piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Xenko (2024-05-22 04:58:54+00:00): I was checking Google Maps as well as one of the City of Calgary development plans for the area, but I think you might be right and Google Maps is wrong, and the plan was not "official" and still in the proposal stage (and most likely someone pulled the baseline image from Google).

I've dug deeper, and I think it is actually the North-South street (that looks like a parking aisle) is Nina Gardens NE based on the following City of Calgary resources:
1) https://dmap.calgary.ca/?find=NINA%20GD%20NE
2) https://cityonline.calgary.ca/mapviewer
3) https://maps.calgary.ca/MyProperty/?redirect=/myproperty

I'll undo/revert this change. Thanks!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151655713
hoserab (2024-05-22 16:52:35+00:00): Thank you for double-checking. :)

I don't know that Nina Gardens actually exists as a signed road, but there's no denying the buildings do have addresses on "Nina Gardens". It's a weird situation. I also thought that Colonel Baker Place might get re-signed to "Nina Gardens", but it hadn't happened as of last year. (Hence the ask to double-check. :) )

I think "Nina Gardens" was originally  the pathway in the courtyard in the middle of the low-rise, low-income townhouses that were here from the early 1990s until 2010. This is excerpted from the City's online archive of old aerial imagery (specifically the 1995 set; see https://maps.calgary.ca/calgaryimagery/): https://i.imgur.com/Grbi480.png

It's a little weird that a footpath has a "name", but it's not entirely unique. See for example "Fountain Walk SW" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/510566164#map=19/51.04186/-114.0839). Believe it or not the condo apartments in the middle of that complex *do* have legal addresses on Fountain Walk SW! :D

All this said, just a heads up and friendly reminder: don't use Google Maps as a source. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?  One of the reasons why we shouldn't, besides the questionable legality of doing so, is that Google Maps can be wrong! What got me mapping things on OSM in the first place was the many errors I found on Google Maps—fictitious neighbourhoods (https://www.google.ca/maps/place/Festuburt,+Calgary,+AB/@51.0017578,-114.1676025,15z/), towns that were just ranches that happened to have a post office a century ago (https://www.google.ca/maps/place/Pirmez+Creek,+AB+T3Z+2W8/@51.0400965,-114.4043672,15z/) or were never more than whistle-stops on the CPR, fictitious road names (https://www.google.ca/maps/place/Starr+Hill+SW,+Calgary,+AB+T3H+3J6/), etc.—that never got fixed, even after I tried to "suggest edits".

Thanks again!
rskedgell (2024-05-21 09:18:03+00:00): If you area using OS Explorer Sheet 149 as a source, this is subjrect to Ordnance Survey's copyright and MUST NOT be used as a source for OpenStreetMap.

There is OSM-compatible open data available for Public Rights of Way (PRoWs) in you area, available from
https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/kent/swale/swale-rural/

There's a more information on copyright and OSM at the links below.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey
PAL3001 (2024-05-21 16:58:24+00:00): Thank you for your comments - I have been using OS and way markers at the locations to identify the location of footpaths in the local area. I walk these and add them using my own GPS data which I believe counts as my own survey - this does not seem to be in breach of their copyright if I have understood correctly. I will be more careful in how I describe my changes.
rskedgell (2024-05-21 17:18:55+00:00): Thanks for the reassurance. Unfortunately, the comment did give the impression that the OS map was the source.

What you describe counts as your own survey. When you upload in the iD editor, you can select "Survey" and "GPS" as sources and this will add that information to the changeset.
DorneyLake123 (2024-05-20 22:09:49+00:00): Hi Damawa, is there a reason why you're removing the house name?
eggie (2024-05-20 18:41:02+00:00): Dag RIPS  Je heb access destination getagd, maar hier lopen een officiele wandelroute en een knooppunt fietsroute. Die zijn nu geblokkeerd.
Die routes bestaan niet meer?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-20 18:48:19+00:00): Het is vanuit het westen tot de Eiermijndreef motorcar=destination  Daarna niet meer of er moet iets veranderd zijn.
Het is onwaarschijnlijk dat officiele routes zouden zijn afgesloten met een algemene tag alleen bestemmingsverkeer.

