Classic vs. High-Fat Intermittent Fasting Effects
NCT Number: NCT06515639
Status: COMPLETED
Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
Phases: NA
Conditions: Obesity
Interventions: OTHER: Diet therapy for Classic IF diet group|OTHER: Diet therapy for low carb-High fat IF diet group
Sponsor: Istanbul Bilgi University
Sex: FEMALE
Age: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Enrollment: 44
Study Design: Allocation: RANDOMIZED|Intervention Model: PARALLEL|Masking: SINGLE (PARTICIPANT)|Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
Start Date: 2024-02-01
Completion Date: 2024-05-15
Locations: Gebze Municipality Family Counseling Center, Istanbul, 41400, Turkey

Summary:
Poor eating habits contribute to weight gain and obesity, leading to numerous metabolic issues such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. The treatment of obesity involves lifestyle interventions that include dietary and nutritional modifications, physical activity, and behavioral therapy. Literature supports both carbohydrate and fat restriction in the treatment of obesity. In low-carbohydrate diets, less than 40% of energy is sourced from carbohydrates.Besides the dietary model, individual eating behavior can also influence the diet's outcomes. There is a significant relationship between eating behavior and food choices. Given that food choices can impact diet satisfaction, evaluating eating behavior is important when assessing dietary compliance.The literature includes studies demonstrating the effects of a classic intermittent fasting diet. However, no studies have compared the potential effects of intermittent fasting models based on the macronutrient distribution within their content. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effects of high-fat, low-carbohydrate intermittent fasting versus classical intermittent fasting on body composition, eating behavior, and diet satisfaction.

Primary Outcome Measures: Body composition, measurements of total body weight, six weeks|Body composition, measurements of body mass index (BMI), six weeks|Body composition, measurements of fat mass, six weeks|Body composition, measurements of muscle mass, six weeks|Body composition, measurements of fat percentage, six weeks|diet satisfaction, A number of questions are necessary for clinicians to evaluate their patients' or clients' diet satisfaction, as well as their compliance with the diet, based on their responses. The Diet Satisfaction Scale is designed to assess satisfaction with various aspects of any diet, such as hunger levels, desire to eat, food preparation, enjoyment, ease of adherence at home and away, food variety, budget compatibility, contribution to physical health, and sustainability. The scale was developed by Jospe et al, and its Turkish validity and reliability were established by Eskici and Yilmaz. It consists of 9 items with 5-point Likert-type response options ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Notably, the first item is reverse-scored (1=5, 2=4, 3=3, 4=2, and 5=1)., six weeks|behavioral and cognitive components of eating, The Three-Factor Eating Scale, used to measure the behavioral and cognitive components of eating, was developed by Cappelleri and colleagues. Its validity and reliability in Turkish were established by Karakus et al. The questionnaire comprises three factors: Uncontrolled Eating (UE), Cognitive Restraint (CR), and Emotional Eating (EE). Uncontrolled Eating (UE) refers to losing control over eating due to hunger or external stimuli and includes 9 items, with scores ranging from 9 to 36. Cognitive Restraint (CR) refers to the conscious restriction of food intake to control body shape and weight, encompassing 6 items, with scores ranging from 6 to 24. Emotional Eating (EE) examines overeating in response to negative emotional states such as anger, sadness, or stress, and includes 6 items, with scores ranging from 6 to 24. A higher score in any sub-factor indicates a greater dominance of the corresponding eating behavior., six weeks