piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Thibaultmol (2023-10-26 06:37:52+00:00): Sorry yeah, I noticed and was going to fix it this morning. 

It's not really the app itself that's at fault, it just has a bad preset for detecting bus stops it seems. The app itself works fine, it's just that the actual objects it loaded were the wrong ones. But I think maybe in belgium it might just not work well because we often have everything already separately mapped, so i'm not going to touch it anymore.

So just to confirm: you've already reverted everything that needed to be reverted? (sorry for the trouble, I had noticed something went wrong, and was going to fix my own mistakes this morning)
bxl-forever (2023-10-26 09:12:20+00:00): Everything has been fixed, don’t worry. :-)
SekeRob (2023-10-26 07:03:01+00:00): NB: Unfortunetly according this Osmose map filter there are dozens upon dozens of the double polygons, one line use to tag the inner area, the second - tagless line- given the inner role of the monstrous sized forest relation, version 535 now. See link, zooom to area
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=1170&zoom=10&lat=46.0417&lon=10.8009
YomanNH (2025-12-10 09:21:58+00:00): Hej, potwierdziłeś gdzieś nazwę tej drogi? Szukam i w internecie nic nie znalazłem. Pamiętasz może coś więcej, co było w uwadze napisane, na podstawie której dodałeś nazwę?
grzegorz75jan (2025-12-10 11:20:38+00:00): Nie znalazłem uwagi dotyczącej tej drogi https://ent8r.github.io/NotesReview/
uprkos (2025-12-10 11:33:22+00:00): Szczegółów nie pamiętam. Była na pewno uwaga, bo sam z siebie kombinatu bym nie tykał. W jakimś momencie anonimowe uwagi w Krakowie zostały ukryte, nie wiem czy teraz da się je wyszukać. W Krakowie najczęściej sprawdzam stan rzeczy na miejscu, ale tutaj nie jest to możliwe. Musiałem uznać treść uwagi za wiarygodną.
YomanNH (2025-12-12 07:05:58+00:00): Poprosiłem innego użytkownika, który edytował drogi na terenie kombinatu, sprawdził nazwy dróg i poprawił nazwy. Usunąłem jeszcze nieaktualne fixme z jednego fragmentu.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132908314
ivanbranco (2024-08-03 10:06:30+00:00): Hi bahnpirat, this sculpture was already mapped here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10053038407

is it a different one? was it moved? something else?

thanks and good mapping
bahnpirat (2024-08-03 14:58:48+00:00): I know what you mean. Is it an error by copy-pasting a OSM-Node? No! Is it the same object, at two locations, surveyed at different times? I believe not! These a to copies of the same sculpture! So, no error here.
ivanbranco (2024-08-03 15:26:22+00:00): I see. Then the error was using the other sculpture wiki tags, I replaced them with the correct ones here: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/11289635695

good mapping
citrula (2023-11-01 09:37:01+00:00): Hi Rich,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for making an effort to verify the road data on OSM. Many US roads were imported over 15 years ago now, and might not have been changed since then, so there are many nonexistent roads. However, for private features, instead of deleting them we add the appropriate access tag. This way, someone else won't come through and add it without the proper access tags. You can read about it on the wiki here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

Happy mapping!
Rich Curtis (2023-11-02 01:48:49+00:00): Okay. I understand. Will the changes I made update on OSM, or do they require further editing? None of the roads I removed could have been driven on by a car or ridden by a bicycle. I have a GPS file available showing which roads were still rideable.
citrula (2023-11-02 20:53:48+00:00): Whenever you upload a changeset, your changes are already applied to OSM. For roads that are impassible by normal cars and bikes, I would suggest you review the wiki page for highway=track - this can be used for land access roads which require some sort of high clearance vehicle to use.
woodpeck_repair (2023-10-26 00:41:06+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 143124536, 143124548, 143124568, 143124583, 143124619, 143124626, 143124636, 143124645, 143124665, 143124822.
t_ja (2023-10-26 17:48:04+00:00): Ahoj,
tie tagy religion+denomination na GVOZA je dufam omyl. Cirkevne gymnazium je az na Hurbanovej.

