piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
changchun_1 (2023-03-10 20:39:50+00:00): Hilfe warum wurden in und um Heilbronn herum alle Weinberge zerstückelt und viele landuses gelöscht.
user_5359 (2023-01-16 07:58:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on you new nodes. What is the meaning of the tags?
ADRESSE = Hauptstrasse 399 A
BESCHREIB = Autounterstand
LAT_DEG = 46.6103237
LONG_DEG = 7.2861429
ORTSCHAFT = Jaun
PLZ = 1656
STOVERSION = 2022-09-30
STO_ID = 200000961
TELEFON = 079 60072 86
TITEL = Samariterverein Jaun
URL_BILD = -
ZUGANG = 24/Std.
biobuur (2023-01-16 14:04:06+00:00): Hi
Thank you very much for your intervention. I will correct it. This are the original tags from the source
changchun_1 (2023-03-11 09:01:39+00:00): Hallo hmkaiser, warum hast du hier diese ganzen landuses gelöscht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117803582
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117806607
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65618950
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117806658
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313298860
Bitte wieder richten.
limes11 (2023-03-11 13:33:53+00:00): Hi

schau dir mal diese Diskussion an, insbesondere die letzten 10-15 Kommentare.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/massives-umtaggen-entfernen-von-building-yes-bei-slurry-tank/95326/64

Es ist unwahrscheinlich, dass er selbst irgendetwas davon zurücknehmen wird.

Wenn du es sauber revertieren kannst, dann nur zu!

VG
LuxuryCoop (2023-01-16 06:20:34+00:00): 안녕하세요! 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다.
오픈스트리트맵 편집에 Vworld를 이용하면 '국내 지도 해외 반출 금지' 조항에 걸리게 됩니다.

열심히 기여하신 부분을 되돌리게 되어 유감입니다.
앞으로는 다른 지도를 이용하지 않고 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주시면 감사드리겠습니다!
혹시 궁금하신 점이 있으시다면 오픈스트리트맵 한국 커뮤니티 텔레그램 채팅방(https://t.me/osmKorea)이나 포럼(https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/ko/74)으로 오셔서 자유롭게 말씀해 주세요.
TrekClimbing (2023-11-15 08:56:09+00:00): Hi Beetec
 Thanks for this edit - you're right it should be destination only for motor vehicles. Just to let you know, the access tag is for everything - even on foot or bike. I've changed this to the motor_vehicle tag. Thanks, Tom
Mashin (2023-01-14 21:35:29+00:00): Thanks for the update. Is the land around actually a nature reserve or anyhow protected?

Regarding the trails. We keep those in the database, but if there are any usage restrictions this can be marked with `access` tag. e.g. access=private.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Trail_Access_Project

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values
Natfoot (2023-07-13 17:52:34+00:00): This edit needs to be reviewed again.
Jeff Underwood (2023-07-13 19:54:28+00:00): Can you be more specific? 'ele=f' is not a valid tag as far as I know.
Natfoot (2023-07-13 22:38:25+00:00): Have you looked at the location of this mark? Probably should have been reverted / removed at the time you made the edit.
StefanHRT (2023-01-15 03:36:19+00:00): In diesem Bereich gibt es auf Mapillary Fotos, 1 Woche alt ;)
stillhart (2023-01-15 12:17:56+00:00): Genial, danke. Manchmal würde ich mich darüber freuen wenn iD etwas hilfreicher sein könnte. Links zu ähnliches Ressourcen, anderen Daten, History der Ansicht, usw :-)
Meine Edit basiert aber auf den Drohnen-Videos von Gestern, noch etwas neuer :-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rafU_9ljX4Y&t=86s
StefanHRT (2023-01-15 13:26:04+00:00): Tja, man muss überall mal schauen ;) Durch Mapillary und den von mir hochgeladenen GPS-Tracks durch verschiedenen Geräte hast Du recht genaue GPS-Spuren und kannst surface etc. gut erkennen ;)
ma-rt-in (2023-02-12 12:35:41+00:00): Hallo,

bitte verwende in deinen Änderungen ein Kommentarsatz. Nur so kann man verstehen was du hier gemacht hast.

