orgrctera/uda_fin_qa huggingface dataset:
{"pre_text": ["part ii item 5 .", "market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities at january 25 , 2019 , we had 26812 holders of record of our common stock , par value $ 1 per share .", "our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol lmt .", "information concerning dividends paid on lockheed martin common stock during the past two years is as follows : common stock - dividends paid per share ."], "post_text": ["stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the total return on a cumulative basis of $ 100 invested in lockheed martin common stock on december 31 , 2013 to the standard and poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 index and the s&p aerospace & defense index .", "the s&p aerospace & defense index comprises arconic inc. , general dynamics corporation , harris corporation , huntington ingalls industries , l3 technologies , inc. , lockheed martin corporation , northrop grumman corporation , raytheon company , textron inc. , the boeing company , transdigm group inc. , and united technologies corporation .", "the stockholder return performance indicated on the graph is not a guarantee of future performance. ."], "table": [["quarter", "dividends paid per share 2018", "dividends paid per share 2017"], ["first", "$ 2.00", "$ 1.82"], ["second", "2.00", "1.82"], ["third", "2.00", "1.82"], ["fourth", "2.20", "2.00"], ["year", "$ 8.20", "$ 7.46"]], "table_ori": [["", "Dividends Paid Per Share"], ["Quarter", "2018", "2017"], ["First", "$2.00", "$1.82"], ["Second", "2.00", "1.82"], ["Third", "2.00", "1.82"], ["Fourth", "2.20", "2.00"], ["Year", "$8.20", "$7.46"]]}

Question: what was the percentage increase in the dividends paid per share for the year from 2007 to 2008
Evidence:
table_5: quarter the year of dividends paid per share 2018 is $ 8.20 ; the year of dividends paid per share 2017 is $ 7.46 ;
Program: subtract(8.20, 7.46), divide(#0, 7.46)
Answer:
str_answer: 9.9%
exe_answer: 0.0992
{"pre_text": ["part ii item 5 .", "market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities at january 25 , 2019 , we had 26812 holders of record of our common stock , par value $ 1 per share .", "our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol lmt .", "information concerning dividends paid on lockheed martin common stock during the past two years is as follows : common stock - dividends paid per share ."], "post_text": ["stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the total return on a cumulative basis of $ 100 invested in lockheed martin common stock on december 31 , 2013 to the standard and poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 index and the s&p aerospace & defense index .", "the s&p aerospace & defense index comprises arconic inc. , general dynamics corporation , harris corporation , huntington ingalls industries , l3 technologies , inc. , lockheed martin corporation , northrop grumman corporation , raytheon company , textron inc. , the boeing company , transdigm group inc. , and united technologies corporation .", "the stockholder return performance indicated on the graph is not a guarantee of future performance. ."], "table": [["quarter", "dividends paid per share 2018", "dividends paid per share 2017"], ["first", "$ 2.00", "$ 1.82"], ["second", "2.00", "1.82"], ["third", "2.00", "1.82"], ["fourth", "2.20", "2.00"], ["year", "$ 8.20", "$ 7.46"]], "table_ori": [["", "Dividends Paid Per Share"], ["Quarter", "2018", "2017"], ["First", "$2.00", "$1.82"], ["Second", "2.00", "1.82"], ["Third", "2.00", "1.82"], ["Fourth", "2.20", "2.00"], ["Year", "$8.20", "$7.46"]]}

Question: what is the net change in total dividends paid per share from 2017 to 2018?
Evidence:
table_5: quarter the year of dividends paid per share 2018 is $ 8.20 ; the year of dividends paid per share 2017 is $ 7.46 ;
Program: subtract(8.20, 7.46)
Answer:
str_answer: 0.74
exe_answer: 0.74
{"pre_text": ["entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .", "results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 242.5 million primarily due to a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts , which resulted in a $ 422 million income tax benefit .", "the net income effect was partially offset by a $ 199 million regulatory charge , which reduced net revenue , because a portion of the benefit will be shared with customers .", "see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .", "2010 compared to 2009 net income decreased slightly by $ 1.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , a higher effective income tax rate , and higher interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher net revenue .", "net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .", "following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .", "amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 .", "see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .", "the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective may 2011 .", "see note 2 to the financial statements for discussion of the formula rate plan increase. ."], "table": [["", "amount ( in millions )"], ["2010 net revenue", "$ 1043.7"], ["mark-to-market tax settlement sharing", "-195.9 ( 195.9 )"], ["retail electric price", "32.5"], ["volume/weather", "11.6"], ["other", "-5.7 ( 5.7 )"], ["2011 net revenue", "$ 886.2"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Millions)"], ["2010 net revenue", "$1,043.7"], ["Mark-to-market tax settlement sharing", "(195.9)"], ["Retail electric price", "32.5"], ["Volume/weather", "11.6"], ["Other", "(5.7)"], ["2011 net revenue", "$886.2"]]}

