Title: LEXam: Benchmarking Legal Reasoning on 340 Law Exams
Primary area: datasets and benchmarks
Keywords: LLM, legal reasoning, long-form, multiple-choice, question answering

Abstract: Long-form legal reasoning remains a key challenge for large language models (LLMs) in spite of recent advances in test-time scaling. To address this, we introduce ***LEXam***, a novel benchmark derived from 340 law exams spanning 116 law school courses across a range of subjects and degree levels. The dataset comprises 4,886 law exam questions in English and German, including 2,841 long-form, open-ended questions and 2,045 multiple-choice questions. Besides reference answers, the open questions are also accompanied by explicit guidance outlining the expected legal reasoning approach such as issue spotting, rule recall, or rule application. Our evaluation on both open-ended and multiple-choice questions present significant challenges for current LLMs; in particular, they notably struggle with open questions that require structured, multi-step legal reasoning. Moreover, our results underscore the effectiveness of the dataset in differentiating between models with varying capabilities. Deploying an ensemble LLM-as-a-Judge paradigm with rigorous human expert validation, we demonstrate how model-generated reasoning steps can be evaluated consistently and accurately, closely aligning with human expert assessments. Our evaluation setup provides a scalable method to assess legal reasoning quality beyond simple accuracy metrics. Anonymous repository: [this URL](https://anonymous.4open.science/r/LEXam-anonymous-12EB).

TL;DR: We introduce LEXam, a comprehensive benchmark derived from real law exams, highlighting substantial challenges for LLMs in structured legal reasoning tasks and providing a scalable evaluation method beyond simple accuracy metrics.