piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Yog Sot (2025-04-25 17:30:38+00:00): z path nie ma dyskusji. 
Natomiast nie mapujemy tego jak cos chcemy, tlyko tak jak jest i koniec kropka. 
Po chodniku zakaz jest jazdu wzdłuż pojazdem czyli rowerem i jest na to tag ewentualnie `dismount`

Jak nic się nie zadzieje, po prostu sam wycofam nieprawidłowe dane. Jednakże zachęcam do kontaktu z zarządem dróg.
eggie (2025-04-24 20:57:24+00:00): De trap is korter. Ik heb deze ingekort en de routering weer mogelijk gemaakt. Ik gebruik als bron een transparant van de BGT.
maro21 (2025-04-25 18:02:03+00:00): Proszę nie usuwać tagów [traffic_signals:direction=forward].
pavvv (2025-04-25 18:52:53+00:00): A po co one są na jednokierunkowej?
eggie (2025-04-24 20:55:38+00:00): Jan... Hier heb ik de routering hersteld en de paden en trap goedgelegd. Pad doorverbonden met Rubensstraat.
gr eggie
MxxCon (2025-04-26 04:29:02+00:00): Hello.
This edit has similar issues as the previous one..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165396541
RailandSea (2025-06-18 04:49:13+00:00): overwritten with decade old information

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167764017
Joseph R P (2025-05-22 18:56:08+00:00): Hello, service roads and driveways such as the road leading to the Indian Hills Apartments complex should not be tagged as primary links. The highway link tags are for unnamed roadways like exit ramps, slip lanes, or median crossovers. 
Additionally, the 'destination' value should only be used for destinations that are officially posted on signs, typically the roadside/overhead green signs. This is so that a GPS using OSM data could read, for example, 'follow the ramp to I 15 towards Las Vegas', and the end user can match the GPS directions with the real world signs. See here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination#Destination_of_roads
eggie (2025-04-24 20:52:32+00:00): Het werkt alleen als een paaltje verbonden is met de weg.
Een auto zal nooit over een fietspad routeren in osm.
Langlaeufer (2025-04-26 13:23:10+00:00): Hmm, am weg steht die description="Privatweg, Fußgänger und Radfahrer erlaubt". Du hast jetzt access=no eingtragen. Was stimmt nun und was ist deine Quelle?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165397006
mardiz (2025-04-26 14:15:37+00:00): Diesen Weg gibt es so nicht mehr da mitten in der abgeräumten Baustelle für die Heidekrautbahn. Der aktuelle Weg ist eingetragen am Rand der Baustelle.
(PS: OSM hakt bei mir häufig mit langen Ladezeiten, teilweise geht nix mehr. Server überlastet?
Langlaeufer (2025-04-26 16:37:59+00:00): Also kann die descripción weg. Und nur noch access no
mardiz (2025-04-26 17:34:17+00:00): Si senor
Langlaeufer (2025-04-26 17:37:59+00:00): Gracias
eggie (2025-04-24 20:45:51+00:00): Dag Jan....   Een paaltje 'moet' altijd een nodeverbinding hebben met het wegdeel.
Ook al rijd je er langs of tussendoor.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-24 20:48:19+00:00): Zo te zien heb je het fietspad gewoon geplakt op de onderliggende weg. Dat is helaas niet correct.
eggie (2025-04-24 20:50:41+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast en de onderliggende weg verwijderd.
gr eggie
TrickyFoxy (2026-02-16 09:59:00+00:00): А что это за третья церковь? https://osm.org/way/1380972152
avi32 (2026-02-16 12:17:28+00:00): Похоже, это вторая, которая заброшка. Геодезисты криво привязали на нспд. Но в целом странно, пьяный был, что-ли? https://panoramax.openstreetmap.fr/?background=streets&focus=pic&map=17.97/61.011389/36.193248&pic=9c1eb411-99ca-41cd-91cd-03b64a03d0bb&seq=3ce8e032-83c1-4b86-840b-946cece3d07e&speed=250&xyz=276.75/1.38/30
Baloo Uriza (2025-07-25 15:53:08+00:00): This is a free turn back to the street so people inadvertently turning into the driveway or rejected at the gate aren't stuck at the gate.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165397716
konstantink_lyft (2025-07-28 14:27:43+00:00): Hi, Baloo Uriza,

My name is Konstantin, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Yes, you’re absolutely right. Thank you very much for bringing the incorrect edits to our attention and for removing inappropriate access. I apologize for any inconvenience caused by my edits.

