user: Input: The range has been created by Australian brand Black Milk Clothing. The collection is called 'Princesses and Villains' Clothing inspired by iconic films Snow White,. Alice in Wonderland, Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast, The Little. Mermaid and Sleeping Beauty.
Output: Ever want to release your inner princess but feel restricted by the latest trends on the high street? Well now you can let your sparkly self go with this new range of fairytale fashioned clothing. The collection has been created by Australian fashion brand Black Milk Clothing and is inspired by some of Disney’s most iconic films including Snow White, Alice in Wonderland, Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast, The Little Mermaid and Sleeping Beauty. In the eye-catching advertising campaign the models sport Disney-inspired hair, including Snow White's black bob, Ariel's bright red locks  and Sleeping Beauty's tumbling blonde curls. Black Milk Clothing has designed a clothing line based on the princesses and villains of Disney's most popular cartoons. In the eye-catching advertising campaign the models sport Disney-inspired hair and make-up. A model wears a magical-looking skater dress featuring Cinderella. For girls wanting to channel Ariel the Little Mermaid the collection includes dresses, tops and leggings in glitzy green lycra with a scaly design. If you're more of a Snow White kind of girl there's a bright blue body inspired by the heroine, which comes with matching yellow mini or maxi skirts. And for fans of the more traditional girlie look, there are dresses emblazoned with sparkly princesses in puffy sleeves and perfectly coiffed hair. But don't expect fairytale modesty from the designs themselves. Slash-front swimsuits, barely-there minis and skin-tight lycra add a dash of daring to the princess theme. So. what's the cost of looking like a princess? Dresses and printed. leggings sell for around $85 AUD (£50), jackets for $110 AUD (£65) and. tops for $45 AUD (£25). Fans of the Ariel the Little Mermaid can choose a scaly, metallic green dress or matching leggings. The Snow White body comes with a matching mini or maxi skirt. Dresses and printed leggings sell for around $85 AUD (£50) The collection, aptly named 'Princesses and Villains', also contains pieces featuring the dark side of Disney. One jacket has the Evil Queen from Snow White on the back with the slogan, 'Don't be scared' beneath. Black Milk was started at founder James Lillis' kitchen table in 2009 and now has over 150 employees. But this is their first range that has been officially licensed by Disney, according to the brand. The Brisbane-based label, which ships globally for free, has become known for its quirky style and has captured the attention of fashion fans across the globe, now attracting one million followers on Instagram. The more racy designs include a mini dress in Cinderella blue (left) and a slash-front swimming costume with an Alice in Wonderland design (right) The Brisbane-based label has over one million followers on Instagram.

Input: James Bowes, 30, gave the Sunday tabloid a story about Princess Tiaamii. He revealed how child protection officers went to Peter Andre's home. He later sold information to The Sun about a child who was bitten by a fox.
Output: Jailed: Former Sussex Police sergeant James Bowes arrives at the Old Bailey today where he was sentenced to 10 months behind bars. A former police sergeant has been jailed for 10 months for trying to sell a story about celebrity Katie Price's daughter to the News of the World. James Bowes, 30, contacted the now. defunct Sunday tabloid newspaper and told a journalist that police child. protection officers had gone to the home of Price's former husband. Peter Andre in Brighton. This followed a report that the couple's daughter, Princess Tiaamii, then aged two, had been injured in 2010, the Old Bailey heard. The team found no untoward injuries to the child and the matter was not taken further, the court was told. But Bowes, who worked for in Brighton for Sussex Police, emailed the newspaper asking for money for the information. The story was printed with information from another source and Bowes was never paid. Bowes, 30, from Steyning, West Sussex, pleaded guilty last month to misconduct in public office. The court heard that he passed information to the Sun newspaper about a child who was bitten by a fox and was paid £500. And he passed on details of a psychic who had contacted police about a search for bodies in two former Brighton homes in 2010 of serial killer Peter Tobin, but was not paid. Bowes was charged by officers from Operation Elveden, the Metropolitan Police investigation into police corruption. The former officer, from Steyning, West Sussex, admitted a single count of misconduct in public office at an earlier hearing. Mr Justice Fulford told Bowes: 'You have made available to the press confidential information concerning children. 'Your explanation is that it was a foolish attempt by you to be in some part associated with notorious or high-profile cases.' Bowes had abused his position of trust and undermined the relationship the police had with the public. Jailed police officer: He admitted selling stories about the daughter of Katie Price and Peter Andre. Stephen Wedd, defending, said Bowes had now given £500 to the Crimestoppers charity, and had been dismissed by Sussex Police. Mark Bryant-Heron, prosecuting, told. the court that Bowes had access to the police computer to get. information about the three reports in 2010. Andre and Price had separated and there was a report of injuries to the couple's daughter. 'The child protection team established no untoward injuries,' said Mr Bryant-Heron. The following day Bowes emailed the News of the World news desk but was told that the newspaper already had the information. Jailed: The former sergeant was brought before the courts after being arrested under Operation Elveden which is the Metropolitan Police's probe into corrupt payments to officials. 'Clearly, the News of the World had access to other sources for information,' he added. Bowes had emailed the Sun after a fox. attacked a child at a birthday party and was paid after providing the. contact details of the parents. The father told the court he had to move his family away from their home until the fuss died down after the story was printed. Bowes also contacted the newspaper about the psychic who was later contacted by a journalist. No story was published and Bowes was not paid, but the psychic said she had lost confidence in the police. Operation Elveden is the Met's probe. into corrupt payments to officials and has 70 police officers. investigating and has cost £5million to date.

