piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
WoSoe (2024-05-31 15:23:46+00:00): Keep the history:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Danke
WoSoe
wermak (2024-05-31 21:00:16+00:00): Bestimmt nicht bei Stromleitungen.
Lelio Alves (2024-05-31 01:50:47+00:00): Good Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152059046
Lelio Alves (2024-05-31 01:50:13+00:00): Good Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152059056
Frans S (2024-05-31 08:17:53+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. However, Buildings often not squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152059123
Lelio Alves (2024-05-31 02:03:53+00:00): Good Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152059137
Lelio Alves (2024-05-31 02:02:57+00:00): Good Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152059140
ODULANA OLUWATOYIN (2025-01-30 14:22:40+00:00): Thank you
Lelio Alves (2024-05-31 01:59:27+00:00): Good Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152059143
JesseFTW (2024-05-31 13:06:44+00:00): Thanks for adding these!
tastrax (2024-05-31 06:32:51+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features 

To get the + symbol on a mobile device numeric keypad you may need to do a LONG press on the zero.
I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
tastrax (2024-05-31 06:33:56+00:00): PS - Welcome to OSM! just realised its your first edit!
Audrey_Dritte (2024-05-31 13:15:17+00:00): TYSM! I couldn't figure out how to get the +; I'll try that method in future.
Lelio Alves (2024-05-31 02:18:09+00:00): Good Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152059367
syntex (2024-06-12 20:31:40+00:00): To nie jest prawidłowy znacznik dla takich parkingów. To powinny być zwykłe street_side https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:parking%3Dlayby
KiloThree (2024-05-31 04:04:56+00:00): The bike lanes in this area are not physically separated from the road surface, so I believe the convention is to map them as tags on the road. Given `highway=cycleway` indicates a separate way for the use of cyclists, and these ways don't record that that a lot of this is either unprotected or parking protected lane, this feels like it's not descriptive of what's on the ground?
SomeoneElse (2026-04-12 16:30:31+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12144623 still a thing?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48778174 seems to be closed.
MacLondon (2026-04-13 21:31:59+00:00): Ah, I hadn't spotted that. I've changed the route relation to "disused".

https://www.thurrock.gov.uk/ferry-services/tilbury-to-gravesend mentions theat it "will not operate until further notice" so it might potentially reopen in the future.
miluethi (2024-06-01 19:26:05+00:00): Hi Anaroo,

please stop adding crazy shapes to OSM
miluethi (2024-06-01 19:29:09+00:00): Elyhden,

I'm removing all your contributions to OSM. These building shapes don't match at all the areal imagery and are considered vandalism.

Please stop contributing to OSM if you don't like it.
AkuAnakTimur (2024-05-31 03:09:11+00:00): https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=6.405158~100.226273&lvl=17&dir=72.897&style=x&v=2&sV=1 (2019)

https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=6.404983~100.226344&lvl=17&dir=73.171&style=x&v=2&sV=1 (2017)
Supaplex (2024-05-31 08:49:31+00:00): Hi

Is there any change of control of Antelope Reef, from China to Vietnam?

If not, you should not remove the name of this place.
FYI
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152060288
Supaplex (2024-05-31 08:48:45+00:00): Hi

Is there any change of control of Drummond Island from China to Vietnam?

If not, you should not remove the name of this place.
FYI
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152060350
Supaplex (2024-05-31 08:47:36+00:00): Hi 

Is there any change of control of Drummond Island from China to Vietnam?

If not, you should not remove the name of this place.
FYI
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152060362
Supaplex (2024-05-31 08:46:36+00:00): Hi 

Is there any change of control of Chenhang Island from China to Vietnam?

If not, you should not remove the name of this place.
FYI
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputed_territories
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152060389
MxxCon (2024-05-31 06:21:31+00:00): Hello.
Please note that when you enter building height, if you don't specify the units, it's assumed to be meters. This building is 110 feet, not 110 meters. That's a huge difference. :)

Additionally, when entering street names, they should be fully spelled out. Don't abbreviate Avenue into "Ave".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152060403
baconeggcheesepineapple (2024-05-31 12:33:16+00:00): Noted. Thanks for writing this explanation, and correcting my edit!
eggie (2024-06-02 14:13:55+00:00): Beste RodeJong   Het is de bedoeling dat de kaart nog routeert.
De voorsorteerstroken zitten allemaal al in het wegdeel. Bv Stappegoorweg!
Maar je maat er iets van dat niet conform de consensus is binnen OSM Nederland.
Je edits 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152058796
MVG
eggie
MxxCon (2024-05-31 06:33:26+00:00): Hello.
Your edit contains a number of significant problems and they must be corrected otherwise this edit will be fully reverted.
For no apparent reason you deleted a bunch of tags from a Starbucks in Chicago.
In almost every single entry you provided a malformed phone number. Phone numbers MUST always include a country dialing code (in US it's +1) and numbers must be separated only by - or space. They must not contain ( or ) symbols. It is documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage
When you add feature names they should be fully spelled out, not be abbreviated. "RCFL" must be expanded into its full meaning. If you want to add "RCFL" name you can also add short_name= tag, but name= tag must be corrected regardless. You can read more about this on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations

