piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ayanbs (2026-06-02 22:03:08+00:00): (tracktype changes)
Jan Olieslagers (2026-06-03 15:29:48+00:00): Regarding way 1304615560 , which you tagged as a runway: is this really in use for aviation? It seems a bit queer, with absolutely no other infrastructure to be discerned...
VictorIE (2026-06-03 17:26:08+00:00): Note says yes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5024878

The other contributor seems to be local.
VictorIE (2026-06-03 18:20:58+00:00): If you look at the Esri World Imagery, you can see a white Cessna 172 or similar about midway along the runway.

Oh, and I agree it looks a bit daft.
Jan Olieslagers (2026-06-03 18:46:40+00:00): Thanks very much. And yes, the aeroplane at mid-runway is obvious proof, I ought to have observed that before making comments. Sorry!
I have now added node 13907904324, to make this airstrip available to route planners - those do not go from runway to runway, they go from aerodrome to aerodrome. Feel free to modify it as you see appropriate! And by the way, I used to be a pilot, but would have thought twice before landing my humble OO-G86 here! Kind regards,
BCNorwich (2026-06-03 05:00:21+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've mapped a house from imagery near to your 4 Ranger Close node. Is this the house the node refers to?

Regards Bernard.
Thecube (2026-06-03 05:53:10+00:00): Hi Bernard. . 4 Ranger Close, Billericay CM11 2FG is a new build Property. So I’m to add the house and the road to the map but I’m
Not exactly sure how to. 4 Ranger Close CM11 2FG is showing on Apple Maps &
google maps. The what 3 words are ///farmer.number.inspector. Any assistance you can provide here would be most welcome. Thank you
BCNorwich (2026-06-03 06:28:15+00:00): Hi, The house I mapped has not yet had time to render, this is a direct at which you should be able to see the house link:- https://tinyurl.com/mr365mc2

If that is the outline of your house I can transfer your tags?

It takes time, (hours to days or weeks) for newly mapped things to appear on third party maps.

Regards Bernard.
Thecube (2026-06-04 12:46:35+00:00): Hi Bernard, yes the outline of our house looks good, I’m not familiar with this website at all unfortunately so if you’re happy adding what’s necessary so we can get our house on the map, we also need to get the actual Road Ranger Close CM11 2FG on the map. Are you able to add that at all, the road goes from our house to Southend Road
BCNorwich (2026-06-04 15:15:29+00:00): Hi, I've put your house tags on the building. I've added the road to the NW of the building, that's the imagery line where it comes off of Southend Road.

Hope that's OK, anything else please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
Thecube (2026-06-04 19:35:08+00:00): That’s brilliant, thanks so much Bernard. Just one quick question, the road says Road Ranger Close when I see it on the map, is that right that it says Road on it ?
BCNorwich (2026-06-05 04:43:48+00:00): Hi, Sorry about that, I copied the name directly from your comment:-  "we also need to get the actual Road Ranger Close CM11 2FG on the map."

All good now.

Regards Bernard.
Thecube (2026-06-05 06:28:00+00:00): Excellent, thanks again Bernard for all your help, much appreciated
Sébastien Pi (2026-06-03 07:42:48+00:00): Hello,

Please consider to use better comments for your changeset: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Most of your latest change are commented with “Several improvements”. This is very generic and do not help to understand what is changed.

Kind regards
tguen (2026-06-05 02:30:24+00:00): Why are you adding elevation data to buildings? Where did the height data come from?
tguen (2026-06-05 02:32:27+00:00): The height tag measures the height from ground level, not the part below it. You've made a hole in the center of Wells Fargo Tower
Nakaner-repair (2026-06-09 09:51:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183866122, 183866141, 183866143, 183866127 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by ticki_52 since CS 183039302, see https://c.osm.org/t/144453 for details
karson_ (2026-07-02 00:15:50+00:00): You can't blindly add a tunnel everywhere that a waterway intersects a road. In this edit, you added tunnels to waterways despite the waterways not being located in those locations (presumably low-quality imports or realigned).
sarya_Lyft (2026-07-03 09:12:09+00:00): Hi karson_,

Thanks a lot for sharing your observations. I’m Surander, a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. I added the layer=-1 & tunnel=culvert tags only at the location where the road intersects the waterway. This was based on the OSM Wiki guidelines and is also clearly supported by Lyft-owned aerial imagery (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1x1XYIscDyZ1La2QIId5JPQdz7VDmoJI3/view?usp=sharing) dated 11 April 2026.Since the remaining section of the waterway does not affect routing,I left it unchanged.

