Title: ELEPHANT: Measuring and understanding social sycophancy in LLMs
Primary area: alignment, fairness, safety, privacy, and societal considerations
Keywords: large language models, sycophancy, affirmation, benchmark, social sycophancy

Abstract: LLMs are known to exhibit _sycophancy_: agreeing with and flattering users, even at the cost of correctness. Prior work measures sycophancy only as direct agreement with users' explicitly stated beliefs that can be compared to a ground truth. This fails to capture broader forms of sycophancy such as affirming a user's self-image or other implicit beliefs. To address this gap, we introduce **social sycophancy**, characterizing sycophancy as excessive preservation of a user’s _face_ (their desired self-image), and present **ELEPHANT**, a benchmark for measuring social sycophancy in an LLM. Applying our benchmark to 11 models, we show that LLMs consistently exhibit high rates of social sycophancy: on average, they preserve user's face 45 percentage points more than humans in general advice queries and in queries describing clear user wrongdoing (from Reddit's r/AmITheAsshole). Furthermore, when prompted with perspectives from either side of a moral conflict, LLMs affirm *whichever side the user adopts* in 48% of cases--telling both the at-fault party and the wronged party that they are not wrong--rather than adhering to a consistent moral or value judgment. We further show that social sycophancy is rewarded in preference datasets, and that while existing mitigation strategies for sycophancy are limited in effectiveness, model-based steering shows promise for mitigating these behaviors. Our work provides theoretical grounding and an empirical benchmark for understanding and addressing sycophancy in the open-ended contexts that characterize the vast majority of LLM use cases.

TL;DR: We present a new theory and framework for understanding and measuring social sycophancy, enabling measuring broader forms of sycophancy that occur in everyday LLM use contexts, and we also empirically examine causes and mitigations.