Input: The White House says it doesn't take the Iranian claim seriously. A Pentagon spokesman questions Iran's naval capability. Miltiary experts say Iran is incapable of deploying ships off the U.S. coast. State-run news agency says there will be a "powerful presence" near U.S. borders.
Output:

assistant: The White House on Wednesday dismissed an Iranian threat to deploy warships near the U.S. coast, and military experts said Iran lacks the naval capability to do so. Overnight Tuesday, Iranian state news quoted a commander as saying his country plans to have a "powerful presence" near the U.S. border. In response, White House spokesman Jay Carney said that "we don't take these statements seriously, given that they do not reflect at all Iran's naval capabilities." Pentagon spokesman George Little echoed Carney's point, saying Iran has the right to send vessels into international waters, but "whether they can truly project naval power beyond the region is another question." "I wouldn't read too much into what came out of Iran today," Little said, adding: "I think what is said and what is actually done can be two different things." State-run Press TV in Iran said similar plans were announced in July. However, no Iranian warships ever deployed. In February, two Iranian navy vessels traversed the Suez Canal in the first such voyage by Iranian ships since 1979. Richard Herrmann, director of the Mershon Center for International Security Studies at The Ohio State University, said Iran's navy is too small with too miniscule a budget to remain for long off the U.S. coast. "This is hard to take seriously, because Iran's navy is very small. This force, whatever it may be, is going to be puny, especially compared to the U.S. Navy," said Herrmann, who specializes in the use of imagery and posturing in international conflicts. "Iran doesn't have the capability to come within close proximity to (the United States) to conduct hostile activities. Even if (Iran) launched missiles, we would sink their ships immediately." Iran lacks battleships or aircraft carriers. Its forces are capable of patrolling the Persian Gulf and sailing a short distance in the Indian Ocean, Herrmann said, but keeping ships stationed near the United States, so far from Iran, would be too expensive for the government. "They would need a place to resupply, refuel, restock crews with food and water. They couldn't afford that unless they got help," Herrmann said.  "I would imagine they could get help from somewhere in South America, maybe Venezuela." Venezuela and Iran are allied by their anti-U.S. sentiments. Michael Connell, the director of the Iranian studies program at CNA, a Washington-area think tank that specializes in naval analyses, agreed with Herrmann. "Their navy can't reach our coastline right now," Connell said, describing the Iranian announcement as "bombastic rhetoric." "It's posturing" by Iran intended for both its domestic and regional audience, Connell said. Making such pronouncements projects a dominant role including naval power, whether or not they can back it up, he added. "The Iranians have been historically annoyed that we have a naval presence in the Persian Gulf, which is kind of their backyard," Connell said. The worst move the United States could make now would be to overreact, said John Mueller, the Woody Hayes chair of national security studies at Mershon. "Hopefully this won't play into (American) neo-cons who are itching for a war with Iran," he said. "The best thing to do is ignore it and treat it with the contempt it deserves. If Iran wants to waste their time and money on a dwindling supply of fuel (to keep ships) bobbing around in the Atlantic Ocean, then let them." The idea of Iran moving ships near the U.S. coast is not on par with the Soviet Union flying planes off the coast of Alaska during the Cold War, Mueller noted. The Soviets' move was legal, and was considered a gesture intended to irritate the United States, he said. "Those were different circumstances and different players," Mueller added. Herrmann cautioned that while moving ships near the U.S. coast may not be a real threat, Iran is certainly capable of harming the United States -- but closer to Iran. Iran could attack U.S. ships in the Strait of Hormuz, a waterway between the Gulf of Oman and the Persian Gulf, on the south coast of Iran. Such attacks could disrupt oil markets and scare American tourists, Herrmann said.