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2010 to 2011
Evidence:
table_1: the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1043.7 ;
table_6: the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 886.2 ;
Program: subtract(886.2, 1043.7), divide(#0, 1043.7)
Answer:
str_answer: 15.1%
exe_answer: -0.15091
{"pre_text": ["entergy mississippi , inc .", "management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .", "results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 23.4 million primarily due to a lower effective income tax rate .", "2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 6.0 million primarily due to higher net revenue and higher other income , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and higher interest expense .", "net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .", "following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .", "amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["the volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 97 gwh in weather-adjusted usage in the residential and commercial sectors and a decrease in sales volume in the unbilled sales period .", "the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to the addition in 2011 of transmission investments that are subject to equalization .", "gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 57.5 million in gross wholesale revenues due to an increase in sales to affiliated customers , partially offset by a decrease of $ 26.9 million in power management rider revenue .", "fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power. ."], "table": [["", "amount ( in millions )"], ["2010 net revenue", "$ 555.3"], ["volume/weather", "-4.5 ( 4.5 )"], ["transmission equalization", "4.5"], ["other", "-0.4 ( 0.4 )"], ["2011 net revenue", "$ 554.9"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Millions)"], ["2010 net revenue", "$555.3"], ["Volume/weather", "(4.5)"], ["Transmission equalization", "4.5"], ["Other", "(0.4)"], ["2011 net revenue", "$554.9"]]}

Question: based on the review of the net revenue changes what was ratio of the volume/weather to the transmission equalization
Evidence:
table_2: the volume/weather of amount ( in millions ) is -4.5 ( 4.5 ) ;
table_3: the transmission equalization of amount ( in millions ) is 4.5 ;
Program: divide(-4.5, 4.5)
Answer:
str_answer: -1
exe_answer: -1
{"pre_text": ["entergy gulf states louisiana , l.l.c .", "management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .", "results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 12.3 million primarily due to lower interest expense and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 37.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher taxes other than income taxes .", "net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits .", "following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .", "amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in credits passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing .", "see 201cmanagement 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2013 hurricane gustav and hurricane ike 201d and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the act 55 storm cost financing .", "the volume/weather variance is primarily due to less favorable weather on the residential sector as well as the unbilled sales period .", "the decrease was partially offset by an increase of 62 gwh , or 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) , in billed electricity usage , primarily due to increased consumption by an industrial customer as a result of the customer 2019s cogeneration outage and the addition of a new production unit by the industrial customer .", "the fuel recovery variance resulted primarily from an adjustment to deferred fuel costs in 2010 .", "see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of fuel recovery. ."], "table": [["", "amount ( in millions )"], ["2010 net revenue", "$ 933.6"], ["retail electric price", "-20.1 ( 20.1 )"], ["volume/weather", "-5.2 ( 5.2 )"], ["fuel recovery", "14.8"], ["transmission revenue", "12.4"], ["other", "-2.1 ( 2.1 )"], ["2011 net revenue", "$ 933.4"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Millions)"], ["2010 net revenue", "$933.6"], ["Retail electric price", "(20.1)"], ["Volume/weather", "(5.2)"], ["Fuel recovery", "14.8"], ["Transmission revenue", "12.4"], ["Other", "(2.1)"], ["2011 net revenue", "$933.4"]]}