Ik heb access=destination voorlopig verwijderd.
Graag meer info .. dan kunnen we evt. helpen met de juiste tagging.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2024-05-20 18:53:49+00:00): Zie hier de fietsroutes https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=14.0/51.5374/5.8194
eggie (2024-05-20 19:36:43+00:00): Tagging eerste stuk aangepast conform wiki
way 	motor_vehicle=destination & motorcycle=yes & moped=yes & mofa=yes & traffic_sign=NL:C6
RIPS10 (2024-05-22 18:40:09+00:00): Niet goed gezien, dat het waarschijnlijk al helemaal goed stond.
Thanks, je hebt helemaal gelijk eggie!
eggie (2024-05-22 18:42:55+00:00): No problem..  Het klopt weer. :)
silversurfer83 (2024-05-20 19:34:18+00:00): Hi :)

was genau meinst du mit "foot=use_sidepath" an diesem Weg?
Das ist ein Wert, den wir eigentlich an Straßen schreiben, wenn diese einen mit einem benutzungspflichtigen begleitenden Fußweg ausgestattet sind

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151594298
cs-de (2024-05-20 20:07:28+00:00): Hey,
da hab ich wohl ausversehen was falsches ausgewählt. 

Danke für den Hinweis.
真中あお (2024-05-20 19:48:21+00:00): 调整已有河道是因为在泥石流后改道了
ChristopherGS (2024-06-28 02:09:16+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OpenstreetMap! I see that you are mapping bike parking in Old Town--that's great, thanks! This one you placed in what appears to be the street intersection. I know there is bike parking near Polka Dots and on Cesar Chavez near lot 56, I'm going to move this one to those locations instead.
miluethi (2024-05-20 21:27:48+00:00): Hi Kim,
Please square out all your building additions by pressing the "Q" key.

Thank you
silversurfer83 (2024-05-20 19:39:33+00:00): Hi :)

(bitte nicht falsch verstehen, dass ich hier schreibe. Deine Änderungen liegen einfach innerhalb des Radius, den ich beobachte und ich möchte nur dabei helfen, dass alles passt, ok?)

Falls dieser Weg beschildert ist, klick dir doch mal die Schilderkombination in dem Verkehrszeichen tool zusammen und vergleich das Ergebnis mal mit deinen Angaben hier. Aktuell dürfen hier ausnahmslos nur Radler, Fußgänger und Reiter durch. Alles andere ist verboten.

Grüße
silversurfer83

(details versucht auch der Artikel https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access zu liefern)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151595727
silversurfer83 (2024-05-27 07:09:33+00:00): Hallo nochmal :)

wie schon erwähnt: Ich will hier keinem was Böses. Daher einfach nur meine Frage nach der Beschilderung dieses Weges, da aktuell nur Fußgänger, Radfahrer und Reiter hier entlang dürfen.

Grüße und immer gute Fahrt
silversurfer83
silversurfer83 (2024-07-22 19:24:36+00:00): ?
dathoschy (2024-07-23 01:32:46+00:00): Nun das da alles andere Verbote ist, ist auch richtig. Es handelt sich hier nicht um eine öffentliche Straße.
silversurfer83 (2024-07-23 05:23:20+00:00): Moin :)

wenn ich nach der Liegenschaftskarte gehe sehe ich, dass dieser Weg zumindest aus den anderen Fluren herausgetrennt ist und wie alle anderen Straßen und Wege (nur ohne Name) dargestellt ist. Für mich als Laien sieht das so aus, als wäre das ein gewidmeter Wirtschaftsweg, was auch erklärt, warum da (siehe deine Änderung von heute morgen) von der lokalen Behörde ein VZ nach StVO aufgestellt ist. Ist also schon eine "öffentliche Straße", nur mit Einschränkung nach Verkehrsmittel.
MarbleRock (2024-05-20 18:54:43+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.81381681743915&lng=16.01329444195244&z=18.80320419569789&pKey=3615600818684636&focus=photo
Filip009 (2024-05-21 07:12:21+00:00): Zdravím, prosím opravte názov, tak aby zodpovedal slovenskej gramatike.
felipeeugenio (2024-05-20 20:12:28+00:00): duplicado
felipeeugenio (2024-05-20 20:19:52+00:00): por favor no usar contracciones. escribir las palabras completas.
Y en addr:street va el nombre de la calle, no toda esa descripción que usó.
citrula (2024-05-21 05:41:22+00:00): Hello, I reverted this changeset because you connected a road across a railway, and dragged random nodes. Please be careful with the edits you make!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151609643
literan (2024-05-21 17:53:51+00:00): amenity=traffic_park 

