piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Popiejopie12 (2024-02-17 13:54:36+00:00): het is een kantoor, het gebouw heeft geen naam, maar het kan vgm ook gw als gebouw worden gemarkeerd
eggie (2024-02-17 14:03:11+00:00): Oke.... maar in dat geval kun je beter name=Kantoor verwijderen.
We taggen ook niet name=Bankje of name=Huis.
Pas je het zelf weer aan?
Mapse
eggie
bxl-forever (2024-02-17 16:37:16+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this but just some advice here.  There is a problem with the StreetComplete app: the quest about possible missing addresses does not work very well in cities like Brussels, where almost all the addresses are already on the map.  The app will suggest to fill missing housenumbers on buildings that should in fact not be filled.

In the settings, you can turn off some quests.  If you map in Brussels, can I suggest you turn off this quest (or you can ignore the questions, but please do not fill housenumbers that already exist in the database, it just corrupts the database).

Thanks in advance and happy mapping.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-17 13:50:17+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, upewnij się, że jest ona poprawna. Jeśli nie, usuń addr:street, a nazwę miejscowości przekaż w addr:place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1251601440
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1251601441

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
Michał Tur (2024-02-17 14:05:58+00:00): Dziękuję za uwagę. Poprawione
NorthCrab (2024-02-17 17:05:11+00:00): Dzięki :-)
NorthCrab (2024-02-17 16:50:13+00:00): This changeset broke some boundaries around here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1251603212 https://img.monicz.dev/-dcdkWxB6B2
Ruben Morgado (2024-02-17 23:04:50+00:00): Thanks for the note. I believe its fixed. Please, check.
rivermont (2024-02-19 17:57:36+00:00): What is the actual source for these changes? I don't think you surveyed 30k points.

I'm also curious why the waterways that define many of these administrative boundaries aren't being used as the boundaries.
Ruben Morgado (2024-02-21 09:18:05+00:00): Rivermont, bad use of wording, the boundaries I got them from the geography department at the Ministery of Land. About the waterways, it's just my process, first add all the relationships and then go case by case to check and replace boundaries with waterways.
Supaplex (2024-02-18 03:58:32+00:00): 請善用 highway=proposed
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dproposed
注意 OpenStreetMap 是繪製「當下」存在的事物，交流道應該還不在吧？
eggie (2024-02-17 14:10:04+00:00): Dag Nick   Het zou zomaar kunnen maar in de tagging staat er een NL:G12a bord. Welk bord staat hier vooraan. Nu is de tagging onlogisch.
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 

MVG
eggie
NickHermuhlen (2024-02-17 14:12:44+00:00): Hi eggie begin fietssnelweg en eind fietssnelweg staat een NL:G11
NickHermuhlen (2024-02-17 14:13:35+00:00): Zie inderdaad nu net dat ik vergeten ben het bord aan te passen
eggie (2024-02-17 14:24:16+00:00): Ik heb net e.e.a. aangepast, maar wellicht moeten er nog wat paden worden aangepast, want die komen nu op dat G11 snelfietspad uit.
Stukje bij de A1 komende vanuit de Expolaan? 
Kan trouwens herinneren dat er volop gebromd werd, maar dat ik met m'n speedpedelec er toch mocht rijden

Kijk je daar nog even naar?

Groet
eggie
NickHermuhlen (2024-02-17 14:26:12+00:00): Hi eggie, 

Ja zal er verder ook effen naar kijken er mag indd gereden worden met de speedpedelec maar helaas niet met de bromfiets zelf helaas een bekeuring gepakt daar
eggie (2024-02-17 14:31:19+00:00): Klopt...  en voorbij het station moet je dan met de speedpedelec steeds weer het fietspad af omdat dat uitzonderingsbord weer ontbreekt. :)

Maar het uitzoek werk laat ik aan jou. Ik heb de tagging naar G11 aangepast tot de Lemerijweg. Daarna klopt het denk ik weer.
De zijfietspaden denk ik nog niet?
Groet
eggie
NickHermuhlen (2024-02-17 14:36:11+00:00): Hi eggie, 

Yes ik ga dit wiekend effen verder kijken als ik nog wat dingen kan vinden met die fietspaden. 

