piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
habi (2025-12-05 09:10:11+00:00): Ciao ciropom
In https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5075699 it was noted that the statue is at the wrong position.
Can you tell us why you deleted it in front of the Villa Ciani and put it here at the tip of the park?
Greetings,
habi

PS: I moved the statue back according to what's stated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5075699
habi (2025-12-05 09:11:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175538180
ciropom (2025-12-05 10:40:13+00:00): Because I was there in those days, the statue was not there. I asked and some park-keeper told me that the statue was there only for the presentation to the community, and then moved to the tip of the park. 
But actually there is only the basament, because the actual statue was drown in the lake.. it is waiting for restoration.
TinPetreković (2025-10-22 07:50:44+00:00): hgv=no tag on the accidentally tagged node has been removed in changeset 173613713

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173613713
strk (2025-10-22 12:50:59+00:00): Sicuro ci sia una biblioteca ? Non mi risulta ..
Đuro Jiří (2025-10-22 18:15:03+00:00): Secondo wikidata si.
strk (2025-10-23 09:41:48+00:00): c'era una biblioteca ma al momento inagibile in vecchia scuola. Fonte: abitante.
fūrai-bō (2025-12-13 22:03:11+00:00): 昔サンクス高島平北店があった場所がファミリーマート高島平北店に変更されていることをたまたま見かけました。
確認したところ、この変更セットで更新されているようです。
しかし、そのファミリーマートは有史以来一度も存在していません。これは実在しないファミリーマートです。現地を確認した上での更新なのでしょうか？

知る限りでは、このサンクスはファミリーマートには転換せず、閉店後は東京スター銀行 高島平支店ファイナンシャル・ラウンジになり、それが閉店した現在ここにはまいばすけっと高島平駅前店があります。
fūrai-bō (2026-01-17 10:40:58+00:00): お返事がないので、こちらで虚偽で登録された不正な地物とみなして実在しない店舗の削除、および実在する店舗の追記作業をさせていただきました。
rhhs (2025-12-08 19:38:07+00:00): Hi Mitko, what's your justification for changing the name of the river? The previous naming (Dragalevska reka and Novachnitsa) is in agreement with the KAIS map.
Dimitar155 (2025-12-08 19:59:08+00:00): It is quite a headache to explain... In short terms, the cadastre (and the river agency) do not make a difference between local/alternative and official names. Which name is which is debatable. Consider it work in progress since there are still stuff to figure out (both in regards to names and their sections).
rhhs (2025-12-09 09:38:44+00:00): OK, I don't want to give you a headache but am interested. What does  https://kais.cadastre.bg/bg/geonames say? (got the link from ignisf/tevildo_ but don't have the skills to access it myself)
Dimitar155 (2025-12-09 19:12:17+00:00): "Слатинска/Slatinska"
rhhs (2026-01-28 19:05:02+00:00): Still wondering. I would guess it's called Slatinska only from where Vartopo flows into it, and definitely Dragalevska where it flows through Dragalevtsi. On all the paper maps of Sofia and Vitosha that I have, it's called Dragalevska until Loven Park
maaxy_ (2025-11-18 12:21:58+00:00): Cześć, masz w planach dodać przystanki metra?
sadzona1902 (2025-11-18 12:40:30+00:00): patrzyłem na inne miasta (warszawę) i nie mają wpisanych, więc się wstrzymałem z tym, ale może warto jednak dodać?
maaxy_ (2025-11-24 15:38:40+00:00): Mysle ze warto, patrzac na to ze sa rozpisane lokalizacje stacji w dokumentacji
mga_geo (2025-10-23 06:18:46+00:00): Bonjour,
Plusieurs relations route=bus viennent de perdre leur continuité suite à vos dernières modifications.
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Marc
 r11915129 r11915136 r11916320 r11916322 r11920341 r11920342 r11920347 r11920349 r11920351 r11920357 r12010264 r12010265 r11920362 r11920363 r11920369 r11920370 r11920375 r11920376 r11920377 r11920378 r11920388 r11920389 r11920390 r11920391 r11920394 r11920399 r11920401 r11920404 r11920408 r11920412
flohoff (2025-10-23 08:19:04+00:00): Moin,
Da ist noch ein Note drauf das hier eine Neubaubaustelle ist. 

