user: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: A total waste of money! Isn't worth paying the shipping fee if it were free. Don't buy this very dull, disappointing video. Total dude. Doesn't deserve to be rated even with one star. Answer:
OPTIONS:
- No
- Yes

Answer: No

Question: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: DO NOT WASTE YOUR MONEY.....Just another vehicle to hi-light the (non) acting abilites of depp....... Answer:
OPTIONS:
- No
- Yes
Answer: No

input with options: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: Apparently Al has either gone over the edge or lost all contact with reality or been on mind alterung drugs way to long . Don't waste you money on this book. I did and I'm sorry I did . If you can't attack your opponents arguement attack him personnaly since al can't even understand the arguement he attacks his opponents at a personal level not very smart AL . Answer:
OPTIONS:
- No
- Yes
output: No

Q: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: You can't even really call this a translation; it's more like a reinterpolated augmentation of Virgils Georgics & Eclogues with translator David Slavitt's own lame hippy sentiments(this translation was published in the 60's, so it's peppered with the vernacular and slang of the time. groovy! not.) He goes on to reference Washington D.C., The Smithsonian, Sam Vaughn, Virgil himself and other things that have nothing to do with the actual work; this creates a meaningless time-void/warp within work. In the preface/introduction, Slavitt boosts of his trailblazing taking-of-liberties; this is just self-congradulatory. His justification for distorting it all was to get school kids to read it. It wasn't worth the effort. Answer:

OPTIONS:
- No
- Yes

A: No

input: OPTIONS:
- No
- Yes Now, answer this question: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: I could see where the author wanted to go, and it's a good concept, but the ironic thing is that the first lesson of Level 3 is, "How to follow instructions". I'm 37 years old with 4 college degrees, and I had to re-read the instructions several times over to figure out what they wanted.We didn't start this curriculum from the beginning and dove into Level 3, so Maybe if you start with Level 1 it Might help?Also, it seemed that the instructions were a bit... sarcastic? Or, maybe it seemed that the author was "talking down" to the student. For example: [Not a direct quote, because I swapped it on PaperBackSwap.com...] "Now, if you didn't get that, go back and re-read the last paragraph 3 times till you do." Answer:
A:
output: No

Question: Based on this review, would the user recommend this product? === Review: This is really not a romantic book, the Hero is not a Hero. Maybe the author wants to tie things up all so HEA for everyone, but when the ex still rules his life like that and he still turns around and buys her a boutique, I just can't imagine anyone doing that, it's just the biggest WTF moment.Toooooooooooooooooooooo much angst. Why did he have to marry her if he felt guilty why didn't he just buy her the shop in the first place. Heroine surely knows where she stands in Hero's life definatley behind the ex. Answer:
OPTIONS:
- No
- Yes
Answer:

assistant: No