Ik weet zo net meer zeker als er nou een mooie site / pagina was waar ik alle borden kan vinden? kwa G11 etc is wat makkelijker voor mij dan
eggie (2024-02-17 14:45:03+00:00): https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.274141596&lng=6.773350239&z=18

Dit is het verkeersborden bestand, maar niet 100% correct, want hier is nog wel eens wat veranderd.
Wanneer je op een bord klikt kun je zien waneer de gemeente het voor het laatst heeft geïnventariseerd.
eggie (2024-02-17 14:47:20+00:00): De Grobbenweg zal ook wel veranderd zijn, want je kunt niet meer afslaan na het tunneltje want daar is alles opgebroken. Dus wellicht nu ook G11?
eggie (2024-02-17 14:48:23+00:00): Mocht het G11 zijn geworden dan wel toevoegen speed_pedelec=yes
eggie (2024-02-17 14:32:54+00:00): Top!
pitfire (2024-03-16 07:05:35+00:00): phone=Nummer bitte im internationalen (ITU-T E.164)-Format angegeben.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone
pitfire (2024-03-16 12:07:48+00:00): Ist erledigt. Änderungssatz: 148728542
Kovoschiz (2024-02-18 11:22:09+00:00): This is actually wrong. The boards show "PAI TAU STREET TO SHING MUN COUNTRY PARK COUNTRY TRAIL". You don't even know the correct name. Then is it really a "common name"?
Kovoschiz (2024-02-18 11:23:02+00:00): I already gave you the benefit of doubt of what seems to be a descriptor title to make it the `official_name=`
mp747474 (2024-02-17 19:30:15+00:00): Hallo, das Geschäft war schon an dieser Stelle eingetragen. Ich habe den Doppeleintrag deshalb wieder gelöscht.
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-17 14:40:21+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11630515109
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254519065

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
mp747474 (2024-02-17 19:30:20+00:00): Hallo, das Geschäft war schon an dieser Stelle eingetragen. Ich habe den Doppeleintrag deshalb wieder gelöscht.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-02-27 00:34:30+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147574414
DankJae (2024-02-17 14:41:03+00:00): I mean YO!
andy_wand (2024-02-18 12:08:43+00:00): Hallo, bitte Baustellen mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction taggen, nicht die tags verändern. wenn diese <6 monate dauern, wenn es kürzer dauert, entsprechend mit access=no@(zeitraum) taggen, siede dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access#Zeitabh%C3%A4ngige_und_bedingte_Beschr%C3%A4nkungen weil einige Router und Nutzerapps das Kartenmaterial nicht so oft updaten
silversurfer83 (2024-02-18 12:45:54+00:00): (Ich glaube du meinst ">6 Monate")
mueschel (2024-02-18 12:51:57+00:00): Die Baustelle wurde hier eingetragen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147264298
andy_wand (2024-02-18 13:35:30+00:00): @silversurfer93 ja
Hb- (2024-02-18 14:01:50+00:00): @andy_wand Hier handelt es sich um eine versprochene "Turbo-Baustelle", deren Ende fast zum Greifen nahe ist. https://www.haz.de/lokales/umland/wennigsen/b217-baustelle-in-wennigsen-holtensen-bauarbeiten-verzoegern-sich-weiter-UNMHWTFSHJEDFIWYIQNYH2ZHDI.html
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-17 15:00:37+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Duplikat adresu w okolicy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3544827546
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453518940

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-19 09:12:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147640554, 147640510, 147640527, 147640501, 147640494, 147640506, 147640498, 147640562, 147640547, 147640556, 147640515, 147640567, 147640499, 147640558, 147640495, 147640496, 147640503, 147640479, 147640518, 147640559, 147640552, 147640531, 147640483, 147640546, 147640517, 147640536, 147640565, 147640520, 147640566, 147640512, 147640561, 147640492, 147640549, 147640523, 147640538, 147640524, 147640533, 147640481, 147640544, 147640534, 147640528, 147640543, 147640529, 147640525, 147640502, 147640540, 147640521, 147640507, 147640560, 147640488 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import that created lots of overlapping builidngs
Mapminik (2024-04-02 07:59:24+00:00): Dzień dobry :)
Mam jedną uwagę dotyczącą tych zmian: jeżeli ruch pieszych i rowerów nie jest fizycznie oddzielony np. trawnikiem, a tylko segregowany jak tutaj, należy je rysować jedną linią. Zalecane tagowanie można zobaczyć na stronie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery w sekcji „Drogi dla pieszych i rowerów”.
:-} (2024-04-02 14:54:13+00:00): Witam :(
Uważam, że moja edycja jest poprawna, gdyż ciągi pieszo-rowerowe to jedna droga pełniąca funkcje drogi rowerowej i jednoczeście pieszej, a dwie drogi złączone w jedną, które nie pełnią tych samych funkcji NIE da się nazwać ciągiem pieszo-rowerowym. Nie wiem zresztą po co utworzyłeś zbędne uwagi?
Supaplex (2024-02-19 03:51:35+00:00): 嗨，

你在重劃區內加了新的建築物，但從空照圖當中還不存在。如果是計畫中還沒蓋，則請善用 life cycle 前綴
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Intrinsical (2024-04-26 08:50:59+00:00): It is best practice to list a source=*, when uploading a changeset, so that others can know where this new information came from.

Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source


Please make sure the changeset comment corresponds to the changes made.

Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-19 09:12:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147640554, 147640510, 147640527, 147640501, 147640494, 147640506, 147640498, 147640562, 147640547, 147640556, 147640515, 147640567, 147640499, 147640558, 147640495, 147640496, 147640503, 147640479, 147640518, 147640559, 147640552, 147640531, 147640483, 147640546, 147640517, 147640536, 147640565, 147640520, 147640566, 147640512, 147640561, 147640492, 147640549, 147640523, 147640538, 147640524, 147640533, 147640481, 147640544, 147640534, 147640528, 147640543, 147640529, 147640525, 147640502, 147640540, 147640521, 147640507, 147640560, 147640488 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import that created lots of overlapping builidngs
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-19 09:12:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147640554, 147640510, 147640527, 147640501, 147640494, 147640506, 147640498, 147640562, 147640547, 147640556, 147640515, 147640567, 147640499, 147640558, 147640495, 147640496, 147640503, 147640479, 147640518, 147640559, 147640552, 147640531, 147640483, 147640546, 147640517, 147640536, 147640565, 147640520, 147640566, 147640512, 147640561, 147640492, 147640549, 147640523, 147640538, 147640524, 147640533, 147640481, 147640544, 147640534, 147640528, 147640543, 147640529, 147640525, 147640502, 147640540, 147640521, 147640507, 147640560, 147640488 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import that created lots of overlapping builidngs
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-19 09:12:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147640554, 147640510, 147640527, 147640501, 147640494, 147640506, 147640498, 147640562, 147640547, 147640556, 147640515, 147640567, 147640499, 147640558, 147640495, 147640496, 147640503, 147640479, 147640518, 147640559, 147640552, 147640531, 147640483, 147640546, 147640517, 147640536, 147640565, 147640520, 147640566, 147640512, 147640561, 147640492, 147640549, 147640523, 147640538, 147640524, 147640533, 147640481, 147640544, 147640534, 147640528, 147640543, 147640529, 147640525, 147640502, 147640540, 147640521, 147640507, 147640560, 147640488 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import that created lots of overlapping builidngs
Nakaner (2024-02-27 16:25:47+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe diesen Änderungssatz gerade eben rückgängig gemacht, da er nur bereits existierende POIs duplizitert hat. Beide POIs hattest du selbst Anfang diesen Monats mit iD eingetragen. Sind deine Offline-Kartendaten in MAPS.ME veraltet?

Tipp: Zum mobilen Bearbeiten gibt es die iOS-App GoMap.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Karlograf (2024-02-28 14:33:00+00:00): Hej Michael,
ich hatte die Punkte bei maps.me eingetragen und später festgestellt, dass ich sie durch die dortige räumliche Darstellung nicht innerhalb der Gebäudegrenzen, sondern auf die Straße gesetzt hatte. Das habe ich dann hier im osm Editor geändert. Warum daraus zwei neue Punkte wurden, ist mir nicht klar. Ich hoffe Du hast die korrekten Punkte belassen (innerhalb der Gebäude).
Danke für den Tipp; schaue ich mir mal an. Maps.me ist im Sinne der Punktspezifizierungen auch nicht so dolle.
Viele Grüße.
Viele Grüße.
Aim311_ (2024-04-05 19:04:00+00:00): Cześć. Odcinek drogi edytowany przez ciebie 2 m-ce temu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260427392 jest faktycznie jednokierunkowy?
Wojtek GGG (2024-04-05 19:54:00+00:00): Bardzo dziękuję. Rzeczywiście omyłkowo oznaczyłem cały odcinek zamiast samego dojazdu do skrzyżowania. Oczywiście natychmiast poprawiam :)
silversurfer83 (2024-03-29 17:51:36+00:00): Hello there,

if you take a look at The Map at this location you will find, that some other user added a shed some time after you deleted it.

You see, we map what's there (with some small but important exceptions). We do not delete objects just because "the public" isn't supposed to use it. What you should do in such a case is set the proper access tag, like "access=private". 

Please do not delete the new shed.

