piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LySioS (2023-05-15 22:34:08+00:00): Bonjour Tvilches et bienvenue,
le nom du rond-point est normalement "Rond-Point des Gilets Jaunes".
Pourquoi l'as tu modifié ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136143546
Frans S (2023-05-21 08:29:45+00:00): A remark on your mappings.
This project covers the mapping of buildings <
Here you just mapped residential areas rather than the buildings themselves.
Can you correct these mapping ?
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136144203
richlv (2024-04-10 18:46:38+00:00): Šim bija access=foot - tādu principā iesaka nelietot, nomainīju uz access=destination saskaņā ar šovakar novēroto :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154314648/history

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Possible_tagging_mistakes
Reinis Bērziņš (2024-04-13 10:13:08+00:00): Vai tur joprojām ir 302. zīme "Braukt aizliegts" (balts aplis ar sarkanu apmali)? Tātad pēc CSN arī ir pareizi access=destination. Lai gan dabā neizskatās, ka viņi gribēja ierobežot velosipēdistus. Un faktiski varētu ietagot arī motor_vehicle=destination. Bet labāk laikam atstāt oficiālo zīmes definīciju un ļaut velosipēdistiem pašiem dabā izlemt, vai ievērot CSN zīmi ļoti burtiski. Esmu novērojis, ka daudzās vietās, uz ceļa tiek uzstādīta 301. un 302. zīme, kaut arī nebija tāds mērķis aizliegt braukt ar divriteni, lai gan patiesībā prasītos 303. zīme (Mehāniskajiem transportlīdzekļiem braukt aizliegts). Bet zīmes uzstādītāji vienkārši neaizdomājās par velosipēdistiem. Tā bija, piemēram, Mežaparkā, kamēr pēc laika pielika papildsekciju, ka velosipēdiem tomēr drīkst iebraukt.
richlv (2024-04-13 10:18:46+00:00): Y, tieši tā zīme - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=452014137348057.

Un jā, gan šo, gan ķieģeli Latvijā gandrīz visur liek ar domu tikai par auto. Velo papildzīmes tik tā lēnām sāk likt Rīgā.
HellMap (2024-04-13 12:28:40+00:00): Precizēšu - tā kā gājējiem šīs zīmes kustību neaizliedz, tad pēc OSM principiem tas ir `vehicle`. Šeit ar 302. tātad `vehicle=destination`. [1] Bet `access` gan nevajadzētu, jo tas tad aizliedz gājējiem - tad te vajadzētu vēl būt "staigāt aizliegts" zīmei. (Un no velo var arī nokāpt un kļūt par gājēju.)

Kā jau saki, diemžēl Latvijā "izņemot velo" zīmes pie šiem (vai vienkārši 303.) neliek gandrīz nekur, un tas tad teorētiski pēc CSN aizliedz velo (un elektroskūteru, rikšu, u.c.) kustību. Tāpēc, vai tur likt `motor_vehicle` vai visus `vehicle`, sarežģīti izsecināt. Mežaparks bija tizls, jā. Un tādu piemēru daudz. Šeit [2] tāds "foršs" piemērs.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Transportl%C4%ABdzek%C4%BCu_ierobe%C5%BEojumi

[2] https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=606500958115418&focus=photo
Reinis Bērziņš (2024-04-13 12:36:18+00:00): Jā, piekrītu, ka vehicle=destination būtu vispareizākā birka zīmei "Braukt aizliegts". access šeit netiek tiešā veidā ierobežots.
dcskobuffs (2023-05-18 15:17:34+00:00): Correction: Source used was Mapillary
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-15 22:30:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284368295

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2023-05-16 05:35:11+00:00): Istnieje. Sprawdź Geoportal https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?actions=acAddPoint@x=15.02951;y=51.13609;epsg=4326
WieKo68 (2023-05-16 05:37:45+00:00): Poprawny Geoportal: https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp_2.html?actions=acAddPoint@x=15.02537;y=51.15236;epsg=4326
NorthCrab (2023-05-20 11:18:59+00:00): Witaj! Oznaczyłem brakujący plac na OSM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136332906. Pozdrawiam!
mariotomo (2023-05-16 06:17:01+00:00): hola, grazie, molto completo, però dovresti "tradurre" il valore di opening_hours. è carino in spagnolo, ma i software che lo leggeranno lo capiscono se rispetta il contratto stipulato.

https://openingh.ypid.de/evaluation_tool/
Taya_S (2023-05-17 06:46:36+00:00): Hi,

Would you mind giving a more descriptive changeset comment? Right now its very difficult to figure out what this changeset actually did. 

