Lok Sabha Question No. 190 (STARRED), answered on 2016-03-10
Subject: Implementation of Urban Haat Scheme
Ministry: TEXTILES
Asked by: KALIKESH NARAYAN SINGH DEO, ARJUN RAM  MEGHWAL

## LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO.*190 TO BE ANSWERED ON 10.03.2016

## IMPLEMENTATION OF URBAN HAAT SCHEME

*190. SHRI KALIKESH N. SINGH DEO: SHRI ARJUN MEGHWAL:

## Will the Minister of TEXTILES वस्त्र मंरी

be pleased to state:

- (a) the number of Urban Haats sanctioned and functioning along with their sales and profit at present, State-wise;
- (b) whether  the  Urban  Haats  have  been  successful  in  achieving  their objectives,  if  so,  the  present  status  of  implementation  of  the  Urban  Haat Scheme along with the target fixed for generation of employment opportunities thereunder, State-wise;
- (c) whether the Government proposes to involve the private participation in the setting up or maintenance of Urban Haats, if so, the details thereof; and
- (d) whether the  Government has received proposals  for  establishment  of Urban Haats in various States, if so, the details thereof and the action taken by the Government thereon, State-wise?

## उत्तर

## ANSWER

## वस्त्र राज् य मंरी (स्त्वतंर प्रभार) (श्री संतोष क ु मार गंगवार)

MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) IN THE MINISTRY OF TEXTILES (SHRI SANTOSH KUMAR GANGWAR)

- (a) to (d): A statement is laid on the Table of the House.

## STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PARTS (a) TO (d) OF LOK  SABHA  STARRED  QUESTION  NO.*190  FOR  ANSWER  ON 10.03.2016.

(a): The  number  of  Urban  Haats  sanctioned    is  at Annexure-A .    The Urban  Haats  are  being  maintained  by  State  Agencies  on  no  profit  no  loss basis.

(b): Yes, Madam.  The present status of implementation of the Urban Haat Scheme is as per Annexure-A. No  target  has  been  fixed for generation of employment opportunities.

(c): No, Madam.

(d): Yes, Madam.  The details of proposals received for establishment of Urban Haat in various states is at Annexure-B.

