piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2023-08-08 21:16:20+00:00): Ik heb de oneway= regels en uitzondering fietsers  verwijderd.
catonano (2023-08-09 06:18:48+00:00): why aren't these points of interest not appearing on the map ?
ivanbranco (2023-08-09 07:08:27+00:00): Try deleting your browser's cache. Also notice that some kind of shops are not rendered at all in Carto, such as craft=photographer I guess.
rskedgell (2023-08-08 18:51:29+00:00): That's a lot of deleted objects to be covered by a meaningless changeset comment. What are you trying to do here?
BillyG1956 (2023-08-08 22:15:46+00:00): remapping the golf course deleting irrelevant and or inaccurate details. Work in progress please be patient
rskedgell (2023-08-08 23:12:29+00:00): Thanks for the clarification. One of those cases where it's easier to re-start from scratch?
SomeoneElse (2023-08-14 09:23:28+00:00): Unfortunately, these edits have completely broken lots of other features such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11271488/history , https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4035125 etc.  As the mapper here has left this course entirely now - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.62132/0.14164&layers=D - I'll revert these.
As a general rule of thumb it is NOT OK to delete everything and remap.  Details from the previous mapping will be inevitably lost, and history is also lost.
SomeoneElse (2023-08-14 11:33:41+00:00): OK, the area around this course is now reverted and the LDPs etc. are complete again.  To see the old data, use https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1yTD .  It seems that the main thing missing now are "hole" ways such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1196053626 .  These can easily be undeleted or just remapped (there are only 18 of them!).
Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask!
Manuel H (2023-08-27 12:28:02+00:00): Bei "name" von Hydranten nichts eintragen. Nicht "nicht sicher" wie bei 11099943946. Es sei denn, der Hydrant hat wirklich einen Namen, was eigentlich nie der Fall sein dürfte.
Ungenauigkeiten als 'note' einfügen, wenn nötig, nicht als fixme. Irgendwie ist alles mehr oder weniger genau. Niemand wird wegen eines fixmes losgehen und einen Hydranten suchen.
BlueButterfly (2023-08-08 18:47:25+00:00): Correction: Source used was Mapbox Satellite
BCNorwich (2023-08-10 09:11:45+00:00): Duplicate highway removed.
user_3716049 (2023-08-19 13:23:32+00:00): Hi Waldhans,
der Weg ist ausschließlich als Radweg beschildert (siehe unten verlinkte Fotos) und ausserdem ist er ab höhe Eichenstraße ein Teil der Straße kein abgetrennter Weg.
Ab da meines erachtens deshalb wie folgt einzutragen.

cycleway=lane + cycleway:lane=exclusive
oneway:bicycle=no 

https://pic.infini.fr/gXQbSkuT/OG2m4qSG.JPG

https://pic.infini.fr/yHalKlS5/spXoilZH.JPG

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycleway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:lane
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:cycleway%3Dopposite_lane

Beste Grüße Kelso
waldhans (2023-08-19 17:56:30+00:00): Hi Kelso,
dann tausche es aus. Pass nur auf, das das bicycle-routing und die Relation heil bleibt.
mfg Kurt
waldhans (2023-08-19 18:40:12+00:00): Und bitte überprüfe nach deinen Änderungen die Routing-Fähigkeit. Insbesondere bei den Offline-Routern OSsmAnd und Brouter.
Wir haben nichts von exotischen Tagging-Schemen, die nachher mit dem Fahrrad nicht befahren werden dürfen. 
Der jetzige Zustand passt sowohl zu allen Routern und sieht in der Karte auch passabel aus. Diese zwei Ziele müsstest du halt auch erreichen.
user_3716049 (2023-08-20 08:24:18+00:00): Hi Kurt,
Warum exotisches Tagging ? Das ist doch das was laut Wiki, für die örtlichen gegebenheiten vorgesehen ist. Wenn die Router das nicht richtig verarbeiten können, machen die doch was falsch. 
Sorry aber ich sehe meine Aufgabe nicht darin nach jeder Wiki komformen  Anpssung zu überprüfen ob alle Router das auch richtig auswerten. Obwohl ich natürlich auch will das das funktioniert. Aber wenn du die Erfahrung gemacht hast das, das trotz Wiki konformen Tagging das Routing nicht funktioniert, solltest du dich an die wenn die das falsch Programmiert haben.

