FIFTH SECTIONCASE OF SHVETS AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE(Applications nos. 50415/21 and 8 others –see appended list)      JUDGMENT STRASBOURG20 July 2023 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.In the case of Shvets and Others v. Ukraine,The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Carlo Ranzoni, President, Lado Chanturia, María Elósegui, judges,and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,Having deliberated in private on 29 June 2023,Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:PROCEDURE1.  The case originated in applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.2.  The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.THE FACTS3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.4.  The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.THE LAWJOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 3 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION6.  The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention and that they had no effective remedy in this connection. They relied on Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.7.  The Court notes that the applicants were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the applicants’ detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case‑law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 96‑101, ECHR 2016). It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are “degrading” from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see Muršić, cited above, §§ 122-41, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 149‑59, 10 January 2012).8.  In the leading cases of Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006 and Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, 30 January 2020, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.9.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ conditions of detention were inadequate.10.  The Court further notes that the applicants did not have at their disposal an effective remedy in respect of these complaints.11.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention.APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION12.  Article 41 of the Convention provides:“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”13.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Sukachov, cited above, §§ 165 and 167), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications;Declares the applications admissible;Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law;Holds(a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.Done in English, and notified in writing on 20 July 2023, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.  Viktoriya Maradudina Carlo Ranzoni Acting Deputy Registrar President   APPENDIXList of applications raising complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention(inadequate conditions of detention and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law)No.Application no.Date of introductionApplicant’s nameYear of birthRepresentative’s nameand locationFacilityStart and end dateDurationSq. mper inmateSpecific grievancesAmount awardedfor pecuniary andnon-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1]   50415/2103/10/2021Volodymyr Oleksandrovych SHVETS1982 Zakutniy Volodymyr IvanovychDniproDnipro Detention Facility no. 430/05/2011pendingMore than 12 years and9 days2.2-3.2 m²overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to shower7,500   52787/2103/10/2021Ruslan Volodymyrovych BONDARENKO1985 Zakutniy Volodymyr IvanovychDniproDnipro Detention Facility no. 426/05/2011pendingMore than 12 years and13 days2.8-3.7 m²overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet, no or restricted access to potable water7,500   52790/2103/10/2021Vitaliy Volodymyrovych ONYSHCHENKO1992 Zakutniy Volodymyr IvanovychDniproDnipro Detention Facility no. 414/11/2019 to03/11/20211 year and 11 months and 21 days2.5 m²overcrowding, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, lack of privacy for toilet, passive smoking4,900   56552/2108/11/2021Vitaliy Anatoliyovych SVISTUNOV1977 Rybiy Sergiy MykolayovychDniproKryvyy Rig Detention Facility No. 304/03/2014pendingMore than 9 years and 3 months and 4 days4 m²lack of fresh air, passive smoking, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to potable water, lack of privacy for toilet7,500   56555/2108/11/2021Anatoliy Oleksiyovych NYZHNYK1994 Rybiy Sergiy MykolayovychDniproKryvyy Rig Detention Facility No. 314/02/2014pendingMore than 9 years and 3 months and 25 days4 m²lack of fresh air, passive smoking, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to potable water7,500   56557/2108/11/2021Dmytro Viktorovych ZHALDAK1980 Rybiy Sergiy MykolayovychDniproKryvyy Rig Detention Facility No. 319/01/2013pendingMore than 10 years and4 months and 20 days4 m²lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to shower, passive smoking, lack of privacy for toilet7,500   61072/2110/12/2021Leonid Mikhaylovich ROVNYAGIN1980 Rybiy Sergiy MykolayovychDniproKryvyy Rig Detention Facility No. 319/01/2013pendingMore than 10 years and4 months and 20 days4.33 m² passive smoking, lack of fresh air, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, poor quality of potable water, no or restricted access to shower, lack of toiletries7,500   7516/2228/01/2022Oleksandr Mykolayovych KLYSHTA1980 Pustyntsev Andriy VitaliyovychDniproChernigiv Detention Facility22/02/2018pendingMore than 5 years and 3 months and 17 days2.5 m²overcrowding, lack of fresh air, passive smoking, lack of privacy for toilet, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to shower7,500   7519/2228/01/2022Oleksandr Anatoliyovych TARASYUK1983 Pustyntsev Andriy VitaliyovychDniproChernigiv Detention Facility25/01/2018pendingMore than 5 years and 4 months and 14 days2.8 m²overcrowding, passive smoking, lack of fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, no or restricted access to shower7,500  [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.