тег для детского автогородка
eggie (2024-05-20 19:40:36+00:00): Dag Thijmen  Alleen een naam doet niet in OSM
club=sport 
sport=windsurfing
Meestal voeg ik leisure=sport_center toe of amenity=community_centre. (clubhuis) . anders rendert er nog niets.
De vlag moet wel de lading dekken. 
MVG
eggie
NeisBot (2024-05-20 19:30:04+00:00): Hi OpenBVEeditor, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1284956894

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
KlopanRin (2024-11-28 21:08:14+00:00): Looks suspicious because why would one map out a separate road just for a label saying that the road is closed just put access=no and barriers blocking entry to Rue de Neufvilles
Ziirish (2024-11-28 21:45:59+00:00): Because I have no idea what you are talking about. I submitted this change because I faced a closed/destroyed road during a bike trip. I sent out photos showing this and requested a review for the change because I wasn't sure how to fix this properly.
osmviborg (2024-05-21 04:27:09+00:00): source:maxspeed=sign
Filip009 (2024-05-21 07:16:19+00:00): Zdravím, k čomu to bola duplicita, nevidím na okolí nič podobné.
miluethi (2024-05-20 21:21:44+00:00): Hi Aswini,

Please square out buildings by pressing the "Q" key.

Thank you for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
Syl (2024-05-21 13:45:30+00:00): Bonjour, il manque un attribut principal pour définir ce que c'est. Et le numéro doit être au format international.
Syl (2024-05-21 13:45:44+00:00): Bonjour, il manque un attribut principal pour définir ce que c'est.
Syl (2024-06-22 18:02:45+00:00): Je viens de corriger
ottwiz (2024-05-20 19:47:52+00:00): This is more like mapping forests just forgot to change comment.
Glassman (2024-05-22 16:26:47+00:00): Most likely the road should be tagged as highway=service. The county does not have any record of a road there.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151598222
kuhni74 (2025-06-27 19:43:40+00:00): the track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1062921897 is tagged with "access=permissive" and "toll=yes" - this would mean that motor_vehicles are admitted if they are paid for?
kuhni74 (2025-06-30 09:53:59+00:00): access with toll has been quit, only forestry vehicles are admitted now (I was there)
Kookykooky (2025-07-07 04:17:58+00:00): thanks for adding information
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-20 20:10:19+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11920522927

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
MxxCon (2024-05-26 02:20:31+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you create this relation? East Tremont Avenue is already properly tagged as ways all the way through.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151598428
NorthCrab_upload (2024-05-20 20:10:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/960025815
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/960025816

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Glassman (2024-05-22 16:27:27+00:00): This also looks like a highway=service + service=driveway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151598466
Glassman (2024-05-22 16:27:40+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151598521
Flo-2 (2024-05-20 20:19:34+00:00): falsches attribut public-transport=entrance statt public_transport=entrance, wird behoben
Negreheb (2024-05-21 19:03:45+00:00): Wo hast du denn den Tag public_transport=entrance überhaupt her? Auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:public_transport ist davon nichts zu finden. 

Es wird auch im Forum schon besprochen - vielleicht möchtest du dich dazu melden? 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/public-transport-entrance-in-osterreich-changeset-151622329/113555
Glassman (2024-05-22 16:27:50+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151598600
MxxCon (2024-05-26 02:20:45+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you create this relation? West Tremont Avenue is already properly tagged as ways all the way through.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151598813
Glassman (2024-05-22 16:28:12+00:00): looks like a driveway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151598870
Geofreund1 (2024-05-29 12:38:32+00:00): Der Verlauf der Westtangente ist an der Einmündung Wildbader Straße (noch) nicht korrekt. Ich hatte ein fixme angebracht, das du gelöscht hast. Was ist der Grund dafür?
MxxCon (2024-05-26 02:22:21+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you create this relation? Relation of relations seems severely unnecessary here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151598904
VictorIE (2025-07-15 03:18:40+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10753824

name=Finglass Parish - should that be "Finglas"?
mcliquid (2024-05-21 06:59:00+00:00): Hi, du hast im Hau "motor_vehicle=yes" gesetzt. Bevor ich das wieder lösche, wieso denkst du, dass es da hin gehört?
Hier ein aktuelles Foto der Beschilderung vor Ort: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fahrradstra%C3%9Fe_M%C3%A4der.jpg

Das dort geltende Gesetz: https://www.jusline.at/gesetz/stvo/paragraf/67

Danke dir!
chris66 (2024-05-21 07:34:33+00:00): "sowie das Befahren zum Zweck des Zu- und Abfahrens."

