FIFTH SECTION     CASE OF ALPATOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE (Application no. 7321/05 and 107 other applications)          JUDGMENT This version was rectified on 4 February 2013under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court STRASBOURG 18 December 2012   This judgment is final. It may be subject to editorial revision.In the case of Alpatov and others v. Ukraine,The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Angelika Nußberger, President, André Potocki, Aleš Pejchal, judges,and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar,Having deliberated in private on 27 November 2012,Having noted that the underlying question in the applications is already the subject of well-established case-law of the Court and that the parties had the ample opportunity to comment on it and on any other aspects of the case,Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:PROCEDURE1.  The case originated in 108 applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by 118 Ukrainian nationals and companies based in Ukraine, whose details are specified in the annexed tables (“the applicants”).2.  The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr N. Kultchytskyy, of the Ministry of Justice.3.  The applications, which mainly concern the issues of lengthy non-enforcement of domestic decisions given in the applicants’ favour, were communicated to the Government on various dates. The Government have submitted observations concerning some of the applications. Having been initially adjourned in accordance with the Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov pilot judgment (see Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine, no. 40450/04, ECHR 2009‑... (extracts)), the proceedings in the applications have been resumed in February 2012 (for further details see Kharuk and others v. Ukraine [Committee], no.703/05, §§ 4-6, 26 July 2012).4.  On various dates the Government submitted to the Court unilateral declarations concerning all the present applications, and requested the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases pursuant to Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention on the basis of the declarations. The Court examined the declarations and decided to reject the Government’s requests.THE FACTSI.  THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASEA.  Non-enforcement issues5.  On the dates set out in the annexed tables domestic courts and commissions on labour disputes delivered decisions according to which the applicants were entitled to various pecuniary amounts and/or to have certain actions taken in their favour. The decisions became enforceable. However, the applicants were unable to obtain the enforcement of the decisions in due time because of the authorities’ failure to take specific budgetary or regulatory measures, because of the introduction of bans on the attachment and sale of property belonging to State-owned or controlled companies, or because of the bailiffs’ omissions.B.  Other matters6.  Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues.THE LAWI.  JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS7.  In view of the similarity of the applications in terms of the principal legal issues raised, the Court finds it appropriate to join them.II.  ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 6 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ARTICLE 1 OF PRTOCOL No. 18.  The applicants complained about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 which read, in so far as relevant, as follows:Article 6“In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by [a] tribunal...”Article 13 “Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.”Article 1 of Protocol No. 1“Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law... Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.”A.  Admissibility9.  The Court notes that the applicants’ above complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible.B.  Merits10.  The Court notes that the decisions in the applicants’ favour remained unenforced for lengthy periods of time, for which the authorities were responsible.11.  The Court reiterates that it has already found violations of the Convention in similar cases (see Kharuk and others, cited above, §§ 17-19).12.  