orgrctera/uda_fin_qa huggingface dataset:
{"pre_text": ["entergy texas , inc .", "and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .", "results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased by $ 14.6 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .", "2010 compared to 2009 net income increased by $ 2.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower other income , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses .", "net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .", "following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .", "amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 , with an additional increase of $ 9 million beginning may 2011 , as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case .", "see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement .", "the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 721 gwh , or 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year .", "usage in the industrial sector increased 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) primarily in the chemicals and refining industries .", "the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases. ."], "table": [["", "amount ( in millions )"], ["2010 net revenue", "$ 540.2"], ["retail electric price", "36.0"], ["volume/weather", "21.3"], ["purchased power capacity", "-24.6 ( 24.6 )"], ["other", "4.9"], ["2011 net revenue", "$ 577.8"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Millions)"], ["2010 net revenue", "$540.2"], ["Retail electric price", "36.0"], ["Volume/weather", "21.3"], ["Purchased power capacity", "(24.6)"], ["Other", "4.9"], ["2011 net revenue", "$577.8"]]}

Question: what percent of of the total variance in net revenue is attributed to the variance in volume/weather?
Evidence:
table_1: the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 540.2 ;
table_3: the volume/weather of amount ( in millions ) is 21.3 ;
table_6: the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 577.8 ;
Program: subtract(577.8, 540.2), divide(21.3, #0)
Answer:
str_answer: 56.6%
exe_answer: 0.56649
{"pre_text": ["entergy texas , inc .", "and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .", "results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased by $ 14.6 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .", "2010 compared to 2009 net income increased by $ 2.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower other income , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses .", "net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .", "following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .", "amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 , with an additional increase of $ 9 million beginning may 2011 , as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case .", "see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement .", "the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 721 gwh , or 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year .", "usage in the industrial sector increased 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) primarily in the chemicals and refining industries .", "the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases. ."], "table": [["", "amount ( in millions )"], ["2010 net revenue", "$ 540.2"], ["retail electric price", "36.0"], ["volume/weather", "21.3"], ["purchased power capacity", "-24.6 ( 24.6 )"], ["other", "4.9"], ["2011 net revenue", "$ 577.8"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Millions)"], ["2010 net revenue", "$540.2"], ["Retail electric price", "36.0"], ["Volume/weather", "21.3"], ["Purchased power capacity", "(24.6)"], ["Other", "4.9"], ["2011 net revenue", "$577.8"]]}

Question: what was the average net revenue from 2010 to 2011
Evidence:
table_1: the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 540.2 ;
table_6: the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 577.8 ;
Program: add(577.8, 540.2), add(#0, const_2), divide(#1, const_2)
Answer:
str_answer: 559
exe_answer: 560
{"pre_text": ["entergy texas , inc .", "and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .", "results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased by $ 14.6 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .", "2010 compared to 2009 net income increased by $ 2.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower other income , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses .", "net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .", "following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .", "amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 , with an additional increase of $ 9 million beginning may 2011 , as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case .", "see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement .", "the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 721 gwh , or 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year .", "usage in the industrial sector increased 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) primarily in the chemicals and refining industries .", "the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases. ."], "table": [["", "amount ( in millions )"], ["2010 net revenue", "$ 540.2"], ["retail electric price", "36.0"], ["volume/weather", "21.3"], ["purchased power capacity", "-24.6 ( 24.6 )"], ["other", "4.9"], ["2011 net revenue", "$ 577.8"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Millions)"], ["2010 net revenue", "$540.2"], ["Retail electric price", "36.0"], ["Volume/weather", "21.3"], ["Purchased power capacity", "(24.6)"], ["Other", "4.9"], ["2011 net revenue", "$577.8"]]}

