piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
berndw (2025-08-26 14:59:54+00:00): 

Zum Thema Nutzung von Geodaten habe ich eine Diskussion in Forum gestartet, die das Geoportal in Rheinland-Pfalz keine erlaubte Quelle ist.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/verwendung-von-geodaten-in-rlp/134805
BurkeNiner (2025-09-16 20:44:34+00:00): Should the segments of Memorial Drive be changed and classified as foot=yes just because sidewalks and bikepaths are present? Those paths have their own segments which are classified as foot:yes and what people should be walking on, not the road itself
StreetSurveyor (2025-09-16 21:25:15+00:00): Memorial Drive is a public road that is not legally prohibited to pedestrians. The presence of sidewalks and bike paths doesn’t negate pedestrian access to the road itself—it just provides safer alternatives. Unless there’s explicit signage or regulation forbidding foot traffic, the correct tagging should reflect that pedestrians can use the road.
user_5359 (2025-08-26 09:10:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/6721840157 (restaurant) more than 100 meters to a street crossing. Please check this position.
If you need help: You are welcome.
ralley (2025-08-26 00:25:36+00:00): Do these trees you are adding really have an name?  It appears as if you are adding a generic "Pohon" (which I understand to be a translation of tree) to every tree.  This is not correct or needed, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171001802
Kovoschiz (2025-08-26 08:45:24+00:00): Why delete the `=museum` area? Only need to remove `building=`
naiqi (2025-08-27 00:08:05+00:00): Un detalle que creo importante: La Puerta o Portón marcado (y eliminado) en el extermo norte del Pasaje San Nicolás esquina con calle Apóstol Pablo es falso, No Existe dicha puerta, tal esquina nunca ha tenido ese elemento (al menos hasta ahora) por (y en) el Pasaje San Nicolás. Favor considerar, Sólo eso, no me extenderé por ahora sobre temas que quizá vayan al caso, como seguridad o información falsa.
naiqi (2025-08-27 00:09:08+00:00): Un detalle que creo importante: La Puerta o Portón marcado (y eliminado) en el extremo norte del Pasaje San Nicolás esquina con calle Apóstol Pablo es falso, No Existe dicha puerta, tal esquina nunca ha tenido ese elemento (al menos hasta ahora) por (y en) el Pasaje San Nicolás. Favor considerar, Sólo eso, no me extenderé por ahora sobre temas que quizá vayan al caso, como seguridad o información falsa.
LachlanTansey2009 (2025-08-26 01:12:20+00:00): How was the relation invalid?
nevw (2025-08-30 03:15:40+00:00): Hi, why are you using a multipolygon to map these disparate bits. It would be better to map using simple polygons as other parts in the area are mapped.
user_5359 (2025-08-26 09:07:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your change has been deleted due to incomprehensible information and incomplete description.
user_5359 (2025-08-26 09:04:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database.
Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes.
Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/171016639
user_5359 (2025-08-26 09:02:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database.
Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes.
Reverted by https://www.osm.org/changeset/171016401
XD346 (2025-10-16 11:57:29+00:00): 请不要将别墅区内的道路调整为highway=service，这里的道路用于集散住宅区内外交通车流，而非用于连接某一建筑或设施，根据wiki定义，应当使用highway=residential
PcMouse1 (2025-08-26 02:34:12+00:00): correction, highway 27
buy_osmand (2025-08-26 03:17:06+00:00): You are not to be held responsible but i am allowed to make this factual statement. I have reviewed and observed that these two stretch of roads are split into many pieces. If any mapper is up for it, and there isn't an issue with merging them then please proceed.

