Plautus

**Titus Macchius Plautus** (; c. 254 – 184 BC),  known as **Plautus**, was a playwright in Ancient Rome. He was probably born in Sarsina (a city in Emilia-Romagna). His comedies are among the earliest works of Latin literature that have not been lost. He is also one of the earliest writers of musical theater.

## Biography
Little is known about Plautus' early life. When Plautus was young, he built stages for plays. He also helped change the scenes.

### Plautus and the Gods of Roman Society
H. M. Tolliver talks about the state gods of Rome and what their importance was in the Theatre of Plautus. These gods were an important part of the Romans' lives in Plautus’ time - people were supposed to worship them. Tolliver tells us that the gods were not exactly like the gods worshipped today. They were worshipped but also stood as a national symbol. State religion also served as a political tool. If the gods supported a bad leader, the people should too.

Plautus is sometimes accused of teaching the public indifference and mockery of the gods. Any character in his plays could be compared to a god. Whether to honour a character or to mock him, these references were demeaning to the gods. These references to the gods include a character comparing a mortal woman to a god, or saying he would rather be loved by a woman than by the gods. Pyrgopolynices from *Miles Gloriosus* (vs. 1265), in bragging about his long life, says he was born one day later than Jupiter. In *Pseudolus,* Jupiter is compared to Ballio the pimp. It is not uncommon, either, for a character to scorn the gods. This can be seen in *Poenulus* and *Rudens*.

Usually the only characters that scorn a god are those of low standing, like a pimp. Plautus perhaps does this to further demoralize the characters. Soldiers often bring ridicule among the gods. Young men, meant to represent the upper social class, often make fun of the gods in their remarks. Parasites, pimps, and courtesans often praise the gods with little ceremony. Tolliver argues that drama both reflects and foreshadows social change. It is likely that there was already much skepticism about the gods in Plautus’ time. Plautus did not make up or encourage irreverence to the gods, but used the ideas of his time. The state controlled stage productions, and Plautus’ plays would have been banned, if they were too risky.

### Gnaeus Naevius
Gnaeus Naevius was another Roman playwright of the late third century BC. He wrote tragedies and even founded the fabula praetexta (history plays), in which he dramatized historical events. He fought in the First Punic War and his birth was about the year 280 B.C.E. His first tragedy was written in 235 B.C.E. Plautus was living at the exact time as Naevius, but began writing later. Naevius is most famous for having been imprisoned by the Metelli and the Scipiones – two powerful families of the late third century. Naevius’ imprisonment and eventual exile is a case of state censorship. The fear of censorship may have influenced Plautus’ choice of what he wrote about and how he wrote about it.

## Typical characters
While hundreds of plays have been said to be by Plautus, there are known to be 20 surviving plays. To be able to use a more diverse set of characters, he developed what is called a *stock character*. He sometimes used typical situations where these characters could be used as well. He always used the same kinds of stock characters, especially if he could amuse the audience. As Walter Juniper wrote, “Everything, including artistic characterization and consistency of characterization, were sacrificed to humor, and character portrayal remained only where it was necessary for the success of the plot and humor to have a *persona* who stayed in character, and where the *persona* by his portrayal contributed to humor.”

For example, in * Miles Gloriosus*, the  “braggart soldier” Pyrgopolynices only shows his vain and immodest side in the first act, while the parasite Artotrogus exaggerates Pyrgopolynices’ achievements. Artotrogus  creates more and more ludicrous claims that Pyrgopolynices agrees to without question. These two are perfect examples of the stock characters of the pompous soldier and the desperate parasite that appeared in his comedies.

In this way, Plautus could greatly simplify complex characters and give the audience what it wanted. “The audience to whose tastes Plautus catered was not interested in the character play,” instead it wanted humor that was easy to understand by many people. Stock setups offered such humor. Plautus used puns, he played with words, or he gave the words another meaning. Usually, the humorous characters in his plays are of low social standing. This helps the comedy overall, because lower-class characters were often taken less seriously, and had to be less careful what they said.