You will find more detailed explanations in the wiki and the community is always there in case of questions. Please reach out, if there are any.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels

happy mapping
silversurfer83
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-19 09:12:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147640554, 147640510, 147640527, 147640501, 147640494, 147640506, 147640498, 147640562, 147640547, 147640556, 147640515, 147640567, 147640499, 147640558, 147640495, 147640496, 147640503, 147640479, 147640518, 147640559, 147640552, 147640531, 147640483, 147640546, 147640517, 147640536, 147640565, 147640520, 147640566, 147640512, 147640561, 147640492, 147640549, 147640523, 147640538, 147640524, 147640533, 147640481, 147640544, 147640534, 147640528, 147640543, 147640529, 147640525, 147640502, 147640540, 147640521, 147640507, 147640560, 147640488 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import that created lots of overlapping builidngs
literan (2024-02-23 11:21:54+00:00): здание отрисовано поверх дорожки - правка тяп-ляп, откат.
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-19 09:12:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147640554, 147640510, 147640527, 147640501, 147640494, 147640506, 147640498, 147640562, 147640547, 147640556, 147640515, 147640567, 147640499, 147640558, 147640495, 147640496, 147640503, 147640479, 147640518, 147640559, 147640552, 147640531, 147640483, 147640546, 147640517, 147640536, 147640565, 147640520, 147640566, 147640512, 147640561, 147640492, 147640549, 147640523, 147640538, 147640524, 147640533, 147640481, 147640544, 147640534, 147640528, 147640543, 147640529, 147640525, 147640502, 147640540, 147640521, 147640507, 147640560, 147640488 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import that created lots of overlapping builidngs
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-19 09:12:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147640554, 147640510, 147640527, 147640501, 147640494, 147640506, 147640498, 147640562, 147640547, 147640556, 147640515, 147640567, 147640499, 147640558, 147640495, 147640496, 147640503, 147640479, 147640518, 147640559, 147640552, 147640531, 147640483, 147640546, 147640517, 147640536, 147640565, 147640520, 147640566, 147640512, 147640561, 147640492, 147640549, 147640523, 147640538, 147640524, 147640533, 147640481, 147640544, 147640534, 147640528, 147640543, 147640529, 147640525, 147640502, 147640540, 147640521, 147640507, 147640560, 147640488 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import that created lots of overlapping builidngs
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-19 09:12:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147640554, 147640510, 147640527, 147640501, 147640494, 147640506, 147640498, 147640562, 147640547, 147640556, 147640515, 147640567, 147640499, 147640558, 147640495, 147640496, 147640503, 147640479, 147640518, 147640559, 147640552, 147640531, 147640483, 147640546, 147640517, 147640536, 147640565, 147640520, 147640566, 147640512, 147640561, 147640492, 147640549, 147640523, 147640538, 147640524, 147640533, 147640481, 147640544, 147640534, 147640528, 147640543, 147640529, 147640525, 147640502, 147640540, 147640521, 147640507, 147640560, 147640488 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import that created lots of overlapping builidngs
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-17 16:30:31+00:00): Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera adresy wymagające dodatkowej uwagi. Przygotowałem listę obiektów oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Nazwa ulicy nie istnieje w okolicy.

"Władysława Łokietka":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11634990567

"Heweliusza":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/828222338
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/828222692

"Generała Kleeberga":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/828283812
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/828283940

"Generała Kutrzeby":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/828285919

Pozdrawiam! 🦀
csomerville (2024-02-26 14:10:12+00:00): This changeset appears to update the name of the administrative boundary for the city of Jarrell from "Jarrell" to "Jarrell City Limits". Typically the name key is the official or primary name of a feature. For administrative boundaries such as this, the city name is almost always the correct value. Could you kindly revert it back or share your thinking on why "Jarrell City Limits" is the more appropriate value in this case? Thanks!
pitfire (2024-02-18 06:13:56+00:00): Hi computerfarmer,
jetzt ist Finkenweg 29 doppelt. 

https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/search.html?q=Bonn+Finkenweg+29