The size of it makes it very difficult for tools like achavi and OSMcha to display. And using the regular openstreetmap changeset viewer means people have got to compare dozens of tags to see which ones are actually different, new or deleted.

Using something like "Added russian names for [x]" for example would already be a lot more descriptive. 

Cheers,
Taya
rskedgell (2023-05-16 08:25:03+00:00): The service road for the school is tagged as access=private, which indicates that the object is not to be used by the general public. Access is only with permission on an individual basis. This would be the usual case for a gated road on school grounds, unless there was a public right of way.

Adding motor_vehicle=yes + bicycle=yes + foot=yes implies that the public has an official, legally-enshrined right of access using those transport modes; i.e., it's a right of way. Please could you confirm whether there is a public right of way, or revert your change?

Thanks.

There is a full explanation of tagging in OpenStreetMap here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Urbis13 (2023-05-16 07:12:54+00:00): Hi Peter Bremer, I have seen that you removed the tag access = no to a lot of cycleways based on the fact that it will make the cycleways inacessible. I would ask if you are sure that this removal of tagging is correct. In fact in at least one case (which I personally know since it is may area) the access=no on the cycleways is due to the fact that fact that the cycleway (despide being signeposted as such by road sign) is actually barred adn entrance is not available for foot and cycles. Are you sure that this could not be the case in a lot of the ways that you changed ?
Andrea Musuruane (2023-05-16 07:53:58+00:00): Hello Peter. Have you made a survey before making these changes? For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/78652750. In the note tag I read the bridge has been closed since April 2019 because of structural damages.
MxxCon (2023-05-16 06:59:38+00:00): Hello.
This project urgently needs to update to the latest version of iD. This version is using outdated tags for crosswalks which will require additional effort to modernize all the relevant ways and nodes edited by this project.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136145208
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-05-21 08:49:01+00:00): Road names should not use abbreviations.
Mazda05 (2023-05-17 16:14:25+00:00): Прошу повернути назву Пикник в Маріуполі https://www.facebook.com/cafe.piknik/
avinet_ua (2023-05-17 16:22:57+00:00): +
mariotomo (2023-05-18 19:26:45+00:00): hola, gracias por apoyar el mapa OSM en Panamá. cuidado con la conexión de los elementos, te mejoré una calle que habías conectado con una frontera administrativa. no sé cómo representar el "mirador", no creo que esté bien así, podrías preguntar en el community, si quieres.
TheJediMapp3r (2023-05-20 16:34:11+00:00): Buen dia, gracias por la aclaracion, soy nuevo en este tema y es un hobby para mi.  Esta zona es un vacio donde la gente llega a contemplar la vista del lugar, es bastante informal, pero no se representarlo.  Hay algun libro o manual a parte del Wiki?

Saludos,
mariotomo (2023-05-22 15:48:10+00:00): buen día. "vacío" a parte que en matemática, no existe. ;-) será un espacio con hierba? con arbustos muy muy bajos? con pura piedra? siempre tiene algo, y puede expresarse con un valor en 'landuse' o en 'natural'. cuanto al mirador, según el wiki se representa con un punto, etiquetado con tourism=viewpoint.
el wiki es el manual.
GOwin (2023-05-16 01:54:18+00:00): Hi there! Welcome to OSM.

To map residential blocks, please do not tag them as an "ATM" to force them to show up.

If you need help with your edits, or want to ask questions, try to reach out to the local community: https://osm.org/wiki/PH
os-emmer (2023-12-18 01:17:58+00:00): Hi WardDrain,
you added some ford=Yes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10889095176
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10901142528
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10889095160
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10901142529
This is probably a typo for ford=yes, isn't it? The "y" of "yes" should not be capitalised. Can you have a look?
cuemapper (2023-12-19 16:39:32+00:00): Hello os-emmer, thank you for contacting WardDrain. Upon taking a second look, I can see these tags should read ford=yes. I will update the capitalization of the Y in the tag value, on behalf of WardDrain. Have a nice day.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-28 13:53:39+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7370355373/history has shop = metaphysical that was added in this edit
shop=metaphysical ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=esoteric or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=new_age ? If yes, what is the difference?

Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?  Or maybe it is so obvious duplicate that I should have replaced it with an automatic edit rather than making a note?
m86 (2025-11-28 21:28:41+00:00): I don't really know exactly what this shop sells - it's been a while, and it was probably just added off of my Mapillary captures of this area.

shop=esoteric would probably work fine here, however
felipeeugenio (2023-05-16 13:10:49+00:00): Hola.
ese nombre "Camino Posta Rural" es un nombre oficial? hay un cartel que dice eso?
o es un nombre descriptivo?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136146838
felipeeugenio (2023-05-16 13:09:59+00:00): Hola Wladimir
La calle se llama "Fundo Talhuen Lotes 21 a 30"? o quisiste expresar otra cosa?
po lotes estás hablando de la numeración?
Es difícil de creer el nombre.

saludos
wpg (2023-05-16 18:00:48+00:00): Es el nombre que sale en los avalúos fiscales. Si bien no salen los lotes, lo puse para indicar más fácil una dirección. No existen números municipales.
felipeeugenio (2023-05-16 18:16:53+00:00): ok. Te agradezco. Entiendo lo que intentas hacer, pero eso vendría siendo un nmbre descriptivo. Deja ver como lo hago para dejarlo de acuerdo a las convenciones. gracias
felipeeugenio (2023-05-16 13:12:04+00:00): Hola.
Las villas son vecindarios en OSM (place=neighbourhood)
Village es un pueblo pequeño en si mismo. Los voy a cambiar.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136147059
sen_takeya (2023-06-29 23:13:02+00:00): こんにちは、cuentavidaさん。
あなたが追加した大崎市民病院 鳴子温泉分院の郵便番号が989-6814にされてますけど、これって存在しますか？
またソースがaerial imageryになってますけれどこれでは出ませんので、他に入力時に使用したものをぜひ教えてください
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173186808
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136147089

参考 郵便局HP
https://www.post.japanpost.jp/index.html
989-6814の結果
https://www.post.japanpost.jp/cgi-zip/zipcode.php?zip=989-6814
該当する郵便番号が見つかりませんでした。
再度検索を行ってください。
englu (2023-06-24 10:34:10+00:00): Zauważyłem sporo zduplikowanych linii (nowo dodane linie highway=footway duplikowały już istniejące linie highway=track). Jeśli na mapie są już drogi (np. highway=track), to przy dodawaniu nowych szlaków należy bazować na tych istniejących drogach i je dodawać do relacji np. szlaku. Zduplikowane (leżące na sobie) drogi to błąd, proszę na przyszłość zwrócić na to uwagę. Duplikaty usunąłem. Pozdrawiam.
DP24PH (2023-05-16 10:43:05+00:00): Wait... You may tag with "place=city_block" for the residential blocks.


DP24
AquaticArmadillo (2023-05-17 15:11:52+00:00): Hello megi putra,

Welcome to OSM! I noticed you have been changing a particular group of ways from residential to secondary in multiple changesets that include the following:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136107472
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135833033
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136147676

Per OSM policy, these roads do not meet the definition of a secondary way, which is described as a highway linking large towns or major arterial roads in cities (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=secondary). I believe residential is a more appropriate classification for the following ways would like to change them back to residential:

https://openstreetmap.org/way/511494313
https://openstreetmap.org/way/511483496
https://openstreetmap.org/way/511483510
https://openstreetmap.org/way/511483494
https://openstreetmap.org/way/1050128306
https://openstreetmap.org/way/511484738
https://openstreetmap.org/way/1050434904
https://openstreetmap.org/way/1172898912
https://openstreetmap.org/way/511483509
https://openstreetmap.org/way/511484740
https://openstreetmap.org/way/511483507
https://openstreetmap.org/way/703244966
https://openstreetmap.org/way/676158853
https://openstreetmap.org/way/676158852
https://openstreetmap.org/way/511484733
https://openstreetmap.org/way/511483503
https://openstreetmap.org/way/511483511
https://openstreetmap.org/way/511483499
https://openstreetmap.org/way/1050128307
https://openstreetmap.org/way/1050128308

What was your reasoning for classifying these as secondary? Thanks and I look forward to hearing back from you!
Iko IRM-RV (2023-05-23 04:27:39+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for bringing this up. as a result of your comment, I am attempting to contact Megi Putra.

According to him, these roads have already been upgraded from "Jalan Perumahan" or "Residential" to "Jalan Kabupaten" in accordance with Gresik government policy No 620/503/HK/437.12/2016. "Jalan Kabupaten" refers to a road that connects activity centers. 

I agree with Megi Putra that these roads should not be used for residential purposes again. But I agree with you too that these are not secondary roads, because secondary roads are too high for Jalan Kabupaten.

So here's my suggestion from this wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads

I believe it would be more appropriate if these roads were labeled as unclassified roads. 
CMIIW

---------------------------------------

Hai,
Terima kasih telah menyampaikan hal ini. sebagai hasil dari komentar Anda, saya mencoba menghubungi Megi Putra.

