Defence PART 1 General Citation and commencement 1 These Rules may be cited as the Court Martial and Service Civilian Court (Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999) Rules 2009 and shall come into force on 31st October 2009. Application 2 These Rules apply to any proceedings before the Court Martial and the Service Civilian Court. Interpretation 3 1 In these Rules— “the 1999 Act ” means the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999; “the 2006 Act ” means the Armed Forces Act 2006; “ Court Martial Rules ” means the Armed Forces (Court Martial) Rules 2009 ; “ SCC Rules ” means the Armed Forces (Service Civilian Court) Rules 2009 ; “defendant”— in relation to proceedings before the Court Martial, means a person against whom a charge regarded for the purposes of Part 5 of the 2006 Act as allocated for Court Martial trial has been brought; in relation to proceedings before the Service Civilian Court, means a person against whom a charge regarded for the purposes of Part 5 of the 2006 Act as allocated for Service Civilian Court trial has been brought; in relation to appellate proceedings within the meaning of Court Martial Rules, means the appellant; “ the Director ” means the Director of Service Prosecutions; “the judge advocate”— in relation to any proceedings before the Court Martial, means the judge advocate specified for the proceedings under section 155(5) of the 2006 Act; in relation to any proceedings before the Service Civilian Court, means the judge advocate specified for the proceedings under section 278(2) of the 2006 Act; “legal representative”— in relation to proceedings before the Court Martial, means a person appointed under rule 39 of the Court Martial Rules; in relation to proceedings before the Service Civilian Court, means a person appointed under rule 26 of the SCC Rules. 2 A reference in these Rules to proceedings— a in relation to proceedings before the Court Martial, has the same meaning as in Part 1 of the Court Martial Rules; b in relation to proceedings before the Service Civilian Court, has the same meaning as in Part 1 of the SCC Rules. 3 A reference in these Rules to a party to any proceedings— a in relation to proceedings before the Court Martial, has the same meaning as in Part 1 of the Court Martial Rules; b in relation to proceedings before the Service Civilian Court, has the same meaning as in Part 1 of the SCC Rules. PART 2 Restriction on cross-examination by a defendant acting in person Application for direction prohibiting defendant from cross-examining witness in person 4 1 Subject to paragraph (8)(a), an application by the Director for the judge advocate to give a direction under section 36 of the 1999 Act in relation to any witness must be sent to the court administration officer and at the same time a copy of the application must be sent by the applicant to every other party to the proceedings. 2 In his application the Director must state why, in his opinion— a the evidence given by the witness is likely to be diminished if cross-examination is undertaken by the defendant in person; b the evidence would be improved if a direction were given under section 36(2) of the 1999 Act; and c it would not be contrary to the interests of justice to give such a direction. 3 On receipt of the application the court administration officer must refer it to the judge advocate. 4 Where a copy of the application is received by a party to the proceedings more than 14 days before the date set for the trial to begin, that party may make observations in writing on the application to the court administration officer, but any such observations must be made within 14 days of the receipt of the application and be copied to the other parties to the proceedings. 5 A party to whom an application is sent in accordance with paragraph (1) who wishes to oppose the application must give his reasons for doing so to the court administration officer and the other parties to the proceedings. 6 Those reasons must be notified— a within 14 days of the date the application was served on him, if that date is more than 14 days before the date set for the trial to begin; b if the trial has begun, in accordance with any directions issued by the judge advocate; or c if neither sub-paragraph (a) nor sub-paragraph (b) apply, before the date set for the trial to begin. 7 Where the application made in accordance with paragraph (1) is made before the date set for the trial to begin and— a is not contested by any party to the proceedings, the judge advocate may determine the application without a hearing; b is contested by a party to the proceedings, the judge advocate must direct a hearing of the application. 8 Where the application is made after the trial has begun— a the application may be made orally; and b the judge advocate may give such directions as he considers appropriate to deal with the application. 9 Where a hearing of the application is to take place, the court administration officer must notify each party to the proceedings of the time and place of the hearing. 10 A party notified in accordance with paragraph (9) may be present at the hearing and be heard. 11 The court administration officer must, as soon as possible after the determination of an application made in accordance with paragraph (1), give notice of the decision and the reasons for it to all the parties to the proceedings. 12 A person making an oral application under paragraph (8)(a) must— a give reasons why the application was not made before the trial commenced; and b provide the judge advocate with the information set out in paragraph (2). Restrictions on cross-examination of witness 5 1 This rule and rules 6 and 7 apply where a defendant is prevented from cross-examining a witness in person by virtue of section 34, 35 or a direction under section 36 of the 1999 Act. 2 The judge advocate must explain to the defendant, as early in the proceedings as is reasonably practicable, that he— a is prevented from cross-examining a witness in person; and b should arrange for a legal representative to act for him for the purpose of cross-examining the witness. 