piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NorthCrab_upload (2026-01-30 08:11:03+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472593200

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
silversurfer83 (2026-01-30 19:13:31+00:00): hi there :)

have you told the person that created this node about your reason to remove it? They can't learn without communication, you know

cheers
Comino (2026-01-30 22:20:48+00:00): Hey.

That’s what I normally always do.
I forgot this time.
Thanks for the reminder.
I sent a message just now.

Edwin
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:29:08+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 56 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/51342669 v20 | 26 crossings
https://osm.org/way/996345447 v3 | 16 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1381921078 v2 | 14 crossings

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177878512
bartgron (2026-01-31 14:56:13+00:00): Zestaw zmian zawierał błędy i dlatego został wycofany:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177928951
Proszę o uważność przy dodawaniu nowych obiektów do mapy.
Pozdrawiam
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:31:06+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13509444578 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Administración de propiedades"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:28:02+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257634
(No visible changes after review)
Glassman (2026-01-30 18:25:46+00:00): Some of the crossings you added don't exist on the imagery. Adding these can impact people with limited mobility, such as those using wheelchairs. Washington State has a large community of mappers trying to map sidewalks to help those people. Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Pedestrian_Working_Group/Schema for a lot of detail on how ot map sidewalks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177878694
ATownBike (2026-01-31 00:42:47+00:00): There are a bunch of new sidewalks and lowered curbs that just went in on Q last year.

The R ave reconstruction did quite a bit of it, but it also looks like some funding was from the TBP in FY25.  Here is the project description for the R ave pieces:

https://www.anacorteswa.gov/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=1064&ARC=1648

I took the nice weather days we had to get the bike out and take a ride around the area.
Glassman (2026-01-31 02:34:54+00:00): Great news. I'll drive by in the next couple of days to get some street view imagery.
woodpeck (2026-01-30 08:58:40+00:00): Dear Hamadi Mshabaha, thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. When you upload a changeset, other mappers will see the changeset comment that you specify. Please choose a changeset comment that is human-readable so that others can understand what you have been doing. This is especially important if you, like here, delete lots of buildings; other mappers will see this and ask themselves "why were these buildings deleted". Your current changeset comment of "#hotosm-project-39210 #JUBAInfrastructureDigitization2026 #OMDTZ" is not sufficient - nobody who is not part of your project will understand this.
Frans S (2026-02-02 14:44:36+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most objects and mapped. 
However, High rise / buildings with a few storys needs a different approach. See the link to the footage I've send you.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
In this document, you will find some hints and tricks which might help to expand your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177879200
Fizzie-DWG (2026-02-14 06:28:24+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19782
k9h10a (2026-01-30 09:45:46+00:00): Salut. De ce doar jumatate de lot 3 cu finantare PT?
Daca e o scapare, poti folosi relatia DEx16 - Lot 3 ca sa aplici uniform la totul lotul
danutzu (2026-01-30 09:49:23+00:00): sorry, n-am apucat sa termin. :)
Desigut, este tot lotul
k9h10a (2026-01-30 09:54:57+00:00): Am inteles. Ca sugestie, poti sa folosesti JOSM ca sa selectezi toti membrii care fac parte din lotul 3 si sa aplici o singura data modificarea peste tot (intr-un singur changeset).
earthlogger (2026-01-31 08:07:36+00:00): Hallo Leonel00,
bitte aufpassen beim editieren der Karte. Du hast hier einen einen Node (node/1606344939) verschoben.
Norbert Dichter (2026-01-30 11:30:50+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177880195
Norbert Dichter (2026-01-30 11:30:35+00:00): Hello, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. Thank you for your contribution. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Or just hit the Q-key.
Also please keep in mind: many buildings are very close but do not actually touch each other, try to map them close to each other without letting them connect or share nodes with each other, roads, or residential area outlines. In the iD web editor, holding down the "alt" key will keep nodes from "snapping" to each other and accidentally connecting.  Thanks so much for your contribution, Norbert 'Nodi' Dichter, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177880220
arjunaraoc (2026-02-22 00:15:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check my updates
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177880316
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 12:10:04+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other mistagging for Lucid Private Offices POI in changeset 184691737

https://osm.org/changeset/184691737
Sakari_N (2026-02-07 12:15:44+00:00): Moi,

Tässä lisäämässäsi tiessä on aika mahdottomia muotoja, sekä hieman erikoisesti nopeusrajoitus. Onko tuolla oikeasti liikennemerkit nopeusrajoituksesta?