Mfg Kelso
waldhans (2023-08-21 12:00:45+00:00): Super. Du hast damit klar ausgedrückt, dass du mappst, was du willst. Und für die eventuellen Schäden sind die "Anderen" verantwortlich.  Also Freie Fahrt für dich, mache, was du willst.
user_3716049 (2023-08-21 18:06:12+00:00): Lustig, du bist derjenige der sich nicht ans Wiki gehalten hat und statt dessen so getaggt hat das irgendwelche Router, ein von dir erwünschtes ergebnis liefern. 
Wie wärs wenn du mal konstruktive Vorschläge für ein Wiki konformes Tagging anbieten würdest, die ein möglicherweise bestehendes Routing Problem lösen.
Wenn mir alles egal wäre hätte ich dein "Pfusch" einfach überarbeitet anstatt ihn zu kommentiren und mich von dir beleidigen zu lassen.
Bitte melde dich erst wieder wenn du ins Wiki geschaut hast, die entsprenden Links habe ich ja schon meinen ersten Kommentar angefügt, die scheinst du allerdings aus überhebllichkeit leider ignoriert zu haben.
gurglypipe (2023-08-08 18:59:38+00:00): Hi. foot=designated implies foot=yes, so you shouldn’t need to change those tags.

If your navigation software doesn’t understand foot=designated then it needs to be fixed/updated.
Frans S (2023-08-09 08:34:27+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139627228
BCNorwich (2023-08-10 09:15:54+00:00): Is it really a highway, (unconnected to the highway network), or is it a building?
BCNorwich (2023-08-20 05:41:27+00:00): No response so amended to building.
MxxCon (2023-08-08 23:49:13+00:00): Hello.
When mapping features that supposed to have right angles, such as these swimming pools, or buildings, you can right click on that feature and select "Make Square" (shortcut key Q) to straighten it out. That makes your mapping look neater and closer to the real world shape. 👍🙂
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139627494
eggie (2023-08-08 21:10:25+00:00): Hoi laoban... Er is hier zoveel aan de paden gesleuteld dat er een gat zit in de wandelroute Dwars door Gelderland.
Weet jij hoe die loopt en of ie sowieso nog bestaat als aangegeven route? 
Hij wijkt van het noorden af van het Pieterpad, maar verderop volgt hij het Pieterpad weer.
Zie https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=1777960&map=15.0/51.9172/6.2492

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-08 21:12:13+00:00): 'k Denk dat ik 'm voor nu even omleid via het Pieterpad.. Het geeft anders alleen maar foutmeldingen. Mocht je meer weten houd ik mij aanbevolen.
Groet
eggie
Laoban88 (2023-08-09 08:15:15+00:00): Ik heb dus blijkbaar weer iets fout gedaan. Zou jij het kunnen reverten? ik heb die plugin niet.
eggie (2023-08-09 08:37:35+00:00): Hoi...  Nee. niet nodig.. Het is oude hardnekkige rendering denk ik. 
Op sommige zoomniveaus is het nog wit. 
Er zitten nu geen fouten in de mp's.

