FIFTH SECTION     CASE OF KONONOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 11770/03 and 89 other applications)          JUDGMENT  STRASBOURG 6 June 2013   This judgment is final. It may be subject to editorial revision.In the case of Kononova and Others v. Ukraine,The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Boštjan M. Zupančič, President, Ann Power-Forde, Helena Jäderblom, judges,and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar,Having deliberated in private on 14 May 2013,Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:PROCEDURE1.  The case originated in 90 applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Ukrainian nationals, one Russian national (application no. 56464/07) and companies based in Ukraine. Their details are specified in the appended tables (“the applicants”).2.  In applications nos. 35771/07, 28061/08, 28071/08, 46953/08, 25260/09, 26397/09, 20032/10, 22620/10, 25288/10 the applicants died in course of the proceedings before the Court. Their next-of-kin expressed a wish to pursue the applications.3.  Mr Andriy Salnikov (application no. 28061/08) and Ms Diana Salnikova (application no. 28071/08) are brother and sister. They are both heirs of their deceased father and challenge the lengthy non-enforcement of the same judgment adopted in favour of their father.4.  The Government are represented by their Agent, Mr Nazar Kulchytskyy.5.  The applications listed in Appendices 1 and 2 were communicated to the Government on various dates in 2003-2011.6.  The Russian Government, having been informed of their right to intervene in the proceedings in respect of the applicant in application no. 56464/07 (Article 36 § 1 of the Convention and Rule 44 of the Rules of Court), indicated that they did not wish to exercise that right.THE FACTSTHE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE7.  On the dates set out in the appended tables domestic courts and labour disputes commissions delivered decisions according to which the applicants were entitled to various pecuniary amounts or to have certain actions taken in their favour. The decisions became enforceable. However, the applicants were unable to obtain the enforcement of the decisions in due time.8.  Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues.THE LAWI.  JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS9.  In view of the similarity of the applications in terms of the principal legal issues raised, the Court finds it appropriate to join them.II.  THE SECOND APPLICANT IN APPLICATION No. 47387/0610.  The second applicant in application no. 47387/06, Ms Lyubov Rusanova, complains about delay in payment of the salary caused by her former employer (State agency) and about the outcome of the proceedings before the domestic courts. The applicant has however failed to establish that any salary was outstanding, and has in any event failed to show that she appealed against the sole decision in the Court’s file. The Court finds that this part of application no. 47387/06 must be rejected as inadmissible in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.III.  THE STANDING OF THE APPLICANTS IN APPLICATIONS Nos. 35771/07, 28061/08, 28071/08, 46953/08, 25260/09, 26397/09, 20032/10, 22620/10, 25288/1011.  The Court considers that in applications listed in paragraph 2 (see above) the next-of-kin of the deceased applicants have standing to continue the proceedings in their stead (see, among other authorities, Mironov v. Ukraine, no. 19916/04, § 12, 14 December 2006).IV.  ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 6 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 112.  