Title: The invention of the economy
Description: In this dissertation, I present an argument for understanding the origins of economic thought in relation to the rise of the modern state, considered both practically and intellectually. I begin from the puzzle that there is nothing like today's economics in antiquity. The main reason for this absence, I argue, is that there was nothing like the modern theory of "exchange value" in antiquity, although there is evidence (archaeological, literary, and so on) for abundant commercial transaction. The ancients understood their commercial activity not through an economic lens, but on different terms: emphasizing the forms of philia that might obtain between different "households" ( oikoi ), the prototype of which was an integrated productive-consumptive-reproductive unit, unlike the modern division of family/enterprise, or else as a form of politically regulated activity. How this ancient understanding, which was centered on the twin concepts of polis and oikos was transmuted into the tripartite modem divison of "family," "civil society" and "state"--or perhaps family, economy and government--is a question that I approach as a matter of intellectual and social history both, trying to ascertain the transitions in early modern Europe that would enable modern economic thought to emerge. Against the conventional idea that the modern economy arose as a quasi-natural phenomenon in this period, I argue that the modern economy was in fact produced under the aegis of the modem state, partly as an unintended consequence of political centralization and partly as a matter of deliberate policy.

The modem discourse of economics that helped to shape this invention of the economy arose in partial reaction against and partial mimicry of the seventeenth-century political theory that described and justified the modern state. However, the classical political economists generally described the emergence of the modem economy not in relation to changes in modem political organization, but as a "natural" development of an historical trajectory of socio-economic development particular to their times. In my later chapters, I trace the influence of post-Hobbesian political and moral theory on eighteenth-century political economy in a way that challenges the assumedly non-political character of this trajectory.