piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Johlo6 (2026-05-26 18:04:04+00:00): Áno, tiež som si to všimol.
Už som to opravil.
Dík za upozornenie.
nevw (2026-05-26 13:07:38+00:00): Hi, which unit in this complex do you occupy?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-27 03:41:19+00:00): valid edit in this case, "source:bicykle -> source:bicycle" fix

see http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=183208096
kingkingHK (2026-05-27 03:02:03+00:00): Is it not addressed as Hollywood Road?
Kovoschiz (2026-05-27 08:56:38+00:00): It's both (so I avoided adding `addr:street=` after others)
kingkingHK (2026-05-30 06:24:59+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183384706
kingkingHK (2026-05-27 03:01:36+00:00): Are you sure?
kingkingHK (2026-05-30 06:27:08+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183384741
ika-chan! (2026-05-27 00:31:11+00:00): Hello, the service road at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1522688629 has been removed because there is no physical separation (not even hatched lines), according to Mapillary imagery: please only map roads that physically exist.
osmviborg (2026-05-26 13:33:52+00:00): Minus Skarø
Anders L (2026-06-03 14:30:19+00:00): Men igen, hvorfor to ens instanser af Hjortøfærgen???
osmviborg (2026-06-03 14:40:03+00:00): Nu er der kun en.
guillemmal (2026-05-27 09:28:56+00:00): Estimado buenos días, el cambio ha sido revertido ya que no sigue las buenas prácticas de mapeo al ser algo temporal. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
Cualquier duda estoy a disposición, lo mismo desde la comunidad argentina OSM, puedes encontrarnos en Telegram.
Saludos!
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-27 03:38:54+00:00): removal was valid, but tag was not misspelled at all
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-27 03:38:18+00:00): Please, read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments and use more clear ones
mueschel (2026-05-27 06:28:56+00:00): For "normal" changesets I write proper comments, but not when I insert a single character in a single object with just two tags. Everybody  can easily see what happens even without comment. I could also write "fix spelling mistake in key. $User wrote $wrong instead of $right which I fixed by adding a $character" - takes a lot of time and doesn't help anybody.
eggie (2026-05-26 14:41:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback .. hole=1 ?? 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
HoleIO (2026-05-26 14:54:30+00:00): Thanks, het betreft hier de putting green voor hole 1. Ik zag zo snel geen benamingen of conventies voor golfbanen, ik zal de tips straks er op naslaan.
eggie (2026-05-26 14:59:20+00:00): Hier wat info
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
Jakka (2026-05-26 15:14:46+00:00): Vos correction maisons 14/15 pas correcte. Forme maison/building avec contact sole. Pas le terrain complet
bxl-forever (2026-05-26 15:52:24+00:00): The changeset has been reverted.

Buildings on OpenStreetMap must be the exact outline of the built surface.  Buildings should never be traced from aerial images, instead users should manually select the UrbIS numerical background.  This is why we restored the official shape here.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Buildings
Gaung Tebono (2026-05-26 19:56:40+00:00): Maaf typo "edot" seharusnya "edit" malah jadi "edot" 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🤣🤣🤣

Sorry for the typo, "edot" should be "edit" but instead it became "edot" 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🤣🤣🤣
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-27 03:37:44+00:00): in this case removal was justified, but NOT because it was misspelled

misspelled ones should be fixed, not removed
infeeeee (2026-06-19 13:15:48+00:00): Szia! A facebook oldal címe megfelelően szerepel a contact:facebook=* címkében, ne rakd vissza a honlapnak, ráadásul ez átirányítás, nem az oldal címe. Köszi! 

