piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-03-06 15:25:10+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, during the validation process
I noticed that you are a new mapper. Welcome to HOTOSM.
We cannot expect that you are already familiar with all issues around mapping. Therefore, I inform you about the most issues,

Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings are in general rather rectangular. Just 4, 6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Please map each building accurate over the rooflines.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Nodes of buildings may NOT  connect to other buildings or features.
The shadow of a building is not a part of the building. 
Do not cluster buildings. Each building need to be mapped individually.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132556051
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 15:56:39+00:00): Why you changed surface=grass to surface=turf?

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1060022115/history
antonr (2023-03-15 19:45:50+00:00): Hej Niels,

Node 10659799422 ser sær ud for mig:
- er både bus_stop og stop_position (måske kun stop_position?)
- hedder "Vinten (Horsens Kom)", og er placeret ud for eksisterende stop der hedder "Bygholm Bakker (Horsens Kom)". Skal der ikke være højst ét unikt navn lige her?

Mvh
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-03-20 15:20:38+00:00): Jo, Midttrafik kalder det
"Bygholm Bakker/Silkeborgvej"

Så det har jeg ændret dem til.
antonr (2023-03-20 16:05:57+00:00): Hvad med bus_stop og stop_position på samme node? Er det virkelig meningen? Det virker som en sær kombi og ikke noget jeg kan finde dokumentation for på wikien. 

Wikien skriver forøvrigt også om stop_position at den i det hele taget er "... usually unnecessary." [1]

Min opfattelse af god bus-praksis er: hw=bus_stop ved siden af vejen, og eventuelt(!) pt=stop_position på vejen. Ingen blanding.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses
aTarom (2023-03-16 17:29:16+00:00): Hola Armanbikes,
gracias por editar,
los nombres como
"name"="Armanbikes"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145447577/history
deberían etiquetarse con el
"mtb:name"
solo así se mantiene ordenado con las otras mtb:... y no se confunden con los nombres oficiales, locales, históricos...
dispones de más información en la wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking

Saludos cordiales
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-14 22:20:27+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1138970817

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-13 12:35:57+00:00): Hello!

You used
reservation=none
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10659812485/history

Have you maybe meant
reservation=no
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Scout Jens (2023-02-15 07:27:39+00:00): Benutzung mit dem Rad nicht erlaubt?
george1201 (2023-02-15 07:45:51+00:00): Zumindest nicht verboten. Ich wollte hier zunächst alle Wege einheitlich setzen. Dieser eine ist mit highway=cycleway aus der Reihe gefallen. Schilder stehen da nicht. Dass es ein Fussweg ist, ergibt sich aus dem äußeren Anschein (Wiki sagt "durch die bauliche Gestaltung erkennbar"). Solange kein "nur Fußgänger"-Schild da steht, dürfen dann auch Fahrräder durch (auch Pferde, aber das träge ich nicht ein :-). Die bicycle-Erlaubnis sollte man dann an all diesen Wegen setzen.
george1201 (2023-02-15 07:47:43+00:00): Ich finde die Unterscheidung schwierig. Wann "cycleway + foot=yes", wann "footway + bicycle=yes"?
Scout Jens (2023-02-15 08:57:35+00:00): cycleway ist mit Benutzungspflicht. Dazu sollte ein Schild stehen. Aber einfach ist es nicht, da stimme ich Dir zu
george1201 (2023-02-15 22:10:35+00:00): Wenn Schilder da stehen, ist alles klar. Aber wenn man weder Gebots- noch Verbotsschilder hat? Dass es ein Fußweg ist, ist offensichtlich. Aber darf man hier auch radfahren? Wege parallel neben einer Straße sind "Bürgersteige". Hier gilt Radfahrverbot, auch wenn kein Schild da ist. Klar. Aber wenn der Weg quer durch Wohnbebauung geht? Also ein schwieriges Thema. Weil in diesem Gebiet schon viele Wege mit "footway" getaggt sind, behalte ich das erst mal bei. Ein bicycle=yes setze ich nur dann, wenn ich vermute, dass man hier als Radfahrer nicht schief angesehen wird oder gar einen Strafzettel riskiert.
Scout Jens (2023-02-16 15:20:32+00:00): Ja, es ist schwierig. Aber so, wie Du es schreibst, passt es für mich.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-14 22:20:28+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145448499

