Exiting The European Union Citation and commencement 1 These Regulations may be cited as the Immigration (Persons Designated under Sanctions Regulations) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020 and come into force on the twenty-first day after the day on which they are made. Interpretation 2 In these Regulations— “the 1971 Act” means the Immigration Act 1971 ; “the 2018 Act” means the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018; “sanctions regulations” means regulations under section 1 of the 2018 Act. Effect of immigration designation: persons lawfully in the United Kingdom 3 1 Paragraph (2) applies if— a a person is the subject of an immigration designation ; and b at the time of the designation, the person is lawfully in the United Kingdom. 2 The person is to be treated as a person falling within subsection (5A)(a) of section 8B of the 1971 Act — a for a period beginning with the day on which the designation is made and ending with the expiry of 20 working days from the day on which the designation is notified to that person in accordance with the sanctions regulations under which it is made; and b if within that period the person makes an immigration claim, until the person is given notice of the appropriate Minister’s decision on it. 2A Paragraph (2) ceases to apply if the person leaves the United Kingdom. 3 Paragraph (2)(b) does not apply for the purposes of considering, and making a decision on, the person’s immigration claim. 4 In calculating the expiry of 20 working days for the purposes of paragraph (2)(a), the day on which the person is notified of the designation is to be included; and for that purpose a reference to the day on which the person is notified includes a reference to the day on which, in accordance with the sanctions regulations in question, the person is to be taken to have been notified. 5 In this regulation “working day” means any day except a Saturday or Sunday or a day which is a bank holiday in any part of the United Kingdom under section 1 of the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971 . Treatment and determination of immigration claims 4 1 In a case to which paragraph (2) of regulation 3 applies, if an immigration claim is not made within the period provided for in sub-paragraph (a) of that paragraph the appropriate Minister may give a direction for the enforcement of the effect of the person’s immigration designation. 2 On consideration of an immigration claim, the appropriate Minister may decide— a to approve the claim in whole or in part; b so far as it is not approved, to refuse the claim. 3 A decision to approve an immigration claim is to be treated as a decision under the Immigration Acts. Effect of approval of an immigration claim 5 If the appropriate Minister approves an immigration claim, the notice of the decision must state whether the person concerned is to be treated, for the purposes of section 8B of the 1971 Act, as— a a person falling within sub-paragraph (i) of subsection (5A)(a) of that section; b a person falling within sub-paragraph (ii) of that provision, or c a person falling within each of those sub-paragraphs. Treatment of refusal of immigration claim etc. 6 1 A decision to refuse an immigration claim is to be treated as if it were a decision of the Secretary of State appealable under section 82(1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 . 2 So far as the claim was based on representations concerning a breach of the United Kingdom’s obligations under the Human Rights Convention , the appeal is to be treated as an appeal under section 82(1)(b) of that Act. 3 So far as the claim was based on representations concerning a breach of United Kingdom’s obligations under the Refugee Convention it is to be treated as an appeal under section 82(1)(a) of that Act. 4 A decision under regulation 4(1) to give a direction for the enforcement of the effect of an immigration designation is to be treated as if it were a decision of the Secretary of State appealable under section 82(1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. 5 If a decision is treated as an appealable decision as a result of paragraph (1) or (4) and the person concerned was lawfully in the United Kingdom at the time of the immigration designation, that person may not be required to leave or be removed from the United Kingdom before the expiry of the period within which an appeal may be instituted (ignoring any possibility of an appeal out of time with permission). Modification of Part 5 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 7 For the purposes of an appeal under section 82(1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 by virtue of these Regulations, section 85 of that Act (matters to be considered) has effect as if, after subsection (6), there were inserted the following subsections— 7 Nothing in subsection (4) permits the Tribunal to consider the validity of a decision to make or vary, or to refuse to revoke or vary, the immigration designation of an appellant. 8 In subsection (7) “immigration designation” has the meaning given in section 48(1) of the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018. . Immigration appeals and court reviews under section 38 of the 2018 Act 8 1 For the purposes of proceedings on an application under section 38 of the 2018 Act, the High Court, or Court of Session in Scotland, is— a not to consider any matter concerning or arising from a decision on an immigration claim which has been or could be raised on an appeal which is pending or could be instituted under section 82 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 by virtue of these Regulations; and b bound by any determination disposing of such an appeal. 2 For the purposes of paragraph (1), the question of whether an appeal is pending is to be determined in accordance with section 104 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 . Chris Philp Parliamentary Under Secretary of State Home Office