piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-10 04:44:56+00:00): Instead of smashing the keyboard, can you please leave a more detailed changeset comment/description?  What did you change, and why?  Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139682723
ZeLonewolf (2024-02-11 16:37:20+00:00): Change reverted; roads are posted private.  See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/StreetSurveyor/blocks

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147334707
StreetSurveyor (2024-02-11 20:15:22+00:00): Do you think 'permissive' might be more appropriate? I don't recall seeing any signs in here and there were no gates. Your argument for making Newport streets private were the gates and there were none here. Trying to make productive edits and not have edit wars. :-)
ZeLonewolf (2024-02-11 22:00:04+00:00): In the photo I took, there is a both a gate (presumably, normally left in the open position) and the word "PRIVATE" on the "Cedar Rock Meadow" sign on the stone pillars that hold the gate. Nothing about this indicates that permission has been granted.
aharvey (2025-05-22 01:52:23+00:00): In my changeset from 2023-02 at http://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133064253 I noted the construction then later that year I see you've removed the construction area and redrawn the demolished buildings even though construction was still ongoing? https://www.newgreenschatswood.com.au/news

We'll need to resurvey here...
aharvey (2026-05-19 13:17:21+00:00): Yep... looks like this changeset was incorrect to redraw the demolished buildings from outdated imagery. I've updated them now.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-12-19 14:06:28+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145293501
pantufla (2023-09-15 07:33:33+00:00): Rigel, a la autopista yo le dejería el nombre viejo como alt_name y old_name. Qué opinas?
OilStation (2024-03-14 13:08:50+00:00): 这进村道路岔口点上标的指路牌，请问用意是什么？方便导航吗？
ywanght (2024-03-18 01:56:59+00:00): 是的，发现基于OSM制作的Garmin Edge地图似乎对区域识别不佳，难以导航，于是我就在村口添加一个点来作为导航点。
watmildon (2025-02-18 06:03:12+00:00): Really nice work on the school!! I added the mascot= tag here so that it shows up on my mascot map.

https://en.osm.town/@watmildon/114012435012771032
jacobwhall (2023-08-10 02:47:25+00:00): Addresses note 3671473

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3671473
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-15 10:24:42+00:00): Thanks for cleanup!

Have you reverted all their edit?
citrula (2023-08-15 14:00:18+00:00): Yes, since most of them seemed to be the result of selecting random options in the mapping app they used I chose to revert all of them.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-10 22:50:26+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism and sockpuppet account

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139726567
user_5359 (2023-08-10 06:04:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you use any tool or website to insert the data? Unfortunately, the data is entered with absolutely the wrong key, so that repairing the SPAM entry is not really recommendable.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-10 22:50:27+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism and sockpuppet account

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139726567
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-09-06 10:13:56+00:00): Tại sao lại xóa đường vậy bạn?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139686453
Dao Quoc Huy (2023-09-07 02:00:27+00:00): Chào bạn! Line cũ (160717215) đã thay thế bằng Line mới sau đó (1197981113) bạn nhé. Đây có thể là một quyết định xử lý không chính xác của tôi vào thời điểm đó. Cảm ơn bạn đã thông báo!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139686453
phoenixsaigon1698 (2023-09-07 02:10:09+00:00): Lần sau anh xem kĩ lại giúp tất cả các edit của mình và ghi rõ là anh đã làm gì chứ ghi chung chung create a new changeset ko ai biết hết. Mà anh dùng editor của riêng anh nên mình không biết có hiện warning như OSM-ID khi anh xóa quá nhiều đường như vậy hay không. Ở các changeset sau tôi đã comment về việc anh đã xóa quá nhiều tuyến đường quan trọng ở ngay nội thành Saigon, Hà Nội luôn.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139686453
Dao Quoc Huy (2023-09-07 05:00:34+00:00): Dear bạn, tôi đã ghi nhận ý kiến đóng góp và điều chỉnh cách làm. Các changesets sẽ được chia nhỏ theo phạm vi hành động để tiện theo dõi. Các hoạt động xoá nếu có sẽ ghi chi tiết lý do trong comment. Trân trọng cảm ơn sự đóng góp vì cộng đồng!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139686453
Jakka (2023-08-10 06:37:04+00:00): is the hole building book store ?All levels ....
Deleted bookstore point changed it into bookstore area
LunThick (2023-08-10 12:35:11+00:00): https://youtu.be/kkNQiLg-rgs
https://youtu.be/gDgzpgP_yoQ