In Texas you deleted building=yes tag for no apparent reason.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152060689
user_21609801 (2024-05-31 18:09:04+00:00): I made this map for my own reference, but didn’t realize it would be publicly accessible until after I was done. I’ll just let the changes be reverted.
MxxCon (2024-06-01 19:13:36+00:00): Alright, this changeset has been reverted.👍
mikimapbuilder (2024-05-31 06:54:39+00:00): Based on satellite imagery this doesn't seem like residential road, that is the reason for change.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-31 12:21:22+00:00): Hola Andrés. Por favor tomar contato con la comunidad. Te hemos escrito tanto en changesets como mails privados. No puedes tener un grupo de gente corrigiendo las cosas que haces.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152060891
literan (2024-06-02 20:29:24+00:00): это здание снесено. Вы что, не видите тег was:building=sports_centre??

не надо отрисовывать уже снесенные здания
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 06:16:08+00:00): Hi thousand-desktop, welcome to OSM!

I guess something went wrong with your name of the following new map element, correct?

https://osm.org/node/11946810917
thousand-desktop (2024-05-31 16:22:15+00:00): Yeah, I wasn’t sure how to tag it and I didn’t notice that it isn’t showing up on the map anymore. For reference, it looks like this: https://images.fineartamerica.com/images/artworkimages/mediumlarge/1/fat-lady-squeeze-david-arment.jpg. Do you have any suggestions?
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-01 06:59:00+00:00): Thanks for your answer.

I was primarily concerned with the name, whether it is really correct.
thousand-desktop (2024-06-01 18:51:45+00:00): I believe the name is correct, here’s the previous iteration of this POI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10979672329/history/1.
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-01 19:32:27+00:00): Ah ok, thanks!

#HappyMapping
Caleb NHVR (2024-05-31 05:13:07+00:00): Incorrectly removed in Changeset: 152061915
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-31 07:49:26+00:00): Do not partially overlap areas.  Please review this webpage before making further edits!  ::

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152062192
Intrinsical (2024-06-02 21:17:26+00:00): I should have been more clear in my changeset's (151467946) comment, and specified that I left them untagged on purpose, until I could get more confirmation that they really existed.
Honey Fombuena (2024-06-06 15:44:18+00:00): Hi Maisha, please kindly correct the capitalization on the name. If this is how the name is really spelled, then please ignore this message. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152063151
mikko_tamura (2024-06-13 14:03:47+00:00): You should have moved the POI instead of deleting and adding a new one. You may also add the additional information and tags from the previous one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152063515
mikko_tamura (2024-06-13 14:05:44+00:00): please avoid using ALL CAPS for names
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152063978
Jordi MF (2024-05-31 07:59:57+00:00): ¿Cuál es tu fuente de información para afirmar que está ligar también se llama "Los Planetas del Chorrador"? Los topónimos son nombres propios y, especialmente los topónimos menores, no se traducen. "els Planets del Xorador" no tienen traducción.
Jordi MF (2024-05-31 08:02:23+00:00): Por último, el Xorrador no es ningún monte. Es una partida.
literan (2024-09-25 06:18:06+00:00): зачем вы на Калужской площади (Москва) нарисовали выдуманный мост? это фейк, там нет никакого моста.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-31 06:50:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2588915403
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979348572

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 07:11:17+00:00): Hi ZOZOZOZOqsetgfqesg, welcome to OSM!

