piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Baloo Uriza (2025-09-19 13:52:39+00:00): I updated this with the correct tags for a hangar.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172163149
eggie (2025-09-19 14:47:24+00:00): Dag P@LO

Probeer concreet aan te geven wat je hebt aangepast.
Dus pad verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-19 14:55:28+00:00): Merged info with addresnode
mavl (2025-11-23 07:40:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175015324 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18891].
NeisBot (2025-09-19 14:00:41+00:00): Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM!

Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping descriptions concise, factual, and free from marketing or promotional language.

Could you please revise your description accordingly?

#MapWithoutSpam #Tags #Description
NeisReview (2025-09-27 07:08:42+00:00): ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/172195879
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-12 08:12:53+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for Dogtopia POI in changeset 184004573

https://osm.org/changeset/184004573
vasony (2025-09-21 11:33:12+00:00): Szia!

Salgótarján, Zsázsa utca és Torma utca létezését (kiépítettségét) ilyen formán nem igazolja vissza a műholdkép, mi a forrása?

Tamás
Térképszerkesztő (2025-09-22 10:51:13+00:00): Szia Tamás!

Ezek külön helyrajzi számmal rendelkező kiszolgáló utak (24007 és 23990).

Üdv,
Zoli
vasony (2025-09-22 17:55:03+00:00): Szia!

A hész-ben valóban vannak ezek, de nem oda húztad a vonalakat ahol ezek vannak.

ld: https://snipboard.io/rgfVH9.jpg

Biztos vagy benne, hogy ki vannak építve, mert a műholdképen csak erdő látszik.
Ha nincs kiépítve, akkor highway=proposed

T
Térképszerkesztő (2025-09-23 12:04:47+00:00): Szia!

A típust módosítottam, a HRSZ alapján azonban ezek az utcák a TSZT (https://snipboard.io/X0nqWN.jpg) és a MEPAR (https://snipboard.io/wmRrQ1.jpg) szerint is merőlegesek a 23981 HRSZ-ú Tárkony utcára, nem pedig 75 fokos szöget zárnak be vele.
vasony (2025-09-23 19:22:17+00:00): Egyetértünk, hogy nem 75 fok, azért tettem be a képet, de te rajzoltad 75 fokban :) Javítottam a geometriákat illetve a maradékot átraktam proposedra, 1 utcanév még hiányzik, ha megvan esetleg, pont a 23981 hrsz.
wies1 (2025-09-19 14:03:30+00:00): Fehler bei der Kommentarangabe

Richtig:

Building and addresses

source:

GWR Swisstopo 2ß25
balint36 (2025-09-22 18:01:38+00:00): Szia! Ezzel a módosításoddal a soroksári OBI előtt két pontot is elmozgattál, így a pontokhoz tartozó utat keresztbehúztad. A hibás módosítást visszavonom.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172308870
babotche (2025-09-19 14:23:01+00:00): Could not find the restricted byway
Gregory Peony (2025-09-19 20:29:37+00:00): Hi, every footprint you added here represents a building and is correctly shaped. These footprints could have been mapped more accurately. See how I mapped them in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172181039 Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172165368
Kraan46 (2025-09-21 11:46:01+00:00): With the quality of the available imagery, it seems to me we could argue forever about who's right here. Your comment therefore feels rather demotivating. Please don't bother my inbox with these kinds of comments anymore.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172165368
Gregory Peony (2025-10-11 23:58:59+00:00): I agree that the quality of the imagery here is not as good as the changeset I was originally commenting on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171738491, however I see what I think are inaccuracies and am sharing my interpretation to discuss mapping, not "argue" or start an edit war.

I wrote my comments after reviewing your contributions and go off of what I can see. I am not spamming, nor am I a mind reader; I cannot exhaustively know what what you would find bothersome in advance, therefore this is an unreasonable expectation. Ultimately if you make a contribution to OSM, then it is open for discussion by defualt.
Kraan46 (2025-10-12 08:00:22+00:00): Noted. Please refrain from sending me long comments and filling my mailbox with long mails. Stay to the point in short sentences. And preferably write your comments in the Task Manager. Reading your comments here is time consuming because i need to open it in another program which is confusing.  I will not read them in the future.
Gregory Peony (2025-10-12 20:21:57+00:00): I like to explain the why, but I will try to be as brief as possible in future.