Taktiez format zapisu telefonneho cisla PaP je zly, cislo moze obsahovat znak "plus", a cislice (t.j. ziadne zatvorky, ciarky a netreba ani medzery). Viacero hodnot sa oddeluje bodkociarkou.

Prosim, oprav si to.

T.
Branisla_0 (2023-10-27 05:40:32+00:00): Cau, ano opravene, dik za report. Prosim ta ked si "tu", chcem sa ta spytat, preco su zduplikovane MHD zastavky? Napriklad Zitna - dve su v jednom smere, dve v druhom, nechapem ze preco ked relacie na MHD linky maju obe...

Brano
t_ja (2023-10-27 06:29:52+00:00): O zduplikovanych zastavkach v jednom smere v Ziline neviem. Pravdepodobne mas na mysli public_transport=platform (co je samotna zastavka, kde cakaju ludia) a public_transport=stop_position (co je bod na ceste, kde zastavuje autobus/trolejbus). Viac info na: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:public_transport

Tibor
Branisla_0 (2023-10-27 06:50:12+00:00): Okej, chapem a neslo by dat na jedno POI kombinaciu `public_transport=stop_position;platform`? Lebo na tom linku co si poslal tak je text `Create a relation including all stop positions (role: Role stop) and platforms (role: Role platform) related to this stop:` a pod tym obrazok kde nastavili aj aj. 
Ide mi hlavne o to ze ked je zastavka aj ako platform aj ako stop na dvoch roznych POI tak to vyzera tak... ...divne:)

Brano
t_ja (2023-10-27 06:56:13+00:00): Uz z tej definicie ich nejde dat dokopy, lebo autobus/trolejbus stoji na ceste, a ludia cakaju (vacsinou) na chodniku, t.j. mimo cesty. Nie som si isty, ci musi mat aj stop_position meno (ktore je rovnake ako meno zastavky, t.j. duplicita), ale MHD relaciam sa moc nevenujem, preto to radsej nechavam bezo zmeny.

T.
Filip009 (2023-10-27 20:56:54+00:00): Keď chceš v utorok ti vysvetlím ako to funguje, pokiaľ máš trocha času po hodine. Opravil som už všetky trolejbusové linky v Žiline, takže bus je v podstate to isté. 21ku som ešte neopravoval ;)
Branisla_0 (2023-10-27 21:01:37+00:00): Veľmi rád by som sa naučil avšak v utorok asi nebudem v škole:( prípadne ak sa kdesi na chodbe cez týždeň stretneme. Oki idem kuknúť ako vyzerajú trolejbusové. 
Diky za interakciu na koment, Braňo
Filip009 (2023-10-27 21:05:52+00:00): Tu môžeš vidieť, ktoré linky sú v OSM okej a ktoré nie https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=18.75513&lat=49.21546&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.50&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
Branisla_0 (2023-10-27 21:11:36+00:00): aha to je dost uzitocny link, diky. Inak ked si klinem na nejaku Autobusovu zastavku tak mi tam odporuca spravit zmeny: Aktualizovat znacky na bus=yes, mam to davat? Dava mi to na tych uzloch kde je public_transport=platform
Filip009 (2023-10-27 21:15:43+00:00): Vieš mi poslať link na konrétny node?
Branisla_0 (2023-10-30 07:31:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3883372409 tento
t_ja (2023-10-30 07:44:41+00:00): Na wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform to nie je uvedene. Ale zvykne sa davat bus=yes a/alebo trolleybus=yes, a nielen na public_transport=platform, ale aj na public_transport=stop_position. Myslim, ze by sa to dalo dopocitat z relacii, v ktorych je dany bod pridany, ale asi je to narocnejsie, ako to ziskat hned z bodu samotneho :)
Branisla_0 (2023-10-30 18:32:43+00:00): jasne, cize ak som spravne sformulovar zaver tak mam oznacit aj bus=yes (tam kde su autobusova zastavky) aj trolleybus=yes (tam kde su trolejbusove zastavky), pripadne obe ak zastavka operuje obe vozidla? A rovnako aj na public-transport=platform aj stop_position?:) 
P.S. ja som len novacik, ziadnu OSM revoluciu nechystam, ja sa skor tak pytam bo ma to zaujima :D
t_ja (2023-10-30 18:40:44+00:00): Presne tak by som to zaznacil. Ak chces, mozes este  pozriet, ako to maju v inych mestach (urcite BA to ma spravene podla wiki stranok).