April 10th, Mankind is free 🚶‍♀️🚶‍♂️ << this is a message sign off of truth
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171003925
Living_man (2025-08-28 09:59:54+00:00): ://osmcha.org/changesets/171050249

Greetings Kamilla Vainshtok, from the above edits implemented, my interpretation would be it's one or the other. . . your comment will impact future corrections (if needed) for you have cited `local_knowledge` in this changeset 😊

In summary: is the linked edit to your satisfaction? or rather, does `austinteaxchange` cafe takes the whole of that seperated building (w384940417) or the corner ((n13097410836), v1)?
Kovoschiz (2025-08-26 04:50:51+00:00): On the other hand, there's actually the problem of whether `landuse=cemetery` should be used when they are not cemeteries, no one being buried here at all. Have used `*amenity=columbarium` to follow `=crematorium`
vectorial8192 (2025-08-26 05:02:22+00:00): I have a feeling the chief OSM schema guys mostly live in places where burial is done in the traditional sense of "graveyard" and have no concept of "a building for holding ashes".

I currently view `landuse=cemetery` to be "a land that is used to hold/bury dead bodies". This would work alongside e.g `landuse=residential` to be "a land that contains houses/homes for people to live in" without needing to specify the exact format of homes/houses.
Patrickov (2025-08-26 06:21:16+00:00): Vector, They have buildings for holding ashes.  Check out https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golders_Green_Crematorium, which does NOT have landuse tag on OSM.  I suggest you revert this change.
vectorial8192 (2025-08-26 13:52:22+00:00): It turns out we don't even seem to have `landuse=amenity` in OSM.

The original changeset was to update on the `landuse=construction` tag. I guess we do need to remove the `landuse` area altogether.
vectorial8192 (2025-08-26 13:53:10+00:00): Improved with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171031532
Patrickov (2025-08-26 14:56:16+00:00): IMHO landuse=amenity is meaningless, at least under OSM terminology.  Almost anything on OSM can be considered an amenity one way or another.

I think you should have asked on a general OSM group before making this edit.  Or had you already asked but hadn't received any response?
vectorial8192 (2025-08-26 16:32:11+00:00): My goal on OSM is to provide/handle updates quick enough with reasonable correctness. Sometimes I choose not to ask when I expect the change to be simple / small, e.g. this case.

I do admit I was thinking quickly here and then selected the crematorium preset on the iD editor.
Kovoschiz (2025-08-27 06:53:48+00:00): There's `=institutional`
Patrickov (2025-08-27 07:08:54+00:00): But is Shansum an organization qualifying for "landuse=institutional"?  I thought it's a commercial organization
vectorial8192 (2025-08-27 09:31:33+00:00): afaik OSM really strongly discourages using `=institutional` because it does not distinguish between e.g. "government", "medical", "education", "ngo" and a whole lot of other categories.
Kovoschiz (2025-08-28 17:27:54+00:00): 1. You can certainly have privatized provision of such services though, which is handled by `ownership=private` to be accurate. It doesn't seem very `=commercial` 
2. I exactly see it as an umbrella category to handle all these before each is decided. Tracestrack render `=institutional` along the other alternatives,
Kovoschiz (2025-08-28 17:39:24+00:00): 1. `=commercial` means "commercial" services in the sense of offices. It doesn't mean "commercial" organizations, eg `=industrial` are obviously mostly "commercial".
user_5359 (2025-08-28 17:02:55+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1424919109, https://www.osm.org/way/1424919108.
What is the mean of the tags
adm1_psgc = 200000000
adm2_psgc = 203100000
adm3_psgc = 203108000
adm4_en = De Vera
adm4_psgc = 203108028
area_crs = 7977901
area_km2 = 7
geo_level = Bgy
len_crs = 13188
len_km = 13
?
Why do both have the same name ‘a’?
seav (2025-08-28 18:52:40+00:00): Aside from these weird tags which have been imported without change from the source dataset, OSM doesn't actually have permission to use this dataset (originally from the Philippine Statistics Authority, then cleaned up via the Technical Working Group of the Office of Civil Defense, then distributed via UN OCHA) so these boundary additions may need to be reverted.
CodentGIS (2025-08-29 15:46:13+00:00): @user_5359 Sorry for that! i accidentally forgot to delete the tags in JOSM. I may have further deleted it in the process of completing it, but thank you for noticing.
CodentGIS (2025-08-29 15:57:15+00:00): @seav I thought that the shapefile data from Faeldon was okay to use, and did not have any references to the ones you identified. But if you were talking about the tags, I have deleted those and changed it as administrative boundary tags. But if the boundaries would cause a legal issue, then I’m open to reverting it. Thank you for noticing!
Glassman (2025-08-27 00:11:11+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171005056
buy_osmand (2025-08-27 05:44:23+00:00): 🎉I'm not . . .this good !! for my first edit 😄

