Lok Sabha Question No. 2173 (UNSTARRED), answered on 2020-09-23
Subject: Use of Diesel Cars
Ministry: ENVIRONMENT,  FORESTS AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Asked by: K. Shanmuga Sundaram

## GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE

## LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION No. 2173

TO BE ANSWERED ON 23.09.2020

## Use of Diesel Cars

## 2173.   SHRI SHANMUGA SUNDARAM K:

Will the Minister of ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE be pleased to state:

- (a) whether  the  Government  has  taken  note  of  the  fact  that  the  Environment  Pollution Prevention & Control Authority has made a plea before the Apex Court to stop the use of diesel cars in Delhi; and
- (b) if so, the details of the suggestions given by Central Pollution Control Board?

## ANSWER

## MINISTER OF STATE  IN  THE  MINISTRY  OF  ENVIRONMENT,  FOREST  AND CLIMATE CHANGE (SHRI BABUL SUPRIYO)

- (a): Environment Pollution (Prevention and Control) Authority- (EPCA)  in report no. 76 titled 'Report on implementation of the Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP) and learning from  first  smog  emergency  of  2017'  submitted  to  the  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court,  mentioned about  ban  on  all  diesel  vehicles  through  implementation  of  sticker  system  as  one  of  the measures that can bring immediate relief during the smog episodes ( Annexure I ).

The matter was heard by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 13.8.2018 and Union of India and SIAM informed about concurrence on the suggestion of implementation of color-coded system. The copy of the order passed  by the Hon'ble Supreme  is placed as Annexure II . Stickers are being affixed through vehicle manufacturers and their dealers but there is little progress  with  regard  to  old  vehicles.  Accordingly,  EPCA  in  September  2019  had  filed  a Report No. 103 'Delay in implementation of colour-coded stickers on vehicles as directed by the  Hon'ble  Court  vide  its  order  dated  13.8.2018'  in  the  Hon'ble  Supreme  Court  (copy enclosed as Annexure III).

- (b) The ban on operation of BS VI Diesel vehicles may not be required in view of the similar mass emission standards for particulate matter as that of petrol/ CNG vehicles.

****

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

## Environment Pollution (Prevention & Control) Authority for the National Capital Region

Report No. 76 November 10, 2017

## Report on implementation of the Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP) and learning from first smog emergency of 2017

## Background

In November 2016, Delhi had its worst smog emergency in 17 years. PM2.5 reached 14 times the standard on November 5, 2016 -a situation, which was both alarming and dangerous for human health. EPCA had filed an urgent report to the Hon'ble Supreme Court on th e need for short-term emergency action and st rict enforcement of Hon'ble Supr eme Court directions for effective control of toxic and dangerous air pollution.

On November 10, 2016, t he Hon'ble Court directed the Central Pollution Control Board and EPCA to frame smog alert system. The system was presented to the Hon'ble Court, based on the best experiences of such schemes in the world. On December 2, 2016 t he Hon'ble Court asked the Ministry of Environment and Forests and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) to notify the plan. On January 12, 2017 the Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP) for NCR was notified.

Under GRAP, there are 4 stages of pollution -Moderate to Poor, Very Poor, Severe and Severe+ or Emergency and action are listed that need to be undertaken as the levels are breached. GRAP is designed as a response plan to rising pollution and not a substitute for long-term actions .

