orgrctera/uda_fin_qa huggingface dataset:
{"pre_text": ["entergy arkansas , inc .", "and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .", "results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense .", "2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses .", "net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .", "following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .", "amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 .", "see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement .", "the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .", "the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. ."], "table": [["", "amount ( in millions )"], ["2010 net revenue", "$ 1216.7"], ["retail electric price", "31.0"], ["ano decommissioning trust", "26.4"], ["transmission revenue", "13.1"], ["volume/weather", "-15.9 ( 15.9 )"], ["net wholesale revenue", "-11.9 ( 11.9 )"], ["capacity acquisition recovery", "-10.3 ( 10.3 )"], ["other", "3.2"], ["2011 net revenue", "$ 1252.3"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Millions)"], ["2010 net revenue", "$1,216.7"], ["Retail electric price", "31.0"], ["ANO decommissioning trust", "26.4"], ["Transmission revenue", "13.1"], ["Volume/weather", "(15.9)"], ["Net wholesale revenue", "(11.9)"], ["Capacity acquisition recovery", "(10.3)"], ["Other", "3.2"], ["2011 net revenue", "$1,252.3"]]}

Question: from the increase in net revenue , what percentage is attributed to the change in retail electric price?
Evidence:
table_1: the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1216.7 ;
table_2: the retail electric price of amount ( in millions ) is 31.0 ;
table_9: the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1252.3 ;
Program: subtract(1252.3, 1216.7), divide(31.0, #0)
Answer:
str_answer: 87.1%
exe_answer: 0.87079
{"pre_text": ["entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term .", "the amount was a net regulatory asset ( liability ) of ( $ 2.0 ) million and $ 60.6 million as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .", "as of december 31 , 2011 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) ."], "post_text": ["."], "table": [["", "amount ( in thousands )"], ["2012", "$ 49959"], ["2013", "50546"], ["2014", "51637"], ["2015", "52253"], ["2016", "-"], ["years thereafter", "-"], ["total", "204395"], ["less : amount representing interest", "25611"], ["present value of net minimum lease payments", "$ 178784"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Thousands)"], ["2012", "$49,959"], ["2013", "50,546"], ["2014", "51,637"], ["2015", "52,253"], ["2016", "-"], ["Years thereafter", "-"], ["Total", "204,395"], ["Less: Amount representing interest", "25,611"], ["Present value of net minimum lease payments", "$178,784"]]}

Question: what portion of the future minimum lease payments is expected to be paid within the next 12 months?
Evidence:
table_7: the total of amount ( in thousands ) is 204395 ;
table_1: the 2012 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 49959 ;
Program: divide(49959, 204395)
Answer:
str_answer: 24.4%
exe_answer: 0.24442
{"pre_text": ["entergy new orleans , inc .", "management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .", "results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue .", "2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .", "net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .", "following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .", "amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 .", "see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .", "the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 .", "the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset .", "see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. ."], "table": [["", "amount ( in millions )"], ["2010 net revenue", "$ 272.9"], ["retail electric price", "-16.9 ( 16.9 )"], ["net gas revenue", "-9.1 ( 9.1 )"], ["gas cost recovery asset", "-3.0 ( 3.0 )"], ["volume/weather", "5.4"], ["other", "-2.3 ( 2.3 )"], ["2011 net revenue", "$ 247.0"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Millions)"], ["2010 net revenue", "$272.9"], ["Retail electric price", "(16.9)"], ["Net gas revenue", "(9.1)"], ["Gas cost recovery asset", "(3.0)"], ["Volume/weather", "5.4"], ["Other", "(2.3)"], ["2011 net revenue", "$247.0"]]}