Ah, dann wäre motor_vehicle=destination korrekt... 

Bis wo geht die Fahrradstraße, bis Zollweg 31?
chris66 (2024-05-21 07:40:46+00:00): Ohne Freigabe für motor_vehicle können jedenfalls die Häuser Zollweg 27-31 und die beiden Parkplätze nicht per Router erreicht werden.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=47.35506%2C9.62050%3B47.35563%2C9.61640
mcliquid (2024-05-21 08:17:15+00:00): Danke dir. Ich habe motor_vehicle=destination ergänzt. Wobei ich dann nicht den Unterschied zwischen der aktuellen Beschilderung ohne Zusatzzeichen sowie dem Zusatzzeichen "Anrainer frei" verstehe.
chris66 (2024-05-22 16:47:20+00:00): Da wird es vermutlich keinen großen Unterschied geben. Bei Bedarf bitte im Austria-Forum diskutieren. :-)
Noktoborus (2024-08-15 07:38:05+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Где Вы взяли названия для этой точки: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/360973887

Здесь нет водопада. Вероятно, Вы имели ввиду https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=rapids
Lokai (2024-05-21 17:11:07+00:00): Hallo,

sie verändern u.a. footway zu cycleway.

Welche Schilder befinden sich vor Ort, der Vormapper hat das anders gesehen. Wurden dort Schilder verändert?

Zur Info:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

Gruß
L.
MxxCon (2024-05-26 02:25:27+00:00): Hello.
Should "construction:" prefix be removed from some of these ways?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151600525
s13579 (2024-05-27 19:09:51+00:00): Hey, I realized the same thing and removed the construction tag in a subsequent commit. I don't believe OSM lets you squash commits as you might do in git so I just created a new changeset with the removal of the tag.
s13579 (2024-05-27 19:11:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151607192 Here's that changeset with the construction prefix removed
MxxCon (2024-05-27 19:12:59+00:00): Alright 👍🙂
MrSev (2024-05-20 21:22:50+00:00): The Street names from the local council web site.
https://jf-armacaodepera.com/file/zRlbTs8AxaJqwT7X
MrSev (2024-05-20 21:22:43+00:00): The Street names from the local council web site.
https://jf-armacaodepera.com/file/zRlbTs8AxaJqwT7X
MrSev (2024-05-20 21:22:38+00:00): The Street names from the local council web site.
https://jf-armacaodepera.com/file/zRlbTs8AxaJqwT7X
MrSev (2024-05-20 21:22:31+00:00): The Street names from the local council web site.
https://jf-armacaodepera.com/file/zRlbTs8AxaJqwT7X
MrSev (2024-05-20 21:22:23+00:00): The Street names from the local council web site.
https://jf-armacaodepera.com/file/zRlbTs8AxaJqwT7X
MrSev (2024-05-20 21:22:12+00:00): The Street names from the local council web site.
https://jf-armacaodepera.com/file/zRlbTs8AxaJqwT7X
robby_rumble (2024-07-23 04:36:11+00:00): What is the purpose of mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284981684 and marking it as bikable when it's in the middle of a railyard? 

I've contacted you multiple times about your sloppy editing and nothing has changed. I'd love to understand why this continues to happen and how to prevent it in the future.
nickvet419 (2024-07-23 08:02:10+00:00): I've already answered your question, I do not control the default setting for the editors apps. If a way is not accessible by bike, simply mark it so an move on, if that is what you are focused on. I'm not going to spot check every way marked for accessibility set by the default tags.
nickvet419 (2024-07-23 08:08:59+00:00): the issue seems to be with the app you are using. the highway=path tag does not default add bicycle=yes, but if the app you are using makes them appear that way, you should contact the app creator.
robby_rumble (2024-07-23 14:17:22+00:00): highway=path defaults to bicycles=yes which is correct. The issue here is that you've drawn a highway=path with allowed access=all in the middle of the Union Pacific railyard.
Hufkratzer (2024-05-20 22:50:57+00:00): Hi,
das ist keine Reitanlage, das ist eine Führanlage. Kann man mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:animal=horse_walker taggen. (Dafür gibt's aber keni Preset.)
Interteutones (2024-05-21 10:15:17+00:00): Hi, Führanlage hatte ich schon eingangs gesucht, aber nicht gefunden. Auch jetzt nicht. Ich habe meinen Eintrag nun wieder gelöscht.
Hufkratzer (2024-05-21 12:02:50+00:00): Das finde ich besser, als Tags falsch zu verwenden. Das Problem mit dem fehlenden Preset ist bekannt, siehe https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/835
Interteutones (2024-05-21 12:09:30+00:00): Noch besser wäre es, wenn die korrekte Bezeichnung hier angeboten würde.
Gruß
Hufkratzer (2024-05-21 12:13:30+00:00): Verstehe ich nicht. Was soll wo angegeben werden?
Interteutones (2024-05-21 12:18:03+00:00): In der ID Auswahlliste. Ich arbeite nur auf dieser Ebene.
Hufkratzer (2024-05-21 22:25:50+00:00): Ja, das wäre noch besser. Deswegen gibt es https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/835