vg
MxxCon (2023-01-17 05:54:35+00:00): Why make multipolygon relation out of a single rectangle?🤨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131280386
Michael Alvarez (2023-01-17 05:59:58+00:00): I thought I added the community farm to the rest of the red hook park. Unless I confused something.
MxxCon (2023-01-17 06:09:16+00:00): Ah, I see what happened here. This changeset's bounding box is only over the community farm so it looked like you created it only over the farm, but the relation itself is much larger with other polygons.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-02-19 16:03:38+00:00): You've accidentally added a hedge here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/769134690
I'll remove it, but be careful and check your changes.
Mathias_ADAV (2024-05-31 08:38:35+00:00): Salut Remy, merci pour la contribution de la piste cycalble  Avenue de la Libération. Concernant le le revetement, tu as mis compacted, on est pas plutôt sur asphalt ?
Rems (2024-06-12 19:56:37+00:00): Hello, en effet merci ; j'ai corrigé et ajouté le smoothness en excellent https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152603806
Robert Whittaker (2023-05-04 10:18:55+00:00): In this changest you added a node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10555428087 with name=Pure Gym and not:brand:wikidata=Q18345898 .

The latter tag states that the gym is *not* part of the "PureGym" chain described at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18345898 , i.e. isn't not part of https://www.puregym.com/ .

Can I ask if this is correct? It seems odd that someone would be able to call their gym "Pure Gym" if it wasn't part ofhte chain. It's possible that the tag was added acidentally by mis-clicking something in the OSM editor.

If the gym is part of that chain, then I think the name should be "PureGym" (no space) and it would be good to add brand:wikidata=Q18345898 to capture this.
Maptapper (2023-05-04 15:30:24+00:00): Hi Robert, As you guessed this is incorrect, not sure why i tagged it as "NOT" PureGym.

I will amend accordingly
FTA (2023-10-07 15:50:10+00:00): Hey there, I noticed that the building on the west side of this changeset has a very funky corner on the SW edge. It's a good case for feedback on the ML derived shapes/import because it doesn't match imagery and isn't very physical either. Cheers, Ethan aka FTA
eggie (2023-01-15 10:36:54+00:00): Dag Dorsman... 

Bedankt voor je bijdrage..  
Meestal hebben laadpalen geen naam. Je zou evt description kunnen gebruiken.
Wel van belang is dat je de operator=  en capacity=..  en de doelgroep toevoegdt.
Zie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

MVG
eggie
silversurfer83 (2023-05-11 02:42:06+00:00): Moin
Warum trägst du hier Namen ein, die auf den ersten Blick erstmal eher nur beschreibender Natur sind?
(bsp: Stall)
Grüße 
Silversurfer83
Hilmar (2023-05-11 07:49:56+00:00): Moin,
es handelt sich hier um Gebäude und Flächen einer größeren Reitanlage  (Reitverein Isernhagen). Mit den Namen will ich die einzelnen Funktionen der Gebäude und Flächen der Reitanlage hervorheben.
Gruß
Hilmar
silversurfer83 (2023-05-11 12:31:34+00:00): Hallo und danke für die schnelle Reaktion.

Das ist grundsätzlich nicht verwerflich, jedoch sollte bei der Nutzung des tags "name=*" gut aufgepasst werden nicht "für den Renderer" zu arbeiten. Das bedeutet: Ich benenne ein Objekt um diesen Namen auch sicher in der Karte angezeigt zu bekommen.
Ich verlinke dir mal die Artikel im Wiki, die sich mit "name=*" und "lying to the renderer" beschäftigen.
Ich würde dich bitten, da du vor Ort besser Bescheid weißt, dann noch einmal grob über die von Dir angelegten Objekte bzw. angelegten Namen zu schauen, ob diese wirklich dem Sinne des Artikels im Wiki entsprechen. Danke :)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer
Qwajo OSM (2023-01-14 23:18:54+00:00): Are these added boundaries real or have you made them up on the map, please?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131282149
danvyr (2023-01-15 14:44:41+00:00): what boundaries?
I added fences and farmlands according satellite images
wireguy (2023-01-15 16:41:11+00:00): Peace, fixing coastline clipped a bit off the Delaware Bay relation, and now it's broken.
bxl-forever (2023-01-19 22:46:35+00:00): Hello,

