Investigation of Fluorescent Concretization Intervention on Intensive Care Nurses' Hand Hygiene Training
NCT Number: NCT06572176
Status: COMPLETED
Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
Phases: NA
Conditions: Hand|Health Care Associated Infection|Training Group, Sensitivity
Interventions: BEHAVIORAL: With fluorescent concretization group
Sponsor: Uludag University
Sex: ALL
Age: ADULT, OLDER_ADULT
Enrollment: 76
Study Design: Allocation: RANDOMIZED|Intervention Model: PARALLEL|Masking: NONE|Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Start Date: 2021-07-17
Completion Date: 2022-10-10
Locations: Bursa Uludag University Health Sciences Faculty of the Nursing Department, Nilüfer, Bursa, 16059, Turkey

Summary:
Aim: The primary objective was to assess the effect of fluorescent concretization intervention on intensive care nurses' hand-washing efficiency, skill performance, and duration scores during the training process. A secondary objective was to investigate the intensive care nurses to determine their level of hand hygiene knowledge before and after the training.

Design: Cluster-randomised controlled pretest-posttest and follow-up research design was used.

Methods: This study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in XX province, Türkiye. Seventy-six nurses from intensive care units participated in hand hygiene training. In addition to routine hand hygiene training, the participants in the intervention group (n=39) had their hand washing efficiency evaluated using ultraviolet A light. The dirty spots were shown to the participants, and the reasons were discussed. The participants in the control group (n=37) received hand washing training without fluorescent concretization and ultraviolet light intervention. The Hand Hygiene theoretical information is an evidence-based workplace intervention delivered by trained facilitators across two training. Hand Hygiene Information Forms were administered upon registration and before randomisation of all participants immediately after the final training. Two independent researchers observed Hand Washing Skill Checklist and Efficacy forms in three follow-ups (before training, 15 days after training, and four months after training).

Primary Outcome Measures: Hand Washing Skill Efficacy (HWSE), The hands were examined in seven areas: the palm, the back of the hand, and between the fingers, specifically the thumb, fingertips, nails, the anterior side of the wrist, and the posterior side. Under the UV light, dirty spots were marked separately for the right and left hands. The dirty spot was calculated as 1 point, and the clean spot was calculated as 0 points. 0-3-point range was considered clean; 4-7 point range was considered dirty (Škodová et al., 2015). ICC coefficient was 0.98 for the right HWSE before training, 1.0 after 15 days, and 1.0 at four months after training. The ICC coefficient was 0.96 for the left HWSE before training, 1.0 at 15 days after training, and 1.0 at four months after training. Two independent researchers completed this form in three repeated follow-ups., through study completion, an average 1 year
Secondary Outcome Measures: Hand Hygiene Information Form (HHIF), The form was prepared in line with the literature to determine participants' socio-demographic characteristics and knowledge of hand hygiene. In line with the training content, the items in the information form consisted of the history of hand hygiene, transmission of microorganisms, bacterial flora, glove use, surgical hand washing and scrubbing, hand hygiene products, hand hygiene compliance, and HAIs. The HHIF items created by the research team were presented to experts (n=10), including an assessment and measurement expert. As a result of expert evaluations, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated as 1.0. Items with low CVI were excluded. Then, "HHIF" and "Hand Hygiene Training Guide for Intensive Care Nurses" were finalized after the pilot application with five intensive care nurses outside the study group. The form consisted of 19 items on HH topics. The lowest and highest scores that can be obtained from the form were 0 and 100, respectively., through study completion, an average 1 year