😳👍 Good, #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171005056
Glassman (2025-08-27 00:11:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171005221
user_5359 (2025-08-26 08:57:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the mean of the tag payment:USDC=yes?
Udarian (2025-08-26 11:03:52+00:00): also unless there has been some recent construction in the area this is not within a building and most of the building surrounding seem to be apartments and other residential buildings so I am wondering if this is actually were this business is located.

happy mapping,
Udar
Connected Shop (2025-08-27 21:36:32+00:00): Hi, Udarian. It is and you can check our company on sunbiz.org here. You can look us up there by typing in our entity name. It’s the official  company Registar of Florida and has our federal IRS EIN # also.
eggie (2025-08-26 06:17:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback   .. Let wel op dat je het adres zelf niet verwijderd.. doe dat alleen met de bedrijfsinfo. 
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
cedric538 (2025-08-30 08:27:31+00:00): Dank voor de snelle review.
Ik ben het er mee eens dat het logischer is om het adres niet te verwijderen, het pand staat er immers nog.
i2004 (2025-08-26 15:30:26+00:00): gracias a ti por corregirme yo trate de hacerlo tambien
rempshaener (2025-08-26 12:13:53+00:00): Hallo,

du hast um eine Prüfung deiner Bearbeitungen gebeten.
Vorweg ein Lob: die Mapillary-Idee finde ich gut.
Ich habe nur eine kleine Anmerkung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13097646218: Dort, wo auf jeden Fall noch mal jemand in Zukunft (aktiv) drüberschauen soll, würde ich eher „fixme“ statt „note“ verwenden.

Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Viele Grüße
thunderylight (2025-08-26 18:50:31+00:00): Hallo repshaener,
danke für dein Review. Gerade bei einer der ersten Datensätze die ich neu anlege, ist mir das Feedback sehr hilfreich. Ich war zwischen FIXME und note ab abwägen und hatte mich für note entschieden, da es ja nicht wirklich ein Fehler ist. 
Das Lob bezüglich Mapillary muss ich weitergeben. flohoff hatte mich nachdem ich eine Anmerkung mit Foto zu Hydranten gemacht habe, mir mitgeteilt, das die Erfassung von Hydranten aktuell ein Thema sei und dass die Foto besser auf Mapillary aufgehoben seien. 
Ich ändere den Datensatz auf fixme.
Bei weiteren Fragen komme ich gerne auf dich zu.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2025-08-26 20:04:05+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe letztens schon gesehen, dass flohoff Fotos hinterlegt. Schöne Sache.
Das fixme ist eher "schaut doch bitte noch mal", note geht in die Richtung "wenn ihr eh dran seid, beachtet bitte..."
Ich z. B. suche aktiv nach fixme, nicht nach note.
Viele Grüße
jacobwhall (2025-08-26 04:45:30+00:00): See here for more discussion / examples