Lisäksi sopivampi tieluokka olisi varmaankin highway=service + service=parking_aisle
GrabTH_Bulakorn (2026-01-30 09:22:59+00:00): source=aerial_imagery
Muhmaker (2026-02-02 13:26:58+00:00): Da hast du ja einen ziemlich großen Kanal-Schacht gefunden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218895307  Oder hast du Stress mit dem ganzen Viertel? ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177880888
flohoff (2026-02-02 21:33:40+00:00): Da hab ich wohl mal wieder tags im eifer des Gefechts an das falsche objekt gepackt.

Good catch.
Rainero (2026-03-17 18:49:57+00:00): Revert mit changeset/180024113
(unzulässige Quelle)
Ltrlg (2026-01-30 10:37:59+00:00): Bonjour !

Vus les caractéristiques de cette modification et la similarité des sites web, êtes-vous la même personne que https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/IHECF et https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Studio_m ? Si oui, quel est l’intérêt de créer un nouveau compte à chaque fois ?
Frans S (2026-01-31 16:36:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Why do you tag objects which are good to identify als buildings as 'natural=water' ?
Best regards
GrabTH_Bulakorn (2026-01-30 09:40:07+00:00): Source: local knowledge
Till_btn (2026-02-12 10:22:08+00:00): Hallo, wo ist der Abschnitt denn nicht kreuzungsfrei? Siehe auch die `highway:note`-Tags
YellowSoul (2026-02-12 20:43:59+00:00): Hallo, wenn die Luftbilder nicht mittlerweile veraltet sind, ist das doch eine Ampelkreuzung bei der Einfahrt von der Lilienthalstraße, oder?
Till_btn (2026-02-12 22:42:05+00:00): Kreuzen tun sich die Straßen nicht, aber ja, an den Einfahrten stehen Ampeln. Stadtauswärts müsste trunk dann aber hier starten: www.osm.org/way/390901433
. Und bei den Straßensegmenten, die du geändert hast, bitte noch die Kommentare aktualisieren, denn dort steht noch drin, warum es sich um trunk handelt
evgenykatyshev (2026-01-30 12:37:00+00:00): Добрый день. В очередной раз прошу вас не сдвигать дома по спутниковым снимкам Bing. Все эти исправления бессмысленны и только создают ненужную работу мне и другим картографам, которые вынуждены исправлять это за вами.
Wulf4096 (2026-02-21 10:04:20+00:00): Wo siehst du hier Kreuzungen außer Auf/Abfahrten?
YellowSoul (2026-02-22 09:37:25+00:00): Beide Abfahrten sind als Ampelkreuzungen ausgeführt
Wulf4096 (2026-02-22 10:31:00+00:00): Da hast du natürlich Recht, die hatte ich auch übersehen/vergessen; bin ewig nicht mehr da langgefahren.
edc22 (2026-03-23 22:15:19+00:00): poprawiłem routing w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180327461
フーヴァー　リー (2026-01-30 12:56:02+00:00): 又来了，又把其他校区地址乱放了
user_21812011 (2026-01-30 15:30:49+00:00): According to the administrative division system of the Chinese authorities(socalled PRC,if you like), Jiashan County (嘉善县)belongs to Jiaxing City(嘉兴市), Zhejiang Province. Based on this, I  make the necessary modifications to the elements. Please understand.
Kiana_Kaslana (2026-01-31 04:37:48+00:00): The problem is you added wrong street name...
user_21812011 (2026-02-01 12:43:26+00:00): I apologize for adding the incorrect road name. 
However, the incorrect administrative structure of "Jiashan County, Zhejiang Province" must be corrected.
フーヴァー　リー (2026-02-01 14:12:00+00:00): 主要问题是地址这种有的没的东西，你还不如去西塘古镇加建筑和POI实在
evgenykatyshev (2026-01-30 12:49:51+00:00): Здесь вы снова сдвинули корпуса по неправильным снимкам. Я исправил, но огромная просьба так не делать.

Я вам в личные сообщения написал более подробное объяснение. Если нужна какая-то помощь, то я готов помочь.
arjunaraoc (2026-02-17 00:56:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  Please visit  India page on OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India) and  join OSM India Telegram channel (https://t.me/OSMIndia). Check whether https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree_row  may be a better tag instead of landuse=forest
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177882481
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:29:20+00:00): Welcome, and thanks for your edits!

