orgrctera/uda_fin_qa huggingface dataset:
{"pre_text": ["devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note .", "geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $ 2.2 billion , net of discounts and issuance costs .", "the floating rate senior notes due in 2015 bear interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.45 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly .", "the floating rate senior notes due in 2016 bears interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.54 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly .", "the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . ."], "post_text": ["( 1 ) the 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) $ 650 million note due december 15 , 2016 was redeemed on november 13 , 2014 .", "the senior notes were classified as short-term debt on devon 2019s consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013 due to certain redemption features in the event that the geosouthern acquisition was not completed on or prior to june 30 , 2014 .", "on february 28 , 2014 , the geosouthern acquisition closed and thus the senior notes were subsequently classified as long-term debt .", "additionally , during december 2013 , devon entered into a term loan agreement with a group of major financial institutions pursuant to which devon could draw up to $ 2.0 billion to finance , in part , the geosouthern acquisition and to pay transaction costs .", "in february 2014 , devon drew the $ 2.0 billion of term loans for the geosouthern transaction , and the amount was subsequently repaid on june 30 , 2014 with the canadian divestiture proceeds that were repatriated to the u.s .", "in june 2014 , at which point the term loan was terminated. ."], "table": [["floating rate due december 15 2015", "$ 500"], ["floating rate due december 15 2016", "350"], ["1.20% ( 1.20 % ) due december 15 2016 ( 1 )", "650"], ["2.25% ( 2.25 % ) due december 15 2018", "750"], ["discount and issuance costs", "-2 ( 2 )"], ["net proceeds", "$ 2248"]], "table_ori": [["Floating rate due December 15, 2015", "$500"], ["Floating rate due December 15, 2016", "350"], ["1.20% due December 15, 2016<sup>(1)</sup>", "650"], ["2.25% due December 15, 2018", "750"], ["Discount and issuance costs", "(2)"], ["Net proceeds", "$2,248"]]}

Question: what percentage of the net proceeds came from the floating rates due in 2015 and 2016?
Evidence:
table_1: floating rate due december 15 2015 the floating rate due december 15 2016 of $ 500 is 350 ;
table_5: floating rate due december 15 2015 the net proceeds of $ 500 is $ 2248 ;
text_4: the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . .
Program: add(500, 350), divide(#0, 2248), multiply(#1, const_100)
Answer:
str_answer: 37.81%
exe_answer: 37.81139
{"pre_text": ["devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note .", "geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $ 2.2 billion , net of discounts and issuance costs .", "the floating rate senior notes due in 2015 bear interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.45 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly .", "the floating rate senior notes due in 2016 bears interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.54 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly .", "the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . ."], "post_text": ["( 1 ) the 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) $ 650 million note due december 15 , 2016 was redeemed on november 13 , 2014 .", "the senior notes were classified as short-term debt on devon 2019s consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013 due to certain redemption features in the event that the geosouthern acquisition was not completed on or prior to june 30 , 2014 .", "on february 28 , 2014 , the geosouthern acquisition closed and thus the senior notes were subsequently classified as long-term debt .", "additionally , during december 2013 , devon entered into a term loan agreement with a group of major financial institutions pursuant to which devon could draw up to $ 2.0 billion to finance , in part , the geosouthern acquisition and to pay transaction costs .", "in february 2014 , devon drew the $ 2.0 billion of term loans for the geosouthern transaction , and the amount was subsequently repaid on june 30 , 2014 with the canadian divestiture proceeds that were repatriated to the u.s .", "in june 2014 , at which point the term loan was terminated. ."], "table": [["floating rate due december 15 2015", "$ 500"], ["floating rate due december 15 2016", "350"], ["1.20% ( 1.20 % ) due december 15 2016 ( 1 )", "650"], ["2.25% ( 2.25 % ) due december 15 2018", "750"], ["discount and issuance costs", "-2 ( 2 )"], ["net proceeds", "$ 2248"]], "table_ori": [["Floating rate due December 15, 2015", "$500"], ["Floating rate due December 15, 2016", "350"], ["1.20% due December 15, 2016<sup>(1)</sup>", "650"], ["2.25% due December 15, 2018", "750"], ["Discount and issuance costs", "(2)"], ["Net proceeds", "$2,248"]]}