Question: what was the ratio of the net income to the revenues in 2010
Evidence:
table_1: the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 540.2 ;
text_3: 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased by $ 2.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower other income , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses .
Program: divide(2.4, 540.2)
Answer:
str_answer: 0.44%
exe_answer: 0.00444
{"pre_text": ["declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change .", "in addition , under the terms of the merger agreement , we have agreed with aetna to coordinate the declaration and payment of dividends so that our stockholders do not fail to receive a quarterly dividend around the time of the closing of the merger .", "on october 29 , 2015 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.29 per share that was paid on january 29 , 2016 to stockholders of record on december 30 , 2015 , for an aggregate amount of $ 43 million .", "stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 .", "the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2010 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. ."], "post_text": ["the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. ."], "table": [["", "12/31/2010", "12/31/2011", "12/31/2012", "12/31/2013", "12/31/2014", "12/31/2015"], ["hum", "$ 100", "$ 162", "$ 128", "$ 195", "$ 274", "$ 343"], ["s&p 500", "$ 100", "$ 102", "$ 118", "$ 157", "$ 178", "$ 181"], ["peer group", "$ 100", "$ 110", "$ 129", "$ 177", "$ 226", "$ 239"]], "table_ori": [["", "12/31/2010", "12/31/2011", "12/31/2012", "12/31/2013", "12/31/2014", "12/31/2015"], ["HUM", "$100", "$162", "$128", "$195", "$274", "$343"], ["S&P 500", "$100", "$102", "$118", "$157", "$178", "$181"], ["Peer Group", "$100", "$110", "$129", "$177", "$226", "$239"]]}

Question: what is the highest return for the first year of the investment?
Evidence:
table_1: the hum of 12/31/2010 is $ 100 ; the hum of 12/31/2011 is $ 162 ; the hum of 12/31/2012 is $ 128 ; the hum of 12/31/2013 is $ 195 ; the hum of 12/31/2014 is $ 274 ; the hum of 12/31/2015 is $ 343 ;
table_2: the s&p 500 of 12/31/2010 is $ 100 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2011 is $ 102 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2012 is $ 118 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2013 is $ 157 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2014 is $ 178 ; the s&p 500 of 12/31/2015 is $ 181 ;
table_3: the peer group of 12/31/2010 is $ 100 ; the peer group of 12/31/2011 is $ 110 ; the peer group of 12/31/2012 is $ 129 ; the peer group of 12/31/2013 is $ 177 ; the peer group of 12/31/2014 is $ 226 ; the peer group of 12/31/2015 is $ 239 ;
Program: subtract(162, 100)
Answer:
str_answer: 62%
exe_answer: 62
{"pre_text": ["declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change .", "in addition , under the terms of the merger agreement , we have agreed with aetna to coordinate the declaration and payment of dividends so that our stockholders do not fail to receive a quarterly dividend around the time of the closing of the merger .", "on october 29 , 2015 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.29 per share that was paid on january 29 , 2016 to stockholders of record on december 30 , 2015 , for an aggregate amount of $ 43 million .", "stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 .", "the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2010 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. ."], "post_text": ["the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. ."], "table": [["", "12/31/2010", "12/31/2011", "12/31/2012", "12/31/2013", "12/31/2014", "12/31/2015"], ["hum", "$ 100", "$ 162", "$ 128", "$ 195", "$ 274", "$ 343"], ["s&p 500", "$ 100", "$ 102", "$ 118", "$ 157", "$ 178", "$ 181"], ["peer group", "$ 100", "$ 110", "$ 129", "$ 177", "$ 226", "$ 239"]], "table_ori": [["", "12/31/2010", "12/31/2011", "12/31/2012", "12/31/2013", "12/31/2014", "12/31/2015"], ["HUM", "$100", "$162", "$128", "$195", "$274", "$343"], ["S&P 500", "$100", "$102", "$118", "$157", "$178", "$181"], ["Peer Group", "$100", "$110", "$129", "$177", "$226", "$239"]]}

Question: what was the percent of the decline in the stock price performance for hum from 2011 to 2012
Evidence:
table_1: the hum of 12/31/2010 is $ 100 ; the hum of 12/31/2011 is $ 162 ; the hum of 12/31/2012 is $ 128 ; the hum of 12/31/2013 is $ 195 ; the hum of 12/31/2014 is $ 274 ; the hum of 12/31/2015 is $ 343 ;
Program: divide(128, 162), divide(#0, 162)
Answer:
str_answer: -21%
exe_answer: 0.00488
{"pre_text": ["declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change .", "in addition , under the terms of the merger agreement , we have agreed with aetna to coordinate the declaration and payment of dividends so that our stockholders do not fail to receive a quarterly dividend around the time of the closing of the merger .", "on october 29 , 2015 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.29 per share that was paid on january 29 , 2016 to stockholders of record on december 30 , 2015 , for an aggregate amount of $ 43 million .", "stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 .", "the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2010 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. ."], "post_text": ["the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. ."], "table": [["", "12/31/2010", "12/31/2011", "12/31/2012", "12/31/2013", "12/31/2014", "12/31/2015"], ["hum", "$ 100", "$ 162", "$ 128", "$ 195", "$ 274", "$ 343"], ["s&p 500", "$ 100", "$ 102", "$ 118", "$ 157", "$ 178", "$ 181"], ["peer group", "$ 100", "$ 110", "$ 129", "$ 177", "$ 226", "$ 239"]], "table_ori": [["", "12/31/2010", "12/31/2011", "12/31/2012", "12/31/2013", "12/31/2014", "12/31/2015"], ["HUM", "$100", "$162", "$128", "$195", "$274", "$343"], ["S&P 500", "$100", "$102", "$118", "$157", "$178", "$181"], ["Peer Group", "$100", "$110", "$129", "$177", "$226", "$239"]]}