I comment on changesets sometimes, becasue they are more specific than tasks. You yourself have commented on others' changesets. Not everyone contributes via a tasking manager, so others already have and possibly will communicate with you via OSM.
osmviborg (2025-09-19 14:26:53+00:00): Adressepunkter i Danmark importeres automatisk fra DAR. Undlad at lave manuelle ændringer i dem. https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Da:Adresser
HellMap (2025-09-19 16:55:12+00:00): Šiem vārtiem https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8147587937 ar access tegiem te sanāk dīvaini, ja gan `vehicle`, gan `foot` ir `no`, jo tas faktiski aizliedz visiem (izņemot zirgus). Ja tā, tad te vienkārši `access=no` būtu. Man gan liekas tur var privātie braukt un iet vai arī es nepareizi sapratu domu?
user_23259244 (2025-09-19 17:51:44+00:00): Sveiks, Citi lietotāji kļūdās slēdzot maģistrāles ;) es tikai vārtus :)
Izlaboju.
mavl (2025-11-23 07:40:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 175015324 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18891].
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-14 06:36:53+00:00): Hello! Do you know is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103568293 still under reconstruction?
wonderb0lt (2025-09-19 14:23:03+00:00): *repair station, typo in description
bartgron (2025-09-20 16:06:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
javbw (2026-02-13 04:51:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13155676882/history#map=19/36.334469/139.319071

Be more careful when mapping around power wires. The landuse=industrial is badly mapped. the Bing imagery is very clear, yet this landuse polygon is sloppy and inaccurate. When mapping, carefully choose your way points and make sure to not accidently connect them to power lines, houses, or other ways you do not mean to connect them to.
Phil2604 (2025-09-19 14:43:28+00:00): Ajout du DAB (ATM) de la Caisse d’Epargne qui se situe au 2 avenue Paul Loubet
Tallguy (2025-10-05 21:33:52+00:00): Hi @camilleMa, could you have a look into this change please - you appear to have altered;
  Avenue Verte which should have the ref AV, extends between London & Paris,  and be coloured green, and
  North Sea Cycle Route which should be reference EV12 and coloured red. In the UK this extends up the East Coast and does not go into London.  
It may be easiest to have your change reverted.

Regards

Nick (Tallguy)
Tallguy (2025-10-06 13:18:16+00:00): Update on my comment - The North Sea Cycle route only passes into East & North London on its continued journey North. 
The Avenue Verte terminates at the London Eye in London.
SomeoneElse (2025-10-06 21:55:43+00:00): I've changed the tags on these AV relations, so that https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2820043 is now AV and so is  the AV superroute containing both parts, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2820053 .
The EV12 superroute in the UK is entirely separate - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9476239 .  That goes via a bunch of national NCN routes as well as some dedicated EV12 ones.
SomeoneElse (2025-10-06 22:08:53+00:00): Bonjour @camillMa,

La configuration de ces relations dans OpenStreetMap (à la fois « EV » et, dans une moindre mesure, « AV ») est un peu confuse. N'hésitez pas à nous contacter si vous avez des questions. En particulier, il est difficile de voir quelle relation vous modifiez avec l'éditeur « iD » du navigateur, et il est facile de se tromper, car le numéro de relation n'est presque jamais affiché.