Bitte nochmals überprüfen. Leider ist mapillary nicht eindeutig. Aber alles deutet auf 29a hin!
computerfarmer (2024-02-18 10:18:35+00:00): Am Kinndergarten steht 29, die Jugendfarm hat 31. Quelle: lokale Erhebung
pitfire (2024-02-18 10:41:16+00:00): Nein, die 29 steht in großen Lettern vor dem Tor zum südlichen Grundstück. 29 a ist am Eingang zum Kontainergebäude deutlich erkennbar.
computerfarmer (2024-02-18 10:57:56+00:00): Openstreetmap lebt vom mitmachen. Mach es selbst, wenn du's besser weißt
pitfire (2024-02-19 06:09:59+00:00): Kein Problem, wenn die Hs. Nr. nachweislich ermittelt ist. 2mal 29 kann jedenfalls nicht stimmen.
HirschKauz (2024-03-11 12:47:59+00:00): Hi fabue2!  
Bei einem Park reicht es die Öffnungszeiten am Umriss einzutragen. An jedem Eingangstor einzeln zu verzeichnen ist mühselig bis unmöglich up2date zu halten und führt schnell zu Unterschieden/Fehlern.  
Mehr Info auch hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark  
Magst Du das korrigieren?
Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147578981
fabue2 (2024-03-14 12:10:18+00:00): Hi Hirschkauz, danke fuer den Hinweis, bin dran
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147578981
NorthCrab_upload (2024-02-17 16:40:17+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11630969699

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
ElliottPlack (2025-08-12 14:23:45+00:00): Hi there. some of these underground powerlines follow a point to point path that almost certainly is not how those are tunneled. Have you verified where the wires run? If you have not observed them, we can't have them running underneath the city as a 'guess'.

Thanks,

Elliott Plack  
Data Working Group  
OpenStreetMap Foundation
IsStatenIsland (2025-08-25 23:12:52+00:00): This is a tough one. I'll try looking into it. My best guess is it should follow the railroad ROW.
MxxCon (2024-02-23 17:37:39+00:00): Hello.
Rather than completely nuking the whole POI, it's better to use lifecycle prefixes, or at the very least delete biz-specific tags but leave address info implace.
Doing that ensures that the history of this object is preserved. Plus it allows for this address to remain in the database.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147579714
juliencherry (2024-02-23 19:38:33+00:00): Hello! I was going to retain the node but the JOSM data validator gave me a “Duplicate house numbers” warning because the building itself has the same address information. Should I ignore this warning in situations like this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147579714
MxxCon (2024-02-23 20:49:06+00:00): In this case, yes since the node represents a retail/commercial space downstairs.
juliencherry (2024-02-24 16:41:01+00:00): That makes sense. Is it possible to recreate the node and maintain its history?
MxxCon (2024-02-26 06:50:05+00:00): You can use tool like https://revert.monicz.dev/ to revert this changeset restoring it to the previous state and then perform your edit.
juliencherry (2024-02-26 15:16:03+00:00): Done, thanks!
Sanniu (2024-02-18 14:41:26+00:00): Hi, you have added house number with fictitious "Recycle glass" street. There is, indeed, recycle container there, but not with such address. Can you, please, fix the tagging?
MrSledge (2024-04-19 22:46:41+00:00): Hi.
The borders of Tanzania(relation/195270) are incorrect in the intersection with Kakamba(relation/8313939)(Tanzania is slightly crossing the borders of Kakamba). Please fix it.
Thank you!
NorthCrab (2024-05-03 01:49:29+00:00): Hey! I just fixed the country boundary after someone else edit. I don't usually fix other broken relations because it's painful to do with iD.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 02:13:35+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216506446/history has tracktype = 2 that was added in this edit
Maybe it was supposed to be tracktype=grade2 ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Atracktype
Rongel (2026-02-04 06:47:19+00:00): You are correct, tracktype=grade2 would be the correct specification. I believe it was created by mistake at the time. This should be corrected.
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2024-02-17 21:24:33+00:00): Im Tag „name“ soll nur der Eigenname stehen (s. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen und die Diskussion im Forum https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/adressen-und-namen-von-ladestationen/108364 ). Der Name „bike-energy“ ist kein Eigenname.
M_Gaugg (2024-02-20 16:58:58+00:00): Danke für deine Infos, werde ich in Zukunft berücksichtigen.
TrickyFoxy (2024-02-18 20:21:10+00:00): Это запрещёно. Откат.
literan (2024-02-23 11:19:15+00:00): икона это не "публичное произведение искусства" (если она не в музее), их создают с другой целью. Выберите другой тег для этого, пожалуйста (или пишите пропозал на новый). Тут удалю.
trufiAssociation (2024-08-20 14:48:08+00:00): Saludos cordiales, 

Por favor no adicionen las rutas de combis como una vía mas, estos deben ser agregados como una relacion por favor revisa la  documentacion.
Juan MAS (2024-08-24 18:00:43+00:00): Saludos, corregí geometría de lo existente, habrá que reemplazar esa información de la ruta.