Best regards, Konstantin
NorthCrab_upload (2025-04-24 20:50:50+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12784551730

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
kvjk (2025-05-22 08:00:25+00:00): Jeste sigurni da je otvoren novi izlaz za odmorište Kvarner iz smjera Rijeke? 
Koliko ja znam izlazilo se kod same naplatne postaje kao što je prije bilo nacrtano.
Također i prema Pazinu se ulazilo kod naplatnih.
Dakle ovaj sjeverni dio čvora do rotora nije bio službeno u funkciji.
Moguće da je došlo do neke promjene nedavno. Lijep pozdrav
JaffaKetchup (2025-05-22 17:22:19+00:00): Hey kvjk, sorry my Croatian is quite limited!
I can't know for sure which entrances/exits are open.
I was mainly guessing that it is open, as the traffic from Rijeka must move to the new carriageway prior to the new toll booth - whether that is after or before the new junction, I'm not sure.
Additionally, I can see, I think, from media pictures and official diagrams, that the "return" road within the service area going West is at least paved/complete, so I would expect it to be open. Whether it is open or not, I'm not sure, but if it is open, that can only be to allow access toward Istra for traffic from Rijeka (again, where traffic from Rijeka accesses, I'm not sure).
Looking at https://i.imgur.com/KD1C147.jpeg, there is a sign located at the entrance to this West return road in the service area (PZ D07) which has a crossed out sign (which I'm guessing is currently in place) that indicates returning traffic is to use the return road. However, there is the no vehicular access sign with some text I cannot read, instead of "Pazin, Pula", as I would expect to see. So maybe that indicates that it's not open.
I'm more than happy for you to put access=no if you think it isn't open yet, unfortunately I can't be there, so I'm working from plans and media photos.
Thanks!
---
Hej kvjk, oprosti moj hrvatski je prilično ograničen!
Ne mogu sa sigurnošću znati koji su ulazi/izlazi otvoreni.
Uglavnom sam pretpostavljao da je otvoren, jer se promet iz Rijeke mora prebaciti na novi kolnik prije nove naplatne kućice - nisam siguran je li to poslije ili prije novog čvora.
Osim toga, vidim, mislim, iz medijskih slika i službenih dijagrama, da je "povratna" cesta unutar uslužnog područja koja ide na zapad barem asfaltirana/dovršena, tako da bih očekivao da bude otvorena. Je li otvoren ili ne, nisam siguran, ali ako je otvoren, to može biti samo da se omogući pristup prema Istri za promet iz Rijeke (opet, gdje ulazi promet iz Rijeke, nisam siguran).
Gledajući https://i.imgur.com/KD1C147.jpeg, postoji znak koji se nalazi na ulazu u ovu zapadnu povratnu cestu u servisnom području (PZ D07) s prekriženim znakom (za koji pretpostavljam da je trenutno na mjestu) koji označava da promet u povratku treba koristiti povratnu cestu. No, tu je znak zabrane za vozila s nekim tekstom koji ne mogu pročitati, umjesto "Pazin, Pula", kako bih očekivao. Pa možda to znači da nije otvoren.
Drago mi je što možete staviti access=no ako mislite da još nije otvoreno, nažalost ne mogu biti tamo, pa radim prema planovima i medijskim fotografijama.
Hvala!
kvjk (2025-05-23 12:43:30+00:00): No worries about Croatian. :)
I added back the access road before the toll booth. I added access=no to the northern part of the highway exit.

