piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner-repair (2026-01-15 20:15:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177273589 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism (all changesets by klinterklater). They deleted lots of power infrastructure.
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-15 23:23:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177278244 where the changeset comment is: Löschungen durch klinterklater rückgängig gemacht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19481
Nakaner-repair (2026-01-15 20:15:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177273589 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism (all changesets by klinterklater). They deleted lots of power infrastructure.
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-15 23:23:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177278244 where the changeset comment is: Löschungen durch klinterklater rückgängig gemacht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19481
AndyB_66 (2026-01-15 14:26:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-15 23:23:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177278244 where the changeset comment is: Löschungen durch klinterklater rückgängig gemacht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19481
Serrrek89 (2026-01-15 12:34:43+00:00): Węzeł: 13457780701 do usunięcia. Zła lokalizacja
eggie (2026-01-15 13:27:13+00:00): Welkom bij osm.
Volgens de website zit de instelling op nr 66. Dat is niet hier. Dit is geen adres.
De description is veel te uitgebreid en kan als spam worden behandeld.
Verder doet alleen een naam niets in osm. Geef de aard van de instelling aan.
Graag reactie..
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-01-15 16:21:35+00:00): club verplaatst naar nr66
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 17:46:59+00:00): Hello!

You used
highway=bus_stop 3
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13200871732/history

Have you maybe meant
highway=bus_stop
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Glassman (2026-01-16 22:36:47+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

You removed the traffic_signals tag which lets people know that their is a traffic signal ahead
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177254849
Glassman (2026-01-16 22:36:59+00:00): It has been fixed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177254849
Dominic Z (2026-01-31 16:26:05+00:00): Hallo FALRA,
leider musste ich zum zweiten Mal feststellen, dass du Wege aus der Karte gelöscht hast, obwohl diese in der Realität deutlich erkennbar vorhanden sind. Teilweise sind sie sogar auf dem Luftbild sichtbar.
Bereits bei deiner ersten Änderung habe ich versucht, dich darauf aufmerksam zu machen, dass diese Vorgehensweise nicht in Ordnung ist, selbst wenn es sich um gesperrte Wege handeln sollte (siehe meinen Kommentar zu https://osm.org/changeset/143697151). Dann würden sie entsprechend als gesperrt markiert werden, das ist in diesem Fall allerdings (jedenfalls bei meinem letzten Besuch vor Ort) nicht ersichtlich. Wenn du diesbezüglich andere Informationen hast, die ich vielleicht übersehen habe, teile sie bitte mit, damit wir das korrekt eintragen können.
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-15 23:23:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177278244 where the changeset comment is: Löschungen durch klinterklater rückgängig gemacht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19481
TinPetreković (2026-01-19 09:32:09+00:00): Roads that were split unnecessarily have been merged back together in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177415327
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:31:26+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13327221402 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Math tutoring center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisReview (2026-01-25 08:57:51+00:00): 🗑️ Element deleted by https://osm.org/changeset/177418972
GOwin (2026-01-16 01:53:13+00:00): Good job! 👋Thanks for helping improve the map.

Next time, try to add phone numbers in the international format (i.e. +63xxxxxxxxxx), since it cannot be assumed that callers are always local.
dknelson9876 (2026-01-20 02:43:55+00:00): Hello MSK_222, by what reasoning did you remove junction=circular here? This junction is already unusual for this area, but it was the best tag I could find to express that this has two way traffic along part of it and only some roads have yield signs
Lê Tuấn Minh (2026-01-15 14:59:32+00:00): Con đường này hiện tại còn có dự án cao tốc nối Nghĩa Lộ với nút giao IC14 với cao tốc Nội Bài - Lào Cai đang xây dựng nên con đường ko thể xếp loại secondary được, tôi sẽ cập nhật thêm tình hình dự án để có thể chỉnh sửa thêm
TinPetreković (2026-01-19 10:01:41+00:00): The node that was accidentally created has been removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177416734 since it served no real purpose
Nakaner-repair (2026-01-15 20:15:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177273589 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism (all changesets by klinterklater). They deleted lots of power infrastructure.
Nakaner-repair (2026-01-15 20:15:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177273589 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism (all changesets by klinterklater). They deleted lots of power infrastructure.
Viima (2026-01-24 15:40:51+00:00): Hei! Tervetuloa Openstreetmapiin.

Muokkauksessasi lisäsit tielle 1083289619 portin siirtämällä jo olemassa olevaa pistettä 12889229252. Tämä aiheutti sen, että tie 1392400662 vääntyi poiketen matkakeskukselta Vapaudenkadun toiselle puolelle. 