Menurutnya, jalan-jalan tersebut sudah ditingkatkan statusnya dari "Jalan Perumahan" menjadi "Jalan Kabupaten" sesuai dengan kebijakan pemerintah Gresik No. 620/503/HK/437.12/2016. "Jalan Kabupaten" adalah jalan yang menghubungkan pusat-pusat kegiatan. 

Saya setuju dengan Megi Putra bahwa jalan ini tidak boleh digunakan untuk perumahan lagi. Tapi saya juga setuju dengan Anda bahwa ini bukan jalan sekunder, karena jalan sekunder terlalu tinggi untuk Jalan Kabupaten.

Jadi, inilah saran saya dari wiki ini:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads

Menurut saya, akan lebih tepat jika jalan-jalan ini diberi label sebagai jalan tidak berklasifikasi. 
Koreksi saya jika salah
AquaticArmadillo (2023-05-24 17:18:35+00:00): Hello Iko RM-RV,

Thanks for reaching out. While I agree secondary is too high of a classification for this area, residential seems more appropriate than unclassified based on the tagging guidelines you shared. For example, the primary use of the following roads are to connect residential streets and provide access to housing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511483505, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172898912.

Additionally, it would be best to maintain consistency in the classification of the following ways rather than having differing segmented classifications: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676158853, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1170451288,  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511484733.

Thank you and I look forward to hearing back from you.
ikopanjirukmana (2023-05-25 02:44:21+00:00): Sorry, I didn't understand why you said residential is more appropriate than unclassified. For instance, the roads you mentioned that "following roads are to connect residential streets and provide access to housing:"

www.openstreetmap.org/way/511483505, www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172898912


If I'm not mistaken, the Indonesian tagging guidelines state that highway=residential means "without the primary function of connecting settlements." 

Actually, In this area i'm already changed it to unclassified https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136435901, but some one changed it back to secondary https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136440394
ikopanjirukmana (2023-05-25 02:50:38+00:00): ups i forget to change my account, this is my personal account.
AquaticArmadillo (2023-05-25 20:53:02+00:00): Hello ikopanjirukmana, 

Thanks for your response. I agree that unclassified is an appropriate classification for the ways you mentioned based on your explanation.
BCNorwich (2023-05-16 05:47:29+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I know you didn't add it but there is a tag of fuel:diesel=no which seems unusual to me. Can you say if diesel is or is not sold at this fuel station, please?

Regards Bernard.
alphasixtyfive (2023-05-16 05:55:13+00:00): Good day,

Diesel is definitely being sold here.
BCNorwich (2023-05-16 06:17:34+00:00): Hi, Good Day to you as well,

Thanks for the quick response, I've now removed the fuel:diesel=no tag.

Regards Bernard.
compdude (2023-05-27 03:08:36+00:00): It seems like you made this an admin boundary by mistake.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-05-16 03:29:56+00:00): double tagged addresses (ie: 123/124) not touched.
fititnt (2023-05-16 21:53:48+00:00): @Spaghetti Monster🍝, você acredita que seguiu o Código de conduta de edições automatizadas com essa edição?

Onde está discussão com comunidade local? Pode passar o link?
kurisubrooks (2023-08-01 11:54:36+00:00): Hi there. This changeset appears to add Address Names/Numbers to the names of several businesses in Parramatta Square, where they would not usually be a part of the name. Please note that names should only contain the official business name as listed on signage or other physical features. I've reverted this changeset as part of changeset 139296541. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this decision.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-11-16 03:36:56+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223998671
HellMap (2023-05-16 12:44:22+00:00): Sveiki!

Vai šie laukumi laikam domāti 
`area:highway=service` (nevis `services`)? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173200238 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173200239

Piebildīšu, ka arī ceļiem, ap kuriem tie ir, kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840961606 tad jābūt `highway=service`, jo `area:highway` apraksta precīzu tā ceļa ģeometriju, bet gluži nevar būt pats par sevi. Vai arī tad laukumam jābūt `area:highway=track`. Nav jau protams liela problēma, bet sanāk piemēram konfliktējoši `tracktype=grade3` (bez seguma), kas iet pa `surface=paved` laukumu.

Neesmu te personīgi bijis, tāpēc nemācēšu precīzi izlabot. No ortofoto arī grūti pateikt.

