 22:12:45+00:00): Hallo M_Gaugg,
danke für deinen Versuch, alte Tags zu aktualisieren. 
Leider sind jetzt viele public_transport=platform doppelt vorhanden, als seperate Objekt. 

Hast du nur die Warnungen von ID versucht zu lösen? Diese sind leider nicht immer richtig.
cowboyxup (2025-09-02 08:28:06+00:00): Bei den bereits als seperate angelegte public_transport=platform durch Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171348807 wieder entfernt.
eggie (2025-09-02 08:28:29+00:00): Op de kruising met de Bosscheweg zit nog een stukje Hoevense Kanaaldijk

Dat lijkt me niet logisch.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2025-09-02 08:32:11+00:00): Waarom staat op het zuidelijk deel tot de Spoorbrug Lovense Kanaaldijk (west en oost) los van elkaar. In de BGT staat het aan elkaar geschreven net als het verder verloop naar het noorden?
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=135716.75&geometry.y=397121.88&zoomlevel=13.55

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-02 08:34:44+00:00): Hij de Hoevensekanaaldijk / Hoevense Kanaaldijk is ook iets dergelijks aan de hand. Misschien dat Frank Overman het weet?
eggie (2025-09-02 20:15:51+00:00): Zou het inderdaad oplossen met official_name=..
en name=..
En dan alles consistent maken, maar ik weet niet hoe de straatnaamborden er verderop uit zien.
gr eggie
donux-nl (2025-09-02 20:39:57+00:00): Emvee gaat het oplossen: 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/korte-vragen-met-hopelijk-een-kort-antwoord/127479/181
donux-nl (2025-09-02 20:42:31+00:00): Als het goed is, dan is dat stukje Hoevense Kanaaldijk bij de Bosscheweg nu ook weg. Of zie ik dat over het hoofd?
eggie (2025-09-02 20:44:57+00:00): Hoi.. Dat heb ik net aangepast.
Denk dat het wel goed komt hier.
Comino (2025-09-01 21:38:54+00:00): Hi,

As mentioned in my email to you earlier today, only physical stores are allowed on OSM (OpenStreetMap), not online shops. Businesses that are not clearly identifiable as a store or office (for example, if they are located in a residential area) cannot be listed on OpenStreetMap (OSM).

If you do have a physical store, I would appreciate it if you could provide a picture of the exterior and interior as proof (a picture of the street where your store is clearly visible and a picture of the inside of the store).
Thank you for your understanding.

Edwin Comino
Udarian (2025-09-01 21:51:16+00:00): this changeset removed the obviously incorrect building=yes that was added to the business in changeset 171333082. I also left questions on a previous changeset of the users (171005707). I just fixed the obviously incorrect aspects of the business as I do not have the time to check if they exist but do not want bad data in OSM in this region so I fix what I can.
Hungerburg (2025-09-17 09:16:07+00:00): Hallo M, es geht um diesen Hinweis - https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4965052

Du hast den Knoten zuletzt bearbeitet. Was sagst du dazu?

PS: Auf der Straße/Fahrbahn ist wenn dann die "stop_position", nicht die "platform".
Đuro Jiří (2026-01-13 09:01:06+00:00): Sei sicuro, che lavori già iniziati? Hai messo check_date=2025-09-01, però io una settimana dopo non ho visto nulla.