 This part of the exit was never open to traffic due to ongoing excavations nearby and alternating traffic and so on. I live nearby and I'll check the situation there again soon.

On the southern side, near the gas station it looks like there won't be any more construction of roads for now. So those might need to be "planned" instead of "in construction". There is no material deposited to construct the road on for now. I'll have a look also, haven't noticed any signs of that, but I also wasn't aware of these plans. It is not that important for now. Cheers
eggie (2025-04-24 21:02:39+00:00): Dag Maurice,

Wanneer een bedrijf stopt graag de adresnode intact laten.
Alleen bedrijfsinfo verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-04-24 21:03:48+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=165397835
Nummer 16 hersteld
Maurice1969 (2025-04-25 13:20:52+00:00): Ah sorry, ik was even in de veronderstelling dat ik die terug had gezet. Volgens mij zit de opticien van nummer 18 ook in nummer 16 maar dat is ook niet echt nuttige informatie. 

Dank je voor je hulp, leerzaam voor me!
Maurice1969 (2025-04-25 13:35:41+00:00): Eggie ik snap even niet waarom mijn wijzigingen niet zichtbaar zijn. Ik had een brievenbus en pakketautomaat geplaatst en bijvoorbeeld de Spare Rib Express toegevoegd op plaats van de DA Drogisterij, maar dat lijkt allemaal niet verwerkt?
eggie (2025-04-25 13:54:50+00:00): Paar keer ctrl f5 toetsen. Je cache leegmaken.
Dan rendert het wel.
Mapse
Maurice1969 (2025-04-25 16:39:53+00:00): Oh wacht ik zie het al, in de "bewerken" Modus is het wel aangepast, maar als ik niet ingelogd ben dus eigenlijk gewoon bezoeker van de site dan is het niet te zien. Worden die wijzigingen naderhand pas doorgevoerd?
Maurice1969 (2025-04-25 16:42:09+00:00): never mind nu doet hij het wel.
eggie (2025-04-25 16:52:30+00:00): Nee.. de cache van je browser zit je in de weg.
Het is je eigen scherm dat de oude situatie laat zien. Ctrl f5 leegt de cache
spughetti (2025-04-24 21:08:54+00:00): https://www.osm.org/changeset/164042099
yrtimiD (2025-04-25 01:05:56+00:00): Welcome and thanks for your contribution!

When you change highway type to "path" you define it as some generic road. On its own highway=path is not very helpful. in most cases this is at least highway=footway.

you can read more at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
Lezurex (2025-04-25 06:36:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1380981254
Wozu ist der nötig? Die sind ja ohnehin schon durch den highway=service verbunden.
Makeena (2025-04-25 13:24:07+00:00): Hier geht es um die Semantik: Der Serviceway führt auf die Hauptstrasse (also sinngemäss für Fahrzeuge), dabei hat er einen Fussgängerübergang für das Trottoir (also für die Querung der Strasse). Ein Fussgängerübergang ist aber im Allgemeinen kein Ort, wo man als Fussgänger zwischen Strasse und Trottoir wechselt, diese Möglichkeit wird durch den neuen Link explizit gegeben. Dadurch soll auch die korrekte Maschinenlesbarkeitverbessert werden. Wenn es stört, kann man den auch wieder entfernen.
Lezurex (2025-04-25 13:34:09+00:00): Verstehe ich nicht. Wenn zwei Ways einen geteilten Node haben, kann auch dazwischen gewechselt werden, egal, was auf dem Node getaggt ist. Ist das nicht der Fall, sollten sie keinen geteilten Node und entsprechende layer-Tags haben (wie bei Brücken und Tunneln).

