Title: Are predatory commitments credible?
First published: 1999
Description: "In Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe? John Lott provides long-awaited empirical analysis of predatory pricing. By examining firms accused of or convicted of predation over a thirty-year period, he shows that these firms are not organized as game-theoretic or other models of predation would predict. In contrast, what evidence exists for predation suggests that government enterprises are more of a threat and are more likely to engage in predatory behavior than private firms.

This work will be of great interest to economists, legal scholars, and antitrust policy makers."--BOOK JACKET.
Subjects: Predatory pricing, Antitrust law, Prix imposes, Wucher, Verdrangungswettbewerb, Wettbewerbsrecht, Spieltheorie, Politique des prix, Concurrentiebeleid, Fixation, Concurrence, Juridische aspecten, Prix, Empirie, Droit, Prijsbeleid, Dumping (economie), Criminal justice, administration of, Courts, united states, Criminal law, united states, Pricing
Places: United States
LC classification: HF5417 .L67 1999