user: Q: TEXT: Three Muslim children have been sent to school with 'Halal only' badges taped to their uniforms after one of them was served non-Halal food in the canteen on 'eight or nine occasions'. Khadija Khan, five, has been given non-Halal food by staff at Woodside Academy in Bradford, West Yorkshire, numerous times despite her parents writing to the school to express their beliefs. Her mother, Henna Khan, 29, has now decided to take matters into her own hands and said she has taped the stickers to her children's uniforms in 'protest'. Scroll down for video. Henna Khan, 29, has sent her three children (from left: Mohammed Talib, four, Khadija Khan, five, and Tayyeba Khan, three) to school with 'Halal only' badges after her eldest daughter was given non-Halal food several times. Mrs Khan, 29, said she will continue to send her children to school with the badges 'for as long as it takes' The mother (pictured with her children) said her eldest child has been given non-halal food numerous times. She said she will continue to send Khadija and her other children, four-year-old Mohammed Talib and three-year-old Tayyeba, to school with the notices 'for as long as it takes'. She said: 'I really didn't know what to do anymore. 'We have counted this happening on eight or nine occasions. They have only been attending Woodside Academy for over a year and a half now and yet this has happened a good few times. 'My children are not the only pupils who eat halal food, which makes me wonder how many others have been given meals by mistake? What if they had allergies? 'The signs are the only way, other than a packed lunch, that I know my children will not be given non-Halal meals. 'The "Halal only" signs on the uniforms are a protest by me and my children, which is what I told the head teacher and that it will continue for as long as it takes.' Mrs Khan said: ''The "Halal only" signs on the uniforms are a protest by me and my children' Woodside Academy in Bradford, West Yorkshire (pictured), has apologised to the family and said an investigation had been launched to establish why the mistakes with the school dinners had occurred. Mrs Khan and her husband Talib Hussain, 38, said they took action after losing confidence in the school's ability to prevent the dishes being served to their children. They said they wrote to the school and even went in to see staff on a number of occasions last year when Khadija was served non-Halal food for her school dinner. Halal slaughtering involves cutting through the large arteries in the neck with one swipe of a blade, while a Muslim butcher recites a religious verse. All blood is then drained away since the consumption of blood is forbidden under Islamic law. Under Islamic law, an animal must be slaughtered by having its throat cut while it is conscious. In comparison, the non-halal method involves taking animals to an abattoir where they are stunned before being killed. It means the animal is unconscious when it is killed and has an instantaneous death, as opposed to enduring what animal rights activists claim is drawn-out pain and suffering. Once the animal has been killed at the abattoir, it is removed and taken to be hung and butchered. On one occasion, it was her younger brother, Mohammed, who pointed out the mistake and the meal was switched. However, they said the breaking point came last week when the schoolgirl was again given non-halal food. They said their daughter has regularly been offered ham and crackers in the classroom and sent home with a bag of jelly sweets, which contain gelatine that is banned under Halal rules. Both parents said that because their children are so young, they sometimes struggle to differentiate between halal and non-halal food, meaning they have to put their faith in the school to provide the correct option. The school, which is an independently-run academy, is provided the food by Bradford Council, where meals are prepared off-site and separated for different dietary requirements. Staff at the school are informed about which pupils should be given the specially prepared meals. Woodside Academy apologised to the family and said an investigation had been launched to establish why the mistakes have occurred. Mrs Khan said: 'Every time we complained to the school they say they are going to look into why this is happening, yet these mistakes keep happening. 'I asked them does this happen to any of the other children, which they replied no. The concerned mother said her eldest daughter (centre) had been given non-Halal food up to 'nine times' It is against Muslim belief to eat non-Halal meat, which is slaughtered in a different way to Halal (file picture) 'This made me question whether someone is doing this on purpose. It has been quite stressful for us since we have moved to the area and I have even been to see the head teacher in tears. 'We have never had any problems with the school and the kids all do well here. They just need to give the right meals to the right children.' The family also complained to Bradford Council, who sent a letter informing them that staff would be given Halal awareness training. A spokesman for Woodside Academy said they regretted the incident and confirmed they are liaising with the Bradford Council to undertake an investigation into their procedures.
A: Highlights: Henna Khan has sent her three children to school with 'Halal only' badges. She took action after Woodside Academy in Bradford kept serving non-Halal. The mother, 29, said the homemade badges on their uniforms are a 'protest' Woodside Academy apologised and said an investigation had been launched.

Q: TEXT: Three men were found guilty of plotting a terror attack they hoped would be bigger than the July 7, 2005, bombings that rocked London, UK prosecutors said Thursday. Ashik Ali, Ifran Khalid and Ifran Naseer, all from Birmingham, England, were convicted at Woolwich Crown Court on 12 counts of committing acts in preparation for a terrorist attack. The three men planned to set off up to eight backpack bombs in crowded areas, and had traveled to a terror training camp in Pakistan for expert training and preparation, the court heard during a 14-week trial. "Had they not been stopped, the consequences would have been catastrophic," said Karen Jones, a specialist counter-terrorism prosecutor for the Crown Prosecution Service. "These men had dangerous aspirations." While their precise targets remained unclear, "the potential for damage and loss of life from their plot should not be underestimated," Jones added. "The evidence we put to the court showed the defendants discussing with awe and admiration the attacks of 9/11 and 7/7. These terrorists wanted to do something bigger, speaking of how 7/7 had 'gone a bit wrong.'" West Midlands Police said Naseer, 31, talked of "spilling so much blood you'll have nightmares for the rest of your lives." The three men posed as bogus charity collectors within their local community to raise money to fund their plans, the police statement said. Naseer was also found guilty of helping four younger men travel to the terror training camp after he, Khalid and Ali, both 27, returned from Pakistan, it said. "The link to training camps demonstrates the international dimension of the threat we continue to face," said West Midlands Police Assistant Chief Constable Marcus Beale. "The numbers involved in terrorism are small but the potential impact they could have if successful is huge." The men are due to be sentenced later this year. The judge told them all to expect life sentences with substantial minimum terms, the police statement said. The July 7, 2005 bombings in London, which targeted buses and the subway, killed 52 people and injured more than 700. CNN's Stephanie Halasz contributed to this report.
A:

assistant: Highlights: NEW: The 3 men planned to detonate backpack bombs in crowded areas, the court heard. NEW: They traveled to Pakistan to attend a terror training camp. Ashik Ali, Ifran Khalid and Ifran Naseer wanted to carry out a big attack, prosecutors say. "These men had dangerous aspirations," says prosecutor Karen Jones.