piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ielenia (2026-06-20 03:46:26+00:00): Looks good to me! I noticed that it was a waterway=ditch but I guess I misread the wiki, waterway=canal is likely more accurate here since it's for irrigation.
Ielenia (2026-06-20 04:00:51+00:00): Looks good.
Ielenia (2026-06-20 04:31:51+00:00): Looks OK
Ielenia (2026-06-20 04:34:30+00:00): Looks good!
Ielenia (2026-06-20 04:56:03+00:00): Looks OK to me
Ielenia (2026-06-20 04:55:49+00:00): Looks good, probably should be converted to an area for the whole parking area if possible in the future
Ielenia (2026-06-20 04:56:33+00:00): Thanks for all your edits! Everything looks all good with this one.
FajrAl (2026-06-10 04:56:12+00:00): Perlu diketahui bahwa OpenStreetMap itu berbeda dengan Google Maps. Selain itu, Syarat & Ketentuan Google juga melarang data mereka dijadikan sebagai acuan referensi atau sumber.
Ahmad Rivaldi (2026-06-10 05:14:05+00:00): my bad, maaf atas ketidaktahuan saya.  
Saya merevisinya berdasarkan orang lokal sana biasanya nyebut Jl. Maja Raya / Jl. Raya Maja
FajrAl (2026-06-10 07:16:16+00:00): Iya, saya juga tadi lihat riwayatnya: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469589319/history awalnya Jalan Raya Maja.
Wildsharky (2026-06-15 12:14:01+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset id:184007322
Fizzie-DWG (2026-06-10 04:43:36+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20785
pwbriggs (2026-06-10 19:20:25+00:00): Thanks. Do you know what bus routes stop here now? Looks like route 109 is nearby, anything else? Any Sound Transit buses? I'd love to try to get the bus routes to reflect this new P&R.

Thanks again for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Kyle282842 (2026-06-10 19:37:33+00:00): Good question. Bus service to this park and ride is anticipated to begin August 30th 2026 starting with Community Transit route 109. Additional routes expected to be added later along with the possibility for Swift line extension. Some info with additional links and resources here: https://www.snohomishcountywa.gov/3944/Cathcart-South-Property-2018
pwbriggs (2026-06-10 19:46:05+00:00): Okay, thanks!
Glassman (2026-06-11 17:17:03+00:00): The ways you tagged as highway=unclassified look more like highway=service. unclassified is basically a rural residential road. Can you review this?

Also, the area ou tagged as amenity=bus_station, is that just a parking lot for people taking the bus?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183902034
Fizzie-DWG (2026-07-29 05:41:24+00:00): DWG revert - fix incorrect tagging from undiscussed import

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186562886
橘ヒカリ (2026-06-12 23:18:51+00:00): Reverted in 184036085
iuvi (2026-06-12 15:52:59+00:00): Добрый день! Как то вы троллейбусный маршрут странно обозначили. Нужно отдельно делать маршрута из А в Б и потом из Б в А, и объединять их в мастер маршрут. После нововведений с 1 июля поправлю как появится время

У вас мне показалось остановки с двух сторон выделенны в единую ветку
Ruslan Fatih (2026-06-13 09:39:29+00:00): Добрый день. Боюсь, что вы ошиблись. Я не трогал маршруты общественного транспорта.
scrambling_panda (2026-06-11 17:55:05+00:00): Hi!

Dreamstate’s a bit of a difficult case, where it both fits what you would call a “cafe” and definitely could be called a restaurant. Since all other tags would be the same between the two, I don’t think we want separate nodes in this case.

I’ve removed the separate node added in this changeset and added cafe=yes, as well as cuisine=coffee_shop in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183983461