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue from 2010 to 2011?
Evidence:
table_1: the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 272.9 ;
table_7: the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 247.0 ;
Program: subtract(247.0, 272.9), divide(#0, 272.9)
Answer:
str_answer: -9.5%
exe_answer: -0.09491
{"pre_text": ["entergy new orleans , inc .", "management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .", "results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue .", "2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .", "net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .", "following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .", "amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 .", "see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .", "the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 .", "the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset .", "see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. ."], "table": [["", "amount ( in millions )"], ["2010 net revenue", "$ 272.9"], ["retail electric price", "-16.9 ( 16.9 )"], ["net gas revenue", "-9.1 ( 9.1 )"], ["gas cost recovery asset", "-3.0 ( 3.0 )"], ["volume/weather", "5.4"], ["other", "-2.3 ( 2.3 )"], ["2011 net revenue", "$ 247.0"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Millions)"], ["2010 net revenue", "$272.9"], ["Retail electric price", "(16.9)"], ["Net gas revenue", "(9.1)"], ["Gas cost recovery asset", "(3.0)"], ["Volume/weather", "5.4"], ["Other", "(2.3)"], ["2011 net revenue", "$247.0"]]}

Question: from the change in net revenue in 2011 , what percentage is attributed to change in retail electric price?
Evidence:
table_1: the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 272.9 ;
table_2: the retail electric price of amount ( in millions ) is -16.9 ( 16.9 ) ;
table_7: the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 247.0 ;
Program: subtract(247.0, 272.9), divide(-16.9, #0)
Answer:
str_answer: 65.3%
exe_answer: 0.65251
{"pre_text": ["entergy mississippi , inc .", "management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .", "results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 23.4 million primarily due to a lower effective income tax rate .", "2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 6.0 million primarily due to higher net revenue and higher other income , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and higher interest expense .", "net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .", "following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .", "amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["the volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 97 gwh in weather-adjusted usage in the residential and commercial sectors and a decrease in sales volume in the unbilled sales period .", "the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to the addition in 2011 of transmission investments that are subject to equalization .", "gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 57.5 million in gross wholesale revenues due to an increase in sales to affiliated customers , partially offset by a decrease of $ 26.9 million in power management rider revenue .", "fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power. ."], "table": [["", "amount ( in millions )"], ["2010 net revenue", "$ 555.3"], ["volume/weather", "-4.5 ( 4.5 )"], ["transmission equalization", "4.5"], ["other", "-0.4 ( 0.4 )"], ["2011 net revenue", "$ 554.9"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Millions)"], ["2010 net revenue", "$555.3"], ["Volume/weather", "(4.5)"], ["Transmission equalization", "4.5"], ["Other", "(0.4)"], ["2011 net revenue", "$554.9"]]}

Question: what was the ratio of the increase in the net income in 2011 compared to 2010
Evidence:
text_2: results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 23.4 million primarily due to a lower effective income tax rate .
text_3: 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 6.0 million primarily due to higher net revenue and higher other income , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and higher interest expense .
Program: divide(23.4, const_6)
Answer:
str_answer: 3.9
exe_answer: 3.9
{"pre_text": ["entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term .", "the amount was a net regulatory asset ( liability ) of ( $ 2.0 ) million and $ 60.6 million as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .", "as of december 31 , 2011 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) ."], "post_text": ["."], "table": [["", "amount ( in thousands )"], ["2012", "$ 49959"], ["2013", "50546"], ["2014", "51637"], ["2015", "52253"], ["2016", "-"], ["years thereafter", "-"], ["total", "204395"], ["less : amount representing interest", "25611"], ["present value of net minimum lease payments", "$ 178784"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Thousands)"], ["2012", "$49,959"], ["2013", "50,546"], ["2014", "51,637"], ["2015", "52,253"], ["2016", "-"], ["Years thereafter", "-"], ["Total", "204,395"], ["Less: Amount representing interest", "25,611"], ["Present value of net minimum lease payments", "$178,784"]]}