Der zusätzliche Footway suggeriert einen vom highway=service abgetrennten, separaten Weg, was hier nicht der Fall ist. Solche Crossings gibts überall sonst auch und da ist kein zusätzlicher Footway nötig. Es ist schlicht falsch.
Makeena (2025-04-25 14:06:41+00:00): Korrektur kommt heute, habe noch ein paar andere Edits in der Nähe.
keepright! ler (2025-04-26 10:53:30+00:00): Do you mean that these directions are incorrect?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=51.452416%2C-0.982936%3B51.452738%2C-0.982094

If yes, this is expected behavior for OSRM and GraphHopper: “Fox Talbot Close” is tagged as private and ignored by these two routers for bicycle/foot routing. And “Epping Close” happens to be closer to the destination than “Baker Street”.

Valhalla does route the correct way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_foot&route=51.452416%2C-0.982936%3B51.452738%2C-0.982094#map=19/51.452771/-0.982559

You might consider changing “Fox Talbot Close” to access=destination (and also set access=destination on the gate), but ONLY if the public can enter for a visit.
byziden (2025-04-28 23:55:49+00:00): I'll try that yes, thanks.
byziden (2025-05-08 12:25:59+00:00): Thanks, that is working great as of right now. The only combination still wrong is OSRM + cycling. All the other combos are fine. Any suggestions on how to fix that one?
keepright! ler (2025-05-08 15:38:46+00:00): The OSRM debug map shows that Fox Talbot Close is missing from the bike routing graph:
https://map.project-osrm.org/debug/bike.html#19.36/51.45283/-0.98215

Maybe OSRM didn’t update the bicycle routing graph yet.

Maybe access=permissive is treated like access=private for bike routing. If that’s the case, it should be reported to the OSRM developers as that doesn’t make sense.
ilias_ (2025-05-01 01:27:50+00:00): Bienvenue dans la communauté!
user_5359 (2025-04-25 14:53:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/12784656039 (one of for objects with the key altura). I assume this is a tree.
    altura = 27 (means?)
    circumference = 1.30 (other have two values)
    deameter crowm = 11 (did you mean diameter_crown)
    name = Eucalipto (a tree with name? Did you mean species:es)

If your changes are part of a school programme, please inform the person in charge: Other trees on the school grounds have also been marked with names.

Please have also a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
aceman444 (2025-12-04 23:06:53+00:00): Zdravim, adresa uz bola na hlavnej budove gymnazia. Netreba ju duplikovat aj na tu malu budovu. Ak by mala rovnake supisne cislo (co podla katastra nema), tak sa daju spojit do jednej budovy (s roznymi castami) a mozu mat jednu adresu, nie dve duplicitne (a nekompletne). A prosim nepridavajte do PSC medzery.
ticho2 (2025-12-05 06:34:34+00:00): Zdravim, PSC bez medzier je nejaky oficialne spravny format, alebo len osobna preferencia? Pytam sa lebo tu v OSM aspon v Bratislave a okoli vidavam prevazne PSC s medzerou.

Osobne tam tu medzeru uprednostnujem, tak som bol nauceny, ale nie je to nejaka silna preferencia - len mi prijde trochu zvlastne na to upozornovat, ked je to tak bezne.
aceman444 (2025-12-09 00:19:55+00:00): Ked si vsimnete v Bratislave to hromadne zmenil jediny autor a este sme nemali tu chut to po nom vratit naspat. Ale dostaneme sa k tomu, kedze adresy generujeme aj automaticky z registra adries (bez medzier).
Diskutuje sa to opakovane na fore, napr. https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/jRf1VQWLDnc/m/E48cxyAPAgAJ .
ticho2 (2025-12-10 15:11:00+00:00): Ok, dobre vediet, budem to odteraz pisat bez medzery.
b-jazz (2025-04-25 05:09:11+00:00): RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1380987319

