Title: SurvHTE-Bench: A Benchmark for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation in Survival Analysis
Primary area: datasets and benchmarks
Keywords: Causal Inference, Survival Analysis, Treatment Effect, Datasets and Benchmarks

Abstract: Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs) from right-censored survival data is critical in high-stakes applications such as precision medicine and individualized policy-making. Yet, the survival analysis setting poses unique challenges for HTE estimation due to censoring, unobserved counterfactuals, and complex identification assumptions. Despite recent advances, from causal survival forests to survival meta-learners and outcome imputation approaches, evaluation practices remain fragmented and inconsistent. We introduce SurvHTE‐Bench, the first comprehensive benchmark for HTE estimation with censored outcomes. The benchmark spans (i) a modular suite of synthetic datasets with known ground truth, systematically varying causal assumptions and survival dynamics, (ii) semi-synthetic datasets that pair real-world covariates with simulated treatments and outcomes, and (iii) real-world datasets from a twin study (with known ground truth) and from an HIV clinical trial. Across synthetic, semi-synthetic, and real-world settings, we provide the first rigorous comparison of survival HTE methods under diverse conditions and realistic assumption violations. SurvHTE‐Bench establishes a foundation for fair, reproducible, and extensible evaluation of causal survival methods.

TL;DR: We present SurvHTE-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating methods that estimate heterogeneous treatment effects from censored survival data, enabling rigorous, fair, and reproducible comparison across diverse causal scenarios.