I hope this clarifies the reasoning behind my edits. I'm happy to answer any additional questions regarding my changesets or discuss this further if needed. 
Regards,

Surander
MappingMore (2026-06-07 07:01:39+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset ID:183765754
noahheffron (2026-06-03 01:58:13+00:00): This is not a residential road, it really is a golf cart path; verified on site a couple weeks ago and had tagged appropriately per posted signs
alokchauhan_Lyft (2026-06-04 05:13:58+00:00): Hello noahheffron,
Thank you for reaching out and bringing this to my attention & fixing the mistake. My name is Alok, and I am a mapper on Lyft's OSM team.
I changed the ways to residential roads based on GPS traces data, but after reviewing your feedback, I recognize that this was an oversight on my part. I sincerely apologize for the mistake and for any inconvenience my edits may have caused.
Now I agree with you that it is actually a golf cart path, which is also supported by satellite imagery. Thank you for helping improve the accuracy of OpenStreetMap and for your contributions.

Regards,
Alok
dknelson9876 (2026-06-05 02:16:48+00:00): Hi Rax,

When you added this name, did you realize it was a kindergarten? Is ARUP really operating a kindergarten inside their lab?
Rax Ventus (2026-06-05 02:22:24+00:00): Hello!
Yes, ARUP is operating a childcare center on site.
https://www.aruplab.com/benefits/perks
Rax Ventus (2026-06-05 02:26:18+00:00): It may also be of note that the building labelled "ARUP Laboratories Central Facility" and building 540 right next to it are physically connected and function as a singular workplace/building.
Ewen Hill (2026-06-03 04:23:54+00:00): Hi Nick, do you have any details regarding this extension of the Normaton- Croydon to Forsyth railway please?  It's about 150km with no significant mineral resources and I can't see any mention of it
Ewen Hill (2026-06-04 21:32:06+00:00): Hi Nick, I am just following this edit up. Can you please let us know the source of the new "railroad". If nothing is heard, I will revert this changeset.
Ewen Hill (2026-06-06 07:04:11+00:00): Hi Nick, The budget was rejected twice for this section of line by the Qld Senate, the latest in around 1922 before they voted themselves out. There is no construction and the current railway to the east is closed in parts due to flood damage and will be for some time to come. 

I have reverted your addition of a railway in changeset #183724509
and  this is of all your changesets...
183568308
183568159
183568058
183567847
183181371
183181257

I have a copy of the railway you generated if you wish. Please feel free to reach out if you want some advice about mapping.

Ewen
OSGeo Oceania
Hash_96 (2026-06-03 02:34:19+00:00): Proof - Local knowledge + Order stated in PY Government site (ppa.py.gov.in/sites/default/files/minutes-28.08.2025.pdf) found under Agenda No.1
MappingMore (2026-06-04 08:40:14+00:00): Reverted in changeset ID:183631669
Wildsharky (2026-06-10 05:27:15+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:183675413
AK369-9 (2026-06-10 10:29:14+00:00): Hello,
My name is Abhishek Kushwaha my OSM username is AK369-9. I am a student and I added these points for my ongoing school Science Project. Since I am quite new to OSM, I am still learning the guidelines.Could you please let me know what was wrong with my 'adding point' so I can correct it properly? I would really appreciate your guidance. 
Thank you!
Wildsharky (2026-06-17 04:56:22+00:00): Hello AK369-9, 
thank you for your contribution and reaching out to me. It’s great to hear about your interest in learning the best practices in OSM. 

In this specific case, the fenced area should have the relevant tags, instead of the separate node within, and I’ve made the corrections. 