## Annexure-A referred to in reply to part (a) & (b) of Lok Sabha Starred Question No.*190  for answer on 10.03.2016.

## State-wise Urban Haats sanctioned and functioning in the country.

| SN   | State          | Place                                                          | Year of Sanction                                            | Amount Released (In Lakhs)    | Status                                                                |
|------|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.   | Andhra Pradesh | 1. Tirupati 2. Kakinada 3. Eluru                               | 1999-2000 2013-2014 2015-2016                               | 58.45 84.00 78.60             | Functional Under progress Under progress                              |
| 2.   | Chhattisgarh   | Raipur                                                         | 2001-2002                                                   | 52.50                         | Functional                                                            |
| 3.   | Delhi          | 1. INA, Dilli Haat 2. Pitampura Haat.                          | 2006-2007 2004-2005                                         | 70.00 70.00                   | Functional Functional                                                 |
| 4.   | Gujarat        | 1. Bhuj 2. Ahmedabad                                           | 2002-2003 1998-1999                                         | 49.70 44.62                   | Functional Functional                                                 |
| 5.   | Haryana        | Karnal                                                         | 1999-2000                                                   | 43.05                         | Functional                                                            |
| 6.   | Jharkhand      | Hazaribag                                                      | 2002-2003                                                   | 52.50                         | Under progress                                                        |
| 7.   | Jammu& Kashmir | 1. Srinagar 2. Jammu                                           | 2001-2002 1999-2000                                         | 52.50 47.95                   | Functional Functional                                                 |
| 8.   | Karnataka      | 1. Mysore 2. Mangalore                                         | 2002-2003 2008-2009                                         | 68.60 78.75                   | Functional Under progress                                             |
| 9.   | Madhya Pradesh | 1. Bhopal 2. Indore                                            | 2001-2002 2004-2005                                         | 63.00 52.50                   | Functional Under progress                                             |
| 10.  | Maharashtra    | Navi Mumbai                                                    | 2004-2005                                                   | 78.75                         | Functional                                                            |
| 11.  | Manipur        | Imphal                                                         | 2010-2011                                                   | 52.50                         | Under progress                                                        |
| 12.  | Nagaland       | Dimapur                                                        | 2003-2004                                                   | 34.76                         | Functional                                                            |
| 13.  | Orissa         | 1. Bhubaneswar 2. Konark 3. Puri                               | 1998-1999 2003-2004 2003-2004                               | 61.03 35.00 70.00             | Functional Functional Functional                                      |
| 14.  | Rajasthan      | 1. Ajmer 2. Jodhpur 3. Jaipur                                  | 2005-2006 2000-2001 2001-2002                               | 52.50 70.00 52.50             | Functional Functional Functional                                      |
| 15.  | Tamilnadu      | 1. Kanyakumari 2. Mamallapuram                                 | 2006-2007 2015-2016                                         | 52.50 83.80                   | Under progress Under progress                                         |
| 16.  | Tripura        | Agartala                                                       | 2000-2001                                                   | 23.62                         | Under progress                                                        |
| 17.  | Uttar Pradesh  | 1. Varanasi 2. Agra 3. Bareilly 4. Rampur 5. Ayodhya 6. Jhansi | 2002-2003 2001-2002 2005-2006 2005-2006 2010-2011 2006-2007 | 51.19 23.80 70.00 70.00 51.34 | Functional Functional Functional Functional Under Progress Functional |
| 18.  | West Bengal    | 1. Durgapur 2. Shantiniketan                                   | 2007-2008 2010-2011                                         | 26.50 52.50 52.50             | Functional Functional                                                 |
|      | Total :-       | 36                                                             |                                                             |                               | 1. Functional 26 2.Under Progress 10                                  |

## Annexure-B referred to in reply to part (b) of Lok Sabha Starred Question No.*190 for answer on 10.03.2016.

## Status of proposals received from various states for setting up of Urban Haats.

|   SN | State          | Implementing Agency                                               | Venue                 | Year of Sanction   | Amount Released (In Lakhs)   | Status                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|------|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------------------|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|    1 | Andhra Pradesh | Shilparamam, Hyderabad                                            | Kakinada              | 2013-2014          | 84.00                        | Under Progress                                                                                                                                                                           |
|    2 | Tamil Nadu     | Tamilnadu Handicrafts Development Corporation, Chennai            | Mamlapuram, (Chennai) | 2015-2016          | 83.80                        | Under Progress                                                                                                                                                                           |
|    3 | Rajasthan      | Udhyam Protsahan Sansthan, Jaipur                                 | 1. Sikar 2. Alwar     | -                  | -                            | 1. Sikar Urban Haat's construction work was at final stage, hence not considered. 2. Considered subject to commitment from the State Government regarding share of State Govt. and land. |
|    4 | Karnataka      | Karnatak Handlooms Development Corporation, Bengeluru             | Hubli                 | -                  | -                            | Considered subject to commitment from the State Government regarding share of State Govt.                                                                                                |
|    5 | Nagaland       | Department of Industries& |Commerce, Kohima, Nagaland        | Kohima                | -                  | -                            | Not Considered because absence of no representative from the State Govt. in the high level screening committee.                                                                          |
|    6 | Manipur        | Manipur Handloom &Handicraft Development Corporation, Imphal.     | Bishnupur (Imphal)    |                    | -                            | Not Considered because absence of no representative from the State Govt. in the high level screening committee.                                                                          |
|    7 | Chhattisgarh   | Chhattisgarh Hastshilp Board, Raipur.                             | Dongergarh            | -                  | -                            | Considered subject to commitment from the State Government regarding share of State Govt.                                                                                                |
|    8 | Delhi          | Delhi Tourism& Transportation Development Corporation, New Delhi. | Janakpuri             | -                  | -                            | Not considered. Since the Urban Haat, Janakpuri has already been completed.                                                                                                              |

*****