Under the notification and directions for the Hon'ble Supreme Court the following system has been set up to implement GRAP:

1. Expansion of the air pollution monitoring network so that NCR is covered and there is information about the level of pollution and the impact on human health.
2. The Air Quality Index (AQI) has been established with links to the health advisory. The Index automatically takes the readings of the connected stations and puts out a daily index on the state of pollution. By October

- 2017 25 stations had been linked (https://app.cpcbccr.com/AQI/) and it is expected that by the end of December another 20 stations will be added in Delhi and UP and by end of January another 8 stations from Haryana.
3. A task force, headed by CPCB has been set up to meet regularly (daily during the high pollution period) to assess the pollution levels and to deliberate with the officials of the Indian Metrological Department (IMD) on forecasts. This task force, in turn informs, EPCA on recommendations for action.
4. It has been agreed that between March to October, when pollution levels are low, the measures listed under the Moderate to Poor category would be in effect.
5. In this period, EPCA held a number of meetings in Delhi and in cities of NCR to apprise officials of GRAP and to ensure that they understand the need for preparedness as pollution rises ( see attached minutes January 20 to November 7, 2017 ).

## 2.  Status of implementation of GRAP: October 2017 to current

1. On October 17, 2017 EPCA decided to impose the ' Very Poor and Severe ' Category AQI in NCR. The levels of pollution were in the poor and very poor category, but this was done as a precautionary step in view of impending winter and inversion.
2. The decisions were taken and directives issued:
- a. Closure of Badarpur Power Plant from October 17 to March 15;
- b. Closure of Brick kilns that had not converted to cleaner zig zag technology;
- c. Ban on the use of generator sets (in Delhi). The decision to ban generator sets in NCR could not be taken in view of the enormous electricity shortage.
- d. Directions to start preparedness for actions on other measures like closure of hot mix plants, stone crushers, thermal power plants, parking fee enhancement, intensification of public transport etc.
3. Between October 17 and November 7, 2017, CPCB task force and EPCA convened regularly to assess the situation. There were huge representations for granting exemptions on use of diesel generator sets, including from BCCI, which were turned down. The only exemption granted was for the event organised by the Ministry of Food Processing because no alternative power could be provided. EPCA convened

- meetings with power departments to issue guidelines to grant temporary connections so that generator set use can be stopped (see minutes of meeting held on October 31, 2017).
4. On the morning of November 7, 2017 , CPCB task force informed EPCA that pollution levels had dipped alarmingly overnight and that the NCR and city were in the severe category.
5. In the same day (November 7, 2017) the concentration of PM 2.5 in Delhi was 537 µ/m 3 which is 9 times the 24-hour average standard. In the AQI the level was severe . EPCA convened a meeting with all stakeholders and decided to issue the following directives to state governments of Delhi, Haryana, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh (see attached letters):
- a. Closure of all brick kiln, other than those that have been certified to have converted to zig zag. As of date, not a single brick kiln has been verified. All brick kilns in NCR will be shut.
- b. Closure of all hot mix plants
- c. Closure of all stone crushers
- d. Immediately intensify public transport service, by ensuring there are more buses on road, which are run with reliable service.
- e. Immediately increase frequency of service, including deploying more coaches and introduction of lower fares during off peak hours during this severe period
- f. All state pollution boards to immediately impose fines on all road constructing agencies where there are inadequate dust control measures. Taking the provision of C&D rules, which allow for penalty up to Rs 5 lakh for construction dust mismanagement, EPCA is directing for a fine of Rs 50,000 for penalty per day per stretch for road dust.
- g. Intensification of mechanized road sweeper and sprinkling of water
- h. Continue ban on generator sets in Delhi, with exceptions only as defined by DPCC for essential services
- i. Immediate enhancement of parking fee by 4 times and deposit of additional funds in dedicated parking fund with municipalities
- j. Immediate stop all use of unapproved fuels in Delhi and all use of coal and firewood in hotels and eateries
- k. Intensify traffic management in all hot spots and increase deployment of traffic police across the city.

- l. Intensity the enforcement of non-destined goods traffic into Delhi by physically checking all vehicles and turning them back and putting out public announcement of the numbers turned back.
6. EPCA also informed the state governments that it was monitoring the situation carefully in coordination with the CPCB task force and would inform them of any further measures that would need to be taken. It took the view (as communicated to governments) that it would not direct for closure of schools. Instead it directed governments to inform schools to maintain a strict health advisory and to limit all exposure of children to outdoor activities.
7. On November 8 , the level of pollution spiked further to 676 µ/m 3 , which is 11 times the standard . EPCA directed Delhi governments to:
- a. Stop entry of truck traffic into Delhi (except essential commodities)
- b. Stop construction activities

It also directed Haryana, UP, Rajasthan to stop construction activities till further notice in the NCR districts.