We had to do some cleanup here, I don’t know what happened here but even if you have good intentions, you are uploading lots of invalid data to the database, which takes more and more time to solve.

The "Sint-Andries" barriers are universally tagged as barrier=fence + fence_type=railing.  There is no tag to define this more accurately.  Do not use the "type" key, it has nothing to do with that (and no software will understand it), and please make sure you avoid typos, because I found almost 30 occurrences of "type=Ssint Andries" in your data.

Also, comments like "local survey and CIRB/CIBG imagery" must be typed only once upon uploading.  Please do not write this tag to each object individually, it is just confusing.  We also spotted some duplicates, where you wanted to type source but typed… shop, and it created several fake shops on the map.  I might have finished cleaning everything now but I wanted to tell you.

Hope this helps.  Have a nice day.
lordmcdrake (2023-01-15 15:47:45+00:00): How do you know that this spring has drinkable water?
MxxCon (2023-01-17 05:58:24+00:00): That playground name tag is a doozy... Is that an official name or just something you came up with?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131282822
Michael Alvarez (2023-01-17 06:05:26+00:00): It has title included on the signs posted on the fence on the entrances. I was on the fence myself about that name. It looks so messy. Although, “Community Playground” is a bigger font than the rest of the name on the sign. It can pass for both. I’ll just name it community playground. The large name irks me too.
MxxCon (2023-01-17 06:14:06+00:00): Perhaps rather than naming it generic "Community Playground" it's better to show that with access tags?
eggie (2023-01-15 05:51:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Meestal kloppen de adresnodes wel, want die zijn gevoldg van import vanuit het Kadaster.
Wanneer je zaken daar aan gaat aanpassen krijg je dubbelingen en andere adresnodes zijn verdwenen.
nr 902 komt nu 2x voor in het bestand.. Ik herstel even wat.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=131282925

Wat was het probleem hier? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
APneunzehn74 (2023-03-03 17:44:23+00:00): Aus welchem Grund hast du die Wege um den Geiersberg von highway=footway zu highway=path umgetagt? Die Wege dort sind mit DE:239 beschildert.
Grüße APneuzehn74
WeinFlo (2023-03-07 09:08:37+00:00): Wenn dort wirklich das DE:239 Schild war es mein Fehler sorry. Bin dort mit dem MTB durchgekommen und mir ist es nicht aufgefallen. Das Problem ist wenn man Wege als footway kennzeichnet  sollte man bei "Erlaubter Zugang" Fahrräder auf "no" setzen. Doch dann sind die Wege in Fahrradroutenplaner für 
 Fahrräder gesperrt. Was ja stimmt aber oft ärgerlich ist. Lange Rede kurzer Sinn. War mein Fehler. Habe gesehen du hast es schon bereinigt. Gruß WeinFlo
APneunzehn74 (2023-03-07 09:32:40+00:00): Servus kein Problem, ich bin eher der Meinung ein bicycle=no ist grundsätzlich unnötig. Ein Router sollte ja Grundsätzlich wissen das über footway nicht geroutet werden darf. 
Kommt aber vermutlich auf den Router an.
Grüße APneunzehn74
APneunzehn74 (2023-03-07 09:37:21+00:00): PS. Ich komme ja aus der Ecke und kann bestätigen das in der Praxis kaum bis gar keine Fahrräder dort unterwegs sind.
user_14547832 (2023-01-15 03:26:38+00:00): Was this supposed to be Changeset #2183
eggie (2023-01-15 06:12:06+00:00): Beste Yoeri.. 
Elk begin is natuurlijk moeilijk. 
Je tekent een pad op een pad en er vlak naast..   Ik heb het verdubbelde deel verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
Yoeri Philippus De groote (2023-01-16 01:21:46+00:00): Hoi Eggie, 
ik heb jou hier een berichtje over gestuurd.