Having examined all the material in its possession, the Court finds no fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion in the present cases.13.  There has accordingly been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the prolonged non-enforcement of the decisions in the applicants’ favour and a violation of Article 13 of the Convention in that the applicants did not have an effective domestic remedy to redress the damage created by such non-enforcement.III.  OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION14.  Some of the applicants raised other complaints under the Convention which the Court has carefully examined. In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court finds that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols.15.  It follows that those complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.IV.  APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION16.  Article 41 of the Convention provides:“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”A.  Damage, costs, and expenses17.  In line with the approach applied in Kharuk and others (cited above, §§ 23-27), the Court considers it reasonable and equitable to award 3,000 euros (EUR) to each applicant in the applications which concern non-enforcement delays exceeding three years (the applications tabulated in Annex 1) and EUR 1,500 to each applicant in the other applications (the applications tabulated in Annex 2). These sums are to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, as well as costs and expenses.18.  The Court further notes that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to enforce the decisions which have not been enforced.B.  Default interest19.  The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY1.  Decides to join the applications; 2.  Declares the applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints admissible and the remainder of the applications inadmissible; 3.  Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1; 4.  Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention; 5.  Holds (a)  that the respondent State is to enforce the domestic decisions in the applicants’ favour which have not been enforced and is to pay, within three months, EUR 3,000 (three thousand euros) to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications tabulated in Annex 1 and EUR 1,500 (one thousand five hundred euros) to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications tabulated in Annex 2 in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants on the above amounts which are to be converted into the national currency at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 December 2012, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.Stephen Phillips Angelika NußbergerDeputy Registrar President ANNEX 1(non-enforcement delays more than three years) No.Applicationno. and date of introductionApplicant’s name anddate of birth (if known)Enforceable domestic decisions         7321/0508/02/2005Oleg Veniaminovich ALPATOV194914 March 2000,Novogrodivka Court        13333/0522/03/2005Boris Ivanovich KARLOV13/09/195025 January 2001 and 25 October 2002,Khartzysk Court        16716/0514/03/2005Vladimir Nikolayevich SOKOLOV16/11/195615. July 2003 and 28 May 2004Krasnyy Luch Court        40631/0504/11/2005Tamara Antonovna YAROSHENKO25/05/192827 October 2000,Leninskyy District Court of Luhansk        43801/0509/11/2005TIPIKO, TOV 05 August 2004,Commercial Court of the Zakarpattya Region        7478/0627/01/2006Viktor Vsevolodovich BONDALET04/05/194810 August 2004,Shahtarsk Court        26577/0615/06/2006Tatyana Vladimirovna MURENETS18/11/197225 November 1999 and 10 February 2006,Nova Kakhovka Court        29112/0630/06/2006Anatoliy Ivanovych ROMANOV05/01/19515 January 2006,Dzerzhynsk Court        31936/0629/07/2006Gennadiy Viktorovych KUDINOV25/03/197014 June 2004,Leninskyy District Court of Kirovograd        46311/0627/10/2006Volodymyr Borysovych TURITSA24/11/195617 April 2006,Gorodenka Court, as amended by the judgment of the Ivano-Frankivsk Court of Appeal of 26 February 2008        48065/0610/11/2006Igor Fedorovich DERMANSKIY30/07/196916 April 1997,Artemivskyy District Court of Luhansk        6212/0727/12/2006Angelina Ivanivna KOZAK28/11/19428 November 2004,Stryy Court        6731/0714/12/2006FIRMA DEMEK, TOV21 