Question: as of december 31 , 2011what was the percent of system energy future minimum lease payments that was due in 2015
Evidence:
table_4: the 2015 of amount ( in thousands ) is 52253 ;
table_7: the total of amount ( in thousands ) is 204395 ;
Program: divide(52253, 204395)
Answer:
str_answer: 25.6%
exe_answer: 0.25565
{"pre_text": ["entergy arkansas , inc .", "and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .", "results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense .", "2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses .", "net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .", "following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .", "amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 .", "see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement .", "the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .", "the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. ."], "table": [["", "amount ( in millions )"], ["2010 net revenue", "$ 1216.7"], ["retail electric price", "31.0"], ["ano decommissioning trust", "26.4"], ["transmission revenue", "13.1"], ["volume/weather", "-15.9 ( 15.9 )"], ["net wholesale revenue", "-11.9 ( 11.9 )"], ["capacity acquisition recovery", "-10.3 ( 10.3 )"], ["other", "3.2"], ["2011 net revenue", "$ 1252.3"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Millions)"], ["2010 net revenue", "$1,216.7"], ["Retail electric price", "31.0"], ["ANO decommissioning trust", "26.4"], ["Transmission revenue", "13.1"], ["Volume/weather", "(15.9)"], ["Net wholesale revenue", "(11.9)"], ["Capacity acquisition recovery", "(10.3)"], ["Other", "3.2"], ["2011 net revenue", "$1,252.3"]]}

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue in 2011
Evidence:
table_1: the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1216.7 ;
table_9: the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1252.3 ;
Program: subtract(1252.3, 1216.7)
Answer:
str_answer: 2.9%
exe_answer: 35.6
{"pre_text": ["entergy mississippi , inc .", "management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .", "results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 23.4 million primarily due to a lower effective income tax rate .", "2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 6.0 million primarily due to higher net revenue and higher other income , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and higher interest expense .", "net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .", "following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .", "amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["the volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 97 gwh in weather-adjusted usage in the residential and commercial sectors and a decrease in sales volume in the unbilled sales period .", "the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to the addition in 2011 of transmission investments that are subject to equalization .", "gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 57.5 million in gross wholesale revenues due to an increase in sales to affiliated customers , partially offset by a decrease of $ 26.9 million in power management rider revenue .", "fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power. ."], "table": [["", "amount ( in millions )"], ["2010 net revenue", "$ 555.3"], ["volume/weather", "-4.5 ( 4.5 )"], ["transmission equalization", "4.5"], ["other", "-0.4 ( 0.4 )"], ["2011 net revenue", "$ 554.9"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Millions)"], ["2010 net revenue", "$555.3"], ["Volume/weather", "(4.5)"], ["Transmission equalization", "4.5"], ["Other", "(0.4)"], ["2011 net revenue", "$554.9"]]}

Question: what is the net change in net revenues from 2010 to 2011?
Evidence:
table_1: the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 555.3 ;
table_5: the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 554.9 ;
Program: subtract(554.9, 555.3)
Answer:
str_answer: 1.6
exe_answer: -0.4
{"pre_text": ["entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term .", "the amount was a net regulatory asset ( liability ) of ( $ 2.0 ) million and $ 60.6 million as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .", "as of december 31 , 2011 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) ."], "post_text": ["."], "table": [["", "amount ( in thousands )"], ["2012", "$ 49959"], ["2013", "50546"], ["2014", "51637"], ["2015", "52253"], ["2016", "-"], ["years thereafter", "-"], ["total", "204395"], ["less : amount representing interest", "25611"], ["present value of net minimum lease payments", "$ 178784"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Thousands)"], ["2012", "$49,959"], ["2013", "50,546"], ["2014", "51,637"], ["2015", "52,253"], ["2016", "-"], ["Years thereafter", "-"], ["Total", "204,395"], ["Less: Amount representing interest", "25,611"], ["Present value of net minimum lease payments", "$178,784"]]}

Question: in how many years will is the company expected to pay off all its future minimum lease payments?
Evidence:
table_1: the 2012 of amount ( in thousands ) is $ 49959 ;
table_2: the 2013 of amount ( in thousands ) is 50546 ;
table_3: the 2014 of amount ( in thousands ) is 51637 ;
table_4: the 2015 of amount ( in thousands ) is 52253 ;
text_2: as of december 31 , 2011 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .
Program: subtract(2015, 2011)
Answer:
str_answer: 4
exe_answer: 4