Please always make sure to review the relevant documentation from OSM Wiki, in this case https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park. 
That way you’ll always make sure to follow the community standards. 
Happy mapping.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-03 03:51:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/275021073

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MappingMore (2026-06-07 06:51:27+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset ID:183765528
arjunaraoc (2026-06-07 12:18:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183571868
Wildsharky (2026-06-10 05:26:26+00:00): Reverted in changeset id:183673219
Kovoschiz (2026-06-04 10:14:32+00:00): Connecting the circle directly with the L-shape distorts the turns (unless it's anti-clockwise)
habi (2026-07-10 08:15:06+00:00): Ciao x_fma_x
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours werden in OpenStreetMap mit englischen Abkürzungen erfasst, ich hab' dein 'Mi' und 'So' korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185458931

Gruss, 
habi

PS: Ich bin hier wegen https://opening-hours.pages.dev/schweiz-suisse-svizzera-svizra/bern-berne
x_fma_x (2026-07-10 16:58:13+00:00): Merci Habi.
LambdaComplex (2026-06-04 23:44:32+00:00): The mapping for these foot paths is quite peculiar, are you sure this is correct?
IndusValleyDesert (2026-06-08 16:21:02+00:00): Hi  LambdaComplex,
Thank you for reaching out, I added these footways because there is a visible sidewalk in Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3659947807558282). If you believe this isn’t necessary, I am open to removing these footways and retaining the footway crossing tags.
LambdaComplex (2026-06-10 15:03:59+00:00): I inquired as i thought there was the probability of it being an automated edit, but i see now. Thanks for the response
Bovi887 (2026-06-03 14:08:43+00:00): Hi xSabinaE,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Instead of changing the station type, you've changed the platform to a station. So now there are two station elements. The station is tagged on a seperate node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5205931550
This node has station=halt which already looks good to me, as this is how stations without railway switches are usually tagged.

I've changed the platform back to a platform.

Happy mapping,
Bovi887
Mxdanger (2026-06-03 21:14:38+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183614314
Mxdanger (2026-06-03 21:14:53+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183614314
Mxdanger (2026-06-03 21:51:24+00:00): Please use access restrictions. Do not delete roads or convert them into gates. You can create a gate node by the entrance to the gated community.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183572998
Mxdanger (2026-06-03 21:52:32+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-03 06:11:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11243968559

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:42:43+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570668
Wildsharky (2026-06-10 05:29:14+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:183680149
MappingMore (2026-06-07 07:30:02+00:00): Reverted in changeset ID:183766529
MarcoR (2026-06-03 08:32:26+00:00): Il tratto di Via di Salviano way/75488514 l'hai messo residential e per me va bene perché il traffico lì è molto basso (anche se ci passa(va?) una linea di bus) ma dal lato opposto della ferrovia non puoi interrompere la tua nuova tertiary con una residential (way/144163138) o addirittura una service (way/78360330): serve continuità nel grafo stradale soprattutto con le classi più alte. 

Tra l'altro highway=service non si usa per quel tipo di strade (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice)

Poi il solito problema che non ti piacciono le rotatorie e togli il tag junction=roundabout dove lo trovi (vedi way/652968682, way/652968684, way/652968685 e way/45628750).

Questo modo di mappare non va bene e rasenta il vandalismo.

Buon "mapping",
Marco
bartgron (2026-06-03 08:13:04+00:00): Zestaw zmian jest nieprawidłowy i został wycofany.
Pozdrawiam
FroschForscher (2026-06-17 18:57:11+00:00): Hi, ich habe folgende Verbesserungsvorschläge zu diesen Änderungen:
- An der B 465 ist noch cycleway:both=no gesetzt. Das sollte im betroffenen abschnitt (B 465 aufteilen) in cycleway:right=no cycleway:left=separate ersetzt werden.
- Wenn der Radweg benutzungspflichtig ist, bicycle=use_sidepath an der B 465 setzen.
- Wenn es kein reiner Radweg ist sonder auch von Fußgänger genutzt wird sollte der Weg als "Rad- und Fußweg" erfasst werden.

FroschForscher
tom-frey (2026-06-19 13:14:49+00:00): Habe die vorgeschlagenen Punkte 1 und 3 erledigt. Punkt 2 kann ich nichts dazu sagen
FroschForscher (2026-06-22 13:00:39+00:00): Danke
chris_seas (2026-06-04 09:49:28+00:00): Hi (j'ai écrit le même message en français en dessous),

Many of the buildings you have created overlap with existing ones. It seems this changeset needs to be deleted. This isn’t the first time this user has made edits without taking existing data into account. Thank you, Anthony, for being careful with your edits on OSM.

