Title: Reward Models are Metrics in a Trench Coat
Primary area: foundation or frontier models, including LLMs
Keywords: LLMs, Generation, Reward Model, Evaluation, Evaluation Metrics

Abstract: The emergence of reinforcement learning in post-training of large language models has sparked significant interest in reward models. 
Reward models assess the quality of sampled model outputs to generate training signals. This task is also performed by evaluation metrics that monitor the performance of an AI model. We find that the two research areas are mostly separate, leading to redundant terminology and repeated pitfalls. Common challenges include susceptibility to spurious correlations, impact on downstream reward hacking, methods to improve data quality, and approaches to meta-evaluation.
Our position paper argues that a closer collaboration between the fields can help overcome these issues. To that end, we show how metrics outperform reward models on specific tasks and provide an extensive survey of the two areas. Grounded in this survey, we point to multiple research topics in which closer alignment can improve reward models and metrics in areas such as preference elicitation methods, avoidance of spurious correlations and reward hacking, and calibration-aware meta-evaluation.

TL;DR: This paper argues that reward models and evaluation metrics are functionally equivalent, but have with separate research communities and best practices. We outline ways in which a closer collaboration can address shared pitfalls.