piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dimitar155 (2023-03-23 18:58:46+00:00): По първоначалния план беше само "Сливница" (който в момента е "Сливница 1"). В последствие кмета на Сливница поиска да има втори вход/изход за индустриалните предприятия и по спомен го нарече "изход Сливница изток". Сега потърсих статията, но не я намирам. Намерих само статия за Драгоманските изходи, които официално са изток и запад (https://www.mediapool.bg/magistralata-ot-sofiya-do-srabskata-granitsa-shte-e-gotova-v-kraya-na-2024-g-news346082.html). Вече върнах имената както си бяха.
foreigner037 (2023-03-23 19:12:07+00:00): Тук съм съгласен, че всеки ги нарича както си иска без изобщо да се съобразява и се получават конфликти. Например ПВ Благоевград - Юг на Струма го наричат също и ПВ Зелен дол (дори и АПИ):
https://m.fuelo.net/m/roadcondition/7926?lang=de
https://www.focus-news.net/novini/regioni/Protestut-otputen-vuzel-Zelen-dol-se-premesti-na-glaven-put-E-79-1531162

Това настрана, официалните чертежи на трасето са доста лаконични, така че не знам това 1/2 откъде се е появило и защо Драгоманските са Изток/Запад:
http://roads-bg.eu/v2/index.html#pam=14/23.071/42.840/100000000000000000000000000000011
foreigner037 (2023-03-23 19:16:43+00:00): Ако ме питаш мен лично това 1/2 е страшно нелепо и Изток/Запад щеше да е много по-смислено. Ако в България, както във 99% от другите страни, възлите се номерираха според поредния си номер, а не според километража, това изобщо нямаше да е необходимо.

Абе друго си е някой чужденец да погледне картата и да види ПВ Девня с номер 390 😎
Dimitar155 (2023-03-23 19:25:49+00:00): В такъв случай мога да ги върна на изток и запад, а 1 и 2 да ги сложа в official_name?
foreigner037 (2023-03-23 19:45:57+00:00): Няма смисъл, нека да стоят така. Все пак са официалните имена, каквото и да си говорим тук.
dgmapping (2023-03-19 17:27:21+00:00): Please use amenity=pharmacy and healthcare=pharmacy tags for only pharmacies. Shops like "Looduse Abi", that sell cosmetics, nutritional supplements and other health products, are not pharmacies and should be tagged with something else like shop=nutrition_supplements or shop=chemist
Zverik (2023-03-19 20:06:56+00:00): ok
jpennycook (2023-03-19 01:00:47+00:00): Hi!

1. Could I ask you to provide proper changeset comments? "change" doesn't really tell anyone anything. Ideally, some combination of why you made the edits, what you changed, and what your source was (e.g. survey, aerial imagery, etc.). When you save your changeset, you can also select "Sources" in the "Add fields" box, which will allow you to record your sources. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_change
3. If you're interested in improving the alignment of roads or paths in the UK, you should look at using the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer https://osmuk.org/cadastral-parcels/ as this provides lines that are perfectly aligned, making it easier to align the aerial imagery (I tend to use walls/fences in housing estates for the alignment).