In french : Il y a beaucoup de bâtiments que vous avez créé qui sont superposé avec des bâtiments existants. Il semble qu'il faille supprimer ce changeset. Ce n'est pas la première fois que cette utilisateur fait une édition sans tenir compte de l'existant. Merci Anthony de faire attention à vos éditions sur OSM.
CRCulver (2026-06-03 07:44:22+00:00): When you are editing existing POIs that have the inappropriate backslash character, do not upload the changeset until you have deleted the backslash.
MenKauRa (2026-06-03 08:44:51+00:00): Thank you. I'll take that into account.
OSM-Arno (2026-06-08 15:53:02+00:00): Between Broby and Kristianstad, the road 19 does not have two separate carriageways. This is actually incorrect and means that some permitted turns are not valid ( as with your changes). I think road 19 should be handled like other highway=primary with oncoming traffic and undivided lanes.
leojth (2026-06-09 21:55:51+00:00): Hi! I haven't visited the area recently, but I'm quite sure it is a divided road now. The project's main goal is to rebuild it to a divided road with barrier (https://www.trafikverket.se/vara-projekt/projekt-i-skane-lan/vag-19-bjarlovbroby-motesfri-vag/). Local newspapers have also published a couple of articles with photos confirming this, for example (https://www.kristianstadsbladet.se/ostra-goinge/lopare-tog-chansen-innan-vagen-blir-forbjuden-mark/) and (https://www.kristianstadsbladet.se/ostra-goinge/nya-vag-19-bjarlov-hanaskog-oppnar-den-1-juni/). On Esri imagery you can clearly see the new line and the indirect left turns (spanish turns). Please note that my changes only cover the newly opened section west of Bössebacken, not north of Hanaskog or south of Bjärlöv. If you have other sources (maybe been there recently?) please feel free to update.
Happy mapping!
OSM-Arno (2026-06-10 10:24:34+00:00): Hi! Thanks a lot for the information. Thought they just rebuild the surface. Looks like a bigger project than I thought...
I'm going to take a little detour today and check out the section between M2591 and Broby (also tracking with GPS)
Thanks again, and have an nice day!
OSM-Arno (2026-06-12 11:09:54+00:00): Hi again!
I checked the road on Wednesday. You're absolutely right. It looks like everything is being set up for two separate lanes.

Since it's all passable in both directions now and all turns are possible, I removed the one-way tag in two places and fixed some turns. The routing should be okay again now. For everything else, we need to wait for some images....
Have nice day!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184011305
habi (2026-06-03 07:35:09+00:00): No, closing https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5317131 :)
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:42:44+00:00): DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185570668
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-12 03:29:13+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20935
Sébastien Pi (2026-06-08 18:48:07+00:00): Bonsoir Yasmina,

Ce changement est remonté sur Osmose : https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issue/e5ad64c2-0d06-32cd-0007-821002150a2e

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193913892/history a toujours été cyclable depuis le début et il y a 4 relations distinctes cyclables qui passent dessus. Dont les points-nœuds qui existent depuis des années.

Il me paraît peu probable que bicycle=no soit la bonne valeur. Est-ce un constat sur place ?

Merci
user_23884811 (2026-06-03 13:20:26+00:00): Merhaba, değişikliğinizin incelenmesini istediğiniz için yazıyorum.

Eklediğiniz ikinci adı ikinci bir ad gibi değil de sanki "Mesa Cadde"nin "Türkçesi" gibi eklemişsiniz. Bu gibi durumlar için kullandığınız düzenleme uygulamasında "Detay ekle" bölümünden "Alternatif ad"ı seçip ekleyebiliyorsunuz.

Ben şurada düzelttim: changeset/183593993

İyi çalışmalar.
Utkay Alptuğ Oğuzkurt (2026-06-03 13:23:28+00:00): Selamlar,

Düzenlemeniz ve yönlendirmeniz için teşekkür ederim. Bundan sonra dikkat ediyor olacağım.


İyi çalışmalar dilerim.
9_tab (2026-07-04 10:51:36+00:00): There is a note about this feature at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5365214 . Maybe you can help there?
Luzandro (2026-06-18 11:03:21+00:00): Hallo,

bitte verbinde kreuzende Wege mit einem Schnittpunkt und die Enden von separat erfassten Gehsteigen mit der Fahrbahn, ansonsten sind die Wege für das Routing unbrauchbar.

