Title: HugAgent: Evaluating LLMs in Simulating Human-Like Individual Reasoning on Open-Ended Tasks
Primary area: datasets and benchmarks
Keywords: LLMs, human simulation, human-like reasoning, individual reasoning, open-ended tasks, agent simulation, benchmarking, cognitive AI, cognitive science

Abstract: Simulating human reasoning in open-ended tasks has been a long-standing aspiration in AI and cognitive science. While large language models now approximate human responses at scale, they remain tuned to population-level consensus, often erasing the individuality of reasoning styles and belief trajectories. To advance the vision of more human-like reasoning in machines, we introduce HugAgent (Human-Grounded Agent Benchmark), a benchmark for average-to-individual reasoning adaptation. The task is to predict how a specific person would reason and update their beliefs in novel scenarios, given partial evidence of their past views. HugAgent adopts a dual-track design: a synthetic track for scale and systematic stress tests, and a human track for ecologically valid, “out-loud” reasoning data. This design enables scalable, reproducible evaluation of intra-agent fidelity: whether models can capture not just what people believe, but how their reasoning evolves. Experiments with state-of-the-art LLMs reveal persistent adaptation gaps, positioning HugAgent as the first extensible benchmark for aligning machine reasoning with the individuality of human thought. Our benchmark and chatbot are open-sourced as HugAgent (https://anonymous.4open.science/r/HugAgent) and TraceYourThinking (https://anonymous.4open.science/r/trace-your-thinking).

TL;DR: HugAgent benchmarks whether LLMs can simulate human-like individual reasoning in open-ended tasks by predicting belief and reasoning trajectories from partial “out-loud” data.