The applicants complained about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of the effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints. Expressly or in substance they relied on Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.13.  The Court notes that the above complaints (see paragraph 12 above) are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible.14.  The Court finds that the decisions in the applicants’ favour were not enforced in due time, for which the State authorities were responsible.15.  Having regard to its well-established case-law on the subject (see Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine, no. 40450/04, §§ 56-58 and 66-70, 15 October 2009) the Court finds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the prolonged non-enforcement of the decisions in the applicants’ favour. It also considers that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention in that the applicants did not have an effective domestic remedy to redress the damage created by such non-enforcement.V.  OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION16.  Some of the applicants raised other complaints under the Convention which the Court has carefully examined. In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court finds that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols.17.  It follows that those complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.VI.  APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION18.  Article 41 of the Convention provides:“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”19.  Bearing in mind its previous decisions on the matter (see Kharuk and Others v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 703/05 and 115 other applications, § 25, 26 July 2012), the Court considers it reasonable and equitable to award 3,000 euros (EUR) to each applicant in the applications which concern non‑enforcement delays exceeding three years (the applications tabulated in Appendix 1 with the exception of applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08) and EUR 1,500 to each applicant in the other applications (the applications tabulated in Appendix 2 and applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08). These sums are to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, as well as costs and expenses.20.  The Court finds that the applicants in applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08 are to be awarded 1,500 euros (EUR) each, as, being heirs to their deceased father’s estate in equal parts, they both challenge the non‑enforcement of the same judgment adopted in favour of their late father (see § 3 above).21.  The Court considers that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to enforce the judgments which remain enforceable.22.  The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.23.  The Court finally recalls that in the case of Kharuk it reiterated that it is an international judicial authority contingent on the consent of the States signatory to the Convention, that its principal task is to secure respect for human rights, rather than compensate applicants’ losses minutely and exhaustively, and that in cases involving many similarly situated victims a unified approach may be called for (see Kharuk v. Ukraine cited above, §§ 23, 24).24.  The Court considers that still further standardisation of awards in these cases is called for, and intends, in future judgments dealing with standard non-enforcement complaints against Ukraine, to award a single lump sum to each applicant, regardless of the non-enforcement period involved.FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY1.  Decides to join the applications; 2.  Declares application no. 47387/06 inadmissible insofar as it is made by Ms Lyubov Rusanova; 3.  