3 The defendant must notify the court administration officer within 7 days of the judge advocate giving his explanation, or within such other period as the judge advocate may in any particular case allow, of the action, if any, he has taken. 4 Where he has arranged for a legal representative to act for him, the notification must include details of the name and address of the representative. 5 The notification must be in writing. 6 The court administration officer must notify all other parties to the proceedings of the name and address of the person, if any, appointed to act for the defendant. 7 Where the judge advocate gives his explanation under paragraph (2) to the defendant either within 7 days of the day set for the commencement of any hearing at which a witness in respect of whom a prohibition under section 34, 35 or a direction under section 36 of the 1999 Act applies may be cross-examined or after such a hearing has commenced, the period of 7 days shall be reduced in accordance with any directions issued by the judge advocate. 8 Where at the end of the period of 7 days or such other period as the judge advocate has allowed, the court administration officer has received no notification from the defendant, the judge advocate may grant the defendant an extension of time, whether on his own motion or on the application of the defendant. 9 Before granting an extension of time, the judge advocate may hold a hearing at which all the parties to the proceedings may attend and be heard. 10 Any extension of time shall be of such period as the judge advocate considers appropriate in the circumstances of the case. 11 The decision of the judge advocate as to whether to grant the defendant an extension of time must be notified to all the parties to the proceedings by the court administration officer. Appointment of legal representative by the judge advocate 6 1 Where the judge advocate decides, in accordance with section 38(4) of the 1999 Act, to appoint a legal representative, the court administration officer must notify all the parties to the proceedings of the name and address of the representative. 2 An appointment made by the judge advocate under section 38(4) of the 1999 Act shall, except to such extent as the judge advocate may in any particular case determine, terminate at the conclusion of the cross-examination of the witness or witnesses in respect of whom a prohibition under section 34, 35 or a direction under section 36 of the 1999 Act applies. Appointment arranged by the defendant 7 1 The defendant may arrange for the legal representative, appointed by the judge advocate under section 38(4) of the 1999 Act, to be appointed to act for him for the purpose of cross-examining any witness in respect of whom a prohibition under section 34, 35 or a direction under section 36 of the 1999 Act applies. 2 Where such an appointment is made— a both the defendant and the legal representative appointed must notify the court of the appointment; and b the legal representative must, from the time of his appointment, act for the defendant as though the arrangement had been made under section 38(2)(a) of the 1999 Act and shall cease to be the representative of the court under section 38(4) of the 1999 Act. 3 Where the court receives notification of the appointment either from the legal representative or from the defendant but not from both, the judge advocate must investigate whether the appointment has been made, and if he concludes that the appointment has not been made, paragraph (2)(b) shall not apply. 4 A defendant may, notwithstanding an appointment by the judge advocate under section 38(4) of the 1999 Act, arrange for a legal representative to act for him for the purpose of cross-examining any witness in respect of whom a prohibition under section 34, 35 or a direction under section 36 of the 1999 Act applies. 5 Where the defendant arranges for, or informs the court of his intention to arrange for, a legal representative to act for him, he must notify the court, within such period as the judge advocate may allow, of the name and address of any person appointed to act for him. 6 Where the court is notified within the time allowed that such an appointment has been made, any legal representative appointed by the judge advocate in accordance with section 38(4) of the 1999 Act shall be discharged. 7 The court administration officer must, as soon as reasonably practicable after the court receives notification of an appointment under this rule or, where paragraph (3) applies, after the judge advocate is satisfied that the appointment has been made, notify all the parties to the proceedings— a that the appointment has been made; b where the defendant has arranged for a legal representative to act for him in accordance with paragraph (4), of the name and address of that legal representative; and c that the person appointed by the judge advocate under section 38(4) of the 1999 Act has been discharged or has ceased to act for the court. PART 3 Evidence of a complainant’s previous sexual behaviour Evidence of a complainant’s previous sexual behaviour 8 1 An application for leave under section 41(2) of the 1999 Act must, except where paragraph (13) applies, be made in writing to the court administration officer and must— a in relation to proceedings before the Court Martial, either— i be received by that officer within 28 days of— aa that officer giving notice in writing of the time and place appointed for the hearing of the proceedings in accordance with Court Martial Rules, or bb the lodging of a notice of appeal against conviction or sentence by the Service Civilian Court in accordance with Court Martial Rules, or within such period as the judge advocate may in any particular case determine; or ii be accompanied by a full written explanation specifying the reasons why the application could not have been made within the 28 days mentioned above; b in relation to proceedings before the Service Civilian Court, either— i be received by that officer within 28 days of that officer giving notice in writing of the time and place appointed for the hearing of the proceedings in accordance with SCC Rules or within such period as the judge advocate may in any particular case determine; or ii be accompanied by a full written explanation specifying the reasons why the application could not have been made within the 28 days mentioned above. 