Hopefully that captures the situation well!
Annlake8 (2026-06-12 02:39:30+00:00): Sounds good - Thanks for reviewing the submission!
scrambling_panda (2026-06-12 03:59:50+00:00): Of course! Thank you for the contribution. Hopefully this doesn’t deter you! You were still making the map better, I’m just nitpicking about the best way to make it better :)
bagis (2026-06-10 05:06:14+00:00): Changeset comment should be "Adjust website".
Facalderonm (2026-06-16 02:19:18+00:00): Hola Barto. La AK 9 desde la AC 183 hasta la AC 192, aunque sea una vía de 2-3 carriles, actualmente no conecta con ninguna avenida primaria (tag: primary) al norte ni tiene continuidad por ese extremo. Puesto que conecta con avenida secundaria (tag:secundary), lo natural sería que se le asignara dicha categoría en ese mismo tramo, no uno superior. Esto sucede en otras vías de Bogotá que no tienen continuidad como la Av. Cali, la CL 170, la AK 10, etc. Recordar que OSM tiene como uno de sus principios mapear con lo actual, en terreno, y no con lo que a futuro pueda ocurrir.
OddlyAngled (2026-06-11 20:51:57+00:00): I moved this name to the description tag in 183989838
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-12 11:25:04+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and other tags for POI in changeset 184012408

https://osm.org/changeset/184012408
橘ヒカリ (2026-06-12 23:29:27+00:00): Reverted in 184036249
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183905403
V11 ARENA (2026-06-24 00:54:34+00:00): Alguma possibilidade de disponibilizar esse local no Instagram / Facebook ?
Tbj (2026-06-10 06:24:14+00:00): erreur de nom : devrait être : Nominatim QA : Suspicious addr:street tag (Bruyère d'Hulencourt) + some josm validations
Mevess (2026-06-10 14:19:14+00:00): Bonjour,
Le producteur de miel Maison Vergnon a-t-il déménagé ? Est-il fermé ?
Merci
Mevess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183905713
Shohreh (2026-06-10 14:39:12+00:00): Les deux sont à la même adresse et j'ai supposé que l'un avait remplacé l'autre, mais j'aurais effectivement plutôt dû ajouter un fixme… ce qui est fait
Mevess (2026-06-11 05:28:18+00:00): corrigé dans 183952996, le noeud du magasin de vélo reste à localiser
ygcgjp5 (2026-06-21 11:45:30+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas (išskyrus prie Circle K degalinės), kintamos informacijos ženklai nekeičia įprasto greičio ribojimo žemėlapyje, kai sudės tikrus ženklus - tada ir bus galima keisti. Taip pat siūlyčiau pasikartoti greičio ribojimų galiojimo taisykles, nes puse kilometro viršyta net ir žiūrint pagal kintamus ženklus...
mavl (2026-06-11 10:25:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183964099 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20794].
mavl (2026-06-10 06:18:09+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 183251541, 183251735, 183251788, 183252671, 183252745, 183257038, 183261887, 183262090, 183262695, 183262777, 183424260, 183424336, 183424350, 183424369, 183424520, 183424590, 183499265, 183622886, 183658931, 183659014, 183659210, 183659278, 183659455, 183659558, 183672808, 183672889, 183673120, 183673306, 183673512, 183673546, 183673666, 183673926, 183673984, 183674031, 183674094, 183725428.
turbopixel (2026-06-11 18:14:58+00:00): Hallo, die Änderung war ganz gut. Ich habe diese um ein paar Details erweitert. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183984445
Senihtu (2026-06-11 10:55:50+00:00): Hallo!
Kannst Du Dir Node 8224276165 ('platform' Mathildenplatz) nochmal ansehen?
Eine Plattform mit Sitzgelegenheit und Häuschen befindet sich eher nicht auf dem Fahrweg.
Grüße 
Senihtu
Lordofmist (2026-06-16 06:38:29+00:00): Moin,
Ich glaube bei den Stufen auf dem Friedensplatz sollte der area=yes tag bestehen bleiben (z.B. way/984260072). Oder besser noch area:highway=steps.
mavl (2026-06-11 10:25:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183964099 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20794].
yassin_metro (2026-06-16 13:16:15+00:00): Can you please explain the under construction road here? Thank you
salma_z (2026-06-16 13:43:34+00:00): Hello yassin_metro,
Looking at the previous history of this area, the mapper before me 
https://osmcha.org/changesets/183877232
had uploaded the street with only the construction tag, which goes against OSM tagging guidelines.
According to the official documentation, it must be tagged as:
highway=construction
construction=* (e.g., construction=residential, construction=tertiary, etc.)