Inak takychto "nedestrukcnych" uprav sa netreba bat: nemazes predsa zastavky, ani relacie tras, a ak sa nahodou ukaze, ze tagovanie ma byt zmenene, velmi lahko sa vytiahnu data (napr. cez Overpass API) a za minutku su zastavky pretagovane.
Alafoss (2023-10-26 09:51:50+00:00): Hi fmsjd,

I kindly request an explanation for your highway classification changes (e.g. changing roads from primary to residential). Your changes seem rather random. I'd like to refer you to the OSM wiki where you'll find plenty of information about mapping highways correctly https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway

"Little touches" is also not a useful description of your changeset. Please describe a bit further what and why you change attribution on the map.

Cheers
Felix
nevw (2023-10-26 10:51:41+00:00): I noticed you have dragged a node for a silo in the top right of this changeset
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=143135349
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-02 04:52:15+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15324
kubahahaha (2023-10-25 22:14:16+00:00): To nie jest przejście tylko głupio oznakowana część parkingu robiąca za chodnik
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11289669127
bxl-forever (2023-10-25 22:15:27+00:00): All those large "buildings" in Pakistan which you added do not seem to be buildings, they look more like residential areas, e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1218385857
Metzor (2023-10-25 22:24:46+00:00): Hi Daniel,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing :-) 

One general recommendation: changesets should be local. Uploading changes in Pakistan and Liverpool UK alerts quite a lot of people, that review osm changesets, as you can see by the huge orange rectangle on the map.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: 

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

 Why? Have a look at the section 
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!
goaned (2023-10-27 07:54:30+00:00): Hallo, der Name "Rabbiner-Friedmann-Platz" steht schon seit mindestens 2012 auf diesem Objekt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158765259

Du hast ihn auf zwei Objekte hinzugefügt: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11289768012 – das kann so absolut nicht stimmen, es kann kein name= geben ohne irgendetwas anderes dazu, was sagt, wovon das ein Name ist

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11289768013 – es kann zwar sein, dass da ein Spielplatz ist (ich kenne die Situation vor Ort nicht), aber ich denke nicht, dass der Spielplatz (!) "Rabbiner-Friedmann-Platz" heißt. Die meisten Spielplätze haben gar keinen Namen und wenn, dann keinen, der nur genau so heißt wie die Verkehrsfläche, auf der sie sich befinden.

Ich werde diese beiden Namen wieder entfernen, wenn keine Rückmeldung erfolgt.

LG
goaned (2023-10-28 08:02:05+00:00): zurückgesetzt mit CS 143247067, da keine weitere Rückmeldung erfolgt ist und ich vermute, dass (auch wenn es gut gemeint war) dieses CS im Wesentlichen komplett falsch war
MarcoR (2023-10-26 07:42:29+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM!

Una casa non si dovrebbe mappare se non è stata ancora costruita; se è in costruzione puoi usare il tag landuse=construction (per maggiori info leggi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction)

Buon mapping,
Marco
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-25 22:30:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11289765026

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-25 22:40:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2560873756
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249605195

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
map per (2023-10-26 08:12:42+00:00): REVERTED (personal bookmarks from Maps.me)
AntBurnett (2023-10-26 00:42:07+00:00): Hi MapCam - do you have "DCS Map Imagery" available in your list of imagery when editing in NSW? Generally, it is a higher resolution than Mapbox Satellite. Cheers, AntBurnett
AntBurnett (2023-10-26 00:44:31+00:00): I've just seen you are part of TfNSW Connected Journeys Data Team - of course you've seen DCS. Comment withdrawn :-)
Matt_ (2023-10-26 00:01:36+00:00): CO00803;CO01867
nevw (2023-10-26 00:19:15+00:00): Correction: Bing imagery used as source.
HellMap (2023-10-27 11:16:35+00:00): Hi!

Wanted to let you know that you shouldn't connect areas to ways, such as grass areas to roads. It's not correct, because the grass never reaches the center of the road. And it makes later editing more difficult.

Thanks
HellMap (2024-05-11 11:54:55+00:00): Sveiki!