Question: what is the ratio of the floating rate due december 2015 compared to 2016
Evidence:
table_1: floating rate due december 15 2015 the floating rate due december 15 2016 of $ 500 is 350 ;
Program: divide(500, 350)
Answer:
str_answer: 1.43
exe_answer: 1.42857
{"pre_text": ["devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) asset divestitures in conjunction with the asset divestitures in 2013 and 2014 , devon removed $ 26 million and $ 706 million of goodwill , respectively , which were allocated to these assets .", "impairment devon 2019s canadian goodwill was originally recognized in 2001 as a result of a business combination consisting almost entirely of conventional gas assets that devon no longer owns .", "as a result of performing the goodwill impairment test described in note 1 , devon concluded the implied fair value of its canadian goodwill was zero as of december 31 , 2014 .", "this conclusion was largely based on the significant decline in benchmark oil prices , particularly after opec 2019s decision not to reduce its production targets that was announced in late november 2014 .", "consequently , in the fourth quarter of 2014 , devon wrote off its remaining canadian goodwill and recognized a $ 1.9 billion impairment .", "other intangible assets as of december 31 , 2014 , intangible assets associated with customer relationships had a gross carrying amount of $ 569 million and $ 36 million of accumulated amortization .", "the weighted-average amortization period for the customer relationships is 13.7 years .", "amortization expense for intangibles was approximately $ 36 million for the year ended december 31 , 2014 .", "other intangible assets are reported in other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .", "the following table summarizes the estimated aggregate amortization expense for the next five years .", "year amortization amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["."], "table": [["year", "amortization amount ( in millions )"], ["2015", "$ 45"], ["2016", "$ 45"], ["2017", "$ 45"], ["2018", "$ 45"], ["2019", "$ 44"]], "table_ori": [["Year", "Amortization Amount  (In millions)"], ["2015", "$45"], ["2016", "$45"], ["2017", "$45"], ["2018", "$45"], ["2019", "$44"]]}

Question: what is the average amortization amount , in millions , from 2015-2019?
Evidence:
table_1: year the 2015 of amortization amount ( in millions ) is $ 45 ;
table_2: year the 2016 of amortization amount ( in millions ) is $ 45 ;
table_3: year the 2017 of amortization amount ( in millions ) is $ 45 ;
table_4: year the 2018 of amortization amount ( in millions ) is $ 45 ;
table_5: year the 2019 of amortization amount ( in millions ) is $ 44 ;
text_10: year amortization amount ( in millions ) .
Program: multiply(45, const_4), add(#0, 44), divide(#1, const_5)
Answer:
str_answer: 44.8
exe_answer: 44.8
{"pre_text": ["devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) asset divestitures in conjunction with the asset divestitures in 2013 and 2014 , devon removed $ 26 million and $ 706 million of goodwill , respectively , which were allocated to these assets .", "impairment devon 2019s canadian goodwill was originally recognized in 2001 as a result of a business combination consisting almost entirely of conventional gas assets that devon no longer owns .", "as a result of performing the goodwill impairment test described in note 1 , devon concluded the implied fair value of its canadian goodwill was zero as of december 31 , 2014 .", "this conclusion was largely based on the significant decline in benchmark oil prices , particularly after opec 2019s decision not to reduce its production targets that was announced in late november 2014 .", "consequently , in the fourth quarter of 2014 , devon wrote off its remaining canadian goodwill and recognized a $ 1.9 billion impairment .", "other intangible assets as of december 31 , 2014 , intangible assets associated with customer relationships had a gross carrying amount of $ 569 million and $ 36 million of accumulated amortization .", "the weighted-average amortization period for the customer relationships is 13.7 years .", "amortization expense for intangibles was approximately $ 36 million for the year ended december 31 , 2014 .", "other intangible assets are reported in other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .", "the following table summarizes the estimated aggregate amortization expense for the next five years .", "year amortization amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["."], "table": [["year", "amortization amount ( in millions )"], ["2015", "$ 45"], ["2016", "$ 45"], ["2017", "$ 45"], ["2018", "$ 45"], ["2019", "$ 44"]], "table_ori": [["Year", "Amortization Amount  (In millions)"], ["2015", "$45"], ["2016", "$45"], ["2017", "$45"], ["2018", "$45"], ["2019", "$44"]]}

Question: in 2014 , what percentage of the total amortization amount was from intangibles?
Evidence:
text_7: amortization expense for intangibles was approximately $ 36 million for the year ended december 31 , 2014 .
table_4: year the 2018 of amortization amount ( in millions ) is $ 45 ;
Program: divide(36, 45), multiply(#0, const_100)
Answer:
str_answer: 80%
exe_answer: 80
{"pre_text": ["performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 .", "the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .", "comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials ."], "post_text": ["."], "table": [["date", "citi", "s&p 500", "s&p financials"], ["31-dec-2010", "100.00", "100.00", "100.00"], ["30-dec-2011", "55.67", "102.11", "82.94"], ["31-dec-2012", "83.81", "118.45", "106.84"], ["31-dec-2013", "110.49", "156.82", "144.90"], ["31-dec-2014", "114.83", "178.28", "166.93"], ["31-dec-2015", "110.14", "180.75", "164.39"]], "table_ori": [["DATE", "CITI", "S&P 500", "S&P FINANCIALS"], ["31-Dec-2010", "100.00", "100.00", "100.00"], ["30-Dec-2011", "55.67", "102.11", "82.94"], ["31-Dec-2012", "83.81", "118.45", "106.84"], ["31-Dec-2013", "110.49", "156.82", "144.90"], ["31-Dec-2014", "114.83", "178.28", "166.93"], ["31-Dec-2015", "110.14", "180.75", "164.39"]]}

