An Act To Maximize the Benefits of Renewable Energy in Maine
Maine Legislature, Session 127, LD 1329
Committee: Energy, Utilities and Technology
Sponsors: O'CONNOR, WOODSOME, DUNPHY, FOLEY, GROHMAN, HIGGINS, TIMBERLAKE, WADSWORTH, McCORMICK
Amends: 35-A MRSA §3210-C, 35-A MRSA §3402, 35-A MRSA §3403, 35-A MRSA §3404, 35-A MRSA §3451-A, 35-A MRSA §3452, 35-A MRSA §3454, 35-A MRSA §3457, 38 MRSA §352

Legislative Document 
No. 1329 
H.P. 904 
House of Representatives, April 14, 2015 
An Act To Maximize the Benefits of Renewable Energy in Maine 
(EMERGENCY) 
Reference to the Committee on Energy, Utilities and Technology suggested and ordered 
printed. 
ROBERT B. HUNT 
Clerk 
Presented by Representative O'CONNOR of Berwick. 
Cosponsored by Senator WOODSOME of York and 
Representatives: DUNPHY of Embden, FOLEY of Wells, GROHMAN of Biddeford, 
HIGGINS of Dover-Foxcroft, TIMBERLAKE of Turner, WADSWORTH of Hiram, Senator: 
McCORMICK of Kennebec. 
Emergency preamble. Whereas, acts and resolves of the Legislature do not 
become effective until 90 days after adjournment unless enacted as emergencies; and 
Whereas, wind energy development has the potential to significantly affect the 
State's environment and quality of place assets; and 
Whereas, the process for approving the siting of wind energy development needs to 
be modified immediately to ensure appropriate factors are considered; and 
Whereas, in the judgment of the Legislature, these facts create an emergency within 
the meaning of the Constitution of Maine and require the following legislation as 
immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety; now, 
therefore, 
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows: 
Sec. 1.  35-A MRSA §3210-C, sub-§1, ¶A, as amended by PL 2007, c. 293, §1, 
is further amended to read: 
A.  "Capacity resource" means any renewable capacity resource, nonrenewable 
capacity resource or interruptible, demand response or energy efficiency capacity 
resource. 
Sec. 2.  35-A MRSA §3210-C, sub-§1, ¶A-2 is enacted to read: 
A-2.  "Firm" means, with respect to a capacity resource or energy, the portion of the 
capacity or energy that is guaranteed to be available at a given time. 
Sec. 3.  35-A MRSA §3210-C, sub-§1, ¶B, as enacted by PL 2005, c. 677, Pt. C, 
§1, is amended to read: 
B.  "Interruptible, demand Demand response or energy efficiency capacity resource" 
means a resource that has demand response, interruptible or energy efficiency 
capacity recognized by the commission. 
Sec. 4.  35-A MRSA §3210-C, sub-§3, as amended by PL 2013, c. 424, Pt. A, 
§20, is further amended to read: 
3.  Commission authority.  The commission may direct investor-owned 
transmission and distribution utilities to enter into long-term contracts for: 
A.  Capacity Firm capacity resources;  
B.  Any available firm energy associated with firm capacity resources contracted 
under paragraph A: 
(1)  To the extent necessary to fulfill the policy of subsection 2, paragraph A; or 
(2)  If the commission determines appropriate for purposes of supplying or 
lowering the cost of standard-offer service or otherwise lowering the cost of 
electricity for the ratepayers in the State.  Available energy contracted pursuant to 
this subparagraph must be firm and energy may be sold into the wholesale 
electricity market in conjunction with solicitations for standard-offer supply bids; 
and 
C.  Any available renewable energy credits associated with firm capacity resources 
contracted under paragraph A.  The price paid by the investor-owned transmission 
and distribution utility for the renewable energy credits must be lower than the price 
received for those renewable energy credits at the time they are sold by the 
investor-owned transmission and distribution utility. 
The commission may permit, but may not require, investor-owned transmission and 
distribution utilities to enter into contracts for differences that are designed and intended 
to buffer ratepayers in the State from potential negative impacts from transmission 
development.  To the greatest extent possible, the commission shall develop procedures 
for long-term contracts for investor-owned transmission and distribution utilities under 
this subsection having the same legal and financial effect as the procedures used for 
standard-offer service pursuant to section 3212 for investor-owned transmission and 
distribution utilities. 