Zumindest für ersteres hat auch der iD-Editor vor dem Hochladen eine entspr. Warnung angezeigt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183580721
mga_geo (2026-06-05 08:07:39+00:00): Bonjour,
L'application PTNA de contrôle qualité des réseaux de transport signale des "trous" sur Lannion.
Il n'y a plus de chemin entre les deux ronds-points "rue Noël Donval" et "Rue de Buzulzo".
C'est une erreur ?
Marc
le sanglier (2026-06-05 14:39:41+00:00): oui désolé, j'ai manqué d'attention en rajoutant le morceau de voie cyclable, j'espère c'est réparé, je repasse vérifier que j'ai rien oublié plus tard
foreigner037 (2026-07-13 07:05:54+00:00): Здравейте,

highway=primary има съвсем друго значение. Препоръчвам ви да се запознаете с терминологията в уики страниците преди да правите последващи редакции. Тук най-правилно е highway=service. entrance=main също се отнася за сгради, не е събирателен таг за вход.
Robert Whittaker (2026-06-25 09:46:42+00:00): In this changeset you added the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13906541780 for a Barclay's only banking hub.

Are you sure this is one of the Post Office Run Banking hubs (which is open all week, and typically has reps from different banks present on different days) as opposed to a "Barclay's Local" (where it's just Barclay's running a pop-up branch on their own)?
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2026-06-25 12:04:36+00:00): It is NOT a post office hub, it's just Barclays on their own. There is a link to the website and a note to say Barclays only.
All the other banks still have open branches, at least for the moment. 
  I couldent find any examples of the same so I tagged it as best I could. Sorry if that's wrong.
Robert Whittaker (2026-06-25 16:35:45+00:00): No worries, and thanks for the quick response. I think this is a "Barclay's Local" then, a pop-up style of branch that they started using before banking hubs became a thing.
MappingMore (2026-06-04 12:14:02+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset ID:183642010
mueschel (2026-06-04 09:06:07+00:00): Hi,
there are a couple thousand objects with strange tags like "id", "sources" and "has_parts". Please fix this.
What is the source of all this? The changeset source is just "knowledge" which doesn't seem right.
Ionut Paduretu (2026-06-04 09:48:42+00:00): Hi there! These are refined Overture building footprints. I thought keeping these tags would be useful for future edits or modifications, but I'm happy to remove them if needed. The ID is obsolete, since I'm modifying the building footprints anyway as part of the refinement process.
Yukiro (2026-07-16 19:02:23+00:00): Pomnik przyrody nie jest wpisany do GDOŚ
Leo Slager (2026-06-04 13:27:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-06-04 13:30:13+00:00): Hallo snackje,

Alleen de naam doet helaas niets op de kaart en de key craft is bestemd voor een productie locatie.
Ik denk dat shop=beverages de juiste tag is, dan vrschijnt er ook een symbool op de kaart.

ik pas het even aan.
NieWnen (2026-06-04 12:14:15+00:00): Proszę nie usuwaj obiektu, żeby dodać go ponownie, to nieprawidłowe.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
NieWnen (2026-06-04 13:22:05+00:00): W dodatku tagowanie service_times=* w ten sposób jest błędne.
Powinno być zbliżone do opening_hours=*

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:service_times
yelisey90 (2026-06-03 09:39:07+00:00): reverted - the street is with one carriage way only, please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways#Carriageways

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183583593
joost schouppe (2026-07-10 12:31:40+00:00): Merci Fabian,
Si je comprends bien, l'entrée urgences est simplement l'entrée principal? Alors j'ai unifié les deux entrées.
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-05 02:32:27+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20765
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-11 01:25:08+00:00): DWG revert – undiscussed import from unauthorised source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183948416
Leo Slager (2026-06-07 19:57:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-05 11:08:42+00:00): Reverted addition of SEO spam POI with blatantly spammy and self-promotional name=* and description=* in changeset 183689662

https://osm.org/changeset/183689662
Alan Thomas (2026-06-03 09:57:41+00:00): I've made an error on this changeset. I brought Lakewood Lake inside Lakewood Nature Reserve, as it was shown as not part of the reserve. But in doing so I unintentionally brought the lake inside the natural=wood land use. I suppose the natural=wood and leisure=nature_reserve features need to be made separate.
Alan Thomas (2026-06-03 10:02:26+00:00): I reverted the changes to Lakewood Lake in changeset 183584622.
Ze0zohk1 (2026-06-03 10:01:51+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173146501
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-05 11:08:30+00:00): Reverted addition of SEO spam POI with blatantly spammy and self-promotional name=* and description=* in changeset 183689662

https://osm.org/changeset/183689662