You can check the correct tagging standards here: OSM Wiki - Tag:highway=construction. I only stepped in to fix these validation errors, as we shouldn't leave incomplete tags on the map.
Additionally, the elements you recently drew are also incorrect because they create overlaps and contain incomplete tags:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1529976945
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1529976942

Could you please fix the tags on these segments and remove the overlapping ways? Thank you!
Regards,
salma_z
mavl (2026-06-10 06:27:42+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 183839212, 183856829, 183859522, 183903482, 183903841.
MappingMore (2026-06-12 10:30:32+00:00): Reverted in changeset ID:184010167
langoor (2026-06-10 09:26:01+00:00): ilya0112, зачем Вы меняете существующие дороги, на которых не ведется работ, на строящиеся/ремонтируемые?
dknelson9876 (2026-06-13 22:53:15+00:00): Hi viktoryia, please do not use TIGER as a source for road names in Utah. TIGER did a horrible job of handling our multiple street names and the local community has put in a lot of effort to clean up the mess. Specifically in this case, note that the full street name "East Kennedy Drive" was already captured in name:full=* according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventions. Additionally, name_1=* has been deprecated and should not be used, according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Deprecated_tags
viktoryia fedarava (2026-06-23 07:12:33+00:00): Hello, dknelson9876! Thanks for your comment and the feedback.  I will take this into account when working on similar cases in the future.
Best regards, viktoryia fedarava.
mavl (2026-06-11 10:25:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183964099 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20794].
b-jazz (2026-06-12 18:42:39+00:00): FYI, this action was the wrong thing to do. See this wiki for an explanation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID_understanding_golf_course_relations
mavl (2026-06-10 06:44:30+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 183251541, 183251735, 183251788, 183252671, 183252745, 183257038, 183261887, 183262090, 183262695, 183262777, 183424260, 183424336, 183424350, 183424369, 183424520, 183424590, 183499265, 183622886, 183658931, 183659014, 183659210, 183659278, 183659455, 183659558, 183672808, 183672889, 183673120, 183673306, 183673512, 183673546, 183673666, 183673926, 183673984, 183674031, 183674094, 183725428, 183839212, 183856829, 183859522, 183903482, 183903841.
mavl (2026-06-11 03:02:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183950204 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20791].
literan (2026-06-10 19:21:35+00:00): перестаньте это делать
FajrAl (2026-06-10 07:10:17+00:00): Ikuti dulu tutorial interaktif di editornya
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-21 18:00:34+00:00): Hi EMU800,

I just wanted to give you a ping that @Formosa%20Topo removed the station tags you added to the buildings "鐵博西站號" in changeset 186101268. I reverted their changes as it was explicitly sourced from Google Maps and didn't appear to be discussed, but I wanted to give you a ping so you could discuss it with them on that changeset if desired.

https://osm.org/changeset/186101268

Thanks, and happy mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-10 08:17:02+00:00): #Spam
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-10 08:17:25+00:00): Corrected by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183908312
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-13 06:24:06+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/954203537

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Leo Slager (2026-06-10 21:28:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2026-06-10 21:32:23+00:00): Hallo Ben-X,

Het is goed om te weten dat in NL gebouwen en adressen rechtstreeks worden geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG van het Kadaster.
De adressen staan dan op een aparte node.
Dus niet op de omtrek van het gebouw.

Veel plezier met verder mappen.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-06-13 06:24:02+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy. Adres można oznaczyć na dwa sposoby: na obszarze (dokładniejsze) albo na punkcie. Aktualizując adres, należy się upewnić, czy w okolicy nie pozostały żadne duplikaty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13925516011
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/803481889

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
fortera_au (2026-06-10 23:49:42+00:00): Hi, if those are buildings, you've removed that from being marked. Landuse would be for the surrounding area, not for the individual buildings. You'd want to tag those as building=apartments.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183908589
jrOSM (2026-06-11 07:05:52+00:00): Thank you @fortera_au. Can you please advise how I can have a block of flats and then also denote which unit number it is? When I tried making the building=apartments and then putting houses over the top, I got a warning saying houses and buildings are overlapping.
fortera_au (2026-06-11 07:21:43+00:00): If you want to just specify which units are in one whole building, you'd just put the range (I.e. 1-3) in the unit part. Otherwise, one option would just to put nodes where each unit is and just put the address in for each one, with no other details.
mavl (2026-06-11 14:36:14+00:00): Здравствуйте. Эта линия точно не пешеходная дорожка, а именно её восточная часть:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1528072448/history
Titova Kseniya (2026-06-22 11:54:40+00:00): Добрый день, вы оставляли комментарий к моим правкам. Не совсем поняла, как необходимо исправить дорожку 1528072448 ? присвоить path?
mavl (2026-06-22 12:28:15+00:00): Я уже исправил. Можно ничего не делать.
IpswichEdits (2026-06-11 10:32:17+00:00): Hi @eteb3! I totally understand your reasons for removing the sidewalk ways, as you explained it in your changeset comment. However I notice that all the surrounding roads have their sidewalks mapped separately. Perhaps it would be better to reinstate the sidewalks and instead remove the tagging from the main Argyle Street way instead, just for consistency with the surrounding area? Just a thought. Thanks for considering. :-)
eteb3 (2026-06-11 14:17:35+00:00): I removed them because I understood tagging as a property of the main way was the preferred standard in this part of the world (there was mention of Uber adding sidewalks unhelpfully in London recently). 

