High Court Of Justiciary Citation, commencement etc. 1 1 This Act of Adjournal may be cited as the Act of Adjournal (Criminal Procedure Rules Amendment No. 3) (Miscellaneous) 2013. 2 It comes into force on 24th June 2013. 3 A certified copy of this Act of Adjournal is to be inserted in the Books of Adjournal. 4 The Criminal Procedure Rules 1996 are amended in accordance with the following paragraphs. Reduction of disqualification period for drink-drive offenders 2 1 In rule 20.19 (reduction of disqualification period for drink-drive offenders)— a for each reference to “course organiser” and “course organiser’s”, substitute respectively “course provider” and “course provider’s”; b in subparagraph (1) for each reference to “section 34C(2)”, substitute “section 34C(3)”; c in subparagraph (1) for the first reference to “date specified” substitute “relevant date”; d in subparagraphs (2)(c) and (3) for “date specified” substitute “relevant date”; e in subparagraph (3) for “section 34B(7)”, substitute “section 34B(8)”; f in subparagraph (4) for “section 34B(6) or (7)”, substitute “section 34B(6) or (8)”. 2 In the appendix— a in Form 20.19-A (Form of application under section 34B(6) of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988)— i for each reference to “course organiser” and “course organiser’s”, substitute respectively “course provider” and “course provider’s”; ii for each reference to “date specified”, substitute “relevant date specified”. b in Form 20.19-B (Form of application under section 34B(7) of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988)— i for “section 34B(7)” substitute “section 34B(8)”; ii for each reference to “course organiser” substitute “course provider”; iii for each reference to “date specified” substitute “relevant date specified”; iv the title of the Form becomes “Form of application under section 34B(8) of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988”. Compatibility issues and devolution issues 3 1 In rule 40.12 (orders pending determination of compatibility issues or devolution issues) — a for paragraph (1) substitute— 1 Where a court makes a reference mentioned in rule 40.10 or rule 40.11 it may make such orders as it considers just and equitable in the circumstances pending the determination of the compatibility issue or devolution issue. 1A Where an appeal under paragraph 13(a) of Schedule 6 is taken, the High Court of Justiciary may make such orders as it considers just and equitable in the circumstances pending the determination of that appeal. 1B Without prejudice to the generality of paragraphs (1) and (1A), orders made under those paragraphs may include— a an order postponing any diet, including a trial diet, fixed in the case; b such orders as the court considers appropriate in relation to bail; c subject to paragraph (2), an order extending the period within which any step requires to be taken or event to have occurred. . b in paragraph (2), omit the words “under paragraph (1)(c)”. 2 In rule 40.13(1)(b) (procedure on receipt of determination of compatibility issue or devolution issue), after “rule 40.11” omit the remainder of the sentence. Written record of state of preparation 4 1 In the appendix, Form 9A.4 (Form of written record of state of preparation) is amended in accordance with the following subparagraphs. 2 In Schedule 1 (prosecutor), in question 11 (availability of witnesses) for “paragraph 9” substitute “paragraph 10”. 3 In Schedule 2 (legal representative), in question 14 (availability of witness) for “paragraph 9” substitute “paragraph 13”. Television link evidence 5 In the appendix, in Form 23A.1-A (Form of petition for issue of letter of request under section 273(2) or 273A(2) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995) — a in paragraph 1, for “indicated” substitute “indicted”; b for paragraph 6 substitute— BRIAN GILL Lord Justice General I.P.D. Edinburgh 13th June 2013