Question: as of december 30 , what was the number of stockholders of record 2015 in millions
Evidence:
text_2: on october 29 , 2015 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.29 per share that was paid on january 29 , 2016 to stockholders of record on december 30 , 2015 , for an aggregate amount of $ 43 million .
Program: divide(43, 0.29)
Answer:
str_answer: 148
exe_answer: 148.27586
{"pre_text": ["schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding ."], "post_text": ["see the notes to consolidated financial statements ."], "table": [["", "issued", "in treasury", "shares outstanding"], ["balance january 1 2009", "1334", "-140 ( 140 )", "1194"], ["shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged", "2013", "4", "4"], ["vesting of restricted stock", "2013", "1", "1"], ["shares issued under employee stock purchase plan", "2013", "4", "4"], ["stock repurchase program", "2013", "-8 ( 8 )", "-8 ( 8 )"], ["balance december 31 2009", "1334", "-139 ( 139 )", "1195"], ["acquisition of smith international inc .", "100", "76", "176"], ["shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged", "2013", "6", "6"], ["shares issued under employee stock purchase plan", "2013", "3", "3"], ["stock repurchase program", "2013", "-27 ( 27 )", "-27 ( 27 )"], ["issued on conversions of debentures", "2013", "8", "8"], ["balance december 31 2010", "1434", "-73 ( 73 )", "1361"], ["shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged", "2013", "6", "6"], ["vesting of restricted stock", "2013", "1", "1"], ["shares issued under employee stock purchase plan", "2013", "3", "3"], ["stock repurchase program", "2013", "-37 ( 37 )", "-37 ( 37 )"], ["balance december 31 2011", "1434", "-100 ( 100 )", "1334"]], "table_ori": [["", "Issued", "In Treasury", "Shares Outstanding"], ["Balance, January 1, 2009", "1,334", "(140)", "1,194"], ["Shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged", "–", "4", "4"], ["Vesting of restricted stock", "–", "1", "1"], ["Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan", "–", "4", "4"], ["Stock repurchase program", "–", "(8)", "(8)"], ["Balance, December 31, 2009", "1,334", "(139)", "1,195"], ["Acquisition of Smith International, Inc.", "100", "76", "176"], ["Shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged", "–", "6", "6"], ["Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan", "–", "3", "3"], ["Stock repurchase program", "–", "(27)", "(27)"], ["Issued on conversions of debentures", "–", "8", "8"], ["Balance, December 31, 2010", "1,434", "(73)", "1,361"], ["Shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged", "–", "6", "6"], ["Vesting of restricted stock", "–", "1", "1"], ["Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan", "–", "3", "3"], ["Stock repurchase program", "–", "(37)", "(37)"], ["Balance, December 31, 2011", "1,434", "(100)", "1,334"]]}