Met vriendelijke Groet,
Yoeri
eggie (2023-01-16 06:36:44+00:00): Oke.de sluiproute. . gelezen..

Mapse..
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:09:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
aTarom (2023-01-15 14:52:23+00:00): Hola OSMapeador,
gracias por editar, una consulta desde el desconocimiento
el tag
"payment:nets"="yes"
es un error o es algún tipo de "vale de barrio de alguna red de comercio"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9858665669/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4366754438/history
Saludos
OSMapeador (2023-01-16 12:47:59+00:00): Hola aTarom,
es un método de pago que se me había colado en la app. Ya lo he corregido.
¡Gracias por estar al tanto y remarcarlo!
Un saludo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:02:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:05:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:04:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:10:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:07:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:06:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-02-07 08:08:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 132181774, 132186175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unsourced changes to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6844 and the links from there.
ivanbranco (2023-01-17 14:43:32+00:00): Hi Hon,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2561162948/history
this is a quarter or a city?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2564036936/history
this is a quarter or a village?
Hon約 (2023-01-18 01:50:23+00:00): I sloved them
maraf24 (2023-04-15 19:26:28+00:00): Proszę o nierozdzielanie ddrip, które nie posiadają fizycznej seperacji.
NorthCrab (2023-04-15 19:31:03+00:00): Nie popieram celowego zmniejszania ilości detalu na mapie. Ale ile razy można się powtarzać..
archpdx (2023-01-15 08:36:36+00:00): Hi,
Please note that we typically don't abbreviate street names in OSM (see https://wiki.osm.org/abbreviation). For cases like these, the short_name tag should be used (https://wiki.osm.org/Key:short_name).

It looks like another user added short_name to all MAX stations a couple years ago (https://osm.org/changeset/101082167)
PaulBL (2023-01-15 20:47:36+00:00): Thanks for the letting me know. I just want back through and fixed the street names to comply with the OSM street name policy.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-23 06:14:12+00:00): I'm not seeing any trace of a railway here from the latest satellite imagery.

Can you elaborate on the source?

As an FYI, "abandoned" should only be used if there is some trace left, whether that be rails, signals, overhead wires, or railroad ties.  In this case, I see none of that.  If nothing exists now, but did at one time and it is being mapped for historical reasons, it doesn't belong on OSM.  But luckily, there is a website called OpenHistoricalMap, which is a form of OSM and allows all sorts of historic features to be added.  Lifecycle changes can even be mapped from when it was planned to built to active and then disused to abandoned and removed.
save2desk (2023-02-13 10:17:05+00:00): Локомотивную нужно исправить. Сейчас по ней невозможно построить маршрут в город.
mariotomo (2023-01-16 13:54:50+00:00): nice set of improvements, thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131288180
habi (2023-01-16 13:59:49+00:00): Tschou Souhung

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Schön machst du hier mit und hilfst, die Karte und die Kartendaten zu pflegen.

E Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
Charlie Gorichanaz (2023-01-15 08:01:38+00:00): I made this change to the wrong entity, so I will revert with a followup
Hufkratzer (2023-01-15 14:06:49+00:00): Hi, isn't https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100935421 a riding arena which schould be tagged as pitch (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena)?

Isn't it the same with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103351683
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103351694 ?
bumpyroad (2023-01-16 02:14:10+00:00): Thank you for pointing that out, I have fixed the tags.
Adam_Piszczek (2023-09-15 06:28:53+00:00): Cześć,Droga pieszo rowerowa jest asfaltowa od Bierunia przejazd kolejowy  do Kopciowic,możesz zmienić tagi.
BCNorwich (2023-01-15 10:51:26+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the house number from the name tag. The name tag is for a formal verifiable name.