I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying highway types or adding tags) can lead to unexpected crossings being detected afterwards.

In total, I detected 35 potential crossings.

⚠️️ Problematic elements (top 3):
https://osm.org/way/607043467 v4 | 18 crossings
https://osm.org/way/1026781183 v3 | 17 crossings

⚠️ Dragged Nodes (max 3):
https://osm.org/node/9499954613 v2

Would you mind revisiting those areas?

#CrossingCheck
---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=177882492
trial (2026-02-01 19:58:50+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenu dans OpenStreetMap.
Le court de tennis ne s'appelle pas espace jo hocker mais :
Espace (avec une majouscule) Jo (Majuscule) Hocher (Majuscule et h, pas k).

De plus il y a 4 courts : 2, 3 et 4 pour les autres.
trial (2026-02-01 20:04:00+00:00): la piscine mérite un covered=yes, Si elle est de plain pied et non au dessus du bâtiment, le bâtiment doit l'exclure en créant un multipolygone.
trial (2026-02-01 20:07:17+00:00): Soit vous décrivez le bâtiment Espace Jo Hocher, soit (inclusif) les 4 courts.
Là vous avez fait un mélange, je ne connais pas de courte de tennis de cette forme.
jbcharron (2026-01-30 17:19:33+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci de prendre en compte nos retours
- amenity/education=college est a utilisé au lieu de university, réservé aux universités
- les numéros de téléphone doivent être au format international +33

Bonne soirée
Kees 59 (2026-01-31 09:58:41+00:00): Hallo Mediamen.

Zoals eggie eerder (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177844046) heeft gezegd worden in Nederland POIs normaal gesproken samengevoegd met de adres node.
Ik heb deze hier samengevoegd.

Feedback:
Gebaseerd op de website:
Zou dit niet eerder een amenity=restaurant zijn dan een amenity=bar?

Gebaseerd op de luchtfoto:
Het lijkt er op dat er een terras (tenminste in de zomer) aanwezig is. Zo ja dan zou outdoor_seating=yes van toepassing kunnen zijn.
Kees 59 (2026-01-31 10:00:30+00:00): Of eventueel leisure=outdoor_seating
Mediamen (2026-02-01 07:00:43+00:00): There is a terrace all year round, but also around the summer period and later they have sun lounger rental, which is particularly relaxing.
Leo Slager (2026-01-31 00:02:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-01-31 00:03:52+00:00): Dag Zooming_ghost,
Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan.
Je hebt hier nu ook alle adresgegevens van het gebouw van de kaart verwijderd.
Dat is natuurlijk niet de bedoeling.
In zal het adres weer even terug zetten.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-25 07:58:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1472654682/history

ta budowa też jest fikcyjna? czy ta akurat jest?
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:31:10+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13511809203 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Plumbing company"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:28:04+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257635
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
bxl-forever (2026-02-03 14:13:02+00:00): In version #3 of this road, a user surveyed this place and marked this road as complete (10/Dec/2025).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1436221934/history

In version #4, you changed it back to a road under construction.

Was the previous user wrong?
MaekDenis (2026-02-03 15:07:38+00:00): road is not yet open and is still under construction. No trafic authorized and no lighting yet. Stil heavy chipping and stones on the road as the work is not yet completed.
bxl-forever (2026-02-03 16:02:36+00:00): OK, thanks for this double check.  I’ll warn the other user that they added incorrect data to OSM, then.
A67-A67 (2026-02-21 01:00:05+00:00): You've created a duplicate. I'll remove it.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 12:10:13+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other mistagging for Lucid Private Offices POI in changeset 184691783

https://osm.org/changeset/184691783
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 12:10:19+00:00): Cleaned up mistagging for Lucid Private Offices POI in changeset 184691923

https://osm.org/changeset/184691923
willkmis (2026-01-30 12:29:20+00:00): Hi there, it seems like you might be using old imagery to make these changes? These are not zebra markings, they were correct before.
PedestrianMapping_MapTunnel (2026-02-03 07:05:27+00:00): Hi willkmis, Thanks for raising this concern.
The cross markings were updated based on Mapillary street-level imagery, which shows the current markings on the ground. You can view the imagery here:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1143989744267656&focus=photo&x=0.1168120457537612&y=0.5808055857781742&zoom=0.43181191399872715&lat=38.963070609756&lng=-77.101004000315&z=17

Thanks for checking!
willkmis (2026-02-03 13:18:09+00:00): OK thanks for looking into it. In the future if you use mapillary, it might help to put mapillary or street-level imagery in the changeset source
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 08:12:15+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam tags for The L.A. Law Firm POI in changeset 183767784

https://osm.org/changeset/183767784
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:31:11+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/13511865137 v1

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Wellness Center"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:28:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257637
(Cleaned up leftovers from previous edits)
Famlam (2026-02-07 19:37:15+00:00): Hoi! Welkom bij OSM. 