Hello Vurmilion. The lines that define fairways, greens, bunkers, water hazards, and tees should never intersect or partially overlap each other and we noticed that they are overlapping in one or more of the feature pairs in this changeset. If there is no obvious fringe around the green, the fairway should butt up against the green and every node between them should be *shared*. If there is a fringe around the green that is similar to the fairway, the fairway should extend around the green and the two objects should be merged together into a multipolygon (See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for how to create them with your map editor).  Please read the wiki for instructions and examples of how to better map golf courses: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls. If you have any questions, please reply here and I'll gladly help clarify things. Thanks!
yrtimiD (2025-04-25 01:13:53+00:00): almost, building=detached is a residential building, in this case it's more correct to use building=synagogue. 
osm wiki is your friend, it has almost all answers. and if not - feel free to ask community on forum or in telegram.
I'll fix it.
CurlingMan13 (2025-04-29 00:44:53+00:00): The Trader Joe's was already mapped about a month prior.  Please do not map features that already exist!
eggie (2025-04-25 05:14:22+00:00): Dag OuwroeTarzan,

De camping is geen 'stadspark'. 

De camping staat al op het vlak. Alle info is daar al voorhanden. Je hoort een camping geen lid te maken van de relatie Rotterdam Rijnmond.
Waar zou dat voor nodig zijn.
Het was hier al correct gemapt. Wat is je bedoeling?

Reverted by changeset #165405593

MVG
eggie
Ian Staines (2025-04-24 22:06:22+00:00): Also removed barriers (blocks) that were put in place during covid.  These are no longer in place.
5m4u9 (2025-04-26 04:56:58+00:00): Esa etiqueta is_in ya no va, en su lugar proponen addr: que tiene soporte en buscadores y tiene más sentido y ampliamente usado.
Langlaeufer (2025-04-25 12:52:26+00:00): Bitte keine highway=crossing auf Ausfahrten (service) über den Gehweg/Bordstein setzen - weil hier haben Fußgänger Vorgang.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165399880
arcanma (2025-04-25 15:45:50+00:00): Salve Filippo, benvenuto nella comunità e grazie dei tuoi contributi.
Hai chiesto la revisione del tuo inserimento per cui ti do alcuni consigli. Ho visto le foto del link che hai messo, da quanto vedo è un percorso ciclopedonale, quindi va specificato che è percorribile anche a piedi. Non so se hai seguito l'etichettatura del tratto già presente, inserito da poco, ma se ha le stesse caratteristiche anche quello andrebbe corretto, per informazioni sulle etichette da inserire guarda https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway=cycleway?uselang=it.
Altra indicazione è riguardo al percorso lungo le strade, in vari punti hai sovrapposto la traccia della ciclopedonale al percorso della strada, se la ciclopedonale è separata dalla carreggiata della strada la sua traccia deve essere mantenuta separata, se invece termina va interrotta al punto di innesto, se invece c'è una corsia ciclabile marcata sulla carreggiata stessa va interrota ma alla strada va aggiunta l'etichetta cycleway=lane
jcarlson (2025-04-29 16:21:18+00:00): you extended roads here, but left the noexit=yes tags on nodes further north. also the new streets you drew crossed without intersecting. disconnected streets can't be routed properly. i already fixed it!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165400591
A-Rth-Urp-Hil-Ipdenu (2025-04-30 20:23:04+00:00): Have since added sources for PRoW data
felipeeugenio (2025-04-25 12:54:46+00:00): Hola Camilo. Ok con el cambio de nombre. pero el nombre cambió? o estaba malo?
Para dejar el antiguo como old_name

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165400708
Filip009 (2025-04-27 09:05:27+00:00): Super úpravy, len tak ďalej :)
MxxCon (2025-04-26 04:38:10+00:00): C-Town accepts crypto?🤨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165401224
aharvey (2025-04-28 00:54:31+00:00): What's the iD editor issue?
aharvey (2025-04-28 00:55:57+00:00): Oh looks like from the note that it's deleting a way which is a member of a relation.
jcarlson (2025-04-29 15:50:29+00:00): make sure your sidewalks stop at the pavement. the portion in the road would be highway=footway + footway=crossing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165401320
TheSwavu (2025-04-25 00:35:54+00:00): This is not a boundary. We do not tag things in OSM so that they will appear in Wikipedia. If Wikipedia cannot cope with a collection relation then that is a problem with Wikipedia. If you want to tag this as a boundary then open a topic in the US category on the OSM Community forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/us/78 and make your case.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165401791
TheSwavu (2025-04-25 23:38:29+00:00): This is the issue that needs to be fixed https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T326560
Comino (2025-04-25 00:53:56+00:00): Why did you add XMR-tags? Spar does not accept Monero, Bitcoin-only.