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return of citi common stock compared to the s&p financials for the five years ended 31-dec-2015?
Evidence:
table_1: date the 31-dec-2010 of citi is 100.00 ; the 31-dec-2010 of s&p 500 is 100.00 ; the 31-dec-2010 of s&p financials is 100.00 ;
table_6: date the 31-dec-2015 of citi is 110.14 ; the 31-dec-2015 of s&p 500 is 180.75 ; the 31-dec-2015 of s&p financials is 164.39 ;
Program: subtract(110.14, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(164.39, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)
Answer:
exe_answer: -0.5425
{"pre_text": ["performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 .", "the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .", "comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials ."], "post_text": ["."], "table": [["date", "citi", "s&p 500", "s&p financials"], ["31-dec-2010", "100.00", "100.00", "100.00"], ["30-dec-2011", "55.67", "102.11", "82.94"], ["31-dec-2012", "83.81", "118.45", "106.84"], ["31-dec-2013", "110.49", "156.82", "144.90"], ["31-dec-2014", "114.83", "178.28", "166.93"], ["31-dec-2015", "110.14", "180.75", "164.39"]], "table_ori": [["DATE", "CITI", "S&P 500", "S&P FINANCIALS"], ["31-Dec-2010", "100.00", "100.00", "100.00"], ["30-Dec-2011", "55.67", "102.11", "82.94"], ["31-Dec-2012", "83.81", "118.45", "106.84"], ["31-Dec-2013", "110.49", "156.82", "144.90"], ["31-Dec-2014", "114.83", "178.28", "166.93"], ["31-Dec-2015", "110.14", "180.75", "164.39"]]}

Question: what was the ratio of the growth of the cumulative total return for citi compared to s&p 500 in 2013
Evidence:
table_4: date the 31-dec-2013 of citi is 110.49 ; the 31-dec-2013 of s&p 500 is 156.82 ; the 31-dec-2013 of s&p financials is 144.90 ;
Program: subtract(110.49, const_100), subtract(156.82, const_100), divide(#0, #1)
Answer:
str_answer: .185
exe_answer: 0.18462
{"pre_text": ["performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 .", "the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .", "comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials ."], "post_text": ["."], "table": [["date", "citi", "s&p 500", "s&p financials"], ["31-dec-2010", "100.00", "100.00", "100.00"], ["30-dec-2011", "55.67", "102.11", "82.94"], ["31-dec-2012", "83.81", "118.45", "106.84"], ["31-dec-2013", "110.49", "156.82", "144.90"], ["31-dec-2014", "114.83", "178.28", "166.93"], ["31-dec-2015", "110.14", "180.75", "164.39"]], "table_ori": [["DATE", "CITI", "S&P 500", "S&P FINANCIALS"], ["31-Dec-2010", "100.00", "100.00", "100.00"], ["30-Dec-2011", "55.67", "102.11", "82.94"], ["31-Dec-2012", "83.81", "118.45", "106.84"], ["31-Dec-2013", "110.49", "156.82", "144.90"], ["31-Dec-2014", "114.83", "178.28", "166.93"], ["31-Dec-2015", "110.14", "180.75", "164.39"]]}

Question: what was the overall percentage growth of the cumulative total return for citi from 2010 to 2015
Evidence:
table_1: date the 31-dec-2010 of citi is 100.00 ; the 31-dec-2010 of s&p 500 is 100.00 ; the 31-dec-2010 of s&p financials is 100.00 ;
table_6: date the 31-dec-2015 of citi is 110.14 ; the 31-dec-2015 of s&p 500 is 180.75 ; the 31-dec-2015 of s&p financials is 164.39 ;
Program: subtract(110.14, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer:
str_answer: 10.14%
exe_answer: 0.1014
{"pre_text": ["performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 .", "the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .", "comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials ."], "post_text": ["."], "table": [["date", "citi", "s&p 500", "s&p financials"], ["31-dec-2010", "100.00", "100.00", "100.00"], ["30-dec-2011", "55.67", "102.11", "82.94"], ["31-dec-2012", "83.81", "118.45", "106.84"], ["31-dec-2013", "110.49", "156.82", "144.90"], ["31-dec-2014", "114.83", "178.28", "166.93"], ["31-dec-2015", "110.14", "180.75", "164.39"]], "table_ori": [["DATE", "CITI", "S&P 500", "S&P FINANCIALS"], ["31-Dec-2010", "100.00", "100.00", "100.00"], ["30-Dec-2011", "55.67", "102.11", "82.94"], ["31-Dec-2012", "83.81", "118.45", "106.84"], ["31-Dec-2013", "110.49", "156.82", "144.90"], ["31-Dec-2014", "114.83", "178.28", "166.93"], ["31-Dec-2015", "110.14", "180.75", "164.39"]]}