Du hast doch oben geschrieben, dass du das Ding gelöscht hast. Wieso ist es dann jetzt noch da?
Interteutones (2024-05-21 22:36:19+00:00): ich habe im Nachhinein noch daran gebastelt und es dann vergessen wieder zu löschen.
Hufkratzer (2024-05-20 23:00:19+00:00): Hi,
You have removed the building tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/503180463 and now this building is no longer rendered as a building. It seems you have choosen the wrong tag; there is also a tag for indoor arenas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=riding_hall
trigpoint (2025-06-08 13:19:30+00:00): Due to your dodgy mapping OSMand was trying to sen me on a long diversion as you have rendered Aston by Stone Crossing un-routable by your addition of lift gates (tagging for the renderer?).
Please don't do that, level crossing barriers are mapped as and attribute to the level crossing. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=level%20crossing?uselang=en
Also the crossing tag you have added is for pedestrians to cross the road, not a railway crossing. This is a mistake I would expect from a beginner.
Cheers Phil
Mauls (2025-06-08 13:25:16+00:00): I didn’t add the highway crossing tag. There is a history feature you can use to check which changeset made an edit.
trigpoint (2025-06-08 14:13:38+00:00): Sorry about that, I should have gone back further. 
Although the main issue was the lift gates.
Mauls (2025-06-08 17:01:48+00:00): I don't see it saying anywhere that barrier=lift_gate is not for level crossing barriers. A UK level crossing's lifting barrier gates is literally the picture used to illustrate the tag.

Are you trying to tag for a router?
Stylez995 (2024-05-21 07:31:16+00:00): Hei Magnode. Du har kanskje ikke visst at det fantes en duplikat linje i samme strekning på brua: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640227986. Jeg har fjernet duplikaten som er nyere enn den opprinnelig, og bruker den opprinnelige og oppdaterte taggene også). Også i norsk egennavn, ulik den engelske "title case", skriver vi ikke stor forbokstav i hvert ord unntatt det første ordet, dvs. "Randklev bru", ikke "Ranbdklev Bru".
Stylez995 (2024-05-21 07:32:50+00:00): Korrigering til forrige kommentar, jeg mente strekning https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281573430.
NeisBot (2024-05-20 22:20:03+00:00): Hi MikeBellman, welcome to OSM!

Thank you for your contribution to the map. I've reviewed your recent edits regarding the addition of a beach and noticed a few inconsistencies with the surrounding environment features. It appears that the location you've labeled as a beach does not match typical geographical characteristics I would expect for such a feature.

Your beach feature:
https://osm.org/way/1284988432

Could you please clarify:
- The source about this beach
- Any additional context about this location that might explain the unusual designation.

Looking forward to your response!

#BeachCheck
MikeBellman (2024-05-21 14:34:27+00:00): That’s fair. This is a runoff pond and that small extension gets a lot of its water from the pond uphill. So that extension area often drains pretty low and it’s where people use it to launch their boats or go fishing as it is regularly dry.

I know we are not a coastal area, but I noticed that the boat launches that we’re not official ramps in my area were classified as beach in a couple other parts of town so I was just mirroring that aspect. If that goes against community guidelines, I completely apologize. I’m only trying to edit areas that I know have a significance that I can identify visually.
pitscheplatsch (2024-05-21 17:28:37+00:00): Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/151614457
gpserror (2024-05-21 02:09:35+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
ablevi202 (2024-05-21 04:27:25+00:00): why did you remove the highway tag for hamlin avenue north? I've already put it back