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
user_5359 (2023-02-15 06:30:18+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Kannst Du bitte den Sinn dieser Tagkombination
building = yes
demolished:building = yes
beim Polo Store Köln erklären?
topolusitania (2023-02-17 11:21:38+00:00): Boa tarde ADPALMELENSE.
Toda a tua edição foi apagada, pois criaste uma enorme rua que não existe e nalguns locais ficou completamente sobreposta a ruas já existentes.
Não percebi o que pretendeste fazer nesta tua 1a edição, por isso a apaguei.
Por favor não alteres nada se não tiveres a certeza absoluta do que pretendes fazer.
Cumprimentos
TL
archpdx (2023-02-22 03:31:43+00:00): Please note that we cannot copy off of Google Maps, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?
osmviborg (2023-02-15 14:54:33+00:00): GeoDanmark mener det er en halvø. https://vis.dataforsyningen.dk/steder/1233766a-0fbe-6b98-e053-d480220a5a3f
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-02-15 17:00:06+00:00): Men de viser også at halvøen følger kysten på den del, som ikke mod land.

Den vej som havde natural=peninsula tagget, var slet ikke nærheden af kysten.
user_18305684 (2023-02-15 13:41:02+00:00): Hi,

there are 2 ways Ouro Branco with the same tags : please remove one.

Best regards
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-15 00:00:52+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2604109759
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2604105643
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2604115059
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2604115058
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2604115057
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838453866
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185435324
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185435371
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283158505

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227586944
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231372263
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/998705088
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017333560
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145464487

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o miejscowości.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173486241
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771143700
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965331421
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965331468

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443519476

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
osmuser63783 (2024-01-07 21:07:12+00:00): Hi I'm reviewing objects tagged amenity=lounge. The tag is predominantly used for airport lounges and similar, so I've created a Wiki page for it. Does the "Fidel Lounge" fit the description or is there maybe a better tag for it?
zhik (2023-02-15 23:49:35+00:00): Hey! Thanks for adding sidewalks. 

It seems you moved a node for the building and caused it to be misshaped. I have correct the issue!
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-16 01:56:03+00:00): Please use "q" to straighten the buildings and put it at right angles.
julcnx (2023-02-15 02:46:45+00:00): Morning. why would you remove English name translations? These "name:en" are important and should not be removed. If the translations are incorrect, please simply replace their values.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132559560
Irfandi IRM-ED (2023-02-15 07:11:04+00:00): Morning, cmoffroad. I apologized for removed name:en for this highway. I thought when I deleted it was, the name:en and name:thai already written on key bridge:name: as สะพานเขลางค์. And name for the road is ถนน ท่ามะโอ. In my opinion bridge:name has different value with name, because sometimes name of the road where the bridge lays on it, is different with name of the bridge. Do you mind if I decide to put name:en back as Tha Mao Road (I tried to translated it) instead of Khelang Bridge?
Your answer will be helpful, thank you so much for correcting me.
user_18305684 (2023-02-15 13:41:36+00:00): Hi,

for the borders of a boundary, the roles have to be "outer", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary#Relation_members
I fixed the relations
Best regards
adrianojbr (2023-02-15 17:42:00+00:00): Olá, serlus!

Praticamente tudo certo, a única ressalva é que as áreas (praça, por exemplo) não devem se conectar às vias, como no caso da próxima à Rua Otto Stein.

Abraço!
adrianojbr (2023-02-15 17:46:52+00:00): Olá, serlus!

Algumas observações:

1. Vias não devem receber nome descritivo;

2. Como é trilha, highway=path é mais indicado;

3. leisure=sports_centre é para áreas fechadas, o que não sei se é o caso aqui. Talvez leisure=pitch seja mais adequada; e

4. Nome e Operador normalmente são escritos com iniciais em maiúsculas.

Abraço!
adrianojbr (2023-02-15 17:35:48+00:00): Olá, serlus!

Se possível, é interessante acrescentar as modalidades esportivas praticadas, conforme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sport

Abraço!
GOwin (2023-02-15 08:46:12+00:00): Great edit! Thank you.
user_8655426 (2023-02-15 10:59:13+00:00): こんにちは。 ＆ POIの更新、ありがとうございます。 ＆ お帰りなさい！

地物につけるタグには「書式」があるもんで、なるべくそれに従うようお願いいたします。

・JA:Key:cuisine
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:cuisine?uselang=ja

・JA:Key:opening_hours
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:opening%20hours?uselang=ja

idエディタのタグ入力欄にある "i" (情報)をクリックすると、そのタグの簡単な説明を見ることが出来ます。さらに「ドキュメントを見る」をクリックすると、 Wiki のページで詳細なタグづけ方法などを確認することが出来ます。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132561337
Frans S (2023-02-16 15:58:33+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Use the correct Imagery. Maxar instead of Bing.