További jó térképezést! Ezt visszavontam.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184315689
cubbe8 (2026-05-26 23:25:27+00:00): This is not a secondary road per https://gis.data.mass.gov/datasets/massgis::massgis-massdot-roads/explore?filters=eyJDTEFTUyI6WzEsNl0sIkZfQ0xBU1MiOlszLDNdfQ%3D%3D&location=42.377309%2C-71.028930%2C17

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183232233
Konrad95 (2026-06-02 16:25:50+00:00): Wycofałem zmianę z powodu zdublowania istniejących obiektów w: changeset/183554631 Więcej na ten temat w 1. komentarzu pod: changeset/183250298
fortera_au (2026-05-26 23:37:35+00:00): Hi, what are you using to determine the content of tanks?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183210854
BholeKiBhasam (2026-05-27 10:26:20+00:00): g'day, that's a reasonable point and appreciate that..but using the structure like farmland and house and the pipes connected from roof top to tanks....may be they are water tanks...anyhow will try to use storage tanks for the ones on farmlands or away from house/buildings...and to verify rainwater harvesting, me did some search if such practice is allowed or followed in that specific regions and learnt that it is very common practice to harvest rain water across Au...please do correct my mapping any time, but sometime, might not be able to reply on time...have good days ahead
fortera_au (2026-05-27 11:08:40+00:00): Thanks for the explanation. If you do think you can determine it from aerial imagery then that's fine, I mostly just wanted to see if there was a way it was determined or if it was just picked from a preset.
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-26 17:43:50+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1449892565

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
rempshaener (2026-05-26 19:26:06+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Ich habe nur eine Anmerkung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10021573675: Es ist eine gute Idee, den Node nicht einfach zu löschen. Das Risiko wäre groß, dass jemand auf Grund der Straßenkappe eine erneute Eintragung vornimmt. Jetzt halten Datennutzer das Objekt aber immer noch für einen Hydranten. Daher einfach aus dem emergency=fire_hydrant ein disused:emergency=fire_hydrant machen und dann später bei Bedarf löschen.
Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Viele Grüße
schobbish (2026-05-26 14:39:57+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183212510
eggie (2026-05-26 14:43:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM
Wellicht?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Devents_venue
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Tom de Lepper (2026-05-28 09:24:27+00:00): Hi Eggie,

ik heb het toevoegd, dank voor de tip! Ik navigeer vaker via Flitsmeister, en ik begreep dat zij OSM gebruiken om adressen/bedrijfsnamen te laden? Ik ben benieuwd of deze er straks tussen staat. 
Groetjes Tom
eggie (2026-05-28 09:34:47+00:00): Dag Tom.. Het is in ieder geval vindbaar.
Niet te veel naar de 'standaardkaart' kijken. Die rendert heel veel niet. Die kaartlagen zijn van derde partijen.
Mvg,
eggie
eggie (2026-05-26 14:47:55+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Op een wandelpad routeert het alleen voor wandelaars. Al die accesstags zijn dus niet nodig.
Het routeert hier echt niet voor iets met wielen.
MVG
eggie
mueschel (2026-05-28 18:28:59+00:00): Hi,
"noconstruction" is not a common prefix. You can use "construction" instead - even if these features are not newly constructed but just restored after construction finished.
literan (2026-05-26 19:23:55+00:00): Вы продолжаете, уже под новой учетной записью, хаотично сдвигать объекты (в том числе здания на местоположение их крыш). Не тратьте время, все подобные вредоносные правки будут откачены
AleAleVa (2026-05-26 21:25:00+00:00): Здравствуйте. Это во-первых.
А во-вторых, под "хаотично сдвигать объекты" вы подразумеваете что конкретно? Пример, хоть один приведите, где было все в порядке, а стало "хаотично". Если вы считаете, что вы главный смотрящий за этим участком карты, то плохо смотрите - у вас дом №8 по ул. Кубинка вообще не существовал на карте, зато был нарисован несуществующий заезд на эстакаду и так далее. Если приведение в порядок вы называете "хаотичным передвиганием", то извините... 
И в-третьих, про здания и крыши мне известно не хуже вашего уже лет 10+ тому как. Примеры давайте, их и обсудим.
literan (2026-05-27 06:23:16+00:00): 1) Примеры - хотя бы здания 4 и 6 по Кубинке, которые вы сдвинули на местоположение их крыш (а должны быть контуры дома по метоположению на снимках их "подошв".

2) Вы знаете что такое смещение снимков? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Использование_аэрофотоснимков#Спутниковые_снимки_и_OSM

Вы перед правкой привязали используемые вами снимки к трекам? Какое смещение по x и y у вас получилось?

