Title: Scalable Oversight via Partitioned Human Supervision
Primary area: foundation or frontier models, including LLMs
Keywords: LLM, scalable oversight, weak supervision, agentic systems

Abstract: As artificial intelligence (AI) systems approach and surpass expert human performance across a broad range of tasks, obtaining high-quality human supervision for evaluation and training becomes increasingly challenging.
Our focus is on tasks that require deep knowledge and skills of multiple domains. Unfortunately, even the best human experts are knowledgeable only in a single narrow area, and will not be able to evaluate the correctness of advanced AI systems on such superhuman tasks.
However, based on their narrow expertise, humans may provide a weak signal, i.e., a *complementary label* indicating an option that is incorrect. For example, a cardiologist could state that ``this is not related to cardiology,'' even if they cannot identify the true disease.
Based on this weak signal, we propose a scalable oversight framework that enables us to evaluate frontier AI systems without the need to prepare the ground truth.
We derive an *unbiased* estimator of top-1 accuracy from complementary labels and quantify how many complementary labels are needed to match the variance of ordinary labels. We further introduce two estimators to combine scarce ordinary labels with abundant complementary labels.
We provide finite-sample deviation guarantees for both complementary-only and the mixed estimators.
Empirically, we show that we can evaluate the output of large language models without the ground truth, if we have complementary labels.
We further show that we can train an AI system with such weak signals: we show how we can design an agentic AI system automatically that can perform better by these partitioned human supervision.