Jump to navigation Teleflex | LMA - Better by Design  Clinical evidence Evidence Search Select product You are here Home › Evidence Search Results Basic life support trained nurses ventilate more efficiently with laryngeal mask supreme than with facemask or laryngeal tube suction-disposable – A prospective, randomized clinical trial AUTHORS: Gruber E. et al. PUBLICATION: Resuscitation 2014; 85 (4): 499–502. SUMMARY: A study to compare aspects of airway management and ventilation with the LMA Supreme™, the laryngeal tube suction-disposable and facemask ventilation when placed by nurses who had received only minimal training in their use Read more Supraglottic airways in difficult airway management: successes, failures, use and misuse AUTHORS: Timmermann A. PUBLICATION: Anaesthesia 2011; 66 (Suppl. 2): 45-56. SUMMARY: A review of the literature looking into the successes, failures, use and misuse of supraglottic airways in difficult airway management Supraglottic airway devices have an important role to play in the management of patients with difficult airways Read more The influence of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) cuff pressure on postoperative sore throat AUTHORS: Spiro M. et al. PUBLICATION: Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27 (47): 250 [Abstract 19AP3-1]. SUMMARY: A study to investigate whether over inflation of the cuff contributes to post-operative sore throat in recipients of the Fannin integral single-use laryngeal mask Read more Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airway Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model AUTHORS: Schmidbauer W. et al. PUBLICATION: Br J Anaesth 2009; 102 (1): 135-139. SUMMARY: A study to compare the oesophageal seal of the LMA Classic™, LMA ProSeal™ and i-gel™ supraglottic airway devices in human cadavers The LMA Classic™ and LMA ProSeal™ devices withstood a significantly higher oesophageal pressure than the i-gel™ in cadaver models Read more Magnetic resonance imaging study of the in vivo position of the extraglottic airway devices i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in anaesthetized human volunteers AUTHORS: Russo S.G. et al. PUBLICATION: Br J Anaesth 2012; 109 (6): 996-1004. SUMMARY: A study to compare the in situ position of the LMA Supreme™ and the i-gel™ supraglottic airway devices in anaesthetised volunteers The LMA Supreme™ protruded deeper into the upper oesophageal sphincter than the i-gel™, relative to both the glottis and to the spine Read more Lingual nerve injury following the use of an i-gel™ laryngeal mask AUTHORS: Renes S.H. et al. PUBLICATION: Anaesthesia 2011; 66 (3): 226-227. SUMMARY: A case of bilateral lingual nerve damage following the use of the i-gel™ supraglottic airway device was reported in a 69-year-old male who had undergone open inguinal herniorrhaphy under general anaesthesia Read more Sore throat and supraglottic airways: Size matters! AUTHORS: Gross J. et al. PUBLICATION: Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27 (47): 245-246 [Abstract 19AP1-5]. SUMMARY: A study to investigate whether incorrectly sized supraglottic airway devices are associated with an increase in the incidence of sore throat in the post-operative period Read more Comparison of guided insertion of the LMA ProSeal™ vs the i-gel™ AUTHORS: Gasteiger L. et al. PUBLICATION: Anaesthesia 2010; 65 (9): 913-916. SUMMARY: A study to compare the performances of the LMA ProSeal™ and the i-gel™ supraglottic airway devices in anaesthetised female patients undergoing elective gynaecological or orthopaedic surgery in the supine position Read more LMA Supreme™, i-gel™ and Laryngeal Tube Suction™ – A prospective, randomized comparative evaluation using fiberoptic and color indicator assessment techniques AUTHORS: Cremer S. et al. PUBLICATION: Poster presentation at the 14th Annual Society for Airway Management Scientific Meeting, 24-26 September 2010, Chicago, IL, USA. SUMMARY: A study to compare the performances of the LMA Supreme™, i-gel™ and Laryngeal Tube Suction™ supraglottic airway devices in patients undergoing minor surgery Read more Supraglottic airway devices: recent advances AUTHORS: Cook T., Howes B. PUBLICATION: Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 2011; 11 (2): 56-61. SUMMARY: A review of the recent advances in supraglottic airway devices Although the LMA ProSeal™ has not been shown to outperform the LMA Classic™, its efficacy and safety has been demonstrated in routine and advanced use Read more Pages 1 2 3 next › last » Featured evidence 📖 LMA Supreme™, i-gel™ and Laryngeal Tube Suction™ – A prospective, randomized comparative evaluation using fiberoptic and color indicator assessment techniques 📖 Comparison of guided insertion of the LMA ProSeal™ vs the i-gel™ 📖 Magnetic resonance imaging study of the in vivo position of the extraglottic airway devices i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in anaesthetized human volunteers 📖 The LMA Supreme™ – a pilot study 📖 Evaluation of the LMA Supreme™ in 100 non-paralysed patients 📖 LMA Supreme™ – a new single-use LMA™ with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy 📖 The Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Evidence by category LMA® Airway Management™ Contact Teleflex Medical Europe Ltd. IDA Business and Technology Park Dublin Road, Athlone Co. Westmeath, Ireland Phone: +353 (0)9 06 46 08 00 Fax: +353 (0)14 37 07 73 Email: orders.intl@teleflex.com Company notices Intellectual Property for LMA® Airway Management™ Products Intellectual Property for Atomization Products Intellectual Property for Teleflex® VaxINator™ Privacy policy The following are trademarks or registered trademarks of Teleflex Incorporated or its affiliates, in the US and/or other countries: LMA Airway Management Teleflex, the Teleflex logo, LMA, LMA Airway Management, LMA Better by Design, LMA Classic, LMA Classic Excel, LMA Evolution Curve, LMA Fastrach, LMA Flexible, LMA Gastro, LMA Guardian, LMA ProSeal, ProSeal, LMA Protector, LMA Supreme, LMA T-Bag, LMA T-Bag Plus, LMA Unique, LMA Unique Evo, Unique Evo and Cuff Pilot are trademarks or registered trademarks of Teleflex Incorporated or its affiliates in the US and/or other countries. Atomization Teleflex, the Teleflex logo, MAD, MADdy, MADgic, MADgic Airway, MAD Nasal and MADomizer are trademarks or registered trademarks of Teleflex Incorporated or its affiliates in the US and/or other countries. Except as otherwise noted, Teleflex Incorporated or its affiliates is the owner of all the trademarks referred to on this website. All brands and names are the property of their respective owners. © 2019 Teleflex Incorporated. All rights reserved. Website by Mogul.