Вы используете снимки Mapbox, они в Москве устаревшие и сильно смещены

3) Я никакой не "главный" или "смотрящий", таковых в ОСМ нет. Дом 8 кто-то удалил, восстановлю.
silversurfer83 (2026-05-27 16:54:24+00:00): Moin,

du hast hier ein Gebäude gelöscht, welches auf dem aktuellen NRW DOP und dem Liegenschaftskataster klar erkennbar ist.

Warum tust du das?

Grüße

silversurfer83
ckruse (2026-05-27 18:48:47+00:00): Sorry, das Gebäude sollte nicht gelöscht werden. Nur die umliegende Nutzungsfläche.
Danke für die Info
silversurfer83 (2026-05-27 19:12:20+00:00): Danke für die flotte Rückmeldung.

Weißt du, wie man eine Löschung rückgängig macht oder soll ich das für dich machen?
silversurfer83 (2026-06-06 09:38:23+00:00): So. Das Gebäude ist wieder da.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183729898

Ich warte immernoch auf Antwort in dieser Änderung:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183212874#c1600298
silversurfer83 (2026-05-27 20:38:37+00:00): if we don't know what's allowed we don't set any access=* tags. A general "yes" allows everything. Don't do that if you don't know what's really allowed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183212605
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-06-02 14:20:58+00:00): Understood. Thank you for the clarification.
eggie (2026-05-26 14:49:38+00:00): Dag MuseumEiland.
Dit is niet correct. Het is geen straatnaam.
Ik zal name= veranderen in description. U kunt beter een bordje neerzetten met dergelijke tekst.

MVG
eggie
validator OSM
silversurfer83 (2026-05-27 16:57:26+00:00): Und nochmal ich,

dieser Weg wurde erst vor Kurzem von einem zuverlässigen Mapper in die Datenbank eingetragen. Auch auf dem Digitalen Höhenmodell von NRW (DTM Hillshade) ist ein gut ausgebauter Feld/Waldweg zu erkennen.

Warum löscht du diesen Weg?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183212874
MenKauRa (2026-05-28 20:48:44+00:00): Please return everything to the way it was... Otherwise, I'll do it myself as soon as I find the time and have the opportunity...
evgenykatyshev (2026-05-29 05:23:43+00:00): What is your concern? What was removed is the name of the settlement where POIs are located. It was manually reviewed, and no AI has been involved.

The old way of tagging is incorrect. If you want, I can not remove the part after backslash, but move the settlement name to another temporary tag. I use the note:original_name tag for reviewing before uploading.
evgenykatyshev (2026-05-29 05:26:46+00:00): Since the bulk change hasn't been approved yet, I'm going to perform the changes in smaller bunches with manual review
MenKauRa (2026-05-29 05:33:31+00:00): I'm concerned about the biased and undisguised interest with which you're concentrating all your efforts on the map of my country, Azerbaijan, and specifically on my editing. I ask you once again - return everything to the way it was... otherwise, I'll do it...
evgenykatyshev (2026-05-29 05:46:33+00:00): Please share your concerns with the community on the forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-proposal-for-bulk-name-changing-in-azerbaijan-prepared-with-ai-assistance/144111 as well. I won't make other changes for a while.
MenKauRa (2026-05-29 06:03:21+00:00): I will share my concerns in the forum thread when I deem it necessary... but for now I only ask you... obviously, the reactions of users in the thread that you have inflated are not in favor of your arguments, and I am already convinced that this state of affairs is pushing you to actions that you have not fully comprehended...
evgenykatyshev (2026-05-29 06:12:32+00:00): I've seen only concerns about the proposed mass update, which could contain mistakes, especially AI-related. I haven't seen arguments against removing settlement names from the POI's names.

I've shared all the test changes I've made in the forum thread. If there is a unanimous decision to revert them, I'll revert.
Comino (2026-05-26 16:20:07+00:00): Hi,

In your edit you use the deprecated tag "payment:bitcoin=yes".

Please DELETE the payment:bitcoin=yes tag !
Use the "currency:XBT=yes" instead.

For more information please read: https://gitea.btcmap.org/teambtcmap/btcmap-general/wiki/Tagging-Merchants#tagging-guidance
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bitcoin

Your description-tag with advertisement is not allowed. Please also delete.

