Title: Towards Understanding Valuable Preference Data for Large Language Model Alignment
Primary area: foundation or frontier models, including LLMs
Keywords: Large language model alignment, preference data, influence function

Abstract: Large language model (LLM) alignment is typically achieved through learning from human preference comparisons, making the quality of preference data critical to its success. Existing studies often pre-process raw training datasets to identify valuable preference pairs using external reward models or off-the-shelf LLMs, achieving improved overall performance but rarely examining whether individual, selected data point is genuinely beneficial. We assess data quality through individual influence on validation data using our newly proposed truncated influence function (TIF), which mitigates the over-scoring present in traditional measures and reveals that preference data quality is inherently a property of the model. In other words, a data pair that benefits one model may harm another. This leaves the need to improve the preference data selection approaches to be adapting to specific models. To this end, we introduce a set of candidate scoring functions (SFs) that are computationally simpler than TIF and positively correlated with it. These functions are also model dependent and can serve as potential indicators of individual data quality for preference data selection. Furthermore, we observe that these SFs inherently exhibit errors when compared to TIF. To this end, we combine them to offset their diverse error sources, resulting in a simple yet effective data selection rule that enables the models to achieve a more precise selection of valuable preference data. We conduct experiments across diverse alignment benchmarks and various LLM families, with results demonstrating that better alignment performance can be achieved using less data, showing the generality and robustness of our findings and new methods.

TL;DR: We assess preference data quality through our newly proposed truncated influence function (TIF), and then we propose a set of candidate scoring functions that are positive correlated with TIF to select valuable preference data.