Title: From Misclassification to Outliers: Joint Reliability Assessment in Classification
Primary area: other topics in machine learning (i.e., none of the above)
Keywords: Method evaluation, OOD detection, Failure prediction, Selective classification

Abstract: Building reliable classifiers is a fundamental challenge for deploying machine learning in real-world applications. A reliable system should not only detect out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs but also anticipate in-distribution (ID) errors by assigning low confidence to potentially misclassified samples. Yet, most prior work treats OOD detection and failure prediction as separated problems, overlooking their closed connection. We argue that reliability requires evaluating them jointly. To this end, we propose a unified evaluation framework that integrates OOD detection and failure prediction, quantified by our new metrics DS-F1 and DS-AURC, where DS denotes double scoring functions. Experiments on the OpenOOD benchmark show that double scoring functions yield classifiers that are substantially more reliable than traditional single scoring approaches. Our analysis further reveals that OOD-based approaches provide notable gains under simple or far-OOD shifts, but only marginal benefits under more challenging near-OOD conditions. Beyond evaluation, we extend the reliable classifier SURE and introduce SURE+, a new approach that significantly improves reliability across diverse scenarios. Together, our framework, metrics, and method establish a new benchmark for trustworthy classification and offer practical guidance for deploying robust models in real-world settings. Code will be released upon publication.

TL;DR: We extend traditional single-metric evaluation methods, F1 and AURC, into novel dual-metric approaches called DS-F1 and DS-AURC that jointly assess OOD detection and failure prediction performance.