For more assistance you can email me if needed.

Happy mapping,

Edwin Comino
BTC Map
edwin@btcmap.org
dp7 (2026-05-27 08:33:36+00:00): Ciao Carlo
Il tag NAME va utilizzato solo per indicare il nome proprio di un oggetto, non la descrizione. Va quindi bene il nome dell'agriturismo o quello di una via, ma non è corretto usarlo per indicazioni generiche come "cisterna d'acqua", "recinzione coltivazione more", "fontanile" ecc. In questi casi se ritieni comunque necessario inserire l'informazione, usa il tag DESCRIPTION. Tieni comunque presente che l'informazione è spesso insita nell'oggetto stesso, come nel caso del fontanile, e quindi non serve aggiungere altro. Grazie
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-16 15:01:12+00:00): К сожалению 2гис для правок использовать нельзя
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-26 17:43:12+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/282935896

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2026-05-27 13:16:32+00:00): poprawiono
confusedbuffalo (2026-05-26 17:54:02+00:00): It looks like something went wrong for an empty changeset to be created. Maybe you can let me know what you were doing so I can see if there's something that needs fixing?
And also how you managed to group over 10000 changes into one changeset
❤️‍🔥 (2026-05-27 13:25:54+00:00): oh sorry for the confusion, i ended up editing that changeset in excel (since it was more efficient) and then manually uploading it with the osm api. 

so it's not a problem with your awesome tool haha, my fault
confusedbuffalo (2026-05-27 13:36:36+00:00): No worries, I just keep an eye on osmcha for changesets with my editor in case of any issues
NorthCrab_upload (2026-05-26 17:43:23+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Klucz addr:place oznacza brak nazwy ulicy. Kombinacja z addr:street (który definiuje nazwę ulicy) jest błędna.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305175777

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
WieKo68 (2026-05-27 13:17:09+00:00): poprawiono
eggie (2026-05-26 17:46:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback tunnel heb ik aangepast naar building_passage. layer=0  is default.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Nico Elbers (2026-05-28 13:17:22+00:00): Thanks, ik had hem op tunnel gezet omdat het pad de andere kant op ook als tunnel stond. Misschien moet die dan ook aangepast worden
eggie (2026-05-28 13:30:05+00:00): Hoi..Het is ook een tunneltag..
..tunnel=building_passage

Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-05-26 17:49:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
habi (2026-05-26 17:21:58+00:00): Ciao 

Hier hast du dem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1522834094 `roof:orientation=along` und `roof:shape=round` vergeben, was für einen Weg sicher falsch ist, und auch für ein Gebäude keinen Sinn macht :)

Dazu hast du noch https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13883958349 erfasst, mit "nur" 
`addr:housename=Gebetsstätte`, was für sich alleine grad etwas gar dürftig ist.

Leider ist aus den swisstopo Lufbildern und dem 3D-Geländemodell nicht erkennbar, was genau verbessert werden könnte, magst du dem nochmals nachgehen?

Gruss,
habi

PS: Ich bin hier wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5311412
Tischlehr (2026-06-02 15:52:17+00:00): Moin,

Vielen Dank für die Infos, hatte es direkt gelöst. Sollte jetzt so passen (schau es dir gern nochmal an).

Viele Grüße Tischlehr
Nakaner-repair (2026-06-09 09:51:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183866122, 183866141, 183866143, 183866127 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by ticki_52 since CS 183039302, see https://c.osm.org/t/144453 for details
mavl (2026-06-07 06:01:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 183764451, 183764460, 183764431, 183764453, 183764448, 183764459, 183764455 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20768].
Pieter Vander Vennet (2026-05-28 21:17:29+00:00): Hey m_fuhrmann,

I did unlink two of your images, as they contained a bit too much kids (of which I want to prevent the privacy). Additionally, the blurring broke down as a part of the face was covered in the image. Sorry about this!

Kind regards,
Pietervdvn
silversurfer83 (2026-05-27 16:48:25+00:00): Moin

das, was du hier erfasst hast, sieht aktuell wie ein Bahnhof mit Betrieb aus.

Wenn ich mir die vorhandenen Bilder (Luft, WikiCommons) ansehe, dann sehe ich hier keinen Bahnbetrieb.

