Schrödinger's cat

'''Schrödinger's cat'* is a thought experiment about quantum physics. Erwin Schrödinger suggested it in 1935, in reaction to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics. 

Schrödinger wrote:

## Simple explanation 
In simple terms, Schrödinger said that if you place a cat and something that could kill the cat (a radioactive atom) in a box and sealed it, you would not know if the cat were dead or alive until you opened the box, so that until the box was opened, the cat was *both'' "dead and alive". This is a metaphor for subatomic particles which, according to quantum theory, exist in a superposition of states, or multiple simultaneous states, until observation determines a single final state.

## Application to physics 
Physics can be divided into two types; classical physics and quantum mechanics. Classical physics explains most physical interactions, like why a ball bounces when it drops. It can also be used to predict physical interactions, like what will happen when you drop a ball. However, there are some physical interactions which it does not explain; for instance, how light can be turned into electricity. Quantum mechanics provides a way for physicists to explain why these things happen. 

The Copenhagen interpretation is used to explain what is happening to the smallest part of an atom (a sub atomic particle) without looking at it (observing it or measuring it). Mathematics is used to show how likely something is to happen to the particle. A particle could be described as being 50% likely to be in one place at one time, or 50% likely to be in one place at another time. This could also be expressed as a chart (or wave form). This is very convenient when making quantum physics calculations. 

However the only way to be 100% sure of where a particle is, is to observe it. Up until the point that you observe it, the Copenhagen Interpretation says that the particle is there and is not there. It is only when you observe the particle that you know if it's there or not there.  

While this makes sense in quantum physics, it does not make sense in classical (real world) physics.  

Schrödinger wanted to show that this way of thinking about quantum mechanics would lead to absurd situations. He designed a thought experiment. 

*A cat is placed in a room that is separated from the outside world. *

*A Geiger counter which counts the amount of radioactive decay and a little bit of a radioactive element is in the room. *

*Within one hour, one of the atoms of the radioactive material might decay (or break down because the material is not stable), or it may not. *

*If the material breaks down, it will release an atomic particle, which will hit the geiger counter, which will release poison gas, which will kill the cat.*

The question now is: **at the end of the hour, is the cat alive or dead? **Schrödinger says that according to the Copenhagen Interpretation, as long as the door is closed, the cat is dead **and** alive. There is no way to know until the door is opened. But by opening the door, the person is interfering with the experiment. The person and the experiment have to be described with reference to each other.

By *looking* at the experiment the person has influenced the experiment, therefore it may not give us the correct answer. 

The thought experiment was invented by Schrödinger to demonstrate the foolishness of thinking about quantum states for large objects. It has also been referenced many times in pop culture.

The thought experiment was also designed to demonstrate the absurdities of the cat being alive and dead at the same time until observed as a way to debate the idea of the observer effect causing the collapse of the wave function and can also be considered in the simplified thought experiment, if I were to say "I'm thinking of a number between 1 and 100, can you guess which number" then until you start asking questions to narrow it down and observe new information, then you would have to assume I'm thinking of every number at the same time placing my mind in a state of super position but I can assure it is not.

## Related pages 
* Wavefunction collapse

## References