1. On November 9 , the CPCB-task force informed EPCA that weather conditions were expected to improve over the weekend (November 1112) and so there was no need to advice on further action. EPCA took the view that the administrations already have a major challenge to implement the above directions, which would bring substantial benefits and therefore, given this information, no further directions would be issued. The situation remained the same at the time of filing this report in the Hon'ble Court (3 pm, November 10, 2017). It has also been agreed that in future, decisions for actions to be taken, will not depend on the AQI but on the concentration of pollutants.

## 4. Learnings from this First Smog Episode of 2017 and what needs to be done better to implement GRAP in such periods

There is no doubt that GRAP has provided an important framework for actions that need to be taken during pollution emergencies. Last year, 2016, when a similar situation had arisen, there was little information about the state of air pollution (monitoring stations were not available or online); there was confusion about the health impacts (health advisory was not linked to pollution AQI) and most importantly there was complete policy paralysis about the response actions (there was no list of what needed to be done by whom).

This year, within a matter of hours of pollution levels increasing to alarming levels, actions have been directed. All state governments have within 24 hours of receiving the directives have taken meetings and asked for compliance.

But this first 'use' of GRAP provides important learnings that must be immediately implemented to further strengthen the system for this remaining winter period:

1. The need for better weather forecasts so that agencies have advance notice of the measures that need to be taken. This year, the last information EPCA had on the prevailing weather conditions was on November 6, 2017. This did not provide any warning of the kind of anticyclonic weather disturbance that was happening in the upper circulatory system and the impending problems it would bring.

EPCA is now given to understand from weather experts, including IMD, that the situation of the past few days was unprecedented. Two air circulatory systems -one bringing pollutants from crop burning in Punjab and Haryana, (including according to one theory dust from multiday dust storm in Iraq, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia) and the other bringing moisture from the east collided over Delhi region. This formed a cloud of pollutants, trapped in moisture, which combined with near calm wind conditions at the ground-level, suffocated the region.

EPCA had no advance warning of this weather conditions. It only has information about the current state of pollution through the real-time monitoring from the air quality index. But across the world, where such smog alert systems are in place, a robust and reliable weather forecasting system is essential for action.

EPCA is now working with the Ministry of Earth Science and IMD to see how this forecast and predictions can be improved. It will keep the Hon'ble Court informed about these developments.

2. The need for a vastly strengthened system of health advisories to people to take preventive action . Currently the system is web-based and information on the level of pollution (AQI) and health impacts is provided. But there is a need to have wider dissemination of this information to the general public, through APPs or other means.

- EPCA will discuss this with MoEF&CC, CPCB and state governments to see how su ch a system can be put in place and will keep the Hon'ble Court informed.
3. The need for deterrence so that implementation is strengthened . It is clear that any direction is as good as its implementation. Given all the challenges of effective governance in our cities, it is clear we need a better system for the implementation of GRAP, during the pollution emergency periods. EPCA will discuss how stronger deterrence can be incorporated in GRAP and get back to the Hon'ble Court on the possible directives needed in this regard.
4. The implementation of the Comprehensive Action Plan for Air Pollution Control f or NCR (with the Hon'ble Court) urgently and with time-bound and accountable schedules. This long-term plan for pollution abatement is essential for GRAP to work . This is the biggest Achilles heel of GRAP as without long-term and decisive measures to combat pollution, GRAP will remain weak. For instance:
- a. Under GRAP (very poor and severe category) it is directed that governments must intensify public transport and also increase parking fees. These measures are recommended so that movement by private vehicles is reduced for pollution control. But effective implementation of this requires a greatly enhanced public transport system. Currently, in Delhi, there are fewer buses on road than there were 3 years ago. The situation across NCR is also very unsatisfactory.
- b. Under GRAP (very poor category) generator sets are banned. But there is a huge power shortage (not in terms of generation but supply) in the districts of NCR. Therefore, mandating this will not work.
5. The need to include further measures that can bring immediate relief during the smog episodes . The fact is that while crop burning from Punjab and Haryana is a contributory factor it is not the only problem during winter in this region. Last year adverse weather and lack of longterm action resulted in similar smog episodes during December and January. So, there may be a need for additional emergency measures like:

- a. Closure of all coal based thermal plants and industries in the region. Currently, the Supreme Court has imposed a ban on pet coke and FO, but there may be a requirement to temporarily halt all other air polluting sources during peak smog periods.
- b. Ban on all diesel vehicles on roads/and or stickers of fuel and age on all vehicles through PUC so that based on level of threat, categories of vehicles can be prohibited from plying. This however, will require intervention from the relevant ministries so that the stickers are tamper-proof.

EPCA will discuss these and more such measures with MoEF&CC and the CPCB task force next week and inform t he Hon'ble Court of any directions required.

ITEM NO.54               COURT NO.3               SECTION PIL-W

## S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition(s)(Civil)  No(s).13029/1985

M.C. MEHTA                                         Petitioner(s)

## VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                              Respondent(s)

(1)   IN   RE:   REPORT   NO.   71   AND   78   SUBMITTED   BY   EPCA (REGARDING COMPREHENSIVE ACTION PLAN FOR AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AND SUPPLEMENTARY   REPORT   ON   THE   COMPREHENSIVE   ACTION   PLAN   WITH TIMELINES)

- (2) IA NOS. 112348 AND 112352/2018 (APPLNS. FOR IMPLEADMENT AND DIRECTIONS ON BEHALF OF TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTORS PVT. LTD. )

## WITH

W.P.(C) No. 1109/2017 (PIL-W)

(FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON  ON IA 119376/2017)

Date : 13-08-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.

## CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. (A.C.)[NP]

Ms. Aparajita Singh, Adv. (A.C.)

Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv.(A.C.)

Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, Adv.(A.C.)

Petitioner-in-person

Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG

Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG

Mr. S.W.A. Qadri, Adv.

Mr. D.L. Chidanand, Adv.

Mr. Devasis Bharuka, Adv.

Ms. Suhasini Sen, Adv.

Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Adv.

For Petitioner(s)

For Respondent(s)

112348 & 112352

Mr. Raj Bahadur, Adv.

Ms. Snidha Mehra, Adv.

Mr. G.S. Makker, Advocate

Mr. Ajay Bansal, AAG

Mr. Anil Grover, AAG

Ms. Noopur Singhal, Adv.

Mr. Gaurav Yadava, Adv.

Ms. Veena Bansal, Adv.

Mr. Sanjay Kr. Visen, Advocate

Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv.

Mr. Abhishek, Advocate

Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG

Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv.

Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv.

Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, Adv.

Ms. Indira Bhakar, Adv.

Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advocate

Mr. B.V. Balramdas, Advocate

Ms. Anil Katiyar, Advocate

Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Sandeep Narain, Adv.

Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Adv.

Ms. Anjali Agarwal, Adv.

for M/S S Narain And Co.

Mr. Rohit K. Singh, Advocate

Mr. Rohit Narayan, Advocate

Mr. Faisal Sherwani, Advocate

Mr. S.N. Terdel, Advocate

Mr. Akshat Hansaria, Adv.

Mr. Akash Chatterjee, Adv.

Mr. D.N. Goburdhun, Adv.

Ms. Pallavi Chopra, Adv.

Mr. Ashwini Mata, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Vijay Sondhi, Adv.