A few remarks about the way you map highways.
In 1 occasion you mapped a road straight forward through buildings and ending in farmland (without any trace of a road.
Please be more accurate.
You tag them as living-street, which is to be used as traffic free streets in urban areas.  
Here, you can choose Unclassified or residential.
See this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132561386
Frans S (2023-02-16 16:26:13+00:00): Continue comments:

Your mapping quality is below par.
Please be more accurate in following the rooflines.
Don't include a courtyard, and the shadow into your mapping.
Square each rectangular building with the Q key .
Don't collect multiple buildings as 1 building.

I invalidate this task. Please correct your mappings.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132561386
emersonveenstra (2023-02-15 14:45:06+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your contributions, as a note phone numbers must have the international prefix (+1 for US), would you mind fixing this? Thanks! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10660307773
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-02-15 12:45:04+00:00): Hi! Thanks for adding addresses. When there is an entrance=home/shop/main tag on the building, please put the addr tags on the entrance instead of the building. Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-02-16 13:44:15+00:00): You do not have to specify entrances if you draw new buildings, but when the entrance has been already added, it is preferable to put the addr tag on the entrance itself, because a lot of buildings have multiple addresses at distinct doors/entrances. In this region, every residential building with at least 3 flats have been drawn already with entrances, but they may be missing addresses. However, we will import the addresses very soon from official sources, so you may let the addr tags empty in the meantime.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-15 19:23:59+00:00): Please use better changeset comments.  What does "ccc" mean?  What did you do?  Why did you delete items?
marczoutendijk (2023-02-15 20:00:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6863
watmildon (2023-02-16 01:19:52+00:00): Hello! I've stood up an address addition project that may interest you. https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/377

I'm not local to AZ so would love any feedback you have. Some areas will already have been completed but there does appear to be a lot of work I'm excited to get through.

Anyhow, happy mapping either way!
Dr Kludge (2023-02-17 04:56:14+00:00): In addition to the task project that you have setup, there are some other projects that cover just the City of Phoenix.  I have not updated areas recently.  These do not cover the reset of the Metro Phoenix area.  There is plenty of mapping to do.
https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/73
https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/77
https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/78
https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/79
https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/80
https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/81

I apply postal_code tags to the streets once I have completed an area.  You can see both the buildings that have been addressed and the streets that have a postal code at the geofagrik map here. I only apply the postal_code tag once the street has been aligned and surface tags have been applied.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-112.02871&lat=33.53918&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=buildings%2Cbuildings_with_addresses%2Cpostal_code%2Centrances_deprecated%2Centrances%2Cno_addr_street%2Cstreet_not_found%2Cplace_not_found%2Cmisformatted_housenumber_lenient%2Cnodes_with_addresses_defined%2Cnodes_with_addresses_interpolated%2Cinterpolation%2Cinterpolation_errors%2Cconnection_lines%2Cnearest_points%2Cnearest_roads%2Cnearest_areas%2Caddrx_on_nonclosed_way
Dr Kludge (2023-02-17 04:58:19+00:00): The geofabrik map has about a 12 to 24 hour update rate depending on when your changeset was applied to the map.
watmildon (2023-02-18 00:57:44+00:00): Awesome. Good to know. I'm not sure why I didn't even search the Task Manager for AZ before making a thing but fortunately, it seems the projects are somewhat orthogonal. 

Also good reminder for me to keep an eye on OSMI. I'm not sure we can get it completely happy all the time but it's always good to know we aren't leaving huge messes.

If we end up stepping on your work please let me know. It seems the 3 of us are mostly way way way out of the city at this point so there's low chance of immediate collision!
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-22 05:42:33+00:00): You could always just change the end bit to a driveway and set "Access=private"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132562117
BlazarMatt (2023-02-23 09:47:20+00:00): Thanks for the tip, I've added the node back as service road / driveway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132562117
Baloo Uriza (2023-02-16 00:19:55+00:00): I appreciate the sense of humor, but a little bit more descriptiveness in the comments would be more helpful.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132562285
ovruni (2023-02-15 05:10:29+00:00): Hola, no existe la etiqueta Longitud, por favor revisar la documentación sobre la clave de longitud.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:length
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-18 07:41:19+00:00): Please do not add non-existent features.  This changeset is being reverted.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-18 07:41:53+00:00): Reverted in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132704593

User has been referred to DWG.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-18 07:45:05+00:00): You can press "q" when editing to square buildings and other features.