Cordialement,

Andy
camilleMa (2025-10-14 15:21:12+00:00): hello
j'étais en congé et je ne vois vos messages qu'aujourd'hui. Je suis désolée, je me suis effectivement trompée entre l'EV12 et l'AV... dois je faire quelque chose pour reverter mes modif ? comment dois je faire ?
SomeoneElse (2025-10-14 17:22:23+00:00): No problem - I think I've corrected the problems earlier
SomeoneElse (2025-10-14 17:23:02+00:00): Pas de problème, je pense avoir corrigé les problèmes plus tôt
felipeeugenio (2025-09-20 14:36:18+00:00): revertido
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172167168
charl3s (2025-10-09 12:08:57+00:00): naprawde zamknęli 4 powiawtówki? To aż niemożliwe
AndyB_66 (2025-10-09 12:15:38+00:00): Tak - ale mają lada chwila ponownie otworzyć 3269Lpo bypassie: https://www.kronikatygodnia.pl/artykul/50010,s17-w-budowie-mieszkancy-gminy-labunie-odcieci-od-swiata-zablokowano-trzy-drogi-naraz
felipeeugenio (2025-09-20 14:36:22+00:00): revertido
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172167418
mga_geo (2025-09-20 06:32:19+00:00): Bonjour,
Attention ! segmenter un rond-point conduit généralement à casser la continuité du trajet des relations route=bus.
Au moins les relations  r4009132,r366308,r1260667,r4033329,r4033330,r4033331 viennent d'être cassées.
Pouvez-vous les rétablir ?
Bon courage
Marc
RomainDC (2025-09-20 14:53:07+00:00): Bonjour Marc,
Merci pour la remarque, je vais corriger ça

Romain
felipeeugenio (2025-09-20 14:36:24+00:00): revertido
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172167592
無限の刃 (2025-10-12 06:53:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:leisure%3Dpitch
okadatsuneo (2025-10-12 08:16:06+00:00): 学校のグラウンドをpeisure=pitchとするのは昔日本のコミュニティで質問して、「pitchを使う」と聞いたのでそうしています。
amenity=schoolのwikiにも「leisure=pitchを運動場のタグ付けに使う」と文章で記載されています。
ただし、amenity=schoolのwikiの図にamenity=recreation_groundのエリアも書かれているので、運動場のどの部分をpitchにするかは解釈は分かれるかもしれません。
ただ、「まるっきり間違い」というわけでもないので、すでに書かれているものはそのままにしていただけると、編集合戦にはならないかと思います。
質問や意見表明などはコミュニティの方にお願いします。
無限の刃 (2025-10-14 07:55:07+00:00): >amenity=schoolのwikiにも「leisure=pitchを運動場のタグ付けに使う」と文章で記載されています。
タグはイギリス英語であり、英語版では「leisure=pitch is used for individual sports pitches. Where an individual sport can be identified, sport=* and surface=grass/asphalt/... can be added.」と記述され、日本語記事では『JA:Tag:leisure=pitch』の
「leisure=pitch タグは 競技場(ピッチ, フィールド) をマッピングするために使います。このエリアは特定のスポーツを実施するために設計された場所で、ふつうは白線などによって適切に表示が行われています。たとえばテニスコート、バスケットボールコート、野球場、乗馬場などがこれにあたります。 」
が正確です。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E3%82%A6%E3%82%A3%E3%82%AD%E3%81%AE%E3%82%AC%E3%82%A4%E3%83%89%E3%83%A9%E3%82%A4%E3%83%B3#%E8%A8%80%E8%AA%9E
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:leisure%3Dpitch
osmviborg (2025-09-19 15:06:32+00:00): Igen, adressepunkter i Danmark importeres automatisk fra DAR. Undlad at lave manuelle ændringer i dem. https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Da:Adresser
Sammyhawkrad (2025-09-19 17:16:29+00:00): Hello albert12@, this changeset and a few others you have made today have crossing buildings. Buildings shouldn't overlap each other. The editor warns you about this mistake, so kindly fix it before you save/upload.
eggie (2025-09-19 16:03:01+00:00): Oke, maar bij de Afslag Boerenzwaluw/Muurzwaluw kan daar autoverkeer niet oversteken?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-19 16:05:06+00:00): Volgens mij kloppen die straatnamen ook niet.
Stukje Boerenzwaluw is volgens mij Muurzwaluw.
Moiety (2025-09-19 16:19:17+00:00): Ik ga het even te voet controleren.
Moiety (2025-09-19 16:20:46+00:00): Oh van de Verlengde Sportlaan naar de Boerenzwaluw kan sowieso niet.
Moiety (2025-09-19 16:21:50+00:00): Oh, je bedoelt van De Wiekslag naar de Boerenzwaluw/Muurzwaluw. Daar kan motorverkeer inderdaad oversteken. Ga er zo vanuit dat dat kleine stukje Boerenzwaluw idd Muurzwaluw is, maar zal het controleren.
eggie (2025-09-19 16:39:40+00:00): Yep.. dat stuk fietspad in het midden zal unclassified zijn
Moiety (2025-09-19 16:54:23+00:00): Gefixed in #172172533
HellMap (2025-09-19 16:51:45+00:00): Čau,

