Title: Seeing but Not Believing: Probing the Disconnect Between Visual Attention and Answer Correctness in VLMs
Primary area: foundation or frontier models, including LLMs
Keywords: Vision Language Model, Multi-modal QA, Mechanistic Interpretability

Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) achieve strong results on multimodal tasks such as visual question answering, yet they can still fail even when the correct visual evidence is present. In this work, we systematically investigate whether these failures arise from not perceiving the evidence or from not leveraging it effectively. By examining layer-wise attention dynamics, we find that shallow layers focus primarily on text, while deeper layers sparsely but reliably attend to localized evidence regions. Surprisingly, VLMs often perceive the visual evidence when outputting incorrect answers, a phenomenon we term "seeing but not believing" that widely exists in major VLM families. Building on this, we introduce an inference-time intervention that highlights deep-layer evidence regions through selective attention-based masking. It requires no training and consistently improves accuracy across multiple families, including LLaVA, Qwen, Gemma, and InternVL. These results show that VLMs encode reliable evidence internally but under-utilize it, and that making such signals explicit can bridge the gap between perception and reasoning, advancing the diagnostic understanding and reliability of VLMs.

TL;DR: We show that VLMs often perceive the right evidence but fail to use it, and propose a simple inference-time method that highlights evidence to improve accuracy.