Der ist doch jetzt auch überflüssig oder?
Schlumpfhasenbär (2025-10-23 08:57:47+00:00): ja, hatte ihn zur Info gelassen.... insbesondere für die neue Vehrkehrsinsel, damit das nicht wieder einer einfach ändert...
totera (2025-10-22 12:20:20+00:00): Ciao arcanma, era corretto prima. L'ID di wikidata del comune è già sulla relazione; sul nodo village c'era quello della località capoluogo (il cui nome, ormai meno usato, è in alt_name).
arcanma (2025-10-22 14:15:58+00:00): Grazie Totera, ho ripristinato. Sinceramente ho avuto qualche dubbio perché wikipedia lo definisce come comune sparso con capoluogo in località Trebbio, ma nel sito del comune e anche in OSM non ho trovato tracce di questa località Trebbio, non avevo notato l'alt_name
olo81 (2025-12-23 14:32:43+00:00): W jakim celu dodajesz puste relacje? 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Relation:street
stimoroll (2025-12-23 14:43:02+00:00): Miała być relacja street do podłączenia do WikiData - bo do WD nie łączy się fragmentów tylko całe ulice. Ale czemu nie jest w WD nie wiem - może bot WD się zaciął.
olo81 (2025-12-23 14:48:36+00:00): Wywaliłem ją, była niekompletna, brak roli.  Już nie wspominając że w żaden sposób nie łączyła się z Wiki. Tylko dwa tagi zawierała.
olo81 (2025-12-23 15:48:22+00:00): widzę że więcej takich pustych relacji https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19741620
olo81 (2025-12-24 00:54:54+00:00): Na 40 ulic tylko dwie miały przypisane wiki, reszta skasowana.
Frans S (2025-10-22 09:31:04+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator to check that the tasks have been mapped in accordance with the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
We cannot expect from a new mapper that he/she delivers high-quality mappings from the start, so we offer some guidance.
Please pay attention to the next summarized issues. (see attached document with examples for more info)
-------------------------------------------------------------
You did not solve the issues shown by the issue triangle of iDeditor.
A: Inaccurate mapping. 

B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collecting adjacent buildings and mapped it as 1 building.

D: Connecting Nodes to other features.

E: Buildings not squared or rounded.
G: Included the shadow of the building.
High building(s) incorrect mapped. 
Check this footage how to map high buildings

https://youtu.be/dsfUcslLtVc?si=yH6eWDbsb_ILAVb9
 Or See par 20 chapter About Buildings


Explanation can be found in this document what  might be helpful to strengthen your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping!
Frans S
user_5359 (2025-10-22 16:46:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM.
eggie (2025-10-22 09:41:51+00:00): Dag linuxrev,

Het beste kun je zoiets laten importeren via het forum.
Dan komen alle juiste gegevens uit het Kadaster mee.
Zie draadje: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/3898

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-22 09:50:31+00:00): Het staat nog op Bouwvergunning verleend . Je zou een terugmelding kunnen doen naar het Kadaster.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/?searchQuery=De+Venen+2&objectId=0037010000378486&theme=BRT+Achtergrond&geometry.x=260878.005&geometry.y=556070.4739999999&zoomlevel=15

Ik heb het nu even aangepast mbv de BAG

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-22 09:55:46+00:00): Svp geen adresgegevens aan gebouwen toevoegen. Er zijn al adresnodes.
Ik zal deze weer verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
linuxrev (2025-10-22 10:08:20+00:00): OK. Die BAG-import was ik vergeten. Staat nu genoteerd. Bedankt!
linuxrev (2025-10-22 10:09:40+00:00): MVG, uiteraard.
bxl-forever (2025-10-22 09:09:50+00:00): Hello, Comrade Duck,

This office is a political party and not an ngo.
(NGO is for Amnesty International, Doctors without Borders…)

Also: phone numbers always in international (ITU-T E.164) format, please: "+32 3…" and not "03…"

Don’t worry, I fixed your edit.
eggie (2025-10-22 09:33:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   Voor Nederland begint phone=  altijd met +31 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Kweetwel (2025-10-22 12:25:10+00:00): Ik heb het even aangepast. Dank je wel.
eggie (2025-10-22 12:28:20+00:00): 👍
真中あお (2025-12-19 14:16:09+00:00): 网友您好，感谢您一直以来对osm的贡献。不过，我冒昧地建议一下：最好不要在iD编辑器使用天地图的自定义图层。
这是因为iD编辑器在上传时会自动在变更集记录使用过的图层，包括您带有个人密钥的天地图网址。这样，一方面，osm管理员可能会因为版权存疑撤销您的编辑；另一方面密钥泄露，其他人可以使用您的天地图额度。
想要使自定义图层而不自动写入变更集，可以安装和使用josm编辑器。另外方便的话也欢迎您加入qq群290278518，和更多编辑者交流~
Tatfahren (2025-12-20 08:43:16+00:00): Gab es einen Grund warum du hier das building:part in der Kirche gelöcht hast, oder war das ein Versehen?

z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1044775809
NeisBot (2025-10-22 09:16:45+00:00): Привет Zhake_05, добро пожаловать и спасибо за ваш вклад!