Korjasin vahingon muutoskokoelmallani 177650831 palauttamalla tien omalle paikalleen ja lisäämällä kokonaan uuden portin 13482004008.

Openstreetmapin wikistä saat tarvittaessa ohjeita kartoittamiseen: wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Aloittelijan_opas

Ystävällisin terveisin
Viima
Nakaner-repair (2026-01-15 20:15:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177273589 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism (all changesets by klinterklater). They deleted lots of power infrastructure.
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-15 23:23:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177278244 where the changeset comment is: Löschungen durch klinterklater rückgängig gemacht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19481
Nakaner-repair (2026-01-15 20:15:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177273589 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism (all changesets by klinterklater). They deleted lots of power infrastructure.
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-15 23:23:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177278244 where the changeset comment is: Löschungen durch klinterklater rückgängig gemacht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19481
Nakaner-repair (2026-01-15 20:15:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177273589 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism (all changesets by klinterklater). They deleted lots of power infrastructure.
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-15 23:23:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177278244 where the changeset comment is: Löschungen durch klinterklater rückgängig gemacht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19481
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-15 23:23:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177278244 where the changeset comment is: Löschungen durch klinterklater rückgängig gemacht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19481
Nakaner-repair (2026-01-15 20:15:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177273589 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism (all changesets by klinterklater). They deleted lots of power infrastructure.
Nakaner-repair (2026-01-15 20:15:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177273589 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism (all changesets by klinterklater). They deleted lots of power infrastructure.
TinPetreković (2026-01-19 10:14:14+00:00): Roads that were split unnecessarily have been merged back together in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177417693
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-15 23:23:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177278244 where the changeset comment is: Löschungen durch klinterklater rückgängig gemacht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19481
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-15 23:23:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177278244 where the changeset comment is: Löschungen durch klinterklater rückgängig gemacht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19481
woodpeck_repair (2026-01-15 23:23:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177278244 where the changeset comment is: Löschungen durch klinterklater rückgängig gemacht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19481
Nakaner-repair (2026-01-15 20:15:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 177273589 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism (all changesets by klinterklater). They deleted lots of power infrastructure.
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:31:27+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/906608253 v3

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Car scrap yard in Ontario"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:57:52+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177672921
(No visible changes after review)
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-08 07:48:29+00:00): Migrate SEO spam POI Smart Auto Wrecker from an address interpolation node to a proper area with correct top-level tagging, and clean up SEO spam tags, in changeset 183813787

https://osm.org/changeset/183813787
kingkingHK (2026-01-15 14:06:19+00:00): Please don't upload personal data to a public database.
NeisBot (2026-01-15 12:46:15+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your changesets and noticed that the cumulative count of your recent edits (6 changesets) shows that 343 of your last 354 changes were deletions. This is quite an unusual proportion, so I wanted to check with you.

Could you please confirm whether these deletions were intentional or if they may have occurred by mistake?

#DeletionsCheck #Cumulative
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=23711266
klinterklater (2026-01-15 14:16:43+00:00): All changes were intentional, as they concerned only confidential and sensitive data, not publicly available information.
kingkingHK (2026-01-15 14:06:12+00:00): Please don't upload personal data to a public database.
Hb- (2026-01-15 19:15:20+00:00): Bitte Vorsicht bei Fließrichtungsänderungen. Die sind mit Satz beim Hochmoorgraben falsch geändert worden.  Denn der fließt Richtung Südosten, siehe Angabe bei 52.50718, 9.34949 im amtlichen Kartenwerk (ALKIS oder AP). 
Irgendwo bei n294989667 muss ein Pumpwerk stehen, dass vom Hochmoorgraben zum Steinhuder Meer hebt.
Ropino (2026-01-15 20:19:41+00:00): Hi,
es ging um https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1463268596 (Fließrichtung Ost)
westlich von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4176111925/
der dort auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41714733
(Richtung West) trifft. Das konnte so nicht passen. Sollte dort Fließrichtung Ost richtig sein, wäre das nächste Problem bei: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4176111924
Dort kommen 2 Gräben an:  1* aus Nordost kommend und 1* von Südost (dort auch dem 'nichts' kommend).  
Wenn ich das falsch geändert habe, dann wären mehrere andere Gräben in der falschen Fließrichtung. Davon ging ich nicht aus.
Ich hatte mich eigentlich nur um Grenzen gekümmert. Beim Entkleben von den Wasserwegen poppte das Problem halt mit auf.  
Bitte gern korrigieren.
VG
knyszy3000 (2026-01-21 08:00:28+00:00): Mimo, że droga jest przejezdna i ludzie z niej już korzystają to remont jeszcze się nie zakończył. Po prostu teraz jest wstrzymany przez ujemne temperatury. Co prawda mało im zostało, ale nadal jest fragment drogi bez asfaltu, a obok drogi stoją walce i inne maszyny. Na ulicach obok są tabliczki informujące o objeździe. Chodniki też nie są skończone. Jak będą temperatury +5 to znowu będą robić. Mimo wszystko chyba lepiej już zostawić jako ukończoną, skoro ludzie rzeczywiście ją tak traktują, a te roboty asfaltowe będą trwały pewnie maksymalnie parę dni w lutym.
Tomek | Yanosik (2026-01-22 13:44:38+00:00): Hej, dziękuję serdecznie za informację.
Wanderer2000 (2026-01-15 13:08:18+00:00): Op de luchtfoto kan ik deze sporen niet zien, in het veld wel? Anders horen ze thuis op OpenHistoricalMap.
juni_vv (2026-01-15 13:28:53+00:00): Nee ze staan niet op de luchtfoto, daarom railway=razed en niet railway=abandoned. Er staan in spijkenisse meerdere razed railways die ook al op de map staan, zoals het gehele trambaanpad en de tramdijk.
Wanderer2000 (2026-01-15 14:12:47+00:00): Het verschil is wel dat op bijv. de tramdijk railway=razed staat gemapt op de weg die over het oude trace loopt. De stukken die door gebouwen heen lopen of totaal onherleidbaar zijn zou ik daar ook verwijderen. 

