Title: Aging phenomena
Description: The problem of senescence, as reflected in the history of religion and philosophy, has long been one of the greatest concerns of humankind. In contrast, gerontology as a branch of science is still comparatively young. During the past decade, concomitant with rapid progress in our understanding of the basic life sciences, vast stores of knowledge about biological aging have been accumulated. This knowledge, however, arising from many scientific disciplines and focused on varying levels of biologic organization, seems almost random and covers everything from molecules to human societies. Theories advanced to interpret the facts and to understand the mechanisms involved in senescence have remained in individual, rather than general, territories.

It has long been felt by some gerontologists that it was time for the various specialists to step back and take a generalist view of gerontology, to reconsider and reevaluate the fruits of their analytical pursuits at different levels within a broader context. Some others may think it still premature. It seemed, however, that the majority of those who gathered in Tokyo on the occasion of the XIth International Congress of Gerontology were of the opinion that there was much to be gained in looking for interrelationships among the facts and theories originated in the different levels of investigation in an attempt to observe and appreciate the biological drama of senescence as an entity. In spite of the unusual late summer heat and heavy schedules during the post-congress period, the Naito Symposium was attended by no less than 170 people from a variety of disciplines.

In the symposium, the organizer and participants tried to clarify the status of our present knowledge in the individual areas, to determine exactly what the gaps are in our current understanding, and to help point the way toward new paths for future research and, hopefully, our next breakthroughs. Thanks to the enthusiasm of colleagues from all over the world, the Naito Symposium was felt to be a success: a number of new facts were presented, some fresh strategic points discussed, and certain new ways of reasoning proposed. Looking back, however, the two full days were not enough time to arrive at a full understanding of biological aging. They were sufficient, however, for us to realize the importance of further attempts at unifying our knowledge and to be optimistic that future efforts will, indeed, be fruitful.
Subjects: Aging, Congresses, Geriatrics