Title: PerSpectra: A Scalable and Configurable Pluralist Benchmark of Perspectives from Arguments
Primary area: datasets and benchmarks
Keywords: pluralism, Argument, Benchmark

Abstract: Pluralism, the capacity to engage with diverse perspectives without collapsing them into a single viewpoint, is critical for developing large language models that faithfully reflect human heterogeneity.
Yet this characteristic has not been carefully examined within the LLM research community and remains absent from most alignment studies.
Debate-oriented sources provide a natural entry point for pluralism research. Previous work builds on online debate sources but remains constrained by costly human validation.
Other debate-rich platforms such as Reddit and Kialo also offer promising material: Reddit provides linguistic diversity and scale but lacks clear argumentative structure, while Kialo supplies explicit pro/con graphs but remains overly concise and detached from natural discourse.
We introduce PERSPECTRA, a pluralist benchmark that integrates the structural clarity of Kialo debate graphs with the linguistic diversity of real Reddit discussions. Using a controlled retrieval-and-expansion pipeline, we construct 3,810 enriched arguments spanning 762 pro/con stances on 100 controversial topics. Each opinion is expanded into multiple naturalistic variants, enabling robust evaluation of pluralism. We initialise three tasks with PERSPECTRA: opinion counting (identifying distinct viewpoints), opinion matching (aligning supporting stances and discourse to source opinions), and polarity check (inferring aggregate stance in mixed discourse). Experiments with state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary LLMs, highlight systematic failures, such as overestimating the number of viewpoints and misclassifying concessive structures, underscoring the difficulty of pluralism-aware understanding and reasoning. By combining diversity with structure, PERSPECTRA establishes the first scalable, configurable benchmark for evaluating how well models represent, distinguish, and reason over multiple perspectives. We release PERSPECTRA as a resource with flexible configurations, enabling the creation of tasks beyond the demo tasks presented in this paper, and fostering progress toward pluralism-sensitive systems that more faithfully capture human heterogeneity.

TL;DR: We present PerSpectra, a scalable benchmark that integrates debate structure and linguistic diversity to evaluate pluralism in large language models.