Dus gewoon doormappen.
Die routes zijn wellicht ook onderbroken omdat er paden zijn verwijderd. De route loopt nu via het intacte Pieterpad. 
Groet
eggie
MxxCon (2023-08-08 23:54:24+00:00): Hello.
I believe you made a mistake the way you tagged rowhouses.
building=terrace is intended if the whole section of them is mapped as a single feature.
If each one is mapped separately they should be  "building=house"+"house=terraced".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139627951
MapSpot (2023-08-09 01:18:04+00:00): Ah, thanks for catching that. I'll tag that way moving forward (and run a query to fix the instances from this set).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139627951
Endres Pelka (2023-11-24 15:57:01+00:00): Na co tyle podwójnych linii w ciągu ulicy Aleksandra Fredry? Poprawiam to
uprkos (2023-11-24 16:06:34+00:00): Ja tam tylko poprawiałem relacje autobusowe, nie zmieniałem istniejących tagów samej drogi. Tak że spokojnie poprawiaj cokolwiek jest źle.
Endres Pelka (2023-11-24 16:17:49+00:00): OK, to wygląda na jakiś bug w tym nowym narzędziu "Relatify"... Poprawiłem co się dało w 144414206. Dzięki za bezzwłoczną odpowiedź :)
mötteli (2023-09-20 09:54:36+00:00): Thank you for mapping this parking lot!

For routing it would be helpful to have a highway=service that leads here, and if you feel fancy you could also map the parking aisles with highway=service + service=parking_aisle.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice .
cserpell (2023-08-09 22:38:33+00:00): I think these houses are not part of a private condominium
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139628589
map per (2023-08-10 14:43:25+00:00): Hallo SebastianRömer,

wegen review_requested: Wie sieht es denn dort vor Ort aus? Steht an der Tür etwas?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
catonano (2023-08-09 06:20:21+00:00): this bike shop doesn't exist anymore

I tried to remove it but it still appears on the map
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:04:25+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012746
dknelson9876 (2024-09-06 00:44:15+00:00): Sorry to bother you again so soon, and on an old changeset, but I didn't notice some of these upgrades til now, and I take significant issue with some of them. Specifically, Lehman Avenue near West Valley Central, the unnamed road connecting parking lots at Valley Fair Mall, 1950 W near the drive in theater, 1175 W near Fore Lakes Golf Course, Vine St west of Murray Blvd and the connecting Glendon St, Anderson Ave near Viewmont Elementary, and 3720 West (and maybe Gold Medal Drive) near Jordan Landing. None of these are really significant connector or collector roads in my experience
Oregonian3 (2024-09-06 02:01:44+00:00): Eh, I think the bar for tertiary should be pretty low. That's the point of having the four main classification levels :) it allows the more important local roads such as these to be classified as more important than the surrounding purely residential streets. 

I like to classify by a mix of function and form. By function I mean do the roads serve a useful connection in the road network or high traffic volumes. By form I mean do the roads actually support carrying a high volume of traffic or appear as more major roads.

To take an example of yours, Vine Street west of Murray Boulevard is clearly more important than the surrounding residential streets, as it provides access from the main roads into the neighborhood and serves as one of the two main routes to the elementary school there. In addition, it is striped with a middle line and is clearly wider/meant to serve more traffic than the surrounding neighborhood streets. On the balance of those two criteria, I'd consider it tertiary.

Side note, I'd also consider Murray Blvd in this area as a pretty clear secondary road, as it provides an important N/S connection in this area that generally lacks good N/S routes and is more important than all the surrounding tertiary roads. I know it used to be tertiary but it looks like someone downgraded it recently (including to unclassified north of 4500 for some reason; a classification that doesn't make any sense at all given the road's form and function).
dknelson9876 (2024-09-16 05:46:59+00:00): After chatting with some other local mappers, this isn't the first time this has happened, so I've started a new wiki page for the county. The only factor you mentioned I didn't include is traffic volumes, which I can fetch if you think they'll help your case. Please look it over and let me know what you think https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Dknelson9876/Salt_Lake_County_Road_Classifications
Oregonian3 (2024-09-16 13:25:37+00:00): Love this idea; I think the wiki is an underutilized resource. My free time has been a bit limited lately, but I'll contribute to your new page when I can.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:04:22+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012745
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:04:18+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012742
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:04:11+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012740
gscholz (2023-08-12 08:18:56+00:00): Hi mapitero,
your recent changeset have left behind several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-40.48861&lat=-6.65585&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software and not connected ways are not usable anyways. Can you please fix this?