Question: what was the net change in shares outstanding during 2011?
Evidence:
table_12: the balance december 31 2010 of issued is 1434 ; the balance december 31 2010 of in treasury is -73 ( 73 ) ; the balance december 31 2010 of shares outstanding is 1361 ;
table_7: the acquisition of smith international inc . of issued is 100 ; the acquisition of smith international inc . of in treasury is 76 ; the acquisition of smith international inc . of shares outstanding is 176 ;
Program: subtract(1434, 1434)
Answer:
str_answer: 0
exe_answer: 0
{"pre_text": ["vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 10 .", "redeemable noncontrolling interests - continued redeemable noncontrolling interests on our consolidated balance sheets are recorded at the greater of their carrying amount or redemption value at the end of each reporting period .", "changes in the value from period to period are charged to 201cadditional capital 201d in our consolidated statements of changes in equity .", "below is a table summarizing the activity of redeemable noncontrolling interests .", "( amounts in thousands ) ."], "post_text": ["as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the aggregate redemption value of redeemable class a units was $ 1066974000 and $ 971628000 , respectively .", "redeemable noncontrolling interests exclude our series g convertible preferred units and series d-13 cumulative redeemable preferred units , as they are accounted for as liabilities in accordance with asc 480 , distinguishing liabilities and equity , because of their possible settlement by issuing a variable number of vornado common shares .", "accordingly the fair value of these units is included as a component of 201cother liabilities 201d on our consolidated balance sheets and aggregated $ 55097000 and $ 60271000 as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively. ."], "table": [["balance at december 31 2008", "$ 1177978"], ["net income", "25120"], ["distributions", "-42451 ( 42451 )"], ["conversion of class a units into common shares at redemption value", "-90955 ( 90955 )"], ["adjustment to carry redeemable class a units at redemption value", "167049"], ["other net", "14887"], ["balance at december 31 2009", "$ 1251628"], ["net income", "55228"], ["distributions", "-53515 ( 53515 )"], ["conversion of class a units into common shares at redemption value", "-126764 ( 126764 )"], ["adjustment to carry redeemable class a units at redemption value", "191826"], ["redemption of series d-12 redeemable units", "-13000 ( 13000 )"], ["other net", "22571"], ["balance at december 31 2010", "$ 1327974"]], "table_ori": [["Balance at December 31, 2008", "$1,177,978"], ["Net income", "25,120"], ["Distributions", "(42,451)"], ["Conversion of Class A units into common shares, at redemption value", "(90,955)"], ["Adjustment to carry redeemable Class A units at redemption value", "167,049"], ["Other, net", "14,887"], ["Balance at December 31, 2009", "$1,251,628"], ["Net income", "55,228"], ["Distributions", "(53,515)"], ["Conversion of Class A units into common shares, at redemption value", "(126,764)"], ["Adjustment to carry redeemable Class A units at redemption value", "191,826"], ["Redemption of Series D-12 redeemable units", "(13,000)"], ["Other, net", "22,571"], ["Balance at December 31, 2010", "$1,327,974"]]}

Question: what was the percentage change in the redeemable non controlling interests balance at december 31 2009 from 2008
Evidence:
table_6: balance at december 31 2008 the balance at december 31 2009 of $ 1177978 is $ 1251628 ;
Program: subtract(1251628, 1177978), divide(#0, 1177978)
Answer:
str_answer: 6.3%
exe_answer: 0.06252
{"pre_text": ["performance graph the following graph is a comparison of the five-year cumulative return of our common shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index ( the 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and the national association of real estate investment trusts 2019 ( 201cnareit 201d ) all equity index ( excluding health care real estate investment trusts ) , a peer group index .", "the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in our common shares , the s&p 500 index and the nareit all equity index and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions .", "there can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below. ."], "post_text": ["."], "table": [["", "2005", "2006", "2007", "2008", "2009", "2010"], ["vornado realty trust", "100", "151", "113", "81", "100", "124"], ["s&p 500 index", "100", "116", "122", "77", "97", "112"], ["the nareit all equity index", "100", "135", "114", "71", "91", "116"]], "table_ori": [["", "2005", "2006", "2007", "2008", "2009", "2010"], ["Vornado Realty Trust", "100", "151", "113", "81", "100", "124"], ["S&P 500 Index", "100", "116", "122", "77", "97", "112"], ["The NAREIT All Equity Index", "100", "135", "114", "71", "91", "116"]]}

Question: what was the average price of the the nareit all equity index from 2005 to 2009
Evidence:
table_3: the the nareit all equity index of 2005 is 100 ; the the nareit all equity index of 2006 is 135 ; the the nareit all equity index of 2007 is 114 ; the the nareit all equity index of 2008 is 71 ; the the nareit all equity index of 2009 is 91 ; the the nareit all equity index of 2010 is 116 ;
Program: add(100, 135), add(#0, 114), add(#1, 71), add(#2, 91), add(#3, const_5), divide(#4, const_2)
Answer:
str_answer: 102.2
exe_answer: 258