In this video you can tell that 2 levels are used 1st level is like you know a bookshop and the 2nd level is like a Comecon discussions about the books no idea what the third level would be
Jakka (2023-08-10 16:01:31+00:00): Yes that are difficult to add.
On node both inside the building shape, if they are close to each other, possible only one will be shown on the regular map. Put the level:ref to it see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level:ref
The other perhaps also on node:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Darts_centre
Best regards
Aarogya Pandey (2024-05-27 15:16:16+00:00): Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139687554
bxl-forever (2023-08-10 12:34:33+00:00): Your changeset has been reverted.

The app asked specifically about the "Oliobox" container, that is the orange container for cooking oil.

You entered data that suggests that this Oliobox accepts clothes and shoes, this is nonsense.  Clothes and glass-recycling containers are mapped separately.

I suppose all 3 containers are still there and fixed the tags appropriately.
MxxCon (2023-09-14 08:42:41+00:00): Why did you delete the whole building here?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139688221
Olga Degterenko (2023-09-14 10:57:04+00:00): There was duplicate listing for the restaurant. The correct listing is this one https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=N&osmid=11055596470&class=amenity
Rainero (2023-08-10 18:33:00+00:00): Achtung, da waren nicht nur die PLZen falsch, auch der Straßenname bei Keuslinstraße 9 - 17 ungerade, 10 - 16 gerade (falsch: Agnesstraße).

Hab's korrigiert.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
literan (2023-08-10 20:52:48+00:00): завандалили здание. https://osmcha.org/changesets/139688933

Аккуратнее, пожалуйста. Исправлю.
Svalbard (2023-08-15 09:16:34+00:00): Hallo lberges,
welche Quelle stand Dir zu Änderung des Straßennamens [1] von "Tongrube" nach "Zur Tongrube" zur Verfügung?
Gruß Svalbard

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387710533#map=17/54.01852/9.41341&layers=D
lberges (2023-08-22 06:21:21+00:00): Als Postleitzahl ist 25596 eingetragen, die PLZ von Wacken. Die Straße zu dieser PLZ heißt "Zur Tongrube", vgl. ein paar 100 Meter weiter links.
Peter Wollerup (2023-11-15 14:02:20+00:00): New compagny name from 25. aug. 2023: Proplast A/S
Niels GM (2023-11-15 14:59:48+00:00): Navn ændret
Falsernet (2023-08-16 03:45:52+00:00): Hi.

The floor is paved in the same way as a bus stop. There may not be a flag but I don't see any visible reason why this wouldn't be used as a bus stop. What made you delete it?
Mapping Dutchman (2023-08-10 20:29:18+00:00): Dag emvee,
Ik zag dat u deels de (harde?) spaties tussen de cijfers van het telefoonnummer heeft weggehaald.
Uit het soort wijzingen en edits die u doet, maak ik op dat u dat met een reden doet.
Ik vind het verwarrend, de Wiki voor de telefoon (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone) staat spaties toe. In het verleden noteerde ik ook wel de nummers zoals u en kreeg dan van andere gebruikers de feedback dat het incorrect was.
Kijk uit naar uw toelichting en hoop er van te leren.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Mapping Dutchman
emvee (2023-08-11 06:02:35+00:00): Prima vraag.

Ik kijk regelmatig naar campings en in het licht daarvan haal ik regelmatig een lijst op van alle campings en haal die door een script om de telefoonnummers te verifiëren. Dat doe ik met een script dat is gebaseerd op https://pypi.org/project/phonenumbers/

Dat script gaf een foutmelding op het nummer, het zag alleen "+31".

In telefoonnummers mogen inderdaad gewoon spaties staan, maar geen harde spaties https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spatie#Harde_spatie

Die heb ik aldus verwijderd.
emvee (2023-08-11 06:09:18+00:00): Even verder gekeken, er is ook nog een camping node met dezelfde naam.

Dat is niet een goed idee, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:One_feature,_one_OSM_element. Ik zou de node weg halen en alle tags die nog niet op deze camping "way" daar naar toe verplaatsen.