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return of citi common stock for the five years ended 31-dec-2015?
Evidence:
table_1: date the 31-dec-2010 of citi is 100.00 ; the 31-dec-2010 of s&p 500 is 100.00 ; the 31-dec-2010 of s&p financials is 100.00 ;
table_6: date the 31-dec-2015 of citi is 110.14 ; the 31-dec-2015 of s&p 500 is 180.75 ; the 31-dec-2015 of s&p financials is 164.39 ;
Program: subtract(110.14, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer:
str_answer: 10.14%
exe_answer: 0.1014
{"pre_text": ["stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .", "the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2011 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 31 , 2016 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year .", "comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .", "nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/31/1612/28/13 1/2/1612/31/11 1/3/1512/29/12 *$ 100 invested on 12/31/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .", "indexes calculated on month-end basis .", "copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .", "all rights reserved. ."], "post_text": ["the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. ."], "table": [["", "12/31/2011", "12/29/2012", "12/28/2013", "1/3/2015", "1/2/2016", "12/31/2016"], ["cadence design systems inc .", "100.00", "129.23", "133.94", "181.06", "200.10", "242.50"], ["nasdaq composite", "100.00", "116.41", "165.47", "188.69", "200.32", "216.54"], ["s&p 400 information technology", "100.00", "118.41", "165.38", "170.50", "178.74", "219.65"]], "table_ori": [["", "12/31/2011", "12/29/2012", "12/28/2013", "1/3/2015", "1/2/2016", "12/31/2016"], ["Cadence Design Systems, Inc.", "100.00", "129.23", "133.94", "181.06", "200.10", "242.50"], ["NASDAQ Composite", "100.00", "116.41", "165.47", "188.69", "200.32", "216.54"], ["S&P 400 Information Technology", "100.00", "118.41", "165.38", "170.50", "178.74", "219.65"]]}

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in nasdaq composite from the end of the year in 2015 to the end of the year in 2016?
Evidence:
table_2: the nasdaq composite of 12/31/2011 is 100.00 ; the nasdaq composite of 12/29/2012 is 116.41 ; the nasdaq composite of 12/28/2013 is 165.47 ; the nasdaq composite of 1/3/2015 is 188.69 ; the nasdaq composite of 1/2/2016 is 200.32 ; the nasdaq composite of 12/31/2016 is 216.54 ;
Program: subtract(200.32, 188.69), divide(#0, 188.69)
Answer:
str_answer: 6.2%
exe_answer: 0.06164
{"pre_text": ["stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .", "the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2011 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 31 , 2016 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year .", "comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .", "nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/31/1612/28/13 1/2/1612/31/11 1/3/1512/29/12 *$ 100 invested on 12/31/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .", "indexes calculated on month-end basis .", "copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .", "all rights reserved. ."], "post_text": ["the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. ."], "table": [["", "12/31/2011", "12/29/2012", "12/28/2013", "1/3/2015", "1/2/2016", "12/31/2016"], ["cadence design systems inc .", "100.00", "129.23", "133.94", "181.06", "200.10", "242.50"], ["nasdaq composite", "100.00", "116.41", "165.47", "188.69", "200.32", "216.54"], ["s&p 400 information technology", "100.00", "118.41", "165.38", "170.50", "178.74", "219.65"]], "table_ori": [["", "12/31/2011", "12/29/2012", "12/28/2013", "1/3/2015", "1/2/2016", "12/31/2016"], ["Cadence Design Systems, Inc.", "100.00", "129.23", "133.94", "181.06", "200.10", "242.50"], ["NASDAQ Composite", "100.00", "116.41", "165.47", "188.69", "200.32", "216.54"], ["S&P 400 Information Technology", "100.00", "118.41", "165.38", "170.50", "178.74", "219.65"]]}

Question: what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on cadence design systems inc . common stock for the period ended 12/31/2016?
Evidence:
table_1: the cadence design systems inc . of 12/31/2011 is 100.00 ; the cadence design systems inc . of 12/29/2012 is 129.23 ; the cadence design systems inc . of 12/28/2013 is 133.94 ; the cadence design systems inc . of 1/3/2015 is 181.06 ; the cadence design systems inc . of 1/2/2016 is 200.10 ; the cadence design systems inc . of 12/31/2016 is 242.50 ;
Program: subtract(242.50, const_100), divide(#0, const_100)
Answer:
str_answer: 142.50%
exe_answer: 1.425