Title: Pompeii Trogi fragmenta, quorum alia in codicibus manuscriptis Bibliothecae Ossolinianae invenit, alia in operibus, scriptorum maximam partem Polonorum, iam vulgatis primus animadvertit, fragmenta pridem nota adiunxit […]
Description: <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>
Full title:</b> Pompeii Trogi fragmenta, quorum alia in codicibus manuscriptis Bibliothecae Ossolinianae invenit, alia in operibus, scriptorum maximam partem Polonorum, iam vulgatis primus animadvertit, fragmenta pridem nota adiunxit, ac una cum prologis historiarum Philippicarum et criticis annotationibus edidit Augustus Bielowski Ossolinianae bibliothecae custos. Accedit notitia literaria de Trogo, et Index.

</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;">
8vo. pp. xxvi, 91. Later boards.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;">The discovery of these otherwise unknown fragments of the ‘Historiae Philippicae’ of the first-century BC Roman chronicler Gnaeus Pompeius Trogus, which concern what is now Poland, was allegedly made by August Bielowski, the Polish historian (1806-1876), in the library of the Ossolinski Institute at Lvov (now Lviv). They are treated as a forgery by Wolfgang Speyer (Die literarische Fälschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum. Munich, 1971, p. 323, n.3), citing M. Schanz, C. Hosius, and G. Krüger, ‘Geschichte der römischen Litteratur’, vol. ii (1935, 4th ed.), p. 326, but still seem to taken seriously in some quarters. Obviously rare.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;text-align:justify;line-height:normal;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="https://catalyst.library.jhu.edu/catalog/bib_5547687" rel="ugc nofollow">Click here to view the Johns Hopkins University catalog record.
</a></span></span></p>