Kartējot `turn:lanes` (vai citus joslu tegus), pašam `lanes` arī jābūt tam pašam daudzumam, t.i. `lanes=3` šeit.

Tā pat https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37850959 būs 2 un varbūt citur, es neesmu visas izmaiņas apskatījies.
user_23259244 (2025-09-19 18:18:38+00:00): Vot šis ir man kas jauns, jo uz JOSM neesmu strādājis ar lanes. Es tur tikai pievienoju joslu skaitu kā dabā, bet tad sanāk vajag pievienot atseviši turn:lanes.
HellMap (2025-09-19 18:24:53+00:00): JOSMā ir plugins turn lanes rediģēšanai. Tur lanes skaitam automātiski būtu jābūt. Precīzāk, tu izvēlies lanes configurāciju logā un plugins saliek visas vērtības. Tu laikam šeit liki vienkārši tegos pa taisno?
user_23259244 (2025-09-19 18:35:17+00:00): Nē, izmantoju plugins turn lanes un validator izmantoju kurš kļudas neatrada.
user_23259244 (2025-09-21 17:45:35+00:00): "Kartējot `turn:lanes` (vai citus joslu tegus), pašam `lanes` arī jābūt tam pašam daudzumam, t.i. `lanes=3` šeit."
Deglavas ielu izlaboju.
Kā nākamā Juglas ielā redzēsi video kur joslu skaits automātiski nemainās.  https://drive.google.com/file/d/12I_F512zfdBKId17KONaHimwhGg94OYv/view?usp=drive_link
HellMap (2025-09-21 17:52:32+00:00): Tas nav turn lanes plugins, tu pa taisno maini tegus. Plugins ir šis: https://github.com/JOSM/turnlanes-tagging . Tur is speciāls logs, kur var bultiņas likt.
user_23259244 (2025-09-21 17:57:21+00:00): Ā pag, tač, ko sajaucu. Tūlīt paskatišos.
user_23259244 (2025-09-21 18:24:15+00:00): Jā tas bija joslu skats, Paldies! Tas ir labs Plugins kas automātiski visu saliek. 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/14R-uwXfjARIUQnZhCzOA2jm6ggKlqj17/view?usp=drive_link
HellMap (2025-09-21 18:50:05+00:00): 👍

Tikai apskaties wiki par turn (lanes) tegu, jo tur bija punkts par to, ka turn lanes gluži neliek tur, kur nav bultu. Jo turn lanes nav gluži "iespējamie joslu virzieni", bet "šī josla apzīmēta tikai X virzienam". Citiem vārdiem, tādiem kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172260142 man liekas nemaz turn lanes nav (jeb faktiski `turn:lanes=none|none`, jo bultu nav un zilās plāksnes ir jau garām), jo ceļa ģeometriju jau pats ceļš parāda. Bet turn ir domāts, lai precizētu kā tieši nākotnes ceļa posms ir ar zīmēm vai bultām norādīts *pirms* tas reāli nogriežas.