Also, please spend a little more time to trace the buildings.  The idea is to have quality data.
Sree1922 (2023-02-15 04:13:17+00:00): MML Orthophoto
aTarom (2023-02-15 07:12:26+00:00): Hola, AgusOrux,
gracias por editar,
sabes si la cueva es de origen natural o no? es para corregir el tag
"cave "="entrance"
por
"man_made"="cave_entrance"
ó
"natural"="cave_entrance"

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10660400688/history

Saludos
Warin61 (2023-02-16 00:30:22+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

Muiltpolygons are one of the harder things to understand. The one you have made here is not correct. see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15479996. 

The firest meber https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/871161920 encompasses the whole lake the other ways simply duplicate segments of this way. Best to keep the map as simple as possible, that would be done bt tagging https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/871161920 as a lake, then deleting the other member ways in the relation and then the relation it self. \
For more info on multipolygon relations read the OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Keep mapping .. lots to do.
Ian Chennell (2023-02-16 01:16:57+00:00): Many thanks - I knew I hadn't got this lake boundary quite right, as I tried to combine two separate lake polygons into one... Easiest fix was to delete and redraw the lake as a single object.
mavl (2023-02-15 04:37:39+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 132533871, 132534031, 132534076, 132534401, 132534867, 132534880, 132540877, 132541260, 132548580, 132551029, 132551553, 132551892, 132551949, 132552080, 132552578.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-16 01:59:21+00:00): This changeset is being reverted.  Please do not add non-existent cartpaths to the map.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Sree1922 (2023-02-15 06:05:04+00:00): MML Orthophoto
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-16 01:54:10+00:00): Please do not add non-existent cartpaths over correct and existing roadways.
NorthCrab_upload (2023-02-15 06:20:20+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2699690688
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8067014299

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Patr1k_P (2023-02-16 12:02:22+00:00): tu restauraciu ste dali duplikovane aj do budovy
Patr1k_P (2023-02-16 12:09:27+00:00): k comu je dobre pridavat duplikovane adresy?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10660540867

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10660540866
DP24PH (2023-02-16 08:50:03+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Here is our courtesy notice: Kindly reduce your changeset boundary to a per-country basis in order to avoid interfering with the local editors across Asia-Pacific Region. For more information, go to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset.


DP24
wlofa (2023-02-17 00:08:14+00:00): oke
aharvey (2023-03-24 05:10:02+00:00): access=private means it's not legal even on foot, which is very rare in National Parks, did you mean motor_vehicle=private which implies authorised vehicles only but walkers may still access it?
ITBeyond-Michelle (2023-03-24 05:13:45+00:00): don't believe I modified the access tag on this one
aharvey (2023-03-24 13:25:15+00:00): See https://osmcha.org/changesets/132567680/ or for example this way https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/266742611

You added access=private, which per my comment would exclude walkers. I'm not familiar with this area but I'd be surprised if that was the case, likely it is just motor_vehicle=private?
Josuer (2023-03-02 16:49:29+00:00): Hola JeSe,
En esté conjunto de cambios agregaste un Secondary link (https://www.openstreetmap.org/vía/1145573442) que une las vias laterales de la av. 5 de febrero sin embargo marca un error de ruteo porque pasa por los carriles centrales sin ningún nodo que conecte o con una etiqueta de tunnel o puente. le podrías echar un vistazo? 
Muchas Gracias.
Josuer (2023-03-02 16:55:38+00:00): Mismo caso para los links que están mas al sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145573441 y https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145573443 supongo que están construyendo un paso a desnivel y falta agregar bridge=yes layer =1 no?
JeSe-MX (2023-03-03 17:52:31+00:00): hola, buenas tardes.

Sí, lo hice de rápido mientras transitaba por el lugar.

El asunto es que la autopista, o centrales de 5 de Febrero están siendo modificadas, pero continuarán en ése lugar.
Los puentes fueron removidos, y aún continúan en obra (tal ves por más de un año). Y se han habilitado retornos (los que puse) que literalmente atraviesan los centrales.
Sólo uní los laterales y olvidé pasar por cada vía central. No existen puentes para estos retornos, estan a nivel de calle.

Ya lo corrijo más tarde.

gracias.
literan (2023-02-15 17:14:51+00:00): включил
Sylvain M (2024-07-17 08:50:33+00:00): Do you know what species the remarkable tree you mapped is ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10660683380
Cascafico (2024-07-17 10:46:03+00:00): Sorry, I can't remember
Mwuah (2023-02-15 07:47:18+00:00): Funny