Jon
user_16720371 (2023-03-21 15:09:12+00:00): Hi, thanks for the input will keep that in mind. I an interested in the latter part of your message about the Cadastral Parcels to align misaligned roads. I have tried following the instructions on the given link but when I scroll down to the layers selection there is no option on mine for OSMUK Cadastral Parcels?
Cebderby (2023-03-21 16:19:08+00:00): In iD, below the main list of layers there's another list of "Overlay"s, it should be in there (eg 7th of 9 in that list for me).  Turning that on should show you blue lines for the land ownership boundaries.  Then scroll further down the same panel to the bottom to get a grey box with 2 numbers in the middle.  You drag with the mouse on the grey area to move the current imagery (eg Esri/Bing etc) relative to the blue lines.  Try to ignore all of the OSM mapped features and anything on the imagery well above ground level, eg if you re-edit here, you'll see a nice rectangle of blue lines matching the low wall around the lighthouse group of buildings.  (The more the imagery isn't vertical, ie you can see some of the side walls of buildings, the more careful you have to be to match to ground level features eg the bases of walls.)  And ignoring the OSM mapped features takes some practise (in JOSM you can turn off the OSM data while you align but not in iD I think).  Hope this helps. Cebderby (Clive)
marczoutendijk (2023-03-23 20:39:25+00:00): change???
What kind of comment is that?
We are always changing something.
Can you improve on your comments please?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2023-03-23 20:39:20+00:00): change???
What kind of comment is that?
We are always changing something.
Can you improve on your comments please?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2023-03-23 20:39:13+00:00): change???
What kind of comment is that?
We are always changing something.
Can you improve on your comments please?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
user_16720371 (2023-03-23 20:43:59+00:00): You don't need to comment on every edit and secondly what has it got to do with you? Who are you to question someone in this manner? Thanks for your opinion but do feel free to shove it where the sun doesn't shine. Thanks.
marczoutendijk (2023-03-23 20:39:08+00:00): change???
What kind of comment is that?
We are always changing something.
Can you improve on your comments please?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
user_16720371 (2023-03-25 11:20:38+00:00): Hi, I've read the ban, and would like to make an apology for my remarks. It was rude and unprofessional.  I have also taken note about giving more detail about the changes I make in future changes.

All the best..
mavl (2023-03-24 10:30:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134051515, 134045911, 134058112 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6981].
marczoutendijk (2023-03-23 20:39:03+00:00): change???
What kind of comment is that?
We are always changing something.
Can you improve on your comments please?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2023-03-23 20:38:53+00:00): change???
What kind of comment is that?
We are always changing something.
Can you improve on your comments please?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2023-03-23 20:38:58+00:00): change???
What kind of comment is that?
We are always changing something.
Can you improve on your comments please?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2023-03-23 20:38:48+00:00): change???
What kind of comment is that?
We are always changing something.
Can you improve on your comments please?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2023-03-23 20:38:42+00:00): change???
What kind of comment is that?
We are always changing something.
Can you improve on your comments please?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Wetterhorn (2023-03-19 11:50:36+00:00): De commentaarregel en daadwerkelijke edit spreken elkaar wat tegen; je hebt de picknicktafel verwijdert. Was dat je bedoeling?
Moofins (2023-03-22 14:24:54+00:00): Ja, er was geen picnic tafel meer. Ik gebruik de StreetComplete app, als ik aan het wandelen ben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete denk dat de commentaarregel automatisch gegenereerd is?
Wetterhorn (2023-03-22 17:50:24+00:00): Aah, check, duidelijk, dankjewel!
marczoutendijk (2023-03-23 20:38:36+00:00): change???
What kind of comment is that?
We are always changing something.
Can you improve on your comments please?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
flohoff (2023-03-18 20:13:50+00:00): Moin,
ich sah hier die Kapelle und den Changeset Kommentar. Wenn du da so weitere informationen hast kannst du die z.b. in das "description" tag packen. Baujahre gehen auch in "start_date"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date

Und Inschriften kann man "inscription" hinterlassen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:inscription

Und noch viel Cooler ist - Wenn man gleich ein Bild mit Mapillary macht - Dann kann man da immer drauf verweisen wenn mal Fragen aufkommen.

Also - Es ist immer viel zu tun ;)


Flo
Soshal Distan Singh (2023-03-18 14:29:58+00:00): + network:wikidata
trial (2023-03-24 21:45:27+00:00): salut, une bonne raison de ne pas utiliser facebook= ?
LudovicG (2023-03-26 16:37:32+00:00): Bonjour,  
Ah... je me rends compte que j'ai bêtement ajouté un "contact:" devant "website" alors que je voulais mettre un "contact:facebook" en fait.
Je modifie.
Merci pour la remarque.
silversurfer83 (2023-03-19 19:52:03+00:00): Hi (comment in English because the CS isn't in Germany),

