Title: Diversity-Enhanced Reasoning for Subjective Questions
Primary area: alignment, fairness, safety, privacy, and societal considerations
Keywords: LLM, subjective reasoning, diversity-enhanced training

Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) with long chain-of-thought capabilities, optimized via reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), excel at **objective reasoning** tasks like mathematical problem solving and code generation.
However, RLVR is known for degrading generation diversity, which causes LRMs to fall short on **subjective reasoning** that has multiple answers depending on different role perspectives.
While recent studies recognize the importance of diversity-enhanced training in objective reasoning, limited attention has been given to subjective tasks.
In this paper, we find that subjective reasoning can be improved by introducing perspective diversity and token-level diversity, with the former one providing a coherent scaffolding anchored to a real-world stakeholder group and the latter one broadening the answer search space.
We propose MultiRole-R1, a diversity-enhanced training framework featuring an unsupervised data construction pipeline that synthesizes reasoning chains incorporating various role perspectives.
It also employs reinforcement learning via Group Relative Policy Optimization with reward shaping, taking diversity as a reward signal in addition to verifiable reward.
Training on subjective tasks solely, MultiRole-R1 increases the in-domain and out-of-domain accuracy by 14.1% and 7.64%, and even enhances the performance on advanced math reasoning such as AIME 2024.
We further show that diversity is a more consistent indicator of accuracy than reasoning length.