The commission may enter into contracts for interruptible, demand response or energy 
efficiency capacity resources.  These contracts are not subject to the rules of the State 
Purchasing Agent.  In a competitive solicitation conducted pursuant to subsection 6, the 
commission shall allow transmission and distribution utilities to submit bids for 
interruptible or demand response capacity resources. 
Capacity Firm capacity resources contracted under this subsection may not exceed the 
amount necessary to ensure the reliability of the electric grid of this State, to meet the 
energy efficiency program budget allocations articulated in the triennial plan as approved 
by the commission pursuant to section 10104, subsection 4 or any annual update plan 
approved by the commission pursuant to section 10104, subsection 6 or to lower 
customer costs as determined by the commission pursuant to rules adopted under 
subsection 10. 
Unless the commission determines the public interest requires otherwise, a firm capacity 
resource may not be contracted under this subsection unless the commission determines 
that the firm capacity resource is recognized as a capacity resource for purposes of any 
regional or federal capacity requirements. 
The commission shall ensure that any long-term contract authorized under this subsection 
is consistent with the State's goals for greenhouse gas reduction under Title 38, section 
and the regional greenhouse gas initiative as described in the state climate action plan 
required in Title 38, section 577. 
Sec. 5.  35-A MRSA §3210-C, sub-§4, as amended by PL 2007, c. 293, §3, is 
further amended to read: 
4.  Priority of firm capacity resources.  In selecting capacity resources for 
contracting pursuant to subsection 3, the commission shall apply the following standards. 
A.  The commission shall select firm capacity resources that are competitive and the 
lowest price when compared to other available offers for capacity resources of the 
same or similar contract duration or terms. 
B.  Among firm capacity resources meeting the standard in paragraph A, the 
commission shall choose among capacity resources in the following order of priority: 
(1) New interruptible, demand response or energy efficiency capacity resources 
located in this State; 
(2)  New renewable firm capacity resources located in this State; 
(3) New firm capacity resources with no net emission of greenhouse gases; 
(4)  New nonrenewable firm capacity resources located in this State. The 
commission shall give preference to new nonrenewable firm capacity resources 
with no net emission of greenhouse gases; 
(5)  Capacity Firm capacity resources that enhance the reliability of the electric 
grid of this State.  The commission shall give preference to capacity resources 
with no net emission of greenhouse gases; and 
(6)  Other firm capacity resources. 
Sec. 6.  35-A MRSA §3210-C, sub-§6, as amended by PL 2009, c. 518, §4, is 
further amended to read: 
6.  Competitive solicitation process and contract negotiation.  Except as provided 
in paragraph A, for purposes of selecting potential firm capacity resources for contracting 
pursuant to subsection 3, the commission shall conduct a competitive solicitation no less 
often than every 3 years if the commission determines that the likely benefits to 
ratepayers resulting from any contracts entered into as a result of the solicitation process 
will exceed the likely costs.  Following review of bids, the commission may negotiate 
with one or more potential suppliers.  When only one bid has been offered, the 
commission shall ensure that negotiations are based on full project cost disclosure by the 
potential supplier.  The commission shall negotiate contracts that are commercially 
reasonable and that commit all parties to commercially reasonable behavior. 
A.  The commission shall, for purposes of selecting energy efficiency capacity 
resources and available energy associated with such resources for contracting 
pursuant to subsection 3, conduct a competitive solicitation in accordance with this 
subsection or contract with the Efficiency Maine Trust established in section 10103 
to deliver those resources through a competitive solicitation process administered by 
the trust. 