August 2001,Commercial Court of the Donetsk Region,        6759/0715/01/2007Oleksiy Ivanovych ZUBENKO13/12/195720 January 2001,Bluznukivskyy District Court of the Kharkiv Region        7937/0710/02/2007Volodymyr Ilarionovych KONDRATYEV195617 March 2000,Bryanka Court        8849/0709/02/2007Ilya Vladimirovich CHERKAS11/08/195519 December 2005,Velykonovosilkivsk Court        10033/0709/02/2007Yekaterina Iosifovna PERERVA05/09/194213 November 2001,Rozdolne Court        11074/0726/02/2007Mykola Vasylyovych GUSEV17/12/19455 September 2006,Poltava Regional Court of Appeal, quashed on 26 January 2009 and a new judgment of the Poltava Regional Court of Appeal of 18 May 2009 in the same case        14676/0714/03/2007Valeriy Vatslavych ZHURAKIVSKYY13/11/19581 November 2006,Berdychiv Court        20132/0731/03/2007Sergey Mikhaylovich SERGEYEV15/07/19576 July 2006,Kyivslyy District Court of Kharkiv        31187/0724/05/2007Irina Ernatovna KRAVTSOVA26/03/196722 November 2004,Leninskyy District Court of Luhansk        31441/0721/06/2007Liliya Nikolayevna LOGINOVA28/08/19561. 26 August 2005,Novogrodivka Court 2. 26 December 2005,Novogrodivka Court        48049/0723/10/2007Volodymyr Petrovych BOYKO14/04/196024 May 2004,Mohyliv-Podilsk Court        51917/0714/11/2007Georgiy Ivanovych POGOSKYY02/07/19536 December 2005,Commercial Court of the Poltava Region        4790/0824/12/2007Vadim Stanislavovich DMITRIYEV15/03/197901 June 2005, Krasnyy Luch Court        9033/0807/02/2008Tatyana Sergeyevna PUGACH11/10/195415 February 2002 ,Yenakievo Court        14461/0827/02/2008Boris Nikolayevich LYSYUK09/03/19821 October 2003,Commercial Court of the Donetsk Region        14599/0803/03/2008Lyubov Sergeyevna DMITRENKO11/11/194730 May 2005,Krasnyy Luch Court        19753/0807/04/2008Volodymyr Mykhaylovych LOPUSHANSKYY17/08/195513 December 2005,Arbuzynka Court, as amended by the Mykolaiv Regional Court of Appeal on 7 April 2006        19791/0811/04/2008Valeriy Aleksandrovich LANOVENKO193816 November 2006,Fastov Court        28121/0827/05/2008Svetlana Petrovna BOYEVA29/02/196027 May 2005,Krasnyy Luch Court        28203/0827/05/2008Aleksey Nikolayevich TEMCHUR04/02/195618 July 2005,Krasnyy Luch Court        28974/0807/06/2008Lyubov Gilyaryevna KHLYNINA22/08/195611 May 2005,Krasnyy Luch Court        28975/0807/06/2008Viktor Frantsevich ALMIZOV25/05/194030 March 2007,Krasnyy Luch Court        28991/0807/06/2008Tatyana Ivanovna LAKIYCHUK02/07/194921 May 2007,Krasnyy Luch Court        29382/0807/06/2008Lyudmila Ivanovna SILENKO05/06/19517 May 2004,Torez Court        35562/0815/07/2008Tatyana Mikhaylovna VINOGRADOVA30/10/195020 July 2005,Krasnyy Luch Court        37108/0817/06/2008Leonid Petrovich VITSKO02/09/195618 July 2005,Krasnyy Luch Court        37112/0817/06/2008Tamara Ivanovna DIKAYA24/04/195127 December 2005,Krasnyy Luch Court        50079/0824/09/2008Zoya Grigoryevna IZOTOVA26/02/19541. 5 February 2001, labour disputes commission2. 14 March 2001, Kostyantynivka Court3. 21 May 2001, labour disputes commission4. 14 December 2001, Kostyantynivka Court        51743/0806/10/2008Yuriy Konstantinovich IVANOV16/12/194630 April 2003,Gagarinskyy District Court of Sevastopol        498/0909/12/2008Anton Oleksandrovych SKRYPCHENKO15/10/19571. 22 September 2004,Kyivskyy District Court of Odesa 2. 19 April 2006,Kyivskyy District Court of Odesa        12803/0916/02/2009Lyudmila Viktorovna PROTSKO12/02/19531. 28 April 2004,Kostyantynivka Court 2. 28 September 2006,Kostyantynivka Court        13589/0916/02/2009Vladimir Vladimirovich ZAZVORKA21/06/19564 November 2001,labour disputes commission        17848/0915/03/2009Tatyana Ilyinichna VAKHETOVA05/02/19521 December 1999, Kostyantynivka Court2. Sergey Viktorovich VOLOSUNOV05/08/196315 January 2001, labour disputes commission3. Yekaterina Vasilyevna MUDREYKO29/11/195025 January 2001, Kostyantynivka Court4. Vladimir Yakovlevich KRIVENKO21/01/194112 February 2001, labour disputes commission5. Nadezhda Vasilyevna KACHURA30/07/195012 March 2001, Kostyantynivka Court6. Lyudmila Petrovna KOVALENKO25/08/195423 April 2001, Kostyantynivka Court7. Aleksandr Mikhaylovich NETESA11/03/194313 October 2004, Kostyantynivka Court8. Tamara Mikhaylovna SERDYUCHENKO25/03/19507 December 2001, Kostyantynivka Court9. Nataliya Nikolayevna CHAUS25/09/19569 December 2004, Kostyantynivka Court10. Nelli Grigoryevna PEREMETINA30/08/194522 May 2006, Kostyantynivka Court        20353/0926/03/2009Viktor Ivanovich ROMANENKO16/05/19601. 