Set

, in 1894. Cantor was the first mathematician to talk about sets]]

A **set** is an idea from mathematics. A set has *members* (also called *elements*). A set is defined by its members, so any two sets with the same members are the same (i.e., if set \mathit{X} and set \mathit{Y} have the same members, then *\mathit{X} = \mathit{Y}*).

A set cannot have the same member more than once. Membership is the only thing that matters. For example, there is no order or other difference among the members. *Anything* can be a member of a set, including sets themselves; sets can even contain themselves.

It is very important that sets are defined by their members, not by the properties of their members. A group of elements defined by a property is called a class. All sets are classes, but not all classes are sets. The idea that classes and sets are the same is called naive set theory, and causes many paradoxes such as Russell's paradox. An example of a class that is not a set is "the class of all sets".

## What to do with sets 
Imagine the set is a bag.

### Element of 
Various things can be put into a bag. Later on, a good question would be if a certain thing is in the bag. Mathematicians call this *element of*. Something is an element of a set, if that thing can be found in the respective bag. The symbol used for this is \in:

a \in \mathit{A},

which means that a is in the bag \mathit{A} or a is an element of \mathit{A}.

Unlike a bag, a set can contain at most one item of a given type. So for a set of fruits, it would make no difference if there is one orange, or if there are 10 oranges.

### Empty set 
Like a bag, a set can also be *empty*. The empty set is like an empty bag: it has nothing in it. The "empty set" is also called the *null set* and is represented by the symbol \varnothing.

### Universe 
If we consider, say, some sets of American cars, e.g. a set of all Fords and a set of all Dodges, we may also wish to consider the whole set of American cars. In this case, the set of all American cars would be called a universe.

In other words, a universe is a collection of all the elements one wishes to consider in a given problem. The universe is usually named U.

### Comparing sets 
Two sets can be compared. This is like looking into two different bags. If they contain the same things, they are equal. No matter, in which order these things are.

*For example*, if \mathit{A}=\{\text{Stanford, Stanley}\} and \mathit{B}=\{\text{Stanley, Stanford}\}, the sets are the same.

### Cardinality of a set 
When mathematicians talk about a set, they sometimes want to know how big a set is (or what is the cardinality of the set). They do this by counting how many elements are in the set (how many items are in the bag). For finite sets the cardinality is a simple number. The empty set has a cardinality of 0. The set \{ \text{apple, orange} \} has a cardinality of 2.

Two sets have the same cardinality if we can pair up their elements—if we can join two elements, one from each set. The set \{ \text{apple, orange}\} and the set \{ \text{sun, moon}\} have the same cardinality. E.g., we could pair *apple* with *sun*, and *orange* with *moon*. The order does not matter. It is possible to pair all the elements, and none is left out. But the set \{ \text{dog, cat, bird} \} and the set \{ 5, 6 \} have different cardinality.
If we try to pair them up, we always leave out one animal.

#### Infinite cardinality 
At times cardinality is not a number. Sometimes a set has infinite cardinality. The set of all integers is a set with infinite cardinality. Some sets with infinite cardinality are bigger (have a bigger cardinality) than others. There are more real numbers than there are natural numbers, for example, which means we cannot pair up the set of integers and the set of real numbers, even if we worked forever.

#### Countability 
If you can count the elements of a set, it is called a countable set. Countable sets include all sets with a finite number of members. Countable sets also include some infinite sets, such as the natural numbers. You can count the natural numbers with {1,2,3...}. The natural numbers are nicknamed "the counting numbers", since they are what we usually use to count things with.

An uncountable set is an infinite set that is impossible to count. If we try to count the elements, we will always skip some. It does not matter what step we take. The set of real numbers is an uncountable set. There are many other uncountable sets, even such a small interval like [0, 1].[3]

### Subsets 
If you look at the set A=\{ a, b \} and the set B=\{ a, b, c, d \}, you can see that all elements in the first set are also in the second set. We say: \{ a, b \} is a subset of \{ a, b, c, d \}
As a formula it looks like this:
\{a,b\} \subseteq \{a,b,c,d\}

In general, when all elements of set A are also elements of set B, we call  A a subset of B:
A \subseteq B.

One way of showing a set is by a list of its members, separated by commas, included in braces.
*For example*,
* X=\{1, 2, 3\} is set which has members 1, 2, and 3.

Another way, called the set-builder notation, is by a statement of what is true of the members of the set, like this:
* {*x* | *x* is a natural number & *x*  \empty ,  \varnothing  or  \{\} .

When object *a* is the member of set A it is written as:
* a\in A.
In spoken English, this reads: "*a* is a member of A".
* \mathbb{P}, denoting the set of all primes.
* \mathbb{N}, denoting the set of all natural numbers. That is to say, \mathbb{N} = {1, 2, 3, ...}, or sometimes \mathbb{N} = {0, 1, 2, 3, ...}.
* \mathbb{Z}, denoting the set of all integers (whether positive, negative or zero). So \mathbb{Z} = {..., -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ...}.
* \mathbb{Q}, denoting the set of all rational numbers (that is, the set of all proper and improper fractions). So, \mathbb{Q} = \left\{ \begin{matrix}\frac{a}{b} \end{matrix}| a,b \in \mathbb{Z}, b \neq 0\right\}, meaning all fractions \begin{matrix} \frac{a}{b} \end{matrix} where *a* and *b* are in the set of all integers and *b* is not equal to 0. For example, \begin{matrix} \frac{1}{4} \end{matrix} \in \mathbb{Q} and \begin{matrix}\frac{11}{6} \end{matrix} \in \mathbb{Q}. All integers are in this set since every integer *a* can be expressed as the fraction \begin{matrix} \frac{a}{1} \end{matrix}.
* \mathbb{R}, denoting the set of all real numbers. This set includes all rational numbers, together with all irrational numbers (that is, numbers which cannot be rewritten as fractions, such as \pi, e, and √2).
* \mathbb{C}, denoting the set of all complex numbers.

Each of these sets of numbers has an infinite number of elements, and \mathbb{P} \subset \mathbb{N} \subset \mathbb{Z} \subset \mathbb{Q} \subset \mathbb{R} \subset \mathbb{C}.

## Paradoxes about sets 
The mathematician Bertrand Russell found that there are problems with the informal definition of sets. He stated this in a paradox called ''Russell's paradox*. An easier to understand version, closer to real life, is called the *Barber paradox*.

### The barber paradox 
There is a small town somewhere. In that town, there is a barber. All the men in the town do not like beards, so they either shave themselves, or they go to the barber shop to be shaved by the barber.

We can therefore make a statement about the barber himself: *The barber shaves all men that do not shave themselves. He only shaves those men (since the others shave themselves and do not need a barber to give them a shave).*

This of course raises the question: What does the barber do each morning to look clean-shaven? This is the paradox.

If the barber shaves himself, he cannot be a barber, since a barber does not shave himself.
If he does not shave himself, he falls in the category of those who do not shave themselves, and so, cannot be a barber.

## Related pages 
* Cantor set
* Group theory
* Open set
* Relation
* Set theory

## References 
## Further reading 
The following books explore sets in more detail:

* Halmos, Paul R., *Naive Set Theory*, Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand (1960) 
* Stoll, Robert R., *Set Theory and Logic*, Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications (1979) 
* Allenby, R.B.J.T, *Rings, Fields and Groups'', Leeds, England: Butterworth Heinemann (1991)