Serial Attached SCSI

**Serial Attached SCSI** (**SAS**) is a technology  designed to move data to and from computer storage devices such as hard drives and tape drives. It is a point-to-point serial protocol that replaces the parallel SCSI. SCSI  first appeared in the mid 1980s in corporate data centers. SAS  uses the standard SCSI command set. At present it is slightly slower than the final parallel SCSI implementation, but in 2009 it will double its present speed to 6 Gbit/s. This will permit much higher speed data transfers. The protocol is "downwards"-compatible with second generation SATA drives. These drives may be connected to SAS backplanes (controllers), but SAS drives can not be connected to SATA backplanes.   

The SAS protocol is developed and maintained by the T10 technical committee of the International Committee for Information Technology Standards (INCITS) and promoted by the SCSI Trade Association (SCSITA).

## SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) vs parallel SCSI
* The SAS bus is point-to-point while the SCSI bus is multidrop.  Each SAS device is connected by a dedicated link to the initiator,  unless an expander is used.  If one initiator is connected to one target,  there is no opportunity for contention;  with parallel SCSI,  even this situation could cause contention.
* SAS has no termination issues and does not require terminator packs like parallel SCSI.
* SAS eliminates clock skew.  
* SAS supports up to 16,384 devices through the use of expanders while Parallel SCSI is limited to 8, 16, or 32 devices (including the SCSI controller) on a single channel.
* SAS supports a higher transfer speed (1.5 OR 3.0 Gbit/s) than most parallel SCSI standards. The speed is realized on each initiator-target connection, hence higher throughput whereas in parallel SCSI the speed is shared across the entire multidrop bus.
* SAS controllers are required by the standard to support SATA devices.
* Both SAS and parallel SCSI use the SCSI command-set.

## SAS vs SATA
* SATA devices are uniquely identified by their port number connected to the Host bus adapter while SAS devices are uniquely identified by their World Wide Name (WWN).
* Most SAS drives provide Tagged Command Queuing, while most newer SATA drives provide Native Command Queuing, each of which has its pros and cons.
* SATA follows the ATA command set and thus only supports hard drives and CD/DVD drives. In theory, SAS also supports numerous other devices including scanners and printers. However, this advantage could also be moot, as most such devices have also found alternative paths via such buses as USB, IEEE 1394 (FireWire), and Ethernet.
* SAS hardware allows multipath I/O to devices while SATA (prior to SATA II) does not. Per specification, SATA II makes use of port multipliers to achieve port expansion. Some port multiplier manufacturers have implemented multipath I/O leveraging port multiplier hardware.
* SATA is marketed as a general-purpose successor to Parallel ATA and is now common in the consumer market, while the more expensive SAS is marketed for critical server applications.
* SAS error recovery and reporting utilize SCSI commands which have more functionality than the ATA SMART commands used by SATA drives.
* SAS uses higher signaling voltages (800-1600 mV TX, 275-1600 mV RX) than SATA (400-600 mV TX, 325-600 mV RX). When SAS is mixed with SATA, the SAS drives run at SATA-voltages. One reason for this higher voltage is so SAS may be used in server backplanes.
* Because of its higher signaling voltages, SAS can use cables up to 8&nbsp;m (25&nbsp;ft) long, SATA is limited to 1&nbsp;m (3&nbsp;ft).

## Connectors
The SAS connector is much smaller than traditional parallel SCSI connectors allowing for the small  drives.  SAS supports point data transfer speeds up to 3 Gbit/s, but is expected to reach 12 Gbit/s by the year 2012.  

The physical SAS connector is available in several different variants:

## Other websites
*T10 committee
*SCSI Trade Association
*