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/where-does-the-pitch-start-and-the-recreation-ground-end/134600/6
pinkl0rina (2025-09-10 08:45:56+00:00): Warum wurde Weg 1354436687 aus dieser Relation für U1 U2 U3 U8 gelöscht ? Damit beginnt die Strecke in der Mitte des eingezeichneten Bahnsteiges und das Gleis am Bahnsteig fehlt teilweise (die Stop position kann unabhängig von der Gleislänge gesetzt werden).  Außerdem ergibt sich dadurch eine Lücke zwischen Bahnsteig und Wendeanlage.
Senihtu (2025-09-10 12:04:09+00:00): Laut PTv2 (genauer https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/HE/DE-HE-RMV-Analysis.html) sollte eine Rouet mit der ersten stop_position beginnen und mit der letzten stop_position enden. Die Fahrgäste fahren ja nicht mit in die Wendeanlage.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2025-08-26 10:48:40+00:00): 17578889 relation này hiện đang bị lỗi do mất member "via". Phiền bạn kiểm tra lại. Rất cám ơn.
eggie (2025-08-26 06:18:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Dillen GJ (2025-08-26 22:16:47+00:00): Bazaar plattegrond: https://plattegrond.debazaar.nl/
monotar (2025-08-26 13:02:00+00:00): bist du sicher, dass ausschließlich ein DE:240 steht? Letztes Mal stand auch landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei unter dem Verkehrszeichen, und in diesem Fall war das Tagging des Weges auch vollkommen richtig.

Der Pedestrian-Weg aus dem anderen Changeset passt so auch nicht.
bigopenmac (2025-08-27 09:15:29+00:00): Привет! Спасибо что учавствуешь в валидации магазинов.
Ты случайно дал одинаковый ref:BY:trade_register двум точкам. Есть возможность исправить? Если нет, то не проблема, сдлеаю позже. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9076597368

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8913428951
Iaanneed_a (2025-08-27 11:53:26+00:00): Исправил, спасибо за внимательность! 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171076354
rempshaener (2025-09-01 19:21:27+00:00): Hallo,
ich möchte auf osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines bzw. osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct hinweisen.
Der Import ist noch überschaubar, deswegen würde ich gerne von einer Löschung absehen.
Magst du erläutern, woher die Daten stammen und ob/wie deren Übereinstimmung mit den Daten vor Ort geprüft wurde?
Viele Grüße
FirePape (2025-09-01 19:25:03+00:00): Sry bin da kein Profi. Daten stammen vom örtlichen Wasserversorgung und benötige diese
Dringend für uns als feuerwehr vor ort. Hydranten sind auch  soweit geprüft
rempshaener (2025-09-01 20:09:52+00:00): Hallo,

ich verstehe deine Beweggründe, dennoch gibt es ein paar Mindeststandards.
Was aus meiner Sicht wichtig ist:
- Dem Wasserversorger sollte klar sein, dass „seine“ Daten jetzt in OSM sind. Das sehe ich persönlich als völlig unkritisch, es kommt dennoch immer wieder zu Fällen, in denen Wasserwerke plötzlich die Löschung verlangen. Was nach kürzester Zeit nicht mehr möglich ist.
- Daten der Wasserversorger enthalten teilweise Spül-, Belüftungs- oder Gartenhydranten, die keine Hydranten für die Feuerwehr sind.
- Es kommt vor, dass Hydranten projektiert, aber nie installiert wurden.
Das wäre entsprechend zu kontrollieren.

Was an den Daten auffällt:
- Das Feld ref darf nur gefüllt sein, wenn die Daten vor Ort auf dem Hydrantenschild ausgewiesen sind.
- Es ist sehr auffällig, dass selbst der fire_hydrant:type und die Nennweite fehlen.

Meine Empfehlung für alle oben genannten Punkte:
StreetComplete installieren, die Hydranten ablaufen und die fehlenden Daten ergänzen, SC fragt nach diesen Daten. Eine Arbeit von ein paar Stunden – fertig.

Viele Grüße
FirePape (2025-09-01 20:16:24+00:00): Für uns sind die Rohrdurchmesser erstmal
Uninteressant, sondern wichtig, dass unsere Navi in den Einsatzfahrzeuge schnell ein Hydranten anzeigt. Können das bei der nächsten Hydrantenkontrolle ergänzen. Der Versorger hat uns extra die Daten geben damit wir die sicherheit herstellen können.
rempshaener (2025-09-01 20:26:26+00:00): Ich würde es nur nicht zu lange herauszögern.
NorthCrab_upload (2025-08-26 06:31:06+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274292450

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Sylabowy Kot (2025-08-26 09:26:53+00:00): Twoje zmiany kwalifikują się do wycofania - dobrze, że podajesz źródła danych, ale używanie do tego celu Google w tym Google Maps jest niedozwolone w OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Cz%C4%99sto_zadawane_pytania#Dlaczego_nie_u%C5%BCywacie_Google_Maps_lub_czego%C5%9B_w_tym_rodzaju_do_robienia_waszych_map?