Ik zie trouwens dat het telefoonnummer ook in de camping node is bijgewerkt, niet door mij maar door cEvLGWiQ. Die werkt zeer regelmatig telefoonummers bij, zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/cEvLGWiQ/history
Mapping Dutchman (2023-08-14 10:40:55+00:00): Dag Emvee,
Dank voor de duidelijke uitleg en verwijzingen. Beide waren echt leerzaam.

De "node" heb ik verwijderd en de "way" heb ik aangepast.

Maakt het telefoonnummer script gebruik van de Overpass (Turbo) API?
emvee (2023-08-14 21:27:20+00:00): > Maakt het telefoonnummer script gebruik van de Overpass (Turbo) API?

Nee, hoewel dat prima zou kunnen.

Ik maak gebruik van een zogenaamde .pbf file van Nederland, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PBF_Format en werk die regelmatig bij. Daarna run ik er osmium tags-filter op, https://docs.osmcode.org/osmium/latest/osmium-tags-filter.html en laat die een .opl file genereren, zie https://osmcode.org/opl-file-format/

Die tekst file laadt ik dan weer binnen in een python script dat o.a. telefoonnummers controleert.
Frans S (2023-08-22 13:18:18+00:00): Hello .
You managed to duplicate 60 buildings which were already mapped by another mapper.
How is that possible?
Mostly because you did not zoom in far enough to see already mapped objects.
On the bottomline of iDedior a blue field shows if there are objects hidden. Zoom in till that message disappears and start mapping
Best regards
mueschel (2023-08-14 09:57:45+00:00): Hi,
bitte schau mal nach deinen Tags: Du hast einige "plant:output:electricit" anstelle von "plant:output:electricity" gesetzt.
geozeisig (2023-08-14 12:46:36+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Das war sehr aufmerksam.
mueschel (2023-08-15 08:43:27+00:00): Danke, schaust du auch nach den 21 anderen? 
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1yVY
geozeisig (2023-08-15 08:51:56+00:00): Da muss sich der Fehler in JOSM eingeschlichen haben. Und wenn man es nicht gleich bemerkt vervielfältigt es sich.
Danke noch mal
Andrea Del Sarto (2025-02-05 22:19:12+00:00): ciao MrLusignana,
su tutte le fonti che ho trovato la GEA finisce a Passo dei Due Santi con 25 tappe, quale è la fonte dell'inserimento di questa tappa 26?

grazie e saluti
MrLusignana (2025-02-06 09:28:38+00:00): Ciao Andrea: Hai ragione, credo. Qualche tempo fa, quando stavo lavorando su OpenStreetMap ho notato che il routing GEA era stato inserito molto male con il risultato che i profili di elevazione erano incomprensibili. Ho corretto tutti gli errori tecnici ma non ho aggiunto/omesso nessuno dei tratti. Il tratto 26 è quasi certamente un errore. Ho camminato lungo il percorso diversi anni fa e non ricordo di aver visto alcun segno GEA, ma controllerà prima di eliminare. Grazie per aver sollevato la questione.
eggie (2023-08-10 07:24:04+00:00): Dag PieterJan   Je hoeft geen bicycle=no toe te voegen aan wandelpaden met G7 bebording. Dat is default.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-10 15:10:45+00:00): De defaulttags heb ik verwijderd.
Het zal echt niet voor iets anders routeren. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-10 07:30:43+00:00): Dag Vince... Wanneer er niet gefietst mag worden dan moet dat aangegeven zijn net als access=no... Staat hier een bord Verboden Toegang?
Wanneer je access=no tagt hoef je niet nog bicycle=no te taggen.
Wanneer men een pad bewust laat dichtgroeien dan taggen we disused:highway=path Dan rendert het niet meer op de kaart en voorkomt opnieuw intekenen.
Wanneer het gewoon onmogelijk is om het pad te bewandelen, maar het is gewoon in de tijd dichtgegroeid en je komt er met geen mogelijkheid doorheen dan taggen we
smoothness=impassable

De vraag is wat is nu de status van het pad?
access=no?   Staat er een bord?
Mag je er echt niet fietsen?

Dan is verder de combinatie access=no en foot=yes bijna altijd fout.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-10 07:40:18+00:00): Ik heb vehicle=no toegevoegd ipv de aparte categorieën. 