Again: Your CS-Comment doesn't help. And you did not cite your sources. You deleted a name and added a lot of buildings.
Please say more than "Added Information" and, when mapping outside of Germany, use English or the local language of the place you edited. Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133825324
Kevin@RouteYou (2023-04-19 18:37:36+00:00): Is the walking network in the Nationaal Park Hoge Kempen an actual node network? As I understood it is a network made up of routes but not really node based. Are the node numbers still relevant or are they obsolete? https://www.nationaalparkhogekempen.be/nl/wandelen. Regards, Kevin.
Eebie (2023-04-19 22:22:47+00:00): De knooppunten in die Limburgse wandelgebieden zijn "wandelwissels".
Het zijn punten op gemarkeerde rondwandelingen, waar je van de ene wandelingen naar de andere kan wisselen.  Ze staan op bordjes ter plaatse (zie https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wandelwissel_Limburg.jpg ) en ze staan op de kaarten. Zie https://www.wandeleninlimburg.be/nl/webwinkel/nationaal-park-hoge-kempen/streekkaart-nationaal-park-hoge-kempen/17/
Kevin@RouteYou (2023-04-20 06:56:27+00:00): Hallo. Bedankt voor je input. Als ik het goed begrijp ontbreekt alleen de topologie tussen de nummers op terrein. Je hebt als wandelaar geen idee dat je van, bijvoorbeeld, knooppunt 233 naar knooppunt 176 moet wandelen? Je moet weten welk symbool je wil volgen? Groeten, Kevin.
Eebie (2023-04-21 08:55:07+00:00): Er zijn inderdaad geen wegwijzers naar een wandelwisselnummer zoals bij knooppuntwandelingen. Er zijn enkel de bordjes met het symbool van de rondwandeling. Als je rondwandelingen wil combineren aan wandelwissels moet je die met de kaart noteren zoals bij knooppuntwandelingen. De wandelwisselnummer staan op de kaarten op de borden bij het begin van de wandelingen.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-03-20 19:06:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133911345 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert on user request (Ticket#2023032010000145)
DenisJu (2023-04-10 08:47:32+00:00): Hello! 
Thank you for making your contribution in this region.
Can you tell me why you marked "nat_ref" tag as unnecessary and also completely deleted it in the street SH27 (Berdice e Madhe - Velipoje)?
Hugoren Martinako (2024-12-21 17:47:50+00:00): Buenas, aquí introdujiste la etiqueta "ref:ene" a mayores de "ref". Dicha etiqueta solo se usó esta vez, ¿qué significa? y ¿puede combinarse con ref, para simplificar?
cronoser (2024-12-27 01:11:56+00:00): Es el número de sondeo, que viene en este PDF https://energia.gob.es/petroleo/Exploracion/EstadisticasPetroleo/DatosBibliotecaConsumer/2009/EstadisticaHidrocarburos_2009.pdf del ministerio de Industria, no sé hasta qué punto nos interesa guardarlo. Un saludo
Hugoren Martinako (2024-12-30 09:58:54+00:00): La idea es que al ser una clave muy corta, y no tener wiki asociada, no se entiende su significado. Una mejora es modificar este tipo de claves por algo, o bien más descriptivo, o bien encapsularlo en algo como ref:ES:ene (ejemplos: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Importaciones_en_Espa%C3%B1a/Lista_de_referencias_nacionales)

Si crees que no aporta (y en mi opinión con apenas 5 usos, no merece la pena mantenerla) pues más sencillo borrarla.

Saludos
cronoser (2025-01-09 00:07:59+00:00): Hola, ya está borrada :-) Un saludo
adrianojbr (2023-03-18 16:54:33+00:00): Olá, paauanli!

A única correção que precisei fazer foi o formato de CEP que deve ser NNNNN-NNN.

Abraço!
ika-chan! (2023-03-29 13:48:33+00:00): What are the sources for your edits?
eliyahu bowers  𐤀𐤋𐤉𐤄𐤅 𐤁𐤅𐤅𐤓𐤎 (2026-07-05 20:54:54+00:00): I am looking to consolidate road tagging in technion so I would like to know why you used "sett" and not "paving_stones".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
NeatNit (2026-07-05 20:58:55+00:00): I don't remember, but it was probably that the example photo in StreetComplete was most similar to the surface. I was fairly new to editing OSM at that time so it's possible I got it wrong. If you surveyed the area and think it should be different, feel free to change it.
marczoutendijk (2023-03-27 11:34:18+00:00): What are the sources for your edits?
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:01:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.
MxxCon (2023-03-20 00:50:11+00:00): I think these ways should've been edited the other way...I think it's more correct for the node to be a parking position and ways adjusted as taxiway or apron or whatever other tag is appropriate for these.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133827672
Truchin (2023-03-19 21:10:17+00:00): Revert effectué
MxxCon (2023-03-20 00:50:58+00:00): Similar to the previous edit, I think nodes should be parking_position and ways as something else
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133827775
gscholz (2023-03-20 09:12:13+00:00): Hi Cristian ,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-74.14130&lat=4.61632&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133827916