Mr. Nakul Sachdeva, Adv.

Mr. Aakasshan Sahay, Adv.

Ms. Nayamat Sistani, Adv.

IOCL

Mr. Rahul Narayan, Adv.

Ms. Mala Narayan, Adv.

Mr. Shashwat Goel, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

## REPORT NO. 71 AND 78

## In Re: Stickers for vehicles

We   have   heard   learned amicus   curiae as   well   as learned Additional Solicitor General and learned counsel for SIAM.

The suggestion given by learned amicus curiae was to the effect that colour stickers should be placed on the windshield of the vehicles to give an indication of the nature of fuel being used.

The   suggestion   given   by   learned amicus   curiae is acceptable both to learned Additional Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the Union of India as well as to learned counsel for SIAM.

It is agreed that a hologram based sticker of light blue colour should be used for petrol/CNG vehicles and a hologram based sticker of orange colour should be used for diesel vehicles.

Of course, this would be applicable only for the NCR

Region.

It   is   submitted   by   learned   counsel   appearing   on behalf of Toyota Kirloskar Motors Pvt. Ltd. that so far as strong hybrid vehicles are concerned, they should fall on the same category as electric vehicles.

Learned   Additional   Solicitor   General   may   consider providing for a green colour sticker for strong hybrid vehicles.  A decision in this regard may be taken within two weeks.

In the meanwhile, the decision for stickers of light blue colour and orange colour should be implemented in the NCR Region by 2 nd  October, 2018 latest.

## In re: Recommendation Nos.2.2.1 and 2.2.2

As regards, Recommendation Nos.2.2.1 and 2.2.2, list the matter on 17 th  August, 2018.

## IA   NOS.   112348   AND   112352/2018   (APPLNS.   FOR IMPLEADMENT AND DIRECTIONS ON BEHALF OF TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTORS PVT. LTD. )

In view of the order passed above, these applications are disposed of.

| (SANJAY KUMAR-I)   | (KAILASH CHANDER)   |
|--------------------|---------------------|
| AR-CUM-PS          | COURT MASTER        |

ITEM NO.54               COURT NO.3               SECTION PIL-W

## S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A

## RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition(s)(Civil)  No(s).13029/1985

M.C. MEHTA                                         Petitioner(s)

## VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                              Respondent(s)

(3)   IN   RE:   REPORT   NOS.   86   AND   88   SUBMITTED   BY   EPCA (REGARDING STATUS OF FUNDS AND HYDROGEN FUEL-CELL BUSES)

Date : 13-08-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. (A.C.)[NP]

Ms. Aparajita Singh, Adv. (A.C.)

Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv.(A.C.)

Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, Adv.(A.C.)

Petitioner-in-person

Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG

Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG

Mr. S.W.A. Qadri, Adv.

Mr. D.L. Chidanand, Adv.

Mr. Devasis Bharuka, Adv.

Ms. Suhasini Sen, Adv.

Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Adv.

Mr. Raj Bahadur, Adv.

Ms. Snidha Mehra, Adv.

Mr. G.S. Makker, Advocate

Mr. Ajay Bansal, AAG

Mr. Anil Grover, AAG

Ms. Noopur Singhal, Adv.

Mr. Gaurav Yadava, Adv.

Ms. Veena Bansal, Adv.

For Petitioner(s)

For Respondent(s)

112348 & 112352

IOCL

Mr. Sanjay Kr. Visen, Advocate

Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv.

Mr. Abhishek, Advocate

Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG

Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv.

Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv.

Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, Adv.

Ms. Indira Bhakar, Adv.

Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advocate

Mr. B.V. Balramdas, Advocate

Ms. Anil Katiyar, Advocate

Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Sandeep Narain, Adv.

Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Adv.

Ms. Anjali Agarwal, Adv.

for M/S S Narain And Co.

Mr. Rohit K. Singh, Advocate

Mr. Rohit Narayan, Advocate

Mr. Faisal Sherwani, Advocate

Mr. S.N. Terdel, Advocate

Mr. Akshat Hansaria, Adv.