Alle vliegen in één klap. access=no heb ik verwijderd.. of er moet een bord Verboden toegang staat muv wandelaars. Laat maar weten.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-08-10 07:43:30+00:00): smootness=bad heb ik toegevoegd....  impassable als er echt geen doorkomen meer aan is.. zelfs niet met een kapmes.
Vince_pnp (2023-08-10 07:59:59+00:00): OK.
Er staat geen bord, maar het pad wordt niet meer bijgehouden en groeit dicht.
eggie (2023-08-10 10:16:29+00:00): Mooi... dan kun je het evt. als het dichtgegroeid is aanpassen naar disused:highway=path
Mapse verder..
eggie
eggie (2023-08-10 07:35:21+00:00): Beste Vince   Dit was al correct getagd met permit.

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=139691573

MVG
eggie
Vince_pnp (2023-08-10 08:25:47+00:00): Ow. Ik zag een verschil tussen deze en een gelijke afsluiting aan de Heierkerkweg te Venlo.
eggie (2023-08-10 10:18:55+00:00): Ahhh.. oke... Je kunt ook de voorgaande mapper vragen waarom hij het zo getagd heeft.

Access tagging is lastig.. de conditional tag stond hier al op.

Groet

eggie
Patr1k_P (2023-08-18 14:34:08+00:00): cyklotrasa je znacena, to vsak neznamena ze cesta ma byt cycleway...tento sposob znacenia pouzivajte ak tam je znacka pre cyklistov

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway
Patr1k_P (2023-08-18 14:27:52+00:00): ake prepojenie cesty? cesta tam uz bola a nakreslili ste na existujucu cestu dalsiu a navyse s nazvom ktory tam nepatri, vasa zmena bola vymazana
Ropino (2023-09-28 10:25:55+00:00): Hi,
please check/correct:
"highway=P" ?!
thx in advance
Frans S (2023-08-11 12:48:41+00:00): Hello.  A remark.
Here you mapped all (80) buildings over each other.
Please read the how to map information. 
 Is it possible that you don't zoom in far enough to get already mapped buildings into your view screen? Check the lowest line on your screen. When there is a blue piece which says that there are buildings  hidden, you need to zoom in till they are visible
Best regards.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139692486
SomeoneElse (2023-08-14 11:22:19+00:00): Following the revert I've deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1196119570/history
niederas (2023-08-10 07:52:07+00:00): review_requested war nur aus versehen, ich seh grad nicht wo ich das wieder ändern kann.
user_5359 (2023-08-10 08:54:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO SPAM entry (mostly foreign keys)!
gscholz (2023-08-11 06:51:54+00:00): Hi vadony,
your recent edits tend to create overlapping ways like this one here (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=1.97818&lat=43.80107&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gendy54 (2023-08-20 22:13:29+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai fait quelques corrections sur la boutique. Vous pouvez rajouter les horaires avec https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:opening_hours
Frans S (2023-08-11 12:34:11+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info),
A: C: Not accurately drawn and squared.
B: Overlapping buildings.
No idea how you managed that, but you duplicated existing mappings, so now nearly each building has been mapped twice !  
When you want to adjust buildings, just move the whole mapped building over the correct footprint.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139694256
gscholz (2023-08-11 06:53:58+00:00): Hi lenny32,
your recent edits have left behind errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=0.82034&lat=43.88410&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
lenny32 (2023-08-11 08:20:15+00:00): thank you for your vigilance, I will correct them
eggie (2023-08-10 15:37:31+00:00): Dag Luycks   Je vraagt feedback.
Lijkt me oke.. Routeren zal het overigens niet, want er is access=private getagd.
Het vlak van de parkeerplaats zou je nog kunnen intekenen met amenity=parking access=private

MVG
eggie
balint36 (2023-10-28 11:20:20+00:00): A magyar helyesírás és a magyarországi vasutak címkézése (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Vas%C3%BAt) alapján a helyes írási mód GYSEV (végig nagybetűvel).
Kérlek, ügyelj erre!
Köszönöm!
user_125718 (2023-10-08 17:47:09+00:00): Kannst du mal bitte landuse=graas bzw. landuse=meadow benutzen, natural=grassland gibt es in Deutschland (noch) nicht, das stand lange falsch im Wiki. Danke!
AurélienQ (2025-05-31 13:40:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne suis vraiment pas certain que cette relation est correcte. D'abord car la désignation "chateaux de la loire" désigne l'entièreté des châteaux de la vallée, et non pas les quelques plus connus, et ensuite car cette désignation engloble un périmètre vaste, variable, imprécis, jamais définis.

