SHERIFF COURT, SCOTLAND Citation and commencement 1 1 This Act of Sederunt may be cited as the Act of Sederunt (Solicitor and Client Accounts in the Sheriff Court) 1992 and shall come into operation on 20th July 1992. 2 This Act of Sederunt shall be inserted in the Books of Sederunt. Remit of solicitor’s account for taxation 2 1 Subject to section 61A(1) of the Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980( ), the sheriff may remit the account of a solicitor to his client to the Auditor of Court for taxation. 2 Where a remit is made under sub-paragraph (1)— a the solicitor shall, within 21 days, lodge with the Auditor the account, which shall be in such form as shall enable the Auditor readily to establish the nature and extent of the work done to which the account relates and shall detail the outlays incurred by the solicitor, together with such supporting material as is necessary to vouch the items on the account; b the Auditor shall assign a diet of taxation not earlier than fourteen days from the date he receives the account and intimate that diet forthwith to the solicitor; c the solicitor shall then, forthwith, send by first class recorded delivery post a copy of the account lodged to the client (if such a copy has not already been sent to the client) and give notice in terms of Form A in the Schedule to this Act of Sederunt, of the date, time and place of the taxation to the client; d the Auditor shall report his decision to the court and shall forthwith send a copy of his report to the solicitor and to the client; and e the solicitor or the client may, provided that he or his representative has attended at the diet of taxation, lodge a note of reasoned objections to the report within seven days from the date of the report, and the sheriff shall dispose of such objections in a summary manner, with or without answers. Taxation of litigation account 3 1 Where the Auditor taxes the account of a solicitor to his client in respect of the conduct of a litigation on behalf of the client, he— a shall allow a sum in respect of such work and outlays as have been reasonably incurred; b shall allow in respect of each item of work and outlay such sum as may be fair and reasonable having regard to all the circumstances of the case; c shall, in determining whether a sum charged in respect of an item of work is fair and reasonable, take into account— i the complexity of the litigation and the number, difficulty or novelty of the questions raised; ii the skill, labour, specialised knowledge and responsibility involved; iii the time spent on the item of work and on the litigation as a whole; iv the number and importance of any documents or other papers prepared or perused without regard to length; v the place where and the circumstances (including the degree of expedition required) in which the solicitor’s work or any part of it has been done; vi the amount or value of any money or property involved in the litigation; and vii the importance of the litigation or its subject matter to the client; d shall presume (unless the contrary is demonstrated to his satisfaction) that— i an item of work or outlay was reasonably incurred if it was incurred with the express or implied approval of the client; ii the fee charged in respect of an item of work or outlay was reasonable if the amount of the fee or the outlay was expressly or impliedly approved by the client; and iii an item of work or outlay was not reasonably incurred, or that the fee charged in respect of an item of work or outlay was not reasonable if the item of work, outlay or fee charged, was unusual in the circumstances of the case, unless the solicitor informed the client prior to carrying out the item of work or incurring the outlay that it might not be allowed (or that the fee charged might not be allowed in full) in a taxation in judicial proceedings between party and party; and e may disallow any item of work or outlay which is not vouched to his satisfaction. Amendment of Act of Sederunt (Fees of Solicitors in the Sheriff Court) 1989 4 1 The Schedule to the Act of Sederunt (Fees of Solicitors in the Sheriff Court) 1989( ) shall be amended in accordance with the following sub-paragraphs. 2 In paragraph 1 of the General Regulations omit the words “(a) solicitor and client, client paying, (b) solicitor and client, third party paying and (c)”. 3 In paragraph 2 of the General Regulations omit the words “as between party and party”. 4 In paragraph 5(b) of the General Regulations omit the words from “Where such an increase” to “against his own client.” 5 In paragraph 7 of the General Regulations omit— a the words “in accounts as between party and party” where they occur in the first sentence; and b the words from “In accounts” to the end of the paragraph. 6 In paragraph 8 of the General Regulations omit the words “between party and party”. 7 In paragraph 12 of the General Regulations omit the words “as between party and party”. J.A.D. Hope Lord President, IPD Edinburgh 16th June 1992