Mr. Akash Chatterjee, Adv.

Mr. D.N. Goburdhun, Adv.

Ms. Pallavi Chopra, Adv.

Mr. Ashwini Mata, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Vijay Sondhi, Adv.

Mr. Nakul Sachdeva, Adv.

Mr. Aakasshan Sahay, Adv.

Ms. Nayamat Sistani, Adv.

Mr. Rahul Narayan, Adv.

Ms. Mala Narayan, Adv.

Mr. Shashwat Goel, Adv.

## IN   RE:   REPORT   NOS.   86   AND   88   SUBMITTED   BY   EPCA (HYDROGEN FUEL-CELL BUSES)

Pursuant   to   our   order   dated   23 rd July,   2018,   a positive   affidavit   has   been   filed   by   the   Indian   Oil Corporation Ltd..

It is stated in the affidavit that a study is being carried out by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. for using a mixture of hydrogen and CNG as fuel for buses.   It is further stated that the study will take about six months or so with implementation thereafter as a pilot project. It is also stated in the affidavit that an amount of Rs.14   crores   would   be   required   for   implementing   the project towards capital expenditure.

Since   there   is   a   sufficient   amount   lying   in   the Environment Compensation Charge (ECC), an amount of Rs.15 crores may be sanctioned to the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. for carrying out its study and the pilot project.

List the matter on 28 th  November, 2018.

(SANJAY KUMAR-I)

(KAILASH CHANDER)

AR-CUM-PS                          COURT MASTER

ITEM NO.54               COURT NO.3               SECTION PIL-W

## S U P R E M E  C O U R T  O F  I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition(s)(Civil)  No(s).13029/1985

M.C. MEHTA                                         Petitioner(s)

## VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                              Respondent(s)

(4) IA NO. 47751/2017 (APPLN. FOR VACATION OF STAY GRANTED VIDE ORDER DT. 30.4.2010 ON B/O DIRECTORATE OF ESTATES)

Date : 13-08-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.

## CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. (A.C.)[NP]

Ms. Aparajita Singh, Adv. (A.C.)

Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv.(A.C.)

Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, Adv.(A.C.)

Petitioner-in-person

Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG

Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG

Mr. S.W.A. Qadri, Adv.

Mr. D.L. Chidanand, Adv.

Mr. Devasis Bharuka, Adv.

Ms. Suhasini Sen, Adv.

Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Adv.

Mr. Raj Bahadur, Adv.

Ms. Snidha Mehra, Adv.

Mr. G.S. Makker, Advocate

Mr. Ajay Bansal, AAG

Mr. Anil Grover, AAG

Ms. Noopur Singhal, Adv.

Mr. Gaurav Yadava, Adv.

Ms. Veena Bansal, Adv.

For Petitioner(s)

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Sanjay Kr. Visen, Advocate

Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv.

Mr. Abhishek, Advocate

Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG

Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Sandeep Singh, Adv.

Mr. Ankit Raj, Adv.

Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, Adv.

Ms. Indira Bhakar, Adv.

Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advocate

Mr. B.V. Balramdas, Advocate

Ms. Anil Katiyar, Advocate

Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Sandeep Narain, Adv.

Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Adv.

Ms. Anjali Agarwal, Adv.

for M/S S Narain And Co.

Mr. Rohit K. Singh, Advocate

Mr. Rohit Narayan, Advocate

Mr. Faisal Sherwani, Advocate

Mr. S.N. Terdel, Advocate

Mr. Akshat Hansaria, Adv.

Mr. Akash Chatterjee, Adv.

Mr. D.N. Goburdhun, Adv.

Ms. Pallavi Chopra, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

The application is dismissed.

(SANJAY KUMAR-I) (KAILASH CHANDER) AR-CUM-PS                          COURT MASTER

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->

<!-- image -->