Betreffende je wijzigingen: het gebouw zelf is geen centrale, de centrale bevindt zich in het gebouw. De conventie in Nederland is dus ook om 'm te taggen op de adresnode (die _niet_ op het gebouw staat, maar erin).
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-12 15:27:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806028328/history

then abandoned:tram=yes likely should be changed into razed:tram=yes
Dan200 (2026-04-01 15:00:24+00:00): Apologies for this typo! These were indeed benches
Tramparam Parampampam (2026-01-30 20:37:51+00:00): i've agree. good job
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:31:13+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/1311275840 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Irrigation controller valve"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:28:06+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257638
(Restore previous tags)
NeisBot (2026-01-31 07:31:14+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

⚠️️ Problematic element (limit 1):
https://osm.org/node/4925736949 v2

Could you please revise your text accordingly?

✅ For example, a more neutral and factual version of your text could be: "Irrigation controller"

#MapWithoutSpam
NeisRevert (2026-02-08 09:28:07+00:00): 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/178257639
(Restore previous tags)
topius (2026-01-31 07:23:21+00:00): Nice that you are adding items from local knowledge. For hamlets, there is a correct tag: place=hamlet. I have added it.
Britzz (2026-02-03 09:11:48+00:00): Merci pour la mise à jour du site web communal, j'avais loupé cela en effet
Sakari_N (2026-06-29 15:12:52+00:00): Moi,

opening_hours tagilla on tietty syntaksi, jossa ajat pitäisi kirjoittaa. Ohjeita on wikissä paljon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours?uselang=en#Explanation_by_example

Eli kenttään ei voi vain kirjoittaa "maanantaista torstaihin kello 8-15" ja olettaa että kaikki maailman karttaohjelmat osaavat lukea tämän. (Korjailin näitä suomesta reilut kymmenen sinun tekemääsi, en jaksa nyt enempää...)
liljaadeliina (2026-07-24 11:46:25+00:00): Kiitos tuosta linkistä, korjailen niitä aina välillä oikeaan muotoon.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-27 12:10:27+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other mistagging for Lucid Private Offices POI in changeset 184691961

https://osm.org/changeset/184691961
Stalker61 (2026-02-04 05:49:43+00:00): Опять сломана маршрутизация? Может уже хватит вандалить данные?
Stalker61 (2026-02-04 05:46:32+00:00): По какому праву понижен статус автодороги?
Правку откатываю, как вандальную.
Eduardo17172 (2026-01-30 17:54:18+00:00): Hello, I couldn't find any information about "Rott Burger Fast Food" or its address. How did you find out about it?
bhmaps (2026-02-02 15:21:50+00:00): Sorry, seems my information was lost.
I was there, on this location, eating and drinlking. There is a Rott Burger besides a mini market.
I wad there at 21:45.
Eduardo17172 (2026-02-02 16:56:39+00:00): Thank you!
rhhs (2026-01-30 18:01:21+00:00): Hi, saw your good edits. I think it's good to keep (or add) name:bg=, see here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Repeating_name_with_language_specific_tag
If you want to link to a Wikipedia page of the organisation, you can use wikipedia=en:Bulgarian Red Cross (for instance). For etymology, you can use name:etymology:wikidata=Q219 (tag on бул. България) if you want to link to what the object is named after. And I think it should be short_name:en=BRC :)
Anonymous36863 (2026-01-31 13:19:08+00:00): OK, thanks for the advice, but I don't agree with short_name:en=BRC . https://duckduckgo.com/?q=bchk
rhhs (2026-01-31 15:34:36+00:00): If you transliterate the Bulgarian abbreviation to latin script, it would be BChK, but if you abbreviate the English name, it is BRC. BCHK is Bank of China (Hong Kong)... 
It's not very important though
Dimitar155 (2026-02-01 08:18:29+00:00): Please do not map police vehicles. This is not something that is permanently there.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177954204