Чтобы сделать сотрудничество проще и помочь другим понять ваши правки, лучше добавить краткое описание сделанных изменений. Ясные комментарии помогают сообществу следить за вашей работой и предоставлять более качественную обратную связь. Вы можете найти советы по написанию хороших комментариев здесь[1].

На основе ваших правок карты в этом наборе изменений, я составил предложение о том, как мог бы выглядеть комментарий: "Обновлена дорога с названием Қалкөз, асфальтовое покрытие"
(Auto-translation)
---
Hi Zhake_05, welcome and thanks for your contribution!

To make collaboration easier and help others understand your edits, it’s best to add a short description of the changes you made. Clear comments help the community follow your work and provide better feedback. You can find tips on writing good comments here[1].

Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Updated road with name Қалкөз, asphalt surface"
---
[1] https://osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
limes11 (2025-10-26 09:10:39+00:00): Hallo surveyor54,

danke für das Vervollständigen der NSGs. Eine Frage: Hast Du bewusst damit aufgehört, beim Erfassen der NSGs den leisure=nature_reserve-tag zu setzen oder ging der beim copy&pasten verloren ?

Einen schönen Sonntag und viele Grüße

Limes
surveyor54 (2025-10-26 13:59:44+00:00): Hi, du hast Post.🙋
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 06:44:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443895767#map=19/18.930291/99.411415&layers=N

is it amenity=cafe ?
AlaskaDave (2026-02-04 07:51:00+00:00): Haha - it is. I must have hit <shift>R and copied wrong tags. Who knows? Anyway, good catch. I corrected it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 10:08:06+00:00): thanks for a fix!
mavl (2025-11-15 10:56:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 174681717 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
rempshaener (2025-10-22 18:22:11+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe einige Anmerkungen zu deinen Bearbeitungen.

Adresse:
Hydranten haben keine Adresse im Sinne des addr:*-Schemas.
Dass überhaupt Adressen an Hydranten erfasst werden, ist zumindest nicht unstrittig.
Sofern das unumgänglich ist, erfolgt dies mittels object:*-Schema, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:object:*
Für den Fall, dass du dies umsetzt, dazu noch folgende Hinweise:
Straßen werden genau so eingetragen, wie sie bereits erfasst sind.
Hier heißt die Straße „St.-Andreas-Straße“, sie darf dann nicht als „St.Andreas Str.“ gespeichert werden.
„Kindergarten“ ist kein zulässiger Wert für addr:housenumber.

Name:
Hydranten haben keinen Namen.
In diesem Fall sind die Daten auch verzichtbar, da vollständig redundant.

Viele Grüße

P.S.: Auf dem Luftbild ist gut erkennbar, dass der Hydrant 5 m weiter am Zaun steht.
rempshaener (2025-10-30 19:05:24+00:00): Hallo,
ich möchte noch einmal an die Überarbeitung erinnern.
Viele Grüße
eggie (2025-10-22 10:15:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback...  De info heb ik samengevoegd met de al bestaande adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2025-10-22 10:23:14+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Voor nu even building= aangepast naar building:part ivm rendering op de kaart.
De info zou ook verplaatst kunnen worden naar de adresnode. Is dat nr 44?
MVG
eggie
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-22 10:32:24+00:00): Alle info heb ik naar de adresnode verplaatst ivm renderen naam.
Even rendering afwachten.
CTRL-F5 voor versneld effect.

MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-30 19:02:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1042042231/history has elevation = 152 that was added in this edit
why not use regular ele= tag?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele
Bat Wings (2026-05-11 08:19:42+00:00): Hello 
İts my fault I know how to use ele=*
I made the correction as ele=* 
Thank you for feedback.
marczoutendijk (2025-12-28 09:53:18+00:00): Waarom hier die fixme:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3345745564/history/6#map=19/52.154355/5.387685
De singelgracht is toch correct als kanaal getagd?
Ik twijfel over de naam die daar is gebruikt ("Brug over de Singelgracht"), want dat staat nergens. Het IS een brug over de Singelgracht, maar of hij ook zo heet?
wouterko (2025-12-28 10:26:43+00:00): Hi Marc, nog niet aan die toegekomen idd. De way is momenteel niet getagd als brug (geen man_made=bridge). Omdat de 'brug' onder de gebouwen door zou lopen is het hier misschien makkelijker om het water als tunnel te taggen. Maar had nog niet bedacht hoe dit te gaan fixen.
mga_geo (2025-10-25 15:23:25+00:00): Bonjour,
Beaucoup de relations route=bus cassées sur Saint-Brieuc suite à vos modifications:
r11915129 r11915136 r11916320 r11916322 r11920341 r11920342 r11920347 r11920349 r11920351 r11920357 r12010264 r12010265 r11920362 r11920363 r11920369 r11920370 r11920375 r11920376 r11920377 r11920378 r11920388 r11920389 r11920390 r11920391 r11920394 r11920399 r11920401 r11920404 r11920408 r11920412  r14194687 r14194709
Pouvez-vous corriger ?
Marc
simon_geovelo (2025-10-30 09:28:18+00:00): Bonjour,
Sur qu'elle outil détecter vous les relations de bus cassé ? 
Pour que je puisse m'en servir pour les réparer.
mga_geo (2025-10-30 15:03:12+00:00): Bonjour,
PTNA est mon outil préféré de suivi de réseau: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/FR/BRE/FR-BRE-TUB-Analysis.html

Après des modifs, on peut demander une nouvelle analyse avec résultat dans la vingtaine de minutes.
simon_geovelo (2025-10-31 09:32:45+00:00): Merci pour l'outil. 
J'ai corrigé l'ordre des ways sur toutes les relations citées.
Josm quand on coupe une voie ne les ordonnes pas forcément comme il faut dans la relation. Pour les autres erreurs elle ne résultent pas de mes modifications ;-)
mga_geo (2025-11-02 15:41:44+00:00): Il en restait dont l'origine me semblait bien geovelo et les coupures de voies après un rond-point.
Un ticket a été ouvert il y a plusieurs mais https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/24076#ticket mais sans correction. Vous pouvez peut-être en remettre une couche ?
Marc
HurricaneGator (2025-10-29 21:31:59+00:00): Hello MaxR_6429.

I noticed you opened up Horadiz-Cəbrayıl-Zəngilan-Ağbənd yolu. According to various articles from 2025-09-16 (https://report.az/en/infrastructure/horadiz-jabrayil-zangilan-aghband-road-95-complete, https://report.az/en/infrastructure/horadiz-jabrayil-zangilan-aghband-road-95-complete), the highway is 95% complete, and given this is such a long stretch of highway, it seems it may be early to open the road here. Are you able to confirm this is open to all traffic?
Binarea (2025-10-22 10:11:24+00:00): Thx
jb54osm (2025-10-22 17:53:36+00:00): Hi BCNorwich,

Stoopweg is narrow, so I restored lanes=1. Please be careful.
tastrax (2025-10-24 22:09:01+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country and regional code +61 x xxxx xxxx, +61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Phone_Numbers .  I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Fraxi (2025-10-22 12:14:00+00:00): Махнах описателното име:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173624803
Писах ви на лично съобщение.
Anonymous36863 (2025-10-22 13:17:56+00:00): Прочетох го.
raphaelmirc (2025-10-24 00:20:58+00:00): Olá, 

gostaria de informar que você pode mapear o nome da rua com a tag 
name=Rua Remi Arruda 

e a rua alternativa com a tag 
alt_name=Rua 04

esse é o modelo correto para mapear um nome de Rua e o nome de rua alternativo.

você pode fazer o mapeamento assim. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173695891#map=18/-7.522718/-46.027525 

como eu mapiei essa rua com a tag name para o nome principal da rua e alt_name para o nome alternativo da Rua.
BER319 (2025-10-22 11:03:23+00:00): Bitte begründe einmal deine Änderungen von trach zu path

Vielen Dank
BER319 (2025-10-23 17:30:01+00:00): Revert mit
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173685393
NeisBot (2025-10-22 11:06:42+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-22 11:06:42+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Mental health treatment center in Cherry Hill NJ"
NeisReview (2025-10-26 10:15:14+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173637387
TrickyFoxy (2025-10-26 23:31:45+00:00): Не вносите личные данные в OSM
pyram (2025-10-24 18:41:25+00:00): Review siehe PN
NeisBot (2025-10-22 11:24:39+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution.

Your changeset was commented because it appears to follow a pattern that could be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related.

Could you kindly confirm if your map edits were intentional?

