Historiografi Tiongkok

**Historiografi Tionghoa** adalah kajian terhadap teknik dan sumber yang dipakai sejarawan untuk menilik sejarah Tiongkok.

Pencatatan sejarah Tiongkok dapat ditilik kembali ke zaman Dinasti Shang (sekitar 1600-1046 SM). Tulisan-tulisan tersebut masih bertahan hingga zaman modern dalam bentuk inskripsi upacara, ramalan, dan pencatatan nama keluarga yang diukir atau dilukis di tempurung kura-kura atau tulang..

Sementara itu, teks sejarah tertua di Tiongkok yang telah ditemukan disusun dalam *[[Shujing]]* (書經).

## Catatan kaki

## Bacaan lanjut
* W. G. Beasley and Edwin G. Pulleyblank. *Historians of China and Japan*. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1962. Essays on the historiographical traditions in pre-modern times.
* Paul A. Cohen. *[[Discovering History in China]]: American Historical Writing on the Recent Chinese Past*. New York, London: Columbia University Press, 1984.
* Paul Cohen, "Reflections on a Watershed Date: The 1949 Divide in Chinese History," in Jeffrey Wasserstrom, ed., *Twentieth-Century China: New Approaches* (London; New York: Routledge, 2003), 29–36.
* Paul A. Cohen, *Rethinking China's History: Alternative Perspectives on the Chinese Past* (New York London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003). Reprints of Cohen's influential reviews and essays.
* Johanna Waley-Cohen, "The New Qing History," *Radical History Review* 88.1 (2004): 193–206.
* 
* Pamela Kyle Crossley, "The Historiography of Modern China," in Michael Bentley, ed., *Companion to Historiography* (Taylor & Francis, 1997), 641-658.
* Arif Dirlik. *Revolution and History: The Origins of Marxist Historiography in China, 1919–1937*. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978. .
* Prasenjit Duara. *Rescuing History from the Nation: Questioning Narratives of Modern China*. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
* Albert Feuerwerker. *History in Communist China*. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1968. Essays on the post-1949 treatment of particular aspects of Chinese history.
* Judith Farquhar James Hevia, "Culture and Postwar American Historiography of China," *positions* 1.2 (1993): 486–525. Critique of orthodox historiography.
* Joshua A. Fogel. *Politics and Sinology: The Case of Naito Konan (1866–1934)*. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Harvard East Asian Monographs, 1984. . Naito Konan developed the influential thesis that China developed an early modern society from the 8th to the 12th century.
*  Critiques the assumptions and methodology Chang Jung and John Halliday's **.
*  The life and historiographical place of Kenneth Scott Latourette.
* William Rowe, "Approaches to Modern Chinese Social History," in Olivier Zunz, ed., *Reliving the Past: The Worlds of Social History* (University of North Carolina Press 1985), pp.&nbsp;236–296.
* Gilbert Rozman. *Soviet Studies of Premodern China: Assessments of Recent Scholarship*. Ann Arbor: Center For Chinese Studies, University of Michigan, 1984. .
* David L. Shambaugh, *American Studies of Contemporary China* (Washington, Armonk, NY: Woodrow Wilson Center Press; M.E. Sharpe, 1993)
* Laurence A. Schneider, *Ku Chieh-Kang and China's New History: Nationalism and the Quest for Alternative Traditions*. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971. . The first generation of Chinese historians to use Western concepts to write the history of China.
* Stefan Tanaka. *Japan's Orient: Rendering Pasts into History*. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993. .
*  See especially Pt One, "Chinese Society And Feudalism: An Investigation Of The Past Literature," a review of Japanese historiography.
* Endymion Wilkinson. *[[Chinese History: A New Manual]].* (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, Harvard-Yenching Institute Monograph Series New Edition, 2012).  .
* Harriet Zurndorfer, "A Guide to the 'New' Chinese History: Recent Publications Concerning Chinese Social and Economic Development before 1800," *International Review of Social History* 33: 148–201.
* Wang, Q. Edward, NG, On-cho ''The Writing and Use of History in Imperial China''