Sec. 7.  35-A MRSA §3210-C, sub-§11, as enacted by PL 2011, c. 413, §3, is 
amended to read: 
11.  Customer benefits.  The commission may direct investor-owned transmission 
and distribution utilities to enter into contracts under this section only as agents for their 
customers and only when such contracts are in the best interest of customers and in 
accordance with this subsection. The commission shall adopt rules to ensure that: 
A.  To the extent the benefits to ratepayers of a long-term contract are projected to 
occur in the later years of the contract term, the commission shall ensure that 
adequate financial security is in place so that it is reasonably likely ratepayers will 
obtain the projected benefits of the long-term contract; and 
B.  To the extent practicable, ratepayers obtain the benefit of lower cost firm capacity 
resources of energy associated with those resources or of any renewable energy 
credits that may exist after the term of primary financing or subsequent replacement 
financing necessary for the development and construction of a generation project is 
completed.; and 
C.  Contracts for capacity are only for firm capacity resources. 
Sec. 8.  35-A MRSA §3402, as amended by PL 2009, c. 615, Pt. A, §2 and PL 
2011, c. 682, §38, is further amended to read: 
§3402.  Legislative findings 
The Legislature finds that it is in the public interest to explore opportunities for and 
encourage access to and the development, where appropriate, of wind renewable energy 
production in the State in a manner that is consistent with all state and federal 
environmental standards and that achieves reliable, cost-effective, sustainable energy 
production on those sites in the State that will attract investment and permit the 
development of viable wind energy projects.  The Legislature finds that the access to 
renewable energy resources and the development of the wind renewable energy potential 
in the State needs to be integrated into the existing energy supply and transmission 
systems in a way that achieves system reliability, total capital cost-effectiveness and 
optimum short-term and long-term benefits to Maine people.  The Legislature finds it is 
in the public interest to encourage the construction and operation of community wind 
power generation facilities in the State.  For the purposes of this chapter, "community 
wind power generation facility" means an electricity-generating facility at any one site 
with instantaneous generating nameplate capacity of not more than 10 megawatts that is 
powered entirely by wind energy.  The Legislature also finds it is in the public interest to 
encourage wind renewable energy research and the development of wind renewable 
energy generation equipment manufacturing facilities in the State. 
1.  Contribution of renewable energy development.  The Legislature finds and 
declares that the wind energy resources of the State constitute a valuable indigenous and 
renewable energy resource and that wind energy development, which is unique in its 
benefits to and impacts on the natural environment, makes a significant contribution to 
the general welfare of the citizens of the State for the following reasons: 
A.  Wind energy is an economically feasible, large-scale energy resource that does 
not rely on fossil fuel combustion or nuclear fission, thereby displacing electrical 
energy provided by these other sources and avoiding air pollution, waste disposal 
problems and hazards to human health from emissions, waste and by-products; 
consequently, wind energy development may address energy needs while making a 
significant contribution to achievement of the State's renewable energy and 
greenhouse gas reduction objectives, including those in Title 38, section 576; 
B.  At present and increasingly in the future with anticipated technological advances 
that promise to increase the number of places in the State where grid-scale wind 
energy development is economically viable, and changes in the electrical power 
market that favor clean power sources, wind energy may be used to displace 
electrical power that is generated from fossil fuel combustion and thus reduce our 
citizens' dependence on imported oil and natural gas and improve environmental 
quality and state and regional energy security; and 
C.  Renewable energy resources within the State and in the Gulf of Maine have the 
potential, over time, to provide enough energy for the State's homeowners and 
businesses to reduce their use of oil and liquid petroleum-fueled heating systems by 
transition to alternative, renewable energy-based heating systems and to reduce their 
use of petroleum-fueled motor vehicles by transition to electric-powered motor 
vehicles.  Electrification of heating and transportation has potential to increase the 
State’s energy independence, to help stabilize total residential and commercial energy 
bills and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 
2.  Need for modification of regulatory process for siting wind energy 
developments.  The Legislature finds that it is in the public interest to reduce the 
potential for controversy regarding improve the process for the siting and permitting of 
grid-scale wind energy development by expediting development in places where it is 
most compatible with existing patterns of development and resource values when 
considered broadly at the landscape level by ensuring against undue environmental and 
economic impacts from wind energy developments both individually and cumulatively.  
