BioMed Central on Twitter BioMed Central on Facebook Search About Blogs Topics BMC Series blog About this blog FOLLOW Citizen science: through the looking glass A new supplement published today in BMC Ecology looks at how citizen science is helping researchers collect data. In this blog, organizer of the supplement Poppy Lakeman Fraser explains more about what citizen science actually is and how researchers rely on this form of data collection. Dr Poppy Lakeman Fraser 22 Jul 2016 OPAL Soil Survey Deer Park Farm, Cornwall ‘“We’ve found something!”, the teenage boy shouted as he ran up the slope towards me, gasping for breath.’ Matt Keyse an OPAL Community Scientist, regales a typical session with students taking part in the Bugs Count Survey in the OPAL Scientists blog. Taking part in real science is undoubtedly a means to bring learning to life but can it have lasting benefits for scientists and policy makers alike or is it just a glorified science communication tool? The authors of the latest BMC Ecology supplement on citizen science explore this question through their experience of Open Air Laboratories (OPAL), a national citizen science network now approaching its ten year anniversary. They explore what the citizen science phenomena consists of, why people choose to commit their precious time to data collection, what kind of science can be generated and how challenges associated with this multi-aim discipline can be tackled. So what is this new movement that everyone is talking about? There are a huge number of definitions and principles for citizen science but boiled down to its essence, it largely does what it says on the tin: it is about citizens (i.e. non-expert voluntary members of the public) doing science (driven by professional scientists, policy makers or their own ideas). While data collection by volunteers has taken place for centuries (indeed long before Darwin was measuring finch beaks), the contemporary term emerged from democratic and awareness-raising ideals (see Davies et al. for the evolution of citizen science). Data collection, once the reserve of rich ‘gentleman scientists’, is now open to everyone as a result of a new wave of technology supporting the collection, storage, visualization and interpretation of data. You can now instantly send a report of a diseased ash tree for official government monitoring, spend ten minutes squirrelling away on your computer working out the structure of proteins in your body, or improve the habitats in your local area and monitor the impact on pollinators across a whole year. Indeed on scistarter.com you can even search for projects to do ‘in the car’ or ‘while fishing’. Why are there a whole army of people out there who want to get involved? Learning and a sense of giving back are frequently citied as significant drivers for people wanting to get involved. However, these are only a few reasons. The latest paper by Everett et al. explores not only people’s initial reasons for wanting to get involved but also what supports and prevents people from staying involved. One person fed back: “I think OPAL goes into more depth which is good, and feels more ‘sciencey’ [sic] – new word. It’s got me interested in going a bit further with researching, rather than just plopping about in a field or puddle, nice as these activities are” What the science says If you search for citizen science on ISI Web of Knowledge you will be presented with almost 12,000 papers on this topic, or you can delve into whole text books about the subject. OPAL has contributed to this new field of literature by publishing a number of reports and papers on the findings from its eight national surveys. Their latest papers in BMC Ecology explore the results from the OPAL Biodiversity Survey and OPAL Water Survey. Gosling et al. conducted an analysis of the Biodiversity Survey data and found that urban hedgerows are important habitats for wildlife and hard surfaces adjacent to the hedges have a considerable impact on both plant and invertebrate communities. Rose et al’s. analysis of the OPAL Water Survey – a national assessment of water quality and clarity in England, found that almost 30% of lakes fell in the highest quality group. The paper also stressed that one of the greatest challenges of using citizen science data is the reliability of data collected by amateurs. The evaluation Sitting at the interface between outreach and research, citizen science inevitably faces challenges with competing aims, operational approaches and outputs. Here Lakeman-Fraser et al. explore some of these trade-offs and suggest operational solutions to navigate these muddy waters. How can you get involved? So, if this has intrigued you to find out how citizen science can change the world (or your world!) then head to the OPAL website– they’ve just launched their new survey on pollinators. Perhaps you’re a citizen science practitioner wanting to learn from others – why not join up to the British Ecological Society Citizen Science Special Interest Group or the European Citizen Science Association (ECSA). After an inspiring ECSA International conference in Berlin in May, the (US based) Citizen Science Association and the Australian Association will be hosting networking events next year- come along! Liked the blog? Now read the research: Surveying the citizen science landscape: an exploration of the design, delivery and impact of citizen science through the lens of the Open Air Laboratories (OPAL) programme OPEN ACCESS ALTMETRIC Topics: Biology Tags: BMC Ecologycitizen science SHARE THIS POST < PREVIOUS POST A venue for all your conference publications 21 Jul 2016 NEXT POST > Sniffing out a new mouse model for investigating Alzheimer’s disease 01 Aug 2016 View the latest posts on the BMC Series blog homepage COMMENTS Dr Poppy Lakeman Fraser Dr Poppy Lakeman Fraser is the Senior Programme Coordinator for the Open Air Laboratories (OPAL) initiative, a citizen science partnership based in the Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London. Prior to her role in setting up the European Citizen Science Association she worked at the Natural History Museum in London assessing data quality in public participation projects. She has a PhD in global change ecology for her investigating the impacts of climate change and land use modifications on wildlife. POPULAR BMC SERIES BLOG TAGS POPULAR POSTS Most readMost shared Open Data at the BMC Series Tweets by @BMC_series ARCHIVES October 2021 4 September 2021 6 August 2021 4 July 2021 7 June 2021 6 May 2021 3 April 2021 5 March 2021 4 February 2021 7 January 2021 4 December 2020 4 November 2020 5 View archives About About our blog network Copyright information Community Guidelines About BioMed Central Network Blogs On Biology On Medicine On Health On Society On Physical Sciences Research in progress blog BMC Series blog Bugbitten Related Blogs SpringerOpen blog Network Topics Biology Medicine Health Developing World Open Access Technology Publishing Community Network RSS Feeds Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook Follow us on LinkedIn Follow us on YouTube By continuing to use this website, you agree to our Terms and Conditions, Community Guidelines, Privacy statement and Cookies policy. © 2017 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Nature.