{"pre_text": ["entergy gulf states , inc .", "management's financial discussion and analysis ."], "post_text": ["the volume/weather variance was due to higher electric sales volume in the service territory .", "billed usage increased a total of 517 gwh in the residential and commercial sectors .", "the increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage of 470 gwh due to the loss of two large industrial customers to cogeneration .", "the customers accounted for approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of entergy gulf states' net revenue in 2002 .", "in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend .", "the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co- op customers and also to affiliated systems related to entergy's generation resource planning .", "the base rate decreases were effective june 2002 and january 2003 , both in the louisiana jurisdiction .", "the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life .", "in 2002 , a gain of $ 15.2 million was recognized for the louisiana portion of the 1988 nelson units 1 and 2 sale .", "entergy gulf states received approval from the lpsc to discontinue applying amortization of the gain against recoverable fuel , resulting in the recognition of the deferred gain in income .", "rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2003 compared to 2002 for potential rate actions and refunds .", "gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 440.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions .", "fuel and purchased power expenses increased $ 471.1 million due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power .", "other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 22.5 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in nuclear material and labor costs due to reduced staff in 2004. ."], "table": [["", "( in millions )"], ["2002 net revenue", "$ 1130.7"], ["volume/weather", "17.8"], ["fuel write-offs in 2002", "15.3"], ["net wholesale revenue", "10.2"], ["base rate decreases", "-23.3 ( 23.3 )"], ["nisco gain recognized in 2002", "-15.2 ( 15.2 )"], ["rate refund provisions", "-11.3 ( 11.3 )"], ["other", "-14.1 ( 14.1 )"], ["2003 net revenue", "$ 1110.1"]], "table_ori": [["", "(In Millions)"], ["2002 net revenue", "$1,130.7"], ["Volume/weather", "17.8"], ["Fuel write-offs in 2002", "15.3"], ["Net wholesale revenue", "10.2"], ["Base rate decreases", "(23.3)"], ["NISCO gain recognized in 2002", "(15.2)"], ["Rate refund provisions", "(11.3)"], ["Other", "(14.1)"], ["2003 net revenue", "$1,110.1"]]}

Question: what were are the deferred fuel costs as a percentage of the total fuel write-offs in 2002?
Evidence:
table_3: the fuel write-offs in 2002 of ( in millions ) is 15.3 ;
text_6: in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend .
Program: divide(8.9, 15.3)
Answer:
str_answer: 58.2%
exe_answer: 0.5817