About Elsevier Products & Solutions Services Shop & Discover Search Elsevier Connect View by community or topic Home Elsevier Connect Elsevier's reports on gender in research Elsevier's reports on gender in research Elsevier’s latest global analysis reveals progress toward gender parity, but women still trail men in number of publications and citations March 4, 2020 - Updated June 7, 2021 Portugal report 2021 Global report 2020 Global report 2017 Germany report 2015 Related resources Gender in the Portugal Research Arena: A Case Study in European Leadership Over the last two decades, Portugal has exhibited the largest percentage increase in women’s representation — an impressive 10% — putting the country at the leading edge of closing the gender gap in research. Gender in the Portugal Research Arena: A Case Study in European Leadership offers a data-led look at the dynamics underlying Portugal’s leading edge. At the same time, it points to persisting gender gaps in research that require stronger transformative efforts, and it reveals how these gaps tend to mimic and perpetuate structural inequalities between women and men. Together with distinguished academic leaders in Portugal, we have worked to put into context quantitative analyses with policy perspectives, insights and best practices. We hope to contribute insights from the experience of one country to inform policy and inspire targeted initiatives among policymakers, research leaders and funders around the world to achieve gender equity in research. View the report Want to know more? You can join a public webinar on June 16 and hear from experts about lessons learned and ways forward. Join our webinar Key findings Women represent nearly 50% of active authors in Portugal — the closest to gender parity for all EU28 countries analyzed. Women are highly represented across the life sciences and health sciences fields, where gains in Portugal continue to be largest, and in chemistry, chemical engineering and psychology. They remain most underrepresented within the physical sciences, especially in fields related to data science and AI such as computer science, mathematics and engineering In Portugal, women are most highly represented among first authors, indicative of greater gender representation for early-career researchers. Also, unlike the trend seen in other countries, women researchers are likely to continue publishing over time, thus remaining in research. Portugal’s leadership is the result of many deliberate steps, the result of specific policy initiatives and a coordinated approach to targeted interventions. Such efforts are combined with a longstanding commitment to strong early education STEM interventions and research on gender equality, as well as funding to implement work-life balance and gender equity plans. Rosa Monteiro, Secretary of State for Citizenship and Equality, Portugal As Rosa Monteiro, Secretary of State for Citizenship and Equality, Portugal, states in the report: The latest report gives us a positive picture of gender diversity progress in research. This seems to accompany women’s increased participation in the labor market. However, we also see that research reproduces structural gender inequality patterns. For example, having men with longer publication histories and established international networks is a reflection of career interruptions and the reality that women still shoulder a much larger share of unpaid care work than men over the life course, with gender gaps in terms of pay and vertical segregation. Figure key: In the figures below and throughout the report, the following acronyms are used: PRT, Portugal; DNK, Denmark; ITA, Italy; EU28, an aggregate regional comparator that includes Portugal, Denmark, Italy and 25 additional European Union countries, including the UK. Figure 1-1. The percentage of women and men among researchers in Portugal and comparators during the period 2014–18. (Source: Scopus and NamSor) Figure 1-2. The percentage of women and men among researchers in all research and selected subject areas in the physical sciences in Portugal during the period 2014–18. (Source: Scopus and NamSor) Gender report 2020: The Researcher Journey Through a Gender Lens While the participation of women in research is increasing overall, inequality remains across geographies and subject areas in terms of publication outputs, citations, awarded grants and collaborations. That is among the findings of Elsevier's latest gender report, which you can download for free. The report, titled The researcher journey through a gender lens, examines research participation, career progression and perceptions across the European Union and 15 countries globally in 26 subject areas. View the report Focus on Japan (English) Focus on Japan (Japanese) Based on 20 years of data from Scopus across 12 geographies and all 27 Scopus subject areas, this is the third report Elsevier has produced on gender in the research landscape. It follows a global report released in 2017 and a report on Germany in 2015. As with these previous studies, the 2020 report serves as a vehicle for understanding the role gender plays in the global research enterprise. Among the changes it brings are improvements in the methodology of inferred gender disambiguation of authors in Scopus and expanded analyses to cover a total of 16 countries/regions. It also includes new elements, such as career progression and collaboration network analyses and perspectives from researchers. Key findings While overall the representation of women in research is increasing, inequality remains. Data show where effort is still needed to ensure equality for women in terms of publication outputs, citations, awarded grants, and collaborations. Research participation In all countries studied and the EU28, the ratio of women to men among all authors was closer to parity during a recent 5-year period compared with a decade ago. Men are more highly represented among authors with a long publication history while women are highly represented among authors with a short publication history. Research footprint On average, women researchers author fewer publications than men in every country, regardless of authorship position. The least difference in the number of publications by women compared to men is observed among first authors, and the biggest difference is observed among all authors. Among first authors, the average citation impact of men is higher than that of women, suggesting gender bias in