2 Such an application must— a identify the issue to which the defendant says the complainant’s sexual behaviour is relevant; b give particulars of— i any evidence that the defendant wants to introduce; and ii any questions that the defendant wants to ask; c identify the exception to the prohibition in section 41 of the 1999 Act on which the defendant relies; and d give the name and date of birth of any witness whose evidence about the complainant’s sexual behaviour the defendant wants to introduce. 3 A copy of the application must be sent to all the other parties to the proceedings at the same time as it is sent to the court administration officer. 4 Where a copy of the application is received by the Director more than 14 days before the date set for the trial to begin, the Director must, within 14 days of the receipt of the application, notify the other parties to the proceedings and the court administration officer in writing whether or not— a he opposes the application, giving reasons for any such opposition; and b he wishes to be represented at any hearing of the application. 5 Where a copy of the application is received by a party to the proceedings other than the Director more than 14 days before the date set for the trial to begin, that party may make observations in writing on the application to the court administration officer, but any such observations must be made within 14 days of the receipt of the application and be copied to the other parties to the proceedings. 6 In considering any application under this rule, the judge advocate may request a party to the proceedings to provide him with such information as he may specify and which he considers would assist him in determining the application. 7 Where the judge advocate makes such a request, the person required to provide the information must do so within 14 days of the judge advocate making the request or by such time as the judge advocate considers appropriate in the circumstances of the case. 8 An application under paragraph (1) must be determined by the judge advocate following a hearing if— a the Director has notified the court administration officer that he opposes the application; or b the copy of the application was received by any of the parties to the proceedings less than 14 days before the date set for the trial to begin. 9 An application under paragraph (1) must be determined by the judge advocate following a hearing in any case where he considers such a hearing is appropriate in the circumstances of the particular case. 10 The date and time of the hearing must be— a determined by the judge advocate after taking into consideration— i any time which a party to the proceedings has been given to respond to a request for information; and ii the date fixed for any other hearing relevant to the proceedings; and b notified by the court administration officer to all the parties to the proceedings. 11 Except where paragraph (8) or (9) applies, an application under paragraph (1) must be determined by the judge advocate without a hearing. 12 The court administration officer must, as soon as possible after the determination of an application made in accordance with paragraph (1), give notice of the decision and the reasons for it to all the parties to the proceedings. 13 An application for leave under section 41(2) of the 1999 Act may be made orally where the application is made after the trial has begun. 14 The person making the application under paragraph (13) must— a give reasons why the applicant failed to make the application in writing in accordance with paragraph (1); and b provide the judge advocate with the information set out in paragraph (2)(a) to (2)(d). PART 4 Restrictions on reporting Application for a reporting direction under section 46(6) of the 1999 Act 9 1 An application for a reporting direction made by a party to any proceedings, in relation to a witness in those proceedings, must be made in writing or orally under rule 11. 2 A written application for a reporting direction must include the following information— a name, address and date of birth of the witness (or the reason for not giving these details); b brief details of the charges to which the application applies; c the grounds on which the applicant asserts that, if the direction is not given— i the quality of the evidence given by the witness, or ii the level of co-operation given by the witness to any party to the proceedings in the preparation of that party’s case, is likely to be diminished by fear or distress if the witness is identified by members of the public as a witness in the proceedings; d whether the application needs to be determined urgently, and if so why and by when; e why a reporting direction— i is in the interests of justice; and ii is in the public interest in avoiding the imposition of a substantial and unreasonable restriction on the reporting of proceedings. 3 If an application for a reporting direction is made in writing, the applicant must— a send it to the court administration officer; and b at the same time, send copies of it to every other party to the proceedings. Opposing an application for a reporting direction 10 1 If an application for a reporting direction is made in writing, any party to the proceedings who wishes to oppose that application must notify the applicant and the court administration officer in writing of his opposition and give reasons for it. 2 A person opposing an application must state in the written notification whether he disputes that the— a witness is eligible for protection under section 46 of the 1999 Act; or b granting of protection would be likely to improve the quality of the evidence given by the witness or the level of co-operation given by the witness to any party to the proceedings in connection with that party’s preparation of its case. 3 The notification under paragraph (1) must be given within 5 working days of the date the application was served on him unless an extension of time is granted under rule 14. Urgent action on an application under section 46(6) of the 1999 Act 11 1 The judge advocate may give a reporting direction under section 46 of the 1999 Act in relation to a witness in those proceedings, notwithstanding that no written application has been made under rule 9 or that the 5 working days specified in rule 10(3) have not expired if an application is made to him under this rule. 2 Any party to the proceedings may make the application under paragraph (1) whether or not an application has already been made under rule 9. 