## Related pages
* Moliere
* Second Punic War
* Shakespeare

## Footnotes
## Works cited

* Anderson, W. S. *Barbarian Play: Plautus’ Roman Comedy* (Toronto, 1993).
* Anderson, W.S. "The Roman Transformation of Greek Domestic Comedy," *The Classical World* 88.3 (1995), pp.&nbsp;171–180.
* Andrews, N.E. “Tragic Re-Presentation and the Semantics of Space in Plautus,” *Mnemosyne* 57.4 (2004), pp.&nbsp;445–464.
* Arnott, W. G. "A Note on the Parallels between Menander’s ‘Dyskolos’ and Plautus’ ‘Aulularia," *Phoenix* 18.3 (1964), pp.&nbsp;232–237.
* Baldwin, T.W. The Compositional Genetics of The Comedy of Errors. (Urbana 1965), pp.&nbsp;200–209.
* Barber, C.L. “Shakespearian Comedy in the Comedy of Errors,” *College English* 25.7(1964), pp.&nbsp;493–497.
* Beede, G.L. “Proverbial Expressions in Plautus,” *The Classical Journal* 44.6(1949), pp.&nbsp;357–362.
* Bieber, M. *The History of the Greek and Roman Theater*. (Princeton 1961.).
* Bradner, L. "The First Cambridge Production of Miles Gloriosus," *Modern Language Notes* 70.6 (1965), pp.&nbsp;400–403.
* Brown, PG. “Actors and Actor – Managers at Rome in the Time of Plautus and Terence,” in *Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession*. Ed. P. Easterling and E. Hall. (Cambridge 2002.).
* Castellani, V. "Plautus Versus Komoidia: Popular Farce at Rome," in *Farce*, Ed. J. Redmond (Cambridge and New York, 1988), pp.&nbsp;53–82.
* Cole, H.W. “The Influence of Plautus and Terence Upon the Stonyhurst Pageants,” *Modern Language Notes* 38 (1923), pp.&nbsp;393–399.
* Cole, S.V. “Plautus Up-to-Date.” *The Classical Journal* 16 (1921), pp.&nbsp;399–409.
* Coleman, R.G.G. “Poetic Diction, Poetic Discourse and the Poetic Register,” in *Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry*. Ed. J.N. Adams & R.G. Mayer. (Oxford and New York 1999), pp.&nbsp;21–96.
* Connors, C. "Monkey Business: Imitation, Authenticity, and Identity from Pithekoussai to Plautus," *Classical Antiquity* 23.2 (2004), pp.&nbsp;179–207.
* Conte, G.B. *Latin Literature: A History*. (Baltimore 1994).
* Draper, J.W. “Falstaff and the Plautine Parasite,” *The Classical Journal* 33 (1938), pp.&nbsp;390–401.
* Duckworth, G.E. “The Unnamed Characters in the Plays of Plautus,” *Classical Philology* 33.2 (1938), pp.&nbsp;167–282.
* Echols, E.C. “The Quid-Greeting in Plautus and Terence,” *The Classical Journal* 45.4(1950), pp.&nbsp;188–190.
* Ed. Dorey, T.A. and Dudley, D.R. *Roman Drama*, (New York, 1965).
* P. E. Easterling, Philip Hardie, Richard Hunter, E. J. Kenney ''Plautus' Casina* 1976 Cambridge University Press 
* Fantham, E. "The Curculio of Plautus: An Illustration of Plautine Methods in Adaptation," *The Classical Quarterly* 15.1 (1965), pp.&nbsp;84–100.
* Goldberg, S.M. “Plautus on the Palatine,” *The Journal of Roman Studies* 88 (1998), pp.&nbsp;1–20.
* Goldberg, S.M. “Act to Action in Plautus’ Bacchides,” *Classical Philology* 85.3 (1990), pp. 191-201.
* Halporn, J. "Roman Comedy and Greek Models," in *Theater and Society in the Classical World,* ed. Ruth Scodel (Ann Arbor, 1993), pp.&nbsp;191–213.
* Hammond, M., A.M. Mack, W. Moskalew. “Introduction: The Stage and Production,” in *Miles Gloriosus*. Ed. M. Hammond, A. Mack, W. Moskalew. (London and Cambridge 1997 repr.), pp.&nbsp;15–29.
* Hanson, J.A. *Roman Theater – Temples* (Princeton 1959).
* Harsh, P.W. “Position of Archaic Forms in the Verse of Plautus,” *Classical Philology* 35.2(1940), pp.&nbsp;126–142.
* Harsh, P.W. “The Intriguing Slave in Greek Comedy,” *Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association* 86 (1955), pp.&nbsp;135 –142.
* Hodgman, A.W. “Adjectival Forms in Plautus,” *The Classical Review* 16.9(1902), pp.&nbsp;446–452.
* Hodgman, A.W. “Adverbial Forms in Plautus,” *The Classical Review* 17.6(1903), pp.&nbsp;296–303.
* Hodgman, A.W. “Noun Declension in Plautus,” *The Classical Review* 16.6(1902), pp.&nbsp;294–305.