Bet es gan reti tos kartēju, tāpēc varu kaut ko jaukt.
felipeeugenio (2025-09-20 14:36:33+00:00): revertido
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172170246
felipeeugenio (2025-09-20 14:36:36+00:00): revertido
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172170350
AndersAndersson (2025-09-20 23:14:42+00:00): Det här är inte din personliga karta. Hjälp gärna till och gör kartan bättre. Men här har du lagt in var just du antagligen bor och samtidigt dragit iväg en nod så att två områden överlappar.
AndersAndersson (2025-09-20 23:15:01+00:00): Jag har tagit bort dina ändringar.
AndersAndersson (2025-09-20 23:16:46+00:00): Varför har du dragit en cykelparkering och satt fast den på en byggnad?
muralito (2025-09-20 15:28:18+00:00): Según la definición el operator:type debe ser "public", no "government". Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:operator:type
zabop (2025-09-19 17:10:48+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments. "1" on its own does not seem to be meaningful. If I'm missing something, please enlighten me.
dadavid (2026-04-01 08:43:21+00:00): Hi, wie ist denn das ford=yes auf dem Mähdlesberg gemeint, da ist doch keine Furt, oder? :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/486226542

Viele Grüße

David
AndersAndersson (2025-09-20 23:10:27+00:00): Det finns en topp med Hemlingbyberget 20 m från noden du lade till och en nod för Hemlingbybacken finns 30 m från noden du lade till.
Jag tar bort din nod.
DariaDX (2025-10-16 15:20:29+00:00): Ta wersja jest jak najbardziej prawidłowa. Proszę nic już nie zmieniać
AndersAndersson (2025-09-20 23:08:24+00:00): Det fanns redan en nod för biblioteket. Jag tog bort den du lade till.
toorboalex (2025-09-30 16:23:37+00:00): Приветствую! Закрытый в августе и начале сентября участок Р-351 снова открыли, а открытый вместо нго участок трассы Восток закрыли?
foreigner037 (2025-10-18 11:28:09+00:00): Привет,

каква е идеята с тагването на яз. Горни Дъбник по този начин? Също така сигурен ли си че е intermittent=yes?
plamen (2025-10-19 06:45:33+00:00): На някои сателитни снимки е бил доста по-малък. Всички язовири имат някакъв вариращ обем, съответно площ, която пресъхва лятото. Но тук трябва и актуализация.
HantDX (2025-09-19 20:16:14+00:00): А почему в местах, которые на 1ом этаже, указан level=1, в то время как по идее должно быть level=0?
Gregory Peony (2025-09-19 18:27:17+00:00): Every footprint you mapped here represents a building, and the majority of them are very accurately mapped. Thank you for your contribution, keep it up!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172172978
michaelthehutt (2025-10-01 19:35:30+00:00): The lodge and campground are for members of the league, so I think access=private is probably appropriate.
ChromeLotus (2025-09-23 16:57:56+00:00): Correction: Source used was Bing Streetside
Yog Sot (2025-09-19 18:45:23+00:00): yo yo, przystanki winny mieć na węźle drogi `highway=bus_stop`, a skasowałeś
Bartek444 (2025-09-19 19:13:55+00:00): highway=bus_stop jest w miejscu oczekiwania pasażerów, a nie na drodze
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop
Yog Sot (2025-09-19 22:28:11+00:00): uh, dobra, ale jak nie wstawisz tego na highway chodnika, to nie da się w takim wypadku do tego nawigować. Ogólnie widzę jak duzo jest złego tagowania w okolicy w takim wypadku.
pavvv (2025-09-20 22:40:47+00:00): Oczywiście, że się da. Zobacz, że wszystkie routery nigdy nie prowadzą wyłącznie do miejsc połączonych ze ścieżką/z drogą. Myślisz, że jak działa nawigacja do punktów adresowych?
Btw nigdzie nie daje się highway=bus_stop na węźle chodnika, więc to też fikcyjne stwierdzenie.
JoaoPaixao (2025-09-20 13:00:41+00:00): Bom dia,
Porque removeste o nome da estrada?
rui228 (2025-09-20 15:07:36+00:00): Olá. Erro corrigido, foi lapso. Reposição do nome. Obrigado pelo reparo. Cumprimentos.
ianlopez1115 (2025-09-19 17:12:43+00:00): offset used was -1.49; -4.78
bxl-forever (2025-09-19 17:42:23+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.  Probably a private sports centre for the school, right?  In that case, we should retag it with access=private to avoid being shown to people looking for a sports centre nearby.
Mandr1ll (2025-09-19 17:57:57+00:00): Hi! Kind of it is sport infrastructure of the commune Woluwé saint Lambert. It could be booked (for example by sport clubs) when they are contacted. https://www.woluwe1200.be/services/stade-fallon/. A volley ball club and basketball club of the commune train there after hours and in weekends.
bxl-forever (2025-09-19 19:11:53+00:00): OK, thanks.  Even is this is a borderline case, perhaps it’s best to leave it as public, then.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 19:40:08+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620639378/history has shop = brewery that was added in this edit
shop=brewery ? Is it shop selling alcohol? Or just place producing it? (man_made=works?) Or maybe both? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=alcohol
YomanNH (2025-09-22 12:25:15+00:00): Cześć,
name to nazwa. "budowana droga dojazdowa" z pewnością nie jest nazwą. A ta droga: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1355768674 nawet nie jest już budowana, według zmian, które wprowadziłeś.
eserte (2025-09-20 06:14:25+00:00): Hallo Ulifan,