From your handle I assume you're active in Ipswich and I'm happy to defer to you if there is preferred local practice. I would have thought consistency across the UK may be better, but I'm no sidewalk expert so again, happy to follow your steer.

The only thing I'd check is that your proposal doesn't amount to tagging for the renderer: the fact that nearby streets have sidewalks as separate ways, and the consistency looks attractive to the eye, doesn't make it good mapping (though it may be good mapping for other reasons). 

Your thoughts on that?
MappingMore (2026-06-11 11:02:25+00:00): Reverted in changeset ID:183965446
Piskvor (2026-06-10 20:45:01+00:00): Zdravim, adresni misto podle RUIAN stale existuje: https://vdp.cuzk.gov.cz/vdp/ruian/adresnimista/22455698 Vracim zpet.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183943280
mini-me (2026-06-10 12:35:45+00:00): Ни один вменяемый роутер не будет делать такие развороты. Такое ограничение нужно если дорога нарисована двумя линиями, либо в местах, где эти линии сходятся в одну.
Максим Баранаускас (2026-06-11 06:59:44+00:00): Здравствуйте! То есть, такие манёвры можно не запрещать?
mini-me (2026-06-11 07:20:29+00:00): Да. Вы можете проверять как строится маршрут прямо на openstreetmap.org Правой кнопкой мыши на карте > Маршрут отсюда / Маршрут сюда
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=59.938863%2C30.362295%3B59.940407%2C30.363582#map=17/59.939663/30.364773
Bo Lindbergh (2026-07-15 23:23:56+00:00): Detta ser märkligt ut. Gång- och cykelbron över Hägernäs station har väl inte plötsligt slutat vara bro?
teeuwen (2026-06-10 08:12:31+00:00): Hi Gunjee,

Thanks for contributing lane information for UB. I noticed you've been uploading many small changesets in quick succession. Could you please group related edits into a single changeset instead? It makes the history easier to review and reduces noise for other mappers. You can also read about this on the Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets. Thanks!

- asloma
teeuwen (2026-06-10 08:12:26+00:00): Hi Gunjee,

Thanks for contributing lane information for UB. I noticed you've been uploading many small changesets in quick succession. Could you please group related edits into a single changeset instead? It makes the history easier to review and reduces noise for other mappers. You can also read about this on the Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets. Thanks!

- asloma
teeuwen (2026-06-10 08:12:19+00:00): Hi Gunjee,

Thanks for contributing lane information for UB. I noticed you've been uploading many small changesets in quick succession. Could you please group related edits into a single changeset instead? It makes the history easier to review and reduces noise for other mappers. You can also read about this on the Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets. Thanks!

- asloma
Senihtu (2026-06-11 10:49:25+00:00): Hallo!
Kannst Du Dir Linie 13 nochmal ansehen? Bei PTv2 gibt es keine Role  forward_ oder backward_stop.
Da die Routen eine Richtung haben, wird als role nur stop eingetragen. Das ist dann logisch eine Vorwärts-Haltestelle.
Ein backward_stop gehört in die Relation der Gegenrichtung.
Grüße 
Senihtu
Herwescheluc (2026-06-11 19:53:18+00:00): Hallo, Senhitu,

habe jetzt alle 5 Änderungen (von mir) rückgängig gemacht. Habe ich dabei nichts übersehen?

Mir ging's um diese (https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=14&lat=50.67854&lon=8.30476&item=1260%2C2140&level=1%2C2%2C3&loc=12/50.56757/8.52411) Hinweise in OSMOSE.