* Hodgman, A.W. “Verb Forms in Plautus (continued),” *The Classical Quarterly* 1.2(1907), pp.&nbsp;97–134.
* Hodgman, A.W. “Verb Forms in Plautus,” *The Classical Quarterly* 1.1(1907), pp.&nbsp;42–52.
* Hoffmann, M.E. “Conversation Openings in the Comedies of Plautus,” in *Latin Linguistics and Linguistic Theory: Proceedings of the First International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics*. Ed. H. Pinkster. (Amsterdam 1981), pp.&nbsp;217–226.
* Hough, J.N. “The Development of Plautus’ Art,” *Classical Philology* 30.1(1935), pp. 43-57.
* Hough, J.N. “The Reverse Comic Foil in Plautus,” *The American Philological Association* 73 (1942), pp.&nbsp;108–118.
* Jocelyn, H.D. “Gods, Cult, and Cultic Language in Plautus’ Epidicus,” in *Studien zu Plautus’ Epidicus*. Ed. U. Auhagen. (Tübingen 2001), pp. 261–296.
* Juniper, W.H. “Character Portrayals in Plautus,” *The Classical Journal* 31 (1936), pp. 276–288.
* Krauss, Amanda Neill *Untaming the Shrew: Marriage, Morality and Plautine Comedy * 2004
* Lindsay, W.M. *The Syntax of Plautus*. (London 2002 repr.).
* Lloyd, R. F. "Two Prologues: Menander and Plautus," *The American Journal of Philology* 84.2 (1963), pp. 146–161.
* Lowe, J. C. B. “The Virgo Callida of Plautus, Persa,” *The Classical Quarterly* 39.2(1989), pp. 390–399
* Lowe, J.C.B. "Aspects of Plautus’ Originality in the Asinaria," *The Classical Quarterly* 42 (1992), pp. 152-175.
* Marples, M. "Plautus," *Greece & Rome* 8.22 (1938), pp. 1–7.
* McCarthy, K. *Slaves, Masters, and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy*. (Princeton 2000).
* Moore, T. J. *Theater of Plautus: Playing to the Audience*. (Austin 1998).
* Moore, T.J. “Palliata Togata: Plautus, Curculio 462-86,” *The American Journal of Philology* 112.3 (1991), pp. 343–362.
* Moore, T.J. “Seats and Social Status in the Plautine Theater,” *The Classical Journal* 90.2 (1995), pp. 113–123.
* Nyman, M.A. “Where Does Latin Sum Come From?,” *Language'' 53.1(1977), pp. 39–60.
* Owens, W. M. "The Third Deception in Bacchides: Fides and Plautus' Originality," *The American Journal of Philology* 115 (1994), pp. 381–407.
* Packman, Z.M. “Feminine Role Designations in the Comedies of Plautus,” *The American Journal of Philology* 120.2 (1999), pp. 245–258.
* Prescott, H.W. "Criteria of Originality in Plautus," *Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association* 63 (1932), pp. 103–125.
* Rosivach, V.J. “Plautine Stage Settings,” *Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association* 101 (1970), pp. 445–461.
* Rudd, N. *The Classical Tradition in Operation*. (Toronto 1994), pp. 32–60.
* Ryder, K.C. “The ‘Senex Amator’ in Plautus,” *Greece & Rome* 31.2 (1984), pp.181-189.
* Seaman, W.M. "The Understanding of Greek by Plautus’ Audience," *Classical Journal* 50 (1954), pp. 115-119.
* Sedgwick, W.B. “The History of a Latin Comedy,” *The Review of English Studies* 3.11 (1927), 346-349.
* Segal, E. *Roman Laughter: The Comedy of Plautus*. (Cambridge 1968).
* Slater, N.W. *Plautus In Performance: The Theatre of the Mind*. (Princeton 1985).
* Stace, C. "The Slaves of Plautus," *Greece & Rome* 15 (1968), pp. 64–77.
* Sutton, D. F. *Ancient Comedy: The War of the Generations* (New York 1993).
* Waite, S. “Word Position in Plautus: Interplay of Verse Ictus and Word Stress,” in *The Computer in Literary and Linguistic Studies*. Ed. A. Jones & R.F. Churchhouse. (Cardiff 1976), pp. 92–105.
* Watt, H. A. “Plautus and Shakespeare: Further Comments on Menaechmi and The Comedy of Errors.” *The Classical Journal* 20 (1925), pp. 401–407.
* Wiles, D. “Recent Critical Approaches to Plautus,” in Farce. Ed. J. Redmond. (Cambridge 1988), pp. 261–272.
* Wymer, R. “Shakespeare and the Mystery Cycles,” *English Literary Renaissance* 34.3 (2004), pp.&nbsp;265–285.

## Other websites
* 
* Biographical material on Plautus.
* Works by Plautus