Title: Beyond Linear Probes: Dynamic Safety Monitoring for Language Models
Primary area: alignment, fairness, safety, privacy, and societal considerations
Keywords: Safety monitoring, Polynomial classifiers, Interpretability

Abstract: Monitoring large language models' (LLMs) activations is an effective way to detect harmful requests before they lead to unsafe outputs. However, traditional safety monitors often require the same amount of compute for every query. This creates a trade-off: expensive monitors waste resources on easy inputs, while cheap ones risk missing subtle cases. We argue that safety monitors should be flexible--costs should rise only when inputs are difficult to assess, or when more compute is available. To achieve this, we introduce Truncated Polynomial Classifiers (TPCs), a natural extension of linear probes for dynamic activation monitoring. Our key insight is that polynomials can be trained and evaluated progressively, term-by-term. At test-time, one can early-stop for lightweight monitoring, or use more terms for stronger guardrails when needed. TPCs provide two modes of use. First, as a safety dial: by evaluating more terms, developers and regulators can "buy" stronger guardrails from the same model. Second, as an adaptive cascade: clear cases exit early after low-order checks, and higher-order guardrails are evaluated only for ambiguous inputs, reducing overall monitoring costs. On two large-scale safety datasets (WildGuardMix and BeaverTails), for 4 models with up to 30B parameters, we show that  TPCs compete with or outperform MLP-based probe baselines of the same size,  all the while being more interpretable than their black-box counterparts. Our anonymous code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/tpc-anon-0708.

TL;DR: Polynomial classifiers give adaptive, interpretable safety guardrails for language models.