THIRD SECTION
CASE OF MELETIOU AND OTHERS v. GREECE
(Application no. 28737/23)
 
 
 
 
 
 
JUDGMENT
 
STRASBOURG
26 February 2026
 
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Meletiou and Others v. Greece,
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
 Diana Kovatcheva, President,
 Canòlic Mingorance Cairat,
 Vasilka Sancin, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 5 February 2026,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in an application against Greece lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 12 July 2023. 2. The applicants were represented by Mr S. Konstantopoulos, a lawyer practising in Thessaloniki. 3. The Greek Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the application. THE FACTS
4. The applicants’ details and information relevant to the application are set out in the appended table. 5. The applicants complained of the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law to complain about it. THE LAW
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 AND ARTICLE 13 OF THE CONVENTION
6. The applicants complained of the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment given in their favour and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in that regard. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention. 7. The Court reiterates that the execution of a judgment given by any court must be regarded as an integral part of a “hearing” for the purposes of Article 6. It also refers to its case-law concerning the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of final domestic judgments (see Hornsby v. Greece, no. 18357/91, § 40, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997‑II). 8. In the leading cases of Kanellopoulos v. Greece, no. 11325/06, 21 February 2008, and Bousiou v. Greece, no. 21455/10, 24 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the authorities did not deploy all necessary efforts to enforce fully and in due time judgment no. 2950/2013 of the three-member Administrative Court of First Instance of Thessaloniki in the applicants’ favour. 10. The Court further notes that the applicants did not have at their disposal an effective remedy in respect of these complaints. 11.

Outcome for Article 13: violation