https://cryptobriefing.com/spar-bitcoin-payments-switzerland/
Flap Slimy Outward (2025-04-25 06:32:31+00:00): Hello. Why did you remove the English transactions of the roads? The names are in Spanish. Thank you.
Allison P (2025-04-25 08:28:57+00:00): The road is not actually called that. If I phone 911 and give my address as Inspired Way, the police will come up short. This name is used nowhere.
aharvey (2025-04-28 00:58:06+00:00): I had mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12617115483 but you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12784980716 which is very close, I suspect it's a duplicate as unlikely there would be two crossings so close, I'll merge the two together.
aharvey (2025-04-28 00:58:57+00:00): and thanks for fixing the brownfield area I added, I just saw the houses demolished, but I didn't realise it was for the park expansion https://www.krg.nsw.gov.au/Planning-and-development/Projects-and-current-works/St-Ives/Bedes-Forest-expansion-and-improvements

If it's not yet built, this section could be a landuse=construction
ArchangelEkim (2025-04-28 01:00:48+00:00): Yeah I am adding that construction zone now.
aharvey (2025-04-28 01:20:03+00:00): Thanks.
Regarding https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/224362496 where you changed the operator:wikidata I don't understand that. Is the operator not NSW Department of Education? https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5260271 ?
ArchangelEkim (2025-04-28 01:25:14+00:00): OSM was pushing an issue with it when I reviewed it, I don't why it switched to that.
aharvey (2025-04-28 01:30:35+00:00): No worries, I've fixed that. iD was warning about outdated operator:type syntax.
小原酱 (2026-07-22 07:07:19+00:00): 你好，小区内的道路应为服务道路或居民区道路，在中国没有生活性道路
小原酱 (2026-07-22 07:12:39+00:00): 建筑物房屋可以使用 公寓建筑 或 住宅建筑 居民区应为 整个 小区 公寓 的范围，不是建筑物要素，不应用于房屋
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-12 18:44:15+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12784971388/history has rooms = 0 that was added in this edit
What was meant by this? That this object has no rooms? Seems surprising here
aharvey (2025-04-28 01:46:40+00:00): In the case of https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/11568757353 the operator:wikidata value was correct, so in iD selecting "Tag not the same" is incorrect. You can either ignore the warning or opt to upgrade the tags to update the operator tag from "TfNSW" to "Transport for NSW".
ArchangelEkim (2025-04-28 01:49:27+00:00): Thanks, Yes that I was meant to do, but misclicked. Apologies.
Kovoschiz (2025-04-25 03:48:56+00:00): Please be careful when moving. There's a dragged point.
AntiCompositeNumber (2025-04-25 03:06:05+00:00): I meant alt_name, not website.
MxxCon (2025-11-28 20:58:02+00:00): Hello.
Node 10955917472 seem to have some corrupted tag values. Please take a look at that.
GullibleMappazo (2026-03-11 04:59:23+00:00): i finally fixed that node
MxxCon (2026-03-11 05:02:36+00:00): Thank you.☺️
Better late than never, but late is not that great😉
Jonathan Delaney (2026-04-13 18:28:36+00:00): I'm not seeing the Spring Grove bike lanes mapped separately. It appears to have been tagged correctly before. Am I misunderstanding something?
bandit41073 (2026-04-13 18:36:52+00:00): I think what happened here was that either the sidewalk used to be mapped as a cycleway, or it had something to do with the bike lane on the road. This has been a long time now.
Jonathan Delaney (2026-04-14 18:08:42+00:00): Weird stuff happens. Thanks for fixing it!
lunar_jaws812 (2025-04-25 03:57:02+00:00): Website should be https://theraymond1886.com/