Declares the complaints of the applicants under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints admissible and the remainder of the applications inadmissible; 4.  Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1; 5.  Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention; 6.  Holds(a)  that the respondent State is to enforce the domestic decisions in the applicants’ favour which remain enforceable, and is to pay, within three months, EUR 3,000 (three thousand euros) to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications tabulated in Appendix 1 (with the exception of applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08) and EUR 1,500 (one thousand five hundred euros)(i)  to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications tabulated in Appendix 2 and(ii)  in applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants on the above amounts which are to be converted into the national currency at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.Done in English, and notified in writing on 6 June 2013, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. Stephen Phillips Boštjan M. Zupančič Deputy Registrar PresidentAPPENDIX 1(non-enforcement delays three years and more) No.Application no. and date of introductionApplicants’ name and date of birthRelevant domestic decisions  11770/0328/03/2003Svetlana Sergeyevna KONONOVA04/04/1957Suvorosvkyy District Court of Kherson, 06/06/2003 as amended by the Kherson Regional Court of Appeal, 11/02/2004  17953/0506/05/2005Nikolay Ivanovich DOVGALYOV19/09/1957Tsentralno-Miskyy District Court of Makiyivka, 12/08/2003, as amended by the Donetsk Regional Court of Appeal on 04/12/2003  26918/0506/07/2005Nonna Igorevna PORTNOVA27/12/1950Commercial Court of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, 12/12/2002  18448/0625/04/2006PARITET LTD, TOV VKPKyiv Commercial Court, 19/02/2002  18673/0622/04/2006Valeriy Viktorovych SYNELNYKOV25/07/19681) Romny Court, 20/01/2005 2) Romby Court, 21/11/2006  20933/0613/05/2006Lyudmila Fyodorovna BOBROVA12/05/1963Nova Kakhovka Court, 27/09/2005  34409/0612/07/2006Vasiliy Aleksandrovich TERNOVIK18/01/1960Novogrodivka Court, 21/12/1999  34596/0602/08/2006Stanislav Ivanovych PRUDKYY30/05/19631) Military Court of Kyiv the Garrison, 09/09/1999 2) Bila Tserkva Court, 24/06/2005  41295/0604/10/2006Lyudmyla Viktorivna BURYAN10/10/1939Berdychiv Court, 18/12/2003 47358/0618/11/2006Olena Yevgeniyivna LYOVOCHKINA26/09/1959Zavodskyy District Court of Mykolayiv, 05/06/2001, having regard to the bailiffs’ misconduct as acknowledged by the Mykolayiv Regional Court of Appeal on 01/02/2006 47387/0607/11/2006Yelena Yevgenyevna GRYUNER23/09/1958 Lyubov Aleksandrovna RUSANOVA09/12/1948Lenynskyy District Court of Zaporyzhzhya, 28/09/1999, rendered in respect of the first applicant 9229/0706/02/2007Olena Mykhaylivna PIKUSH20/05/1941Petrykivskyy District Court of the Dnipropetrovsk Region, 09/04/1996, having regard to the bailiffs’ misconduct as acknowledged by the same court on 08/06/2005 9356/0712/02/2007Mykola Yevgenovych TATARENKO08/11/19591) Berezneguvate, 13/12/2005 2) Berezneguvate, 10/11/2006 3) Berezneguvate, 16/03/2007 19149/0720/04/2007Mykola Petrovych POPOV30/11/19291) Berdychiv Court, 15/09/2006 2) Berdychiv Court, 28/09/2006 22887/0711/05/2007Mariya Fedorivna ODNOKOPYLA22/06/1942Podilskyy District Court of Kyiv, 17/04/2002 24362/0726/05/2007Irina Yuryevna TIMOFEYEVA13/01/19591) Nova Kakhovka Court, 25/10/2004 2) Nova Kakhovka Court, 02/02/2005 25143/0729/05/2007Viktor Feofanovich ZATURINSKIY08/04/19481) Labour Disputes Commission of the "Yuzhnyy Elektromashynostroitelnyy Zavod" OJSC, 11/11/1999 2) Nova Kakhovka Court, 