Nach dieser Disk (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/busrouten-mit-network-network-short-network-long-undiskutiertes-massen-tag/144156) hat der Mapper leider nicht auf meinen Hinweis zu den seinetwegen aufgestiegenen Ballons reagiert.

Du weißt ja: Hinweise jeder Art prüfe ich und bemühe mich, die alsbald abzuarbeiten. Im Zuge der Wiederumbenennung in network=Rhein-Main-Verkehrsverbund habe ich dann versucht, es selbst zu erledigen.

Vielleicht hätte ich gleich Dich fragen sollen, ob Du Dir die gesamte Situation mal ansehen und helfen kannst, die zu bearbeiten oder mir Hinweise gibst, was ich wirklich ändern kann?

Viele Grüße aus Herborn

Andreas
Senihtu (2026-06-15 14:14:20+00:00): Hi!
Die Antwort kommt etwas spät - mal wieder das Privatleben :-)

Bei der betreffenden Linie kann ich keine Fehler mehr finden - aber auch ich bin nicht allwissend.

Die Diskussion um network habe ich mitgelesen. Da ich dazu aber nichts sinnvolles beitragen konnte, habe ich geschwiegen.
So viele Gedanken wie Du hatte ich mir um dieses Tag noch nicht gemacht.

Zur Fehlersuche nutze ich https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/HE/DE-HE-RMV-Analysis.diff.html.
Dem Tool ist es egal, ob da Rhein-Main-Verkehrsverbund oder RMV steht - solange da nicht rmmv steht...

Wenn Du Aufgaben suchst: derzeit werden überall in Hessen die Bushaltestellen barrierefrei umgebaut.
Wenn das erfolgt ist, dann kann man auf dem Luftbild - oder natürlich auch vor Ort - erkennen, wo die stop_position ist
(Da auf den Fahrweg, wo der vordere weiße Streifen der taktilen Pflasterung hinzeigt.).
Das kann man einzeichnen und in die PTV2-Busrelationen aufnehmen.
Bei Linie 13 werde ich heute mal suchen gehen.

Grüße aus Frankfurt
Senihtu
mini-me (2026-06-10 13:23:51+00:00): Эта дорога ремонтируется? Откуда вы взяли эту информацию?
Leo Slager (2026-06-10 21:37:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Leo
Namens de OSM Community
mavl (2026-06-11 03:02:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183950204 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20791].
surveyor54 (2026-06-10 16:16:31+00:00): Hallo Oliver Lüpke,
bist du sicher, dass hier highway=unclassified angebracht ist?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=unclassified

Gruß
surveyor54
pitscheplatsch (2026-06-10 10:19:25+00:00): #Spam ?
bxl-forever (2026-06-10 21:47:41+00:00): Aerial imagery suggests there is a large building here. This building was mapped as a hotel.

The user removed the building tags and the hotel-related tags, to turn it into a large landuse area with their own business name.

I restored the deleted hotel.

SEO agency mapped as a node here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13927296527
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-10 22:32:09+00:00): You're nicer than I would be, doing it for them @bxl-forever -- I personally would have just reverted and let them recreate it properly themselves, especially since I'm not sure that it even exists on the ground here.
Snapi Media (2026-06-12 11:44:20+00:00): Hello,

Snapi Media is a legitimate business and not spam. Our office is located in the same building area as the hotel. We did not intend to replace or remove the hotel listing. If our mapping was incorrect, we would appreciate guidance on the proper way to map our office while keeping the hotel information intact.

Thank you.
bxl-forever (2026-06-12 12:05:37+00:00): Hello, Snapi Media.

Thanks for your explanation.

The fix has already been implemented, and explained in the previous comments.

1. Do not touch the hotel (which you inadvertently removed to replace it entirely with your own agency). → We restored Lahore Hotel to its previous state.

2. Add a simple floating point for Snapi Media, with its name, business type and some contact details (website, phone number). We also did this, and I provided the reference of the node in the previous message. Here it is again: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13927296527

What you can do is: add more relevant information, perhaps the opening hours of your business, or you can move the node to a more accurate location within the building, to help your visitors.  And if you upload data to the map, make sure to provide a honest description of your changes, not something that sounds like advertisement.

Have a nice day.