Ainsi, contrairement aux relations tels que les dénominations de région culturelles, je pense que cette relation n'a pas se place sur OSM.
Je supprime donc la relation.

Si tu n'es pas d'accord, je suis ouvert à la discussion, et il sera peut être plus simple de la continuer sur le forum OSM france (forum.openstreetmap.fr).

Cordialement,

Aurélien
BotaFlo64 (2025-05-31 14:22:59+00:00): Bonjour @AurélienQ 

ok, dommage. Juste je trouvais ça utile. Mais je n'ai vraiment pas le temps ni l'énergie de chercher à argumenter.

:-(
bigopenmac (2023-08-10 09:46:02+00:00): Обратите, пожалуйста, внимание, что в тег name нужно указывать значения на белоруском языке. Вам же это не сложно поменять в скриптах?
gscholz (2023-08-14 07:41:14+00:00): Hi JLZIMMERMANN,
your recent activities have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=5.31738&lat=44.02332&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Especially landuse relations are affected here. Can you please fix this?

May be you like to educate yourself about the basics of multipolygon relations:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Kind regards
Guido
greenbudgie (2023-08-10 14:19:17+00:00): merhaba

ilkokulun adını, binasını ve bahçesini kapsayan bir 'school grounds' halihazırda bulunuyor (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1172496875).

önceden olmayan bilgiler de 'grounds' içine aktarıldı. 

bu yüzden eklenen nodeler silinecek. aksi halde aynı okuldan 3 tane olmuş oluyor. maps.me uygulamasında okulun bilgileri gözükmüyor ise bu maalesef maps.me uygulamasından kaynaklı.
eteb3 (2023-08-10 09:43:31+00:00): Forgot source for gate bypassing cattle grid on Anstey moor: 

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/4730838 supported by Note 3658067
Tomas Straupis (2023-08-10 13:03:24+00:00): Pagal Lietuvos žymėjimo susitarimus, nereikia braižyti atskirais vektoriais šaligatvių. Tam yra žymos prie highway=*** sidewalk=left|right|both.
Alexia Schoonjans (2023-11-02 14:41:38+00:00): Attention, il ne faut pas connecter les champs aux routes sinon ça abîme la carte.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1196733979
Frans S (2023-08-11 13:29:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings need to be improved to meet the quality standards of HOTOSM.
Please pay attention to next summarized issues. (see attached document for more info)
A: C: Not accurately drawn and squared.
B: Overlapping buildings.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139698078
silversurfer83 (2023-08-11 07:27:01+00:00): Moin

du hast wieder keine Quelle für die Namen angegeben. Bitte sag uns, wo du die Namen der Gehöfte recherchiert hast. Danke

silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139698235
lberges (2023-08-11 10:45:49+00:00): Telefonbuch und diese Listen. An der Diskussion hast Du Dich auch beteiligt: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beratungsresistente-user-und-deren-verbotene-quellen/97142/56
silversurfer83 (2023-08-11 11:25:01+00:00): Eben
Und wir wissen, dass das Telefonbuch keine geeignete Quelle für uns ist.
Außerdem meine ich mich erinnern zu können, dass die Ansage lautet nur Namen zu erfassen, die auch vor Ort durch (große) Schilder vom Betreiber aufgestellt kontrollierbar sind.
Außerdem sollst du (und ich und jeder andere) deine Quellen im CS angeben.

Ich fordere dich auf alle Namen, die du nicht vor Ort oder durch uns zur Verfügung stehende Straßenfotos validiert hast, wieder zu entfernen.
streckenkundler (2023-08-12 21:40:13+00:00): @silversurfer83 Volle Zustimmung! Danke! Mindestens das muß geschehen! Eigendlich müssen diese Daten vollständig entfernt werden (Stichwort @DWG und redacted)
silversurfer83 (2023-08-13 04:29:26+00:00): Die erste Reaktion kam ja relativ schnell. Wie siehts denn aus? Einsicht?
rhtb0 (2023-08-14 05:13:54+00:00): https://t.me/osmKorea
해당 링크는 오픈스트리트맵 공식 텔레그램 방으로
혹시나 의견이나 질문이 있으시다면 커뮤니티에 참여해 주시면 감사하겠습니다.