Tutaj powinieneś użyć co najwyżej listy ze strony internetowej. Nie wiem, na co ci były GMaps.
eggie (2025-08-26 06:46:49+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..  
Hoegee Suzuki Center was al aanwezig op de kaart. Ik heb nu wat info samengevoegd.

MVG
eggie
Caspar87 (2025-08-26 08:34:07+00:00): Hoi Eggie, Dank! op een of andere manier was het niet zichtbaar voor mij. 

mvg, 

Caspar
eggie (2025-08-26 20:51:34+00:00): Dag Ro   Ik heb het stuk even gesplitst en tot het paaltje als residential getagd.
Zal eens kijken als ik er langs rijd, want in juni j.l. was de hele straat opgebroken. 
De verbinding met de Spuiweg heb ik ook op emergency=yes gezet.
Dat is dan nog pedestrian
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-09-01 14:09:46+00:00): @Ro
Het stukje Geldelozepad tussen Azijn plaats en Hellingen is onder 'construction'.
Vanaf de Spuiweg liggen rijplaten en paaltjes staan er momenteel ook niet.
Hoe alles terugkomt geen idee. 
Er wordt hier al een hele tijd aan de straat gewerkt.
Vanaf de Hellingen kun je er momenteel niet komen. 
MVG
eggie
silversurfer83 (2025-08-26 17:14:16+00:00): Hi :)

nice to see someone working on my old prowling ground in Höchst.

Still there's the question what this is supposed to be:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13097765705

(and next time try to keep it local ;)