Kind regards
Guido
mapitero (2023-08-24 17:44:49+00:00): Hi Guido,

Thank you very much for your reminder! Fixed a couple of days ago the pointed errors.

Best, 
Matheus
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:04:06+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012738
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:04:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012735
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:04:01+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012734
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:03:58+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012732
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:03:53+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012728
user_177389 (2023-08-08 21:18:07+00:00): You broke a lot of relations again!
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:03:51+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012727
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:03:46+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012724
burrscurr (2023-08-13 10:49:46+00:00): Beim Entfernen der doppelt erfassten Bahnsteige habe ich nicht geprüft, ob die in routen-Relationen enthalten waren. So sind Bahnsteigkanten mit role=platform in den Relationen gelandet. In changeset/139818247 habe ich das korrigiert.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:03:44+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012722
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:03:41+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012721
burrscurr (2023-08-08 21:56:59+00:00): gemeint: public_transport=platform
burrscurr (2023-08-08 21:57:12+00:00): gemeint: public_transport=platform
user_5359 (2023-08-09 07:25:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: A name is a name not a description. Please take a look to https//:wiki.osm.org for better description of your camping place (?)
Frans S (2023-08-09 08:33:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139630540
VictorIE (2023-08-25 23:08:02+00:00): Hi,

Several post depots here.

Cold Move Logistics Solutions sounds more like cold storage and bulk deliveries than somewhere that sorts individual packages.
Coirib (2023-08-26 11:32:12+00:00): Yea i was a bit unsure about the tagging when adding these. 

Maybe building=warehouse with a node that has office=courier or office=logistics and the rest of the tags is more appropriate. Thoughts?
VictorIE (2023-08-26 12:03:22+00:00): I'd have no problem calling a courier depot a post_depot. But if it is just a generic transport company that transports large loads (which may included part loads), then I would call it a warehouse (maybe with office=*)
Coirib (2023-08-26 12:24:35+00:00): Yea sounds good, I'll go through and change them now.
Frans S (2023-08-09 08:32:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139630714
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:56:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714006, 143714008 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines benutzers nach selbstlöschung
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:03:34+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012718
Fizzie-DWG (2024-01-08 03:03:27+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146012716
user_5359 (2023-08-09 06:51:13+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/way/984764787 (one of five ways). What is the mean of the tag false=D ?
user_5359 (2023-08-09 16:27:36+00:00): I have also freed the other four ways from the faulty tag.
user_177389 (2023-08-08 21:21:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200998362 is not an administrative boundary!
SomeoneElse (2023-08-09 19:22:26+00:00): Whilst I'm sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193713749/history wasn't named "farm" (to be fair, it was that user's first ever edit), please do have a look at the underlying data.  The square building here does not match the imagery, and the farmyard is as yet unmapped.
VLD302 (2023-08-10 16:39:50+00:00): Hello SomeoneElse,

Thank you for reaching out to me about this issue. I have gone ahead and made a geometry edit on the building feature to be more aligned with the imagery. I apologize for overlooking this and thank you again for bringing this to my attention. If you have anymore questions, comments, or concerns, please feel free to reach out to me! Thank you!
SomeoneElse (2023-08-13 15:45:17+00:00): Thanks VLD302.  Are there any other edits that you have made that might be similar?
VLD302 (2023-08-25 18:21:56+00:00): Hello SomeoneElse,