Regards Bernard.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-18 17:41:02+00:00): So this is the one I meant to comment on instead of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131289960 :D

McMasters is definitely wide enough for a boat, which is why I was wondering if the leisure=slipway tag should be left on
treestryder (2023-03-18 18:06:28+00:00): It depends on if folks should expect to be able to back a trailer in to launch their boat. 

What I see, and remember, is this was designed as a canoe launch. Having a log breaker wall, that has since formed a sand bar nearly, but not completely, as high as the wall. So it does look like a ramp. Though, it is just soft shifting sand on the other side of the log breaker.
https://mapillary.com/map/im/477348520161604

I would not back a boat trailer in there. If you would, change it back to a slipway. However, I would make a note of the less than ideal conditions in the description and/or other attribute tags.
emersonveenstra (2023-03-21 11:50:37+00:00): I guess you're right, but I don't know of a better tag. `canoe=*` is an access restriction and meant to describe the access of whatever it's on, and without a top-level tag like leisure=slipway there's nothing to apply the access to. Maybe adding canoe=put_in to the path would make more sense?
treestryder (2023-03-24 02:16:53+00:00): The Michigan Wiki page has a cheat sheet on tagging common things in our area.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Water

I'll admit "canoe" is overloaded, in many ways, but it works. It is an old tag. Around long before the confusion the whitewater group caused by creating an expansive, yet narrowly named scheme. It probably would have went unnoticed, but they got support added in many renders. The route=canoe page explains it better. "Signed route for canoeists, kayakers and other paddlers. In OSM canoe=* is the general term for all these paddlers"

I have asked if there is any reason not to create the separate pages for canoe=portage and canoe=put_in.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:canoe


Because of OsmAnd's really nice support for the whitewater scheme, I even started tagging to the renderer. Always intending to switch the moment I found leaned a more generic paddle-craft term had been chosen. I have since cleaned up these tags…

Asked OsmAnd to add support for canoe…
https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/16105

And added Paddling categories to OpenStreetBrowser.
https://openstreetbrowser.org/#map=17/42.71836/-84.56041&categories=paddling_amenities,paddling_hazards,paddling_routes
emersonveenstra (2023-03-24 11:03:49+00:00): okay, thanks for the info!
Kin Sapalot (2023-01-15 14:48:21+00:00): Hoi Frank,

Je nu per ongeluk het net gestripte en gerenoveerde V&D gebouw weggehaald! Daar zit in Rechtestraat 6 een Costes; met het idee van een roof-top-bar die ik nog niet geprobeerd heb... 

Alleen het stukje tussen 6 en 15/16 is brownfield (en misschien nog wat meer naar achter richting Krabbendampad)
FrankOverman (2023-01-15 14:57:44+00:00): Oh, dat heb ik niet opgemerkt toen ik er onlangs langs liep. Draai changeset maar terug als je wil, ik kijk straks wel ff. Tnx!
FrankOverman (2023-01-15 17:13:36+00:00): Ik controleer nu en constateer dat ik finaal de mist in ben gegaan: reverting.
FrankOverman (2023-01-15 20:17:09+00:00): 2e poging, changeset 131312875

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131312875
NorthCrab (2023-01-15 09:31:54+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikację.

Uważaj aby nie dodawać zbędnych tagów dostępowych do ścieżek, jeśli nie ma jakichś specjalnych oznaczeń to pozostaw domyślnymi.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Poland

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6597009046#map=19/50.66196/18.04310
Proszę nie przyłączaj ścieżek do granic, jeśli granice ci przeszkadzają to je ukryj w filtrach edytora.

Pozdrawiam!
emersonveenstra (2023-03-18 15:09:40+00:00): Hey,

I know this is an old changeset, but I'm not sure removing leisure=slipway is correct here.
Looking at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=slipway, the main overview is "A slipway is a ramp into the water for launching a boat.", which is what this is. Could you maybe explain more why you removed it instead of just adding the canoe tag in addition to leisure=slipway?