Lok Sabha Question No. 129 (STARRED), answered on 2023-02-10
Subject: Per Capita Expenditure under Ayushman Bharat Yojana
Ministry: HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
Asked by: Debasree Chaudhuri

## GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

## LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 129 TO BE ANSWERED ON THE 10 TH  FEBRUARY, 2023

## PER CAPITA EXPENDITURE UNDER AYUSHMAN BHARAT YOJANA

## *129. MS. DEBASREE CHAUDHURI:

Will the Minister of HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE be pleased to state:

- (a) the budget allocated under Ayushman Bharat Yojana along with the funds spent out of it during the last five years;
- (b) the number of beneficiaries under the Yojana during the said period, State/UT-wise and year-wise;
- (c) the average per capita expenditure incurred under the Yojana; and
- (d)  the  funds  spent  in  West  Bengal  during  each  of  the  last  five  years  and  the beneficiaries covered thereunder?

## THE MINISTER OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

## ANSWER (DR MANSUKH MANDAVIYA)

- (a) to (  d) A Statement is laid on the Table of the House.

## STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 129 FOR 10 TH  FEBRUARY, 2023

The details of budget allocated and the funds utilized under Ayushman BharatPradhan  Mantri  Jan  Arogya  Yojana  (AB-PMJAY)  during  the  last  five  years  are  as under:

(in crore of rupees)

| Financial Year   |   Budget Estimate |   Revised Estimate | Funds Utilized             |
|------------------|-------------------|--------------------|----------------------------|
| 2018-19          |              2400 |               2160 | 1849.50                    |
| 2019-20          |              6400 |               3200 | 2992.90                    |
| 2020-21          |              6400 |               3100 | 2544.10                    |
| 2021-22          |              6400 |               3199 | 2940.60                    |
| 2022-23          |              6412 |               6412 | 4580.10 (as on 02.02.2023) |

State/UT-wise  and  year-wise  details  of  total  number  of  authorized  hospital admissions under the scheme since its inception are at Annexure.

As  on  02 nd February  2023,  a  total  number  of  4.34  crore  hospital  admissions worth Rs. 51,749.40 crore have been authorized under the scheme. Therefore, average per capita expenditure is Rs. 11,924 under the scheme.

The scheme was implemented in the State of West Bengal from 23.09.2018 to 10.01.2019.  An  amount of Rs. 31.28 crore  was  released  as  Central  share  to  the  State Government. The State Government withdrew from the scheme on 10.01.2019. A total number of 1,11,89,727 families are eligible to avail benefits under the scheme.

Annexure State/UT-wise & year-wise details of authorized hospital admissions under AB-PMJAY

| State/UT                    | 2018-19   | 2019-20   | 2020-21   | 2021-22   | 2022-23   |
|-----------------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
| Andaman And Nicobar Islands | 14        | 151       | 342       | 838       | 586       |
| Andhra Pradesh              | 139,931   | 654,946   | 692,364   | 975,502   | 375,135   |
| Arunachal Pradesh           | 375       | 1,345     | 84        | 189       | 1,053     |
| Assam                       | 32,702    | 90,173    | 92,761    | 175,949   | 192,524   |
| Bihar                       | 18,503    | 155,023   | 88,776    | 116,423   | 173,119   |
| Chandigarh                  | 273       | 3,228     | 5,375     | 8,349     | 8,240     |
| Chhattisgarh                | 230,982   | 636,102   | 497,229   | 897,690   | 1,073,140 |
| DNH&DD                      | 7,675     | 31,532    | 18,944    | 20,622    | 17,872    |
| Goa                         | 9,723     | 374       | 139       | 167       | 344       |
| Gujarat                     | 314,087   | 1,140,221 | 825,702   | 566,816   | 747,928   |
| Haryana                     | 10,427    | 95,598    | 138,792   | 185,271   | 210,893   |
| Himachal Pradesh            | 8,290     | 46,851    | 29,228    | 47,498    | 52,695    |
| Jammu And Kashmir           | 6,278     | 67,152    | 68,207    | 251,413   | 323,071   |
| Jharkhand                   | 107,125   | 407,541   | 298,084   | 326,699   | 328,814   |
| Karnataka                   | 116,134   | 566,707   | 654,601   | 1,092,856 | 1,006,129 |
| Kerala                      | -         | 974,864   | 1,043,792 | 1,698,861 | 1,044,696 |
| Ladakh                      | -         | -         | -         | 599       | 5,811     |
| Lakshadweep                 | -         | 1         | -         | 67        | 327       |
| Madhya Pradesh              | 42,533    | 268,875   | 381,554   | 708,248   | 1,011,638 |
| Maharashtra                 | 108,067   | 214,343   | 150,023   | 136,646   | 97,301    |
| Manipur                     | 1,482     | 12,615    | 16,361    | 24,064    | 32,595    |
| Meghalaya                   | 1,122     | 124,434   | 123,734   | 145,307   | 161,350   |
| Mizoram                     | 7,067     | 27,621    | 16,986    | 13,866    | 19,352    |
| Nagaland                    | 262       | 10,122    | 7,357     | 5,654     | 9,663     |
| Puducherry                  | -         | 1,368     | 2,587     | 11,926    | 19,813    |
| Punjab                      | -         | 196,594   | 422,815   | 536,032   | 235,416   |
| Rajasthan                   | -         | 925,684   | 410,464   | 1,226,774 | 1,366,789 |
| Sikkim                      | 9         | 1,213     | 2,022     | 2,872     | 3,801     |
| Tamil Nadu                  | 380,070   | 815,779   | 1,894,993 | 4,494,393 | 1,010,538 |
| Telangana                   | -         | -         | -         | 272,588   | 381,663   |
| Tripura                     | 7,763     | 50,967    | 30,130    | 46,173    | 64,106    |
| Uttar Pradesh               | 65,920    | 283,505   | 318,776   | 501,825   | 665,943   |
| Uttarakhand                 | 20,321    | 129,950   | 121,628   | 182,240   | 212,259   |

Note: Above list does not include the State/UT of West Bengal, Odisha and NCT of Delhi as they are not implementing the scheme.

*****