es kursieren Bilder, die den neuen Namen auf dem Bahnhof zeigen, z.B. https://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/alter-name-weiterhin-abgebildet-bvg-bringt-neue-tafeln-am-u-bahnhof-anton-wilhelm-amo-strasse-an-14231975.html und https://www.morgenpost.de/bezirke/mitte/article409844570/u-bahnhof-mohrenstrasse-heisst-nun-anton-wilhelm-amo-strasse.html

Der BVG-Netzplan dürfte nicht relevant sein (ist ja auch nur ein Kartenwerk), on the ground wiegt schwerer.

-- Slaven
eserte (2025-09-20 13:33:24+00:00): Ich habe nachgeschaut und ein Revert gemacht. Mapillary-Bilder dazu sind gerade im Upload.
eserte (2025-09-20 15:00:31+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=1163840575609283&x=0.2246&y=0.4934&zoom=1.4826
archie (2025-09-19 17:53:23+00:00): Vänligen läs om path och dess för osm egen betydelse (som inte är lika med naturstig):

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath#Examples
Tobias1982 (2025-09-20 06:21:05+00:00): Ja jag har läst
En allmän stig för antingen en specificerad användning eller för flera användningsområden. Som standard är highway=path öppen för alla icke motoriserade fordon men utryckningsfordon är tillåtna

Jämför med cycleway:
The highway=cycleway tag indicates a separate way for the use of cyclists.

Och jag hittade även en tagg för Gång-och cykelväg senare.  Allt beror på skyltning, saknas det skyltning på platsen kanske path kan användas.
weblogdryads (2026-05-09 03:13:42+00:00): road does not make sense
Nirmala03 (2026-05-12 04:40:52+00:00): Hi weblogdryads,
Thank you for your valuable feedback. Please note that rboda, who made this edit, is no longer working with our organization. However, we have taken note of your feedback and the necessary corrective measures will be taken accordingly. We appreciate your continued suggestions and look forward to your feedback in the future. Thank you
Nirmala03 (2026-05-12 04:46:53+00:00): Also deleted the road based on the feedback.
user_5359 (2025-09-19 19:31:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add a no_u_turn relation missing the members with the role from, via, to. But the mentioned way is a oneway. You can not make a you u_turn.
valaise (2025-11-03 04:30:53+00:00): Hi, in this changeset a number of trees were added to the centerline of East 14th Street. It looks like these may have been placed with an incorrect offset. Could you update them to their intended locations when you have a chance? Thanks!
martien-176 (2025-09-19 19:05:55+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. 

A few buildings are mapped by snapping their corners to other buildings and features such as roads and paths. That should be avoided.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172176162