SEX DISCRIMINATION Citation, interpretation and extent 1 1 These regulations may be cited as the Sex Discrimination (Indirect Discrimination and Burden of Proof) Regulations 2001. 2 In these regulations “the 1975 Act ” means the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 . 3 These regulations shall extend to Great Britain only. Commencement and transitional provisions 2 1 These regulations shall come into force on 12th October 2001 (in this regulation referred to as “the commencement date”). 2 Regulations 5 and 6 apply in relation to proceedings instituted before the commencement date, as well as those instituted on or after that date, but do not affect any case in which proceedings in the employment tribunal, county court or sheriff court were determined before the commencement date. Sex discrimination 3 For section 1 of the 1975 Act there is substituted— Direct and indirect discrimination against women 1 1 In any circumstances relevant for the purposes of any provision of this Act, other than a provision to which subsection (2) applies, a person discriminates against a woman if— a on the ground of her sex he treats her less favourably than he treats or would treat a man, or b he applies to her a requirement or condition which he applies or would apply equally to a man but— i which is such that the proportion of women who can comply with it is considerably smaller than the proportion of men who can comply with it, and ii which he cannot show to be justifiable irrespective of the sex of the person to whom it is applied, and iii which is to her detriment because she cannot comply with it. 2 In any circumstances relevant for the purposes of a provision to which this subsection applies, a person discriminates against a woman if— a on the ground of her sex, he treats her less favourably than he treats or would treat a man, or b he applies to her a provision, criterion or practice which he applies or would apply equally to a man, but— i which is such that it would be to the detriment of a considerably larger proportion of women than of men, and ii which he cannot show to be justifiable irrespective of the sex of the person to whom it is applied, and iii which is to her detriment. 3 Subsection (2) applies to— a any provision of Part 2, b sections 35A and 35B , and c any other provision of Part 3, so far as it applies to vocational training. 4 If a person treats or would treat a man differently according to the man’s marital status, his treatment of a woman is for the purposes of subsection (1)(a) or (2)(a) to be compared to his treatment of a man having the like marital status. Discrimination against married persons 4 For section 3 of the 1975 Act there is substituted— Direct and indirect discrimination against married persons in employment field 3 1 In any circumstances relevant for the purposes of any provision of Part 2, a person discriminates against a married person of either sex if— a on the ground of his or her marital status he treats that person less favourably than he treats or would treat an unmarried person of the same sex, or b he applies to that person a provision, criterion or practice which he applies or would apply equally to an unmarried person, but— i which is such that it would be to the detriment of a considerably larger proportion of married persons than of unmarried persons of the same sex, and ii which he cannot show to be justifiable irrespective of the marital status of the person to whom it is applied, and iii which is to that person’s detriment. 2 For the purposes of subsection (1), a provision of Part 2 framed with reference to discrimination against women shall be treated as applying equally to the treatment of men, and for that purpose shall have effect with such modifications as are requisite. Burden of proof: employment tribunals 5 After section 63 of the 1975 Act there is inserted— Burden of proof: employment tribunals 63A 1 This section applies to any complaint presented under section 63 to an employment tribunal. 2 Where, on the hearing of the complaint, the complainant proves facts from which the tribunal could, apart from this section, conclude in the absence of an adequate explanation that the respondent— a has committed an act of discrimination against the complainant which is unlawful by virtue of Part 2, or b is by virtue of section 41 or 42 to be treated as having committed such an act of discrimination against the complainant, the tribunal shall uphold the complaint unless the respondent proves that he did not commit, or, as the case may be, is not to be treated as having committed, that act. Burden of proof: county and sheriff courts 6 After section 66 of the 1975 Act there is inserted— Burden of proof: county and sheriff courts 66A 1 This section applies to any claim brought under section 66(1) in a county court in England and Wales or a sheriff court in Scotland. 2 Where, on the hearing of the claim, the claimant proves facts from which the court could, apart from this section, conclude in the absence of an adequate explanation that the respondent— a has committed an act of discrimination against the claimant which is unlawful by virtue of— i section 35A or 35B, or ii any other provision of Part 3 so far as it applies to vocational training, or b is by virtue of section 41 or 42 to be treated as having committed such an act of discrimination against the claimant, the court shall uphold the claim unless the respondent proves that he did not commit, or, as the case may be, is not to be treated as having committed, that act. Claims under Part 3 of the 1975 Act so far as it applies to vocational training 7 After section 66(3) of the 1975 Act there is inserted— 3A Subsection (3) does not affect the award of damages in respect of an unlawful act of discrimination falling within section 1(2)(b). Consequential amendments of 1975 Act 8 1 In section 5(3) of the 1975 Act, for “section 1(1)” there is substituted “section 1(1) or (2)”. 2 In section 37 of the 1975 Act, for subsection (1) there is substituted— 1 In this section “discriminatory practice” means— a the application of a provision, criterion or practice which results in an act of discrimination which is unlawful by virtue of any provision of Part 2 or 3 taken with section 1(2)(b) or 3(1)(b) or which would be likely to result in such an act of discrimination if the persons to whom it is applied were not all of one sex, or b the application of a requirement or condition which results in an act of discrimination which is unlawful by virtue of any provision of Part 3 taken with section 1(1)(b) or which would be likely to result in such an act of discrimination if the persons to whom it is applied were not all of one sex. 3 In section 65(1B) of the 1975 Act— a for “section 1(1)(b)” there is substituted “section 1(2)(b)”, and b for “requirement or condition” there is substituted “provision, criterion or practice”. 4 In section 82(1) of the 1975 Act, after the definition of “proprietor” there is inserted— “provision, criterion or practice” includes “requirement or condition;”. . Amendment of Employment Act 1989 9 In section 1 of the Employment Act 1989 (overriding of statutory requirements which conflict with certain provisions of the 1975 Act), in subsection (3)— a for “requirement or condition”, wherever occurring, there is substituted “provision, criterion or practice”, b for “subsection (1)(b)(i) of section 1 or 3” there is substituted “section 1(2)(b)(i) or 3(1)(b)(i)”, c in paragraph (a), for “subsection (1)(b)(ii) of that section” there is substituted “section 1(2)(b)(ii) or 3(1)(b)(ii) of that Act”, and d in paragraph (b), for “subsection (1)(b)(ii)” there is substituted “section 1(2)(b)(ii) or 3(1)(b)(ii)”. Patricia Hewitt Secretary of State, Department of Trade and Industry 20th July 2001