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software an looks ugly on the maps.

Can your please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
eggie (2023-03-30 10:02:04+00:00): Beste Erik.. Geef svp concreet commentaar bij je edits. 
Ik probeer die vehicle=no 'fouten'op te sporen. Er is geen beginnen aan. 

Wat is Wandeling voor een edit?.. of Hulst? 
Medemappers stellen concreet commentaar op prijs. 
MVG
eggie
Mashin (2023-03-18 20:20:37+00:00): Hi, thanks for editing. 
Just be careful, here you moved surveillance camera tags from a node where the camera is located to the whole parking lot area:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2738874385
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268535989
Yaaaaaaaa (2023-03-18 20:49:10+00:00): Hi, thx for checking. The tags on the way were already here. I just removed the ones from the nodes to avoid duplicate.
Mashin (2023-03-19 07:15:50+00:00): Ah you're right, the duplication was there before.
Though I think in this case it was supposed to be resolved the other way around: keep tags on node and remove them from area. 
Since surveillance cameras are defined as point features
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance
surveyor54 (2023-03-20 09:14:00+00:00): Hallo mp747474,
willkommen bei OSM.

Es wäre schön, wenn du bei deinen Änderungen auch einen Änderungssatzkommentar hinzufügen würdest, gerade bei Löschungen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Gute_%C3%84nderungssatz-Kommentare%E2%86%99

Gruß
surveyor54
surveyor54 (2023-03-26 08:12:41+00:00): Hi,
Openstreetmap ist ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt, deshalb finde ich es nicht schön,
dass du meinen Kommentar einfach ignorierst.

Gruß
surveyor54
mp747474 (2023-03-26 09:24:02+00:00): sorry, hab den Kommentar nicht gesehen. wird nicht wieder vorkommen.
surveyor54 (2023-03-26 12:36:39+00:00): Danke 👍 😄
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-18 17:04:33+00:00): Is there a reason you deleted a bunch of tags?  For example, you removed permissive and private tags from a parking lot, each one seems valid.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133828404
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-18 17:05:42+00:00): On more thorough exam, yeah, what you did looks correct.  Just removing it from the node itself.  I'll assume you checked to see that the ways have the appropriate tags that you are removing?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133828404
Yaaaaaaaa (2023-03-18 19:52:26+00:00): Correct, as indicated in the update title, this is the removal of tags on nodes that are duplicate with same tag on the way. Osmose is a quality checker that helps identify many kind of issues, I recommend you have it a try. osmose.openstreetmap.fr
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-18 19:56:50+00:00): I'm familiar with Osmose.  I'm used to people just clicking through to "hide" the errors or "resolve" it, such as road/water crossings that aren't done with care.  lol

Keep up the awesome work.  Your changesets only popped up on OSMCha due to golf edits.  :D
Truchin (2023-03-19 21:09:35+00:00): Revert effectué
Truchin (2023-03-19 21:08:54+00:00): Revert effectué
Carto'Cité (2023-03-30 14:18:33+00:00): Hello.

I see you disconnected two "POIs" from the indoor room. However these are reception desks (hence the tag amenity=reception_desk in addition to tourism=information) : it makes sense to put them on the edge between the public indoor=area and the private indoor=room. I moved the door to its precise location (dervied from plans *and* survey) and the footway that connects to the door.

Best regards,
Antoine from Carto’Cité for #GaresSNCF project
SekeRob (2023-03-30 15:04:31+00:00): Hi,

Yes, the issue was though that these POI were flagged as having to be standalone. Maybe map them with virtual paths to these indoor room walls.