Accordingly, the Legislature finds that certain aspects of the State's regulatory process for 
determining the environmental and economic acceptability of wind energy developments 
should be modified to encourage the siting of wind energy developments in these areas 
that best serve the State.  Such changes include, but are not limited to: 
A.  Making wind energy development a permitted use within certain parts of the 
State's unorganized and deorganized areas; 
B.  Refining certain procedures of the Department of Environmental Protection and 
the Maine Land Use Planning Commission; and 
C.  Because the Legislature recognizes that wind turbines, including the related 
excavation, construction practices and transmission infrastructure, are potentially a 
highly visible feature features of the landscape that will diminish landscape values 
and have an impact on views and the quality of place assets, judging the effects of 
wind energy development on scenic character and existing uses related to scenic 
character based on whether the development significantly compromises views from a 
scenic resource of state or national significance such that the development has an 
unreasonable adverse effect on the scenic character or existing uses related to the 
scenic character of that resource. and, together with other similar development, an 
adverse effect on the scenic character of the State; and 
D.  Because the Legislature recognizes that electricity produced from wind energy 
may have a potentially detrimental effect on ratepayers, judging the effects of wind 
energy development on electric rates and charges, both on an individual development 
and cumulative basis.  
The Legislature further finds that, while wind energy may be developed at many sites 
with minimal site-specific environmental impacts, wind energy developments may have, 
in addition to their beneficial environmental effects, economic and potential scenic 
impacts, both specific adverse environmental effects and cumulative, that must be 
addressed in state permitting decisions pursuant to approval criteria tailored to address 
issues presented by wind energy development.  Nothing in this section is meant to 
diminish the importance of addressing as appropriate site-specific and cumulative impacts 
on quality of place assets and natural values, including, but not limited to, wildlife, 
wildlife habitats and other ecological values. 
The Legislature further finds that development of the State's wind or other renewable 
energy resources should be undertaken in a manner that ensures significant tangible 
benefits to the people of the State, including, but not limited to, ratepayers, taxpayers and 
residents of communities that host wind energy facilities; and that the State should seek to 
host a substantial amount of or seek consumer access to wind or other renewable energy, 
if economically and environmentally appropriate, as part of a strategy to reduce 
greenhouse gas emissions and meet the goals established in the state climate action plan 
developed pursuant to Title 38, section 577. 
For purposes of this section, "quality of place assets" means those exceptional, 
marketable, place-based competitive strengths, resources and advantages that drive the 
local and regional economy and its sustainability, including sustainable economic 
activities based on natural resources, including farming, fishing, forestry, nature-based 
and heritage-based tourism and outdoor recreation and leisure, and landscapes, including 
the working landscapes of farms, forests and waterfronts. 
3.  Energy efficiency for home heating and transportation.  The Legislature finds 
that conversion or replacement energy fuel sources for powering motor vehicles and for 
heating well-insulated residential and commercial buildings may enhance energy 
independence, reduce energy costs and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 
Sec. 9.  35-A MRSA §3403, sub-§3, as enacted by PL 2007, c. 693, §5 and 
affected by §37, is amended to read: 
3.  Certification.  The commission may certify a person as a community wind power 
generator if the commission determines that such a certification would support 
construction of a community wind power generation facility in this State and that the 
person will be the owner of that facility. The person must demonstrate to the commission 
that the construction of the community wind power generation facility would not be 
likely to occur absent the availability of the benefits under Title 36, section 1760, 
subsection 89 and Title 36, sections 2017 and 5219-CC. The commission may not certify 
a person as a community wind power generator with respect to a community wind power 
generation facility for which the person commenced the site permit application process 
prior to August 23, 2006.  For the purposes of this subsection, "community wind power 
generation facility" means an electricity-generating facility at any one site with 
instantaneous generating nameplate capacity of not more than 10 megawatts that is 
powered entirely by wind energy. 
Sec. 10.  35-A MRSA §3404, as amended by PL 2009, c. 615, Pt. A, §§3 and 4, is 
further amended to read: 
§3404.  Determination of public policy; energy generation goals 
1.  Encouragement of energy development.  It is the policy of the State to ensure 
consumer access to viable energy resources outside the State and, in addition, in 
furtherance of the goals established in subsection 2, to encourage the attraction explore 
the economic viability and environmental impact of appropriately sited development 
related to wind renewable energy, including any additional transmission and other energy 
infrastructure needed to transport additional offshore wind energy to market, consistent 
with all state environmental standards; the permitting and financing of wind renewable 
energy projects; and the siting, permitting, financing and construction of wind renewable 
energy research and manufacturing facilities. 