Vai nav palicis atmiņā, kas tas par punktu - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11289892444 . Piezīmē norādīts "drainage", bet tad tas diez vai ir "well", kur var ņemt (parasti dzeramu) ūdeni.
Reinis Bērziņš (2024-05-12 15:04:41+00:00): Es izdzēsu šo aku pavisam, ko biju atlicis. Tikai nākamajā izbraucienā es pamanīju, ka esmu saputrojis kartē iezīmēto "aku" (kur patiesībā ir tikai betona drupas) ar turpat netālu novietotajiem/pamestajiem meliorācijas aku grodiem, kas nebija uzstādīti. Man šķiet, ka šos pagaidu novietotos grodos (būvmateriālus) nav vērts iezīmēt kartē.
Reinis Bērziņš (2024-05-12 15:16:19+00:00): Šajā gadījumā vairs nebūs aktuāli, bet vispār nākotnes vārdā: man šķiet, ka arī meliorācijas aka var tikt apzīmēta ar man_made=water_well, bet var pierakstīt klāt drinking_water=yes/no. Tīrās vietās meliorācijas akas var izmantot pilnīgi identiski kā dzeramā ūdens akas, kas abas parasti izraktas līdz gruntsūdeņu slānim. Arī es visu bērnību izmantoju 2 šādas meliorācijas akas gan dzeršanai gan piena dzesēšanai. Šeit doti dažādi piemēri, no kuriem 2 piemēros praksē nevar iegūt nekādu ūdeni: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwater_well
HellMap (2024-05-12 20:31:45+00:00): Skaidrs, paldies par precizējumu.

Jā, pagaidu būvniecības lietas nav jēgas zīmēt (izņemot teritoriju).

Vispārīgi, tiešam nevaru neko labāku par `man_made=water_well` atrast. Ja būtu apsegta/ar vāku, tad varētu vēl `man_made=manhole`. Bet tādas atvērtas, kur vēl var gruntsūdeni ņemt, laikam OSM nav precīza tega. Līdz šim neesmu gluži nekur sastapies ar tādu (vismaz nesabrukušu), tāpēc nav bijusi "problēma" iezīmēt.
citrula (2023-10-31 08:11:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143139207
citrula (2023-10-27 04:13:21+00:00): Looks good to me! Welcome to OSM!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143139579
gscholz (2023-10-28 06:44:26+00:00): Hi mohmmaddd,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=44.13784&lat=13.76897&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143139795

Especially way 400431038 is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400431038/history#map=15/13.7822/44.1296

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Hufkratzer (2023-10-26 21:54:14+00:00): Hi,
Isn't https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1218402911 a riding arena like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/637632889 ? (You have tagged it as a riding centre (leisure=horse_riding).
Kuatsystems (2023-10-26 22:00:02+00:00): that looks right, I changed it to match your suggestion, thanks!
slice0 (2023-12-25 08:55:21+00:00): tagged amenity as office_union,
gscholz (2023-11-10 07:47:24+00:00): Hi mohmmaddd,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=44.12478&lat=13.77715&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=143139952

Especially way 400431038 (residential area) is affected here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400431038#map=16/13.7802/44.1228

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Polarbear (2024-06-01 23:42:44+00:00): Another fake road separation. as you can see in mapillary imagery, there are small traffic islands only. everything else is just cobblestone on the same height as the asphalt around, so it can be driven over. 
You also created duplicate crossings where only one exists.
ftrebien (2023-11-17 23:35:06+00:00): 南极洲的所有小型永久性研究站都被绘制为小村庄（place=hamlet）。
ftrebien (2023-11-17 23:59:18+00:00): 我的意思是“全年科学考察站”。
Justin Hendrick (2024-06-23 04:14:10+00:00): Hey ajfite, thanks for marking this road as closed while they rebuilt the bridge. They have finished the new bridge and the road has re-opened (I passed through the area today). Could you update the map to remove the construction, please? I started to do it myself, but I don't know which tags need to change and I'm afraid of getting it wrong.
ajfite (2024-06-24 00:08:10+00:00): Can do
OldManCelli (2024-01-29 20:00:17+00:00): Does this new road go over Winship Lane? (Bridge = yes) or intersect with it?
sahilister (2023-10-26 08:05:12+00:00): Hi mani_k2, 
Great to see your work and thanks for making OpenStreetMaps data better with actual ground truth correction. A minor suggestion around making changes in smaller areas at once. For example, in this changeset, the bbox is pan India which makes checking what changed while also polluting edit history for others. 