PS, only came here to fix some way conflicts when JOSM editor flagged these. Why information windows have to be mapped separate but wall mounted defibrillator, atm are fine on building/room walls but as we call them 'sportello' somehow are not.

For your "Objets trouvés" there's a tag office=lost_property and amenity=lost_property_office. Both have a OSM wiki page. Maybe add these and remove the tourism tag will stop the alert.

ciao
gscholz (2023-03-20 09:15:19+00:00): Hi David,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-74.14130&lat=4.61632&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133829176

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software an looks ugly on the maps.

Can your please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
NorthCrab_upload (2023-03-18 16:30:19+00:00): 🗺️ Witaj na OpenStreetMap!

Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera niepoprawne adresy. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:

Adres jest niekompletny, brakuje informacji o nazwie ulicy. Jeśli adres ma nazwę ulicy, dodaj ją w addr:street. Jeśli nie, zamień addr:city na addr:place - tak oznaczamy adresy bez ulic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1155257640

Dokumentacja adresów (po polsku):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr:*

W razie problemów lub pytań, proszę pisać. Chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam! 🦀
hybridOL (2023-11-30 23:42:07+00:00): Hi, Du hast die Kastanienstraße auf vehicle=no gesetzt. Ist das korrekt, also vollständiges Fahrverbot auf nur genau dieser Straße?
GerdP (2023-12-01 07:50:32+00:00): Gute Frage!
Dort stehen ein VZ250, darunter ein maxweight 9t und darunter ein Schild "Radfahrer und Anliefer frei", also
traffic_sign=DE:250;262[9],1020-12
Das Verkehrszeichentool macht daraus die von mir eingetragenen Attribute:
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=250,262%5B9%5D,1020-12
Vermutlich müsste es aber vehicle=destination heissen?
GerdP (2023-12-01 07:56:19+00:00): Mit dort meinte ich diese Stelle https://www.osm.org/node/7094652707. An dieser Kreuzung https://www.osm.org/node/2664072333 steht nur das 9t Schild. Vielleicht eine seltsame Form von Einbahnstraße?
GerdP (2023-12-02 08:53:45+00:00): Habe mal im Forum nachgefragt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133829656
Truchin (2023-03-19 05:49:27+00:00): Bonjour Pierrot,

Merci pour tes contributions mais ces éléments n'existent pas sur le terrain.

Il faudrait faire un revert.

Bonne poursuite
Truchin (2023-03-19 21:07:42+00:00): Revert effectué
gscholz (2023-03-20 09:14:34+00:00): Hi Leonardo,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-74.14130&lat=4.61632&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133830023

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software an looks ugly on the maps.

Can your please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Facalderonm (2023-03-24 01:33:22+00:00): Hola Leonardo, sus cambios han eliminado trozos de la vía de TransMilenio. Le pido por favor corrija esto. Gracias.
Leonardo Gutierrez (2023-04-18 15:36:14+00:00): Saludos, habiamos encontrados vias superpuesta por ello el error.   Ya lo corregiremos, Gracias por estar atento. Saludos del grupo de maperos de Duitama
Leonardo Gutierrez (2023-04-18 15:39:40+00:00): Estuve revisando la Ruta D, y tiene muchos problemas (no solo la intervencion que hice),   Tiene usted quiza la traza de esta ruta para corregirla?   Saludos.
gscholz (2023-03-20 09:18:52+00:00): Hi nicolas:D,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-74.14130&lat=4.61632&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=133830078

As you may know, this kind of error irritates routing software an looks ugly on the maps.

Can your please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Allison P (2023-03-18 20:37:50+00:00): Names should not be used as descriptions. name=Field 5 should become ref=5 with no name, and "Batting Cage" should have no name.
Jarrardi (2023-03-19 22:23:18+00:00): Yay learning stuff! Thank you so much, I'll change them! Should the names remain blank even if there are large signs on each ballfield saying, "Field 5", "Field 2", etc.?
mavl (2023-03-24 10:29:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 134051515, 134045911, 134058112 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6981].
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-04-22 14:01:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135228709, 135225625 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to fictional edits.