Title: From Theft to Bomb-Making: The Ripple Effect of Unlearning in Defending Against Jailbreak Attacks
Primary area: alignment, fairness, safety, privacy, and societal considerations
Keywords: unlearning, ripple effect, jailbreak defense, llm

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are known to be vulnerable to jailbreak attacks. An important observation is that, while different types of jailbreak attacks can generate significantly different queries, they mostly result in similar responses that are rooted in the same harmful knowledge (e.g., detailed steps to make a bomb). Consequently, unlearning-based approaches have been proposed to mitigate jailbreak attacks by directly removing harmful knowledge from the model. In this paper, we identify a novel ripple effect of unlearning, wherein LLMs can implicitly unlearn harmful knowledge that was not explicitly introduced during the unlearning phase (e.g., a model unlearning the steps for theft may also implicitly unlearn the steps for making a bomb). Through over 100 experimental runs spanning multiple models, attack strategies, and defense methods, we empirically validate this phenomenon, which makes unlearning-based methods able to decrease the Attack Success Rate on unseen harmful questions from more than 70\% to less than 10\% with only 100 training samples. Further analysis reveals that the strong generalization ability of unlearning may stem from the intrinsic relatedness among harmful responses across harmful questions (e.g., response patterns, shared steps and actions in response, and similarity among their learned representations in the LLM). We also discuss the generalization boundary of the observed ripple effect. We hope our research could contribute to a deeper understanding of unlearning.

TL;DR: We identify the ripple effect of unlearning: LLMs can implicitly unlearn harmful knowledge that was not explicitly introduced during the unlearning phase.