FIFTH SECTIONCASE OF SALKOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE(Applications nos. 13087/17 and 10 others –see appended list)      JUDGMENT STRASBOURG18 January 2024 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.In the case of Salkov and Others v. Ukraine,The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Mārtiņš Mits, President, Kateřina Šimáčková, Mykola Gnatovskyy, judges,and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,Having deliberated in private on 14 December 2023,Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:PROCEDURE1.  The case originated in applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.2.  The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.THE FACTS3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.THE LAWJOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS4.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 AND ARTICLE 13 OF THE CONVENTION5.  The applicants complained that the length of the civil proceedings in their cases had been incompatible with the “reasonable time” requirement and that they had no effective remedy in this connection. They relied on Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention.6.  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).7.  In the leading case of Karnaushenko v. Ukraine (no. 23853/02, 30 November 2006), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.8.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the “reasonable time” requirement.9.  The Court further notes that the applicants did not have at their disposal an effective remedy in respect of these complaints.10.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 6 § 1 and of Article 13 of the Convention.APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION11.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Karnaushenko, cited above, §§ 70 and 75), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY, Decides to join the applications;Declares the applications admissible;Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law;Holds(a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 January 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. Viktoriya Maradudina Mārtiņš Mits Acting Deputy Registrar PresidentAPPENDIXList of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention(excessive length of civil proceedings and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law)No.Application no.Date of introductionApplicant’s nameYear of birthRepresentative’s name and locationStart of proceedingsEnd of proceedingsTotal lengthLevels of jurisdictionAmount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant/ household(in euros)[1]   13087/1708/02/2017Volodymyr Viktorovych SALKOV1956   19/12/201423/06/20216 years and6 months and 5 days3 levels of jurisdiction900   18378/1722/02/2017Oleg Valeriyovych IVANISHCHEV1972 Avramenko Gennadiy MykolayovychChernigiv21/11/201429/09/20216 years and10 months and 9 days3 levels of jurisdiction900   20605/1706/03/2017Valentyn Vasylyovych TVERDOKHLIB1963   26/11/201429/06/20216 years and7 months and 4 days3 levels of jurisdiction900   1532/1829/12/2017Igor Anatoliyovych PRYSHKO1979 Avramenko Gennadiy MykolayovychChernigiv11/11/2014 pending More than9 years and 4 days3 levels of jurisdiction1,800   19904/1817/04/2018Oleksandr Anatoliyovych GARDETSKYY1978 Avramenko Gennadiy MykolayovychChernigiv07/04/2015 30/09/2021 6 years and5 months and 24 days3 levels of jurisdiction600   57092/1823/11/2018Igor Volodymyrovych ROGATYUK1976 Avramenko Gennadiy MykolayovychChernigiv03/11/2014 15/12/2021 7 years and1 month and 13 days3 levels of jurisdiction900   38183/1827/07/2018Oleksandr Pavlovych PROSKURIN1958   19/01/2015 pending More than 8 yearsand 10 months and 5 days3 levels of jurisdiction2,300   2370/1911/12/2018HouseholdOlga Petrivna KOTOVSKA1982Mariya Dmytrivna KOTOVSKA1959Mukan Ivan VasylyovychStaryy Sambir15/12/2006pendingMore than 16 yearsand 11 months and 2 days1 level of jurisdiction8,400   12788/1927/02/2019Anatoliy Grygorovych LOZA1946   08/06/201016/11/201126/07/201624/05/201119/05/201627/06/2018 (decision of 27/06/2018 received by the applicant on 27/08/2018)7 years and 4 monthsand 23 days3 levels of jurisdiction900 38492/2122/07/2021Oleg Yuriyovych ANDRUSHCHENKO1988 Sobyna Pavlo MykolayovychOkhtyrka28/03/2019pendingMore than 4 years and7 months and 18 days1 level of jurisdiction1,500 3741/2330/12/2022Galyna Mykhaylivna SHEPELEVA1972 Trushkivska Lesya ViktorivnaKyiv25/03/201431/08/20228 years and 5 monthsand 7 days3 levels of jurisdiction1,200 [1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.