02/03/2007 3) Nova Kakhovka Court, 15/05/2007 26676/0715/06/2007KONEKS LTD, TOV22/08/1956Kharkiv Regional Commercial Court, 07/12/2005 31465/0723/06/2007Yakiv Mykhaylovych GORDIY17/01/19451) Kosiv Court, 30/01/2006 2) Kosiv Court, 04/09/2003 34772/0711/07/2007Vasiliy Nikolayevich KOVALENKO16/03/1969 Boris Nikolayevich ADAMOVICH19/10/1958 Tatyana Vasilyevna BRUSLINOVSKAYA13/02/1961 Anna Ivanovna DANILENKO28/01/1947 Yekaterina Nikolayevna DANILENKO06/12/1983 Antonina Nikolayevna KRAYNYAYA15/11/1951 Natalya Mikhaylovna KULAYEVA20/08/1957Applicant 1:1) Krasnyy Luch Court, 13/11/20022) Krasnyy Luch Court, 01/06/2005 Applicant 2:3) Krasnyy Luch Court, 27/09/20024) Krasnyy Luch Court, 06/06/2005 Applicant 3:5) Krasnyy Luch Court, 31/07/20026) Krasnyy Luch Court, 16/05/2005 Applicant 4:7) Krasnyy Luch Court, 18/05/2005 Applicant 5:8) Krasnyy Luch Court, 18/05/2005 Applicant 6:9) Krasnyy Luch Court, 03/01/200310) Krasnyy Luch Town Court, 18/07/2005 Applicant 7:11) Krasnyy Luch Court, 09/12/200312) Krasnyy Luch Court, 07/06/2005 35771/0720/07/2007Lyudmila Pavlovna TOLSTOKOROVA27/01/19371) Nova Kakhovka Court, 25/10/2004 2) Nova Kakhovka Court, 23/02/2005 35858/0706/08/2007Andrey Viktorovich MALTYZ15/08/1972Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal, 25/02/2008 40767/0707/08/2007Nina Petrovna PAVLENKO26/02/1946Pervomayskyy Court, 12/12/2005 44386/0708/08/2006Vitaliy Grygorovych PASYOVIN18/07/1957Bila Tserkva Court, 30/09/2005 51922/0708/11/2007Vladimir Dmitriyevich PUZENKO15/01/1960Crimea Court of Appeal, 17/04/2007 52743/0712/11/2007Marina Nikolayevna ISAYEVA09/08/19641) Kyivskyy District Court of Odesa, 29/05/2003 2) Kyivskyy District Court of Odesa, 18/05/2006 56464/0715/11/2007Aleksandr Ivanovich KOLOSOV26/03/1954Krasnyy Luch Court, 23/03/1998 1865/0815/12/2007Nikolay Grigoryevich SHEVYCH18/10/1952Sverdlovsk Court, 27/05/2004 15601/0821/03/2008Aksentiy Platonovich DMITRASHEK31/08/19401) Kirovske Cour (Donetsk Region), 31/05/2005 2) Kirovske Cour (Donetsk Region), 13/06/2005 3) Kirovske Cour (Donetsk Region), case no. 2‑533, 01/06/2006 4) Kirovske Cour (Donetsk Region), case no. 2‑534, 01/06/2006 20775/0817/04/2008Kateryna Fedorivna FESENKO02/04/1949Kyivskyy District Court of Poltava, 31/07/2002 27288/0822/05/2008Viktor Aleksandrovich MIKHAYLOV31/05/19731) Krasnyy Luch Court, 22/06/2007 2) Krasnyy Luch Court, 28/09/2007 28061/0805/06/2008Andriy Sergiyovych SALNIKOV24/12/1985Military Court of the Kyiv Harrison, 27/02/2002 28071/0805/06/2008Diana Sergiyivna SALNIKOVA05/02/1987Military Court of the Kyiv Harrison, 27/02/2002 28090/0816/05/2008Andriy Mykhaylovych DANILOV14/12/1966Irpin Court, 23/11/2006 32466/0812/06/2008NAK, TOVKyivskyy District Court of Poltava, 16/03/2006 37355/0828/07/2008Oleksandr Volodymyrovych PECHONCHYK01/07/1966Volodymyretskyy District Court of Rivne Region, 16/07/2002 as modified by the same court on 26/06/2008 (in light of the judgments of the same court dated 05/06/2007 and of the Lviv Administrative Court of Appeal dated 11/09/2008) 46953/0822/09/2008Valentina Mikhaylovna MELNIKOVA25/05/1931Balaklavskyy District Court of Sevastopol, 23/06/2008 50872/0819/09/2008Ganna Oleksiyivna SITARUK06/08/1926Slavuta Court, 05/12/2002 61421/0803/12/2008Yevgeniya Trokhymivna GUTSOL18/11/19371) Bershad Court, 27/04/2007 2) Vinnytsya Circuit Administrative Court, 15/09/2008 12892/0919/02/2009Anatoliy Grygoriyovych ARTYUKH30/10/1948Mukachevo Court, 12/03/2007, quashed in the light of newly discovered evidence by the Mukachevo Court on 24/12/2010  25260/0921/04/2009Vasyl Yukhymovych LEGKYY11/11/1932Tetiyiv Court, 19/11/2007 26397/0904/03/2009Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich MATSEGORA19/04/1958Slovyansk Court, 13/03/2000 