Title: LLMs Struggle to Balance Reasoning and World Knowledge in Causal Narrative Understanding
Primary area: foundation or frontier models, including LLMs
Keywords: Causal Inference, Large Language Models, Reasoning, Narratives

Abstract: The ability to robustly identify causal relationships is essential for autonomous decision-making and adaptation to novel scenarios. However, accurately inferring causal structure requires integrating both world knowledge and abstract logical reasoning. In this work, we investigate the interaction between these two capabilities through the representative task of causal reasoning over narratives. Through controlled synthetic, semi-synthetic and real-world experiments, we find that state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) often rely on superficial heuristics—for example, inferring causality from event order or recalling memorized world knowledge without attending to context. Furthermore, we show that simple reformulations of the task can elicit more robust reasoning behavior. Our evaluation spans a range of causal structures, from linear chains to complex graphs involving colliders and forks. These findings uncover systematic patterns in how LLMs perform causal reasoning and lay the groundwork for developing methods that better align LLM behavior with principled causal inference.

TL;DR: In this paper, we examine the failure Modes of LLMs for causal reasoning on narratives and the unreliable shortcuts LLMs take to make causal inferences.