Title: Agoa rules
Description: "Lesotho and other least developed African countries responded impressively to the preferences they were granted under the African Growth and Opportunities Act with a rapid increase in their clothing exports to the US.  But this performance has not been accompanied by some of the more dynamic growth benefits that might have been hoped for.  In this study we develop the theory and present empirical evidence to demonstrate that these outcomes are the predictable consequences of the manner in which the specific preferences might be expected to work.The MFA (Multi-fiber Arrangement) quotas on US imports of textiles created a favorable environment for low value-added, fabric-intensive clothing production in countries with unused quotas by inducing constrained countries to move into higher quality products.  By allowing the least developed African countries to use third country fabrics in their clothing exports to the US, AGOA provided additional implicit effective subsidies to clothing that were multiples of the US tariffs on clothing imports.  Taken together, these policies help account for the program's success and demonstrate the importance of other rules of origin in preventing poor countries from taking advantage of other preference programs.  But the disappointments can also be attributed to the preferences because they discouraged additional value-addition in assembly and stimulated the use of expensive fabrics that were unlikely to be produced locally.  When the MFA was removed, constrained countries such as China moved strongly into precisely the markets in which AGOA countries had specialized.  Although AGOA helped the least developed countries withstand this shock, they were nonetheless adversely affected.  Preference erosion due to MFN reductions in US clothing tariffs could similarly have particularly severe adverse effects on these countries"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.