https://api.panoramax.xyz/?s=fm;s2;p6e862259-a158-41cf-a6c7-4dd8ae2f5e09;c344.87/0.48/30;m16.09/45.64449/12.595161
jioele (2026-01-13 10:10:05+00:00): Sembra ci siano stati dei ritardi, ma l'opera vera e propria verrà costruita da "Consorzio Stabile Europeo Costruttori di Perugia" in un altra sede e poi verrà trasportata qui nel cantiere che verrà gradualmente assemblata, se vai nel parcheggio affianco al Mc Donald's e il parchetto  verde si possono vedere le recinzioni di dove presumibilmente si svolgeranno i lavori di assemblaggio, per quanto riguarda i lavori collegati a questa opera, in sede posso confermarti che di recente nella rotatoria ho visto che stavano facendo dei lavori alle reti interrate quasi sicuramente collegati al sovrappasso dove tecnicamente almeno i lavori preliminari sono iniziati.
SteffoStefonion (2025-09-08 02:20:09+00:00): The building which you changed to under construction has been completed, i will fix the error but please do not change it back
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-09-17 22:19:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 172087218 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism in Cairo.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18743
Living_man (2025-09-02 03:48:45+00:00): greetings, i will publicly mention here that i'm against these additions. . . but will not do any revert actions. Let the locals of Austin, Travis County know  this 🙏
rempshaener (2025-09-02 15:30:23+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Eine kleine Anmerkung: Hydranten sollten nicht mit Straßen, Gebäuden u. ä. verbunden werden. Das lässt sich leicht beheben: im Editor markieren und „E“ drücken – das löst den Hydranten von der Linie.
Viele Grüße
JRKPirna (2025-09-05 20:40:42+00:00): Hallo! Danke ich werde darauf mit Achten!
gscholz (2025-11-13 08:33:55+00:00): Hi confidence_19,
this changeset has shaped way into a rectangular item:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=171336346

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216865838/history

This is fixed now.
Guido
VictorIE (2025-09-03 08:25:46+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833901795

This looks a bit wonky ("Self-intersecting way").
Dafo43 (2025-09-03 12:48:48+00:00): fixed
ralley (2025-09-02 00:16:13+00:00): You previously added this McDonalds and it was removed as fantasy mapping after you didn't answer questions on that changeset.  It still does not appear at https://mcdonalds.co.nz/find-us/restaurants and in aerial imagery looks to be a residential property.  Additionally your changeset comment is non-sensical.  Is this a genuine McDonalds?
ralley (2025-09-02 00:19:07+00:00): Personal identifying information does not belong in OSM.  Additionally the information appears to be fake
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171337411
user_5359 (2025-10-01 09:04:24+00:00): The statement that online shops are not allowed is not correct. 
Online shops without an address and massive amounts of SPAM are undesirable because they do not exist for OSM topics (and cannot be validated). 
Likewise, labelling it as amenity=marketplace is certainly incorrect (the tag office=online_shop would be more correct). 
If you don't mind, I would re-enter it with the key office.
Comino (2025-10-01 23:29:20+00:00): Merchants with a verifiable physical store AND an online shop are welcome on OSM. I agree. However, businesses that cannot be clearly identified as a store or office, such as those located in residential areas, are not eligible to be listed on OSM.
In the case of The Connected Shop, there is no physical address provided. Their website only mentions "Miami Beach FL," and their store or office appears to be located within an apartment complex.
user_5359 (2025-09-04 06:49:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You import many nodes with unknown keys ( it could be a corrupted data structure) and without any comment! I have reverted your change set.
user_5359 (2025-09-04 06:52:29+00:00): If you need help, You are welcome!
FajrAl (2026-06-23 10:35:36+00:00): They are from surveyed PoI, but they have no correct tags to render.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173302164
user_5359 (2025-09-04 16:21:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add the key AED. Did you mean https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator ?
MassCartog (2025-12-23 17:15:27+00:00): User michael60634 downvoted this commit in retaliation, nothing is wrong with it.
quincylvania (2025-12-12 21:22:44+00:00): Hello! Just noticed this changeset and am wondering if we can discuss further. I agree Long Island Sound is different than a bay like the Chesapeake Bay, but I wouldn't call it open ocean. I think the flowlines are useful here but maybe I'm missing something?
ZeLonewolf (2025-12-13 02:58:45+00:00): Yea I encountered a bunch of lines drawn in pretty silly ways noted in this discussion:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-feature-proposal-flowlines/117361/32

so that's probably the venue
Myazyk (2025-09-02 18:30:26+00:00): Не склеюй межі села із ріками, стежками тощо
Ростислав Кирій (2025-09-02 19:32:30+00:00): Дякую за зауваження - я візьму це до уваги - на майбутнє.
5m4u9 (2025-09-03 14:47:04+00:00): Hola, bienvenid@ y gracias por querer mejorar el mapa.