32372/0919/05/2009Galina Vasilyevna OLENICH01/08/19451) Slovyansk Court, 15/03/2002 2) Slovyansk Court, 12/04/2002 3) Slovyansk Court, 04/06/2003 33588/0911/06/2009Valeriy Fedorovych KRASYUK13/09/1948Chervonograd Court, 13/06/2005 38444/0901/07/2009Nadiya Mykolayivna MELNYCHUK10/02/19581) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005 2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007, Quashed By the Higher Administrative Court on 19/07/2011 3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007 44965/0906/08/2009Fekla Antonovna MUKHINA20/12/1923Antratsyt Court, 28/09/2006 46337/0916/08/2009ADEPT, PPSevastopol Commercial Court of Appeal, 28/11/2005, quashed by the Sevastopol Commercial Court of Appeal on 21/06/2010 53257/0925/09/2009Igor Viktorovych FEDOTOV30/01/1964Desnyanskyy District Court of Kyiv, 24/04/2008  54385/0902/10/2009Taisiya Kostyantynivna TATARETS06/11/1940Zavodskyy District Court of Dniprodzerzhynsk, 10/05/2006, as amended by the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Court of Appeal on 13/07/2006 and by the Supreme Court of Ukraine on 25/12/2008 54564/0901/10/2009Oleksandr Fedorovych SERDYUK26/04/19621) Avtozavodskyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 04/09/2008 2) Avtozavodskyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 01/10/2008 54594/0929/09/2009Dmytro Grygorovych KAMENSKYY11/05/1983Pervomayskyy Court, 06/09/2007 as amended by the Kharkiv Regional Court of Appeal on 09/10/2007 59199/0920/10/2009Anatoliy Ivanovich RASKHODOV24/06/1952Labour Disputes Commission of the Lisychanskyy Zavod GTV , 14/06/2001 65102/0927/11/2009Vladimir Anatolyevich SENIK27/01/1971Kupyansk Court, 30/11/2001 67309/0911/12/2009Taras Yosyfovych GENTOSH Drogobych Court, 29/12/2008 9993/1004/02/2010Vyacheslav Pavlovych OVCHYNNIKOV27/07/1943Mukachevo Court, 13/11/2006 11325/1016/02/2010Larysa Mykolayivna RYBALKO26/03/1958 Yevgen Opanasovych RYBALKO18/03/1955Denys Yevgenovych RYBALKO29/08/1981 Dmytro Yevgenovych RYBALKO29/08/1981Chervonozavodskyy District Court of Kharkiv, 22/11/2005 11826/1011/02/2010Galyna Oleksandrivna TARANENKO30/03/19511) Pervomayskyy Court, 25/12/2007 2) Pervomayskyy Court, 26/02/2008 11976/1016/02/2010Anatoliy Danilovich MATVIYENKO23/05/19431) Lugansk Circuit Administrative Court, 07/07/2009 as amended by the Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal on 25/11/2009 2) Artemivskyy District Court of Lugansk, 08/02/2008 as amended by the Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal on 12/06/2008 13482/1022/02/2010Aleksandr Vasilyevich MOROZOV02/03/19581) Krasnyy Luch Court, 23/09/2008 as amended by the Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal, 10/12/2008 2) Krasnyy Luch Court, 03/09/2009 as amended by the Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal, 10/02/2010 15301/1024/02/2010Oleksandr Mykolayovych SAFONOV19/03/1947 Valeriy Ivanovych MEDVEDEV29/07/1946 Valentyn Fedorovych STOROZHENKO07/09/1946 Stanislav Stanislavovych KUSHTAN28/06/1941 Oleksandr Arsentyovych LISNENKO06/12/1947 Sergiy Oleksandrovych ZAGLUSHCHENKO08/06/1955Applicant 1:Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 27/01/2009 (two judgments on the same day: 2a-3/09 and 2a‑4/09); Applicant 2:Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, February 2009 (enforcement proceedings no. 11946771, enforcement writ no. 2a-64 issued on 16/02/2009); Applicant 3:Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 16/02/2009; Applicant 4:Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 12/02/2009; Applicant 5:Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 08/12/2008 as amended by the Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal, 04/03/2009; Applicant 6:Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 28/01/2009 16144/1003/03/2010REAGENT, TOV09/06/1989Khmenlytskyy Regional Commercial Court, 14/07/2004 16644/1009/03/2010Vitaliy Vitalyevich DYACHKIN14/08/1976Tsentralno-Miskyy District Court of Gorlivka, 05/06/2009 17363/1016/03/2010Volodymyr Yuriyovych SIKAN21/08/1968Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 11/09/2007 17369/1015/03/2010Irina Mikhaylovna ROMANOVA01/12/1957Krasnyy Luch Court, 05/05/2004 17477/1019/03/2010Nadezhda Nikolayevna PALADIY22/10/19521) Kerch Court, 06/08/2004 2) Kerch Court, 24/11/2004 17674/1020/03/2010Mykola Dmytrovych GRECHANYY21/04/1949Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 14/10/2008 20032/1017/03/2010Georgiy Ivanovych BILOUS24/04/1926Avtozavodsyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 26/06/2008 22620/1025/03/2010Petr Kuzmich KOVALENKO11/07/19291) Kharkiv Regional Administrative Court, 17/11/2008 2) Balakliya Court, 20/07/2009  25360/1023/04/2010Vitaliy Gennadiyovych PANKOV06/10/1972Krasnyy Lyman Court, 24/11/2003 25363/1023/04/2010Ryta Vitaliyivna ADAMOVSKA10/06/1967Krasnyy Lyman Court, 24/11/2003 26232/1020/04/2010Mariya Ivanivna ARTYUKHOVA21/08/1937Velykyy Burluk Court,13/03/2008 26676/1002/04/2010Nikolay Nikolayevich YUKHIMENKO17/09/1942Court of Appeal of the Crimea, 30/09/2008 28834/1017/04/2010Grigoriy Vasilyevich ALFEROV27/04/1960Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 13/04/2009 29205/1012/05/2010Vladimir Stepanovich ANTOSHCHUK15/04/19501) Torez Court, 27/11/2000 2) Torez Court, 07/12/2007 30803/1017/05/2010Nataliya Mykolayivna SAVCHENKO12/01/1960Darnytskyy District Court of Kyiv, 29/03/2008 42600/1019/07/2010Antonina Nikolayevna KOSHELEVSKAYA03/04/1962 Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich KOSHELEVSKIY03/06/1987Simferopol District Court of the Crimea, 13/04/2001 51950/1015/07/2010Vita Grygorivna NIKITCHENKO25/04/19831) Kharkiv Regional Commercial Court, 24/12/2008 2) Kharkiv Regional Commercial Court, 13/07/2009 65624/1028/10/2010Vladimir Aleksandrovich BORISOV06/02/1958Krasnyy Luch Court, 09/02/2007 66602/1028/10/2010Anatoliy Ivanovych ZHUK12/06/1966Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 07/06/2006 66622/1020/10/2010Raisa Nikolayevna KORZH23/02/19621) Labour Disputes Commission of “Zavod Mayak”, 01/04/2009 2) Selydovsk Court, 07/07/2008 66882/1005/11/2010Valentyna Mykolayivna KUCHER03/04/19691) Svitlovodsk Court, 31/07/2006 2) Svitlovodsk Court, 22/12/2006 69639/1011/11/2010Petro Vasylyovych ZADERZHYNSKYY15/07/1920Dobropillya Court, 02/10/2007 5010/1115/01/2011Viktor Alekseyevich RASPOPOV20/10/1935Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 05/02/2009 APPENDIX 2(non-enforcement delays less than three years) No.Applicationno. and date of introductionApplicants’ name and date of birthRelevant domestic decisions 60679/0826/11/2008Vladyslav Valeriyovych AVDEYENKO10/06/1977Ternopil Court, 24/09/2007 50101/0901/09/2009Gennadiy Petrovych STROM26/06/1965Oleksandriya Court, 06/11/2008 51423/0909/09/2009Iryna Ivanivna SKOCHKO07/03/1971Oleksandriya Court, 27/02/2009 52625/0908/09/2009Olena Volodymyrivna CHAYKA AKA OSTAPENKO10/05/1979Oleksandriya Court, 27/02/2009 32380/1003/06/2010Nadiya Oleksandrivna ZAGYNAYLO04/10/1965 Yuliya Andriyivna SLOBODSKA AKA ZAGYNAYLO21/09/1986Golosiyivskyy District Court of Kyiv, 19/03/2009 52748/1004/09/2010Iryna Dmytrivna ULYANOVA06/08/19561) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 22/06/2009 2) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 22/02/2010, as amended by the judgment of the Kharkiv Regional Court of Appeal of 01/06/2010 55471/1017/09/2010Viktor Yakovych DRANYSH28/07/1936Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal, 11/08/2009