I guess something went wrong with your name of the following new map element, correct?

https://osm.org/node/5445373758
Langlaeufer (2024-05-31 12:52:30+00:00): Mit den von dir angegebenen access werten handelt sich sich um einen Mehrzweckweg und keinen Fußweg

einfach highway=path, - foot, bicycle und horse ist dann per default bereits yes
gpserror (2024-06-04 02:42:17+00:00): Hey, you deleted Fort Collins.  Reverting.
arjunaraoc (2024-06-03 10:10:57+00:00): You have removed wikidata tags for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5556151706#map=17/18.40087/83.39362 .  If you are not aware of wikidata, do not disturb existing tags.  Please explain the source of your edits, with detailed comments  as you can  not identify bus stops from Esri world imagery.
arjunaraoc (2024-06-03 10:39:04+00:00): I have cleaned up Datti and Dattirajeru and updated their wikitags.  While editing if you have any doubts, please initiate a discussion on changeset or discuss it in OSM Andhra Pradesh (https://web.telegram.org/k/#@osmandhra ) channel. Thanks.
Reza_99 (2024-05-31 06:54:15+00:00): https://stockshopland.ir/
4004 (2024-06-01 22:29:01+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку. 
по соглашению (аналогичному российскому) статусная часть идет после прилагательного https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
scott_parker (2024-06-02 11:29:15+00:00): то есть правка не правильная, и правильно будет советская улица?

объясню с какой целью была попытка внести эту правку. дело в том, что по запросу жодино, советская не находит эту улицу https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/search?format=json&q=%D0%96%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%2C+%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F&polygon_geojson=1

тогда как по запросу Жодино, Советская улица результат получен https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/search?format=json&q=%D0%96%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%2C+%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%20%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0&polygon_geojson=1

вот была попытка как-то исправить эту ситуацию)
4004 (2024-06-02 13:17:15+00:00): да, я откатил на Советскую улицу.
сразу оговорюсь, что номинатим часто работает довольно странно, но поскольку схема по ссылке выше применяется везде, проблема скорее в номинатиме а не в данных.
да, я откатил на Советскую улицу.
сразу оговорюсь, что номинатим часто работает довольно странно, но поскольку схема по ссылке выше применяется везде, проблема скорее в номинатиме а не в данных.
возможно, номинатиму не хватает определения обьекта - вот так он находит https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%20ulica%2C%20%D0%B6%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE#map=15/54.1101/28.3614&layers=N
4004 (2024-06-02 13:18:42+00:00): ну и если вы что то собираете с номинатимом, приходите например в телеграм чат byosm, может там подскажут
Ryan Underwood _01 (2024-05-31 09:03:02+00:00): Hi Kegyah, please ensure that you tag these as natural:coastline, place:islet - as this has been added as a highway. I'll fix this one for you. Thanks for helping out!
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 12:07:57+00:00): Reverted by

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152078051
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 12:08:22+00:00): Please don't add fictional map elements. Thank you!
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-31 07:40:14+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11622340104
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11784580214

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
vasony (2024-06-24 04:04:20+00:00): Hi!

Why did you remove the area with amenity=university, tagging only the buildings to university?

Tamas
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-31 07:40:15+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy. Nazwa nadawana jest automatycznie, na podstawie wartości brand. Opcjonalnie, numer identyfikacyjny może być przekazany w polu ref.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11771576336

Dokumentacja paczkomatów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
eggie (2024-05-31 08:05:02+00:00): Hoi  Even gekeken,
Wanneer het hek gesloten is en Verboden Toegang.. Dan zal de veldweg achter het hek ook wel verboden toegang zijn. Dus je kunt dan aan de highway=track access=no toevoegen of evt. access=private als het privegrond betreft. 

MVG
eggie
BertusvanderPavert (2024-05-31 08:10:22+00:00): Thanks. Heb access=no toegvoegd. Is verboden toegang. 

Gr Bertus
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 12:13:18+00:00): Should be check by the local community.

Thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-03 10:28:04+00:00): Hallo,

ein Teil der hier gelöschten Wege, sind im Luftbild erkennbar. Anstatt das sie gelöscht werden, sollten die Wege eher mit den entsprechenden Tags versehen werden. Ansonsten kommt nächste Woche wieder jemand und trägt sie hier bei OSM ein.

Als Tags bietet sich folgendes: z.B. disused:* oder access=*

Danke.
ma-rt-in (2024-06-16 19:04:37+00:00): Siehe Kommentare https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152067936
NeisBot (2024-05-31 07:54:23+00:00): Hi DutchDoctor, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 97% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including:
- 6 highway(s)
- 19 building(s)
- 1 landuse(')

Could you please confirm if these deletions were intentional or if they occurred by mistake?

Looking forward to your response.

#DeletionsCheck
DutchDoctor (2024-05-31 07:59:05+00:00): Hi !

This is correct, I can take a picture of the building site if you like.