3 An application under paragraph (1) may be made orally or in writing. 4 If an application is made orally, the judge advocate may hear and take into account representations made to him by any person who in his view has a legitimate interest in the application before him. 5 The application must specify the exceptional circumstances on which the application relies. Application for an excepting direction under section 46(9) of the 1999 Act 12 1 An application for an excepting direction under section 46(9) of the 1999 Act (a direction dispensing with restrictions imposed by a reporting direction) may be made by— a a party to those proceedings; or b any person who, although not a party to the proceedings, is directly affected by a reporting restriction given in relation to a witness in those proceedings. 2 If an application for an excepting direction is made, the applicant must state why— a the effect of a reporting direction imposed places a substantial and unreasonable restriction on the reporting of the proceedings; and b it is in the public interest to remove or relax those restrictions. 3 An application for an excepting direction may be made— a in writing, pursuant to paragraph (4), at any time after the commencement of the proceedings in the court; or b orally, at a hearing of an application for a reporting direction. 4 A written application for an excepting direction must include the following information— a name, address and date of birth of the witness (or the reason for not giving these details); b brief details of the charges to which the application applies; c the extent to which the applicant invites the court to dispense with the restrictions imposed by the reporting direction; d why— i the reporting direction is or would be a substantial and unreasonable restriction on the reporting of proceedings and it is in the public interest to remove or relax that restriction; or ii it would be in the interests of justice to do so; e if an applicant is not a party to the proceedings, state why he is directly affected by a reporting direction given in relation to a witness in those proceedings. 5 If an application for an excepting direction is made in writing, the applicant must— a send it to the court administration officer; and b at the same time, send copies to every party to the proceedings. 6 Any person served with a copy of an application for an excepting direction who wishes to oppose it, must notify the applicant and court administration officer in writing of his opposition and give reasons for it. 7 The notification under paragraph (6) must be given within 5 working days of the date the application was served on him unless an extension of time is granted under rule 14. Variation or revocation of a reporting or excepting direction 13 1 An application to— a revoke a reporting direction, or b vary or revoke an excepting direction, may be made at any time after the commencement of the proceedings in the court. 2 An application under paragraph (1) may be made by a party to the proceedings in which the direction was issued, or by a person who, although not a party to those proceedings, is in the opinion of the judge advocate directly affected by the direction. 3 An application under paragraph (1) must be made in writing and the applicant must send that application to the court administration officer, and at the same time copies of the application shall be sent to every party or, as the case may be, every other party to the proceedings. 4 The applicant must set out in his application the reasons why he seeks to have the direction varied or, as the case may be, revoked. 5 Any person served with a copy of an application who wishes to oppose it, must notify the applicant and the court administration officer in writing of his opposition and give reasons for it. 6 Any notification under paragraph (5) must be given within 5 working days of the date the application was served on him unless an extension of time is granted under rule 14. Application for an extension of time 14 1 An application may be made in writing to extend the period of time for notification under rule 10(3), rule 12(7) or rule 13(6) before that period has expired. 2 An application must be accompanied by a statement setting out the reasons why the applicant is unable to give notification within that period. 3 An application must be sent to the court administration officer and a copy of the application must be sent at the same time to the applicant. Decision of the judge advocate 15 1 The judge advocate may— a determine any application made under rule 9 and rules 11 to 14 without a hearing; or b direct a hearing of any application. 2 The court administration officer must notify all the parties of the judge advocate’s decision as soon as reasonably practicable. 3 If a hearing of an application is to take place, the court administration officer must notify each party to the proceedings of the time and place of the hearing. 4 The judge advocate may hear and take into account representations made to him by any person who in the judge advocate’s view has a legitimate interest in the application before him. PART 5 Revocations Revocations 16 1 The Courts-Martial (Royal Navy, Army and Royal Air Force) (Evidence) Rules 2006 are revoked to the extent that they are not otherwise revoked by the repeal of section 103 of the Army Act 1955 , section 103 of the Air Force Act 1955 or section 58 of the Naval Discipline Act 1957 . 2 The Standing Civilian Courts (Evidence) Rules 2006 are revoked to the extent that they are not otherwise revoked by the repeal of paragraph 12 of Schedule 3 to the Armed Forces Act 1976 . Kevan Jones Parliamentary Under Secretary of State Ministry of Defence 30th July 2009