#MapWithoutSpam #Name #Comment
Udarian (2025-10-22 14:26:36+00:00): Why did you remove the address and building tags from this, it looks like a building on both bing aerial and Esri. Is the address incorrect, if so what is the correct one.
user_5359 (2025-10-22 16:37:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I reverted you SPAM entry.
NeisReview (2025-10-26 10:14:48+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173637254
eggie (2025-10-22 11:40:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Feedback.. Op de eindnodes heb ik noexit=yes toegevoegd anders wordt het wellicht weer opnieuw ingetekend.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Stockbaard (2025-10-22 13:42:46+00:00): Dank Eggie voor de introductie en feedback!
NeisBot (2025-10-22 11:36:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisBot (2025-10-22 11:36:42+00:00): Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Company building for industrial automation and maintenance services"
NeisReview (2025-10-26 10:14:06+00:00): 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173786950
silversurfer83 (2025-10-22 16:53:10+00:00): Moin Gerhard :)

für Güllepötte empfehle ich
man_made=storage_tank + content=slurry

happy mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173623270
Gerhard42 (2025-10-23 09:29:17+00:00): danke für den Hinweis, ich war unterwegs und wollte es noch nachpflegen... vergessen!
silversurfer83 (2025-10-26 17:49:55+00:00): Alles gut :)

kenn ich
user_5359 (2025-10-22 16:34:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your advertising on the street crossing.
JeroenHoek (2025-10-22 12:04:11+00:00): Deze wijziging doet eigenlijk niets, omdat de weg al geen toegangsbeperkingen had. Wat probeer je te doen?
Erwin (VRG) (2025-10-22 12:11:04+00:00): Te forceren dat de brandweer hier langs genavigeerd kan worden. Dit scheelt serieus in aanrijtijd. Daarnaast heb ik one-way op nee gezet ipv onbekend.
JeroenHoek (2025-10-22 12:56:16+00:00): Dat snap ik, maar dat verandert niets. Bij een ontbrekende oneway is oneway=no impliciet. Bij ontbrekende access-tagging is access=yes impliciet (en emergency=yes ook).

Navigatietools vermijden die weg omdat het nu een oprit is (service=driveway).

Sowieso zal een navigatietool de voorkeur geven aan een beetje omrijden over residential/unclassified boven service (hier langs de Hoflaan en De Gast).
JeroenHoek (2025-10-22 12:59:25+00:00): Ik heb de driveway er hier afgehaald:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173626782
Erwin (VRG) (2025-10-22 13:01:35+00:00): Prima. Maar baat 'emergency yes' niet, dan schaadt ie niet.
JeroenHoek (2025-10-22 13:06:13+00:00): Jawel, tags die impliciet zijn op een plaats waar niet duidelijk is waarom ze er staan worden door andere mappers bij onderhoud weer opgeruimd. We gebruiken dit soort tags alleen waar dat vanwege de situatie echt nodig is, bijvoorbeeld omdat ander verkeer er alleen als bestemmingsverkeer mag komen, of omdat oneway=yes fout wordt ingesteld terwijl de weg in werkelijkheid oneway=no is. Dat is hier allemaal niet aan de orde.

Door impliciete tags expliciet neer te zetten waar dat niet hoeft, creëer je verwarring.
Erwin (VRG) (2025-10-22 13:23:52+00:00): oke, gooi maar weg. ik los t ander op.
Aralqum (2025-10-28 19:23:06+00:00): Hello mmorec,

I see you have reclassified Avenida Regimiento 13 de Caballería and the other main roads in Toay to primary. I would like to point out that according to OSM policy(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary), primary highways are meant for linking large towns or serving as major arterials in big cities, neither of which apply to the highways here. Additionally, major highways generally do not terminate onto highways on much lower classifications, such as at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1319548749. If you agree, how would you feel about changing the classifications to tertiary or secondary?

Thank you and have a nice day.
MassCartog (2025-10-22 15:45:19+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Some of the features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. Discouraging trespassing is an invalid reason for data removal from OpenStreetMap.

You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, designated or informal/illegal/unauthorized. Even decommissioned trails should not be removed until they no longer exist. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism.

It's clear that these features still exist on the ground. Not being public access areas is an invalid reason to remove data from OSM. So this edit is incorrect and damaging to valid OSM data.

The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or access=no would be appropriate if they are closed to the public. Once this is done, services that do use OSM data will reflect that and specify their access.

This feature is now tagged correctly with the access=private tag.

Please read this for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won't_delete_roads_on_private_property
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-10-25 20:30:38+00:00): reverted. please provide a source for major road deletions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173771486
WWSS (2026-04-29 05:39:46+00:00): 國外的衛星影像有很大偏移，只能用於新增、請絕對不要用於修改已有的圖資！
lilauid (2026-05-02 16:32:59+00:00): 多謝閣下提醒。我之後一定注意！