Paldies
Reinis Bērziņš (2023-08-19 15:19:16+00:00): Sveiks! Atvaino par vēlo atbildi! Jā, bija domāts "service", nevis "services". Tu ļoti pareizi izlaboji. Tie ir kādreizējie militārās lidostas aproni/atzari aviācijas stāvēšanai, klāti ar betona plāksnēm. Esmu to vietu vairākkārt izbraukājis. Tieši tur nekas būtiski nav mainījies, salīdzinot ar dažādiem aerofotogrāfijas slāņiem.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2023-05-16 10:43:02+00:00): Please do not remove cycleway connectors. This will make routing for bicycle problematic.
BlingChug (2023-05-19 02:10:45+00:00): Didnt notices the house number duplicated, i thought i removed them already. let me fix that
StC (2023-05-18 15:13:51+00:00): Hello Denis,

attention que ce genre de modification sur les carrefours (way 217345458) introduit des discontinuités dans les relations d'itinéraires en laissant un bout de chemin qui va au-delà de la jonction.
Cordialement,
StC
Denis_Helfer (2023-05-19 16:52:14+00:00): Hello,
Quand on est invasif, comme moi, forcément il y a des dommages collatéraux. Pourtant j'essaie de faire attention à rétablir la continuité des relations que je touche.
Des fois, il y a des loupés.
b-unicycling (2023-05-16 22:40:58+00:00): very unusual tags used here, apart from "name", none are standard
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-16 06:10:15+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8846617515
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413895843

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
habi (2023-05-16 06:17:26+00:00): Siehe Diskussion hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136009092
Supaplex (2023-05-16 07:19:04+00:00): 那個，這是同支電話，你把國碼去掉了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136152033
lipuma (2023-05-17 13:41:04+00:00): Hi kevin, I noticed some odd tags on this way in this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173216092

Are you sure these are correct?
kevinp2 (2023-05-17 17:18:28+00:00): Hi, I have fixed this, thanks for pointing this out!
eggie (2023-05-16 07:28:00+00:00): Dag MPM  Wanneer hier een hek is (accesstags?) dan zal er ook een toegangsweg met accesstags zijn.
Wellicht highway=track ?

MVG
eggie
user_6110846 (2023-05-16 07:15:07+00:00): азыркы Украинадагы өлкөнүн аты
PatrickKnopf (2023-05-26 20:53:45+00:00): Finalized in josm
NorthCrab_upload (2023-05-16 07:30:13+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408710535
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408710625
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408786338

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
letihu (2025-02-16 21:29:07+00:00): Magst du noch mal nachschauen?
Bei way 1029359097 ist die Nr. 10 wahrscheinlich die Nr. 19
Hier way 1029359098 19a
und way 1029359099 die Nr. 21
theophrastos (2025-02-17 05:16:13+00:00): An dieser Stelle muss ich nochmal hin. Deshalb zunächst nur ein fixme, damit ich es nicht vergesse. Danke für den Hinweis.
eggie (2023-05-17 10:48:46+00:00): Oke.... 

Maar de verbinding op het terrein zelf is wellicht ook van belang in noodsituaties.
Tenminste als je van die verbinding gebruik kan maken.
highway=track  tracktype=grade5
surface=grass
Het hek heb ik op slot gezet met access=private  Wanneer je een sleutel hebt dan evt emergency=designated

MVG
eggie
just_another_mapper (2023-05-18 08:37:37+00:00): These edits you've been making around La Perouse are amazing! Makes the whole place so much easier to understand on a map
pbnoxious (2023-05-19 07:21:52+00:00): Hi, der "fehlende" Track-Part war doch eigentlich schon eingetragen, oder gibts da wirklich zwei parallele Wege? (alt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980532746 vs neu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1173227272 )
TheStrat (2023-06-13 07:27:49+00:00): Hallo auch :-)

Irgendwie stimmt da was nicht. Zuvor war da meines Wissens nur die Loipe eingezeichnet, nicht jedoch das fehlende Stück des "Tracks". Deswegen hatte ich das fehlende Stück nachgetragen. Vielleicht ja auch falsch :-?
Rom1 (2023-05-16 10:20:56+00:00): Bonjour, ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1149004215 il s'agit bien de path et non cycleway. Merci
NastassiaKalesnikava (2023-05-16 08:51:37+00:00): Added speed limit 10 kph. Source - local user's request. #mbx_editing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136157367
zyxzyx (2023-05-16 12:20:24+00:00): Thank you for your editing.
But it has the side effect of a steep bend at the node of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4918989401.
Please confirm it on 全国最新写真(シームレス) and improve it.
Thank you.
philippec (2023-05-18 20:19:03+00:00): Nieuwkapelle kerk, ik heb nog nooit een AED op een hoek gezien.
philippec (2025-03-05 09:23:01+00:00): De AED staat buiten
VIPINDAS K (2023-05-17 11:30:21+00:00): Buildings shape need to be maintained while mapping (Short key: Q)
Please check it...
Happy mapping...

OSM Keral Community (Telegram):  https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136158649