citation practice. Publishing careers and mobility The percentage of women among all authors in the cohort declines over time (between the year of authors’ first publication in 2009 up to 2018) in all countries and regions except Portugal. In every country, the percentage of women who continue to publish is lower than men who continue to publish. Collaboration networks Across many subject areas and countries, men tend to have more co-authors than women and this difference is wider for authors with a longer publication history. Women and men are more similar in the way they are connected to their potential collaborative space (second-order collaborators) through their direct collaborators. Researcher perspectives Researcher attitudes towards gender diversity and equity vary widely among men and women. Most of the differences in viewpoints are related to the importance in individual places on gender balance and to the perception of fairness in the academic system. Survey question Survey response to the statement: "In my organization, women have to perform better than men to be considered good at their job," by gender and subject area. There are two opposing opinions on the causes of gender imbalance and inequality in academia. Some groups (men and women) attribute gender inequality to the attitudes and ambition levels of women. Other groups attribute gender inequality to a systemic and cultural (unconscious) bias against women. Data While the report itself is rich in terms of the data presented, we are pleased to make the underlying data available for non-commercial research purposes. This report incorporates methodology of inferred gender disambiguation of authors in Scopus. It has expanded analyses to cover 16 countries and regions. In addition, it includes career progression and collaboration network analyses as well as perspectives from researchers. Use the Tableau dashboards to look at all the countries and subject-specific author gender statistics. Comparing across countries within a selected subject Comparing across subjects within a selected country Download the raw data behind the report from Mendeley Data Repository This report also draws on qualitative data to illustrate the diverse viewpoints of researchers related to gender diversity and equity. This qualitative data was derived from surveying researchers as illustrated below. For a detailed breakdown of the methodology, check out Appendix A in the report Qualitative data methodology To cite this report De Kleijn, M, Jayabalasingham, B, Falk-Krzesinski, HJ, Collins, T, Kuiper-Hoyng, L, Cingolani, I, Zhang, J, Roberge, G, et al: The Researcher Journey Through a Gender Lens: An Examination of Research Participation, Career Progression and Perceptions Across the Globe (Elsevier, March 2020) Retrieved from www.elsevier.com/gender-report Webinar The Researcher Journey Through a Gender Lens: Findings from Elsevier’s Report Available on demand, recorded May 27, 2020. Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, PhD, Elsevier's VP of Research Intelligence, and Bamini Jayabalasingham, PhD, Senior Analytical Product Manager, guide you through the key findings from the report, their implications and future actions. Register here Expert commentary Research insight 3 leading women in research on Elsevier’s gender report findings Ian Evans March 13, 2020 6 mins Research insight Gender equity: Where will we be in 10 years’ time? Ian Evans March 27, 2020 5 mins Research insight Elsevier leaders on Scholarly Kitchen: We need to work together to close the gender gap Alison Bert, DMA March 17, 2020 3 mins Report 2017: Gender in the Global Research Landscape Gender balance in research: new analytical report reveals uneven progress Elsevier examines research performance through a gender lens in global, cross-disciplinary study By Alice Atkinson-Bonasio | 8 March 2017 There is widespread agreement that fostering diversity is integral to innovation in research, and gender equality is key to achieving this. Critical issues related to gender disparity and bias must be examined by sound studies to support a data-informed approach to implementing interventions and policy related to gender inequality. A report released today provides unprecedented insight into these issues. Gender in the Global Research Landscape was produced by Elsevier in partnership with global experts to provide an analytical framework for better understanding the role of gender within the structure of the global research enterprise. Based on 20 years of data from Scopus and ScienceDirect – across 12 geographies and all 27 Scopus subject areas – the report is an evidence-based examination of global research performance through a gender lens. Read more Report 2015: Mapping Gender in the German Research Arena Getting women to the top in science challenges Germany, per report at #GS7Eu Elsevier’s new report on gender in German research will be presented at the Gender Summit in Berlin – download it here By Lei Pan, PhD, Judith Kamalski, PhD and Elizabeth Kalinaki | 5 November 2015 In Germany, even though the number and share of female scientists has increased in the past 5 years, they are still outnumbered and lag behind their male counterparts in research performance.That was a key finding of the new report Mapping Gender in the German Research Arena, conducted by Elsevier’s Analytical Services team. It will be presented today at the Gender Summit 7 Europe in Berlin. (See the infographic at the end of this story.) Read more Related resources Corporate responsibility at Elsevier Elsevier's Inclusion & Diversity Advisory Board Solutions Scopus ScienceDirect Mendeley Evolve Knovel Reaxys ClinicalKey Researchers Submit your paper Find books & journals Visit Author Hub Visit Editor Hub Visit Librarian Hub Visit Reviewer Hub Subjects Health Life Sciences Physical sciences & engineering Social sciences & humanities About Elsevier About Careers Newsroom Events Publisher relations Advertising, reprints and supplements How can we help? Support and Contact Select location/language Global - English Copyright © 2021 Elsevier, except certain content provided by third parties Cookies are used by this site. Cookie Settings Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Notice Sitemap We use cookies to analyse and improve our service, to improve and personalise content, advertising and your digital experience. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Cookie Policy Cookie Settings Accept all cookies