I have gone through my edits and I don't seem to see any that are similar to this one. Thanks again for reaching out!
BTC4Ever (2023-08-08 21:26:18+00:00): https://twitter.com/bitcoin_hotel/status/1688890113630121984
eggie (2023-08-08 21:40:48+00:00): Commentaar moest zijn .. Wegen uitgelijnd mbv PDOK 2023 latest
BlueButterfly (2023-08-08 21:45:48+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery
emersonveenstra (2023-08-10 15:29:05+00:00): Hi,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10140719/history you seem to have added "building=S". Could you please fix that? Thanks!
gscholz (2023-08-10 06:55:05+00:00): Hi Tom,
your recent edits have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=4.38832&lat=50.92484&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Tom Ameye (2023-10-21 16:36:10+00:00): Hi Guido,
When I click right now on the link, I don't see any "errors". Hope things have been resolved in the mean time. When you sent your comment 2 months ago I did try to correct some of those.
Best regards,
Tom
gscholz (2023-10-22 07:39:29+00:00): Hi Tom,
thanks for your response.
Guido
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-09 06:29:20+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Shop%3Dtortilla - would adding https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:NCI_flour_tortillas.jpg example image to the proposal be a good idea ?

Or are they selling them in shop=tortilla with a fillings, ready to eat, like https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tortilla_med_oksek%C3%B8d,_salsa,_r%C3%B8dl%C3%B8g,_tomat_og_avocado_(4543933652).jpg ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-09 06:29:37+00:00): And thanks for help with reported issues!
CENTSOARER (2023-08-10 18:41:40+00:00): Yes, please, feel free to update the proposal if you are allowed. If you can't I'll put it on the waiting list to update the proposal with flour tortillas image or wiki page later.

They sell tortillas as a staple food, not filled. Filled tortillas would be probably tacos, hence, a fast food/restaurant amenity with cuisine=tacos (it's been increasingly de facto used).

And, don't worry. I'll take the notes in Mexico one at a time until there are no more of them at least for one brief moment. It was crazy to realize yesterday that I've closed almost 4,000 already.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-03 05:51:28+00:00): added image to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Shop%3Dtortilla
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:56:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714006, 143714008 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines benutzers nach selbstlöschung
bxl-forever (2023-08-08 23:46:57+00:00): Hello,

Can I invite you to add real titles to your changesets on OSM.  Adding "Informatie verbetering" on every of them is just wasting other mappers’ time because we have to spend a lot of time every time trying to figure out what you have been wanting to do.

There seems to be a problem with this shape, which you broke in a previous changeset, I don’t see what kind of improvements you have been doing. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947788394
You even created a multipolygon to join the two broken parts instead of restoring the area.  It looks like a mistake, can you please have a look.

As for Oud Stadhuis, do you think the small part in front of the building, with the stairs, is really part of the building?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/951489558
Or should that be a separate shape?  I think government database treats them (and numbers them) separately.  Anyway, if you are applying a new policy or if you have good reasons to do so, this is something worth including in the changeset title.

Have a nice day.
bxl-forever (2023-08-08 23:38:48+00:00): Hello,

I am afraid we have a problem here.

When you add "access=yes" on an highway=* object, it makes it open to *every* vehicle.

Combining "highway=footway" + "access=yes" tells routing engines that everyone (cars, horses…) is welcome here.  Please do not add "access=yes".

Do not add "foot=yes" either, it is not necessary when the way is already tagged as a footway.  (foot=yes will be only used to counteract a generic ban, such as "access=no", or to allow pedestrians on a road where they would not be allowed by default, e.g "highway=cycleway")

Just keep highway=footway without anything else and that will be fine. ;-)

(Don’t let the crappy drop-down boxes in the iD editor fool you into selecting values there, just ignore that and go straight to the tags.)
maraf24 (2023-08-11 19:44:07+00:00): Why did you split road into seperate footway and cycleway?
Your comment and source don't have any information about that.
BaghdadiMapper (2023-08-08 22:26:41+00:00): .gov.krd link: http://archive.gov.krd/dfr/dfr.gov.krd/p/p9728.html
Enock4seth (2023-08-26 20:50:28+00:00): Mapping building like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1196165886 can be improved by using the "building_tools" plugin in JOSM or pressing Q after tracing, you can read more at https://learnosm.org/en/josm/josm-more-plugins/