cheers
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171010287
MajorTomMueller (2025-08-26 18:38:54+00:00): This is not supposed to be there. I have overlooked that node  
It needs to be removed.
SomeoneElse (2025-08-26 16:05:10+00:00): Hello,
What does the changeset comment "approved AI buildings" mean?
Best Regards,
Andy
ns130291 (2025-08-26 20:32:49+00:00): Hi Andy,
this means I used the Rapid Editor https://rapideditor.org/ to view and approve building outlines from Microsoft Bing Building Footprint Dataset https://github.com/microsoft/GlobalMLBuildingFootprints
(and adjusted them where needed, e.g. rotation or additional points)
SomeoneElse (2025-08-26 21:41:59+00:00): Ah - thanks!
PengualaHeadphones (2025-08-29 07:04:20+00:00): These two lines of Bustos Flyover are too very close to each other, and it nearly shows as a one line.
LimpopoRiver (2025-09-02 22:10:02+00:00): Hi PengualaHeadphones,
Thank you for taking a look at this edit, I see you aligned the trunk ways and will defer to your edits.
Xeff (2025-09-15 14:45:28+00:00): Why did you changed the path and and the same time created a non connected ending of the path? The new path is going through a dangerous rockfall zone which should not be a path. Do you have a reason for that new path exept for strava data?
techtimo (2025-09-15 19:16:50+00:00): Hi Xeff, from my past experience it is always difficult to map paths on glaciers. IN this case the path wasn't connected previously and usually the strava heatmap data is a good fit as it only shows aggregated data from within the last year. If you know that there is a danger zone maybe it's better to remove the path entirely?
Xeff (2025-09-16 20:10:22+00:00): I checked the prior path again and it was connected! I will restore the prior path. Removing might be an option but it is likely it will get reinsterted following strava, so not really productive.
maraf24 (2025-08-27 08:08:32+00:00): Podaj proszę źródło mówiące o tym, że budowa na tym odcinku się rozpoczęła.
AndyB_66 (2025-08-27 08:15:12+00:00): https://tuwroclaw.com/artykul/jest-decyzja-mozna-n1769440 - ale skoro uważasz, że ZnRID to za mało...
AndyB_66 (2025-08-27 08:32:59+00:00): A tak po prawdzie - to status tego odcinka z "proposed" na "construction" zmienił user "polski ziemniak" w zestawie #170937870 - nie ja. Co więcej, na kolejnym odcinku, który w ogóle nie ma ZnRID-u poprawiłem "construction" z powrotem na "proposed", wycofując błędną zmianę #170955639 usera "Honza Mareš123657".
maraf24 (2025-08-27 09:15:40+00:00): Tak, zrid to za mało, bo powinno się liczyć to, co można zobaczyć w terenie. Jeśli się pomyliłem co do autora to przepraszam, widzę, że tu wiele osób edytuje i wycofuje, wszystko się nakłada na siebie.
user_5359 (2025-08-26 08:06:07+00:00): 
Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/13069877306 more than 100 meters. Is this position correct?
If you need help: You are welcome!
DodoGTA (2025-08-27 08:01:34+00:00): Why does this stretch past the Lithuania border (despite the train line name implying it being fully in Lithuania)?
gabripey (2025-08-27 09:51:39+00:00): This is something outside my touch-up. The line sections are already part of a route that was already there. I only named the already existing route.
DodoGTA (2025-08-27 09:56:02+00:00): @gabripey I see there's a route relation for that (but it's actually Klaipėda - Tilžė/Sovetsk instead of Klaipėda - Pagėgiai)
Yog Sot (2025-08-26 22:31:50+00:00): okej, droga jest prywatna, ale wstęp jest wolny, więc chyba tag inny sie nalezy wstępu? ;)
aTarom (2025-08-26 09:57:30+00:00): Hola bienvenido a OSM,
se ha movido accidentalmente este nodo?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/349238581/history
Ahora no coincide el valor de elevación y creo que estaba bien ubicado antes, si me puedes resolver la duda, gracias.
Eye1024 (2025-08-27 13:12:25+00:00): Kazimierz Sprawiedliwy?? Na jakiej podstawie ta zmiana? Źródło? Link? Na cokole nie ma napisu, ale w necie (w wielu miejscach) jest opisany jako pomnik Kazimierza Wielkiego. Nawet ulica przy której stoi jest Aleją Kazimierza Wielkiego.
Berlin555 (2025-08-26 08:02:05+00:00): source: https://www.nhmus.hu/contact-us/
eggie (2025-08-26 08:31:38+00:00): Dag Robert Je hebt met deze actie een wandelroute onderbroken door een weg te verwijderen met die wandelroute en 'm opnieuw in te tekenen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-26 08:34:28+00:00): Wandelroute WaddenWandelen - Texel - 03 hersteld.
RobertTXL (2025-08-26 08:45:01+00:00): Goedemorgen, 

Oké dat was niet mijn bedoeling. Mijn bedoeling was wel het autoverkeer laten afnemen omdat die nu ingetekend stond als rijweg waar het eigenlijk voetpad is. 

Gr Robert
eggie (2025-08-26 08:54:56+00:00): Dag Robert,

De vraag is dan wel welke bebording hier staat. Je mag niet de routering beïnvloeden door een wegtype te gaan aanpassen. 
Er zou bv een bord voetgangersgebied kunnen staan. highway=pedestrian met motor_vehicle=destination. Ik noem maar wat.  De kades lijken me geen wandelpad.

Graag reactie
MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-08-26 08:58:20+00:00): Hier zie je overigens de wandelroute
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=18.0/53.0401/4.8504
RobertTXL (2025-08-26 09:03:37+00:00): Hoi Eggie, 

Er staat een bord voor voetgangersgebied. Er rijden vaak auto's toch in omdat dit op google maps zo aangegeven wordt bij ze. Daar komen ze een grote zwerfkei tegen als wegversperring waardoor de auto's achteruit moeten rijden door de drukte.