Alles, was hier ungenutzt ist (station, platform, whatever) sollte in dem Fall dringend auf disused gesetzt werden.

Grüße

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183216892
dzamper (2026-05-27 21:17:14+00:00): Tyle że to nie jest droga ekspresowa
Dawid2849 (2026-05-28 14:20:20+00:00): Stoi tam trójzakaz, ale ruch pieszych nie jest zabroniony: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.291249899801&lng=18.75011102664&z=17&pKey=848316705767837&focus=photo&x=0.506303880631945&y=0.4963196019454371&zoom=0
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-05-27 10:35:32+00:00): Good catch, thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2026-05-27 10:36:39+00:00): There is asphalt all the way now too. I updated the surface. The closed road/local traffic only sign is still there between Coteau-du-Trèfle Sud and Salaberry. I added a note.
TrickyFoxy (2026-07-18 00:29:58+00:00): 👋 Не вносите личные заметки в OpenStreetMap. Используйте раздел Метки в приложении
mueschel (2026-05-27 18:17:59+00:00): Please check your imports. It's "building", not "builidng".
Gustavo22Soares (2026-05-27 18:36:30+00:00): Fixed thanks
eggie (2026-05-26 17:52:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback  Ik heb het aangepast naar drinking_water.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
idkwhatname2use (2026-05-27 20:27:09+00:00): Hello, this was marked as proposed, and its the official policy of the state to construct this in the future along here... is there any other reason to not include this other than time wise? There currently is a bill in the legislature to open up funding for this, its not like it wont exist within the typical lifetime...
LAX_maps (2026-05-27 23:20:49+00:00): you should probably watch every YouTube video about the keywords ""CAHSR is bad"  (plus there is even the possibility that the whole rail line won't even exist because the train is going too fast at 220 mph)
LAX_maps (2026-06-04 19:42:37+00:00): are you still here?
gurglypipe (2026-05-26 20:12:12+00:00): Hiya, thanks for trying to improve the map. It was actually fine here — access tagging for public rights of way is separate from tagging the physical attributes of the way (whether it’s a track or path or road).

It’s necessarily a bit complicated because of the complexity of UK rights of way law, but reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom#First_map_the_feature should hopefully explain it a bit :)

Essentially, designation=public_footpath and foot=designated mark this as a public footpath. access=private sets the default access (e.g. for vehicles) and is overridden by foot=designated for foot access.

I’ve undone your changes as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183227358

Happy to answer any questions if you have any.
RowanP (2026-05-27 13:58:05+00:00): HI. I put the track on the map about a month ago because the footpath  (which I have walked),  on the Ordnance Survey map is not on OSM. I noticed that what I had put on OSM did not look like the other paths in the area so I went in again to edit it to look like a footpath. It needs to be obviously a public access footpath to join the one going past Henry's Castle just NE of the square.
gurglypipe (2026-05-27 15:20:54+00:00): I think I see what’s happening here. The map you see on openstreetmap.org is one rendering of the underlying data. It uses a certain map style across the entire world. That style cannot accommodate the UK’s weird separation between rights of way and the physical path/track/nothing on the ground, so sometimes it’s not clear from what you see on openstreetmap.org as to what the legal right of way is.

The solution to this is to use a rendering of the OSM data which is aware of the UK’s access laws. For example, https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#17/54.31156/-2.80886

Many mobile navigation apps which use OSM data should pick up the footpath designation correctly and render it appropriately.
gurglypipe (2026-05-27 16:27:18+00:00): I see you’ve made the same changes again in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183263718.

Unless I’m missing something about the state of the track on the ground, the tagging was correct before. Please don’t change it just to make the map look like how you think it should look, that’s https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer.

If it’s physically a track that a vehicle would drive up (with permission), then the correct tagging is:

highway=track
access=private (to set the default access permissions)
foot=designated
designation=public_footpath

OSM doesn’t just exist to map UK footpaths, it exists to map everything, including farm tracks and their access provisions. Unless I’ve misunderstood the state of the track on the ground (and the aerial imagery is wrong) then this should be highway=track not highway=footway.

If you think I’ve made a mistake, please explain your reasoning. Thanks.