Lo que editaste está mal :(, pero descuida ya lo solucioné. 

Las calles no pueden ser puntos específicos, sino son líneas y ya están dibujadas. 

Quién manda la tarea? hay muchísimos datos que se necesita mapear en santa cruz... si tienes dudas puedes preguntar mandando un mensaje pinchando en el usuario.
dp7 (2025-09-02 07:58:36+00:00): Hello smallCat, thanks for your update but please don't include such extended areas in a unique changeset. Divide your changes in separate changeset for each area. Thanks !
fortera_au (2025-09-02 22:08:37+00:00): @dp7, mechanical edits are usually going to have a wide area covered, however they are well documented as per the wiki and forum links.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171339818
dp7 (2025-09-03 09:51:13+00:00): Hi Au, I don't want to complain about a consolidated and community-accepted way of working, but I wonder: couldn't these mechanical edits, for example, be separated by country? Or by small-sized bboxes? What do you think?
fortera_au (2025-09-03 09:59:18+00:00): That can often be complex when making automated edits. The "keep bbox size small" thing is just a guideline, and this is a common exception to that, since theres a pretty decent process around the edit itself and prior community consultation.
Living_man (2025-09-02 03:51:58+00:00): greetings, i will publicly mention here that i'm against these additions. . . but will not do any revert actions. Let the locals of Austin, Travis County know this 🙏

first mention: changeset 171336102
Gregory Peony (2025-09-02 04:48:38+00:00): Hi, there are several mistakes in this changeset and some invalid data uploaded. 

In short they are; 
1. Poor building footprint accuracy
2. Waterway tagged as highway
3. Pond mapped as a building

I resolved these issues in changesets;
171341820
171341982
171341955

When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you can see the outline of the building and mark the corners carefully. Exclude shadows and yards when tracing the footprint. Keep in mind that you are looking at the roofs of buildings, but mapping their footprints. Depending on how the scene is lit, pitched roofs may have light and dark sections that belong to one building. Generally pitched roofs overhang the walls of a building, so a footprint slightly smaller than the roof is accurate. You can scale selected features in ID with shift+(-/+), or JOSM with ctrl.+alt+Lclick & drag.  Take care to make contributions that others can build upon.

when mapping highways and waterways check along them to identify what they are.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 22:02:01+00:00): Removed SEO spam and cleaned up other tags for POI Outdoor Warehouse Supply in changeset 183801381

https://osm.org/changeset/183801381
Carto'Cité (2026-02-06 11:11:52+00:00): Hello.
You have significantly modified the shape of the "Salle d'échange" at level -4  of Les Halles station. I am wondering what sources you used to do so. I did map the RER station in 2022 using plans that described a restructuration project. I can't imagine you made those changes with "knowledge and Bing as the only sources ;-)  Did you have access to accurate plans that show the actual layout of the station ? If those plans can be shared I'd be interested to have them. 
Antoine from Carto’Cité on behalf of SNCF #Transilien
Alexey Lukin (2026-02-06 16:29:08+00:00): Hi Antoine, I have used the following plans mostly taken from the 2009 Réaménagement presentation:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KgWuzUxwpUx1j6PMOYDwpgnsfzgt898O/view
If you have better plans, I'm happy to correct my mapping.
Yog Sot (2025-09-02 11:46:08+00:00): you did survey  and still maps a cycleway across an aspkhalt street to have paving stones?
Seriously, if you add details, do em right.
Yog Sot (2025-09-02 12:15:25+00:00): i have fixed it, but you were right to map paving stones, only those were in minority at sections
gendy54 (2025-09-30 21:52:57+00:00): Bonjour,

La route est rouverte ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-09 17:37:23+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13113938862/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Baloo Uriza (2025-09-03 13:17:37+00:00): You missed the through|right lane and incorrectly added a maxheight.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171342837