Vind je het erg als ik de onherleidbare stukken weer verwijder?
juni_vv (2026-01-15 14:15:16+00:00): Aaah duidelijk goed om te weten!! Is goed hoor
msevilla00 (2026-01-16 10:20:18+00:00): Magnífico! Bienvenido a OSM. Si te interesa y quieres ponerte en contacto con la comunidad no dudes en comunicarte con las personas que nos unimos a este proyecto y cuyas vías de contacto las puedes ver en la [wiki](  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Espa%C3%B1a#Contacto)
dp7 (2026-01-16 08:27:23+00:00): Ciao Camoscio Sibillini, grazie per questi importanti aggiornamenti che stai apportando alla mappa. Per favore, cerca di usare delle descrizioni più chiare nei commenti dei changeset, così agevoli gli altri utenti nell'attività di verifica. Grazie e buon mapping !
Taya_S (2026-01-15 19:14:28+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177271607
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2026-01-27 03:13:29+00:00): This changeset connected a bridge to the road it crosses
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177258760
sanjanasharma_lyft (2026-01-29 10:37:55+00:00): Hi Spaghetti Monster,
My name is Sanjana, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for paying attention & fixing my mistake. Agree with you, that there is a level difference between way & way. Please accept my apologies. I’ll be more attentive when pushing changesets up.
Thank you for your contribution to OSM!
Regards,
Sanjana
Taya_S (2026-01-15 19:14:29+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177271607
NeisBot (2026-01-17 16:31:28+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/6727892826 v4

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Dentistry clinic"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-01-25 08:57:52+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/177672922
(No visible changes after review)
Omnific (2026-01-15 18:40:38+00:00): Hey, Black River Elementary/District Office is in Building A in this complex (already mapped slightly south. I checked late last year.
trailrunner13 (2026-01-15 18:54:19+00:00): I believe that information is stale.

Per the school's website (https://www.impactps.org/blackriver/), they list the address as: 16906 116th Ave SE. 

This had me stumped for a while since https://eds.ospi.k12.wa.us/DirectoryEDS.aspx and https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/index.asp still show 16950 116th Ave SE. 

When I switched the OSM iD editor to use "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" I could see there's now a building at 16906 116th Ave SE which, according to date stamps in G StreetView, was built sometime in 2018: https://maps.app.goo.gl/LXV9pmToFsTccari7

If you have ground truth information to say the school website is stale and they are now occupying 16950, then I can move it back, but all the clues I could see lead me to 16906.

Thanks for questioning. I'm trying to add office locations for every school district in OR and WA... very time consuming to try to get it all right.
trailrunner13 (2026-01-15 18:57:29+00:00): I just realized I failed to delete the pin at 16950. Depending on your feedback, I'll take action.
Omnific (2026-01-15 21:33:33+00:00): My guess is that the address data is stale since I imported that data over 6-7 years ago, so maybe the address nodes are in the wrong place now. Building A is much newer, or at least recently refreshed as of my visit last year. I'll try to ground truth it next time I'm in the area.
trailrunner13 (2026-01-16 14:42:49+00:00): I didn't delete the 16906 address node you placed "about 7 years ago": https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6036074387/history/2. It was updated about 2 years ago by another user. It's position is where I added the new building feature and moved the school and school district to.

