Comparison of Using a Video vs. a Text to Improve Secure Communication During a Crisis in Anesthesia
NCT Number: NCT06473090
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
Phases: NA
Conditions: Simulation|Education|Communication
Interventions: OTHER: Video group|OTHER: Text group
Sponsor: Université Paris-Sud
Sex: ALL
Age: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Enrollment: 80
Study Design: Allocation: RANDOMIZED|Intervention Model: PARALLEL|Masking: SINGLE (OUTCOMES_ASSESSOR)|Primary Purpose: OTHER
Start Date: 2024-06-26
Completion Date: 2025-08-01

Summary:
Poor team communication in the OR is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Thus, experts recommend that the healthcare team in a crisis situation use secure and standardized communication to improve the quality and safety of care. Secure and standardized communication involves clear, concise, and unambiguous language. Methods of secure communication include closed-loop communication (CLC), precise and complete communication (direct, full dosage), and the use of the SBAR tool. To improve healthcare professionals' communication, it is essential to use effective educational tools. Traditionally, lectures or reading articles were the standard methods. The use of video as a tool for knowledge and skills transfer seems promising. The objective is to compare the learning of secure communication in crisis situations in anesthesia after using two different educational supports: a text versus an educational video.

A prospective, multicenter, controlled, and randomized study will be conducted during high-fidelity simulation sessions in anesthesia, comparing a group using a text-type educational support versus a group using an educational video. It will take place in simulation centers. Voluntary participants will be anesthesia and critical care residents and/or nurse anesthetists who have used one of the educational supports and then actively participated in the simulation scenarios. After their consent, participants will be randomized into two groups:

* Text group: Participants will read a text-type educational support for 15 minutes at the beginning of the session before their involvement in 2 high-fidelity crisis simulation scenarios.
* Video group: Participants will watch a 15-minute educational video at the beginning of the session before their involvement in the 2 high-fidelity simulation scenarios.

The primary endpoint will be to compare the total number of correct secure communication events during the crisis between the 2 groups, which includes: a) Number of correctly performed SBAR b) Number of correctly or partially performed closed-loop communications (CLC) c) Number of directive verbal orders d) Number of correct medication dosages. This evaluation will be based on video recordings of the 2 scenarios assessed by 2 independent, blinded experts (external evaluation of a team's secure communication skills (Kirkpatrick level 2). This composite score is based on various secure communication methods described in the literature and recommended by experts. The number of verbal orders per scenario will also be recorded.

The secondary endpoint will be to evaluate each item independently, the proportion of CLC per verbal order, satisfaction with the educational tool (Kirkpatrick level 1), and the perception of learning in terms of secure communication (1 to 10 Likert scale, Kirkpatrick level 2). Participants' characteristics will also be collected.

Primary Outcome Measures: communication events, The primary endpoint will be to compare the total number of correct secure communication events during the crisis between the 2 groups, which includes: a) Number of correctly performed SBAR (1 correct event = 1 point) b) Number of correctly or partially performed closed-loop communications (CLC) (1 correct event = 1 point, partial = ½ point) c) Number of directive verbal orders (using a name or the pronoun "you") (1 correct event = 1 point) d) Number of correct medication dosages (medication with route of administration and dosage) (1 correct event = 1 point). This evaluation will be based on video recordings of the 2 scenarios assessed by 2 independent, blinded experts. This composite score is based on various secure communication methods described in the literature and recommended by experts (1). It corresponds to an external evaluation of a team's secure communication skills (Kirkpatrick level 2)., 30 minutes by video after the end of the session by an external evaluator
Secondary Outcome Measures: Satisfaction, to evaluate satisfaction with the educational tool ((rated between 1 to 10 on a Likert scale, Kirkpatrick level 1), 1 minute and the end of the session by all residents|perception of learning, the perception of learning in terms of secure communication (rated between 1 to 10 on a Likert scale, Kirkpatrick level 2)., 1 minute and the end of the session by all residents|Closed-loop-communication, to evaluate the proportion of Closed loop communication per verbal order., 30 minutes by video after the end of the session by an external evaluator|SBAR (situation, background, assessment, recommandation) tool, to evaluate Number of correctly performed SBAR tool (1 correct event = 1 point), 30 minutes by video after the end of the session by an external evaluator|closed-loop communication, to evaluate Number of correctly or partially performed closed-loop communications ( correct event = 1 point, partial = ½ point), 30 minutes by video after the end of the session by an external evaluator|verbal orders, to evaluate Number of directive verbal orders (using a name or the pronoun "you") (1 correct event = 1 point), 30 minutes by video after the end of the session by an external evaluator|medication dosages, d) Number of correct medication dosages (medication with route of administration and dosage) (1 correct event = 1 point)., 30 minutes by video after the end of the session by an external evaluator