2.  State wind energy generation goals.  The To the extent necessary to meet state 
energy needs and to the extent viable when compared with other available renewable 
energy generation resources to meet those needs, the goals for wind energy development 
in the State are that there be: 
A.  At least 2,000 Up to 400 megawatts of installed capacity by 2015;. 
B.  At least 3,000 megawatts of installed capacity by 2020, including 300 megawatts 
or more from generation facilities located in coastal waters, as defined by Title 12, 
section 6001, subsection 6, or in proximate federal waters; and 
C.  At least 8,000 megawatts of installed capacity by 2030, including 5,000 
megawatts from generation facilities located in coastal waters, as defined by Title 12, 
section 6001, subsection 6, or in proximate federal waters. 
Sec. 11.  35-A MRSA §3451-A is enacted to read: 
§3451-A.  Requirements for developers 
1.  Additional requirements.  In addition to any other requirements of law, a person 
proposing a wind energy development shall within 30 days after making a permit filing 
with the primary siting authority, establish a fund to conduct technical analysis of the 
proposed wind energy development and to pay qualified experts to provide testimony 
regarding the proposal.  The department by rule shall establish, subject to the limit set out 
in Title 38, section 352, subsection 3, the amount of the fund.  Rules adopted under this 
paragraph are routine technical rules under Title 5, chapter 375, subchapter 2-A. 
Sec. 12.  35-A MRSA §3452, sub-§4, as enacted by PL 2007, c. 661, Pt. A, §7, is 
amended to read: 
4.  Visual impact assessment; rebuttable presumption.  An applicant for an 
expedited wind energy development shall provide the primary siting authority with a 
visual impact assessment of the development that addresses the evaluation criteria in 
subsection 3 if the primary siting authority determines such an assessment is necessary in 
accordance with subsection 3.  There is a rebuttable presumption that a visual impact 
assessment is not required for those portions of the development's generating facilities 
that are located more than 3 miles, measured horizontally, from a scenic resource of state 
or national significance.  The primary siting authority may require a visual impact 
assessment for portions of the development's generating facilities located more than 3 
miles and up to 8 miles from a scenic resource of state or national significance if it finds 
there is substantial evidence that a visual impact assessment is needed to determine if 
there is the potential for significant adverse effects on the scenic resource of state or 
national significance.  Information intended to rebut the presumption must be submitted 
to the primary siting authority by any interested person within 30 days of acceptance of 
the application as complete for processing. The primary siting authority shall determine if 
the presumption is rebutted based on a preponderance of evidence in the record. 
The primary siting authority shall make decisions under this subsection based on a 
preponderance of evidence in the record. 
Sec. 13.  35-A MRSA §3454, first ¶, as repealed and replaced by PL 2013, c. 
424, Pt. A, §21, is amended to read: 
In making findings pursuant to Title 38, section 484, subsection 3, the primary siting 
authority shall may not presume that an expedited wind energy development provides 
energy and emissions-related benefits described in section 3402 and shall make additional 
empirical findings regarding other tangible benefits provided by the development as well 
as the environmental and economic impacts of the development.  The Department of 
Labor, the Governor's Office of Policy and Management, the Governor's Energy Office 
and the Public Utilities Commission shall provide review comments if requested by the 
primary siting authority. 
Sec. 14.  35-A MRSA §3454, sub-§2, as amended by PL 2011, c. 682, §28, is 
further amended to read: 
2.  Community benefits package requirement.  Except as provided in subsection 3, 
to demonstrate that an expedited wind energy development provides significant tangible 
benefits as required in Title 38, section 484, subsection 10, the The applicant for an 
expedited wind energy development is required to establish a community benefits 
package valued at no less than $4,000 per year per wind turbine included in the expedited 
wind energy development, averaged over a 20-year period approved by the legislative 
body of the host community or communities and memorialized as a written agreement 
with the host community or communities.  This subsection does not affect the property 
tax obligations of an expedited wind energy development.  There is a lien on real estate of 
an expedited wind development located in a host community to secure the receipt by that 
host community of all benefits due to that host community under the agreement, which 
lien takes precedence over all other claims on such real estate, excepting only claims for 
taxes. 