Hope you'll understand. Feel free to drop by in OSM India telegram group at https://t.me/OSMIndia for any clarification.

Cheers!
sahilister
NorthCrab_upload (2023-10-26 04:40:25+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1152446730

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
SomeoneElse (2023-11-13 10:01:18+00:00): I'm guessing that perhaps https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688103320 is a free house rather than "operator=Freehold" (unless that is the name of an operating company)?
KasperSFranz (2023-11-13 10:24:20+00:00): It seems more logical that it is a free house than the operator is freehold, but I only updated the fhrs Ids in this changeset and I have not been at the bridge :)
SomeoneElse (2023-11-13 10:53:52+00:00): Just wondered - since you were last to update it, I thought that you might have been there.
aTarom (2023-10-27 12:50:45+00:00): Hola vate, gracias por editar, se ha quedado este nodo huérfano al retirar el tag de streetlamp
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11107525839/history
es un error o querías eliminarlo por que no existe?
Saludos
Andrés Ortiz Massó (2023-10-27 12:52:24+00:00): No existe, estaba señalado como una lámpara de calle, pero no hay tal allí
aTarom (2023-10-27 13:42:50+00:00): Ok gracias por contestar, pues entonces elimino el nodo. Saludos
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-27 03:15:31+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143190135
ovruni (2023-10-26 06:25:18+00:00): Hola Astrid Zapata, por favor revisa el desplazamiento para el mapeo que se ha indicado en la wiki al costado de cada tarea.
Saludos
Syl (2023-11-20 08:52:15+00:00): J'ai enlevé le recyclage du verre, le bac à verre est déjà présent à côté.
Hjart (2023-10-26 07:05:19+00:00): Bemærk at landbrugsjord sagtens kan være grønt. Jeg vil vurdere at dette er landbrugsjord. Arealer der kun midlertidigt er bevokset med græs bør ikke tagges som eng.
kortgodt (2023-10-26 08:49:11+00:00): Arealet har engkarakter i flere sæsoner.
daganzdaanda (2023-10-26 17:49:57+00:00): Hallo Kerscher GmbH, 
willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Ihr habt angekreuzt, dass sich jemand die Änderungen anschauen soll: Alles gut, danke! 

Wenn ihr wollt, könnt ihr auch noch die Webseite und Telefon und E-Mail angeben. Das kann manchmal die Kontaktaufnahme erleichtern.

Bei Fragen steh ich gern zur Verfügung. Auch das Forum ist sehr hilfreich: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56

Wenn ihr Zeit und Lust habt, wäre es sehr nett, wenn ihr eure "Nachbarn" im Gewerbegebiet auch eintragen könntet. Vor allem Hausnummern sind wichtig.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen, 
Servus,
daganzdaanda
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-27 03:15:32+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143190135
L'imaginaire (2024-04-15 19:52:56+00:00): Ik neem aan dat de naam van deze toekomstige verkaveling niet "Verkaveling 48 woningen" is. Indien correct, dan beter die beschrijving verhuizen naar het "description" veld.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-31 15:34:19+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1194833937/history has building = 79 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
trigpoint (2023-10-26 16:07:23+00:00): Spam reverted
arjunaraoc (2024-01-07 00:27:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my improvements: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145975702
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143145603
Hufkratzer (2023-10-26 09:18:40+00:00): Hi,
was du als "Reitanlagen" gemappt hast (
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1218443844
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1218443845 )
sind keine Reitanlagen, sondern Reitplätze (bzw. Roundpens). Dafür gibt es das Preset "Reitplatz", welches die dafür üblicherweise verwendeten Tags leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian setzt.

Gleiches Problem hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1218391242

Vgl. Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
vng_me (2023-10-26 12:29:23+00:00): Why??
user_17222985 (2023-10-26 06:47:41+00:00): source:name https://t.me/DecolonizationUkraine/3635
arjunaraoc (2024-01-08 14:34:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check my update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146031443
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143146555
arjunaraoc (2024-01-08 14:21:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia).

Check out my update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146030978
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143146688