prompter: How would have the world changed and how would it look like today if barter were the only way of payment up to this day?
assistant: We would have never progressed economically beyond the ancient era.
prompter: Provide a more detailed response.
assistant: If barter had remained the only form of payment up until the present day, the world would be vastly different from what it is today. The lack of a standardized medium of exchange would make economic transactions much more complicated and less efficient. People would need to find individuals who have the exact goods or services they want and who also want the exact goods or services that they have to offer. This type of direct exchange is called barter, and it was the earliest form of payment.

In such a world, money would not exist as we know it today. Instead, people would have to resort to bartering goods and services with each other. This would make trade more difficult, as people would need to find someone who has what they want and wants what they have. This could lead to a lack of specialization, as people would have to produce all the goods and services they need, rather than just producing what they are good at and trading with others for the rest.

The lack of money would also make it difficult to store wealth, making it difficult for people to accumulate assets over time. This would in turn make it difficult for people to invest in things like education, training, or new business ventures, which would hold back economic progress.

Furthermore, the absence of money would also make it difficult for governments to tax their citizens, making it challenging to fund public goods and services such as roads, schools, and hospitals. In turn, this would impact the overall quality of life and standard of living for people.

Overall, if barter remained the only form of payment, the world would look vastly different than it does today. The complexity of barter would have greatly slowed the development of trade and commerce, leading to a much less advanced and less prosperous world.
prompter: I can see that. Given barter was a primitive way of trading, I can see how the complexity of financial decission would be decrease up to a point of just interchanging assets
assistant: Yes, that's correct. With barter, there is a limited number of goods and services that can be traded and exchanged. This can limit the scope of economic transactions, making it challenging to trade with people who live in different regions or who produce different goods and services. As a result, barter would have limited the growth of trade, commerce, and economic interdependence between people, regions, and nations.

The lack of a standardized medium of exchange would have also created a number of other difficulties in the economic realm. For example, it would have made it challenging to calculate the value of goods and services, as well as to compare the prices of different goods and services. This would have made it difficult for people to make informed decisions about how to allocate their resources.

In conclusion, while barter may have been a primitive way of trading, it would have had significant limitations that would have held back economic progress and development. The widespread adoption of money and other forms of payment have made it possible for people to trade more easily, to store wealth more efficiently, and to invest in things like education, training, and new business ventures.