Sec. 15.  35-A MRSA §3457, sub-§3 is enacted to read: 
3.  Decommissioning plans.  The department shall adopt rules to require that 
decommissioning plans be submitted to and approved by the department as a condition of 
approval in all grid-scale wind energy development. These rules must include, at a 
minimum, requirements for full funding for the removal of all components of the wind 
energy development, vegetative restoration of the development area and maintenance of 
public safety and environmental protection during decommissioning. The department 
shall require a written guaranty in the form of a performance bond from a 3rd-party 
guarantor that ensures sufficient funding of all decommissioning costs regardless of the 
point in history of the development at which decommissioning becomes necessary, based 
on the department's decommissioning standards in force at the time of application. 
Sec. 16.  38 MRSA §352, sub-§3, as amended by PL 2011, c. 653, §10 and 
affected by §33 and amended by c. 657, Pt. W, §5, is further amended to read: 
3.  Maximum fee.  The commissioner shall set the actual fees and shall publish a 
schedule of all fees by November 1st of each year.  If the commissioner determines that a 
particular application, by virtue of its size, uniqueness, complexity or other relevant 
factors, is likely to require significantly more costs than those listed on Table I, the 
commissioner may designate that application as subject to special fees.  Such a 
designation must be made at, or prior to, the time the application is accepted as complete 
and may not be based solely on the likelihood of extensive public controversy.  The 
maximum fee for processing an application may not exceed $250,000, except that the 
maximum fee for processing an application under chapter 3, subchapter 1, article 9 is as 
provided for in subsection 4-A.  In the case of a wind energy development, the fee plus 
the amount of the fund required by Title 35-A, section 3451-A, subsection 1 may not 
exceed a total of $1,000,000.  All staff of the department, the Department of Inland 
Fisheries and Wildlife, the Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry and the 
Department of Marine Resources who have worked on the review of the application, 
including, but not limited to, preapplication consultations, shall submit quarterly reports 
to the commissioner detailing the time spent on the application and all expenses 
attributable to the application, including the costs of any appeals filed by the applicant 
and, after taking into consideration the interest of fairness and equity, any other appeals if 
the commissioner finds it in the public interest to do so.  Any appeal filed by the applicant 
of an application fee must be to the agency of jurisdiction of the application.  The costs 
associated with assistance to the board on an appeal before the board may be separately 
charged.  The processing fee for that application must be the actual cost to the 
department, the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, the Department of 
Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry and the Department of Marine Resources.  The 
processing fee must be distributed to each department that incurs a cost to be deposited in 
the account in which the expenses were incurred in that department to reimburse the 
actual cost to that department.  The applicant must be billed quarterly and all fees paid 
prior to receipt of the permit.  At the time of the quarterly billing by the department, the 
commissioner shall review the ongoing work of the department to identify, prevent and 
mitigate undue delays or vague requirements of the application processing.  Nothing in 
this section limits the commissioner's authority to enter into an agreement with an 
applicant for payment of costs in excess of the maximum fee established in this 
subsection. 
Emergency clause.  In view of the emergency cited in the preamble, this 
legislation takes effect when approved. 
SUMMARY 
This bill makes a number of changes to the findings, scenic impact provisions and 
other provisions of law governing wind energy and renewable energy development.  It: 
1.  Modifies legislative findings regarding wind energy to expand the scope of the 
findings to include other renewable energy resources and to identify various potential 
impacts of wind energy development; 
2.  Reduces state goals for new wind energy development; 
3.  Requires grid-scale wind energy developers to file decommissioning plans and to 
provide a performance bond to guarantee the funding for decommissioning; 
4.  Requires that a community benefits package supplied by an expedited wind 
energy development to host communities be memorialized as a written agreement and 
creates a lien on the real estate of the development to secure the receipt by the host 
community of those benefits; and 
5.  Modifies the authority of the Public Utilities Commission to require transmission 
and distribution utilities to enter into long-term contracts for renewable energy capacity 
resources, and it provides that the Public Utilities Commission may require contracts only 
for firm capacity or energy.