11 April 2006,Zaliznychnyy District Court of Simferpol 2. 7 December 2006[1], Yevpatoriya Court        26329/0904/03/2009Nina Dmitriyevna VOLKOVA13/12/19441.20 October 1997, Slovyansk Court2.4 June 1998, Slovyansk Court3. 10 March 1999, Slovyansk Court4.21 May 2002, Vyshgorod Court        33507/0905/06/2009Natalya Mikhaylovna BAMBALOVA08/01/195413 November 2000,labour disputes commission        44881/0904/08/2009Valentyna Ivanivna KHAVRYCH04/03/19646 November 2007,Kamyanka Court        44926/0906/08/2009Lyudmila Alekseyevna YAROSHEVSKAYA16/08/194920 December 2006, Dzerzhinsky District Court of Kharkiv        48274/0926/08/2009Aleksandra Mikhaylovna KOROVNIKOVA10/01/193623 August 2002,Torets Court        51879/0913/09/2009Fedir Romanovych SHEVELEV19221. 11 February 2008,Donetsk Regional Administrative Court 2. 03 November 2008,Donetsk Regional Administrative Court        56226/0906/10/2009ASKO, MKP30 July 2004,Commercial Court of the Kherson Region        59492/0926/10/2009Denis Aleksandrovich SECHKAREV17/09/197811 October 2006,Krasnyy Luch Court        62399/0913/11/2009Leonid Viktorovych TSESAR196212 December 2007,Oleksandriya Court, as amended by the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Court of Appeal on 23 December 2008        4252/1012/01/2010Mykola Petrovych VINNICHENKO08/05/195324 December 2007,Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Zaporizhzhya        12476/1020/02/2010Ivan Petrovych FUTALO16/03/195920 December 2005,Sokal Court         14075/1019/02/2010Stanislav Fedorovych SHEVCHENKO01/11/19451. 30 May 2005,Oleksandriya Court 2. 17 March 2009,Oleksandriya Court        14108/1024/02/2010Antonina Mytrofanivna TKACHENKO29/06/195027 February 2009,Oleksandriya Court        14171/1028/02/2010Grygoriy Ivanovych TERNAVSKYY15/08/192707 April 2009,Kalanchak Court        14743/1004/03/2010Igor Pavlovich KOSMACHOV31/08/197222 May 2006,Korabelnyy District Court of Mykolayiv        14824/1026/02/2010Valentyna Pavlivna TERNAVSKA25/04/19277 April 2009, Kalanchak Court        14873/1005/03/2010Anatoliy Vladimirovich GAVRILENKO06/09/197422 May 2006,Korabelnyy District Court of Mykolayiv        19497/1021/03/2010Tamara Grygorivna GROMOVA25/12/193426 November 2008,Zhytomyr Regional Administrative Court        20291/1001/04/2010Nataliya Yuryevna SOSHENKO04/05/1953 1. 20 May 2005,Komsomolskyy District Court of Kherson 2. 20 July 2006,Komsomolskyy District Court of Kherson 3. 16 October 2006,Komsomolskyy District Court of Kherson, 4. 3 May 2007,Komsomolskyy District Court of Kherson        23262/1002/04/2010Nadiya Georgiyivna MAKOVOZ25/03/195411 January 2008,Pervomaysk Court        23950/1012/04/2010Nataliya Ivanivna DAVYDENKO26/01/19561.28 February 2008,Pervomaysk Court 2. 20 March 2008,Pervomaysk Court        24642/1017/04/2010Nikolay Aleksandrovich SPODIN03/08/19281. 15 May 2008,Leninskyy District Court of Sevastopol 2. 8 October 2009,Leninskyy District Court of Sevastopol 3. 21 January 2010,Leninskyy District Court of Sevastopol        25981/1023/04/2010Nelya Yevgeniyivna UTKINA28/06/19585 February 2007,Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsya        25997/1021/04/2010Oleksiy Mykolayovych KACHAYLO04/06/194920 February 2009,Okhtyrka Court        29072/1007/05/2010Roman Mykhaylovych KOMAR18/03/195014 June 2001,Frankivskyy District Court of Lviv Region        29963/1030/04/2010Oleksandr Fedorovych SHVETS11/03/194519 November 2007,Dniprovskyy District Court of Kherson        33114/1020/05/2010Nataliya Borysivna ABRAMENKO29/03/195818 December 2007,Brovary Court        33135/1020/05/2010Igor Yevgeniyovych SHOBOTENKO12/04/197320 December 2007,Brovary Court        33139/1020/05/2010Vadym Yevgeniyovych SHOBOTENKO14/02/19786 December 2007,Brovary Court        33161/1020/05/2010Pavlo Vyacheslavovych KUCHUGURNYY02/10/19641.13 November 2008,Artemivskyy District Court of Luhansk 2. 26 February 2009,Artemivskyy District Court of Luhansk 3. 