However, I just checked https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/ and they show 16906 to be approx. where Building A is located. So I guess the new building is something else.

I'm going to move the school back to Building A as well as the school district, then delete the 16906 address node and move on.
Omnific (2026-01-16 15:58:38+00:00): Cool, that works. I'll check in person eventually.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-26 13:05:16+00:00): Hello!

You used
place=islet;
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364742092/history

Have you maybe meant
place=islet
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
andershl (2026-01-26 13:28:26+00:00): Outline had islet, name point had island. Join made islet;island. Simply forgot to remove the ;
eiger (2026-01-18 16:35:53+00:00): Votre modification concerne un point géodésique de l'IGN. Supprimer la description du point n'améliore en rien la sécurité, étant donné que la base de donnée publique de l'IGN reste parfaitement accessible, avec descriptions et photos. Voir https://fiches-geodesie.ign.fr/fiches/pdf/6813401.pdf

Avant de supprimer des informations dans OpenStreetMap, merci de lancer une discussion sur le forum.
Taya_S (2026-01-15 19:14:30+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177271607
Félinx (2026-01-16 22:59:57+00:00): The street is with the good tags. I just add the link with the path in the park.
Taya_S (2026-01-15 19:15:08+00:00): Reverted sockpuppet edits

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177271634
dmjab13 (2026-01-15 14:50:11+00:00): please try to keep edits like to smaller, locally focused batches
Andrea Musuruane (2026-01-16 08:59:24+00:00): Please do not copy data from Wikipedia. Wikipedia is licensed under CC-BY-SA which is not compatible for import in OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177259334
Epic Story Media (2026-01-15 20:09:47+00:00): Nice
eggie (2026-01-15 18:41:41+00:00): Dag Innax,

format phone begint met +31 in OSM.

MVG
eggie
INNAX (2026-01-16 10:37:20+00:00): Dag eggie,
Bedankt voor de opmerking, ik heb het telefoonnummer aangepast

Groeten,
INNAX
eggie (2026-01-16 10:58:58+00:00): 👍
Frank Peng (2026-01-16 22:00:10+00:00): Hello Aline, I curious on the source for the removal of this "non existent" road. This changeset's tags stated that the source for the removal of this road is aerial imagery. However, I can clearly see the road here in 2019 Bing imagery, 2022 Esri imagery, and Mapbox imagery (imagery date unknown). It's an unpaved or (probably) dirt road leading to a home. If that road still exists there on the ground, then you could've adjusted the road's geometry and retagged it to highway=service + service=driveway. Also note that we do not delete roads or other map elements on private property. Deleting roads or other map elements on private property is considered vandalism and a violation of OSM's Terms of Use. Instead, we can usually add the tag access=private to roads on private property. Any roads or other map elements that we can verify exists on the ground is valid OSM data regardless of if it's on public or private property.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
Frank Peng (2026-01-17 04:37:11+00:00): *Grammar-corrected comment*:

Hello Aline, I'm curious about the source for the removal of this "non existent" road. This changeset's tags stated that the source for the removal of this road is aerial imagery. However, I can clearly see the road here in 2019 Bing imagery, 2022 Esri imagery, and Mapbox imagery (imagery date unknown). It's an unpaved or (probably) dirt road leading to a home. If that road still exists there on the ground, then you could've adjusted the road's geometry and retagged it to highway=service + service=driveway. Also note that we do not delete roads or other map elements on private property. Deleting roads or other map elements on private property is considered vandalism and a violation of OSM's Terms of Use. Instead, we can usually add the tag access=private to roads on private property. Any roads or other map elements that we can verify exist on the ground are valid OSM data, regardless of whether it's on public or private property.
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
Rainero (2026-03-20 16:13:35+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180167185
(unzulässige Quelle)
Ltrlg (2026-01-16 07:37:30+00:00): Pourquoi un layer=-1 sur node/1467283172 ? Il est à peu près certain que les bâtiments sont simplement accolés l’un à l’autre plutôt que l’un au-dessus de l’autre.
Ltrlg (2026-01-16 07:37:52+00:00): Pardon, way/1467283172.
Pierre49976 (2026-01-16 19:38:07+00:00): Une erreur de débutant. Merci pour votre vigilance :)
Ltrlg (2026-01-19 09:34:25+00:00): 👍
Fizzie-DWG (2026-01-18 04:48:34+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19492
stasiu512 (2026-01-15 19:22:28+00:00): Cześć, co masz na myśli dając website na chodniku? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256180184