Cheers
eggie (2024-05-31 08:07:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Dit lijkt me niet correct. Je hebt een groot gebouw van de wijk gemaakt. 
Is de oostelijke wijk gesloopt?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2024-05-31 08:17:51+00:00): De oostelijke wijk staat nog op Bouwvergunning verleend. Er is voor de zorgwoningen nog geen sloopvergunning uitgegeven.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=Sint+Aloysiuslaan+31&objectId=0575010000148177&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=93979.04327710607&geometry.y=475539.2779545018&zoomlevel=13.712

Zijn die woningen werkelijk al gesloopt?
eggie (2024-05-31 08:21:04+00:00): Het beste kun je een terugmelding doen naar de BAG (Kadaster) .. zie link boven.. anders komen met de tussentijdse update de woningen gewoon weer terug in OSM.
eggie (2024-05-31 08:27:23+00:00): Het enorme gebouw heb ik verwijderd.
Het adres van nr 35 heb ik ook verwijderd. In OSM komen de adresnodes mee met de import.
De construction heb ik van de woningen verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-31 08:35:04+00:00): Wanneer er daadwerkelijk gebouwd gaat worden kun je via het forum van OSM om BAG import vragen in het draadje BAG importverzoeken.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

Dit waren je eigen edits.. Elk begin is moeilijk.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=152066854

Mapse
eggie
DutchDoctor (2024-05-31 10:27:31+00:00): Hartelijk bedankt 

Ik hoop dat ik er snel beter in word.
Fijne dag nog
eggie (2024-05-31 10:37:21+00:00): Je groeit er vanzelf wel in. Iedereen was ooit beginner.
Mapse..
eggie
eggie (2024-05-31 08:10:26+00:00): Dag DD  straten in woongebied zijn meestal highway=residential en meestal geen unclassified. In de specificatie van de straat in aanleg was dat al te zien.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-31 08:13:26+00:00): Is de Sint Aloysiuslaan  werkelijk een wandelpad.. Dus met een G7 bord vooraan.  In de specificatie van het wegenbestand staat deze als highway=residential

Zijn die straten al opgeleverd. Ze stonden op construction.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-31 08:39:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback    Gebruik de tag amenity=drinking_water Dan krijg je wel een symbool.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-31 08:20:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189623495

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
AndreaDp271 (2024-05-31 12:02:56+00:00): Modifica errata, ripristinare
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-31 12:13:10+00:00): Should be check by the local community.

Thanks!
BUKEA_LUHI (2024-06-03 06:13:49+00:00): Hey, 
i am part of the authority and this area is a protected one, so every route should therefore be officially approved
pitscheplatsch (2024-06-03 10:28:34+00:00): Hallo, danke für die Antwort.

Ein Teil der hier gelöschten Wege, sind im Luftbild erkennbar. Anstatt das sie gelöscht werden, sollten die Wege eher mit den entsprechenden Tags versehen werden. Ansonsten kommt nächste Woche wieder jemand und trägt sie hier bei OSM ein.

Als Tags bietet sich folgendes: z.B. disused:* oder access=*

Danke.
ma-rt-in (2024-06-16 19:00:06+00:00): Hallo Luhi,

willkommen im OSM-Universum, es freut mich das Du uns unterstützen möchtest.
Leider sind Änderungen bei uns als lokale Community negativ aufgefallen.
Das Löschen von Wegen ist falsch, solange diese vor Ort und sogar via Luft- und Sat-Bildern zu sehen sind. Wir haben dafür andere Möglichkeiten, wie das setzen von Zugangsberechtigungen oder dem Status eines Weges. Das Wiki, das Forum und alle anderen Informations- und Kommunikationswege können Dir dabei helfen.

Wie Dein Name und auch Deine Antwort den Eindruck erwecken lässt, Du seist ein Teil einer Behörde.
In dem Fall verweise ich auf folgende Richtline: https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
Diese ist unbedingt einzuhalten. 

Bei Fragen kannst Du mich gerne anschreiben.
Zu guter letzt: Ich werde deine Änderungen zurücksetzen aus vorgenannten Gründen.

Viele Grüße
literan (2024-06-02 17:23:50+00:00): вандальная правка. Откат
literan (2024-06-02 17:23:10+00:00): vandal edit. Revert
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-31 08:30:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nieprawidłowa wartość addr:postcode. Kod pocztowy powinien być formatu XX-XXX, gdzie X oznacza cyfrę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10259208393

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Lelio Alves (2024-05-31 08:40:49+00:00): Everything good but you need to use Q to make building look square
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152068497
Lelio Alves (2024-05-31 08:37:27+00:00): Good Job, Keep Mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152068503
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-05-31 10:34:16+00:00): this road (Ngõ 232 Hòa) motorcar can travel at all time, as in Mapillary images. Why you set Ngõ 232 Yên Hòa motorcar=destination?
literan (2024-06-02 17:21:52+00:00): all the edits in this changeset are vandal. Revert