16 March 2009,Artemivskyy District Court of Luhansk        33164/1020/05/2010Iryna Anatoliyivna RYABUSHCHYTSunspecified1 April 2008,Brovary Court        34350/1009/06/2010Mykola Nykyforovych NOVAK11/10/195928 May 2008,Oleksandriya Court as amended on 14 April 2009 by the Dnipropetrovsk Administrative Court of Appeal        35024/1014/06/2010Svitlana Kalenykivna FINKEVYCH18/03/19568 November 2002,Lutsk Court        35077/1006/06/2010Grygoriy Oleksandrovych OBUSHCHAK14/02/19602 March 2007,Staromistskyy District Court of Vinnytsya        35424/1014/06/2010Iryna Oleksandrivna OVCHINNIKOVA06/12/19794 April 2008, Desnyanskyy District Court of Chernigiv, as amended on8 July 2009 byKyiv Administrative Court of Appeal        35890/1016/06/2010Vladimir Dmitriyevich FISAK18/06/195520 July 2005,Dzerzhynsk Court        38178/1026/06/2010Yevgeniy Ivanovich ZELYUNKO25/08/193726 January 2009,Zhytomyr Regional Administrative Court        41281/1024/06/2010Volodymyr Petrovych MAZURAKA26/02/195819 November 2003,Chervonograd Court        42642/1017/02/2010Irina Romilovna KARPACHEVA14/06/195828 May 2008,Kostyantynivka Court[2]        51453/1026/08/2010Grigoriy Mikhaylovich SUPRUN20/07/195520 August 2006,Svitlovodsk Court        56269/1020/09/2010Terentiy Semenovych GERASYMOV24/04/19549 April 2009,Zhytomyr Regional Administrative Court        59584/1028/09/2010Yuriy Mykhaylovych ZHGUTOV15/06/192612 December 2007,Novozavodskyy District Court of Chernigiv        66363/1030/10/2010Valeriy Yegorovych KOMBAYEV21/04/194210 June 2008, the Crimea Court of Appeal         69158/1017/11/2010Vasyl Mykytovych ILCHENKO19271. 2 November 2007,Zhytomyr Regional Administrative Court 2. 7 October 2008,Zhytomyr Regional Administrative Court        75025/1007/12/2010Viktor Alekseyevich LAPSHIN02/01/194318 August 2009,Kalininskyy District Court of Donetsk        671/1117/12/2010Tetyana Volenivna TABACHENKO09/01/197817 June 2009,Leninskyy District Court of Luhansk,became enforceable on 2 October 2009 1391/1127/12/2010Gennadiy Sergiyovych ALDABAYEV20/05/194030 January 2008,Zhytomyr Regional Administrative Court        2157/1115/12/2010Valentina Petrovna TATARCHENKO02/04/195017 September 2002,Kostyantynivka Court        3217/1108/12/2010Leonid Ivanovych BOBIK05/06/19352 March 2009,Zhytomyr Regional Administrative Court        1513/1123/12/2010Vitaliy Viktorovich TOLKACHOV08/06/198420 June 2006,Antratsyt CourtANNEX 2(non-enforcement delays less than three years) No.Applicationno. and date of introductionApplicant’s name anddate of birth (if known)Enforceable domestic decisions        10704/0722/02/2007Natali Valeriyivna NOVYTSKA02/08/197624 November 2005, Suvorovskyy District Court of Kherson,quashed on 3 June 2008         3863/0811/01/2008Yuriy Tymofiyovych OPANASYUKunspecified25 May 2005,Kyiv Harrison Military Court,became enforceable on 22 February 2006 and was enforced in full in November 2008         18167/0817/03/2008Tatyana Ivanovna MIKHAL195121 October 2005,Zhovtnevyy District Court of Dnipropetrovsk,quashed on 18 September 2007[3]         27320/0828/05/2008Vasyl Mykolayovych GEYTOTA09/01/19616 February 2006,Kolomyya Court,enforced on 28 January 2008        35012/0811/06/2008Kostyantyn Antonovych ZUBKO20/02/195416 June 2006,Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv,quashed on 25 February 2009        46147/0912/11/2008Pavel Ivanovich BONDAR16/04/196013 August 2007,Donetsk Regional Administrative Court, quashed on 12 November 2009        4980/1013/01/2010Vladimir Nikolayevich KARTASHOV03/01/19516 February 2008,Donetsk Regional Administrative Court, quashed on 3 June 2010        12100/1015/02/2010Svitlana Ivanivna DUBOVENKO24/08/193716 January 2008,Zarichnyy District Court of Sumy,quashed on 19 August 2010        19148/1021/03/2010Sergey Aleksandrovich KHMELEVSKIY27/05/1960 Vyacheslav Iosifovich KULBACHKO18/03/19562 July 2009,Makiivka Court,enforced on 14 July 2011        48233/1005/08/2010Mykola Volodymyrovych KOKHANOVSKYY11/02/19612 June 2009, Khmelnytskyy Court,as amended on 12 January 2010 by the Khmelnytsk Regional Court of Appeal        71356/1023/11/2010Leonid Anatolyevich ZARAYSKIY12/12/196126 September 2008, Lysychansk Court,quashed on 7 April 2011        3282/1129/12/2010Oleksandr Petrovych DORDUKAunspecified4 November 2008, Kaniv Court,as amended by the Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeal on 22 December 2009 [1].  Rectified on 4 February 2013; the text read “6 December”.[2].  Rectified on 4 February 2013; the text read “21 March 2002 and 28 May 2008”.[3].  Rectified on 4 February 2013; the text read “28 September”.