Title: RLBFF: Binary Flexible Feedback to bridge between Human Feedback & Verifiable Rewards
Primary area: foundation or frontier models, including LLMs
Keywords: reward modeling, model alignment, inference-time control, customization, LLM post-training

Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) and Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) are the main RL paradigms used in LLM post-training, each offering distinct advantages. However, RLHF struggles with interpretability and reward hacking because it relies on human judgments that usually lack explicit criteria, whereas RLVR is limited in scope by its focus on correctness-based verifiers. We propose Reinforcement Learning with Binary Flexible Feedback (RLBFF), which combines the versatility of human-driven preferences with the precision of rule-based verification, enabling reward models to capture nuanced aspects of response quality beyond mere correctness.  RLBFF extracts principles that can be answered in a binary fashion (e.g. accuracy of information: yes, or code readability: no) from natural language feedback. Such principles can then be used to ground Reward Model training as an entailment task (response satisfies or does not satisfy an arbitrary principle). We show that Reward Models trained in this manner can outperform Bradley-Terry models when matched for data and achieve top performance on RM-Bench (86.2\%) and JudgeBench (81.4\%, \#1 on leaderboard as of September 24, 2025). Additionally, users can specify principles of interest at inference time to customize the focus of our reward models, in contrast to Bradley-Terry models. Finally, we present a fully open source recipe (including data) to align Qwen3-32B using RLBFF and our Reward Model, to match or exceed the performance of o3-mini and DeepSeek R1 on general alignment benchmarks of MT-Bench, WildBench, and Arena Hard v2 (at $<5$\% of the inference cost).

TL;DR: We present an approach to bridge RL with Human Feedback and Verifiable Rewards. Our method achieves #1 on JudgeBench leaderboard and exceeds or matches DeepSeek R1 and o3-mini on Arena Hard V2,WildBench and MT Bench at <5% of their inference cost.