Question: what as the percent of the net revenue from transmission in 2011
Evidence:
table_5: the transmission revenue of amount ( in millions ) is 12.4 ;
table_7: the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 933.4 ;
Program: divide(12.4, 933.4)
Answer:
str_answer: 1.3%
exe_answer: 0.01328
{"pre_text": ["entergy new orleans , inc .", "management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .", "results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue .", "2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .", "net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .", "following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .", "amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 .", "see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .", "the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 .", "the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset .", "see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. ."], "table": [["", "amount ( in millions )"], ["2010 net revenue", "$ 272.9"], ["retail electric price", "-16.9 ( 16.9 )"], ["net gas revenue", "-9.1 ( 9.1 )"], ["gas cost recovery asset", "-3.0 ( 3.0 )"], ["volume/weather", "5.4"], ["other", "-2.3 ( 2.3 )"], ["2011 net revenue", "$ 247.0"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Millions)"], ["2010 net revenue", "$272.9"], ["Retail electric price", "(16.9)"], ["Net gas revenue", "(9.1)"], ["Gas cost recovery asset", "(3.0)"], ["Volume/weather", "5.4"], ["Other", "(2.3)"], ["2011 net revenue", "$247.0"]]}

Question: what was the average net revenue between 2010 and 2011
Evidence:
table_7: the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 247.0 ;
table_1: the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 272.9 ;
Program: add(272.9, 247.0), add(#0, const_2), divide(#1, const_2)
Answer:
str_answer: 259.95
exe_answer: 260.95
{"pre_text": ["entergy arkansas , inc .", "and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .", "results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense .", "2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses .", "net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .", "following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .", "amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 .", "see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement .", "the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .", "the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. ."], "table": [["", "amount ( in millions )"], ["2010 net revenue", "$ 1216.7"], ["retail electric price", "31.0"], ["ano decommissioning trust", "26.4"], ["transmission revenue", "13.1"], ["volume/weather", "-15.9 ( 15.9 )"], ["net wholesale revenue", "-11.9 ( 11.9 )"], ["capacity acquisition recovery", "-10.3 ( 10.3 )"], ["other", "3.2"], ["2011 net revenue", "$ 1252.3"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Millions)"], ["2010 net revenue", "$1,216.7"], ["Retail electric price", "31.0"], ["ANO decommissioning trust", "26.4"], ["Transmission revenue", "13.1"], ["Volume/weather", "(15.9)"], ["Net wholesale revenue", "(11.9)"], ["Capacity acquisition recovery", "(10.3)"], ["Other", "3.2"], ["2011 net revenue", "$1,252.3"]]}

Question: what is the percent increase in net revenue from 2010 to 2011?
Evidence:
table_1: the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1216.7 ;
table_9: the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1252.3 ;
Program: subtract(1252.3, 1216.7), divide(#0, 1216.7)
Answer:
str_answer: 2.93%
exe_answer: 0.02926
{"pre_text": ["entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .", "results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 242.5 million primarily due to a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts , which resulted in a $ 422 million income tax benefit .", "the net income effect was partially offset by a $ 199 million regulatory charge , which reduced net revenue , because a portion of the benefit will be shared with customers .", "see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .", "2010 compared to 2009 net income decreased slightly by $ 1.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , a higher effective income tax rate , and higher interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher net revenue .", "net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .", "following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .", "amount ( in millions ) ."], "post_text": ["the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 .", "see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .", "the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective may 2011 .", "see note 2 to the financial statements for discussion of the formula rate plan increase. ."], "table": [["", "amount ( in millions )"], ["2010 net revenue", "$ 1043.7"], ["mark-to-market tax settlement sharing", "-195.9 ( 195.9 )"], ["retail electric price", "32.5"], ["volume/weather", "11.6"], ["other", "-5.7 ( 5.7 )"], ["2011 net revenue", "$ 886.2"]], "table_ori": [["", "Amount (In Millions)"], ["2010 net revenue", "$1,043.7"], ["Mark-to-market tax settlement sharing", "(195.9)"], ["Retail electric price", "32.5"], ["Volume/weather", "11.6"], ["Other", "(5.7)"], ["2011 net revenue", "$886.2"]]}

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue from 2010 to 2011?
Evidence:
table_1: the 2010 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 1043.7 ;
table_6: the 2011 net revenue of amount ( in millions ) is $ 886.2 ;
Program: subtract(886.2, 1043.7), divide(#0, 1043.7)
Answer:
str_answer: -15.1%
exe_answer: -0.15091